Table of Contents


U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

xxANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

2023

OR

o¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission file no. 333-94288

000-22507

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Mississippi64-0862173
(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6480 U.S. Hwy. 98 West, Suite A
Hattiesburg, Mississippi39402
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Issuer's
Issuer’s telephone number:(601) 268-8998

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on
Title of Each Class
Which Registered
Common Stock, $1.00 par valueFBMSThe NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes¨o Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes¨o Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesxNo¨

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YesxNo¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-Kx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨                   Nox

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”,company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨xAccelerated filerxo Non-accelerated filer¨o Smaller reporting Company¨

company o Emerging Growth Company¨

growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. x
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨o No x



Table of Contents


Based on the price at which the registrant’s Common Stock was last sold on June 30, 2017,2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $232,771,583.

$776.6 million.

On March 13, 2018,February 21, 2024, the registrant had outstanding 12,339,49231,227,881 shares of common stock.

Auditor Firm PCAOB ID: 686Auditor Name: FORVIS, LLPAuditor Location: Jackson, MS
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement to be filed for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 24, 201823, 2024 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than those portions of the proxy statement specifically incorporated by reference pursuant to Items 10-14 of Part III hereof, no other portions of the proxy statement shall be deemed so incorporated.



THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page



THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K

PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference herein, contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward looking. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations, or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact.fact, and may include statements relating to our projected growth, anticipated future financial performance, financial condition, credit quality and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations from expected developments or events, our business, growth and strategies. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualifying words (and their derivatives) such as “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” ”seek,” “potential,” “aim,” “continue,” “assume,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “forecast,” “goal,” “estimate,” or other statements concerning opinions or judgments of the Company, the Bank, and management about possible future events or outcomes.
These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based upon current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. The inclusion of these forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that such expectations, estimates and projections will be achieved. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and that are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date of this Annual Report, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. There are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following:
Factors that could influence the accuracy of such forward lookingforward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, competitive pressures among financial institutions increasing significantly; economic conditions, either nationally or locally, in areas in which the Company conducts operations being less favorable than expected; interest rate risk; legislation or regulatory changes which adversely affect the ability of the consolidated Company to conduct business combinations or new operations; financial success or changing strategies of the Bank’s customers or vendors; actions of government regulators; the level of market interest rates; and risks related to the proposed acquisitions of Sunshine Financial, Inc., including the risk that the proposed acquisition does not close when expected or at all because of required shareholder or other approvals and other conditions to closing are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all, the terms of the proposed transaction may need to be modified to satisfy such approvals or conditions, and the risk that anticipated benefits from the acquisition of Southwest Banc Shares, Inc. or Sunshine Financial, Inc.recent acquisitions are not realized in the time frame anticipated or at all as a result of changes in general economic and market conditions.

Potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

·reduced earnings due to higher credit losses generally and specifically because losses in the sectors of our loan portfolio secured by real estate are greater than expected due to economic factors, including declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, or changes in payment behavior or other factors;

·general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in our primary service area, becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;

·adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;

·ability of borrowers to repay loans, which can be adversely affected by a number of factors, including changes in economic conditions, adverse trends or events affecting business industry groups, reductions in real estate values or markets, business closings or lay-offs, natural disasters, and international instability;

·changes in monetary and tax policies, including potential impacts from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;

·changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment;

·the adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses and the amount of loan loss provisions required to replenish the allowance in future periods;

·reduced earnings due to higher credit losses because our loans are concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type, or location of the borrower or collateral;

·changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;

1

negative impacts on our business, profitability and our stock price that could result from prolonged periods of inflation;

·increased funding costs due to market illiquidity, increased competition for funding, higher interest rates, and increased regulatory requirements with regard to funding;

·results of examinations by our regulatory authorities, including the possibility that the regulatory authorities may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for loan losses through additional loan loss provisions or write-down of our assets;

·the rate of delinquencies and amount of loans charged-off;

·the impact of our efforts to raise capital on our financial position, liquidity, capital, and profitability;

·risks and uncertainties relating to not successfully closing and integrating the currently contemplated acquisitions within our currently expected timeframe and other terms;

·significant increases in competition in the banking and financial services industries;

·changes in the securities markets; and

·loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from national disasters or terrorist activities;

·our ability to retain our existing customers, including our deposit relationships;

·changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;

·changes in technology;

·changes in deposit flows;

·changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines;

·our ability to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting;

·other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

risks and uncertainties relating to recent, pending or potential future mergers or acquisitions, including risks related to the completion of such acquisitions within expected timeframes and the successful integration of the business that we acquire into our operations;
the risks that a future economic downturn and contraction, including a recession, could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition, credit quality, results of operations and future growth, including the risk that the strength of the current economic environment could be weakened by the continued impact of rising interest rates, and inflation;
disruptions to the financial markets as a result of the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including Russia's military action in Ukraine, the conflict in Israel and surrounding areas, terrorism or other geopolitical events;
governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve;
4

the costs and effects of litigation, investigations, inquiries or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, including the costs and effects of litigation related to our participation in government stimulus programs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic;
reduced earnings due to higher credit losses generally and specifically because losses in the sectors of our loan portfolio secured by real estate are greater than expected due to economic factors, including declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, or changes in payment behavior or other factors occurring in those areas;
general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in our primary service areas, becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;
adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;
ability of borrowers to repay loans, which can be adversely affected by a number of factors, including changes in economic conditions, adverse trends or events affecting business industry groups, reductions in real estate values or markets, business closings or layoffs, natural disasters, public health emergencies and international instability;
changes in laws and regulations affecting our businesses, including governmental monetary and fiscal policies, legislation and regulations relating to bank products and services, as well as changes in the enforcement and interpretation of such laws and regulations by applicable governmental and self-regulatory agencies, which could require us to change certain business practices, increase compliance risk, reduce our revenue, impose additional costs on us, or otherwise negatively affect our businesses;
the financial impact of future tax legislation;
changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment, including the possibility that the U.S. could default on its debt obligations;
the adequacy of the level of our allowance for credit losses and the amount of credit loss provision required to replenish the allowance in future periods;
reduced earnings due to higher credit losses because our loans are concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type, or location of the borrower or collateral;
changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;
increased funding costs due to market illiquidity, increased competition for funding, higher interest rates, and increased regulatory requirements with regard to funding;
results of examinations by our regulatory authorities, including the possibility that the regulatory authorities may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for credit losses through additional credit loss provisions or write-down of our assets;
the rate of delinquencies and amount of loans charged-off;
the impact of our efforts to raise capital on our financial position, liquidity, capital, and profitability;
significant increases in competition in the banking and financial services industries;
changes in the securities markets;
significant turbulence or a disruption in the capital or financial markets and the effect of a fall in stock market prices on our investment securities;
loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from national disasters or terrorist activities;
our ability to retain our existing customers, including our deposit relationships;
5

changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;
changes in technology or risks related to cybersecurity;
changes in deposit flows;
changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines;
our ability to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting;
risks related to the continued use, availability and reliability of "benchmark" rates and the discontinuation of quotation of London Inter Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"); and
other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
We have based our forward-looking statements on our current expectations about future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in and the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that these expectations will be achieved or the assumptions will be accurate. The Company disclaims any obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments. Additional information concerning these risks and uncertainties is contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, included in Item 1A. Risk Factors.Factors and in our future filings with the SEC. Further information on The First Bancshares, Inc. is available in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, available at the SEC’s website,http://www.sec.gov.

2
www.sec.gov.

6


ITEM 1. BUSINESS

BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

Overview and History

The CompanyFirst Bancshares, Inc. (“Company”) was incorporated on June 23, 1995 to serve as a bank holding company for The First Bank (“The First”), formerly known as The First, A National Banking Association, (“The First”), headquartered in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The Company is a Mississippi corporation and is a registered financialbank holding company. The First began operations on August 5, 1996 from our main office in the Oak Grove community, which is now incorporated within the city of Hattiesburg. As of December 31, 2017,2023, The First operated its main office and 43 full-service branches, one motor branch, and four loan production offices116 locations in Mississippi, Alabama, LouisianaFlorida, Georgia and Florida.Louisiana. Our principal executive offices are located at 6480 U.S. Highway 98 West, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39402, and our telephone number is (601) 268-8998.

The Company is a community-focused financial institution that offers a full range of financial services to individuals, businesses, municipal entities, and nonprofit organizations in the communities that it serves. These services include consumer and commercial loans, deposit accounts trust services,and safe deposit services and brokerage services.

We exited the recent recession withhave benefited from historically strong asset quality metrics compared to most of our peers, which we believe illustrates our historically disciplined underwriting and credit culture. As such, we benefited from our strength by taking advantage of growth opportunities when many of our peers were unable to do so. Since that time, weWe have also focused on growing earnings per share and increasing our tangible common equity and tangible book value per share.
In addition,recent years, we returnedhave developed and executed a regional expansion strategy to strong levelstake advantage of loan growth by continuingopportunities through several acquisitions, which has allowed us to strengthenexpand our relationships with existing clientsfootprint to Alabama, Florida Louisiana and creating new relationships.

In April 2013, we completed our first post-recession acquisition withGeorgia. We believe the purchase of First National Bank of Baldwin County, which resulted in our strategic entry into the south Alabama market. In July 2014 we completed our acquisition of Bay Bank, previously headquartered in Mobile, Alabama. The conversion and integration of these acquisitions have been successful to date, and we are optimistic that this marketthese markets will continue to contribute to our future growth and success. Also in 2014In addition, we established ade novo branch in Baton Rouge, Louisianacontinue to experience organic loan growth by continuing to strengthen our relationships with existing clients and a loan production office in Slidell, Louisiana.

creating new relationships.

On January 1, 2017, we completed the acquisitions of Iberville15, 2022, The First, then named The First, A National Banking Association, converted from a national banking association to a Mississippi state-chartered bank and changed its name to The First Bank. The First Bank and Gulf Coast Community Bank, which allowed us to expand our footprint in Florida and Louisiana. We paidis now a total of $31.1 million in cash for allmember of the outstanding equity securitiesFederal Reserve System through the Federal Reserve Bank of Iberville Bank. $2.5 million of the purchase price was held in escrow as contingency for flood-related losses in the loan portfolio incurred due to flooding in Iberville’s market area in the fall of 2016. The Company expects to receive $498,207 from the escrow for settlement of flood-related loans.

We paid an aggregate purchase price for Gulf Coast of $2.3 million, consisting of 89,591 shares of our common stock, in exchange for all of the outstanding equity securities of Gulf Coast. System integration for both acquisitions was completed during the second quarter of 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, we had 415 full-time employees and 8 part-time employees, and as of March 13, 2018, we had 481 full-time employees and 6 part-time employees.

Atlanta.

Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “the Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or similar references, mean The First Bancshares, Inc. and our subsidiaries, including our banking subsidiary, The First, A National Banking Association on a consolidated basis. References to “The First” or the “Bank” mean our wholly owned banking subsidiary, The First A National Banking Association.

Market Areas

Bank.

Human Capital Resources
At December 31, 2023, The First currently operatesemployed 1,078 full-time employees spanning five states and 116 locations. In 2023 alone, our team members donated over 3,500 volunteer hours to more than 700 organizations including delivering financial education to over 52,000 community members and students.
The First is dedicated to providing competitive compensation and benefits programs to help attract and maintain highly skilled and experienced employees. Our compensation and benefits programs include a 401(k) plan with matching contributions, a Loan Incentive Plan for our lending officers, an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, healthcare and dental insurance benefits, health savings accounts, flexible spending accounts, life and disability insurance, as well as paid time off. The Company offers a Continuing Education Program for our employees to support and help them attain personal goals and professional achievements by encouraging and supporting those who pursue and participate in four states:continuing their education.
The First endeavors to ensure that the composition of our employees, management team and board of directors are reflective of the diversity of the communities we serve. As a company, we believe in the importance of diversity, value the benefits that diversity affords our organization, and are dedicated to fostering and maintaining an inclusive culture that solicits multiple perspectives and views and is free of conscious or unconscious bias and discrimination.
7

In addition to maintaining a safe and healthy workplace, The First provides our employees with access to a Grief Counseling and Confidential Assistance Program, which provides counseling services to employees on a confidential basis to ensure our employees get the help they need when they need it. The First also has an Employee Support Program funded by our Heritage Community Foundation for bank employees who suffer a loss of loved ones, emergency medical procedures and other issues that affect employees. In 2023, our employees contributed over $76 thousand to the Heritage Community Foundation, which benefited employees in need, nonprofit organizations and local disaster relief efforts.
Market Areas
As of December 31, 2023, The First had 116 locations across Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida and Florida, as discussed below.

3
Georgia.

·Mississippi — In Mississippi, we have our main office and 16 full-service branches and one motorbank branch serving the cities of Hattiesburg, Laurel, Purvis, Picayune, Pascagoula, Bay St. Louis, Wiggins, Gulfport, Biloxi, Long Beach, Diamondhead, and the surrounding areas of Lamar, Forrest, Jones, Pearl River, Jackson, Hancock, Stone, and Harrison Counties. We also operate two loan production offices in Ocean Springs and Brandon.

·Louisiana — In Louisiana, we operate 12 branches serving the cities of Addis, Baton Rouge, Bogalusa, Denham Springs, Pierre Part, Plaquemine, Plattenville, Port Allen, Prairieville, Saint Gabriel, Siegen and White Castle. We also operate one loan production office in Slidell.

·Alabama — In Alabama, we operate ten branches serving the cities of Foley, Daphne, Fairhope, Gulf Shores, Orange Beach, Mobile, Bay Minette, Dauphin Island, and Theodore. We also operate one loan production office in Mobile.

·Florida — In Florida, we operate five branches serving the cities of Gulf Breeze, Pace, and Pensacola.

Recent Developments

On December 6, 2017,January 1, 2023, we completed the acquisition of Heritage Southeast Bancorporation, Inc. ("HSBI"), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 7, 2022, by and between the Company entered into an agreement and planHSBI. Upon completion of merger to acquire Sunshine Financial, Inc. (“Sunshine”), the holding company of Sunshine Community Bank. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Sunshine will merge with and into First Bancshares, with First Bancshares as the surviving company, (the “Sunshine Merger.”) Immediately after the Sunshine Merger, Sunshine Community Bank, a Florida-state chartered bank and wholly owned subsidiary of Sunshine, will merge with and into The First, with The First as the surviving bank. The transaction was unanimously approved by the boards of directors of each of First Bancshares and Sunshine and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018. Completion of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, and approval of Sunshine’s shareholders.

Under the terms of the agreement, holders of Sunshine common stock will receive, at the election of each Sunshine shareholder, either (i) $27.00 in cash, or (ii) 0.93 of a share of First Bancshares’ common stock, provided that the total mix of merger consideration is fixed at 75% stock and 25% cash. The aggregate transaction consideration is valued at approximately $32.1 million.

At December 31, 2017, Sunshine had approximately $201 million in total consolidated assets, $168 million in total consolidated loans, $143 million in total consolidated deposits and $22 million in stockholder’s equity.

On March 1, 2018, we completed our merger (the “Southwest Merger”) with Southwest Banc Shares, Inc. (“Southwest”), the holding company of First Community Bank. Southwest was mergedHSBI with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving corporation, and, immediately thereafter, First CommunityHeritage Southeast Bank was("Heritage Bank"), HSBI's wholly-owned subsidiary, merged with and into The First (collectively with the Southwest Merger referred to as the “Mergers”).Bank. The Company issued 1,134,010 sharespaid a total consideration of Company common stock valued at approximately $36,004,818 as of March 1, 2018, plus $24$221.5 million in cash, to the Southwestformer HSBI shareholders as consideration forin the Southwest Merger. Each outstanding shareacquisition, which included approximately 6,920,909 shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock, remained outstanding and was unaffected by the Mergers.

At December 31, 2017, Southwest had consolidated assetsapproximately $16 thousand in cash in lieu of $401 million, loans of $281 million, deposits of  $354 million, and shareholders’ equity of $37 million.

fractional shares.

Banking Services

We strive to provide our customers with the breadth of products and services offered by large regional banks, while maintaining the timely response and personal service of a locally owned and managed bank. In addition to offering a full range of deposit services and commercial and personal loans,loan products, we have a mortgage and private banking division. The following is a description of the products and services we offer.

4

Deposit Services. We offer a full range of deposit services that are typically available in most banks and savings institutions, including checking accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts, and other time deposits of various types, ranging from daily money market accounts to longer-term certificates of deposit. The transaction accounts and time certificates are tailored to our principal market areas at rates competitive to those offered by other banks in these areas. All deposit accounts are insured by the FDICFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to the maximum amount allowed by law. We solicit these accounts from individuals, businesses, associations, and organizations, and governmental authorities. In addition, we offer certain retirement account services, such as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).

and health savings accounts.

Loan Products. We offer a full range of commercial and personal loans. Commercial loans include both secured and unsecured loans for working capital (including loans secured by inventory and accounts receivable), business expansion (including acquisition of real estate and improvements), and purchase of equipment and machinery.machinery, and interest rate swap agreements to facilitate the risk management strategies of certain commercial customers. Consumer loans include equity lines of credit, and secured and unsecured loans for financing automobiles, home improvements, education, and personal investments. We also make real estate construction and acquisition loans. Our lending activities are subject to a variety of lending limits imposed by federal law. While differing limits apply in certain circumstances based on the type of loan or the nature of the borrower (including the borrower'sborrower’s relationship to the bank), in general we are subject to an aggregate loans-to-one-borrower limit of 15% of our unimpaired capital and surplus.

Mortgage Loan Division. We have a residential mortgage loan division which originates conventional, or government agency insured loans to purchase existing residential homes, or construct new homes and toor refinance existing mortgages.

Private Banking Division.We have a private banking division, which offers financial services and wealth management services to individuals who meet certain criteria.

8

Other Services. Other bank services we offer include on-lineonline internet banking services, automated teller machines, voice response telephone inquiry services, commercial sweep accounts, cash management services, safe deposit boxes, travelers checks,merchant services, mobile deposit, direct deposit of payroll and social security checks, and automatic drafts for various accounts. We are associatednetwork with theother automated teller machines that may be used by our customers throughout our market area and other regions. The First also offers credit card services through a correspondent bank.

Competition

The First generally competes with other financial institutions through the selection of banking products and services offered, the pricing of services, the level of service provided, the convenience and availability of services, and the degree of expertise and the personal manner in which services are offered. State law permits statewide branching by banks and savings institutions, and many financial institutions in our market area have branch networks. Consequently, commercial banking in Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Florida, and FloridaGeorgia is highly competitive. Many large banking organizations currently operate in our market area, several of which are controlled by out-of-state ownership. In addition, competition between commercial banks and thrift institutions (savings institutions and credit unions) has been intensified significantly by the elimination of many previous distinctions between the various types of financial institutions and the expanded powers and increased activity of thrift institutions in areas of banking which previously had been the sole domain of commercial banks. Federal legislation, together with other regulatory changes by the primary regulators of the various financial institutions, has resulted in the almost total elimination of practical distinctions between a commercial bank and a thrift institution. Consequently, competition among financial institutions of all types is largely unlimited with respect to legal ability and authority to provide most financial services. Currently there are numerous other commercial banks, savings institutions, and credit unions operating in The First'sFirst’s primary service area.

We face increased competition from both federally-chartered and state-chartered financial and thrift institutions, as well as credit unions, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, and other institutions in the Company'sCompany’s market area. Some of these competitors are not subject to the same degree of regulation and restriction imposed upon the Company. Many of these competitors also have broader geographic markets and substantially greater resources and lending limits than the Company and offer certain services such as trust banking that the Company does not currently provide. In addition, many of these competitors have numerous branch offices located throughout the extended market areas of the Company that may provide these competitors with an advantage in geographic convenience that the Company does not have at present.

5

We also compete with numerous financial and quasi-financial institutions for deposits and loans, including providers of financial services over the internet.internet, and financial technology, or fintech companies. Recent technology advances and other changes have allowed parties to effect financial transactions that previously required the involvement of banks. For example, consumers can maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks.

These nontraditional financial service providers have been successful in developing digital and other products and services that effectively compete with traditional banking services, but are in some cases subject to fewer regulatory restrictions than banks and bank holding companies, allowing them to operate with greater flexibility and lower cost structures. Although digital products and services have been important competitive features of financial institutions for some time, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the move toward digital financial services products and we expect that trend to continue.

Available Information

We

Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) we are required to file reports with the SEC. We make available free of charge, on or through our websitewww.thefirstbank.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and other filings pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, and amendments to such filings. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains the reports, proxy statements, and other filings we electronically file with the SEC. Such information is also available free of charge on or through our website www.thefirstbank.com as soon as reasonably practicable after each is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains the Company’s reports, proxy statements, and the Company’s other SEC filings. The address of the SEC’s website is www.sec.gov. Information appearing on the Company’s website is not part of any report that it files with the SEC.

9

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

We are extensively regulated under federal and state law. The Company and The First are subjectfollowing is a brief summary that does not purport to state and federal banking laws andbe a complete description of all regulations which impose specific requirementsthat affect us or restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight with respect to virtually all aspects of our operations. These laws and regulations are generally intended to protect depositors, the deposit insurance fund ("DIF") of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the stability of the U.S. banking system as a whole, rather than for the protection of our shareholders and creditors. To the extent that the following summary describes statutory or regulatory provisions, itthose regulations. This discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions. Anyprovisions described below and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the Company’s and The First’s business. In addition, proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised at both the state and federal levels. The likelihood and timing of any changes in these laws and regulations, and the impact such changes may have on us and The First, are difficult to predict. In addition, bank regulatory agencies may issue enforcement actions, policy statements, interpretive letters and similar written guidance applicable to us or to The First. Changes in applicable laws, regulations or regulationsregulatory guidance, or their interpretation by regulatory agencies or courts may have a material adverse effect on our and The First’s business, operations, and earnings.
We, The First, and our nonbank affiliates must undergo regular on-site examinations by the businessappropriate regulatory agency, which will examine for adherence to a range of legal and prospectsregulatory compliance responsibilities. A bank regulator conducting an examination has complete access to the books and records of the Company.

Beginning with the enactmentexamined institution. The results of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recoveryexamination are confidential. Supervision and Enforcement Actregulation of 1989banks, their holding companies and followingaffiliates is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and customers, the Deposit Insurance Fund ("DIF") of the FDIC, and the U.S. banking and financial system rather than holders of our capital stock.

Bank Holding Company Regulation
We are registered as a bank holding company with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), and now most recently the sweeping Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), numerous regulatory requirements have been placed on the banking industry in the recent years. A significant volume of financial services regulations required by the Dodd-Frank Act have not yet been finalized by banking regulators, Congress continues to consider legislation that would make significant changes to the law and courts are addressing significant litigation arisingReserve under the Dodd-Frank Act, making it difficult to predict the ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business The operations of the Company and The First may be affected by legislative changes and the policies of various regulatory authorities. We are unable to predict the nature or the extent of the effect on our business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, economic control, or new federal or state legislation may have in the future.

Bank Holding Company Regulation

The Company is subject to extensive regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act, of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company Act”("BHC Act"). We file quarterly reportsAs such, we are subject to comprehensive supervision, and other information withregulation by the Federal Reserve. We file reports with the SECReserve and are subject to its regulation with respectregulatory reporting requirements. Federal law subjects bank holding companies, such as the Company, to our securities, financial reporting and certain governance matters. Our securities are listedparticular restrictions on the Nasdaq Global Market,types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations.

Violations of laws and regulations, or other unsafe and unsound practices, may result in regulatory agencies imposing fines or penalties, cease and desist orders, or taking other enforcement actions. Under certain circumstances, these agencies may enforce these remedies directly against officers, directors, employees, and other parties participating in the affairs of a bank or bank holding company. Like all bank holding companies, we are subjectregulated extensively under federal and state law. Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to Nasdaq rules for listed companies.

The Company is registered withthe safety and soundness of insured depository institutions, state banking regulators, the Federal Reserve, and separately the FDIC as the insurer of bank deposits, have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions on our part if they determine that we have insufficient capital or other resources, or are otherwise operating in a bank holding company and has electedmanner that may be deemed to be treated as a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act. As such, the Companyinconsistent with safe and itssound banking practices. Under this authority, our bank regulators can require us or our subsidiaries areto enter into informal or formal supervisory agreements, including board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, written agreements and consent or cease and desist orders, pursuant to which we would be required to take identified corrective actions to address cited concerns and to refrain from taking certain actions.

If we become subject to and are unable to comply with the supervision, examinationterms of any future regulatory actions or directives, supervisory agreements, or orders, then we could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and reporting requirementsorders, possibly including consent orders, prompt corrective action restrictions and/or other regulatory actions, including prohibitions on the payment of the Bank Holding Company Actdividends on our common stock. If our regulators were to take such additional supervisory actions, then we could, among other things, become subject to significant restrictions on our ability to develop any new business, as well as restrictions on our existing business, and we could be required to raise additional capital, dispose of certain assets and liabilities within a prescribed period of time, or both. The terms of any such supervisory action could have a material negative effect on our business, reputation, operating flexibility, financial condition, and the regulationsvalue of the Federal Reserve.

6
our common stock.

10

The


Activity Limitations
Bank Holding Company Actholding companies are generally prohibits a corporation that owns a federally insured financial institution (“bank”) fromrestricted to engaging in activities other thanthe business of banking, and managing or controlling banks orbanks; and certain other subsidiaries engaging in permissible activities. Also prohibited is acquiring or obtaining control 5% or more of the voting interests of any company that engages in activities other than those activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be so closely related to banking, managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.banking. In determining whether a particular activity is permissible, the Federal Reserve considers whether the performance of the activity can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh possible adverse effects. Examples of activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be permissible are making, acquiring or servicing loans; leasing personal property; providing certain investment or financial advice; performing certain data processing services; acting as agent or broker in selling credit life insurance; and performing certain insurance underwriting activities. The Bank Holding Company Act does not place territorial limits on permissible bank-related activities of bank holding companies. Even with respect to permissible activities, however,addition, the Federal Reserve has the power to order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any nonbanking activity or terminate its ownership or control of any nonbank subsidiary, when the Federal Reserveit has reasonable cause to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control of such subsidiary would poseconstitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company.

The Bank Holding Company Act requires every

Source of Strength Obligations
A bank holding company, such as us, is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank. The term "source of financial strength" means the ability of a company, such as us, that directly or indirectly owns or controls an insured depository institution, such as The First, to provide financial assistance to such insured depository institution in the event of financial distress. The appropriate federal banking agency for the depository institution (in the case of The First, this agency is the Federal Reserve) may require reports from us to assess our ability to serve as a source of strength and to enforce compliance with the source of strength requirements by requiring us to provide financial assistance to The First in the event of financial distress. If we were to enter bankruptcy or become subject to the orderly liquidation process established by the Dodd-Frank Act, any commitment by us to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of The First would be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee or the FDIC, as appropriate, and entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, the FDIC provides that any insured depository institution generally will be liable for any loss incurred by the FDIC in connection with the default of, or any assistance provided by the FDIC to, a commonly controlled insured depository institution. The First is an FDIC-insured depository institution and thus subject to these requirements.
Acquisitions
The BHC Act permits acquisitions of banks by bank holding companies, such that we and any other bank holding company, whether located in Mississippi or elsewhere, may acquire a bank located in any other state, subject to certain deposit-percentage, age of bank charter requirements, and other restrictions. The BHC Act requires that a bank holding company obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before it: (1) acquires(i) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after such acquisition, such bank holding company will own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of suchany additional bank (2)or bank holding company, (ii) taking any action that causes any of its non-bank subsidiariesan additional bank or bank holding company to acquire allbecome a subsidiary of the assets of a bank (3) mergesholding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company, or (4) engages in permissible non-banking activities. In reviewing a proposed covered acquisition, thecompany. The Federal Reserve considersmay not approve any such transaction that would result in a bank holding company’s financial, managerial and competitive posture. The future prospectsmonopoly or would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any section of the companies and banks concerned andUnited States, or the effect of which may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly in any section of the country, or that in any other manner would be in restraint of trade, unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served are also considered.served. The Federal Reserve is also reviews any indebtednessrequired to consider: (1) the financial and managerial resources of the companies involved, including pro forma capital ratios; (2) the risk to the stability of the United States banking or financial system; (3) the convenience and needs of the communities to be incurred by a bank holding company in connection withserved, including performance under the proposed acquisition to ensure thatCommunity Reinvestment Act ("CRA"); and (4) the bank holding company can service such indebtedness without adversely affecting its ability, and the ability of its subsidiaries, to meet their respective regulatory capital requirements. The Bank Holding Company Act further requires that consummation of approved bank holding company or bank acquisitions or mergers must be delayed for a period of not less than 15 or more than 30 days following the date of Federal Reserve approval. During such 15 to 30-day period, the Department of Justice has the right to review the competitive aspectseffectiveness of the proposed transaction. The Departmentcompanies in combating money laundering.
Change in Control
Federal law restricts the amount of Justice may file a lawsuit with the relevant United States District Court seeking an injunction against the proposed acquisition.

The Federal Reserve has adopted capital adequacy guidelines for use in its examination and regulation of bank holding companies and financial holding companies. The regulatory capitalvoting stock of a bank holding company or financial holding company under applicablea bank that a person may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. Under the federal capital adequacy guidelines is particularly importantChange in Bank Control Act and the regulations thereunder, a person or group must give advance notice to the Federal Reserve’s evaluationReserve before acquiring control of the overall safety and soundness of theany bank holding company, such as the Company, or financial holding company and are important factors considered bybefore acquiring control of any state member bank, such as The First. Upon receipt of such notice, the Federal Reserve may approve or disapprove the acquisition. The Change in evaluating any applications made by suchBank Control Act creates a rebuttable presumption of control if a member or group acquires a certain percentage or more of a bank holding companycompany’s or bank’s voting stock. As a result, a person or entity generally must provide prior notice to the Federal Reserve. If regulatory capital falls below minimum guideline levels,Reserve before acquiring the power to vote 10% or more of our outstanding common stock. The overall effect of such laws is to make it more difficult to acquire a financial holding company may lose its status as a financialbank holding company and a bank holding companyby tender offer or banksimilar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, shareholders of the Company may be denied approvalless likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender offers or similar efforts to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank businesses orcontrol of other companies. Investors should be aware of these requirements when acquiring shares of our stock.

11

Governance and Financial Reporting Obligations
We are required to open additional facilities. Additionally, each bank subsidiarycomply with various corporate governance and financial reporting requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of a financial holding company2002, as well as the holding company itself must be well capitalizedrules and well managed as determinedregulations adopted by the subsidiary bank’s primary federal regulator, whichSEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), and NASDAQ. In particular, we are required to include management and independent registered public accounting firm reports on internal controls as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K in the case of The First, is the Officeorder to comply with Section 404 of the ComptrollerSarbanes-Oxley Act. We have evaluated our controls, including compliance with the SEC rules on internal controls, and have and expect to continue to spend significant amounts of time and money on compliance with these rules. Our failure to comply with these internal control rules may materially adversely affect our reputation, ability to obtain the necessary certifications to financial statements, and the values of our securities.
Corporate Governance
The Dodd-Frank Act addresses many investor protections, corporate governance, and executive compensation matters that will affect most U.S. publicly traded companies. The Dodd-Frank Act (1) grants shareholders of U.S. publicly traded companies an advisory vote on executive compensation; (2) enhances independence requirements for Compensation Committee members; and (3) requires companies listed on national securities exchanges to adopt incentive-based compensation claw-back policies for executive officers.
Volcker Rule
Section 13 of the Currency (the “OCC”). To be considered well managed,BHC Act, common referred to as the bank"Volcker Rule," generally prohibits banking organizations from (i) engaging in certain proprietary trading, and holding company must have received at least(ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a satisfactory composite rating"covered fund," all subject to certain exceptions. The Volcker Rule also specifies certain limited activities in which banking organizations may continue to engage and requires us to maintain a satisfactory management rating at its most recent examination. compliance program. Banking, organizations, such as us, with $10 billion or less in total consolidated assets and with total trading assets and liabilities of less than 5% of total consolidated assets are exempt from the Volcker Rule.
Incentive Compensation
The Federal Reserve rates bank holding companies through a confidential componentDodd-Frank Act required the banking agencies and composite 1-5 rating system,the SEC to establish joint rules or guidelines for financial institutions with a composite rating of 1 being the highest rating and 5 being the lowest. This system is designed to help identify institutions requiring special attention. Financial institutions are assigned ratings based on evaluation and rating of their financial condition and operations. Components reviewed include capital adequacy, asset quality, management capability, the quality and level of earnings, the adequacy of liquidity and sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations. As of December 31, 2017, the Companymore than $1 billion in assets, such as us and The First, were both well capitalized and well managed.

A financial holding company that becomes aware that it or a subsidiary bank has ceased to be well capitalized or well managed must notify the Federal Reserve and enter into an agreement to cure the identified deficiency. If the deficiency is not cured timely, the Federal Reserve may order the financial holding company to divest its banking operations. Alternatively, to avoid divestiture, a financial holding company may cease to engage in the financial holding company activities that are unrelated to banking or otherwise impermissible for a bank holding company. See “Capital Requirements” below for more information.

7

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 established a comprehensive framework that permits affiliations among qualified bank holding companies, commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the Bank Holding Company Act framework to permit a holding company to engage in a full range of financial activities through a financial holding company.

Federal Reserve Oversight

The Company is required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve may disapprove such a transaction if it determines that the proposed redemption or stock purchase would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice, would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order or directive or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve has issued its “Policy Statement on Cash Dividends Not Fully Covered by Earnings” (the “Policy Statement”) which sets forth various guidelines that the Federal Reserve believes a bank holding company should follow in establishing its dividend policy. In general, the Federal Reserve stated that bank holding companies should pay dividends only out of current earnings. The Federal Reserve also stated that dividends should not be paid unless the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with its capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition.

The Company is required to file annual and quarterly reports with the Federal Reserve, and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act. The Federal Reserve may examine a bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries.

Source of Strength Doctrine

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, bank holding companies must be well-capitalized and well-managed to engage in interstate transactions. In the past, only the subsidiary banks were required to meet those standards. The Federal Reserve Board’s “source of strength doctrine” has now been codified, mandating that bank holding companies such as the Company serve as a source of strength for their subsidiary banks, such that the bank holding company must be able to provide financial assistance in the event the subsidiary bank experiences financial distress.

Capital Requirements

Federal banking regulators have adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of banks and bank holding companies that is based upon the 1988 capital accord of the Bank for International Settlements’ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”), a committee of central banks and bank regulators from the major industrialized countries that coordinates international standards for bank regulation. Under the guidelines, specific categories of assets and off-balance-sheet activities such as letters of credit are assigned risk weights, based generally on the perceived credit or other risks associated with the asset. Off-balance-sheet activities are assigned a credit conversion factor based on the perceived likelihood that they will become on-balance-sheet assets. These risk weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a “risk weighted” asset base which is then measured against various measures of capital to produce capital ratios.

An organization’s capital is classified in one of two tiers, Core Capital, or Tier 1, and Supplementary Capital, or Tier 2. Tier 1 capital includes common stock, retained earnings, qualifying non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, minority interests in the equity of consolidated subsidiaries, a limited amount of qualifying trust preferred securities and qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock at the holding company level, less goodwill and most intangible assets. Tier 2 capital includes perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities not meeting the Tier 1 definition, mandatory convertible debt securities, subordinated debt, and allowances for loan and lease losses. Each category is subject to a number of regulatory definitional and qualifying requirements.

8

The Basel Committee in 2010 released a set of international recommendations for strengthening the regulation, supervision and risk management of banking organizations, known as Basel III. In July 2013, the Federal Reserve published final rules for the adoption of the Basel III regulatory capital framework (the “Basel III Capital Rules”). The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for us on January 1, 2015, with certain transition provisions phasing in over a period ending on January 1, 2019. The Basel III Capital Rules established a new category of capital measure, Common Equity Tier 1 capital, which includes a limited number of capital instruments from the existing definition of Tier 1 Capital, as well as raised minimum thresholds for Tier 1 Leverage capital (100 basis points), and Tier 1 Risk-based capital (200 basis points).

The Basel III Capital Rules established the following minimum capital ratios: 4.5 percent CET1 to risk-weighted assets; 6.0 percent Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets; 8.0 percent total capital to risk-weighted assets; and 4.0 percent Tier 1 leverage ratio to average consolidated assets. In addition, the Basel III Capital Rules also introduced a minimum “capital conservation buffer” equal to 2.5% of an organization’s total risk-weighted assets, which exists in addition to these new required minimum CET1, Tier 1, and total capital ratios. The “capital conservation buffer,” which must consist entirely of CET1, is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. The Basel III Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1, which include the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1.

The Company and The First elected in 2015 to exclude the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income items included in stockholders’ equity from the determination of regulatory capital under the Basel III Capital Rules. Based on estimated capital ratios using Basel III definitions, the Company and The First currently exceed all capital requirements of the new rule, including the fully phased-in conservation buffer.

Certain regulatory capital ratios of the Company and The First, as of December 31, 2017, are shown in the following table:

  Capital Adequacy Ratios 
     Regulatory       
     Minimums       
  Regulatory  to be Well  The First    
  Minimums  Capitalized  Bancshares, Inc.  The First 
Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio  4.50%  6.50%  14.2%  14.5%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio  6.00%  8.00%  14.9%  14.5%
Total risk-based capital ratio  8.00%  10.00%  15.5%  15.1%
Leverage ratio  4.00%  5.00%  11.7%  11.4%

The essential difference between the leverage capital ratio and the risk-based capital ratios is that the latter identify and weight both balance sheet and off-balance sheet risks. Tier 1 capital generally includes common equity, retained earnings, qualifying minority interests (issued by consolidated depository institutions or foreign bank subsidiaries), accounts of consolidated subsidiaries and an amount of qualifying perpetual preferred stock, limited to 50% of Tier 1 capital. In calculating Tier 1 capital, goodwill and other disallowed intangibles and disallowed deferred tax assets and certain other assets are excluded. Tier 2 capital is a secondary component of risk-based capital, consisting primarily of perpetual preferred stock that may not be included as Tier 1 capital, mandatory convertible securities, certain types of subordinated debt and an amount of the allowance for loan losses (limited to 1.25% of risk weighted assets).

The risk-based capital guidelines are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies, to take into account off-balance sheet exposure and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Under the risk-based capital guidelines, assets are assigned to one of four risk categories: 0%, 20%, 50% and 100%. For example, U.S. Treasury securities are assigned to the 0% risk category while most categories of loans are assigned to the 100% risk category. Off-balance sheet exposures such as standby letters of credit are risk-weighted and all or a portion thereof are included in risk-weighted assets based on an assessment of the relative risks that they present. The risk-weighted asset base is equal to the sum of the aggregate dollar values of assets and off-balance sheet items in each risk category, multiplied by the weight assigned to that category.

9

Prompt Corrective Action and Undercapitalization

The FDICIA established a system of prompt corrective action regulations and policies to resolve the problems of undercapitalized insured depository institutions. Under this system, insured depository institutions are ranked in one of five capital categories as described below. Regulators are required to take mandatory supervisory actions and are authorized to take other discretionary actions of increasing severity with respect to insured depository institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The five capital categories for insured depository institutions under the prompt corrective action regulations consist of:

Well capitalized - equals or exceeds a 10% total risk-based capital ratio, 8% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and 5% leverage ratio and is not subject to any written agreement, order or directive requiring it to maintain a specific level for any capital measure;

Adequately capitalized - equals or exceeds an 8% total risk-based capital ratio, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and 4% leverage ratio;

Undercapitalized - total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, or a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of less than 6%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4%;

Significantly undercapitalized - total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, or a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3%; and

Critically undercapitalized-a ratio of tangible equity to total assets equal to or less than 2%.

The prompt corrective action regulations provide that an institution may be downgraded to the next lower category if its regulator determines, after notice and opportunity for hearing or response, that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or has received and not corrected a less-than-satisfactory rating for any of the categories of asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity in its most recent examination.

Federal bank regulatory agencies are required to implement arrangements for prompt corrective action for institutions failing to meet minimum requirements to be at least adequately capitalized. FDICIA imposes an increasingly stringent array of restrictions, requirements and prohibitions as an organization’s capital levels deteriorate. A bank rated "adequately capitalized" may not accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits. A "significantly undercapitalized" institution is subject to mandated capital raising activities, restrictions on interest rates paid and transactions with affiliates, removal of management and other restrictions. The OCC has only very limited discretion in dealing with a "critically undercapitalized" institution and generally must appoint a receiver or conservator (the FDIC) if the capital deficiency is not corrected promptly.

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”), “critically undercapitalized” banks may not, beginning 60 days after becoming critically undercapitalized, make any payment of principal or interest on their subordinated debt (subject to certain limited exceptions). In addition, under Section 18(i) of the FDIA, banks are required to obtain the advance consent of the FDIC to retire any part of their subordinated notes. Under the FDIA, a bank may not pay interest on its subordinated notes if such interest is required to be paid only out of net profits, or distribute any of its capital assets, while it remains in default on any assessment due to the FDIC.

Federal bank regulators may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that are higher than the minimum ratios when circumstances warrant. Federal Reserve and OCC guidelines provide that banking organizations experiencing significant growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets. Concentration of credit risks, interest rate risk (imbalances in rates, maturities or sensitivities) and risks arising from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage these risks, are important factors taken into account by regulatory agencies in assessing an organization’s overall capital adequacy.

10

The OCC and the Federal Reserve also use a leverage ratio as an additional tool to evaluate the capital adequacy of banking organizations. The leverage ratio is a company’s Tier 1 capital divided by its average total consolidated assets. A minimum leverage ratio of 3.0% is required for banks and bank holding companies that either have the highest supervisory rating or have implemented the appropriate federal regulatory authority’s risk-adjusted measure for market risk. All other banks and bank holding companies are required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, unless a different minimum is specified by an appropriate regulatory authority. In order to be considered well capitalized the leverage ratio must be at least 5.0%.

Our Bank’s leverage ratio was 11.4% at December 31, 2017 and, as a result, it is currently classified as “well capitalized” for purposes of the OCC’s prompt corrective action regulations.

The risk-based and leverage capital ratios established by federal banking regulators are minimum supervisory ratios generally applicable to banking organizations that meet specified criteria, assuming that they otherwise have received the highest regulatory ratings in their most recent examinations. Banking organizations not meeting these criteria are expected to operate with capital positions in excess of the minimum ratios. Regulators can, from time to time, change their policies or interpretations of banking practices to require changes in risk weights assigned to our Bank's assets or changes in the factors considered in order to evaluate capital adequacy, which may require our Bank to obtain additional capital to support existing asset levels or future growth or reduce asset balances in order to meet minimum acceptable capital ratios.

Additional Regulatory Issues

In June 2010, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC issued joint guidance on executive compensation designed to help ensure that a banking organization’s incentive compensation policies do not encourage imprudent risk taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act required those agencies, along with the SEC, to adopt rules to require reporting of incentive compensation and to prohibit certain compensation arrangements. The objective of the guidance is to assure that incentive compensation arrangements (i) provide incentives that do notthe agencies determine to encourage excessive risk-taking, (ii) are compatible with effective internal controls and risk management and (iii) are supported by strong corporate governance, including oversightinappropriate risks by the board of directors.institution. The banking agencies issued proposed rules in 2011 and previously issued guidance on sound incentive compensation policies. In 2016, the Federal Reserve and the FDICbanking agencies also proposed rules that would, depending upon the assets of the institution, directly regulate incentive compensation arrangements and would require enhanced oversight and recordkeeping. As of December 31, 2017,2023, these rules have not been implemented.

We have undertaken efforts to ensure that our incentive compensation plans do not encourage inappropriate risks, consistent with three key principles-that incentive compensation arrangements should appropriately balance risk and financial rewards, be compatible with effective controls and risk management, and be supported by strong corporate governance.

In October 2022, the SEC adopted a final rule directing national securities exchanges and associations, including Nasdaq, to implement listing standards that require listed companies to adopt policies mandating the recovery or "clawback" of excess incentive-based compensation earned by a current or former executive officer during the three fiscal years preceding the date the listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, including to correct an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. Nasdaq's listing standards pursuant to the SEC's rule became effective on October 2, 2023. We adopted a compensation recovery policy pursuant to the Nasdaq listing standards effective as of October 2, 2023. The policy is included as Exhibit 97.1 to this Form 10-K.
Shareholder Say-On-Pay Votes
The Dodd-Frank Act requires public companies to take shareholders’ votes on proposals addressing compensation (known as say-on-pay), the frequency of a say-on-pay vote, and the golden parachutes available to executives in connection with change-in-control transactions. Public companies must give shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation at least every three years and the opportunity to vote on frequency at least every six years, indicating whether the say-on-pay vote should be held annually, biennially, or triennially. The say-on-pay, the say-on-parachute and the say-on-frequency votes are explicitly nonbinding and cannot override a decision of our Board of Directors.
12

Other Regulatory Matters
We are subject to oversight by the SEC, the PCAOB, NASDAQ and various state securities and insurance regulators. We and our subsidiaries have from time to time received requests for information from regulatory authorities in various states, including state attorneys general, securities regulators and other regulatory authorities, concerning our business practices. Such requests are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business.
Capital Requirements
We and The First are each required under federal law to maintain certain minimum capital levels based on ratios of capital to total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. The required capital ratios are minimums, and the Federal Reserve may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of capital in order to operate in a safe and sound manner. Risks such as concentration of credit risks and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as the institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates, and an institution’s ability to manage those risks, are important factors that are to be taken into account by the federal banking agencies in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The following is a brief description of the relevant provisions of these capital rules and their potential impact on our and The First’s capital levels.
We and The First are each subject to the following risk-based capital ratios: a CET1 risk-based capital ratio, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, which includes CET1 and additional Tier 1 capital and a total capital ratio, which includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. CET1 is primarily comprised of the sum of common stock instruments and related surplus net of treasury stock and retained earnings less certain adjustments and deductions, including with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets subject to temporary timing differences. Additional Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. Tier 2 capital consists of instruments disqualified from Tier 1 capital, including qualifying subordinated debt and a limited amount of loan loss reserves up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, subject to certain eligibility criteria. The capital rules also define the risk-weights assigned to assets and off-balance sheet items to determine the risk-weighted asset components of the risk-based capital rules, including, for example, certain "high volatility" commercial real estate, past due assets, structured securities and equity holdings.
The leverage capital ratio, which serves as a minimum capital standard, is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average assets net of goodwill, certain other intangible assets, and certain required deduction items. The required minimum leverage ratio for all banks and bank holding companies (unless exempt) is 4%.
In addition, effective January 1, 2019, the capital rules required a capital conservation buffer of CET1 of 2.5% above each of the minimum capital ratio requirements (CET1, Tier 1, and total risk-based capital), which is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. These buffer requirements must be met for a bank or bank holding company to be able to pay dividends, engage in share buybacks or make discretionary bonus payments to executive management without restriction.
Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our operations or financial condition. Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could also result in restrictions on the Company’s or The First’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute capital or to receive regulatory approval of applications or other restrictions on its growth.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), among other things, requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to take "prompt corrective action" regarding depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. FDICIA establishes five regulatory capital tiers: "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," and "critically undercapitalized." A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation. FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. The FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive restraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In addition, undercapitalized depository institutions may not accept brokered deposits absent a waiver from the FDIC, are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans for regulatory approval. A depository
13

institution’s holding company must guarantee any required capital restoration plan, up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it becomes undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency when the institution fails to comply with the plan. Federal banking agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution’s capital. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized. All of the federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted regulations establishing relevant capital measures and relevant capital levels for federally insured depository institutions.
To be well-capitalized, The First must maintain at least the following capital ratios:
6.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
8.0% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets;
10.0% Total capital to risk-weighted assets; and
5.0% leverage ratio.
The First was well capitalized at December 31, 2023, and brokered deposits are not restricted.
The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for bank holding companies to reflect the higher capital requirements imposed under the current capital rules applicable to banks. For purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y, bank holding companies, such as the Company, must maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater to be well-capitalized. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a very similar well-capitalized standard to bank holding companies as that applicable to The First, the Company’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2023 would exceed such revised well-capitalized standard. Also, the Federal Reserve may require bank holding companies, including the Company, to maintain capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, depending upon general economic conditions and a bank holding company’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans.
On October 29, 2019, the federal banking agencies issued a final rule to simplify the regulatory capital requirements for eligible banks and holding companies with less than $10 billion in consolidated assets that opt into the Community Bank Leverage Ratio ("CBLR") framework, as required by Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the "Regulatory Relief Act"). A qualifying community banking organization that exceeds the CBLR threshold would be exempt from the agencies’ current capital framework, including the risk-based capital requirements and capital conservation buffer described above, and would be deemed well-capitalized under the agencies’ prompt corrective action regulations. The Regulatory Relief Act defines a "qualifying community banking organization" as a depository institution or depository institution holding company with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion. Under the final rule, if a qualifying community banking organization elects to use the CBLR framework, it will be considered "well-capitalized" so long as its CBLR is greater than 9%. The First has chosen not to opt into the CBLR at this time.
In 2023, our and The First’s regulatory capital ratios were above the applicable well-capitalized standards and met the capital conservation buffer. Based on current estimates, we believe that we and The First will continue to exceed all applicable well-capitalized regulatory capital requirements and the capital conservation buffer in 2024. Certain regulatory capital ratios of the Company and The First, as of December 31, 2023, are shown in the following table:
Capital Adequacy Ratios
Regulatory
Minimums
Regulatory
Minimums
to be Well
Capitalized
Minimum
Capital Required
Basel III Fully
Phased-In
The First
Bancshares, Inc.
The First
Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio4.5 %6.5 %7.0 %12.1 %13.8 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio6.0 %8.0 %8.5 %12.5 %13.8 %
Total risk-based capital ratio8.0 %10.0 %10.5 %15.0 %14.8 %
Leverage ratio4.0 %5.0 %4.0 %9.7 %10.7 %
14

Payment of Dividends
We are a legal entity separate and distinct from The First and our other subsidiaries. The primary sources of funds for our payment of dividends to our shareholders are cash on hand and dividends from The First. There are various restrictions thatVarious federal and state statutory provisions and regulations limit the abilityamount of dividends that The First may pay.
In addition, in deciding whether or not to finance,declare a dividend of any particular size, the Company’s board of directors must consider its and the Bank’s current and prospective capital, liquidity, and other needs. In addition to state law limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, or otherwise supply funds to the Company or other affiliates. In addition, subsidiary banks of holding companies are subject to certain restrictions under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act on any extension of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, on investments in the stock or other securities thereof andimposes limitations on the takingCompany’s ability to pay dividends. Federal Reserve regulations limit dividends, stock repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers if the Company’s regulatory capital is below the level of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Further, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with extensions of credit, leases or sales of property, or furnishing of services.

Stress Testing

The Dodd-Frank Act requires stress testing of certain bank holding companies and banks that have more than $10 billion but less than $50 billion of consolidated assets (“medium-sized companies”). Additional stress testing is required for banking organizations having $50 billion or more of assets. Becauseregulatory minimums plus the consolidated assets of the Companyapplicable capital conservation buffer.

In addition, we and The First are less than these threshold levels, the stress testsubject to various general regulatory policies and requirements are not currently applicablerelating to the Companypayment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The appropriate federal bank regulatory authority may prohibit the payment of dividends where it has determined that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice. The Federal Reserve has indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice. The First.

11

Company Participation in Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives

The Congress, Treasury Department and the federal banking regulators, including the FDIC, have taken broad action since early September 2008 to address volatility in the U.S. banking system. In October 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) was enacted. The EESA authorized the Treasury Department to purchase from financialFederal Reserve has indicated that depository institutions and their holding companies upshould generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. Further, under Mississippi law, The First must obtain the non-objection of the Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance prior to $700 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial institutions and their holding companies in a troubled asset relief program (“TARP”).  The purpose of TARP was to restore confidence and stabilitypaying any dividend to the U.S. banking systemCompany.

Under a Federal Reserve policy adopted in 2009, the board of directors of a bank holding company must consider different factors to ensure that its dividend level is prudent relative to maintaining a strong financial position, and is not based on overly optimistic earnings scenarios, such as potential events that could affect its ability to encouragepay, while still maintaining a strong financial institutionsposition. As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of directors of a bank holding company should consult with the Federal Reserve and eliminate, defer or significantly reduce the bank holding company’s dividends if:
its net income available to increase their lendingshareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to customersfully fund the dividends;
its prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with its capital needs and to each other.  overall current and prospective financial condition; or
it will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.
Regulation of the Bank
The Treasury Department allocated $250 billion towardsFirst, which is a member of the TARP Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), pursuant to which the Treasury Department purchased debt or equity securities from participating institutions.  The TARP also included the Community Development Capital Initiative (“CDCI”), which was made available only to certified Community Development Financial Institutions (“CDFIs”) and imposed a lower dividend or interest rate, as applicable, than the CPP funding. Participants in the TARP areFederal Reserve System, is subject to executive compensation limitscomprehensive supervision and are encouragedregulation by the Federal Reserve, and is subject to expand their lendingits regulatory reporting requirements, as well as supervision and mortgage loan modifications.

On February 6, 2009, as partregulation by the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance. As a member bank of the CPP, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”) with the Treasury Department, pursuant to which the Company sold (i) 5,000 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series UST (the “CPP Preferred Stock”) and (ii) a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 54,705 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for an exercise price of $13.71 per share. On September 29, 2010, after successfully obtaining CDFI certification, the Company exited the CPP by refinancing its CPP funding into lower-cost CDCI funding and also accepted additional CDCI funding. In connection with this transaction, the Company retired its CPP Preferred Stock and issued to the Treasury Department 17,123 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series CD (the “CDCI Preferred Stock”). Including refinanced funding and newly obtained funding, the Company’s total CDCI funding was $17,123,000.

The America Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) contained expansive new restrictions on executive compensation for financial institutions and other companies participating in the TARP. As long as the Treasury continued to hold equity interests in the Company issued under the TARP, the Company monitored its compensation arrangements, modified such compensation arrangements, agreed to limit and limit its compensation deductions, and took such other actions as were necessary to comply with the standards discussed below. On December 6, 2016, the Company repurchased all 17,123 shares of its CDCI Preferred Shares from Treasury at fair market value. Therefore, as of December 6, 2016, the Company no longer had any obligations under TARP or the ARRA. However, as part of its repurchase obligations with the Treasury, the Company agreed to maintain its CDFI certification status for a period of two years. The eligibility requirements provide that the Company must:

• Have a primary mission of promoting community development;

• Provide both financial and educational services;

• Serve and maintain accountability to one or more defined target markets;

• Maintain accountability to a defined market; and

• Be a legal, non-governmental entity at the time of application (with the exception of Tribal governmental entities)

The First, A National Banking Association

OCC Regulation. The First operates as a national banking association incorporated under the laws of the United States and subject to supervision, inspection and examination by the OCC. The OCC regulates or monitors virtually all areas of The First’s operations, including security devices and procedures, adequacy of capitalization and loan loss reserves, loans, investments, borrowings, deposits, mergers, issuances of securities, payment of dividends, interest rates payable on deposits, interest rates or fees chargeable on loans, establishment of branches, corporate reorganizations, maintenance of books and records, and adequacy of staff training to carry on safe lending and deposit gathering practices. The OCC imposes limitations on The First’s aggregate investment in real estate, bank premises, and furniture and fixtures.Federal Reserve System, The First is required by the OCC to prepare quarterly reports onhold stock in its financial condition anddistrict Federal Reserve Bank in an amount equal to conduct an annual audit6% of its financial affairs in compliancecapital stock and surplus (half paid to acquire stock with minimum standards and procedures prescribed by the OCC.

12

Safe and Sound Banking Practices; Enforcementremainder held as a cash reserve). Banks and bank holding companies are prohibited from engaging in unsafe and unsound banking practices. Bank regulatorsMember banks do not have broad authority to prohibit and penalize activities of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws, regulations or written directives of or agreements with regulators. Regulators have considerable discretion in identifying what they deem to be unsafe and unsound practices and in pursuing enforcement actions in response to them.

Under FDICIA, all insured institutions must undergo regular on-site examinations by their appropriate banking agency. The cost of examinations of insured depository institutions and any affiliates may be assessed by the appropriate agency against each institution or affiliate as it deems necessary or appropriate. Insured institutions are required to submit annual reports to the FDIC and the appropriate agency. FDICIA also directs the FDIC to develop with other appropriate agencies a method for insured depository institutions to provide supplemental disclosure of the estimated fair market value of assets and liabilities, to the extent feasible and practicable, in any balance sheet, financial statement, report of condition, or any other report of any insured depository institution. FDICIA also requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating, among other things, to: (i) internal controls, information systems, and audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv) interest rate risk exposure; and (v) asset quality.

National banks and their holding companies which have been chartered or registered or undergone a change in control within the past two years or which have been deemed by the OCC orover the Federal Reserve Board, respectively, toSystem as a result of owning the stock and the stock cannot be troubled institutions must give the OCCsold or the Federal Reserve Board, respectively, thirty days prior noticetraded.

The deposits of the appointment of any senior executive officer or director. Within the thirty-day period, the OCC or the Federal Reserve Board, as the case may be, may approve or disapprove any such appointment.

Deposit Insurance.The FDIC establishes rates for the payment of premiums by federally insured banks and thrifts for deposit insurance. Deposits in The First are insured by the FDIC up to a maximum amount (generally $250,000 per depositor, subject to aggregation rules). The DIF is maintained by the FDIC for commercial banksapplicable limits, and, thrifts and funded with insurance premiums from the industry that are used to offset losses from insurance payouts when banks and thrifts fail. Since 1993, insured depository institutions like The First have paid for deposit insurance under a risk-based premium system. Assessments are calculated based on the depository institution’s average consolidated total assets, less its average amount of tangible equity.

Transactions With Affiliates and Insiders.The First is subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, which places limits on the amount of loans to, and certain other transactions with, affiliates, as well as on the amount of advances to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of affiliates. The aggregate of all covered transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10% of The First's capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of The First's capital and surplus. Furthermore, within the foregoing limitations as to amount, each covered transaction must meet specified collateral requirements.

accordingly, The First is also subject to Section 23Bcertain FDIC regulations and the FDIC has backup examination authority and some enforcement powers over The First.

In addition, as discussed in more detail below, The First and any other of our subsidiaries that offer consumer financial products and services are subject to regulation and potential supervision by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"). In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are stricter than those regulations promulgated by the CFPB, and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce certain federal consumer financial protection law.
Broadly, regulations applicable to The First include limitations on loans to a single borrower and to its directors, officers and employees; restrictions on the opening and closing of branch offices; the maintenance of required capital
15

ratios; the granting of credit under equal and fair conditions; the disclosure of the Federal Reserve Act, which prohibits an institution from engagingcosts and terms of such credit; requirements to maintain reserves against deposits and loans; limitations on the types of investment that may be made by The First; requirements governing risk management practices; restrictions on the ability of institutions to guarantee its debt; and certain specific accounting requirements on the Company that may be more restrictive and may result in certain transactionsgreater or earlier charges to earnings or reductions in its capital than generally accepted accounting principles.
Transactions with affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to such institution, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. Affiliates and Insiders
The First is subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit and certain other transactions between The First and the Company or any nonbank affiliate. Generally, these covered transactions with either the Company or any affiliate are limited to executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders,10% of The First’s capital and their related interests. Suchsurplus, and all such transactions between The First Bank and the Company and all of its nonbank affiliates combined are limited to 20% of The First’s capital and surplus. Loans and other extensions of credit (i) mustfrom The First to the Company or any affiliate generally are required to be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates andsecured by eligible collateral as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties and (ii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.

Change in ControlWith certain limited exceptions, the BHCAspecified amounts. In addition, any transaction between The First and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with regulations promulgated thereunder, prohibit a personCompany or company or a group of persons deemedany affiliate are required to be “acting in concert” from, directly or indirectly, acquiring more than 10% (5% if the acquirer is a bank holding company) of any class of our voting stock or obtaining the ability to control in any manner the election of a majority of our directors or otherwise direct the management or policies of our company without prior notice or application to and the approval of the Federal Reserve.

13
on an arm’s length basis.

Dividends.The principal source of funds from which we pay cash dividends are the dividends received from our bank subsidiary, The First. Federal banking laws also place similar restrictions on certain extensions of credit by insured banks, such as The First, to their directors, executive officers and regulations restrictprincipal shareholders.

Reserves
Federal Reserve rules require depository institutions, such as The First, to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts, primarily NOW and regular checking accounts. Effective March 26, 2020, the amountFederal Reserve eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions. These reserve requirements are subject to annual adjustment by the Federal Reserve.
FDIC Insurance Assessments and Depositor Preference
The First’s deposits are insured by the FDIC’s DIF up to the limits under applicable law, which currently are set at $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. The First is subject to FDIC assessments for its deposit insurance. The FDIC calculates quarterly deposit insurance assessments based on an institution’s average total consolidated assets less its average tangible equity, and applies one of dividends and loans a bank may makefour risk categories determined by reference to its parent company. A nationalcapital levels, supervisory ratings, and certain other factors. The assessment rate schedule can change from time to time, at the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits.
As of June 30, 2020, the DIF reserve ratio fell to 1.30%, below the statutory minimum of 1.35%. The FDIC, as required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, established a plan on September 15, 2020 to restore the DIF reserve ration to meet or exceed the statutory minimum of 1.35% within eight years. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted an amended restoration plan to increase the likelihood that the reserve ratio would be restored to at least 1.35% by September 30, 2028. The FDIC's amended restoration plan increases the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC could further increase the deposit insurance assessments for certain insured depository institutions, including The First, if the DIF reserve ratio is not restored as projected.
In November 2023, the FDIC approved a final rule to implement a special assessment to recover the loss to DIF associated with several bank failures that occurred during early 2023. The assessment base for the special assessment is equal to estimated uninsured deposits reported as of December 31, 2022, adjusted to exclude the first $5 billion, to be collected at an annual rate of approximately 13.4 basis points for an anticipated total of eight quarterly assessment periods, beginning the first quarterly assessment period of 2024. The First did not have uninsured deposits in excess of $5 billion, and so is not subject to this special assessment.
Insurance of deposits may not pay dividends from its capital. All dividends must be paid out of undivided profits then on hand, after deducting expenses, including reserves for lossesterminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and bad debts.unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by a bank’s federal regulatory agency. In addition, a national bank is prohibited from declaring a dividend on its shares of common stock until its surplus equals its stated capital, unless the bank has transferred to surplus no less than one-tenth of its net profitsFederal Deposit Insurance Act provides that, in the event of the preceding two consecutive half-year periods (in the caseliquidation or other resolution of an annual dividend). The approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, under FDICIA, the banks may not pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, the bank would be undercapitalized. See "Capital Requirements" above.

Interstate Branching and Acquisitions.National banks are required by the National Bank Act to adhere to branch office banking laws applicable to state banks in the states in which they are located. Formerly, under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, a bank’s ability to branch into a particular state was largely dependent upon whether the state “opted in” to de novo interstate branching. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, de novo interstate branching by national banks is permitted if, under the laws of the state where the branch is to be located, a state bank chartered in that state would be permitted to establish a branch. Further, a bank headquartered in one state is authorized to merge with a bank headquartered in another state, as long as neither of the states have opted out of such interstate merger authority, and subject to any state requirement that the target bank shall have been in existence and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years and certain deposit market-share limitations. Under current Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana and Florida law, The First may open branches or acquire existing banking operations throughout these states with the prior approval of the OCC. The Dodd-Frank Act permits out of state acquisitions by bank holding companies (subject to veto by new state law), interstate branching by banks if allowed by state law, interstate merging by banks, and de novo branching by national banks if allowed by state law. All branching in which The First may engage remains subject to regulatory approval and adherence to applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Community Reinvestment Act.The Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas consistent with safe and sound banking practice. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, each depository institution is required to help meet the credit needs of its market areas by, among other things, providing credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and communities. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the CRA and are assigned ratings. In order for a financial holding company to commence new activity permitted by the BHCA, each insured depository institution, subsidiarythe claims of depositors of the financialinstitution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution, including those of the parent bank holding company mustcompany.

16

Standards for Safety and Soundness
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation or guideline, operational and managerial standards for all insured depository institutions relating to: (1) internal controls; (2) information systems and audit systems; (3) loan documentation; (4) credit underwriting; (5) interest rate risk exposure; and (6) asset quality. The federal banking agencies have receivedadopted regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement these required standards. These guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards used to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. Under the regulations, if a ratingregulator determines that a bank fails to meet any standards prescribed by the guidelines, the regulator may require the bank to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance, consistent with deadlines for the submission and review of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination under the CRA. These factors are considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions,such safety and applications to open a branch or facility.

USA Patriot Act. In 2001,soundness compliance plans.

Anti-Money Laundering
Under the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (“USA PATRIOT”) Act of 2001, (the “USA Patriot Act”) was signed into law.financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and “know your customer” standards in their dealings with foreign financial institutions and foreign customers. The USA PatriotPATRIOT Act, broadenedand its implementing regulations adopted by the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to additional types of financial institutions, such as broker-dealers, and strengthened the abilityFinCEN, a bureau of the U.S. government to detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The principal provisions of Title IIIDepartment of the USA Patriot Act require that regulatedTreasury, requires financial institutions including banks: (i)to establish an anti-money laundering programprograms with minimum standards that includesinclude:
the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls;
the designation of a compliance officer;
an ongoing employee training program;
an independent audit function to test the programs; and
identify and audit components; (ii) comply with regulations regarding the verification ofverify the identity of any person seeking to open an account; (iii) take additional required precautions with non-U.S. owned accounts; and (iv) perform certain verification and certificationbeneficial owners of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships. The USA Patriot Act also expanded the conditions under which funds in a U.S. interbank account may be subject to forfeiture and increased the penalties for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. The First has adopted policies, procedures and controls to addressentity customers.
Banking regulators will consider compliance with the requirementsAct’s money laundering provisions in acting upon acquisition and merger proposals. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and have been active in imposing cease and desist and other regulatory orders and money penalty sanctions against institutions found to be violating these obligations. Sanctions for violations of the USA Patriot Act undercan be imposed in an amount equal to twice the existing regulations andsum involved in the violating transaction, up to $1 million. On January 1, 2021, Congress passed federal legislation that made sweeping changes to federal anti-money laundering laws, including changes that will continue to revise and update its policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA Patriot Act and implementing regulations.

14
be implemented in subsequent years.

Economic Sanctions

Office of Foreign Assets Control.

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”("OFAC") is responsible for administeringhelping to ensure that U.S. entities do not engage in transactions with certain prohibited parties, as defined by various Executive Orders and enforcing economicacts of Congress. OFAC publishes, and trade sanctions againstroutinely updates, lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. If we find a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, we must undertake certain specified foreign parties, including countriesactivities, which could include blocking or freezing the account or transaction requested, and regimes, foreign individualswe must notify the appropriate authorities.
Concentrations in Lending
During 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “Guidance”) and advised financial institutions of the risks posed by CRE lending concentrations. The Guidance requires that appropriate processes be in place to identify, monitor and control risks associated with real estate lending concentrations. Higher allowances for loan losses and capital levels may also be required. The Guidance is triggered when CRE loan concentrations exceed either:
Total reported loans for construction, land development, and other foreign organizationsland of 100% or more of a bank’s total risk-based capital; or
17

Total reported loans secured by multifamily and entities. OFAC publishes listsnonfarm nonresidential properties and loans for construction, land development, and other land of prohibited300% or more of a bank’s total risk-based capital.
The Guidance also applies when a bank has a sharp increase in CRE loans or has significant concentrations of CRE secured by a particular property type. We have always had exposures to loans secured by CRE due to the nature of our markets and the loan needs of both retail and commercial customers. We believe our long term experience in CRE lending, underwriting policies, internal controls, and other policies currently in place, as well as our loan and credit monitoring and administration procedures, are generally appropriate to managing our concentrations as required under the Guidance.
Community Reinvestment Act
The First is subject to the provisions of the CRA, which imposes a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with their safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of entire communities where the bank accepts deposits, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Federal Reserve’s assessment of The First’s CRA record is made available to the public. Further, a less than satisfactory CRA rating will slow, if not preclude, expansion of banking activities and prevent a company from becoming or remaining a financial holding company. Following the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB”), CRA agreements with private parties that are regularly consultedmust be disclosed and annual CRA reports must be made to a bank’s primary federal regulator. A bank holding company will not be permitted to become or remain a financial holding company and no new activities authorized under GLB may be commenced by our Bank in the conducta holding company or by a bank financial subsidiary if any of its businessbank subsidiaries received less than a “satisfactory” CRA rating in order to assure compliance. We are responsible for,its latest CRA examination. Federal CRA regulations require, among other things, blocking accountsthat evidence of discrimination against applicants on a prohibited basis, and transactionsillegal or abusive lending practices be considered in the CRA evaluation. The First has a rating of “Satisfactory” in its most recent CRA evaluation.
On October 24, 2023, the OCC, the FRB, and FDIC issued a final rule to modernize their respective CRA regulations. The revised rules substantially alter the methodology for assessing compliance with prohibitedthe CRA, with material aspects taking effect January 1, 2026 and revised data reporting requirements taking effect January 1, 2027. Among other things, the revised rules evaluate lending outside traditional assessment areas generated by the growth of non-branch delivery systems, such as online and mobile banking, apply a metrics-based benchmarking approach to assessment, and clarify eligible CRA activities. The final rules may make it more challenging and/or costly for the Bank to receive a rating of at least "satisfactory" on its CRA exam.
Privacy, Credit Reporting, and Data Security
The GLB generally prohibits disclosure of consumer information to non-affiliated third parties identified by OFAC, avoiding unlicensed tradeunless the consumer has been given the opportunity to object and financial transactions withhas not objected to such parties and reporting blocked transactions afterdisclosure. Financial institutions are further required to disclose their occurrence. Failureprivacy policies to customers annually. Financial institutions, however, will be required to comply with OFAC requirements couldstate law if it is more protective of consumer privacy than the GLB. The GLB also directed federal regulators to prescribe standards for the security of consumer information. The First is subject to such standards, as well as standards for notifying customers in the event of a security breach. The First utilizes credit bureau data in underwriting activities. Use of such data is regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V on a uniform, nationwide basis, including credit reporting, prescreening, and sharing of information between affiliates and the use of credit data. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, which amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act, permits states to enact identity theft laws that are not inconsistent with the conduct required by the provisions of that Act. We are also required to have serious legal, financialan information security program to safeguard the confidentiality and reputational consequencessecurity of customer information and to ensure proper disposal. Customers must be notified when unauthorized disclosure involves sensitive customer information that may be misused. The federal banking agencies also require banks to notify their regulators within 36 hours of a “computer-security incident” that rises to the level of a “notification incident.”
Anti-Tying Restrictions
In general, a bank may not extend credit, lease, sell property, or furnish any services or fix or vary the consideration for our Bank.

them on the condition that (1) the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property, or services from or to the bank or bank holding company or their subsidiaries or (2) the customer not obtain some other credit, property, or services from a competitor, except to the extent reasonable conditions are imposed to assure the soundness of the credit extended. A bank may, however, offer combined-balance products and may otherwise offer more favorable terms if a customer obtains two or more traditional bank products. The law also expressly permits banks to engage in other forms

18

of tying and authorizes the Federal Reserve to grant additional exceptions by regulation or order. Also, certain foreign transactions are exempt from the general rule.
Consumer Protection Regulations.InterestRegulation
Activities of The First are subject to a variety of statutes and certainregulations designed to protect consumers. These laws and regulations include, among numerous other things, provisions that:
limit the interest and other charges collected or contracted for by The First, are subject to state usury lawsincluding rules respecting the terms of credit cards and certain federal laws concerning interest rates.of debit card overdrafts;
govern The First’s loan operations are subject to certain federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the federal Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers; the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions
require The First to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institutionit is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs communityof the communities it serves;
prohibit The First from discriminating on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors when it makes decisions to extend credit;
govern the manner in which The First may collect consumer debts; and
prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in the provision of consumer financial products and services.
Mortgage Regulation
The CFPB has issued rules to implement requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act pertaining to mortgage loan origination (including with respect to loan originator compensation and loan originator qualifications) as well as integrated mortgage disclosure rules. In addition, the CFPB has issued rules that require servicers to comply with new standards and practices with regard to: error correction; information disclosure; force-placement of insurance; information management policies and procedures; requiring information about mortgage loss mitigation options be provided to delinquent borrowers; providing delinquent borrowers access to servicer personnel with continuity of contact about the borrower’s mortgage loan account; and evaluating borrowers’ applications for available loss mitigation options. These rules also address initial rate adjustment notices for adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), periodic statements for residential mortgage loans, and prompt crediting of mortgage payments and response to requests for payoff amounts.
Non-Discrimination Policies
The First is also subject to, among other things, the provisions of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibiting(the “ECOA”) and the Fair Housing Act (the “FHA”), both of which prohibit discrimination based on the basis of race or color, religion, national origin, sex, and familial status in any aspect of a consumer or other prohibited factors in extending credit; the Fair Credit Reporting Actcommercial credit or residential real estate transaction. The Department of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies; the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, concerning the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;Justice (the “DOJ”), and the rulesfederal bank regulatory agencies have issued an Interagency Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending that provides guidance to financial institutions in determining whether discrimination exists, how the agencies will respond to lending discrimination, and regulationswhat steps lenders might take to prevent discriminatory lending practices. The DOJ has increased its efforts to prosecute what it regards as violations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws. The deposit operations of The First also are subject to the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial recordsECOA and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records, and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Federal Reserve Board to implement that Act, which governs automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers' rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.

Other Regulatory Matters

Risk-retention rules. Under the final risk-retention rules, banks that sponsor the securitization of asset-backed securities and residential-mortgage backed securities are required to retain 5% of any loan they sell or securitize, except for mortgages that meet low-risk standards to be developed by regulators.

Changes to federal preemption. The Dodd-Frank Act created a new independent supervisory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) that is housed within the Federal Reserve. The CFPB is the primary regulator for federal consumer financial statutes. State attorneys general are authorized to enforce new regulations issued by the CFPB. Although the application of most state consumer financial laws to The First will continue to be preempted under the National Bank Act, OCC determinations of such preemption are made on a case-by-case basis. As a result, it is possible that state consumer financial laws enacted in the future may be held to apply to our business activities. The cost of complying with any such additional laws could have a negative impact on our financial results.

Mortgage Rules. During 2013, the CFPB finalized a series of rules related to the extension of residential mortgage loans by banks. Among these rules are requirements that a bank make a good faith determination that a borrower has the ability to repay a mortgage loan prior to extending such credit, a requirement that certain mortgage loans provide for escrow payments, new appraisal requirements, and specific rules regarding how loan originators may be compensated and the servicing of residential mortgage loans. The implementation of these new rules began in January 2014.

Volcker Rule. In December 2013, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the OCC, the Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued the “Prohibitions And Restrictions On Proprietary Trading And Certain Interests In, And Relationships With, Hedge Funds And Private Equity Funds,” commonly referred to as the Volcker Rule, which regulates and restricts investments which may be made by banks. The Volcker Rule was adopted to implement a portion of the Dodd-Frank Act and new Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act, which prohibits any banking entity from engaging in proprietary trading or from acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, or sponsoring or having certain relationships with, a hedge fund or private equity fund (“covered funds”), subject to certain exemptions.

15
FHA.

Debit Interchange Fees

Interchange fees, or “swipe” fees, are fees that merchants pay to credit card companies and card-issuing banks such as The First for processing electronic payment transactions on their behalf. The maximum permissible interchange fee that an issuer may receive for an electronic debit transaction is the sum of 21 cents per transaction and 5 basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction, subject to an upward adjustment of 1 cent if an issuer certifies that it has implemented policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve the fraud-prevention standards set forth by the Federal Reserve.

In addition, the legislation prohibits card issuers and networks from entering into exclusive arrangements requiring that debit card transactions be processed on a single network or only two affiliated networks, and allows merchants to determine transaction routing. Due to the Company’s size, the Federal Reserve rule limiting debit interchange fees has not reduced our debit card interchange revenues.

Summary

The foregoing is a brief summary of certain statutes, rules and regulations affecting the Company and The First. It is not intended to be an exhaustive discussion of all statutes and regulations having an impact on the operations of such entities.

Increased regulation generally has resulted in increased legal and compliance expense.

Finally, additional bills may be introduced in the future in the U.S. Congress and state legislatures to alter the structure, regulation and competitive relationships of financial institutions. It cannot be predicted whether and in what form any of these proposals will be adopted or the extent to which the business of the Company and The First may be affected thereby.

Effect of Governmental Monetary and Fiscal Policies

The difference between the interest rate paid on deposits and other borrowings and the interest rate received on loans and securities comprises most of a bank’s earnings. In order to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in the industry, the banking business is becoming increasingly dependent on the generation of fee and service charge revenue.

The earnings and growth of a bank are affected by both general economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policy of the U.S. government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve sets national monetary policy such as seeking to curb inflation and combat recession. This is accomplished by its open-market operations in U.S. government securities, adjustments in the amount of reserves that financial institutions are required to maintain and adjustments to the discount rates on borrowings and target rates for federal funds transactions. The actions of the Federal Reserve in these areas influence the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest
19

rates on loans and deposits. The nature and timing of any future changes in monetary policies and their potential impact on the Company cannot be predicted.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Making or continuing an investment in securities, including

Our business is subject to risk. The following discussion, along with management’s discussion and analysis and our financial statements and footnotes, sets forth the Company’s Common Stock, involves certain risks that you should carefully consider. Themost significant risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks that may have a material adverse effect on the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties alsowe believe could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be affected, the market price for your securities could decline,operations. Additional risks and you could loseuncertainties that management is not aware of or that management currently deems immaterial may also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. There is no assurance that this discussion covers all or a part of your investment.potential risks that we face. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set forth below also are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the Company’sour actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.

16
herein.

Risk Factors Associated Withwith Our Business

General economic conditions in the areas where our operations or loans are concentrated may adversely affect our customers’ ability to meet their obligations.

financial results or liquidity.

A sudden or severe downturn in the economy in the geographic markets we serve in the states of Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida or FloridaGeorgia may affect the ability of our customers to meet loan payment obligations on a timely basis. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on our commercial, real estate, and construction loans, the ability of borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing such loans. Any deterioration in the economic conditions of these market areas could negatively impact the financial results of the Company’s banking operations, earnings, and profitability.

Additionally, adverse

Our Bank requires liquidity in the form of available funds to meet its deposit, debt and other obligations as they come due, borrower requests to draw on committed credit facilities as well as unexpected demands for cash payments. Adverse economic changes may cause customers to withdraw deposit balances, thereby causing a strain on our liquidity. Moreover, customers with larger uninsured deposit account balances often are small-and mid-sized businesses that rely upon deposit funds for payment of operational expenses and, as a result, are more likely to closely monitor for financial condition and performance of their depository institutions. As a result, in the event of financial distress, uninsured depositors historically have been more likely to withdraw their deposits. If a significant portion of our deposits were to be withdrawn within a short period of time, additional sources of liquidity may be required to meet withdrawal demands. We have historically had access to a number of alternative sources of liquidity, but if there is an increase in volatility in the credit and liquidity markets there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such liquidity on terms that are favorable to us, or at all.

We may be vulnerable to certain sectors of the economy, including real estate.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate.The Real estate values in our markets have experienced periods of fluctuation over the last several years, and the market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a relatively short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located.time. If the economy deteriorates and real estate values depress beyonddecline materially in one or more of our markets, the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio could increase, a certain point, as happened during the last recession, the collateral valuesignificant part of theour loan portfolio could become under-collateralized and the revenue stream from those loanslosses incurred upon borrower defaults would increase. This could come under stress andresult in additional loancredit loss accruals could be required which would negatively impact our earnings. Our ability to dispose of foreclosed real estate at prices above the respective carrying values could also be impacted, which could cause our results of operations to be adversely affected.

Unpredictable market conditions may adversely affect the industry in which we operate.

The capital and credit markets are subject to volatility and disruption. Dramatic declines in the housing market in years past caused home prices to fall and increased foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment. These events, if they were to happen again, could negatively impact the credit performance of mortgage loans and result in significant write-downs of asset values, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial and investment banks. Market turmoil and tightening of credit could lead to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence and widespread reduction of business activity generally. Aactivity. Generally, a worsening of these conditions would have
20

an adverse effect on us and others in the financial institution industry, generally, particularly in our real estate markets, as lower home prices and increased foreclosures would result in higher charge-offs and delinquencies.

The state of the economy and various economic factors, including inflation, recession, unemployment, interest rates and the level of U.S. debt, as well as governmental action and uncertainty resulting from U.S. and global political trends, may directly and indirectly, have a destabilizing effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the U.S. government's decisions regarding its debt ceiling and the possibility that the U.S. could default on its debt obligations could cause further interest rate increases, disrupt access to capital markets and deepen recessionary conditions. An unfavorable or uncertain national or regional political or economic environment could drive losses beyond those which are provided for in our allowance for loancredit losses and could negatively impact our results of operations

operations.

We must maintain an appropriate allowance for loancredit losses.

The First, as lender, is exposed to the risk that its customers will be unable to repay their loans in accordance with their terms and that any collateral securing the payment of their loans may not be sufficient to assure repayment. Credit losses are inherent in the business of making loans and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Credit risk with respect to our real estate and construction loan portfolio relates principally to the creditworthiness of the borrower corporations and the value of the real estate serving as security for the repayment of loans. Credit risk with respect to our commercial and consumer loan portfolio will relate principally to the general creditworthiness of the borrower businesses and individuals within our local markets.

17

On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ("ASC 326"). The First makes various assumptionsFinancial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 326 to replace the incurred loss model for loans and judgments aboutother financial assets with an expected loss model and requires consideration of a wider range of reasonable and supportable information to determine credit losses. In accordance with ASC 326, the collectability ofCompany has developed an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) methodology effective January 1, 2021, which replaces its loan portfolio based on a number of factors. We maintain anprevious allowance for loan losses whichmethodology. The ACL is a reserve established throughvaluation account that is deducted from loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.

Management estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term as well as for changes in environment conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, or other relevant factors. Management may selectively apply external market data to subjectively adjust the Company’s own loss history including index or peer data. Management evaluates the adequacy of the ACL quarterly and makes provisions for credit losses based on this evaluation. See Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements. Changes in economic conditions or individual business or personal circumstances affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the ACL. Further, if actual charge-offs in future periods exceed our estimation of charge-offs, we may need additional provision for loan losses charged to expense each quarter, that is consistent with management’s assessment ofrestore the collectability of the loan portfolio in light of the amount of loans committed and outstanding and current economic conditions and market trends. When specific loan losses are identified, the amount of the expected loss is removed, or charged-off, from the allowance. The First believes that its current allowance for loan losses is adequate. However, if our assumptions or judgments prove to be incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses. We may have to increase the allowance in the future in response to the request of oneadequacy of our primary banking regulators,ACL. If we are required to adjustmaterially increase our level of ACL for changing conditions and assumptions, or as a result of any deterioration in the quality of the loan portfolio. The actual amount of future provisions for loan losses cannot be determined at this time and may vary from the amounts of past provisions. Any increase in the allowance for loan losses or in the amount of loan charge-offs required by regulatory agencies or for other factorsreason, such increases could have a negativean adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations and financial condition.

operations.

We are subject to risks related to changes in market interest rates.

Our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature, and as a result we are subject to significant risks resulting from changes in interest rates. Our profitability is largely dependent upon net interest income. Unexpected movement in interest rates markedly changing the slope of the current yield curve could cause net interest margins to decrease, subsequently decreasing net interest income. In addition, such changes could adversely affect the valuation of our assets and liabilities.

At present the Company’s one-year interest rate sensitivity position is asset sensitive. As with most financial institutions, the Company’s results of operations are affected by changes in interest rates and the Company’s ability to manage this risk. The difference between interest rates charged on interest-earning assets and interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities may be affected by changes in market interest rates, changes in relationships between interest rate indices, and/or changes in the relationships between long-term and short-term market interest rates. A change in this difference might result in an increase in interest expense relative to interest income, or a decrease in the Company’s interest rate spread.

Certain changes in interest rates, inflation, or the financial markets could affect demand for our products and our ability to deliver products efficiently.

Loan originations, and therefore loan revenues, could be adversely impacted by rising interest rates.Increases in market interest rates can have negative impacts on our business, including reducing our customers' desire to borrow money from us or adversely affecting their ability to repay their outstanding loans by increasing their debt service obligations through the periodic reset of adjustable interest rate loans. If our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans is impaired by increasing interest payment obligations, our level of non-performing assets would increase, producing an adverse effect on operating results. Asset values, especially commercial real estate as collateral, securities or other fixed rate earning assets, can decline significantly with relatively minor changes in interest rates.Conversely, falling rates could increase prepayments within our loan and securities portfolio lowering interest earnings from those assets. An unanticipated increase in inflation could cause operating costs related to salaries and benefits, technology, and supplies to increase at a faster pace than revenues.

The fair market value of the securities portfolio and the investment income from these securities also fluctuates depending on general economic and market conditions. In addition, actual net investment income and/or cash flows from investments that carry prepayment risk, such as mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, may differ from those anticipated at the time of investment as a result of interest rate fluctuations.

21

Beginning in early 2022, in response to growing signs of inflation, the FRB increased interest rates rapidly. Further, the FRB has increased the benchmark rapidly and has announced an intention to take further actions to mitigate rising inflationary pressures. Rising interest rates can have a negative impact on our business by reducing the amount of money our clients borrow or by adversely affecting their ability to repay outstanding loan balances that may increase due to adjustments in their variable rates. In addition, as interest rates rise, so have competitive pressures on the deposit cost of funds. We may have to offer more attractive interest rates to depositors to compete for deposits, or pursue other sources of liquidity, such as wholesale funds, which could result in negative pressure on our net interest income. It is not possible to predict the pace and magnitude of changes in interest rates, or the impact rate changes will have on the Company’s results of operations.
Certain changes in interest rates, inflation, or the financial markets could affect demand for our products and our ability to deliver products efficiently.
Loan originations, and therefore loan revenues, could be adversely impacted by rising interest rates. Increases in market interest rates can have negative impacts on our business, including reducing our customers’ desire to borrow money from us or adversely affecting their ability to repay their outstanding loans by increasing their debt service obligations through the periodic reset of adjustable interest rate loans. If our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans is impaired by increasing interest payment obligations, our level of non-performing assets would increase, producing an adverse effect on operating results. Asset values, especially commercial real estate as collateral, securities or other fixed rate earning assets, can decline significantly with relatively minor changes in interest rates. If interest rates were to decrease, our yield on our variable rate loans and on our new loans would decrease, reducing our net interest income. In addition, lower interest rates may reduce our realized yields on investment securities, which would reduce our net interest income and cause downward pressure on net interest margin in future periods. A significant reduction in our net interest income could have a material adverse impact on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
Continued increases in inflation could cause operating costs related to salaries and benefits, technology, and supplies to increase at a faster pace than revenues.
Evaluation of investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment involves subjective determinations and could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition.

The evaluation of impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties, and is intended to determine whether declines in the fair value of investments should be recognized in current period earnings. The risks and uncertainties include changes in general economic conditions, the issuers’ financial condition or future recovery prospects, the effects of changes in interest rates or credit spreads and the expected recovery period. Estimating future cash flows involves incorporating information received from third-party sources and making internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the underlying collateral and assessing the probability that an adverse change in future cash flows has occurred. The determination of the amount of other-than-temporary impairments is based upon the Company’s quarterly evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

18

Additionally, our management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its reasonable judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for recovery. Inherent in management’s evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Impairments to the carrying value of our investment securities may need to be taken in the future, which wouldcould have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in the policies of monetary authorities and other government action could adversely affect profitability.

The results of operations of the Company are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which we refer to as the Federal Reserve Board. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve Board include open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate or the federal funds rate on bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and monetary policy, we cannot predict the impact of future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the Company’s business and earnings. Furthermore, the actions of the United States government and other governments in responding to developing situations or implementing new fiscal or trade policies may result in currency fluctuations, exchange controls, market disruption and other unanticipated economic effects. Such actions could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and profitability.

22

We are subject to regulation by various Federal and State entities.

The Company and The First are subject to extensive regulation by various regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,FDIC, the OCC, theMississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Financial Protection BureauFinance and the SEC.CFPB. SeeSupervision and Regulation above for more information. New regulations issued by these agencies may adversely affect our ability to carry on our business activities. The Company is subject to various Federal and state laws and certain changes in these laws and regulations may adversely affect operations.

The Company and The First are also subject to the accounting rules and regulations of the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.FASB. Changes in accounting rules could adversely affect the reported financial statements or results of operations of the Company and may also require extraordinary efforts or additional costs to implement. Any of these laws or regulations may be modified or changed from time to time, and we cannot be assured that such modifications or changes will not adversely affect the Company.

The full impact

Tax law and regulatory changes could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes to tax laws, including a repeal of all or part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") on us and our customers is unknown at present, creating uncertainty and risk related to our customers' future demand for credit and our future results.

Increased economic activity expected to result from the decrease in tax rates on businesses generally could spur additional economic activity that would encourage additional borrowing. At the same time, some customers may elect to use their additional cash flow from lower taxes to fund their existing levels of activity, decreasing borrowing needs. The eliminationimplementation of the federalInflation Reduction Act of 2022 ("IRA"), could significantly impact our business in the form of greater than expected income tax deductibility of business interest expense for a significant numberand taxes payable. Such changes may also negatively impact the financial condition of our customers effectively increasesand/or overall economic conditions. Further, future regulatory reforms that could include a heightened focus and scrutiny on BSA/AML related compliance, expansion of consumer protections, the costregulation of borrowingloan portfolios and makes equitycredit concentrations to borrows impacted by climate changes, increased capital and liquidity requirements and limitations or hybrid funding relatively more attractive. Thisadditional taxes on share repurchases and dividends, could increase our costs and impact our business.

On August 16, 2022, the IRA was signed into law in the United States. The IRA includes various tax provisions, including an excise tax on stock repurchases and a corporate alternative minimum tax that generally applies to U.S. corporations with average adjusted financial statement income over a three-year period in excess of $1 billion. We do not currently expect the IRA to have a long-term negativematerial impact on business customer borrowing. We anticipate a significant increase in our after-tax net income available to stockholders in 2018 and future years as a resultfinancial results, including on our annual estimated effective tax rate or on our liquidity, the effects of the decrease in our effective tax rate. Some or all ofmeasures are unknown at this benefit could be lost to the extent that the banks and financial services companies we compete with elect to lower interest rates and fees and we are forced to respond in order to remain competitive. There is no assurance that presently anticipated benefits of the Tax Act for the Company will be realized.

19
time.

We may be required to pay additional insurance premiums to the FDIC, which could negatively impact earnings.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the limit on FDIC coverage has been permanently increased to $250,000, causing the premiums assessed to

The deposits of The First are insured by the FDIC up to increase. Depending upon any future losseslegal limits and, accordingly, subject it to the payment of FDIC deposit insurance assessments. The First's regular assessments are determined by the level of its assessment base and its risk classification, which is based on its regulatory capital levels and the level of supervisory concern that is poses. Moreover, the FDIC has the unilateral power to change deposit insurance fund may suffer, there can be no assurance that there will not be additional premiumassessment rates and the manner in which deposit insurance is calculated and also to charge special assessments to FDIC-insured institutions. The FDIC utilized these powers during the financial crisis for the purpose of restoring the reserve ratios of the Deposit Insurance Fund. Beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023, the FDIC deposit insurance premiums were increased by two basis points. Any future special assessments, increases in order to replenish the fund. The FDIC may need to set a higher base rate schedule or impose special assessments due to future financial institution failures and updated failure and loss projections. Potentially higher FDIC assessment rates than those currently projectedor premiums, or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums could have an adverse impact onreduce our profitability or limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are subject to industry competition which may have an adverse impact upon our success.

The profitability of the Company depends on its ability to compete successfully with other financial services companies. We operate in a highly competitive financial services environment. Certain competitors are larger and may have more resources than we do. We face competition in our regional market areas from other commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions, internet banks, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking firms, and other financial intermediaries that offer similar services. Some of the nonbank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern the Company or The First and may have greater flexibility in competing for business.

Many of these competitors also have broader geographic markets and substantially greater resources and lending limits than The First and offer certain services such as trust banking that The First does not currently provide. In addition, many of these competitors have numerous branch offices located throughout the extended market areas of The First that may provide these competitors with an advantage in geographic convenience that The First does not have at present.
23

Currently there are numerous other commercial banks, savings institutions, and credit unions operating in The First'sFirst’s primary service area.

We also compete with numerous financial and quasi-financial institutions for deposits and loans, including providers of financial services over the internet. Recent technology advances and other changes have allowed parties to effectuate financial transactions that previously required the involvement of banks. For example, consumers can maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and access to lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our competitors have reduced or eliminated certain service charges on deposit accounts, including overdraft fees, and additional competitors may be willing to reduce or eliminate service or other fees in order to attract additional customers. If the Company chooses to reduce or eliminate certain categories of fees, including those related to deposit accounts, fee income related to these products and services would be reduced. If the Company chooses not to take such actions, we may be at a competitive disadvantage in attracting customers for certain fee producing products.
Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.

We necessarily collect, use and hold personal and financial information concerning individuals and businesses with which we have a banking relationship. This information includes non-public, personally identifiable information that is protected under applicable federal and state laws and regulations. As such, we rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, deposit, loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that we can prevent any such failures, interruptions, cyber security breaches or other security breaches or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrenceWe have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to various forms of any failures, interruptions orexternal security breaches, which may include computer hacking, acts of vandalism or theft, malware, computer viruses or other malicious codes, phishing, employee error or malfeasance, catastrophes, unforeseen events or other cyber-attacks. To date, we have seen no material impact on our business or operations from these attacks or events. Any future significant compromise or breach of our information systemsdata security, whether external or internal, or misuse of customer, associate, supplier or Company data could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in additional costs.

It is difficult or impossible to defend against every risk being posed by changing technologies or criminals intent on committing cyber-crime. In the last few years, there have been an increasing number of cyber incidents and cyber criminals continue to increase their sophistication, including several well-publicized cyber-attacks that targeted other companies in the United States, including financial services companies much larger than us. These cyber incidents have been initiated from a variety of sources, including terrorist organizations and hostile foreign governments. As technology advances, the ability to initiate transactions and access data has also become more widely distributed amount mobile devices, personal computers, automated teller machines, remote deposit capture sites and similar access points, some of which are not controlled or secured by us. It is possible that we could have exposure to liability and suffer losses as a result of a security breach or cyber-attack that occurred through no fault of our own. Further, the probability of a successful cyber-attack against us or one of our third-party services providers cannot be predicted, and in some cases, prevented.
Natural disasters, public health emergencies, acts of war or terrorism and other external eventscould affect our ability to operate.

Our market areas are susceptible to natural disasters such as hurricanes and tornados. Natural disasters can disrupt operations, result in damage to properties that may be serving as collateral for our loan assets and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate. Climate change may be increasing the nature, severity and frequency of adverse weather conditions, making the impact from these types of natural disasters on our customers or us worse. We cannot
24

predict whether or to what extent damage caused by future hurricanes, tornados or other natural disasters will affect operations or the economies in our market areas, but such weather events could cause a decline in loan originations, a decline in the value or destruction of properties serving as collateral for our loans and an increase in the risk of delinquencies, foreclosures or loan losses.
In addition, health emergencies, disease pandemics, acts of war or terrorism, trade policies and sanctions, including the repercussions of the ongoing military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and other external events could cause disruption in our operations. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

20

We must maintain effective internal control over financial reporting.

Management regularly monitors, reviews and updates our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal control over financial reporting. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, assurances that the controls will be effective. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could prevent us from accurately reporting our financial results, preventing or detecting fraud, or providing timely and reliable financial information pursuant to our reporting obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business is susceptible to fraud.

Our business exposes us to fraud risk from our loan and deposit customers, the parties they do business with, as well as from our employees, contractors and vendors. We rely on financial and other data from new and existing customers which could turn out to be fraudulent when accepting such customers, executing their financial transactions and making and purchasing loans and other financial assets. In times of increased economic stress, we are at increased risk of fraud losses. We believe we have underwriting and operational controls in place to prevent or detect such fraud, but we cannot provide assurance that these controls will be effective in detecting fraud or that we will not experience fraud losses or incur costs or other damage related to such fraud, at levels that adversely affect our financial results or reputation. Our lending customers may also experience fraud in their businesses which could adversely affect their ability to repay their loans or make use of our services. Our exposure and the exposure of our customers to fraud may increase our financial risk and reputation risk as it may result in unexpected loan losses that exceed those that have been provided for in our allowance for loancredit losses.

We may not be able to attract and retain skilled personnel.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Competition for the best personnel in most activities we engage in can be intense, and we may not be able to hire personnel or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our business because of theirthe difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel with comparable skills, knowledge of our market, relationships in the communities we serve, and years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.experience. Although we have employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, there is no guarantee that these officers and other key personnel will remain employed with the Company.

The failuresoundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company.

Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and potential failurescommercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. We have exposure to different industries and counterparties, and through transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, and other financial intermediaries. As a result, defaults by, declines in the financial condition of, or even rumors or concerns about, one or more financial institutions or the financial services industry generally have led tocould negatively impact market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by the Company or by other institutions.

Recent negative developments affecting the banking industry, and resulting media coverage, have eroded customer confidence in the banking system.
The closures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in March 2023 and First Republic Bank in May 2023, and concerns about similar future events, have generated significant market volatility among publicly traded bank holding companies and, in particular, regional banks like the Company. These market developments have negatively impacted customer confidence in the safety and soundness of regional banks. As a result, customers may choose to maintain deposits with larger financial institutions or invest in higher yielding short-term fixed income securities, all of which could materially adversely impact the Company's liquidity, loan funding capacity, net interest margin, capital and results of operations. While the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC took action to ensure that depositors of these failed banks had access to their deposits, including uninsured deposit accounts, there is no guarantee that such actions will be successful in restoring customer confidence in regional banks and the banking system more broadly.
25

Merger-Related Risks

We may engage in acquisitions of other businesses from time to time, which may adversely impact our results.

From time to time, we may engage in acquisitions of other businesses. Difficulty in integrating an acquired business or company may cause us not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, or other anticipated benefits from any acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition (run-off), loss of key employees, disruption of the Company’s business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. The acquired companies may also have legal contingencies, beyond those that we are aware of, that could result in unexpected costs. The Company may need to make additional investment in equipment and personnel to manage higher asset levels and loan balances as a result of any significant acquisition, which may adversely impact earnings.

21

We may fail to realize the anticipated cost savings and other financial benefits of recent acquisitions in the First Community Bank Acquisition and Sunshine Community Banktimeframe we expect, or at all.

The Company completed the Beach Bancorp, Inc. ("BBI") acquisition on August 1, 2022, and the anticipated schedule, if at all..

The First, First Community Bank, and Sunshine Community Bank have historically operated independently. The successacquisition of the mergers of First Community Bank and Sunshine Community Bank into The First will depend, in part,HSBI on our ability to successfully combine the businesses of The First, First Community Bank, and Sunshine Community Bank. To realize these anticipated benefits, The First expects to integrate First Community Bank’s and Sunshine Community Bank’s businesses with its own businesses. We may face significant challenges in integrating both First Community Bank’s and Sunshine Community Bank’s operations into our operations in a timely and efficient manner and in retaining key personnel from these two banks.January 1, 2023. Achieving the anticipated cost savings and financial benefits of the mergers will depend, in part, on whether we can successfully integrate these businesses.businesses with and into the business of The First. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors, and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.mergers. In addition, the integration of certain operations following the mergers has required and will continue to require the dedication of significant management resources, which may temporarily distract management’s attention from the day-to-day business of the combined company. Any inability to realize the full extent of, or any of, the anticipated cost savings and financial benefits of the mergers, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the combined company.

In addition, Sunshine’s shareholders must approve the transaction before the acquisition of Sunshine Community Bank can be completed, and such shareholder approval may not be received. Failure to complete the acquisition could

We have a negative impact on our reputationincurred and may affect the market price of our common stock.

We willcontinue to incur significant transaction and merger-related costs in connection with the acquisition of Southwest and First Community Bank and the pending acquisition of Sunshine and Sunshine Community Bank.

our recent acquisitions.

We have incurred and expectmay continue to incur a number of non-recurring costs associated with the acquisition of Southwest and First Community Bank and the pending acquisition of Sunshine and Sunshine Community Bank.our recent acquisitions. These costs and expenses include fees paid to financial, legal and accounting advisors, severance, retention bonus and other potential employment-related costs, filing fees, printing expenses and other related charges. Some of these costs are payable by us regardless of whether the acquisition is completed. There are also a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated in connection with the merger and the integration of these companies’ businesses. While we have assumed that a certain level of expenses would be incurred in connection with the acquisitions, there are many factors beyond our control that could affect the total amount or the timing of the integration and implementation expenses.

There may also be additional unanticipated significant costs in connection with the acquisitions that we may not recoup. These costs and expenses could reduce the realization of efficiencies, strategic benefits and additional income we expect to achieve from the acquisition.acquisitions. Although we expect that these benefits will offset the transaction expenses and implementation costs over time, the net benefit may not be achieved in the near term or at all.

22
all, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

We may incur impairment to goodwill.

With

We review our goodwill at least annually. Significant negative industry or economic trends, reduced estimates of future cash flows or disruptions to our business, could indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Our valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires management to make judgements and assumptions based on historical experience and to rely on projections of future operating performance. We operate in a competitive environment and projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from actual results. In addition, if our analysis results in an impairment to our goodwill, we would be required to record a non-cash charge to earnings in our financial statements during the completion of the acquisitions of First Community Bank and Sunshine Community Bank, the market price ofperiod in which such impairment is determined to exist. Any such charge could have a material adverse effect on our common stock may be affected by factors different from those historically affecting our independent operations through The First.

The historic businesses of each of The First, First Community Bank, and Sunshine Community Bank differ in important respects, and accordingly, the results of operationsoperations.

26

Risks Relating to Our Securities

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for investors to resell shares of common stock at a time or price they find attractive.

Our stock price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition to those described in “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” these factors include, among others:

·actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results, financial condition or asset quality;

​ 

·changes in financial estimates or the publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to us or other financial institutions;

​ 

·failure to declare dividends on our common stock from time to time;

​ 

·failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;

​ 

·failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions;

​ 

·strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, restructurings, dispositions or financings;

​ 

·fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors or other companies that investors deem comparable to us;

​ 

·future sales of our common stock or other securities;

·proposed or final regulatory changes or developments;

​ 

·anticipated or pending regulatory investigations, proceedings, or litigation that may involve or affect us;

​ 

·reports in the press or investment community generally relating to our reputation or the financial services industry;

​ 

·domestic and international economic and political factors unrelated to our performance;

​ 

·general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;

​ 

23

actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results, financial condition or asset quality;

·adverse weather conditions, including floods, tornadoes and hurricanes; and

​ 

·geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.

changes in financial estimates or the publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to us or other financial institutions;
failure to declare dividends on our common stock from time to time;
failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, restructurings, dispositions or financings;
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors or other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
future sales of our common stock or other securities;
proposed or final regulatory changes or developments;
anticipated or pending regulatory investigations, proceedings, or litigation that may involve or affect us;
reports in the press or investment community generally relating to our reputation or the financial services industry;
domestic and international economic and political factors unrelated to our performance;
general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;
adverse weather conditions, including floods, tornadoes and hurricanes;
public health emergencies, including disease pandemics; and
disruptions to the financial markets as a result of the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the ongoing military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, terrorism or other geopolitical events.
In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect our stock price, notwithstanding our operating results. We expect that the market price of our common stock will continue to fluctuate and there can be no assurances about the levels of the market prices for our common stock.

General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause our stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.

27

We may need to rely on the financial markets to provide needed capital.

Our common stock is listed and traded on the Nasdaq stock market. Although we anticipate that our capital resources will be adequate for the foreseeable future to meet our capital requirements, at times we may depend on the liquidity of the capital markets to raise additional capital. Our historical ability to raise capital through the sale of capital stock and debt securities may be affected by economic and market conditions or regulatory changes that are beyond our control. Adverse changes in our operating performance or financial condition could make raising additional capital difficult or more expensive or limit our access to customary sources of funding. If the market should fail to operate, or if conditions in the capital markets are adverse, our efforts to raise capital could require the issuance of securities at times and with maturities, conditions and rates that are disadvantageous, and which could have a dilutive impact on our current stockholders. Should these risks materialize, the ability to further expand our operations through organic or acquisitive growth may be limited.

Securities issued by the Company, including the Company’s common stock, are not FDIC insured.

Securities issued by the Company, including the Company’s common stock, are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank and are not insured by the FDIC, the Deposit Insurance Fund,DIF, or any other governmental agency or instrumentality, or any private insurer, and are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

Anti-takeover laws and certain agreements and charter provisions may adversely affect share value.

the price of our common stock.

Certain provisions of state and federal law and our articles of incorporation may make it more difficult for someone to acquire control of the Company. Under federal law, subject to certain exemptions, a person, entity, or group must notify the federal banking agencies before acquiring 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a bank holding company, including the Company’s shares. Banking agencies review the acquisition to determine if it will result in a change of control. The banking agencies have 60 days to act on the notice, and take into account several factors, including the resources of the acquiror and the antitrust effects of the acquisition. There also are Mississippi statutory provisions and provisions in our articles of incorporation that may be used to delay or block a takeover attempt. As a result, these statutory provisions and provisions in our articles of incorporation could result in the Company being less attractive to a potential acquiror.

The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.

Although our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market, the trading volume for our common stock is low relative to other larger financial services companies, and you are not assured liquidity with respect to transactions in our common stock. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the lower trading volume of our common stock, significant sales of our common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause our stock price to fall.

24

You may not receive dividends on our common stock.

Although we have historically declared quarterly cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and may reduce or cease to pay common stock dividends in the future. If we reduce or cease to pay common stock dividends, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

The principal source of funds from which we pay cash dividends are the dividends received from The First. Federal and state banking laws and regulations and state corporate laws restrict the amount of dividends we may declare and loans a bank may make to its parent company. Under certain conditions, dividends paid to us bypay from The First are subject to approval by the OCC. A national bank may not pay dividends from its capital. All dividends must be paid out of undivided profits then on hand, after deducting expenses, including reservesFirst. See “Item 1. Business – Regulation and Supervision” included herein for losses and bad debts. In addition, a national bank is prohibited from declaring a dividend on its shares of common stock until its surplus equals its stated capital, unless the bank has transferred to surplus no less than one-tenth of its net profits of the preceding two consecutive half-year periods (in the case of an annual dividend). The approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, under The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, the banks may not pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, the bank would be undercapitalized.

more information.

If we fail to pay dividends, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock may be the sole opportunity for gains on an investment in our common stock. In addition, in the event The First becomes unable to pay dividends to us, we may not be able to service our debt or pay our other obligations or pay dividends on our common stock and preferred stock. Accordingly, our inability to receive dividends from The First could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of your investment in our common stock.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

28

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None

ITEM2.PROPERTIES

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

The Company’s information security program is designed to protect the security of our computer systems, networks, software and information assets, including customer information. The program is comprised of technical controls, policies, guidelines, and procedures. These technical controls, policies, guidelines, and procedures are intended to align with regulatory guidance, and common industry standard security practices.

The board of directors and our executives appreciate the severity of cybersecurity-related risks and support the continuous development of and investment in the information security program.

Commitment to Security and Confidentiality

At the Company, we expect each associate to be responsible for the security and confidentiality of customer information. We communicate this responsibility to associates during on-boarding and throughout their employment. Annually, training courses are assigned to each associate to complete on how to protect the confidentiality of customer information at the time of hire and during each year of employment.

We regularly provide associates with information security awareness training, including the recognition and appropriate handling of potential phishing emails, which can introduce malware to a bank’s network, result in the theft of user credentials and, ultimately, place customer information at risk.We regularly use phishing campaigns to train associates to determine their ability to recognize phishing emails. For associates who fail a phishing campaign, the associates are assigned additional training courses.

Associates must also follow established procedures for the safe storage and handling and secure disposal of customer information. Old or obsolete computer assets are subject to defined procedures and processes to ensure safe destruction of information contained on those devices. For paper-based information or documents, we dispose of paper using shred bins for destruction.

Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan

As part of our information security program, we have adopted an Information Security Incident Response Plan (Incident Response Plan), which is administered by the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO).The Incident Response Plan describes the Company’s processes, procedures, and responsibilities for responding to incidents including security and cybersecurity. The Incident Response Plan is intended to be followed in the event of a cybersecurity incident, including implementation of (i) forensic and containment, eradication, and remediation actions by information technology and security personnel and (ii) operational response actions by business units, communications, legal, and risk personnel. The Incident Response Plan includes an annual tabletop exercise to simulate responses to cybersecurity events. If applicable, each exercise may result in postmortem and discuss lessons learned to evaluate any improvements to the Incident Response Plan.

The Incident Response Plan includes processes for escalation and reporting of cybersecurity incidents to the Incident Response Team.


Network and Device Security

The Company employs a constantly evolving, defense-in-depth methodology to cybersecurity. Robust high-availability firewalls are in place at the perimeter.Remote workers are supported through the Company’s secure VPN and uses multifactor authentication. The Company has a vulnerability management program in place that includes a managed detect and response platform to ensure monitoring of the Company’s network, ensures the timely installation of software patches, and provides a risk-based approach to addresses vulnerabilities across the network.Network security controls are in place to prevent unauthorized access to the network or the Company’s IT resources. The Company employs controls over its managed workstations, servers, and other endpoints to prevent inappropriate access or damage to physical, virtual, or data assets.Data loss prevention programs are in place to prevent the inappropriate transmission or exposure of sensitive data assets or customer information.
29


Cybersecurity training is provided to all employees as part of the overall cybersecurity program. The Company contracts with third party vendors to conduct internal and external penetration tests against the Company’s networks and IT assets to ensure controls are operating in an appropriate manner.

Impacts of Cybersecurity Incidents

To date, the Company has not experienced a cybersecurity incident that has materially impacted our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. Addressing cybersecurity risks is a priority for the Company, and the Company is committed to enhancing its systems of internal controls and business continuity and disaster recovery plans.

Third-Party Vendor Controls

Before engaging third-party service providers, the Company carries out a due diligence process. This process is led by the Enterprise Risk Management team and Information Security performs due diligence through the process. Risk assessments are reviewed using Service Organization Controls (SOC) reports, self- attestation questionnaires, and other tools.

Any third-party service provider or vendor utilized as part of the Company’s cybersecurity framework is required to comply with the Company’s policies regarding non-public personal information and information security. Third parties processing sensitive customer data are contractually required to meet all legal and regulatory obligations to protect customer data against security threats or unauthorized access. After contract executions, vendors undergo ongoing monitoring to ensure they continue to meet their security obligations.

Our company’sBoard of Directors’ Role in Oversight of Cybersecurity Threats

Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s business and affairs, including risks associated with cybersecurity threats. The Board oversees the Company’s corporate risk governance processes primarily through its committees, and oversight of cybersecurity threats is delegated primarily to our Board Risk Committee.

The Board Risk Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing the Company’s comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management program. The Enterprise Risk Management program assists senior management in identifying, assessing, monitoring, and managing risk, including cybersecurity risk, in a rapidly changing environment. Cybersecurity matters and assessments are regularly included in Board Risk Committee meetings.

The Board’s oversight of cybersecurity risk is supported by our CISO and Cybersecurity Manager. The CISO and the Cybersecurity Manager attend Board Risk Committee meetings, periodically provides cybersecurity and other information security updates to the Board Risk Committee. The CISO also provides an annual information security program summary report to the Board, outlining the overall status of our information security program and the Company’s compliance with regulatory guidelines.

Our Management’s Role in Assessing and Managing Cybersecurity Matters

The Company’s CISO directs the Company’s information security program and our information technology risk management.The CISO and Cybersecurity Manager along with a team of dedicated security personnel examines risks to the Company’s information systems and assets, designs and implements security solutions, monitors the environment, and provides immediate responses to threats.
Role of the Chief Information Security Officer and Cybersecurity Manager

Our CISO is responsible for the Company’s information security program. In this role, the CISO manages the Company’s information security Program.

The CISO has experience with FDIC regulated financial institutions and holds the certification as a Certified Banking Chief Information Security Officer (CBISO) and participates in various Information Security peer groups and serves on the Mississippi Bankers Associations - Information Security Committee.

The Company’s Cybersecurity Manager oversees the day-to-day cybersecurity operations.

30

The CISO and Cybersecurity Manager support the information security risk oversight responsibilities of the Board and its committees. The CISO reports to our Chief Information Officer, who in turn reports to our Chief Executive Officer and President. The Cybersecurity Manager reports to the Information Technology Director, who in turn reports to the Chief Information Officer.

Our Cybersecurity Manager has experience spanning multiple OCC and FDIC regulated financial institutions across the nation. He holds various cybersecurity related certifications and is currently registered with the International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium as a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) member in good standing.

Role of the Enterprise Risk Manager

Our Enterprise Risk Manager is responsible for oversight of the Company’s information technology governance and risk program. In this role, the Enterprise Risk Manager provides independent oversight of information technology risk, promotes effective challenge to the Company’s information technology systems, and ensures that high level risks receive appropriate attention. The Enterprise Risk Manager is a member of the Company’s Risk Management Group and reports to the Chief Risk Officer, who in turn reports to the Board Risk Committee.

Role of the IT Risk Governance Subcommittee

Governance of the information security program begins with the IT Risk Governance Subcommittee, a management level subcommittee, whose objective is to protect the integrity, security, safety and resiliency of corporate information systems and assets. Together, our CISO leads the Company’s IT Risk Governance Committee. The IT Risk Governance Committee meets regularly to review the development of the program and develop recommendations and provides regular reports to management, and, ultimately, the Board Risk Committee through the CISO.

Role of Enterprise Risk Management

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a holistic process to identify, assess/measure, mitigate/control, and aggregate/escalate/report organizational risks, both internal and external, in order to make decisions aimed at maximizing shareholder value and achieving strategic goals.The overarching ERM program shapes information security strategy and development. ERM works with information security management to facilitate performance of Risk Assessments, the results of which are used to identify opportunities to strengthen the program.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our Company’s main office, which is the holding company headquarters, is located at 6480 U.S. HwyHighway 98 West in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. As of year-end, we had 43110 full service banking and financial servicesservice offices, and one motor bank facility as well as fourand five loan production offices. We lease the Hardy Court Branch, the Gulfport Downtown Branch, the Pascagoula Branch, the Ocean Springs Branch, the Fairhope Branch, the Bayley’s Corner Branch, the Theodore Branch, the Dauphin Island Branch, the Baton Rouge Branch,offices across Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and the Pensacola Downtown Branch, which comprise ten of our full services banking and financial services offices. We also lease the Brandon, the Madison, the Ocean Springs and the Slidell loan production offices.Louisiana. Management ensures that all properties, whether owned or leased, are maintained in suitable condition.

The following table sets forth banking office locations that are leased by the Company.
AlabamaITEM 3.Georgia
Theodore - Bayley’s Corner
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Eagles Landing
Dauphin Island
Jonesboro
Fairhope
Mississippi
Spanish Fort
Columbus - Loan Production Office
Florida
Gulfport - Hardy Court
Pensacola - Garden Street
Pascagoula
St. Petersburg - Loan Production Office
Petal
Tallahassee – Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee – Thomasville Road
Tampa - Westshore

31

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time the Company and/or The First may be named as defendants in various lawsuits arising out of the normal course of business. At present, with the exception of the matter described below, the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings that it anticipates may materially adversely affect its business.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Nancy Hall, et al. v. The First Bancshares, Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-192, United States District Court, Southern District of Mississippi.
On December 7, 2023, Nancy Hall, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated ("Plaintiff"), sued The First Bancshares, Inc., as successor in interest to Heritage Southeast Bank, in a putative class action complaint in federal district court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Plaintiff asserts claims based on the alleged improper assessment and collection of overdraft fees. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims relate to overdraft fees resulting from alleged "authorized positive, settle negative" or APSN debit card transactions. The complaint asserts causes of action of breach of contract, including the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. The complaint also asserts a claim for alleged violations of Regulation E of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The complaint seeks an unspecified amount of damages, restitution, costs, attorney's fees, and interest, as well as injunctive relief.
On February 1, 2024, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses, and the proceedings remain ongoing. At this stage of the proceedings, it is not feasible to predict the outcome or a range of loss, should a loss occur, from this proceeding. Accordingly, no accrual has been made and no estimated range of potential loss can be determined at this time.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

25

32


PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information

Our

Shares of our common stock tradesare traded on the Nasdaq Global Marketglobal market under the ticker symbol “FBMS”. The following table sets forth the high and low sales price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market. These prices do not reflect retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions.

          Cash 
    High  Low  Dividends 
    Sale  Sale  Paid 
            
2017 4th quarter $34.35  $29.95  $0.0375 
  3rd quarter  30.35   26.35   0.0375 
  2nd quarter  28.65   27.225   0.0375 
  1st quarter  30.60   27.125   0.0375 
               
2016 4th quarter $28.50  $17.10  $0.0375 
  3rd quarter  19.55   16.99   0.0375 
  2nd quarter  17.72   15.50   0.0375 
  1st quarter  18.50   15.32   0.0375 

“FBMS.”

There were approximately 1,9614,618 record holders of the Company’s common stock at March 13, 2018February 21, 2024 and 12,339,49231,227,881 shares outstanding.

Payment

Subject to the approval of Dividends

the Board of Directors and applicable regulatory requirements, the Company expects to continue its policy of paying regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis. A discussion of certain limitations on the ability of The principal sourcesFirsts to pay dividends to the Company and the ability of funds to the Company to pay dividends are the dividends received from The First, National Banking Association, Hattiesburg, Mississippi. Consequently, dividends are dependent upon The First’s earnings, capital needs, regulatory policies, as well as statutoryon its common stock is set forth in Part 1 – Item 1. Business – Supervision and regulatory limitations. Federal and state banking laws and regulations restrict the amountRegulation of dividends and loans a bank may make to its parent company. Approval by the Company’s regulators is required if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year exceed the total of its net income for that year combined with its retained net income of the preceding two years.

this report.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth shares of our common stock we repurchased during the periodquarter ended December 31, 2017.

2023.
PeriodTotal
Number of
Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs (in thousands) (a)
October$$50,000
November50,000
December85626.9150,000
Total856(b)$26.91 

        Current Program 

 

 

Period

 

 

 

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

  

 

 

Average
Price Paid
Per Share

  

 

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs

  

 

Maximum
Number of
Shares that

May Yet Be

Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs

 
1st Quarter 2017  10,403  $27.65   -   - 
2nd Quarter 2017  1,464   28.65   -   - 
3rd Quarter 2017  -   -   -   - 
4th Quarter 2017  -   -   -   - 
     Total  11,867(a) $28.15   -   - 

(a)Represents shares withheld by the Company in order to satisfy employee tax obligations for vesting of restricted stock awards.

26
(a)On February 28, 2023, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2023 Repurchase Program"), pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $50.0 million in shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock. The 2023 Repurchase Program expired on December 31, 2023.

(b)The 856 shares purchased in the fourth quarter were withheld by the Company in order to satisfy employee tax obligations for vesting of restricted stock awards.

Stock Performance Graph

The following performance graph and related information are neither “soliciting material” nor “filed’ with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference to such filing.

The performance graph compares the cumulative five-year shareholder return on the Company’s common stock, assuming an investment of $100 on December 31, 20112018 and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter, to that of the common stocks of United States companies reported in the Nasdaq Composite-Total Returns Index and the common stocks of the Nasdaq OMX Banks Index. The Nasdaq OMX Banks Index contains securities of Nasdaq- listedNasdaq-listed companies classified according to the Industry Classification Benchmark as Banks.banks. They include banks pro-vidingproviding a broad range of financial services, including retail banking, loans and money transmissions.

 

27

33

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following unaudited consolidated financial data is derived from The First Bancshares’ audited consolidated financial statements as


2152
Legend
SymbolTotal Returns Index For:201820192020202120222023
12..jpg
First Bancshares, Inc.100.00118.55104.82133.07112.80106.66
22..jpg
NASDAQ Composite-Total Returns100.00136.69198.10242.03163.28236.17
33..jpg
NASDAQ OMX Banks Index100.00124.38115.04164.41137.65132.91
Notes:
A.The lines represent monthly index levels derived from compounded daily returns that include all dividends.
B.The indexes are reweighted daily, using the market capitalization on the previous trading day.
C.If the monthly interval, based on the fiscal year-end, is not a trading day, the preceding trading day is used.
D.The index level for all series was set to $100.00 on 12/31/2018.
ITEM 6. RESERVED
34

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Earnings:                    
Net interest income $59,160  $40,289  $36,994  $33,398  $28,401 
Provision for loan Losses  506   625   410   1,418   1,076 
                     
Non-interest income  14,363   11,247   7,588   7,803   7,083 
Non-interest expense  55,446   36,862   32,161   30,734   28,165 
Net income  10,616   10,119   8,799   6,614   4,639 
Net income applicable to common Stockholders  10,616   9,666   8,456   6,251   4,215 
                     
Per  common share data:                    
Basic net income per Share $1.12  $1.78  $1.57  $1.20  $.98 
Diluted net income per Share  1.11   1.57   1.55   1.19   .96 
                     
Per share data:                    
Basic net income per share $1.12  $1.86  $1.64  $1.27  $1.07 
Diluted net income per share  1.11   1.64   1.62   1.25   1.06 
                     
Selected Year End Balances:                    
                     
Total assets $1,813,238  $1,277,367  $1,145,131  $1,093,768  $940,890 
Securities  372,862   255,799   254,959   270,174   258,023 
Loans, net of allowance  1,221,808   865,424   769,742   700,540   577,574 
Deposits  1,470,565   1,039,191   916,695   892,775   779,971 
Stockholders’ equity  222,468   154,527   103,436   96,216   85,108 

28
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following provides a narrative discussion and analysis of The First Bancshares’ financial condition as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.2021. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the supplemental financial data included in Part II. Item 8.-Financial8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included elsewhere in this report.

Critical Accounting Policies

In the preparation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Company'sFinancial Condition and Results of Operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, certain significantwhich have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amounts are based upon judgmentof assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. While we base estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed to be relevant, actual results could differ from those estimates. Accounting policies considered critical to our financial results include the allowance for credit losses and related provision, business combinations and goodwill. The most critical of these is the accounting policy related to the allowance for loancredit losses.
The allowance is based in large measure upon management's evaluation of borrowers' abilities to make loan payments, local and national economic conditions, and other subjective factors. If any of these factors were to deteriorate, management would update its estimates and judgments which may require additional loss provisions.

Companies are required Effective January 1, 2021, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Measurement of Current Expected Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“CECL”), which modified the accounting for the allowance for loan losses from an incurred loss model to perform periodic reviewsan expected loss model, as discussed more fully under Part II – Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note B – Summary of individual securities in their investment portfolios to determine whether decline in the valueSignificant Accounting Policies of this report.

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of a security is other than temporary. A reviewbusiness combination are generally recorded at their fair value at the date of other-than-temporary impairment requires companies to make certain judgments regarding the materialityacquisition. The excess of the decline, its effect on the financial statements and the probability, extent and timing of a valuation recovery and the company’s intent and ability to hold the security. Pursuant to these requirements, Management assesses valuation declines to determine the extent to which such changes are attributable to fundamental factors specific to the issuer, such as financial condition, business prospects or other factors or market-related factors, such as interest rates. Declines inpurchase price over the fair value of securities below their cost thatassets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of identifiable assets, particularly intangibles, and liabilities acquired also require management to make estimates, which are deemedbased on all available information and in some cases assumptions with respect to be other-than-temporarythe timing and amount of future revenues and expenses associated with an asset. Business combinations are recorded in earnings as realized losses.

discussed more fully under Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note C Business Combinations of this report.

Goodwill is assessed for impairment both annually and when events or circumstances occur that make it more likely than not that impairment has occurred. As part of its testing, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount using these qualitative factors, the Company then compares the fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount, and then measures impaired loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Other intangibles are also assessed for impairment, both annually and when events or circumstances occur, that make it more likely than not that impairment has occurred. No impairment was indicated when the annual test was performed in December, 2017.

Goodwill is discussed more fully under Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of this report.

Overview

The First Bancshares, Inc. (the Company)Company was incorporated on June 23, 1995, and serves as a bank holding company for The First, formerly known as The First, A National Banking Association, (“The First”), located in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The First began operations on August 5, 1996, from its main office in the Oak Grove community, which is now incorporated within the city of Hattiesburg. Currently, the First has 57116 locations in Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and Florida.Louisiana. The Company and The First engage in a general commercial and retail banking business characterized by personalized service and local decision-making, emphasizing the banking needs of small to medium-sized businesses, professional concerns, and individuals.

29

35


The Company’s primary source of revenue is interest income and fees, which it earns by lending and investing the funds which are held on deposit. Because loans generally earn higher rates of interest than investments, the Company seeks to employ as much of its deposit funds as possible in the form of loans to individuals, businesses, and other organizations. To ensure sufficient liquidity, the Company also maintains a portion of its deposits in cash, government securities, deposits with other financial institutions, and overnight loans of excess reserves (known as “Federal Funds Sold”) to correspondent banks. The revenue which the Company earns (prior to deducting its overhead expenses) is essentially a function of the amount of the Company’s loans and deposits, as well as the profit margin (“interest spread”) and fee income which can be generated on these amounts.

Highlights for the year:
In the year-over-year comparison, net income available to common shareholders increased $12.5 million, or 19.9%, from $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 include:

·On October 24, 2017, the Company announced the signing of an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Southwest Banc Shares, Inc. (“Southwest”), parent company of First Community Bank, headquartered in Chatom, Alabama. This acquisition closed March 1, 2018, and added 9 locations servicing southwest Alabama.

·On October 31, 2017, the Company completed a sale of an aggregate of 2,012,500 shares of its common stock in a public offering. Net proceeds after underwriting discounts and estimated expenses were approximately $55.2 million.

·On December 6, 2017, the Company announced the signing of an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Sunshine Financial, Inc. (“Sunshine”), parent company of Sunshine Community Bank, headquartered in Tallahassee, Florida. Upon completion, the acquisition will add 5 locations servicing Tallahassee and is expected to close during the second quarter of 2018 subject to Sunshine shareholder approval and customary closing conditions. Regulatory approval was received February 27, 2018.

2022 to $75.5 million for the same period ended December 31, 2023.

Excluding the loans acquired from the Heritage Bank acquisition of $1.159 billion, total loans increased $236.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, representing net growth of 6.3%, as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2022.
Past due loans of $11.7 million to total loans was 0.23% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $6.1 million, or 0.16% for the same period ended December 31, 2022.
Cost of deposits averaged 109 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 26 basis points for the same period ended December 31, 2022.
At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had approximately $1.8$7.999 billion in total assets, an increase of $0.5$1.538 billion

compared to $1.3$6.462 billion at December 31, 2016.2022. Loans, including mortgage loans held for sale and net of the allowance for loancredit losses, increased to $1,221.8$5.119 billion at December 31, 2023 from $3.740 billion at December 31, 2022. Deposits increased to $6.463 billion at December 31, 2023 from $5.494 billion at December 31, 2022. Stockholders’ equity increased to $949.0 million at December 31, 20172023 from $865.4$646.7 million at December 31, 2016. Deposits increased to $1,470.6 million2022. The acquisition of Heritage Bank during 2023 contributed, at December 31, 2017 from $1,039.2 million at December 31, 2106. Stockholders’ equity increased to $222.5 million at December 31, 2017 from approximately $154.5 million at December 31, 2016. The acquisitionsacquisition, $1.565 billion, $1.159 billion, net of Iberville Bankpurchase accounting adjustments, and Gulf Coast Community Bank, which were completed on January 1, 2017, contributed $402.6 million, $237.3 million and $355.6 million$1.392 billion, net of purchase accounting adjustments, in assets, loans, and deposits, respectively.

The First (Bank only) reported net income of $12.6$81.8 million, $11.6$72.6 million and $9.6$73.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, the Company reported consolidated net income applicableavailable to common stockholders of $10.6$75.5 million, $9.7$62.9 million and $8.5$64.2 million, respectively. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and the Company's consolidated financial statements and the Notes thereto and the other financial data included elsewhere.

Results of Operations

The following is a summary of the results of operations byfor The First for(Bank only) the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.

  2017  2016  2015 
  (In thousands) 
          
Interest income $66,061  $44,535  $40,196 
Interest expense  6,049   4,094   3,022 
Net interest income  60,012   40,441   37,174 
             
Provision for loan losses  506   625   410 
             
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  59,506   39,816   36,764 
   
Other income  14,312   10,540   7,589 
             
Other expense  52,999   33,941   31,032 
             
Income tax expense  8,177   4,766   3,701 
             
Net income $12,642  $11,649  $9,620 

30
2021.

($ in thousands)202320222021
Interest income$340,897$200,375$176,735
Interest expense83,63815,08512,306
Net interest income257,259185,290164,429
Provision for credit losses14,500 5,605(1,104)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses242,759179,685165,533
Non-interest income39,72234,28837,362
Non-interest expense177,324122,373108,791
Income tax expense23,35219,03320,210
Net income$81,805$72,567$73,894

36

The following reconciles the above table to the amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015:

  2017  2016  2015 
  (In thousands) 
          
Net interest income:            
Net interest income of The First $60,012  $40,441  $37,174 
Intercompany eliminations  (852)  (152)  (180)
  $59,160  $40,289  $36,994 
             
Net income applicable to common stockholders:            
Net income of  The First $12,642  $11,649  $9,620 
Net loss of the Company, excluding intercompany accounts  (2,026)  (1,983)  (1,164)
  $10,616  $9,666  $8,456 

2021.

($ in thousands)202320222021
Net interest income:
Net interest income of The First$257,259 $185,290 $164,429 
Interest expense7,934 7,474 7,365 
$249,325 $177,816 $157,064 
Net income available to common shareholders:   
Net income of The First$81,805 $72,567 $73,894 
Net loss of the Company(6,348)(9,648)(9,727)
$75,457 $62,919 $64,167 
Consolidated Net Income

The Company reported consolidated net income applicableavailable to common stockholders of $10.6$75.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to a consolidated net income of $9.7$62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022.
Net interest income was $249.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $71.5 million in year-over-year comparison, primarily due to interest income earned on a higher volume of loans (including loans acquired from Heritage Bank and consolidated netBeach Bank).
Non-interest income of $8.5was $46.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2023, an increase of $9.7 million as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2022. Service charges on deposit accounts and interchange fee income accounted for $11.7 million of the increase.
Non-interest expense was $184.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $54.2 million as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2022. The increase in income was partially attributable to an$2.7 million in acquisition and charter conversion charges and $32.1 million in increased operating expenses related to the acquisitions of Beach Bank and Heritage Bank as well as $5.2 million in expenses associated with the U.S. Treasury awards and increases in FDIC premiums of $1.7 million and a $4.9 million increase in core deposit amortization for the year ended December 31, 2023.
The Company reported consolidated net income available to common stockholders of $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a consolidated net income of $64.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. In the year-over-year comparison, Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") loans fee income decreased $9.8 million.
Net interest income increased $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same time period in 2021, primarily due to interest income earned on a higher volume of $18.9 million or 46.8%, an increasesecurities and loans and increased interest rates.
Non-interest income decreased $512 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same time period in other2021. Increased service charges on deposit accounts and interchange fee income of $3.1$2.5 million or 27.7%, which was offset by a decrease in mortgage income of $4.5 million.
Non-interest expense was $130.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $15.9 million as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2021. An increase of $4.8 million in other expenses of $18.6 million or 50.4%. The increase in other expense was primarily due to a charge of $6.7acquisition and charter conversion charges and $3.3 million related to the acquisitions completed in 2017ongoing operations of the Cadence Bank branches and a $2.1$5.1 million charge to income tax expense related to a reductionthe Beach Bank branch operations accounted for the increase in our deferred tax asset resulting from the change in tax rate under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December of 2017.

non-interest expense.

See Note C – Business Combinations in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information on how the Company accounts for business combinations.

37

Consolidated Net Interest Income

The largest component of net income for the Company is net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on assets and interest paid on deposits and borrowings used to support such assets. Net interest income is determined by the rates earned on the Company’s interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the degree of mismatch and the maturity and repricing characteristics of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Consolidated net interest income was approximately $59.2$249.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, as compared to $40.3$177.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was the direct result2022, primarily due to interest income earned on a higher volume of increased loan volumes during 2017 as compared to 2016.loans (including loans acquired from Heritage Bank and Beach Bank). Average interest-bearing liabilities for the year 20172023 were $1,247.8 million$4.935 billion compared to $911.0 million$3.944 billion for the year 2016. At December 31, 2017, the net interest spread, which is the difference between the yield on earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.72% compared to 3.63% at December 31, 2016. The net2022. Net interest margin, which is net interest income divided by average earning assets, was 3.83%3.59% for the year 20172023 compared to 3.71%3.19% for the year 2016.2022. Rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 0.55%1.86% for the year 20172023 compared to 0.47%0.57% for the year 2016.2022. Interest earned on assets and interest accrued on liabilities is significantly influenced by market factors, specifically interest rates as set by Federalfederal agencies. Average loans comprised 74.1%71.4% of average earnings assets for the year 20172023 compared to 73.9%58.0% for the year 2016.

31
2022.

Consolidated net interest income was approximately $40.3$177.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, as compared to $37.0$157.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2021. This increase was the direct result of higher volume of securities and loans and increased loan volumesinterest rates during 20162022 as compared to 2015.2021. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 20162022 were $911.0 million$3.944 billion compared to $822.7 million$3.435 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, the2021. Net interest margin, which is net interest spreadincome divided by average earning assets, was 3.63% compared to 3.65% at December 31, 2015. The net interest margin was 3.71%3.19% for the year 20162022 compared to 3.72%3.21% for the year 2015.2021. Rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 0.47%was 0.57% for the year 2016 compared to 0.39%2022 and remained unchanged for the year 2015.ended 2021. Interest earned on assets and interest accrued on liabilities is significantly influenced by market factors, specifically interest rates as set by federal agencies. Average loans comprised 73.9%58.0% of average earnings assets for the year 20162022 compared to 71.7%60.8% for the year 2015.

2021.

38

Average Balances, Income and Expenses, and Rates. The following tables depict, for the periods indicated, certain information related to the average balance sheet and average yields on assets and average costs of liabilities. Such yields are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of the corresponding assets or liabilities. Average balances have been derived from daily averages.

Average Balances, Income and Expenses, and Rates

Years Ended December 31,
202320222021
($ in thousands)Average
Balance
Income/
Expenses
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Income/
Expenses
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Income/
Expenses
Yield/
Rate
Assets
Earning Assets
Loans (1)(2)$5,036,021 $294,541 5.85 %$3,302,265 $157,761 4.78 %$3,019,605 $151,203 5.01 %
Securities (4)1,918,575 47,913 2.50 %2,023,214 46,305 2.29 %1,305,262 28,035 2.15 %
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks (3)97,183 2,453 2.52 %366,465 50 0.01 %642,042 121 0.02 %
Total earning assets7,051,779 344,907 4.89 %5,691,944 204,116 3.59 %4,966,909 179,359 3.61 %
Other866,869 584,164 526,877 
Total assets$7,918,648   $6,276,108   $5,493,786   
Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities$4,934,875 $91,608 1.86 %$3,943,531 $22,577 0.57 %$3,434,964 $19,681 0.57 %
Demand deposits2,012,129 1,660,696 1,366,529 
Other liabilities77,252 45,065 34,827 
Stockholders’ equity894,392 626,816 657,466 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$7,918,648 $6,276,108 $5,493,786 
    
Net interest spread3.03 % 3.02 %3.04 %
Net yield on interest-earning assets$253,299 3.59 % $181,539 3.19 % $159,678 3.21 %

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  Average
Balance
  

Income/

Expenses

  

Yield/

Rate

  

Average

Balance

  

Income/

Expenses

  

Yield/

Rate

  

Average

Balance

  

Income/

Expenses

  

Yield/

Rate

 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Assets                                    
Earning Assets                                    
Loans (1)(2) $1,168,882  $56,827   4.86% $820,881  $38,497   4.69% $730,326  $34,242   4.69%
Securities (4)  359,195   9,956   2.77%  261,508   6,885   2.63%  256,462   6,759   2.64%
Federal funds sold (3)  47,534   390   .82%  18,806   127   .68%  24,582   64   .26%
Other  2,515   163   .64%  10,029   59   .59%  7,585   93   1.23%
Total earning assets  1,578,126   67,336   4.27%  1,111,224   45,568   4.10%  1,018,955   41,158   4.04%
                                     
Other  185,277           117,735           103,237         
Total assets $1,763,403          $1,228,959          $1,122,192         
                                     
Liabilities                                    
Interest-bearing liabilities $1,247,823  $6,909   .55% $911,037  $4,316   .47% $822,708  $3,208   .39%
Demand deposits (1)  318,339           191,998           196,284         
Other liabilities  26,404           5,601           4,594         
Stockholders’ equity  170,837           120,323           98,606         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,763,403          $1,228,959          $1,122,192         
                                     
Net interest spread          3.72%          3.63%          3.65%
Net yield on interest-earning assets     $60,427   3.83%     $41,252   3.71%     $37,950   3.72%

_________________

(1)All loans and deposits were made to borrowers in the United States. Includes non-accrual loans of $5,674, $3,265, and $7,368, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Loans include held for sale loans.
(2)Includes loan fees of $1,333, $857, and $692, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2016, respectively.
(3)Includes Excess Balance Account-Mississippi National Banker’s Bank and Federal Reserve – New Orleans.
(4)Tax equivalent yield assuming a 35% tax rate.

32
(1)Includes nonaccrual loans of $10,690, $12,591, and $28,013 for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. Loans include held for sale loans.

(2)Includes loan fees of $7,665, $7,453, and $17,138 for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

(3)Includes Excess Balance Account-First National Banker’s Bank.
(4)Fully tax equivalent yield assuming a 25.3% tax rate.
39

Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income. The following table presents the consolidated dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume and to changes in rate. The combined effect in both volume and rate which cannot be separately identified has been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and due to rate.

Analysis of Changes in Consolidated Net Interest Income
Year Ended December 31,
2023 versus 2022
Increase (decrease) due to
Year Ended December 31,
2022 versus 2021
Increase (decrease) due to
($ in thousands)VolumeRateNetVolumeRateNet
Earning Assets
Loans$82,887 $53,893 $136,780 $14,176 $(7,595)$6,581 
Securities (1)(2,405)4,013 1,608 15,436 2,832 18,268 
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks(28)2,431 2,403 (55)(37)(92)
Total interest income80,454 60,337 140,791 29,557 (4,800)24,757 
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-bearing transaction accounts903 19,659 20,562 1,278 (745)533 
Money market accounts and savings491 16,071 16,562 226 819 1,045 
Time deposits2,078 18,160 20,238 294 (52)242 
Borrowed funds10,642 1,027 11,669 241 835 1,076 
Total interest expense14,114 54,917 69,031 2,039 857 2,896 
Net interest income$66,340 $5,420 $71,760 $27,518 $(5,657)$21,861 

  Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
  

2017 versus 2016

Increase (decrease) due to

  

2016 versus 2015

Increase (decrease) due to

 
  Volume  Rate  Net  Volume  Rate  Net 
  (In thousands) 
Earning Assets                        
Loans $18,630  $(300) $18,330  $3,807  $448  $4,255 
Securities  2,461   610   3,071   174   (48)  126 
Federal funds sold  65   198   263   (63)  126   63 
Other short-term investments  57   47   104   4   (38)  (34)
Total interest income  21,213   555   21,768   3,922   488   4,410 
Interest-Bearing Liabilities                        
Interest-bearing transaction accounts  609   562   1,171   207   215   422 
Money market accounts and savings  155   (12)  143   (15)  54   39 
Time deposits  448   55   503   108   313   421 
Borrowed funds  (87)  863   776   77   149   226 
Total interest expense  1,125   1,468   2,593   377   731   1,108 
Net interest income $20,088  $(913) $19,175  $3,545  $(243) $3,302 

(1)Fully tax equivalent yield assuming a 25.3% tax rate.
Interest Sensitivity. The Company monitors and manages the pricing and maturity of its assets and liabilities in order to diminish the potential adverse impact that changes in interest rates could have on its net interest income. A monitoring technique employed by the Company is the measurement of the Company'sCompany’s interest sensitivity "gap," which is the positive or negative dollar difference between assets and liabilities that are subject to interest rate repricing within a given period of time. The Company also performs asset/liability modeling to assess the impact varying interest rates and balance sheet mix assumptions will have on net interest income. Interest rate sensitivity can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, selling securities available-for-sale, replacing an asset or liability at maturity, or adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability. Managing the amount of assets and liabilities repricing in the same time interval helps to hedge the risk and minimize the impact on net interest income of rising or falling interest rates. The Company evaluates interest sensitivity risk and then formulates guidelines regarding asset generation and repricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance sheet commitments in order to decrease interest rate sensitivity risk.

33









40

In the third quarter of 2022, the Company ceased the Deposit Reclassification program it implemented at the beginning of 2020. The program reclassified non-interest bearing and NOW deposit balances to money market accounts. The following tables illustrate the Company'sCompany’s consolidated interest rate sensitivity and consolidated cumulative gap position by maturity at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.

  December 31, 2017 
  

Within

Three

Months

  

After Three

Through

Twelve

Months

  

Within

One

Year

  

Greater Than

One Year or

Nonsensitive

  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets                    
Earning Assets:                    
Loans $214,687  $119,492  $334,179  $895,917  $1,230,096 
Securities (2)  24,716   17,823   42,539   330,323   372,862 
Funds sold and other  475   48,466   48,941   -   48,941 
Total earning assets $239,878  $185,781  $425,659  $1,226,240  $1,651,899 
Liabilities                    
Interest-bearing liabilities:                    
Interest-bearing deposits:                    
NOW accounts (1) $-  $601,694  $601,694  $-  $601,694 
Money market accounts  149,715   -   149,715   -   149,715 
Savings deposits (1)  -   133,864   133,864   -   133,864 
Time deposits  43,171   109,100   152,271   131,032   283,303 
Total interest-bearing deposits  192,886   844,658   1,037,544   131,032   1,168,576 
Borrowed funds (3)  75,000   18,572   93,572   10,500   104,072 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  267,886   863,230   1,131,116   141,532   1,272,648 
Interest-sensitivity gap per period $(28,008) $(677,449) $(705,457) $1,084,708  $379,251 
Cumulative gap at December 31, 2017 $(28,008) $(705,457) $(705,457) $379,251  $379,251 
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets at December 31, 2017  (1.7)%  (42.7)%  (42.7)%  23.0%    

2021. Deposits at December 31, 2021 are shown without reclassification for consistency with the current period presentation.
$ in thousandsDecember 31, 2023
Within
Three
Months
After Three
Through
Twelve
Months
Within
One
Year
Greater Than
One Year or
Nonsensitive
Total
Assets
Earning assets:
Loans$262,916$406,261$669,177$4,503,779$5,172,956 
Securities (2)51,73535,67987,4141,609,4901,696,904 
Funds sold and other130,948130,948130,948 
Total earning assets$314,651$572,888$887,539$6,113,269$7,000,808 
Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
NOW accounts (1)$$1,914,792$1,914,792$$1,914,792 
Money market accounts1,090,4841,090,4841,090,484 
Savings deposits (1)532,827532,827532,827 
Time deposits361,342618,134979,47696,2801,075,756 
Total interest-bearing deposits1,451,8263,065,7534,517,57996,280$4,613,859 
Borrowed funds (3)250,000140,000390,000390,000 
Total interest-bearing liabilities1,701,8263,205,7534,907,57996,2805,003,859 
Interest-sensitivity gap per period$(1,387,175)$(2,492,865)$(4,020,040)$6,016,989$1,996,949 
Cumulative gap at December 31, 2023$(1,387,175)$(3,880,040)$(4,020,040)$1,996,949$1,996,949 
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets at December 31, 2023(19.8)%(55.4)%(57.4)%28.5 %
41

$ in thousandsDecember 31, 2022
Within
Three
Months
After Three
Through
Twelve
Months
Within
One
Year
Greater Than
One Year or
Nonsensitive
Total
Assets
Earning assets:
Loans$180,128$247,781$427,909$3,350,693$3,778,602 
Securities (2)13,56558,43171,9961,876,5891,948,585 
Funds sold and other78,13978,13978,139 
Total earning assets$193,693$384,351$578,044$5,227,282$5,805,326 
Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
NOW accounts (1)$$1,769,699$1,769,699$$1,769,699 
Money market accounts825,813825,813825,813 
Savings deposits (1)542,296542,296542,296 
Time deposits118,108440,087558,195168,200726,395 
Total interest-bearing deposits943,9212,752,0823,696,003168,200$3,864,203 
Borrowed funds (3)130,100130,100130,100 
Total interest-bearing liabilities1,074,0212,752,0823,826,103168,2003,994,303 
Interest-sensitivity gap per period$(880,328)$(2,367,731)$(3,248,059)$5,059,082$1,811,023 
Cumulative gap at December 31, 2022$(880,328)$(3,248,059)$(3,248,059)$1,811,023$1,811,023 
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets at December 31, 2022(15.2)%(55.9)%(55.9)%31.2 %
$ in thousandDecember 31, 2021
Within
Three
Months
After Three
Through
Twelve
Months
Within
One
Year
Greater Than
One Year or
Nonsensitive
Total
Assets
Earning assets:
Loans$147,728$256,450$404,178$2,563,053$2,967,231 
Securities (2)8,95951,45760,4161,713,6421,774,058 
Funds sold and other804,481804,481804,481 
Total earning assets$156,687$1,112,388$1,269,075$4,276,695$5,545,770 
Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
NOW accounts (1)$$1,771,510$1,771,510$$1,771,510 
Money market accounts817,476817,476817,476 
Savings deposits (1)502,808502,808502,808 
Time deposits132,025312,958444,983139,626584,609 
Total interest-bearing deposits949,5012,587,2763,536,777139,6263,676,403 
Total interest-bearing liabilities949,5012,587,2763,536,777139,6263,676,403 
Interest-sensitivity gap per period$(792,814)$(1,474,888)$(2,267,702)$4,137,069$1,869,367 
Cumulative gap at December 31, 2021$(792,814)$(2,267,702)$(2,267,702)$1,869,367$1,869,367 
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets at December 31, 2021(14.3)%(40.9)%(40.9)%33.7 %


42

  December 31, 2016 
  

Within

Three

Months

  

After Three

Through

Twelve

Months

  

Within

One

Year

  

Greater Than

One Year or

Nonsensitive

  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets                    
Earning Assets:                    
Loans $121,391  $88,433  $209,824  $663,110  $872,934 
Securities (2)  10,092   21,376   31,468   224,331   255,799 
Funds sold and other  425   29,975   30,400   -   30,400 
Total earning assets $131,908  $139,784  $271,692  $887,441  $1,159,133 
Liabilities                    
Interest-bearing liabilities:                    
Interest-bearing deposits:                    
NOW accounts (1) $-  $430,903  $430,903  $- ��$430,903 
Money market accounts  113,253   -   113,253   -   113,253 
Savings deposits (1)  -   69,540   69,540   -   69,540 
Time deposits  31,273   93,456   124,729   98,288   223,017 
Total interest-bearing deposits  144,526   593,899   738,425   98,288   836,713 
Borrowed funds (3)  30,000   26,000   56,000   13,000   69,000 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  174,526   619,899   794,425   111,288   905,713 
Interest-sensitivity gap per period $(42,618) $(480,115) $(522,733) $776,153  $253,420 
Cumulative gap at December 31, 2016 $(42,618) $(522,733) $(522,733) $253,420  $253,420 
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets at December 31, 2016  (3.7)%  (45.1)%  (45.1)%  21.9%    

34
(1)NOW and savings accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal and repricing. These deposits do not tend to immediately react to changes in interest rates and the Company believes these deposits are fairly stable. Therefore, these deposits are included in the repricing period that management believes most closely matches the periods in which they are likely to reprice rather than the period in which the funds can be withdrawn contractually.

(2)Securities include mortgage backed and other installment paying obligations based upon stated maturity dates.

  December 31, 2015 
  

Within

Three

Months

  

After Three

Through

Twelve

Months

  

Within

One

Year

  

Greater Than

One Year or

Nonsensitive

  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Assets                    
Earning Assets:                    
Loans $101,160  $76,996  $178,156  $598,333  $776,489 
Securities (2)  14,831   18,100   32,931   222,028   254,959 
Funds sold and other  321   17,303   17,624   -   17,624 
Total earning assets $116,312  $112,399  $228,711  $820,361  $1,049,072 
Liabilities                    
Interest-bearing liabilities:                    
Interest-bearing deposits:                    
NOW accounts (1) $-  $373,686  $373,686  $-  $373,686 
Money market accounts  105,434   -   105,434   -   105,434 
Savings deposits (1)  -   68,657   68,657   -   68,657 
Time deposits  37,222   83,549   120,771   58,702   179,473 
Total interest-bearing deposits  142,656   525,892   668,548   58,702   727,250 
Borrowed funds (3)  81,130   21,191   102,321   8,000   110,321 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  223,786   547,083   770,869   66,702   837,571 
Interest-sensitivity gap per period $(107,474) $(434,684) $(542,158) $753,659  $211,501 
Cumulative gap at December 31, 2015 $(107,474) $(542,158) $(542,158) $211,501  $211,501 
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets at December 31, 2015  (10.2)%  (51.7)%  (51.7)%  20.2%    

(1)NOW and savings accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal and repricing. These deposits do not tend to immediately react to changes in interest rates and the Company believes these deposits are fairly stable. Therefore, these deposits are included in the repricing period that management believes most closely matches the periods in which they are likely to reprice rather than the period in which the funds can be withdrawn contractually.
(2)Securities include mortgage backed and other installment paying obligations based upon stated maturity dates.
(3)Does not include subordinated debentures of $10,310,000.

(3)Does not include subordinated debentures of $123,386, $145,027, $144,592 for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
The Company generally would benefit from increasing market rates of interest when it has an asset-sensitive gap and generally from decreasing market rates of interest when it is liability sensitive. The Company currently is asset sensitive within the one-year time frame.frame based on effective GAP which uses behavioral assumptions that model the rate sensitivity of non-maturity deposits by looking at the deposits’ behavior rather than their contractual ability to reprice. The cash flows used in the analysis are the projected dollars of assets and liabilities that “reprice” (including maturities, repricing, likely calls, prepayments, etc.). However, the Company's gap analysis is not a precise indicator of its interest sensitivity position. The analysis presents only a static view of the timing of maturities and repricing opportunities, without taking into consideration that changes in interest rates do not affect all assets and liabilities equally. For example, rates paid on a substantial portion of core deposits may change contractually within a relatively short time frame, but those rates are viewed by management as significantly less interest-sensitive than market-based rates such as those paid on non-core deposits. Accordingly, management believes a liabilityan asset sensitive-position within one year would not be as indicative of the Company’s true interest sensitivity as it would be for an organization which depends to a greater extent on purchased funds to support earning assets. Net interest income is also affected by other significant factors, including changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

35

The following tables depict, for the periods indicated, certain information related to interest rate sensitivity in net interest income and market value of equity.

December 31, 2017
  

Net Interest

Income at Risk

  

Market Value of Equity

 

 

Change in Interest
Rates

 

 

% Change
from Base

  

 

Bank

Policy Limit

  

 

% Change

from Base

  

 

Bank

Policy Limit

 
             
Up 400 bps  7.7%  -20.0%  40.3%  -40.0%
Up 300 bps  7.7%  -15.0%  36.4%  -30.0%
Up 200 bps  6.3%  -10.0%  28.8%  -20.0%
Up 100 bps  3.8%  -5.0%  17.0%  -10.0%
Down 100 bps  -6.2%  -5.0%  -21.2%  -10.0%
Down 200 bps  -9.2%  -10.0%  -14.3%  -20.0%

December 31, 2016
  

Net Interest

Income at Risk

  

Market Value of Equity

 
Change in Interest
Rates
 

 

% Change
from Base

  

 

 

Policy Limit

  

 

% Change

from Base

  

 

 

Policy Limit

 
             
Up 400 bps  15.4%  -20.0%  22.9%  -40.0%
Up 300 bps  11.8%  -15.0%  18.8%  -30.0%
Up 200 bps  8.0%  -10.0%  13.7%  -20.0%
Up 100 bps  4.0%  -5.0%  7.6%  -10.0%
Down 100 bps  -4.8%  -5.0%  -9.5%  -10.0%
Down 200 bps  -6.6%  -10.0%  -11.6%  -20.0%

December 31, 2015
  

Net Interest

Income at Risk

  

 

Market Value of Equity

 
Change in Interest
Rates
 

 

% Change
from Base

  

 

 

Policy Limit

  

 

% Change

from Base

  

 

 

Policy Limit

 
             
Up 400 bps  11.2%  -20.0%  34.3%  -40.0%
Up 300 bps  8.6%  -15.0%  27.7%  -30.0%
Up 200 bps  5.8%  -10.0%  20.0%  -20.0%
Up 100 bps  2.9%  -5.0%  10.8%  -10.0%
Down 100 bps  -2.7%  -5.0%  -11.5%  -10.0%
Down 200 bps  -4.7%  -10.0%  -10.0%  -20.0%

equity:

December 31, 2023
Net Interest Income at RiskMarket Value of Equity
Change in Interest
Rates
% Change
from Base
Bank
Policy Limit
% Change
from Base
Bank
Policy Limit
Up 400 bps(19.0)%(20.0)%(12.4)%(40.0)%
Up 300 bps(9.1)%(15.0)%(6.7)%(30.0)%
Up 200 bps(2.3)%(10.0)%(2.0)%(20.0)%
Up 100 bps0.7 %(5.0)%0.6 %(10.0)%
Down 100 bps0.5 %(5.0)%(2.4)%(10.0)%
Down 200 bps2.3 %(10.0)%(5.0)%(20.0)%
December 31, 2022
Net Interest Income at RiskMarket Value of Equity
Change in Interest
Rates
% Change
from Base
Bank
Policy Limit
% Change
from Base
Bank
Policy Limit
Up 400 bps(11.3)%(20.0)%(16.6)%(40.0)%
Up 300 bps(6.4)%(15.0)%(10.6)%(30.0)%
Up 200 bps(2.9)%(10.0)%(5.8)%(20.0)%
Up 100 bps(0.9)%(5.0)%(2.2)%(10.0)%
Down 100 bps1.1 %(5.0)%0.9 %(10.0)%
Down 200 bps(0.7)%(10.0)%(2.2)%(20.0)%
43

December 31, 2021
Net Interest Income at RiskMarket Value of Equity
Change in Interest
Rates
% Change
from Base
Bank
Policy Limit
% Change
from Base
Bank
Policy Limit
Up 400 bps11.3%(20.0)%20.0%(40.0)%
Up 300 bps10.2%(15.0)%18.9%(30.0)%
Up 200 bps8.1%(10.0)%15.5%(20.0)%
Up 100 bps4.7%(5.0)%9.4%(10.0)%
Down 100 bps(3.3)%(5.0)%(15.0)%(10.0)%
Down 200 bps(4.6)%(10.0)%(34.2)%(20.0)%
Allowance and Provision for Credit Losses
The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. It is comprised of a general allowance for loans that are collectively assessed in pools with similar risk characteristics and Allowancea specific allowance for Loan Losses

individually assessed loans. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off. The Company has developed policiesallowance is continuously monitored by management to maintain a level adequate to absorb expected credit losses in the loan portfolio.

Management estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information, from internal and proceduresexternal sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for evaluating the overall qualityestimation of itsexpected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio andmix, delinquency level, or term as well as for changes in environment conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, or other relevant factors. Management may selectively apply external market data to subjectively adjust the timely identification of potential problem loans. Management’s judgment as toCompany’s own loss history including index or peer data. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowanceACL quarterly and makes provisions for credit losses based on this evaluation. See Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a complete description of the Company’s methodology and the quantitative and qualitative factors included in the calculation.
At December 31, 2023, the ACL was $54.0 million, or 1.1% of LHFI, an increase of $15.1 million, or 38.8% when compared to December 31, 2022. The 2023 increase is attributable to loan growth and the acquisition of HSBI in January 2023. The Bank acquired loans totaling $1.159 billion, net of purchase accounting adjustments, and recorded initial ACL on PCD loans of $3.2 million related to the HSBI acquisition. In addition, the 2023 provision for credit losses is based upon a number of assumptions about future events which it believes to be reasonable, but which may not prove to be accurate. Thus, there can be no assurance that charge-offsincludes $10.7 million associated with day one post-merger accounting provision recorded for non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments acquired in future periods will not exceedthe HSBI acquisition. At December 31, 2022, the allowance for loancredit losses orwas approximately $38.9 million, which was 1.0% of LHFI. The Company maintains the allowance at a level that additional increasesmanagement believes is adequate to absorb expected credit losses in the loan lossportfolio. The 2022 provision for credit losses includes $3.9 million associated with a day one post-merger accounting provision recorded for non-PCD loans, unfunded commitments. A $1.3 million initial allowance will not be required.

36

The Company’s allowance consists of two parts. The first part is determinedwas recorded on PCD loans acquired in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the FASB regardingBBI merger. Specifically, identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged-off against the allowance.The Company’s determination of this part of the allowance is based upon quantitative and qualitative factors. The Company uses a loan loss history based upon the prior nine years to determine the appropriate allowance. Historical loss factorsallowance; recoveries are determined by criticized and uncriticized loans by loan type. These historical loss factorsgenerally recorded only when sufficient cash payments are appliedreceived subsequent to the loans by loan type to determine an indicated allowance. The loss factors of peer groups are considered in the determination of the allowance and are used to assist in the establishment of a long-term loss history for areas in which this data is unavailable and incorporated into the qualitative factors to be considered. The historical loss factors may also be modified based upon other qualitative factors including but not limited to local and national economic conditions, trends of delinquent loans, changes in lending policies and underwriting standards, concentrations, and management’s knowledge of the loan portfolio. These factors require judgment on the part of management and are based upon state and national economic reports received from various institutions and agencies including the Federal Reserve Bank, United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, meetings with the Company’s loan officers and loan committees, and data and guidance received or obtained from the Company’s regulatory authorities.

The second part of the allowance is determined in accordance with guidance issued by the FASB regarding impaired loans. Impaired loans are determined based upon a review by internal loan review and senior loan officers. Impaired loans are loans for which the Bank does not expect to receive contractual interest and/or principal by the due date. A specific allowance is assigned to each loan determined to be impaired based upon the value of the loan’s underlying collateral. Appraisals are used by management to determine the value of the collateral.

The sum of the two parts constitutes management’s best estimate of an adequate allowance for loan losses. When the estimated allowance is determined, it is presented to the Company’s audit committee for review and approval on a quarterly basis.

Our allowance for loan losses model is focused on establishing a loss history within the Bank and relies on specific impairment to determine credits that the Bank feels the ultimate repayment source will be liquidation of the subject collateral.  Our model takes into account other factors such as local and national economic factors, portfolio trends, non performing asset, charge off, and delinquency trends as well as underwriting standards and the experience of branch management and lending staff.   These trends are measured in the following ways:

Local Trends: (Updated quarterly usually the month following quarter end)

Local Unemployment Rate

Insurance Issues (Windpool Areas)

Bankruptcy Rates (Increasing/Declining)

Local Commercial R/E Vacancy Rates

Established Market/New Market

Hurricane Threat

National Trends: (Updated quarterly usually the month following quarter end)

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

Home Sales

Consumer Price Index (CPI)

Interest Rate Environment (Increasing/Steady/Declining)

Single Family Construction Starts

Inflation Rate

Retail Sales

37
charge-off.

Portfolio Trends: (Updated monthly as the allowance for loan loss is calculated)

Second Mortgages

Single Pay Loans

Non-Recourse Loans

Limited Guaranty Loans

Loan to Value Exceptions

Secured by Non-Owner Occupied Property

Raw Land Loans

Unsecured Loans

Measurable Bank Trends: (Updated quarterly)

Delinquency Trends

Non-Accrual Trends

Net Charge Offs

Loan Volume Trends

Non-Performing Assets

Underwriting Standards/Lending Policies

Experience/Depth of Bank Lending

Management

The bank wide information and metrics, along with the local and national economic trends listed above, are all measured quarterly. Typically, this review is performed during the second month of every quarter to facilitate the release of economic data from the reporting agencies. As of December 31, 2017, most economic indicators pointed to a stable and improving economy thus most factors were assigned a neutral or decreasing allocation factor. In contrast, bank wide factors including the acquisition of new loan portfolios and lending staff through mergers, increased loan production volume causing healthy organic loan portfolio growth, and increasing concentrations in loan types considered to carry higher risk by banking standards, resulted in an increase to the assigned allocation factors related to these areas.

At December 31, 2017, the consolidated allowance for loan losses was approximately $8.3 million, or 0.68% of outstanding loans excluding loans held for sale. Including valuation accounting adjustments on acquired loans, the total valuation plus allowance for loan losses was 1.11% of loans at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses amounted to approximately $7.5 million, which was 0.87% of outstanding loans. The provision for loancredit losses is a charge to earnings to maintain the allowance for loancredit losses at a level consistent with management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan portfolio in light of current economic conditions and market trends. The Company’s provision for loancredit losses was $506,000a $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, $625,0002023 and $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, and $410,000a negative $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2021. A majority of the 2023 and 2022 increase in the Company's provision for credit losses is attributed to the HSBI and BBI acquisitions detailed herein. The overall allowancenegative provision for loan losses results from consistent application of our loan loss reserve methodology as described above. 2021 is attributed to the improved macroeconomic outlook and the Company’s ACL calculation under ASC 326.

At December 31, 2017,2023, management believes the allowance is appropriate and has been derived from consistent application of our methodology. Should any of the factors considered by management in evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for loancredit losses change, management’s estimate of inherentexpected credit losses in the portfolio could also change, which would affect the level of future provisions for loancredit losses.

44

Allowance for Credit Losses on Off Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The ACL on off-balance sheet credit (“OBSC”) exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. The Company maintains a separate ACL on OBSC exposures, including unfunded commitments and letters of credit, which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company's provision for credit losses on OBSC exposures was $750 thousand for the year end December 31, 2023, $255 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2022, and $352 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in the ACL on OBSC exposures for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 was due to the day one provision for unfunded commitments related to the HSBI acquisition and an increase in unfunded commitments.
Non-Performing Assets

A loan is reviewed for impairmentplaced on nonaccrual and the accrual of interest discontinued, when based on all available information and events, it displays characteristics causing management to determine that the probabilitycollection of collecting all principal, interest, and other related fees due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.agreement is not probable. Also at this time, the accrual of interest is discontinued. Alongidentified along with these loans in non-accrualnonaccrual status, allas well as loans determined by management to be labelled as “troubled debt restructure” based on regulatory guidance are reviewed for impairment. Loans that are identified as criticized90 days or classified based on unsatisfactory repayment performance, or other evidence of deteriorating credit quality, are not reviewed until being placed in non-accrual status or when considered to be troubled debt restructure.

greater past due and still accruing interest.

Once these loans are identified, they are analyzedevaluated to determine whether the ultimate repayment source will be liquidation of collateral or some future source of cash flow. If the only source of repayment will come from the liquidation of collateral, impairment worksheetsthey are preparedanalyzed and documented as to document the amount ofwhether any impairment that exists. This method takes into accountconsiders collateral exposure, as well as all expected expenses related to the disposal of the collateral. SpecificIf there is any impairment, specific allowances for these loans are then accounted for on a per loan basis.

38
Loans that are identified as criticized or classified based on unsatisfactory repayment performance, or other evidence of deteriorating credit quality, are not reviewed until they meet one of the three criteria described above.

The following tables illustrate the Company’s past due and non-accrualTotal nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

  December 31, 2017 
  (In thousands) 
  Past Due 30 to
89 Days
  Past Due 90 days or
more and still accruing
  Non-Accrual 
          
Real Estate-construction $192  $27  $92 
Real Estate-mortgage  2,656   177   2,691 
Real Estate-nonfarm nonresidential  1,487   82   1,724 
Commercial  393   -   1,120 
Consumer  57   -   46 
Total $4,785  $286  $5,673 

  December 31, 2016 
  (In thousands) 
  Past Due 30 to
89 Days
  Past Due 90 days or
more and still accruing
  Non-Accrual 
          
Real Estate-construction $204  $96  $658 
Real Estate-mortgage  2,745   102   1,662 
Real Estate-nonfarm nonresidential  269   -   909 
Commercial  9   -   2 
Consumer  22   -   33 
Total $3,249  $198  $3,264 

  December 31, 2015 
  (In thousands) 
  Past Due 30 to 
89 Days
  Past Due 90 days or
more and still accruing
  Non-Accrual 
          
Real Estate-construction $311  $-  $2,956 
Real Estate-mortgage  3,339   29   2,055 
Real Estate-nonfarm nonresidential  736   -   2,225 
Commercial  97   -   100 
Consumer  70   -   32 
Total $4,553  $29  $7,368 

Total non-accrual loans at December 31, 2017,2023, were $5.7$10.7 million, an increasea decrease of $2.4$1.9 million compared to $3.3$12.6 million at December 31, 2016. The majority of the increase was the result of loans acquired from Iberville Bank and Gulf Coast Community Bank. Total non-accrual loans at December 31, 2016 decreased $4.1 million from $7.4 million at December 31, 2015. The majority of the decrease was the result of loans moving to Other Real Estate Owned.2022. Management believes these relationships were adequately reserved at December 31, 2017. Restructured loans not reported as past due or non-accrual at December 31, 2017, amounted to $4.7 million.2023. See Note E – Loans in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a description of restructuredmodified loans.

A potential problem loan is one in which management has serious doubts about the borrower’s future performance under the terms of the loan contract and dodoes not includemeet the categorystandard of special mention.a non-performing asset as outlined by regulatory guidance. These loans aremay or may not be current as to principal and interest and, accordingly,repayment, but they still possess some asset quality characteristics that give management a reason to believe that repayment in full under the contractual terms of the agreement are not included in nonperforming asset categories.possible. The level of potential problem loans is one factor used in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loancredit losses. At December 31, 2017, 20162023 and December 31, 2015,2022, The First had potential problem loans of $18,206,000, $12,297,000$107.1 million and $16,943,000,$108.1 million, respectively.








45

Summary of Credit Loss Experience
Consolidated Allowance for Credit Losses
Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)202320222021 (1)
Average LHFI outstanding$5,036,021 $3,302,265 $3,019,605 
Loans outstanding at year end, including LHFS$5,172,956 $3,778,630 $2,967,231 
Total nonaccrual loans$10,690 $12,591 $28,013 
Beginning balance of allowance$38,917 $30,742 $35,820 
Impact of ASC 326 adoption on non-PCD loans— — (718)
Impact of ASC 326 adoption on PCD loans— — 1,115 
Initial allowance on acquired PCD loans3,176 1,303 — 
Loans charged-off(3,092)(1,218)(6,213)
Total recoveries1,281 2,740 2,194 
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries(1,811)1,522 (4,019)
Provision for credit losses (2)13,750 5,350 (1,456)
Balance at year end$54,032 $38,917 $30,742 
Net charge-offs to average loans(0.04)%0.05%0.13%
Allowance as percent of total loans1.04%1.03%1.04%
Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans0.21%0.33%0.94%
Allowance as a multiple of nonaccrual loans5.05X3.10X1.10 X

(1)Effective January 1, 2021, The increaseCompany adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective approach.
(2)The negative provision of $5.9$1.5 million during 2017 was largely attributable tofor credit losses on the classifiedconsolidated statements of income is net of a $370 thousand provision for credit marks in the Cadence Bank Branches loans acquired infor the Iberville Bank and Gulf Coast Community Bank transactions.

39
year ended December 31, 2022.

Summary of Loan Loss Experience

Consolidated Allowance For Loan Losses

(In thousands)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
                
Average loans outstanding $1,168,882  $820,881  $730,326  $632,049  $583,200 
Loans outstanding at year end $1,230,096  $872,934  $776,489  $706,635  $583,302 
                     
Total non-accrual loans $5,673  $3,264  $7,368  $6,056  $3,181 
                     
Beginning balance of allowance $7,510  $6,747  $6,095  $5,728  $4,727 
Loans charged-off  (405)  (771)  (843)  (1,459)  (759)
Total loans charged-off  (405)  (771)  (843)  (1,459)  (759)
Total recoveries  677   909   1,085   408   684 
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries  272   138   242   (1,051)  (75)
Provision for loan losses  506   625   410   1,418   1,076 
Balance at year end $8,288  $7,510  $6,747  $6,095  $5,728 
                     
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans  (.02)%  (.02)%  (.03)%  .17%  .01%
Allowance as percent of total loans  .67%  .86%  .87%  .86%  .98%
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans  .46%  .37%  .95%  .86%  .55%
Allowance as a multiple of non-accrual loans  1.5X  2.3X  .92X  1.0X  1.8X

At December 31, 2017,2023, allowance as of percent of total loans increased 0.01% to 1.04% when compared to 1.03% at December 31, 2022. The increase is attributed to the increase in loan volume related to the HSBI acquisition and organic loan growth in 2023. At December 31, 2023, nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans decreased 0.12% to 0.21% when compared to 0.33% at December 31, 2022. The decrease is attributed to a $1.9 million decrease in nonaccrual loans mentioned above.

At December 31, 2022, allowance as of percent of total loans decreased 0.01% to 1.03% when compared to 1.04% at December 31, 2021. The decrease is attributed to the increase in loan volume related to the BBI acquisition and organic loan growth in 2022. At December 31, 2022, nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans decreased 0.61% to 0.33% when compared to 0.94% at December 31, 2021. The decrease is attributed to a $15.4 million decrease in nonaccrual loans mentioned above.
The following table represents the components of the allowanceACL for loan losses consisted of the following:

  Allowance 
  (In thousands) 
Allocated:    
Impaired loans $661 
Graded loans  7,627 
  $8,288 

Graded loansyears 2023, 2022, and 2021.

($ in thousands)Allowance for Credit Losses
Allocated:202320222021
Collateral dependent loans$408 $$
Loans collectively evaluated53,624 38,912 30,736 
Total$54,032 $38,917 $30,742 
Loans collectively evaluated are those loans or pools of loans assigned a grade by internal loan review.

40

46


The following table represents the activity of the allowance for loancredit losses for the years 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014,2023, 2022, and 2013.2021.
($ in thousands)Analysis of the Allowance for Credit Losses
202320222021 (1)
Balance at beginning of period$38,917 $30,742 $35,820 
Impact of ASC 326 adoption on non-PCD loans— — (718)
Impact of ASC 326 adoption on PCD loans— — 1,115 
Initial allowance on acquired PCD loans3,176 1,303 — 
Loans charged-off:
Commercial, financial and agriculture(745)(259)(1,662)
Commercial real estate(250)(72)(3,523)
Consumer real estate(49)(204)(473)
Consumer installment(2,048)(683)(555)
Total(3,092)(1,218)(6,213)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:
Commercial, financial and agriculture349 433 433 
Commercial real estate116 591 888 
Consumer real estate249 1,015 311 
Consumer installment567 701 562 
Total1,281 2,740 2,194 
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(1,811)1,522 (4,019)
Provision:
Initial provision for acquired non-PCD loans10,719 3,855 — 
Provision for credit losses charged to expense (2)3,031 1,495 (1,456)
Balance at end of period$54,032 $38,917 $30,742 

Analysis

(1)Effective January 1, 2021, The Company adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective approach.
(2)The negative provision of $1.5 million for credit losses on the Allowanceconsolidated statements of income is net of a $370 thousand provision for Loan Losses

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
  (In thousands) 
    
Balance at beginning of year $7,510  $6,747  $6,095  $5,728  $4,727 
Charge-offs:                    
Real Estate-construction  (143)  (274)  (162)  (47)  (305)
Real Estate-mortgage  (119)  (353)  (372)  (1,156)  (152)
Real Estate-nonfarm nonresidential  (-)   (-)   (-)   (-)   (-) 
Commercial  (62)  (71)  (183)  (89)  (105)
Consumer  (81)  (73)  (126)  (167)  (197)
Total  (405)  (771)  (843)  (1,459)  (759)
Recoveries:                    
Real Estate-construction  280   229   63   96   133 
Real Estate-mortgage  228   519   827   212   393 
Real Estate-nonfarm nonresidential  14   7   15   17   74 
Commercial  50   84   99   15   18 
Consumer  105   70   81   68   66 
Total  677   909   1,085   408   684 
Net (Charge-offs) Recoveries  272   138   242   (1,051)  (75)
Provision for Loan Losses  506   625   410   1,418   1,076 
Balance at end of year $8,288  $7,510  $6,747  $6,095  $5,728 

credit marks in the Cadence Bank Branches loans acquired for the year ended December 31, 2022.

47

The following tables representrepresents how the allowance for loan lossesACL is allocated to a particular loan type as well as the percentage of the category to total gross loans at December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015.

2022.

Allocation of the Allowance for LoanCredit Losses

  December 31, 2017 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
  Amount  % of loans
in each category 
to total loans
 
       
Commercial Non Real Estate $1,608   14.0%
Commercial Real Estate  4,644   64.8%
Consumer Real Estate  1,499   18.9%
Consumer  173   2.3%
Unallocated  364   - 
Total $8,288   100%

  December 31, 2016 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
  Amount  % of loans
in each category 
to total loans
 
       
Commercial Non Real Estate $1,118   15.6%
Commercial Real Estate  4,071   61.6%
Consumer Real Estate  1,589   20.3%

41

($ in thousands)December 31, 2023December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Amount% of loans in
each category to
total gross loans
Amount% of loans in
each category to
total gross loans
Amount% of loans in
each category to
total gross loans
Commercial, financial and agriculture$8,844 15.5 %$6,349 14.2 %$4,873 13.4 %
Commercial real estate29,125 59.2 %20,389 56.5 %17,552 57.0 %
Consumer real estate15,260 24.2 %11,599 28.1 %7,889 28.3 %
Consumer installment803 1.1 %580 1.2 %428 1.3 %
Total loans$54,032 100 %$38,917 100 %$30,742 100 %

Continued:

  Amount  % of loans
in each category
to total loans
 
       
Consumer  155   2.4%
Unallocated  577   0.1%
Total $7,510   100%

  December 31, 2015 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
  Amount  % of loans
in each category
to total loans
 
       
Commercial Non Real Estate $895   17.1%
Commercial Real Estate  3,018   58.4%
Consumer Real Estate  1,477   21.9%
Consumer  141   2.5%
Unallocated  1,216   0.1%
Total $6,747   100%

Non-interest Income and Expense

Non-interest Income.

The Company’sCompany's primary sources of noninterestnon-interest income are mortgage banking operations as well asand service charges on deposit accounts. Other sources of non-interest income include bankcard fees, commissions on check sales, safe deposit box rent, wire transfer fees, official check fees and bank owned life insurance income.

Non-interest income was $14.4$46.7 million at December 31, 2017,2023, an increase of $3.1$9.7 million or 27.7%26.4% compared to December 31, 2016, primarily consisting of increases2022. This increase was partially attributable to $11.7 million in service charges on deposit accounts and interchange fee income, and other charges and fees.a $5.3 million increase associated with the U.S. Treasury awards, offset by a $9.8 million loss on the sale of available-for-sale securities. Non-interest income increased $3.7was $37.0 million or 48.2% for the year endedat December 31, 20162022, a decrease of $512 thousand or 1.4% compared to $7.6December 31, 2021. Increased service charges on deposit accounts and interchange fee income of $2.5 million was offset by a decrease in mortgage income of $4.5 million.
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense was $184.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Deposit activity fees were $7.4 million for 2017 compared to $5.1 million for 2016 and $5.0 million for 2015. Other service charges increased by $0.12023, an increase of $54.2 million, or 17.4%41.6% in year-over-year comparison. The increase was partially attributable to $2.7 million in acquisition and charter conversion charges and $32.1 million in increased operating expenses related to the acquisitions of Beach Bank and Heritage Bank as well as $5.2 million in expenses associated with the U.S. Treasury awards and increases in FDIC premiums of $1.7 million and a $4.9 million increase in core deposit amortization for the year ended 2017 to $0.6 million from $0.5December 31, 2023. Non-interest expense was $130.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and other service charges increased $0.1 million or 12.8% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Mortgage income increased $3.4 million during 2016 due to increased volume from the acquisition of The Mortgage Connection, LLC in December, 2015.

Non-interest expense was $55.4 million at December 31, 2017,2022, an increase of $18.6$15.9 million compared to December 31, 2021. An increase of $4.8 million in year-over-year comparison primarily resulting from increases in salariesacquisition and benefits of $8.4charter conversion charges and $3.3 million of which $6.7 million relatesrelated to the acquisitionsongoing operations of Gulf Coast Communitythe Cadence Bank branches and Iberville Bank. Increases in professional services and other non-interest expense increased $7.0$5.1 million which includes $6.7 million in merger-related costs. Non-interest expense increasedrelated to $36.9 millionthe Beach Bank branch operations accounted for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company experienced slight increasesincrease in most expense categories. Salaries and employee benefits increased $3.6 million in 2016 as compared to 2015, due in part to a full yearnon-interest expense.

48

The following table sets forth the primary components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:

indicated.

Non-interest Expense

  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  (In thousands) 
    
Salaries and employee benefits $30,548  $22,137  $18,537 
Occupancy  4,828   3,459   3,422 
Equipment  1,225   1,262   1,199 
Marketing and public relations  406   465   497 
Data processing  1,039   535   150 
Supplies and printing  640   287   300 
Bank communications  1,296   782   631 
Deposit and other insurance  1,252   1,020   1,051 
Professional and consulting fees  6,757   1,805   1,332 
Postage  546   396   400 
ATM expense  1,188   883   763 
Other  5,721   3,831   3,879 
Total $55,446  $36,862  $32,161 

($ in thousands)Years ended December 31,
202320222021
Salaries and employee benefits$93,412 $73,077 $65,856 
Occupancy17,381 12,854 12,713 
Furniture and equipment3,987 2,981 2,848 
Supplies and printing1,240 967 903 
Professional and consulting fees6,446 3,558 4,035 
Marketing and public relations833 393 615 
FDIC and OCC assessments3,849 2,122 2,074 
ATM expense5,821 3,873 3,623 
Bank communications3,579 1,904 1,754 
Data processing2,771 2,211 1,578 
Acquisition expense/charter conversion9,075 6,410 1,607 
Other36,332 20,133 16,953 
Total$184,726 $130,483 $114,559 
Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense consists of two components. The first is the current tax expense which represents the

expected income tax to be paid to taxing authorities. The Company also recognizes deferred tax for future income/deductible amounts resulting from differences in the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities.

On Income tax expense was $21.3 million for the year ended December 22, 2017,31, 2023, $15.8 million for theTax Cuts year ended December 31, 2022 and Jobs Act was enacted into law. This federal income tax reform, among other things, reduces$16.9 million for the federal corporateyear ended December 31, 2021. The Company’s effective income tax rate from 35%was 22.1%, 20.0% and 20.9% for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The effective tax rate differs each year primarily due to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As a result, the Company revalued its deferred tax assets which was recorded as additional income tax expense of $2.1our investments in bank-qualified municipal securities, bank-owned life insurance, and certain merger related expenses. Income taxes are discussed more fully under Note K – Income Tax in the Company’s statement of operationsaccompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in the fourth quarter of 2017.

this report.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Earning Assets

Loans.Loans typically provide higher yields than the other types of earning assets, and thus one of the Company's goals is for loans to be the largest category of the Company's earning assets. At December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022, and 2015,2021, respectively, average loans accounted for 74.1%71.4%, 73.9%58.0% and 71.7%60.8% of average earning assets. Management attempts to control and counterbalance the inherent credit and liquidity risks associated with the higher loan yields without sacrificing asset quality to achieve its asset mix goals. Loans, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, averaged $1,168.9 million$5.036 billion during 20172023 and $820.9 million$3.302 billion during 2016,2022, as compared to $730.3 million$3.020 billion during 2015.

43
2021.

The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio by category:

Composition of Loan Portfolio

  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  Amount  Percent
Of Total
  Amount  Percent
of Total
  Amount  Percent
Of Total
 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
    
Mortgage loans held for sale $4,790   0.3% $5,880   0.6% $3,974   0.5%
Commercial, financial and agricultural  165,780   13.5%  129,423   14.8%  129,197   16.6%
Real Estate:                        
Mortgage-commercial  467,484   38.0%  314,359   36.0%  253,309   32.6%
Mortgage-residential  385,099   31.3%  289,640   33.2%  272,180   35.1%
Construction  183,328   14.9%  109,394   12.5%  99,161   12.8%
Lease Financing Receivable  2,450   0.2%  2,204   0.3%  2,650   0.3%
Obligations of states and subdivisions  3,109   0.3%  6,698   0.8%  969   0.1%
Consumer and other  18,056   1.5%  15,336   1.8%  15,049   2.0%
Total loans  1,230,096   100%  872,934   100%  776,489   100%
Allowance for loan losses  (8,288)      (7,510)      (6,747)    
Net loans $1,221,808      $865,424      $769,742     

In the context of this discussion, a "real estate mortgage loan" is defined as any loan, other than loans for construction purposes, secured by real estate, regardless of the purpose of the loan. The Company follows the common practice of financial institutions in the Company’s market area of obtaining a security interest in real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan and tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan portfolio component. Generally, the Company limits its loan-to-value ratio to 80%. Management attempts to maintain a conservative philosophy regarding its underwriting guidelines and believes it will reduce the risk elements of its loan portfolio through strategies that diversify the lending mix.

Loans held for sale consist of mortgage loans originated by the Bank and sold into the secondary market. Commitments from investors to purchase the loans are obtained upon origination.

49

The following table sets forth the Company's commercial and construction real estate loansCompany’s loan portfolio maturing within specified intervals at December 31, 2017.

2023.

Loan Maturity Schedule and Sensitivity to Changes in Interest Rates

  December 31, 2017 
Type One Year
or Less
  Over One Year
Through
Five Years
  Over Five
Years
  Total 
  (In thousands) 
             
Commercial, financial and agricultural $42,780  $98,452  $24,241  $165,473 
Real estate – construction  78,917   79,460   24,951   183,328 
  $121,697  $177,912  $49,192  $348,801 
Loans maturing after one year with:                
Fixed interest rates             $198,541 
Floating interest rates              28,563 
              $227,104 

($ in thousands)Due in One
Year or Less
After One,
but Within
Five Years
After Five but
Within
Fifteen Years
After
Fifteen
Years
Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural$209,690 $392,382 $191,341 $6,911 $800,324 
Commercial real estate314,080 1,414,550 1,168,566 161,959 3,059,155 
Consumer real estate129,208 365,095 187,040 571,452 1,252,795 
Consumer installment13,285 39,110 5,125 248 57,768 
Total$666,263 $2,211,137 $1,552,072 $740,570 $5,170,042 
Loans with fixed interest rates:
Commercial, financial and agricultural$130,524 $275,836 $126,964 $5,436 $538,760 
Commercial real estate231,270 1,215,711 717,414 19,742 2,184,137 
Consumer real estate68,229 267,122 104,973 89,254 529,578 
Consumer installment11,987 36,252 4,386 239 52,864 
Total$442,010 $1,794,921 $953,737 $114,671 $3,305,339 
Loans with floating interest rates:
Commercial, financial and agricultural$79,166 $116,546 $64,377 $1,475 $261,564 
Commercial real estate82,810 198,839 451,152 142,217 875,018 
Consumer real estate60,979 97,973 82,067 482,198 723,217 
Consumer installment1,298 2,858 739 4,904 
Total$224,253 $416,216 $598,335 $625,899 $1,864,703 
The information presented in the above table is based on the contractual maturities of the individual loans, including loans which may be subject to renewal at their contractual maturity. Renewal of such loans is subject to review and credit approval, as well as modification of terms upon their maturity.

44

Investment Securities. The investment securities portfolio is a significant component of the Company'sCompany’s total earning assets. Total securities averaged $359.2 million$1.919 billion in 2017,2023, as compared to $261.5 million$2.023 billion in 2016,2022, and $256.5 million$1.305 billion in 2015.2021. This represents 22.8%27.2%, 23.5%35.5%, and 25.2%26.3% of the average earning assets for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively. At December 31, 2017,2023, investment securities, including equity securities, were $372.9 million$1.735 billion and represented 22.6%28.5% of earning assets. The Company attempts to maintain a portfolio of high quality, highly liquid investments with returns competitive with short-term U.S. Treasury or agency obligations. This objective is particularly important as the Company focuses on growing its loan portfolio. The Company primarily invests in securities of U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government agencies, municipals, and corporate obligations with maturities up to fiveten years.

The following table summarizesdetails the carrying valueweighted-average yield for each range of maturities of securities forheld-to-maturity using the dates indicated.

Securities Portfolio

  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  (In thousands) 
    
Available-for-sale         
U. S. Government agencies and Mortgage-backed Securities $201,570  $123,334  $118,536 
States and municipal subdivisions  138,584   98,822   97,889 
Corporate obligations  15,819   20,110   22,346 
Mutual finds  920   940   961 
Total available-for-sale  356,893   243,206   239,732 
Held-to-maturity            
U.S. Government agencies  -   -   1,092 
States and municipal subdivisions  6,000   6,000   6,000 
Total held-to-maturity  6,000   6,000   7,092 
Total $362,893  $249,206  $246,824 

The following table shows, at carrying value, the scheduled maturities and average yields of securities heldamortized cost at December 31, 2017.

Investment Securities Maturity Distribution and Yields (1)

  December 31, 2017 
     After One But  After Five But    
  Within One Year  Within Five Years  Within Ten Years  After Ten Years 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
                         
Held-to-maturity:                                
States and municipal subdivisions $-   -  $-   -  $6,000,000   .93% $-   - 
Total investment securities held-to-maturity $-   -   -   -  $6,000,000      $-   - 
Available-for-sale:                                
U.S. Government agencies (2)  2,995,755   1.05%  1,996,380   1.86%  -   -   -   - 
States and municipal subdivisions.  11,065,790   3.22%  47,779,208   3.27%  47,360,399   3.96%  32,378,641   3.96%
Corporate obligations and other  -       -       11,228,195   2.63%  4,590,713   3.05%
Total investment securities available-for-sale $14,061,545      $49,775,588      $58,588,594      $36,969,354     

2023 (tax equivalent basis):
50

(1) Investments with a call feature


Within One YearAfter One, But Within Five YearsMaturing After Five But Within Ten YearsAfter Ten YearsTotal
Securities held-to-maturity
U.S. Treasury1.48 %1.67 %— %— %1.60 %
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities— %3.49 %3.30 %— %3.34 %
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions1.91 %2.04 %3.96 %4.83 %4.57 %
Mortgage-backed securities - residential— %— %1.61 %2.45 %2.34 %
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial— %2.12 %3.40 %3.86 %3.57 %
Corporate obligations— %— %— %3.13 %3.13 %
Total held-to-maturity1.62 %2.00 %3.71 %4.57 %4.18 %
Mortgage-backed securities are shown as of the contractualincluded in maturity categories based on their stated maturity date.

(2) Excludes mortgage-backed securities totaling $196.6 million with a yield of 2.47% and mutual funds of $0.9 million.

Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

Short-Term Investments. Short-term investments, consisting of Federal Funds Sold, funds due from banks and interest-bearing deposits with banks, averaged $47.5$97.2 million in 2017, $18.82023, $366.5 million in 2016,2022, and $24.6$642.0 million in 2015. At2021. There were no federal funds sold at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and December 31, 2015, short-term investments totaled $475,000, $425,000 and $321,000, respectively.2021. These funds are a primary source of the Company's liquidity and are generally invested in an earning capacity on an overnight basis.

45

Deposits

Deposits

Deposits. Average total deposits at December 31, 20172023 were $1,494.1 million,$6.555 billion, an increase of $473.0 million,$1.127 billion, or 46.3%20.8% compared to 2016.2022. Average total deposits at December 31, 20162022 were $1,021.1 million,$5.428 billion, an increase of $69.5$796.9 million, or 7.3%17.2% compared to $951.6 million$4.631 billion in 2015. 2021.
At December 31, 2017,2023, total deposits were $1,470.6 million,$6.463 billion, compared to $1,039.2 million$5.494 billion at December 31, 2016,2022, an increase of $431.4$968.5 million, or 41.5%17.6%, and $916.7 million$5.227 billion at December 31, 2015. Deposits2021. During January 2023, deposits totaling $1.392 billion, net of $355.6purchase accounting adjustments, were acquired in the Heritage Bank acquisition. During August 2022, deposits totaling $490.6 million were acquired in 2017the BBI acquisition. During December 2021, deposits totaling $410.2 million were acquired in the Cadence Bank branches acquisition.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had estimated uninsured deposits of $2.145 billion and $2.076 billion, respectively. These estimates were derived using the same methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank's regulatory reporting.
In the third quarter of 2022, the Company ceased the Deposit Reclassification program it implemented at the beginning of 2020. The program reclassified non-interest bearing and NOW deposit balances to money market accounts. A distribution of the Company’s deposits showing the year-to-date average balance of deposits by type and weighted-average is presented for the noted periods in the following table. Deposits at December 31, 2021 are shown without reclassification for consistency with the acquisitionscurrent period presentation.
51

December 31,
($ in thousands)202320222021
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Paid
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Paid
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Paid
Non-interest-bearing accounts$2,012,935 $1,660,301 $1,366,529 
Interest bearing deposits:
NOW accounts and other2,017,154 1.41 %1,810,575 0.44 %1,529,293 0.48 %
Money market accounts1,013,701 1.79 %831,463 0.29 %756,951 0.20 %
Savings accounts606,421 0.18 %535,449 0.04 %440,977 0.03 %
Time deposits904,629 2.61 %590,385 0.58 %537,538 0.59 %
Total interest-bearing deposits4,541,905 1.57 %3,767,872 0.37 %3,264,759 0.37 %
Total deposits$6,554,840 1.09 %$5,428,173 0.26 %$4,631,288 0.26 %
The most significant growth during 2023 compared to 2022 was in time deposits. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits and Gulf Coast Community Bank.

total deposits was 1.57% and 1.09% during 2023 compared to 0.37% and 0.26% in 2022. Average cost of interest bearing deposits increased 120 basis points to 1.57% at December 31, 2023 compared to 0.37% during the same time period in 2022. Average cost of total deposits increased 83 basis points to 1.09% at December 31, 2023 compared to 0.26% during the same time period in 2022. The following table sets forthincrease in the average cost of deposits paid on our interest-bearing deposit products in 2023 compared to 2022, is a result of the Company by category for the period indicated.

  Deposits 
    
  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
     Percent
of
     Percent
of
     Percent
of
 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount  Deposits  Amount  Deposits  Amount  Deposits 
                   
Non-interest-bearing accounts $301,989   20.5% $202,478   19.5% $189,445   20.6%
NOW accounts  601,694   40.9%  430,903   41.5%  373,686   40.8%
Money market accounts  149,715   10.2%  113,253   10.9%  105,434   11.5%
Savings accounts  133,864   9.1%  69,540   6.7%  68,657   7.5%
Time deposits less than $100,000  104,648   7.1%  77,893   7.5%  73,868   8.1%
Time deposits of $100,000 or over  178,655   12.2%  145,124   13.9%  105,605   11.5%
Total deposits $1,470,565   100% $1,039,191   100% $916,695   100%

higher average market interest rates. Average cost of interest-bearing deposits and total deposits remained unchanged at December 31, 2022 compared to 2021.

The Company’s loan-to-deposit ratio, which excludes mortgage loans held for sale, was 83.3%80.0% at December 31, 2017, 83.4%2023, 68.7% at December 31, 20162022 and 84.3%56.6% at December 31, 2015.2021. The loan-to-deposit ratio averaged 78.2%76.8% during 2017.2023. Core deposits, which exclude time deposits of $100,000$250,000 or more, provide a relatively stable funding source for the Company's loan portfolio and other earning assets. The Company's core deposits were $1,291.9 million$6.084 billion at December 31, 2017, $894.1 million2023, $5.198 billion at December 31, 2016,2022, and $811.1 million$4.504 billion at December 31, 2015. 2021.
Management anticipates that a stable base of deposits will be the Company's primary source of funding to meet both its short-term and long-term liquidity needs in the future. The Company has purchased brokered deposits from time to time to help fund loan growth. Brokered deposits and jumbo certificates of deposit generally carry a higher interest rate than traditional core deposits. Further, brokered deposit customers typically do not have loan or other relationships with the Company. The Company has adopted a policy not to permit brokered deposits to represent more than 10% of all of the Company’s deposits.

The Company's brokered deposits were 1.8% of deposits at December 31, 2023.

Maturities of Certificates of Deposit

of $100,000$250,000 or More

     After Three       
  Within Three  Through  After Twelve    
(In thousands) Months  Twelve Months  Months  Total 
                 
December 31, 2017 $24,473  $67,469  $86,713  $178,655 

($ in thousands)Within Three
Months
After Three
Through Six
Months
After Six
Through
Twelve
Months
After Twelve
Months
Total
December 31, 2023$103,032 $122,629 $44,767 $22,443 $292,871 
Borrowed Funds

Borrowed funds consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas (“FHLB”), loans from First Horizon Bank, loans from the Federal Reserve Bank, federal funds purchased and reverse repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2017,2023, advances from the FHLB totaled $88.1 million$0 compared to $48.0$130.1 million at December 31, 20162022 and $100.0 million$0 at December 31, 2015.2021. The advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on the first mortgage loans in the amount of the outstanding borrowings, FHLB capital stock, and amounts on deposit with the FHLB. There were $0, $0 and $5.3 million inno federal funds purchased at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, respectively.

46

We hadOn March 12, 2023, the Federal Reserve Board announced the Bank Term Funding Program ("BTFP"), which offers loans to banks with a term up to one reverse repurchase agreementyear. The loans are secured by pledging the banks' U.S. treasuries, agency securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, and any other qualifying asset. These pledged securities will be valued at

52

par for collateral purposes. The BTFP offers up to one year fixed-rate term borrowings that are prepayable without penalty.
In 2023, the Bank participated in the amountBTFP and had outstanding debt of $5,000,000. The agreement was secured by$390.0 million and pledged securities with a fair value of $5,470,105$362.4 million at December 31, 20162023. The securities pledged have a par value of $398.1 million. The Bank's BTFP borrowings, which were drawn between March 15, 2023 and $5,501,503 at December 31, 2015. On September 25, 2017, the underlying securities were repurchased28, 2023, bear interest rates ranging from 4.69% to 4.83% and the agreement was terminated.

are set to mature one year from their issuance date.

Subordinated Debentures

In

On June 30, 2006, the Company issued $4.1 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures of $4,124,000 to The First Bancshares Inc. Statutory Trust 2 (“Trust 2”). The debentures are the sole asset of Trust 2, and the Company is the sole owner of the common equity of Trust 2. Trust 2 issued $4.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust 2.2’s obligations under the preferred securities. The Trust 2 issued $4,000,000 of preferred securities to investors.are redeemable by the Company at its option. The Company makes interest payments and will make principal payments onpreferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures to the Trust 2. These payments will be the source of funds used to retirein 2036. Interest on the preferred securities whichis the three-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") plus 1.65% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly. The terms of the subordinated debentures are redeemable at any time beginning in 2011 and thereafter, and mature in 2036. The Company entered into this arrangementidentical to provide funding for expected growth.

Inthose of the preferred securities.

On July 27, 2007, the Company issued $6.2 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures of $6,186,000 to The First Bancshares Inc. Statutory Trust 3 (“Trust 3”). The Company owns all of the common equity of Trust 3, and the debentures are the sole asset of Trust 3. Trust 3 issued $6.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust 3’s obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities are redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2037. Interest on the preferred securities is the three-month term SOFR plus 1.40% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly. The terms of the subordinated debentures are identical to those of the preferred securities.
In 2018, as a result of the acquisition of FMB Banking Corporation ("FMB"), the Company became the successor to FMB's obligations in respect of $6.2 million of floating rate junior subordinated debentures issued to FMB Capital Trust 1 ("FMB Trust"). The debentures are the sole asset of FMB Trust, and the Company is the sole owner of the common equity of FMB Trust. FMB Trust issued $6.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of FMB Trust's obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities issued by the FMB Trust 3.are redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2033. Interest on the preferred securities is the three-month term SOFR plus 2.85% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly.
On January 1, 2023, as a result of the acquisition of HSBI, the Company became the successor to HSBI's obligations in respect of $10.3 million of subordinated debentures issued to Liberty Shares Statutory Trust 3II ("Liberty Trust"). The debentures are the sole asset of Liberty Trust, and the Company is the sole owner of the common equity of Liberty Trust. Liberty Trust issued $6,000,000$10.0 million of preferred securities to investors.an investor. The Company makes interest payments and will make principal payments onCompany's obligations under the debentures toand related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of Liberty Trust's obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities issued by the Liberty Trust 3. These payments willare redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the source of funds used to retiredebentures in 2036. Interest on the preferred securities whichis the three-month term SOFR plus 1.48% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, the Trust 2, Trust 3, FMB Trust, and Liberty Trust are redeemable at any time beginningnot included in 2012 and thereafter, and mature in 2037.the consolidated financial statements.
53

Subordinated Notes
On April 30, 2018, The Company entered into this arrangementtwo Subordinated Note Purchase Agreements pursuant to provide fundingwhich the Company sold and issued $24.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2028 (the "Notes due 2028") and $42.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.40% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2033 (the “Notes due 2033”). In May of 2023, the Company redeemed all $24.0 million of the outstanding 5.875% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2028.
The Notes due 2033 are not convertible into or exchangeable for any other securities or assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Notes due 2033 are not subject to redemption at the option of the holder. Principal and interest on the Notes due 2033 are subject to acceleration only in limited circumstances. The Notes due 2033 are unsecured, subordinated obligations of the Company and rank junior in right to payment to the Company’s current and future senior indebtedness, and each Note is pari passu in right to payment with respect to the other Notes. The Notes due 2033 have a fifteen year term, maturing May 1, 2033, and will bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.40%, payable quarterly in arrears, for the first ten years of the term. Thereafter, the interest rate will re-set quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate (which is expected growth.

to be three-month term SOFR plus 3.39% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161%), payable quarterly in arrears. As provided in the Notes due 2033, under specified conditions the interest rate on the Notes due 2033 during the applicable floating rate period may be determined based on a rate other than Three-Month Term SOFR. The Company is entitled to redeem the Notes due 2033, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date on or after May 1, 2028, and to redeem the Notes due 2033 at any time in whole upon certain other specified events.

On September 25, 2020, The Company entered into a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with certain qualified institutional buyers pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $65.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 4.25% Fixed to Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030 (the "Notes due 2030"). The Notes due 2030 are unsecured and have a ten-year term, maturing October 1, 2030, and will bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 4.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears, for the first five years of the term. Thereafter, the interest rate will reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate (which is expected to be the Three-Month Term SOFR plus 412.6 basis points), payable quarterly in arrears. As provided in the Notes due 2030, under specified conditions the interest rate on the Notes due 2030 during the applicable floating rate period may be determined based on a rate other than Three-Month Term SOFR. The Company is entitled to redeem the Notes due 2030, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date on or after October 1, 2025, and to redeem the Notes due 2030 at any time in whole upon certain other specified events.
The Company had $123.4 million of subordinated debt, net of deferred issuance costs $1.6 million and unamortized fair value mark $2.1 million, at December 31, 2023, compared to $145.0 million, net of deferred issuance costs $1.9 million and unamortized fair value mark $593 thousand, at December 31, 2022. The decrease in subordinated debt was attributable to the Company's redemption of $24.0 million of its Notes due 2028 and the Company's repayment of $2.0 million of its Notes due 2030 in May of 2023, which resulted in the Company recording a $217 thousand gain on the repurchased debt. The decrease in subordinated debt was partially offset by the addition of $9.0 million, net purchase accounting adjustments, of subordinated debt that the Company acquired as part of the HSBI acquisition.
Capital

The Federal Reserve Board and bank regulatory agencies require bank holding companies and financial institutions to maintain capital at adequate levels based on a percentage of assets and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for risk weights ranging from 0% for U.S government and agency securities, to 600%. for certain equity exposures. In November 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted a rule revising the scope of commercial real estate mortgages subject to a 150% risk weight. Under the risk-based standard, capital is classified into two tiers. Tier 1 capital consists of common stockholders'stockholders’ equity, excluding the unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, minus certain intangible assets. Tier 2 capital consists of the general reserve for loan losses, subject to certain limitations. An institution’s total risk-based capital for purposes of its risk-based capital ratio consists of the sum of its Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. The risk-based regulatory minimum requirements are 6% for Tier 1 and 8% for total risk-based capital.

Bank holding companies and banks are also required to maintain capital at a minimum level based on total assets, which is known as the leverage ratio. The minimum requirement for the leverage ratio is 4%. All but the highest rated institutions are required to maintain ratios 100 to 200 basis points above the minimum. The Company and The First exceeded their minimum regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015.

2021.

54

The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved final capital rules in July 2013, that substantially amended the existing capital rules for banks. These new rules reflect, in part, certain standards initially adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2010 (which standards are commonly referred to as “Basel III”) as well as requirements contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Act.

Under the Basel III capital rules, the Company is required to meet certain minimum capital requirements that differ from past capital requirements. The rules implement a new capital ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. Common equity Tier 1 capital generally consists of retained earnings and common stock (subject to certain adjustments) as well as accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), however, the Company exercised a one-time irrevocable option to exclude certain components of AOCI as of March 31, 2015. The Company will also beis required to establish a “conservation buffer,” consisting of a common equity Tier 1 capital amount equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets to be phased in byeffective January 2019. An institution that does not meet the conservation buffer will be subject to restrictions on certain activities including payment of dividends, stock repurchases, and discretionary bonuses to executive officers.

47

The prompt corrective action rules have been modified to include the common equity Tier 1 capital ratio and to increase the Tier 1 capital ratio requirements for the various thresholds. For example, the requirements for the Company to be considered well-capitalized under the rules include a 5.0% leverage ratio, a 6.5% common equity Tier 1capital1 capital ratio, an 8.0% Tier 1 capital ratio, and a 10.0% total capital ratio. To be adequately capitalized, those ratios are 4.0%, 4.5%, 6.0%, and 8.0%, respectively.

The rules modify the manner in which certain capital elements are determined. The rules make changes to the methods of calculating the risk-weighting of certain assets, which in turn affects the calculation of the risk-weighted capital ratios. Higher risk weights are assigned to various categories of assets, including commercial real estate loans, credit facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property, certain exposures or credit that are 90 days past due or are non-accrual,nonaccrual, securitization exposures, and in certain cases mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets.

The Company was required to comply with the new capital rules on January 1, 2015, with a measurement date of March 31, 2015. The conservation buffer will bewas phased-in beginning in 2016, and will taketook full effect on January 1, 2019. Certain calculations under the rules will also have phase-in periods.

Under this guidance banking institutions with a CETI, Tier 1 Capital Ratio and Total Risk Based Capital above the minimum regulatory adequate capital ratios but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on their ability to pay dividends, repurchase equity and pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers, based on the amount of the shortfall.

Analysis of Capital

        The Company  The First 
  Adequately  Well  December 31,  December 31, 
Capital Ratios Capitalized  Capitalized  2017  2016  2015  2017  2016  2015 
                      
Leverage  4.0%  5.0%  11.7%  11.9%  8.7%  11.4%  13.1%  8.6%
Risk-based capital:                                
Common equity Tier 1  4.5%  6.5%  14.2%  13.8%  8.1%  14.5%  16.2%  11.0%
Tier 1  6.0%  8.0%  14.9%  14.7%  11.1%  14.5%  16.2%  11.0%
Total  8.0%  10.0%  15.5%  15.5%  11.9%  15.1%  17.0%  11.8%

Ratios

  2017  2016  2015 
Return on assets (net income applicable  to common stockholders divided by  average total assets)  .60%  .79%  .75%
             
Return on equity (net income applicable  to common stockholders divided by  average equity)  6.2%  8.0%  8.6%
             
Dividend payout ratio (dividends per   share divided by net income per   common share)  13.5%  9.6%  9.7%
             
Equity to asset ratio (average equity  divided by average total assets)  9.7%  9.8%  8.8%

Capital RatiosAdequately
Capitalized
Well
Capitalized
Minimum
Capital
Required
Basel III
Fully
Phased In
The Company
December 31,
The First
December 31,
202320222021202320222021
Leverage4.0 %5.0 %7.0 %9.7 %9.3 %9.2 %10.7 %11.1 %10.8 %
Risk-based capital:
Common equity Tier 14.5 %6.5 %7.0 %12.1 %12.7 %13.7 %13.8 %15.6 %16.6 %
Tier 16.0 %8.0 %8.5 %12.5 %13.0 %14.1 %13.8 %15.6 %16.6 %
Total8.0 %10.0 %10.5 %15.0 %16.7 %18.6 %14.8 %16.4 %17.4 %
Liquidity and Market Risk Management

Capital Resources

Liquidity management involves monitoring the Company'sCompany’s sources and uses of funds in order to meet its day-to-day cash flow requirements while maximizing profits. Liquidity represents the ability of a company to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss and to raise additional funds by increasing liabilities. Liquidity management is made more complicated because different balance sheet components are subject to varying degrees of management control. For example, the timing of maturities of the investment portfolio is very predictable and subject to a high degree of control at the time investment decisions are made; however, net deposit inflows and outflows are far less
55

predictable and are not subject to the same degree of control. Asset liquidity is provided by cash and assets which are readily marketable, which can be pledged, or which will mature in the near future. Liability liquidity is provided by access to core funding sources, principally the ability to generate customer deposits in the Company’s market area.

48

The Company'sCompany’s federal funds sold position, which includes funds due from banks and interest-bearing deposits with banks, is typically its primary source of liquidity. Federal funds sold averaged $50.0$97.2 million during the year ended December 31, 20172023 and totaled $48.9averaged $366.5 million at December 31, 2017. Also,2022. In addition, the Company has available advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.FHLB. Advances available are generally based upon the amount of qualified first mortgage loans which can be used for collateral. At December 31, 2017,2023, advances available totaled approximately $556.4 million$2.051 billion, of which $110.6$355.2 million had been drawn, or used for letters of credit.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, the market value of unpledged debt securities plus pledged securities in excess of current pledging requirements comprised $95.5$661.8 million of the Company’s investment balances, compared to $100.2 million$1.066 billion at December 31, 2016. The increase in unpledged debt from December 2017 compared to December 2016 is primarily due to an increase in unpledged investments and letters of credit utilized for pledging purposes.2022. Other forms of balance sheet liquidity include but are not necessarily limited to any outstanding federal funds sold and vault cash. The Company has a higher level of actual balance sheet liquidity than might otherwise be the case, since we utilize a letter of credit from the FHLB rather than investment securities for certain pledging requirements. That letter of credit, which is backed by loans that are pledged to the FHLB by the Company, totaled $17.5 million at December 31, 2017. Management is of the opinionbelieves that available investments and other potentially liquid assets, along with the standby funding sources it has arranged, are more than sufficient to meet the Company’s current and anticipated short-term liquidity needs.

The Company’s liquidity ratio as of December 31, 20172023 was 12.8%17.6%, as compared to internal liquidity policy guidelines of 10% minimum. Other liquidity ratios reviewed include the following along with policy guidelines for the periods indicated:

  December 31, 2017  Policy Maximum   
Loans to Deposits (including FHLB advances)  71.1%  90.0% In Policy
Net Non-core Funding Dependency Ratio  5.8%  20.0% In Policy
Fed Funds Purchased / Total Assets  0.0%  10.0% In Policy
FHLB Advances / Total Assets  4.9%  20.0% In Policy
FRB Advances / Total Assets  0.0%  10.0% In Policy
Pledged Securities to Total Securities  77.6%  90.0% In Policy

  December 31, 2016  Policy Maximum   
Loans to Deposits (including FHLB advances)  79.1%  90.0% In Policy
Net Non-core Funding Dependency Ratio  8.3%  30.0% In Policy
Fed Funds Purchased / Total Assets  0.4%  10.0% In Policy
FHLB Advances / Total Assets  3.9%  20.0% In Policy
FRB Advances / Total Assets  0.0%  10.0% In Policy
Pledged Securities to Total Securities  66.6%  90.0% In Policy

  December 31, 2015  Policy Maximum   
Loans to Deposits (including FHLB advances)  75.4%  90.0% In Policy
Net Non-core Funding Dependency Ratio  13.8%  30.0% In Policy
Fed Funds Purchased / Total Assets  0.9%  10.0% In Policy
FHLB Advances / Total Assets  8.9%  20.0% In Policy
FRB Advances / Total Assets  0.0%  10.0% In Policy
Pledged Securities to Total Securities  84.7%  90.0% In Policy

Continued growth in core deposits and relatively high levels of potentially liquid investments have had a positive impact on our liquidity position in recent periods, but no assurance can be provided that our liquidity will continue at current robust levels.

49

December 31, 2023
Policy Maximum
Loans to Deposits (including FHLB advances)79.3 %90.0 %In Policy
Net Non-core Funding Dependency Ratio8.3 %20.0 %In Policy
Fed Funds Purchased / Total Assets0.0 %10.0 %In Policy
FHLB Advances / Total Assets0.0 %20.0 %In Policy
FRB Advances / Total Assets5.0 %10.0 %In Policy
Pledged Securities to Total Securities58.6 %90.0 %In Policy
December 31, 2022
Policy Maximum
Loans to Deposits (including FHLB advances)67.9 %90.0 %In Policy
Net Non-core Funding Dependency Ratio4.4 %20.0 %In Policy
Fed Funds Purchased / Total Assets0.0 %10.0 %In Policy
FHLB Advances / Total Assets2.0 %20.0 %In Policy
FRB Advances / Total Assets0.0 %10.0 %In Policy
Pledged Securities to Total Securities46.9 %90.0 %In Policy
December 31, 2021Policy Maximum
Loans to Deposits (including FHLB advances)55.8 %90.0 %In Policy
Net Non-core Funding Dependency Ratio(14.6)%20.0 %In Policy
Fed Funds Purchased / Total Assets0.0 %10.0 %In Policy
FHLB Advances / Total Assets0.0 %20.0 %In Policy
FRB Advances / Total Assets0.0 %10.0 %In Policy
Pledged Securities to Total Securities48.5 %90.0 %In Policy

The holding company’s primary uses of funds are ordinary operating expenses and stockholder dividends, and its primary source of funds is dividends from the Bank since the holding company does not conduct regular banking operations. Management anticipates that the Bank will have sufficient earnings to provide dividends to the holding company to meet its funding requirements for the foreseeable future.

56

Management regularly reviews the liquidity position of the Company and has implemented internal policies which establish guidelines for sources of asset-based liquidity and limit the total amount of purchased funds used to support the balance sheet and funding from non-core sources.

As of December 31, 2023, the target federal funds rate was 5.25% to 5.50%.

On February 8, 2022, the Company announced the renewal of the 2021 Repurchase Program that previously expired on December 31, 2021. Under the renewed 2021 Repurchase Program, the Company could repurchase up to an aggregate of $30.0 million of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management, less the amount of prior purchases under the program during the 2021 calendar year. The renewed 2021 Repurchase Program was completed in February 2022 when the Company’s repurchases under the program approached the maximum authorized amount. The Company repurchased 600,000 shares under the 2021 Repurchase Program in the first quarter of 2022.
On March 9, 2022, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the “2022 Repurchase Program”), pursuant to which the Company could purchase up to an aggregate of $30.0 million in shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock during the 2022 calendar year. Under the program, the Company could, but was not required to, from time to time repurchase up $30.0 million of shares of its own common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management. The actual timing and method of any purchases, the target number of shares and the maximum price (or range of prices) under the program, was determined by management at is discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The 2022 Repurchase Program expired on December 31, 2022.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 signed into law in August 2022 includes a provision for an excise tax equal to 1% of the fair market value of any stock repurchased by covered corporations during a taxable year, subject to certain limits and provisions. The excise tax is effective beginning in fiscal year 2023. While we may complete transactions subject to the new excise tax, we do not expect a material impact to our statement of condition or result of operations.
On February 28, 2023, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2023 Repurchase Program"), pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $50.0 million in shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock during the 2023 calendar year. Under the program, the Company may, but is not required to, from time to time repurchase up $50.0 million of shares of its own common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management. The actual timing and method of any purchases, the target number of shares and the maximum price (or range of prices) under the program, will be determined by management at is discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The 2023 Repurchase Program expired on December 31, 2023.
On February 28, 2024, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2024 Repurchase Program"), pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $50.0 million in shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock during the 2024 calendar year. Under the program, the Company may, but is not required to, from time to time repurchase up $50.0 million of shares of its own common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management. The actual timing and method of any purchases, the target number of shares and the maximum price (or range of prices) under the program, will be determined by management at is discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The 2024 Repurchase Program will expire on December 31, 2024.

57

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2017,2023, fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Amounts in the table do not include accrued or accruing interest. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in the underlying contracts. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

(In thousands) Note
Reference
 Within One
Year
  After One But
Within Three
Years
  After Three
But Within
Five Years
  After
Five
Years
  Total 
                  
Deposits without a stated maturity G $1,187,289  $-  $-  $-  $1,187,289 
Time deposits G  152,550   105,098   25,628   -   283,276 
Borrowings H  93,572   10,500   -   -   104,072 
Operating lease obligations I  586   257   343   312   1,498 
Capital lease obligations I  275   466   175   -   916 
Trust preferred subordinated debentures N  -   -   -   10,310   10,310 
Total Contractual obligations   $1,434,272  $116,321  $26,146  $10,622  $1,587,361 

($ in thousands)Note
Reference
Within One
Year
After One
But Within
Three Years
After Three
But Within
Five Years
After Five
Years
Total
Deposits without a stated maturityG$5,387,116 $— $— $— $5,387,116 
Time depositsG971,259 73,460 22,510 8,527 1,075,756 
BorrowingsH390,000 — — — 390,000 
Lease obligationsI1,240 2,225 1,825 2,999 8,289 
Trust preferred subordinated debenturesN— — — 25,016 25,016 
Subordinated note purchase agreementN— — — 98,370 98,370 
Total Contractual obligations$6,749,615 $75,685 $24,335 $134,912 $6,984,547 
Subprime Assets

The Bank does not engage in subprime lending activities targeted towards borrowers in high risk categories.

Accounting Matters

Information on new accounting matters is set forth in Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This information is incorporated herein by reference.

Impact of Inflation

Unlike most industrial companies, the assets and liabilities of financial institutions such as the Company are primarily monetary in nature. Therefore, interest rates have a more significant effect on the Company's performance than do the effects of changes in the general rate of inflation and change in prices. In addition, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. As discussed previously, management seeks to manage the relationships between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against wide interest rate fluctuations, including those resulting from inflation.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk Management

Market risk arises from changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The Company does not engage in the trading of financial instruments, nor does it have exposure to currency exchange rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily that of interest rate risk, and we have established policies and procedures to monitor and limit our earnings and balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. The principal objective of interest rate risk management is to manage the financial components of the Company’s balance sheet in a manner that will optimize the risk/reward equation for earnings and capital under a variety of interest rate scenarios.

50

To identify areas of potential exposure to interest rate changes, we utilize commercially available modeling software to perform earnings simulations and calculate the Company’s market value of portfolio equity under varying interest rate scenarios every month. The model imports relevant information for the Company’s financial instruments and incorporates Management’smanagement’s assumptions on pricing, duration, and optionality for anticipated new volumes. Various rate scenarios consisting of key rate and yield curve projections are then applied in order to calculate the expected effect of a given interest rate change on interest income, interest expense, and the value of the Company’s financial instruments. The rate projections can be shocked (an immediate and parallel change in all base rates, up or down), ramped (an incremental increase or decrease in rates over a specified time period), economic (based on current trends and econometric models) or stable (unchanged from current actual levels).

58

We use seven standard interest rate scenarios in conducting our 12-month net interest income simulations: “static,” upward shocks of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points, and downward shocks of 100, and 200 basis points. Pursuant to policy guidelines, we typically attempt to limit the projected decline in net interest income relative to the stable rate scenario to no more than 5% for a 100 basis100-basis point (bp) interest rate shock, 10% for a 200 bp shock, 15% for a 300 bp shock, and 20% for a 400 bp shock. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had the following estimated net interest income, sensitivity profiles, without factoring in any potential negative impact on spreads resulting from competitive pressures or credit quality deterioration:

December 31, 2017 Net Interest Income at Risk – Sensitivity Year 1 
($ In Thousands) -200 bp  -100 bp  STATIC  +100 bp  +200 bp  +300 bp  +400 bp 
                      
Net Interest Income  54,702   56,491   60,023   61,041   60,588   58,764   55,384 
Dollar Change  -5,321   -3,532       1,018   565   -1,259   -4,639 
NII @ Risk - Sensitivity Y1  -8.9%  -5.9%      1.7%  0.9%  -2.1%  -7.7%

December 31, 2023Net Interest Income at Risk – Sensitivity Year 1
($ in thousands) -200 bp-100 bpSTATIC +100 bp+200 bp+300 bp+400 bp
Net Interest Income236,936 232,589 231,521 233,208 226,151 210,556 187,595 
Dollar Change5,415 1,068 1,687 (5,370)(20,965)(43,926)
NII @ Risk - Sensitivity Year 12.3 %0.5 %0.7 %(2.3)%(9.1)%(19.0)%
If there were an immediate and sustained downward adjustment of 200 basis points in interest rates, all else being equal, net interest income over the next twelve months would likely be approximately $5.3$5.4 million lowerhigher than in a stable interest rate scenario, for a negative variance of 8.9%2.3%. The unfavorable variance increases if rates were to drop below 200 basis points, due to the fact that certain deposit rates are already relatively low (on NOW accounts and savings accounts, for example), and will hit a natural floor of close to zero while non-floored variable-rate loan yields continue to drop. This effect is exacerbated by accelerated prepayments on fixed-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities when rates decline, although rate floors on some of our variable-rate loans partially offset other negative pressures. While we view further interest rate reductions as highly unlikely, the potential percentage drop in net interest income exceeds our internal policy guidelines in declining interest rate scenarios and we will continue to monitor our interest rate risk profile and take corrective action as deemed appropriate.

Net interest income would likely improvedecrease by $0.5$5.4 million, or 0.9%(2.3)%, if interest rates were to increase by 200 basis points relative to a stable interest rate scenario, with the favorable variance expanding the higher interest rates rise.scenario. The initial increase in rising rate scenarios will be limited to some extent by the fact that some of our variable-rate loans are currently at rate floors, resulting in a re-pricing lag while base rates are increasing to floored levels, but we believe the Company still would benefit from a material upward shift in the yield curve.

The Company’s one yearone-year cumulative GAP ratio was approximately 221.83%118.0% at December 31, 2017 and 199.4%2023, 180.0% at December 31, 2016,2022 and 164.5% at December 31, 2021. The Company is considered “asset-sensitive” which means that there are more assets repricing than liabilities within the first year. The Company is “asset-sensitive.” The Company’s one year cumulative GAP ratio was approximately 168.3% at December 31, 2015, which meant that there were more liabilities repricing than assets within the first year. These results are based on cash flows from assumptions of assets and liabilities that reprice (maturities, likely calls, prepayments, etc.) Typically, the net interest income of asset-sensitive companies should improve with rising rates and decrease with declining rates.

In addition to the net interest income simulations shown above, we run stress scenarios modeling the possibility of no balance sheet growth, the potential runoff of “surge” core deposits which flowed into the Company in the most recent economic cycle, and potential unfavorable movement in deposit rates relative to yields on earning assets. Even though net interest income will naturally be lower with no balance sheet growth, the rate-driven variances projected for net interest income in a static growth environment are similar to the changes noted above for our standard projections. When a greater level of non-maturity deposit runoff is assumed or unfavorable deposit rate changes are factored into the model, projected net interest income in declining rate and flat rate scenarios does not change materially relative to standard growth projections. However, the benefit we would otherwise experience in rising rate scenarios is minimized and net interest income remains relatively flat.

51

The economic value (or “fair value”) of financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet will also vary under the interest rate scenarios previously discussed. The difference between the projected fair value of the Company’s financial assets and the fair value of its financial liabilities is referred to as the economic value of equity (“EVE”), and changes in EVE under different interest rate scenarios are effectively a gauge of the Company’s longer-term exposure to interest rate risk. Fair values for financial instruments are estimated by discounting projected cash flows (principal and interest) at projected replacement interest rates for each account type, while the fair value of non-financial accounts is assumed to equal their book value for all rate scenarios. An economic value simulation is a static measure utilizing balance sheet accounts at a given point in time, and the measurement can change substantially over time as the characteristics of the Company’s balance sheet evolve and interest rate and yield curve assumptions are updated.

59

The change in economic value under different interest rate scenarios depends on the characteristics of each class of financial instrument, including stated interest rates or spreads relative to current or projected market-level interest rates or spreads, the likelihood of principal prepayments, whether contractual interest rates are fixed or floating, and the average remaining time to maturity. As a general rule, fixed-rate financial assets become more valuable in declining rate scenarios and less valuable in rising rate scenarios, while fixed-rate financial liabilities gain in value as interest rates rise and lose value as interest rates decline. The longer the duration of the financial instrument, the greater the impact a rate change will have on its value. In our economic value simulations, estimated prepayments are factored in for financial instruments with stated maturity dates, and decay rates for non-maturity deposits are projected based on historical patterns and Management’smanagement’s best estimates. The table below shows estimated changes in the Company’s EVE as of the periods indicated under different interest rate scenarios relative to a base case of current interest rates:

  December 31, 2017 - Balance Sheet Shock 
(Dollars in thousands) -200 bp  -100 bp  STATIC
(Base)
  +100 bp  +200 bp  +300 bp  +400 bp 
                      
Market Value of Equity  274,743   252,585   320,631   375,144   412,957   437,500   449,926 
Change in EVE from base  -45,888   -68,046       54,513   92,326   116,896   129,295 
% Change  -14.3%  -21.2%      17.0%  28.8%  36.5%  40.3%
Policy Limits  -20.0%  -10.0%      -10.0%  -20.0%  -30.0%  -40.0%

  December 31, 2016 - Balance Sheet Shock 
(Dollars in thousands) -200 bp  -100 bp  STATIC
(Base)
  +100 bp  +200 bp  +300 bp  +400 bp 
                      
Market Value of Equity  315,609   323,038   356,983   384,268   406,044   424,054   438,668 
Change in EVE from base  -41,374   -33,945       27,285   49,061   67,071   81,685 
% Change  -11.6%  -9.5%      7.6%  13.7%  18.8%  22.9%
Policy Limits  -20.00%  -10.00%      -10.00%  -20.00%  -30.00%  -40.00%

The tables show that our EVE will generally deteriorate in declining rate scenarios, but should benefit from a parallel shift upward in the yield curve. As noted previously, however, Management is of the opinion that the potential for a significant rate decline is low.

December 31, 2023 - Balance Sheet Shock
($ in thousands)-200 bp-100 bpSTATIC
(Base)
+100 bp+200 bp+300 bp+400 bp
Market Value of Equity1,286,790 1,321,286 1,354,363 1,362,597 1,327,813 1,263,361 1,187,080 
Change in EVE from base(67,573)(33,077)8,234 (26,550)(91,002)(167,283)
% Change(5.0)%(2.4)%0.6 %(2.0)%(6.7)%(12.4)%
Policy Limits(20.0)%(10.0)%(10.0)%(20.0)%(30.0)%(40.0)%
December 31, 2022 - Balance Sheet Shock
($ in thousands)-200 bp-100 bpSTATIC
(Base)
+100 bp+200 bp+300 bp+400 bp
Market Value of Equity1,366,982 1,410,341 1,397,164 1,366,639 1,316,226 1,248,624 1,165,069 
Change in EVE from base(30,182)13,177 (30,525)(80,938)(148,540)(232,095)
% Change(2.2)%0.9 %(2.2)%(5.8)%(10.6)%(16.6)%
Policy Limits(20.0)%(10.0)%(10.0)%(20.0)%(30.0)%(40.0)%
We also run stress scenarios for EVE to simulate the possibility of higher loan prepayment rates, unfavorable changes in deposit rates, and higher deposit decay rates. Model results are highly sensitive to changes in assumed decay rates for non-maturity deposits, in particular.

52


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM













60

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders, Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Audit Committee

The First Bancshares, Inc.

Hattiesburg, Mississippi


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The First Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income changes in(loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with theaccounting principles generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)(COSO) and our report dated March 16, 2018,February 29, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

53


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures includedinclude examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/T.E. Lott & Company


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company’s loan portfolio totaled $5.17 billion as of December 31, 2023, and the allowance for credit losses on loans was $54 million. The Company’s unfunded loan commitments totaled $866 million, with an allowance for credit loss of $2.1 million. Together these amounts represent the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”).

As more fully described in Notes B, E and Q to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company estimates its exposure to expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date, for existing financial instruments held at amortized cost, and off-balance sheet exposures, such as unfunded loan commitments, letters of credit and other financial guarantees that are not unconditionally cancellable by the Company.

61

The determination of the ACL requires management to exercise significant judgment and consider numerous subjective factors, including determining qualitative factors utilized to adjust historical loss rates, loan credit risk grading and identifying loans requiring individual evaluation among others. As disclosed by management, different assumptions and conditions could result in a materially different amount for the estimate of the ACL.

We identified the valuation of the ACL as a critical audit matter. Auditing the ACL involved a high degree of subjectivity in evaluating management’s estimates, such as evaluating management's identification of credit quality indicators, grouping of loans determined to be similar into pools, estimating the remaining life of loans in a pool, assessment of economic conditions and other environmental factors, evaluating the adequacy of specific allowances associated with individually evaluated loans and assessing the appropriateness of loan credit risk grades.

The primary procedures we performed as of December 31, 2023, to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls, including those related to technology, over the allowance for credit losses including:

loan data completeness and accuracy,

classifications of loans by loan segment,

verification of historical net loss data and calculated net loss rates,

the establishment of qualitative adjustments,

credit ratings and risk classification of loans,

establishment of specific reserves on individually evaluated loans,

and management’s review and disclosure controls over the allowance for credit losses;

Testing of completeness and accuracy of the information utilized in the allowance for credit losses;

Testing the allowance for credit losses model’s computational accuracy;

Evaluating the qualitative adjustments, including assessing the basis for the adjustments and the reasonableness of the significant assumptions;

Testing the loan review function and evaluating the accuracy of loan credit ratings;

Evaluating the reasonableness of specific allowances on individually evaluated loans;

Evaluating the overall reasonableness of assumptions used by management considering the past performance of the Company;

Evaluating the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

Acquisition

As described in Note C to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company consummated the acquisition of Heritage Southeast Bancorporation, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Heritage Bank, resulting in goodwill of approximately $91.9 million being recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. As part of the acquisition, management assessed that the acquisition qualified as a business combination and all identifiable assets and liabilities acquired were valued at fair value as part of the purchase price allocation as of the acquisition date. The identification and valuation of such acquired assets and assumed liabilities requires management to exercise significant judgment. Management utilized outside vendors to assist with estimating the fair value.

We identified the consummated acquisition and the valuation of acquired assets and assumed liabilities as a critical audit matter. Auditing the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and other acquisition-related considerations involved a high degree of subjectivity in evaluating management’s fair value estimates and purchase price allocations.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

62

Obtained and read the executed Agreement and Plan of Merger documents to gain an understanding of the underlying terms of the consummated acquisition;

Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls including:

Evaluating the significant assumptions used for valuing significant assets and liabilities assumed;

Assessed management’s application of accounting guidance related to the business combination and management’s determination of whether the transaction was an acquisition of a business as defined within the ASC 805, Business Combinations, framework;

Assessed the completeness and accuracy of management’s purchase accounting model, including the balance sheet acquired and related fair value purchase price allocations made to identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed;

Obtained and evaluated significant outside vendor valuation estimates, and challenging management’s review of the appropriateness of the valuations including but not limited to, testing critical inputs, assumptions applied and valuation models utilized by the outside vendors;

Utilized internal valuation specialists to assist with testing the related fair value estimates;

Tested the completeness and accuracy of management’s calculation of total consideration paid;

Tested the accuracy of the goodwill calculation resulting from the acquisition, which was the difference between the total consideration paid and the fair value of the net assets acquired;

Read and evaluated the adequacy of the disclosures made in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


/s/ FORVIS, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditorsauditor since 1996.

Columbus,2021.

Jackson, Mississippi

March 16, 2018

54

February 29, 2024

63

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 20172023 AND 2016

  2017  2016 
ASSETS      
Cash and due from banks $42,980,353  $31,719,187 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks  48,466,424   29,974,698 
Federal funds sold  475,000   425,000 
Total cash and cash equivalents  91,921,777   62,118,885 
Held-to-maturity securities (fair value of $7,397,966 in 2017 and $7,393,828 in 2016)  6,000,000   6,000,000 
Available-for-sale securities  356,893,081   243,205,963 
Other securities  9,969,200   6,592,750 
Total securities  372,862,281   255,798,713 
Loans held for sale  4,790,049   5,879,884 
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $8,288,009 in 2017 and $7,510,314 in 2016  1,217,017,663   859,543,789 
Interest receivable  6,704,915   4,358,098 
Premises and equipment  46,426,031   34,624,352 
Cash surrender value of life insurance  27,053,909   21,250,476 
Goodwill  19,959,849   13,776,040 
Other real estate owned  7,158,409   6,007,621 
Other assets  19,343,560   14,009,388 
Total assets $1,813,238,443  $1,277,367,246 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
Deposits:        
Non-interest-bearing $301,988,781  $202,478,442 
Interest-bearing  1,168,575,736   836,712,820 
Total deposits  1,470,564,517   1,039,191,262 
Interest payable  353,143   306,080 
Borrowed funds  104,072,294   69,000,000 
Subordinated debentures  10,310,000   10,310,000 
Other liabilities  5,470,569   4,033,197 
Total liabilities  1,590,770,523   1,122,840,539 
Stockholders’ Equity:        
Common stock, par value $1 per share: 20,000,000 shares authorized; 11,192,401 shares issued in 2017, and 9,017,891 shares issued in 2016, respectively  11,192,401   9,017,891 
Additional paid-in capital  158,455,979   102,574,159 
Retained earnings  53,720,927   44,476,386 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (437,742)  (1,078,084)
Treasury stock, at cost  (463,645)  (463,645)
Total stockholders’ equity  222,467,920   154,526,707 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,813,238,443  $1,277,367,246 

2022

($ in thousands except per share data)
20232022
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks$224,199 $67,176 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks130,948 78,139 
Total cash and cash equivalents355,147 145,315 
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost: $1,164,227 in 2023; $1,418,337 in 2022; allowance for credit losses: $0 in both 2023 and 2022)1,042,365 1,257,101 
Securities held to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $0 (fair value: $615,944 - 2023; $642,097 - 2022)654,539 691,484 
Other securities37,754 33,944 
Total securities1,734,658 1,982,529 
Loans held for sale2,914 4,443 
Loans, net of ACL of $54,032 in 2023 and $38,917 in 20225,116,010 3,735,240 
Interest receivable33,300 27,723 
Premises and equipment174,309 143,518 
Operating lease right-of-use assets6,387 7,620 
Finance lease right-of-use assets1,466 1,930 
Cash surrender value of life insurance134,249 95,571 
Goodwill272,520 180,254 
Other real estate owned8,320 4,832 
Other assets160,065 132,742 
Total assets$7,999,345 $6,461,717 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:  
Non-interest-bearing$1,849,013 $1,630,203 
Interest-bearing4,613,859 3,864,201 
Total deposits6,462,872 5,494,404 
Interest payable22,702 3,324 
Borrowed funds390,000 130,100 
Subordinated debentures123,386 145,027 
Operating lease liabilities6,550 7,810 
Finance lease liabilities1,739 1,918 
Allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures2,075 1,325 
Other liabilities40,987 31,146 
Total liabilities7,050,311 5,815,054 
Stockholders’ Equity:  
Common stock, par value $1 per share: 80,000,000 shares authorized; 32,338,983 shares issued in 2023, 40,000,000 shares authorized, and 25,275,369 shares issued in 2022, respectively32,339 25,275 
Additional paid-in capital775,232 558,833 
Retained earnings300,150 252,623 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(117,576)(148,957)
Treasury stock, at cost (1,249,607 shares - 2023; 1,249,607 shares - 2022)(41,111)(41,111)
Total stockholders' equity949,034 646,663 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$7,999,345 $6,461,717 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

55

64


THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, AND 2015

  2017  2016  2015 
INTEREST INCOME            
Interest and fees on loans $56,826,566  $38,495,909  $34,242,067 
Interest and dividends on securities:            
Taxable interest and dividends  6,340,610   4,052,162   3,948,459 
Tax-exempt interest  2,349,889   1,869,644   1,854,213 
Interest on federal funds sold  389,881   126,833   63,841 
Interest on deposits in banks  162,467   59,449   93,276 
Total interest income  66,069,413   44,603,997   40,201,856 
             
INTEREST EXPENSE            
Interest on deposits  5,261,318   3,443,812   2,562,241 
Interest on borrowed funds  1,647,933   871,523   645,207 
Total interest expense  6,909,251   4,315,335   3,207,448 
Net interest income  59,160,162   40,288,662   36,994,408 
Provision for loan losses  505,653   625,271   410,069 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  58,654,509   39,663,391   36,584,339 
             
OTHER INCOME            
Service charges on deposit accounts  7,358,531   5,125,846   5,013,983 
Other service charges and fees  623,706   531,162   470,842 
Secondary market mortgage income  4,501,618   4,432,705   1,075,118 
Bank owned life insurance income  738,659   528,734   408,535 
Gain (Loss) on sale of premises  (22,123)  (51,838)  133,339 
Securities gains (losses)  (15,889)  126,286   - 
Loss on sale of other real estate  (198,296)  (113,755)  (246,859)
Other  1,376,906   668,194   733,574 
Total other income  14,363,112   11,247,334   7,588,532 
             
OTHER EXPENSE            
Salaries  25,828,269   17,880,844   15,089,136 
Employee benefits  4,719,821   4,255,690   3,447,367 
Occupancy  4,827,711   3,459,206   3,422,116 
Furniture and equipment  1,224,655   1,261,506   1,198,930 
Supplies and printing  640,171   286,880   300,022 
Professional and consulting fees  6,756,847   1,805,420   1,331,928 
Marketing and public relations  405,552   465,344   496,638 
FDIC and OCC assessments  1,252,434   1,019,668   965,642 
ATM expense  1,187,614   882,657   763,248 
Bank communications  1,295,932   782,024   631,261 
Data processing  1,039,210   534,648   150,394 
Other  6,268,117   4,227,812   4,364,440 
Total other expense  55,446,333   36,861,699   32,161,122 

56
2021

($ in thousands, except per share amount)

202320222021
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans$294,541 $157,768 $151,203 
Interest and dividends on securities:  
Taxable interest and dividends32,202 29,656 16,685 
Tax-exempt interest11,737 11,017 7,721 
Interest on deposits in banks2,453 1,952 1,136 
Total interest income340,933 200,393 176,745 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits71,359 13,978 12,062 
Interest on borrowed funds20,249 8,599 7,619 
Total interest expense91,608 22,577 19,681 
Net interest income249,325 177,816 157,064 
Provision for credit losses, LHFI13,750 5,350 (1,456)
Provision for credit losses, OBSC exposures750 255 352 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses234,825 172,211 158,168 
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts14,175 8,668 7,264 
Other service charges and fees3,177 1,833 1,508 
Interchange fees18,914 12,702 11,562 
Secondary market mortgage income2,866 4,303 8,823 
Bank owned life insurance income3,319 2,101 1,955 
BOLI death proceeds— 1,630 — 
Gain (loss) on sale of premises35 (116)(264)
Securities (loss) gain(9,716)(82)143 
Gain (loss) on sale of other real estate214 (300)
Government awards/grants6,197 873 1,826 
Bargain purchase gain— 281 1,300 
Other7,732 4,554 3,656 
Total non-interest income46,705 36,961 37,473 
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries76,609 57,903 53,371 
Employee benefits16,803 15,174 12,485 
Occupancy17,381 12,854 12,713 
Furniture and equipment3,987 2,981 2,848 
Supplies and printing1,240 967 903 
Professional and consulting fees6,446 3,558 4,035 
Marketing and public relations833 393 615 
FDIC and OCC assessments3,849 2,122 2,074 
ATM expense5,821 3,873 3,623 
Bank communications3,579 1,904 1,754 
Data processing2,771 2,211 1,578 
Acquisition expense/charter conversion9,075 6,410 1,607 
Other36,332 20,133 16,953 
Total non-interest expense184,726 130,483 114,559 
65

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, AND 2015

Continued: 2017  2016  2015 
          
Income before income taxes $17,571,288  $14,049,026  $12,011,749 
Income taxes  6,954,812   3,930,339   3,213,047 
             
Net income  10,616,476   10,118,687   8,798,702 
Preferred dividends and stock accretion  -   452,305   342,460 
Net income applicable to common stockholders $10.616,476  $9,666,382  $8,456,242 
             
Net income per share:            
Basic $1.12  $1.86  $1.64 
Diluted  1.11   1.64   1.62 
Net income applicable to common stockholders:            
Basic $1.12  $1.78  $1.57 
Diluted  1.11   1.57   1.55 

2021

($ in thousands, except per share amount)
Continued:
202320222021
Income before income taxes$96,804 $78,689 $81,082 
Income taxes21,347 15,770 16,915 
Net income available to common stockholders$75,457 $62,919 $64,167 
Earnings per share:
Basic$2.41 $2.86 $3.05 
Diluted2.39 2.84 3.03 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

57

66



THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(LOSS)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, AND 2015

  2017  2016  2015 
          
Net income $10,616,476  $10,118,687  $8,798,702 
             
Other comprehensive income:            
Unrealized gains on securities:            
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on available-for-sale securities  1,080,344   (3,315,089)  (1,093,182)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included net income  15,889   (126,286)  - 
             
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on available-for-sale securities  1,096,233   (3,441,375)  (1,093,182)
             
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on loans held for Sale  79,759   (99,283)  2,753 
             
Income tax benefit (expense)  (459,522)  1,363,987   370,655 
             
Other comprehensive income (loss)  716,470   (2,176,671)  (719,774)
             
Comprehensive income $11,332,946  $7,942,016  $8,078,928 

2021

($ in thousands)202320222021
Net income$75,457 $62,919 $64,167 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gain/(loss) arising during the period on available-for-sale securities31,921 (173,428)(23,738)
Net unrealized loss at time of transfer on securities available-for-sale transferred to held-to-maturity— (36,838)— 
Reclassification adjustment for (accretion) amortization of unrealized holdings gain/(loss) included in accumulated other comprehensive income from the transfer of securities available-for-sale to held-to-maturity372 97 — 
Reclassification adjustment for loss/(gains) included in net income9,716 82 (143)
Unrealized holding gain/(loss) arising during the period on available-for-sale securities42,009 (210,087)(23,881)
Income tax (expense) benefit(10,628)53,152 6,043 
Other comprehensive income (loss)31,381 (156,935)(17,838)
Comprehensive income (loss)$106,838 $(94,016)$46,329 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

58

67



THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2022 AND 2015

  

Common

Stock

  

Preferred

Stock

  

Stock

Warrants

  

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

  

Retained

Earnings

  

Accum-

ulated

Other

Compre-

hensive

Income

(Loss)

  

Treasury

Stock

  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2015 $5,342,670  $17,123,000  $283,738  $44,136,411  $27,975,049  $1,818,361  $(463,645) $96,215,584 
                                 
Net income 2015  -   -   -   -   8,798,702   -   -   8,798,702 
Other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   -   -   (719,774)  -   (719,774)
Dividends on preferred stock  -   -   -   -   (342,460)  -   -   (342,460)
Cash dividend declared, $.15 per common share  -   -   -   -   (806,576)  -   -   (806,576)
Grant of restricted stock  69,327   -   -   (69,327)  -   -   -   - 
Compensation cost on restricted stock  -   -   -   721,124   -   -   -   721,124 
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes  (6,324)  -   -   (86,066)  -   -   -   (92,390)
Adjustment to consideration issued in BCB Holding acquisition  (2,514)  -   -   (33,196)  -   -   -   (35,710)
Repurchase warrants  -   -   (283,738)  (18,672)  -   -   -   (302,410)
Balance, December 31, 2015 $5,403,159  $17,123,000  $-  $44,650,274  $35,624,715  $1,098,587  $(463,645) $103,436,090 
                                 
Net income 2016  -   -   -   -   10,118,687   -   -   10,118,687 
                                 
Other comprehensive loss  -   -   -   -   -   (2,176,671)  -   (2,176,671)

59
2023

($ in thousands except per share amount)

Common StockAdditional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
Treasury StockTotal
SharesAmountSharesAmount
Balance, January 1, 202121,598,993$21,599$456,919$154,241$25,816 (483,984)$(13,760)$644,815
Net income, 202164,16764,167
Common stock repurchased(165,623)(5,171)(5,171)
Other comprehensive loss(17,838)(17,838)
Dividend on common stock, $.58 per common share(12,180)(12,180)
Issuance restricted stock grant93,57894(94)
Restricted stock grant forfeited(2,021)(2)2
Compensation expense3,1003,100
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes(21,906)(22)(699)(721)
Balance, December 31, 202121,668,644$21,669$459,228$206,228$7,978(649,607)$(18,931)$676,172
Net income, 2022— — — 62,919 — — — 62,919 
Common stock repurchased— — — — — (600,000)(22,180)(22,180)
Other comprehensive loss— — — — (156,935)— — (156,935)
Dividend on common stock, $.74 per common share— — — (16,524)— — — (16,524)
Issuance of common shares for BBI acquisition3,498,936 3,499 97,970 — — — — 101,469 
Issuance restricted stock grant129,950 130 (130)— — — — — 
Restricted stock grant forfeited(2,500)(3)— — — — — 
Compensation expense— — 2,425 — — — — 2,425 
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes(19,661)(20)(663)— — — — (683)
Balance, December 31, 202225,275,369 $25,275 $558,833 $252,623 $(148,957)(1,249,607)$(41,111)$646,663 
Net income, 202375,45775,457
Other comprehensive income31,381 31,381 
Dividend on common stock, $.90 per common share(27,930)(27,930)
Issuance of common shares for HSBI acquisition6,920,4226,920214,602 221,522
Issuance restricted stock grant167,173167(167)
Restricted stock grant forfeited(12,194)(12)12
Compensation expense2,3022,302
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes(11,787)(11)(350)(361)
Balance, December 31, 202332,338,983$32,339$775,232$300,150$(117,576)(1,249,607)$(41,111)$949,034
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
68


THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022 AND 2015

Continued:                        
 

Common

Stock

  

Preferred

Stock

  

Stock

Warrants

  

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

  

Retained

Earnings

  

Accum-

ulated

Other

Compre-

hensive

Income

(Loss)

  

Treasury

Stock

  Total 
Dividends on preferred stock  -   -   -   -   (452,305)  -   -   (452,305)
Cash dividend declared, $.15 per common share  -   -   -   -   (814,711)  -   -   (814,711)
Grant of restricted stock  61,247   -   -   (61,247)  -   -   -   - 
Compensation cost on restricted stock  -   -   -   772,311   -   -   -   772,311 
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes  (9,895)  -   -   (166,217)  -   -   -   (176,112)
Repayment of CDCI preferred shares  -   (17,123,000)  -   1,198,000   -   -   -   (15,925,000)
Issuance of Preferred Stock, Series E  -   63,249,996   -   -   -   -   -   63,249,996 
Conversion of Preferred, Series E to common  3,563,380   (63,249,996)  -   59,686,616   -   -   -   - 
Costs associated with capital raise  -   -   -   (3,505,578)  -   -   -   (3,505,578)
Balance, December 31, 2016 $9,017,891  $-  $-  $102,574,159  $44,476,386  $(1,078,084) $(463,645) $154,526,707 
                                 
Net income, 2017  -   -   -   -   10,616,476   -   -   10,616,476 
                                 
Other comprehensive Income  -   -   -   -   -   716,470   -   716,470 

60
2021

($ in thousands)202320222021
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$75,457 $62,919 $64,167 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization12,099 12,173 13,792 
FHLB stock dividends(355)(28)(27)
Provision for credit losses14,500 5,605 (1,104)
Deferred income taxes7,006 940 1,739 
Restricted stock expense2,302 2,425 3,100 
Increase in cash value of life insurance(3,319)(2,101)(1,955)
Amortization and accretion, net, related to acquisitions(4,432)1,706 (30)
Bank premises and equipment loss/(gain)(35)116 264 
Acquisition gain— (281)(1,300)
Securities loss (gain)9,716 82 (143)
Loss on sale/writedown of other real estate774 159 815 
Residential loans originated and held for sale(91,786)(152,776)(230,456)
Proceeds from sale of residential loans held for sale93,315 156,011 244,210 
Changes in:
Interest receivable(1,228)(2,987)3,218 
Other assets16,086 (45,692)(1,056)
Interest payable19,378 1,613 (463)
Operating lease liability(1,260)(1,306)(1,839)
Other liabilities(39,710)51,449 2,783 
Net cash provided by operating activities108,508 90,027 95,715 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Available-for-sale securities:
Sales285,793 21,069 — 
Maturities, prepayments, and calls132,919 197,417 229,091 
Purchases(8,473)(6,500)(988,536)
Held-to-maturity securities:
Maturities, prepayments, and calls40,469 474 — 
Purchases— (602,718)— 
Purchases of other securities(17,094)(11,444)— 
Proceeds from redemption of other securities14,466 1,237 5,276 
Net (increase)/decrease in loans(227,896)(326,113)202,194 
Net changes to premises and equipment(3,688)(15,522)(7,125)
Bank-owned life insurance - death proceeds221 1,630 — 
Purchase of bank owned life insurance— — (11,733)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned3,069 8,930 4,562 
Proceeds from sale of land1,416 712 — 
Cash received in excess of cash paid for acquisition106,793 23,939 358,916 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities327,995 (706,889)(207,355)

69


THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

Continued:                        
  

Common

Stock

  

Preferred

Stock

  

Stock

Warrants

  

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

  

Retained

Earnings

  

Accum-

ulated

Other

Compre-

hensive

Income

(Loss)

  

Treasury

Stock

  Total 
Reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive income due to statutory tax changes  -   -   -   -   76,128   (76,128)  -   - 
Cash dividend declared, $.15 per common share  -   -   -   -   (1,448,063)  -   -   (1,448,063)
Issuance of common shares  2,012,500   -   -   56,350,000   -   -   -   58,362,500 
Costs associated with capital raise  -   -   -   (3,091,875)  -   -   -   (3,091,875)
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes  (11,867)  -   -   (317,720)  -   -   -   (329,587)
Grant of restricted stock  84,286   -   -   (84,286)  -   -   -   - 
Compensation cost on restricted stock  -   -   -   866,558   -   -   -   866,558 
Issuance of shares for GCCB acquisition  89,591   -   -   2,159,143   -   -   -   2,248,734 
Balance, December 31, 2017 $11,192,401  $-  $-  $158,455,979  $53,720,927  $(437,742) $(463,645) $222,467,920 

2023, 2022 AND 2021

Continued:
202320222021
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase/(decrease) in deposits(427,481)(223,322)601,575 
Proceeds from borrowed funds7,600,0432,055,401
Repayment of borrowed funds(7,340,143)(1,950,301)(114,647)
Dividends paid on common stock(27,550)(16,275)(11,991)
Cash paid to repurchase common stock(22,180)(5,171)
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes(361)(683)(721)
Principal payment on finance lease liabilities(179)(176)(187)
Payment on subordinated debt issuance costs(59)
Called/repayment of subordinated debt(31,000)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(226,671)(157,536)468,799
Net change in cash and cash equivalents209,832(774,398)357,159
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year145,315919,713562,554
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$355,147$145,315$919,713
Supplemental disclosures:   
Cash paid during the year for:   
Interest$51,101$16,932$16,368
Income taxes, net of refunds16,0847,19415,717
Non-cash activities:   
Transfers of loans to other real estate6,6022,5602,143
Transfer of securities available-for-sale to held-to-maturity139,598
Issuance of restricted stock grants16813094
Stock issued in connection with BBI acquisition101,469
Stock issued in connection with HSBI acquisition221,522
Dividends on restricted stock grants380249189
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities8172,698168
Lease liabilities arising from BBI acquisition3,390
Lease liabilities arising from HSBI acquisition184
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

61

70



THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016 AND 2015

  2017  2016  2015 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net income $10,616,476  $10,118,687  $8,798,702 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  2,902,328   2,302,163   2,296,985 
FHLB Stock dividends  (54,400)  (37,700)  (8,600)
Provision for loan losses  505,653   625,271   410,069 
Deferred income taxes  6,445,865   (10,352)  255,638 
Restricted stock expense  866,558   772,311   721,124 
Increase in cash value of life insurance  (738,659)  (528,734)  (408,535)
Amortization and accretion, net, related to acquisitions  1,736,818   629,304   921,853 
Loss/ (Gain) on sale of land/bank premises/ equipment  22,123   51,838   (133,339)
Securities gains (losses)  15,889   (126,286)  - 
Loss on sale/writedown of other real estate  891,617   244,466   386,590 
Changes in:            
Loans held for sale  1,169,594   (2,005,402)  (1,867,661)
Interest receivable  (714,501)  (404,760)  (294,332)
Other assets  1,837,728   (3,553,728)  (2,055,005)
Interest payable  29,826   60,348   (70,112)
Other liabilities  (3,934,866)  (121,118)  (1,406,347)
Net cash provided by operating activities  21,598,049   8,016,308   7,547,030 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchases of available-for-sale securities  (89,196,412)  (53,403,251)  (29,571,287)
Purchases of other securities  (2,890,850)  (1,433,100)  (4,079,400)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available- for-sale securities  57,995,529   45,296,821   42,569,677 
Proceeds from maturities and calls of held-to- maturity securities  -   1,094,138   1,099,898 
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for- sale  7,731,444   250,000   - 
Proceeds from redemption of other securities  682,100   3,012,900   3,187,500 
Increase in loans  (121,437,376)  (98,560,749)  (68,588,377)
Net additions to premises and equipment  (4,675,400)  (2,706,842)  (1,230,531)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance  (468,834)  (5,850,000)  - 
Proceeds from sale of land/bank premises  -   -   949,516 
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned  6,945,936   1,560,773   2,190,625 
Cash received (paid) in excess of cash paid for acquisition  3,910,489   -   (843,895)
Net cash used in investing activities  (141,403,374)  (110,739,310)  (54,316,274)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

62

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016 AND 2015

Continued:         
  2017  2016  2015 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Increase in deposits  75,916,176   122,496,150   24,090,591 
Proceeds from borrowed funds  198,800,000   252,000,000   194,340,000 
Repayment of borrowed funds  (173,633,473)  (293,321,245)  (173,468,821)
Dividends paid on common stock  (1,415,524)  (782,936)  (778,428)
Dividends paid on preferred stock  -   (452,305)  (342,460)
Repurchase of shares issued in BCB acquisition  -   -   (35,710)
Net proceeds from issuance of stock  55,270,625   59,744,418   - 
Repayment of CDCI Preferred shares  -   (15,925,000)  - 
Repurchase of warrants  -   -   (302,410)
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes  (329,587)  (176,112)  (92,390)
Repayment of repurchase agreement  (5,000,000)  -   - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  149,608,217   123,582,970   43,410,372 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  29,802,892   20,859,968   (3,358,872)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  62,118,885   41,258,917   44,617,789 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $91,921,777  $62,118,885  $41,258,917 
             
Supplemental disclosures:            
             
Cash paid during the year for:            
Interest $7,053,879  $4,254,987  $3,448,525 
Income taxes, net of refunds  354,200   4,725,814   4,152,050 
             
Non-cash activities:            
Transfers of loans to other real estate  999,502   4,722,529   1,050,342 
Issuance of restricted stock grants  84,286   61,247   69,327 
Stock issued in connection with Gulf Coast Community Bank  2,248,734   -   - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

63

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A - NATURE OF BUSINESS

The First Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company whose business is primarily conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, The First Bank (the “Bank”), formerly known as The First, A National Banking Association (the “Bank”).Association. The Bank provides a full range of banking services in its primary market area of Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, and Florida.Georgia. The Company is regulated by the Federal Reserve Bank. Its subsidiary bank is currently subject to the regulation of the OfficeFederal Reserve Bank and the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance, and was previously subject to the regulation of the ComptrollerOCC.
On January 15, 2022, the Bank, then named The First, A National Banking Association, converted from a national banking association to a Mississippi state-chartered bank and changed its name to The First Bank. The First Bank is a member of the Currency (OCC).

Federal Reserve System through the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. The charter conversion and name change are expected to have only a minimal impact on the Bank’s clients, and deposits will continue to be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the applicable limits.

The principal products produced, and services rendered by the Company and are as follows:
Commercial Banking - The Company provides a full range of commercial banking services to corporations and other business customers. Loans are provided for a variety of general corporate purposes, including financing for commercial and industrial projects, income producing commercial real estate, owner-occupied real estate and construction and land development. The Company also provides deposit services, including checking, savings and money market accounts and certificate of deposit as well as treasury management services.
Consumer Banking - The Company provides banking services to consumers, including checking, savings, and money market accounts as well as certificate of deposit and individual retirement accounts. In addition, the Company provides consumers with installment and real estate loans and lines of credit.
Mortgage Banking - The Company provides residential mortgage banking services, including construction financing, for conventional and government insured home loans to be sold in the secondary market.
NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company and the Bank follow accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America including, where applicable, general practices within the banking industry.

1.Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

2.Estimates

eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loancredit losses, acquisition accounting, intangible assets, and deferred tax assets.

3.Cash and Due From Banks

Includedassets, and fair value of financial instruments.

Debt Securities
Investments in cash and due from banks are legal reserve requirements which must be maintained on an average basis in the form of cash and balances due from the Federal Reserve. The reserve balance varies depending upon the types and amounts of deposits. At December 31, 2017, the required reserve balance on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank was approximately $29.7 million.

4.Securities

Investments indebt securities are accounted for as follows:

71


Available-for-Sale Securities

Securities

Debt securities classified as available-for-sale ("AFS") are those securities that are intended to be held for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily to maturity. Any decision to sell a security classified as available-for-sale would be based on various factors, including movements in interest rates, liquidity needs, security risk assessments, changes in the mix of assets and liabilities and other similar factors. These securities are carried at their estimated fair value, and the net unrealized gain or loss is reported net of tax, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, in stockholders'stockholders’ equity, until realized. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method. The Company evaluates all securities quarterly to determine if any securities in a loss position require a provision for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the adjusted cost of the specific security sold.

AFS securities are placed on nonaccrual status at the time any principal to interest payments become 90 days delinquent or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. Accrued interest for a security placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. There was no accrued interest related to AFS securities reversed against interest income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.

Allowance for Credit Losses – Available-for-Sale Securities
For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company first assesses whether it intends to sell or is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For securities that do not meet these criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, the Company considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.
Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities AFS.
Securities to be Held-to-Maturity

Securities

Debt securities classified as held-to-maturity ("HTM") are those securities for which there is a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. These securities are carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, computed by the interest method.

Gain and losses on the sales are determined using the adjusted cost of the specific security sold. HTM securities are placed on nonaccrual status at the time any principal to interest payments become 90 days delinquent or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. Accrued interest for a security placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. There was no accrued interest related to HTM securities reversed against interest income for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.

Allowance for Credit Losses – Held-to-Maturity Securities
Management measures expected credit losses on HTM debt securities on a pooled basis. That is, for pools of such securities with common risk characteristics, the historical lifetime probability of default and severity of loss in the event of default is derived or obtained from external sources and adjusted for the expected effects of reasonable and supportable forecasts over the expected lives of the securities.
Expected credit losses on each security in the HTM portfolio that does not share common risk characteristics with any of the identified pools of debt securities are individually measured based on net realizable value, of the difference between the discounted value of the expected future cash flows, based on the original effective interest rate, and the recorded amortized cost basis of the security.
72


Loss forecasts for HTM debt securities utilize Moody's municipal and corporate database, based on a scenario-conditioned probability of default and loss rate platform. The core of the stressed default probabilities and loss rates is based on the methodological relationship between key macroeconomic risk factors and historical defaults over nearly 50 years. Loss forecasts for structured HTM securities utilize VeriBanc's Estimated CAMELS Rating and the Modified Texas Ratio for each piece of underlying collateral and are applied to Intex models for the underlying assets cashflow resulting in collateral cashflow forecasts. These securities are assumed not to share similar risk characteristics due to the heterogeneous nature of the underlying collateral. As a result of this evaluation, management determined that the expected credit losses associated with these securities is not significant for financial reporting purposes and therefore, no allowance for credit losses has been recognized during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities HTM.
Trading Account Securities

Trading account securities are those securities which are held for the purpose of selling them at a profit. There were no trading account securities on hand at December 31, 20172023 and 2016.

64
2022.

Equity Securities

Equity securities are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in net income. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are carried at cost, minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment. There were no equity securities at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Other Securities

Other securities are carried at cost and are restricted in marketability. Other securities consist of investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB),FHLB, Federal Reserve Bank and First National Bankers’ Bankshares, Inc. Management reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis.

Other-than-Temporary Impairment

Management evaluates

Shares of FHLB, Federal Reserve Bank and First National Bankers’ Bankshares, Inc. common stock are equity securities that do not have a readily determinable fair value because their ownership is restricted and lacks marketability. The common stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. The Company’s investment in member bank stock is included in other securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. A decline in the fair valueaccompanying consolidated balance sheets. Management reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of available-for-salethe cost basis. No impairment was noted for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and held-to-maturity2021.
Interest Income
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiums or discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities below cost thatare amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.
A debt security is deemed other-than-temporary is charged to earningsplaced on nonaccrual status at the time any principal or interest payments become 90 days past due. Interest accrued but not received for a declinesecurity placed in value deemed to be credit related and a new cost basisnonaccrual is reversed against interest income.
Loans Held for the security is established. The decline in value attributed to non-credit related factors is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

5.Loans held for sale

Sale (LHFS)

The Bank originates fixed rate single family, residential first mortgage loans on a presold basis. The Bank issues a rate lock commitment to a customer and concurrently “locks in” with a secondary market investor under a best efforts delivery mechanism. Such loans are sold without the mortgage servicing rights being retained by the Bank. The terms of the loan are dictated by the secondary investors and are transferred within several weeks of the Bank initially funding the loan. The Bank recognizes certain origination fees and service release fees upon the sale, which are included in other income on loans in the consolidated statements of income. Between the initial funding of the loans by the Bank and the subsequent purchase by the investor, the Bank carries the loans held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate as determined by the outstanding commitments from investors.

6.Loans

73


Loans Held for Investment (LHFI)
LHFI that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are carried at the principal amount outstanding, net of the allowance for loan losses.credit losses, unearned income, any unamortized deferred fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income on loans is recognized based on the principal balance outstanding and the stated rate of the loan.loan and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. Interest income is accrued in the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with Premiums and discounts on purchased loans not deemed purchase credit deteriorated are deferred and amortized as a level yield adjustment over the impairment accounting guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Section 310-10-35,Receivables, Subsequent Measurement, when, based upon current events and information, it is probable that the scheduled payments of principal and interest will not be collected in accordance with the contractual termsrespective term of the loan.

Under ASC 326-20-30-2, if the Bank determines that a loan agreement.does not share risk characteristics with its other financial assets, the Bank shall evaluate the financial asset for expected credit losses on an individual basis. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral values, and the probability of collecting scheduled payments of principal and interest when due. Generally, impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis using the fair value of the supporting collateral.

Loans are generally placed on a non-accrualnonaccrual status, and the accrual of interest on such loan is discontinued, when principal or interest is past due ninety90 days or when specifically determined to be impaired.impaired unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on non-accrualnonaccrual status, interest accrued but not received is generally reversed against interest income. If collectibilitycollectability is in doubt, cash receipts on non-accrualnonaccrual loans are used to reduce principal rather than recorded in interest income. Past due status is determined based upon contractual terms.

7. Loans are returned to accrual status when the obligation is brought current or has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.
Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL)
The ACL represents the estimated losses for Loan Losses

For financial reporting purposes,assets accounted for on an amortized cost basis. Expected losses are calculated using relevant information, from internal and external sources, about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the provisioncollectability of the reported amount. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for loan losses charged to operations is based upon management'sthe estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term as well as for changes in environment conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, or other relevant factors. Management may selectively apply external market data to subjectively adjust the amount necessary to maintainCompany’s own loss history including index or peer data. Expected losses are estimated over the allowance at an adequate level. Allowancescontractual term of the loans, adjusted for any impaired loansexpected prepayments. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications. Loans are generally determined based on collateral values. A charge is takencharged-off against the allowance for loan losses when management believes the collectibilityuncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed and recoveries are credited to the allowance when received. Expected recoveries amounts may not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off.

The ACL is measured on a collective basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Generally, collectively assessed loans are grouped by call code (segments). Segmenting loans by call code will group loans that contain similar types of collateral, purposes, and are usually structured with similar terms making each loan’s risk profile very similar to the rest in that segment. Each of these segments then flows up into one of the four bands (bands), Commercial, Financial, and Agriculture, Commercial Real Estate, Consumer Real Estate, and Consumer Installment. In accordance with the guidance in ASC 326, the Company redefined its LHFI portfolio segments and related loan principalclasses based on the level at which risk is unlikely.

Management evaluatesmonitored within the adequacyACL methodology. Construction loans for 1-4 family residential properties with a call code 1A1, and other construction, all land development and other land loans with a call code 1A2 were previously separated between the Commercial Real Estate or Consumer Real Estate bands based on loan type code. Under our ASC 326 methodology 1A1 loans are all defined as part of the Consumer Real Estate band and 1A2 loans are all defined as part of the Commercial Real Estate Band.

74


The probability of default (“PD”) calculation analyzes the historical loan portfolio over the given lookback period to identify, by segment, loans that have defaulted. A default is defined as a loan that has moved to past due 90 days and greater, nonaccrual status, or experienced a charge-off during the period. The model observes loans over a 12-month window, detecting any events previously defined. This information is then used by the model to calculate annual iterative count-based PD rates for each segment. This process is then repeated for all dates within the historical data range. These averaged PDs are used for an immediate reversion back to the historical mean. The historical data used to calculate this input was captured by the Company from 2009 through the most recent quarter end.
The Company utilizes reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions when estimating the ACL on loans. The model’s calculation also includes a 24-month forecasted PD based on a regression model that calculated a comparison of the Company’s historical loan data to various national economic metrics during the same periods. The results showed the Company’s past losses having a high rate of correlation to unemployment, both regionally and nationally. Using this information, along with the most recently published Wall Street Journal survey of sixty economists’ forecasts predicting unemployment rates out over the next eight quarters, a corresponding future PD can be calculated for the forward-looking 24-month period. This data can also be used to predict loan losses at different levels of stress, including a baseline, adverse and severely adverse economic condition. After the forecast period, PD rates revert to the historical mean of the entire data set.
The loss given default (“LGD”) calculation is based on actual losses (charge-offs, net recoveries) at a loan level experienced over the entire lookback period aggregated to get a total for each segment of loans. The aggregate loss amount is divided by the exposure at default to determine an LGD rate. Defaults occurring during the lookback period are included in the denominator, whether a loss occurred or not and exposure at default is determined by the loan balance immediately preceding the default event. If there is not a minimum of five past defaults in a loan segment, or less than 15.0% calculated LGD rate, or the total balance at default is less than 1% of the balance in the respective call code as of the model run date, a proxy index is used. This index is proprietary to the Company’s ACL modeling vendor derived from loss data of other client institutions similar in organization structure to the Company. The vendor also provides a “crisis” index derived from loss data between the post-recessionary years of 2008-2013 that the Company uses.
The model then uses these inputs in a non-discounted version of discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology to calculate the quantitative portion of estimated losses. The model creates loan level amortization schedules that detail out the expected monthly payments for a loan including estimated prepayments and payoffs. These expected cash flows are discounted back to present value using the loan’s coupon rate instead of the effective interest rate. On a quarterly basis, the Company uses internal credit portfolio data, such as changes in portfolio volume and composition, underwriting practices, and levels of past due loans, nonaccruals and classified assets along with other external information not used in the quantitative calculation to determine if any subjective qualitative adjustments are required so that all significant risks are incorporated to form a sufficient basis to estimate credit losses.
ASC 326 requires that a loan be evaluated for losses individually and reserved for separately, if the loan does not share similar risk characteristics to any other loan segments. The Company’s process for determining which loans require specific evaluation follows the standard and is two-fold. All non-performing loans, including nonaccrual loans and loans considered to be purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”), are evaluated to determine if they meet the definition of collateral dependent under the new standard. These are loans where no more payments are expected from the borrower, and foreclosure or some other collection action is probable. Secondly, all non-performing loans that are not considered to be collateral dependent but are 90 days or greater past due and/or have a balance of $500 thousand or greater, will be individually reviewed to determine if the loan displays similar risk characteristic to substandard loans in the related segment.
The Company adopted ASU No. 2022-02 effective January 1, 2023. These amendments eliminate the TDR recognition and measurement guidance and enhanced disclosures for loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2022-02, TDRs are loans for which the contractual terms on the loan have been modified and both of the following conditions exist: (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (2) the restructuring constitutes a concession. Concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. The Company assesses all loan modifications to determine whether they constitute a TDR.
75


Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans
The Company purchases individual loans and groups of loans, some of which have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination. These PCD loans are recorded at the amount paid. It is the Company’s policy that a loan meets this definition if it is adversely risk rated as Non-Pass (Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss) including nonaccrual. An allowance for loancredit losses is determined using the same methodology as other loans held for investment. The initial allowance for credit losses determined on a regular basis. These evaluations are based upon a periodic reviewcollective basis is allocated to individual loans. The sum of the collectibility considering historical experience,loan’s purchase price and allowance for credit losses becomes its initial amortized cost basis. The difference between the natureinitial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan portfolio, underlying collateral values, internal and independent loan reviews, and prevailing economic conditions. In addition,is a noncredit discount or premium, which is amortized into interest income over the OCC, as a partlife of the regulatory examination process, reviews the loan portfolio andloan. Subsequent changes to the allowance for credit losses are recorded through provision expense.
The Company continues to maintain segments of loans that were previously accounted for under ASC 310-30 Accounting for Purchased Loans with Deteriorated Credit Quality and will continue to account for these segments as a unit of account unless the loan losses and may require changes inis collateral dependent. PCD loans that are collateral dependent will be assessed individually. Loans are only removed from the existing segments if they are written off, paid off, or sold. Upon adoption of ASC 326, the allowance based upon information available atfor credit losses was determined for each segment and added to the timeband’s carrying amount to establish a new amortized cost basis. The difference between the unpaid principal balance of the examination. The allowance consists of two components: allocatedsegment and unallocated. The components represent an estimation performed pursuant to either ASC Topic 450,Contingencies,the new amortized cost basis is the noncredit premium or ASC Subtopic 310-10,Receivables. The allocated componentdiscount, which will be amortized into interest income over the remaining life of the allowance reflects expected losses resulting from an analysis developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans, including any impaired loans, and historical loan loss history. The analysis is performed quarterly and loss factors are updated regularly.

The unallocated portion ofsegment. Changes to the allowance reflects management’s estimate of probable inherent but undetectedfor credit losses within the portfolio due to uncertainties in economic conditions, changes in collateral values, unfavorable information about a borrower’s financial condition,after adoption are recorded through provision expense.

Premises and other risk factors that have not yet manifested themselves. In addition, the unallocated allowance includes a component that explicitly accounts for the inherent imprecision in the loan loss analysis.

65
Equipment

8.Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The depreciation policy is to provide for depreciation over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Repairs and maintenance expenditures are charged to operating expenses; major expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Upon retirement, sale, or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts, and any gains or losses are included in operations.

9.Other Real Estate Owned

Building and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 10 to 39 years. Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line (or accelerated) method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years.

Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned consists of properties acquired through foreclosure and as held for sale property, isare initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. Physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan occurs when legal title is obtained upon completion of foreclosure or when the borrower conveys all interest in the property to satisfy the loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through similar legal agreement. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of the outstanding loan balancecost or current appraisalfair value less estimated costs to sell. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operation costs after acquisition are expensed. Any write-down to fair value required at the time of foreclosure is charged to the allowance for loancredit losses. Subsequent gains or losses on other real estate are reported in other operating income or expenses. At December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, other real estate owned totaled $7,158,409,$8.3 million and $6,007,621,$4.8 million, respectively.

10.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill totaled $19,959,849 and $13,776,040Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill arises from business combinations and is determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of any net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances exists that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company will perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the years ended December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not the fair value is less than the carrying amount, including goodwill. If, based on the evaluation, it is determined to be more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then goodwill is tested further for impairment. The goodwill impairment loss, if any, is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The Commercial/Retail Bank segment of the Company is the only reporting unit for

76


which the goodwill analysis is prepared. Intangible assets with a finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill totaling $6,183,810 was recordedis the only intangible assets with an indefinite life on our balance sheet.
The change in goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2017, was a result of the acquisitions of Iberville Bank and Gulf Coast Community Bank. See Note C – Business Combinations to these consolidated financial statements for additional information on the acquisitions during 2017.

The Company performed the required annual impairment tests of goodwill and other intangiblesis as of December 1, 2017. The Company’s annual impairment test did not indicate impairment as of the testing date, and subsequent to that date, management is not aware of any events or changes in circumstances since the impairment test that would indicate that goodwill or other intangibles might be impaired.

The Company’s acquisition method recognizedfollows:

($ in thousands)202320222021
Beginning of year$180,254 $156,663 $156,944 
Acquired goodwill and provisional adjustments92,266 23,591 (281)
End of year$272,520 $180,254 $156,663 
Other intangible assets which are subject to amortization, and included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, areconsist of core deposit intangibles,and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a 10 year10-year average life. Such assets are periodically evaluated as to the recoverability of carrying values. The definite-lived intangible assets had the following carrying values at December 31, 20172023 and 2016:

  2017 
(In thousands) 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

  

 

Accumulated

Amortization

  

Net

Carrying

Amount

 
             
Core deposit intangibles $7,640  $(2,930) $4,710 

  2016 
(In thousands) 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

  

Accumulated

Amortization

  

Net

Carrying

Amount

 
            
Core deposit intangibles $4,000  $(2,268) $1,732 

2022:

($ in thousands)
2023Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Core deposit intangibles$99,071 $(30,259)$68,812 
2022
Core deposit intangibles$55,332 $(20,696)$34,636 
The related amortization expense of business combination related intangible assets is as follows:

(In thousands)   
  Amount 
Aggregate amortization expense for the year ended December 31:    
     
2015 $399 
2016  383 
2017  664 

66

($ in thousands)Amount
Aggregate amortization expense for the year ended December 31:
2021$4,137 
20224,664 
20239,563 

Continued:   
  Amount 
Estimated amortization expense for the year ending December 31:    
     
2018 $695 
2019  695 
2020  695 
2021  625 
2022  455 
Thereafter  1,545 
  $4,710 

11.Other Assets and
Amount
Estimated amortization expense for the year ending December 31:
2024$9,533 
20259,518 
20269,518 
20279,185 
20288,193 
Thereafter22,865 
Total amortization expense$68,812 
Cash Surrender Value

Financing costs related to the issuance of junior subordinated debentures are being amortized over the life of the instruments and are included in other assets. Life Insurance

The Company invests in bank owned life insurance (BOLI)(“BOLI”). BOLI involves the purchase of life insurance by the Company on a chosen group of employees. The Company is the owner of the policies and, accordingly, the cash surrender value of the policies is reported as an asset, and increases in cash surrender values are reported as income.

12.Restricted Stock

Deferred Financing Costs
Financing costs related to the issuance of junior subordinated debentures are being amortized over the life of the instruments and are included in other liabilities.
77


Restricted Stock
The Company accounts for stock basedstock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718,Compensation - Stock Compensation. Compensation cost is recognized for all restricted stock granted based on the weighted average fair value stock price at the grant date.

13.Income Taxes

Treasury Stock
Common stock shares repurchased are recorded at cost. Cost of shares retired or reissued is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiary file consolidated income tax returns. The subsidiary provides for income taxes on a separate return basis and remits to the Company amounts determined to be payable.

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of the transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently payable plus deferred taxes related primarily to differences between the bases of assets and liabilities as measured by income tax laws and their bases as reported in the financial statements. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled.

ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes,provides guidance on financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, in tax returns. ASC Topic 740 requires an evaluation of tax positions to determine if the tax positions will more likely than not be sustainable upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. The Company, at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, had no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

14.Advertising Costs

Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, was $336,450, $401,751,$833 thousand, $393 thousand, and $437,085,$391 thousand, respectively.

15.
Statements of Cash Flows

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cashCash Flows

Cash and cash equivalents include cash, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banksother financial institutions with maturities fewer than 90 days, federal funds sold, and collateral identified as "restricted cash" related to the Company's back-to-back SWAP transactions. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for a one to seven day period.

16.Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

purchased and repurchase agreements.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the subsidiary bank enters into off-balance sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit, credit card lines and standby letters of credit. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are exercised.

67
funded.

ACL on Off-Balance Sheet Credit (OBSC) Exposures

17.Earnings Applicable to Common Stockholders

Under ASC 326, the Company is required to estimate expected credit losses for OBSC which are not unconditionally cancellable. The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The ACL on OBSC exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. Expected credit losses related to OBSC exposures are presented as a liability.
78


Earnings Available to Common Stockholders
Per share amounts are presented in accordance with ASC Topic 260,Earnings Per Share. Under ASC Topic 260, two per share amounts are considered and presented, if applicable. Basic per share data is calculated based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted per share data includes any dilution from securities that may be converted into common stock, such as outstanding restricted stock.

There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents excluded in the calculations.

The following tables disclose the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted computations applicableavailable to common stockholders:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
  

Net

Income

(Numerator)

  

Shares

(Denominator)

  

Per Share

Amount

 
Basic per common Share $10,616,476   9,484,460  $1.12 
             
Effect of dilutive shares:            
             
Restricted Stock      76,800     
  $10,616,476   9,561,260  $1.11 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
  

Net

Income

(Numerator)

  

Shares

(Denominator)

  

Per Share

Amount

 
Basic per common Share $9,666,382   5,435,088  $1.78 
             
Convertible Preferred Dividend  133,627         
             
Effect of dilutive shares:            
             
Convertible Preferred, Series E      742,371     
Restricted Stock      81,874     
  $9,800,009   6,259,333  $1.57 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
  

Net

Income

(Numerator)

  

Shares

(Denominator)

  

Per Share

Amount

 
Basic per common share $8,456,242   5,371,111  $1.57 
             
Effect of dilutive shares:            
             
Restricted Stock      70,939     
  $8,456,242   5,442,050  $1.55 

stockholders.

($ in thousands, except per share amount)
December 31, 2023Net
Income
(Numerator)
Weighted Average
Shares
(Denominator)
Per Share
Amount
Basic per common share$75,457 31,373,718 $2.41 
Effect of dilutive shares:
Restricted Stock— 192,073 
$75,457 31,565,791 $2.39 
December 31, 2022
Basic per common share$62,919 22,023,595$2.86 
Effect of dilutive shares:
Restricted Stock— 141,930
$62,919 22,165,525$2.84 
December 31, 2021
Basic per common share$64,167 21,017,189 $3.05 
Effect of dilutive shares:  
Restricted Stock— 149,520 
$64,167 21,166,709 $3.03 
The diluted per share amounts were computed by applying the treasury stock method.

68

Mergers and Acquisitions

18.Mergers and Acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date measured at their fair values as of that date. To determine the fair values, the Company relies on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the Company identifies the acquirer and the closing date and applies applicable recognition principles and conditions. Acquisition-related costs are costs the Company incurs to effectaffect a business combination. Those costs include advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees. Some other examples of costs to the Company include systems conversion, integration planning consultants and advertising costs. The Company accounts for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities is recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP. These acquisition-related costs have been and will be included within the Consolidated Statements of Income classified within the non-interest expense caption.

19.Investment in Limited Partnership

79


Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements primarily to facilitate the risk management strategies of certain commercial customers. The interest rate swap agreements entered into by the Company are all entered into under what is referred to as a back-to-back interest rate swap, as such, the net positions are offsetting assets and liabilities, as well as income and expenses. All derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial condition at their respective fair values, as components of other assets and other liabilities. Under a back-to-back interest rate swap program, the Company enters into an interest rate swap with the customer and another offsetting swap with a counterparty. The result is two mirrored interest rate swaps, absent a credit event, which will offset in the financial statements. These swaps are not designated as hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in other assets and other liabilities. The change in fair value is recognized in the income statement as other income and fees.
In addition, the Company will enter into risk participation agreements that are derivative financial instruments and are recorded at fair value. These derivatives are not designated as hedges and therefore, changes in fair value are recorded directly through earnings at each reporting period. Under a risk participation-out agreement, a derivative asset, the Company participates out a portion of the credit risk associated with the interest rate swap position executed with the commercial borrower, for a fee paid to the participating bank. Under a risk participation-in agreement, a derivative liability, the Company assumes, or participates in, a portion of the credit risk associated with the interest rate swap position with the commercial borrower, for a fee received from the other bank.
Entering into derivative contracts potentially exposes the Company to the risk of counterparties' failure to fulfill their legal obligations, including, but not limited to, potential amounts due or payable under each derivative contract. Notional principal amounts are often used to express the volume of these transactions, but the amounts potentially subject to credit risk are much smaller. The Company assesses the credit risk of its dealer counterparties by regularly monitoring publicly available credit rating information, evaluating other market indicators, and periodically reviewing detailed financials.
The Company records the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts separately within other assets and other liabilities as current accounting rules do not permit the netting of customer and counterparty fair value amounts in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
Investment in Limited Partnership
The Company invested $4.4 million in a limited partner in a partnership that provides low-income housing. The Company is not the general partner and does not have controlling ownership. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in the limited partnership was $3,837,468$1.2 million at December 31, 20172023 and $4,058,801$1.6 million at December 31, 2016,2022, net of amortization, using the proportional method and is reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying value of its investment. The Company received $481,325$481 thousand in low-income housing tax credits during 2017, $160,442 in 20162023, 2022 and $0 in 2015.

20.Reclassifications

2021.

Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 20162022 and 20152021 financial statements to conform with the classifications used in 2017.2023. These reclassifications did not impact the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

21.Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards
Effect of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February, 2018,March 2020, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-02,(“ASU”) No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (ASC 848): “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” This ASU provides temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference London Interbank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. It is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. The Company adopted ASU 2020-04 effective January 1, 2023. Adoption of ASU 2020-04 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
80


In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-08, Business Combination (Topic 805): “Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers.” This ASU requires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination. The amendment improves comparability after the business combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination and revenue contracts with customers not acquired in a business combination. The Company adopted ASU 2021-08 effective January 1, 2023. Adoption of ASU 2021-08 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In March 2022, FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures.” These amendments eliminate the TDR recognition and measurement guidance and instead require that an entity evaluate whether the modification represents a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. The amendments also enhance existing disclosure requirements and introduce new requirements related to certain modifications of receivables made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. For public business entities, these amendments require that an entity disclose current period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investment in leases within the scope of Subtopic 326-20. Gross write-off information must be included in the vintage disclosures required for public business entities in accordance with paragraph 326-20-50-6, which requires that an entity disclose the amortized cost basis of financing receivables by credit quality indicator and class of financing receivable by year of origination. The Company adopted ASU 2022-02 effective January 1, 2023. Adoption of ASU 2022-02 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2023-03, "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205), Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Equity (Topic 505), and Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ReclassificationAmendments to SEC Paragraph Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 120, SEC Staff Announcement at the March 24, 2022 Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Meeting, and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 6.B, Accounting Series Release 280 - General Revision of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other ComprehensiveRegulation S-X: Income. ASU No. 2018-02 allows for the reclassification from other comprehensive income or Loss Applicable to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act). The ASU also allows an accounting policy election to reclassify other stranded tax effects that relate to the Act but not directly related to the change in federal tax rate. Common Stock." This ASU is effective in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company adopted this ASU in the fourth quarter of 2017 by retrospective application. Upon adoption, the Company made a policy election to reclassify stranded tax effects of approximately $76 thousand from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to retained earnings using the specific identification method.

In May 2017,amends the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Codification for SEC paragraphs pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 2017-09,Stock Compensation, Scope120, SEC Staff Announcement at the March 24, 2022 EITF Meeting, and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 6.B, Accounting Series Release 280 - General Revision of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 clarifies when changesRegulation S-X: Income or Loss Applicable to the terms of conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. Companies will apply the modification accounting guidance if any change in the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award occurs. The new guidance should reduce diversity in practiceCommon Stock. These updates were effective immediately and result in fewer changes to the terms of an award being accounted for as modifications, as the guidance will allow companies to make certain non-substantive changes to awards without accounting for them as modifications. It doesdid not change the accounting for modifications. ASU 2017-09 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is permitted. ASU 2017-09 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Company's consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Standards That Have Not Yet Been Adopted
In March 2017, the2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08,Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.2023-01, Leases (Topic 842) - "Common Control Arrangements." This ASU 2017-08 shortensrequires entities to determine whether a related party arrangement between entities under common control is a lease. If the amortization periodarrangement is determined to be a lease, an entity must classify and account for the premiumlease on certain purchased callable debt securitiesthe same basis as an arrangement with a related party. The ASU requires all entities to amortize leasehold improvements associated with common control leases over the useful life to the earliest call date. Currently, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the security. The ASU does not change the accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount as the discount will continue to be accreted to maturity. ASU 2017-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The guidance calls for a modified retrospective transition approach under which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which ASU 2017-08 is adopted. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-08 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

69

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.ASU 2017- 04 removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Under the amended guidance, a goodwill impairment charge will now be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.common control group. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for any impairment tests performed afterthe Company January 1, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2017-04 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,Classification of Certain Cash Receipts2024, and Cash Payments. Current GAAP is unclear or does not include specific guidance on how to classify certain transactions in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how eight particular transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities will be required to apply the guidance retrospectively. If it is impracticable to apply the guidance retrospectively for an issue, the amendments related to that issue would be applied prospectively. As this guidance only affects the classification within the statement of cash flows, ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)March 2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,Financial Instruments2023-02, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Venture (Topic 323): "Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Losses (Topic 326): MeasurementStructures Using the Proportional Amortization Method." These amendments allow reporting entities to elect to account for qualifying tax equity investments using the proportional amortization method, regardless of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments(ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 requires a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) which significantly changesprogram giving rise to the way impairment of financial instrumentsrelated income tax credits. This guidance is recognized by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losseseffective for the Company January 1, 2024, and is not expected to occur overhave a material impact on the remaining lifeCompany's consolidated financial statements.
In October 2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2023-06, "Disclosure Improvements: Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC's Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative." This ASU amends the ASC to incorporate certain disclosure requirements from SEC Release No. 33-10532 - Disclosure Update and Simplification that was issued in 2018. The effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC's removal of that related disclosure from Regulation S-K becomes effective, with early adoption prohibited. This guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial instruments.statements.
In November 2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, "Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures." This ASU amends the ASC to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The main provisionskey amendments: 1. Require that a public entity disclose, on an annual and interim basis, significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss. 2. Require that a public entity disclose, on an annual and interim basis, an amount for other segment items by reportable segment and a description of its composition. The other segment items category is the difference between segment revenue less the
81


significant expenses disclosed and each reported measure of segment profit or loss. 3. Require that a public entity provide all annual disclosures about a reportable segment's profit or loss and assets currently required by FASB ASU 2016-13 include (1) replacingTopic 280, Segment Reporting, in interim periods. 4. Clarify that if the “incurred loss” approach under current GAAPCODM uses more than one measure of a segment's profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources, a public entity may report one or more of those additional measures of segment profit. However, at least one the reported segment profit or loss measures (or the single reported measure, if only one is disclosed) should be the measure that is most consistent with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost, (2) requiring entities to record an allowance for credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities rather thanthe measurement principles used in measuring the corresponding amounts in the public entity's consolidated financial statements. 5. Require that a direct write-downpublic entity disclose the title and position of the carrying amountCODM and an explanation of how the investments, as isCODM uses the reported measure(s) of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. 6. Require that a public entity has a single reportable segment provide all the disclosures required by the other-than- temporary-impairment model under current GAAP,amendments in the ASU and (3) a simplified accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans.all existing segment disclosures in Topic 280. This ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, although early adoption2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. This guidance is permitted. The Company is currently assessingnot expected to have a material impact on the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, theDecember 2023, FASB issued ASU 2016-09,Compensation – Stock CompensationNo. 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 718)740): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspectsIncome Tax Disclosures." This ASU amendments require that a public business entities on an annual basis (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold (if the effect of those reconciling items is equal to or greater than 5 percent of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublicamount computed by multiplying pretax income (or loss) by the applicable statutory income tax rate). The amendments require that all entities includingdisclose on an annual basis the accounting forfollowing information about income taxes forfeitures,paid: 1. The amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal (national), state, and statutoryforeign taxes. 2. The amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid (net of refunds received) is equal to or greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received). The amendments also require that all entities disclose the following information: 1. Income (or loss) from continuing operations before income tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows.expense (or benefit) disaggregated between domestic and foreign. 2. Income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations disaggregated by federal (national), state, and foreign. This ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted the amendments effective January 1, 2017. The Company has a stock-based compensation plan for which the ASU 2016-092024. This guidance results in the associated excess tax benefits or deficiencies being recognized as tax expense or benefit in the income statement instead of the previous accounting treatment, which requires excess tax benefits to be recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital and excess tax deficiencies to be recognized as either an offset to accumulated excess tax benefits, if any, or to the income statement. In addition, such amounts are now classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows instead of the current accounting treatment, which required it to be classified as both an operating and a financing activity. The Company’s stock based compensation plan has not historically generated material amounts of excess tax benefits or deficiencies and, therefore, the Company has not experienced a material change in the Company’s financial position or results of operation as a result of the adoption and implementation of ASU 2016-09.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU NO. 2016-02Leases (Topic 842).ASU 2016-02 establishes a right of use model that requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. For lessors, the guidance modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. A lease will be treated as a sale if it transfers all of the risks and rewards, as well as control of the underlying asset, to the lessee. If risks and rewards are conveyed without the transfer of control, the lease is treated as a financing. If neither risks and rewards nor control is conveyed, an operating lease results. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public business entities. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on its accounting and disclosures.

In September of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 modifies the guidance used to recognize revenue from contracts with customers for transfers of goods and services and transfers of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other guidance. The guidance also requires new qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contract balances and performance obligations. The Company will adopt ASU 2014-09 in the first quarter of 2018 under the modified retrospective method where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial application. Based upon an evaluation under the current guidance, the Company estimates that substantially all of its interest income and non-interest income will not be impacted by the adoption of this ASU because either the revenue from those contracts with customers is covered by other guidance in U.S. GAAP or the revenue recognition outcomes anticipated with the adoption of this ASU will likely be similar to the Company’s current revenue recognition practices. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effectimpact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

70

NOTE C - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Company accounts for its business combinations using the acquisition method. Acquisition accounting requires the total purchase price to be allocated to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including certain intangible assets that must be recognized. Typically, this allocation results in the purchase price exceeding the fair value of net assets acquired, which is recorded as goodwill. Core deposit intangibles are a measure of the value of checking, money market and savings deposits acquired in business combinations accounted for under the acquisition method. Core deposit intangibles and other identified intangibles with finite useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of up to ten10 years.
Financial assets acquired in a business combination after January 1, 2021, are recorded in accordance with ASC 326. Loans that the Company acquires in connection with acquisitions are recorded at fair value with no carryover of the related allowance for credit losses. FairPCD loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination are recorded at the amount paid. The ACL is determined on a collective basis and is allocated to the individual loans. The sum of the loan’s purchase price and ACL becomes its initial amortized cost basis. The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loans involves estimating the amount and timing of principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows atloan is a market rate of interest. The excess or deficit of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretablenoncredit discount or amortizable premium, andwhich is recognizedamortized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan.

Non-PCD loans are acquired that have experienced no or insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. The difference between the fair value and outstanding balance of the non-PCD loans is recognized as an adjustment to interest income over the lives of the loan.

Acquisitions

Iberville

Heritage Southeast Bank

On January 1, 2017,2023, the Company completed its acquisition of 100%HSBI, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 27, 2022, by and between the Company and HSBI (the "HSBI Merger Agreement"). Upon the completion of the common stockmerger of IbervilleHSBI with and into the Company, Heritage Bank, Plaquemine, Louisiana, from A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber and Shingle Co. (“Iberville Parent”), and immediately thereafter merged Iberville Bank (“Iberville”), theHSBI's wholly-owned subsidiary, of Iberville Parent,was merged with and into The First.First Bank. Under the terms of the HSBI Merger Agreement, each share of HSBI common stock was converted into the right to receive 0.965 of share of Company common stock. The Company paid a total consideration of $31.1$221.5 million to the former HSBI shareholders as consideration in cash. Approximately $2.5 millionthe acquisition, which included 6,920,422 shares of the purchase price was heldCompany's common stock, and $16 thousand in escrow as contingencycash in lieu of fractional shares. The HSBI acquisition provided the opportunity for flood-related lossesthe Company to expand its operations in Georgia and the loan portfolio incurred due to flooding in Iberville’s market area in the fall of 2016.  The Company expects to receive $498,207 from the escrow for settlement of flood-related loans. Goodwill at December 31, 2017, reflects the escrow settlement.

Florida panhandle.

82


In connection with the acquisition of HSBI, the Company recorded approximately $5.1$91.9 million of goodwill, of which $3.2 million funded the ACL for estimated losses on the acquired PCD loans, and $2.7$43.7 million of core deposit intangible. Goodwill is not deductible for income taxes. The core deposit intangible is towill be amortized to expense over 10 years.

The Company acquired Iberville’s $149.4 million loan portfolio at an estimated fair value discount of $0.8 million. The discount represents expected credit losses, adjusted for market interest rates and liquidity adjustments.

Expenses associated with the HSBI acquisition were $0$388 thousand and $3.6$4.9 million for the three months and twelve monthmonths period ended December 31, 2017,2023, respectively. These costs included system conversion and integrating operations charges as well asassociated with legal and consulting expenses, which have been expensed as incurred.

The following table summarizes the finalized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed including the goodwill generated from the transaction on January 1, 2017:

(In Thousands)  
     Measurement    
  As Initially  Period    
  Reported  Adjustments  As Adjusted 
          
Identifiable assets:            
Cash and due from banks $28,789  $-  $28,789 
Investments  78,650   (37)  78,613 
Loans  148,516   -   148,516 
Core deposit intangible  3,186   (498)  2,688 
Personal and real property  4,443   498   4,941 
Other assets  9,330   1,140   10,470 
Total assets  272,914   1,103   274,017 

71
2023, along with valuation adjustments that have been made since initially reported.

($ in thousands)As Initially
Reported
Measurement
Period
Adjustments
As Adjusted
Identifiable assets:
Cash and due from banks$106,973 $(180)$106,793 
Investments172,775 — 172,775 
Loans1,155,712 — 1,155,712 
Core deposit intangible43,739 — 43,739 
Personal and real property35,963 — 35,963 
Other real estate owned857 332 1,189 
Bank owned life insurance35,579 — 35,579 
Deferred taxes6,761 (632)6,129 
Interest receivable4,349 — 4,349 
Other assets3,103 — 3,103 
Total assets1,565,811 (480)1,565,331 
Liabilities and equity:
Deposits1,392,432 — 1,392,432 
Trust Preferred9,015 — 9,015 
Other liabilities34,271 — 34,271 
Total liabilities1,435,718 — 1,435,718 
Net assets acquired130,093 (480)129,613 
Consideration paid221,538 — 221,538 
Goodwill$91,445 $480 $91,925 

Continued:    Measurement    
  As Initially  Period    
  Reported  Adjustments  As Adjusted 
Liabilities and equity:            
Deposits  243,656   -   243,656 
Borrowed funds  456   -   456 
Other liabilities  2,928   1,478   4,406 
Total liabilities  247,040   1,478   248,518 
Net assets acquired  25,874   (375)  25,499 
Consideration paid  31,100   (498)  30,602 
Goodwill resulting from Acquisition $5,226  $(123) $5,103 

Valuation

During the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company finalized its analysis and valuation adjustments have been made to securities, personalcash and due from banks, other real property,estate owned, and core deposit intangibledeferred taxes since initially reported.

The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017, are as follows:

Outstanding principal balance $123,325,609 
Carrying amount  122,621,607 

There were no purchased credit impaired loans at December 31, 2017.

Gulf Coast Community Bank

Also on January

Beach Bancorp, Inc.
On August 1, 2017,2022, the Company completed its acquisition of BBI, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 26, 2022 by and between the Company and BBI (the "BBI Merger Agreement"). Upon the completion of the merger of Gulf Coast CommunityBBI with and into the Company, Beach Bank, (“GCCB”), Pensacola, Florida,BBI's wholly-owned subsidiary, was merged with and into The First.First Bank. Under the terms of the BBI Merger Agreement, each share of BBI common stock and each share of BBI preferred stock was converted into the right to receive 0.1711 of a share of Company common stock (the "BBI Exchange Ratio"), and all stock options awarded under the BBI equity plans were converted automatically into an option to purchase shares of Company common stock on the same terms and conditions as applicable to each such BBI option as in effect immediately prior to the effective time, with the number of shares underlying each such option and the applicable exercise price adjusted based on the BBI Exchange Ratio. The BBI merger provides the opportunity for the Company to expand its operations in the Florida panhandle and enter the Tampa market. The Company issuedpaid consideration of approximately $101.5 million to GCCB’sthe former BBI shareholders including 3,498,936 shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock which, for purposesand
83


approximately $1 thousand in cash in lieu of fractional shares, and also assumed options entitling the owners thereof to purchase an additional 310,427 shares of the GCCB acquisition, were valued through averaging the trading price of the Company’sCompany's common stock price over a 30 day trading period ending on the fifth business day prior to the closing of the acquisition. Fractional shares were acquired with cash. The consideration totaled approximately $2.3 million.

stock.

In connection with the acquisition of BBI, the Company recorded approximately $1.1$23.7 million of goodwill and $1.0$9.8 million of core deposit intangible. Goodwill is not deductible for income taxes. The core deposit intangible is towill be amortized to expense over 10 years.

The Company acquired GCCB’s $91.0also incurred $1.3 million loan portfolio at a fair value discount of approximately $2.2 million. The discount represents expectedprovision for credit losses adjusted for market interest rates and liquidity adjustments.

on credit marks from the loans acquired from Beach Bank.

Expenses associated with the BBI acquisition were $0$4.0 thousand and $2.8$1.4 million for the three monthmonths and twelve monthmonths period ended December 31, 2017,2023, respectively. These costs included systems conversion and integrating operations charges as well asassociated with legal and consulting expenses, which have been expensed as incurred.

The following table summarizes the finalized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed including the goodwill generated from the transaction on JanuaryAugust 1, 2017:

(In Thousands)  
     Measurement    
  As Initially  Period    
  Reported  Adjustments  As Adjusted 
          
Identifiable assets:            
Cash and due from banks $6,047  $(314) $5,733 
Investments  13,833   (28)  13,805 
Loans  88,801   -   88,801 
Core deposit intangible  787   166   953 
Personal and real property  4,739   -   4,739 
Other real estate  7,057   336   7,393 
Deferred tax asset  6,693   (15)  6,678 
Other assets  490   (22)  468 
Total assets  128,447   123   128,570 

72

Continued:    Measurement    
  As Initially  Period    
  Reported  Adjustments  As Adjusted 
          
Liabilities and equity:            
Deposits  111,993   -   111,993 
Borrowed funds  14,450   -   14,450 
Other liabilities  950   -   950 
Total liabilities  127,393   -   127,393 
Net assets acquired  1,054   123   1,177 
Consideration paid  2,258   -   2,258 
Goodwill resulting from Acquisition $1,204  $(123) $1,081 

Valuation2022, along with valuation adjustments that have been made since initially reported.

($ in thousands)As Initially ReportedMeasurement Period AdjustmentsAs Adjusted
Purchase price:
Cash and stock$101,470 $— $101,470 
Total purchase price101,470 — 101,470 
Identifiable assets:
Cash$23,939 $— $23,939 
Investments22,907 (264)22,643 
Loans482,903 2,268 485,171 
Other real estate8,797 (580)8,217 
Bank owned life insurance10,092 — 10,092 
Core deposit intangible9,791 — 9,791 
Personal and real property13,825 (1,868)11,957 
Deferred tax asset28,105 (970)27,135 
Other assets9,649 (414)9,235 
Total assets610,008 (1,828)608,180 
Liabilities and equity:
Deposits490,588 490,591 
Borrowings25,000 — 25,000 
Other liabilities14,772 — 14,772 
Total liabilities530,360 530,363 
Net assets acquired79,648 (1,831)77,817 
Goodwill$21,822 $1,831 $23,653 
During the third quarter of 2023, the Company finalized its analysis and valuation adjustments that were made to securities, core deposit intangible, andinvestments, loans, other real estate, since initially reported. Also, certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the classificationspersonal and real property, deferred tax asset, other assets, and deposits.
Cadence Bank Branches
On December 03, 2021, The First completed its acquisition of the Company.

On March 3, 2017, $5.0 million of loans acquiredseven Cadence Bank, N.A. (“Cadence”) branches in the acquisition were sold.Northeast Mississippi (the “Cadence Branches”). In connection with the sale,acquisition of the Cadence Branches, The First assumed $410.2 million in deposits, acquired $40.3 million in loans at fair value, acquired certain assets associated with the Cadence Branches at their book value, and paid a deposit premium of $1.0 million to Cadence. As a result of the acquisition, were sold. the Company will have an opportunity to increase its deposit base and reduce transaction costs. The Company also expects to reduce costs through economies of scale.

84


In connection with the sale,acquisition of the Cadence Branches, the Company recorded a $1.6 million bargain purchase gain and $2.9 million core deposit intangible. The bargain purchase gain was generated as a result of the estimated fair value of net assets acquired exceeding the merger consideration, based on provisional fair values. The bargain purchase gain is considered non-taxable for income taxes purposes. The core deposit intangible will be amortized to expense over 10 years.
Expenses associated with the branch acquisition of the Cadence Branches were $81 thousand and $189 thousand for the three months and twelve months period ended December 31, 2023. These costs included charges associated with due diligence as well as legal and consulting expenses, which have been expensed as incurred. The Company also incurred $370 thousand of provision for credit mark was decreased by $2.2 million,losses on credit marks from the amountloans acquired.
The following table summarizes the provisional fair values of which was included in the credit mark at acquisition.

The outstanding principal balanceassets acquired and liabilities assumed and the carrying amountgoodwill (bargain purchase gain) generated from the transaction:

($ in thousands)As Initially
Reported
Measurement
Period
Adjustments
As Adjusted
Identifiable assets:
Cash and due from banks$359,916 $— $359,916 
Loans40,262 — 40,262 
Core deposit intangible2,890 — 2,890 
Personal and real property9,675 — 9,675 
Other assets135 — 135 
Total assets412,878 — 412,878 
Liabilities and equity:
Deposits410,171 — 410,171 
Other liabilities407 (281)126 
Total liabilities410,578 (281)410,297 
Net assets acquired2,300 281 2,581 
Consideration paid1,000 — 1,000 
Bargain purchase gain$(1,300)$(281)$(1,581)
During the fourth quarter of these loans included in2022, the consolidated balance sheetCompany finalized its analysis and valuation adjustments were made to other liabilities since initially reported.
Supplemental Pro Forma Information
The following table presents certain supplemental pro forma information, for illustrative purposes only, for the years December 31, 2023 and 2022 as if the BBI and HSBI acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2022. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations had the acquisitions been effective as of this date.
($ in thousands)
Pro Forma for the Year Ended
December 31,
20232022
(unaudited)(unaudited)
Net interest income$249,325 $248,639 
Non-interest income46,705 58,645 
Total revenue296,030 307,284 
Income before income taxes105,879 118,465 
Supplemental pro-forma earnings were adjusted to exclude acquisition costs incurred.
85


NOTE D - SECURITIES
The following table summarizes the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, and losses, and estimated fair values of AFS securities and securities HTM at December 31, 2017,2023 and 2022:
($ in thousands)December 31, 2023
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury$16,985 $— $310 $16,675 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities119,868 14,946 104,923 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions486,293 449 48,276 438,466 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential297,735 11 34,430 263,316 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial198,944 76 20,675 178,345 
Corporate obligations41,347 — 3,750 37,597 
Other3,055 — 12 3,043 
Total available-for-sale$1,164,227 $537 $122,399 $1,042,365 
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Treasury$89,688 $— $2,804 $86,884 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities33,659 — 1,803 31,856 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions246,908 9,566 14,697 241,777 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential141,573 — 14,237 127,336 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial132,711 — 12,334 120,377 
Corporate obligations10,000 — 2,286 7,714 
Total held-to-maturity$654,539 $9,566 $48,161 $615,944 
86


($ in thousands)December 31, 2022
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury$135,752 $— $11,898 $123,854 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities163,054 18,688 144,369 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions519,190 598 61,931 457,857 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential341,272 11 42,041 299,242 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial215,200 60 24,363 190,897 
Corporate obligations43,869 — 2,987 40,882 
Total available-for-sale$1,418,337 $672 $161,908 $1,257,101 
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Treasury$109,631 $— $5,175 $104,456 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities33,789 — 2,153 31,636 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions247,467 4,525 13,699 238,293 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential156,119 — 17,479 138,640 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial134,478 13,798 120,687 
Corporate obligations10,000 — 1,615 8,385 
Total held-to-maturity$691,484 $4,532 $53,919 $642,097 
The Company reassessed classification of certain investments and effective October 2022, the Company transferred $863 thousand of obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities, $1.2 million of mortgage -backed securities - commercial, and $137.5 million of tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions from AFS to HTM securities. The securities were transferred at their amortized costs basis, net of any remaining unrealized gain or loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. The related unrealized loss of $36.8 million included in other comprehensive income remained in other comprehensive income, to be amortized out of other comprehensive income with an offsetting entry to interest income as a yield adjustment through earnings over the remaining term of the securities. There was no allowance for credit loss associated with the AFS securities that were transferred to HTM.
ACL on Securities
Securities Available-for-Sale
Quarterly, the Company evaluates if a security has a fair value less than its amortized cost. Once these securities are identified, in order to determine whether a decline in fair value resulted from a credit loss or other factors, the Company performs further analysis as follows:

Outstanding principal balance $60,223,959 
Carrying amount  60,320,605 

Loans acquired inoutlined below:

Review the two acquisitions were accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-20,Receivables-

Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. No loans were identified as purchased credit impaired loans.

Recent Acquisitions

See Note T – Subsequent Events for more information onextent to which the acquisitions of Southwest Banc Shares, Inc. and Sunshine Financial, Inc. that are scheduled to close in 2018.

NOTE D – SECURITIES

A summary offair value is less than the amortized cost and estimateddetermine if the decline is indicative of credit loss or other factors.

The securities that violate the credit loss trigger above would be subjected to additional analysis.
If the Company determines that a credit loss exists, the credit portion of the allowance will be measured using the DCF analysis using the effective interest rate. The amount of credit loss the Company records will be limited to the amount by which the amortized cost exceeds the fair value. The allowance for the calculated credit loss will be monitored going forward for further credit deterioration or improvement.
87


At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the results of the analysis did not identify any securities where the decline was indicative of credit loss factors; therefore, no DCF analysis was performed, and no credit loss was recognized on any of the securities AFS.
Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities AFS. Accrued interest receivable totaled $5.2 million and $6.2 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively and was reported in interest receivable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
All AFS securities were current with no securities past due or on nonaccrual as of December 31, 2023.
Securities Held to Maturity
At December 31, 2023, the potential credit loss exposure totaled $205 thousand and $242 thousand at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively and consisted of tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions and corporate obligations securities. After applying appropriate probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) assumptions, the total amount of current expected credit losses was deemed immaterial. Therefore, no reserve was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities held-to-maturity. Accrued interest receivable totaled $3.4 million and $3.6 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively and was reported in interest receivable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
At December 31, 2023, the Company had no securities held-to-maturity that were past due 30 days or more as to principal or interest payments. The Company had no securities held-to-maturity classified as nonaccrual for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
The Company monitors the credit quality of the debt securities held-to-maturity through the use of credit ratings. The Company monitors the credit ratings on a quarterly basis. The following table summarizes the amortized cost of debt securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2023, aggregated by credit quality indicators.
($ in thousands)December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Aaa$431,527 $467,736 
Aa1/Aa2/Aa3129,751 110,854 
A1/A213,902 13,757 
BBB10,000 10,000 
Not rated69,359 89,137 
Total$654,539 $691,484 
88


The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-saledebt securities and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2017 and 2016 follows:

  December 31, 2017 
  

Amortized

Cost

  

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

Estimated

Fair

Value

 
Available-for-sale securities:                
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies $4,996,142  $-  $4,007  $4,992,135 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions  137,281,213   2,027,575   724,750   138,584,038 
Mortgage-backed securities  197,346,171   785,321   1,553,516   196,577,976 
Corporate obligations  16,599,433   20,901   801,426   15,818,908 
Other  1,255,483   -   335,459   920,024 
  $357,478,442  $2,833,797  $3,419,158  $356,893,081 

73

Continued: 

Amortized

Cost

  

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

Estimated

Fair

Value

 
Held-to-maturity securities:                
                 
Taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions $6,000,000  $1,397,966  $-  $7,397,966 

  December 31, 2016 
  

Amortized

Cost

  

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

Estimated

Fair

Value

 
Available-for-sale securities:                
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies $9,023,293  $27,718  $6,341  $9,044,670 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions  98,327,829   1,677,764   1,183,186   98,822,407 
Mortgage-backed securities  114,990,863   602,179   1,304,090   114,288,952 
Corporate obligations  21,274,200   66,477   1,230,566   20,110,111 
Other  1,255,483   -   315,660   939,823 
  $244,871,668  $2,374,138  $4,039,843  $243,205,963 
Held-to-maturity securities:                
Taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions $6,000,000  $1,393,828  $-  $7,393,828 

The scheduledare shown by contractual maturity. Expected maturities of securities at December 31, 2017, were as follows:

  Available-for-Sale  Held-to-Maturity 
  

Amortized

Cost

  

Estimated

Fair

Value

  

Amortized

Cost

  

Estimated

Fair

Value

 
             
Due less than one year $14,048,332  $14,061,545  $-  $- 
Due after one year through five years  49,518,696   49,775,588   -   - 
Due after five years through ten years  57,713,034   58,588,594   6,000,000   7,397,966 
Due greater than ten years  38,852,209   37,889,378   -   - 
Mortgage-backed securities  197,346,171   196,577,976   -   - 
  $357,478,442  $356,893,081  $6,000,000  $7,397,966 

Actual maturities canmay differ from contractual maturities becauseif borrowers have the obligations may be calledright to call or prepaidprepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

In 2017, there was a net loss of $15,889 realized on

($ in thousands)December 31, 2023
Available-for-SaleAmortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Within one year$45,559 $45,246 
One to five years150,165 143,592 
Five to ten years306,927 270,342 
Beyond ten years164,897 141,524 
Mortgage-backed securities: residential297,735 263,316 
Mortgage-backed securities: commercial198,944 178,345 
Total$1,164,227 $1,042,365 
Held-to-maturity
Within one year$39,082 $38,725 
One to five years72,333 69,387 
Five to ten years54,428 49,697 
Beyond ten years214,412 210,422 
Mortgage-backed securities: residential141,573 127,336 
Mortgage-backed securities: commercial132,711 120,377 
Total$654,539 $615,944 
The proceeds from sales and calls of available-for-sale securities consistingand the associated gains and losses are listed below:
($ in thousands)202320222021
Gross gains$65 $82 $202 
Gross losses9,781 164 59 
Realized net (loss) gain$(9,716)$(82)$143 
The amortized costs of a pre-tax gain of $4,384 and a pre-tax loss of $20,273. There was a net gain of $126,286 realized in 2016 and no gain or loss realized in 2015. No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017.

Securities with a carrying value of $289,001,490 and $170,593,273 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, weresecurities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits repurchase agreements, and for other purposes, as required or permitted by law.

74

The details concerning securities classified as available-for-sale with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2017was $1.095 billion and 2016, were as follows:

  2017 
  Losses < 12 Months  Losses 12 Months or >  Total 
  

 

Fair

Value

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

 

Fair

Value

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

 

Fair

Value

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies $4,992,134  $4,007  $-  $-  $4,992,134  $4,007 
Tax-exempt and tax- able obligations of states and Municipal subdivisions  40,559,417   500,884   8,722,641   223,866   49,282,058   724,750 
Mortgage-backed Securities  89,312,836   806,774   33,286,648   746,742   122,599,484   1,553,516 
Corporate obligations  5,665,770   9,832   3,156,365   791,594   8,822,135   801,426 
Other  -   -   920,024   335,459   920,024   335,459 
  $140,530,157  $1,321,497  $46,085,678  $2,097,661  $186,615,835  $3,419,158 

  2016 
  Losses < 12 Months  Losses 12 Months or >  Total 
  

Fair

Value

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

Fair

Value

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

  

Fair

Value

  

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 
Obligations of U.S. government Agencies $2,989,255  $6,341  $-  $-  $2,989,255  $6,341 
Tax-exempt and tax- able obligations of states and municipal subdivisions  48,199,634   1,183,186   -   -   48,199,634   1,183,186 
Mortgage-backed Securities  78,467,029   1,294,942   1,905,698   9,148   80,372,727   1,304,090 
Corporate obligations  5,075,850   17,932   2,828,766   1,212,634   7,904,616   1,230,566 
Other  -   -   939,823   315,660   939,823   315,660 
  $134,731,768  $2,502,401  $5,674,287  $1,537,442  $140,406,055  $4,039,843 

Approximately 38.0% of the number of securities in the investment portfolio$1.031 billion at December 31, 2017, reflected2023 and 2022, respectively.

89


The following table summarizes securities in an unrealized loss. Management islosses position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded at December 31, 2023 and 2022. The securities are aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:
2023
($ in thousands)Less than 12 Months12 Months or LongerTotal
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury$— $— $16,675 $310 $16,675 $310 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities123 — 104,495 14,946 104,618 14,946 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions20,879 1,479 389,113 46,797 409,992 48,276 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential222 262,012 34,428 262,234 34,430 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial2,896 52 170,256 20,623 173,152 20,675 
Corporate obligations— — 37,597 3,750 37,597 3,750 
Other3,055 12 — — 3,055 12 
 Total available-for-sale$27,175 $1,545 $980,148 $120,854 $1,007,323 $122,399 
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Treasury$— $— $86,884 $2,804 $86,884 $2,804 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities747 31,109 1,798 31,856 1,803 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions10,472 3,949 91,480 10,748 101,952 14,697 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential— — 127,336 14,237 127,336 14,237 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial920 119,457 12,332 120,377 12,334 
Corporate obligations— — 7,714 2,286 7,714 2,286 
Total held-to-maturity$12,139 $3,956 $463,980 $44,205 $476,119 $48,161 
90


2022
Less than 12 Months12 Months or LongerTotal
($ in thousands)Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury$4,563 $419 $119,292 $11,479 $123,855 $11,898 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities34,254 2,293 109,431 16,395 143,685 18,688 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions275,202 31,152 159,508 30,779 434,710 61,931 
Mortgage-backed securities: residential76,125 4,970 222,274 37,071 298,399 42,041 
Mortgage-backed securities: commercial50,193 3,025 136,062 21,338 186,255 24,363 
Corporate obligations35,142 1,995 5,739 992 40,881 2,987 
Total available-for-sale$475,479 $43,854 $752,306 $118,054 $1,227,785 $161,908 
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Treasury$104,457 $5,175 $— $— $104,457 $5,175 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities31,636 2,153 — — 31,636 2,153 
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions127,628 13,583 15,303 116 142,931 13,699 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential138,639 17,479 — — 138,639 17,479 
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial119,758 13,798 — — 119,758 13,798 
Corporate obligations8,385 1,615 — — 8,385 1,615 
Total held-to-maturity$530,503 $53,803 $15,303 $116 $545,806 $53,919 
At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company’s securities portfolio consisted of 1,125 and 1,265 securities, respectively, which were in an unrealized loss position. AFS securities in unrealized loss positions are evaluated for impairment related to credit losses at least quarterly. The unrealized losses shown above are due to increases in market rates over the yields available at the time of purchase of the opinionunderlying securities and not credit quality. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company haswill not be required to sell the ability to hold these securities until such time as the value recoversinvestments before recovery of their amortized cost basis. No allowance for credit losses was needed at December 31, 2023 or the securities mature. Management also believes the deterioration in value is attributable to changes in market interest rates and lack of liquidity in the credit markets. We have determined that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired based upon anticipated cash flows.

2022.

NOTE E - LOANS

Loans typically provide higher yields than

The Company uses four different categories to classify loans in its portfolio based on the underlying collateral securing each loan. The loans grouped together in each category have been determined to share similar risk characteristics with respect to credit quality. Those four categories are commercial, financial and agriculture, commercial real estate, consumer real estate, consumer installment;
Commercial, financial and agriculture - Commercial, financial and agriculture loans include loans to business entities issued for commercial, industrial, or other typesbusiness purposes. This type of earning assets, and thus onecommercial loan shares a similar risk characteristic in that unlike commercial real estate loans, repayment is largely dependent on cash flow generated from the operation of the Company's goalsbusiness.
Commercial real estate - Commercial real estate loans are grouped as such because repayment is for loans to bemainly dependent upon either the largest categorysale of the Company's earning assets. At December 31, 2017real estate, operation of the business occupying the real estate, or refinance of the debt obligation. This includes both owner-occupied and 2016, respectively,non-owner occupied CRE secured loans, accountedbecause they share similar risk characteristics related to these variables.
91


Consumer real estate - Consumer real estate loans consist primarily of loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties and/or residential lots. This includes loans for 74.5%the purpose of constructing improvements on the residential property, as well as home equity lines of credit.
Consumer installment - Installment and 75.3%other loans are all loans issued to individuals that are not for any purpose related to operation of earning assets. The Company controlsa business, and mitigates the inherent credit and liquidity risks through the composition of its loan portfolio.

75
not secured by real estate. Repayment on these loans is mostly dependent on personal income, which may be impacted by general economic conditions.

The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio by category:

(In thousands) December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
  Amount  

Percent

of

Total

  Amount  

Percent

of

Total

 
             
Mortgage loans held for sale $4,790   0.3% $5,880   0.6%
Commercial, financial and agricultural  165,780   13.5   129,423   14.8 
Real Estate:                
Mortgage-commercial  467,484   38.0   314,359   36.0 
Mortgage-residential  385,099   31.3   289,640   33.2 
Construction  183,328   14.9   109,394   12.5 
Lease financing receivable  2,450   0.2   2,204   0.3 
Obligations of states and subdivisions  3,109   0.3   6,698   0.8 
Consumer and other  18,056   1.5   15,336   1.8 
Total loans  1,230,096   100%  872,934   100%
Allowance for loan losses  (8,288)      (7,510)    
Net loans $1,221.808      $865,424     

In the contextas of this discussion, a "real estate mortgage loan"December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, is definedsummarized below:

($ in thousands)December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Loans held for sale
Mortgage loans held for sale$2,914 $4,443 
Total LHFS$2,914 $4,443 
  
Loans held for investment  
Commercial, financial, and agriculture (1)$800,324 $536,192 
Commercial real estate3,059,155 2,135,263 
Consumer real estate1,252,795 1,058,999 
Consumer installment57,768 43,703 
Total loans5,170,042 3,774,157 
Less allowance for credit losses(54,032)(38,917)
Net LHFI$5,116,010 $3,735,240 

(1)Loan balance includes $386 thousand and $710 thousand in PPP loans as any loan, other than a loan for construction purposes, secured by real estate, regardless of the purpose of the loan. The Company follows the common practice of financial institutions in the Company’s market area of obtaining a security interest in real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loanDecember 31, 2023 and tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan portfolio component. Generally, the Company limits its loan-to-value ratio to 80%. Management attempts to maintain a conservative philosophy regarding its underwriting guidelines and believes it will reduce the risk elements of its loan portfolio through strategies that diversify the lending mix.

2022, respectively.

Loans held for sale consist of mortgage loans originated by the Bank and sold into the secondary market. Commitments from investors to purchase the loans are obtained upon origination.

Activity

Accrued interest receivable is not included in the allowance for loan losses foramortized cost basis of the Company’s LHFI. At December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 20152022, accrued interest receivable for LHFI totaled $24.7 million and $18.0 million, respectively, with no related ACL and was reported in interest receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Nonaccrual and Past Due LHFI
Past due LHFI are loans contractually past due 30 days or more as follows:

(In thousands)

  2017  2016  2015 
          
Balance at beginning of period $7,510  $6,747  $6,095 
Loans charged-off:            
Real Estate  (262)  (627)  (534)
Installment and Other  (81)  (73)  (126)
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture  (62)  (71)  (183)
Total  (405)  (771)  (843)
             
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:            
Real Estate  522   755   905 
Installment and Other  105   70   81 
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture  50   84   99 
Total  677   909   1,085 
Net (Charge-offs) Recoveries  272   138   242 
Provision for Loan Losses  506   625   410 
Balance at end of period $8,288  $7,510  $6,747 

76
to principal or interest payments. Generally, the Company will place a delinquent loan in nonaccrual status when the loan becomes 90 days or more past due. At the time a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all interest which has been accrued on the loan but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until the collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain.

92



The following tables represent howpresents the allowance for loan losses is allocated to a particular loan type as well as the percentageaging of the categoryamortized cost basis in past due loans in addition to totalthose loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016.classified as nonaccrual including PCD loans:
December 31, 2023
($ in thousands)Past Due
30 to 89
Days
Past Due 90
Days or More
and
Still Accruing
NonaccrualPCDTotal
Past Due,
Nonaccrual
and PCD
Total
LHFI
Nonaccrual
and PCD
with No
ACL
Commercial, financial, and agriculture (1)$2,043 $313 $353 $965 $3,674 $800,324 $465 
Commercial real estate1,698 630 3,790 647 6,765 3,059,155 410 
Consumer real estate3,992 220 1,806 3,098 9,116 1,252,795 680 
Consumer installment180 — 31 — 211 57,768 — 
Total$7,913 $1,163 $5,980 $4,710 $19,766 $5,170,042 $1,555 

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

  December 31, 2017 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
  Amount  

% of loans
in each category

to total loans

 
       
Commercial Non Real Estate $1,608   14.0%
Commercial Real Estate  4,644   64.8 
Consumer Real Estate  1,499   18.9 
Consumer  173   2.3 
Unallocated  364   - 
Total $8,288   100%

  December 31, 2016 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
  Amount  % of loans
in each category
to total loans
 
       
Commercial Non Real Estate $1,118   15.6%
Commercial Real Estate  4,071   61.6 
Consumer Real Estate  1,589   20.3 
Consumer  155   2.4 
Unallocated  577   0.1 
Total $7,510   100%

The following table represents the Company’s impaired loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016. This table

(1)Total loan balance includes performing troubled debt restructurings.

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
  (In thousands) 
    
Impaired Loans:        
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance $6,559  $2,667 
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance  4,015   3,461 
Total impaired loans $10,574  $6,128 
Allowance for loan losses on impaired loans at period End  661   682 
Total non-accrual loans  5,674   3,264 
         
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing  285   198 
Average investment in impaired loans  9,041   8,509 

The following table is a summary of interest recognized and cash-basis interest earned on impaired$386 thousand in PPP loans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

  2017  2016  2015 
          
Interest income recognized during  impairment  -   -   - 
Cash-basis interest income   recognized  326   188   211 

The gross interest income that would have been recorded in the period that ended if the non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination, if held for part of the twelve months for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, was $342,000, $389,000 and $437,000, respectively. The Company had no loan commitments to borrowers in non-accrual status at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

77

The following tables provide the ending balances in the Company's loans (excluding mortgage loans held for sale) and allowance for loan losses, broken down by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The tables also provide additional detail as to the amount of our2023.

December 31, 2022
($ in thousands)Past Due
30 to 89
Days
Past Due 90
Days or More
and
Still Accruing
NonaccrualPCDTotal
Past Due,
Nonaccrual
and PCD
Total
LHFI
Nonaccrual
and PCD
with No
ACL
Commercial, financial, and agriculture (1)$220 $— $19 $— $239 $536,192 $— 
Commercial real estate1,984 — 7,445 1,129 10,558 2,135,263 4,560 
Consumer real estate3,386 289 2,965 1,032 7,672 1,058,999 791 
Consumer installment173 — — 174 43,703 — 
Total$5,763 $289 $10,430 $2,161 $18,643 $3,774,157 $5,351 

(1)Total loan balance includes $710 thousand in PPP loans and allowance that correspond to individual versus collective impairment evaluation. The impairment evaluation corresponds to the Company's systematic methodology for estimating its Allowance for Loan Losses.

December 31, 2017    Installment  Commercial,    
  Real Estate  and
Other
  Financial and
Agriculture
  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Loans                
Individually evaluated $9,402  $52  $1,120  $10,574 
Collectively evaluated  1,015,934   28,511   170,287   1,214,732 
Total $1,025,336  $28,563  $171,407  $1,225,306 
                 
Allowance for Loan Losses                
Individually evaluated $371  $23  $267  $661 
Collectively evaluated  5,952   334   1,341   7,627 
Total $6,323  $357  $1,608  $8,288 

December 31, 2016    Installment  Commercial,    
  Real Estate  and
Other
  Financial and
 Agriculture
  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Loans                
Individually evaluated $5,935  $40  $153  $6,128 
Collectively evaluated  704,923   21,317   134,686   860,926 
Total $710,858  $21,357  $134,839  $867,054 
                 
Allowance for Loan Losses                
Individually evaluated $651  $21  $10  $682 
Collectively evaluated  5,009   711   1,108   6,828 
Total $5,660  $732  $1,118  $7,510 

The following tables provide additional detail of impaired loans broken out according to class as of December 31, 2017, 20162022.

Acquired Loans
In connection with the acquisitions of BBI and 2015. The recorded investment included inHSBI, the following table represents customer balances net of any partial charge-offs recognized on the loans, net of any deferred fees and costs. Recorded investment excludes any insignificant amount of accrued interest receivable on loans 90-days or more past due and still accruing. The unpaid balance represents the recorded balance prior to any partial charge-offs.

78

December 31, 2017          Average  Interest 
           Recorded  Income 
  Recorded  Unpaid  Related  Investment  Recognized 
  Investment  Balance  Allowance  YTD  YTD 
  (In thousands) 
Impaired loans with no related allowance:                    
Commercial installment $270  $270  $-  $90  $1 
Commercial real estate  4,080   4,176   -   3,502   101 
Consumer real estate  2,180   2,424   -   1,897   83 
Consumer installment  29   29   -   17   - 
Total $6,559  $6,899  $-  $5,506  $185 
                     
Impaired loans with a related allowance:                    
Commercial installment $850  $850  $267  $262  $14 
Commercial real estate  2,638   2,638   234   2,756   112 
Consumer real estate  504   504   137   493   15 
Consumer installment  23   23   23   24   - 
Total $4,015  $4,015  $661  $3,535  $141 
                     
Total Impaired Loans:                    
Commercial installment $1,120  $1,120  $267  $352  $15 
Commercial real estate  6,718   6,814   234   6,258   213 
Consumer real estate  2,684   2,928   137   2,390   98 
Consumer installment  52   52   23   41   - 
Total Impaired Loans $10,574  $10,914  $661  $9,041  $326 

December 31, 2016          Average  Interest 
           Recorded  Income 
  Recorded  Unpaid  Related  Investment  Recognized 
  Investment  Balance  Allowance  YTD  YTD 
  (In thousands) 
Impaired loans with no related allowance:                    
Commercial installment $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Commercial real estate  2,324   2,570   -   4,368   37 
Consumer real estate  329   329   -   291   1 
Consumer installment  14   14   -   9   - 
Total $2,667  $2,913  $-  $4,668  $38 

79

Continued:

           Average  Interest 
           Recorded  Income 
  Recorded  Unpaid  Related  Investment  Recognized 
  Investment  Balance  Allowance  YTD  YTD 
                
Impaired loans with a related allowance:                    
Commercial installment $153  $153  $10  $244  $9 
Commercial real estate  2,726   2,726   343   2,832   127 
Consumer real estate  556   669   308   733   14 
Consumer installment  26   27   21   32   - 
Total $3,461  $3,575  $682  $3,841  $150 
                     
Total Impaired Loans:                    
Commercial installment $153  $153  $10  $244  $9 
Commercial real estate  5,050   5,296   343   7,200   164 
Consumer real estate  885   998   308   1,024   15 
Consumer installment  40   41   21   41   - 
Total Impaired Loans $6,128  $6,488  $682  $8,509  $188 

December 31, 2015          Average  Interest 
           Recorded  Income 
  Recorded  Unpaid  Related  Investment  Recognized 
  Investment  Balance  Allowance  YTD  YTD 
  (In thousands) 
Impaired loans with no related allowance:                    
Commercial installment $-  $-  $-  $2  $- 
Commercial real estate  5,790   5,828   -   5,099   50 
Consumer real estate  223   223   -   205   - 
Consumer installment  7   7   -   8   - 
Total $6,020  $6,058  $-  $5,314  $50 
                     
Impaired loans with a related allowance:                    
Commercial installment $306  $306  $50  $264  $14 
Commercial real estate  2,927   2,927   444   2,891   132 
Consumer real estate  842   842   438   1,152   15 
Consumer installment  32   32   25   31   - 
Total $4,107  $4,107  $957  $4,338  $161 
                     
Total Impaired Loans:                    
Commercial installment $306  $306  $50  $266  $14 
Commercial real estate  8,717   8,755   444   7,990   182 
Consumer real estate  1,065   1,065   438   1,357   15 
Consumer installment  39   39   25   39   - 
Total Impaired Loans $10,127  $10,165  $957  $9,652  $211 

80

WeCompany acquired loans both with deterioratedand without evidence of credit quality in a 2014 acquisition. Thesedeterioration since origination. Acquired loans wereare recorded at estimatedtheir fair value at the time of acquisition date with no carryover offrom the relatedacquired institution's previously recorded allowance for loancredit losses. The acquired loans were segregated as of the acquisition date between those considered to be performing (acquired non-impaired loans) and those with evidence of credit deterioration (acquired impaired loans). Acquired loans are considered impaired if thereaccounted for under ASC 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses.

The fair value for acquired loans recorded at the time of acquisition is evidencebased upon several factors including the timing and payment of expected cash flows, as adjusted for estimated credit deteriorationlosses and ifprepayments, and then discounting these cash flows using comparable market rates. The resulting fair value adjustment is recorded in the form of premium or discount to the unpaid principal balance of each acquired loan. As it relates to acquired PCD loans, the net premium or net discount is probable,adjusted to reflect the Company's allowance for credit losses ("ACL") recorded for PCD loans at the time of acquisition, and the remaining fair value adjustment is accreted or amortized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan. As it relates to acquired loans not classified as PCD ("non-PCD") loans, the credit loss and yield components of the fair value adjustments are aggregated, and the resulting net premium or net discount is accreted or amortized into interest income over the average remaining life of those loans. The Company records an ACL for non-PCD loans at the time of acquisition through provision expense, and therefore, no further adjustments are made to the net premium or net discount for non-PCD loans.
The estimated fair value of the non-PCD loans acquired in the BBI acquisition was $460.0 million, which is net of a $8.8 million discount. The gross contractual amounts receivable of the acquired non-PCD loans at acquisition all contractually required payments willwas approximately $468.8 million, of which $6.4 million is the amount of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected.

93


The estimated fair value of the non-PCD acquired in the HSBI acquisition was $1.091 billion, which is net of a $33.7 million discount. The gross contractual amounts receivable of the acquired non-PCD loans at acquisition was approximately $1.125 billion, of which $16.5 million is the amount of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected.
The following table presents information regardingshows the contractually required payments receivable, cash flows expected to be collected and the estimated fair valuecarrying amount of loans acquired in the BBI and HSBI acquisition as of July 1, 2014,transaction for which there was, at the closing date of the transaction: 

  July 1, 2014 
  (In thousands) 
  Commercial,
financial and
agricultural
  Mortgage-
Commercial
  Mortgage-
Residential
  Commercial
and other
  Total 
Contractually required payments $1,519  $29,648  $7,933  $976  $40,076 
Cash flows expected to be collected  1,570   37,869   9,697   1,032   50,168 
Fair value of loans acquired  1,513   28,875   7,048   957   38,393 

Total outstanding acquired impaired loans were $2,020,769 asacquisition, more than insignificant deterioration of December 31, 2017. The outstanding balance of these loans is the undiscounted sum of all amounts, including amounts deemed principal, interest, fees, penalties, and other under the loans, owed at the reporting date, whether or not currently due and whether or not any such amounts have been charged off.

Changes in the carrying amount and accretable yield for acquired impaired loans were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2017 (In thousands):

  Accretable
Yield
  Carrying Amount
of Loans
 
Balance at beginning of period $894  $1,305 
Accretion  (58)  58 
Payments received, net  -   (178)
Balance at end of period $836  $1,185 

The following tables provide additional detail of troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

  December 31, 2017 
  Outstanding
Recorded
  Outstanding
Recorded
     Interest 
  Investment
Pre-Modification
  Investment
Post-Modification
  Number of
Loans
  Income
Recognized
 
  (In thousands except number of loans) 
             
Commercial installment $-  $-   -  $- 
Commercial real estate  526   494   4   17 
Consumer real estate  66   64   1   4 
Consumer installment  -   -   -   - 
Total $592  $558   5  $21 

  December 31, 2016 
  Outstanding
Recorded
  Outstanding
Recorded
     Interest 
  Investment
Pre-Modification
  Investment
Post-Modification
  Number of
Loans
  Income
Recognized
 
  (In thousands except number of loans) 
             
Commercial installment $-  $-   -  $- 
Commercial real estate  296   269   1   13 
Consumer real estate  -   -   -   - 
Consumer installment  -   -   -   - 
Total $296  $269   1  $13 

81
credit quality since origination:

($ in thousands)BBIHSBI
Purchase price of loans at acquisition$27,669 $52,356 
Allowance for credit losses at acquisition1,303 3,176 
Non-credit discount (premium) at acquisition530 2,325 
Par value of acquired loans at acquisition$29,502 $57,857 

  December 31, 2015 
  Outstanding
Recorded
  Outstanding
Recorded
     Interest 
  Investment
Pre-Modification
  Investment
Post-Modification
  Number of
Loans
  Income
Recognized
 
  (In thousands except number of loans) 
             
Commercial installment $-  $-   -  $- 
Commercial real estate  499   492   2   10 
Consumer real estate  45   40   1   - 
Consumer installment  -   -   -   - 
Total $544  $532   3  $10 

The TDRs presented above increased the allowance for loan losses and resulted in charge-offs of $0, $208,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The balance of troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, was $6.9 million, $4.1 million and $6.9 million, respectively, calculated for regulatory reporting purpose.

As of December 31, 2017,2023 and 2022, the amortized cost of the Company’s PCD loans totaled $57.8 million and $24.0 million, respectively, which had an estimated ACL of $3.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
Loan Modifications
The Company adopted ASU No. 2022-02 effective January 1, 2023. These amendments eliminate the TDR recognition and measurement guidance and enhanced disclosures for loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
Occasionally, the Company modifies loans to borrowers in financial distress by providing principal forgiveness, term extension, and other-than-insignificant payment delay or interest rate reduction. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged-off against the allowance for credit losses.
In some cases, the Company provides multiple types of concessions on one loan. Typically, one type of concession, such as term extension, is granted initially. If the borrower continues to experience financial difficulty, another concession, such as principal forgiveness, may be granted. For loans included in the "combination" columns below, multiple types of modifications have been made on the same loan within the current reporting period. The combination is at least two of the following: a term extension, principal forgiveness, an other-than-insignificant payment delay and/or an interest rate reduction.
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of loans at December 31, 2023 that were both experiencing financial difficulty and modified during 2023, by class and by type of modification. The percentage of the amortized cost basis of loans that were modified to borrowers in financial distress as compared to the amortized cost basis of each class of financing receivable is also presented below:
($ in thousands)Term ExtensionPercentage of Total Loans Held for Investment
Commercial real estate$581 0.02 %
Total$581 0.02 %
The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts to the borrowers included in the previous table.
Debt Restructurings Prior to the Adoption of ASU 2022-02
If the Company grants a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties that it would not otherwise consider, the loan is classified as TDRs.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 the Company had TDRs totaling $21.8 million and $24.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had no additional amount committed on any loan classified as troubled debt restructuring.

DuringTDR. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 TDRs had a related ACL of $841 thousand and $4.3 million, respectively.

94


The following table presents LHFI by class modified as TDRs that occurred during the twelve month periodsmonths ended December 31, 2017, 20162022 and 2015,2021.
($ in thousands, except for number of loans)
December 31, 2022Number of
Loans
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Interest
Income
Recognized
Consumer real estate1$134 $135 $
Total1$134 $135 $
December 31, 2021
Commercial, financial, and agriculture1$38 $37 $
Commercial real estate55,151 4,890 230 
Consumer real estate4222 187 
Consumer installment113 — 
Total11$5,424 $5,115 $239 
The TDRs presented above increased the terms of 5, 1ACL $22 thousand and 3$1.6 million and resulted in no charge-offs for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
The following table presents loans respectively, wereby class modified as TDRs. TDRs for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification during the year ending December 31, 2022 and 2021.
($ in thousands, except for number of loans)20222021
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted:
Number of
Loans
Recorded
Investment
Number of
Loans
Recorded
Investment
Commercial real estate$— $— 
Consumer real estate1134 255 
Total1$134 2$55 
The modifications described above included one of the following or a combination of the following: maturity date extensions, interest only payments, amortizations were extended beyond what would be available on similar type loans, and payment waiver. No interest rate concessions were given on these loans nor were any of these loans written down.

  December 31, 2017 
  

Current
Loans

  Past Due
30-89
  Past Due 90
days and still
accruing
  Non-Accrual  Total 
Commercial installment $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Commercial real estate  3,701,710   91,734   -   1,024,442   4,817,886 
Consumer real estate  1,012,396   89,476   -   986,803   2,088,675 
Consumer installment  -   -   5,188   18,319   23,507 
Total $4,714,106  $181,210  $5,188  $2,029,564  $6,930,068 
Allowance for loan losses $99,695  $21,610  $5,188  $27,241  $153,734 

  December 31, 2016 
  Current
 Loans
  Past Due
30-89
  Past Due 90
days and still
accruing
  Non-Accrual  Total 
                
Commercial installment $150,509  $-  $-  $-  $150,509 
Commercial real estate  2,463,484   -   -   1,101,279   3,564,763 
Consumer real estate  153,695   89,996   -   122,450   366,141 
Consumer installment  5,898   -   -   23,594   29,492 
Total $2,773,586  $89,996  $-  $1,247,323  $4,110,905 
Allowance for loan losses $124,484  $-  $-  $40,165  $164,649 

82
A loan is considered to be in a payment default once it is 30 days contractually past due under the modified terms. The TDRs presented above increased the ACL $22 thousand and $21 thousand resulted in no charge-offs for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

  December 31, 2015 
  Current
 Loans
  Past Due
30-89
  Past Due 90
days and still
accruing
  Non-Accrual  Total 
                
Commercial installment $206,237  $-  $-  $50,221  $256,458 
Commercial real estate  1,823,217   -   -   2,933,287   4,756,504 
Consumer real estate  721,110   -   -   1,134,816   1,855,926 
Consumer installment  7,894   -   -   29,435   37,329 
Total $2,758,458  $-  $-  $4,147,759  $6,906,217 
Allowance for loan losses $106,028  $-  $-  $197,338  $303,366 

The following tables summarizerepresents the Company’s TDRs at December 31, 2022:

December 31, 2022
($ in thousands)Current
Loans
Past Due
30-89
Past Due 90
days and still
accruing
 NonaccrualTotal
Commercial, financial, and agriculture$49 $— $— $— $49 
Commercial real estate13,561 — — 6,121 19,682 
Consumer real estate1,077 — — 929 2,006 
Consumer installment14 — — — 14 
Total$14,701 $— $— $7,050 $21,751 
Allowance for credit losses$350 $— $— $491 $841 
95


Collateral Dependent Loans
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent individually evaluated loans by class ourof loans classified as past dueof December 31, 2023 and 2022:
December 31, 2023
($ in thousands)Real PropertyEquipmentMiscellaneousTotal
Commercial financial, and agriculture$— $496 $918 $1,414 
Commercial real estate710 — — 710 
Consumer real estate778 — — 778 
Total$1,488 $496 $918 $2,902 
December 31, 2022
($ in thousands)Real PropertyTotal
Commercial real estate$4,560 $4,560 
Consumer real estate998 998 
Total$5,558 $5,558 
A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral. The following provides a qualitative description by class of loan of the collateral that secures the Company’s collateral dependent LHFI:
Commercial, financial and agriculture – Loans within these loan classes are secured by equipment, inventory accounts, and other non-real estate collateral.
Commercial real estate – Loans within these loan classes are secured by commercial real property.
Consumer real estate - Loans within these loan classes are secured by consumer real property.
Consumer installment - Loans within these loan classes are secured by consumer goods, equipment, and non-real estate collateral.
There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.
Loan Participations
The Company has loan participations, which qualify as participating interest, with other financial institutions. As of December 31, 2023, these loans totaled $304.0 million, of which $165.9 million had been sold to other financial institutions and $138.1 million was purchased by the Company. As of December 31, 2022, these loans totaled $202.6 million, of which $100.1 million had been sold to other financial institutions and $102.5 million was purchased by the company. The loan participations convey proportionate ownership rights with equal priority to each participating interest holder; involving no recourse (other than ordinary representations and warranties) to, or subordination by, any participating interest holder; all cash flows are divided among the participating interest holders in excessproportion to each holder’s share of 30 days or more in additionownership; and no holder has the right to those loans classified as non-accrual:

  December 31, 2017 
  (In thousands) 
  

Past Due
30 to 89

Days

  

Past Due

90 Days or
More and
Still Accruing

  Non-Accrual  Total
Past Due and
Non-Accrual
  Total
Loans
 
                
Real Estate-construction $192  $27  $92  $311  $183,328 
Real Estate-mortgage  2,656   176   2,692   5,524   385,099 
Real Estate-nonfarm nonresidential  1,487   82   1,724   3,293   467,484 
Commercial  393   -   1,120   1,513   165,780 
Lease financing receivable  -   -   -   -   2,450 
Obligations of states and                    
subdivisions  -   -   -   -   3,109 
Consumer  57   -   46   103   18,056 
Total $4,785  $285  $5,674  $10,744  $1,225,306 

  December 31, 2016 
  (In thousands) 
  Past Due
30 to 89
Days
  Past Due
 90 Days or
 More and
Still Accruing
  Non-Accrual  Total
Past Due and
Non-Accrual
  Total
Loans
 
                
Real Estate-construction $204  $96  $658  $958  $109,394 
Real Estate-mortgage  2,745   102   1,662   4,509   289,640 
Real Estate- nonfarm nonresidential  269   -   909   1,178   314,359 
Commercial  9   -   2   11   129,423 
Lease finance receivable  -   -   -   -   2,204 
Obligations of states and                    
subdivisions  -   -   -   -   6,698 
Consumer  22   -   33   55   15,336 
Total $3,249  $198  $3,264  $6,711  $867,054 

83
pledge the entire financial asset unless all participating interest holders agree.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as:as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually to classify the loans as to credit risk. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings, whichratings:
Pass: Loan classified as pass are consistent with the definitions used in supervisory guidance:

deemed to possess average to superior credit quality, requiring no more than normal attention.

96


Special Mention.Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the Company’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Companyinstitution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting

These above classifications were the criteria above that are analyzed individuallymost current available as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.

As of December 31, 20172023, and 2016,were generally updated within the prior year.

The tables below present the amortized cost basis of loans by credit quality indicator and class of loans based on the most recent analysis performed at year ends December 31, 2023 and 2022. Revolving loans converted to term as of year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were not material to the total loan portfolio.






97


($ in thousands)Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
As of December 31, 202320232022202120202019PriorRevolving
Loans
Total
Commercial, financial and agriculture:
Risk Rating
Pass$102,263 $150,420 $113,487 $47,313 $36,065 $64,020 $281,646 $795,214 
Special mention— — — 141 797 10 951 
Substandard451 330 121 185 550 1,894 628 4,159 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total commercial, financial and agriculture$102,714 $150,750 $113,608 $47,639 $37,412 $65,917 $282,284 $800,324 
Current period gross write offs$14 $51 $225 $139 $206 $110 $— $745 
Commercial real estate:        
Risk Rating
Pass$385,954 $825,505 $558,742 $377,085 $253,746 $569,428 $6,397 $2,976,857 
Special mention— 660 6,118 3,111 9,545 22,648 — 42,082 
Substandard136 7,293 393 566 5,427 26,401 — 40,216 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total commercial real estate$386,090 $833,458 $565,253 $380,762 $268,718 $618,477 $6,397 $3,059,155 
Current period gross write offs$— $— $193 $— $— $57 $— $250 
Consumer real estate:        
Risk Rating
Pass$176,144 $334,056 $219,071 $127,539 $59,615 $163,464 $153,821 $1,233,710 
Special mention— 1,081 — — 643 3,246 412 5,382 
Substandard502 404 511 1,559 514 6,988 3,225 13,703 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total consumer real estate$176,646 $335,541 $219,582 $129,098 $60,772 $173,698 $157,458 $1,252,795 
Current period gross write offs$$19 $— $— $— $25 $— $49 
Consumer installment:
Risk Rating
Pass$24,482 $12,408 $7,316 $2,919 $1,213 $1,195 $8,156 $57,689 
Special mention— — — — — — — — 
Substandard— 17 42 11 — 79 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total consumer installment$24,482 $12,416 $7,333 $2,961 $1,224 $1,195 $8,157 $57,768 
Current period gross write offs$226 $567 $223 $179 $156 $576 $121 $2,048 
Total
Pass$688,843 $1,322,389 $898,616 $554,856 $350,639 $798,107 $450,020 $5,063,470 
Special mention— 1,741 6,118 3,252 10,985 25,897 422 48,415 
Substandard1,089 8,035 1,042 2,352 6,502 35,283 3,854 58,157 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total$689,932 $1,332,165 $905,776 $560,460 $368,126 $859,287 $454,296 $5,170,042 
Current period gross write offs$245 $637 $641 $318 $362 $768 $121 $3,092 
98


($ in thousands)Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
As of December 31, 202220222021202020192018PriorRevolving
Loans
Total
Commercial, financial and agriculture:
Risk Rating
Pass$181,761 $141,174 $55,690 $53,954 $43,441 $52,038 $181 $528,239 
Special mention380 5,188 1,664 — — 412 — 7,644 
Substandard50 — — 34 33 192 — 309 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total commercial, financial and agriculture$182,191 $146,362 $57,354 $53,988 $43,474 $52,642 $181 $536,192 
Commercial real estate:        
Risk Rating
Pass$582,895 $436,661 $305,140 $217,626 $140,682 $368,185 $1,765 $2,052,954 
Special mention672 1,345 3,938 11,643 9,885 16,612 — 44,095 
Substandard50 2,830 908 1,694 4,797 27,935 — 38,214 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total commercial real estate$583,617 $440,836 $309,986 $230,963 $155,364 $412,732 $1,765 $2,135,263 
Consumer real estate:        
Risk Rating
Pass$325,853 $226,355 $136,052 $59,376 $51,515 $129,923 $112,278 $1,041,352 
Special mention— — — — 823 3,846 — 4,669 
Substandard519 554 1,481 648 1,706 6,894 1,176 12,978 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total consumer real estate$326,372 $226,909 $137,533 $60,024 $54,044 $140,663 $113,454 $1,058,999 
Consumer installment:
Risk Rating
Pass$18,925 $11,618 $5,031 $2,078 $832 $1,445 $3,725 $43,654 
Special mention— — — — — — — — 
Substandard13 24 — — 49 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total consumer installment$18,929 $11,631 $5,055 $2,078 $835 $1,450 $3,725 $43,703 
Total
Pass$1,109,434 $815,808 $501,913 $333,034 $236,470 $551,591 $117,949 $3,666,199 
Special mention1,052 6,533 5,602 11,643 10,708 20,870 — 56,408 
Substandard623 3,397 2,413 2,376 6,539 35,026 1,176 51,550 
Doubtful— — — — — — — — 
Total$1,111,109 $825,738 $509,928 $347,053 $253,717 $607,487 $119,125 $3,774,157 
Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL)
The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. It is comprised of a general allowance for loans that are collectively assessed in pools with similar risk categorycharacteristics and a specific allowance for individually assessed loans. The allowance is continuously monitored by management to maintain a level adequate to absorb expected credit losses in the loan portfolio.
The ACL represents the estimated losses for financial assets accounted for on an amortized cost basis. Expected losses are calculated using relevant information, from internal and external sources, about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term as well as for changes in environment conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, or other relevant factors. Management may selectively apply external market data to subjectively adjust the Company’s own loss history including index or peer data. Expected losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments. The contractual term excludes
99


expected extensions, renewals, and modifications. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed and recoveries are credited to the allowance when received. Expected recovery amounts may not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off.
The ACL is measured on a collective basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Generally, collectively assessed loans are grouped by call code (segments). Segmenting loans by classcall code will group loans that contain similar types of collateral, purposes, and are usually structured with similar terms making each loan’s risk profile very similar to the rest in that segment. Each of these segments then flows up into one of the four bands (bands), Commercial, Financial, and Agriculture, Commercial Real Estate, Consumer Real Estate, and Consumer Installment. In accordance with the guidance in ASC 326, the Company redefined its LHFI portfolio segments and related loan classes based on the level at which risk is monitored within the ACL methodology. Construction loans (excluding mortgagefor 1-4 family residential properties with a call code 1A1, and other construction, all land development and other land loans heldwith a call code 1A2 were previously separated between the Commercial Real Estate or Consumer Real Estate bands based on loan type code. Under our ASC 326 methodology 1A1 loans are all defined as part of the Consumer Real Estate band and 1A2 loans are all defined as part of the Commercial Real Estate Band.
The PD calculation analyzes the historical loan portfolio over the given lookback period to identify, by segment, loans that have defaulted. A default is defined as a loan that has moved to past due 90 days and greater, nonaccrual status, or experienced a charge-off during the period. The model observes loans over a 12-month window, detecting any events previously defined. This information is then used by the model to calculate annual iterative count-based PD rates for sale)each segment. This process is then repeated for all dates within the historical data range. These averaged PDs are used for an immediate reversion back to the historical mean. The historical data used to calculate this input was captured by the Company from 2009 through the most recent quarter end.
The Company utilizes reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions when estimating the ACL on loans. The model’s calculation also includes a 24-month forecasted PD based on a regression model that calculated a comparison of the Company’s historical loan data to various national economic metrics during the same periods. The results showed the Company’s past losses having a high rate of correlation to unemployment, both regionally and nationally. Using this information, along with the most recently published Wall Street Journal survey of sixty economists’ forecasts predicting unemployment rates out over the next eight quarters, a corresponding future PD can be calculated for the forward-looking 24-month period. This data can also be used to predict loan losses at different levels of stress, including a baseline, adverse and severely adverse economic condition. After the forecast period, PD rates revert to the historical mean of the entire data set.
The LGD calculation is based on actual losses (charge-offs, net recoveries) at a loan level experienced over the entire lookback period aggregated to get a total for each segment of loans. The aggregate loss amount is divided by the exposure at default to determine an LGD rate. Defaults occurring during the lookback period are included in the denominator, whether a loss occurred or not and exposure at default is determined by the loan balance immediately preceding the default event. If there is not a minimum of five past defaults in a loan segment, or less than 15.0% calculated LGD rate, or the total balance at default is less than 1.0% of the balance in the respective call code as follows:

           Commercial,    

(In thousands)

December 31, 2017

 
 Real Estate
Commercial
  Real Estate
Mortgage
  Installment and
Other
  Financial and
Agriculture
  Total 
       
Pass $763,572  $226,178  $28,482  $166,819  $1,185,051 
Special Mention  15,987   680   -   2,908   19,575 
Substandard  14,979   4,622   80   1,905   21,586 
Doubtful  94   -   -   23   117 
Subtotal  794,632   231,480   28,562   171,655   1,226,329 
Less:                    
Unearned Discount  710   65   -   248   1,023 
Loans, net of unearned discount $793,922  $231,415  $28,562  $171,407  $1,225,306 

           Commercial,    
December 31, 2016  

Real Estate

Commercial

  Real Estate
Mortgage
  Installment and
Other
  Financial and
 Agriculture
  Total 
       
Pass $522,949  $174,325  $21,278  $134,235  $852,787 
Special Mention  376   237   -   618   1,231 
Substandard  11,873   1,336   79   208   13,496 
Doubtful  -   200   -   40   240 
Subtotal  535,198   176,098   21,357   135,101   867,754 
Less:                    
Unearned Discount  378   60   -   262   700 
Loans, net of unearned discount $534,820  $176,038  $21,357  $134,839  $867,054 

of the model run date, a proxy index is used. This index is proprietary to the Company’s ACL modeling vendor derived from loss data of other client institutions similar in organization structure to the Company. The vendor also provides a “crisis” index derived from loss data between the post-recessionary years of 2008-2013 that the Company uses.
The model then uses these inputs in a non-discounted version of DCF methodology to calculate the quantitative portion of estimated losses. The model creates loan level amortization schedules that detail out the expected monthly payments for a loan including estimated prepayments and payoffs. These expected cash flows are discounted back to present value using the loan’s coupon rate instead of the effective interest rate. On a quarterly basis, the Company uses internal credit portfolio data, such as changes in portfolio volume and composition, underwriting practices, and levels of past due loans, nonaccruals and classified assets along with other external information not used in the quantitative calculation to determine if any subjective qualitative adjustments are required so that all significant risks are incorporated to form a sufficient basis to estimate credit losses.
100


The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
December 31, 2023
($ in thousands)Commercial,
Financial and
Agriculture
Commercial
Real Estate
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Installment
Total
Allowance for credit losses:    
Beginning balance$6,349 $20,389 $11,599 $580 $38,917 
Initial allowance on PCD loans727 2,260 182 3,176 
Provision for credit losses2,164 6,610 3,279 1,697 13,750 
Loans charged-off(745)(250)(49)(2,048)(3,092)
Recoveries349 116 249 567 1,281 
Total ending allowance balance$8,844 $29,125 $15,260 $803 $54,032 
December 31, 2022
($ in thousands)Commercial,
Financial and
Agriculture
Commercial
Real Estate
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Installment
Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance$4,873 $17,552 $7,889 $428 $30,742 
Initial allowance on PCD loans614 576 113 — 1,303 
Provision for credit losses688 1,742 2,786 134 5,350 
Loans charged-off(259)(72)(204)(683)(1,218)
Recoveries433 591 1,015 701 2,740 
Total ending allowance balance$6,349 $20,389 $11,599 $580 $38,917 
December 31, 2021
($ in thousands)Commercial,
Financial and
Agriculture
Commercial
Real Estate
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Installment
Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance$6,214 $24,319 $4,736 $551 $35,820 
Impact of ASC 326 adoption on
non-PCD loans(1,319)(4,607)5,257 (49)(718)
Impact of ASC 326 adoption on
PCD loans166 575 372 1,115 
Provision for credit losses (1)1,041 (100)(2,314)(83)(1,456)
Loans charged-off(1,662)(3,523)(473)(555)(6,213)
Recoveries433 888 311 562 2,194 
Total ending allowance balance$4,873 $17,552 $7,889 $428 $30,742 
(1)84The negative provision of $1.5 million for credit losses on the consolidated statements of income is net of a $370 thousand provision for credit marks in the Cadence Bank Branches loans acquired for the year ended December 31, 2022.

The Company recorded a $13.8 million, provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The 2023 provision for credit losses increase is attributable to loan growth and the acquisition of HSBI in January 2023. Total loans were $5.116 billion at December 31, 2023, compared to $3.735 billion at December 31, 2022, representing an increase of $1.381 billion, or 37.0%. During January 2023, loans totaling $1.159 billion, net of purchase accounting adjustments, were acquired as part of the HSBI

101


acquisition. The initial ACL on PCD loans recorded in March 2023, of $3.2 million was related to the HSBI acquisition. In addition, the 2023 provision for credit losses includes $10.7 million associated with day one post-merger accounting provision recorded for non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments acquired in the HSBI acquisition. The 2022 provision includes $3.9 million associated with day one post-merger accounting provision recorded for non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments and a $1.3 million initial allowance recorded on PCD loans acquired as part of the BBI merger.
The Company recorded a $5.4 million, provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $1.5 million, negative provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2021. The 2022 provision for credit losses includes $3.9 million associated with day one post-merger accounting provision recorded for non-PCD loans and unfunded commitments. A $1.3 million initial allowance was recorded on PCD loans acquired in the BBI merger. The negative provision for 2021 was composed of a $1.5 million decrease in the ACL for LHFI, net of $370 thousand provision for credit marks on the Cadence Bank Branches loans acquired. The negative provision for credit losses in 2021 was primarily due to the improved macroeconomic outlook for 2021.
The following table provides the ending balance in the Company’s LHFI and the ACL, broken down by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. The table also provides additional detail as to the amount of our loans and allowance that correspond to individual versus collective impairment evaluation.
($ in thousands)Commercial,
Financial and
Agriculture
Commercial
Real Estate
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Installment
Total
December 31, 2023
LHFI
Individually evaluated$1,414 $710 $778 $— $2,902 
Collectively evaluated798,910 3,058,445 1,252,017 57,768 5,167,140 
Total$800,324 $3,059,155 $1,252,795 $57,768 $5,170,042 
Allowance for Credit Losses     
Individually evaluated$408 $— $— $— $408 
Collectively evaluated8,436 29,125 15,260 803 53,624 
Total$8,844 $29,125 $15,260 $803 $54,032 
($ in thousands)Commercial,
Financial and
Agriculture
Commercial
Real Estate
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Installment
Total
December 31, 2022
LHFI
Individually evaluated$— $4,560 $998 $— $5,558 
Collectively evaluated536,192 2,130,703 1,058,001 43,703 3,768,599 
Total$536,192 $2,135,263 $1,058,999 $43,703 $3,774,157 
Allowance for Credit Losses     
Individually evaluated$— $— $$— $
Collectively evaluated6,349 20,389 11,594 580 38,912 
Total$6,349 $20,389 $11,599 $580 $38,917 

102


NOTE F - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment owned and utilized in the operations of the Company are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization as follows:

  2017  2016 
Premises:        
Land $17,242,999  $10,566,139 
Buildings and improvements  31,931,767   27,463,504 
Equipment  12,546,553   10,436,712 
Construction in progress  1,070,775   779,833 
   62,792,094   49,246,188 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  16,366,063   14,621,836 
  $46,426,031  $34,624,352 

($ in thousands)20232022
Premises:
Land$48,460 $40,846 
Buildings and improvements126,013 100,830 
Equipment41,788 32,486 
Construction in progress1,808 6,447 
218,069 180,609 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization43,760 37,091 
Total$174,309 $143,518 
The amounts charged to operating expense for depreciation were $2,046,005, $1,653,663$7.4 million, $5.7 million, and $1,645,081$5.4 million in 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively.

NOTE G - DEPOSITS

The aggregate amount of time

Time deposits in denominationsthat meet or exceed the FDIC Insurance limit of $250,000 or more as ofat December 31, 2017,2023 and as of December 31, 2016, was $71,596,0932022, were $292.9 million and $60,219,749$146.6 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2017,2023, the scheduled maturities of time deposits included in interest-bearing deposits were as follows (In thousands):

Year Amount 
    
2018 $152,550 
2019  89,431 
2020  15,667 
2021  9,212 
2022  16,416 
Thereafter  - 
  $283,276 

follows:

($ in thousands)
YearAmount
2024$971,259 
202559,867 
202613,593 
20277,575 
202814,935 
Thereafter8,527 
Total$1,075,756 
NOTE H - BORROWED FUNDS

Borrowed

At December 31, 2023 and 2022, borrowed funds consisted of the following:

  2017  2016 
       
Reverse Repurchase Agreement $-  $5,000,000 
FHLB advances  88,072,294   48,000,000 
First Tennessee Bank  16,000,000   16,000,000 
  $104,072,294  $69,000,000 

85

($ in thousands)20232022
Bank Term Funding Program$390,000 $— 
FHLB advances— 130,100 
Total$390,000 $130,100 

Advances

On March 12, 2023, the Federal Reserve Board announced the Bank Term Funding Program ("BTFP"), which offers loans to banks with a term up to one year. The loans are secured by pledging the banks' U.S. treasuries, agency securities, agency securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, and any other qualifying asset. These pledged securities will be valued at par for collateral purposes. The BTFP offers up to one year fixed-rate term borrowings that are prepayable without penalty.
103


In 2023, the Bank participated in the BTFP and had outstanding debt of $390.0 million, pledged securities totaling a fair value for $362.4 million at December 31, 2023. The securities pledged have a par value of $398.1 million. The Bank's BTFP borrowings, which were drawn between March 15, 2023 and December 28, 2023, bear interest rates ranging from 4.69% to 4.83% and are set to mature one year from their issuance date.
In 2022, each advance from the FHLB havewas payable at its maturity dates ranging from January 2018 through June 2019.date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances. Interest iswas payable monthly at rates ranging from .95%4.55% to 4.72%4.58%. Advances due to the FHLB are collateralized by a blanket lien on first mortgage loans in the amount of the outstanding borrowings, FHLB capital stock, and amounts on deposit with the FHLB. At December 31, 2017,In 2022, advances due to the FHLB advances availablewere collateralized by $3.651 billion in loans. Based on this collateral and unused totaled $445,799,187.

Future annual principal repayment requirements onholdings of FHLB stock, the borrowings from the FHLBCompany is eligible to borrow up to a total of $2.051 billion and $1.679 billion at December 31, 2017, were2023 and 2022, respectively.

Payments over the next five years are as follows:

Year  Amount 
    
2018 $77,572,294 
2019  10,500,000 
2020  - 
2021  - 
Total $88,072,294 

As of December 31, 2016, reverse repurchase agreements consisted of one $5,000,000 agreement. The agreement was secured by securities with a fair value of $5,470,105 at December 31, 2016. On September 25, 2017, the underlying securities were repurchased and the agreement was terminated.

The Company entered into a loan agreement with First Tennessee Bank for a $20 million revolving line of credit. The maturity date is December 5, 2018. The interest rate will be at a rate of 2.50% over the LIBOR Rate. The Company executed a negative pledge agreement to which it agreed not to pledge any capital stock of the Bank so long as any indebtedness is outstanding under the line of credit. The loan agreement includes covenants that require the Company to maintain key financial ratios above or below a stated benchmark level and prohibit the Company from incurring loans other than those permitted by the loan agreement without prior written consent of the lender.

($ in thousands)
2024$390,000 
2025— 
2026— 
2027— 
2028— 
NOTE I – LEASE OBLIGATIONS

The Company enters into leases in the normal course of business primarily for financial centers, back-office operations locations and business development offices. The Company’s leases have remaining terms ranging from 1 to 8 years.
The Company includes lease extension and termination options in the lease term if, after considering relevant economic factors, it is committed under several long-termreasonably certain the Company will exercise the option. In addition, the Company has elected to account for any non-lease components in its real estate leases as part of the associated lease component. The Company has also elected not to recognize leases with original lease terms of 12 months or less (short-term leases) on the Company’s balance sheet.
Leases are classified as operating or finance leases at the lease commencement date. Lease expense for operating leases which provideand short-term leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is recorded in net occupancy and equipment expense in the consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for minimumthe lease payments. Certain leases contain options for renewal. Total rental expense under these operating leases amountedterm and lease liabilities represent our obligation to $602,000, $577,000make lease payments arising from the lease. Right-of-use assets and $530,000 aslease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date and based on the estimated present value of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

lease payments over the lease term.

The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at lease commencement to calculate the present value of lease payments when the rate implicit in a lease is also committed under two long-term capitalnot known. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is based on the FHLB amortizing advance rate, adjusted for the lease agreements. One capitalterm and other factors.
104


The following table details balance sheet information, as well as weighted-average lease agreement had an outstanding balance of $708,000terms and $879,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (included in other liabilities). This lease has a remaining term of 4 years at December 31, 2017. Assetsdiscount rates, related to the capital lease are included in premises and the cost consists of $2,675,000 less accumulated depreciation of approximately $1,651,000 and $1,390,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The second capital lease agreement had an outstanding balance of $161,000 at December 31, 2017. This lease has a remaining term of two years at December 31, 2017. Assets related to the capital lease are included in premises and the cost consists of $266,000 less accumulated depreciation of approximately $22,000, and $12,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Minimum future lease payments for the operating and capital leases at December 31, 2017, were as follows:

  Operating
Leases
   Capital
Leases
 
  (In thousands) 
       
2018  536   275 
2019  440   275 
2020  317   191 
2021  197   175 
2022  146   - 
Thereafter  312   - 
         
Total Minimum Lease Payments $1,948  $916 
         
Less: Amount representing interest      (47)
         
Present value of minimum lease payments     $869 

86
2023 and 2022.

($ in thousands)December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$6,387 $7,620 
Finance leases, net of accumulated depreciation1,466 1,930 
Total right-of-use assets$7,853 $9,550 
Lease liabilities:  
Operating lease$6,550 $7,810 
Finance lease1,739 1,918 
Total lease liabilities$8,289 $9,728 
Weighted average remaining lease term
Operating leases7.2 years7.5 years
Finance leases7.9 years8.9 years
Weighted average discount rate
Operating leases2.0%1.8%
Finance leases2.2%2.2%

The table below summarizes our net lease costs.
($ in thousands)December 31,
202320222021
Operating lease cost$1,504 $1,464 $1,657 
Finance lease cost:
Interest on lease liabilities40 44 
Amortization of right-of-use464 464 263 
Net lease cost$2,008 $1,972 $1,927 
The table below summarizes the maturity of remaining lease liabilities at December 31, 2023.
($ in thousands)December 31, 2023
Operating LeasesFinance Leases
2024$1,144 $220 
20251,043 220 
2026945 222 
2027777 252 
2028691 252 
Thereafter2,439 735 
Total lease payments7,039 1,901 
Less: Interest(489)(162)
Present value of lease liabilities$6,550 $1,739 
105


NOTE J - REGULATORY MATTERS

On January 15, 2022, The First, A National Banking Association, a subsidiary of the Company, converted from a national banking association to a Mississippi state-chartered bank and changed its name to The First Bank. The First Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System through the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
The Company and its subsidiary bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and its subsidiary bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgment by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other related factors.

To ensure capital adequacy, quantitative measures have been established by regulators, and these require the Company and its subsidiary bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I1 capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), Tier I1 capital to adjusted total assets (leverage) and common equity Tier 1.
Management believes, as of December 31, 2017,2023, that the Company and its subsidiary bank exceededmet all capital adequacy requirements.

In 2013, the Federal Reserve votedrequirements to adopt final capital rules implementing Basel III requirements for U.S. Banking organizations. Under the final rule, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. The final rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital (Tier 1 Common) to risk-weighted assets and a Tier 1 Common capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that will apply to all supervised financial institutions. The rule also raises the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and includes a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking organizations. These new minimum capital ratios were effective on January 1, 2015, and will be fully phased in on January 1, 2019.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the subsidiary bank was categorized by regulators as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.which they are subject. Under Basel III requirements, a financial institution is considered to be well-capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or more, has a Tier I1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% or more, has a common equity Tier 1 of 6.5%, and has a Tier I1 leverage capital ratio of 5% or more. There are no conditions or anticipated events that, in the opinion of management, would change the categorization.

The actual capital amounts and ratios, excluding unrealized losses, at December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 are presented in the following table. No amount was deducted from capital for interest-rate risk exposure.

(Dollars in thousands) Company  Subsidiary 
  (Consolidated)  The First 
   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio 
December 31, 2017                
Total risk-based $217,157   15.5% $211,338   15.1%
Common equity Tier 1  199,170   14.2%  203,050   14.5%
Tier I risk-based  208,869   14.9%  203,050   14.5%
Tier I leverage  208,869   11.7%  203,050   11.4%
                 
December 31, 2016                
Total risk-based $157,557   15.5% $172,572   17.0%
Common equity Tier 1  140,747   13.8%  165,062   16.2%
Tier I risk-based  150,047   14.7%  165,062   16.2%
Tier I leverage  150,047   11.9%  165,062   13.1%

87

($ in thousands)
December 31, 2023Company
(Consolidated)
Subsidiary
The First
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Total risk-based$892,310 15.0 %$875,071 14.8 %
Common equity Tier 1715,858 12.1 %821,246 13.8 %
Tier 1 risk-based740,113 12.5 %821,246 13.8 %
Tier 1 leverage740,113 9.7 %821,246 10.7 %
December 31, 2022Amount
Ratio
AmountRatio
Total risk-based$753,708 16.7 %$739,616 16.4 %
Common equity Tier 1570,660 12.7 %701,099 15.6 %
Tier 1 risk-based586,068 13.0 %701,099 15.6 %
Tier 1 leverage586,068 9.3 %701,099 11.1 %

106


The minimum amounts of capital and ratios, not including Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, as established by banking regulators at December 31,2017,31, 2023, and 2016,2022, were as follows: (Dollars in thousands)

  Company  Subsidiary 
  (Consolidated)  The First 
   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio 
December 31, 2017                
Total risk-based $111,933   8.0% $111,789   8.0%
Common equity Tier 1  62,962   4.5%  62,882   4.5%
Tier I risk-based  83,949   6.0%  83,842   6.0%
Tier I leverage  71,362   4.0%  71,290   4.0%
                 
December 31, 2016                
Total risk-based $81,504   8.0% $81,391   8.0%
Common equity Tier 1  45,846   4.5%  45,782   4.5%
Tier I risk-based  61,128   6.0%  61,043   6.0%
Tier I leverage  50,412   4.0%  50,364   4.0%

($ in thousands)
December 31, 2023Company
(Consolidated)
Subsidiary
The First
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Total risk-based$475,183 8.0 %$474,679 8.0 %
Common equity Tier 1267,291 4.5 %267,007 4.5 %
Tier 1 risk-based356,387 6.0 %356,009 6.0 %
Tier 1 leverage237,592 4.0 %237,339 4.0 %
December 31, 2022Amount
Ratio
AmountRatio
Total risk-based$360,597 8.0 %$360,071 8.0 %
Common equity Tier 1202,836 4.5 %202,540 4.5 %
Tier 1 risk-based270,447 6.0 %270,053 6.0 %
Tier 1 leverage180,298 4.0 %180,035 4.0 %
The Company’sprincipal sources of funds to the Company to pay dividends if any, are expected to be made fromthe dividends received from the Bank. Consequently, dividends are dependent upon The First’s earnings, capital needs, regulatory policies, as well as statutory and regulatory limitations. Federal Reserve regulations limit dividends, stock repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers if the Company’s regulatory capital is below the level of regulatory minimums plus the applicable capital conservation buffer. Federal and state banking laws and regulations restrict the amount of dividends and loans a bank may make to its subsidiary bank. The OCC limitsparent company. Approval by the Company’s regulators is required if the total of all dividends of a national bankdeclared in any calendar year toexceed the total of its net profits ofincome for that year combined with theits retained net profits forincome of the preceding two preceding years.

In 2023, the Bank had available $147.3 million to pay dividends.

NOTE K - INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense are as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Current:            
Federal $408,086  $3,363,290  $2,484,372 
State  100,861   577,401   473,037 
Deferred (In 2017, includes $2,080,747 due to  6,445,865   (10,352)  255,638 
Tax Cut and Jobs Act) $6,954,812  $3,930,339  $3,213,047 

($ in thousands)Years Ended December 31,
202320222021
Current:
Federal$11,754 $12,071 $12,546 
State2,587 2,759 2,630 
Deferred7,006 940 1,739 
Total income tax expense$21,347 $15,770 $16,915 
107


The Company's income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rates to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  

Amount

  %  

Amount

   %  

Amount

   % 
                   
Income taxes at statutory rate $6,149,951   35% $4,917,159   35% $4,083,995   34%
Tax-exempt income  (1,154,595)  (6)%  (927,506)  (7)%  (831,141)  (7)%
Nondeductible expenses  233,925   1%  130,609   1%  161,176   1%
State income tax, net of federal tax effect  65,560   -   375,311   3%  307,951   3%
Tax credits, net  (331,080)  (2)%  (308,684)  (2)%  (295,800)  (2)%
Deferred tax adjustment due to Tax Cuts and Job Act  2,080,747   12%  -   -   -   - 
Other, net  (89,696)  -   (256,550)  (2)%  (213,134)  (2)%
  $6,954,812   40% $3,930,339   28% $3,213,047   27%

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted which permanently reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction in the U.S corporate income tax rate, the Company reevaluated its ending net deferred tax asset as of December 31,2017 and recognized a tax expense of approximately $2.1 million.

88

($ in thousands)Years Ended December 31,
202320222021
Amount%Amount%Amount%
Income taxes at statutory rate$20,289 21 %$16,525 21 %$17,027 21 %
Tax-exempt income, net(1,696)(2)%(2,369)(3)%(1,692)(2)%
Nondeductible expenses144 — %391 — %29 — %
State income tax, net of federal tax effect3,064 %2,251 %2,299 %
Federal tax credits, net(715)(1)%(715)(1)%(715)(1)%
Other, net261 — %(313)— %(33)— %
$21,347 22 %$15,770 20 %$16,915 21 %

The components of deferred income taxes included in the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Deferred tax assets:        
Allowance for loan losses $2,096,866  $2,897,479 
Net operating loss carryover  1,500,867   2,315,140 
Non-accrual loan interest  344,187   35,208 
Other real estate  842,797   272,598 
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities  150,298   642,629 
Other  965,766   1,184,474 
   5,900,781   7,347,528 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Securities  (43,400)  (115,737)
Premises and equipment  (315,550)  (449,136)
Core deposit intangible  (204,103)  (231,845)
Goodwill  (989,011)  (1,228,960)
   (1,552,064)  (2,025,678)
Net deferred tax asset, included in other assets $4,348,717  $5,321,850 

($ in thousands)December 31,
20232022
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for credit losses$13,276 $9,581 
Net operating loss carryover27,256 24,531 
Nonaccrual loan interest826 600 
Other real estate1,092 894 
Deferred compensation1,161 1,205 
Loan purchase accounting6,438 2,554 
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities38,776 48,738 
Lease liability2,037 2,395 
Other5,014 3,299 
95,876 93,797 
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Securities(560)(627)
Premises and equipment(9,017)(6,588)
Core deposit intangible(16,094)(7,628)
Goodwill(2,651)(2,388)
Right-of-use asset(1,929)(2,517)
Other(1,461)(596)
(31,712)(20,344)
Net deferred tax asset/(liability), included in other assets/(liabilities)$64,164 $73,453 
With the acquisition of Wiggins in 2006, Baldwin Bancshares, Inc. in 2013, BayBCB Holding Company, Inc. in 2014, and Gulf Coast Community Bank in 2017, Sunshine Financial, Inc. in 2018, and FPB Financial Corp. in 2019, SWG in 2020, BBI in 2022, and HSBI in 2023, the Company assumed federal tax net operating loss carryovers. These$228.9 million of net operating losses areremain available to the Company and begin to expire as follows :

Years Amounts 
2018 $551,818 
2019  396,985 
2020-2032  4,464,304 
2033  281,800 
2034  147,617 
2035-2036  92,114 
  $5,934,638 

in 2026. The Company expects to fully utilize the net operating losses.

The Company follows the guidance of ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes,which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had no uncertain tax
108


positions that it believes should be recognized in the financial statements. The tax years still subject to examination by taxing authorities are years subsequent to 2014. In February 2017, the Company was notified that its federal income tax return for 2014 was to be examined by the Internal Revenue Service. The examination was completed during 2017 with no findings.

2019.

NOTE L - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Company and the Bank provide a deferred compensation arrangement (401(k)(401k plan) whereby employees contribute a percentage of their compensation. For employee contributions of six percent or less, the Company and its subsidiary bank provide a 50% matching contribution. Contributions totaled $512,800$1.5 million in 2017, $339,2002023, $1.2 million in 20162022, and $287,055$1.1 million in 2015.

2021.

The Company sponsors an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for employees who have completed one year of service for the Company and attained age 21. Employees become fully vested after five years of service. Contributions to the plan are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2017,2023, the ESOP held 5,728 shares valued at $168 thousand of Company common stock and had no debt obligation. All shares held by the plan were considered outstanding for net income per share purposes. Total ESOP expense was $3,675$24 thousand for 2017, $5,3462023, $33 thousand for 20162022, and $25,506$3 thousand for 2015.

2021.

In 2014, the Company established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for three active key executives. During 2016, the Company established a SERP for eight additional active key executives. Pursuant to the SERP, these officers are entitled to receive 180 equal monthly payments commencing at the later of obtaining age 65 or separation from service. The costs of such benefits, assuming a retirement date at age 65, will beare accrued by the Company and included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The SERP balance at such retirement date.December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $4.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The Company accrued to expense $241,937$951 thousand for 20172023, $945 thousand for 2022, and $194,164$945 thousand for 2016 and $88,992 for 20152021 for future benefits payable under the SERP. The SERP is an unfunded plan and is considered a general contractual obligation of the Company.

89

Upon the acquisition of Iberville Bank, Southwest Banc Shares, Inc., FMB Banking Corporation, and SWG, the Bank assumed deferred compensation agreements with directors and employees. At December 31, 2017,2023, the total liability of the deferred compensation agreements was $1,189,456.$763 thousand, $1.1 million, $2.6 million, and $273 thousand, respectively. Deferred compensation expense totaled $31,309$24 thousand, $152 thousand, $112 thousand, and $19 thousand, respectively for 2017.

2023.

NOTE M - STOCK PLANS

In 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan provided for the issuance of up to 315,000 shares of Company Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share. In 2015, the Company adopted an amendment to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan which provided for the issuance of an additional 300,000 shares of Company Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share, for a total of 615,000 shares. In 2021, the Company adopted an amendment to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan which provided for the issuance of an additional 500,000 shares of Company Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share, for a total of 1,115,000 shares. Shares issued under the 2007 Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. DuringTotal shares issuable under the plan are 239,964 at year-end 2023, and 167,173 and 129,950 shares were issued in 2023 and 2022, respectively.
A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested shares for the year endedfollows:
Nonvested sharesSharesWeighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2023364,056 $31.88 
Granted167,173  
Vested(54,094) 
Forfeited(12,194) 
Nonvested at December 31, 2023464,941 $31.08 
As of December 31, 2015, 69,327 restricted stock awards were2023, there was $8.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares granted under the Plan. DuringThe costs are expected to be recognized over the yearremaining term of the vesting period
109


(approximately 5 years). The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 61,247 restricted stock awards were granted under the Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 84,286 restricted stock awards were granted under the Plan2023, 2022 and no stock awards were forfeited due to separation. During 2017, 11,867 shares were repurchased for payment of taxes. During 2016, 9,895 shares were repurchased2021 was $1.7 million, $2.5 million, and during 2015, 6,324 shares were repurchased for payment of taxes. The weighted average grant-date fair value for these shares was $27.71 per share. $3.2 million.
Compensation costscost in the amount of $866,558$2.3 million was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2017, $772,3112023, $2.4 million was recognized for the year ended December 31, 20162022 and $721,124$3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2021. Shares of restricted stock granted to employees under this stock plan are subject to restrictions as to the vesting period. The restricted stock award becomes 100% vested on the earliest of 1) the three or five year vesting period provided the Grantee has not incurred a termination of employment prior to that date, 2) the Grantee’s retirement, or 3) the Grantee’s death. During this period, the holder is entitled to full voting rights and dividends. The dividends which are held untilby the Company and only paid if and when the grants are vested. The 2007 Plan also contains a double trigger change-in-control provision pursuant to which unvested shares of stock granted through the plan will be accelerated upon a change in control if the executive is terminated without cause as a result of the transaction (as long as the shares granted remain part of the Company or are transferred into the shares of the new company). As
In 2022, as part of December 31, 2017, there was approximately $3,012,598the BBI acquisition, the Company assumed outstanding options previously granted by BBI under the BBI 2018 Stock Option Plan ("legacy BBI options"). In connection with the assumption of unrecognized compensation expense related to this Plan. The expense is expectedthe legacy BBI options, the Company reserved for issuance 310,427 shares of common stock to be recognized over the remaining termissued upon exercise of the vesting period (approximately 4 years).

such options. These options had a weighted average exercise price of $29.23 and were fully vested upon acquisition.

NOTE N - SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

DEBT

Debentures
On June 30, 2006, the Company issued $4,124,000$4.1 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures to The First Bancshares Statutory Trust 2 in which the Company owns all of the common equity.(“Trust 2”). The debentures are the sole asset of Trust 2, and the Trust. TheCompany is the sole owner of the common equity of Trust 2. Trust 2 issued $4,000,000$4.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’sTrust 2’s obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities wereare redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2036. Interest on the preferred securities is the three month London Interbank Offerthree-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (LIBOR)("SOFR") plus 1.65% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly. The terms of the subordinated debentures are identical to those of the preferred securities.
On July 27, 2007, the Company issued $6,186,000$6.2 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures to The First Bancshares Statutory Trust 3 in which the(“Trust 3”). The Company owns all of the common equity. Theequity of Trust 3, and the debentures are the sole asset of Trust 3. The Trust 3 issued $6,000,000$6.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’sTrust 3’s obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities are redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2037. Interest on the preferred securities is the three month LIBORthree-month term SOFR plus 1.40% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly. The terms of the subordinated debentures are identical to those of the preferred securities.
In 2018, as a result of the acquisition of FMB Banking Corporation ("FMB"), the Company became the successor to FMB's obligations in respect of $6.2 million of floating rate junior subordinated debentures issued to FMB Capital Trust 1 ("FMB Trust"). The debentures are the sole asset of FMB Trust, and the Company is the sole owner of the common equity of FMB Trust. FMB Trust issued $6.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of FMB Trust's obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities issued by the FMB Trust are redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2033. Interest on the preferred securities is the three-month term SOFR plus 2.85% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly.
On January 1, 2023, as a result of the acquisition of HSBI, the Company became the successor to HSBI's obligations in respect of $10.3 million of subordinated debentures issued to Liberty Shares Statutory Trust II ("Liberty Trust"). The debentures are the sole asset of Liberty Trust, and the Company is the sole owner of the common equity of Liberty Trust. Liberty Trust issued $10.0 million of preferred securities to an investor. The Company's obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of
110


Liberty Trust's obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities issued by the Liberty Trust are redeemable by the Company at its option. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2036. Interest on the preferred securities is the three-month term SOFR plus 1.48% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161% and is payable quarterly.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 810,Consolidation,the trustsTrust 2, Trust 3, FMB Trust, and Liberty Trust are not included in the consolidated financial statements.

Notes
On April 30, 2018, The Company entered into two Subordinated Note Purchase Agreements pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $24.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2028 (the "Notes due 2028") and $42.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.40% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2033 (the “Notes due 2033”). In May of 2023, the Company redeemed all $24.0 million of the outstanding 5.875% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2028.
The Notes due 2033 are not convertible into or exchangeable for any other securities or assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Notes due 2033 are not subject to redemption at the option of the holder. Principal and interest on the Notes due 2033 are subject to acceleration only in limited circumstances. The Notes due 2033 are unsecured, subordinated obligations of the Company and rank junior in right to payment to the Company’s current and future senior indebtedness, and each Note is pari passu in right to payment with respect to the other Notes. The Notes due 2033 have a fifteen year term, maturing May 1, 2033, and will bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.40%, payable quarterly in arrears, for the first ten years of the term. Thereafter, the interest rate will re-set quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate (which is expected to be three-month term SOFR plus 3.39% plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.026161%), payable quarterly in arrears. As provided in the Notes due 2033, under specified conditions the interest rate on the Notes due 2033 during the applicable floating rate period may be determined based on a rate other than Three-Month Term SOFR. The Company is entitled to redeem the Notes due 2033, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date on or after May 1, 2028, and to redeem the Notes due 2033 at any time in whole upon certain other specified events.
On September 25, 2020, The Company entered into a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with certain qualified institutional buyers pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $65.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 4.25% Fixed to Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030 (the "Notes due 2030"). The Notes due 2030 are unsecured and have a ten-year term, maturing October 1, 2030, and will bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 4.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears, for the first five years of the term. Thereafter, the interest rate will reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate (which is expected to be the Three-Month Term SOFR plus 412.6 basis points), payable quarterly in arrears. As provided in the Notes due 2030, under specified conditions the interest rate on the Notes due 2030 during the applicable floating rate period may be determined based on a rate other than Three-Month Term SOFR. The Company is entitled to redeem the Notes due 2030, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date on or after October 1, 2025, and to redeem the Notes due 2030 at any time in whole upon certain other specified events.
The Company had $123.4 million of subordinated debt, net of deferred issuance costs $1.6 million and unamortized fair value mark $2.1 million, at December 31, 2023, compared to $145.0 million, net of deferred issuance costs $1.9 million and unamortized fair value mark $593 thousand, at December 31, 2022. The decrease in subordinated debt was attributable to the Company's redemption of $24.0 million of its Notes due 2028 and the Company's repayment of $2.0 million of its Notes due 2030 in May of 2023, which resulted in the Company recording a $217 thousand gain on the repurchased debt. The decrease in subordinated debt was partially offset by the addition of $9.0 million, net purchase accounting adjustments, of subordinated debt that the Company acquired as part of the HSBI acquisition.
NOTE O - TREASURY STOCK

Shares held in treasury totaled 26,4941,249,607 at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 1,249,607 at December 31, 2022 and 2015.

649,607 at December 31, 2021.

On February 8, 2022, the Company announced the renewal of the 2021 Repurchase Program that previously expired on December 31, 2021. Under the renewed 2021 Repurchase Program, the Company could repurchase up to an aggregate of $30.0 million of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management, less the amount of prior purchases under the program during the 2021 calendar year. The renewed 2021 Repurchase Program was completed in February 2022 when the Company’s repurchases under the program
111


approached the maximum authorized amount. The Company repurchased 600,000 shares under the 2021 Repurchase Program in the first quarter of 2022.
On March 9, 2022, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the “2022 Repurchase Program”), pursuant to which the Company could purchase up to an aggregate of $30.0 million in shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock during the 2022 calendar year. Under the program, the Company could, but was not required to, from time to time repurchase up $30.0 million of shares of its own common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management. The actual timing and method of any purchases, the target number of shares and the maximum price (or range of prices) under the program, was determined by management at is discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The 2022 Repurchase Program expired on December 31, 2022.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 signed into law in August 2022 includes a provision for an excise tax equal to 1% of the fair market value of any stock repurchased by covered corporations during a taxable year, subject to certain limits and provisions. The excise tax is effective beginning in fiscal year 2023. While we may complete transactions subject to the new excise tax, we do not expect a material impact to our statement of condition or result of operations.
On February 28, 2023, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2023 Repurchase Program"), pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $50.0 million in shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock during the 2023 calendar year. Under the program, the Company may, but is not required to, from time to time repurchase up $50.0 million of shares of its own common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management. The actual timing and method of any purchases, the target number of shares and the maximum price (or range of prices) under the program, will be determined by management at is discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The 2023 Repurchase Program expired on December 31, 2023.
On February 28, 2024, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2024 Repurchase Program"), pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $50.0 million in shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock during the 2024 calendar year. Under the program, the Company may, but is not required to, from time to time repurchase up $50.0 million of shares of its own common stock in any manner determined appropriate by the Company’s management. The actual timing and method of any purchases, the target number of shares and the maximum price (or range of prices) under the program, will be determined by management at is discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, general market and economic conditions, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The 2024 Repurchase Program will expire on December 31, 2024.
NOTE P - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes loans to its directors and executive officers and to companies in which they have a significant ownership interest. In the opinion of management, these loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other parties, are consistent with sound banking practices, and are within applicable regulatory and lending limitations. Such loans amounted to approximately $15,137,000$23.7 million and $15,788,000$28.3 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. The activity in loans to current directors, executive officers, and their affiliates during the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, is summarized as follows (in thousands):

follows:
($ in thousands)90
Loans outstanding at beginning of year$28,338 
Advances/new loans725 
Removed/payments(5,383)
Loans outstanding at end of year$23,680 

Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at year-end 2023 and 2022 were $15.6 million and $16.8 million.

Loans outstanding at beginning of year $15,788 
New loans  250 
Repayments  (901)
Loans outstanding at end of year $15,137 

112


NOTE Q - COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES, AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

In the normal course of business, there are outstanding various commitments and contingent liabilities, such as guaranties, commitments to extend credit, overdraft protection, etc., which are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements. The subsidiary bank had outstanding letters of credit of $8,207,000 and $1,742,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and had made loan commitments of approximately $281,381,000 and $220,252,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit include some exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance of the customer. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit policies and procedures for such commitments are the same as those used for lending activities. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates and because a number expire without being drawn upon, they generally do not present any significant liquidity risk. No significant losses on commitments were incurred during the two years ended December 31, 2017,2023 and 2022, nor are any significant losses as a result of these transactions anticipated.

The primary market areas servedcontractual amounts of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk at year-end were as follows:
20232022
($ in thousands)
Fixed Rate
Variable Rate
Fixed Rate
Variable Rate
Commitments to make loans$34,380 $50,226 $43,227 $15,758 
Unused lines of credit231,335 605,646 243,043 404,025 
Standby letters of credit15,573 13,114 4,260 9,909 
Commitments to make loans are generally made for periods of 90 days or less. The fixed rate loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 1.0% to 18.0% and maturities ranging from 1 year to 30 years.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (“ACL”) ON OFF BALANCE SHEET CREDIT (“OBSC”) Exposures
The Company adopted ASC 326, effective January 1, 2021, which requires the Company to estimate expected credit losses for OBSC exposures which are not unconditionally cancellable. The Company maintains a separate ACL on OBSC exposures, including unfunded commitments and letters of credit, which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. The ACL on OBSC exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life.
Changes in the ACL on OBSC exposures were as follows for the presented periods:
($ in thousands)202320222021
Balance at beginning of period$1,325$1,070$
Adoption of ASU 326718
Credit loss expense related to OBSC exposures750255352
Balance at end of period$2,075$1,325$1,070
Adjustments to the ACL on OBSC exposures are recorded to provision for credit losses OBSC exposures. The Company recorded $750 thousand, $255 thousand, and $352 thousand to the provision for credit losses OBSC exposures for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 respectively. The increase in the ACL on OBSC exposures for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 was due to the day one provision for unfunded commitments related to the HSBI acquisition and an increase in unfunded commitments.
No credit loss estimate is reported for OBSC exposures that are unconditionally cancellable by the Bank are Forrest, Lamar, Jones, Pearl River, Jackson, Hancock, Stone, Harrison Counties within SouthCompany or for undrawn amounts under such arrangements that may be drawn prior to the cancellation on the arrangement.
The Company currently has 110 full-service banking and financial service offices, one motor bank facility and five loan production offices across Mississippi, Madison County in Central Mississippi, as well as Washington Parish, St. Tammany Parish, Plaquemine ParishAlabama, Florida, Georgia, and East Baton Rouge Parish in Louisiana, Baldwin and Mobile Counties in South Alabama, and Escambia County in Northwestern Florida.Louisiana. Management closely monitors its credit concentrations and attempts to diversify the portfolio within its primary market area. As of December 31, 2017,2023, management does not consider there to be any significant credit concentrations within the loan portfolio. Although the
113


Bank’s loan portfolio, as well as existing commitments, reflects the diversity of its primary market area, a substantial portion of a borrower's ability to repay a loan is dependent upon the economic stability of the area.

In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiary are subject to pending and threatened legal actions. Although the Company is not able to predict the outcome of such actions, after reviewing pending and threatened actions with counsel, management believes that based on the information currently available the outcome of such actions, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE R - FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The Company follows the guidance of ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, that which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

The guidance defines the fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

In accordance with the guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities which use observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities.
Level 3:Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

91

Level 1:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Following

Level 2:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities which use observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities.
Level 3:Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and Cash Equivalents – For such short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a descriptionreasonable estimate of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Available-for-Salevalue.

Debt Securities

-The fair value of available-for-sale securities is determined by various valuation methodologies. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1. Level 1 securities include mutual funds. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Level 2 securities include U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

The following table presents the Company’s available-for-sale For securities thatwhere quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are measured atnot available, fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (In thousands):

     Fair Value Measurements Using 
     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
For
Identical Assets
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
  Fair Value  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
December 31, 2017            
             
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies $4,992  $-  $4,992  $- 
Municipal securities  138,584   -   138,584   - 
Mortgage-backed securities  196,578   -   196,578   - 
Corporate obligations  15,819   -   13,250   2,569 
Other  920   920   -   - 
Total $356,893  $920  $353,404  $2,569 

     Fair Value Measurements Using 
     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
For
Identical Assets
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
  Fair Value  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
December 31, 2016            
             
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies $9,045  $-  $9,045  $- 
Municipal securities  98,822   -   98,822   - 
Mortgage-backed  securities  114,289   -   114,289   - 
Corporate obligations  20,110   -   17,869   2,241 
Other  940   940   -   - 
Total $243,206  $940  $240,025  $2,241 

The following is a reconciliation of activity for assets measured at fair value based on significant unobservable (non-market) information.

92

(In thousands) Bank-Issued Trust
Trust Preferred
Securities
 
  2017  2016  2015 
Balance of recurring Level 3 assets at January 1 $2,241  $2,557  $2,801 
Transfers into Level 3  -   -   - 
Transfers out of Level 3  -   -   - 
Unrealized income (loss) included in comprehensive Income  328   (316)  (244)
Balance of recurring Level 3 assets at December 31 $2,569  $2,241  $2,557 

The following table presents quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurements (in thousands):

Trust Preferred
Securities
 Fair Value  Valuation Technique Significant
 Unobservable Inputs
 Range of Inputs
December 31, 2017 $2,569  Discounted cash flow Discount rate 2.07% - 3.77%
December 31, 2016 $2,241  Discounted cash flow Discount rate 1.50% - 3.34%
December 31, 2015 $2,557  Discounted cash flow Discount rate 1.08% - 2.77%

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired Loans

Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual termsvalues are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for estimating fair value include using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans or, where a loan is determined not to be collateral dependent,calculated using the discounted cash flow method.

If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value. If the impaired loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, then the discounted cash flow method is used. This method requires the impaired loan to be recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The effective interest rate of a loan is the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs, premiums or discounts existing at origination or acquisition of the loan. Impaired loans are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned consists of properties obtained through foreclosure. The adjustment at the time of foreclosure is recorded through the allowance for loan losses. Fair value of other real estate owned is based on current independent appraisals. Due to the subjective nature of establishing the fair value when the asset is acquired, the actual fair value of the other real estate owned or foreclosed asset could differ from the original estimate. If it is determined the fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through other income. Operating costs associated with the assets after acquisition are also recorded as non-interest expense. Gains and losses on the disposition of other real estate owned and foreclosed assets are netted and recorded in other income. Other real estate owned measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2017, amounted to $7,158,409. Other real estate owned is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (In thousands)market indicators (Level 3).

93

     Fair Value Measurements Using 
     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
For
Identical Assets
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
  Fair Value  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
December 31, 2017            
             
Impaired loans $10,574  $-  $10,574  $- 
Other real estate owned  7,158   -   7,158   - 
                 
December 31, 2016                
                 
Impaired loans $6,128  $-  $6,128  $- 
Other real estate owned  6,007   -   6,007   - 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – For such short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment in securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity – The fair value measurement for securities available-for-sale was discussed earlier. The same measurement approach was used for securities held-to-maturity and other securities.

Loans – The fair value of loans iswas estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows using the current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Bank-owned Life Insurance– Thematurities, in accordance with the exit price notion as defined by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement ("ASC 820"). Expected future cash flows were projected based on contractual cash flows, adjusted for estimated prepayments and as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01, which also included credit risk and other market factors to calculate the exit price fair value in accordance with ASC 820.

114


Loans Held for Sale - Loans held for sale are carried at fair value in the aggregate as determined by the outstanding commitments from investors. As, such we classify those loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2 of bank-owned life insurance approximates the fair value hierarchy.
Interest Rate Swaps - The Company offers interest rate swaps to certain commercial loan customers to allow them to hedge the risk of rising interest rates on their variable rate loans. The Company originates a variable rate loan and enters into a variable to fixed interest rate swap with the customer. The Company also enters into an offsetting swap with a correspondent bank. These back-to-back agreements are intended to offset each other and allow the Company to originate a variable rate loan, while providing the contract or fixed interest payments for the customer. In addition, the Company will enter into risk participation agreements ("RPA"). Under an RPA-in agreement, a derivative liability, the Company assumes, or participates in, a portion of the credit risk associated with the interest rate swap position with the commercial borrower, for a fee received from the other bank. Under an RPA-out agreement, a derivative asset, the Company participates out a portion of the credit risk associated with the interest rate swap position executed with the commercial borrower, for a fee paid to the participating bank. RPAs are derivative financial instruments recorded at fair value. Although we have determined that a majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit assumptions associated with our risk participation agreements utilize Level 3 inputs.
Accrued Interest Receivable – The carrying amount because upon liquidation of theseaccrued interest receivable approximates fair value and is classified as level 2 for accrued interest receivable related to investments the Company would receive the cash surrender value which equals the carrying amount.

securities and Level 3 for accrued interest receivable related to loans.

Deposits – The fair values of demand deposits are, as required by ASC Topic 825, equal to the carrying value of such deposits. Demand deposits include non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and money market demand accounts. The fair value of variable rate term deposits, those repricing within six months or less, approximates the carrying value of these deposits. Discounted cash flows have been used to value fixed rate term deposits and variable rate term deposits repricing after six months. The discount rate used is based on interest rates currently being offered on comparable deposits as to amount and term.

Short-Term Borrowings – The carrying value of any federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings approximates their fair values.

FHLB and Other Borrowings – The fair value of the fixed rate borrowings areis estimated using discounted cash flows, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount of any variable rate borrowing approximates its fair value.

Subordinated Debentures –Fair values are determined based on the current market value of like instruments of a similar maturity and structure.
Accrued Interest Payable – The subordinated debentures bearcarrying amount of accrued interest atpayable approximates fair value resulting in a variable rate and the carrying value approximates the fair value.

Level 2 classification.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments Fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements. However, commitments to extend credit do not represent a significant value until such commitments are funded or closed. Management has determined that these instruments do not have a distinguishable fair value and no fair value has been assigned.

115


The following table presents the Company’s securities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
December 31, 2023Fair Value Measurements
($ in thousands)Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets
For
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
Available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury$16,675 $16,675 $— $— 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities104,923 — 104,923 — 
Municipal securities438,466 — 420,283 18,183 
Mortgage-backed Securities441,661 — 441,661 — 
Corporate obligations37,597 — 37,567 30 
Other3,043 — 3,043 — 
Total investment securities available-for-sale$1,042,365 $16,675 $1,007,477 $18,213 
Loans held for sale2,914 — 2,914 — 
Interest rate swaps$12,170 $— $12,129 $41 
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps$12,175 $— $12,129 $46 
December 31, 2022Fair Value Measurements
($ in thousands)Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets
For
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
Available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury$123,854 $123,854 $— $— 
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities144,369 — 144,369 — 
Municipal securities457,857 — 442,740 15,117 
Mortgage-backed securities490,139 — 490,139 — 
Corporate obligations40,882 — 40,851 31 
Total investment securities available-for-sale$1,257,101 $123,854 $1,118,099 $15,148 
Loans held for sale$4,443 $— $4,443 $— 
Interest rate swaps$12,825 $— $12,825 $— 
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps$12,825 $— $12,825 $— 
The following is a reconciliation of activity for assets measured at fair value based on significant unobservable (Level 3) information:
116


Bank-Issued Trust
Preferred Securities
($ in thousands)20232022
Balance, January 1$31 $43 
Paydowns(1)(12)
Balance, December 31$30 $31 
Municipal Securities
($ in thousands)20232022
Balance, January 1$15,117 $20,123 
Maturities, calls and paydowns(2,639)(2,328)
Transfer from level 2 to level 36,085 — 
Unrealized (loss) gain included in comprehensive income(380)(2,678)
Balance, December 31$18,183$15,117
Interest Rate Swaps - Risk Participations
($ in thousands)942023
Balance, January 1$— 
RPA-in(46)
RPA-out41 
Balance at December 31$(5)
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2023 and 2022. The following tables present quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurements:
($ in thousands)
Bank-Issued Trust Preferred SecuritiesFair ValueValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable
Inputs
Range of Inputs
December 31, 2023$30 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate7.81% - 7.89%
December 31, 2022$31 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate6.98% - 7.19%

Municipal SecuritiesFair ValueValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable
Inputs
Range of Inputs
December 31, 2023$18,183Discounted cash flowDiscount rate2.34% - 5.50%
December 31, 2022$15,117Discounted cash flowDiscount rate3.00% - 4.00%

As of December 31, 2017       Fair Value Measurements 
(In thousands) Carrying
Amount
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
                
Financial Instruments:                    
Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $91,922  $91,922  $91,922  $-  $- 
Securities available-for-sale  356,893   356,893   920   353,404   2,569 
Securities held-to-maturity  6,000   7,398   -   7,398   - 
Other securities  9,969   9,969   -   9,969   - 
Loans, net  1,221,808   1,238,525   -   -   1,238,525 
Bank-owned life insurance  27,054   27,054   -   27,054   - 
                     
Liabilities:                    
Non-interest-bearing deposits $301,989  $301,989  $-  $301,989  $- 
Interest-bearing deposits  1,168,576   1,165,682   -   1,165,682   - 
Subordinated debentures  10,310   10,310   -   -   10,310 
FHLB and other borrowings  104,072   104,072   -   104,072   - 

As of December 31, 2017       Fair Value Measurements 
(In thousands) Carrying
Amount
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Financial Instruments:                    
Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $62,119  $62,119  $62,119  $-  $- 
Securities available-for-sale  243,206   243,206   940   240,025   2,241 
Securities held-to-maturity  6,000   7,394   -   7,394   - 
Other securities  6,593   6,593   -   6,593   - 
Loans, net  865,424   883,161   -   -   883,161 
Bank-owned life insurance  21,250   21,250   -   21,250   - 
                     
Liabilities:                    
Non-interest-bearing deposits $202,478  $202,478  $-  $202,478  $- 
Interest-bearing deposits  836,713   835,658   -   835,658   - 
Subordinated debentures  10,310   10,310   -   -   10,310 
FHLB and other borrowings  69,000   69,000   -   69,000   - 

Interest Rate Swaps - Risk ParticipationsFair ValueValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable
Inputs
Range of Inputs
December 31, 2023$(5)Credit Value AdjustmentCredit Spread225 bps - 300 bps
Recovery Rate70%
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
117


Collateral Dependent Loans
Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment. If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income date available for similar loans and collateral underlying such loans. Such adjustments, if any, result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. The Company adjusts the appraisal for cost associated with litigation and collections. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned consists of properties obtained through foreclosure. The adjustment at the time of foreclosure is recorded through the allowance for credit losses. Fair value of other real estate owned is based on current independent appraisals of the collateral less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new costs basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals, which are updated no less frequently than annually. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach with data from comparable properties. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments, if any, result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. In the determination of fair value subsequent to foreclosure, management also considers other factors or recent developments, such as changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and anticipated sales values considering plans for disposition, which could result in an adjustment to lower the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals. The Company adjust the appraisal 10 percent for carrying costs. Periodic revaluations are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy since assumptions are used that may not be observable in the market. Due to the subjective nature of establishing the fair value when the asset is acquired, the actual fair value of the other real estate owned or foreclosed asset could differ from the original estimate. If it is determined the fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through other income. Operating costs associated with the assets after acquisition are also recorded as non-interest expense. Gains and losses on the disposition of other real estate owned and foreclosed assets are netted and recorded in other income. Other real estate measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2023, amounted to $8.3 million. Other real estate owned is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements were reported at December 31, 2023 and 2022:
Fair Value Measurements Using
($ in thousands)Fair ValueQuoted Prices in
Active Markets
For
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
December 31, 2023
Collateral dependent loans$2,494 $— $— $2,494 
Other real estate owned8,320 — — 8,320 
December 31, 2022
Collateral dependent loans$5,552 $— $— $5,552 
Other real estate owned4,832 — — 4,832 
118


Estimated fair values for the Company's financial instruments are as follows, as of the dated noted:
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2023Carrying
Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Quoted
Prices
(Level 1)
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
($ in thousands)
Financial Instruments:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$355,147 $355,147 $355,147 $— $— 
Securities available-for-sale1,042,365 1,042,365 16,675 1,007,477 18,213 
Securities held-to-maturity654,539 615,944 — 615,944 — 
Loans held for sale2,914 2,914 — 2,914 — 
Loans, net5,116,010 4,877,935 — — 4,877,935 
Accrued interest receivable33,300 33,300 — 8,632 24,668 
Interest rate swaps12,170 12,170 — 12,129 41 
Liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing deposits$1,849,013 $1,849,013 $— $1,849,013 $— 
Interest-bearing deposits4,613,859 4,430,227 — 4,430,227 — 
Subordinated debentures123,386 109,426 — — 109,426 
FHLB and other borrowings390,000 390,000 — 390,000 — 
Accrued interest payable22,702 22,702 — 22,702 — 
Interest rate swaps12,175 12,175 — 12,129 46 
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2022Carrying
Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Quoted
Prices
(Level 1)
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
($ in thousands)
Financial Instruments:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$145,315 $145,315 $145,315 $— $— 
Securities available-for-sale1,257,101 1,257,101 123,854 1,118,099 15,148 
Securities held-to-maturity691,484 642,097 — 642,097 — 
Loans held for sale4,443 4,443 — 4,443 — 
Loans, net3,735,240 3,681,313 — — 3,681,313 
Accrued interest receivable27,723 27,723 — 9,757 17,966 
Interest rate swaps12,825 12,825 — 12,825 — 
Liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing deposits$1,630,203 $1,630,203 $— $1,630,203 $— 
Interest-bearing deposits3,864,201 3,505,990 — 3,505,990 — 
Subordinated debentures145,027 133,816 — — 133,816 
FHLB and other borrowings130,100 130,100 — 130,100 — 
Accrued interest payable3,324 3,324 — 3,324 — 
Interest rate swaps12,825 12,825 — 12,825 — 
119


NOTE S - PREFERRED STOCK

PursuantREVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

All of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers within the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within non-interest income. The guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and investment securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, which comprise a significant portion of our revenue stream. A description of the termsCompany’s revenue streams accounted for under ASC 606 is as follows:
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts: The Company earns fees from deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed at the point in the time the Company fulfills the customer’s request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a letter agreement betweenmonth, representing the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), the Company issued 17,123 CDCI Preferred Shares.

95

The Letter Agreement contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the common stock to no more than 100% of the aggregate per share dividend and distributions for the immediate prior fiscal year (dividends were declared and paid in 2011 through 2016) and on the Company’s ability to repurchase its common stock in the event of a non-payment of our dividend, and continues to subject the Company to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), as previously disclosed by the Company. The CDCI Preferred Shares entitle the holder to an annual dividend of 2% for 8 years of the liquidation value of the shares, payable quarterly in arrears.

On May 13, 2015, The First Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Letter Agreement (the “Letter Agreement”), with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), pursuant toperiod over which the Company redeemedsatisfies the Warrantperformance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.

Interchange Income: The Company earns interchange fees from debit and credit card holder transaction conducted through various payment networks. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided by the cardholder.
Gains/Losses on Sales of OREO: The Company records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers to purchase upthe buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Company finances the sale of OREO to 54,705 sharesthe buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether the collectability of the transaction prices is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on the sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and related gain (loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present.
All of the Company’s common stock, no par value per share (the “Common Stock”) issued to Treasury on February 6, 2009 underrevenue from contracts with customers in the Capital Purchase Program. In connection with this redemption, on May 13, 2015,scope of ASC 606 is recognized within non-interest income. The following table presents the Company paid Treasury an aggregate redemption priceCompany’s sources of $302,410.

On December 6, 2016, the Company repurchased all 17,123 shares of its CDCI Preferred Shares at fair market value of $15,925,000, which equated to a discount of 7% to par, or $1,198,000.

On October 14, 2016, the Company issued 3,563,380 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock at $17.75 per share in a private placement offering and received approximately $59,744,000 in net proceeds after offering expenses of $3,506,000. The net proceeds from this private placement were used to finance the Iberville Bank acquisition and pay related expenses, to support our capital ratios in connection with the Iberville Bank acquisition and Gulf Coast Community Bank acquisition, andnon-interest income for general corporate purposes. All 3,563,380 shares of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 3,563,380 shares of common stock on January 4, 2017, following shareholder approval. Dividends were declared and paid on the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock.

NOTE T – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated by management through the date the financial statements were issued.

On March 1, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Southwest Banc Shares, Inc., (“Southwest”), and immediately thereafter merged First Community Bank with and into The First. The Company paid a total consideration of approximately $60.0 million in stock and cash. At December 31, 2017, First Community Bank had $400.6 million in total assets.

2023, 2022, and 2021. Items outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such.
($ in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2023
Commercial/
Retail
Bank
Mortgage
Banking
Division
Holding
Company
Total
Revenue by Operating Segments
Non-interest income
Service charges on deposits
Overdraft fees$8,154 $— $— $8,154 
Other6,021 — — 6,021 
Interchange income18,914 — — 18,914 
Investment brokerage fees1,623 — — 1,623 
Net gains on OREO— — 
Net losses on sales of securities (1)(9,716)— — (9,716)
Gain on premises and equipment35 — — 35 
Gain on sale of loans1,512 — — 1,512 
Other10,307 2,866 6,983 20,156 
Total non-interest income$36,856 $2,866 $6,983 $46,705 
120


($ in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2022
Commercial/
Retail
Bank
Mortgage
Banking
Division
Holding
Company
Total
Revenue by Operating Segments
Non-interest income
Service charges on deposits
Overdraft fees$4,023 $93 $— $4,116 
Other8,679 — — 8,679 
Interchange income12,702 — — 12,702 
Investment brokerage fees1,566 — — 1,566 
Net gains on OREO214 — — 214 
Net losses on sales of securities (1)(82)— — (82)
Gain on acquisition (1)281 — — 281 
Loss on premises and equipment(116)— — (116)
Other2,724 4,210 2,667 9,601 
Total non-interest income$29,991 $4,303 $2,667 $36,961 
($ in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2021
Commercial/
Retail
Bank
Mortgage
Banking
Division
Holding
Company
Total
Revenue by Operating Segments
Non-interest income
Service charges on deposits
Overdraft fees$3,122 $— $— $3,122 
Other4,140 — 4,142 
Interchange income11,562 — — 11,562 
Investment brokerage fees1,349 — — 1,349 
Net (losses) on OREO(300)— — (300)
Net gains on sales of securities (1)143 — — 143 
Gain on acquisition (1)1,300 — — 1,300 
Loss on premises and equipment(264)— — (264)
Other7,487 8,821 111 16,419 
Total non-interest income$28,539 $8,823 $111 $37,473 

In connection with the acquisition, preliminarily, the Company expects to record approximately $26.3 million

(1)Not within scope of goodwill and $3.3 million of core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is to be expensed over 10 years.

The Company acquired the $278 million loan portfolio at an estimated fair value discount of $4.4 million. The discount represents expected credit losses, adjusted for market interest rates and liquidity adjustments.

Expenses associated with the acquisition were $3.6 million for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2017. These costs included charges associated with due diligence as well as legal and consulting expenses, which have been expensed as incurred.

The following unaudited pro-forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2017, gives effect to the acquisition as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2017. The pro-forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations had the acquisition been effective as of this date.

(In thousands) Pro-Forma 
  December 31, 2017 
  (unaudited) 
    
Net interest income $73,250 
Non-interest income  17,481 
Total revenue  90,731 
Income before income taxes $17,930 

Supplemental pro-forma earnings for 2017 were adjusted to exclude acquisition costs incurred during 2017.

To fund the cash portion of the purchase price for the Company’s announced acquisition of Southwest, to fund other potential future acquisitions, and for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of debt and to support organic growth, the Company completed a sale in October, 2017, of an aggregate of 2,012,500 shares of its common stock in a public offering. Net proceeds after underwriting discounts and estimated expenses were approximately $55.2 million.

96
ASC 606.

121

On December 6, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Sunshine Financial, Inc. (“Sunshine”), parent company of Sunshine Community Bank, whereby Sunshine will be merged with and into the Company (the “Sunshine Merger”). Sunshine’s wholly owned subsidiary bank, Sunshine Community Bank, (“Sunshine Community Bank”) will be merged with and into The First immediately following the Sunshine Merger. At December 31, 2017, Sunshine Community Bank had total assets of approximately $200.7 million. This transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018, subject to shareholder approval. Regulatory approval was received February 27, 2018.



NOTE UT - PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The balance sheets, statements of income and cash flows for The First Bancshares, Inc. (parent company only) follow.

follows:

Condensed Balance Sheets

  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $20,435,721  $69,158 
Investment in subsidiary bank  226,648,005   179,541,693 
Investments in statutory trusts  310,000   310,000 
Other  1,480,791   1,112,514 
  $248,874,517  $181,033,365 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:        
Subordinated debentures $10,310,000  $10,310,000 
Advances from First Tennessee Bank  16,000,000   16,000,000 
Other  96,597   196,658 
Stockholders’ equity  222,467,920   154,526,707 
  $248,874,517  $181,033,365 

December 31,
($ in thousands)20232022
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$13,485 $9,843 
Investment in subsidiary bank1,056,369 778,885 
Investments in statutory trusts806 496 
Bank owned life insurance348 333 
Other3,275 3,962 
$1,074,283 $793,519 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:  
Subordinated debentures$123,386 $145,027 
Other1,863 1,830 
Stockholders’ equity949,034 646,663 
$1,074,283 $793,519 
Condensed Statements of Income

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Income:            
Interest and dividends $8,296  $6,680  $5,573 
Dividend income  3,675,000   2,875,000   1,650,000 
Other  51,030   -   - 
   3,734,326   2,881,680   1,655,573 
Expenses:            
Interest on borrowed funds  859,823   222,152   185,351 
Legal and professional  1,097,590   910,214   295,637 
Other  1,349,143   1,240,863   833,502 
   3,306,556   2,373,229   1,314,490 
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiary  427,770   508,451   341,083 
Income tax benefit  1,222,012   835,757   487,853 
Income before equity in undistributed income of Subsidiary  1,649,782   1,344,208   828,936 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary  8,966,694   8,774,479   7,969,766 
             
Net income $10,616,476  $10,118,687  $8,798,702 

97

Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)202320222021
Income:
Interest and dividends$36 $17 $10 
Dividend income65,000 16,000 — 
Other6,983 2,667 111 
72,019 18,684 121 
Expenses:   
Interest on borrowed funds7,970 7,492 7,375 
Legal and professional1,136 593 941 
Other6,266 7,498 4,828 
15,372 15,583 13,144 
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiary56,647 3,101 (13,023)
Income tax benefit2,005 3,263 3,295 
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed income of subsidiary58,652 6,364 (9,728)
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary16,805 56,555 73,895 
Net income$75,457 $62,919 $64,167 

122


Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income $10,616,476  $10,118,687  $8,798,702 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:            
Equity in undistributed income of Subsidiary  (8,966,694)  (8,774,479)  (7,969,766)
Restricted stock expense  866,558   772,311   721,124 
Gain on disposition of CVR  (51,030)  -   - 
Other, net  (624,261)  (669,047)  151,251 
Net cash provided by operating activities  1,841,049   1,447,472   1,701,311 
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Investment in subsidiary bank  (35,000,000)  (60,000,000)  - 
Outlays for acquisitions  -   -   (35,709)
Net cash used in investing activities  (35,000,000)  (60,000,000)  (35,709)
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Dividends paid on common stock  (1,415,524)  (782,936)  (778,428)
Dividends paid on preferred stock  -   (452,305)  (342,460)
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of Taxes  (329,587)  (176,112)  (92,390)
Repurchase of warrants  -   -   (302,410)
Net proceeds from issuance of 3,563,380 shares  -   59,744,418   - 
Net proceeds from issuance of 2,012,500 shares  55,270,625         
Repayment of CDCI Preferred Shares  -   (15,925,000)  - 
Proceeds of borrowed funds  -   16,000,000   - 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing Activities  53,525,514   58,408,065   (1,515,688)
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash Equivalents  20,366,563   (144,463)  149,914 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  69,158   213,621   63,707 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $20,435,721  $69,158  $213,621 

98

Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)202320222021
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$75,457 $62,919 $64,167 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Equity in undistributed income of Subsidiary(16,805)(56,555)(73,895)
Restricted stock expense2,302 2,425 3,100 
Other, net9,263 6,255 (3,343)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities70,217 15,044 (9,970)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in bank— (1,300)— 
Other, net— 290 — 
Net cash (used in) investing activities— (1,010)— 
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid on common stock(27,550)(16,275)(11,991)
Repurchase of restricted stock for payment of taxes(361)(683)(721)
Common stock repurchased— (22,180)(5,171)
Repayment of borrowed funds— — (4,647)
Called/repayment of subordinated debt(31,000)— — 
Other, net(7,664)216 — 
Net cash (used in) financing activities(66,575)(38,922)(22,530)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents3,642 (24,888)(32,500)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year9,843 34,731 67,231 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$13,485 $9,843 $34,731 

123


NOTE VU - OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company is considered to have three principal business segments in 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, the Commercial/Retail Bank, the Mortgage Banking Division, and the Holding Company. (In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  Commercial/  Mortgage       
  Retail  Banking  Holding    
  Bank  Division  Company  Total 
             
Interest income $65,118  $943  $8  $66,069 
Interest expense  6,048   1   860   6,909 
Net interest income (loss)  59,070   942   (852)  59,160 
Provision (credit) for loan losses  475   31   -   506 
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses  58,595   911   (852)  58,654 
Non-interest income  9,807   4,505   51   14,363 
Non-interest expense  49,143   3,857   2,446   55,446 
                 
Income (loss) before income taxes  19,259   1,559   (3,247)  17,571 
Income tax (benefit) expense  7,740   437   (1,222)  6,955 
Net income (loss) $11,519  $1,122  $(2,025) $10,616 
                 
Total Assets $1,758,778  $32,234  $22,226  $1,813,238 
Net Loans  1,196,365   25,443   -   1,221,808 

  Year Ended December 31, 2016 
  Commercial/  Mortgage       
  Retail  Banking  Holding    
  Bank  Division  Company  Total 
             
Interest income $43,785  $812  $7  $44,604 
Interest expense  3,679   414   222   4,315 
Net interest income (loss)  40,106   398   (215)  40,289 
Provision (credit) for loan   losses  667   (42)  -   625 
Net interest income (loss)  after provision  for loan losses  39,439   440   (215)  39,664 
Non-interest income  6,989   4,258   -   11,247 
Non-interest expense  31,369   3,342   2,151   36,862 
Income (loss) before income  taxes  15,059   1,356   (2,366)  14,049 
Income tax (benefit) expense  4,386   380   (836)  3,930 
Net income (loss) $10,673  $976  $(1,530) $10,119 
                 
Total Assets $1,254,476  $21,400  $1,491  $1,277,367 
Net Loans  851,947   13,477   -   865,424 

  Year Ended December 31, 2015 
  Commercial/  Mortgage       
  Retail  Banking  Holding    
  Bank  Division  Company  Total 
             
Interest income $39,422  $774  $6  $40,202 
Interest expense  2,727   296   185   3,208 
Net interest income (loss)  36,695   478   (179)  36,994 
Provision for loan losses  410   -   -   410 
Net interest income (loss)  after provision  for loan losses  36,285   478   (179)  36,584 
Non-interest income  6,513   1,075   -   7,588 
Non-interest expense  29,786   1,245   1,129   32,160 
Income (loss) before income  taxes  13,012   308   (1,308)  12,012 
Income tax (benefit) expense  3,618  ��82   (487)  3,213 
Net income (loss) $9,394  $226  $(821) $8,799 
Total Assets $1,123,240  $20,681  $1,210  $1,145,131 
Net Loans  755,077   14,665   -   769,742 

99

($ in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2023
Commercial/
Retail
Bank
Mortgage
Banking
Division
Holding
Company
Total
Interest income$340,566 $331 $36 $340,933 
Interest expense83,497 141 7,970 91,608 
Net interest income (loss)257,069 190 (7,934)249,325 
Provision (credit) for credit losses14,500 — — 14,500 
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses242,569 190 (7,934)234,825 
Non-interest income36,856 2,866 6,983 46,705 
Non-interest expense172,133 5,191 7,402 184,726 
Income (loss) before income taxes107,292 (2,135)(8,353)96,804 
Income tax (benefit) expense23,892 (540)(2,005)21,347 
Net income (loss)$83,400 $(1,595)$(6,348)$75,457 
Total Assets$7,971,373 $10,058 $17,914 $7,999,345 
Net Loans5,114,434 4,490 — 5,118,924 

($ in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2022
Commercial/
Retail
Bank
Mortgage
Banking
Division
Holding
Company
Total
Interest income$199,937 $439 $17 $200,393 
Interest expense14,979 106 7,492 22,577 
Net interest income (loss)184,958 333 (7,475)177,816 
Provision (credit) for loan losses5,605 — — 5,605 
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses179,353 333 (7,475)172,211 
Non-interest income29,991 4,303 2,667 36,961 
Non-interest expense116,899 5,493 8,091 130,483 
Income (loss) before income taxes92,445 (857)(12,899)78,689 
Income tax (benefit) expense19,250 (217)(3,263)15,770 
Net income (loss)$73,195 $(640)$(9,636)$62,919 
Total Assets$6,428,889 $18,194 $14,634 $6,461,717 
Net Loans3,734,659 5,024 — 3,739,683 
124


($ in thousands)Year Ended December 31, 2021
Commercial/
Retail
Bank
Mortgage
Banking
Division
Holding
Company
Total
Interest income$176,153 $582 $10 $176,745 
Interest expense12,166 140 7,375 19,681 
Net interest income (loss)163,987 442 (7,365)157,064 
Provision (credit) for loan losses(1,104)— — (1,104)
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses165,091 442 (7,365)158,168 
Non-interest income28,539 8,823 111 37,473 
Non-interest expense103,430 5,361 5,768 114,559 
Income (loss) before income taxes90,200 3,904 (13,022)81,082 
Income tax (benefit) expense19,222 988 (3,295)16,915 
Net income (loss)$70,978 $2,916 $(9,727)$64,167 
Total Assets$6,015,664 $16,519 $45,231 $6,077,414 
Net Loans2,929,995 6,494 — 2,936,489 
125


NOTE WV - SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS (UNAUDITED)

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31  June 30  Sept. 30  Dec. 31 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
2017                
Total interest income $15,753  $16,464  $16,708  $17,143 
Total interest expense  1,585   1,629   1,773   1,922 
Net interest income  14,168   14,835   14,935   15,221 
Provision for loan losses  46   248   90   122 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  14,122   14,587   14,845   15,099 
Total non-interest income  3,391   3,757   3,658   3,556 
Total non-interest expense  16,095   15,070   11,888   12,390 
Income tax expense  296   908   1,901   3,851 
Net income applicable to common Stockholders $1,122  $2,366  $4,714  $2,414 
Per common share:                
Net income, basic $.12  $.26  $.52  $.23 
Net income, diluted  .12   .26   .51   .23 
Cash dividends declared  .0375   .0375   .0375   .0375 
                 
2016                
Total interest income $10,596  $10,871  $11,269  $11,868 
Total interest expense  922   1,016   1,202   1,176 
Net interest income  9,674   9,855   10,067   10,692 
Provision for loan losses  190   204   143   88 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  9,484   9,651   9,924   10,604 
Total non-interest income  2,484   2,961   3,099   2,705 
Total non-interest expense  8,395   8,921   9,416   10,132 
Income tax expense  969   1,042   1,049   870 
Net income  2,604   2,649   2,558   2,307 
Preferred dividends  85   86   86   195 
Net income applicable to common Stockholders $2,519  $2,563  $2,472  $2,112 
Per common share:                
Net income, basic $.47  $.47  $.46  $.39 
Net income, diluted  .46   .47   .45   .26 
Cash dividends declared  .0375   .0375   .0375   .0375 

100

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)March 31June 30Sept. 30Dec. 31
2023
Total interest income$80,338 $86,194 $85,681 $88,720 
Total interest expense15,412 20,164 24,977 31,055 
Net interest income$64,926 $66,030 $60,704 $57,665 
Provision for credit losses11,000 1,250 1,000 1,250 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses53,926 64,780 59,704 56,415 
Total non-interest income12,612 12,423 19,324 2,346 
Total non-interest expense45,670 46,899 47,724 44,433 
Income tax expense4,597 6,525 6,944 3,281 
Net income available to common stockholders$16,271 $23,779 $24,360 $11,047 
Per common share:
Net income, basic$0.52 $0.76 $0.78 $0.35 
Net income, diluted0.52 0.75 0.77 0.35 
Cash dividends declared0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 
2022
Total interest income$42,741 $45,847 $53,874 $57,931 
Total interest expense4,102 3,746 4,726 10,003 
Net interest income$38,639 $42,101 $49,148 $47,928 
Provision for credit losses— 600 4,300 705 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses38,639 41,501 44,848 47,223 
Total non-interest income11,157 8,664 9,022 8,118 
Total non-interest expense28,590 30,955 35,903 35,035 
Income tax expense4,377 3,457 3,924 4,012 
Net income available to common stockholders$16,829 $15,753 $14,043 $16,294 
Per common share:    
Net income, basic$0.81 $0.77 $0.61 $0.68 
Net income, diluted0.81 0.76 0.61 0.67 
Cash dividends declared0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 
2021    
Total interest income$45,187 $43,238 $44,435 $43,885 
Total interest expense5,958 5,188 4,407 4,128 
Net interest income$39,229 $38,050 $40,028 $39,757 
Provision for loan losses— — — (1,104)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses39,229 38,050 40,028 40,861 
Total non-interest income9,472 8,822 9,586 9,593 
Total non-interest expense27,264 27,452 29,053 30,790 
Income tax expense4,793 3,820 4,429 3,873 
Net income available to common stockholders$16,644 $15,600 $16,132 $15,791 
Per common share:
Net income, basic$0.79 $0.74 $0.77 $0.75 
Net income, diluted0.79 0.74 0.76 0.75 
Cash dividends declared0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 

2015                
Total interest income $9,683  $10,022  $10,080  $10,417 
Total interest expense  804   806   793   804 
Net interest income  8,879   9,216   9,287   9,613 
Provision for loan losses  150   -   250   10 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  8,729   9,216   9,037   9,603 
Total non-interest income  1,850   1,854   1,982   1,903 
Total non-interest expense  7,818   8,092   7,977   8,275 
Income tax expense  732   793   815   873 
Net income  2,029   2,185   2,227   2,358 
Preferred dividends and stock accretion  85   86   86   85 
Net income applicable to common Stockholders $1,944  $2,099  $2,141  $2,273 
Per common share:                
Net income, basic $.36  $.39  $.40  $.42 
Net income, diluted  .36   .39   .39   .42 
Cash dividends declared  .0375   .0375   .0375   .0375 

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

126


NOTE W - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements primarily to facilitate the risk management strategies of certain commercial customers. The interest rate swap agreements entered into by the Company are all entered into under what is referred to as a back-to-back interest rate swap, as such, the net positions are offsetting assets and liabilities, as well as income and expenses and risk participation. All derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial condition at their respective fair values, as components of other assets and other liabilities.
Under a back-to-back interest rate swap program, the Company enters into an interest rate swap with the customer and another offsetting swap with a counterparty. The result is two mirrored interest rate swaps, absent a credit event, which will offset in the financial statements. These swaps are not designated as hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in other assets and other liabilities. The change in fair value is recognized in the income statement as other income and fees.
Risk participation agreements are derivative financial instruments and are recorded at fair value. These derivatives are not designated as hedges and therefore, changes in fair value are recorded directly through earnings at each reporting period. Under a risk participation-out agreement, a derivative asset, the Company participates out a portion of the credit risk associated with the interest rate swap position executed with the commercial borrower, for a fee paid to the participating bank. Under a risk participation-in agreement, a derivative liability, the Company assumes, or participates in, a portion of the credit risk associated with the interest rate swap position with the commercial borrower, for a fee received from the other bank. The Company has two risk participation-in swaps and one risk participation-out swap at December 31, 2023.

The following table provides outstanding interest rate swaps at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

($ in thousands)December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Notional amount$493,290 $328,756 
Weighted average pay rate5.2 %4.6 %
Weighted average receive rate5.2 %4.3 %
Weighted average maturity in years5.396.11

The following table provides the fair value of interest rate swap contracts at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 included in other assets and other liabilities.

($ in thousands)December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Derivative AssetsDerivative LiabilitiesDerivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Interest rate swap contracts$12,170 12,175 12,825 12,825 

The Company also enters into a collateral agreement with the counterparty requiring the Company to post cash or
cash equivalent collateral to mitigate the credit risk in the transaction. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had $500 thousand of collateral posted with its counterparties, which is included in the consolidated statement of financial condition as cash and cash equivalents as "restricted cash". The Company also receives a swap spread to compensate it for the credit exposure it takes on the customer-facing portion of the transaction and this upfront cash payment from the counterparty is recorded in other income, net of any transaction execution expenses, in the consolidated statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, net swap spread income included in other income was $1.3 million and $193 thousand, respectively.

Entering into derivative contracts potentially exposes the Company to the risk of counterparties' failure to fulfill their legal obligations, including, but not limited to, potential amounts due or payable under each derivative contract. Notional principal amounts are often used to express the volume of these transactions, but the amounts potentially subject to credit risk are much smaller. The Company assesses the credit risk of its dealer counterparties by regularly monitoring publicly available credit rating information, evaluating other market indicators, and periodically reviewing detailed financials.

The Company records the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts separately within other assets and other liabilities as current accounting rules do not permit the netting of customer and counterparty fair value amounts in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
127


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s principal executive officermanagement, under the supervision of and principal financial officer have concluded, based upon theirwith the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the Company’s “disclosuredisclosure controls and procedures” (asprocedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2017, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of December 31, 2023. Disclosure controls and were effective in ensuringprocedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we filefiled or submitsubmitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company'sour management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During Based on that evaluation, the quarter ended December 31, 2017, noChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. No changes have occurred inwere made to the Company’s internal controlcontrols over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(f)Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act)Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The First Bancshares, Inc.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective “internalinternal control over financial reporting”reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Under

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management, under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, the CompanyChief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). This assessment included controls over the preparation of the schedules equivalent to the basic financial statements(COSO) in accordance with the instructions for the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act.Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this evaluation,that assessment, our management of the Company has concluded the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f),believes that, as of December 31, 2017.

101

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting can also be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. These inherent limitations, however, are known features of the financial reporting process. It is possible, therefore, to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

T. E. Lott & Company, an independent registered public accounting firm, which audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on2023, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting which is included herein.

/s/ M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr./s/ Dee Dee Lowery
CEO and PresidentExecutive VP and Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2018March 16, 2018

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Towas effective based on those criteria.

As permitted by SEC guidance, management has excluded the Boardoperations of Directors and Shareholdersthe HSBI acquisition from the scope of

The First Bancshares, Inc.

Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Opinion management’s report on Internal Controlinternal control over Financial Reporting

We have auditedfinancial reporting. HSBI was acquired during the year ended December 31, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2023, HSBI represented approximately 19.6% of total consolidated assets.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains an audit report of FORVIS, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 pursuant to the rules of the SEC. Their report appears in the section captioned “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” included in Part II. Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report.

128


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders, Board of Directors and Audit Committee
The First Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary
Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited The First Bancshares, Inc.’s (the "Company"“Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established inInternal Control ̶ Integrated FrameworkFramework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Because management's assessment and our audit were conducted to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), management's assessment and our audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting included controls over the preparation of the schedules equivalent to the basic financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established inInternal Control ̶ Integrated FrameworkFramework: (2013)issued by COSO.


We also have not examined and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management's statement referring to compliance with laws and regulations.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)(“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and for each of the yearyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, of the Company2023, and our report dated March 16, 2018,February 29, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

102


Basis for Opinion


The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

103


To

As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, the Boardscope of Directorsmanagement’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, has excluded Heritage Southeast Bancorporation, Inc. which was acquired during the year ended December 31, 2023. We have also excluded Heritage Southeast Bancorporation, Inc. from the scope of our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Heritage Southeast Bancorporation, Inc. represented approximately 22.4 percent of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023, and Shareholdersapproximately 19.6 percent of

The First Bancshares, Inc.

Page 2

Definition consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2023.


Definitions and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting


A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of reliable financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ T. E. Lott & Company
Columbus, Mississippi
March 16, 2018


/s/ FORVIS, LLP
Jackson, Mississippi
February 29, 2024
129


ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

SERP Amendments
On November 16, 2023, the Board approved amendments to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated January 1, 2020 with M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr. (the "Cole 2020 SERP Amendment") and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated January 1, 2021 with Donna T. (Dee Dee) Lowery (the "2021 Lowery SERP Amendment"). The 2020 Cole SERP Amendment and the 2021 Lowery SERP Amendment were executed on February 26, 2024. The material terms of the agreements are summarized below.
Mr. Cole's 2020 SERP, as amended. Mr. Cole's 2020 SERP, as amended, provides for a lifetime benefit equal to 50% of "compensation" (as defined in the 2020 SERP), less any amounts payable under his 2014 SERP, which will be payable in equal monthly installments upon Mr. Cole's separation from service following attainment of age 65 while in the employment of the Bank (except in the case of Mr. Cole's death, in which case the death benefit will be paid in a lump sum).
If Mr. Cole separates from service prior to age 65, other than by reason of his death or a termination for cause other than in connection with a change in control, then he will receive an annual benefit equal to the "early termination benefit" (as defined in the 2020 SERP).
If Mr. Cole separates from service following a change in control prior to age 65, then he will receive 100% of the "change in control benefit" (as defined in the 2020 SERP).
In the event of Mr. Cole's death, his beneficiary will receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of Mr. Cole's compensation multiplied by a factor of 17, less any amounts already paid under the 2021 or 2014 SERPs, plus an additional lump sum death benefit payment determined by Mr. Cole's age at death.
Ms. Lowery's 2021 SERP. Ms. Lowery's 2021 SERP, as amended, provides for a lifetime benefit equal to 50% of "compensation" (as defined in the 2021 SERP), less any amounts payable under her 2014 SERP, which will be payable in equal monthly installments upon Ms. Lowery's separation from service following attainment of age 65 while in the employment of the Bank (except in the case of Ms. Lowery's death, in which case the death will be paid in a lump sum).
If Ms. Lowery separates from service prior to age 65, other than by reason of her death or a termination for cause other than in connection with a change in control, then she will receive an annual benefit equal to the "early termination benefit" (as defined in the 2021 SERP).
If Ms. Lowery separates from service following a change in control prior to age 65, then she will receive 100% of the "change in control benefit" (as defined in the 2021 SERP).
In the event of Ms. Lowery's death, her beneficiary will receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of Ms. Lowery's compensation multiplied by a factor of 21, less any amounts already paid under the 2021 or 2014 SERPs.
On November 16, 2023, the Board also approved amendments to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated May 15, 2014 with Mr. Cole (the "2014 Cole SERP Amendment") and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated May 19, 2014 with Ms. Lowery (the "2014 Lowery SERP Amendment"), to remove the death benefit provided under each agreement. The 2014 Cole SERP Amendment and the 2014 Lowery SERP Amendment were executed on February 26, 2024.
The summary provided herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2020 Cole SERP Amendment, the 2021 Lowery SERP Amendment, the 2014 Cole SERP Amendment and the 2014 Lowery SERP Amendment, which are attached hereto as Exhibits 10.13, 10.17, 10.11 and 10.15, respectively.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements
During the quarter ended December 31, 2023, none of the Company's directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of Company securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-(c) or any "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement.
130


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER,OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this item is set forth in our definitive proxy materials regarding our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 24, 2018,23, 2024, which proxy materials will be filed with the SEC on or about April 11, 2018.

104
10, 2024.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this item is set forth in our definitive proxy materials regarding our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 24, 2018,23, 2024, which proxy materials will be filed with the SEC on or about April 11, 2018.

10, 2024.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this item is set forth in our definitive proxy materials regarding our annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 24, 2018, which proxy materials will be filed with the SEC on or about April 11, 2018.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this item is set forth in our definitive proxy materials regarding our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 24, 2018,23, 2024, which proxy materials will be filed with the SEC on or about April 11, 2018.

10, 2024.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND SERVICES

RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this item is set forth in our definitive proxy materials regarding our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 24, 2018,23, 2024, which proxy materials will be filed with the SEC on or about April 11, 2018.

105
10, 2024.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this item is set forth in our definitive proxy materials regarding our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 23, 2024, which proxy materials will be filed with the SEC on or about April 10, 2024.
131


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
1.The following consolidated financial statements of The First Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries are incorporated as part of this Report under Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
2.Consolidated balance sheets – December 31, 2017 and 2016 

Consolidated statements of income – Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

Consolidated statements of other comprehensive income – Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity– Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Consolidated statements of cash flows –Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

Notes to consolidated financial statements – December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

2.Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules:

Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules have been omitted, as the required information is either inapplicable or included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3.Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, by Item 15(b) are listed below.

(b)Exhibits:

3.Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, by Item 15(b) are listed below.
(b)Exhibits:
All other financial statements and schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(a)3. Exhibits:

Exhibits:
Exhibit
No.
Description of Exhibit
2.1
2.2Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 12, 2016, by and between The First Bancshares, Inc. and A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber and Shingle Co. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the First Bancshares’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2016).
2.3
2.42.3
2.4
3.1
2.5
2.6
132


2.7
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of The First Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2023.
3.4

3.5106

Provisions inAmendment No. 1 to the Company’s ArticlesAmended and Restated Bylaws of Incorporation and Bylaws defining the rightsThe First Bancshares, Inc. effective as of holders of the Company’s Common StockMay 7, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.13.4 to The First Bancshares’ Currentthe Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q filed on July 28, 2016 and to Exhibit 3.2 to The First Bancshares’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2016)May 11, 2020).
4.24.1
4.2
10.1
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
10.1
10.2
10.3Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2016, by and between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Company. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement No. 333-215157 on Form S-1 filed on December 16, 2016).
10.4Employment Agreement dated May 31, 2011, between The First, A National Banking Association, and M. Ray Cole, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of The First Bancshares' Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 29, 2012)
10.5Change in Control Agreement dated as of February 1, 2017 between the Company and Dee Dee Lowery (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of The First Bancshares’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017).+
10.6The First Bancshares, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to The First Bancshares’ Registration Statement No. 333-171996 on Form S-8 filed on February 1, 2011).+
10.7Amendment to 2007 Stock Incentive Plan effective May 28, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to The First Bancshares Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2016).+
10.8
10.4
10.9
133


10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.10
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.11
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.1210.19

10.20
21.1
10.21
134


10.22
10.23
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1

97.1
101.INSXBRL Instance Document

101.SCH101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

________________________
*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

+ Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

107

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

135


SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
Date: March 16, 2018February 29, 2024By:/s/ M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr.
M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer), Chairman of the Board
Date: March 16, 2018February 29, 2024By: /s//s/ Dee Dee Lowery
Dee Dee Lowery
Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr. and Donna T. (Dee Dee) Lowery, with full power to act without the other, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full and several powers of substitution and resubsititution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully as to all intents and purposes as each of the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURESCAPACITIESCAPACITIESDATE
/s/ E. Ricky GibsonDirectorDirector and Chairman of the BoardMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ Rodney D. BennettDirectorMarch 16, 2018
/s/ David W. BomboyDirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ Jonathan A. LevyDirectorFebruary 29, 2024
/s/ Charles R. LightseyDirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ Fred McMurryDirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ Thomas E. MitchellDirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ Renee MooreDirectorFebruary 29, 2024
/s/ Ted E. ParkerLead DirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ J. Douglas SeidenburgDirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
/s/ Andrew D. StetelmanDirectorDirectorMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024

/s/ Valencia M. Williamson

DirectorFebruary 29, 2024
/s/ M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr.

CEO, President, Director, and DirectorChairman ofMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
(Principalthe Board (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Donna T. (Dee Dee) LoweryExecutive VP & Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2018February 29, 2024
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

108

136