TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

2022

or


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to         .

Commission file number: 001-38282

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York

82-1340349

13-4042724

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

99 Park Avenue, New York, New York

10016

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 365-6700

(212) 659-0600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Ticker Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

MCB

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☐   NO ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES ☐   NO ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☒   NO 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ☒   NO 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of  “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”,  “smaller reporting company”, and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES    NO 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2017,2022, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $97.3$709.9 million.

As of MarchFebruary 23, 2018,2023, there were issued and outstanding 8,194,92510,961,091 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCOPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Part III).


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS AND ACRONYMS

PART I

2

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

2

3

PART I

24

Item 1

5

Item 1A

Risk Factors

25

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

39

38

Properties

39

38

Legal Proceedings

40

38

Mine Safety Disclosures

40

39

PART II

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

41

39

[Reserved]

43

40

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

45

40

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

63

56

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

65

58

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

65

58

Controls and Procedures

65

58

Other Information

65

59

Item 9C

PART III

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

���

59

PART III

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

66

59

Executive Compensation

66

60

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

66

60

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

66

60

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

66

60

PART IV

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

66

61

Item 16

67

63

SIGNATURES

64

1

GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS AND ACRONYMS

ACL

Allowance for Credit Losses

FHLB

116

Federal Home Loan Bank

AFS

Available-for-sale

FHLBNY

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

ALCO

Asset Liability Committee

FRB

Federal Reserve Bank

ALLL

Allowance for loan and lease losses

FRBNY

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

ASC

Accounting Standards Codification

FX

Foreign exchange

ASU

Accounting Standards Update

GAAP

U.S. Generally accepted accounting principles

BaaS

Banking-as-a-Service

HTM

Held-to-maturity

Bank

Metropolitan Commercial Bank

IRR

Interest rate risk

BHC Act

Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended

ISO

Incentive stock option

BSA

Bank Secrecy Act

JOBS Act

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act

C&I

Commercial and Industrial

LIBOR

London Inter-Bank Offered Rate

CARES Act

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act

LTV

Loan-to-value

CECL

Current Expected Credit Loss

MBS

Mortgage-backed securities

CFPB

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

NYSDFS

New York State Department of Financial Services

Company

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

OCC

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Coronavirus

COVID-19

OTTI

Other-than-temporary impairment

CRA

Community Reinvestment Act

PPP

Paycheck Protection Program

CRE

Commercial real estate

PRSU

Performance Restricted Share Units

CRE Guidance

Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices

ROU

Right of Use

DIF

Deposit Insurance Fund

SEC

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

EGC

Emerging Growth Company

SOFR

Secured Overnight Financing Rate

EVE

Economic value of equity

SRC

Smaller reporting company

FASB

Financial Accounting Standards Board

TDR

Troubled debt restructuring

FDIC

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

USD

U.S. Dollar

2

i

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD LOOKINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements10 K may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements reflect the Metroplitan Bank Holding Corp.’s (the “Company”) current views with respect to, among other things, future events and the Company’s financial performance. These statements are often, but not always, made throughPrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which may be identified by the use of such words or phrases such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “expect,” “attribute,“anticipate,” “consider,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “continue,” “will,“probable,“anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “goal,” “target,” “outlook,” “aim,” “would,” “annualized” and “outlook,”“potential” or the negative version of those wordsthese terms or other comparable words or phrasesterminology. Examples of a future or forward-looking nature. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Metropolitan Commercial Bank (the “Bank”), and the Company’s strategies, plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, and other statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company’s industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond the Company’s control. Accordingly, the Company cautions that any such forward-lookingfacts. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions, estimatesuncertainties and uncertaintiesother factors (many of which are beyond the Company’s control) that are difficult to predict. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made,could cause actual results may prove to bediffer materially different from thefuture results expressed or implied by thesuch forward-looking statements.

Factors that may cause actual results to differ from those results expressed or implied include but are not limited to, those factors listed in this report under the headingItem 1A. “Risk Factors” and the following: the inability of customers to repay their obligations; developments in the financial services industry and U.S. and global credit markets; downward changes in the direction of the economy nationally; environmental liability; failure to implement new technologies in the Company’s operations; changes in its liquidity; changes in its funding sources; failure of its controls and procedures; and its success in managing risks involved in the foregoing. Although management has taken certain steps to mitigate any negative effect of the aforementioned items, significant unfavorable changes could severely impact the assumptions used and have an adverse effect on profitability. Some of these risks and other aspects of the Company’s business and operations are alsoas described in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report. In addition, these factors include but are not limited to:

the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and results of operation;
an unexpected deterioration in our loan or securities portfolios;
unexpected increases in our expenses;
different than anticipated growth and our ability to manage our growth;
increases in competitive pressures among financial institutions or from non-financial institutions, which may result in unanticipated changes in our loan or deposit rates;
changes in the interest rate environment, which may reduce interest margins or affect the value of the Company’s investments;
the impact of interest rate reform that applies to transactions that reference LIBOR;
changes in deposit flows or loan demand, which may adversely affect the Company’s business;
changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines may cause the Company’s financial condition or results of operation to be reported or perceived differently;
general economic conditions, including unemployment rates, either nationally or locally in some or all of the areas in which the Company does business, or conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry being less favorable than currently anticipated;
potential return to recessionary conditions, including the related effects on our borrowers and on our financial condition and results of operations;
unanticipated adverse changes in our customers’ economic conditions;
inflation, which may lead to higher operating costs;
declines in real estate values in the Company’s market area, which may adversely affect its loan production;
legislative, tax or regulatory changes or actions, which may adversely affect the Company’s business;
an unexpected adverse financial, regulatory, legal or bankruptcy event experienced by our fintech partners;

3

technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive to implement than anticipated;
system failures or cyber-security breaches of our information technology infrastructure or those of the Company’s third-party service providers or those of our fintech partners for which we provide global payments infrastructure;
the failure to maintain current technologies and to successfully implement future information technology enhancements;
the effects of any developments, changes or actions relating to any litigation or regulatory proceedings brought against us or any of our subsidiaries;
the costs, including the possible incurrence of fines, penalties, or other negative effects (including reputational harm) of any adverse judicial, administrative, or arbitral rulings or proceedings, regulatory enforcement actions, or other legal actions to which we or any of our subsidiaries are a party, and which may adversely affect our results;
an unanticipated loss of key personnel or existing customers;
unanticipated increases in FDIC costs;
the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events;
the ability to attract or retain key employees;
successful implementation or consummation of new business initiatives, which may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated;
the timely and efficient development of new products and services offered by the Company or its strategic partners, as well as risks (including reputational and litigation) attendant thereto, and the perceived overall value and acceptance of these products and services by customers;
changes in consumer spending, borrower or savings habits;
the risks associated with adverse changes to credit quality, including changes in the level of loan delinquencies, non-performing assets and charge-offs and changes in the estimates of the adequacy of the ALLL;
difficulties associated with achieving or predicting expected future financial results; and
the potential impact on the Company’s operations and customers resulting from natural or man-made disasters, wars, acts of terrorism, cyber-attacks and pandemics.

The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effects of its plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. As such, forward-looking statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions made or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect conditions only as of the date of this report.filing. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this document. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the resultresults of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements, except as required by the law.

4

1

TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

PART I

Item 1.  Business

The Company is a bank holding company headquartered in New York, New York and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act (“BHC Act”).Act. Through its wholly owned bank subsidiary, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, (the “Bank” or “Metropolitan”), a New York state charteredstate-chartered bank, the Company provides a broad range of business, commercial and retail banking products and services to small businesses, middle-market enterprises, public entities and affluent individuals primarily in the New York metropolitan area. The Company’s founding members, including theits Chief Executive Officer, Mark DeFazio, recognized a need in the New York metropolitan area for a solutions oriented,solutions-oriented, relationship bank focused on middle market companies and real estate entrepreneurs who require loans of  $2 – 25 million, which is a sizewhose financial needs are often overlooked or deprioritized by larger financial institutions. The Bank was established in 1999 with the goal of helping these under-served clients build and sustain wealth. Its motto, “The Entrepreneurial Bank,” is a reflection of the Bank’s aspiration to develop a middle-market bank that shares the same entrepreneurial spirit ofas its clients. By combining the high-touchhigh-tech service and relationship-based focus of a community bank with thean extensive suite of financial products and services, offered by its largest competitors, Metropolitanthe Company is well-positioned to continue to capitalize on the significant growth opportunities available in the New York metropolitan area. See the “Glossary of Common Terms and Acronyms” for the definition of certain terms and acronyms used throughout this Form 10-K.

In addition to traditional commercial banking products, the Company offers corporate cash management and retail banking services, and servesis an established leader in BaaS through its Global Payments Group (“global payments business”). The Global Payments Group provides global payments infrastructure to its fintech partners, which includes serving as an issuing bank for third-party debit card programs nationwide.nationwide and providing other financial infrastructure, including cash settlement and custodian deposit services. The BankCompany has developed various low cost deposit generatinggathering strategies, which have made itgenerate the funding necessary to operate without a core funded institution. The Bank expects these strategies to continue to generate low cost funding, which will allow it to be alarge branch light franchise.

network. These activities, together with fivesix strategically located banking centers, generate a stable source of low cost core deposits and a diverse loan portfolio with attractive risk-adjusted yields. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company’s assets, loans, deposits, and stockholders’ equity totaled $1.76$6.3 billion, $1.42$4.8 billion, $1.40$5.3 billion and $236.88$575.9 million, respectively.

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to the supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”).System. The Company is required to file with the FRB reports and other information regarding its business operations and the business operations of its subsidiaries. As a state-chartered bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System,FRB, the Bank is subject to FDIC regulations as well as primary supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYSDFS”)NYSDFS as theits state regulator and by the FRB as its primary federal regulator.

Available Information
The Bank’s website address

Amendments to the SEC’s Smaller Reporting Company Definition

In 2018, the SEC adopted amendments to its regulations that raised the thresholds by which entities would be defined as an SRC, which permits reduced disclosure and later filing deadlines. Under the definition of an SRC, a company with less than $250 million of public float or less than $100 million in annual revenues and either no public float or a public float that is www.metropolitanbankny.com. less than $700 million will be eligible to provide reduced disclosures. A reporting company will determine whether it qualifies as an SRC annually as of the last business day of its second fiscal quarter. A company must reflect its SRC status in its Form 10-Q for the first fiscal quarter of the next year.

The Company makes available freequalified as an SRC for the 2021 fiscal year due to having a public float of charge throughless than $250 million as of June 30, 2020 and elected to take advantage of certain exemptions allowed as an SRC. However, the Company exceeded the $250 million public float threshold as of June 30, 2021 and accordingly no longer qualified as an SRC beginning with its website, by clickingForm 10-Q for the Investor Relations tabquarter ending March 31, 2022. However, until December 31, 2022, the Company still qualified as an EGC, which continued to allow certain reduced disclosure, accounting and selecting “Annual Reports &corporate governance requirements. See “Business – Emerging Growth Company Status.

5

Available Information

The SEC Filings” itsmaintains an internet site, www.sec.gov, that contains the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and anyamendments thereto, and other reports electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You may read and copy any materials theSEC. The Company filesmakes these documents filed with the SEC atavailable free of charge through the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can get informationCompany’s website, www.mcbankny.com, by clicking the Investor Relations tab and selecting “SEC Filings” under the “Filings & Financials” tab. Information included on the operationCompany’s website is not part of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Market Area

The Bank’sCompany’s primary market consists ofincludes the New York metrometropolitan area, specifically Manhattan and the outer boroughs.boroughs, and Nassau County, New York. This market is well-diversified and represents the largesta large market for middle market businesses, in the country (defined as businesses with annual revenue of $5 million to $200 million). Middle-market businesses have changedThe Company’s market area has a diversified economy typical of most urban population centers, with the majority of employment provided by services, wholesale/retail trade, finance/insurance/real estate, technology companies and construction. A relationship-led strategy has provided the Company with select opportunities in type, but not in substance, in recent decades followingother U.S. markets, with a commercial trend out of manufacturing and into services. Unlike other Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”), this has been toparticular focus on South Florida. In addition, through its Global Payments Group, the advantage ofCompany issues prepaid cards for nationwide card programs managed by third-party program managers. Further, the middle-market business community in the New York metropolitan area, which has continued to grow at a better than average pace relative to other metropolitan regions in the United States.

Company administers global payment settlements for its fintech partners globally.

The BankCompany operates fivesix banking centers strategically located within close proximity to target clients. There are threefour banking centers in midtown Manhattan, one banking center in Brooklyn, New York, and one banking center in Great Neck, Long Island. The 99 Park Avenue banking center, adjacent to the

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Company headquarters, is located at the center of one of the largest markets for bank deposits in the New York MSAMetropolitan Statistical Area due to the abundance of corporate and high net worth clients. The Manhattan banking centers are centrally located in the heart of neighborhoods strongly identifiednotably associated with specific business sectors, with which the BankCompany has a strong existing relationship.relationships. The Brooklyn banking center is on an active commercial strip in the active Boro Park neighborhood, which is home to many smallsmall- and medium-sized businesses, and where several important existing lending clients live and work. The newest banking center in Great Neck, Long Island represents a natural extension of the Bank’sCompany’s efforts to establish a physical footprint in areas where many of its existing and prospective commercial clients are located, and also serves as a central hub for philanthropic and community events.
The Company also has a loan production office in Miami, Florida, an administrative office in Lakewood, New Jersey, and a property in Louisville, Kentucky that is utilized as office space for our Global Payments Group.  

Competitors

The bank and non-bank financial services industriesindustry in the Bank’sCompany’s markets and surrounding areas is highly competitive. ItThe Company competes with a wide range of regional and national banks located in its market areas as well as non-bank commercial finance companies on a nationwide basis. The BankCompany faces competition in both lending and attracting funds as well as merchant processing services from commercial banks, savings associations, credit unions, consumer finance companies, pension trusts, mutual funds, insurance companies, mortgage bankers and brokers, brokerage and investment banking firms, non-bank lenders, government agencies and certain other non-financial institutions. Many of these competitors have higher lending limits and more assets, capital and lending limits, and resources than the Bank,Company, and may be able to conduct more intensive and broader-based promotional efforts to reach both commercial and individual customers. Competition for deposit products can depend heavily on pricing because of the ease with which customers can transfer deposits from one institution to another.

The Bank’s primary market areas are New York (Manhattan) and Nassau Counties, New York. The Bank’s market area has a diversified economy typical of most urban population centers, with the majority of employment provided by services, wholesale/retail trade, finance/insurance/real estate (“FIRE”) and construction. Services account for the largest employment sector across the two primary market area counties, while wholesale/retail trade accounts for the second largest employment sector in Nassau and New York Counties. New York City is one of the premier financial centers in the world, and thus FIRE is the third largest employment sector in New York County.

Accessibility, tailored product offerings, disciplined underwriting and differentiatedspeed of execution create a unique opportunity forenable the BankCompany to distinguish itself in the market of its target clients, which the BankCompany views as under-served by today’s global financial services industry. Establishing banking centers in close proximity to a “critical mass” of its clients has advanced the Company’s ability to retain and grow core deposits, provided opportunities to deepen client relationships, and enhance franchise value. As a result, each

6

Business Strategy

The Bank’sCompany’s strategy is to continue to build a relationship-oriented commercial bank throughby organically growing its existing client relationships and developing new long-term clients. ItThe Company focuses on New York metropolitan area middle-market businesses with annual revenuerevenues of $200 million or less and New York metropolitan area real estate entrepreneurs with a net worth of $5$50 million or more. The Bank looks to originateCompany originates and service Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”)services CRE and Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”)&I loans of generally between $2$3 million and $25$30 million, which it believes is generally an under-served segment of the market. Management believes that the Company is well positioned in a market area offering significant growth opportunities. As it grows, the Bank plansCompany will attempt to continue its success in convertingto convert many of its lending clients into full retail relationships.

The Bank’s top 100 clients have an average net worth of nearly $150 million and average liquidity of nearly $14 million, which it believes represents a meaningful opportunity to deepen its client relationships.

The BankCompany differentiates itself in the marketplace by offering excellent service, competitive products, innovative solutions, a relatively flat management structure giving clients access to senior management, and an ability to make lending decisions in a timely manner combined with guaranteecertainty of execution. The Bank’sCompany’s lending team has developedpossesses industry expertise that enables it to better understand its clients’ businesses and differentiates it from other banks in the market. The Bank believes it is positioned in a market area offering it significant growth opportunities, on which it can capitalize.
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On-going relationships and tailored products.

Everythingproducts

Management believes that the Bank does, from the people it recruits, to the retail locations it chooses, to the products offered, is optimized toward the goal of helping clients build and sustain wealth. The Bank believes its focus on clients inservicing all aspects of their business,the clients’ businesses, including cash management and lending solutions, as well as lending to support business growth,better positions itthe Company to be able to provide a host of services designed to meet its clients need nowclients’ current and will continue to need as they grow their businesses.future needs. The BankCompany has the flexibility and commitment to create solutions tailored to the needs of each client. For example, the BankCompany entered the healthcare lending space in 2001 and methodically built out processes, procedures, and customized infrastructure to support its clients in this vertical. The Bankindustry. Management intends to continue leveraging the quality of its team, existing relationships and its client-centered approach to further grow its tailored banking solutions, build deeper relationships and increase penetrationmarket share in its market area. Additionally, the BankCompany is always working to improveexpand its team by attracting and developing individuals that embody its spirit as “The Entrepreneurial Bank.” This ensureshelps to ensure that it continues to meet its high standard of excellence, which drives relationships and loan growth.

Strong core deposit franchise.

franchise

The strength of itsthe Company’s deposit franchise comes from theits long-standing relationships the Bank has with its clients and the strong ties it has in its market area. The Bank provides its commercial clients with convenient solutions such as remote deposit capture, business online banking and various other retail services and products. It expects to continue its success of converting lending clients into full retail clients and strategically expand its retail presence.

The Bank’s debit card issuing business is the other major source of its core deposit base. It is expected that the debit card issuing business will continueCompany has also developed a diversified funding strategy, which enables it to be less reliant on branches. Deposit funding is provided by the following deposit verticals:

1)Borrowing clients – The Company generates significant deposits from its borrowing clients. The Company provides commercial clients with convenient solutions such as remote deposit capture, business online banking and various other retail services and products. The Company will attempt to continue to convert lending clients into full retail clients and thereby continue to expand its retail presence.
2)Non-borrowing retail clients – These customers, located primarily in the New York City metropolitan area, need an efficient technology interface and the personal service of an experienced banker who can assist them in managing their day to day operations. Management believes that not every potential client of the Company is in need of extensions of credit; instead, these clients require a bank that can assist in making them more efficient and competitive.
3)Global payments business – The Company is an active issuer of debit cards for third-party debit card programs and administers domestic and international digital payments settlements for its fintech clients. It is expected that the global payments business will continue to be a diverse source of low-cost deposits as the Company continues to add new clients.
4)Corporate cash management clients – The Company provides corporate cash management services to clients who are in possession of or have discretion over large deposits such as, but not limited to, property management companies, title companies and bankruptcy trustees.

7

Cryptocurrency.
As an issuer of third-party debit cards, the Bank has been well positioned to observe and understand changes in the payment world. Approximately four years ago the Bank was referred by an existing customer to a new customer that operates as an exchange that facilitates the sale or purchase of cryptocurrency. As a result, the Bank has enhanced its comprehensive risk management process to onboard and properly manage accounts related to cryptocurrency businesses.
The Bank will continue to be very selective in choosing clients who are involved in transforming the payment industry and the sale of cryptocurrency. The Board has approved deposit limits for these types of business deposits as part of the Bank’s overall funding strategy. The Bank’s sole role with regard to cryptocurrency businesses will continue to be providing cash management services including wire transfers, ACH and foreign exchange conversion. The Bank will not, at any time, take cryptocurrency exchange rate risk or have any assets or liabilities denominated in cryptocurrencies.
Scalable operating model.
The Bank has invested significantly in its bankers, infrastructure and technology in recent years, which it believes has created a scalable platform that will support future growth. The Bank’s bankers and banking centers continue to scale in size, and it believes there is capacity to grow its business without making significant additional investments, which is expected to improve operating efficiencies over time. As a result of the investments made in previous years, the Bank’s efficiency ratio has fallen to 0.52% for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is expected to continue to improve with additional scale.

Products and Services

The BankCompany provides a comprehensive set of commercial and retail banking products and services customized to meet the needs of its clients. It also serves as an issuing bank for debit card programs nationwide andThe Company offers a broad range of lending products, primarily focused on Commercial Real Estate (CRE)CRE and Commercial & Industrial (C&I)C&I loans.

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lending Products

The Bank’sCompany’s CRE products include acquisition loans, loans to refinance or return borrower equity on income producing properties, renovation loans, loans on owner occupiedowner-occupied properties and construction loans. The BankCompany lends against a variety of asset classes, including multi-family, mixed use, retail, office, hospitality, healthcare and warehouse.

The Bank has primarily an organic loan origination platform, with only approximately 15% of CRE loans having been introduced by brokers as of December 31, 2017.

The Bank’sCompany’s C&I products consist primarily of working capital lines of credit secured by business assets, self-liquidating term loans generally made for the acquisition of equipment and other long-lived company assets, trade finance and letters of credit. The majority of C&I loans carry the personal guarantee of the principals inof the borrowing entity.

Commercial Real Estate

Non-owner occupied CRE comprises the largest component of the Bank’sCompany’s real estate loan portfolio. These mortgage loans are secured by mixed-use properties, office buildings, commercial condominium units, retail properties, hotels and warehouses. In underwriting these loans, the BankCompany generally relies on the income that is to be generated by the property as the primary means of repayment. However, the personal guarantee of the principals will frequently be required as a credit enhancement, particularly when the collateral property is in transition (i.e,(i.e., under renovation and/or in lease-up)the lease-up stage).

A Phase I Environmental Report is generally required for all new CRE loans.

Loans are generally written for terms of three to five years, thoughalthough loans with longer terms are occasionally written. Interest rates may be fixed or floating, and repayment schedules are generally based on a 25-year25- to 30-year amortization schedule; thoughschedule although interest only loans are also offered.

Factors considered in the underwriting include: the stability of the projected cash flowflows from the real estate based on operating history, tenancy, and current rental market conditions; the development and property management experience of the principals; the financial wherewithal of the principals, including an analysis of global cash flow;flows; and credit history of the principals. Maximum loan to value ratiosLTVs range from 50% to 75%, depending on the property type. The minimum debt coverage ratio is 1.20x, with higher coverage required for hospitality and special use properties.

All CRE

At December 31, 2022, $1.2 billion, or 31.5% of the Company’s real estate loan portfolio, consisted of loans with a total relationship exposure of over $1MM go to Loan Committee for approval. There are four Board membersthe healthcare industry, which were primarily made to nursing and residential care facilities. The Company has lenders who are permanent membersexperienced in lending to the healthcare industry, and particularly to skilled nursing homes. They generally originate loans to borrowers with strong cash flows who are very experienced operators that typically have over 1,000 beds under management. In addition to being secured by real estate, these loans are also generally secured by the assets of the Loan Committee;operating company, and a minimumin almost all cases the credit facilities are personally guaranteed by principals of three other Board members rotate quarterly.

A Phase I Environmental Report is required when the possibility exists that hazardous materials may have existed oncompany, who are typically high net worth individuals. The Company also originates term loans to standalone medical facilities such as radiology and dialysis centers and medical practices, which are secured by the site, orassets of the site may have been impacted by adjoining properties that are contaminated with hazardous materials.
Multifamily
company and the personal guaranties of the sponsors/owners of the practice.

Multi-family

The multifamilymulti-family loan portfolio consists of loans secured by multi tenantedmulti-tenanted residential properties primarily located in the New York City (“NYC’’) or the greater New York area. Almost all of theIn underwriting multi-family loans, in the Bank’s portfolio were originated directly through the principals, and were made primarily to finance properties that serve moderate income families in fulfillment of the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requirements.

In underwriting multifamily loans, the BankCompany employs the same underwriting standards and procedures as are employed for non-owner occupied CRE. Approval authorities

Certain of the Company’s loans are alsoassociated with rent stabilized units in the same as they areNew York City boroughs, in which the laws limit rent increases for CRE.rent stabilized multi-family properties. At December 31, 2022, the Company had $161.4 million of rent-regulated stabilized multi-family loans, which had a weighted-average debt coverage ratio of 3.34x and an average LTV of 42.24% based on the most recent appraisal, which provides a cushion against potential declines in value. If expense

8

growth exceeds revenue growth, the property may not generate sufficient cash flows to cover debt service. See “Risk Factors – Risk Relating to Lending Activities – The performance of the Company’s multi-family and mixed-use loans could be adversely impacted by regulation.”

Construction Loans

Construction lending involves additional risks when compared to permanent lending.loans. These risks include completion risk, which is impacted by unanticipated delays and/or cost overruns;overruns, and market risk, i.e., the risk that market rental rates and/or market sales prices may decline before the project is completed. Therefore, the Company only originates construction loans on a very selective basis willbasis. The types of construction loans the BankCompany may originate construction loans. In most cases these loans are both extensive renovation loans as opposed to ground up construction. However, from time to timewell as ground-up construction loans. At December 31, 2022, construction loans comprised 3.0% of the Bank will originate a ground up construction loan.Company’s loan portfolio. In all cases the owner/developer will havehas extensive

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS
construction experience, in building this type of property, sufficient equity in the transaction (maximum loan to cost of 65%) and personal recourse on the loan. The BankCompany has established conservative exposure targetslimits for construction lending as a percentage of Rick Based Capital for construction lending.
risk-based capital.

Commercial and Industrial Loans

C&I credit facilities are made to a wide range of industries. The principals of the companies have extensive experience in acquiring and operating their business. The industries include retail, wholesale, importer or exporterhealthcare with a specialty in skilled nursing facilities, auto leasing firms, wholesalers, manufacturers and importers and exporters of a wide range of products. The loans are secured by the assets of the company including accounts receivable, inventory and equipment and, in almost allmost cases, are personally guaranteed. Collateral may also include owner occupiedowner-occupied real estate. The BankCompany targets companies that have $200 Millionmillion of revenues or less.

The Bank’sCompany’s lines of credit are generally renewedreviewed on an annual basis, and its termbasis. Term loans generallytypically have terms of two to five years.years and are also reviewed on an annual basis. The credit facilities may be made with either fixed or floating rates, generally tied to the Prime Rate.

rates.

C&I loans are subject to risk factors that are unique to each business; so inbusiness. In underwriting these loans, the BankCompany seeks to gain an understanding of each client’s business in order to accurately assess the reliability of the company’s cash flow.flows. The Bank prefers to lendCompany lends to borrowers who are well capitalized, and have an established track record in their business, with predictable growth and cash flow.

Allflows.

At December 31, 2022, $219.4 million, or 24.2% of the Company’s C&I relationships with exposureloan portfolio, consisted of over $1MM goloans to the Loan Committeehealthcare industry, of the Board for approval.

which $119.2 million, or 13.2% of these loans, were made to nursing and residential care facilities. Within the C&I lending group, the BankCompany has lenders who are well experienced in lending into the healthcare industry, and particularly onto skilled nursing homes. They generally originate loans primarily in the NYC and greater NY areato borrowers with strong cash flows who are very experienced operators whothat typically have a significant number ofover 1,000 beds under management. In all cases these loans are secured by the assets of the operating company, and in almost all cases the credit facilities are personally guaranteed by principals of the company, who are typically high net worth individuals. The BankCompany also originates term loans to standalone medical facilities such as radiology and dialysis centers and medical practices, which are secured by the assets of the company and the personal guarantyguaranties of the physicians within the practice and standalone medical facilities such as radiology and dialysis centers.
Consumer Loans
The Bank originates consumer loans nationwide through a physician’s focus finance company. The loans are made only to healthcare professionals who meet specific credit criteria; and all loans are independently underwritten by the Bank. The Bank also purchases consumer loans from a regional bank that offers student loan refinancing to individuals who are no longer students, but are now employed in their chosen professions. These individuals must also meet high credit standards; and the Bank independently re-underwrites these loans as well. At year-end 2017, consumer loans comprised only 3%sponsors/owners of the Bank’s entire loan portfolio.
Retail Productpractice.

Deposit Products and Services

The Banks’s primary goal in providingCompany’s retail products and services especially to businesses, is to combine a seamless technology interface with the personal attention of a professional banker, which enables the Bank’s clients to efficiently manage their day-to-day operations. Management believes that in most cases, the factor that distinguishes the Bank from its competitors is the personalized professional service it provides its clients instead of relying solely on technology to secure a long term client relationship.

The Bank’s retail product set, which isare similar to those of mid-to-large competitive banks in its market, includes,and include, but isare not limited to:to, online banking, mobile banking, ACH, and remote deposit capture. The BankCompany has and will continue to make investments in technology that keep it ahead of its peer group and competitive with larger banks. The Bank’s largely sophisticated, high net worth client base creates a unique opportunity to service clients that are too large or complex for our peer group to service efficiently and that
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS
prefer the personalized attention not frequently guaranteed by larger banks. Based on the profile of the Bank’s client base, the technology investments the Bank has made and the growth potential the clients provide, management believes that the Bank has sustainable operating leverage.
In addition to the basic “must have” product set, the Bank sets itself apart by providing technology solutions for high volume ACH activity and third party debit card issuing services. Management believes that the Company’s competitive advantage stems from these services, which require specific technology, industry knowledge and a comprehensive risk management process.
Debit card issuing business
Debit cards and mobile services are unique and practical solutions for almost any payment need. Debit cards provide a transparent, cost-effective alternative to cash and checks for governments and businesses, as well as individuals. It democratizes electronic payments for those individuals or financial technology companies that operate outside the traditional banking system and also servesmeet the needs of customers who find it an idealits customers.

Global Payments Business

The Company administers domestic and international digital payment tool for segmenting their spending such as travelsettlements on behalf of its fintech clients and online shopping.

The Bank serves as an issuing bank for third partythird-party debit card programs nationwide. Products include General Purpose Reloadable cards (“GPR”), payroll, corporate, incentive, commission, rebates,The Company acts as the depository institution for the processing of prepaid and gift cards. It is one of the few U.S. banks that can issue debit cards for third party program managers and there is a high bar for entry in this space due to the rigorous risk management and compliance requirements.
In 2004, the Bank issued its first self-branded GPR debit card the CashZone Debit Visa Cardpayments made to help New York metro unbankedvarious businesses. The Company has designed products that enable clients to process electronic payments more easily and underbanked families have access to the alternative financial services they wanted and needed. Ever since that time the Bank has provided self-branded debit cards, as well as serving as an issuing bank for debit card programs nationwide.better manage their risk of loss. These client accounts are

Funding Strategies
Over the past several years, the Bank has developed a diversified funding strategy, which affords it the opportunity to be a core funded and branch light institution. The deposit verticals are described as follows:
1)
As a result of the Bank’s historical organic robust loan growth and high net worth client base, the Bank generates significant low cost deposits from its borrowing clients.
2)
Non-borrowing retail clients, located primarily in New York City metro area, need an efficient technology interface and the personal service of an experienced banker who can assist them in managing their day to day operations. Management believes that not every potential client of the Bank is in need extensions of credit; instead these clients require a bank that reduces or eliminates the friction in running their businesses in order to make them more efficient and competitive.
3)
The third party debit card issuing business, which commenced in 2004, has predictably provided significant zero-cost sticky deposits since inception of the business.
4)
Government or state directed funds provide further diversification.
5)
The Bank’s cash management solutions including wire transfers, ACH and foreign exchange conversion are offered to cryptocurrency related customers.
In determining the retail services it provides, the Bank’s entrepreneurial approach has required management to think outside the box of traditional product set of retail bank services.
Cryptocurrency
As an issuer of third-party debit cards, the Bank has been well positioned to observe and understand changes in the payment world. Approximately four years ago the Bank was referred by an existing customer to a new customer that operates as an exchange that facilitates the sale or purchase of cryptocurrency. As a result, the Bank has enhanced its comprehensive risk management process to onboard and properly manage accounts related to cryptocurrency businesses.

9

7

TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

The Bank will continue to be very selective in choosing clients who are involved in transforming the payment industry and the sale of cryptocurrency. The Board has approved deposit limits for these types of business deposits as part of the Bank’s overall funding strategy. The Bank’s sole role with regard to cryptocurrency businesses will continue to be providing cash management services including wire transfers, ACH and foreign exchange conversion. The Bank will not, at any time, take cryptocurrency exchange rate risk or have any assets or liabilities denominated in cryptocurrencies.
Relationship with Cryptocurrency Exchange
As part of the Bank’s diversified approach to generating deposits, it has

a relationship with a cryptocurrency exchange. This customer maintains two different types of accounts with the Bank. One account is for the customer’s general corporate purposes and the other account is for settlement activities for the benefit of its customers. The funds deposited by this customer in both accounts are denominated in U.S. dollars, not cryptocurrency.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, this customer maintained an average balance of $77.9 million in its corporate non-interest bearing account with the Bank. The Bank uses these funds in the normal course of business and realizes a net interest margin on them. During the year ended December 31, 2017, this customer maintained an average balance of approximately $111.7 million in its non-interest bearing settlement account with the Bank. As a policy, the Bank does not use funds in the settlement account for its general funding purposes. These balances are transactional in nature and are kept in overnight funds with the FRB. Income realization on these funds is limited to the overnight Fed Funds rate.
As of December 31, 2017, the Bank had total deposits of  $1.4 billion. Deposit balances related to the cryptocurrency corporate account represent roughly 6.8% of its total deposit base while those of the settlement account represent 15.9% of its total deposit base. Since the settlement account is not used for funding purposes, it does not constitute a material source of income or, the Bank believes, liquidity risk for the Bank.
As noted above, the Bank provide cash management solutions to its customers, including the cryptocurrency exchange customer. Asdemand deposits and fee income. The Company maintains a matter of long-standing policy, the Bank does not accept cryptocurrency-related wire transfers from non-U.S. entities. This policy is part of the Bank’s robust risk management program that is designed to ensure safe and sound operations in compliance with applicable laws, rules and guidance.
guidance around its global payments products.

In January 2023, the Company announced that it will fully exit the digital currency business, commonly referred to as the crypto-asset related business. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Events.”

Corporate Cash Management Deposit Accounts

The Company’s entrepreneurial approach has encouraged management to find alternatives to traditional retail bank services, such as corporate cash management deposit accounts. These accounts belong to clients who are in possession of or have discretion over large deposits such as, but not limited to, property management companies, title companies and bankruptcy trustees. The accounts provide a significant source of deposits. At December 31, 2022, deposits in these accounts amounted to $1.3 billion, which was 25.3% of total deposits. These accounts included money market accounts, demand deposit accounts and other interest-bearing transaction accounts.

Asset Quality

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, consumer loans placed in forbearance with payments past due over 90 days and still accruing, and non-accrual troubled debt restructuringsTDRs. Non-performing loans exclude TDRs that are accruing and other real estate ownedhave been performing in accordance with the terms of their restructure agreement for at least six months. Non-performing loans also exclude loan modifications that has been acquiredwere not considered TDRs under the CARES Act. See “NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in partial or full satisfaction of loan obligations or upon foreclosure. Pastthis Form 10-K.

The past due status on all loans is based on the contractual terms of the loan. It is generally the Bank’sCompany’s policy that a loan 90 days past due be placed inon non-accrual status unless factors exist that would eliminate the need to place a loan inon this status. A loan may also be designated as non-accrual at any time if payment of principal or interest in full is not expected due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. At the time loans are placed inon non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinued and previously accrued interest is reversed. All payments received on non-accrual loans are generally applied to principal. Loans are considered for return to accrual status when they become current as to principal and interest and remain current for a period of six consecutive months or when, in the opinion of management, the BankCompany expects to receive all of its original principal and interest. In the case of non-accrual loans where a portion of the loan has been charged off, the remaining balance is kept inon non-accrual status until the entire principal balance has been recovered.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Bank works closelyALLL is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover probable incurred credit losses. In determining the level to be maintained, management evaluates many factors, including current economic trends, industry experience, historical loss experience, loan concentrations, the borrower’s ability to repay and repayment performance and estimated collateral values. Loan losses are charged-off against the allowance when management believes the loan is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for non-impaired loans is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over a rolling two-year period. This actual loss experience is supplemented with borrowers that have financial difficulties to identify viable solutions that minimizeother qualitative and economic factors based on the potentialrisks present for loss. In that regard,each portfolio segment. These qualitative and economic factors include economic and business conditions, the Bank modified the terms of select loans to maximize their collectability. The modified loans are considered Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) under current accounting guidance. Modifications generally involve short-term deferrals of principal and/or interest payments, reductions of scheduled payment amounts, interest rates or principalnature and volume of the loan,portfolio, and forgivenesslending terms and volume and severity of accrued interest.past due loans.

10

8

TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

Impaired Loans

A loan is classified asconsidered to be impaired when based on current information and events, it is probable that the BankCompany will be unable to collect both theall principal and interest due underamounts according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

The majority of the Bank’s impaired loans are secured and measured for impairment based on collateral evaluations. It is the Bank’s policy to obtain updated appraisals, by independent third parties, on loans secured by real estate at the time a loan is determined to be impaired. An impairment measurement is performed based upon the most recent appraisal on file to determine the amount of any specific allocation or charge-off. In determining the amount of any specific allocation or charge-off, the Bank will make adjustments to reflect the estimated costs to sell the property. Upon receipt and review of the updated appraisal, an additional measurement is performed to determine if any adjustments are necessary to reflect the proper provisioning or charge-off. Impaired loans are reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if any changes in credit quality or market conditions would require any additional allocation or recognition of additional charge-offs. Real estate values in the Bank’s market area have been holding steady. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using (i) an appraisal, (ii) net book value of the collateral per the borrower’s financial statements, or (iii) accounts receivable aging reports, that may be adjusted based on management’s knowledge of the client and client’s business. If market conditions warrant, future appraisals are obtained for both real estate and non-real estate collateral.
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred losses on existing loans. The allowance is established based on management’s evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in the Bank’s portfolio in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), and is comprised of both specific valuation allowances and general valuation allowances.
A loan is classified as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect both the principal and interest due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are established based on management’s analysis of individually impaired loans. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, evaluations of the underlying collateral expected cash flows, delinquent or unpaid property taxes,value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

If a loan is determined to be impaired, andimpairment is placed on non-accrual status, all future payments received are applied to principal and a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net,measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existingeffective interest rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.

The general component covers non-impairedmajority of the Company’s impaired loans are secured and measured for impairment based on collateral valuations. An impairment measurement is performed based upon the most recent appraisal on file. In determining the amount of any impairment, the Company will make adjustments to reflect the estimated costs to sell the collateral. It is the Company’s policy to obtain updated appraisals by independent third parties on loans secured by real estate at the time a loan is determined to be impaired. Upon receipt and review of the updated appraisal, an additional impairment measurement is performed. Impaired loans are reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if any changes in credit quality or market conditions have occurred that would impact the impairment measurement. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using (i) an appraisal, (ii) net book value of the collateral per the borrower’s financial statements, or (iii) accounts receivable aging reports, that may be adjusted based on management’s knowledge of the client and client’s business. If market conditions warrant, updated appraisals are obtained for both real estate and non-real estate collateral.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (ASC 326), which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date be based on historical loss experience, adjustedcurrent conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2023. See “NOTE 3  SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company works closely with borrowers that have financial difficulties to identify viable solutions that minimize the potential for loss. In that regard, the Company modifies the terms of certain loans to maximize their collectability. Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered TDRs under current qualitative factors. Loans not impaired but classified as substandard and special mention use a historical loss factor on a rolling five-year historyaccounting guidance. Modifications generally involve short-term deferrals of net losses. For all other unclassified loans, the historical loss experience is determined by portfolio class and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Bank over the most recent two years. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other qualitative factors based on the risks present for each portfolio class. These qualitative factors include considerationprincipal and/or interest payments, reductions of scheduled payment amounts, interest rates or principal of the following: (1) lending policiesloan, and procedures, including underwriting standardsforgiveness of accrued interest.

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and collection, charge-offVintage Disclosures. ASU 2022-02 eliminates the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and recovery policies, (2) national and local economic and business conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments, (3) loan profiles and volume of the portfolio, (4) the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff, (5) the volume and severity of past due, classified and watch-list loans, non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other modifications (6) the quality of the Bank’s loan review system and the degree of oversight by the Bank’s Board of Directors, (7) collateral related issues: secured vs. unsecured, type, declining valuation

9

TABLEcreditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2023, see “NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF CONTENTS
environment and trend of other related factors, (8) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations, (9) the effect of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements, on the level of estimated credit losses in the Bank’s current portfolio and (10) the impact of the global economy.
The allowance for loan losses is increased through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. Loans are charged off against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectability of all or a portion of the principal is unlikely. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is performed on a periodic basis and takes into consideration such factors as the credit risk grade assignedRECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the loan, historical loan loss experience and review of specific impaired loans. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changesCompany’s consolidated financial statements in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
this Form 10-K.

Credit Risk Management

The BankCompany controls credit risk both through disciplined underwriting of each transaction, as well as active credit management processes and procedures to manage risk and minimize loss throughout the life of a transaction. ItThe Company seeks to maintain a broadly diversified loan portfolio in terms of type of customer, type of loan product, geographic area and industries in which business customers are engaged. The BankCompany has developed tailored underwriting criteria and credit management processes for each of the various loan product types it offers customers.

Credit Risk Management

11

Underwriting

Underwriting

In evaluating each potential loan relationship, the BankCompany adheres to a disciplined underwriting evaluation process including, but not limited to the following:

understanding the customer’s financial condition and ability to repay the loan;
verifying that the primary and secondary sources of repayment are adequate in relation to the amount and structure of the loan;
observing appropriate LTV guidelines for collateral-dependent loans;
identifying the customer’s level of experience in their business;
identifying macroeconomic and industry level trends;
maintaining targeted levels of diversification for the loan portfolio, both as to type of borrower and geographic location of collateral; and
ensuring that each loan is properly documented and liens are perfected on collateral.

understanding the customer’s financial condition and ability to repay the loan;

verifying that the primary and secondary sources of repayment are adequate in relation to the amount and structure of the loan;

observing appropriate loan to value guidelines for collateral secured loans;

identifying the customer’s level of experience in their business;

maintaining targeted levels of diversification for the loan portfolio, both as to type of borrower and geographic location of collateral; and

ensuring that each loan is properly documented with perfected liens on collateral.
Credit Risk Management for Lending Products
Credit Risk Management strategies for specific lending products are outlined in the “Lending Products” section above.

Loan approval authority

Approval Authority

The Bank’sCompany’s lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory, underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by its Board of Directors and management. The BankCompany has established several levels of lending authority that have been delegated by the Board of Directors to the loan committeeCredit Committee and other personnel in accordance with the Lending Authority in the Commercial Loan Policy. Authority limits are based onupon the individual loan size and the total exposure of the borrower and are conditioned on the loan conforming to the policies contained in the Commercial Loan Policy. All loans over $10 million go to the Credit Committee for approval. The Credit Committee is comprised of Board members and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. There are four Board members who are permanent members of the Credit Committee; and a minimum of two other Board members rotate quarterly. Loans of $10 million or less are approved by management subject to individual officer approval limits. However, for all group relationships with total exposure in excess of 20% of risk-based capital, approval of the Credit Committee will be required for loans of any size; except that a loan will not require Credit Committee approval if the loan request is no greater than 10% of the relationship, to a maximum of $1.0 million, whereby Lending Officers approval will be required. Any Loan Policyloan policy exceptions are fully disclosed to the approving authority.

Loans to one borrower

One Borrower

In accordance with loans-to-one-borrower regulations promulgated by the NYSDFS, the BankCompany is generally limited to lending no more than 15% of its unimpaired capital stock, surplus fund and unimpaired surplusundivided profits to any one

10

borrower or borrowing entity. This limit may be increased by an additional 10% for loans secured by readily marketable collateral having a market value, as determined by reliable and continuously available price quotations, at least equal to the amount of funds outstanding. To qualify for this additional 10% the bank must perfect a security interest in the collateral and the collateral must have a market value at all times of at least 100% of the loan amount that exceeds 15% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. At December 31, 2017, the Bank’s regulatory limit on loans-to-one borrower was $42.0 million.
Management understands the importance of concentration risk and continuously monitors the Company’s loan portfolio to ensure that portfolio risk is balanced between such factors as loan type, industry, geography, collateral, structure, maturity and risk rating, among other things. The Bank’sCompany’s Commercial Loan Policy establishes detailed concentration limits and sub limitssub-limits by loan type and geography.

Ongoing credit risk management

Credit Risk Management

In addition to the tailored underwriting process described above, the BankCompany performs ongoing risk monitoring and reviews processes for all credit exposures. Although itWhile the Company grades and classifies its loans internally, the Bank hasit also engages an independent third party professionalthird-party firm to perform regular loan reviews toand confirm loan classifications. The BankCompany strives to identify potential problem loans early in an effort to aggressively seek resolution of these situations before the loans createresult in a loss, record any necessary charge-offs promptly and maintain adequate allowance levels for probable loan losses incurred in the loan portfolio.

12

In general, whenever a particular loan or overall borrower relationship is downgraded toclassified as pass-watch, special mention or substandard based on one or more standard loan grading factors, the Bank’sCompany’s credit officers engage in active evaluation of the assetloan to determine the appropriate resolution strategy. Management regularly reviewsOn a quarterly basis, management and the Board of Directors review the status of the watch list and classified assets portfolio as well as the larger credits in the portfolio.

Investments

The Bank’sCompany’s investment objectives are primarily to provide and maintain liquidity, establish an acceptable level of interest rate risk and provide a use ofsafely invest excess funds when demand for loans is weak.less than deposit growth. Subject to these primary objectives, the BankCompany also seeks to generate a favorable return. The Board of Directors has the overall responsibility for the investment portfolio, including approval of the investment policy. The Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”)ALCO and management are responsible for implementation of the Bank’sCompany’s investment policy and monitoring its investment performance. The Board of DirectorsALCO reviews the status of its investment portfolio quarterly.

The BankCompany has legal authority to invest in various types of investment securities and liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored enterprises,agencies, mortgage-backed and municipal government securities, deposits at the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY” or “FHLB”),FHLBNY, certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions, investment grade corporate bonds and investment grade money market mutual funds. It is also required to maintain an investment in FHLBNY stock, which investment is based primarily on the level of its FHLBNY borrowings. Additionally, the BankCompany is required to maintain an investment in Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”)FRBNY stock equal to six percent of its capital and surplus.

The large majority of itsthe Company’s investments are classified as available-for-saleAFS and HTM and can be used to collateralize FHLBNY borrowings, FRB borrowings, public funds deposits or other borrowings. At December 31, 2017,2022, the investment portfolio consisted primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities residential collateralized mortgage obligations, CRA mutual fundsand, to a lesser extent, U.S. Government Agency and treasury securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. While the Bank has the authority under applicable law to enter into certain derivatives transactions, it had not entered into any derivatives transactions at December 31, 2017.

securities.

Sources of Funds

Deposits

Deposits have traditionally been the Bank’sCompany’s primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities and it does not use borrowings as a significant funding source. Itactivities. The Company generates deposits from prepaid third-party debit card solutions,programs, fintech customers, its cash management platform offered to bankruptcy trustees, property management companies and others, local businesses, individuals through client referrals and other

11

relationships and through its retail branch network. The BankCompany believes that it has a very stable core deposit base as it successfully encourages its business borrowers to maintain their operating banking relationship with it.the Company. The Bank’sCompany’s deposit strategy primarily focuses on developing borrowing and other service orientatedservice-oriented relationships with customers rather than competing with other institutions on rate. It has established deposit concentration thresholds to avoid the possibility of dependence on any single depositor base for funds.
Borrowings

In the first quarter of 2020, the Company entered into an interest rate cap derivative contract as a part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The Bankinterest rate cap had a notional amount of $300.0 million and a contractual maturity of March 1, 2025. The interest rate cap was designated as a cash flow hedge of certain deposit liabilities. In the third quarter of 2022, the Company terminated the interest rate cap and monetized the gain on the derivative. The unrecognized value of $12.7 million at termination will be released from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and recorded as a credit to Licensing fees expense through March 2025.

Borrowings

The Company maintains diverse funding sources including borrowing lines at the FHLB and the FRB discount window. Although it does not utilize borrowings as a significant funding source, it has,The Company may, from time to time, utilizedutilize advances from the FHLB to supplement its supply of investable funds.funding sources. The FHLB provides a central credit facility primarilyproducts for its member financial institutions. As a member, the BankCompany is required to own capital stock in the FHLB and is authorized to apply for advances collateralized by the security of such stock and certain of its whole firstreal estate-related mortgage loans and other assets, (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the full faith and credit of the United States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitationsLimitations on the amount of advances that

13

can be drawn are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth total assets and/or on the FHLB’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. The Company maintains a borrowing line supported by a borrower in custody collateral agreement with the FRB discount window is maintained primarily for contingency funding sources.

Personnel
window.

At December 31, 2022, the Company had $150.0 million of Federal funds purchased and $100.0 million of FHLBNY advances outstanding.

Human Capital Resources

Our employees are vital to our success and growth and are considered one of our greatest assets. The experience, knowledge, and customer service excellence they bring everyday differentiates us from our competitors. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Bank had 129Company employed 239 full-time employees, and 2 part-time employees, none of whom are represented by a collective bargaining unit,unit. This is an increase of 39 employees, or approximately 19.3%, from December 31, 2021, to support our expanding businesses and believesto support risk management in the Company’s Compliance, Credit Administration, Global Payments Operations, Technology, BSA/Anti-Money Laundering, and Risk Management, as well as in the Lending groups and other business lines.

Talent Acquisition and Retention  

The Company employs a business model that combines high-touch service, emerging technologies, and the relationship-based focus of a community bank. We offer a suite of banking and financial services to businesses and individuals that includes a growing emphasis on BaaS. Management seeks to hire, develop, promote, and retain well-qualified employees who are aligned with the Company’s business model and reflects the community.

The Company’s selection and promotion processes are without bias and include the active recruitment of minorities and women. The ratios of women and men in the Company are 47% and 53% at December 31, 2022, respectively, which is relatively unchanged from December 31, 2021. Approximately 34.4% of the employees identified as minorities at December 31, 2022, as compared to 29.7% at December 31, 2021. Within that percentage, 19.1% identify as women, as compared to 17.3% at December 31, 2021. The Company defines minorities as the following groups based on the U.S. Department of Labor Affirmative Action definition: Black or African American, Hispanic, or Latino, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and American Indians/Alaskan Natives.

To attract and retain high performing talent, the Company offers competitive, performance-based compensation and a benefits plan that includes comprehensive health care coverage, a 401(k) Plan with a Company match, life and disability insurance, commuter benefits, flexible spending accounts and health savings accounts, wellness programs, Employee Assistance Program, paid time-off and leave policies, including paid maternity/paternity leave. The Company also offers an Employee Referral Program that allows employees to earn a referral bonus by recommending candidates for open positions.

Training and Development

The training and development of employees is a priority. The Company encourages and supports the growth and development of its employees and, whenever possible, seeks to fill positions by promotion and transfer from within the organization. New job openings are posted internally with guidelines for employees to apply. This allows for career advancement, and new learning opportunities, as well as benefiting the Company by organically building its bench strength to support future growth.

The Company conducts a comprehensive New Employee Orientation for all new hires. All employees are required to complete a minimum number of hours of Compliance, BSA/Anti-Money Laundering, Enterprise Risk, Information Security/Cyber Security and technical training annually via the Company’s Learning Management System (“LMS”). Employees are also periodically assigned Professional Skills training via the LMS. The Board of Directors receives on-site training in these areas as well as through the LMS. Additional Cyber Security and Information Security updates and reminders are provided periodically.

14

The Company provides in-person training to employees on topics such as Cybersecurity, Enterprise Risk, Compliance, Technology, Strategic Planning, Goal Setting, and Employee Health Benefits. In addition, informal learning opportunities are available for employees such as attending Committee meetings to better understand the business, meeting with senior level staff and cross-training within their own department. To further their education, employees are encouraged to attend external business-related training seminars, conferences, and networking opportunities, which are paid for by the Bank.

In 2022, the Company offered on-site training on its 401(k) Plan’s features and available investments. A licensed investment advisor delivered the educational sessions in a group setting and also provided one on one sessions for those who requested individualized guidance. In addition, the Company added its common stock as an investment option to the 401(k) Plan, which was covered in the training.

Formal Management Skills training was conducted in 2022 for those employees who were newly promoted, those seeking to be promoted and those who were interested in a refresher on the guiding principles of management. The training was conducted by the American Management Association on-site at the Company headquarters over two days. The Company will continue to offer this training in 2023 to further support the development of its employees.

The Company continues to utilize the Employee Career Path Program that it implemented in 2021 to empower employees to have direct input over their career path. The employee and their manager meet one on one to define a pathway for learning and career progression. They have regular check-ins throughout the year to ensure the employee is on track to accomplish the goals identified. A template is provided to the manager by Human Resources so both the manager and employee have the opportunity to document the goals they establish together, identify strengths and areas for development, as well as document their next meeting dates. This allows for clear and consistent communication throughout the process.

In 2022, the Company conducted on-site Diversity, Equity and Inclusion training to the Board of Directors and to all Company employees. This training will be a continued focus going forward.

The Company has an Employee Engagement Committee (“EEC”) comprised of employees from various departments who organize events to support community-based functions, employee interests, educational sessions around different cultures, and volunteering for charities, among other activities. An educational lunch and learn was presented to employees in June 2022 on the meaning of Juneteenth. It was well received by the employees and the EEC plans on delivering additional similar sessions in 2023.

Environmental, Social and Governance

In the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company formalized its Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) initiative. The Company has partnered with a good working relationshipconsulting firm to assist the Company in identifying appropriate ESG priorities to focus on and implement, and to build the proper governance structure and ESG roadmap, as well as developing an ESG report. An ESG Working Group has been established under the oversight of the Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and includes representatives from across the Company. The ESG Working Group will play a critical role in identifying ESG concerns that are material to the Company’s strategy.

Safety, Health and Welfare

The safety, health and wellness of our employees is a top priority. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company continued to responsibly serve the needs of its customers while prioritizing the health and safety of employees.  

The Company created a COVID-19 Committee that was and continues to be responsible for the administration of the pandemic response for the Company. The Committee identified the potential threat of COVID-19 in February 2020 and activated its Pandemic Plan in March 2020. The Pandemic Plan incorporates developing guidance from the regulatory and health communities and the Company has continued to adapt protocols to protect the health and well-being of employees while minimizing interruption to its business. The Company continues to monitor current law and guidance on COVID-19, and the Human Resources Department works closely with its employees.the employees to assist and provide accurate information in this fluid and changing environment.

Subsidiaries

15

Subsidiaries

Metropolitan Commercial Bank is the sole subsidiary of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and there are no significant subsidiaries of Metropolitan Commercial Bank.

Legal Proceedings
The Bank is subject to certain pending and threatened legal actions that arise out of the normal course of business. Management, following consultation with legal counsel, does not expect the ultimate disposition of any or a combination of these matters to have a material adverse effect the Bank. However, given the nature, scope and complexity of the extensive legal and regulatory landscape applicable to its business (including laws and regulations governing consumer protection, fair lending, fair labor, privacy, information security and anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws), the Bank, like all banking organizations, is subject to heightened legal and regulatory compliance and litigation risk.
Properties
The Bank believes that current facilities are adequate to meet its present and foreseeable needs, subject to possible future expansion.

Federal, State and Local Taxation

The following is a general description of material tax matters and does not purport to be a comprehensive review of the tax rules applicable to the Company.

For federal income tax purposes, the Company files a consolidated income tax return on a December 31stcalendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting. The companyCompany is subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations. For its 20172022 taxable year, the bankCompany is subject to a maximum Federal income tax rate of 35%.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system including a federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%. As a result of the Tax Act, the company recorded additional tax expense
12

of approximately $1.6m for the year ended December 31, 2017 due to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to this reduction in the corporate rate.
State and Local Taxation

The Company is subject to California, Connecticut, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York State, (“NYS”) and New York City, (“NYC”)and Tennessee income taxes on a consolidated basis.

REGULATION
The Bank is subject to Alabama, Florida, and Missouri income taxes on a separate company basis.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law on August 16, 2022. The Act includes provisions that extend the expanded Affordable Care Act health plan premium assistance program through 2025, impose an excise tax on stock buybacks, increase funding for IRS tax enforcement, expand energy incentives, and impose a corporate minimum tax. See “Risk Factors – Risk Relating to Legislative and regulatory actions may increase the Company’s costs and impact its business, governance structure, financial condition or results of operations.”

Regulation

General

The Bank is a commercial bank organized under the laws of the Statestate of New York. It is a member of the Federal Reserve System and its deposits are insured under the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”)DIF of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)FDIC up to applicable legal limits. The lending, investment, deposit-taking, and other business authority of the BankCompany is governed primarily by state and federal law and regulations and the BankCompany is prohibited from engaging in any operations not authorized by such laws and regulations. The BankCompany is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by, and the enforcement authority of, the NYSDFS and FRB, and to a lesser extent by the FDIC, as its deposit insurer. The BankCompany is also subject to federal financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”),CFPB, though, because it has less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, the FRB and NYSDFS are responsible for examining and supervising the Bank’sCompany’s compliance with these laws. The regulatory structure establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a state member bank may engage and is primarily intended for the protection of depositors, customers and the DIF. The regulatory structure gives the regulatory agencies extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes.

The Company is a bank holding company, due to its control of the Bank, and is therefore subject to the requirements of the BHCA, and regulation and supervision by the FRB. The Company files reports with and is subject to periodic examination by the FRB.

Any change in the applicable laws and regulations whether by the NYSDFS, FRB, the FDIC, or the CFPB through legislation, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and the Bank and their operations and the Company’s stockholders.

The

On May 24, 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Economic Growth Act”) was enacted to modify or remove certain financial reform rules and regulations, including some of those implemented under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) made extensive changes in. While the regulationEconomic Growth Act maintains most of insured depository institutions. Among other things,the regulatory structure established by the Dodd-Frank Act, (i) created a new CFPB as an independent bureau to assume responsibility for the implementationit amends certain aspects of the federal financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations, a function previously assigned to prudential regulators; (althoughregulatory framework for small depository institutions with assets of less than $10 billion in assets, such asbillion.

16

In addition, the Bank, continue to be examinedEconomic Growth Act includes regulatory relief for compliance with consumer protectioncommunity banks regarding regulatory examination cycles, call reports, the Volcker Rule, mortgage disclosures and fair lending laws and regulations by, and be subject to the primary enforcement authority of their primary federal bank regulator rather than the CFPB); (ii) directed changes in the way that institutions are assessed for deposit insurance; (iii) mandated the revision of regulatory capital requirements; (iv) codified the FRB’s long-standing policy that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial and managerial strength for its subsidiary banks; (v) required regulations requiring originators of certain securitized loans to retain a percentage of the risk for the transferred loans; (vi) stipulated regulatory rate-settingweights for certain debit card interchange fees; (vii) repealed restrictions on the payment of interest on commercial demand deposits; (viii) enacted the so-called Volcker Rule, which generally prohibits banking organizations from engaging in proprietary trading and from investing in, sponsoring or having certain relationships with hedge funds and (ix) contained a number of reforms related to mortgage originations.

While most of the changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act that impact the Company have been implemented or are expected to follow a known trajectory, new changes under the Trump administration, including their nature, timing and impact, cannot yet be determined with any degree of certainty.
13

high-risk CRE loans.

What follows is a summary of some of the laws and regulations applicable to the Bank and the Company. The summary is not intended to be exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual laws and regulations.

The

Regulations of the Bank Regulations

Loans and Investments

State commercial banks have authority to originate and purchase any type of loan, including commercial, commercial real estate,CRE, residential mortgages or consumer loans. Aggregate loans by a state commercial bank to any single borrower or group of related borrowers are generally limited to 15% of the Bank’sa bank’s capital stock, surplus fund and surplus,undivided profits, plus an additional 10% if secured by specified readily marketable collateral.

Federal and state law and regulations limit the Bank’sa bank’s investment authority. Generally, a state member bank is prohibited from investing in corporate equity securities for its own account other than the equity securities of companies through which the bank conducts its business. Under federal and state regulations, a New York state member bank may invest in investment securities for its own account up to specified limits depending upon the type of security. “Investment securities” are generally defined as marketable obligations that are investment grade and not predominantly speculative in nature. The NYSDFS classifies investment securities into five different types and, depending on its type, a state commercial bank may have the authority to deal in and underwrite the security. The NYSDFS has also permitted New York state member banks to purchase certain non-investment securities that can be reclassified and underwritten as loans.

Lending Standards and Guidance

The federal banking agencies adopted uniform regulations prescribing standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens or interests in real estate or made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate. Under these regulations, all insured depository institutions, such as the Bank, must adopt and maintain written policies establishing appropriate limits and standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens or interests in real estate or are made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate. These policies must establish loan portfolio diversification standards, prudent underwriting standards (including loan-to-valueLTV limits) that are clear and measurable, loan administration procedures, and documentation, approval and reporting requirements. The real estate lending policies must reflect consideration of the federal bank regulators’ Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies that have been adopted.

The FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”)OCC and the FRB have also jointly issued the “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “CRE Guidance”).CRE Guidance. The CRE Guidance, which addresses land development, construction, and certain multi-family loans, as well as commercial real estateCRE loans, does not establish specific lending limits but rather reinforces and enhances these agencies’ existing regulations and guidelines for such lending and portfolio management. Specifically, the CRE Guidance provides that a bank has a concentration in CRE lending if  (1) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% or more of total risk-based capital; or (2) total reported loans secured by multi-family properties, non-farm non-residential properties (excluding those that are owner-occupied), and loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 300% or more of total risk-based capital and the bank’s commercial real estateCRE loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices that address key elements, including board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estateCRE lending.

Federal Deposit Insurance

Deposit accounts at the Bank are insured up to applicable legal limits by the FDIC’s DIF. Effective July 22, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act permanently raised the deposit insurance available on all deposit accounts to $250,000.

17

14

Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured depository institutions were assigned a risk category based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors. An institution’s rate depended upon the category to which it is assigned, and certain adjustments specified by FDIC regulations. Institutions deemed less risky pay lower FDIC assessments. The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to revise its procedures to base its assessments upon each insured depository institution’s total assets less tangible equity instead of deposits.

The FDIC finalized a rule, effective April 1, 2011, that set the FDIC assessment range at 2.5 to 45 basis points of total assets less tangible equity. Effective July 1, 2016, the FDIC adopted changes that eliminated the risk categories and base assessments for most banks on financial measures and supervisory ratings derived from statistical modeling estimating the probability of failure over three years. In conjunction with the DIF reserve ratio achieving 1.5%, the assessment range (inclusive of possible adjustments) was also reduced for small institutions to a range of 1.5 basis points to 30 basis points of total assets less tangible equity.

The FDIC adopted a final rule in 2022, applicable to all insured depository institutions, to increase initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by two basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC also concurrently maintained the DIF reserve ratio at 2.0% for 2023. The increase in assessment rate schedules is intended to increase the likelihood that the reserve ratio reaches the statutory minimum of 1.35% by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2028. 

The FDIC may adjust its assessment scale uniformly, except that no adjustment can deviate more than two basis points from the base scale without notice and comment. No insured depository institution may pay a dividend if in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.

The FDIC may terminate deposit insurance upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The BankCompany does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of the Bank’sCompany’s deposit insurance.

In addition to the FDIC assessments, the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) is authorized to impose and collect, through the FDIC as collection agent, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the now defunct Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2018 and 2019.

Capitalization

The FRB regulations require state member banks, such as the Bank, to meet several minimum capital standards: a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio, a total capital to risk-based assets and a Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio. The existing capital requirements were effective January 1, 2015 and are the result of a final rule implementing regulatory amendments based on recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.

The capital standards require the maintenance of a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio and total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 4.5%, 6% and 8%, respectively, and a leverage ratio of at least 4% Tier 1 capital. Common equity Tier 1 capital consists primarily of common stockholders’ equity and related surplus, plus retained earnings, less any amounts of goodwill, other intangible assets, and other items required to be deducted. Tier 1 capital consists primarily of common equity Tier 1 and Additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital generally includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital primarily includes capital instruments and related surplus meeting specified requirements and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Institutions that have not exercised the AOCI opt-out have AOCI incorporated into common equity Tier 1 capital (including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale-securities). The Bank exercised the opt-out election regarding the treatment of AOCI.assets. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.

In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, a bank’s assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets (e.g., recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests), are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on perceived

15

risks inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one-to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans or are on non-accrual status and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified factors.

In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement is currently at 1.875% of risk-weighted assets and will be fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. TheCompany’s minimum required capital conservation buffer was at 1.25%2.5% of

18

risk-weighted assets at December 31, 2017.

2022. See Part II, Item 7., “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Regulation” for a summary of the Company’s capital ratios.

As a result of the Economic Growth Act, banking regulatory agencies adopted a revised definition of “well capitalized” for eligible financial institutions and holding companies with assets of less than $10 billion (a “Qualifying Community Bank”). The new rule establishes a community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) equal to the tangible equity capital divided by the average total consolidated assets. Regulators have established the CBLR to be set at 8.5% through calendar year 2021 and 9% thereafter. The CARES Act, signed into law in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, temporarily reduced the CBLR to 8%. The Company did not elect to be governed by the CBLR framework and at December 31, 2022, the Company’s capital exceeded all applicable requirements.

Safety and Soundness Standards

Each federal banking agency, including the FRB, has adopted guidelines establishing general standards relating to, among other things, internal controls, information and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, compensation, fees and benefits and information security standards. In general, the guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired, and require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director, or principal stockholder. The FDIC also has issued guidance on risks banks may face from third partythird-party relationships (e.g., relationships under which the third partythird-party provides services to the bank). The guidance generally requires the BankCompany to perform adequate due diligence on the third party,third-party, appropriately document the relationship, and perform adequate oversight and auditing, in order to the limit the risks to the Bank.

Company.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action

Federal law requires that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the statute establishes five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.

State member banks that have insufficient capital are subject to certain mandatory and discretionary supervisory measures. For example, a bank that is “undercapitalized” (i.e., fails to comply with any regulatory capital requirement) is subject to growth, capital distribution (including dividend) and other limitations, and is required to submit a capital restoration plan; a holding company that controls such a bank is required to guarantee that the bank complies with the restoration plan. If an undercapitalized institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.” A “significantly undercapitalized” bank is subject to additional restrictions. State member banks deemed by the FRB to be “critically undercapitalized” also may not make any payment of principal or interest on certain subordinated debt, extend credit for a highly leveraged transaction, or enter into any material transactions outside the ordinary course of business after 60 days of obtaining such status, and are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after obtaining such status.

The final rule that increased regulatory capital standards also adjusted the prompt corrective action tiers as of January 1, 2015 to conform to the new capital standards. The various categories now incorporate the newly adopted common equity Tier 1 capital requirement, an increase in the Tier 1 to risk-based assets requirement and other changes.

Under the revised prompt corrective action requirements, insured depository institutions are required to meet the following in order to qualify as “well capitalized:” (1) a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5% (new standard); (2) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% (increased from 6%); (3) a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% (unchanged) and (4) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% (unchanged).

16

The Bank was well capitalized at December 31, 2022.

Dividends

Under federal and state law and applicable regulations, a state member bank may generally declare a dividend, without approval from the NYSDFS or FRB, in an amount equal to its year-to-date net income plus the prior two years’ net income that is still available for dividend. Dividends exceeding those amounts require application to and approval by the NYSDFS

19

or FRB. To pay a cash dividend, a state member bank must also maintain an adequate capital conservation buffer under the new capital rules discussed above.

Incentive Compensation Guidance

The FRB, OCC, FDIC and other federal banking agencies have issued comprehensive guidance intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations, including state member banks and bank holding companies, do not undermine the safety and soundness of those organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The incentive compensation guidance sets expectations for banking organizations concerning their incentive compensation arrangements and related risk-management, control and governance processes. In addition, under the incentive compensation guidance, a banking organization’s federal supervisor, which for the Bank and the Company is the FRB, may initiate enforcement action if the organization’s incentive compensation arrangements pose a risk to the safety and soundness of the organization. Further, provisions of the Basel III regime described above limit discretionary bonus payments to bank and bank holding company executives if the institution’s regulatory capital ratios fail to exceed certain thresholds. The scope and content of the banking regulators’ policies on incentive compensation are likely to continue evolving.

Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders

Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act govern transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliates, which includes the Company. The FRB has adopted Regulation W, which implements and interprets Sections 23A and 23B, in part by codifying prior FRB interpretations.

An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank. A subsidiary of a bank that is not also a depository institution or a “financial subsidiary” under federal law is not treated as an affiliate of the bank for the purposes of Sections 23A and 23B; however, the FRB has the discretion to treat subsidiaries of a bank as affiliates on a case-by-case basis. Section 23A limits the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus. There is an aggregate limit of 20% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus for such transactions with all affiliates. The term “covered transaction” includes, among other things, the making of a loan to an affiliate, a purchase of assets from an affiliate, the issuance of a guarantee on behalf of an affiliate and the acceptance of securities of an affiliate as collateral for a loan. All such transactions are required to be on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices and no transaction may involve the acquisition of any “low quality asset” from an affiliate unless certain conditions are satisfied. Certain covered transactions, such as loans to or guarantees on behalf of an affiliate, must be secured by collateral in amounts ranging from 100 to 130 percent of the loan amount, depending upon the type of collateral. In addition, Section 23B requires that any covered transaction (and specified other transactions) between a bank and an affiliate must be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the bank, as those that would be provided to a non-affiliate.

A bank’s loans to its executive officers, directors, any owner of more than 10% of its stock (each, an “insider”) and certain entities affiliated with any such person (an insider’s “related interest”) are subject to the conditions and limitations imposed by Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and the FRB’s Regulation O. The aggregate amount of a bank’s loans to any insider and the insider’s related interests may not exceed the loans-to-one-borrower limit applicable to state member banks. Aggregate loans by a bank to its insiders and insiders’ related interests may not exceed 15% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus plus an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus in the case of loans that are fully secured by readily marketable collateral, or when the aggregate amount on all of the extensions of credit outstanding to all of these persons would exceed the bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. With certain exceptions, such as education loans and certain residential mortgages, a bank’s loans to its executive officers may not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 2.5% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and

17

unimpaired surplus, but in no event more than $100,000. Regulation O also requires that any loan to an insider or a related interest of an insider be approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank, with any interested director not participating in the voting, if the loan, when aggregated with any existing loans to that insider or the insider’s related interests, would exceed the higher of $25,000 or 5% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Generally, such loans must be made on substantially the same terms as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are no less stringent than, those that are prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and must not involve more than a normal risk of repayment. An exception is

20

made for extensions of credit made pursuant to a benefit or compensation plan of a bank that is widely available to employees of the bank and that does not give any preference to insiders of the bank over other employees of the bank.

Enforcement

The NYSDFS and the FRB have extensive enforcement authority over state member banks to correct unsafe or unsound practices and violations of law or regulation. Such authority includes the issuance of cease and desist orders, assessment of civil money penalties and removal of officers and directors. The FRB may also appoint a conservator or receiver for a state member bank under specified circumstances, such as where (i) the bank’s assets are less than its obligations to creditors, (ii) the bank is likely to be unable to pay its obligations or meet depositors’ demands in the normal course of business, or (iii) a substantial dissipation of bank assets or earnings has occurred due to a violation of law ofor regulation or unsafe or unsound practices. Separately, the Superintendent of the NYSDFS also has the authority to appoint a receiver or liquidator of any state-chartered bank under specified circumstances, including where (i) the bank is conducting its business in an unauthorized or unsafe manner, (ii) the bank has suspended payment of its obligations, or (iii) the bank cannot with safety and expediency continue to do business.

Federal Reserve System
Under FRB regulations, the Bank is required to maintain reserves at the FRB against its transaction accounts, including checking and Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts. The regulations currently require that banks maintain average daily reserves of 3% on aggregate transaction accounts over $16.0 million and 10% against that portion of total transaction accounts in excess of  $122.3 million. The first $16.0 million of otherwise reservable balances are exempted from the reserve requirements. The Bank is in compliance with these requirements. The requirements are adjusted annually by the FRB. The FRB began paying interest on reserves in 2008, currently at 0.50%.

Examinations and Assessments

The BankCompany is required to file periodic reports with and is subject to periodic examination by the NYSDFS and FRB. Federal and state regulations generally require periodic on-site examinations for all depository institutions. The BankCompany is required to pay an annual assessment to the NYSDFS and FRB to fund the agencies’ operations.

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws

Federal Regulation

Under the CRA, the BankCompany has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including lowlow- and moderate incomemoderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA requires the FRB to assess itsthe Company’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take that record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by the Bank.Company. For example, the regulations specify that a bank’s CRA performance will be considered in its expansion (e.g., branching or merger) proposals and may be the basis for approving, denying or conditioning the approval of an application. As of the date ofThe Company is awaiting its most recent CRA rating for the examination conducted in 2022. The latest FRB evaluation,CRA rating received by the BankCompany was rated “Needs Improvement” with respect to its CRA compliance.

18

“Satisfactory” for the examination conducted in 2020.

New York State Regulation

The BankCompany is also subject to provisions of the New York State Banking Law that impose continuing and affirmative obligations upon a banking institution organized in New York State to serve the credit needs of its local community. Such obligations are substantially similar to those imposed by the CRA. The Company is awaiting its most recent CRA rating for the examination conducted in 2022. The latest New York StateNYSDFS CRA rating received by the Bank is “Satisfactory.”

Company was “Satisfactory” for the examination conducted in 2016.

USA PATRIOT Act and Money Laundering

The BankCompany is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”),BSA, which incorporates several laws, including the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the USA PATRIOT Act and related regulations. The USA PATRIOT Act gives the federal government powers to address money laundering and terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing, and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. By way of amendments to the BSA, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act implemented measures intended to encourage information sharing among bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies. Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial

21

institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Among other things, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act and the related regulations require:

Establishment of anti-money laundering compliance programs that include policies, procedures, and internal controls; the designation of a BSA officer; a training program; and independent testing;
Filing of certain reports to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and law enforcement that are designated to assist in the detection and prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing activities;
Establishment of a program specifying procedures for obtaining and maintaining certain records from customers seeking to open new accounts, including verifying the identity of customers;
In certain circumstances, compliance with enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls designed to detect and report money-laundering, terrorist financing and other suspicious activity;
Monitoring account activity for suspicious transactions; and
A heightened level of review for certain high-risk customers or accounts.

Establishment of anti-money laundering compliance programs that includes policies, procedures, and internal controls; the appointment of an anti-money laundering compliance officer; a training program; and independent testing;

Filing of certain reports to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and law enforcement that are designated to assist in the detection and prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing activities;

Establishment of a program specifying procedures for obtaining and maintaining certain records from customers seeking to open new accounts, including verifying the identity of customers;

In certain circumstances, compliance with enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls designed to detect and report money-laundering, terrorist financing and other suspicious activity;

Monitoring account activity for suspicious transactions; and

A heightened level of review for certain high risk customers or accounts.

The USA PATRIOT Act also includes prohibitions on correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks and requires compliance with record keeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign banks.

The Bankbank regulatory agencies have increased the regulatory scrutiny of the BSA and anti-money laundering programs maintained by financial institutions. Significant penalties and fines, as well as other supervisory orders may be imposed on a financial institution for non-compliance with these requirements. In addition, for financial institutions engaging in a merger transaction, federal bank regulatory agencies must consider the effectiveness of the financial institutions engaging in a merger transaction in combatinginstitution’s efforts to combat money laundering activities.

The BankCompany has adopted policies and procedures to comply with these requirements.

Privacy Laws

The BankCompany is subject to a variety of federal and state privacy laws, which govern the collection, safeguarding, sharing and use of customer information, and require that financial institutions have in place policies regarding information privacy and security. For example, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail consumer customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and practices for sharing nonpublic information with third parties, provide advance notice of any changes to the policies and provide such customers the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties. It also

19

requires banks to safeguard personal information of consumer customers. Some state laws also protect the privacy of information of state residents and require adequate security for such data, and certain state laws may, in some circumstances, require the BankCompany to notify affected individuals of security breaches of computer databases that contain their personal information. These laws may also require the BankCompany to notify law enforcement, regulators or consumer reporting agencies in the event of a data breach, as well as businesses and governmental agencies that own data.

Third-Party Debit Card Products and Merchant Services

The BankCompany is also subject to the rules of Visa, Mastercard and other payment networks in which it participates. If the BankCompany fails to comply with such rules, the networks could impose fines or require it to stop providing merchant services for cards under such network’s brand or routed through such network.

22

Consumer Finance Regulations

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. In this regard, the CFPB has commenced issuing several new rules tothat implement various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that were specifically identified as being enforced by the CFPB. See “Risk Factors — New and future rulemaking fromWhile the Company is subject to the CFPB may have a material effect onregulations, because it has less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, the operations and operating costs of the Bank”.

The FRB and the NYSDFS are responsible for examining and supervising the Bank’sCompany’s compliance with these consumer financial laws and regulations. In addition, the BankCompany is subject to certain state laws and regulations designed to protect consumers.

Other Regulations

The Bank’sCompany’s operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as:

The Truth-In-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X promulgated thereunder, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one-to four-family residential real estate receive various disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of settlement services;
The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C promulgated thereunder, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, and other fair lending laws, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex and other prohibited factors in extending credit;
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use of credit reports on consumers and the provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
Unfair or Deceptive or Abusive Acts or Practices laws and regulations;
The Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act; and
The rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with responsibility for implementing such federal laws.

The Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one-to four-family residential real estate receive various disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of settlement services;

The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

The Equal Credit Opportunity Act and other fair lending laws, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex and other prohibited factors in extending credit;

The Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use of credit reports on consumers and the provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices laws and regulations;

The Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and

The rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.

The operations of the BankCompany are further subject to the:

The Truth in Savings Act and Regulation DD promulgated thereunder, which specifies disclosure requirements with respect to deposit accounts;
The Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain the confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;
The Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;

The Truth in Savings Act, which specifies disclosure requirements with respect to deposit accounts;

The Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;

23

20

Table of Contents

The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check; and
State unclaimed property or escheatment laws; and
Cybersecurity regulations, including but not limited to those implemented by NYSDFS.

The Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;

The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check; and

State unclaimed property or escheatment laws.

Holding Company Regulation

The Company, as a bank holding company controlling the Bank, is subject to regulation and supervision by the FRB under the BHCA. The Company is periodically examined by and required to submit reports to the FRB and is required tomust comply with the FRB’s rules and regulations. Among other things, the FRB has authority to restrict activities by a bank holding company that are deemed to pose a serious risk to the subsidiary bank.

The FRB has historically imposed consolidated capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies structured similar, but not identical, to those of state member banks. The Dodd-Frank Act directed the FRB to issue consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to institutions themselves. The previously discussed final rule regarding regulatory capital requirements implemented the Dodd-Frank Act as to bank holding company capital standards. Consolidated regulatory capital requirements identical to those applicable to the subsidiary banks applied to bank holding companies as of January 1, 2015. The Company is subject to the consolidated holding company capital requirements.

The policy of the FRB is that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks by providing capital and other support in times of distress. The Dodd-Frank Act codified the source of strength policy.

Under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law, a bank holding company parent of an undercapitalized subsidiary bank is required to guarantee, within specified limits, the capital restoration plan that is required of an undercapitalized bank. If an undercapitalized bank fails to file an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement an acceptedacceptable plan, the FRB may prohibit the bank holding company parent of the undercapitalized bank from paying dividends or making any other capital distribution.

As a bank holding company, the Company is required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of a class of voting securities of any additional bank or bank holding company, to acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any additional bank or bank holding company or merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company. In evaluating acquisition application,applications, the FRB evaluates factors such as the financial condition, management resources and future prospects of the parties, the convenience and needs of the communities involved and competitive factors. In addition, bank holding companies may generally only engage in activities that are closely related to banking as determined by the FRB. Bank holding companies that meet certain criteria may opt to become a financial holding company and thereby engage in a broader array of financial activities.

FRB policy is that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the company’s net income for the past two years is sufficient to fund the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention is consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. In addition, FRB guidance sets forth the supervisory expectation that bank holding companies will inform and consult with FRB staff in advance of issuing a dividend that exceeds earnings for the quarter and should inform the FRB and should eliminate, defer or significantly reduce dividends if  (i) net income available to stockholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends, (ii) prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with the bank holding company’s capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition, or (iii) the bank holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.

21

A bank holding company that is not well capitalized or well managed, or that is subject to any unresolved supervisory issues, is required to give the FRB prior written notice of any repurchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for repurchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such

24

repurchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, will be equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The FRB may disapprove such a repurchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice or violate a law or regulation. However, FRB guidance generally provides for bank holding company consultation with FRB staff prior to engaging in a repurchase or redemption of a bank holding company’s stock, even if a formal written notice is not required.

The above FRB requirements may restrict a bank holding company’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders or engage in repurchases or redemptions of its shares.

Acquisition of Control of the Company

Under the Change in Bank Control Act, no person may acquire control of a bank holding company such as the Company unless the FRB has prior written notice and has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition. In evaluating such notices, the FRB takes into consideration such factors as the financial resources, competence, experience and integrity of the acquirer, the future prospects the bank holding company involved and its subsidiary bank and the competitive effects of the acquisition. Control, as defined under federal law, means ownership, control of or holding irrevocable proxies representing more than 25% of any class of voting stock, control in any manner of the election of a majority of the company’s directors, or a determination by the regulator that the acquirer has the power to direct, or directly or indirectly to exercise a controlling influence over, the management or policies of the institution. Acquisition of more than 10% of any class of a bank holding company’s voting stock constitutes a rebuttable presumption of control under the regulations under certain circumstances including where, as is the case with the Company, the issuer has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Federal Securities Laws

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

The Company is a reporting company subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Emerging Growth Company Status

The Jumpstart Our Business StartupsJOBS Act, (the “JOBS Act”), which was enacted in April 2012, has made numerous changes to the federal securities laws to facilitate access to capital markets. Under the JOBS Act, a company with total annual gross revenues of less than $1.07 billion during its most recently completed fiscal year qualifies as an Emerging Growth Company (“EGC”).EGC. The Company qualifiesqualified as an EGC under the JOBS Act.

An EGC may choose not to hold stockholder votes to approve annual executive compensation (more frequently referred to as “say-on-pay” votes) or executive compensation payable in connection with a merger (more frequently referred to as “say-on-golden parachute” votes). An EGC also is not subject to the requirement that its auditors attest to the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting, and can provide scaled disclosure regarding executive compensation. Finally, an EGC may elect to comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same manner as a private company, but must make such election when the company is first required to file a registration statement. Such an election is irrevocable during the period a company is an EGC.
A company losesAct until December 31, 2022.

The Company’s EGC status ended on the earlier of: (i)December 31, 2022 since that is the last day of the fiscal year of the company during which it had total annual gross revenues of  $1.07 billion or more; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuerCompany following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of the common equity securities of the companyCompany pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933; (iii) the date on which such company has, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; or (iv) the date on which such company is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations (generally, at least $700 million of voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates).

22

1933.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is intended to improve corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. The Company has policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations, and it reviews and documentdocuments such policies, procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance with these regulations.

23

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The Company’s operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described below, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of its common stock.

25

Risks Related to the COVD-19 Outbreak

The economic impact of the COVID-19 outbreak could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and capital stock.results of operations.

Given the ongoing and dynamic nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the rate of vaccine acceptance and the development of new variants, it is difficult to predict the full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our business. The extent of such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including when COVID-19 can be controlled and abated. As the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and any related adverse local and national economic consequences, we could be subject to any of the following risks, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations: the demand for our products and services may decline, making it difficult to grow assets and income; if the economy worsens, loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures may increase, resulting in increased charges and reduced income; collateral for loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, which could cause loan losses to increase; our ACL may increase if borrowers experience financial difficulties, which will adversely affect our net income; the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us; our cyber security risks may increase if a significant number of our employees are forced to work remotely; and FDIC premiums may increase if the agency experiences additional resolution costs.

Moreover, the Company’s future success and profitability substantially depends on the skills of its employees, including executive officers, many of whom have held their positions with the Company for many years. The unanticipated loss or unavailability of key employees and/or a large number of employees due to the pandemic could harm the Company’s ability to operate or execute its business strategy. The Company may not be successful in finding and integrating suitable replacements in the event of such employee loss or unavailability.

Risks Related to Lending Activities

A substantial portion of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of CRE, including multi-family real estate loans, and commercial loans, which have a higher degree of risk than other types of loans.

At December 31, 2022, $4.8 billion, or 99.5% of total loans, consisted of CRE and C&I loans. These portfolios have grown in recent years and the Company intends to continue to emphasize these types of lending. CRE, including multi-family real estate, and commercial loans are often larger and involve greater risks than other types of loans since payments on such loans are often dependent on the successful operation or development of the property or business involved. Accordingly, a downturn in the real estate market and/or a challenging business and economic environment may increase the Company’s risk related to CRE, multi-family real estate and commercial loans. If the cash flows from business operations of our customers is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Further, due to the larger average size of such loans and that they are secured by collateral that is generally less readily-marketable as compared with other loan types, losses incurred on a small number of such loans could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. If we foreclose on these loans, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for a single or multi-family residential property because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral.

In addition, CRE loan concentration is an area that has experienced heightened regulatory focus. Under CRE guidance issued by banking regulators, banks with holdings of CRE, land development, construction, and certain multi-family loans in excess of certain thresholds must employ heightened risk management practices, including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing. These loans are also subject to written policies that establish certain limits and standards. Such compliance requirements imposed on the Company’s CRE, multi-family or construction lending and the potential limits to the generation of these types of loans could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. While it is management’s belief that policies and procedures with respect to the CRE portfolio have been implemented consistent with this guidance, bank regulators could require that additional policies and procedures be implemented that may result in additional costs or that may result in the curtailment of CRE lending that would adversely affect the Bank’s loan originations and profitability.

26

Because the BankCompany intends to continue to increase its commercial loans, its credit risk may increase.

The BankCompany intends to increase its originationsportfolio of commercial loans, including working capital lines of credit, equipment financing, healthcare and medical receivables, documentary letters of credit and standby letters of credit. These loans generally have more risk than one-toone- to four-family residential mortgage loans and commercial loans secured by real estate.CRE loans. Since repayment of commercial loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’sborrowers’ businesses, repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the local and national economy. In addition, commercial loans generally have a larger average size as compared with other loans, such as residential loans, and the collateral for commercial loans is generally less readily-marketable. If we foreclose on these loans, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for a single or multi-family residential property because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral. The BankCompany’s plans to increase its originationportfolio of these loans could result in a material adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations.increased credit risk in the portfolio. An adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose the BankCompany to significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one-to-four-familyone-to four-family residential mortgage loan or a commercial real estateCRE loan.

A large portion

If the allowance for credit losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, earnings could decrease.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (ASC 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the CECL model. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2023. For a discussion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is unseasoned. Errorsimpact please see “NOTE 3  SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in judgingthis Form 10-K.

Loan customers may not repay their loans according to the collectabilityterms of unseasonedtheir loans, and the collateral securing the payment of their loans may leadbe insufficient to additional provisions for loan losses or charge-offs, which would reduce profits.

assure repayment. The Bank’s net loan portfolio has grown 73.0%, during the 3-year period ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and consumer loans made up 73.0%, 23.9% and 3.1% of the loan portfolio, respectively. At that same date, the average age of commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and multifamily loans was 2.6 years, 1.7 years and 1.3 years, respectively. It is difficult to assess the future performance of the Bank’s loan portfolio due to the recent origination of many of its loans. As a result, the BankCompany may experience more non-performing and delinquent loans than anticipated,significant credit losses, which would adversely affect results of operations.
The Bank must maintain and follow high loan underwriting standards to grow safely.
The Bank’s ability to grow its assets safely depends on maintaining disciplined and prudent underwriting standards and ensuring that its relationship managers and lending personnel follow those standards. The weakening of these standards for any reason, such as to seek higher yielding loans, or a lack of discipline or diligence by employees in underwriting and monitoring loans may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs and may necessitate that the Bank significantly increase its allowance for loan losses, any of which could adversely net income. As a result, the Bank’s business, results of operations, financial condition or future prospects could be adversely affected.
A substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio consists of multifamily real estate loans and commercial real estate loans, which have a higher degree of risk than other types of loans.
Multifamily and commercial real estate loans are often larger and involve greater risks than other types of loans. Because payments on such loans are often dependent on the successful operation or development of the property or business involved, repayment of such loans is often more sensitive than other types of loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the general business climate and economy. Accordingly, a downturn in the real estate market and a challenging business and economic environment may increase the Bank’s risk related to multifamily and commercial real estate loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to make repayment from their employment and other income and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, multifamily and commercial real estate loans typically are made on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the commercial venture. If the cash flow from business operations is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. In addition, due to the larger average size of each multifamily and commercial real estate loan as compared with other loans such as residential loans, as well as collateral that is generally less readily-marketable, losses incurred on a small number of multifamily and commercial real estate loans could have a material adverse impact on the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
24

In addition, commercial real estate loan concentration is an area that has experienced heightened regulatory focus. Under CRE Guidance issued by the FRB, the OCC and the FDIC, banks with holdings of commercial real estate, land development, construction, and certain multi-family loans in excess of certain thresholds must employ heightened risk management practices. These loans are also subject to written policies that are required by applicable regulations and that establish certain limits and standards. Any limitations on the Company’s commercial real estate, multi-family or construction lending, as a result of its need to comply with applicable regulations, regulatory guidance or supervisory expectations or otherwise, could have an adverse impact on its net interest income and could have a material adverse effect on its operating results. Various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the loan portfolio are made, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses, management reviews the quality of its loan portfolio and its loss and delinquency experience and evaluates industry trends and economic conditions.

The determination of the appropriate level of allowance is subject to judgment and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which are subject to material changes. If assumptions prove to be incorrect, the ACL may not cover losses in the loan portfolio at the date of the financial statements. Significant additions to the allowance would materially decrease net income. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review the ACL, the policies and procedures the Company uses to determine the level of the allowance and the value attributed to non-performing loans or to real estate acquired through foreclosure. Such regulatory agencies may require an increase in the ACL or the Company to recognize loan charge-offs. Any significant increase in the ACL or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition.

The performance of the Company’s multi-family and mixed-use loans could be adversely impacted by regulation.

Multi-family and mixed-use loans generally involve a greater risk than one- to-four family residential loans because of legislation and government regulations involving rent control and rent stabilization, which are outside the control of the borrower or the Company, and could impair the value of the security for the loan or the future cash flows of such properties. As a result of these restrictions, it is possible that rental income on certain rent-regulated properties might not rise sufficiently over time to satisfy increases in the loan rate at repricing or increases in overhead expenses (e.g., utilities, taxes, etc.). At December 31, 2022, the Company has $161.4 million of rent-regulated stabilized multi-family loans, which had a weighted-average LTV of 42.24% at the date of last appraisal, a weighted average debt coverage ratio of 3.34x.

27

The Company could be subject to environmental risks and associated costs on its foreclosed real estate assets, which could materially and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operation.

A material portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is comprised of loans collateralized by real estate. There is a risk that hazardous or toxic waste could be discovered on the properties that secure these loans. If the Company acquires such properties as a result of foreclosure, it could be held responsible for the cost of cleaning up or removing this waste, and this cost could exceed the value of the underlying properties and materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operation.

Risks Related to Economic Conditions

Inflation can have an adverse impact on our business and on our customers. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money.

Over the past year, in response to a pronounced rise in inflation, the Federal Reserve Board has raised certain benchmark interest rates to combat inflation. As discussed below under — “Risks Related to Market Interest Rates—Interest rate shifts may reduce net interest income and otherwise negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operation.” Inflationary conditions and rising market interest rates may lead to declines in the value of our investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, although this effect can be less pronounced for floating rate instruments. In addition, inflation generally increases the cost of goods and services we use in our business operations, such as electricity and other utilities, which increases our non-interest expenses. Furthermore, our customers are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of goods and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans with us. Sustained higher interest rates administered by the Federal Reserve to tame persistent inflationary price pressures could also push down asset prices and weaken economic activity. A deterioration in economic conditions in the United States and our markets could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for our products and services, all of which, in turn, would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As

A downturn in economic conditions could cause deterioration in credit quality, which could depress net income and growth.

The Company’s principal economic risk is the creditworthiness of its borrowers, which is affected by the strength of the relevant business market segment, local market conditions, and general economic conditions. The Company’s loan portfolio includes many real estate secured loans, demand for which may decrease during an economic downturn as a business operatingresult of, among other things, an increase in unemployment, a decrease in real estate values or a slowdown in housing. If negative economic conditions develop in the New York market or the United States, the Company could experience higher delinquencies and loan charge-offs, which would adversely affect its net income and financial services industry,condition. Furthermore, to the Bank’sextent that real estate collateral is obtained through foreclosure, the costs of holding and marketing real estate collateral, as well as the ultimate values obtained from disposition, could reduce earnings and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition.

The Company’s business and operations may be adversely affected in numerous and complex ways by weak economic conditions.

The Bank’sCompany’s business and operations, which primarily consist of lending money to customers, in the form of loans, borrowing money from customers in the form of deposits and investing in securities, are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in the United States. If the U.S. economy weakens, growth and profitability from the Bank’sCompany’s lending, deposit and investment operations could be constrained. Uncertainty about the federal fiscal policymaking process, the mediummedium- and long-term fiscal outlook of the federal government, and future tax rates is a concern for businesses, consumers and investors in the United States. In addition, economic conditions in foreign countries, including uncertainty over the stability of the euro currency, could affect the stability of global financial markets, which could hinder U.S. economic growth.

The Company’s business is also significantly affected by monetary and related policies of the U.S. federal government and its agencies. Changes in any of these policies are influenced by macroeconomic conditions and other factors that are beyond the Bank’sCompany’s control. Adverse economic conditions and government policy responses to such conditions could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of the Bank.Company.

28

A substantial majority of the Bank’sCompany’s loans and operations are in New York, and therefore its business is particularly vulnerable to a downturn in the New York City economy.

Unlike larger financial institutions

The Company is a community banking institution that are more geographically diversified, aprovides banking services to the local communities in the market areas in which it operates, and therefore, its ability to diversify its economic risks is limited by its local markets and economies. A large portion of the Bank’sCompany’s business is concentrated primarily in the state of New York, and in New York City in particular. A significant decline in local economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic calamities, unemployment or other factors beyond the Bank’sCompany’s control, would likely cause an increase in the rates of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures, bankruptcies and losses in its loan portfolio. As a result, of this lack of diversification in its loan portfolio, a downturn in the local economy, generally and the real estate market specifically, could significantly reduce the Bank’sCompany’s profitability and growth and adversely affect its financial condition.

Risks Related to Market Interest Rates

The reversal of monetary policy actions that resulted in a historically low interest rate environment may adversely affect our net interest income and profitability.

The Federal Reserve Board exercised monetary policy actions that decreased benchmark interest rates significantly, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Reserve Board has reversed its easy money policies given its concerns over inflation. Market interest rates have risen in response to the change in the Federal Reserve Board’s monetary policies. As discussed below, the increase in market interest rates is expected to have an adverse effect on our net interest income and profitability.

Interest rate shifts may reduce net interest income and otherwise negatively impact the Bank’sCompany’s financial condition and results of operations.

The majority of the Company’s banking assets are monetary in nature and subject to risk from changes in interest rates. Like most financial institutions, the Bank’sThe Company’s earnings and cash flows depend, to a great extent, upon the level of its net interest income (the difference between the interest income earned on loans),loans, investments, other interest earning assets, and the interest paid on interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.borrowings). Changes in interest rates can increase or decrease net interest income, because different types of assets and liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to market interest rate changes.

When interest bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly, or to a greater degree, than interest earning assets in a period, an increase in interest rates could reduce net interest income. Similarly, when interest earning assets mature or reprice more quickly, or to a greater degree, than interest bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce net interest income. Additionally, an increase in interest rates may, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and the Bank’sCompany’s ability to originate loans and decrease loan repayment rates. A decrease in the general level of interest rates may affect the BankCompany through, among other things, increased prepayments on its loan portfolio and increased competition for deposits. Accordingly,

25

changes in the level of market interest rates affect the Bank’sCompany’s net yield on interest earning assets, loan origination volume and overall results. Although the Bank’s asset-liability management strategy is designed to control and mitigate exposure to the risks related to changes in

If market interest rates those rates are affected by many factors outside of its control, including governmental monetary policies, inflation, deflation, recession, changes in unemployment, the money supply, international disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets.

The Bank’s smaller size makes it more difficult for it to compete.
The Bank’s smaller size makes it more difficult to compete with other financial institutions which are generally larger and can more easily afford to investrise rapidly, interest rate caps may limit increases in the marketing and technologies neededinterest rates on certain adjustable-rate loans, thus limiting the upside to attract and retain customers. Because the Bank’s principal source of income is theour net interest income. Also, certain adjustable-rate loans re-price based on lagging interest rate indices. This lagging effect may also negatively impact our net interest income earned on loans and investments after deductingwhen general interest paid on deposits and other sources of funds, the Bank’s ability to generate the revenues needed to cover expenses and finance such investments is limited by the size of its loan and investment portfolios. In addition, the Bank competes with many larger financial institutions and other financial companies who operate in the cash management solutions business, and is therefore, not always able to offer new products and services as quickly as its competitors. Lower earnings also make it more difficult to offer competitive salaries and benefits. As a smaller institution, it is also disproportionately affected by the continually increasing costs of compliance with new banking and other regulations.
The Bank relies heavily on its executive management team and other key employees, and could be adversely affected by the unexpected loss of their services.
The Bank’s success depends in large part on the performance of its key personnel, as well as on its ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified senior and middle management and other skilled employees. Competition for employees is intense, and the process of locating key personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute its business plan may be lengthy. The Bank may not be successful in retaining its key employees, and the unexpected loss of services of one or more of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on its business because of their skills, knowledge of primary markets, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. If the services of any key personnel should become unavailable for any reason, the Bank may not be able to identify and hire qualified persons on acceptable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects of the Bank.
Further, the Bank’s ability to retain key officers and employees may be impacted by legislation and regulation affecting the financial services industry. In 2016, the FRB and several other federal financial regulators revised and re-proposed rules to implement Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act Section 956 directed regulators to jointly prescribe regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements, or any feature of any such arrangement, at covered financial institutions, which includes a bank or bank holding company with $1 billion or more in assets, such as the Company and the Bank, that encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to a material financial loss. Further, the rule imposes enhanced risk management controls and governance and internal policy and procedure requirements with respect to incentive compensation. Accordingly, the Bank may be at a disadvantage to offer competitive compensation compared to other financial institutions or companies in other industries, which may not be subject to the same requirements.
The Bank may not be able to grow and if it does, it may have difficulty managing that growth.
The Bank’s ability to grow depends, in part, upon its ability to expand its market share, successfully attract core deposits, and identify loan and investment opportunities as well as opportunities to generate fee-based income. The Bank can provide no assurance that it will be successful in increasing the volume of loans and deposits at acceptable levels and upon terms it finds acceptable. The Bank also can provide no assurance that it will be successful in expanding its operations organically or through strategic acquisition while managing the costs and implementation risks associated with this growth strategy.
The Bank expects to grow in the number of employees and customers and the scope of its operations, but it may not be able to sustain its historical rate of growth orrates continue to grow its business at all. Its success will depend upon the ability of its officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve
26

operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships, and to hire, train and manage employees. In the event that the Bank is unable to perform all these tasks and meet these challenges effectively, including continuing to attract core deposits, its operations, and consequently its earnings, could be adversely impacted.
Any future acquisitions will subject the Company to a variety of risks, including execution risks, failure to realize anticipated transaction benefits, and failure to overcome integration risks, which could adversely affect growth and profitability.
The Company plans to grow its businesses organically. Although, currently, there are no plans, arrangements or understandings to make any acquisitions in the near-term, from time to time in the future the Company may consider acquisition opportunities that it believes support its businesses and enhances profitability. In the event that it does pursue acquisitions, the Company may have difficulty executing on acquisitions and may not realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction it may complete. Generally, any acquisition of target financial institutions, branches or other banking assets will require approval by, and cooperation from, a number of governmental regulatory agencies, possibly including the FRB, NYSDFS, and the FDIC. Such regulators could deny the application, which would restrict growth, or the regulatory approvals may not be granted on terms that are acceptable to the Company.
As to any acquisition that the Company completes, it may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated transaction benefits if the integration process takes longer or is more costly than expected or otherwise fails to meet expectations.
In addition, acquisition activities could be material to the Company’s business and involve a number of risks, including the following:

incurring time and expense associated with identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions and negotiating potential transactions, resulting in the Company’s attention being diverted from the operation of its existing business;

using inaccurate estimates and judgments to evaluate credit, operations, management and market risks with respect to the target institution or assets;

projected results may vary significantly from actual results;

intense competition from other banking organizations and other inquirers for acquisitions;

potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of banks and businesses the Company acquires;

unexpected asset quality problems;

the time and expense required to integrate the operations and personnel of the combined businesses;

experiencing higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations;

creating an adverse short-term effect on the results of operations;

losing key employees and customers as a result of an acquisition that is poorly received;

significant problems relating to the conversion of the financial and customer data of the entity;

integration of acquired customers into the Company’s financial and customer product systems;

risk of assuming businesses with internal control deficiencies; or

risks of impairment to goodwill or other than temporary impairment of investment securities.
Depending on the condition of any institution or assets or liabilities that the Company may acquire, that acquisition may, at least in the near term, adversely affect its capital and earnings and, if not successfully integrated with the organization, may continue to have such effects over a longer period. The Company may not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with potential acquisitions, and any acquisition considered will be subject to prior regulatory approval.
27

Additionally, acquisitions may involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and, therefore, may result in some dilution of the Company’s book value and net income per common share in connection with any future transaction. rise periodically.

The Company’s inability to overcome these risks could have a material adverse effect on its profitability, return on equity and return on assets, its ability to implement its business strategy and enhance stockholder value, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in card network fees could impact operations.
From time to time, the card networks increase the fees (known as interchange fees) that are charged to acquirers and that the Bank charges to its merchants. It is possible that competitive pressures will result in the Bank absorbing a portion of such increases in the future, which would its increase costs, reduce profit margin and adversely affect its business and financial condition. In addition, the card networks require certain capital requirements. An increase in the required capital level would further limit the use of capital for other purposes.
Changes in card network rules or standards could adversely affect the Bank’s business.
In order to provide its debit card and cash management solutions, the Bank is a member of the Visa and Mastercard networks. As such, it is subject to card network rules that could subject it to the assessment of a variety of fines or penalties. The termination of its membership or any changes in card network rules or standards, including interpretation and implementation of existing rules or standards, could increase the cost of operating its merchant servicer business or limit its ability to provide debit card and cash management solutions to or through its customers, and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank’s business could suffer if there is a decline in the use of prepaid cards as a payment mechanism or if there are adverse developments with respect to the prepaid financial services industry in general.
As the prepaid financial services industry evolves, consumers may find prepaid financial services to be less attractive than traditional or other financial services. Consumers might not use prepaid financial services for any number of reasons, including the general perception of the industry. If consumers do not continue or increase their usage of prepaid cards, including making changes in the way prepaid cards are loaded, the Bank’s operating revenues and prepaid card deposits may remain at current levels or decline. Any projected growth for the industry may not occur or may occur more slowly than estimated. If consumer acceptance of prepaid financial services does not continue to develop or develops more slowly than expected or if there is a shift in the mix of payment forms, such as cash, credit cards, traditional debit cards and prepaid cards, away from the Bank’s products and services, it could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s financial position and results of operations.
The Bank is subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud and data processing system failures and errors.
Employee errors and employee and customer misconduct could subject the Bank to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and have a material adverse impact on its reputation. Misconduct by its employees could include concealing unauthorized activities, engaging in improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions the Bank takes to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject the Bank to financial claims for negligence.
The Bank maintains a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate against operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. If internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse impact on the Bank’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, earnings could decrease.
Loan customers may not repay their loans according to the terms of their loans, and the collateral securing the payment of their loans may be insufficient to assure repayment. The Bank may experience
28

significant credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on its operating results. Various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the loan portfolio are made, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews the loans and the loss and delinquency experience and evaluates economic conditions.
The determination of the appropriate level of allowance is subject to judgment and requires the Bank to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which are subject to material changes. If assumptions prove to be incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not cover probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio at the date of the financial statements. Significant additions to the allowance would materially decrease net income. Non-performing loans may increase and non-performing or delinquent loans may adversely affect future performance. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review the allowance for loan losses, the policies and procedures the Bank uses to determine the level of the allowance and the value attributed to nonperforming loans or to real estate acquired through foreclosure. Such regulatory agencies may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any significant increase in allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition. See “Risk Factors — The FASB has recently issued an accounting standard update that will result in a significant change in how the Company recognizes credit losses and may have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.”
Changes in the valuation of the Bank’s securities portfolio could hurt profits and reduce stockholders’ equity.
The Bank’s securities portfolio may be impacted by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we reported an other comprehensive loss of $76.9 million related to net changes in unrealized losses in the AFS securities portfolio. Fluctuations in market value may be caused by changes in market interest rates, lower market prices for securities and limited investor demand. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, with more frequent evaluation for selected issues. If this evaluation shows impairment to the actual or projected cash flows associated with one or more securities, a potential loss to earnings may occur. Changes in interest rates can also have an adverse effect on the Bank’s financial condition, as its available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value and, therefore, are impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. The Company increases or decreases stockholders’ equity by the amount

29

Changes in the estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities may reduce stockholders’ equity and net income.

At December 31, 2022, we had $445.7 million of taxes. Declines in marketAFS securities. The estimated fair value could result in other-than-temporary impairments of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on net income and capital levels. Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Investments.”

The Bank may not be able to adequately measure and limit the credit risk associated with its loan portfolio, which could adversely affect its profitability.
The principal economic risk associated with each class of loans is the creditworthiness of the borrower, which is affected by the strength of the relevant business market segment, local market conditions, and general economic conditions. Additional factors related toAFS securities portfolio may change depending on the credit quality of commercial loans include the qualityunderlying issuer, market liquidity, changes in interest rates and other factors. Stockholders’ equity is increased or decreased by the amount of the managementchange in the unrealized gain or loss (difference between the estimated fair value and the amortized cost) of the business andAFS securities portfolio, net of the borrower’s ability bothrelated tax expense or benefit, under the category of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). During the year ended December 31, 2022, we reported an other comprehensive loss of $76.9 million related to properly evaluatenet changes in the supply and demand characteristics affecting the Bank’s market for products and services, and to effectively respond to those changes. Additional factors related to the credit quality of commercial real estate loans include tenant vacancy rates and the quality of management of the property. A failure to effectively measure and limit the credit risk associated with the loan portfolio could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Changes in economic conditions could cause an increase in delinquencies and nonperforming assets, including loan charge-offs, which could depress net income and growth.
The Bank’s loan portfolio includes many real estate secured loans, demand for which may decrease during economic downturns as a result of, among other things, an increase in unemployment, a decrease in real estate values and, a slowdown in housing. If negative economic conditions developunrealized losses in the New York market or the United States as a whole, the Bank could experience higher delinquencies and loan
29

charge-offs,AFS securities portfolio, which would adversely affect its net income and financial condition. Furthermore, to the extent that real estate collateral is obtained through foreclosure, the costs of holding and marketing real estate collateral,negatively impacted stockholders’ equity, as well as the ultimate values obtained from disposition, could reduce earnings and adversely affect the Bank’s financial condition.
The Bank operates in a highly competitive industry and faces significant competition from other financial institutions and financial services providers, which may decrease it growth or profits.
Consumer and commercial banking as well as cash management solutions are highly competitive industries. The Bank’s market area contains not only a large number of community and regional banks, but also a significant presence of the country’s largest commercial banks. The Bank competes with other state and national financial institutions, as well as savings and loan associations, savings banks and credit unions, for deposits and loans. In addition, it competes with financial intermediaries, such as consumer finance companies, specialty finance companies, commercial finance companies, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies, securities firms, mutual funds, and several government agencies, as well as major retailers, all actively engaged in providing various types of loans and other financial services, including cash management solutions. The Bank also faces significant competition from many larger institutions. Some of these competitors may have a longer history of successful operations nationally and in the New York market area, greater ties to businesses, expansive banking relationships, more established depositor bases, fewer regulatory constraints, and lower cost structures than the Bank does. Competitors with greater resources may possess an advantage through their ability to maintain numerous banking locations in more convenient sites, conduct more extensive promotional and advertising campaigns, or operate a more developed technology platform. Due to their size, many competitors may offer a broader range of products and services, as well as better pricing for certain products and services than the Bank can offer. Further, increased competition among financial services companies duebook value per common share.

Risk Related to the recent consolidation of certain competing financial institutions may adversely affect the Bank’s ability to market its products and services.

The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory, and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting), and merchant banking.
The Bank’s ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including:

the ability to develop, maintain, and build upon long-term customer relationships based on quality service and market knowledge;

the ability to attract and retain qualified employees to operate its business effectively;

the ability to expand its market position;

the scope, relevance, and pricing of products and services that are offered to meet customer needs and demands;

customer satisfaction with the Bank’s level of service; and

industry and general economic trends.
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken the Company’s competitive position, which could adversely affect its growth and profitability, which, in turn, could harm its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
A lack of liquidity could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Liquidity is essential to the Bank’s business. It relies on its ability to generate deposits and effectively manage the repayment and maturity schedules of loans to ensure that there is adequate liquidity to fund its operations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on liquidity. The Bank’s most important source of funds is deposits. Deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments as providing a better risk/return tradeoff, which are strongly influenced by such external factors as the direction of interest rates,
30

local and national economic conditions and competition for deposits in the markets the Bank serves. If customers move money out of bank deposits and into other investments such as money market funds, the Bank would lose a relatively low-cost source of funds, which would increase its funding costs and reduce net interest income. Any changes made to the rates offered on deposit products to remain competitive with other financial institutions may also adversely affect profitability and liquidity. Further, the demand for the deposit products offered may be reduced due to a variety of factors such as demographic patterns, changes in customer preferences, reductions in consumers’ disposable income, the monetary policy of the FRB, regulatory actions that decrease customer access to particular products, or the availability of competing products.
Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities, and proceeds from the issuance and sale of equity securities to investors. Additional liquidity is provided by the ability to borrow from the FHLB of New York. The Company also has an available line of credit with FRBNY discount window. The Bank also may borrow funds from third-party lenders, such as other financial institutions. The Bank’s access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize its activities, or on terms that are acceptable, could be impaired by factors that affect the Bank directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. The Bank’s access to funding sources could also be affected by a decrease in the level of its business activity as a result of a downturn in markets or by one or more adverse regulatory actions against it.
Any decline in available funding could adversely impact the Bank’s ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet expenses, or to fulfill obligations such as repaying borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on its liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank’s ability to maintain its reputation is critical to the success of its business, and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect its performance.
The Bank is a community bank, and reputation is one of the most valuable components of its business. As such, the Bank strives to conduct its business in a manner that enhances its reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring, and retaining employees who share the Bank’s core values of being an integral part of the communities it serves, delivering superior service to and caring about its customers. If the Bank’s reputation is negatively affected by the actions of its employees or for any other reason, its business, and therefore, its operating results may be materially adversely affected. Further, negative public opinion can expose it to litigation and regulatory action as it seeks to implement its growth strategy, which would adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
The Bank has lower lending limits and different lending risks than certain of its larger, more diversified competitors.
The Bank is a community banking institution that provides banking services to the local communities in the market areas in which it operates, and therefore, its ability to diversify its economic risks is limited by its own local markets and economies. The Bank lends, primarily, to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses, which may expose it to greater lending risks than those of banks that lend to larger, better-capitalized businesses with longer operating histories. In addition, the Bank’s legally mandated lending limits are lower than those of certain of its competitors that have greater capital. Lower lending limits may discourage borrowers with lending needs that exceed these limits from doing business with the Bank. The Bank may try to serve such borrowers by selling loan participations to other financial institutions; however, this strategy may not succeed.
The Bank faces risks related to its operational, technological and organizational infrastructure.
The Bank’s ability to grow and compete is dependent on its ability to build or acquire the necessary operational and technological infrastructure and to manage the cost of that infrastructure as it expands. Similar to other large corporations, operational risk can manifest itself in many ways, such as errors related to failed or inadequate processes, faulty or disabled computer systems, fraud by employees or outside persons and exposure to external events. In addition, the Bank is heavily dependent on the strength and
31

capability of its technology systems, which are used, both, to interface with customers and manage internal financial and other systems. The Bank’s ability to develop and deliver new products that meet the needs of its existing customers and attract new ones depends on the functionality of its technology systems. Additionally, the Bank’s ability to run its business in compliance with applicable laws and regulations is dependent on these infrastructures.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The Bank’s future success will depend in part upon its ability to address the needs of its clients by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy client demands for convenience as well as to provide secure electronic environments and create additional efficiencies in its operations as it continues to grow and expand its market area. The Bank continuously monitors its operational and technological capabilities and makes modifications and improvements when it believes it will be cost effective to do so. In some instances, it may build and maintain these capabilities internally. In connection with implementing new operational and technology enhancements or products in the future, the Bank may experience certain operational challenges (e.g. human error, system error, incompatibility, etc.), which could lead to significant costs to remedy any such challenges in a timely manner; and therefore, result in not fully realizing the anticipated benefits from such new technology. Many of the Bank’s larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in operational and technological infrastructure and have a significantly greater investment in operational and technological infrastructure. As a result, competitors may be able to offer additional or more convenient products compared to those that the Bank will be able to provide, which would put it at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, the Bank may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services, or be successful in marketing such products and services to its clients, which could impair growth and profitability.
The Bank also outsources some of its operational and technological infrastructure, including modifications and improvements to these systems, to third parties. If these third-party service providers experience difficulties, fail to comply with banking regulations or terminate their services and if the Bank is unable to replace them with other service providers, its operations could be interrupted. If an interruption were to continue for a significant period of time, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected, perhaps materially. Even if the Bank were able to replace the third-party providers, it may be at a higher cost, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. The Bank also face risk from the integration of new infrastructure platforms and/or new third party providers of such platforms into its existing businesses.
Operations

A failure in the Bank’sCompany’s operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could impair itsthe Company’s liquidity, disrupt its businesses, result in the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, damage its reputation and cause financial losses.

The Bank’sCompany’s operations rely on its computer systems, networks and third-party providers for the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other sensitive customer information. The Company’s business, and in particular, the debit card and cash management solutions business and global payments business, is partially dependent on its ability to process and monitor, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions, many of which are highly complex, across numerous and diverse markets. These transactions, as well as the information technology services provided to clients, often must adhere to client-specific guidelines, as well as legal and regulatory standards. Due to the breadth of the Bank’s client base and geographical reach of the Company’s client base, developing and maintaining its operational systems and infrastructure is challenging, particularly as a result of rapidly evolving legal and regulatory requirements and technological shifts. The Bank’s financial, accounting, data processing or other operating systems and facilities and those of the third-party service providers upon which it depends may fail to operate properly or become disabled. This could be a result of events such as a spike in transaction volume, cyber-attack or other unforeseen catastrophic events, which are wholly or partially beyond the control of the Company, and may adversely affect its ability to process these transactions or provide services.

The occurrence of fraudulent activity, breaches or failures of its information security controls or cybersecurity-related incidents could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank’s operations rely on its computer systems, networks and third party providers for the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other sensitive customer information. Under
32

various federal and state laws, the Bank is responsible for safeguarding such information. Ensuring that the collection, use, transfer and storage of personal information complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase costs.

Although the BankCompany takes protective measures to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availabilitysecurity of information, across all geographic and product lines, and endeavor to modify these protective measures as circumstances warrant, the nature of the threats continues to evolve. As a result, its computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, loss or destruction of data (including confidential client information), account takeovers, unavailability of service, computer viruses or other malicious code, cyber-attacks and other events that could have an adverse security impact. Despite the defensive measures taken to manage internal technological and operational infrastructure, these threats may originate externally from third parties such as foreign governments, organized crime and other hackers, and outsource or infrastructure-support providers and application developers, or may originate internally from within the organization. Furthermore, the BankCompany may not be able to ensure that all of its clients, suppliers, counterparties and other third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect themselves from cyber-attacks or to protect the confidentiality of the information that they exchange with us, particularly where such information is transmitted by electronic means. Given the increasingly high volume of transactions, certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they can be discovered and rectified. In addition, the increasing reliance on technology systems and networks and the occurrence and potential adverse impact of attacks on such systems and networks, both generally and in the financial services industry, have enhanced government and regulatory scrutiny of the measures taken by companies to protect against cyber-security threats. In particular, NYSDFS implemented heightened cybersecurity regulations in March, 2017. As these threats and government and regulatory oversight of associated risks continue to evolve, the Company may be required to expend additional resources to enhance or expand upon the security measures it currently maintains.

The networks and systems of the Bank, its customers and certain third-party partners, such as its online banking or reporting systems, execute transactions and maintain information pertaining to the Bank and its customers. The secure maintenance and transmission of confidential information, as well as execution of transactions over these systems, are essential to protect the Bank and its customers against fraud and security breaches and to maintain its clients’ confidence. In infrequent case, breaches of information security resulting from the intentional or unintentional acts by those having or gaining access to the Bank’s systems or its customers’, employees’ or counterparties’ confidential information, have occurred and may occur again. In addition, increases in criminal activity levels and sophistication, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries, and vulnerabilities in third-party technologies (including browsers and operating systems) or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that the Bank uses to prevent fraudulent transactions and protect Bank, customer and underlying transaction data. The Bank cannot be certain that the security measures taken, including those taken by the processors, to protect this sensitive data will be successful or sufficient to protect against all current and emerging threats designed to breach its systems or those of processors. Although the BankCompany has developed, and continues to invest in, systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks, a breach of its systems and global payments infrastructure or those of our fintech partners and processors could result in: losses to the BankCompany and its customers; loss of business and/or customers; damage to its reputation; the incurrence of additional expenses (including the cost of notification to consumers, credit monitoring and forensics, and fees and fines imposed by the card networks); disruption to its business; an inability to grow its online services or other businesses; additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties, penalties; and/or the exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability — any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’sCompany’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company faces risks related to its operational, technological and organizational infrastructure.

The Company’s ability to grow and compete is dependent on its ability to build or acquire and manage the necessary operational and technological infrastructure and to manage the cost of that infrastructure as it expands. Similar to other large corporations, operational risk can manifest itself in many ways, such as errors related to failed or inadequate processes, faulty or disabled computer systems, fraud by employees or outside persons and exposure to external events. In addition, the Company is heavily dependent on the strength and capability of its technology systems, which are used both to interface with customers and manage internal financial and other systems. The Company’s ability to develop and deliver

30

new products and services that meet the needs of its existing customers and attract new ones depends on the functionality of its technology systems.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The Company’s future success will depend in part upon its ability to address the needs of its clients by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy client demands for convenience as well as provide secure electronic environments and create additional efficiencies as it continues to grow and expand its market area. The Company continuously monitors its operational and technological capabilities and makes modifications and improvements when it believes it will be cost effective to do so. Many of the Company’s larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in operational and technological infrastructure. As a result, competitors may be able to offer more convenient products and services than the Company, which would put it at a competitive disadvantage.

The Company also outsources some of its operational and technological infrastructure, including modifications and improvements to these systems, to third parties. If these third-party service providers experience difficulties, fail to comply with banking regulations or terminate their services and if the Company is unable to replace them with other service providers, its operations could be interrupted. If an interruption were to continue for a significant period of time, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected, perhaps materially. Even if the Company were able to replace the third-party providers, it may be at a higher cost, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, customer or employee fraud and data processing system failures and errors.

Employee errors and employee and customer misconduct could subject the Company to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and have a material adverse impact on its reputation. Misconduct by its employees could include concealing unauthorized activities, engaging in improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions the Company takes to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject the Company to financial claims for negligence.

The Company maintains a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. If internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company relies heavily on its executive management team and other key employees and could be adversely affected by the unexpected loss of their services.

The Company’s success depends in large part on the performance of its key personnel, as well as on its ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified senior and middle management and other skilled employees. Competition for employees is intense, and the process of locating key personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute its business plan may be lengthy. The Company may not be successful in retaining its key employees, and the unexpected loss of services of one or more of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on its business because of their skills, knowledge of primary markets, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. If the Bank’sservices of any key personnel should become unavailable for any reason, the Company may not be able to identify and hire qualified persons on acceptable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects of the Company.

If the Company’s enterprise risk management framework is not effective at mitigating interest rate risk, market risk and loss, itstrategic risk, the Company could suffer unexpected losses and its results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The Bank’sCompany’s enterprise risk management framework seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between risk and return, which is critical to optimizing stockholder value. The BankCompany has established processes and procedures intended to

31

identify, measure, monitor report and analyzereport the types of risk to which it is subject, including credit, liquidity, operational, regulatory compliance and reputational risks. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to these risk management strategies as

33

there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that have not been appropriately anticipated or identified. If the Bank’sCompany’s risk management framework proves ineffective, it could suffer unexpected losses and its business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

A lack of liquidity could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity is essential to the Company’s business. The Company relies on its ability to generate deposits and effectively manage the repayment and maturity schedules of loans to ensure that there is adequate liquidity to fund its operations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale and maturities of loans and securities and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on liquidity. The Company’s most important source of funds is deposits. Deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments as providing a better risk/return tradeoff, which are strongly influenced by such external factors as the direction of interest rates, local and national economic conditions and the availability and attractiveness of alternative investments. Further, the demand for deposits may be reduced due to a variety of factors such as demographic patterns, changes in customer preferences, reductions in consumers’ disposable income, the monetary policy of the FRB or regulatory actions that decrease customer access to particular products. If customers move money out of bank deposits and into other investments such as money market funds, the Company would lose a relatively low-cost source of funds, which would increase its funding costs and reduce net interest income. Any changes made to the rates offered on deposits to remain competitive with other financial institutions may also adversely affect profitability and liquidity.

Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities and borrowings from the FHLB of New York. The Company also has an available line of credit with the FRBNY discount window. The Company also may borrow funds from third-party lenders, such as other financial institutions. The Company’s access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize its activities, or on terms that are acceptable, could be impaired by factors that affect the Company directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry, a decrease in the level of the Company’s business activity as a result of a downturn in markets or by one or more adverse regulatory actions against the Company.

Any decline in available funding could adversely impact the Company’s ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet expenses, or to fulfill obligations such as repaying borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on its liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Other Risks Related to the Company’s Business

New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time, we may implement new lines of business or offer new financial products or services within existing lines of business. Substantial risks and uncertainties are associated with developing and marketing new lines of business or new products or services, particularly in instances where markets are not fully developed, and we may be required to invest significant time and management and capital resources in connection with such new lines of business or new products or services. External factors, such as regulatory reception, compliance with regulations and guidance, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business or new product or service may be expensive to implement and could also have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could reduce our revenues and potentially generate losses.

The Company may be adversely impacted by the transition from LIBOR as a reference rate.

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority announced that after 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate the LIBOR. The overnight and 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month USD LIBOR settings will

32

cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. All other LIBOR settings ceased to be published or to be representative as of December 31, 2021. In the U.S., the Alternative Reference Rates Committee of the FRB and the FRBNY identified the SOFR as an alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rate.

The Company has a significant number of loans, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates may differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition may change the Company’s market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Additionally, banking regulators have stated that the failure to adequately prepare for LIBOR’s discontinuance could undermine financial stability and an institution’s safety and soundness and create litigation, operational and consumer protection risks. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with customers could adversely impact the Company’s reputation or could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is exposed to the risks of natural disasters and global market disruptions.

The Company handles a substantial volume of customer and other financial transactions every day. Its financial, accounting, data processing, check processing, electronic funds transfer, loan processing, online and mobile banking, automated teller machines, backup or other operating or security systems and infrastructure may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, including major infrastructure outages, natural disasters or events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts, pandemics, and cyber-attacks. Operational risk exposures could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, and cause reputational harm.

Additionally, global markets may be adversely affected by natural disasters, the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, cyber-attacks or campaigns, military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events. Global market disruptions may affect the Company’s business liquidity. Also, any sudden or prolonged market downturn in the United States or abroad, as a result of the above factors or otherwise could result in a decline in revenue and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition, including capital and liquidity levels.

Risks Related to the Company’s Global Payments Business

Regulatory scrutiny of BaaS solutions and related technology considerations has recently increased.

We provide global payments infrastructure access to our fintech partners, which includes serving as an issuing bank for third-party managed prepaid and debit card programs nationwide and providing other financial services infrastructure, including cash settlement and custodian deposit services. Recently, federal bank regulators have increasingly focused on the risks related to bank and fintech company partnerships, raising concerns regarding risk management, oversight, internal controls, information security, change management, and information technology operational resilience. This focus is demonstrated by recent regulatory enforcement actions against other banks that have allegedly not adequately addressed these concerns while growing their BaaS offerings. Additionally, there are ongoing investigations by federal and state governmental entities concerning a prepaid debit card product program that was offered by the Company through an independent program manager. We could be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny with respect to that portion of our business that could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects of the Company. See “Risk Factors The Company and the Bank’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be adversely affected by the highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern it.”

The Company faces intense competition in the global payments industry.

The global payments industry is highly competitive, continuously changing, highly innovative, and increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny and oversight. Many areas in which the Company competes evolve rapidly with innovative and disruptive technologies, shifting user preferences and needs, price sensitivity of merchants and consumers, and frequent introductions of new products and services. Competition also may intensify as new competitors emerge, businesses enter

33

into business combinations and partnerships, and established companies in other segments expand to become competitive with various aspects of our business.

The Company competes with a wide range of businesses, some of which are larger operationally and/or financially, have larger customer bases, greater brand recognition, longer operating histories, a dominant or more secure position, broader geographic scope, volume, scale, resources, and market share than the Company, or offer products and services that the Company does not offer, which may provide them significant competitive advantages. Some competitors may also be subject to less burdensome regulatory requirements or may be smaller or younger companies that may be more agile and effective in responding quickly to user needs, technological innovations, and legal and regulatory changes. These competitors may devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of products and services, and/or offer lower prices or more effectively offer their own innovative programs, products, and services. If the Company is not able to differentiate its products and services from those of its competitors, drive value for customers, or effectively and efficiently align its resources with its goals and objectives, the Company may not be able to compete effectively in the market.

We derive a percentage of our deposits from deposit accounts generated through our BaaS relationships.

Deposit accounts acquired through these relationships totaled $1.2 billion, or 23.5% of total deposits, at December 31, 2022. We provide oversight over these relationships, which must meet all internal and regulatory requirements. We may exit relationships where such requirements are not met or be required by our regulators to exit such relationships. Also, our partner(s) could terminate a relationship with us for many reasons, including being able to obtain better terms from another provider or dissatisfaction with the level or quality of our services. If a relationship were to be terminated, it could materially reduce our deposits and impact our liquidity. If we cannot replace such deposits, we may be required to seek alternative and potentially higher rate funding sources as compared to the existing relationship resulting in an increase in interest expense. We may also find it necessary to sell securities or other assets to meet funding needs, which could result in realized losses.

Changes in card network fees could impact operations.

Card networks periodically increase the fees (known as interchange fees) that are charged to acquirers and that the Company charges to its merchants. It is possible that competitive pressures will result in the Company absorbing a portion of such increases in the future, which would increase its costs, reduce profit margin and adversely affect its business and financial condition. In addition, the card networks require certain capital requirements. An increase in the required capital level would further limit the use of capital for other purposes.

The Company’s business could suffer if there is a decline in the use of prepaid cards as a payment mechanism or if there are adverse developments with respect to the prepaid financial services industry in general.

As the prepaid financial services industry evolves, consumers may find prepaid financial services to be less attractive than traditional or other financial services. If consumers do not continue or increase their usage of prepaid cards, including making changes in the way prepaid cards are loaded, the Company’s operating revenues and prepaid card deposits may remain at current levels or decline. Any projected growth for the industry may not occur or may occur more slowly than estimated. If consumer acceptance of prepaid financial services does not continue to develop or develops more slowly than expected or if there is a shift in the mix of payment forms away from the Company’s products and services, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

The potential for fraud in the card payment industry is significant.

Issuers of prepaid and debit cards and other companies have suffered significant losses in recent years with respect to the theft of cardholder data that has been illegally exploited for personal gain. The theft of such information is regularly reported and affects individuals and businesses. Losses from various types of fraud have been substantial for certain card industry participants. The Bank in many cases has indemnification agreements with third parties; however, such indemnifications may not fully cover losses. In addition, there are ongoing investigations by federal and state governmental entities concerning a prepaid debit card product program that was offered by the Company through an independent program

34

manager. See “Risk Factors The Company and the Bank’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be adversely affected by the highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern it.”

A portion of the Company’s business provided banking services to digital currency businesses and their customers, and changes in the digital currency industry or the digital currency businesses we provided services to may have adversely affected our growth and profitability or damaged our reputation.

The Company provided cash management solutions to digital currency businesses and their customers. The Company recently announced that it will fully exit its digital currency business due to recent developments in the crypto-asset industry, material changes in the regulatory environment regarding banks’ involvement in crypto-asset related businesses, and a strategic assessment of the business case for the Company’s further involvement at this time. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Events.”As a portion of our business provided banking services to digital currency businesses and their customers, changes in the regulatory environment, individually or in the aggregate, could have had a material adverse effect on our profitability, financial condition and growth of our business, or damage our reputation. Regulatory and legal requirements applicable to the prepaid and debit card industry are unique and frequently changing.

Achieving and maintaining compliance with frequently changing legal and regulatory requirements requires a significant investment in qualified personnel, hardware, software and other technology platforms, external legal counsel and consultants and other infrastructure components. These investments may not ensure compliance or otherwise mitigate risks involved in this business. Our failure to satisfy regulatory mandates applicable to prepaid financial products could result in actions against us by our regulators, legal proceedings being instituted against us by consumers, or other losses, each of which could reduce our earnings or result in losses, make it more difficult to conduct our operations, or prohibit us from conducting specific operations. Other risks related to prepaid cards include competition for prepaid, debit and other payment mediums, possible changes in the rules of networks, such as Visa and MasterCard and others, in which the Bank operates and state regulations related to prepaid cards including escheatment.

Risks Related to Competitive Matters

The Company operates in a highly competitive industry and faces significant competition from other financial institutions and financial services providers, the result of which may decrease growth or profits.

The Company’s market area contains not only a large number of community and regional banks, but also a significant presence of the country’s largest commercial banks and a growing presence of fintech financial services companies. The Company competes with other state and national financial institutions, savings and loan associations, savings banks, credit unions and other companies offering financial services. Some of these competitors have a longer history of successful operations nationally and in the New York market area, greater ties to businesses, more expansive banking relationships, more established depositor bases, fewer regulatory constraints, better technology, and lower cost structures than the Company does. Competitors with greater resources may possess an advantage through their ability to maintain numerous banking locations in more convenient sites, conduct more extensive promotional and advertising campaigns, or operate a more developed technology platform. Due to their size, many competitors may offer a broader range of products and services, as well as better pricing for certain products and services than the Company can offer. Further, increased competition among financial services companies due to the continued consolidation of financial institutions may adversely affect the Company’s ability to market its products and services.

In addition, the Company’s legally mandated lending limits are lower than those of certain of its competitors that have greater capital. Lower lending limits may discourage borrowers with lending needs that exceed these limits from doing business with the Company. The Company may try to serve such borrowers by selling loan participations to other financial institutions; however, this strategy may not succeed.

35

Risks Related to Business Strategy

The Company may not be able to grow and if it does, it may have difficulty managing that growth.

The Company’s ability to grow depends, in part, upon its ability to expand its market share, successfully attract deposits, and identify loan and investment opportunities as well as opportunities to generate fee-based income. The Company may not be successful in increasing the volume of loans and deposits at acceptable levels and upon terms it finds acceptable. The Company may also not be successful in expanding its operations organically or through strategic acquisitions while managing the costs and implementation risks associated with this growth strategy.

The Company expects to grow the number of employees and customers and the scope of its operations, but it may not be able to sustain its historical rate of growth or continue to grow its business at all. Its success will depend upon the ability of its officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships, and to hire, train and manage employees. In the event that the Company is unable to perform all these tasks and meet these challenges effectively, its growth prospects and earnings could be adversely impacted.

Risks Related to Accounting Matters

Changes in accounting standards could materially impact the Company’s financial statements.

From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB or the SEC may change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. Such changes may result in it being subject to new or changing accounting and reporting standards. In addition, the bodies that interpret the accounting standards (such as banking regulators, outside auditors or management) may change their interpretations or positions on how these standards should be applied. These changes may be beyond the Company’s control, can be hard to predict, and can materially impact how it records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retrospectively, or apply an existing standard differently, also retrospectively, in each case resulting in it needing to revise or restate prior period financial statements.

For more information on changes in accounting standards, see “NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

The Bank could be subject to environmental risks and associated costsFASB issued an accounting standard update that will result in a significant change in how the Company recognizes credit losses, which may have a material impact on its foreclosed real estatefinancial condition or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (ASC 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the CECL model. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2023. For a discussion of the impact please see “NOTE 3  SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K. Under the CECL model, the Company is required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and HTM debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first entered into and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current GAAP, which coulddelays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, the Company expects that utilization of the CECL model will materially affect how it determines the ACL and the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of the ACL. If the Company is required to materially increase its level of the ACL for any reason, such increase could adversely affect it.its business, financial condition and results of operations.

A material portion

36

Risk Related to Laws and Regulation and Their Enforcement

The Company and the properties that secure these loans. If the Bank acquires such properties as a result of foreclosure, it could be held responsible for the cost of cleaning up or removing this waste, and this cost could exceed the value of the underlying properties and materially and adversely affect it.

The Company’sBank’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be adversely affected by the highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern its operations, corporate governance, executive compensationit.

The Company and accounting principles, or changes in any of them.

As a bank holding company, the Company isBank are subject to extensive examination, supervision and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies that govern almost all aspects of itstheir operations. These laws and regulations are not intended to protect the Company’s stockholders. Rather, these laws and regulations are intended to protect customers, depositors, the DIF and the overall financial stability of the U.S economy. These laws and regulations, among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, impose limitations on the business activities in which the Company or the Bank can engage, limit the dividend or distributions that the Bank can pay to it,the Company, restrict the ability of institutions to guarantee itsthe Company’s debt, and impose certain specific accounting requirements that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or earlier charges to earnings or reductions in capital than generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP would require.

Additionally, there are ongoing investigations by federal and state governmental entities concerning a prepaid debit card product program that was offered by the Company through an independent program manager. These include investigations as to which the Company is a subject by the FRB and certain state authorities, including the NYSDFS. During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, third parties used this prepaid debit card product to establish unauthorized accounts and to receive unauthorized government benefits payments, including unemployment insurance benefits payments made pursuant to the CARES Act from many states. The Company ceased accepting new accounts from this program manager in July of 2020 and has exited its relationship with this program manager. The Company is cooperating in these investigations and continues to review this matter. The foregoing could result in enforcement or other actions against the Company and the Bank including civil money penalties and remedial measures.

The Company is in discussions with the FRB and the NYSDFS with respect to consensual resolutions of their investigations. Although the Company is unable at this time to determine the final terms on which the FRB and NYSDFS investigations will be resolved or the timing of such resolutions, the Company accrued a charge of $35.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2022 to establish a reserve for what the Company believes is a reasonable estimate of the probable loss associated with the FRB and NYSDFS settlements. If final settlements with the FRB and the NYSDFS are not reached and the FRB and the NYSDFS do bring public enforcement actions, such actions and their resolution, as well as any other matter arising out of the foregoing program, could have a materially adverse effect on the Company and the Bank’s assets, business, cash flows, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and/or results of operations.

Compliance with these laws and regulations is difficult and costly, and changes to these laws and regulations often impose additional compliance costs. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations even if the failure follows good faith effort or reflects a difference in interpretation, could subject the Company and/or the Bank to restrictions on itstheir business activities, fines and other penalties, the commencement of informal or formal enforcement actions against us,them, and other negative consequences, including reputational damage, any of which could adversely affect itstheir business, financial condition, results of operations, capital base and the price of its securities. Further, any new laws, rules and regulations could make compliance more difficult or expensive.

Likewise, the Company operates in an environment that imposes income taxes on its operations at both the federal and state levels to varying degrees. Strategies and operating routines have been implemented to minimize the impact of these taxes. Consequently, any change in tax legislation could significantly alter the effectiveness of these strategies.
The net deferred tax asset reported on the Company’s balance sheet generally represents the tax benefit of future deductions from taxable income for items that have already been recognized for financial reporting purposes. The bulk of these deferred tax assets consists of deferred loan loss deductions, deferred compensation deductions and unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities. The net deferred tax asset is measured by applying currently-enacted income tax rates to the accounting period during which the tax benefit is expected to be realized. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s net deferred tax asset $4.4 million.
34

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Act, which includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system including: a federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%; limitations on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation; creation of BEAT, a new minimum tax; and the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a modified territorial tax system. The Tax Act resulted in a one-time U.S. tax expense of  $1.6 million. A majority of the provisions in the Tax Act are effective January 1, 2018.
Federal and state regulators periodically examine the Bank’s business, and the Company may be required to remediate adverse examination findings.
The FRB and the NYSDFS, periodically examine the Bank’s business, including compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, a federal banking agency were to determine that the Bank was in violation of any law or regulation; or that the Bank’s financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of operations had become unsatisfactory, it may take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, direct an increase in capital, restrict the Bank’s growth, assess civil monetary penalties against officers or directors, and remove officers and directors. If it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, the Bank’s deposit insurance could be terminated, and it could be placed into receivership or conservatorship. If the Bank become subject to any regulatory actions, there could be a material adverse impact on its business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future may increase the Company’s costs and impact its business, governance structure, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company operates in a highly regulated industry with multiple regulators and is subject to a changing regulatory environment.

The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, imposed higher capital requirements on bank holding companies and changed the base forrules regarding FDIC insurance assessments from a bank’s deposit base to its average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity, permanently raised the current standard deposit insurance limit to $250,000, and expanded the FDIC’s authority to raise insurance premiums. The Dodd-Frank Act established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) as an independent entity within the FRB, which has broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authority over consumer financial products and services, including deposit products, prepaid cards, residential mortgages, home-equity loans and credit cards and contains provisions on mortgage-related matters, such as steering incentives, determinations as to a borrower’s ability to repay and prepayment penalties. Although the applicability of certain elements of the Dodd-Frank Act is limited to institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, there can be no guarantee that such applicability will not be extended in the future or that regulators or other third parties will not seek to impose such requirements on institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as the Bank.

Compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations has and will continue to result in additional operating and compliance costs that could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects of the Company.
While most of

Legislative and regulatory actions may increase the changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act that impact the Company have been implemented or are expected to follow a known trajectory, new changes under the Trump administration, including their nature, timingCompany’s costs and impact cannot yet be determined with any degreeits business, governance structure, financial condition or results of certainty. operations.

Federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. Certain aspects of current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry, if enacted or adopted couldcould: expose itthe Company to additional costs, including increased compliance costs; impact the profitability of the Company’s business activities; limit the fees we may charge; increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products; change deposit insurance assessments; require more oversight; or change certain of its business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans

37

and achieve satisfactory interest rate spreads. These changes may also require the Company to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to operations and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

35

As a result

Federal income tax treatment of the Dodd-Frank Act and recent rulemaking, the Company is subject to more stringent capital requirements.

In July 2013, the U.S. federal banking authorities approved new regulatory capital rules implementing the Basel III regulatory capital reforms effecting certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The new regulatory capital requirements are generally applicable to all U.S. banks as well as to bank and saving and loan holding companies, other than “small bank holding companies” (generally bank holding companies with consolidated assets of less than $1.0 billion). The new regulatory capital rules not only increase most of the required minimum regulatory capital ratios, but also introduce a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio and the concept of a capital conservation buffer. The new regulatory capital rules also expand the current definition of capital by establishing additional criteria that capital instruments must meet to be considered additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. In order to be a “well-capitalized” depository institution under the new regime, an institution must maintain a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5% or more; a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% or more; a total capital ratio of 10% or more; and a leverage ratio of 5% or more. A BHC institution must maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% or more; and a total capital ratio of 6% or more. Banks and BHCs must also maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of common equity Tier 1 capital. The new regulatory capital rules became effective as applied to the Company on January 1, 2015 with a phase-in period that generally extends through January 1, 2019 for certain of the changes. Previously, as a BHC with less than $1 billion in consolidated assets, the Company was not subject to consolidated capital requirements. During the course of 2016, the Company’s consolidated assets exceeded $1 billion and, as a result, the Company is now subject to capital requirements with a phase-in period that generally extends through January 1, 2019 for certain of the changes, as discussed above.
The Company may need to raise additional capital in the future to gain sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet regulatory requirements, its commitments and business needs, which could include the possibility of financing acquisitions. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities, and the Company’s financial condition and performance. The failure to meet applicable regulatory capital requirements, including the minimum capital requirements established by the FRB, could result in one or more of the regulators placing limitations or conditions on the Company’s activities, including its growth initiatives, or restricting the commencement of new activities; which could affect customer and investor confidence, the Company’s costs of funds and FDIC insurance costs, its ability to pay dividends on common stock, its ability to make acquisitions, and its business, results of operations and financial conditions, generally.
The Company is subject to the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties.
The CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. With respect to the Bank, the NYSDFS, FRB, the United States Department of Justicecorporations and other federal and state agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA tax provisions may be clarified and/or fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity and restrictions on expansion. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
The FASB has recently issued an accounting standard update that will result in a significant change in how the Company recognizes credit losses and may have a material impact on its financial conditionmodified by legislative, administrative or results of operations.
In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, the Company will be required to present certain
36

financial assets carriedjudicial changes or interpretations at amortized cost,any time. Any such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, the Company expects that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how it determines allowance for loan losses and could require it to significantly increase the allowance. Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of allowance for loan losses. If the Company is required to materially increase its level of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increasechanges could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The new CECL standard will become effective for the Company, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the CECL model will have on its accounting; however, consistent with regulatory expectations set forth in interagency guidance issued at the end of 2016, it expects to recognize a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to allowance for loan losseseither directly, or indirectly as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective. The Company cannot yet determine the magnitude of any such one-time cumulative adjustment or of the overall impact of the new standard on its financial condition or results of operations.
FDIC deposit insurance assessments may continue to materially increase in the future, which would have an adverse effect on earnings.
As an FDIC insured institution the Bank is assessed a quarterly deposit insurance premium. Failed banks nationwide have significantly depleted the insurance fund and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. The FDIC has adopted a Deposit Insurance Fund Restoration Plan, which requires the FDIC’s DIF to attain a 1.35% reserve ratio by December 31, 2020. As a result of this requirement,effects on the Bank could be required to pay significantly higher premiums or additional special assessments, which would adversely affect its earnings, thereby reducing the availability of funds to pay dividends to the Company.
Company’s customers.

Monetary policies and regulations of the FRB could adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, the Company’s earnings and growth are affected by the policies of the FRB. An important function of the FRB is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the FRB to implement these objectives are open market purchases and sales of U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in banks’ reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to combat inflation and influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.

The monetary policies and regulations of the FRB have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations cannot be predicted.

The Bank faces a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action

Non-compliance with the Federal Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing statutes and regulations.

The BSA, the USA PATRIOT Act, andBSA, or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions.

The USA PATRIOT and the BSA require financial institutions among others, to institutedevelop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and maintain an effective anti-money laundering compliance program andterrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file reports such as suspicious activity reports with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and currency transaction reports. The Bank’s products and services, including its debit card issuing business, are subjectverifying the identity of customers seeking to an increasingly strict set of legal and regulatory requirements intended to protect consumers and help detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit activities. The Bank is requiredopen new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions. While we have developed policies and other anti-money laundering requirements. The federal banking agencies and the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network are authorizedprocedures designed to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of

37

those requirements and have recently engagedassist in coordinated enforcement efforts against banks and other financial services providers with the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service. The Bank is also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the regulations administered and enforced by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. If the Bank violates these laws and regulations, or if its policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, the Bank would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on its ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of its business plan, including any acquisition plans.
Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for the Bank. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
The FRB may require the Company to commit capital resources to support the Bank.
Federal law requires that a bank holding company act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the “source of strength” doctrine, the FRB may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to a subsidiary bank. A capital injection may be required at times when the holding company may not have the resources to provide it and therefore may be required to borrow the funds or raise capital. Any loans by a holding company to its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank. Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of the institution’s general unsecured creditors, including the holders of its note obligations. Thus, any borrowing that must be done by the Company to make a required capital injection becomes more difficult and expensive and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank could be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions and other third parties it relies on.
Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. The Bank has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks and other institutional customers. Many of these transactions expose the Bank to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, its credit risk may be exacerbated when its collateral cannot be foreclosed upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due. Furthermore, successful operation of the debit card and cash management solutions business depends on the soundness of third party processors, clearing agents and others that the Bank relies on to conduct its merchant business. Any losses resulting from such third parties could adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
The Bank depends on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with existing and potential customers and counterparties, the Bank may rely on information provided by or on behalf of its existing and potential customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. The Bank also may rely on representations of existing and potential customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. In deciding whether to extend credit, the Bank may rely upon existing and potential customers’ representations that their respective financial statements conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. The Bank also may rely on customer and counterparty
38

representations and certifications, or other auditors’ reports, with respect to the business and financial condition of existing and potential customers and counterparties. The Company’s financial condition, results of operations, financial reporting and reputation could be negatively affected if the Bank relies on materially misleading, false, incomplete, inaccurate or fraudulent information provided by or on behalf of existing or potential customers or counterparties.
The Company’s accounting estimates and risk management processes and controls rely on analytical and forecasting techniques and models and assumptions, which may not accurately predict future events.
The Company’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how it records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. Management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so they comply with GAAP and reflect management’s judgment of the most appropriate manner to report financial condition and results. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which may be reasonable under the circumstances, yet which may result in the reporting of materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative.
Certain accounting policies are critical to presenting the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. They require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. These critical accounting policies include the allowance for loan losses and income taxes. Because of the uncertainty of estimates involved in these matters, the Company may be required to do one or more of the following: significantly increase the allowance for loan losses or sustain loan losses that are significantly higher than the reserve provided; reduce the carrying value of an asset measured at fair value; or significantly increase accrued tax liability. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.
The Company’s internal controls, disclosure controls, processes and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures are based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable (not absolute) assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of controls, processes and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls, processes and procedures could necessitate changes in those controls, processes and procedures, which may increase compliance costs, divert management attention from the business or subject the Company to regulatory actions and increased regulatory scrutiny. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
The reduced disclosures and relief from certain other significant disclosure requirements that are available to emerging growth companies may result in the Company’s financial statement not being comparable to the financial statements of public companies that are not allowed the same relief.
The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and it intends to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that apply to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.” The JOBS Act permits the Company an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards affecting public companies. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period, which means that its financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statementseffective in preventing violations of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards on a non-delayed basis.
these laws and regulations. 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2.  Properties

The Company’s headquarters are located at 99 Park Avenue, New York, New York. The Company has six banking centers – four are in Manhattan, New York, one is in Brooklyn, New York and one is in Long Island, New York. The Company believes that current facilities at its branches are adequate to meet its present and foreseeable needs.

We lease a property in Florida that is utilized as a loan production office and a property in New Jersey that is utilized as an administrative office. We also lease a property in Kentucky that is utilized as office space for our Global Payments Group. All the leases on these properties expire at various dates through 2035.

As of December 31, 2017,2022, each of the Company’s offices and banking centers are leased, and it considersexcept for 1302-13th Avenue Brooklyn, which is to be used in the current facilities adequate to meet present and foreseeable needs, subject to possible future expansion.

39

as its Brooklyn banking center.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

The BankCompany is subject to certain pending and threatened legal actions that arise out of the normal course of business.  Management, following consultation with legal counsel, does not expect the ultimate disposition of any or a combination of these matters to have a material adverse effect on its business. However, givenGiven the nature, scope and complexity of the extensive legal and regulatory landscape applicable to the business (including

38

(including laws and regulations governing consumer protection, fair lending, fair labor, privacy, information security and anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws), the Bank,Company, like all banking organizations, is subject to heightened legal and regulatory compliance and litigation risk.

The Company is in discussions with the FRB and the NYSDFS with respect to consensual resolutions of their investigations. Although the Company is unable at this time to determine the final terms on which the FRB and NYSDFS investigations will be resolved or the timing of such resolutions, the Company accrued a charge of $35.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2022 to establish a reserve for what the Company believes is a reasonable estimate of the probable loss associated with the FRB and NYSDFS settlements. If final settlements with the FRB and the NYSDFS are not reached and the FRB and the NYSDFS do bring public enforcement actions, such actions and their resolution, as well as any other matter arising out of the foregoing program, could have a materially adverse effect on the Company and the Bank’s assets, business, cash flows, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and/or results of operations.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

40

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s shares of common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MCB”. The approximate number of holders of record of the Company’s common stock as of MarchFebruary 23, 20182023 was 95.75. The Company’s common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 8, 2017. The Company has not declared any dividends to date.

The following table shows the price per share of the Company’s common stock since the date of the Initial Public Offering (“IPO”).
Price Per Share
2017
HighLow
Fourth quarter (from November 8th, 2017)
$50.03$36.99

The Company has not historically declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock and does not expect to pay for the foreseeable future. Instead, the Company anticipates that all of its future earnings will be retained to support operations and to finance the growth and development of the business.stock. Any future determination to pay dividends on the Company’s common stock will be made by its Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including:

historical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations;
the Company’s capital levels and requirements;
statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations;
any contractual restriction on the Company’s ability to pay cash dividends, including pursuant to the terms of any of its credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements;
business strategy;
tax considerations;
alternative use of funds, such as for any potential acquisitions;
general economic conditions; and
other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

historical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations;

the Company’s capital levels and requirements;

statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations;

any contractual restriction on the Company’s ability to pay cash dividends, including pursuant to the terms of any of its credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements;

business strategy;

tax considerations;

any acquisitions or potential acquisitions;

general economic conditions; and

other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
There are various legal limitations with respect to the Company’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders and the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company. Under the New York Business Corporation Law, the Company may pay dividends on its outstanding shares unless the Company is insolvent or would be made insolvent by the dividend. Dividends may be declared or paid and other distributions may be made either (1) out of surplus, so that the net assets of the corporation remaining after such declaration, payment or distribution shall at least equal the amount of its stated capital, or (2) in case there shall be no such surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.
The Company is also subject to certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends as a result of banking laws, regulations and policies. The FRB has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies. In general, the FRB’s policy provides that dividends should be paid only to the extent that the Company’s new income for the past two years is sufficient to fund the dividends and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the Company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB has the authority to prohibit a bank holding company from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice. See “Item 1. Business — Regulation — Holding Company Regulation.”
41

The Company is dependent upon the payment of dividends by the Bank as its principal source of funds to pay dividends in the future, if any, and to make other payments. The Bank is also subject to various legal, regulatory and other restrictions on its ability to pay dividends and make other distributions and payments to us. A New York state member bank may generally declare a dividend, without approval from the NYSDFS or the FRB, in an amount equal to its year-to-date net income plus the prior two years’ net income that is still available for dividends. The NYSDFS and the FRB have the authority to prohibit a New York commercial bank from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, as a depository institution the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC, the Bank may not pay dividends or distribute any of its capital assets while it remains in default on any assessment due to the FDIC or if in the FDIC’s opinion, the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
As discussed in Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, the Company completed its initial public offering on November 10, 2017. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering as described in its prospectus dated November 7, 2017.

There were no sales of unregistered securities or repurchases of shares of common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2017.

The Company did not repurchase any of its common stock during the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.

39

Performance Graph

The Company’s common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 8, 2017 following its initial public offering. Duringgraph compares, for the period from November 8, 2017 to December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2022, the cumulative total shareholder return on(change in the Company’sstock price plus reinvested dividends) for the common stock was 13%. By comparison, the cumulative total return on Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I (VRTIX) over the same period was 3%.

Set forth below is information as of December 31, 2017 regarding equity compensation plans. The plan that has been approved by the stockholders is the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.
PlanNumber of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options and
rights
Weighted average
exercise price
Number of securities
remaining available for
issuance under plan
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders271,500$19.97823,629
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
42

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data
The consolidated financial and other data of the Company as of andwith the cumulative return for the years ended(i) Standard and Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index and (ii) KBW Bank Index. The performance reflected below assumes that $100 was invested in our common stock and each of the indices at their closing prices on December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 set forth2017. The performance of our common stock reflected below is derived in part from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. Dollars below are in thousands.
At December 31,
201720162015
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Cash and cash equivalents$261,231$82,931$65,647
Investment securities available for sale32,15737,32947,467
Investment securities held to maturity5,4286,5004,974
Loans, net1,405,0091,042,731810,356
Premises and equipment, net6,2685,0354,640
FRB stock, at cost3,9113,2392,384
FHLB stock, at cost2,7664,3495,022
Accrued interest receivable4,4212,7352,301
Goodwill9,7339,7339,733
Other assets28,93125,71912,264
Total Assets$1,759,855$1,220,301$964,788
Deposits$1,404,355$993,780$766,039
FHLB Advances42,19878,41896,147
Trust preferred securities payable20,62020,62020,620
Subordinated notes payable, net of issuance costs24,489
Other liabilities31,30917,9926,030
Total Liabilities$1,522,971$1,110,810$888,836
Total Equity$236,884$109,491$75,952
For the Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest and dividend income$60,753$44,155$32,682
Interest expense8,6716,0895,260
Net interest income52,08238,06627,422
Provision for loan losses7,0598,0602,015
Net interest income after provision for loan losses45,02330,00625,407
Noninterest income11,3005,4234,498
Noninterest expense32,74527,37123,077
Income before income tax expense23,5788,0586,828
Income tax expense11,2093,0452,559
Net income$12,369$5,013$4,269
43

not necessarily indicative of our future performance.

Graphic

TABLE OF CONTENTS
At December 31,
201720162015
Selected Ratios:
Performance Ratios
Return on average assets0.81%0.46%0.50%
Return on average equity9.275.566.21
Net interest spread2.943.533.33
Net interest margin3.543.263.07
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities198.12158.74139.52
Dividend payout ratio0.000.000.00
Non-interest expense/average assets2.152.492.71
Efficiency ratio51.6662.9472.29
Average equity to average total asset ratio8.768.228.06
Basic: Earnings/share2.400.431.54
Diluted: Earnings/share2.340.431.54
Asset Quality Ratios
Non-Performing loans to total loans0.240.350.25
Allowance for loan losses to total loans1.051.121.21
Non-performing loans to total assets0.190.300.22
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans439.21322.82478.38
Capital Ratios
The Company:
Tier 1 leverage ratio13.7110.499.34
Common equity tier 115.3310.8010.44
Total risk-based capital ratio19.9012.4511.98
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio17.0911.3210.93
Metropolitan Commercial Bank:
Tier 1 leverage ratio14.7110.419.26
Common equity tier 118.4011.2510.83
Total risk-based capital ratio19.4012.3812.08
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio18.4011.2510.83
44

Item 6. [Reserved]

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary

The Company is a bank holding company headquartered in New York, New York and registered bank holding company.under the BHC Act. Through its wholly owned bank subsidiary, Metropolitan Commercial Bank (the “Bank”), a New York state chartered bank, the Bank, with fiveCompany provides a broad range of business, commercial and retail offices locatedbanking products and services to small businesses, middle-market enterprises, public entities and affluent individuals in the New York metropolitan area, it offersarea. In addition, the Global Payments Group is an established leader in BaaS to a wide varietymyriad of businessdomestic and personal banking productsinternational fintech companies. For an analysis of 2021 results compared with 2020 results, see Part II, Item 7., “Management's Discussion and services. Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC.

40

The Bank offers a traditional range of services to individuals, businesses and others needing banking services. ItsCompany’s primary lending products are commercial mortgagesCRE, including multi-family loans, and commercial and industrialC&I loans. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets,and consumer assets, and commercial and residential real estate. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flowflows from operations of businesses. There are no significant concentrations of loans to any one industry or customer.commercial enterprises. The Bank’sCompany’s primary deposit products are checking, savings, and term deposit accounts.

accounts, all of which are insured by the FDIC under the maximum amounts allowed by law. In addition to traditional commercial banking products, the Company offers corporate cash management and retail banking services and is an established leader in BaaS through its Global Payments Group (“global payments business”). The Global Payments Group provides global payments infrastructure to its fintech partners, which includes serving as an issuing bank for third-party debit card programs nationwide and providing other financial infrastructure, including cash settlement and custodian deposit services. The Company has developed various deposit gathering strategies, which generate the funding necessary to operate without a large branch network. These activities, together with six strategically located banking centers, generate a stable source of deposits and a diverse loan portfolio with attractive risk-adjusted yields.

The Company is focused on organically growing and expanding its position in the New York metropolitan area.area and growing its business outside of New York through growth of its New York-based customers and their businesses as they expand in other states. Through an experienced team of commercial relationship managers and its integrated, client-centric approach, the BankCompany has successfully demonstrated its ability to consistently growgrown market share by deepening existing client relationships and continually expanding its client base through referrals. Since initiatingreferrals and the transitionability to a core-funded institution with the opening of its firstoffer alternatives to traditional retail banking center in 2006, the Bankproducts. The Company has maintained a goal of convertingconverted many of its commercial lending clients into full retail relationship banking clients. This deposit growth has been a result of the Bank’s diversified funding strategy, which affords it the opportunity to be a core funded and branch light institution. Deposits are primarily derived from three sources: existing lending relationships, non-borrowing clients usually sourced through banking centers and debit card issuing business. Additionally, part of the diversified strategy is growth in deposits through government or state directed fund deposits and cash management solutions provided to the cryptocurrency exchange customer. Given the size of the market in which the BankCompany operates and its differentiated approach to client service, there is significant opportunity to continuegrow its loan and deposits. By combining the high-tech service and relationship-based focus of a community bank with an extensive suite of financial products and services, the Company is well-positioned to continue to capitalize on the significant growth opportunities available in the New York metropolitan area.

Recent Events

In January 2023, the Company announced that it will fully exit the digital currency business, commonly referred to as the crypto-asset related business. This decision followed a careful review by the Board of Directors and management and reflected recent developments in the crypto-asset industry, material changes in the regulatory environment regarding banks’ involvement in digital currency business, and a strategic assessment of the business case for the Company’s further involvement at this time. The Company expects minimal financial impact from the exit of this business. The Company has four active institutional crypto-asset related clients where the Company’s activities are limited to providing debit card, payment, and account services.The Company has no loans outstanding to any of these clients, does not hold crypto-assets on its balance sheet and does not market or sell crypto-assets to its customers. The process of closing out the Company’s relationships with these clients in an orderly fashion has commenced and is expected to be completed during 2023. This determination will not affect customers’ existing ability to send funds to, or receive funds from, crypto-asset companies they choose to do business with, or the Company’s service to customers that do not have crypto-asset related activity as a principal line of business.

There are ongoing investigations by federal and state governmental entities concerning a prepaid debit card product program that was offered by the Company through an independent program manager. These include investigations as to which the Company is a subject by the FRB and certain state authorities, including the NYSDFS. During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, third parties used this prepaid debit card product to establish unauthorized accounts and to receive unauthorized government benefits payments, including unemployment insurance benefits payments made pursuant to the CARES Act from many states. The Company ceased accepting new accounts from this program manager in July of 2020 and has exited its relationship with this program manager. The Company is cooperating in these investigations and continues to review this matter. The foregoing could result in enforcement or other actions against the Company and the Bank including civil money penalties and remedial measures.

The Company is in discussions with the FRB and the NYSDFS with respect to consensual resolutions of their investigations. Although the Company is unable at this time to determine the final terms on which the FRB and NYSDFS investigations will be resolved or the timing of such resolutions, the Company accrued a charge of $35.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2022 to establish a reserve for what the Company believes is a reasonable estimate of the probable loss and expenses associated with the FRB and NYSDFS settlements. If final settlements with the FRB and the NYSDFS

41

are not reached and the FRB and the NYSDFS bring public enforcement actions, such actions and their resolution, as well as any other matter arising out of the foregoing program, could have a materially adverse effect on the Company and the Bank’s assets, business, cash flows, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and/or results of operations.

In the third quarter of 2022, the Company terminated its interest rate cap and monetized the gain on the derivative. In 2020, the Company had entered into an interest rate cap derivative contract as a part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The interest rate cap was designated as a cash flow hedge of certain deposit growth trajectory.

liabilities. The unrecognized value of $12.7 million at termination will be released from Accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded as a credit to Licensing fees expense through March 2025.

On March 15, 2022, the Company redeemed the entire $25.0 million principal balance, plus accrued interest, of its outstanding subordinated notes. The subordinated notes were scheduled to mature on March 15, 2027 and had an interest rate of 6.25% per annum.

Critical Accounting Policies

A summary of accounting policies is describedprovided in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Critical accounting estimates are necessary in the application of certain accounting policies and procedures and are particularly susceptible to significant change. Critical accounting policies are defined as those involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that could have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the Company’s most critical accounting policies,policy, which involveinvolves the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments, areis as follows:

Allowance for Loan Losses

The ALLL has been determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company is responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the ALLL. Management believes that the ALLL is adequate to cover specifically identifiable loan losses,

as well as estimated losses inherent in the Company’s portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.

Although management evaluates available information to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,ALLL, the level of allowancesallowance is an estimate which is subject to significant judgementjudgment and short termshort-term change. Because of uncertainties associated with local and national economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, collateral values and future cash flows onfrom the loan portfolio, it is reasonably possible that a material change could occur in the allowance for loan lossesALLL in the near term due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Company’s control. However, the amount of the change that is reasonably possible cannot be estimated.term. The evaluation of the adequacy of loan collateral is often based upon estimates and appraisals. Because of changing economic conditions, the valuations determined from such estimates and appraisals may also change. Accordingly, the Company may ultimately incur losses that vary from management’s current estimates. Adjustments to the allowance for loan lossesALLL will be reported in the period in which such adjustments become known orand can be reasonably estimated. All loan losses are charged to the allowance for loan lossesALLL when the loss actually occurs or when the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Recoveries are credited to the allowance at the time of recovery.

Emerging Growth In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s ALLL. As a result of such examinations, the Company
Pursuant may need to recognize additions to the JOBS Act, an EGC is providedALLL based on the optionregulators’ judgments about information available to adopt new or revised accounting standards that may be issued bythem at the FASB ortime of such examination.

For further discussion of the SEC either (i) within the same periods as those otherwise

45

applicable to non-EGCs or (ii) within the same time periods as private companies. ALLL, see “Business – Asset Quality – Allowance for Loan Losses.”

The Company elected delayedadopted ASU No. 2016 13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (ASC 326) effective datesJanuary 1, 2023, which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date be based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Accounting Matters – The FASB issued an accounting standard update that will result in a significant change in how the Company recognizes credit losses, which may have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.”

42

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

For a discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting standard. As permittedstandards, please see “NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

Selected Financial Information

The following table includes selected financial information for the Company for the periods indicated:

At or for the year ended December 31, 

 

2022

    

2021

    

2020

 

Performance Ratios

  

 

  

 

  

Return on average assets

0.90

%  

1.06

%  

1.02

%

Return on average equity

10.27

 

14.65

 

12.31

Net interest spread (1)

2.82

 

2.41

 

2.83

Net interest margin (2)

3.49

 

2.77

 

3.26

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities

238.26

 

224.81

 

189.28

Non-interest expense/average assets

2.25

 

1.53

 

1.93

Efficiency ratio

58.16

 

48.32

 

52.51

Average equity to average total assets

8.74

 

7.22

 

8.30

Earnings per Share

  

 

  

 

  

Basic earnings per common share

$

5.42

$

6.64

$

4.76

Diluted earnings per common share

5.29

6.45

4.66

  

 

  

 

  

(1)Determined by subtracting the weighted average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities from the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets.
(2)Determined by dividing net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.

Discussion of Financial Condition

The Company had total assets of $6.3 billion at December 31, 2022, a decrease of 11.9% from December 31, 2021.

Total cash and cash equivalents were $257.4 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $2.1 billion, or 89.1%, from December 31, 2021. The decrease reflected the $1.1 billion deployment of cash into loans and securities and the $1.2 billion outflow of deposits.

Investments

Total securities were $958.2 million at December 31, 2022, an increase of 0.8% from December 31, 2021. The change reflects the $207.4 million purchase of AFS and HTM securities, which was partially offset by JOBS Act, so long asthe $121.4 million paydown of AFS and HTM securities and the $76.9 million increase in unrealized losses on AFS securities reflecting the prevailing interest rate environment.

The following table sets forth the stated maturities and weighted average yields of investment securities, excluding equity securities, at December 31, 2022. The table does not include the effect of prepayments or scheduled principal amortization. The weighted average yield for each group of securities was weighted by the amortized cost of the securities in the group.  Tax-exempt securities, if any, were presented on a tax-equivalent basis, using a federal tax rate of 21%.

43

Due Within

Due After 1 

Due After 5

Due After

1 Year

Through 5 Years

Through 10 Years

10 Years

Total

Amortized

Amortized

Amortized

Amortized

Amortized

Fair

(dollars in thousands)

    

Cost

    

Yield

    

Cost

    

Yield

    

Cost

    

Yield

Cost

Yield

    

Cost

    

Value

Yield

Available-for-sale

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

  

 

  

 

U.S. Government agency securities

$

 

%  

$

52,996

 

0.63

%  

$

10,000

 

1.10

%  

$

5,000

1.68

%  

$

67,996

$

59,372

0.78

%  

U.S. State and Municipal securities

11,649

1.87

11,649

9,212

1.87

Residential MBS

 

1,740

 

1.84

8,270

 

1.72

403,988

1.49

413,998

338,548

1.49

Commercial MBS

 

 

 

 

1.43

 

17,773

 

3.50

 

19,296

2.93

 

37,069

 

34,850

3.20

Asset-backed securities

3,953

5.34

3,953

3,765

5.34

Total

$

 

%  

$

54,736

 

0.67

%  

$

36,043

 

2.42

%  

$

443,886

 

1.60

%  

$

534,665

$

445,747

1.56

%  

Held-to-maturity

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

U.S. Treasury securities

$

%  

$

29,852

1.03

%  

$

%  

$

%  

$

29,852

$

27,629

1.03

%  

U.S. State and Municipal securities

15,814

2.19

15,814

13,205

2.19

Residential MBS

 

 

1,394

 

1.90

455,254

1.93

 

456,648

 

389,621

1.93

Commercial MBS

 

 

8,111

 

1.39

8,111

 

6,835

1.39

Total

$

 

%  

$

29,852

 

1.03

%  

$

9,505

 

1.46

%  

$

471,068

 

1.94

%  

$

510,425

$

437,290

1.88

%  

There were $25.0 million and $0.0 securities pledged to the FRBNY discount window at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company’s securities portfolio primarily consisted of investment grade mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by government agencies.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

Each reporting period, the Company evaluates its AFS and HTM securities with a decline in fair value below the amortized cost of the investment to determine whether or not the impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. OTTI is required to be recognized if: (1) the Company intends to sell the security; (2) it qualifies as an EGC,is more likely than not that the Company will take advantagebe required to sell the security before recovery of someits amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. For impaired securities that the Company intends to sell, or more likely than not will be required to sell, the full amount of the reduced regulatoryimpairment is recognized as OTTI, resulting in a realized loss that is charged to earnings through a reduction in non-interest income. For all other impaired debt securities, credit-related OTTI is recognized through earnings and reporting requirementsnon-credit related OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive income/loss, net of applicable taxes.

The unrealized losses of securities at December 31, 2022 and 2021 were primarily due to the changes in market interest rates subsequent to purchase. The Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired since the decline in market value was attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality. In addition, the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell these investments until there is a full recovery of the unrealized loss, which may be at maturity. As a result, no impairment loss was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2022 or 2021.

44

Loans

Loans are the Company’s primary interest-earning asset.

Loan Portfolio

Total loans, net of deferred fees and unamortized costs, were $4.8 billion at December 31, 2022, an increase of 29.7% from December 31, 2021. The increase primarily included increases of $895.1 million in CRE loans (including owner occupied) and $262.1 million in C&I loans. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company’s loan production was $1.8 billion, as compared to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, total loans consisted primarily of CRE, including multi-family mortgage loans, and C&I. At December 31, 2022, the Company’s loan portfolio includes loans to the following industries (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 2022

% of Total

Balance

Loans(1)

CRE (2)

 

  

 

  

Skilled Nursing Facilities

 

$

1,216,902

 

25.14

%

Multi-family

468,540

9.68

Retail

330,164

6.82

Mixed use

356,880

7.37

Office

387,591

8.01

Hospitality

189,609

3.92

Construction

143,693

2.97

Other

764,678

15.80

Total CRE

$

3,858,057

79.71

%

C&I (3)

Healthcare

$

100,170

2.07

%

Skilled Nursing Facilities

 

119,206

2.46

Finance & Insurance

229,262

4.74

Wholesale

48,868

1.01

Manufacturing

53,260

1.10

Other

354,215

7.32

Total C&I

$

904,981

18.70

%

(1)

Net of deferred fees and costs

(2)

CRE, not including one-to four-family loans and participations

(3)

Excluding premiums and overdraft adjustments

The largest concentration in the loan portfolio is to the healthcare industry, which amounted to $1.4 billion, or 29.7% of total loans, at December 31, 2022, including $1.3 billion in loans to skilled nursing facilities (“SNF”).

45

The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2022 regarding the amount of contractual loan maturities during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments that significantly shorten the average loan life and may cause actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below (in thousands).

Commercial

One-to Four-

Commercial

Consumer

 

    

Real Estate

    

Construction

    

Multi-family

    

Family

    

and Industrial

Loans

 

Total

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Due within 1 year

$

811,733

$

89,820

$

72,144

$

$

199,597

$

416

$

1,173,710

After 1 year through 5 years

 

2,093,162

 

53,873

 

296,125

 

1,841

 

620,760

 

2,521

 

3,068,282

After 5 years though 15 years

 

349,613

 

 

100,271

 

48,728

 

88,259

 

21,746

 

608,617

After 15 years

2,638

248

2,886

Total

$

3,254,508

$

143,693

$

468,540

$

53,207

$

908,616

$

24,931

$

4,853,495

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of loans at December 31, 2022 that are availabledue after one year and have either fixed interest rates or floating interest rates (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 2022

Fixed

Floating

Rate

Rate

 

Loans

 

Loans

 

Total

Real Estate

 

  

 

  

 

  

Commercial

$

1,790,159

 

$

652,616

 

$

2,442,775

Construction

 

20,090

 

 

33,783

 

 

53,873

Multi-family

 

343,417

 

 

52,979

 

 

396,396

One-to four-family

 

49,916

 

 

3,291

 

 

53,207

Commercial and industrial

 

439,624

 

 

269,395

 

 

709,019

Consumer

 

8,082

 

 

16,433

 

 

24,515

Total

$

2,651,288

 

$

1,028,497

 

$

3,679,785

Asset Quality

Non-performing loans decreased to it, including, but not limited$24,000 at December 31, 2022 from $10.3 million at December 31, 2021, primarily due to not being requiredthe payoff of one CRE loan, which was adversely affected by COVID-19. The table below sets forth key asset quality ratios:

At or for the year ended December 31, 

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Asset Quality Ratios

Non-performing loans to total loans

%  

0.28

%  

0.20

%  

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

0.93

 

0.93

 

1.13

Non-performing loans to total assets

 

0.14

 

0.15

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans

N.M

337.6

554.2

Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans

N.M

346.6

630.0

Non-accrual loans to total loans

0.27

0.18

Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding in aggregate

0.13

0.01

46

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to complyabsorb probable incurred losses on existing loans. The allowance is established based on management’s evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in the Company’s portfolio in accordance with GAAP. In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (ASC 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the CECL model. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2023. See “NOTE 3 ‒ SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

The ALLL is increased through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. Loans are charged against the ALLL when management believes that the collectability of all or a portion of the principal is unlikely. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the ALLL is performed on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration such factors as general economic conditions, the credit risk grade assigned to the loan, historical loan loss experience and review of specific impaired loans.

The ALLL was $44.9 million at December 31, 2022, as compared to $34.7 million at December 31, 2021. The ratio of ALLL to total loans was 0.93% at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The increase in the ALLL was primarily due to loan growth.

The following table sets forth the ALLL allocated by loan category for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 

2022

2021

% of

% of

% of

Loans in

 

% of

 

Loans in

 

Allowance

 

Category

Allowance

Category

Allowance

to Total

to Total

Allowance

to Total

 

to Total

    

Amount

    

Allowance

    

Loans

    

Amount

    

Allowance

    

Loans

    

Real Estate

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Commercial

$

29,496

 

65.8

%  

67.0

%  

22,216

 

64.0

%  

66.5

%  

Construction

 

1,983

 

4.4

 

3.0

2,105

 

6.1

 

4.1

Multi-family

 

2,823

 

6.3

 

9.7

 

2,156

 

6.2

 

9.5

One-to four-family

 

105

 

0.2

 

1.1

 

140

 

0.4

 

1.5

Commercial and industrial

 

10,274

 

22.9

 

18.7

 

7,708

 

22.2

 

17.5

Consumer

 

195

0.4

0.5

404

1.1

0.9

Total

$

44,876

 

100.0

%  

100.0

%  

$

34,729

 

100.0

%  

100.0

%  

Goodwill

The Company performed an impairment assessment and determined that no impairment of goodwill existed as of October 1, 2022. The Company changed its annual goodwill impairment testing date from December 31 to October 1 to better align with the auditor attestation requirementstiming of Section 404(b)its annual planning process. See “NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION - Goodwill” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

Other Assets

Other assets were $148.3 million at December 31, 2022, an increase of $91.4 million from December 31, 2021. The increase was due primarily to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 Leases (ASC 842), and the recognition of deferred tax assets related to the unrealized losses on AFS securities. See “NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K regarding the adoption of ASC 842.

47

Deposits

Total deposits were $5.3 billion at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $1.2 billion, or 18.0%, from December 31, 2021. The decrease in deposits was primarily due to a decrease of $1.0 billion in digital currency business deposits and $789.7 million in bankruptcy trustee and property manager deposits, partially offset by an aggregate net increase of $658.3 million in all other deposit verticals. The decrease in digital currency business deposits reflects the Company’s decision to fully exit the crypto-asset related vertical in light of recent developments in the crypto-asset industry and material changes in the regulatory environment regarding banks’ involvement in crypto-asset related businesses. Non-interest-bearing demand deposits were 45.9% of total deposits at December 31, 2022, compared to 57.0% at December 31, 2021.

The tables below summarize the Company’s deposit composition by segment for the periods indicated, and the dollar and percent change from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 

    

    

Percentage

    

    

Percentage

of total

of total

2022

balance

2021

balance

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

$

2,422,151

 

45.9

%  

$

3,668,673

 

57.0

%  

Money market

 

2,792,554

 

52.9

 

2,666,983

 

41.5

Savings accounts

 

11,144

 

0.2

 

20,930

 

0.3

Time deposits

 

52,063

 

1.0

 

78,986

 

1.2

Total

$

5,277,912

 

100.0

%  

$

6,435,572

 

100.0

%  

2022 vs. 2021

2022 vs. 2021

dollar

percentage 

 

Change

 

Change

 

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

$

(1,246,522)

 

(34.0)

%  

Money market

 

125,571

 

4.7

Savings accounts

 

(9,786)

 

(46.8)

Time deposits

 

(26,923)

 

(34.1)

Total

$

(1,157,660)

 

(18.0)

%  

The table below summarizes the Company’s average balances and average interest rate paid, by segment, for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 

Average

Average

2022

Rate

2021

Rate

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

$

3,223,606

 

%  

$

2,708,547

 

%  

Money market

 

2,634,055

 

1.08

 

2,375,525

 

0.56

Savings accounts

 

18,446

 

0.21

 

19,091

 

0.23

Time deposits

 

59,645

 

0.99

 

83,313

 

1.02

Total

$

5,935,752

 

$

5,186,476

 

At December 31, 2022, the aggregate amount of uninsured deposits (deposits in amounts greater than $250,000, which is the maximum amount for federal deposit insurance) was $2.2 billion. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the aggregate

48

amount of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation,Company’s uninsured time deposits was $30.8 million. The following are scheduled maturities of time deposits greater than $250,000 as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

At December 31, 2022

Three months or less

$

4,452

Over three months through six months

 

10,004

Over six months through one year

 

9,048

Over one year

 

7,255

Total

$

30,759

Borrowings

Federal Funds Purchased and exemptionsFHLB Advances

To support a more efficient balance sheet, particularly related to the decrease in deposits related to the exit of the digital currency business, the Company may at times utilize FHLB advances or other funding sources. At December 31, 2022, the Company had $150.0 million of Federal funds purchased and $100.0 million of FHLBNY advances. At December 31, 2021, the Company had no Federal funds purchased and no FHLBNY advances. At December 31, 2022, the Company had available borrowing capacity of $984.4 million at the FHLBNY, and available borrowing capacity of $137.6 million at the FRBNY discount window.

Trust Preferred Securities Payable

On December 7, 2005, the Company established MetBank Capital Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust I”). The Company owns all of the common stock of Trust I in exchange for contributed capital of $310,000. Trust I issued $10.0 million of preferred capital securities to investors in a private transaction and invested the proceeds, combined with the proceeds from the requirementssale of holding non-binding advisory votesTrust I’s common capital securities, in the Company through the purchase of $10.3 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”) issued by the Company. The Debentures, the sole assets of Trust I, mature on executive compensationDecember 9, 2035 and golden parachute payments.bear interest at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 1.85%. The Debentures are callable at any time. At December 31, 2022, the Debentures bore an interest rate of 5.93%.

On July 14, 2006, the Company established MetBank Capital Trust II, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust II”). The Company owns all of the common stock of Trust II in exchange for contributed capital of $310,000. Trust II issued $10.0 million of preferred capital securities to investors in a private transaction and invested the proceeds, combined with the proceeds from the sale of Trust II’s common capital securities, in the Company through the purchase of $10.3 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures II”) issued by the Company. The Debentures II, the sole assets of Trust II, mature on October 7, 2036, and bear interest at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.00%. The Debentures II are callable at any time. At December 31, 2022, the Debentures II bore an interest rate of 6.08%.

The terms of the trust preferred securities will be impacted by the transition from LIBOR to an alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rate, potentially the SOFR, in 2023. The overnight and 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month USD LIBOR settings will cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. All other LIBOR settings ceased to be published or to be representative as of December 31, 2021. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the transition on the trust preferred securities payable.

Subordinated Notes Payable

On March 15, 2022, the Company redeemed the entire $25.0 million principal balance, plus accrued interest, of its outstanding subordinated notes. The subordinated notes were scheduled to mature on March 15, 2027 and had an interest rate of 6.25% per annum.

49

Secured Borrowings

The Company has loan participation agreements with counterparties. The Company is generally the servicer for these loans. If the transfer of the participation interest does not qualify for sale treatment under GAAP, the amount of the loan transferred is recorded as a secured borrowing. There were $7.7 million in secured borrowings as of December 31, 2022 and $32.5 million as of December 31, 2021.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, was $54.3 million, at December 31, 2022 an increase of $46.8 million from December 31, 2021. The increase was due to the prevailing interest rate environment, which increased the unrealized losses on AFS securities, partially offset by the increases in unrealized gains on cash flow hedges prior to their termination in the third quarter of 2022.

In 2020, the Company entered into an interest rate cap derivative contract as a part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The interest rate cap was designated as a cash flow hedge of certain deposit liabilities. In the third quarter of 2022, the Company terminated the interest rate cap and monetized the gain on the derivative. The unrecognized value of $12.7 million at termination will be released from Accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded as a credit to Licensing fees expense through March 2025.

Discussion onof the Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Net Income
For the year ended December 31, 2017, net2022

Net Income

Net income was $12.4 million, an increase of  $7.4 million or 146.7% from $5.0$59.4 million for 2022 as compared to $60.6 million for 2021. The $1.2 million decrease primarily reflects a $35.0 million regulatory settlement reserve, a $11.4 million increase in compensation and benefits, a $7.7 million increase in professional fees, a $6.3 million increase in the year ended December 31, 2016. Theprovision for loan losses, and $8.5 million increase was due to anincome tax expense, partially offset by a $72.2 million increase in net interest income after provision for loan losses of  $15.0 million, primarily driven by higher volume of loans combined with higher yield on loans, and an increase in non-interest income of  $5.9 million, primarily driven by an increase in service charges and fees. These increases were offset by an increase of  $5.4 million in non-interest expense, driven by the growth of the business, and an increase of  $8.2 million in income tax expense, which is a result of higher pretax net income in 2017 and a one-time U.S. tax expense of  $1.6 million resulting from the Tax Act, which the U.S. government enacted on December 22, 2017.

Net income increased $744,000, or 17.4%, to $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due to an increase in net interest income and debit card income. The increase in net interest income was caused by an increase in interest and fees on loans, which increased $11.3 million, or 36.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was due to the Bank’s continued success in growing its loans.
46

Net Interest Income Analysis

and Net Interest Margin

Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets and interest incurred on liabilities. The following table presents an analysis of net interest income by each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities forliabilities. The table presents the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):

For the Year ended December 31,
201720162015
Average
Outstanding
Balance
InterestYield/​
Rate
Average
Outstanding
Balance
InterestYield/​
Rate
Average
Outstanding
Balance
InterestYield/​
Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Loans$1,244,194$57,0754.59%$931,207$42,3604.56%$704,080$31,1104.42%
Available-for-sale securities35,0857202.0541,8367951.9052,4029991.91
Held-to-maturity securities5,9631232.066,2151211.952,551562.20
Other interest-earning assets195,8052,8351.4585,1868791.0365,2305170.79
Total interest-earning assets1,481,04760,7534.101,064,44444,1554.16824,26332,6823.97
Noninterest-earning assets58,47743,91837,217
Allowance for loan losses(15,322)(11,131)(8,706)
Total assets$1,524,202$1,097,231$852,774
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market and savings accounts$561,733$4,8400.86%$501,619$3,6740.73%$395,878$2,6790.68%
Certificates of deposit80,1301,0331.29101,9501,2031.18109,9211,1261.02
Total interest-bearing deposits641,8635,8730.91603,5694,8770.80505,7993,8050.75
Borrowed funds105,6842,7982.6169,8401,2121.7479,0061,4551.84
Total interest-bearing liabilities747,5478,6711.16673,4096,0890.90584,8055,2600.90
Noninterest-bearing deposits607,743313,594183,901
Other non-interest bearing liabilities35,45020,02215,319
Total liabilities1,390,7401,007,025784,025
Equity133,46290,20668,749
Total liabilities and equity$1,524,202$1,097,231$852,774
Net interest income$52,082$38,066$27,422
Net interest rate spread(1)
2.94%3.26%3.07%
Net interest-earning assets(2)
$733,500$391,035$239,458
Net interest margin(3)
3.54%3.57%3.36%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities198.12%158.74%139.52%
(1)
Represents the difference between theaverage yield on average interest-earning assets and the average cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
(2)
Represents total Yields and costs were derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets less totaland interest-bearing liabilities.liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. Average balances were derived from daily balances over the periods indicated. Interest income included fees that management considers to be adjustments to yields. Yields on tax-exempt obligations were not computed on a tax-equivalent basis. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred loan origination fees and costs, and purchase discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income.

50

(3)
Represents net interest income divided by total interest-earning assets.

Year Ended

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

 

December 31, 2020

 

    

Average

    

    

    

Average

    

    

 

Average

    

    

 

Outstanding

Yield /

Outstanding

Yield /

 

Outstanding

Yield /

 

(dollars in thousands)

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

 

Balance

Interest

Rate

 

Assets:

Interest-earning assets:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

Loans (1)

$

4,361,412

$

231,851

 

5.32

%  

$

3,448,468

$

164,528

 

4.77

%

$

2,888,180

$

136,497

 

4.73

%

Available-for-sale securities

 

538,425

 

6,921

 

1.29

 

489,922

 

5,066

 

1.03

 

192,472

 

3,108

 

1.59

Held-to-maturity securities

 

495,812

 

8,682

 

1.75

 

50,110

 

746

 

1.49

 

3,282

 

59

 

1.77

Equity investments - non-trading

2,339

32

1.37

2,312

26

1.13

2,279

41

1.77

Overnight deposits

 

1,156,468

 

12,314

 

1.05

 

1,669,754

 

2,310

 

0.14

 

732,130

 

2,546

 

0.35

Other interest-earning assets

 

16,700

 

939

 

5.62

 

11,897

 

608

 

5.11

 

16,467

 

846

 

5.14

Total interest-earning assets

 

6,571,156

 

260,739

 

3.97

 

5,672,463

 

173,284

 

3.05

 

3,834,810

 

143,097

 

3.73

Non-interest-earning assets

 

90,495

 

  

 

  

 

89,002

 

  

 

  

 

59,584

 

  

 

  

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 

(40,020)

 

  

 

  

 

(37,235)

 

  

 

  

 

(31,381)

 

  

 

  

Total assets

$

6,621,631

 

  

 

  

$

5,724,230

 

  

 

  

$

3,863,013

 

  

 

  

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Money market and savings accounts

$

2,652,502

28,694

 

1.08

$

2,394,616

13,392

 

0.56

$

1,798,109

12,420

 

0.69

Certificates of deposit

 

59,645

 

590

 

0.99

 

83,313

 

849

 

1.02

 

98,483

 

1,824

 

1.85

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

2,712,147

 

29,284

 

1.08

 

2,477,929

 

14,241

 

0.57

 

1,896,592

 

14,244

 

0.75

Borrowed funds

 

45,878

 

2,297

 

5.00

 

45,303

 

2,042

 

4.51

 

129,460

 

3,932

 

2.99

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

2,758,025

 

31,581

 

1.15

 

2,523,232

 

16,283

 

0.65

 

2,026,052

 

18,176

 

0.90

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Non-interest-bearing deposits

 

3,223,606

 

  

 

  

 

2,708,547

 

  

 

  

 

1,443,094

 

  

 

  

Other non-interest-bearing liabilities

 

61,213

 

  

 

  

 

79,239

 

  

 

  

 

73,250

 

  

 

  

Total liabilities

 

6,042,844

 

  

 

  

 

5,311,018

 

  

 

  

 

3,542,396

 

  

 

  

Stockholders' equity

 

578,787

 

  

 

  

 

413,212

 

  

 

  

 

320,617

 

  

 

  

Total liabilities and equity

$

6,621,631

 

  

 

  

$

5,724,230

 

  

 

  

$

3,863,013

 

  

 

  

Net interest income

 

  

$

229,158

 

  

 

  

$

157,001

 

  

 

  

$

124,921

 

  

Net interest rate spread (2)

 

  

 

  

 

2.82

%  

 

  

 

  

 

2.41

%

 

  

 

  

 

2.83

%

Net interest margin (3)

 

�� 

 

  

 

3.49

%  

 

  

 

  

 

2.77

%

 

  

 

  

 

3.26

%

Total cost of deposits (4)

 

  

 

  

 

0.49

%  

 

  

 

  

 

0.27

%

 

  

 

  

 

0.43

%

Total cost of funds (5)

 

  

 

  

 

0.53

%  

  

 

  

 

0.31

%

  

 

  

 

0.52

%

(1)

Amount includes deferred loan fees and non-performing loans.

(2)

Determined by subtracting the annualized average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities from the annualized average yield on total interest earning assets.

(3)

Determined by dividing net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.

(4)

Determined by dividing interest expense on deposits by total average interest-bearing and non-interest bearing deposits.

(5)

Determined by dividing interest expense by the sum of total average interest-bearing liabilities and total average non-interest-bearing deposits.

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on net interest income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume

47

(changes (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of

51

this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume. Dollars are in thousands.

At December 31,
2017 over 20162016 over 2015
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
VolumeRateVolumeRate
Interest-earning assets:
Loans$14,457$258$14,715$10,235$1,017$11,252
Available-for-sale securities(82)(40)(122)(213)9(204)
Held-to-maturity securities(2)42
Other interest-earning assets1,5025012,003216209425
Total interest-earning assets$15,875$723$16,598$10,238$1,235$11,473
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market and savings accounts$469$697$1,166$760$235$995
Certificates of deposit(299)129(170)(71)14877
Total deposits1708269966893831,072
FHLB Advances8037831,586(164)(79)(243)
Total interest-bearing liabilities9731,6092,582525304829
Change in net interest income$14,902$(886)$14,016$9,713$931$10,644
For the year ended December 31, 2017, net interest income was $52.1 million, an increase of $14.0 million, or 36.8%, compared to $38.1 million in 2016. The increase in net interest income is mainly attributable to higher volume of loans, combined with higher yield on loans, partially offset by a $2.6 million increase in interest expense. The increase in interest expense was primarily driven by the interest on subordinated debt issued in March 2017. At December 31, 2017 total average interest-earning assets increased by $416.6 million and total average interest bearing liabilities increased by $74.1 million. (in thousands).

At December 31, 

2022 over 2021

2021 over 2020

Increase (Decrease)

Total

Increase (Decrease)

Total

Due to

Increase

Due to

Increase

    

Volume

    

Rate

    

(Decrease)

    

Volume

    

Rate

    

(Decrease)

Interest-earning assets:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Loans

$

47,033

$

20,290

$

67,323

$

26,720

$

1,311

$

28,031

Available-for-sale securities

 

537

 

1,318

 

1,855

 

3,338

 

(1,380)

 

1,958

Held-to-maturity securities

 

7,781

 

155

 

7,936

 

697

 

(10)

 

687

Equity investments

6

6

1

(16)

(15)

Overnight deposits

(911)

10,915

10,004

1,925

(2,161)

(236)

Other interest-earning assets

 

265

 

66

 

331

 

(234)

 

(4)

 

(238)

Total interest-earning assets

$

54,705

$

32,750

$

87,455

$

32,447

$

(2,260)

$

30,187

Interest-bearing liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Money market and savings accounts

$

1,581

$

13,721

$

15,302

$

3,622

$

(2,650)

$

972

Certificates of deposit

 

(235)

 

(24)

 

(259)

 

(249)

 

(726)

 

(975)

Total deposits

 

1,346

 

13,697

 

15,043

 

3,373

 

(3,376)

 

(3)

Borrowed funds

 

27

 

228

 

255

 

(3,269)

 

1,379

 

(1,890)

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

1,373

 

13,925

 

15,298

 

104

 

(1,997)

 

(1,893)

Change in net interest income

$

53,332

$

18,825

$

72,157

$

32,343

$

(263)

$

32,080

Net interest rate spread decreased by 32margin increased 72 basis points to 2.94%3.49% for the year ended December 31, 20172022 from 3.26%2.77% for the year ended December 31, 2016, while net interest margin decreased 3 basis point to 3.54% in the year ended December 31, 2017 from 3.57% in 2016.

Net interest income increased $10.6 million, or 38.8%, to $38.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $27.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net interest income is mainly attributable to higher volume of loans, combined with higher yield on loans. Total average interest earning assets increased2021 driven largely by $240.2 million, which was offset by an increase of  $88.6 million in total interest bearing liabilities. Net interest rate spread increased 19 basis points to 3.26% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 3.07% for the year ended December 31, 2015, while net interest margin increased 21 basis points to 3.57% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 3.36% for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Interest Income
Interest income increased $16.6 million, or 37.6%, to $60.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $44.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This was attributable, primarily, to an increase in income from interest and fees on loans, which increased $14.7 million, or 34.7%, to $57.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $42.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in interest income on loans was due to an increase in average balance of loans of  $313.0 million, or 33.6%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $931.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was due to the Bank’s continued success in loan growth.
Interest income increased $11.5 million, or 35.1%, to $44.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $32.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This was attributable to an increase in
48

interest and fees on loans, which increased $11.3 million, or 36.1%, to $42.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in interest income on loans was due to an increase in average balance of loans of  $227.1 million, or 32.3%, to $931.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $704.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase was due to the Bank’s continued success in loan growth.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $2.6 million, or 42.4%, to $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, caused by an increase in the average balance of interest bearing deposits. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits increased eleven basis points to 0.91% forloans and the year ended December 31, 2017 from 0.80% forincrease in loan and overnight deposit yields partially offset by the year ended December 31, 2016. Thedecrease in the average balance of overnight deposits and a higher cost of funds.

Total cost of funds for 2022 was 53 basis points compared to 31 basis points for 2021, which reflects the increase in prevailing interest bearing depositsrates and competition for deposits.

Interest Income

Interest income increased $38.3$87.5 million or 6.3%, to $641.9$260.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $603.62022, as compared to $173.3 million for 2021. The increase from the prior year ended December 31, 2016.

Interest expense increased $829,000, or 15.8%,was primarily due to $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, caused by an$1.4 billion increase in the average balance of interest bearing deposits. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits increased 5loans and securities, and the 55 basis point and 91 basis point increases in average yield for loans and overnight deposits, respectively. The increase in average yields on loans and overnight deposits reflects the increase in prevailing interest rates on existing floating rate loans and overnight deposits, as well as higher yields on new loan production.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $15.3 million to 0.80% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 0.75% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The average balance of interest bearing deposits increased $97.8 million, or 19.3%, to $603.6$31.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $505.82022, as compared to $16.3 million for 2021. The increase from the prior year ended December 31, 2015.

was primarily due to the 52 basis point increases in average yield for money market and savings accounts, which reflects the increase in prevailing interest rates and competition for deposits.

Provision for loan losses

For the year ended December 31, 2017,Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $7.1increased $6.3 million to $10.1 million for 2022, as compared to $8.1$3.8 million in 2016, a decrease of  $1.0for 2021, which reflected loan growth.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income increased by $2.9 million or 12.4%. The provisions recorded resulted in the allowanceto $26.6 million for loan losses of  $14.9 million, or 1.05% of total loans at December 31, 2017,2022, as compared to $11.8 million, or 1.12% of total loans at December 31, 2016. Provision for loan losses decreased, primarily, as the result of better asset quality and lower charge-offs of  $4.0 million the year ended December 31, 2017, including a $3.7 million charge off related to the Bank’s taxi medallion portfolio, when compared to loans-charged off for the year ended December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, there was a balance of  $1.2 million in the Bank’s taxi medallion portfolio.

Provision for loan losses was $8.1$23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The provisions recorded resulted in an allowance for loan losses of  $11.8 million, or 1.12% of total loans at December 31, 2016, compared to $9.9 million, or 1.21% of total loans at December 31, 2015. Provision for loan losses increased primarily as the result of $6.2 million in loans charged-off for the year ended December 31, 2016, including a $5.1 million charge off related to the Bank’s taxi medallion portfolio.
For additional information about the provision for loan losses, see the discussion of asset quality and the allowance for loan losses later in this report, as well as in Note 3 in this report.
Non-Interest Income
For the year ended December 31, 2017, non-interest income was $11.3 million, an increase of $5.9 million or 108.4%, when compared to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2021. The increase was driven primarily by increases in Global Payments Group revenue from higher fintech BaaS transactions.

52

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense increased $61.4 million to $148.7 million for 2022 as compared to $87.3 million for 2021. The increase was driven by the $35.0 million regulatory settlement reserve and increases in compensation and benefits and professional fees. There are ongoing investigations by federal and state governmental entities concerning a prepaid debit card product program that was offered by the Company through an independent program manager. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Events.

Compensation and benefits increased $11.4 million to $57.3 million for 2022 as compared to $45.9 million for 2021. This increase was due to $2.5 million increase in fees charged on money market accounts (included in service charges on deposit accounts) dueprimarily to an increase in the volume of ACH/wire transfer activities,total compensation in line with revenue growth and a $3.5 millionthe increase in foreign exchange conversionthe number of full-time employees to 239 for 2022, as compared to 202 for 2021.

Professional fees (included in other service charges and fees).

Non-interest income increased $925 thousand, or 20.6%,$7.7 million to $5.4$14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $4.52022 as compared to $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in non-interest income was primarily from growth in debit card business. Debit card income increased by $358 thousand or 13.9% to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Customer related fees and service charges (including service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges and fees and loan prepayment penalties) also increased $527 thousand or 27.3% to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
49

Non-Interest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2017, non-interest expense was $32.7 million, an increase of $5.4 million or 19.6%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily driven by increases in professional fees of  $1.0 million, core processing fees and other expenses of $1.2 million, and salaries and employee benefits of  $2.2 million; all of which correspond with the growth in non-interest income for 2017.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, non-interest expense was $27.4 million, an increase of $4.3 million or 18.6%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily driven by increases in salaries and employee benefits of  $3.8 million.
Discussion of Financial Condition
The Company’s total assets were $1.76 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of  $539.56 million from $1.22 billion at December 31, 2016. The increase was2021, primarily due to an increase in net loans of $362.28legal fees related to regulatory matters.

Income Tax Expense

The effective tax rate for 2022 was 38.7% compared to 32.4% for 2021. The effective tax rate increased due to the $35.0 million an increase in cash and cash equivalents of  $178.30 million, and an increase in other investments and assets of  $5.22 million. These increases wereregulatory settlement reserve, partially offset by a decrease in investment securities available-for-sale and held-for-maturity of  $6.24 million.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents increased $178.30 millionother discrete tax items. The other discrete items related to $261.23 million at December 31, 2017 from $82.93 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in cash and cash equivalents resulted primarily from the IPO of the Company’s common stock, and an increase in demand deposits and the subordinated debt issuance during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Investments
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
At December 31,
201720162015
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed securities$24,856$24,684$29,152$29,027$39,679$39,794
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations2,8092,7065,2335,1034,5604,449
Commercial mortgage backed by government sponsored agencies1,5811,550
Municipal bond1,0981,1091,1221,1361,1451,174
CRA mutual fund2,1602,1082,1152,0632,0682,050
Total securities available-for-sale$32,504$32,157$37,622$37,329$47,452$47,467
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities$5,403$5,305$6,475$6,394$4,877$4,873
Foreign government securities252525259797
Total securities held-to-maturity$5,428$5,330$6,500$6,419$4,974$4,970
50

The following table sets forth the stated maturities and weighted average yields of investment securities at December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands).
One Year or LessMore than One Year
to Five Years
More than Five
to Ten Years
More than
Ten Years
Total
Amortized
Cost
Weighted
Average
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Weighted
Average
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Weighted
Average
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Weighted
Average
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Weighted
Average
Yield
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed securities$%$%$14,2272.31%$10,6292.05%$24,856$24,6842.20%
Residential collateralized mortgage
obligations
2,8091.472,8092,7061.47
Commercial mortgage backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies 1,5811.471,5811,5501.47
Municipal bond1,0983.941,0981,1093.94
CRA mutual fund(1)
2,1602,1082.27
Total securities available-for-sale$$1,5811.47%$17,0362.17%$11,7272.23%$32,504$32,1572.10%
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities$%$%$%$5,4032.06%$5,403$5,3052.06%
Foreign government securities251.8325251.83
Total securities held-to-maturity$%$251.83%$%$5,4032.06%$5,428$5,3302.06%
(1)
CRA mutual funds do not have a stated maturity.
At December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s securities portfolio primarily consisted of investment grade mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by government agencies.
Other-than-temporary Impairment
Each reporting period, the Bank evaluates all securities with a decline in fair value below the amortized cost of the investment to determine whether or not the impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. Other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) is required to be recognized if  (1) it intends to sell the security; (2) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) for debt securities, the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. Marketable equity securities are evaluated for OTTI based on the severity and duration of the impairment and, if deemed to be other than temporary, the declines in fair value are reflected in earnings as realized losses. For impaired debt securities that the Bank intends to sell, or more likely than not will be required to sell, the full amount of the depreciation is recognized as OTTI, resulting in a realized loss that is a charged to earnings through a reduction in noninterest income. For all other impaired debt securities, credit-related OTTI is recognized through earnings and non-credit related OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive income/loss, net of applicable taxes. The Company did not recognize any OTTI during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Loans
Loans are the Bank’s primary interest-earning asset. The following tables set forth certain information about the loan portfolio and asset quality.
The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio, by type of loan at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
51

At December 31,
20172016201520142013
Loan
Balance
% of
Total
loans
Loan
Balance
% of
Total
loans
Loan
Balance
% of
Total
loans
Loan
Balance
% of
Total
loans
Loan
Balance
% of
Total
loans
Real Estate:
Commercial$783,74555.15%$547,71151.88%$364,80244.40%$295,34746.52%$284,18756.58%
Construction36,9602.6029,4472.7938,4474.6818,9232.989,5631.90
Multifamily190,09713.38117,37311.12118,36714.4193,05414.6658,92111.73
One-to-four family25,5681.8026,4802.5137,3714.5539,9926.3035,0306.97
Commercial and industrial340,00123.93315,87029.92258,66131.49187,53629.54114,54522.82
Consumer44,5953.1418,8251.783,8250.47
Total loans receivable$1,420,966100.00%$1,055,706100.00%$821,473100.00%$634,852100.00%$502,246100.00%
The following tables set forth certain information at December 31, 2017 regarding the dollar amount of loan principal repayments becoming due during the periods indicated. The tables do not include any estimate of prepayments that significantly shorten the average loan life and may cause actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below (dollars in thousands).
CommercialConstructionMultifamilyOne-to-four
family
Commercial
and industrial
Consumer
loans
Amount due to Mature During the
Year Ending:
December 31, 2018$177,187$25,121$31,397$$74,597$16
December 31, 2019107,85421,92510,716274
December 31, 2020124,79911,8394,71520,773677
December 31, 202166,50897434,9393,936
December 31, 2022163,98315,96362,2224,049
Sub-total (within 5 years)640,33136,96074,974203,2478,952
December 31, 2023 and beyond143,414115,12325,568136,75435,643
Total$783,745$36,960$190,097$25,568$340,001$44,595
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at December 31, 2017 that are due after December 31, 2018 and have either fixed interest rates or floating interest rates (dollars in thousands):
At December 31, 2017
Fixed
Rate
% of
Total
Floating
Rate
% of
Total
Total
Loans
Real Estate:
Commercial$487,55980.40%$119,00119.60%$606,560
Construction3,34228.238,49771.7711,839
Multifamily124,49978.4534,20121.55158,700
One-to-four family5562.1725,01297.8325,568
Commercial and industrial115,54143.50149,86356.50265,404
Consumer30,24667.8514,33332.1544,579
Total$761,743$350,907$1,112,650
52

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loan originations, purchases and sales at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
20172016201520142013
Total loans at the beginning of the year$1,055,706$821,473$634,852$502,246$421,842
Loans originated:
Real Estate:
Commercial195,488230,790239,00585,86070,766
Construction52,11610,68530,3335,72912,925
Multifamily88,34789,64317,30024,17517,055
One- to four-family48,62012,68537,66322,89530,747
Commercial and industrial313,93564,46160,37381,05873,793
Consumer16,93016,6053,966
Total loans originated715,436424,869388,640219,717205,287
Loans purchased:
Commercial and industrial46,756108,72668,28338,87541,965
Total loans purchased46,756108,72668,28338,87541,965
Loans sold:
Real Estate:
Commercial and industrial7,87126,095
Total loans sold7,87126,095
Other:
Principal repayments(389,061)(273,267)(270,302)(125,986)(166,848)
Net loan activity365,260234,233186,621132,60680,404
Total loans, including loans held for sale, at end of period$1,420,966$1,055,706$821,473$634,852$502,246
Asset Quality
Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, non-accrual troubled debt restructurings and other real estate that has been acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loan obligations or upon foreclosure. Past due status on all loans is based on the contractual terms of the loan. It is generally the Bank’s policy that a loan 90 days past due be placed in non-accrual status unless factors exist that would eliminate the need to place a loan in this status. A loan may also be designated as non-accrual at any time if payment of principal or interest in full is not expected due to deteriorationchange in the financial condition of the borrower. At the time loans are placed in non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinuedgeographical mix regarding state apportionment and previously accrued interest is reversed. All payments received on non-accrual loans are applied to principal. Loans are considered for return to accrual status when they become current as to principal and interest and remain current for a period of six consecutive months or when, in the opinion of management, the Company expects to receive all of its original principal and interest. In the case of non-accrual loans where a portion of the loan has been charged off, the remaining balance is kept in non-accrual status until the entire principal balance has been recovered.
53

Delinquent Loans
The following tables set forth the Bank’s loan delinquencies, including non-accrual loans, by type and amount at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).
At December 31, 2017
30 – 89 Days90 Days or More
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Real Estate:
Commercial1$8362$787
Commercial and industrial3227
Consumer51703155
Total9$1,2335$942
At December 31, 2016
30 – 89 Days90 Days or More
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Real Estate:
Commercial2$958$
Commercial and industrial23,936
Consumer134
Total5$4,928$
At December 31, 2015
30 – 89 Days90 Days or More
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Real Estate:
One-to-four family$1$659
Commercial and industrial146
Total$2$705
At December 31, 2014
30 – 89 Days90 Days or More
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Real Estate:
One-to-four family$1$659
Total$1$659
At December 31, 2013
30 – 89 Days90 Days or More
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Number of
Loans
Principal
Balance
Real Estate:
Commercial1$3,9751$1,430
One-to-four family1659
Total1$3,9752$2,089
54

The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).
At December 31,
20172016201520142013
Non-accrual loans:
Real Estate:
Commercial$787$$1,373$1,414$5,405
One-to-four family2,4476596591,223
Commercial and industrial3,660461,915
Consumer155
Total$3,389$3,660$2,078$2,073$8,543
Troubled debt restructurings:���
Real Estate:
Commercial$1,580$5,504$1,806$447$6,379
Multifamily5,9716,0486,132
One-to-four family1,1191,1301,1301,130565
Commercial and industrial1,2553,3581,595
Total$2,699$7,889$12,265$9,220$13,076
Total non-performing assets$6,088$11,549$14,343$11,293$21,619
Ratios:
Total non-performing loans to total loans0.24%0.35%0.26%0.33%1.73%
Total non-performing loans to total assets0.19%0.30%0.22%0.27%1.34%
Total non-performing assets to total assets0.19%0.30%0.22%0.27%1.34%
Interest income that would have been recordedhigher favorable deduction for the year ended December 31, 2017, had nonaccrual loans been current according to their original terms, amounted to $88,000. The Bank recognized $101,000vesting of interest income for these loans for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended December 31, 2017, had troubled debt restructurings been current according to their original terms, is immaterial. The Bank recognized $117,000 for these loans for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Classified Assets
The following table sets forth information regarding the Bank’s classified assets, as defined under applicable regulatory standards, at the dates indicated (dollarsrestricted stock awards in thousands).
At December, 31
201720162015
Special mention$12,595$7,208$19,345
Substandard1,9664,8723,352
Doubtful
Pass1,336,242998,321757,580
Total$1,350,803$1,010,401$780,277
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred losses on existing loans. The allowance is established based on management’s evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in the Company’s portfolio in accordance with GAAP, and is comprised of both specific valuation allowances and general valuation allowances.
55

The allowance for loan losses is increased through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectability of all or a portion of the principal is unlikely. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is performed on a periodic basis and takes into consideration such factors as the credit risk grade assigned2022 compared to the loan, historical loan loss experience and review of specific impaired loans.
The following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category (dollars in thousands):
At December 31,
201720162015
Allowance
Amount
% of
Allowance
to total
Allowance
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
Allowance
Amount
% of
Allowance
to total
Allowance
% of
Loans in
Category to
Total
Loans
Allowance
Amount
% of
Allowance
to total
Allowance
% of
Loans in
Category to
Total
Loans
Real Estate:
Commercial$7,13647.92%55.15%$5,20644.06%51.88%$3,65036.71%44.40%
Construction5193.492.604093.462.795895.924.68
Multifamily1,1567.7713.386205.2511.129869.9214.41
One-to-four family1380.931.801090.922.514444.474.55
Commercial and industrial5,57837.4723.935,36445.4029.924,25442.7931.49
Consumer3602.423.141070.911.78190.190.47
Total$14,887100.00%100.00%$11,815100.00%100.00%$9,942100.00%100.00%
At December 31,
20142013
Allowance
Amount
% of
Allowance
to total
Allowance
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
Allowance
Amount
% of
Allowance
to total
Allowance
% of
Loans in
Category to
Total
Loans
Real Estate:
Commercial$3,28341.47%46.50%$3,96552.77%56.60%
Construction2693.403.001812.411.90
Multifamily7789.8314.705457.2611.70
One-to-four family4806.066.306308.397.00
Commercial and industrial3,10639.2429.502,19129.1722.80
Total$7,916100.00%100.00%$7,512100.00%100.00%
56

Summary of Loan Loss Experience
The following tables present a summary by loan portfolio segment of allowance for loan and lease loss, loan loss experience, and provision for loan losses for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20172016201520142013
Balance at beginning of the year$11,815$9,942$7,916$7,512$8,558
Charge-offs:
Real Estate:
Commercial(275)
One-to-four family(659)(471)
Commercial and industrial(3,879)(5,530)
Consumer(108)
Total charge-offs(3,987)(6,189)(746)
Recoveries:
Real Estate:
Commercial3
One-to-four family2111114
Total recoveries2111117
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(3,987)(6,187)1111(729)
Provision (credit) for loan losses7,0598,0602,015393(317)
Balance at end of the year$14,887$11,815$9,942$7,916$7,512
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding 0.32%0.66%0.16%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding1.05%1.12%1.21%1.25%1.50%
Allowance for loan losses to total nonperforming loans 439.21%322.82%478.40%381.86%87.93%
Deposits
The tables below summarize the Bank’s deposit composition by segment for the periods indicated, and the dollar and percent change from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
At December 31,
2017Percentage
of total
balance
2016Percentage
of total
balance
2015Percentage
of total
balance
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits$812,49757.86%$403,40240.59%$250,37332.68%
Money market484,58934.51482,39348.54392,52551.24
Savings accounts27,0241.9217,4721.7618,8692.46
Time deposits80,2455.7190,5139.11104,27313.62
Total$1,404,355100.00%$993,780100.00%$766,040100.00%
57

2017 vs. 2016
dollar Change
2017 vs. 2016 
percentage
Change
2016 vs. 2015
dollar Change
2016 vs. 2015 
percentage
Change
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits$409,095101.41%$153,02961.12%
Money market2,1960.4689,86822.89
Savings accounts9,55254.67(1,397)-7.40
Time deposits(10,268)(11.34)(13,760)-13.20
Total$410,57541.31%$227,74029.73%
As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the Bank’s outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was approximately $6.8 million. The following are scheduled maturities of time deposits as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
At December 31, 2017
Three months or less$19,441
Over three months through six months18,179
Over six months through one year25,625
Over one year17,000
Total$80,245
The Bank continues to focus on the acquisition and expansion of core deposit relationships, which is defined as all deposits except for certificates of deposit. Core deposits totaled $1.3 billion, or 94.3% of total deposits, at December 31, 2017, compared with 90.9% and 86.4% at December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively.
The Bank’s deposit strategy is to fund the Bank with stable, low-cost deposits, primarily checking account deposits and other low interest-bearing deposit accounts. A checking account is the driver of a banking relationship and consumers consider the bank where they have their checking account as their primary bank. These customers will typically turn to their primary bank first when in need of other financial services. Strategies that have been developed and implemented to generate these deposits include: (i) acquire deposits by deepening existing relationships and entering new markets through de novo branching or branch acquisitions, (ii) training branch employees to identify and meet client financial needs with Bank products and services, (iii) link business loans to the customer’s primary checking account at the Bank, (v) continue to develop debit card issuing business that generates non-interest bearing deposits, and (vi) constantly monitor the Bank’s pricing strategies to ensure competitive products and services.
Borrowings
At December 31, 2017, the Bank had the ability to borrow a total of  $263.4 million from the FHLBNY, subject to pledging additional collateral. It also had an available line of credit with the FRBNY discount window of  $92.9 million.
58

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s total borrowings at the dates and for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end during reporting period$119,474$106,750$116,767
Average balance outstanding during period$105,684$69,840$79,006
Weighted average interest rate during period2.61%1.74%1.84%
Balance outstanding at end of period$87,307$99,038$116,767
Weighted average interest rate at end of period3.27%1.80%1.30%
Trust Preferred Securities Payable
On December 7, 2005, the Company established MetBank Capital Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust I”). The Company owns all of the common capital securities of Trust I in exchange for contributed capital of  $310,000. Trust I issued $10 million of preferred capital securities to investors in a private transaction and invested the proceeds, combined with the proceeds from the sale of Trust I’s common capital securities, in the Company through the purchase of  $10.310 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”) issued by the Company. The Debentures, the sole assets of Trust I, mature on December 9, 2035 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.82% for the first five years, then at a floating rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 1.85%. The Debentures are callable after five years.
On July 14, 2006, the Company established MetBank Capital Trust II, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust II”). The Company owns all of the common capital securities of Trust II in exchange for contributed capital of  $310,000. Trust II issued $10 million of preferred capital securities to investors in a private transaction and invested the proceeds, combined with the proceeds from the sale of Trust II’s common capital securities, in the Company through the purchase of  $10.310 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”) issued by the Company. The Debentures, the sole assets of Trust II, mature on October 7, 2036, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.61% for the first five years, then at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.00%. The Debentures are callable after five years.
Subordinated Notes Payable
On March 8, 2017, the Company closed the issuance of its $25 million subordinated notes at 100% issue price to accredited institutional investors. The notes mature on March 15, 2027 and bear an interest rate of 6.25% per annum. The interests are paid semi-annually on March 15th and September 15th of each year through March 15, 2022 and quarterly thereafter on March 15th, June 15th, September 15th and December 15th of eachprior year.
The interest rate from March 15, 2022 to the maturity date shall reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to the then current three month LIBOR (not less than zero) plus 426 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. The Company may redeem the subordinated notes beginning with the interest payment date of March 15, 2022 and on any scheduled interest payment date thereafter. The subordinated notes may be redeemed in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
Secured Borrowings
There were $3 million in secured borrowings related to certain loan participations by the Bank as of December 31, 2017, and no secured borrowings as of December 31, 2016. These are included in Other Liabilities on the balance sheet.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities increased $10.3 million when compared to December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $2.4 million increase in accrued expenses, a 2.2 million increase in debit cardholder balances, a $2.0 million
59

increase in cash collateral held, a $1.2 million increase in accounts payable balances and a $0.5 million increase in accrued interest payable. These increases reflect the growth of the business and related expenses and payables.
Stockholders’ Equity
Total stockholders’ equity increased $127.4 million, or 116.4%, to $236.9 million at December 31, 2017, from $109.5 million at December 31, 2016. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily due to the IPO of the Company’s common stock on November 8, 2017, which yielded net proceeds, including the overallotment shares after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses, of approximately $115 million. Additionally, total stockholders’ equity increased due to $12.4 million in net income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Please see “Item 6 — Selected Financial Data” for equity performance ratios.
Contractual Obligations and

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Contractual Obligations
In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company entered into certain contractual obligations. The following table presents the Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands).
At December 31, 2017
Less Than
One Year
More than One
year Through
Three Years
More Than Three
Years Through
Five Years
Over Five
Years
Total
Operating lease obligations$2,753$5,491$4,330$6,754$19,328
Subordinated debentures20,62020,620
Subordinated notes24,48924,489
FHLB Advances42,19842,198
Time deposits63,24516,28771380,245
Total$108,196$21,778$5,043$51,863$186,880
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, which involve elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.statements of financial condition. Exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of the instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following is a table of off-balance sheet arrangements broken out by Fixedfixed and Variablevariable rate commitments for the periods indicated therein (dollars in(in thousands):

At December 31,
201720162015
Fixed RateVariable RateFixed RateVariable RateFixed RateVariable Rate
Undrawn lines of credit$39,651$76,008$60,984$9,890$74,841$898
Letters of credit23,7419,8086,460
$63,392$76,008$70,792$9,890$81,301$898
60

At December 31, 

2022

2021

2020

    

Fixed Rate

    

Variable Rate

    

Fixed Rate

    

Variable Rate

    

Fixed Rate

    

Variable Rate

    

Unused commitments

$

40,685

$

364,908

$

39,676

$

346,115

$

19,024

$

266,696

Standby and commercial letters of credit

 

53,947

 

 

49,988

 

 

34,264

 

$

94,632

$

364,908

$

89,664

$

346,115

$

53,288

$

266,696

The following is a maturity schedule for the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 2017 (dollars in2022 (in thousands):

Total20182019 – 20202021 – 20222023 and
thereafter
Undrawn lines of credit$115,659$72,873$25,505$14,281$3,000
Standby letters of credit23,74121,0452,700
$139,400$93,918$28,205$14,281$3,000

    

Total

    

2023

    

2024 - 2025

    

2026 - 2027

    

Thereafter

Unused commitments

$

405,593

$

175,490

$

199,664

$

28,939

$

1,500

Standby and commercial letters of credit

 

53,947

 

15,316

 

33,631

 

5,000

 

$

459,540

$

190,806

$

233,295

$

33,939

$

1,500

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability to economically meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature.obligations. The Company’s primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities and sales of securities.securities and borrowings. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities and borrowings are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows,

53

mortgage prepayments and mortgage prepaymentssecurity sales are greatly influenced by the general level of interest rates and changes thereto, economic conditions and competition.

The BankCompany regularly reviews the need to adjust investments in liquid assets based upon anits assessment of: (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest earninginterest-earning deposits and securities, and (4) the objectives of the ALCOits asset/liability program. Excess liquid assets areliquidity is generally invested generally in interest earning deposits and short- and intermediate-term securities.

The Bank’sCompany’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are dependent on the Company’s operating, financing, lending, and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 20172022 and December 31, 2016,2021, cash and cash equivalents totaled $261.2$257.4 million and $82.9 million,$2.4 billion, respectively. Securities classified as available-for-sale,AFS, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $32.2$445.7 million at December 31, 20172022 and $37.3$566.6 million at December 31, 2016.

At December 31, 2017, the Bank had the ability2021. There were $25.0 million and $0.0 securities pledged to borrow a total of  $263.4 million from the FHLBNY, subject to pledging additional collateral. It also had an available line of credit with the FRBNY discount window of  $92.9 million.
at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

At December 31, 2016,2022, the BankCompany had $150.0 million of Federal funds purchased and $100.0 million of FHLBNY advances. At December 31, 2022, the ability to borrow a totalCompany had available borrowing capacity of $204.4$984.4 million fromat the FHLBNY. It also had anFHLBNY, and available lineborrowing capacity of credit with$137.6 million at the FRBNY discount window of  $67.9 million.

window.

The BankCompany has no material commitments or demands that are likely to affect its liquidity other than as set forth below. In the event loan demand were to increase faster than expected, or any other unforeseen demand or commitment were to occur, the Company could access its borrowing capacity with the FHLBNYFHLB or obtain additional funds through alternative funding sources, including the brokered certificates of deposit.

Certificates of deposit market.

Time deposits due within one year as of December 31, 20172022 totaled $63.2$37.6 million, or 4.5%0.7% of total deposits. Total certificates of deposittime deposits were $80.2$52.1 million, or 5.7%1.0% of total deposits, at December 31, 2017. Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2016 totaled $56.4 million, or 5.7% of total deposits. Total certificates of deposit were $90.5 million or 9.1% of total deposits at December 31, 2016.

2022.

The Bank’sCompany’s primary investing activities are the origination, and to a lesser extent, purchase of loans and securities. The Company originated $1.8 billion and $1.2 billion of loans during the purchase of securities.years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2017, it originated or2022, the Company purchased $762.2$33.8 million and $173.6 million of loansAFS and $1.5 million of securities.HTM securities, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, it originated or2021, the Company purchased $533.6$484.8 million and $383.6 million of loansAFS and $4.2 million of securities.

HTM securities, respectively.  

Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts. The Bank experienced an increase in totalTotal deposits of  $410.6 million and $227.7 milliondecreased by $1.2 billion for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.increased $2.6 billion during the year ended December 31, 2021. The BankCompany generates deposits from businesses and individuals through client referrals and other relationships and through its retail presence. The Bank believes that itCompany has a very stable core deposit base due, primarily, to its cash management solutions for middle-market businesses as it strongly encourages and is generally successful in having business borrowers maintain their entire banking relationship with the Bank. The high level of transaction accounts is expected to be maintained. The Bank has established

61

deposit concentration thresholds to avoid the possibility of dependence on any single depositor base for funds. Since inception, it

The Company has loan participation agreements with counterparties. The Company is generally the servicer for these loans. If the transfer of the participation interest does not hadqualify for sale treatment under GAAP, the need to borrow significantly fromamount of the FHLBNYloan transferred is recorded as a secured borrowing. There were $7.7 million in secured borrowings as of December 31, 2022 and has been able to use the cash generated from the increases in deposits to fund loan growth in recent periods.

On November 10, 2017, the Company completed its initial public offering. The net proceeds from the stock offering has increased the Company’s liquidity and capital resources. Over time, the initial level$32.5 million as of liquidity will be reduced as net proceeds from the stock offering are used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of loans. The Company’s financial condition and results of operations will be enhanced by the net proceeds from the stock offering, resulting in increased net interest earning assets and net interest income. However, due to the increase in equity resulting from the net proceeds raised in the offering, as well as other factors associated with the offering, return on equity will be adversely affected until the proceeds can be invested fully in interest earning assets.
December 31, 2021.

Regulation

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federalFederal banking agencies. At December 31, 2017, 20162022 and 2015,December 31, 2021, the Company and the Bank exceededmet all applicable regulatory capital requirements and wasto be considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. The Company and the Bank manage their capital to comply with itstheir internal planning targets and regulatory capital standards administered by federal banking

54

agencies. The Company and the Bank reviewsreview capital levels on a monthly basis.

Below is a table of the Company and Bank’s capital ratios for the periods indicated:

Minimum Ratio

Minimum

Required

Minimum

At

At

Ratio to be

for Capital

Capital

December 31, 

December 31, 

“Well

Adequacy

Conservation

    

2022

2021

Capitalized”

    

Purposes

    

Buffer(1)

    

The Company

Tier 1 leverage ratio

10.2

%  

8.5

%  

N/A

4.0

%  

%  

Common equity tier 1

12.1

%  

14.1

%  

N/A

4.5

%  

2.5

%  

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

12.5

%  

14.6

%  

N/A

6.0

%  

2.5

%  

Total risk-based capital ratio

13.4

%  

16.1

%  

N/A

8.0

%  

2.5

%  

The Bank

Tier 1 leverage ratio

10.0

%  

8.4

%  

5.00

%  

4.0

%  

%  

Common equity tier 1

12.3

%  

14.4

%  

6.50

%  

4.5

%  

2.5

%  

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

12.3

%  

14.4

%  

8.00

%  

6.0

%  

2.5

%  

Total risk-based capital ratio

13.1

%  

15.2

%  

10.00

%  

8.0

%  

2.5

%  

At December 31, 2017Minimum
Ratio to be
“Well
Capitalized”
Minimum
Ratio
Required for
Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
201720162015
The Company:
Tier 1 leverage ratio13.7%10.5%9.3%N/A4.0%
Common equity tier 115.310.810.4N/A4.5%
Total risk-based capital ratio19.912.512.0N/A6.0%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio17.111.310.9N/A8.0%
The Bank:
Tier 1 leverage ratio14.7%10.4%9.3%5.0%4.0%
Common equity tier 118.411.310.86.5%4.5%
Total risk-based capital ratio19.412.412.18.0%6.0%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio18.411.310.810.0%8.0%
Basel III revised

(1) As of December 31, 2022, the capital adequacy requirements and the Prompt Corrective Action Framework effective January 1, 2015conservation buffer for the Bank. When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel Rules will require the Company and the Bank was 5.4% and 5.1%, respectively, which exceeded the minimum requirement of 2.5% required to maintainbe held by banking institutions.

As a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” on topresult of the minimum risk-weighted asset ratios.Economic Growth Act, banking regulatory agencies adopted a revised definition of “well capitalized” for eligible financial institutions and holding companies with assets of less than $10 billion (a “Qualifying Community Bank”). The rule establishes a CBLR equal to the tangible equity capital conservation buffer is designeddivided by the average total consolidated assets. Regulators have established the CBLR to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a (i) CET1be set at 8.5% through calendar year 2021 and 9% thereafter. The CARES Act, signed into law in response to risk-weighted assets, (ii) Tier 1the COVID-19 pandemic, temporarily reduced the CBLR to 8%. The Company did not elect to be governed by the CBLR framework and plans to continue to measure capital to risk-weighted assets or (iii)adequacy using the ratios in the table above. At December 31, 2022, the Company’s capital exceeded all applicable requirements.

At both December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, total capital to risk-weighted assets above the respective minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchasesCRE loans were 366.0% and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers based on the amount343.4% of the shortfall. The implementationBank’s risk-based capital, respectively.

55

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting standards, please see Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
62

Item 7a.7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

General

The principal objective of the Company’s asset and liability management function is to evaluate the interest rate risk within the balance sheet and pursue a controlled assumption of interest rate risk while maximizing net income and preserving adequate levels of liquidity and capital. The Board of Directors of the Company has oversight of the Bank’sCompany’s asset and liability management function, which is managed by itsthe Company’s ALCO. The ALCO meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to market interest rate changes, local and national market conditions and market interest rates. That group also reviews liquidity, capital, deposit mix, loan mix and investment positions.

Interest Rate Risk

As a financial institution, the Bank’sCompany’s primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most assets and liabilities, and the fair value of all interest earninginterest-earning assets and interest bearinginterest-bearing liabilities, other than those which have a short term to maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.

The Company manages its exposure to interest rates primarily by structuring its balance sheet in the ordinary course of business. It does not typically enter into derivative contracts for the purposeThe Company generally originates fixed and floating rate loans with maturities of managingless than five years. The interest rate risk but may do so inon these loans is offset by the future.cost of deposits, where many of such deposits generally pay interest based on a floating rate index. Based upon the nature of operations, the Company is not subject to foreign exchangeFX or commodity price risk and does not own any trading assets.

In the first quarter of 2020, the Company entered into an interest rate cap derivative contract as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. In the third quarter of 2022, the Company terminated the interest rate cap. For further discussion of the interest rate cap, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Discussion of Financial Condition – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”

Net Interest Income At-Risk

The BankCompany analyzes its sensitivity to changes in interest rates through a net interest income simulation model. It estimatemodel, which estimates what net interest income would be for a one-year period based on current interest rates, and then calculates what the net interest income would be for the same period under different interest rate assumptions. For modeling purposes, the Company reclassifies licensing fees on corporate cash management accounts from non-interest expense to interest expense since the fees are indexed to certain market interest rates.

The following table shows the estimated impact on net interest income for the one-year period beginning December 31, 20172022 resulting from potential changes in interest rates, expressed in basis points. These estimates require certain assumptions to be made, including loan and mortgage-related investment prepayment speeds, reinvestment rates, and deposit maturities and decay rates. These assumptions are inherently uncertain. As a result, no simulation model can precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income.

Although the net interest income table below provides an indication of the Company’s interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such estimates are not intended to, and do not, provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on net interest income and will differ from actual results. The following table indicates the

56

sensitivity of projected annualized net interest income to the interest rate movements described above at December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 2017
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)Net Interest Income Year 1 ForecastYear 1 Change from Level
+400$78,89328.3%
+300$74,53821.2%
+200$70,18014.1%
+100$65,9187.2%
$61,509—%
-100$57,534-6.46%

At December 31, 2022

Change in

Net

Year 1

Interest

Interest

Change

Rates

Income Year 1

from 

(basis points)

    

Forecast

    

Level

+400

$

214,811

(7.39)

%

+300

218,743

(5.70)

+200

222,668

(4.01)

+100

227,657

(1.86)

231,961

-100

235,250

1.42

-200

237,337

2.32

-300

237,128

2.23

-400

240,389

3.63

The table above indicates that at December 31, 2017,2022, in the event of aan instantaneous and sustained parallel upward shift of 200 basis point increasepoints in interest rates, the Company would experience a 14.1% increasean 4.01% decrease in net interest income. In the event of aan instantaneous and sustained parallel downward shift of 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, it would experience a 6.46% decrease1.42% increase in net interest income.

63

Economic Value of Equity Analysis

The BankCompany analyzes the sensitivity of its financial condition to changes in interest rates through an economic value of equityEVE model. This analysis measures the difference between predicted changes in the fair value of assets and predicted changes in the presentfair value of liabilities assuming various changes in current interest rates.

The table below represents an analysis of interest rate riskIRR as measured by the estimated changes in economic value of equity,EVE, resulting from an instantaneous and sustained parallel shiftshifts in the yield curve (+/- 100, +200, +300+/- 200, +/- 300 and +400 basis points and -100+/- 400 basis points) at December 31, 20172022 (dollars in thousands):
Estimated Increase (Decrease) in EVE
EVE as a Percentage of Fair Value of Assets(3)
Change in Interest Rates
(basis points)(1)
Estimated EVE(2)
DollarsPercent
EVE Ratio(4)
Increase (Decrease)
(basis points)
+400$277,889($6,643)-2.3%17.08%0.65
+300$279,015(5,517)-1.9%16.91%0.48
+200$279,644(4,888)-1.7%16.70%0.28
+100$284,235(297)-0.1%16.68%0.25
-$284,53216.43%
-100$278,512(6,020)-2.1%15.83%(0.59)

Estimated

EVE 

 Increase (Decrease) in

as a Percentage of Fair

EVE

Value of Assets (3)

Change in

Increase

Interest Rates

Estimated 

EVE

(Decrease)

(basis points) (1)

    

EVE (2)

    

Dollars

    

Percent

    

Ratio (4)

    

(basis points)

+400

$

546,271

$

(202,948)

(27.09)

%

9.62

(253.25)

+300

597,219

(152,000)

(20.29)

10.31

(184.21)

+200

648,475

(100,744)

(13.45)

10.97

(118.30)

+100

704,426

(44,793)

(5.98)

11.66

(49.16)

749,219

12.16

-100

780,626

31,407

4.19

12.43

27.12

-200

794,931

45,712

6.10

12.44

28.12

-300

789,773

40,554

5.41

12.14

(1.20)

-400

750,021

802

0.11

11.37

(78.79)

(1)Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
(2)EVE is the fair value of expected cash flows from assets, less the fair value of the expected cash flows arising from liabilities adjusted for the value of off-balance sheet contracts.
(3)Fair value of assets represents the amount at which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable and willing parties in an arms-length transaction.
(4)EVE Ratio represents EVE divided by the fair value of assets.

57

(1)
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
(2)
EVE is the fair value of expected cash flows from assets, less the fair value of the expected cash flows arising from liabilities adjusted for the value of off-balance sheet contracts.
(3)
Fair value of assets represents the amount at which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable and willing parties in an arms-length transaction.
(4)
EVE Ratio represents EVE divided by the fair value of assets.

The table above indicates that at December 31, 2017,2022, in the event of a 100an immediate upward shift of 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, the BankCompany would experience a 2.1%13.45% decrease in its economic value of equity.EVE. In the event of a 200an immediate downward shift of 100 basis points increase in interest rates, itthe Company would experience a decrease of 1.7%4.19% increase in economic value of equity.

its EVE.

The preceding income simulation analysis doesanalyses do not represent a forecast of actual results and should not be relied upon as being indicative of expected operating results. These hypothetical estimates are based upon numerous assumptions, which are subject to change, including: the nature and timing of interest rate levels including the yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, reinvestment/replacement of asset and liability cash flows, and others. Also, as market conditions vary, prepayment/refinancing levels, the varying impact of interest rate changes on caps and floors embedded in adjustable-rate loans, early withdrawal of deposits, changes in product preferences, and other internal/external variables will likely deviate from those assumed.

Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and related financial data included in this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America,GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

64

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

For the Company’s consolidated financial statements, see index on page 65.

68.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure

a)Controls and Procedures
a)
Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and PrincipalChief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2017.2022. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and PrincipalChief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

b)

b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include a management’s report regardingfinancial reporting. The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting dueis designed under the supervision of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to a transition period established by rulesprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of the SecuritiesCompany’s consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide

c)

58

Attestation Report

reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with the authorization of management and the Board of Directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Not applicableCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections on any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the Company is an emerging growth company.

d)
Changesdegree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.

As of December 31, 2022, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework established in Internal Control Over– Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon its assessment, management believes that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 was effective using these criteria.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by Crowe LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that has also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

c)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 20172022 that hashad materially affected, or iswas reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 9C.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information regarding the Company’s directors, executive officers and corporate governance is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2017.2022. Specifically, the Company incorporates herein the information regarding its directors and executive officers included in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Proposal I1 — Election of Directors — Nominees and Continuing Directors,” “— Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors” and “— Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.Reports.

Information regarding the Company’s corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement under the headingsheading “Proposal I1 — Election of Directors — Committees of the Board of Directors — Audit Committee” and “— Code of Ethics.Committee.” The Company has adopted a written Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller, or persons performing similar functions, and employees. The Code of Ethics is published on the Company’s website, www.metropolitanbankny.com.www.mcbankny.com. The Company will provide to any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of such Code of Ethics. Such request should be made in writing to: Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. 99 Park Ave 4thAve., 12th Floor, New York, NY,New York, 10016, attentionattention: Investor Relations.

59

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Information regarding executive and director compensation and the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement under the headings “Proposal I — Election of Directors — Executive Officer Compensation,heading “Compensation Matters,“— Director Compensation,“Compensation Discussion and Analysis,“— Director Fees,“Compensation Committee Report,“CEO Pay Ratio” and “— Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”.

“Pay Versus Performance.”

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management isare included under the heading “Voting Securities and Principal Holders — Principal Holders”“Stock Ownership” in the Proxy Statement and isare incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

At December 31, 2022, the Company had the following equity awards outstanding:

Plan Category

Number of Securities To be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Restricted Stock Units

Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Restricted Stock Units

Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Number of Securities To be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Restricted Stock Units)

Equity Compensation Plans Approved By Security Holders

439,762

47.36

358,572

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

Total

439,762

47.36

358,572

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The “Transactions with Related Persons” sectionand “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors – Board Independence” sections of the Company’s 20172023 Proxy Statement isare incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The “Proposal II2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” section of the Company’s 20172023 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

60

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statements

See index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 68.

65.

Financial Statement Schedules

Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto under “PartPart II — Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.Data.

Exhibits Required by Item 601 of SEC Regulation S-K

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333 220805)).

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2021 (File No. 333-254197)).

3.3

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2021 (File No. 001-38282)).

4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S 1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333 220805)).

4.2

Description of Securities of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2020 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.1

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Mark R. DeFazio (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805)).

10.2

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805)).

10.3

First Amendment to 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.4

Second Amendment to 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.5

Metropolitan Commercial Bank Amended and Restated Executive Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2017 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.6

Form of Performance Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement - 2009 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

See Index of Exhibits on pages 116 through 117.

61

66

10.7

Amendment One to Restricted Share Agreements - 2009 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.8

Form of Restricted Share Agreement - 2009 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.9

Form of Stock Option Agreement - 2009 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.10

Employment Agreement by and between Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Scott Lublin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2018 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.11

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. 2019 Equity (incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2019 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.12

Change in Control Agreement between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Nick Rosenberg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2019 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.13

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement – 2019 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26. 2019 (File No. 333-233465)).

10.14

Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement – 2019 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26. 2019 (File No. 333-233465)).

10.15

Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement – 2019 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26. 2019 (File No. 333-233465)).

10.16

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement – 2019 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26. 2019 (File No. 333-233465)).

10.17

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement – 2019 Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26. 2019 (File No. 333-233465)).

10.18

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 20, 2022 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.19

Form of Director Award Agreement

10.20

Form of Executive Award Agreement with Time-Based Vesting

10.21

Form of Executive Award Agreement with Performance-Based Vesting

10.22

Change in Control Agreement between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Gregory Sigrist (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2020 (File No. 001-38282)).

10.23

Change in Control Agreement between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Laura Capra

21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333 220805).

23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

Inline Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operation for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, and (vi) the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

104

The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, has been formatted in Inline XBRL

Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary

None.

63

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

Date: MarchFebruary 28, 20182023

By:

By:

/s/ Mark R. DeFazio

Mark R. DeFazio

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

Title

Date

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ Mark R. DeFazio

Mark R. DeFazio

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal

February 28, 2023

Mark R. DeFazio

(Principal Executive Officer)

March 28, 2018

/s/ GerardGregory A. Perri

Gerard A. Perri
Sigrist

Executive Vice President and Chief OperatingFinancial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March

February 28, 2018

2023

Gregory A. Sigrist

/s/ Daniel K. Wong

Daniel K. Wong

Vice President

(Principal Financial and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

March 28, 2018

/s/ David M. Gavrin

David M. Gavrin
William Reinhardt

Chairman of the Board

March

February 28, 2018

2023

William Reinhardt

/s/ Dale C. Fredston

Director

February 28, 2023

Dale C. Fredston

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ David J. Gold

Director

February 28, 2023

David J. Gold

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ Mark H. Goldberg

Mark H. Goldberg

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ Harvey M. Gutman

Director

February 28, 2023

Harvey M. Gutman

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ Terence J. Mitchell

Director

February 28, 2023

Terence J. Mitchell

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ Robert C. Patent

Director

February 28, 2023

Robert C. Patent

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ Maria F. Ramirez

Director

February 28, 2023

Maria F. Ramirez

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ William Reinhardt

William Reinhardt

Director

March 28, 2018

/s/ Robert Usdan

Robert Usdan
Anthony J. Fabiano

Director

Director

March

February 28, 2018

2023

Anthony J. Fabiano

/s/ George J. Wolf, Jr.

Director

February 28, 2023

George J. Wolf, Jr.

Director

March

/s/ Chaya Pamula

Director

February 28, 20182023

Chaya Pamula

/s/ Katrina Robinson

Director

February 28, 2023

Katrina Robinson

64

67

Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PCAOB ID - 173)

69

66

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

70

69

71

70

72

71

73

72

74

73

74

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION

74

NOTE 2 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

75

74

NOTE 3 — SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

82

NOTE 4 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES

83

NOTE 5 — LOANS

87

NOTE 6 — LEASES

93

NOTE 7 — PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

94

NOTE 8 — DEPOSITS

94

NOTE 9 — BORROWINGS

95

NOTE 10 — INCOME TAXES

96

NOTE 11 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

98

NOTE 12 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

98

NOTE 13 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

101

NOTE 14 — STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

101

NOTE 15 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

103

NOTE 16 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

103

NOTE 17 — REGULATORY CAPITAL

105

NOTE 18 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

107

NOTE 19 — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

108

NOTE 20 — REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

109

NOTE 21 — DERIVATIVES

110

NOTE 22 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

110

NOTE 23 — PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

111

UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

114

65

68

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Stockholders

Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Subsidiary
Subsidiaries

New York, New York

Opinion

Opinions on the Financial Statements

and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and SubsidiarySubsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinion

TheseOpinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, are the responsibilityfor maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the Company’s management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of itsfraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in accordance with the standardsall material respects.

Our audits of the PCAOB. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.

Our auditsstatements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as

66

evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Loan Losses – Qualitative and Economic Factors

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, management estimates the allowance for loan losses for non-impaired loans using historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative and economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These qualitative and economic factors include economic and business conditions, the nature and volume of the portfolio, lending terms and volumes and the severity of past due loans.

We consider auditing management’s application of the qualitative and economic factors in the allowance for loan losses to be a critical audit matter due to the extent of audit effort and degree of auditor subjectivity and judgment required to evaluate the qualitative and economic factors given the volume and nature of factors and the significant management judgment required.

To address this matter, we tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls related to the qualitative and economic factors, including the following:

Management’s review of the mathematical accuracy of the allowance for loan losses including the completeness and accuracy of the internal data and the relevance and reliability of external data used as the basis for qualitative and economic factors;
Management’s monitoring of the completeness, accuracy and severity of past due loans;

67

Management’s evaluation and approval of the judgments related to the qualitative and economic factors and the resulting allocation for each portfolio segment to the allowance for loan losses; and
Management’s evaluation and approval of the overall allowance for loan losses.

Our substantive procedures related to the qualitative and economic factors included the following:

Testing the mathematical accuracy of the allowance for loan losses, including the completeness and accuracy of the internal data and the relevance and reliability of external data used as the basis for the qualitative and economic factors;
Testing the completeness, accuracy, and severity of past due loans;
Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s application of qualitative and economic factors and the resulting allocation for each portfolio segment to the allowance for loan losses; and
Testing the reasonableness of the overall allowance for loan losses.

/s/ Crowe Horwath

LLP

We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2008.

New York, New York

February 28, 2023

Livingston, New Jersey
March [  ], 2018

68

69

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

20172016
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks$261,231$82,931
U.S. Government securities money market funds
Total cash and cash equivalents261,23182,931
Investment securities available for sale, at estimated fair value32,15737,329
Investment securities held to maturity (estimated fair value of  $5,330 and $6,419
at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
5,4286,500
Other investments13,67712,588
Loans1,420,9661,055,706
Deferred loan fees and unamortized costs, net(1,070)(1,160)
Allowance for loan losses(14,887)(11,815)
Net loans1,405,0091,042,731
Accounts receivable, net6,6015,420
Receivable from prepaid card programs, net9,5797,566
Accrued interest receivable4,4212,735
Premises and equipment, net6,2685,035
Prepaid expenses and other assets5,7517,733
Goodwill9,7339,733
Total assets$1,759,855$1,220,301
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits$812,497$403,402
Interest-bearing deposits591,858590,378
Total deposits1,404,355993,780
FHLB Advances42,19878,418
Trust preferred securities payable20,62020,620
Subordinated debt, net of issuance costs24,489
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities21,67810,901
Accrued interest payable749227
Debit cardholder balances8,8826,864
Total liabilities1,522,9711,110,810
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares Issued and
outstanding 0 at December 31, 2017 and 2016
Class B preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 2,000,000 shares, issued and
outstanding 272,636 at December 31, 2017 and 2016
33
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 8,196,310 and 4,604,563 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively8145
Additional paid in capital211,14596,116
Retained earnings25,86113,492
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect(206)(165)
Total stockholders’ equity236,884109,491
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$1,759,855$1,220,301

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Assets

Cash and due from banks

$

26,780

$

28,864

Overnight deposits

230,638

2,330,486

Total cash and cash equivalents

257,418

2,359,350

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value

445,747

566,624

Investment securities held to maturity (estimated fair value of $437.3 million and $380.1 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)

510,425

382,099

Equity investment securities, at fair value

2,048

2,273

Total securities

958,220

950,996

Other investments

22,110

11,998

Loans, net of deferred fees and costs

4,840,523

3,731,929

Allowance for loan losses

(44,876)

(34,729)

Net loans

4,795,647

3,697,200

Receivable from global payments business, net

85,605

39,864

Other assets

148,337

56,950

Total assets

$

6,267,337

$

7,116,358

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Deposits

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

$

2,422,151

$

3,668,673

Interest-bearing deposits

2,855,761

2,766,899

Total deposits

5,277,912

6,435,572

Federal funds purchased

150,000

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances

100,000

Trust preferred securities

20,620

20,620

Subordinated debt, net of issuance cost

24,712

Secured borrowings

7,725

32,461

Prepaid third-party debit cardholder balances

10,579

8,847

Other liabilities

124,604

37,157

Total liabilities

5,691,440

6,559,369

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 10,949,965 and 10,920,569 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively

109

109

Additional paid in capital

389,276

382,999

Retained earnings

240,810

181,385

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

(54,298)

(7,504)

Total stockholders’ equity

575,897

556,989

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

6,267,337

$

7,116,358

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

69

70

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015
2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

201720162015
Interest and dividend income:
Loans, including fees$57,075$42,360$31,110
Securities:
Taxable8138861,024
Tax-exempt303031
Money market funds and commercial paper315142110
Other interest and dividends2,520737407
Total interest income60,75344,15532,682
Interest expense:
Deposits5,8734,8773,805
FHLB Advances840673999
Trust preferred securities payable interest expense636539456
Subordinated debt interest expense1,322
Total interest expense8,6716,0895,260
Net interest income52,08238,06627,422
Provision for loan losses7,0598,0602,015
Net interest income after provision for loan losses45,02330,00625,407
Non-interest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts3,452876754
Other service charges and fees4,3681,179476
Loan prepayment penalties111402700
Debit card income3,3692,9262,568
Net gains on securities transactions40
Total non-interest income11,3005,4234,498
Non-interest expense:
Compensation and benefits19,16617,01013,221
Bank premises and equipment4,3853,9853,620
Directors Fees894611540
Insurance Expense281333363
Professional fees2,6361,5951,360
FDIC assessment1,067675554
Core processing fees1,495862788
Other expenses2,8212,3002,631
Total non-interest expense32,74527,37123,077
Net income before income tax expense23,5788,0586,828
Income tax expense11,2093,0452,559
Net income$12,369$5,013$4,269
Earnings per common share
Earnings per share – basic2.400.431.54
Earnings per share – diluted2.340.431.54

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Interest and dividend income

Loans, including fees

$

231,851

$

164,528

$

136,497

Securities

Taxable

15,432

5,649

3,208

Tax-exempt

203

189

Money market funds

34

Overnight deposits

12,314

2,310

2,546

Other interest and dividends

939

608

812

Total interest income

260,739

173,284

143,097

Interest expense

Deposits

29,284

14,241

14,244

Borrowed funds

893

1,742

Trust preferred securities

799

424

572

Subordinated debt

605

1,618

1,618

Total interest expense

31,581

16,283

18,176

Net interest income

229,158

157,001

124,921

Provision for loan losses

10,116

3,816

9,488

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

219,042

153,185

115,433

Non-interest income

Service charges on deposit accounts

5,747

4,755

3,728

Global Payments Group revenue

19,341

16,445

8,464

Other income

1,505

2,497

4,811

Total non-interest income

26,593

23,697

17,003

Non-interest expense

Compensation and benefits

57,290

45,908

39,797

Bank premises and equipment

8,855

8,055

8,340

Professional fees

14,423

6,750

4,122

Technology costs

4,713

5,201

3,387

Licensing fees

10,477

8,606

9,653

FDIC assessments

4,625

3,852

2,041

Regulatory settlement reserve

35,000

Other expenses

13,354

8,940

7,178

Total non-interest expense

148,737

87,312

74,518

Net income before income tax expense

96,898

89,570

57,918

Income tax expense

37,473

29,015

18,452

Net income

$

59,425

$

60,555

$

39,466

Earnings per common share

Basic earnings

$

5.42

$

6.64

$

4.76

Diluted earnings

$

5.29

$

6.45

$

4.66

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

70

71

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015
2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

201720162015
Net Income$12,369$5,013$4,269
Other comprehensive loss
Unrealized gains/losses of securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding loss arising during the year(54)(268)(220)
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income(40)
Total unrealized gains/loss on securities available for sale(54)(308)(220)
Tax effect(13)(127)(107)
Total unrealized gains/loss on securities available for sale, net of tax(41)(181)(113)
Comprehensive income$12,328$4,832$4,156
thousands)

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Net Income

$

59,425

$

60,555

$

39,466

Other comprehensive income:

Securities available for sale:

Unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period

(76,934)

(14,722)

4,877

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

(609)

(3,286)

Tax effect

23,353

4,795

(514)

Net of tax

(53,581)

(10,536)

1,077

Cash flow hedges:

Unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period

11,704

2,957

(1,925)

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

(1,949)

Tax effect

(2,968)

(898)

614

Net of tax

6,787

2,059

(1,311)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

(46,794)

(8,477)

(234)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

$

12,631

$

52,078

$

39,232

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

71

72

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015
2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Preferred Stock,
Class A
Preferred Stock,
Class B
Common StockAdditional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
AOCI
(Loss),
Net
Total
Number
of
Shares
AmountNumber
of
Shares
AmountNumber
of
Shares
Amount
Balance at January 1, 2015415,248$460,000$12,321,615$23$50,750$7,836$129$58,743
Conversion of preferred to common stock(24,204)13,447
Issuance of common stock, net722,222712,59912,606
Restricted stock38,500
Employee stock-based compensation expense447447
Net income4,2694,269
Other comprehensive loss(113)(113)
Balance at December 31, 2015391,044$460,000$13,095,784$30$63,796$12,105$16$75,952
Balance at January 1, 2016391,044$460,000$13,095,784$30$63,796$12,105$16$75,952
Purchase & retirement of treasury preferred
stock
(123,924)(1)(1,238)(161)(1,400)
Preferred stock – redemption(267,120)(3)(2,624)(45)(2,672)
Conversion of preferred to common stock(60,000)(1)60,0001(0)
Issuance of preferred stock, net272,63635,5005,503
Issuance of common stock, net1,374,1121428,35428,368
Restricted stock, net74,667
Class A preferred – dividend payment(3,420)(3,420)
Employee stock-based compensation2,3282,328
Net income5,0135,013
Other comprehensive loss(181)(181)
Balance at December 31, 2016$272,636$34,604,563$45$96,116$13,492$(165)$109,491
Balance at January 1, 2017$272,636$34,604,563$45$96,116$13,492$(165)$109,491
Employee stock-based compensation expense412412
Common stock issued in initial public offering, net of stock issuance costs of $10,0023,565,00036114,737114,773
Restricted stock grants, net of forfeiture28,383
Exercise of stock options4,503135135
Repurchase of shares for exercise of stock
options and tax withholding for restricted
stock vesting
(6,139)(255)(255)
Net income12,36912,369
Other comprehensive loss(41)(41)
Balance at December 31, 2017$272,636$38,196,310$81$211,145$25,861$(206)$236,884

Preferred Stock,

Common

Additional

Retained

AOCI (Loss),

  

Class B

  

Stock

  

Paid-in Capital

  

Earnings

  

Net

  

Total

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Balance at January 1, 2022

$

10,920,569

$

109

$

382,999

$

181,385

$

(7,504)

$

556,989

Net issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans

48,479

Employee and non-employee stock-based compensation

7,836

7,836

Redemption of common stock for exercise of stock options and tax withholdings for restricted stock vesting

(19,083)

(1,559)

(1,559)

Net income

59,425

59,425

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(46,794)

(46,794)

Balance at December 31, 2022

$

10,949,965

$

109

$

389,276

$

240,810

$

(54,298)

$

575,897

Balance at January 1, 2021

272,636

$

3

8,295,272

$

82

$

218,899

$

120,830

$

973

$

340,787

Issuance of common stock

2,300,000

23

162,664

162,687

Preferred Stock converted to Common Stock

(272,636)

(3)

272,636

3

Net issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans

101,291

1

1

Employee and non-employee stock-based compensation

4,821

4,821

Redemption of common stock for exercise of stock options and tax withholdings for restricted stock vesting

(48,630)

(3,385)

(3,385)

Net income

60,555

60,555

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(8,477)

(8,477)

Balance at December 31, 2021

$

10,920,569

$

109

$

382,999

$

181,385

$

(7,504)

$

556,989

Balance at January 1, 2020

272,636

$

3

8,312,918

$

82

$

216,468

$

81,364

$

1,207

$

299,124

Net issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans

(3,298)

Employee and non-employee stock-based compensation

3,312

3,312

Redemption of common stock for exercise of stock options and tax withholdings for restricted stock vesting

(14,348)

(881)

(881)

Net income

39,466

39,466

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(234)

(234)

Balance at December 31, 2020

272,636

$

3

8,295,272

$

82

$

218,899

$

120,830

$

973

$

340,787

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

72

73

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015
2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

201720162015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$12,369$5,013$4,269
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash:
Depreciation and amortization978785696
Net amortization on securities321355492
Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs46
Gain on sale of securities(40)
Provision for loan losses7,0598,0602,015
Net change in deferred loan fees(90)(15)(1,006)
Deferred income tax benefit790(913)(455)
Stock-based compensation expense4122,328447
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable(1,686)(434)(628)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities10,777(1,215)1,542
Change in debit card holder balances2,0186,635(2,919)
Change in Accrued interest payable522(93)(6)
Accounts receivable, net(1,181)(4,550)245
Receivable from prepaid card programs, net(2,013)(187)3,703
Prepaid expenses and other assets1,151(1,171)(2,952)
Net cash provided by operating activities31,47314,5585,443
Cash flows from investing activities:
Loan originations and payments, net(377,118)(240,420)(184,597)
Proceeds from sales of loans7,871
Redemptions of other investments7,203
Purchases of other investments(8,292)(182)(5,368)
Purchase of securities available for sale(1,470)(1,546)
Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale2,771
Proceeds from paydowns and maturities of securities available for sale6,3598,3789,491
Purchase of securities held to maturity(2,684)(5,151)
Proceeds from paydowns of securities held to maturity1,0341,198283
Purchase of premises and equipment, net(2,211)(1,180)(1,732)
Net cash used in investing activities(366,624)(233,665)(187,074)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net114,77328,36812,606
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net5,503
Purchase and retirement of treasury preferred stock(1,400)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options135
Redemption of common stock for exercise of stock options and tax withholdings for resticted stock vesting(255)
Redemption of preferred stock, net(2,672)
Payment of preferred stock dividend(3,420)
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt, net of issuance cost24,443
Proceeds from FHLB advances326,864120,00097,426
Repayments of FHLB advances(363,084)(137,729)(65,202)
Net increase in deposits410,575227,741156,793
Net cash provided by financing activities513,451236,391201,623
Increase in cash and cash equivalents178,30017,28419,992
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year82,93165,64745,655
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year$261,231$82,931$65,647
Supplemental information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest$8,149$6,182$5,025
Taxes$8,787$5,270$3,265
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfer of loans held for investment to held for sale$7,871$26,095$
thousands)

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income

$

59,425

$

60,555

$

39,466

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash:

Net depreciation amortization and accretion

4,338

5,063

4,603

Provision for loan losses

10,116

3,816

9,488

Stock-based compensation

7,836

4,821

3,312

Net change in deferred loan fees

5,374

2,332

296

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

(4,000)

(120)

290

(Gain) loss on sale of securities

(609)

(3,286)

(Gain) loss on sale of loans

190

Dividends earned on CRA fund

(33)

(22)

(41)

Unrealized (gain) loss on equity securities

258

62

(48)

Net change in:

Receivable from global payments, net

(45,741)

(12,605)

(15,678)

Third-party debit cardholder balances

1,732

(6,983)

16,227

Other assets

3,407

6,167

(5,121)

Other liabilities

43,179

(25,200)

37,572

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

85,891

37,277

87,270

Cash flows from investing activities

Loan originations, purchases and payments, net

(1,113,963)

(618,323)

(476,419)

Proceeds from loans sold

16,622

11,476

Redemptions of other investments

20,030

7

10,980

Purchases of other investments

(30,142)

(407)

(1,140)

Purchase of securities available-for-sale

(33,776)

(484,793)

(234,366)

Purchase of securities held-for-investment

(173,625)

(383,619)

Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available-for-sale

43,241

141,422

Proceeds from paydowns of securities available-for-sale

76,728

124,118

64,973

Proceeds from paydowns of securities held-to-maturity

44,643

4,152

932

Purchase of derivative contract

(2,980)

Purchase of premises and equipment, net

(19,245)

(3,995)

(3,913)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(1,229,350)

(1,302,997)

(489,035)

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

162,687

Proceeds from issuance of Federal funds purchased

150,000

Proceeds from FHLB advances

975,100

150

Repayments of FHLB advances

(875,100)

(150)

(144,000)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

194

Redemption of common stock for tax withholdings for restricted stock vesting

(1,559)

(3,385)

(881)

Redemption of subordinated debt

(24,712)

Proceeds from (repayments of) secured borrowings, net

(24,736)

(4,503)

(6,008)

Net increase (decrease) in deposits

(1,157,660)

2,605,966

1,027,739

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(958,473)

2,760,765

876,850

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(2,101,932)

1,495,045

475,085

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

2,359,350

864,305

389,220

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

$

257,418

$

2,359,350

$

864,305

Supplemental information

Cash paid for:

Interest

$

31,599

$

16,249

$

18,693

Income Taxes

$

35,304

$

24,165

$

19,085

Non-cash item:

Transfer of loans from held-for-investment to held-for-sale

$

$

17,492

$

1,716

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

73

74

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization:   ORGANIZATION

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (a, a New York Corporation)corporation (the “Company”), is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of Metropolitan Commercial Bank (the “Bank”), its wholly-owned subsidiary. The Bank’sCompany’s primary market is the New York metropolitan area. The Bank offersCompany provides a traditionalbroad range of business, commercial and retail banking products and services to individuals,small businesses, middle-market enterprises, public entities and others needing banking services. Itsaffluent individuals. See the “Glossary of Common Terms and Acronyms” for the definition of certain terms and acronyms used throughout this Form 10-K.

The Company’s primary lending products are commercial mortgagesCRE loans, C&I loans, and commercial and industrialmulti-family loans. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets, consumer assets, and commercial and residential real estate. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flowflows from operations of businesses.

The Bank’sCompany’s primary deposit products are checking, savings, and term deposit accounts, and its deposit accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) underFDIC up to the maximum amounts allowed by law. The Bank commenced operations on June 22, 1999.

In addition to traditional commercial banking products, the Company offers corporate cash management and retail banking services and, through its Global Payments Group (“global payments business”), provides BaaS to its fintech partners, which includes serving as an issuing bank for third-party managed debit card programs nationwide and providing other services and financial infrastructure, including cash settlement and custodian deposit services.

The Company isand the Bank are subject to the regulations of certain state and federal agencies and, accordingly, isare periodically examined by those regulatory authorities. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities, theThe Company’s business is susceptible to being affected by state and federal legislation and regulations.

Basis of Presentation:

NOTE 2 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)GAAP and predominant practices within the U.S. banking industry. The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements (the “financial statements”) include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Financial Statements (the “financial statements”), which include the accounts of the Company and the Bank, have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the yearsperiods presented. A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management has made estimates and assumptions thatbased on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reported periods.

A summary Actual results could differ from those estimated. Information available which could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the Company’s significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows:
Use of Estimates:   To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimateseconomy, and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reportedchanges in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ.
condition of borrowers.

Cash Flows:   

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand and amounts due from banks and money market funds. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, and other investments.

74

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Securities:   

Debt securities are classified as held to maturityHTM and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt securities are classified as available for saleAFS when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for saleclassified as AFS are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in net income.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiumpremiums or discount.discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized onusing the level yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securitiesMBS where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method. Gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations upon sale.

75

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Management evaluates AFS and HTM securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)OTTI on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1)(1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement of operations and 2) other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI)(2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Accounts Receivable &

Receivable from Prepaid Card Programs,Global Payments Business, Net:   Accounts receivables, net, primarily consist of

Receivables from the Bank’s in-transitglobal payments business are predominantly related to prepaid credit card programs.

Revenue Recognition 

Any revenues from contracts with customers, which are not exempt from the accounting requirements under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are accounted for using the five-step method prescribed by the ASC. These revenue items trade receivables from prepaidare debit card programsincome, service charges on deposit accounts and other receivables. Receivables from prepaid card programs are predominantly government scheduled payments including financial assistance programs and pensions.

Revenue Recognition:   Revenueservice charges. In accordance with the ASC, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the related services have been provided and amounts have been earned. Prepaid debit card income consists of monthly maintenance fees, ATM fees, point-of-sale transaction fees, and other revenues.consideration which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these services. The Company recognizes revenue relatedapplies the following five steps to maintenance fees from prepaid debit cardholders onproperly recognize revenue: (i) identify the contract(s) with a monthly basis, ATM fees from cardholders when customers withdraw money at certain ATMs, and point-of-sale transaction fees when customers usecustomer, (ii) identify the cards for purchases, in accordance with the terms and conditionsperformance obligations in the cardholder agreements.contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from interest income on loans, which is not subject to the ASC.

Licensing Fees

Licensing fees on certain deposit accounts held by bankruptcy trustees are expensed as incurred. These accounts require the use of a software interface provided by a third party. Bankruptcy accounts subject to the licensing fees amounted to  $425.3 million and $934.3 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

75

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Transfers of Financial Assets:   

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Transfers of financial assets that do not meet the criteria to be accounted for as sales are recorded as secured borrowings.

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses:   

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balances, adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments.

The allowance for loan lossesALLL is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover probable incurred credit losses. In determining the level to be maintained, management evaluates many factors, including current economic trends, industry experience, historical loss experience, industry loan concentrations, the borrower’s ability to repay and repayment performance and estimated collateral values. Loan losses are chargedcharged-off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired.

ALLL.

A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that the BankCompany will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is

(continued)
76

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
expected solely from the collateral. All commercial and commercial real estate loans are individually evaluated for credit risk at least annually, and all classified loans are individually evaluated for impairment quarterly. Large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans such as residential real estate loans are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, are not separately evaluated for impairment disclosures unless the individual loan is classified.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for

If a loan is impaired, impairment disclosures and areis measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net,or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Bank determines the amountAll commercial and CRE loans are individually evaluated for credit risk at least annually, and all classified loans are individually evaluated for impairment quarterly. Large groups of reserve in accordance with the accounting policysmaller balance homogenous loans such as residential real estate loans are collectively evaluated for theimpairment, and accordingly, are not separately evaluated for impairment disclosures unless an individual loan is classified.

The allowance for loan losses.

The general component of the allowance covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the BankCompany over a rolling two-year period. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other qualitative and economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These qualitative and economic factors include considerationeconomic and business conditions, the nature and volume of the following: levels ofportfolio, and trends in delinquencieslending terms and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and termsseverity of loans; effects on any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations. The following portfolio segments have been identified: Construction Loans, Commercial Real Estate Loans, Multi-Family Real Estate Loans, One-to-four Family Real Estate Loans, Commercial & Industrial Loans and Consumer Loans.
The risk characteristics of each of the identified portfolio segments are as follows:
Construction — Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, additional funds may be required to be advanced in excess of the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building.
If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the value of the building may be insufficient to assure full repayment if liquidation is required. If foreclosure is required on a building before or at completionpast due to a default, there can be no assurance that all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs will be recovered.
Commercial Real Estate — Commercial real estate loans are secured by nonresidential real estate and generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than residential real estate loans. Repayment of commercial real estate loans depends on the global cash flow analysis of the borrower and the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the
(continued)
77

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
value of the underlying property. Of primary concern in commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the cash flow from the property. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent than residential real estate loans, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Commercial real estate is also subject to adverse market conditions that cause a decrease in market value or lease rates, obsolescence in location or function and market conditions associated with oversupply of units in a specific region.
Multi-family Real Estate — Multi-family real estate loans are secured by multi-family real estate and generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than residential real estate loans. Repayment of multi-family real estate loans depends on the cash flow analysis of the property, occupancy rates, and unemployment rates, combined with the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. Payments on these loans depend on successful operation and management of the properties, and repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.
One-to-Four Family Real Estate — One-to-four family loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment income or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable. Repayment of one-to-four family loans is subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy leading to increased default rates and decreased market values from oversupply in a geographic area. In general, these loans depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
Commercial & Industrial — Commercial & Industrial loans are generally of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value.
Consumer — The Bank formed a Consumer Lending Joint Venture with Bankers HealthCare Group (BHG) and made loans to Licensed Medical Professionals for consumer purposes on an unsecured basis. Consumer loans are comprised of these loans and student loans. As a result, repayment of such loans are subject, to a greater extent than loans secured by collateral, to the financial condition of the borrower.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary, based on changes in economic conditions or any other factors used in management’s determination. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’sCompany’s ALLL.

76

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

When a loan is modified and concessions have been made to the original contractual terms, such as reductions in interest rate or deferral of interest or principal payments, due to the borrower’s financial condition, the modification is known as a TDR. TDRs are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a TDR is a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For TDRs that subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses. Such

On March 22, 2020, the banking regulators and the FASB issued guidance to financial institutions who were working with borrowers affected by COVID-19 (the “COVID-19 Guidance”). The COVID-19 Guidance indicated that regulatory agencies will not criticize institutions for working with borrowers and will not direct banks to automatically categorize all COVID-19 related loan modifications as TDRs. In addition, the COVID-19 Guidance noted that modification or deferral programs mandated by the federal or a state government related to COVID-19 would not be in the scope of Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 310-40 – Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (“ASC 310-40”), such as state programs that require all institutions within that state to suspend mortgage payments for a specified period.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. Section 4013 of the CARES Act, “Temporary Relief from Troubled Debt Restructurings,” allowed banks to temporarily suspend certain requirements under GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period that ended on January 1, 2022. During this period, a bank may requirehave elected to account for modifications on certain loans under Section 4013 of the BankCARES Act or, if a loan modification is not eligible under Section 4013, a bank may use the criteria in the COVID-19 Guidance to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

determine when a loan modification is not a TDR in accordance with ASC 310-40.

Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to operations based upon the principal amounts outstanding. Loans are normally placed on non-accrual when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when principal or interest is delinquent for 90 days or more. Delinquent status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. Any unpaid interest previously accrued on those loans is reversed from income. Interest payments received on such loans are applied as a reduction of the loan principal balance when the collectability of principal, wholly or partially, is in doubt. Interest payments received may be deferred on nonaccrualnon-accrual loans in which the principal balance is deemed to be collectible. Interest income is recognized when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and the loans are returned to accrual status.

The following portfolio segments have been identified: CRE loans, Construction loans, Multi-Family loans, One-to Four -Family loans, C&I, and Consumer loans.

The risk characteristics of each of the identified portfolio segments are as follows:

Commercial Real Estate — CRE loans are secured by nonresidential real estate and generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than residential real estate loans. Repayment of CRE loans depends on the cash flow of the borrower and the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s profitability, and the value of the underlying property. Of primary concern in CRE lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the cash flows from the property. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent than residential real estate loans, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. CRE is also subject to adverse market conditions that cause a decrease in market value or lease rates, obsolescence in location or function and market conditions associated with oversupply of units in a specific region.

Construction — Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. During the

77

(continued)
78

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For

construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the years ended December 31, 2017estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, additional funds may be required to be advanced in excess of the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building.

If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the value of the building may be insufficient to assure full repayment if liquidation is required. If foreclosure is required on a building before or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that all of the unpaid balance of, and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 1accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs will be recovered.

Multi-family — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Multi-family real estate loans are secured by real estate of five or more units and generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than residential real estate loans. Repayment of multi-family real estate loans depends on the cash flow analysis of the property, occupancy rates, and unemployment rates, combined with the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s profitability, and the value of the underlying property. Payments on these loans depend on successful operation and management of the properties, and repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market and/or the economy.

One-to Four-Family — One-to four-family loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment income or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable. Repayment of one-to four-family loans is subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy leading to increased default rates and decreased market values, including from oversupply in a geographic area. In general, these loans depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

Commercial & Industrial — C&I loans are generally of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flows of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value.

Consumer — Historically, the Company purchased loans made to licensed medical professionals on an unsecured basis. However, this practice was discontinued in 2019. Consumer loans are comprised of these loans and student loans, which were also purchased. As a result, repayment of such loans are subject, to a greater extent than loans secured by collateral, to the financial condition of the borrower.

Goodwill:   

Goodwill and certain other intangibles generally arise from business combinations accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill and other intangibles deemed to have indefinite lives generated from business combinations are not subject to amortization and are instead tested for impairment not less than annually or more frequently if events and circumstances existsexist that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company has selectedchanged its annual goodwill impairment testing date from December 31 asto October 1 to better align with the date to performtiming of our annual planning process. Accordingly, management determined that the annualchange in accounting principle is preferable under the circumstance. This change has been applied starting with the October 1, 2022 impairment test. This change was not material to our consolidated financial statements as it did not delay, accelerate, or avoid any potential goodwill impairment charges.

78

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The goodwill of $9.7 million is associated with a purchase of the prepaid third-party debit card business. The Company performed anBased on the Company’s annual impairment assessment, and determined thatassessments no impairment of goodwill existsexisted as of October 1, 2022 or December 31, 2017 and 2016.

2021.

Stock-Based Compensation:   

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock awards issued to employees,units, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of options. The market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.awards and restricted stock units. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with gradedtime-based vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

The Company also awards PRSUs to employees. The PRSUs are classified as either equity or a liability, depending on certain criteria provided in ASC 718, Stock Based Compensation. This classification affects whether the measurement of fair value is fixed (i.e., measured only once) on the grant date or whether fair value will be remeasured each reporting period until settled. On the grant date, the estimate of equity-classified awards’ fair value would be fixed, the cumulative amount of previously recognized compensation cost would be adjusted, and the Company would no longer have to remeasure the award. If the award is liability-classified, the awards would continue to be marked to fair value each reporting period until settlement. The Company recognizes compensation cost for awards with performance conditions if and when it concludes that it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. The Company assesses the probability of vesting (i.e., that the performance conditions will be met) at each reporting period and, if required, adjusts compensation cost based on its probability assessment.

Concentrations of Credit Risk:   

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the BankCompany to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of temporary cash investments including due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks and real estate loans receivable. A significant portion of real estate loans are collateralized by property in the New York Metropolitan area. The ultimate collectability of these loans may be susceptible to changes in the real estate market in this area.

Leases

As of December 31, 2022, the Company follows ASC 842, Leases. The Company’s real estate leases are recognized as operating leases. The related ROU lease assets and liabilities are recognized to reflect our right to use the underlying assets and contractual obligations associated with future rent payments. ROU assets are included in other assets and lease liabilities are included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Operating lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. On a periodic basis, ROU assets are assessed for impairment and an impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying amount of the ROU asset is not recoverable. See “NOTE 3 — SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS,” for a discussion on the adoption of this ASC.

Prior to 2022, operating leases were not recognized on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. Operating lease expense for lease payments were recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

79

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Premises and Equipment:   

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets by the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from three to tenthirty years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the terms of the respective leases or the estimated lives of the improvements.

Other Investments:   

Other investments includesinclude FRB stock,and FHLB (“FHLB”) stock, and investments in the Solomon Hess SBA Loan Fund (“SBA Loan Fund” or “Fund”).stock. The BankCompany is a member of the FRB and the FHLB systems. Memberssystem. FHLB members are required to own a certain amount ofmembership stock and purchase activity-based stock that is based on the level of borrowings and other factors.outstanding borrowings. FRB and FHLB stock are carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income. The Bank invested in a SBA Loan Fund for the purpose of satisfying its CRA lending requirements. An investor can redeem its interest in the Fund for the balance of its capital account at any quarter end assuming the investor provides the Fund 60 days’ notice. The investment in this Fund is recorded at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment. The Company held FRB and FHLB stock of $6.7$11.4 million and $7.6$9.2 million, and a SBA Loan Fund investment of  $5.0 millionrespectively, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Also included in Other Investments as2022. As of December 31, 2017 is $2.02021, the Company held FRB and FHLB stock of $7.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively. Other investments also include a $1.0 million investment in certificatesThe Disability Opportunity Fund, which is an equity equivalent investment in a community development financial institution.

Derivatives

During 2020, the Company entered into an interest rate cap derivative that, based on the Company’s intentions and belief as to the likely effectiveness as a hedge, was designated as a cash flow hedge. A cash flow hedge is a hedge of deposit with maturities greater than three months.

a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability. For a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of the derivative that are not highly effective in hedging the changes in expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized immediately in current earnings. The amounts are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line item that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item when the hedged item affects earnings.

The Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedged transactions at the inception of the hedging relationship. The documentation includes linking the cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific forecasted transactions or group of forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, or treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.

When a cash flow hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transactions are still expected to occur, gains or losses that were in accumulated other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods in which the hedged transactions will affect earnings. If the forecasted transaction is deemed probable to not occur, the derivative gain or loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income is reclassified into current earnings.

Comprehensive Income:   

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses onand reclassification to earnings related to AFS securities available for sale which are also recognized as separate componentsand unrealized gain (loss) related to the cash flow hedges.

80

Table of equity.Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Restrictions on Cash:   

Cash on hand or on deposit with the FRB was required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements. Total amounts on deposit with the FRB were $230.3requirements was $226.7 million and $57.3 million$2.3 billion as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. ThereAlso included in cash was $662,000 and $659,000 of cash pledged for a collateral account as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In addition, there was $6.4$13.3 million and $3.6$10.8 million of cash held in escrow and collateral accounts for third-party debit card program managers as ofat December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.

(continued)
79

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended Additionally, there was $693,000 and $683,000 of cash pledged for a related collateral account at December 31, 20172022 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
2021, respectively.

Earnings per Common Share:   

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the applicable period, excludingincluding outstanding participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number shares determined for the basic computation plus the dilutive effect of potential common shares issuable under certain stock compensation plans. Unvested share-based payments awards and preferred shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company has determined that its outstanding non-vested stock awards are participating securities.

Income Taxes:   

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when these differences reverse. The primary temporary difference relates to allowance for loan losses. A valuation allowance is recorded, as necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to an estimated amount expected to be realized.

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.

The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments:   

Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:   

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broadliquid markets for particularcertain items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

81

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Loss Contingencies:   

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.

Reclassifications:   

Some items in the prior year financial statements may have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Reclassification had no effect on prior year net income or stockholders’ equity.

Operating segments:   segment

While the chief decision-makersdepartment heads monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Operating segments are aggregated into one as operating results for all segments are similar. Accordingly, all of the financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards:

NOTE 3 — SUMMARY OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Pursuant to the Jumpstart Our Business StartupsJOBS Act, (“JOBS Act”), Emerging Growth Company (“EGC”)an EGC is permitted to electprovided the option to adopt new or revised accounting guidance using adoption dates of nonpublic entities.standards that may be issued by the FASB or the SEC either (i) within the same periods as those otherwise applicable to non-EGCs or (ii) within the same time periods as private companies. The Company elected delayed effective dates of recently issued accounting standards.

(continued)
80

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the yearsCompany’s EGC status ended on December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” implements a common revenue standard that clarifies2022, which was the principles for recognizing revenue. The core principlelast day of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transferfiscal year of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to whichCompany following the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should applyfifth anniversary of the following steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In August 2016, the FASB deferred the effective date of the ASU by one year which means ASU 2014-09 will be effective forfirst sale of common equity securities of the Company on January 1, 2019. Management is inpursuant to an effective registration statement under the processSecurities Act of evaluating revenue streams to determine the impact the ASU could have on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, an amendment to Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). The objectives of the ASU are to: (1) require equity investments to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (2) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, (3) eliminate the requirement to disclose methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (4) require the use of the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments, and (5) clarify the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments — Overall — Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities, an amendment to ASU 2016-01. The amendments clarify certain aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2016-01. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has evaluated the impact of ASU 2016-01 and 2018-03 upon adoption as of January 1, 2019 and has concluded that there is not a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
1933.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic(ASC 842). ASU 2016-02, which requires companies that lease valuable assetslessees to recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a corresponding ROU asset representing the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term on theirthe balance sheets thesheet. The Company adopted this guidance on December 31, 2022 with an effective date of January 1, 2022. This guidance was adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The Company recorded lease assets and liabilities generated by contracts longer than a year. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019,of $44.3 million and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, however, early adoption is permitted. Under ASU 2016-02,$48.4 million, respectively. In accordance with the Company will recognize a right-of-use assetguidance, $4.1 million of deferred rent was reclassified from liabilities and a lease obligation liability onnetted with the consolidated balance sheet, which will increase the Company’s assets and liabilities. The Company is evaluating other potential impact of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ImprovementsROU asset. There was no cumulative effect adjustment recorded to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The objectives of the ASU are to simplify accounting for the tax consequences of a stock payment and amend the manner in which excess tax benefits and a business’s payments to satisfy the tax obligation for recipients of the shares should be classified. The amendments: (i) allow companies to estimate the number of stock awards they expect to vest, and (ii) revise the withholding requirements for classifying stock awards as equity. For all nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Management expects ASU 2016-09 will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
retained earnings upon adoption.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments Credit Losses (Topic(ASC 326), which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting dateamortized cost to be based on historical experience, current condition, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial

(continued)
81

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
ASU 2016-2013 requires that financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. This guidance also amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-saleAFS debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. For theThe Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2023 using a modified retrospective approach and will record a pre-tax cumulative effect adjustment that will increase the ACL for loans and unfunded commitments by approximately 7% to 11% with a corresponding decrease in retained earnings.

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures. ASU 2022-02 eliminates the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020.experiencing financial difficulty. The Company is currently evaluatingadopted this guidance to determine theeffective January 1, 2023, which did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. The Company expects to recognize a one-time cumulative increase to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the reporting period in which the ASU takes effect, but, cannot yet determine the magnitude of the impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic(ASC 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates the second step in the goodwill impairment test, which requires an entity to

82

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Instead, an entity should recognize an impairment loss if the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, with the impairment loss not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The standard is effective forCompany adopted the Companystandard beginning January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. Management expects ASU 2017-04 willwhich did not have a significantmaterial impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017,2020, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. Today, entities generally amortize the premium over the contractual life2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (ASC 848): Facilitation of the security.Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The new guidance does not change the accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount as discounts continueamendments in this ASU apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be amortized to maturity.discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this ASU No. 2017-08 iswere effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning afterall entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The guidance includes a modified retrospective transition approach under which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made31, 2022. An entity may elect to retained earningsapply the amendments for contract modifications at the instrument level as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the first reporting period in whichdate that the guidance is adopted. Management expects ASU 2017-08 will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On February 14, 2018statements are available to be issued. In January 2021 the FASB issued final guidanceASU 2021-01. The amendments in this ASU clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in ASC 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the formdiscounting transition. Specifically, certain provisions in ASC 848, if elected by an entity, apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-02, which permits — but doesreference rate reform.

In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (ASC 848): Deferral of Sunset Date of Topic 848. ASU 2020-04 defers the sunset date of ASC 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024 because the current relief in ASC 848 did not require — companiescover the current June 30, 2023 intended cessation date for the overnight 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month tenors of USD LIBOR. Management has established a working group to reclassify stranded tax effects caused by 2017 tax reformevaluate the impact of the transition from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. Additionally,LIBOR on the ASU requires new disclosures by all companies, whether they opt to do the reclassification or not. Management expects ASU 2018-02 will not have a significant impact onCompany and its consolidated financial statements. The amendmentsworking group has developed an inventory of impacted contracts and client relationships and is in this update are effective fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,the process of assessing LIBOR alternatives and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018; however, early adoption is permitted.

(continued)
82

how such alternatives may be implemented.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 24 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following tabletables summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of AFS and HTM debt securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2017 and 2016equity investments and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and gross unrecognized gains and losses (dollarsrecognized in earnings (in thousands):

At December 31, 2017Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed securities$24,856$70$(242)$24,684
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations2,809(103)2,706
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations1,581(31)1,550
Municipal bond1,098111,109
CRA mutual fund2,160(52)2,108
Total securities available-for-sale$32,504$81$(428)$32,157
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities$5,403$$(98)$5,305
Foreign government securities2525
Total securities held-to-maturity$5,428$$(98)$5,330
At December 31, 2016Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Available-for-sale
Residential mortgage-backed securities$29,152$165$(290)$29,027
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations5,233(130)5,103
Municipal bond1,122141,136
CRA mutual fund2,115(52)2,063
Total securities available-for-sale$37,622$179$(472)$37,329
Held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities$6,475$$(81)$6,394
Foreign government securities2525
Total securities held-to-maturity$6,500$$(81)$6,419

83

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Gross

Gross

Unrealized/

Unrealized/

Amortized

Unrecognized

Unrecognized

At December 31, 2022

    

Cost

    

Gains

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

Available-for-Sale Securities:

U.S. Government agency securities

$

67,996

$

$

(8,624)

$

59,372

U.S. State and Municipal securities

11,649

(2,437)

9,212

Residential MBS

413,998

279

(75,729)

338,548

Commercial MBS

37,069

10

(2,229)

34,850

Asset-backed securities

3,953

(188)

3,765

Total securities available-for-sale

$

534,665

$

289

$

(89,207)

$

445,747

Held-to-Maturity Securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

$

29,852

$

$

(2,223)

$

27,629

U.S. State and Municipal securities

15,814

(2,609)

13,205

Residential MBS

456,648

(67,027)

389,621

Commercial MBS

8,111

(1,276)

6,835

Total securities held-to-maturity

$

510,425

$

$

(73,135)

$

437,290

Equity Investments:

CRA Mutual Fund

$

2,358

$

$

(310)

$

2,048

Total equity investment securities

$

2,358

$

$

(310)

$

2,048

Gross

Gross

Unrealized/

Unrealized/

Amortized

Unrecognized

Unrecognized

At December 31, 2021

    

Cost

    

Gains

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

Available-for-Sale Securities:

U.S. Government agency securities

$

67,994

$

$

(1,660)

$

66,334

U.S. State and Municipal securities

11,799

(300)

11,499

Residential MBS

476,393

623

(10,465)

466,551

Commercial MBS

17,787

219

(379)

17,627

Asset-backed securities

4,635

(22)

4,613

Total securities available-for-sale

$

578,608

$

842

$

(12,826)

$

566,624

Held-to-Maturity Securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

$

29,811

$

6

$

(43)

$

29,774

U.S. State and Municipal securities

16,055

299

16,354

Residential MBS

328,095

105

(2,259)

325,941

Commercial MBS

8,138

(99)

8,039

Total securities held-to-maturity

$

382,099

$

410

$

(2,401)

$

380,108

Equity Investments:

CRA Mutual Fund

$

2,326

$

$

(53)

$

2,273

Total equity investment securities

$

2,326

$

$

(53)

$

2,273

84

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes the proceeds and associated gains and (losses) from sales and calls of securities and(in thousands):  

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

2020

Proceeds

$

$

43,241

$

141,422

Gross gains

$

$

609

$

3,286

Tax impact

$

$

(197)

$

(1,036)

The tables below summarize, by contractual maturity, the associated gains and losses are listed below (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Proceeds$$2,771$
Gross gains$$40$
Gross losses$$$
There were no sales or calls of securities in the year ended December 31, 2017. The tax provision related to the net realized gain was $17,000 in 2016.
(continued)
83

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 2 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities. The tables do not include the effect of principal repayments or scheduled principal amortization. Equity securities, at year-end December 31, 2017 and 2016 are shown by contractual maturity.primarily investment in mutual funds, have been excluded from the table. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mutual funds and mortgage-backed securities are shown separately (dollars inpenalties (in thousands):
Held to MaturityAvailable for Sale
At December 31, 2017Amortized
Cost
Fair ValueAmortized
Cost
Fair Value
Within one year$$$$
One to five years2525
Five to ten years
Beyond ten years1,0981,109
Total25251,0981,109
Residential mortgage-backed securities$5,403$5,305$24,856$24,684
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations2,8092,706
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations1,5811,550
CRA mutual fund2,1602,108
Total Securities$5,428$5,330$32,504$32,157
Held to MaturityAvailable for Sale
At December 31, 2016Amortized
Cost
Fair ValueAmortized
Cost
Fair Value
Within one year$$$$
One to five years2525
Five to ten years
Beyond ten years1,1221,136
Total25251,1221,136
Residential mortgage-backed securities$6,475$6,394$29,152$29,027
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations5,2335,103
CRA mutual fund2,1152,063
Total Securities$6,500$6,419$37,622$37,329

Held-to-Maturity

Available-for-Sale

At December 31, 2022

    

Amortized Cost

    

Fair Value

    

Amortized Cost

    

Fair Value

Due within 1 year

$

$

$

$

After 1 year through 5 years

29,852

27,630

54,736

48,959

After 5 years through 10 years

9,505

8,130

36,043

32,872

After 10 years

471,068

401,530

443,886

363,916

Total Securities

$

510,425

$

437,290

$

534,665

$

445,747

Held-to-Maturity

Available-for-Sale

At December 31, 2021

    

Amortized Cost

    

Fair Value

    

Amortized Cost

    

Fair Value

Due within 1 year

$

$

$

$

After 1 year through 5 years

29,811

29,774

48,515

47,370

After 5 years through 10 years

9,973

9,912

36,242

36,024

After 10 years

342,315

340,422

493,851

483,230

Total Securities

$

382,099

$

380,108

$

578,608

$

566,624

There were no$25.0 million and $0.0 securities pledged to the FRBNY discount window at December 31, 20172022 and 2016 to secure borrowings.

2021, respectively.

At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, all of the mortgage-backed securitiesResidential and collateralized mortgage obligationsCommercial MBS held by the BankCompany were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, institutions, which the government has affirmed its commitment to support.agencies.

85

(continued)
84

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 2 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
Securities

Debt securities with unrealizedunrealized/unrecognized losses, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, and are as follows (dollars in(in thousands):

Less than 12 Months12 months or moreTotal
At December 31, 2017Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Residential mortgage-backed securities$9,194$(85)$7,738$(157)$16,932$(242)
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations2,706(103)2,706(103)
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations1,550(31)1,550(31)
CRA mutual fund2,108(52)2,108(52)
Total securities available-for-sale$9,194$(85)$14,102$(343)$23,296$(428)
Residential mortgage-backed securities$3,260$(33)$2,045$(65)$5,305$(98)
Total held-to-maturity$3,260$(33)$2,045$(65)$5,305$(98)
Less than 12 Months12 months or moreTotal
At December 31, 2016Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Residential mortgage-backed securities$16,733$(290)$$$16,733$(290)
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations2,887(60)2,216(70)5,103(130)
CRA mutual fund2,063(52)2,063(52)
Total securities available-for-sale$19,620$(350)$4,279$(122)$23,899$(472)
Residential mortgage-backed securities$6,394$(81)$$$6,394$(81)
Total held-to-maturity$6,394$(81)$$$6,394$(81)
Because

Less than 12 Months

12 Months or More

Total

Unrealized/

Unrealized/

Unrealized/

Estimated

Unrecognized

Estimated

Unrecognized

Estimated

Unrecognized

At December 31, 2022

    

Fair Value

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

    

Losses

Available-for-Sale Securities:

U.S. Government agency securities

$

$

$

59,372

$

(8,624)

$

59,372

$

(8,624)

U.S. State and Municipal securities

2,546

(527)

6,666

(1,910)

9,212

(2,437)

Residential MBS

19,576

(1,654)

305,936

(74,075)

325,512

(75,729)

Commercial MBS

13,406

(198)

11,386

(2,031)

24,792

(2,229)

Asset-backed securities

3,765

(188)

3,765

(188)

Total securities available-for-sale

$

35,528

$

(2,379)

$

387,125

$

(86,828)

$

422,653

$

(89,207)

Held-to-Maturity Securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

$

18,683

$

(1,365)

$

8,946

$

(858)

$

27,629

$

(2,223)

U.S. State and Municipal securities

13,205

(2,609)

13,205

(2,609)

Residential MBS

162,960

(19,625)

226,661

(47,402)

389,621

(67,027)

Commercial MBS

6,835

(1,276)

6,835

(1,276)

Asset-backed securities

Total securities held-to-maturity

$

194,848

$

(23,599)

$

242,442

$

(49,536)

$

437,290

$

(73,135)

Less than 12 Months

12 Months or More

Total

Unrealized/

Unrealized/

Unrealized/

Estimated

Unrecognized

Estimated

Unrecognized

Estimated

Unrecognized

At December 31, 2021

    

Fair Value

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

    

Losses

Available-for-Sale Securities:

U.S. Government agency securities

$

29,267

$

(730)

$

37,067

$

(930)

$

66,334

$

(1,660)

U.S. State and Municipal securities

8,372

(300)

8,372

(300)

Residential MBS

423,686

(9,727)

12,931

(738)

436,617

(10,465)

Commercial MBS

11,202

(296)

3,511

(83)

14,713

(379)

Asset-backed securities

4,613

(22)

4,613

(22)

Total securities available-for-sale

$

477,140

$

(11,075)

$

53,509

$

(1,751)

$

530,649

$

(12,826)

Held-to-Maturity Securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

$

9,697

$

(43)

$

$

$

9,697

$

(43)

Residential MBS

301,896

(2,259)

301,896

(2,259)

Commercial MBS

8,039

(99)

8,039

(99)

Total securities held-to-maturity

$

319,632

$

(2,401)

$

$

$

319,632

$

(2,401)

The Company did not consider these securities to be OTTI at December 31, 2022 or 2021 since the decline in fairmarket value iswas attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not to changes in credit quality, and becausequality. In addition, the Company does not have the intentintend to sell these securities and does not believe that it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell these investments until there is a full recovery of the securities before their anticipated recovery,unrealized loss, which may be at maturity. As a result, no impairment loss was recognized during the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired atyears ended December 31, 20172022 or 2021.

At December 31, 2022 and 2016.

At year-end 2017 and 2016,2021, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

86

(continued)
85

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017

NOTE 5 — LOANS

Loans, net of deferred fees and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 3  — LOANS
Net loanscosts, consist of the following as of(in thousands):

At December 31, 

    

2022

2021

Real estate

Commercial

$

3,254,508

$

2,488,382

Construction

143,693

151,791

Multi-family

468,540

355,290

One-to four-family

53,207

57,163

Total real estate loans

3,919,948

3,052,626

Commercial and industrial

908,616

654,535

Consumer

24,931

32,366

Total loans

4,853,495

3,739,527

Deferred fees, net of origination costs

(12,972)

(7,598)

Loans, net of deferred fees and costs

4,840,523

3,731,929

Allowance for loan losses

(44,876)

(34,729)

Net loans

$

4,795,647

$

3,697,200

Included in C&I loans at December 31, 20172022 and 2016 (dollars2021 were $97,000 and $561,000, respectively, of PPP loans. Also included in thousands):

At December 31,
20172016
Real estate
Commercial$783,745$547,711
Construction36,96029,447
Multifamily190,097117,373
One-to-four family25,56826,480
Total Real Estate1,036,370721,011
Commercial and industrial340,001315,870
Consumer44,59518,825
Total loans1,420,9661,055,706
Deferred fees(1,070)(1,160)
Allowance for loan losses(14,887)(11,815)
Net loans at the end of the year$1,405,009$1,042,731
C&I loans at December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $0.0 and $4.1 million, respectively, of loans held for sale, measured at the lower of cost or fair value.  

The following tables representpresent the changesactivity in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,ALLL by portfolio segment (dollars in thousands).segment. The portfolio segments represent the categories that the BankCompany uses to determine its allowance for loan losses:ALLL (in thousands):

Commercial

Commercial

One-to four-

Year ended December 31, 2022

    

Real Estate

    

& Industrial

    

Construction

    

Multi-family

    

Family

    

Consumer

    

Total

Allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance

$

22,216

$

7,708

$

2,105

$

2,156

$

140

$

404

$

34,729

Provision (credit) for loan losses

7,280

2,540

(122)

667

(35)

(214)

10,116

Loans charged-off

Recoveries

26

5

31

Total ending allowance balance

$

29,496

$

10,274

$

1,983

$

2,823

$

105

$

195

$

44,876

Commercial

Commercial

One-to four-

Year ended December 31, 2021

    

Real Estate

    

& Industrial

    

Construction

    

Multi-family

    

Family

    

Consumer

    

Total

Allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance

$

17,243

$

12,123

$

1,593

$

2,661

$

206

$

1,581

$

35,407

Provision (credit) for loan losses

4,973

24

512

(505)

(66)

(1,122)

3,816

Loans charged-off

(4,764)

(55)

(4,819)

Recoveries

325

325

Total ending allowance balance

$

22,216

$

7,708

$

2,105

$

2,156

$

140

$

404

$

34,729

December 31, 2017Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
& Industrial
ConstructionMulti
Family
One-to-four
Family
ConsumerTotal
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance$5,206$5,364$409$620$109$107$11,815
Provision for loan losses1,9304,093110536293617,059
Loans charged-off(3,879)(108)(3,987)
Recoveries
Total ending allowance balance$7,136$5,578$519$1,156$138$360$14,887
December 31, 2016Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
& Industrial
ConstructionMulti
Family
One-to-four
Family
ConsumerTotal
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance$3,650$4,254$589$986$444$19$9,942
Provision (credit) for loan
losses
1,5566,640(180)(366)322888,060
Loans charged-off(5,530)(659)(6,189)
Recoveries22
Total ending allowance balance$5,206$5,364$409$620$109$107$11,815

87

(continued)
86

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 3  — LOANS (Continued)
December 31, 2015Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
& Industrial
ConstructionMulti
Family
One-to-four
Family
ConsumerTotal
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance$3,283$3,106$269$778$480$$7,916
Provision (credit) for loan
losses
3671,148320208(47)192,015
Loans charged-off
Recoveries1111
Total ending allowance balance$3,650$4,254$589$986$444$19$9,942
Total charge offs were $4.0 million, $6.2 and $0 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively. Included in the charge offs for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were write downs associated with taxi medallion loans of  $3.7 million and $5.1 million, respectively.

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan lossesALLL and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as(in thousands):

Commercial

Commercial

One-to four-

At December 31, 2022

    

Real Estate

    

& Industrial

    

Construction

    

Multi-family

    

Family

    

Consumer

    

Total

Allowance for loan losses:

Individually evaluated for impairment

$

$

$

$

$

$

24

$

24

Collectively evaluated for impairment

29,496

10,274

1,983

2,823

105

171

44,852

Total ending allowance balance

$

29,496

$

10,274

$

1,983

$

2,823

$

105

$

195

$

44,876

Loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment

$

26,740

$

$

$

$

899

$

24

$

27,663

Collectively evaluated for impairment

3,227,768

908,616

143,693

468,540

52,308

24,907

4,825,832

Total ending loan balance

$

3,254,508

$

908,616

$

143,693

$

468,540

$

53,207

$

24,931

$

4,853,495

Commercial

Commercial

One-to four-

At December 31, 2021

    

Real Estate

    

& Industrial

    

Construction

    

Multi-family

    

Family

    

Consumer

    

Total

Allowance for loan losses:

Individually evaluated for impairment

$

$

$

$

$

26

$

170

$

196

Collectively evaluated for impairment

22,216

7,708

2,105

2,156

114

234

34,533

Total ending allowance balance

$

22,216

$

7,708

$

2,105

$

2,156

$

140

$

404

$

34,729

Loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment

$

38,518

$

$

$

$

946

$

302

$

39,766

Collectively evaluated for impairment

2,449,864

654,535

151,791

355,290

56,217

32,064

3,699,761

Total ending loan balance

$

2,488,382

$

654,535

$

151,791

$

355,290

$

57,163

$

32,366

$

3,739,527

88

At December 31, 2017Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
& Industrial
ConstructionMulti
Family
One-to-four
Family
ConsumerTotal
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment$$$$$9$77$86
Collectively evaluated for impairment7,1365,5785191,156129283$14,801
Total ending allowance balance$7,136$5,578$519$1,156$138$360$14,887
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment$2,368$$$$3,566$155$6,089
Collectively evaluated for impairment781,377340,00136,960190,09722,00244,4401,414,877
Total ending loan balance$783,745$340,001$36,960$190,097$25,568$44,595$1,420,966

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 3  — LOANS (Continued)
At December 31, 2016Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
& Industrial
ConstructionMulti
Family
One-to-four
Family
ConsumerTotal
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment$$366$$$10$$376
Collectively evaluated for impairment5,2064,99840962099107$11,439
Total ending allowance balance$5,206$5,364$409$620$109$107$11,815
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment$5,504$4,915$$$1,130$$11,549
Collectively evaluated for impairment542,207310,95529,447117,37325,35018,8251,044,157
Total ending loan balance$547,711$315,870$29,447$117,373$26,480$18,825$1,055,706

The following tables present information related to loans determined to be impaired by class of loans as of andindividually evaluated for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars inimpairment (in thousands):

At December 31, 2017
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial & industrial$$$$2,928$
One-to-four family686556956321
Consumer15515577758
Total$841$711$86$3,566$29
Without an allowance recorded:
Commercial & industrial$$$$5,367$229
Commercial real estate2,8902,368093843
One-to-four family3,1573,01001,54787
Total$6,047$5,378$$7,852$359
(continued)
88

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 3  — LOANS (Continued)
At December 31, 2016
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial & industrial$8,783$3,660$366$6,330$207
One-to-four family6945651056521
Total$9,477$4,225$376$6,895$228
Without an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate$5,974$5,504$$5,814$267
Commercial & industrial1,2551,2551,34054
One-to-four family71356556523
Total$7,942$7,324$$7,719$344
At December 31, 2015
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial & industrial$1,933$1,933$134$1,983$136
One-to-four family1,6941,2232931,22321
Total$3,627$3,156$427$3,206$157
Without an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate$2,155$1,806$$1,833$93
Commercial & industrial1,4251,4251,51061
Multi-family5,9715,9716,010235
One-to-four family71356556521
Total$10,264$9,767$$9,918$410
. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and loan origination fees, net due to immateriality. Cash basis interest income equals interest income recognized.fees.

At December 31, 2022

Year ended December 31, 2022

Allowance 

Unpaid

for Loan

Average

Interest

 Principal

Recorded

Losses

 Recorded

 Income

    

Balance

    

 Investment

    

Allocated

Investment

    

Recognized

With an allowance recorded:

Consumer

$

24

$

24

$

24

79

Total

$

24

$

24

$

24

$

79

$

Without an allowance recorded:

One-to four-family

$

1,176

$

899

$

$

832

$

31

CRE

27,984

26,740

30,142

1,041

Total

$

29,160

$

27,639

$

$

30,974

$

1,072

At December 31, 2021

Year ended December 31, 2021

Allowance 

Unpaid

for Loan

Average

Interest

 Principal

Recorded

Losses

 Recorded

 Income

    

Balance

    

 Investment

    

Allocated

Investment

    

Recognized

With an allowance recorded:

One-to four-family

$

577

$

447

$

26

$

462

$

21

Consumer

302

302

170

1,766

84

C&I

2,726

Total

$

879

$

749

$

196

$

4,954

$

105

Without an allowance recorded:

One-to four-family

$

646

$

499

$

$

509

$

26

CRE

38,518

38,518

15,975

325

C&I

77

Total

$

39,164

$

39,017

$

$

16,561

$

351

Interest on non-accrual loans not recognized was $88,000 and $57,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.

89

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2020

Year ended December 31, 2020

Allowance 

Unpaid

for Loan

Average

Interest

 Principal

Recorded

Losses

 Recorded

 Income

    

Balance

    

 Investment

    

Allocated

Investment

    

Recognized

With an allowance recorded:

One-to four-family

$

610

$

480

$

53

$

491

$

19

Consumer

2,197

2,197

1,203

1,503

88

C&I

4,192

4,192

3,662

3,456

Total

$

6,999

$

6,869

$

4,918

$

5,450

$

107

Without an allowance recorded:

One-to four-family

$

666

$

519

$

$

996

$

20

CRE

10,345

10,345

2,360

38

C&I

951

Total

$

11,011

$

10,864

$

$

4,307

$

58

For a loan to be considered impaired, management determines after review whether it is probable that the BankCompany will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management applies its normal loan review procedures in making these judgments. Impaired loans include individually classified nonaccrualnon-accrual loans and TDRs. Impairment is determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. For loans that are collateral dependent, the fair value of the collateral is used to determine the fair value of the loan. The fair value of the collateral is determined based on recent appraised values. The fair value of the collateral or present value of expected cash flows is compared to the carrying value to determine if any write-down or specific loan loss allowance allocation is required.

(continued)
89

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For discussion on modification of loans to borrowers impacted by COVID-19, refer to the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 3  — LOANS (Continued)
“COVID-19 Loan Modifications” section herein.

The following tables present the recorded investment in non-accrual loans, and loans past due over 90 days and still on accrualaccruing by class of loans as(in thousands):

Loans Past Due

Over 90 Days

At December 31, 2022

    

Nonaccrual

Still Accruing

Consumer

$

24

$

Total

$

24

$

Loans Past Due

Over 90 Days

At December 31, 2021

Nonaccrual

Still Accruing

Commercial real estate

$

9,984

$

Consumer

37

265

Total

$

10,021

$

265

90

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interest income that would have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 20172022, 2021 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 2017NonaccrualLoans Past Due
Over 90 Days
Still Accruing
Commercial real estate$787$
Commercial & industrial
One-to-four family2,447
Consumer155
Total$3,389$
At December 31, 2016NonaccrualLoans Past Due
Over 90 Days
Still Accruing
Commercial & industrial$3,660$
2020, had non-accrual loans been current according to their original terms, was immaterial.

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in(in thousands):

At December 31, 201730 – 59 Days60 – 89 DaysGreater than
90 days
Total Past
Due
Loans not
Past Due
Total
Commercial real estate$836$$787$1,623$782,122$783,745
Commercial & industrial85142227339,774340,001
Construction36,96036,960
Multifamily190,097190,097
One-to-four family25,56825,568
Consumer1492115532544,27044,595
Total$1,070$163$942$2,175$1,418,791$1,420,966
At December 31, 201630 – 59 Days60 – 89 DaysGreater than
90 days
Total Past
Due
Loans not
Past Due
Total
Commercial real estate$$958$$958$546,753$547,711
Commercial & industrial143,9223,936311,934315,870
Construction29,44729,447
Multifamily117,373117,373
One-to-four family26,48026,480
Consumer343418,79118,825
Total$14$4,914$$4,928$1,050,778$1,055,706

90

30-59

60-89

Days and

Total past

Current

At December 31, 2022

    

Days

    

Days

    

greater

    

due

    

loans

    

Total

Commercial real estate

$

$

24,000

$

$

24,000

$

3,230,508

$

3,254,508

Commercial & industrial

37

37

908,579

908,616

Construction

143,693

143,693

Multi-family

8,000

8,000

460,540

468,540

One-to four-family

53,207

53,207

Consumer

21

24

45

24,886

24,931

Total

$

8,058

$

24,000

$

24

$

32,082

$

4,821,413

$

4,853,495

90

30-59

60-89

Days and

Total past

Current

At December 31, 2021

    

Days

    

Days

    

greater

    

due

    

loans

    

Total

Commercial real estate

$

$

$

9,984

$

9,984

$

2,478,398

$

2,488,382

Commercial & industrial

151

151

654,384

654,535

Construction

151,791

151,791

Multi-family

355,290

355,290

One-to four-family

57,163

57,163

Consumer

93

94

302

489

31,877

32,366

Total

$

244

$

94

$

10,286

$

10,624

$

3,728,903

$

3,739,527

Troubled Debt Restructurings:

Restructurings

Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructuringsTDRs and classified as impaired.

Included in impaired loans at both December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were recorded investment of  $2.7$1.2 million and $7.9$1.3 million, respectively, of loans modified as TDRs. The ALLL for TDRs was $0.0 and $26,000 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. All TDRs at December 31, 2022 and 2021 were performing in troubled debt restructurings. The Company has allocated $9,000 and

(continued)
90

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Foraccordance with their restructured terms. During the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 3  — LOANS (Continued)
$10,000 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been2021, there were no payment defaults on any loans previously identified as TDRs. There were no loans modified as TDRs as ofa TDR during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2022 or 2021. The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2022 to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as TDRs.
There were no loans modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 the terms of certain loans were modified as TDRs. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan; an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. Modifications involving a reduction of the stated interest rate and/or an extension of the maturity date were for a period of three to five years.
The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the years ended 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
At December 31, 2016Number of LoansPre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Troubled debt restructurings:
Commercial Real Estate1$3,875$3,875
Total1$3,875$3,875
At December 31, 2015Number of LoansPre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Troubled debt restructurings:
Commercial & Industrial1$1,933$1,933
Total1$1,933$1,933
Since there were no modified troubled debt restructurings in 2017, there is no impact on the allowance for loan losses and charge-offs during the year ending December 31, 2017. The Bank has allocated $10,000 and $153,000 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In 2017, 2016 and 2015, there were no new loans modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification. A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed underpursuant to the Bank’sCompany’s internal underwriting policy. The following table presents the recorded investment in TDRs by class of loans (in thousands):

December 31, 

2022

2021

Commercial real estate

$

325

$

342

One-to four-family

899

946

Total

$

1,224

$

1,288

91

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Credit Quality Indicators:

Indicators

The BankCompany categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The BankExcept for one-to four-family loans and consumer loans, the Company analyzes all loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk at least annually. For one-to four-family loans and consumer loans, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented. An analysis is performed on a quarterly basis for loans classified as special mention, substandard, or doubtful. The BankCompany uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention — -Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’sCompany’s credit position at some future date.

(continued)
91

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 3  — LOANS (Continued)

Substandard — -Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institutionCompany will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful — -Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individuallyclassified as part of the above described process are considered to be pass-rated loans. Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows (in thousands):

Special

At December 31, 2022

    

Pass

    

Mention

    

Substandard

    

Doubtful

Total

Commercial real estate

$

3,192,212

$

35,881

$

26,415

$

$

3,254,508

Commercial & industrial

876,867

31,749

908,616

Construction

143,693

143,693

Multi-family

468,540

468,540

Total

$

4,681,312

$

67,630

$

26,415

$

$

4,775,357

Special

At December 31, 2021

    

Pass

    

Mention

    

Substandard

    

Doubtful

Total

Commercial real estate

$

2,449,864

$

342

$

38,176

$

$

2,488,382

Commercial & industrial

646,251

4,177

4,107

654,535

Construction

151,791

151,791

Multi-family

355,290

355,290

Total

$

3,603,196

$

4,519

$

42,283

$

$

3,649,998

COVID-19 Loan Modifications

As of December 31, 2022, the Company had one loan amounting to $20.8 million, or 0.43% of total loans, that was modified in accordance with the COVID-19 Guidance and the CARES Act. As of December 31, 2022, related principal payment deferrals were $20.8 million, or 0.43% of total loans, while none were full payment deferrals.

92

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had 8 loans amounting to $48.9 million, or 1.31% of total loans, that were modified in accordance with the COVID-19 Guidance and the CARES Act. As of December 31, 2021, principal payment deferrals were $39.1 million, or 1.05% of total loans, while full payment deferrals were $9.9 million, or 0.26% of total loans.

NOTE 6 — LEASES

The Company leases its corporate office, banking centers and loan production offices. The following tables present the Company’s lease cost and other information related to its operating leases (dollars in thousands):

At December 31, 2017PassSpecial
Mention
SubstandardDoubtfulTotal
Commercial real estate$777,410$4,369$1,966$$783,745
Commercial & industrial331,7758,226340,001
Construction36,96036,960
Multifamily190,097190,097
Total$1,336,242$12,595$1,966$$1,350,803
At December 31, 2016PassSpecial
Mention
SubstandardDoubtfulTotal
Commercial real estate$542,206$4,293$1,212$$547,711
Commercial & industrial309,2952,9153,660315,870
Construction29,44729,447
Multifamily117,373117,373
Total$998,321$7,208$4,872$$1,010,401
For one-to-four family loans and consumer loans, the Bank evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by performance status. Non-performing loans are loans past due over 90 days or more still accruing interest and loans on non-accrual status.

At December 31, 

2022

Supplemental balance sheet information:

   

Lease assets

$

44,339

Lease liabilities

$

48,364

Weighted average remaining lease term in years

 

11

Weighted average discount rate

 

2.26

%

Year Ended

December 31, 

2022

Operating Lease cost

$

5,405

Cash paid for amount included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities

$

4,864

The following table presents the recorded investment in one-to-four family and consumer loans based on performance statusremaining maturity of lease liabilities as well as the reconciliation of undiscounted lease payments to the discounted operating lease liabilities (in thousands):

At December 31, 

2022

Lease liabilities maturing in:

2023

$

5,202

2024

 

4,976

2025

 

4,990

2026

 

5,008

2027

4,632

Thereafter

30,276

Total

$

55,084

Less: Present value discount

(6,720)

Total lease liabilities

$

48,364

Total rent expense for the year ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):2020 was $4.9 million and $4.7 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2017PerformingNon-PerformingTotal
One-to-four family$23,121$2,447$25,568
Consumer44,44015544,595
Total$67,561$2,602$70,163
At December 31, 2016PerformingNon-PerformingTotal
One-to-four family$26,480$$26,480
Consumer18,82518,825
Total$45,305$$45,305

93

(continued)
92

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 47 — PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in(in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
20172016
Furniture and Equipment (useful life of 3 to 7 years)$7,376$5,973
Leasehold Improvements (useful life of 3 to 10 years)10,82010,012
Total Premises and Equipment18,19615,985
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(11,928)(10,950)
Total Premises and Equipment, net$6,268$5,035

At December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Furniture and Equipment

$

14,451

$

13,032

Land, buildings and improvements

13,479

Leasehold Improvements

 

20,595

 

16,266

Total Premises and Equipment

 

48,525

 

29,298

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(16,656)

 

(14,182)

Total Premises and Equipment, net

$

31,869

$

15,116

Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $978,000, $785,000$2.5 million, $2.4 million and $696,000$2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020, respectively.

NOTE 58 — DEPOSITS

Deposits consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in(in thousands):

At December 31,
20172016
Core Deposits
Noninterest bearing demand accounts$812,497$403,402
Money market484,589482,393
Savings accounts27,02417,472
Total core deposits1,324,110903,267
Time Deposits
Time deposits under $100,00073,43769,188
Time deposits $100,000 and over6,80821,325
Total deposits$1,404,355$993,780

At December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

 

  

 

  

Noninterest bearing demand accounts

$

2,422,151

$

3,668,673

Money market

 

2,792,554

 

2,666,983

Savings accounts

 

11,144

 

20,930

Time deposits

 

52,063

 

78,986

Total deposits

$

5,277,912

$

6,435,572

Time deposits greater than $250,000 at December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $38.8$30.8 million and $21.3$39.4 million, respectively.

The Bank had $103.1 million and $97.3 million of brokered deposits as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which were primarily included in money market and savings accounts.

The following aretable presents the scheduled annual maturities of time deposits as(in thousands):

At December 31, 

2022

2023

    

$

37,614

2024

 

11,263

2025

 

2,362

2026

 

349

2027

 

475

Total time deposits

$

52,063

94


METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For

NOTE 9 — BORROWINGS

Federal Funds Purchased and FHLB Advances

Federal funds purchased and FHLBNY advances consisted of the years endedfollowing (in thousands):

Interest expense

At December 31, 

Year Ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Federal funds purchased

$

150,000

$

$

601

$

$

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances

$

100,000

$

$

292

$

$

1,742

Federal funds purchased are generally overnight transactions and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.65% at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 6 — BORROWINGS
At year-end,2022. The FHLBNY advances from the FHLB were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
20172016
Maturing in 2018, fixed rate at rates from 1.21% to 3.23%, weighted averaging 1.53%$42,198$
Maturing 2017 through 2018, fixed rate at rates from 0.77% to 3.23%, weighted averaging 0.95%78,418
Total��$42,198$78,418
Each advance is payable at itsDecember 31, 2022 have a maturity date withof January 11, 2023 and a prepayment penalty for fixed interest rate advances. The advances are collateralized by mortgage loans under a blanket lien agreement in the amount of approximately $263.4 million and $204.4 million as of4.58%.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Based on this collateral and the Company’s holdings of FHLB stock,2022, the Company is eligible to borrow an additional totalhad available borrowing capacity of approximately $221.2$984.4 million asat the FHLBNY, and available borrowing capacity of December 31, 2017.

FHLB advances that mature over$137.6 million at the next five years and thereafter as follows (dollars in thousands):
Principal
2018$42,198
2019
2020
2021
2022
Total$42,198
FRBNY discount window.

Trust Preferred Securities Payable:   

On December 7, 2005, the Company established MetBank Capital Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust I”). The Company ownsreceived all of the common capital securitiesstock of Trust I in exchange for contributed capital of $310,000. Trust I issued $10$10.0 million of preferred capital securities to investors in a private transaction and invested the proceeds, combined with the proceeds from the sale of Trust I’s common capital securities, in the Company through the purchase of $10.310$10.3 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”) issued by the Company. The Debentures, the sole assets of Trust I, mature on December 9, 2035 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.82% for the first five years, then at a floating rate of 3-monththree-month LIBOR plus 1.85%. The Debentures are callable after five years.at any time. The interest rates were 3.21%5.93% and 2.73%1.97% as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.

On July 14, 2006, the Company established MetBank Capital Trust II, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust II”). The Company ownsreceived all of the common capital securitiesstock of Trust II in exchange for contributed capital of $310,000. Trust II issued $10 million of preferred capital securities to investors in a private transaction and invested the proceeds, combined with the proceeds from the sale of Trust II’s common capital securities, in the Company through the purchase of $10.310$10.3 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”“Debentures II”) issued by the Company. The Debentures II, the sole assets of Trust II, mature on October 7, 2036, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.61% for the first five years, then at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.00%. The Debentures II are callable after five years.at any time. The interest rates were 3.36%6.08% and 2.88%2.12% as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.

The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of these trusts,trusts; therefore, the trusts are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements; the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability on

(continued)
94

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 6 — BORROWINGS (Continued)
the consolidated statements of financial condition.statements. Interest on the subordinated debentures may be deferred by the Company at any time or from time to time for a period not exceeding 20twenty consecutive quarterly payments (5 years), provided there is no event of default. At the end of the deferral period, the Company must pay accrued interest, at which point it may elect a new deferral period provided that no deferral may extend beyond maturity.

The investments in the common capital securitiesstock of Trust I and Trust II are included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The subordinated debentures may be included in Tier 1 capital (with certain applicable limitations) under current regulatory guidelines and interpretations.

95

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Subordinated Debt:   

On March 8, 2017, the Company closed the issuanceissued $25.0 million of its $25 million subordinated notes at 100% issue price to accredited institutional investors.  The subordinated notes mature onhad a maturity date of March 15, 2027 and bear an interest rate of 6.25% per annum. The interests are paid semi-annually on March 15 and September 15During the first quarter of each year through March 15, 2022, and quarterly thereafter on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15 of each year.

Interest rate from March 15, 2022 to the maturity date shall reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to the then current three month LIBOR (not less than zero) plus 426 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. The Company may redeem the subordinated notes beginning with the interest payment date of March 15, 2022 and on any scheduled interest payment date thereafter. The subordinated notes may be redeemed in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amountall of the subordinated notesdebt, plus any accrued interest.

LIBOR Transition

The terms of the trust preferred securities may be impacted by the transition from LIBOR to an alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rate, potentially SOFR, in 2023. The overnight and unpaid interest.

1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month USD LIBOR settings will cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. All other LIBOR settings ceased to be published or to be representative as of December 31, 2021. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the transition on the trust preferred securities.

NOTE 710 — INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in(in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Current

 

  

 

  

 

  

Federal

$

27,311

$

16,883

$

10,936

State and local

 

14,162

 

12,252

 

7,226

Total current

 

41,473

 

29,135

 

18,162

Deferred

 

  

 

  

 

  

Federal

 

(1,919)

 

(405)

 

139

State and local

 

(2,081)

 

285

 

151

Total deferred

 

(4,000)

 

(120)

 

290

Total income tax expense

$

37,473

$

29,015

$

18,452

Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)201720162015
Current
Federal$7,920$3,466$2,873
State and local2,499492141
Total current10,4193,9583,014
Deferred
Federal1,045(795)(622)
State and local(255)(118)167
Total deferred790(913)(455)
Total income tax expense$11,209$3,045$2,559

96

(continued)
95

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES (Continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following (dollars in(in thousands):

At December 31,
20172016
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses$4,583$4,990
Nonaccrual interest income28159
Off balance sheet reserves11068
Restricted stock153165
Tangible asset2336
Non-Qualified stock options183251
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale86118
Total gross deferred tax assets5,1665,787
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization574427
Prepaid asset159150
Total gross deferred tax liabilities733577
Net deferred tax asset, included in other assets$4,433$5,210

At December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Deferred tax assets:

 

  

 

  

Allowance for loan losses

$

13,698

$

10,670

Lease liabilities

14,782

Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale

27,084

3,731

Off balance sheet reserves

 

55

 

55

Restricted stock

 

1,140

 

252

Tangible asset

 

7

 

10

Non-qualified stock options

 

285

 

286

Other

 

95

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

57,146

 

15,004

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Right of use lease asset

13,551

Depreciation and amortization

 

4,390

 

3,229

Net unrealized gain on interest rate cap

3,302

 

334

Prepaid assets

548

 

459

Other

 

12

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

 

21,791

 

4,034

Net deferred tax asset, included in other assets

$

35,355

$

10,970

The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to its effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in(in thousands):

For the year ended December 31,
201720162015
Tax expense/​
(benefit)
RateTax expense/​
(benefit)
RateTax expense/​
(benefit)
Rate
Pretax income at statutory rates$8,25235.00%$2,74034.00%$2,32234.00%
State and local taxes, net of federal income
tax benefit
1,4596.192473.102043.00
Nondeductible expenses210.09190.20130.20
Stock options(113)(0.48)490.60160.20
Tax-exempt income, net(10)(0.04)(10)(0.10)��
Impact of U.S. tax reform (the Tax Act)1,5816.71
Other190.0840.10
Effective income tax expense/rate$11,20947.55%$3,04537.80%$2,55937.50%
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corporation

For the year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

2020

Tax expense/

Tax expense/

Tax expense/

    

(benefit)

    

Rate

    

(benefit)

    

Rate

    

(benefit)

    

Rate

    

Pretax income at statutory rates

$

20,349

 

21.00

%  

$

18,810

 

21.00

%  

$

12,163

 

21.00

%  

State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

9,544

 

9.85

 

9,904

 

11.06

 

5,828

 

10.06

Nondeductible expenses

 

8,175

 

8.44

 

680

 

0.76

 

457

 

0.79

Stock options

(302)

(0.31)

Excess tax deduction on equity awards

(467)

(0.52)

(59)

(0.10)

Tax-exempt income, net

 

(106)

 

(0.11)

 

(51)

 

(0.06)

 

 

Other

 

(187)

 

(0.20)

 

139

 

0.15

 

63

 

0.11

Effective income tax expense/rate

$

37,473

 

38.67

%  

$

29,015

 

32.39

%  

$

18,452

 

31.86

%  

The Company and the Bank filefiled consolidated Federal, New York State, Connecticut and New York City tax returns in 2017, 20162022 and 2015.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Act, which includes significant changes2021. The Company is subject to the U.S. corporateCalifornia, Connecticut, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Jersey,  New York State, New York City, and Tennessee income tax system includingtaxes on a federal corporate rate reduction from 35%consolidated basis. The Bank is subject to 21%Alabama, Florida, and limitationsMissouri income taxes on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation. The Tax Act resulted in a one-time U.S. tax expense of  $1.6 million. A majority of the provisions in the Tax Act are effective January 1, 2018.
separate company basis.

As of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021, there are no unrecognized tax benefits, and the Company does not expect this to significantly change in the next twelve months.

(continued)
96

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For Except for California, Connecticut, Kentucky, New York City and Tennessee, the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES (Continued)
The Company and its subsidiary are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of the State and City of New York. The Company is no longer subject to examination by the U.S. federal and state or local tax authorities for years prior to 2014.2019. California is subject to examination for years 2016 and forward. Connecticut, Kentucky and Tennessee are no longer subject to examination for years prior to 2018. As of December 31, 2022, the Company was under audit in New

97

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

York for the 2018 tax year, and in New York City for the 2017 and 2018 tax years. Due to the New York City audit, the 2017 tax year New York City statute of limitation has been extended to June 30, 2023.

NOTE 811 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A member of the Board of Directors of the Company is a stockholder of PASL Holding LLC (“PASL”). PASL conducts no business other than the holding of shares of the Company.
A member of the Board of Directors is the managing director of a law firm which acts (1) in connection with certain regulatory and corporate compliance matters and in the preparation of and negotiation of certain contractual vendor arrangements, and (2) as the Bank’s counsel in certain lending transactions. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Bank incurred legal fees of $101,000, $111,000 and $110,000, respectively, in connection with these services.

Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at year-end 2017, 2016December 31, 2022 and 20152021 were $3.2$4.6 million $710,000 and $538,000$7.3 million, respectively.

A promissory note of $780,000 was made to an executive officer of the BankCompany during 2016. The note hashad a fixed interest rate of 2.125%2.1% per annum (determined by reference to the 5-year LIBOR rate in effect on the note date, plus 100 basis points) and interest is payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. The note had a balloon payment term and the due date was August 15, 2021, with no prepayment penalty. The note was extended for the same outstanding balance of $780,000. Under the revised terms of the note, the note has a fixed interest rate of 1.09% per annum and interest is payable on the last day of each calendar quarter, with no prepayment penalty. The note has a balloon payment term and the due date is August, 15, 2021,2026, with no prepayment penalty. The outstanding balance of the subject loan was $780,000 as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.

2021.

NOTE 9 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases certain branch properties under operating leases. Approximate future minimum rental payments required under all non-cancellable operating leases, before considering renewal options that generally are present, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
2018$2,753
20192,754
20202,737
20212,201
20222,129
Thereafter (and through 2035)6,754
$19,328
Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, was $2.4 million, $2.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
NOTE 1012 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value is

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures. The Company did not have any liabilities that were measured at fair value at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. AFS securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the exchange price that wouldCompany may be received forrequired to record at fair value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as certain impaired loans. These non-recurring fair value adjustments generally involve the write-down of individual assets due to impairment losses.

Accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an asset or paidentity to transfer a liability (exit price) inmaximize the principal or most advantageous market foruse of observable inputs and minimize the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There areuse of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1:Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

(continued)
97

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

Level 2:Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted pricesliabilities, in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3:Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Instruments measured on a recurring basis include the Company’s AFS securities portfolio, equity investments and an interest rate cap derivative contract. The Company usedAFS portfolio is carried at estimated fair value with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in shareholders’ equity. Equity investments are carried at estimated fair value with changes in fair value reported as “unrealized gain/(loss)” on the following methods and significant assumptions to estimatestatements of operations. The interest rate cap derivative contract was carried at its estimated fair value:

Investment Securities:value with changes in fair value reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in shareholders’ equity. The fair values for investment securitiessubstantially all of these assets are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2), using matrix pricing. Matrixobtained monthly from an independent nationally recognized pricing is a mathematical technique commonly used to price debt securities that are not actively traded, values debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to the other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3 inputs). A third party is engaged to obtain the discounted cash flows and the resulting fair value. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.
Impaired Loans:   The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available for similar loans and collateral underlying such loans. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are evaluated onservice. On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses the reasonableness of the fair values obtained for additional impairments and adjusted accordingly.the AFS portfolio by reference to a second independent nationally recognized pricing service. Based on the nature of these securities, the Company’s

98

(continued)
98

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For

independent pricing service provides prices which are categorized as Level 2 since quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the years ended December 31, 2017majority of securities in the Company’s portfolio. Various modeling techniques are used to determine pricing for the Company’s mortgage-backed securities, including option pricing and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
discounted cash flow models. The inputs to these models include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. At least annually, management conducts due diligence on the independent pricing services to review changes to their pricing methodologies and confirm compliance with various regulatory guidelines including information security guidelines, technology infrastructure and business continuity programs.

There are no liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (dollars in(in thousands):

Fair Value Measurement
At December 31, Using
2017Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Residential mortgage-backed securities$$24,684$
Residential collateralized mortgage obligation2,706
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations1,550
Municipal bond1,109
CRA Mutual Fund2,108
Fair Value Measurement
At December 31, Using
2016Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Residential mortgage-backed securities$$29,027$
Residential collateralized mortgage obligation5,103
Municipal bond1,136
CRA Mutual Fund2,063

Fair Value Measurement using:

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Markets

Other

Significant

Carrying

For Identical

Observable

Unobservable

    

Amount

    

Assets (Level 1)

    

Inputs (Level 2)

    

Inputs (Level 3)

At December 31, 2022

U.S. Government agency securities

$

59,372

$

$

59,372

$

U.S. State and Municipal securities

9,212

9,212

Residential mortgage securities

338,548

338,548

Commercial mortgage securities

34,850

34,850

Asset-backed securities

3,765

3,765

CRA Mutual Fund

2,048

2,048

Derivative assets - interest rate cap

Fair Value Measurement using:

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Markets

Other

Significant

Carrying

For Identical

Observable

Unobservable

    

Amount

    

Assets (Level 1)

    

Inputs (Level 2)

    

Inputs (Level 3)

At December 31, 2021

U.S. Government agency securities

$

66,334

$

$

66,334

$

U.S. State and Municipal securities

11,499

11,499

Residential mortgage securities

466,551

466,551

Commercial mortgage securities

17,627

17,627

Asset-backed securities

4,613

4,613

CRA Mutual Fund

2,273

2,273

Derivative assets - interest rate cap

3,385

3,385

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 20172022 or 2016.

(continued)
99

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis:
2021.

There arewere no loans that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are impaired at December 31, 2017. Loans that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and were impaired at December 31, 2016, are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements Using:
Total at
December 31,
2016
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Commercial and industrial loan$3,294$$$3,294
The following tables presents quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements formaterial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Fair ValueValuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRange
(Weighted
Average)
December 31, 2016
Impaired loans – Commercial and industrial loan$3,294Market
approach
Adjustments for
the difference in
comparable sales
10.00%
As of2022 or December 31, 2016, impaired loans with allocated allowance for loan losses, which are2021.

The Company has engaged an independent pricing service provider to provide the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, usingvalue. This provider follows FASB’s exit pricing guidelines, as required by ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement, when calculating the fair valuemarket value.

99


METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments not carried at December 31, 2017 and 2016fair value were as follows (dollars in(in thousands):

Fair Value Measurement Using:

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Markets

Other

Significant

Carrying

For Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Total Fair

At December 31, 2022

    

Amount

    

Assets (Level 1)

    

Inputs (Level 2)

    

Inputs (Level 3)

    

Value

Financial Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$

26,780

$

26,780

$

$

$

26,780

Overnight deposits

230,638

230,638

230,638

Securities held-to-maturity

510,425

437,290

437,290

Loans, net

4,840,523

4,737,007

4,737,007

Other investments

FRB Stock

11,421

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

FHLB Stock

9,191

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Disability Fund

1,000

1,000

1,000

Time deposits at banks

498

498

498

Receivable from prepaid card programs, net

85,605

85,605

85,605

Accrued interest receivable

24,107

964

23,143

24,107

Financial Liabilities:

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

$

2,422,151

$

2,422,151

$

$

$

2,422,151

Money market and savings deposits

2,803,698

2,803,698

2,803,698

Time deposits

52,063

51,058

51,058

Federal funds purchased

150,000

150,000

150,000

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances

100,000

100,000

100,000

Trust preferred securities payable

20,620

19,953

19,953

Prepaid debit cardholder balances

10,579

10,579

10,579

Accrued interest payable

728

112

293

323

728

Secured borrowings

7,725

7,725

7,725

���

Fair Value Measurement Using:

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Markets

Other

Significant

Carrying

For Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Total Fair

At December 31, 2021

    

Amount

    

Assets (Level 1)

    

Inputs (Level 2)

    

Inputs (Level 3)

    

Value

Financial Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$

28,864

$

28,864

$

$

$

28,864

Overnight deposits

2,330,486

2,330,486

2,330,486

Securities held-to-maturity

382,099

380,108

380,108

Loans, net

3,697,200

3,721,619

3,721,619

Other investments

FRB Stock

7,430

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

FHLB Stock

3,070

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Disability Fund

1,000

1,000

1,000

CRA - CD

498

498

498

Receivable from prepaid card programs, net

39,864

39,864

39,864

Accrued interest receivable

15,195

892

14,303

15,195

Financial Liabilities:

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

$

3,668,673

$

3,668,673

$

$

$

3,668,673

Money market and savings deposits

2,687,913

2,687,913

2,687,913

Time deposits

78,986

79,187

79,187

Trust preferred securities payable

20,620

19,997

19,997

Subordinated debt, net of issuance cost

24,712

25,125

25,125

Prepaid debit cardholder balances

8,847

8,847

8,847

Accrued interest payable

746

5

633

108

746

Secured borrowings

32,461

32,507

32,507

At December 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurement Using:
Carrying
Amount
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total Fair
Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks$261,231$261,231$$$261,231
Securities available for sale32,1572,10830,04932,157
Securities held to maturity5,4285,3305,330
Loans, net1,405,0091,410,8601,410,860��
Other investments
Federal Reserve Bank stock3,911N/AN/AN/AN/A
Federal Home Loan Bank stock2,766N/AN/AN/AN/A
SBA Loan Fund5,000N/AN/AN/AN/A
Certificates of deposit2,0002,0002,000
Accrued interest receivable4,421111164,2944,421
Financial liabilities:
Deposits without stated maturities$1,324,110$1,324,110$$1,324,110
Deposits with stated maturities80,24580,07980,079
FHLB Advances42,19842,18842,188
Trust preferred securities payable20,62019,99719,997
Subordinated debt, net of issurance cost24,48925,50025,500
Accrued interest payable74927258464749

100

(continued)
101

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

At December 31, 2016
Fair Value Measurement Using:
Carrying
Amount
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total Fair
Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks$82,931$82,931$$$82,931
Securities available for sale37,3292,06335,266.37,329
Securities held to maturity6,5006,4196,419
Loans, net1,042,7311,059,3331,059,333
Other investments12,588N/AN/AN/AN/A
Accrued interest receivable2,7351572,5782,735
Financial liabilities:
Deposits without stated maturities$903,267$903,267$$$903,267
Deposits with stated maturities90,51390,55990,559
FHLB Advances78,41878,87278,872
Trust preferred securities payable20,62019,99819,998
Accrued interest payable2271962146227
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:
Cash and Due from Banks:   Carrying amounts of cash approximate fair value, since these instruments are either payable on demand or have short-term maturities and as such are classified as Level 1.
Securities Available for Sale and Held to Maturity:   If available, the estimated fair values are based on independent dealer quotations on nationally recognized securities exchanges and are classified as Level 1. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair value is based on matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Other Investments:   It is not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB and FRB stock, and investments in Solomon Hess SBA Loan Fund, due to restrictions placed on transferability.
Loans:   Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for sale are estimated as follows: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values resulting in a Level 3 classification. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality establishing discount factors for these types of loans and resulting in a Level 3 classification. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.
Deposits without stated maturities:   The Fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g. interest and non-interest checking, savings and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the recording date (i.e., their carrying amount) resulting in a Level 1 price.
(continued)
102

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Deposits with stated maturities:   The estimated fair values of certificates of deposit are based on discounted cash flow calculations that use a replacement cost of funds approach to establishing discount rates for certificate of deposit maturities resulting in a Level 2 classification.
FHLB Advances:   Represents FHLB advances for which the estimated fair values are based on discounted cash flow calculations that use a replacement cost of funds approach to establishing discount rates for funding maturities resulting in a Level 2 classification for all other maturity terms.
Trust Preferred Securities Payable:   The estimated fair value is based on estimates using market data for similarly risk weighted items and takes into consideration the features of the debentures, which is an unobservable input resulting in a Level 3 classification.
Subordinated Debt:   The estimated fair value is net of the face value of the notes and amortized issuance cost, which is an observable input resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable:   For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of the fair value resulting in a Level 1, 2 or 3 classification consistent with the underlying asset or liability the interest is associated with.
Off-Balance-Sheet Liabilities:   The fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments to extend credit is estimated using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The fair value is immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Fair value estimates are made at specific points in time and are based on existing on-and off-balance sheet financial instruments. These estimates are subjective in nature and dependent on a number of significant assumptions associated with each financial instrument or group of financial instruments, including estimates of discount rates, risks associated with specific financial instruments, estimates of future cash flows, and relevant available market information. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. In addition, fair value estimates do not reflect the value of anticipated future business, premiums or discounts that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, or the tax consequences of realizing gains or losses on the sale of financial instruments.
NOTE 1113 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Class A preferred stock was nonvoting and contained a dividend rate

During the third quarter of 8.00% per annum. Dividends were non-cumulative and payable out of surplus or net profits of the Company when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, provided that no dividends were paid on common stock until the Class A preferred stock have received all current dividends and any supplementary dividends. Supplementary dividends could be declared at the Board of Directors’ discretion to make up for unpaid ordinary dividends from prior fiscal years.

During 2015, a shareholder converted a total of 24,204 shares of Class A preferred stock to 13,477 shares of common stock. The Company did not issue any preferred stock in 2015. During 2015,2021, the Company issued 722,2222.3 million shares of its common stock viaat a rights offering. Totalprice of $75 per share, resulting in net proceeds net of direct offering cost of  $394,000 were $12,606,000.
In February 2016, a shareholder converted a total of 60,000$162.7 million.

The Company had outstanding 272,636 shares of Class A preferred stock to 60,000 shares of common stock without any monetary exchange.

In April 2016, one of the Company’s Preferred Class A shareholders forfeited 123,924 shares and all rights to these Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Class A shares to the United States Marshals Service. The Company purchased these shares and all rights to these shares from the United States Marshals Office for $1.4 million, equating to a price per share of  $11.30. These shares were purchased by the Company as Treasury Preferred Stock and retired in August 2016.
(continued)
103

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 11 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)
In August 2016, all of the remaining outstanding 267,120 Class A preferred stock were redeemed at the issued price of  $10.00 per share, totaling $2.7 million. The Company also paid dividends totaling $3.4 million on the shares, which represented the dividend rate of 8% for the period from issuance through redemption.
Theits Series F, Class B non-voting preferred stock, is nonvoting and with a par value, of $0.01 per share. The stock iswas subordinate and junior to all indebtedness of the Company and to all other series of preferred stock of the Company. The holdersholder of the Series F, Class B preferred stock arewas entitled to receive ratable dividends as provided herein only if and when dividends arewere concurrently declared and payable on the shares of common shares.
During August 2016, the Company issued 272,636fourth quarter of 2021, the holder of the Series F, Class B Preferred Stock exchanged shares of Series F, Class B preferred stock for a net amount of  $5.5 million, and 1,365,969 shares of common stock via a rights offering for a net amount of $28.2 million. An additional 8,143 common shares were sold to directors for $170,000. The direct offering cost associated with the preferred stock and common stock offering were $710,000. The Company did not issue any preferred stock in 2015.
During 2016, restricted common stock vesting totaled 82,806 shares and. During 2017, restricted common stock vesting totaled 16,969.
The Company completed IPO of its common stock on November 10, 2017 and sold 3,100,000 shares of common stock at $35.00 per share, as well as, 465,000 additional shares of common stock at $35.00 per share pursuant to the underwriter’s overallotment option. The aggregate net proceeds to the Company from its IPO, including the overallotment shares, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses were approximately $115 million.
NOTE 12 — STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
The Company has two share-based compensation plans which are described below.
Stock Option Plan
The Company established the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999 Plan”), as amended, under which certain employees and directors may receive stock options. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no unissued shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for option grants under the Plan.
stock.

NOTE 14 — STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

Equity Incentive Plan

In May 2009

At December 31, 2022, the Company approvedmaintained three stock compensation plans, the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2022 EIP”), the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 EIP”) and the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”EIP”) as a successor. The 2019 EIP expired on May 31, 2022 but has outstanding restricted stock awards and PRSUs subject to the 1999 Plan.vesting schedules. The 2009 Plan permitsEIP has also expired but has outstanding stock options that may still be exercised.

The 2022 EIP was approved on May 31, 2022 by stockholders of the grantingCompany. Under the 2022 EIP, the maximum number of shares of stock that may be delivered to participants in the form of restricted shares, incentivestock, restricted stock units and stock options, (“ISO”), nonqualifiedincluding ISOs and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted share units and other stock-basedis 358,000, subject to adjustment as set forth in the 2022 EIP, plus any awards to employees, directors, officers, consultants, advisors, suppliers and any other persons or entity whose servicesthat are considered valuable for up to 423,000 shares. The authorized shares will be new issues upon exercise of any options granted. forfeited under the 2019 EIP after March 15, 2022.

Stock Options

Under the terms of the 2009 Plan, each2022 EIP, a stock option agreement cannot have an exercise price that is less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares covered by the stock option on the date of grant. In the case of an ISO granted to anya 10% shareholder,stockholder, the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares covered by the stock option on the date of grant. In no event shall the exercise price of an option be less than the par value of the shares for which the option is exercisable. In no event shall the exercise period exceed ten years from the date of grant of the option, except, in the case of an ISO granted to a 10% shareholder,stockholder, the exercise period shall not exceed five years from the date of grant. In the eventThe 2022 EIP contains a double trigger change in control feature, providing for an acceleration of vesting upon an involuntary termination of employment simultaneous with or following a change in control, the Committee may determine that any award then outstanding shall be assumed or an equivalent award shall be substituted by the successor corporation.

(continued)
104

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 12 — STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)
control.

The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below.model. Expected volatilities based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock are not significant. The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Historically, the Company has not paid a dividend on its common shares and does not expect to do so in the near future. No options were granted in 2017 and 2016. The fair value

101

2015
Risk-free interest rate12.19%​
Expected term10 years​
Dividend yield0%​

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option planoptions and the changechanges during the year is presented below:

20172016
Number of
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Number of
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year276,500$19.97289,000$20.41
Granted
Exercised(4,503)30.00
Cancelled/forfeited(497)30.00(12,500)30.00
Outstanding, end of year271,500$19.79276,500$19.97
Options vested and exercisable at year-end271,500$19.79276,500$19.97
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year$$
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)5.576.25
(continued)
105

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For

Year ended

December 31, 2022

Weighted

    

Number of

    

Average

    

Options

Exercise Price

Outstanding, beginning of period

231,000

$

18.00

Granted

Exercised

(10,800)

18.00

Cancelled/forfeited

Outstanding, end of period

220,200

$

18.00

Options vested and exercisable at end of period

220,200

$

18.00

Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)

1.41

Weighted average intrinsic value

$

40.67

The intrinsic value of exercises was $417,000 and $0.0 for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 12 — STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about2021, respectively. There was no unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017:
Options Outstanding
Range of Average Exercise PricesNumber
Outstanding at
December 31,
2017
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
$10 – 20231,0006.3818.00
$21 – 3040,5000.9530.00
$10 – 30271,5005.5719.79
2022 or 2021.

There was no compensation cost related to stock options during the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 or 2020.

Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units

The Company issued restricted stock awards and restricted stock units under the 2019 EIP and the 2009 EIP (collectively, “restricted stock grants”) to certain key personnel under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.personnel. Each restricted stock awardgrant vests based on the vesting scheduledschedule outlined in the awardrestricted stock grant agreement. Restricted stock awardsgrants are subject to forfeiture if the holder is not employed by the Company on the vesting date.

In 2013, shareholders approved an additional 300,000the first quarter of 2022, 2021 and 2020, 72,025, 78,582 and 60,307 restricted stock grants were issued to certain key personnel, respectively. One-third of these shares available under the plan. In 2016, additional shares of 760,000 were authorized.vest each year for three years beginning on March 1, 2023, March 1, 2022, and December 15, 2020, respectively. Total shares issuable under the plan are 823,629compensation cost that has been charged against income for restricted stock grants was $4.5 million, $2.4 million, and 851,571 at$1.5 million for years ended December 31, 20172022, 2021, and 2016,2020, respectively. There were 31,606 and 77,667 shares granted in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The fair value of the shares granted was calculated using the share price as of grant date. As of December 31, 2017,2022, there was $1.06$6.1 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.02.65 years.

In January 2022, 11,126 restricted shares were granted to members of the Board of Directors, which vested in January 2023. In January 2019, 38,900 restricted shares were granted to members of the Board of Directors in lieu of retainer fees for three years of service. In the fourth quarter of 2020, 1,785 shares were granted to a new member of the Board of Directors, all of which vested in the fourth quarter of 2021. Total expense for these awards was $300,000, $410,000 and $400,000 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, there was no unrecognized expense related to these grants.

102

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s restricted stock awards:

Year ended

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

December 31, 2020

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Average

Number of

Grant Date

Number of

Grant Date

Number of

Grant Date

    

 Shares

    

Fair Value

 Shares

    

Fair Value

 Shares

    

Fair Value

Outstanding, beginning of period

90,999

$

47.35

76,289

$

37.01

104,838

$

29.86

Granted

83,151

102.49

78,582

50.80

62,092

44.80

Forfeited

(578)

92.44

(10,200)

48.09

(31,781)

38.24

Vested

(44,010)

37.12

(53,672)

37.57

(58,860)

31.83

Outstanding at end of period

129,562

$

86.01

90,999

$

47.35

76,289

$

37.01

The total fair value of shares vested is $3.6 million, $2.0 million, and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Performance-Based Stock Units

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company established a long-term incentive award program under the 2019 EIP. Under the program, 90,000 PRSUs were awarded. During the second quarter of 2022, 20,800 PRSUs were forfeited and reissued pursuant to the 2022 EIP. The weighted average service inception date fair value of the outstanding awarded shares was $6.0 million. At the beginning of 2023 and 2022, 29,200 and 30,000 PRSUs, respectively, were vested as all performance criteria were met. The remaining 30,800 PRSUs are scheduled to vest in February 2024, provided certain performance criteria are met in fiscal year 2023. All vested shares will not be delivered until the first quarter of 2024.  Total compensation cost that has been charged against income for this planthe PRSUs was $412,000, $1.7$1.9 million, for years ended December 31, 2022 and $281,000 for 2017, 20162021, respectively.

During the first quarter of 2018, the Company established a long-term incentive award program under the 2009 Plan. Under the program, 90,000 PRSUs were awarded. For each award, the PRSUs were eligible to be earned over a three-year performance period based on personal performance and 2015, respectively. Outthe Company’s relative performance, in each case, as compared to certain measurement goals that were established at the onset of the totalperformance period. These 90,000 PRSUs were earned at the end of the three-year period and vested in the first quarter of 2021. Total compensation cost related to restricted stocks in 2016,that has been charged against income for the 2009 Plan was $1.4 million was associated with the grant and immediate vesting of 66,667 restricted shares. These shares were issued as a part of restructuring an executive management employment agreement, during the third quarter of 2016.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended December 31, 2017:
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Outstanding, beginning of year64,638$20.42
Granted31,606$21.00
Forfeited(3,167)$18.00
Vested(16,973)$18.00
Outstanding at December 31, 201776,104$20.61
The total fair value of shares vested is $725,000, $1.7 million and $68,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
2020.

NOTE 1315 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company has a 401(k) plan for eligible employees. The contribution for any participant may not exceed the maximum amount allowable by law. Each year, the Company may elect to match a percentage of participant contributions. The Company may also elect each year to make additional discretionary contributions to the plan. The total contributions were $334,000, $268,000$889,000 and $221,000$774,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(continued)
106

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016 (Continued)
2021, respectively.

NOTE 1416 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk

The BankCompany is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the financial

103

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

statements. The Bank’sCompany’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformancenon-performance by the other partycounterparty to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The BankCompany uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

The Bank had outstanding the following off-balance-sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk, as of December 31 (dollars inare outstanding (in thousands):

At December 31,
20172016
Fixed RateVariable RateFixed RateVariable Rate
Undrawn lines of credit$39,651$76,008$60,984$9,890
Letters of credit23,7419,808
$63,392$76,008$70,792$9,890

At December 31, 2022

At December 31, 2021

Fixed

Variable

Fixed

Variable

    

Rate

    

Rate

    

Rate

    

Rate

Unused commitments

$

40,685

$

364,908

$

39,676

$

346,115

Standby and commercial letters of credit

53,947

49,988

$

94,632

$

364,908

$

89,664

$

346,115

A commitment to extend credit is a legally binding agreement to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally expire within 2two years. AtAs of December 31, 2017,2022 and 2021, the Bank’sCompany’s fixed rate loan commitments are to make loans with interest rates ranging from 3.5%3.0% to 9.5% and maturities of one year or more.8.5%. At December 31, 20162022 and 2021, the Bank’s fixedCompany’s variable rate loan commitments were to make loans withhad interest rates ranging from 3.75%6.0% to 8.75% and maturities11.5%, respectively, with a maturity of one year or more. The amount of collateral obtained, if any, by the BankCompany upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies but may include mortgages on commercial and residential real estate, security interests in business assets, equipment, deposit accounts with the BankCompany or other financial institutions and securities.

The Bank hasCompany’s stand-by letters of credit in the amount of  $23.7amounted to $53.9 million and $9.8 million included above as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for which the Bank has pledged interest-bearing accounts of  $1.7 million and $4.0$50.0 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The Company’s stand-by letters of credit are collateralized by interest-bearing accounts of $28.7 million and $29.6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Regulatory Proceedings

There are ongoing investigations by federal and state governmental entities concerning a prepaid debit card product program that was offered by the Company through an independent program manager. These include investigations as to which the Company is a subject by the FRB and certain state authorities, including the NYSDFS. During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, third parties used this prepaid debit card product to establish unauthorized accounts and to receive unauthorized government benefits payments, including unemployment insurance benefits payments made pursuant to the CARES Act from many states. The Company ceased accepting new accounts from this program manager in July of 2020 and has exited its relationship with this program manager. The Company is cooperating in these investigations and continues to review this matter. The foregoing could result in enforcement or other actions against the Company and the Bank including civil money penalties and remedial measures.

The Company is in discussions with the FRB and the NYSDFS with respect to consensual resolutions of their investigations. Although the Company is unable at this time deposits mature within one year.to determine the final terms on which the FRB and NYSDFS investigations will be resolved or the timing of such resolutions, the Company accrued a charge of $35.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2022 to establish a reserve for what the Company believes is a reasonable estimate of the probable loss and expenses associated with the FRB and NYSDFS settlements. If final settlements with the FRB and the NYSDFS are not reached and the FRB and the NYSDFS bring public enforcement actions, such actions and their resolution, as well as any other matter arising out of the foregoing program, could have a materially adverse effect on the Company and the Bank’s assets, business, cash flows, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and/or results of operations.

104

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1517 — REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Holding Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company and the Bank met all applicable regulatory capital requirements to be considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. The Company and Bank manage their capital to comply with their internal planning targets and regulatory capital standards administered by federal banking agencies. The foregoingCompany and Bank review capital ratioslevels on a monthly basis.

The Company and the Bank are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about capital components, risk weightings and other factors. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (Basel III rules) became effective for the Bank on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being fully phased in by January 1, 2019.. The minimum required capital conservation buffer was 1.25%2.50% at December 31, 20172022 and 0.625% at December 31, 2016. The2021. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in beginning January 1, 2016 at 0.625%for the Company was 5.4% and 8.1%, respectively. As of risk-weighted assetsDecember 31, 2022 and increasing by 0.625% each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.2021, the capital conservation buffer for the Bank was 5.1% and 7.3%, respectively. The net unrealized gain or loss on available for saleAFS securities is not included in the computation of the regulatory capital. The Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements, to which they are subject, as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.

2021.

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these

(continued)
107

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 15 — REGULATORY CAPITAL (Continued)
terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank and the Company as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.

The Company’s principal source

105

The following is a summary of actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, for the Company and the Bank compared to the requirements for minimum capital adequacy and classification as well capitalized. Actual and required capital amounts and ratios are presented below at year end (dollars in thousands):

For

To be Well

 

Minimum

Capital

Capitalized under

Capital

Adequacy

Prompt Corrective

 

Conservation

Actual

Purposes

Action Regulations

 

Buffer

Amount

Ratio

    

Amount

Ratio

    

Amount

Ratio

    

Ratio

At December 31, 2022

  

  

    

  

  

    

  

  

The Company

Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)

$

641,082

10.2

%  

$

250,963

4.0

%  

$

N/A

N/A

%  

Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)

$

620,462

12.1

%  

$

230,879

4.5

%  

$

N/A

N/A

2.5

%  

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

641,082

12.5

%  

$

307,838

6.0

%  

$

N/A

N/A

2.5

%  

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

686,139

13.4

%  

$

410,451

8.0

%  

$

N/A

N/A

2.5

%  

The Bank

Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)

$

628,825

10.0

%  

$

250,920

4.0

%  

$

313,650

5.0

%  

%  

Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)

$

628,825

12.3

%  

$

230,815

4.5

%  

$

333,399

6.5

%  

2.5

%  

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

628,825

12.3

%  

$

307,753

6.0

%  

$

410,337

8.0

%  

2.5

%  

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

673,876

13.1

%  

$

410,337

8.0

%  

$

512,922

10.0

%  

2.5

%  

At December 31, 2021

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

The Company

Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)

$

575,380

8.5

%  

$

270,863

4.0

%  

$

N/A

N/A

%  

Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)

$

554,760

14.1

%  

$

177,646

4.5

%  

$

N/A

N/A

2.5

%  

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

575,380

14.6

%  

$

236,861

6.0

%  

$

N/A

N/A

2.5

%  

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

635,002

16.1

%  

$

315,815

8.0

%  

$

N/A

N/A

2.5

%  

The Bank

Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)

$

566,835

8.4

%  

$

270,800

4.0

%  

$

338,499

5.0

%  

%  

Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)

$

566,835

14.4

%  

$

177,582

4.5

%  

$

256,508

6.5

%  

2.5

%  

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

566,835

14.4

%  

$

236,777

6.0

%  

$

315,702

8.0

%  

2.5

%  

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

$

601,740

15.2

%  

$

315,702

8.0

%  

$

394,628

10.0

%  

2.5

%  

As a result of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018, banking regulatory agencies adopted a revised definition of “well capitalized” for financial institutions and holding companies with assets of less than $10.0 billion and that are not determined to be ineligible by their primary federal regulator due to their risk profile (a “Qualifying Community Bank”). The definition expanded the ways that a Qualifying Community Bank may meet its capital requirements and be deemed “well capitalized.” The rule established a community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) equal to the tangible equity capital divided by the average total consolidated assets. Regulators established the CBLR at 8.5% through calendar year 2021 and 9% thereafter. The CARES Act temporarily reduced the CBLR to 8%.

A Qualifying Community Bank that maintains a leverage ratio greater than 9% is considered to be well capitalized and to have met generally applicable leverage capital requirements, generally applicable risk-based capital requirements, and any other capital or leverage requirements to which such financial institution or holding company is subject. The Company and Bank intend to continue to measure capital adequacy using the ratios in the table above.

ActualFor Capital Adequacy
Purposes
To be Well Capitalized
under Prompt Corrective
Action Regulations
AmountRatioAmountRatioAmountRatio
At December 31, 2017
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$287,03919.9%$115,6368.0%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$280,31719.4%$115,5238.0%$144,40310.0%
Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$221,80315.3%$65,0454.5%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$265,07618.4%$64,9814.5%$93,8626.5%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$247,30517.1%$86,7266.0%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$265,07618.4%$86,6426.0%$115,5238.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$247,30513.7%$72,2064.0%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$265,07614.7%$72,0994.0%$90,1245.0%
At December 31, 2016
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$131,89512.5%$84,7338.0%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$130,94912.4%$84,6198.0%$105,77410.0%
Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$114,42110.8%$47,6624.5%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$118,97711.3%$47,5984.5%$68,7536.5%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$119,92311.3%$63,5496.0%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$118,97711.3%$63,4656.0%$84,6198.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$119,92310.5%$45,7424.0%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$118,97710.4%$45,7034.0%$57,1285.0%

106

(continued)
108

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 15 — REGULATORY CAPITAL (Continued)

The following is a summary of actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 for the Company and the Bank compared to the requirements for minimum capital adequacy plus the 1.25% capital conservation buffer currently in place:
ActualMinimum for Capital Adequacy
plus Capital Conservation Buffer
AmountRatioAmountRatio
December 31, 2017:
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$287,03919.9%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$280,31719.4%$133,5739.3%
Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$221,80315.3%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$265,07618.4%$83,0325.8%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$247,30517.1%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$265,07618.4%$104,6927.3%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$247,30513.7%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$265,07614.7%$72,0994.0%
ActualMinimum for Capital Adequacy
plus Capital Conservation Buffer
AmountRatioAmountRatio
December 31, 2016:
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$131,89512.5%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$130,94912.4%$91,2308.6%
Tier 1 common equity (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$114,42110.8%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$118,97711.3%$54,2095.1%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$119,92311.3%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$118,97711.3%$70,0756.6%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.$119,92310.5%N/AN/A
Metropolitan Commercial Bank$118,97710.4%$45,7034.0%
(continued)
109

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1618 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The Company uses the two-class method is used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earningearnings available to common shareholdersstockholders for the period are allocated between common shareholdersstockholders and participating securities according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The factors used in the earnings per share calculation are as follows (in thousands, except per share data).

Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Basic
Net income per consolidated statements of income$12,369$5,013$4,269
Less: Dividends paid to preferred shareholders(3,420)
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities(183)(30)(85)
Net income available to common stockholder$12,186$1,563$4,184
Weighted average common shares outstanding including participating securities5,147,1493,708,7342,775,152
Less: Weighted average participating securities(76,104)(68,708)(55,347)
Weighted average common shares outstanding5,071,0453,640,0262,719,805
Basic earnings per common share$2.40$0.43$1.54
Diluted
Net income allocated to common shareholders$12,186$1,563$4,184
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share5,071,0453,640,0262,719,805
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercise of stock options131,18933,000
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares5,202,2343,673,0262,719,805
Dilutive earnings per commons share$2.34$0.43$1.54
There were no

Year Ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Basic

Net income per consolidated statements of income

$

59,425

$

60,555

$

39,466

Less:  Earnings allocated to participating securities

(141)

(739)

(344)

Net income available to common stockholders

$

59,284

$

59,816

$

39,122

Weighted average common shares outstanding including participating securities

10,955,077

9,123,037

8,293,677

Less:  Weighted average participating securities

(26,056)

(111,337)

(72,248)

Weighted average common shares outstanding

10,929,021

9,011,700

8,221,429

Basic earnings per common share

5.42

6.64

4.76

Diluted

Net income allocated to common stockholders

$

59,284

$

59,816

$

39,122

Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share

10,929,021

9,011,700

8,221,429

Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercise of stock options

170,648

170,792

103,463

Add: Dilutive effects of assumed vesting of performance based restricted stock

56,711

51,581

73,552

Add: Dilutive effects of assumed vesting of restricted stock units

43,804

38,749

Average shares and dilutive potential common shares

11,200,184

9,272,822

8,398,444

Dilutive earnings per common share

$

5.29

$

6.45

$

4.66

All stock options thatand performance based restricted stock units were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for 2017;the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 45,500 and 289,000 shares2020.

107


METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)

NOTE 17 — PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Condensed financial information for the Corporation (parent company only) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Condensed Balance Sheets
At December 31,
20172016
Assets
Cash and due from banks$6,761$818
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses776776
Investments620620
Investment in subsidiary bank, at equity274,190128,671
Other assets59611
Total assets$282,943$130,896
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Trust preferred securities payable20,62020,620
Subordinated debt payable, net of issuance costs24,489
Other liabilities950785
Total liabilities46,05921,405
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock33
Common stock8145
Surplus211,14596,116
Retained earnings25,86113,492
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(206)(165)
Total equity236,884109,491
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$282,943$130,896
(continued)
111

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 17 — PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Condensed Statements of Income
Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Income:
Loan$17$6$
Securities and money market funds1925
Total interest income172525
Interest expense:
Trust preferred securities payable636539455
Subordinated debt interest expense1,322
Total interest expense1,958539455
Net interest expense(1,941)(514)(430)
Provision for loan losses4
Net interest income after provision for loan losses(1,941)(518)(430)
Other expense33
Loss before undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank(1,974)(518)(430)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank13,5605,3194,526
Income before income tax expense11,5864,8014,096
Income tax benefit(783)(212)(173)
Net income$12,369$5,013$4,269
(continued)
112

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 17 — PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income$12,369$5,013$4,269
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank(13,560)(5,319)(4,526)
Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs46
Provision for loan losses4
Stock based compensation expense412
Decrease (increase) in other assets(585)25(29)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities16541526
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(1,153)138(260)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Investments in subsidiary bank(132,000)(26,000)(11,400)
Loan to related party(780)
Net cash used in Investing activities(132,000)���(26,780)(11,400)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net114,77328,36812,606
Repurchase of common stock for exercise of stock options and tax withholdings for restricted stock vestings(255)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net5,503
Purchase and retirement of preferred stock(1,400)
Redemption of preferred stock, net(2,672)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options135
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt, net of issuance cost24,443
Payment of preferred stock dividend(3,420)
Net cash provided by financing activities139,09626,37912,606
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents5,943(263)946
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year8181,081135
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$6,761$818$1,081
(continued)
113

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 1819 — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following table summarizes the changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) balances, net of tax effects at the dates indicated (dollars in(in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
Beginning balance$(165)$16$129
Net change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification, net of tax(41)(158)(113)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax(23)
Net current period other comprehensive loss(41)(181)(113)
Ending balance$(206)$(165)$16

Year Ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Beginning balance

$

(7,504)

$

973

$

1,207

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

Unrealized gain (loss) on AFS securities:

Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period

(76,934)

(14,722)

4,877

Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net income

(609)

(3,286)

Tax effect

23,353

4,795

(514)

Net of tax

(53,581)

(10,536)

1,077

Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:

Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period

11,704

2,957

(1,925)

Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income

(1,949)

Tax effect

(2,968)

(898)

614

Net of tax

6,787

2,059

(1,311)

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)

(46,794)

(8,477)

(234)

Ending balance

$

(54,298)

$

(7,504)

$

973

The proceeds from sales and calls of securities during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $0.0, $43.2 million and $141.4 million, respectively. The following representstable shows the reclassificationsamounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (dollarsfor the gain on the sale of securities (in thousands):

Affected line item in

the Consolidated Statements

Year Ended December 31, 

of Operations

2022

2021

2020

Realized gain on sale of AFS securities

$

$

609

$

3,286

Gain on Sale of Securities

Income tax (expense) benefit

(197)

(1,036)

Income tax expense

Total reclassifications, net of income tax

$

$

412

$

2,250

Realized gain on cash flow hedges

$

1,949

$

$

Licensing fees

Income tax (expense) benefit

(599)

Income tax expense

Total reclassifications, net of income tax

$

1,350

$

$

108

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 20 – REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

All of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers that are in the scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers are recognized in non-interest income. The following table presents the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers (in thousands):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Service charges on deposit accounts

$

5,747

$

4,755

$

3,728

Global Payments Group revenue

 

19,341

 

16,445

 

8,464

Other service charges and fees

 

1,763

 

1,950

 

1,477

Total

$

26,851

$

23,150

$

13,669

A description of the Company’s revenue streams accounted for under the accounting guidance follows:

Service charges on deposit accounts

The Company offers business and personal retail products and services, which include, but are not limited to, online banking, mobile banking, ACH, and remote deposit capture. A standard deposit contract exists between the Company and all deposit customers. The Company earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based services (such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees), account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the customer’s request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.

Global payment group revenue

The Company offers corporate cash management and retail banking services and, through its global payments business, provides BaaS to its fintech partners. The Company earns initial set-up fees for these programs as well as fees for transactions processed. The Company receives transaction data at the end of each month for services rendered, at which time revenue is recognized. Additionally, Service charges specific to Global payment customers’ deposits are recognized within Global payment group revenue.

Other service charges

The primary component of other service charges relates to letter of credit fees and FX conversion fees. The Company outsources FX conversion for foreign currency transactions to correspondent banks. The Company earns a portion of an FX conversion fee that the customer charges to process an FX conversion transaction. Revenue is recognized at the end of the month once the customer has remitted the transaction information to the Company.

Year Ended December 31,Affected line item in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations
201720162015
Realized gain on sale of available for sale securities$$40$Net gains on securities transactions
Income tax expense$(17)Income tax expense
Total reclassifications, net of income tax$$23$

109

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1921 – DERIVATIVES

In 2020, the Company entered into an interest rate cap derivative contract (“interest rate cap” or “contract”) as a part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The interest rate cap had a notional amount of $300.0 million and a contractual maturity of March 1, 2025. The notional amount of the interest rate cap does not represent the amount exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged was determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the contract. The interest rate subject to the cap was 30-day LIBOR.

The interest rate cap was designated as a cash flow hedge of certain deposit liabilities of the Company. The hedge was determined to be highly effective during 2022 until it was terminated in the third quarter of 2022. The unrecognized value of $12.7 million at termination will be released from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and recorded as a credit to Licensing fees expense through March 2025.

The following tables reflect the derivatives recorded on the balance sheet (in thousands):

Notional

Fair

Amount

Value

At December 31, 2022

Derivatives designated as hedges:

Interest rate caps related to customer deposits

$

$

Total included in Other Assets

$

$

At December 31, 2021

Derivatives designated as hedges:

Interest rate caps related to customer deposits

$

300,000

$

3,385

Total included in Other Assets

$

300,000

$

3,385

The effect of cash flow hedge accounting on accumulated other comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Interest rate caps related to customer deposits

Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI, net of tax

$

8,131

$

2,059

$

(1,311)

Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI into income

$

1,949

$

$

Location of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI into income

 

Licensing fees

 

N/A

 

N/A

NOTE 22 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None.

110

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 23 — PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Condensed financial information for the Company (parent company only) is as follows (in thousands):

Condensed Statements of Financial Condition

    

At December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Assets

 

  

 

  

Cash and due from banks

$

9,476

$

32,328

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses

 

776

 

776

Investments

 

620

 

620

Investment in subsidiary bank, at equity

 

584,522

 

569,327

Other assets

 

1,520

 

6

Total assets

596,914

603,057

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

  

 

  

Trust preferred securities

 

20,620

 

20,620

Subordinated debt payable, net of issuance costs

 

 

24,712

Other liabilities

 

397

 

736

Total liabilities

 

21,017

 

46,068

Stockholders’ Equity

 

  

 

  

Preferred stock

 

 

Common stock

 

109

 

109

Surplus

 

389,276

 

382,999

Retained earnings

 

240,810

 

181,385

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

(54,298)

 

(7,504)

Total equity

 

575,897

 

556,989

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

596,914

$

603,057

111

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed Statements of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Income

    

  

    

  

    

  

Loans

$

9

$

14

$

17

Securities and money market funds

25

13

18

Total interest income

 

34

 

27

 

35

Interest expense

 

  

 

  

 

  

Trust preferred securities

 

823

 

438

 

590

Subordinated debt

 

605

 

1,618

 

1,618

Total interest expense

 

1,428

 

2,056

 

2,208

Net interest expense

 

(1,394)

 

(2,029)

 

(2,173)

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 

Net interest expense after provision for loan losses

 

(1,394)

 

(2,029)

 

(2,173)

Other expense

 

2,767

 

1,288

 

2,338

Loss before undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank

 

(4,161)

 

(3,317)

 

(4,511)

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank

 

62,357

 

62,798

 

42,844

Income before income tax benefit

 

58,196

 

59,481

 

38,333

Income tax benefit

 

1,229

 

1,074

 

1,133

Net income

$

59,425

$

60,555

$

39,466

Comprehensive income

$

12,631

$

52,078

$

39,232

112

Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 

    

2022

2021

2020

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

  

  

  

Net income

$

59,425

$

60,555

$

39,466

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Undistributed earnings of subsidiary bank

 

(62,357)

 

(58,798)

 

(42,844)

Cash dividend from subsidiary bank

4,000

Other operating adjustments

6,351

(746)

2,438

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

3,419

 

5,011

 

(940)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

 

  

 

  

 

  

Investments in subsidiary bank

(132,000)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

(132,000)

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

 

  

 

  

 

  

Redemption of common stock for tax withholdings for restricted stock vesting

(1,559)

(3,385)

(881)

Redemption of subordinated notes

(24,712)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

162,687

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(26,271)

 

159,302

 

(881)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(22,852)

 

32,313

 

(1,821)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

32,328

 

15

 

1,836

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

$

9,476

$

32,328

$

15

113

UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Consolidated Quarterly Financial Data (dollars, except per share amounts, in thousands)

2017 Quarter Ended
December 31September 30June 30March 31
Interest income$17,864$16,401$14,047$12,441
Interest expense2,2932,4372,2811,660
Net interest income15,57113,96411,76610,781
Provision for loan losses3,4991,2001,790570
Net interest income after provision for loan losses12,07212,7649,97610,211
Non-interest income6,2492,2331,5731,245
Non-interest expense9,7808,5907,1417,234
Income before income taxes8,5416,4074,4084,222
Income tax expense5,2162,5621,7571,674
Net income$3,325$3,845$2,651$2,548
Basic earnings per share$0.50$0.83$0.57$0.55
Diluted earnings per share$0.49$0.82$0.57$0.55

2022 Quarter Ended

    

December 31

    

September 30

    

June 30

    

March 31

Interest income

$

80,554

$

70,057

$

59,158

$

50,970

Interest expense

 

16,655

 

6,732

 

3,856

 

4,338

Net interest income

 

63,899

 

63,325

 

55,302

 

46,632

Provision for loan losses

 

2,309

 

2,007

 

2,400

 

3,400

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

61,590

 

61,318

 

52,902

 

43,232

Non-interest income

 

6,350

 

5,818

 

6,998

 

7,427

Non-interest expense

 

66,659

 

31,190

 

26,269

 

24,619

Income before income taxes

 

1,281

 

35,946

 

33,631

 

26,040

Income tax expense

 

9,021

 

10,991

 

10,442

 

7,019

Net income (loss)

$

(7,740)

$

24,955

$

23,189

$

19,021

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

$

(0.71)

$

2.28

$

2.12

$

1.74

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

$

(0.71)

$

2.23

$

2.07

$

1.69

    

2021 Quarter Ended

    

December 31

    

September 30

    

June 30

    

March 31

Interest income

$

49,110

$

45,018

$

41,050

$

38,106

Interest expense

 

4,300

 

4,226

 

4,077

 

3,680

Net interest income

 

44,810

 

40,792

 

36,973

 

34,426

Provision for loan losses

 

501

 

490

 

1,875

 

950

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

44,309

 

40,302

 

35,098

 

33,476

Non-interest income

 

7,057

 

5,891

 

6,156

 

4,593

Non-interest expense

 

23,314

 

21,984

 

21,689

 

20,325

Income before income taxes

 

28,052

 

24,209

 

19,565

 

17,744

Income tax expense

 

9,165

 

7,994

 

6,229

 

5,627

Net income (loss)

$

18,887

$

16,215

$

13,336

$

12,117

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

$

1.74

$

1.82

$

1.59

$

1.46

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

$

1.69

$

1.77

$

1.55

$

1.43

(continued)

114

114

METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (Continued)
NOTE 19 — UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Continued)
2016 Quarter Ended
December 31September 30June 30March 31
Interest income$11,919$11,337$10,970$9,929
Interest expense1,4921,5191,5981,480
Net interest income10,4279,8189,3728,449
Provision for loan losses5,9003501,250560
Net interest income after provision for loan losses4,5279,4688,1227,889
Non-interest income1,2881,3211,6581,156
Non-interest expense6,1998,2676,6626,243
Income before income taxes(384)2,5223,1182,802
Income tax expense(433)1,0721,2681,138
Net income$49$1,450$1,850$1,664
Basic earnings per share$0.01$(0.50)$0.59$0.53
Diluted earnings per share(1)
$0.01$(0.50)$0.58$0.53
(1)
The EPS for September 30, 2016 was negative despite having a positive Net Income due to dividends paid out to preferred shareholders in that quarter.
(continued)
115

EXHIBIT INDEX
 3.1Certificate of Incorporation of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp, as amended.(1)
 3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.(2)
 4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.(3)
 4.2Form of Class B Preferred Stock Certificate of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.(4)
10.1Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 21, 2016, between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Endicott Opportunity Partners IV, L.P.(5)
10.2Employment Agreement by and among Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Mark R. DeFazio(6)
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8Form of Restricted Share Agreement
10.9Form of Stock Option Agreement
10.10First Amendment to 2009 Equity Incentive Plan
10.11Second Amendment to 2009 Equity Incentive Plan
10.12Change in Control Agreement by and among Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., Metropolitan Commercial Bank and Gerard Perri
21Subsidiaries of Registrant(13)
23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and (v) the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(1)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(2)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(3)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(4)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(5)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
116

(6)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(7)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(8)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(9)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(10)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2018 (File No. 001-38282).
(11)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2018 (File No. 001-38282).
(12)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
(13)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2017 (File No. 333-220805).
117