Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to ___________

Commission File Number001-37379

The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
14-1961545

Delaware

14-1961545

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

411 W. 14th Street, 2nd Floor, New York, New York

10014

1624 Market Street, Suite 311, Denver, Colorado

80202

(Address of principal executive offices)

Zip Code

646-624-2400

646-624-2400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Classeach class

Title of each class

Name of Each Exchange

each exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share

STKS

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx  No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging"emerging growth company”company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨

Accelerated filer  ¨

Non-accelerated filer  ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company  x

Emerging growth company  ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to not use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes¨ Nox

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stockequity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) computed by reference to the price at which the common stockequity was last sold, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $35,694,779.

$26,794,876.

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of April 6, 2018:  27,252,101February 28, 2021:  29,120,116

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's proxy statement for its 2021 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

None


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

We would like to caution our readers that thisThis Annual Report on Form 10-K and certain information incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Forward-looking statements which are intended to speak only as of the date thereof, and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risk and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors discussed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Factors that might cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements may include matters such as future economic performance, general economic conditions, consumer preferences and spending, costs, competition, new product execution, restaurant openings or closings, operating margins, the availability of acceptable real estate locations, the sufficiency of our cash balances and cash generated from operations and financing activities for our future liquidity and capital resource needs, the impact on our business as a result of Federal and State legislation and local regulation, future litigation, the execution of our growth strategy and other matters. We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements by terminology including “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “appears,” “suggests,” “future,” “likely,” “goal,” “plans,” “potential,” “projects,” “predicts,” “should,” “targets,” “would,” “will” and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These risk and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors discussed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable law.

3


PART I

As used in this report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us,” refer to The OneONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context otherwise indicates. The term “year ended” refers to the entire calendar year, unless the context otherwise indicates.

Item 1. Business

Description of the Business

The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. isWe are a Delaware corporationglobal hospitality company that develops, owns and operates, ormanages and licenses upscale and polished casual, high-energy restaurants and lounges and provides turn-key food and beverage (“F&B”) services for hospitality venues including hotels, casinos and other high-end locations globally. We define turn-keylocations. Turn-key F&B services are food and beverage (“F&B”) services as those services that can be scaled, customized and implemented by us for the client at a particular hospitality venue and customized per the requirements of the client. We became The One Group Hospitality, Inc. through a reverse merger completed in October 2013.venue. Our stock trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol “STKS”.

We were established with the vision of becomingis to be a global market leader in the hospitality industry by melding high-quality service, ambiance, high-energy and cuisine into one great experience. experience that we refer to as “Vibe Dining”. We design all our restaurants, lounges and F&B services to create a social dining and high-energy entertainment experience within a destination location. We believe that this design and operating philosophy separates us from more traditional restaurant and foodservice competitors.

Our primary restaurant brand isbrands are STK, a multi-unit steakhouse concept that combines a high-energy, social atmosphere with the quality and service of a traditional upscale steakhouse.steakhouse, and Kona Grill, a polished casual bar-centric grill concept featuring American favorites, award-winning sushi, and specialty cocktails in a polished casual atmosphere. Our F&B hospitality management services are marketed as ONE Hospitality and include developing, managing and operating restaurants, bars, rooftop lounges, pools, banqueting and catering facilities, private dining rooms, room service and mini bars tailored to the specific needs of high-end hotels and casinos. Our F&B hospitality clients operate global hospitality brands such as the W Hotel, Cosmopolitan Hotel, Royalton, Hippodrome Casino, Hyatt and ME Hotels.

We opened our first restaurant in January 2004 in New York, City and as of December 31, 2017, we owned, operated,New York. We currently own, operate, manage or managed or licensed 31license 54 venues including 1420 STKs and 24 Kona Grills in major metropolitan cities in the United States,North America, Europe and the Middle East. In addition, we provided foodEast and beverage services10 F&B venues in five hotels and casinos. Wecasinos in the United States and Europe. In January 2021, we opened a managed STK restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona. For those restaurants and venues that are managed or licensed, we typically generate management fees based on top-line revenues and incentive fee revenue based on a percentage of the location’s revenues and net profits.

COVID-19

The negative effect on our business from thosethe novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) is significant. We experienced an initial decline in restaurant revenue that began in early March 2020 as travel began to decrease. Public anxiety with respect to COVID-19, and government recommendations and measures to avoid public gatherings especially within restaurants and lounges thatbars, have materially and adversely affected our operations and financial results. A more detailed description of the potential effects of COVID-19 on our business is contained in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Acquisitions

On October 4, 2019, we do not own, but instead manage on behalfacquired substantially all of the assets of Kona Grill Inc. and its affiliates (“Kona Grill”) comprising 24 domestic restaurants. We purchased the assets for a contractual price of $25.0 million plus approximately $1.5 million of consideration paid primarily for the apportionment of rent and utilities. We also assumed approximately $7.7 million in current liabilities. The purchase was financed with proceeds from the credit and guaranty agreement we entered into with Goldman Sachs Bank USA in conjunction with the acquisition (“Credit Agreement”). We have integrated Kona Grill by leveraging our F&Bcorporate infrastructure, our hospitality clients. Allbusiness knowledge and unique Vibe Dining program, to elevate the brand experience and drive improved performance.

4


Brands and Locations

The table below reflects our restaurants, loungesvenues by restaurant brand and F&B services are designed to create a social dining and high-energy entertainment experience within a destination location. We believe that this design and operating philosophy separates us from more traditional restaurant and foodservice competitors.geographic location:

Venues

    

STK(1)(2)

    

Kona Grill

    

ONE Hospitality(3)

    

Total

Domestic

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Owned

 

10

 

24

 

2

 

36

Managed

 

2

 

 

 

2

Licensed

 

1

 

 

 

1

Total domestic

 

13

 

24

 

2

 

39

International

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Owned

 

 

 

 

Managed

 

3

 

 

8

 

11

Licensed

 

4

 

 

 

4

Total international

 

7

 

 

8

 

15

Total venues

 

20

 

24

 

10

 

54

(1)3Locations with an STK and STK Rooftop are considered one venue location. This includes the STK Rooftop in San Diego, CA, which is a licensed location.
(2)Includes STK Scottsdale, a managed location for which a management agreement was in place as of December 31, 2020. STK Scottsdale opened in January 2021.
(3)Includes concepts under the Company’s F&B hospitality management agreements and other venue brands such as ANGEL, Heliot, Hideout, Marconi and Radio.

  Venues 
  STK  STK
Rooftop
  Bagatelle  F&B
Hospitality
  Total 
Company-owned  8   2   -   -   10 
Managed  4   -   -   13   17 
Licensed  2   1   -   -   3 
Other  -   -   1   -   1 
   14   3   1   13   31 

We expect to continue to expand our operations domestically and internationally primarily through a mix of owned, licensed restaurants and managed unitsrestaurants using a disciplined and targeted site selection process (“capitalprocess. We refer to this as our “capital light strategy”). We currently anticipate that our because it requires significantly less capital than expansion plans will require capital expenditures, net of improvement allowances, of $1.0 millionthrough owned restaurants. Refer to $2.0 million overItem 2 – Properties for additional details regarding the next 12 months. There can be no assurance thatdomestic and international locations in which we will be able to expand our operations at the rate we currently expect, or at all.operate.

STK

STK is a global steakhouse restaurant concept with locations in major metropolitan cities. STK artfully blends the modern steakhouse and a chic lounge, offering a high-energy, fine dining experience in a social atmosphere with the quality and service of a traditional upscale steakhouse. Each STK location features a large, open restaurant and bar area with a DJ playing music throughout the restaurant, offering our customers a high-energy, fun “destination” environment that encourages social interaction. We believe this Vibe Dining concept truly differentiates us from other upscale steakhouses. Our menu provides a variety of portion sizes and signature options to appeal to a broad customer demographic.

We currently operate eightten owned, fourfive managed and twofive licensed STK restaurants in major metropolitan cities such as Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Ibiza, Las Vegas, London, Los Angeles, Miami, Milan, New Yorkin North America, Europe and Orlando. We expect to open an STK restaurant in the Andaz Hotel in San Diego, California in the second quarter of 2018.

Our growth in 2018 is expected to continue with the planned opening of licensed locations in Puerto Rico, Dubai, Qatar and Mexico. We had plans to open company-owned restaurants in Austin and Dallas, TX, but have determined that opening these locations is not in line with our capital light strategy. Accordingly, we wrote off assets of $0.6 million in 2017 related to these locations.

Middle East. Our STK restaurants average approximately 10,000 to 11,000 square feet, and we typically target locations that range in size from 8,000 to 10,000 square feet. In 2017,2020, the average unit volume,restaurant revenues and average domestic check average and beverage mix for owned and managed STK restaurants that have been open 18 months at December 31, 20172020 were $10.8$6.9 million $110.39 and 37%,$114, respectively.

We are focused on expanding our global STK footprint. We believe that the locations of our STK restaurants are critical to our long-term success, and we devote significant time and resources to analyzing each prospective site.restaurant sites. We intend to continue our focus on (i) metropolitan areas with demographic and discretionary spending profiles that favor our high-end concepts and (ii) finding partners with excellent track records and brand recognition. We also consider factors such as traffic patterns, proximity to high-end shopping areas and office buildings, hotels and convention centers, area restaurant competition, accessibility and visibility. We have identified over 3075 additional major metropolitan areas across the globe where we could grow our STK brand to 200 restaurants over the next several years.foreseeable future. We expect to open as many as threefive to fivesix STKs annuallyannually.

5


Kona Grill

Kona Grill is a bar-centric grill concept featuring American favorites, award-winning sushi, and specialty cocktails in the foreseeable future primarily through licensing agreements, provideda polished casual atmosphere. Kona Grill offers freshly prepared food and attentive service in an upscale, contemporary ambiance that creates an exceptional dining experience that we have sufficient interestbelieve exceeds many traditional casual dining restaurants. Menu items are prepared from prospective licensees, acceptable locationsscratch at each restaurant location, creating memorable flavor profiles that appeal to a wide range of customers. The diverse menu is complemented by a full-service bar offering a broad assortment of wines, craft cocktails, and quality restaurant managers available to support that pace of growth. From time to time, based on the quality of the opportunity and our current strategy, we may open one or more company-owned restaurants.

F&B Hospitality Services Business

beers. We believe that through our developmental and operational knowledge and know-how, we are able to provide comprehensive tailored food and beverage solutionsthe Kona Grill brand is complementary to our hospitality clients. other brands and enables us to capture market share in the Vibe Dining segment.

We operate 24 owned Kona Grill restaurants within the United States, and our Kona Grill restaurants average approximately 7,200 square feet. In 2020, the average restaurant revenues and average domestic check for the Kona Grill restaurants were $3.3 million and $32, respectively.

ONE Hospitality

Our fee-based hospitality food and beverage solutions include developing, managing and operating restaurants, bars, rooftops, pools, banqueting, catering, private dining rooms, room service and mini bars on a contract basis. Currently we are operating under fiveONE Hospitality platform is composed of our F&B hospitality management agreements with hotels, casinos, and casinos throughout the United Statesother high-end locations as well as our other brands and in Europe. Historically, our clients have provided the majority of the capital required for the development of the facilities we manage on their behalf. venue concepts, which are described below:

ANGEL. ANGEL Rooftop bar and Dining, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2019, is a sophisticated Southern-Mediterranean restaurant with two indoor and outdoor bars, a floral garden patio, and a plunge pool located within the Hotel Calimala in Florence, Italy.
Heliot. Heliot Steak House is an award-winning steakhouse and bar within the Hippodrome Casino in London that offers impressive views of the main casino gambling floor.
Hideout. The Hideout by STK is an outdoor, poolside restaurant and bar within the W Hotel in Westwood, California, which complements our owned STK and F&B hospitality services also offered within the W Hotel in Westwood.
Marconi. The Marconi Lounge is a stylish and sophisticated lounge bar that we manage within the ME London hotel that offers an extensive cocktail menu in an upbeat atmosphere.
Radio. Radio Rooftop is a premier rooftop restaurant and lounge bar concept boasting striking city views with two signature locations on top of the ME London and ME Milan hotels.
F&B Services. Our F&B services for hospitality venues provide attractive and comprehensive tailored food and beverage solutions to our hospitality clients. Our fee-based hospitality food and beverage solutions include developing, managing and operating restaurants, bars, rooftops, pools, banquet and catering services, private dining rooms, in-room dining services and mini bars on a contract basis. Currently, we are operating under four F&B hospitality management agreements with hotels and casinos in the United States and in Europe. Historically, our clients have provided the majority of the capital required for the development of the facilities we manage on their behalf.

Our F&B hospitality contracts generate revenues for us through management fees, which are typically calculated as a percentage of the operation’s revenues, as well asand we earn additional milestone and incentive fees based on the operation’s profitability. We typically target F&B hospitality service opportunities where we believe we can generate at least $500,000 to $750,000 of annual pre-tax income.

We expect our food and beverageF&B hospitality services business to be an important driver of our growth and profitability, going forward, enabling us to generate management fee income with minimal capital expenditures.

4

We believe we are well positioned to leverage the strength of our brands and the relationships we have developed with global hospitality providers to drive the continued growth of our F&B hospitality business model.business. We continue to receive inbound inquiries regarding new opportunities globally, as well asand we continue to work with existing hospitality clients to identify and develop additional opportunities in their venues. Going forward, weWe expect to enter into one to two new F&B hospitality agreements annually.

Sourcing and Supply Chain

We seek to ensure consistent quality of thethat consistently high-quality food and beverages are served at all of our properties through the coordination and cooperation of our purchasing and culinary departments. All Our culinary and purchasing teams establish

6


product specifications are established on a global basis, by our culinary and purchasing teams, which are then disseminated to all locations through recipe books for all dishes served at our properties.

We maintain consistent high quality, pricing standards and procedures for all top volumetop-volume purchases at our restaurants. Suppliers are selected and pricing is negotiated on a national level in each country where one or more of our restaurants operate. We test new suppliers on a regional basis for an extended period prior to utilizingbefore using them on a national basis. We periodically review supplier consistency and satisfaction with our location chefs and continually research and evaluate products and supplies to ensure the meat, seafood and other menu ingredients that we purchase comply with our high qualityhigh-quality specifications. We also utilize purchasing software at some of our locations to facilitate a true bidding process on local purchases. In markets where we havedo not instituteduse this software, we require local chefs to seek bids from multiple suppliers to ensure competitive pricing. We believe we have strong relationships with national and regional foodservice distributors who can continue to supply us with our products on a consistent basis. Products are shipped directly to the restaurants from our suppliers.

Our corporate beverage program imposes guidelines for ordering beverage products at our properties. BeverageWe provide beverage managers at each location are provided with national guidelines for standardized products. We utilize a third-party company to conduct beverage inventory and cost reviews. Our concepts emphasize the bar as a driver of activity in the restaurants and in 2017,2020, the sale of alcoholic beverages accounted for approximately 34%25% of restaurant revenues.

On a company-wide basis, no supplier of food accounts for more than 30% of our total food and beverage purchases and no brand of alcohol accounts for more than 25% of suchour alcohol purchases. We believe that our food and beverage supplies are available from a significant number of alternate suppliers and that the loss of a supplier would not have a material adverse effect on our costs of supplies.

Advertising and Marketing

The primary focus of our advertising and marketing is to increase awareness of our brands and our overall reputation for quality, service and delivering a high-energy experience. Our marketing efforts are designed to strengthen our brand recognition in markets where we currently operate and to create brand awareness in new markets prior tobefore opening a new location. We use digital/social media channels, targeted local media such as magazines, billboards and other out of homeout-of-home advertising, and a strong internal public relations team to increase the frequency with which our existing customers visit our facilitiesrestaurants and to attract new customers. We conduct frequent promotional programs tailored to the city, brand and clientele of each location. The primary focus of our marketing is to increase awareness of our brand and our overall reputation for quality, service and delivering a high-energy experience. For example, our “Not Your Daddy’s Steakhouse” branding campaign for STK is integrated into marketing communications including digital, radio, print and outdoor advertisement. Additional marketing functions include the use of our website, www.togrp.com,websites, www.STKsteakhouse.com and www.KonaGrill.com, to facilitate online reservations, to-go/delivery orders and gift card sales to drive revenue.

Competition

The restaurant and hospitality industries are intensely competitive with respect to price, quality of service, location, ambiance of facilities and type and quality of food. We experience competition from a variety of sources, such asincluding upscale steakhouse chains such as Del Frisco’s, FlemingsFleming’s, Mastro’s and The Capital Grille, as well as local upscale steakhouses.steakhouses and polished casual chains, such as Brio Tuscan Grille, The Cheesecake Factory, P.F. Chang’s and Yard House. There is also competition from other upscale and high-energyVibe Dining restaurants such as Nobu, Lavo and Lavo, as well asTao and other high-end hospitality services companies such as the Gerber Group, Lettuce Entertain You and EsquaredESquared Hospitality. To the extent that we operate lounges and similar venues in hotels and resorts, we are subject to our host venues being able to compete effectively in attracting customers who would frequent our establishments.

5

Seasonality

Our business is subject to fluctuations due to seasonality and adverse weather. Because of the seasonality of the business and the industry, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for any other quarter or the full calendar year. Typically, our second and fourth quarters have higher sales volume than other quarters of the year.

7


Intellectual Property

Our rights in our registered and unregistered intellectual property, including trademarks and service marks, are significant to our business. We are the owners ofown the U.S. federal registration rights to the “STK,” “Cucina Asellina”“Kona Grill,” and “Asellina” marks, as well as several related word marks and design marks related to our brands. We depend on registered and unregistered trademarks and service marks to maintain the identity of our locations. We license the rights to use certain trademarks we own or license to our licensees in connection with their operations. We also own several other trademarks and service marks. It is our policy to defend our marks against encroachment by others.

Employees

Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we employed 50 persons (inclusive of 7 in reservations and 6 in event planning) inapproximately 52 corporate employees within our corporate officeoffices and an aggregate of 103220 full-time, salaried employees at all of our locations. In addition, weWe rely on hourly-wage employees for kitchen staff, servers, bussers, runners, polishers, hosts, bartenders, barbacks, reservationists, administrative support, and interns. Average head countThe average headcount for employees in our domestic restaurants is 88.65. Combining full-time and part-time employees, we employ and manage approximately 2,0003,000 persons worldwide. We have never experienced a work stoppage, and none of our employees are not represented by a labor organization.

Our human capital objectives include attracting, developing, rewarding, and retaining our existing and new employees. We offer our employees online training courses and on-the-job training. Restaurant management trainees undergo training in order to understand all aspects of our restaurant operations. We provide our employees with cash-based performance bonuses. We also have an equity incentive compensation plan to provide certain management-level or other key employees with stock-based awards. We monitor our progress with metrics such as employee performance measures, turnover rates and restaurant customer surveys.

The health and safety of our employees is our highest priority. In protecting our employees’ safety, we have invested in creating a safe work environment for our employees and guests by taking additional measures. We have increased cleaning protocols, implemented daily temperature screenings and health and safety checklists and provided additional personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies. For all employees, we require masks to be worn in all restaurants and offices where allowed by local law and provide regular communication regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including health and safety protocols and procedures.

Government Regulation

Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local governmental regulation, including health, safety, labor, sanitation, building and fire agencies in the state, county, municipality or jurisdiction in which the restaurant is located. In certain states, our restaurants are subject to “dram shop” statutes, which generally provides a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person. We maintain the necessary restaurant, alcoholic beverage and retail licenses, permits and approvals. Federal and state labor laws govern our relationship with our employees and affect operating costs. The development and construction of additional restaurants are also subject to compliance with applicable zoning, land use and environmental regulations. A failure to comply with one or more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of restaurants for an indeterminate period of time, fines or third partythird-party litigation.

Available Information

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act. We therefore file periodperiodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Such reports may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site (www.sec.gov)(www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Additionally, copies of our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and any amendments to such reports are available for viewing and copying through our internet site (www.togrp.com)(www.togrp.com), free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the SEC. We typically post information about us on our website under

8


the Investor Relations tab, including materials used at investor conferences. We do not incorporate any information found or accessible through our website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We also make available on our website and in print to any stockholder who requests it, our Audit and Compensation CommitteesCommittee charters, as well as the Code of Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and associates of the company.Company. Amendments to these documents or waivers related to the Code of Conduct will be made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after their execution.

6

Item 1A. Risk Factors

RISK FACTORS

Ownership of our common stock involves certain risks. Holders of our common stock and prospective investors should carefully consider the following risks and other information contained in this document, including our historical financial statements and related notes included herein. The following risk factors could materially adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline, perhaps significantly, and you may lose part or all of your investment. The risks and uncertainties below are all those that we have identified as material but may not be the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Our business is subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, including overall economic and industry conditions.

Health and Safety

The outbreak of COVID-19 has, and will continue to, significantly affect our restaurant traffic and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outbreak of COVID-19 and government actions to contain COVID-19 have materially and adversely affected our restaurant traffic and our business, and will continue to materially and adversely affect us for an extended period. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020 government agencies declared a state of emergency in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions where we operate, and some government agencies restricted movement, required restaurant and bar closures, and advised people not to visit restaurants or bars. In some jurisdictions, people were instructed to stay at home to reduce the spread of COVID-19. In response to these conditions, we temporarily closed several restaurants and shifted operations at others to provide only take-out and delivery service. Although most of our restaurants have been allowed to open for outdoor dining or in-person dining they are subject to seating capacity restrictions to allow for social distancing.

A prolonged occurrence and resurgence of COVID-19 cases may result in state or local governments implementing further guidelines, including travel restrictions, social distancing requirements and additional restrictions on the restaurant industry, including closures or partial closures. We are unable to predict how long the pandemic will last, what additional restrictions may be enacted, the extent to which our restaurants may be impacted if a significant number of our employees are diagnosed with COVID-19, or if an outbreak of COVID-19 is traced to one of our restaurants.

We have made operational changes to adhere to government requirements on safety and sanitation in our restaurants. However, we cannot guarantee that changes to our operational policies and training will be effective to keep our employees and customers safe from COVID-19. COVID-19 may impact the willingness of customers to dine outside of the home. While it is not possible at this time to estimate the full impact that COVID-19 could have on our business going forward, the continued spread of the virus and the measures taken by governments or by us in response could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In response to the challenging business environment, we obtained CARES Act Loans as described in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements. At this time, we anticipate forgiveness of the entire amount of the CARES Act Loans; however, no assurance can be provided that we will obtain forgiveness of the CARES Act Loans in whole or in part.

9


Health concerns arising from outbreaks of flu viruses or other diseases, or regional or global health pandemic could severely affect our business.

The United States and other countries have experienced, or may experience in the future, outbreaks of viruses, such as coronavirus, norovirus, Avian Flu or “SARS,” and H1N1 or “swine flu,” or other diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as “mad cow disease.” If a virus is transmitted by human contact, our employees or customers may become infected, or may choose, or be advised, to avoid gathering in public places, any of which may adversely affect the guest traffic at our restaurants and the ability to adequately staff our restaurants, receive deliveries on a timely basis or perform functions at the corporate level. We also may be adversely affected if jurisdictions in which we have restaurants impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures or impose restrictions on operations. Even if such measures are not implemented and a virus or other disease does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or significant health risk may adversely affect our business.

To the extent that a virus or disease is food-borne, or perceived to be food-borne, future outbreaks may adversely affect the price and availability of certain food products and cause our customers to eat less of a product. For example, health concerns relating to the consumption of beef or to specific events such as the outbreak of “mad cow disease” may adversely impact sales of our beef-related menu items. In addition, public concern over “avian flu” may cause fear about the consumption of chicken, eggs and other products derived from poultry. The inability to serve beef or poultry-based products would restrict our ability to provide a variety of menu items to our customers. If we change our menu in response to such concerns, we may lose customers who do not prefer the new menu, and we may not be able to sufficiently attract new customers to produce the revenue needed to restore the profitability of our restaurant operations. We also may generate different or additional competitors for our intended customers as a result of such a menu change and may not be able to successfully compete against such competitors.

Failure to protect food supplies and adhere to food safety standards could result in food borne illnesses and adversely affect our business.

Failure to protect our food supply or enforce food safety policies, such as proper food temperature and adherence to shelf life dates, could result in food-borne illnesses to our guests. Also, our reputation of providing high-quality food is an important factor in our guests choosing our restaurants. Whether or not traced to our restaurants or those of our competitors, instances of food borne illness or other food safety issues could reduce the demand for certain or all of our menu offerings. If any of our guest become ill from consuming our products, the affected restaurants may be forced to close and we may be subject to legal liability. An instance of food contamination from one of our restaurants or suppliers could have far-reaching effects, as the contamination, or the perception of contamination could affect any or all of our restaurants. Publicity related to either product contamination, recalls, or food-borne illness, including Bovine-Spongiform Encephalopathy, which is also known as BSE or mad cow disease, aphthous fever, which is also known as hoof and mouth disease, and hepatitis A, listeria, salmonella and e-coli may also injure our brand and may affect the selection of our restaurants by our guests or licensees based on fear of such illnesses. In addition, the occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, which could result in disruptions in our supply chain and/or lower margins for us and our licensees.

Economic Conditions and Competition

Our business is dependent on discretionary spending patterns, business travel and overall general economic conditions.

We together with the rest of the restaurant industry, depend on consumer discretionary spending, business travel and the overall economic environment. Disruptions in the overall economy, including recessions, high unemployment, foreclosures, bankruptcies and other economic impacts, could affect consumers’ ability and willingness to spend discretionary dollars. Reductions in business travel and dining, which we believe accounts for a majority of our weekday revenues at our hotel-based restaurants and food and beverage services operations, would adversely affect our revenues. Reductions in discretionary income and spending also would also impact our casino-based restaurants and food and beverage services operations. If uncertain economic conditions were to persist for an extended period of time or worsen, consumers might make long-lasting changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including dining out less frequently. Adverse changes in consumer discretionary spending could be affected by many different factors that are out of our control, including international, national and local economic conditions, any of which could harm our business prospects, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

10


Continued uncertainty in or a worsening of the economy, generally or in a number of our markets, and our customers’ reactions to these trends could adversely affect our business and cause us to, among other things, reduce the number and frequency of new location openings, close locations and delay ourany re-modeling of existing locations. Our success will depend in part upon our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to changing economic and other conditions.

We have a limited number of venues in the cities whereand we operate multiple venues in some cities and are therefore sensitive to economic and other trends and developments in these cities.

We typically operate one to three venues in the cities where we operate. In the foreseeable future, we will continue to maintainhave a relatively small number of restaurants and F&B service locations.locations, and we operate multiple venues in some cities. We typically operate one to six venues in the cities where we operate. Accordingly, particularly in cities where we have multiple venues, our business is susceptible to adverse changes in these markets whether as a result of declining economic conditions, declining stock market performance, negative publicity, and changes in customer preferences or for other reasons, and any such adverse changes may have a disproportionate effect on our overall results of operations as compared to some of our competitors that may have less restaurant concentration.concentration or that do not operate in our markets. Any regional occurrences such as local labor strikes, natural disasters, prolonged inclement weather, acts of terrorism or other national emergencies, accidents, energy shortages, system failures or other unforeseen events in or around these cities could result in temporary or permanent closings of our venues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations as a whole.

Unsuccessful implementation of any or all of the initiatives of our business strategy, including opening new restaurants and attracting new F&B hospitality service opportunities, could negatively impact our operations.

Our success depends in part on our ability to understand and satisfy the needs of our guests and licensees. Our key strategies are to:

-Drive same store sales;
-Improve operational efficiency at our restaurants;
-Reduce corporate general and administrative expenses; and
-Grow our portfolio through licensing and management deals.

Improving comparable location sales and restaurant-level margins depends in part on whether we are able to achieve revenue growth through increases in the average check and increases in customer traffic, and to further expand our private dining business at each location. We believe there are opportunities to increase the average check at our locations through selective introduction of higher priced items and increases in menu pricing. We also believe that expanding and enhancing our private dining capacity will also increase our location sales, as our private dining business typically has a higher average check and higher overall margins than regular dining room business. We believe select price increases have not historically adversely impacted customer traffic; however, we expect that there is a price level at which point customer traffic would be adversely affected. It is also possible that these changes could cause our sales volume to decrease. If we are not able to increase our sales at existing locations for any reason, our profitability and results of operations could be adversely affected.

7

One key element of our growth strategy is opening new restaurants and F&B hospitality services locations. We believe there are opportunities to open approximately four to seven new locations (restaurants and/or hospitality services operations) annually, with a focus on operating under licensing or management agreements (referred to as our “capital light strategy”). However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to open new restaurants or F&B hospitality services locations at the rate that we currently expect.

Our success in growing our business through the opening of new restaurants and F&B hospitality locations is dependent upon a number of factors, including our ability to: operate in markets that we are not familiar with, find suitable license and food and beverage partners, find suitable locations, reach acceptable lease terms, have adequate capital, find acceptable contractors, obtain licenses and permits, manage construction and development costs, recruit and train appropriate staff and properly manage the new venue. Unanticipated costs or delays in the development or construction of future restaurants could impede our ability to open new restaurants timely and cost effectively, which could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, some of the factors that adversely affect the cost and time associated with the development and construction of our restaurants include: labor disputes, shortages of materials or skilled labor, adverse weather conditions, unforeseen engineering problems, environmental problems, construction or zoning problems, local government regulations, modifications in design, and other unanticipated increases in cost.

Additionally, our venues are expensive to build and we and our licensees incur significant capital and pre-opening expense. Our business and profitability may be adversely affected if the “ramp-up” period for a new location lasts longer than we expect or if the profitability of a new location dips after our initial “ramp-up” marketing program ends. New locations may not be profitable and their sales performance may not follow historical or projected patterns. If we are forced to close any new operations, we will incur losses for certain buildout costs as well as pre-opening expenses incurred in connection with opening such operations.

Competition in the restaurant industry is intense.

The restaurant and hospitality industry is intensely competitive with respect to price, quality of service, location, ambiance of facilities and type and quality of food. The industry is also characterized by the continual introduction of new concepts and is subject to rapidly changing consumer preferences, tastes, trends and eating and purchasing habits. Our success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond quickly to changing consumer preferences, as well asand other factors affecting the restaurant and hospitality industry, including new market entrants and demographic changes. Shifts in consumer preferences away from upscale steakhouses or beef in general, which are significant components of our concepts’ menus and appeal, whether as a result of economic, competitive or other factors, could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

A substantial number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as independently owned restaurants, compete with us for customers, restaurant locations and qualified management and other restaurant staff. The principal competitors for our concepts are other upscale steakhouse chains such as Del Frisco’s, Mastro’s, Fleming’s, Prime Steakhouse and Wine BarMastro’s and The Capital Grille, and local upscale steakhouses as well as local upscale steakhouses.polished casual chains such as Brio Tuscan Grille, The Cheesecake Factory, P.F. Chang’s and Yard House. There is also competition from non-steak but upscale and high-energy restaurants, as well asand other high-end hospitality services companies and high-energy nightlife concepts. To the extent that our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are located in hotels, casinos, resorts and similar client locations, we are subject to competition in the broader lodging and hospitality markets that could draw potential customers away from our locations.

Some of our competitors have greater financial, marketing and operating resources than we do, have been in business longer, have greater name recognition and are better established in the markets where our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are located or where we may expand. In addition, improved product offerings in the fast casual segment of the restaurant industry, combined with the effects of negative economic conditions and other factors, may lead consumers to choose less expensive alternatives. Our inability to compete successfully with other restaurants, other F&B hospitality services operations and other segments of the industry may harm our ability to maintain acceptable levels of revenue growth, limit our development of new restaurants or concepts, or force us to close one or more of our restaurants or F&B hospitality services operations.

We may also need to evolve our concepts in order to compete with popular new restaurant or F&B hospitality services operation formats, concepts or trends that emerge from time to time, and we cannot provide any assurance that any changes we make to any of our concepts in response will be successful or not adversely affect our profitability.

11


Strategy and Operations

Unsuccessful implementation of any or all of the initiatives of our business strategy, including opening new restaurants and attracting new F&B hospitality service opportunities, could negatively impact our operations.

Our success depends in part on our ability to understand and satisfy the needs of our guests and licensees. Our key strategies are to:

8Drive same store sales;
Improve operational efficiency at our restaurants;
Reduce corporate general and administrative expenses; and
Grow our portfolio primarily through licensing and management deals.

Improving comparable location sales and restaurant-level margins depends in part on whether we are able to achieve revenue growth through increases in the average check and increases in customer traffic, and to further expand our private dining business at each location and delivery service business in markets where offered. We believe there are opportunities to increase the average check at our locations through selective introduction of higher priced items and increases in menu pricing. We also believe that expanding and enhancing our private dining capacity will also increase our location sales, as our private dining business typically has a higher average check and higher overall margins than regular dining room business. We believe that expanding the markets in which we offer third-party delivery services will also result in incremental sales. We believe select price increases have not historically adversely impacted customer traffic; however, we expect that there is a price level at which point customer traffic would be adversely affected. It is also possible that these changes could cause our sales volume to decrease. If we are not able to increase our sales at existing locations for any reason, our profitability and results of operations could be adversely affected.

One key element of our growth strategy is opening new restaurants and F&B hospitality services locations. We believe there are opportunities to open approximately six to eight new locations (restaurants and/or hospitality services operations) annually, with a focus on operating under licensing or management agreements (referred to as our “capital light strategy”). However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to open new restaurants or F&B hospitality services locations at the rate that we currently expect.

Our success in growing our business through the opening of new restaurants and F&B hospitality locations is dependent upon a number of factors, including our ability to: cost-effectively operate in markets that we are not familiar with, find suitable license and food and beverage partners, find suitable locations, reach acceptable lease terms, have adequate capital, find acceptable contractors, obtain licenses and permits, manage construction and development costs, recruit and train appropriate staff and properly manage the new venue. Unanticipated costs or delays in the development or construction of future restaurants could impede our ability to open new restaurants timely and cost-effectively, which could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, some of the factors that adversely affect the cost and time associated with the development and construction of our restaurants include: labor disputes, shortages of materials or skilled labor, adverse weather conditions, unforeseen engineering problems, environmental problems, construction or zoning problems, local government regulations, modifications in design, and other unanticipated increases in cost.

Additionally, our venues are expensive to build, and we and management unit partners and our licensees incur significant capital and pre-opening expense. Our business and profitability may be adversely affected if the “ramp-up” period for a new location lasts longer than we expect or if the profitability of a new location dips after our initial “ramp-up” marketing program ends. New locations may not be profitable, and their sales performance may not follow historical or projected patterns. If we are forced to close any new operations, we will incur losses for certain buildout costs and pre-opening expenses incurred in connection with opening such operations.

We face a variety of risks associated with doing business with licensees.

We rely in part on our licensees and the manner in which they operate the STK restaurants to develop and promote our business. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we operated six licensed STK restaurants. In 2021, one of our licensees operated STK restaurants in Ibiza and Dubai and operate

12


permanently closed an STK Rooftoprestaurant in San Diego, CADubai as a result of COVID-19 and we are currently working with other licenseesthe decision to open additional restaurantsconsolidate operations into the remaining STK restaurant in Puerto Rico, Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Mexico. Dubai.

Our licensees are required to operate our restaurants according to the specific guidelines we set forth, which are essential to maintaining brand integrity and reputation, as well as in accordance with all laws and regulations applicable to us, and all laws and regulations applicable in the countries in which we operate. We provide training to these licensees to integrate them into our operating strategy and culture. However, since we do not have day-to-day control over all of these restaurants, we cannot give assurance that there will not be differences in product and service quality, operations, labor law enforcement, marketing or profitability or that there will be adherence to all of our guidelines and applicable laws. In addition, if our licensees fail to make investments necessary to maintain or improve the restaurants, guest preference for our brand could suffer. Our licensees are subject to business risks similar to those we face such as competition; customer acceptance; fluctuations in the cost, quality and availability of raw ingredients; increased labor costs; difficulty obtaining acceptable site leases; and difficulty obtaining proper financing. Failure of licensed restaurants to operate effectively could adversely affect our cash flows from those operations or have a negative impact on our reputation and our business.

The success of our licensed operations depends on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with our licensees. The value of our brand and the rapport that we maintain with our licensees are important factors for potential licensees considering doing business with us. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with licensees, we may be unable to renew license agreements and opportunities for developing new relationships with additional licensees may be adversely affected. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Although we have developed criteria to evaluate and screen prospective developers and licensees, we cannot be certain that the developers and licensees we select will have the business acumen necessary to open and operate successful licensed venues restaurants in their licensing areas, or that the licensees, once selected, will be able to negotiate acceptable lease or purchase terms for prospective sites or to obtain the necessary approvals for such sites, or that financing will be available to construct and open new venues.

To the extent that our operations are located in hotels, casinos or similar destinations, our results of operations and growth are subject to the risks facing such venues.

Our ability to grow and realize profits from our operations in hotels, casinos and other branded or destination venues are dependent on the success of such venues’ business. We are subject to the actions and business decisions of our clients and third parties, in which we may have little or no influence in the overall operation of the applicable venue and such actions and decisions could have an adverse effect on our business and operations. For example, in 2015, a third party contractor working on an unrelated matter caused a sprinkler head to break, resulting in water damage resulting in the opening of one of our restaurants to be delayed.

We depend upon frequent deliveries of food, alcoholLabor and other supplies, which subjects us to the possible risks of shortages, interruptions and price fluctuations.Supplies

Our ability to maintain consistent quality throughout our locations depends in part upon our ability to acquire fresh products, including beef, seafood, quality produce and related items from reliable sources in accordance with our specifications. We currently purchase our food products from various suppliers. We have elected to purchase our beef from a limited number of suppliers. If there were any shortages, interruptions or significant price fluctuations in beef or seafood or if our suppliers were unable to perform adequately or fail to distribute products or supplies to our restaurants, or terminate or refuse to renew any contract with us, this could cause a short-term increase of our costs or cause us to remove certain items from our menu, increase the price of certain offerings or temporarily close a location, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In addition, we purchase beer, wine and spirits from distributors who own the exclusive rights to sell such alcoholic beverage products in the geographic areas in which our locations reside. Our continued ability to purchase certain brands of alcoholic beverages depends upon maintaining our relationships with those distributors, of which there can be no assurance. In the event any of our alcohol beverage distributors cease to supply us, we may be forced to offer brands of alcoholic beverage which have less consumer appeal or that do not match our brand image, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

9

Increases in commodity prices would adversely affect our results of operations.

Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in commodity costs, which have a substantial effect on our total costs. The purchase of beef typically represents approximately 33% of our food and beverage costs. The market for beef is subject to extreme price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate conditions, the price of feed, industry demand, energy demand and other factors. We may enter into fixed price supply contracts or consider other risk management strategies with regard to our meat and other food costs to minimize the impact of potential price fluctuations. Our ability to forecast and manage our commodities could significantly affect our gross margins. Energy prices can also affect our operating results, as increased energy prices may cause increased transportation costs for beef and other commodities and supplies, as well as increased costs for the utilities required to run each location. Historically we have passed increased commodity and other costs on to our customers by increasing the prices of our menu items. While we believe these price increases have historically not affected customer traffic, there can be no assurance that additional price increases would not affect future customer traffic. If prices increase in the future and we are unable to anticipate or mitigate these increases, or if there are shortages for beef, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Failure to protect food supplies and adhere to food safety standards could result in food borne illnesses and adversely affect our business.

We believe that food safety and reputation for quality is of significance to any company that, like us, operates in the restaurant industry. Food safety, including the prevention of tampering or contamination, is a focus of increased government regulatory initiatives at the local, state and federal levels.

Failure to protect our food supply or enforce food safety policies, such as proper food temperature and adherence to shelf life dates, could result in food-borne illnesses to our guests. Also, our reputation of providing high quality food is an important factor in our guests choosing our restaurants. Whether or not traced to our restaurants or those of our competitors, instances of food borne illness or other food safety issues could reduce the demand for certain or all of our menu offerings. If any of our guest become ill from consuming our products, the affected restaurants may be forced to close and we may be subject to legal liability. An instance of food contamination from one of our restaurants or suppliers could have far-reaching effects, as the contamination, or the perception of contamination could affect any or all of our restaurants. Publicity related to either product contamination, recalls, or food-borne illness, including Bovine-Spongiform Encephalopathy, which is also known as BSE or mad cow disease, aphthous fever, which is also known as hoof and mouth disease, as well as hepatitis A, listeria, salmonella and e-coli may also injure our brand and may affect the selection of our restaurants by our guests or licensees based on fear of such illnesses. In addition, the occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, which could result in disruptions in our supply chain and/or lower margins for us and our licensees.

We face the risk of adverse publicity in connection with our operations, including as a result of increased social media usage.

The quality of our food and our facilities are two of our competitive strengths. Therefore, adverse publicity, whether accurate or not, relating to food quality, public health concerns, illness, safety, injury or government or industry findings concerning our venues or those operated by others could negatively impact us. Any shifts in consumer preferences away from the kinds of food we offer, particularly beef, whether because of dietary or other health concerns or otherwise, would make our locations less appealing and could reduce customer traffic and/or impose practical limits on pricing.

The use of social media platforms allows individuals to access a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. Consumers value readily available information concerning goods and services that they have or plan to purchase and may act on such information without further investigation or authentication. Many social media platforms immediately publish content from their subscribers and participants, often without filters or checks on the accuracy of the content posted. Information concerning our company may be posted on such platforms at any time. If customers perceive or experience a reduction in our food quality, service or ambiance or in any way believe we have failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, the opportunity to disseminate this information immediately is seemingly limitless and readily available. This information may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may harm our performance, prospects or business.

We face the risk of litigation in connection with our operations.

We are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from our consumers alleging, among other things, illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. The inappropriate use of social media vehicles by our employees or customers could lead to litigation and result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation. In addition, third party and employee claims against us based on, among other things, alleged discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination, or labor code violations may divert financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit our future performance. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our operations. In addition, they may generate negative publicity, which could reduce customer traffic and sales. Although we maintain what we believe to be adequate levels of insurance commensurate with the nature and extent of our operations, insurance may not be available at all or in sufficient amounts to cover any liabilities with respect to these matters. A significant increase in the number of these claims or in the number of such claims that are successful could materially adversely affect our brand, financial condition or operating results. Like most employee practices liability insurance policies, our policy does not provide protection against hour and wage claims, and therefore litigation in the area could adversely impact our financial condition.

10

We occupy most of our restaurants and some of our food and beverage hospitality services locations under long-term non-cancelable leases under which we may remain obligated to perform even if we close those operations, and we may be unable to renew leases at the end of their terms.

Most of our restaurants and some of our food and beverage hospitality operations are currently located in premises that we lease. Many of our current leases are non-cancelable and typically have terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with renewal options for terms ranging from 1 to 5 years. We believe that future leases that we enter into will be on substantially similar terms. Fixed payments and/or minimum percentage rent payments under our operating leases and management agreements account for a significant portion of our operating expenses. This may increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, limit our ability to obtain additional financing, and limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business.

We depend on cash flow from operations to pay our obligations and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities and sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from borrowings under our term loan facility or other sources, we may not be able to meet our operating lease and management agreement obligations, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

If we were to close or fail to open a restaurant or other venue at a location we lease, we would generally remain committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, which could include, among other things, payment of the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Our obligation to continue making rental payments and fulfilling other lease obligations in respect of leases for closed or unopened restaurants could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Alternatively, at the end of the lease term and any renewal period for a restaurant, we may be unable to renew the lease without substantial additional cost, if at all. If we cannot renew such a lease we may be forced to close or relocate a restaurant, which could subject us to construction and other costs and risks.

Additionally, negative effects on our existing and potential landlords due to the inaccessibility of credit and other unfavorable economic factors may adversely affect our business and results of operations. If our landlords are unable to obtain financing or remain in good standing under their existing financing arrangements, they may be unable to provide construction contributions or satisfy other lease covenants to us. If any landlord files for bankruptcy protection, the landlord may be able to reject our lease in the bankruptcy proceedings. While we would under some circumstances have the option to retain our rights under the lease, we could not compel the landlord to perform any of its obligations and would be left with damages (which are subject to collectability risk) as our sole recourse. Our development of new locations may also be adversely affected by the negative financial situations of potential developers, landlords and host sites. Such parties may delay or cancel development projects or renovations of existing projects due to the instability in the credit markets and recent declines in consumer spending. This could reduce the number of high-quality locations available that we would consider for our new operations or cause the quality of the sites in which the restaurants and food and beverage hospitality services operations are located to deteriorate. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our existing businesses or cause us to curtail new projects.

Our operations may be negatively impacted by seasonality, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters or acts of terror.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters that may at times affect the regions in which our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are located, regions that supply or produce food products for our restaurants, or locations of our distribution network. As a result of the seasonality of our business due to weather, holiday events and other factors, our quarterly results for any one quarter or fiscal year may not be indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.

In addition, if adverse weather conditions or natural disasters such as fires and hurricanes affect our restaurants, we could experience closures, repair and restoration costs, food spoilage, and other significant reopening costs, any of which would adversely affect our business. For example, we believe that the poor weather conditions in the New York City area at the end of 2014 and the beginning of 2015, as well as Hurricane Irma in Florida in 2017, had a negative impact on our sales and results of operations. We could also experience shortages or delayed shipments at our restaurants if adverse weather or natural disasters affect our distribution network, which could adversely affect our restaurants and our business as a whole. Additionally, during periods of extreme temperatures (either hot or cold) or precipitation, we may experience a reduction in customer traffic, which could adversely affect our restaurants and our business as a whole. Weather conditions are impossible to predict as is the negative impact on our business that such conditions might cause. Catastrophic weather conditions are likely to affect the supply of and costs for food products. If we do not anticipate or react to changing food costs by adjusting our purchasing practices or menu prices, our operating margins would likely deteriorate.

Terrorism, including cyber-terrorism or efforts to tamper with food supplies, could have an adverse impact on our brand and results of operations.

11

Security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business, prevent us from accessing critical information or expose us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and our reputation

We utilize information technology systems and networks to process, transmit and store electronic information in connection with our business activities. As the use of digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication. These threats pose a risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, all of which are vital to our operations and business strategy. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing cyber-attacks or successfully mitigating their effects.

We estimate that approximately 75% our sales are by credit or debit cards. Other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information has been stolen. We may in the future become subject to claims for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of credit or debit card information, and we may also be subject to lawsuits or other proceedings relating to these types of incidents. Further, in 2015, the major credit card networks shifted the liability associated with EMV (Europay/Mastercard/Visa) chip card technology to the merchants. With this liability shift, any restaurant or merchant that is not using an approved chip-and-pin point-of-sale device would be liable for counterfeit or fraudulent charges (aka chargebacks).

The majority of our sales are by credit or debit cards, and other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which such information has been stolen. Additionally, in 2015, the major credit card networks shifted the liability associated with EMV (Europay/Mastercard/Visa) chip card technology to the merchants; with this shift, any restaurant or merchant that is not using an approved chip and pin point of sale device could become liable for counterfeit or fraudulent charges, or chargebacks. Despite the implementation of security measures (such as the employment of internal resources and external consultants to conduct auditing and testing for weaknesses in our informational technology environment), our internal computer systems and those of our contract research organizations and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage or disruption from hacking, computer viruses, software bugs, unauthorized access or disclosure, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication, equipment and electrical failures. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will promptly detect any such disruption or security breach, if at all. Unauthorized access, loss or dissemination could disrupt our operations, including our ability to conduct research and development activities, process and prepare company financial information, and manage various general and administrative aspects of our business. To the extent that any such disruption or security breach results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure or theft of confidential, proprietary or personal information, we could incur liability, suffer reputational damage or poor financial performance or become the subject of regulatory actions by state, federal or non-US authorities, any of which could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to numerous and changing U.S. federal and foreign government regulations. Failure to comply with or substantial changes in government regulations could negatively affect our sales, increase our costs or result in fines or other penalties against us.

Each of our venues is subject to licensing and regulation by the health, sanitation, safety, labor, building environmental (including but not limited to disposal, pollution, and the presence of hazardous substances) and fire agencies of the respective states, counties, cities, and municipalities in which it is located, as well as under federal law. These regulations govern the preparation and sale of food, the sale of alcoholic beverages, the sale and use of tobacco, zoning and building codes, land use and employee, health, sanitation and safety matters. Alcoholic beverage control regulations govern various aspects of our locations’ daily operations, including the minimum age of patrons and employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing and inventory control, handling and storage.  Typically, our locations’ licenses to sell alcoholic beverages must be renewed annually and may be suspended or revoked at any time for cause. A failure to comply with one or more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of facilities for an indeterminate period of time, or third party litigation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.

12

Government regulation can also affect customer traffic at our locations. A number of states, counties and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to disclose certain nutritional information. For example, despite judicial and congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), the ACA currently establishes a uniform, federal requirement for restaurant chains with 20 or more locations operating under the same trade name and offering substantially the same menus to post nutritional information on their menus, including the total number of calories. The law also requires such restaurants to provide to consumers, upon request, a written summary of detailed nutritional information, including total calories and calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, complex carbohydrates, sugars, dietary fiber, and total protein in each serving size or other unit of measure, for each standard menu item. The Food and Drug Administration is also permitted to require additional nutrient disclosures, such as trans-fat content. We are not currently subject to requirements to post nutritional information on our menus or in our locations though there can be no assurance that we will not become subject to these requirements in the future. Our compliance with the Affordable Care Act or other similar laws to which we may become subject could reduce demand for our menu offerings, reduce customer traffic and/or reduce average revenue per customer, which would have an adverse effect on our revenue. Any reduction in customer traffic related to these or other government regulations could affect revenues and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our foreign operations are subject to all of the same risks as our domestic restaurants and food and beverage hospitality services operations, as well as additional risks including, among others, international economic and political conditions and the possibility of instability and unrest, differing cultures and consumer preferences, diverse government regulations and tax systems, the ability to source fresh ingredients and other commodities in a cost-effective manner and the availability of experienced management.

We are subject to governmental regulation throughout the world, including, without limitation, antitrust and tax requirements, anti-boycott regulations, import/export/customs regulations and other international trade regulations, the USA PATRIOT Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Any new regulatory or trade initiatives could impact our operations in certain countries. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes to wage, immigration and labor laws could increase our costs substantially.

Under the minimum wage laws in most domestic jurisdictions, we are permitted to pay certain hourly employees a wage that is less than the base minimum wage for general employees because these employees receive tips as a substantial part of their income. As of December 31, 2017,2020, approximately 32%30% of our employees earn this lower minimum wage in their respective locations since tips constitute a substantial part of their income. If cities, states or the federal government change their laws to require all employees to be paid the general employee minimum base wage regardless of supplemental tip income, our labor costs would increase substantially. Certain states in which we operate restaurants also have adopted or are considering adopting minimum wage statutes that exceed the federal minimum wage. We may be unable or unwilling to increase our prices in order to pass these increased labor costs on to our customers, in which case, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

A restaurant company employer may claim a credit against the company’s federal income taxes for FICA taxes paid on certain tip wages (the “FICA tip credit”). We utilize the federal FICA tip credit to reduce our periodic federal income tax expense. Changes in the tax law could reduce or eliminate the FICA tip credit, which could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows in future periods.

13


Further, the U.S. Congress and Department of Homeland Security may implement changes to federal immigration laws, regulations or enforcement programs. Some of these changes may increase our obligations for compliance and oversight, which could subject us to additional costs and make our hiring process more cumbersome, or reduce the availability of potential employees. Even if we operate our restaurants in strict compliance with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and state requirements, some of our employees may not meet federal work eligibility or residency requirements, which could lead to a disruption in our work force. Although we require all of our new employees to provide us with the government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers are subject to seizure and deportation and may subject us to fines, penalties or loss of our business license in certain jurisdictions. Additionally, a government audit could result in a disruption to our workforce or adverse publicity that could negatively impact our brand and our use of E-Verify and/or potential for receipt of letters from the Social Security Administration requesting information (commonly referred to as no-match letters) could make it more difficult to recruit and/or retain qualified employees.

Potential changes in labor laws or increased union recruiting activities could result in portions of our workforce being subjected to greater organized labor influence. Although we do not currently have any unionized employees, labor legislation could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results by imposing requirements that could potentially increase our costs, reduce our flexibility and impact our ability to service our customers. In addition, a labor dispute involving some or all of our employees could harm our reputation, disrupt our operations and reduce our revenues and resolution of disputes may increase our costs.

The loss of key personnel or difficulties recruiting and retaining qualified personnel could adversely affect our business and financial results.

13

Our success depends substantially on the contributions and abilities of key executives and other employees, and on our ability to recruit and retain high-quality employees to work in and manage our restaurants. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate management and other employees sufficient to maintain our current business and support our projected growth. A loss of key employees or a significant shortage of high-quality restaurant employees to maintain our current business and support our projected growth could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We occupy most of our restaurants and some of our food and beverage hospitality services locations under long-term non-cancelable leases under which we may remain obligated to perform even if we close those operations, and we may be unable to renew leases at the end of their terms.

Most of our restaurants and some of our food and beverage hospitality operations are located in premises that we lease. Many of our current leases are non-cancelable and typically have terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with renewal options for terms ranging from 1 to 5 years. We believe that future leases that we enter into will be on substantially similar terms. Fixed payments and/or minimum percentage rent payments under our operating leases and management agreements account for a significant portion of our operating expenses. This may increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, limit our ability to obtain additional financing, and limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business.

We primarily depend on cash flow from operations to pay our obligations and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities and sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from borrowings under our credit facility or other sources, we may not be able to meet our operating lease and management agreement obligations, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

If we were to close or fail to open a restaurant or other venue at a location we lease, we would generally remain committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, which could include, among other things, payment of the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Our obligation to continue making rental payments and fulfilling other lease obligations in respect of leases for closed or unopened restaurants could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Alternatively, at the end of the lease term and any renewal period for a restaurant, we may be unable to renew the lease without substantial additional cost, if at all. If we cannot renew such a lease we may be forced to close or relocate a restaurant, which could subject us to construction and other costs and risks.

14


Additionally, negative effects on our existing and potential landlords due to the inaccessibility of credit and other unfavorable economic factors may adversely affect our business and results of operations. If our landlords are unable to obtain financing or remain in good standing under their existing financing arrangements, they may be unable to provide construction contributions or satisfy other lease covenants to us. If any landlord files for bankruptcy protection, the landlord may be able to reject our lease in the bankruptcy proceedings. While we would under some circumstances have the option to retain our rights under the lease, we could not compel the landlord to perform any of its obligations and would be left with damages (which are subject to collectability risk) as our sole recourse. Our development of new locations may also be adversely affected by the negative financial situations of potential developers, landlords and host sites. Such parties may delay or cancel development projects or renovations of existing projects due to the instability in the credit markets and economic uncertainty. This could reduce the number of high-quality locations available that we would consider for our new operations or cause the quality of the sites in which the restaurants and food and beverage hospitality services operations are located to deteriorate. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our existing businesses or cause us to curtail new projects.

We depend upon frequent deliveries of food, alcohol and other supplies, which subjects us to the possible risks of shortages, interruptions and price fluctuations.

Our ability to maintain consistent quality throughout our locations depends in part upon our ability to acquire fresh, quality products, including beef, seafood, produce and related items, from reliable sources in accordance with our specifications. We currently purchase our food products from various suppliers. We have elected to purchase our beef from a limited number of suppliers. If there were any shortages, interruptions or significant price fluctuations in beef or seafood or if our suppliers were unable to perform adequately or fail to distribute products or supplies to our restaurants, or terminate or refuse to renew any contract with us, this could cause a short-term increase of our costs or cause us to remove certain items from our menu, increase the price of certain offerings or temporarily close a location, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In addition, we purchase beer, wine and spirits from distributors who own the exclusive rights to sell such alcoholic beverage products in the geographic areas in which our locations reside. Our continued ability to purchase certain brands of alcoholic beverages depends upon maintaining our relationships with those distributors, of which there can be no assurance. If any of our alcohol beverage distributors cease to supply us, we may be forced to offer brands of alcoholic beverage which have less consumer appeal or that do not match our brand image, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Increases in commodity prices would adversely affect our results of operations.

Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in commodity costs, which have a substantial effect on our total costs. The purchase of beef represents approximately 26% of our food and beverage costs. The market for beef is subject to extreme price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate conditions, the price of feed, industry demand, energy demand and other factors. Our ability to forecast and manage our commodities could significantly affect our gross margins. Energy prices can also affect our operating results, because increased energy prices may cause increased transportation costs for beef and other commodities and supplies, and increased costs for the utilities required to run each location. Historically we have passed increased commodity and other costs on to our customers by increasing the prices of our menu items. While we believe these price increases have historically not affected customer traffic, there can be no assurance that additional price increases would not affect future customer traffic. If prices increase in the future and we are unable to anticipate or mitigate these increases, or if there are shortages for beef, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Litigation and Brand Risk

We face the risk of adverse publicity in connection with our operations, including as a result of increased social media usage.

The quality of our food and our facilities are two of our competitive strengths. Therefore, adverse publicity, whether accurate or not, relating to food quality, public health concerns, illness, safety, injury or government or industry findings concerning our venues or those operated by others could negatively impact us. Any shifts in consumer preferences away

15


from the kinds of food we offer, particularly beef, whether because of dietary or health concerns or otherwise, would make our locations less appealing and could reduce customer traffic and/or impose practical limits on pricing.

The use of social media platforms allows individuals to access a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. Consumers value readily available information concerning goods and services that they have or plan to purchase and may act on such information without further investigation or authentication. Many social media platforms immediately publish content from their subscribers and participants, often without filters or checks on the accuracy of the content posted. Information concerning our company may be posted on such platforms at any time. If customers perceive or experience a reduction in our food quality, service or ambiance or in any way believe we have failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, this information can be immediately and broadly disseminated. This information may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may harm our performance, prospects or business.

We face the risk of litigation in connection with our operations.

We are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from our consumers alleging, among other things, illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. The inappropriate use of social media by our employees or customers could lead to litigation and result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation. In addition, third party and employee claims against us based on, among other things, alleged discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination, or labor code violations may divert financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit our future performance. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our operations. In addition, they may generate negative publicity, which could reduce customer traffic and sales. Although we maintain what we believe to be adequate levels of insurance commensurate with the nature and extent of our operations, insurance may not be available at all or in sufficient amounts to cover any liabilities with respect to these matters. A significant increase in the number of these claims or in the number of such claims that are successful could materially adversely affect our brand, financial condition or operating results. Like most employee practices liability insurance policies, our policy does not provide protection against hour and wage claims, and therefore litigation in the area could adversely impact our financial condition.

We may not be able to protect our brands, trademarks, service marks or other proprietary rights.

We have registered, or have applications pending to register, the trademarks STK, AsellinaKona Grill and Cucina AsellinaKonavore with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in certain foreign countries in connection with restaurant services. Our brands, which include our trademarks, service marks and other intellectual property and proprietary rights, are important to our success and our competitive position. In that regard, we believe that our trade names, trademarks and service marks are valuable assets that are critical to our success. Accordingly, we devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our brands. However, the actions we take may be inadequate to prevent imitation of our products and concepts by others, to prevent various challenges to our registrations or applications or denials of applications for the registration of trademarks, service marks and proprietary rights in the U.S. or other countries, or to prevent otherothers from claiming violations of their trademarks and proprietary marks. In addition, others may assert rights in our trademarks, service marks and other proprietary rights or may assert that we are infringing rights they have in their trademarks, service marks, patents or other proprietary rights. Any such disputes could force us to incur costs related to enforcing our rights. In addition, the use of trade names, trademarks or service marks similar to ours in some markets may keep us from entering those markets.

Each of our intellectual property marks is pledged as collateral securing our term loan agreementscredit and guaranty agreement with BankUnited, N.A.Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“BankUnited”Goldman Sachs”). Default under these agreements could enable BankUnitedGoldman Sachs to sell (at auction or otherwise) our trademarks, which would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue our business.

16


Other Risks

A regionalOur operations may be negatively impacted by seasonality, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters or global health pandemic could severelyacts of terror.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters that may at times affect the regions in which our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are located, regions that supply or produce food products for our restaurants, or locations of our distribution network. As a result of the seasonality of our business due to weather, holiday events and other factors, our quarterly results for any one quarter or fiscal year may not be indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.

In addition, if adverse weather conditions or natural disasters such as fires and hurricanes affect our business.

A health pandemic is a disease that spreads rapidlyrestaurants, we could experience closures, repair and widely by infectionrestoration costs, food spoilage, and affects many individuals in an areaother significant reopening costs, any of which would adversely affect our business. We could also experience shortages or populationdelayed shipments at the same time. If a regionalour restaurants if adverse weather or global health pandemic were to occur, depending upon its durationnatural disasters affect our distribution network, which could adversely affect our restaurants and severity, our business as a whole. Additionally, during periods of extreme temperatures (either hot or cold) or precipitation, we may experience a reduction in customer traffic, which could be severely affected. Customers might avoid public gathering places in the event of a health pandemic,adversely affect our restaurants and local, regional or national governments might limit or ban public gatherings to halt or delay the spread of disease. A regional or global pandemic might also adversely impact our business as a whole. Weather conditions are impossible to predict as is the negative impact on our business that such conditions might cause. Catastrophic weather conditions are likely to affect the supply of and costs for food products. If we do not anticipate or react to changing food costs by disruptingadjusting our purchasing practices or delaying productionmenu prices, our operating margins would likely deteriorate.

Terrorism, including cyber-terrorism or efforts to tamper with food supplies, could have an adverse impact on our brand and deliveryresults of products and materials in our supply chain and causing staff shortages in our restaurants. The impact of a health pandemic might be disproportionately greater on us than on other companies that depend less on the gathering of people in a communal atmosphere.operations.

TheSecurity breaches, loss of key personneldata and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business, prevent us from accessing critical information or difficulties recruiting and retaining qualified personnelexpose us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and financial results.our reputation

We utilize information technology systems and networks to process, transmit and store electronic information in connection with our business activities. As the use of digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication. These threats pose a risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, all of which are vital to our operations and business strategy. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing cyber-attacks or successfully mitigating their effects.

Our success depends substantially onWe estimate that approximately 75% of our sales are by credit or debit cards. Other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information has been stolen. We may in the contributionsfuture become subject to claims for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of credit or debit card information, and abilitieswe may also be subject to lawsuits or other proceedings relating to these types of key executivesincidents. Further, in 2015, the major credit card networks shifted the liability associated with EMV (Europay/Mastercard/Visa) chip card technology to the merchants. With this liability shift, any restaurant or merchant that is not using an approved chip-and-pin point-of-sale device would be liable for counterfeit or fraudulent charges.

Despite the implementation of security measures (such as the employment of internal resources and other employees,external consultants to conduct auditing and ontesting for weaknesses in our informational technology environment), our internal computer systems and those of our third-party contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage or disruption from hacking, computer viruses, software bugs, unauthorized access or disclosure, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication, equipment and electrical failures. There can be no assurance that we will promptly detect any such disruption or security breach, if at all. Unauthorized access, loss or dissemination could disrupt our operations, our ability to recruitprocess and retain high quality employees to work inprepare company financial information, and manage various general and administrative aspects of our restaurants. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate management and other employees sufficient to maintain our current business and support our projected growth. Abusiness. To the extent that any such disruption or security breach results in a loss of keyor damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure or theft of confidential, proprietary or personal information, we could incur liability, suffer reputational damage or poor financial performance or become the subject of regulatory actions by state, federal or non-US authorities, any of which could adversely affect our business.

17


We are subject to numerous and changing U.S. federal and foreign government regulations. Failure to comply with or substantial changes in government regulations could negatively affect our sales, increase our costs or result in fines or other penalties against us.

Each of our venues is subject to licensing and regulation by the health, sanitation, safety, labor, building environmental (including disposal, pollution, and the presence of hazardous substances) and fire agencies of the respective states, counties, cities, and municipalities in which it is located, as well as under federal law. These regulations govern the preparation and sale of food, the sale of alcoholic beverages, the sale and use of tobacco, zoning and building codes, land use and employee, health, sanitation and safety matters. Alcoholic beverage control regulations govern various aspects of our locations’ daily operations, including the minimum age of patrons and employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing and inventory control, handling and storage. Typically, our locations’ licenses to sell alcoholic beverages must be renewed annually and may be suspended or revoked at any time for cause. A failure to comply with one or more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of venues for an indeterminate period of time, or third-party litigation, any of which could have a significant shortagematerial adverse effect on us and our results of high qualityoperations.

Government regulation can also affect customer traffic at our locations. A number of states, counties and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant employeesoperators to maintaindisclose certain nutritional information. For example, the Affordable Care Act establishes a uniform, federal requirement for restaurant chains with 20 or more locations operating under the same trade name and offering substantially the same menus to post nutritional information on their menus, including the total number of calories. The law also requires such restaurants to provide to consumers, upon request, a written summary of detailed nutritional information, including total calories and calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, complex carbohydrates, sugars, dietary fiber, and total protein in each serving size or other unit of measure, for each standard menu item. The Food and Drug Administration is also permitted to require additional nutrient disclosures, such as trans-fat content. Our compliance with the Affordable Care Act or other similar laws to which we may become subject could reduce demand for our current businessmenu offerings, reduce customer traffic and/or reduce average revenue per customer, which would have an adverse effect on our revenue. Any reduction in customer traffic related to these or other government regulations could affect revenues and support our projected growth could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our foreign operations are subject to all of the same risks as our domestic restaurants and food and beverage hospitality services operations, and additional risks that include, among others, international economic and political conditions and the possibility of instability and unrest, differing cultures and consumer preferences, diverse government regulations and tax systems, the ability to source fresh ingredients and other commodities in a cost-effective manner and the availability of experienced management.

We are subject to governmental regulation in the domestic and international jurisdictions where we operate, including antitrust and tax requirements, anti-boycott regulations, import/export/customs regulations and other international trade regulations, the USA PATRIOT Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Any new regulatory or trade initiatives could impact our operations in certain countries. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial results.condition.

We may not be able to comply with certain debt covenants on our debt.

Our credit agreement requires us to achieve specified financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by events beyond our control, including the effects on our business of COVID-19 and related government actions and consumer behavior. If we were to default under our covenants and such default were not cured or waived, our indebtedness could become immediately due and payable. If we breach these covenants and fail to comply with the credit agreement, and the lenders accelerate the amounts outstanding, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

In addition, our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility depends on several factors, including compliance with specified leverage incurrence ratios. If we are not able to borrow under our revolving credit facility to

18


bridge losses we incur while our operations are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and if alternative financing is not available to us on acceptable terms or at all, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Failure of our internal controls over financial reporting could harm our business and financial results.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we would prevent or detect a misstatement of our financial statements or fraud. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and decline in the market price of our stock.

As disclosedWhile we have determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020, as indicated in Item 9A andour Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in the Company’sthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2016,we must continue to monitor and assess our internal control over financial reporting. If our management identifiedidentifies one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting relatedand such weakness remains uncorrected at fiscal year-end, we will be unable to a lack of anassert such internal control is effective financial statement close and reporting processat fiscal year-end. If we are unable to assess whether our consolidated financial statements are in compliance with GAAP, improper segregation of duties and other design gaps in our information technology environment, including the ability of accounting and finance employees who have custody over cash accounts to process and record transactions within our accounting system and an inadequate level of review of journal entries, including improper segregation of duties within our journal entry process. These material weaknesses were primarily due to an insufficient complement of finance and accounting resources within the organization. As a result of these material weaknesses, our management concludedassert that our internal control over financial reporting was notis effective for the year ended December 31, 2016 based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - An Integrated Framework issued in 2013. During 2017,at fiscal year-end, we initiated a formal remediation plan designed to address these material weaknesses, which we arecould lose investor confidence in the processaccuracy and completeness of implementing. As of December 31, 2017, management believes that these material weakness have not been remediated.

14

During 2018, management believes that its efforts will remediate the material weaknesses identified as of December 2017, but cannot, however, be certain that any measures we undertake will successfully remediate the material weaknesses or that additional material weaknesses will not be discovered in the future. If our remedial measures are insufficient to address these material weaknesses, or if other material weaknesses are discovered or occur in the future, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately or on a timely basis,reports, which could cause our reported financial results to be materially misstated and result in a loss of investor confidence or delisting and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We may need to secure additional financing to support our operations and fund growth.

We expect to rely on our cash flow from operations, tenant improvement allowances and other third-party financing to support our operations and growth. In the event our cash flow is insufficient to fund further expansion, we may need to secure additional funding, including but not limited to sales of additional shares of our capital stock and the incurrence of third party debt or equity to fund our growth. Our ability to obtain additional funding will be subject to various factors, including market conditions, our operating performance, investor appetite, lender and investor sentiment and our ability to incur additional debt in compliance with other contractual restrictions such as financial covenants under our existing credit facility or other debt documents. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of additional financings unattractive.

To the extent that we are dependent on additional financing consisting of debt, additional cash flow will be required to service such debt and will most likely contain further restrictive covenants limiting our financial and operational flexibility. Our ability to make these payments depends on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, many of which we cannot control. Additionally, our ability to raise capital and incur additional debt in the future could also delay or prevent a change in control of our company, make some transactions more difficult and impose additional financial or other covenants on us. In addition, any significant levels of indebtedness in the future could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that may have proportionately less debt and could make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse developments in our business. Our indebtedness and any inability to pay our debt obligations as they come due or inability to incur additional debt could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

If we raise additional funds through the sale of equity or convertible debt, our current stockholders’ percentage ownership will be reduced. We may have to issue securities that have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock.

There is no assurance that we will be successful in securing the additional capital we need to fund our business plan on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If future financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to fund our future needs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to comply with certain debt covenants or generate sufficient cash flow to make payments on our debt.

Our current credit agreements contain a number of significant restrictive covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things:

incur additional indebtedness or make amendments to indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions;
issue guarantees;
make investments;
use assets as security in other transactions or create any other liens;
sell assets or merge with or into other companies; and
make capital expenditures in excess of specified amounts.

Our credit agreements also require us to achieve specified financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by events beyond our control. If we were to default under our covenants and such default were not cured or waived, our indebtedness could become immediately due and payable, which could render us insolvent. If we breach these covenants and fail to comply with the credit agreements,reputation and the lenders accelerate the amounts outstanding,price of our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.common stock.

15

The recently passed comprehensive federal tax reform bill could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), which significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest and net operating loss carryforwards, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, and puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system. Our net deferred tax assets and liabilities have been revalued at the newly enacted U.S. corporate rate, and an estimate of impact has been recognized in our tax expense for 2017. We continue to examine the impact this tax reform legislation may have on our business. Due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of the TCJA, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) allows companies to record provisional estimates of the impacts of the TCJA during a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date. The Company will continue to assess the impact of the recently enacted tax law on its consolidated financial statements, the impact of which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Insiders have substantial control over us, and they could delay or prevent a change in our corporate control even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur.

Our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders hold a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly, these stockholders are able to control or have a significant impact on all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could delay or prevent an outside party from acquiring or merging with us even if our other stockholders affirmed such action. In addition, such concentrated control may adversely affect the price of our common stock and sales by our insiders or affiliates, along with any other market transactions, could affect the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is divided into three classes, each of which generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected each year. As a result, at a given annual meeting, only a minority of the Board may be considered for election. Since our staggered Board may prevent our stockholders from replacing a majority of our Board at any given annual meeting, it may entrench management and discourage unsolicited stockholder proposals that may be in the best interests of stockholders.

Moreover, our Board has the ability to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Under the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our Board may authorize and issue up to 10,000,000 shares of one or more series or class of preferred stock with rights superior to those of holders of common stock in terms of liquidation and dividend preference, voting and other rights. The issuance of preferred stock would reduce the relative rights of holders of common stock vis-à-vis the holders of preferred stock without the approval of the holders of common stock. In addition, to the extent that such preferred stock is convertible into shares of common stock, its issuance would result in a dilution of the percentage ownership of holders of common stock on a fully diluted basis. In addition, the issuance of a series of preferred stock could be used as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our company.

19


We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together, these provisions may make the removal orof management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve a payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

The price of our common stock could be subject to volatility related or unrelated to our operations.

The trading price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, including market perception of our ability to meet our growth projections and expectations, quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, trading value in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our business and the business of others in the industry. In addition, the stock market itself is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons related and unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

16

Item 2. Properties

We do not own any properties. Each of our “owned” locations operates in premises leased by its operating subsidiary or functionssubsidiary. We do not have a direct ownership interest in locations which are operated pursuant to a management agreement (“managed”) or license agreement (“licensed”) with one of our hospitality partners.

As of December 31, 2017, ourOur STK locations that we lease under operating lease agreements are as follows:

Venue Location Ownership Square Feet(1) Lease Expiration(2)
STK Atlanta Atlanta, GA 100.00%  12,000 12/31/2026
STK Chicago Chicago, Illinois 100.00%  9,300 9/30/2025
STK Denver Denver, Colorado 100.00%  7,000 6/30/2026
STK Downtown(3) New York City, NY 61.22%  24,000 4/30/2025
STK Miami Beach Miami Beach, FL 100.00%  11,400 10/31/2027
STK Midtown New York City, NY 100.00%  13,400 8/23/2031
STK Orlando(3) Orlando, Florida 100.00%  16,300 11/30/2030
STK San Diego(4) San Diego, California 100.00%  8,400 4/30/2026
STK Westwood(5) Los Angeles, California 100.00%  11,200 4/30/2025

Type of

Square

Lease or Agreement

Venue

Hotel/Casino

Location

Interest

Feet (1)

Expiration (2)

STK Atlanta

Atlanta, Georgia

Owned

12,000

12/31/2026

STK Chicago

Chicago, Illinois

Owned

9,300

9/30/2025

STK Denver

Denver, Colorado

Owned

7,000

6/30/2026

STK Doha

The Ritz-Carlton

Doha, Qatar

Licensed

7,000

1/31/2024

STK Downtown (3)

New York, New York

Owned (4)

24,000

4/30/2025

STK Dubai

Jumeirah Beach Residence

Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Licensed

10,000

12/4/2027

STK Ibiza

Ibiza Corso Hotel & Spa

Illes Balears, Spain

Licensed

13,330

12/31/2021

STK Las Vegas

The Cosmopolitan

Las Vegas, Nevada

Managed

10,000

1/28/2025

STK London

ME London

London, England

Managed

8,000

12/31/2022

STK Mexico City

Mexico City, Mexico

Licensed

5,000

8/31/2028

STK Miami Beach

Miami Beach, Florida

Owned

11,400

10/31/2027

STK Midtown

New York, New York

Owned

13,400

8/23/2031

STK Milan

ME Milan

Milan, Italy

Managed

7,200

5/11/2025

STK Nashville

Nashville, Tennessee

Owned

9,500

9/30/2029

STK Orlando (3)

Orlando, Florida

Owned

16,300

11/30/2030

STK San Diego (3)

Andaz Hotel

San Diego, California

Owned

8,400

4/30/2026

STK San Juan

Condado Vanderbilt Hotel

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Licensed

5,600

10/15/2029

STK Scottsdale (5)

Scottsdale, Arizona

Managed

10,100

11/7/2029

STK Toronto

Toronto, Canada

Managed

9,800

7/30/2030

STK Westwood

W Hotel

Los Angeles, California

Owned

5,000

4/30/2025

(1)Approximate
(2)LeaseLease/agreement expiration date is based on term of lease asterms specified in applicable operating leaseagreement for the current term without taking into account renewal options.
(3)Location includes an owned rooftop lounge, except for the STK Rooftop San Diego which is a licensed location.
(4)Ownership in location is 61.22%.
(5)STK Scottsdale, a managed location, had a management agreement in place as of December 31, 2020. STK Scottsdale opened in January 2021.

20


Our Kona Grill locations are as follows:

Type of

Square

Lease or Agreement

Venue

Hotel/Casino

Location

Interest

Feet (1)

Expiration (2)

Kona Grill Alpharetta

Alpharetta, Georgia

Owned

7,100

10/31/2024

Kona Grill Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland

Owned

7,000

3/31/2025

Kona Grill Boca Park

Las Vegas, Nevada

Owned

7,400

9/30/2023

Kona Grill Boise

Meridian, Idaho

Owned

7,200

10/31/2023

Kona Grill Carmel

Carmel, Indiana

Owned

7,500

1/31/2022

Kona Grill Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio

Owned

8,500

1/31/2026

Kona Grill Dallas

Dallas, Texas

Owned

6,900

12/31/2023

Kona Grill Denver

Denver, Colorado

Owned

7,200

7/31/2025

Kona Grill Eden Prairie

Eden Prairie, Minnesota

Owned

7,000

1/31/2028

Kona Grill El Paso

El Paso, Texas

Owned

7,000

6/30/2024

Kona Grill Gilbert

Gilbert, Arizona

Owned

6,800

4/30/2022

Kona Grill Huntsville

Huntsville, Alabama

Owned

7,000

10/31/2026

Kona Grill Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri

Owned

7,500

12/31/2027

Kona Grill Minnetonka

Minnetonka, Minnesota

Owned

7,200

4/30/2026

Kona Grill North Star

San Antonio, Texas

Owned

7,200

12/31/2026

Kona Grill Oak Brook

Oak Brook, Illinois

Owned

7,000

2/16/2022

Kona Grill Omaha

Omaha, Nebraska

Owned

7,800

12/31/2028

Kona Grill Plano

Plano, Texas

Owned

7,800

8/31/2025

Kona Grill San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas

Owned

7,200

9/30/2025

Kona Grill Sarasota

Sarasota, Florida

Owned

7,000

10/31/2024

Kona Grill Scottsdale

Scottsdale, Arizona

Owned

6,000

4/30/2024

Kona Grill Tampa

Tampa, Florida

Owned

7,500

12/31/2024

Kona Grill Troy

Troy, Michigan

Owned

7,000

3/31/2022

Kona Grill Woodbridge

Iselin, New Jersey

Owned

7,000

4/30/2029

(1)Approximate.
(2)Lease/agreement expiration date is based on terms specified in applicable agreement for the current term without taking into account renewal options.

Our ONE Hospitality brands and F&B services locations are as follows:

Type of

Square

Lease or Agreement

Venue

Hotel/Casino

Location

Interest

Feet (1)

Expiration (2)

ANGEL

Hotel Calimala

Florence, Italy

Managed

4,500

12/31/2024

F&B Services - Hippodrome

Hippodrome Casino

London, England

Managed

n/a

7/12/2022

F&B Services - ME London

ME London

London, England

Managed

n/a

12/31/2022

F&B Services - ME Milan

ME Milan

Milan, Italy

Managed

n/a

5/11/2025

F&B Services - W Hotel

W Hotel

Los Angeles, California

Owned

n/a

4/30/2025

Heliot

Hippodrome Casino

London, England

Managed

4,900

7/12/2022

Hideout

W Hotel

Los Angeles, California

Owned (3)

6,200

4/30/2025

Marconi

ME London

London, England

Managed

1,900

12/31/2022

Radio Rooftop Bar

ME London

London, England

Managed

5,500

12/31/2022

Radio Rooftop Bar

ME Milan

Milan, Italy

Managed

5,200

5/11/2025

(1)Approximate.
(2)Lease/agreement expiration date is based on terms specified in applicable agreement without taking into account renewal options.
(3)Includes rooftop lounge.
(4)Anticipated to open during second quarter of 2018. Lease currently in effect.
(5)In addition to our restaurant, we manage the poolhotel lounge bar and overall hospitality services for the attached hotel.square footage.

As of December 31, 2017, locations that we operate under management and licensing agreements, but in which we have no direct ownership interest, are:

VenueHotel/CasinoLocationSquare Feet(1)Management/License
Agreement Expiration(2)
STK DubaiJumeirah Beach ResidenceDubai, UAE10,00012/4/2027
STK IbizaIbiza Corso Hotel & SpaIlles Balears, Spain13,3007/18/2026
STK Las VegasThe CosmopolitanLas Vegas, NV10,0001/28/2020
STK LondonME LondonLondon, England8,00012/31/2022
STK MilanME MilanMilan, Italy7,2005/11/2025
STK Rooftop San DiegoAndaz HotelSan Diego, CA8,0004/30/2026
STK TorontoToronto, Canada9,8007/30/2030
HeliotHippodrome CasinoLondon, England4,9007/12/2022
Lola’s Underground CasinoHippodrome CasinoLondon, England3,5007/12/2022
MarconiME LondonLondon, England1,90012/31/2022
Radio Rooftop Bar (Lounge)ME LondonLondon, England5,50012/31/2022
Radio Rooftop Bar (Lounge)ME MilanMilan, Italy5,2005/11/2025

(1)Approximate
(2)Management/License agreement expiration date is based on original term as specified in applicable agreement without taking into account renewal options

In addition to the locations above, we leased office space for several support offices. We lease approximately 13,8004,700 square feet in New York City, New YorkDenver, Colorado for our corporate headquarters. Thisheadquarters, which expires in June 2024. We lease is set toadditional office space in New York, New York (2,200 square feet), Scottsdale, Arizona (2,200 square feet) and London, England (1,300 square feet). These leases expire in August 2021.2023, February 2025 and August 2024, respectively.

21


We also lease approximately 1,300 square feetTable of office space in London, England. The lease is set to expire in August 2018.Contents

17

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are subject to claims common to our industry and in the ordinary course of our business. Companies in our industry, including us, have been and are subject to class action lawsuits, primarily regarding compliance with labor laws and regulations. Defending lawsuits requires significant management attention and financial resources and the outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain. We believe that accrual for these matters are adequately provided for in our consolidated financial statements. We do not believe the ultimate resolutions of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. However, athe resolution of lawsuits is difficult to predict. A significant increase in the number of these claims, or one or more successful claims under which we incur greater liabilities than is currently anticipated, could materially and adversely affect our consolidated financial statements.

For information regarding material legal settlements that we made in 2017, seelitigation refer to Note 16. “Litigation”19. “Commitments and Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” For more information about the impact of legal proceedings in our business, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

18

22


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "STKS". The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock for each calendar quarter indicated:

 Common Stock 
 2017  2016 
 High  Low  High  Low 

Common Stock

2020

2019

    

High

    

Low

    

High

    

Low

First Quarter $2.29  $1.47  $3.24  $2.33 

$

4.68

$

0.73

$

3.36

  

$

2.85

Second Quarter  2.41   1.83   2.96   2.24 

 

2.48

 

1.00

 

4.00

 

2.86

Third Quarter  2.19   1.33   2.84   2.25 

 

2.35

 

1.25

 

3.44

 

2.56

Fourth Quarter 2.64  1.31  3.43  1.98 

$

3.75

$

1.97

$

3.48

  

$

2.40

Source: NASDAQ Capital Market                

Our public units and warrants, which expired on February 27, 2016, were traded on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbols “STKSU” and “STKSW”, respectively. The following table includes the high and low bids for these units and warrants for the period indicated:

  Units  Warrants 
  High  Low  High  Low 
1/1/2016 – 2/27/2016 $2.15  $1.10  $0.02  $0.0045 
Source: OTC IQ                

Source: NASDAQ Capital Market

Holders

As of April 6, 2018,February 28, 2021, we estimate that there were 9891 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

Although certain of our subsidiary limited liability companies ("LLCs") make distributions to members of our subsidiary LLCs, we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of our Board and will depend on our earnings, our capital requirements, compliance with debt covenants, overall financial condition and such other factors as the Board may consider. As a Delaware corporation, we are also limited by Delaware law as to the payment of dividends. We currently intend to retain our earnings if any, to finance our growth.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not required as we are a smaller reporting company.

19

23


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Business Summary

We are a global hospitality company that develops, owns and operates, manages and licenses upscale and polished casual, high-energy restaurants and lounges and provides turn-key food and beverage (“F&B&B”) services for hospitality venues including hotels, casinos and other high-end locations globally. locations. Turn-key F&B services are food and beverage services that can be scaled, customized and implemented by us for the client at a particular hospitality venue. Our vision is to be a global market leader in the hospitality industry by melding high-quality service, ambiance, high-energy and cuisine into one great experience that we refer to as “Vibe Dining”. We design all our restaurants, lounges and F&B services to create a social dining and high-energy entertainment experience within a destination location. We believe that this design and operating philosophy separates us from more traditional restaurant and foodservice competitors.

Our primary restaurant brands are STK, a multi-unit steakhouse concept that combines a high-energy, social atmosphere with the quality and service of a traditional upscale steakhouse, and Kona Grill, a polished casual bar-centric grill concept featuring American favorites, award-winning sushi, and specialty cocktails in a polished casual atmosphere. Our F&B hospitality management services include developing, managing and operating restaurants, bars, rooftop lounges, pools, banqueting and catering facilities, private dining rooms, room service and mini bars tailored to the specific needs of high-end hotels and casinos. Our F&B hospitality clients operate global hospitality brands such as the W Hotel, Hippodrome Casino, and ME Hotels.

We opened our first restaurant in January 2004 in New York, City and as of December 31, 2017, we owned, operatedNew York. We currently own, operate, manage or managed 31license 54 venues including 1420 STKs and 24 Kona Grills in major metropolitan cities in the United States,North America, Europe and the Middle East. In addition, we provided foodEast and beverage services10 F&B venues in five hotels and casinos one of which includes an owned restaurantin the United States and four of which are under separate management agreements. Our primary restaurant brand is STK,Europe. In January 2021, we opened a steakhouse concept that features a high-energy, fun environment that encourages social interaction. Our plans for near term growth include the opening of an ownedmanaged STK restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona. For those restaurants and venues that are managed or licensed, we generate management fees based on top-line revenues and incentive fee revenue based on a percentage of the location’s revenues and net profits.

The table below reflects our venues by restaurant brand and geographic location:

Venues

    

STK(1)(2)

    

Kona Grill

    

ONE Hospitality(3)

    

Total

Domestic

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Owned

 

10

 

24

 

2

 

36

Managed

 

2

 

 

 

2

Licensed

 

1

 

 

 

1

Total domestic

 

13

 

24

 

2

 

39

International

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Owned

 

 

 

 

Managed

 

3

 

 

8

 

11

Licensed

 

4

 

 

 

4

Total international

 

7

 

 

8

 

15

Total venues

 

20

 

24

 

10

 

54

(1)Locations with an STK and STK Rooftop are considered one venue location. This includes the STK Rooftop in San Diego, CA, which is a licensed location.
(2)Includes STK Scottsdale, a managed location, for which a management agreement was in place as of December 31, 2020. STK Scottsdale opened in January 2021.
(3)Includes concepts under the Company’s F&B hospitality management agreements and other venue brands such as ANGEL, Heliot, Hideout, Marconi and Radio.

24


COVID-19

The novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic has significantly impacted our business, and public concerns about the spread of COVID-19 continue to be widespread. We experienced a significant reduction in 2018. Our growthguest traffic at our restaurants as a result of restrictions mandated by state and local governments and temporarily closed several restaurants and shifted our operations to provide only take-out and delivery service. Starting in 2018 will continueMay 2020, state and local governments began easing restrictions on stay-at-home orders; however, certain states have reimposed restrictions as COVID-19 cases increased during the fall of 2020. Currently, all our domestic restaurants are open for outdoor dining or in-person dining with the openingseating capacity restrictions. Certain of our managed and licensed locations in Puerto Rico, Dubai, Qatarvenues internationally are temporarily closed or on to-go/delivery only due to COVID-19. We have taken significant steps to adapt our business to increase sales while providing a safe environment for guests and Mexico. The average unit volume, check average and beverage mix for STK restaurants that have been open a full 18 months at December 31, 2017 were $10.8 million, $110.39 and 37%, respectively.

employees.

In additionresponse to operating stand-alone restaurants,these conditions, and out of concern for our customers and partners, we operate turn-key F&B serviceshave implemented enhanced safety measures and sanitation procedures to allow for in-person dining at high-end hotelsour restaurants. As we navigate through the pandemic, we have also implemented measures to reduce our costs including the deferral of capital projects and casinos, which, in some cases, include upscale restaurants such as STK. Our diversified portfolionegotiations with suppliers and landlords regarding deferral or abatement of differentiated, high-energy F&B hospitality solutions provides landlords and ownerspayments.

Given the option of having one or several of our concepts and/or services in their venues. These locations are typically operated under our management agreements under which we earn a management fee based on revenue and an incentive fee based onongoing uncertainty surrounding the profitabilityeffects of the underlyingCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot reasonably predict when our restaurants will be able to return to normal dining room operations. We typically target foodexpect that our results of operations could be materially and beverage hospitality opportunities where we believe we can generate $500,000negatively affected by COVID-19 in 2021. Our resumption of normal dining operations is subject to $750,000events beyond our control, including the effectiveness of annual pre-tax income. We also owngovernmental efforts to halt the spread of COVID-19.

Executive Summary

Total revenue increased $21.3 million, or manage other standalone restaurants and lounges inside hotels and casinos.

Our loss from continuing operations before income taxes was $3.817.6% to $141.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020 compared to a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $6.0$120.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. The reduced loss from continuing operations before income taxesincrease is primarily due to a full year of Kona Grill revenue in 20172020 compared to 2016 is due to overall sales growth and profitability improvements from existing restaurants, new owned restaurants and managed and licensed locations combined with reductionsa partial period in pre-opening expenses2019 partially offset by increased settlement costs and higher interest expense.

Our net lossthe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our restaurants. Same-store sales decreased 27.9% for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $4.0 million2020 compared to the prior year as restaurants were temporarily closed or operated on a netlimited basis due to state and local seating capacity restrictions. Approximately $54.9 million of the increase in total revenue was attributable to the addition of the Kona Grill restaurants.

Operating income decreased $26.5 million to a loss of $16.5$13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. In2020 from $12.8 million for the year ended December 2016, we recorded a valuation allowance31, 2019. The decrease in operating income was primarily driven by temporary closures or seating capacity restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and COVID-19 related costs. We incurred $5.5 million of approximately $12.7 million against our deferred tax assets.

Stockholders’ equity transactions

In November 2017, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors pursuantcosts related to which we issued and soldCOVID-19 in a registered direct offering an aggregatethe year ended December 31, 2020, composed primarily of 1.75 million sharescosts for electrostatic cleaning of our common stock, atvenues, personal protective equipment, and sanitation supplies to prevent the spread of COVID-19; payments to employees for paid-time off during restaurant closures; rent and rent-related costs for closed and limited-operations restaurants from the day that the dining room closed; and inventory waste. In 2019, we recognized an offering price$11.0 million bargain purchase gain related to the Kona Grill acquisition and a non-cash write down of $1.50 per share for gross proceeds$2.7 million related to an investment. Additionally, we incurred transaction costs of approximately $2.6$1.1 million before deducting expensesand $2.5 million in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The transaction costs included transaction and integration costs incurred with the Kona Grill acquisition and internal costs associated with capital raising activities, primarily associated with the offering. InGoldman Sachs credit agreement and a concurrent private placement, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregatecredit agreement with Bank of 875,000 shares of common stock to the investors who participated in the registered direct offering.America, N.A.

Our Growth Strategies and Outlook

Our growth model is primarily comprised ofdriven by the following drivers:

following:

Expansion of STK.STK. We expect to continue to expand our operations domestically and internationally through a mix of owned, licensed and managed STK restaurants using a disciplined and targeted site selection process. We have identified over 3075 additional major metropolitan areas across the globe where we could grow our STK brand to 200 restaurants over the next several years.foreseeable future. We expect to open as many as threefive to five STK restaurantssix STKs annually, primarily through

25


management or licensing agreements, provided that we have sufficient interest from prospective licensees, acceptable locations and quality restaurant managers available to support that pace of growth.

In 2019, we opened an owned STK restaurant in Nashville, Tennessee and two licensed STK restaurants located in Doha, Qatar and San Juan, Puerto Rico. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, we have a management agreement in-place to open a managed STK restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona which opened in January 2021 and are under construction for an owned STK restaurant in Bellevue, Washington.

Expansion through New F&B Hospitality Projects.Projects. We expect our F&B hospitality services business to be an important driver of our growth and profitability, enabling us to generate management fee income with minimal capital expenditures. We believe that we are well positioned to leverage the strength of our brands and the relationships we have developed with global hospitality providers to drive the continued growth of our F&B hospitality projects, which traditionally have provided us with revenue through management and incentive revenue while requiring minimal capital expenditures from us.business. We continue to receive a large number ofinbound inquiries regarding new services at new hospitality venuesopportunities globally, and we continue to work with existing hospitality clients to identify and develop additional opportunities atin their venues. Going forward, weWe expect to target at leastenter into one to two new F&B hospitality projects every twelve months.

20

agreements annually. In 2019, we opened one managed rooftop bar concept, ANGEL, in Florence, Italy.

Increase Same Store Sales and Increase Our Operating Efficiency.Efficiency. In addition to expanding into new cities and hospitality venues, we intend to continue to increase revenue and profits in our existing operations and we believe that we have adequate capital and resources available to allocate towards operational initiatives. We expect same store sales to grow in 2018, at a mid-single digit pace. We also plan to improve operating margins by driving same store sales growth through continued focus on high-quality, high-margin food and beverage menu items. Furthermore,We believe that our operating margins will improve through growth in same store sales (“SSS”), as defined below in Key Performance Indicators, and a reduction of store-level operating expenses.

Acquisitions. On October 4, 2019, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Kona Grill, which is comprised of 24 domestic restaurants. We integrated Kona Grill by leveraging our corporate infrastructure, our bar-business knowledge and unique Vibe Dining program, to elevate the brand experience and drive improved performance.

As our footprint continues to increase in scale,increases, we expect to benefit by leveraging system-wide operating efficiencies and best practices through the management of our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of overall revenue. We will continue to look at opportunities to decrease our general and administrative expenses throughby outsourcing non-core activities and through increases in staff productivity.

Key Performance Indicators

We use the following key performance indicators in evaluating our restaurants and assessing our business:

Same Store Sales. SSS represents total food and beverage sales at domestic owned and managed restaurants opened for at least a full 18-month period, which removes the impact of new restaurant openings in comparing the operations of existing restaurants. For STK SSS, this measure includes total revenue from our owned and managed STK locations, excluding revenues from our owned STK restaurant located in the W Hotel in Los Angeles, California due to the impact of the F&B hospitality management agreement with the hotel. Revenues from locations where we do not directly control the event sales force are excluded from this measure.

Our comparable restaurant base for STK SSS consisted of nine domestic restaurants for the year ended December 31, 2020. For Kona Grill SSS all 24 domestic restaurants are included in the comparable restaurant base. STK and Kona Grill SSS decreased 34.2% and 21.4%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year.

Number of Restaurant Openings.Openings. Number of restaurant openings reflects the number of restaurants opened during a particular fiscal period. For each restaurant opening, we incur pre-opening costs, which are defined below. Typically, new restaurants open with an initial start-up period of higher than normalized sales volumes (also referred to in the restaurant industry as the “honeymoon” period), which decrease to a steady level approximately 18 to 24 months after opening. However, operating costs during this initial 18 month period are also higher than normal, resulting in restaurant operating margins that are generally lower during the start-up period of operation and increase to a steady level approximately 18 to 24 months after opening. Some new restaurants may experience a “honeymoon” period that is either shorter or longer than 18 months.this time frame.

26


In 2019, we opened an owned STK restaurant in Nashville, Tennessee, two licensed STK restaurants located in Doha, Qatar and San Juan, Puerto Rico, and a managed rooftop bar concept, ANGEL, in Florence, Italy. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, we have a management agreement in-place to open a managed STK restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona which opened in January 2021.

Average Check.Check. Average check is calculated by dividing total restaurant sales by total entrees sold for a given timespecified period. Our management team uses this indicator to analyze trends in customers’ preferences, customer expenditures and the overall effectiveness of menu changes and price increases.

For our comparable STK restaurants, our average check was $114 compared to $109 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The average check was $32 for Kona Grill restaurants for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $26 for the period from October 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019.

Average Comparable Unit VolumeRestaurant Revenue. Average comparable unit volumerestaurant revenue consists of the average sales of our comparable restaurants over a certain period of time. This measure is calculated by dividing total comparable restaurant sales in a given period by the total number of comparable restaurants in that period. This indicator assists management in measuring changes in customer traffic, pricing and development of our overall brand development.

Comparable Unit Sales. We consider a unit to bebrand. Our average comparable whether owned or managed, in the first full quarter following the 18th month of operation to remove the impact of new unit openings in comparing the operations of existing units. Changes in comparable unit sales reflect changes in sales for the comparable group of units over a specified period of time. Changes in comparable sales reflect changes in customer count trends as well as changes in average check, which reflects both menu mix shiftsSTK restaurant revenues were $6.9 million and menu pricing. Our comparable unit base consisted of six units$11.1 million for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2019, respectively. Our average comparable Kona Grill restaurant revenues was $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively.

2020 and $1.0 million for the period from October 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the average restaurant revenues for Kona Grill restaurants was $4.2 million.

Key Financial Terms and Metrics

We evaluate our business using a variety of key financial measures:

Segment reporting

We operateIn the fourth quarter of 2019, in three segments: “Owned restaurants”, “Owned food, beverageconjunction with the Kona Grill acquisition, we implemented certain organizational changes, including the reorganization of our internal reporting structure to better facilitate our strategy for growth, operational efficiency and other”, and “Managed and Licensed operations”. We believemanagement accountability. As a result of these to beorganizational changes, we identified our reportable operating segments as they do not have similar economic or other characteristics to be aggregated into a single reportable segment. Our Owned restaurant segment consists of leased restaurant locations and competes in the full-service dining industry. Our Owned food, beverage and other segment consists of operations that are hybrid in nature, such as where we have a leased restaurant location and also have a food and beverage agreement at the same location, typically a hotel, and our offsite banquet offerings. The primary component of this segment is our operations at the W Hotel in Beverly Hills, California. Our Managed and Licensed operations segment includes all operations for which a management, incentive or license fee is received. Management agreements generate management fees on net revenue and incentive fees on operating profit as defined in the applicable management agreement. License agreements generate revenue primarily through royalties earned on net revenue at each location. Revenues associated with developmental support for licensed locations are also included within this segment.follows:

STK. The STK segment consists of the results of operations from STK restaurant locations, competing in the full-service dining industry, as well as management, license and incentive fee revenue generated from the STK brand and operations of STK restaurant locations.
Kona Grill. The Kona Grill segment includes the results of operations of Kona Grill restaurant locations.
ONE Hospitality. The ONE Hospitality segment is comprised of the management, license and incentive fee revenue and results of operations generated from our other brands and venue concepts, which include ANGEL, Heliot, Hideout, Marconi, and Radio. Additionally, this segment includes the results of operations generated from F&B hospitality management agreements with hotels, casinos and other high-end locations.
Corporate. The Corporate segment consists of the following: general and administrative costs, stock-based compensation, acquisition related gains and losses, lease termination expenses, transaction costs, COVID-19 related expenses and other income and expenses. This segment also includes STK Meat Market, an e-commerce platform that offers signature steak cuts nationwide, our major off-site events group, which supports all brands and venue concepts, and revenue generated from gift card programs.

See Note 1917 to our consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our segment reporting.

21

Revenues

Owned restaurant net revenues. Owned restaurant net revenues consistsconsist of food and beverage sales by owned restaurants net of any discounts associated with each sale. In 2017,sale and of any ancillary F&B hospitality services at owned locations. Additionally, revenues from offsite banquets, our major off-site events group, and our gift card programs are included in owned restaurant net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2020, beverage sales comprised 34%25% of

27


food and beverage sales, before giving effect to any discounts, withand food sales comprisingcomprised the remaining 66%75%. This indicator assists management in understanding the trends in gross margins of the units.restaurants.

Owned food, beverage and other net revenue. Owned food, beverage and other net revenues include the sales generated by theOur primary owned restaurant brands are STK and Kona Grill. We specifically look at the locationcomparable sales from both owned and any ancillary F&B hospitality services at the same location. From time-to-time, offsite banquet opportunities arisemanaged restaurants to understand customer count trends and are reflected here.

changes in average check as it relates to our primary restaurant brands.

Management, license and incentive revenue.fee revenue. Management, license and incentive revenue includes: (1) managementfee revenues include fees received pursuant to management and license agreements. Management agreements that are calculatedtypically call for a management fee based on a fixedpercentage of revenue, a monthly marketing fee based on a percentage of revenues atand an incentive fee based on a managed venue’s net profits. Similarly, royalties from the managed orlicensee in license agreements are generally based on a percentage of the licensed location; (2)restaurant’s revenue. These management, license and incentive fees based on the operating profitability of a particular venue, as defined in each agreement, (3) development support fees earned upon the satisfaction of performance criteria which are recognized uponas revenue in the launch ofperiod the restaurant’s sales occur. Initial licensing fees and upfront fees related to management and license agreements are recognized as revenue on a new location; and (4) recognition of license fee revenues, which are recognizedstraight-line basis over the term of the license. agreement.

We evaluate the performance of our managed and licensed properties based on sales growth, a key driver for our management/royaltymanagement and license fees, and on improvements in operating profitability margins, which, combined with sales, drives incentive fee growth.

Our primary restaurant brand is STK and we specifically look at comparable revenues from both owned and managed STKs to understand customer count trends and changes in average check as it relates to our primary restaurant brand.

Cost and expenses

Owned restaurant cost of sales.sales. Owned restaurant cost of sales includes all owned restaurant food and beverage expenditures. We measure cost of goods as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues. Owned restaurant cost of sales are generally influenced by the cost of food and beverage items, menu mix, discounting activity and restaurant level controls. Purchases of beef represented approximately 33% and 30% of our food and beverage costs during 2017 and 2016, respectively. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Increases in commodity prices would adversely affect our results of operations.”

Owned restaurant operating expenses.expenses. We measure owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues. Owned restaurant operating expenses include the following:

Payroll and related expenses. Payroll and related expenses consists of manager salaries, hourly staff payroll and other payroll-related items, including taxes and fringe benefits. We measure our labor cost efficiency by tracking total labor costs as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues.

Occupancy. Occupancy comprises all occupancy costs, consisting of both fixed and variable portions of rent, deferred rent expense, which is a non-cash adjustment included in our Adjusted EBITDA calculation as defined below, common area maintenance charges, real estate property taxes, utilities and other related occupancy costs and is measured by considering both the fixed and variable components of certain occupancy expenses.

Direct operating expenses. Direct operating expenses consists of supplies, such as paper, smallwares, china, silverware and glassware, cleaning supplies and laundry, credit card fees and linen costs. Direct operating expenses are typically measured as a variable expense based on owned restaurant net revenues.

Outside services. Outside services includes music and entertainment costs, such as the use of live DJ’s, promoter costs, security services, outside cleaning services and commissions paid to event staff for banquet sales.

Repairs and maintenance. Repairs and maintenance consists of general repair work to maintain our facilities, as well as computer maintenance contracts. We expect these costs to increase as the facility gets older.

Marketing. Marketing includes the cost of promoting our brands and, at times, can include the cost of goods used specifically for complimentary purposes. Marketing costs will typically be higher during the first 18 months of a unit’s operations.

22Payroll and related expenses. Payroll and related expenses consist of manager salaries, hourly staff payroll and other payroll-related items, including taxes and fringe benefits. We measure our labor cost efficiency by tracking total labor costs as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues.
Occupancy. Occupancy comprises all occupancy costs, consisting of both fixed and variable portions of rent, deferred rent expense, which is a non-cash adjustment included in our Adjusted EBITDA calculation as defined below, common area maintenance charges, real estate property taxes, utilities and other related occupancy costs and is measured by considering both the fixed and variable components of certain occupancy expenses.
Direct operating expenses. Direct operating expenses consist of supplies, such as paper, smallwares, china, silverware and glassware, cleaning supplies and laundry, credit card fees and linen costs. Direct operating expenses are typically measured as a variable expense based on owned restaurant net revenues.
Outside services. Outside services include music and entertainment costs, such as the use of live DJ’s, promoter costs, security services, outside cleaning services and commissions paid to event staff for banquet sales.
Repairs and maintenance. Repairs and maintenance consists of general repair work to maintain our facilities, and computer maintenance contracts. We expect these costs to increase at each facility as they get older.
Marketing. Marketing includes the cost of promoting our brands and, at times, can include the cost of goods used specifically for complementary purposes. Marketing costs will typically be higher during the first 18 months of a restaurant’s operations.

General and administrative.administrative. General and administrative expenses are comprised of all corporate overhead expenses, including payroll and related benefits, stock-based compensation expense, professional fees, such as legal and accounting fees, insurance and travel expenses. Certain centrally managed general and administrative expenses are allocated specifically to unitsrestaurant locations and are reflected in owned restaurant operating expenses and include shared services such as reservations, events and marketing. We expect general and administrative expenses to be leveraged as we grow, become more efficient, and continue to focus on best practices and cost savings measures.

28


Depreciation and amortization.amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists principally of charges related to the depreciation of fixed assets including leasehold improvements, equipment and furniture and fixtures. As we support our growth initiatives with an increasing numberfixtures and the amortization of managed and licensed restaurant openings, depreciation and amortization is not expectedthe intangible assets related to increase significantly in the near future.

Kona Grill tradename.

Pre-opening expenses.expenses. Pre-opening expenses consist of costs incurred prior to opening an owned or managed STK unitrestaurant at either a leased or F&B location. Pre-opening expenseexpenses are comprised principally of manager salaries and relocation costs, employee payroll, training costs for new employees and lease costs incurred prior to opening. We expect theseminimal pre-opening costs to decrease as we focus our growth towards aour capital light model. Pre-opening expenses have varied from location to location depending on a number of factors, including the proximity of our existing restaurants; the amount of rent expensed during the construction and in-restaurant training periods; the size and physical layout of each location; the number of management and hourly employees required to operate each restaurant; the relative difficulty of the restaurant staffing process; the cost of travel and lodging for different metropolitan areas; the timing of the restaurant opening; and the extent of unexpected delays, if any, in obtaining necessary licenses and permits to open the restaurant.

Equity in (income) loss of subsidiaries. This represents the income or loss that we record under the equity method of accounting for entities that are not consolidated. Included in this amount is our ownership in Bagatelle New York for which we have effective ownership of approximately 51%, consisting of a 5.23% direct ownership interest by us and a 45.9% ownership interest through two of our subsidiaries. We also have a 10% effective ownership in One 29 Park, LLC (“One 29 Park”). One 29 Park operates a restaurant and manages the rooftop of a hotel located in New York, NY. Until the fourth quarter of 2017, we accounted for our investment in One 29 Park under the equity method of accounting based on our assessment that we had significant influence over One 29 Park’s operations. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the majority ownership of One 29 Park changed. As a result of this ownership change, we believe that we no longer have significant influence over the operations of One 29 Park and now account for our investment in One 29 Park under the cost method of accounting. In March 2018, we entered into an agreement to sell our 10% interest in One 29 Park to the new ownership group for $0.6 million.

Other Items

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.EBITDA. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are supplemental measures of financial performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP.accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We define EBITDA as net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash impairment loss, deferrednon-cash rent expense, pre-opening expenses, lease termination expenses, non-recurring gains and losses, stock-based compensation, COVID-19 related expenses and lossesresults from discontinued operations. Not all of the aforementioned items defining Adjusted EBITDA occur in each reporting period but have been included in our definitions of these terms based on our historical activity.

activity.

We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are more appropriate measures of our operating performance, asbecause they provide a clearer picture of our operating results by eliminating certaineliminate non-cash expenses that aredo not reflective of thereflect our underlying business performance. We use these metrics to facilitate a comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period, to analyze the factors and trends affecting our business and to evaluate the performance of our units.restaurants. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies; accordingly, you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key metricmeasure used by management. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry. We use Adjusted EBITDA, alongside other GAAP measures such as net income, (loss), to measure profitability, as a key profitability target in our budgets, and to compare our performance against that of peer companies despite possible differences in calculation.

Please refer to table on page 2832 for our reconciliation of net lossincome to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.

23

29


Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain statements of incomeoperations data for the periods indicated (in thousands):

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues:        
Owned restaurant net revenues $58,654  $54,068 
Owned food, beverage and other net revenues  10,227   9,880 
Total owned revenue  68,881   63,948 
Management, license and incentive fee revenues  10,779   8,466 
Total revenues  79,660   72,414 
         
Cost and expenses:        
Owned operating expenses:        
Owned restaurants:        
Owned restaurant cost of sales  15,544   13,781 
Owned restaurant operating expenses  37,076   34,542 
Total owned restaurant expenses  52,620   48,323 
Owned food, beverage and other expenses  9,400   8,805 
Total owned operating expenses  62,020   57,128 
General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense of $1,052 and $838, respectively)  11,893   11,172 
Settlements  1,245    
Depreciation and amortization  3,051   2,647 
Lease termination expense and asset write-offs  2,225   529 
Pre-opening expenses  1,595   5,994 
Transaction costs  421   1,293 
Equity in income of investee companies  (168)  (674)
Other expense (income), net  36   (46)
Total costs and expenses  82,318   78,043 
         
Operating loss  (2,658)  (5,629)
Other expenses, net:        
Derivative income     (100)
Interest expense, net of interest income  1,167   464 
Total other expenses, net  1,167   364 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes  (3,825)  (5,993)
Provision for income taxes  600   10,370 
         
Loss from continuing operations  (4,425)  (16,363)
         
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  397   (92)
         
Net loss  (4,028)  (16,455)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests  188   233 
Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $(4,216) $(16,688)

24

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Revenues:

 

  

 

  

Owned restaurant net revenue

$

136,618

$

108,775

Management, license and incentive fee revenue

 

5,325

 

11,906

Total revenues

 

141,943

 

120,681

Cost and expenses:

 

  

 

  

Owned operating expenses:

 

Owned restaurant cost of sales

 

34,024

 

28,005

Owned restaurant operating expenses

 

87,042

 

67,883

Total owned operating expenses

 

121,066

 

95,888

General and administrative (including stock-based compensation of $1,773 and $1,306 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively)

 

13,922

 

11,472

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,114

 

5,404

COVID-19 related expenses

 

5,492

 

Transaction costs

1,109

 

2,513

Lease termination expenses

 

3,315

 

573

Agreement restructuring expenses

 

452

 

Pre-opening expenses

 

178

 

565

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

(10,963)

Loss on impairment of investments

 

 

2,684

Other income, net

 

(11)

 

(246)

Total costs and expenses

 

155,637

 

107,890

Operating (loss) income

 

(13,694)

 

12,791

Other expenses, net:

 

  

 

  

Interest expense, net of interest income

 

5,329

 

1,954

Loss on early debt extinguishment

 

 

858

Total other expenses, net

 

5,329

 

2,812

(Loss) income before benefit for income taxes

 

(19,023)

 

9,979

Benefit for income taxes

 

(5,400)

 

(11,154)

Net (loss) income

 

(13,623)

 

21,133

Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

(798)

 

302

Net (loss) income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

(12,825)

$

20,831

30


The following table sets forth certain statements of incomeoperations data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:indicated. Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding.

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues:        
Owned restaurant net revenues  73.7%  74.7%
Owned food, beverage and other revenues  12.8%  13.6%
Total owned revenues  86.5%  88.3%
Management, license and incentive fee revenues  13.5%  11.7%
Total revenues  100.0%  100.0%
         
Cost and expenses:        
Owned operating expenses:        
Owned Restaurants:        
Owned restaurant cost of sales(1)  26.5%  25.5%
Owned restaurant operating expenses(1)  63.2%  63.9%
Total owned restaurant expenses(1)  89.7%  89.4%
Owned food, beverage and other expenses(2)  91.9%  89.1%
Total owned operating expenses(3)  90.0%  89.3%
         
General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense of 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively)  14.9%  15.4%
Settlements  1.6%  %
Depreciation and amortization  3.8%  3.7%
Lease termination expense and asset write-offs  2.8%  0.7%
Pre-opening expenses  2.0%  8.3%
Transaction costs  0.5%  1.8%
Equity in income of investee companies  (0.2)%  (0.9)%
Other expense (income)  %  (0.1)%
Total costs and expenses  103.3%  107.8 %
         
Operating loss  (3.3)%  (7.8)%
         
Other expenses, net:        
Derivative income  %  (0.1)%
Interest expense, net of interest income  1.5%  0.6 %
Total other expenses, net  1.5%  0.5%
         
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes  (4.8)%  (8.3)%
Provision for income taxes  0.8 %  14.3 %
Loss from continuing operations  (5.6)%  (22.6)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  0.5 %  (0.1)%
         
Net loss  (5.1)%  (22.7)%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests  0.2 %  0.3 %
Net loss attributable to The One Group Hospitality, Inc.  (5.3)%  (23.0)%

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

2019

Revenues:

  

Owned restaurant net revenue

 

96.2 %

90.1 %

Management, license and incentive fee revenue

 

3.8 %

9.9 %

Total revenues

 

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cost and expenses:

Owned operating expenses:

Owned restaurant cost of sales (1)

24.9 %

25.7 %

Owned restaurant operating expenses (1)

63.7 %

62.5 %

Total owned operating expenses (1)

88.6 %

88.2 %

General and administrative (including stock-based compensation of 1.2% and 1.1% for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively)

 

9.8 %

9.5 %

Depreciation and amortization

 

7.1 %

4.5 %

COVID-19 related expenses

 

3.9 %

—%

Transaction costs

0.8 %

2.1 %

Lease termination expenses

 

2.3 %

0.5 %

Agreement restructuring expenses

0.3 %

—%

Pre-opening expenses

 

0.1 %

0.5 %

Bargain purchase gain

 

—%

(9.1)%

Loss on impairment of investments

—%

2.2 %

Other income, net

 

—%

(0.2)%

Total costs and expenses

 

109.6 %

89.4 %

Operating (loss) income

 

(9.6)%

10.6 %

Other expenses, net:

 

Interest expense, net of interest income

 

3.8 %

1.6 %

Loss on early debt extinguishment

 

—%

0.7 %

Total other expenses, net

 

3.8 %

2.3 %

(Loss) income before benefit for income taxes

 

(13.4)%

8.3 %

Benefit for income taxes

(3.8)%

(9.2)%

Net (loss) income

 

(9.6)%

17.5 %

Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

(0.6)%

0.3 %

Net (loss) income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

 

(9.0)%

17.3 %


(1)These expenses are being shown as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues.revenue.

31


The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the periods indicated (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Net (loss) income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

(12,825)

$

20,831

Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

(798)

 

302

Net (loss) income

 

(13,623)

 

21,133

Interest expense, net of interest income

 

5,329

 

1,954

Benefit for income taxes

 

(5,400)

 

(11,154)

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,114

 

5,404

EBITDA

 

(3,580)

 

17,337

COVID-19 related expenses

5,492

Transaction and integration costs (1)

1,109

2,513

Stock-based compensation

1,773

1,306

Lease termination expense (2)

 

3,315

 

573

Agreement restructuring expense

 

452

 

Pre-opening expenses

 

178

 

565

Non-cash rent expense (3)

300

61

Bargain purchase gain

(10,963)

Loss on impairment of investments

2,684

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

858

Adjusted EBITDA

 

9,039

 

14,934

Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

(517)

 

646

Adjusted EBITDA attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

9,556

$

14,288


(1)Primarily transaction costs incurred with the Kona Grill acquisition and subsequent integration activities and internal costs associated with capital raising activities, most recently the Bank of America Credit Agreement, the Goldman Sachs Credit Agreement, and costs associated with the preparation of the Form S-8.
(2)These expensesLease termination expense are being shown as a percentage of owned food, beveragecosts associated with closed, abandoned and other net revenues.disputed locations or leases.
(3)TheseNon-cash rent expense is included in owned restaurant operating expenses are being shown as a percentageand general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of total owned revenue.income and comprehensive income.

25

The following tables show our operating results by segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):

  For the year ended December 31, 2017 
  Owned restaurants  Owned food, beverage and other  Managed and licensed operations  Total 
             
Revenues, net:                
Owned net revenues $58,654  $10,227  $  $68,881 
Management, license and incentive fee revenue        10,779   10,779 
Total revenue  58,654   10,227   10,779   79,660 
                 
Cost and expenses:                
Owned operating expenses:                
   Cost of sales  15,544         15,544 
   Other operating expenses  37,076         37,076 
   Owned F&B and other expenses     9,400      9,400 
Total owned operating expenses  52,620   9,400      62,020 
Segment income $6,034  $827  $10,779  $17,640 
                 
General and administrative              11,893 
Depreciation and amortization              3,051 
Interest expense, net of interest income              1,167 
Equity in income of investee companies              (168)
Other              5,522 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes             $(3,825)

. Prior year amounts have been revised to conform to the current year segment presentation.

    

STK

    

Kona Grill

    

ONE Hospitality

    

Corporate

    

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2020

Total revenues

 

$

60,932

 

$

78,591

 

$

1,197

 

$

1,223

$

141,943

Operating income (loss)(1)

6,523

3,356

(517)

(23,056)

(13,694)

Capital asset additions

$

2,734

$

1,952

$

206

$

895

$

5,787

As of December 31, 2020

Total assets

$

81,431

$

96,262

$

5,484

$

32,392

$

215,569

STK

    

Kona Grill

    

ONE Hospitality

    

Corporate

    

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2019

Total revenues

$

89,857

$

23,741

$

5,964

$

1,119

$

120,681

Operating income (loss)(2)

15,242

1,511

1,726

(5,688)

12,791

Capital asset additions

$

3,330

$

195

$

40

$

792

$

4,357

As of December 31, 2019

Total assets

$

82,691

$

93,829

$

8,252

$

21,813

$

206,585


(1)26Operating loss for the Corporate segment for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $5.5 million in COVID-19 related expenses.
(2)Operating loss for the Corporate segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes $11.0 million bargain purchase gain from the Kona Grill acquisition.

32


Table of Contents

  For the year ended December 31, 2016 
  Owned
restaurants
  Owned food,
beverage
and other
  Managed
and licensed
operations
  Total 
             
Revenues, net:                
Owned net revenues $54,068  $9,880  $  $63,948 
Management, license and incentive fee revenue        8,466   8,466 
Total revenue  54,068   9,880   8,466   72,414 
                 
Cost and expenses:                
Owned operating expenses:                
Cost of sales  13,781         13,781 
Other operating expenses  34,542         34,542 
Owned F&B and other expenses     8,805      8,805 
Total owned operating expenses  48,323   8,805      57,128 
Segment income $5,745  $1,075  $8,466  $15,286 
                 
General and administrative              11,172 
Depreciation and amortization              2,647 
Interest expense, net of interest income              464 
Equity in income of investee companies              (674)
Other              7,670 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes             $(5,993)

27

The following table presents a reconciliationResults of net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAOperations for the periods indicated (in thousands):

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $(4,216) $(16,688)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  188   233 
Net loss  (4,028)  (16,455)
Interest expense, net of interest income  

1,167

   464 
Provision for income taxes  600   10,370 
Depreciation and amortization  3,051   2,647 
EBITDA  

790

   (2,974)
Deferred rent(1)  (71)  (657)
Pre-opening expenses  1,595   5,994 
Lease termination expense and asset write-offs(2)  

2,225

   529 
Loss from discontinued operations  (397)  92 
Transaction costs(3)  421   1,293 
Derivative income     (100)
Stock based compensation  1,052   838 
Settlements  1,245    
Equity share of settlement costs  270    

Other nonrecurring charges

  332    
Adjusted EBITDA  7,462   5,015 
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interest  456   491 
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $7,006  $4,524 

(1) Deferred rent is included in owned restaurant operating expenses and general and administrative expense on the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

(2) Lease termination expense and asset write-offs is related to the costs associated with closed or abandoned locations.

(3) Transaction costs relate to the evaluation of strategic alternatives, liquidity improvement options and capital raising activities.

YearYears Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended2020 and December 31, 2016

2019

Revenues

Owned restaurant net revenues.revenue. Owned restaurant net revenuesrevenue increased $4.6$27.8 million, or 8.5%25.6%, from $54.1to $136.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $58.72020 from $108.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase2019. Approximately $78.6 million of the total revenue was primarily dueattributable to a full year of operations from STKthe Kona Grill restaurants in Orlando (opened in May 2016) and a near full year of sales from our Denver location (opened in January 2017), offsetting a decrease in sales from the closing of our Washington, D.C location in December 2016. Comparable unit sales increased +0.5% for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020 compared to $23.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2019. The increase is primarily duewas partially offset by temporary closures and limited in-person seating as a result of state and local mandates related to increasesthe COVID-19 pandemic. Same store sales decreased 27.9% in revenue at our two New York City restaurants.

the year ended December 31, 2020.

Owned food, beverageManagement, license and otherincentive fee revenue. Management and license fee revenues. Owned food, beverage and other revenues increased $0.3 decreased $6.6 million, or 3.5%55.3%, from $9.9to $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $10.22020 from $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue from off-site catering events.

Management and license fee revenue.2019. Management and license fee revenues increased $2.3 million, or 27.3%, from $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This was thedecreased primarily as a result of an increase in incentive fees generated bytemporary closures and limited in-person seating at our UK operationsmanaged and new licensing deals.

Revenue generated from the restaurants and lounges for which we operate under management or license agreements, and from F&B services at hospitality venues impacts the amount of management and incentive fees earned.

licensed locations due to COVID-19 prevention measures.

Cost and Expenses

Owned restaurant cost of sales.sales. Food and beverage costs for owned restaurants increased $1.8approximately $6.0 million, or 12.8%21.5%, from $13.8to $34.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $15.52020 from $28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This2019. Approximately $12.7 million of the increase in owned restaurant cost of sales was primarily dueattributable to a full year of operations at our ownedfor Kona Grill restaurants in Orlandothe year ended December 31, 2020 compared to a partial period in 2019. The increase in owned restaurant cost of sales is partially offset by the temporary closures and Denver.limited operations of our restaurants beginning in March 2020 as a result of COVID-19. As a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues, cost of sales increased from 25.5%decreased 80 basis points to 24.9% for the year ended December 31, 2016 to 26.5%2020 from 25.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in the percentage of food and beverage costs was driven by higher beef costs. Food revenues as a percentage of total food and beverage revenues were approximately 64% and 61% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Food cost as a percentage of food revenues are typically higher than beverage cost as a percentage of beverage revenues.

28

2019.

Owned restaurant operating expenses.expenses. Owned restaurant operating expenses increased $2.6$19.2 million, or 7.3%28.2%, from $34.5to $87.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $37.12020 from $67.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The2019. Approximately $36.6 million of the increase in owned restaurant operating expensesexpense was primarily dueattributable to a full year of operations at our owned restaurantsfor Kona Grill in Orlando and Denver. As a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues, owned restaurant operating expenses decreased 0.7% from 63.9% for the year ended December 31, 20162020 compared to 63.2% for the year ended December 31, 2017. This improvement wasa partial period in 2019. Beginning in March 2020, we reduced operating costs due to the leveragebusiness impact of comparable sales growthCOVID-19. As restaurant sale volumes increase with the resumption of in-person dining, restaurant operating costs are expected to increase.

General and a continued focus on laboradministrative. General and spending efficiency.

Owned food, beverage and other expenses. Owned food, beverage and other expensesadministrative costs increased $0.6$2.5 million, or 6.8%, from $8.821.4% to $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $9.42020 from $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase is primarily related to the expenses for off-site catering events.

General and administrative. General2019. As percentage of revenues, general and administrative costs were 9.8% in 2020 compared to 9.5% in 2019. We expect to leverage our general and administrative costs with the acquisition of Kona Grill along with implementing measures to reduce our costs while our operations are affected by COVID-19.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.7approximately $4.7 million or 6.5% from $11.2to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $11.92020 from $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The cost increase was due primarily related to an increasea full year of depreciation and amortization for the 24 Kona Grill restaurants acquired in bonus, payrollthe fourth quarter of 2019 and payrollthe opening of our owned STK restaurant in Nashville, Tennessee in March 2019.

Transaction and integration costs. In the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we incurred transaction and integration costs of $1.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively, related taxto the Kona Grill acquisition and costs associated with capital raising activities.

Lease termination expenses. Lease termination expense was approximately $3.3 million and $0.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Lease termination expenses are costs associated with closed, abandoned and disputed locations or disputed leases. In 2020, we accrued approximately $2.7 million for lease exit costs for restaurants never built and still under dispute with landlords.

33


Agreement restructuring. Agreement restructuring expense for the year ended December 31, 20162020 was $0.5 million, related to 14.9% forthe restructuring of agreements with our management and license partners.

COVID-19 related expenses. COVID-19 related expenses were $5.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 due in part2020 composed primarily of sanitation, supplies and safety precautions taken to prevent the leverage derived from increased revenue.spread of COVID-19 and payments to employees for paid time off during restaurant closures.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.4 million, or 15.3%, from $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase is primarily due to a full year of depreciation on capital assets at our STKs in Orlando and Denver.

Lease termination expense and asset write-offs.Lease termination expense and asset write-offs of approximately $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 are for charges we incurred for the development of future company-owned restaurants that we decided to not pursue further as we have decided to move forward with a capital light strategy. In 2017, the Company determined that it would not open venues in Austin and Dallas, Texas. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company has accrued for approximately $1.5 million of future lease payments, net of expected sublease income. These charges are included in lease termination expenses and asset write-offs on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. These charges are not specifically allocated to our reportable segments.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded charges of $0.5 million for charges related to the termination of the leases associated with STKs in Los Angeles, CA and Washington, D.C.

Pre-opening expenses.expenses. Pre-opening expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172020 were $1.6$0.2 million, comparedrelated to pre-openingour upcoming STK Bellevue restaurant. Pre-opening expenses of $6.0 million in the prior year. The decrease is due primarily to the development of fewer owned restaurants and limited pre-opening expenses for managed locations in the current period.

Transaction costs. Transaction costs were $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20172019 were $0.6 million related to the development of our owned STK restaurant in Nashville, Tennessee which opened in March 2019.

Bargain purchase gain. On October 4, 2019, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Kona Grill for a contractual price of $25.0 million plus approximately $1.5 million of consideration paid primarily for the apportionment of rent and $1.3utilities. We acquired approximately $37.5 million of assets, including $7.7 million in current liabilities, which resulted in a bargain purchase gain of approximately $11.0 million.

Loss on impairment of investments. On December 31, 2019, we determined that, because of the short term remaining on the lease (November 2020) and current market conditions, we were unable to recover the carrying amount of the investments in Bagatelle Investors and Bagatelle NY. As a result, we recorded a non-cash write down of $2.7 million related to our investments for the year ended December 31, 2016. Transaction costs2019. Upon expiration of the lease in November 2020, we exited our contract with Bagatelle. Refer to Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 included professional and other expenses related to the evaluation of strategic alternatives and capital raising activities. Transaction costs for the year ended December 31, 2016 included professional and other expenses related to several strategic alternatives.

Equity in income of investee companies. Equity in income of investee companies decreased by $0.5 million from $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and is primarily related to a decrease in income fromfurther information on our ownership interests in restaurants based in New York City.

nonconsolidated investments

Interest expense, net of interest income.income. Interest expense, net of interest income increased by $0.7was approximately $5.3 million from $0.5and $2.0 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016 to $1.2 million, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in interest is primarily due to additional interest accruing2020 and 2019, respectively.

Loss on $6.3 million of promissory notes thatearly debt extinguishment. On May 15, 2019, we entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America Credit Agreement”) and incurred approximately $0.4 million of debt issuance costs. In conjunction with entering into the Bank of America Credit Agreement, we prepaid the outstanding debt balances to early extinguish the $2.6 million of outstanding term loans with BankUnited, the $5.3 million of outstanding promissory notes with Anson Investments Master Fund LP, and the $1.0 million outstanding promissory note with 2235570 Ontario Limited. As a result, we recognized a $0.4 million loss on early debt extinguishment primarily caused by the recognition of the unamortized discounts related to warrants issued with the promissory notes and the recognition of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the debt extinguished. The Bank of America Credit Agreement was replaced with the Goldman Sachs credit agreement on October 4, 2019 in 2016 and an equipment financing agreement entered into in February 2017.conjunction with the Kona Grill acquisition. As a result, the unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.4 million was recognized as a loss on early debt extinguishment.

29

ProvisionBenefit for income taxes.taxes. The provisionbenefit for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 20172020 was $5.4 million compared to a tax expense of $0.6 million. The provisionbenefit for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 was a tax expense of $10.4 million. Our annual effective tax rate was -15.7% for the year ended December 31, 2107 and -173.0% for the year ended December 31, 2016. In 2016, we established a valuation allowance of $12.0 million on our deferred tax assets. Our 2017 taxes were impacted by the enactment of the TCJA in December 2017, which, amongst other things, reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Pursuant to the TCJA, we recorded the following adjustments to income tax expense during the fourth quarter of 2017:

·A one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings & profits amounted to $1.9 million. No tax liability was recorded due to the available net operating loss carryforwards. This resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction in valuation allowance of $0.8 million; and
·A reduction of net deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance of $2.9 million, primarily for the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets at the newly enacted tax rate of 21%.

Due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of the TCJA, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 allows companies to record provisional estimates of the impacts of the TCJA during a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date. In order to estimate the impact of the one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings, we used the retained earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as a proxy to calculate E&P for the 2017 tax provision. While retained earnings and E&P are two separate and distinct calculations, we believe that retained earnings can initially be used as a relatively accurate proxy for E&P. We believe that typical E&P adjustments for items such as depreciation, certain reserves and tax exempt income and other permanent nondeductible expenses for E&P are either immaterial or nonexistent. Therefore, in the absence of a formal E&P analysis, retained earnings was considered to be a reasonable estimate. As of December 31, 2017, the net retained earnings of our foreign subsidiaries was $1.9 million. We will conduct a comprehensive E&P analysis prior to the filing of our 2017 tax return. Only after the completion of the E&P study will we be able to determine with certainty the tax impact of the deemed repatriation provision of the TCJA. Any adjustment resulting from the E&P analysis will be included as a tax adjustment to continuing operations in 2018.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes. Prior to 2015, we decided to cease operations in six of our locations. Expenses for these operations are presented as loss from discontinued operations and represent the winding down of these operations. Income from discontinued operations was $0.4$11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20172019. Our effective tax rate was 28.4% and was the result of a $0.5 million sales tax settlement previously accrued(111.8)% for one of our discontinued operations offset by $0.1 million in miscellaneous expenses. Loss from discontinued operations was $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.

2019, respectively. Our effective tax rate differs from the statutory U.S. tax rate of 21% primarily due to the following: (i) tax credits for FICA taxes on certain employees’ tips (ii) taxes owed in foreign jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Italy; and, (iii) taxes owed in state and local jurisdictions. The CARES Act includes provisions allowing for the carryback of net operating losses generated for specific periods and technical amendments regarding the expensing of qualified improvement property. The CARES Act also allows for the deferral of the employer-paid portion of social security taxes, which the Company has elected to defer.

Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest. Net incomeloss attributable to noncontrolling interest was approximately $0.2increased by $1.1 million to ($0.8) million for each of the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and2020 compared to income of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

34


Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe that net cash provided by anticipated operating activities and construction allowances provided by landlords of certain locations will be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital, planned capital expenditures and debt service requirements for the next 12 to 18 months.

Executive Summary

Our principal liquidity requirements are to meet our lease obligations, our working capital and capital expenditure needs and to pay principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. Subject to our operating performance, which, if significantly adversely affected, would adversely affect the availability of funds, we expect to finance our operations for at least the next 12 months, followingincluding the issuance of the consolidated financial statements, including costs of opening currently planned new restaurants, through cash provided by operations and construction allowances provided by landlords of certain locations. We believe the combination of the aforementioned items are adequate to support our immediate business operations and plans.

We cannot be sure that these sources will be sufficient to finance our operations throughout this period and beyond, however, and we may seek additional financing in the future, which may or may not be available on terms and conditions satisfactory to us, or at all. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.5$24.4 million. We had $47.5 million in long-term debt, which consisted of our Credit Agreement and an equipment financing agreement, and $18.3 million in CARES Act Loans as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the availability on our revolving credit facility was $10.7 million, subject to the restrictions described in Note 8.

We expect thatIn the year ended December 31, 2020, our capital expenditures during fiscal 2018 will be significantly less than prior years since we planwere $5.8 million which were primarily used to open one new owned STK restaurant, in addition to our necessary restaurant-level maintenance and key initiative-related capital expenditures. We currently anticipate our totalfund capital expenditures for fiscal 2018, inclusiveat our existing restaurants and construction of all maintenance expenditures, to be approximately $3.0 million.

We expect to fund our anticipated capital expenditures for fiscal 2018 with current cash on hand, expected cash flows from operations and proceeds from expected tenant improvement allowances.STK Bellevue. Our future cash requirements will depend on many factors, including the pace of our expansion, conditions in the retail property development market, construction costs, the nature of the specific sites selected for new restaurants, and the nature of the specific leases and associated tenant improvement allowances available, if any, as negotiated with landlords.

Our Additionally, under our current capital light strategy, we plan is to primarily enter into management and license agreements for the operation of STKsfuture STK restaurants where we are not required to contribute significant capital upfront. We will depend on our expected cash flow from operations and continued financing to fund the majority of our planned capital expenditures for 2018.

30

Our operations have not required significant working capital, and, like many restaurant companies, we may at times have negative working capital.capital during the year. Revenues are received primarily in credit card or cash receipts, and restaurant operations do not require significant receivables or inventories, other than our wine inventory. In addition, we receive trade credit for the purchase of food, beverages and supplies, thereby reducing the need for incremental working capital to support growth.

In the event the Company needs to temporarily suspend all operations due to COVID-19 restrictions, the ongoing operating costs per month are expected to be as follows:

Cash Flows

Minimum rent

$

1,200

Insurance

 

200

Interest

400

Minimum general & administrative costs

 

500

Total

$

2,300

Credit Agreement

On October 4, 2019, in conjunction with the acquisition of Kona Grill, we entered into the Credit Agreement, which replaced the credit agreement with Bank of America and provides for a secured revolving credit facility of $12.0 million and a $48.0 million term loan. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments, with the final payment due in October 2024. The revolving credit facility also matures in October 2024.

On May 4, 2020, Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“GSB”), as administrative agent, collateral agent and lead arranger under the Credit Agreement, (1) consented to the CARES Act Loans described below and (2) agreed that the amount of the CARES Act Loans will not be counted toward the permitted amount of Consolidated Total Debt, as defined under the Credit Agreement, to the extent the amounts are retained as cash during the term of the CARES Act Loans in a segregated deposit account or used for purposes that are forgivable under the CARES Act, provided that the proceeds of the CARES Act Loans must be used only for “allowable uses” under the CARES Act (with at least 75% of the utilized proceeds to be used for purposes that result in the CARES Act Loans being eligible for forgiveness) or used for the repayment of the CARES Act Loans.

35


On May 8, 2020 and August 10, 2020, we amended the Credit Agreement with GSB to:

Eliminate testing of the fixed charge coverage ratio for the balance of 2020 and 2021;
For the purpose of testing, replace maximum “Leverage Ratio” with maximum “Net Leverage Ratio”. The maximum Net Leverage Ratio is (i) 2.85 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2020, (ii) 3.60 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2020, (iii) 3.10 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2021, (iv) 2.10 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021, and (v) 1.90 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021;
Reduce the maximum consolidated capital expenditures to $7,000,000 for 2020 and $7,000,000 for 2021; and
Require minimum “Consolidated Liquidity” of not less than $4,000,000 for the balance of 2020 and 2021 (from $1,500,000 for 2021).

As of December 31, 2020, we were compliant with the covenants required by the Credit Agreement. Based on current projections, we believe that we would continue to comply with the covenants in the Credit Agreement, as amended, throughout the twelve months following the issuance of the financial statements. Additionally, our consolidated adjusted EBITDA as defined by the Credit Agreement for determining covenant compliance includes pro forma adjustments for the annualization of the Kona Grill restaurant performance which includes results before the acquisition date.

See contractual obligations below and Note 8 and Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our long-term debt and commitments and contingencies.

CARES Act Loans

On May 4, 2020, two subsidiaries of the Company obtained CARES Act Loans from BBVA USA under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) created by the CARES Act. Repayment of the CARES Act Loans is guaranteed by the SBA. The ONE Group, LLC received a loan of $9.8 million related to the operations of STK restaurants, and Kona Grill Acquisition, LLC received a loan of $8.5 million related to the operation of Kona Grill restaurants.

The CARES Act Loans are scheduled to mature on April 28, 2022 and have a 1.00% interest rate and are subject to the terms and conditions applicable to PPP loans. Among other terms, BBVA USA may declare a default of the CARES Act Loans if the SBA disputes the validity of the guaranty of indebtedness, if a material adverse change occurs in our financial condition, or if BBVA USA believes the prospect of repayment of the CARES Act Loans or performance of obligations under the promissory notes is impaired. On an event of default, BBVA USA may declare principal and unpaid interest immediately due and payable, and it may charge default interest of 10%.

The following table summarizesCARES Act Loans are eligible for forgiveness if the statementproceeds are used for qualified purposes within a specified period and if at least 60% is spent on payroll costs. As of cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20172020, the Company has used all of the proceeds from the CARES Act Loans for qualified purposes in accordance with the CARES Act and SBA regulations, and these funds have supported the re-opening of in person dining and the return of approximately 3,000 furloughed employees to work. The Company applied for forgiveness of the CARES Act Loans in February 2021. The Company anticipates forgiveness of the entire amount of the CARES Act Loans; however, no assurance can be provided that the Company will obtain forgiveness of the CARES Act loans in whole or in part. Therefore, the Company has elected to classify the entire principal amount of the CARES Act Loans as debt on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):2020.

  Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Net cash provided by (used in):        
Operating activities $

5,987

  $2,102 
Investing activities  (4,334)  (10,091)
Financing activities  (938)  8,336 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (85)  (297)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $630  $50 

Operating ActivitiesCapital Expenditures and Lease Arrangements

Net cash generated by operating activities was $6.0 million forTo the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. We attribute a majority of thisextent we open new company-owned restaurants, we anticipate capital expenditures would increase to a $2.2 million year over year decrease in our pre-tax loss from continuing operations, primarily the result of lower preopening expenses due to less development and a reduction in transaction costs that were incurred for a 2016 evaluation of strategic alternatives, liquidity improvement options and capital raising activities. The remaining increase can be attributed to timing differences within our working capital accounts.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $4.3 million, consisting of purchases of property and equipment totaling $4.6 million primarily related to the construction of new restaurants andcompared to general capital expenditures of existing restaurants, partially offset by $0.3 million of proceeds received from our investments.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $10.1 million, consisting primarily of property and equipment purchases of $10.6 million primarily related to the construction of new restaurants and general capital expenditures at existing restaurants, partially offset by $0.5 million of proceeds received from our investments.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.9 million. We made third-party debt payments of $4.1 million and distributed $0.4 million of earnings to our non-controlling partners. These distributions were partially offset by $2.6 million in proceeds received from the sale of common stock and warrants in November 2017 and $1.0 million from a short term loan agreement.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $8.4 million. We received $3.9 million in proceeds from a shareholder rights offering, $1.2 million in proceeds from a related party trust agreement and $6.3 million in proceeds from third parties that we entered into promissory notes with. These proceeds were partially offset by third party debt payments of $2.7 million and distributions of $0.3 million to our non-controlling partners.

31

Capital Expenditures and Lease Arrangements

To the extent we open new restaurants, we anticipate capital expenditures in the future would increase from the amounts described in “Investing Activities” above.restaurants. Although we are committed to our capital light strategy, in which our capital investment is expected to be limited, we are willing to consider a variety of operating modelsopening owned restaurants as new opportunities present themselves. Wearise. For owned restaurants, we have typically targeted an average cash investment of approximately $3.8 million on average for a 10,000 square-foot STK restaurant, in each case net of landlord contributions and

36


equipment financing and excluding pre-opening costs. For locations where we may be the successor restaurant tenant, and currently our preference, total cash investment will be significantly less and in the $1.0 million to $1.5 million range. Typical pre-opening costs will be in the $0.3 million to $0.5 million range. In addition, some of our existing unitsrestaurants will require some capital improvements in the future to either maintain or improve the facilities. We are also looking at opportunities tomay add seating or provide enclosures for outdoor space in the next 12twelve months for some of our units.

locations, which we expect will increase revenues for those locations. As we continue to navigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company will evaluate the timing of opening new locations.

Our hospitality F&B services projects typically require limited capital investment from us. Capital expenditures for these projects will primarily be funded by cash flows from operations and equipment financing, depending upon the timing of these expenditures and cash availability.

We typically seek to lease our restaurant locations for periods of 10 to 20 years under operating lease arrangements, with a limited number of options for renewal.renewal options. Our rent structure varies, from lease to lease, but our leases generally provide for the payment of both minimum and contingent (percentage) rent based on sales, as well as other expenses related to the leases (for example,such as our pro-rata share of common area maintenance, property tax and insurance expenses).expenses. Many of our lease arrangements include the opportunity to secure tenant improvement allowances to partially offset the cost of developing and opening the related restaurants. Generally, landlords recover the cost of such allowances from increased minimum rents. However, there can be no assurance that such allowances will be available to us on each project that we select for development.

Cash Flows

Loan Agreements

AsThe following table summarizes the statement of cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017,2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

  

 

  

Operating activities

$

431

$

8,360

Investing activities

 

(5,787)

 

(30,397)

Financing activities

 

17,424

 

33,121

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(27)

 

(332)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

$

12,041

$

10,752

Operating Activities.Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to the net loss for the year ended December, 31 2020 as a result of the temporary closure and limited seating capacity at our long-term debt consistedrestaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic; including $5.5 million in costs directly attributable to COVID-19, and $1.1 million in transaction and integration expenses related to the Kona Grill acquisition.

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $5.8 million compared to $30.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Approximately $26.0 million of term loans, promissory notesthe net cash used in investing activities in 2019 related to Kona Grill acquisition related payments, net of cash acquired. The remaining net cash used in investing activities in 2020 and equipmentin 2019 was primarily related to the construction of new restaurants and general capital expenditures of existing restaurants.

Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing agreementsactivities was $17.4 million for which no additional financing was available.the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to $33.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. In 2017,May of 2020, we received $18.3 million in proceeds from the CARES Act Loans. In 2019, we received proceeds from the Goldman Sachs credit agreement and Bank of America Credit Agreement of $50.0 million and $14.8 million, respectively and we made principal payments of approximately $4.1$28.5 million towards our long-term debt. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $14.1debt, which included $22.5 million of gross outstandingearly debt to third parties.

Our term loan agreements with BankUnited contain certain affirmative and negative covenants, including negative covenants that limit or restrict, among other things, liens and encumbrances, indebtedness, mergers, asset sales, investments, assumptions and guaranties of indebtedness of other persons, change in nature of operations, changes in fiscal year and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The financial covenants in these agreements require us to maintain a certain adjusted tangible net worth and a debt service coverage ratio. We were in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the BankUnited term loan agreements as of December 31, 2017. Based on current projections, we believe that we will continue to comply with such covenants throughout 2018 (throughout the twelve months following the issuance of the financial statements).

See contractual obligations below and Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our long-term debt.

extinguishment payments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

37


Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172020 (in thousands):

  Total  Less than 1
year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than
5 years
 
Long-term debt obligations $14,063  $3,241  $4,465  $6,357  $ 
Expected interest payments(1)  2,688   937   1,436   315    
Operating leases  120,062   7,535   15,467   14,398   82,662 
Total $136,813  $11,713  $21,368  $21,070  $82,662 

Less than 1

More than 5

Total

year

1 - 3 years

3 - 5 years

 

years

Long-term debt obligations

$

47,508

$

588

$

960

$

45,960

$

Expected interest payments (1)

 

15,013

 

4,061

 

7,994

 

2,958

 

Standby letters of credit

337

90

179

68

Operating leases

 

177,723

 

13,276

 

26,760

 

24,820

 

112,867

Total

$

240,581

$

18,015

$

35,893

$

73,806

$

112,867


(1)Represents estimated future cash interest payments using our weighted-average debt balance andbased on borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2020 at the expected interest rate at December 31, 2017.over the period outstanding.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SeeRefer to Note 2 toof our consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed description of recent accounting pronouncements. The adopted accounting guidance discussed in Note 2 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. With the exception of new lease accounting guidance, for which we are still evaluating the financial statement impact of, we expect that the accounting guidance not yet adopted will not have a significant impact to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

32

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, net sales and operating expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that ourOur critical accounting policies and estimates require us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about mattersjudgements that are inherently uncertain.

could have a material impact on our financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements set forthstatements.

Business Combinations

On October 4, 2019, we acquired substantially all the assets of Kona Grill, which was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Standard Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations. Acquired assets and assumed liabilities were assigned fair values based on widely accepted valuation techniques, in Item 8accordance with Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The process for estimating fair values in many cases requires the use of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.significant estimates, assumptions and judgments, including determining the timing and estimates of future cash flows and developing appropriate discount rates. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies.

Income Taxes

We recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the respective tax bases of our assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using current enacted rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect the temporary differences to reverse. We routinely evaluate the likelihood of realizing the benefit of our deferred tax assets and may record a valuation allowance if, based on all available evidence, we determine that some portion of the tax benefit will not be realized.

In addition, our income tax returns are periodically audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. These audits include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions taken and the allocation of income amongst various tax jurisdictions. We evaluate our exposures associated with our various tax filing

38


positions and record a related liability. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provision in the period in which an uncertain tax provision is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we have recorded areleased approximately $10.3 million of the valuation allowance based on an assessment of $11.6 million onthe realizability of our deferred tax assets. We have also recordedAs of December 31, 2020, the remaining valuation allowance of $0.3 million relates to foreign tax credits we do not expect to utilize as a liability for unrecognizedresult of generating income in a jurisdiction with a higher income tax benefits of $0.7 million. rate than the U.S. The recording of these amounts requiredeferred taxes requires significant management judgment regarding the interpretation of applicable statutes, the status of various income tax audits, and our particular facts and circumstances. We believe that our estimates are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from these results.

Our 2017 taxes wereare impacted by the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Job Act in December 2017 (the “TCJA”), which, amongst other things, reducedenacted global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) which does not allow us to defer the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Pursuant to the TCJA, we recorded the following adjustments to income tax expense during the fourth quarter of 2017:

·A one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings & profits amounted to $1.9 million. No tax liability was recorded due to the available net operating loss carryforwards. This resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction in valuation allowance of $0.8 million; and
·A reduction of net deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance of $2.9 million, primarily for the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets at the newly enacted tax rate of 21%.

Due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of the TCJA, SAB 118 allows companies to record provisional estimates of the impacts of the TCJA during a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date. In order to estimate the impact of the one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings, we used the retained earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as a proxy to calculate E&P for the 2017 tax provision. While retained earningsU.K. and E&P are two separate and distinct calculations, we believe that retained earnings can initially be used as a relatively accurate proxy for E&P. We believe that typical E&P adjustments for items such as depreciation, certain reserves and tax exempt income and other permanent nondeductible expenses for E&P are either immaterial or nonexistent. Therefore, in the absence of a formal E&P analysis, retained earnings was considered to be a reasonable estimate. As of December 31, 2017, the net retained earnings of our foreign subsidiaries was $1.9 million. We will conduct a comprehensive E&P analysis prior to the filing of our 2017 tax return. Only after the completion of the E&P study will we be able to determine with certainty the tax impact of the deemed repatriation provision of the TCJA. Any adjustment resulting from the E&P analysis will be included as a tax adjustment to continuing operations in 2018.Italy subsidiaries.

33

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Disposal of Property and Equipment

We evaluate long-livedLong-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be fully recoverable. ForThe impairment evaluation is generally performed at the purpose of reviewing restaurant assets for indicators of potential impairment, we use an individual restaurants assets and liabilities,venue asset group level, as we believe this is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. We believe that historical cash flows, in addition to other relevant facts and circumstances, are the primary basis for estimating future cash flows. Relevant facts and circumstances include, but are not limited to,among others, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends. Recoverability of restaurant assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an individual restaurant’s assets to the estimated identifiable undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by those restaurant assets. This process requires the use of estimates and assumptions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. If the carrying amount of an individual restaurant’s assets exceeds its estimated, identifiable, undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset’s exceedasset exceeds its fair value. Generally,Fair value is determined by discounting a restaurant’s identifiable future cash flows are discounted to estimate its fair value.

flows.

From time to time, we have decided to close or dispose of restaurants. Typically, such decisions are made based on operating performance or strategic considerations and must be made before the actual costs or proceeds of disposition are known, and management must make estimates of these outcomes. Such outcomes could include the sale of a leasehold, mitigating costs through a tenant or subtenant, or negotiating a buyout of a remaining lease term. In these instances, management evaluates possible outcomes, frequently using outside real estate and legal advice, and records provisions for the effect of such outcomes. The accuracy of such provisions can vary materially from original estimates, and management regularly monitors the adequacy of the provisions until final disposition occurs.

Based upon our testing, we recorded impairments of $0.6 million and $0.1 million forFor the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.2019, we did not identify any event or changes in circumstances that indicated that the carrying values of our restaurant assets were impaired.

Leases

LeasesContracts are evaluated to determine whether they contain a lease at inception, and leases are classified as either operating or financing. For operating leases, we have recognized a lease liability equal to the present value of the remaining lease payments, and a right of use asset equal to the lease liability, subject to certain adjustments, such as prepaid rents, initial direct costs and lease incentives received from the lessor. For leases that do not have a rate implicit in the lease, we used our incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments. Our incremental borrowing rate is the rate of interest that we would have to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term on an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment.

The lease term at the lease commencement date is determined based on the non-cancellable period for which we have the right to use the underlying asset, together with any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if we are reasonably certain to exercise that option, periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if we are reasonably

39


certain not to exercise that option, and periods covered by an option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease in which the exercise of the option is controlled by the lessor.

Certain of our leases also provide for percentage rent, which are variable lease costs determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess of specified, minimum sales targets. These percentage rents are recognized as rent expense prior to the achievement of the specified sales target provided achievement of the sales target is considered probable.

We currently lease all of our restaurant locations under leases classified as operating leases. Minimum base rent for our operating leases, which generally have escalating rentals over the term of the lease, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As such, an equal amount of rent expense is attributed to each period during the term of the lease regardless of when actual payments occur. Lease terms begin on the date we take possession under the lease and include cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. The difference between rent expense and actual cash payments is classified as deferred rent in our consolidated balance sheets.

Certain of our leases also provide for contingent rent, which is determined as a percentage of sales in excess of specified minimum sales levels. We recognize contingent rent expense prior to the achievement of the specified sales target that triggers the contingent rent, provided achievement of the sales target is considered probable.

Management makes judgments regarding the probable term for each restaurant property lease whichand considers a number of factors to evaluate whether renewal options in the lease contracts are reasonably certain of exercise, such as length of time before option exercise, expected value of the leased asset at the end of the initial lease term, importance of the lease to overall operations, costs to negotiate a new lease, and any contractual or economic penalties. The lease term can impact the lease classification and accounting for a lease as capitaleither an operating or operating;financing lease, the incremental borrowing, the rent holidays and/or escalations in payments that are taken into consideration when calculating straight-line rent; incremental borrowing rates;the rent expense and the related lease liability and right-of-use asset, and the term over which leasehold improvements for each restaurant are amortized.depreciated. These judgments may produce materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization and rent expense and materially different lease liabilities and right-of-use assets than would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used.

Stock-Based Compensation

We used the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of our option awards. The Black-Scholes model requires estimates of the expected term of the option, as well asthe risk-free interest rate, future volatility and the risk-free interest rate. Our stock options generally vest over a period of 5 years and generally have contractual terms to exercise of 10 years.dividend yield. The expected term of options is based upon evaluations of historical and expected future exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected term at the grant date. Implied volatility is based on a peer group average.Company’s assumptions are as follows:

Expected Term. The expected term of options is based upon evaluations of historical and expected future exercise behavior with consideration of both the vesting period and contractual terms of the instruments.
Risk Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected term at the grant date.
Implied Volatility. Implied volatility is based upon an average of the volatilities of an industry peer group who are publicly traded.
Dividend Yield. The Company has historically not paid dividends and does not plan to do so in the foreseeable future.

There is a risk that our estimates of the fair values of our share-based compensation awards on the grant dates may differ from the actual values realized upon the exercise, expiration, early termination or forfeiture of those share-based payments in the future. Certain share-based payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly in excess of the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. Although the fair value of our share-based awards areis determined in accordance with GAAP, the value calculated may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

34

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk for our restaurants operating in the United Kingdom, Italy, Canada, Mexico and the Middle East. If foreign currency exchange rates depreciate in these countries or regions, or any other country or region in which we may operate in the future, we may experience declines in our international operating results but such exposure would not be material to the consolidated financial statements. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge foreign currency exchange rate changes.

40


Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices, these fluctuations can materially impact our food and beverage costs. While we have taken steps to qualify multiple suppliers who meet our standards as suppliers for our restaurants and enter into agreements with suppliers for some of the commodities used in our restaurant operations, we do not enter into long-term agreements for the purchase of such supplies. There can be no assurance that future supplies and costs for such commodities will not fluctuate due to weather and other market conditions outside of our control and we may be subject to unforeseen supply and cost fluctuations. Dairy costs can also fluctuate due to government regulation. Because we typically set our menu prices in advance of our food product prices, our menu prices cannot immediately take into account the changing costs of food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our customers through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. We do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices at this time.

Inflation

Over the past several years, inflation has not significantly affected our operations. However, the impact of inflation on labor, food and occupancy costs could, in the future, significantly affect our operations. We pay many of our employees hourly rates related to the applicable federal or state minimum wage. Food costs as a percentage of revenues have been somewhat stable due to procurement efficiencies and menu price adjustments, although no assurance can be made that our procurement will continue to be efficient or that we will be able to raise menu prices in the future. Costs for construction, taxes, repairs, maintenance and insurance all impact our occupancy costs. We believe that our current strategy, which is to seek to maintain operating margins through a combination of menu price increases, cost controls, careful evaluation of property and equipment needs, and efficient purchasing practices, has been an effective tool for dealing with inflation. There can be no assurance, however, that future inflationary or other cost pressure will be effectively offset by this strategy.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our Consolidated Financial Statements required by this Item are set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We are required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as our controls are designed to do, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the risk and cost benefit relationship related to controls and procedures.

35

In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of December 31, 2017,2020, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation and as described below under “Management’s Assessment on Internal

41


Control Over Financial Reporting,” we have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Due to these material weaknesses, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2017. These conclusions were communicated to the Audit Committee. Notwithstanding the existence of the material weaknesses described below, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods and dates presented.

2020.

Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (the “COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, our CEO and CFO concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on the criteria set forth by COSO in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013).

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses we identified and the proposed remedial actions are described below. These material weaknesses were disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and have not been fully remediated as of December 31, 2017.

Lack of a robust and effective financial statement close and reporting process to assess whether our consolidated financial statements are in compliance with U.S. GAAP, including the lack of review by competent and qualified personnel where such reviews are designed and operating at a level of precision that can detect errors. We also identified ineffective controls over the accounting for income taxes arising from the lack of review and reconciliation of our income tax accounts. We initiated a process in which our monthly reporting of the financial results of all business units is presented to management after a thorough analysis and review of the business units’ financial information. In addition, a comprehensive financial statement close and reporting checklist is currently under development. This checklist, which we expect to fully implement in 2018, requires qualified accounting and finance personnel to perform a timely and detailed review of account balances, disclosures, transactions and their related reconciliation schedules and other pertinent support for all business units. We will also initiate a process which involves a more robust review of our tax provision, including the reconciliation of our income tax accounts.

Improper segregation of duties and other design gaps in our information technology (“IT”) environment and journal entry process. We have begun to remove certain super user rights from most accounting and finance department staff. In addition, certain user profiles within the accounting software have been modified to eliminate the ability of most staff to record and process transactions and we also limited access to checks and bank accounts. Finally, an additional level of review for journal entries, cash receipts and disbursement transactions has also been put in place.

Notwithstanding the material weaknesses described above, our management believes that our consolidated financial statements included in this report are fairly stated, in all material respects, in accordance with GAAP. However, if not remediated, these material weaknesses could result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We are in the process of implementing our continued remediation plan, and expect the material weaknesses to be remediated during 2018. However, we are unable to estimate the cost of the remediation or when the remediation will be completed.

Management believes the foregoing efforts will effectively remediate the material weaknesses. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, management may determine to take additional measures to address the material weaknesses or determine to modify the remediation plan described above. We cannot assure you, however, when we will remediate such material weaknesses, nor can we be certain of whether additional actions will be required or the costs of any such actions.

36

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the period covered by this report2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

For the quarter and year ended December 31, 2017, we revised our reportable segments based on how our new Chief Executive Officer views our company’s business. Our quarterly results for 2016 and 2017 based on the new segment presentation are as follows (in thousands):

THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED

  3/31/2016  6/30/2016  9/30/2016  12/31/2016 
Revenues:                
Owned restaurant net revenues $11,365  $13,229  $13,827  $15,647 
Other food, beverage and other net revenues  3,015   2,054   2,491   2,320 
Total owned revenue  

14,380

   15,283   16,318   17,967 
Management, license and incentive fee revenue  2,014   1,944   2,061   2,447 
Total revenues  16,394   17,227   18,379   20,414 
                 
Cost and expenses:                
Owned operating expenses:                
Owned restaurants:                
Owned restaurant cost of sales  2,838   3,351   3,573   4,019 
Owned restaurant operating expenses  7,558   8,089   9,075   9,820 
Total owned restaurant expenses  10,396   11,440   12,648   13,839 
Owned food, beverage and other expenses  2,381   1,848   2,378   2,198 
Total owned operating expenses  12,777   13,288   15,026   16,037 
                 
General and administrative  2,684   2,813   2,682   2,993 
Settlements            
Depreciation and amortization  523   547   758   819 
Lease termination and asset write-offs           529 
Pre-opening expenses  900   1,546   2,035   1,513 
Transaction costs        505   788 
Equity in income of investee companies  (83)  (231)  (178)  (182)
Other expense (income), net  225   62   (160)  (173)
Total costs and expenses  17,026   18,025   20,668   22,324 
                 
Loss from operations  (632)  (798)  (2,289)  (1,910)
                 
Other expenses:                
Derivative income  (100)         
Interest expense, net of interest income  98   99   80   187 
                 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes  (630)  (897)  (2,369)  (2,097)
Provision for income taxes  (66)  546   (4,047)  13,937 
(Loss) income from continuing operations  (564)  (1,443)  1,678   (16,034)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  2      (1)  (93)
Net (loss) income $(562) $(1,443) $1,677  $(16,127)
Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (105)  117   200   21 
Net (loss) income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $(457) $(1,560) $1,477  $(16,148)

37

42


Table of Contents

THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED

  3/31/2017  6/30/2017  9/30/2017  12/31/2017 
Revenues:                
Owned restaurant net revenues $14,228  $14,683  $13,189  $16,554 
Owned food, beverage and other net revenues  3,885   2,431   2,144   1,767 
Total owned revenue  18,113   17,114   15,333   18,321 
Management, license and incentive fee revenue  2,314   2,784   2,479   3,202 
Total revenues  20,427   19,898   17,812   21,523 
                 
Cost and expenses:                
Owned operating expenses:                
Owned restaurants:                
Owned restaurant cost of sales  3,876   3,838   3,436   4,394 
Owned restaurant operating expenses  9,369   9,408   8,911   9,388 
Total owned restaurant expenses  13,245   13,246   12,347   13,782 
Owned food, beverage and other expenses  2,937   2,315   2,044   2,104 
Total owned operating expenses  16,182   15,561   14,391   15,886 
                 
General and administrative  2,921   3,291   2,267   3,414 
Settlements     795   500   (50)
Depreciation and amortization  866   805   950   430 
Lease termination expense and asset write-offs  273   208   402   1,342 
Pre-opening expenses  470   722   94   309 
Transaction costs     254      167 
Equity in (income) loss of investee companies  (45)  153   (264)  (12)
Other expense (income), net  12   (130)  (19)  173 
Total costs and expenses  20,679   21,659   18,321   21,659 
                 
Loss from operations  (252)  (1,761)  (509)  (136)
                 
Other expenses:                
Derivative income            
Interest expense, net of interest income  259   220   325   363 
                 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes  (511)  (1,981)  (834)  (499)
Provision for income taxes  (17)  203   179   235 
Loss from continuing operations  (494)  (2,184)  (1,013)  (734)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (106)        503 
Net loss $(600) $(2,184) $(1,013) $(231)
Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (198)  116   153   117 
Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $(402) $(2,300) $(1,166) $(348)

38

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that our businessInformation required by this item is to be managedincorporated by or underreference from the direction of our Board of Directors (the “Board”). Our Board is divided into three classesCompany’s Proxy Statement for purposes of election. One class is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders to serve for a three-year term. We currently have six directors sitting on the Board, classified into three classes as follows: (1) Eugene M. Bullis and Kin Chan constitute a class with a term ending at the 2018 annual meeting; (2) Jonathan Segal and Emanuel Hilario constitute a class with a term ending at the 2019 annual meeting; and (3) Michael Serruya and Dimitrios Angelis constitute a class with a term ending at the 2020 annual meeting. Nicholas Giannuzzi, a former director, resigned from his position as a member of the Board on November 16, 2017, prior to the expiration of his term ending at the 2018 annual meeting. Kin Chan joined as a member of the Board on November 17, 2017 and Dimitrios Angelis joined as a member of the Board on March 28, 2018.

On November 15, 2017, we entered into an agreement (the “Board Agreement”) with Argyle Street Management Limited (“ASM”), who, along with certain affiliates, was an investor in our November 2017 offering, pursuant to which we agreed that ASM shall have the right to designate one member to our Board, who initially is Mr. Kin Chan, for so long as ASM and its affiliates beneficially own at least 750,000 shares of Common Stock.

On March 23, 2018, we entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) with David Kanen and Kanen Wealth Management LLC (collectively, the “Kanen Group”) regarding the composition of our Board. Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement, subject to certain conditions, we and the Kanen Group agreed that, provided that the Kanen Group beneficially owns at least 10% of our outstanding common stock, the Kanen Group shall have the right to designate one member to the Board as a Class I director with a term expiring in 2020. Effective March 28, 2018, pursuant to the Letter Agreement, the Board appointed Dimitrios Angelis as a Class I director with a term expiring at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.

On March 22, 2018, our Board accepted the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee and voted to nominate Eugene Bullis and Kin Chan for election at the annual meeting for a term of three years to serve until the 2021 annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholders, and until their successors have been elected and qualified, subject, however, to such directors’ respective earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.Stockholders.

Set forth below are the names of the persons nominated as directors and directors whose terms do not expire this year, their ages, their offices in the Company, if any, their principal occupations or employment for at least the past five years, the length of their tenure as directors and the names of other public companies in which such persons hold or have held directorships during the past five years. Additionally, information about the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to our Board’s conclusion at the time of filing of this report that each person listed below should serve as a director is set forth below:

NameAgePositions
Emanuel Hilario50President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jonathan Segal57Director of Business Development and Executive Chairman
Michael Serruya53Director
Kin Chan51Director
Eugene Bullis72Director
Dimitrios Angelis48Director

Our Board has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc., either directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, our Board has determined that the following members of the Board are “independent directors” as defined by The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”): Michael Serruya, Eugene M. Bullis, Kin Chan and Dimitrios Angelis.

39

Emanuel P.N. Hilario — President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Emanuel P.N. Hilario, age 50, has served as a Class III member of our Board since April 10, 2017. Mr. Hilario has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since October 30, 2017. Since 2015, Mr. Hilario has served as Chief Financial Officer of Sizzling Platter, a restaurant management company operating over 400 franchised restaurants in the United States, Mexico, and China under the brand names of Red Robin, Sizzler, Little Caesars, Dunkin Donuts, and Wingstop. Before joining Sizzling Platter, Mr. Hilario served as Chief Operating Officer for Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. from 2013 to 2014 and served as its Chief Financial Officer from 2010 to 2013. He previously served as Chief Financial Officer for McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurants, Inc. from April 2004 through May 2009 and also served on its Board as a Director from May 2007 to July 2009. For the preceding four years, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc. While there, from 2002 to 2004, he managed day-to-day operations of the Angelo and Maxie’s steakhouse concept. Mr. Hilario began his career at McDonald’s and has held various financial roles within the company. He received a Bachelor of Science and Commerce degree from Santa Clara University in 1990.

Director Qualifications:   We believe Mr. Hilario’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive knowledge and experience in the restaurant industry and as an executive in public companies, his knowledge of licensing and franchising of restaurants, as well as his years of working at fine dining concepts and managing food and beverage hospitality operations.

Jonathan Segal — Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director of Business Development

Jonathan Segal, age 57, has served as a Class III member of our Board since October 16, 2013. Mr. Segal brings over 35 years of experience in developing and operating hotels, bars and hospitality projects to the Company. Mr. Segal served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2004 until October 30, 2017. He co-founded the Company in 2004 in order to open ONE, a pioneering restaurant in the Meatpacking District of New York. Mr. Segal began his career in the hospitality industry at age 16 with his family’s company, currently known as The Modern Group in Jersey, Channel Islands, U.K., formerly the largest leisure company in the Channel Islands. In June 2013, Jonathan won an Ernst &Young Entrepreneur of the Year 2013 New York award and was a finalist for the national award in November 2013. 

Director Qualifications:   We believe Mr. Segal’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his role as founder and former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, his extensive knowledge and experience in the restaurant industry and his leadership, strategic guidance and operational vision.

Michael Serruya — Director

Michael Serruya, age 53, has served as Class I member of our Board since October 27, 2013 and as a Non-Executive Chairman of our Board from October 27, 2013 until October 30, 2017. Mr. Serruya has served as a director of Second Cup Inc. since 2017. Mr. Serruya was also President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of CoolBrands’ predecessor, Yogen Früz World-Wide Inc. Mr. Serruya was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Kahala Brands until July 2016 and is currently Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Serruya Private Equity.

Director Qualifications:   We believe Mr. Serruya’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his business experience, including a diversified background as an executive and in operational roles in both public and private companies, and as a board member of several public companies, gives him a breadth of knowledge and valuable understanding of our business.

Eugene M. Bullis — Director

Eugene M. Bullis, age 72, has served as a Class II member of our Board since August 12, 2014. Mr. Bullis has served as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. from May 2013 to May 2016, and has served as a Member of the Board of Governors of The Doctors Company since December 2010. From November 2015 to November 2016, Mr. Bullis served as the Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., where he held the same position from 2007 until retirement in 2010. Prior to joining The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Mr. Bullis served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conseco, Inc. from May 2002 to May 2007. Previously, Mr. Bullis served in a number of senior financial officer roles primarily in technology-related businesses, including Chief Financial Officer of Wang Laboratories, Inc. Mr. Bullis began his career with a predecessor firm of what is now Ernst & Young LLP, where he advanced to audit partner. Mr. Bullis received an A.B. in Business Administration from Colby College in 1967. 

Director Qualifications:   We believe Mr. Bullis’ qualifications to serve on the Board include his considerable financial experience, including his background in audit and his familiarity with compliance, finance and regulatory requirements, as well as his experience as an executive in both public and private companies and as a board member of public companies.

40

Kin Chan – Director

Kin Chan, age 51, has served as a member of our Board since November 2017. Mr. Chan has been the Chief Investment Officer of Argyle Street Management Limited since 2002. He has been a non-executive director OUE Limited since March 2010 and has served as a member of its Audit Committee since October 2011. Mr. Chan has also been the chairman of TIH Limited, a company listed on the Singapore Exchange Limited and has been appointed as a non-executive director of CITIC Resources Holdings Limited, a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited since March 2017. He was a non-executive director of (i) United Fiber System Limited (now known as Golden Energy and Resources Limited), a company listed on the Singapore Exchange Limited from 2011 to 2015; (ii) Asia Resource Minerals Plc, a company formerly listed on the London Stock Exchange for the period from July 2015 to August 2015; and (iii) Mount Gibson Iron Limited, a company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange from September 2016 to January 2018. Mr. Chan earned an AB degree from Princeton University and a Master's degree in Business Administration from the Wharton School of University of Pennsylvania where he was a Palmer Scholar.

Director Qualifications:   We believe Mr. Chan’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive international business experience and strong relationships with the hospitality industry, including a background as an executive and as a board member of several public companies, gives him a breadth of knowledge and valuable understanding of our business. In addition, he is independent and has the requisite experience, background and financial sophistication to serve as a member of the Audit Committee.

Dimitrios Angelis – Director

Dimitrios Angelis, age 48, has served as a Class I member of our Board since March 28, 2018. Mr. Angelis has been the Principal at Life Sciences Legal since October 2015, serving as outside general counsel on all legal matters to several biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical device companies. Before joining Life Sciences Legal, Mr. Angelis was on the Board of Directors of OTI Inc. (NASDAQ: OTIV) from December 2012 to August 2015, including having served as Chairman of the Board for most of the time during that period. Mr. Angelis was also CEO of OTI America, Inc. from January 2014 to August 2015. Prior to his business leadership role at On Track Innovations, he served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Wockhardt, Inc. from October 2012 to December 2013, Senior Counsel at Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. from October 2008 to October 2012, and Chief Legal Officer at Osteotech, Inc. from February to October 2008. Mr. Angelis was formerly a director at Actavis Inc. from August 2004 to November 2007. He began his career at Mayer, Brown, LLP as a Corporate Associate. Mr. Angelis currently serves as a director of Digirad Corporation (NASDAQ: DRAD) and AmeriHoldings (NASDAQ: AMRH). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Boston College, a Master of Arts from California State University, and a Juris Doctorate from New York University School of Law.

Director Qualifications:   We believe Mr. Angelis’ qualifications to serve on the Board include his 15 years of legal and corporate governance experience, including his background and experience as an executive and board member of several public companies.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meetings

Meeting Attendance.   During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 the Board met a total of 16 times, and the various committees of the Board met a total of 11 times. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of committees of the Board on which he or she served during fiscal 2017. The Board has adopted a policy under which each member of the Board is strongly encouraged but not required to attend each annual meeting of our stockholders.

Audit Committee.   Our Audit Committee met four times during fiscal 2017. This committee currently has three members, Messrs. Bullis (Chairman), Serruya and Chan. Our Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Audit Committee’s written charter and include the authority to retain and terminate the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews annual financial statements, considers matters relating to accounting policy and internal controls and reviews the scope of annual audits. All members of the Audit Committee satisfy the current independence standards promulgated by the SEC and by NASDAQ, as such standards apply specifically to members of audit committees. The Board has determined that Mr. Bullis is an “audit committee financial expert,” as the SEC has defined that term in Item 407 of Regulation S-K.

41

Compensation Committee.   Our Compensation Committee met three times during fiscal 2017. This committee currently has two members, Messrs. Bullis and Serruya. Our Compensation. Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Compensation Committee’s written charter and includes reviewing, approving and making recommendations regarding our compensation policies, practices and procedures to ensure that legal and fiduciary responsibilities of the Board are carried out and that such policies, practices and procedures contribute to our success. Our Compensation Committee also administers our 2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the determination of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, and shall conduct its decision making process with respect to that issue without the Chief Executive Officer present. All members of the Compensation Committee qualify as independent under the definition promulgated by NASDAQ.

In establishing compensation amounts for executives, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation that is competitive in light of current market conditions and industry practices. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee will annually review market data which is comprised of proxy-disclosed data from peer companies and information from nationally recognized published surveys for the restaurant industry, adjusted for size. The market data helps the committee gain perspective on the compensation levels and practices at the peer companies and to assess the relative competitiveness of the compensation paid to the Company’s executives. The market data thus guides the Compensation Committee in its efforts to set executive compensation levels and program targets at competitive levels for comparable roles in the marketplace. The Compensation Committee then takes into account other factors, such as the importance of each executive officer’s role to the Company, individual expertise, experience, and performance, retention concerns and relevant compensation trends in the marketplace, in making its final compensation determinations.

The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant during fiscal year 2017 was Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“Cook & Co.”). Cook & Co. was previously engaged by, and reported directly to, the Compensation Committee, which has the sole authority to hire or fire Cook & Co. and to approve fee arrangements for work performed. Cook & Co. assisted the Compensation Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities under its charter, including advising on equity incentive compensation grants to employees, including officers. The Compensation Committee authorized Cook & Co. to interact with management on behalf of the Compensation Committee, as needed in connection with advising the Compensation Committee, and Cook & Co. was included in discussions with management.

It is the Compensation Committee’s policy that the Chair of the Compensation Committee or the full Compensation Committee pre-approve any additional services provided to management by an independent compensation consultant.

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of each named executive officer in light of the above factors and determines whether the named executive officer should receive any increase in base salary or receive a discretionary equity award based on such evaluation. During fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee did not adhere to a formula or other quantitative measures with respect to compensation but rather relied on qualitative and subjective evaluations to determine the appropriate levels of compensation for our named executives.  

Nominating and Governance Committee.   Our Nominating and Governance Committee met four times during fiscal 2017 and currently has two members, Messrs. Serruya (Chairman), and Bullis. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Nominating and Governance Committee’s written charter and include evaluating and making recommendations to the full Board as to the size and composition of the Board and its committees, evaluating and making recommendations as to potential candidates, and evaluating current Board members’ performance. All members of the Nominating and Governance Committee qualify as independent under the definition promulgated by NASDAQ.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board consists of six members.

In accordance with the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual general meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. The authorized number of directors may be changed by resolution of the Board. Vacancies on the Board can be filled by resolution or a majority vote of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director of the Board. Our principles of corporate governance give the Board the authority to choose whether the roles of Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are held by one person or two people. Our principles also give the Board the authority to change this policy if it deems it best for the Company at any time. Currently, two separate individuals serve in the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company.

42

Our management is principally responsible for defining the various risks facing the Company, formulating risk management policies and procedures, and managing our risk exposures on a day-to-day basis. The Boards’ principal responsibility in this area is to ensure that sufficient resources, with appropriate technical and managerial skills, are provided throughout the Company to identify, assess and facilitate processes and practices to address material risk and to monitor our risk management processes by informing itself concerning our material risks and evaluating whether management has reasonable controls in place to address the material risks. The involvement of the Board in reviewing our business strategy is an integral aspect of the Boards’ assessment of management’s tolerance for risk and also its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for the Company.

While the full Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight, the Board may elect to delegate oversight responsibility related to certain risks committees, which in turn would then report on the matters discussed at the committee level to the full Board. For instance, an audit committee could focus on the material risks facing the Company, including operational, market, credit, liquidity and legal risks and a compensation committee could be charged with reviewing and discussing with management whether our compensation arrangements are consistent with effective controls and sound risk management.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers who are not also directors. We have employment agreements with Jonathan Segal and Emanuel Hilario. Celeste Fierro is an at-will employee.

NameAgePositions
Linda Siluk61Interim Chief Financial Officer
Celeste Fierro50Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Events

Linda Siluk — Interim Chief Financial Officer

Linda Siluk, age 61, has served as the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 16, 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Siluk served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for Fairway Group Holdings, Corp. (“Fairway”) from June 2015 to February 2017, as the Vice President and Finance and Chief Accounting Officer from October 2011 to June 2015, and as Senior Project Manager from August 2009 to October 2010. Prior to her experience at Fairway, Ms. Siluk served as the Chief Financial Officer at Drug Fair from October 2008 to May 2009. From September 2006 to April 2008, Ms. Siluk was the Senior Vice President, Finance at Ann Taylor. Ms. Siluk received her B.S. in Business Administration from Montclair State College. Ms. Siluk is a certified public accountant.

Celeste Fierro — Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Events

Celeste Fierro, age 50, has served as Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Events of the Company since February 19, 2014. Prior to that time and since 2004, Ms. Fierro served as Senior Vice President of Operations, and in such capacity oversaw all operations of the Company. Ms. Fierro was a founding partner of the Company in 2004 along with Mr. Segal. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Fierro was an event planner in New York City and founded Cititaste Events, a company which planned events for clients and events such as the Annual All-Star Games of Major League Baseball, the National Football League, the Pro-Bowl, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and American Express.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in the ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Such persons are required to furnish us copies of all Section 16(a) filings.

Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to us, our records reflect that all reports which were required to be filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, were filed on a timely basis, except that three reports covering one transaction were filed late by Eugene Bullis, Nicholas Giannuzzi and Michael Serruya.

CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS

We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our chief executive officer and chief financial and accounting officer. The text of the code of conduct and ethics is posted on our website at www.togrp.com which does not form a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Disclosure regarding any amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of the code of conduct and ethics that apply to our directors, principal executive and financial officers will be included in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver, unless website posting or the issuance of a press release of such amendments or waivers is then permitted by the rules of NASDAQ.

43

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued during the last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 to (i) our President and Chief Executive Officer; (ii) our former President and Chief Executive Officer whoInformation required by this item is now serving as our Director of Business Development and (iii) our next two most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 during the fiscal year ended 2017 and were serving as executive officers as of such date.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position Year Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards(1)
  Option
Awards(2)
  Total 
Emanuel Hilario(3)                      
President and Chief Executive Officer 2017 $70,701  $4,777  $426,000  $156,000  $657,478 
Jonathan Segal(4)
Director of Business Development
 2017 $548,846  $32,813  $  $  $581,659 
Former Chief Executive Officer 2016 $575,000  $  $409,750  $530,000  $1,514,750 
Linda Siluk(5)
Interim Chief Financial Officer
 2017 $215,044  $12,856  $74,550  $  $302,450 
Celeste Fierro(6)
Senior Vice President – Marketing,
 2017 $357,375  $18,250  $213,000  $215,000  $803,625 
Sales and Events 2016 $275,000  $  $341,250  $  $616,250 

(1)These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value for stock grants awarded in 2016 and 2017, respectively, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. The grant date fair value of these awards, restricted stock units, assuming the maximum potential value is achieved was $426,000 for Emanuel Hilario in 2017, $409,750 for Jonathan Segal in 2016, $74,550 for Linda Siluk in 2017, and $213,000 and $341,250 for Celeste Fierro in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(2)The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted to the named executive officer in the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. The grant date fair value of the performance-based options is determined based on the probable outcome of such performance conditions as of the grant date.

The grant date fair value of the performance-based options assuming the maximum potential value is achieved was $530,000 for Mr. Segal in 2016. For Mr. Segal, we estimated the fair value of 500,000 stock options granted on April 8, 2016 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing the following assumptions: (i) expected volatility: 37%, (ii) expected term of option: 6.5 years, (iii) risk-free interest rate: 1.41%, (iv) expected dividend yield: 0%, and (v) weighted average grant date fair value: $1.06. 

The grant date fair value of the stock options assuming the maximum potential value is achieved was $156,000 for Mr. Hilario in 2017. For Mr. Hilario we estimated the fair value of 300,000 stock options granted October 30, 2017 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing the following assumptions: (i) expected volatility: 38%, (ii) expected term of option: 5.0 years, (iii) risk-free interest rate: 2.0%, (iv) expected dividend yield: 0%, and (v) weighted average grant date fair value $0.52.

The grant date fair value of the stock options assuming the maximum potential value is achieved was $215,000 for Ms. Fierro in 2017. For Ms. Fierro we estimated the fair value of 250,000 stock options granted May 15, 2017 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing the following assumptions: (i) expected volatility: 38%, (ii) expected term of option: 6.5 years, (iii) risk-free interest rate: 1.86%, (iv) expected dividend yield: 0%, and (v) weighted average grant date fair value $0.87.

(3)Mr. Hilario was appointed our President and Chief Executive Officer on October 30, 2017.

(4)Mr. Segal resigned as our President and Chief Executive Officer and was appointed our Director of Business Development on October 30, 2017.

(5)Ms. Siluk was appointed our Interim Chief Financial Officer on May 16, 2017.

(6)Ms. Fierro was appointed our Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Events on February 19, 2014.

44

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

President and Chief Executive Officer

Emanuel Hilario currently serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement dated October 30, 2017 (“Hilario Agreement”). The Hilario Agreement provides for a term of three years, with such term automatically extending for additional one-year periods unless either party provides 90 days written notice prior to the commencement of the renewal term. Mr. Hilario will initially receive an annual base salary of $450,000, and thereafter, he shall receive such increases (but no decreases) in his base salary asincorporated by reference from the Company’s Board or compensation committee thereof may approve in its sole discretion from time to time, but not less than annually. In addition, Mr. Hilario is eligible to receive a bonus for each calendar year during the term of the Hilario Agreement in an amount targeted at 50% of his then-effective annual base salary, based in part upon achievement of individual and corporate performance objectives as determined by the Board. Mr. Hilario shall be eligible to receive a bonus in excess of the targeted bonus if the Company’s performance exceeds 100% of the targeted goals, and a bonus below the target amount shall be payable if actual performance equals at least a minimum threshold, each as approved by the Board in consultation with Mr. Hilario at the time the annual performance goals are established. Whether Mr. Hilario receives a bonus, and the amount of any such bonus, will be determined by the Board in its sole and absolute discretion, except that any portion of the bonus that the Board determines to be based on targeted goals will be considered non-discretionary and payable based on achievement of such goals. Pursuant to the Hilario Agreement, the Company granted to Mr. Hilario pursuant to the Company’s 2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”): (a) 71,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock, (b) stock options to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock vesting ratably over three years at an exercise price equal to $1.42 (the “Closing Price”), such amount being the fair market value at the time of the grant; and (c) 300,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) vesting ratably over three years; provided, however, that such RSUs may vest earlier as follows: (i) 100,000 RSUs shall vest on the date that the Average Closing Price (defined below) is 50% greater than the Closing Price, (ii) 100,000 RSUs shall vest on the date that the Average Closing Price is 75% greater than the Closing Price, and (iii) 100,000 RSUs shall vest on the date that the Average Closing Price is 100% greater than the Closing Price. As used herein, “Average Closing Price” is equal to the average closing price of the Common’s common stock as measured over 10 consecutive trading days. The stock options and the RSUs are subject to the terms and conditions of the 2013 Plan and, respectively, a stock option agreement and a restricted stock unit award agreement. Mr. Hilario is eligible to participate in the Company's 401(k) plan, health plans and other benefits on the same terms as other salaried employees, and for so long as his primary residence is in Denver, Colorado, the Company will reimburse Mr. Hilario for his reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, accommodation in New York, and for round-trip coach tickets for travel to and from New York.

Noncompetition; Nonsolicitation

Under the Hilario Agreement, for a period of 18 months after the date on which his employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Hilario is prohibited from (a) engaging in any Competing Business within any geographic area where the Company or its subsidiaries conducts, or plans to conduct, business at the time of his termination, (b) persuading or attempting to persuade any Customer, Prospective Customer or Supplier to cease doing business with an Interested Party or reduce the amount of business it does with an Interested Party, (c) persuading or attempting to persuade any Service Provider to cease providing services to an Interested Party, or (d) soliciting for hire or hiring for himself or for any third party any Service Provider unless such person’s employment was terminated by the Company or any of its affiliates or such person responded to a “blind advertisement”. All capitalized terms in this paragraph shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Hilario Agreement.

Termination

Termination by the Company for Cause or by Executive without Good Reason

If the Hilario Agreement is terminated by the Company for cause, or by the executive without good reason, the Company must pay him any earned but unpaid salary, any unpaid portion of the bonus from the prior year, any accrued vacation time, any vested benefits he may have under any employee benefit plan, and any unpaid expense reimbursement accrued through the date of termination (the “Hilario Accrued Obligations”).

45

Termination by the Company without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason

If the Hilario Agreements is terminated (i) by the Company without cause or (ii) by the executive for good reason, then the Company must pay such executive: (1) the Hilario Accrued Obligations earned through the date of termination; (2) an amount of his base salary equal to (i) his current base salary in the case of Mr. Hilario over an 18 month period or (ii) his current base salary in the case of Mr. Segal over a 24 month period, such payments to be made in accordance with Company’s normal payroll practices, less all customary and required taxes and employment-related deductions; (3) an amount of his bonus compensation equal to (i) a monthly amount equal to one-twelfth of the target bonus in the case of Mr. Hilario for an 18 month period or (ii) a pro rata portion of the bonusProxy Statement for the year in which the termination occurs in the case2021 Annual Meeting of Mr. Segal, based on year-to-date performance as determined by the Board in good faith, payable when other senior executives receive their annual bonuses for such year, and in no event later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the termination occurs (to the extent milestones for such bonus have not yet been agreed upon as of the termination, reference will be made to the milestones established for the prior year); (4) any equity awards that vest over time and are unvested as of the termination date shall be accelerated such that the portion of the equity awards that would have vested in the following 18 month period will vest as of the termination date; and (5) an amount equal to the “COBRA” premium for as long as Mr. Hilario, and if applicable, Mr. Hilario’s dependents are eligible for COBRA, subject to a maximum of 18 months.Stockholders.

The terms “cause” and “good reason” have the respective meanings set forth in the Hilario Agreement.

Termination due to Death or Disability

If Mr. Hilario’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability, the Company must pay him or his estate, as applicable, any amounts payable by the Company under the above heading labeled “Termination by the Company for Cause or by Executive without Good Reason”.

The term “disability” has the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreements.

Termination upon a Change of Control

Notwithstanding anything in the Hilario Agreement to the contrary, in the event that Mr. Hilario’s employment is terminated within 24 months following a change of control and upon the fulfillment of certain other conditions, Mr. Hilario shall be entitled to receive his severance in a lump sum.

The terms “change in control” and “severance” have the respective meanings set forth in the Employment Agreements.

Director of Business Development

Jonathan Segal currently serves as our Director of Business Development pursuant to an amended and restated employment agreement dated October 30, 2017 (“Amended and Restated Segal Agreement”). The Amended and Restated Segal Agreement provides for a term of three years, with such term automatically extending for additional one year periods unless either party provides 90 days written notice prior to the commencement of the renewal term. Mr. Segal will initially receive an annual base salary of $350,000, and thereafter, he shall receive such increases (but no decreases) in his base salary as the Board or compensation committee thereof may approve in its sole discretion from time to time, but not less than annually. In addition, Mr. Segal is eligible to receive a bonus for each calendar year during the term of the Segal Agreement in an amount targeted at 75% of his then-effective annual base salary, based in part upon achievement of individual and corporate performance objectives as determined by the Board. Mr. Segal shall be eligible to receive a bonus in excess of the targeted bonus if the Company’s performance exceeds 100% of the targeted goals, and a bonus below the target amount shall be payable if actual performance equals at least a minimum threshold, each as approved by the Board in consultation with Mr. Segal at the time the annual performance goals are established. Whether Mr. Segal receives a bonus, and the amount of any such bonus, will be determined by the Board in its sole and absolute discretion, except that any portion of the bonus that the Board determines to be based on targeted goals will be considered non-discretionary and payable based on achievement of such goals. Mr. Segal is eligible to participate in the Company's 401(k) plan, health plans and other benefits on the same terms as other salaried employees.

Prior to entering into the Amended and Restated Segal Agreement, Mr. Segal received an annual base salary of $575,000 pursuant to his employment agreement with us. Mr. Segal received a bonus of $32,813 in 2017.

Noncompetition; Nonsolicitation

Under the Amended and Restated Segal Agreement, for a period of 24 months after the date on which his employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Segal is prohibited from (a) engaging in any Competing Business within any geographic area where the Company or its subsidiaries conducts, or plans to conduct, business at the time of his termination, (b) persuading or attempting to persuade any Customer, Prospective Customer or Supplier to cease doing business with an Interested Party or reduce the amount of business it does with an Interested Party, (c) persuading or attempting to persuade any Service Provider to cease providing services to an Interested Party, or (d) soliciting for hire or hiring for himself or for any third party any Service Provider unless such person’s employment was terminated by the Company or any of its affiliates or such person responded to a “blind advertisement”. All capitalized terms in this paragraph shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Amended and Restated Segal Agreement.

46

Termination

Termination by the Company for Cause or by Executive without Good Reason

If the Amended and Restated Segal Agreement is terminated by the Company for cause, or by Mr. Segal without good reason, the Company must pay him any earned but unpaid salary, any unpaid portion of the bonus from the prior year, any accrued vacation time, any vested benefits he may have under any employee benefit plan, and any unpaid expense reimbursement accrued through the date of termination (the “Segal Accrued Obligations”).

Termination by the Company without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason

If the Amended and Restated Segal Agreement is terminated (i) by the Company without cause or (ii) by the executive for good reason, then the Company must pay such executive: (1) the Segal Accrued Obligations earned through the date of termination; (2) an amount of his base salary equal to his current base salary over a 24 month period, such payments to be made in accordance with Company’s normal payroll practices, less all customary and required taxes and employment-related deductions; (3) an amount of his bonus compensation equal to a pro rata portion of the bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, based on year-to-date performance as determined by the Board in good faith, payable when other senior executives receive their annual bonuses for such year, and in no event later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the termination occurs (to the extent milestones for such bonus have not yet been agreed upon as of the termination, reference will be made to the milestones established for the prior year); (4) an amount equal to the “COBRA” premium for as long as Mr. Segal and, if applicable, Mr. Segal’s dependents are eligible for COBRA, subject to a maximum of 18 months.

The terms “cause” and “good reason” have the respective meanings set forth in the Employment Agreements.

Termination due to Death or Disability

If Mr. Segal’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability, the Company must pay him or his estate, as applicable, (1) the Segal Accrued Obligations earned through the date of termination and (2) a portion of the bonus that he would have been eligible to receive for days employed by the Company in the year in which his death or disability occurs, determined by multiplying (x) the bonus based on the actual level of achievement of the applicable performance goals for such year, by (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days up to and including the date of termination, and the denominator of which is 365, such amount to be paid in the same time and the same form as the bonus otherwise would be paid. In the event of the death or disability, vested options held by Mr. Segal may be exercised by him or his survivors, as applicable, to the extent exercisable at the time of death for a period of one year from the time of death or disability.

The term “disability” has the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreements.

Termination upon a Change of Control

Notwithstanding anything in the Amended and Restated Segal Agreement to the contrary, in the event that Mr. Segal’s employment is terminated within 12 months following a change in control and upon the fulfillment of certain other conditions, then (1) notwithstanding the vesting and exercisability schedule in any stock option agreement between the Company and Mr. Segal, all unvested stock options granted by the Company to Mr. Segal shall immediately vest and become exercisable and shall remain exercisable for not less than 360 days thereafter, and (2) Mr. Segal shall be entitled to receive his severance; provided, however, that if such lump sum severance payment, either alone or together with other payments or benefits, either cash or non-cash, that the executive has the right to receive from the Company, including, but not limited to, accelerated vesting or payment of any deferred compensation, options, stock appreciation rights or any benefits payable to the executive under any plan for the benefit of employees, would constitute an “excess parachute payment” (as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), then such lump sum severance payment or other benefit shall be reduced to the largest amount that will not result in receipt by the executive of an excess parachute payment. The determination of the amount of the payment described in this subsection shall be made by the Company’s independent auditors at the sole expense of the Company. For purposes of clarification the value of any options described above will be determined by the Company’s independent auditors using a Black-Scholes valuation methodology.

The terms “change in control” and “severance” have the respective meanings set forth in the Amended and Restated Segal Employment Agreement.

47

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Linda Siluk has served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer since May 16, 2017. Pursuant to an offer letter dated May 15, 2017, Ms. Siluk received a monthly salary of $27,500 and a grant of 35,000 restricted shares to vest upon the achievement of certain mutually agreed upon objectives. Ms. Siluk was to serve as the Interim Chief Financial Officer for a period of six months, with further employment to be considered.

Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Events

Celeste Fierro has served as our Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Events since February 19, 2014. Ms. Fierro is an at-will-employee. For the years ended December 31, 2015, Ms. Fierro’s annual salary was $250,000. On May 11, 2016, Ms. Fierro’s annual salary was raised to $365,000 and on March 29, 2017, she received a one-time discretionary bonus of $17,067 for her performance in overseeing certain catering events, which increased sales of the Company. On April 8, 2016, Ms. Fierro was granted 125,000 restricted stock units vesting ratably over five years beginning on April 8, 2017. On May 16, 2017, Ms. Fierro was granted (i) 250,000 incentive stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock and 100,000 restricted stock units, both vesting ratably over five years beginning on May 16, 2018; and (ii) 50,000 restricted stock units vesting upon certain performance goals being met.

2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan

In October 2013, our Board approved the 2013 Plan. Unless sooner terminated by our Board or our stockholders, the 2013 Plan will expire on October 16, 2023. Under our 2013 Plan, we may grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock grants and other stock based awards to employees, consultants and directors who, in the opinion of the Board, are in a position to make a significant contribution to our long-term success. The purpose of these awards is to attract and retain key individuals, further align employee and stockholder interests, and to closely link compensation with Company performance. The 2013 Plan provides an essential component of the total compensation package, reflecting the importance that we place on aligning the interests of key individuals with those of our stockholders. All employees, directors and consultants of the Company and its affiliates are eligible to participate in the 2013 Plan.

The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of awards under the 2013 Plan is 4,773,992 shares. This number is subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, stock dividend, combination, recapitalization or other change in our capitalization.

Shares of our common stock to be issued under the 2013 Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or previously issued shares acquired by us. Any shares of our common stock underlying awards that otherwise expire, terminate, or are forfeited prior to the issuance of stock will again be available for issuance under the 2013 Plan.

Stock Options.   Stock options granted under the 2013 Plan may either be incentive stock options, which are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or non-qualified stock options, which are not intended to meet those requirements. Incentive stock options may be granted to employees of the Company and its affiliates. Non-qualified options may be granted to employees, directors and consultants of the Company and its affiliates. The exercise price of a stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. If an incentive stock option is granted to an individual who owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of our capital stock, the exercise price may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and the term of the option may not be longer than five years.

Award agreements for stock options include rules for exercise of the stock options after termination of service. Options may not be exercised unless they are vested, and no option may be exercised after the end of the term set forth in the award agreement. Generally, stock options will be exercisable for three months after termination of service for any reason other than Cause, except in the case of death or total and permanent disability in which such options may be exercised for 12 months after termination of service.

Restricted Stock.   Restricted stock is common stock that is subject to restrictions, including a prohibition against transfer and a substantial risk of forfeiture, until the end of a “restricted period” during which the grantee must satisfy certain vesting conditions. If the grantee does not satisfy the vesting conditions by the end of the restricted period, the restricted stock is forfeited.

During the restricted period, the holder of restricted stock has the rights and privileges of a regular stockholder, except that the restrictions set forth in the applicable award agreement apply. For example, the holder of restricted stock may vote and receive dividends on the restricted shares; but he or she may not sell the shares until the restrictions are lifted.

48

Other Stock-Based Awards.   The 2013 Plan also authorizes the grant of other types of stock-based compensation including, but not limited to stock appreciation rights, phantom stock awards, and stock unit awards.

Plan Administration.   The 2013 Plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee will have full power and authority to determine the terms of awards granted pursuant to this plan, including:

which employees, directors and consultants shall be granted options and other awards;
the number of shares subject to each award;
the vesting provisions of each award;
the termination or cancellation provisions applicable to awards; and
all other terms and conditions upon which each award may be granted in accordance with the 2013 Plan.

In addition, the administrator may, in its discretion, amend any term or condition of an outstanding award, provided (i) such term or condition as amended is permitted by the 2013 Plan, and (ii) any such amendment shall be made only with the consent of the participant to whom such award was made, if the amendment is adverse to the participant; and provided, further, that without the prior approval of our stockholders, stock awards will not be repriced, replaced or regranted through cancellation or by lowering the exercise price of a previously granted award.

Stock Dividends and Stock Splits.   If our common stock shall be subdivided or combined into a greater or smaller number of shares or if we issue any shares of common stock as a stock dividend, the number of shares of our common stock deliverable upon exercise of an option issued or upon issuance of an award shall be appropriately increased or decreased proportionately, and appropriate adjustments shall be made in the purchase price per share to reflect such subdivision, combination or stock dividend.

Corporate Transactions.   Upon a merger or other reorganization event, our Board, may, in its sole discretion, take any one or more of the following actions pursuant to our 2013 Plan, as to some or all outstanding awards:

provide that all outstanding options shall be assumed or substituted by the successor corporation;
upon written notice to a participant provide that the participant’s unexercised options will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction unless exercised by the participant;
in the event of a merger pursuant to which holders of our common stock will receive a cash payment for each share surrendered in the merger, make or provide for a cash payment to the participants equal to the difference between the merger price times the number of shares of our common stock subject to such outstanding options, and the aggregate exercise price of all such outstanding options, in exchange for the termination of such options; or
provide that outstanding awards shall be assumed or substituted by the successor corporation, become realizable or deliverable, or restrictions applicable to an award will lapse, in whole or in part, prior to or upon the merger or reorganization event.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event such merger or other reorganization event also constitutes a change of control under the terms of the 2013 Plan, then all stock options outstanding on the date of the merger or other reorganization event shall be deemed vested at such time.

Under the terms of the 2013 Plan, a change of control means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any “Person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the “Beneficial Owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities (excluding for this purpose any such voting securities held by the Company or its affiliates or by any employee benefit plan of the Company) pursuant to a transaction or a series of related transactions which the Board does not approve; (ii) (A) a merger or consolidation of the Company whether or not approved by the Board, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or the parent of such corporation) more than 50% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or parent of such corporation, as the case may be, outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (B) the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets in a transaction requiring stockholder approval; or (iii) a change in the composition of the Board, as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors. “Incumbent Directors” are defined under the 2013 Plan as directors who either (A) were directors of the Company as of October 16, 2013, (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election or nomination (but shall not include an individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors to the Company) or (C) were appointed in connection with the consummation of the Merger.

49

Amendment and Termination.   The 2013 Plan may be amended by our stockholders. It may also be amended by our Board, provided that stockholder approval will be required for any amendment to the 2013 Plan to the extent such approval is required by law, including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or applicable stock exchange requirements. Any amendment approved by the Board which the Board determines is of a scope that requires stockholder approval shall be subject to obtaining such stockholder approval. No such amendment may adversely affect the rights under any outstanding award without the holder’s consent. In addition, if any stock market on which the Company’s common stock is traded amends its corporate governance rules so that such rules no longer require stockholder approval of “material amendments” of equity compensation plans, then, from and after the effective date of such an amendment to such rules, no amendment of the 2013 Plan which (i) materially increases the number of shares to be issued under the 2013 Plan (other than to reflect a reorganization, stock split, merger, spin off or similar transaction); (ii) materially increases the benefits to participants, including any material change to: (a) permit a repricing (or decrease in exercise price) of outstanding options, (b) reduce the price at which awards may be offered, or (c) extend the duration of the 2013 Plan; (iii) materially expands the class of participants eligible to participate in the 2013 Plan; or (iv) expands the types of awards provided under the 2013 Plan shall become effective unless stockholder approval is obtained.

On April 8, 2016, based upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, our Board adopted Amendment No. 1 to the 2013 Plan (the “Amendment”). The Amendment to the 2013 Plan was adopted to revise and clarify the effect of certain corporate transactions on awards granted (or to be granted) under the 2013 Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017

Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information as to equity awards held by each of the named executive officers of the Company at December 31, 2017.

  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested (#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested ($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 
Emanuel Hilario     300,000(1)    $1.42  10/30/2027        200,000(7) $478,000 
                                   
Linda Siluk                     35,000(8) $83,650 
                                   
Celeste Fierro  150,000   100,000(2)    $4.85  6/5/2024        100,000(9) $239,000 
      250,000(3)    $2.13  5/15/2027        100,000(8) $239,000 
                                   
Jonathan Segal  334,357   62,651(4)    $5.00  10/16/2023        150,000(10) $358,500 
         79,402(5) $5.00  10/16/2023            
         500,000(6) $2.73  4/8/2026            

(1)The option vests ratably over three years beginning on October 30, 2017.
(2)The option vests ratably over five years beginning on June 5, 2015.
(3)The option vests ratably over five years beginning on May 16, 2018.
(4)The option vests ratably over five years beginning on October 16, 2013.
(5)Up to 20% of the option will vest upon the achievement of certain annual performance milestones to be set by the Company each year for a five year period commencing with the 2014 fiscal year. Pursuant to the performance-based stock options granted on October 16, 2013, under the 2013 Plan, 114,044 unexercised options were forfeited on February 27, 2016, upon the expiration of the Company’s publicly traded warrants.
(6)The option will vest upon the last day of the quarter in which the closing price of our common stock reaches $5.00, $5.50 and $6.00 for ten consecutive trading days in the quarter, with 33% vesting at each respective price, no earlier than April 8, 2017.
(7)The restricted stock unit vests ratably over three years beginning on October 30, 2018; provided however that the restricted stock units may vest earlier upon the price of the Company’s common stock reaching an average closing stock price as measured over ten consecutive trading days of $2.13, $2.485 and $2.840 (the “Hurdles”) for ten consecutive trading days, with 100,000 RSUs vesting upon the achievement of each respective Hurdle. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s average closing stock price exceeded $2.13 as measured over ten consecutive trading days.
(8)The restricted stock unit will vest ratably over five years beginning on May 16, 2018.
(9)The restricted stock unit will vest ratably over five years beginning on April 8, 2017.
(10)The restricted stock unit will vest upon the last day of the quarter in which the closing price of our common stock reaches $5.00, $5.50 and $6.00 for ten consecutive trading days in the quarter, with 33% vesting at each respective price, no earlier than April 8, 2017.

50

Compensation of Directors

Each non-employee director in 2017 received fully vested stock grants equal to $40,000 at the fair market value on July 12, 2017, and $40,000 in director fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, in accordance with the 2013 Plan. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, the annual payment of directors’ fees was $80,000 per annum payable half in cash and half in options or restricted stock. The exercise price of options or restricted stock will equal or exceed the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and shall vest in full on such date. The Company will reimburse all directors for reasonable expenses incurred traveling to and from Board meetings. The Company does not pay employee directors any compensation for services as a director. Non-employee directors who serve as chairman of committees will earn an additional $10,000 per annum for such services.

2017 Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation paid or earned for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 to our non-employee directors.

Name Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
  Restricted
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Total
($)
 
Emanuel Hilario(3) $29,200  $40,000  $69,200 
Michael Serruya $50,000  $40,000  $90,000 
Nicholas Giannuzzi(4) $40,000  $40,000  $80,000 
Eugene M. Bullis $50,000  $40,000  $90,000 
Richard Perlman(5) $25,000  $  $25,000 
Kin Chan(6) $  $  $ 

(1)Each non-employee director in 2017 was paid a director’s fee of $40,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. A $10,000 committee chair fee was paid to Michael Serruya, Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Eugene Bullis, Chairman of the Audit Committee.
(2)Each non-employee director in 2017 received fully vested stock grants of 19,139 shares of common stock of the Company at the fair market value on July 12, 2017 in accordance with the 2013 Plan. The amounts in the “Restricted Stock Awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock granted during the year computed in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. For a description of these restricted stock awards, see the first paragraph of this “Compensation of Directors” section.
(3)On October 30, 2017, Emanuel Hilario was appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
(4)On November 15, 2017, Nicholas Giannuzzi resigned from his position as a member of the Board.
(5)On April 20, 2017, Richard Perlman resigned from his position as a member of the Board.
(6)On November 17, 2017, Kin Chan joined our Board and has not received Board fees as part of his directorship.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To our knowledge, there have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and no federal or state judicial or administrative orders, judgments or decrees or findings, no violations of any federal or state securities law, and no violations of any federal commodities law material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity of any director (existing or proposed) or executive officer (existing or proposed) of the Company during the past ten (10) years.

51

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forthInformation required by this item is incorporated by reference from the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of April 6, 2018, by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors and named executive officers and (iii) all current officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite the stockholder’s name, subject to community property laws, where applicable.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Shares of our common stock that may be acquired by an individual or group within 60 days of April 6, 2018, pursuant to the exercise of options, are deemed to be outstandingCompany’s Proxy Statement for the purpose2021 Annual Meeting of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table.Stockholders.

Percentage ownership calculations for beneficial ownership are based on 27,252,101 shares outstanding as of April 6, 2018. Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that the stockholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown to be beneficially owned by them, based on information provided to us by such stockholders. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each director and executive officer listed is: 411 West 14th Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
  Percentage of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned (%)
 
Emanuel Hilario  312,306   1.2%
Linda Siluk  7,000   * 
Celeste Fierro(2)  688,244   2.5%
Jonathan Segal(3)  7,363,204   26.7%
Michael Serruya(4)  285,397   1.1%
Eugene M. Bullis  42,486   * 
Kin Chan(5)  1,500,000   5.8%
Dimitrios Angelis     * 
All current executive officers and directors as a group
(8 individuals)
  10,198,637   37.4%

5% Stockholders: Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  Percentage of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned (%)
 

Kanen Wealth Management LLC(6)

5850 Coral Ridge Drive, Suite 309

Coral Springs, FL 33076

  4,836,273   17.3%
         

Anson Investments Master Fund(7)

c/o Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited

190 Elgin Avenue, George Town

Grand Cayman KY 1-9005, Cayman Islands

  2,112,921   8.2%
         

Argyle Street Management Limited(8)

Unit 601-2, 6th Floor

St. George’s Building

2 Ice House Street

Central, Hong Kong

  1,500,000   5.8%
         

Twinleaf Management, LLC(9)

131 Brookwood Lane

New Canaan, CT 06840

  1,270,704   5.0%

*Represents less than 1% of the issued and outstanding shares.

52

(1)All securities are beneficially owned directly by the persons listed on the table (except as otherwise indicated).
(2)Includes options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2018.
(3)Includes (i) 156,952 shares of common stock held by Modern Hotels (Holdings) Limited, of which Mr. Segal is the Managing Director, (ii) 386,166 shares of common stock held by the Jonathan Segal 2012 Family Trust, of which Mr. Segal is a trustee, (iii) 1,000,000 shares of common stock held by the Jonathan Segal 2016 Family Trust #2; and (iv) options to purchase 317,606 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2018.
(4)Includes 197,712 shares of common stock held by MOS Holdings Inc., an entity owned by Mr. Serruya.
(5)Consists of the shares listed in footnote 8 below.
(6)Based solely on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 28, 2018 by Kanen Wealth Management LLC, a Florida limited liability company and registered investment advisor (“KWM”) and David L. Kanen, the managing member, sole investment advisor representative and Chief Compliance Officer for KWM. KWM, in its role as investment manager for customer accounts (collectively, the “Accounts”), has discretionary voting and dispositive power over the shares of common stock held in the Accounts pursuant to investment advisory agreements. Mr. Kanen, as the managing member of KWM, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over such shares of common stock with KWM. KWM, as the general partner of The Philotimo Fund LLC, and Mr. Kanen, as the managing member of KWM, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over the shares of common stock held by The Philotimo Fund LLC. As of the close of business on March 19, 2018, Kanen Wealth Management, LLC directly owned 2,866,273 Shares. Kanen Wealth Management, LLC, as the general partner of Philotimo Fund, LP, may be deemed the beneficial owner of the 1,970,000 Shares owned by Philotimo Fund, LP.  As of the close of business on March 19, 2018, Mr. Kanen directly owned 18,921 Shares. Mr. Kanen, as the managing member of Kanen Wealth Management, LLC, may be deemed the beneficial owner of the (i) 2,866,273 Shares owned by Kanen Wealth Management, LLC and (ii) 1,970,000 Shares owned by Philotimo Fund, LP. The number of shares beneficially owned includes 125,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of certain warrants owned by The Philotimo Fund LLC.
(7)Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 2, 2018 by Anson Investments Master Fund LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership, Anson Funds Management LP (d/b/a Anson Group), a Texas limited partnership, Anson Management GP LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Mr. Bruce R. Winson, the principal of Anson Funds Management LP and Anson Management GP, LLC, Anson Advisors Inc. (d/b/a Anson Funds), an Ontario, Canada corporation, Mr. Adam Spears, a director of Anson Advisors Inc., and Mr. Moez Kassam, a director of Anson Advisors, Inc. Anson Funds Management LP and Anson Advisors Inc. serve as co-investment advisors to Anson Investments Master Fund LP and may direct the vote and disposition of the 2,112,921 shares of Common Stock held by Anson Investments Master Fund LP. As the general partner of Anson Funds Management LP, Anson Management GP LLC may direct the vote and disposition of the 2,112,921 shares of Common Stock held by Anson Investments Master Fund LP. As the principal of Anson Fund Management LP and Anson Management GP LLC, Mr. Winson may direct the vote and disposition of the 2,112,921 shares of Common Stock held by Anson Investments Master Fund LP. As directors of Anson Advisors Inc., Mr. Spears and Mr. Kassam may each direct the vote and disposition of the 2,112,921 shares of Common Stock held by Anson Investments Master Fund LP. The number of shares beneficially owned includes 640,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of certain warrants owned by Anson Investments Master Fund LP.  
(8)Includes 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 500,000 Warrants relating to the Common Stock exercisable from May 15, 2018 at an exercise price of US$1.63 per share of Common Stock, beneficially owned by (i) ASM Connaught House Fund LP (520,000 shares of Common Stock and 260,000 Warrants), (ii) ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP (360,000 shares of Common Stock and 180,000 Warrants) and (iii) ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I (120,000 shares of Common Stock and 60,000 Warrants). Based solely on a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018 by Argyle Street Management Limited, a British Virgin Islands  incorporated company, whose principal business is to act as investment manager of ASM Connaught House Fund LP, ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP and ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I. Our director, Mr. Kin Chan acts as chief investment officer to Argyle Street Management Limited; Argyle Street Management Limited, in its capacity as investment manager of ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I, ASM Connaught House Fund LP and ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP, has the ability to direct the management of ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I, ASM Connaught House Fund LP and ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP’s business. As such, Mr. Kin Chan has the power to direct the decisions of Argyle Street Management Limited, which itself has the power to direct the decisions of ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I, ASM Connaught House Fund LP and ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP regarding the vote and disposition of securities directly or indirectly beneficially held by ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I, ASM Connaught House Fund LP and ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP; therefore, Mr. Kin Chan may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of the Common Stock beneficially held  by ASM Co-Investment Term Trust I, ASM Connaught House Fund LP  and ASM Connaught House (Master) Fund II LP.
(9)Based solely on a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on March 28, 2018, by Twinleaf Management, LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company. The shares are allocated across ten discretionary client accounts (the “Client Accounts”). Such clients have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such securities. No such client contains an interest relating to more than five percent of the class of securities. Spencer Grimes, as managing member of Twinleaf Management LLC may be deemed to beneficially own the 1,270,704 shares of common stock allocated to the Client Accounts.  

53

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2017, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance. For a description of the terms of the Company’s equity compensation plan, please see “Executive Compensation — 2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan” included in Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Plan Category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
or rights
(a)
  Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
(b)
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  3,300,035  $3.41   473,041 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Mr. SegalInformation required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Executive Chairman of the Board, the Director of Business Development and a principal stockholder of the Company. As of April 6, 2018, Mr. Segal beneficially owned approximately 27% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

Lease Guarantees

Mr. Segal is a limited personal guarantor of the leasesCompany’s Proxy Statement for the STK Miami premises with respect to certain covenants under the lease relating to construction2021 Annual Meeting of the new premises and helping the landlord obtain a new liquor license for the premises in the event of termination of the lease. Mr. Segal is a limited personal guarantor of the leases for the Bagatelle New York premises with respect to JEC II, LLC’s payment and performance under the lease.Stockholders.

Personal Interests in Subsidiaries

Mr. Segal currently owns 85% of Hip Hospitality LLC, which owns 50% of Bagatelle America, LLC (“Bagatelle America”). Bagatelle America is the Manager of our Bagatelle Little West 12th LLC subsidiary, which owns and operates our Bagatelle — NY restaurant. As Manager, Bagatelle America receives an annual management fee of 5% of the Adjusted Gross Revenue (as defined in the management agreements with each subsidiary). Bagatelle America is also the holder of the trademark for “Bagatelle,” which it licenses royalty free to Bagatelle La Cienega, LLC and Bagatelle Little West 12th LLC.

Ms. Fierro owns 5.19% of Little West 12th, LLC, which currently owns and operates our STK Downtown restaurant.

Related Party Services

Mr. Giannuzzi, who resigned from his position as a director effective November 16, 2017 is the managing partner of The Giannuzzi Group, LLP, a law firm that provided legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries. In 2016 and 2017, we paid The Giannuzzi Group, LLP approximately $503,700 and $330,000 for legal services rendered, respectively. In addition, The Giannuzzi Group, LLP subleases its office space from the Company, for which it currently pays the Company $16,500 per month. The sublease expires in August 2021.

Policy for Approval of Related Person Transactions

Our Audit Committee was established in November 2013, is comprised of independent directors and will review and approve all related-party transactions.

54

Pursuant to the written charter of our audit committee, the audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, prior to our entry into any such transaction, all transactions in which we are a participant and in which any parties related to us, including our executive officers, our directors, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our securities, immediate family members of the foregoing persons and any other persons whom our Board determines may be considered related parties under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

In reviewing and approving such transactions, the audit committee shall obtain, or shall direct our management to obtain on its behalf, all information that the committee believes to be relevant and important to a review of the transaction prior to its approval. Following receipt of the necessary information, a discussion shall be held of the relevant factors if deemed to be necessary by the committee prior to approval. If a discussion is not deemed to be necessary, approval may be given by written consent of the committee. This approval authority may also be delegated to the chairman of the audit committee in some circumstances.

The audit committee or its chairman, as the case may be, shall approve only those related party transactions that are determined to be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of us and our stockholders, taking into account all available facts and circumstances as the committee or the chairman determines in good faith to be necessary in accordance with principles of Delaware law generally applicable to directors of a Delaware corporation. These facts and circumstances will typically include, but not be limited to, the benefits of the transaction to us; the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related party is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, stockholder or executive officer; the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; the terms of the transaction; and the terms of comparable transactions that would be available to unrelated third parties or to employees generally. No member of the audit committee shall participate in any review, consideration or approval of any related party transaction with respect to which the member or any of his or her immediate family members has an interest.

Director Independence

Our Board has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with us, either directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, our Board has determined that the following members of our Board are “independent directors” as defined by the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”): Michael Serruya, Eugene M. Bullis, Kin Chan and Dimitrios Angelis.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Grant Thornton LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and audited financial statementsInformation required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and fees billed for other services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP during those periods.

  2017  2016 
Audit fees:(1) $650,467  $431,972 
Audit related fees:      
Tax fees:      
All other fees:      
Total $650,467  $431,972 

(1)Audit fees consisted of audit work performed in the preparation and audit of the annual financial statements, review of quarterly financial statements, as well as work that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, such as the provision of consents and comfort letters in connection with the filing of registration statements, Current Reports on Form 8-K and related amendments and statutory audits.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-audit Services of Independent Public Accountant

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm.

55

43


Prior to engagementTable of an independent registered public accounting firm for the next year’s audit, management will submit an aggregate of services expected to be rendered during that year for each of four categories of services to the Audit Committee for approval.Contents

1.Audit services include audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements, as well as work that generally only an independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably be expected to provide, including comfort letters, statutory audits, and attest services and consultation regarding financial accounting and/or reporting standards.

2.Audit-Related services are for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by an independent registered public accounting firm, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plan audits, and special procedures required to meet certain regulatory requirements.

3.Tax services include all services performed by an independent registered public accounting firm’s tax personnel except those services specifically related to the audit of the financial statements, and includes fees in the areas of tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

4.Other Fees are those associated with services not captured in the other categories. The Company generally does not request such services from our independent registered public accounting firm.

Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category of service. The fees are budgeted and the Audit Committee requires our independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage our independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

In the event the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will reconsider its appointment.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)

Financial Statements. For the financial statements included in this annual report, see “Index to the Financial Statements” on page F-1.

(a)(3)

Exhibits. The list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated by reference in this Item 15(a)(3).

(b)

Exhibits.See Exhibit Index.

(c)

Separate Financial Statements. None.

56

44


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: March 19, 2021

Dated: April 17, 2018

THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC.

By:

/s/ LINDA SILUKTYLER LOY

Linda Siluk

Tyler Loy

Interim

Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ EMANUEL HILARIO

Chief Executive Officer and Director

April 17, 2018

March 19, 2021

Emanuel Hilario

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ LINDA SILUKTYLER LOY

Interim

Chief Financial Officer

April 17, 2018

March 19, 2021

Linda Siluk

Tyler Loy

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ CHRISTI HING

Chief Accounting Officer

March 19, 2021

Christi Hing

(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ JONATHAN SEGAL

Executive Chairman, Director

April 17, 2018

March 19, 2021

Jonathan Segal

/s/ DIMITRIOS ANGELIS

Director

March 19, 2021

Dimitrios Angelis

/s/ EUGENE BULLIS

Director

April 17, 2018

March 19, 2021

Eugene Bullis

/s/ KIN CHANDirectorApril 17, 2018
Kin Chan

/s/ MICHAEL SERRUYA

Director

April 17, 2018

March 19, 2021

Michael Serruya

/s/ DIMITRIOS ANGELISDirectorApril 17, 2018
Dimitrios Angelis

45


Exhibit Index

57

Exhibit Index

Exhibit NumberExhibit Description
2.1

Exhibit
Number

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 16, 2013, by and among the Registrant, CCAC Acquisition Sub, LLC, The One Group, LLC, and Samuel Goldfinger, as Company Representative. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).

Exhibit Description

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2014).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2011).

4.1

Description of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed on March 26, 2020).

4.2

Specimen Unit Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 filed on July 22, 2011).

4.2

4.3

Specimen Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 filed on July 22, 2011).

4.3

4.4

Specimen Warrant Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 filed on July 22, 2011).

4.4

4.5

Warrant Agreement, dated October 24, 2011, by and between the Registrant and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2011).

4.5

4.6

Form of Senior Indenture (Incorporated by reference to Form S-3 filed on April 15, 2015).
4.6Form of Subordinated Indenture (Incorporated by reference to Form S-3 filed on April 15, 2015).
4.7Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 11, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016).
4.8

Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of October 24, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2016).

4.9

4.7

Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of November 15, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 16, 2017).

10.1

Form of Indemnity Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 filed on June 30, 2011).

10.2Escrow Agreement, dated October 16, 2013, by and among the Registrant, The One Group, LLC, Samuel Goldfinger, as Company Representative, the Liquidating Trust and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Escrow Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.3Second Term Loan Agreement, dated June 2, 2015, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, CA Aldwych Limited, HIP Hospitality Limited, STK Chicago, LLC, STK Denver, LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC, STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando, LLC, STK Westwood, LLC, T.O.G. (Aldwych) Limited, T.O.G. (UK) Limited, TOG Biscayne, LLC, and WSATOG (Miami) LLC and BankUnited, N.A.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).
10.4Second Term Note of The ONE Group, LLC to BankUnited, N.A., dated June 2, 2015, in the principal amount of $6,000,000.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).
10.5Grant of Security Interest (Trademarks), dated June 2, 2015, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and BankUnited, N.A.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).
10.6Second Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated June 2, 2015, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and BankUnited, N.A.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).
10.7Fifth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated June 2, 2015, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, STK Chicago, LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC, STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando, LLC, TOG Biscayne, LLC, WSATOG (Miami) LLC, STK Westwood, LLC,  and STK Denver, LLC, and BankUnited, N.A.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).
10.8Second Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated June 2, 2015, by and between The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and BankUnited, N.A.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).
10.9Guarantee Agreement, dated June 2, 2015, by and between The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and BankUnited, N.A.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2015).

10. 2†

10.10Term Loan Agreement, dated December 17, 2014, by and between The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, CA Aldwych Limited, HIP Hospitality Limited, STK Chicago, LLC, STK Denver, LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC, STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando, LLC, STK Westwood, LLC, T.O.G. (Aldwych) Limited, T.O.G. (UK) Limited, TOG Biscayne, LLC, and WSATOG (Miami) LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.11Term Note of The ONE Group, LLC to BankUnited, N.A., dated December 17, 2014, in the principal amount of $7,475,000.07. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.12Grant of Security Interest (Trademarks), dated December 17, 2014, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.13Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated December 17, 2014, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.14Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated December 17, 2014, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, STK Chicago, LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC, STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando, LLC, TOG Biscayne, LLC, WSATOG (Miami), LLC, STK Westwood, LLC, STK Denver, LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.15Credit Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.16Promissory Note of The ONE Group, LLC to Herald National Bank, dated October 31, 2011, in the principal amount of $1,250,000. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.17Guarantee, dated October 31, 2011, of Jonathan Segal to Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.18Pledge Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.19Pledge Acknowledgment Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.20Pledge Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and between Jonathan Segal and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.21Pledge Acknowledgment Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and between Jonathan Segal and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.22Subordination Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, RCI II, Ltd. and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.23Subordination Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, Talia, Ltd. and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.24Subordination Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, Jonathan Segal and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.25Grant of Security Interest (Trademarks), dated October 31, 2011, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.26Promissory Note of The ONE Group, LLC to Herald National Bank, dated April 11, 2012, in the principal amount of $1,500,000. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.27Promissory Note of The ONE Group, LLC to Herald National Bank, dated November 15, 2012, in the principal amount of $500,000. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.28Amendment No 1 and Addendum to Credit Agreement, dated January 24, 2013, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, Heraea Vegas, LLC, Xi Shi Las Vegas, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).

10.29Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated January 24, 2013, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, Heraea Vegas, LLC, Xi Shi Las Vegas, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.30Grant of Security Interest (Trademarks), dated January 24, 2013, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.31Amendment No 2 and Addendum to Credit Agreement and Consent and Termination Agreement, dated October 15, 2013, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, Heraea Vegas, LLC, Xi Shi Las Vegas, LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.32Guarantee Agreement, dated October 25, 2013, by and between the Registrant and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2013).
10.33Pledge Agreement, dated October 25, 2013, by and between the Registrant and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2013).
10.34Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated June 3, 2014, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.35Amendment No. 4 and Addendum to Credit Agreement, dated August 6, 2014, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, CA Aldwych Limited, HIP Hospitality Limited, STK Chicago, LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC,  STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando, LLC, T.O.G. (Aldwych) Limited, T.O.G. (UK) Limited, TOG Biscayne, LLC, WSATOG (Miami) LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (formerly Herald National Bank) (Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2014).
10.36Second Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated August 6, 2014, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, STK Chicago LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Orlando LLC, TOG Biscayne, LLC, WSATOG (Miami), LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (formerly Herald National Bank) (Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2014).
10.37Grant of Security Interest (Trademarks), dated August 6, 2014, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Herald National Bank (Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2014).
10.38

Amendment No. 5 and Addendum to Credit Agreement, dated October 31, 2014, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, CA Aldwych Limited, HIP Hospitality Limited, STK Chicago, LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC,  STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando, LLC, T.O.G. (Aldwych) Limited, T.O.G. (UK) Limited, TOG Biscayne, LLC, WSATOG (Miami) LLC, STK Westwood, LLC  and BankUnited, N.A. (formerly Herald National Bank). (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).

10.39Third Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated October 31, 2014, by and among The ONE Group, LLC, One 29 Park Management, LLC, STK-Las Vegas, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, STK Chicago LLC, STK-LA, LLC, STK Miami, LLC, STK Miami Service, LLC, STK Midtown Holdings, LLC, STK Midtown, LLC, STK Orlando LLC, TOG Biscayne, LLC, WSATOG (Miami), LLC, STK Westwood, LLC and BankUnited, N.A. (formerly Herald National Bank). (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.40Grant of Security Interest (Trademarks), dated October 31, 2014, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Herald National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K/A filed on April 1, 2015).
10.41†Employment Agreement, dated October 16, 2013, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Jonathan Segal. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.42†Employment Agreement, dated October 16, 2013, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Samuel Goldfinger. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.43†Separation Agreement, dated April 21, 2017, by and between Samuel Goldfinger and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2017).
10.44†

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated October 30, 2017, by and between The OneONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and Jonathan Segal (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2017).

10.45†

10.3

Employment Agreement, dated October 30, 2017, by and between The One Group Hospitality, Inc. and Emanuel Hilario (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2017).
10.46

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 15, 2017, among The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and certain investors (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 16, 2017).

10.47Transfer Agreement, dated January 1, 2012, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Celeste Fierro. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.48

10.4†

Transfer Agreement, dated January 1, 2012, by and between The ONE Group, LLC and Modern Hotels (Holdings), Limited. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).
10.49†2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2013).
10.50†

Form of Stock Option Grant Notice. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013).

10.51

10.5†

LoanThe One Group Hospitality, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2019).

10.6†

Employment Agreement bybetween Emanuel Hilario and between The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. dated September 3, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2019).

10.7†

Employment Letter Agreement with Tyler Loy Effective April 1, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K filed on March 26, 2020).

10.8

Credit and Anson Investments Master Fund L.P.,Guaranty Agreement dated October 4, 2019 with Goldman Sachs Bank USA (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K/A filed on October 8, 2019).

10.9

Second Amendment to Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated August 10, 2020 between The ONE Group, LLC, certain other credit parties, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as of August 11, 2016administrative agent for the lenders (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)12, 2020).

10.52

10.10

Unsecured Promissory NoteFirst Amendment to Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated May 8, 2020 between The ONE Group, LLC, certain other credit parties, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as of August 11, 2016administrative agent for the lenders (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)May 8, 2020).

10.53

10.11

Loan Agreement byPromissory Note effective May 4, 2020 between Kona Grill Acquisition, LLC and between The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and Anson Investments Master Fund L.P., dated as of October 24, 2016BBVA USA (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2016)May 8, 2020).

10.54

10.12

Unsecured Promissory Note dated as of October 24, 2016effective May 4, 2020 between The ONE Group, LLC and BBVA USA (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2016)May 8, 2020).

10.55

10.13†

Business LoanForm of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Security Agreement by and among STK Midtown, LLC, Little West 12th LLC, STK Miami, LLC, STK Atlanta, LLC, STK Westwood, LLC, STK Chicago LLC, STK Orlando LLC and American Express Bank, FSB, dated as of February 17, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2017).

14.1Code of Business and Ethics (Incorporated by referenceExhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2014)March 26, 2020).

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries.

23.1*

Consent of Grant Thornton LLPPlante & Moran, PLLC

31.1*

23.2*

Consent of Plante Moran, PC

31.1*

Certification of Emanuel Hilario, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*

Certification of Linda Siluk,Tyler Loy, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**

Certification of Emanuel Hilario, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.2**

Certification of Linda Siluk,Tyler Loy, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101.CAL*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.INS*

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

*Filed herewith.
**

Furnished herewith.

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


*      Filed herewith.

**    Furnished herewith.

†      Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

46



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

Opinion on the financial statementsFinancial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020 the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,(loss) income, changes in stockholders’stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear  ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear then ended, December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for opinionOpinion

These

The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our auditsaudit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our auditsaudit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.
New York, New York
April 17, 2018

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Evaluation of Long-Lived Asset Impairment Indicators – Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

F-2

As disclosed in the consolidated financial statements, long-lived assets including property and equipment, right-of-use assets, and the Kona tradename are tested for impairment at the asset group level, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of these assets may not be fully recoverable.

F-2


We identified the evaluation of long-lived asset impairment indicators as a critical audit matter because evaluating management’s assessment of potential impairment indicators, such as a significant decrease in the market value of an asset group, a material adverse change in how an asset group is utilized, or a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses, requires a high degree of auditor judgment to evaluate and assess whether such events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter:

We obtained an understanding of the Company’s process to evaluate long-lived assets for impairment and related controls.
We evaluated the Company’s assessment that there were no indicators of impairment. This assessment included consideration that current year losses were not indicative of future expected results and that future results were not expected to produce continuing losses.
We considered macroeconomic indicators such as current and projected easing of government lockdowns by key regions within the country and its effects on restaurant seating capacity and operating restrictions.

Assessment of Realizability of Deferred Tax Assets – Refer to Notes 1 and 11 of the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As discussed in the consolidated financial statements, the Company records a valuation allowance based on management’s assessment of the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets. For the year-ended December 31, 2020, the Company had deferred tax assets of $13.2 million, with no valuation allowance.

Auditing management’s assessment of recoverability of deferred tax assets in the U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions involved subjective estimation and complex auditor judgment in determining whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to support the realization of the existing deferred tax assets before expiration. These judgments are significantly more difficult in light of COVID-19 and the subjectivity of government rules and regulations being applied to the restaurant industry.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter:

We obtained an understanding of the Company’s process and related controls to evaluate the deferred tax valuation allowance.
We evaluated the assumptions used by the Company and its external tax advisors in evaluating historic losses and management’s assumptions used to develop projections of future taxable income, and we tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the projections.
We evaluated the COVID-19 impact on 2020 results.
We compared the projections of future taxable income with the actual results of prior periods (pre-COVID-19), including results from acquisitions, as well as management’s consideration of current actual results and industry and economic trends, COVID-19 vaccination trends, and current and expected government restrictions on individual restaurants and duration of such impacts.

F-3


 

With the assistance from our internal tax specialists, we reviewed changes in tax law to ensure they are being correctly applied to the tax provision and projections of future taxable income, including the changes embedded within COVID relief legislation.

Commitments and Contingencies – Refer to Notes 7 and 19 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company has contingent liabilities related to litigation and claims that arise in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for contingent liabilities when management determines it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

We identified the evaluation of loss contingencies and the related disclosure as a critical audit matter because evaluating the likelihood of potential outcomes and the expected loss involves significant judgement by management. This required a high degree of auditor judgment to evaluate management’s probability assessment and estimated loss resulting from this litigation.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter:

We obtained an understanding of the Company’s process to evaluate loss contingencies.
We obtained and evaluated audit inquiry response letters from external legal counsel and discussed the progress and status of certain cases with the external general counsel.
We obtained management’s analysis of legal proceedings and other contingencies, reviewed supporting documentation including court filings, and held discussions with management.
Based on the audit evidence we obtained, we evaluated the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding whether an unfavorable outcome was reasonably possible or probable and reasonably estimable, and we evaluated the reasonableness of all loss contingencies recorded.
We evaluated the sufficiency of the Company’s disclosures related to legal proceedings and other contingencies.

/s/ Plante & Moran PLLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

Boulder, Colorado

March 19, 2021

March 18, 2021

F-4


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes, collectively referred to as the “financial statements”. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Plante & Moran PC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

Boulder, Colorado

March 26, 2020

F-5


THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share information)

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2020

2019

ASSETS

 

  

Current assets:

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

$

24,385

$

12,344

Accounts receivable

 

5,777

 

10,351

Inventory

 

2,490

 

3,058

Other current assets

 

1,348

 

1,047

Due from related parties, net

 

376

 

341

Total current assets

 

34,376

 

27,141

 

  

 

  

Property and equipment, net

 

67,344

 

70,483

Operating lease right-of-use assets

80,960

81,097

Deferred tax assets, net

 

13,226

 

7,751

Intangibles, net

16,313

17,183

Other assets

 

2,446

 

1,622

Security deposits

 

904

 

1,308

Total assets

$

215,569

$

206,585

 

  

 

  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

  

 

  

Current liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Accounts payable

$

7,404

$

8,274

Accrued expenses

 

15,684

 

11,198

Deferred license revenue

 

207

 

332

Deferred gift card revenue and other

 

1,990

 

3,183

Current portion of operating lease liabilities

4,817

4,397

Current portion of CARES Act Loans

10,057

Current portion of long-term debt

 

588

 

749

Total current liabilities

 

40,747

 

28,133

 

  

 

  

Deferred license revenue, long-term

 

953

 

1,036

Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion

98,569

98,278

CARES Act Loans, net of current portion

 

8,257

 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

45,064

 

45,226

Total liabilities

 

193,590

 

172,673

 

  

 

  

Commitments and contingencies

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Stockholders’ equity:

 

  

 

  

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized; 29,083,183 and 28,603,829 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively

 

3

 

3

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

46,538

 

44,853

Accumulated deficit

 

(20,716)

 

(7,891)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(2,646)

 

(2,651)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

23,179

 

34,314

Noncontrolling interests

 

(1,200)

 

(402)

Total equity

 

21,979

 

33,912

Total liabilities and equity

$

215,569

$

206,585

  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Assets        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $1,548  $918 
Accounts receivable  5,514   4,960 
Inventory  1,402   1,309 
Other current assets  1,299   1,743 
Due from related parties, net     

416

 
Total current assets  9,763   9,346 
         
Property & equipment, net  37,811   36,815 
Investments  2,957   3,066 
Deferred tax assets, net  69   51 
Other assets  384   662 
Security deposits  2,031   

2,204

 
Total assets $53,015  $52,144 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $5,329  $3,762 
Accrued expenses  6,987   5,549 
Deferred license revenue  115   110 
Deferred gift card revenue  999   613 
Due to related parties, net  256    
Current portion of long-term debt  3,241   3,154 
Total current liabilities  16,927   13,188 
         
Deferred license revenue, long-term  1,222   1,110 
Due to related parties, long-term  1,197   1,197 
Deferred rent and tenant improvement allowances  17,001   16,171 
Long-term debt, net of current portion  10,115   13,099 
Total liabilities  46,462   44,765 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ equity:        
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized; 27,152,101 and 25,050,628 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively  3   3 
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016      
Additional paid-in capital  41,007   37,384 
Accumulated deficit  (31,979)  (27,763)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (1,556)  (1,544)
Total stockholders’ equity  7,475   8,080 
Noncontrolling interests  (922)  (701)
Total equity  6,553   7,379 
Total Liabilities and Equity $53,015  $52,144 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-3

F-6


THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(LOSS) INCOME

(in thousands, except earnings per share and related share information)

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Revenues:

 

  

 

  

Owned restaurant net revenue

$

136,618

$

108,775

Management, license and incentive fee revenue

 

5,325

 

11,906

Total revenues

 

141,943

 

120,681

Cost and expenses:

 

  

 

  

Owned operating expenses:

Owned restaurant cost of sales

 

34,024

 

28,005

Owned restaurant operating expenses

 

87,042

 

67,883

Total owned operating expenses

 

121,066

 

95,888

General and administrative (including stock-based compensation of $1,773 and $1,306 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively)

 

13,922

 

11,472

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,114

 

5,404

COVID-19 related expenses

 

5,492

 

Transaction costs

 

1,109

 

2,513

Lease termination expenses

 

3,315

 

573

Agreement restructuring expenses

 

452

 

Pre-opening expenses

 

178

 

565

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

(10,963)

Loss on impairment of investments

2,684

Other income, net

 

(11)

 

(246)

Total costs and expenses

 

155,637

 

107,890

Operating (loss) income

 

(13,694)

 

12,791

Other expenses, net:

 

  

 

  

Interest expense, net of interest income

 

5,329

 

1,954

Loss on early debt extinguishment

858

Total other expenses, net

 

5,329

 

2,812

(Loss) income before benefit for income taxes

 

(19,023)

 

9,979

Benefit for income taxes

 

(5,400)

 

(11,154)

Net (loss) income

 

(13,623)

 

21,133

Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

(798)

 

302

Net (loss) income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

(12,825)

$

20,831

Currency translation gain (loss)

 

5

 

(341)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to The One Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

(12,820)

$

20,490

 

  

 

  

Net income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. per share:

 

  

 

  

Basic net (loss) income per share

$

(0.44)

$

0.73

Diluted net (loss) income per share

$

(0.44)

$

0.70

 

  

 

  

Shares used in computing basic earnings per share

 

28,909,963

 

28,454,385

Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share

 

28,909,963

 

29,636,219

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues:        
Owned restaurant net revenues $58,654  $54,068 
Owned food, beverage and other net revenues  10,227   9,880 
Total owned revenue  68,881   63,948 
Management, license and incentive fee revenue  10,779   8,466 
Total revenues  79,660   72,414 
         
Cost and expenses:        
Owned operating expenses:        
Owned restaurants:        
Owned restaurant cost of sales  15,544   13,781 
Owned restaurant operating expenses  37,076   34,542 
Total owned restaurant expenses  52,620   48,323 
Owned food, beverage and other expenses  9,400   8,805 
Total owned operating expenses  62,020   57,128 
General and administrative (including stock-based compensation of $1,052 and $838, respectively)  11,893   11,172 
Settlements  1,245    
Depreciation and amortization  3,051   2,647 
Lease termination expense and asset write-offs  2,225   529 
Pre-opening expenses  1,595   5,994 
Transaction costs  421   1,293 
Equity in income of investee companies  (168)  (674)
Other expense (income), net  36   (46)
Total costs and expenses  82,318   78,043 
         
Operating loss  (2,658)  (5,629)
Other expenses, net:        
Derivative income     (100)
Interest expense, net of interest income  1,167   464 
Total other expenses, net  1,167   364 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes  (3,825)  (5,993)
Provision for income taxes  600   10,370 
         
Loss from continuing operations  (4,425)  (16,363)
         
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  397   (92)
         
Net loss  (4,028)  (16,455)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  188   233 
Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $(4,216) $(16,688)
         
Currency translation adjustment  (12)  (1,124)
Comprehensive loss $(4,228) $(17,812)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share:        
Continuing operations $(0.18) $(0.66)
Discontinued operations $0.02  $ 
Attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. $(0.17) $(0.66)
         
Shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per share  25,402,330   25,078,113 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-4

F-7


THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share information)

Accumulated

Additional

other

Common stock

paid-in

Accumulated

comprehensive

Stockholders’

Noncontrolling

    

Shares

    

Par value

    

capital

    

deficit

    

loss

    

equity

    

interests

    

Total

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

28,313,017

$

3

$

43,543

$

(28,722)

$

(2,310)

$

12,514

$

(452)

$

12,062

Stock-based compensation

 

47,469

 

 

1,218

 

 

 

1,218

 

 

1,218

Exercise of stock options

 

42,000

 

 

92

 

 

 

92

 

 

92

Issuance of vested restricted shares, net of tax withholding

 

201,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(252)

 

(252)

Loss on foreign currency translation, net

 

 

 

 

 

(341)

 

(341)

 

 

(341)

Net income

 

 

 

 

20,831

 

 

20,831

 

302

 

21,133

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

28,603,829

$

3

$

44,853

$

(7,891)

$

(2,651)

$

34,314

$

(402)

$

33,912

Stock-based compensation

 

226,983

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

1,773

 

 

1,773

Exercise of stock options

 

18,000

 

 

38

 

 

 

38

 

 

38

Issuance of vested restricted shares, net of tax withholding

 

234,371

 

 

(126)

 

 

 

(126)

 

 

(126)

Gain on foreign currency translation, net

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

5

 

 

5

Net loss

 

 

 

 

(12,825)

 

 

(12,825)

 

(798)

 

(13,623)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 

29,083,183

$

3

$

46,538

$

(20,716)

$

(2,646)

$

23,179

$

(1,200)

$

21,979

  Common stock        Accumulated         
  Shares  Par value  Additional
paid-in
capital
  Accumulated
deficit
  other
comprehensive
loss
  Stockholders’
equity
 Noncontrolling
interests
  Total 
                        
Balance at December 31, 2015  24,972,515  $3  $31,778  $(11,075) $(420) $20,286 $(681) $19,605 
                                
Stock-based compensation  61,068      838         838     838 
Cancellation of shares upon expiration of warrants  (1,437,500)                    
Rights Offering  1,454,545      3,863         3,863     3,863 
Issuance of detachable warrants        905         905     905 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests                   (253)  (253)
Loss on foreign currency translation, net              (1,124)  (1,124)    (1,124)
Net (loss) income           (16,688)     (16,688) 233   (16,455)
                                
Balance at December 31, 2016  25,050,628  $3  $37,384  $(27,763) $(1,544) $8,080 $(701) $7,379 
                                
Stock-based compensation  169,723      1,052         1,052     1,052 
Issuance of stock  1,750,000      2,183         2,183     2,183 
Issuance of detachable warrants        388         388     388 
Vesting of restricted shares  181,750                     
Distributions to noncontrolling interests                   (409)  (409)
Loss on foreign currency translation, net              (12)  (12)    (12)
Net (loss) income           (4,216)     (4,216) 188   (4,028)
                                
Balance at December 31, 2017  27,152,101  $3  $41,007  $(31,979) $(1,556) $7,475 $(922) $6,553 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

F-8


THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Operating activities:

 

  

 

  

Net (loss) income

$

(13,623)

$

21,133

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

  

 

  

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,114

 

5,404

Stock-based compensation

 

1,773

 

1,306

Bargain purchase gain

(10,963)

Loss on early debt extinguishment

 

 

858

Amortization of discount on warrants and debt issuance costs

 

479

 

233

Deferred taxes

 

(5,475)

 

(11,757)

Loss on impairment of investments

2,684

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Accounts receivable

 

4,378

 

(2,385)

Inventory

 

568

 

(541)

Other current assets

 

(301)

 

1,042

Due from related parties, net

 

(35)

 

(296)

Security deposits

 

405

 

767

Other assets

 

(826)

 

(440)

Accounts payable

 

(939)

 

926

Accrued expenses

 

4,468

 

(438)

Operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets

848

589

Deferred revenue

 

(1,403)

 

238

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

431

 

8,360

 

  

 

  

Investing activities:

 

  

 

  

Acquisition related payments, net of cash acquired

(26,040)

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(5,787)

 

(4,357)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(5,787)

 

(30,397)

Financing activities:

 

  

 

  

Proceeds from CARES Act Loans

 

18,314

 

Borrowings of long-term debt

 

 

64,750

Repayments of long-term debt

(752)

(28,517)

Debt issuance costs

(50)

(2,864)

Exercise of stock options

 

38

 

92

Tax-withholding obligation on stock based compensation

(126)

(88)

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

(252)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

17,424

 

33,121

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(27)

 

(332)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

12,041

 

10,752

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

12,344

 

1,592

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

$

24,385

$

12,344

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow data:

 

  

 

  

Interest paid

$

3,925

$

1,743

Income taxes paid

 

286

 

467

Non-cash property and equipment additions

$

303

$

165

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Operating activities:        
Net loss $(4,028) $(16,455)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  3,051   2,647 
Amortization of discount on warrants  197   71 
Deferred rent  830   1,881 
Deferred taxes  (25)  10,043 
Income from equity method investments  (168)  (674)
Derivative income     (100)
Stock-based compensation  1,052   838 
Impairments  559   96 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (684)  (826)
Inventory  (94)  (157)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  443   1,731 
Due from related parties, net  

662

   812 
Security deposits  169   209 
Other assets  262   190 
Accounts payable  1,627   908 
Accrued expenses  1,631   359 
Deferred revenue  503   529 
Net cash provided by operating activities  

5,987

   2,102 
         
Investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (4,610)  (10,610)
Distribution from equity investment  276   519 
Net cash used in investing activities  (4,334)  (10,091)
         
Financing activities:        
Proceeds from term promissory notes     6,250 
Proceeds from business loan and security agreement  1,000    
Repayment of term loan  (2,828)  (2,495)
Repayment of equipment financing agreement  (334)  (226)
Repayment of business loan and security agreement  (938)   
Proceeds from rights offering     3,863 
Issuance of common stock  2,183    
Issuance of warrants  388    
Proceeds from liquidating trust     1,197 
Distributions to non-controlling interests  (409)  (253)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (938)  8,336 
         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (85)  (297)
         
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  630   50 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  918   868 
         
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $1,548  $918 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow data:        
Interest paid $1,180  $856 
Income taxes paid $99  $112 
         
Noncash investing and financing activities:        
Noncash property, fixtures and equipment additions from equipment financing $  $991 
Noncash debt issuance costs $35  $ 
Noncash discount on detachable warrants $  $905 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.statements.

F-6

F-9


THE ONE GROUP HOSPITALITY, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Description of Business

The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a global hospitality company that develops, owns and operates, manages and manageslicenses upscale and polished casual, high-energy restaurants and lounges. The Company’s primary restaurant brand is STK, a multi-unit steakhouse concept that combines a high-energy, social atmosphere with the quality foodlounges and service of a traditional upscale steakhouse. As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned, operated or managed eighteen venues across seven states and six countries.

The Company also provides turn-key food and beverage (“F&B”) services for hospitality venues including hotels, casinos and other high-end locations. Turn-key F&B services are food and beverage services that can be scaled, customized and implemented by the Company at a particular hospitality venue and customized per the requirements offor the client. The Company’s primary restaurant brands are STK, a multi-unit steakhouse concept that combines a high-energy, social atmosphere with the quality and service of a traditional upscale steakhouse, and Kona Grill, a polished casual bar-centric grill concept featuring American favorites, award-winning sushi, and specialty cocktails in a polished casual atmosphere.

As of December 31, 2017, under various management agreements,2020, the Company services thirteenowned, operated, managed or licensed 54 venues throughoutincluding 20 STKs and 24 Kona Grills in major metropolitan cities in North America, Europe and the Middle East and 10 F&B venues in five hotels and casinos in the United States and Europe. In January 2021, we opened a managed STK restaurant in Europe.Scottsdale, Arizona. For those restaurants and venues that are managed or licensed, we generate management fees based on top-line revenues and incentive fee revenue based on a percentage of the location’s revenues and net profits.

On October 4, 2019, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Kona Grill Inc. and its affiliates (“Kona Grill”), which was composed of 24 domestic restaurants. The Company purchased the assets for a contractual price of $25.0 million plus approximately $1.5 million of consideration paid primarily for the apportionment of rent and utilities. The Company also assumed approximately $7.7 million in current liabilities. The Company has integrated Kona Grill by leveraging its corporate infrastructure, hospitality business knowledge and unique Vibe Dining program, elevating the brand experience and driving improved performance. The results of operations of these restaurants are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

COVID-19

The novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic has significantly impacted the Company’s business, and public concerns about the spread of COVID-19 continue to be widespread. The Company experienced a significant reduction in guest traffic at its restaurants as a result of restrictions mandated by state and local governments and temporary closure of several restaurants and the shift in operations to provide only take-out and delivery service. Starting in May 2020, state and local governments began easing restrictions on stay-at-home orders; however, certain states have reimposed restrictions as COVID-19 cases increased during the fall of 2020. Currently, all domestic Company-owned restaurants are open for outdoor dining or in-person dining with seating capacity restrictions. Certain of the Company’s managed and licensed venues internationally are temporarily closed or on to-go/delivery only due to COVID-19. The Company has taken significant steps to adapt its business to increase sales while providing a safe environment for guests and employees.

In response to these conditions, and out of concern for its customers and partners, the Company has implemented enhanced safety measures and sanitation procedures to allow for in-person dining at its restaurants. As the Company navigates through the pandemic, it has also implemented measures to reduce its costs including the deferral of capital projects and negotiations with suppliers and landlords regarding deferral or abatement of payments.

Given the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company cannot reasonably predict when its restaurants will be able to return to normal dining room operations. The Company expects that its results of operations could be materially and negatively affected by COVID-19 in 2021. The Company’s resumption of normal dining operations is subject to events beyond its control, including the effectiveness of governmental efforts to halt the spread of COVID-19.

F-10


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial results of Kona Grill have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition on October 4, 2019.

The Company consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest, the usual condition of which is ownership of a majority voting interest. The Company also considers for consolidation an entity in which it has certain interests, where the controlling financial interest may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests. Such an entity, known as a variable interest entity (“VIE”), is required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that possesses the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that are significant to it. The principal entities in which the Company possesses a variable interest include its equity method investees.

The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances occurs that may have a significant adverse impact on the fair value of the investment. If a loss in value has occurred and is deemed to be other than temporary, an impairment loss is recorded. Several factors are reviewed to determine whether a loss has occurred that is other than temporary, including the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the length and extent of the fair value decline, and the financial condition and future prospects of the investee. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a non-cash write down of $2.7 million related to its investments. Refer to Note 9 – Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities for additional information regarding the Company’s investments and related impairment.

Prior Period Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of the 2019 amounts in the accrued expenses and segment reporting footnotes have been made to conform prior period information to the current year presentation. The reclassifications did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions for the reporting period and as of the reporting date. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Business Combination

On October 4, 2019, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of Kona Grill, which was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Standard Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations. Acquired assets and assumed liabilities were assigned fair values based on widely accepted valuation techniques, in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The process for estimating fair values in many cases requires the use of significant estimates, assumptions and judgments, including determining the timing and estimates of future cash flows and developing appropriate discount rates. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of the Company’s fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined asrepresents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Assets and liabilities are valued based upon observable and non-observable inputs. Valuations using Level 1 inputs are based on unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. GAAP requires fair valueLevel 2 inputs utilize significant other observable inputs available at the measurement todate, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly. Valuations using Level 3

F-11


inputs are based on significant unobservable inputs that cannot be classifiedcorroborated by observable market data and disclosed in onereflect the use of the following three categories:significant management judgment. There were no significant transfers between levels during any period presented.

·Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
·Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
·Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

F-7

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand and highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and at the restaurants as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

Accounts Receivable

The majority of the Company’s receivables arise primarily from credit cards, management agreements, trade customers and other reimbursable amounts due from hotel operators where the Company operates a food and beverage service. The Company determines an allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, previous loss and payment history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company and the condition of the general economy and industry as a whole. The Company has not reserved any trade receivables as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

Inventory

Inventories, which consist of food, liquor and other beverages, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first in, first out method. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs to sell. The Company has not reserved any inventory as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.

Property and Equipment

2019.

Property and Equipment

Additions to property and equipment, (includingincluding leasehold improvements)improvements, are statedrecorded at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their useful lives or the non-cancelable lease term. In circumstances where failure to exercise a renewal option would result in the Company incurring an economic penalty, those option periods are included when determining the depreciation period. In either case, the Company’s policy requires consistency when calculating the depreciation period, in classifying the lease and in computing straight-line rent expense. Costs incurred to repair and maintain the Company’s operations and equipment are expensed as incurred. The estimated useful lives used for financial statement purposes are:

Computer and equipment5-7 years
Furniture and fixtures5-7 years

Restaurant smallwares are capitalized during the initial year of operation of a particular restaurant. All restaurant supplies purchased subsequent to the first year are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss on retirements is reflected in operating income in the year of disposition.

After the asset has been placed into service, depreciation is based on the estimated useful life of the asset using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Computers and equipment as well as furniture and fixtures are depreciated over their useful lives from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the remaining term of the associated lease. Lease terms begin on the date the Company takes possession under the lease and include option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty.

Other Assets

Other assets include liquor license acquisition costs and costs to fulfill obligations under the Company’s management and license agreements. The gross carrying amount of the contract costs related to management and license agreements was $0.5 million and $0 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the “Kona Grill” trade name. The “Kona Grill” tradename is amortized using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life of 20 years. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the gross carrying amount of the tradename intangible was $17.4 million. The accumulated amortization of the tradename was $1.1 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and the amortization expense was $0.9 million and $0.2 million for the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company’s estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is approximately $0.9 million annually.

F-12


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of long-livedthese assets may not be fully recoverable. The impairment evaluation is generally performed at the individual venue asset group level. Recoverability of restaurant assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an individual venue’srestaurant’s assets to the estimated identifiable undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by those restaurant assets. If the carrying amount of an individual venue’s long-livedrestaurant’s assets exceeds its estimated, identifiable, undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assetsasset exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined by discounting a venue’srestaurant’s identifiable future cash flows. The Company determined that there were impairments, net of related liabilities, of $0.6 million and $0.1 million for

For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.2019, the Company did not identify any event or changes in circumstances that indicated that the carrying values of its restaurant assets were impaired.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are capitalized and amortized to interest expense based on the term of the related debt agreement using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. The Company has recorded debt issuance costs as an offset to long termlong-term debt, net of current portion on the consolidated balance sheets.

F-8

Income Taxes

The Company computes income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes, using the enacted statutory rate in effect for the year these differences are expected to be taxable or refunded. Deferred income tax expenses or credits are based on the changes in the asset or liability, respectively, from period to period. A deferred tax asset or liability is recognized whenever there are future tax effects from existing temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.carry-forwards. If the Company determines that a deferred tax asset or liability could be realized in a greater or lesser amount than recorded, the asset’s recorded amountdeferred tax asset or liability is adjusted and a corresponding adjustment is made to the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statementstatements of operations is either credited or charged, respectively,and comprehensive income in the period during which the determination is made.

The Company reduces its deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if it determines that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of these tax assets will not be realized. In making this determination, the Company considers various qualitative and quantitative factors, such as:

·the level of historical taxable income;
·the projection of future taxable income over periods in which the deferred tax assets would be deductible;
·events within the restaurant industry;
·the health of the economy; and,
·historical trending.

In 2016,As of December 31, 2019, the Company established areleased approximately $10.3 million of its valuation allowance based on an assessment of the realizability of its deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2020, the remaining valuation allowance of $12.0$0.3 million on its deferredrelates to foreign tax assetscredits the Company does not expect to utilize as a result of accumulated losses (excluding derivative income) incurred forgenerating income in a jurisdiction with a higher income tax rate than the three-year period ended December 31, 2016U.S. The recording of deferred taxes requires significant management judgment regarding the interpretation of applicable statutes, the status of various income tax audits, and the Company’s belief that it was more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets in the United States may not fully be realized in the future. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had a valuation allowance of approximately $11.6 million established against its deferred tax assets.

particular facts and circumstances.

The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it determines that it is more-likely-than-not that the position would be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. If the Company derecognizes an uncertain tax position, the Company’s policy is to record any applicable interest and penalties within the (benefit) provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.income.

F-13


Revenue Recognition

Revenue is derived from restaurant sales, management services and license related operations.

The Company recognizes restaurant revenues, net of discounts, when goods and services are provided. Sales tax amounts collected from customers that are remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from net revenue.

Revenue for management services are recognized when services are performed and fees are earned. The Company’s managementManagement agreements typically call for a management fee based on a percentage of revenue, a monthly marketing fee based on a percentage of revenues and an incentive fee based on a managed venue’s net profits.

Initial fees collected Similarly, royalties from the licensee in license agreements are generally based on a licensed operator to establish a new location are recognized as income over the lifepercentage of the relatedlicensed restaurant’s revenue. These management, license agreement. In cases where initial licenseand incentive fees are tied to specific performance obligations for which the Company is obligated to perform, such as preopening training and opening dates, the Company will record the revenue at the time the obligation is met. Royalties are recognized as revenue in the period the managedrestaurant’s sales occur.

The Company recognizes initial licensing fees and upfront fees related to management and license agreements on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement as a component of management, license and incentive fee revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The Company has a loyalty program for Kona Grill to encourage customers to frequent its restaurants. The loyalty rewards program awards a customer one point for every dollar spent. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are converted to a reward and redeemed, or licensed location’s revenues are earned. Royalties from the licensee arelikelihood of redemption is remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis, based on the stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty points terms. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019 the deferred revenue allocated to loyalty points that have not been redeemed is $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, which is recorded as a percentagecomponent of accrued expenses in the licensed restaurant’s revenue.accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company expects the loyalty points to be redeemed and recognized over a one-year period.

Gift Certificates

Cards

Proceeds from the sale of gift certificatescards are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as revenue when redeemed by the holder. There are no expiration dates on the Company’s gift certificatescards and the Company does not charge any service fees that would result in a decrease to a customer’s available balance.

Although the Company will continue to honor all gift certificatescards presented for payment, it may determine the likelihood of redemption to be remote for certain gift certificatescards due to, among other things, long periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, to the extent the Company determines there is no requirement for remitting balances to government agencies under unclaimed property laws, outstanding gift certificatecard balances may then be recognized as breakage in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive lossincome as a component of owned unitrestaurant net revenues.

The Company recorded no revenue from gift card breakage forrevenue. For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019, the Company recognized $1.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in revenue from gift card breakage.

F-9

Pre-opening Costs

Pre-opening costs for Company owned restaurants are expensed as incurred prior to a restaurant opening for business. The Company recorded pre-opening costs of $3.4 million in 2017, of which $1.8 million was recorded as lease termination expenses and asset write-offs on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Pre-opening costs for 2016the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $6.0 million.$0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses the cost of advertising and promotions as incurred. Advertising expense amounted to $3.6$2.5 million and $3.2$3.1 million in 2017for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Leases

Leases and Deferred Rent

Contracts are evaluated to determine whether they contain a lease at inception. The Company’s contracts determined to be or contain a lease include explicitly or implicitly identified assets where the Company leases has the right to substantially

F-14


all of its restaurant properties under operating leases. The Company also leases equipment under operating leases.

For a lease that contains rent escalations, the Company recordseconomic benefits of the total rent payableassets and has the ability to direct how and for what purpose the assets are used during the lease termterm. Leases are classified as either operating or financing. If it is determined that the contract contains an operating lease, a right-of-use asset and operating lease liability are recorded on a straight-line basis over the expected termconsolidated balance sheets. A right-of-use asset represents the Company’s right to use the underlying asset and the lease liability represents the Company’s contractually obligated payments. Both the right-of-use asset and the lease liability are recognized as of the commencement date of the lease and recordsare based upon the difference between rent paid andpresent value of lease payments due over the straight-line rent expense as deferred rent payable. Rent expense is recognized when the Company obtains controlcourse of the leased property.lease. The expected termright-of-use asset is reduced by any lease incentives received and is adjusted for any prepayments. For leases that do not have a rate implicit in the lease, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the date of commencement is used to determine the present value of the lease includes optionalpayments. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is the rate of interest that it would have to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term on an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment.

The Company monitors for triggering events or conditions that require a reassessment of its leases. When the reassessment requires a re-measurement of the operating lease liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset. Additionally, the Company assesses its right-of-use assets for impairment in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment.

The Company has made an accounting policy election not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases with a lease term of 12 months or less, including renewal periodsoptions that are reasonably assuredcertain to be exercised, and where failurethat also do not include an option to exercise such renewal options would result in an economic penalty topurchase the Company. Incentiveunderlying asset that is reasonably certain of exercise. Instead, lease payments received from landlordsfor these leases are recordedrecognized as an increase to deferred rent payable and are amortizedlease cost on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Additionally, the Company has elected not to separate the accounting for lease components and non-lease components, for all leased assets. Given the importance of each of its restaurant locations to its operations, the Company has historically concluded that it was reasonably assured of exercising two renewal periods included in its leases as failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty.

The Company enters into contracts to lease office space, restaurant space and equipment with terms that expire at various dates through 2041, which includes exercise of options to extend the lease. Under ASC Topic 842, the lease term at the lease commencement date is determined based on the non-cancellable period for which the Company has the right to use the underlying asset, together with any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the Company is reasonably certain to exercise that option, periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if the Company is reasonably certain not to exercise that option, and periods covered by an option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease in which the exercise of the option is controlled by the lessor. The Company considered a number of factors when evaluating whether the options in its lease contracts were reasonably certain of exercise, such as length of time before option exercise, expected value of the leased asset at the end of the initial lease term, importance of the lease to overall operations, costs to negotiate a new lease, and any contractual or economic penalties.

Certain of the Company’s leases also provide for percentage rent, which are variable lease costs determined as a reductionpercentage of rent. Asgross sales in excess of December 31, 2017specified, minimum sales targets, as well as other lease costs to reimburse the lessor for real estate tax and 2016,insurance expenses, and certain non-lease components that transfer a distinct service to the Company, had $17.0 millionsuch as common area maintenance services. These percentage rents and $16.2 million, respectively,other variable lease costs are not included in the calculation of deferred rent payable, netlease payments when classifying a lease and in the measurement of landlord incentives.the lease liability as they do not meet the definition of in-substance, fixed-lease payments under ASC Topic 842.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company maintains an equity incentive compensation plan under which it may grant options, warrants, restricted stock or other stock-based awards to directors, officers, key employees and other key individuals performing services to the Company. Restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are valued using the closing stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of an option award or warrant is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model which incorporates rangesrequires estimates of assumptions for inputs.the expected term of the option, the risk-free interest rate, future volatility and dividend yield. The Company’s assumptions are as follows:

·Expected Term – The expected term of options is based upon evaluations of historical and expected future exercise behavior with consideration of both the vesting period and contractual terms of the instruments.
·Risk Free Interest Rate – The risk-free rate interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected term at the grant date.

F-15


·Implied Volatility – Implied volatility is based upon an average of the volatilities of an industry peer group who are publicly traded.
·Dividend Yield – The Company has historically not paid dividends and does not plan to do so in the foreseeable future.

Under the plan, vesting of awards can either be based on the passage of time or on the achievement of performance goals. For awards that vest on the passage of time, compensation cost is recognized over the vesting period. For performance basedperformance-based awards, the Company will recognizerecognizes compensation costs over the requisite service period when conditions for achievement become probable. The Company also estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ. These estimates, which are currently at 10%, are based on historical forfeiture behavior exhibited by employees of the Company.

F-10

Net Income (Loss)Earnings per Common Share

Basic net incomeearnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period.period and income available to common stockholders. Diluted net incomeearnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of all potential common stock. Potentialshares of common stock consists of sharesincluding common stock issuable pursuant to stock options, warrants, and warrants. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, all equivalent shares underlying options and warrants were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as the Company was in a net loss position.

Net income (loss) per share accounts for continuing operations and discontinued operations are computed independently.RSUs. As a result, the sum of per share amount may not equal the total. Refer to Note 14 for the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share.

Segment Reporting

ConcentrationsIn the fourth quarter of Credit Risk

The2019, in conjunction with the Kona Grill acquisition, the Company maintains cashimplemented certain organizational changes, including the reorganization of our internal reporting structure to better facilitate its strategy for growth, operational efficiency and cash equivalent balances with financial institutions that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.management accountability. As a result of December 31, 2017,these organizational changes, the Company has $1.6 million of cash deposited that is in excess of federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses relatedidentified the following four reportable operating segments: STK, Kona Grill, ONE Hospitality and Corporate. Refer to these balancesNote 17 for additional details and management believes its credit risk to be minimal.

The Company’s accounts receivable balance includes credit card receivables. Management believes that concentrations of credit risk with respect to these credit card receivables are limited. Credit card receivables are anticipated to be collected within three business days of the transaction.

Segment Reporting

The Company operates in three segments: owned restaurants, owned food, beverage and other operations and managed and licensed operations. These reportable segments are supported bycertain financial information regarding the Company’s corporate unit. The Company’s owned restaurant segment consists of leased restaurant locations that compete in the full service dining industry and have similar investment criteria and economic and operating characteristics. The Company’s owned food, beverage and other operations segment includes entities where the Company leases a restaurant and provides additional ancillary food and beverage services, such as managing pool bars and providing full hospitality services for a hotel. The Company’s managed and licensed operations segment consists of management agreements in which the Company operates the food and beverage services in hotels or casinos and could include an STK, which the Company referssegments relating to as managed units. Revenues within the managed and licensed operations segment are generated from management fees based on the net revenue at each location, incentive fees based on profitability at each location and license fees. Information regarding the revenues and costs for each business segment has been reported in Note 19 for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. Prior year amounts have been revised to conform to the current year segment presentation.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average monthly exchange rates. Gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign subsidiaries represent other comprehensive income (loss) and are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Currency translation gains or (losses) are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders'stockholders’ equity and amounted to approximately $(12,000)$5,000 and $(1.1)($0.3) million during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) consists of two components: net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments. All of the Company’s foreign currency translation adjustments relate to wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014,June 2020, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in conjunction with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) developed Technical Question and Answer (“TQA”) 3200.18, “Borrower Accounting for a Forgivable Loan Received Under the Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program”, which is intended to provide clarification on how to account for loans received from the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). TQA 3200.18 states that an entity may account for PPP loans under ASC 470, “Debt” or, if the entity is expected to meet PPP eligibility criteria and the PPP loan is expected to be forgiven, the entity may account for the loans under IAS 20, “Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance”. Although the Company anticipates forgiveness of the entire amount of the CARES Act Loans, no assurances can be provided that the Company will obtain forgiveness of the CARES Act Loans in whole or in part. Therefore, the Company has elected to account for PPP loan proceeds under ASC 470 as allowed by TQA 3200.18.

F-16


In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards UpdateStandard Updated (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 606)740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,” (“ASU 2014-09”2019-12”) and has subsequently issued a number of clarifying amendmentswhich is intended to ASU 2014-09. The new standard, as amended, provides a single comprehensive modelsimplify various aspects related to be used in the accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customersincome taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Accounting Standard Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes, and supersedes current revenue recognitionit clarifies and amends existing guidance including industry-specific guidance.to improve consistent application. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from customer contracts, including significant judgments, changes in judgments and identification of assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-092019-12 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and provides for two methods of adoption: the full retrospective method, which requires the standard to be applied to each prior period presented, or the modified retrospective method, which requires the cumulative effect of adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption.2020. The Company plans to adoptis evaluating the requirementsimpact of ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective method. To prepare for the adoption of ASU 2014-09, the Company has:

F-11

·Identified its key revenue streams;
·Identified key factors from the five step process to recognize revenue as prescribed by ASU 2014-09 that may be applicable to each key revenue stream;
·Reviewed contracts within each key revenue stream to identify differences in the timing of recognizing revenues between current GAAP and ASU 2014-09; and
·Evaluated the Company’s historical accounting policies and practices to the requirements of ASU 2014-09.

The Company believes that the primary areas affected by ASU 2014-09 are revenues associated with licensing agreements and gift cards which in the aggregate accounted for less than 2% of total revenues in 2017. The Company concluded that2019-12 on its financial statements but does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

2019-12 to be material.

In February 2016,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”2018‑15, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350‑40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract” (“ASU 2016-02”2018‑15”). ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee2018‑15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in cloud computing arrangements with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to recognize on the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a corresponding right-of-use asset.develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2016-02 also requires certain disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-022018‑15 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early2019, with early adoption is permitted. The Company’s restaurants operate under lease agreements that provide for material future lease payments. These leases compriseEntities can choose to adopt the majority of the Company’s material lease agreements.new guidance prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this standard, but expects the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will2018-15 did not have a material effectimpact on its consolidatedthe Company’s financial statements by increasing both total assets and total liabilities.

position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In AugustJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments"326)” (“ASU 2016-15”2016-13”). ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes2016-13 requires companies to how cash receiptsmeasure credit losses utilizing a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and cash payments are presentedrequires a consideration of a broader range of reasonable and classified in the statement of cash flows.supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. ASU 2016-152016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does2022, and we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-152016-13 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 provides clarity and reduces complexity when an entity has changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award, and when an entity should apply modification accounting. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of ASU 2017-09 on its consolidated financial statements, but does not expect it to have a material impact.

be material.

Note 3 -– Business Combination

On October 4, 2019, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Kona Grill Inc. and its affiliates comprising 24 domestic restaurants. The Company purchased the assets for a contractual price of $25.0 million plus $1.5 million of consideration paid primarily for the apportionment of rent and utilities. The Company also assumed approximately $7.7 million in current liabilities. The Company believes that Kona Grill is complementary and enables the Company to capture market share in the Vibe Dining segment.

Kona Grill Inc. and its affiliates were purchased pursuant to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy. As a result, the Company recognized a bargain purchase gain of approximately $11.0 million in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2019, which represents the excess of the aggregate fair value of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed over the purchase price.

F-17


The purchase accounting represents estimates and assumptions that were subject to change during the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The following table summarizes the fair value of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (amounts in thousands):

Net assets acquired:

    

Cash

$

450

Current assets, excluding cash

2,830

Property and equipment

31,781

Operating lease right-of-use assets

42,398

Intangible assets

17,400

Other assets

692

Current liabilities

(7,690)

Deferred tax liability

 

(4,044)

Operating lease liabilities

 

(46,364)

Total net assets acquired

$

37,453

Purchase consideration:

Contractual purchase price

25,000

Apportionment of rent and utilities

775

Assumption of real estate lease consultant contract

465

Escrow deposit

 

250

Consideration paid

$

26,490

Bargain purchase gain attributable to Kona Grill acquisition

$

10,963

Pro Forma Results of Operations (unaudited)

The following pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 have been prepared as though the acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2019. The pro forma financial information is not indicative of the results of operations that the Company would have attained had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is the pro forma financial information indicative of the results of operations that may occur in the future. Amounts are in thousands, except earnings per share related data.

For the year ended

December 31,  2019

Total revenues

$

196,906

Net income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

10,789

Net income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. per share:

Basic net income per share

$

0.38

Diluted net income per share

$

0.36

Note 4 – Inventory

Inventory consists of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Beverages

$

1,439

$

1,832

Food

 

1,051

 

1,226

Total

$

2,490

$

3,058

  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Food $246  $209 
Beverages  1,156   1,100 
Total $1,402  $1,309 

F-18


Note 45 – Other Current Assets

Other current assets consistsconsist of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 

December 31, 

2020

2019

Prepaid expenses

$

1,174

$

624

Prepaid taxes

 

174

 

353

Other

 

 

70

Total

$

1,348

$

1,047

  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Prepaid taxes $255  $212 
Landlord receivable  258   679 
Prepaid expenses  421   538 
Other  365   314 
Total $1,299  $1,743 

F-12

Note 5 -6 – Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment, net consist of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 

December 31, 

2020

2019

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

$

22,328

$

20,512

Leasehold improvements

 

71,654

 

69,925

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(30,948)

 

(21,997)

Subtotal

 

63,034

 

68,440

Construction in progress

 

2,294

 

97

Restaurant smallwares

 

2,016

 

1,946

Total

$

67,344

$

70,483

  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment $10,073  $9,530 
Leasehold improvements  41,261   36,136 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (18,832)  (15,809)
   32,502   29,857 
Construction in progress  3,828   5,605 
Restaurant supplies  1,481   1,353 
Totals $37,811  $36,815 

Depreciation and amortization related to property and equipment amounted to $3.1$9.2 million and $2.6$5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The Company does not depreciate construction in progress, assets not yet put into service andor restaurant supplies. Furniture, fixtures and equipment includes $1.4 million and $0.7 million of assets not yet put into service or classified as held for sale atsmallwares.

For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.

In 2017,2019, the Company determineddid not identify any event or changes in circumstances that it would not open venues in Austin and Dallas, Texas. Accordingly,indicated that the Company wrote off gross fixedcarrying values of its restaurant assets of $0.6 million.were impaired.

In 2016, the Company closed STK Edinburgh and accordingly, wrote off $1.1 million in gross fixed assets and the related lease liabilities of $1.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $0.1 million.

Note 67 – Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consistsconsist of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 

December 31, 

2020

2019

Payroll and related(1)

$

4,860

 

$

4,519

Accrued lease exit costs(2)

4,144

 

1,411

Variable rent

1,883

 

545

VAT and sales taxes

 

1,119

1,488

Legal, professional and other services

462

1,103

Interest

474

2

Income taxes and related

547

Insurance

 

330

 

100

Other

 

2,412

 

1,483

Total

$

15,684

$

11,198


  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
VAT and Sales taxes $

739

  $1,386 
Payroll and related  847   731 
Income taxes  

610

   144 
Due to hotels  1,168   1,327 
Rent  1,471   321 
Legal, professional and other services  1,007   704 
Insurance  103   150 
Other  1,042   786 
Totals $6,987  $5,549 

(1)F-13Payroll and related includes $2.6 million in employer payroll taxes for which payment has been deferred under the CARES Act.
(2)Amount relates to lease exit costs for restaurants never built and still under dispute with landlords.

F-19


Note 7 -8 – Long Term Debt

Long termLong-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 

December 31, 

2020

2019

Term loan agreements

$

47,400

$

47,880

Revolving credit facility

Equipment financing agreements

 

108

 

380

Total long-term debt

 

47,508

 

48,260

Less: current portion of long-term debt

 

(588)

 

(749)

Less: debt issuance costs

 

(1,856)

 

(2,285)

Total long-term debt, net of current portion

$

45,064

$

45,226

  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Term Loan Agreements $6,657  $9,485 
Promissory Notes  6,250   6,250 
Equipment Financing Agreements  1,094   1,421 
Business Loan and Security Agreement  62    
   14,063   17,156 
Less: Current portion of Long Term Debt  (3,241)  (3,154)
Less: Discounts on warrants, net  (654)  (835)
Less: Debt Issuance Costs  (53)  (68)
Long Term Debt, net of Current Portion $10,115  $13,099 
         
Future minimum loan payments:        
2018 $3,241     
2019  3,197     
2020  1,268     
2021  6,357     
2022       
Total $14,063     

Bank United Term Loans

On December 17, 2014, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with BankUnited in the amount of $7.5 million (the “First Term Loan Agreement”), of which the proceeds were used to repay existing debt and fund additional Company growth and working capital needs.

The First Term Loan Agreement, which matures on December 1, 2019, bears interest at an annual rate of 5.0%. Beginning on January 1, 2015, the Company is required to make sixty consecutive monthly installment payments of $124,583 plus accrued interest towards the First Term Loan Agreement.

On June 2, 2015, the Company entered into a second term loan agreement with BankUnited, wherein BankUnited agreed to make multiple advances to the Company in the aggregate principal amount of up to $6.0 million (the "Second Term Loan Agreement").

The Second Term Loan Agreement, which matures on September 1, 2020, bears interest at an annual rate of 5.0%. Beginning on April 1, 2016, the Company is required to make fifty-four consecutive monthly installments, with each installment to be in the principal amount of the lesser of $111,111 or the quotient of (x) the outstanding principal amount of all advances on March 31, 2016, divided by (y) fifty-four (54); provided, however, that the final principal installment shall be in an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of all advances outstanding on September 1, 2020, or such earlier date on which all outstanding advances shall become due and payable, whether by acceleration or otherwise.

The First Term Loan Agreement and the Second Term Loan Agreement are secured by substantially of the Company’s assets. The First Term Loan Agreement and the Second Term Loan Agreement contain certain affirmative and negative covenants that limit or restrict, among other things, liens and encumbrances, indebtedness, mergers, asset sales, investments, assumptions and guaranties of indebtedness of other persons, change in nature of operations, changes in fiscal year and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The financial covenants contained in these agreements require the borrowers to maintain a certain adjusted tangible net worth and a debt service coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2017, the Company is in compliance with all of its financial covenants under the First Term Loan Agreement and the Second Term Loan Agreement.

F-14

Future minimum loan payments:

    

2021

$

588

2022

 

480

2023

 

480

2024

 

45,960

Total

$

47,508

At December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance under the First Term Loan Agreement and the Second Term Loan Agreement is $3.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively.

Promissory Notes

2235570 Ontario Limited

On June 27, 2016 the Company entered into a $1.0 million loan agreement with 2235570 Ontario Limited (“Ontario Noteholder”) through an unsecured promissory note (the “Ontario Note”). The Ontario Note bears interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, payable in quarterly installments beginning September 30, 2016. The entire balance of the Ontario Note is due on its maturity date of June 27, 2021. In connection with the issuance of the Ontario Note, the Company issued warrants to the Ontario Noteholder with a fair value of $0.1 million (See Note 14), which was recorded by the Company as a reduction to the principal balance of the Ontario Note and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Ontario Note. At December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding under the Ontario Note is $1.0 million. At December 31, 2017, there is $87,500 of unamortized discount related to the Ontario Warrant.

Anson Investments Master Fund LP

On August 11, 2016 the Company entered into a $3.0 million loan agreement with Anson Investments Master Fund LP (“Anson”) through an unsecured promissory note (the “Anson August Note”). The Anson August Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum, payable in quarterly installments beginning September 30, 2016. The entire balance of the Anson August Note is due on its maturity date of August 11, 2021. In connection with the issuance of the Anson August note, the Company issued warrants to Anson with a fair value of $0.4 million (See Note 14), which was recorded as a reduction to the principal balance of the Anson August Note and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Anson August Note. At December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding under the Anson August Note is $3.0 million. At December 31, 2017, there is $0.3 million of unamortized discount related to the Anson August Warrant.

On October 24, 2016, the Company entered into a $2.25 million loan agreement with Anson through an unsecured promissory note (the “Anson October Note”). The Anson October Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum, payable in quarterly installments beginning December 31, 2016. The entire balance of the Anson October Note is due on its maturity date of October 24, 2021. In connection with the issuance of the Anson October Note, the Company issued warrants to Anson with a fair value of $0.4 million (See Note 14), which was recorded as a reduction to the principal balance of the Anson October Note and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Anson October Note. At December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding under the Anson October Note is $2.25 million. At December 31, 2017, there is $0.3 million of unamortized discount related to the Anson October Warrant.

Equipment Financing Agreements

On June 5, 2015, the Company entered into a $1.0 million financing agreement with Sterling National Bank (“Sterling”) to purchase equipment for our STKs in Orlando and Chicago (the “First Sterling Agreement”). The First Sterling Agreement bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum, payable in equal monthly installments of $19,686 plus accrued interest beginning on July 1, 2015. The First Sterling Agreement is secured by the equipment purchased with the proceeds of the First Sterling Agreement. At December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding under the First Sterling Agreement is approximately $0.6 million.

On August 16, 2016, the Company entered into a $0.7 million financing agreement with Sterling to purchase equipment for STKs in San Diego, Denver and Orlando (the "Second Sterling Agreement"). The Second Sterling Agreement bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum, payable in equal monthly installments of $13,769 plus accrued interest beginning on September 1, 2016. The Second Sterling Agreement is secured by the equipment purchased with the proceeds of the Second Sterling Agreement. At December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding under the Second Sterling Agreement is approximately $0.5 million.

Business Loan and Security Agreement

On February 17, 2017, the Company entered into a financing agreement with American Express Bank, FSB (“American Express”) in the amount of $1.0 million (the “AMEX Agreement”). In consideration of the loan amount, the Company granted American Express a security interest in certain accounts receivable, as defined in the AMEX Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the AMEX Agreement, the Company has agreed to pay a loan fee equal to 3.5% of the original principal balance of the loan amount and a repayment rate of 6% of daily American Express credit card receipts pursuant to a repayment schedule as defined in the AMEX Agreement. The loan is subordinate to the agreements with BankUnited. The entire balance of the loan amount is due and payable 365 days after the initial loan distribution. At December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding under the AMEX Agreement is approximately $62,000.

F-15

Interest expense for all the Company’s debt arrangements, excluding the amortization of debt issuance costs and other discounts and fees, amounted to $1.0was approximately $4.4 million and $0.8$1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively. The Company capitalized interest of $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,2019, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, the Company had $1.4$1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in standby letters of credit outstanding for certain restaurants. TheseAs of December 31, 2019 the Company had $0.4 million of cash collateralized letters of credit, which are cash collateralized, are recorded as a component of security deposits on the consolidated balance sheetsheet.

Goldman Sachs Bank USA Credit and Guaranty Agreement

On October 4, 2019, in conjunction with the acquisition of Kona Grill, the Company entered into a credit and guaranty agreement with Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a secured revolving credit facility of $12.0 million and a $48.0 million term loan. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments, with the final payment due in October 2024. The revolving credit facility also matures in October 2024. Additionally, the Company’s consolidated adjusted EBITDA as defined by the Credit Agreement for determining covenant compliance includes pro forma adjustments for the annualization of the Kona Grill restaurant performance which includes results before the acquisition date.

On May 4, 2020, Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“GSB”), as administrative agent, collateral agent and lead arranger under the Credit Agreement, (1) consented to the CARES Act Loans described below and (2) agreed that the amount of the CARES Act Loans will not be counted toward the permitted amount of Consolidated Total Debt, as defined under the Credit Agreement, to the extent the amounts are retained as cash during the term of the CARES Act Loans in a segregated deposit account or used for purposes that are forgivable under the CARES Act, provided that the proceeds of the CARES Act Loans must be used only for “allowable uses” under the CARES Act (with at least 75% of the utilized proceeds to be used for purposes that result in the CARES Act Loans being eligible for forgiveness) or used for the repayment of the CARES Act Loans.

On May 8, 2020 and August 10, 2020, GSB and the Company and certain of its subsidiaries amended the Credit Agreement to:

Eliminate testing of the fixed charge coverage ratio for the balance of 2020 and 2021;
For the purpose of testing, replace maximum “Leverage Ratio” with maximum “Net Leverage Ratio”. The maximum Net Leverage Ratio is (i) 2.85 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2020, (ii) 3.60 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2020, (iii) 3.10 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter

F-20


ending March 31, 2021, (iv) 2.10 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021, and (v) 1.90 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021;
Reduce the maximum consolidated capital expenditures to $7,000,000 for 2020 and $7,000,000 for 2021; and
Require minimum “Consolidated Liquidity” of not less than $4,000,000 for the balance of 2020 and 2021 (from $1,500,000 for 2021).

A summary of the financial covenants under the Credit Agreement, as amended, is as follows:

The minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio is (i) eliminated for the balance of 2020 and 2021; and (ii) 1.50 to 1.00 as of any fiscal quarter thereafter;
A maximum consolidated Net Leverage Ratio of (i) 2.85 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2020, (ii) 3.60 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2020, (iii) 3.10 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2021, (iv) 2.10 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021, (v) 1.90 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021, and (vii) maximum consolidated Leverage Ratio of 1.50 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter thereafter. For purposes of calculating this ratio for the first four quarters, the agreement provides for a pro forma adjustment to reflect one full year of Kona Grill operations. In addition, the consolidated net leverage ratio reduces the Company’s debt by its cash and cash equivalents. The consolidated leverage ratio has no such reductions;
Maximum consolidated capital expenditures not to exceed (i) $7,000,000 in each of 2020 and 2021, and (ii) $8,000,000 in every fiscal year thereafter; and,
Minimum consolidated liquidity of not less than (i) $4,000,000 for the remainder of 2020 and 2021, and (ii) $1,500,000 at any time thereafter.

The Company’s ability to borrow under its revolving credit facility is dependent on several factors. The Company’s total borrowings cannot exceed a gross leverage incurrence multiple of (i) 2.25 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2017.2020, (ii) 2.00 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2021, (iii) 1.75 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2021, (iv) 1.70 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2021, (v) 1.65 to 1.00 as of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021, and (vi) 1.50 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, after giving effect to any new borrowings under the revolving credit facility, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents cannot exceed $4,000,000.

The Credit Agreement has several borrowing and interest rate options, including the following: (a) a LIBOR rate (or a comparable successor rate) subject to a 1.75% floor; or (b) a base rate equal to the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (iii) the LIBOR rate for a one-month period plus 1.00%, or (iv) 4.75%. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum using the applicable indices plus a varying interest rate margin of between 5.75% and 6.75% (for LIBOR rate loans) and 4.75% and 5.75% (for base rate loans). The Company’s weighted average interest rate on the borrowings under the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was 8.50% and 8.55%, respectively.

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and conditions to borrowing including customary affirmative and negative covenants, which include covenants that limit or restrict the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness and other obligations, grant liens to secure obligations, make investments, merge or consolidate, alter the organizational structure of the Company and its subsidiaries, and dispose of assets outside the ordinary course of business, in each case subject to customary exceptions for credit facilities of this size and type.

The Company and certain operating subsidiaries of the Company guarantee the obligations under the Credit Agreement, which also are secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The Company has incurred approximately $2.5 million of debt issuance costs related to the Credit Agreement, which were capitalized and are recorded as a direct deduction to the long-term debt, net of current portion, on the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2020, the Company was in compliance with the covenants required by the Credit Agreement.

F-21


Equipment Financing Agreements

On June 5, 2015 and August 16, 2016, the Company entered into financing agreements with Sterling National Bank for $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively, to purchase equipment for the STKs in Orlando, Chicago, San Diego, and Denver. Each of these financing agreements have five- year terms and bear interest at a rate of 5% per annum, payable in equal monthly installments.

CARES Act Loans

On May 4, 2020, two subsidiaries of the Company entered into promissory notes (“CARES Act Loans”) with BBVA USA under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) created by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). Repayment of the CARES Act Loans is guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”).The ONE Group, LLC received a loan of $9.8 million related to the operations of STK restaurants, and Kona Grill Acquisition, LLC received a loan of $8.5 million related to the operation of Kona Grill restaurants.

The CARES Act Loans are scheduled to mature on April 28, 2022 and have a 1.00% interest rate and are subject to the terms and conditions applicable to PPP loans. Among other terms, BBVA USA may declare a default of the CARES Act Loans if the SBA disputes the validity of the guaranty of indebtedness, if a material adverse change occurs in the Company’s financial condition, or if BBVA USA believes the prospect of repayment of the CARES Act Loans or performance of obligations under the promissory notes is impaired. On an event of default, BBVA USA may declare principal and unpaid interest immediately due and payable, and it may charge default interest of 10%.

The CARES Act Loans are eligible for forgiveness if the proceeds are used for qualified purposes within a specified period and if at least 60% is spent on payroll costs. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has used all of the proceeds from the CARES Act Loans for qualified purposes in accordance with the CARES Act and SBA regulations, and these funds have supported the re-opening of in person dining and the return of approximately 3,000 furloughed employees to work. The Company applied for forgiveness of the CARES Act Loans in February 2021. The Company anticipates forgiveness of the entire amount of the CARES Act Loans; however, no assurance can be provided that the Company will obtain forgiveness of the CARES Act Loans in whole or in part. Therefore, the Company has elected to classify the entire principal amount of the CARES Act Loans as debt on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. Principal and interest payments are expected to be repaid beginning in August 2021, ten months after the end of the covered period which was from April 2020 to October 2020.

Debt Extinguishment

On May 15, 2019, the Company entered into the Bank of America Credit Agreement, which was replaced with the Credit Agreement described above on October 4, 2019. The Bank of America Credit Agreement provided for a secured revolving credit facility of $10.0 million and a $10.0 million term loan. The term loan was payable in quarterly installments, with the final payment due in May 2024. The revolving credit facility also matured in May 2024. In conjunction with entering into the Bank of America Credit Agreement, the Company incurred $0.4 million of debt issuance costs. On October 4, 2019, the unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.4 million was recognized as a loss on early debt extinguishment on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income.

In conjunction with entering into the Bank of America Credit Agreement on May 15, 2019, the Company prepaid the outstanding debt balances to early extinguish the $2.6 million of outstanding term loans with BankUnited, the $5.3 million of outstanding promissory notes with Anson Investments Master Fund LP, and the $1.0 million outstanding promissory note with 2235570 Ontario Limited. The Company recognized a $0.4 million loss on early debt extinguishment on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, primarily caused by the recognition of the unamortized discounts related to warrants issued with the promissory notes and the recognition of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the debt extinguished. Additionally, the Company prepaid the $1.2 million of outstanding cash advances due to the TOG Liquidation Trust, a related party. Please refer to Note 10 for additional details on transactions with related parties.

F-22


Note 8 -9 – Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities

The Company’s equity method investments, for whichAs of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company has determined it is not the primary beneficiary, consist ofowned interests in the following companies, which directly or indirectly operate restaurants:

·31.24% interest in Bagatelle NY LA Investors, LLC (“Bagatelle Investors”)
·51.13% interest in Bagatelle Little West 12th, LLC (“Bagatelle NY”)
·43.33% interest in Bagatelle La Cienega, LLC (“Bagatelle LA”)
·10.00% interest in One 29 Park, LLC (“One 29 Park”)

Bagatelle Investors is a holding company that has interestsan interest in two restaurants, Bagatelle NY and Bagatelle LA. All threeNY. Both entities were formed in 2011. TheIn the second quarter of 2019, Bagatelle NY notified the Company hasthat it had no intent to renew its sublease with the Company for the restaurant space. As a result, the Company determined that it is notno longer had the primary beneficiary of these entities as it does not have the power to direct the day to day activities of these entities, but it is ableability to exercise significant influence over these entities. During the years ended December 31, 2017its investees, Bagatelle Investors and 2016,Bagatelle NY. On June 30, 2019, the Company provided no additional types of support to these entities than what was contractually required. The restaurant associatedrecorded its retained interests in Bagatelle Investors and Bagatelle NY as investments, with the Company’s investment in Bagatelle LA closed in 2016, at which timeinitial basis being the previous carrying amounts of the investments. Prior to June 30, 2019, the Company wrote off its investment in Bagatelle LA to $0.

One 29 Park, formed in 2009, operates a restaurant and manages the rooftop of a hotel located in New York, NY. Until the fourth quarter of 2017, the Companyhad accounted for its investmentinvestments in One 29 Parkthese entities under the equity method of accounting based on management’s assessment that it was not the primary beneficiary of these entities because it did not have the power to direct their day to day activities.

On December 31, 2019, the Company determined that, because of the short term remaining on the lease (November 2020) and current market conditions, it was unable to recover the carrying amount of the investments in Bagatelle Investors and Bagatelle NY. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash write down of $2.7 million related to its investments for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company did not have a carrying value of the investment in Bagatelle Investors or Bagatelle NY. Upon expiration of the lease in November 2020, the Company exited its contract with Bagatelle.

There was no equity in income of investee companies for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Additionally, the Company had significant influence over One 29 Park’s operations. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the majority ownership of One 29 Park changed. As a result of this ownership change, the Company believes that it no longer has significant influence over the operations of One 29 Park. The Company did not record any income or losses during the fourth quarter of 2017 related to One 29 Park as it now accounts for its investment in One 29 Park under the cost method. No dividends or distributions were received from One 29 Park in 2017. In March 2018, the Company entered into anmanagement agreement to sell its 10% interest in One 29 Park to the new ownership group for $0.6 million.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying values of these investments were (in thousands):

  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Bagatelle Investors $33  $7 
Bagatelle NY  2,509   2,553 
Bagatelle LA      
One 29 Park  415   506 
Totals $2,957  $3,066 
         
Equity in income of investee companies $168  $674 

The Company has entered into management agreements with Bagatelle NY and Bagatelle LA (the “Bagatelle Entities”) and One 29 Park. For the Bagatelle Entities,NY. Under this agreement, the Company recorded management fee revenue of $0.2less than $0.1 million and $0.3$0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively. For One 29 Park, the Company recorded management fee revenue of $0.5 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,2019, respectively. The Company receivesalso received rental income from Bagatelle NY for restaurant space that it subleasessubleased to Bagatelle NY. Rental income of $0.5 million and $0.5 million was recorded from this entity for each of the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

F-16

ReceivablesNet receivables from the Bagatelle Entities and One 29 Park of $0.1 million and $0.5 million are included in due to related parties, net on the December 31, 2017 consolidated balance sheet and in due from related parties, net on the 2016 consolidated balance sheet.were approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. These receivables combined with the Company’s equity in each of these investments, represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss. The Company has provided no additional types of support to these entities other than what is contractually required.

Summarized financial data for these investments is presented below (in thousands):

For the Year ended December 31, 2017
  Bagatelle
Investors
  Bagatelle
NY
  Bagatelle
LA
  One 29
Park*
 
             
Revenues $  $13,641  $  $5,093 
Gross profit $  $9,826  $  $3,969 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $85  $504  $  $(875)
Net income (loss) $85  $504  $  $(875)

* For the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

For the Year ended December 31, 2016
  Bagatelle
Investors
  Bagatelle
NY
  Bagatelle
LA
  One 29
Park
 
             
Revenues $  $13,570  $1,080  $8,419 
Gross profit $  $10,147  $815  $6,730 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $209  $1,507  $(502) $(384)
Net income (loss) $209  $1,507  $(502) $(388)

Note 9 -10 – Related Party Transactions

Net amounts due tofrom related parties amounted to $1.5were $0.4 million and $0.8$0.3 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.The Company has not reserved $0 and $0.2 million ofany related party receivables as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively. The Company wrote off related party receivables of $0.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.

In 2016, the Company incurred approximately $57,000 for design services by an entity owned by one of the Company’s stockholders. Included in due from related parties, net at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is a balance due to this entity of approximately $9,500 and $22,000, respectively.

The Company incurred legal fees of approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, to an entity owned by one of its stockholders, who is also a former director of the Company. The Company also receives rental income for an office space subleased to this entity. Rental income of $0.2 million was recorded from this entity for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Included in due from related parties, net at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is a balance due to this entity of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

The Company incurred approximately $1.7 million and $5.9 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, for construction services to an entity owned by family members of one of the Company’s stockholders, who is also a former employee of the Company. Construction related deposits of $0.3 million paid to this entity were included in other current assets as of December 31, 2016. The balance of these deposits was $0 as of December 31, 2017. Included in due from related parties, net at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is a balance due to this entity of approximately $27,000 and $11,000, respectively.

2019.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company received approximately $1.2 million in cash advances from the TOG Liquidation Trust (the “Liquidation Trust”). Included in due to related parties, long term at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is a balance due to the Liquidation Trust of $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively.Trust. The TOG Liquidation Trust is a trust that was set up in connection with a 2013 merger transaction to hold previously issued and outstanding warrants held by members of the predecessor company. When warrants were exercised, the cash proceeds from the exercise of the warrants remained in the Trust. Amounts due to the trust arewere non-interest bearing and arewere repayable in 2021 when the trust expires. PleaseIn conjunction with entering into the Bank of America Credit Agreement on May 15, 2019, the Company prepaid the $1.2 million balance due to the TOG Liquidation Trust. As a result of the prepayment, there was no amount outstanding to the TOG Liquidation Trust as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Refer to Note 9 for details on other transactions with other related parties and refer to Note 8 for details on other transactions with related parties.to the Bank of America Credit Agreement.

F-23


F-17

Note 10 -11 – Income Taxes

The components of "lossincome before benefit for income taxes" for the periodstaxes were as follows (in thousands):

For the years ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Domestic

$

(19,129)

$

7,780

Foreign

 

106

 

2,199

Total

$

(19,023)

$

9,979

  Year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes        
Domestic $(6,532) $(5,768)
Foreign  2,707   (225)
Total $(3,825) $(5,993)

The components of the Company’s (benefit) provision for income tax provision aretaxes were as follows:follows (in thousands):

For the years ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Current:

 

  

 

  

Federal

$

$

State and local

 

39

 

109

Foreign

 

36

 

546

Total current

 

75

 

655

Deferred:

 

  

 

  

Federal

 

(4,593)

 

(9,242)

State and local

 

(887)

 

(2,600)

Foreign

 

5

 

33

Total deferred

 

(5,475)

 

(11,809)

Total benefit for income taxes

$

(5,400)

$

(11,154)

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Current        
Federal $  $ 
State and local  38   62 
Foreign  580   260 
Total current income tax provision  618   322 
Deferred        
Federal     7,654 
State and local     2,394 
Foreign  (18)   
Total deferred tax provision  (18)  10,048 
Total income tax provision $600  $10,370 

The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory rates as follows:

For the years ended December 31, 

 

    

2020

    

2019

Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate

 

21.0 %

21.0 %

State and local taxes

 

4.4 %

0.6 %

FICA tip credit

 

5.3 %

(10.5)%

Foreign rate differential

 

(0.8)%

Change in valuation allowance

 

0.9%

(103.0)%

Global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”)

 

3.9 %

Bargain purchase gain

(23.1)%

Other items, net

 

(3.2)%

0.1 %

Effective income tax rate

 

28.4 %

(111.8)%

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate  34.0%  34.0%

State and local taxes – current

  (0.6)%  (0.5)%
State and local taxes – deferred  

13.4

%  12.5%
FICA tip credit  16.9%  7.2%
Foreign rate differential  8.6%  0.7%
Foreign tax - unrepatriated earnings  %  (13.1)%
Change in valuation allowance  (87.4)%  (200.7)%
Other items, net  

(0.6

)%  (13.1)%
Total income tax expense  (15.7)%  (173.0)%

F-18

F-24


The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

For the years ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Deferred tax assets:

 

  

 

  

Deferred rent liabilities

$

2,647

$

2,502

Lease incentives

 

2,227

 

2,088

Stock compensation

 

439

 

401

FICA tip credit carryforward

 

6,860

 

5,575

Net operating loss

 

6,167

 

3,496

Goodwill

 

1,283

 

1,427

Inventory

 

23

 

6

Charitable contributions carryforward

 

2

 

Foreign tax credit carryforward

 

336

 

510

Deferred revenue

 

321

 

373

State and local tax credit carryforward

 

299

 

420

Expenses not deductible until paid

 

985

 

306

Basis in LLC interest

175

173

IRC 163(j) disallowed interest carryforward

835

Kona related acquisition costs

201

Deferred payroll taxes

703

Total deferred tax assets

 

23,503

 

17,277

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Depreciation and amortization

 

(9,812)

 

(8,835)

ASC 740‑10 liability

 

(129)

 

(181)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(9,941)

 

(9,016)

Valuation allowance

 

(336)

(510)

Net deferred tax assets

$

13,226

$

7,751

  At December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Deferred tax assets:        
Deferred rent liabilities $2,637  $3,744 
Lease incentives  1,484   1,566 
Stock compensation  458   745 
FICA tip credit carryforward  3,224   2,066 
Net operating loss  

5,129

   6,246 
Goodwill  1,839   2,862 
Inventory  13   10 
Charitable contributions carryforward  37   30 
Foreign tax credit carryforward  566   384 
Deferred revenue  383   478 
State and local tax credit carryforward  346   306 
         
Total deferred tax assets  

16,116

   18,437 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Depreciation and amortization  (3,661)  (5,321)
Basis in LLC interest  (592)  (20)
Unremitted foreign earnings     (785)
ASC 740-10 liability  (233)  (230)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (4,486)  (6,356)
         
Valuation allowance  (11,561)  (12,030)
         
Net deferred tax assets $69  $51 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company has federal and state income tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $19.1 million and $14.7 million, respectively.$23.7 million. The federalCompany has various state NOL carryforwards. The determination of the state NOL carryforwards is dependent upon apportionment percentages and state laws that can change from year to year and impact the amount of such carryforwards. Federal NOLs willof $16.0 million expire at various dates from 20332035 to 2037.2037, while the remaining $7.7 million have no expiration date. The state NOLs expire at various dates from 2035 to 2039. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company evaluates whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In the assessment of the valuation allowance, appropriate consideration was given to all positive and negative evidence including current operating results, tax planning strategies and forecasts of future earnings.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company released approximately $10.3 million of the valuation allowance based on an assessment of the realizability of its deferred tax assets, resulting in a benefit for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2019. The remaining valuation allowance of $0.3 million and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, relates to foreign tax credits the Company does not expect to utilize as a result of generating income in a jurisdiction with a higher income tax rate than the U.S.

Uncertain tax positions

The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s uncertain tax positions (in thousands):

For the years ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Balance, beginning of year

$

814

$

807

Increase related to current year positions

 

209

 

209

Decrease related to prior period positions

 

(209)

 

(202)

Balance, end of year

$

814

$

814

  Year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Balance, beginning of year $674  $ 
Increase related to prior period positions     492 
Increase related to current year positions  203   182 
Decrease related to prior period positions  (192)   
Balance, end of year  685   674 

F-25


The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and the various states and local jurisdictions in which it operates. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. The Company’s federal tax filings remain subject to examination for federal tax years 20142017 through 2016.2019. The IRS startedconducted an examination into tax year 2015 and so far hasdid not proposedpropose any changes. The Company will continue to monitor the impact this examination has on its financials. The Company’s state and local tax filings remain subject to examination for tax years 20142017 through 2016.

F-19

2019. NOL carryforwards are subject to examination regardless of whether the tax year in which they are generated has been closed by statute. The amount subject to disallowance is limited to the NOL utilized. Accordingly, the Company may be subject to examination for prior NOL’s generated as such NOL’s are utilized.

The Company’s foreign income tax returns prior to fiscal year 20152017 are closed and management continually evaluates expiring statutes of limitations, audits, proposed settlements, changes in tax law and new authoritative rulings.

2017 Tax ActNote 12 – Revenue recognition

In December 2017,The following table provides information about contract receivables and liabilities from contracts with customers, which include deferred license revenue, deferred gift card revenue and the President signed The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), which includes a broad range of provisions. Changes in tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment, and as a result, the 2017 consolidated financial statements reflect the immediate tax effect of the TCJA. The TCJA contains several key provisions including:Konavore rewards program (in thousands):

    

December 31, 

    

December 31, 

2020

2019

Receivables (1)

$

125

$

250

Deferred license revenue (2)

 

1,160

 

1,368

Deferred gift card and gift certificate revenue (3)

1,945

3,210

Konavore rewards program (4)

$

102

$

84


(1)·A one-time taxReceivables are included in accounts receivable on the mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 untaxed foreign earnings and profits (“E&P”);consolidated balance sheets.
(2)·A reduction inIncludes the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017;current and long-term portion of deferred license revenue.
(3)·The introduction of a new U.S. taxDeferred gift card revenue is included in deferred gift card revenue and other on certain off-shore earnings referred to as Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) at an effective tax rate of 10.5% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 (increasing to 13.125% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025) partially offset by foreign tax credits; andthe consolidated balance sheets.
(4)·Introduction of a territorial tax system beginningKonavore rewards program is included in 2018 by providing for a 100% dividend received deductionaccrued expenses on certain qualified dividends from foreign subsidiaries.the consolidated balance sheets.

Pursuant to the TCJA, the Company recorded the following adjustments to income tax expense during the fourth quarter of 2017:

·A one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings & profits amounted to $1.9 million. No tax liability was recorded due to the available net operating loss carryforwards. This resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction in valuation allowance of $0.8 million; and
·A reduction of net deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance of $2.9 million, primarily for the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets at the newly enacted tax rate of 21%.

The TCJA imposes a one-time mandatory transition tax on accumulated foreign earningsSignificant changes in deferred license revenue and eliminates U.S. taxes on foreign subsidiary distributions. As a result, earnings in foreign jurisdictions are available for distribution to the U.S. without incremental U.S. taxes. To the extent the Company repatriates these earnings, it estimates that it will not incur significant additional taxes related to such amounts, however the estimates are provisional and subject to further analysis.

Due to the complexities involved in accountingdeferred gift card revenue for the enactment of the TCJA, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 allows companies to record provisional estimates of the impacts of the TCJA during a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date. In order to estimate the impact of the one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings, the Company used the retained earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as a proxy to calculate E&P for the 2017 tax provision. While retained earnings and E&P are two separate and distinct calculations, the Company believes that retained earnings can initially be used as a relatively accurate proxy for E&P. The Company believes that typical E&P adjustments for items such as depreciation, certain reserves and tax exempt income and other permanent nondeductible expenses for E&P are either immaterial or nonexistent. Therefore, in the absence of a formal E&P analysis, retained earnings was considered to be a reasonable estimate. As ofyears ended December 31, 2017, the net retained earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries was $1.9 million. The company will conduct a comprehensive E&P analysis prior to the filing of its 2017 tax return. Only after the completion of the E&P study will the Company be able to determine with certainty the tax impact of the deemed repatriation provision of the TCJA. Any adjustment resulting from the E&P analysis will be included2020 and 2019 are as a tax adjustment to continuing operations in 2018.

Note 11 – Derivative Income

In 2013, in connection with a merger transaction, the Company issued warrants to purchase 5.8 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. These warrants expired on February 27, 2016, at which time the Company recorded derivative income related to unexercised warrants of $0.1 million.

follows (in thousands):

F-20

    

December 31, 

    

December 31, 

2020

2019

Revenue recognized from deferred license revenue

$

206

$

483

Revenue recognized from deferred gift card revenue

 

1,904

 

2,145

Deferred gift card revenue acquired in Kona Grill acquisition

$

$

2,277

Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies

Operating leases

The Company leases office space, restaurant space and certain equipment under operating leases having terms that expire at various dates through 2036. The restaurant leases have renewal clauses of 1 to 5 years at the Company’s option. Some of the Company’s leases also have provisions for contingent rent based upon a percentage of gross sales, as defined in the leases. Rent expense for 2017 and 2016 (inclusive of contingent rent of $1.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively) was $9.5 million and $9.0 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the estimated deferred license revenue to be recognized in the future minimum rental payments under operating leasesrelated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of December 31, 2020 were as follows for each year ending (in thousands):

2021

    

$

207

2022

 

180

2023

 

169

2024

 

134

2025

 

133

Thereafter

 

337

Total future estimated deferred license revenue

$

1,160

F-26


Note 13 – Leases

The Company subleases portions of its office and restaurant space where it does not use the entire space for its operations. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, sublease income was $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of which $0.5 million was from related party, Bagatelle NY. Refer to Note 9 and Note 10 for details on transactions with this related party.

The components of lease expense for the period were as follows (in thousands):

Year ending December 31, Payments 
2018 $7,535 
2019  7,613 
2020  7,854 
2021  7,377 
2022  7,021 
Thereafter  82,662 
Total $120,062 

December 31, 

December 31, 

2020

2019

Lease cost

Operating lease cost

 

$

11,613

 

$

8,494

Variable lease cost

2,001

3,185

Short-term lease cost

479

446

Sublease income

(493)

(696)

Total lease cost

 

$

13,600

 

$

11,429

Weighted average remaining lease term – operating leases

12 years

13 years

Weighted average discount rate – operating leases

8.09

%

8.48

%

Due to the negative effects of COVID-19, the Company implemented measures to reduce its costs, including negotiations with landlords regarding rent concessions. The Company subleasesis in ongoing discussions with landlords regarding rent obligations, including deferrals, abatements, and/or restructuring of rent. As the rent concessions received and currently being contemplated do not result in a portionsignificant increase in cash payments, the Company has elected to account for these concessions as a variable lease payment in accordance with ASC Topic 842. The Company’s right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities have not been remeasured for lease concessions received. Variable lease cost is comprised of its office spacepercentage rent and common area maintenance, offset by rent concessions received as a result of COVID-19.

Supplemental cash flow information related to a related party on leases where it does not needfor the entire space for its operations (see Note 9). period was as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

2020

 

2019

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities

 

$

8,491

$

8,368

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations

 

$

4,968

$

43,474

As of December 31, 2017, minimum sublease rentals2020, maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

2021

$

13,276

2022

13,229

2023

13,531

2024

12,927

2025

11,893

Thereafter

112,867

Total lease payments

177,723

Less: imputed interest

(74,337)

Present value of operating lease liabilities

 

$

103,386

F-27


Note 14 – Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and income available to be received incommon stockholders. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the future under non-cancelable subleases were $2.3 million. The Company’s sublease income, which is recorded as an offsetweighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of all potential shares of common stock including common stock issuable pursuant to rent expense, was $0.7 million for each of 2017stock options, warrants, and 2016.restricted stock units.

In 2017, the Company determined that it would not open venues in Austin and Dallas, Texas. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, the earnings per share was calculated as follows (in thousands, except earnings per share and related share data):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Net (loss) income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

$

(12,825)

$

20,831

 

  

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

28,909,963

 

28,454,385

Dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and restricted share units

 

 

1,181,834

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

28,909,963

 

29,636,219

 

  

 

  

Net (loss) income available to common stockholders per share - Basic

$

(0.44)

$

0.73

Net (loss) income available to common stockholders per share - Diluted

$

(0.44)

$

0.70

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, stock options, warrants and restricted share units totaling 1.4 million and 1.0 million, respectively, were determined to be anti-dilutive and were therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

Note 15 – Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

The Company is authorized by its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to issue up to 75.0 million shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there are 29.1 million and 28.6 million shares of common stock outstanding, respectively.

The Company has accrued for approximately $1.5the following warrants to purchase shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:

Shares available for purchase as of

Warrants

Exercise

December 31,

December 31,

Issuance date

Holder of warrants

Expiration date

Issued

Price

2020

2019

June 27, 2016

2235570 Ontario Limited

June 27, 2026

100,000

$

2.61

100,000

100,000

August 11, 2016

Anson Investments Master Fund LP

August 11, 2026

300,000

2.61

300,000

300,000

October 24, 2016

Anson Investments Master Fund LP

October 24, 2026

340,000

2.39

340,000

340,000

November 15, 2017

2017 Securities Purchase Agreement investors

May 15, 2023

875,000

$

1.63

125,000

125,000

The issuance of a dividend is dependent on a variety of factors, including but not limited to, available cash and the overall financial condition of the Company. The issuance of a dividend is also subject to legal restrictions and the terms of the Company’s credit agreement. The Company did not issue dividends related to its common stock in the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized by its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to issue 10.0 million shares of future lease payments, netpreferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The Company’s Board may designate the rights, powers and preferences of expected sublease income. These charges are includedthe preferred stock, which may have superior rights to common shareholders in lease termination expensesterms of liquidation and asset write-offs ondividend

F-28


preference, voting and other rights. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the consolidated statementsBoard had not designated the rights of operationsthe preferred stock and comprehensive loss. These charges are not specifically allocated to our reportable segments.there were no outstanding shares of preferred stock.

Note 13 -16 – Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Contribution Retirement Plan

The Company sponsors a qualified defined contribution retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering all eligible employees, as defined in the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan allows participating employees to defer the receipt of a portion of their compensation, on a pre-tax or post-tax basis, and contribute such amount to one or more investment options. Employer contributions to the plan are at the discretion of the Company. The Company did not accrue or make any employer contributions in 20172020 and 2016.2019.

Equity Incentive Plan

Note 14 - Outstanding Warrants

On June 27, 2016,In October 2013, the Company entered intoBoard approved the Ontario Note (See Note 7)2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Equity Plan”). In considerationThe 2013 Equity Plan provides for the granting of stock options, warrants, restricted stock or other stock-based awards to directors, officers, key employees and other key individuals performing services for the Company. All awards are required to be approved by the Board or a designated committee of the loan amount, the Ontario Noteholder received a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock atBoard. Options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of $2.61 (the “Ontario Warrant”). Usinggrant and expire after ten years. Vesting of options and restricted stock can either be based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model,passage of time or on the fair valueachievement of performance goals.

The 2013 Equity Plan will terminate automatically in October 2023, unless terminated by the Board at an earlier date. The Board has the authority to amend, modify or terminate the 2013 Equity Plan, subject to any required approval by the Company’s stockholders under applicable law or upon advice of counsel. No such action would affect any options previously granted under the 2013 Equity Plan without the consent of the Ontario Warrant was determinedholders.

Effective June 4, 2019, the Company’s stockholders approved amendments to be $0.1 million. The Ontario Warrant is exercisable at any time through June 27, 2026, in whole or in part.the 2013 Equity Plan (the “2019 Equity Plan”). Among other things, the amendments increased the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2019 Equity Plan by 2,300,000 shares to a new maximum aggregate limit of 7,073,922 shares. As of December 31, 2017, there are 100,0002020, the Company had 1,216,192 remaining shares still available for purchaseissuance under the Ontario Warrant.2019 Equity Plan.

Stock-based compensation cost for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Included in stock-based compensation cost was $0.3 million and $0.2 million of unrestricted stock granted to directors for years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Such grants were awarded consistent with the Board’s compensation practices.

F-29


Stock Option Activity

On August 11, 2016,Changes in outstanding stock options during the Company entered into the Anson August Note (See Note 7). In consideration of the loan amount, Anson received a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.61 (the “Anson August Warrant”). Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, theyears ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

Weighted

Weighted

average

Intrinsic

average exercise

remaining

value

    

Shares

    

price

    

contractual life

    

(thousands)

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

2,001,008

$

3.29

 

  

 

  

Granted

 

68,000

 

2.99

 

  

 

  

Exercised

 

(42,000)

 

2.13

 

  

 

  

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

 

(220,500)

 

2.70

 

  

 

  

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

1,806,508

$

3.37

 

5.87 years

$

1,428

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

 

1,270,508

$

3.93

 

5.10 years

$

667

Granted

 

 

 

  

 

  

Exercised

 

(18,000)

 

2.13

 

  

 

  

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

 

(81,500)

 

3.75

 

  

 

  

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

 

1,707,008

$

3.37

 

4.98 years

$

1,454

Exercisable at December 31, 2020

 

1,443,675

$

3.57

 

4.68 years

$

1,112

The fair value of options granted in the Anson August Warrant was determined to be $0.4 million. The Anson August Warrant is exercisable at any time through August 11, 2026, in whole or in part. As ofyear ended December 31, 2017, there are 300,000 shares still available for purchase under the Anson August Warrant.

On October 24, 2016, the Company entered into the Anson October Note (See Note 7). In consideration of the loan amount, Anson received a warrant to purchase 340,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.39 per share (the “Anson October Warrant”). Using the Black-Scholes option price model, the fair value of the Anson October Warrant2019 was determined to be $0.4 million. The Anson October Warrant is exercisable at any time through October 24, 2026, in whole or in part. The Anson October Warrant contains limitations that prevent Anson from acquiring shares of the Company’s common stock upon exercise of the Anson October Warrant that would result in the number of shares beneficially owned by Anson and to exceed 9.99% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock then issued and outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, there are 340,000 shares still available for purchase under the Anson October Warrant.

F-21

On November 15, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (See Note 17) with certain investors pursuant to which such investors were issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.63 per share (the “SPA Warrants”). Each SPA Warrant is exercisable commencing on the sixth month anniversary of the date of issuance and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date that it became exercisable. As of December 31, 2017, there are 875,000 shares still available for purchase under the SPA Warrants. Using the Black-Scholes option price model, the fair value of the SPA Warrants was determined to be $0.4 million.

The fair values of warrants issued during 2017 and 2016 were estimated on the date of issuancegrant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions by grant year:

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Expected life (in years)  5 years   10 years 
Risk-free interest rate  2.04%  1.00% - 1.77%
Volatility  38.1%  37.0%
Dividend yield  0%  0%

Expected life, in years

 

8.5 years

Risk-free interest rate

2.62

%

Volatility

42.0

%

Dividend yield

%

Note 15 - Discontinued Operations

Prior to 2015,The weighted average fair value of stock options issued was $1.55 for the Company decided to cease operations for six of its locations. The following table shows the components of assets and liabilities that are related to discontinued operationsyear ended December 31, 2019. There were no stock options granted in the Company's consolidated balance sheetsyear ended December 31, 2020.

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested stock options as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016 (in thousands):2019 and changes during the years then ended, is presented below:

Weighted average

    

Shares

    

grant date fair value

Non-vested stock options at December 31, 2018

 

926,500

$

0.91

Granted

 

68,000

 

2.99

Vested

 

(281,500)

 

1.12

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

 

(177,000)

 

0.95

Non-vested stock options at December 31, 2019

 

536,000

$

0.87

Granted

 

 

Vested

 

(272,667)

 

0.75

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

 

 

Non-vested stock options at December 31, 2020

 

263,333

$

0.99

  As of December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Other current assets $108  $108 
Security deposits     85 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (48)  (530)
Net assets (liabilities) $60  $(337)

The Company’s discontinued operations did not provide revenue to the Company for eachfair value of options that vested in the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016. The Company’s owns 100%2019 were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. As of its discontinued operations.December 31, 2020, there are 579,402 milestone-based options outstanding, and there is approximately $0.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to these milestone-based options. These options vest based on the achievement of Company and individual objectives as set by the Board.

As of December 31, 2020, there is approximately $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

F-30


Note 16 - LitigationTable of Contents

Restricted Stock Unit Activity

The Company issues restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2019 Equity Plan. The fair value of these RSUs is party to claims in lawsuits incidental to its business. Indetermined based upon the opinionclosing fair market value of management, the ultimate outcome of such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effectCompany’s common stock on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.grant date.

In November 2015, certain employees filed a class action lawsuit against twoA summary of the Company's subsidiariesstatus of RSUs and Bagatelle LA, an equity investeechanges during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 is presented below:

Weighted average

    

Shares

    

grant date fair value

Non-vested RSUs at December 31, 2018

 

764,201

$

2.54

Granted

 

584,593

 

3.04

Vested

 

(227,889)

 

2.64

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

 

(165,894)

 

2.73

Non-vested RSUs at December 31, 2019

 

955,011

$

2.69

Granted

 

1,316,174

 

1.21

Vested

 

(305,027)

 

2.77

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

 

(94,566)

 

2.12

Non-vested RSUs at December 31, 2020

 

1,871,592

$

1.68

As of December 31, 2020, 150,000 restricted shares subject to performance-based vesting were still outstanding, and there is approximately $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to these milestone-based options. As of December 31, 2020, the Company which has since ceased operations, (collectively, the “LA Defendants”) alleging that the LA Defendants neglected to conform to California state and local rest and meal period requirements as well as other employment-related allegations. In April 2017, the LA Defendants agreed with the plaintiffs to propose court approval of a class action settlement to avoid the uncertainty and risk associated with continued litigation, which agreement was preliminarily approved by the court. Accordingly, based on the probability of this matter reaching final approval, in the second quarter of 2017, the Company recorded $0.2had approximately $1.7 million of its share in thesetotal unrecognized compensation costs as settlements on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. In addition, through Bagatelle Investors, the Company recognized its equity in Bagatelle LA's share of the settlement costs. Final judgment by the court of this settlement agreement was entered on September 26, 2017 and the settlement payment of $0.2 million was made by the Company in October 2017.

In May 2016, certain employees filed a class action lawsuit against two of the Company's subsidiaries and Bagatelle NY, an equity investee of the Company, (collectively, the “NY Defendants”), alleging that the NY Defendants improperly took tip credits due to those employees, as well certain other employment-related allegations. In May 2017, to avoid the uncertainty, risks and cost associated with continued litigation, the NY Defendants reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs. Such settlement agreement was preliminarily approved by the court. Accordingly, based on the probability of this matter reaching final approval, in the second quarter of 2017, the Company recorded $0.5 million of its share in these costs as settlements on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. In addition, through Bagatelle Investors, the Company recognized its equity in Bagatelle NY’s share of the settlement costs (approximately $0.3 million). Final judgment by the court of this settlement agreement was entered on November 26, 2017. The first installment payment of $0.3 million was paid on December 14, 2017, with the second and final payment of $0.2 million paid on March 1, 2018.

F-22

In September 2017, the Company recorded a $0.5 million charge related to an arrangement withrestricted stock awards, which will be recognized over a management agreement partner to resolve a dispute. This charge was recorded as a componentweighted average period of settlements on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.1.8 years.

Note 17 - Stockholders’ Equity– Segment Reporting

Common Stock

The Company is authorized by its amended and restated certificateIn the fourth quarter of corporation to issue up to 75.0 million shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there are 27.2 million and 25.1 million shares outstanding, respectively.

The Company issued warrants to purchase 5.8 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share2019, in connectionconjunction with the Company’s initial public offering. These warrants expired on February 27, 2016.Kona Grill acquisition, the Company implemented certain organizational changes, including the reorganization of our internal reporting structure to better facilitate our strategy for growth and operational efficiency. As a result of the expiration of these warrants, an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of common stock were forfeited and such shares were canceled.

On January 19, 2016,organizational changes, the Company commenced a rights offering (the “Rights Offering”) of non-transferable subscription rights to holders of record ofhas identified its common stock as of January 15, 2016 to purchase up to 1,454,545 shares of common stock. The Company granted holders of its common stock non-transferable subscription rights to purchase one share of common stock at a subscription price of $2.75 per share. Each holder received one subscription right for each 17.16861 shares of common stock owned on January 15, 2016. Each subscription right entitled its holder to purchase one share of common stock at the subscription price. The Rights Offering which closed on February 9, 2016, generated approximately $4.0 million in gross proceeds before deducting offering expenses. The Company issued a total of 1,454,545 shares of common stock at $2.75 per share. Net proceeds from the Rights Offering of $3.8 million were used by the Company to primarily fund the planned development of future STK restaurants.

On November 15, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain investors named therein, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering by the Company, an aggregate of 1.75 million shares of its common stock, at an offering price of $1.50 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $2.6 million before deducting offering expenses. In a concurrent private placement, the Company agreed to issue warrants to the investors who participated in such transaction (See Note 14).

The issuance of a dividend is dependent on a variety of factors, including but not limited to, available cash and the overall financial condition of the Company. The issuance of a dividend is also subject to legal restrictions and the terms of our credit agreements with BankUnited.

Preferred Stock

Under the terms of the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company’s Board authorized the issuance of 10.0 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. Preferred shareholders may have superior rights to common shareholders in terms of liquidation and dividend preference, voting and other rights. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there are no outstanding shares of preferred stock.

Note 18 - Stock-based Compensation

In October 2013, the Board approved the 2013 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Equity Plan”). The 2013 Equity Plan provides for the granting of stock options, warrants, restricted stock or other stock-based awards to directors, officers, key employees and other key individuals performing services for the Company. All awards are required to be approved by the Board or a committee of the Board to be established for such purpose. The 2013 Equity Plan will terminate automatically in October 2023, unless terminated by the Board at an earlier date. The Board has the authority to amend, modify or terminate the 2013 Equity Plan, subject to any required approval by the Company’s stockholders under applicable law or upon advice of counsel. No such action may affect any options previously granted under the 2013 Equity Plan without the consent of the holders.

The 2013 Equity Plan provides for the issuance of up to 4,773,992 shares of common stock. Options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of grant and have a contractual life of ten years. Vesting can either be based on the passage of time or on the achievement of performance goals. As of December 31, 2017, there were 473,041 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2013 Equity Plan.

F-23

Stock Based Compensation Cost

Stock-based compensation cost for 2017 and 2016 was $1.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Included in stock-based compensation cost is $0.2 million of unrestricted stock granted to directors for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Such grants were awarded consistent with the Board’s compensation practices.

The fair value of options granted during 2017 and 2016 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions by grant year:

  December 31, December 31,
  2017 2016
Expected life (in years) 6.5 years 6.5 years
Risk-free interest rate 1.86% – 2.00% 1.13% - 1.24%
Volatility 37% 37%
Dividend yield 0% 0%

The weighted-average fair value of stock options issued was $0.77 and $1.19 for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Stock Option Activity

Changes in outstanding stock options for 2017 werereportable operating segments as follows:

  Shares  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
  Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  1,857,012   4.28         
2017 Grants  1,260,000   1.96         
Exercised              

Cancelled, expired or forfeited

  (801,977)  3.14         
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  2,315,035   3.41   

7.25

  $497,700 
Exercisable at December 31, 2017  890,384   4.84   

4.67

    

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2017 and changes during the year then ended, is presented below:

  Shares  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
       
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2016  1,180,030  $1.56       
Granted  1,260,000   0.79         
Vested  (245,402)  1.76         
Forfeited  (769,977)  1.28         
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2017  1,424,651  $0.99         

The fair value of options that vested during 2017 was $0.4 million and $1.5 million. During 2017, the Company granted no options that vest upon the achievement of certain milestones. As of December 31, 2017, there are 579,402 milestone-based options outstanding. These options vest based on the achievement of Company and individual objectives as set by the Board.

As of December 31, 2017, there is approximately $1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years.

F-24STK. The STK segment consists of the results of operations from STK restaurant locations, competing in the full-service dining industry, as well as management, license and incentive fee revenue generated from the STK brand and operations of STK restaurant locations.
Kona Grill. The Kona Grill segment includes the results of operations of Kona Grill restaurant locations.
ONE Hospitality. The ONE Hospitality segment is comprised of the management, license and incentive fee revenue and results of operations generated from the Company’s other brands and venue concepts, which include ANGEL, Heliot, Hideout, Marconi, and Radio. Additionally, this segment includes the results of operations generated from F&B hospitality management agreements with hotels, casinos and other high-end locations.
Corporate. The Corporate segment consists of the following: general and administrative costs, stock-based compensation, acquisition related gains and losses, lease termination expenses, transaction costs, COVID-19 related expenses and other income and expenses. This segment also includes STK Meat Market, an e-commerce platform that offers signature steak cuts nationwide, the Company’s major off-site events group, which supports all brands and venue concepts, and revenue generated from gift card programs.

Restricted Stock Award Activity

The Company issues restricted stock awards under the 2013 Equity Plan. The fair value of these awards is determined based upon the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

A summary of the status of restricted stock awards and changes during the year ended December 31, 2017 are presented below:

  Shares  Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
 
       
Non-vested at December 31, 2016  716,250  $2.73 
Granted  710,000   1.83 
Vested  (181,750)  2.01 
Cancelled, expired or forfeited  (259,500)  2.56 
Non-vested at December 31, 2017  985,000  $2.26 

During 2017, the Company granted 375,000 restricted shares of stock to employees and officers of the Company. These shares vest based on the achievement of certain EBITDA and stock price thresholds. As of December 31, 2017, 100,000 shares vested and 75,000 shares were forfeited. As of December 31, 2017, 200,000 restricted shares subject to performance-based milestones were still outstanding.

Note 19 - Segment Reporting

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, (“CEO”), who began serving as the Company’s CEO on October 30, 2017 and has been deemedis the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, manages the business and allocates resources via a combination of restaurant sales reports and operating segment profit information, (which is defined as revenuerevenues less operating expenses)expenses, related to the Company’s three sourcesfour operating segments.

F-31


Certain financial information relating to the consolidated statements of operationsyears ended December 31, 2020 and comprehensive loss. We have revised our segments to align with how our CEO manages the business.2019 for each segment is provided below (in thousands). Prior period segmentsyear amounts have been restatedrevised to conform to the current year’s presentationyear segment presentation.

    

STK

    

Kona Grill

    

ONE Hospitality

    

Corporate

    

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2020

Total revenues

 

$

60,932

 

$

78,591

 

$

1,197

 

$

1,223

$

141,943

Operating income (loss)(1)

6,523

3,356

(517)

(23,056)

(13,694)

Capital asset additions

$

2,734

$

1,952

$

206

$

895

$

5,787

As of December 31, 2020

Total assets

$

81,431

$

96,262

$

5,484

$

32,392

$

215,569

STK

    

Kona Grill

    

ONE Hospitality

    

Corporate

    

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2019

Total revenues

$

89,857

$

23,741

$

5,964

$

1,119

$

120,681

Operating income (loss)(2)

15,242

1,511

1,726

(5,688)

12,791

Capital asset additions

$

3,330

$

195

$

40

$

792

$

4,357

As of December 31, 2019

Total assets

$

82,691

$

93,829

$

8,252

$

21,813

$

206,585


(1)Operating loss for the Corporate segment for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $5.5 million in COVID-19 related expenses.
(2)Operating loss for the Corporate segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes $11.0 million bargain purchase gain from the Kona Grill acquisition.

Note 18 – Geographic Information

Certain financial information by geographic location relating to the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 is provided below (in thousands):.

  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues:        
Owned restaurants $58,654  $54,068 
Owned food, beverage and other operations  10,227   9,880 
Managed and licensed operations  10,779   8,466 
  $79,660  $72,414 
         
Segment Profits:        
Owned restaurants $6,034  $5,745 
Owned food, beverage and other operations  827   1,075 
Managed and licensed operations  10,779   8,466 
         
Total segment profit  17,640   15,286 
         
General and administrative  11,893   11,172 
Depreciation and amortization  3,051   2,647 
Interest expense, net of interest income  1,167   464 
Equity in income of investee companies  (168)  (674)
Other, net  5,522   7,670 
         
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes $(3,825) $(5,993)

F-25

For the year ended December 31, 

    

2020

    

2019

Domestic revenues

 

$

140,537

 

$

115,449

International revenues

 

1,406

 

5,232

Total revenues

$

141,943

$

120,681

  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Total assets:        
Owned restaurants $40,570  $40,600 
Owned food, beverage and other operations*  

7,385

   7,048 
Managed and licensed operations  

5,060

   4,496 
Total $53,015  $52,144 
* Includes corporate assets        
         
Capital asset additions:        
Owned restaurants $3,955  $

11,151

 
Owned food, beverage and other operations**  655   

450

 
Managed and licensed operations      
Total $

4,610

  $11,601 
** Includes corporate capital asset additions        

December 31, 

December 31, 

2020

2019

Domestic long-lived assets

 

$

180,935

 

$

179,143

International long-lived assets

 

258

 

301

Total long-lived assets

$

181,193

$

179,444

Note 20 - Geographic Information

19 – Commitments and Contingencies

The following table contains certain financial information by geographic location forCompany is party to claims in lawsuits incidental to its business, including lease disputes and employee-related matters. In the years ended December 31, 2017opinion of management, the ultimate outcome of such matters and 2016 (in thousands):

  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues        
United States:        
Owned restaurants $58,654  $54,068 
Owned food, beverage and other operations  10,227   9,880 
Managed and licensed operations  

5,723

   3,755 
Total United States revenues $74,604  $67,703 
         
Foreign:        
Owned restaurants $  $ 
Owned food, beverage and other operations      
Managed and licensed operations  

5,056

   4,711 
Total foreign revenues $

5,056

  $4,711 
Total revenues $79,660  $72,414 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Long-lived Assets        
United States:        
Owned restaurants $

37,907

  $

37,723

 
Owned food, beverage and other operations  

5,088

   

4,477

 
Managed and licensed operations  

109

   

329

 
Total United States long-lived assets $43,104  $42,529 
         
Foreign:        
Owned restaurants $  $ 
Owned food, beverage and other operations      
Managed and licensed operations  148   269 
Total foreign long-lived assets $148  $269 
Total long-lived assets $43,252  $

42,798

 

F-26

Note 21 - Liquidity

Duringjudgments, individually or in the year ended December 31, 2017,aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company incurred a net loss of $4.0 million and had a working capital deficit of $7.2 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's accumulated deficit was $32.0 million. Further, as of December 31, 2017, the Company's cash and cash equivalents was $1.5 million. The Company expects to finance its operations for at least the next twelve months following the issuance of itsCompany’s consolidated financial statements, including the costsposition or results of opening currently planned restaurants, through cash provided by operations, construction allowances provided by landlords of certain locations. Other sources of liquidity could include additional potential issuances of debt or equity securities in public or private financings, or warrant or option exercises. While the Company continues to seek capital through a number of means, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to it on acceptable terms, if at all. If the Company is unable to access necessary capital to meet its liquidity needs, the Company may have to delay or discontinue the expansion of its business or raise funds on terms that it may consider unfavorable.operations.

F-32

Note 22 - Subsequent Events

On March 19, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its 10% effective ownership interest in One 29 Park for $0.6 million, subject to the acquiring party receiving consent from their lender and other customary closing conditions.

F-27