UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K /A

Amendment No. 1

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February ~~28, 2018~~29, 2020

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 000-55079

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		27-2343603
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)


1 East Liberty, 6th Floor Reno, NV 89501		89501
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(702) 990-3271

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, ~~$0.001~~$0.00001 par value		OTC QBPINK

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,“” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	[ ]	Accelerated filer	[ ]

Non-accelerated filer	[ ]X]	Smaller reporting company	[X]
		Emerging growth company	[ ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

[ ] Yes [X] No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 31, ~~2017~~2019 based upon the closing price reported on such date was approximately ~~$17,439,944.~~$409. Shares of voting stock held by each officer and director and by each person who, as of August 31, ~~2017,~~2019, may be deemed as have beneficially owned more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination of affiliate status for any other purpose.

As of ~~June 12, 2018,~~July 22, 2020, there were ~~165,340,897~~195,549,343 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2020 (“Form 10-K”) is to submit Exhibit 101 to the Form 10-K in accordance with Rule 405 of Regulation S-T. Exhibit 101 consists of the Interactive Data Files from the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2020.

Additionally, we corrected two typographical errors as follows:

1. On the cover page, under the heading “Title of each class” the Common stock par value has been corrected from “$0.001” to “$0.00001”.

2. On page F-1, in the table, the column heading label “Balance February 29, 2019” has been corrected to “Balance February 29, 2020”.

Table of Contents


		Page
PART I

Item 1.	Business	1

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	78

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	138

Item 2.	Properties	138

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	138

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	148

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	149

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	17

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2324

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	2324

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures	2324

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	2425

Item 9B.	Other Information	2526

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	26

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	2728

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2829

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2930

Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	2930

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	3031

	Signatures	3233

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements in this report contain or may contain forward-looking statements. These statements, identified by words such as “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “should”, “expect” and similar expressions include our expectations and objectives regarding our future financial position, operating results and business strategy. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous assumptions and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, our ability to secure suitable financing to continue with our existing business or change our business and conclude a merger, acquisition or combination with a business prospect, economic, political and market conditions and fluctuations, government and industry regulation, interest rate risk, U.S. and global competition, and other factors. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Readers should carefully review this report in its entirety, including but not limited to our financial statements and the notes thereto and the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, ~~2018.~~2019. We advise you to carefully review the reports and documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), particularly our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Business Overview

Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (formerly known as On the Move Systems Corp.) (“~~OMVS”~~AITX” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Florida on March 25, ~~2010. OMVS~~2010 and reincorporated ~~into~~in Nevada on February 17, 2015. ~~OMVS’s fiscal year end~~On August 24, 2018, Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc., changed its name from On the Move Systems Corp (“AITX”).

Robotic Assistance Devices, LLC (“RAD”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 26, 2016 as a LLCand was founded by current President Steve Reinharz. On July 25, 2017, Robotic Assistance Devices LLC converted to a C Corporation, Robotic Assistance Devices, Inc. through the issuance of 10,000 common shares to its sole shareholder.

On August 28, 2017, AITX completed the acquisition of RAD (the “Acquisition”), whereby AITX acquired all the ownership and equity interest in RAD for 3,350,000 shares of AITX Series E Preferred Stock and 2,450 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. AITX’s prior business focus was transportation services, and AITX was exploring the on-demand logistics market by developing a network of logistics partnerships. As a result of the closing of the Acquisition, AITX has succeeded to the business of RAD, in which AITX purchased all the outstanding shares of capital stock of RAD. As a result, AITX’s business going forward will consist of one segment activity which is ~~February 28. OMVS~~the delivery of artificial intelligence and robotic solutions for operational, security and monitoring needs.

The Acquisition was treated as a reverse recapitalization effected by a share exchange for financial accounting and reporting purposes since substantially all of AITX’s operations were disposed of as part of the consummation of the transaction. Therefore, no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded by AITX as a result of the Acquisition. RAD is ~~located at 701 North Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200, Henderson, Nevada 89074,~~treated as the accounting acquirer as its stockholders control the Company after the Acquisition, even though AITX was the legal acquirer. As a result, the assets and liabilities and the ~~telephone number is 702-990-3271.~~historical operations that are reflected in these financial statements are those of RAD as if RAD had always been the reporting company.

~~OMVS’s~~AITX’s prior business focus was transportation services, and we were previously exploring the on-demand logistics market by seeking to develop a network of logistics partnerships. On August 28, 2017, ~~OMVS~~AITX acquired all of the outstanding shares of ~~Robotic Assistance Devices, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “RAD” or the “Company”).~~RAD. Following the RAD acquisition, ~~our business consists of delivering~~the Company is focused on applying advanced artificial intelligence ~~(“AI”) based~~(AI) driven technologies, paired with multi-use hardware and supported by custom software and cloud services, to intelligently automate and integrate a variety of high frequency security, concierge and operational tasks.

RAD’s solutions are offered as a recurring monthly subscription, typically with a minimum 12 month subscription contract. RAD’s solutions earn over 75% gross margin over the life of each deployed asset. Specifically, RAD provides workflow automation solutions delivered through a system of hardware, software and cloud services. All elements of hardware and software design offered by RAD are 100% designed, developed and owned by RAD.

Mission

AITX’ mission is to apply Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology to solve ~~complex~~ enterprise problems that can be categorized as expensive, repetitive and ~~challenges while delivering an immediate return on investment. Our initial~~outside of the core competencies of the prospect organization.

A short list of basic examples include:


	1.	Typical security guard related functions such as monitoring a parking lot during and after hours and responding appropriately. This scenario applies to perimeters, interior yard areas and related similar environments.

	2.	Integrated hardware/software with Artificial Intelligence driven responses, simulating and expanding on what legacy or manned solutions could perform.

	3.	Automation of common access control functions through technology utilized facial recognition and machine vision, leapfrogging most legacy solutions in use today.

- 1 -

RAD solutions are unique in the fact they:


	1.	Start with an AI-driven response with the easy ability to connect to manned response.

	2.	Use unique hardware purpose built by RAD for delivery of these solutions.

	3.	Deliver services through RAD-developed software and cloud services, allowing enterprise IT groups to focus on core competencies instead of maintenance of complex video and security platforms.

RAD’s first industry focus is the $ 100B+ global security services market. ⁽¹⁾

RAD’s founder, Steve Reinharz, has 20+ years in various leadership/ownership roles in the security industry and was part of a successful exit to a global multinational security company in 2004. Mr. Reinharz has built a committed team of employees that have demonstrated tremendous productivity and self-sacrifice to advance the stated mission.

RAD’s current goal is to disrupt and capture a significant portion of both the ~~$30+ billion~~ human security guard ~~market(1)~~market ($30B +) ⁽²⁾ and ~~the $20+ billion physical security market~~‘physical security’ (cctv, access control, ~~intercom) and become a key driver in the $1+ billion managed security services market(2)~~etc.) market ($20B +) through ~~its~~it’s innovative RAD ~~Software Suite and manufactured solutions which combine the most desired features of both industries in a compact, cloud based mobile environment.~~solution ecosystem.

~~__________~~

⁽¹⁾ https://www.statista.com/statistics/323113/distribution-of-the-security-services-market-worldwide/

⁽²⁾ https://www.statista.com/statistics/294206/revenue-of-security-services-in-the-us/

~~(2) https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/80145-managed-wireless-security-services-market-to-top-1-billion-in-2014-1~~

AITX Expected Acquisitions

It is expected that AITX will acquire 3 remaining complementary companies owned by Mr. Reinharz sometime before the end of fiscal year 2021. These companies will be completely rolled into AITX as-is with no special compensation to Mr. Reinharz as setout below.

BOLO Technologies, Inc., wholly owned by Mr. Reinharz, has had its limited assets of Intellectual Property and software formally integrated into RAD without necessity of any acquisition by RAD. BOLO created an innovative security-centric platform that integrates additional technologies to give security directors and law enforcement the easiest access to create, manage and track ‘Be On The Lookout’ (BOLO) alerts. ‘BOLO’ is a security industry term used to label interesting suspects such as disgruntled former employees, persons of interest wanted for questioning related to suspicious events and several other similar types of functions and services. BOLO Technologies will use advanced AI for data correlation and pattern matching and is focused on giving customers the ability to pre-empt, predict and prevent possible incidents. BOLO uses a service model similar to RAD’s robots-as-a-service model.

‘RAD Canada’, wholly owned by Mr. Reinharz, provides most of the Research & Development for RAD’s solutions. Specifically, all RAD hardware solutions are designed and developed by this entity as well as some firmware, software and cloud software elements. All but two RAD Canada resources have been absorbed into RAD.

‘RAD Group’, wholly owned by Mr. Reinharz, provides additional sales channels for AITX. This will be acquired by AITX with no compensation to Mr. Reinharz.

AITX, with these acquisitions, will enjoy the benefits of a skilled R&D group that includes skilled industrial and software engineers plus a security-focused platform that provides unique services in high demand. Mr. Reinharz will remain President of all AITX subsidiaries.

Mr. Reinharz has not taken any cash salary or earnings from RAD, AITX or any related entity since inception of the RAD in 2016.

~~Recent Developments~~Background - First Commercial Rugged Outdoor Security Robot

On August 28, 2017, OMVS entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with RAD and Steve Reinharz, as sole stockholder of RAD. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, on August 28, 2017, OMVS acquired 10,000 shares of RAD’s common stock, representing all of RAD’s issued and outstanding capital stock, from Mr. Reinharz in exchange for the issuance of (i) 3,350,000 shares of its Series E Preferred Stock and (ii) 2,450 shares of its Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result of the RAD acquisition, RAD became a wholly owned subsidiary of OMVS. RAD was considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes.

~~Business~~

Our business consists of seeking to deliver AI based solutions to solve complex enterprise problems and challenges while delivering an immediate return on investment. We have initially targeted the security industry, which utilizes electronic systems and further involves approximately 1.1 million security guards in the U.S. alone. We plan to provide our AI robotic solutions to companies and governments so that they can employ such solutions for the purposes of protecting their assets, whether those assets are government, commercial or industrial. We believe that our security guard solutions combine both robotic and AI solutions to provide a superior solution to our clients which can save them money on their security needs.

RAD was incorporated as a limited liability corporation under the laws of the State of Wyoming in July 2016 and later reincorporated (as a C corp.) in the State of Nevada in July 2017. RAD’s mission is to deliver artificial intelligence solutions to solve complex and expensive enterprise organizational challenges. We believe that RAD’s robotic solutions can improve the security services of any enterprise due to advanced technology that is always on, compared to human guarding where it is difficult to maintain non-stop attention in mundane or dangerous guarding roles.

~~Founded~~started by Mr. ~~Steve~~ Reinharz in the summer of ~~2016,~~2016. RAD originally partnered with SMP Robotics Systems Corp (SMP) ~~to commercialize~~. and commercialized the SMP S5 Robot for the security ~~industry.~~market. RAD’s commercialization of the platform focused on integrating traditional security industry manufacturers’ solutions onto the robotics platform. After two paid ~~proof~~Proof of ~~concepts~~Concepts for large utility companies (under an NDA) and over 18 months of development and testing RAD began deployments with various Fortune 500 customers. These deployments were scheduled to begin in October 2017 but were delayed until December 2017 due to various supply chain challenges.

~~- 1 -~~

By ~~April 2017~~March 2018 it was apparent that ~~the~~ S5 platform promotion and development was not sustainable and RAD ~~pulled its~~began to pull robots ~~from~~out of service. ~~With over 40 attempted deployments, it appeared that the S5~~

- 2 -

The Robots were ~~being~~ rejected by customers due to ~~their unreliability~~unsatisfactory reliability and ~~certain~~some technical flaws ~~which~~that could not be solved despite full efforts by ~~both~~ SMP and RAD. ~~SMP has shared that they expect to solve these technical issues with an updated version to their S5 Robot but no firm date~~RAD now considers this phase of the ~~release has been provided. As a result,~~ company ‘Phase 1’ into robotics. Over 40 deployments were attempted during this period.

RAD has ~~shifted its solutions to its Security Control and Observation Tower (~~“~~SCOT~~™”~~), its RAD Software Suite and future solutions 100% developed and owned by RAD. It is possible moving forward that RAD will cease to be an~~had no contact with SMP ~~dealer, however it expects no impact on its’ business if~~Robotics since April 2018.

Much of RAD’s existing convertible debt was acquired in support of the RAD/SMP ~~relationship ends. RAD calls its current lineup of solutions the ’2~~robotics program.

Background – RAD’s 2^nd Generation ~~of electronic guarding solutions.’~~Ecosystem

RAD’s primary strategy has always been to use AI technology and modern systems to transform the security industry. Mobile robots, indoor and outdoor, are a part of that strategy. ~~RAD will continue~~However, to ~~pursue such avenues but sees SCOT~~™ ~~and its forthcoming derivatives as its primary source~~completely realize the delivery of ~~revenue for the remainder~~these solutions a set of ~~2018.~~‘stationary robots’ required development.

~~The~~These stationary robots launched in April 2018 with the Security Control and Observation Tower (SCOT, development of ~~SCOT~~™which began in August 2017. SCOT™ performs many of the same functions of a stationary human security guard, plus many features that human guards cannot perform, and at approximately 15% of the cost. ~~We are unaware of any~~There is no known comparable solution available today that blends technology, usability, special features and cost. This is why SCOT™ has ~~seen~~ growing demand and has received considerable accolades. ~~As a result, the Company has accelerated SCOT~~™’~~s development~~

SCOT’s positive market reception reinvigorated RAD and the ~~RAD Software Suite.~~focus turned to accelerating the development of the software and cloud services that support SCOT.

SCOT™ runs on the RAD Software Suite™, as all ~~current and future~~ RAD security solutions ~~will.~~do. This software suite is a cloud and mobile ~~based~~ solution that is at the heart of RAD’s security solution.

~~The~~After extraordinary efforts by the team, beta ~~release of~~ SCOT™ ~~took place~~ was first shown to customers in Ohio at the end of February 2018. This beta exposition was to test customer reception and receive final voice-of-the-customer input. Security representatives from Cincinnati Reds, Cincinnati Bengals, Cincinnati Police ~~Department~~Departments and ~~the~~ County of Hamilton ~~Sheriff~~’sSheriff’s Department were ~~present~~shown this early SCOT and gave SCOT™ and the preliminary RAD Software Suite a tremendous endorsement. ~~SCOT~~™Feedback was ~~officially launched~~incorporated into SCOT and ideas on ~~April 2, 2018, a week before~~SCOT derivatives were added to the ~~ISC West show, the largest security show in the U.S. SCOT~~™’~~s first three deployments were made on April 9 to two clients. Both clients have since requested additional SCOT~~™ ~~units for their facilities.~~hardware development roadmap.

At the ISC West show in April 2018 SCOT™ won three awards: (1) a SIA New Product Award for Law Enforcement/Guarding, (2) 2018 Secure Campus Award from Campus Security and Life Safety and (3) a ‘Govie’ award for government security solutions from Security Today. ~~We were notified we won a ‘money saving’ award from an additional, non-industry organization which was made public in June 2018.~~

~~The Security Industry Association~~’~~s (SIA)~~⁽¹⁾ SIA’s New Product Showcase recognizes innovative products, services and solutions in electronic physical security, and SCOT™’s award comes in the Law Enforcement/Guarding Systems category. Technologies within the program are used in the protection of life and property in residential, commercial and institutional settings, displaying SCOT™’s importance in long-range human detection and acting as a force multiplier for safety and defense against outside threats.

~~RAD~~’~~s business shift~~⁽²⁾ RAD’s pivot to SCOT™ and its future derivatives is complete and current facilities can produce a mix of up to 100 units per month with moderate additional investment in equipment ~~space~~ and manpower. ~~The SCOT~~™~~s are primarily furnished to customers using a Solutions-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) recurring revenue model.~~

The Company’s mission is to improve customer security services of all types of enterprises while providing significant operating cost reduction through deployment of AI based solutions and systems. We believe that RAD’s solutions can improve an enterprise security services due to advanced technology that is always on, compared to human guarding where it is difficult to maintain non-stop attention in mundane guarding roles. The security guard industry suffers from low client satisfaction, high turnover and can be a source of new liabilitiesRAD has not submitted for ~~clients. Security guards often just ‘punch the clock’ and sometimes perform functions that are little more than ‘being there’.~~any awards since mid-2018 but expects future awards participation.

~~Our belief that RAD~~Currently Available Hardware Solutions are positioned to provide improved performance and lower costs to create a major disruption to the security industry are well substantiated by the interest and partnerships from major US corporations including Allied Universal Services. Discussions with the top 5 US guarding companies further substantiates that new electronic solutions must be adopted to improve customer service, to meet growing demand, to allow flexibility in meeting new government employment requirements, to respond to customer requests for lower costs, and to provide modern solutions and enhanced performance.

~~- 2 -~~

~~SCOT™~~

~~The SCOT~~™ ~~is a standalone remote, portable, self-sufficient security observation tower designed to expand an organization~~’~~s security reach instantly. RAD~~’~~s unique power system allows SCOT~~™ ~~to be quickly placed virtually anywhere for short- or long-term deployments with zero investment/planning~~RAD’s hardware lineup has improved and expanded since initial launch in ~~any supporting infrastructure.~~

~~Its use of AI based technology allows it to deliver guarding services at a fraction of the cost and it is considerably more affordable than any human or automated solution on the market.~~

~~SCOT~~™ ~~is equipped with AI that powers human detection analytics, featuring the longest-range detection at low false alarm rates. In addition, SCOT~~™ ~~debuts the RAD Software Suite, which is a collection of integrated software applications hosted in Microsoft~~’~~s Azure Cloud services and allows immediate and mobile access to alerts and controls generated by SCOT~~™~~. Each tower is equipped with the latest artificial intelligence technologies:~~April 2018. RAD’s hardware lineup includes:


▪	~~Human detection analytics~~ – ~~SuspectSpotter~~
▪	~~License plate recognition~~ – ~~LicenseSpoter~~
▪	~~Standalone power~~ – ~~RAD Power Systems~~
▪	~~MAC Tracker~~™ ~~capabilities~~ – ~~through BOLO Technologies~~
▪	~~Long-range paging~~
▪	~~Close-range video intercom~~
▪	~~Customizable wraparound LED panels~~
▪	~~Long-range high deterrence visibility~~
▪	~~Cellular connectivity and WiFi standard~~
▪	~~Credential validation and access control (optional)~~
▪	~~24/7 equipment monitoring from RAD through the Robot Monitoring Center~~
▪	~~24/7 security functions monitoring by 3~~^rd ~~parties or by the end users (or any combination thereof)~~
▪	~~Security/Help/Panic button~~
▪	~~Large Tablet featuring security and concierge services PLUS video conferencing with the SOC or guards in the field~~
▪	~~Over-the-air software updates~~
▪	~~Digital signage for concierge services or emergency/security messaging~~
▪	~~Cloud processing~~
▪	~~Various physical and anti-tamper security features~~
▪	~~Self-powering option for up to 10 days~~

~~RAD has completed development of two iterations of the SCOT~~™:


▪	~~Wally~~™ ~~is a wall-mounted version~~1.	’SCOT 2.0’ has replaced SCOT 1.x. SCOT 1 went through three significant upgrades over the first 12 months of ~~SCOT. It~~launch to arrive at SCOT 1.4. SCOT 1.4 features a ~~single camera~~mature software platform and ~~speaker (versus 4~~a refined hardware platform. SCOT solutions have operated with over 99% uptime since inception. ’SCOT’ is an acronym for ~~SCOT~~™)’Security Control and ~~was created from feedback~~Observation Tower’. It embodies and offers the full complement of solutions driven by ~~SCOT~~™’~~s Ohio presentations. Wally~~™ ~~is designed to perform lobby guard activities as well as be mounted inside parking structures and block walls. Wally~~™ ~~is indoor/outdoor rated and, like SCOT~~™~~, is IP65 rated and can operate up to 8 days on battery power. Wally~~™ ~~uses~~ the RAD ~~Software Suite while connecting to the third-party monitoring of the customer~~’~~s choice. Instead of SCOT~~™’~~s LED digital signage, Wally~~™ ~~uses a 10~~” ~~HD screen that can display digital signage and full video as desired by the end user. Wally~~™ ~~integrates with RAD~~’~~s Visitor Management system and Facial Recognition system just as SCOT~~™ ~~does. Wally~~™’~~s official introduction will be in June, 2018.~~Cloud.

▪	Facial Recognition Entry Device (“FRED”) is an add-on to the RAD Software Suite that uses facial recognition to grant access through gates and doors. This was specifically requested by several customers and prospects. FRED is designed to perform facial recognition for outdoor gate applications, main entry applications and general high security applications. FRED	SCOT 2.0 is a ~~purpose-built RAD Software Suite device meaning that it does not run~~SCOT 1.4 enclosed in an appealing modern enclosure. It also features additional LCD monitors (like a Wally), curved LED panels to support visibility and flexible messaging (as opposed to SCOT 1.x flat LED panels) and an advanced locking system. SCOT 2.0 is the ~~entire Software Suite. FRED focuses on Visitor enrollment~~realization of the concepts pioneered, demonstrated and ~~entry, employee entry, help and information.~~ tested throughout the 1.x lineup. The SCOT lineup is indoor/outdoor rated.

~~The RAD Software Suite~~

RAD’s Software Suite encompasses a suite of software applications that replace functionality for the most used security legacy hardware and software. Implemented in RAD’s hardware solutions, the RAD Software Suite delivers security services plus concierge, marketing and data collection services.

- 3 -

~~Introduced on April 2,2018, the software suite is based on the following principles:~~


▪	Legacy security technology such as video management systems do not take full advantage of modern technology because their pricing model restricts implementing new technologies, specifically cloud-based recording	All SCOT1.x units continue to perform and ~~serving of video equipment. RAD~~’~~s software~~generate revenue for the company. There are no immediately plans to replace 1.x units with 2.0 units. SCOT 1.x units can be ~~taught~~supported indefinitely under RAD’s software architecture. It is expected that in time these 1.x units will be applied to ~~an operator in less than 15 minutes, significantly less time than many other legacy solutions. This is due~~industrial applications where aesthetics are secondary to ~~a complete ground-up software design that did not need legacy connections plus the application of security industry specific experience.~~functionality.

▪	~~Modern cloud focused software design can be applied~~2.	‘WALLY’ was announced in June 2018 in the Allied Universal Services, Inc., booth at the BOMA International Show in San Antonio. WALLY is a wall-mounted derivative of SCOT that is also indoor/outdoor rated. It’s designed to ~~provide dramatic functional improvement~~bring the RAD ecosystem to ~~electronic security systems. Specifically, AI based human detection, facial recognition~~areas such as main lobbies, elevator lobbies, dock access areas and ~~pattern behavior. Using AI based solutions is essential given its reliability, accuracy and low cost.~~more.

▪	~~The Security Operations Center that~~3.	‘FRED’ was announced in September 2018 and is a complement to the RAD ecosystem by just focusing on various verified entry methods. Appropriate for office access and to be mounted on gate stanchions. FRED has since been ~~an industry stalwart can be augmented and/or replaced by better systems at a fraction of the cost.~~dropped.

▪	Intelligent solutions such as those offered by RAD collect and provide useable data, in real time, to clients. This is in contrast to many traditional industry solutions that typically offer forensic features and benefits.

~~The RAD Software Suite is 100% designed, developed and owned by RAD. RAD’s primary software solution includes but is not limited to the following:~~


▪	~~RADGuard~~™~~: This~~4.	��ROSA’ was announced to specific dealers and customers in May 2019. Official general market introduction should happen by August of 2019. ROSA is ~~the primary software that provides visitor and/or customer with links to Help, Entry functions and other customized features requested by the customer.~~an acronym for Responsive Observation Security Agent.

▪	~~RADSoC~~™~~: Cloud-served complete Security Operations Center Communications software application that allows monitoring at the Security Operating Center (SOC) to see and communicate with SCOT~~

▪5.	‘AVA’ was announced by the company at the beginning of fiscal 2021 and replaces ‘FRED’. RAD ~~Mobile Control~~™~~: This software platform allows end users~~took it’s first AVA order in June 2020 and expects to ~~access~~deliver it in September. AVA performs FRED tasks and ~~monitor SCOT~~™ ~~features from any portable device~~

▪	~~Where~~’~~s My SCOT~~™~~: For placing and tracking SCOT~~™ ~~from order, through production to delivery status. It is also a tool to use for planning SCOT~~™ ~~placements.~~much more.

~~RAD~~’s ’~~Where~~’~~s My SCOT~~™’ ~~was custom developed so that RAD dealers and end users can have access so that new rental orders can be entered via self-serve.~~

~~Sales & Marketing Strategy~~Software Solutions

RAD has created a variety of front-end and back-end software solutions’ ~~primary use cases include~~ to power its ecosystem. Customer facing software includes RADGUARD (on the ~~following:~~touchscreens of RAD’s field devices) and RADSOC (Security Operations Center) and RADPMC (Property Management Center).


▪	~~Critical infrastructure -~~Boosting the protection of any critical infrastructure site where the end user needs more control over an expansive area. Example applications: Vehicle/manned gates, perimeters, difficult-to-staff locations

▪	~~Home Owner~~’~~s Associations -Providing an inexpensive way to bolster security without breaking the bank, providing eyes and ears to the entrance of a neighborhood without the infrastructure or investment of a human guard.~~

▪	~~Recreational & shopping facilities -RAD~~’s technological capabilities and customizable alerts make it the perfect security solution for high-trafficked recreational facilities such as sports arenas or malls. Example applications: parking areas, entrance areas

▪	~~Corporate Campuses -Security and credential validation capabilities make RAD~~’~~s solutions the perfect security solution for employee and visitor access control. Example applications: parking areas, entrance areas~~

▪	~~Distribution Centers -SCOT~~™ ~~can work for vehicle, visitor and employee entrances, as well as interior/perimeter areas.~~

RAD ~~will primarily use~~has developed a variety of utilities that allow automatic over-the-air updates, most of which is within a back-end application called SCOT Manager.

RAD has written world class Visitor Management, Access Control and other applications instead of seeking to partner with legacy manufacturers. It is RAD’s opinion that the legacy paradigm in the physical space underserves the markets in terms of cost, functionality and integration.

RAD has recently integrated its ~~guarding dealer channel~~own Video Management System into RADSOC that includes full integration to a variety of features related to security and properly management functions.

RAD’s ability to deliver ~~solutions~~easy to use, easy to obtain, and easy to support software, combined with custom workflow-automation applications, is the ~~market. Guarding companies are cognizant~~key to RAD’s value proposition.

Manufacturing & Assembly

RAD uses a variety of domestic and overseas machine shops for raw material procurement and machining of the ~~fact~~required plastic and metal pieces that ~~failure~~build RAD devices.

RAD’s sourcing has redundancy through use of multiple machine shops producing the same products for RAD.

There is no piece of any RAD device that can only be procured from one supplier.

RAD’s margins are based on current small batch production and assembly. Economies of scale will drive greater gross margin as quantities and efficiencies increase.

RAD’s primary assembly and configuration location is in Southern California. It is anticipated that as RAD outgrows its existing facility these functions will be moved out of state, most likely to ~~adopt new technology will severely impact their business in~~mid-west location. RAD’s California location would remain as the ~~future. The guarding partnership model~~West Coast Sales & Service Center.

Anticipated location for a comprehensive assembly location is ~~valuable as it~~Michigan. This location provides ~~RAD with instant~~central access to RAD’s largest markets as well as easy access from RAD’s R&D center outside of Toronto, Canada.

Tariff Impact

Anticipated tariffs of 25% across all imported items, not yet in effect, would impact US production costs by an additional 10%. If this happens RAD anticipates absorbing this cost for US units but supplying Canadian demand from local Canadian production (instead of from the ~~largest consumers of guarding services, the Company’s primary target market. RAD’s dealer network currently totals over 800 reps.~~US).

- 4 -

~~Solutions-As-A-Service Rental Program~~Covid Impact

The company issued a Covid Impact notice on March 24, 2020 that can be found here: https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.11/48b.407.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/covidUpdate.pdf. In summary, Covid accelerated some sales and prospects and stunted others. Overall the company believes that the Covid pandemic will spur the use of innovative cost saving technology such as created by RAD. Indeed, at the time of this writing RAD is engaged in several large and high level discussions with companies actively looking to reduce cost due to the pandemic. RAD expects this to be a general activity of all companies due to the long-term impact of Covid and regardless of if a vaccine is discovered in the short term.

Roadmap

RAD ~~is focused on providing cost-effective, customized options to help organizations achieve their operational~~announced three major hardware solutions in fiscal 2020, specifically ROAMEO, AVA and ~~security goals.~~ROSA.

~~Our~~ “~~Solutions-as-a-Service~~” ~~program includes:~~


▪	~~Comprehensive training for operators and staff that may interact with SCOT~~™ ~~through a combination of online and in-person certification programs.~~

▪	~~Multiple options for customer training with a focus on positive end user solution adoption.~~

▪	~~In-person SOP integration for SCOT~~™ ~~and robot protocols.~~

▪	~~RAD offers complete maintenance and service through the life of the contract. 24/7 technical service support is available online or through RAD sales contacts.RAD’s goal is easy integration of its security solutions that keep an enterprises security team functioning 100% of the time.~~

~~“Solutions-as-a-Service” terms are~~1) RAD announced a return to the mobile unmanned ground vehicle market at the end of July 2019. This ground drone will benefit from significant innovations during the first 12 months ~~to 48 months, with incentives for longer term rental commitments. Available channels include:~~


▪	~~Direct to end user: RAD manages all aspects of deployment.~~

▪	~~Guarding Company Dealer: RAD works with a number of excellent guarding companies that can help ensure its security solutions augment an enterprise~~’~~s guarding force.~~

▪	~~Integrator Dealer: RAD solutions are currently offered to the integrator channel through a partnership with PSA Network.~~ ~~Sales networks: Sales organizations that carry a wide range of solutions through independent sales representatives.~~

~~RAD’s software is provided free to customers with a RAD hardware solution. RAD’s software strategy is to create as many connections as possible, at low cost, so~~following launch. It’s expected these advanced applications will spawn several ‘killer apps’ that will put this unit, and the RAD ~~Software Suite becomes the dominant control system for security and other systems.~~Ecosystem, in high demand. Expect release in September 2021.

~~Artificial Intelligence: Object Recognition~~2) RAD announced the AVA solution as a replacement to FRED.

3) RAD released ROSA, which has subsequently become the highest volume in shortest amount of time RAD solution to date.

In fiscal 2021 RAD released one significant hardware solution and one significant software solution.

RAD released Wally 2.0 with or without the ‘Health Services Option’. Wally 2.0 adds functionality in the way of advanced notification and improved response panel. The Health Services Option includes the ability to record people’s temperature and perform appropriate action based on the person’s skin temperature. This solution has garnered significant interest to date.

RAD released it’s ‘Face Mask Detection & Alert’ software upgrade. This software now runs on all RAD units and can be activated by customers as they see fit. It’s part of RAD’s commitment to provide advanced analytics on a continuous basis.

RAD’s ~~neural network can be customized~~hardware and software have benefited from continuous significant improvements and to date has over 400,000 paid operating hours.

Team and Culture

AITX has built a ~~variety~~strong start-up culture based on performance, sacrifice and rewards. RAD begins every interview with a review of ~~customer needs~~the eight elements that comprise RAD Culture and ~~utilizes best-in-breed AI algorithms from~~candidates are encouraged to understand that this is not a ~~variety~~traditional company. As a startup RAD faces challenges of ~~vendors. RAD’s use~~limited resources and time and as such, the team members are open to multitasking and wearing multiple hats, as the situation demands, thus allowing the management team to focus on the larger goals and steer the company in the right direction. Our solid RAD team, all share in the same beliefs and core values of ~~base level algorithms allows for easy integration~~the Company; so we easily adjust to changes thus giving RAD an edge in the market. The core team really determines the fate of ~~different features for different uses~~a company and ~~ensures that~~ RAD is ~~never reliant on any one vendor.~~no stranger to the difficulties that face a startup, such as unexpected setbacks, delays in funding or a cash crunch. At RAD ~~maintains complete control over its Software Suit~~the whole team has pitched in, doing whatever they can, from working to meet tight deadlines; or willing partaking in financial sacrifices; to assisting where and whenever needed, creating a core team willing to standby the company through the testing times.

RAD’s culture has provided strength throughout the difficult period of robot deployments and the ~~ability~~transition to ~~enhance its features and options.~~2^nd generation solutions.

~~Competition and Competitive Strengths~~Market Environment

~~We are unaware~~RAD experience has proved that the security market is ripe for disruption. Having captured the interest of ~~any comparable solution available today that blends technology, usability, special features and cost while focusing on partnering with industry and law enforcement~~many Fortune 500 companies (names generally protected under NDA) including Microsoft, Verizon, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, among many others, no other known company has the solutions, distribution channel, reputation, sales or support model to ~~effect realistic improvements to security while providing a return on investment.~~rival RAD in the near term.

AsFurthermore, the ~~robotics industry continues to grow one can expect~~launch of RAD’s mobile solutions will create additional significant distance between any would-be competitors. RAD will be a ~~number of new ventures, start-ups,~~one-stop shop for proven and ~~university research programs to develop products that could compete with the Company. Some outside of the security industry believe security robots, stand alone or~~comprehensive mobile ~~compete against closed-circuit television providers, but cameras do not provide a physical presence, are typically used for forensics after an event,~~ and ~~do not offer a client the plethora of capabilities available in the RAD Software Suit/SCOT~~™~~/SOC combination. The Company believes that having these systems working together provides a more effective approach.~~

~~The Company also competes indirectly with private physical security firms that provide clients with security personnel~~stationary workflow improvement devices and ~~other security services. There are more than 8,000 such firms in the U.S. alone. The Company’s SCOT~~™ ~~offers clients a significant cost reduction compared to traditional security guards. In addition, the Company~~’~~s SCOT~~™ offers significantly more capabilities, such as license plate detection, data gathering, and people detection that are delivered consistently, on a 24/7 basis, without human intervention. In most cases, the Company’~~s technology complements and improves the operations of traditional security firms.~~systems.

- 5 -

~~Manufacturing~~RAD’s technology model includes a ‘new paradigm’ for the security industry: Security in a box. Every RAD solution features connection to the RAD Software Suite which is a platform for AI processing, usage analytics, cloud served video, communications interface, audit logs and much more.

Positive market reception for RAD solutions are due to the following existing conditions:


	1.	The security guard industry is characterized by poor customer satisfaction and industry consolidation. It’s self-described to be a ‘race to the bottom’ to provide the lowest cost services to end users because generally speaking end users require some security for general crime deterrent and insurance purposes. There are 1.1M security guards in the United States and the security guard industry represents over $20B in annual sales and the average security guard bill rate is $20/hour.

	2.	Enterprise organizations’ security divisions/groups are continuously challenged to reduce cost. For example, Universal Parcel Service (UPS) spends over $120M/year in security guard services, Lockheed Martin over $60M/year and NBC Universal over $25M/year. The security guard industry has not had any significant disruption or innovation since inception.

	3.	Guarding companies struggle to offer quality service at a reasonable price. Security organizations are eagerly receptive to solutions that improve performance and reduce cost.

	4.	RAD’s device rental model allows clients to immediately save significant operating costs. With RAD’s current stationary solutions retailing from under $1/hour to $5/hour we can immediately provide substantial savings and significant additional security.

	5.	RAD’s services options allow end users to incorporate or fully replace their existing Security Operation Centers with RAD solutions. This integrated with RAD’s “Solutions-As-A-Service” Rental Program offers customized options to help organizations achieve operational and security goals.

The above conditions speak to the historical lack of innovation in the guarding market largely driven by the lack of development of truly revolutionary systems. This market is now positioned for major disruption with the application of AI based solutions, as lead by RAD. As such, the interest in RAD solutions has been overwhelming. Major companies, including the U.S. largest guarding company Allied Universal Services, are aligning with RAD to offer these services to their customer base.

Prospective ROAMEO Impact

The Company’s release of ROAMEO bring it into comparison with Knightscope, a Palo Alto based robotics company in business since 2012. RAD’s approach is very different than Knightscope’s on all elements of technology. RAD believes that it’s pricing is up to 45% less expensive than the K5.

RAD ~~manufactures~~expects that a small amount of ROAMEO orders, which RAD believes it has ‘queued up’ will make a significant impact on RAD’s financial performance and ~~assembles its SCOT~~™ increate momentum for significant adoption of the U.S. The Company has developed a local ecosystem of suppliers with multiple vendors for each category of material, however some items are only available overseas, specifically the tablets and some battery technology. Other items that are purchased in the U.S. have substantial portions built overseas, including, for example, the cameras and speakers.entire RAD ~~is committed to North American sourcing and manufacturing.~~lineup.

RAD Solutions Customer Acceptance

RAD ~~has begun development for manufacturing plans~~end users include one Top 10 company and many Fortune 500 companies. RAD is currently deployed in ~~Michigan, which will allow flexibility for high volume production.~~logistics, commercial real estate, healthcare and retail industries. If RAD deployed to only 5% of any one of these industries facilities the company would enjoy tremendous profitability.

~~Research and Development~~Due to the nature of existing non-disclosure agreements RAD does not normally share customer lists or specific deployment details.

RAD’s batch production of SCOTs & WALLYS have all been committed prior to the completion of the production cycle, with an average delivery time of 45 days. RAD ~~is continuously engaged in research and development. Its family of products is continuously evolving. The first production run, SCOT~~™ ~~version 1.0, and its subsequent deployments,~~ has ~~resulted in SCOT~~™ ~~version 1.2. This latest version of SCOT~~™ ~~includes significant improvements~~set a goal, predicated on regular demand, to ~~power, processing and other physical enhancements. RAD is continuously working towards improving the design and construction of its SCOT~~™’~~s and is working~~reduce delivery time to ~~be GDPR compliant by the end of RAD~~’~~s second fiscal quarter. In addition, RAD is pursuing additional cost savings optimized for mass production.~~15 days.

~~Intellectual Property Protection~~RAD Industry Leadership Role

~~There are no patents filed~~Mr. Reinharz has earned a prominent role as a spokesperson for AI and change in the security industry. He has lectured and participated in several panels for some of the ~~date of this report. RAD plans~~security industries largest events and organizations. Mr. Reinharz sits on the SIA’s Autonomous Working Group committee which is dedicated to ~~file various applications for protection of certain aspects of its intellectual property in~~helping shape the ~~United States.~~

~~Government Approvals~~

~~The Company is not aware of any government approvals applicable to its business~~industry and ~~further is not aware of any pending or threatened investigation, proceeding or action by foreign, federal, state or local agencies, or third parties involving its current operations.~~

~~Environmental Matters~~

The Company is not aware of any environmental regulations applicable to its business and further is not aware of any pending or threatened environmental investigation, proceeding or action by foreign, federal, state or local agencies, or third parties involving its current operations.

~~Description of the Industry~~

~~The Security Guard Industry~~

~~We believe~~support progressive legislation. Most recently Mr. Reinharz provided NY City’s ASIS CPP group a lecture that the outlook for the private security services industry in the U.S. and abroad continues to be upbeat. Worldwide annual spending on private contract security services was estimated at $244 billion for 2016, with the U.S. being the biggest consumer, accounting for 26% or $63.4 billion(1). Security guard services are expected to attract the largest share of overall U.S. security spending through 2019 with security guard and patrol services estimated at $19.4 billion in 2016(1). According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are currently over 1 million security guards employed in the U.S. generating $31.2 billion per year in wages.

~~__________~~

~~(1) Summit Security report~~~~www.summitsecurity.com/looking-forward-security-industry-trends-and-outlook-for-2016-and-beyond/~~.

According to The Freedonia Group, U.S. demand for private contracted security services is expected to rise 4.2% annually through 2019 to $66.9 billion. Systems integration and security consulting is expected to be the fastest growing services, while guarding and alarm monitoring is expected to remain dominant. The non-residential market is expected to remain the largest segment, while the institutional market grows the fastest.qualified as a continuing education credit.

- 6 -

RAD gets exposure to prospects, customers and investors through Mr. Reinharz’s efforts to educate the security market. Blogs and industry published articles can be found in the news section of ~~The Robotics Industry~~www.roboticassistancedevices.com

~~International Data Corporation (“IDC”)~~It is expected that Mr. Reinharz continues his promotion of the new paradigm for the next few years until adoption is widespread.

Financing

RAD has ~~identified robotics~~entered into three royalty revenue agreements and taken on limited additional direct debt to sustain operations and research and development as ~~one~~the company drives towards positive cash flow. Furthermore Steve Reinharz has provided over an additional $250,000 plus 100% deferred earnings during this rebuilding period. Steve Reinharz has received no cash salary and has pledged to receive no salary payouts until RAD has positive cash flow. All RAD employees have also made financial contributions and sacrifices during this period of ~~six Innovation Accelerators~~focus on profitability.

However, positive cash flow cannot fund the pace of expected deployments. As such RAD has been working on alternative funding options. The expected success and durability of RAD’s solutions, and depth and breadth of the sales funnel has attracted the attention of various asset funding companies.

RAD is engaged in supplemental financing efforts based on existing and future streams of revenue that will ~~drive digital transformation by opening new revenue streams and changing~~provide additional non-dilutive funding to the ~~way work is performed. In~~company. As these efforts mature updates will be issued or shared in the new Worldwide Commercial Robotics Spending Guide, IDC forecasts global spending on robotics and related services to grow at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) of 17% from more than $71 billion in 2015 to $135.4 billion in 2019. Such broad-based growth in robotic adoption is being driven by increasing labor costs, shortage of skilled labor, and an increasing emphasis on repeatable quality in conjunction with a reduction in prices of robotic systems and strategic national initiatives. There were over 41,000 professional service robots sold in 2015 valued at $4.6 billion, up 25% from the year before.relevant filings.

~~The service robotics market is expected~~Go To Market Strategy

RAD’s strategy continues to ~~reach $23.9 billion by 2022, growing at~~focus on creation and support of a ~~CAGR of 15.2% between 2016 and 2022~~strong dealer channel. This affords multiple benefits to RAD with ~~professional service robots holding~~few downsides. RAD has successfully integrated through the largest ~~market share~~US guarding company and recently signed another top 3 guarding company as a RAD dealer. Furthermore, RAD has been signing up and developing mid-sized and smaller dealers. RAD is on track to develop a focused group of dealers of which most will exclusively represent RAD solutions.

Supplemental to that RAD will, under certain circumstances, accept subscriptions directly from end users. These situations are largely characterized by the end user not having a guarding company, having a guarding company that RAD does not want as a dealer or other extenuating circumstances. RAD has no desired ratio of dealer vs direct subscriptions. Dealer subscriptions remain the primary focus.

Competition

RAD has no direct competition save for one immediate competitor and one potential competitor..

RAD is considered part of the ~~service robotics market~~‘drones’ category of the security industry although at RAD we consider ourselves to be in ~~2015. Professional service robotics~~the workflow automation industry.

RAD deliberately restricts information that is ~~currently~~public for three main reasons:


	1.	Usually activities are covered by mutual non-disclosure agreements and RAD generally will not ask for permission to publicize customer activities.

	2.	These are generally security applications and most companies prefer to not advertise the details of their security systems.

	3.	Until RAD hits the ‘tipping point’ we prefer to keep our solutions stealthy to some extent so as not to give our would-be competitors tips to copy us.

It is anticipated that at some point some competition may enter the market. RAD seeks to maintain a 2+ year competitive advantage through a broad line of hardware solutions, the fastest and smoothest user interface and the strongest feature set with the most ~~widely developed~~mature back-end. Furthermore RAD seeks to expand its sales staff and ~~deployed application area of service robots~~become the dominant incumbent in ~~terms of~~this new market value. The market is expected to be driven by the increase in demand for logistics applications. However, other emerging professional applications such as telepresence and inspection and maintenance are expected to fuel the overall service robotics market during the forecast period. The security robots market is expected to reach $2.4 billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 8.6% between 2016 and 2022 with North America expected to hold the largest share during this period.that it has created.

Employees

As of June ~~11 2018,~~17, 2020 we ~~had 15 full-time~~have 1 employee, 17 full time contract employees and ~~21 contracted~~4 part time contract employees. None of our employees are represented by a union. We consider our employee relations ~~with our employees~~ to be excellent.

- 7 -

Legal Proceedings

See Item 3—3 - Legal Proceedings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DESCRIBED BELOW AND THE OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS TRANSITIONAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO INVEST IN THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK. ADDITIONAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO THE REGISTRANT OR THAT THE REGISTRANT CURRENTLY DEEMS IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR THE REGISTRANT’S BUSINESS OPERATIONS.

IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS ACTUALLY OCCUR, THE REGISTRANT’S BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED. IN SUCH CASE, THE TRADING PRICE OR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE AND YOU MAY LOSE PART OR ALL OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

~~THE FOLLOWING ALSO CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. PLEASE SEE “CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS”.~~

~~Risks Related~~Pursuant to ~~Our Industry and Our Company~~

~~Our business is at an early stage and we have not yet generated any profits or significant revenues.~~

RAD was formed in 2016 and made its first sale in 2016. Accordingly, the Company has a limited operating history upon which to evaluate its performance and future prospects. Our current and proposed operations are subject to all the business risks associated with new enterprises. These include likely fluctuations in operating results as the Company makes significant investments in research, development and product opportunities, and reacts to developments in its market, including purchasing patternsItem 305(e) of customers, and the entry of competitors into the market. We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient revenue to be profitable in the next three years or at all, which could lead to a loss of part or all of an investment in the Company.

~~- 7 -~~

~~We have a limited number of deployments and our success depends on an unproven market.~~

The market for advanced physical security technology is relatively new and unproven and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. In order to grow our business and extend our market position, we will need to place into service additional robots, expand our service offerings, and expand our presence. Our ability to expand the market for our products depends on a number of factors, including the cost, performance and perceived value associated with our products and services. Furthermore, the public’s perception of the use of robots to perform tasks traditionally reserved for humans may negatively affect demand for our products and services. Ultimately, our success will depend largely on our customers’ acceptance that security services can be performed more efficiently and cost effectively through the use of our robots and ancillary services, of which there can be no assurance.

~~We cannot assure you that we can effectively manage our growth.~~

RAD expects to continue hiring additional employees. The growth and expansion of our business and products create significant challenges for our management, operational, and financial resources, including managing multiple relationships and interactions with users, distributors, vendors, and other third parties. As the Company continues to grow, our information technology systems, internal management processes, internal controls and procedures and production processes may not be adequate to support our operations. To ensure success, we must continue to improve our operational, financial, and management processes and systems and to effectively expand, train, and manage our employee base. As we continue to grow, and implement more complex organizational and management structures, we may find it increasingly difficult to maintain the benefits of our corporate culture, including our current team’s efficiency and expertise, which could negatively affect our business performance.

~~Our costs may grow more quickly than our revenues, harming our business and profitability.~~

We expect our expenses to continue to increase in the future as we expand our product offerings, expand production capabilities and hire additional employees. We expect to continue to incur increasing costs, in particular for working capital to purchase inventory, marketing and product deployments as well as costs associated with customer support in the field. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate which would have a negative impact on our financial position, assets and ability to invest further in the growth and expansion of our business.

~~The loss of one or more of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future, could harm our business.~~

RAD currently depends on the continued services and performance of key members of the management team, in particular, founder and CEO, Steven Reinharz, and Chief Technology Officer, Aziz Sekander. If we cannot call upon them or other key management personnel for any reason, our operations and development could be harmed. The Company has not yet developed a succession plan. Furthermore, as the Company grows, it will be required to hire and attract additional qualified professionals such as accounting, legal, finance, production, service and engineering experts. The Company may not be able to locate or attract qualified individuals for such positions, which will affect the Company’s ability to grow and expand its business.

~~We have no employment agreements in place with our executive officers or directors.~~

We currently do not have any employment agreements in place with our only executive officer and director. Since the Company has no such agreements currently in place, there is a risk that our only executive officer and director may terminate their association with the Company. The loss of our only executive officer and director would have a material and adverse effect on our Company and our business prospects. Further, in the future, the Company may attract additional persons to serve as its executive officers and directors and may negotiate and consummate employment agreements with its executive officers and directors and such agreements may contain issuance of the Company’s securities as part of the compensation, which would lead our shareholders to experience dilution.

Because we do not currently have an audit committee, compensation committee or any other form of corporate governance committee, shareholders will have to rely on our only director, who is not independent, to perform these functions.

We do not have an audit committee, compensation committee or any form of corporate governance committees comprised of an independent director. The Board, which currently consists of our only director, performs these functions as a whole and the only member of the Board is not an independent director.

~~- 8 -~~

~~If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished and our business may be adversely affected.~~

RAD relies and expects to continue to rely on a combination of confidentiality agreements with its employees, consultants, and third parties with whom it has relationships, as well as trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, and domain name protection laws, to protect its proprietary rights. As of the date of this report, there are no patents filed on behalf of the Company. The Company plans to file various applications in the United States for protection of certain aspects of its intellectual property. However, third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights, may challenge proprietary rights held by us and pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we intend to operate in the future. In any or all of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights. Although we plan to take measures to protect our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that others will not offer products or concepts that are substantially similar to those of RAD and compete with our business. If the protection of our proprietary rights is inadequate to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

~~Our financial results will fluctuate in the future, which makes them difficult to predict.~~

RAD’s financial results may fluctuate in the future. Additionally, we have a limited operating history with the current scale of our business, which makes it difficult to forecast future results. As a result, you should not rely upon the Company’s past financial results as indicators of future performance. You should take into account the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by rapidly growing companies in evolving markets. Our financial results in any given quarter can be influenced by numerous factors, many of which we are unable to predict or are outside of our control, including, but not limited to the following:


▪	~~Our ability to maintain and grow our client base;~~

▪	~~Our clients may suffer downturns, financial instability or be subject to mergers or acquisitions;~~

▪	~~The development and introduction of new products by RAD or our competitors;~~

▪	~~Increases in marketing, sales, service and other operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive;~~

▪	~~RAD ability to maintain gross margins and operating margins;~~

▪	~~Changes affecting our suppliers and other third-party service providers;~~

▪	~~Adverse litigation judgments, settlements, or other litigation-related costs; and~~

▪	~~Changes in business or macroeconomic conditions including regulatory changes.~~

~~Our business is subject to data security risks, including security breaches.~~

Our products employ technologies which are subject to various data security risks including security breaches and hacking and we cannot guarantee that our products may not be negatively affected by these risks causing them to suffer damages. Any occurrence of the foregoing may damage our brand and increase our costs. Any of these events or circumstances could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

~~Economic factors generally may negatively affect our operations.~~

The Company is subject to the general risks of the marketplace in which the Company does business. Moreover, the results of operations of the Company will depend on a number of factors over which the Company will have no control, including changes in general economic or local economic conditions, changes in supply of or demand for similar and/or competing products and services, and changes in tax and governmental regulations that may affect demand for such products and services. Any significant decline in general economic conditions or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects that affect industrial and consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. For these and other reasons, no assurance of profitable operations can be given.

~~- 9 -~~

~~Our business success depends on large part on the success of our efforts to rent our products through dealerships.~~

The Company plans to primarily look to rent its robots through dealerships with guarding companies. The Company believes that the guarding partnership model is valuable. The Company currently has such partnerships with 5 dealers and plans to sign on additional dealers. However, there can be no assurance that the Company can successfully secure agreements with dealerships for the use of our products, which could materially impair our sales and our business prospects.

~~We may not be able to develop automatic charging four our products, which could negatively affect our growth strategy.~~

Part of the Company’s growth strategy is to implement automatic charging for our products. The Company plans to implement autonomous charging capabilities for its products as part of its long-term efforts. The Company believes that adding this feature would allow companies to add security to areas that are either not suitable for humans or cost effective for permanent security and thus expanding the market for our products. If the Company cannot implement automatic charging for its products it would impact the size of the market for its products and could negatively affect its growth strategy.

~~We currently face some competition and may face additional competition in the future and if~~Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)), we are not ~~able to compete effectively, our business prospects and operations would be harmed.~~

We are aware of a number of other companies that are already active in our industry and others that are developing physical security technology in the U.S. and abroad that may potentially compete with our technology and services. These, or new, competitors may have more resources than us or may be better capitalized, which may give them a significant advantage, for example, in offering better pricing than the Company, surviving an economic downturn or in reaching profitability. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against existing or emerging competitors. Additionally, existing private security firms may also compete on price by lowering their operating costs, developing new business models or providing other incentives. We cannot give any assurance that we can adequately compete with existing or new competitors which could lead us to expend additional funds toward our marketing efforts and would further adversely affect our business operations.

Our ability to operate and collect digital information on behalf of our clients is dependent on the privacy laws of jurisdictions in which our machines operate, as well as the corporate policies of our clients, which may limit our ability to fully deploy our technologies in various markets.

Our robots collect, store and analyze certain types of personal or identifying information regarding individuals that interact with the machines. While we maintain stringent data security procedures, the regulatory framework for privacy and security issues is rapidly evolving worldwide and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Federal and state government bodies and agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws and regulations affecting data privacy, which in turn affect the breadth and type of features that we can offer to our clients. In addition, our clients have separate internal policies, procedures and controls regarding privacy and data security with which we may be required to ~~comply. Because~~provide the ~~interpretation and application of many privacy and data protection laws are uncertain,~~information required by this Item as it is ~~possible that these laws may be interpreted or applied in~~ a manner that is inconsistent with our current data management practices or the features of our products. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits and other claims and penalties, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our products, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Any inability to adequately address privacy and security concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable privacy and data security laws, regulations, and policies, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage our reputation, inhibit sales, and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed“smaller reporting company,” as defined by the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our clients may limit the use and adoption of, and reduce the overall demand for, our products. Privacy and data security concerns, whether valid or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of our products, particularly in certain industries and foreign countries. If we are not able to adjust to changing laws, regulations, our business may be harmed.

~~Our success depends on the growth of our industry and specifically on the growing adoption and use of physical security technology in general and of our products.~~

The market for products and for physical security technology is relatively unproven and new, as well as being subject to many risks and uncertainties. Our ability to gain growing market acceptance and adoption of our products, depends on the market’s acceptance of physical security technology in general. If we are unable to increase acceptance of our products and if the market for physical security technology generally does not develop we will not be able to sell our products and our financial performance will be adversely affected.

~~- 10 -~~

~~Our shareholders do not have voting control over the Company due to the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of its Series E Preferred Stock.~~

Mr. Parsons, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer currently owns 1,000,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and; Steve Reinharz is the CEO of RAD, and is currently the holder of 3,350,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock. The outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the holders of Series E Preferred Stock have 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders, and therefore our other shareholders do not have voting control over the Company.

~~Risks Related to our Common Stock~~

~~The Company’s continued operations may be dependent on the Company raising additional capital.~~

To the extent that the cash flow from operations are insufficient to fund the Company’s operations, we will be required to raise additional capital through equity or debt financing. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve significant restrictive covenants. The Company’s failure or inability to raise capital when needed, or on terms acceptable to the Company and our shareholders, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all. If we are unable to obtain such financing when needed, in addition to having an adverse effect on our business operations, it would also have a negative adverse effect on the price of our Common Stock.

~~The Company may conduct further offerings in the future, in which case your shareholdings will be diluted.~~

The Company may rely on equity sales of common stock to fund operations. The Company may conduct further equity and/or convertible debt offerings in the future to finance operations or other projects that it decides to undertake. If common stock is issued in return for additional funds, or upon conversion or exercise of outstanding convertible debentures or warrants, the price per share could be lower than that paid by existing common stockholders. The Company anticipates continuing to rely on equity sales of common stock and issuances of convertible debt and/or warrants convertible or exercisable into shares of common stock in order to fund its business operations. If the Company issues additional shares of common stock, your percentage interest in the Company will be lower. This is often referred to as “dilution,” which could result in a reduction in the per share value of your shares of common stock.

~~The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.~~

Volatility in the trading price of our common stock may prevent our shareholders from being able to sell their shares of our common stock at prices equal to or greater than their purchase price. The trading price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for various reasons, including:


▪	~~our operating and financial performance and prospects;~~

▪	~~our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry;~~

▪	~~the public~~’~~s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission;~~

▪	~~changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track our common stock or the stock of other companies in our industry;~~

▪	~~strategic actions by us or our competitors;~~

▪	~~new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;~~

▪	~~changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;~~

▪	~~changes in general economic conditions in the U.S. and global economies or financial markets, including such changes resulting from war or incidents of terrorism; and~~

▪	~~sales of our common stock by us or members of our management team.~~

~~- 11 -~~

In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant impact on the trading price of securities issued by many companies. The changes frequently occur irrespective of the operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the trading price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our business.

~~The Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the future.~~

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings to reinvest in our business. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company’s dividend policy will be reviewed from time to time by the Board of Directors in the context of its earnings, financial condition and other relevant factors. Until the Company pays dividends, which it may never do, its shareholders will not be able to receive a return on shares of our common stock unless they are able to sell them, of which there can be no assurance. In addition, there is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares or that our stockholders will be able to sell their shares of our common stock at all.

Our shares are subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “penny stock” rules that limit trading activity in the market, which may make it more difficult for our shareholders to sell their common stock.

Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. Since our common stock is trading at less than $5.00 per share, we are subject to the penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission that require broker-dealers to deliver extensive disclosure to its customers prior to executing trades in penny stocks not otherwise exempt from the rules. The broker-dealer must also provide its customers with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held by the customer. Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling a penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or accredited investor must make a special suitability determination regarding the purchaser and must receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. Generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000, or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse, is considered an accredited investor. The additional burdens from the penny stock requirements may deter broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our securities, which could limit the liquidity and market price of our securities. These disclosure requirements may cause a reduction in the trading activity of our common stock, which likely would make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their securities.

~~FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.~~

~~In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted~~ Rule 2111 that requires a broker-dealer to have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment is suitable for a customer before recommending the investment. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.229.10(f)(1).

~~Because we are a small company with a limited operating history, stockholders may find it difficult to sell their common stock in the public markets.~~

The number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock s at any given time may be relatively small. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is still relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors, and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would likely be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours. Additionally, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in our securities. As a consequence, there may be periods when trading activity in our common stock is minimal or even non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity. We cannot give you any assurance that an active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that trading levels will be sustained.

~~- 12 -~~

~~We will continue to incur significant costs to ensure compliance with United States corporate governance and accounting requirements.~~

We will continue to incur significant costs associated with our public company reporting requirements, costs associated with applicable corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We expect all of these applicable rules and regulations will result in significant legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

~~An investment in the Company’s common stock is extremely speculative and there can be no assurance of any return on any such investment.~~

An investment in the Company’s common stock is extremely speculative and there is no assurance that investors will obtain any return on their investment. Investors will be subject to substantial risks involved in an investment in the Company, including the risk of losing their entire investment. The market price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in our quarterly operating results, general trends in the market and other factors, many of which we have little or no control over. In addition, broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, business and political conditions, may adversely affect the market for our common stock, regardless of our actual or projected performance.

Our shareholders’ percentage of ownership may become diluted upon conversion of shares of our Series F convertible preferred stock, 1,000 shares of which are currently issued and outstanding and held by Garett Parsons, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and 2,450 shares of which are currently issued and outstanding and held by Steve Reinharz, the CEO of RAD.

Garett Parsons, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is the current holder of 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, and Steve Reinharz, the CEO of RAD, is currently the holder of 2,450 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. As the holders of such stock, Mr. Parsons and Mr. Reinharz, can each, at any time, convert all, but not less than all of their shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company’s common stock determined by multiplying the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on the date of conversion by three and 45 100ths (3.45). The conversion of such shares shall cause substantial dilution to the Company’s current shareholders.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We maintain our corporate offices at ~~1 East Liberty. 6~~^th ~~Floor, Reno,~~701 North Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200,Henderson, Nevada, ~~89501,~~89704 pursuant to a month-to-month lease. Our annual rental cost for this facility is approximately $936 annually. RAD currently maintains an office at 1218-1222 Magnolia Ave, Suite 106 Bldg. H, Corona, California 92881 pursuant to a month to month lease commencing March 1, 2019. RAD’s annual rent is $12,000 per year. RAD maintains a mailing address for 31103 Ranch Viejo Road, Suite d2114 for a nominal fee of $ 264/yr. RAD previously had its offices at 23121 La Cadena Suite B/C Laguna Hills, California 92675, pursuant to a five-year term ending March 31, 2022. Its annual rental cost for this facility iswas approximately $65,000, plus a proportionate share of operating expenses of approximately $35,000 annually. The Company also ~~leases~~leased premises in northern California. The lease iswas for three years, beginning in August 2017, and ~~expires~~would expire in August 2020. The Company ~~shares~~shared these premises with a former supplier who iswas the co-lessee. Through agreement with the supplier, the Company ~~will~~was to pay 75% of the lease costs and the supplier ~~will~~was to pay 25%. The Company’s share of rent costs was approximately $43,000 annually.

On February 1, 2018 the Company entered into an additional lease for premises for a robotic control center. The lease ~~runs~~ran from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2021 for $6,600 annually. At the end of fiscal 2019 the Company terminated all three preceding leases through verbal arrangement with the landlord. Regarding the lease at La Cadena, the Company agreed to a settlement amount to cover unpaid rent, commissions and leasehold improvements paid by the landlord totaling $62,039 to be paid by the Company in 4 monthly installments of $5,000 commencing August 1, 2019 with the remaining balance to be paid in $10,000 monthly installments thereafter. The Company recorded the $62,039 as a loss on settlement. No further liability was recorded for both the northern California and robotic control center leases.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. There are no legal ~~proceeding~~proceedings pending at this time.

~~- 13 -~~

In ~~February 2016, OMVS received notice that it had been sued~~April 2019 the principals of WeSecure filed lawsuit in California Superior Court seeking damages for non-payment balance of sale of WeSecure assets totaling $25,000, unpaid consulting fees payable to the ~~Clark County District Court~~two principals through to September 2019 totaling $125,924, and labor code violations of ~~Nevada.~~$48,434 all totaling $199,358 plus attorney’s fees and damages. The ~~plaintiff alleges that OMVS obtained certain trade secrets~~parties finally settled all claims with a full release for $180,000 in June 2019 payable in 14 monthly instalments as follows:


2019			2020			Total
6/30/19	$	5,000	1/26/2020	$	15,000
7/30/19	$	5,000	2/25/2020	$	15,000
8/29/19	$	7,500	3/26/2020	$	15,000
9/28/19	$	7,500	4/25/2020	$	15,000
10/28/19	$	10,000	5/25/2020	$	20,000
11/27/19	$	10,000	6/25/2020	$	20,000
12/27/19	$	15,000	7/24/2020	$	20,000

Total	$	60,000		$	120,000	$	180,000

As of June 17, 2020 the Company has paid $17,500. As of this filing the September 2019 through ~~a third party also named~~May 2020 instalments are in the suit. OMVS believes the suit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend it. An Arbitration was conducted on May 9, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Trial de Novo, seeking a review of the merit dismissal. It is counsel’s opinion this Trial de Novo is without merit and OMVS should prevail.arrears.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

- 8 -

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

~~OMVS’s~~AITX’s common stock began trading on the “Over the Counter” Bulletin Board (“OTC”) under the symbol ~~“OMVS”~~“AITX” in June ~~2011.~~2011 and as AITX on August 24, 2018. The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the prices of the common stock in the over-the-counter market, as reported and summarized by OTC Markets Group, Inc. On August 24, 2018, the Company undertook a 100:1 reverse stock split and on March 27, 2020 a 10,000:1 reverse split. The share capital has been retrospectively adjusted accordingly to reflect this reverse stock split, except for the conversion price of certain convertible notes as the conversion price is not subject to adjustment from forward and reverse stock splits.

These quotations represent inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions. There is an absence of an established trading market for the Company’s common stock, as the market is limited, sporadic and highly volatile, which may affect the prices listed below.

High

Low
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2018:

Quarter ended February 28, 2018

$
0.12

$
0.05
Quarter ended November 30, 2017

$
0.14

$
0.04
Quarter ended August 31, 2017

$
0.27

$
0.03
Quarter ended May 31, 2017

$
0.08

$
0.02

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2017:

Quarter ended February 28, 2017

$
0.02

$
0.00
Quarter ended November 30, 2016

$
0.10

$
0.01
Quarter ended August 31, 2016

$
0.20

$
0.07
Quarter ended May 31, 2016

$
0.50

$
0.14


	High		Low
Fiscal Year Ended February 29, 2020:
Quarter ended February 29, 2020	$	0.00	$	0.00
Quarter ended November 30, 2019	$	0.00	$	0.00
Quarter ended August 31, 2019	$	0.01	$	0.00
Quarter ended May 31, 2019	$	0.02	$	0.00

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2019:
Quarter ended February 28, 2019	$	0.02	$	0.00
Quarter ended November 30, 2018	$	0.31	$	0.00
Quarter ended August 31, 2018	$	1.56	$	0.12
Quarter ended May 31, 2018	$	7.57	$	0.90

On June ~~8, 2018,~~15, 2020, the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the OTC was $0.01.

Dividends

To date, we have not paid dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, ~~OMVS’s~~AITX’s financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by its Board of Directors.

Holders of Common Stock

As of June ~~8, 2018,~~18, 2020, there were 1365 holders of ~~OMVS’s~~AITX’s common ~~stock.~~stock of which 15 were active. The number of foregoing holders does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of banks, brokers, nominees or other fiduciaries.

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue ~~480,000,000~~5,000,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of ~~$0.001.~~$0.00001. The closing price of its common stock on ~~June 8, 2018,~~July 22, 2020, as quoted by OTC Markets Group, Inc., was ~~$0.01.~~$0.0157. There were ~~154,260,797~~195,549.343 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of ~~June 8, 2018.~~July 22, 2020. All shares of common stock have one vote per share on all matters including election of directors, without provision for cumulative voting. The common stock is not redeemable and has no conversion or preemptive rights. The common stock currently outstanding is validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of common stock will share equally in any balance of its assets available for distribution to them after satisfaction of creditors and preferred shareholders, if any. The holders of the Company’s common are entitled to equal dividends and distributions per share with respect to the common stock when, as and if, declared by the Board of Directors from funds legally available.

- 149 -

Our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and the applicable statutes of the state of Nevada contain a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.

During the year ended February 28, ~~2018,~~2020 and 2019, there was no modification of any instruments defining the rights of holders of the Company’s common stock and no limitation or qualification of the rights evidenced by the Company’s common stock as a result of the issuance of any other class of securities or the modification thereof.

On March 5, 2015, ~~OMVS~~AITX effected a 500-for-1 reverse split, upon its reincorporation in Nevada. Each common shareholder received one common share in the Nevada company for every 500 common shares they held in the Florida company. Fractional shares were rounded up, and each share shareholder received at least 5 shares.

On August 24, 2018, the Company undertook a 100:1 reverse stock split and on March 27, 2020 the Company undertook a 10,000:1 reverse stock split. The share capital has been retrospectively adjusted accordingly to reflect this reverse stock split, except for the conversion price of certain convertible notes as the conversion price is not subject to adjustment from forward and reverse stock splits.

Non-cumulative voting

Holders of shares of the Company’s common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares, voting for the election of directors, can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in that event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table shows the number of shares of common stock that could be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants, the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options and warrants, and the remaining shares available for future issuance.


Plan Category	Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders.	—	—	~~9,000~~1

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders.	—	—	—

Total	—	—	~~9,000~~1

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. The board of directors is authorized to designate any series of preferred stock up to the total authorized number of shares.

Series E Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 4,350,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock. As of the date of this report, there are 4,350,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series E Preferred Stock ranks subordinate to the Company’s common ~~stock.~~stock as to distributions of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. The Series E preferred stock is non-redeemable, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company and does not receive dividends. The outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of ~~common stock.~~equity instruments with voting rights. As a result, the holder of Series E Preferred Stock has 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders.

- 10 -

Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

~~- 15 -~~

not, without first obtaining the approval of the majority of the holders: (a) alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of any capital stock of the Company so as to affect adversely the Series F convertible preferred stock; (b) create any Senior Securities; (c) create any pari passu Securities; (d) do any act or thing not authorized or contemplated by the Certificate of Designation which would result in any taxation with respect to the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock under Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any comparable provision of the Internal Revenue Code as hereafter from time to time amended, (or otherwise suffer to exist any such taxation as a result thereof).

Series G Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 1,000 shares of Series G Preferred Stock. As of the date of this report, there are no shares of Series G Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series G preferred stock does not have voting rights, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company and does not receive dividends. ~~These shares were created after February 28, 2017.~~

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The Transfer Agent for our capital stock is ~~Island Stock Transfer~~Transhare with an address at 15500 Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite ~~301,~~302, Clearwater, Florida 33760. Their telephone number is Office phone: ~~727-289-0010.~~303-662-1112.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The following is a summary of transactions by ~~OMVS~~AITX involving sales of its securities that were not registered under the Securities Act.


Date	Transaction (1)	Principal Converted	Interest Converted	Fees Converted	Total Amount Converted	Shares Issued**
Number of shares outstanding February 28, 2017						18
March 7, 2017	conversion	$1,840	$—	$—	$1,840	1
March 22, 2017	conversion	1,971	—	—	1,971	1
March 27, 2017	cancelation ***	—	—	—	—	(1)
April 3, 2017	conversion	1,487	3,397	—	4,884	1
April 7, 2017	conversion	1,000	—	—	1,000	1
April 20, 2017	conversion	920	—	—	920	1
April 24, 2017	conversion	6,876	—	—	6,876	1
April 26, 2017	conversion	1,130	—	—	1,130	1
May 2, 2017	conversion	1,130	—	—	1,130	1
May 4, 2017	conversion	1,240	—	—	1,240	1
May 4, 2017	conversion	8,854	—	—	8,854	1
May 8, 2017	conversion	9,296	—	—	9,296	1
May 12, 2017	conversion	1,432	—	—	1,432	1
May 15, 2017	conversion	11,661	—	—	11,661	1
May 15, 2017	conversion	1,550	—	—	1,550	2
May 18, 2017	conversion	13,629	—	—	13,629	2
May 23, 2017	conversion	9,684	3,059	—	12,743	1
May 24, 2017	conversion	1,730	—	—	1,730	2
May 30, 2017	conversion	1,890	—	—	1,890	2
June 7, 2017	conversion	1,985	—	—	1,985	2
June 9, 2017	conversion	2,085	—	—	2,085	2
June 12, 2017	conversion	2,185	—	—	2,185	2

- 11 -

(continued)


Date	Transaction (1)	Principal Converted	Interest Converted	Fees Converted	Total Amount Converted	Shares Issued**
June 14, 2017	conversion	2,295	—	—	2,295	2
June 19, 2017	conversion	2,400	—	—	2,400	2
June 20, 2017	conversion	2,500	—	—	2,500	3
June 20, 2017	conversion	3,000	358	—	3,358	—
June 22, 2017	warrant exercise****	—	—	—	—	3
June 28, 2017	conversion	2,800	—	—	2,800	3
June 28, 2017	warrant exercise****	—	—	—	—	3
July 5, 2017	conversion	3,050	—	—	3,050	3
July 6, 2017	warrant exercise****	—	—	—	—	3
July 7, 2017	warrant exercise****	—	—	—	—	—
July 7, 2017	conversion	3,400	—	—	3,400	3
July 26, 2017	conversion	3,500	—	—	3,500	4
July 28, 2017	conversion	9,750	—	—	9,750	1
July 28, 2017	conversion	4,000	—	—	4,000	4
August 2, 2017	conversion	75,000	—	—	75,000	4
August 2, 2017	conversion	75,000	2,483	—	77,483	4
August 4, 2017	conversion	11,184	—	—	11,184	—
August 14, 2017	conversion	4,500	—	—	4,500	5
August 21, 2017	conversion	4,700	—	—	4,700	5
August 29, 2017	conversion	4,900	—	—	4,900	5
September 5, 2017	conversion	26,250	—	—	26,250	5
September 18, 2017	conversion	27,250	—	—	27,250	5
September 27, 2017	conversion	29,000	—	—	29,000	6
October 16, 2017	conversion	30,500	—	—	30,500	6
October 16, 2017	conversion	10,000	—	—	10,000	—
Number of shares outstanding February 28, 2018						124
April 16, 2018	conversion	132,160	—	—	132,160	6
April 26, 2018	conversion	14,500	—	500	15,000	1
May 1, 2018	conversion	26,250	—	—	26,250	3
May 3, 2018	conversion	5,000	—	—	5,000	—
May 7, 2018	conversion	27,900	—	—	27,900	3
May 10, 2018	conversion	32,400	—	—	32,400	4
May 11, 2018	conversion	14,500	—	500	15,000	2
May 15, 2018	conversion	7,060	—	500	7,560	2
May 15, 2018	conversion	8,000	—	—	8,000	1
May 21, 2018	conversion	20,250	—	—	20,250	3
May 22, 2018	conversion	6,075	—	—	6,075	1
May 24, 2018	conversion	13,056	3,300	—	16,356	2
May 30, 2018	conversion	8,182	—	—	8,182	2
May 30, 2018	conversion	15,000	—	—	15,000	3
June 7, 2018	conversion	2,922	—	—	2,922	1
June 18, 2018	conversion	17,000	—	—	17,000	4
June 19, 2018	conversion	14,500	—	500	15,000	3
June 28, 2018	conversion	18,000	—	—	18,000	4
June 28, 2018	cancellation	(7,060)	—	(500)	(7,560)	(2)
July 5, 2018	conversion	14,500	—	500	15,000	4
July 5, 2018	conversion	8,818	—	—	8,818	3
July 11, 2018	conversion	10,200	—	—	10,200	4
July 11, 2018	conversion	14,500	—	500	15,000	5
July 19, 2018	conversion	16,000	—	500	16,500	5
July 19, 2018	conversion	11,000	1,366	—	12,366	4
July 23, 2018	conversion	14,500	—	500	15,000	7
July 25, 2018	conversion	5,000	—	—	5,000	2
July 31, 2018	conversion	11,000	1,455	—	12,455	6
August 24, 2018	conversion	—	15,300	—	15,300	10
August 27, 2018	conversion	5,500	—	500	6,000	10

- 12 -

(continued)


Date	Transaction (1)	Principal Converted	Interest Converted	Fees Converted	Total Amount Converted	Shares Issued**
August 29, 2018	conversion	4,280	—	500	4,780	11
August 30, 2018	conversion	6,000	—	—	6,000	10
August 30, 2018	rounding shares	—	—	—	—	—
August 31, 2018	conversion	20,000	—	—	20,000	11
August 31, 2018	conversion	7,500	—	500	8,000	11
September 5, 2018	conversion	8,800	1,375	—	10,175	13
September 5, 2018	conversion	7,800	—	—	7,800	13
September 7, 2018	conversion	7,000	—	500	7,500	13
September 12, 2018	conversion	5,355	—	—	5,355	15
September 12, 2018	conversion	6,500	—	500	7,000	14
September 13, 2018	conversion	5,395	—	—	5,395	13
September 13, 2018	conversion	3,436	—	500	3,936	14
September 18, 2018	conversion	5,670	—	—	5,670	19
September 20, 2018	conversion	3,448	—	500	3,948	19
September 21, 2018	conversion	6,720	—	—	6,720	19
September 24, 2018	conversion	5,250	—	—	5,250	18
September 26, 2018	conversion	6,132	—	—	6,132	23
September 28, 2018	conversion	3,084	—	500	3,584	23
October 1, 2018	conversion	3,100	—	—	3,100	20
October 3, 2018	conversion	4,030	—	—	4,030	26
October 3, 2018	conversion	2,202	—	500	2,702	25
October 5, 2018	conversion	2,750	485	—	3,235	16
October 5, 2018	conversion	4,449	—	—	4,449	29
October 8, 2018	conversion	8,835	—	—	8,835	105
October 9, 2018	conversion	4,158	—	500	4,658	30
October 10, 2018	conversion	4,988	—	—	4,988	29
October 15, 2018	conversion	5,935	—	—	5,935	33
October 18, 2018	conversion	9,000	—	—	9,000	113
October 19, 2018	conversion	4,400	713	—	5,113	33
October 23, 2018	conversion	9,840	—	—	9,840	317
November 1, 2018	conversion	9,400	—	—	9,400	94
November 5, 2018	conversion	6,195	—	—	6,195	52
November 15, 2018	conversion	7,980	—	—	7,980	95
November 27, 2018	conversion	3,850	724	—	4,574	123
December 6, 2018	conversion	4,056	797	—	4,853	141
December 7, 2018	conversion	2,034	—	—	2,034	66
December 10, 2018	conversion	2,367	—	—	2,367	76
December 10, 2018	conversion	2,333	—	500	2,833	91
December 10, 2018	conversion	1,475	—	500	1,975	91
December 10, 2018	conversion	3,348	—	—	3,348	90
December 11, 2018	conversion	2,489	—	—	2,489	80
December 11, 2018	conversion	4,340	—	—	4,340	140
December 12, 2018	conversion	3,500	—	—	3,500	94
December 12, 2018	conversion	6,600	1,306	—	7,906	213
December 13, 2018	conversion	2,408	—	500	2,908	134
December 13, 2018	conversion	3,426	—	—	3,426	111
December 14, 2018	conversion	4,154	—	—	4,154	134
December 18, 2018	conversion	4,368	—	—	4,368	141
December 19, 2018	conversion	3,100	—	500	3,600	160
December 19, 2018	conversion	1,000	3,348	—	4,348	161
December 20, 2018	conversion	—	—	—	—	130
December 20, 2018	conversion	2,155	—	500	2,655	169
December 20, 2018	conversion	3,636	—	—	3,636	117
December 20, 2018	conversion	7,480	1,520	—	9,000	333
December 24, 2018	conversion	2,970	—	—	2,970	110
December 26, 2018	conversion	3,213	—	—	3,213	143
December 27, 2018	conversion	1,870	1,381	—	3,252	120

- 13 -

(continued)


Date	Transaction (1)	Principal Converted	Interest Converted	Fees Converted	Total Amount Converted	Shares Issued**
December 28, 2018	conversion	3,700	—	500	4,200	227
December 31, 2018	conversion	4,869	—	—	4,869	216
December 31, 2018	conversion	5,365	—	—	5,365	290
January 2, 2019	conversion	7,370	1,562	—	8,932	425
January 7, 2019	conversion	3,360	—	—	3,360	240
January 7, 2019	conversion	3,944	—	—	3,944	290
January 8, 2019	conversion	4,080	—	—	4,080	300
January 9, 2019	conversion	3,161	—	500	3,661	317
January 10, 2019	conversion	3,380	—	—	3,380	325
January 11, 2019	conversion	5,280	1,150	—	6,430	397
January 11, 2019	conversion	3,625	—	—	3,625	290
January 14, 2019	conversion	3,400	—	—	3,400	340
January 15, 2019	conversion	4,100	—	—	4,100	410
January 15, 2019	conversion	4,300	—	—	4,300	430
January 17, 2019	conversion	4,800	—	—	4,800	480
January 22, 2019	conversion	4,435	—	—	4,435	504
January 22, 2019	conversion	4,230	—	—	4,230	470
January 23, 2019	conversion	3,816	—	—	3,816	530
January 25, 2019	conversion	3,781	—	—	3,781	556
January 28, 2019	conversion	3,276	—	—	3,276	585
January 29, 2019	conversion	3,690	—	—	3,690	615
January 29, 2019	conversion	3,870	—	—	3,870	645
January 30, 2019	conversion	4,080	—	—	4,080	680
January 31, 2019	conversion	4,500	—	—	4,500	750
January 31, 2019	conversion	4,290	—	—	4,290	715
February 4, 2019	conversion	4,740	—	—	4,740	790
February 5, 2019	cancellation	(2,658)	—	—	(2,658)	(17)
February 5, 2019	conversion	4,980	—	—	4,980	830
February 12, 2019	conversion	5,340	—	—	5,340	890
February 14, 2019	conversion	5,236	—	—	5,236	935
February 21, 2019	conversion	4,956	—	—	4,956	900
Number of shares outstanding February 28, 2019						20,026
May 6, 2019	conversion	5,768	—	—	5,768	1,030
May 6, 2019	conversion	15,000	—	—	15,000	882
May 6, 2019	conversion	11,900	—	—	11,900	992
May 7, 2019	conversion	6,048	—	—	6,048	1,080
May 7, 2019	conversion	11,900	—	—	11,900	992
May 8, 2019	conversion	6,384	—	—	6,384	1,140
May 8, 2019	conversion	11,800	—	—	11,800	983
May 8, 2019	conversion	7,312	—	500	7,812	1,240
May 9, 2019	conversion	12,500	—	—	12,500	1,136
May 10, 2019	conversion	7,200	—	—	7,200	655
May 8, 2019	conversion	4,400	—	—	4,400	1,000
May 13, 2019	conversion	7,493	—	—	7,493	1,338
May 13, 2019	conversion	12,650	3,786	—	16,436	1,957
May 21, 2019	conversion	3,281	—	—	3,281	586
May 22, 2019	conversion	11,550	3,526	—	15,076	2,094
July 11, 2019	conversion	11,000	3,984	—	14,984	1,921
July 25, 2019	conversion	8,584	—	—	8,584	2,000
July 30, 2019	conversion	16,940	6,350	—	23,290	3,882
July 31, 2019	conversion	9,872	—	—	9,872	2,300
August 2, 2019	conversion	10,301	—	—	10,301	2,400
August 8, 2019	conversion	21,450	8,170	—	29,620	4,937
August 11, 2019	conversion	10,945	—	—	10,945	2,550
August 11, 2019	conversion	5,837	—	—	5,837	1,360
August 12, 2019	conversion	8,800	—	—	8,800	2,750

- 14 -

(continued)


Date	Transaction (1)	Principal Converted	Interest Converted	Fees Converted	Total Amount Converted	Shares Issued**
August 12, 2019	conversion	13,915	5,337	—	19,252	4,011
August 13, 2019	conversion	3,528	—	—	3,528	1,260
August 14, 2019	conversion	5,920	—	—	5,920	2,960
August 15, 2019	conversion	12,650	4,877	—	17,527	5,842
August 15, 2019	conversion	6,200	—	—	6,200	3,100
August 16, 2019	conversion	8,060	—	—	8,060	4,030
August 19, 2019	conversion	6,784	—	—	6,784	4,240
August 20, 2019	conversion	7,136	—	—	7,136	4,460
August 20, 2019	conversion	12,100	4,705	—	16,805	7,002
August 21, 2019	conversion	4,284	5,628	—	9,912	4,690
August 22, 2019	conversion	—	6,348	—	6,348	5,290
August 23, 2019	conversion	—	4,400	—	4,400	5,500
August 26, 2019	conversion	7,810	3,068	—	10,878	9,065
August 26, 2019	conversion	—	3,416	—	3,416	4,270
August 27, 2019	conversion	—	2,240	—	2,240	2,800
August 29, 2019	conversion	—	5,344	—	5,344	6,680
September 3, 2019	conversion	—	5,616	—	5,616	7,020
September 3, 2019	conversion	6,149	2,449	—	8,598	14,329
September 4, 2019	conversion	—	2,956	—	2,956	7,390
September 5, 2019	conversion	—	3,240	—	3,240	8,100
September 6, 2019	conversion	—	3,560	—	3,560	8,900
September 9, 2019	conversion	—	3,752	—	3,752	9,380
September 10, 2019	conversion	—	3,944	—	3,944	9,860
September 10, 2019	conversion	6,826	2,750	—	9,575	15,959
September 11, 2019	conversion	—	4,129	—	4,129	10,300
September 12, 2019	conversion	2,447	2,233	—	4,680	11,700
September 13, 2019	conversion	4,920	—	—	4,920	12,300
September 16, 2019	conversion	2,818	2,342	—	5,160	12,900
September 17, 2019	conversion	—	2,960	—	2,960	7,400
September 18, 2019	conversion	—	4,760	—	4,760	11,900
September 19, 2019	conversion	—	2,920	—	2,920	7,300
September 20, 2019	conversion	202	1,998	—	2,200	5,500
September 25, 2019	conversion	4,506	234	—	4,740	12,600
October 3, 2019	conversion	5,651	349	—	6,000	15,000
October 10, 2019	conversion	3,760	280	—	4,040	10,100
October 25, 2019	conversion	2,584	556	—	3,140	15,700
November 4, 2019	conversion	2,926	354	—	3,280	16,400
November 27, 2019	conversion	2,970	770	—	3,740	18,700
January 3, 2020	conversion	—	2,640	—	2,640	13,200
January 27, 2020	conversion	3,360	—	—	3,360	16,800
February 1, 2020	cancellation	(3,360)	—	—	(3,360)	(16,800)
February 5, 2020	cancellation	—	(640)	—	(640)	(3,200)
February 5, 2020	conversion	—	4,060	—	4,060	20,300
February 29, 2020	rounding shares issuable	—	—	—	—	2,946
Number of shares outstanding February 29, 2020						418,415

__________

* Conversions occur at discounts ranging from 40-50% of average market price

** Shares adjusted for reverse stock splits: 100: 1 on August 24, 2018 and 10,000:1 on March 27, 2020

*** Total proceeds $600

**** Total proceeds $8,922

- 15 -

On August 28, 2017, ~~OMVS~~AITX entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with RAD and Steve Reinharz, as sole stockholder of RAD. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, ~~OMVS~~AITX acquired, on August 28, 2017, 10,000 shares of RAD’s common stock, representing all of RAD’s issued and outstanding capital stock, from Mr. Reinharz in exchange for the issuance by ~~OMVS~~AITX of (i) 3,350,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and, (ii) 2,450 shares of our Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. In connection with the foregoing, the Registrant relied upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder.

During the period from June 1, 2017 through July 25, 2017, ~~OMVS~~AITX issued 8,922,279 shares of common stock upon cashless exercise of warrants held by one of the Company’s lenders who also converted $3,358 in interest and principal for 395,667 shares for a total of 9,317,946 shares issued.

On July 8, 2017, ~~OMVS~~AITX issued a convertible note payable for $200,000 which bears interest at 8% per annum and is due July 6, 2018. The note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a 40% discount to the lowest trading price in during the 20 trading days prior to conversion.

In connection with the foregoing, the Registrant relied upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder.

On February 16, 2017, ~~OMVS~~AITX closed on a Share Purchase Agreement with Capital Venture Holdings LLC (“Capital Venture”), a Wyoming Limited Liability Company, whereby ~~OMVS~~AITX issued Capital Venture 1,000 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, representing all of the issued and outstanding shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock to Capital Venture in consideration for $5,000. Mr. Garett Parsons is the sole and managing member of Capital Venture.

In connection with the foregoing, ~~OMVS~~AITX relied upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder.

Penny Stock Regulations

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. Our Common Stock falls within the definition of penny stock and therefore is subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000, or annual incomes

~~- 16 -~~

exceeding $200,000 individually, or $300,000, together with their spouse). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser’s prior written consent to the transaction. Additionally, for any transaction, other than exempt transactions, involving a penny stock, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. In addition, the broker-dealer must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market-maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the “penny stock” rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our Common Stock and may affect the ability of investors to sell their Common Stock in the secondary market. In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit the investors’ ability to buy and sell our stock.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Registrant and Affiliated Purchasers

We have not repurchased any shares of our common stock during the fiscal year ended February ~~28, 2018.~~29, 2020.

- 16 -

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and Business sections in this report. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

Overview

~~OMVS~~AITX was incorporated in Florida on March 25, 2010. ~~OMVS~~AITX reincorporated into Nevada on February 17, 2015. ~~OMVS’~~AITX’ fiscal year end is February ~~28. OMVS~~28 (February 29 during leap year). AITX is located at ~~1 East Liberty, 6~~^th ~~Floor, Reno, NV 89501~~701 North Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200 Henderson, Nevada, 89074, and our telephone number is 702-990-3271.

~~OMVS’ prior business focus was transportation services and it was exploring the on-demand logistics market by developing a network of logistics partnerships.~~

On August 28, 2017, ~~OMVS~~AITX entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with RAD and Steve Reinharz, as sole stockholder of RAD. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, ~~OMVS~~AITX acquired, on August 28, 2017, 10,000 shares of RAD’s common stock, representing all of RAD’s issued and outstanding capital stock, from Mr. Reinharz in exchange for the issuance by ~~OMVS~~AITX of (i) 3,350,000 shares of its Series E Preferred Stock and, (ii) 2,450 shares of its Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result of the RAD acquisition, RAD is a wholly owned subsidiary of ~~OMVS.~~AITX. As a result of the closing of the RAD acquisition, ~~OMVS~~AITX has succeeded to the business of RAD, in which it purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of RAD. As a result, ~~OMVS’~~AITX’ business going forward will consist of one segment activity which is the delivery of artificial intelligence and robotic solutions for operational, security and monitoring needs.

~~- 17 -~~

The RAD acquisition is being treated as a reverse recapitalization effected by a share exchange for financial accounting and reporting purposes since substantially all of our prior operations were disposed of as part of the consummation of the transaction and therefore no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded. RAD is treated as the accounting acquirer as its stockholders control the Company after the RAD Acquisition, even though the Company was the legal acquirer. As a result, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in these financial statements are those of RAD as if RAD had always been the reporting company.

AITX’s prior business focus was transportation services, and we were previously exploring the on-demand logistics market by seeking to develop a network of logistics partnerships. Following the RAD acquisition described above, the Company took on RAD’s business of applying advanced artificial intelligence (AI) driven technologies, paired with multi-use hardware and supported by custom software and cloud services, to intelligently automate and integrate a variety of high frequency security, concierge and operational tasks.

- 17 -

Results of Operations

The following table shows our results of operations for the ~~year~~years ended February ~~28, 2018, the two months ended~~29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2017 and period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016.~~2019. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.

~~The Company began~~Total revenue for the year ended February 29, 2020 was $260,768, which represented an increase of $146,097 compared to ~~earn revenues~~total revenue of $114,671 for the year ended February 28, ~~2018 of $106,476, but had no revenues~~2019. Although limited by resources the Company continues its efforts to grow its business.

Total gross profit for the ~~period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016 and~~year ended February 29, 2020 was $177,008, which represented an increase of $66,859 compared to total gross profit of $110,149 for the ~~two months~~year ended February 28, ~~2017, since~~2019. The increase is a result of the ~~Company had just begun operations and was still~~increase in ~~product development.~~revenues above.

Operating expenses for the ~~year~~years ended February ~~28, 2018, the two months ended~~29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2017 and period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016, were~~2019 comprised of the following:

~~Net cash used in operating activities~~


	Year Ended February 29, 2020			Year Ended February 28, 2019

Net cash used in operating activities	$	(1,732,023	)	$	(1,804,261	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(17,325	)	$	(202,717	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	1,766,463		$	2,003,397

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended February ~~28, 2018~~29, 2020 was ~~$3,309,230. This~~$1,757,023, which included a net loss of ~~$24,249,001, gain on settlement of debt of $1,175,028 and a change in operating assets of $89,010. These instances of decreases in cash are offset by a~~$6,213,649, non-cash activity such as the change in fair value of derivative ~~financial instruments~~liabilities of ~~$9,495,321 (non-cash)~~$1,127,119, (gain) on settlement of debt of ($159,370), interest expense related to penalties from debt defaults of $314,347, interest expense related to derivative ~~liability on~~liabilities in excess of face value of debt ~~change~~ of ~~$10,797,663,~~$198,492, amortization of debt ~~discounts~~discount of ~~$1,214,348, a loss~~$874,187, (gain) on impairment of fixed assets ($11,515), provision for inventory of ~~$563,556, stock-based compensation of $2,840 and~~$54,702, depreciation and amortization of ~~$130,081.~~$102,241 and change in operating assets and liabilities of $1,956,423.

Net cash used in investing ~~activities~~activities.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020 was ~~$239,490, which~~$17,325. This consisted primarily of ~~capital expenditures~~the purchase of ~~$228,371, cash paid for security deposit~~fixed assets of ~~$30,141 and was~~$26,825 offset by ~~cash~~ proceeds ~~from the WeSecure transaction~~ of ~~$17,000 and cash acquired in reverse capitalization~~disposal of ~~$2,022.~~fixed assets of $9,500.

- 20 -

Net cash provided by financing ~~activities~~activities.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,766,463 for the year ended February ~~28, 2018, was $3,516,586, which resulted from~~29, 2020. This consisted of proceeds from ~~the issuance of~~ convertible notes payable of ~~$2,558,345,~~$25,000, proceeds from loans payable $768,563, proceeds from deferred variable payment obligation of $1,366,500, and net borrowings from loan ~~payable-related~~payable – related party ~~$219,613,~~of $141,290, offset by repayments of loan ~~from OMVS to RAD prior to reverse recapitalization of $752,500, proceeds from vehicle loan $47,661 and was reduced by principal repayment on convertible note~~ payable ~~of $50,000 and payments on a vehicle loan of $11,533.~~$534,890.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any outstanding off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency forward contracts. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or that engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

~~- 20 -~~

Significant Accounting Policies

~~Robot Parts Inventory~~Use of Estimates

Robot parts inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method. The Company records a valuation reserve for obsolete and slow-moving inventory, relying principally on specific identification of such inventory. The Company uses these robot partsIn order to prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the ~~assembly of revenue earning robots~~United States, management must make estimates , judgements and ~~demo robots as well as research and development. Depending on use,~~assumptions that affect the ~~Company will transfer the parts to the corresponding asset or expense if used in research and development. A charge to income is taken when factors that would result in a need for an increase~~amounts reported in the ~~valuation, such as excess or obsolete inventory,~~financial statements and determine whether contingent assets and liabilities, if any , are ~~noted.~~disclosed in the financial statements. The ultimate resolution of issues requiring these estimates and assumptions could differ significantly from resolution currently anticipated by management and on which the financial statements are based. The most significant estimates included in these consolidated financial statements are those associated with the assumptions used to value derivative liabilities.

Revenue Earning ~~Robots~~Devices

Revenue earning ~~robots~~devices are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 48 months. The Company continually evaluates revenue earning ~~robots~~devices to determine whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life or whether the ~~robot~~devices should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses a combination of the undiscounted cash flows and market approaches in assessing whether an asset has been impaired. The Company measures impairment losses based upon the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the respective assets which range from ~~two~~three to five years. Major repairs or improvements are capitalized. Minor replacements and maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend asset lives are expensed currently.


~~Demo robots~~		~~4 years~~
Computer equipment		3 years
Office equipment		4 years
Vehicles		3 years
Leasehold improvements		5 years, the life of the lease

The Company periodically evaluates the fair value of fixed assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Upon retirement or other disposition of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in income.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed in the period they are incurred in accordance with ASC 730, Research and Developmentunless they meet specific criteria related to technical, market and financial feasibility, as determined by Management, including but not limited to the establishment of a clearly defined future market for the product, and the availability of adequate resources to complete the project. If all criteria are met, the costs are deferred and amortized over the expected useful life or written off if a product is abandoned. At February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had no deferred development costs.

- 21 -

~~Revenue Recognition~~Sales of Future Revenues

~~Revenue~~The Company has entered into transactions, as more fully described in footnote 10, in which it has received funding from investors in exchange for which it will make payments to those investors based on the level of sales of certain revenue categories, generally based on a percentage of sales for those certain revenues. The Company determines whether these agreements constitute sales of future revenues or are in substance debt based on the facts and circumstances of each agreement, with the following primary criteria determinative of whether the agreement constitutes a sale of future revenues or debt:


	●	Does the agreement purport, in substance, to be a sale
	●	Does the Company have continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows due the investor
	●	Is the transaction cancellable by either party through payment of a lump sum or other transfer of assets
	●	Is the investors rate of return implicitly limited by the terms of the agreement
	●	Does the Company’s revenue for a reporting period underlying the agreement have only a minimal impact on the investor’s rate of return
	●	Does the investor have recourse relating to payments due

In the event a transaction is ~~recognized when persuasive evidence~~determined to be a sale of ~~an arrangement exists, goods~~future revenues, it is recorded as deferred revenue and amortized using the sum-of-the-revenue method. In the event a transaction is determined to be debt, it is recorded as debt and amortized using the effective interest method. As of the date of these financial statements, the Company has determined that all such agreements are ~~delivered for rental and/or services are rendered, sales price is determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.~~debt.

Revenue Recognition

ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, supersedes the revenue recognition requirements and industry specific guidance under Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). Topic 606 requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Topic 606 defines a five-step process that must be evaluated and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The Company adopted Topic 606 on March 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. Under the modified retrospective method, prior period financial positions and results will not be adjusted. There was no cumulative effect adjustment recognized as a result of this adoption. While the Company does not expect fiscal year 2020 net earnings to be materially impacted by revenue recognition timing changes, Topic 606 requires certain changes to the presentation of revenues and related expenses beginning March 1, 2018. Refer to Note 5 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers for additional information.

Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity

The Company relies on the guidance provided by ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, to classify certain redeemable and/or convertible instruments. The Company first determines whether a financial instrument should be classified as a liability. The Company will determine the liability classification if the financial instrument is mandatorily redeemable, or if the financial instrument, other than outstanding shares, embodies a conditional obligation that the Company must or may settle by issuing a variable number of its equity shares.

Once the Company determines that a financial instrument should not be classified as a liability, the Company determines whether the financial instrument should be presented between the liability section and the equity section of the balance sheet (“temporary equity”). The Company will determine temporary equity classification if the redemption of the financial instrument is outside the control of the Company (i.e. at the option of the holder). Otherwise, the Company accounts for the financial instrument as permanent equity.

Initial Measurement

The Company records its financial instruments classified as liability, temporary equity or permanent equity at issuance at the fair value, or cash received.

Subsequent Measurement – Financial Instruments Classified as Liabilities

The Company records the fair value of its financial instruments classified as liabilities at each subsequent measurement date. The changes in fair value of its financial instruments classified as liabilities are recorded as other income (expenses).

- 22 -

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”) provides a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).

~~- 21 -~~

The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are described as follows:


	●	Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.

	●	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

	●	Level 3 – Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

Measured on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents information about our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fell:


			Fair Value Measurement Using
	Amount at Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
February 29, 2020
Liabilities
Derivative liability – conversion features pursuant to convertible notes payable	$	6,890,688	$	—	$	—	$	6,890,688

February 28, 2019
Liabilities
Derivative liability – conversion features pursuant to convertible notes payable	$	6,170,139	$	—	$	—	$	6,170,139

See Note 12 for specific inputs used in determining fair value.

The carrying amounts of ~~RAD~~’sthe Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and advances, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS give effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options and/or warrants. Diluted EPS excluded all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

- 23 -

Basic loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed in a manner similar to the basic loss per share, except the weighted-average number of shares outstanding is increased to include all common shares, including those with the potential to be issued by virtue of convertible debt and other such convertible instruments. Diluted loss per share contemplates a complete conversion to common shares of all convertible instruments only if they are dilutive in nature with regards to earnings per share.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

~~In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business~~, which amends the current definition of a business. Under ASU 2017-01, to be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contributes to the ability to create outputs. ASU 2017-01 further states that when substantially allSee discussion of the ~~fair value~~adoption of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset (or a group of similar assets), the assets acquired would not represent a business. The new guidance also narrows the definition of the term “outputs” to be consistent with how it is described in Topic 606, ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~. The changes to the definition of a business will likely result in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions. The guidance is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 and to apply it to any transaction, which occurred prior to the issuance date that has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued~~ ASU 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, above.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Modification Accounting for Share-Based Payment Arrangements. The ~~core principle~~standard amends the scope of ~~ASU 2014-09 is that~~modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements and provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity ~~should recognize revenue~~would be required to ~~depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This~~apply modification accounting under ASC 718. The new standard is effective for fiscal years ~~and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue~~~~from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.~~ ~~The amendments in this update deferred the effective date for implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year and is now effective for annual reporting periods~~ beginning after December 15, 2017. ~~Early application is permitted only as~~There was no impact on the financial statements of ~~annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim reporting periods within that period. Topic 606 is effective for~~adopting this new standard on March 1, 2018.

On March 1, 2019 the Company in the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the new revenue recognition guidance. The Company has completed its initial impact assessment and has commenced an in-depth evaluation of the adoption impact, which involves review of selected revenue arrangements. Based on the Company’s preliminary review, the Company believes that the timing and measurement of revenue for its customers will be similar to the Company’s current revenue recognition. However, this view is preliminary and could change based on further analysis associated with the conversion and implementation phases of our ASU 2014-09 project.

~~From March 2016 through September 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),~~ ~~ASU 2016-10,~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,~~ ~~ASU 2016-11,~~Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting,adopted ASU No. ~~2016-12,~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients~~~~, ASU No. 2016-20,~~~~Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~~~and ASU No. 2017-13,~~Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments. These amendments are intended to improve and clarify the implementation guidance of Topic 606. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU No. 2014-09 and ASU No. 2015-14.

~~- 22 -~~

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.~~ 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), which is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company ~~is currently evaluating the effects of~~adopted ASU 2016-02 but does not expect any material impact on ~~its consolidated~~the financial ~~statements.~~statements because the leases commencing March 1, 2019 are month to month.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~August~~September 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-15,~~2016-13, ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments~~Financial Instruments-Credit Losses. ASU ~~2016-15 eliminates~~2016-13 was issued to provide more decision-useful information about the ~~diversity in practice related to~~expected credit losses on financial instruments and changes the classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero-coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization.loss impairment methodology. ASU 2016-15 designates the appropriate cash flow classification, including requirements to allocate certain components of these cash receipts and payments among operating, investing and financing activities. The guidance2016-13 is effective for ~~the Company~~reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2017, although early~~2019 using a modified retrospective adoption method. A prospective transition approach is ~~permitted. The Company is currently evaluating~~required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the ~~effects of ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18,~~~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force~~~~. ASU 2016-18 requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement cash flows. The new standard is expected to be~~ effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-18 on its consolidated financial statements.

~~In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11,~~Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating~~Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity~~, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018.date. The Company is currently assessing the ~~potential~~ impact ~~of adopting ASU 2017-11~~this accounting standard will have on its ~~consolidated~~ financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will adopt this March 1, 2020.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We do not have any financial instruments that are exposed to significant market risk. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in bank deposits and short-term, highly liquid money market investments. A hypothetical 100-basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of our cash equivalents securities, or our earnings on such cash equivalents.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules appearing on pages F-1 through ~~F-22~~F-31 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On ~~February 19, 2018, our Board of Directors approved and ratified the engagement of GBH CPAs, PC~~October 31, 2019, Fruci & Associates II, PLLC (“~~GBH”~~Fruci PLLC”) resigned (‘Termination”) as the ~~Company’s~~ independent registered public accounting firm ~~for~~of Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (the “Company”). The Board of Directors of the ~~Company’s fiscal year ended February 28, 2018, effective immediately,~~Company approved and ~~dismissed Friedman, LLP~~ratified the Termination and the engagement (“~~Friedman”~~Engagement”) of LJ Soldinger & Associates LLC (“LJ Soldinger”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The Engagement is effective immediately.

From ~~September 25, 2017 to February 19, 2018,~~May 13, 2019 through October 31, 2019, there were (i) no disagreements (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between the Company and ~~Friedman~~Fruci PLLC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

- 2324 -

~~Prior to~~On May 13, 2019, the ~~appointment of GBH, on September 25, 2017, our~~ Board of Directors of the Company approved and ratified the engagement of ~~Friedman LLP (“Friedman”)~~Fruci PLLC as ~~our~~the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm ~~for the Company’s fiscal year ending February 28, 2018,~~ effective immediately, and dismissed ~~MaloneBailey,~~Marcum LLP (“~~MaloneBailey”~~Marcum LLP”) as ~~our~~the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

MaloneBailey’s audit report on OMVS’ consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2017, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, other than an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

~~During the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the subsequent interim periods~~From October 18, 2018 through ~~September 25, 2017,~~May13, 2019, there were (i) no disagreements (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between the Company and ~~MaloneBailey~~Marcum LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to MaloneBailey’s satisfaction, would have caused MaloneBailey to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements for such year, and (ii) no “reportable events” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S- K.procedure.

~~During the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the subsequent interim periods through September 25, 2017, neither~~On October 18, 2018, the Company ~~nor anyone acting on~~engaged Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) as its ~~behalf has consulted~~independent registered public accountants. This engagement occurred in connection with ~~Friedman regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on~~ the Company’s ~~financial statements or the effectiveness~~prior independent public accountants, GBH CPAs, PC (“GBH”) resigning, effective July 1, 2018, as a result of ~~internal control over financial reporting, and neither a written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Friedman concluded was an important factor considered~~combining its practice with Marcum. The engagement of Marcum has been approved by the ~~Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter that was~~Audit Committee of the ~~subject~~Company’s Board of ~~a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.~~Directors.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Limitations on Systems of Controls

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses identified in our evaluation, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

~~- 24 -~~


•	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

•	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

•	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

- 25 -

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of U.S. GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: lack of a functioning audit committee; lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and, management is dominated by a single individual. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of February ~~28, 2018.~~29, 2020.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

This report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended February 28, ~~2018~~2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

~~- 25 -~~

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth the names, positions and ages of our directors and executive officers as of the date of this report. Our directors serve for one year and until their successors are elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by the board of directors to a term of one year and serve until their successor is duly elected and qualified, or until they are removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.


Name	Age	Position(s)
Garett Parsons	3436	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director

Biographical information concerning our director and executive officer listed above is set forth below.

- 26 -

Garett Parsons.Mr. Parsons has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and member of our board of directors since February 2017. Mr. Parsons has over 10 years of financial consulting for both private and public equity markets. Mr. Parsons has extensive experience in the field of asset valuation, funding structures and public release document generation. His education includes a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science/Economics from California State University Sacramento and an Associate of Arts in Liberal Studies/ Business San Joaquin Delta College and West Hills College.

There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers and directors. During the past 10 years, Mr. Parsons was involved in any of the legal proceedings listed in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K. There are no arrangements or understandings between Mr. Parsons and any other person pursuant to which he was or is to be selected as an executive officer or director.

Board Committees and Director Independence

As Mr. Parsons serves as our sole director, we do not have a separately designated audit committee, compensation committee or nominating and corporate governance committee. The functions of those committees are being undertaken by our sole director. Because we do not have any independent directors and have only one director, our sole director believes that the establishment of committees of the Board would not provide any benefits to our company and could be considered more form than substance.

We currently do not have any non-employee or independent directors, as such term is defined in the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, and we do not anticipate appointing additional directors in the near future.

Our sole director is not an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. As with most small, early stage companies until such time our company further develops its business, achieves a stronger revenue base and has sufficient working capital to purchase directors and officer’s insurance, the Company does not have any immediate prospects to attract independent directors. When the Company is able to expand our Board of Directors to include one or more independent directors, the Company intends to establish an Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. It is our intention that one or more of these independent directors will also qualify as an audit committee financial expert. Our securities are not quoted on an exchange that has requirements that a majority of our Board members be independent, and the Company is not currently otherwise subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors, nor are we required to establish or maintain an Audit Committee or other committee of our Board of Directors.

Procedures for Nominating Directors

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board since the most recently completed fiscal quarter. We do not have a policy regarding the consideration of any director candidates that may be recommended by our stockholders, including the minimum qualifications for director candidates, nor has our sole director established a process for identifying and evaluating director nominees. We have not adopted a policy regarding the handling of any potential recommendation of director candidates by our stockholders, including the procedures to be followed. Our sole director has not considered or adopted any of these policies, as we have never received a recommendation from any stockholder for any candidate to serve on our Board of Directors. Given our relative size and lack of directors and officers insurance coverage, we do not anticipate that any of our stockholders will make such a recommendation in the near future.

While there have been no nominations of additional directors proposed, in the event such a proposal is made, all current members of our Board will participate in the consideration of director nominees.

~~- 26 -~~

Director Qualifications

Mr. Parsons was appointed to our board in February 2017. Mr. Parsons has significant operational experience in our industry and brings both a practical understanding of the industry and as well as hands-on experience in our business sector to our board and a greater understanding of certain of the challenges we face in executing our growth strategy.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

We have adopted a code of ethics meeting the requirements of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We believe our code of ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the provisions of the code of ethics.

- 27 -

Director Compensation

Mr. Parsons, our sole director, does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director. We reimburse our directors for all reasonable ordinary and necessary business-related expenses, but we did not pay director’s fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director during the ~~year~~years ended February 28, ~~2018 or the two months ended~~2019 and February ~~28, 2017~~29, 2018 to any of the individuals serving on our Board during that period. We have no standard arrangement pursuant to which our directors are compensated for their services in their capacity as directors. We may pay fees for services rendered as a director when and if additional directors are appointed to the Board of Directors.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common shares and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations that no other reports were required, and to the best of our knowledge, we believe that all of our officers, directors, and owners of 10% or more of our common stock filed all required Forms 3, 4, and 5.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in the past two fiscal years for Mr. Parsons, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial ~~Officer and Mr. Wilson, our former Chief Executive~~ Officer.

~~2018~~2019 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary or Fees ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)	Year	Salary or Fees ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Garett Parsons,	2018	69,768	—	—	—	—	—	—	69,768	2020	132,690	—	—	—	—	—	—	132,690
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (1)	2017	2,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	2,000	2019	101,410	—	—	—	—	—	—	101,410

Robert Wilson,	2018	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Former Chief Executive Officer (2)	2017	120,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	120,000

__________


(1)	Mr. Parsons was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ~~on February 16, 2017.~~
~~(2)~~	~~Mr. Wilson ceased to be an executive officer~~ on February 16, 2017.

Employment Agreements

We are not currently a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Parsons, our sole executive officer. We may enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Parsons in the future, however. We have no plans providing for the payment of any retirement benefits.

- 2728 -

Outstanding Equity Awards at ~~2018~~2020 Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for Mr. Parsons, our sole executive officer outstanding as of February ~~28, 2018:~~29, 2020:


OPTION AWARDS						STOCK AWARDS
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Garett Parsons	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

At February ~~28, 2018, OMVS~~29, 2020, AITX had ~~125,004,554~~418,415 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020, and reflects:


●	each of our executive officers;

●	each of our directors;

●	all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and

●	each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Information on beneficial ownership of securities is based upon a record list of our stockholders and we have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. We believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws, except as otherwise provided below.


Name	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)	Percent of Class (2)	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)	Percent of Class (2)
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Garett Parsons (3)	125,004,554	22.47%	195,549,343	22.47%
Robert Wilson (4)	—	0.0%
All executive officers and directors as a group (1 persons)	125,004,554	22.47%	195,549,343	22.47%

5% Stockholders:
Steve Reinharz (5)	306,261,157	55.06%
23121 La Cadena Suite B/C, Laguna Hills, California 92675
Steve Reinharz (4)			479,095,890	55.06%
c/o Robotic Assistance Devices

~~__________~~

(1)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Beneficial ownership also includes shares of stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. In determining the percent of common stock owned by a person or entity as of the date of this Report, (a) the numerator is the number of shares of the class beneficially owned by such person or entity, including shares which may be acquired within 60 days on exercise of warrants or options and conversion of convertible securities, and (b) the denominator is the sum of (i) the total shares of common stock outstanding on as of ~~the date of this Report 125,004,554~~July 22, 2020 195,549,3435 shares, and (ii) the total number of shares that the beneficial owner may acquire upon exercise of the derivative securities. Unless otherwise stated, each beneficial owner has sole power to vote and dispose of its shares.

- 2829 -


(2)	Based on ~~125,004,554~~195,549,343 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding as of ~~the date of this report.~~July 22, 2020.

(3)	~~Mr. Wilson ceased to be an officer and director in February 2017 and sold his shares in the market to unrelated parties.~~

~~(4)~~	Mr. Parsons is the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and owns 1,000,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and 1,000 shares of our Series F Preferred Stock. If Mr. Parsons converted the 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series F Preferred stock, he would receive ~~431,265,711~~195,549,343 shares of the Company’s common stock, which is included in the chart above as if such conversion has occurred. Further, the outstanding shares of Series E preferred stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the holder of Series E preferred stock has 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders.

~~(5)~~(4)	Steve Reinharz is the CEO of RAD and is the holder of (i) 3,350,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and, (ii) 2,450 shares of our Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. If Mr. Reinharz converted the 2,450 shares of the Company’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, he would receive ~~306,261,157~~479,095,890 shares of the Company’s common stock, which is included in the chart above as if such conversion has occurred. Further, the outstanding shares of Series E preferred stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the holder of Series E preferred stock has 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We do not have a written policy for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related parties or conflicted transactions. When such transactions arise, they are referred to our board of directors for its consideration.

~~The sole shareholder and owner of RAD loaned RAD certain funds to pay for RAD’s expenses. The loans are non-interest bearing and unsecured, with no specific terms of repayment or collateral.~~ For the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company received net advances of ~~$219,613~~$141,290 and $218,890, respectively, from its loan ~~payable to a related~~payable-related party. At February 29, 2020, the loan payable-related party was $1,310,358 and $782,844 at February 28, ~~2018 and 2017,~~2019. Included in the balance due to the related party is $656,334 of deferred salary and interest, $426,000 of which bears interest at 12%. At February 28,2018 there was ~~$316,142,~~$352,392, with $210,000 bearing interest at 12%. The accrued interest included at February 29, 2020 was $50,730 (2018- $13,650).

During the years ended February 29, 2020 and ~~$62,529, respectively.~~February 28, 2019, the Company was charged $484,251 and $484,251, respectively in consulting fees for research and development to a company owned by a principal shareholder.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

On October 31, 2019, Fruci & Associates II, PLLC (“Fruci PLLC”) resigned (‘Termination”) as the independent registered public accounting firm of Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (the “Company”). The Board of Directors of the Company approved and ratified the Termination and the engagement (“Engagement”) of LJ Soldinger & Associates LLC (“LJ Soldinger”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The Engagement is effective immediately.

On May 13, 2019, the Board of Directors of the Company approved and ratified the engagement of Fruci PLLC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm effective immediately, and dismissed Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

On October 18, 2018, the Registrant engaged Marcum as its independent registered public accountants. This engagement occurred in connection with the Company’s prior independent public accountants, GBH CPA’s resigning, effective July 1, 2018, as a result of combining its practice with Marcum. The engagement of Marcum has been approved by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

On September 25, 2017, our Board of Directors approved and ratified the engagement of GBH CPAs, PC (“~~GBH CPAs”~~GBH”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending February 28, 2018, effective immediately, and dismissed ~~MaloneBailey~~Malone Bailey as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

- 30 -

The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided by ~~MaloneBailey and GBH CPAs~~LJ Soldinger for the fiscal ~~years~~year ended February ~~28, 2018 and 2017.~~29, 2020.


	2018		2017		2020
Audit Fees					$	72,500
MaloneBailey	$	—	$	30,000
GBH CPAs		25,000		—
Total Audit Fees		25,000		30,000
Audit-Related Fees		—		—		—
Tax Fees		—		—		—
All Other Fees		—		—		—
Total	$	25,000	$	30,000	$	72,500

Audit Fees - This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees - This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category would include consultation regarding correspondence with the SEC, other accounting consulting and other audit services.

~~- 29 -~~

Tax Fees - This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

All Other Fees - This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

As part of its responsibility for oversight of the independent registered public accountants, the Board has established a pre-approval policy for engaging audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accountants. In accordance with this policy, each type of audit, audit-related, tax and other permitted service to be provided by the independent auditors is specifically described and each such service, together with a fee level or budgeted amount for such service, is pre-approved by the Board. All of the services provided by ~~MaloneBailey~~LJ Soldinger, Fruci,,Marcum, GBH and ~~GBH CPAs~~MaloneBailey described above were approved by our Board.

The Company’s principal accountant did not engage any other persons or firms other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are listed in the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules on page F-1 and included on pages F-2 through ~~F-22.~~F-31.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are either not required under the related instructions, are not applicable (and therefore have been omitted), or the required disclosures are contained in the financial statements included herein.

- 3031 -

(3) Exhibits.


Exhibit No.		Description of Document
2.1		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 28, 2017, by and among the registrant, Steve Reinharz and Robotic Assistance Devices Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 31, 2017).

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of the registrant filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on September 8, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).

3.2		Plan and Agreement of Merger of ~~On the Move Systems Corp.~~Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (a Florida corporation) and ~~On the Move Systems Corp.~~Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (a Nevada corporation). (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).

3.3		Bylaws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168530), filed with the Commission on August 4, 2010).

3.4		Certificate of Designations filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on February 8, 2017. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).

3.5		Certificate of Designations filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 3, 2017. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).

3.6		Amendment to Certificate of Designations filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 3, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 12, 2017).

10.1		Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 31, 2017 and entered into between the Company and Capital Venture Holdings LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).

14.1		Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the registrant’s registrant statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168530), filed with the Commission on August 4, 2010).

21.1		List of Subsidiaries. *

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

101.INS		XBRL Instance **

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema **

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation **

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition **

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels **

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation **

__________


*	Filed or furnished herewith.
**	ToIn accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be ~~submitted by amendment.~~deemed “furnished” and not “filed.”

- 3132 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

Date: ~~June 13, 2018~~July 31, 2020	By:	/s/ Garett Parsons
		Garett Parsons
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Garett Parsons	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)	~~June 13, 2018~~July 31, 2020
Garett Parsons

- 3233 -

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

(FORMERLY ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.)

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets	~~F-3~~F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations	~~F-4~~F-5

Consolidated Statement of ~~Changes in~~ Stockholders’ Deficit	~~F-5~~F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	~~F-6~~F-7

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	~~F-7~~F-8

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING ~~FIRM~~FIRMS

To the ~~stockholders~~Shareholders and ~~the board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors of

~~On The Move Systems Corp.~~

~~Reno, Nevada~~Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheets~~sheet of ~~On The Move Systems Corp.~~Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of February ~~28, 2018 and 2017,~~29, 2020, the related consolidated ~~statements~~statement of operations, ~~changes in~~ stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year ended February ~~28, 2018 and for the two months ended February 28, 2017,~~29, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February ~~28, 2018 and 2017,~~29, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended February ~~28, 2018 and for the two months ended February 28, 2017,~~29, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 2, the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, incurred significant operating and cash flow losses and needs to raise additional capital to sustain operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might become necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with the adoption of new lease accounting standards within ASC 842.

Basis for Opinion

These ~~consolidated~~ financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our ~~audits.~~audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our ~~audits~~audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our ~~audits~~audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our ~~audits~~audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our ~~audits provide~~audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~Other Matters~~/s/ LJ Soldinger Associates, LLC

Deer Park, IL

July 28, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (“the Company”) as of February 28, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows the year ended February 28, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 28, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended February 28, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying ~~consolidated~~ financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has ~~suffered recurring losses from operations~~an accumulated deficit, negative working capital, and ~~has a net capital deficiency that~~management does not anticipate positive cash flows in the near future. These factors raise substantial doubt about ~~its~~the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.2 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ ~~GBH CPAs, PC~~Fruci & Associates II, PLLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor ~~since 2018.~~during 2019 and resigned on October 31, 2019.

~~GBH CPAs, PC~~

~~www.gbhcpas.com~~Spokane, Washington

~~Houston, Texas~~

~~June~~October 30, 2019, except as to the 10,000 to 1 reverse stock split disclosed under “Stockholders’ Deficit” in Note 13 ~~2018~~to the consolidated financial statements, of which the date is July 28, 2020.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses. ASU 2016-13 was issued to provide more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and changes the loss impairment methodology. ASU 2016-13 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 using a modified retrospective adoption method. A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the impact this accounting standard will have on its financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will adopt this March 1, 2020.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements~~4. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

~~In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition~~Revenue is earned primarily from two sources: 1) direct sales of ~~a Business~~~~, which amends the current definition~~goods or services and 2) short-term rentals. Direct sales of a business. Under ASU 2017-01, to be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contributes to the ability to create outputs. ASU 2017-01 further states that when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset (or a group of similar assets), the assets acquired would not represent a business. The new guidance also narrows the definition of the term “outputs” to be consistent with how it is described ingoods or services are accounted for under Topic 606, ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~~~. The changes to the definition of a business will likely result in more acquisitions being~~and short-term rentals are accounted for as asset acquisitions. The guidance is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 and to apply it to any transaction, which occurred prior to the issuance date that has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.under Topic 842which was adopted. On March 1, 2019.

~~Recently Issued~~As disclosed in the revenue recognition section of Note 4 – Accounting ~~Pronouncements~~

~~In May 2014,~~Polices, the ~~FASB issued ASU 2014-09,~~Company adopted Topic 606 in accordance with the effective date on March 1, 2018. Note 4 includes disclosures regarding the Company’s method of adoption and the impact on the Company’s financial statements. Revenue ~~from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The core principle~~is recognized on direct sales of ~~ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of~~goods or services when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration ~~to which~~ the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods ~~and~~or services. ~~This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue~~~~from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral~~

Upon adoption of ~~the Effective Date.~~ ~~The amendments~~Topic 842, also referred to above in this update deferred the effective date for implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year and is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim reporting periods within that period. Topic 606 is effective forNote 4, the Company ~~in the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. The Company~~accounts for revenue earned from rental activities where an identified asset is currently evaluating the new revenue recognition guidance. The Company has completed its initial impact assessment and has commenced an in-depth evaluation of the adoption impact, which involves review of selected revenue arrangements. Based on the Company’s preliminary review, the Company believes that the timing and measurement of revenue for its customers will be similartransferred to the ~~Company’s current revenue recognition. However, this view is preliminary~~customer and ~~could change based on further analysis associated with~~ the ~~conversion and implementation phases of our ASU 2014-09 project.~~

~~From March 2016 through September 2017,~~customer has the ~~FASB issued ASU 2016-08,~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),~~ ~~ASU 2016-10,~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,~~ ~~ASU 2016-11,~~~~Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant~~ability to ~~Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting,~~ ~~ASU No. 2016-12,~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients~~~~, ASU No. 2016-20,~~~~Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~~~and ASU No. 2017-13,~~Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments. These amendments are intended to improve and clarify the implementation guidance of Topic 606. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU No. 2014-09 and ASU No. 2015-14.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,~~~~Leases (Topic 842)~~, which is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an assetcontrol that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)~~

~~NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,~~~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments~~. ASU 2016-15 eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero-coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. ASU 2016-15 designates the appropriate cash flow classification, including requirements to allocate certain components of these cash receipts and payments among operating, investing and financing activities. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2017, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18,~~~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force~~. ASU 2016-18 requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement cash flows. The new standard is expected to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-18 on its consolidated financial statements.

~~In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11,~~Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating~~Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity~~, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2017-11 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

~~Subsequent Events~~asset.

The Company recognizes revenue from its rental operations on a straight line basis over the term for each individual robotic device, as the Company has ~~evaluated all transactions through the~~determined that to date, ~~the financial statements were issued~~its leases for ~~subsequent event disclosure consideration.~~these devices are classified as operating leases.

~~4. PREPAID EXPENSES AND DEPOSITS~~The following table presents revenues from contracts with customers disaggregated by product/service:

~~Prepaid expenses and deposits on robots expected to be received within one year were comprised of the following:~~

February 28, 2018

February 28, 2017

Deposits on robots

$
—

$
150,000

Prepaid insurance

22,076

—

Prepaid travel

10,488

—

Prepaid trade show expenses

50,539

—

$
83,103

$
—

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)~~

~~NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~


	Year Ended February 29, 2020		Year Ended February 28, 2019
Device rental activities	$	234,956	$	114,261
Direct sales of goods and services		25,812		410
	$	260,768	$	114,671

5. REVENUE EARNING ROBOTS

Revenue earning robots consisted of the following:


	February 28, 2018		February 28, 2017			February 29, 2020			February 28, 2019
Revenue earning robots	$	—	$	85,050
Revenue earning devices						$	362,259		$	229,958
Less: Accumulated depreciation		—		(3,544	)		(123,088	)		(42,784	)
	$	—	$	81,506		$	239,171		$	187,174

During the year ended February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020, the Company made total additions to revenue earning ~~robots~~devices of ~~$384,588. Additions to~~$132,301 including $106,476 in inventory transfers. The company disposed of a revenue earning robots for the two months ended February 28, 2017 were $85,050 and for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016 were $0. Due to all the revenue earning robots becoming non-operational through February 28, 2018, the Company wrote down revenue earning robots withdevice having a net book value of ~~$414,746 to $0 as loss~~$3,500 for $9,500 and recorded a gain on ~~impairment~~disposal of ~~fixed assets.~~

~~Depreciation expense was $51,348 for~~$6,000. During the year ended February 28, ~~2018, $3,544~~2019, the Company made total additions to revenue earning devices of $229,958.

Depreciation expense for these devices was $80,305 and $22,107 for the ~~two months~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2017 and $0 for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016.~~2019.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consisted of the following:


	February 28, 2018			February 28, 2017			February 29, 2020			February 28, 2019
Automobile	$	136,318		$	47,702		$	41,953		$	40,953
Computer equipment		17,361			—			20,262			20,262
Office equipment		11,829			—			5,680			5,680
Leasehold improvements		29,329			—
		194,837			47,702			67,895			66,895
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(36,632	)		(2,650	)		(51,637	)		(29,701	)
	$	158,205		$	45,052		$	16,258		$	37,194

During the year ended February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020, the Company ~~acquired total~~made additions to fixed assets of ~~$335,043. Additions~~$1,000. During the year ended February 28, 2019, the Company made additions to fixed assets ~~for the two months ended February 28, 2017 were $~~of $2,900 and ~~for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016 were $0. Due to all the demo robots becoming non-operational through February 28, 2018, the Company wrote down~~wrote-off fixed assets ~~with~~having a net book value of ~~$148,810 to $0 as~~$25,938 and recorded a corresponding loss on impairment of fixed assets. The company transferred automobiles having a net book value of $38,405 to vehicles for disposal since they will be given back to the lender in the future.

Depreciation expense was ~~$73,080~~$21,936 and $58,177 for the ~~year~~years ended February ~~28, 2018, $2,650 for the two months ended~~29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2017, and $0 for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016.~~2019, respectively.

7. ~~INTANGIBLE ASSETS~~DEFERRED VARIABLE PAYMENT OBLIGATION

~~Intangible assets consisted~~On February 1, 2019 the Company entered into an agreement with an investor whereby the investor would pay up to $900,000 (including $192,500 paid in January and February 2019) in exchange for a perpetual 9% rate payment (Payments) on the Company’s reported quarterly revenue from operations excluding any gains or losses from financial instruments (Revenues). If the total investor advances turns out to be less than $900,000, this would not constitute a breach of the ~~following:~~agreement, rather the 9% rate would be adjusted on a pro-rata basis. The investor has agreed to pay the remaining balance in minimum $60,000 monthly installments, concluding November 30, 2019. At February 29, 2020 the investor has advanced the full $900,000.

February 28, 2018

February 28, 2017

Intangible asset

$
61,901

$
—

Less accumulated amortization

(5,653
)

—

$
56,248

$
—

On May 9, 2019 the Company entered into two similar arrangements with two investors:


	(1)	The investor would pay up to $400,000 in exchange for a perpetual 4% rate Payment on the Company’s reported quarterly Revenues. If the total investor advances turns out to be less than $400,000, this would not constitute a breach of the agreement, rather the 4% rate would be adjusted on a pro-rata basis. The investor has agreed to pay the remaining balance in four monthly installments of $64,111 starting July 1, 2019. At February 29, 2020, $400,000 has been paid to the Company.

	(2)	The investor would pay up to $50,000 in exchange for a perpetual 1.11% rate Payment on the Company’s reported quarterly Revenues. If the total investor advances turns out to be less than $50,000, this would not constitute a breach of the agreement, rather the 1.11% rate would be adjusted on a pro-rata basis. The investor has agreed to pay the remaining balance in four monthly installments of $8,014 starting July 1, 2019. At February 29, 2020, $50,000 has been paid to the Company.

These variable payments (Payments) are to be made 30 days after the end of each fiscal quarter. If the Payments would deplete RAD’s available cash by more than 30%, the Payments may be deferred for up to 12 months after the quarterly report at an interest rate of 6% per annum on the unpaid amount.

In the event that at least 10% of the assets of the Company are sold by the Company, the investors would be entitled to the fair market value (FMV) of all future Payments associated with the assets sold as determined by an independent valuator to be chosen by the investors. The FMV cannot exceed 30% of the total asset disposition price defined as the total price paid for the assets plus all future Payments associated with the assets sold. In the event that the common or preferred shares are sold by the Company to a third party as to effect a change in control, then the investors must be paid the FMV of all future Payments in one lump payment. The FMV cannot exceed 30% of the share disposition price defined as the total price the third party paid for the shares plus the total value of all future Payments.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On ~~October 2, 2017,~~November 18, 2019 the Company ~~acquired goods and other intangibles through an asset purchase agreement~~entered into another similar arrangement with ~~WeSecure Robotics, Inc. (“WeSecure”)~~the (February 1, 2019) investor above whereby the investor would advance up to $225,000 in exchange for ~~$125,000 payable~~a perpetual 2.25% rate Payment on the Company’s quarterly Revenues

(commencing on quarter ending May 31, 2020). At February 29, 2020 the investor has advanced $109,000 and the investor advanced the $116,000 remainder as of May 2020.

On December 30 , 2019 the Company entered into another similar arrangement with a new investor whereby the investor would advance up to $100,000 in ~~5 monthly $25,000 installments commencing in October 2017 and ending~~exchange for a perpetual 1.00% rate Payment on the Company’s quarterly Revenues (commencing quarter ended November 30, 2020). At February ~~2018. The intangible asset primarily consisted of customer relationships and lists acquired as~~29, 2020 the investor has advanced $50,000 with the remainder to be advanced no later than June 30, 2020. If the total investor advances turns out to be less than $100,000, this would not constitute a ~~part~~breach of the ~~asset purchase agreement. The Company is treating this transaction as~~agreement, rather the 1.00% rate would be adjusted on a ~~business combination The Company is treating this transaction as a business combination under ASU 2017-01 – Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business.~~pro-rata basis.

~~Under~~On April 22 , 2020 the ~~asset purchase agreement,~~Company entered into another similar arrangement with the ~~two principals of WeSecure were also hired on at will basis: one as a sales director~~(first May 9, 2019) investor above whereby the investor would advance up to $100,000 in exchange for a ~~salary of $8,000 per month and~~perpetual 1.00% rate Payment on the ~~other as a consultant at $1,000 per month. The salary~~Company’s quarterly Revenues. At February 29, 2020 the investor has been committed to until September 1, 2019, regardless of employment within the Company. In addition, the two principals will receive collectively a commission of $500/month for each SMP robot rented by an identified customer for one year, as long as the customer staysadvanced $50,000 with the ~~Company for two years and an additional year of commission if the two principals remain employed with the Company through September 1,~~remainder advanced on April 28, 2020. They will also receive a commission of 5% net revenues on sales to identified customers for non-SMP robots for 2 years. In addition, the Company agreed to issue 450,000 options to the two principals to purchase shares its common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share that vest on October 2, 2021 (see further discussion in Note 14).

The Company ~~acquired~~retains total involvement in the ~~following net assets and liabilities as a part~~generation of cash flows from these revenue streams that form the basis of the payments to be made to the investors under this agreement. Because of this, ~~transaction:~~the Company has determined that the agreements constitute debt agreements. As of February 29, 2020, the Company has not yet completed its assessment of the likely cash flows under these agreements, and thus, has not yet determined the effective interest rate under these agreements. The Company expects to have completed its analysis of the expected cash flows prior to the filing of the year end February 28, 2021 filing. As of February 29, 2020, and February 28, 2019, the balances under these agreements were $1,559,000 and $192,500, (including $2,108 current portion, described below) respectively.

Assets Acquired:

Cash

$
17,000

Robots, parts, and equipment

46,099

Intangible assets

61,901

Total assets acquired

$
125,000

Liabilities Assumed:

Acquisition cost

$
125,000

Total liabilities assumed

$
125,000

~~Amortization expense was $5,653 for~~For the year ended February ~~28, 2018, and $0 both~~29, 2020, $1,366,500 has been paid to the Company bringing the balance to $1,559,000 at February 29, 2020.

The Payments will first become payable on June 30, 2019 (unless otherwise indicated) based on the quarterly Revenues for the ~~two months~~quarter ended ~~February 28, 2017 ,~~May 31, 2019 and ~~for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016.~~

At February 28, 2018, the Company had made four payments totaling $100,000, with a remaining balance due of $25,000 that has been included on the balance sheet as balance due on acquisition to WeSecure. The acquisition was to be fully paid at February 28, 2018 per the agreement, however no notices have been sent.

~~8. NOTE RECEIVABLE~~

On March 13, 2017, the Company loaned $40,000 to a third party. The note bore interest at 18% per annum and was payable on April 13, 2017. The note was not repaid by the due date. The note was subsequently amended to bear interest of 2% per month plus a $10,000 fee. The note was payable on December 31, 2017 and is secured in senior rank on all assets of the borrower. The Company evaluated the note receivable to determine whether its lending activities create a variable interest entity that would require consolidation and determined that it does not create a variable interest entity. The third party is in the process of repaying the loan and expects to have the funds available as a result of the commencement of principal business operations in the near term.

~~9. CUSTOMER DEPOSITS~~

will accrue every quarter thereafter. As of February ~~28, 2017,~~29, 2020, the Company ~~received a $10,000 deposit from a customer towards~~has accrued approximately $30,534 in Payments (February 28, 2019 -$2,108). No amounts have been recorded to date as interest, as the ~~rental of equipment with an expected delivery in the third quarter of calendar year 2018.~~amounts are immaterial.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~10.~~8. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible notes payable consisted of the following:


						Balance			Balance							Balance			Balance
			Interest	Conversion		February 28,			February 28,				Interest	Conversion		February 29,			February 28,
Issued		Maturity	Rate	Rate per Share		2018			2017			Maturity	Rate	Rate per Share		2020			2019
February 28, 2011		February 26, 2013 *	7%	$0.015		$	32,600		$	—		February 26, 2013 *	7%	$0.015		$	—		$	32,600
January 31, 2013		February 28, 2017 *	10%	$0.010			119,091			—		February 28, 2017 *	10%	$0.010	⁽³⁾		119,091			119,091
May 31, 2013		November 30, 2016 *	10%	$0.010			261,595			—		November 30, 2016 *	10%	$0.010	⁽³⁾		261,595			261,595
November 30, 2013		November 30, 2017	10%	$0.010			—			—
August 31, 2014		November 30, 2016 *	10%	$0.002			355,652			—		November 30, 2016 *	10%	$0.002	⁽³⁾		355,652			355,652
November 30, 2014		November 30, 2016 *	10%	$0.002			103,950			—		November 30, 2016 *	10%	$0.002	⁽³⁾		103,950			103,950
February 28, 2015		February 28, 2017 *	10%	$0.001			63,357			—		February 28, 2017 *	10%	$0.001	⁽³⁾		63,357			63,357
May 31, 2015		August 31, 2017	10%	$1.000			65,383			—		August 31, 2017*	10%	$1.000	⁽³⁾		65,383			65,383
August 31, 2015		August 31, 2017	10%	$0.300			91,629			—		August 31, 2017*	10%	$0.300	⁽³⁾		91,629			91,629
November 30, 2015		November 30, 2018	10%	$0.300			269,791			—		November 30, 2018*	10%	$0.300	⁽³⁾		269,791			269,791
February 3, 2016		February 3, 2017 *	5%	49% discount	(2)		—			—
February 29, 2016		February 28, 2019	10%	60% discount	(2)		95,245			—		February 28, 2019*	10%	60% discount	⁽²⁾		95,245			95,245
March 22, 2016		March 22, 2017	10%	$0.003			—			—
May 31, 2016		May 31, 2019	10%	$0.003			35,100			—		May 31, 2019*	10%	$0.003	⁽³⁾		35,100			35,100
July 18, 2016		July 18, 2017	10%	$0.003			3,500			—		July 18, 2017*	10%	$0.003	⁽³⁾		3,500			3,500
September 6, 2016		September 6, 2017	10%	$0.003			—			—
December 31, 2016		December 31, 2020	8%	35% discount	(2)		65,000			65,000		December 31, 2020	8%	35% discount	⁽²⁾		65,000			65,000
January 4, 2017		January 4, 2018	0%	—			—			—
January 13, 2017		October 13, 2017	0%	50% discount	(1)		—			—
January 15, 2017		January 15, 2021	8%	35% discount	(2)		50,000			50,000		January 15, 2021	8%	35% discount	⁽²⁾		50,000			50,000
January 15, 2017		January 15, 2021	8%	35% discount	(2)		100,000			100,000		January 15, 2021	8%	35% discount	⁽²⁾		100,000			100,000
January 16, 2017		January 16, 2021	8%	35% discount	(2)		150,000			150,000		January 16, 2021	8%	35% discount	⁽²⁾		150,000			150,000
March 1, 2017		March 1, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		—			—
March 3, 2017		October 3, 2017	8%	40% discount	(1)		—			—
March 8, 2017		March 8, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		—			—
March 8, 2017		March 8, 2020	10%	40% discount	(2)		100,000			—		March 8, 2020	10%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		100,000			100,000
March 9, 2017		March 9, 2021	8%	35% discount	(2)		50,000			—		March 9, 2021	8%	35% discount	⁽²⁾		50,000			50,000
March 21, 2017		March 21, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		30,000			—
April 4, 2017		December 4, 2017	10%	40% discount	(2)		12,066			—
April 19, 2017		April 19, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		96,250			—		April 19, 2018*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		—			96,250
April 20, 2017		January 30, 2018	8%	40% discount	(1)		28,000			—
April 26, 2017		April 26, 2018	0%	$0.001			67			—		April 26, 2018*	0%	$0.001			68			68
May 1, 2017		May 1, 2021	8%	35% discount	(2)		50,000			—		May 1, 2021	8%	35% discount	⁽²⁾		50,000			50,000
May 4, 2017		May 4, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		150,000			—		May 4, 2018*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		22,610			131,450
May 15, 2017		May 15, 2018	0%	$0.001			1,280			—		May 15, 2018*	0%	$0.001			1,280			1,280
May 17, 2017		May 17, 2020	10%	40% discount	(1)		85,000			—		May 17, 2020	10%	40% discount	⁽¹⁾		85,000			85,000
June 7, 2017		June 7, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		200,000			—		June 7, 2018*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		156,764			180,964
June 16, 2017		June 16, 2018	0%	$0.001			750			—		June 16, 2018*	0%	$0.001			750			750
July 12, 2017		July 12, 2018	0%	$0.001			—			—
July 8, 2017		July 8, 2018	8%	40% discount			200,000			—
July 28, 2017		July 28, 2018	15%	$0.001			—			—
July 31, 2017		July 31, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		—			—
July 6, 2017												July 6, 2018*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		200,000			200,000
August 8, 2017		August 8, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		125,000			—		August 8, 2018*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		125,000			125,000
July 28, 2017		July 28, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		116,875			—		July 28, 2018*	15%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		47,913			—
August 29, 2017		August 29, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		247,500			—		August 29, 2018*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		162,250			147,500
September 1, 2017		September 1, 2018	0%	lower of 50% discount/$0.005			187,000			—
September 12, 2017		September 12, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		128,000			—
September 25, 2017		September 25, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		398,750			—
October 4, 2017		May 4, 2018	8%	40% discount	(2)		150,000			—		May 4, 2018*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		150,000			150,000
October 16, 2017		October 16, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		345,000			—		October 16, 2018*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		328,537			204,067
November 22, 2017		November 22, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		500,250			—		November 22, 2018*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		550,275			500,250
December 28, 2017		December 28, 2017	10%	40% discount	(2)		60,500			—		December 28, 2017*	10%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		57,008			28,150
December 29, 2017		December 29, 2018	15%	50% discount	(2)		330,000			—		December 29, 2018*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		363,000			330,000
January 9, 2018		January 9, 2019	8%	40% discount	(2)		82,500			—		January 9, 2019*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾⁽¹⁾		79,508			79,508
January 30, 2018		January 30, 2019	15%	50% discount	(2)		300,000			—		January 30, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾⁽¹⁾		330,000			300,000
February 21, 2018		February 21, 2019	15%	50% discount	(2)		300,000			—		February 21, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾⁽¹⁾		330,000			300,000
March 14, 2018												March 14, 2019*	10%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		50,000			50,000
June 7, 2017												June 9, 2019*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		200,000			200,000
April 9, 2018												April 9, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		60,500			55,000
March 21, 2017												March 21, 2018*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		40,000			40,000
April 20, 2018												April 20, 2019*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		97,659			65,106
May 2, 2018												December 2, 2018*	10%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		70,682			70,682
May 4, 2018												May 4, 2019*	12%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		123,750			123,750
May 14, 2018												December 14, 2018*	10%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		33,542			33,542
May 23, 2018												May 23, 2019*	10%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		110,000			110,000
June 6, 2018												June 6, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		282,949			282,949
June 19, 2018												March 19, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		43,125			87,274
July 6, 2017												June 9, 2019*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		200,000			200,000
August 1, 2018												August 1, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		35,750			32,500
August 23, 2018												August 23, 2019*	8%	45% discount	⁽²⁾		70,123			77,435
September 13, 2018												June 30, 2019*	12%	45% discount	⁽²⁾		9,200			79,500
September 17, 2018												March 17, 2019*	10%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		4,945			4,945
September 20, 2018												September 20, 2019*	15%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		43,285			39,350
September 24, 2018												June 24, 2019*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		63,913			44,000
August 8, 2017												June 9, 2019*	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		125,000			125,000
November 8, 2018												August 15, 2019*	12%	45% discount	⁽²⁾		79,500			79,500
November 26, 2018												May 26, 2019*	10%	50% discount	⁽²⁾		44,799			44,798
August 29. 2019												August 29. 2020	8%	40% discount	⁽²⁾		26,250			—
																	6,834,228			6,767,461
							6,136,681			365,000
Less: current portion of convertible notes payable	Less: current portion of convertible notes payable						(5,536,582	)		—	Less: current portion of convertible notes payable						(6,734,227	)		(6,202,461	)
Less: discount on noncurrent convertible notes payable	Less: discount on noncurrent convertible notes payable						(505,039	)		—	Less: discount on noncurrent convertible notes payable						(30,486	)		(302,105	)
Noncurrent convertible notes payable, net of discount	Noncurrent convertible notes payable, net of discount					$	95,060		$	365,000	Noncurrent convertible notes payable, net of discount					$	69,515		$	262,895

Current portion of convertible notes payable	Current portion of convertible notes payable					$	5,536,582		$	—	Current portion of convertible notes payable					$	6,734,227		$	6,202,461
Less: discount on current portion of convertible notes payable	Less: discount on current portion of convertible notes payable						(3,418,636	)		—	Less: discount on current portion of convertible notes payable						(120,602	)		(718,015	)
Current portion of convertible notes payable, net of discount	Current portion of convertible notes payable, net of discount					$	2,117,946		$	—	Current portion of convertible notes payable, net of discount					$	6,613,625		$	5,484,446

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

__________


*	The indicated notes were in default as of ~~February28, 2018 and bear default~~February 29, 2020. Default interest ~~of between 18% and 25% per annum.~~rate 24%

(1)	The note is convertible beginning six months after the date of issuance.

(2)	The notes are convertible at a discount (as indicated) to the average market price and are accounted for and evaluated under ASC 480 as discussed in Note 3.

(3)	The conversion price is not subject to adjustment from forward or reverse stock splits.

During the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company incurred ~~total~~ original issue discounts of ~~$251,500~~$1,250 and $85,143, respectively, and debt discounts from derivative ~~discounts~~liabilities of ~~$3,106,385.~~$26,250 and $1,668,025, respectively, related to new convertible notes payable. These amounts are included in discounts on convertible notes payable and are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the convertible notes payable. During the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company recognized interest expense related to the amortization of debt discount of ~~$1,102,430.~~$874,187 and $4,641,181, respectively. The Company recorded penalty interest of $313,347 during the year February 29, 2020 (February 28, 2019-$352,943) that is payable upon maturity if not already converted or settled prior to maturity.

All of the notes above are unsecured. As of February ~~28, 2018,~~29, 2020, the Company had total accrued interest payable of ~~$750,509,~~$2,922,894, of which ~~$694,592~~$2,778,583 is classified as current and ~~$55,917~~$144,311 is classified as noncurrent. As of February 28, 2019, the Company had total accrued interest payable of $1,476,050, of which $1,390,706 is classified as current and $85,344 is classified as noncurrent.

~~In September 2017,~~See description below for description of the convertible notes issued during the years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019.

Convertible notes issued

The Company determined that the embedded conversion features which result in a variable conversion rate, in the convertibles notes described below should be accounted for as derivative liabilities as a result of their variable conversion rates.

During the year ended February 29, 2020, the Company ~~settled~~had the ~~March 8, 2017~~following convertible note and paid $72,762, including the remaining $50,000 of principal balance and $1,929 in accrued interest, and a prepayment penalty of $20,833. The Company incurred this penalty to avoid additional costs related to the conversion of this note. The Company recorded a gain on settlement of debt of $84,507 related to the write-off of the associated derivative liability.activity:


●	On September 5, 2019, the Company received $25,000 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $26,250, including an original issue discounts of $1,250 and maturing August 29, 2020. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has an 8% per annum interest rate.

●	The Company wrote off a note payable for $32,600 and related interest of $97,139. The note has matured in February 2013, the company cannot contact the lender and the note is legally prescribed. A gain on settlement of debt of $129,739 was recorded The Company determined that certain Texas state legal requirements were met that allow the Company to treat the liability as no longer enforceable against the Company.

●	The company recorded default penalties totaling $314,347 as increases to various notes, with a corresponding charge to interest.

●	During the year ended February 29, 2020, holders of certain convertible notes payable elected to convert a total of $254,118 of principal, $244,050 accrued interest, and $500 of fees into 395,443 shares of common stock. No gain or loss was recognized on conversions as they occurred within the terms of the agreement that provided for conversion. Immediately prior to the conversion, the Company performed a valuation of the derivative liability attached to the notes and accrued interest converted and determined that the final derivative liability was $440,294. Upon conversion this amount was transferred from derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the year ended February 28, 2019, the Company had the following convertible note activity:

On January 5, 2018, the Company ~~repaid~~issued a convertible promissory note to an investor with an aggregate principal amount of $250,000, due on January 5, 2019 for cash proceeds of $225,000 payable in tranches, with an original issue discount of $25,000. Each tranche matures one year after disbursement. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company and a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 25 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 10% per annum interest rate commencing on January 5, 2018. On March 14, 2018, this note was amended to include the issuance of warrants to purchase 333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.15 with a 3-year maturity, and to change the date of the note to March 14, 2018, coinciding with the payment of the first tranche of $50,000 including cash proceeds of $43,000, fees of $2,000 and an original issue discount of $5,000.

On March 1, 2018, the Company issued a convertible redeemable note to an investor with an aggregate principal amount of $95,000, due on March 1, 2019 for cash proceeds of $95,000. The promissory note is convertible into units of the Company comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock with a three-year maturity and a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 15% per annum interest rate.

In March 2018 and April 2018, an investor paid the Company $200,000 in exchange for a June 7, 2017 back-end note for $200,000, whose maturity was extended to June 9, 2019. The note is convertible into common shares of the Company and a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has an 8% per annum interest rate.

On April 9, 2018, the Company issued a convertible redeemable note to an investor with an aggregate principal amount of $55,000, due on April 9, 2019 for cash proceeds of $55,000. The promissory note is convertible into units of the Company comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock with a three-year maturity and a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 15% per annum interest rate.

In April 2018, the Company received $76,000 of proceeds from an investor for two back-end notes ~~payable~~with a total principal amount of ~~$50,000.~~$80,000, including original issue discounts of $4,000 and a one-year maturity. The back-end notes are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and have an 8% per annum interest rate.

On May 2, 2018, the Company received $70,000 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $77,000, including an original issue discounts of $7,000 and an eight-month maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 10% per annum interest rate.

On May 4, 2018, the Company received $71,500 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $82,500, including an original issue discounts of $11,000 and a one-year maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 12% per annum interest rate.

On May 23, 2018, the Company received $90,108 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $110,000, including an original issue discounts of $19,892 and an eight-month maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 10% per annum interest rate.

In July and August 2018,and December 2018 the Company received $180,000 of proceeds from an investor for a back-end note date July 6, 2017 principal amount of $200,000, including original issue discounts of $20,000 and a June 30, 2019 maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has an 8% per annum interest rate.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In July and August 2018, the Company received $32,500 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $32,500, and a one-year maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 15% per annum interest rate commencing on August 1, 2018.

On September 13, 2018, the Company received $50,000 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $53,000, including an original issue discounts of $3,000 and a nine-month maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 45% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 12% per annum interest rate.

On September 20, 2018, the Company received $39,350 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $39,350 and a one-year maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 15% per annum interest rate.

On September 24, 2018, the Company received $40,000 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $44,000, including an original issue discounts of $4,000 and a nine-month maturity. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 40% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 8% per annum interest rate.

On November 1, 2018, the Company received $50,000 of proceeds from an investor for a promissory note with a principal amount of $53,000, including an original issue discounts of $3,000 maturing August 15, 2019. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 45% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 12% per annum interest rate.

On November 30, 2018, the Company received $118,750 of proceeds from an investor for a back-end promissory note dated August 8, 2017 with a principal amount of $125,000, including an original issue discounts of $6,250 maturing June 9, 2019. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 40% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 8% per annum interest rate.

During the year ended February 28, ~~2018, a debt holder transferred debt of $337,958 and accrued interest of $147,713 to a third party who exchanged it for new~~2019, the Company also had the following convertible note for $300,000, maturing September 1, 2018 and bearing no interest. A gain on settlement of debt of $1,090,521 was recorded that includes the amount of associated derivative liability that was written off.activity:


●	A debt holder transferred debt of $344,040, including accrued interest, to third parties who exchanged it for new convertible notes totaling $344,040, $100,000 with a one-year maturity, maturing on April 17, 2019, bearing interest at 8% per annum and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion; $144,404, with a one-year maturity, maturing on April 20, 2019, bearing interest at 8% per annum, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 30 trading days prior to conversion; and $100,000 with an eight-month maturity, maturing on December 14, 2018, bearing interest at 10% per annum, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 55% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 30 trading days prior to conversion. A gain on settlement of debt of $268,145 was recorded that includes the amount of associated derivative liability that was written-off.

●	A debt holder transferred debt of $299,200, including accrued interest, to third parties who exchanged it for a replacement convertible note totaling $299,200, a one-year maturity, maturing on September 25, 2018, and bearing interest at 15% per annum. The replacement convertible note is convertible into units of the Company comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock with a three-year maturity and a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion. A loss on settlement of debt of $484,484 was recorded that includes the amount of associated derivative liability that was written-off.

●	A debt holder transferred debt of $132,149, including accrued interest, to third parties who exchanged it for a replacement convertible note totaling $132,149, with an eight-month maturity, maturing on March 19, 2019, bearing interest at 15% per annum, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion. A gain on settlement of debt of $71,100 was recorded that includes the amount of associated derivative liability that was written-off.

~~Conversions to common stock~~

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the year ended February 28, 2018, holders of certain convertible note payables elected to convert principal and accrued interest in the amounts shown below into shares of common stock. No gain or loss was recognized on conversions as they occurred within the terms of the agreement that provided for conversion.

Conversion Date

Principal
Converted

Interest
Converted

Total Amount
Converted

Shares
Converted

September 5, 2017

$
26,250

$
—

$
26,250

5,250,000

September 18, 2017

27,250

—

27,250

5,450,000

September 27, 2017

29,000

—

29,000

5,800,000

October 16, 2017

30,500

—

30,500

6,100,000

October 16, 2017

10,000

—

10,000

416,667

$
123,000

$
—

$
123,000

23,016,667


●	The Company exchanged a replacement note issued on April 17, 2018 with a principal of $100,000 and a one-year maturity, maturing on April 17, 2019, and bearing interest at 8% per annum for another replacement note issued on August 23, 2018 with a principal of $100,000 and a one-year maturity, maturing on August 23, 2019, and bearing interest at 8% per annum, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 55% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 30 trading days prior to conversion. A gain on settlement of debt of $90,629 was recorded that includes the amount of associated derivative liability that was written-off.

●	A debt holder transferred debt of $103,984, including accrued interest, to third parties who exchanged it for new convertible notes totaling $344,040: $50,000 with a six-month maturity, maturing on March 17, 2019, bearing interest at 10% per annum, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion; $53,984, with a six-month maturity, maturing on May 26, 2019, bearing interest at 10% per annum, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion. A gain on settlement of debt of $121,305 was recorded that includes the amount of associated derivative liability that was written-off.

●	The Company settled a September 1, 2017 note for repayment $125,000, and a gain of $64,441 was recorded due to the associated derivative liability that was written-off.

●	During the year ended February 28, 2019, holders of certain convertible note payables elected to convert principal and accrued interest in the amounts shown below into shares of common stock. No gain or loss was recognized on conversions as they occurred within the terms of the agreement that provided for conversion. Accordingly, for the year ended February 28, 2019, holders of certain convertible notes payable elected to convert a total of $803,905 of principal and $35,782 accrued interest, and $12,000 of fees into 19,901 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,043 shares of common stock (see Note 18 for detail of warrants issued).

During the year ended February 28, 2018 and prior to the reverse merger, the Company canceled 600,000 shares of common stock. The shares had been issued during the year ended February 28, 2017 for the conversion of principal of a convertible note payable of $600. As a result of the shares being canceled, $600 was added back to the principal of the note.

~~11.~~9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company received net advances of ~~$219,613~~$141,290 and $218,890, respectively, from its loan ~~payable to a related~~payable-related party. At February 29, 2020, the loan payable-related party was $1,310,358 and $782,844 at February 28, ~~2018,~~2019.As of February 29, 2020, included in the balance due to the related party is $656,334 of deferred salary and interest, $426,000 of which bears interest at 12%. At February 28,2019 there was ~~$316,142, and $62,529~~$352,392, with $210,000 bearing interest at 12%. The accrued interest included at February ~~28, 2017.~~29, 2020 was $50,730 (2019- $13,650).

During the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company ~~paid $236,853~~was charged $95,562 and $484,251, respectively in consulting fees for research and development to a company owned by a principal shareholder.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)~~

~~NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~12.~~10. OTHER DEBT – VEHICLE LOANS

In December 2016, RAD entered into a vehicle loan for $47,704 secured by the vehicle. The loan is repayable over 5 years maturing November 9, 2021, and repayable $1,019 per month including interest and principal. In November 2017, ~~the Company~~RAD entered into another vehicle loan secured by the vehicle for ~~$47,704.~~$47,661. The loan is repayable over 5 years, maturing October 24, 2022 and repayable at $923 per month including interest and principal. The principal repayments made were ~~$11,533~~$0 and $5,746 for the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018.~~2019, respectively. Regarding the second vehicle loan , the vehicle was returned at the end of fiscal 2019 and the car was subsequently sold by the lender for proceeds of $21,907 which went to reduce the outstanding balance of the loan. A loss of $3,257 was recorded as well. A balance of $21,578 remains on this vehicle loan at February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019. For the first vehicle loan , the vehicle was retired in 2020, the proceeds of the disposal of $18,766 was applied against the balance of the loan with a $5,515 gain on the remaining asset value of $13,251. A balance of $16,943 remains on this vehicle loan at February 29, 2020 and $35,708 at February 28, 2019. The remaining total balances of the amounts owed on the vehicle ~~loan~~loans were ~~$82,162~~$38,522 and ~~$46,034~~$57,287 as of February ~~28, 2018~~29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2017,~~2019, respectively, of which ~~$17,830 and $7,900~~all were classified as ~~current~~current. The Company ceased making payments of principal and ~~$64,332~~interest in fiscal 2019 and ~~$38,134 as long-term, respectively.~~the company has returned the remaining vehicles to the financing company for disposal.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~13.~~11. LOANS PAYABLE

Loans payable at February 29, 2020 consisted of the following:


						Annual
						Interest
Date	Maturity	Description		Principal		Rate
June 11, 2018	June 11, 2019	Promissory note	(3)	$	48,000	25%	*
August 10, 2018	September 1, 2018	Promissory note			10,000	25%	*
August 16, 2018	August 16, 2019	Promissory note	(1)		12,624	25%	*
August 16, 2018	October 1, 2018	Promissory note			10,000	25%	*
August 23, 2018	October 20, 2018	Promissory note	(21)		25,000	20%	*
October 10, 2018	December 10, 2018	Promissory note	(8)		—	20%	*
October 11, 2018	October 11, 2019	Promissory note	(10)		17,000	20%	*
August 5, 2019	March 11, 2020	Factoring Agreement	(4)		27,025	(4)	*
July 22, 2019	November 15, 2019	Factoring Agreement	(9)		—	(9)
July 9, 2019	January 5, 2020	Factoring Agreement	(5)		—	(5)
September 17, 2019	November 26, 2019	Factoring Agreement	(13)		—	(13)	*
November 12, 2019	August 11, 2020	Factoring Agreement	(14)		74,392	(14)	*
December 20, 2019	March 5, 2020	Factoring Agreement	(18)		7,480		*
October 17,2019	April 29, 2020	Factoring Agreement	(15)		29,252	(15)	*
September 27, 2019	April 4, 2020	Factoring Agreement	(16)		14,893	(16)	*
January 31, 2019	June 30, 2019	Promissory note	(2)		78,432	15%	*
January 24, 2019	January 24, 2021	Loan	(11)		140,535	11%	*
May 9, 2019	June 30, 2019	Promissory note	(6)		7,850	15%
May 31, 2019	June 30, 2019	Promissory note	(7)		86,567	15%
June 26, 2019	June 26, 2020	Promissory note	(12)		79,104	15%
September 24, 2019	June 24 2020	Promissory note	(17)		12,000	15%
January 30, 2020	January 30, 2021	Promissory note	(19)		11,000	15%
February 27, 2020	February 27, 2021	Promissory note	(20)		5,000	15%
				$	696,154
Less current portion of loans payable				$	696,154
Non-current portion of loans payable				$	—

__________


*	Note is in default. No notice has been given by the note holder.

(1)	Repayable in 12 monthly instalments of $2,376 commencing September 16 ,2018 and secured by revenue earning devices having a net book value of at least $25,000.Only $12,376 has been repaid by the Company and no notices have been received. Accrued interest of $1,511 has been recorded.

(2)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 33% original issue discount of $25,882.

(3)	Repayable in 12 monthly instalments of $4,562 commencing August 11 ,2018 and secured by revenue earning devices having a net book value of at least $48,000. No repayments have been made by the Company and no notices have been received.

(4)	Total loan $79,750 , repayable $475 per business day including fees and interest of $25,170. Original cash proceeds of $31,353 and $23,227 carried from previous loan less repayment of $38,000. The Company has pledged a security interest on all accounts receivable and bank accounts of the Company. Obligation under personal guaranty by the controlling shareholder of the Company.

(6)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 33% original issue discount of $2,590.

(7)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 33% original issue discount of $28,567.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(8)	Repayable in 10 monthly instalments of $848 commencing January 10 ,2019 and secured by revenue earning devices having a net book value of at least $186,000. Repaid in full.

(9)	Total loan $52,150 , repayable $869 per business day including fees and interest of $17,150. Original cash proceeds of $35,000. The loan has been fully repaid for $52,150.

(10)	$6,000 repaid during the year ended February 29,2020

(11)	$185,000 Canadian loan. Interest payable every calendar quarter commencing June30, 2019, if unpaid accrued interest to be paid at maturity. An additional interest amount calculated as 4% of RAD revenues from SCOT rentals for the fiscal years 2020 and 2021 shall be payable March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021 , respectively. Secured by a general security charging all of RAD’s present and after-acquired property in favor of the lender on a first priority basis subject to the following: the lender’s security in this respect shall be postponeable to security in favor of institutional financing obtained by RAD. Bonus interest of 10,304 has been accrued payable March 31, 2020.

(12)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 33% original issue discount of $26,104.

(13)	Total loan of $24,800 , repayable $2,480 per week including fees and interest of $4,800. Original proceeds of $20,000 less repayment of $19,840.The remaining balance of $4,960 has been transferred to new loan (14).The Company has pledged a security interest on all accounts receivable and bank accounts of the Company. Obligation under personal guaranty by the controlling shareholder of the Company.

(14)	Total loan of $243,639, repayable $1,509 per week including fees and interest of $60,042. Original cash proceeds of $7,877 , repayment of loans (5) and (13) totaling $15,732, partial repayment of fees of $5,566 all totaling $29,175, additional advances of $88,772 with remaining $65,551 to be advanced to the company over the remaining 18 weeks. The Company has repaid $77,869. The Company has pledged a security interest on all accounts receivable and bank accounts of the Company. Obligation under personal guaranty by the controlling shareholder of the Company.

(15)	Total loan of $71,000 , repayable $710 per business day including fees and interest of $21,000. Original proceeds of $50,000 less repayment of $41,758. The Company has pledged a security interest on all accounts receivable and bank accounts of the Company. Obligation under personal guaranty by the controlling shareholder of the Company.

(16)	Total loan of $59,960 , repayable $590 per business day including fees and interest of $19,960. Original proceeds of $40,000 less repayment of $45,067. The Company has pledged a security interest on all accounts receivable and bank accounts of the Company. Obligation under personal guaranty by the controlling shareholder of the Company.

(17)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 33% original issue discount of $3,000.

(18)	Total loan of $12,400 , repayable $1,240 per week including fees and interest of $2,400. Original cash proceeds of $10,000 , repayments of $4,920. The Company has pledged a security interest on all accounts receivable and bank accounts of the Company. Obligation under personal guaranty by the controlling shareholder of the Company.

(19)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 22% original issue discount of $2,450.

(20)	The note may be pre-payable at any time. The note balance includes 24% original issue discount of $1,200.

(21)	Principal repayable in one year. Interest repayable in 10 monthly instalments of $460 commencing January 11 ,2019 and secured by revenue earning devices having a net book value of at least $186,000. $25,000 repaid.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12. DERIVATIVE LIABILITES

As of February 29, 2020, and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019 the Company revalued the fair value of all of the Company’s derivative liabilities associated with the conversion features on the convertible notes payable and determined that it had a total derivative ~~liabilities~~liability of ~~$31,113,844.~~$6,890,688 and $6,170,139, respectively.

The Company estimated the fair value of the derivative liabilities using the ~~Monte-Carlo~~multinomial lattice model using the following key assumptions during the year ended February ~~28, 2018:~~29, 2020:


Strike price	$~~1.00~~1.40 - ~~$0.001~~$1.00
Fair value of Company common stock	$~~0.17~~86,500 - $0.0001
Dividend yield	0.00%
Expected volatility	~~85%~~590.10% - ~~65%~~396.40%
Risk free interest rate	~~1.01%~~1.05% - ~~1.57%~~2.63%
Expected term (years)	~~0.26~~0.04 - ~~4.00~~3.33

The Company estimated the fair value of the derivative liabilities using the multinomial lattice model using the following key assumptions during the year ended February 28, 2019:


Strike price	$10,000 - $10
Fair value of Company common stock	$3,375 - $110
Dividend yield	0.00%
Expected volatility	424% - 102%
Risk free interest rate	1.20% - 2.59%
Expected term (years)	0.00 - 3.66

During the ~~year~~years ended February 29, 2020, and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019 the Company released ~~$685,040~~$440,294 and $1,215,588, respectively, of the Company’s derivative liability to equity due to the conversions of principal and interest on the associated notes.

The changes in the derivative liabilities (Level 3 financial instruments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended February ~~28, 2018~~29, 2020 were as follows:

Addition of derivative liability pursuant to reverse recapitalization
$
9,035,437

Release of derivative liability on conversion of convertible notes payable recorded to equity

(685,040
)
Debt discount due to derivative liabilities

3,106,385

Derivative liability in excess of face value of debt recorded to interest expense

10,797,663

Reduction in derivative liability due to debt settlement

(635,922
)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

9,495,321

Balance as of February 28, 2018
$
31,113,844


Balance as of February 28, 2019	$	6,170,139

Release of derivative liability on conversion of convertible notes payable		(440,294	)
Debt discount due to derivative liabilities		26,250
Derivative liability in excess of face value upon issuance of debt recorded to interest expense		172,242
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt settlement		(164,768	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		1,127,119
Balance as of February 29, 2020	$	6,890,688

~~14. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)~~

~~Summary of Common Stock Activity~~

~~During~~The changes in the derivative liabilities (Level 3 financial instruments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended February 28, ~~2018 and prior to the Acquisition, OMVS issued the following shares of common stock:~~2019 were as follows:


●	~~Issued 76,008,764 shares of its common stock totaling $76,009 in connection with debt converted during the period;~~

●	~~Cancelled 600,000 shares of its common stock totaling $600; and~~

●	~~Issued 8,922,279 shares of its common stock totaling $8,922 in connections with warrants exercised during the period.~~

~~Following the Acquisition through February 28, 2018, the Company issued 23,016,667 shares of its common stock for the conversion of $123,000 of outstanding convertible debt.~~

~~On April 18, 2018, the board of directors approved a 100:1 reverse stock split on the issued and outstanding common shares. As of the filing date this change is not yet effective.~~


Balance as of February 28, 2018	$	31,113,844

Release of derivative liability on conversion of convertible notes payable		(1,215,588	)
Debt discount due to derivative liabilities		914,010
Derivative liability in excess of face value of debt recorded to interest expense		784,160
Increase in derivative liability due to debt settlement		612,752
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(26,039,039	)
Balance as of February 28, 2019	$	6,170,139

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Preferred Stock The Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. The board of directors is authorized to designate any series of preferred stock up to the total authorized number of shares.

Series E Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 4,350,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock. As of the date of this report, there are 4,350,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series E Preferred Stock ranks subordinate to the Company’s common stock as to distributions of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. The Series E preferred stock is non-redeemable, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company and does not receive dividends. The outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of equity instruments with voting rights. As a result, the holder of Series E Preferred Stock has 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders.

Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 4,350 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock with a par value of $1.00 per share. As of the date of this report, there are 4,350 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series F Convertible Preferred Stock is non-redeemable, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company, does not have voting rights and does not receive dividends. Each holder may, at any time and from time to time convert all, but not less than all, of their shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock determined by multiplying the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on the date of conversion by three and 45 100ths (3.45) on a pro rata basis. So long as any shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding, the Company shall not, without first obtaining the approval of the majority of the holders: (a) alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of any capital stock of the Company so as to affect adversely the Series F convertible preferred stock; (b) create any Senior Securities; (c) create any pari passu Securities; (d) do any act or thing not authorized or contemplated by the Certificate of Designation which would result in any taxation with respect to the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock under Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any comparable provision of the Internal Revenue Code as hereafter from time to time amended, (or otherwise suffer to exist any such taxation as a result thereof).

Summary of Preferred Stock Activity

During the year ended February 28 ~~2018, OMVS issued 1,000,000 and 1,000 shares~~2019, the Company received $174,070 for the sale of ~~its Series E and~~65 Series F preferred shares. As of the reporting date, these shares have not been issued and are included in preferred stock ~~respectively, totaling $1,000 and $1,000, respectively, in connection with~~to be issued on the ~~recapitalization of OMVS by RAD.~~balance sheet.

Summary of Common Stock ~~Option~~ Activity

~~As part~~On March 27, 2020 , the Company undertook a 10,000:1 reverse stock split and on August 24, 2018, the Company undertook a 100:1 reverse stock split. The share capital has been retrospectively adjusted accordingly to reflect this reverse stock split, except for the conversion price of certain convertible notes as the conversion price is not subject to adjustment from forward and reverse stock splits (see Note 13). Certain instruments issued prior to the reverse split that exercise into shares of our common stock are now shown in fractional units due to the effect of the ~~asset purchase agreement~~reverse split. If exercised, the Company is required to issue whole shares under its articles of incorporation.

On April 23, 2019 the Board of Directors approved an increase in authorized share capital to 5,000,000,000 shares of common stock and to change the par value of the common stock to $0.00001 per share. This became effective on June 20, 2019. The share capital has been retrospectively adjusted accordingly to reflect this change in par value.

The Company has 2,846 shares issuable due to partial shares as a result of the March 27,2020 reverse split that will be issued in April 2020.

During the year ended February 29, 2020, the Company issued 395,443 shares of its common stock for the conversion of debt and related interest and fees totaling $498,668 including $254,118 for of principal, $245,050 interest, $500 in fees in connection with debt converted during the period, as well as the release of the related derivative liability (see Note 13).

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the year ended February 28, 2019, the Company issued 19,901 shares of its common stock for the conversion of debt and related interest and fees totaling $851,687 including $803,905 for of principal, $35,782 interest, $12,000 in fees in connection with debt converted during the period, as well as the release of the related derivative liability (see Note 13).

During the year ended February 29, 2020 the company cancelled 0.45 warrants as a result of the settlement arrangement described in Note 7,14.


●	On April 16, 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 6.4 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its issuance of 6.4 shares of the Company’s common stock to an investor. The warrants have an exercise price of $20,000 per share and a three-year term.

●	On June 6, 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 0.7 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its issuance of 0.7 shares of the Company’s common stock to an investor. The warrants have an exercise price of $4,400 per share and a three-year term.

●	On August 24, 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 10.2 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its issuance of 10.2 shares of the Company’s common stock to an investor. The warrants have an exercise price of $1,500 per share and a three-year term.

●	In September and October 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 111.6 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its issuance of 111.6 shares of the Company’s common stock to an investor. The warrants have an exercise price ranging from $150-$350 per share and a three-year term

●	During the period December 1, 2018 to February 28, 2019 , the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,914 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its issuance of 1,914 shares of the Company’s common stock to an investor. The warrants have an exercise price ranging from $140-$310 per share and a three-year term

The above 2043 warrants issued along with the converted shares were recorded as an adjustment to paid in capital included with the value of the common shares converted.


	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Years
Outstanding at March 1, 2019	—	$ —	—
Issued	2,043	100	2.81
Exercised	—	—	—
Forfeited and cancelled	—	—	—
Outstanding at February 28, 2019	2,043	$ 100	2.81
Issued	—	—	—
Exercised	—	—	—
Forfeited and cancelled	0.45	5	—
Outstanding at February 29, 2020	2,043	$ 100	1.81

The Company also issued ~~450,000 options to purchase shares at~~0.25 warrants with an exercise price of ~~$0.05~~$30,000 per share ~~that vest~~and a 3-year term on ~~October 2, 2021.~~June 11, 2018, and 0.33 warrants with an exercise price of $150,000 and a three year term on March 14, 2018 in connection with loan payables (see Note 12).

The ~~options~~above warrants have aan aggregate grant date fair value of ~~$27,843,~~$12,967 based on the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model with the following assumptions:


Strike price	$~~0.05~~30,000 - $150,000
Fair value of Company’s common stock	$~~0.06~~13,000 - $61,000
Dividend yield	0.00%
Expected volatility	~~303.81%~~305.71% - 341.5%
Risk free interest rate	~~1.94%~~2.41% - 2.66%
Expected term (years)	~~4.00~~3.00

~~The Company will amortize~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the ~~$27,843 over the four-year term on a straight line basis as stock based compensation. During the year~~years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the ~~company~~Company recorded ~~$2,840~~a total of $0 and $12,967, respectively to stock-based compensation for options and warrants with a corresponding ~~increase in~~adjustment to additional paid-in capital. ~~At February 28, 2018, the unamortized expense was $25,003 and the intrinsic value was $0.~~

~~15.~~14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

Occasionally, the Company may be involved in claims and legal proceedings arising from the ordinary course of its business. The Company records a provision for a liability when it believes that is both probable that a liability has been incurred, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If these estimates and assumptions change or prove to be incorrect, it could have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. Contingencies are inherently unpredictable, and the assessments of the value can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions.

In April 2019 the principals of WeSecure (see Note 9) filed lawsuit in California Superior Court seeking damages for non-payment balance of sale of WeSecure assets totaling $25,000, unpaid consulting fees payable to the two principals through to September 2019 totaling $ $125,924.48, and labor code violations of $ $48,434.40 all totaling $199,358.88 plus attorney’s fees and damages. The parties finally settled all claims with a full release for $180,000 in June 2019 payable in 14 monthly instalments as follows:


2019			2020			Total
6/30/19	$	5,000	1/26/2020	$	15,000
7/30/19	$	5,000	2/25/2020	$	15,000
8/29/19	$	7,500	3/26/2020	$	15,000
9/28/19	$	7,500	4/25/2020	$	15,000
10/28/19	$	10,000	5/25/2020	$	20,000
11/27/19	$	10,000	6/25/2020	$	20,000
12/27/19	$	15,000	7/24/2020	$	20,000

Total	$	60,000		$	120,000	$	180,000

The company has fully accrued the above $180,000 as of February ~~2016, OMVS received notice that it had been sued~~28, 2019.

As of February 29, 2020 the Company has paid $17,500. As of this filing the September 2019 through July 2020 instalments are in ~~the Clark County District Court of Nevada.~~ arrears.

The plaintiff alleges that OMVS obtained certain trade secrets through a third party also named in the suit. OMVS believes the suit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend it. An arbitration was conducted on May 9, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Trial de Novo, seeking a review of the merit dismissal. It is counsel’s opinion this Trial de Novo is without merit and OMVS should prevail.related legal costs are expensed as incurred.

Operating Lease

The Company currently maintains an office at 1218-1222 Magnolia Ave, Suite 106 Bldg. H ,Corona, California 92881 pursuant to a month to month lease commencing March 1,2019. The Company’s ~~principal facility~~annual rent is located in Orange County, California. The lease agreement includes, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions. The lease began in April 2017 and expires in March 2022. Rent expense is recorded over the lease terms on a straight-line basis. The security deposit of $25,747 was recorded as a long-term asset as of August 31, 2017.$12,000 per year.

RAD maintains a mailing address for 31103 Ranch Viejo Road, Suite d2114 for a nominal fee of $ 264/yr. RAD previously had its offices at 23121 La Cadena Suite B/C Laguna Hills, California 92675, pursuant to a five-year term ending March 31, 2022. Its annual rental cost for this facility was approximately $65,000, plus a proportionate share of operating expenses of approximately $35,000 annually. The Company also ~~leases~~leased premises in northern California. The lease ~~began~~was for three years, beginning in August 2017, and ~~expires~~would expire in August 2020. The ~~security deposit of $5,126 was paid on September 1, 2017. The~~ Company ~~shares~~shared these premises with a former supplier who iswas the co-lessee. Through agreement with the supplier, the Company ~~will~~was to pay 75% of the lease costs and the supplier ~~will~~was to pay 25%.

The Company’s share of rent costs was approximately $43,000 annually. On February 1, 2018 the Company entered into an additional lease for premises for a robotic control center. The lease ~~runs~~ran from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2021 for ~~$550 per month.~~$6,600 annually. At the end of fiscal 2019 the Company terminated all three preceding leases through verbal arrangement with the landlord. Regarding the lease at La Cadena, the Company agreed to a settlement amount to cover unpaid rent , commissions and leasehold improvements paid by the landlord totaling $62,039 to be paid by the Company in 4 monthly instalments of $5,000 commencing August 1, 2019 with the remaining balance to be paid in $10,000 monthly instalments thereafter. The Company recorded the $62,039 as a loss on settlement. No further liability was recorded for both the northern California and robotic control center leases.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company’s leases are accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense is recorded over the lease terms on a straight-line basis. Rent expense was ~~$90,582~~$10,000 for the year ended February 29, 2020 and $134,940 for the year ended February 28, ~~2018 and $0~~2019.

At February 29, 2020 there were no Company’s future minimum payments.

Convertible Notes Payable

Certain convertible notes payable carry conditions whereby in the event of ant default of any condition the Company would be subject to certain financial penalties. Penalties earned through February 29, 2020 have been recorded in these financial statements (see Note 8).

15. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The net income (loss) per common share amounts were determined as follows:


	For the Years Ended
	February 29,			February 28,
	2020			2019
Numerator:
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(6,213,649	)	$	16,094,835

Effect of common stock equivalents
Add: interest expense on convertible debt		1,299,785			784,504
Add (less) loss (gain) on change of derivative liabilities		1,127,119			(26,039,039	)
Net income (loss) adjusted for common stock equivalents		(3,786,745	)		(9,159,700	)

Denominator:
Weighted average shares - basic		197,539			2,773

Net income (loss) per share – basic	$	(21.06	)	$	5,804.57

Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents:
Warrants		—			51
Convertible Debt		—			123,704
Preferred shares*		—			69,090

Denominator:
Weighted average shares – diluted		197,539			195,618

Net income (loss) per share – diluted	$	(31.46	)	$	(46.82	)

The anti-dilutive shares of common stock equivalents for ~~both~~ the ~~two months~~years ended February 28, ~~2017,~~2019 and ~~for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016.~~February 28, 2018 were as follows:


	For the Years Ended
	February 29, 2020		February 28, 2019
Stock options and warrants		7		7
Convertible debt		62,692,265,100		—
Preferred stock		1,443,532		—
Total		62,693,708,639		7

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~At February 28, 2018, the Company had deferred rent of $6,742 (February 28, 2017-$0).~~

~~At February 28, 2018, the Company’s future minimum payments are as follows:~~

February 28, 2019
$
98,855

February 28, 2020

99,980

February 28, 2021

75,355

February 28, 2022+

62,647

$
334,837

16. INCOME TAXES

~~Due~~The Company has adopted ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes”, which requires the use of the liability method in the computation of income tax expense and the current and deferred income taxes payable (deferred tax liability) or benefit (deferred tax asset). Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the ~~Company’s~~amount expected to be realized.

The income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019:


	February 29, 2020		February 28, 2019
Total current	$	—	$	—
Total deferred		—		—
	$	—	$	—

Deferred income taxes reflect the net ~~losses, there were no provisions~~tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income ~~taxes~~tax purposes.

The following is a reconciliation of the expected statutory federal income tax provision to the actual income tax benefit for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020 (in thousands):


	February 29, 2020
Federal statutory rate	$	(1,305,000	)
Non deductible interest		169,000
Non deductible changes in fair value of instruments		237,000
Other non deductible expenses		31,000
Change in valuation allowance		868,000
	$	—


	Year Ended February 28, 2019
U.S. federal statutory income tax	$	3,225,923
Amortization of debt discount		1,024,740
Fair value of derivative liabilities on issuance		215,295
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(5,527,483	)
Gain on debt settlement		(60,734	)
Stock-based compensation		133,284
Valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets		988,975
Effective income tax rate	$	—

For the year ended February 29, 2020, the expected tax benefit is calculated at the 2019 statutory rate of 21%. The effect for temporary timing differences are also calculated at the 25% statutory rate effective for fiscal year ended February 28, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~On December 22, 2017, new federal~~For the year ended February 29, 2020, the expected tax ~~reform legislation was enacted in~~benefit, temporary timing differences and long-term timing differences are calculated at the ~~United States (the “2017 Tax Act”), resulting in significant changes from previous tax law. The 2017 Tax Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to~~ 21% ~~from 34% effective January 1, 2018. The rate change, along with certain immaterial changes in tax basis resulting from the 2017 Tax Act, resulted in a reduction~~statutory rate.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets ~~of 202,948~~ and ~~a corresponding reduction~~liabilities were as follows for the fiscal years February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019:


	February 29, 2020			February 28, 2019
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	3,418,115		$	2,550,115
Total deferred tax assets		3,418,115			2,550,115

Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation		—			—
Deferred revenue		—			—
Total deferred tax liabilities		—			—

Net deferred tax assets:
Less valuation allowance		(3,418,115	)		(2,550,115	)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)	$	—		$	—

The Company has incurred losses since inception, therefore, the Company has no federal tax liability. Additionally there are limitations imposed by certain transactions which are deemed to be ownership changes which occurred in the ~~valuation allowance.~~Company on August 28, 2017. The ~~following table reconciles~~net deferred tax asset generated by the ~~U.S.~~loss carryforward has been fully reserved. The cumulative net operating loss carryforward was approximately $6,694,000 at February 29, 2020 and $2,550,000 at February 28, 2019, that is available for carryforward for federal ~~statutory~~ income tax ~~rate~~purposes and begin to expire in ~~effect for the year ended February 28, 2018, and the Company’s effective tax rate:~~2030.

Year Ended
February 28, 2018

U.S. federal statutory income tax

$
(7,938,439
)
Amortization of debt discount

3,534,829

Fair value of derivative liabilities on issuance

3,108,482

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

384,669

Gain on debt settlement

397,541

Stock-based compensation

930

Tax rate changes and other

202,948

Valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets

309,040

Effective income tax rate

$
—

Although the Company has tax loss carry-forwards, there is uncertainty as to utilization prior to their expiration. Accordingly, the future income tax asset amounts have been fully reserved by a valuation allowance.

~~Deferred income tax assets as of February 28, 2018 and 2016 are as follows (in thousands):~~

Deferred Tax Assets

February 28, 2018

Net operating loss carry forwards

$
1,561,140

Less valuation allowance

(1,561,140
)
Total deferred tax assets

$
—

~~In assessing the realization of~~The Company has maintained a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets ~~management considers whether~~at February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019. A valuation allowance is required to be recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of deferred assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

~~Based on the available objective evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that~~ the net deferred tax assets will not be ~~fully realizable. Accordingly, management has applied~~realized. Since the Company cannot be assured of realizing the net deferred tax asset, a full valuation allowance ~~against its net deferred~~has been provided.

The Company does not have any uncertain tax ~~assets~~positions at February 29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018.~~2019 that would affect its effective tax rate. The ~~net~~Company does not anticipate a significant change in the ~~total valuation allowance from~~amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months. Because the Company is in a loss carryforward position, the Company is generally subject to US federal and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for all years for which a loss carryforward is available. If and when applicable, the Company will recognize interest and penalties as part of income tax expense.

During the fiscal years ended February ~~28, 2017~~29, 2020 and February 28, ~~2018~~2019, the Company recognized no amounts related to tax interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state jurisdictions. The Company currently has no years under examination by any jurisdiction.

On August 28, 2017, the Company consummated a share exchange agreement whereby there was ~~an increase~~a change of ~~$1,561,140~~control and any net operating losses up to the date of the transaction were forfeited.

The Company’s ~~policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized~~ tax ~~benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of~~returns for the years ended February 29, 2020,and February 28, 2019, and 2018 the Company did not have any significant uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits. The Company did not have associated accrued interest or penalties, nor was any interest expense or penalties recognizedare open for ~~the year ended February 28, 2018.~~examination under Federal statute of limitations.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES,~~ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of February 28, 2018, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3,914,000 (not subject to limitations) and $3,520,000 (subject to limitations), which if not utilized, will expire beginning in 2038 and 2030, respectively.

Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), as amended, as well as similar state provisions. In general, an “ownership change” as defined by the Code results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50 percent of the outstanding stock of a company by certain shareholders or public groups.

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 14, 2018, the Company amended a note issued to a lender on January 5, 2018 to include the issuance of warrants to purchase 333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.15, with a 3-year maturity, and to change the date of the note to March 14, 2018, coinciding with the payment of the first tranche of $50,000 including cash proceeds of $43,000, fees of $2,000 and an original issue discount of $5,000. The original note issued on January 5, 2018 was issued with an aggregate principal amount of $250,000, for cash proceeds of $225,000 payable in tranches, with an original issue discount of $25,000. Each tranche matures one year after disbursement. The promissory note is convertible into common shares of the Company and a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock for the last 25 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 10% per annum interest rate commencing on March 14, 2018.

On March 16, 2018, the Company issued a convertible redeemable note to a lender with an aggregate principal amount of $95,000, due on March 16, 2019 for cash proceeds of $95,000. The promissory note is convertible into units of the Company comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock with a three-year maturity and a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 15% per annum interest rate commencing on March 16, 2018.

On April 9, 2018, the Company issued a convertible redeemable note to a lender with an aggregate principal amount of $55,000, due on April 9, 2019 for cash proceeds of $55,000. The promissory note is convertible into units of the Company comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock with a three-year maturity and a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 40 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 15% per annum interest rate commencing on April 9, 2018.

~~In March and April 2018, the Company received $200,000 in proceeds from the June 7, 2018 collateralized promissory note for $200,000 from a lender maturing June 7, 2018, bearing interest at 8%.~~

On April 23, 2018, the Company received $76,000 of proceeds from a lender on the two March 21, 2018 collateralized promissory notes of $40,000, each including fess of $4,000, bearing interest at 8% and maturing on March 21, 2018.

On May 3, 2018, the Company received $66,500 of proceeds from a lender on a $70,000 promissory note that matured on May 31, 2018. The note has an original issue discount of $3,500 and bears interest at 15% per annum. The loan was repaid in May 2018.

On May 2, 2018, the Company issued a convertible redeemable note to a lender with an aggregate principal amount of $77,000, due on May 2, 2019 for cash proceeds of $70,000. The promissory note is convertible into one share of common stock and a conversion price equal to 40% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 10% per annum interest rate commencing on May 2, 2018.

~~ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.~~

~~(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)~~

~~NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

On May 4, 2018, the Company issued a convertible redeemable note to a lender with an aggregate principal amount of $82,500, due on May 4, 2019 for cash proceeds of $71,500. The principal amount includes an original issue discount of $7,500 and fees of $3,500. The promissory note is convertible into one share of common stock and a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to conversion, and has a 12% per annum interest rate commencing on May 2, 2018.

Subsequent to ~~year-end,~~February 29, 2020 through to July 21 ,2020, convertible note holders converted ~~$317,433 in~~638,815 of principal, $340,078 interest and ~~$1,500~~$16,000 in fees ~~for 29,256,243~~into 195,130,928 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On April ~~16, 2018,~~22, 2020 the Company ~~issued warrants~~entered into a similar agreement as that described in Note 8 with the second investor (therein described) whereby the investor would pay up to $100,000 in exchange for a ~~fair value~~perpetual 1% royalty on the Company’s reported quarterly revenue. These royalty payments are to be made 90 days after the fiscal quarter with the first payment being due no later than July 1, 2020. If the royalty payments would deplete RAD’s available cash by more than 2.22%, the payment may be deferred. The investor has fully funded the $100,000 in April 2020.

On April 3, 2020 the Company entered into a loan agreement for cash proceeds of ~~$472,960~~$27,697 ($40,000 CDN). The loan bears interest at 20% per annum, with interest payments commencing on the third month following the loan and then paid over the following 10 months. The loan matures on April 3, 2021. Should the loan and interest be unpaid at maturity a 10% (annual rate) penalty would apply on the unpaid balance for each day unpaid. By consent of all parties, the lender may convert balance into Class F shares at $6,739 USD per share at maturity.

On April 16, 2020 the Company entered into a loan agreement for $13,000 with cash proceeds of $9,150 and an original issue discount of $3,850. The loan bears interest at 15% per annum, and matures on April 16, 2021.

On May 12, 2020 the Company entered into a loan agreement for $43,500 with cash proceeds of $35,500 and an original issue discount of $8,000. The loan bears interest at 15% per annum, and matures on May 12, 2021.

On May 22, 2020 the Company entered into a loan agreement for $85,000 with cash proceeds of $70,000 and an original issue discount of $15,000. The loan bears interest at 15% per annum, and matures on May 22, 2021.

On July 1, 2020 the Company entered into a similar agreement as that described in Note 8 with the first investor (therein described) whereby the investor would pay up to ~~purchase 6,400,000 shares~~$800,000 in exchange for a perpetual 2.75% royalty on the Company’s reported quarterly revenue. These royalty payments are to be made 90 days after the fiscal quarter with the first payment being due no later than May 31, 2021. If the royalty payments would deplete RAD’s available cash by more than 20%, the payment may be deferred. The investor has agreed to pay 100,000 per month over an 8 month period with the first payment in July 2020 and the final payment no later than February 28, 2021. If the total investment turns out to be less than $800,000, this would not constitute a breach of the ~~Company’s common stock with~~agreement, rather the royalty rate would be adjusted on a ~~three year maturity and an exercise price of $0.0265 per share.~~pro-rata basis.

~~F-22~~On July 22, 2020 the board of directors passed a resolution whereby the sole director will return to the Company for cancellation 816 of his 1000 Series F preferred shares.

F-31


	Period									Period						Change
	Year Ended February 28, 2018			Two Months Ended February 28, 2017			Period from Inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016			Year Ended February 29, 2020			Year Ended February 28, 2019			Dollars			Percentage

Revenues	$	106,476		$	—		$	—		$	260,768		$	114,671		$	146,097		127%

Gross profit		61,476			—			—			177,008			110,149			66,859		61%

Operating expenses		3,578,301			81,203			79,921			1,959,814			3,524,545			(1,564,731	)	(44%)

Loss from operations		(3,516,825	)		(81,203	)		(79,921	)		(1,782,806	)		(3,414,396	)		1,631,590		(48%)

Other income (expense), net		(20,732,176	)		(2,732	)		(1,183	)		(4,430,843	)		19,509,231			(23,940,074	)	(123%)

Net loss	$	(24,249,001	)	$	(83,935	)	$	(81,104	)
Net Income (loss)										$	(6,213,649	)	$	16,094,835		$	(22,308,484	)	(139%)


	Period						Period					Change
	Year Ended February 28, 2018		Two Months Ended February 28, 2017		Period from Inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016		Year Ended February 29, 2020			Year Ended February 28, 2019		Dollars			Percentage

Research and development	$	493,000	$	20,153	$	30,572	$	332,520		$	540,971	$	(208,451	)	(39%)

General and administrative		2,391,664		54,856		49,349		1,536,568			2,795,790		(1,259,222	)	(45%)

Depreciation and amortization		130,081		6,194		—		102,241			114,612		(12,371	)	(11%)

Loss on impairment of fixed assets		563,556		—		—		(11,515	)		73,172		(84,687	)	(116%)

Operating expenses	$	3,578,301	$	81,203	$	79,921	$	$1,959,814		$	3,524,545	$	(1,564,731	)	(44%)


	-	Professional fees decreased by $178,102 due to higher reporting costing 2019 as a result of multiple auditor changes and amendments.

	-	Wages, salaries and payroll levies decreased by $861,472 as a result of eliminating employees and shifting work to subcontractors.

	-	Rent decreased by $124,940 as a result of terminating three leases in 2019.

	-	Trade shows and travel decreased by $153,657 as a result of larger marketing push in 2019 on the release of the new products.

	-	In general , due to limited resources the Company had to reduce expenditures in all areas of the business. These reductions as well as those mentioned above were partially offset by increase in subcontractor fees of $343,080 that were a result replacing the employees as mentioned above.


	February 28, 2018			February 28, 2017		Change			February 29, 2020			February 28, 2019

Current assets	$	491,989		$	214,685	$	277,304		$	88,213		$	366,681
Current liabilities(1)		34,784,191			103,149		34,681,042			19,677,221			15,743,601
Working capital (deficit)	$	(34,292,202	)	$	111,536	$	(34,403,738	)
Working capital									$	(19,589,008	)	$	(15,376,920	)


	Year Ended February 28, 2018			Two Months Ended February 28, 2017			Period from Inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016

Net cash used in operating activities	$	(3,309,230	)	$	(225,153	)	$	(58,749	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(239,490	)	$	(85,050	)	$	—
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	3,516,586		$	317,514		$	108,345


	High		Low
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2018:
Quarter ended February 28, 2018	$	0.12	$	0.05
Quarter ended November 30, 2017	$	0.14	$	0.04
Quarter ended August 31, 2017	$	0.27	$	0.03
Quarter ended May 31, 2017	$	0.08	$	0.02

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2017:
Quarter ended February 28, 2017	$	0.02	$	0.00
Quarter ended November 30, 2016	$	0.10	$	0.01
Quarter ended August 31, 2016	$	0.20	$	0.07
Quarter ended May 31, 2016	$	0.50	$	0.14


●	Research and development expenses decreased by $208,451 which resulted from a decrease in R&D Consultation fees from RAD Canada of $388,289 because of higher initial development costs in 2019 on the new products Scott, Wally and Rosa. This decrease is partially offset by other fees due to the elimination of employees in 2020 whose work is being now carried out by subcontractors.

●	General and administrative expenses – ~~$2,336,808~~
●	~~Research and development~~ – ~~$472,847~~
●	~~Depreciation and amortization~~ –~~$123,887~~
●	~~Loss on impairment of fixed assets~~ – ~~$563,556~~decreased by $1,259,222 primarily due to the following decreases:


●	~~General~~Depreciation and ~~administrative expenses~~ – ~~$2,342,315~~amortization decreased by $12,371 due to lower fixed assets.

●	~~Research and development~~ – ~~$462,428~~
●	~~Depreciation and amortization~~ –~~$130,081~~
●	~~Loss~~Gain loss on ~~impairment~~disposal /impairment of fixed assets – ~~$563,556~~increased by $84,687 sue to 2019 write downs and disposals in 2020 that generated small gains.


●	Change in fair value of derivative liabilities decreased by $27,166,158 due to the re-valuation of derivative liability on convertible notes based on the change in the market price of the Company’s common stock.

●	Interest expense decreased by $3,281,927 due to a decrease in interest expense related to the derivative liability in excess of debt and the amortization of discounts , partially offset by an increase in interest expense on debt.

●	Gain on settlement of debt decreased by $55,843 due to a decrease in the number and amount of debt settlements this year over last year.


(1)	As February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019, current liabilities included approximately $6.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of derivative liabilities that are expected to be settled in shares of the Company in accordance with the various conversion terms.


~~(1)~~	The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was computed by multiplying the number of common shares of OMVS outstanding as of February 28, 2017 by 3.45 based on the terms listed under the amended Certificate of Designation for OMVS’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock.


	Series E			Series F						Additional					Total
	Preferred Stock			Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Paid-In		Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit			Deficit

Balance at February 28, 2018	4,350,000	$	4,350	3,450	$	3,450	125	$	—	$	1,233,312	$	(35,504,029	)	$	(34,262,917	)
Preferred stock payable						174,070										174,070
Adjustment to derivative liability	—		—	—		—	—		—		1,215,588		—			1,215,588
Common stock issued for debt conversion	—		—	—		—	19,901		—		851,687		—			851,687
Common Stock adjustment for reverse split	—		—	—		—	—		—		82,052		—			82,052
Stock based compensation	—		—	—		—	—		—		12,967		—			12,967
Net income (loss)	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		16,094,835			16,094,835
Balance at February 28, 2019	4,350,000	$	4,350	3,450	$	177,520	20,026	$	—	$	3,395,606	$	(19,409,194	)	$	(15,831,718	)
Adjustment to derivative liability	—		—	—		—	—		—		440,294		—			440,294
Common stock issued for debt conversion	—		—	—		—	395,443		4		498,664		—			498,668
Common stock adjustment issuable on reverse split	—		—	—		—	2,946		—		—		—			—
Net income (loss)	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(6,213,649	)		(6,213,649	)
Balance at February 29, 2020	4,350,000	$	4,350	3,450	$	177,520	418,415	$	4	$	4,334,564	$	(25,622,843	)	$	(21,106,405	)


	Year Ended February 29, 2020			Year Ended February 28, 2019
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(6,213,649	)	$	16,094,835
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		102,241			114,612
Provision for note receivable		—			—
Provision for note receivable		—			40,000
Loss (gain) on (disposal) impairment of fixed assets		(11,515	)		73,172
Stock based compensation		—			12,967
Provision for inventory		54,702			—
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		1,127,119			(26,039,039	)
Interest expense related to penalties from debt defaults		314,347			352,493
Interest expense related to derivative liability in excess of face value of debt		198,492			1,017,250
Amortization of debt discounts		874,187			4,641,181
(Gain) loss on settlement of debt		(159,370	)		(217,217	)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(10,153	)		(11,964	)
Prepaid expenses		18,778			64,325
Device parts inventory		(6,875	)		42,617
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		157,165			1,219,703
Balance owed WeSecure		(17,500	)		—
Customer discounts		—			—
Current portion of deferred variable payment obligation		30,534			—
Accrued interest payable		1,795,514			790,804
Advances payable		(11,040	)		—
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,757,023	)		(1,804,261	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of fixed assets		(26,825	)		(232,858	)
Proceeds of disposal of fixed assets		9,500			—
Cash paid for security deposit		—			30,141
Net cash used in investing activities		(17,325	)		(202,717	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from convertible notes payable, net		25,000			1,227,608
Principal repayments on convertible notes payable		—			(187,000	)
Proceeds from deferred variable payment obligation		1,366,500			192,500
Proceeds from loans payable		768,563			539,575
Repayment of loans payable		(534,890	)		(156,500	)
Net borrowings on loan payable - related party		141,290			218,890
Repayment of vehicle loan		—			(5,746	)
Proceeds from sale of preferred shares		—			174,070
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,766,463			2,003,397

Net change in cash		(7,885	)		(3,581	)

Cash, beginning of period		21,192			24,773

Cash, end of period	$	13,307		$	21,192

Supplemental disclosure of cash and non-cash transactions:
Cash paid for interest	$	40,815		$	3,213
Cash paid for income taxes	$	—		$	—

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Inventory converted to revenue earning devices	$	106,256		$	—
Transfer from accounts payable to loan payable related party	$	—		$	247,812
Debt discount from derivative liabilities	$	—		$	914,010
Conversion of convertible notes and interest to shares of common stock	$	498,664		$	851,687
Release of derivative liability on conversion of convertible notes payable	$	440,294		$	1,215,588
Settlement and exchange of convertible notes payable	$	—		$	670,286
Reclassification of fixed assets to vehicle for disposal	$	—		$	13,251
Proceeds of disposal offset against vehicle loan	$	13,251		$	21,907
Capitalization of accrued interest to convertible notes payable and loans payable	$	160,282		$	67,272


	Series E			Series FConvertible						Additional					Total
	Preferred Stock			Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Paid-In		Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance at Inception July 26, 2016	3,350,000	$	3,350	2,450	$	2,450	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	19,657
Net loss	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(100,762	)		(100,762	)
Balance at December 31, 2016	3,350,000	$	3,350	2,450	$	2,450	—	$	—	$	13,857	$	(100,762	)	$	(81,105	)
Net loss	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(83,935	)		(83,935	)
Balance at February 28, 2017	3,350,000	$	3,350	2,450	$	2,450	—	$	—	$	13,857	$	(184,697	)	$	(165,040	)
Common stock and preferred stock issued for recapitalization by RAD	1,000,000		1,000	1,000		1,000	101,987,887		101,987		306,588		(11,070,331	)		(10,659,756	)
Common stock issued for debt conversion	—		—	—		—	23,016,667		23,017		785,023		—			808,040
Stock based compensation	—		—	—		—	—		—		2,840		—			2,840
Net loss	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(24,249,001	)		(24,249,001	)
Balance at February 28, 2018	4,350,000	$	4,350	3,450	$	3,450	125,004,554	$	125,004	$	1,108,308	$	(35,504,029	)	$	(34,262,917	)


	February 28, 2018		February 28, 2017
Deposits on robots	$	—	$	150,000
Prepaid insurance		22,076		—
Prepaid travel		10,488		—
Prepaid trade show expenses		50,539		—
	$	83,103	$	—


	February 28, 2018			February 28, 2017
Intangible asset	$	61,901		$	—
Less accumulated amortization		(5,653	)		—
	$	56,248		$	—


Assets Acquired:
Cash	$	17,000
Robots, parts, and equipment		46,099
Intangible assets		61,901
Total assets acquired	$	125,000

Liabilities Assumed:
Acquisition cost	$	125,000
Total liabilities assumed	$	125,000


Conversion Date	Principal Converted		Interest Converted		Total Amount Converted		Shares Converted
September 5, 2017	$	26,250	$	—	$	26,250		5,250,000
September 18, 2017		27,250		—		27,250		5,450,000
September 27, 2017		29,000		—		29,000		5,800,000
October 16, 2017		30,500		—		30,500		6,100,000
October 16, 2017		10,000		—		10,000		416,667
	$	123,000	$	—	$	123,000		23,016,667


Addition of derivative liability pursuant to reverse recapitalization	$	9,035,437
Release of derivative liability on conversion of convertible notes payable recorded to equity		(685,040	)
Debt discount due to derivative liabilities		3,106,385
Derivative liability in excess of face value of debt recorded to interest expense		10,797,663
Reduction in derivative liability due to debt settlement		(635,922	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		9,495,321
Balance as of February 28, 2018	$	31,113,844


February 28, 2019	$	98,855
February 28, 2020		99,980
February 28, 2021		75,355
February 28, 2022+		62,647
	$	334,837


	Year Ended February 28, 2018
U.S. federal statutory income tax	$	(7,938,439	)
Amortization of debt discount		3,534,829
Fair value of derivative liabilities on issuance		3,108,482
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		384,669
Gain on debt settlement		397,541
Stock-based compensation		930
Tax rate changes and other		202,948
Valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets		309,040
Effective income tax rate	$	—


Deferred Tax Assets	February 28, 2018
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	1,561,140
Less valuation allowance		(1,561,140	)
Total deferred tax assets	$	—