Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports)suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [√[✓] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (ormonths(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [√[✓] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] |
| Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company |
| Emerging growth company [ ] |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [ ] No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on September 27, 201323, 2016 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $52$68.8 million. The market value calculation was determined using the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on September 27, 2013,23, 2016, as reported on theThe NASDAQ Global Market.
The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of June 23, 201414, 2017 was 6,779,708.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 9, 201413, 2017 have been incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this report.
| Page | |||||
| Part I | |||||
| Part II | |||||
| Part III | |||||
| Part IV | |||||
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular,contains “forward-looking statements” within the Management’s Discussion and Analysismeaning of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These includeForward-looking statements concerningrelate to expectations, estimates, beliefs, assumptions and projections about the industry, management beliefspredictions of future events and assumptions of Transcat, Inc. (“Transcat”, “we”, “us”, or “our”). Wordsare identified by words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”,“anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “intends,” “could,” “may,” and variationsother similar words. Forward-looking statements are not statements of such wordshistorical fact and similar expressionsthus are intendedsubject to identifyrisks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those expressed in such forward-looking statements. You should evaluate forward-looking statements in light of important risk factors and uncertainties that may affect our operating and financial results and our ability to achieve our financial objectives. These statementsfactors include, but are not guaranteeslimited to, our reliance on one vendor to supply a significant amount of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to forecast, including, among other things,inventory purchases, the risks related to current and future indebtedness, the relatively low trading volume of our common stock, risks related to our acquisition strategy and the integration of the businesses we acquire, the impact of economic conditions, volatility in the oil and gas industry, the highly competitive nature of our two business segments, foreign currency rate fluctuations and cybersecurity risks. These risk factors and uncertainties identifiedare more fully described by us below under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item IAIA. of Part I of this report. Therefore,You should not place undue reliance on our actual results and outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecast in any such forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update, correct or publicly updateannounce any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Transcat, Inc. (“Transcat”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) is a leading provider of accredited calibration and compliancelaboratory instrument services and a value-added distributor of professional grade handheld test, measurement and control instrumentation. We are primarily focused on providing our services and products to highly regulated industries, particularly the following industries:
We conduct our business through two operating segments: service (“Service”) and distribution (“Distribution”). See Note 7 ofto our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for financial information for these segments. We concentrate on attracting new customers in each segment, retaining existing customers in each segment and on cross-selling to existing customers to increase our total revenue. We serve approximately 17,00020,000 and 23,00022,000 customers through our Service and Distribution segments, respectively, with over 25%approximately 30% of those customers transacting with us through both of our business segments.
Through our Service segment, we offer calibration, compliancerepair, inspection, analytical qualifications, preventative maintenance, consulting and other complimentaryrelated services, a majority of which are processed through our proprietary asset management system,CalTrak® (“CalTrak®”). Our Service model is flexible, and we cater to our customers’ needs by offering a variety of services and solutions including permanent and periodic on-site services, mobile calibration services, pickup and delivery and in-house services. As of our fiscal year ended March 29, 201425, 2017 (“fiscal year 2014”2017”), we operated eighteentwenty-two calibration service centers (“Calibration Centers of Excellence”Service Centers”) strategically located across the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. We also serve our customers on-site at their facility for daily, weekly or longer-term periods. In addition, we have several permanent customer-site locations where we provide calibration services, and in some cases other related services, exclusively for the customer where we reside and work every day. We also have a fleet of mobile calibration trailers that can provide service at customer sites which may not have the space or utility capabilities we require to service their equipment.
All of our Calibration Service Centers of Excellence have obtained ISO/IEC 17025 scopes of accreditation which are believed to be among the best in the industry.accreditation. Our accreditations are the cornerstone of our quality program, which we believe to be unequaledis among the best in the industry. Our dedication to quality is highly valued by businesses that operate in the industries we serve, particularly those in life science and other FDA-regulated industries, and our accreditations provide our customers with confidence that they will receive a consistent and uniform service, regardless of which of our eighteen Calibration Centers of Excellenceservice centers completes the service.
Through our Distribution segment, we marketsell and sellrent national and proprietary brand instruments to customers globally. Our product catalog (“Master Catalog”)Through our website, in-house sales team and websiteprinted and digital marketing materials, we offer access to more than 100,000 test, measurement and control instruments, including products from approximately 120 of the industry’s540 leading manufacturers including Fluke, Megger, GE, Emerson, Agilent, FLIR and Rosemount. In addition, we are the exclusive worldwide distributor for Transmation and Altek products. The majority of themanufacturers. Most instruments we sell and rent require expert calibration service to ensure that they maintain the most precise measurements.
Our commitment to quality goes beyond the services and products we deliver. Our sales, customer service and support teams stand ready to provide expert advice, application assistance and technical support wherever and wheneverto our customers need it.customers. Since calibration is an intangible service, our customers rely on us to uphold high standards and trustprovide integrity in the integrity of our people and processes.
Our customers are many Fortune 500/Global 500 companies. Transcat has focused on serving the pharmaceutical and other FDA-regulated industries, industrial manufacturing, energy and utility, chemical manufacturing and other industries since our founding in 1964. We are ainclude leading supplier of test, measurement and control instrumentationmanufacturers in the markets we serve.life science/pharmaceutical, energy, defense, aerospace and industrial process control sectors. We believe our customers do business with us because of our integrity and commitment to quality service, our broad range of product and service offerings and our asset management system, CalTrak®. In our fiscal years 2012year ended March 28, 2015 (“fiscal year 2015”) through 2014,fiscal year 2017, no customer or controlled group of customers accounted for 10%5% or more of our total revenue. The loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or results of operations.
Transcat was incorporated in Ohio in 1964. We are headquartered in Rochester, New York and employ more than 400 people.550 people, including approximately 150 in our corporate headquarters. Our executive offices are located at 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is 585-352-7777.
OUR STRATEGY
Our objectivetwo operating segments are highly complementary in that their offerings are of value to customers within the same industries. Our strategy is to continueleverage the complementary nature of our operating segments in ways that add value for all customers who select Transcat as their source for test and measurement equipment and/or calibration and laboratory instrument services. We strive to growdifferentiate ourselves within the markets we serve and build barriers to competitive entry by offering a broad range of products and services and by integrating our Serviceproduct and Distribution segments through organic revenue growthservice offerings in a value-added manner to benefit our customers’ operations.
During fiscal year 2017, we made an important, strategic decision to commit capital and acquisitions.
Within the Service segment, our strategy is to focus primarilydrive double-digit revenue growth both through organic expansion and acquisitions. We have adopted an integrated sales model to drive sales across the enterprise and capitalize on the cross-selling opportunities between our two segments, especially leveraging our Distribution relationships to develop new Service relationships. We leverage these relationships with our unique value proposition which resonates strongly with customers thatwho rely on accredited calibration services and/or compliancelaboratory instrument services and value superior quality to maintain the integrity of their processes and/or meet the demands of regulated business environments. We focus on customers that requireOur focused customer base values our superior quality programs and requires precise measurement capability forin their manufacturing and testing processes to minimize risk, waste and defects. We execute this strategy by leveraging our quality programs, metrology expertise, multiple locations, highly qualified technicians, and breadth of capabilities, and on-site and depot service options. All of which allows us to meet the most rigorous quality demands of our most highly regulated customers while simultaneously being nimble enough to meet their business needs.
We expect to continue to grow our Service business organically by taking market share from other third party providers and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), as well as targeting the outsourcing of in-house calibration labs. We believe an important element in taking market share is our ability to expand into new technical capabilities that are in demand by our current and target customer base.
The other component to our Service growth strategy is acquisitions. There are three drivers of our acquisition strategy: infrastructure leverage, geographic expansion and increased capabilities.
Our Distribution segment strategy is to be the premier distributor of leading handheld test and measurement equipment. Through our vendor relationships we have access to more than 100,000 products, which we market to our existing and prospective customers both with and without value-added service options that are unique to Transcat. In addition to offering pre-shipment value-added services, we offer our customers the options of renting selected test and measurement equipment or buying used equipment, furthering our ability to answer all of our customers’ test and measurement equipment needs. We continuously evaluate our offerings and add new in-demand vendors and products. In recent years we have expanded the number of SKU’s that we stock and the number of SKU’s that are sold with pre-shipment calibrations and have increased our focus on digital marketing to capitalize on the growing B2B ecommerce trend.
We see these various methods of meeting our Distribution customers’ needs as a way to differentiate ourselves and to diversify this segment’s customer base from its historically more narrow scope. This differentiation and diversification strategy has been deliberately instituted in recent years as a means to mitigate the effect of price-driven competition and to lessen the impact that any particular industry or market will have on the overall performance of this segment.
As part of our growth strategy, we have engaged incompleted a number of business acquisitions. Duringacquisitions during our fiscal yearsyear ended March 30, 201326, 2016 (“fiscal year 2013”2016”) and March 31, 2012 (“fiscal year 2012”), we completed the following acquisitions:
On |
| ● | Effective August 24, 2015, we acquired Anmar Metrology, Inc. (“Anmar”), a calibration |
On |
Effective December 31, 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of | |
| ● | Effective January 18, 2016, we acquired Dispersion Laboratory Inc. ("Dispersion"), headquartered near Montreal, Quebec. Dispersion provides fully accredited services for the calibration, repair and product sales of weights, balances, temperature instruments and liquid handling devices, primarily to the Canadian life science industry. |
| ● | On April 1, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Excalibur Engineering, Inc. (“Excalibur”). Headquartered in Irvine, California, Excalibur is a |
Our acquisition strategy primarily targets service businesses that expand our geographic reach and leverage our infrastructure while also increasing the depth and/or breadth of our service capabilities. Becausecapabilities and expertise. The table below illustrates the strategical drivers for each of the acquisitions executed during our acquisition strategy is focused on service businesses,fiscal year 2016 and we expect the growth ratefiscal year 2017:
| Geographic | Increased | Leveraged | |
| Expansion | Capabilities | Infrastructure | |
| Calibration | ✓ | ||
| Technologies | |||
| Anmar | ✓ | ||
| Nordcal | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Spectrum | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Dispersion | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Excalibur | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Table of our Service segment will exceed that of our Distribution segment over the long term.
We believe our combined DistributionService and ServiceDistribution segment offerings, experience, technical expertise and integrity create a unique and compelling value proposition for our customers.customers, and we intend to continue to grow our business through organic revenue growth and business acquisitions. We striveconsider the attributes of our Service segment which include higher gross margins and a recurring revenue streams to differentiate ourselvesbe more compelling and build barriersscalable than our legacy Distribution segment. For this reason, we expect our Service segment to competitive entry by offering a broad rangebe the primary source of revenue and earnings growth in future fiscal years. The charts below illustrate Service, Distribution and consolidated revenue over the best products and services, and integrating those products and services to benefit our customers’ operations and lower their costs.
| Service Revenue Trend (in millions) | Distribution Revenue Trend (in millions) | |
 |  | |
Consolidated Revenue (in millions) | ||
| ||
SEGMENTS
Service Segment
Calibration.Calibration is the act of comparing a unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of known value and reporting the result in some specifically defined form. After the calibration has been completed, a decision is made, based on rigorously defined parameters, regarding what, if anything, should be done to the unit to conform to the required standards or specifications. The decision may be to adjust, optimize or repair a unit; limit the use, range or rating of a unit; scrap the unit; or leave the unit as is. The purpose of calibration is to significantly reduce the risk of product or process failures caused by inaccurate measurements. CalibrationIn addition to being an element of risk management, calibration improves an operation’s productivity and efficiency to optimal levels by assuring accurate, reliable instruments and processes.
The need for calibration is often driven by regulation, and we specifically target industries and companies that are regulated by the FDA, FAA or other regulatory bodies and, as a result, require quality calibration and laboratory instrument services as a critical component of their business operations. As a result of the various levels of regulation within our target industries, our customers’ calibration and laboratory instrument service sourcing decisions are generally made based on the provider’s quality systems, accreditation, reliability, trust, customer service and documentation of services. To maintain our competitive position in this segment, we maintain internationally recognized third-party accredited quality systems, further detailed in the section entitled “Quality” below, and provide our customers with access to proprietary asset management software solutions, which offer tools to manage their internal calibration programs and provide them with visibility to their service records.
Through our Service segment, we perform recurring periodic calibrations (typically ranging from three monththree-month to twenty-four month intervals) on new and used instruments as well as repair services for our customers.
Laboratory Instrument Services.Compliance.Our compliancelaboratory instrument services (“LIS”) include analytical qualification, validation, remediation and remediationpreventative maintenance services. AnalyticalOur analytical qualification and validation services provide a comprehensive and highly specialized service offering focused on life science-related industries. Analytical qualifications and validation services include validations to specifically documented protocols that are commonly used in highly-regulated life science industries including installation qualification (“IQ”), operational qualification (“OQ”), and performance qualification (“PQ”). Most of the demand for our qualification, validation and preventative maintenance services comes from companies and institutions engaged in pharmaceutical manufacturing and other FDA-regulated industries. research and development.
Our goal is to deliver specialized technical services with a quality assurance approach, which maximizes document accuracy and on-time job delivery. These industries demand knowledgeable contract services, and Transcat meets these demands with GMP, GLPcurrent good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) and GxPgood laboratory practice (“GLP”) compliant services. Companies within these innovative and cutting-edge life science industries need a reliable alternative to the original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”)OEMs and the “generalist” service providers who cannot meet their industry-specific needs. Remediation services are focused on assistingWe believe our customers with efforts to get back into compliance with regulations after the FDA or other government authority has taken action with respectvalue proposition to the customer’s operations.
Analytical qualifications and preventative maintenance services are typically based on service agreements for testing, preventative maintenance and repairperiodic service, and tend to generate recurring revenue. ValidationSome validation services are based on certain customer processes. While specificsome validation services may not be repeated, we generally develop relationships with these customers who may engage usthat lead to demand for multipleadditional unique validation services. Remediation services are based on specific regulatory actions and are generally project-based and required by a customer for a finite period of time. ThisRemediation revenue is not recurring by its nature.
Other Services.We provide other services to our customers such as inspection, repair inspection and consulting services.services, which appeal to customers across all sectors in our customer base. These are generally value-added services and allow us to provide “one-stop shopping” for our customers.
Service revenue while approximately 15% of our Service revenue was derived from services that were subcontracted to third party vendors, and the remaining 2% was associated with other billings.Value Proposition. Our Service segment accounted for 41% of our total revenue in fiscal year 2014.
| 1) | ||||
● | permanent on-site |
● |
● | in-house services: services are performed at one of our twenty-two Calibration Service Centers (often accompanied by pick-up and delivery services); and | ||
● | mobile calibration services: services are completed on a customer’s property within our mobile calibration unit. | ||
| 2) | For companies that maintain an | ||
● | calibration of primary standards; and |
● | overflow capability, either on-site or at one of our Calibration Service Centers, |
Inclusive with all these services, we provide total program management including logistical, remediation and consultation services when needed.
We strive to provide the broadest accredited calibration offering to our targeted markets, which includes certification of our technicians pursuant to the American Society for Quality standards, complete calibration management encompassing the entire metrology function, and access to our complementary service and product offerings. We believe our calibration services are of the highest technical and quality levels, with broad ranges of accreditation.
Our quality systems are further detailed in the section entitled “Quality” below.
Proprietary Asset Management Software.CalTrak®.CalTrak® is our proprietary documentation and asset management systemsoftware which is used to integrate and manage both the workflow of our Calibration Service Centers of Excellence and our customers’ assets. With CalTrak®, we are able to provide our customers with timely and consistent calibration service while optimizing our own efficiencies. CalTrak® has been validated to U.S. federal regulations 21 CFR Part 820.75 and 21 CFR Part 11, as applicable. This validation is important to the pharmaceutical and other FDA-regulated industries where federal regulations can be particularly stringent.
Additionally, CalTrak® Online provides our customers with web-based asset management capability and a safe and secure off-site archive of calibration and other service records that can be accessed 24 hours a day through our secure password-protected website.
Our newly developed cloud-based customer portal and asset management tool (“C3®”) is scheduled to replace CalTrak® Online in our fiscal year 2018. C3® stands for Compliance, Control and Cost, and at Transcat we see these as the major areas of focus for our clients within the regulatory environment as it relates to instrument calibration. We specifically designed C3® to assist our customers in increasing efficiency, driving compliance to quality systems and enhancing control of instrumentation, all while bringing their overall metrology costs down. Understanding the regulated environments that our clients operate within, we customized the platform to allow for single system of record utilization via capabilities that allow clients to track and manage instruments maintained internally in addition to instruments supported by Transcat. C3® is validated to 21 CFR Part 820.75 and 21 CFR Part 11 to meet stringent FDA requirements.
Through CalTrak® and CalTrak® Online and C3®, each customer calibration is tracked and automatically cross-referenced to the assets used to perform the calibration, providing traceability.
Service Marketing and Sales.Under our integrated sales model, we have both inside and outside sales teams that seek to acquire new customers in our targeted markets.markets by leveraging our unique value proposition, including our broad geographic footprint and comprehensive suite of services. We target regulated, enterprise customers with multiple manufacturing operations throughout North America. We leverage our ability to manage the complete life cycle of instrumentation from purchase of calibrated equipment to long-term service and maintenance requirements. Connecting all the dots by using new and used product sales, rentals, and repair and calibration services is the goal of our marketing and sales initiatives. We also have a team of account managers focused on servicing the needs of our existing customers. In addition, we employ our Master Catalog, supplements, mailings, journal advertising,We utilize print media, trade shows and the Internetweb-based initiatives to market our services to customers and prospective customers with a strategic focus in the highly regulated industries including pharmaceuticallife science and other FDA-regulated industries, aerospace and defense, energy and utilities, and chemical manufacturing. We also target industrial manufacturing and other industries that appreciate the value of quality calibrations. Our quality process and standards are designed to meet the needs
The approximate percentage of our Service revenue by industry type for the periods indicated are as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | ||||
| Life Science/FDA-regulated | 43% | 39% | 32% | |||
| Industrial Manufacturing | 21% | 24% | 29% | |||
| Energy/Utilities | 7% | 7% | 8% | |||
| Chemical Manufacturing | 6% | 6% | 7% | |||
| Other | 23% | 24% | 24% | |||
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 | |||
| Pharmaceutical/FDA-regulated | 34% | 34% | 31% | ||
| Industrial Manufacturing | 29% | 28% | 27% | ||
| Energy/Utilities | 8% | 8% | 12% | ||
| Chemical Manufacturing | 7% | 7% | 8% | ||
| Other | 22% | 23% | 22% | ||
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Service Competition.The calibration services industry is highly fragmented and is composed of companies ranging from internationally recognized and accredited corporations, such as Transcat,OEM’s, to non-accredited sole proprietors as well as companies that perform their own calibrations in-house, resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and capabilities. A large percentage of calibration companies are small businesses that maygenerally do not have a range of capabilities as broad as ours. There are also several companies with whom we compete that have national or regional operations.
We differentiate ourselves from our competitors by demonstrating our commitment to quality, and by having a wide range of capabilities that are tailored to the markets we serve. Customers see the value in using ourserve, having a geographical footprint that spans North America and by providing a comprehensive suite of services that spans many manufacturers and is not limited to certain product lines or brands. Our unique CalTrak® Online asset and data management program to monitor their instrument’s status, history and performance data. We are fundamentally different from most of our competitors because we have the ability to bundle our products with our LIS and calibration services also provides a high level of differentiation from our competitors. As one of the only North American LIS and calibration service providers who also distributes product, our customers can seamlessly replace instruments that cannot be calibrated or are otherwise deemed to be at end of life. Our close knowledge of the products we distribute also allows our service staff to consult and advise customers on what products are best suited for their in-house calibration complianceneeds. We also believe that our proprietary software is a key differentiator from our competitors. CalTrak Online® and other servicesC3® are utilized by our customers in an integrated manner, providing a competitive barrier as customers realize synergies and efficiencies as a single sourceresult of this integration.
In fiscal year 2017, we further expanded our range of capabilities by making significant capital and human resource investments in reference-level radio frequency/microwave calibration capabilities that have allowed us to further expand our offerings and compete for our customers.
Competition for compliancelaboratory instrument services is comprisedcomposed of both small local and regional service providers and large multi-national companies who are alsomultinational OEMs. WhileWe believe we are generally financially strongstronger, service a larger customer base and are typically able to offer a larger suite of services than many of the small local and regional competitors, thecompetitors. The large OEMs may offer specialized services and brand-specific expertise which we do not offer, but they are generally much largerfocused on providing specialized services only for their proprietary brands and product lines, rather than servicing an array of brands and product lines as we are and may have more resources. Ourdo. We believe our competitive advantages in the laboratory instrument services market are our financial and technical resources, turnaround time, and flexibility and our turn-around time. We believe we canto react quickly to customers’ needs more quicklyneeds. The breadth of our suite of laboratory instrument service, combined with our calibration service offerings, also differentiates us from our competitors by allowing us to be our customers’ one-source accredited services provider for their entire calibration and effectively than our competitors.
Service Quality.Quality. The accreditation process is the only system currently in existence that validates measurement competence. To ensure that the quality and consistency of our customer calibrations are consistent with the global metrology network, designed to standardize measurements worldwide, we have sought and achieved international levels of quality and accreditation.accreditation to provide uniformity across all locations with advanced levels of training for our technical staff. Our Calibration Service Centers of Excellence are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 by National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (“NVLAP”) and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 usingother accrediting bodies. These accrediting bodies in the United States that are signatories to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (“ILAC”). These accrediting bodies, which, are proficient in the technical aspects of the chemistry and physics that underlie metrology, and provide an objective, third party,third-party, internationally accepted evaluation of the quality, consistency, and competency of our calibration processes. Accreditation also requires that all measurement standards used for accredited measurements have a fully documented path, known as Metrological Traceability, through the National Institute of Standards and Technology or the National Research Council (these are the(the National Measurement Institutes for the United States and Canada, respectively), or to other national or international standards bodies, or to measurable conditions created in our calibration service center,Calibration Service Center, or accepted fundamental and/or natural physical constants, ratio type of calibration, or by comparison to consensus standards, all inclusive of measurement uncertainties.
The importance of this international oversight to our customers is the assurance that our documentsservice documentation will be accepted worldwide, removing one of the barriers to trade that they may experience if using a non-ILAC traceable calibration service provider. To provide the widest range of services to our customers in our target markets, our ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditations extend across many technical disciplines, including working-level and reference-level capabilities. We believe our scope of accreditation to ISO/IEC 1702517025:2005 to be the broadest for the industries we serve.
Acquired calibration labs might use other quality registration systems. We continually evaluate when to integrate acquired quality systems with the focus on minimizing business disruptions and disruptions to our customers.
Our scopes of accreditation can be found athttp://www.transcat.com/calibration-services/accreditation/calibration-lab-certificates.
Distribution Segment
Distribution Summary.We distribute professional grade test, measurement and control instrumentation throughout North America and internationally. Our customers use test and measurement instruments to ensure that their processes, and ultimately their end products, are within specification. Utilization of such diagnostic instrumentation also allows for continuous improvement processes to be in place, increasing the accuracies of their measurements. The industrial test and measurement instrumentation market, in those geographic areas where we predominately operate, ishas historically been serviced by broad-based national equipment distributors and niche or specialty-focused organizations such as Transcat. We offer value-added services such as calibration/certification of equipment purchases, equipment rentals, used equipment for sale, and equipment kitting. In recent years, online-based distributors have become more prevalent. To more effectively compete with these online-based distributors, we have continued to make improvements to our digital platform, including enhanced e-commerce capabilities.
We believe that maintaining an in-house inventorya customer chooses a distributor based on a number of back-up testdifferent criteria, including product availability, price, ease of doing business, timely delivery and measurement instruments is cost prohibitive. As a result,accuracy of orders, consistent product quality, technical competence of the distributionrepresentative serving them and availability of test and measurement instrumentation has traditionally been characterized by frequent, small quantity orders combined with a need for rapid, reliable, and complete order fulfillment.value-added services. The decision to buy is generally made by plant engineers, quality managers, or their purchasing personnel, and products are typically obtained from one or more distributors.distributors as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and research and development facilities. As a result, sales to Distribution customers are somewhat unpredictable and potentially non-recurring. Our on-line presence, including our website and e-newsletters; Master Catalog,Catalog; supplemental catalogs, website, e-newsletters,mailings and other sales and marketing activities are designed to create demand and maintain a constant presence in front of our customers to ensure we receive the order when they are ready to purchase.
We provide our customers with value addedvalue-added services including technical support, to insureensure our customer receivescustomers receive the right product for their specific need through application, knowledge and product compatibility, andmore comprehensive instrument suitability studies to customers in regulated industries who are concerned about the technical uncertainties that their testing or in-process instruments may bring to a process. We consider our biggest value-added service for our Distribution customers is the option to have calibration service performed on their new product purchases prior to shipment.shipment, allowing them to place newly acquired equipment directly into service upon receipt, saving downtime. We also offer online procurement, credit card payment options, same day shipment of in-stock items, kitted products, the option to rent, training programs and a variety of custom product offerings. Items are regularly added to and deleted from our product offerings on the basis of customer demand, recommendations of suppliers, sales volumes and training programs.other factors. Because of the breadth of our product and service offerings, we are often a “one-stop shop” for our customers who gain operational efficiency by dealing with just one distributor for most or all of their test and measurement instrumentation needs.
In fiscal year 2017, our Distribution segment accounted for 59% of our total revenuerebounded from a decline in sales in fiscal year 2014. Within2016. We attributed the fiscal year 2016 sales decline to continued competitive pressures as well as the recessionary conditions experienced in U.S. industrial output in general and in the oil and gas industry in particular. To mitigate the impact of competition and recessionary market conditions, we expanded the number of new equipment items on which we offer pre-shipment calibration, grew our organic rental business and through the acquisition of Excalibur, forayed into the used equipment sales market and rental market for higher-end electronics. We will continue to use these and other efforts to bolster sales in the Distribution segment our routine business is comprisedin an effort to stabilize the recent unpredictability and uncertainty of customers who place orders to acquire new instrumentation or to upgrade or replace old instrumentation. Our averagethe Distribution order is approximately $1,900. Items are regularly added to and deleted from our product offerings on the basis of customer demand, recommendations of suppliers, sales volumes and other factors.
Distribution Marketing and Sales.We market, create demand and sell to our customers through multiple direct sales channels consisting of direct catalog marketing,including our website, digital and other web-basedprint advertising, proactive outbound sales and an inbound call center. Our outbound and inbound sales teams are staffed with technically trained personnel who are available to help guide product selection. Alternately, customers may purchase products through our website at transcat.com. Our website serves as a sales channel for our products and services, and products, and provides product availability,search capability, detailed product information, ability to search products,in-stock availability, selection guides, demo videos and downloadable product specification sheets. We have made investments in our website to implement the latest marketing technologies which allow us to provide an intuitive customer experience, with simple product comparison and quoting, ease at checkout and automated post-order follow-up. We also operate and maintain several industry-specific service websites, obtained through recent business acquisitions.
We use a multichannel approach to reach our annualcustomers and prospective customers including our Master Catalog, periodic supplemental catalogs, website, e-newsletters, and other direct sales and marketing programs, we offerprograms. Our digital marketing strategy includes ongoing investment in search engine optimization, application-specific digital content, pay-per-click search engine advertising, and product listings on online marketplaces such as Amazon and Google Shopping. We continue to invest in back-end technologies designed to provide a seamless customer experience across all our customers a broad selection of highly recognized branded products at competitive prices. The instruments typically range in price from $100 to over $25,000.
As a result of strong relationships with our product vendors and our historical performance of effectively marketing, we have the opportunity to carry out co-branded marketing initiatives, aimed at our existing customers and our prospective customer base, for which we receive cooperative advertising income.support. These co-branded marketing initiatives typically feature specific vendors, new products or targeted product categories and take the form of direct mailers, web-based initiatives or outbound sales efforts.
In fiscal year 2017, the acquisition of Excalibur brought us a network of experienced independent sales representatives who are currently focused on selling new and used equipment and equipment rentals, but who also have the ability to sell our comprehensive suite of calibration services.
Distribution Competition.Competition. The distribution market for industrial test and measurement instrumentation is quite fragmented and highly competitive. Our competitors range from large national distributors and manufacturers that sell directly to customers to small local distributors. In addition, web-based distributors, have become more prevalentand in recent years, and are increasing their market share.online distributors. Key competitive factors typically include customer service and support, quality, turnaroundlead time, inventory availability, brand recognition and price. To address our customers’ needs for technical support and product application assistance, and to differentiate ourselves from competitors, we employ a staff of highly-trainedhighly trained technical sales specialists. In order to maintain this competitive advantage, technical training is an integral part of developing our sales staff. To differentiate ourselves from competitors, we offer pre-shipment calibration or performance data reports which allow customers to receive our products and immediately place them into service, saving them downtime and money.
In acknowledgementrecent years, online distributors, including Amazon for lower price-point products, have become prominent competitors for sales of handheld test and measurement equipment, competing primarily on price. While online competitors lack the value-added services we offer in our Distribution segment, they have been successful in capturing some market share in the worldwide market for test and measurement instruments. To stay ahead of growing competition from web-basedthese online distributors and the overall general trend of increased use of e-commerce, we beganhave invested in our digital platform including a significant overhaulwell-indexed website with improved design and redesign offunctionality. In addition, we have diversified our website in fiscal year 2014. Improvements made toofferings by expanding the brands and product lines that we offer and adding higher gross margin equipment rentals and used equipment sales, which we believe makes Transcat unique among our website are focused around enhancing customer experience through ease of use, better browsing and search functions, increased content capabilities and recommendations for complimentary products and services. Additionally, we are redesigning our website to allow us greater flexibility and scalability and to enhance our ability to react quickly to changes in the marketplace. We expect to launch our redesigned website during the second quarter of fiscal year 2015.
Distribution Suppliers and Purchasing.We believe that effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and measurement instruments. We frequently evaluate our purchase requirements and suppliers’ offerings to obtain products at the best possible cost. We obtain our products from approximately 450over 430 suppliers of brand name and private-labeled equipment. In fiscal year 2014,2017, our top 10 vendors accounted for approximately 66%59% of our aggregate Distribution business. Approximately one-thirdone-quarter of our product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke Electronics CorporationElectronicsCorporation (“Fluke”), which we believe to be consistent with Fluke’s share of the markets we serve.
We plan our product mix and inventory stock to best serve the anticipated needs of our customers, whose individual purchases vary in size. We can usually ship to our customers our top selling products to our customers the same day they are ordered.
Distribution Vendor Rebates.We have agreements with certain product vendors that allowprovide for rebates based on meeting a specified cumulative level of purchases and/or incremental distribution sales. These rebates are recorded as a reduction of cost of distribution sales. Purchase rebates are calculated and recorded quarterly based upon our volume of purchases with specific vendors during the quarter. Point of sale rebate programs that are based upon annualon year-over-year sales performance on a calendar year basis and are recorded as earned, on a quarterly basis, based upon the expectedestimated level of annual achievement. Point of sale rebate programs that are based on year-over-year sales performance on a quarterly basis are recorded as earned in the respective quarter.
Distribution Operations.Operations. Our distributionDistribution operations primarily take place within an approximateat our 37,250 square-foot facility in Rochester, New York and a 12,600 square-foot facility in Portland, Oregon. The Rochester location also serves as our corporate headquarters;headquarters, houses our customer service, sales and administrative functions;functions, and hasis a calibration service center.Calibration Service Center. The Portland location also serves asis a calibration service center.Calibration Service Center. In fiscal year 2014,2017, we shipped approximately 36,00033,000 product orders, in the aggregate, from both locations. In addition, weWe also have two smaller warehouse facilities in Wisconsin that fulfill orders for scales.
Distribution Backlog.Backlog.Distribution orders include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to be calibrated in one of our Calibration Service Centers of Excellence prior to shipment, orders required by the customer to be shipped complete or at a future date, and other orders awaiting final credit or management review prior to shipment.
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORT
Key elements of our customer service approach are our field business development sales team, outbound sales team, account management team, inbound sales and customer service organization. Most customer orders are placed through our customer service organization. To ensure the quality of service provided, we frequently monitor our customer service through customer surveys, call monitoring and daily statistical reports.
Customers may place orders via: | |
| ● | Mail to Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY 14624; |
Fax at 1-800-395-0543; |
Telephone at 1-800-828-1470; |
Email |
Online at |
INFORMATION REGARDING EXPORT SALES
In fiscal years 20122015 through 2014,2017, approximately 10% of our total revenue resulted from sales to customers outside the United States. Of those export sales in fiscal year 2014,2017, approximately 20%14% were denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining 80%86% were in Canadian dollars. Our revenue is subject to the customary risks of operating in an international environment, including the potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions, tariff and other tax increases, fluctuations in exchange rates and unstable political situations, any one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet or results of operations. See “Foreign Currency” in Item 7A7A. of Part II and Note 7 ofto our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for further details.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
We utilize a turnkey enterprise software solution from Infor, Inc. (“Infor”) called Application Plus to manage our business and operations segments. This software includes a suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business functions, including customer service, warehouse management, inventory management, financial management, customer relations management and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature business package and has been subject to more than 20 years of refinement. During fiscal year 2013, we completed implementation ofWe utilize customer relationship management (“CRM”) software offered by SalesForce.com, Inc. SalesForce.com, Inc., which is strategically partnered with Infor, Inc., which allowedallowing us to fully integrate the CRM software with our Infor enterprise software.
We also utilize CalTrak®, our proprietary document and asset management system, to manage documentation, workflow and customers’ assets within and amongst most of our calibration service centers.Calibration Service Centers. In addition to functioning as an internal documentation, workflow, and asset management system, CalTrak®, through CalTrak® Online and C3®, provides customers with web-based calibration cycle management service and access to documentation relating to services completed by Transcat.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We have federally registered trademarks for Transcat®, CalTrak® and CalTrak®C3®, which we consider to be of material importance to our business. The registrations for these trademarks encompass multiple classes, and the registrations are in good standing with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Our CalTrak® trademark is also registered in Canada for one class with the Canada Intellectual Property Office. Our trademark registrations must be renewed at various times, and we intend to renew our trademarks, as necessary, for the foreseeable future.
We have filed an application with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to trademark in one class the brand name “Procision” in the United States. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office is currently examining the application.
In addition, we own www.transcat.com. and www.transcat.ca. As with phone numbers, we do not have and cannot acquire any property rights to an Internet address. The regulation of domain names in the United States and in other countries is also subject to change. Regulatory bodies could establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names. As a result, we might not be able to maintain our domain names or obtain comparable domain names, which could harm our business.
SEASONALITY
Our business has certain historical seasonal factors. Historically, our fiscal third and fourth quarters have been stronger than our fiscal first and second quarters due to the operating cycles of our industrial operating cycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
We believe that we are in compliance with federal, state, orand local provisions relating to the protection of the environment, and that continued compliance will not have any material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2014,2017, we had 407585 employees, including 627 part-time employees, compared with 412537 employees, including 1011 part-time employees, at the end of fiscal year 2013.
MANAGEMENT TEAM
The following table presents certain information regarding our management team, including our executive officers and certain key employees as of March 29, 2014:
Name | Age | Position | ||
| Lee D. Rudow | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
| Vice President of Human Resources | ||||
| Vice President of Inside Sales and Marketing | ||||
| Benjamin P. Hawley | 60 | Vice President of Operational Excellence | ||
| Scott D. | ||||
| Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, therefore, we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such reports may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains a website (sec.gov)(sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy statements and other information for registrants that file electronically.
We maintain a website at transcat.com.transcat.com. We make available, free of charge, in the Investor Relations section of our website, documents we file with or furnish to the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports. We make this information available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish such information to, the SEC. The other information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
We also post on our website our board of directors’ committee charters (audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating committee), and Code of Ethics. Copies of such documents are available in print at no charge to any shareholder who makes a request. Such requests should be made to our corporate secretary at our corporate headquarters, 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624.
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other information included in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this report are not the only ones facing our business. If any of the following risks were to actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could fall and you could lose all or part of your investment.
We depend on manufacturers to supply inventory to our Distribution segment and rely on one vendor to supply a significant amount of our inventory purchases. If our vendor fails to provide desired products to us, increases prices, or fails to timely deliver products, our revenue and gross profit could suffer.A significant amount of our inventory purchases are made from one vendor, Fluke. Our reliance on this vendor leaves us vulnerable to having an inadequate supply of required products, price increases, late deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other distributors in our industry, we occasionally experience supplier shortages and are unable to purchase our desired volume of products. If we are unable to enter into and maintain satisfactory distribution arrangements with leading manufacturers, if we are unable to maintain an adequate supply of products, or if manufacturers do not regularly invest in, introduce to us, and/or make new products available to us for distribution, our Distribution segment sales could suffer considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance that particular products, or product lines, will be available to us, or available in quantities sufficient to meet customer demand. This is of particular significance to our Distribution segment business because the products we sell are often only available from one source. Any limits to product access could materially and adversely affect our Distribution segment business.
Volatility in the oil and gas industry has had and could continue to have a negative impact on our operating results. A portion of our products and services customer base is directly or indirectly related to the oil and gas industry. As a result, demand for some of our products is dependent on the level of expenditures by the oil and gas industry. In addition to the more significant impact on our Distribution segment, an extended downturn in the oil and gas industry or continued volatility in oil and gas prices could impact customers’ demand for some of our services (generally excluding life sciences, our largest industry customer sector), which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our future success may be affected by our current and future indebtedness.Under our revolving credit facility,agreement, as of March 29, 2014,25, 2017, we owed $7.6$27.3 million to our secured creditor.creditor, a commercial bank, including $8.7 million we borrowed on April 1, 2016 via a $10.0 million term loan to fund an acquisition and provide us additional working capital. We may borrow additional funds in the future to support our growth and working capital needs. We are required to meet financial tests on a quarterly basis and comply with other covenants customary in secured financings. Although we believe that we will continue to comply with such covenants, if we do not remain in compliance with such covenants, our lender may demand immediate repayment of amounts outstanding. Changes in interest rates may have a significant effect on our payment obligations and operating results. Furthermore, we are dependent on credit from manufacturers of our products to fund our inventory purchases. If our debt burden increases to high levels, such manufacturers may restrict our credit. Our cash requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the rate of growth of our revenues, the timing and levels of products purchased, payment terms, and credit limits from manufacturers, the timing and level of our accounts receivable collections and our ability to manage our business profitably. Our ability to satisfy our existing obligations, whether or not under our secured credit facility, will depend upon our future operating performance, which may be impacted by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, and other factors described in this report, many of which are beyond our control.
The relatively low trading volume of our common stock may limit your ability to sell your shares.Although our shares of common stock are listed on theThe NASDAQ Global Market, we have historically experienced a relatively low trading volume.volume of less than 10,000 shares a day. If our low trading volume continues in the future, holders of our shares may have difficulty selling a large number of shares of our common stock in the manner or at a price that might otherwise be attainable.they desire.
If significant existing shareholders sell large numbers of shares of our common stock, our stock price could decline.The market price of our common stock could decline if a large number of our shares are sold in the public market by our existing shareholders or holders of stock options or as a result of the perception that these sales could occur. Due to the relatively low trading volume of our common stock, the sale of a large number of shares of our common stock may significantly depress the price of our common stock.
We expect that our quarterly results of operations will fluctuate. Such fluctuation could cause our stock price to decline.A large portion of our expenses for our Service segment, including expenses for facilities, equipment and personnel are relatively fixed. Accordingly, if revenues decline or do not grow as we anticipate, we may not be able to correspondingly reduce our operating expenses in any particular quarter. Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the future. Historically, our fiscal third and fourth quarters have been stronger than our fiscal first and second quarters due to industrial operating cycles. Fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell and services we provide could cause our revenues and operating results to fluctuate. If our operating results in some quarters fail to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our stock price may decline.
Our stock price may be volatile.The stock market, from time to time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance of companies. Our stock may be affected by market volatility and by our own performance. The following factors, among others, may have a significant effect on the market price of our common stock: | |
| ● | Developments in our relationships with current or future manufacturers of products we distribute; |
| ● | Announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
| ● | Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements involving us or our industry; |
| ● | Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other crises; |
| ● | Sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market; |
| ● | Repurchases of our common stock on the open market or in privately-negotiated transactions; |
| ● | Period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results; and |
| ● | Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. |
Our business acquisitions or future business acquisition efforts, which are important to our growth, may not be successful, which may limit our growth or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.AcquisitionsBusiness acquisitions have been an important part of our growth to date. As part of our business strategy, we may make additional acquisitions of companies that could complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage, provide us with important relationships or otherwise offer us growth opportunities. If we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate successfully the terms of or finance the acquisition. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate the operations of our acquisitions without encountering difficulties, including unanticipated costs, possible difficulty in retaining customers and supplier or manufacturing relationships, failure to retain key employees, the diversion of our management’s attention or failure to integrate our information and accounting systems. We may not realize the revenues and cost savings that we expect to achieve or that would justify the investments, and we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate. To effectively manage our expected future growth, we must continue to successfully manage our integration of the companies that we acquire and continue to improve our operational systems, internal procedures, accounts receivable and management, financial and operational controls. If we fail in any of these areas,to successfully acquire businesses, our business growth and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may not successfully integrate business acquisitions.We completed a total of six business acquisitions during fiscal years 2016 and 2017. If we fail to accurately assess and successfully integrate any recent or future business acquisitions, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits, which could result in lower revenues, unanticipated operating expenses, reduced profitability and dilution of our book value per share. Successful integration involves many challenges, including: | |
| ● | The difficulty of integrating acquired operations and personnel with our existing operations; |
| ● | The difficulty of developing and marketing new products and services; |
| ● | The diversion of our management’s attention as a result of evaluating, negotiating and integrating acquisitions; |
| ● | Our exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; and |
| ● | The loss of key employees of an acquired operation. |
In addition, an acquisition could adversely impact cash flows and/or operating results, and dilute shareholder interests, for many reasons, including: | |
| ● | Charges to our income to reflect the impairment of acquired intangible assets, including goodwill; |
| ● | Interest costs and debt service requirements for any debt incurred in connection with an acquisition or new business venture; and |
| ● | Any issuance of securities in connection with an acquisition or new business venture that dilutes or lessens the rights of our current shareholders. |
If the integration of any or all of our acquisitions or future acquisitions is not successful, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and stock price.
Any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could negatively impact our results of operations.Our goodwill and other intangible assets are subject to an impairment test on an annual basis and are also tested whenever events and circumstances
The financing of any future acquisitions we might make may result in dilution to your stock ownership and/or could increase our leverage and our risk of defaulting on our bank debt.Our business strategy includes expansion into new markets and enhancement of our position in existing markets, including through acquisitions. In order to successfully complete targeted acquisitions, we may issue additional equity securities that could dilute your stock ownership. We may also incur additional debt if we acquire another company, which could significantly increase our leverage and our risk of default under our existing credit facility.
Adverse changes in general economic conditions or uncertainty about future economic conditions could adversely affect us.We are subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in general economic market conditions. Uncertainty about future economic conditions could negatively affect our current and prospective customers causing them to delay the purchase of necessary services or test and measurement instruments. Poor economic conditions could harm our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.
The U.S. Congress and Trump administration may make substantial changes to fiscal, tax, regulation and other federal policies that may adversely affect our business.
The industries in which we compete are highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully.Within our Service segment, we provide calibration services and compete in an industry that is highly fragmented and is composed of companies ranging from internationally recognized and accredited corporations to non-accredited sole proprietors, resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and capabilities. Also, within our Service segment, we provide compliance services and compete in an industry that is comprisedcomposed of both small local and regional service providers and large multi-national companies who are also OEMs. Within our Service segment, some of our larger competitors may have broader service capabilities and may have greater name recognition than us. Some manufacturers of the products we sell may also offer calibration and compliance services for their products.
Within our Distribution segment, we compete with numerous companies, including several major manufacturers and distributors. Most of our products are available from several sources and our customers tend to have relationships with several distributors. Competitors in the product distribution industry could also obtain exclusive rights to market particular products, which we would then be unable to market. Manufacturers could also increase their efforts to sell directly to end-users and bypass distributors like us. Industry consolidation among distributors, the unavailability of products, whether due to our inability to gain access to products or interruptions in supply from manufacturers, or the emergence of new competitors could also increase competition and adversely affect our business or results of operations.
In each of the industries in which we compete, some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do, which could allow them to compete more successfully. In the future, we may be unable to compete successfully and competitive pressures may reduce our sales.
Our Service segment has a high concentration of customers in the Pharmaceuticallife science and other FDA-regulated and Industrial Manufacturing Industries. industrial manufacturing industries.MostA number of our Service segment customers operate in the pharmaceutical and other FDA-regulated or industrial manufacturing industries. This concentration of our customer base affects our overall risk profile, since a significant portion of our customers willwould be similarly affected by changes in economic, political, regulatory, and other industry conditions. We anticipate that our Service segment will continue to grow and comprise a greater percentage of our total revenue, which willcould increase our exposure to fluctuations in the pharmaceuticallife science and other FDA-regulated or industrial manufacturing industries. An abrupt or unforeseen change in conditions in these industries could adversely affect customer demand for our services, which could have a material adverse affecteffect on our financial results.
Competition in our Distribution segment is changing with an increase in web-based distributors. We may not be able to compete successfully.We face substantial and increased competition throughout the world, especially in our Distribution segment where, until an upturn in revenues in fiscal year 2017, we had experienced a gradual decline in sales. The competition is changing, with web-based distributors becoming more prevalent and increasing their market share. Some of our competitors are much larger than us. Changes in the competitive landscape pose new challenges that could adversely affect our ability to compete. Entry or expansion of other vendors into this market may establish competitors that have larger customer bases and substantially greater financial and other resources with which to pursue marketing and distribution of products. Their current customer base and relationships, as well as their relationships and ability to negotiate with manufacturers, may also provide them with a competitive advantage. If we are unable to effectively compete with our current and future competitors, our ability to sell products could be harmed and could result in a negative impact on our Distribution segment. Any erosion of our competitive position could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Cybersecurity incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business, results of operations or financial condition.Global cybersecurity threats can range from uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology (“IT”) systems to sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats. While we employ comprehensive measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats (including access controls, data encryption, vulnerability assessments, management training, continuous monitoring of our IT networks and systems and maintenance of backup and protective systems), cybersecurity incidents, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially result in the misappropriation, destruction, corruption or unavailability of critical data or proprietary information and the disruption of business operations. The potential consequences of a material cybersecurity incident include reputational damage, litigation with third parties, and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, which in turn could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our enterprise resource planning system is aging and we may experience issues from any implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system.We have an enterprise resource planning system (“ERP” or “Application Plus”) to assist with the collection, storage, management and interpretation of data from our business activities to support future growth and to integrate significant processes. Although we use current versions of software and have support agreements in place, due to the age of our ERP, we anticipate that a new ERP will be required to be implemented in the future. ERP implementations are complex and time-consuming and involve substantial expenditures on system software and implementation activities, as well as changes in business processes. Our ERP system is critical to our ability to accurately maintain books and records, record transactions, provide important information to our management and prepare our consolidated financial statements. ERP implementations also require the transformation of business and financial processes in order to reap the benefits of the ERP system; any such transformation involves risks inherent in the conversion to a new computer system, including loss of information and potential disruption to our normal operations. Any disruptions, delays or deficiencies in the design and implementation of a new ERP system could adversely affect our ability to process orders, provide services and customer support, send invoices and track payments, fulfill contractual obligations or otherwise operate our business. Additionally, if the ERP system does not operate as intended, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting could be adversely affected or our ability to assess it adequately could be delayed.
We rely on our CalTrak®,Application Plus (our ERP) and other management information systems for inventory management, distribution, workflow, accounting and other functions. If our CalTrak®,Application Plus andor other management information systems fail to adequately perform these functions, experience an interruption in their operation or a security breach, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.The efficient operation of our business depends on our management information systems. We rely on our CalTrak®, Application Plus and other management information systems to effectively manage accounting and financial functions, customer service, warehouse management, order entry, order fulfillment, inventory replenishment, documentation, asset management, and workflow. Our management information systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses or hackers, natural or man-made disasters, vandalism, terrorist attacks, power loss, or other computer systems, internet, telecommunications or data network failures. Any such interruptions to our management information systems could disrupt our business and could result in decreased revenues, increased overhead costs, excess inventory and product shortages, causing our business and results of operations to suffer. In addition, our management information systems are vulnerable to security breaches. Our security measures or those of our third-party service providers may fail to detect or prevent such security breaches. Security breaches could result in the unauthorized publication of our confidential business or proprietary information, the unauthorized release of customer, vendor, or employee data and payment information, the violation of privacy or other laws, and the exposure to litigation, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.
If we fail to adapt our technology to meet customer needs and preferences, the demand for our products and services may diminish. Our future success will depend on our ability to develop services and solutions that keep pace with technological change, evolving industry standards and changing customer preferences in the markets we serve. We cannot be sure that we will be successful in adapting existing or developing new technology or services in a timely or cost-effective manner or that the solutions we do develop will be successful in the marketplace. Our failure to keep pace with changes in technology, industry standards and customer preferences in the markets we serve could diminish our ability to retain and attract customers and our competitive position, which could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
We face risks associated with foreign currency rate fluctuations.We currently transact a portion of our business in foreign currencies, namely the Canadian dollar. During fiscal years 2017 and 2016, less than 10% of our total revenues were denominated in Canadian dollars. Conducting business in currencies other than U.S. dollars subjects us to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could have a negative impact on our reported operating results. Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar impacts our revenues, cost of revenues and operating margins and result in foreign currency transaction gains and losses. During fiscal years 2017 and 2016, the value of the U.S. dollar relative to one Canadian dollar ranged from 1.25 to 1.36 and from 1.20 to 1.46, respectively.
We continually utilize short-term foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. However, this strategy does not eliminate our exposure. If there is a significant or prolonged downturn in the Canadian dollar, it could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition.
If we fail to attract qualified personnel, we may not be able to achieve our stated corporate objectives.Our ability to manage our anticipated growth, if realized, effectively depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers and technical personnel. If we fail to attract and retain qualified individuals, we will not be able to achieve our stated corporate objectives.
Our revenue depends on retaining capable sales personnel and highly-skilledhighly skilled service technicians as well as maintaining existing relationships with key customers, key vendors and manufacturers of the products that we distribute.Our future operating results depend on our ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with qualified sales personnel and skilled service technicians as well as key customers, vendors and manufacturers who appreciate the value of our services. If we fail to maintain our existing relationships with such persons or fail to acquire relationships with such key persons in the future, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our future success is substantially dependent upon our senior management.Our future success is substantially dependent upon the efforts and abilities of members of our existing senior management. Competition for senior management is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining key personnel, the inability of which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Tax legislation initiatives could adversely affect the Company’sour net earnings and tax liabilities.We are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the United States federal, state and local governments, as well as foreign jurisdictions. From time to time, various legislative initiatives may be proposedenacted that could adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rate will not be adversely affected by these initiatives. In addition, tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. Although we believe that our historical tax positions are sound and consistent with applicable laws, regulations and existing precedent, there can be no assurance that our tax positions will not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would be successful in any such challenge.
As a "smaller reporting company"company," we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which may cause investors to have less confidence in our internal control over financial reporting.The auditor attestation requirement under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides that a public company's independent auditor must attest to and report on management's internal control over financial reporting. Because we qualify as a "smaller reporting company" under the applicable SEC regulation, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirement. The lack of an auditor attestation concerning management's internal control over financial reporting may cause investors to have less confidence in our internal control over financial reporting and increases the risk that any material weakness or other deficiencies in our internal controls will not be detected.
Changes in accounting standards, legal requirements and theThe NASDAQ stock marketGlobal Market listing standards, or our ability to comply with any existing requirements or standards, could adversely affect our operating results.Extensive reforms relating to public company financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics, The NASDAQ StockGlobal Market listing standards and oversight of the accounting profession have been implemented over the past several years and continue to evolve. Compliance with these rules, regulations and standards that have resulted from such reforms has increased our accounting and legal costs and has required significant management time and attention. In the event that additional rules, regulations or standards are implemented or any of the existing rules, regulations or standards to which we are subject undergoes additional material modification, we could be forced to spend significant financial and management resources to ensure our continued compliance, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, although we believe we are in full compliance with all such existing rules, regulations and standards, should we be or become unable to comply with any of such rules, regulations and standards, as they presently exist or as they may exist in the future, our results of operations could be adversely effected and the market price of our common stock could decline.
Our stock priceinability to adequately enforce and protect our intellectual property or defend against assertions of infringement could prevent or restrict our ability to compete.
We rely on intellectual property in order to maintain a competitive advantage. Our inability to defend against the unauthorized use of these assets could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Litigation may be volatile. The stock market,necessary to protect our intellectual property rights or defend against claims of infringement. This litigation could result in significant costs and divert our management’s focus away from time to time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance of companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility, and by our own performance, the following factors, among others, may have a significant effect on the market price of our common stock:
The following table presents our leased and owned properties as of March 29, 2014:
| Approximate | ||||
| Property | Location | Footage | ||
| Corporate Headquarters, | Rochester, NY | 37,250 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | 12,000 | |||
| Calibration Service Center | Boston, MA | 4,000 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | ||||
| Burlington, ON | 14,152 | |||
| Calibration Service Center | Charlotte, NC | 4,860 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | Cherry Hill, NJ | 10,800 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | Dayton, OH | |||
| Calibration Service Center | Denver, CO | 19,441 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | Houston, TX | 10,333 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | ||||
| Calibration Service Center and Headquarters for Canadian Operations | Montreal, QC | 27,533 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | ||||
| Nashville, TN | 6,000 | |||
| Calibration Service Center | Ottawa, ON | 3,990 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | Tempe, AZ | 4,169 | ||
| Calibration Service Center and Distribution Center | Portland, OR | 12,600 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | San Juan, PR | 1,560 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | St. Louis, MO | 4,400 | ||
| United Scale & Engineering: | ||||
| Calibration Service Center | Green Bay, WI | 3,320 | ||
| Calibration Service Center and Warehouse | 6,000 | |||
| Calibration Service Center and Warehouse | 16,000 | |||
| Calibration Service Center | Ft. Wayne, IN | 3,600 | ||
| Calibration Service Center | San Diego, CA | 5,500 | ||
| Spectrum Technologies Inc. (“STI”): | ||||
| Unaccredited Service Center and Warehouse | Paxinos, PA | 14,520 | ||
| STI Satellite Service Office | Bakersfield, CA | 1,150 | ||
| STI Satellite Service Office | Richmond Hill, ON | 882 | ||
| STI Satellite Service Office | Birmingham, AL | 625 | ||
| STI Satellite Service Office | Melrose, FL | 200 | ||
| STI Satellite Service Office | Mt. Airy, NC | 200 | ||
| STI Satellite Service Office | LaCrosse, WI | 280 | ||
| Mobile Service Unit and Offices | Somerset, PA | 3,347 | ||
| Service Support Office | Mississauga, ON | 1,500 | ||
| Warehouse (1) | Lincoln, MT | 5,406 |
| (1) | Property owned by the Company |
We believe that our properties are in good condition, are well maintained and are generally suitable and adequate to carry on our business in its current form.
None.
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on theThe NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “TRNS.” “TRNS”. As of June 23, 2014,14, 2017, we had approximately 541439 shareholders of record.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table presents, on a per share basis, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our common stock as reported on theThe NASDAQ Global Market for each quarterly period in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013:2016:
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||
| Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | |||||||||
| Fiscal Year 2017: | ||||||||||||
| High | $ | 11.85 | $ | 11.05 | $ | 11.00 | $ | 14.05 | ||||
| Low | $ | 9.38 | $ | 8.26 | $ | 10.00 | $ | 10.30 | ||||
| Fiscal Year 2016: | ||||||||||||
| High | $ | 10.50 | $ | 10.00 | $ | 10.10 | $ | 10.41 | ||||
| Low | $ | 9.00 | $ | 8.76 | $ | 8.70 | $ | 8.81 | ||||
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
| Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | |||||||||||||
| Fiscal Year 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
| High | $ | 7.60 | $ | 8.81 | $ | 8.96 | $ | 9.85 | ||||||||
| Low | $ | 5.73 | $ | 6.41 | $ | 7.48 | $ | 7.65 | ||||||||
| Fiscal Year 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
| High | $ | 13.40 | $ | 7.00 | $ | 7.70 | $ | 7.10 | ||||||||
| Low | $ | 6.23 | $ | 5.30 | $ | 5.12 | $ | 5.73 | ||||||||
DIVIDENDS
Our credit agreement, as amended, limits our ability to pay cash dividends to $3.0 million in any fiscal year. We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and have no current plans to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
The following table provides selected financial data for fiscal year 20142017 and the previous four fiscal years (in thousands, except per share data). Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year.
| For the Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | March 28, | March 29, | March 30, | |||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
| Statements of Income Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | $ | 143,898 | $ | 122,166 | $ | 123,624 | $ | 118,508 | $ | 112,296 | |||||
| Total Cost of Revenue | 108,928 | 93,047 | 94,537 | 88,718 | 84,892 | ||||||||||
| Gross Profit | 34,970 | 29,119 | 29,087 | 29,790 | 27,404 | ||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | 27,036 | 22,817 | 22,319 | 23,085 | 21,458 | ||||||||||
| Operating Income | 7,934 | 6,302 | 6,768 | 6,705 | 5,946 | ||||||||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 770 | 295 | 345 | 259 | 228 | ||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 7,164 | 6,007 | 6,423 | 6,446 | 5,718 | ||||||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2,642 | 1,883 | 2,397 | 2,462 | 2,014 | ||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | $ | 4,026 | $ | 3,984 | $ | 3,704 | |||||
| For the Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | March 26, 2011 | March 28, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Statements of Income Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | $ | 118,508 | $ | 112,296 | $ | 110,020 | $ | 91,186 | $ | 81,061 | ||||||||||
| Total Cost of Revenue | 88,718 | 84,892 | 82,896 | 67,888 | 61,767 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross Profit | 29,790 | 27,404 | 27,124 | 23,298 | 19,294 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | 23,085 | 21,458 | 21,696 | 18,711 | 16,913 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 6,705 | 5,946 | 5,428 | 4,587 | 2,381 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 259 | 228 | 182 | 105 | 98 | |||||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 6,446 | 5,718 | 5,246 | 4,482 | 2,283 | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2,462 | 2,014 | 1,944 | 1,694 | 832 | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 3,984 | $ | 3,704 | $ | 3,302 | $ | 2,788 | $ | 1,451 | ||||||||||
| Share Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||||
| Basic Average Shares Outstanding | 7,080 | 7,404 | 7,309 | 7,290 | 7,352 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||||
| Diluted Average Shares Outstanding | 7,357 | 7,592 | 7,651 | 7,521 | 7,549 | |||||||||||||||
| Closing Price Per Share | $ | 9.28 | $ | 6.36 | $ | 13.11 | $ | 8.00 | $ | 7.14 | ||||||||||
As of or for the Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | March 26, 2011 | March 28, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheets and Working Capital Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory, net | $ | 6,181 | $ | 6,803 | $ | 6,396 | $ | 7,571 | $ | 5,906 | ||||||||||
| Property and Equipment, net | 7,089 | 6,885 | 5,306 | 5,253 | 4,163 | |||||||||||||||
| Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net | 20,035 | 21,283 | 15,839 | 13,648 | 11,272 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | 53,874 | 55,047 | 44,977 | 41,360 | 35,713 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | 2,945 | 2,702 | 2,896 | 2,293 | 2,080 | |||||||||||||||
| Capital Expenditures | 1,961 | 2,657 | 1,391 | 1,647 | 1,128 | |||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 7,593 | 8,017 | 3,365 | 5,253 | 2,532 | |||||||||||||||
| Shareholders' Equity | 30,083 | 31,650 | 27,378 | 23,329 | 20,257 | |||||||||||||||
| For the Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | March 28, | March 29, | March 30, | |||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
| Share Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.50 | |||||
| Basic Average Shares Outstanding | 6,994 | 6,887 | 6,798 | 7,080 | 7,404 | ||||||||||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.49 | |||||
| Diluted Average Shares Outstanding | 7,111 | 7,121 | 7,059 | 7,357 | 7,592 | ||||||||||
| Closing Price Per Share | $ | 12.52 | $ | 10.14 | $ | 9.59 | $ | 9.28 | $ | 6.36 | |||||
| As of or for the Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | March 28, | March 29, | March 30, | |||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
| Balance Sheets and Working Capital Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Inventory, net | $ | 10,278 | $ | 6,520 | $ | 6,750 | $ | 6,181 | $ | 6,803 | |||||
| Property and Equipment, net | 15,568 | 12,313 | 9,397 | 7,089 | 6,885 | ||||||||||
| Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net | 40,039 | 37,323 | 24,477 | 20,035 | 21,283 | ||||||||||
| Total Assets | 92,097 | 76,707 | 62,149 | 53,874 | 55,047 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | 6,184 | 3,946 | 3,090 | 2,945 | 2,702 | ||||||||||
| Capital Expenditures | 5,250 | 4,101 | 3,500 | 1,961 | 2,657 | ||||||||||
| Debt | 27,312 | 19,073 | 12,168 | 7,593 | 8,017 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders' Equity | 43,401 | 38,911 | 34,318 | 30,083 | 31,650 | ||||||||||
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview.We are a leading provider of accredited calibration, repair, inspection and compliancelaboratory instrument services and a value-added distributor of professional grade handheld test, measurement and control instrumentation.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments, Service and Distribution, which offer a comprehensive range of services and products to the same customer base.
Our strength in our Service segment is based upon theour wide range of disciplines, and theour investment in quality systems that are requiredand our ability to provide accredited calibrations to customers in ourhighly-regulated targeted market segments. Our services range from the calibration and repair of a single unit to managing a customer’s entire calibration program. We believe our Service segment offers an opportunity for long-term growth and the potential for continuing revenue from established customers with regular calibration cycles and recurring compliance serviceslaboratory instrument service requirements.
Our Service segment has shown consistent revenue growth over the past several years, ending fiscal year 2017 with its 32ndconsecutive quarter of year-over-year growth. This segment has benefited from both organic growth as well as the addition of acquired customers over those 32 quarters. In addition to acquiring customer bases, the business acquisitions that we made in fiscal years 2016 and 2017 and in years prior have been heavily focused on expanding our service capabilities, increasing our geographic reach and leveraging our Calibration Service Centers and other infrastructure to create operational synergies. Our organic Service revenue growth was in the mid to high single-digits for fiscal year 2017, allowing for 50 basis points of gross margin growth in this segment due to the relatively fixed cost structure of this segment. While positive, gross margin growth was somewhat muted in the Service segment in fiscal year 2017 due to additional expenses incurred from recent business acquisitions. Our Service segment ended fiscal year 2017 with a strong new business pipeline and a substantial backlog of work-in-process, showing the anticipated continued trend of revenue growth in this segment.
In our Distribution segment, our Master Catalog is widely recognized by both original equipment manufacturerswe sell and customers as the ultimate sourceoffer for rent, professional grade handheld test and measurement instruments. Additionally, becauseBecause we specialize in professional grade handheld test and measurement instruments, as opposed to a wide array of industrial products, our sales and customer service personnel can provide value-added technical assistance to our customers to aid them in determining what product best meets their particular application requirements.
Sales in our Distribution segment are generally not consumable items but are instruments purchased as replacements, upgrades or for expansion of manufacturing or research and development facilities. As such, this segment can be heavily impacted by changes in the economic environment. As customers increase or decrease capital and discretionary spending, our Distribution sales will typically be directly impacted. The majority ofThis was evidenced in fiscal year 2016, when our products are not consumables, but are purchased as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturingsales to the oil and research and development facilities. Year-over-year sales growthgas sector decreased concurrent with the overall contraction experienced in any one quarter can bethat sector. This segment was also negatively impacted in fiscal year 2016 by a strong U.S. dollar and general retraction of U.S. industrial output. In fiscal year 2017, our Distribution segment showed improved performance over the prior year as we implemented initiatives to expand and diversify our offerings in this segment. The initiatives implemented in fiscal year 2017 include adding new in-demand vendors and product lines, expanding the number of factors includingSKU’s that we offer with and without pre-shipment calibration and offering equipment rental and used equipment options.Management believes this diversification strategy will mitigate the additionimpact that any particular industry or sector will have on the overall performance of new product offerings or channels of distribution.
Financial Overview.In evaluating our results for fiscal year 2014, the following factors2017, investors should be taken into account:consider that fiscal year 2017 operating results include those of acquired businesses from their respective dates of acquisition through March 25, 2017.
Total revenue for fiscal year 20142017 was $118.5$143.9 million, a 5.5% increase17.8% improvement compared with total revenue of $112.3$122.2 million for fiscal year 2013. 2016.
Service revenue increased 18.5%20.1% to $48.2$71.1 million, or 40.7%49.4% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2014.2017. Of our Service revenue in fiscal year 2014, 83.0%2017, 84.4% was generated by our Calibration Service Centers of Excellence while 14.9%13.8% was generated through subcontracted third partythird-party vendors, compared with 82.1.%82.5% and 15.5%15.7%, respectively, in fiscal year 2013.2016. The balanceremainder of Serviceour service revenue in each period was associated with otherderived from freight charges.
Distribution sales decreased 1.8%increased 15.6% to $70.3$72.8 million, or 59.3%50.6% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2014.2017. Sales to domestic customers comprised 91.0%92.0% of total Distribution sales in fiscal year 2014,2017, while 6.0%5.9% were to Canadian customers and 3.0%2.1% were to customers in other international markets.
Gross margin for fiscal year 20142017 was 25.1%24.3%, a 7050 basis point increaseimprovement compared with gross margin of 24.4%23.8% in fiscal year 2013.2016. Service gross margin increased to 26.6%was 26.8% in fiscal year 20142017 compared with 25.3%26.3% in fiscal year 2013, while2016. Distribution gross margin increased to 24.1%was 21.9% in fiscal year 20142017 compared with 23.9%21.5% in fiscal year 2013.
Operating expenses were $23.1$27.0 million, or 19.4%18.8% of total revenue, in fiscal year 20142017 compared with $21.5$22.8 million, or 19.1%18.6% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2013.2016. Operating income was $6.7$7.9 million in fiscal year 20142017 compared with $5.9$6.3 million in fiscal year 2013.
Net income for fiscal year 2017 was $4.5 million, a $0.4 million improvement over fiscal year 2016. Diluted earnings per share improved $0.06 in fiscal year 2017 compared with fiscal year 2016, to $0.64 per diluted share.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Use of Estimates.The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, inventory reserves, probabilityestimated levels of achievement for performance-based restricted stock units, fair value of stock options, depreciable lives of fixed assets, and estimated lives of our major catalogs and intangible assets.assets, and the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business acquisitions. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, our accounting estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as our operating environment changes. Our estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are drawn from historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following items in our Consolidated Financial Statements require significant estimation or judgment.
Accounts Receivable.Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of revenues and/or the historical rate of returns. Management believes that the allowances are appropriate to cover anticipated losses under current conditions. However, unexpected changes or deterioration in economic conditions could materially change these expectations.
Inventory.Inventory consists of products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories of our inventory. Inventory is at risk of obsolescence if economic conditions change. Relevant economic conditions include changing consumer demand, customer preferences or increasing competition. We believe these risks are largely mitigated because our inventory typically turns several times per year. We evaluate the adequacy of the reserve on a quarterly basis.
Business Acquisitions.PropertyWe apply the acquisition method of accounting for business acquisitions. Under the acquisition method, the underlying tangible and Equipment, Depreciationintangible assets acquired and Amortization. Propertyliabilities assumed are recorded based on their respective assigned fair values at the date of acquisition. We use a valuation hierarchy to determine the fair values used. Purchase price allocations are subject to revision within the measurement period, not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition. Administration costs to acquire a business may include, but are not limited to, fees for accounting, legal and equipmentvaluation services and are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily under the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Goodwill and Intangible Assets.Goodwill represents costs inthe excess of fairthe purchase price over the values assigned to the underlying net assets of an acquired business. business and is not amortized. As of March 25, 2017, we had $32.5 million of recorded goodwill, including $3.5 million from the acquisition of Excalibur.
Other intangible assets, namely customer base and covenants not to compete, represent an allocation of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of an acquired business. These intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using the fair market value measurement requirement.
We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could exist. We have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a segment has declined below its carrying value. This assessment considers various financial, macroeconomic, industry and segment specific qualitative factors.
Other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. WeBased on the results of our reviews, we have determined that no impairment was indicated as of March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013.
26, 2016.
Income Taxes.Catalog Costs. We capitalize the cost of each Master Catalog mailedbase our deferred income taxes, accrued income taxes and amortize the cost over the respective catalog’s estimated productive life. We review response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis; and if warranted, modify the period over which costs are recognized. We amortize the cost of each Master Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortize the cost of each catalog supplement over a three month period.
We apply a more-likely-than-not threshold to the recognition and derecognition of uncertain tax positions. Accordingly, we recognize the amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being ultimately realized upon settlement. Future changes in judgments and estimates related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions will affect income in the quarter of such change. While it is moreoften difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our unrecognized tax benefits reflect the most likely than not that the benefit of such items will not be realized based on an assessment of both positive and negative evidence. See “Taxes” below and Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
Stock-Based Compensation.We measure the cost of services received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including stock options and restricted stock units, based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. We record compensation cost related to unvested equity awards by recognizing, on a straight line basis, the unamortized grant date fair value over the remaining service period of each award. ExcessThe Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-09 to simplify certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions to employees. We elected to early adopt this ASU in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017. Upon adoption, excess tax benefits for share based award activity are reflected in the statement of income as a component of the provision for income taxes. In fiscal year 2016, these excess tax benefits from the exercise of equity awards arewere recognized as a component of equity and were presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. We did not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our historical experience.
We grant performance-based restricted stock units as a primary component of executive compensation. The units generally vest following the third fiscal year from the date of grant subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible period. Compensation cost ultimately recognized for these performance-based restricted stock units will equal the grant-date fair market value of the unit that coincides with the actual outcome of the performance conditions. On an interim basis, we record compensation cost based on an assessmentthe expected level of achievement of the probability of achieving the performance conditions.
Stock options generally vest over a period of up to four years, using either a graded schedule or on a straight-line basis, and expire up to ten years from the date of grant. The expense relating to options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
See Note 6 ofto our Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure regarding our stock-based compensation.
Post-retirement Health Care Plans.Revenue Recognition. Distribution sales are recorded when an order’s titleThe Company has a defined benefit post-retirement health care plan which provides long-term care insurance benefits, medical and riskdental insurance benefits and medical premium reimbursement benefits to eligible retired corporate officers and their eligible spouses.
For accounting purposes, the defined benefit post-retirement health care plan requires assumptions to estimate the projected and accumulated benefit obligations, including the following variables: discount rate; certain employee-related factors, such as retirement age and mortality; and health care cost trend rates. These and other assumptions affect the annual expense and obligations recognized for the underlying plans. Our assumptions reflect our historical experiences and management's best judgment regarding future expectations.
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic post-retirement benefit cost by $0.1 million. A one percentage point decrease in the healthcare cost trend would decrease the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic post-retirement benefit cost by $0.1 million.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In the normal course of loss transfersbusiness, management evaluates all new accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB to determine the potential impact they may have on our consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of the newly issued accounting pronouncements see “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements” under Note 1 to the customer. We recognize the majorityConsolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of our Service revenue based upon when the calibration or other activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. SomePart II of our Service revenue is generated from managing customers’ calibration programs in which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. We generally invoice our customers for freight, shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the related revenues are recorded based upon historical data.this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
The following table sets forth, for fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, the components of our Consolidated Statements of Income.
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||
| As a Percentage of Total Revenue: | |||
| Service Revenue | 49.4% | 48.5% | |
| Distribution Sales | 50.6% | 51.5% | |
| Total Revenue | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Gross Profit Percentage: | |||
| Service Gross Profit | 26.8% | 26.3% | |
| Distribution Gross Profit | 21.9% | 21.5% | |
| Total Gross Profit | 24.3% | 23.8% | |
| Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses | 11.5% | 11.1% | |
| General and Administrative Expenses | 7.3% | 7.5% | |
| Total Operating Expenses | 18.8% | 18.6% | |
| Operating Income | 5.5% | 5.2% | |
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 0.5% | 0.3% | |
| Income Before Income Taxes | 5.0% | 4.9% | |
| Provision for Income Taxes | 1.9% | 1.5% | |
| Net Income | 3.1% | 3.4% | |
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Gross Profit Percentage: | ||||||||
| Distribution Gross Profit | 24.1 | % | 23.9 | % | ||||
| Service Gross Profit | 26.6 | % | 25.3 | % | ||||
| Total Gross Profit | 25.1 | % | 24.4 | % | ||||
| As a Percentage of Total Revenue: | ||||||||
| Distribution Sales | 59.3 | % | 63.8 | % | ||||
| Service Revenue | 40.7 | % | 36.2 | % | ||||
| Total Revenue | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
| Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses | 11.8 | % | 11.6 | % | ||||
| Administrative Expenses | 7.6 | % | 7.5 | % | ||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 19.4 | % | 19.1 | % | ||||
| Operating Income | 5.7 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 5.5 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2.1 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||
| Net Income | 3.4 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 29, 201425, 2017 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 30, 201326, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Revenue:
| For the Years Ended | |||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | Change | |||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | ||||||||
| Revenue: | |||||||||||
| Service | $ | 71,103 | $ | 59,202 | $ | 11,901 | 20.1% | ||||
| Distribution | 72,795 | 62,964 | 9,831 | 15.6% | |||||||
| Total | $ | 143,898 | $ | 122,166 | $ | 21,732 | 17.8% | ||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| March 29, | March 30, | Change | ||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
| Distribution | $ | 70,324 | $ | 71,641 | $ | (1,317 | ) | (1.8 | %) | |||||||
| Service | 48,184 | 40,655 | 7,529 | 18.5 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 118,508 | $ | 112,296 | $ | 6,212 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||
Total revenue increased $6.2$21.7 million, or 5.5%17.8%, from fiscal year 20132016 to fiscal year 2014.
Service revenue, which accounted for 40.7%49.4% and 36.2%48.5% of our total revenue in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, increased 18.5%20.1% from fiscal year 20132016 to fiscal year 2014.2017. This increase was due tothe result of business acquisitions andcombined with mid to high single-digit organic growth. Organic revenue growth was experienced across all thevarious key industries that we serve and was driven by strong retention of existing customers as well as the expansion of our customer base resulting fromthrough business development activities.
Our fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 Service revenue growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, werewas as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Service Revenue Growth | 11.2% | 25.4% | 19.4% | 26.9% | 21.4% | 10.5% | 12.7% | 11.5% | |||||||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service Revenue Growth | 10.3 | % | 16.5 | % | 16.6 | % | 34.4 | % | 14.1 | % | 8.9 | % | 19.8 | % | 3.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Within any year, while we add new customers, we also have customers from the prior year whose service orders may not repeat for any number of factors. Among those factors are variations in the timing of periodic calibrations and other services, customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing decisions. Because the timing of Service segment orders can vary on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we believe a trailing twelve monthtwelve-month trend provides a better indication of the progress of this segment. The following table presents the trailing twelve-month Service segment revenue for the trailing twelve months for each quarter in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013:
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service Revenue for | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trailing Twelve Months | $ | 48,184 | $ | 46,926 | $ | 45,294 | $ | 43,662 | $ | 40,655 | $ | 39,147 | $ | 38,341 | $ | 36,715 | |||||||||||||||||
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Trailing Twelve-Month: | |||||||||||||||||
| Service Revenue | $71,103 | $69,132 | $65,599 | $62,842 | $59,202 | $56,112 | $54,793 | $53,198 | |||||||||
| Service Revenue Growth | 20.1% | 23.2% | 19.7% | 18.1% | 14.3% | 10.5% | 10.2% | 9.5% | |||||||||
Our strategy has been to focus our investments in the core electrical, temperature, pressure, physical/dimensional and dimensionalradio frequency/microwave calibration disciplines. Accordingly, over the long-term, weWe expect to outsourcesubcontract approximately 13% to 15% to 20% of our Service revenue to third partythird-party vendors for calibration beyond our chosen scope of capabilities. During any individual quarter, we could fluctuate beyond these percentages. We continually evaluate our outsourcing needs and make capital investments, as deemed necessary, to add more in-house capabilities and reduce the need for third partythird-party vendors. Capability expansion through business acquisitions is another way that we seek to reduce the need for outsourcing. The following table presents the source of our Service revenue and the percentage of Service revenue derived from each source for each quarter during fiscal years 20142017 and 2013:
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent of Service Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depot/Onsite | 83.4 | % | 82.7 | % | 81.9 | % | 83.7 | % | 83.7 | % | 82.3 | % | 82.6 | % | 79.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Outsourced | 14.5 | % | 15.3 | % | 15.9 | % | 14.2 | % | 14.1 | % | 15.3 | % | 14.9 | % | 18.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Freight Billed to Customers | 2.1 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.2 | % | 2.1 | % | 2.2 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Percent of Service Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-House | 85.1% | 84.3% | 83.6% | 84.3% | 84.1% | 81.5% | 81.4% | 82.4% | |||||||||
| Outsourced | 13.0% | 13.9% | 14.6% | 13.8% | 14.0% | 16.9% | 16.7% | 15.8% | |||||||||
| Freight Billed to Customers | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.8% | |||||||||
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||||
Our Distribution sales accounted for 59.3%50.6% and 63.8%51.5% of our total revenue in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Year-over-year, Distribution sales decreased $1.3increased $9.8 million, or 1.8%15.6%. This declineThe year-over-year improvement was driven by strong growth from our traditional core end-user customers, primarily due to reduced sales tothose in the challenged windalternative energy industry.and U.S. industrial markets, the used equipment business acquired from Excalibur and the organic and acquired growth of our rental business. Our fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 Distribution sales (decline) growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons were as follows:
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Sales (Decline) Growth | (10.3 | %) | (2.3 | %) | 2.7 | % | 3.7 | % | (5.9 | %) | 0.3 | % | (0.1 | %) | (4.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Distribution Sales (Decline) Growth | 23.7% | 25.4% | 14.7% | (1.0%) | (14.4%) | (12.0%) | (17.4%) | (5.0%) | |||||||||
Distribution sales per business day decreased slightly to $280 thousand in fiscal year 2014, compared with $287 thousand in fiscal year 2013. Our Distribution sales per business day for each fiscal quarter during the fiscal years 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Sales Per Business Day | $ | 265 | $ | 311 | $ | 281 | $ | 265 | $ | 300 | $ | 319 | $ | 269 | $ | 260 | |||||||||||||||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Pending Product Shipments | $ | 2,455 | $ | 2,861 | $ | 3,438 | $ | 3,433 | $ | 2,968 | $ | 2,826 | $ | 2,365 | $ | 2,806 | |||||||||||||||||
| % of Pending Product Shipments that are Backorders | 69.1 | % | 71.2 | % | 63.8 | % | 68.7 | % | 71.9 | % | 69.6 | % | 68.6 | % | 68.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Total Pending Product Shipments | $3,662 | $3,989 | $3,530 | $3,469 | $2,966 | $3,421 | $3,124 | $2,858 | |||||||||
| % of Pending Product Shipments that were Backorders | 73.5% | 66.1% | 74.9% | 69.8% | 80.3% | 73.8% | 78.4% | 75.8% | |||||||||
Gross Profit:
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| March 29, | March 30, | Change | ||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Gross Profit | ||||||||||||||||
| Service | $ | 12,825 | $ | 10,302 | $ | 2,523 | 24.5 | % | ||||||||
| Distribution | 16,965 | 17,102 | (137 | ) | (0.8 | %) | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 29,790 | $ | 27,404 | $ | 2,386 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||
| For the Years Ended | |||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | Change | |||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | ||||||||
| Gross Profit: | |||||||||||
| Service | $ | 19,039 | $ | 15,585 | $ | 3,454 | 22.2% | ||||
| Distribution | 15,931 | 13,534 | 2,397 | 17.7% | |||||||
| Total | $ | 34,970 | $ | 29,119 | $ | 5,851 | 20.1% | ||||
Total gross profit in fiscal year 2014 increased by $2.42017 was $35.0 million, an increase of $5.9 million or 8.7%,20.1% from fiscal year 2013.2016. As a percentage of total revenue, total gross margin increased 70improved 50 basis points over the same time period.
Service gross profit increased $2.5$3.5 million, or 24.5%22.2%, from fiscal year 20132016 to fiscal year 2014. Service gross margin increased 130 basis points from fiscal year 2013 to fiscal year 2014, primarily due to increased revenue combined with continued cost control.2017. Our annual and quarterly Service segment gross margins are a function of several factors. Our organic Service revenue growth provides some incremental gross margin growth by leveraging the relativelycertain fixed cost structurecosts of this segment. Service segment revenue growth from our recent business acquisitions, while providing a base for future organic revenue growth, may moderate or reduce our gross margins as we acquire additional fixed costs.costs, especially in the short-term. The mix of services provided to customers may also affect gross margins in any given period. Annual Service gross margin improved 50 basis points from fiscal year 2016 to fiscal year 2017, reflecting the combined impact of strong organic Service revenue growth and an improved mix of services sold. The following table presents the quarterly historical trend of our Service gross margin as a percent of Service revenue:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Service Gross Margin | 30.0% | 24.7% | 24.4% | 27.5% | 30.3% | 23.5% | 24.4% | 26.1% | |||||||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service Gross Margin | 31.4 | % | 23.4 | % | 23.6 | % | 27.2 | % | 31.3 | % | 21.5 | % | 23.9 | % | 22.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Our Distribution gross profit from two perspectives. Channel gross profitmargin includes net sales less the direct cost of inventory sold. Our Distribution gross profit includes channel gross profitsold and the direct costs of equipment rental revenues, primarily depreciation expense for the fixed assets in our rental equipment pool, as well as the impact of vendor rebates and cooperative advertising income we receive from vendors, freight billed to customers, freight expenses and direct shipping costs. In general, our Distribution gross margin can vary based upon the mix of products sold, price discounting, and the timing of periodic vendor rebates offered and cooperative advertising income receivedprograms from suppliers.
The following table presentsreflects the quarterly historical trend of our Distribution gross profitmargin as a percent of Distribution sales:
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Channel Gross Margin (1) | 20.4 | % | 19.7 | % | 20.2 | % | 20.5 | % | 20.8 | % | 21.2 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Distribution Gross Margin (2) | 25.9 | % | 23.4 | % | 23.6 | % | 23.7 | % | 24.7 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.0 | % | 25.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| March 29, | March 30, | Change | ||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| Selling, Marketing and Warehouse | $ | 14,039 | $ | 13,001 | $ | 1,038 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
| Administrative | 9,046 | 8,457 | 589 | 7.0 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 23,085 | $ | 21,458 | $ | 1,627 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||
| Total Distribution Gross Margin | 20.7% | 22.6% | 22.2% | 22.0% | 21.0% | 21.6% | 21.4% | 21.9% | |||||||||
Annual Distribution segment gross margin improved 40 basis points in fiscal year 2017 compared to fiscal year 2016. Improvements in gross margin were driven by increased sales in our higher-margin equipment rental business (including that of Excalibur), the used equipment business acquired from Excalibur, increased vendor rebates and an improved customer mix, which for us means a higher percentage of total sales to end user customers and reduction in sales to wholesale or intermediary reseller type customers.
| Operating Expenses: | |||||||||||
| For the Years Ended | |||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | Change | |||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | ||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | |||||||||||
| Selling, Marketing and Warehouse | $ | 16,554 | $ | 13,625 | $ | 2,929 | 21.5% | ||||
| General and Administrative | 10,482 | 9,192 | 1,290 | 14.0% | |||||||
| Total | $ | 27,036 | $ | 22,817 | $ | 4,219 | 18.5% | ||||
Operating expenses increased $1.6$4.2 million, or 7.6%18.5%, from fiscal year 20132016 to fiscal year 2014.2017. As a percentage of total revenue, operating expenses increased from 19.1%18.6% in fiscal year 20132016 to 19.4%18.7% in fiscal year 2014, reflecting2017. The year-over-year increase in marketing and warehouse expenses was associated with increased selling and marketing expenses from our recent business development investments to drive organic growth within our Service segmentacquisitions, including intangible amortization. The total number of employees included in operating expense categories was 145 and increased performance based compensation.
Income Taxes:
| For the Years Ended | |||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | Change | |||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | ||||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | $ | 2,642 | $ | 1,883 | $ | 759 | 40.3% | ||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| March 29, | March 30, | Change | ||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | $ | 2,462 | $ | 2,014 | $ | 448 | 22.2 | % | ||||||||
Our effective tax rates for fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 were 38.2%36.9% and 35.2%31.3%, respectively. The increase largely reflects a changethe impact of changes in the mixavailability of taxableU.S. federal and state research and development tax credits. During fiscal year 2016, we recognized the cumulative impact of U.S. federal and state research and development tax credits that were identified for prior open years, including fiscal year 2016, causing our effective tax rate to be lower than our typical effective rate. We expect our future effective tax rate to be approximately 34.0% to 36.0%, with certain tax credits still being recognized but to a lesser extent than in fiscal year 2016.
Net Income:
| For the Years Ended | |||||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | Change | |||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | $ | % | ||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | $ | 398 | 9.7% | ||||
Improved gross profit more than offset increases in operating expenses, resulting in a 9.7% improvement in net income during fiscal year 2017 when compared to fiscal year 2016. As a percentage of revenue, net income was 3.1% in fiscal year 2017, down from 3.4% in fiscal year 2016. This year-over-year change reflects higher operating income, as a percentage of revenue, being more than offset by higher interest and income tax expenses.
Adjusted EBITDA:
In addition to reporting net income, a U.S. GAAP measure, we present Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and non-cash stock compensation expense), which is a non-GAAP measure. Our management believes Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure of our operating performance because it allows management, investors and others to evaluate and compare the performance of our core operations from period to period by removing the impact of the capital structure (interest), tangible and intangible asset base (depreciation and amortization), taxes, and stock-based compensation expense, which is not always commensurate with the reporting period in which it is included. As such, our management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of performance when evaluating our business segments and as a basis for planning and forecasting. Adjusted EBITDA is also commonly used by rating agencies, lenders and other parties to evaluate our credit worthiness.
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and is not calculated through the application of GAAP. As such, it should not be considered as a substitute or alternative for the GAAP measure of net income and, therefore, should not be used in isolation of, but in conjunction with, the GAAP measure. Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may produce results that vary from the GAAP measure and may not be comparable to a similarly defined non-GAAP measure used by other companies.
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | ||||
| + Interest Expense | 719 | 247 | ||||||
| + Other Expense / (Income) | 51 | 48 | ||||||
| + Tax Provision | 2,642 | 1,883 | ||||||
| Operating Income | $ | 7,934 | $ | 6,302 | ||||
| + Depreciation & Amortization | 6,184 | 3,946 | ||||||
| + Other (Expense) / Income | (51 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||
| + Noncash Stock Compensation | 453 | 359 | ||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 14,520 | $ | 10,559 | ||||
As a percentage of revenue, Adjusted EBITDA was 10.1% for fiscal year 2017 and 8.6% for fiscal year 2016. During fiscal year 2017, Adjusted EBITDA increased $4.0 million compared to fiscal year 2016. The difference between the U.S.increase in Adjusted EBITDA and Canada.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Through our credit agreement, as amended, (the “Credit Agreement”), which matures inon September 2015,20, 2018, we have a revolving credit facility in the amount of $20.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility allows for maximum borrowings of $30.0 million and limits the amount of borrowings that may be used for business acquisitions.
The Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a maximum borrowing restriction based on a 3.00 multiple of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters. As of March 29, 2014, $7.625, 2017, $30.0 million was outstandingavailable under the Revolving Credit Facility, of which $11.4 million was unused and included in long-termavailable to be borrowed. As of March 25, 2017, our total debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Credit Agreement has certain covenants with which we have to comply, including a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant and a leverage ratio covenant. On October 4, 2013, we repurchased 0.7 million shares of our common stock for $5.6 million. This repurchase was funded by a borrowing from our Revolving Credit Facility. In conjunction with this borrowing, we obtained from our bank a letter allowing the repurchase to be excluded from certain financial covenant provisions under the Credit Agreement. As a result, weWe were in compliance with all loan covenants and requirements during fiscal year 2017, and we expect to remain in compliance with all covenants throughout fiscal year 2014.
During fiscal year 2016, we entered into Amendment 3 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment 3”). Amendment 3 set the limit of borrowings that may be used for business acquisitions at $20.0 million for fiscal year 2017 and $15.0 million for each fiscal year thereafter. Amendment 3 also provided us with a $10.0 million term loan. The term loan requires principal repayments of $0.1 million per month plus interest in fiscal years 2017 through 2021 and a $3.0 million repayment required in fiscal year 2022. Amendment 3 also increased the allowable leverage ratio to a maximum of 3.0 from 2.75.
Cash Flows. Flows:The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (dollars in thousands):
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Cash Provided by (Used in): | ||||||||
| Operating Activities | $ | 7,544 | $ | 10,982 | ||||
| Investing Activities | (12,168 | ) | (17,964 | ) | ||||
| Financing Activities | 4,768 | 7,225 | ||||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| March 29, | March 30, | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Cash Provided by (Used in): | ||||||||
| Operating Activities | $ | 7,612 | $ | 5,241 | ||||
| Investing Activities | (1,712 | ) | (9,686 | ) | ||||
| Financing Activities | (6,588 | ) | 4,772 | |||||
Operating Activities: CashNet cash provided by operating activities foroperations was $7.5 million during fiscal year 2014 was $7.6 million2017 compared to $5.2$11.0 million induring fiscal year 2013. Significant2016.
The year-over-year decrease in cash provided by operations is primarily the result of changes in net working capital fluctuations were(defined as follows:
Cash: Cash increased $0.2 million during fiscal year 2017. The increase was primarily due to the timing of payments towards our long-term debt. | |
| ● | Receivables: |
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
| Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months | $ | 28,684 | $ | 24,568 | ||
| Accounts Receivable, net | $ | 22,049 | $ | 17,080 | ||
| Days Sales Outstanding | 46 | 42 | ||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||||
| Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months | $ | 22,831 | $ | 22,984 | ||||||
| Accounts Receivable, net | $ | 15,663 | $ | 15,411 | ||||||
| Days Sales Outstanding | 41 | 40 | ||||||||
| |
| ● | Accounts Payable: In general, |
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities: Accrued | |
| ● | Income Taxes Payable: In any given period, net working capital may be |
Investing Activities:During fiscal year 2014,2017, we invested $2.0$5.3 million in capital expenditures, compared with $2.7including $1.7 million spent for expanded Service segment capabilities and $2.4 million spent for rental assets. In fiscal year 2016 we invested $4.1 million in fiscal year 2013,capital expenditures, primarily onfor additional Service segment capabilities and development of customer facing software. In addition, during fiscal year 2014, we received $0.2 million from the sale of property and equipment. information technology improvements.
During fiscal year 2013,2017, we investedused $7.0 million for a business acquisition, compared to $13.9 million for three business acquisitions in business acquisitions.
Financing Activities: Activities:During fiscal year 2014,2017, we received $10.0 million in proceeds from a term loan (used primarily for the Excalibur acquisition), and used $6.6approximately $0.5 million in cash for repayment of our Revolving Credit Facility, $1.3 million in cash for repayment of our term loan and $3.0 million for financing activities, including $6.5the payment of contingent consideration and other hold back amounts related to previous business acquisitions. In addition, approximately $1.0 million in cash was used to repurchase sharesredeem stock options, as provided for in our 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, and $0.6 million in cash was generated from the issuance of common stock. During fiscal year 2013, we received $4.82016, approximately $6.9 million in net cash proceeds were provided by our Revolving Credit Facility, primarily to fund business acquisitions, and $0.5 million in cash from financing activities, including $4.7 million from our revolving line of credit and $0.1 millionwas generated from the net issuance of common stock.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments.Commitments:The table below contains aggregated information about future payments related to contractual obligations and commercial commitments such as debt and lease agreements as of March 25, 2017 (in millions):
| Payments Due By Period | |||||||||||||||
| Less Than | 1-3 | 3-5 | More Than | ||||||||||||
| 1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years | Total | |||||||||||
| Revolving Line of Credit (1) | $ | - | $ | 18.6 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 18.6 | |||||
| Term Loan | 1.4 | 4.3 | 3.0 | - | 8.7 | ||||||||||
| Operating Leases | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 5.9 | ||||||||||
| Total Contractual Cash Obligations | $ | 3.6 | $ | 24.5 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 33.2 | |||||
| Payments Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | More Than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Revolving Line of Credit (1) | $ | - | $ | 7.6 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 7.6 | ||||||||||
| Operating Leases | 1.6 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 6.5 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Contractual Cash Obligations | $ | 1.6 | $ | 10.1 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 14.1 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Due to the uncertainty of forecasting expected variable rate interest payments, this amount excludes the interest portion of our debt obligation. |
OUTLOOK
We entered fiscal year 2014 revenue2018 with excellent momentum and gross margin continued to expandhigh expectations. During the past year, we made important, strategic investments in physical assets, as a result of the strong execution of our strategic operating plan. We expect to continue to grow our Service segment revenue at a double digit rate, driven by our expanded addressable market and strong organic sales growth.
Our Service segment will continue to be our primary growth focus, and we expect double-digit revenue growth in this segment that will come from a blend of organic and acquisitive growth. We will also look for sales and cost synergies from all of our recent acquisitions to drive operating margin leverage.
We have also seen improvements in our Distribution segment and believe we are in a unique position with an expanded rental business and a used equipment business. Our initiatives to diversify and differentiate our customer value proposition are resonating in the market.
Fiscal year 2018 will be a year of continued emphasis on improving “Operational Excellence,” an initiative that we believe will improve customer experiences, expand organic growth potential, and strengthen our acquisition integration process, allowing us to capitalize on acquired synergies at a faster pace. We continually assess opportunities that can either enhance our capabilities and expertise, expand our geographic presence or are bolt-ons that can leverage our current infrastructure, and we will only proceed with opportunities that meet our strategic plan and pricing model.
Looking further ahead, we believe our capital and leadership investments have positioned us well to meet our goal of achieving $175 million to $200 million in revenue over the next three to four years.
Transcat expects its income tax rate to range between $3.034% and 36% in fiscal year 2018.
The Company anticipates total capital expenditures to be approximately $6.0 million and $3.5to $6.5 million onin fiscal year 2018, with the majority of the incremental capital expenditures in excess of fiscal year 20152017 amounts planned for IT infrastructure investments to support our online initiativesdrive operational excellence and to expandfor specific customer-opportunity driven Service segment capacity and capabilities.
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowing activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than $0.1approximately $0.2 million assuming our average borrowing levels remained constant. As of March 29, 2014, $20.025, 2017, $30.0 million was available under our credit facility,Revolving Credit Facility, of which $7.6$18.6 million was outstanding and included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
At our interest rate risk by electing tooption, we borrow from our credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility and term loan at the variable one-month LIBOR adjusting daily, or at a fixed rate for a designated period at the LIBOR corresponding to such period, in each case, plus a margin. Our interest rate margin is determined on a quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. As of March 29, 2014,25, 2017, the one-month LIBOR was 0.2%1.0%. Our interest rate for fiscal year 20142017 ranged from 1.1%1.3% to 1.7%3.0%. On March 29, 2014,25, 2017, we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward movements in interest rates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Approximately 90% of our total revenues for fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 were denominated in U.S. dollars, with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the value of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would impact our revenue by less than 1%. We monitor the relationship between the U.S. and Canadian currencies on a monthly basis and adjust sales prices for products and services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be appropriate.
We continually utilize short-term foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that future earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. We do not apply hedge accounting and therefore the net change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled a net gain of less than $0.1 million and a net gain of $0.4 million in fiscal year 2014years 2017 and a gain of less than $0.1 in fiscal year 2013,2016, respectively, was recognized as a component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On March 29, 2014,25, 2017, we had a foreign exchange contract, which matured in April 2014,2017, outstanding in the notional amount of $4.8$5.9 million. The foreign exchange contract was renewed in April 2017 and continues to be in place. We do not use hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 201326, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013,26, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the fiscal years then ended, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.
Rochester, New York
June
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
| For the Years Ended | ||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
| Service Revenue | $ | 71,103 | $ | 59,202 | ||
| Distribution Sales | 72,795 | 62,964 | ||||
| Total Revenue | 143,898 | 122,166 | ||||
| Cost of Services Sold | 52,064 | 43,617 | ||||
| Cost of Distribution Sales | 56,864 | 49,430 | ||||
| Total Cost of Revenue | 108,928 | 93,047 | ||||
| Gross Profit | 34,970 | 29,119 | ||||
| Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses | 16,554 | 13,625 | ||||
| General and Administrative Expenses | 10,482 | 9,192 | ||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 27,036 | 22,817 | ||||
| Operating Income | 7,934 | 6,302 | ||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 770 | 295 | ||||
| Income Before Provision for Income Taxes | 7,164 | 6,007 | ||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2,642 | 1,883 | ||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | ||
| Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.60 | ||
| Average Shares Outstanding | 6,994 | 6,887 | ||||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.58 | ||
| Average Shares Outstanding | 7,111 | 7,121 | ||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| Distribution Sales | $ | 70,324 | $ | 71,641 | ||||
| Service Revenue | 48,184 | 40,655 | ||||||
| Total Revenue | 118,508 | 112,296 | ||||||
| Cost of Distribution Sales | 53,359 | 54,539 | ||||||
| Cost of Services Sold | 35,359 | 30,353 | ||||||
| Total Cost of Revenue | 88,718 | 84,892 | ||||||
| Gross Profit | 29,790 | 27,404 | ||||||
| Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses | 14,039 | 13,001 | ||||||
| Administrative Expenses | 9,046 | 8,457 | ||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 23,085 | 21,458 | ||||||
| Operating Income | 6,705 | 5,946 | ||||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 259 | 228 | ||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 6,446 | 5,718 | ||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2,462 | 2,014 | ||||||
| Net Income | $ | 3,984 | $ | 3,704 | ||||
| Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.50 | ||||
| Average Shares Outstanding | 7,080 | 7,404 | ||||||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
| Average Shares Outstanding | 7,357 | 7,592 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(In Thousands)
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | ||||
| Other Comprehensive Loss Income: | ||||||||
| Currency Translation Adjustment | (41 | ) | (202 | ) | ||||
| Other, net of tax effects of $10 and $8 for the years ended March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively. | (15 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
| Total Other Comprehensive Loss | (56 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
| Comprehensive Income | $ | 4,466 | $ | 3,909 | ||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| Net Income | $ | 3,984 | $ | 3,704 | ||||
| Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): | ||||||||
| Currency Translation Adjustment | (6 | ) | 2 | |||||
| Unrecognized Prior Service Cost, net of tax | 64 | 1 | ||||||
| Unrealized Gain on Other Asset, net of tax | 28 | 30 | ||||||
| 86 | 33 | |||||||
| Comprehensive Income | $ | 4,070 | $ | 3,737 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current Assets: | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | 23 | $ | 406 | ||||
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $82 and $118 as of March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively | 15,663 | 15,411 | ||||||
| Other Receivables | 1,088 | 977 | ||||||
| Inventory, net | 6,181 | 6,803 | ||||||
| Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets | 1,180 | 1,134 | ||||||
| Deferred Tax Asset | 1,396 | 1,087 | ||||||
| Total Current Assets | 25,531 | 25,818 | ||||||
| Property and Equipment, net | 7,089 | 6,885 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 17,384 | 17,592 | ||||||
| Intangible Assets, net | 2,651 | 3,691 | ||||||
| Other Assets | 1,219 | 1,061 | ||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 53,874 | $ | 55,047 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
| Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts Payable | $ | 7,132 | $ | 8,883 | ||||
| Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities | 5,690 | 3,979 | ||||||
| Income Taxes Payable | 1,035 | 465 | ||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 13,857 | 13,327 | ||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 7,593 | 8,017 | ||||||
| Deferred Tax Liability | 607 | 551 | ||||||
| Other Liabilities | 1,734 | 1,502 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities | 23,791 | 23,397 | ||||||
| Shareholders' Equity: | ||||||||
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 6,716,350 and 7,423,507 shares issued and outstanding as of March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively | 3,358 | 3,712 | ||||||
| Capital in Excess of Par Value | 11,387 | 10,616 | ||||||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 567 | 481 | ||||||
| Retained Earnings | 14,771 | 16,841 | ||||||
| Total Shareholders' Equity | 30,083 | 31,650 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 53,874 | $ | 55,047 | ||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current Assets: | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | 842 | $ | 641 | ||||
| Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $210 and $113 as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively | 22,049 | 17,080 | ||||||
| Other Receivables | 1,227 | 881 | ||||||
| Inventory, net | 10,278 | 6,520 | ||||||
| Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets | 1,193 | 1,096 | ||||||
| Total Current Assets | 35,589 | 26,218 | ||||||
| Property and Equipment, net | 15,568 | 12,313 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 32,520 | 29,112 | ||||||
| Intangible Assets, net | 7,519 | 8,211 | ||||||
| Other Assets | 901 | 853 | ||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 92,097 | $ | 76,707 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
| Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts Payable | $ | 11,615 | $ | 8,141 | ||||
| Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities | 5,907 | 7,688 | ||||||
| Income Taxes Payable | 805 | - | ||||||
| Current Portion of Long-Term Debt | 1,429 | - | ||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 19,756 | 15,829 | ||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 25,883 | 19,073 | ||||||
| Deferred Tax Liabilities, net | 1,134 | 1,071 | ||||||
| Other Liabilities | 1,923 | 1,823 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities | 48,696 | 37,796 | ||||||
| Shareholders' Equity: | ||||||||
| Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 7,043,754 and 6,923,557 shares issued and outstanding as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively | 3,522 | 3,462 | ||||||
| Capital in Excess of Par Value | 12,996 | 12,993 | ||||||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | (414 | ) | (358 | ) | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 27,297 | 22,814 | ||||||
| Total Shareholders' Equity | 43,401 | 38,911 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 92,097 | $ | 76,707 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(In Thousands)
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 3,984 | $ | 3,704 | ||||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| Gain on Disposal of Property and Equipment | (34 | ) | - | |||||
| Deferred Income Taxes | (310 | ) | 43 | |||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | 2,945 | 2,702 | ||||||
| Provision for Accounts Receivable and Inventory Reserves | 1 | 162 | ||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation Expense | 527 | 343 | ||||||
| Changes in Assets and Liabilities, net of acquisitions: | ||||||||
| Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables | (424 | ) | (842 | ) | ||||
| Inventory | 681 | (294 | ) | |||||
| Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets | (623 | ) | (914 | ) | ||||
| Accounts Payable | (1,751 | ) | 1,389 | |||||
| Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities | 2,047 | (1,070 | ) | |||||
| Income Taxes Payable | 569 | 18 | ||||||
| Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 7,612 | 5,241 | ||||||
| Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of Property and Equipment | (1,961 | ) | (2,657 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from Sale of Property and Equipment | 249 | - | ||||||
| Business Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | - | (7,029 | ) | |||||
| Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (1,712 | ) | (9,686 | ) | ||||
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||
| (Repayment of) Proceeds from Revolving Line of Credit, net | (424 | ) | 4,652 | |||||
| Payment of Contingent Consideration | - | (72 | ) | |||||
| Issuance of Common Stock | 317 | 239 | ||||||
| Repurchase of Common Stock | (6,482 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||
| Excess Tax Benefits Related to Stock-Based Compensation | 1 | 63 | ||||||
| Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities | (6,588 | ) | 4,772 | |||||
| Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | 305 | 47 | ||||||
| Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash | (383 | ) | 374 | |||||
| Cash at Beginning of Fiscal Year | 406 | 32 | ||||||
| Cash at End of Fiscal Year | $ | 23 | $ | 406 | ||||
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity: | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the fiscal year for: | ||||||||
| Interest | $ | 121 | $ | 118 | ||||
| Income Taxes, net | $ | 2,189 | $ | 1,890 | ||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | ||||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash | ||||||||
Provided by Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| (Gain)/Loss on Disposal of Property and Equipment | (4 | ) | 38 | |||||
| Deferred Income Taxes | 63 | 136 | ||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization | 6,184 | 3,946 | ||||||
| Provision for Accounts Receivable and Inventory Reserves | 376 | 147 | ||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation Expense | 453 | 359 | ||||||
| Changes in Assets and Liabilities, net of acquisitions: | ||||||||
| Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables | (4,728 | ) | 998 | |||||
| Inventory | (3,425 | ) | 177 | |||||
| Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets | (224 | ) | 118 | |||||
| Accounts Payable | 3,107 | 446 | ||||||
| Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities | 405 | 22 | ||||||
| Income Taxes Payable | 815 | 471 | ||||||
| Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 7,544 | 10,982 | ||||||
| Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of Property and Equipment | (5,250 | ) | (4,101 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from Sale of Property and Equipment | 59 | 31 | ||||||
| Business Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (6,977 | ) | (13,894 | ) | ||||
| Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (12,168 | ) | (17,964 | ) | ||||
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||
| (Repayment of) Proceeds from Revolving Credit Facility, net | (452 | ) | 6,905 | |||||
| Proceeds from Term Loan | 10,000 | - | ||||||
| Repayments of Term Loan | (1,310 | ) | - | |||||
| Payment of Contingent Consideration and Holdbacks Related to Business Acquisitions | (3,041 | ) | - | |||||
| Issuance of Common Stock | 635 | 454 | ||||||
| Repurchase of Common Stock | (98 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||
| Stock Option Redemption | (966 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
| Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 4,768 | 7,225 | ||||||
| Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | 57 | 333 | ||||||
| Net Increase in Cash | 201 | 576 | ||||||
| Cash at Beginning of Fiscal Year | 641 | 65 | ||||||
| Cash at End of Fiscal Year | $ | 842 | $ | 641 | ||||
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity: | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the fiscal year for: | ||||||||
| Interest | $ | 686 | $ | 243 | ||||
| Income Taxes, net | $ | 1,835 | $ | 1,287 | ||||
| Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | ||||||||
| Contingent Consideration Related to Business Acquisition | $ | - | $ | 800 | ||||
| Holdback Amounts Related to Business Acquisitions | $ | 735 | $ | 1,588 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(In
| Capital | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | In | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Issued | Excess | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
| $0.50 Par Value | of Par | Comprehensive | Retained | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Value | Loss | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of March 28, 2015 | 6,836 | $ | 3,418 | $ | 12,289 | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 18,754 | $ | 34,318 | |||||||||||
| Issuance of Common Stock | 70 | 35 | 419 | - | - | 454 | |||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of Common Stock | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | - | (64 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 26 | 13 | 346 | - | - | 359 | |||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of Stock Options | - | - | (61 | ) | - | - | (61 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Tax Benefit from Stock- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Based Compensation | - | - | 5 | - | - | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other Comprehensive Loss | - | - | - | (215 | ) | - | (215 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | - | - | - | - | 4,124 | 4,124 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of March 26, 2016 | 6,924 | $ | 3,462 | $ | 12,993 | $ | (358 | ) | $ | 22,814 | $ | 38,911 | |||||||||||
| Issuance of Common Stock | 80 | 40 | 595 | - | - | 635 | |||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of Common Stock | (10 | ) | (5 | ) | (54 | ) | - | (39 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 50 | 25 | 428 | - | - | 453 | |||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of Stock Options | - | - | (966 | ) | - | - | (966 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Other Comprehensive Loss | - | - | - | (56 | ) | - | (56 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | - | - | - | - | 4,522 | 4,522 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of March 25, 2017 | 7,044 | $ | 3,522 | $ | 12,996 | $ | (414 | ) | $ | 27,297 | $ | 43,401 | |||||||||||
| Accum- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital | ulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | In | Other | Treasury Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issued | Excess | Compre- | Outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $0.50 Par Value | of Par | hensive | Retained | at Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Value | Income | Earnings | Shares | Amount | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of March 31, 2012 | 7,840 | $ | 3,920 | $ | 10,810 | $ | 448 | $ | 14,394 | 499 | $ | (2,194 | ) | $ | 27,378 | |||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of Common Stock | 46 | 23 | 216 | 239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retirement of Treasury Stock | (498 | ) | (249 | ) | (763 | ) | (1,182 | ) | (499 | ) | 2,194 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of Common Stock | (16 | ) | (8 | ) | (27 | ) | (75 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 52 | 26 | 317 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation | 63 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Comprehensive Gain | 33 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income | 3,704 | 3,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of March 30, 2013 | 7,424 | 3,712 | 10,616 | 481 | 16,841 | - | - | 31,650 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of Common Stock | 72 | 36 | 281 | 317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of Common Stock | (810 | ) | (405 | ) | (23 | ) | (6,054 | ) | (6,482 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 30 | 15 | 512 | 527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Comprehensive Gain | 86 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income | 3,984 | 3,984 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of March 29, 2014 | 6,716 | $ | 3,358 | $ | 11,387 | $ | 567 | $ | 14,771 | - | $ | - | $ | 30,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(In Thousands, Except Per Share and Per Unit Amounts)
NOTE 1 – GENERAL
Description of Business:Transcat, Inc. (“Transcat” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of accredited calibration repair, inspection and compliancelaboratory instrument services and a value-added distributor of professional grade handheld test, measurement and control instrumentation primarily forinstrumentation. The Company is focused on providing services and products to highly regulated industries, particularly the life science industry, which includes pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device pharmaceutical and other FDA-regulated businesses. Additional industries served include industrial manufacturing,manufacturing; energy and utilities, chemical manufacturing,including oil and gas and alternative energy; FAA-regulated businesses, including aerospace and defense; and other industries.industries that require accuracy in their processes, confirmation of the capabilities of their equipment, and for which the risk of failure is very costly.
Principles of Consolidation:The Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of Transcat include the accounts of Transcat Inc. and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Transmation (Canada)Transcat Canada Inc., United Scale & Engineering Corporation and WTT Real Estate Acquisition, LLC and Anacor Acquisition, LLC (“Anacor Acquisition”).Anmar Metrology, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates:The preparation of Transcat’s Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, inventory reserves, probabilityestimated levels of achievement for performance-based restricted stock units, fair value of stock options, depreciable lives of fixed assets, and estimated lives of major catalogs and intangible assets.assets, and the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business acquisitions. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, accounting estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal Year:Transcat operates on a 52/53 week fiscal year, ending the last Saturday in March. In a 52-week fiscal year, each of the four quarters is a 13-week period. In a 53-week fiscal year, the last quarter is a 14-week period. The fiscal years ended March 29, 201425, 2017 (“fiscal year 2014”2017”) and March 30, 201326, 2016 (“fiscal year 2013”2016”) consisted of 52 weeks.
Accounts Receivable:Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. Transcat applies a specific formula to its accounts receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of revenue and/or the historical rate of returns.
Inventory:Inventory consists of products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or market.market value. Costs are determined using the average cost method of inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories of inventory. The Company evaluates the adequacy of the reserve on a quarterly basis. At March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013,26, 2016, the Company had reserves for inventory losses totaling $0.4$0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
Property and Equipment, Depreciation and Amortization:Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily under the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
| Years | ||
| Machinery, Equipment and Software | 2 – 20 | |
| Rental Equipment | 5 – 8 | |
| Furniture and Fixtures | 3 – 10 | |
| Leasehold Improvements | 2 – 10 | |
| Buildings | 39 |
| Years | |||||
| Machinery, Equipment and Software | 2 | – | 15 | ||
| Furniture and Fixtures | 3 | – | 10 | ||
| Leasehold Improvements | 2 | – | 10 | ||
| Buildings | 39 | ||||
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written off at their then remaining net book value. Transcat capitalizes certain costs incurred in the procurement and development of computer software used for internal purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 for further information on property and equipment.
Business Acquisitions:The Company applies the acquisition method of accounting for business acquisitions. Under the acquisition method, the purchase price of an acquisition is assigned to the underlying tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company uses a valuation hierarchy, as further described under Fair Value of Financial Instruments below, and typically utilizes independent third-party valuation specialists to determine the fair values used in this allocation. Purchase price allocations are subject to revision within the measurement period, not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition. Costs to acquire a business may include, but are not limited to, fees for accounting, legal and valuation services, and are expensed as incurred in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets:Goodwill represents costs inthe excess of the purchase price over the fair values assigned toof the underlying net assets of an acquired business. Other intangible assets, namely customer base and covenants not to compete, represent an allocation of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of an acquired business. The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units using the fair market value measurement requirement.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could exist. Other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company determined that no impairment was indicated as of March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013.26, 2016. A summary of changes in the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets is as follows:
| Goodwill | Intangible Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution | Service | Total | Distribution | Service | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net Book Value as of March 28, 2015 | 8,031 | 12,892 | 20,923 | 203 | 3,351 | 3,554 | |||||||||||||||||
| Additions (see Note 9) | - | 8,421 | 8,421 | - | 6,127 | 6,127 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization | - | - | - | (79 | ) | (1,255 | ) | (1,334 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Currency Translation Adjustment | - | (232 | ) | (232 | ) | - | (136 | ) | (136 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net Book Value as of March 26, 2016 | $ | 8,031 | $ | 21,081 | $ | 29,112 | $ | 124 | $ | 8,087 | $ | 8,211 | |||||||||||
| Additions (see Note 9) | 1,728 | 1,733 | 3,461 | 1,045 | 1,045 | 2,090 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization | - | - | - | (413 | ) | (2,362 | ) | (2,775 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Currency Translation Adjustment | - | (53 | ) | (53 | ) | - | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net Book Value as of March 25, 2017 | $ | 9,759 | $ | 22,761 | $ | 32,520 | $ | 756 | $ | 6,763 | $ | 7,519 | |||||||||||
| Goodwill | Intangible Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution | Service | Total | Distribution | Service | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net Book Value as of March 31, 2012 | $ | 8,031 | $ | 5,359 | $ | 13,390 | $ | 724 | $ | 1,725 | $ | 2,449 | ||||||||||||
| Additions (see Note 9) | - | 4,234 | 4,234 | - | 2,062 | 2,062 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization | - | - | - | (239 | ) | (563 | ) | (802 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Currency Translation Adjustment | - | (32 | ) | (32 | ) | - | (18 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net Book Value as of March 30, 2013 | 8,031 | 9,561 | 17,592 | 485 | 3,206 | 3,691 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization | - | - | - | (167 | ) | (743 | ) | (910 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Currency Translation Adjustment | - | (208 | ) | (208 | ) | - | (130 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net Book Value as of March 29, 2014 | $ | 8,031 | $ | 9,353 | $ | 17,384 | $ | 318 | $ | 2,333 | $ | 2,651 | ||||||||||||
The intangible assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lifelives of up to 10 years. Amortization expense relating to intangible assets is expected to be $0.7$2.1 million in the fiscal year ending March 28, 2015 (“2018, $1.6 million in fiscal year 2015”),2019, $1.2 million in fiscal year 2020, $0.9 million in fiscal year 2021 and $0.6 million in fiscal year 2016, $0.5 million in fiscal year 2017, $0.3 million in fiscal year 2018 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2019.
Catalog Costs:Transcat capitalizes the cost of each Master Catalog mailed and amortizes the cost over the respective catalog’s estimated productive life. The Company reviews response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis, and if warranted, modifies the period over which costs are recognized. The Company amortizes the cost of each Master Catalog over an eighteeneighteen- month period and amortizes the cost of each catalog supplement over a three monththree-month period. Total unamortized catalog costs, included as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $0.3$0.1 million as of March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013.26, 2016.
Deferred Taxes:Transcat accounts for certain income and expense items differently for financial reporting purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. If necessary, a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided for items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such items will not be realized based on an assessment of both positive and negative evidence. See Note 4 for further discussion on income taxes.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:Transcat has determined the fair value of debt and other financial instruments using a valuation hierarchy. The hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value, consists of three levels. Level 1 uses observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2 uses inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, which is defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. The carrying amount of debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to variable interest rate pricing, and the carrying amounts for cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. Investment assets, which fund the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan, consist of mutual funds and are valued based on Level 1 inputs. At March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013,26, 2016, investment assets totaled $0.8$0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and are included as a component of other assets (non-current) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Stock-Based Compensation:The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including stock options and restricted stock units, based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. The Company records compensation cost related to unvested equity awards by recognizing, on a straight line basis, the unamortized grant date fair value over the remaining service period of each award. ExcessThe Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-09 to simplify certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions to employees. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017. Upon adoption, excess tax benefits for share based award activity are reflected in the statement of income as a component of the provision for income taxes. In fiscal year 2016, these excess tax benefits from the exercise of equity awards arewere recognized as a component of equity and were presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. The Company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. The Company estimates forfeiture rates based on its historical experience. During fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company recorded non-cash stock-based compensation cost in the amount of $0.5 million and $0.3$0.4 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Revenue Recognition:Distribution sales are recorded when an order’s title and risk of loss transfers to the customer. The Company recognizes the majority of its serviceService revenue based upon when the calibration or other activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. Some serviceService revenue is generated from managing customers’ calibration programs in which the Company recognizes revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. The Company generally invoices its customers for freight, shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the related revenue is recorded based upon historical data.
Vendor Rebates:Vendor rebates are generally based on specified cumulative levellevels of purchases and/or incremental distribution sales and are recorded as a reduction of cost of distribution sales. Purchase rebates are calculated and recorded quarterly based upon ourthe volume of purchases with specific vendors during the quarter. Point of sale rebate programs that are based upon annualon year-over-year sales performance on a calendar year basis and are recorded as earned, on a quarterly basis, based upon the expected level of annual achievement. Point of sale rebate programs that are based on year-over-year sales performance on a quarterly basis are recorded as earned in the respective quarter. The Company recorded vendor rebates of $2.1$1.5 million and $1.3$0.9 million in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013, respectively.2016, respectively as a reduction of cost of distribution sales.
Cooperative Advertising Income:Transcat records cash consideration received from a vendorvendors for advertising as a reduction of cost of distribution sales as the related inventory is sold.sales. The Company recorded consideration in the amount of $1.9$1.7 million and $1.8$2.0 million in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
Advertising Costs:Advertising costs, other than catalog costs, are expensed as they are incurred and are included in Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Advertising costs were approximately $1.2 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016.
Shipping and Handling Costs:Freight expense and direct shipping costs are included in the cost of revenue. These costs totaled approximately $2.2 million and $1.8 million in each of the fiscal years 20142017 and 2013.2016, respectively. Direct handling costs, the majority of which represent direct compensation of employees who pick, pack, and otherwise prepare if necessary, merchandise for shipment to customers, are reflected in selling, marketing and warehouse expenses. Direct handling costs were $0.8$0.9 million in each of the fiscal years ended March 29, 20142017 and March 30, 2013.2016.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions:The accounts of Transmation (Canada)Transcat Canada Inc. are maintained in the local currency and have been translated to U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities have been translated at the period-end rates of exchange, and related revenue and expense accounts have been translated at an average rate of exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising from translation of Transmation (Canada)Transcat Canada Inc.’s balance sheetsfinancial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded directly to the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component of shareholders’ equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian business transactions.transactions denominated in foreign currency. The net foreign currency loss was $0.1 million for fiscal year 2014 and less than $0.1 million forin each of the fiscal year 2013.years 2017 and 2016. The Company continually utilizes short-term foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that its earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The Company does not apply hedge accounting and therefore the net change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled a gain of $0.4 million in fiscal year 2014 and anet gain of less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2013,2017 and a net gain of $0.4 million in 2016, was recognized as a component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying accounts receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On March 29, 2014,25, 2017, the Company had a foreign exchange contract, which matured in April 2014,2017, outstanding in the notional amount of $4.8$5.9 million. This contract was subsequently renewed and remains in place. The Company does not use hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
Other Comprehensive Income: Other comprehensiveComprehensive income is comprisedcomposed of net income, currency translation adjustments, unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax, and unrealized gains or losses on other assets, net of tax. At March 29, 2014,25, 2017, accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of cumulative currency translation gainslosses of $0.6$0.3 million, unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax, of $0.1 million and an unrealized gain on other assets, net of tax, of less than $0.1 million. At March 30, 2013,26, 2016, accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of cumulative currency translation gainslosses of $0.6$0.3 million, unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax, of $0.2$0.1 million and an unrealized gain on other assets, net of tax, of less than $0.1 million.
Earnings Perper Share:Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of common stock reflect the assumed conversion of stock options and unvested restricted stock units using the treasury stock method in periods in which they have a dilutive effect. In computing the per share effect of assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from the exercise of options and unvested restricted stock units and the related tax benefits are considered to have been used to purchase shares of common stock at the average market prices during the period, and the resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in the calculation of average shares of common stock outstanding.
For fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, the net additional common stock equivalents had a $.02$0.01 and $.01$0.02 per share effect respectively, on the calculation of dilutive earnings per share.share, respectively. The average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
| For the Years Ended | ||||
| March 25, | March 26, | |||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
| Average Shares Outstanding – Basic | 6,994 | 6,887 | ||
| Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents | 117 | 234 | ||
| Average Shares Outstanding – Diluted | 7,111 | 7,121 | ||
| Anti-dilutive Common Stock Equivalents | - | 10 | ||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| Average Shares Outstanding – Basic | 7,080 | 7,404 | ||||||
| Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents | 277 | 188 | ||||||
| Average Shares Outstanding – Diluted | 7,357 | 7,592 | ||||||
| Anti-dilutive Common Stock Equivalents | 10 | 464 | ||||||
Shareholders’ Equity:During each of fiscal year 2014,years 2017 and 2016, the Company repurchased and subsequently retired 0.8less than 0.1 million shares of its common stock. The Company redeemed certain stock options pursuant to the shareholder-approved Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (the “2003 Plan”) for $1.0 million in fiscal year 2017 and $0.1 million in fiscal year 2016.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In March 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including 0.7 million shares purchased fromthe accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 is required for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017. Early adopting this ASU in an unaffiliated shareholderinterim period required that any adjustments be reflected as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017. This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805). This ASU provides guidance on whether a set of assets acquired is to be considered and accounted for as a business acquisition. This guidance requires that an entity evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired in a privately-negotiated transaction is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also requires at least one substantive process be acquired for $5.6 million.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350). This ASU simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in today’s two-step impairment test under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350. Under the new guidance, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This ASU simplifies today’s requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using a separately calculated implied fair value. This ASU is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted beginning January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07 to Topic 715, Compensation—Retirement Benefits. This ASU provides new guidance as part of FASB’s effort to improve employers’ financial reporting for defined benefit plans. This new guidance changes where on the income statement employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans present the net periodic benefit cost. Under the new guidance, employers will present the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item(s) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. Employers will present the other components separately from the line item(s) that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income, if one is presented. Employers will have to disclose the line(s) used to present the other components of net periodic benefit cost, if the components are not presented separately in the income statement. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassification of Amounts:Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consistconsists of:
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Machinery, Equipment and Software | $ | 32,733 | $ | 29,833 | ||||
| Rental Equipment | 4,461 | 1,243 | ||||||
| Furniture and Fixtures | 2,405 | 2,326 | ||||||
| Leasehold Improvements | 2,491 | 2,280 | ||||||
| Buildings and Land | 500 | 500 | ||||||
| Total Property and Equipment | 42,590 | 36,182 | ||||||
| Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | (27,022 | ) | (23,869 | ) | ||||
| Total Property and Equipment, net | $ | 15,568 | $ | 12,313 | ||||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| Machinery, Equipment and Software | $ | 23,226 | $ | 21,661 | ||||
| Furniture and Fixtures | 2,096 | 2,065 | ||||||
| Leasehold Improvements | 1,689 | 1,544 | ||||||
| Buildings and Land | 500 | 675 | ||||||
| Total Property and Equipment | 27,511 | 25,945 | ||||||
| Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | (20,422 | ) | (19,060 | ) | ||||
| Total Property and Equipment, net | $ | 7,089 | $ | 6,885 | ||||
Total depreciation and amortization expense relating to property and equipment amounted to $1.5$3.3 million and $2.3 million in fiscal year 2014years 2017 and $1.4 million in fiscal year 2013.
NOTE 3 – LONG-TERM DEBT
Description:Description. OnThe Company, through its credit agreement, as amended (the “Credit Agreement”), which matures September 20, 2012, Transcat entered into2018, has a credit agreement with Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (the “M&T Credit Agreement”). The M&T Credit Agreement provides for a three-year revolving credit facility in the amountthat allows for maximum borrowings of $20.0$30.0 million (the “M&T Revolving“Revolving Credit Facility”) and replaceda term loan. The Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a maximum borrowing restriction based on a 3.0 multiple of earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the credit agreement dated as of November 20, 2006, as amended, with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters. As of March 29, 2014, $7.625, 2017, $30.0 million was available under the Revolving Credit Facility, of which $18.6 million was outstanding under the M&T Revolving Credit Facility and is included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Amendment 3 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment 3”) set the limit of borrowings that may be used for business acquisitions at $20.0 million for fiscal year 2017 and $15.0 million for each fiscal year thereafter. During fiscal year 2017, the Company used $10.0 million of borrowings for business acquisitions and related payments.
Amendment 3 also provided the Company with a $10.0 million term loan. As of March 25, 2017, $8.7 million was outstanding on the term loan, of which $1.4 million was included in current liabilities with the remainder included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Interest and Other Costs. Costs:Interest on the M&T Revolving Credit Facility and term loan accrues, at Transcat’s election, at either the variable one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), adjusting daily, or a fixed rate for a designated period at the LIBOR corresponding to such period, in each case, plus a margin. Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of unused credit available on the M&T Revolving Credit Facility. Commitment fees and interestInterest rate margins and commitment fees are determined on a quarterly basis based upon the Company’s calculated leverage ratio, as defined in the M&T Credit Agreement. The one-month LIBOR as of March 29, 201425, 2017 was 0.2%1.0%. The Company’s interest rate for fiscal year 20142017 ranged from 1.1%1.3% to 1.7%3.0%.
Covenants:Covenants. The M&T Credit Agreement has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply, including a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant and a leverage ratio covenant. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants and requirements throughoutduring fiscal year 2014.years 2017 and 2016.
Other Terms.Terms:The Company has pledged all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property, the equity interests of its U.S.-based subsidiaries, and a majority of the common stock of Transmation (Canada)Transcat Canada Inc. as collateral security for the loans made under the M&T Revolving Credit Facility.
NOTE 4 – INCOME TAXES
Transcat’s net income before income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Income is as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||
| United States | $ | 6,770 | $ | 5,760 | ||
| Foreign | 394 | 247 | ||||
| Total | $ | 7,164 | $ | 6,007 | ||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| United States | $ | 6,642 | $ | 6,188 | ||||
| Foreign | (196 | ) | (470 | ) | ||||
| Total | $ | 6,446 | $ | 5,718 | ||||
The net provision for income taxes for fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 is as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||||
| Current Tax Provision: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | 1,945 | $ | 1,367 | ||||
| State | 344 | 202 | ||||||
| Foreign | 279 | 174 | ||||||
| 2,568 | 1,743 | |||||||
| Deferred Tax (Benefit) Provision: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | 194 | $ | 266 | ||||
| State | 26 | 85 | ||||||
| Foreign | (146 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||
| 74 | 140 | |||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | $ | 2,642 | $ | 1,883 | ||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Current Tax Provision: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | 2,415 | $ | 1,701 | ||||
| State | 357 | 270 | ||||||
| 2,772 | 1,971 | |||||||
| Deferred Tax (Benefit) Provision: | ||||||||
| Federal | (277 | ) | 113 | |||||
| State | (33 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
| (310 | ) | 43 | ||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | $ | 2,462 | $ | 2,014 | ||||
A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed by applying the statutory United StatesU.S. federal income tax rate and the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income is as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||||
| Federal Income Tax at Statutory Rate | $ | 2,436 | $ | 2,042 | ||||
| State Income Taxes, net of federal benefit | 284 | 226 | ||||||
| Federal, State and Foreign Research & Development Credits | 118 | (479 | ) | |||||
| Other, net | (196 | ) | 94 | |||||
| Total | $ | 2,642 | $ | 1,883 | ||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Federal Income Tax at Statutory Rate | $ | 2,192 | $ | 1,944 | ||||
| State Income Taxes, net of Federal benefit | 258 | 229 | ||||||
| Other, net | 12 | (159 | ) | |||||
| Total | $ | 2,462 | $ | 2,014 | ||||
The components of the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
| March 25, | March 26, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Deferred Tax Assets: | ||||||||
| Accrued Liabilities | $ | 338 | $ | 399 | ||||
| Performance-Based Stock Award Grants | 337 | 335 | ||||||
| Inventory Reserves | 213 | 163 | ||||||
| �� Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan | 273 | 273 | ||||||
| Post-Retirement Health Care Plans | 425 | 387 | ||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 717 | 808 | ||||||
| Capitalized Inventory Costs | 140 | 117 | ||||||
| Net Operating Loss Carryforward | 12 | 133 | ||||||
| Other | 277 | 313 | ||||||
| Total Deferred Tax Assets | $ | 2,732 | $ | 2,928 | ||||
| Deferred Tax Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Goodwill and Intangible Assets | $ | (1,486 | ) | $ | (1,865 | ) | ||
| Depreciation | (2,335 | ) | (2,127 | ) | ||||
| Other | (45 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
| Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | (3,866 | ) | (3,999 | ) | ||||
| Net Deferred Tax Liabilities | $ | (1,134 | ) | $ | (1,071 | ) | ||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||||
| Current Deferred Tax Assets: | ||||||||
| Accrued Liabilities | $ | 366 | $ | 333 | ||||
| Performance-Based Grants | 809 | 483 | ||||||
| Other | 221 | 271 | ||||||
| Total Current Deferred Tax Assets | 1,396 | 1,087 | ||||||
| Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities): | ||||||||
| Goodwill and Intangible Assets | (1,334 | ) | (1,449 | ) | ||||
| Depreciation | (971 | ) | (777 | ) | ||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 816 | 780 | ||||||
| Other Liabilities | 630 | 556 | ||||||
| Other | 252 | 339 | ||||||
| Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Liabilities | (607 | ) | (551 | ) | ||||
| Net Deferred Tax Assets | $ | 789 | $ | 536 | ||||
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis differences related to the investments in the Company’s foreign subsidiary. The Company considers undistributed earnings, if any, as permanently reinvested in the subsidiary. Therefore, theThe determination of a deferred tax liability on unremitted earnings would not be practicable because such liability, if any, would depend on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs. As of March 29, 2014, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards, relating to its foreign subsidiary, of $0.7 million, which are available to offset future taxable income of the subsidiary through March 2033.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and Canada. The Company is no longer subject to examination by U.S. federal income tax authorities for the fiscal years 20102013 and prior, by state tax authorities for the fiscal years 20082011 and prior, and by Canadian tax authorities for the fiscal years 20062009 and prior. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) notified the Company that it will be examining the Company’s U.S. federal income tax return for the tax year ended March 30, 2013. To date, the IRS has not proposed any adjustments to the tax return under examination. There are no tax years currently under examination by U.S. federal, state or Canadian tax authorities.
During fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, there were no uncertain tax positions, and the Company expects no material uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes.positions. No interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions were recognized in fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 or were accrued at March 29, 201425, 2017 and March 30, 2013.
At March 25, 2017, the deferred tax asset related to U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of less than $0.1 million and U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards of less than $0.1 million are available to reduce future taxable income. The utilization of these losses is subject to an annual limitation due to ownership change rules set forth under Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
The Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 was 36.9% and 31.3%, respectively. Its tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amounts of income the Company earns in those jurisdictions, which the Company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year but are not consistent from year to year.
The Company expects to receive certain federal, state and Canadian tax credits in future years. As such, it expects its effective tax rate in fiscal year 2018 to be between 34.0% and 36.0%.
NOTE 5 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plan.All of Transcat’s U.S. basedU.S.-based employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan, the Long-Term Savings and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”), provided they meet certain qualifications are met.qualifications. Currently, the Company matches 50% of the first 6% of pay that eligible employees contribute to the Plan.
In the long-term savings portion of the Plan (the “401K Plan”), plan participants are entitled to a distribution of their vested account balance upon termination of employment or retirement. Plan participants are fully vested in their contributions while Company contributions are fully vested after three years of service. The Company’s matching contributions to the 401K Plan were $0.4$0.7 million and $0.5$0.6 million in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
In the deferred profit sharing portion of the Plan, Company contributions are made at the discretion of the board of directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in fiscal years 20142017 and 2013.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.The Company has available a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “NQDC Plan”) for directors and officers. Participants are fully vested in their contributions. At its discretion, the Company may elect to match employee contributions, subject to legal limitations in conjunction with the 401K Plan, which fully vest after three years of service. During fiscal year 2014,years 2017 and 2016, the Company did not match any employee contributions, and in fiscal year 2013, the Company made matching contributions of less than $0.1 million.contributions. Participant accounts are adjusted to reflect performance, whether positive or negative, of selected investment options chosen by each participant during the deferral period. In the event of bankruptcy, the assets of the NQDC Plan are available to satisfy the claims of the Company’s general creditors. The liability for compensation deferred under the NQDC Plan was $0.8$0.7 million as of March 29, 201425, 2017 and $0.6 million as of March 30, 201326, 2016 and is included as a component of other liabilities (non-current) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
PostretirementPost-retirement Health Care Plans.The Company has a defined benefit postretirementpost-retirement health care plan which provides long-term care insurance benefits, medical and dental insurance benefits and medical premium reimbursement benefits to eligible retired corporate officers and their eligible spouses (the “Officer Plan”).
The change in the postretirement benefit obligation is as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||||
| Post-retirement benefit obligation, at beginning of fiscal year | $ | 1,006 | $ | 1,001 | ||||
| Service cost | 30 | 34 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 38 | 37 | ||||||
| Benefits paid | (79 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
| Actuarial loss | 110 | 4 | ||||||
| Post-retirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year | 1,105 | 1,006 | ||||||
| Fair value of plan assets, at end of fiscal year | - | - | ||||||
| Funded status, at end of fiscal year | $ | (1,105 | ) | $ | (1,006 | ) | ||
| Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year | $ | 1,105 | $ | 1,006 | ||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Postretirement benefit obligation, at beginning of fiscal year | $ | 887 | $ | 780 | ||||
| Service cost | 32 | 59 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 38 | 41 | ||||||
| Benefits paid | (29 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (46 | ) | 75 | |||||
| Postretirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year | 882 | 887 | ||||||
| Fair value of plan assets, at end of fiscal year | - | - | ||||||
| Funded status, at end of year | $ | (882 | ) | $ | (887 | ) | ||
| Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year | $ | 882 | $ | 887 | ||||
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is included as a component of other liabilities (non-current) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are as follows:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||||
| Net periodic postretirement benefit cost: | ||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 30 | $ | 34 | ||||
| Interest cost | 38 | 37 | ||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | 25 | 58 | ||||||
| 93 | 129 | |||||||
| Benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income: | ||||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | (25 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
| Net gain (loss) | 95 | (8 | ) | |||||
| 70 | (66 | ) | ||||||
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and | ||||||||
| other comprehensive income | $ | 163 | $ | 63 | ||||
| Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, | ||||||||
| at end of fiscal year: | ||||||||
| Unrecognized prior service cost | $ | 233 | $ | 162 | ||||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Net periodic postretirement benefit cost: | ||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 32 | $ | 59 | ||||
| Interest cost | 38 | 41 | ||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | 58 | 58 | ||||||
| 128 | 158 | |||||||
| Benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income: | ||||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | (58 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
| Net loss | (46 | ) | 58 | |||||
| (104 | ) | - | ||||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income | $ | 24 | $ | 158 | ||||
| Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, at end of fiscal year: | ||||||||
| Unrecognized prior service cost | $ | 154 | $ | 258 | ||||
The prior service cost is amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of active participants forin the Officer Plan. The estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive gainincome into net periodic postretirement benefit cost during fiscal year 20152018 is less than $0.1 million.
The postretirement benefit obligation was computed by an independent third partythird-party actuary. Assumptions used to determine the postretirement benefit obligation and the net periodic postretirement benefit cost were as follows:
| March 25, | March 26, | |||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
| Weighted average discount rate | 4.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Medical care cost trend rate: | ||||
| Trend rate assumed for next year | 8.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Ultimate trend rate | 6.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Year that rate reaches ultimate trend rate | 2023 | 2022 | ||
| Dental care cost trend rate: | ||||
| Trend rate assumed for next year and | ||||
| remaining at that level thereafter | 5.0% | 5.0% | ||
March 29, 2014 | March 30, 2013 | |||||
| Weighted average discount rate | 4.5% | 4.5% | ||||
| Medical care cost trend rate: | ||||||
| Trend rate assumed for next year | 8.0% | 8.0% | ||||
| Ultimate trend rate | 5.0% | 5.0% | ||||
| Year that rate reaches ultimate trend rate | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| Dental care cost trend rate: | ||||||
| Trend rate assumed for next year and remaining at that level thereafter | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Benefit payments are funded by the Company as needed. Payments toward the cost of a retiree’s medical and dental coverage are initially determined as a percentage of a base coverage plan in the year of retirement and are limited to increase at a rate of no more than 50% of the annual increase in medical and dental costs, as defined in the plan document. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:
| Fiscal | |||
| Year | Amount | ||
| 2018 | $ | 83 | |
| 2019 | 79 | ||
| 2020 | 85 | ||
| 2021 | 92 | ||
| 2022 | 98 | ||
| Thereafter | 668 | ||
Fiscal Year | Amount | |||||
| 2015 | $ | 39 | ||||
| 2016 | 68 | |||||
| 2017 | 54 | |||||
| 2018 | 47 | |||||
| 2019 | 64 | |||||
| Thereafter | 610 | |||||
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic postretirement benefit cost by $0.1 million. A one percentage point decrease in the healthcare cost trend would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic postretirement benefit cost by $0.1 million.
NOTE 6 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated (the “2003 Plan”), provides for, among other awards, grants of restricted stock units and stock options to directors, officers and key employees at the fair market value at the date of grant. At March 29, 2014, the number of shares25, 2017, 1.3 million restricted stock units or stock options were available for future grant under the 2003 Plan totaled 1.5 million.
Restricted Stock:The Company grants performance-based restricted stock units as a primary component of executive compensation. The units generally vest following the third fiscal year from the date of grant subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible period. Compensation cost ultimately recognized for performance-based restricted stock units will equal the grant date fair market value of the unit that coincides with the actual outcome of the performance conditions. On an interim basis, the Company records compensation cost based on an assessmentthe estimated level of the probabilityachievement of achieving the performance conditions.
The following table summarizes the performance-based restricted stock units vested and shares issued during fiscal years 20132016 and 2014:2017:
| Total | Grant Date | Number | ||||||||||||
| Number | Fair | Target | of | Date | ||||||||||
| Date | Measurement | of Units | Value | Level | Shares | Shares | ||||||||
| Granted | Period | Granted | Per Unit | Achieved | Issued | Issued | ||||||||
| April 2012 | April 2012 - March 2015 | 24 | $ | 13.11 | 75 | % | 18 | May 2015 | ||||||
| April 2013 | April 2013 - March 2016 | 99 | $ | 6.17 | 50 | % | 50 | May 2016 | ||||||
Date Granted | Measurement Period | Total Number of Units Granted | Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit | Target Level Achieved | Number of Shares Issued | Date Shares Issued | |||||||||||
| April 2009 | April 2009 - March 2012 | 70 | $ | 5.00 | 75% | 52 | May 2012 | ||||||||||
| April 2010 | April 2010 - March 2013 | 37 | $ | 7.00 | 75% | 28 | May 2013 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes the non-vested performance-based restricted stock units outstanding as of March 29, 2014:25, 2017:
| Total | Grant Date | Estimated | |||||||
| Number | Fair | Level of | |||||||
| Date | Measurement | of Units | Value | Achievement at | |||||
| Granted | Period | Granted | Per Unit | March 25, 2017 | |||||
| April 2014 | April 2014 - March 2017 | 51 | $ | 9.28 | 50% of target level | ||||
| April 2015 | April 2015 – March 2018 | 63 | $ | 9.59 | 50% of target level | ||||
| April 2016 | April 2016 – March 2019 | 84 | $ | 10.13 | 100% of target level | ||||
Date Granted | Measurement Period | Total Number of Units Granted | Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit | Estimated Probability of Achievement at March 29, 2014 | ||||||||
| April 2011 | April 2011 - March 2014 (1) | 37 | $ | 8.44 | 114% | of target level | ||||||
| April 2012 | April 2012 - March 2015 | 24 | $ | 13.11 | 100% | of target level | ||||||
| April 2013 | April 2013 - March 2016 | 102 | $ | 6.17 | 100% | of target level | ||||||
Total expense relating to performance-based restricted stock units, based on grant date fair value and the achievement criteria, was $0.4$0.3 million and $0.2 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. Unearned compensation totaled $0.7 million as of March 25, 2017.
During fiscal year 2017, no stock options were awarded. During fiscal year 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors granted a stock award of two thousand shares of common stock under the 2003 Plan to a retiring board member. The award vested in the second quarter of fiscal year 2016. There was no expense relating to these stock awards, based on grant date fair value in fiscal year 2017. The expense related to these stock awards was less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2014 and $0.3 million in fiscal year 2013. Unearned compensation totaled $0.5 million as of March 29, 2014.
Stock Options:Options generally vest over a period of up to four years, using either a graded schedule or on a straight-line basis, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The expense relating to options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
The following table summarizes the Company’s options for fiscal years 20142017 and 2013:2016:
| Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
| Average | Average | ||||||||||
| Number | Exercise | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||
| of | Price Per | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||
| Shares | Share | Term (in Years) | Value | ||||||||
| Outstanding as of March 28, 2015 | 561 | $ | 6.83 | ||||||||
| Exercised | (50 | ) | 5.35 | ||||||||
| Forfeited | (1 | ) | 4.26 | ||||||||
| Redeemed | (16 | ) | 5.68 | ||||||||
| Outstanding as of March 26, 2016 | 494 | 7.03 | |||||||||
| Exercised | (59 | ) | 7.00 | ||||||||
| Forfeited | (5 | ) | 8.95 | ||||||||
| Redeemed | (188 | ) | 6.40 | ||||||||
| Outstanding as of March 25, 2017 | 242 | 7.48 | 3 | $ | 1,217 | ||||||
| Exercisable as of March 25, 2017 | 182 | $ | 7.45 | 2 | $ | 920 | |||||
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of March 31, 2012 | 597 | $ | 5.94 | ||||||||||||
| Exercised | (21 | ) | 3.08 | ||||||||||||
| Forfeited | (22 | ) | 6.57 | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of March 30, 2013 | 554 | 6.02 | |||||||||||||
| Granted | 110 | 7.64 | |||||||||||||
| Exercised | (52 | ) | 3.04 | ||||||||||||
| Forfeited | (3 | ) | 4.93 | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding as of March 29, 2014 | 609 | 6.58 | 4 | $ | 1,645 | ||||||||||
| Exercisable as of March 29, 2014 | 509 | 6.38 | 3 | 1,474 | |||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of fiscal year 20142017 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) that would have been received by the option holders had all holders exercised their options on March 29, 2014.25, 2017. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.
During both of fiscal years 2017 and 2016, total expense relating to stock options was $0.1 million. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as of March 29, 201425, 2017 was $0.4less than $0.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years.one year. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised in fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 was $0.3 million and less than $0.1$0.2 million, respectively. Cash received from the exercise of options in fiscal year 2014years 2017 and 2016 was $0.2$0.4 million and was less than $0.1$0.3 million, in fiscal year 2013.
NOTE 7 – SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution and Service. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 ofto the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment and geographic data for fiscal years 20142017 and 2013:2016:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||
| Revenue: | ||||||
| Service | $ | 71,103 | $ | 59,202 | ||
| Distribution | 72,795 | 62,964 | ||||
| Total | 143,898 | 122,166 | ||||
| Gross Profit: | ||||||
| Service | 19,039 | 15,585 | ||||
| Distribution | 15,931 | 13,534 | ||||
| Total | 34,970 | 29,119 | ||||
| Operating Expenses: | ||||||
| Service (1) | 14,270 | 11,430 | ||||
| Distribution (1) | 12,766 | 11,387 | ||||
| Total | 27,036 | 22,817 | ||||
| Operating Income: | ||||||
| Service | 4,769 | 4,155 | ||||
| Distribution | 3,165 | 2,147 | ||||
| Total | 7,934 | 6,302 | ||||
| Unallocated Amounts: | ||||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 770 | 295 | ||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2,642 | 1,883 | ||||
| Total | 3,412 | 2,178 | ||||
| Net Income | $ | 4,522 | $ | 4,124 | ||
| Total Assets: | ||||||
| Service | $ | 51,756 | $ | 48,640 | ||
| Distribution | 36,812 | 24,878 | ||||
| Unallocated | 3,529 | 3,189 | ||||
| Total | $ | 92,097 | $ | 76,707 | ||
| Depreciation and Amortization (2): | ||||||
| Service | $ | 4,660 | $ | 3,216 | ||
| Distribution | 1,524 | 730 | ||||
| Total | $ | 6,184 | $ | 3,946 | ||
| Capital Expenditures: | ||||||
| Service | $ | 2,662 | $ | 3,133 | ||
| Distribution | 2,588 | 968 | ||||
| Total | $ | 5,250 | $ | 4,101 | ||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||
Distribution | $ | 70,324 | $ | 71,641 | ||||
| Service | 48,184 | 40,655 | ||||||
| Total | 118,508 | 112,296 | ||||||
| Gross Profit: | ||||||||
| Distribution | 16,965 | 17,102 | ||||||
| Service | 12,825 | 10,302 | ||||||
| Total | 29,790 | 27,404 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses: | ||||||||
| Distribution (1) | 12,639 | 12,467 | ||||||
| Service (1) | 10,446 | 8,991 | ||||||
| Total | 23,085 | 21,458 | ||||||
| Operating Income: | ||||||||
| Distribution | 4,326 | 4,635 | ||||||
| Service | 2,379 | 1,311 | ||||||
| Total | 6,705 | 5,946 | ||||||
| Unallocated Amounts: | ||||||||
| Interest and Other Expense, net | 259 | 228 | ||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | 2,462 | 2,014 | ||||||
| Total | 2,721 | 2,242 | ||||||
| Net Income | $ | 3,984 | $ | 3,704 | ||||
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||
| Geographic Data: | ||||||
| Revenues to Unaffiliated Customers (3): | ||||||
| United States (4) | $ | 129,732 | $ | 109,770 | ||
| Canada | 12,432 | 10,854 | ||||
| Other International | 1,734 | 1,542 | ||||
| Total | $ | 143,898 | $ | 122,166 | ||
| Long-Lived Assets: | ||||||
| United States (4) | $ | 14,550 | $ | 11,337 | ||
| Canada | 1,018 | 976 | ||||
| Total | $ | 15,568 | $ | 12,313 | ||
| FY 2014 | FY 2013 | |||||||
| Total Assets: | ||||||||
| Distribution | $ | 24,715 | $ | 25,932 | ||||
| Service | 24,902 | 24,785 | ||||||
| Unallocated | 4,257 | 4,330 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 53,874 | $ | 55,047 | ||||
| Depreciation and Amortization (2): | ||||||||
| Distribution | $ | 801 | $ | 962 | ||||
| Service | 2,144 | 1,740 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 2,945 | $ | 2,702 | ||||
| Capital Expenditures: | ||||||||
| Distribution | $ | 441 | $ | 193 | ||||
| Service | 1,520 | 2,464 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 1,961 | $ | 2,657 | ||||
| Geographic Data: | ||||||||
| Revenues to Unaffiliated Customers (3): | ||||||||
| United States (4) | $ | 107,007 | $ | 101,850 | ||||
| Canada | 9,235 | 7,873 | ||||||
| Other International | 2,266 | 2,573 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 118,508 | $ | 112,296 | ||||
| Long-Lived Assets: | ||||||||
| United States (4) | $ | 6,635 | $ | 6,400 | ||||
| Canada | 454 | 485 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 7,089 | $ | 6,885 | ||||
| (1) | Operating expense allocations between segments |
| (2) | Including amortization of catalog |
| (3) | Revenues are attributed to the countries based on the destination of a product shipment or the location where service is rendered. |
| (4) | United States includes Puerto Rico. |
NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS
Leases:Transcat leases facilities, equipment, and vehicles under various non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental expense was approximately $2.0$3.0 million and $2.4 million in fiscal year 2014years 2017 and $1.8 million in fiscal year 2013.2016, respectively. The minimum future annual rental payments under the non-cancelable leases at March 29, 201425, 2017 are as follows (in millions):
| Fiscal Year | |||
| 2018 | $ | 2.2 | |
| 2019 | 1.6 | ||
| 2020 | 1.0 | ||
| 2021 | 0.5 | ||
| 2022 | 0.4 | ||
| Thereafter | 0.2 | ||
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 5.9 | |
Effective April 2016, the Company has term loan payments due at a monthly amount of $0.1 million plus interest. These amounts are not reflected in the table above.
| Fiscal Year | ||||||
| 2015 | $ | 1.6 | ||||
| 2016 | 1.4 | |||||
| 2017 | 1.1 | |||||
| 2018 | 1.0 | |||||
| 2019 | 0.8 | |||||
| Thereafter | 0.6 | |||||
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 6.5 | ||||
NOTE 9 – BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
The Company has engaged in a number of business acquisitions. During fiscal year 2013,years 2017 and 2016, Transcat completed the following:
On |
| ● | Effective August 24, 2015, acquired Anmar Metrology, Inc. (“ |
| ● | On August 25, 2015, acquired Nordcal Calibration Inc. (“Nordcal”), a provider of radio frequency and electronic calibration and repair services, located in Montreal, Quebec. |
| ● | Effective December 31, 2015, acquired substantially all of the assets of Spectrum Technologies, Inc. ("Spectrum"). Headquartered in Paxinos, Pennsylvania, Spectrum provides commercial calibrations, test equipment repair services and product sales throughout North America. |
| ● | Effective January 18, 2016, acquired Dispersion Laboratory Inc. ("Dispersion"), headquartered near Montreal, Quebec, Dispersion provides fully accredited services for the calibration, repair and product sales of weights, balances, temperature instruments and liquid handling devices. |
| ● | On April 1, 2016, acquired substantially all of the assets of Excalibur Engineering, Inc. (“Excalibur”). Headquartered in Irvine, California, Excalibur is a provider of calibration services, new and used test equipment, and product rentals. |
These transactions align with the Company’s acquisition strategy of targeting service businesses that expand the Company’s geographic reach and leverage its infrastructure while also increasing the depth and breadth of the Company’s service capabilities.
The acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Goodwill, representscalculated as the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the underlying net assets of the businesses acquired.acquired, generally represents expected future economic benefits arising from the reputation of an acquired business, the assembled workforce, expected synergies and other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. Other intangible assets, namely customer basebases and covenants not to compete, represent an allocation of a portion of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of the acquired businesses. Intangible assets are being amortized for financial reporting purposes on an accelerated basis over thean estimated useful life of up to 10 years. GoodwillAmortization of goodwill and the intangible assets relating to the Anacor acquisition areUlrich, Anmar, Nordcal and Dispersion acquisitions is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill and the intangible assets relating to the Cal-Matrix acquisition are not deductible for tax purposes.
The total purchase price paid for the businesses acquired in fiscal year 20132017 was approximately $7.0 million.$7.6 million, net of less than $0.1 million cash acquired. The total purchase price paid for the businesses acquired in fiscal year 2016 was approximately $16.3 million, net of $0.2 million cash acquired. The following is a summary of the purchase price allocation, in the aggregate, to the fair value, based on Level 3 inputs, of assets and liabilities acquired during each period presented:
| FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||||
| Goodwill | $ | 3,455 | $ | 8,418 | ||||
| Intangible Assets – Customer Base | 1,990 | 5,617 | ||||||
| Intangible Assets – Covenants Not to Compete | 100 | 510 | ||||||
| Deferred Tax Liability | - | (297 | ) | |||||
| 5,545 | 14,248 | |||||||
| Plus: | Current Assets | 973 | 1,272 | |||||
| Non-Current Assets | 1,652 | 1,709 | ||||||
| Less: | Current Liabilities | (606 | ) | (343 | ) | |||
| Non-Current Liabilities | (611 | ) | ||||||
| Total Purchase Price | $ | 7,564 | $ | 16,275 | ||||
The business acquisitions completed during fiscal years 2017 and 2016 include holdback provisions for contingent consideration and other holdback amounts, as defined by the businesses acquiredrespective purchase agreements. The Company accrues contingent consideration, if any, based on its estimated fair value at the date of acquisition, in addition to other amounts relating to the holdback provisions. Contingent consideration of $0.3 million and other holdback amounts of $2.7 million were paid during fiscal year 2013:
| Allocation of Purchase Price: | |||||
| Goodwill | $ | 4,234 | |||
| Intangible Assets – Customer Base | 1,493 | ||||
| Intangible Assets – Covenants Not to Compete | 569 | ||||
| Deferred Tax Liability | (375 | ) | |||
| 5,921 | |||||
| Plus: | Current Assets | 1,184 | |||
| Non-Current Assets | 331 | ||||
| Less: | Current Liabilities | (407 | ) | ||
| Total Purchase Price | $ | 7,029 | |||
During fiscal years 2017 and 2016, acquisition costs of $0.4$0.1 million in fiscal year 2013and $0.6 million, respectively, were incurred and recorded as incurred as angeneral and administrative expenseexpenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in Transcat’s consolidated operating results as of the date the businesses were acquired. The following unaudited pro forma information presents the Company’s results of operations as if the business acquisitions completed in fiscal year 2013 had occurred at the beginning of the respective fiscal year. The pro forma results do not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations actually would have been if the transactions had occurred at the beginning of each period presented or what the Company’s operating results will be in future periods.
| (Unaudited) | |||||
| For the Years Ended | |||||
| March 25, | March 26, | ||||
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||
| Total Revenue | $ | 144,048 | $ | 136,292 | |
| Net Income | 4,525 | 5,323 | |||
| Basic Earnings Per Share | 0.65 | 0.77 | |||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | 0.64 | 0.75 | |||
| (Unaudited) | ||||
| FY 2013 | ||||
| Total Revenue | $ | 115,708 | ||
| Net Income | $ | 4,382 | ||
| Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.59 | ||
| Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.58 | ||
The following table presents a summary of certain unaudited quarterly financial data for fiscal years 20142017 and 2013:2016:
| Basic | Diluted | ||||||||||||||
| Total | Gross | Net | Earnings | Earnings | |||||||||||
| Revenues | Profit | Income | Per Share (a) | Per Share (a) | |||||||||||
| FY 2017: | |||||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 38,453 | $ | 9,782 | $ | 1,429 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | |||||
| Third Quarter | 37,813 | 8,915 | 1,271 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||||||||||
| Second Quarter | 34,485 | 8,027 | 916 | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
| First Quarter | 33,147 | 8,246 | 906 | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
| FY 2016: | |||||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 32,860 | $ | 8,542 | $ | 1,577 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 | |||||
| Third Quarter | 30,160 | 6,778 | 1,068 | 0.15 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
| Second Quarter | 29,476 | 6,737 | 878 | 0.13 | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| First Quarter | 29,670 | 7,062 | 601 | 0.09 | 0.08 | ||||||||||
Total Revenues | Gross Profit | Net Income | Basic Earnings Per Share (a) | Diluted Earnings Per Share (a) | ||||||||||||||||
| FY 2014: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 30,403 | $ | 8,617 | $ | 1,704 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||
| Third Quarter | 30,513 | 7,138 | 788 | 0.11 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||
| Second Quarter | 28,882 | 6,821 | 771 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | 28,710 | 7,214 | 721 | 0.10 | 0.09 | |||||||||||||||
| FY 2013: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 31,087 | $ | 8,489 | $ | 1,816 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||
| Third Quarter | 29,324 | 6,630 | 782 | 0.11 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
| Second Quarter | 26,788 | 6,078 | 745 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | 25,097 | 6,207 | 361 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
| (a) | Earnings per share calculations for each quarter include the weighted average effect of stock issuances and common stock equivalents for the quarter; therefore the sum of quarterly earnings per share amounts may not equal full-year earnings per share amounts, which reflect the weighted average effect on an annual basis. Diluted earnings per share calculations for each quarter include the effect of stock options and non-vested restricted stock units, when dilutive to the quarter. In addition, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share may not add due to rounding. |
None.
(a)Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (“Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. In designing and evaluating our internal control system, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and that the effectiveness of any system has inherent limitations including, but not limited to, the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, is required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected in a timely manner.
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our procedures and internal control over financial reporting using the framework and criteria establisheddescribed in theInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 1992.Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of March 29, 2014.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for smaller reporting companies that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
(c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Not applicable.
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Election“Proposal One: Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance,” “Executive Officers”Officers and Senior Management” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 29, 201425, 2017 fiscal year end.
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting2017 AnnualMeeting of Shareholders under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 29, 201425, 2017 fiscal year end.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
With the exception of the information presented in the table below, the information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Management,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 29, 201425, 2017 fiscal year end.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of March 29, 2014:25, 2017:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
| Number of securities | |||||||||
| Number of securities | remaining available | ||||||||
| to be issued | Weighted average | for future issuance under | |||||||
| upon exercise of | exercise price of | equity compensation plans | |||||||
| outstanding options, | outstanding options, | (excluding securities | |||||||
| Plan category | warrants and rights | warrants and rights | reflected in column (a)) | ||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 242 | (1) | $ | 7.48 | (2) | 1,310 | |||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | - | - | - | ||||||
| Total | 242 | $ | 7.48 | 1,310 | |||||
| Number of securities | ||||||||||||
| Number of securities | remaining available | |||||||||||
| to be issued | Weighted average | for future issuance under | ||||||||||
| upon exercise of | exercise price of | equity compensation plans | ||||||||||
| outstanding options, | outstanding options, | (excluding securities | ||||||||||
| Plan category | warrants and rights | warrants and rights | reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans | ||||||||||||
| approved by security holders | 771 | (1) | $ | 6.58 | (2) | 1,473 | ||||||
| Equity compensation plans | ||||||||||||
| not approved by security holders | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Total | 771 | $ | 6.58 | 1,473 | ||||||||
| (1) | Includes performance-based restricted stock units granted to officers and key employees pursuant to our 2003 Incentive Plan. See Note 6 |
| (2) | Does not include restricted stock units. |
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Corporate Governance” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 29, 201425, 2017 fiscal year end.
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the heading “Ratification of Selection of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 29, 201425, 2017 fiscal year end.
(a) See Index to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
(b) Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits contained in this report.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| TRANSCAT, INC. | ||||||
| Date: June | /s/ Lee D. Rudow | |||||
| By: | Lee D. Rudow | |||||
| President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Date | Signature | Title | ||||||
| June | /s/ Lee D. Rudow | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
| Lee D. Rudow | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||||||
| June 19, 2017 | /s/ Michael J Tschiderer | Vice President of Finance and | ||||||
| Michael J. Tschiderer | Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
| (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||||||
| June | /s/ | |||||||
| Scott D. Deverell | ( | |||||||
| Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||||||
| June | /s/ Charles P. Hadeed | |||||||
| Charles P. Hadeed | ||||||||
| June | ||||||||
| /s/ Richard J. Harrison | Director | |||||||
| Richard J. Harrison | ||||||||
| June 19, 2017 | /s/ Gary J. Haseley | Director | ||||||
| Gary J. Haseley | ||||||||
| June | /s/ Paul D. Moore | Director | ||||||
| Paul D. Moore | ||||||||
| June | ||||||||
| /s/ Angela J. Panzarella | Director | |||||||
| Angela J. Panzarella | ||||||||
| June | /s/ Alan H. Resnick | Director | ||||||
| Alan H. Resnick | ||||||||
| June 19, 2017 | ||||||||
| /s/ Carl E. Sassano | Director | |||||||
| Carl E. Sassano | ||||||||
| June | /s/ John T. Smith | Director | ||||||
| John T. Smith | ||||||||
| (3) |
3.1(b) Certificate of Amendment to the Articles is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. Certificate of Amendment to the Articles is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012. Certificate of Amendment to the Articles is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2015. 3.2 Code of Regulations, as amended through May 5, 2014, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2014. Material contracts 10.1 Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix D to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on July 10, 2006 in connection with the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 10.2 Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on July 22, 2011 in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 10.3 Amendment No. 1 to the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix B to the 10.4 Form of Award Notice for Incentive Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004. 10.5 Form of Award Notice for Restricted Stock granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004. 10.6 Form of Award Notice for Non-Qualified Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2005. 10.7 Form of Award Notice for Performance-Based Restricted Stock granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2009. 10.8 Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2013. 10.9 Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 26, 2016. Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2012, by and between Transcat, Inc. andManufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2012. Letter from Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company to the Company, dated October 7, 2013, regarding the exclusion of payments made to repurchase stock from certain financial covenant provisions under the Credit Facility Agreement with the Company dated as of September 20, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Master Security Agreement, dated September 20, 2012, by and between Transcat, Inc., United Scale & Engineering Corporation, WTT Real Estate Acquisition, LLC, Anacor Acquisition, LLC and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2012. Credit Facility Agreement Amendment 1 dated as of August 26, 2014 by and among Transcat, Inc. and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2014. 10.14 Credit Facility Agreement Amendment 2 dated as of December 30, 2015 by and among Transcat, Inc. and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2015. 10.15 Credit Facility Agreement Amendment 3 dated as of March 31, 2016 by and among Transcat, Inc. and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 26, 2016. 10.16 Lease Addendum between Gallina Development Corporation and Transcat, Inc., dated June 2, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008. 10.17 Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for Officers (Amended and Restated Effective April 2, 2012) is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. 10.18 Transcat, Inc. Executive Officer and Director Share Repurchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2011. 10.19 Transcat, Inc. 2009 Insider Stock Sales Plan, as amended is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012. 10.20 Agreement for Severance Upon Change in Control between Transcat, Inc. and Lee D. Rudow dated as of May 7, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2012. 10.21 Asset Purchase Agreement 10.22 Asset Purchase Agreement Computation can be Consents of experts and counsel Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 101.INS XBRL Instance Document 57INDEX TO EXHIBITS(3)Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws 3.13.1(a) The Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”), are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-61665) filed on August 8, 1995 and1995. 3.13.1(c) 3.23.1(d) (10)(10) # # # Company'sCompany’s definitive proxy statement filed on July 26, 2013 in connection with the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. # # # # # 10.9#10.10 10.1010.11 Company'sCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2013. 10.1110.12 47 10.1210.13 # 10.13 #10.14Certain compensation information for Lee D. Rudow, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2013.#10.15Certain compensation information for Lee D. Rudow, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2013.10.16 10.17 # 10.18 #10.19for Severance Upon Change in Control betweenentered into effective as of December 31, 2015 by and among Transcat, Inc., Spectrum Technologies, Inc. and Charles P. Hadeed, as amendedBrian E. Hubler and restated, dated as of May 7, 2012Kenneth E. Horvath is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1810.2 to the Company’s AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended March 31, 2012.December 26, 2015. #10.20Employment between the Company and Charles P. Hadeed dated as of April 1, 20132016 by and among Transcat, Inc., Excalibur Engineering, Inc., Christopher LaPlante Family Trust dated 12/23/97 and Christopher M. LaPlante is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2013.26, 2016.(11)(11) Statement re computationrecomputation of per share earnings clearly determined from the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income included in this Form 10-K under Part II, Item 8.(23)(23) �� *23.1 (31) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications *31.1 * 31.2 (32) Section 1350 Certifications *32.132.1 48(101)Interactive Data File (101) Interactive Data File * * 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ____________________________* Exhibit filed with this report. # Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. 49