UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K



ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016


2019

OR


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from                  to                 


Commission File No. 001-33601


GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware

 

74-2785449

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

   

4500 Lockhill-Selma, Suite 150

  

San Antonio, Texas

 

78249

(Address of Principal Executive Office)

 

(Zip Code)


(210) 308-8267

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
GSB
NYSE MKT,American, LLC
(Title of Class)(Trading Symbol) (Name of exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes    No


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes    No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes    No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

☒ Yes No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   Yes   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):


Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐

Accelerated filer 

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer ☐ 

Smaller reporting company ☒

Non-Accelerated filer

Emerging growth company 

Smaller Reporting Company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

☐ Yes☒ No


As of June 30, 2016,28, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stockequity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $50,513,026$120,695,655 based on the closing sale price as reported on the NYSE MKT.



American.

As of March 20, 2017,February 28, 2020, there were 21,566,83118,709,064 shares of common stock outstanding.



Documents Incorporated by Reference

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement forregistrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the 2017 Annual Meeting2020 annual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders to be held on May 10, 2017,filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference ininto Part III hereof.


of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



TABLE OF CONTENTS


 

Page

PART I

 
   

Item 1.

2

   

Item 1A.

15

12

   

Item 1B.

35
Item 2.35

33

   

Item 3.2.

35

33

   

Item 4.3.

35

33

   

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

34

PART II

 
   

Item 5.

36

35

   

Item 6.

36

   

Item 7.

37

36

   

Item 8.7A.

56

          43

   

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

44

Item 9.

83

68

   

Item 9A.

83

68

   

Item 9B.

83

69

  
PART III 
   
Item 10.

PART III

84
   

Item 11.10.

84

70

   

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

70

Item 12.

84

70

   

Item 13.

84

70

   

Item 14.

84

70

 

PART IV

 
   

Item 15.

85

71




Preliminary Notes


GlobalSCAPE®, CuteFTP®, CuteFTP Pro®, CuteBackup®, DMZ Gateway®, EFT Cloud Services®GlobalSCAPEServices, ®GlobalSCAPE Securely Connected®, CuteSendIt®, and Mail Express® are registered trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.


(together with its wholly owned subsidiary, “GlobalSCAPE”, the “Company” or “we”).  

Secure FTP Server™, Wide Area File Services™, WAFS™, CDP™, Advanced Workflow Engine™, AWE™, , EFT Server™, EFT Workspaces™, EFT Insight™, Enhanced File Transfer™, Enhanced File Transfer Server™, Secure Ad Hoc Transfer™, SAT™, EFT Server Enterprise™, Enhanced File Transfer Server Enterprise ™, Desktop Transfer Client™, DTC™, Mobile Transfer Client™, MTC™, Web Transfer Client™, Workspaces™, AccelerateAccelerate™, WTC™, Content Integrity Control™, Advanced AuthenticationAuthentication™, AAM™ and scConnect™ are trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 


TappIn® and design are registered trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary. 

TappIn Secure Share ™, Social Share ™, Now Playing ™, and Enhanced A La Carte Playlist ™, are trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary. 

Other trademarks and trade names in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) are the property of their respective owners.


In this report,Annual Report, we use the following terms:


“B2B” means business-to-business.


“BYOL” means bring your own license.


“Cloud” or “cloud computing” refers to pooled computing resources, delivered on-demand, over the Internet. In the same manner that electricity is delivered on-demand from large scale power plants, cloud computing is delivered from centralized data centers to users all over the world.


“DMZ” or Demilitarized Zone refers to a computer host or perimeter network inserted between a trusted internal network and an untrusted public network such as the Internet.


“FTP” or File Transfer Protocol is a protocol used to exchange or manipulate files over a computer network such as the Internet.


“MFT” or Managed File Transfer refers to software solutions that facilitate the secure transfer of data from one computer to another through a network.


“RFC” or Request for Comment is a memorandum published by the Internet Engineering Task Force describing methods, research, or innovations applicable to the working of the Internet and Internet-connected systems.


“SaaS” or Software-as-a-Service uses hosted, cloud computing approaches in which the customer additionallyclient does not need to install the underlying software on its own computer systems to access the application.


 “SSL”

“SSL” or Secure Sockets Layer uses cryptography to encrypt data between the web server and the web browser.



Forward-Looking Statements


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.amended (the “Exchange Act”). “Forward-looking statements” are those statements that are not of historical fact but describe management’s beliefs and expectations. We have identified many of the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report by using words such as “will”, “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “may,” “expect,” “potentially” and “intend.” Although we believe these expectations are reasonable, our operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission, or SEC. Therefore, GlobalSCAPE’s actual results could differ materially from those discussed in this Annual Report.


Transition to Accelerated Filer

The Company met the “accelerated filer” requirements as of the end of its 2017 fiscal year pursuant to Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. However, pursuant to Rule 12b-2, as amended June 28, 2018, and applicable SEC guidance, the Company also qualifies as a smaller reporting company and is eligible to comply with the scaled disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X and is also eligible to check the “smaller reporting company” box on the cover of this Annual Report.

1

1


PART I


ItemItem 1.     Business


Company Overview


GlobalSCAPE was incorporated in Delaware in 1996. We develop and sell computer software that provides secure information exchange, data transfer and sharing capabilities for enterprises and consumers. We have been in business for overmore than twenty years and have sold our products to thousands of enterprises and more than one million individual consumers throughoutserve over 100 companies in the world.


Fortune 500.

Our primary business is selling and supporting managed file transfer or MFT,(“MFT”) software for enterprises. MFT software facilitates the transfer of data from one location to another across a computer network within a single enterprise or between multiple computer networks in multiple enterprises. The brand name of

Our MFT products are based upon our MFT product platform is Enhanced File Transfer or EFT.


(“EFT”) platform. This on-premise and cloud-based delivery platform emphasizes secure and efficient data exchange for virtually any organization. It enables business partners, clients and employees to share critical information safely and securely. The EFT platform provides enterprise-level security while automating the integration of back-end systems which are features often missing from traditional file transfer software. The EFT platform features built-in regulatory compliance, governance, and visibility controls to maintain data safety and security. It can replace legacy systems, homegrown servers, expensive leased lines and virtual area networks. The EFT platform promotes ease of administration while providing the detailed capabilities necessary for complete control of a file transfer system.

We earn most of our revenue from the sale of products and services that compose our EFT and products that are partplatform. Our clients can purchase the capabilities of our EFT platform. platform in two ways:

Under a perpetual software license for which they pay a one-time fee and under which they typically install our product on computers they own and/or manage. Our brand name for this product is EFT. Almost every client who initially purchases EFT also purchases an annual maintenance and support (“M&S”) contract for which they pay an annual fee. Most of the revenue we have earned from our EFT platform products has been from sales of perpetual software licenses and related M&S.

As software-as-a-service, or SaaS, under which they pay us ongoing fees to access the capabilities of the EFT platform in the cloud. In January 2018, we introduced EFT Arcus, our SaaS offering of the EFT platform for which users pay a base monthly subscription fee plus an additional variable amount determined based upon their metered usage of EFT Arcus resources.

We earn revenue from the sale of perpetual software licenses, providing products under software-as-a-service, or SaaS, subscriptions, providing maintenance and support services, or M&S, and offering professional services for product customization and integration.


We also sell other products that are synergistic to our EFT platform including Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP. Collectively, these products constituted less than 10%2% of our total revenue in 2016.

2019. Clients pay a one-time fee to purchase these products under a perpetual software license. Some clients also purchase an M&S contract. We do not offer a SaaS version of these products and have no plans to do so. We continue to offer product support for Mail Express and WAFS, which we discontinued as products for sale as of January 1, 2019.

We also earn revenue from professional services we provide to assist our clients in configuring and integrating our EFT platform products into their environments.

We focus on selling our EFT platform products in a business-to-business environment. We expect that theThe majority of the resources we will expend in the future for product research, development, marketingsales and salesmarketing will focus on our EFT platformthis product line. We expect to expend minimal resources developing and selling other products. We believe our EFT platform products and business capabilities are well-positioned to compete effectively in the market for MFTthese products.


For a more comprehensive discussion of the products we sell and the services we offer, see Software Products and Services below.


We have won multiple awards for performance and reputation, including:

·

In 2016 and 2017:2019:

-Recognized

-

Awarded “Leader Winter 2020” by G2, for three Info Security Products Guide 2017 Global Excellence Awards for distinguished achievements in product innovation in categories that included:being rated highly by G2 users and having substantial Satisfaction and Market Presence scores. G2 is a respected peer to peer review site.

2

§Innovation in Compliance (Gold Winner) – Enhanced File Transfer

-

Awarded “Best Support Fall 2019” by G2 for having the Highest Quality of Support Relationship Index.

§Cloud/SaaS Solutions (Gold Winner) – EFT Cloud Services

-

Awarded “High Performer Fall 2019” by G2 for having high customer Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence scores compared to the rest of the category.

§BYOD Security (Bronze Winner) – EFT Workspaces

-

Recognized as a 2016 Top Workplace by San Antonio Express-News, marking GlobalSCAPE’s sixth recognition as a Top Workplace in San Antonio.
-Selected for CRN’s 2016 Cloud Computing Partner Program Guide
-Certified as a great workplace by the independent analysts at Great Place to Work
-Recognized for product excellence by the 2016 Golden Bridge Awards in several categories, including:
§EFT – Gold Winner in Access Compliance and Risk Management
§EFT Cloud Services – Gold Winner in Managed File Transfer
-Recognized for distinguished product achievements by Network Products Guide’s 2016 IT World Awards in several categories, including:
§The Workspaces module, a part of EFT – Gold Winner in BYOD Security
§EFT – Bronze Winner in Compliance
§Mail Express – Bronze Winner in Email Security and Management
-

Named by Computerworld as one of the best companies“Top 30 Most Valuable Companies to work forWatch in 2019” by CIO Bulletin. The publication selected Globalscape based on a number of factors, including its high-performance secure data exchange solutions, as well as the company's longevity and ability to grow and adapt.

-

Recognized in CV’s (Corporate Vision magazine) 2019 Corporate Excellence Awards as the “Best Enterprise File Transfer Solutions Provider 2019”.

In 2018:

-

Named to The Channel Company’s list of CRN Channel Chiefs as top leaders in the IT channel for the third5th consecutive year withyear.

-

Awarded a ranking of #3 in the small company category.

-
Recognized by the San Antonio Business Journal as a 2016 Best Place to Work, making this the fifth time GlobalSCAPE has received this honor.
-Honored as the HR Employer of the Year and Excellence in Engagement Strategy in North America by the HRO Today Services and Technology Association.
-Received a 5-Star5-star rating in The Channel Company’s 2018 CRN 2016 Partner Program Guide for the second year in a row.4th consecutive year.

-
Named by Texas Monthly magazine as one of the best companies to work for in Texas for the sixth year in a row with a ranking of #16 in the medium size category.
2


-Received Info Security Products Guide 2016 Global Excellence Awards for distinguished achievements in product innovation that included:
§EFT Workspaces – Gold Winner in BYOD Security.
§Enhanced File Transfer – Silver Winner in Compliance.
§EFT Cloud Services – Bronze Winner in Cloud Security.
§Mail Express – Bronze Winner in Email Security and Management.
-Named as Leader in Secure Information Exchange Services 2016 – Texas by the Corp America 2016 Small Cap Awards.

·In 2015:
-Listed as a Champion in the Ad-Hoc Mid-Market category and a Leader in the Ad-Hoc Enterprise use case by Info-Tech Research Group within its Managed File Transfer Vendor Landscape report. This is the second consecutive time that Info-Tech Research Group has named GlobalSCAPE a Champion within this report.
-
Named one of the best places to work in the information technologies small business category by Computerworld for the fourth time.
-
Named as one of San Antonio’s best places to work by the San Antonio Business Journal for the fifth time in the medium size category.
-Received a 5-Star rating in The Channel Company’s CRN 2015 Partner Program Guide.
-
Named by Texas Monthly magazine as one of the best companies to work for in Texas for the fifth year in a row with a ranking of #3 in the medium size category.
-
Named to the San Antonio Business Journal’s 2015 Fast Track list for companies with $10 million or more in revenue.
-
Named by the San Antonio Express News as the #1 Top Workplace for 2015 in the small company category, and recognized as one of the Top Workplaces for the fifth time.
-
Two members of the channel leadership team recognized as The Channel Company’s 2015 CRN Channel Chiefs.
-
Two channel team members named to The Channel Company’s 2015 CRN Women of the Channel list.
-Recognized by the Golden Bridge Business and Innovation Awards as a Gold Winner in the Managed File Transfer – Innovations category for EFT Workspaces.
-Recognized by the Info Security Products Guide’s Global Excellence Awards as a Gold Winner within the Compliance category for Enhanced File Transfer (EFT) and as a Bronze Winner within the Email Security and Management category for Mail Express.
-Recognized by the Network Products Guide awards as a Gold Winner in Compliance Data Centers for EFT v7.0 and a Silver Winner in Email, Security and Management with Mail Express v4.

GlobalSCAPE was incorporated in Delaware in 1996.  Our address is 4500 Lockhill-Selma Road, Suite 150, San Antonio, Texas 78249. Our phone number is (210) 308-8267.

Industry Background


Communication across private and public computer networks that facilitates the movement and sharing of information between central and remote locations and with associates, employees, partners, suppliers, and customersclients is an integral part of daily operations for enterprises of all sizes. Corporate information technology (IT) managers must protect business assets, ensure that policiesfollow strict regulatory and processes meet regulations governing the management of sensitive information,compliance guidelines and ensure that the right people have access to the right information, at the right place and at the right time. Global operations, diverse business partners and networks further emphasize the need for software applications that ensure compatibility, scalability, privacy, security and cost-effective integration.security. These requirements have created the need for maintaining the security of data and information in motion (for example, with traditional MFT solutions delivered as on-premises software or as a cloud service) and at rest (for example, through securely deleting or purging files or securely accessing stored data from mobile tablet or smartphone devices).


rest.

The increase in high-profile and large scalelarge-scale data breaches in corporate enterprises and government agencies involving access to information in an unauthorized manner have created a heightened awareness of the vulnerability of critical and confidential data. As a result, attention at an unprecedented level is being paid to the security and integrity of systems that store and transfer data electronically. In many cases, this emphasis involves assessing the adequacy of the security, reliability and visibility provided by existing MFT systems.

3


The need for secure MFT solutions is particularly strong for organizations faced with a daunting array of privacy, security, and remote accessibility challenges stemming from various regulatory and business requirements for data privacy and confidentiality. Regulatory requirements regarding privacy and privacy requirementssecurity include federal legislation and regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and the Federal Trade Commission Red Flags Rules, as well as state legislation and regulations in the U.S such as California Senate Bill (SB) 1386 and the data security regulations issued by the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business, as well as the extraterritorial requirements such asRules. In the European Union, the General Data Privacy Directive.Protection Regulation (GDPR) also places requirements on organizations who will have a need for our solutions. Some of these statutes and regulations impose severe penalties for improper disclosure of confidential information. IndustryIn addition to legal obligations, industry best-practices such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) and self-imposed business requirements lead to the need to secure and protect consumer information, intellectual property and trade secrets. Use of secure MFT solutions offeroffers protection against disclosure of proprietary information and also reducereduces corporate risks associated with the potentially devastating consequences of security breaches.


Our primary industry is known as managed file transfer. The MFT industry has its technical origin in the file transfer protocol, or FTP. FTP dates back to 1980 (RFC 765, later superseded by RFC 959), with even earlier RFCs guiding prior attempts to establish standards for file transfer protocols.1980. The use of file transfer protocols increased dramatically with the explosive growth of the Internet and the World Wide Web during the 1990s. The MFT industry arose from recognition that FTP alone does not provide adequate security and management capabilities for file transfers. MFT solutions offer a greater degree of security and control than FTP. Features available in MFT solutions include integrated security, auditing capabilities, performance monitoring, and reporting. The MFT industry includes low cost, or even free, solutions that offer basic capabilities. However, we believe businesses and even individuals require more advanced solutions that provide scalability, enhanced security options, automated workflow and dedicated maintenance and support, and other features that facilitate high-confidence, secure and cost effective file transfers.


support.

Cloud computing is a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned, released, and scaled to meet requirements.  We believe the continuing movement to cloud services is analogousa favorable trend that offers us increased opportunities to the telecommunications shift from dedicated point-to-point circuits to a delivery model in which the entire telecommunications infrastructure potentially can be used to establish, maintain,win clients and manage individual connections on an as-needed basis.expand our market presence.

3

Strategy


We intend to build upon our leadership position in the MFT market to provide businesses, other organizations and individual users with the solutions necessary to meet their growing need for secure information exchange. From our perspective, fully addressing this need for secure information exchange requires consideration of capabilities beyond traditional MFT, including the sharing of content between both people and businesses, work group collaboration, access to content outside the data center, business-to-business partner enablement, electronic data interchange, integration between systems and information, solution-wide governance, and advanced visibility including analytics, dashboards, and transaction-level control. We intend to use our EFT platform as a foundation for expanding our product offerings into areas adjacent to MFT that are often addressed and managed by the same decision-makers who purchase our EFT platform. Going forward, we intend to focus on determining which areas of our business will contribute to our future growth in their current state, need additional investment to contribute in the desired manner or require further analysis to determine their place in our product offerings.


As we evolve our solution portfolio, we intend to maintain an appropriate balance between legacy and new solutions, including making choices about transitioning, sustaining, or retiring solutions as necessary to best operate under prevailing business conditions. Transitioning or sustaining solutions may involve consolidating capabilities within our solution portfolio, releasing upgrades in response to market or customerclient needs, or making bug fixes. We also may phase out solutions and earlier versions of our solutions periodically in accordance with our end-of-live,end-of-life, or EOL, policy.


In addition to expanding our products into areas adjacent to MFT, we also believe that we need to continue to expand the means of delivering our MFT products. To that end, we intend to continue expanding our capability to deliver our MFT productsEFT platform through EFT Cloud Services which provides a flexible continuum of features and functions that gives the user the ability to pick and choose the extent to which they want to own or outsource the capabilities of our EFT platform.Arcus SaaS delivery model. EFT Cloud Services alsoArcus provides organizations the flexibility of deploying on-premises, in the cloud or in a hybrid cloud environment with all of the security, compliance, scalability, and visibility features of an on-premiseson-premise managed file transfer solution. We continually evolve our strategic focus based on our vision for product innovation and development, our assessment of visibility of and demand for our products in the marketplace, and our evaluation of desired approaches for selling and delivering our products. Our strategic focus consists of:  

4


·Ongoing

Continuing innovation of our EFT platform to address the expanding needs of our existing customersclients and to enhance our products’ appeal to new customers.clients.


·

Enhancing sales and marketing programs to improve identification of demand for our products and to increase revenue.

Licensing, developing and/or acquiring technologies with features and functions that are complementary to and synergistic with our EFT platform so as to expand the breadth of our products offerings.platform.


·Enhancing our sales and marketing programs to improve identification of potential demand for our products and to increase the rate at which we are successful in selling our products.

Ongoing Continuing Innovation of Our our EFT platform Platform to Address the Expanding Needs of Our our Existing Customers Clients and to Enhance Our our Products’ Appeal to New Customers.


Clients

We seek to continue to improve and enhance our core technology, primarily in the MFT space, in both breadth and depth.  By focusing on the breadth of the product, we seekespecially as it relates to pursue different segments of the market to ensure that we have offerings that meet the needs of small and medium businesses, or SMBs, but also scale to meet the demands of larger enterprises.existing clients. This willmay require new product features and packages to be released to these audiences.released. We believe that increasing the depth of our products by adding new features and product functionality, we will allow us to increase sales to our existing client baseclients by helping them solve additional problems within their organizations. ExamplesIt will also position us to attract new clients.

We believe clients in the markets we serve will increasingly begin assessing the viability of innovation in accessing and using MFT capabilities through cloud-based, SaaS offerings. EFT Arcus is designed to meet the needs of clients who wish to access MFT through a cloud delivery model.

Enhancing Sales and Marketing Programs to Improve Identification of Demand for our core technology for the 2016 fiscal year included EFT Workspaces, which permits end usersProducts and to collaborate more effectively in a peer-to-peer relationship without having to rely on central administrators,Increase Revenue

Sales and EFT Event Rule Enhancements, which expanded our capabilities with workflow optimization and enhanced automation.  Wemarketing efforts will continue to focus on enabling our core technologysalespeople and channel partners to ensure its continued success.


Gartner Inc., a notable industry analyst,successfully engage clients and International Data Corporation have statedprospects. We believe that the annual MFT market is in excessmuch of $700 million. We are a leader in MFTour new business will be attributable to current client relationships and we intend to continue to deepen these relationships. As we deepen our client relationships, we will seek to identify opportunities for additional deployments of our products and services. In 2015, 2013 and 2012, we achieved one

We provide solutions to some of the highest ratings inworld’s largest brokerage firms, manufacturers, oil companies, banks, insurance companies, healthcare providers, airlines, cruise ship operators and technology providers. Given the Managed File Transfer Vendor Landscape Report from Info-Tech Research Groupbreadth and depth of these market opportunities, we believe the effectiveness of a direct sales approach using only our in-house personnel to sell our products is limited by being designatedthe number of qualified sales people we can hire and the number of prospective clients to whom they can present our products. As a “Champion” in its Vendor Landscape report. Info-Tech Research Group evaluated criteria such as strategy, viability,result, we plan to continue emphasizing our third-party sales and support reach, and channel partner programs. Its evaluation of our strategy garnered one of the highest possible scores due in part to our focus on security and regulatory compliance. Also playing a role in our rating was the assessment of EFT Enterprise, our primary MFT platform. EFT Enterprise was commended for its ability to meet advanced security requirements, its flexible deployment options and modular architecture. In addition, we also were positioned in the Leader’s quadrant of the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Managed File Transfer in the latest years for which Gartner published this magic quadrant. We have since added adjacent-market capabilities, such as accelerated file transfer, business automation and business activity monitoring, to the EFT platform using our modular solution architecture. relationships.

We believe thatour channel sales program helps us establish and maintain a lower-touch delivery model through which we train these capabilities are helping underpin the consistent growth in revenue from the EFT platform since they enable additional salespartners to existing clientssell and enhance the appeal of our software solutions to prospective, new clients.


With MFT capabilities increasingly being integrated into B2B gateways, data integration, service oriented architecture, and other technical solutions, we believe that the need to keep evolvingdistribute our solutions and entering adjacent markets also is clear.provide them sales and marketing tools to support that effort. We continueutilize this approach to believereduce the market will shift toward considerationoverall cost of traditional MFT as more of a “feature” than a solution. This shift may take many years, but we believe early recognition of the trendmarketing and appropriate strategic planning increase our potential for evolvingselling our solutions in frontareas where it would be costly to establish a presence with our own employees.

4


The second

Another area of strategic focus continues with product innovation but extends beyond pure MFT into adjacent segments and technologies.  We have made investments to integrate the capabilities of products and technologies such as Mail Expressdata movement and scConnect into our EFT platform.data security. We willintend to continue to focus on determining which areas of our business will contribute to our future growth in their current state, need additional investment to contribute in the desired manner, or require further analysis to determine their future strategy.



Our solution portfolio may evolve over time, for example, through development of new offerings in adjacent markets or through acquisitions of technologies by licensing, partnering or by acquiring companies which own such technologies. We also maintain an activea research and development program and work closely with partners and others in the industry to identify new solution opportunities. We also intend to remain alert for attractive opportunities to collaborate with others or perhaps combine other revenue-producing technologies with ours to expand our product offerings and reach.


We have allocated significant resources in recent years to enhancing our existing products and developing new solutions. This strategic focus has resulted in us adding features and functions to our EFT platform products and enhancing our ability to deliver those products to our customers in a variety of ways ranging from an on-premise, perpetual license to a full SaaS offering.

While storing and accessing data in a cloud environment is viable in many circumstances, we believe there also is a significant demand in the marketplace for the ability to access data in a manner similar to that offered by cloud computing but with the data being accessed and stored within the security of computers, servers or data centers owned by or dedicated solely to a particular individual or enterprise, rather than in the cloud. We believe our secure content mobility products potentially can provide or contribute to that functionality. Therefore, we intend to continue to expand and enhance these capabilities.

As we evolve our solution portfolio, we intend to maintain an appropriate balance between legacy and new solutions, including making choices about transitioning, sustaining, or retiring solutions as necessary to best operate under prevailing business conditions. Transitioning or sustaining solutions may involve consolidating capabilities within our solution portfolio, releasing upgrades in response to market or customerclient needs, making bug fixes, or phasing-out solutions periodically.


Enhancingperiodically pursuant to our sales and marketing programsEOL policy.

We continue to explore all strategic alternatives to maximize value for shareholders, including without limitation to improve identification of potential demand for our productsthe market position and to increase the rate at which we are successful in selling our products.


We intend to sustain a high level of execution of our demand generation activities through our marketing group to provide a continuing flow of sales leads to our direct sales personnel and our channel sales partners.  We maintain lead generation programs that helped us to achieve the record revenues and bookings in 2016. During 2017, our sales and marketing efforts will continue to focus on enabling our channel partners and engaging their customers and prospects. We will continue to enhance our partner program to reward our partners who participate in our sales and technical certifications and drive new opportunities for us.  We believe that our marketing, sales and channel demand generation programs will continue to be a primary growth driver for GlobalSCAPE in 2016 and beyond.

We also intend to continue to emphasize ongoing initiatives to elevate our product and corporate profiles and awareness under the GlobalSCAPE brand. We believe that the transformationprofitability of our product lines into a more comprehensive solution architectureofferings in the marketplace, generate additional liquidity, and enhance our valuation. We may pursue our goals through organic growth, strategic initiatives or other alternatives. We will also continue to elevate this brand awareness with larger enterprises while still serving the needs of our traditional clients.  We will use internal resourcesmonitor capital markets for opportunities to repurchase shares, as well as outside marketing and communications professionalsconsider other actions designed to support this work.
We conduct business with thousands of organizations around the world. We provide solutions to some of the world’s largest manufacturers, distributors, banks, insurance companies, healthcare providers, automakers, film companies and technology providers. Given the breadth and depth of these market opportunities, we believe the effectiveness of a direct sales approach using only our in-house personnel to sell our products is limited by the number of qualified sales people we can hire and the number of prospective clients to whom they can present our products.  Accordingly, throughout 2016, we increased our emphasis on expanding our third-party sales channel relationships and intend to continue doing so for the foreseeable future.

We believe that utilizing and expanding our third-party sales channel relationships allows us to leverage the existing base of sales people in place in those companies and their existing customer relationships. In addition to exposing our products to hundreds, and potentially thousands, of sales people employed by those third-party resellers, our products can benefit from proven sales programs and methodologies in those organizations that are financed and supported by those selling partners.  We believe operating an aggressive channel reseller program provides an opportunity for our products to be presented to a notably larger number of potential buyers and in a more rapid fashion than if we attempted the same effort using only our direct salespersons.  We will continue to expand and enhance our existing channel relationships while at the same time identifying and engaging additional channel partners. Using this approach, we believe we can maintain and expand the exposure for our products in the marketplace in a manner that would probably take several years for us to accomplish on our own.

We believe this channel sales program helps us establish and maintain a lower-touch delivery model through which we train these partners to sell and distribute our solutions and provide them sales and marketing tools to support that effort. We utilize this approach to reduce our overall cost of marketing and selling our solutions in areas where it would be costly to establish a presence with our own employees. To facilitate this approach, we host channel partner conferences to provide a forum for exchanging ideas and delivering partner-specific sales education and training. Additionally, channel partners supplement our own demand generation efforts and provide access to client bases that previously would not have been available to us.
shareholder value.

Software Products and Services

 We develop and sell computer software that provides secure information exchange, file transfer and file sharing capabilities for enterprises and consumers. We have been in business for over twenty years and have sold our products to thousands of enterprises and more than one million individual consumers throughout the world.

Our primary business is selling and supporting MFT software for enterprises. MFT software facilitates the transfer of data from one location to another across a computer network within a single enterprise or between multiple computer networks in multiple enterprises. These transfers may be ongoing, repetitive activities executed by automated software routines that occur without human intervention, or they may be transfers that people create and complete in the absence of automated routines or as a result of ad-hoc, special situations that arise from time-to-time. Examples of enterprise-level activities that rely on MFT software include:


·

Transfer of transactional information within an enterprise on a repetitive basis from one geographic location to another, such as a transfer of deposit and withdrawal information throughout the day from a branch of a bank to a central data processing center at another location.

·

Movement of accumulated information within an enterprise from one data processing application to another on a periodic basis, such as a transfer of bi-weekly payroll information from a payroll system that is used to pay employees to a job cost system that is used to manage the cost of a project.

·

Exchange of information between enterprises to facilitate the completion of one or more business transactions, such as a retailer transmitting inventory purchasing requirements produced by its material requirements planning system to an order entry system at a supplying vendor.


We earn 98% of our revenue from the sale of MFT products and services that are part of our EFT platform. We have multiple revenue streams from our MFT productsthe EFT platform that include:


·

Perpetual software licenses under which customersclients pay us a one-time fee for the right to install our products in their information systems environment on computers they manage and either own or otherwise procure from a cloud services provider, including deploying our products at a cloud services provider in a bring-your-own-license, or BYOL, environment. Our brand name for this product is EFT. Historically, most of the revenue we have earned from our EFT platform products has been from sales of EFT perpetual software licenses and related M&S.

·

Cloud-based, hosted SaaS solutions that we sell on an ongoing subscription basis resulting inbasis. In January 2018, we introduced EFT Arcus, our earningSaaS offering of the EFT platform for which users pay a recurring,base monthly subscription fee to access the service.plus an additional variable amount based upon their metered usage of EFT Arcus resources.

·M&S.

Maintenance and Support.

·

Professional services for product customizationinstallation, integration and integration.training.

5

We also sell products that can be synergistic to our MFT products. These products have capabilities that:


·Support information sharing and exchange capabilities using traditional email systems.
·Enable enterprise file synchronization and sharing.
·Enhance the ability to replicate, share and backup files within a wide area network or local area network, thereby allowing users to access their data at higher speeds than possible with most alternate approaches.
·Support file transfers by individuals and small businesses.

We earn most of our revenue from the sale of our MFT products that support business-to-business activities and are strategically focusedfocus on selling our EFT platform products in thata business-to-business environment. The majority of ourthe resources that we will expend in the future for product research, and development, marketing and sales will concentratefocus on the MFT business-to-business market.this product line. We expect to expend minimal resources developing and selling our other products. We believe our EFT platform products and business capabilities are well-positioned to compete effectively in the market for these products. For a more comprehensive discussion of the products we sell and the services we offer, see below.

We sell other products that market.


Someare synergistic to our EFT platform including CuteFTP. Collectively, these products constituted less than 3% of our products support consumer-oriented file transfers and file sharing. Even thoughtotal revenue in 2019. Clients pay a one-time fee to purchase these products are profitable onunder a perpetual software license. Some clients also purchase an overall basis, we anticipate the future resources we will expend relatedM&S contract. We do not offer a SaaS version of these products and have no plans to products sold to consumers and the associated revenue we earn from those products willdo so. We continue to be a minor partoffer product support for Mail Express and WAFS, which we discontinued as products for sale as of our business.

January 1, 2019.

The following discussion following presents a summary description of our specific products and solutions.


Managed File Transfer – Enhanced File TransferTransfer–EFT Platform


Enhanced File Transfer, or

EFT is the brand name of our core MFT product platform. EFT was awarded multiple industry awards in compliance categories in 2016 including the 2016 Golden Bridge awards, the Network Product Guide’s 2016 IT World Awards, and the 2016 Info Security Products Guide Global Excellence Awards.


The EFT platform provides users the ability to securely transmit data from one location to another using any number of files of any size or configuration. It facilitates management, monitoring, and reporting on file transfers and delivers advanced data transfer workflow capabilities to move data and information into, out of, and throughout an enterprise. Notable

The EFT platform provides a common, scalable MFT environment that accommodates a broad family of accompanying modules to provide enterprises with increased security, automation, and performance when compared to traditional FTP-based and email delivery systems. Various optional modules allow users to select the solution configuration most applicable to their requirements for auditing and reporting, encryption, file transfers, operability in or through a DMZ network, and integration with back-end business processes, including workflow automation capabilities.

General features and capabilities of the EFT platform include:


·

State-of-the-art, enterprise-level security when transferring information within or between computer networks as well as for collaboration with business partners, customers,clients, and employees. EFT also provides automation that supports effective integration of back-end systems. It has built-in regulatory compliance, governance, and visibility controls to provide a means of safely maintaining information. EFT offers a high level of performance and scalability to support operational efficiency and maintain business continuity. Administrative tools are provided at various levels of granularity to allowprovide for complete control and monitoring of file transfer activities.

·

Transmission of critical information such as financial data, medical records, customerclient files, vendor files, personnel files, transaction activity, and other similar documents between diverse and geographically separated network infrastructures while supporting a range of information protection approaches to meet privacy, compliance and other security requirements. In addition to enabling the secure, flexible transmission of critical information using servers, desktop, and notebook computers and a wide range of network-enabled mobile devices, our products also provide customersclients with the ability to monitor and audit file transfer activities.

·

Compliance with government regulations and industry standards relating to the protection of information while allowing users to reduce information systems and technologies costs, increase efficiency, track and audit transactions, and automate processes. Our solutions also provide data replication, acceleration of file transfer, sharing/sharing and collaboration, and continuous data backup and recovery to our customers.recovery.


The

EFT platform provides a common, scalable MFT environment that accommodates a broad family of accompanying modules to provide enterprises with increased security, automation, and performance when compared to traditional FTP-based and e-mail delivery systems. Various, optional modules allow users to select the solution configuration most applicable to their requirements for auditing and reporting, encryption, ad hoc and web-based file transfers, operability in or through a DMZ network, and integration with back-end business processes, including workflow automation capabilities.


During 2015 and 2016, we released new versions of our EFT platform and new modules which added several enhancements and capabilities including:

·Advanced Authentication Module (AAM) that increases the interoperability of EFT with multiple authentication methods. AAM provides a single source of authentication across a customer’s infrastructure.
·Workspaces, which is a file-sharing module that allows employees to create their own groups and assign permissions for those groups, much like a virtual data room, to provide access to files for which they themselves have access on the EFT server.  This functionality is accomplished without compromising the security, control, and governance of those files.
·A Workspaces Outlook plugin that provides secure ad hoc file transfers via email, providing customers with the reporting features in EFT and combining them with the simplicity and security of sending files with Mail Express. The integration of these two products takes the best features in Mail Express and incorporates them into EFT.
·Accelerate, which is an accelerated file transfer module that boosts the speed and efficiency of secure data transfers and allows for the fast transfer of large files over disparate geographic distances.
·Enhanced compatibility of web transfer client file transfers through HTML5 support in addition to the existing Java Runtime Environment.
·Increased scalability and business continuity with more flexible, uninterrupted file transfer service.
·Improved facilitation of PCI DSS version 3.0 compliance with updates to security components, such as PGP and AS2.
·Enhanced and expanded event rule functionality which improves the ability to integrate our products with client business processes and backend systems.
We expect to continue to enhance the EFT platform with capabilities that improve its speed and responsiveness of performance, provide additional administration flexibility supporting cross-platform implementation with our DMZ Gateway solution, offer business activity monitoring, and provide additional language support.

Most EFT customers choose toPlatform – Delivery Offerings

Our clients can purchase a perpetual software license for a one-time fee paid at the time of purchase and under which they install the software on equipment they own and/or manage. In almost all cases, they also purchase ongoing M&S for which they pay us a recurring, annual amount that typically is 20% to 30% of the price of the software license.


If a customer prefers to use the capabilities of EFT in a SaaS fashion, we offer EFT Cloud Services for a monthly subscription fee. The EFT platform delivered in this manner has the same features and functionality as our EFT platform installed at a customer site. EFT Cloud Services allows users to reduce their upfront cost and achieve other recognized benefits of cloud-based managed file transfer SaaS subscription solutions, including strong service level agreements for information technologies infrastructure reliability and performance.  EFT can also be deployed for customers, on a BYOL basis, in their infrastructures running through Amazon Web Services or Microsoft AZURE. We have also initiated offering EFT Enterprise direct to buyers on a pre-deployed basis in the Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces.   

EFT Cloud Services provides a flexible continuum of features and functions that gives the user the ability to pick and choose the extent to which they want to own or outsource the capabilities of our EFT platform. platform in two ways:

Under a perpetual software license for which they pay a one-time fee and under which they typically install our product on computers they own and/or manage. The EFT platform purchased in this manner can also be used in a bring-your-own-license environment hosted by major cloud providers such as Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure. Almost all clients who initially purchase a perpetual license to use the EFT platform also purchase an M&S contract for which they pay us a recurring fee that is typically 20% to 30% of the perpetual license fee per year.

As a SaaS under which the client pays us monthly subscription and usage fees to access the capabilities of the EFT platform in the cloud. Our brand name for this product is EFT Arcus. We introduced this product in January 2018. We have not yet earned significant revenue from the SaaS offering of our EFT platform.

EFT Cloud Services gives organizations the flexibilityArcus

While we currently earn most of deploying on-premises,our EFT platform revenue from sales of perpetual licenses combined with an M&S contract, we recognize that a major shift toward a SaaS environment is underway in the cloud or inmarketplace. Key features of EFT Arcus include:

Consumption-based pricing that allows clients to pay only for the capacity and throughput they use.

No long-term contractual commitment.

Automatic scalability to accommodate varying workloads to mitigate concerns about capacity planning.

A single tenant environment that allows each client to have a private deployment.

On-the-fly upgrades.

Data encrypted while at rest.

A minimum service level commitment of 99.9%.

The features and functions of EFT Arcus are similar to those of our EFT Product delivered for on-premise installation.

We host and deploy EFT Arcus on Microsoft Azure. It provides clients with a hybrid cloud environmentglobal platform on which to use EFT Arcus and provides infrastructure security, compliance and redundancy features. Microsoft Azure provides clients with allgeo-redundant storage which replicates data to a secondary region that is geographically distant from the primary region.

For the first 24 to 36 months that a client subscribes to EFT Arcus, we believe that the cumulative cost of ownership will typically be less than the total cost of purchasing an EFT platform perpetual license combined with an M&S contract. Accordingly, we expect the revenue we earn during that period from an EFT Arcus client will be less than the revenue we would have earned from that same client during that same period if the client had purchased a perpetual license with an M&S contract. However, we believe thereafter and over the long term, the cumulative, recurring revenue stream we will earn from an EFT Arcus client will exceed what we would have otherwise earned from the sale of a perpetual license combined with an M&S contract.

Clients subscribing to EFT Arcus may deem that controls pertaining to EFT Arcus are relevant to their internal control over financial reporting. In that case, a client may request us to provide them our management description of a service organization’s system and a service auditor’s report on that description and on the suitability of the security, compliance, scalability,design and visibility featuresoperating effectiveness of an on-premises managed file transfer solution. Users of EFT Cloud Services have the optioncontrols (commonly referred to work with a variety of top hosting providers that best fit their needs. We offer flexible subscription pricing under one, two, and three-year contracts that can help our customers minimize or eliminate upfront capital expenditures and possibly reduce their ongoing operating costs. Subscription revenue from EFT Cloud Services is increasing but is not yet a material portion of the total revenue from our EFT platform.


Secure Information Sharing and Exchange Solution – Mail Express
Mail Express is a solution that provides secure information sharing and exchange capabilities leveraging traditional email workflow. It is a stand-alone product installed in a client-server environment that allows users to send and receive secure, encrypted e-mail and attachments of virtually unlimited size. Mail Express was a Bronze Winner in Email Security and Management by Network Products Guide’s 2016 IT World Awards.

To broaden the appeal and capabilities of Mail Express, we are developing functionality that integrates the features of Mail Express into the EFT platform. This integration will take the superior control, visibility and monitoring capabilities of the EFT platform and make them available to administrators and users in an email environment.  This integrated product will improve operational efficiency by providing a coordinated user interface through which data movement activities using both our EFT and Mail Express products can be managed.

Wide Area File Services Solution - WAFS
Our WAFS software product uses data synchronization to further enhance the ability to replicate, share and backup files within a wide area network or local area network, thereby allowing users to access their data at higher speeds than possible with most alternate approaches. The software uses byte-level differencing technology to update changes to files with minimal impact on network bandwidth while also ensuring that files are never overwritten, even if opened by other remote users. Other key features of WAFS include native file locking, replication to multiple locations simultaneously, adherence to access control list file permissions, and full UTF-8 support.

We will continue to offer WAFS as a stand-alone product and provide M&S servicesSOC Type 1 or SOC Type 2 report prescribed under SSAE 18 issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). Currently, we rely on our third-party service provider who hosts EFT Arcus for that report as it pertains to customers who purchased WAFScontrols they have in the past and who purchase it in the future.place. We do not expectpresently have this report in place with respect to expend significant resources incontrols that we design, implement and manage at GlobalSCAPE. We are currently assessing the future expanding the features and capabilitieswork necessary to provide such a report. The absence of WAFS.
this report could cause certain potential clients to choose not to subscribe to EFT Arcus.

File Transfer Solution for Consumers - CuteFTP


CuteFTP is our original product introduced in 1996. It is a file transfer program generally used by individuals and small businesses. It remains popular today and generates incremental revenue for us at a relatively low cost.


CuteFTP continues to have significant brand recognition in the market.  Our current CuteFTP Version 9 introduced several notable new features including:

·Support for Unicode (UTF-8) characters that allows greater international use.
·Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) support to facilitate collaboration between users in editing and managing documents and files stored on World Wide Web servers.

Version 9 simplified our CuteFTP product line by consolidating all the features of our previous multi-product CuteFTP product line for Windows operating systems into this single version. We continue to offer CuteFTP Version 3.1 software for Mac platforms. We believe current versions of CuteFTP appeal to users wanting features more robust than offered in free alternatives such that it will be a product competitive in the marketplace for the foreseeable future.

We will continue selling CuteFTP as a stand-alone product and providing M&S services to customersclients who purchased CuteFTP in the past and who purchase it in the future.future, but we will not invest significantly in marketing the product. We do not expect to expend significant resources in the future expanding the features and capabilities of CuteFTP.


Professional Services

We offer a range of professional services to complement our on-premises and SaaS solutions. These professional services include product customizationconfiguration and system integration, solution “quickstart”“Quickstart” implementations, business process and workflow refinement, policy development, education and training, and solution health checks. In addition, we may provide longer-term engineering services, including supporting multi-year contracts, if necessary, to support certain solution implementations and integrations. 

7

Maintenance and Support

We offer M&S contracts to licensees of all of our on-premise software products. These M&S contracts entitle the licensee to software upgrades and technical support services in accordance with the terms of our M&S contract.contract terms. Standard technical support services are provided via email and telephone during our regular business hours. For certain of our products, we offer a PlatinumPremier M&S contract which provides access to emergency technical assistance 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.


For our Arcus product, M&S is included in the subscription fee.

Most of our M&S contracts are for one year although we also sell multi-year contracts. M&S is purchased by substantially all buyers of our EFT platform products as well as by many customersclients who purchase our other products. Customers with M&SClients pay us a recurring,an annual amount that is typically 20% to 30% of the software license price. A majority of our customersclients with M&S contracts renew them each year.


Sales

In 2019, we earned 65% of our revenue from M&S contracts. Sustaining that revenue stream is dependent upon our ability to continue selling new licenses for which clients purchase M&S services and Marketing


We emphasize developing our direct sales staff and reseller channel to capture sales throughsustain a high level of individual attention to the customer.  We provide our sales staff and resellers with training and professional development opportunities to ensure they are capable of meeting the needs of our prospects and customers. These sales team development activities focus on technical and process-oriented topical areas to enhance their ability to identify prospects, best position our solutions and develop pipeline opportunities into sales.

We believe our reseller and distributor channel relationships allow us to leverage those third-party resources to increase our market penetration. We have established such relationships throughout the world and across industry lines. In particular, we are focused on growing our domestic reseller channel.

Our marketing efforts focus on building brand awareness and capturing demandrenewal rate for our solutions. We take a two-pronged approach that includes a blend of digital and channel marketing. Through our digital marketing initiatives, we have invested heavily in content syndication programming, resulting in outbound targeted campaigns that more effectively reach the right audience with white papers, case studies and competitor comparisons. We also conduct ongoing search-engine optimization techniques and Pay Per Click advertising to enhance our ranking for particular key words in search results of major search engines. We continue to invest in channel marketing through programs designed to recruit and enable our target partners in a manner that creates joint initiatives that drive demand through them for our products. In addition, we are using our technology to meet the customer where they are shopping with placement in the Amazon Web Services and Azure marketplaces.


Our corporate website is www.globalscape.com. It provides a variety of sales and marketing information for our enterprise solutions as well as an ability to purchase some of our products online. We continually update the design of our websites to be responsive to the evolving marketplace and to provide a more solution-oriented perspective of our business, improve site navigation and provide additional opportunities for visitors to contact us through the websites.
Customers
existing M&S contracts.

Clients

We have sold our solutions throughout the world to individuals and enterprises ranging from SMBs to Fortune 100 companies. In order to leverage the resources of third parties, we make our products available for purchase by end users through third-party, channel resellers even though those end users can also purchase those products directly from us. During 20162019 and 2015,2018, we earned a total of 37% and 35%, respectively, from resellers and approximately 14%16% and 11%14%, respectively of our revenue from such sales through our largest, third party,third-party channel reseller. Although we believe that we are not substantially dependent on this distributor, if it were to experience a significant disruption of its business or if our relationship with themit were to significantly deteriorate, it is possible that our ability to sell to end users would be, at least temporarily, negatively impacted. We believe that such termination would not have a material adverse effect on us because we have engaged, or believe that we would be able to engage, alternative distributors, resellers and other distribution channels to deliver our products to end-customersclients shortly following the termination of any agreement with any distributor.


We derive a significant portion of our revenue from risk averse and/or regulated commercial customersclients in North America and throughout the world. Our primary commercial vertical markets include finance, health care, energy, retail, manufacturing, and engineering. We also have a customerclient base in the local, state, and federal government spaces. We continue to pursue additional government business by leveraging our certifications and industry validations.

Seasonality

Our products are marketed to individuals, SMBs and large organizations. As a result of this mix within our customerclient base, we typically have not experienced significant seasonality in our sales other than a typical modest decline from time-to-time in first quarter sales as compared to sales in the preceding fourth quarter. We believe this sales profile is related to our continued growth as an enterprise solution provider operating in an environment where first quarter sales possibly slow as prospective customers begin to execute their business activities, including purchases of our solutions, in accordance with new-year budgets and plans.


As a result of customerclient buying patterns and the efforts of our sales force and channel partners7partners to meet or exceed their sales objectives, we have historically received a substantial portion of orders from our customersclients and generated a substantial portion of revenue during the last few weeks of each quarter. If a delay in an expected order for our products occurs near the end of a quarter thatthis could result in revenue we expected to earn in that period to bebeing delayed until a subsequent quarter.


Network and Equipment

We have contracted withconduct business through various Tier 1 internetInternet services providers. Our arrangements provide for redundancy in the event of a failure and for expansion of available bandwidth in the event there is a dramatic increase in demand. To protect critical customerclient data, our online shopping cart utilizes SSL encryption. We maintain technical and physical measures and procedures compliant with the PCI DSS. We use a certified Approved Scanning Vendor for security scans and PCI scan attestation.


We have dedicated servers on and off site and expansion plans in place to allow rapid and cost effective scalability. Our offsite servers and data backup procedures provide a warm backup to our onsite servers for contingency purposes. The backups are performed in accordance with our disaster recovery plan.

8

We rely on unrelated third parties to host on their computers our EFT Arcus product. We have contracts and/or service agreements in place with those third parties that we believe provide us the ability to continue delivering those products without interruption.

Research and Development

The technology industry is characterized by rapid technological change in computer hardware, operating systems and software. Our customers’ requirements and preferences rapidly evolve, as do their expectations of the performance of our software.

To keep pace with these changes,client and market demand, we maintain an ongoing program of new product development to remain competitive and to address demands in the marketplace for our products.



development.

Our internal software engineers are responsible for creating and building our software products. They do so by combining their expertise with input from our sales, marketing and product management groups as to market trends and needs. Our software engineers design and write software and manage its testing and quality assurance. We utilize third-party software developers both domestically and overseas working under our supervision to supplement our software engineers. Using these external software developers in a strategic manner allows us to access highly-skilledhighly skilled labor pools, maintain a 24-hour development schedule, decrease time to market, and minimize programming costs.


All phases of research and development, or R&D, including scope approval, functional and implementation design, object modeling and programming, are subject to extensive internal quality assurance testing. We maintain an ongoing focus on improving our quality assurance testing infrastructure and practices. Technical reporting and customerclient support feedback from customers confirm the continuing positive effect of our ongoing enhancement of research and development and quality assurance processes.


Our EFT Arcus product is hosted by third-party cloud services providers. We rely upon those third parties, such as Microsoft Azure, for the continued development and enhancement of their cloud services infrastructures on which our products are hosted. We do not perform significant research and development of cloud services infrastructures using our own personnel.

Our R&D expenditures profile has been as follows ($ in thousands):


  Year ending December 31, 
  2016  2015 
R&D expenditures capitalized $1,538  $1,967 
R&D expenditures expensed  2,539   2,562 
Total R&D expenditures $4,077  $4,529 

  

Year ending December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

R&D expensed

 $1,355  $1,883 

Capitalized software development costs

  1,074   1,276 

Total resources expensed for R&D

 $2,430  $3,159 

Our total R&D expenditures decreased 23% in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to fewer employed software engineers and technical personnel.

Total resources expended for R&D set forth above as total R&D expenditures serves to illustrate our total corporate efforts to improve our existing products and to develop new products regardless of whether or not our expenditures for those efforts were expensed or capitalized. Total resources expended for R&D is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for R&D expense and capitalized software development costs individually. While we believe the non-GAAP total resources expended for R&D amount provides useful supplemental information regarding our overall corporate product improvement and new product creation activities, there are limitations associated with the use of this non-GAAP measurement. Total resources expended for R&D is a non-GAAP measurementmeasure not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies since there is no standard for preparing this non-GAAP measurement.measure. As a result, this non-GAAP measurementmeasure of total resources expended for R&D has limitations and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, R&D expense and capitalized software development costcosts individually.


Substantially all of our R&D expenditures relate to our EFT platform products with a relatively minor level of these expenditures being related to our other products. We expect to increase our research and development activities in future years as we focus on improving our current products and introduce new products.

Competition

The managed file transfer software market sector is highly competitive, subject to rapid change, and significantly affected by new product introductions and other activities of market participants.

The software industry has limited barriers to entry. The availability of computing power with continually expanding performance at progressively lower prices contributes to the ease of market entry. The software market is characterized by vigorous competition in each of the vertical markets in which we compete both from existing competitors and by entry of new competitors with innovative technologies. Competition is increasingly enhanced by consolidation of companies with complementary products and technologies and the possibility that competitors in one vertical segment may enter other vertical segments that we serve. In addition, some

Some of our competitors in certain markets have greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than we do. Because of these and other factors, competitive conditions in these industries are likely to continue to intensify in the future. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced net revenue and profit margins and loss of market share, any of which could harm our business. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Operations” for further discussion of risks regarding competition.

9

We believe that our future results depend largely upon our ability to better serve customersclients and by offering new productsproduct enhancements whether by internal development or acquisition. We also believe we must continue to provide existing product offerings that compete favorably with respect to ease of use, reliability, performance, range of useful features, continuing product enhancements, reputation, price and training.



price.

There is limited information regarding the market shares of our solutions in their respective categories. ManySome of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, personnel, and other resources, as well as greater name recognition and a larger customerclient base than we do. Significant competition characterizes the markets for our traditional MFT products. We anticipate we will continue to face increasing pricing pressures from competitors in the future. Given that there are low barriers to entry into the software market and that the market is subject to rapid technological change, we believe that competition will persist and intensify in the future. For more discussion on the risks associated with our competition, see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations”.


EFT Small Business (EFT SMB) EditionPlatform Products. Our EFT SMB Edition competesEnterprise and EFT Arcus products compete against a number of secure, Windows-based FTP servers. We believe our primary competitors are products sold byIBM, GoAnywhere, Axway, Accellion, Ipswitch, BMC, Cleo, Acronis, Signiant, Serv-U, and JSCAPE. EFT SMB Edition hasWe believe the advantagefeatures and functions of leveragingour products are competitive with those of other MFT providers. In particular, we believe the successease of CuteFTP through product integration, offering proprietary extensionsinstallation and use of our products combined with a competitive price position us to the FTP protocol, and cross-marketing efforts to an existing customer base. EFT SMB Edition also benefits from being partcompete effectively.

We do not offer a Linux version of our EFT platform,platform. Accordingly, we do not compete in environments in which includes supplementary modules, including the DMZ Gateway solution, andclient needs an upgrade pathMFT product that operates in a Linux operating system environment.

Delivering MFT products through a cloud-based, SaaS offering is a rapidly evolving sector of the markets in which we compete. Many of our MFT competitors are also introducing SaaS products. The nature of the SaaS delivery model lowers the barriers to EFT Enterprise Edition.


EFT Enterprise Edition.  EFT Enterprise Edition competesentry into this market such that we expect competition in this area to intensify in the managed file transfer market.  We believe our primary competitors are Axway, Ipswitch, IBM, and Linoma. EFT Enterprise Edition has the advantage of being cost effective in its market and allowing customers to flexibly evolve their MFT implementation by procuring supplementary modules such as our DMZ Gateway and Advanced Workflow Engine solutions.

future.

CuteFTP. CuteFTP exists in a highly competitive environment with numerous FTP software utilities available on the Internet for both the personal and professional user. CuteFTP is positioned as one of the only secure FTP client programs that support a wide range of security standards related to the FTP protocol. We believe our primary competitors are consumer file transfer solutions sold by Ipswitch, Serv-U and Van Dyke Software, Inc. CuteFTP was an early Windows-based FTP client to market and historically has been among the most frequently downloaded FTP clients on popular download sites.


WAFS.  WAFS competes in the wide area file services/storage market.  We believe our primary competitors are Panzura and Peer Sync, each of which is delivering proprietary appliances.  We believe that WAFS has the advantage of being a software-only solution which leverages corporate infrastructure and minimizes the total cost of ownership.

Mail Express.  Mail Express competes in areas of the file transfer market associated with e-mail attachment offloading.  We believe our primary competitors are Leapfile, Zix, and Biscom.  Mail Express has the advantage of centralized policies for outbound file attachments and a transparent end-user experience, which allows for rapid customer deployments. Mail Express also has the benefit of integration with our most recent EFT release which provides customers with a more uniform administration experience for e-mail attachment offloading and traditional MFT operations.

Cloud-based Solutions for Secure Information Exchange. Our EFT Cloud solutions compete with MFT SaaS solutions.  We believe our primary competitors are Ipswitch, IBM  and Accellion.   EFT Cloud has the advantage of leveraging cost effective, secure hosting and cloud infrastructures, as well as management services provided by GlobalSCAPE experts.

Governmental Regulation

Export Control Regulations. All of our products are subject to U.S. export control laws and applicable foreign government import, export and/or use requirements. The level of control generally depends on the nature of the goods and services in question. For example, the level of control is impacted by the nature of the software and encryption incorporated into our products. Where controls apply, the export of our products may require an export license or authorization or that the transaction qualifies for a license exception or the equivalent and may also be subject to corresponding reporting requirements. For the export of some of our products, we may be subject to various post-shipment reporting requirements. Minimal U.S. export restrictions apply to all of our products, whether or not they perform encryption functions. Additionally, because we are a Department of Defense contractor, there are certain registration requirements that may be triggered by our sales. In addition, certain of our items and/or transactions may be subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) if our software or services are specifically designed or modified for defense purposes. Companies engaged in manufacturing or exporting ITAR-controlled goods and services (even if these companies do not export such items) are required to register with the U.S. State Department.



Enhancements to existing products may, and new products will, be subject to review under the Export Administration Act to determine what export classification they will receive. In light of the ongoing discussions regarding anti-terrorism legislation in the U.S. Congress, there continues to be discussions regarding the correct level of export control. Export regulations may be modified at any time. Modifications to the export regulations could reduce or eliminate our ability to export some or all of our products from the U.S. without a license in the future, which could put us at a disadvantage in competing for international sales compared to companies located outside of the U.S. that would not be subject to these restrictions. Modifications to the export regulations could prevent us from exporting our existing and future products in an unrestricted manner without a license or make it more difficult to receive the desired classification. If export regulations were to be modified in such a way, we may be put at a competitive disadvantage with respect to selling our products internationally. We are working on enhancing our systems to address the impact of these regulations on our products and services and understand the need to comply.  We will complete technical reviews on any new products that we acquire or develop that may be subject to these regulations before we can export them.

10

Privacy Laws. As our business evolves to incorporate more cloud and SaaS solutions, we will receive, transmit, and store a greater volume and diversity of information. As a result, we may be subject to various international, federal and Statestate regulations regarding the treatment and protection of personally identifying and other regulated information. Applicable laws may include, without limitation, U.S. federal laws and implementing regulations such as the GLBA and HIPAA, as well as state laws U.S. and state regulations, and international laws and regulations including the European Union General Data Privacy Directive.Protection Regulation, or the GDPR, which replaced the European Union Data Protection Directive in May 2018. Additionally, some of these laws have requirements on the transmittal of data from one jurisdiction to another. In the event our systems are compromised by an unauthorized party, many of these privacy laws require that we provide notices to our customersclients whose personally identifiable data we reasonably believe may have been compromised. Additionally, if we transfer data in violation of these laws, we could be subjected to substantial fines. To mitigate the risk of compromised information, we use encryption and other security to protect our databases.


We also have adopted policies to comply with the GDPR in the European Union.

Intellectual Property

We regard some of the features of our internal operations, our software, our brands and marketing message, and our documentation as proprietary and rely on copyright, patent, and trademark and service mark laws and trade secret protection, such as confidentiality procedures, contractual arrangements, non-disclosure agreements and other measures to protect our proprietary information. Our intellectual property is an important and valuable asset that enables us to gain recognition for our products, services, and technology and enhance our competitive position and market value.


As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees and independent contractors, resellers, and corporate partners. We enter into license or subscription services agreements with respect to our software, documentation, and other proprietary information. Our standard license agreements are transferable only in limited circumstances and have a perpetual term. Our subscription services agreements for our hosted and managed solutions restrict access and have a definite term. We also educate our employees on trade secret protection and employ measures to protect our facilities, equipment, and networks.


Our trademarks and copyrights are central to our business. We have the following trademarks in the United States:


·

GlobalSCAPE®, CuteFTP®, CuteFTP Pro®, CuteBackup®, DMZ Gateway®, EFT Cloud Services ®, GlobalSCAPE Securely Connected®, CuteSendIt® and Mail Express® are registered trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.  GlobalSCAPE.   

·

Secure FTP Server™, Wide Area File Services™, WAFS™, CDP™, Advanced Workflow Engine™, AWE™, EFT Server™, EFT Workspaces™, EFT Insight™, Enhanced File Transfer™, Enhanced File Transfer Server™, Secure Ad Hoc Transfer™, SAT™, EFT Server Enterprise™, Enhanced File Transfer Server Enterprise ™, Desktop Transfer Client™, DTC™, Mobile Transfer Client™, MTC™, Web Transfer Client™, Workspaces™, Accelerate™, WTC™, Content Integrity Control™, Advanced Authentication™, AAM™, and scConnect™ are trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. GlobalSCAPE. 

·TappIn® and design are registered trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.
·TappIn Secure Share ™, Social Share ™, Now Playing ™, and Enhanced A La Carte Playlist™, are trademarks of TappIn, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

In addition to the United States trademarks listed above, we have trademarks registered in Canada and the European Union for GlobalSCAPE. We have obtained United States copyright registrations for all but the most recent versions of our software applications. We have two patents in the United States.



Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products, which are licensed by the thousands and sold world-wide, is difficult. While we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy is a persistent problem. In selling our products, we rely primarily on click-wrap licenses which are not signed in writing by licensees and may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Additionally, our new offerings through Microsoft Azure require the platform to present the applicable licensing terms and if we cannot prove that a licensee received the intended notice of the license terms, we may have difficulty enforcing the applicable agreements. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. Companies in the software industry, and other patent and trademark holders seeking to profit from royalties in connection with grants of licenses, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have received, and may receive in the future, communications from third parties asserting that our products infringe, or may infringe, the proprietary rights of third parties, seeking damages resulting from such infringement or indicating that we may be required to obtain a license from or pay a royalty fromto, such third parties. For more discussion on the risks associated with our intellectual property, you should read the information under the caption “Risk Factors,” especially “Risks Related to Legal Uncertainty.Intellectual Property.

Our number of employees is as follows:


  March 1, 
Department 2017  2016 
Sales and Marketing  47   46 
Engineering  33   25 
Professional Services  14   14 
Customer Support  20   22 
Management and Administration  19   19 
Total  133   126 

Nonefollows:

  

March 1,

 

Department

 

2020

  

2019

 

Sales and Marketing

  41   38 

Engineering

  13   9 

Professional Services

  6   6 

Customer Support

  22   22 

Management and Administration

  18   17 

Total

  100   92 

On August 3, 2018, we implemented a plan to restructure our organization, which included a reduction in workforce of approximately 40 employees, representing approximately 30% of the Company’s total pre-restructuring workforce. We recorded a charge of $381,000 in the third quarter of 2018 relating to this reduction in force, consisting primarily of one-time severance payments and termination benefits. The Company’s goal in the restructuring is to better focus our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believeworkforce on retaining current clients, gaining incremental business from current clients, and winning new business in the market segments where we can leverage our employee relations are good.


expertise and long history as an EFT pioneer.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference room. The SEC maintains an internetInternet web site that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information that issuers (including GlobalSCAPE) file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s web site is www.sec.gov. Our Annual ReportReports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other reports and amendments filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC are available free of charge on our web site at www.globalscape.com in the Investor Relations section as soon as practicable after such reports are filed. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-KAnnual Report and should not be considered part of this reportAnnual Report or any other filing that we make with the SEC.


ItemItem 1A. Risk Factors

We have described below risks we are aware of that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results of operations and financial condition and the value of our stock owned by our stockholders.


Risks Related to Our Operations

A significant portion of our revenue is generated through maintenance and support services. Decreases in maintenance and support sales or renewal rates, or a decrease in the number of new licenses we sell, will negatively impact our future revenue and financial results.

Revenue from maintenance and support services, or M&S, comprised 65% and 63% of our total revenue in 2019 and 2018, respectively. We earn M&S revenue from new M&S contracts, typically sold with new software licenses, and from renewals of such contracts. Any reduction in the number of new software licenses that we sell, or a reduction in sales of associated initial M&S contracts, therefore may have a long-term negative impact on our future M&S revenue, even if our clients continue to renew M&S contracts at historical rates. This situation, in turn, would impact our business and harm our financial results.

Our clients have no obligation to purchase M&S with their initial software license or to renew their M&S contract after the expiration of their initial M&S period, which is typically one year, but may also be for two or three years. Our clients’ purchases of M&S, and our renewal rates, may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the overall global economy, the health of their businesses, client dissatisfaction with our products’ functionality, features or performance, the level and quality of our M&S services, or pricing, and the perceived value of the M&S program. Renewal rates may also change due to competitors’ product offerings, clients converting to in-house developed solutions, clients’ inability to continue their operations and spending levels, migration path issues for new versions of our products, and other factors, a number of which are beyond our control. If our clients do not purchase M&S with their initial software license or do not renew their M&S contract for our products, our M&S revenue will decline, and our financial results will suffer. In addition, clients are generally entitled to a reduced annual maintenance fees for entering into long-term maintenance contracts, i.e. those contracts with a term longer than one year. Declines in our license sales, increases in the proportion of long-term maintenance contracts and/or increased discounting could lead to declines in our M&S revenue growth rates. Should clients migrate away from systems and applications which our products support, utilize alternatives to our products, including solutions offering free maintenance, or become dissatisfied with our maintenance services, increased cancellations could lead to declines in our maintenance revenue.

If we are unable to develop, offer and deliver new and enhanced products and services that achieve widespread market acceptance, or if we are unable to continually improve the performance, features, and reliability of our existing products and services, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We believe our industry will continue to evolve in response to continued adoption of mobile devices, acceptance of cloud-based SaaS products, and the growth of big data. In response, we have devoted resources to the development of new solutions, such as our SaaS solutions. We are making such investments through our internal efforts, including further development and enhancement of our existing products. We may also make acquisitions of new product lines. Innovation, new product development or acquisition, and go-to-market activities involve a significant commitment of time and resources and are subject to a number of risks and challenges including:

Developing, sustaining, and appropriately leveraging market intelligence to identify areas of market need that offer attractive return on investment.

Managing the length of the development cycle for new products and product enhancements which may be longer than originally expected.

Adapting to emerging industry standards and to technological developments.

Addressing the evolution of operating systems and industry platforms that presently may not be served by our existing products.

Entering new or unproven markets with which we have limited experience.

Managing new product and service strategies, including integrating our various security and file replication technologies, management solutions, client service, and support into unified enterprise security and file replication solutions.

Incorporating products and technologies acquired through mergers, acquisitions or other relationships with third parties.

Developing or expanding efficient sales channels.

Obtaining sufficient licenses to technology and technical access from operating system software vendors on reasonable terms to enable the development and deployment of interoperable products, including source code licenses for certain products with deep technical integration into operating systems.

Changing purchasing trends such as purchasing through on-line marketplaces rather than through direct sales or traditional channels.

Investments in new products may not result in sufficient revenue generation to justify their costs or may cause short or long-term harm to our financial results. For example, client adoption of our SaaS products has not occurred as rapidly as anticipated, or competitors may introduce new products and services that achieve acceptance among our current clients thereby adversely affecting our competitive position, or we may not be successful in future attempts to achieve disruptive innovation.

Our executive management team must act quickly, continuously and with vision due to the rapid speed of changing client expectations and advancement of technology inherent in the software industry, the extensive and complex efforts required to create useful and widely accepted products, the rapid evolution of cloud computing, mobile devices, new computing platforms, and the creation of other new technologies. Although we have adopted a strategy that we believe will fulfill these challenges, if we fail to internalize and execute properly on that strategy or adapt that strategy as market conditions evolve, we may fail to meet our clients’ expectations, fail to compete with our competitors’ products and technology, and lose the confidence of our channel partners and employees. Such circumstances could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

We earn most of our revenue and operating margins from our Enhanced File Transfer licensed software solution suite and related maintenance and support services and, as a result, are highly dependent upon the continued success of this product line.

Our Enhanced File Transfer product platform, or EFT platform, is our MFT solution targeted primarily to the enterprise and small and medium business user environments. Our clients may purchase EFT as an on-premise license or may subscribe to it as SaaS. License (both on-premise and SaaS), M&S, and professional services revenue from this product line was responsible for 98% and 96% of our total revenue in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Our EFT product has provided substantially all of our recent revenue growth and most of the operating margin necessary to fund our operations including, most notably, our sales and marketing and research and development activities. Declines and variability in demand for our EFT products could occur as a result of:

Improved products or product versions being offered by competitors in our markets.

Competitive pricing pressures.

Failure to release new or enhanced versions of the EFT solution on a timely basis or at all.

Technological changes that we are unable to address with file transfer products or that change the way enterprises utilize our products.

General economic conditions.

Due to our product concentration, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows would be adversely affected by a decline in demand for the EFT solution suite.

We rely on third parties to provide us with a number of operational services, including hosting and delivery of our SaaS products, certain of our client support services, and other operations. Any interruption or delay in service from these third parties, breaches of security or privacy, or failures in data collection could expose us to liability, harm our reputation and adversely impact our financial performance.

We rely on hosted computer services from third parties for certain services that we provide our clients. As we gather client data and host certain client data in third-party facilities, a security breach could compromise the integrity or availability or result in the theft of client data. In addition, our operations could be negatively affected in the event of a security breach, and we could be subject to the loss or theft of confidential or proprietary information.

Unauthorized access to this data may be obtained through break-ins, breach of our secure network by an unauthorized party, employee theft or misuse, or other misconduct. We rely on a number of third-party suppliers in the operation of our business for the provisioning of various services and materials that we use in the production of our products. Although we seek to diversify our third-party suppliers, we may from time to time rely on a single or limited number of suppliers, or upon suppliers in a single country, for these services or materials. The inability of such third parties to satisfy our requirements could disrupt our business operations or make it more difficult for us to implement our business strategy. If any of these situations were to occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could be subject to third-party liability, including under data protection and privacy laws in certain jurisdictions, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.

If we are unable to generate significant volumes of sales leads from our various marketing and demand generation efforts, then our revenue may not grow as expected or may decline.


We may generate leads through various marketing activities such as targeted email campaigns, attending networking-based trade shows, purchasing information and services from third-party experts in generating leads, and hosting webinars on enterprise IT management issues. Our marketing efforts may be unsuccessful, resulting in fewer sales leads. If we fail to generate a sufficient volume of leads from these activities and/or such sales leads do not result in actual sales, our revenue may not grow as expected or could decrease and our operating results could suffer.



Some of our sales leads are generated through visits to our websites by potential end-users interested in purchasing or downloading evaluations of our products. Many of these potential end-users find our websites by searching for secure file transfer products through Internet search engines, such as Google. A critical factor in attracting potential customersclients to our websites is how prominently our websites are displayed in response to search inquiries. If we are listed less prominently or fail to appear in search result listings for any reason, visits to our websites by customersclients and potential customersclients could decline significantly. We may not be able to replace this traffic, and, if we attempt to replace this traffic, we may be required to increase our sales and marketing expenses, which may not be offset by additional revenue and could adversely affect our operating results.


We rely heavily on third-party services providers to help us identify sales leads. If those service providers become unavailable to us, or if the cost of their services become more costly than we could afford to pay, our ability to generate a sufficient volume of sales leads could be compromised, and our ability to sustain or increase our revenue could be adversely affected.

A significant portion of our revenue is generated through maintenance and support services. Decreases in maintenance and support sales or renewal rates, or a decrease in the number of new licenses we sell, will negatively impact our future revenue and financial results.

Revenue from maintenance and support services, or M&S, we provide our customers comprised 56% and 54% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. We earn M&S revenue from new M&S contracts, typically sold with new software licenses, and from renewals of such contracts. Any reduction in the number of new software licenses that we sell, or a reduction in sales of associated initial M&S contracts, therefore may have a long-term negative impact on our future M&S revenue, even if our customers continue to renew M&S contracts at historical rates. This situation, in turn, would impact our business and harm our financial results.

Our customers have no obligation to purchase M&S with their initial software license or renew their M&S contract after the expiration of their initial M&S period, which is typically one year, but may also be for two or three years.  Our customers’ purchases of M&S, and our renewal rates, may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the overall global economy, the health of their businesses, and the perceived value of the M&S program.  If our customers do not purchase M&S with their initial software license or do not renew their M&S contract for our products, our M&S revenue will decline and our financial results will suffer.  In addition, customers are generally entitled to reduced annual maintenance fees for entering into long-term maintenance contracts, i.e. those contracts with a term longer than one year. Declines in our license bookings, increases in the proportion of long-term maintenance contracts and/or increased discounting could lead to declines in our M&S revenue growth rates. Should customers migrate away from systems and applications which our products support, utilize alternatives to our products, including solutions offering free maintenance, or become dissatisfied with our maintenance services, increased cancellations could lead to declines in our maintenance revenue.

Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly.


Our results of operations may fluctuate, in part, because of the resource intensive nature of our sales efforts, the length and variability of our sales cycle, and the short-term difficulty in adjusting our operating expenses. Our results of operations depend in part on sales to large organizations. The length of our sales cycle, from proof of concept to delivery of and payment for our products, is typically three to nine months but can be more than a year. If our competitors offer or develop products that our prospective customersclients may want to compare to our products, that situation could cause our average sales cycle to become longer. Because the length of time required to close a sale varies substantially from customerclient to customer,client, it is difficult to accurately predict when, or even if, we will make a sale to a potential customer.client. As a result, large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in periods subsequent to those periods in which we anticipated they would occur or have not occurred at all. The loss or delay of one or more large transactions in a period could impact our results of operations for that period and any future periods for which revenue from that transaction is delayed. As a result of these factors, it is difficult for us to forecast accurately our revenue for any particular period in the future. Because a substantial portion of our expenses are relatively fixed in the short term, our results of operations will suffer if our revenue falls below expectations in a particular period, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline.



Our business and growth depend on our ability to obtain M&S renewals from existing customers. A decline in the percent of our M&S contracts that are renewed could adversely affect our future operating results.

A substantial portion of our quarterly M&S revenue is attributable to M&S agreements entered into during previous periods.  As a result, if there is a decline in the renewal rate of M&S agreements in any particular period, it is possible that only a small portion of the decline will be reflected in our M&S revenue recognized in that period and the remainder will be reflected in our M&S revenue recognized in subsequent periods. Our customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors including customer dissatisfaction with our products’ functionality, features or performance, the level and quality of our M&S services, or our pricing. Renewal rates may also change due to competitors’ product offerings, customers converting to in-house developed solutions, customers’ inability to continue their operations and spending levels, migration path issues for new versions of our products, and other factors, a number of which are beyond our control. Our customers have no obligation to renew their M&S after the expiration of the initial term, and they may elect not to renew their M&S or to reduce the product quantity covered under their M&S agreements, thereby potentially reducing our future revenue. A decline in the renewal rate of M&S agreements may also result in a decrease in deferred revenue on our balance sheet as of the end of the period in which the decline in renewals occurred which, in turn, could result in a decrease in our future revenue.  For more information, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

We earn most of our revenue and operating margins from our Enhanced File Transfer licensed software solution suite and related maintenance and support services and, as a result, are highly dependent upon the continued success of this product line.

Our Enhanced File Transfer product platform, or EFT platform, is our on-premises, MFT solutions targeted primarily to the enterprise and small and medium business user environments. Our customers may purchase EFT as an on-premise license or may subscribe to it as software-as-a-service (or SaaS). License (both on-premise and SaaS), M&S, and professional services revenue from this product line was responsible for 93% and 90% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. This product has provided substantially all of our recent revenue growth and most of the operating margin necessary to fund our operations including, most notably, our sales and marketing and research and development activities.  Declines and variability in demand for our EFT products could occur as a result of:

Improved products or product versions being offered by competitors in our markets.

Competitive pricing pressures.

Failure to release new or enhanced versions of the EFT solution on a timely basis or at all.

Technological change that we are unable to address with file transfer products or that changes the way enterprises utilize our products.

General economic conditions.

Due to our product concentration, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows would be adversely affected by a decline in demand for the EFT solution suite.

We may acquire new products, capabilities or entire business enterprises in the future that could give rise to risks and challenges that could adversely affect our future financial results.


Acquisitions of new products, capabilities or entire business enterprises involve a number of risks and challenges, including:


·

Complexity, time, and costs associated with integration of the acquired business operations, workforce, products, and technologies into our existing business, sales force, employee base, product lines, marketing and technology which ultimately may not be successful.


·

Diversion of management time and attention from our existing business and other business opportunities throughout the integration.


·

Potential loss or termination of employees, including costs associated with the termination or replacement of those employees.



·

Assumption of debt or other liabilities of the acquired business, including any future litigation related to alleged liabilities of the acquired business.


·

The incurrence of additional acquisition-related debt as well as increased expenses and working capital requirements.


·

Potential dilution of earnings per share.


·

Increased costs and efforts in connection with compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.Act of 2002.


·

Potentially substantial accounting charges for restructuring and related expenses, write-off of in-process research and development, impairment of goodwill, amortization of intangible assets, and share-based compensation expense.


The ongoing integration of any acquired products, capabilities or entire business enterprises involves continually determining and leveraging the actual market synergies, sustaining and even extending the business performance of the acquired entity, implementing our technology systems in the acquired operations, and integrating and managing the personnel related to the acquired products and/or operations. We also must continue to effectively integrate the different cultures of acquired business organizations into our own culture in a way that aligns various interests.

15

Any of the foregoing, and other factors, could harm our ability to achieve anticipated levels of financial performance or to realize other anticipated benefits of an acquisition. In addition, because acquisitions of technology-based products and companies are inherently risky, no assurance can be given that our previous, current, or future acquisitions will be successful and will not adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition.


Our ability to sell our products is highly dependent on the quality of our support and services offerings. Our failure to offer high-quality support and services could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations.


Once our products are deployed for use by our end customers,clients, our end customersclients may depend on our support organization and our channel partners to resolve issues relating to our products. High-quality support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of our products. If we or our channel partners do not assist our end customersclients in deploying our products effectively, succeed in helping our customersclients resolve post-deployment issues quickly, or provide ongoing support, it could adversely affect our ability to sell our products to existing end customersclients and could harm our reputation with other potential end customers.reputation. As we expand our operations internationally, our support organization will face additional challenges, including those associated with delivering support, training and documentation in languages other than English. Our failure or the failure of our channel partners to maintain high-quality support and services could have a material and adverse effect on our business and operating results.

The transition from an on-premise to a cloud-based, SaaS subscription business model is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. 

We believe some clients and potential purchasers of our products are evaluating MFT via the cloud. Some will choose to embrace cloud delivery as a complete MFT solution or possibly employ a hybrid architecture. This potential shift in client preferences, and our pursuit of a SaaS strategy, may give rise to a number of risks, including the following:

If clients are uncomfortable with cloud-based solutions and desire only perpetual licenses, we may experience longer than anticipated sales cycles and sales of our cloud-based solutions may lag behind our expectations;

Our cloud-based strategy may raise concerns among our client base, including concerns regarding changes to pricing over time, service availability, information security of a cloud-based solution and access to files while offline or once a subscription has expired;

We may be unsuccessful in maintaining our target pricing, adoption and projected renewal rates;

We may select a target price that is not optimal and could negatively affect our sales or earnings; and

We may incur costs at a higher than forecasted rate as we expand our cloud-based solutions.

The potential shift of our clients’ preference to cloud-based, SaaS solutions may also require a considerable investment of technical, financial, legal and sales resources, and a scalable organization. Market acceptance of such offerings is affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to: security, reliability, scalability, customization, performance, current license terms, client preference, client concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage their data, public concerns regarding privacy and the enactment of restrictive laws or regulations.

If we are unable to successfully establish our cloud-based solutions and navigate our business model transition in light of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Cloud-based computing trends present competitive and execution risks.

Clients are transitioning to a hybrid computing environment utilizing various cloud-based software and services accessed via various smart client devices. Pricing and delivery models are evolving, and our competitors are developing and deploying cloud-based services for clients. We are devoting resources to develop and deploy our own competing cloud-based software and services strategies. While we believe our expertise and investments in software for cloud-based services provide us with a strong foundation to compete, it is uncertain whether our strategies will attract the clients or generate the revenue required to be successful. Delivering our products through cloud-based, SaaS solutions requires that we pay third parties, such as Microsoft Azure, to host our products and make them available to our clients. As a result, we incur ongoing, recurring third-party hosting expenses associated with delivering SaaS solutions that we do not incur with respect to our on-premise license products. These expenses may cause the gross margin we realized from our SaaS software products to be lower than the gross margin we realized from our on-premises software products. Whether we are successful in this new business model depends on our execution in a number of areas, including:

Continuing to innovate and bring to market compelling cloud-based services that generate increasing traffic and market share;

Maintaining the utility, compatibility and performance of our software on the growing array of cloud computing platforms and the enhanced interoperability requirements associated with orchestration of cloud computing environments; and

Successfully deploying our SaaS products on platforms hosted by third-party services upon which we rely for delivery of those computing solutions to our clients.

These new business models may reduce our revenues or operating margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We must keep up with rapid and ongoing technological change to remain competitive in the rapidly evolving cloud-based technology industry.

The cloud-based technology industry is characterized by rapid and ongoing technological change, frequent new product and service introductions, and evolving industry standards. Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt quickly to rapidly changing technologies, to adapt our solutions to evolving industry standards and to improve the performance and reliability of our applications and services. To maintain and increase market acceptance of our applications and services, we must anticipate client needs and offer solutions that meet changing demands quickly and effectively. Clients may require features and functionality that our current applications and services do not have or that our platforms are not able to support. If we fail to develop solutions that satisfy client preferences in a timely and cost-effective manner, our ability to renew our agreements with existing clients and our ability to increase demand for our solutions will be harmed.

If we are required to, and fail to successfully manage any changes to our business model, including the transition of our products to cloud offerings, our results of operations could be harmed.

We are beginning to transition from an on-premise to a cloud-based, SaaS subscription business model. This adjustment to our business model requires a considerable investment of technical, financial, legal and sales resources. Our transition to cloud offerings will continue to divert resources and increase costs, especially in cost of license and other revenues, in any given period. Such investments may not improve our long-term growth and results of operations. Further, the increase in some costs associated with our cloud services may be difficult to predict over time, especially in light of our lack of historical experience with the costs of delivering cloud-based versions of our applications. We may assume greater responsibilities for implementation related services during this transition. As a result, we may face risks associated with new and complex implementations, the cost of which may differ from original estimates. The consequences in such circumstances could include monetary credits for current or future service engagements, reduced fees for additional product sales, and a client’s refusal to pay its contractually obligated subscription or service fees.

Offering cloud services may result in the loss of other business opportunities and negatively impact our revenue growth.

We have allocated resources related to our sales and marketing activities, software product development, management team and other personnel toward growing our cloud business. This strategic direction and redirection of resources could potentially result in the loss of sales opportunities in our traditional perpetual license and M&S sales business. If our cloud business does not grow in accordance with our expectations and we are not able to cover the shortfall with other sales opportunities, then our business could be harmed. Although the subscription model used for our cloud business is designed to create a recurring revenue stream that is more predictable, the shift to this model may reduce our license sales, spread revenue over a longer period and negatively affect future license and M&S sales revenue.

Subscription offerings create risks related to the timing of revenue recognition.

Although the subscription model is designed to increase the number of clients who purchase our products and services and create a recurring revenue stream that is more predictable, it creates certain risks related to the timing of revenue recognition and potential reductions in cash flows.

A decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any period may not be immediately reflected in our reported financial results for that period but may result in a decline in our revenue in future periods. If we were to experience significant downturns in subscription sales and renewal rates, our reported financial results might not reflect such downturns until future periods. Our subscription model could also make it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenues from subscription or SaaS-based services through additional sales in any period as revenue from new clients will be recognized over the applicable subscription term. Increases in sales under our subscription sales model could result in decreased revenues over the short term if they are offset by a decline in sales from perpetual license clients.

Our cloud and SaaS offerings bring additional business and operational risks.

We offer delivery of several of our products using a SaaS model. Our SaaS offerings provide our clients with existing and new software management through a cloud service as opposed to traditional on-premises software deployments. There can be no assurance that SaaS revenue will be significant in the future despite our levels of investment in developing this product delivery method. Margins associated with our SaaS offerings are generally lower than margins associated with our on-premises solutions.

SaaS subscription agreements have a cancellation provision provided the client provides a thirty-day notice. Accordingly, our clients generally have no long-term obligation to us and may cancel their SaaS subscription at any time. Even if our clients are satisfied with our SaaS products and services, they may elect not to continue their SaaS subscription. Renewal rates in the future may differ from historical trends such that we may not be able to accurately predict client renewal rates. Our clients’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including their level of satisfaction with our services and their ability to continue their operations and spending levels. If we experience a decline in the renewal rates for our clients or they opt for lower-priced editions of our offerings or fewer subscriptions, our operating results may be adversely impacted.

There is a risk that we could find it difficult or costly to support both traditional software installed by clients and software delivered as a service. To the extent that our SaaS offerings are defective or there are disruptions to our services, demand for our SaaS offerings could diminish, and we could be subject to substantial liability.

Interruptions or delays in service from our third-party service delivery hosts could impair the delivery of our services and harm our business. If we or our third-party service delivery hosts experience security breaches and unauthorized access is obtained to a client’s data or our data, our services may be perceived as not being secure, clients may curtail or stop using our services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure and liabilities.

SaaS software solutions can be complex, and the deployment of our secure file transfer solutions in the desired manner may require additional professional services and implementation services for which we may not have the ability to provide at an appropriate margin. Our SaaS products are dependent upon third-party hardware, software and hosting vendors, all of which must interoperate for end users to achieve their computing goals. We expect other companies to enter this market and to introduce their own initiatives that may compete with, or not be compatible with, our cloud solutions.

If any of these events were to occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

If we fail to manage our sales and distribution channels effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected.


We sell our software products both directly to end-users and through a network of distributors and resellers that we collectively refer to as the channel, andas well as through marketplaces such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft AZURE.Azure. Sales through these different channelsmethods involve distinct risks. Risks associated with direct sales include:


·

Challenges in scaling the size of the direct sales team to levels required for revenue growth.


·

Difficulty in hiring, retaining, and motivating our direct sales force.


·

Substantial amounts of training for sales representatives to become productive, including regular updates to cover new and revised products.


·

Leads obtained from paid advertising (for example, Google ads) impacting direct sales should the marketing and advertising effectiveness decline due to non-attributable declines in leads, unforeseen search engine algorithm changes, or other occurrences that may adversely impact the lead generation aspects of the direct sales cycle.  Increased competition may materially impact the costs associated with such marketing and advertising.



From time-to-time, we make significant changes in the organizational structure and compensation plans of our sales organization, which may increase the risk of sales personnel turnover. To the extent that we experience turnover within our direct sales force or sales management, there is a risk that the productivity of our sales force would be negatively impacted which could lead to revenue declines. Turnover within our sales force can cause disruption in sales cycles leading to delay or loss of business. It can take time to implement new sales management plans and to effectively recruit and train new sales representatives. We review and modify our compensation plans for the sales organization periodically. Changes to our sales compensation plans could make it difficult for us to attract and retain top sales talent.


Sales through third-party distributors and resellers involve a number of risks, including:


Our lack of control over the timing of delivery of our products to end-users;our clients.


Our resellers and distributors currently not being subject to minimum sales requirements or any obligation to market our products to their customers;clients.


Our reseller and distributor agreements generally being nonexclusive and terminable at any time without cause; andcause.


Our resellers and distributors frequently marketing and distributing competing products and, from time to time, placing greater emphasis on the sale of these products due to pricing, promotions, and other terms offered by our competitors.


For 20162019 and 2015,2018, approximately 38%37% and 34%, respectively,35% of our revenue was derived from indirect channel sales through distributors and resellers.resellers, respectively. We expect that a significant portion of our revenue will continue to be derived from indirect channel sales in the future. Our ability to effectively distribute our products through those channels depends in part upon the financial and business condition of our distributor and reseller network. Computer software distributors and resellers typically are not highly capitalized, have previously experienced difficulties during times of economic contraction, and have experienced difficulties during the past several years. If our distributors and resellers were not be able to sustain their business at a level necessary to sell our products or provide customerclient support services, our business and revenue could be negatively impacted.


We rely upon major distributors and resellers in both the U.S. and international regions. Our largest distributor accounted for 14%16% and 11%14% of our total revenues in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Although we believe that we are not substantially dependent on this distributor, if it were to experience a significant disruption with its business or if our relationship with it were to significantly deteriorate, it is possible that our ability to sell to end usersour clients would be, at least temporarily, negatively impacted. This could, in turn, negatively impact our financial results.


Over time, we have modified and will continue to modify aspects of our relationship with our distributors and resellers, such as their incentive programs, pricing to them and our distribution model, to motivate and reward them for aligning their businesses with our strategy and business objectives. Changes in these relationships and underlying programs could negatively impact their business and/or harm our business. In addition, the loss of or a significant reduction in business with those distributors or resellers or the failure to achieve anticipated levels of sell-through with any one of our major international distributors or large resellers could harm our business. In particular, if one or more of such distributors or resellers were unable to meet their obligations with respect to our accounts receivable from them, we could be forced to write off such accounts receivables and may be required to delay the recognition of revenue on future sales to these customers.clients. These events could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.


If we are unable to develop, offer and deliver new and enhanced products and services that achieve widespread market acceptance, or if we are unable to continually improve the performance, features, and reliability of our existing products and services, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Rapid technological changes, as well as changes in customer requirements and preferences, characterize the software industry.  Just as the transition from mainframes to personal computers transformed the industry, we believe our industry will continue to transform in response to continued adoption of mobile devices and cloud-based SaaS, growth of big data, and potential emergence of capabilities resulting from disruptive innovation.  In response, we have devoted significant resources to the development of new solutions, such as our SaaS solutions. We are making such investments through our internal efforts, including further development and enhancement of our existing products, as well as through potential acquisitions of new product lines.  Innovation, new product development or acquisition, and go-to-market activities involve a significant commitment of time and resources and are subject to a number of risks and challenges including:

Developing, sustaining, and appropriately leveraging market intelligence to identify areas of market need that offer potentially high return on investment for solution development.

Managing the length of the development cycle for new products and product enhancements which may be longer than originally expected.

Adapting to emerging and evolving industry standards and to technological developments by our competitors and customers.

Addressing the evolution of operating systems and industry platforms that presently may not be served by our existing products.

Entering into new or unproven markets with which we have limited experience.

Managing new product and service strategies, including integrating our various security and file replication technologies, management solutions, customer service, and support into unified enterprise security and file replication solutions.

Incorporating acquired products and technologies acquired through mergers, acquisitions or other relationships with third-parties.

Developing or expanding efficient sales channels.

Obtaining sufficient licenses to technology and technical access from operating system software vendors on reasonable terms to enable the development and deployment of interoperable products, including source code licenses for certain products with deep technical integration into operating systems.

Changing purchasing trends such as purchasing through on-line marketplaces such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft AZURE rather than direct sales or traditional channels.

Investments in new products may not result in sufficient revenue generation to justify their costs or may cause short or long-term harm to our financial results.  For example, customer adoption of our SaaS products may not occur as rapidly as anticipated, or competitors may introduce new products and services that achieve acceptance among our current customers thereby adversely affecting our competitive position, or we may not be successful in future attempts to achieve disruptive innovation.

Our executive management team must act quickly, continuously and with vision due to the rapid speed of changing customer expectations and advancement of technology inherent in the software industry, the extensive and complex efforts required to create useful and widely accepted products, the rapid evolution of cloud computing, mobile devices, and new computing platforms, and the creation of other new technologies. Although we have adopted a strategy that we believe will fulfill these challenges, if we fail to execute properly on that strategy, adapt that strategy as market conditions evolve, or internalize and execute on that strategy, we may fail to meet our customers’ expectations, fail to compete with our competitors’ products and technology, and lose the confidence of our channel partners and employees.  Such circumstances could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Revenue from our Mail Express, Wide Area File Services, CuteFTP and TappIn product lines will likely decline in the future and become a smaller part of our total revenue.

Revenue from our products and services other than our EFT solution was $2.2 million and $3.0 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and accounted for 7% and 10% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively.  As we increase our focus and emphasis on our EFT platform products, our revenue from these products will likely continue to decline. We incur costs and expenses supporting these products for our customers who are currently using them. If revenue from these products continues to decline, we may begin to incur losses from these products. The potential for such losses may cause us to decide to sell or discontinue one or more of these product lines. If we cannot effectively reduce our costs to support these products, or if see decide to sell one or more of these product lines but cannot find a buyer for them, we may begin incurring losses on these products that could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.


We may engage third parties to develop products on our behalf. These engagements may involve reliance on resources owned and managed by those third parties over which we have no direct control.

In addition to research and development of new products by our employees, we engage third parties from time-to-time to conceive, design and develop products on our behalf.  Arrangements of this type involve high levels of risk due to inherent uncertainties about the timely delivery and ultimate viability of those products due to the reliance we must place on third parties to plan, perform and successfully complete work for us.  These are processes for which we could have notably less direct control than if we performed the work ourselves.  These arrangements involve our reliance on the ongoing financial viability of the enterprise performing the work.  This risk is challenging to manage because we do not always have clear visibility as to the overall condition of the third-party enterprise.  These risks could result in the product not being successfully completed within the expected timeframe, or at all. If actual results from these type of endeavors that we may undertake in the future differ materially from original and ongoing expectations, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.

Our ability to develop our software will be seriously impaired if we are not able to use our foreign subcontractors.

We rely on foreign subcontractors to help us develop some aspects of some of our software. If these programmers decided to stop working for us, or if we were unable to continue using them because of political or economic instability, we would have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers in a timely manner. In addition, we would likely have to pay considerably more for the same work, especially if we used U.S. personnel. If we could not replace the contract programmers, it could take us longer to develop certain products and product upgrades and at a higher cost.

Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our revenue.
We believe there could be notable seasonal factors in the future that may cause us to record higher revenue in some quarters compared with others. We believe this variability is possible largely due to our customers’ budgetary and spending patterns, as many customers spend the unused portions of their discretionary budgets prior to the end of their fiscal years. For example, we have historically recorded our highest level of revenue in our fourth quarter, which we believe corresponds to the fourth quarter of a majority of our customers. If our rate of growth slows over time, seasonal or cyclical variations in our operations may become more pronounced, and our business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected.

Reliance on delivery of our products near or at the end of each quarter could cause our revenue for the applicable period to fall below expected levels.
As a result of customer buying patterns and the efforts of our sales force and channel partners to meet or exceed their sales objectives, we have historically received a substantial portion of orders from our customers and generated a substantial portion of revenue during the last few weeks of each period. A significant interruption in our IT systems, which manage critical functions such as order processing, trade compliance reviews, delivery of our products, billings, collections, revenue recognition, and financial reporting, among others, could result in delayed order fulfillment and decreased revenue for that period. If expected revenue at the end of any period is delayed for any reason, including the failure of anticipated purchase orders to materialize, our logistics or channel partners’ inability to deliver products prior to period-end to fulfill purchase orders received near the end of the period, our inability to release new products on schedule, any failure of our systems related to order review and processing, or any delays in product delivery based on trade compliance requirements, our revenue for that period could fall below our expectations and the estimates of market analysts, if any, which could adversely impact our business and results of operations and cause a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

The transition from an on-premise to a cloud-based, SaaS subscription business model is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. 
We believe that there will be a continuing shift away from sales of on-premise software licenses to sales of subscriptions for our cloud-based, SaaS solutions, which provide our customers the right to access certain of our software in a hosted environment for a specified subscription period. This SaaS strategy may give rise to a number of risks, including the following:

·
If customers are uncomfortable with cloud-based solutions and desire only perpetual licenses, we may experience longer than anticipated sales cycles and sales of our cloud-based solutions may lag behind our expectations;
·
Our cloud-based strategy may raise concerns among our customer base, including concerns regarding changes to pricing over time, service availability, information security of a cloud-based solution and access to files while offline or once a subscription has expired;
·
We may be unsuccessful in maintaining our target pricing, adoption and projected renewal rates;
·
We may select a target price that is not optimal and could negatively affect our sales or earnings; and
· We may incur costs at a higher than forecasted rate as we expand our cloud-based solutions.
The shift of our customers’ preference to cloud-based, SaaS solutions  may also require a considerable investment of technical, financial, legal and sales resources, and a scalable organization. Market acceptance of such offerings is affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to: security, reliability, scalability, customization, performance, current license terms, customer preference, customer concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage their data, public concerns regarding privacy and the enactment of restrictive laws or regulations. Whether our business model transition will prove successful and will accomplish our business and financial objectives is subject to numerous uncertainties, including but not limited to: customer demand, renewal rates, channel acceptance, our ability to further develop and scale infrastructure, our ability to include functionality and usability in such solutions that address customer requirements, tax and accounting implications, pricing and our costs. In addition, the metrics we use to gauge the status of our business may evolve over the course of the transition as significant trends emerge.
If we are unable to successfully establish our cloud-based solutions and navigate our business model transition in light of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Our subscription services, such as our EFT Cloud Services, may impact our revenue trends as some opportunities that otherwise would have materialized as software license sales for on-premises installation at our customers’ sites could potentially shift to subscription-based sales.

In recent years, most of our revenue, and the growth of our revenue, has been attributable to perpetual license and M&S sales of our EFT solution.  Perpetual license fees for software to be installed at a customer site are typically recognized in full as revenue at the time the software is delivered to the customer. On the other hand, subscription services are recognized as revenue over time as the services are delivered (assuming collection is deemed probable), typically on a monthly basis. Any significant increase in the percentage of our business generated from such a subscription model could, as a result, delay revenue recognition and have a negative impact on our operating results.

The impact of subscription services on prior revenue growth trends depends on several key factors, including the number of customers who may shift from on-premise software licenses to subscription services, the rate at which they may do so, the subscription term and fees, and the comparative value of the opportunity had it materialized as a software license sale instead of as a subscription service.  Generally, for a fixed number of opportunities (that is, without considering the possibility that a new service offering may result in additional sales opportunities), the addition of subscription services reduces revenue growth rates for several quarters for the associated solutions until cumulative subscription revenue increases and, potentially, surpasses comparable software license revenue. The revenue impacts are particularly pronounced early in the introduction of subscription services because there has been only a short time period for accumulation of the recurring revenue stream.  As we continue to promote subscription-based services, the risk of this revenue shift will continue with revenue derived from sales of our EFT solution, the comparable on-premises MFT software in our portfolio, most subject to ongoing transitory risk from the introduction of these subscription services.

Subscription offerings create risks related to the timing of revenue recognition.

Although the subscription model is designed to increase the number of customers who purchase our products and services and create a recurring revenue stream that is more predictable, it creates certain risks related to the timing of revenue recognition and potential reductions in cash flows.

A decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any period may not be immediately reflected in our reported financial results for that period but may result in a decline in our revenue in future periods. If we were to experience significant downturns in subscription sales and renewal rates, our reported financial results might not reflect such downturns until future periods. Our subscription model could also make it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenues from subscription or SaaS-based services through additional sales in any period as revenue from new customers will be recognized over the applicable subscription term. Increases in sales under our subscription sales model could result in decreased revenues over the short term if they are offset by a decline in sales from perpetual license customers.


Our cloud and SaaS offerings bring additional business and operational risks.

We offer delivery of several of our products using a SaaS model. Our SaaS offerings provide our customers with existing and new software management through a cloud service as opposed to traditional on-premises software deployments. There can be no assurance that SaaS revenue will be significant in the future despite our levels of investment in developing this product delivery method. Margins associated with our SaaS offerings are generally lower than margins associated with our on-premises solutions.

Most of our SaaS subscription arrangements are under month-to-month agreements. Accordingly, our customers generally have no long-term obligation to us and may cancel their SaaS subscription at any time. Even if our customers are satisfied with our SaaS products and services, they may elect not to continue their SaaS subscription, and in fact, some customers elect not to do so. Renewal rates in the future may differ from historical trends such that we may not be able to accurately predict customer renewal rates. Our customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including their level of satisfaction with our services and their ability to continue their operations and spending levels. If we experience a decline in the renewal rates for our customers or they opt for lower-priced editions of our offerings or fewer subscriptions, our operating results may be adversely impacted.

There is a risk that we could find it difficult or costly to support both traditional software installed by customers and software delivered as a service. To the extent that our SaaS offerings are defective or there are disruptions to our services, demand for our SaaS offerings could diminish, and we could be subject to substantial liability.

Interruptions or delays in service from our third party service delivery hosts could impair the delivery of our services and harm our business. If we or our third party service delivery hosts experience security breaches and unauthorized access is obtained to a customer’s data or our data, our services may be perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or stop using our services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure and liabilities.

Our success with our SaaS solutions depends on organizations and customers perceiving technological and operational benefits and cost savings associated with the increasing adoption of virtual infrastructure solutions in lieu of on-premises data centers. Concerns about security, privacy, availability, data integrity, retention and ownership may negatively impact the rate of adoption of these solutions. SaaS software solutions can be complex, and the deployment of our secure file transfer solutions in the desired manner may require additional professional services and implementation services for which we may not have the ability to provide at an appropriate margin. Our SaaS products are dependent upon third party hardware, software and hosting vendors, all of which must interoperate for end users to achieve their computing goals. We expect other companies to enter this market and to introduce their own initiatives that may compete with, or not be compatible with, our cloud solutions.

If any of these events were to occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We rely on third parties to provide us with a number of operational services, including hosting and delivery of our SaaS products, certain of our customer support services, and other operations.  Any interruption or delay in service from these third parties, breaches of security or privacy, or failures in data collection could expose us to liability, harm our reputation and adversely impact our financial performance.

We rely on hosted computer services from third parties for certain services that we provide our customers.  As we gather customer data and host certain customer data in third-party facilities, a security breach could compromise the integrity or availability or result in the theft of customer data.  In addition, our operations could be negatively affected in the event of a security breach, and we could be subject to the loss or theft of confidential or proprietary information.

Unauthorized access to this data may be obtained through break-ins, breach of our secure network by an unauthorized party, employee theft or misuse, or other misconduct.  We rely on a number of third party suppliers in the operation of our business for the provisioning of various services and materials that we use in the production of our products.  Although we seek to diversify our third party suppliers, we may from time to time rely on a single or limited number of suppliers, or upon suppliers in a single country, for these services or materials.  The inability of such third parties to satisfy our requirements could disrupt our business operations or make it more difficult for us to implement our business strategy.  If any of these situations were to occur, our reputation could be harmed, we could be subject to third party liability, including under data protection and privacy laws in certain jurisdictions, and our financial performance could be negatively impacted.

Fluctuations in professional services revenue may be greater than experienced in previous reporting periods and have a disproportionate impact on our financial results.  For example, increased professional services sales, especially to the government, may result in lower earnings as a percentage of revenue.

Our solution portfolio includes software licenses, subscription services, M&S, and professional services.  Because they are relatively labor intensive, professional services typically have substantially lower margins than software license sales, M&S and subscription services. Professional services were 8% and 7% of our total revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively.  However, this percentage can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on the needs of our customers.

Depending on our mix of software licenses, subscription, M&S, and professional services revenue in a given reporting period, our earnings as a percentage of revenue may fluctuate from historical norms. For example, if we were to derive a relatively large (compared to historical norms) component of our revenue from professional services in a reporting period, earnings as a percentage of revenue may decline in that period due to lower margin contribution from those labor-intensive services as compared to software license, subscription, and M&S revenue.

An inability to establish vendor specific objective evidence of the selling price of one or more components of a software sale with multiple components could result in our having to change from recognizing software license revenue in full at the time the software is delivered to recognizing that same software license revenue ratably in the future over an extended number of accounting periods.

For software sales with multiple components (typically a sale involving both a license to software that will be delivered immediately and M&S or professional services that will be delivered over an extended period of time), generally accepted accounting principles require that vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value be established for at least all but one of the components of that sale before the software license revenue can be recognized in full at the time of delivery to the customer. If VSOE of fair value cannot be established, recognition of the software license revenue must be deferred and recognized ratably in the future over an extended number of accounting periods, the length of which would typically be the time period covered by the related M&S or professional services contract. We currently have established VSOE of selling price in a manner that supports our recognizing software license revenue in full at the time we deliver the software to our customers for substantially all of our products.

Situations can arise where a change in product pricing that improves our cash flow and financial position has an unintended consequence of our not being able to establish VSOE of fair value where it existed before.  If that set of circumstances were to occur, we could be required by generally accepted accounting principles to defer recognition of software license revenue to future periods. That requirement could cause us to experience an immediate decline in software license revenue recognized in our financial statements in the period in which the licensed software was delivered to our customer even though the timing and amount of cash flow from the transaction would be the same as if we had established VSOE of fair value.  If this collection of events were to occur, it could have a material, adverse effect on our revenue, results of operations and financial condition we present in our financial statements.

We may not be able to compete effectively with larger, better-positioned companies, resulting in lower margins and loss of market share.

We operate in intensely competitive markets that experience rapid technological developments, market consolidation, changes in industry standards, changes in customer requirements, and frequent new product introductions and product improvements by existing and new competitors.  If we are unable to anticipate or react to these competitive challenges or if existing or new competitors take or gain additional market share in any of our markets, our competitive position could weaken, and we could experience a decrease in revenues that could adversely affect our business and operating results.  To compete successfully, we must maintain a successful research and development effort to create new products and services and enhance existing products and services, effectively adapt to changes in the technology or product rights held by our competitors, appropriately respond to competitor strategies as such strategies become apparent, and effectively adapt to technological changes and changes in the ways that our information is accessed, used, and stored within our enterprise and consumer markets.  If we are unsuccessful in responding to our competitors or to changing technological and customer demands, we could experience a negative effect on our competitive position and our financial results.


We compete with a variety of companies that have significantly greater revenues and financial resources, more partners, resellers and distribution channels than we have, and greater quantities of personnel and technical resources. For example, our EFT solution suite competes with products from IBM Sterling, Ipswitch, Axway and several other vendors. Our WAFS product competes with Riverbed Technology, Panzura, and Peer Sync.  Large companies may be able to develop new technologies, across multiple solution spaces, and on more operating systems, more quickly than we can, to offer a broader array of products, and to respond more quickly to new opportunities, industry standards or customer requirements.

Additional competitors may enter the market and also may have significantly greater capabilities and resources than we do. Some existing competitors also may be able to adopt more aggressive pricing strategies. For example, Ipswitch provides an older version of its consumer file transfer protocol program for free for non-commercial use, and Microsoft includes file transfer protocol functionality in its Internet browser, which it also distributes for free. Increased competition may result in lower operating margins and loss of market share.

As we attempt to expand our business, our operating expenses may increase, and we may incur losses.

We intend to expand our business, specifically with regard to new on-premise license sales and SaaS delivery of our products. To do so, we plan to increase our research and development expenditures to accelerate our introduction of new features, functions and capabilities for our products to the marketplace. We intend to enhance the presence and visibility of those products by increasing our sales and marketing expenditures to expand our sales force, particularly through a broader reseller program involving more third-parties, and by implementing new sales lead generation and marketing initiatives.

These expanded research and development and sales and marketing activities may result in an increase in our operating expenses. If we do not successfully develop new features, functions and capabilities for our products in a manner that increases license sales of our products, and if our enhanced sales and marketing activities, including expansion of our third-party reseller programs, are not successful, our revenue may not increase. In that event, our net income could decline or we may incur losses.

As we develop new products or new features, functions and capabilities for existing products, we capitalize certain of our costs related to those activities and defer the expense arising from those activities to future periods.

In accordance with GAAP, we capitalize certain of our costs related to the development of new products or new features, functions and capabilities for existing products. We present these capitalized costs as an asset on our balance sheet. We amortize these costs to expense in future periods after these work products are completed and released for sale so as to match these expenses the associated revenue we earn in the future. If we were to deem these capitalized costs not to be realizable through future revenue and accordingly had to reduce the carrying value of these assets, possibly to zero, we could incur significant expenses earlier than anticipated.

Our products are complex and operate in a wide variety of computer configurations, which could result in errors or product failures.

Addressing MFT, hosted services and secure content mobility typically requires very complex products.  Undetected errors, failures, or bugs may occur, especially when products are first introduced or when new versions are released.  Our products are often installed and used in large-scale computing environments with different operating systems, system management software, and equipment and networking configurations, which may cause errors or failures in our products or may expose undetected errors, failures, or bugs in our products.  Our customers’ computing environments also are often characterized by a wide variety of standard and non-standard configurations that make pre-release testing for programming or compatibility errors very difficult and time-consuming.  In addition, despite testing by us and others, errors, failures, or bugs may not be found in new products or releases until after commencement of commercial shipments.  In the past, we have discovered software errors, failures, and bugs in certain of our product offerings after their introduction and have experienced delayed or lost revenues during the time required to correct these errors.


Errors, failures, or bugs in products released by us could result in negative publicity, product returns, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products, loss of competitive position, or claims by customers or others.  Many of our end-user customers use our products in applications that are critical to their businesses and may have a greater sensitivity to defects in our products than to defects in other, less critical, software products.  In addition, if an actual or perceived breach of information integrity or availability occurs in one of our end-user customer’s systems, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed.  Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions, delays, or cessation of our product licensing, which could cause us to lose existing or potential customers and could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business is subject to the risks of warranty claims, product returns, product liability and product defects.

Real or perceived errors, failures or defects in our products could result in claims by customers for losses that they sustain.  If customers make these types of claims, we may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem. Liability provisions in our standard terms and conditions of sale, and those of our resellers and distributors, may not be enforceable under some circumstances or may not fully or effectively protect us from customer claims and related liabilities and costs, including indemnification obligations under our agreements with resellers and distributors. The sale and support of our products also entail the risk of product liability claims.  We maintain insurance to protect against certain types of claims associated with the use of our products, but our insurance coverage may not adequately cover any such claims. Even claims that ultimately are unsuccessful could result in expenditures of funds in connection with litigation and divert management’s time and other resources.

Turmoil and uncertainty in U.S. and international economic markets could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Demand for our products depends in large part upon the level of capital and maintenance expenditures by many of our customers.  Economic downturns could have an adverse effect on spending on information technology projects since in such environments, prospects and customers may reduce, sometimes greatly, their discretionary spending to focus on preserving mandatory spending budgets.

These adverse impacts to customer spending may be directly, and adversely, reflected in our future business and operating results because we believe a substantial part of their MFT spending budget is considered discretionary by our prospects and customers. The perception of MFT solutions spending as discretionary is further reinforced by the existence of low cost, or even free, products that deliver some subset of the capabilities found in our solutions.  In the event of an economic downturn, some customers may decide to defer spending for our solutions or may elect to obtain low cost or free “good enough” products as an interim measure.  The potential adverse impacts of such decisions may persist for an extended period of time, even well into a period of economic recovery, given that many prospects will not change their IT infrastructure for a considerable period of time after that infrastructure has been installed and is operating adequately.

Adverse financial results from another economic downturn and uncertainty could include flat, or even decreasing, sales, lower gross and net margins, and impairment of current or future goodwill and long-lived assets.  In addition, some of our customers could delay paying their obligations to us.  Potentially reduced sales and margins and customer payment problems could limit our ability to fund research and development, marketing, sales, and other activities necessary to sustain and expand our market position.

In past economic downturns, we have sometimes experienced a decrease in our stock price. If investors have concerns that our business, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively impacted by another economic downturn, our stock price could decrease again.

Regardless of economic conditions, fluctuations in demand for our products and services are driven by many factors and a decrease in demand for our products could adversely affect our financial results.

We are subject to fluctuations in demand for our products and services due to a variety of factors, including competition, product obsolescence, technological change, budget constraints of our actual and potential customers, awareness of security threats to IT systems, and other factors.  While such factors may, in some periods, increase product sales, fluctuations in demand can also negatively impact our product sales.  If demand for our products declines, our revenues, as well as our gross and net margins, could be adversely affected.


Sales to the U.S. Government make up a portion of our business, and changes in government defense spending could have consequences on our financial position, results of operations and business.

Our revenues from the U.S. Government largely result from contracts awarded to us under various U.S. Government programs, primarily defense-related programs with the Department of Defense (“DoD”). The funding of our programs is subject to the overall U.S. Government foreign policy, budget and appropriation decisions, and processes which are driven by numerous factors, including geo-political events and macroeconomic conditions, and are beyond our control. Projected defense spending budgets are uncertain and difficult to predict.

Significant changes in defense spending could have long-term consequences for our size and structure. Changes in government priorities and requirements could impact the funding, or the timing of funding, of our programs which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.  Government contracts typically have long sales cycles such that closure of such contracts is difficult to predict.

U.S. Government contracts generally also permit the government to terminate the contract, in whole or in part, without prior notice, at the government’s convenience or for default based on performance. A termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability and have a negative impact on our ability to obtain future contracts and orders. Furthermore, on contracts for which we are a subcontractor and not the prime contractor, the U.S. Government could terminate the prime contract for convenience or otherwise, irrespective of our performance as a subcontractor.

Because we are a DoD contractor, certain of our items and/or transactions may be subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) if our software or services are specifically designed or modified for defense purposes.  Companies engaged in manufacturing or exporting ITAR-controlled goods and services (even if these companies do not export such items) are required to register with the U.S. State Department.  Failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines and sanctions which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

If we lose key personnel we may not be able to execute our business plan.

Our future success depends on the continued services of our employees. If employees leave, it can be difficult to replace them because of the intense competition in the marketplace for people with the skillsets we need to operate our business. New employees may not be productive for weeks or months as they learn about our solutions, our personnel and the administrative practices within our company.

It may be difficult for us to recruit and retain software developers and other technical and management personnel because we are a relatively small company.


We compete intensely with other software development and distribution companies domestically and internationally as well as information technology departments supporting larger businesses all of whom strive to recruit and hire employees from a limited pool of qualified personnel. Some qualified candidates prefer to work for larger, better known companies or in another geographic area. In order to attract and retain personnel in a competitive marketplace, we believe that we must provide a competitive compensation package, including cash, equity-based compensation, and other employee benefits including medical insurance and healthcare plans. The volatility in our stock price may from time to time adversely affect our ability to recruit or retain employees. In addition, we may be unable to obtain required stockholder approvals of future increases in the number of shares available for issuance under our equity compensation plans. Also, accounting rules require us to treat the issuance of employee stock options and other forms of equity-based compensation as compensation expense. As a result, we may decide to issue fewer equity-based incentives and may be impaired in our efforts to attract and retain necessary personnel. If we are unable to hire and retain qualified employees, or conversely, if we fail to manage employee performance or reduce staffing levels when required by market conditions, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

19

Key personnel have left our company in the past. There likely will be additional departures of key personnel from time to time in the future. The loss of any key employee could result in significant disruptions to our operations, including adversely affecting the timeliness of product releases, the successful implementation and completion of company initiatives, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting, and the results of our operations. Hiring, training, and successfully integrating replacement sales, engineering, and other personnel could be time consuming, may cause additional disruptions to our operations, and may be unsuccessful, which could negatively impact future revenues.


We may engage third parties to develop products on our behalf. These engagements may involve reliance on resources owned and managed by those third parties over which we have no direct control.

In addition to research and development of new products by our employees, we engage third parties from time-to-time to conceive, design and develop products on our behalf. Arrangements of this type involve high levels of risk as a result of inherent uncertainties about the timely delivery and ultimate viability of those products due to the reliance we must place on third parties to plan, perform and successfully complete work for us. These are processes for which we could have notably less direct control than if we performed the work ourselves. These arrangements involve our reliance on the ongoing financial viability of the enterprise performing the work. This risk is challenging to manage because we do not always have clear visibility as to the overall condition of the third-party enterprise. These risks could result in the product not being successfully completed within the expected timeframe, or at all. If actual results from these types of endeavors that we may undertake in the future differ materially from original and ongoing expectations, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.

Our ability to develop our software will be seriously impaired if we are not able to use our foreign subcontractors.

We rely on foreign subcontractors to help us develop some aspects of some of our software. If these programmers decided to stop working for us, or if we were unable to continue using them because of political or economic instability, we would have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers in a timely manner. In addition, we would likely have to pay considerably more for the same work, especially if we used U.S. personnel. If we could not replace the contract programmers, it could take us longer to develop certain products and product upgrades and at a higher cost.

Reliance on delivery of our products near or at the end of each quarter could cause our revenue for the applicable period to fall below expected levels.

As a result of client buying patterns and the efforts of our sales force and channel partners to meet or exceed their sales objectives, we have historically received a substantial portion of orders from our clients and generated a substantial portion of revenue during the last few weeks of each period. A significant interruption in our IT systems, which manage critical functions such as order processing, trade compliance reviews, delivery of our products, billings, collections, revenue recognition, and financial reporting, among others, could result in delayed order fulfillment and decreased revenue for that period. If expected revenue at the end of any period is delayed for any reason, including the failure of anticipated purchase orders to materialize, our logistics or channel partners’ inability to deliver products prior to period-end to fulfill purchase orders received near the end of the period, our inability to release new products on schedule, any failure of our systems related to order review and processing, or any delays in product delivery based on trade compliance requirements, our revenue for that period could fall below our expectations and the estimates of market analysts, if any, which could adversely impact our business and results of operations and cause a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

Fluctuations in professional services revenue may be greater than experienced in previous reporting periods and have a disproportionate impact on our financial results. For example, increased professional services sales, especially to the government, may result in lower earnings as a percentage of revenue.

Our solution portfolio includes software licenses, subscription services, M&S, and professional services. Because they are relatively labor intensive, professional services typically have substantially lower margins than software license sales, M&S and subscription services. Professional services were 7% of our total revenue in 2019 and 2018. However, this percentage can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on the needs of our clients.

Depending on our mix of software licenses, subscription, M&S, and professional services revenue in a given reporting period, our earnings as a percentage of revenue may fluctuate from historical norms. For example, if we were to derive a relatively large (compared to historical norms) component of our revenue from professional services in a reporting period, earnings as a percentage of revenue may decline in that period due to lower margin contribution from those labor-intensive services as compared to software license, subscription, and M&S revenue.

We may not be able to compete effectively with larger, better-positioned companies, resulting in lower margins and loss of market share.

We operate in competitive markets that experience rapid technological developments, market consolidation, changes in industry standards, changes in client requirements, and frequent new product introductions and product improvements by existing and new competitors. If we are unable to anticipate or react to these competitive challenges or if existing or new competitors take or gain additional market share in any of our markets, our competitive position could weaken, and we could experience a decrease in revenues that could adversely affect our business and operating results. To compete successfully, we must maintain a successful research and development effort to create new products and services and enhance existing products and services, effectively adapt to changes in the technology or product rights held by our competitors, appropriately respond to competitor strategies as such strategies become apparent, and effectively adapt to technological changes and changes in the ways that our information is accessed, used, and stored within our enterprise and consumer markets. If we are unsuccessful in responding to our competitors or to changing technological and client demands, we could experience a negative effect on our competitive position and our financial results.

We compete with a variety of companies that have significantly greater revenues and financial resources, more partners, resellers and distribution channels than we have, and greater quantities of personnel and technical resources. For example, our EFT solution suite competes with products from IBM Sterling, Ipswitch, Axway and several other vendors. Large companies may be able to develop new technologies, across multiple solution spaces, and on more operating systems, more quickly than we can, to offer a broader array of products, and to respond more quickly to new opportunities, industry standards or client requirements.

Additional competitors may enter the market and also may have significantly greater financial capabilities and resources than we do. Some existing competitors also may be able to sustain and adopt more aggressive pricing strategies.

As we develop new products or new features, functions and capabilities for existing products, we capitalize certain of our costs related to those activities and defer the expense arising from those activities to future periods.

In accordance with GAAP, we capitalize certain of our costs related to the development of new products or new features, functions and capabilities for existing products. We present these capitalized costs as an asset on our balance sheet. We amortize these costs to expense in future periods after these work products are completed and released for sale so as to match these expenses with the associated revenue we earn in the future. If we were to deem these capitalized costs not to be realizable through future revenue, and accordingly had to reduce the carrying value of these assets, possibly to zero, we could incur significant expenses earlier than anticipated.

Our products are complex and operate in a wide variety of computer configurations, which could result in errors or product failures.

Addressing MFT both on-premise licenses and SaaS models typically requires complex products. Undetected errors, failures, or bugs may occur, especially when products are first introduced or when new versions are released. Our products are often installed and used in large-scale computing environments with different operating systems, system management software, and equipment and networking configurations, which may cause errors or failures in our products or may expose undetected errors, failures, or bugs in our products. Our clients’ computing environments also are often characterized by a wide variety of standard and non-standard configurations that make pre-release testing for programming or compatibility errors difficult and time-consuming. In addition, despite testing by us and others, errors, failures, or bugs may not be found in new products or releases until after commencement of commercial shipments. In the past, we have discovered software errors, failures, and bugs in certain of our product offerings after their introduction and have experienced delayed or lost revenues during the time required to correct these errors.

Errors, failures, or bugs in products released by us could result in negative publicity, product returns, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products, loss of competitive position, or claims by clients or others. Many of our end-user clients use our products in applications that are critical to their businesses and may have a greater sensitivity to defects in our products than to defects in other, less critical, software products. In addition, if an actual or perceived breach of information integrity or availability occurs in one of our end-user client’s systems, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions, delays, or cessation of our product licensing, which could cause us to lose existing or potential clients and could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business is subject to the risks of warranty claims, product returns, product liability and product defects.

Real or perceived errors, failures or defects in our products could result in claims by clients for losses that they sustain. If clients make these types of claims, we may be required, or may choose, for client relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem. Liability provisions in our standard terms and conditions of sale, and those of our resellers and distributors, may not be enforceable under some circumstances or may not fully or effectively protect us from client claims and related liabilities and costs, including indemnification obligations under our agreements with resellers and distributors. The sale and support of our products also entail the risk of product liability claims. We maintain insurance to protect against certain types of claims associated with the use of our products, but our insurance coverage may not adequately cover any such claims. Even claims that ultimately are unsuccessful could result in expenditures of funds in connection with litigation and divert management’s time and other resources.

Turmoil and uncertainty in U.S. and international economic markets could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Demand for our products depends in large part upon the level of capital and maintenance expenditures by many of our clients. Economic downturns or other adverse economic conditions, including but not limited to, public health crises that reduce economic activity (including the recent coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak) could have an adverse effect on spending on information technology projects since in such environments, prospects and clients may reduce, sometimes greatly, their discretionary spending to focus on preserving mandatory spending budgets.

These adverse impacts to client spending may be directly, and adversely, reflected in our future business and operating results because we believe a substantial part of their MFT spending budget is considered discretionary by our prospects and clients. The perception of MFT solutions spending as discretionary is further reinforced by the existence of low cost, or even free, products that deliver some subset of the capabilities found in our solutions. In the event of an economic downturn, some clients may decide to defer spending for our solutions or may elect to obtain low cost or free “good enough” products as an interim measure. The potential adverse impacts of such decisions may persist for an extended period of time, even well into a period of economic recovery, given that many prospects will not change their IT infrastructure for a considerable period of time after that infrastructure has been installed and is operating adequately.

Adverse financial results from another economic downturn or other adverse economic conditions and uncertainty could include flat, or even decreasing, sales, lower gross and net margins, and impairment of current or future goodwill and long-lived assets. In addition, some of our clients could delay paying their obligations to us. Potentially reduced sales and margins and client payment problems could limit our ability to fund research and development, marketing, sales, and other activities necessary to sustain and expand our market position.

In past economic downturns, we have sometimes experienced a decrease in our stock price. If investors have concerns that our business, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively impacted by another economic downturn, our stock price could decrease again.

Regardless of economic conditions, fluctuations in demand for our products and services are driven by many factors and a decrease in demand for our products could adversely affect our financial results.

We are subject to fluctuations in demand for our products and services due to a variety of factors, including competition, product obsolescence, technological change, budget constraints of our actual and potential clients awareness of security threats to IT systems, and other factors. While such factors may, in some periods, increase product sales, fluctuations in demand can also negatively impact our product sales. If demand for our products declines, our revenues, as well as our gross and net margins, could be adversely affected.

Sales to the U.S. Government make up a portion of our business, and changes in government defense spending could have consequences on our financial position, results of operations and business.

Our revenues from the U.S. Government largely result from contracts awarded to us under various U.S. Government programs, primarily defense-related programs with the Department of Defense (“DoD”). The funding of our programs is subject to the overall U.S. Government foreign policy, budget and appropriation decisions, and processes which are driven by numerous factors, including geo-political events and macroeconomic conditions, and are beyond our control. Projected defense spending budgets are uncertain and difficult to predict.

Significant changes in defense spending could have long-term consequences for our size and structure. Changes in government priorities and requirements could impact the funding, or the timing of funding, of our programs which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. Government contracts typically have long sales cycles such that closure of such contracts is difficult to predict.

U.S. Government contracts generally also permit the government to terminate the contract, in whole or in part, without prior notice, at the government’s convenience or for default based on performance. A termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability and have a negative impact on our ability to obtain future contracts and orders. Furthermore, on contracts for which we are a subcontractor and not the prime contractor, the U.S. Government could terminate the prime contract for convenience or otherwise, irrespective of our performance as a subcontractor.

Because we are a DoD contractor, certain of our items and/or transactions may be subject to the ITAR if our software or services are specifically designed or modified for defense purposes. Companies engaged in manufacturing or exporting ITAR-controlled goods and services (even if these companies do not export such items) are required to register with the U.S. State Department. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines and sanctions which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

If we lose key personnel, we may not be able to execute our business plan.

Our future success depends on the continued services of our employees. If employees leave, it can be difficult to replace them because of the intense competition in the marketplace for people with the skillsets we need to operate our business. New employees may not be productive for weeks or months as they learn about our solutions, our personnel and the administrative practices within our company.

Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our revenue.

We believe there could be notable seasonal factors in the future that may cause us to record higher revenue in some quarters compared with others. We believe this variability is possible largely due to our clients’ budgetary and spending patterns, as many clients spend the unused portions of their discretionary budgets prior to the end of their fiscal years. For example, we have historically recorded our highest level of revenue in our fourth quarter, which we believe corresponds to the fourth quarter of a majority of our clients. If our rate of growth slows over time, seasonal or cyclical variations in our operations may become more pronounced, and our business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected.

Our current indebtedness requires us to comply with certain restrictive loan covenants which may limit our ability to operate our business.

Under the terms of our Credit Agreement, dated November 18, 2019 by and among us, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other parties thereto (the “Credit Agreement”), we have made certain customary representations and we are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants, including restrictions on our ability to incur additional debt that is not subordinated, create additional liens, transfer or dispose of assets, make distributions, consolidate, dissolve or merge, and customary events of default (including payment defaults, covenant defaults, cross defaults and bankruptcy defaults).  The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants including a minimum leverage ratio. We can provide no assurance that, if we are unable to comply with these covenants in the future, we will be able to obtain the necessary waivers or amend our Credit Agreement to prevent a default.

A breach of any of these covenants or requirements could result in a default under our Credit Agreement. If we default under our Credit Agreement and we are unable to cure the default or obtain a waiver, we will not be able to access the credit available under our Credit Agreement and there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain alternative financing. Our Credit Agreement also includes customary default provisions that entitle our lenders to take various actions in the event of a default, including, but not limited to, demanding payment for all amounts outstanding. If this occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness or borrow sufficient funds to refinance. Even if new financing is available, it may not be on terms that are acceptable to us. No assurance can be given that our future operating results will be sufficient to achieve compliance with the covenants and requirements of our Credit Agreement.

To the extent that certain borrowings under our Credit Agreement extend beyond 2021, the interest rates for these obligations might be subject to change based on recent regulatory changes.

The interest rate on Eurodollar loans under our Credit Agreement is determined by reference to the LIBO rate, which is derived from the London interbank offered rate. In July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that, after the end of 2021, it would no longer persuade or compel contributing banks to make rate submissions to the ICE Benchmark Administration (together with any successor to the ICE Benchmark Administrator, the “IBA”) for purposes of the IBA setting the London interbank offered rate. As a result, it is possible that commencing in 2022, the London interbank offered rate may no longer be available or may no longer be deemed an appropriate reference rate upon which to determine the interest rate on Eurodollar loans, and it is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established. If LIBOR ceases to exist after 2021, a comparable or successor reference rate as approved by the Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement will take effect. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with a newly created index, calculated based on repurchase agreements backed by treasury securities. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United Kingdom, the United States or elsewhere. To the extent these interest rates increase, our interest expense will increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Our operations potentially are vulnerable to security breaches that could harm the quality of our products and services or disrupt our ability to deliver our products and services.


Information security is a dynamic discipline that historically has faced threats that develop and emerge in ways that are sometimes unpredictable. Third parties may breach our systems and information security and damage our products and services or misappropriate confidential customerclient information. This might cause us to lose customers,clients, or even cause customersclients to make claims against us for damages. We may be required to expend significant resources to protect against potential or actual security breaches and/or to address problems caused by such breaches.


Improper disclosure of personal data could result in liability and harm our reputation.


While we have derived the majority of our historical revenues from on-premises delivery of our products, we now also offer our products on third-party, hosted platforms. As we continue to execute our strategy of increasing the number and scale of our cloud-based offerings, we may store and process increasingly large amounts of personally identifiable information of our customers.clients. At the same time, the continued occurrence of high-profile data breaches provides evidence of an external environment increasingly hostile to information security. This environment demands that we continuously improve our design and coordination of security controls. It is possible our security controls over personal data, our training of employees and vendors on data security, and other practices we follow may not prevent the improper disclosure of personally identifiable information. Improper disclosure of this information could harm our reputation, lead to legal exposure to customers,clients, or subject us to liability under laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. We believe consumers using our subscription services increasingly will want efficient, centralized methods of choosing their privacy preferences and controlling their data. Perceptions that our products or services do not adequately protect the privacy of personal information could inhibit sales of our products or services and could constrain consumer and business adoption of cloud-basedour solutions.


Breaches of our cybersecurity systems could degrade our ability to conduct our business operations and deliver products and services to our customers,clients, delay our ability to recognize revenue, compromise the integrity of our software products, result in significant data losses and the theft of our intellectual property, damage our reputation, expose us to liability to third parties and require us to incur significant additional costs to maintain the security of our networks and data.


We increasingly depend upon our IT systems to conduct virtually all of our business operations, ranging from our internal operations and product development activities to our marketing and sales efforts and communications with our customersclients and business partners. Cyber threats may attempt to penetrate our network security, or that of our website, and misappropriate our proprietary information or cause interruptions of our service. Because the techniques used by such attackers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system. We have also outsourced a number of our business functions to third partythird-party contractors. Therefore, our business operations also depend, in part, on the success of our contractors' own cybersecurity measures. Similarly, we rely upon distributors, resellers, system vendors and systems integrators to sell our products and our sales operations depend, in part, on the reliability of their cybersecurity measures.

Additionally, we depend upon our employees to appropriately handle confidential data and deploy our IT resources in a safe and secure fashion that does not expose our network systems to security breaches and the loss of data. Accordingly, if our cybersecurity systems and those of our contractors fail to protect against unauthorized access, sophisticated cyber-attacks and the mishandling of data by our employees and contractors, our ability to conduct our business effectively could be damaged in a number of ways, including:


·

Sensitive data regarding our business, including intellectual property and other proprietary data, could be stolen.


·

Our electronic communications systems, including email and other methods, could be disrupted, and our ability to conduct our business operations could be seriously damaged until such systems can be restored.


·

Our ability to process customerclient orders and electronically deliver products and services could be degraded, and our distribution channels could be disrupted, resulting in delays in revenue recognition.


·

Defects and security vulnerabilities could be introduced into our software products, thereby damaging the reputation and perceived reliability and security of our products and potentially making the data systems of our customersclients vulnerable to further data loss and cyber incidents.



·

Personally identifiable data of our customers,clients, employees and business partners could be lost.


Should any of the above events occur, we could be subject to significant claims for liability from our customersclients or from regulatory actions of governmental agencies, our ability to protect our intellectual property rights could be compromised and our reputation and competitive position could be significantly harmed. Also, the regulatory and contractual actions, litigations, investigations, fines, penalties and liabilities relating to data breaches that result in losses of personally identifiable or credit card information of users of our services could be significant in terms of fines and reputational impact and necessitate changes to our business operations that may be disruptive to us. Additionally, we could incur significant costs in order to upgrade our cybersecurity systems and remediate damages. Consequently, our financial performance and results of operations could be adversely affected.


Certain components of the software code comprising some of our products are licensed from third parties making us dependent upon those licenses remaining in place for those products to operate in their current form.


Certain key components of the software code comprising certain of our products are licensed from unrelated, third parties. These licenses are not perpetual and, as such, with advance notice as provided in the license agreements, these third parties could terminate these licenses. Even with advance notice, termination of these licenses could create a severe hardship for us due to the need to locate substitute software code from other third parties or create alternative software code ourselves in order for our products to continue to operate in the manner designed or for us to keep pace with customerclient requirements, including our obligations under maintenance and support agreements. There is no assurance we could achieve either of those alternative solutions in a timely and effective manner that would not disrupt our ability to continue selling and supporting those products, or without the consumption of significant company resources in the form of time spent by our personnel creating alternative solutions or cash paid to third parties to assist us. Such a situation could delay the completion and introduction to the marketplace of other products we are developing to remain competitive due to the diversion of the attention of certain of our key personnel away from that work. If any of these events occur, our future business and financial results could be adversely affected.


We utilize “open source” software in some of our products.


The open source software community develops software technology for free use by anyone. We incorporate a limited amount of open source code software into our products. We may use more open source code software in the future.


Our use, in some instances, of open source code software may impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our solutions and may subject us to possible intellectual property litigation. Open source code may impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our products because, among other reasons, open source license terms may be ambiguous and may result in unanticipated obligations regarding our solution, and open source software cannot be protected under trade secret law. In addition, it may be difficult for us to accurately determine the identities of the developers of the open source code and whether the acquired software infringes third-party intellectual property rights. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products have been subject to such claims.

25

Claims of infringement or misappropriation against us could be costly for us to defend and could require us to re-engineer our solution or to seek to obtain licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our solution. We also might need to discontinue the sale of our solution in the event re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely or cost-effective basis. If any such claim, attempted remediation, or solution discontinuance occur, our business and operating results could be harmed.


Our products may expose customers clients to invasion of privacy, causing customer client dissatisfaction or possible claims against us for damages.


Our products and solutions are intended to facilitate data and information transfer and sharing, sometimes by providing outsiders access to a customer’sclient’s computer. Such access potentially may make the customerclient vulnerable to security breaches, which could result in the loss of the customer’sclient’s privacy or property. Invasions of privacy or other customerclient harm occurring in an environment where our solutions are operating could result in customerclient dissatisfaction and possible claims against us for any resulting damages.



We are subject to governmental export and import controls and sanctions laws that could subject us to liability or impair our ability to compete in international markets.


All products that are exported, re-exported or that are worked on by foreign nationals are subject to export controls.  Such controls include prohibitions on end uses, end users and exports to certain sanctioned countries.  In addition, incorporation of encryption technology into our products increases the level of U.S. export controls.  We are subject to these requirements as certain of our products include the ability for the end user to encrypt data.  Therefore, our products may be exported outside the United States or revealed to foreign nationals only by complying with the required level of export controls/restrictions. Restrictions applicable to our products may include a requirement to have a license to export the technology, a requirement to have software licenses approved before export is allowed, and outright bans on the licensing of certain encryption technology to particular end users or to all end users in a particular country.  In addition, various countries regulate the import and re-export of certain technology and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our products or could limit our customers’clients’ ability to implement our products in those countries.

countries or that make it a violation for us to comply with U.S. sanctions requirements.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining or maintaining the licenses and other authorizations required to export our products from applicable government authorities. Any change in export or import regulations or related legislation, shift in approach to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, changes in the list of countries to which we cannot export, or changes in persons or technologies targeted by such regulations could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential customersclients with international operations.  Changes in our products or changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction of our products in international markets, prevent our customersclients with international operations from deploying our products throughout their global systems or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries, companies or individuals altogether. Any change in export, import or importsanctions regulations or related legislation, a shift in approach to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential customersclients with international operations.

Export and sanctions laws and regulations can be extremely complex in their application.  If we are found not to have complied with applicable export control or sanctions laws, we may be sanctioned, fined or penalized by, among other things, having our ability to obtain export licenses curtailed or eliminated, possibly for an extended period of time. Our failure to receive or maintain any required export licenses or authorizations or our being penalized for failure to comply with applicable export control or sanctions laws would hinder our ability to sell our products, could result in financial penalties, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.  Any failure on our part or the part of our distributors to comply with encryption or other applicable export control or sanctions requirements could harm our business and operating results.

Import and export regulations of encryption/decryption technology vary from country to country. We may be subject to different statutory or regulatory controls, including licensing requirements, in different foreign jurisdictions, and as such, importation or re-exportation of our technology may not be permitted in these foreign jurisdictions. Violations of foreign regulations or regulation of international transactions could prevent us from being able to sell our products in international markets. Our success depends in large part on our having access to international markets. A violation of foreign regulations could limit our access to such markets and have a negative effect on our results of operations.

26

As our international sales grow, we could become increasingly subject to additional risks that could harm our business.


We conduct significant sales and customerclient support in countries outside of the United States. Approximately 23%24% and 24%26% of our sales were to purchasers outside the United States in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. If our sales outside the United States increase, we may be required to further expand our international operations. To successfully expand international sales, we must establish additional foreign operations, hire additional personnel, including regulatory compliance professionals, and recruit additional international resellers. We may also incur additional expense translating our applications into additional languages. In addition, there is significant competition for entry into high growth markets. Our international operations are subject to a variety of risks, which could cause fluctuations in the results of our international operations. These risks include:


·

Compliance with foreign regulatory and market requirements.


·

Variability of foreign economic, political and labor conditions.


·

Changing restrictions imposed by regulatory requirements, tariffs or other trade barriers or by U.S. export laws.


·

Potential increase in expenses to comply with international data protection laws.

The imposition by the United States government of sanctions on countries, individuals or business entities.

Longer accounts receivable payment cycles.


·

Potentially adverse tax consequences.


·

Difficulties in protecting intellectual property.


·

Burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.


·

Difficulty transferring funds to the U.S. in a tax efficient manner from non-U.Snon-U.S. jurisdictions in which the cash flow originates.


We are subject to risks associated with compliance with laws and regulations globally which may harm our business.


We are a global company subject to varied and complex laws, regulations and customs domestically and internationally. These laws and regulations relate to a number of aspects of our business, including trade protection, import and export control, sanctions laws, data and transaction processing security, payment card industry data security standards, records management, user-generated content hosted on websites we operate, corporate governance, employee and third-party complaints, gift policies, conflicts of interest, employment and labor relations laws, securities regulations and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment. The application of these laws and regulations to our business is often unclear and may at times conflict. Compliance with these laws and regulations may involve significant costs or require changes in our business practices that result in reduced revenue and profitability. Non-compliance could also result in fines, damages, or criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business, and damage to our reputation. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our global operations and could become subject to legal penalties if we fail to comply with local laws and regulations in U.S. jurisdictions or in foreign countries, which laws and regulations may be substantially different from those in the U.S.

In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. regulations applicable to us, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, including those based in or from countries where practices that violate such U.S. laws may be customary, will not take actions in violation of our internal policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our internal policies, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our interaction with foreign parties can also increase our costs with respect to compliance. For example, the EU has recently adopted a comprehensive overhaul of its data protection regime from the current national legislative approach to a single European Economic Area Privacy Regulation, the GDPR, which came into effect in May 2018. The EU data protection regime extends the scope of the EU data protection law to all foreign companies processing data of EU residents. Although the GDPR will apply across the EU without a need for local implementing legislation, as has been the case under the current data protection regime, local data protection authorities (“DPAs”) will still have the ability to interpret the GDPR, which has the potential to create inconsistencies on a country-by-country basis. Since we act as a data processor for our SaaS clients, we are taking steps to cause our processes to be compliant with applicable portions of the GDPR, but we cannot assure you that such steps will be effective. We have adopted policies to comply with the GDPR, but ongoing implementation and maintenance of compliance regimes could require changes to certain of our business practices, thereby increasing our costs.

27

A number of U.S. states have enacted data privacy and security laws and regulations that govern the collection, use, disclosure, transfer, storage, disposal, and protection of sensitive personal information, such as social security numbers, financial information and other personal information. For example, several U.S. territories and all 50 states now have data breach laws that require timely notification to individual victims, and at times regulators, if a company has experienced the unauthorized access or acquisition of sensitive personal data. Other state laws include the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which was signed into law on June 28, 2018 and largely took effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA, among other things, contains new disclosure obligations for businesses that collect personal information about California residents and affords those individuals new rights relating to their personal information that may affect our ability to use personal information or share it with our business partners. Regulations from the California Attorney General have not been finalized, and it is expected that additional amendments to the CCPA will be introduced in 2020. Meanwhile, other states have considered privacy laws like the CCPA.

Failure to comply with existing or future privacy and data use and security laws, regulations, and requirements to which we are subject or could become subject, including by reason of inadvertent disclosure of confidential information, could result in fines, sanctions, penalties or other adverse consequences and loss of consumer confidence, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, overall business and reputation especially since we market our products as a means by which compliance can be achieved.

Failure to maintain proper and effective internal controls has affected, and could in the future affect, our ability to produce accurate financial statements which has resulted, and could in the future result, in the restatement of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 of our condensed consolidated financial statements orand for the three months ended March 31, 2017 (the “Restatement”), and such failure to maintain proper and effective internal controls could adversely affect our operating results, our ability to operate our business, and our stock price.


Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, which is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.


If we are unableGAAP. 

Failure to establish and maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures it could causehas caused us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, resultresulted in the restatement of our financial statements, harmharmed our operating results, subjectsubjected us to regulatory scrutiny and sanction, causeinvestigation, potentially caused investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, and havehad a negative effect on the market price for shares of our common stock. Failure to maintain our internal control over financial reporting could result in similar consequences in the future.

There are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud have occurred and may occur again in the future and not be detected.

The ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require us to identify material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, which is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our internal controls and disclosure controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefit of controls must be relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud in our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Further, controls can be circumvented by individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, such as growth of the company or increased transaction volume, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur in the future and not be detected.

28

In addition, discovery and disclosure of a material weakness, such as those material weaknesses we have previously discovered and disclosed, by definition, could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. Such an occurrence could discourage certain clients or suppliers from doing business with us and affect how our stock trades. This could, in turn, negatively affect our ability to access public debt or equity markets for capital.

The amount of income taxes we compute as payable on our income tax returns filed with the Internal Revenue Service and certain states could be challenged by those taxing authorities resulting in us paying more taxes than anticipated.


We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and taxing authorities in certain states. We prepare and file those returns based on our interpretations of the relevant tax code as to revenue to be reported and deductions and credits allowed. We use third-party experts to assist us in preparing our tax returns and computing our tax liabilities to help us ensure we pay the proper amount of tax due. Our tax returns are subject to examination by taxing authorities that could interpret the tax code in a different manner from us and conclude we are obligated to pay more taxes than we originally computed and paid. While we would defend the position taken on our tax returns as filed, a challenge from a taxing authority can be costly to defend with no assurance of a favorable outcome for us. In the event of an unfavorable result under these circumstances, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.



The amount of sales tax we collect on sales could be challenged by taxing authorities both in jurisdictions in which we have a corporate presence as well as by taxing authorities in areas where we have no corporate presence.


We collect and remit sales tax on sales in jurisdictions where we have a corporate or physical presence that results in an obligation to do so.  We sell our products to customers in numerous locations where we do not have a corporate or physical presence and, therefore, do not collect sales tax on those sales. States in which we collect sales tax could audit our activities and assess us with additional tax based on their interpreting the sales tax code differently than we interpret it. Various states in which we do not collect sales tax are aggressive in interpreting their sales tax codes in determining if a company with no apparent presence in those states is obligated to collect and remit sales taxes, particularly on sales made across the Internet. States where we do not collect sales tax could make an assertion that we should have been collecting sales tax and could assess us with that tax. While we would defend our position taken as to our obligation to collect sales tax and the amount of sales tax collected, a challenge from a taxing authority can be costly to defend with no assurance of a favorable outcome for us. In the event of an unfavorable result under these circumstances, our business, operating results and financial position could be harmed.


Risks Related to Stock Ownership


Our stock price is/is, and may continue to be, volatile.


The trading price of our common stock has been and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to certain factors, including:


·

U.S. and global economic conditions leading to general declines in market capitalizations, with such declines not associated with operating performance.


·

Quarter-to-quarter variations in results of operations.


·

Our announcements of new products.


·

Our announcements of acquisitions.acquisitions or divestitures.


·

Our announcements of significant new customersclients or contracts.


·

Our competitors’ announcements of new products.


·

Our product development or release schedule.


·

Changes in our management team.


·

General conditions in the software industry.


·

Investor perceptions and expectations regarding our products, plans and strategic position and those of our competitors and customers.clients.

29

In addition, the public stock markets experience extreme price and trading volume volatility, particularly in high-technology sectors of the market. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies for reasons often unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. The broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.


Accounting charges may cause fluctuations in our annual or quarterly financial results.


Our financial results may be affected by non-cash and other accounting charges, including:


·

Amortization of intangible assets, including acquired technology and product rights.


·

Acquisition or financing expenses.


·

Impairment of goodwill and intangibles.


·

Share-based compensation expense.


·

Restructuring charges.


·

Impairment of long-lived assets.


·

Reserves for uncertain tax positions.


Anti-takeover provisions in our charter and Delaware law could inhibit others from acquiring us.


Some of the provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in Delaware law could, together or separately:


·

Discourage potential acquisition proposals.


·

Delay or prevent a change in control.


·

Limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.


In particular, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws prohibit stockholders from voting by written consent or calling meetings of the stockholders. We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any interested stockholder, as defined in the statute, for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an interested stockholder.


Our directors and executive officers continue to have substantial control over us.


Our directors and executive officers, together with their affiliates and related persons, beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 19%25% of our outstanding common stock as of March 1, 2017.February 29, 2020. These stockholders would have the ability to substantially control our operations and direct our policies, including the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, such as the election of directors and any acquisition or merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for our Board of Directors to be divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms.  As a result, approximately one-third of our Board of Directors will be elected each year.


Stockholders’ ownership of our stock may be significantly diluted as a result of the exercise of stock options, thereby affecting the value of the stock.


There were options to purchase 2,407,0051,563,784 shares of our common stock outstanding under our employee and director stock option plans as of December 31, 2016,2019, of which options to purchase 1,001,570348,979 shares were vested. We have filed a registration statementstatements under the Securities Act, covering stock issued upon the exercise of options by non-affiliates, and we may file a registration statement covering options held by affiliates as well. If we do not file a registration statement covering affiliates, affiliates who exercise their options may choose to sell the stock under an exemption from registration, such as Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The exercise of these options and sale of the resulting stock could depress the value of our stock.



Risks Related to Intellectual Property


We are vulnerable to claims that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights particularly because our products are partially developed by independent parties.


From time to time, we experience claims that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights. We may be exposed to future litigation based on claims that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of others. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that some of the code in our products is developed by independent parties or licensed from third parties over whom we have less control than we exercise over internal developers. In addition, we expect that infringement claims against software developers will become more prevalent as the number of products and developers grows and the functionality of software programs in the market increasingly overlaps. Companies in the technology industry, and other patent and trademark holders seeking to profit from royalties in connection with grants of licenses, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, we may be the target of aggressive and opportunistic enforcement of patents by third parties, including non-practicing entities.


Responding to and defending against such claims may cause us to incur significant expense and divert the time and efforts of our management and employees. Successful assertion of such claims could require that we pay substantial damages or ongoing royalty payments, prevent us from selling our products and services, damage our reputation, or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms, any of which could materially harm our business. In addition, we may decide to pay substantial settlement costs in connection with any claim or litigation, whether or not successfully asserted.


While it is not possible to predict the outcome of patent litigation incidents to our business, defense costs may be significant, and we believe the costs associated with this litigation or other claims of infringement could generally have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Regardless of the merit of such claims, responding to infringement claims can be expensive and time-consuming.


For any intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers,clients, we may have to pay damages and indemnify our customersclients against damages.


Claims of infringement could require us to re-engineer our products or seek to obtain licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our products in a manner that may include licensing technologies from others. In addition, an adverse legal decision affecting our intellectual property, or the use of significant resources to defend against this type of claim could place a significant strain on our financial resources and harm our reputation.


We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights.


Our software code and trade and service marks are some of our most valuable assets. Given the global nature of the Internet and our business, we are vulnerable to the misappropriation of this intellectual property, particularly in foreign markets, such as China and Eastern Europe, where laws or law enforcement practices are less developed. The global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination or security of our software making it more likely that unauthorized third parties will copy certain portions of our proprietary information or reverse engineer the proprietary information used in our programs. If our proprietary rights were infringed by a third-party and we did not have adequate legal recourse, our ability to earn profits, which are highly dependent on those rights, would be severely diminished.


Other companies may own, obtain or claim trademarks that could prevent, limit or interfere with our use of our trademarks.


Our various trademarks are important to our business. If we were to lose the use of any of our trademarks, our business wouldcould be harmed and we wouldcould have to devote substantial resources towards developing an independent brand identity. Defending or enforcing our trademark rights at a local and international level could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Risks Related to the Investigation and the Restatement

Matters relating to or arising from our Audit Committee investigation, including regulatory proceedings, litigation matters and potential additional expenses, may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

As previously disclosed in our public filings, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has recently completed the investigation relating to revenue recognition. We are also the subject of an investigation by the SEC and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas related to these matters.

We have incurred significant expenses related to legal, accounting, and other professional services in connection with the Audit Committee investigation and related matters and related remediation efforts. The expenses incurred, and expected to be incurred, in connection with the Audit Committee and government investigations, the impact of our delay in 2017 and through June 14, 2018 in meeting our periodic reporting requirements on the confidence of investors, employees and clients, and the diversion of the attention of the management team that has occurred, and is expected to continue, has adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition and results of operations or cash flows.

As a result of the matters reported above, we are exposed to greater risks associated with litigation, regulatory proceedings and government enforcement actions. In addition, we have incurred significant legal expenses in connection with a securities class action that was filed against us and certain of our directors and officers, which the Court gave final approval of a settlement on December 18, 2018. The Company has also received stockholder demand letters related to the above matters, and the Board has established a Special Litigation Committee to analyze and investigate claims that could be potentially asserted against the Company. Any future investigations or additional lawsuits may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are also subject to claims, investigations and proceedings arising out of the restatement of our previously issued financial results. For additional information regarding this litigation, see Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of this Annual Report.

The restatement of our previously issued financial results has resulted in private litigation and could result in private litigation judgments that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to shareholder litigation relating to the restatement of our previously filed financial statements and to certain of our previous public disclosures. For additional discussion of this litigation, see Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”, of this Annual Report. Our management has been, and may in the future be, required to devote significant time and attention to this litigation, and this and any additional matters that arise could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition as well as on our reputation. While we cannot estimate our potential exposure in these matters at this time, we have already incurred significant expense defending this litigation and expect to continue to need to incur significant expense in the defense.

The existence of the litigation may have an adverse effect on our reputation with our clients, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We face risks related to an ongoing Securities and Exchange Commission investigation.

On January 11, 2018, we received a subpoena from the SEC which has since opened a formal investigation relating to, among other things, the Restatement (the “SEC Investigation”). See Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of this Annual Report for a discussion of the SEC Investigation. We are cooperating fully with the SEC Investigation. At this point, we are unable to predict what the outcome of the SEC Investigation may be or what, if any, consequences the SEC Investigation may have with respect to the Company or any current or former Company personnel. However, the SEC Investigation could result in considerable legal expenses, divert management’s attention from other business concerns and harm our business. If the SEC were to determine that legal violations occurred, we could be required to pay significant civil and/or criminal penalties and/or other amounts and we could become subject to a cease and desist order and/or other remedies or conditions imposed as part of any resolution. We can provide no assurances as to the outcome of the SEC Investigation.

We face risks related to an ongoing investigation by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas.

On May 31, 2018, we were served with a subpoena issued by a grand jury sitting in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (the “Grand Jury Subpoena”). The Grand Jury Subpoena requests all documents and emails relating to the Company’s investigation of the potential improper recognition of software license revenue. We intend to fully cooperate with the Grand Jury Subpoena and related investigation being conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas (the “U.S. Attorney’s Investigation”). At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs of the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation. We are also unable to predict what, if any, further action may be taken in connection with the Grand Jury Subpoena and the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation, or what, if any, penalties, sanctions or remedial actions may be sought. Any determination by the U.S. Attorney’s office that the Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

Our indemnification obligations and limitations of our director and officer liability insurance may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Under Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and certain indemnification agreements to which we are a party, we have an obligation to indemnify, or we have otherwise agreed to indemnify, certain of our current and former directors and officers with respect to current and future investigations and litigation, including the matters discussed in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of this Annual Report. In connection with some of these pending matters, we are required to, or we have otherwise agreed to, advance, and have advanced, legal fees and related expenses to certain of our current and former directors and officers and expect to continue to do so while these matters are pending. Certain of these obligations are not and may not be “covered matters” under our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, or there may be insufficient coverage available. Further, in the event the directors and officers are ultimately determined not to be entitled to indemnification, we may not be able to recover the amounts we previously advanced to them.

In addition, we have incurred significant expenses in connection with the Audit Committee’s independent investigation, the pending SEC Investigation, the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation and shareholder litigation. We cannot provide any assurances that past or future claims related to those or other matters, including the cost of fees, penalties or other expenses, will not exceed the limits of our insurance policies, that such claims are covered by the terms of our insurance policies or that our insurance carrier will be able to cover our claims. Additionally, to the extent there is coverage of these claims, the insurers also have and may seek to deny or limit coverage in some or all of these matters. Furthermore, the insurers could become insolvent and unable to fulfill their obligation to defend, pay or reimburse us for insured claims. Accordingly, we cannot be sure that claims will not arise that are in excess of the limits of our insurance or that are not covered by the terms of our insurance policy. Due to these coverage limitations, we may incur significant unreimbursed costs to satisfy our indemnification obligations, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments


None.


ItemItem 2. Properties


Our corporate office is in San Antonio, Texas. That office contains approximately 21,000 square feet for which the average annual rent under the current lease is $347,000.$462,000. This lease expires April 30, 2029. We believe these facilities are suitable for our current business needs and that suitable, additional space would be available if needed in the future under acceptable terms.


ItemItem 3. Legal Proceedings

On October 12, 2018 and November 30, 2018, the Company received letters (the “Litigation Demand Letters”) from two stockholders demanding that the Company take action to remedy alleged harm caused to the Company, including to remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current and/or former directors and executive officers of the Company. The stockholders alleged, inter alia, that certain current and former directors and executive officers violated their fiduciary duties beginning at least in July 2016 by engaging in an illegal scheme to misrepresent the Company’s performance by falsely reporting accounts receivable, license revenue, total current assets and total assets, total stockholders’ equity, and total liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2016, causing the Company to suffer damages by overstating financial results for the fourth quarter of 2016.

33

The allegations referenced in the Litigation Demand Letters are related to the claims asserted in the securities class action Anthony Giovagnoli v. GlobalSCAPE, Inc., et. Al., Case No. 5:17-cv-00753, previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2017 (the “Prior Litigation”).

On November 7, 2018, a special litigation committee (“Special Litigation Committee”) consisting of Dr. Thomas Hicks and Frank Morgan was formed by the Board to analyze and investigate claims asserted in the October 12, 2018 Litigation Demand Letter and, subsequently, the November 30, 2018 Litigation Demand Letter, and consider claims that could potentially be asserted in stockholder derivative litigation related to facts connected to the claims and allegations in the Prior Litigation and the Litigation Demand Letters (the “Potential Derivative Litigation”). The Board charged the Special Litigation Committee with, among other things, determining what actions are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company, and determining whether it is in the best interests of the Company to pursue, dismiss, or consensually resolve any claims that may be asserted in the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Board determined that each member of the Special Litigation Committee is disinterested and independent with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation. Among other things, the Special Litigation Committee had been namedthe power to retain counsel and advisors, as oneappropriate, to assist it in the investigation, to gather and review relevant documents relating to the claims, to interview persons who may have knowledge of the relevant information, to prepare a numberreport setting forth its conclusions and recommended course of defendantsaction with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation, and to take any actions, including, without limitation, directing the filing and prosecution of litigation on behalf of the Company, as the Special Litigation Committee in its sole discretion deems to be in the best interests of the Company in connection with the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Board resolved that the Special Litigation Committee’s findings and determinations shall be final and not subject to review by the Board and in all respects shall be binding upon the Company.

Between November 2018 and March 2019, the Special Litigation Committee, with the assistance of outside legal counsel to the Special Litigation Committee, conducted an investigation of the Potential Derivative Litigation.

On March 28, 2019, the Special Litigation Committee reported that it had completed its investigation and delivered its recommendation to the Board that the Company should not pursue the Potential Derivative Litigation because, among other things, it would not be in the best interest of the Company to do so.

On April 18, 2019, outside counsel for the Special Litigation Committee informed the two stockholders that sent the Litigation Demand Letters of the Special Litigation Committee’s recommendation and informed the stockholders that the Company would not pursue the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Company is not aware of any subsequent litigation commenced by these two stockholders or any other stockholders concerning claims related to the Potential Derivative Litigation.

As disclosed in a patent infringement suitCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2018, the Fort Worth, Texas Regional Office of the SEC has opened a formal investigation of issues relating to the Restatement, with which the Company is cooperating fully.  At this time, the Company is unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs associated with the SEC’s investigation.  The Company is also unable to predict what, if any, action may be taken by Digital Regthe SEC, or what penalties or remedial actions the SEC may seek.  Any determination by the SEC that the Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of Texas, LLCfines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

On May 31, 2018, the Company was served with a subpoena issued by a grand jury sitting in the United States District Court for the EasternWestern District of Texas Tyler Division.(the “Grand Jury Subpoena”). The complaint allegedGrand Jury Subpoena requests all documents and emails relating to the Company’s investigation of the potential improper recognition of software license revenue. The Company intends to fully cooperate with the Grand Jury Subpoena and related investigation being conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas (the “U.S. Attorney’s Investigation”). At this time, the Company is unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs of the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation. The Company is also unable to predict what, if any, further action may be taken in connection with the Grand Jury Subpoena and the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation, or what, if any, penalties, sanctions or remedial actions may be sought. Any determination by the U.S. Attorney’s office that we infringedthe Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on a patent that regulates access to digital content. In February 2017, we settled this matter for an amount that was immaterial to ourthe Company’s consolidated financial position, andliquidity, or results of operations.


ItemItem 4. Mine Safety Disclosures


Not Applicable.








PART II

ItemItem 5.     Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity

Securities

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKTAmerican Exchange under the symbol “GSB”.

Price Range of Common Stock

The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low closing sale prices for our common stock for the last two fiscal years.


  2016  2015 
  High  Low  High  Low 
First Quarter (ending March 31) $4.08  $3.27  $3.67  $2.17 
Second Quarter (ending June 30) $4.00  $3.20  $3.49  $3.07 
Third Quarter (ending September 30) $3.87  $3.41  $3.56  $3.14 
Fourth Quarter (ending December 31) $4.18  $3.35  $4.28  $3.20 
                 
Annual  4.18   3.20   4.28   2.17 

  

2019

  

2018

 
  

High

  

Low

  

High

  

Low

 

First Quarter (ending March 31)

 $7.00  $4.39  $3.73  $3.33 

Second Quarter (ending June 30)

 $10.98  $6.25  $4.18  $3.54 

Third Quarter (ending September 30)

 $14.25  $8.20  $4.08  $3.23 

Fourth Quarter (ending December 31)

 $14.14  $9.10  $4.73  $3.88 
                 

Annual

 $14.25  $4.39  $4.73  $3.23 

On March 20, 2017,February 28, 2020, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NYSE MKTAmerican Exchange was $3.98$8.77 per share.  share.

Holders

As of March 20, 2017,February 29, 2020, we had approximately 1,7931,800 stockholders of record of our common stock.


stock.

Dividends

We paid quarterly dividends of $.015 per share on March 8, 2016,23, 2018, June 8, 2016, September 8,22, 2018, and December 8, 2016November 5, 2018 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 23, 2016, May 23, 2016March 9, 2018, June 8, 2018, and October 22, 2018, respectively. We paid quarterly dividends of $.015 per share on March 25, 2019, August 23,20, 2019 and December 2, 2019 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2019, August 6, 2019 and November 23, 2016,18, 2019, respectively. We paid a special dividend of $.50 and $3.35 per share on May 28, 2019 and December 5, 2019 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 13, 2019 and November 29, 2019, respectively. The timing and amount of dividends to be paid, if any, in subsequent quarters will be determined on future dates by the Board of Directors.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides aggregate information regarding grants under all equity compensation plans of GlobalSCAPE through December 31, 2019.

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

  

Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

  

Number of Securities Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding securities Reflected in Column (A)

 
  

(A)

  

(B)

  

(C)

 
             

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  1,563,784  $5.78   2,695,928 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

On November 18, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which is in addition to the approximately $640,000 remaining under the Company’s previous authorized repurchase program. Under the stock repurchase programs, the Company may repurchase shares through authorized Rule 10b5-1 plans (which permits the Company to repurchase shares when the Company might otherwise be precluded from doing so under insider trading laws), open market purchases, privately-negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act as amended.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data


·Method of Amortization of Deferred Revenue Related to M&S Agreements
·Method of Recording M&S Billings
·Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses
·Reclassification of Reserve for Uncertain Tax Position


Statement of Operations Data:               
($ in thousands except per share amounts)               
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012 
                
Total revenues $33,336  $30,735  $26,770  $24,339  $23,372 
Income (loss) from operations $5,818  $6,311  $4,615  $3,901  $(1,394)
Net income (loss) $3,951  $4,528  $3,026  $3,840  $(1,800)
                     
Net income (loss) per common share - basic $0.19  $0.22  $0.15  $0.21  $(0.10)
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted $0.18  $0.21  $0.15  $0.20  $(0.10)
                     
Cash dividends declared per share $0.060  $0.045  $0.050  $0.050  $0.070 

Balance Sheet Data:               
($ in thousands)               
  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012 
                
Total assets $50,180  $44,262  $38,387  $33,092  $33,588 
Long term debt, less current portion $-  $-  $-  $2,989  $4,389 
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, and related notes included elsewhere in this document.


Annual Report.

Overview


We develop and sell computer software that provides secure information exchange, data transfer and sharing capabilities for enterprises and consumers. We have been in business for overmore than twenty years and have sold our products to thousands of enterprises and more than one million individual consumers throughoutserve over 100 companies in the world.


Fortune 500.

Our primary business is selling and supporting managed file transfer, or MFT software for enterprises. The brand nameMFT software facilitates the transfer of ourdata from one location to another across a computer network within a single enterprise or between multiple computer networks in multiple enterprises.

Our MFT product platform is Enhanced File Transfer, or EFT.


We earn most of our revenue from the sale of EFT and products that are part ofbased upon our EFT platform. This on-premise and cloud-based delivery platform emphasizes secure and efficient data exchange for virtually any organization. It enables business partners, clients and employees to share critical information safely and securely. The EFT platform provides enterprise-level security while automating the integration of back-end systems which are features often missing from traditional file transfer software. The EFT platform features built-in regulatory compliance, governance, and visibility controls to maintain data safety and security. It can replace legacy systems, homegrown servers, expensive leased lines and virtual area networks. The EFT platform promotes ease of administration while providing the detailed capabilities necessary for complete control of a file transfer system.

We earn revenue fromcontinue to explore strategic alternatives to improve the sale of perpetual software licenses, providing products under software-as-a-service, or SaaS, subscriptions, providing maintenancemarket position and support services, or M&S, and offering professional services for product customization and integration.


We also sell other products that are synergistic to EFT including Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP. Collectively, these products constitute less than 10%profitability of our total revenue.

We focus on selling our EFT platform products in a business-to-business environment. The majority of the resources we will expendproduct offerings in the future for product research, development, marketingmarketplace, generate additional liquidity and sales will focus onenhance our EFT platform products.valuation. We believemay pursue our products and business capabilities are well-positioned to compete effectively in the market for MFT products.  goals through organic growth or other alternatives.

For a more comprehensive discussion of the products we sell and the services we offer, see “Business - Software Products and Services above.



Key Business Metrics


Key Business Metrics


We review a number of key business metrics on an ongoing basis to help us monitor our performance and to identify material trends which may affect our business. The significant metrics we review are described below.


Revenue Growth


We believe annual revenue growth is a key metric for monitoring our continued success in developing our business in future periods. Given our diverse solution portfolio, we regularly review our revenue mix and changes in revenue across all solutions on a regular basis to identify keyemerging trends.  We believe our revenue growth is primarily dependent upon executing our business strategies which include:


·Ongoing innovation of our EFT platform to address the expanding needs of our existing customers and enhancing our products’ appeal to new customers.

·Licensing, developing and/or acquiring technologies with features and functions that are complementary to and synergistic with our EFT platform so as to expand the breadth of our products offerings.

·Enhancing our sales and marketing programs to improve identification of potential demand for our products and to increase the rate at which we are successful in selling our products.

To support product innovation, we continue to enhance our software engineering group and our focus on optimizing the manner in which we assess the development of new technologies, our approach to managing those projects, and the timelines over which we do that work.

We remain alert for attractive opportunities to collaborate with others or perhaps combine other revenue-producing technologies with ours to expand our product offerings and reach. To that end, we continually assess products and services offered by others that might be synergistic with our existing products. We may elect to take advantage of those opportunities through cooperative marketing agreements or licensing arrangements or by acquiring an ownership position in the enterprise offering the opportunity.

In continuing to develop our demand generation activities, we have made and continue to make ongoing changes in sales and marketing including:
·Increasing sales staff capacity as needed to address our markets.
·Aligning our sales group to enhance its industry and geographic focus.
·Implementing new sales and marketing campaigns.
·Using third party digital marketing experts with search engine optimization expertise to enhance our efforts in this area.
·Evolving our lead generation programs to increase our sales staff’s exposure to potential purchasers.
·Enhancing our support of channel partners and engaging them to sell our products through training, orientation and marketing programs.
As part of growing revenue in total, we are focused on increasing license revenue both in terms of absolute dollars and as a percent of total revenue. When we sell our licensed products, we also typically create a recurring revenue stream from M&S since almost all purchasers of our licensed enterprise products also purchase an M&S contract. Most of our M&S contracts are for one year although we also sell multi-year contracts. The customer pays us the M&S fee for the entire term of the agreement at the time the contract begins. We recognize that amount as revenue ratably in future periods over the term of the contract.


We typically experience a high renewal rate for M&S services for our enterprise products so long as a customer continues using the licensed product they purchased from us. As a result, growing license revenue not only contributes to increasing revenue growth at the time the license is sold but also provides a foundation for future recurring revenue as the purchasers of our licensed products renew M&S agreements to support their ongoing product support needs. This pattern of activity can create a cumulative effect for M&S renewals as a result of the cumulative number of licensed software installations sold over multiple years that create M&S renewals in any single year predictably (and in line with our expectations) exceeding the number of new software licenses we sell in a single year. We expect this cumulative effect to continue to grow if we continue to increase enterprise software license revenue in future periods. For these reasons, we expect M&S revenue will remain a substantial part of our total revenue.

See Comparison of the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 2019 and 2015, 2018for a discussion of trends in our revenue growth that we monitor using this metric.


Bookings and Potential Future Revenue (Non-GAAP Measurement)

Bookings, along with the potential future revenue we may recognize from certain bookings (collectively referred to as bookings), is a business metric we use to measure the success of our sales and marketing programs and the effectiveness of our sales and marketing teams. Bookings arise from sales of software licenses, M&S, and professional services to our customers that consist of:

·Invoiced amounts for products and services we have delivered and for which we recognize revenue currently.
·Invoiced amounts for products and services we will deliver in the future and for which we will recognize revenue in those future periods.
·Statements of work under which customers have engaged us to deliver professional services which we will invoice and recognize as revenue in the future as we complete that work.

Bookings is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for revenue. Bookings has limitations as an analytical tool and when assessing our operating performance. Bookings should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for revenue or other income statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Our bookings trends and the reconciliation of revenue to bookings are as follows ($ in thousands):

  Year Ended December 31 
  2016  2015 
       
Revenue $33,336  $30,735 
Products and services sold for which we will recognize revenue at a future date when the goods and services are delivered to and accepted by the customer  27,785   20,034 
Products and services delivered to and accepted by the customer for which revenue recognition had been deferred in the past at the time of booking  (25,782)  (18,360)
Bookings $35,339  $32,409 

Our bookings yield revenue that we recognize at the time of the booking (for example, from the sale of an on-premise license to our products) as well as amounts for which we will recognize revenue in future periods (for example, from the sale of an M&S contract or from professional services to be rendered in the future). Accordingly when using bookings to measure the success of our sales and marketing programs and the effectiveness of our sales and marketing teams, we also assess the potential future revenue those bookings may yield. We compute that potential future revenue as the sum of:

·Deferred revenue on our balance sheet and
·Amounts we have billed and invoiced to our customers for M&S services on a date that is before the date we begin delivering those services (such amounts are not in accounts receivable or deferred revenue on our balance sheet), and
·Statements of work in place with customers under which we will provide professional services in the future.


Bookings during the year ended December 31, 2016, increased compared with the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to continuing development and introduction of new features and functions for our EFT product platform, enhanced marketing programs to increase our exposure and visibility to sales leads, and improved selling techniques to increase the likelihood of completing a sale when presented with a sales lead. We believe this increase is a leading indicator for potentially increased revenue in periods subsequent to 2016.

Our potential future revenue is as follows ($ in thousands):

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Deferred revenue on our balance sheet      
     Deferred revenue - current $13,655  $12,460 
     Deferred revenue – non current  3,790   3,808 
          Total deferred revenue  17,445   16,268 
Amounts billed and invoiced to customers for M&S services on a date that is before the contracted start date for those services (not part of deferred revenue)  381   206 
Statements of work for professional services to be provided in the future  411   1,445 
Total potential future revenue $18,237  $17,919 
Potential future revenue is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for revenue. Potential future revenue has limitations as an analytical tool and when assessing our operating performance. Potential future revenue should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for revenue or other income statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Measurement)


We utilize Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Total Other Income/Expense, Depreciation, Amortization other than amortization of capitalized software development costs, and Share-Based Compensation Expense) to provide us a view of income and expenses and cash flow from our operations that is supplemental and secondary to our primary assessment of net income as presented in our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income and of cash flow from operating activities as presented on our consolidated statement of cash flows.income. We use Adjusted EBITDA to provide another perspective for measuring profitability and cash flow from our core operating activities that does not include the effects of expenses that typically do not require us to pay them in the current period (such as depreciation, amortization and share-based compensation), the cost of financing our business, and the effects of income taxes, as well as the effects on our cash of changes in certain balance sheet items such as accounts receivable and accounts payable. following items:

Expenses that typically do not require us to pay them in cash in the current period (such as depreciation, amortization and share-based compensation);

The cost of financing our business; and

The effects of income taxes.

We monitor the components ofAdjusted EBITDA to assess our actual performance relative to our plans, budgetsintended strategies, expected patterns of action, and expectations andbudgets. We use the results of that assessment to adjust our future activities to the extent we deem necessary.


Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP.generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). It should not be considered as a substitute for net income presented on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income or for net cash provided by operating activities presented on our consolidated statement of cash flows.income. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and when assessing our operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or without a simultaneous reading and consideration of our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.



We compute Adjusted EBITDA as follows ($ in thousands):


  Year Ended 
  December 31 
  2016  2015 
Net Income $3,951  $4,528 
Add (subtract) items to determine adjusted EBITDA:        
Income tax expense  2,026   1,862 
Interest (income) expense, net  (159)  (78)
Depreciation and amortization:        
Total depreciation and amortization  2,045   1,553 
Amortization of capitalized software development costs  (1,777)  (1,283)
Stock-based compensation expense  973   647 
Adjusted EBITDA $7,059  $7,229 

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 
         
         

Net Income

 $13,267  $3,654 

Add (subtract) items to determine Adjusted EBITDA:

        

Income tax expense

  1,965   1,227 

Interest (income) expense, net

  265   (86)

Depreciation and amortization:

        

Total depreciation and amortization

  1,746   2,173 

Share-based compensation expense

  2,415   1,269 

Adjusted EBITDA

 $19,658  $8,237 

See Comparison of the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015 2019 and 2018for discussion of the variances between periods in the components comprising Adjusted EBITDA Excluding Infrequent Items.  Our adjusted EBITDA results indicate that we have been able to sustain consistently positive cash flow to help fund our future operations.


Solution Perspective and Trends

Our discussion of the business trends of our products is based on the following profile of our revenue components ($ in thousands):
  2016  2015 
     Percent of     Percent of 
  Amount  Total  Amount  Total 
             
Revenue By Type
            
License $11,984   35.9% $12,023   39.1%
M&S  18,668   56.0%  16,489   53.7%
Professional Services  2,684   8.1%  2,223   7.2%
Total Revenue $33,336   100.0% $30,735   100.0%
                 
Revenue by Product Line
                
License                
EFT Platform $10,978   91.6% $10,459   87.0%
Other  1,006   8.4%  1,564   13.0%
   11,984   100.0%  12,023   100.0%
M&S                
EFT Platform  17,432   93.4%  15,006   91.0%
Other  1,236   6.6%  1,483   9.0%
   18,668   100.0%  16,489   100.0%
                 
Professional Services (all EFT Platform)  2,684   100.0%  2,223   100.0%
                 
Total Revenue                
EFT Platform  31,094   93.3%  27,688   90.1%
Other  2,242   6.7%  3,047   9.9%
  $33,336   100.0% $30,735   100.0%



We earn revenue primarily from the following activities:

License revenue from sales of our EFT platform products that we deliver as either perpetually-licensed software installed at the customer’s premises, for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered, or as a cloud-based service under our EFT Cloud Services brand delivered using a SaaS model, for which we earn monthly subscription revenue as these services are delivered.
License revenue from sales of our Mail Express, WAFS and CuteFTP products that are installed at the customer’s premises under a perpetual license for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered.
M&S revenue under contracts to provide ongoing product support and software updates to our customers who have purchased license software which we recognize ratably over the contractual period, which is typically one year but can be up to three years.
Professional services revenue from a variety of customization, implementation, and integration services, as well as delivery of education and training associated with our solutions, which we recognize as the services are performed and accepted by the client.

We earn most of our revenue from the sale of our EFT platform products and the associated M&S and professional services related to those products. With our core competency being in products that address the MFT market, we believe our EFT platform products provide the best opportunity for our future growth. Accordingly, expansion of the capabilities of the EFT platform will be our primary focus in the future. While we will continue to sell and support our other products for the foreseeable future, they will not be an area of emphasis for us going forward.

We believe that continuing to offer licensed products installed on-premises for which we recognize revenue up-front and that carry with them a recurring M&S revenue stream is important to our future success. At the same time, we recognize that a migration of capabilities to a SaaS platform is attractive to a growing number of customers. We have, and have had for quite some time, the capabilities in place to deliver our EFT platform in that manner. However, this migration could create some near-term decreases in the growth rate of license revenue, and may result in similar decreases in future periods, because it typically takes approximately 24 to 36 months of SaaS revenue to yield total revenue equivalent to that realized up-front from the sale of a license for an on-premise installation.

In mid-2016, we reviewed the allocation of our product research and development resources across all of our products. As a result of that review, we decided to adjust that allocation to focus most of our engineering resources involved in product research and development on our EFT platform products in order to expand their capabilities and to remain positioned to be responsive to the evolving needs of our customers.

Over the past few years, we have developed and offered individual product lines that include EFT, Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP. Each of these product lines addresses distinct needs in the marketplace. While some customers purchase products from more than one of these product lines, for the most part, customers in a particular market or vertical have needs that are addressed by only one of these products and, therefore, purchase only that product. With respect to Mail Express, while we will continue to offer it as stand-alone product for the time being, the engineering resources we allocate to this technology will focus on migrating it to becoming an integrated component of our EFT platform. We do not expect to expend significant resources in the future on expanding the features and capabilities of WAFS and CuteFTP although we will continue to sell those products and support them.

To support product innovation, we continue to enhance our software engineering group and our focus on optimizing the manner in which we assess the development of new technologies, our approach to managing those projects, and the timelines over which we do that work. In continuing to develop our demand generation activities, we have made and continue to make ongoing changes in sales and marketing including:
·Increasing sales staffing and capabilities as needed to address our markets.
·Aligning our sales group to enhance its industry and geographic focus.
·Implementing new sales and marketing campaigns.
·Evolving our lead generation programs to increase our sales staff’s exposure to potential purchasers.
·Enhancing our support of channel partners and engaging them to sell our products through training, orientation and marketing programs.
Our total revenue increased 8.5% in 2016 and 14.8% in 2015. For a more complete discussion of these revenue trends, see Comparison of the Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and Comparison of the Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.


EBITDA.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Our cash and working capital positions were as follows (in($ in thousands):

  

December 31, 2019

  

December 31, 2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $4,702  $9,173 
         

Current assets

 $15,066  $17,351 

Current liabilities

  (22,602)  (15,483)

Working capital

 $(7,536) $1,868 

37

  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Cash and cash equivalents $8,895  $15,885 
Short term investments  2,754   3,254 
Long term investments  12,779   - 
Total cash, cash equivalents, short and long term investments $24,428  $19,139 
         
Working capital $2,936  $10,878 
Deferred revenue, current portion  13,655   12,460 
Working capital plus current deferred revenue (non-GAAP presentation) $16,591  $23,338 

Deferred revenue, unlike the other liability components of our working capital, is an obligation we will satisfy by providing services in the future to our customers as part of our ongoing operating activities from which we have historically generated cash flow. Our deferred revenue does not involve a disbursement of cash as a direct payment of that liability. Accordingly, we assess our working capital needs using both the GAAP computation that includes all current liabilities as well as assess it by excluding the current portion of deferred revenue. Working capital plus the current portion of deferred revenue is not a measure of financial position under GAAP, has limitations as an analytical tool and when assessing our financial position and should not be considered a substitute for working capital computed in accordance with GAAP.

Our capital requirements principally relate to our need to fund our ongoing operating expenditures, which are primarily related to employee salaries and benefits. We make these expenditures to enhance our existing products, develop new products, sell those products in the marketplace and support our customersclients after the sale.


We rely on cash and cash equivalents on hand and cash flows from operations to fund our operating activities and believe those items will be our principal sources of capital for the foreseeable future. If our revenue declines and/or our expenses increase, our cash flow from operations and cash on hand could decline.  We plan to expend significant resources in the future for research and development of our products and expansion and enhancement of our sales and marketing activities. If sales decline or if our liquidity is otherwise under duress, we could substantially reduce personnel and personnel-related costs, reduce or substantially eliminate capital expenditures and/or reduce or substantially eliminate certain research and development and sales and marketing expenditures. We may also sell equity or debt securities or enter into credit arrangements in order to finance future acquisitions or licensing activities, to the extent available.


Cash provided or used by our various activities consisted of the following ($ in thousands):


  Cash Provided (Used) During the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Operating activities $7,066  $7,021 
Investing activities $(13,880) $(2,119)
Financing activities $(176) $(375)

  

Cash Provided (Used) During the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Operating activities

 $17,339  $4,896 

Investing activities

 $(1,138) $14,356 

Financing activities

 $(20,672) $(21,662)

Our cash provided by operating activities increased during 20162019 compared to 20152018 primarily due to:


to the following factors set forth on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

·

Net income after considering adjustments to reconcile netitems not involving cash at the time they are recorded in the statement of operations and comprehensive income, to net cash provided by operating activities, as set forth on our Consolidated StatementsStatement of Cash Flow,Flows, increasing from $6.5$17.5 million in 20152019 as compared to $7.1increasing $7.0 million in 2016.2018. See the section below under Comparison of the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2016, to Year Ended December 31, 2015,2019 and 2018 for a discussion of the changes in the components of these amounts.


·

Deferred revenue increasing $1.2 million during 2016$2,018,000 in 2019 as compared to decreasing $813,000 in 2018 due primarily to increasing the resources dedicated to securing M&S renewals.

Accrued expenses increasing $384,000 in 2019 as compared to decreasing $457,000 in 2018 due primarily to an increase in personnel related costs in 2019.

Prepaid expenses and other decreasing $155,000 in 2019 as compared to increasing $708,000 during 2015$216,000 in 2018 due primarily due to 2016 having a larger number of renewals of multi-year M&S agreements than occurredthe reduction in 2015. Since we collect payment for the full term of an M&S agreement at the beginning of the agreement, we generally receive larger cash payments at the beginning of a multi-year agreement than we receive at the beginning of a comparable single year agreement.receivable from our D&O insurance in 2019.

·

Accounts payable increasing $37,000decreasing $74,000 in 20162019 as compared to decreasing $272,000 during 2015 primarily due to a higher use of third-party software developers$1,080,000 in 2015 compared to 2016 for which extended payment terms were generally not available. The remainder of variations in accounts payable in 2016 compared to 2015 was2018 due to normal variationsvariants in the timing of payments to our vendors.

Offset by:

·

Federal income tax receivable decreasing $352,000increasing $1,907,000 in 20162019 as compared to federal income tax payable increasing $233,000$970,000 in 20152018 due primarily to the Internal Revenue Service completing its examination of certain of our federal incomeincreased estimated tax returns for certain prior years and refunding to us in 2016 taxes paid in prior years. The remainder of the change was due to our taxable income being lower for 2016 than for 2015 and normal variations in the timing of our tax payments.


Offset by

·Accounts receivable increasing $1.2 million during 2016 compared to remaining relatively unchanged during 2015 as a result of there being an increased number of larger transactions in the fourth quarter of 2016 as comparedpayments related to the fourth quarter of 2015 for which payment was not due until 2017.increase in taxable income.

·Accrued expenses decreasing $58,000 in 2016 compared to increasing $303,000 in 2015 due primarily to normal variations in the timing of our payroll payment dates relative to the date of the balance sheet presented as part of our financial statements.
·Other assets increasing $185,000 during 2016 as compared to decreasing $40,000 during 2015 primarily due to a prepayment in 2016 of a group healthcare premium related to 2017 as a result of a change in our healthcare insurance provider.

The increased useamount of cash we used for investing activities during 20162019 decreased as compared to 2015 was2018 due primarily to:

The redemption of our certificates of deposit in 2018 for which no comparable event occurred in 2019.

Offset by:

A decrease in capitalized software development costs due to fewer employed software engineers and technical personnel.

Financing activities used less cash during 2019 than during 2018 primarily due to refiningthe funding of our cash management policiescredit facility, a reduction in the purchase of treasury stock related to the Dutch tender offer in 2018 that resultedwas not repeated in our purchasing higher levels2019 and an increase in the proceeds received from the exercise of short term and long term certificates of deposit during 2016 as compared to 2015,stock options, offset by a decrease in our software development costs that were capitalized.  While the scope and magnitudefunding of our software development activitiesspecial dividends and payment of debt issuance costs.

Loan Agreement

In November 2019, we entered into a credit facility with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A, as Administrative Agent and East West Bank as Syndication Agent consisting of a $50.0 million term loan and a $5 million revolving agreement (the “Loan Agreement”). Funds from the term loan were substantially used to fund a special dividend of $3.35 to our common shareholders which was paid on December 5, 2019. The revolving loan may be accessed to fund working capital needs. The loans bear a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus a Term Loan Spread between 3.75% and 2.25%. The amount of the same between these periods,Term Loan Spread is a function of the costCompany’s Leverage Ratio. Effective January 3, 2020, the Company entered into an Amendment and Waiver No. 1 to the Credit Agreement to increase the amount of that workthe special dividend permitted to be paid to stockholders on December 5, 2019 to accommodate last minute option exercises and to exclude the May 28, 2019 special dividend from the fixed charges calculation.

At December 31, 2019, the principal balance outstanding under the term note payable was less in 2016 compared to 2015 due to increased use$49.4 million and the balance of the revolving note payable was zero.

The aggregate maturities of our employeesnotes payable, as of December 31, 2019, are as follows: $5.0 million in 2020, $7.5 million in 2021, $7.5 million in 2022, $10.0 million in 2023, and $19.4 million in 2024.

Interest payments under the credit facility are due monthly. Principal payments are due quarterly. The loans may be prepaid at any time without penalty. 

The Loan Agreement contains the following financial covenants:

●     We must not exceed a Total Leverage Ratio of 3.25%. This ratio decreases to do3.0% at September 30, 2020, 2.75% at March 31, 2021 and 2.25% at March 31, 2022. This ratio is defined in the Loan Agreement as the ratio of (a) consolidated total funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA minus capitalized software expenditures for the period of the four most recent consecutive fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2019, this workdebt service coverage ratio was 2.58.

●     We must maintain a Fixed Coverage Charge Ratio of 1.25%. This ratio is defined in 2016 comparedthe Loan Agreement as the ratio of (a) consolidated EBITDA minus unfinanced capital expenditures to 2015 when we relied more oncash interest expense plus scheduled principal payments made plus taxes paid in cash plus restricted payments made in cash. As of December 31, 2019, this debt to tangible net worth ratio was 4.01.

The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants relating to maintaining legal existence and good standing, complying with applicable laws, delivery of financial statements, payment of taxes and maintaining insurance. The Loan Agreement also contains customary events of default including the usefailure to make payments of higher cost, third-party software developers.


The decreased useprincipal and interest, the breach of cash for financing activities during 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to:

·An increase in cash received from the exercise of stock options during 2016 as a result of us recruiting more experienced personnel with broader capabilities that in turn resulted in more people departing the Company in 2016 than in 2015 which resulted in more stock options being exercised before reaching their post-employment expiration date.

Offset by

·An increase in cash paid for dividends due to the payment of four quarterly dividends in 2016 as compared to the payment of three quarterly dividends in 2015.
any covenants, the occurrence of a material adverse change, and certain bankruptcy and insolvency events.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments


At December 31, 2016,2019, our contractual obligations and commitments consisted primarily of the following items:


·

Obligations outstanding under the loan agreement described above. An obligation to deliver services in the future to satisfy our right to earn our deferred revenue of $17.4$18.3 million. Those future services primarily relate to our obligations to under M&S contracts. We will recognize this deferred revenue as revenue over the remaining life of those contracts which generally ranges from one to three years. Deferred revenue, unlike the other liability components of our working capital, is an obligation we will satisfy through providing services in the future to our customersclients as part of our ongoing operating activities from which we have historically generated cash flow. Our deferred revenue does not involve a disbursement of cash as a direct payment of that liability.


·

Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities which include our contractual obligations to pay software royalties to third parties that vary in amount based on our sales volume of products upon which royalties are payable.

·

Operating lease for our office space.

·

Federal and state taxes.


Our non-cancellable, contractual obligations at December 31, 2016, consisted of the following (in thousands):

  Amounts Due for the Period 
  Fiscal Years 
  2017  2018 - 2020  Thereafter  Total 
              
Operating leases $360  $480  $-  $840 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, has issued the following Accounting Standard Updates (ASU) that we believe may be relevant to our business and to the preparation of our financial statements:

ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (issued January 2017) - To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, Step 2 was eliminated from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity was required to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. Any loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. This update also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. An entity is required to disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. A public business entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filer is required to adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We expect that the application of the provisions of this update will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (issued June 2016) - Among the provisions of this ASU is a requirement that assets measured at amortized cost, which includes trade accounts receivable, be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This pronouncement requires that an entity reflect all of its expected credit losses based on current estimates which will replace the current standard requiring that an entity need consider only past events and current conditions in measuring an incurred loss. We are subject to this guidance effective with financial statements we issue for the year ending December 31, 2020, and the quarterly periods during that year. We do not expect the amounts we report as accounts receivable in those future periods under this guidance to be materially affected relative to current guidance.

ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (issued March 2016) - When implemented, this standard will discontinue the recording in equity of tax benefits or tax deficiencies that arise from differences between share-based payment compensation expense recorded for financial statement purposes and that expense deductible for tax purposes. This new standard requires that the tax effect of all such differences be recorded and reported in the statement of operations. This standard also requires that tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows which is a change from the current requirement to present such tax-related items as an inflow from financing activities and an outflow from operating activities. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annual financial statements for 2017. The extent of the effect of this standard on our financial statements for 2017 and later depends upon the level of stock option exercise activity we experience in 2017 and later. The amounts involved in accounting for tax benefits or deficiencies from share-based compensation that are the subject of ASU 2016-09 are presented in our 2016 and earlier consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity on lines that are captioned tax benefit or tax deficiency from share-based compensation.


ASU 2016-02, Leases (issued February 2016). The main difference between existing GAAP and this ASU 2016-02 is the presentation by lessees on their

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 “Significant Accounting Policies” of our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report which includes a discussion of lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases. Since this new standard retains the distinction between finance and operating leases, the effect of leases in the statement of operationsrecent accounting pronouncements and the statement of cash flows will be largely unchanged from existing GAAP. Our only lease of significance is our operating lease for our corporate office space for which we will present a right-to-use asset and a lease liabilityimpact they may have on our balance sheet when we implement this standard. We are in the process of determining those amounts. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annualconsolidated financial statements for 2019. The extent of the effect of this standard on our financial statements for 2019 and later will depend upon the leases, if any, that we have in effect at that date.


ASU 2015-17, Income Tax: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (issued November 2015) – This pronouncement requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities for a tax jurisdiction, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. We have implemented this ASU in the accompanying financial statements in the manner described in the Note 9 below.
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (issued May 2014) - The core principle of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are subject to this guidance effective with financial statements we issue for the year ending December 31, 2018, and the quarterly periods during that year. We do not expect the application of this ASU to have a material effect on the amounts or timing of revenue we report in those future periods relative to current guidance.

We believe the application of ASU 2014-09 will result in a change in the manner in which we record sales commission expense related to M&S contracts. Currently, we record the full amount of the sales commission paid on the full value of an M&S contract as an expense on the inception date of the M&S contract. We believe that under ASU 2014-09, we will record that commission expense ratably over the term of the M&S contract. We have not yet quantified the effect of this change, but we do not expect that effect to be material to our results of operations or financial position.

statements.

Critical Accounting Policies


We follow accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. This board sets generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, thatwhich we follow in preparing financial statements that report our financial position, results of operations, and sources and uses of cash. We also follow the reporting regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. It is possible the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of our financial position and results of operations.


Principles

For a description of Consolidation


The accompanyingour critical accounting policies, please refer to Note 2 “Significant Accounting Policies” of our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Results of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (collectively referred to as Operations

Comparison of the “Company” or “we”) are prepared in conformity with GAAP.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.


Changes in Accounting Methods, Reclassifications and Revisions

As partConsolidated Statements of our ongoing enhancement and refinement of our financial reporting to fairly present our results of operations and financial position, we may make changes from time-to-time in accounting methods and in the classification and presentation of our business activities in our financial statements. To ensure comparability between periods, we revise previous period financial statements presented to conform them to the method of presentation in our current period financial statements. If the changes increase or decrease previously reported amounts of revenue or expenses, we adjust retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presentedOperations for the cumulative effect, if any, on that balance.  If these changes affect our financial statements for previously reported interim periods not presented herein, we present revised financial statements for those periods when they are reported in the future.


In preparing our financial statements as of December 31, 2016, we changed our method of accounting in the areas described below. We believe these new methods enhance our financial reporting. We believe these changes are not material to our financial statements taken as a whole and, as a result, believe it is not probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying upon our previously issued financial statements would have been changed or influenced had these new methods been in place at the time those financial statements were first issued.  See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this annual report for illustration of the effect of these changes on amounts previously reported in our financial statements as of December 31, 2015, and for the year then ended.

Amortization of Deferred Revenue Related to M&S Agreements

In previously issued financial statements, we amortized deferred revenue related to M&S agreements by recording a full month of amortization in the first month of an agreement. We used that method based on our intent to match revenue from our M&S agreements to the expense we incur when delivering M&S services. We acknowledge that the more common and widespread practice is to amortize deferred revenue based upon the specific number of days the M&S agreement is in place during that month.. Both methods result in the recognition of the same amount of revenue over the term of the M&S agreement but yield differing amounts of revenue being recognized in the first month and last month of an M&S agreement.

Our consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets included herein are now prepared using the specific number of days method. This change had the effect of decreasing M&S revenue and net income on our statements of operations for 2015 and 2016 by immaterial amounts. It increased the amount of our deferred revenue on our balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2016, which will result in our reporting more revenue in periods subsequent to 2016 than we would have reported under the previous method. This change has no effect on the total amount of revenue we will realize from our M&S contracts.

Recording M&S Billings

We may invoice a customer for M&S to be provided commencing on a date in a month subsequent to the month in which we invoice the customer. We typically receive a purchase order from our customers for M&S prior to invoicing them, and it is not uncommon for a customer to pay us in advance of that M&S commencement date either on their own or when we request such payment. Accordingly, we previously recorded an account receivable and deferred revenue for these invoices as of the date of the invoice. We believe a reasonable, alternate and more conservative method is to wait until the commencement date of the M&S has arrived to record the account receivable and deferred revenue for any such invoices for which we have not been paid as of the balance sheet date. Accordingly, our consolidated balance sheets included herein are now prepared using that method.

Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses

We employ sales engineers who assist our sales staff in addressing technical considerations by our customers prior to them purchasing our product. Our use of sales engineers has expanded in recent quarters. Prior to 2016, we classified the expense of sales engineers as part of costs of revenue – professional services. We believe these expenses are now more appropriately classified as part of sales and marketing expense and have now classified them as such.

Reclassification of Reserve for Uncertain Tax Position

We maintain a reserve for uncertain tax positions. Previously, we classified that reserve as a current liability since it was not material to our financial statements taken as a whole. In assessing the materiality of this reserve as of December 31, 2016, we determined it appropriate to classify it as a component of other long term liabilities.
Revenue Recognition

We develop, market and sell software products. We recognize revenue from a sale transaction when the following conditions are met:

·Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.
·Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered.
·The amount of the sale is fixed or determinable.
·Collection of the sale amount is reasonably assured.

For a sale transaction not meeting any one of these four criteria, we defer recognition of revenue related to that transaction until all the criteria are met.

We earn the majority of our software license revenue from software products sold under perpetual software license agreements. At the time our customers purchase these products, they typically also purchase a product maintenance and support, or M&S, agreement. These transactions are multiple element software sales for which we assess the presence of vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value of the undelivered elements to determine the portion of these sales to recognize as revenue upon delivery of the software product and the portion of these sales to record as deferred revenue at the time the product is delivered. We amortize the deferred revenue component to revenue in future periods as we deliver the related future services to the customer. For transactions, if any, for which we cannot establish VSOE of the fair value of the undelivered elements, we initially record the entire transaction as deferred revenue and amortize that amount to revenue in future periods as we deliver the related future services to the customer.
We provide services under M&S agreements with terms generally ranging from one to three years. We require up-front payment of our M&S fee in an amount that covers the entire term of the agreement.  We record as deferred revenue amounts due or paid that relate to future periods during which we will provide the M&S service. Deferred revenue related to services we will deliver within one year is presented as a current liability while deferred revenue related to services that we will deliver more than one year into the future is presented as a non-current liability. We reduce deferred revenue and recognize revenue ratably in future periods as we deliver the M&S service.
For our products licensed and delivered under a software-as-a-service transaction on a monthly or other periodic subscription basis, we recognize subscription revenue, including initial setup fees, on a monthly basis ratably over the contractual term of the customer contract as we deliver our products and services.
We provide professional services to our customers consisting primarily of software installation support, operations support and training. We recognize revenue from these services as they are completed and accepted by our customers.
We collect sales tax on many of our sales. We do not include sales tax collected in our revenue. We record it as a liability payable to taxing authorities.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Short Term Investments

Short-term investments consist of certificates of deposit held with financial institutions with contractual maturity dates less than one year from the balance sheet date.  The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates and therefore accounts for them as held-to-maturity. These certificates of deposit are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value of these investments.

Long-Term Investments

Long-term investments consist of certificates of deposit held with financial institutions with contractual maturity dates greater than one year from the balance sheet date. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates and therefore accounts for them as held-to-maturity. These certificates of deposit are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value of these investments.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is comprised of furniture and fixtures, software, computer equipment and leasehold improvements which are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.    Furniture, fixtures and equipment have a useful life of five to seven years, computer equipment and software have a useful life of three years and leasehold improvements have a useful life that is the shorter of the term of the lease under which the improvements were made or the estimated useful life of the asset.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.


Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized. On at least an annual basis, we test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level using December 31 as the measurement date. We operate as a single reporting unit.
When testing goodwill, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing this qualitative assessment, we assess events and circumstances relevant to us including, but not limited to:

Macroeconomic conditions.
Industry and market considerations.
Cost factors and trends for labor and other expenses of operating our business.
Our overall financial performance and outlook for the future.
Trends in the quoted market value and trading of our common stock.
In considering these and other factors, we consider the extent to which any adverse events and circumstances identified could affect the comparison of our reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. We place more weight on events and circumstances that most affect our reporting unit’s fair value or the carrying amount of our net assets. We consider positive and mitigating events and circumstances that may affect our determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. We evaluate, on the basis of the weight of the evidence, the significance of all identified events and circumstances in the context of determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.
If, after assessing the totality of these qualitative events and circumstances, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we conclude there is no impairment of goodwill and perform no further testing in accordance with GAAP. If we conclude otherwise, we proceed with performing the first step, and if necessary, the second step, of the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by GAAP.

As of December 31, 2016, after assessing the totality of the relevant events and circumstances, we determined it not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. Accordingly, we concluded there was no impairment of goodwill as of that date. There have been no material events or changes in circumstances since that time indicating that the carrying amount of goodwill may exceed its fair market value and that interim testing needed to be performed.

Capitalized Software Development Costs
When we complete research and development for a software product and have in place a program plan and a detailed program design or a working model of that software product, we capitalize production costs incurred for that software product from that point forward until it is ready for general release to the public. Thereafter, we amortize capitalized software production costs to expense using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of that product, which is generally three years. We periodically assess the carrying value of capitalized software development costs relative to our estimates of realizability through sales of products in the marketplace.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue consists of expenses associated with the production, delivery and support of the products and services we sell. Cost of license revenue consists primarily of amortization of the capitalized software development costs we incur when producing our software products, royalties we pay to use software developed by others for certain features of our products, and fees we pay to third parties who provide services supporting our SaaS and cloud-based subscription solutions. Cost of M&S revenue and cost of professional services revenue consist primarily of salaries and related costs of our employees and third parties we use to deliver these services.
Research and Development
We expense research and development costs as incurred.

Advertising Expense

We expense advertising costs as incurred as a component of our sales and marketing expenses.

Share-Based Compensation

We measure the cost of share-based payment transactions at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award. We recognize this cost as an expense ratably over the recipient’s requisite service period during which that award vests or becomes unrestricted.

For stock option awards, we estimate their fair value at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model considering the following factors:

We estimate expected volatility based on historical volatility of our common stock.
We use primarily the simplified method to derive an expected term which represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. We use this method because our options are plain-vanilla options, and we believe our historical option exercise experience is not adequately indicative of our future expectations.
We base the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
We estimate a dividend yield based on our historical and expected future dividend payments.

For restricted stock awards, we use the quoted price of our common stock on the grant date as the fair value of the award.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method.  We record deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount for financial reporting purposes, as measured by the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are carried on the balance sheet with the presumption that they will be realizable in future periods in which we generate taxable income.

We assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. Based on this assessment, we provide any necessary valuation allowance on our balance sheet with a corresponding increase in the tax provision on our statement of operations.   Any valuation allowances we establish are determined based upon a number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various domestic jurisdictions in which we operate.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes using a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, we evaluate the tax position to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, we assess the tax position to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit we recognize is the largest amount that we believe has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits represent tax positions for which reserves have been established.

Earnings Per Share

We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods.  We compute diluted earnings per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.

Awards of non-vested options are considered potentially dilutive common shares for the purpose of computing earnings per common share.  We apply the treasury stock method to non-vested options under which the assumed proceeds include the amount the employee must pay to exercise the option plus the amount of unrecognized cost attributable to future periods less any expected tax benefits.


Results of Operations

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015

  2016  2015  $ Change 
  ($ in thousands) 
Total revenues $33,336  $30,735  $2,601 
Cost of revenues  6,322   5,288   1,034 
Gross profit  27,014   25,447   1,567 
Operating expenses            
Sales and marketing  11,682   10,406   1,276 
General and administrative  6,975   6,168   807 
Research and development  2,539   2,562   (23)
Total operating expenses  21,196   19,136   2,060 
Income from operations  5,818   6,311   (493)
Other income (expense), net  159   78   81 
Provision for income taxes  2,026   1,861   165 
Net Income $3,951  $4,528  $(577)
2019 and2018

  

2019

  

2018

  

$ Change

 
  

($ in thousands)

 

Total revenues

 $40,343  $34,416  $5,927 

Cost of revenues

  6,130   6,236   (106)

Gross profit

  34,213   28,180   6,033 

Operating expenses

            

Sales and marketing

  8,331   10,009   (1,678)

General and administrative

  7,495   6,382   1,113 

Legal & Professional

  1,520   4,623   (3,103)

Severance

  15   488   (473)

Research and development

  1,355   1,883   (528)

Total operating expenses

  18,716   23,385   (4,669)

Income from operations

  15,497   4,795   10,702 

Other income (expense), net

  (265)  86   (351)

Provision for income taxes

  1,965   1,227   738 

Net Income

 $13,267  $3,654  $9,613 

In the discussions below, we refer to the year ended December 31, 20162019 as “2016”“2019” and the year ended December 31, 2015,2018 as “2015”“2018”. The percentage changes cited in our discussions below are the change between 20162019 and 2015.


The amounts presented for 2015 have been revised from previously reported amounts for the effects of the changes in accounting methods, reclassifications and revisions discussed above under Critical Accounting Policies and in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report.

Revenue.  We earn revenue primarily from the following activities:

License revenue from sales of our EFT platform products that we deliver as either perpetually-licensed software installed at the customer’s premises, for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered, or as a cloud-based service under our EFT Cloud Services brand delivered using a SaaS model, for which we earn monthly subscription revenue as these services are delivered.
License revenue from sales of our Mail Express, WAFS and CuteFTP products that are installed at the customer’s premises under a perpetual license for which we earn the full amount of the license revenue at the time the license is delivered.
M&S revenue under contracts to provide ongoing product support and software updates to our customers who have purchased license software which we recognize ratably over the contractual period, which is typically one year but can be up to three years.
2018.

Professional services revenue from a variety of implementation, and integration services, as well as delivery of education and training associated with our solutions, which we recognize as the services are performed and accepted by the client.
40



The components of our revenues were as follows ($ in thousands):


  Revenue for the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
     Percent of     Percent of 
  Amount  Total  Amount  Total 
             
Revenue By Type
            
License $11,984   35.9% $12,023   39.1%
M&S  18,668   56.0%  16,489   53.7%
Professional Services (all EFT Plat  2,684   8.1%  2,223   7.2%
Total Revenue $33,336   100.0% $30,735   100.0%
                 
Revenue by Product Line
                
License                
EFT Platform $10,978   91.6% $10,459   87.0%
Other  1,006   8.4%  1,564   13.0%
Total License Revenue  11,984   100.0%  12,023   100.0%
                 
M&S                
EFT Platform  17,432   93.4%  15,006   91.0%
Other  1,236   6.6%  1,483   9.0%
   18,668   100.0%  16,489   100.0%
                 
Professional Services (all EFT Platform)  2,684   100.0%  2,223   100.0%
                 
Total Revenue                
EFT Platform  31,094   93.3%  27,688   90.1%
Other  2,242   6.7%  3,047   9.9%
  $33,336   100.0% $30,735   100.0%

  

Revenue for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 
      

Percent of

      

Percent of

 
  

Amount

  

Total

  

Amount

  

Total

 
                 

Revenue By Type

                

License

 $11,243   27% $10,512   30%

M&S

  26,318   65%  21,587   63%

Professional Services (all EFT Platform)

  2,782   7%  2,317   7%

Total Revenue

 $40,343   100% $34,416   100%
                 

Revenue by Product Line

                

License

                

EFT Platform

 $11,036   98% $10,208   97%

Other

  207   2%  304   3%

Total License Revenue

  11,243   100%  10,512   100%
                 

M&S

                

EFT Platform

  25,548   97%  20,707   96%

Other

  770   3%  880   4%
   26,318   100%  21,587   100%
                 

Professional Services (all EFT Platform)

  2,782   100%  2,317   100%
                 

Total Revenue

                

EFT Platform

  39,366   98%  33,232   97%

Other

  977   2%  1,184   3%
  $40,343   100% $34,416   100%

Our total revenue increased 8%17%. This increase consisted of growth in total revenueRevenue from our EFT platform products and services of $3.4 million, or 12%, offset by a decline in revenueincreased 18%. Revenue from our other products of $805,000, or 26%. The increase in EFT Platform revenue and decrease in other product revenue was a result we expected in light of our announcement in mid-2016 that our future focus would be on our EFT platform products. At the same time, we announced that while we would continue selling our other products consistingconsist of Mail Express, WAFS, and CuteFTP, decreased to less than 3% of our total revenue, which is a trend that is in line with our de-emphasis of those products.

We continue to offer product support for Mail Express and TappIn,WAFS, which we would de-emphasize thosediscontinued as products in the future, not expend future significant product development and engineering resources to enhance those products, and not dedicate significant future sales and marketing activities to them. We intend to maintain our focus on our EFT platform for the foreseeable future such that we expect to see a continuing decline in revenue from our products other than those that are partsale as of the EFT platform.


January 1, 2019.

EFT Platform Products


License M&S and professional services revenue from our EFT platform products increased 5%, 16% and 21% respectively. These increases across these products and services were primarily due to continued enhancement in our product development and software engineering groups which allowed us to refine our process for identifying new product opportunities, to better focus our resources on products that would yield larger and more immediately revenue opportunities, and to optimize our project management and software engineering processes to reduce the time necessary to produce new or improved products. To improve our ability to successful sell existing EFT platform products8%. This increase was anticipated as well as new products produced by our software engineering team, we continued to make ongoing changesa result of a number of changing variables in sales and marketing personnel and activities including:

·Increasing sales staffing and capabilities as needed to address our markets.
·Aligning our sales group to enhance its industry and geographic focus.
·Implementing new sales and marketing campaigns.
·Evolving our lead generation programs to increase our sales staff’s exposure to potential purchasers.
·Enhancing our support of channel partners and engaging them to sell our products through training, orientation and marketing programs.

strategy starting in August 2018 which includes expansion within the current client base.


The 5% increase in license revenue from our EFT platform products was also due to:

·
The introduction of new products or new versions of products as described above under Business-Software Products and Services.
·Our focus on leveraging the changes to our sales and marketing activities described above toward new customers who may not have previously used our products. While sales to existing customers often consist primarily of new modules added to existing software licenses, new customers present the potential for higher license sales since they typically need to purchase a license for our core products in addition to licenses for additional modules.

The 16% increase in

M&S revenue from our EFT platform products was alsoincreased 23% primarily due to:


·

The addition of sales resources that are focused on (i) increasing the number of clients who renew M&S and (ii) increasing annual contract prices to better reflect the value provided by our support teams.

Ongoing license sales since a majority of license sales are accompanied by an M&S contract. The change in M&S revenue typically lags behind the related change in license revenue because license sales are recognized as revenue in full in the period the license is delivered while the related M&S revenue is recognized in future periods as those services are delivered.

·

Sustaining high renewal rates of M&S contracts by customersclients who initially purchased these services in earlier periods. We believe these renewals are the result fromof clients recognizing the value provided by our programs designed to provide high-qualityMaintenance and responsive M&S services to our customers.Support team.


The 21% increase in

Our professional services revenue increased 20% in 2019 as compared to 2018. This increase was primarily related to the increased license revenue from our EFT platform since the demand for our professional services is closely related to purchases of licenses for our EFT platform products. The remaining increase was due to an enhancedincrease in software license sales and an expansion of our library of service offerings as well as a focus on managing our queue of professional services projects to be delivered which resulted in a reduction in our backlog of professional services related to earlier EFT platform license sales.


When we sell our licensed products, we also typically create a recurring revenue stream from M&S since almost all purchasers of our licensed products also purchase an M&S contract. In general, and depending upon the level of M&S a customer purchases, this recurring revenue stream is 20% to 30% per year of the price of the underlying software license to which the M&S relates.

Our M&S contracts are typically for one year, with some customers buying two or three year contracts. The customer pays us the M&S fee for the entire term of the agreement at the time the contract begins. We recognize that amount as revenue ratably in future periods over the term of the contract.

We typically experience a high renewal rate for M&S services for our enterprise products so long as a customer continues using the licensed product they purchased from us. As a result, growing license revenue not only contributes to increasing revenue growth at the time the license is sold but also provides a foundation for future recurring revenue as the purchasers of our licensed products continually renew M&S agreements to support their ongoing product support needs. This pattern of activity can create a cumulative effect for M&S renewals as a result of the cumulative number of licensed software installations sold over multiple years that create M&S renewals in any single year predictably (and in line with our expectations) exceeding the number of new software licenses we sell in a single year. We expect this cumulative effect to continue to grow if we continue to increase enterprise software license revenue in future periods.

Even though we experienced growth in EFT platform license revenue, that revenue as a percent of our total EFT platform revenue was 35% in 2016 compared to 38% in 2015. This decrease was due to the continuing accumulation of our recurring M&S revenue stream from prior license sales, the reduction of our backlog of professional services, and lower than expected license sales during the first half of 2016 which caused us to change our strategy to focus the substantial part of our resources on our EFT platform products.

Other Products

In mid-2016, we announced that our future focus would be on our EFT platform products. At the same time, we announced that while we would continue selling our other products consisting of Mail Express, WAFS, CuteFTP, and TappIn, we would de-emphasize in the future these stand-alone products that are not part of our EFT platform. Accordingly, during the second half of 2016, we curtailed our product development and engineering resources for these products and significantly reduced our sales and marketing activities supporting them. As a result, our license and M&S revenue from those products collectively declined 26%. Our future focus will be on our EFT platform such that we expect to see a continuing decline in revenue from these other products although we do expect them to continue to produce a modest contribution margin that contributes to our future profitability.


complete solutions.

Cost of Revenues.


These expenses are associated with the production, delivery and support of our products and services. We believe it is most meaningful to view cost of revenues as a percent of the revenues to which those costs relate since many of those costs are variable relative to revenue.

Cost of license revenue consists primarily of:


·

Amortization of capitalized software development costs we incur when producing our software products. This amortization begins when a product is ready for general release to the public.public and generally is an expense that is not directly variable relative to revenue.

·

Royalties we pay to use software developed by others for certain features of our products.products that is generally an expense that is variable relative to revenue.

·

Fees we pay to third parties who provide services supporting our SaaS subscription solutions for our EFT platform that generally have components that are both variable and cloud-based subscription solutions.not variable relative to revenue.


Cost of M&S revenue and cost of professional services revenue consist primarily of salaries and related costs of our employees and third parties we use to deliver these services.


Cost of software license revenue for software licensesdecreased 10% and as a percent of software license revenue was 26%24% in 20162019 compared to 20%28% in 2015. This increase was2018. These decreases were primarily the result of our release of new software products and new versions of existing products during the second half of 2015 and the resulting commencement ofdue to a decrease in amortization of the capitalized software development costs for those products. This additional amortization expense occurred only during a portion of 2015 but was in place for all of 2016 thereby resulting in the total amortization expense for 2016 exceeding the total amortization expense for 2015.


costs.

Cost of revenue for M&S revenue as a percent of M&S revenue was substantially unchanged.9% in 2019 as compared to 10% in 2018. Cost of revenue for M&S in absolute dollars increased by 5%10%. The increase in absolute dollars was due primarily to an increase in M&S revenue. The cost of delivering M&S can vary slightly up or down from period-to-period, but we believe such changes are typically not indicative of long term trends or permanent changes in our cost of delivering M&S. Our gross margin on these services generally remains greater than 90% as a result of a consistent application of our customer support delivery protocols and practices


personnel related expenses.

Cost of revenue for professional services revenue as a percent of professional servicesthat revenue was 62%42% in 20162019 as compared to 63%50% in 2015. This steady percentage is expected2018. The cost in lightabsolute dollars was relatively flat. The variation in percent of revenue resulted from the varying scope and mix of the levelprofessional services we deliver that can change from period-to-period in response to the circumstances of effort required to deliver these services remaining comparable between years.


the client environments in which we are working.

Sales and Marketing.


We believe it most meaningful to view cost of sales and marketing as a percent of revenues since many of those costs, particularly sales commissions, are variable relative to revenue. These expenses were 35%21% of total revenue for 20162019 compared to 34%29% of total revenue for 2015, which is consistent with our expectation that these expenses as a percent of revenue would remain relatively constant.2018. In absolute dollars these expenses decreased 17%, due primarily to decreased marketing expenses related to a decrease in our spending for content syndication and reduced personnel expenses.

General and Administrative. These expenses increased 12%. These variations were17% primarily due to:to a special bonus paid to employees in December 2019, an increase in share based compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of options granted to our former Chief Executive Officer who passed away unexpectedly in March 2019 and the accelerated vesting of restricted stock granted to a former member of our Board of Directors. The vesting acceleration of the stock options was pursuant to the terms of the applicable option agreements and the vesting acceleration of the restricted stock grant was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

42


·Increasing the size of our sales, marketing and product strategy teams and increased compensation rates due to competitive demands in the marketplace.
·Increasing marketing activities related to competitive intelligence and channel development.
·An increase in revenue which resulted in a higher absolute dollar amount of sales commissions paid to employees although the commission rate as a percent of sales did not change materially

Legal and Professional. These expenses decreased 67% primarily due to decreases in professional fees and related expenses associated with the previously disclosed internal investigation, the restatement of certain of our financial statements and related litigation.

Severance. These expenses decreased $473,000 primarily due to fewer one-time severance payments and termination benefits paid in 2019.

Research and Development.  The overall profile of our research and development activities was as follows (in($ in thousands):


  Year ending December 31, 
  2016  2015 
R&D expenditures capitalized $1,538  $1,967 
R&D expenditures expensed  2,539   2,562 
Total R&D expenditures $4,077  $4,529 


While the scope and magnitude of our software development activities measured

  

Year Ending December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

R&D expense

 $1,355  $1,883 

Capitalized software development costs

  1,074   1,276 

Total resources expensed for R&D

 $2,430  $3,159 

Our total R&D expenditures decreased 23% in hours of effort has continued to grow between these periods, the cost of performing that work decreased 10% in 20162019 as compared to 20152018 primarily due to:


·Increased use of our employees as an internal resource to do this work in 2016 compared to 2015 when we relied more on the use of higher cost, third-party software developers.
·Enhancement of relationships with third-party developers we continued to use by replacing legacy arrangements carrying higher costs with more cost effective and efficient arrangements.
·Shortages of qualified software engineers and qualified technical personnel that caused some of our open positions that arise during the normal course of business to take longer to fill.

to fewer employed software engineers and technical personnel.

Total resources expended for R&D set forth above as total R&D expenditures serves to illustrate our total corporate efforts to improve our existing products and to develop new products regardless of whether or not our expenditures for those efforts were expensed or capitalized. Total resources expended for R&D is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for R&D expense and capitalized software development costs individually. While we believe the non-GAAP total resources expended for R&D amount provides useful supplemental information regarding our overall corporate product improvement and new product creation activities, there are limitations associated with the use of this non-GAAP measurement. Total resources expended for R&D is a non-GAAP measure not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies since there is no standard for preparing this non-GAAP measure. As a result, this non-GAAP measure of total resources expended for R&D has limitations and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, R&D expense and capitalized software development costcosts individually.


General and Administrative.

These expenses increased 13%. This increase was primarily due to:

·Costs associated with the resignation or our chief executive officer in 2016 for which there was not a comparable event in 2015. The severance arrangement related to this resignation in May 2016 provided for continued payment of his salary throughout 2016. It also included a modification of certain stock options held by him to accelerate their vesting and to extend the period during which they can be exercised which resulted in a one-time, non-recurring share-based compensation expense being recorded in 2016.

·
Increased legal expenses primarily resulting from costs to defend ourselves against a patent infringement claim which has been settled. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings for more information.

Other Income.


Income (Expense).Other income increased from $82,000(expense) consists primarily of interest expense related to $159,000 due to enhanced investmentour credit facility more fully described in Note 8 of our cash in higher yielding investments during 2016 as compared to 2015.

financial statements.

Income Taxes.


Our effective tax rate was 34%13% for 20162019 and 29%25% for 2015. These rates differed from a federal statutory tax2018.

In 2019 our effective rate of 34% primarily due to:


·The domestic production activities deduction taken on our federal income tax return that is not an expense for financial statement purposes.
·Research and development tax credits.

Offset by:

·Certain expenses in our financial statements, such as a portion of meals and entertainment expenses, that are not deductible on our federal income tax return.
·State income taxes included in income tax expense in our financial statements.

Our effective tax rate for 2015 was lower than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to a tax benefit realized upon the exercise of certain share based awards and the deduction for foreign derived intangible income offset by certain expenses in our consolidated financial statements that are not deductible for federal income tax purposes and state income tax included in income tax expense in our consolidated financial statements.

In 2018 our effective tax rate for 2016was higher than the federal statutory rate primarily due to certain expenses in our consolidated financial statements that are not deductible for federal income tax purposes and state income tax included in income tax expense in our consolidated financial statements offset by the research and development tax credit provided in our 2014 financial statements being less thanand the amount of that credit ultimately claimed on our 2014 federal income tax return. This resulted from additional factors affecting the credit becoming known to us at the time the 2014 federal tax return was prepared. We recorded the difference between those amounts in our 2015 financial statements.

deduction for foreign derived intangible income.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.


ItemItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


GlobalSCAPE, Inc.


Index to Consolidated Financial Statements


Years endingended December 31, 20162019 and 2015


2018

Contents


57

45

  

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

59

46

60

47

61

48

62

49

63

50





ReportReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the

Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Stockholders

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”)(the Company) as of December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the year then ended.  two years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 16, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.


audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not requiredmisstatement, whether due to have, nor were we engagederror or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to perform an auditassess the risks of its internal control overmaterial misstatement of the consolidated financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditstatements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includesrespond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion,

Emphasis of Matter

As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, referredthe Company is involved in litigation and regulatory matters. The Company intends to above, present fairly,vigorously defend against these matters. However, at this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome and/or the scope of any potential loss. Accordingly, no provision for any liability that may result has been made in allthe consolidated financial statements. Should the Company ultimately be found liable, the resulting outcome could have a material respects, theadverse effect on its consolidated financial position, of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2016, andliquidity or the results of their operations and their cash flows forits operations. Our opinion is not modified with respect to these matters.

/s/ WEAVER AND TIDWELL LLP

We have served as the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Company’s auditor since 2017.

Austin, Texas



/s/ RSM US LLP

San Antonio, Texas
March 27, 2017

16, 2020


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/  Padgett, Stratemann & Co., L.L.P.
San Antonio, Texas
March 3, 2016

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except share amounts)
  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Assets      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $8,895  $15,885 
Short term investments  2,754   3,254 
Accounts receivable, net  6,964   5,875 
Federal income tax receivable  169   545 
Prepaid expenses  521   511 
Total current assets  19,303   26,070 
         
Property and equipment, net  456   498 
Long term investments  12,779   - 
Capitalized software development costs  3,743   3,982 
Goodwill  12,712   12,712 
Deferred tax asset  942   940 
Other assets  245   60 
Total assets $50,180  $44,262 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $876  $839 
Accrued expenses  1,836   1,893 
Deferred revenue  13,655   12,460 
Total current liabilities  16,367   15,192 
         
Deferred revenue, non-current portion  3,790   3,808 
Other long term liabilities  147   134 
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000
    authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
  -   - 
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 40,000,000
authorized, 21,920,912 and 21,303,467 shares issued
 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
  22   21 
Additional paid-in capital  21,650   19,583 
Treasury stock, 403,581 shares, at cost, at
    December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015
  (1,452)  (1,452)
Retained earnings  9,656   6,976 
Total stockholders’ equity  29,876   25,128 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $50,180  $44,262 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands except share amounts)

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $4,702  $9,173 

Accounts receivable, net

  7,239   6,657 

Federal income tax receivable

  1,759   - 

Prepaid expenses and other

  1,366   1,521 

Total current assets

  15,066   17,351 
         

Capitalized software development costs, net

  2,650   3,133 

Goodwill

  12,712   12,712 

Deferred tax asset, net

  493   395 

Property and equipment, net

  274   399 

Right of use assets

  2,905   - 

Other assets

  459   502 

Total assets

 $34,559  $34,492 
         

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

        

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

 $746  $820 

Accrued expenses

  1,598   1,214 

Income tax payable

  -   148 

Deferred revenue

  15,683   13,301 

Long term debt, current portion

  4,575   - 

Total current liabilities

  22,602   15,483 
         

Deferred revenue, non-current portion

  2,572   2,936 

Lease liability

  2,900   - 

Long term debt, non-current portion

  42,745   - 

Other long term liabilities

  24   117 
         

Commitments and contingencies

        
         

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

        

Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000

    authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

  -   - 

Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 40,000,000

    authorized, 23,890,890 and 22,441,860 shares issued

    at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

  24   22 

Additional paid-in capital

  32,156   25,584 

Treasury stock, 5,379,500 and 5,310,942 shares, at cost, at

    December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

  (23,087)  (22,712)

Retained earnings (deficit)

  (45,377)  13,062 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

  (36,284)  15,956 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 $34,559  $34,492 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
       
Operating revenues:      
Software licenses $11,984  $12,023 
Maintenance and support  18,668   16,489 
Professional services  2,684   2,223 
Total revenues  33,336   30,735 
Costs of revenues        
Software licenses  3,110   2,428 
Maintenance and support  1,541   1,466 
Professional services  1,671   1,394 
Total costs of revenues  6,322   5,288 
Gross Profit  27,014   25,447 
Operating expenses        
Sales and marketing  11,682   10,406 
General and administrative  6,975   6,168 
Research and development  2,539   2,562 
Total operating expenses  21,196   19,136 
Income from operations  5,818   6,311 
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense      (4)
Interest income  159   82 
Total other income (expense)  159   78 
Income before income taxes  5,977   6,389 
Provision for income taxes  2,026   1,861 
Net income $3,951  $4,528 
Comprehensive income $3,951  $4,528 
         
Net income per common share - basic $0.19  $0.22 
         
Net income per common share - diluted $0.18  $0.21 
         
Weighted average shares outstanding:        
Basic  21,126   20,824 
         
Diluted  21,677   21,366 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  

For the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 
         

Operating revenues:

        

Software licenses

 $11,243  $10,512 

Maintenance and support

  26,318   21,587 

Professional services

  2,782   2,317 

Total revenues

  40,343   34,416 

Costs of revenues

        

Software licenses

  2,682   2,978 

Maintenance and support

  2,292   2,093 

Professional services

  1,156   1,165 

Total costs of revenues

  6,130   6,236 

Gross Profit

  34,213   28,180 

Operating expenses

        

Sales and marketing

  8,331   10,009 

General and administrative

  7,495   6,382 

Legal and Professional

  1,520   4,623 

Severance

  15   488 

Research and development

  1,355   1,883 

Total operating expenses

  18,716   23,385 

Income from operations

  15,497   4,795 

Other income (expense):

        

Interest expense

  (405)  - 

Interest income

  140   86 

Total other income (expense)

  (265)  86 

Income before income taxes

  15,232   4,881 

Provision for income taxes

  1,965   1,227 

Net income

 $13,267  $3,654 

Comprehensive income

 $13,267  $3,654 
         

Net income per common share - basic

 $0.76  $0.18 
         

Net income per common share - diluted

 $0.72  $0.17 
         

Weighted average shares outstanding:

        

Basic

  17,424   20,721 
         

Diluted

  18,525   21,017 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands, except number of shares)

        Additional          
  Common Stock  Paid-in  Treasury  Retained    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Stock  Earnings  Total 
                   
                   
Balance at December 31, 2014  20,909,267  $21  $18,370  $(1,452) $3,389   20,328 
                         
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options  314,200       508           508 
                         
Tax (deficiency) from stock-based compensation          58           58 
                         
Stock-based compensation expense                        
Stock options          400           400 
Restricted stock  80,000       247           247 
                         
Common stock cash dividends                  (941)  (941)
                         
Net income                  4,528   4,528 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2015  21,303,467  $21  $19,583  $(1,452) $6,976  $25,128 
                         
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options  537,445   1   1,118           1,119 
                         
Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock-based compensation          (24)          (24)
                         
Stock-based compensation expense                        
       Stock options          700           700 
       Restricted stock  80,000       273           273 
                         
Common stock cash dividends                  (1,271)  (1,271)
                         
Net income                  3,951   3,951 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2016  21,920,912  $22  $21,650  $(1,452) $9,656  $29,876 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

(in thousands, except number of shares)

          

Additional

      

Retained

     
  

Common Stock

  

Paid-in

  

Treasury

  

Earnings

     
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Capital

  

Stock

  

(Deficit)

  

Total

 
                         
                         

Balance at December 31, 2017

  22,196,712  $22  $23,793  $(1,452) $9,353  $31,716 
                         

Retained Earnings Adjustment due to 606

                  979   979 
                         

Purchase of Treasury Stock

              (21,260)      (21,260)
                         

Cancellation of Restricted Stock

  (40,000)                    
                         

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options

  205,148       522           522 
                         

Stock-based compensation expense

                        

       Stock options

          1,055           1,055 

       Restricted stock

  80,000       214           214 
                         

Common stock cash dividends, $0.045 per share

                  (924)  (924)
                         

Net income

                  3,654   3,654 
                         

Balance at December 31, 2018

  22,441,860  $22  $25,584  $(22,712) $13,062  $15,956 
                         

Purchase of Treasury Stock

              (375)      (375)
                         

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options

  1,329,030   2   4,602           4,604 
                         

Stock option cash settlement

          (445)          (445)
                         

Stock-based compensation expense

                        

       Stock options

          1,581           1,581 

       Restricted stock

  120,000       834           834 
                         

Common stock cash dividends, $3.895 per share

                  (71,706)  (71,706)
                         

Net income

                  13,267   13,267 
                         

Balance at December 31, 2019

  23,890,890  $24  $32,156  $(23,087) $(45,377) $(36,284)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Operating Activities:      
Net income $3,951  $4,528 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Bad debt expense  72   62 
Depreciation and amortization  2,045   1,553 
Stock-based compensation  973   647 
Deferred taxes  (2)  (248)
Excess tax deficiency from exercise of share based compensation  24   (58)
Subtotal before changes in operating assets and liabilities  7,063   6,484 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (1,161)  1 
Prepaid expenses  (10)  (23)
Federal income taxes  352   (233)
Accrued interest receivable  (163)  (69)
Other assets  (185)  40 
Accounts payable  37   (272)
Accrued expenses  (58)  303 
Deferred revenues  1,178   708 
Other long-term liabilities  13   82 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7,066   7,021 
Investing Activities:        
Software development costs  (1,538)  (1,967)
Purchase of property and equipment  (226)  (152)
Purchase of certificates of deposit  (12,116)  - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (13,880)  (2,119)
Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  1,119   508 
Tax deficiency (benefit) from stock-based compensation  (24)  58 
Dividends paid  (1,271)  (941)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (176)  (375)
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (6,990)  4,527 
Cash at beginning of period  15,885   11,358 
Cash at end of period $8,895  $15,885 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Cash paid during the period for:        
Interest $-  $- 
Income taxes $1,638  $2,146 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

  

For the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Operating Activities:

        

Net income

 $13,267  $3,654 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

     

Bad debt expense (recovery)

  63   (88)

Depreciation and amortization

  1,746   2,173 

Stock-based compensation

  2,415   1,269 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

  70   - 

Deferred taxes

  (98)  (4)

Subtotal before changes in operating assets and liabilities

  17,463   7,004 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  (645)  (644)

Prepaid expenses and other

  155   (216)

Federal income taxes

  (1,907)  970 

Operating lease right-of-use asset

  170   - 

Other assets

  43   191 

Accounts payable

  (74)  (1,080)

Accrued expenses

  384   (457)

Deferred revenues

  2,018   (813)

Operating lease liabilities

  (175)  - 

Other long-term liabilities

  (93)  (59)

Net cash provided by operating activities

  17,339   4,896 

Investing Activities:

        

Software development costs

  (1,074)  (1,276)

Purchase of property and equipment

  (64)  (162)

Redemption of certificates of deposit

  -   15,794 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  (1,138)  14,356 

Financing Activities:

        

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  4,604   522 

Stock option cash settlement

  (445)  - 

Credit facility funding

  49,646   - 

Payment of debt issuance costs

  (1,771)  - 

Notes payable principal payments

  (625)  - 

Purchase of treasury stock

  (375)  (21,260)

Dividends paid

  (71,706)  (924)

Net cash (used in) financing activities

  (20,672)  (21,662)

Net increase (decrease) in cash

  (4,471)  (2,410)

Cash at beginning of period

  9,173   11,583 

Cash at end of period

 $4,702  $9,173 
         

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid during the period for:

        

Interest

 $335  $- 

Income taxes

 $3,203  $253 
         

Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:

        

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations

  3,075   - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Notes Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 20162019 and 2015

2018

1.Nature of Business and Corporate Structure


We provide secure information exchange capabilities for enterprises and consumers through the development and distribution of software, delivery of managed and hosted solutions, and provisioning of associated services. Our solution portfolio facilitates transmission of critical information such as financial data, medical records, customerclient files, vendor files, personnel files, transaction activity, and other similar documents between diverse and geographically separated network infrastructures while supporting a range of information protection approaches to meet privacy and other security requirements. In addition to enabling secure, flexible transmission of critical information using servers, desktop and notebook computers, and a wide range of network-enabled mobile devices, our products also provide customersclients with the ability to monitor and audit file transfer activities. Our primary product is EnhanceEnhanced File Transfer, or EFT. We have other products that complement our EFT product.


Throughout these notes, unless otherwise noted, our references to 20162019 and 20152018 refer to the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


2.

2.     Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Presentation


We follow accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. This board sets generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, thatwhich we follow in preparing financial statements that report our financial position, results of operations, and sources and uses of cash. We also follow the reporting regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of our financial statements. It is possible the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of our financial position and results of operations.


Principles of Consolidation


The accompanying consolidated financial statements of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (collectively referred to as “GlobalSCAPE”, the “Company” or “we”) are prepared in conformity with GAAP. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.


Changes in Accounting Methods, Reclassifications

Revenue Recognition

Products and Revisions


As part of our ongoing enhancementServices

We earn revenue by delivering the following software products and refinement of our financial reporting to fairly present our results of operations and financial position, we may make changes from time-to-time in accounting methods and in the classification and presentation of our business activities in our financial statements. To ensure comparability between periods, we revise previous period financial statements presented to conform them to the method of presentation in our current period financial statements. If the changes increase or decrease previously reported amounts of revenue or expenses, we adjust retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presented for the cumulative effect, if any, on that balance.  If these changes affect our financial statements for previously reported interim periods not presented herein, we present revised financial statements for those periods when they are reported in the future.


services:

Perpetual software licenses under which clients install our products in their information systems environment on computers they manage, own or otherwise procure from a cloud services provider. Clients also deploy our products with cloud services providers in a BYOL environment.

Cloud-based, hosted SaaS solutions that we sell on an ongoing subscription basis resulting in our earning recurring, monthly subscription and usage fees to access the service.

Maintenance and support services, or M&S, that generally consist of telephone support and access to unspecified future software upgrades.

Professional services for product integration and configuration that generally do not significantly modify our software products.


Method of Amortization of Deferred Revenue Related to M&S Agreements

In previously issued financial statements, we amortized deferred revenue related to M&S agreements by recording a full month of amortization in the first month of an agreement. We used that method based on our intent to match revenue from our M&S agreements to the expense we incur when delivering M&S services. We acknowledge that the more common and widespread practice is to amortize deferred revenue based upon the specific number of days the M&S agreement is in place during that month. Both methods result in the recognition of the same amount of revenue over the term of the M&S agreement but yield differing amounts of revenue being recognized in the first month and last month of an M&S agreement.

We have changed our method of amortizing deferred revenue related to M&S agreements such that our consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets included herein are now prepared using the specific number of days method. This change had the effect of decreasing M&S revenue and net income on our statements of operations for 2016 and 2015 by immaterial amounts. It increased the amount of our deferred revenue on our balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, which will result in us reporting more revenue in periods subsequent to 2016 than we would have reported under the previous method. This change has no effect on the total amount of revenue we will realize from our M&S contracts.

Method of Recording M&S Billings

We may invoice a customer for M&S to be provided commencing on a date in a month subsequent to the month in which we invoice the customer. We typically receive a purchase order from our customers for M&S prior to invoicing them, and it is not uncommon for a customer to pay us in advance of that M&S commencement date either on their own or when we request such payment. Accordingly, we previously recorded an account receivable and deferred revenue for these invoices as of the date of the invoice. We believe a reasonable, alternate and more conservative method is to wait until the commencement date of the M&S has arrived to record the account receivable and deferred revenue for any such invoices for which we have not been paid as of the balance sheet date. Accordingly, our consolidated balance sheets included herein are now prepared using that method. This change has the effect of decreasing our reported amounts of accounts receivable and deferred revenue but does not affect any of our reported amounts of revenue or net income.

Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses

We employ sales engineers who assist our sales staff in addressing technical considerations by our customers prior to them purchasing our product. Our use of sales engineers has expanded in recent quarters. Prior to 2016, we classified the expense of sales engineers as part of costs of revenue – professional services. We believe these expenses are now more appropriately classified as part of sales and marketing expense and have now classified them as such. This change has the effect of decreasing cost of revenue – professional services and increasing sales and marketing expense. It does not affect any of our reported amounts of revenue or net income.

Reclassification of Reserve for Uncertain Tax Position

As described in Note 9, we maintain a reserve for uncertain tax positions. Previously, we classified that reserve as a current liability since it was not material to our financial statements taken as a whole. In assessing the materiality of this reserve as of December 31, 2016, we determined it appropriate to classify it as a component of other long term liabilities. This change has the effect of decreasing current income taxes payable and increasing other long term liabilities.

With respect to the above items, we have revised our financial statements as of December 31, 2015, and for the year then ended as follows:

Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 
     Revision Related To    
  
As Previously
Reported
  Change in Method of Deferred Revenue Amortization  Reclassification of Sales Engineer Expenses  
As
Revised
 
             
Operating revenues:            
Software licenses $12,023        $12,023 
Maintenance and support  16,595  $(106)     16,489 
Professional services  2,223          2,223 
Total revenues  30,841   (106)  -   30,735 
Costs of revenues                
Software licenses  2,428           2,428 
Maintenance and support  1,466           1,466 
Professional services  1,775       (381)  1,394 
Total costs of revenues  5,669       (381)  5,288 
Gross Profit  25,172   (106)  381   25,447 
Operating expenses                
Sales and marketing  10,025       381   10,406 
General and administrative  6,168           6,168 
Research and development  2,562           2,562 
Total operating expenses  18,755       381   19,136 
Income from operations  6,417   (106)  -   6,311 
Other income (expense):                
   Interest expense  (4)          (4)
   Interest income  82           82 
Total other income (expense)  78   -   -   78 
Income before income taxes  6,495   (106)  -   6,389 
Provision for income taxes  1,897   (36)  -   1,861 
Net income $4,598  $(70) $-  $4,528 
Comprehensive income $4,598  $(70) $-  $4,528 
                 
Net income per common share - basic $0.22  $-  $-  $0.22 
                 
Net income per common share - diluted $0.22  $(0.01) $-  $0.21 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
  As of December 31, 2015 
     Revision Related To    
  
As Previously
Reported
  
Change in Method
of Deferred
Revenue Amortization
  
Change in Method
of Recording
M&S Billings
  
Change in Classification of Reserve for Uncertain
Tax Position
  As Revised 
Assets               
Current assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $15,885           $15,885 
Short term investments  3,254            3,254 
Accounts receivable, net  6,081     $(206)     5,875 
Federal income tax receivable  290  $255          545 
Prepaid and other expenses  511              511 
Total current assets  26,021   255   (206)  -   26,070 
                     
Long term investments                    
Property and equipment, net  498               498 
Capitalized software development costs, net  3,982               3,982 
Goodwill  12,712               12,712 
Deferred tax asset, net  940               940 
Other assets  60               60 
Total assets $44,213  $255  $(206) $-  $44,262 
                     
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                    
Current liabilities:                    
Accounts payable  839               839 
Accrued expenses  1,893               1,893 
Deferred revenue  12,000   648   (188)      12,460 
Income taxes payable  127   (37)      (90)  - 
Total current liabilities  14,859   611   (188)  (90)  15,192 
                     
Deferred revenue, non-current portion  3,612   214   (18)      3,808 
Other long term liabilities  44           90   134 
                     
Stockholders' Equity:                    
Preferred stock  -               - 
Common stock  21               21 
Additional paid-in capital  19,583               19,583 
Treasury stock  (1,452)              (1,452)
Retained earnings  7,546   (570)          6,976 
Total stockholders’ equity  25,698   (570)          25,128 
                     
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $44,213  $255  $(206) $-  $44,262 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 
  
As Previously
Reported
  
Change in Method
of Deferred
Revenue Amortization
  
Change in Method
of Recording
M&S Billings
  
Change in Classification of Reserve for Uncertain
Tax Position
  
As
Adjusted
 
                
Operating Activities:               
Net income $4,598   (70)       $4,528 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                  
Bad debt expense  62             62 
Depreciation and amortization  1,553             1,553 
Stock-based compensation  647             647 
Deferred taxes  (248)            (248)
Excess tax deficiency from exercise of share based compensation  (58)            (58)
Subtotal before changes in operating assets and liabilities  6,554   (70)  -   -   6,484 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                    
Accounts receivable  (205)      206       1 
Prepaid expenses  (23)              (23)
Federal income taxes  (107)  (36)      (90)  (233)
Accrued interest receivable  (69)              (69)
Other assets  40               40 
Accounts payable  (272)              (272)
Accrued expenses  303               303 
Deferred revenues  808   106   (206)      708 
Other long-term liabilities  (8)          90   82 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7,021   -   -   -   7,021 
Investing Activities:                    
Software development costs  (1,967)              (1,967)
Purchase of property and equipment  (152)              (152)
Purchase of certificates of deposit  -               - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (2,119)  -   -   -   (2,119)
Financing Activities:                    
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  508               508 
Tax deficiency (benefit) from stock-based compensation  58               58 
Dividends paid  (941)              (941)
Net cash provided by (used in)  financing activities  (375)  -   -   -   (375)
Net increase (decrease) in cash  4,527               4,527 
Cash at beginning of period  11,358   -   -   -   11,358 
Cash at end of period $15,885  $-  $-  $-  $15,885 
                     
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:                    
Cash paid during the period for:                    
Interest $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Income taxes $2,146  $-  $-  $-  $2,146 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands)
  Retained Earnings  Total Equity 
  
As Previously
Reported
  
Change in Method
of Deferred
Revenue Amortization
  
As
Revised
  
As Previously
Reported
  
Change in Method
of Deferred
Revenue Amortization
  
As
Revised
 
                   
                   
Balance at December 31, 2014 $3,889  $(500) $3,389  $20,828  $(500) $20,328 
                         
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options              508       508 
                         
Tax (deficiency) from stock-based compensation              58       58 
                         
Stock-based compensation expense                        
Stock options              400       400 
Restricted stock              247       247 
                         
Common stock cash dividends  (941)      (941)  (941)      (941)
                         
Net income  4,598   (70)  4,528   4,598   (70)  4,528 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2015 $7,546  $(570) $6,976  $25,698  $(570) $25,128 


Revenue Recognition

We develop, market and sell software products. We recognize revenue from a sale transaction when the following conditions are met:

·Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.
·Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered.
·The amount of the sale is fixed or determinable.
·Collection of the sale amount is reasonably assured.

For a sale transaction not meeting any one of these four criteria, we defer recognition of revenue related to that transaction until all the criteria are met.

We earn the majority of our software license revenue from the sale of perpetual software licenses and associated contracts for M&S.

We recognize revenue when we have satisfied a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or delivering a service to a client. We measure revenue based upon the consideration set forth in an arrangement or contract with a client. The revenue recognition criteria we apply to each of our software products soldand services are as follows:

Perpetual software licenses – These licenses grant a right to use our functional intellectual property. We recognize revenue at the point in time when we electronically deliver to our client the software license key that provides the ability to access and use our product. If our client is a reseller who will further transfer the ability to access and use our product to a third party under a separate arrangement that the reseller has with that third party, we recognize revenue at the time we deliver the software license key to the reseller since our contract is with the reseller.

Cloud-based, hosted SaaS solutions – These solutions grant a right to access our functional intellectual property. We recognize revenue over time on a monthly basis as we deliver the services to which our clients subscribe. Revenue can include basic monthly fees to access the software and usage fees based upon the volume of certain resources the client consumes (such as volumes of storage or bandwidth). We are generally paid for these services on a month-to-month basis, but if a client pays us in advance for services we will deliver in the future, we record as deferred revenue the amount of such payment related to services we have not yet delivered.

M&S – We provide these services to purchasers of perpetual software licenses under perpetual software license agreements. At the time our customers purchase these products, they typically also purchase a product maintenance and support, or M&S, agreement. These transactions are multiple element software sales for which we assess the presence of vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value of the undelivered elements to determine the portion of these sales to recognize as revenue upon delivery of the software product and the portion of these sales to record as deferred revenue at the time the product is delivered. We amortize the deferred revenue component to revenue in future periods as we deliver the related future services to the customer. For transactions, if any, for which we cannot establish VSOE of the fair value of the undelivered elements, we initially record the entire transaction as deferred revenue and amortize that amount to revenue in future periods as we deliver the related future services to the customer.

We provide services under M&S agreements with terms generally ranging from one to three years. We require up-front payment of our M&S fee in an amount that covers the entire term of the agreement.  We record as deferred revenue amounts due or paid that relate to future periods during which we will provide the M&S service. We reduce deferred revenue and recognize revenue ratably in future periods as we deliver the M&S service.

Professional services – We recognize revenue from these services when the services are completed. If we are paid in advance for these services, we record such payment as deferred revenue until we complete the services.

The delivery of our software products and services generally does not involve any variable consideration, financing components or consideration payable to a client such as rebates or other incentives that reduce amounts owed to us by clients.

Deferred Revenue Classification and Activity

Deferred revenue related to services we will deliver within one year is presented as a current liability while deferredliability. Deferred revenue related to services that we will deliver more than one year into the future is presented as a non-current liability. We reduce

The activity in our deferred revenue and recognize revenue ratably balances has been as follows ($in future periods as we deliverthousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Deferred revenue, beginning of period

 $16,237  $17,050 

Deferred revenue resulting from new contracts with clients

  31,117   21,577 

Deferred revenue at the beginning of the period that was amortized to revenue

  (24,945)  (20,244)

Deferred revenue arising during the period that was amortized to revenue

  (4,154)  (2,146)

Deferred revenue, end of period

 $18,255  $16,237 

Multi-Element Transactions

At the time clients purchase perpetual software licenses, they also typically purchase M&S service.

although it is not mandatory. We do not sell separate M&S to subscribers to our SaaS solutions as M&S is provided as part of their SaaS subscription. Clients may also purchase professional services at the time they purchase perpetual software licenses or a SaaS subscription. Each of the components of these multi-element transactions is a separately identifiable performance obligation.

For our products licensed and delivered under a software-as-a-servicemulti-element transactions, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation on a monthly or other periodic subscription basis, we recognize subscription revenue, including initial setup fees, on a monthly basis ratably overrelative stand-alone selling price basis. We determine that stand-alone selling price for each item at the contractual terminception of the customer contracttransaction involving these multiple elements.

We sell, as we deliver our products and services. Amounts paid prior to this revenue recognition are presented as deferred revenue until earned.

We providestand-alone transactions, renewals of pre-existing M&S contracts, professional services to clients seeking assistance with products they have previously purchased from us, or SaaS subscriptions to clients not requiring any of our customers consisting primarilyother products or services. Accordingly, we are able to estimate the stand-alone selling price of these items based upon our observation of those transactions. Since most of our sales of perpetual software installation support, operations supportlicenses are part of multi-element transactions that also involve M&S and/or professional services, and training. because the selling price of those licenses can vary significantly among clients, we use the residual approach under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Top 606, or ASC 606, to estimate the selling price of perpetual software licenses in a multi-element transaction by reference to the total transaction price less the sum of the observable stand-alone selling prices of M&S and/or professional services.

We recognize revenue from these services as they are completed and accepted by our customers.

allocate discounts proportionally to all of the components of a multi-element transaction.

Sales Tax

We collect sales tax on many of our sales.transactions with clients as required under applicable law. We do not include sales tax collected in our revenue. We record it as a liability payable to taxing authorities.

Allowance for Sales Returns

We provide an allowance for sales returns. We estimate this allowance based upon our historical experience and the nature of recent transactions with clients. This amount is included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.

Contract Assets

We generally bill clients for professional services when we have fully delivered the services specified in the contract. We may incur costs in delivering the services prior to that time. Such costs are generally not material. Accordingly, we do not record a contract asset for professional service engagements in process but not yet billed.

Incremental Costs of Obtaining a Contract to Deliver Goods and Services

We incur incremental costs in the form of sales commissions paid to our sales personnel and royalties on certain products paid to third parties. These are costs we would not incur if we did not obtain a contract to deliver our goods and services. We account for these costs as follows:

If the costs are associated with products and services for which we recognize revenue at a fixed point in time (primarily sales of perpetual software licenses and professional services), we expense these costs in full at the time we recognize that revenue.

If the costs are associated with services for which we recognize revenue over time (primarily sales of M&S and SaaS subscriptions) for which we believe it is likely that the contract for those services will be renewed for additional terms in the future, provided we deem these costs to be recoverable, we record these costs as a deferred expense asset and amortize that cost to expense as follows:

o

For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us primarily only over the term of the specific underlying contract currently in force (such as the term of an M&S contract), we recognize expense ratably each month over that term.

o

For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us over an overall client relationship that is likely to span a period of time that is longer than an initial contract term (for example, an M&S contract renewed for multiple terms in the future), we recognize expense ratably monthly over the estimated life of the client relationship.

Our activity in deferred costs of obtaining a contract to deliver goods and services has been as follows ($in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Deferred cost, beginning of period

 $1,009  $1,240 

Deferred cost resulting from new contracts with clients

  812   674 

Deferred cost amortized to expense

  (878)  (905)

Deferred cost, end of period

 $943  $1,009 

52

We recorded $577,000 and $571,000 in prepaid and other current assets and $366,000 and $438,000 was recorded in noncurrent other assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Leases

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, other current liabilities, and operating lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately. On April 18, 2019, the Company signed a new operating lease for our existing office space location. The lease is for a period of 10 years at an average annual rent of $462,000 beginning May 1, 2019. We recorded a right-of-use asset and lease liability of approximately $3 million at the commencement of the lease.

Cash and cash equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents includesinclude all cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.


Short Term Investments

Short-term investments consist

Fair Value of certificatesFinancial Instruments

For financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis, fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset, or pay to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction with a market participant at the measurement date. In the absence of deposit heldsuch data, fair value is estimated using internal information consistent with financial institutions with contractual maturity dates less than one yearwhat market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction. In determining fair value, observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions; preference is given to observable inputs. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3: Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.

As of December 31, 2019, we did not have any assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis that would require disclosure based on the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques. In addition, certain non-financial assets and liabilities are to be initially measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. This includes items such as non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination (but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods) and non-financial, long-lived assets measured at fair value for an impairment assessment. In general, non-financial assets and liabilities including goodwill, capitalized software and property and equipment are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs, which result in management’s best estimate of fair value from the balance sheet date.  perspective of a market participant, when there is an indication of impairment and are recorded at fair value only when impairment is recognized.

Our financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable.

The Company has the intentcarrying amount of cash and ability to hold these investments until their maturity datescash equivalents, accounts receivable, and therefore accounts for them as held-to-maturity. These certificates of deposit are stated at amortized cost, whichpayable, approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these investments.


Long-Term Investments

Long-term investments consistinstruments, all of certificateswhich mature within 12 months.

The carrying amount of deposit held with financial institutions with contractual maturity dates greater than one year fromour notes payable, including the balance sheet date. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates and therefore accounts for themcurrent portion, as held-to-maturity. These certificates of deposit are stated at amortized cost, whichDecember 31, 2019 was $49,375,000. This carrying value approximates fair value based on interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of these investments.

debt with similar terms and maturities.

Property and Equipment


Property and equipment is comprised of furniture and fixtures, software, computer equipment and leasehold improvements which are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment have a useful life of five to seven years, computer equipment and software have a useful life of three years and leasehold improvements have a useful life that is the shorter of the term of the lease under which the improvements were made or the estimated useful life of the asset.


Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operationsexpensed as incurred.


Goodwill


Goodwill is not amortized. On at least an annual basis, we test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level using December 31 as the measurement date. We operate as a single reporting unit.

When testing goodwill, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing this qualitative assessment, we assess events and circumstances relevant to us including, but not limited to:


Macroeconomic conditions.
Industry and market considerations.
Cost factors and trends for labor and other expenses of operating our business.
Our overall financial performance and outlook for the future.
Trends in the quoted market value and trading of our common stock.

Macroeconomic conditions.

Industry and market considerations.

Cost factors and trends for labor and other expenses of operating our business.

Our overall financial performance and outlook for the future.

Trends in the quoted market value and trading of our common stock.

In considering these and other factors, we consider the extent to which any adverse events and circumstances identified could affect the comparison of our reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. We place more weight on events and circumstances that most affect our reporting unit’s fair value or the carrying amount of our net assets. We consider positive and mitigating events and circumstances that may affect our determination of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. We evaluate, on the basis of the weight of the evidence, the significance of all identified events and circumstances in the context of determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.

If, after assessing the totality of these qualitative events and circumstances, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we conclude there is no impairment of goodwill and perform no further testing in accordance with GAAP. If we conclude otherwise, we proceed with performing the first step, and if necessary, the second step, of the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by GAAP.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, after assessing the totality of the relevant events and circumstances, we determined it not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. Accordingly, we concluded there was no impairment of goodwill as of that date. There have been no material events or changes in circumstances since that time indicating that the carrying amount of goodwill may exceed its fair market value and that interim testing needed to be performed.


Capitalized Software Development Costs

When we complete research and development for a software product and have in place a program plan and a detaileddetail program design or a working model of that software product, we capitalize production costs incurred for that software product from that point forward until it is ready for general release to the public. Thereafter, we amortize capitalized software production costs to expense using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of that product, which is generally three years. We periodically assess the carrying value of capitalized software development costs and our method of amortizing them relative to our estimates of realizability through sales of products in the marketplace.


Cost of revenue


Cost of revenue consists of expenses associated with the production, delivery and support of the products and services we sell. Cost of license revenue consists primarily of amortization of the capitalized software development costs we incur when producing our software products, royalties we pay to use software developed by others for certain features of our products, and fees we pay to third parties who provide services supporting our SaaS and cloud-based subscription solutions. Cost of M&S revenue and cost of professional services revenue consist primarily of salaries and related costs of our employees and third parties we use to deliver these services.

54

Research and Development

We expense research and development costs as incurred.


Advertising Expense


We expense advertising costs as incurred as a component of our sales and marketing expenses. Advertising expense was $1.9 millionapproximately $163,000 and $1.6 million$807,000 in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


Share-Based Compensation


We measure the cost of share-based payment transactions at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award. We recognize this cost as an expense ratably over the recipient’s requisite service period during which that award vests or becomes unrestricted.


For stock option awards, we estimate their fair value at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model considering the following factors:


We estimate expected volatility based on historical volatility of our common stock.
We use primarily the simplified method to derive an expected term which represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. We use this method because our options are plain-vanilla options, and we believe our historical option exercise experience is not adequately indicative of our future expectations.
We base the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
We estimate a dividend yield based on our historical and expected future dividend payments.

We estimate expected volatility based on historical volatility of our common stock.

We use primarily the simplified method to derive an expected term which represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. We use this method because our options are plain-vanilla options, and we believe our historical option exercise experience is not adequately indicative of our future expectations.

We base the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

We estimate a dividend yield based on our historical and expected future dividend payments.

For restricted stock awards, we use the quoted price of our common stock on the grant date as the fair value of the award.


Income Taxes


We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. We record deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount for financial reporting purposes, as measured by the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are carried on the balance sheet with the presumption that they will be realizable in future periods in which we generate taxable income.


We assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. Based on this assessment, we provide any necessary valuation allowance on our consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding increase in the tax provision on our statement of operations. Any valuation allowances we establish are determined based upon a number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various domestic jurisdictions in which we operate.


We account for uncertainty in income taxes using a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, we evaluate the tax position to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, we assess the tax position to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit we recognize is the largest amount that we believe has a greater than 50%50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits represent tax positions for which reserves have been established.


new tax legislation in the period in which it is signed into law.

Earnings Per Share


We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. We compute diluted earnings per share using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.

55

Awards of non-vested restricted stock and options are considered potentially dilutive common shares for the purpose of computing earnings per common share. We apply the treasury stock method to non-vested options under which the assumed proceeds include the amount the employee must pay to exercise the option plus the amount of unrecognized cost attributable to future periods less any expected tax benefits.


Recent accounting pronouncements

The Financial

Changes in Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, has issued the following Accounting Standard Updates (ASU) that we believe may be relevant toMethods, Reclassifications and Revisions

As part of our businessongoing enhancement and to the preparationrefinement of our financial statements:


reporting to fairly present our results of operations and financial position, we may make changes from time-to-time in accounting methods and in the classification and presentation of our business activities in our consolidated financial statements. To ensure comparability between periods, we revise previous period consolidated financial statements presented to conform them to the method of presentation in our current period consolidated financial statements. If the changes increase or decrease previously reported amounts of revenue or expenses, we adjust retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presented for the cumulative effect, if any, on that balance. If these changes affect our financial statements for previously reported interim periods not presented herein, we present revised consolidated financial statements for those periods when they are reported in the future.

Recent accounting pronouncements

ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (issued January 2017) - To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, Step 2 was eliminated from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. Any loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductibletax-deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. This update also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. An entity is required to disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. A public business entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)an SEC filer is required to adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We expect that the application of the provisions of this update will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.


ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (issued June 2016) - Among the provisions of this ASU is a requirement that assets measured at amortized cost, which includes trade accounts receivable, be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This pronouncement requires that an entity reflect all of its expected credit losses based on current estimates which will replace the current standard requiring that an entity need consider only past events and current conditions in measuring an incurred loss. We are subject to this guidance effective with consolidated financial statements we issue for the year ending December 31, 2020,2023, and the quarterly periods during that year. We do not expect the amounts we report as accounts receivable in those future periods under this guidance to be materially affected relative to current guidance.


ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (issued March 2016) - When implemented, this standard will discontinue2016-02, Leases (Topic 842):In February 2016, the recording in equity of tax benefits or tax deficiencies that arise from differences between share-based payment compensation expense recorded for financial statement purposes and that expense deductible for tax purposes. ThisFASB issued a new standard requires thatrelated to leases to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the tax effectrecognition of all such differences be recordedROU assets and reportedlease liabilities on the balance sheet. Most prominent among the changes in the statementstandard is the recognition of operations. This standard also requires that tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments be reportedROU assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating activities inleases. Under the statementstandard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows which is a changearising from leases. We are also required to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the current requirement to present such tax-related items as an inflow from financing activities and an outflow from operating activities. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annual financial statements for 2017. The extent of the effectearliest comparative period presented using a modified retrospective approach, with certain practical expedients available. We adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective approach effective January 1, 2019. As leases in place at the time of this standardadoption were not material, no right-of-use assets or lease liabilities were recorded upon adoption. We elected the available practical expedients and implemented internal controls and key system functionality to enable the preparation of financial information on adoption. On April 18, 2019, the Company signed a new operating lease for our financial statementsexisting office space location. The lease is for 2017a period of 10 years at an average annual rent of $462,000 beginning May 1, 2019. We recorded a right-of-use asset and later depends uponlease liability of approximately $3 million at the levelcommencement of stock option exercise activity we experience in 2017 and later. The amounts involved in accounting for tax benefits or deficiencies from share-based compensation that are the subject of ASU 2016-09 are presented in our 2016 and earlier consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity on lines that are captioned tax benefit or tax deficiency from share-based compensation.

lease.


ASU 2016-02, Leases (issued February 2016). The main difference between existing GAAP and this ASU 2016-02 is the presentation by lessees on their financial statements of lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases. Since this new standard retains the distinction between finance and operating leases, the effect of leases in the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows will be largely unchanged from existing GAAP. Our only lease of significance is our operating lease for our corporate office space for which we will present a right-to-use asset and a lease liability on our balance sheet when we implement this standard. We are in the process of determining those amounts. In accordance with this standard, we will implement it beginning with our interim and annual financial statements for 2019. The extent of the effect of this standard on our financial statements for 2019 and later will depend upon the leases, if any, that we have in effect at that date.

ASU 2015-17, Income Tax: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (issued November 2015) – This pronouncement requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities for a tax jurisdiction, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. We have implemented this ASU in the accompanying financial statements in the manner described in the Note 9 below.

ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (issued May 2014) - The core principle of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We have implemented these new principles using the modified retrospective transition method and recorded an increase (tax effected) to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 of $979,000. We also recorded as an asset deferred expense of approximately $1.2 million. We are subjectaccounting for these costs we incur to this guidance effective with financial statements we issue for the year ending December 31, 2018, and the quarterly periods during that year. We do not expect the application of this ASU to haveobtain a material effect on the amounts or timing of revenue we report in those future periods relative to current guidance.


We believe the application of ASU 2014-09 will result in a change in the manner in which we record sales commission expense related to M&S contracts. Currently, we record the full amount of the sales commission paid on the full value of an M&S contract as an expense on the inception date of the M&S contract. We believe that under ASU 2014-09, we will record that commission expense ratably over the term of the M&S contract. We have not yet quantified the effect of this change, but we do not expect that effect to be material to our results of operations or financial position.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. It is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s financial position and results of operation.

follows:

If these costs are associated with products and services for which we recognize revenue at a point in time (primarily sales of perpetual software licenses and professional services), we expense these costs in full at the time we recognize that revenue.

If these costs are associated with services for which we recognize revenue over time (primarily sales of M&S and SaaS subscriptions) for which we believe it is likely that the contract for those services will be renewed for additional terms in the future, provided we deem these costs to be recoverable, we record these costs as deferred expense asset and amortize that cost to expense as follows:

o

For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us primarily only over the term of the specific underlying contract currently in force (such as the term of an M&S contract), we will recognize expense ratably each month over that term.

o

For the portion of the cost that we determine benefits us over an overall customer relationship that is likely to span a period of time that is longer than an initial contract term (for example, an M&S contract renewed for multiple terms in the future), we will recognize expense ratably monthly over the estimated life of the customer relationship.

3.     Accounts Receivable,


Net

We bill our customersclients and issue them an invoice when we have delivered our goods or services to them. In addition, when our customersclients agree to purchase or renew M&S services, we bill and invoice our customersclients at that time, which could be before the date we begin delivering those services. In that event, we exclude from accounts receivable (and from the related deferred revenue, see Note 7)6) the invoices we have issued for which the M&S services commencement date is in the future and which have not been paid by the customerclient as of the date of our financial statements. Accordingly,We continually assess the collectability of our accounts receivable. If we deem it less than probable that we will collect an amount due us, we write-off that balance against our allowance for doubtful accounts.

We determine our accounts receivable, net, as follows ($ in thousands):


  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Total invoices issued and unpaid $7,680  $6,406 
Less: Unpaid invoices relating to M&S contracts with a start date subsequent to the balance sheet date  (381)  (206)
Gross accounts receivable  7,299   6,200 
Allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts  (335)  (325)
Accounts receivable, net $6,964  $5,875 


  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Total invoices issued and unpaid

 $8,245  $7,990 

Less: Unpaid invoices relating to M&S contracts with a start date subsequent to the balance sheet date

  (906)  (1,233)

Gross accounts receivable

  7,339   6,757 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  (100)  (100)

Accounts receivable, net

 $7,239  $6,657 

The activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns has been as follows ($ in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $100  $278 

ASC 606 Adjustment

  -   (100)

Provision for doubtful accounts

  63   (88)

Accounts written off

  (63)  10 

Balance, end of period

 $100  $100 

57


  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Balance, beginning of period $325  $511 
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns  250   55 
Accounts written off  (240)  (241)
Balance, end of period $335  $325 

4.     Property and Equipment,


Net

Property and equipment, at cost, and the related accumulated depreciation consist of the following ($ in thousands):


  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Furniture and fixtures $636  $620 
Software  651   638 
Equipment  1,411   1,218 
Leasehold improvements  559   559 
   3,257   3,035 
Less accumulated depreciation  (2,801)  (2,537)
Property and equipment, net $456  $498 

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Furniture and fixtures

 $828  $835 

Software

  669   669 

Equipment

  1,621   1,558 

Leasehold improvements

  559   559 
   3,677   3,621 

Less accumulated depreciation

  (3,403)  (3,222)

Property and equipment, net

 $274  $399 

5.     Capitalized Software Development Costs,


Net

Our capitalized software development costs balances and activity iswere as follows:follows ($ in thousands):

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Gross capitalized cost $7,252  $5,714 
Accumulated amortization  (3,509)  (1,732)
Net balance $3,743  $3,982 
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Amount capitalized $1,538  $1,967 
Amortization expense $(1,777) $(1,283)
  Released  Unreleased 
  Products  Products 
       
Gross capitalized amount at December 31, 2016 $6,171  $1,081 
Future amortization expense for
the year ending December 31,
        
2017 $1,589     
2018  856     
2019  217     
Total $2,662     


  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Gross capitalized cost

 $11,529  $10,454 

Accumulated amortization

  (8,879)  (7,321)

Net balance

 $2,650  $3,133 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Amount capitalized

 $1,074  $1,276 

Amortization expense

 $(1,557) $(1,929)

  

Released

  

Unreleased

 
  

Products

  

Products

 
         

Gross capitalized at December 31, 2019

 $10,255  $1,274 

Accumulated amortization

  (8,879)  - 

Net balance

 $1,376  $1,274 

Future amortization expense for

the year ending December 31,

        

2020

 $1,064     

2021

  301     

2022

  11     

Total

 $1,376     

The future amortization expense of the gross capitalized software development costs related to unreleased products will be determinable at a future date when those products are ready for general release to the public.

58

6.      Deferred Revenue


As described in Note 3 regarding accounts receivable, when our customersclients agree to purchase or renew M&S services, we bill and invoice our customersclients at that time which could be before the date we begin delivering those services. In that event, we exclude from deferred revenue (and from the related accounts receivable) the invoices we have issued for which the M&S services commencement date is in the future and which have not been paid by the customerclient as of the date of our consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, we determine our deferred revenue as follows ($ in thousands):

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Total invoiced for M&S contracts for which revenue will be recognized in future periods $17,826  $16,474 
Less: Unpaid invoices relating to M&S agreements with a start date subsequent to the balance sheet date  (381)  (206)
Total deferred revenue $17,445  $16,268 
         
Deferred revenue, current portion $13,655  $12,460 
Deferred revenue, non-current portion  3,790   3,808 
Total deferred revenue $17,445  $16,268 

  

December 31

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Total invoiced for M&S contracts for which revenue will be recognized in future periods

 $19,161  $17,470 

Less: Unpaid invoices at December 31 relating to M&S agreements with a start date subsequent to the balance sheet date

  (906)  (1,233)

Total deferred revenue at December 31

 $18,255  $16,237 
         

Deferred revenue, current portion

 $15,683  $13,301 

Deferred revenue, non-current portion

  2,572   2,936 

Total deferred revenue

 $18,255  $16,237 

7.      Commitments and Contingencies


Leases

We have an operating lease related to our office space. Minimum rental commitments under operating leases at December 31, 2016,2019 are as follows ($ in thousands):

Year Ending December 31, 
2017 $360 
2018  360 
2019  120 
Total $840 

Year Ending December 31,

 

2020

 $420 

2021

  431 

2022

  442 

2023

  453 

2024

  464 

Thereafter

  2,133 

Total

 $4,343 

Rent expense under operating leases was $386,000 and $347,000 in both 20162019 and 2015. We had a deferred rent liability2018, respectively.

Supplemental other information related to leases as of $31,000 atand for the year ended December 31, 2016, which we amortize to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life2019:

Operating lease cost

 $386 

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)

  9.3 

Weighted-average discount rate (%)

  5%

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

    

Operating cash flows from operating leases

 $395 

��

59

Severance Payments

We have agreements with key personnel that provide for severance payments to them in the event of a change“change in controlcontrol” of the Company, as defined in those agreements, and their employment is terminated in connection with that change in control. In such event, our aggregate severance payments to those employees would be $1.9 million.between approximately $700,000 and $1.5 million depending upon the circumstances.

Legal and Regulatory Matters

On October 12, 2018 and November 30, 2018, the Company received letters (the “Litigation Demand Letters”) from two stockholders demanding that the Company take action to remedy alleged harm caused to the Company, including to remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current and/or former directors and executive officers of the Company. The stockholders alleged, inter alia, that certain current and former directors and executive officers violated their fiduciary duties beginning at least in July 2016 by engaging in an illegal scheme to misrepresent the Company’s performance by falsely reporting accounts receivable, license revenue, total current assets and total assets, total stockholders’ equity, and total liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2016, causing the Company to suffer damages by overstating financial results for the fourth quarter of 2016.

The allegations referenced in the Litigation Demand Letters are related to the claims asserted in the securities class action Anthony Giovagnoli v. GlobalSCAPE, Inc., et. al., Case No. 5:17-cy-00753, previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2017 (the “Prior Litigation”).

On November 7, 2018, a special litigation committee (“Special Litigation Committee”) consisting of Dr. Thomas Hicks and Frank Morgan, was formed by the Board to analyze and investigate claims asserted in the October 12, 2018, Litigation Demand Letter and, subsequently, the November 30, 2018 Litigation Demand Letter, and consider claims that could potentially be asserted in stockholder derivative litigation related to facts connected to the claims and allegations in the Prior Litigation and the Litigation Demand Letters (the “Potential Derivative Litigation”). The Board charged the Special Litigation Committee with, among other things, determining what actions are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company, and determining whether it is in the best interests of the Company to pursue, dismiss, or consensually resolve any claims that may be asserted in the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Board determined that each member of the Special Litigation Committee is disinterested and independent with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation. Among other things, the Special Litigation Committee had the power to retain counsel and advisors, as appropriate, to assist it in the investigation, to gather and review relevant documents relating to the claims, to interview persons who may have knowledge of the relevant information, to prepare a report setting forth its conclusions and recommended course of action with respect to the Potential Derivative Litigation, and to take any actions, including, without limitation, directing the filing and prosecution of litigation on behalf of the Company, as the Special Litigation Committee in its sole discretion deems to be in the best interests of the Company in connection with the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Board resolved that the Special Litigation Committee’s findings and determinations shall be final and not subject to review by the Board and in all respects shall be binding upon the Company.

Between November 2018 and March 2019, the Special Litigation Committee, with the assistance of outside legal counsel to the Special Litigation Committee, conducted an investigation of the Potential Derivative Litigation.

On March 28, 2019, the Special Litigation Committee reported that it had completed its investigation and delivered its recommendation to the Board that the Company should not pursue the Potential Derivative Litigation because, among other things, it would not be in the best interest of the Company to do so.

On April 18, 2019, outside counsel for the Special Litigation Committee informed the two stockholders that sent the Litigation Demand Letters of the Special Litigation Committee’s recommendation and informed the stockholders that the Company would not pursue the Potential Derivative Litigation. The Company is not aware of any subsequent litigation commenced by these two stockholders or any other stockholders concerning claims related to the Potential Derivative Litigation.

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2018, the Fort Worth, Texas Regional Office of the SEC has opened a formal investigation of issues relating to the Restatement, with which the Company is cooperating fully.  At this time, the Company is unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs associated with the SEC’s investigation.  The Company is also unable to predict what, if any, action may be taken by the SEC, or what penalties or remedial actions the SEC may seek.  Any determination by the SEC that the Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

60

On May 31, 2018, the Company was served with a subpoena issued by a grand jury sitting in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (the “Grand Jury Subpoena”). The Grand Jury Subpoena requests all documents and emails relating to the Company’s investigation of the potential improper recognition of software license revenue. The Company intends to fully cooperate with the Grand Jury Subpoena and related investigation being conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas (the “U.S. Attorney’s Investigation”). At this time, the Company is unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs of the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation. The Company is also unable to predict what, if any, further action may be taken in connection with the Grand Jury Subpoena and the U.S. Attorney’s Investigation, or what, if any, penalties, sanctions or remedial actions may be sought. Any determination by the U.S. Attorney’s office that the Company’s activities were not in compliance with existing laws or regulations, however, could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

8.     Notes Payable

In November 2019, we entered into a credit facility with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A, as Administrative Agent and East West Bank as Syndication Agent consisting of a $50.0 million term loan and a $5 million revolving agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), which is secured by substantially all of our assets. Funds from the term loan were substantially used to fund a special dividend of $3.35 to our common shareholders which was paid on December 5, 2019. The revolving loan may be accessed to fund working capital needs. The loans bear a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus a Term Loan Spread between 3.75% and 2.25%. The amount of the Term Loan Spread is a function of the Company’s Leverage Ratio. Effective January 3, 2020, the Company entered into an Amendment and Waiver No. 1 to the Credit Agreement to increase the amount of the special dividend permitted to be paid to stockholders on December 5, 2019 to accommodate last minute option exercises and to exclude the May 28, 2019 special dividend from the fixed charges calculation.

At December 31, 2019, the principal balance outstanding under the term note payable was $49.4 million and the balance of the revolving note payable was zero.

The aggregate maturities of our notes payable, as of December 31, 2019, are as follows: $5.0 million in 2020, $7.5 million in 2021, $7.5 million in 2022, $10.0 million in 2023, and $19.4 million in 2024.

Interest payments under the credit facility are due monthly. Principal payments are due quarterly. The loans may be prepaid at any time without penalty. 

The Loan Agreement contains the following financial covenants:

●     We must not exceed a Total Leverage Ratio of 3.25%. This ratio decreases to 3.0% at September 30, 2020, 2.75% at March 31, 2021 and 2.25% at March 31, 2022. This ratio is defined in the Loan Agreement as the ratio of consolidated total funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA minus capitalized software expenditures for the period of the four most recent consecutive fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2019, this debt service coverage ratio was 2.58.

●     We must maintain a Fixed Coverage Charge Ratio of 1.25%. This ratio is defined in the Loan Agreement as the ratio of consolidated EBITDA minus unfinanced capital expenditures to cash interest expense plus scheduled principal payments made plus taxes paid in cash plus restricted payments made in cash. As of December 31, 2019, this debt to tangible net worth ratio was 4.01.

The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants relating to maintaining legal existence and good standing, complying with applicable laws, delivery of financial statements, payment of taxes and maintaining insurance. The Loan Agreement also contains customary events of default including the failure to make payments of principal and interest, the breach of any covenants, the occurrence of a material adverse change, and certain bankruptcy and insolvency events. Additionally, we may be restricted from declaring dividends if an Event of Default exists, or if immediately prior to and after giving effect of such dividend it would cause us to exceed our maximum Total Leverage Ratio, or fall below our minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.

The following table represents the components of our long-term debt disclosed on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

 

Credit facility

 $49,375 

Unamortized debt issuance costs

  (2,055)

Total long-term debt

  47,320 
     

Less current portion of long-term debt

  4,575 
     

Total long-term debt, non-current portion

 $42,745 
     

Interest rate

  5.5%

9.Stock Options, Restricted Stock and Share-Based Compensation



We have granted stock-based incentive awards to our officers and employees under long-term equity incentive plans that originated in 2000, 2006, 2010, 2015 and 2016. We currently issue stock-based awards to our officers and employees under the 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Directors Plan”) and 2016 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“2016 Employee Plan”). The 2015 Directors Plan and 2016 Employee Plan authorize the issuance of up to 500,000 and 5,000,000 shares of common stock for stock-based incentives, including stock options and restricted stock awards, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, stock-based incentives for up to 80,000 and 2,695,928 shares remained available for issuance in the future under these plans, respectively.

Under these stock-based compensation plans under which we have granted, and may grant in the future, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock to employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Our share-based compensation expense was as follows ($ in thousands):

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Share-based compensation expense $973  $647 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Share-based compensation expense

 $2,415  $1,269 

Stock Options

We have stock options outstanding under long-term equity incentive plans that originated in 2000, 2010

During 2019 and 2016. During 2015,2018, we granted stock options only under the 2010 plan. In 2016 we granted stock options under the 2010 plan for most of the year until we reached the cumulative number of shares for which options could be granted under that plan since its inception, which was three million shares. Thereafter, we began granting stock options under a plan originating in 2016 that was approved by our Board of Directors and that is subject to approval by our stockholders at their next annual meeting.


Employee Plan.

Provisions and characteristics of all ofthe options granted to our officers and employees under our long-term equity incentive plans include the following:


·

The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option or stock award granted are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

·

The exercise price of stock options is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share of our stock at market close on that date.

·

Stock options we issue generally become exercisable ratably over a three-year period or following a four year period, expire ten years from the date of grant, and are exercisable for a period of ninety days after the end of employment.

·

Upon exercise of a stock option, we issue new shares from the shares of common stock we are authorized to issue.

62


Subsequent to 2016, we will issue stock-based awards only under the 2016 plan which authorizes the issuance

We have not previously issued any restricted stock under any of these plans.

Our stock option activity has been as follows:

     Weighted  Weighted Average    
     Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Number of  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Shares  Price  Terms  Value 
        (Years)  (000's) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  2,022,175  $2.12   6.07  $710 
                 
2015                
   Granted  538,000  $3.21         
   Forfeitures  (154,650) $2.49         
   Exercised  (314,200) $1.61         
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  2,091,325  $2.45   6.09  $3,277 
                 
2016                
   Granted  1,257,300  $3.58         
   Forfeitures  (404,175) $3.14         
   Exercised  (537,445) $2.08         
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  2,407,005  $3.00   7.19  $2,574 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2016  1,001,570  $2.34   4.55  $1,733 

      

Weighted

  

Weighted Average

     
      

Average

  

Remaining

  

Aggregate

 
  

Number of

  

Exercise

  

Contractual

  

Intrinsic

 
  

Shares

  

Price

  

Terms

  

Value

 
          

(Years)

  

(000's)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

  2,585,210  $3.34   6.77  $1,015 
                 

2018

                

   Granted

  1,052,737  $3.87         

   Forfeitures

  (896,479) $3.58         

   Exercised

  (205,148) $2.55         

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

  2,536,320  $3.53   6.97  $2,464 
                 

2019

                

   Granted

  716,500  $8.01         

   Forfeitures

  (360,006) $2.95         

   Exercised

  (1,329,030) $3.46         

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

  1,563,784  $5.78   8.69  $6,372 
                 

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

  348,979  $3.92   7.72  $2,062 

Additional information about our stock options is as follows:

  

2019

  

2018

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year

 $3.31  $1.57 

Intrinsic value of options exercised during the year

 $10,268,977  $266,010 

Cash received from stock options exercised during the year

 $4,604,137  $522,189 
         

Number of options that vested during the year

  903,390   555,574 

Fair value of options that vested during the year

 $1,435,882  $929,480 
         

Unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options at end of year

 $2,621,209  $1,874,762 

Weighted average years over which non-vested option expense will be recognized

  2.83   2.60 

Plan

Shares outstanding

2010 Employee LT Equity Incentive Plan

50,638

2016 Employee LT Equity Incentive Plan

1,513,146

Total shares outstanding at December 31, 2019

1,563,784

As of December 31, 2019

 
      

Options Outstanding

  

Options Exercisable

 
      

Weighted

             
      

Average

  

Weighted

      

Weighted

 
  

Underlying

  

Remaining

  

Average

  

Number of

  

Average

 

Range of

 

Shares

  

Contractual

  

Exercise

  

Underlying

  

Exercise

 

Exercise Prices

 

Outstanding

  

Life

  

Price

  

Shares

  

Price

 

$1.43 - $2.35

  13,004   2.89  $1.75   13,004  $1.75 

$2.39 - $3.59

  227,614   8.14  $3.46   75,653  $3.31 

$3.60 - $5.90

  622,666   8.27  $4.13   260,322  $4.21 

$6.83 - $10.40

  684,500   9.34  $7.98   -  $- 

$10.70 - $13.29

  16,000   9.75  $12.03   -  $- 

Total options

  1,563,784           348,979     

63

  2016  2015 
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year $1.62  $1.40 
Intrinsic value of options exercised during the year $880,064  $532,224 
Cash received from stock options exercised during the year $1,118,177  $507,289 
         
Number of options that vested during the year  348,116   306,834 
Fair value of options that vested during the year $473,449  $334,788 
         
Unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options at end of year $1,716,384  $780,059 
Weighted average years over which non-vested option expense will be recognized  2.19   2.03 
As of December 31, 2016 
      Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
      Weighted          
      Average  Weighted     Weighted 
   Underlying  Remaining  Average  Number of  Average 
Range of  Shares  Contractual  Exercise  Underlying  Exercise 
Exercise Prices  Outstanding  Life  Price  Shares  Price 
$0.85 - $1.43   116,600   3.36  $1.04   116,600  $1.04 
$1.47 - $2.32   459,745   4.89  $1.83   457,065  $1.83 
$2.34 - $3.52   1,172,660   8.13  $3.22   295,265  $2.87 
$3.53 - $4.21   658,000   7.79  $3.78   132,640  $4.10 
Total options   2,407,005           1,001,570     

We used the following assumptions to determine compensation expense for our stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Expected volatility  55%  57%
Expected annual dividend yield  1.5%  2.4%
Risk free rate of return  1.45%  1.58%
Expected option term (years)  6.00   6.00 

In connection with the departure of one of our executive officers in 2016, we modified stock options previously granted to him to extend the period during which those options could be exercised after the end of his employment. This modification extended that period beyond ninety days after the end of his employment to December 31, 2016. As a result of this modification, we recorded additional share-based compensation expense of $108,000 in 2016.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Expected volatility

  47%  48%

Expected annual dividend yield

  1.5%  1.5%

Risk free rate of return

  2.22%  2.88%

Expected option term (years)

  6.23   5.33 

Restricted Stock Awards


In May 2015,

Prior to the fourth quarter of 2019 we adoptedissued restricted stock only from the 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long Term Incentive Plan (“2015 Directors Plan”). This plan provides forPlan. During the issuancefourth quarter of either stock options or2019, 124,079 shares of restricted stock awards for up to 500,000 shares of our common stock.were granted under the 2016 Employee Plan. Provisions and characteristics of this planthese plans include the following:

·

The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option or stock award granted are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

·

Restricted stock awards are initially issued as restricted shares with a legend restricting transferability of the shares until the recipient satisfies the vesting provision of the award, which is generally continuing service for one year subsequent to the date of the award, after which time the restrictive legend is removed from the shares.

·

Restricted shares participate in dividend payments and may be voted.

·As of December 31, 2016, stock based incentives for up to 340,000 shares remained available for issuance in the future under this plan.

Our restricted stock awards activity has been as follows:

        Total 
     Grant Date  Fair Value of 
  Number of  Fair Value  Shares That 
  Shares  Per Share  Vested 
Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2014  80,000  $2.32    
            
2015           
Shares granted with restrictions  80,000  $3.34    
Shares vested and restrictions removed  (80,000) $2.32  $267,200 
Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2015  80,000  $3.34     
             
2016            
Shares granted with restrictions  80,000  $3.31     
Shares vested and restrictions removed  (80,000) $3.34  $276,000 
Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2016  80,000  $3.31     
We have not issued any stock options under the 2015 Directors Plan.

The 2015 Directors Plan replaced the 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long Term Incentive Plan. We will not issue any additional stock or stock options under the 2006 plan.

          

Total

 
      

Grant Date

  

Fair Value of

 
  

Number of

  

Fair Value

  

Shares That

 
  

Shares

  

Per Share

  

Vested

 
             

Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2017

  80,000  $4.24     
             

2018

            

Shares granted with restrictions

  100,000  $4.06     

Shares vested and restrictions removed

  (80,000) $4.24  $297,600 

Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2018

  100,000  $4.06     
             

2019

            

Shares granted with restrictions

  204,079  $9.27     

Shares vested and restrictions removed

  (120,000) $4.86  $1,283,600 

Restricted Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2019

  184,079  $9.32     

At December 31, 2016,2019, we had $90,437$1,356,423 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards. We expect to recognize that expense in the future over a weighted-average period of fourforty-one months.


9.

10.     Income Taxes


The components of our income tax expense (benefit) are as follows ($consist of the following (amounts in thousands):

  2016  2015 
  Current  Deferred  Total  Current  Deferred  Total 
Federal $1,839  $12  $1,851  $2,008  $(244) $1,764 
State  189   (14)  175   101   (4)  97 
Total $2,028  $(2) $2,026  $2,109  $(248) $1,861 

  

2019

  

2018

 
  

Current

  

Deferred

  

Total

  

Current

  

Deferred

  

Total

 

Federal

 $1,685  $53  $1,738  $993  $(21) $972 

State

  378   (151)  227   238   17   255 

Total

 $2,063  $(98) $1,965  $1,231  $(4) $1,227 


The difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 21% for 2019 and 2018 to income before income taxes consists of the following (amounts in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Income tax expense at federal statutory rate

 $3,199  $1,025 
         

Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:

        

State taxes, net of federal benefit

  128   218 

Stock based compensation

  (1,585)  182 

R&D tax credit uncertain tax position (net)

  (89)  (46)

Research and development credit

  -   (72)

Executive compensation

  461   - 

Foreign derived intangible income

  (184)  (105)

Other

  35   25 

Income tax expense per the statement of operations

 $1,965  $1,227 

Deferred income taxes on our balance sheet reflect the net tax effects ofarise from temporary differences between the carrying amountstax basis of assets and liabilities forand their reported amounts in our consolidated financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.  Significantstatements. The components of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows ($(amounts in thousands):

  As of December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Deferred tax assets:      
Deferred revenue $1,228  $1,154 
Capital loss carryforward  1,099   1,099 
Share-based compensation  578   677 
Compensation and benefits  176   168 
Texas franchise tax R&D credit  153   - 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  114   111 
Net operating loss carryforward  91   151 
Other  51   33 
Less valuation allowances:        
Capital loss carryforward  (1,099)  (1,099)
Texas franchise tax R&D credit  (153)  - 
Total deferred tax assets  2,238   2,294 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Intangible assets  1,289   1,339 
Depreciation  7   15 
Total gross deferred tax liabilities  1,296   1,354 
         
Net deferred tax assets $942  $940 

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Deferred revenue

 $672  $809 

Right-of-use operating lease asset

  609   - 

Share-based compensation

  200   329 

Compensation and benefits

  123   49 

Texas franchise tax R&D credit

  150   194 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  37   37 

State deferred tax asset

  45   45 

Tangible assets

  24   - 

Accrued expenses not deducted for tax

  8   6 

Valuation allowance

  -   (194)

Total deferred tax assets

  1,868   1,275 
         

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Right-of-use operating lease liability

  610   - 

Intangible assets

  567   667 

Deferred expenses

  198   213 

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

  1,375   880 
         

Net deferred tax assets

 $493  $395 

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more-likely-than-not that asome portion or all the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Our assessmentThe ultimate realization of the likelihood of having sufficient taxable income in the future to support deduction or utilization of the items giving rise to our deferred tax assets indicatesis dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We have concluded it is more-likely-than-not that weour ability to generate future taxable income will allow us to realize thethose deferred tax assets listed in the table above.


assets.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had federal incomehave Texas Research and Development tax net operating losscredit carryforwards of $268,000 available to offset future federal taxable income, if any. These carryforwards became available through our acquisition of TappIn, Inc. in 2011.$150,000. These carryforwards expire in 2030years 2034 through 2039.

A reconciliation of the beginning and 2031.


As of December 31, 2016, we had federal income tax capital loss carryforwards of $3,231,000 which resulted from the reduction of our investments in and notes receivable from CoreTrace Corporation in 2012.  We can realize capital loss carryforwards to the extent we have capital gains in future periods against which this capital loss can be deducted.  We believe it uncertain that we will have sufficient capital gains in the future to support this deduction and, accordingly, have provided a valuation allowance for the fullending amount of this carryforward.  This carryforward expiresunrecognized tax benefit is as follows (amounts in 2017.

As of December 31, 2016, we had Texas franchisethousands):

  

2019

  

2018

 

Balance, beginning of year

 $113  $158 

Increases for tax positions related to the current year

  -   - 

Increases for tax positions related to prior years

  -   2 

Decreases for tax positions due to expiring statutes

  (89)  (47)

Balance, end of year

 $24  $113 

Our unrecognized tax benefit is related to research and development activities credit carryforwards of $153,000.  We can realize these tax credit carryforwards to the extent we have sufficient Texas franchise tax in future years.  We believe it uncertain that we will have sufficient Texas Franchise Tax in the future to support utilization of these credits and, accordingly, have provided a valuation allowance for the full amount of this carryforward.  These carryforwards expire in 2034 through 2036.


We claim research and experimentation tax credits, or R&D tax credits,taken on certain of our tax returns and have included the effect of those credits in our provision for income taxes. A routine examination of our 2008, 2009 and 2010 federal income tax returns conducted and completed by the Internal Revenue Service in 2015 resulted in the amount of the R&D tax credits allowed for those years being less than the amounts we claimed on those federal income tax returns. If the Internal Revenue Service examines our federalU.S. income tax returns for 20112017 and later years, we believe they may apply their same criteriathe uncertainty related to the R&D taxrealization of a portion of those credits we claimedbased on those tax returns. Accordingly, we believe it more-likely-than-not that the R&D tax credit allowed for those years may be less than the amounts we have claimed. As a result, we maintain a reserve for an uncertain tax position for this matter in the amount of $116,000 as of December 31, 2016.


The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized tax benefits were as follows ($ in thousands):
  2016  2015 
Balance, beginning of year $90  $125 
Increases for tax positions related to the current year  17   25 
Increases for tax positions related to prior years  9   23 
Decreases for tax positions related to prior years  -   (51)
Decreases due to settlements related to prior years  -   (32)
Balance, end of year $116  $90 
prior experience. We believe it reasonably possible that we will not recognize any of our unrecognized tax benefits during 2017.at least through December 31, 2021. If we realized and recognized any of our gross unrecognized tax benefits such benefits would reduce our effective tax rate in the year of recognition.

We are subjectrecord interest and penalty expense related to taxation in the United Statesincome taxes as interest and in multiple state jurisdictions.  As ofother expense, respectively. At December 31, 2019, no interest or penalties have been or are required to be accrued. Our open tax years are 2016 and forward for our federal income tax returns and 2015 and forward for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.  Our amended federal income tax returns for 2012 and 2011 are subject to examination with the amount of any claim for payment of additional taxes limited to the amount by which the tax due on those amended returns was less than the tax due on the returns for those years as originally filed.  Our state tax returns are subject to examination for varying periods of time by numerous state taxing authorities. Currently, nonemost of our federal or state income tax returnsreturns. We do not file, and are under examination.


To the extent they arise, we record interest and penalty expenses relatednot required to income taxes as components of other expense in our statement of operations.  We incurred no such expenses in 2016 or 2015.

Ourfile, any foreign income tax expense (benefit) reconciles to an income tax expense resulting from applying an assumed statutory federal income rate of 34% to income before income taxes as follows ($ in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate $2,033  $2,172 
         
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:        
State taxes, net of federal benefit  111   62 
Incentive stock options  91   - 
R&D tax credit uncertain tax position (net)  26   (35)
Research and development credit  (150)  (251)
Domestic production activities deduction  (109)  (136)
Other  24   49 
Income tax expense (benefit) per the statement of operations $2,026  $1,861 

10.returns.

11.     Earnings Per Share


Earnings per share for the periods indicated were computed as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

  Year ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Numerators      
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:      
Net income $3,951  $4,528 
         
Denominators        
Denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share:        
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic  21,126   20,824 
         
Dilutive potential common shares        
Stock options and awards  551   542 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share  21,677   21,366 
         
Net income per common share - basic $0.19  $0.22 
Net income per common share – diluted $0.18  $0.21 

11.

  

Year ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Numerators

        

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

        

Net income

 $13,267  $3,654 
         

Denominators

        

Denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share:

        

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

  17,424   20,721 
         

Dilutive potential common shares

        

Stock options and awards

  1,101   296 

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

  18,525   21,017 
         

Net income per common share - basic

 $0.76  $0.18 

Net income per common share – diluted

 $0.72  $0.17 

Our weighted average shares outstanding has decreased due to the repurchase of our outstanding common stock through a modified Dutch auction tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) and the stock repurchase program announced on October 29, 2018.

12.     Dividends


We paid dividends as follows:

  

Year ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Normal dividend per share of common stock

 $0.045  $0.045 

Special dividend per share of common stock

 $3.850  $0.000 

66

  Year ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Dividend per share of common stock $0.060  $0.045 

12.

13.     Stockholders’ Equity

On August 20, 2018, the Company announced the launch of a tender offer to repurchase for cash up to $15 million in value of outstanding shares of our common stock (the “Tender Offer”). The Tender Offer expired on September 19, 2018 and resulted in the purchase of 4,011,013 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $16.8 million. Included with the shares accepted for purchase were 439,585 shares that the Company elected to purchase pursuant to the right to increase the size of the Tender Offer by up to 2.0% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On October 29, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program in compliance with Rules 10b5-1(c)(1)(i)(B) and 10b-18 under the Exchange Act, which resulted in the purchased of an additional 896,348 shares at an approximate cost of $4.0 million.

14.     Employee Benefit Plan


We provide our employees a 401(k) plan under which we make employer matching contributions in amounts determined by our Board of Directors. Our matching contributions were $143,000,$141,000 and $126,000$132,000, for the 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


13.        

15.          Segment and Geographic Disclosures


In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, we

We view our operations and manage our business as principally one segment. As a result, the financial information disclosed herein represents all of the material financial information related to our principal operating segment.


Revenues derived from customersclients and partners located in the United States accounted for approximately 77%76% and 74% of the Company’sour total revenues in 2016for 2019 and approximately 76% of the Company’s total revenues in 2015.2018, respectively.  The remaining revenues were from customersclients and partners located in foreign countries, and each individual foreign country accounted for less than 10% of total revenues in 2016 and 2015.  The Company attributes revenueseach of those years.  We attribute revenue to countries based on the country in which the customerclient or partner is located. None of ourWe have no property andor equipment was located in a foreign country as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.


14.outside the United States.

16.          Concentration of Business Volume and Credit Risk


Our cash and cash equivalents and long-term investments are on deposit in banks and are collectively insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for $750,000. Our balances in excess of that amount are not insured. We may withdraw our cash deposits upon demand but in doing so may forfeit certain earned but unpaid interest on certain certificates of deposit if we redeemed them prior to their maturity date.demand. We maintain our cash with multiple financial institutions of reputable credit to minimize our risk of loss.


We generally provide credit to our customersclients under typical invoice payment terms (for example, net 30) that gives rise to trade accounts receivable from those customers.clients. We do not require collateral from our customers.clients. We perform ongoing evaluations of the credit risk related to offering these payment terms. We provide an allowance for uncollectible accounts based on our historical collections experience and the profile of our accounts receivable.


In order to leverage the resources of third parties, we make our products available for purchase by end users through third-party channel resellers even though those end users can also purchase those products directly from us. During 20162019 and 2015,2018, we earned approximately 14%16% and 11%14%, respectively, of our revenue from such sales through our largest, third-party, channel reseller.


In 20162019 and 2015,2018, approximately 23%,24% and 24%26%, respectively, of our revenues resulted from sales to customersclients in foreign countries.  We received substantially all of our revenues from foreign customersclients in U.S. dollars resulting in limited exchange rate risks.  Our foreign sales are concentrated mostly in Canada, Western Europe and Latin America. 


We use software developers outside the United States to perform a portion of the coding for the development and maintenance of our software products. If we were unable to continue using these developers because of political or economic instability, we may have difficulty finding comparably skilled developers or may have to pay considerably more for the same work, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.





ItemItem 9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

ItemItem 9A.     Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


No system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met. No evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the system of controls has operated effectively in all cases. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.


As of the end of the period covered by this report,

Our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated with the participation of management, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on the evaluation, our Presidentprocedures and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019 to provide reasonable assuranceensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the objectives of disclosure controlsExchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and procedures are met.


reported within the time periods specified in SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision andpreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the participation of ourpolicies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation ofevaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on2019 using the frameworkcriteria set forth in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013 (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.


This annual report does not include an attestation report2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., an independent registered public accounting firm, regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’sas stated in their report was not subject to audit by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law on July 21, 2010, that permits us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


There werehas been no changeschange in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016,annual period covered by this Annual Report and during the subsequent time period through the filing of this Annual Report that have materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Item 9B. Other Information
None.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited GlobalSCAPE, Inc.’s and its subsidiaries (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019 and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements) and our report dated March 16, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/WEAVER AND TIDWELL LLP

Austin, Texas

March 16, 2020

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

ItemItem 10.     Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.


2019.

GlobalSCAPE has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all its employees, including its President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer.  GlobalSCAPE will provide a copy of its Code of Ethics to any person without charge upon written request to:


James W. Albrecht, Jr.

Karen J. Young

Chief Financial Officer

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

4500 Lockhill-Selma, Suite 150

San Antonio, Texas 78249


ItemItem 11.     Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.      

2019.

ItemItem 12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.


2019.

Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.


2019.

ItemItem 14.     Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to GlobalSCAPE’s Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.




2019.

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)

 

Financial Statements and Schedules

   
  

The following financial statements of GlobalSCAPE Inc. are included in Item 8:

   
  ·

Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 20162019 and 20152018

    
  ·

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income — Years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 

    
  ·

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 

    
  ·

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 

    
  ·

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 

   

(2) 

 

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

   

(3) 

 

Exhibits


Exhibit

  

Number

 

Description

3.1

 

Amended Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed November 17, 2006).

   

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company effective as of October 30, 2008 (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed November 5, 2008).

   
4.1

3.3

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company effective as of August 6, 2019 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2019).

4.1

Specimen of Stock Certificate (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).

   
*10.1

4.2

 

Description of Registered Securities (Filed herewith).

*10.1

1998 Stock Option Plan as amended May 13, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-K10 filed May 12, 2000).

   

*10.2

 

2000 Stock Option Plan dated May 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K10 filed May 12, 2000).

   

*10.3

 

Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement of Directors to Agree Not to Claim Any Right of Adjustment dated February 4, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.6 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

   

*10.4

 

Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement for Employees and Consultants to Cancel Options dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

   

*10.5

 

Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter of Officer to Agree Not to Claim Any Right of Adjustment dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.8 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

   

*10.6

 

Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Rights Termination Letter Agreement of Officer to Agree Not to Exercise Options dated February 8, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Form 10 filed May 12, 2000).

   

*10.7

 

Form of 1998 Stock Option Plan Reinstatement and Adjustment Letter for Employees dated December 19, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).

   

*10.8

 

Form of Release and Indemnity Agreement between GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and Employees dated December 19, 2000 (Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K filed April 2, 2001).

*10.9

 
*10.9

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Form 10-K filed April 1, 2002).

   

*10.10

 

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed November 13, 2006)



*10.11 

*10.11

GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed June 5,7, 2007).

   

*10.12

 

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2007).

   

*10.13

 

Form of Employment Agreement for Executive Officers at Vice President-level and above (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 19, 2009).

   

*10.14

 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long Term Equity Incentive Plan dated June 3, 2010 (Filed as Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement filed April 22, 2010).

   

*10.15

 

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan dated June 3, 2010 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2015).

   

*10.16

 

Form of Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 by and between GlobalSCAPE and each of Matthew C. Goulet and James W. Albrecht, Jr. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2015).

   

10.17

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between GlobalSCAPE and each of its directors and named executive officers (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 14,18, 2015).

   

*10.18

 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement filed April 2, 2015).

   

*10.19

 

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement pursuant to the GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2015 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 14,18, 2015).

   

*10.20

 

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan dated June 3, 2010 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2016).

   

10.21

 

Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 9, 2017 by and between Thomas H Brown, David L. Mann and 210 Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed January 9, 2017).

   
14.1

*10.22

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Peter S. Merkulov, dated as of October 18, 2017 (filed as Exhibit (d)(2) to Schedule TO-I filed August 22, 2018).

*10.23

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael P. Canavan, dated as of April 5, 2019 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed April 5, 2019).

*10.24

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and David C. Mello, dated as of April 4, 2019 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed April 4, 2019).

10.25

Severance Agreement and Release of Claims, effective as of August 28, 2018, by and between the Company and Peter Merkulov (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed September 4, 2018).

*10.26

GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2016 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to Schedule 14A, filed March 31, 2017).

*10.27

Amendment to 2016 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed October 31, 2018).

*10.28

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Karen J. Young, dated as of April 4, 2019 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed April 4, 2019).

*10.29

Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert Alpert, dated as of May 14, 2019 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 14, 2019).

*10.30

Credit Agreement, dated November 18, 2019, by and among the Company, the other loan parties party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 18, 2019).

*10.31

Amendment and Waiver No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated January 3, 2020 by and among the Company, the other loan parties party there-to and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Filed herewith).

14.1

Code of Ethics (Filed as Exhibit 14.1 to Form 10-K filed March 27, 2008).

   

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 21.1 to Form 10-K filed March 29, 2012).

   

23.1

 

   
23.2

31.1

 
31.1

   

31.2

 

   

32.1

 

   

101

 

Interactive Data File.


* Management Compensatory Plan or Agreement


Item 16.10-K Summary

None.


Signatures


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Antonio, Texas on March 27, 2017.


16, 2020.

 

GlobalSCAPE, Inc.

   
 

By:

/s/ Matthew C. GouletRobert H. Alpert

  Matthew C. Goulet

Robert H. Alpert

  President and

Chief Executive Officer






Power of Attorney

Each person whose individual signature appears below hereby authorizes and appoints Robert Alpert and Karen Young, and each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act without the other, as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act in his or her name, place and stead and to execute in the name and on behalf of each person, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file any and all amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on March 27, 2017.


16, 2020.

 

Signature

 

Title

    
 

/s/ Matthew C. GouletRobert H. Alpert

 President and

Chief Executive Officer and Director, Chairman

 Matthew C. Goulet

Robert H. Alpert

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

    
 

/s/ James W. Albrecht, Jr.Karen J. Young

 

Chief Financial Officer

 James W. Albrecht, Jr.

Karen J. Young

 

(Principal Finance and Accounting Officer)

    
 

/s/ Thomas W. BrownDavid L. Mann

 Chairman of the Board and

Director

 Thomas W. Brown

David L. Mann

  
    
 /s/ David L. MannDirector
David L. Mann
/s/ Frank M. MorganDirector
Frank M. Morgan

/s/ Dr. Thomas E. Hicks

 

Director

 

Dr. Thomas E. Hicks

  

/s/ C. Clark Webb

Director

C. Clark Webb

74

87