UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORMForm 10-K

(Mark One)

xþ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

¨For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from          to          

For the transition period fromto

Commission file numbernumber: 1-4717


KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN

(Exact name of Companyregistrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 44-0663509

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction

of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

427 West 12th12th Street


Kansas City, Missouri

64105
(Address of principal executive offices) 44-0663509
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

64105
(Zip Code)

Company’s

816.983.1303
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code    (816) 983-1303code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b)12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class


 

Title of Each Class
Name of each exchangeEach Exchange on which registered


Which Registered

Preferred Stock, Par Value $25 Per Share, 4%, Noncumulative

 New York Stock Exchange

Common Stock, $.01 Per Share Par Value

 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g)12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o


     No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Companyregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d)15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Companyregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YESYes xþ     NO  Noo¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Company’sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  xo

Indicate by check mark whether the Companyregistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Act).
Large Accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2)  YES12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes xo     NO  No þ¨

Company Stock.

The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “KSU.” As of June 30, 2003, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Companyregistrant was approximately $742 million (amount computed based on closing prices$2.03 billion at June 30, 2006. There were 76,718,891 shares of $.01 par common stock on New York Stock Exchange). As ofoutstanding at February 27, 2004, 62,633,808 shares of common stock and 242,170 shares of voting preferred stock were outstanding.

15, 2007.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

PortionsREFERENCE

Kansas City Southern’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of the following documents areStockholders which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2006, is incorporated herein by reference into Part of the Form 10-K as indicated:in Parts I and III.


Document


Part of Form 10-K into which incorporated


Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2003Parts I, III



KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN


20062003 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

Table of Contents

    Page

 
PART I
 
Item 1.Business 

3
 1
Item 2.Risk Factors 

7
 14
Item 3.Unresolved Staff Comments 

19
Properties19
Legal Proceedings

 1621
 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 1721
 

Executive Officers of the Company

 17
21
 
 
Item 5.

Market for the Company’sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 1923
 

Selected Financial Data

 2025
 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 2027
 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 5853
 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 6055
 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 106111
 

Controls and Procedures

 106111
Other Information111
 
 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 

111
 107
Item 11.Executive Compensation 

112
 107
Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters

 107112
 

Certain Relationships, and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 108113
 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 108113
  PART IV  
Item 15. 

PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

 109113
 

Signatures

123118

ii


Part I

Registration Rights AgreementItem 1.
BusinessAmended and Restated By-Laws
Third Supplemental Indenture
Second Supplemental Indenture
Form of Restricted Shares Award and Performance Shares Award Agreement
Kansas City Southern Annual Incentive Plan
The 2005 Credit Agreement
Amendment No. 1 and Waiver No. 1 to the 2005 Credit Agreement
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Subsidiaries of the Company
Consent of KPMG LLP
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consent of KPMG Cardenas Dosal, S.C.
Certification of Michael R. Haverty
Certification of Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
Section 1350 Certification of Michael R. Haverty
Section 1350 Certification of Patrick J. Ottensmeyer


Item 1.Business
COMPANY OVERVIEW

Kansas City Southern (“KCS” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company with principaldomestic and international rail operations in rail transportation.

KCS, along with its subsidiaries and affiliates, owns and operates a uniquely positioned North American rail networkAmerica that are strategically focused on the growing north/south freight corridor that connectsconnecting key commercial and industrial markets in the central United States with major industrial cities in Mexico. The Company’s principal subsidiary,KCS and its subsidiaries had approximately 6,470 employees on December 31, 2006. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), which was founded in 1887, is one of sevena U.S. Class I railroads in the United States (railroads with annual revenues of at least $272 million, as indexed for inflation).railroad. KCSR serves a ten-state region in the midwestMidwest and southern partsSoutheast regions of the United States and has the shortest north/south rail route between Kansas City, Missouri and several key ports along the Gulf of Mexico in Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

The Company’s rail network also includes an equity investment in

KCS controls and owns all of the stock of Kansas City Southern de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KCSM”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, Grupo TransportacionKCSM, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo KCSM”), formerly known as Grupo Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V., or Grupo TFM. Through its50-year Concession from the Mexican government (“Grupo TFM”the Concession”), KCSM operates a 46.6% owned unconsolidated affiliate, which owns 80%primary commercial corridor of the stock of TFM, S.A. de C.V. (“TFM”). TFM operates a strategically significant corridor between Mexico and the United States,Mexican railroad system and has as its core route a key portion of the shortest, most direct rail passageway between Mexico City and Laredo, Texas. TFMKCSM serves most of Mexico’s principal industrial cities and three of its major shipping ports. TFM’sKCSM’s rail lines are the only ones whichthat serve Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, the largest rail freight exchangeinterchange point between the United States and Mexico.

TFM wholly-owns Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”). Mexrail owns 100% of The Texas-Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”). Tex-Mex operates a 157-mile rail line extending from Laredo to Under the port city of Corpus Christi, Texas and connects the operations of KCSR with TFM. Tex-Mex connects with TFM at Laredo and connects to KCSR through trackage rights at Beaumont, Texas. TFM, through its concession with the Mexican government,Concession, KCSM has the right to control and operate the southern half of the rail-bridgerail bridge at Laredo, and, indirectly through its ownership of Mexrail, owns the northern half of the rail-bridge at Laredo,Texas, which spans the Rio Grande River between the United States and Mexico.

The Company wholly owns, directly and indirectly, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”) which, in turn, wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”). Tex-Mex operates a157-mile rail line extending from Laredo, Texas to the port city of Corpus Christi, Texas, which connects the operations of KCSR with KCSM. Tex-Mex connects with KCSM at the United States/Mexico border at Laredo, Texas, and connects to KCSR through trackage rights at Beaumont, Texas. Through its ownership of Mexrail, the Company owns the northern half of the rail bridge at Laredo, Texas. Laredo is a principal international gateway through which more than 50%half of all rail and truck traffic between the United States and Mexico crosses the border.

Together, the Company’s

The KCS rail network (KCSR, and equitable interests in TFMKCSM and Tex-Mex) comprises approximately 6,000 miles of main and branch lines extending from the midwestMidwest and Southeast portions of the United States south into Mexico. Additionally, through a strategic alliance with Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”) and Illinois Central Corporation (“IC” and together with CN, “CN/IC”), the Company has access to a contiguous rail network of approximately 25,000 miles of main and branch lines connecting Canada, the United States and Mexico. The CN/IC alliance connects Canadian markets with major midwestern and southern markets in the United States as well as with major markets in Mexico through KCSR’s connections with Tex-Mex and TFM. Management believes that, as a result of the strategic position of our rail network, the Company is poised to continue to benefit from the growing north/south trade between the United States, Mexico and Canada promoted by the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”).

KCS’s rail network is further expanded through marketing agreementsconnects with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk Southern”), The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (“BNSF”) and the Iowa, Chicago & Eastern Railroad Corporation (“IC&E” – formerly I&M Rail Link, LLC). Marketing agreements with Norfolk Southern allow the Company to capitalize on its east/west route from Meridian, Mississippi to Dallas, Texas (“Meridian Speedway”) to gain incremental traffic volume between the southeast and the southwest. The marketing alliance with BNSF was developed to promote cooperation, revenue growth and extend market reach for both railroads in the United States and Canada. It is also designed to improve

operating efficiencies for both KCSR and BNSF in key market areas, as well as provide customers with expanded service options.KCSR’s marketing agreement with IC&E provides access to Minneapolis, Minnesota and Chicago, Illinois and to the origination of corn and other grain traffic in Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois.

The Company’s rail network interconnects with all other Class I railroads, and providesproviding shippers with an effective alternative to other railroad routes and giving direct access to Mexico and the southeasternSoutheast and southwesternSouthwest United States through less congested interchange hubs.

The Company

KCS also owns 50%a fifty percent equity investment in the stock of the common stock (or a 42% equity interest) of the Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), which holds the concession to operate a 47-mile coast-to-coast47-milecoast-to-coast railroad located adjacent to the Panama Canal. The railroad handles containers in freight service across the isthmus.Isthmus of Panama. Panarail Tourism Company (“Panarail”), a wholly owned subsidiary of PCRC, operates a commuter and tourist railway serviceservices over the lines of the Panama Canal Railway. Passenger and freight service commenced during 2001.

PCRC.

Other subsidiaries and affiliates of KCS include the following:
• Meridian Speedway, LLC (“MSLLC”), a ninety percent owned consolidated affiliate that owns the former KCSR rail line between Meridian, Mississippi and Shreveport, Louisiana, which is the portion of the KCSR rail line between Dallas, Texas and Meridian known as the “Meridian Speedway.” Norfolk Southern Corporation (“NS”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, owns the remaining ten percent of MSLLC. Ultimately KCS will own seventy percent and NS will own thirty percent of MSLLC upon the contribution of additional capital by NS to MSLLC;


3

Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (“Southern Capital”), a 50% owned unconsolidated affiliate that leases locomotive and rail equipment to KCSR;

Trans-Serve, Inc., (d/b/a Superior Tie and Timber—“ST&T”), an owner/operator of a railroad wood tie treating facility;

PABTEX GP, LLC (“Pabtex”) located in Port Arthur, Texas. Pabtex is an owner of a bulk materials handling facility with deep-water access to the Gulf of Mexico that stores and transfers petroleum coke and soda ash from trucks and rail cars to ships, primarily for export; and

Transfin Insurance, Ltd., a single-parent captive insurance company, providing property, general liability and certain other insurance coverage to KCS and its subsidiaries and affiliates.


KCS was organized in 1962 as Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. and in 2002 formally changed its name to Kansas City Southern. KCS, as the holding company, supplies its various subsidiaries with managerial, legal, tax, financial and accounting services, in addition to managing other minor “non-operating” investments.

The information set forth in response to Item 101 of Regulation S-K under Part II Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in partial response to this Item 1.

RAIL NETWORK

Owned Network

KCSR owns and operates approximately 3,100 miles of main and branch lines and 1,250 miles of other tracks in a ten-state region that includes Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Louisiana,

• PABTEX GP, LLC, a wholly-owned and consolidated owner of a bulk materials handling facility with deep-water access to the Gulf of Mexico at Port Arthur, Texas and Illinois. KCSR has the shortest north/south rail route between Kansas City and several key ports along the Gulf of Mexico in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. KCSR’s rail route also serves the Meridian Speedway and the east/west route linking Kansas City with East St. Louis, Illinois and Springfield, Illinois. In addition, KCSR has limited haulage rights between Springfield and Chicago that allow for originating or terminating shipments on the rail lines of the former Gateway Western Railway Company (“Gateway Western”). These lines also provide access to East St. Louis and allow rail traffic to avoid the St. Louis, Missouri terminal. The geographic reach of KCSR enables service to a customer base that includes electric generating utilities, which use coal, and a wide range of companies in the chemical and petroleum, agricultural and mineral, paper and forest products, and automotive and intermodal markets.

Eastern railroads and their customers can use the Company’s rail network to bypass the gateways at Chicago; St. Louis; Memphis, Tennessee and New Orleans by interchanging with KCSR at Springfield and East St. Louis and at Meridian and Jackson, Mississippi. Other railroads can also interconnect with the Company’s rail network via other gateways at Kansas City; Birmingham, Alabama; Shreveport and New Orleans, Louisiana; and Dallas, Beaumont and Laredo, Texas.

KCSR revenues and net income are dependent on providing reliable service to customers at competitive rates, the general economic conditions in the geographic region served and the ability to effectively compete against other rail carriers and alternative modes of surface transportation, such as over-the-road truck transportation. The ability of KCSR to construct and maintain the roadway in order to provide safe and efficient transportation service is important to its ongoing viability as a rail carrier. Additionally, cost containment is important in maintaining a competitive market position, particularly with respect to employee costs, as approximately 84% of KCSR employees are covered under various collective bargaining agreements.

Significant Investments

Grupo TFM

In December 1995, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM”) to, among other things, provide for participation in the privatization of the Mexican national railway system and to promote the movement of rail traffic over Tex-Mex, TFM and KCSR. Pursuant to written notice given by TMM’s successor, Grupo TMM, S.A., and in accordance with its terms, the joint venture agreement terminated on December 1, 2003. In 1997, the Company invested $298 million to obtain a 36.9% interest in Grupo TFM, the company formed by KCS and TMM under the joint venture agreement for the purpose of participating in the privatization of the Mexican national railway system. At the time Grupo TFM purchased 80% of the shares of TFM, TMM, the largest shareholder of Grupo TFM, owned 38.5% of Grupo TFM and the Mexican government owned the remaining 24.6%. In 2002, KCS and Grupo TMM exercised their call option on the Mexican government’s Grupo TFM shares and, on July 29, 2002, TFM completed the purchase of the Mexican government’s 24.6% ownership of Grupo TFM. The $256.1 million purchase price was funded utilizing a combination of proceeds from an offering of debt securities by TFM, a credit from the Mexican government for the reversion of certain rail facilities and other resources. This transaction increased the Company’s ownership percentage of Grupo TFM from 36.9% to approximately 46.6%. Grupo TFM owns 80% of the stock of TFM (all of which shares are entitled to full voting rights) while the remaining 20% of TFM (with limited voting rights) is owned by the Mexican government.

TFM holds the concession, which was awarded by the Mexican government in 1996, to operate Mexico’s Northeast Rail Lines (the “Concession”; the Northeast Rail Lines are now known as “TFM”) for 50 years ending in June 2047. Subject to certain conditions, TFM has an option to extend the Concession for an additional 50 years. The Concession is subject to certain mandatory trackage rights and is exclusive until 2027. The Mexican government, however, may revoke TFM’s exclusivity after 2017 if it determines that there is insufficient competition and may terminate the Concession as a result of certain conditions or events, including (1) TFM’s failure to meet its operating and financial obligations with regard to the Concession under applicable Mexican law, (2) a statutory appropriation by the Mexican government for reasons of public interest and (3) liquidation or bankruptcy of TFM. TFM’s assets and its rights under the Concession may, under certain circumstances such as natural disaster, war or other similar situations, also be seized temporarily by the Mexican government.

Under the Concession, TFM operates a strategically significant corridor between Mexico and the United States, and has as its core route a key portion of the shortest, most direct rail passageway between Mexico City and Laredo. TFM’s rail lines are the only ones which serve Nuevo Laredo, the largest rail freight exchange point between the United States and Mexico. TFM’s rail lines connect the most populated and industrialized regions of Mexico with Mexico’s principal U.S. border railway gateway at Laredo. In addition, TFM serves three of Mexico’s primary seaports at Veracruz and Tampico on the Gulf of Mexico and Lazaro Cardenas on the Pacific

Ocean. TFM serves 15 Mexican states and Mexico City, which together represent a majority of the country’s population and account for a majority of its estimated gross domestic product. KCS management believes the Laredo gateway is the most important interchange point for rail freight between the United States and Mexico. As a result, KCS management believes that TFM’s routes are an integral part of Mexico’s foreign trade infrastructure.

This route structure enables the Company to benefit from growing trade resulting from the increasing integration of the North American economy through NAFTA. Through Tex-Mex and KCSR, as well as through interchanges with other major U.S. railroads, TFM provides its customers with access to an extensive rail network through which they may distribute their products throughout North America and overseas.

TFM operates approximately 2,650 miles of main and branch lines and certain additional sidings, spur tracks and main line tracks under trackage rights. TFM has the right to operate the rail lines through the Concession, but does not own the land, roadway or associated structures.

TFM, including its indirect ownership of Tex-Mex, is both a strategic and financial investment for KCS. Strategically, the Company’s investment in TFM promotes the NAFTA growth strategy, whereby KCS and its strategic partners can provide transportation services between the heart of Mexico’s industrial base, the United States and Canada. TFM seeks to establish its railroad as the primary inland freight transporter linking Mexico with the U.S. and Canadian markets along the NAFTA corridor. TFM’s strategy is to provide reliable customer service, capitalize on foreign trade growth and convert truck tonnage to rail.

KCS management believes TFM is an excellent long-term financial investment. TFM’s operating strategy has been to increase productivity and maximize operating efficiencies. With Mexico’s economic progress, growth of NAFTA trade between Mexico, the United States and Canada, and customer focused rail service, KCS management believes that the growth potential of TFM could be significant.

As further described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments—Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM from Grupo TMM”, on April 20, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Grupo TMM and other parties (“Acquisition Agreement”) under which KCS ultimately would acquire control of TFM through the purchase of shares of common stock of Grupo TFM (“Acquisition”). The obligations of KCS and Grupo TMM to complete the Acquisition are subject to a number of conditions. Grupo TMM and KCS are currently in dispute over Grupo TMM’s attempt to terminate the Acquisition Agreement. This dispute could adversely affect TFM’s operations and business.

On January 21, 2004, Moody’s Investors Service, or Moody’s, announced that it had placed the B1 senior unsecured debt rating of TFM under review for possible downgrade. Moody’s announced that, as part of the current review, it will consider the implications of these issues—the Grupo TMM/KCS dispute, the value and rights for the VAT reimbursement, and the obligations under the Mexican government’s put of TFM shares.

On February 26, 2004, Grupo TMM announced that during the fourth quarter of 2003, TFM failed to meet certain financial covenant ratios under its term loan facility and its commercial paper program. The press release stated that TFM was negotiating with its lenders on amendments to these credit agreements, which would retroactively amend the covenants and would effectively cure the defaults, and that TFM is also in the process of refinancing its commercial paper program to extend the maturity date to 2006. On March 11, 2004, Grupo TFM announced that effective March 10, 2004, it had received a waiver from the banks that participate in the term loan facility and commercial paper program and that it was waived from the financial covenants for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and for the period from January 1, 2004 through May 11, 2004.

The Mexican government has the right to compel the purchase of its 20% interest in TFM (referred to as the “Put”) by Grupo TFM following notification by the Mexican government in accordance with the terms of the

applicable agreements. Upon exercise of the Put, Grupo TFM would be obligated to purchase the TFM capital stock at the initial share price paid by Grupo TFM adjusted for interest and inflation. Prior to October 30, 2003, Grupo TFM filed suit in the Federal District Court of Mexico City seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment interpreting whether Grupo TFM was obligated to honor its obligation under the Put agreement, as the Mexican government had not made any effort to sell the TFM shares subject to the Put prior to October 31, 2003. In its suit, Grupo TFM named Grupo TMM and KCS as additional interested parties. The Mexican Court has admitted Grupo TFM’s complaint and issued an injunction that would, following the posting of a bond by Grupo TFM, block the Mexican government from exercising the Put. The Mexican government provided Grupo TFM with notice of its intention to sell its interest in TFM on October 30, 2003. Grupo TFM has responded to the Mexican government’s notice reaffirming its right and interest in purchasing the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM, but also advising the Mexican government that it would not take any action until its lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment was resolved. In the event that Grupo TFM does not purchase the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM, Grupo TMM and KCS, or either of Grupo TMM or KCS alone, would, following notification by the Mexican government in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements, be obligated to purchase the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM. As this matter is currently the subject of litigation in Mexico to which the Mexican government, Grupo TFM, Grupo TMM and KCS are parties, KCS management does not believe it is likely that the Mexican government will seek to exercise the Put until the litigation is resolved. Based upon public disclosures made by Grupo TMM, it is not in a position to make this purchase. Following the resolution of the lawsuit in Mexico, should Grupo TFM fail to purchase the Mexican government’s TFM shares in accordance with the terms of the Put, then the Mexican government has the right to put all the shares of TFM to KCS. In such an event, KCS would have the right, but not the obligation, to put 51% of the shares purchased by KCS to Grupo TMM. However, there can be no assurance that Grupo TMM would have the financial resources necessary to purchase those shares. If the Acquisition is completed, KCS will be solely responsible for purchasing the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM. If KCS had been required to purchase this interest as of December 31, 2003, the total purchase price would have been approximately $467.7 million.

The original term of the Grupo TFM joint venture agreement was renewed for a term of three years on December 1, 2000. Pursuant to written notice given by Grupo TMM, and in accordance with its terms, the joint venture agreement terminated on December 1, 2003. The joint venture did not have any material assets and management believes that the termination of the joint venture agreement will not have a material adverse effect on the Company or its interest in Grupo TFM.

The shareholders agreement dated May 1997 between KCS and Grupo TMM and certain affiliates, which governs the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM (1) restricts each of the parties to the shareholders agreement from directly or indirectly transferring any interest in Grupo TFM or TFM to a competitor of Grupo TFM, TFM or the parties without the prior written consent of each of the parties, and (2) provides that KCS and Grupo TMM may not transfer control of any subsidiary holding all or any portion of shares of Grupo TFM to a third party, other than an affiliate of the transferring party or another party to the shareholders agreement, without the consent of the other parties to the shareholders agreement. The Grupo TFM bylaws prohibit any transfer of shares of Grupo TFM to any person other than an affiliate of the existing shareholders without the prior consent of Grupo TFM’s board of directors. In addition, the Grupo TFM bylaws grant the shareholders of Grupo TFM a right of first refusal to acquire shares to be transferred by any other shareholder in proportion to the number of shares held by each non-transferring shareholder, although holders of preferred shares or shares with special or limited rights are only entitled to acquire those shares and not ordinary shares. The shareholders agreement requires that the boards of directors of Grupo TFM and TFM be constituted to reflect the parties’ relative ownership of the ordinary voting common stock of Grupo TFM.

Tex-Mex

On February 27, 2002, the Company, Grupo TMM, and certain of Grupo TMM’s affiliates entered into a stock purchase agreement with TFM to sell to TFM all of the common stock of Mexrail. The sale closed on March 27, 2002 and the Company received approximately $31.4 million for its 49% interest in Mexrail. The

Company used the proceeds from the sale of Mexrail to reduce debt. Although the Company no longer directly owns 49% of Mexrail, it retains an indirect ownership through its 46.6% ownership of Grupo TFM. Under the stock purchase agreement, KCS retained rights to prevent further sale or transfer of the stock or significant assets of Mexrail and Tex-Mex and the right to continue to participate in the corporate governance of Mexrail and Tex-Mex, which will remain U.S. corporations and subject to the Company’s super majority rights contained in Grupo TFM’s bylaws.

Tex-Mex connects to KCSR through trackage rights over the rail lines of the Union Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”) between Robstown, Texas and Beaumont. These trackage rights were granted pursuant to a 1996 Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) decision and have an initial term of 99 years. Tex-Mex provides a vital link between the Company’s U.S. operations through KCSR and its Mexican operations through TFM.

On March 12, 2001, Tex-Mex purchased from UP a line of railroad right-of-way extending 84.5 miles between Rosenberg, Texas and Victoria, Texas, and granted Tex-Mex trackage rights sufficient to integrate the line into the existing trackage rights. The line is not in service and will require extensive reconstruction, which has not yet been scheduled. The purchase price for the line of $9.2 million was determined through arbitration and the acquisition also required the prior approval or exemption of the transaction by the STB. By its Order entered on December 8, 2000, the STB granted Tex-Mex’s Petition for Exemption and exempted the transaction from this prior approval requirement. Once reconstruction of the line is completed, Tex-Mex will be able to shorten its existing route between Corpus Christi and Houston, Texas by over 70 miles.

Panama Canal Railway Company

In January 1998, the Republic of Panama awarded PCRC, a joint venture company formed by KCSR and Mi-Jack Products, Inc. (“Mi-Jack”), the concession to reconstruct and operate the Panama Canal Railway, a 47-mile railroad located adjacent to the Panama Canal that provides international shippers with a railway transportation option to complement the Panama Canal. The Panama Canal Railway, which traces its origins back to the mid-1800’s, is a north-south railroad traversing the Panama isthmus between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The railroad has been reconstructed and it resumed freight operations in December 2001. KCS management believes the prime potential and opportunity for this railroad to be in the movement of container traffic between the ports of Balboa and Colon for shipping customers repositioning such containers. The Panama Canal Railway has significant interest from both shipping companies and port terminal operators. In addition, there is demand for passenger traffic for both commuter and pleasure/tourist travel. Panarail operates and promotes commuter and tourist passenger service over the Panama Canal Railway. Passenger service started during July 2001. While only 47 miles long, KCS management believes the Panama Canal Railway provides the Company with a unique opportunity to participate in transoceanic shipments as a complement to the existing Panama Canal traffic.

As of December 31, 2003, the Company has invested approximately $21.0 million toward the reconstruction and operations of the Panama Canal Railway. This investment is comprised of $12.9 million of equity and $8.1 million of subordinated loans. These loans carry a 10% interest rate and are payable on demand, subject to certain restrictions.

In November 1999, PCRC completed the financing for the reconstruction project with the International Finance Corporation (“IFC”), a member of the World Bank Group. The financing was comprised of a $5 million investment by the IFC and senior loans through the IFC in an aggregate amount of up to $45 million. Additionally, PCRC has $3.4 million of equipment loans and other capital leases totaling $3.0 million. The IFC’s investment of $5 million in PCRC is comprised of non-voting preferred shares which pay a 10% cumulative dividend. As of December 31, 2003, PCRC has recorded a $2.0 million liability for these cumulative preferred dividends. The preferred shares may be redeemed at the IFC’s option any year after 2008 at the lower of (1) a net

cumulative internal rate of return of 30% or (2) eight times earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization for the two years preceding the redemption that is proportionate to the IFC’s percentage ownership in PCRC. Under the terms of the loan agreement with IFC, the Company is a guarantor for up to $5.6 million of the associated debt. Also if PCRC terminates the concession contract without the IFC’s consent, the Company is a guarantor for up to 50% of the outstanding senior loans. The Company is also a guarantor for up to $1.8 million of the equipment loans and approximately $100,000 relating to other capital leases. The cost of the reconstruction totaled approximately $80 million. The Company expects to loan an additional $3.5 million to PCRC during 2004 under the same terms as the existing $8.1 million subordinated loans.

Southern Capital

In 1996, KCSR and GATX Capital Corporation (“GATX”) formed a 50-50 joint venture—Southern Capital—to perform certain leasing and financing activities. Southern Capital’s operations are comprised of the acquisition of locomotives, rolling stock and other rail equipment and the leasing thereof to KCSR. Concurrent with the formation of this joint venture, KCSR entered into operating leases with Southern Capital for substantially all the locomotives and rolling stock that KCSR contributed or sold to Southern Capital at the time of formation of the joint venture. GATX contributed cash in the joint venture transaction formation.

The purpose for the formation of Southern Capital was to partner a Class I railroad in KCSR with an industry leader in the rail equipment financing in GATX. Southern Capital provides the Company with access to equipment financing alternatives.

Expanded Network

Through its strategic alliance with CN/IC and marketing agreements with Norfolk Southern, BNSF and the IC&E, the Company has expanded the domestic geographic reach beyond that covered by its owned network.

Strategic Alliance with Canadian National and Illinois Central.

In 1998, KCSR, CN and IC entered into a 15-year strategic alliance to coordinate the marketing, operations and investment elements of north-south rail freight transportation. The strategic alliance did not require STB approval and was effective immediately. This alliance connects Canadian markets, the major Midwest U.S. markets of Detroit, Michigan; Chicago, Kansas City and St. Louis and the key southern markets of Memphis, Dallas and Houston. It also provides U.S. and Canadian shippers with access to Mexico’s rail system through connections with Tex-Mex and TFM.

In addition to providing access to key north-south international and domestic U.S. traffic corridors, the alliance with CN/IC is intended to increase business primarily in the automotive and intermodal markets, the grain market, the chemical and petroleum market and the paper and forest products markets. This alliance has provided opportunities for revenue growth and positioned the Company as a key provider of rail service for NAFTA trade.

KCSR and CN formed a management group made up of senior management representatives from both railroads to, among other things, guide the realization of the alliance goals, and to develop plans for the construction of new facilities to support business development, including investments in automotive, intermodal and transload facilities at Memphis, Dallas, Kansas City and Chicago.

Under a separate agreement, KCSR was granted certain trackage and haulage rights and CN and IC were granted certain haulage rights. Under the terms of this agreement, and through action taken by the STB, in 2000 KCSR gained access to six additional chemical customers in the Geismar, Louisiana industrial area through haulage rights.

Marketing Agreements with Norfolk Southern.

In December 1997, KCSR entered into a three-year marketing agreement with Norfolk Southern and Tex-Mex that allows KCSR to increase its traffic volume along the east-west corridor between Meridian and Dallas by using interchange points with Norfolk Southern. This agreement provides Norfolk Southern run-through service with access to Dallas and the Mexican border at Laredo while avoiding the rail gateways of Memphis and New Orleans. This agreement was renewed in December 2003 for a term of three years and will be automatically renewed for additional three-year terms unless written notice of termination is given at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term.

In May 2000, KCSR entered into an additional marketing agreement with Norfolk Southern under which KCSR provides haulage services for intermodal traffic between Meridian and Dallas in exchange for fees from Norfolk Southern. Under this agreement Norfolk Southern may quote rates and enter into transportation service contracts with shippers and receivers covering this haulage traffic. This agreement terminates on December 31, 2006 and provides KCSR with additional sources of intermodal business. Under the current arrangement, trains run between KCSR’s connection with Norfolk Southern at Meridian and the BNSF connection at Dallas. The structure of the agreement provides for lower gross revenue to KCSR, but improved operating income since, as a haulage arrangement, locomotives, locomotive fuel and car hire expenses are the responsibility of Norfolk Southern, not KCSR. Management believes this business has additional growth potential as Norfolk Southern may seek to shift its traffic to southern gateways to increase its length of haul.

Marketing Alliance with BNSF

In April 2002, KCSR and BNSF formed a comprehensive joint marketing alliance aimed at promoting cooperation, revenue growth and extending market reach for both railroads in the United States and Canada. The marketing alliance was also designed to improve operating efficiencies for both carriers in key market areas, as well as provide customers with expanded service options. KCSR and BNSF have agreed to coordinate marketing and operational initiatives in a number of target markets. The marketing alliance allows the two railroads to be more responsive to shippers’ requests for rates and service throughout the two rail networks. Coal and unit train operations are excluded from the marketing alliance, as well as any points where KCSR and BNSF are the only direct rail competitors. Movements to and from Mexico by either party are also excluded. Management believes this marketing alliance provides important opportunities to grow KCSR’s revenue base, particularly in the chemical, grain and forest product markets, and provides participants with expanded access to important markets and shippers with enhanced options and competitive alternatives.

Marketing Agreement with IC&E.

In May 1997, KCSR entered into a marketing agreement with I&M Rail Link, now known as IC&E. This marketing agreement provides KCSR with access to Minneapolis and Chicago and to the origination of corn and other grain traffic in Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois. Through this marketing agreement, KCSR receives and originates shipments of grain products for delivery to poultry industry feed mills on its network. Grain is currently KCSR’s largest export into Mexico. This agreement is terminable upon 90 days notice. Management believes this agreement provides IC&E with an important channel of distribution over our rail network versus other railroads.

Haulage Rights.

As a result of the 1988 acquisition of the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad by UP, KCSR was granted (1) haulage rights between Kansas City and each of Council Bluffs, Iowa, Omaha and Lincoln, Nebraska and Atchison and Topeka, Kansas, and (2) a joint rate agreement for our grain traffic between Beaumont and each of Houston and Galveston, Texas. KCSR has the right to convert these haulage rights to trackage rights. KCSR’s haulage rights require UP to move KCSR traffic in UP trains; trackage rights would allow KCSR to operate its trains over UP tracks. These rights have a term of 199 years. In addition, KCSR has limited haulage rights between Springfield and Chicago that allow for shipments that originate or terminate on the former Gateway Western’s rail lines.

Markets Served

Chemical and Petroleum

Chemical and petroleum products accounted for approximately 21.5% of KCSR revenues in 2003. KCSR transports chemical and petroleum products via tank and hopper cars primarily to markets in the southeast and northeast United States through interchanges with other rail carriers. Primary traffic includes plastics, petroleum and oils, petroleum coke, rubber, and miscellaneous chemicals. KCSR’s access to six additional chemical customers in the Geismar, Louisiana industrial corridor has resulted in additional revenue for KCSR and management believes it could provide future competitive opportunities for revenue growth as existing contracts with other rail carriers expire for these customers.

Paper and Forest Products

Paper and forest products accounted for approximately 25.4% of 2003 KCSR revenues. The Company’s rail lines run through the heart of the southeastern U.S. timber-producing region. Management believes that stores and transfers petroleum coke and soda ash from trucks and rail cars to ships, primarily for export;

• Trans-Serve, Inc. (doing business as Superior Tie and Timber), a wholly-owned and consolidated operator of a railroad wood tie treatment facility;
• Transfin Insurance, Ltd., a wholly-owned and consolidated captive insurance company, providing property, general liability and certain other insurance coverage to KCS and its subsidiaries and affiliates;
• Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (“Southern Capital”), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate that leases locomotives and rail equipment; and
• Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”), a twenty five percent owned unconsolidated affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary services in the greater Mexico City area.
MARKETS SERVED

Chemical and Petroleum.  KCS transports chemical and petroleum products via tank and hopper cars to markets in the Southeast and Northeast United States and throughout Mexico through interchanges with other rail carriers. Primary traffic includes plastics, petroleum, oils, petroleum coke, rubber and miscellaneous chemicals.

Forest Products and Metals.  KCS’ rail lines run through the heart of the Southeast United States timber-producing region. The Company believes that
2006 Revenues
Business Mix
 
forest products made from trees in this region are generally less expensive than those from other regions due to lower production costs. As a result, southern yellow pine products from the southeastSoutheast are increasingly being used at the expense of western producers whothat have experienced capacity reductions because of public policy considerations. KCSR serves eleven paper mills directly and six others indirectly through short-line connections. Primary traffic
This product category includes pulpmetals, minerals and paper, lumber, panelores such as iron, steel, zinc and copper. The majority of metals, minerals and ores mined, and steel produced in Mexico are used for domestic consumption. The volume of Mexican steel exports fluctuates based on global market prices. Higher-end finished products (plywoodsuch as steel coils used by Mexican manufacturers in automobiles, household appliances and oriented strand board), engineered wood products, pulpwood, woodchips, raw fiber used inother consumer goods are imported through Nuevo Laredo and through the production of paper, pulp and paperboard, as well as metal, scrap andseaports served by KCS’ rail lines. United States slab steel, waste and military equipment. Slab steel products are used primarily in the manufacture of drill pipe for the oil industry, and military equipment is shipped to and from several military bases on the Company’s rail lines.

industry.

Agricultural and MineralMineral.

Agricultural and mineral products accounted for approximately 18.9% of KCSR revenues in 2003.  Agricultural products consist of domestic and export grain, food and related products. Shipper demand for agricultural products is affected by competition among sources of grain and grain products, as well as price fluctuations in international markets for key commodities. In the domestic grain business, the Company’sUnited States, KCS’ rail lines receive and originate shipments of grain and grain products for delivery to feed mills serving the poultry industry. Through the marketing agreement with IC&E, the Company’s rail lines have access to sources of corn and other grain in Iowa and other Midwestern states. KCSRKCS currently serves 35 feed mills along its rail lines throughout Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. ExportThrough its marketing agreements, KCS has access to sources of corn and other grain in Iowa and other Midwest states. United States export grain shipments and Mexico import grain shipments include primarily corn, wheat, and soybeans transported to Mexico via Laredo and corn transported to the Gulf of Mexico for overseas destinations and to Mexico via Laredo.destinations. Over the long term, export grain shipments to Mexico are expected to increase as a result of the Company’s strategic investments in Tex-Mex and TFM, given Mexico’s reliance on grain imports. Food and related products consist mainly of soybean meal, grain meal, oils and canned goods, sugar and beer. Mineral shipments consist of a variety of products including ores, clay, stone and cement.


4


Intermodal and AutomotiveAutomotive.

Intermodal and automotive products accounted for approximately 10.3% of 2003 KCSR revenues.  The intermodal freight business consists primarily of hauling freight containers or truck trailers by a combination of water, railfrom motor carriers and motor carriers,ocean liners, with rail carriers serving as the link between the other modes of transportation.long-distance haulers. The Company’s intermodalautomotive business has grown significantly over the last ten years with intermodal units increasing from 61,748 in 1993 to 303,507 in 2003 and intermodal revenues increasing from $17 million to $53 million during the same period. Through our dedicated intermodal train service between Meridian and Dallas, the Company competes directly with truck carriers along the Interstate 20 corridor.

The intermodal business is highly price and service driven as the trucking industry maintains certain competitive advantages over the rail industry. Trucks are not obligated to provide or maintain rights of way and do not have to pay real estate taxes on their routes. In prior years, the trucking industry diverted a substantial

amount of freight from railroads as truck operators’ efficiency over long distances increased. In response to these competitive pressures, railroad industry management sought avenues to improve the competitiveness of rail traffic and forged numerous alliances with truck companies in order to move more traffic by rail and provide faster, safer and more efficient service to their customers. KCSR has entered into agreements with several trucking companies for train service in several corridors, but those services are concentrated between Dallas and Meridian.

The strategic alliance with CN/IC and marketing agreements with Norfolk Southern provide the Company the opportunity to further capitalize on the growth potential of intermodal freight revenues, particularly for traffic moving between points in the upper Midwest and Canada to Kansas City, Dallas and Mexico. Furthermore, the Company is developing the former Richards-Gebaur Airbase in Kansas City as a U.S. customs pre-clearance processing facility, the Kansas City International Freight Gateway (“IFG”), which, when at full capacity, is expected to handle and process large volumes of domestic and international intermodal freight. Through an agreement with Mazda through the Ford Motor Company’s Claycomo manufacturing facility located in Kansas City, KCSR has developed an automotive loading and distribution facility at IFG. This loading and distribution facility became operational in April 2000 for the movement of Mazda vehicles. During 2003, the IFG served Ford through the loading and delivery of its new F-150 truck. Management believes that, as additional opportunities arise, the IFG facility will be expanded to include additional automotive and intermodal operations.

The Company’s automotive traffic consists primarily of vehiclemoving parts moving into Mexico from the northern sections of the United Statesto assembly plants and finished vehicles moving from Mexico into the United States. CN/IC, Norfolk Southernto distribution centers for market consumption in North and TFM have a numberSouth America.

Coal.  KCS hauls unit trains of automotive production facilities on their rail lines. The Company’s rail network essentially serves as the connecting bridge carriercoal for these movements of automotive parts and finished vehicles.

Coal

Coal historically has been one of the most stable sources of revenues and is the largest single commodity handled by KCSR. In 2003, coal revenues represented 16.1% of total KCSR revenues. Substantially all coal customers are under long term contracts, which typically have an average contract term of approximately five years. KCSR’s most significant customer is Southwestern Electric Power Company (“SWEPCO”- a subsidiary of American Electric Power, Inc.), which is under contract through 2006. The Company, directly or indirectly, delivers coal to eightten electric generating plants includingin the Flint Creek, Arkansas and Welsh, Texas facilities of SWEPCO, Kansas City Power and Light plants in Kansas City and Amsterdam, Missouri, an Empire District Electric Company plant near Joplin, Missouri and an Entergy Gulfcentral United States plant in Mossville, Louisiana. KCSR transports coal that originates infrom the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and is transferred to KCSR’s rail lines at Kansas City. KCSR serves as a bridge carrier for coal deliveries to a Texas Utilities electric generating plant in Martin Lake, Texas. In addition, KCSR delivers lignite to an electric generating plant at Monticello, Texas. SWEPCO comprised approximately 61.7% of KCSR total coal revenues and 9.8% of KCS consolidated revenues in 2003.

Other

Other rail-related revenues include a variety of miscellaneous services provided to customers and interconnecting carriers and accounted for approximately 7.8% of total KCSR revenues in 2003. Major items in this category include railcar switching services, demurrage (car retention penalties) and drayage (local truck transportation services). This category also includes haulage services performed for the benefit of BNSF under an agreement that continues through 2004 and includes minimum volume commitments.

Railroad Industry

Overview

U.S. railroad companies are categorized by the STB into three types: Class I, Class II (Regional) and Class III (Local). Currently, there are seven Class I railroadsWyoming. Coal mined in the Midwest United States which can be further divided

geographically by eastern or western classification. is transported innon-unit trains to industrial consumers such as paper mills and cement companies.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The eastern railroadsCompany’s United States operations are CSX Corporationsubject to federal, state and local laws and regulations generally applicable to all businesses. Rail operations are subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board (“CSX”), Grand Trunk Corporation (which is owned by CN and includes IC and Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation – “Wisconsin Central”STB”) and Norfolk Southern. The western railroads include BNSF, KCSR, Soo Line Railroad Company (owned by Canadian Pacific Railway Company (“CP”)) and UP.

The STB and Regulation

The STB, an independent body administratively housed withinof the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”), the Federal Railroad Administration of the DOT, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), as well as other federal and state regulatory agencies. The STB has jurisdiction over disputes and complaints involving certain rates, routes and services, the sale or abandonment of rail lines, applications for line extensions and construction, and consolidation or merger with, or acquisition of control of, rail common carriers. DOT and OSHA each has jurisdiction under several federal statutes over a number of safety and health aspects of rail operations, including the transportation of hazardous materials. State agencies regulate some aspects of rail operations with respect to health and safety in areas not otherwise regulated by federal law.

KCS’ subsidiaries, as well as its competitors, are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulations. These laws cover discharges to water, air emissions, toxic substances, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and hazardous materials. These regulations have the effect of increasing the costs, risks and liabilities associated with rail operations. Environmental risks are also inherent in rail operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials.
Primary regulatory jurisdiction for the Company’s Mexican operations is overseen by the Secretary of Communications and Transportation (“SCT”). The SCT establishes regulations concerning railway safety and operations, and it is responsible for resolving disputes between railways and between railways and customers. In addition, KCSM must register its maximum rates with the economic regulation of railroads withinSCT and make regular reports to the United States. SCT on investment and traffic volumes.
The STB’s mission isMexican operations are subject to ensure that competitive, efficientMexican federal and safe transportation services are providedstate laws and regulations relating to meet the needs of shippers, receivers and consumers. The STB was created by an Act of Congress known as the ICC Termination Act of 1995 (“ICCTA”). Passageprotection of the ICCTA represented a further stepenvironment through the establishment of standards for water discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and solid waste. The Mexican government may bring administrative and criminal proceedings and impose economic sanctions against companies that violate environmental laws, and temporarily or even permanently close non-complying facilities.
Noncompliance with applicable legal provisions may result in the processimposition of streamlining and reformingfines, temporary or permanent shutdown of operations or other injunctive relief, criminal prosecution or the Federal economic regulatory oversighttermination of the railroad, truckingConcession. KCS believes that all facilities that it operates are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and bus industriesagency agreements. There are currently no material legal or administrative proceedings pending against the Company with respect to any environmental matters and management does not believe that was initiated in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. The STB is authorized tocontinued compliance with environmental laws will have three members, each with a five-year term of office. The STB Chairman is designated by the President of the United States from among the STB’s members. The STB adjudicates disputes and regulates interstate surface transportation. Railway transportation matters under the STB’s jurisdiction in general include railroad rate and service issues, rail restructuring transactions (mergers, line sales, line construction and line abandonment) and railroad labor matters.

The U.S. railroad industry was significantly deregulated with the passage of The Staggers Rail Act of 1980 (the “Staggers Act”). In enacting the Staggers Act, Congress recognized that railroads faced intense competition from trucks and other modes of transportation for most freight traffic and that prevailing regulation prevented them from earning adequate revenues and competing effectively. Through the Staggers Act, a new regulatory scheme allowing railroads to establish their own routes, tailor their rates to market conditions and differentiate rates on the basis of demand was put in place. The basic principle of the Staggers Act was that reasonable rail rates should be a function of supply and demand. The Staggers Act, among others things:

allows railroads to price competing routes and services differently to reflect relative demand;

allows railroads to enter into confidential rate and service contracts with shippers; and

abolishes collective rate making except among railroads participating in a joint-line movement.

If it is determined that a railroad is not facing enough competition to hold down prices, the STB has the authority to investigate the actions of the railroad.

The Staggers Act has had a positiveany material adverse effect on the U.S. rail industry, competition, and savings to consumers. Lower rail rates brought about byCompany’s financial condition or results of operations. KCS cannot predict the Staggers Act have resulted in significant cost savings for shippers and their customers. After decadeseffect, if any, that the adoption of steady decline, the rail market share of inter-city freight ton-miles bottomed out at 35.2% in 1978 and has trended slowly upward since then, reaching 41.7% in 2001.

Railroad Consolidation

On June 11, 2001, the STB issued new rules governing major railroad mergers and consolidations involving twoadditional or more “Class I” railroads. These rules substantially increasestringent environmental laws and regulations would have on the burden on rail merger applicants to demonstrate that a proposed transaction would be in the public interest. Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

COMPETITION
The rules require applicants to demonstrate that, among other things, a proposed transaction would enhance competition where necessary to offset negative effects of the transaction, such as competitive harm, and to address fully the impact of the transaction on transportation service.

The STB recognized, however, that a merger between KCSR and another Class I carrier would not necessarily raise the same concerns and risks as potential mergers between larger Class I railroads. Accordingly, the STB decided that for a merger proposal involving KCSR and another Class I railroad, the STB will waive the application of the new rules and apply the rules previously in effect unless it is persuaded that the new rules should apply.

Competition

The Company’s rail operations competeCompany competes against other railroads, many of which are much larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources. Since 1994, there has been significant consolidation among major North American rail carriers, including the 1995 merger of Burlington Northern, Inc. and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation (“BN/SF”, collectively “BNSF”), the 1995 merger of the UP and the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (“UP/CNW”) and the 1996 merger of UP with Southern Pacific Corporation (“UP/SP”). Further, Norfolk Southern and CSX purchased the assets of Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) in 1998 and the CN acquired the IC in June 1999. Most recently, in October 2001 CN completed its acquisition of Wisconsin Central.carriers. As a result, of this consolidation, the railroad industry is now dominated by a few “mega-carriers.” KCS management believes that its revenues were negatively affected by the UP/CNW, UP/SP and BN/SF mergers, which led to diversions of rail traffic away from KCSR’s rail lines. Management regards thevery large carriers.


5


The larger western railroads (BNSF Railway Company and UP)Union Pacific Railroad Company), in particular, asare significant competitors to the Company’s operations and prospectsKCS because of their substantial resources. The ongoing impact of these mergers is uncertain. KCS management believes however, that because of the Company’sits investments and strategic alliances it is positionedcontinue to position the Company to attract additional rail traffic through our NAFTAthroughout its rail network.

In November 2005, Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V. (“Ferromex”) acquired control of and merged with Ferrocarril del Sureste, S.A. de C.V. (“Ferrosur”), creating Mexico’s largest railway. The merger between Ferromex and Ferrosur has been declared illegal by the Mexican Antitrust Commission. Both Ferromex and Ferrosur have challenged this ruling. These merged operations are much larger than KCSM, and they serve most of the major ports and cities in Mexico and own fifty percent of FTVM, which serves all of the industries located within Mexico City.
The Company is subject to competition from motor carriers, barge lines and other maritime shipping, which compete across certain routes in its operating area.areas. Truck carriers have eroded the railroad industry’s share of total transportation revenues. Changing regulations, subsidized highway improvement programs and favorable labor regulations have improved the competitive position of trucks in the United States as an alternative mode of surface transportation for many commodities. In the United States, the trucking industry generally is more cost and transit-time competitive than railroads for short-haul distances. In addition, Mississippi and Missouri River barge traffic, among others, compete with KCSR and its rail connections in the transportation of bulk commodities such as grains, steel and petroleum products. Intermodal traffic and certain other traffic face highly price sensitive competition, particularly from motor carriers. However, rail carriers, including KCSR,KCS, have placed an emphasis on competing in the intermodal marketplace and working together with motor carriers and each other to provideend-to-end transportation of products.

While deregulation of freight rates has enhanced the ability of railroads to compete with each other and with alternative modes of transportation, this increased competition has resulted in downward pressure on freight rates. Competition with other railroads and other modes of transportation is generally based on the rates charged, the quality and reliability of the service provided and the quality of the carrier’s equipment for certain commodities.

Employees and Labor RelationsEMPLOYEES AND LABOR RELATIONS

As of December 31, 2003, KCS and its subsidiaries had approximately 2,670 employees.

Labor relations in the U.S. railroad industry are subject to extensive governmental regulation under the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”). Under the RLA, national labor agreements are renegotiated on an industry-wide scale when they become open for modification, but their terms remain in effect until new agreements are reached. Typically, neither management nor labor employees are permitted to take economic action until extended procedures are exhausted.

Approximately 84% of Previously, these negotiations have not resulted in any extended work interruptions. Under the negotiating process which began on November 1, 1999, all unions reached new labor agreements with KCSR employees are covered under variousin 2005. Various collective bargaining agreements. In 1996, nationalagreements cover 81% of KCSR’s employees.

KCSM’s labor contracts governing KCSR were negotiated withagreement covering approximately 75% of its employees was renewed in 2005 and is effective for a two-year term ending in July 2007. The compensation terms of the labor agreement are subject to renegotiation on an annual basis and all major railroad unions, including the United Transportation Union (“UTU”), the Brotherhoodother terms are renegotiated every two years. These negotiations have not resulted in any strikes, boycotts or other significant disruptions of Locomotive Engineers (“BLE”), the Transportation Communications International Union (“TCU”), the BrotherhoodKCSM’s operations.
The response to Item 101 of MaintenanceRegulation S-K under Part II Item 7 of Way Employees (“BMWE”),thisForm 10-K, and the International Associationresponses under Note 1 and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. Existing national union contracts with the railroads became amendable at the end of 1999. In August 2002, a new labor contract was reached with the UTU. The provisions ofthisForm 10-K are incorporated by reference in partial response to this agreement include the use of remote control locomotives in and around terminals and retroactive application of wage increases backItem 1. Refer to July 1, 2002. Also, a new labor contract was reached with

the TCU in 2002 and signed during 2003. A new labor contract was reached with the BMWE effective May 2001 and a formal agreement with the BLE was reached during 2003. In some cases, the wage increase elements of these new agreements have retroactive application. The provisionsItem 2, “Properties”, for further discussion of the various labor agreements generally include periodic general wage increases, lump-sum payments to workers and greater work rule flexibility, among other provisions. Additionally, these agreements include provisions that employees under these contracts make contributions to cover a portion ofCompany’s business.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION
KCS’ website (www.kcsouthern.com) provides at no cost the health and welfare costs. Currently, approximately 90% of all KCS unionized employees are governed under current contracts. Formal negotiations to enter into agreements are in progress with the remaining unions and the existing labor contracts will remain in effect until new agreements are reached. Management does not expect that the negotiations or the resulting labor agreements will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Railroad Retirement Act and Railroad Retirement Improvement Act

Railroad industry personnel are covered by the Railroad Retirement Act (“RRA”) instead of the Social Security Act. Employer contributions under the RRA are currently substantially higher than those under the Social Security Act and may rise further because of the increasing proportion of retired employees receiving benefits relative to the number of working employees. The RRA currently requires up to a 20.75% contribution by railroad employers on eligible wages while the Social Security and Medicare Acts only require a 7.65% employer contribution on similar wage bases. Railroad industry personnel are also covered by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”) rather than state workers’ compensation systems. FELA is a fault-based system with compensation for injuries settled by negotiation and litigation, which can be expensive and time-consuming. By contrast, most other industries are covered by state administered no-fault plans with standard compensation schedules. The difference in the labor regulations for the rail industry compared to the non-rail industries illustrates the competitive disadvantage placed upon the rail industry by federal labor regulations.

On December 21, 2001, the Railroad Retirement and Survivors’ Improvement Act of 2001 (“RRIA”) was signed into law. This legislation liberalizes early retirement benefits for employees with 30 years of service by reducing the full benefit age from 62 to 60, eliminates a cap on monthly retirement and disability benefits, lowers the minimum service requirement from 10 years to 5 years of service, and provides for increased benefits for surviving spouses. It also provides for the investment of railroad retirement funds in non-governmental assets, adjustments in the payroll tax rates paid by employees and employers, and the repeal of a supplemental annuity work-hour tax. The law also reduced the employer contribution for payroll taxes by 0.5% in 2002 and by an additional 1.4% in 2003. Beginning in 2004, the employer contribution will be based on a formula and could range between 8.2% and 22.1%. These reductions in the employer contributions under the RRA had a favorable impact on fringe benefits expenses during 2003. Additionally, the reduction in the retirement age from 62 to 60 is expected to result in increased employee attrition, leading to additional potential cost savings since it is not anticipated that all employees selecting early retirement will be replaced.

Insurance

KCS maintains multiple insurance programs for its various subsidiaries including rail liability and property, general liability, directors and officers’ coverage, workers compensation coverage and various specialized coverage for specific entities as needed. Coverage for KCSR is by far the most significant part of the KCS program. It includes liability coverage up to $250 million, subject to a $10 million deductible and certain aggregate limitations, and property coverage up to $200 million subject to a $5 million deductible ($10 million deductible in the event of flood or earthquake) and certain aggregate limitations. KCS management believes that the Company’s insurance program is in line with industry norms given its size and provides adequate coverage for potential losses.

Available Information

The Company’s Internet address is www.kcsi.com. Through this website, KCS makes available, free of charge, its Annual Reports onForm 10-K, Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q and Current Reports onForm 8-K,

and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing or furnishing of these reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, ethics and legal compliance policy, and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors are available on the Company’s Internet website. These guidelines, policies and charters are available in print without charge to any stockholder who requestsrequesting them. Written requests may be made to the Corporate Secretary, of KCS, P.O. Box 219335, Kansas City, Missouri 6412164121-9335 (or if by federal express or other form of express delivery to 427 West 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105).


6

Item 2.Properties


KCSR —Certain KCSR property statistics follow:

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Route miles—main and branch line

  3,108  3,109  3,103 

Total track miles

  4,351  4,359  4,444 

Miles of welded rail in service

  2,309  2,261  2,197 

Main line welded rail (%)

  61% 61% 59%

Cross ties replaced

  280,226  232,993  233,489 

Average Age(in years):


  2003

  2002

  2001

 

Wood ties in service

  16.7  16.0  16.0 

Rail in main and branch line

  31.0  29.9  28.9 

Road locomotives

  25.5  24.6  23.6 

All locomotives

  26.5  25.6  24.5 

KCSR’s fleet of locomotives and rolling stock consisted of the following at December 31:

   2003

  2002

  2001

   Leased

  Owned

  Leased

  Owned

  Leased

  Owned

Locomotives:

                  

Road Units

  302  121  302  122  304  122

Switch Units

  52  4  52  4  52  4

Other

  —    8  —    8  —    8
   
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  354  133  354  134  356  134
   
  
  
  
  
  

Rolling Stock:

                  

Box Cars

  5,252  1,354  5,358  1,366  6,164  1,420

Gondolas

  761  61  760  74  780  88

Hopper Cars

  2,746  805  2,614  966  2,002  1,179

Flat Cars (Intermodal

                  

and Other)

  1,366  552  1,599  541  1,585  601

Tank Cars

  41  40  42  40  44  43

Auto Rack

  200  —    201  —    201  —  
   
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  10,366  2,812  10,574  2,987  10,776  3,331
   
  
  
  
  
  

As of December 31, 2003, KCSR’s fleet consisted of 487 diesel locomotives, of which 133 were owned, 333 leased from Southern Capital and 21 leased from non-affiliates. KCSR’s fleet of rolling stock consisted of 13,178 freight cars, of which 2,812 were owned, 3,384 leased from Southern Capital and 6,982 leased from non-affiliates. The locomotives and freight cars leased from Southern Capital secure pass through certificates issued by Southern Capital during 2002.

The owned equipment is subject to liens created under senior secured credit facilities, as well as liens created under certain capital leases and equipment trust certificates. KCSR indebtedness with respect to equipment trust certificates and capital leases totaled approximately $19.1 million at December 31, 2003.

KCSR, in support of its transportation operations, owns and operates repair shops, depots and office buildings along its right-of-way. A major facility, the Deramus Yard, is located in Shreveport, Louisiana and includes a general office building, locomotive repair shop, car repair shops, customer service center, material warehouses and fueling facilities totaling approximately 227,000 square feet. KCSR owns a 107,800 square foot facility in Pittsburg, Kansas that previously was used as a diesel locomotive repair facility. This facility was closed during 1999 and is now being leased to an engineering and manufacturing company. KCSR also owns freight warehousing and office facilities in Dallas, Texas totaling approximately 150,000 square feet. Other facilities owned by KCSR include a 21,000 square foot freight car repair shop in Kansas City, Missouri and approximately 15,000 square feet of office space in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. KCSR also has the support of a locomotive repair facility in Kansas City. This facility is owned and operated by General Electric Company (“GE”) and is used to maintain and repair AC 4400 locomotives that were manufactured by GE and are leased by KCSR.

In June 2001, the Company entered into a 17-year lease agreement for a new corporate headquarters building in downtown Kansas City, Missouri. In April 2002, the Company moved its corporate offices into this building. The Company’s corporate offices had previously been located in another building in downtown Kansas City, which was leased from a subsidiary of the Company until the building was sold in June 2001.

KCSR owns six intermodal facilities and has contracted with third parties to operate these facilities. These facilities are located in Dallas; Kansas City; Shreveport and New Orleans, Louisiana; Jackson, Mississippi; and Salisaw, Oklahoma. During 2003, the Company expanded the capacity of its Dallas and Shreveport facilities through capital improvements. The Company has constructed an automobile facility and has plans to construct an intermodal facility at the former Richards-Gebaur Airbase in Kansas City, Missouri. A portion of the automotive facility became operational in April 2000 for the storage and movement of automobiles. Intermodal and automotive operations at the facility may be further expanded in the future as business opportunities arise. The various intermodal facilities include strip tracks, cranes and other equipment used in facilitating the transfer and movement of trailers and containers.

KCSR also has ten bulk transload facilities, including facilities in Kansas City; Spiro, Oklahoma; Jackson; Dallas; Sauget, Illinois; Lake Charles and Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Vicksburg, Mississippi; and Pittsburg and Port Arthur, Texas. Due to growth in transload traffic, KCSR expanded its Jackson facility in 2003. In 2003, KCSR opened the transload facility in Pittsburg and returned to service a 70-acre bulk commodity handling facility in Port Arthur. Transload operations consist of rail/truck shipments whereby the products shipped are unloaded from the trailer, container or rail car and reloaded onto the other mode of transportation. Transload is similar to intermodal, except that intermodal shipments transfer the entire container or trailer and transload shipments transfer only the product being shipped.

KCSR owns 16.6% of the Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, which owns and operates approximately 80 miles of track, and operates an additional eight miles of track under trackage rights in greater Kansas City, Missouri. KCSR also leases for operating purposes certain short sections of trackage owned by various other railroad companies and jointly owns certain other facilities with these railroads.

Grupo TFM

TFM operates approximately 2,650 miles of main and branch lines and certain additional sidings, spur tracks and main line under trackage rights. TFM has the right to operate the rail lines, but does not own the land, roadway or associated structures. Approximately 81% of the main line operated by TFM consists of continuously

welded rail. As of December 31, 2003, TFM owned 467 locomotives, owned or leased from affiliates 4,293 freight cars and leased from non-affiliates 150 locomotives and 7,683 freight cars. Grupo TFM (through TFM) has office space at which various operational, administrative, managerial and other activities are performed. The primary facilities are located in Mexico City and Monterrey, Mexico. TFM leases 94,915 square feet of office space in Mexico City and holds, under the Concession, a 115,157 square foot facility in Monterrey.

Panama Canal Railway Company

PCRC leases four locomotives and owns two locomotives. PCRC also owns 12 double stack cars, 6 passenger cars and various other infrastructure improvements and equipment. Under the concession, PCRC constructed and operates intermodal terminal facilities at each end of its railroad and an approximate 15,000 square foot equipment maintenance facility. All of this property and equipment is subject to liens securing PCRC debt as further described in Item 1, “Business—Rail Network—Significant Investments—Panama Canal Railway Company.”

Other

The Company owns 1,025 acres of property located on the waterfront in the Port Arthur, Texas area, which includes 22,000 linear feet of deep-water frontage and three docks. Port Arthur is an uncongested port with direct access to the Gulf of Mexico. Approximately 75% of this property is available for development.

Trans-Serve, Inc. operates a railroad wood tie treating plant in Vivian, Louisiana under an industrial revenue bond lease arrangement with an option to purchase. This facility includes buildings totaling approximately 12,000 square feet.

Pabtex GP LLP owns a 70-acre bulk commodity handling facility in Port Arthur, Texas.

KCSR owns a microwave system formerly owned and operated by Mid-South Microwave, Inc. prior to its merger into KCSR effective December 31, 2002. This system extends essentially along the right-of-way of KCSR from Kansas City to Dallas, Beaumont and Port Arthur and New Orleans.

Other subsidiaries of the Company own approximately 5,500 acres of land at various points adjacent to the KCSR right-of-way. Other properties owned include a 354,000 square foot warehouse at Shreveport and several former railway buildings now being rented to non-affiliated companies, primarily as warehouse space.

In the opinion of management, the various facilities, office space and other properties owned and/or leased by the Company and its subsidiaries are adequate for current operating needs.

The information set forth in response to Item 102 of Regulation S-K under Item 1, “Business”, of this Form 10-K and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” is incorporated by reference in partial response to this Item 2.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

The information set forth in response to Item 103 of Regulation S-K under Part II Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Other—Litigation—Other— Environmental Matters and—Recent Developments—Dispute over Acquisition Agreement” of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in response to this Item 3. In addition, see the discussion in Part II Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 9—Commitments and Contingencies” of this Form 10-K.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three-month period ended December 31, 2003.

Executive Officers of the Company

All executive officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. All of the executive officers have employment agreements with the Company.

Item 1A.Risk Factors
Risks Related to an Investment in KCS’ Common Stock
The price of KCS’ common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for investors to resell common stock when they want to or at prices they find attractive.
The price of KCS’ common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) constantly changes. The Company expects that the market price of its common stock will continue to fluctuate.
The Company’s stock price can fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond KCS’ control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

Name


• quarterly variations in operating results;
 Age

• 
operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts, ratings agencies and investors;
 

Position(s)


• 
changes in expectations as to future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts, ratings agencies and investors;

Michael R. Haverty

 59• developments generally affecting the railroad industry;
 Chairman• announcements by KCS or its competitors of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officersignificant contracts, acquisitions, joint marketing relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

Gerald K. Davies

 59• the assertion or resolution of significant claims or proceedings against KCS;
 Executive Vice President• KCS’ dividend policy and Chief Operating Officerrestrictions on the payment of dividends;

Ronald G. Russ

 49• future sales of KCS’ equity or equity-linked securities;
 Executive Vice President• the issuance of common stock in payment of dividends on preferred stock or upon conversion of preferred stock; and Chief Financial Officer

Jerry W. Heavin

 52• Senior Vice President—Operations of KCSR

Larry O. Stevenson

40Senior Vice President—Salesgeneral domestic and Marketing of KCSR

Warren K. Erdman

45Vice President—Corporate Affairs

Paul J. Weyandt

51Vice President and Treasurer

Mark W. Osterberg

53Vice President and Comptroller

Jay M. Nadlman

43Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretaryinternational economic conditions.

The information set forth

In addition, from time to time the stock market in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in the description of The Board of Directors—Directors Serving Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2006 with respect to Mr. Haverty is incorporated herein by reference.

Gerald K. Daviesgeneral has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of KCS since July 18, 2000. Mr. Davies joined KCSR in January 1999 as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Daviesexperienced extreme volatility that has served as a director of KCSR since November 1999. Prior to joining KCSR, Mr. Davies served as the Executive Vice President of Marketing with Canadian National Railway from 1993 through 1998. Mr. Davies held senior management positions with Burlington Northern Railway from 1976 to 1984 and 1991 to 1993, respectively, and with CSX Transportation from 1984 to 1991.

Ronald G. Russ has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 16, 2003. Mr. Russ served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 1, 2002 to January 15, 2003. Mr. Russ served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Central from 1999 to 2002. He served as Treasurer of Wisconsin Central from 1987 to 1993. From 1993 to 1999 he was Executive Manager and Chief Financial Officer for Tranz Rail Holdings Limited, an affiliate of Wisconsin Central in Wellington, New Zealand. He also served in various capacities with Soo Line Railroad and The Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, spanning a 26-year career in the railroad industry.

Jerry W. Heavin has served as Senior Vice President of Operations and a director of KCSR since July 9, 2002. Mr. Heavin joined KCSR on September 1, 2001 and served as Vice President of Engineering of KCSR until July 8, 2002. Prior to joining KCSR, Mr. Heavin served as an independent engineering consultant from 1997 through August 2001. Mr. Heavin began his railroad career in 1970 with UP, serving in various capacities, including general superintendent transportation and chief engineer of facilities.

Larry O. Stevenson has served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales of KCSR since January 1, 2003. Mr. Stevenson served as Vice President—Paper and Forest Products of KCSR from September 1, 2000 to December 31, 2002 and General Director Customer Service of KCSR from February 14, 2000 to August 31, 2000. Prior to joining KCSR, Mr. Stevenson served in various capacities at Canadian National Railway from June 1983 to December 1999, most recently as Assistant Vice President of Sales.

Warren K. Erdman has served as Vice President—Corporate Affairs of KCS since April 15, 1997 and as Vice President—Corporate Affairs of KCSR since May 1997. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Erdman served as Chief of Staff to United States Senator Kit Bond of Missouri from 1987 to 1997.

Paul J. Weyandt has served as Vice President and Treasurer of KCS and of KCSR since September 2001. Before joining KCS, Mr. Weyandt was a consultantoften been unrelated to the Structured Finance Groupoperating performance of GE Capital Corporation from May 2001a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of KCS’ common stock.

KCS’ ability to September 2001. Prior to consulting, Mr. Weyandt spent 23 years with BNSF, most recently as Assistant Vice President—Financepay dividends on its common stock is currently restricted, and Assistant Treasurer.

Mark W. Osterberg has served as Vice President and Comptroller of KCS and KCSR since February 2004. Mr. Osterberg was a financial and business process consultant in 2002 and 2003. He was the Chief Financial Officer of Sun Country Airlines, Inc. from April 2000 to December 2001. Sun Country entered US bankruptcy proceeding in January 2002 and its trade name and selected assets were sold to a third party in 2002. Mr. Osterberg served as Chief Financial Officer of Norton Motorcycles Inc., a development stage enterprise, and its predecessor from December 1998 to February 2000. Prior to that he served as the Vice President—Chief Accounting Officer for Northwest Airlines Corporation for seven years. Mr. Osterberg was also employed by the Deloitte Haskins & Sells (now Deloitte) auditing firm for nine years.

Jay M. Nadlman has served as Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of KCS since April 1, 2001. Mr. Nadlman joined KCS in December 1991 as a General Attorney, and was promoted to Assistant General Counsel in 1997, serving in that capacity until April 1, 2001. Mr. Nadlman has served as Associate General Counsel and Secretary of KCSR since May 3, 2001 and as Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from August 1997 to May 3, 2001. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Nadlman served as an attorney with the Union Pacific Railroad Company from 1985 to 1991.

There are no arrangements or understandings between the executive officers and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was or is to be selected as an officer of KCS, except with respect to the executive officers who have entered into employment agreements. These employment agreements designate the position(s) to be held by the executive officer.

None of the above officers are related to one another by family.

Part II

Item 5.Market for the Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The information set forth in response to Item 201 of Regulation S-K on the cover (page i) under the heading “Company Stock,” and in Part II Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, at Note 11—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in partial response to this Item 5.

The Company hasdoes not declared anyanticipate paying cash dividends on its common stock duringin the last two fiscal yearsforeseeable future.

KCS has agreed, and may agree in the future, to restrictions on its ability to pay dividends on its common stock. In addition, to maintain its credit ratings, the Company may be limited in its ability to pay dividends on its common stock so that it can maintain an appropriate level of debt. During the first quarter of 2000, the board of directors suspended common stock dividends. KCS does not anticipate making any cash dividend payments to its common stockholders infor the foreseeable future. Pursuant
Holders of the Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock may have special voting rights if KCS fails to pay dividends on that preferred stock over a stated number of quarters.
Because of certain restrictions in the Company’s amended and restated credit agreement,indentures governing notes issued by KCSR, KCS did not pay dividends on its Series C Preferred Stock or Series D Preferred Stock commencing on May 15, 2006, for the Company is prohibited from the paymentfirst quarter of cash2006 until those dividend arrearages were made up in February 2007. If dividends on the Company’s common stock.

On May 5, 2003, the Company completed the sale of $200 million (400,000 shares) of 4.25% Redeemable Cumulative Convertible PerpetualSeries C Preferred Stock or Series C (“Convertible Preferred Stock”), with a liquidation preference of $500 per share in a private offering under Rule 144A to qualified institutional buyers. Net proceeds to the Company were $193 million after fees to the initial purchasers of $7 million and other expenses of the offering. Dividends on the ConvertibleD Preferred Stock will be cumulative and will be payable quarterly atare in arrears for six consecutive quarters (or an annual rateequivalent number of 4.25% ofdays in the liquidation preference, when, as and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. Accumulated unpaid dividends will cumulate dividends at the same rate as dividends cumulate on the Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of the Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible, under certain conditions, and subject to adjustment under certain conditions, into 33.4728 shares of the Company’s common stock. Conversion rights arise only upon the occurrence of the following: (i) the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock exceeds a specified level for a specified period; (ii) upon certain credit rating downgrades; (iii) upon the convertible preferred stock trading below a certain level for a specified period; (iv) upon notice of redemption; and (v) upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions. Onaggregate, whether or after May 20, 2008, the Company will have the option to redeem any or all of the Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to certain conditions. Under certain circumstances, at the option of thenot consecutive) holders of the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock the Company mayor Series D Preferred Stock, as applicable, will be requiredentitled to purchase shareselect two of the Convertibleauthorized number of directors at the next annual stockholders’ meeting at which directors are elected and at each subsequent stockholders’ meeting until such time as all accumulated dividends are paid on the Series C Preferred Stock from the holders. A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Convertibleor


7


Series D Preferred Stock, has been used to reduce debt. The remainder of the net proceeds from the sale of the Convertible Preferred Stock are expected to be used to pay a portion of the purchase priceas applicable, or set aside for the proposed acquisition of a controlling interest of Grupo TFM (See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments—Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM”) or to further reduce debt.

On August, 1, 2003, KCS filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement with the SEC to register, for resale by the holders, the Convertible Preferred Stock and the common stock into which such preferred stock may be converted. On October 24, 2003, this Registration Statement, as amended, was declared effective by the SEC. KCS has filed, and will continue to file, post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement as required by applicable rules and regulations.payment. In addition, KCS will not receive any proceeds from the salebe eligible to register future offerings of securities onForm S-3 or to avail itself of the securitiesother benefits available to companies that qualify as “well-known seasoned issuers” under this Registration Statement,SEC rules if KCS fails to pay dividends on its preferred stock. This could adversely affect KCS’ ability to access capital markets, and increase the cost of accessing capital markets, until the Company qualifies as amended.

Asa “well-known seasoned issuer.”

Sales of February 27, 2004, there were 5,316 record holderssubstantial amounts of the Company’s common stock.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included under Item 7 of this Form 10-K and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, and the Reports of Independent Accountants thereon, included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K and such data is qualified by reference thereto. All years reflect the 1-for-2 reverseKCS’ common stock split to shareholders of record on June 28, 2000 paid July 12, 2000.

   2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

  1999

   (in millions, except per share and ratio amounts)

Revenues

  $581.3  $566.2  $583.2  $578.7  $609.0

Equity in net earnings from unconsolidated affiliates—continuing operations

  $11.0  $43.4  $27.1  $22.1  $5.2

Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change (a)

  $3.3  $57.2  $31.1  $16.7  $10.2

Earnings per common share—Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change (a)

                    

Basic

  $(0.04) $0.94  $0.53  $0.29  $0.18

Diluted

   (0.04)  0.91   0.51   0.28   0.17

Total assets ( b)

  $2,152.9  $2,008.8  $2,010.9  $1,944.5  $2,672.0

Long-term obligations

  $523.4  $582.6  $658.4  $674.6  $760.9

Cash dividends per common share

  $—    $—    $—    $—    $0.32

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (c)

   —  (d)  1.3x   1.1x   1.0x   1.2x

(a)Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 include certain unusual operating expenses and other income as further described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—“Results of Operations.” These costs include charges for casualty claims, cost related to the implementation of the Management Control System (“MCS”), benefits received from the settlement of certain legal and insurance claims, severance costs and expenses associated with legal verdicts against the Company, gains recorded on the sale of operating property, among others. Other non-operating income includes gains recorded on sale of non-operating properties and investments. For the year ended December 31, 1999, income from continuing operations includes unusual costs and expenses related to facility and project closures, employee separations and related costs, labor and personal injury related issues.
(b)The total assets presented herein as of December 31, 1999 include the net assets of Stilwell Financial Inc. (“Stilwell”, now Janus Capital Group Inc.) of $814.6 million. Due to the Spin-off on July 12, 2000, the total assets for the other periods presented do not include the net assets of Stilwell.
(c)The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose “earnings” represent the sum of (i) pretax income from continuing operations adjusted for income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates, (ii) fixed charges, (iii) distributed income from unconsolidated affiliates and (iv) amortization of capitalized interest, less capitalized interest. “Fixed charges” represent the sum of (i) interest expensed, (ii) capitalized interest, (iii) amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and (iv) one-third of our annual rental expense, which management believes is representative of the interest component of rental expense.
(d)For the year ended December 31, 2003, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was less than 1:1. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 1:1 if a deficiency of $18.2 million was eliminated.

The information set forth in response to Item 301 of Regulation S-K under Part II Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in partial response to this Item 6.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion is intended to clarify and focus on the Company’s results of operations, certain changes in its financial position, liquidity, capital structure and business developments forpublic market could adversely affect the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements, the related notes and the Report of Independent Accountants thereon, and other information included in this report.

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

KCS, a Delaware corporation, is a holding company with principal operations in rail transportation and its principal subsidiaries and affiliates include the following:

The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary;

Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo TFM”), a 46.6% owned unconsolidated affiliate, which owns 80% of the stock of TFM, S.A. de C.V. (“TFM”). TFM wholly owns Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”). Mexrail owns 100% of The Texas-Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”);

Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (“Southern Capital”), a 50% owned unconsolidated affiliate that leases locomotive and rail equipment to KCSR;

Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), an unconsolidated affiliate of which KCSR owns 50%prevailing market price of the common stock. PCRC owns all
As of December 31, 2006, there were 10,607,068 shares of common stock issued or reserved for issuance under the 1991 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2,061,234 shares of common stock held by executive officers and directors outside those plans, and 20,389,113 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock. Sales of common stock by employees upon exercise of Panarail Tourism Company (“Panarail”).their options, sales by executive officers and directors subject to compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act, and sales of common stock that may be issued upon conversion of the outstanding preferred stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect the market price of KCS’ common stock.

KCS was organizedhas provisions in 1962 as Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.its charter, bylaws and Rights Agreement that could deter, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring KCS and that could deprive an investor of an opportunity to obtain a takeover premium for shares of KCS’ common stock.
KCS has provisions in 2002 formally changed its namecharter and bylaws that may delay or prevent unsolicited takeover bids from third parties. These provisions may deprive KCS’ stockholders of an opportunity to Kansas City Southern. KCS, assell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices. For example, the holding company, supplies its various subsidiaries with managerial, legal, tax, financial and accounting services, in additionrestated certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board of directors. It further provides that the vote of 70% of the shares entitled to managing other minor “non-operating” investments.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview

KCS operates under one reportable business segmentvote in the rail transportation industryelection of directors is required to amend the restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of directors to more than eighteen, abolish cumulative voting for directors and KCSR,abolish the Company’s principal subsidiary, is the smallestclassification of the Class I railroads.board. The Company generates its revenues and cash flowssame vote requirement is imposed by providing its customersthe restated certificate of incorporation on certain transactions involving mergers, consolidations, sales or leases of assets with freight delivery services in both our regional area and throughout the United States, Mexico and Canada through connections with our affiliates and other Class I rail carriers. Our customers conduct business in a numberor to certain owners of different industries, including electric-generating utilities, chemical and petroleum products, paper and forest products, agriculture and mineral products, automotive products and intermodal traffic. The Company uses its cash flowsmore than 5% of KCS’ outstanding stock entitled to support its operations and to invest in its infrastructure. The rail industry is a capital-intensive industry and the Company’s capital expenditures are a significant use of cash each year. In 2003, the Company’s capital expenditures were approximately $79 million and are projected to be $108 million in 2004. A more detailed discussion of capital expenditures is foundvote in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section below.

Grupo TFM is an unconsolidated affiliate andelection of directors. The bylaws provide that a stockholder must give the Company uses the equity accounting methodadvance written notice of its intent to recognize its proportionate share of Grupo TFM’s earnings. TFM operatesnominate a strategically significant rail corridor between Mexico and the United States. KCS management believes that its investment in Grupo TFM isdirector or raise a strategic asset with substantial economic potential.

As further described below in “Recent Developments,” on April 20, 2003,matter at an annual meeting. In addition, the Company reached an agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) with its partner, Grupo TMM, S.A. (“Grupo TMM”) and otherhas adopted a Rights Agreement which under certain circumstances would significantly impair the ability of third parties to ultimately acquire control of TFM through the purchase of Grupo TMM’s shares of Grupo TFM (the “Acquisition”). However, Grupo TMM has advised the Company that it is unwilling to proceed with the Acquisition. The dispute over Grupo TMM’s unwillingness to proceed with the Acquisition is currently the subject of binding arbitration and the Company’s management cannot predict whether or not KCS will be able to complete the Acquisition. Additionally, there are several other uncertainties with respect to the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM as described further in “Recent Developments.” The Company is spending substantial time and financial resources to address these uncertainties as well as the disputed Acquisition and the ultimate resolution of these items could have a material affect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

2003 Analysis

In 2003, the Company experienced consolidated revenue growth of approximately 3% compared to 2002 resulting from volume growth, targeted rate increases and improved operating performance at KCSR due to the efficiencies gained as a resultwithout prior approval of the implementationboard of a newdirectors.

Risks Related to KCS’ Business
KCS competes against other railroads and other transportation operating platform, Management Control System (“MCS”), in July 2002. Revenue increases were notable in paper and forest products, agriculture and minerals, intermodal traffic and certain chemical products as KCSR began to realize the benefit of a slight economic recovery during the latter part of 2003. KCSR also improved its operating performance during 2003, which was evident in key performance measurements such as reduced terminal dwell time, higher train speeds and lower average daily crew starts. Even with the increased traffic volumes and revenue growth, compensation and benefits expense was unchanged in 2003 compared to 2002 and car hire expense declined 49% year over year, both resulting from improvements in operating performance and demonstrating the impact of efficiencies gained from a more fully functional MCS. The contribution of these operating improvements to operating expenses, however, was offset by higher personal injury costs, which resulted in a $31.2 million increase in casualties and insurance expense, as well as higher fuel prices throughout 2003, which led to a $9.0 million increase in fuel costs year over year. Depreciation expense also increased $2.9 million in 2003 due to a full year of depreciation on MCS versus only a half year in 2002. These factors were the primary contributors to a $34.0 million increase in operating expenses in 2003 compared to 2002 and an $18.9 million decline in operating income.

providers.

The Company’s equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates decreased in 2003 compared to 2002, as a result of a $33.5 million reduction in equity in earnings from Grupo TFM. The Company’s equity in earnings from Grupo TFM were adversely affected by lower operating income, higher interest expensedomestic and a decline in the deferred tax benefit at Grupo TFM. In 2003, Grupo TFM’s overall freight volumes increased 3.3% compared to 2002. Freight revenues, however declined $13.6 million year over year, driven by the devaluation of the peso, which reduced revenues by approximately $34 million. In 2003, approximately 59.7% of Grupo TFM’s revenues were denominated in United States dollars. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2003, Grupo TFM’s results include a deferred tax benefit of $51.5 million (calculated under U.S. GAAP) compared to a deferred tax benefit of $91.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, resulting in an approximate $15.2 million reduction in the equity in net earnings recorded by the Company related to its proportionate ownership of Grupo TFM. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company’s equity in earnings from Grupo TFM were favorably impacted by the increase in ownership percentage arising from the purchase, by TFM, of the Mexican government’s 24.6% ownership of Grupo TFM during the second quarter of 2002.

2004 Outlook

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Information” for cautionary statements concerning forward-looking comments.

During 2004, KCSR expects to continue to take advantage of the economic recovery and focus on improving the Company’s domestic operations. Management expects overall KCSR revenues to increase in 2004 compared to 2003 as certain commodity segmentsinternational operations are expected to experience growth based on higher demand. Except as discussed herein, assuming normalized rail operations, management expects KCSR’s variable operating expenses to be proportionate with revenue activity with cost efficiencies expected as a result of the continued improvements realized from the utilization of MCS. Fuel prices will fluctuate subject to market conditions, which, in 2003, were substantially higher than in 2002. Management is concerned about the trend of fuel prices due to uncertainty in the foreign markets and, as a result, the Company participates in derivative contracts to mitigate these market risks. KCSR currently has approximately 13% of its budgeted fuel usage for 2004 hedged through purchase commitments and fuel swaps, both of which reduce the risk of the adverse impact of volatile fuel prices. Additionally, in 2004, KCSR will begin purchasing a significant portion of its fuel through a pipeline system. The use of this pipeline is expected to result in fuel cost savings during 2004. Insurance costs are expected to rise commensurate with market conditions.

During 2003, KCS retained the services of an international consulting engineering firm to undertake a depreciation study of the Company’s property, plant and equipment. This study, the results of which have been approved by the STB, indicates that, beginning in 2004, annual depreciation expense for KCSR will be reduced by approximately $13 million.

The Company is currently in the process of refinancing its existing senior secured credit facility as further described in “Recent Developments—Refinancing of Senior Secured Credit Facility.” KCS has received firm commitment letters from various banks and institutional investors committing to fully fund the new facility and KCS management expects to close this refinancing transaction prior to March 31, 2004. If, however, this transaction is not consummated on or prior to March 31, 2004, the Company may be in technical default of certain of its financial covenants under its existing credit facility.

The Company expects to participate in the earnings/losses from its equity investments in Grupo TFM, Southern Capital and PCRC. Due to the variability of factors affecting the Mexican economy, management can make no assurances as to the impact that a change in the value of the Mexican peso or a change in Mexican inflation will have on the results of Grupo TFM. In addition, if a resolution is reached regarding the dispute over the agreement to acquire Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM and the transaction to place KCSR, TFM and Tex-Mex under common control is consummated, then the Company would report the results of operations of TFM and Tex-Mex as consolidated subsidiaries (See “Recent Developments—Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM from Grupo TMM”).

RISK FACTORS

The Company Faces Competition from Other Railroads and Other Transportation Providers. The Company is subject to competition from other railroads, manyin particular the Union Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”) and BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) in the United States and Ferromex in Mexico. Many of whichKCS’ rail competitors are much larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources.resources than KCS. In addition, the Company is subject to competition from truck carriers and from barge lines and other maritime shipping. Increased competition has resultedcould result in downward pressure on freight rates. Competition with other railroads and other modes of transportation is generally based on the rates charged, the quality and reliability of the service provided and the quality of the carrier’s equipment for certain commodities. While the CompanyKCS must build or acquire and maintain its infrastructure, truck carriers, and maritime shippers and barges are able to use publicrights-of-way. The trucking industry has in the past provided effective rate and service competition to the railroad industry. Trucking requires substantially smaller capital investment and maintenance expenditures than railroads and allows for more frequent and flexible scheduling. Continuing competitive pressures, and decliningany reduction in margins due to competitive pressures, future improvements that increase the quality of alternative modes of transportation in the locations in which the Company operates, or legislation or regulations that providesprovide motor carriers with additional advantages,


8


such as increased size of vehicles and lessreduced weight restrictions, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

The Company may be required

A material part of KCS’ growth strategy is based upon the conversion of truck traffic to make additional investments in TFM. The Mexican government has put rights with respect to the shares of TFM it holds to compel the purchase of those shares by Grupo TFM. The Mexican government provided Grupo TFM with notice of its intention to sell its interest in TFM. Grupo TFM has responded to the Mexican government’s notice reaffirming its right and interest in purchasing the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM, but also advising the Mexican government that it would not take any action until its lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment was resolved. Grupo TFM filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment concerning its interpretation of its obligation to purchase the Mexican government’s shares of TFM, and that lawsuit is ongoing. KCS and Grupo TMM have been made parties to the lawsuit. In the event that Grupo TFM does not purchase the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM and Grupo TFM’s lawsuit is resolved in favor of Mexican government, then Grupo TMM and KCS, or either of Grupo TMM or KCS alone, would, following notification by the Mexican government in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements, be obligated to purchase the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM. If the Acquisition is completed prior to the purchase of the Mexican government’s interest in TFM, KCS will be solely responsible for purchasing the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM. If KCS had been required to purchase this interest as of December 31, 2003, the total purchase price would have been approximately $467.7 million. Based upon public disclosures made by Grupo TMM, it is not in a position to make this purchase.

The Company may be unable to complete the Acquisition. KCS and Grupo TMM are currently in a dispute over the Acquisition Agreement. KCS has initiated binding arbitration with respect to the dispute and has filed pleadings and obtained rulings from the Delaware Court of Chancery to preserve the parties’ positions pending resolution of the dispute. However, thererail. There can be no assurance that the partiesCompany will resolve their disputes relatinghave the ability to the Acquisition Agreement,convert traffic from truck to rail transport or that the arbitratorscustomers already converted will be retained. If the railroad industry in general, and the Mexican operations in particular, are unable to preserve their competitive advantages vis-à-vis the trucking industry, projected revenue growth from the Mexican operations could be adversely affected. Additionally, the revenue growth attributable to the Mexican operations could be affected by, among other factors, KCS’ inability to grow its existing customer base, negative macroeconomic developments impacting the United States or Mexican economies, and failure to capture additional cargo transport market share from the courts will resolveshipping industry and other railroads.

NAFTA called for Mexican trucks to have unrestricted access to highways in United States border states by 1995 and full access to all United States highways by January 2000. However, the disputes,United States did not follow that timetable because of concerns over Mexico’s trucking safety standards. In February 2001, a NAFTA tribunal ruled in favor of KCS. The American Arbitration Association International Center for Dispute Resolution hearing the disputean arbitration between the CompanyUnited States and Grupo TMM issued its interim award on March 19, 2004 findingMexico that the Acquisition Agreement remainsUnited States must allow Mexican trucks to cross the border and operate on United States highways. On March 14, 2002, as part of its agreement under NAFTA, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued safety rules that allow Mexican truckers to apply for operating authority to transport goods beyond the20-mile commercial zones along the United States-Mexico border. These safety rules require Mexican motor carriers seeking to operate in forcethe United States to, among other things, pass safety inspections, obtain valid insurance with a United States registered insurance company, conduct alcohol and is binding on KCSdrug testing for drivers and Grupo TMMobtain a U.S. Department of Transportation identification number. Under the rules issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation, it was expected that the border would have been opened to Mexican motor carriers in accordance with its terms. KCS and Grupo TMM will now move on to the second phase of the arbitration, which will decide the remaining issues, including remedies and damages. Even if disputes relating to the Acquisition Agreement are resolved2002. However, in favor of KCS, the consummation of the Acquisition is subjectJanuary 2003, in response to a numberlawsuit filed in May 2002 by a coalition of conditions.environmental, consumer and labor groups, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling which held that the rules issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation violated federal environmental laws because the Department of Transportation failed to adequately review the impact on United States air quality of rules allowing Mexican carriers to transport beyond the20-mile commercial zones along the United States-Mexico border. The Court of Appeals ruling required the Department of Transportation to provide an Environmental Impact Statement on the Mexican truck plan and to certify compliance with the United States Clean Air Act. The Department of Transportation requested the United States Supreme Court to review the Court of Appeals ruling and, on December 15, 2003, the Supreme Court granted the Department of Transportation’s request. On June 7, 2004, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Court of Appeals ruling. Although the Department of Transportation is no longer required to provide an Environmental Impact Statement under the Supreme Court’s ruling, the United States and Mexico must still complete negotiations on safety inspections before the border is opened. KCS cannot predict when these negotiations will be completed. There can be no assurance that truck transport between Mexico and the United States will not increase substantially in the future if the United States and Mexico complete the negotiations and the border is opened. Any such increase in truck traffic could affect KCS’ ability to continue converting traffic to rail from truck transport because it may result in an expansion in the availability, or an improvement in the quality, of the trucking services offered by Mexican carriers.
Through KCSM’s Concession from the Mexican government, the Company has the right to control and operate the southern half of the rail-bridge at Laredo, Texas. Under the Concession, KCSM must grant to Ferromex the right to operate over a north-south portion of KCSM’s rail lines between Ramos Arizpe near Monterrey and the city of Queretaro that constitutes over 600 kilometers (360 miles) of KCSM’s main track. Using these trackage rights, Ferromex may be able to compete with KCSM over KCSM’s rail lines for traffic between Mexico City and the United States. The Concession also requires KCSM to grant rights to use certain portions of its tracks to Ferrosur and the “belt railroad” operated in the greater Mexico City area by FTVM, thereby providing Ferrosur with more efficient access to certain Mexico City industries. As a result of having to grant trackage rights to other railroads, KCSM loses the capacity of using a portion of its tracks at all times.


9


Ferromex, the operator of the largest railway system in Mexico, is in close proximity to KCSM’s rail lines. In particular, KCSM has experienced and continues to experience competition from Ferromex with respect to the transport of a variety of products. The rail lines operated by Ferromex run from Guadalajara and Mexico City to four United States border crossings west of the Nuevo Laredo-Laredo crossing, providing an alternative to KCSM’s routes for the transport of freight from those cities to the United States border. In addition, Ferromex directly competes with KCSM in some areas of its service territory, including Tampico, Saltillo, Monterrey and Mexico City. Ferrosur competes directly with KCSM for traffic to and from southeastern Mexico. Ferrosur, like KCSM, also services Mexico City and Puebla.
In November 2005, Grupo México, the controlling shareholder of Ferromex, acquired all of the conditionsshares of Ferrosur. The common control of Ferromex and Ferrosur would give Grupo México control over a nationwide railway system in Mexico and ownership of 50% of the shares of FTVM. The merger between Ferromex and Ferrosur has been declared illegal by the Mexican Antitrust Commission. Both Ferromex and Ferrosur have challenged this ruling. There can be no assurance as to the Acquisitionwhether Grupo México will be satisfied.successful in challenging this ruling. If Grupo México is successful in its appeal, KCSM’s competitive position may be harmed.
On August 3, 2006, the AcquisitionMexican Antitrust Commission announced an investigation into possible antitrust practices in the provision of rail cargo services. The targets of that investigation have not been identified, and while KCSM may be required to provide information in connection with the investigation, the Company does not believe KCSM’s operations are the subject of the inquiry, although there can be no assurance KCSM is not consummated, the valueor would not become a subject of the Company’s investmentinquiry.
Rate reductions by competitors could make KCS’ freight services less competitive, and KCS cannot assure that it would always be able to match these rate reductions. In recent years, KCS has experienced aggressive price competition from Ferromex in Grupo TFM may become impaired.

Iffreight rates for agricultural products, which has adversely affected results of operations. KCS’ ability to respond to competitive pressures by decreasing rates without adversely affecting gross margins and operating results will depend on, among other things, the Mexican government’s preliminary findingsability to reduce operating costs. KCS’ failure to respond to competitive pressures, and conclusions arising from its tax audit of TFM’s 1997 tax returns are sustained, itparticularly rate competition, in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operationscondition.

In recent years, there has also been significant consolidation among major North American rail carriers. The resulting merged railroads could attempt to use their size and business of TFM. As a result, the value of the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM couldpricing power to block other railroads’ access to efficient gateways and routing options that are currently and have been historically available. There can be materially adversely affected. On January 19, 2004, TFM received a Special Certificate from the Mexican Federal Treasuryno assurance that further consolidation in the amount of 2.1 billion pesos (the same amount as the value added tax (“VAT”) refund claimed by TFM in 1997). On January 20, 2004, TFM was served with an official letter notifying TFM of the Mexican government’s preliminary findings and conclusions arising from its tax audit of TFM’s 1997 tax returns (the “Tax Audit Summary”). In the Tax Audit Summary, the Mexican government notified TFM of its preliminary conclusion that the documentation provided by TFM in support of the VAT refund credit shown on the 1997 tax return and TFM’s basisrailroad industry, whether in the Concession title, locomotives and rail equipment, and capital leases purchased by TFM’s predecessor in interest prior to Grupo TFM’s purchase of 80% of the shares of TFM, doUnited States or Mexico, will not comply with the formalities required by the applicable tax legislation. If sustained, the conclusions of the Tax Audit Summary would prevent TFM from depreciating the Concession title, locomotives and rail equipment, and capital leases that represent the majority of the value of the assets owned by TFM. The Tax Audit Summary also attached the Special Certificate pending resolution of the audit, as a potential asset to be used to satisfy any tax obligations owed by TFM as a result of the audit. If TFM is unable to depreciate the Concession title and the other assets reported on its 1997 tax return, this could have a materialan adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations and business of TFM. As a result, the value of the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM could be materially adversely affected. See “Recent Developments—Value Added Tax (“VAT”) Lawsuit and VAT Contingency Payment under the Acquisition Agreement” below.

operations.

The Company’sKCS’ business strategy, operations and growth rely significantly on joint venturesagreements with other railroads and other strategic alliances.third parties.
Operation of the Company’sKCS’ integrated rail network and the Company’sits plans for growth and expansion rely significantly on agreements with other railroads and third parties, including joint ventures and other strategic alliances. Unless the Acquisition is consummated, the Company will continue to hold an indirect minority interest in Tex-Mex and TFM. As a minority shareholder, the Company is not in a position to control operations, strategies or financial decisions without the concurrence of Grupo TMM, the largest shareholder in Grupo TFM. In addition, conflicts currently exist and may arise in the future between the Company’s business objectives and those of Grupo TMM. The Company is currently in a dispute with Grupo TMM over Grupo TMM’s attempt to terminate the Acquisition Agreement. The Company cannot assure that this dispute will be resolved in the Company’s favor. If the Acquisition is not consummated, resolution of any future conflicts in the Company’s favor may be difficult or impossible given the Company’s minority ownership position. In addition, the Company’sKCS’ operations are dependent on interchange, trackage rights, haulage rights and marketing agreements with other railroads and third parties that enable itKCS to exchange traffic and utilize trackage the Company does not own. The Company’sKCS’ ability to provide comprehensive rail service to the Company’sits customers depends in large part upon the Company’sits ability to maintain these agreements with other railroads and third parties. The termination of, or the failure to renew, these agreements could adversely affect the Company’sKCS’ business, financial condition and results of operations. The CompanyKCS is also dependent in part upon the financial health and efficient performance of

other railroads. For example, traffic moves over the UP’s lines via trackage rights, a significant portion of KCSR’s grain shipments originate with another rail carrier pursuant to marketing agreements with that carrier, and BNSF is KCS’ largest partner in the interchange of rail traffic. There can be no assurance that the CompanyKCS will not be materially adversely affected adversely by operational or financial difficulties of other railroads.

The Company’s Mexican and Panamanian Investments subject the Company

Pursuant to political and economic risks. The Company’s investment in Grupo TFM involves a number of risks. The Mexican government exercises significant influence over the Mexican economy and its actions could have a significant impact on TFM. The Company’s Mexican investment may also be adversely affected by currency fluctuations, price instability, inflation, interest rates, regulations, taxation, cultural differences, social instability, labor disputes and other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Mexico. Moreover, TFM’s commercial success is heavily dependent on expected increases in U.S.-Mexico trade and will be strongly influenced by the effect of NAFTA on such trade. Downturns in either of the U.S. or Mexican economies or in trade between the United States and Mexico would be likely to adversely impact TFM’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the Mexican government may revoke the exclusivity of TFM’s Concession after 20 years if it determines that there is insufficient competition and may terminate the Concession, KCSM is required to grant rights to use portions of its tracks to Ferromex, Ferrosur and FTVM. Applicable law stipulates that Ferromex, Ferrosur and FTVM are required to grant to KCSM rights to use portions of their tracks. KCSM’s Concession classifies trackage rights as a resultshort trackage


10


rights and long-distance trackage rights. Although all of certain conditions or events. TFM’s assets and itsthese trackage rights have been granted under the Concession, may also be seized temporarily byno railroad has actually operated under the long-distance trackage rights because the means of setting rates for usage and often related terms of usage have not been agreed upon. Under the Mexican government. Revocation or terminationrailroad services law and regulations, the rates KCSM may charge for the right to use its tracks must be agreed upon in writing between KCSM and the party to which those rights are granted. However, if KCSM cannot reach an agreement on rates with rail carriers entitled to trackage rights on KCSM’s rail lines, the SCT is entitled to set the rates in accordance with Mexican law and regulation, which rates may not adequately compensate KCSM. KCSM and Ferromex have not been able to agree upon the rates each of them is required to pay the other for interline services and haulage and trackage rights. KCSM and Ferromex are involved in civil, commercial and administrative proceedings in connection with amounts payable to each other for interline services, haulage and trackage rights. On March 13, 2002, the SCT issued a ruling setting the rates for trackage and haulage rights. On August 5, 2002, the SCT issued a ruling setting the rates for interline and terminal services. KCSM and Ferromex appealed both rulings to the Mexican Supreme Court. KCSM and Ferromex also requested and obtained a suspension of the Concession would materially adversely affect TFM’s operationseffectiveness of the SCT rulings pending resolution of the litigation. In February 2006, the Mexican Supreme Court sustained KCSM’s appeal of the SCT’s trackage and haulage rights ruling, vacated the SCT ruling and ordered the SCT to issue a new ruling consistent with the Court’s opinion. The Company has not yet received the written opinion of the Mexican Supreme Court on the February 2006 ruling, nor has the Court decided the interline and terminal services appeal. On October 2, 2006, KCSM was served with a claim by Ferromex asking for information concerning the interline traffic between KCSM and Ferromex from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004. KCSM has filed an answer to this claim. KCS cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, or whether the rates KCSM is ultimately permitted to charge will be sufficient to adequately compensate it for the use of its ability to make payments on its debt. tracks by Ferromex.
The Company’s investment in PCRCCompany is highly leveraged and has risks associated with operating in Panama, including, among others, cultural differences, varying labor and operating practices, political risk and differences between the U.S. and Panamanian economies. There can be no assurances that the various risks associated with operating in Mexico can be effectively and economically mitigated by TFM or that the risks associated with operating in Panama can be effectively and economically mitigated by PCRC.

The Company’ssignificant debt service obligations. KCS’ leverage could adversely affect its ability to fulfill obligations under various debt instruments and operate its business. The Company is leveraged and will have significant debt service obligations. In addition, Grupo TFM is also leveraged and the acquisition of a controlling interest in Grupo TFM would increase the Company’s consolidated indebtedness and leverage. The Company’s

KCS’ level of debt could make it more difficult for it to borrow money in the future, willmay reduce the amount of money available to finance the Company’s operations and other business activities, exposes itthe Company to the risk of increased interest rates, makes it more vulnerable to general economic downturns and adverse industry conditions, and could reduce the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or responding to, changing business and economic conditions, and may prevent it from raising the funds necessary to repurchase all of certain senior notes that could be tendered upon the occurrence of a change of control, which would constitute an event of default, or all of the Convertible Preferred Stock that could be put to the Company under certain circumstances. The Company’sconditions. KCS’ failure to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants in the Company’sits debt instruments, which, among other things, require itKCS to maintain specified financial ratios and limit the Company’s ability to incur debt and sell assets, could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or prospects. The Company is currently exploring alternatives to refinance its existing credit facility, including its revolving credit facility. The Company has received firm commitment letters from various banks and institutional investors committing to fully fund the new facility and management expects to close this refinancing transaction prior to March 31, 2004. If, however, this transaction is not consummated on or prior to March 31, 2004, management believes that the Company may be in violation of certain of the financial covenants of its credit facility. If the Company does not have enough cash to service its debt, meet other obligations and fund other liquidity needs, the CompanyKCS may be required to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing all or part of itsthe existing debt, or seeking additional equity capital. The CompanyKCS cannot assure that any of these remedies, including obtaining appropriate waivers from its lenders, can be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict the Company from adopting any of these alternatives.
The indebtedness of KCSM exposes it to risks of exchange rate fluctuations, because any devaluation of the peso would cause the cost of KCSM’s dollar-denominated debt to increase, and could place the Company at a competitive disadvantage in Mexico compared to Mexican competitors that have less debt and greater operating and financing flexibility than KCSM does.
KCS’ business is capital intensive.
The Company’s business is capital intensive and requires substantial ongoing expenditures for, among other things, additions and improvements to roadway, structures and technology, acquisitions, and maintenance and repair of equipment and rail system. KCS’ failure to make necessary capital expenditures to maintain its operations could impair its ability to serve existing customers or accommodate increases in traffic volumes.


11


KCS has funded, and expects to continue to fund, capital expenditures with funds from operating cash flows, leases and, to a lesser extent, vendor financing. KCS may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows from its operations or obtain sufficient funds from external sources to fund capital expenditure requirements. If financing is available, it may not be obtainable on acceptable terms and within the limitations contained in the indentures and other agreements relating to KCS’ debt.
KCSM’s Concession from the Mexican government requires KCSM to make investments and undertake capital projects. If KCSM is unable to make such capital investments, KCSM’s business plan commitments with the Mexican government may be at risk, requiring KCSM to seek waivers of its business plan. There is no assurance that such waivers, if requested, would be granted by the SCT. KCSM may defer capital expenditures under its business plan with the permission of the SCT. However, the SCT might not grant this permission, and any failure by KCSM to comply with the capital investment commitments in its business plan could result in sanctions imposed by the SCT. The Company cannot assure that the Mexican government would grant any such permission or waiver. If such permission or waiver is not obtained in any instance and KCSM is sanctioned, its Concession might be at risk of revocation, which would adversely affect KCS’ financial condition and results of operations. See “KCSM’s Mexican Concession is subject to revocation or termination in certain circumstances” below.
KCS’ business may be adversely affected by changes in general economic, weather or other conditions.The Company’s
KCS’ operations may be adversely affected by changes in the economic conditions of the industries and geographic areas that produce and consume the freight that the CompanyKCS transports. The relative strength or

weakness of the United States economy as well as various international and regionalMexican economies also affectsaffect the businesses served. Grupo TFM,served by KCS. PCRC and Panarail are more directly affected by their respectivethe Panamanian local economy.economy and trans-Pacific trade flows. KCS’ investments in Mexico and Panama expose the Company to risks associated with operating in Mexico and Panama, including, among others, cultural differences, varying labor and operating practices, political risk and differences between the United States, Mexican and Panamanian economies. Historically, a stronger economy has resulted in improved results for KCS’ rail transportation operations. Conversely, when the economy has slowed, results have been less favorable. The Company’sKCS’ revenues may be affected by prevailing economic conditions and, if an economic slowdown or recession occurs in the Company’s key markets, the volume of rail shipments is likely to be reduced. Additionally, the

The Company’s operations may also be affected by natural disasters or adverse weather conditions. AThe Company operates in and along the Gulf Coast of the United States, and its facilities may be adversely affected by hurricanes and other extreme weather conditions. For example, hurricanes have adversely affected some of the Company’s shippers located along the Gulf Coast and caused interruptions in the flow of traffic within the southern United States and between the United States and Mexico. As another example, a weak harvest in the Midwest for example, may substantially reduce the volume of business handled for agricultural products customers. Additionally, manyMany of the goods and commodities the Company transportstransported experience cyclical demand. The Company’sKCS’ results of operations can be expected to reflect this cyclical demand because of the significant fixed costs inherent in railroad operations. The Company’s operations may also be affected by natural disasters or terrorist acts. Significant reductions in the Company’s volume of rail shipments due to economic, weather or other conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sKCS’ business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The transportation industry is highly cyclical, generally tracking the cycles of the world economy. Although transportation markets are affected by general economic conditions, there are numerous specific factors within each particular market segment that may influence operating results. Some of KCS’ customers do business in industries that are highly cyclical, including the oil and gas, automotive, housing and agricultural industries. Any downturn in these industries could have a material adverse effect on operating results. Also, some of the products transported have had a historical pattern of price cyclicality which has typically been influenced by the general economic environment and by industry capacity and demand. For example, global steel and petrochemical prices have decreased in the past. KCS cannot assure that prices and demand for these products will not decline in the future, adversely affecting those industries and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition or results.


12


The Company Is SubjectKCS’ business is subject to Governmental Regulation.regulation by international, federal, state and local regulatory agencies. KCS’ failure to comply with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on its operations.The Company
KCS is subject to governmental regulation by international, federal, state and local regulatory agencies with respect to its railroad operations, as well as a variety of health, safety, labor, environmental, and other matters. Government regulation of the railroad industry is a significant determinant of the competitiveness and profitability of railroads. The Company’sKCS’ failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on its operations, including limitations on the Company’s operating activities until compliance with applicable requirements is completed.achieved. These government agencies may change the legislative or regulatory framework within which the Company operates without providing any recourse for any adverse effects on the Company’sits business that occursoccur as a result of thissuch change. Additionally, some of the regulations require the CompanyKCS to obtain and maintain various licenses, permits and other authorizations, and the CompanyKCS cannot assure that it will continue to be able to do so.

The Company Is Subject to Environmental Laws and Regulations.The Company’s business is subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that could require KCS to incur material costs or liabilities relating to environmental, health or safety compliance or remediation.
KCS’ operations are subject to extensive international, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning, among other things, emissions to the air, discharges to waters, the handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and other materials, andthe cleanup of hazardous material or petroleum releases, decommissioning of underground storage tanks and soilnoise pollution. Violations of these laws and groundwater contamination.regulations can result in substantial penalties, permit revocations, facility shutdowns and other civil and criminal sanctions. From time to time, certain of KCS’ facilities have not been in compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and there can be no assurances that KCS will always be in compliance with such laws and regulations in the future. The Company incurs, and expects to continue to incur, environmental compliance costs, including, in particular, costs necessary to maintain compliance with requirements governing chemical and hazardous material shipping operations, refueling operations and repair facilities. New laws and regulations, stricter enforcement of existing requirements, new spills, releases or violations or the discovery of previously unknown contamination could require the CompanyKCS to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sKCS’ business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In the operation of a railroad, it is possible that derailments, explosions or other accidents may occur that could cause harm to the environment or to human life or health. As a result, KCS may incur costs in the future, which may be material, to address any such harm, including costs relating to the performance ofclean-ups, natural resources damages and compensatory or punitive damages relating to harm to property or individuals.
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or “Superfund”) and similar state laws (known as “Superfund laws”) impose liability for the cost of remedial or removal actions, natural resources damages and related costs at certain sites identified as posing a threat to the environment or public health. CERCLA imposes joint, strict and several liability on the owners and operators of facilities in which hazardous waste and other hazardous substances are deposited or from which they are released or are likely to be released into the environment. Liability may be imposed, without regard to fault or the legality of the activity, on certain classes of persons, including the current and certain prior owners or operators of a site where hazardous substances have been released and persons that arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances. In addition, other potentially responsible parties, adjacent landowners or other third parties may initiate cost recovery actions or toxic tort litigation against sites subject to CERCLA or similar state laws. Given the nature of its business, KCS presently has environmental investigation and remediation obligations at certain sites, including a former foundry site in Alexandria, Louisiana, and will likely incur such obligations at additional sites in the future. Liabilities accrued for environmental costs represent the Company’s best estimate of the probable future obligation for the remediation and settlement of these sites. Although the recorded liability includes the best estimate of all probable costs,clean-up costs can not be predicted with any certainty due to various factors such as evolving environmental laws and regulations,


13


changes in technology, the extent of other parties’ participation, developments in environmental surveys and studies, and the extent of corrective action that may ultimately be required.
The Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The primary environmental law in Mexico is the General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection (the “Ecological Law”). The Mexican federal agency in charge of overseeing compliance with and enforcement of the federal environmental law is the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources (“Semarnat”). The regulations issued under the Ecological Law and technical environmental requirements issued by Semarnat have promulgated standards for, among other things, water discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and solid waste. As part of its enforcement powers, Semarnat is empowered to bring administrative and criminal proceedings and impose economic sanctions against companies that violate environmental laws, and temporarily or even permanently close non-complying facilities. KCSM is also subject to the laws of various jurisdictions and international conferences with respect to the discharge of materials into the environment and to environmental laws and regulations issued by the governments of each of the Mexican states in which KCSM’s facilities are located. The terms of KCSM’s Concession from the Mexican government also impose environmental compliance obligations on KCSM. The Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that the adoption of additional or more stringent environmental laws and regulations would have on KCSM’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
KCS’ business is Vulnerablevulnerable to Rising Fuel Costsrising fuel costs and disruptions in fuel supplies. Any significant increase in the cost of fuel, or Disruptions in Fuel Supplies.severe disruption of fuel supplies, would have a material adverse effect on KCS’ business, results of operations and financial condition.The Company
KCS incurs substantial fuel costs in its railroad operations and these costs represent a significant portion of the Company’sits transportation expenses. Significant price increases for fuel may have a material adverse effect on operating results. Fuel expense increased from 16% of consolidated operating costs during 2005 to 19% of consolidated operating costs during 2006. KCS has been able to pass the majority of these fuel cost increases on to customers in the form of fuel surcharges applied to customer billings. If KCS is unable to continue the existing fuel surcharge program for KCSR and expand the fuel surcharge program for KCSM, operating results could be materially adversely affected.
On January 26, 2007, the Surface Transportation Board (the “STB”) issued a decision finding that the assessment by railroads of fuel surcharges that are based on a percentage of the base rate charged is an unreasonable practice. Railroads have 90 days following January 26 to comply with the decision. KCS is in the process of reviewing the manner by which it assesses fuel surcharges in order to timely comply with the decision. KCS cannot predict with certainty the impact that any changes to its fuel surcharge program may have on its business.
Fuel costs are affected by traffic levels, efficiency of operations and equipment, and petroleum market conditions. The supply and cost of fuel isare subject to market conditions and isare influenced by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions, world markets, government programs and regulations and competition. Significant price increasesIn addition, instability in the Middle East and interruptions in domestic production and refining due to hurricane damage may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results. Additionally,result in an increase in fuel prices. Fuel prices and supplies could also be affected by any limitation in the fuel supply or by any imposition of mandatory allocation or rationing regulations. In the event of a severe disruption of fuel supplies resulting from supply shortages, political unrest, a disruption of oil imports, weather events, war or otherwise, the resulting impact on fuel prices and subsequent price increases could materially adversely affect the Company’sKCS’ operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
KCS currently meets, and expects to continue to meet, fuel requirements for its Mexican operations almost exclusively through purchases at market prices from Petroleos Mexicanos, the national oil company of Mexico (“PEMEX”), a government-owned entity exclusively responsible for the distribution and sale of diesel fuel in Mexico. KCSM is party to a fuel supply contract with PEMEX of indefinite duration. Either party may terminate the contract upon 30 days written notice to the other at any time. If the fuel contract is terminated


14


and KCSM is unable to acquire diesel fuel from alternate sources on acceptable terms, the Mexican operations could be materially adversely affected.
A MajorityThe loss of key personnel could negatively affect business.
KCS’ success substantially depends on its ability to attract and retain key members of the Company’s Employees Belongsenior management team and the principals of its foreign subsidiaries. Recruiting, motivating and retaining qualified management personnel, particularly those with expertise in the railroad industry, are vital to Labor Unions,operations and success. There is substantial competition for qualified management personnel and there can be no assurance that KCS will always be able to attract or retain qualified personnel. Employment agreements with senior management are terminable at any time by either party. If KCS loses one or more of these key executives or principals, its ability to successfully implement its business plans and the value of its common stock could be materially adversely affected.
A majority of KCS’ employees belong to labor unions. Strikes or Work Stoppages Could Adversely Affect the Company’s Operations.work stoppages could adversely affect operations.
The Company is a party to collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions in the United States. Approximately 84%States and Mexico. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 81% of KCSR employees areand approximately 75% of KCSM employees were covered under these

agreements.by collective labor contracts. The Company may be subject to, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or work slowdowns as a result of disputes with regard to the terms ofunder these collective bargaining agreements and labor contracts or the Company’sKCS’ potential inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions. Moreover,In the United States, because such agreements are generally negotiated on an industry-wide basis, determination of the terms and conditions of future labor agreements have been and could continue to be beyond our control and, as a result, the CompanyKCS’ control. KCS may, therefore, be subject to terms and conditions in amended or futureindustry-wide labor agreements that could have a material adverse affect on ourits results of operations, financial position and cash flows. If the unionized workers in the United States or Mexico were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, orif other employees were to become unionized, or if the terms and conditions in future labor agreements were renegotiated, the CompanyKCS could experience a significant disruption of its operations and higher ongoing labor costs.

Although the U.S. Railway Labor Act imposes restrictions on the right of United States railway workers to strike, there is no law in Mexico imposing similar restrictions on the right of railway workers in that country to strike.

OneKCS faces possible catastrophic loss and liability, and its insurance may not be sufficient to cover its damages or damages to others.
The operation of any railroad carries with it an inherent risk of catastrophe, mechanical failure, collision and property loss. In the Company’s coal customers accounts for approximately 10%course of KCS’s total revenues.The Company’s largest coal customer, Southwestern Electric Power Company (“SWEPCO”),KCS’ operations, spills or other environmental mishaps, cargo loss or damage, business interruption due to political developments, as well as labor disputes, strikes and adverse weather conditions, could result in a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc., accounted for approximately 61.7% of the Company’s coal revenues and approximately 9.8% of KCS’s total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003. The loss of allrevenues or increased liabilities and costs. Collisions, environmental mishaps or other accidents can cause serious bodily injury, death and extensive property damage, particularly when such accidents occur in heavily populated areas. Additionally, KCS’ operations may be affected from time to time by natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanoes, floods, hurricanes or other storms. The occurrence of a significant part of SWEPCO’s business, ormajor natural disaster could have a service outage at one or both of SWEPCO’s facilities that KCSR serves, could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results ofmaterial adverse effect on KCS’ operations and cash flows.

The Company May Be Subject to Various Claims and Lawsuits. The nature of the railroad business exposes the Company to the potential for various claims and litigation related to labor and employment, personal injury and property damage, environmental and other matters.financial condition. The Company maintains insurance (including self-insurance)that is consistent with the industry practice against the accident-related risks involved in the operationconduct of its business and business interruption due to natural disaster. However, this insurance is subject to a number of limitations on coverage, depending on the nature of the railroad. However, there can be no assurance that suchrisk insured against. This insurance wouldmay not be sufficient to cover the cost ofKCS’ damages suffered or that suchdamages to others, and this insurance willmay not continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates. Any material changesEven with insurance, if any catastrophic interruption of service occurs, KCS may not be able to current litigation trends could haverestore service without a materialsignificant interruption to operations and an adverse effect on the Company’s resultsKCS’ financial condition.


15


KCS’ business may be affected by future acts of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The Company May Be Affected by Future Acts of Terrorismterrorism or War.war.

Terrorist attacks, such as those that occurredan attack on September 11, 2001,the Company’s chemical transportation activities, any government response thereto and war or risk of war may adversely affect the Company’sKCS’ results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. These acts may also impact the Company’s ability to raise capital or the Company’sits future business opportunities. The Company’sKCS’ rail lines and facilities could be direct targets or indirect casualties of an act or acts of terror, which could cause significant business interruption and result in increased costs and liabilities and decreased revenues. These acts could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sKCS’ results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. In addition, insurance premiums charged for some or all of the terrorism coverage currently maintained by the CompanyKCS could increase dramatically or certain coverage may not be available in the future.
KCSM’s Mexican Concession is subject to revocation or termination in certain circumstances.

KCSM operates under aRECENT DEVELOPMENTS50-year

Refinancing Concession granted by the Mexican government. The Concession gives KCSM exclusive rights to provide freight transportation services over its rail lines for 30 years of Senior Secured Credit Facility. On March 1,the50-year Concession, subject to certain trackage rights. The SCT is principally responsible for regulating railroad services in Mexico. The SCT has broad powers to monitor KCSM’s compliance with the Concession and it can require KCSM to supply it with any technical, administrative and financial information it requests. KCSM must comply with the investment commitments established in its business plan, which forms an integral part of the Concession, and must update the plan every five years. The SCT treats KCSM’s business plans confidentially. The SCT monitors KCSM’s compliance with efficiency and safety standards established in the Concession. The SCT reviews, and may amend, these standards every five years.

The Mexican railroad services law and regulations provide the Mexican government certain rights in its relationship with KCSM under the Concession, including the right to take over the management of KCSM and its railroad in certain extraordinary cases, such as imminent danger to national security. In the past, the Mexican government has used such power with respect to other privatized industries, including the telecommunications industry, to ensure continued service during labor disputes. In addition, under the Concession and the Mexican railroad services law and regulations, the SCT, in consultation with the Mexican Antitrust Commission, reserves the right to set tariffs if it determines that effective competition does not exist. The Mexican Antitrust Commission, however, has not published guidelines regarding the factors that constitute a lack of competition. It is therefore unclear under what particular circumstances the Mexican Antitrust Commission would deem a lack of competition to exist. If the SCT intervenes and sets tariffs, the rates it sets may be too low to allow KCSM to operate profitably.
The Concession is renewable for up to 50 years, subject to certain conditions. The SCT may terminate the Concession if, among other things, there is an unjustified interruption in the operation of KCSM’s rail lines, KCSM charges tariffs higher than the tariffs it has registered with the SCT, KCSM restricts the ability of other Mexican rail operators to use its rail lines, KCSM fails to make payments for damages caused during the performance of services, KCSM fails to comply with any term or condition of the Mexican railroad services law and regulations, KCSM fails to make the capital investments required under its five-year business plan filed with the SCT, or KCSM fails to maintain an obligations compliance bond and insurance coverage as specified in the Mexican railroad services law and regulations. In addition, the Concession would revoke automatically if KCSM changes its nationality or assigns or creates any lien on the Concession without the SCT’s approval. The SCT may also terminate the Concession as a result of KCSM’s surrender of its rights under the Concession, or for reasons of public interest, by revocation or upon KCSM’s liquidation or bankruptcy. Revocation or termination of the Concession would prevent KCSM from operating its railroad and would materially adversely affect the Mexican operations and the ability to make payments on KCSM’s debt. If the Concession is revoked by the SCT, KCSM would receive no revenue, and its interest in its rail lines and all other fixtures covered by the Concession, as well as all improvements made by it, would revert to the Mexican government.
In April 2006, the SCT initiated sanction proceedings against KCSM, claiming that KCSM had failed to make the minimum capital investments projected for 2004 and 2005 under its five-year business plan filed with the SCT. Although the Company repaid approximately $38.5 million of term debt (“Term B Loan”) underbelieves KCSM made capital expenditures exceeding the amounts


16


projected in its senior secured credit facility (“Amended KCS Credit Facility”) using cash on-hand. After consideration of this repayment,business plan for 2004 and 2005, the outstanding balance underSCT has objected to the Term B Loan was $60 million. The Amended KCS Credit Facility also includes a revolving credit facility with a maximum borrowing amount of $100 million (“Revolving Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2003, no amounts had been borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility. Further, no amounts have been borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility during 2004.

The Company is currently in the process of refinancing the Amended KCS Credit Facility, including the Revolving Credit Facility. Under the proposed termsnature of the new senior secured credit facility (“2004 KCS Credit Facility”), the Company expects to borrow $150 million under a new term loan due March 2008 (“2004 Term B Loan”). Additionally, the 2004 KCS Credit Facility provides for a new revolving credit facility, which expires in March 2007, with a maximum borrowing amount of $100 million (“2004 Revolving Credit Facility”). The Company does not anticipate any borrowing under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2004. The

Companyinvestments made by KCSM. KCSM has received firm commitment letters from various banks and institutional investors committing to fully fund the new loans and agreeingresponded to the term sheet of the 2004 KCS Credit Facility. The commitments are subject only to proper documentation of the new facility. KCS management expects to close this refinancing transaction prior to March 31, 2004. If, however, the 2004 KCS Credit Facility is not consummated on or prior to March 31, 2004, the Company may beSCT by providing evidence in technical default of certainsupport of its existing financial covenants under the Amended KCS Credit Facility.

Prior to or at the same time as the completion of the refinancing transaction, management expects to use $60 million of cash on-hand to repay the existing Term B Loan.investments and explaining why it believes sanctions are not appropriate. The $150 million of proceeds from the 2004 Term B Loan is expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including financing a portion of the Acquisition, if it occurs. The remaining costs of the Acquisition are expected to be financed using a combination of cash on-hand, available liquidity under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility or other capital market transactions. As further described below in “Recent Developments—Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM from Grupo TMM,” the CompanySCT has not yet determined whether it would exercise itsresponded to KCSM’s arguments. KCSM will have the right to pay upchallenge a negative ruling by the SCT before the Administrative Federal Court, and, if necessary, the right to $80 millionchallenge any negative ruling by the Administrative Federal Court before a Federal Magistrate’s Tribunal. However, if these proceedings are determined adversely to KCSM and sanctions are imposed, KCSM could be subject to fines, and could be subject to possible future revocation of the cash portionConcession if the SCT imposes sanctions on three additional occasions over the remaining term of the Acquisition purchase price by delivering upConcession.

Under the Concession, KCSM has the right to 6,400,000 common shares. Also see “Recent Developments—Dispute over Acquisition Agreement.” As a result ofoperate its rail lines, but it does not own the refinancing transaction described above, the Company expects to report a charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2004 of approximately $4 million related to the write-off of existing deferred financing costs.

Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM from Grupo TMM.On April 20, 2003, the Company entered into the Acquisition Agreement with Grupo TMM and other parties under which KCS ultimately would acquire control of TFM through the purchase of shares of common stock of Grupo TFM. Grupo TFM holds an 80% economic interest in TFM and all of the shares of stock with full voting rights of TFM. The remaining 20% economic interest in TFM is owned byland, roadway or associated structures. If the Mexican government legally terminates the Concession, it would own, control and manage such public domain assets used in the formoperation of shares with limited voting rights. KCSM’s rail lines. The Mexican government may also temporarily seize control of KCSM’s rail lines and its assets in the event of a natural disaster, war, significant public disturbances or imminent danger to the domestic peace or economy. In such a case, the SCT may restrict KCSM’s ability to exploit the Concession in such manner as the SCT deems necessary under the circumstances, but only for the duration of any of the foregoing events.

Mexican law requires that the Mexican government pay compensation if it effects a statutory appropriation for reasons of the public interest. With respect to a temporary seizure due to any cause other than international war, the Mexican railroad services law and regulations provide that the Mexican government will indemnify an affected Concessionaire for an amount equal to damages caused and losses suffered. However, these payments may not be sufficient to compensate KCSM for its losses and may not be timely made.
The Company’s ownership of KCSM and operations in Mexico subject it to economic and political risks.
The Mexican government has putexercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Mexican economy. Accordingly, Mexican governmental actions concerning the economy and state-owned enterprises could have a significant impact on Mexican private sector entities in general and on the Mexican operations in particular. The national elections held on July 2, 2000, ended 71 years of rule by the Institutional Revolutionary Party and resulted in the increased representation of opposition parties in the Mexican Congress and in mayoral and gubernatorial positions. National elections were again held on July 2, 2006, which were disputed by the losing presidential candidate and his supporters. Although there have not yet been any material adverse repercussions resulting from this political change, multiparty rule is still relatively new in Mexico and could result in economic or political conditions that could materially and adversely affect the Mexican operations. KCS cannot predict the impact that this new political landscape will have on the Mexican economy. Furthermore, KCSM’s financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be affected by currency fluctuations, inflation, interest rates, regulation, taxation, social instability and other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Mexico.
Mexican national politicians are currently focused on certain regional political and social tension, and reforms regarding fiscal and labor policies, gas, electricity, social security and oil have not been and may not be approved. The social and political situation in Mexico could adversely affect the Mexican economy, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on KCS’ business, financial condition and results of operation.
The Mexican economy in the past has suffered balance of payment deficits and shortages in foreign exchange reserves. There are currently no exchange controls in Mexico. However, Mexico has imposed foreign exchange controls in the past. Pursuant to the provisions of NAFTA, if Mexico experiences serious balance of payment difficulties or the threat of such difficulties in the future, Mexico would have the right to impose foreign exchange controls on investments made in Mexico, including those made by United States and Canadian investors. Any restrictive exchange control policy could adversely affect KCS’ ability to obtain dollars or to convert pesos into dollars for purposes of making interest and principal payments due on indebtedness, to the extent KCS may have to effect those conversions, and could adversely affect the Mexican economy or the Company’s investment in KCSM. This could have a material adverse effect on KCS’ business and financial condition.


17


Securities of companies in emerging market countries tend to be influenced by economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries. Some emerging market countries, including Argentina and Brazil, have experienced significant economic downturns and market volatility in the past. These events have had an adverse effect on the economic conditions and securities markets of other emerging market countries, including Mexico.
Downturns in the United States economy or in trade between the United States and Mexico and fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rate would likely have adverse effects on KCS’ business and results of operations.
The level and timing of KCS’ Mexican business activity is heavily dependent upon the level of United States-Mexican trade and the effects of NAFTA on such trade. The Mexican operations depend on the United States and Mexican markets for the products KCSM transports, the relative position of Mexico and the United States in these markets at any given time, and tariffs or other barriers to trade. Downturns in the United States or Mexican economy or in trade between the United States and Mexico would likely have adverse effects on KCS’ business and results of operations. The Mexican operations depend on the United States and Mexican markets for the products KCSM transports, the relative position of Mexico and the United States in these markets at any given time, and tariffs or other barriers to trade. Any future downturn in the United States economy could have a material adverse effect on KCS’ results of operations and our ability to meet debt service obligations.
Also, fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rate could lead to shifts in the types and volumes of Mexican imports and exports. Although a decrease in the level of exports of some of the commodities that KCSM transports to the United States may be offset by a subsequent increase in imports of other commodities KCSM hauls into Mexico and vice versa, any offsetting increase might not occur on a timely basis, if at all. Future developments in United States-Mexican trade beyond the Company’s control may result in a reduction of freight volumes or in an unfavorable shift in the mix of products and commodities KCSM carries.
Any devaluation of the peso would cause the peso cost of KCSM’s dollar-denominated debt to increase, adversely affecting its ability to make payments on its indebtedness. Severe devaluation or depreciation of the peso may result in disruption of the international foreign exchange markets and may limit the ability to transfer pesos or to convert pesos into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making timely payments of interest and principal on the non-peso denominated indebtedness. Although the Mexican government currently does not restrict, and for many years has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer foreign currencies out of Mexico, the Mexican government could, as in the past, institute restrictive exchange rate policies that could limit the ability to transfer or convert pesos into U.S. dollars or other currencies for the purpose of making timely payments of the U.S. dollar-denominated debt and contractual commitments. Devaluation or depreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar may also adversely affect U.S. dollar prices for KCS’ securities. Currency fluctuations are likely to continue to have an effect on KCS’ financial condition in future periods.
KCSM has identified possible discrepancies in data provided by its prior information system.
KCSM installed a new operational information system in 2006. Based on testing of the data provided by this system, including a comparison of such data to data provided by KCSM’s prior information system, it is possible that the data provided by KCSM’s prior information system may have contained discrepancies. There is uncertainty as to what effect, if any, these discrepancies could have on KCSM’s financial condition or results of operations, however there can be no assurance that the effect will not be material.
Mexico may experience high levels of inflation in the future which could adversely affect KCS’ results of operations.
Mexico has a history of high levels of inflation, and may experience high inflation in the future. During most of the 1980s and during the mid- andlate-1990s, Mexico experienced periods of high levels of inflation. The annual rates of inflation for the last five years, as measured by changes in the National Consumer Price


18


Index, as provided by Banco de Mexico, were 4.0% in 2006, 3.3% in 2005, 5.2% in 2004, 4.0% in 2003 and 5.7% in 2002. A substantial increase in the Mexican inflation rate would have the effect of increasing some of KCSM’s costs, which could adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. High levels of inflation may also affect the balance of trade between Mexico and the United States, and other countries, which could adversely affect KCSM’s results of operations.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.Properties
Property information is provided for each of KCS’ two business segments, the United States (“U.S.”) and Mexico.
U.S. Segment.
Certain KCSR property statistics follow at December 31:
             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Route miles — main and branch line  3,205   3,226   3,108 
Total track miles  4,446   4,372   4,353 
Miles of welded rail in service  2,321   2,320   2,322 
Main line welded rail percent  72%  72%  61%
Cross ties replaced  427,590   340,033   292,843 
KCSR and Mexrail’s fleet of locomotives and rolling stock consisted of the following at December 31:
                         
  2006  2005  2004 
  Leased  Owned  Leased  Owned  Leased  Owned 
 
Locomotives  272   348   331   315   279   239 
                         
Rolling stock:
                        
Box cars  5,386   1,356   5,401   1,323   5,204   1,307 
Gondolas  1,037   176   1,093   185   720   83 
Hopper cars  4,222   743   4,323   989   3,084   802 
Flat cars (intermodal and other)  1,985   388   844   531   1,288   533 
Auto racks  198      198      198    
Tank cars  24   30   24   28   28   30 
Other     3             
                         
Total  12,852   2,696   11,883   3,056   10,522   2,755 
                         
             
Average age (in years):
 2006  2005  2004 
 
Road locomotives  22.9   25.2   26.0 
All locomotives  23.9   26.1   26.9 
KCSR, in support of its transportation operations, owns and operates repair shops, depots and office buildings along itsright-of-way. A major facility, the Deramus Yard, is located in Shreveport, Louisiana and includes a general office building, locomotive repair shop, car repair shops, customer service center, material warehouses and fueling facilities totaling 227,000 square feet. Other facilities owned by KCSR include a 21,000 square foot freight car repair shop in Kansas City, Missouri and 15,000 square feet of office space in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. A locomotive repair facility in Kansas City is owned and operated by General


19


Electric Company (“GE”) and is used to maintain and repair locomotives that were manufactured by GE and are leased by KCSR.
KCSR owns 16.6% of the Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, which owns and operates 80 miles of track, and operates an additional eight miles of track under trackage rights in greater Kansas City, Missouri. KCSR also leases, for operating purposes, certain short sections of trackage owned by various other railroad companies and jointly owns certain other facilities with these railroads.
Mexico Segment.
Certain KCSM track statistics at December 31, 2006, follow(in miles):
             
  Under
  Track Usage
    
  Concession  Rights  Total 
 
Main track  2,645   541   3,186 
Sidings under centralized traffic control  116      116 
Spurs, yard tracks and other sidings  481      481 
             
Total  3,242   541   3,783 
             
All of KCSM’s track is standard gauge (56.5 inches) and is generally in good condition. Regarding the main track, 100% has 100 to 136-lbs. rail, 78% is continuously welded rail and 58% has concrete ties. Continuously welded rail reduces track maintenance and, in general, permits trains to travel at higher speeds. The Mexico City — Nuevo Laredo core route has 88% concrete ties and the portion of this route between Mexico City and Querétaro (a distance of 143 miles) has double track. KCSM has extended sidings on its tracks up to 10,000 feet, enabling longer trains to pass each other.
KCSM’s fleet of locomotives and rolling stock consisted of the following at December 31:
                 
  2006  2005 
  Leased  Owned  Leased  Owned 
 
Locomotives  113   344   75   323 
                 
Rolling stock:
                
Box cars  1,068   1,166   1,278   1,187 
Gondolas  2,520   1,817   2,922   1,824 
Hopper cars  2,416   570   2,518   580 
Flat cars (intermodal and other)  262   557   261   557 
Auto racks  1,552      1,556    
Tank cars  522   71   611   71 
Other     65      55 
                 
Total  8,340   4,246   9,146   4,274 
                 
Under its Concession from the Mexican government, KCSM has the right to operate the rail lines, but does not own the land, roadway or associated structures. The Concession requires KCSM to make investments and undertake capital projects, including capital projects described in a business plan filed every five years with the Mexican government. KCSM may defer capital expenditures with respect to its TFM shares asfive-year business plan with the permission of the SCT. However, should the SCT not grant this permission, KCSM’s failure to comply with the commitments in its business plan could result in the Mexican government revoking the Concession.
The response to Item 102 ofRegulation S-K under Item 1, “Business”, of thisForm 10-K and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” is incorporated by reference in partial response to this Item 2.


20


Item 3.Legal Proceedings
The matters discussed below. The obligationsin Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Provision for Environmental Remediation — Provision for Casualty Claims,” and — “Other — Litigation” are incorporated by reference in this Item 3.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three month period ended December 31, 2006.
Executive Officers of KCS and Grupo TMM to completeSubsidiaries.
All executive officers are elected annually and serve at the Acquisition are subject to a number of conditions. For additional discussiondiscretion of the termsBoard of Directors. All of the Acquisition Agreement, see Note 3executive officers have employment agreements with KCSand/or its subsidiaries. The mailing address of the principal executive officers is 427 W. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105.
Michael R. Haverty — Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer — 62 — The information in the NotesDefinitive Proxy Statement under the heading “The Board of Directors — Directors Serving Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2009” with respect to KCS’sMr. Haverty is incorporated by reference.
Arthur L. Shoener — KCS President and Chief Operating Officer — 60 — The information in the Definitive Proxy Statement in the description of “The Board of Directors — Directors Serving Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2008” with respect to Mr. Shoener is incorporated by reference.
Daniel W. Avramovich — Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing — 55 — Joined KCS in May 2006 as Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing. Prior to this, Mr. Avramovich served as President, Network Services — Americas for Exel plc from 2003 to 2006. From 2000 to 2003, he served as President, Exel Direct for Exel plc.
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — 49 — Joined KCS in May 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Ottensmeyer served as Financial Advisor/Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to May 2006 for Intranasal Therapeutics, Inc. From 2000 to 2001, he served as Corporate Vice President Finance and Treasurer for Dade-Behring Holdings, Inc. From 1993 to 1999, Mr. Ottensmeyer served as Vice President Finance and Treasurer at BNSF Railway.
Warren K. Erdman — Senior Vice President — Corporate Affairs — 48 — Served in this capacity since January 2006. Mr. Erdman served as Vice President - Corporate Affairs of KCS from April 1997 to December 2005, and as Vice President — Corporate Affairs of KCSR from May 1997 to December 2005. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Erdman was Chief of Staff to United States Senator Kit Bond of Missouri from 1987 to 1997.
Jerry W. Heavin — Senior Vice President — International Engineering of KCSR — 55 — Served in this capacity since January 2005, and a director of KCSR since July 2002. Mr. Heavin served as Senior Vice President of Operations from July 2002 to December 2004. Mr. Heavin joined KCSR in September 2001 and served as Vice President of Engineering of KCSR until July 2002. Prior to joining KCSR, Mr. Heavin served as an independent engineering consultant from 1997 through August 2001.
Larry M. Lawrence — Senior Vice President and Assistant to Chairman — Strategies and Staff Studies — 44 — Served in this capacity since January 2006. Mr. Lawrence served as Assistant to CEO — Staff Studies and Planning of KCS from November 2001 until December 2005. Prior to joining KCS in 2001, Mr. Lawrence was a strategy consultant for 15 years with McKinsey, A. T. Kearney and KPMG.
Paul J. Weyandt — Senior Vice President — Finance and Treasurer — 53 — Served in this capacity since April 2005. He served as Vice President and Treasurer of KCS and of KCSR from September 2001 until March 2005. Before joining KCS, Mr. Weyandt was a consultant to the Structured Finance Group of


21


GE Capital Corporation from May 2001 to September 2001. Prior to consulting, Mr. Weyandt spent 23 years with BNSF Railway, most recently as Assistant Vice President Finance and Assistant Treasurer.
William J. Wochner — Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer — 59 — Served in this capacity since February 2007. Served as Vice President and Interim General Counsel from December 2006 to January 2007. From September 2006 to December 2006, Mr. Wochner served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel. From March 2005 to September 2006, Mr. Wochner served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing/Contracts for KCSR. From February 1993 to March 2005, Mr. Wochner served as Vice President and General Solicitor of KCSR.
Richard M. Zuza — Senior Vice President — International Purchasing and Materials — 53 — Joined KCS in November 2005 as the Senior Vice President — International Purchasing and Materials. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Zuza was Vice President of Procurement for Allstate Insurance Company from 1998 to 2005, Vice President of Purchasing for Gibson Greetings, Inc. for seven years and held a variety of purchasing positions with General Electric Company for 15 years.
Michael K. Borrows — Vice President — Financial Reporting and Tax — 39 — Joined KCS in June 2006 as Vice President — Financial Reporting and Tax. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Borrows spent 11 years at BNSF Railway serving in a variety of financial roles, most recently as General Director Finance. Mr. Borrows is the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer.
There are no arrangements or understandings between the executive officers and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was or is to be selected as an officer of KCS, except with respect to the executive officers who have entered into employment agreements designating the position(s) to be held by the executive officer.
None of the above officers is related to another, or to any of the directors of KCS, by family.


22


Part II
Item 5.Market for KCS’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information.
The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The information set forth in response to Item 201 ofRegulation S-K in Note 8 and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K.10-K

The purpose of is incorporated by reference in partial response to this Item 5.

Dividend Policy.
Common Stock.  KCS has not declared any cash dividends on its common stock during the Acquisition islast five fiscal years and it does not anticipate making any cash dividend payments to place TFM, and if STB approval is obtained, Tex-Mex, under the control of KCS, which will also control KCSR and Gateway Eastern. KCS management believes that common control of these railroads, which are already physically linked in an end-to-end configuration, will enhance competition and give shippersstockholders in the NAFTA trade corridor a strong transportation alternative as they make their decisionsforeseeable future. Pursuant to move goods between the United States, Mexico and Canada. In addition, KCS management believes that this common control offers stockholders greater value through the operating efficiencies expected to come from common ownership and control. As part of this transaction, subject to KCS shareholder approval,KCSR’s credit agreement, KCS is expectedprohibited from the payment of cash dividends on its common stock.
Preferred Stock.  Kansas City Southern is restricted from paying dividends on its Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock when its coverage ratio (as defined in the indentures for KCSR’s 71/2% Senior Notes and 91/2% Senior Notes) is less than 2.0:1. It is the Company’s intention to change its name to NAFTA Rail.

Underpay timely dividends on all Preferred Stock in either cash or stock, depending upon the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, KCS would acquire allpreferred stock, when dividend payments are not restricted under the covenants of our various debt agreements and the Company has adequate levels of liquidity. In the event that dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock or Series D Preferred Stock are in arrears for six consecutive quarters (or an equivalent number of days in the aggregate, whether or not consecutive), holders of the interestSeries C Preferred Stock or the Series D Preferred Stock, as applicable, will be entitled to elect two of Grupo TMM in Grupo TFMthe authorized number of directors at the next annual stockholders’ meeting, and at each subsequent stockholders’ meeting until such time as all accumulated dividends are paid on the Series C Preferred Stock or the Series D Preferred Stock, as applicable, or set aside for $200 million in cashpayment.

See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and 18,000,000 sharesAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Recent Developments” for a new classdiscussion of common securitiesrecent amendments to the indentures for KCSR’s 71/2% Senior Notes and 91/2% Senior Notes related to these dividend payments.
Holders.
There were 4,941 record holders of KCS to be designated Class A Convertible Common Stock. KCS hascommon stock on February 15, 2007.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Part III, Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” for information about securities authorized for Issuance under KCS’ equity compensation plans.


23


Performance Graph.
The following graph shows the right to elect to pay up to $80 millionchanges in value over the five years ending December 31, 2006, of an assumed investment of $100 in: (i) KCS’ common stock; (ii) the stocks that comprise the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index1; and (iii) the stocks that comprise the S&P 500 Index2. The table following the graph shows the value of those investments on December 31 for each of the years indicated. The values for the assumed investments depicted on the graph and in the table have been calculated assuming that cash portion ofdividends are reinvested.
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Kansas City Southern, the purchase price by delivering up to 6,400,000 shares of KCS Class A Convertible Common Stock or KCS common stock. KCS has not yet determined whether it would exercise its right to pay up to $80 million of the cash portion of the purchase price by delivering up to 6,400,000 common shares. In addition, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, KCS would make an additional payment to Grupo TMM ranging between $100 million and $180 million. See “Value Added Tax (“VAT”) Lawsuit and VAT Contingency Payment under the Acquisition Agreement” below. KCS anticipates that it would pay the cash portion of the purchase price, which would range between $120 million and $200 million, using a combination of existing cash assets and proceeds from the 2004 KCS Credit Facility as further described above in “Refinancing of Senior Secured Credit Facility.”

In connection with the Acquisition, KCS would enter into a consulting agreement with a consulting company organized by Jose Serrano, Chairman of the Board of Grupo TMM, Grupo TFM and TFM, pursuant to

which it would provide consulting services to KCS in connection with the portion of the business of KCS in Mexico for a period of three years. As consideration for these services, the consulting company would receive an annual fee of $600,000 per year and a grant of 2,100,000 shares of restricted stock of KCS. The restricted stock would vest over a period of time subject to certain conditions. The consulting agreement may be extended for an additional year at the option of KCS, upon delivery of an additional 525,000 shares of common stock. The consulting agreement also provides for up to an additional 1,350,000 common shares to be issued contingent upon the achievement of certain objectives. The restricted stock issued S & P 500 Index

and the cash fee would likelyDow Jones Transportation Index
                               
   2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006
Kansas City Southern   100.00    84.93    101.34    125.48    172.89    205.10 
S & P 500   100.00    77.90    100.24    111.15    116.61    135.03 
Dow Jones Transportation Average   100.00    102.66    132.37    170.34    189.53    204.43 
                               
1 The Dow Jones Transportation Average is an index prepared by Dow Jones & Co., Inc., an independent company.
2 The S&P 500 is an index prepared by Standard and Poor’s Corporation, an independent company. The S&P 500 Index reflects the change in weighted average market value for 500 companies whose shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market.


24


Item 6.Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data below(in millions, except per share amounts) should be accounted forread in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included under Item 7 of thisForm 10-K as compensation expense inwell as the consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the Reports of KCS.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.

                     
  2006  2005(i)  2004  2003  2002 
 
Revenues $1,659.7  $1,352.0  $639.5  $581.3  $566.2 
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates  7.3   2.9   (4.5)  11.0   43.4 
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change and minority interest(ii)  109.2   83.1   24.4   3.3   57.2 
Earnings per common share — income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change:                    
Basic $1.20  $1.21  $0.25  $(0.04) $0.94 
Diluted  1.08   1.10   0.25   (0.04)  0.91 
Total assets $4,637.3  $4,423.6  $2,440.6  $2,152.9  $2,008.8 
Total debt obligations  1,757.0   1,860.6   665.7   523.4   582.6 
Cash dividends per common share $  $  $  $  $ 
(i)Amounts reflect the consolidation of Mexrail effective January 1, 2005, and KCSM effective April 1, 2005.
(ii)Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change and minority interest for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 include certain unusual operating expenses and other income as further described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations.” These costs and other income include charges for casualty claims, costs related to the acquisitions of Grupo KCSM and Mexrail, hurricane related charges, costs related to the implementation of the Management Control System (“MCS”), benefits received from the settlement of certain legal and insurance claims, severance costs and expenses associated with legal verdicts against KCS, and gains recorded on the sale of operating and non-operating property and investments.
The response to Item 301 ofRegulation S-K under Part II Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Grupo TMM areAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of thisForm 10-K is incorporated by reference in dispute over Grupo TMM’s attemptpartial response to terminatethis Item 6.
The following tables present full year 2006 non-GAAP financial information previously disclosed by the Acquisition AgreementCompany on its website in conjunction with earnings releases, presentations and8-K filings. The non-GAAP information presented, which management believes is useful, should be considered in addition to, but not as discussed below.

Dispute over Acquisition Agreement. In August 2003, Grupo TMM shareholders voted nota substitute or preferable to, approve the sale of Grupo TMM’s interests in Grupo TFM to KCS. Grupo TMM subsequently sent a notice to KCS claiming to terminate the Acquisition Agreement, because the Grupo TMM shareholders had failed to approve the Acquisition Agreement. KCS’s position has beenother information prepared and remains that the Acquisition Agreement does not provide that a negative shareholder vote by Grupo TMM shareholders is a basis for termination. KCS maintains that the Acquisition Agreement is still valid and remains in effect until at least December 31, 2004 (unless otherwise validly terminatedpresented in accordance with its terms).

KCS has taken actions to resolveGAAP. However, the information is included herein as reference because Management may use this dispute and to preserveinformation for comparability purposes when discussing the parties’ positions while it seeks to resolve the dispute. In August 2003, KCS initiated the dispute resolution process, which included an informal 60-day negotiation period between the parties. The parties were unable to resolve the dispute within that period of time. KCS filed a complaint in the Delaware Chancery Court alleging that Grupo TMM had breached the Acquisition Agreement and seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Grupo TMM not to take any action in violation of the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. KCS also filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery a motion for a preliminary injunction, which was granted, to preserve the parties’ positions while KCS seeks to resolve its dispute over Grupo TMM’s attempt to terminate the Acquisition Agreement.

On October 31, 2003, KCS initiated binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. In its Arbitration Demand, KCS seeks a determination that the Acquisition Agreement is in full force and effect, specific performance of the Acquisition Agreement,Company’s business and damages for Grupo TMM’s breachbelieves that the non-GAAP information provided is meaningful and can be particularly useful in assessing comparability of the terms ofCompany’s performance for the Acquisition Agreement and failure to negotiate in good faith during the 60-day negotiation period. By the agreement of the parties, the arbitration has been bifurcated. The first stage of the arbitration only addressed the question of whether Grupo TMM’s purported negative shareholder vote gave Grupo TMM the right to terminate the Acquisition Agreement. On March 22, 2004, the Company announced that the panel of the American Arbitration Association International Center for Dispute Resolution hearing the dispute between the Company and Grupo TMM issued its interim award on March 19, 2004 finding that the Acquisition Agreement remains in force and is binding on KCS and Grupo TMM in accordance with its terms. The arbitration panel concluded that the rejection of the Acquisition Agreement by Grupo TMM’s shareholders did not authorize Grupo TMM’s purported termination of the Acquisition Agreement. The Company and Grupo TMM will now move on to the second phase of the arbitration, which will decide the remaining issues, including remedies and damages.

In connection with certain actions taken by Grupo TMM, KCS filed a motion to enforce injunction and hold Grupo TMM in contempt in the dispute between KCS and Grupo TMM over the Acquisition Agreement. In January 2004, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a ruling, which held Grupo TMM in contempt of court for taking action inconsistent with the court’s previous order granting KCS’s motion for preliminary injunction. The court held that by Grupo TMM causing its subsidiary Grupo TFM to revoke powers of attorney requiring the signature of a KCS representative for transactions in excess of $2.5 million and in granting new powers of attorney to Grupo TMM directors, Jose Serrano and Mario Mohar to act on behalf of the company, Grupo TMM

violated provisions of the Acquisition Agreement. The previous order of the court required Grupo TMM to cause Grupo TFM to conduct its business in accordance with past practices and not to directly or indirectly amend its organizational documents. The court ordered Grupo TMM to take the actions necessary to revoke the new powers of attorney, to re-enact the original powers of attorney, and to pay KCS its costs and attorneys fees for bringing the motion for contempt.

As ofyears ended December 31, 2003, the Company has deferred approximately $9.3 million2005 and 2006.

Summary Income Statement Information
Calculation of costs2005 non-GAAP year to date earnings includes: (i) KCSM’s first quarter 2005 amounts prior to its consolidation on April 1, 2005 and (ii) excludes charges related to the Acquisition. Ifacquisition and the acquisition ultimately does not occur, these costs will be charged to expense. See Note 3write-off


25


of deferred profit sharing in the Notessecond quarter of 2005, (iii) excludes the unusually large charge to KCS’s Consolidated Financial StatementsCasualty and insurance reflecting a comprehensive study as well as the first time adoption of an actuarial approach for projecting expense related to certain casualty claims, and (iv) excludes the one-time non-cash gain as a result of the VAT settlement with the Mexican Government in the third quarter of 2005.
             
  As Reported
  All
  Non-GAAP
 
  2005  Differences  2005 
 
Revenues $1,352.0   170.1  $1,522.1 
Depreciation and amortization  127.7   18.4   146.1 
Casualties and insurance  103.4   (34.8)  68.6 
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing  41.1   (35.1)  6.0 
Other operating expenses  1,017.5   105.8   1,123.3 
             
Total operating expenses  1,289.7   54.3   1,344.0 
             
Operating income (loss)  62.3   115.8   178.1 
VAT/Put settlement gain, net  131.9   (131.9)   
Other income (expense)  (118.2)  (29.2)  (147.4)
             
Income before income taxes  76.0   (45.3)  30.7 
             
Income tax (benefit)  (7.1)  17.8   10.7 
Minority interest  17.8   (16.1)  1.7 
             
Net income  100.9   (79.2)  21.7 
             
Preferred stock dividends  9.5      9.5 
             
Net income available to common shareholders  91.4   (79.2)  12.2 
             
Diluted Shares  92,747       77,002 
Diluted EPS $1.10      $0.16 
Calculation of Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization and Non-cash Equity Earnings from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries (a)
         
  Non-GAAP
    
  2005  2006 
 
GAAP Net Income
 $100.9  $108.9 
All differences  (79.2)   
         
Adjusted net income  21.7   108.9 
Adjusted Income tax provision (benefit)  10.7   45.4 
Interest expense  163.6   167.2 
Loss in equity in earnings of unconsolidated subs — see (a) below  (3.7)  (7.3)
Depreciation and amortization  146.1   155.0 
         
EBITDA $338.4  $469.2 
         


26


Calculation of interest expense to include first quarter KCSM interest
         
  Non-GAAP
    
  2005  2006 
 
GAAP Interest Expense
 $133.5  $167.2 
All differences  30.1    
         
  $163.6  $167.2 
         
EBITDA $338.4  $469.2 
         
EBITDA Interest Coverage Ratio  2.07   2.81 
         
(a)For purpose of consistency, the Company uses the format of EBITDA specified in its bank covenants which also excludes non-cash earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries.
Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
         
  2005  2006 
 
Free Cash Flow $(119.4) $97.2 
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt  644.7   616.3 
Repayment of long-term debt  (521.5)  (658.5)
Other financing activities  (11.3)  (7.1)
         
GAAP Net Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 $(7.5) $47.9 
         
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion is intended to clarify and focus on Kansas City Southern’s results of operations, certain changes in its financial position, liquidity, capital structure and business developments for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of thisForm 10-K10-K. This discussion should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements, the related notes and the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, and other information included in this report.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Cautionary Information” for cautionary statements concerning forward-looking comments.
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
Kansas City Southern, a more detailed discussion ofDelaware corporation, is a holding company with principal operations in rail transportation and its principal subsidiaries and affiliates including the actions taken by KCS in connection with this dispute.following:
• The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary;
• Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary; which, in turn, wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”);
• Meridian Speedway, LLC (“MSLLC”), a ninety percent owned consolidated affiliate;
• Kansas City Southern de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KCSM”). On April 1, 2005, KCS completed its acquisition of control of KCSM and as of that date, KCSM became a consolidated subsidiary of KCS. On September 12, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries, Grupo KCSM, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo KCSM”) and KCSM, along with the Mexican holding company Grupo TMM, S.A. (“TMM”), entered into a settlement agreement with the Mexican government resolving the controversies and disputes between the companies and the Mexican government concerning the payment of a VAT refund to KCSM and the purchase of the remaining shares of KCSM owned by the Mexican government. As a result of this settlement, KCS and its subsidiaries now wholly own Grupo KCSM and KCSM. For the first quarter of 2005, KCS accounted for its investment in KCSM on the equity basis of accounting.


27


Mexican Government’s Put Rights With Respect to TFM Stock.The Mexican government has the right to compel the purchase of its 20% interest in TFM (referred to

• Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (“Southern Capital”), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate that owns and leases locomotives and other rail equipment;
• Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate which owns all of the common stock of Panarail Tourism Company (“Panarail”).
• Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”), a twenty five percent owned unconsolidated affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary services in the greater Mexico City area.
KCS, as the “Put”)holding company, supplies its various subsidiaries with managerial, legal, tax, financial and accounting services, in addition to managing other “non-operating” investments.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2006 Financial Overview.
The Company achieved consolidated net income of $108.9 million in 2006, as compared to net income of $100.9 million in 2005. The 2005 net income includes a non-recurring gain of $131.9 million related to the VAT/Put settlement. Excluding this non recurring item, net income increased $139.9 million over the prior year.
Operating income increased $242 million in 2006 to $304.3 million as compared to $62.3 million in 2005. The increase in operating income was driven primarily by Grupo TFM following notificationincreased revenues during the year. The Company achieved record revenues of $1,659.7 million in 2006, which was a 23% increase over revenues of $1,352 million in 2005. Revenue in 2006 included a full year of consolidated results. The revenue increase was primarily driven by price increases, new and expanding business in both the U.S. and Mexico, and by the Mexican government in accordance with the termscontinued integration of the applicable agreements. Upon exercise of the Put, Grupo TFM would be obligated to purchase the TFM capital stock at the initial share price paid by Grupo TFM adjusted for interest and inflation. Prior to October 30, 2003, Grupo TFM filed suitKCSM operations in the Federal District Courtconsolidated results. Revenue growth in 2006 was 9% over 2005, including pro forma KCSM revenue for the full year in 2005.
Cash flows from operations increased to $267.5 million in 2006 compared with $178.8 million in 2005, an increase of Mexico City seeking, among other things,$88.7 million. Capital expenditures are a declaratory judgment interpreting whether Grupo TFM was obligated to honor its obligation under the Put Agreement, as the Mexican government had not made any effort to sell the TFM shares subjectsignificant use of cash flows annually due to the Put priorcapital intensive nature of railroad operations. Cash used for capital expenditures in 2006 was $241.8 million as compared to October 31, 2003. In its suit, Grupo TFM named Grupo TMM$275.7 million in 2005.
2007 Outlook.
Kansas City Southern expects to continue to integrate U.S. and KCS as additional interested parties. The Mexican government has provided Grupo TFMMexico operations and management with notice of its intention to sell its interest in TFM. Grupo TFM has responded toa focus on execution and realizing the Mexican government’s notice reaffirming its right and interest in purchasing the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM, but also advising the Mexican government that it would not take any action until its lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment was resolved. Grupo TFM has received an injunction, which blocks the Mexican government from exercising the Put. Following the resolution of the lawsuit in Mexico or the lifting of this injunction, in the event that Grupo TFM does not purchase the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM, Grupo TMM and KCS, or either of Grupo TMM or KCS alone, would, following notification by the Mexican government in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements, be obligated to purchase the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM. Based upon public disclosures made by Grupo TMM, it is not in a position to make this purchase. If the Acquisition is completed prior to the purchase of the Mexican government’s interest in TFM, KCS will be solely responsible for purchasing the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM. If KCS had been required to purchase this interest as of December 31, 2003, the total purchase price would have been approximately $467.7 million.

Value Added Tax (“VAT”) Lawsuit and VAT Contingency Payment under the Acquisition Agreement.The VAT lawsuit (“VAT Claim”), which has been pending in the Mexican courts since 1997, arose out of the Mexican Treasury’s delivery of a VAT credit certificate to a Mexican governmental agency rather than to TFM. The facefull value of the VATnetwork KCS has built. Consolidated revenue growth in 2007 is expected to be in line with 2005 — 2006 (including KCSM’s 2005 proforma results). Price increases and higher volume are expected to be key drivers of growth while KCS continues to position its network to increase length of haul and cross border traffic, where carload growth is expected to outpace economic growth and intermodal growth is expected to increase substantially.

With continued productivity increases in operations as well as the projected revenue growth, the full year operating ratio for 2007 is expected to fall below 80%; although, the Company believes seasonality of business will have an impact on the currentquarter-over-quarter improvement trends in the first half of the year.
The Company believes that liquidity will continue to improve as will the Company’s key credit at issue is 2,111,111,790 pesos orstatistics with anticipated improvements in operating income, continued focus on working capital reduction and other balance sheet opportunities.
The Company projects cash capital expenditures to maintain the railroad and meet anticipated future demand will be approximately $192$270 million in 2007. KCS also plans to acquire 150 new locomotives through operating lease arrangements at a cost of about $300 million. It is currently projected that U.S. dollars, based on current exchange rates. The amountoperations will take delivery of any recovery would, in accordance with Mexican law, reflect the face value of the VAT credit adjusted for inflation60 locomotives and interest accruals from 1997, with certain limitations.

After several Mexican Fiscal Court and Mexican appellate court rulings during 2002 and 2003, on January 19, 2004, TFM received a Special Certificate from the Mexican Federal Treasury in the amount of $2.1 billion pesos discussed above. The Special Certificate represents the refund of the value added tax paid, and may90 locomotives will be used by TFMin Mexico.

Panama Canal Railway, an equity investment of KCS, is also expected to satisfy any tax liabilities due. The Special Certificate delivered to TFM oncontinue strong growth in volumes and cash flow.


28


RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Preferred Stock Dividends.  On January 19, 2004 has the same face amount as the VAT refund claimed by TFM. TFM was served on January 20, 2004 with an official letter notifying TFM of the Mexican government’s preliminary findings and conclusions arising from its tax audit of TFM’s 1997 tax returns (“Tax Audit Summary”). In the Tax Audit Summary, the Mexican government notified TFM of its preliminary conclusion that the documentation provided by TFM in support of the VAT refund claim and depreciation of the TFM Concession title and the assets reported on TFM’s 1997 tax return do

not comply with the formalities required by the applicable tax legislation. The Tax Audit Summary also attached the Special Certificate pending resolution of the audit. TFM has advised that it has, within the time allowed by the Tax Audit Summary, contested the conclusions of the Mexican tax authorities, and it has filed a constitutional appeal against the Tax Audit Summary, alleging the process followed by the Mexican government violated TFM’s constitutional rights.TFM has also filed a complaint against the Mexican government, seeking to have the amount of the Special Certificate adjusted to reflect interest and penalties in accordance with Mexican law.

In addition, provided the Acquisition has occurred and neither KCS nor any of its subsidiaries has purchased the Mexican government’s TFM shares upon exercise of the Put, KCS will be obligated to pay to Grupo TMM an additional amount (referred to as the “VAT Contingency Payment”) of up to $180 million in cash in the event that the VAT Claim is successfully resolved and the amount received is greater than the purchase price of the Put. If the Acquisition is completed, KCS will assume Grupo TMM’s obligations to make any payment upon the exercise by the Mexican government of the Put and will indemnify Grupo TMM and its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees and shareholders, against obligations or liabilities relating thereto.

Because TFM has not recognized its claim as an asset for financial accounting purposes, any recovery by TFM would likely be recognized by TFM as income thereby favorably impacting the Company’s recognition of its equity in earnings in Grupo TFM. The Company is presently unable to predict the amount or timing of any VAT refund recovery. For further information with respect to the VAT refund claim, see Note 3 in the Notes to KCS’s Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Mexrail Transactions. On May 9, 2003, pursuant to the terms of a stock purchase agreement for KCS to acquire control of Mexrail (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), KCS acquired from Grupo TMM (through its subsidiary TFM) 51% of the shares of Mexrail for approximately $32.7 million. KCS deposited the Mexrail shares into a voting trust pending resolution of KCS’s application to the STB seeking authority to exercise common control over Tex-Mex, KCSR and Gateway Eastern. The Stock Purchase Agreement provided TFM the right to repurchase all of the Mexrail stock acquired by12, 2007, the Company at any time for the purchase price paid by the Company, subject to any STB orders or directions. In August 2003, KCS receiveddeclared a demand from TFM to repurchase those Mexrail shares. In September 2003, the STB issued a decision finding no need to rulecash dividend on the transfer back to TFM of the 51% interest in Mexrail that KCS acquired. The repurchase of Mexrail by TFM closed on September 30, 2003 returning 100% ownership of Mexrail to TFM and the Stock Purchase Agreement automatically terminated. The repurchase price was $32.7 million; the same price KCS paid TFM in May 2003. The Stock Purchase Agreement, however, provided that in the event TFM reacquired the Mexrail shares from KCS, the parties to the Stock Purchase Agreement intended the terms and conditions of a February 27, 2002 stock purchase agreement under which TFM acquired the Mexrail shares, the Grupo TFM bylaws and the shareholders agreement dated May 1997 to become again valid and fully enforceable against the parties to such agreements.

Under the February 27, 2002 stock purchase agreement, KCS retained rights to prevent further sale or transfer of the stock or significant assets of Mexrail and Tex-Mex and the right to continue to participate in the corporate governance of Mexrail and Tex-Mex, which will remain U.S. corporations and subject to KCS’s super majority rights contained in Grupo TFM’s bylaws.

STB Review Status. KCS filed with the STB a Railroad Control Application, seeking permission to exercise common control over KCSR, Gateway Eastern and Tex-Mex. The STB issued its decision, effective June 13, 2003, finding that the transaction proposed in KCS’s application is a “minor transaction” under 49 CFR 1180.2(c), although KCS was required to supplement its application as discussed in the decision, to address some of the implications of KCS’s acquisition of control of TFM. The STB also outlined a procedural schedule for consideration of KCS’s application to exercise common control over KCSR, Gateway Eastern and Tex-Mex. The STB has issued an order suspending the procedural schedule pending a resolution of the uncertainties that now surround KCS’s efforts to acquire control of Tex-Mex, and requiring KCS to file status reports regarding developments in its efforts to acquire control of TFM and Tex-Mex.

Notice of Termination of Joint Venture Agreement.KCS acknowledged receipt from Grupo TMM of a notice to terminate the joint venture agreement between the parties entered into in 1995. Pursuant to such notice, the joint venture agreement terminated on December 1, 2003. The joint venture agreement between the parties provided that upon its termination, the joint venture would be liquidated and any assets held in the name of the joint venture would be distributed proportionally to KCS and Grupo TMM. There are no significant assets held by the joint venture and its termination has not had a material adverse effect on KCS.

4.25% Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. On May 5, 2003,stock, series C (“Series C Preferred Stock”) and a stock dividend on the Company completed the sale of $200 million of Redeemable5.125% Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series CD (“ConvertibleSeries D Preferred Stock”) withfor dividends in arrears that were due May 15, 2006, August 15, 2006 and November 15, 2006, and the dividend payment due February 15, 2007. The dividend was paid February 15, 2007, to stockholders of record on February 5, 2007. The Company also declared a liquidation preference of $500 per share in a private offering. The Convertiblecash dividend on the 4%, noncumulative Preferred Stock, offering was made only by meanspayable April 3, 2007, to stockholders of an offering memorandum pursuantrecord on March 12, 2007.

Consent Solicitation.  On January 29, 2007, KCSR commenced a consent solicitation to Rule 144A. Dividends onamend the Convertible Preferred Stock are cumulativeindentures under which KCSR’s 91/2% Senior Notes due 2008 (“91/2% Notes”) and are payable quarterly at an annual rate of 4.25%71/2% Senior Notes due 2009 (“71/2% Notes” and together with the 91/2% Notes, the “Notes”) were issued. The purpose of the liquidation preference, when, as and if declared byconsent solicitation was to (i) resolve an inconsistency in the Company’s Boardinclusion of Directors. Accumulated unpaid dividends will cumulate dividends atcertain expenses, but not the same rate as dividends cumulate onincome, of restricted subsidiaries in the Convertible Preferred Stock. Each sharecalculation of the Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible,consolidated coverage ratio under the indentures, (ii) amend the definition of refinancing indebtedness to allow the inclusion of certain conditions,related premiums, interest, fees and subjectexpenses in permitted refinancing indebtedness and (iii) obtain waivers of any defaults arising from certain actions taken in the absence of such proposed amendments. On February 5, 2007, KCSR obtained the requisite consents from the holders of each series of Notes to adjustmentamend their respective indentures as described above and executed supplemental indentures containing such amendments and waivers.
Credit Facility Waiver.  On January 31, 2007, KCS provided written notice to the lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement of certain conditions, into 33.4728 sharesrepresentation and other defaults under the 2006 Credit Agreement arising from the potential defaults which existed under the KCSR indentures as described above. These defaults limited KCSR’s access to the revolving credit facility. In its notice of the Company’s common stock. On or after May 20, 2008,default, the Company will havealso requested that the option to redeem any orlenders waive these defaults. On February 5, 2007 the Company received a waiver of such defaults from all of the Convertible Preferred Stock,lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement. The Company is currently not in default of the 2006 Credit Agreement and has access to the revolving credit facility.
Claims Asserted under the TMM Acquisition Agreement.  As part of the acquisition of Grupo KCSM in 2005, KCS issued escrow notes to TMM totaling $47.0 million which are subject to reduction for certain conditions. Under certain circumstances, at the optionpotential losses related to incorrect representations and warranties or breaches of the holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company may be required to purchase shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock from the holders. The Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of a holder onlycovenants in the event of a “fundamental change,” which is defined as “any transaction or event (whetherAcquisition Agreement by means of an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer, consolidation, merger, combination, reclassification, recapitalization or otherwise) in connection with which all or substantially all of the Company’s common stock is exchangedTMM. On January 29, 2007, KCS advised TMM that KCS intended to assert claims for converted into, acquired for or constitutes solely the right to receive common stock that is not listed on a United States national securities exchange or approved for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market or similar system. The practical effect of this provision is to limit the Company’s ability to eliminate a holder’s ability to convert the Convertible Preferred Stock into common shares of a publicly traded security through a merger or consolidation transaction. In no other circumstances is the Company potentially obligated to redeem the Convertible Preferred Stock for cash. Accordingly, since the Company is in a position to control whether the Company experiences a “fundamental change,” the Convertible Preferred Stock is classified as permanent equity capital.

A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Convertible Preferred Stock has been used to repay debt. The remainder of the net proceeds from the offering of the Convertible Preferred Stock are expected to be used to pay a portion ofindemnification under the Acquisition or further reduce debt. IfAgreement related to representations and warranties made by TMM. On February 1, 2007, KCS received a notice from TMM indicating that TMM would seek damages from KCS under the Acquisition wereAgreement, aggregating approximately $43 million as well as other unspecified damages. The parties are obligated under the Acquisition Agreement to attempt to resolve their differences informally and, if not successful, then to be completed, the Company would explore alternative uses for the remainder of the net proceeds realized from the issuance of the Convertible Preferred Stock.

On August, 1, 2003, KCS filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement with the SECsubmit them to register for resale by the holders the Convertible Preferred Stock and the common stock into which such preferred stock may be converted. On October 24, 2003, this Registration Statement, as amended, was declared effective by the SEC. KCS has filed, and will continue to file, post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement as required by applicable rules and regulations. KCS will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the securities under this Registration Statement, as amended.

binding arbitration.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2006, Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2005
Net Income.  Consolidated net income increased $139.9 million excluding the 2005 non-recurringVAT/Put settlement for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005. Including the $131.9 million VAT/Put settlement in 2005, consolidated net income increased $8 million. Operating income increased by $242.0 million primarily driven by targeted price increases and fuel surcharge, new and expanded existing business in both the U.S. and Mexico segments, and the integration of KCSM operations and a full year of consolidated operating results. Operating expenses increased by only 5% due to increased efficiencies from the integration of KCSM.


29


The following table sets forth certainsummarizes the consolidated income statement components of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively, for use KCS(in the discussion below. See the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for other captions not presented within this table.

   2003

  2002

  2001

 
   (dollars in millions) 

Revenues

  $581.3  $566.2  $583.2 

Operating expenses

   552.2   518.2   527.8 
   


 


 


Operating income

   29.1   48.0   55.4 

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   11.0   43.4   27.1 

Gain on sale of Mexrail

   —     4.4   —   

Interest expense

   (46.4)  (45.0)  (52.8)

Debt retirement costs

   —     (4.3)  —   

Other income

   6.8   17.6   4.2 
   


 


 


Income before income taxes

   0.5   64.1   33.9 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (2.8)  6.9   2.8 
   


 


 


Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

   3.3   57.2   31.1 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes

   8.9   —     (0.4)
   


 


 


Net income

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7 
   


 


 


millions).

                 
        Change 
  2006  2005  Dollars  Percent 
 
Revenues $1,659.7  $1,352.0  $307.7   23%
Operating expenses  1,355.4   1,289.7   65.7   5%
                 
Operating income  304.3   62.3   242.0   388%
Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates  7.3   2.9   4.4   152%
Interest expense  (167.2)  (133.5)  (33.7)  25%
VAT/Put settlement gain, net     131.9   (131.9)  (100)%
Other income  10.2   12.4   (2.2)  (18)%
                 
Income before income taxes and minority interest  154.6   76.0   78.6   103%
Income tax provision (benefit)  45.4   (7.1)  52.5   (739)%
                 
Income before minority interest  109.2   83.1   26.1   31%
Minority interest  0.3   (17.8)  18.1   (102)%
                 
Net income $108.9  $100.9  $8.0   8%
                 
U.S. Segment.
Revenues.The following table summarizes consolidated KCSU.S. revenues including the revenues (in millions)and carloadcarloads statistics of KCSR for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, respectively.(in thousands).  Certain prior year amountsperiod carloads and intermodal units have been reclassified to reflect changes in the business groups and to conform to the current period presentation.
                                 
  Revenues  Carloads and Intermodal Units 
        Change        Change 
  2006  2005  Dollars  Percent  2006  2005  Units  Percent 
 
General commodities:
                                
Chemical and petroleum $173.5  $153.5  $20.0   13%  158.8   155.7   3.1   2%
Forest products and metals  241.2   219.0   22.2   10%  199.0   211.7   (12.7)  (6)%
Agricultural and mineral  198.2   179.2   19.0   11%  170.1   183.1   (13.0)  (7)%
                                 
Total general commodities  612.9   551.7   61.2   11%  527.9   550.5   (22.6)  (4)%
Intermodal and automotive  74.8   76.6   (1.8)  (2)%  339.4   335.9   3.5   1%
Coal  141.0   122.3   18.7   15%  255.9   233.4   22.5   10%
                                 
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units  828.7   750.6   78.1   10%  1,123.2   1,119.8   3.4   0%
                                 
Other revenue  57.0   53.8   3.2   6%                
                                 
Total revenues $885.7  $804.4  $81.3   10%                
                                 
For the year presentation.

   Revenues

  Carloads and
Intermodal Units


   2003

  2002

  2001

  2003

  2002

  2001

   (dollars in millions)  (in thousands)

General commodities:

                     

Chemical and petroleum

  $123.8  $130.7  $124.8  140.0  145.4  147.8

Paper and forest

   146.1   134.8   129.1  186.2  178.2  182.2

Agricultural and mineral

   108.5   97.2   93.8  140.6  126.5  125.7
   

  

  

  
  
  

Total general commodities

   378.4   362.7   347.7  466.8  450.1  455.7

Intermodal and automotive

   59.1   59.9   69.1  310.5  287.4  299.8

Coal

   92.7   101.2   118.7  191.4  210.0  202.3
   

  

  

  
  
  

Carload revenues and carload

                     

and intermodal units

   530.2   523.8   535.5  968.7  947.5  957.8
               
  
  

Other rail-related revenues

   45.1   37.9   39.4         
   

  

  

         

Total KCSR revenues

   575.3   561.7   574.9         

Other subsidiary revenues

   6.0   4.5   8.3         
   

  

  

         

Total consolidated revenues

  $581.3  $566.2  $583.2         
   

  

  

         

ended December 31, 2006, revenues increased $81.3 million compared to the prior year. The U.S. segment experienced revenue increases in all commodity groups except for the intermodal and automotive business, which decreased slightly due to a decline in automotive business driven by lower output and short term plant shutdowns in 2006. Overall increases in the majority of the commodities were driven by targeted price improvements, including increased fuel surcharges. The following tablediscussion provides an analysis of revenues by commodity group.

Chemical and Petroleum.  Revenues increased for all of the chemical and petroleum products for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to targeted rate increases in the petroleum, agricultural chemicals and industrial gases sectors, and increased traffic volumes. Pricing improvement and stronger economic conditions during 2006 accounted for a majority of the growth in revenue in the year, while growth in the third and fourth quarters also reflected the Gulf Coast refineries’ recovery from the past year’s hurricanes.


30


Forest Products and Metals.  Revenues increased in forest products and metal commodities for the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to targeted rate increases. Decreases in volume can be attributed to the lumber and chip products due to rising mortgage rates. This volume decline was only partially offset by increases in volume from higher production in the metals, rolled paper and military products.
Agricultural and Mineral.  Revenues increased in all agricultural and mineral products for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to targeted rate adjustments and an increase in velocity over certain corridors and business sectors. Overall improvement in velocity of unit grain and mineral trains accounted for a majority of the revenue growth during 2006. Declining market conditions during the third and fourth quarters of the year accounted for the decline in volume with the primary decrease in export grain.
Intermodal and Automotive.  Revenues decreased in the intermodal and automotive business for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to declines in the automotive business from suspended production at an automotive plant for a majority of the year. This decrease was offset partially by increased revenues in the intermodal business which were driven by higher volumes from existing customers as well as the generation of new intermodal business.
Coal.  Revenues increased for the year ended December 31, 2006, as a result of higher traffic volumes at certain electric generating stations in order to rebuild inventory stockpiles. The ability to rebuild stockpiles has been made possible by improved efficiencies at the coal mines and increased velocity achieved by KCSR and origin carriers.
Operating Expenses.  For the year ended December 31, 2006, U.S. operating expenses increased $0.8 million. The following summarizes consolidated KCSthe Company’s U.S. operating expenses(in millions).
                 
        Change 
  2006  2005  Dollars  Percent 
 
Compensation and benefits $264.3  $244.8  $19.5   8%
Purchased services  82.8   84.6   (1.8)  (2)%
Fuel  140.8   123.8   17.0   14%
Equipment costs  82.7   68.9   13.8   20%
Depreciation and amortization  65.7   60.0   5.7   10%
Casualties and insurance  44.9   88.7   (43.8)  (49)%
Other  78.9   88.5   (9.6)  (11)%
                 
Total operating expenses $760.1  $759.3  $0.8   0%
                 
Compensation and benefits.  Compensation and benefits expense increased $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005 as the result of increased incentive compensation, annual salary increases, increase in management headcount, and an increase in stock based compensation. Incentive compensation is tied to the financial results of the Company and accounted for $9.3 million of the increase. Stock based compensation increased by $2.9 million partially as a result of the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R). Additionally, the remaining increase is the result of annual salary increases and certain increases in headcount.
Purchased services.  Purchased services expense decreased $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases in legal costs, locomotive repair costs and rental income received on locomotives leased to Mexico operations on a short-term basis. The decreases were offset by increases in joint facilities expenses due to higher traffic and an increase in auto and truck repair expense.
Fuel.  Fuel expense increased $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005 primarily as a result of a 7.9% increase in the average price per gallon and a 7.2% increase in consumption.
Equipment costs.  Equipment costs increased $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005 as a result of entering into two new locomotive lease agreements for $14.8 million and new


31


freight car leases for $4.5 million during the year. This increase was offset by a decrease in car hire expense due to a reduction in the use of non-KCSR freight cars.
Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005, primarily as a result of an increase in assets placed into service during the year. This increase was partially offset by an updated depreciation study which was completed during the year and resulted in a $3.0 million reduction in expense in the 4th quarter.
Casualties and insurance.  Casualties and insurance expense decreased $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005. During the third quarter of 2005, the Company recorded a $37.8 million pre-tax charge for personal injury liabilities based upon an actuarial study in 2005. The remaining decrease in 2006 was primarily driven by a lower number of incidence as well as a decrease in the severity of derailments during the year compared to the prior year.
Other.  Other expense decreased $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005 primarily due to a $13.9 million reimbursement from the Mexico segment for shared service expenses paid by the U.S. segment during 2006. This was offset by an increase of $6.7 million in materials and supplies primarily as a result of price increases in freight car wheels.
Mexico Segment.
KCS acquired a controlling interest in Grupo KCSM effective April 1, 2005. The 2005 results reflect charges and costs associated with the acquisition and integration, as well as the effect of valuation adjustments as required by purchase accounting. Since April 1, 2005, the financial results of Grupo KCSM have been consolidated into KCS. Prior to that date, the investment for Grupo KCSM was accounted for under the equity method. Although not consolidated prior to April 1, 2005, revenue and expense information below includes Grupo KCSM results for the 1st quarter of 2005 for comparative purposes. Accounting policies for Grupo KCSM prior to the acquisition were materially consistent with U.S. operations, however, certain adjustments have been made to the results presented for comparability.
Revenues.  Mexico’s revenues(in millions)and carloads statistics(in thousands)follow.
                                 
  Revenues  Carloads and Intermodal Units 
     Comparative
  Change     Comparative
  Change 
  2006  2005  Dollars  Percent  2006  2005  Units  Percent 
 
General commodities:
                                
Chemical and petroleum $145.9  $126.5  $19.4   15%  102.0   97.0   5.0   5%
Forest products and metals  213.0   186.2   26.8   14%  187.5   197.3   (9.8)  (5)%
Agricultural and mineral  232.7   219.2   13.5   6%  196.0   200.1   (4.1)  (2)%
                                 
Total general commodities  591.6   531.9   59.7   11%  485.5   494.4   (8.9)  (2)%
Intermodal and automotive  162.4   173.0   (10.6)  (6)%  312.0   326.8   (14.8)  (5)%
                                 
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units  754.0   704.9   49.1   7%  797.5   821.2   (23.7)  (3)%
                                 
Other revenue  20.0   12.7   7.3   57%                
                                 
Total revenues $774.0  $717.6  $56.4   8%                
                                 
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 totaled $774.0 million compared to $717.6 million for the comparable year ended December 31, 2005, which represented an increase of $56.4 million. Revenues increased despite a decrease in carloads mainly due to a reduction in the movement in finished vehicles for exportation. The increase in 2006 was mainly attributable to targeted rate increases and fuel surcharge. Carloads are a standard measure used by KCS to determine the volume of traffic transported over its rail lines. Imports into Mexico from the U.S., Canada and overseas represented approximately 56.3% and 56.2% of total revenues in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Approximately 77.8% of total revenues in 2006 were attributable to international freight.


32


Chemical and Petroleum Products.  Revenues rose $19.4 million in 2006 primarily due to price increases, fuel surcharge revenue and volume increases over the prior year. The volume recovery increase was largely attributable to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita which had adversely impacted the Gulf coast refineries. Volume recovery was seen in fuel oil, diesel, gasoline and pet coke during 2006.
Forest Products and Metals.  Revenues increased $26.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to price strategies, longer hauls and increased fuel surcharge. Targeted rate increases were implemented in 2006 for movements of steel slabs and steel coil imports. Increased revenue was seen from longer hauls to Laredo as a result of a customer’s relocation of its distribution center from Zacatecas to Tuxtepec. Increases in the number of cross border paper imports were seen during the year as well.
Agriculture and Mineral.  Revenues from agricultural products increased $13.5 million compared to 2005 primarily as a result of targeted rate increases and fuel surcharges. Volume increases in corn and sugar were partially offset by reductions in import shipments of soybeans, sorghum and wheat products. Revenues also grew due to an embargo on Ferromex lines. There was also increased activity during the last quarter of 2006 not expected to be imported through theU.S.-Mexico border. The fructose market increased and it is still growing without quotas on imports. The revenue increase has been favorable with movements of grain and products from U.S. origin to destinations on the KCSM lines. These increases were negatively affected by a reduction of volumes of sand and clay products, and lower traffic in route from Jaltipan to Queretaro, due to dwell times at Ferrovalle. Additionally revenues were also affected by the reduction in consumption of limestone in Lázaro Cárdenas during the second quarter 2006.
Intermodal and Automotive.  Intermodal revenue increased $7.8 million during 2006 compared to 2005, as a result of increased numbers of steamship carriers that call at the port of Lázaro Cárdenas and consistent transit times on Intermodal trains. Automotive revenue decreased $18.4 million in 2006 compared to 2005, as a result of a reduction in the movement of finished vehicles for exportation to the U.S. and Canadian markets. Additionally, the movements of importation of finished vehicles, as well as the domestic distribution of these vehicles, have declined due to the logistics of their transportation.
Operating Expenses.  The following summarizes Mexico operating expenses(in millions):
                 
     Comparative  Change 
  2006  2005  Dollars  Percent 
 
Compensation and benefits $123.4  $124.4  $(1.0)  (1)%
Purchased services  131.0   145.5   (14.5)  (10)%
Fuel  112.8   106.3   6.5   6%
Equipment costs  97.0   102.5   (5.5)  (5)%
Depreciation and amortization  89.3   88.9   0.4   0%
Casualties and insurance  8.5   17.0   (8.5)  (50)%
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing  5.9   41.6   (35.7)  (86)%
Other  27.4   47.3   (19.9)  (42)%
                 
Total operating expenses $595.3  $673.5  $(78.2)  (12)%
                 
Compensation and benefits.  For the year ended December 31, 2006, salaries, wages and employee benefits decreased $1.0 million compared to 2005. The decrease reflects a reduction in headcount and the depreciation effect of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar during 2006. This decrease was partially offset by the annual salaries increase and the increase in wages and fringe benefits resulting from labor negotiations in July 2006.
Purchased services.  Purchased services decreased $14.5 million in 2006 compared to 2005. Certain trackage rights that were not used during 2006 resulting in lower costs, amortization of deferred credits established in connection with the push down of purchase accounting, and additional capitalization of certain overhead costs, reduced purchased services during the year. These decreases were slightly offset by increases in management and professional fees during 2006.


33


Fuel.  Fuel expenses increased $6.5 million in 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due to the volatility of fuel prices during 2006. KCSM’s average price per gallon for fuel increased 4.6% in 2006 as compared to the prior year.
Equipment cost.  Equipment cost decreased $5.5 million compared to 2005. This decrease was attributed mainly to a reduction in the use of non-KCSM freight cars as a result of velocity and operations improvement. This decrease was partially offset by the amortization of certain deferred charges and credits established in connection with the push down of purchase accounting related to the fair value of operating leases for freight cars.
Casualties and insurance.  During 2006, casualties and insurance decreased $8.5 million compared to 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of lower costs associated with derailments compared to activity that occurred during the second and third quarter of 2005.
Employees’ statutory profit sharing.  The $35.7 million decrease in employee statutory profit sharing expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 was a result of four Supreme Court decisions in May of last year which denied the deductibility of NOL’s in a company’s profit sharing liability calculation. As a result of these court rulings the deferred profit sharing asset associated with these NOL’s was written down during 2005, which resulted in a non-cash charge to income of $35.6 million.
Other.  Other expenses decreased $19.9 million compared to December 31, 2005. This decrease primarily reflects lower bad debt expense as compared to 2005 of approximately $9.3 million, the recognition of transition cost of $2.0 million in 2005, a charge due to the revaluation of the inventory parts associated with the maintenance of the catenary line in the second quarter 2005 of $1.6 million and losses on sale of property prior to adoption of the group method of depreciation on April 1, 2005, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in other leases.
Consolidated Non-Operating Expenses.
Consolidated Interest Expense.  Consolidated interest expense increased $33.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, driven primarily by the additional three months of KCSM interest expense. KCSM’s interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was $27.4 million. The remaining difference was due to higher average balances of and increased interest rates on floating rate debt in the current year.
Consolidated Debt Retirement Costs.  Consolidated debt retirement costs increased $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006, KCSR entered into an amended and restated credit agreement and wrote off $2.2 million and KCSM refinanced its 10.25% senior notes and wrote off $2.6 million in unamortized debt issuance costs. For the year ended December 31, 2005, $4.4 million in unamortized debt issuance costs were written off in connection with the refinancing of KCSM’s 11.75% debentures and its first amended and restated credit agreement.
Foreign Exchange.  For the year ended December 31, 2006, the foreign exchange loss of $3.7 million compared to a gain of $3.5 million for the same period in 2005. During the year 2006 the U.S. dollar appreciated approximately 1.7% relative to the Mexican peso.
Equity in Net Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Affiliates.  Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates was $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Significant components of this change follow:
• Equity in losses from the operations of PCRC was $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2005. The decrease in losses of $.7 million is the result of a 13.1% increase in volume.
• Equity in earnings of Southern Capital was $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, versus $2.8 million for the same period in 2005. The $2.6 million increase in earnings is the result of a reduction in depreciation expense as a majority of the locomotives owned by Southern Capital became fully depreciated during the year.


34


• KCSM’s equity in earnings of FTVM was $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2005.
• Equity in losses of KCSM was $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Other Income.  Other income increased $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to the sale of land and other long term assets that were not associated with KCS’s railroad operations during 2006.
Consolidated Income Tax Provision (Benefit).  For the year ended December 31, 2006, KCS’ income tax expense was $45.4 million, a change of $52.5 million as compared to a $7.1 million benefit for the year ended December 31, 2005. The effective tax rate increased from (9.3%) to 29.4% for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,2005 and 2001,2006, respectively.

   2003

  2002

  2001

   (dollars in millions)

Compensation and benefits

  $197.8  $197.8  $192.9

Depreciation and amortization

   64.3   61.4   58.0

Purchased services

   63.5   59.6   57.0

Operating leases

   57.2   55.0   56.8

Casualties and insurance

   56.4   25.2   42.1

Fuel

   47.4   38.4   43.9

Car hire

   10.0   19.7   19.8

Other

   55.6   61.1   57.3
   

  

  

Total operating expenses

  $552.2  $518.2  $527.8
   

  

  

This increase was primarily attributable to the absence of one-time items such as the non-taxable VAT/Put settlement which occurred in 2005 and the 2005 write-off of deferred profit sharing in Mexico.

Following the acquisition of control of Grupo KCSM in 2005, the Company has not provided U.S. federal income taxes on the undistributed earnings of Grupo KCSM since the Company intends to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the United States.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBERYear Ended December 31, 2003 COMPARED WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER2005, Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 20022004

Net Income.  Consolidated net income for 2005 increased $76.5 million compared to 2004 primarily as a result of a $131.9 million gain resulting from the VAT/Put Settlement, partially offset by a reduction in operating income of $21.2 million. Additionally, consolidated net income increased due to a reduction in provision for income taxes of $30.7 million.
The reduction in consolidated operating income was driven primarily by an additional $37.8 million charge in 2005 to recognize additional costs related to occupational and personal injury claims determined as a result of the annual actuarial study, which was completed during the third quarter of 2005, and the write off of KCSM’s deferred tax asset related to statutory profit sharing. On a consolidated basis, both revenues and operating expenses were significantly impacted by the acquisitions completed during the year. In addition to the acquisitions, revenue growth for 2005 continued to be driven by increased volume, targeted rate increases and increased fuel surcharges to help offset rising fuel prices. Consolidated operating costs generally increased consistent with the volume increases, although price increases also impacted compensation and benefits and fuel expense.
The following table summarizes the consolidated income statement components of KCS(in millions).  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect changes to the current period presentation.
                 
        Change 
  2005  2004  Dollars  Percent 
 
Revenues $1,352.0  $639.5  $712.5   111%
Operating expenses  1,289.7   556.0   733.7   132%
                 
Operating income  62.3   83.5   (21.2)  (25)%
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates  2.9   (4.5)  7.4   (164)%
Interest expense  (133.5)  (44.4)  (89.1)  201%
VAT/Put settlement gain, net  131.9      131.9    
Other income  12.4   13.4   (1.0)  (7)%
                 
Income before income taxes and minority interest  76.0   48.0   28.0   58%
Income tax provision (benefit)  (7.1)  23.6   (30.7)  (130)%
                 
Income before minority interest  83.1   24.4   58.7   241%
Minority interest  (17.8)     (17.8)   
                 
Net income $100.9  $24.4  $76.5   314%
                 


35


U.S. Segment.
Revenues.  The following table summarizes U.S. revenues, including the revenues and separate carload statistics of KCSR, and Mexrail, for the year ended December 31, 2005(in millions).For the year ended December 31, 2003, net income declined $45.0 million2004, the revenue and carload statistics are KCSR only. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to $12.2 million (10¢ per diluted share) from $57.2 million (91¢ per diluted share) forconform to the current period presentation.
                                 
  Revenues  Carloads and Intermodal Units 
        Change        Change 
  2005  2004  Dollars  Percent  2005  2004  Units  Percent 
 
General commodities:
                                
Chemical and petroleum $153.5  $135.0  $18.5   14%  155.7   147.9   7.8   5%
Forest products and metals  219.0   169.6   49.4   29%  211.7   197.3   14.4   7%
Agricultural and mineral  179.2   125.2   54.0   43%  183.1   149.4   33.7   23%
                                 
Total general commodities  551.7   429.8   121.9   28%  550.5   494.6   55.9   11%
Intermodal and automotive  76.6   66.8   9.8   15%  335.9   342.8   (6.9)  (2)%
Coal  122.3   92.1   30.2   33%  233.4   194.7   38.7   20%
                                 
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units  750.6   588.7   161.9   28%  1,119.8   1,032.1   87.7   8%
                                 
Other revenue  53.8   50.8   3.0   6%                
                                 
Total revenues $804.4  $639.5  $164.9   26%                
                                 
For the year ended December 31, 2002. This year over year decline in net income resulted from a $33.52005, U.S. revenues increased $164.9 million. The Mexrail acquisition accounted for $73.3 million decrease in equity in earnings of Grupo TFM, a $34.0 millionthe increase in operating expenses (mostly related to increases in casualty and fuel expenses as discussed further below), a $10.8 million decline in other income and a $1.4 million increase in interest expense. Also contributing to the comparably lower 2003 net income was the impact of a $4.4 million gain on the sale of Mexrail recorded in 2002. These factors, which led to a decline in net income, were partially offset by a $15.1 million increase in revenue, a $9.7 million decrease in the provision for income taxes, a benefit of $8.9 million (net of income taxes of $5.6 million) reported during 2003 relating to the cumulative effect of an accounting change, the effect of $4.3 million in debt retirement costs reported in 2002 and a $1.1 million improvement in the equity in net losses of other unconsolidated affiliates (PCRC and Southern Capital).

Net income available to common shareholders declined $50.7 million to $6.3 million in 2003 compared to $57.0 million in 2002, due to the $45.0 million reduction in net income and a $5.7 million increase in preferred stock dividends. The increase in preferred stock dividends resulted from dividends earned related to the issuance of $200 million of Convertible Preferred Stock during 2003 (see “Recent Developments—Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock” for further information). The Convertible Preferred Stock accumulates dividends at an annual rate of 4.25%, which equates to a total of $8.5 million in annual dividend payments. During 2003, approximately $5.7 million of dividends relating to the Convertible Preferred Stock were earned, thereby reducing the net income available to the common shareholders. The assumed conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock would have had an anti-dilutive effect on the diluted earnings per share calculation, and thus, were excluded from the weighted average common shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share.

Revenues. Consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 20032005. U.S. revenue also experienced increases in all commodity groups due to a combination of higher carloadings, targeted price improvements and increased $15.1fuel surcharge revenue. Fuel surcharges increased to $52.0 million, which accounted for $35.3 million of the increase in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. The following discussion provides an analysis of the segment’s revenues by commodity group. Pending completion of the ongoing effort to change the Tex-Mex mark and finalize its merger into KCS operations, carload data are presented based on the combination of the carloads for KCSR and Mexrail, without elimination for cars interchanged between the two roads.

Chemical and Petroleum.  For the year ended December 31, 2005, U.S. chemical and petroleum products experienced increases in revenues in all commodity groups with the exception of inorganic chemicals. These increases were attributed to higher production, certain targeted rate increases and fuel surcharges. These revenue increases were partially offset by the effects of plant and production shutdowns resulting from the hurricanes during the second half of 2005. The impact of the Mexrail consolidation increased revenues $12.1 million in the chemical and petroleum product commodities for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Forest Products and Metals.  For the year ended December 31, 2005, forest products and metals revenue for the U.S. segment experienced growth in all commodities compared to the same period in 2004. For the year to date period, these increases resulted primarily from certain targeted rate increases and fuel surcharges partially offset by the impact of hurricanes in the 3rd quarter of 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the consolidation of Mexrail contributed $19.0 million to $581.3forest products and metals revenue.
Agricultural and Mineral.  U.S. revenues in the agricultural and mineral products business unit increased for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increases were primarily the result of targeted rate increases and fuel surcharges. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2005, all commodities, except grain, experienced increased traffic due to increased production. U.S. segment domestic grain carloads decreased, primarily due to a slowdown in equipment cycle times resulting in lower equipment availability for the year while the impact of local harvests moving to local feed mills reduced traffic in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Export grain carloads decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in gulf coast export traffic including the effects of hurricane weather in the gulf coast region. For the year ended


36


December 31, 2005, the consolidation of Mexrail contributed $30.7 million to agricultural and mineral products revenue.
Intermodal and Automotive.  Revenue for the U.S. segment intermodal and automotive commodity group for the year ended December 31, 2005, increased $9.8 million compared to $566.2the same period in 2004. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Mexrail, intermodal traffic declined for the year ended December 31, 2005. The declines were the result of changes in shipper traffic patterns as well as the effects of hurricane weather during the third quarter of 2005. Automotive traffic decreased as a result of decreased volumes from manufacturers for the year ended December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the consolidation of Mexrail contributed $5.5 million to intermodal and automotive products revenue.
Coal.  Increases in U.S. segment coal revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004 were due primarily to the addition of two new coal customers that were previously served by other railroads, certain targeted rate increases related to renegotiated contracts and overall increases in carloadings and traffic volumes at certain electric generating stations in response to demand. Mexrail has no significant coal revenues.
Operating Expenses.  For the year ended December 31, 2005, U.S. operating expenses increased $203.3 million (36.6%), when compared to the same period in 2004. Of this increase, $83.3 million was attributable to the consolidation of Mexrail’s operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. The following table summarizes U.S. operating expenses of KCSR and Mexrail for the year ended December 31, 2005(in millions).  For the year ended December 31, 2004, the operating expenses are KCSR only.
                 
        Change 
  2005  2004  Dollars  Percent 
 
Compensation and benefits $244.8  $213.0  $31.8   15%
Purchased services  84.6   62.3   22.3   36%
Fuel  123.8   66.4   57.4   86%
Equipment costs  68.9   50.4   18.5   37%
Depreciation and amortization  60.0   53.5   6.5   12%
Casualties and insurance  88.7   42.4   46.3   109%
Other  88.5   68.0   20.5   30%
                 
Total operating expenses $759.3  $556.0  $203.3   37%
                 
Compensation and benefits.  Increases in compensation and benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004 were primarily the result of annual wage and salary rate increases which were effective July 1, 2004, as well as higher employee counts. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the consolidation of Mexrail added $19.4 million to compensation and benefits expense. The average headcount for the year ended December 31, 2005, was approximately 3,060 compared to approximately 2,740 for the same period in 2004, including an increase of employees as a result of the consolidation of Mexrail.
Purchased services.  Purchased services expense for the year ended December 31, 2005, increased compared to the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of the consolidation of Mexrail’s operations. Mexrail has historically contracted for services in the maintenance of equipment and way and structures. Accordingly, Mexrail contributed $19.7 million to purchased services expense for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Fuel.  Fuel expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was the result of a 50.5% increase in the average price per gallon, as well as a 26.0% increase in consumption. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the consolidation of Mexrail added $11.9 million to fuel expense.
Equipment costs.  Equipment costs for the year ended December 31, 2005, increased compared to the same period in 2004. Of this increase, $15.2 million was related to the Mexrail acquisition for the year ended


37


December 31, 2005. Excluding the impact of the Mexrail acquisition, equipment costs increased for the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily as a result of increased equipment lease costs related to higher traffic levels and demand.
Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2005, increased compared to the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of a higher asset base, partially offset by property retirements. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the consolidation of Mexrail added $3.5 million to depreciation and amortization expense.
Casualties and insurance.  During the third quarter of 2005, the Company recorded a $37.8 million pre-tax charge reflecting changes in its estimates for the cost of personal injury claims, which includes $7.5 million related to the Company’s first actuarial estimate of the cost of incurred but not reported occupational illness claims. The charge was recorded in “Casualties and Insurance” expense. The majority of the increases for FELA and third party claims are attributable to adverse experience versus the study, including an increase in the number of new claims and adverse developments in the dollar amount of claims and potential settlements for many significant prior claims. Increase related to occupational illness claims resulted primarily from a first time actuarial study. The Company is continuing its practice of accruing monthly for estimated claim costs at levels recommended by the actuarial study, and those accruals have been increased accordingly.
Mexico Segment.
KCS acquired a controlling interest in KCSM effective April 1, 2005. The nine month period ended December 31, 2005, results reflect charges and costs associated with the acquisition and integration, as well as the effect of valuation adjustments as required by purchase accounting. Management evaluates the results of its Mexico operations based on its operating performance during the current year and comparison to plan.
Revenues.  The following table summarizes consolidated Mexico revenues, including the revenues(in millions)and carloads statistics(in thousands), for the nine month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Although not consolidated in previous years, revenue recognition policies for the Mexico operations were consistent with those of U.S. operations in all material respects; therefore, commodity statistics are presented for purposes of comparison. Unaudited results for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 are presented for comparative purposes.
                                 
  Revenues  Carloads and Intermodal Units 
        Change        Change 
  2005  2004  Dollars  Percent  2005  2004  Units  Percent 
 
General commodities:
                                
Chemical and petroleum $94.5  $94.7  $(0.2)  (0)%  71.4   76.5   (5.1)  (7)%
Forest products and metals  141.5   120.5   21.0   17%  147.3   143.3   4.0   3%
Agricultural and mineral  168.9   158.6   10.3   6%  152.4   162.1   (9.7)  (6)%
                                 
Total general commodities  404.9   373.8   31.1   8%  371.1   381.9   (10.8)  (3)%
Intermodal and automotive  131.9   130.3   1.6   1%  250.2   253.0   (2.8)  (1)%
                                 
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units  536.8   504.1   32.7   6%  621.3   634.9   (13.6)  (2)%
                                 
Other revenue  10.8   6.4   4.4   69%                
                                 
Total revenues $547.6  $510.5  $37.1   7%                
                                 
Revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2005, totaled $547.6 million compared to $510.5 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $37.1 million. This increase was primarily attributable to the impact of fuel surcharges of $23.9 million which increased $21.5 million over the nine months ended December 31, 2004, and increases in other factors of $15.6 million.
Chemical and Petroleum.  Revenues from chemical and petrochemical products during the nine months ended December 31, 2005, decreased from the same period in 2004 primarily due to disruptions related to the


38


impact of hurricanes offset by increases in Mexican domestic revenues for the same period, primarily related to the higher consumption of fuel products.
Forest Products and Metals.  Domestic revenues increased during the nine months ended December 31, 2005, as a result of an increase in the production volumes of construction materials such as billets, bar and wire. Steel slab and steel coils revenue decreased as a result of lower international traffic, related to reduced consumption by manufacturing industries offset in part by certain targeted rate increases and fuel surcharges.
Agriculture and Mineral.  Revenues from agriculture products increased during the nine months ended December 31, 2005, compared to the same periods in 2004. The increases were primarily the result of targeted rate increases and fuel surcharges. Volume increases were seen in corn and sugar partially offset by reductions in import shipments of soybeans, sorghum and wheat products during the same 2005 period.
Intermodal and Automotive.  Intermodal freight revenue increased $1.6 million for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to the consolidation of steamship service at the port of Lázaro Cárdenas with the support of the port administration and Hutchinson Terminal. Automotive revenues for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005, decreased primarily as a consequence of lower domestic traffic offset by targeted increases in rates.
Operating Expenses.  Mexico operations reported operating expenses of $530.3 million in the nine months ended December 31, 2005. The following table summarizes operating expenses of KCSM for the nine months ended December 31(in millions):
                 
        Change 
  2005  2004  Dollars  Percent 
 
Compensation and benefits $95.6  $87.2  $8.4   10%
Purchased services  108.7   120.5   (11.8)  (10)%
Fuel  83.1   65.3   17.8   27%
Equipment costs  80.9   66.9   14.0   21%
Depreciation and amortization  67.7   66.6   1.1   2%
Casualties and insurance  14.7   9.7   5.0   52%
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing  41.1   (2.1)  43.2   (2,057)%
Other  38.5   23.8   14.7   62%
                 
Total operating expenses $530.3  $437.9  $92.4   21%
                 
Compensation and benefits.  Salary expenses increased $8.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The increase was largely attributable to the net effects of annual salary increases (4% in June 2005) and the increase in wages and fringe benefits as a result of our labor agreement revision in July 2005 (4.5% in wages and 2% in fringe benefits).
Purchased services.  Costs of purchased services decreased by $11.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Costs of purchased services consist primarily of expenses related to equipment maintenance, haulage, terminal services, security expenses and legal expenses. The decrease includes the effect of establishing a fair market value for locomotive maintenance agreements under purchase accounting of $4.9 million. As a result of the acquisition of Grupo KCSM, Management fee agreements were cancelled, resulting in a reduction of expenses. Additionally, lower legal costs related to the VAT refund claim and a lower cost of expatriates as a result of a personnel restructuring program contributed to the decrease.
Fuel.  Fuel expenses increased for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to the volatility of fuel prices during 2005 and higher fuel consumption compared to 2004.
Equipment cost.  Equipment cost increased for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The variance is attributable principally to an increase in the number of hours and


39


number of movement miles in 2005 compared to 2004 for current traffic. Additionally the increase includes the effect of purchase accounting under which KCSM established a fair market value for all the operating leases for locomotives and freight cars. This, along with a higher number of freight cars leased for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to 2004, resulted in higher rental expense.
Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses in 2005 increased for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. This increase includes the effects of purchase accounting, whereby the book values of assets were adjusted upward based on a market value appraisal along with capital improvements to the lines resulting in additional depreciation and amortization. This increase was offset by the effect of changes in the estimated useful lives on properties, machinery and equipment resulting in a lower depreciation expense in 2005.
Casualties and insurance.  These expenses increased for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period ended in 2004. These increases were primarily the result of costs associated with derailments that occurred over the nine months ending in 2005. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in the insurance premiums compared to 2004.
Employees’ statutory profit sharing.  The increase in the employees’ statutory profit sharing for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 was a result of recent Mexican Supreme Court decisions in May 2005 denying the deductibility of NOL’s in calculating the Company’s employees’ profit sharing liability. As part of purchase accounting, KCS valued the profit sharing NOL asset at zero as a result of the court rulings and wrote off the deferred profit sharing asset associated with these NOL’s. This resulted in a charge to income of $35.6 million.
Other.  For the nine months ended December 31, 2005, these expenses increased compared to the same period ended December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to the reduction in value of certain assets after purchase accounting as well as management’s decision to increase the allowance for doubtful customer accounts based upon current prospects for collection of certain customer accounts.
Consolidated Non-Operating Expenses.
Consolidated Interest Expense.  Consolidated interest expense increased $89.1 million for year ended December 31, 2005, when compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2004. This increase was the result of higher floating interest rates incurred under the credit agreement, increased borrowings under the revolving credit facility, interest associated with the debt assumed as part of the locomotive acquisition from El-Mo and the addition of interest expense of $71.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2005, due to the acquisition of KCSM and $1.1 million for the twelve months ending December 31, 2005, due to the acquisition of Mexrail.
Consolidated Debt Retirement Costs.  Consolidated debt retirement costs increased $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. In 2003, KCSR revenues increased $13.6 million2005, when compared to 2002, primarily as a result of higher revenues for the paper and forest, agriculture and mineral and intermodal commodity groups as well as higher revenues for extra services (haulage, switching, demurrage). These revenue increases were partially offset by revenue declinessame period in coal, chemical and petroleum products and automotive traffic. A portion of the revenue increases can be attributed to operational improvements realized in 2003 as a result of the increased effectiveness of MCS. During the second half of 2002, operations were slowed by the implementation of MCS, contributing to a decline in 2002 revenues. Extra service revenues increased during 2003 as a result of better information on train movements derived through MCS. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 included approximately $3.6 million related to reductions of certain allowances and reserves based upon revised estimates. Revenue from other subsidiaries increased approximately

$1.5 million year over year primarily due to volume increases at the Company’s bulk petroleum coke facility and higher sales to third parties at the Company’s wood tie treating facility. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of other revenues due to the sale of the Wyandotte Garage Corporation (“WGC”) during August 2002. The following discussion provides an analysis of KCSR revenues by commodity group.

Chemical and Petroleum.2004. For the year ended December 31, 2003, chemical2005, $4.4 million in unamortized debt issuance costs were written off primarily in connection with the refinancing of KCSM’s 11.75% debentures and petroleum product revenues declined $6.9 million (5.3%) to $123.8 million compared to $130.7 million forits First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 24, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily as a result2004, KCS recorded $4.2 million of lower revenues for plastic product shipments in large part due todebt retirement costs resulting from the loss of a customer and lower production. Also contributing to lower revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002 were declines in petroleum and agri-chemical product revenues. Petroleum revenues for 2003 dropped as a resultwrite-off of the adverse impactunamortized balance of high natural gas prices on petroleum production. Natural gas serves as both a feedstock and a source of energy for producers. Lower agri-chemical revenues resulted from changes in traffic mix. These declines in agri-chemical, petroleum and plastic product revenues were partially offset by higher revenues for gases, organic and inorganic products. Higher revenues for gases and organic products were primarily the result of production increases by certain customers, as well as targeted rate increases and longer hauls due to gateway changes. Higher revenues for inorganic products were primarily the result of increased access to production facilities in Geismar, Louisiana as well as new business previously shipped by other rail carriers, which resulted in higher traffic volume. Chemical and petroleum product revenue accounted for 21.5% and 23.3% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Paper and Forest.For the year ended December 31, 2003, paper and forest product revenue increased $11.3 million (8.4%) to $146.1 million versus $134.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, driven by higher revenues for pulp and paper, scrap paper, pulpwood/logs/chips and lumber/plywood products. Revenues for pulp and paper products as well as scrap paper increased primarily from higher production at KCSR’s paper mill customers and increased exports to Mexico. The increase in lumber and plywood product revenues resulted from continued strength in the housing and homebuilding industry due to sustained levels of housing starts. Increases in revenues for pulpwood/logs/chips resulted from higher production by certain customers and targeted rate increases. Partially offsetting these increases in paper and forest product revenues were lower military/other revenues as a result of the reduction of certain military training exercises, for which KCSR handles equipment transportation, due to the associated deployment of troops to the Middle East. Paper and forest product revenue accounted for 25.4% and 24.0% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Agricultural and Mineral.For the year ended December 31, 2003, agricultural and mineral product revenue increased $11.3 million (11.6%) to $108.5 million compared to $97.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase resulted primarily from higher revenues for export grain, food products, ore and mineral products as well as stone, clay and glass products. These revenue increases were partially offset by a slight decline in domestic grain revenues for 2003 compared to 2002. This decline was primarily due to the effects of a relative decline in poultry production, reducing the demand for grain shipments to the Company’s poultry producing customers. The impact on domestic grain revenues of reduced poultry production was mostly offset by higher revenues associated with longer hauls gained as a result of a new contract with an existing customer. Increases in revenues for export grain reflected higher volumes of grain exports to Mexico. Food product revenues rose as a result of a new contract with an existing customer yielding increased carloads as well as longer hauls. Food product revenues also increased due to more beer shipments from Mexico into the United States and Canada. Ore and mineral product revenues increased due to higher demand from producers. Agricultural and mineral product revenues accounted for 18.9% and 17.3% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Intermodal and Automotive.For the year ended December 31, 2003, combined intermodal and automotive revenues declined $0.8 million (1.3%) to $59.1 million compared to $59.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, as a result of lower automotive revenues, which declined $3.7 million year over year. Automotive revenues declined as a result of the loss of certain automotive traffic in the third quarter of 2002 as well as the

negative effects of the sluggish economy on the automotive industry as a whole. These automotive revenue declines were partially offset by the favorable impact on revenues of new automotive parts traffic obtained in the first quarter of 2003. Intermodal revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased $2.9 million as a result of higher intermodal traffic with other connecting railroads. Intermodal and automotive revenues accounted for 10.3% and 10.7% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Coal. For the year ended December 31, 2003, coal revenues declined $8.5 million (8.4%) to $92.7 million compared to $101.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily due to a decline in tons shipped resulting from lower overall customer demand. A portion of the coal revenue decline related to the loss of a coal customer in April 2002, as well as to the impact of scheduled maintenance shutdowns in 2003, which where longer in duration compared to 2002. These factors, which led to a reduction in coal revenues, were partially offset by the impact of higher per-carload revenues as a result of the use of aluminum cars, which are capable of greater hauling capacity. Coal revenue accounted for 16.1% and 18.0% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Other.For the year ended December 31, 2003 other rail-related revenues increased $7.2 million (19.0%) to $45.1 million compared to $37.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily the result of higher revenues for demurrage and other rail-related extra services, which resulted from improved operating efficienciesdebt issuance costs associated with the implementation of MCS in third quarter 2002. Haulage revenue also increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002. Other rail-related revenues accounted for 7.8% and 6.7% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Operating Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated operating expenses increased $34.0 million to $552.2 million compared to $518.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. As described further below, this increase resulted primarily from higher costs for casualties and insurance and for fuel, which increased $31.2 million and $9.0 million, respectively, year over year. These costs were partially offset by lower expenses related to car hire and certain other expenses arising from operating efficiencies realized through improved employee knowledge and effectiveness in using MCS. In 2002, certain costs and expenses were higher than normal due to the impact of the implementation of MCS and the related congestion. The expenses most affected by the MCS implementation were compensation and benefits, depreciation, purchased services and car hire. See further discussion below.

previous credit facility.

Compensation and Benefits. For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated compensation and benefits expense was unchanged at $197.8 million compared to $197.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. During 2003, KCSR experienced a reduction in the number of crew starts and lower overtime pay in its transportation operations, even though carload volumes increased more than 2% in 2003 compared to 2002. Management believes these improvements are partially a result of the increased efficiency of train operations as KCSR operating personnel gained a better understanding of the data demands of MCS and have become more proficient at using this technology tool to enhance efficiencies. Furthermore, 2002 compensation and benefits costs were higher due to operating inefficiencies that occurred as a result of the implementation of MCS. The efficiency gains realized during 2003 have been offset by an increase in certain union wage rates and related back pay for prior service time as a result of the settlement of certain union contracts and higher overall health insurance related costs. In 2002, operating expenses were also affected by a $1.3 million increase in expenses for the estimate of post employment benefits arising from the Company’s third party actuarial study and the impact of a favorable adjustment related to the accrual for retroactive wage increases to union employees.

Depreciation and Amortization.For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated depreciation expense increased $2.9 million to $64.3 million compared to $61.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily the result of the implementation of MCS in July of 2002, which was only depreciated for six months in 2002 compared to a full year in 2003. The remainder of the increase resulted from a net increase in the property, plant and equipment asset base.

Purchased Services.For the year ended December 31, 2003, purchased services expense increased $3.9 million to $63.5 million compared to $59.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The year over year increase primarily resulted from increased legal expenses, an increase in track, bridge, locomotive and car repairs performed by third parties and a reduction in intermodal lift fee credits received from other railroads. These cost increases were partially offset by higher car repairs billed to others by KCSR and lower training expenses in 2003. Training costs in 2002 were higher than normal due to the training associated with the implementation of MCS. Legal fees in 2003 were higher than 2002 due to the impact of a $1.0 million legal settlement received in 2002 and insurance recovery credits of $4.0 million realized in 2002.

Operating Leases.Consolidated operating lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $57.2 million compared to $55.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This $2.2 million increase in lease expense was partially related to a new lease for maintenance vehicles and work equipment, which in prior periods were owned by KCSR and partially as a result of a full year of lease payments in 2003 for the Company’s new corporate headquarters building. The Company began leasing this facility in the second quarter of 2002. These increases were partially offset by lower freight car equipment costs as a result of the expiration of leases that have not been renewed due to the continued improvements in fleet utilization.

Casualties and Insurance. For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated casualties and insurance expense increased $31.2 million to $56.4 million compared to $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The year over year increase was primarily due to additional costs recorded during the fourth quarter of 2003 related to personal injury liability reserves. The Company’s process of establishing liability reserves for personal injury incidents is based upon an actuarial study by an independent outside actuary, a process followed by most large railroads. This adjustment to the personal injury liability reserves was based on this actuarial study and was required due to adverse development of prior year claims and the continuing tort litigious environment surrounding the railroad industry, particularly for occupational injury claims. Also contributing to the increase in 2003 was higher property and liability related insurance costs, as well as the receipt of $8.5 million in legal and insurance settlements in 2002, which reduced the comparable 2002 expense.

Fuel. Locomotive fuel costs for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased $9.0 million to $47.4 million compared to $38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, due to an approximate 23% increase in the average cost per gallon of fuel. KCSR’s average fuel price was approximately $0.86 per gallon in 2003 compared to approximately $0.69 per gallon in 2002. Fuel consumption remained relatively unchanged year over year as a result of fuel conservation measures offsetting higher consumption due to increased carload volumes.

Car Hire.Car hire expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased $9.7 million to $10.0 million compared to $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decline resulted from improved fleet utilization associated with the implementation of MCS as KCSR was operating more efficiently during 2003 than in 2002. The improvement in fleet utilization has led to an increase in the number of KCSR freight cars being used by other railroads as well as a reduction in the number of freight cars owned by other railroads on the Company’s rail line. In the last half of 2002, the congestion-related issues associated with the implementation of MCS substantially impacted 2002 car hire expense.

Other Expense. Consolidated other expense decreased $5.5 million to $55.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $61.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily as a result of higher gains recorded on the sale of operating properties. For 2003, gains from operating property sales were $5.9 million compared to $3.2 million for 2002, an increase of $2.7 million. Also impacting the comparison was a decline in costs for materials and supplies, employee expenses and a reduction in miscellaneous taxes.

Operating Income and KCSR Operating Ratio.For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated operating income decreased $18.9 million to $29.1 million compared to $48.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decrease was the result of a $15.1 million increase in revenues offset by a $34.0 million increase in operating expenses (mostly casualty and fuel related as discussed above). The operating ratios (ratio of railway operating expenses to railway operating revenues) for KCSR were 89.7% and 89.2% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Equity in Net Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Affiliates.For the year ended December 31, 2003,2005, equity in earnings from other unconsolidated affiliates was $3.9 million compared to equity in losses from other unconsolidated affiliate of $2.1 million for the same period of 2004. Significant components of this change were as follows:

• For the year ended December 31, 2005, equity in losses from the operations of PCRC was $1.7 million, compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2004.
• For the year ended December 31, 2005, equity in earnings of Southern Capital was $2.8 million, compared to $2.7 million, for the same period in 2004.


40


• For the nine months ended December 31, 2005, KCSM’s equity in earnings of Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”) was $2.9 million.
For 2005, earnings for Southern Capital were $13.1 million compared to $11.8 million in 2004. This increase of $1.3 million was primarily the result of a gain recognized by Southern Capital for the sale of locomotives in 2005 of approximately $7.7 million as compared to $6.0 million in 2004. The sales of locomotives were to KCSR in the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, respectively. For purposes of recording its share of Southern Capital earnings, the Company has recorded its share of the gain as a reduction to the cost basis of the equipment acquired. As a result, the Company will recognize its equity in net earningsthe gain over the remaining depreciable life of unconsolidated affiliatesthe locomotives as a reduction of $11.0depreciation expense.
Consolidated Income Tax Provision (Benefit).  For the year ended December 31, 2005, KCS’s income tax benefit was $7.1 million, a $32.4change of $30.7 million declineas compared to $43.4a $23.6 million expense for the year ended December 31, 2002.2004. This decreasechange was driven by lower equity in net earnings from Grupo TFM, which declined $33.5 million year over year, partially offset by a $1.1 million improvement in equity in net earnings (losses) from other unconsolidated affiliates.

Equity in earnings related to Grupo TFM decreased to $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $45.8 million for 2002. Revenues for Grupo TFM for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased $13.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 while operating expenses (under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America—“U.S. GAAP”) were $17.2 million higher. Revenues for Grupo TFM were adversely affected by an 8% decline in automotive shipments year over year and the devaluation of the Mexican peso against the United States dollar on a year over year basis, which resulted in a reduction of revenues of approximately $34 million during 2003 versus 2002. Similar to KCSR, the increase in operating expenses at Grupo TFM was driven by higher fuel costs, which rose $13.8 million in 2003 versus 2002. Grupo TFM’s interest expense under U.S. GAAP in 2003 increased approximately $15.3 million compared to 2002 primarily as a result of increased debt costs related to the acquisition of the Mexican government’s ownership of Grupo TFM. Also contributing to the lower earnings of Grupo TFM was a $20.8 million increase in other expenses due to certain expenses associated with the VAT Claim. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2003, Grupo TFM’s results include a deferred tax benefit of $51.5 million (calculated under U.S. GAAP) compared to a deferred tax benefit of $91.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, resulting in an approximate $15.2 million reduction in the equity in net earnings recorded by the Company related to its proportionate ownership of Grupo TFM. This fluctuation was the result of numerous factors, including fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the Mexican peso and the United States dollar during 2003, as well as lower future Mexican corporate tax rates. These rate changes had the effect of reducing Grupo TFM’s deferred tax asset, thus reducing Grupo TFM’s deferred tax benefit. Grupo TFM’s deferred tax assets are the result of prior year net operating losses for income tax purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2003, fluctuations in the Mexican peso exchange rate also contributed to a $13.7 million exchange loss compared to an exchange loss of $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Company’s equity in net earnings of Grupo TFM was also impacted by the Company’s increased ownership of Grupo TFM to 46.6% from 36.9%, which the Company obtained indirectly in July 2002 as a result of the purchase by TFM of the Mexican government’s 24.6% ownership of Grupo TFM.

Results of the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM are reported under U.S. GAAP while Grupo TFM reports its financial results under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Because the Company is required to report its equity in net earnings in Grupo TFM under U.S. GAAP and Grupo TFM reports under IFRS, differences in deferred income tax calculations and the classification of certain operating expense categories occur. The deferred income tax calculations are significantly impacted by fluctuations in the relative value of the Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar and the rate of Mexican inflation, and can result in significant variability in the amount of equity earnings reported by the Company.

Equity in net losses of the Company’s other unconsolidated affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $1.3 million compared to equity in net losses of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. In 2003, losses associated with PCRC were $3.1 million compared to $3.8 million in 2002. PCRC is not operating at full capacity as initially planned due to the delay in completion of the port expansion at Balboa. These losses were offset by equity in net earnings from Southern Capital of $1.8 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Gain on Sale of Mexrail, Inc. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes a gain on the sale of the Company’s investment in Mexrail of $4.4 million (See “Recent Developments—Mexrail Transactions”).

Interest Expense. Consolidated interest expense increased $1.4 millioncomplexities relating to $46.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $45.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Interest expense rose due to higher interest rates arising from a shift to more fixed rate debt in June 2002, partially offset by the impact of a lower debt balance. The Company’s debt balance declined $59.2 million during 2003 to $523.4 million at December 31, 2003 from $582.6 million at December 31, 2002.

Debt Retirement Costs. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes debt retirement costs of $4.3 million related to the debt refinancing during the second quarter of 2002.

Other Income. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2003 declined $10.8 million compared to 2002, primarily due to substantially lower gains on the sale of non-operating property compared to 2002 as well as the impact of the sale of WGC in 2002. Gains recorded on the sale of non-operating property were $0.3 million and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit). For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company’s income tax provision (benefit) decreased $9.7 million to a $2.8 million benefit compared to a $6.9 million provision for the year ended December 31, 2002 due to a $63.6 million decline in income (loss) before income taxes. This resultedMexico taxes resulting in an effective income tax rate of (600.7)%(9.3%) and 11.3%49.1% for the years ended December 31, 20032005 and 2002,2004, respectively. ExclusiveThe primary causes of equity earningsthe decrease in Grupo TFM, the Company realized a pre-tax loss of $11.8 million in 2003 compared to pre-tax income of $18.3 million in 2002, resulting in a consolidated effective incomerate were the VAT/Put Settlement, the utilization of U.S. tax credits enacted for the tax year 2005, a lower Mexican statutory tax rate of 23.8% for 200330% as compared to 37.7%U.S. statutory rate of 35%, and foreign exchange rate fluctuations and inflation. The VAT/Put Settlement gain was not taxable in Mexico and is not expected to be taxable for 2002. This varianceU.S. income tax purposes. The Company believes, based upon opinions of outside legal counsel and other factors, that the VAT/Put Settlement should not be taxable to KCS for U.S. income tax purposes. Such position has not been examined by taxing authorities and it is possible that this position could be challenged. The amount of such tax would be material; however the Company believes that it would have the right to indemnification under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement.

Following the acquisition of control of Grupo KCSM in 2005, the effective tax rate was primarily the result of changes in associated book/tax temporary differences, the level of pre-taxCompany has not provided U.S. federal income and the impact of permanent book/tax differencestaxes on the effective rate computation. Theundistributed earnings of Grupo KCSM since the Company intends to reinvest such earnings indefinitely reinvestoutside of the United States.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
KCS’s primary uses of cash are to support operations; maintain and improve its railroad and information systems infrastructure; pay debt service and preferred stock dividends; acquire new and maintain existing locomotives, rolling stock and other equipment; and meet other obligations. See “Cash Flow Information and Contractual Obligations” below.
KCS has a Debt/Equity ratio of 52.6 percent. Its primary sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations, borrowings under its revolving credit facilities and access to debt and equity earnings from Grupo TFMcapital markets. Although KCS has had excellent access to capital markets, as a highly leveraged company, the financial terms under which funding is obtained often contain restrictive covenants. The covenants constrain financial flexibility by restricting or prohibiting certain actions, including the ability to incur debt, create or suffer to exist liens, make prepayments of particular debt, pay dividends, make capital investments, engage in transactions with stockholders and accordingly, the Company does not provide deferred income tax expense for the excess of its book basis over the tax basis of its investmentaffiliates, issue capital stock, sell certain assets, and engage in Grupo TFM.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change.The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”) effective January 1, 2003. mergers and consolidations or in sale-leaseback transactions. On December 31, 2006, total available liquidity (the unrestricted cash balance plus revolving credit facility availability) was $144 million.

As a result of KCS acquiring a controlling interest in Grupo KCSM and KCSM, both companies became subject to the Company changed its methodterms and conditions of accountingthe indentures governing KCSR’s two senior notes issues. The restrictive covenants of these indentures limit the ability of Grupo KCSM and KCSM to incur additional debt for removal costsany purpose other than the refinancing of existing debt and certain track structure assets and recorded a benefitnew asset financing.
During 2006 KCS’ ability to access capital markets was affected by the late filing of $8.9 million (net of income taxes of $5.6 million) during the first quarter of 2003.Company’s annual report onForm 10-K

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Net Income.For the year ended December 31, 2002, net income increased $26.5 million to $57.2 million (91¢ per diluted share) from $30.7 million (50¢ per diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2001.2005. This increaselate filing also caused defaults under the Company’s credit agreements due to the Company’s failure to meet certain reporting requirements. Additionally, the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness and pay cash dividends was primarily restricted by


41


the resultCompany’s failure to comply with certain financial ratios under its indentures and credit agreements. A consequence of a $17.3 million increase in equity in earningsthe late filing of Grupo TFM, a $13.4 million increase in other income, a $7.8 million decrease in interest expense, and a $4.4 million gain realizedthe Company’s annual report on the sale of Mexrail to TFM. This increase in net income was partially offset by a $7.4 million decline in operating income, a $4.1 million increase in the provision for income taxes, and a $1.0 million decline in equity in net earnings (losses) of other unconsolidated affiliates. Additionally, net incomeForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes2005 and its failure to pay dividends on preferred stock was that its ability to quickly access the public equity markets has been reduced significantly, since KCS did not qualify as a “well-known seasoned issuer” and also cannot utilize the short-form registration statement onForm S-3. KCS paid accrued and unpaid and current dividends on its outstanding 4% Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock on February 15, 2007, and believes it will become a well-known seasoned issuer and again be eligible to use short-form registration onForm S-3 on May 1, 2007, as described below in “Shelf Registration Statements and Public Securities Offerings.” KCS sought and obtained amendments and waivers for each of these defaults in 2006.
The Company believes, based on current expectations, that cash and other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to capital markets, and other available financing resources will be sufficient to fund anticipated operating, capital and debt retirementservice requirements and other commitments through 2007. However, KCS’ operating cash flow and financing alternatives can be unexpectedly impacted by various factors, some of which are outside of its control. For example, if KCS was to experience a substantial reduction in revenues or a substantial increase in operating costs or other liabilities, its operating cash flows could be significantly reduced. Additionally, the Company is subject to economic factors surrounding capital markets and its ability to obtain financing under reasonable terms is subject to market conditions. Further, KCS’ cost of $4.3 million relateddebt can be impacted by independent rating agencies, which assign debt ratings based on certain credit measurements such as interest coverage and leverage ratios.
As of December 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”) rated the senior secured debt as BB−, our senior unsecured debt as B− and the preferred stock as D. S&P also maintained a corporate rating on KCS of B and had a negative outlook. Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”) rated the senior secured debt as Ba2, the senior unsecured debt as B3 and the preferred stock as Caa1. Moody’s also maintained a probability of default rating on KCS of B2 and had a stable outlook. On February 8, 2007, S&P changed the Company’s outlook from negative to stable and on February 16, 2007, they upgraded the early retirementrating on the preferred stock from D to CCC.
Long Term Debt and Credit Facility Activity.
On March 1, 2006, KCS, KCSR, and other KCS subsidiaries entered into a fourth waiver (the “Fourth Waiver”) of term debtthe credit agreement dated March 30, 2004 (the “2004 Credit Agreement”). Under the terms of the Fourth Waiver, which was to expire on April 30, 2006, the Lenders agreed to waive the requirement that KCS maintain a leverage ratio (as defined in June 2002. Net incomethe 2004 Credit Agreement) of not more than 5.00:1 for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2001 includes2005, provided that such ratio did not exceed 5.50:1. The ratio did not exceed 5.50:1.
On March 31, 2006, KCSM failed to meet certain reporting requirements under the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement and had not met the leverage ratio covenant at the end of 2005. These failures resulted in defaults under the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement and limited KCSM’s access to the revolving credit facility. On April 7, 2006, KCSM entered into an amendment and waiver (“Amendment and Waiver”) to the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement. The 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement was amended to (i) exclude certain payment obligations accrued under two locomotive maintenance agreements and under a $0.4track maintenance rehabilitation agreement from the definition of Indebtedness, (ii) eliminate certain minimum and multiple borrowing thresholds for peso borrowings under the revolving credit facility and (iii) eliminate the reporting requirement to provide unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fourth fiscal quarter. The Amendment and Waiver also waived certain reporting requirements, including the requirement of KCSM to provide audited consolidated financial statements 90 days after the end of the 2005 fiscal year, provided such reports were delivered by April 30, 2006, and compliance with the Consolidated Leverage Ratio obligations of Section 7.1(c) of the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement for the four quarters ending December 31, 2005, if compliance therewith was calculated without giving effect to the amendment to the definition of “Indebtedness” in the Amendment and Waiver,providedthat KCSM was in compliance therewith after giving effect to the Amendment and Waiver.


42


KCSM is not currently in default under the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement and currently has access to the revolving credit facility.
On April 7, 2006, KCS, KCSR and other KCS subsidiaries entered into a fifth waiver of the 2004 Credit Agreement (the “Fifth Waiver”). Under the terms of the Fifth Waiver, which was to expire on April 30, 2006, the Lenders agreed to waive the requirement of Section 5.03(b) that KCS furnish a copy of its 2005 annual audited financial statements by March 31, 2006, so long as KCS furnished such audited financial statements by April 30, 2006. The Company furnished such audited financial statements by that date.
On April 28, 2006, KCS, KCSR and the other subsidiary guarantors named therein entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “2006 Credit Agreement”), in an aggregate amount of $371.1 million chargewith The Bank of Nova Scotia and other lenders named in the 2006 Credit Agreement. Proceeds from the 2006 Credit Agreement were used to refinance the 2004 Credit Agreement. The 2006 Credit Agreement consists of (a) a $125.0 million revolving credit facility with a letter of credit sublimit of $25.0 million and swing line advances of up to $15.0 million, and (b) a $246.1 million term loan facility. The maturity date for the revolving credit facility is April 28, 2011 and the maturity date of the term loan facility is April 28, 2013. The 2006 Credit Agreement contains covenants that restrict or prohibit certain actions, including, but not limited to, KCS’ ability to incur debt, create or suffer to exist liens, make prepayment of particular debt, pay dividends, make investments, engage in transactions with stockholders and affiliates, issue capital stock, sell certain assets, and engage in mergers and consolidations or in sale-leaseback transactions. In addition, KCS must meet certain consolidated interest coverage and leverage ratios. Failure to maintain compliance with the covenants could constitute a default which could accelerate the payment of any outstanding amounts under the 2006 Credit Agreement.
On October 23, 2006, pursuant to an offer to purchase dated such date, KCSM commenced a cash tender offer and consent solicitation for any and all outstanding $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 101/4% Senior Notes due 2007 (the “KCSM 2007 Senior Notes”). The consent solicitation expired on November 3, 2006. KCSM received consents in connection with the tender offer and consent solicitation from holders of over 97% of the KCSM 2007 Senior Notes to amend the indenture under which the KCSM 2007 Senior Notes were issued (the “2007 Indenture”), to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants included in the 2007 Indenture. The supplemental indenture relating to the implementationKCSM 2007 Senior Notes containing the proposed changes (the “2007 Supplemental Indenture”) became effective on November 21, 2006. The tender offer expired at midnight, New York City time, on November 20, 2006 and KCSM purchased tendered notes on November 21, 2006, in accordance with the terms of Statementthe tender offer.
On November 21, 2006 KCSM issued $175.0 million of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instrumentsnew, unsecured, 75/8% senior notes due 2013 (the “KCSM 2013 Senior Notes”). Proceeds from the issuance were used to purchase the $146.0 million of tendered KCSM 2007 Senior Notes and Hedging Activities”(“SFAS 133”).

Revenues. Consolidated revenues forrepay $29.0 million of term loans under the year ended December 31, 2002 declined $17.0 million2005 KCSM Credit Agreement.

On January 29, 2007, the Company commenced a consent solicitation to $566.2 million comparedamend the indentures under which KCSR’s 91/2% Senior Notes due 2008 (the “91/2% Notes”) and 71/2% Senior Notes due 2009 (the “71/2% Notes” and together with the 91/2% Notes, the “Notes”) were issued. The Company identified certain inconsistencies in the language of the indentures which prevented KCS from obtaining a coverage ratio of at least 2.00:1. The purpose of the consent solicitation was to $583.2 million for(i) resolve an inconsistency in the year ended December 31, 2001. In 2002, KCSR revenues declined $13.2 million comparedinclusion of certain expenses, but not the income, of restricted subsidiaries in the calculation of the consolidated coverage ratio under the indentures, (ii) amend the definition of refinancing indebtedness to 2001, primarily as a resultallow the inclusion of lower coalcertain related premiums, interest, fees and automotive revenues partially offset by higher revenues for all other major commodity groups. The increaseexpenses in revenues for certain commodity groups, including chemicalpermitted refinancing indebtedness and petroleum products, agricultural and mineral products, paper and forest products and intermodal traffic, was driven by a combination(iii) obtain waivers of volume gains in certain commodities, increased length of haul

and price improvements in key traffic lanes. These revenue gains were partially offset by volume losses in certain commodities within these groups. KCS management believes that revenues for these commodity groups would have improved even further during 2002, but were adversely affected by lower carloadingsany defaults arising from congestion relatedcertain actions taken in the absence of such proposed amendments. On February 5, 2007, the Company obtained the requisite consents from the holders of each series of Notes to amend their respective indentures as described above and executed supplemental indentures containing such amendments and waivers.

On January 31, 2007, KCS provided written notice to the implementationlenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement of MCS. Revenue from other subsidiaries decreased approximately $3.8 million year over year primarily due to demand driven volume declines related to the Company’s petroleum coke bulk handling facility. The following discussion provides an analysis of KCSR revenues by commodity group.

Chemical and Petroleum.For the year ended December 31, 2002, chemical and petroleum product revenues increased $5.9 million (4.7%) to $130.7 million compared to $124.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. These revenue increases were the result of a combination of higher traffic volumes for certain commodities within this business group as well as targeted rate increases and longer hauls due to gateway changes. Higher revenues for gases and organic products were primarily the result of production increases by certain customers, as well as changes in traffic patterns and targeted rate increases. Higher revenues for inorganic products were primarily the result of increased access to production facilities in Geismar, Louisiana, as well as new business previously shipped by other rail carriers, which resulted in higher traffic volume. Increases in the production of PVC and plastic pellet products led to an increase in carloadings and higher revenues for plastic products. These increases were partially offset by volume related declines in agri-chemical and petroleum product revenues due to lower industrial production related to the continued slowdown in the U.S. economy. Chemical and petroleum products revenue accounted for 23.3% and 21.7% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Paper and Forest.For the year ended December 31, 2002, paper and forest product revenue increased $5.7 million (4.4%) to $134.8 million versus $129.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Increases in revenues for pulp and paper, scrap paper and lumber/plywood were partially offset by lower revenues for pulpwood/logs/chips, scrap metal and military/other traffic. Increase in pulp and paper revenues resulted from higher traffic volumes as a result of production growth in the paper industry, while continued strength in the home building market and housing starts led to increases in lumber and plywood product revenues. These revenues were also higher due to certain rate increases and changes in traffic mix and length of haul. Declines in industrial production as a result of the slowdown in the U.S. economy led to lower carloadings and revenues for pulpwood, logs, and chip products as well as metal products. The decline in militaryrepresentation and other carload revenues is a reflection ofdefaults under the effect of a significant one-time military movement in 2001. Targeted rate increases and changes in traffic patterns for metal products and pulpwood, logs and chips partially offset the related revenue decline resulting from lower traffic volumes for these commodities. Paper and forest products revenue accounted for 24.0% and 22.5% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Agricultural and Mineral.For the year ended December 31, 2002, revenues for agricultural and mineral products increased $3.4 million (3.6%) to $97.2 million compared to $93.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, as a result of higher revenues across all major products in the agricultural and mineral commodity group. Domestic grain revenues increased as a result of certain rate increases and longer hauls partially offset by lower domestic demand. Export grain revenue increased slightly during 2002 versus 2001 on the strength of higher demand from Mexico and other export markets during the first half of 2002. This demand eased somewhat during the last half of 2002. Increases in revenue for stone, clay and glass product were primarily the result of higher production by two customers, targeted rate increases and longer hauls. Agricultural and mineral products revenue accounted for 17.3% and 16.3% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Intermodal and Automotive.For the year ended December 31, 2002, combined intermodal and automotive revenues decreased $9.2 million (13.3%) to $59.9 million compared to $69.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, primarily as a result of lower automotive revenues, which declined $12.3 million (57.0%) year over year. This decline in automotive revenues resulted from the loss of certain business in the third quarter of 2001 and the loss of a significant movement effective May 2002. Also contributing was the general decline in the domestic automobile industry as a result of weakness in the U.S. economy. These factors contributed to a 62.8% year over year decline in carload volumes for automotive traffic. For the year ended December 31, 2002,

intermodal revenues increased $3.1 million (6.6%) compared to 2001, as a result of increases in domestic carload traffic as well as international traffic moving to Mexico. Intermodal and automotive revenues accounted for 10.7% and 12.0% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Coal. For the year ended December 31, 2002, coal revenues declined $17.5 million (14.7%) to $101.2 million compared to $118.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Coal revenues were significantly impacted by a rate reduction at the Company’s largest utility customer as well as the loss of a coal customer in April 2002 due to the expiration of a contract. These revenue declines were partially offset by a near 7% increase in net tons delivered in 2002 compared to 2001, resulting from higher demand at certain utility customers and the reopening of a utility plant in Kansas City, Missouri in the second quarter of 2001 that had been out of service since July of 1999. Coal revenue accounted for 18.0% and 20.6% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Other.For the year ended December 31, 2002, other rail-related revenues declined $1.5 million (3.8%) to $37.9 million compared to $39.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decline was primarily the result of declines in switching and demurrage revenues partially offset by increases in other revenues. Haulage revenues remained relatively unchanged in 2002 compared to 2001. Other rail-related revenues accounted for 6.7% and 6.9% of KCSR revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Operating Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated operating expenses decreased $9.6 million to $518.2 million compared to $527.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, resulting from a $6.0 million decline in KCSR expenses coupled with a $3.6 million decline in expenses from other subsidiaries. This decrease was partially offset by the impact of higher costs associated with the implementation of MCS. The expenses most affected by the MCS implementation were compensation and benefits, depreciation, purchased services and car hire. See further discussion below.

Compensation and Benefits. For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated compensation and benefits expense increased $4.9 million to $197.8 million compared to $192.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily the result of higher overtime and crew costs during the second half of 2002 related to the traffic congestion resulting from the third quarter 2002 implementation of MCS. Compensation and benefits expense in 2002 was also impacted by the implementation of an increase in certain union wages effective July 1, 2002, higher health insurance costs and a $1.3 million increase in expenses for the estimate of post employment benefits2006 Credit Agreement arising from the Company’s third party actuarial study. Additionally,potential defaults which existed under the increase in compensation and benefits was affected byKCSR indentures governing the impact of a $2.0 million reduction in retirement-based costs for certain union employees recorded in 2001, which reduced comparable 2001 expense.Notes as described above. These factors were partially offset by lower employee headcount, the automation of certain switch locomotive crew functions, a favorable adjustment relateddefaults limited


43


KCSR’s access to the accrual for retroactive wage increases to union employees, which was not provided for inrevolving credit facility. In its notice of default, the national labor union contract and lower railroad retirement taxes asCompany also requested that the lenders waive these defaults. On February 5, 2007, the Company received a resultwaiver of such defaults from all of the reduction in employer contributionslenders under the Railroad Retirement Act.2006 Credit Agreement. The increaseCompany is currently not in compensation and benefits expense was also impacted by the effect of workforce reduction costs of $1.3 million recorded in the first quarter of 2001.

Depreciation and Amortization.For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated depreciation expense increased $3.4 million to $61.4 million compared to $58.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily the resultdefault of the implementation of MCS in July of 2002, which increased depreciation expense by $2.4 million in 2002. The remainder of the increase resulted from a net increase in the property, plant2006 Credit Agreement and equipment asset base.

Purchased Services.For the year ended December 31, 2002, purchased services expense increased $2.6 million to $59.6 million compared to $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was the result of higher environmental compliance costs and legal costs, higher locomotive and car repair costs contracted to third parties as well as an increase in other general purchased services. Also contributinghas access to the increase in purchased services expense were higher employee training costs associated with the implementation

of MCS and an increase to the reserve for environmental remediation related to a specific site. This increase in costs was partially mitigated by insurance and legal settlements totaling approximately $5.0 million.

revolving credit facility.

Operating Leases.Consolidated operating lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 decreased $1.8 million to $55.0 million compared to $56.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease was primarily the result of the expiration of leases that were not been renewed due to continued changes in fleet utilization. This decrease in lease expense was partially offset by increases in lease costs of approximately $1.9 million in 2002 associated with the lease for the Company’s new corporate headquarters building.

Casualties and Insurance. For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated casualties and insurance expense decreased $16.9 million to $25.2 million compared to $42.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 due primarily to lower derailment costs, and the receipt of insurance settlements in 2002, partially offset by higher insurance costs. In the first quarter of 2001, the Company incurred $8.5 million in costs related to several significant derailments as well as the settlement of a personal injury claim. Derailment costs for the year ended December 31, 2002 were more normalized compared to 2001. Also impacting the decrease in casualties and insurance expense was the receipt of $8.5 million in legal and insurance settlements during 2002. Expenses in 2002 for personal injury claims were slightly higher compared to 2001. The Company’s process of establishing liability reserves for these types of incidents is based upon an actuarial study by an independent outside actuary, a process followed by most large railroads.

Fuel. Locomotive fuel costs for the year ended December 31, 2002 decreased $5.5 million to $38.4 million compared to $43.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease was the combined result of an 8.8% decrease in the average cost per gallon of fuel and a 4.0% decline in fuel consumption due primarily to aggressive fuel conservation measures.

Car Hire.Car hire expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 was relatively unchanged, decreasing only $0.1 million to $19.7 million compared to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. For the first half of 2002, car hire expense decreased approximately $2.9 million compared to the same period in 2001 as KCSR was operating a more efficient and well-controlled railroad. In early 2001, an unusual number of significant derailments (as discussed in casualties and insurance), as well as the effects of line washouts and flooding had a significant adverse impact on the efficiency of KCSR’s operations in the first half of 2001. The resulting inefficiency led to congestion on KCSR’s rail lines during the first half of 2001, which contributed to an increase in the number of freight cars from other railroads on the Company’s rail line. For the second half of 2002, car hire expense increased $2.8 million compared to the second half of 2001. This increase was due to a higher number of freight cars from other railroads on the Company’s rail line as well as fewer KCSR freight cars on other railroads as a result of increased congestion resulting from the implementation of MCS in the third quarter of 2002.

Other Expense. Consolidated other expense increased $3.8 million to $61.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $57.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Factors contributing to this increase included an increase in material and supply costs related to maintenance of way and equipment of $2.5 million, as well as a $2.6 million decline in gains recorded on the sale of operating assets by KCSR. The effect of these increases was partially offset by a decline in the cost of sales and other expenses incurred by certain subsidiaries.

Operating Income and KCSR Operating Ratio.For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated operating income decreased $7.4 million to $48.0 million compared to $55.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease was primarily the result of a $17.0 million decline in revenues partially offset by a $9.6 million decline in operating expenses. The operating ratio for KCSR was 89.2% and 88.2% for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Equity in Net Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Affiliates.For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $43.4 million reflecting an increase of $16.3

million compared to $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was driven by an increase in equity in earnings from Grupo TFM of $17.3 million partially offset by a $1.0 million decline in equity in earnings from other unconsolidated affiliates.

Equity in earnings related to Grupo TFM increased to $45.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $28.5 million for 2001. For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company’s equity in the earnings of Grupo TFM included the Company’s proportionate share ($9.1 million) of the income recorded by Grupo TFM related to the reversion of certain Concession assets to the Mexican government. Exclusive of this 2001 reversion income, equity in earnings of Grupo TFM for the year ended December 31, 2002 increased $26.4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2001. Revenues for Grupo TFM for the year ended December 31, 2002 decreased $7.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2001 (exclusive of Mexrail’s results) while operating expenses (under U.S.GAAP) were $29.5 million lower (exclusive of the 2001 reversion income and Mexrail’s results). For the year ended December 31, 2002, Grupo TFM’s results include a deferred tax benefit of $91.5 million (calculated under U.S. GAAP) compared to a deferred tax expense of $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was the result of numerous factors, including a deferred tax expense recorded in 2001 related to the line reversion income, the weakening of the Mexican peso exchange rate and tax benefits derived from the impact of Mexican inflation in 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2002, fluctuations in the Mexican peso exchange rate also contributed to a $17.4 million exchange loss compared to an exchange gain of $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Equity in losses of the Company’s other unconsolidated affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $2.4 million compared to equity in losses of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. In 2002, losses associated with PCRC were $3.8 million compared to $1.6 million in 2001. PCRC is not operating at full capacity as initially planned due to the delay in completion of the port expansion at Balboa. During 2001, losses were primarily related to the start-up of operations at PCRC. Additionally, the Company reported equity losses from Mexrail of $2.1 million in 2001 compared to essentially a break-even amount for 2002 prior to its sale to TFM. These losses were mitigated by equity earnings from Southern Capital of $1.4 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Gain on Sale of Mexrail, Inc. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes a gain on the sale of the Company’s investment in Mexrail, Inc. of $4.4 million.

Interest Expense. Consolidated interest expense declined $7.8 million to $45.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $52.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease was the result of lower effective interest rates for the first six months of 2002 as well as lower debt balances. The Company’s debt balance declined $75.8 million during 2002 from $658.4 million at December 31, 2001 to $582.6 million at December 31, 2002.

Debt Retirement Costs. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes debt retirement costs of $4.3 million related to the debt refinancing during the second quarter of 2002.

Other Income. Other items affecting net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 were gains totaling approximately $7.4 million related to the sale of certain non-operating properties at a subsidiary of the Company and a $4.9 million gain on the sale of WGC. These items account for the majority of the increase reported in other income for 2002 compared to 2001.

Income Tax Expense. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company’s income tax provision increased $4.1 million to $6.9 million compared to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily the result of gains on the sale of the Company’s investments in WGC and Mexrail, as well as gains realized on the sale of other non-operating assets. Lower interest costs for the year ended December 31, 2002 also contributed to the increase in the income tax provision. These factors, which led to an increase in the income tax provision, were partially offset by lower domestic operating income and resulted in an effective income tax rate of 11.3% and 8.3% for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Exclusive of

equity earnings in Grupo TFM, the consolidated effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 37.7% compared to 51.8% for the year ended December 31, 2001. This variance in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of changes in associated book/tax temporary differences and certain non-taxable items. The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest the equity earnings from Grupo TFM and accordingly, the Company does not provide deferred income tax expense for the excess of its book basis over the tax basis of its investment in Grupo TFM.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change.The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 133 effective January 1, 2001. As a result of this change in the method of accounting for derivative financial instruments, the Company recorded an after-tax charge to earnings of $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2001. This charge is presented as a cumulative effect of an accounting change in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flow Information and Contractual ObligationsObligations.

Summary cash flow data follows for(in millions):
             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Cash flows provided by (used for):            
Operating activities $267.5  $178.8  $142.7 
Investing activities  (166.0)  (289.5)  (376.8)
Financing activities  (53.6)  103.2   137.3 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  47.9   (7.5)  (96.8)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  31.1   38.6   135.4 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $79.0  $31.1  $38.6 
             
During 2006, the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively:

   2003

  2002

  2001

 
   (dollars in millions) 

Cash flows provided by (used for):

             

Operating activities

  $67.3  $95.7  $68.7 

Investing activities

   (83.6)  (34.9)  (55.7)

Financing activities

   132.7   (66.5)  (9.8)
   


 


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   116.4   (5.7)  3.2 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   19.0   24.7   21.5 
   


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $135.4  $19.0  $24.7 
   


 


 


During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company’s consolidated cash position increased $47.9 million due to increased operating income which was partially offset by $116.4additional payments for the acquisition of Grupo KCSM and the refinancing and repayment of debt. During 2005, the consolidated cash position decreased $7.5 million from December 31, 2002.due to an increased level of capital expenditures. The primary sources of cash were as follows: the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock; cash inflows from operating activities; proceeds fromactivities, the disposalissuance and assumption of property;long-term debt, the issuance of preferred stock and borrowings under the proceeds from employee stock plans.revolving credit facilities. The primary usersuses of cash were as follows:for capital expenditures, investments in and loans to affiliates;affiliates, repayment of debt; costs related tolong-term debt and the Acquisition; cash dividends paid; and property acquisitions.

Operating Cash Flows. The Company’srepurchase of KCS’ common stock.

KCS’ cash flow from operations has historically been positive and sufficient to fund operations, as well as fund KCSR roadway capital improvements,expenditures, other capital improvements and debt service. External sources of cash (principally bank debt, public debt, preferred stock and public debt)leases) have been used to refinance existing indebtedness and to fund acquisitions, new investments and equipment additions and repurchases of Company common stock.additions.
Operating Cash Flows.  The following table summarizes consolidated operating cash flow information for the years ended December 31, respectively:

   2003

  2002

  2001

 
   (dollars in millions) 

Net income

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7 

Depreciation and amortization

   64.3   61.4   58.0 

Equity in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (11.0)  (43.4)  (27.1)

Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates

   —     —     3.0 

Deferred income taxes

   (3.1)  21.8   30.4 

Gains on sales of properties and investments

   (6.2)  (20.1)  (5.8)

Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options

   2.5   4.5   5.6 

Change in working capital items

   1.3   10.4   (41.2)

Other

   7.3   3.9   15.1 
   


 


 


Net cash flow from operating activities

  $67.3  $95.7  $68.7 
   


 


 


(in millions):

             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Net income $108.9  $100.9  $24.4 
Depreciation and amortization  155.0   127.7   53.5 
Equity in undistributed losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates  (7.3)  (2.9)  4.5 
VAT/put settlement gain     (131.9)   
Minority interest  0.3   (17.8)   
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates  4.5   8.3   8.8 
Deferred income taxes  41.0   (17.3)  35.9 
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing  5.9   41.1    
Loss (gain) on sale of assets  (7.8)  1.0   (3.8)
Changes in working capital items  (24.5)  45.9   1.3 
Other, net  (8.5)  23.8   18.1 
             
Net cash flow provided by operating activities $267.5  $178.8  $142.7 
             
Net operating cash flows for 2003 declined $28.42006 increased $88.7 million to $67.3$267.5 million compared to $95.7$178.8 million in 2002.2005. This decreaseincrease in operating cash flows was primarily attributable to a reductionbetter operating performance and the consolidation of net income andKCSM for twelve months in 2006 as compared to nine months in 2005. The increase was partially offset by changes in working capital balances resulting mainly fromrelating to the timing of payments and receipts and the receipt of income tax refunds.receipts.


44


Net operating cash flows for 2002 were $95.72005 increased $36.1 million compared to $68.7$178.8 million in 2001, an increaselargely due to the consolidation of $27.0 million. This increaseKCSM which was primarily attributable to higher net income as well aspartially offset by changes in working capital items relatedrelating to collections on receivables partially offset by reductions in accounts payablethe timing of payments and accrued liabilities.

receipts.

Investing Cash Flows.  Net investing cash outflows were $83.6$166.0 million and $34.9$289.5 million during the years ended December 31, 20032006 and 2002,2005, respectively. This $48.7$123.5 million increase in investing cash outflowsdecrease was primarily related to decreased capital expenditures, increased property sales and the sale of Mexrail to TFM for $31.4 million in 2002. During 2003, in contemplationreceipt of the Acquisition, KCS repurchased a 51% interest in Mexrail for $32.7 million. As discussed in “Recent Developments—Mexrail Transactions,” in accordance with a demandMSLLC investment from TFM, KCS sold its interest in Mexrail back to TFM on September 30, 2003 for $32.7 million. As a result of these two Mexrail transactions in 2003 offsetting each other, there was no net impact to net investing cash outflows during 2003. Therefore, the impact of the cash received in 2002 from the sale of Mexrail resulted in higher comparable investing cash outflows during 2003. Also impacting netNS.
Net investing cash outflows for 2003 was approximately $9.32005 decreased $87.3 million from 2004 due primarily to the investments in Mexrail and Grupo KCSM in 2004. During 2005, KCS capital expenditures increased $158.5 million, of costs associated with the Acquisition that have been deferredwhich KCSM and included in other investing activities. Additionally, proceeds from the sale of property for 2003 were $5.7 million less than 2002.

Net investing cash outflows were $34.9 million and $55.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. This variance of $20.8 million was primarily caused by an increase of $31.1 million of proceeds received from the sale of investments and a $3.8 million decrease in investment in and loans to affiliates. In the first quarter of 2002, the Company sold its 49% interest in Mexrail to TFM for approximately $31.4contributed $100.6 million. The proceeds from the sale exceeded the Company’s carrying value of Mexrail by $11.2 million. The Company recognized a gain of $4.4 million on the sale while the remaining $6.8 million in excess proceeds was deferred. The Company used the proceeds from the sale of Mexrail to reduce debt. These

Financing Cash Flows.  Financing cash inflows were partially offset by a $13.8 million increase in capital expenditures compared to 2001.

Generally, operating cash flows and borrowings under lines of credit have been used to finance property acquisitions and investments in and loans to affiliates.

Financing Cash Flows. Financing cash outflows are used primarily for the repayment of debt while financing cash inflows are generated from proceedsderived from the issuance of long-term debt, including borrowings under the revolving credit facilities, the issuance of preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of common stock under employee stock plans. During 2003, financingFinancing cash flowsoutflows were also generated throughused for the repayment of debt, the repurchase of KCS’ common stock, the payment of dividends on KCS’ preferred stock and the payment of debt and preferred stock issuance of the Convertible Preferred Stock with net proceeds of $193.0 million.costs. Financing cash flows for 2003, 2002,2006, 2005, and 20012004 were as follows:

• Financing cash outflows for 2006 were $53.6 million, resulting primarily from the repayment of short and long term debt, including amounts related to the Grupo KCSM acquisition, and the costs associated with refinancing debt. During 2006, KCS entered into a new $371.1 million amended and restated credit agreement and used the proceeds to repay all amounts outstanding under the previous credit agreement. KCS also borrowed a net amount of $27.5 million under the Tex-Mex RRIF loan, repaid a net amount of $2.0 million under the KCSR revolving credit facility and repaid other amounts. KCSM issued $175.0 million of 75/8% senior unsecured notes and used the proceeds to purchase $146.0 million of its 101/4% senior unsecured notes and repay $29.0 million under its term loan facility. KCSM also used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
• Financing cash flows for 2005 were $103.2 million, resulting primarily from borrowings under the revolving credit facilities. During 2005 KCS issued $210.0 million of preferred stock and the net proceeds were used to repurchase 9.0 million shares of KCS common stock. KCS also assumed debt under a purchase agreement for 75 locomotives, of which $24.3 million was outstanding at year end, borrowed $21.7 million under the Tex-Mex RRIF loan, and had borrowings of $92.0 million outstanding at year end under the KCSR revolving credit facility. KCSM issued $460.0 million of 93/8% senior unsecured notes, and entered into a $106.0 million credit facility. The proceeds from these last two financings were used by KCSM to repay $443.5 million of senior discount debentures, $31.0 million under a bridge loan, the remaining balance of $67.5 million under the previous credit facility and the costs associated with the transactions.
• Financing cash flows for 2004 were $137.3 million, resulting primarily from borrowings under a new $350.0 million credit agreement consisting of a $250.0 million term loan facility and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. KCS used $100.0 million of the term loan to fund a portion of the escrow account under the acquisition of Grupo KCSM.
• Proceeds from the sale of KCS common stock pursuant to employee stock plans were $8.6 million, $1.7 million and $7.4 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
• Payment of cash dividends were $4.3 million, $8.7 million and $8.7 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Dividends of approximately $0.2 million were paid each year on the 4.0% noncumulative preferred stock; approximately $2.1 million, $8.5 million and $8.5 million of dividends were paid in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, on the Series C Preferred Stock; and approximately $2.0 million of dividends were paid in 2006 on the Series D Preferred Stock. Cumulative dividends in arrears were paid February 15, 2007. Refer to Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K.


45

Borrowings of $200 million and $35.0 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. There were no borrowings during 2003. Proceeds from the issuance of debt in June 2002 were used to refinance term debt. In 2001, borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility were used to fund payments on term debt.

Repayment of indebtedness in the amounts of $59.2 million, $270.9 million and $51.3 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Repayment of indebtedness is generally funded through operating cash flows and proceeds from the disposals of property. In 2003, the repayment of debt was funded through operating cash flows, proceeds from the disposal of property and the proceeds received from the Convertible Preferred Stock. In 2002, the repayment of indebtedness was funded from the proceeds from the issuance of debt, as well as operating cash flows and proceeds from the disposals of certain assets. In 2001, the repayment of indebtedness was funded through borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility, as well as operating cash flows and proceeds from the disposals of property.

Payment of debt issuance costs $5.7 million and $0.4 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. In 2002, the Company paid $5.7 million of debt issuance costs related to the $200 million offering in June 2002 of 7½% senior notes due June 15, 2009 (“7½% Notes”). There were no debt issuance costs in 2003.

Proceeds from the sale of KCS common stock pursuant to employee stock plans of $5.3 million, $10.3 million and $8.9 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Payment of cash dividends of $4.7 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Approximately $4.5 million of dividends were paid in 2003 relating to the Convertible Preferred Stock.


Contractual ObligationsObligations.

The following table outlines the Company’s material obligations under long-term debt, operating lease and other contractual commitments aton December 31, 2003.2006(in millions). Typically, payments for theseoperating leases, other contractual obligations and interest on long-term debt are funded through operating cash flows. Principal payment obligations on long-term debt are typically refinanced by issuing new long-term debt. If operating cash flows are not sufficient, funds received from other sources, including borrowings under credit facilities and proceeds from property and other asset dispositions might also be available. These obligations are customary transactions similar to those entered into by others in the transportation industry. The CompanyKCS anticipates refinancing certain parts of itsthe long-term debt prior to maturity.

   Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations


  Total

  Less than
1 Year


  2-3 Years

  4-5 Years

  After
5 Years


   (dollars in millions)

Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)

  $523.4  $9.9  $17.0  $295.5  $201.0

Operating leases

   402.8   56.2   91.5   71.5   183.6

Other contractual obligations(a)

   86.8   5.5   18.9   11.0   51.4
   

  

  

  

  

Total contractual obligations

  $1,013.0  $71.6  $127.4  $378.0  $436.0
   

  

  

  

  


                     
  Payments Due by Period    
     Less Than
  1-3
  3-5
    
  Total  1 Year  Years  Years  Thereafter 
 
                     
Long-term debt (including interest and capital lease obligations)(i) $2,496.7  $243.4  $697.6  $351.0  $1,204.7 
Operating leases  958.6   123.6   205.5   167.9   461.6 
Other contractual obligations(ii)  508.7   89.3   130.6   94.8   194.0 
                     
Total contractual obligations $3,964.0  $456.3  $1,033.7   613.7  $1,860.3 
                     
(a)
(i)Includes current and long-term liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition.
(ii)Other contractual obligations includesinclude purchase commitments and certain maintenance agreements.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into long-term contractual requirements for future goods and services needed for the operations of the business. Such commitments are not in excess of expected requirements and are not reasonably likely to result in performance penalties or payments that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity.
The Company is party to three utilization leases covering 888 railcars where car hire revenue as defined in the lease agreements is shared between the lessor and the Company. The leases expire at various times through 2011. Amounts that may be due to lessors under these utilization leases vary from month to month based on car hire rental with the minimum monthly cost to the Company being zero. Accordingly, the utilization leases have been excluded from contractual obligations above.
Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsArrangements.

As further described in Note 3 to KCS’sthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K, the Company KCSR holds a 50%fifty percent interest in Southern Capital, a joint venture that provides the Company with access to equipment financing alternatives.Capital. Southern Capital’s principal operations are the acquisition and leasing of equipment including locomotives, rolling stock and other railroad equipment and the leasing thereof to the Company.equipment. On June 25, 2002, Southern Capital partially refinanced the outstanding balance of certain debt through the issuance of 5.7% pass through trust certificates and proceeds from the sale of 50 locomotives. These pass through trust certificates are secured by all of the locomotives and rolling stock owned by Southern Capital and rental payments payable by KCSR under the operating and financing leases of the equipment owned by Southern Capital. As Southern Capital is a 50%fifty percent owned unconsolidated joint venture accounted for under the equity method, this debt is not reflected in KCS’sKCS’ Consolidated Balance Sheets which are included in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K.

Also,

PCRC, as described in Note 3, has the concession to KCS’s Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, underreconstruct and operate the Panama Canal Railway. Under the terms of thea loan agreement with IFC,International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) the Company is a guarantor for up to $5.6$4.4 million of associated debt. Also, if PCRC terminates the concession contract without the IFC’s consent, the CompanyKCS is a guarantor for up to 50%half of the outstanding senior loans. The Company is also a guarantor for up to $1.8$0.5 million of thePCRC equipment loans and capital leases, and has issued two irrevocable letters of credit totaling approximately $100,000 relating$2.0 million to fulfill the other capital leases.Company’s fifty percent guarantee of a approximately $4.0 million equipment loan.


46


Capital ExpendituresExpenditures.

Capital improvements for KCSR roadway track structures have historically been funded with cash flows from operations and external debt. The Companyoperations. During 2005, however, KCS used borrowings under its revolving credit facility to fund an expanded capital expenditure program. KCS has historically used equipment trust certificates for major

purchases of locomotives and rolling stock, while using internally generated cash flows or leasing for other equipment. Through itsequipment capital expenditures. The Southern Capital joint venture the Company hasprovides the ability to financelease-finance railroad equipment, and therefore, KCS has increasingly used lease-financing alternatives for its locomotives and rolling stock.

The following table summarizes the cash capital expenditures by type for 2003, 2002the consolidated operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, KCSR and 2001, respectively.

Capital Expenditure Category


  2003

  2002

  2001

   (dollars in millions)

Track infrastructure

  $50.5  $40.2  $38.0

Locomotives, freight cars and other equipment

   14.0   14.9   14.2

Information technology

   3.1   5.8   10.0

Facilities and improvements

   4.7   14.8   1.5

Other

   6.7   4.1   2.3
   

  

  

Total capital expenditures

  $79.0  $79.8  $66.0
   

  

  

Mexrail for the year ended 2005 and KCSM for the last nine months of 2005, and KCSR only for 2004(in millions).

             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Track infrastructure $100.4  $190.1  $57.2 
Locomotives, freight cars and other equipment  40.4   41.8   22.6 
Facilities and capacity projects  70.7   1.7   27.4 
Information technology  15.4   12.2   5.4 
Other  14.9   29.9   4.6 
             
Total capital expenditures $241.8  $275.7  $117.2 
             
Internally generated cash flows and borrowings under the Company’s lines of credit were used to finance capital expenditures. Internally generated cash flows and borrowings are expected to be used to fund cash capital programsexpenditures planned for 2004,2007, currently estimated at approximately $108$270 million.

Maintenance and Repairs.
KCSR Maintenance

KCSR,and KCSM, like allother railroads, isare required to maintain itstheir own property infrastructure. Portions of roadway and equipment maintenance costs are capitalized and other portions are expensed (as components of material and supplies, purchased services and others), as appropriate. Maintenance and capital improvement programs are in conformity with GAAP as well as with the Federal Railroad Administration’s track standards recognized within the rail industry and are accounted for in accordance with applicablerelated regulatory accounting rules. Managementagencies. KCS expects to continue to fundfunding roadway and equipment maintenance expenditures with internally generated cash flows. Maintenance expenses (exclusive of amounts capitalized) for way and structure (roadbed, rail, ties, bridges, etc.) and equipment (locomotives and rail cars) for the three years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively, as a percentage of KCSR revenues were as follows:

   KCSR Maintenance

 
   Way and Structure

  Equipment

 
   Amount

  Percent of
Revenue


  Amount

  Percent of
Revenue


 
   (dollars in millions) 

2003

  $41.1  7.1% $42.5  7.3%

2002

   43.6  7.7   48.2  8.5 

2001

   43.9  7.5   44.8  7.7 

Capital StructureStructure.

Components of the Company’s capital structure are as follows.

   2003

  2002

 
   (dollars in millions) 

Debt due within one year

  $9.9  $10.0 

Long-term debt

   513.5   572.6 
   


 


Total debt

   523.4   582.6 

Stockholders’ equity

   963.7   752.9 
   


 


Total debt plus equity

  $1,487.1  $1,335.5 
   


 


Total debt as a percent of total debt plus equity (“debt ratio”)

   35.2%  43.6%
   


 


follow(in millions):

         
  2006  2005 
 
Debt due within one year(i) $92.8  $116.3 
Long-term debt(ii)  1,664.2   1,744.3 
         
Total debt  1,757.0   1,860.6 
Stockholders’ equity  1,582.4   1,426.2 
         
Total debt plus equity $3,339.4  $3,286.8 
         
Debt ratio(total debt as a percent of total debt plus equity)
  52.6%  56.6%
(i)Includes current liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition.
(ii)Includes long-term liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition.
The Company’s consolidated debt ratio as ofon December 31, 2003 decreased 8.42006, improved 4.0 percentage points compared to December 31, 2002 as a result of an increase in stockholders’ equity and a decrease in debt.2005. Total consolidated debt decreased $59.2 million as a result of net repayments of long-term debt. Stockholders’ equity increased $210.8$103.6 million, primarily as a result of net proceeds received frompayments of $75.4 million of debt related to the Grupo KCSM acquisition and KCSM’s payments of $55.4 million on the revolver and term loans. These debt payments were offset by the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock of $193.0$27.5 million in 2003. In addition, stockholders’ equity increased as a result of 2003 net income of $12.2 million andon the issuance of common stock under employee stock plans partially offset by dividends on preferred stock.Tex-Mex RRIF loan.


47


Shelf Registration Statements and Public Securities Offerings.The Company
KCS currently has twothree shelf registration statements on file with the SEC (“Initial Shelf”—Registration No. 33-69648; “Second Shelf”— RegistrationNo. 333-61006; “Third Shelf” —Registration No. 333-61006)333-130112). Securities in the aggregate amount of $300 million remain available under the Initial Shelf and securities in the aggregate amount of $450 million remain available under the Second Shelf. The Third Shelf was filed in accordance with the securities offering reform rules of the SEC that allow well known seasoned issuers to register an unspecified amount of different types of securities on an immediately effectiveForm S-3 registration statement. On December 9, 2005, the Company completed the sale and issuance of 210,000 shares of its Series D Preferred Stock pursuant to the Third Shelf. There remains an unspecified amount of securities available under the Third Shelf. To date, no securities have been issued under either the Initial Shelf or Second Shelf.

Amendment of Credit Agreement.During 2003, the Company received approval from its lenders for two separate amendments to certain provision As a consequence of the Amended KCS Credit Facility dated June 12, 2002. The Company requested the first amendment in order to provide flexibility in structuring the funding for the transaction to acquire the Mexican government’s interest in TFM as further discussed in “Recent Developments—Mexican Government’s Put Rights with Respect to TFM Stock.” The Company entered into a second amendment in which the lenderslate filing of the Amended2005Form 10-K, KCS Credit Facility specifically approved (i) the Company’s investment in further equity interestsis ineligible to use any of Grupo TFM and in equity interests representing 51% of Mexrail’s issued and outstanding capital stock and (ii) the usethese shelf registration statements until it has timely filed all periodic reports required under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Company’s cash to acquire Mexrail in connection withExchange Act during the proposed Acquisition.

Overall Liquidity

As part of the Amended KCS Credit Facility, the Company has financing available under the Revolving Credit Facility, which has a maximum borrowing amount of $100 milliontwelve calendar months and matures on January 11, 2006. As of December 31, 2003, no amounts had been borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility. Further, no amounts have been borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility during 2004. The Amended KCS Credit Facility contains, among other provisions, various financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with these provisions, including the financial covenants as of December 31, 2003. As a result of these financial covenants, the Company’s borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility may be restricted.

On March 1, 2004, the Company repaid approximately $38.5 million of term debt (“Term B Loan”) under the Amended KCS Credit Facility using cash on-hand. After consideration of this repayment, the outstanding balance under the Term B Loan was $60 million. The Company is currently in the process of refinancing the Amended KCS Credit Facility, including the Revolving Credit Facility. Under the proposed terms of the new senior secured credit facility (“2004 KCS Credit Facility”), the Company expects to borrow $150 million under a new term loan due March 2008 (“2004 Term B Loan”). Additionally, the 2004 KCS Credit Facility provides for a new revolving credit facility, which expires in March 2007, with a maximum borrowing amount of $100 million (“2004 Revolving Credit Facility”). The Company does not anticipate any borrowing under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2004. The Company has received firm commitment letters from various banks and institutional investors committing to fully fund the new loans and agreeing to the term sheet of the 2004 KCS Credit Facility. The commitments are subject only to proper documentation of the new facility. KCS management expects to close this refinancing transaction prior to March 31, 2004. If, however, the 2004 KCS Credit Facility is not consummated on or prior to March 31, 2004, the Company may be in technical default of certain of its existing financial covenants under the Amended KCS Credit Facility.

Prior to or at the same time as the completion of the refinancing transaction, management expects to use $60 million of cash on-hand to repay the existing Term B Loan. The $150 million of proceeds from the 2004 Term B Loan is expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including financing a portion of the Acquisition, ifmonth after the lateForm 10-K filing was made. KCS was also ineligible to use the shelf registration statements during the period in which it

occurs. The remaining costs of the Acquisition are expected to be financed using a combination of cash on-hand, available liquidity under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility or other capital market transactions. As further described below in “Recent Developments—Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM from Grupo TMM,” the Company has not yet determined whether it would exercise its right failed to pay up to $80 million ofdividends on its 4% Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock. KCS paid the cash portion ofaccrued and unpaid dividends and current dividends on the Acquisition purchase price by delivering up to 6,400,000 common shares. Also see “Recent Developments—Dispute over Acquisition Agreement.” As a result of the refinancing transaction described above, the Company expects to report a charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2004 of approximately $4 million related to the write-off of existing deferred financing costs.

As discussed in “Recent Developments—Mexican Government’s Put Rights with Respect to TFMSeries C Preferred Stock” Grupo TMM and KCS, or either Grupo TMM or KCS, could be required to purchase the Mexican government’s interest in TFM. If KCS and Grupo TMM, or either KCS or Grupo TMM individually had been required to purchase the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM, the total purchase price would have been approximately $467.7 million as of December 31, 2003. The Company is exploring various alternatives for financing this transaction. It is anticipated that this financing, if necessary, can be accomplished using the Company’s ability to access the capital markets. No commitments for such financing have been obtained at this time.

The Company believes, basedSeries D Preferred Stock on current expectations, that its cash and other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to capital markets, borrowing capacity, and other available financing resources are sufficient to fund anticipated operating, capital and debt service requirements and other commitments through 2004. Also, if necessary, managementFebruary 15, 2007. KCS believes it will be ableeligible to obtainuse the necessary financingshelf registration statements commencing May 1, 2007, provided KCS continues to fundpay dividends on its preferred stock, timely files all periodic reports required under the AcquisitionExchange Act and otherwise meets the purchase of the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM. The Company’s operating cash flows and financing alternatives, however, can be impacted by various factors, some of which are outside of the Company’s control. For example, if the Company were to experience a substantial reduction in revenues or a substantial increase in operating costs or other liabilities, its operating cash flows could be significantly reduced. Additionally, the Company is subject to economic factors surrounding capital markets and the Company’s ability to obtain financingrequirements for short-form registration under reasonable terms is subject to market conditions. Further, the Company’s cost of debt can be impacted by independent rating agencies, which assign debt ratings based on certain credit measurements such as interest coverage and leverage ratios. During 2003, both Standard Poor’s Rating Services and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) downgraded the debt ratings of KCS. Moody’s also downgraded the Company’s debt ratings in 2004. These reductions in the Company’s debt ratings did not have any impact on the Company’s interest rates or financial covenant ratios, but could adversely impact borrowing costs in the future.

Form S-3.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The

KCS’ accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company are in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes that the following accounting policies and estimates are critical to an understanding of the Company’sKCS’ historical and future performance. Management has discussed the development and selection of the following critical accounting estimates related with the Audit Committee of the Company’sKCS’ Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the selection, application and disclosure of the Company’s related disclosures.

critical accounting policies and estimates.

Depreciation of Property Plant and EquipmentEquipment.

The railroad industry is extremely capital intensive. Plant maintenanceMaintenance and the depreciation of operating assets constitutesconstitute a substantial operating expense for the Company,KCS, as well as the railroad industry as a whole. The Company capitalizes costs relating to additions and replacements of property plant and equipment, including certain overhead costs representing the indirect costs associated with construction and depreciates itimprovement projects. Overhead factors are periodically reviewed and adjusted to reflect current costs using the full absorption method. All of these costs are depreciated using the group method consistent with industry standards and rules established by the STB. The cost of property plant and equipment normally retired, less salvage value, is charged to depreciation expense over the estimated life of the

operating assets using compositegroup straight-line rates for financial statement purposes. The STB approves the depreciation rates used by KCSR (excluding the amortization of computer software). but not for KCSM. Both KCSR and KCSM periodically conductsconduct studies of depreciation rates for properties and equipment and implements approved changes, as necessary, to depreciation rates. These studies take into consideration the historical retirement experience of similar assets, the current condition of the assets, current operations and potential changes in technology, estimated salvage value of the assets, and industry regulations. For all other consolidated subsidiaries, depreciation is derived based upon the asset value in excess of estimated salvage value using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets for financial reporting purposes. Depreciation is based upon estimates of the useful lives of assets as well as their net salvage value at the end of their useful lives. Estimation of the useful lives of assets that are long-lived as


48


well as their salvage value requires significant management judgement.judgment. Accordingly, management believes that accounting estimates related to depreciation expense are critical.

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,

Currently, KCSR and 2001, no significant changes were made to the depreciation rates applied to operating assets, the underlying assumptions related to estimates of depreciation, or the methodology applied. Currently, the Company depreciates itsKCSM depreciate operating assets, including road and structures, rolling stock and equipment, and capitalized leases generally over a range of 3 to 12050 years depending upon the estimated life of the particular asset. The Company amortizes computer software over a range of 3 to 12 years depending upon the estimated useful life of the software. In addition to the adjustment to rates as a result of the depreciation studies, certain other events could occur that would materially effectaffect the Company’s estimates and assumptions related to depreciation. Unforeseen changes in operations or technology could substantially alter management’s assumptions regarding the Company’sKCS’ ability to realize the return of its investment in operating assets and, therefore, affect the amount of depreciation expense to charge against both current and future revenues. Because depreciation expense is a function of analytical studies made of property, plant and equipment, subsequent studies could result in different estimates of useful lives and net salvage values. If future depreciation studies yield results indicating that the Company’s assets have shorter lives as a result of obsolescence, physical condition, changes in technology or changes in net salvage values, the estimate of depreciation expense could increase. Likewise, if future studies indicate that assets have longer lives, the estimate of depreciation expense could decrease.
KCSR Depreciation Review.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, KCSR engaged a civil engineering firm with expertise in railway property usage to conduct a study to evaluate depreciation rates for properties and equipment. The study centered on evaluating actual historical replacement patterns to assess future lives and indicated that KCSR was depreciating its property over shorter periods than the assets were actually used, as estimated by the study. The effect of this change in estimate was a $3.0 million decrease in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006.
KCSM Depreciation Review.  For the year ended December 31, 2003, consolidated2005, KCSM adopted the group depreciation method for consistency with KCSR during 2005. Accordingly, changes were made to certain historical depreciation rates. Unlike KCSR, KCSM depreciation rates are not subject to the approval of the STB, accordingly, the changes to the depreciation rates were applied in 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2005, KCSM engaged a civil engineering firm with expertise in railway property usage to conduct an analysis of depreciation rates for properties and equipment. The analysis centered on evaluating actual historical replacement patterns to assess future lives and indicated that KCSM was depreciating its property over shorter periods than the assets were actually utilized. As a result, depreciation expense was $64.3recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005 reflected an adjustment totaling $5.5 million, representing 11.6% of consolidated operating expenses. If the estimated lives of all assets being depreciated were increased by one year, the consolidatedto reduce depreciation expense would have decreasedas recorded in the second and third quarters of 2005. Concession rights and related assets are amortized over the shorter of their remaining useful lives as determined by approximately $2.5 millionthe KCSM depreciation review or 3.8%. If the estimated liveslife of all assets being depreciated were decreased by one year, the consolidated depreciation expense would have increased by approximately $2.8 million or 4.4%.

Concession.

Provision for Environmental RemediationRemediation.

The

As further described in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K, the Company’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The major environmental laws to which the Company is subject, include, among others, the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA,” also known as the Superfund law), the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act. CERCLA can impose joint and several liability for cleanup and investigation costs, without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on current and predecessor owners and operators of a site, as well as those who generate, or arrange for the disposal of, hazardous substances. The risk of incurring environmental liability is inherentregulations in the railroad industry. The Company owns property that is, or has been, used for industrial purposes. Use of these properties may subject the Company to potentially material liabilities relating to the investigationU.S. and cleanup of contaminants, claims alleging personal injury, or property damage as the result of exposures to, or release of, hazardous substances.

The CompanyMexico. KCS conducts studies, as well as site surveys, to determine the extent of environmental damage and the necessary requirements to remediate this damage. These studies incorporate the analysis of our internal environmental engineering staff and consultation with legal counsel. From these studies and surveys, a range of estimates of the costs involved is derived and a liability and related expense for environmental remediation is

recorded within this range. The Company’s recorded liabilities for these issues represent its best estimates (on an undiscounted basis) of remediation and restoration costs that may be required to comply with present laws and regulations.derived. These cost estimates are based on forecasts of the total future direct costs related to environmental remediation. These estimatesremediation and change periodically as additional or better information becomes available as to the extent of site remediation required, if any. In addition,KCS accrues for the cost of remediation where the obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably estimated.

Cost estimates can be influenced by advanced technologies related to the detection, appropriate remedial course of action and anticipated cost can influence these estimates.cost. Certain changes could occur that would materially affect the Company’smanagement’s estimates and assumptions related to costs for environmental remediation. If the CompanyKCS becomes subject to more stringent environmental remediation costs at known sites, if the Company discovers additional contamination, discovers previously unknown sites, or becomes subject to related personal or property damage, the CompanyKCS could incur materialadditional costs that could be significant in connection with its environmental remediation. Accordingly,


49


management believes that estimates related to the accrual of environmental remediation liabilities are critical to the Company’sKCS’ results of operations.

For

Environmental remediation expense was $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, the expense related to environmental remediation2006, and was $0.5 million and is included asin purchased services expense on the consolidated statements of income. Additionally, as of December 31, 2003, the Company has2006, KCS had a total liability recorded for environmental remediation of $4.2$7.8 million. This amount was derived from a range of reasonable estimates based upon the Company’s studies and site surveys described above and in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies” (“SFAS 5”). For environmental remediation sites known as of December 31, 2003, if the highest estimate from the range (based upon information presently available) were recorded, the total estimated liability would have increased $4.4 million in 2003.

5.

Provision for Casualty ClaimsClaims.

Due to the nature of railroad operations, claims related to personal injuries and third party liabilities resulting from crossing collisions and derailments, as well as claims related to personal property damage and other casualties, is a substantial expense to the Company. Employees are compensated for work related personal injury claims according to provisions contained within the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”).KCS. Claims are estimated and recorded for known reported occurrences as well as for incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) occurrences. Consistent with the general practice within the railroad industry, the Company’s estimated liability for these casualty expenses is actuarially determined on an undiscounted basis. In estimating the liability for casualty claims, the CompanyKCS obtains an estimate from an independent third party actuarial firm, which calculates an estimate using historical experience and estimates of claim costs as well as numerous assumptions regarding factors relevant to the derivation of an estimate of future claim costs. For other occupational injury claims, an assessment is made on a case-by-case basis in accordance with SFAS 5.

Personal injury and casualty claims are subject to a significant degree of uncertainty, especially estimates related to IBNRincurred but not reported personal injuries for which a party has yet to assert a claim and, therefore, the degree to which injuries have been incurred and the related costs have not yet been determined. Additionally, in estimating costs related to casualty claims, management must make assumptions regarding future costs. The cost of casualty claims is significantly related to numerous factors, including the severity of the injury, the age of the claimant, and the legal jurisdiction.claim. In deriving an estimate of the provision for casualty claims, management must make assumptions related to substantially uncertain matters. Additionally, changesmatters (injury severity, claimant age and legal jurisdiction). Changes in the assumptions made inused for actuarial studies could potentially have a material effect on the estimate of the provision for casualty claims. Accordingly, managementManagement believes that the accounting estimate related to the liability for personal injuries and other casualty claims is critical to the Company’sKCS’ results of operations.

See also Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K.

For the year ended December 31, 2003, the provision for2006, casualty events was approximately $35.4expense equaled $33.8 million and was included in casualties and insurance expense in the consolidated statements of income. Additionally,Based on the methods described above and information available as of December 31, 2003,2006, the Company had a total liability recorded for casualty claims of approximately $49.5was $114.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the provision for casualty expense represented 6.4% of consolidated operating expenses. For purposes of earnings sensitivity analysis, if the December 31, 20032006 reserve were adjusted (increased or decreased) by 10%, casualty expense would have changed $5.0change $11.4 million.

Provision for Income TaxesTaxes.

Deferred income taxes represent a substantial liability of the Company.KCS. For financial reporting purposes, management determines the Company’s current tax liability, as well as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Inliabilities, in accordance with the liability method of accounting for income taxes as specified in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 “AccountingAccounting for Income Taxes,Taxes.theThe provision for income taxes is the sum of income taxes both currently payable and deferred into the future. Currently payable income taxes represent the liability related to the Company’sKCS’ U.S., state and Mexican income tax returnreturns for the current year and anticipated tax payments resulting from income tax audits while the net deferred tax expense or benefit represents the change in the balance of deferred tax assets or liabilities as reported on the balance sheet. The changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the changes in differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of assets and liabilities for tax purposes as measured byusing the enacted tax rates that management estimates will be in effect when these differences reverse. In addition, the tax provision for Mexico is further complicated by the impacts of inflation as well as the exchange rate, both of which can have a significant impact on the calculation. In addition to estimating the future tax rates applicable to the reversal of tax differences, management must also make certain assumptions regarding whether tax differences are permanent or temporary. If the differences are temporary, management must estimate the timing of their reversal, and whether taxable operating income in future periods will be sufficient


50


to fully recognize any gross deferred tax assets of the Company.KCS. Accordingly, management believes that the estimateestimates related to the provision for income taxes is critical to the Company’s results of operations.

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, management made no material changes in its assumptions regarding the determination of the provision for income taxes. However, certain events could occur that would materially affect the Company’s estimates and assumptions regarding deferred taxes. Changes in current tax laws and applicable enacted tax rates could affect the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, thereby impacting the Company’s income tax provision. Additionally, significant declines in taxable operating income could materially impact the realizable value of deferred tax assets.

As of December 31, 2003, the Company’s financial reporting basis exceeded the tax basis of its investment in Grupo TFM by $92.1 million. Management has not provided a deferred income tax liability for the income taxes, if any, that would become payable upon the realization of this basis difference because the Company considers Grupo TFM to be a foreign corporate joint venture and anticipates that Grupo TFM’s earnings will be permanently invested in Grupo TFM. Likewise the Company has no plans to realize this basis differential by a sale of its investment in Grupo TFM. If management were to change this assumption in determining its provision for deferred taxes, the impact on earnings could be significant. If the Company were to realize this basis difference in the future by a receipt of dividends or the sale of its investment in Grupo TFM, as of December 31, 2003, the Company could incur additional gross federal income taxes of approximately $32.2 million, which may be partially or fully offset by Mexican income taxes and could be available to reduce U.S. federal income taxes at such time.

For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company’s income tax benefit was $2.8 million consisting of $0.3 million for the current tax provision and $3.1 million for the deferred tax benefit. Changes in management’s estimates and assumptions regarding the enacted tax rate applied to deferred tax assets and liabilities, the ability to realize the value of deferred tax assets, or the timing of the reversal of tax basis differences could potentially impact the provision for income taxes. Changes in these assumptions could potentially change the effective tax rate. A 10% change in the effective tax rate from 23.7% (exclusive of the equity in earnings of Grupo TFM—see “Results of Operations—Income Tax Provision (Benefit)”) to 33.7% would increase the current year income tax benefit approximately $1 million.

Equity in Net Earnings of Grupo TFMOther.

Equity in the earnings of unconsolidated affiliates is a significant component of the Company’s net income. For financial reporting purposes, the Company records equity in the net earnings of its unconsolidated affiliates in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18 “The Equity Method of

Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.”For the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM, the equity in net earnings recorded by the Company is materially impacted by estimates included in Grupo TFM’s tax computation. These estimates are dependent to a certain extent on changes in Mexican tax rates, fluctuations in the Mexican rate of inflation and changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso. To determine the income tax provision (benefit) and the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities, Grupo TFM and KCS management must make assumptions and estimates related to material amounts into the future. Accordingly, management of the Company believes that the accounting estimate made by Grupo TFM and KCS management related to Grupo TFM’s provision for income taxes is a “critical accounting estimate” due to its significant impact on the Company’s results of operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2001, there were no material changes in the assumptions regarding the determination of the provision for income taxes for Grupo TFM. Effective January 1, 2002, Mexico implemented changes in its income tax laws that had an impact on the Company’s equity in Grupo TFM’s earnings reported under the equity method of accounting. Beginning in 2003, the Mexican corporate income tax rate is being reduced from 35% to 32% in one-percent increments. As a result of this change in tax rates, management’s assumptions and estimates related to the value of Grupo TFM’s net tax asset changed, and the value of Grupo TFM’s tax asset was reduced by approximately $7.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2002, resulting in an impact of approximately $2.8 million to the Company. The provision for income taxes and the value of Grupo TFM’s net deferred tax assets could be further impacted by changes in the rate of inflation in Mexico, provisions within Mexican tax law that provide for inflation indexation for tax purposes, as well as changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso. Changes in these estimates could have a material impact on the Company’s equity in earnings of Grupo TFM.

OTHER

Significant Customer. Southwestern Electric Power Company (“SWEPCO”), a subsidiary of American Electric Power, Inc., is the Company’s only customer that accounted for more than 10% of revenues during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Revenues related to SWEPCO during these periods were $64.7 million and $75.9 million, respectively. During 2003, revenues related to SWEPCO were $57.2 million, representing approximately 9.8% of the Company’s revenues. KCSR coal revenues declined in 2002 as a result of a contractual rate reduction for SWEPCO, which became effective on January 1, 2002.

Management Control System.On July 14, 2002, the Company initiated the transition from its legacy operating system to a platform called MCS on KCSR. This state-of-the-art system is designed to provide better analytical tools for management to use in its decision-making processes. MCS, among other things, delivers work orders to yard and train crews to ensure that the service being provided reflects what was sold to the customer. The system also tracks individual shipments as they move across the rail system, compares that movement to the service sold to the customer and automatically reports the shipment’s status to the customer and to operations management. If a shipment falls behind schedule, MCS automatically generates alerts and action recommendations so that corrective action promptly can be initiated.

During the second half of 2002, the Company’s operating results were impacted by higher operating costs and some temporary traffic diversions caused by congestion directly related to the implementation of MCS. The MCS implementation slowed the railroad as employees learned to respond to the data discipline demanded by this new system. The initial difficulties experienced by office and field personnel in transitioning to this new platform led to the congestion issues and operating inefficiencies, which contributed to a decline in 2002 consolidated operating income. By mid-November 2002, however, the Company’s operations began to experience improved transit times and terminal activities as MCS capabilities began to be fully integrated into KCS management processes, and operations were virtually recovered by the end of 2002. Operating statistics, such as terminal dwell time, train velocity and cars on-line, significantly improved during 2003, confirming this recovery. See “Results of Operations” for further information.

Derivative Instruments. The Company  KCS does not engage in the trading of derivatives. The Company’sManagement’s objective for using derivative instruments is to manage its fuel and interest ratecurrency risk andto mitigate the impact of fluctuations in fuel prices and interest rates. The Companytheir fluctuations. KCS accounts for derivative transactions under SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended, as set forth in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K.

In general, the Company enters into derivative transactions in limited situations based on management’s assessment of current market conditions and perceived risks. Management intends to respond to evolving business and market conditions in order to manage risks and exposures associated with the Company’s various operations, and in so doing, so, may enter into such transactions more frequently as deemed appropriate.

Fuel Derivative TransactionsTransactions.

Fuel expense is a significant component of the Company’s operating expenses. Fuel costs are affected by (i) traffic levels, (ii) efficiency of operations and equipment, and (iii) fuel market conditions. To lock-in the price for future fuel purchases to protect the Company’s operating results against adverse fuel price fluctuations, from time to time, KCSRKCS enters into transactions, such as forward purchase commitments and commodity swap transactions.transactions from time to time, to stabilize the price for future fuel purchases and protect operating results against adverse fuel price fluctuations. These derivative instruments hedge against fluctuations in the price of No. 2 Gulf Coast Heating Oil, the commodity on which the Company’s diesel fuel prices are determined. Using thesebased. The use of certain risk management strategies the Company is ableenables risk to limit its riskbe reduced related to rising diesel fuel prices. These derivative transactions are correlatedOn December 31, 2006, KCS was party to market benchmarksfuel swap agreements for 1.3 million gallons of fuel.

Foreign Exchange Matters.  KCSM uses the dollar as its functional currency. Earnings from KCSM included in results of operations reflect any transaction gains and positions are monitored to ensurelosses that they will not exceed actual fuel requirements in any period. See Note 10KCSM records in the Notesprocess of translating certain transactions from pesos to KCS’s Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Interest Rate Derivative Transactions

The Company did not participate in any interest rate derivative transactions during 2003 and had no interest rate hedge transactions outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. At December 31, 2001 the Company had five separate interest rate cap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $200 million. These agreements expired during 2002.

Foreign Exchange Matters. In connection with the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM, matters arise with respect to financial accounting and reporting for foreign currency transactions and for translating foreign currency transactions into U.S. dollars. The CompanyKCS follows the requirements outlined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” (“SFAS 52”), and related authoritative guidance. Grupo TFM uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Equity earnings (losses) from Grupo TFM included in the Company’s results of operations reflect the Company’s share of any such translation gains and losses that Grupo TFM records in the process of translating certain transactions from Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars. Results of the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM are reported under U.S. GAAP while Grupo TFM reports its financial results under IFRS. Because the Company is required to report its equity earnings (losses) in Grupo TFM under U.S. GAAP and Grupo TFM reports under IFRS, differences in deferred income tax calculations and the classification of certain operating expense categories occur.

The Company continues to evaluate existing alternatives with respect to utilizing foreign currency instruments to hedge its U.S.the dollar investment in Grupo TFMKCSM as market conditions change or exchange rates fluctuate. AtAs of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company had no2006, KCSM did not have any outstanding foreign currency hedging instruments.

forward contracts.

Litigation.  The Company and its subsidiaries are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. While the ultimate outcome of theis a party to various legal proceedings involving the Company and administrative actions, all of which are of an ordinary, routine nature and incidental to its subsidiaries cannot be predicted with certainty, it is management’s opinion (after consultation with legal counsel) that the Company’s litigation accrued liabilitiesoperations. Included in these proceedings are adequate. The Company also is a defendant in various matterstort claims brought primarily by current and former employees for job related injuries and by third parties for job

injuries related injury incidents or crossing accidents. The Company isto railroad operations. KCS aggressively defendingdefends these matters and has established liability reserves whichthat management believes are adequate to cover expected costs. Nevertheless, due to the inherent unpredictability of these matters, the Company could incur substantial costs above reserved amounts. The following provides an update on certain more significant cases. See “Recent Developments— Dispute over Acquisition Agreement” for discussion of dispute with TMM over the Acquisition.

Stilwell Tax Dispute. On November 19, 2002, Stilwell, now Janus Capital Group Inc., filed a Statement of Claim against KCS with the American Arbitration Association. This claim involves the entitlement to compensation expense deductions for federal income tax purposes, which are associated with the exercise of certain stock options issued by Stilwell (the “Substituted Options”) in connection with the Spin-off of Stilwell from KCS on July 12, 2000. Stilwell alleges that upon exercise of a Substituted Option, StilwellAlthough it is entitled to the associated compensation expense deductions. Stilwell bases its claim on a letter, dated August 17, 1999, addressed to Landon H. Rowland, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. (the “Letter”), purporting to allow Stilwell to claim such deductions. The Letter was signed by the Vice President and Tax Counsel of Stilwell, who was also at the time the Senior Assistant Vice President and Tax Counsel of KCS, and by Landon H. Rowland, currently a director of KCS and the former non-executive Chairman of Janus Capital Group Inc., who was at that time a director and officer of both Stilwell and KCS.

Stilwell seeks a declaratory award and/or injunction ordering KCS to file and amend its tax returns for the tax year 2000 and subsequent years to reflect that KCS does not claim the associated compensation expense deductions and to indemnify Stilwell against any related taxes imposed upon Stilwell, which allegedly has taken, and plans to take, such deductions. On December 20, 2002, KCS filed an Objection to Stilwell’s Demand for Arbitration and Motion to Dismiss. KCS disputes the validity and enforceability of the Letter. KCS asserts, among other things, that a Private Letter Ruling issued by the Internal Revenue Service on July 9, 1999 provides that KCS subsidiaries are entitled to compensation expense deductions upon exercise of Substituted Options by their employees.

KCS has answered that the claims of Stilwell are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. Given the stage of the proceeding, KCS is unablepossible to predict the outcome but does not expect this matter to result in an adverse financial consequences that would be material to KCS’s net incomeof any legal proceeding, in the event, which it regards as unlikely, that it would not prevail.

Bogalusa Cases. In July 1996, KCSR was named as one of twenty-seven defendants in various lawsuits in Louisiana and Mississippi arising from the explosion of a rail car loaded with chemicals in Bogalusa, Louisiana on October 23, 1995. As a resultopinion of the explosion, nitrogen dioxideCompany’s management, other than those proceedings described in detail below, such proceedings and oxides of nitrogen were released into the atmosphere over parts of that town and the surrounding area allegedly causing evacuations and injuries. Approximately 25,000 residents of Louisiana and Mississippi (plaintiffs) have asserted claims to recover damages allegedly caused by exposure to the released chemicals. On October 29, 2001, KCSR and representatives for its excess insurance carriers negotiated a settlement in principle with the plaintiffs for $22.3 million. A Master Global Settlement Agreement (“MGSA”) was signed in early 2002. During 2002, KCSR made all payments under the MGSA and collected $19.3 million from its excess insurance carriers. Court approval of the MGSA is expected in 2004 from the 22nd Judicial District Court of Washington Parish, Louisiana. KCSR also expects to receive releases from about 4,000 Mississippi plaintiffs in numerous cases pendingactions should not, individually, or in the First Judicial District Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi.

Houston Cases.In August 2000, KCSR and certain of its affiliates were added as defendants in lawsuits pending in Jefferson and Harris Counties, Texas. These lawsuits allege damage to approximately 3,000 plaintiffs as a result of an alleged toxic chemical release from a tank car in Houston, Texas on August 21, 1998. Litigation involving the shipper and the delivering carrier had been pending for some time, but KCSR, which handled the car during the course of its transport, had not previously been named a defendant. On June 28, 2001, KCSR reached a final settlement with the 1,664 plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed in Jefferson County, Texas. In 2002, KCSR settled with virtually all of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed in the 164th Judicial District Court of Harris

County, Texas, for approximately $0.3 million. The remaining plaintiffs have indicated that they intend to retain new counsel, yet to date, KCS has not received any notice of new counsel entering the case.

Environmental Matters. As discussed above in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates,” the Company’s operations, as well as those of its competitors, are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Certain laws and regulations can impose joint and several liability for cleanup and investigation costs, without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on current and predecessor owners and operators of a site, as well as those who generate, or arrange for the disposal of, hazardous substances. The Company does not foresee that compliance with the requirements imposed by the current environmental legislation will impair its competitive capability or result in any material additional capital expenditures, operating or maintenance costs. However, stricter environmental requirements relating to our business, which may be imposed in the future, could result in significant additional costs.

The risk of incurring environmental liability is inherent in the railroad industry. The Company’s operations involve the use and, as part of serving the petroleum and chemicals industry, transportation of hazardous materials. The Company has a professional team available to respond and handle environmental issues that might occur in the transport of such materials. The Company also is a partner in the Responsible Care® program and, as a result, has initiated certain additional environmental, health and safety practices. KCSR performs ongoing review and evaluation of the various environmental programs and issues within the Company’s operations, and, as necessary, takes actions to limit the Company’s exposure to environmental liabilities.

Although the Company is responsible for investigating and remediating contamination at several locations, based on currently available information, the Company does not expect any related liabilities, individually or collectively, toaggregate, have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In the event that the Company becomes subject to more stringent cleanup requirements at these sites, discovers additional contamination, or becomes subject to related personal or property damage claims, the Company could incur material costs in connection with these sites.

KCSR has been named a Potential Responsible Party (PRP) in connection with a former foundry site in Alexandria, Louisiana. A small portion of this property was owned through a former subsidiary during the years 1924 to 1974 and leased to a small foundry operator. The foundry operator, Ruston Foundry, ceased operations in early 1990. The site is on the CERCLA National Priorities List of contaminated sites. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has completed a Record of Decision of the site. Management is in the process of negotiating a settlement with respect to this site and continues to evaluate its potential financial statement impact. Management’s has recorded its best estimate of potential liability of $1.9 million as of December 31, 2003 related to potential remediation costs at this site. Further evaluation is ongoing and any remaining exposure is not expected to have a materialadverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

In 1996,condition.

Reinsurance Litigation.  As the Louisiana Department of TransportationCompany has previously reported, insurance companies who provided insurance to the Company filed an action in federal court in Vermont (“LDOT”the Reinsurance Litigation”) sued KCSR andseeking a number of other defendants in Louisiana state courtdeclaration that they have no obligation to recover cleanup costs incurred by LDOT while constructing Interstate Highway 49 at Shreveport, Louisianaindemnify the Company concerning a particular casualty claim. That claim,(Louisiana Department of TransportationKemp, et al v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, et al.al, Case No. 417190-B in the First Judicial DistrictCircuit Court Caddo Parish, Louisiana).of Jackson County, Missouri (“the Kemp Litigation”) went to trial in September 2006. The cleanup wasCompany reached a settlement with the plaintiffs in the Kemp Litigation. The Company has also reached settlements with various parties, including several of the insurance companies involved in the Reinsurance Litigation, to indemnify the Company for a significant portion of the settlement. The Kemp settlement is fully reflected in the Company’s 2006 financial statements and the Company has no further risk associated with contamination in the area of a former oil refinery site, operated by Crystal Refinery. KCSR’s main line was adjacent to that site. LDOT claims that a 1966 derailment contributed to contamination at the site. However, KCSR management believes that KCSR’s liability exposure with respect to this site is remote.

litigation. The Company records liabilitiesis however continuing the Reinsurance Litigation against certain other insurance companies, seeking to establish their obligation to indemnify the Company for remediation and restoration costs related to past activities whentheir share of the Company’s obligation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of ongoing compliance activities to current operations are expensed as incurred. The Company’s recorded liabilitiessettlement with respect to these various environmental issues represent its best estimates of remediation and restoration costs that may be required to comply with present laws and regulations. Although these costs cannot be predicted with certainty,

management believes that the ultimate outcome of identified matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Kemp.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements. See  Refer to Note 2 into the Notes to KCS’s Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K for information relative to recent accounting pronouncements.


51


Regulatory Influence. In addition to the environmental agencies mentioned above, KCSR’s operations are regulated by the STB, various state regulatory agencies, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”). State agencies regulate some aspects of rail operations with respect to health and safety and in some instances, intrastate freight rates. OSHA has jurisdiction over certain health and safety features of railroad operations. The Company does not foresee that regulatory compliance under present statutes will impair its competitive capability or result in any material effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Inflation.Cautionary Information. Inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company’s operations in the past three years. U.S. GAAP requires the use of historical costs. Replacement cost and related depreciation expense of the Company’s property would be substantially higher than the historical costs reported. Any increase in expenses from these fixed costs, coupled with variable cost increases due to significant inflation, would be difficult to recover through price increases given the competitive environments of the Company’s principal subsidiaries. Higher fuel prices have impacted KCSR’s operating results in 2003, 2002 and 2001. During the two-year period ended December 31, 1999, locomotive fuel expenses represented an average of 6.9% of KCSR’s total costs and expenses compared to 9.2% in 2003, 7.7% in 2002 and 8.8% in 2001. See “Foreign Exchange Matters” above with respect to inflation in Mexico.

CAUTIONARY INFORMATION

The discussions set forth in this Annual Report onForm 10-K may contain statements concerning potential future events. Such forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions bywithin the Company’s management, asmeaning of Section 27A of the dateSecurities Act of this Annual Report, including assumptions about risks1933, as amended and uncertainties faced bySection 21E of the Company.Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, management may make forward-looking statements orally or in other writings, including, but not limited to, in press releases, in the annual report to shareholdersstockholders and in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of such verbs as expects, anticipates, believes“expects,” “anticipates,” “believes” or similar verbs or conjugations of such verbs. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding: expectations as to operational improvements; expectations as to cost savings, revenue growthinvolve a number of risks and earnings; the time by which certain objectives will be achieved; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration; proposed new products and services; expectations that claims, lawsuits, environmental costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, labor negotiations or agreements, or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity; and statements concerning projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or forecasts as to the Company’s business, financial and operational results, and future economic performance, statements of management’s goals and objectives and other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. If any of management’s assumptions prove incorrect or should unanticipated circumstances arise, the Company’s actualuncertainties. Actual results could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. TheSuch differences could be caused by a number of factors or combination of factors including, but not limited to, the factors identified below and the factorsthose discussed above under the headingItem 1A of thisForm 10-K, “Risk Factors.” Readers are strongly encouraged to consider these factors and the following factors when evaluating any forward-looking statements concerning the Company.

Company:

whether the Company is fully successful in executing the Company’s business strategy, including capitalizing on NAFTA trade to generate traffic and increase revenues, exploiting the Company’s

 

domestic opportunities, establishing new• 

fluctuations in the market price for the Company’s common stock;
• KCS’ dividend policy and expanding existing strategic alliancesrestrictions on its ability to pay dividends on its common stock;
• KCS’ high degree of leverage;
• The Company’s potential need for and marketing agreementsability to obtain additional financing;
• KCS’ ability to successfully implement its business strategy, including the strategy to convert customers from using trucking services to rail transportation services;
• the impact of competition, including competition from other rail carriers and providing superiortrucking companies in the United States and Mexico;
• United States, Mexican and global economic, political and social conditions;
• The effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, on the level of trade among the United States, Mexico and Canada;
• uncertainties regarding the litigation KCS faces and any future claims and litigation;
• the effects of employee training, technological improvements and capital expenditures on labor productivity, operating efficiencies and service reliability;
• changes in legal or regulatory requirements in the United States, Mexico or Canada;
• KCS’ ability to generate sufficient cash to pay principal and interest on its debt, meet its obligations and fund its other liquidity needs;
• the effects of adverse general economic conditions affecting customer service;

demand and the industries and geographic areas that produce and consume the commodities KCS carries;
• material adverse changes in economic and industry conditions, both within the United States and Mexico and globally;
• natural events such as severe weather, fire, floods, hurricanes, earthquakes or other disruptions of the Company’s operating systems, structures and equipment or the ability of customers to produce or deliver their products;
• changes in fuel prices;
• KCS’ ability to attract and retain qualified management personnel;
• changes in labor costs and labor difficulties, including work stoppages affecting either operations or customers” abilities to deliver goods for shipment;


52


whether the Company is successful in retaining and attracting qualified management personnel;

• the outcome of claims and litigation, including those related to environmental contamination, personal injuries, and occupational illnesses arising from hearing loss, repetitive motion and exposure to asbestos and diesel fumes;
• acts of terrorism or risk of terrorist activities;
• war or risk of war;
• political and economic conditions in Mexico; and the level of trade between the United States and Mexico;
• legislative, regulatory, or legal developments involving taxation, including enactment of new foreign, federal or state income or other tax rates, revisions of controlling authority, and the outcome of tax claims and litigation.
whether the Company is able to generate cash that will be sufficient to allow it to pay principal and interest on the Company’s debt and meet the Company’s obligations and to fund the Company’s other liquidity needs;

whether the Company is able to complete the Acquisition;

the Company’s ability to satisfy its contingent obligation to purchase shares of TFM, owned by the government of Mexico;

Material adverse changes in economic and industry conditions, both within the United States and globally;

the effects of adverse general economic conditions affecting customer demand and the industries and geographic areas that produce and consume commodities carried;

the effect of NAFTA on the level of U.S.-Mexico trade;

industry competition, conditions, performance and consolidation;

general legislative and regulatory developments, including possible enactment of initiatives to re-regulate the rail industry;

legislative, regulatory, or legal developments involving taxation, including enactment of new federal or state income tax rates, revisions of controlling authority, and the outcome of tax claims and litigation;

changes in securities and capital markets;

natural events suchForward-looking statements speak only as severe weather, fire, floods, earthquakes or other disruptions of the Company’s operating systems, structures and equipment;

any adverse economic or operational repercussions from terrorist activities and any governmental response thereto;

war or risk of war;

changes in fuel prices;

changes in labor costs and labor difficulties, including stoppages affecting either the Company’s operations or the Company’s customers’ abilities to deliver goods to it for shipment; and

the outcome of claims and litigation, including those related to environmental contamination, personal injuries and occupational illnesses arising from hearing loss, repetitive motion and exposure to asbestos and diesel fumes.

date on which they are made. The Company will not update any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report to reflect future events, developments, or developments.other information. If the CompanyKCS does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that the Company will make additional updates with respect theretowill be made regarding that statement or with respect toany other forward-looking statements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures AboutConcerning Market Risk

The Company

KCS utilizes various financial instruments that have certain inherent market risks. Generally,risks, but these instruments have not been entered into for trading purposes. The following information, together with information included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-K and Note 1012 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of thisForm 10-K, which are hereby incorporated by reference, describe the key aspects of certain financial instruments that have market risk to the Company.

KCS.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company’s floating-rateSensitivity.  Floating-rate indebtedness totaled $98.5$381.6 million and $149.3$440.9 million at December 31, 20032006 and 2002,2005, respectively. The Company’s variable rate debt,Two credit agreements, each comprised of a revolving credit facility and a term loan facility, contain variable rate debt which accrues interest based on target interest indexes (e.g., London(London Interbank Offered Rate—“LIBOR,” federal funds rate, etc.)Rate — “LIBOR” or an alternative base rate) plus an applicable spread, as set forth in theeach credit agreement. As a result of the 2002 refinancing of $200 million of variable rate debt with the 7½% Notes, the Company has been able to reduce its sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates compared to previous years. However, givenGiven the balance of $98.5$381.6 million of variable rate debt at December 31, 2003, the Company2006, KCS is still sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. For example, a hypothetical 100 basis points increase in each of the respective target interest indexes would result in additional interest expense of approximately $1.0$3.8 million on an annualized basis for the floating-rate instruments heldissued by the Company as of December 31, 2003.

2006.

Based upon the borrowing rates available to KCS and its subsidiaries for indebtedness with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was approximately $558$1,814.1 million at December 31, 20032006, and $617$1,938.6 million at December 31, 2002.

2005.

Commodity Price Sensitivity

Sensitivity.As described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Other—Operations — Other — Derivative Instruments” of thisForm 10-K, the Company KCS periodically participates in diesel fuel purchase commitment and swap transactions. At December 31, 2003, the Company2006, KCS was a party to seven fuel swap agreements. Based on market prices atagreements for 1.3 million gallons. Subsequent to December 31, 2003, the Company would receive payments from the third party counterparty of approximately $0.9 million on the settlement date of the agreement, representing the excess of the current market price over the agreed upon swap price. If market prices of fuel dropped below the swap price, then2006, KCS would be obligated to pay an amount equal to the difference between the market price and the swap price for each gallon of fuel hedged. At December 31, 2002, the excess of payments to be received or savings to be realized over the market price related to diesel fuel purchase commitments andentered into fuel swap transactions approximated $1.8agreements for another 1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. A hypothetical 10% increase in the price of diesel fuel would have resulted in additional fuel expense of approximately $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

At December 31, 2003, thegallons. The Company heldalso holds fuel inventories for use in normal operations. These inventories wereare not material to the Company’sKCS’ overall financial position. With the exception of the 13% of fuel currently hedged under fuel swap transactions for 2004,2007, fuel costs are expected to mirror market conditions in 2003.

2007. KCS also cushions the impact of increased fuel costs through fuel surcharge revenues from customers. Assuming annual consumption of 145 million gallons, a $0.10 change in the price per gallon of fuel would cause a $14.5 million change in operating expenses.

Foreign Exchange Sensitivity

The Company owns a 46.6% interest in Grupo TFM, incorporated in Mexico. In connection with the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM, matters arise with respect to financial accounting and reporting for foreign currency transactions and for translating foreign currency transactions into U.S. dollars. Grupo TFMSensitivity.  KCSM uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Equity earnings (losses)Earnings from Grupo TFMKCSM included in the Company’s results of operations reflect the Company’s share of any such translationrevaluation gains and losses that Grupo TFMKCSM records in the process of translating certain transactions from Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars. Therefore, the Company has exposure to fluctuations in the value of the Mexican peso. While not currently utilizing foreign currency instruments to hedge the Company’s U.S. KCS’


53


dollar investment in Grupo TFM, the Company continues to evaluateKCSM, existing alternatives are evaluated as market conditions and exchange rates fluctuate. For example, a hypothetical 10% increase in the US dollar to the Mexican peso exchange rate on net monetary assets of Ps.1,652.6 million would result in a translation loss of approximately $13.9 million and a 10% decrease in the exchange rate would result in a translation gain of approximately $17.0 million.
Inflation.  U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require the use of historical cost, which does not reflect the effects of inflation on the replacement cost of property. Due to the capital intensive nature of KCS’ business, the replacement cost of these assets would be substantially greater than the amounts reported under the historical cost basis.


54

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Financial Statements

  Page

Management

 61
56

Financial Statements:

 6257

58
 6359

 6460

 6561

 6662

 6763
Financial Statement Schedules:

Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, are insignificant or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

The combined and consolidated financial statements of Grupo TFMKCSM as of December 31, 20032005 (successor) and 2004 (predecessor) for each of the three years in the periodnine months ended December 31, 20032005 (successor), the three months ended March 31, 2005 (predecessor) and the year ended December 31, 2004 (predecessor) are attached toincorporated by reference into this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1.

annual report.

Management Report on Responsibility forIntroductory Comments
The following Consolidated Financial Reporting

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes ofStatements have been prepared by Kansas City Southern, pursuant to the rules and its subsidiaries were prepared by management in conformityregulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Beginning with generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the circumstances. In preparing theyear ended December 31, 2005, these financial statements management has made judgmentsinclude the results of operations and estimates basedcash flows of Mexrail and Grupo KCSM, which were consolidated on currently available information. Management is responsible for not onlyJanuary 1, 2005, and April 1, 2005, respectively, as a result of the financial information, but also all other informationacquisition of a controlling interest in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Representations contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are consistent with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.

The Company’s financial statementseach entity as of andthese respective dates. Results for the years ended December 31, 2003, 20022006 and 2001 have been audited by its independent accountants, KPMG LLP. Management has made available to the independent accountants all2005 are not indicative of the Company’sexpected results for future periods.


55


Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Kansas City Southern is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial recordsreporting as such term is defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and related data, as well as the minutes of shareholders’ and directors’ meetings. Furthermore, management believes that all representations made to the Company’s independent accountants during their audits were valid and appropriate.

The Company has a formalized system of15d-15(f). KCS’ internal accounting controlscontrol over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguardedto the Company’s management and that itsBoard of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial records are reliable. Management monitorsstatements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the system for compliance,supervision and participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal auditors review and evaluate both internal accounting and operating controls and recommend possible improvements thereto. In addition,control over financial reporting as part of their auditDecember 31, 2006, based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the consolidatedTreadway Commission inInternal Control — Integrated Framework(commonly referred to as the COSO framework). Based on its evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial statements,reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006, based on the independent accountants, review and testcriteria outlined in the internal accounting controls on a selective basis to establishCOSO framework.
Management’s assessment of the extent of their reliance thereon in determining the nature, extent and timing of audit tests to be applied. The internal audit staff coordinates with the independent accountants during the annual auditeffectiveness of the Company’s financial statements.

The Board of Directors pursues its oversight role in the area ofinternal control over financial reporting and internalas of December 31, 2006, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting control through its Audit Committee. This committee, composed solely of qualified non-management directors, meets regularly with the respective independent accountants, management and internal auditors to monitor the proper discharge of responsibilities relative to internal accounting controls and to evaluate the quality of external financial reporting. Both the independent accountants and internal auditors have full and free access tofirm, as stated in their attestation report, which immediately follows this committee.report.


56


Michael R. Haverty

Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer

Ronald G. Russ

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Report of Independent AccountantsRegistered Public Accounting Firm

To the

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Kansas City Southern:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, Kansas City Southern maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 26, 2007


57


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kansas City Southern:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20032006 and 2002,2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003.2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Grupo TransportacionTransportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (Grupo TFM)TFM and currently known as Grupo KCSM), a 46.6% owned investee company as of December 31, 2003 or for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2001.2004. The Company’s investment in Grupo TFM at December 31, 2003 was $392.1 million and its equity in earningsloss of Grupo TFM was $12.3 million and $28.5$2.4 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2003 and 2001, respectively.2004. The financial statements of Grupo TFM as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 20012004 were audited by other auditors whose reports havereport has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Grupo TFM as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2001,2004, is based solely on the reportsreport of the other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States of America.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors for 2003 and 2001 provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits, and the reportsreport of other auditors for 2003 and 2001,2004, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20032006 and 2002,2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20032006, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of America.

accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2003,2006, the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.123R, “Share Based Payment.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
February 26, 2007


58

March 19, 2004


KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOMEKansas City Southern

Years Endedended December 31

Dollars in Millions, Except Share and per Share Amounts

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Revenues

  $581.3  $566.2  $583.2 

Operating expenses

             

Compensation and benefits

   197.8   197.8   192.9 

Depreciation and amortization

   64.3   61.4   58.0 

Purchased services

   63.5   59.6   57.0 

Operating leases

   57.2   55.0   56.8 

Casualties and insurance

   56.4   25.2   42.1 

Fuel

   47.4   38.4   43.9 

Car hire

   10.0   19.7   19.8 

Other

   55.6   61.1   57.3 
   


 


 


Total operating expenses

   552.2   518.2   527.8 
   


 


 


Operating income

   29.1   48.0   55.4 

Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates:

             

Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.

   12.3   45.8   28.5 

Other

   (1.3)  (2.4)  (1.4)

Gain on sale of Mexrail, Inc.

   —     4.4   —   

Interest expense

   (46.4)  (45.0)  (52.8)

Debt retirement costs

   —     (4.3)  —   

Other income

   6.8   17.6   4.2 
   


 


 


Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change

   0.5   64.1   33.9 

Income tax provision (benefit) (Note 6)

   (2.8)  6.9   2.8 
   


 


 


Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

   3.3   57.2   31.1 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes

   8.9   —     (0.4)
   


 


 


Net income

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7 

Preferred stock dividends

   5.9   0.2   0.2 
   


 


 


Net income available to common shareholders

  $6.3  $57.0  $30.5 
   


 


 


Per Share Data

             

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

             

Basic earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of accounting change

  $(0.04) $0.94  $0.53 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes

   0.14   —     (0.01)
   


 


 


Total basic earnings per common share

  $0.10  $0.94  $0.52 
   


 


 


Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

             

Diluted earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of accounting change

  $(0.04) $0.91  $0.51 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes

   0.14   —     (0.01)
   


 


 


Total diluted earnings per common share

  $0.10  $0.91  $0.50 
   


 


 


Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands)

             

Basic

   61,725   60,336   58,598 

Potential dilutive common shares

   —     1,982   2,386 
   


 


 


Diluted

   61,725   62,318   60,984 
   


 


 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

at December 31

Dollars in Millions, Except Share and per Share Amounts

   2003

  2002

 

ASSETS

         

Current Assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $135.4  $19.0 

Accounts receivable, net (Note 4)

   108.2   114.9 

Accounts receivable from related parties

   6.4   3.6 

Inventories

   36.8   34.2 

Other current assets (Note 4)

   21.3   44.5 
   


 


Total current assets

   308.1   216.2 
   


 


Investments (Note 3)

   442.7   423.1 

Properties, net (Note 4)

   1,362.5   1,337.4 

Goodwill

   10.6   10.6 

Other assets

   29.0   21.5 
   


 


Total assets

  $2,152.9  $2,008.8 
   


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

         

Current Liabilities:

         

Debt due within one year (Note 5)

  $9.9  $10.0 

Accounts and wages payable

   45.5   47.7 

Accrued liabilities (Note 4)

   119.4   128.6 
   


 


Total current liabilities

   174.8   186.3 
   


 


Other Liabilities:

         

Long-term debt (Note 5)

   513.5   572.6 

Deferred income taxes (Note 6)

   391.5   392.8 

Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (Note 4)

   109.4   104.2 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3,5,6,7,8,9,10)

         
   


 


Total other liabilities

   1,014.4   1,069.6 
   


 


Stockholders’ Equity (Notes 2,7):

         

$25 par, 4% noncumulative, Preferred stock, 840,000 shares authorized, 649,736 shares issued, 242,170 shares outstanding

   6.1   6.1 

$1 par, Cumulative Preferred stock, 400,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003; 0 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002

   0.4   —   

$.01 par, Common stock, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 73,369,116 shares issued; 62,175,621 and 61,103,015 shares outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively

   0.6   0.6 

Paid in capital

   110.9   —   

Retained earnings

   846.2   748.5 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (0.5)  (2.3)
   


 


Total stockholders’ equity

   963.7   752.9 
   


 


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $2,152.9  $2,008.8 
   


 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31

Dollars in Millions

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR):

             

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

             

Net income

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

             

Depreciation and amortization

   64.3   61.4   58.0 

Deferred income taxes

   (3.1)  21.8   30.4 

Equity in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (11.0)  (43.4)  (27.1)

Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates

   —     —     3.0 

Gain on sale of assets

   (6.2)  (20.1)  (5.8)

Cumulative effect of accounting change

   (8.9)  —     0.4 

Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options

   2.5   4.5   5.6 

Changes in working capital items

             

Accounts receivable

   4.0   12.4   4.0 

Inventories

   (2.5)  (8.8)  6.1 

Other current assets

   15.3   29.8   (19.3)

Accounts and wages payable

   (2.8)  (2.4)  (5.1)

Accrued liabilities

   (12.7)  (20.6)  (26.9)

Other, net

   16.2   3.9   14.7 
   


 


 


Net

   67.3   95.7   68.7 
   


 


 


INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

             

Property acquisitions

   (79.0)  (79.8)  (66.0)

Proceeds from disposal of property

   12.4   18.1   18.1 

Investment in and loans to affiliates

   (40.4)  (4.4)  (8.2)

Proceeds from sale of investments, net

   32.7   31.7   0.6 

Deferred costs related to acquisition of Grupo TFM

   (9.3)  —     —   

Other, net

   —     (0.5)  (0.2)
   


 


 


Net

   (83.6)  (34.9)  (55.7)
   


 


 


FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

             

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   —     200.0   35.0 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (59.2)  (270.9)  (51.3)

Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock

   193.0   —     —   

Debt issuance costs

   —     (5.7)  (0.4)

Proceeds from stock plans

   5.3   10.3   8.9 

Cash dividends paid

   (4.7)  (0.2)  (0.2)

Other, net

   (1.7)  —     (1.8)
   


 


 


Net

   132.7   (66.5)  (9.8)
   


 


 


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

             

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   116.4   (5.7)  3.2 

At beginning of year

   19.0   24.7   21.5 
   


 


 


At end of period

  $135.4  $19.0  $24.7 
   


 


 


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

             

Cash payments (refunds)

             

Interest

  $42.4  $45.5  $49.1 

Income tax payments (refunds)

  $(23.6) $(29.6) $(25.0)

             
  2006  2005  2004 
  In millions, except share
 
  and per share amounts 
 
Revenues $1,659.7  $1,352.0  $639.5 
             
Operating expenses:            
Compensation and benefits  387.7   340.4   213.0 
Depreciation and amortization  155.0   127.7   53.5 
Purchased services  215.2   195.1   62.3 
Casualties and insurance  53.4   103.4   42.4 
Fuel  253.6   206.9   66.4 
Equipment costs  179.7   149.8   50.4 
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing  5.9   41.1    
Other  104.9   125.3   68.0 
             
Total operating expenses  1,355.4   1,289.7   556.0 
             
Operating income  304.3   62.3   83.5 
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates  7.3   2.9   (4.5)
Interest expense  (167.2)  (133.5)  (44.4)
Debt retirement costs  (4.8)  (4.4)  (4.2)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (3.7)  3.5    
VAT/Put settlement gain, net     131.9    
Other income, net  18.7   13.3   17.6 
             
Income before income taxes and minority interest  154.6   76.0   48.0 
Income tax expense (benefit)  45.4   (7.1)  23.6 
             
Income before minority interest  109.2   83.1   24.4 
Minority interest  0.3   (17.8)   
             
Net income  108.9   100.9   24.4 
Preferred stock dividends  19.5   9.5   8.7 
             
Net income available to common shareholders $89.4  $91.4  $15.7 
             
Earnings per share:            
Basic earnings per share $1.20  $1.21  $0.25 
             
Diluted earnings per share $1.08  $1.10  $0.25 
             
Average shares outstanding(in thousands):
            
Basic  74,593   75,527   62,715 
Potential dilutive common shares  17,793   17,220   1,268 
             
Diluted  92,386   92,747   63,983 
             
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


59

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYKansas City Southern

Dollars in Millions, Except per Share AmountsConsolidated Balance Sheets

  $25 Par
Preferred
Stock


 $1 Par
Cumulative
Preferred
Stock


 $.01 Par
Common
Stock


 Paid In
Capital


 Retained
Earnings


  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (loss)


  Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2000

 $6.1 $—   $0.6 $—   $636.7  $—    $643.4 

Comprehensive income:

                        

Net income

              30.7         

Cumulative effect of accounting change

                  (0.9)    

Change in fair market value of cash flow hedge of unconsolidated affiliate

                  (2.0)    

Comprehensive income

                      27.8 

Dividends on $25 Par Preferred Stock ($1.00/share)

              (0.2)      (0.2)

Options exercised and stock subscribed

              9.3       9.3 
  

 

 

 

 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2001

  6.1  —    0.6  —    676.5   (2.9)  680.3 
  

 

 

 

 


 


 


Comprehensive income:

                        

Net income

              57.2         

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges

                  (0.1)    

Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to interest rate swaps

                  0.7     

Comprehensive income

                      57.8 

Dividends on $25 Par Preferred Stock ($1.00/share)

              (0.2)      (0.2)

Options exercised and stock subscribed

              15.0       15.0 
  

 

 

 

 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2002

  6.1  —    0.6  —    748.5   (2.3)  752.9 
  

 

 

 

 


 


 


Comprehensive income:

                        

Net income

              12.2         

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges

                  0.6     

Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to interest rate swaps

                  1.2     

Comprehensive income

                      14.0 

Issuance of preferred stock

     0.4     110.9  81.7       193.0 

Dividends on $25 Par Preferred Stock ($1.00/share)

              (0.2)      (0.2)

Dividends on $1 Par Cumulative Preferred Stock ($11.22/share)

              (4.5)      (4.5)

Options exercised and stock subscribed

              5.2       5.2 

Stock plan shares issued from treasury

              3.3       3.3 
  

 

 

 

 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2003

 $6.1 $0.4 $0.6 $110.9 $846.2  $(0.5) $963.7 
  

 

 

 

 


 


 


December 31
         
  2006  2005 
  In millions, except share amounts 
 
ASSETS
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $79.0  $31.1 
Accounts receivable, net (Note 2)  334.3   315.7 
Restricted funds (Note 2)  26.5    
Inventories  72.5   73.9 
Other current assets (Note 5)  93.7   46.1 
         
Total current assets  606.0   466.8 
Investments (Note 3)  64.9   60.3 
Property and equipment, net (Note 5)  2,452.2   2,298.3 
Concession assets, net (Note 5)  1,303.3   1,360.4 
Deferred tax asset (Note 7)  128.7   152.2 
Other assets  82.2   85.6 
         
Total assets $4,637.3  $4,423.6 
         
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:        
Debt due within one year (Note 6) $41.9  $38.0 
Accounts and wages payable  189.9   124.3 
Current liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition (Note 6)  50.9   78.3 
Accrued liabilities (Note 5)  354.7   333.1 
         
Total current liabilities  637.4   573.7 
         
Other liabilities        
Long-term debt (Note 6)  1,631.8   1,663.9 
Long-term liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition (Note 6)  32.4   80.4 
Deferred income taxes (Note 7)  417.3   409.2 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits  235.7   270.2 
         
Total other liabilities  2,317.2   2,423.7 
         
Minority interest  100.3    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)      
         
Stockholders’ equity (Notes 2,8):        
$25 par, 4% noncumulative, preferred stock, 840,000 shares authorized, 649,736 shares issued, 242,170 shares outstanding  6.1   6.1 
Series C — redeemable cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock, $1 par, 4.25%, 400,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding  0.4   0.4 
Series D — cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock, $1 par, 5.125%, 210,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding  0.2   0.2 
$.01 par, common stock, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 92,863,585 and 91,369,116 shares issued at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively; 75,920,333 and 73,412,081 shares outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively  0.7   0.7 
Paid in capital  523.0   473.1 
Retained earnings  1,050.7   946.1 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  1.3   (0.4)
         
Total stockholders’ equity  1,582.4   1,426.2 
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $4,637.3  $4,423.6 
         
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


60

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSKansas City Southern
Years ended December 31
             
  2006  2005  2004 
  In millions 
 
Operating activities:
            
Net income $108.9  $100.9  $24.4 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  155.0   127.7   53.5 
Deferred income taxes  41.0   (17.3)  35.9 
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing  5.9   41.1    
Equity in undistributed losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates  (7.3)  (2.9)  4.5 
VAT/Put settlement gain     (131.9)   
Minority interest  0.3   (17.8)   
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates  4.5   8.3   8.8 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets  (7.8)  1.0   (3.8)
Changes in working capital items:            
Accounts receivable  (18.6)  5.8   (25.0)
Inventories  0.4   (0.8)  (11.4)
Other current assets  (50.9)  15.7   (2.2)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  44.6   25.2   39.9 
Other, net  (8.5)  23.8   18.1 
             
Net cash provided by operating activities  267.5   178.8   142.7 
             
Investing activities:
            
Capital expenditures  (241.8)  (275.7)  (117.2)
Proceeds from disposal of property  30.0   6.3   4.9 
Contribution from NS for MSLLC (net of change in restricted contribution)  76.5       
Property investments in MSLLC  (37.8)      
Investments in and loans to affiliates  (1.1)  (10.5)  (55.0)
Proceeds from sales of investments, net  8.2   (8.0)  0.5 
Acquisition costs     (10.1)  (9.5)
Cash of Mexrail at date of acquisition     3.0    
Cash of KCSM at date of acquisition     5.5    
Change in other restricted cash        (200.0)
Other, net        (0.5)
             
Net cash used for investing activities  (166.0)  (289.5)  (376.8)
             
Financing activities:
            
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt  616.3   644.7   250.0 
Repayment of long-term debt  (658.5)  (521.5)  (107.6)
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock     203.9    
Debt issuance costs  (15.9)  (16.5)  (3.8)
Proceeds from stock plans  8.6   1.7   7.4 
Repurchase of common stock     (200.4)   
Excess tax benefit realized from options exercised  0.2       
Dividends paid  (4.3)  (8.7)  (8.7)
             
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities  (53.6)  103.2   137.3 
             
Cash and cash equivalents:            
Net increase (decrease) during each year  47.9   (7.5)  (96.8)
At beginning of year  31.1   38.6   135.4 
             
At end of year $79.0  $31.1  $38.6 
             
Supplemental cash flow information:
            
Cash payments (refunds):            
Interest $163.5  $132.8  $42.1 
Income tax refunds (net of payments)  (0.4)  (1.6)  (21.2)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


61


Kansas City Southern
                                 
     $1 Par Cumulative
           Accumulated
    
  $25 Par
  Preferred Stock  $.01 par
        Other
    
  Preferred
  Series C
  Series D
  Common
  Paid in
  Retained
  Comprehensive
    
  Stock  4.25%  5.125%  Stock  Capital  Earnings  Income (Loss)  Total 
  (In millions) 
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
 $6.1  $0.4  $  $0.6  $110.9  $838.2  $(0.5) $955.7 
                                 
Comprehensive income:                                
Net income                      24.4       24.4 
Fair value change of cash flow hedges                          0.2   0.2 
Amortization of interest rate swap loss                          0.5   0.5 
                                 
Comprehensive income                 24.4   0.7   25.1 
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)                      (0.2)      (0.2)
Dividends on series C cumulative preferred stock ($21.25/share)                      (8.5)      (8.5)
Options exercised and stock subscribed                  42.0           42.0 
Stock plan shares issued from treasury                  2.4           2.4 
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2004
  6.1   0.4      0.6   155.3   853.9   0.2   1,016.5 
                                 
Comprehensive income:                                
Net income                      100.9       100.9 
Fair value change of cash flow hedges                          (1.1)  (1.1)
Amortization of interest rate swap loss                          0.5   0.5 
                                 
Comprehensive income                 100.9   (0.6)  100.3 
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)                      (0.2)      (0.2)
Dividends on series C cumulative preferred stock ($21.25/share)                      (8.5)      (8.5)
Options exercised and stock subscribed                  8.3           8.3 
Stock plan shares issued from treasury                  2.3           2.3 
Share-based compensation                  1.5           1.5 
Stock issued in acquisition of Grupo KCSM              0.2   304.2           304.4 
Issuance of series D cumulative preferred stock          0.2       201.8           202.0 
Repurchase of $.01 par common stock              (0.1)  (200.3)          (200.4)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2005
  6.1   0.4   0.2   0.7   473.1   946.1   (0.4)  1,426.2 
                                 
Comprehensive income:                                
Net income                      108.9       108.9 
Amortization of interest rate swaps                          0.4   0.4 
                                 
Comprehensive income                 108.9   0.4   109.3 
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)                      (0.2)      (0.2)
Dividends on series C cumulative preferred stock ($5.31/share)                      (2.1)      (2.1)
Dividends on series D cumulative preferred stock ($9.40/share)                      (2.0)      (2.0)
Stock issued for repayment of debt                  35.0           35.0 
Options exercised and stock subscribed                  8.6           8.6 
Tax benefit of share-based compensation                  2.0           2.0 
Share-based compensation                  4.3           4.3 
Adjustment to adopt FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax of $.8 million                          1.3   1.3 
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2006
 $6.1  $0.4  $0.2  $0.7  $523.0  $1,050.7  $1.3  $1,582.4 
                                 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


62


Kansas City Southern

Note 1. Description of the Business

Note 1.  Description of the Business

Kansas City Southern (“KCS” or the “Company”) is, a Delaware corporation, that was initially organized in 1962 as Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. In 2002, the Company formally changed its name to Kansas City Southern. KCS is a holding company with principal operations in rail transportation. KCS’s principal subsidiaries and affiliates,
Until the second quarter of 2005, KCS operated under one reportable business segment in the rail transportation industry. Beginning in the second quarter of 2005, with the acquisition of a controlling interest in Grupo KCSM, KCS began operating under two reportable business segments, which are reported under onedefined geographically as United States (U.S.) and Mexico. In both the U.S. and the Mexico segments, the Company generates revenues and cash flows by providing its customers with freight delivery services both within its regions, and throughout North America through connections with other Class I rail carriers. KCS’ customers conduct business segment,in a number of different industries, including electric-generating utilities, chemical and petroleum products, paper and forest products, agriculture and mineral products, automotive products and intermodal transportation.
KCS’ principal geographic business segments include the following:
U.S. Segment.
• The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary;
• Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”), a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary; which wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”);
• Meridian Speedway, LLC (“MSLLC”), a ninety percent owned consolidated affiliate.
• Combined with equity investments in:
• Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (“Southern Capital”), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate that owns and leases locomotives and other rail equipment;
• Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate which owns all of the common stock of Panarail Tourism Company (“Panarail”).
Mexico Segment.
• Grupo KCSM, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo KCSM”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, formerly known as Grupo Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V., is KCS’ Mexican holding company which owns all but one share of Kansas City Southern de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KCSM”).
• KCSM which is the principal operating subsidiary of Grupo KCSM operates under the rights granted by the Concession acquired from the Mexican government in 1997 (“the Concession”) as described below.
• Arrendadora KCSM, S.A. de C.V. (“Arrendadora”), is wholly-owned by Grupo KCSM and KCSM and has as its only operation, the leasing to KCSM of the locomotives and freight cars acquired through the privatization and subsequently sold to Arrendadora by KCSM.
• Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (“FTVM”), a twenty five percent owned unconsolidated affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary services in the greater Mexico City area.
KCS completed its acquisition of control of Grupo KCSM on April 1, 2005, and Grupo KCSM became a consolidated subsidiary of KCS. On September 12, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries, Grupo KCSM and KCSM, along with the Mexican holding company Grupo TMM, S.A. (“TMM”), entered into a settlement


63


The
Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”),
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

agreement with the Mexican government resolving the controversies and disputes between the companies and the Mexican government concerning the payment of a wholly-owned subsidiary of KCS;

Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo TFM”), a 46.6% owned unconsolidated affiliate of KCSR. Grupo TFM owns 80%VAT refund to KCSM and the purchase of the stockremaining shares of TFM, S.A. de C.V. (“TFM”). TFM wholly-owns Mexrail, Inc. (“Mexrail”). Mexrail wholly-owns KCSM owned by the Mexican government. As a result of this settlement, KCS wholly owns Grupo KCSM and KCSM. Grupo KCSM and KCSM constituted 53% of consolidated assets at December 31, 2006 and 47% of 2006 consolidated revenues.
The Texas-Mexican Railway Company (“Tex-Mex”);

Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (“Southern Capital”),KCSM Concession.  KCSM holds a 50% owned unconsolidated affiliateConcession from the Mexican government until June 2047 (exclusive through 2027, subject to certain trackage rights) which is renewable under certain conditions for additional periods of KCSR that leases locomotive andup to 50 years. The Concession is to provide freight transportation services over rail equipment to KCSR;

Panama Canal Railway Company (“PCRC”), an unconsolidated affiliate oflines which KCSR indirectly owns 50%are a primary commercial corridor of the common stock. PCRC owns all ofMexican railroad system. These lines include the common stock of Panarail Tourism Company (“Panarail”).

KCS, along with its principal subsidiaries and joint ventures, owns and operates ashortest, most direct rail network that links key commercial and industrial markets in the United States and Mexico. The Company also has a strategic alliance with the Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”) and Illinois Central Corporation (“IC”) (collectively “CN/IC”) and other marketing agreements, which provide the ability for the Company to expand its geographic reach.

KCS’s rail network, including its joint ventures, strategic alliances and marketing agreements, connects shippers in the midwestern and eastern regions of the United States, including shippers utilizing Chicago, Illinois and Kansas City, Missouri—the two largest rail centers in the United States—with the largest industrial centers of Canada and Mexico, including Toronto, Edmonton,passageway between Mexico City and Monterrey. KCS’s rail system, through its core network, strategic alliances and marketing agreements, interconnects with all Class I railroads in North America.

KCSR, which owns and operates one of seven Class I railroads (railroads with annual revenues of at least $272.0 million) in the United States, is comprised of approximately 3,100 miles of main and branch lines and approximately 1,250 miles of other tracks in a ten-state region that includes Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Louisiana,Laredo, Texas and Illinois. KCSR, which traces its origins to 1887, offers the shortest north/south rail route between Kansas City and several key ports along the Gulf of Mexico in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. Additionally, KCSR, in conjunction with the Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk Southern”), operates the most direct rail route (referred to as the “Meridian Speedway”), between the Atlanta, Georgia and Dallas, Texas rail gateways, for rail traffic moving between the southeast and southwest regions of the United States. The Meridian Speedway also provides eastern shippers and other U.S. and Canadian railroads with an efficient connection to Mexican markets. KCSR’s rail route also serves the east/west route linking Kansas City with East St. Louis and Springfield, Illinois. Further, KCSR has limited haulage rights between Springfield and Chicago that allow for shipments that originate or terminate on the former Gateway Western’s rail lines. These lines also provide access to East St. Louis and allow rail traffic to avoid the St. Louis, Missouri terminal. KCSR’s geographic reach enables service to a customer base that includes, among others, electric generating utilities, which use coal, and a wide range of companies in the chemical and petroleum, agricultural and mineral, paper and forest, and automotive and intermodal markets.

The Company’s rail network links directly to major trading centers in Mexico through TFM and Tex-Mex. TFM operates a railroad of approximately 2,650 miles of main and branch lines running from the U.S./Mexican border at Laredo, Texas to Mexico City and servesserve most of Mexico’s principal industrial cities and three of its major shipping ports. TFM also ownsKCSM has the right to use, but does not own, all track and buildings that are necessary for the rail lines’ operation. The Company is obligated to maintain the right of Mexrail, whichway, track structure, buildings and related maintenance facilities to the operational standards specified in turn wholly-owns Tex-Mex. Tex-Mex operates approximately 160 milesthe concession agreement and to return the assets in that condition at the end of mainthe Concession period. KCSM is required to pay the Mexican government a concession duty equal to 0.5% of gross revenues during the first 15 years of the concession period and branch lines between Laredo1.25% of such revenues during the remainder of the period.

Under the Concession and Mexican law, the Company may freely set rates unless the Mexican government determines that there is no effective competition in Mexico’s rail industry. KCSM is required to provide railroad services to all users on a fair and non-discriminatory basis and in accordance with efficiency and safety standards approved periodically by the Mexican government. In the event that rates charged are higher than the registered rates, KCSM must reimburse customers with interest, and risk the revocation of the Concession.
Mexican railroad services law and regulations and the port cityConcession establish several circumstances under which the Concession will terminate: revocation by the Mexican government, statutory appropriation, or KCSM’s voluntary surrender of Corpus Christi, Texas. TFM, through its concessionrights or liquidation or bankruptcy. The Concession requires the undertaking of capital projects, including those described in a business plan filed every five years with the Mexican government. KCSM filed its second business plan with the Mexican government hasin 2003 in which KCSM committed to certain minimal investment and capital improvement goals, which may be waived by the Mexican government upon application for relief for good cause. Mexico may also revoke KCSM’s exclusivity after 2017 if it determines that there is insufficient competition.
In the event that the Concession is revoked by the Mexican government, KCSM will receive no compensation. Rail lines and all other fixtures covered by the Concession, as well as all improvements, will revert to the Mexican government. All other property not covered by the Concession, including all locomotives and railcars otherwise acquired, will remain KCSM’s property. The Mexican government will have the right to control and operatecause the southern halfCompany to lease all service-related assets to it for a term of at least one year, automatically renewable for additional one-year terms up to five years. The Mexican government must exercise this right within four months after revocation of the rail-bridge at LaredoConcession. The Mexican government may also temporarily seize the rail lines and indirectly through its ownershipassets used in operating the rail lines in the event of Mexrail, ownsa natural disaster, war, significant public disturbances, or imminent danger to the northern halfdomestic peace or economy for the duration of any of the rail-bridgeforegoing events. Further, Mexican law requires that the Mexican government pay KCSM compensation equal to damages caused and losses suffered if it effects a statutory appropriation for reasons of the public interest. These payments may not be sufficient to compensate the Company for its losses and may not be timely made.
Employees and Labor Relations.  Labor relations in the U.S. railroad industry are subject to extensive governmental regulation under the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”). Under the RLA, national labor agreements are renegotiated when they become open for modification, but their terms remain in effect until new agreements are reached. Typically, neither management nor labor employees are permitted to take economic


64


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

action until extended procedures are exhausted. Various collective bargaining agreements cover approximately 81% of KCSR employees.
Under the negotiating process for new collective bargaining agreements which began on November 1, 1999, all U.S. unions reached new labor agreements with KCSR in 2005. Wages, health and welfare benefits, work rules and other issues have been negotiated on an industry-wide scale. Previously, these negotiations, which can take place over significant periods of time, have not resulted in any extended work interruptions. The existing agreements will remain in effect until new agreements are reached or the RLA’s procedures are exhausted. Until new agreements are reached, the current agreements provide for periodic wage adjustments.
A labor agreement covering approximately 75% of KCSM’s total employees was renewed in 2005 and is effective through July 2007. The compensation terms of the labor agreement are subject to renegotiation on an annual basis and all other terms are renegotiated every two years. These negotiations have not resulted in any strikes, boycotts or other material disruptions at Laredo, which spans the Rio Grande River between the United States and Mexico. Laredo is the principal international gateway where more than 50% of all rail and truck traffic between the United States and Mexico crosses the border.

KCSM.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2.  Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented using the accrual basis of accounting and include the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The equity method of accounting is used for all entities in which the Company or its subsidiaries have significant influence, but not more than 50%fifty percent voting interest; and the cost method of accounting is generally used for investments of less than 20%twenty percent voting interest.

The company evaluates less than majority owned investments for consolidation pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003). The Company currently does not have any less than majority owned investments requiring consolidation.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.  Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in a business combination. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the goodwill balance was $10.6 million which is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are reviewed at least annually for impairment. An impairment loss would be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the assets’ fair value. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective useful lives. The Company performed its annual impairment test for goodwill as of September 30, 2006 and there was no indication that goodwill was impaired.
Use of Estimates.The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform withto accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management reviews its estimates, including those related to the recoverability and useful lives of assets, as well as liabilities for litigation, environmental remediation, casualty claims, and income taxes. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Currency Translation.  For tax purposes, Grupo KCSM and its subsidiaries are required to maintain their books and records in Mexican pesos. For financial reporting purposes, Grupo KCSM and its subsidiaries maintain records in U.S. dollars, which is the functional currency. The dollar is the currency that reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to the entity (i.e., historical cost convention). Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in pesos are translated into dollars using current exchange rates. The difference between the exchange rate on the date of the transaction and the exchange rate


65


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

on the settlement date, or balance sheet date if not settled, is included in the income statement as other income.
Revenue Recognition.  The Company recognizes freight revenue based upon the percentage of completion of a commodity movement.movement as a shipment moves from origin to destination, with the related expense recognized as incurred. Other revenues, in general, are recognized when the product is shipped, as services are performed or contractual obligations fulfilled.

Cash Equivalents.  Short-term liquid investments with an initial maturity of generally three months or less are consideredclassified as cash equivalents.

Inventories. Materials

Accounts Receivable, net.  Accounts receivable are net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts as determined by historical experience and supplies inventoriesadjusted for economic uncertainties or known trends. Accounts are charged to the allowance when a customer enters bankruptcy, when an account has been transferred to a collection agent or submitted for legal action, or when a customer is significantly past due and all available means of collection have been exhausted. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $31.4 million and $24.1 million, respectively. Bad debt expense was $10.8 million and $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Restricted Funds —JSIB Consulting.  In connection with KCS’ acquisition of the controlling interest in Grupo KCSM, KCS entered into a consulting agreement with José F. Serrano International Business, S.A. de C.V. (“JSIB”), a consulting company controlled by Jose Serrano, Chairman of the Board of TMM, which became effective April 1, 2005. Under this agreement, JSIB will provide consulting services to KCS in connection with its Mexico business for a period of three years. As consideration for these services, JSIB receives an annual fee of $3.0 million. The consulting agreement required KCS to deposit the total amount of annual fees payable under the agreement ($9.0 million) in cash to be held and released in accordance with the consulting agreement. On January 12, 2006, the first $3.0 million annual fee was released from the escrow account. Accordingly the balance in restricted funds was $6.0 million on December 31, 2006, of which $3.0 million was included in current assets and $3.0 million was included in other assets. JSIB directs the investment of the escrow fund and all gains and losses in the fund accrue to JSIB’s benefit.
Restricted Funds — MSLLC.  On December 1, 2005, KCS and KCSR entered into a transaction agreement with Norfolk Southern Corporation (“NS”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company (“AGS”), providing for the formation of a limited liability company between the parties relating to the ownership and improvement of the KCSR rail line between Meridian, Mississippi and Shreveport, Louisiana, which is the portion of the KCSR rail line between Dallas, Texas and Meridian known as the “Meridian Speedway”.
In connection with the formation of MSLLC, NS, through AGS, contributed $100.0 million to MSLLC, representing the initial NS investment in the joint venture. MSLLC commenced operations on May 1, 2006. NS’ initial investment, $76.5 million was distributed to KCS as reimbursement for capital expenditures incurred and paid by KCS for MSLLC during 2006. KCS has classified the remaining balance of $23.5 million, as funds restricted for payment of MSLLC capital assets at December 31, 2006. Substantially all of these funds will be used for capital improvements on the Meridian Speedway. NS has a binding commitment to fund additional cash contributions of $200 million, subject to the terms of the agreement, reflecting an ultimate ownership of 30% in MSLLC, once funded.
Inventories.  Inventories consisting of diesel fuel, items to be used in the maintenance of rolling stock and items to be used in the maintenance or construction of road property, are valued at the lower of average cost or market.
Derivative Instruments.  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, requires that derivatives be recorded on the balance


66


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded either through current earnings or as other comprehensive income, depending on hedge designation. Gains and losses on derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income and are reclassified into earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash flow of the hedged item. The ineffective portion of all hedge transactions is recognized in current period earnings.
Properties and Depreciation.  Properties are stated at cost.cost less accumulated depreciation. Additions and renewals, including those on leased assets that increase the life or utility of the asset, are capitalized and all properties are depreciated over the estimated remaining life or lease term of such assets, whichever is shorter. The Company capitalizes certain overhead costs representing the indirect costs associated with construction and improvement projects using the full absorption method. Overhead factors are periodically reviewed and adjusted to reflect current costs. Depreciation for railway operating assets is derived using the group-life method. This method classifies similar assets by equipment or road type and depreciates these assets as a whole. OrdinaryRepairs and maintenance and repairscosts are charged to expense as incurred.

The ranges of annual depreciation rates for financial statement purposes are: road and structures — 1% to 4%, rolling stock and equipment — 2% to 14%, computer software — 8% to 14%, and capitalized leases — 3% to 7%.
The cost of transportation equipment and road property normally retired, less salvage value, is charged to accumulated depreciation. The cost of industrial and other property retired, and the cost of transportation property abnormally retired, together with accumulated depreciation thereon, areis eliminated from the property accounts and the related gains or losses are reflected in net income. Gains recognized on the sale or disposal of operating properties that were reflected in operating income were $5.9 million, $3.1 million and $5.8 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Gains or losses recognized on the sale of non-operating properties reflected in

other income were $0.3 million and $7.4 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Gains or losses recognized on the sale of non-operating propertiesproperty reflected in other income wereare not significantmaterial for the periods presented.

KCSR Depreciation Review.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, KCSR engaged a civil engineering firm with expertise in 2001.

Depreciation is computed using group straight-line rates for financial statement purposes. The Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) approves the depreciation rates used by KCSR. KCSR periodically evaluatesrailway property usage to conduct a study to evaluate depreciation rates for properties and equipmentequipment. The study centered on evaluating actual historical replacement patterns to assess future lives and implements approvedindicated that KCSR was depreciating its property over shorter periods than the assets were actually used, as estimated by the study. The effect of this change in estimate was a $3.0 million decrease in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006.

KCSM Depreciation Review.  For the year ended December 31, 2005, KCSM adopted the group depreciation method for consistency with KCSR. Accordingly, changes were made to certain historical depreciation rates. DepreciationDuring the year ended December 31, 2005, KCSM engaged a civil engineering firm with expertise in railway property usage to conduct an analysis of depreciation rates for other consolidated subsidiaries is computed basedproperties and equipment. The analysis centered on evaluating actual historical replacement patterns to assess future lives and indicated that KCSM was depreciating its property over shorter periods than actually utilized. As a result, depreciation expense recorded in the asset valuefourth quarter of 2005 reflected an adjustment totaling $5.5 million to reduce depreciation expense recorded in excessthe second and third quarters of estimated salvage value using2005. Concession rights and related assets are amortized over the straight-line methodshorter of their remaining useful lives as determined by the KCSM depreciation review or the life of the Concession.
Concession Rights and Related Assets.  Costs incurred by the Company to acquire the Concession rights and related assets were capitalized and are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets.related assets and rights acquired. Concession replacements and improvements are stated at cost. Major repairs and track rehabilitation are capitalized. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the respective improvements, or the term of the Concession if shorter.
Computer Software Costs.  Costs incurred in conjunction with the purchase or development of computer software for internal use are capitalized. Costs incurred in the preliminary project stage, as well as training and maintenance costs, are expensed as incurred. Direct and indirect costs associated with the application


67

Accelerated depreciation


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

development stage of internal use software are capitalized until such time that the software is usedsubstantially complete and ready for income tax purposes. The weighted-average annual depreciation rates for financial statement purposes are:

Road and structures

3%

Rolling stock and equipment

3%

Other equipment

2%

Computer software

9%

Capitalized leases

6%

Long-lived assets.its intended use. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software.

Long-Lived Assets.The Company evaluates the recoverability of its operating properties when there is an indication that an asset value has been impaired. The measurement of possible impairment is based primarily on the ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from expected future operating cash flows related to the assets on an undiscounted basis.

Casualty Claims.Casualty claims in excess of self-insurance levels are insured up to certain coverage amounts, depending on the type of claim. The Company’s casualty liability reserve is based on a study by There were no assets requiring an independent third party actuarial firm performed on an undiscounted basis. The reserve is based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. While the ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on various factors, it is management’s opinion that the recorded liability is a reasonable estimate of aggregate future claims. Adjustments to the liability will be reflected as operating expenses in the period in which the adjustments are known. For other occupational injury claims, an assessment is made on a case-by-case basis and a liability is established when management determines that it is probable and reasonably estimable.

Computer Software Costs.Costs incurred in conjunction with the purchase or development of computer software for internal use are capitalized. Costs incurred in the preliminary project stage, as well as training and maintenance costs, are expensed as incurred. Direct and indirect costs associated with the application development stage of internal use software are capitalized until such time that the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software. As ofimpairment adjustment at December 31, 2003 and 2002, a total of approximately $59.7 million and $58.0 million, respectively, was capitalized (including a total of approximately $5.9 million of capitalized interest costs for each of 2003 and 2002, respectively) for the transportation operating system, management control system (“MCS”), which was implemented in July, 2002.

Goodwill and other intangible assets. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 provides, among other things, that goodwill with an indefinite life shall no longer be amortized, but shall be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis. The transitional disclosures are presented in the table below. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company’s goodwill decreased primarily due to the sale of Mexrail to TFM.

   Year Ended December 31,

   2003

  2002

  2001

Reported net income

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7

Add back: Goodwill amortization

   —     —     0.6
   

  

  

Adjusted net income

  $12.2  $57.2  $31.3
   

  

  

Reported diluted earnings per share—net income

  $0.10  $0.91  $0.50

Add back: Goodwill amortization

   —     —     0.01
   

  

  

Adjusted diluted earnings per share—net income

  $0.10  $0.91  $0.51
   

  

  

2006.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments.  The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, lease and contract receivables, accounts payable and long-term debt.

debt as described in Note 6.

The financial statement carrying value of the Company’s cash equivalents approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. Carrying value approximates fair value for all financial instruments with six months or less to re-pricing or maturity and for financial instruments with variable interest rates. The Company estimates the fair value of long-term debt based upon borrowing rates available at the reporting date for indebtedness with similar terms and average maturities. Based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company and its subsidiaries for indebtedness with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of long-term debt was approximately $558$1,814.1 million and $617$1,938.6 million at December 31, 20032006 and 2002,2005, respectively. The financial statement carrying value was $523$1,757.0 million and $583$1,860.6 million at December 31, 20032006 and 2002,2005, respectively.
Environmental Liabilities.  The Company records liabilities for remediation and restoration costs related to past activities when the Company’s obligation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable. Costs of ongoing compliance activities related to current operations are expensed as incurred.
Casualty Claims.  Casualty claims in excess of self-insurance levels are insured up to certain coverage amounts, depending on the type of claim and year of occurrence. The Company’s casualty liability reserve is based on a study by an independent third party actuarial firm performed on an undiscounted basis. The reserve is based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. While the ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on various factors, it is management’s opinion that the recorded liability is a reasonable estimate of aggregate future claims. Adjustments to the liability will be reflected as operating expenses in the period in which the adjustments are known. Legal fees related to casualty claims are recorded in operating expense in the period incurred.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits.  The Company provides certain medical, life and other postretirement benefits to certain active employees and retirees. The Company uses third party actuaries to assist in estimating liabilities and expenses for pension and other post retirement benefits. Estimate amounts are based on current and historical information, current information and estimates regarding future events and circumstances. Significant assumptions used in the valuation of pension and other postretirement liabilities include the expected return on plan assets (if funded), discount rate, rate of increase in compensation levels and the health care cost trend rate.
KCSM Employees’ Statutory Profit Sharing.  KCSM is subject to employee statutory profit sharing requirements under Mexican law and calculates profit sharing liability as 10% of KCSM net taxable income, adjusted as prescribed by the Mexican income tax law. In calculating its net taxable income for statutory profit sharing purposes, KCSM previously deducted NOL carryforwards. The application of NOL carryforwards can result in a deferred profit sharing asset for a given period rather than a profit sharing liability. Due to decisions by the Mexican Supreme Court in 2005 declaring that NOLs from previous years may not be deducted, KCSM


68


Kansas City Southern
Derivative Instruments.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

changed the method of calculating its statutory profit sharing liability. KCSM no longer deducts NOLs from prior years when calculating employee statutory profit sharing. This change required KCSM to write off its deferred tax assets related to statutory profit sharing resulting in a charge to operating expenses of $35.6 million in 2005, after purchase accounting adjustments.
Share-Based Compensation.  Effective January 1, 2006, the Company accounts for all share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,123R (Revised) “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”). Under this method, compensation expense is measured at grant date based on the then fair value of the award and is recognized over the requisite service period in which the award is earned. The Company has elected to adopt SFAS 123R on a modified prospective basis, which requires that all new awards and modified awards after the effective date and any unvested awards at the effective date are recognized as compensation cost ratably over the option vesting period. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of the grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods should actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for prior years have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123R.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accounted for share-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Derivative InstrumentsStock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and Hedging Activities”followed the pro forma disclosure requirements set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 133”123”), as amended, requires that derivatives be recorded. Under this method, compensation expense was recognized ratably over the option vesting period if an option exercise price was less than the market price of the stock at the date of grant. KCS’ practice was to set the option exercise price equal to the market price of the stock at the date of grant; therefore, no compensation expense was recognized for financial reporting purposes.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes inCompany had applied the fair value of derivatives are recorded either through current earnings or as other comprehensive income, depending on the type of hedge transaction. Gains and losses on the derivative instrument reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash flow of the hedged item. The ineffective portion of all hedge transactions is recognized in current period earnings.

KCS adopted therecognition provisions of SFAS 133, as amended, effective123 to share-based employee compensation prior to January 1, 2001. As a result2006:

         
  2005  2004 
 
Net income (in millions):
        
As reported $100.9  $24.4 
Additional stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method, net of income taxes  (0.8)  (1.6)
         
Pro forma $100.1  $22.8 
         
Earnings per basic share:
        
As reported $1.21  $0.25 
Pro forma  1.20   0.22 
Earnings per diluted share:
        
As reported $1.10  $0.25 
Pro forma  1.07   0.22 
All shares held in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are treated as outstanding for purposes of computing the Company’s earnings per share. See additional information in Note 9.
The Company issues treasury stock to settle share-based awards. The Company does not intend to repurchase any shares in 2007 to provide shares to issue as share-based awards; however, management continually evaluates the appropriateness of the change in the methodlevel of accounting for derivative instruments, the Company recorded an after-tax chargeshares outstanding.


69


Kansas City Southern
Notes to earnings of $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2001. This charge is presented as a cumulative effect of an accounting change in the accompanying financial statements and represents the ineffective portion of certain interest rate cap agreements. In 2002, these interest rate cap agreements expired with no significant effect on earnings.

Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Income Taxes.  Deferred income tax effects of transactions reported in different periods for financial reporting and income tax return purposes are recorded under the liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method gives consideration to the future tax consequences of the deferred income tax items and immediately recognizes changes in income tax laws upon enactment.

Prior to the acquisition of a controlling interest in Grupo TFM providesKCSM on April 1, 2005, Grupo KCSM provided deferred income taxes for the difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases of its assets and liabilities. The Company recordsKCS recorded its proportionate share of these income taxes through its equity in Grupo TFM’sKCSM’s earnings. AsSince April 1, 2005, Grupo KCSM income taxes are reflected in the consolidated results. Although KCSM has generated book profits, it has incurred tax losses due primarily to the accelerated tax amortization of December 31, 2003,the concession rights. The Company has recognized a deferred income tax asset for the resulting net operating loss carryforwards. Management anticipates that such net operating loss carryforwards will be realized given the long carryforward period (through the year 2046) for amortization of the Concession, as well as the fact that KCSM expects to generate taxable income in the future. The Company’s tax projections take into consideration certain assumptions, some of which are under its control and others which are not. Key assumptions include inflation rates, currency fluctuations and future revenue growth. If the assumptions are not correct, a valuation allowance would have to be recognized on the deferred tax asset.
Prior to the acquisition of a controlling interest in Grupo KCSM on April 1, 2005, the Company haddid not provided deferredprovide U.S. federal income taxes for the temporary difference between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of its investment in Grupo TFMKCSM because Grupo TFM isKCSM was a foreign corporate joint venture that iswas considered permanent in duration, and the Company doesdid not expect the reversal of the temporary difference to occur in the foreseeable future.

Changes Following the acquisition of Interestcontrol of Grupo KCSM in Subsidiaries and Equity Investees.A change2005, the Company has not provided U.S. federal income taxes on the undistributed earnings of Grupo KCSM since the Company intends to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the Company’s interest in a subsidiary or equity investee resulting from the sale of the subsidiary’s or equity investee’s stock is generally recorded as a gain or loss in the Company’s net income in the period that the change of interest occurs. If an

issuance of stock by the subsidiary or affiliate is from treasury shares on which gains have been previously recognized, however, KCS will record the gain directly to its equity and not include the gain in net income. A change of interest in a subsidiary or equity investee resulting from a subsidiary’s or equity investee’s purchase of its stock increases the Company’s ownership percentage of the subsidiary or equity investee. The Company records this type of transaction under the purchase method of accounting, whereby any excess of fair market value over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets is recorded as goodwill.

Treasury Stock.The excess of par over cost of the preferred shares held in Treasury is credited to paid in capital. Common shares held in Treasury are accounted for as if they were retired and the excess of cost over par value of such shares is charged to paid in capital.

Stock Plans. Proceeds received from the exercise of stock options or subscriptions are credited to the appropriate stockholders’ equity accounts in the year exercised.

Pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), compensation expense is recognized ratably over the option vesting period to the extent that an option exercise price is less than the market price of the stock at the date of grant. Because KCS’s practice is to set the option exercise price equal to the market price of the stock at date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized for financial reporting purposes.

The FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) in October 1995. This statement allows companies to continue under the approach set forth in APB 25 for recognizing stock-based compensation expense in the financial statements, but encourages companies to adopt the fair value method of accounting for employee stock options. Under SFAS 123, companies must either record compensation expense based on the estimated grant date fair value of stock options granted or disclose the impact on net income as if they had adopted the fair value method (for grants subsequent to December 31, 1994). If KCS had measured compensation cost for the KCS stock options granted to its employees and shares subscribed by its employees under the KCS employee stock purchase plan, under the fair value based method prescribed by SFAS 123, net income andUnited States.

Earnings Per Share.  Basic earnings per share would have been as follows:

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Net income(in millions):

             

As reported

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7 

Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method, net of income taxes

   (1.8)  (1.7)  (4.0)
   


 


 


Pro forma

   10.4   55.5   26.7 

Earnings per Basic share:

             

As reported

  $0.10  $0.94  $0.52 

Pro forma

   0.07   0.92   0.45 

Earnings per Diluted share:

             

As reported

  $0.10  $0.91  $0.50 

Pro forma

   0.07   0.88   0.43 

All shares held in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are treated as outstanding for purposes of computing the Company’s earnings per share. See additional information on the ESOP in Note 8.

Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings percommon share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflectsreflect the potential dilution that could occur if convertible securities and stock options were converted into common stock or exercised.stock based awards were exercised or earned. The following is a reconciliation fromreconciles the weighted average shares used for the basic earnings per share computation to the shares used for the diluted earnings per share computation for the three years endedat December 31 2003 (in(in thousands):.

             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Basic shares  74,593   75,527   62,715 
Additional weighted average shares attributable to convertible securities and stock options:            
$9.0 million VAT/Put settlement payment due to JSIB     110    
$47.0 million escrow note  1,667   1,439    
VAT/Put settlement contingency payment  1,418   918    
Convertible preferred stock  13,389   13,389    
Stock options  1,266   1,358   1,268 
Nonvested shares  53   6    
             
Diluted shares  92,386   92,747   63,983 
             


70

   2003

  2002

  2001

Basic shares

  61,725  60,336  58,598

Dilutive effect of stock options

  —    1,982  2,386

Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock

  —    —    —  
   
  
  

Diluted shares

  61,725  62,318  60,984
   
  
  

Shares excluded from diluted computation

  261  321  97
   
  
  

For the year ended December 31, 2003, 8,926,080 potential


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Potentially dilutive shares related to the $1 par, 4.25% Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (“Convertible Preferred Stock”) and 1,356,879 potential dilutive shares related to stock options were excluded from the computationcalculation(in thousands):
             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Stock options where the exercise price is greater than the average market price of common shares     1   361 
Convertible preferred stock series C which are anti-dilutive        13,389 
Convertible preferred stock series D which are anti-dilutive  7,000   486    
The following reconciles net income available to common shareholders for purposes of basic earnings per share to that for purposes of diluted earnings per share because the inclusion of these shares would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, 261,093, 320,687 and 97,357 shares, respectively, related to stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

The only adjustment that currently affects the numerator of the Company’s diluted earnings per share computation is preferred dividends. During 2003, preferred dividends of $5.9 million were deducted from net income to calculate basic earnings per share. Additionally, because the potentially dilutive shares relating to the Convertible Preferred Stock were anti-dilutive, these convertible preferred dividends ($5.7 million earned during 2003) were also deducted from net income to calculate diluted earnings per share. Preferred dividends deducted from net income (in each of 2002 and 2001 were $0.2 million related to the $25 par, 4% noncumulative preferred stock.

millions):

             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Net income available to common shareholders for purposes of computing basic earnings per share $89.4  $91.4  $15.7 
Effect of dividends on conversion of convertible preferred stock  8.5   8.5    
Effect of interest expense on conversion of $47.0 million escrow note  1.4   1.1    
Effect of interest expense on conversion of note payable to TMM for VAT/Put settlement  0.8   0.6    
             
Net income available to common shareholders for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share $100.1  $101.6  $15.7 
             
Postretirement benefits.The Company provides certain medical, life and other postretirement benefits to certain retirees. The costs of such benefits are expensed over the estimated period of employment.

Environmental liabilities.The Company records liabilities for remediation and restoration costs related to past activities when the Company’s obligation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of ongoing compliance activities related to current operations are expensed as incurred.

New Accounting Pronouncements.

SFAS 143FIN 48.

KCS adopted Statement of  In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”). Under SFAS 143, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation must be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. KCSR, along with other Class I railroads, depreciates track structure (rail, ties, and other track material) in accordance with regulations promulgated by the STB. These regulations require KCSR to depreciate track structure to a net salvage value (gross estimated salvage value less estimated costs to remove the track structure at the end of its useful life). For certain track structure such as ties, with little or no gross salvage value, this practice ultimately results in depreciating an asset below a value of zero, and thus, in effect, results in recording a liability. Under the requirements of SFAS 143, in the absence of a legal obligation to remove the track structure, such accounting

practice is prohibited. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 143 in the first quarter of 2003, and, as a result, reviewed its depreciation of track structures to determine instances where the depreciation of removal costs has resulted or would be expected (based on the current depreciation rate) to result in the depreciation of an asset below zero when considering net salvage value. As a result of this review, the Company estimated the excess depreciation recorded on such assets and recorded this amount as a reduction in accumulated depreciation of $14.5 million and as a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $8.9 million (net of taxes of $5.6 million) as required by SFAS 143 in the first quarter of 2003. Additionally, depreciation rates applied to certain track structure elements that were previously yielding a negative salvage value have been modified to comply with the provisions of SFAS 143. For the year ended December 31, 2003, this resulted in a reduction in depreciation expense of approximately $1.4 million.

A summary of the pro forma net income and earnings per share had SFAS 143 been applied retroactively is as follows:

   2003

  2002

  2001

Net income(in millions)

            

As reported

  $12.2  $57.2  $30.7

Pro forma

  $3.3  $58.6  $32.0

Earnings per Basic share:

            

As reported

  $0.10  $0.94  $0.52

Pro forma

  $(0.04) $0.97  $0.54

Earnings per Diluted share:

            

As reported

  $0.10  $0.91  $0.50

Pro forma

  $(0.04) $0.94  $0.52

FIN 45

In November 2002, the FASBStandards Board issued Interpretation 48Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 45, “Guarantor’s109, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“Income Taxes(“FIN 45”48”). FIN 45 provides guidance on,which clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and disclosure requirements relating to the issuance of certain types of guarantees and requires the guarantor to recognize at the inception of a guarantee a liabilitymeasurement attribute for the fair value of the potential obligation. The provisions for the initialfinancial statement recognition and measurement of guaranteesa tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation requires that the Company recognize in the financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure.

The provisions of FIN 48 are effective prospectively for all guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. See Note 3 and Note 9 for disclosuresbeginning January 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of guarantees.

FIN 46 (revised)

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidationchange in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The estimated impact of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”). FIN 46R, clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements” to certain variable interest entities by providing guidance on how a business entity should evaluate whether it has controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and how the entity should be consolidated. FIN 46R replaces Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which was issued in January 2003. The Company adopted FIN 46R effective for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company performed an assessment of its equity method investments in Southern Capital and PCRC for any potential impact this interpretation may have on its accounting for these entities as equity investments. The adoption of FIN 46R had no48 is subject to change due to potential changes in interpretation of FIN 48 by the FASB and other regulatory bodies. The Company is still monitoring this standard and evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48; however, does not anticipate adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s accountingconsolidated Financial Statements.

EITF06-3.  In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ratified Emerging Issues Task Force IssueNo. 06-3 “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus Net Presentation).” This standard allows companies to present in their statements of operations any taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on revenue-producing transactions between a seller and a customer, such as sales, use, value-added and some excise taxes, on either a gross (included in revenues and costs) or a net (excluded from revenues) basis. This standard will be effective for the Company in interim periods and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company presents these transactions on a net basis and intends to continue this presentation in the future, therefore the adoption of this standard will have no impact on its investment infinancial statements.
SFAS 158.  In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement


71


Kansas City Southern Capital or PCRC since, at inception, these entities had sufficient funding
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Plans — an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and capital.

Significant Customer.Southwestern Electric Power Company132(R)” (“SWEPCO”SFAS 158”), which required the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of a subsidiary of American Electric Power, Inc., isdefined benefit postretirement plan in the Company’s only customer that accounted for more than 10% of revenues during the years endedbalance sheet on December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Revenues related2006. Additionally, the pronouncement eliminates the option for the Company to SWEPCO during these periods were $64.7 million and $75.9 million, respectively. During 2003, revenues relateduse a measurement date prior to SWEPCO were $57.2 million, representing approximately 9.8% of the Company’s revenues.

fiscal year end effective December 31, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS 158 effective December 31, 2006, which did not result in a significant impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 3. Investments

Note 3.  

Investments
Investments, including investments in unconsolidated affiliates, are as followsfollow(in millions):
             
  Percentage
       
  Ownership at
  Carrying Value 
Company
 December 31, 2006  2006  2005 
 
Southern Capital  50% $29.2  $27.9 
PCRC  50%  18.3   18.1 
FTVM  25%  13.9   10.9 
Other      3.5   3.4 
             
Total     $64.9  $60.3 
             
Southern Capital.

Company Name


  Percentage
Ownership as of
December 31, 2003


  Carrying Value

   2003

  2002

Grupo TFM

  46.6% $392.1  $380.1

Southern Capital

  50%  28.0   24.9

PCRC

  50%(a)  4.5   7.5

Other

      18.1   10.6
      

  

      $442.7  $423.1
      

  


(a)The Company owns 50% of the outstanding voting common stock of PCRC.

GRUPO TFM

In June 1996, the Company and Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM”—now Grupo TMM ) formed Grupo TFM to participate in the privatization of the Mexican railroad system. In December 1996, the Mexican government awarded Grupo TFM the right to acquire an 80% interest (representing 100% of the shares with unrestricted voting rights) in TFM for approximately 11.072 billion Mexican pesos (approximately $1.4 billion based on the U.S. dollar/Mexican peso exchange rate on the award date). TFM holds a 50-year concession (with the option of a 50-year extension subject to certain conditions) to operate approximately 2,650 miles of track that directly links Mexico City and Monterrey (as well as Guadalajara through trackage rights) with the ports of Lazaro Cardenas, Veracruz and Tampico and the Mexican/United States border crossings of Nuevo Laredo-Laredo, Texas and Matamoros-Brownsville, Texas. TFM’s route network provides a connection to the major industrial and population areas of Mexico from the United States. TFM interchanges traffic with Tex-Mex and the Union Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”) at Laredo, Texas.

The Company and Grupo TMM exercised their call option and, on July 29, 2002, completed the purchase of the Mexican government’s 24.6% ownership of Grupo TFM. The Mexican government’s ownership interest of Grupo TFM was purchased by TFM for a purchase price of $256.1 million, utilizing a combination of proceeds from an offering by TFM of debt securities, a credit from the Mexican government for the reversion of certain rail facilities and other resources. This transaction resulted in an increase in the Company’s ownership percentage of Grupo TFM from 36.9% to approximately 46.6%. The purchase price was calculated by accreting the Mexican government’s initial investment of approximately $199 million from the date of the Mexican government’s investment through the date of the purchase, using the interest rate on one-year U.S. Treasury securities.

At December 31, 2003, the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM was approximately $392.1 million. The Company’s interest in Grupo TFM is approximately 46.6%, with Grupo TMM owning approximately 48.5% and the remaining 4.9% is owned indirectly by the Mexican government through its 20% ownership of TFM. The Company has a management services agreement with Grupo TFM to provide certain consulting and management services. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, $1.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, is reflected as an account receivable in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet related to this management service agreement. Total management fees billed to Grupo TFM were $1.3 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company accounts for its investment in Grupo TFM under the equity method. Additionally, the Company has an account receivable of $4.9 million and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, from Tex-Mex related to certain materials and services provided in the normal course of operations. Total amounts billed to Tex-Mex were $4.7 million, $1.9 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company is party to certain agreements with Grupo TMM covering Grupo TFM, which contains “change of control” provisions, provisions intended to preserve the Company’s and Grupo TMM’s proportionate ownership of the venture, and super majority provisions with respect to voting on certain significant transactions. Such agreements also provide a right of first refusal in the event that either party initiates a divestiture of its equity interest in Grupo TFM. Under certain circumstances, such agreements could affect the Company’s ownership percentage and rights in these equity affiliates.

The May 1997 shareholders agreement between KCS and Grupo TMM and certain affiliates (1) restricted each of the parties to the shareholders agreement from directly or indirectly transferring any interest in Grupo TFM or TFM to a competitor of Grupo TFM or TFM without the prior written consent of each of the parties, and (2) provided that KCS and Grupo TMM may not transfer control of any subsidiary holding all or any portion of shares of Grupo TFM to a third party, other than an affiliate of the transferring party or another party to the shareholders agreement, without the consent of the other parties to the shareholders agreement. The shareholders agreement required that the boards of directors of Grupo TFM and TFM be constituted to reflect the parties’ relative ownership of the ordinary voting common stock of Grupo TFM.

Proposed Acquisition of Grupo TFM from Grupo TMM.On April 20, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Grupo TMM and other parties (the “Acquisition Agreement”), under which KCS ultimately would acquire control of TFM through the purchase of shares of common stock of Grupo TFM (the “Acquisition”). Grupo TFM holds an 80% economic interest in TFM and all of the shares of stock with full voting rights of TFM. The remaining 20% economic interest in TFM is owned by the Mexican government in the form of shares with limited voting rights. KCS currently owns a 46.6% economic interest in Grupo TFM and 49.0% of the shares of common stock of Grupo TFM entitled to full voting rights. The Acquisition Agreement and other related agreements were designed to, following KCS shareholder approval and regulatory approval, place KCSR, Tex-Mex, Gateway Eastern Railway Company (“Gateway Eastern”) and TFM, under the common control of a single transportation holding company, NAFTA Rail, to be headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. As part of the Acquisition, subject to KCS shareholder approval, KCS is expected to change its name to NAFTA Rail. See “Dispute over Acquisition Agreement” below.

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Acquisition Agreement, TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of Grupo TMM, would receive 18 million shares of Class A Convertible Common Stock of the Company, representing, at the time of the Acquisition Agreement, approximately 22% (20% voting, 2% subject to voting restrictions) of the Company, $200 million in cash (with the option to pay up to $80 million of the $200 million cash component due at closing to Grupo TMM with up to 6.4 million additional shares of Company stock) and a potential incentive payment of between $100 million and $180 million based on the resolution of certain future contingencies related to the value added tax lawsuit and the purchase of the Mexican government’s interest in TFM. See “Value Added Tax (“VAT”) Lawsuit and VAT Contingency Payment under the Acquisition Agreement” below.

In connection with the Acquisition, KCS would enter into a consulting agreement with a consulting company organized by Jose Serrano, Chairman of the Board of Grupo TMM, Grupo TFM and TFM, pursuant to which it would provide consulting services to KCS in connection with the portion of the business of KCS in Mexico for a period of three years. As consideration for these services, the consulting company would receive an annual fee of $600,000 per year and a grant of 2,100,000 shares of restricted stock of KCS. The restricted stock would vest over a period of time subject to certain conditions. The consulting agreement may be extended for an additional year at the option of KCS, upon delivery of an additional 525,000 shares of common stock. The consulting agreement also provides for up to an additional 1,350,000 common shares to be issued contingent upon the achievement of certain objectives. The restricted stock issued and the cash fee would likely be accounted for as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements of KCS.

The common control of KCSR and Tex-Mex under NAFTA Rail requires approval of the United States Department of Justice (“Department of Justice”) and the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) in the

United States. Additionally, the acquisition of Grupo TFM shares by NAFTA Rail requires the approval of Mexico’s Competition Commission and the Mexican National Foreign Investments Commission in Mexico.

KCS’s solicitation for permission as a foreign investor to control TFM, through Grupo TFM, was filed with the Mexican National Foreign Investments Commission on April 25, 2003. On August 27, 2003, KCS announced that it received notice from the Mexican National Foreign Investments Commission of that Commission’s decision to close the proceeding with respect to KCS’s application to acquire control of Grupo TFM and, through Grupo TFM, of TFM, without prejudice to refile in the event the dispute is resolved between KCS and Grupo TMM over whether the Acquisition Agreement remains in effect.

KCS’s Notification with respect to the acquisition of the Grupo TFM shares was filed with the Mexican Competition Commission on April 21, 2003. KCS has received formal written notice that the Mexican Competition Commission has approved the proposed consolidation, without conditions. On September 26, 2003, KCS announced this approval was extended for an additional 180 days. As a procedural matter, the Executive Secretary of the Mexican Competition Commission declined to provide an additional extension, consistent with past practice. KCS intends to seek renewed authority at the appropriate time.

On August 1, 2003, the Company announced that the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR”) for the proposed Acquisition had expired without a formal request from the Department of Justice for additional information of documentary material, allowing KCS and Grupo TMM to consummate the transaction without any further delays that could have resulted from requests for additional information by the Department of Justice under U.S. antitrust laws. Under the HSR process, the Department of Justice had thirty days after notice was filed to issue a “second request” asking for various documents and information from the HSR parties. The waiting period officially expired on July 31, 2003, without action by the Department of Justice.

As of December 31, 2003, costs of approximately $9.3 million related to the Acquisition have been deferred and are reported as “other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

KCS and Grupo TMM are in dispute over Grupo TMM’s attempt to terminate the Acquisition Agreement as discussed below.

Dispute over Acquisition Agreement. On August 18, 2003, Grupo TMM shareholders voted not to approve the sale of Grupo TMM’s interests in Grupo TFM to KCS. On August 23, 2003, Grupo TMM sent a notice to KCS claiming to terminate the Acquisition Agreement because the Grupo TMM shareholders had failed to approve the Acquisition Agreement.

On August 29, 2003, KCS delivered to Grupo TMM a formal Notice of Dispute, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement. This initiated an informal 60-day negotiation period between the parties. The parties were unable to resolve the dispute within that period of time. On August 29, 2003, KCS filed a complaint in the Delaware Chancery Court alleging that Grupo TMM had breached the Acquisition Agreement and seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Grupo TMM not to take any action in violation of the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. KCS’s position has been and remains that the Acquisition Agreement does not provide that a negative shareholder vote by Grupo TMM shareholders is a basis for termination. KCS maintains that the Acquisition Agreement is still valid and remains in effect until at least December 31, 2004 (unless otherwise validly terminated in accordance with its terms).

On September 2, 2003, the Company filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery a motion for a preliminary injunction to preserve the parties’ positions while KCS seeks to resolve its dispute over Grupo TMM’s attempt to terminate the Acquisition Agreement. On October 28, 2003, Chancellor William B. Chandler III of the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a written order granting KCS’s motion seeking a preliminary injunction to preserve the parties’ positions pending resolution of KCS’s dispute with Grupo TMM.

On October 31, 2003, KCS initiated binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Acquisition Agreement by serving an Arbitration Demand on Grupo TMM and the American Arbitration Association. In its Arbitration Demand, KCS seeks a determination that the Acquisition Agreement is in full force and effect, specific performance of the Acquisition Agreement, and damages for Grupo TMM’s breach of the terms of the Acquisition Agreement and failure to negotiate in good faith during the 60-day negotiation period. By the agreement of the parties, the arbitration has been bifurcated. The first stage of the arbitration only addressed the question of whether Grupo TMM’s purported negative shareholder vote gave Grupo TMM the right to terminate the Acquisition Agreement. On March 22, 2004, the Company announced that the panel of the American Arbitration Association International Center for Dispute Resolution hearing the dispute between the Company and Grupo TMM issued its interim award on March 19, 2004 finding that the Acquisition Agreement remains in force and is binding on KCS and Grupo TMM in accordance with its terms. The arbitration panel concluded that the rejection of the Acquisition Agreement by Grupo TMM’s shareholders did not authorize Grupo TMM’s purported termination of the Acquisition Agreement. The Company and Grupo TMM will now move on to the second phase of the arbitration, which will decide the remaining issues, including remedies and damages.

On January 6, 2004, KCS announced that in a ruling by the Delaware Court of Chancery regarding a motion to enforce injunction and hold Grupo TMM in contempt in the dispute between KCS and Grupo TMM over the Acquisition Agreement, the court held Grupo TMM in contempt of court for taking actions inconsistent with the court’s October 28, 2003 order discussed above. The court held that by Grupo TMM causing its subsidiary Grupo TFM to revoke powers of attorney requiring the signature of a KCS representative for transactions in excess of $2.5 million and in granting new powers of attorney to Grupo TMM directors, Jose Serrano and Mario Mohar to act on behalf of the company, Grupo TMM violated provisions of the Acquisition Agreement. The previous order of the court required Grupo TMM to cause Grupo TFM to conduct its business in accordance with past practices and not to directly or indirectly amend its organizational documents. The court ordered Grupo TMM to take the actions necessary to revoke the new powers of attorney, to re-enact the original powers of attorney, and to pay KCS its costs and attorneys fees for bringing the motion for contempt.

Mexican Government’s Put Rights With Respect to TFM Stock.The Mexican government has the right to compel the purchase of its 20% interest in TFM (referred to as the “Put”) by Grupo TFM following notification by the Mexican government in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements. Upon exercise of the Put, Grupo TFM would be obligated to purchase the TFM capital stock at the initial share price paid by Grupo TFM adjusted for interest and inflation. Prior to October 30, 2003, Grupo TFM filed suit in the Federal District Court of Mexico City seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment interpreting whether Grupo TFM was obligated to honor its obligation under the Put Agreement, as the Mexican government had not made any effort to sell the TFM shares subject to the Put prior to October 31, 2003. In its suit, Grupo TFM named Grupo TMM and KCS as additional interested parties. The Mexican government has provided Grupo TFM with notice of its intention to sell its interest in TFM. Grupo TFM has responded to the Mexican government’s notice reaffirming its right and interest in purchasing the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM, but also advising the Mexican government that it would not take any action until its lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment was resolved. Grupo TFM has received an injunction, which blocks the Mexican government from exercising the Put. Following the resolution of the lawsuit in Mexico or the lifting of this injunction, in the event that Grupo TFM does not purchase the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM, Grupo TMM and KCS, or either of Grupo TMM or KCS alone, would, following notification by the Mexican government in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements, be obligated to purchase the Mexican government’s remaining interest in TFM. Based upon public disclosures made by Grupo TMM, it is not in a position to make this purchase. If the Acquisition is completed prior to the purchase of the Mexican government’s interest in TFM, KCS will be solely responsible for purchasing the Mexican government’s 20% interest in TFM. If KCS had been required to purchase this interest as of December 31, 2003, the total purchase price would have been approximately $467.7 million.

Value Added Tax (“VAT”) Lawsuit and VAT Contingency Payment under the Acquisition Agreement.The VAT lawsuit (“VAT Claim”), which has been pending in the Mexican courts since 1997, arose out of the Mexican Treasury’s delivery of a VAT credit certificate to a Mexican governmental agency rather than to TFM. The face value of the VAT credit at issue is 2,111,111,790 pesos or approximately $192 million in U.S. dollars, based on current exchange rates. The amount of any recovery would, in accordance with Mexican law, reflect the face value of the VAT credit adjusted for inflation and interest accruals from 1997, with certain limitations.

In September 2002, the Mexican appellate court issued a judgment in favor of TFM on the VAT Claim, vacating a prior judgment of the Mexican Fiscal Court and remanding the case to the Fiscal Court with specific instructions to enter a new decision consistent with the guidance provided by the Mexican appellate court’s ruling. The Mexican appellate court’s ruling required the fiscal authorities to issue the VAT credit certificate only in the name of TFM. On December 6, 2002, the upper chamber of the Fiscal Court issued a ruling denying TFM’s right to receive a VAT refund from the Mexican Federal Government. In June 2003, the Mexican appellate court issued a judgment in favor of TFM against the ruling of the Fiscal Court. The judgment granted TFM constitutional protection against the ruling of the Fiscal Court issued on December 6, 2002 denying TFM’s right to receive the VAT refund. The judgment ordered the Fiscal Court to vacate its December 6, 2002 resolution and to issue a new resolution following the guidelines of the Mexican appellate court’s judgment. The Mexican appellate court found that the VAT refund certificate had not been delivered to TFM, and confirmed the Fiscal Court’s determination that TFM has the right to receive the VAT refund certificate. The Mexican appellate court’s ruling states that the Treasury’s decision denying delivery of the VAT refund certificate to TFM violated the law, and it instructs that the VAT reimbursement certificate be issued to TFM on the terms established by Article 22 of the Federal Fiscal Code in effect at that time. As a result of the Mexican appellate court’s ruling, the case was remanded to the Mexican Fiscal Court. On August 14, 2003, Grupo TMM announced that in a public session held August 13, the Mexican Fiscal Court issued a resolution regarding TFM’s VAT Claim vacating its previous resolution of December 6, 2002, and, in strict compliance with the ruling issued on June 11, 2003 by the Mexican appellate court, resolved that TFM has proved its case, and that a “ficta denial” occurred, declaring such denial null and void as ordered by the Mexican appellate court. On October 3, 2003, Grupo TMM announced that the Tax Attorney of the Mexican government had filed for a review of the ruling.

TFM received, on January 19, 2004, a Special Certificate from the Mexican Federal Treasury in the amount of 2.1 billion pesos as discussed above. The Special Certificate represents the refund of the value added tax paid and may be used by TFM to satisfy any tax liabilities due. The Special Certificate has the same face amount as the VAT refund claimed by TFM. TFM was served on January 20, 2004 with an official letter notifying TFM of the Mexican Government’s findings and conclusions arising from its tax audit of TFM’s 1997 tax returns (“Tax Audit Summary”). In the Tax Audit Summary, the Mexican government notified TFM of its preliminary conclusion that the documentation provided by TFM in support of the VAT refund and TFM’s basis in the concession title, locomotives and rail equipment, and capital leases purchased by TFM’s predecessor in interest, Ferrocarril del Noreste, S.A. de C.V., prior to Grupo TFM’s purchase of 80% of the shares of TFM, do not comply with the formalities required by the applicable tax legislation. If sustained, the conclusions of the Tax Audit Summary would prevent TFM from depreciating the concession title, locomotives and rail equipment, and capital leases that represent the majority of the value of the assets owned by TFM. The Tax Audit Summary also seized the Special Certificate received by TFM on January 19, 2004 from the Mexican Federal Treasury in the amount of 2,111,111,790 pesos, pending resolution of the audit, as a potential asset to be used to satisfy any tax obligations owed by TFM as a result of the audit. TFM has advised that it has, within the time allowed by the Tax Audit Summary, contested the conclusions of the Mexican tax authorities, and it has filed a constitutional appeal against the Tax Audit Summary, alleging that the process followed by the Mexican government violated TFM’s constitutional rights. TFM has also filed a complaint seeking an order that would require the Mexican government to issue a new Special Certificate in the amount of the original VAT refunded, adjusted to reflect interest and penalties from 1997 in accordance with applicable Mexican law and regulations.

In addition, provided the Acquisition has occurred and neither KCS nor any of its subsidiaries has purchased the Mexican government’s TFM shares upon exercise of the Put, KCS will be obligated to pay to Grupo TMM an

additional amount (referred to as the “VAT Contingency Payment”) of up to $180 million in cash in the event that the VAT Claim is successfully resolved and the amount received is greater than the purchase price of the Put. If the Acquisition is completed, KCS will assume Grupo TMM’s obligations to make any payment upon the exercise by the Mexican government of the Put and will indemnify Grupo TMM and its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees and shareholders, against obligations or liabilities relating thereto.

Because TFM has not recognized its claim as an asset for financial accounting purposes, any recovery by TFM would likely be recognized by TFM as income thereby favorably impacting the Company’s recognition of its equity in earnings in Grupo TFM. The Company is presently unable to predict the amount or timing of any VAT refund recovery.

Mexrail Transactions. On May 9, 2003, pursuant to the terms of a stock purchase agreement for KCS to acquire control of Mexrail (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), KCS acquired from Grupo TMM (through its subsidiary TFM) 51% of the shares of Mexrail for approximately $32.7 million. KCS deposited the Mexrail shares into a voting trust pending resolution of KCS’s application to the STB seeking authority to exercise common control over Tex-Mex, KCSR and Gateway Eastern. The Stock Purchase Agreement provided TFM the right to repurchase all of the Mexrail stock acquired by the Company at any time for the purchase price paid by the Company, subject to any STB orders or directions. In August 2003, KCS received a demand from TFM to repurchase those Mexrail shares. In September 2003, the STB issued a decision finding no need to rule on the transfer back to TFM of the 51% interest in Mexrail that KCS acquired. The repurchase of Mexrail by TFM closed on September 30, 2003 returning 100% ownership of Mexrail to TFM and the Stock Purchase Agreement automatically terminated. The repurchase price was $32.7 million; the same price KCS paid TFM in May 2003. The Stock Purchase Agreement, however, provided that in the event TFM reacquired the Mexrail shares from KCS, the parties to the Stock Purchase Agreement intended the terms and conditions of a February 27, 2002 stock purchase agreement under which TFM acquired the Mexrail shares, the Grupo TFM bylaws and the shareholders agreement dated May 1997 to become again valid and fully enforceable against the parties to such agreements.

On February 27, 2002, KCS, Grupo TMM, and certain of Grupo TMM’s affiliates entered into a stock purchase agreement with TFM to sell to TFM all of the common stock of Mexrail. Under the February 27, 2002 stock purchase agreement, KCS retained rights to prevent further sale or transfer of the stock or significant assets of Mexrail and Tex-Mex and the right to continue to participate in the corporate governance of Mexrail and Tex-Mex, which will remain U.S. corporations and subject to KCS’s super majority rights contained in Grupo TFM’s bylaws.

The sale closed on March 27, 2002 and the Company received approximately $31.4 million for its 49% interest in Mexrail. The Company used the proceeds from the sale of Mexrail to reduce debt. Although the Company no longer directly owns 49% of Mexrail, it retains an indirect ownership through its ownership of Grupo TFM. The proceeds from the sale of Mexrail to TFM exceeded the carrying value of the Company’s investment in Mexrail by $11.2 million. The Company recognized a $4.4 million gain on the sale of Mexrail to TFM in the first quarter of 2002, while the remaining $6.8 million of excess proceeds was deferred and is being amortized over 20 years.

STB Review Status. KCS filed with the STB on May 13, 2003 a Railroad Control Application, seeking permission to exercise common control over KCSR, Gateway Eastern and Tex-Mex. On June 9, 2003, the STB issued its decision, effective June 13, 2003, finding that the transaction proposed in KCS’s application is a “minor transaction” under 49 CFR 1180.2(c), although KCS was required to supplement its application as discussed in the decision, to address some of the implications of KCS’s acquisition of control of TFM. KCS filed the supplement on June 23, 2003, as required by the decision. The STB also outlined a procedural schedule for consideration of KCS’s application to exercise common control over KCSR, Gateway Eastern and Tex-Mex. The STB decision set October 17, 2003 as the date by which it would issue its final decision on the merits of the application. On September 23, 2003, the STB entered an order asking all interested parties to file comments by

September 30, 2003 addressing whether “in light of recent developments” the STB should continue with the procedural schedule, which called for a decision on the merits to be issued by October 17, 2003. On September 30, 2003, KCS filed comments with the STB suggesting that STB precedent establishes that the STB has sufficient jurisdiction to rule on control applications even where closing on the underlying transaction has been put in doubt. In the alternative, KCS argued that the matter should be held in abeyance, rather than dismissed, until the arbitration is completed. On October 8, 2003, the STB issued an order suspending the procedural schedule pending a resolution of the uncertainties that surround KCS’s efforts to acquire control of Tex-Mex, and requiring KCS to file status reports regarding developments in its efforts to acquire control of TFM and Tex-Mex. In accordance with the STB’s order, KCS filed its first status report on November 3, 2003, and a follow-up status report was filed on February 2, 2004.

SOUTHERN CAPITAL

In 1996, the Company and GATX Capital Corporation (“GATX”) completed a transaction for the formation and financing of a joint venture, Southern Capital, to perform certain leasing and financing activities.Capital. Southern Capital’s principal operations are the acquisition of locomotives, rolling stock and other railroad equipment and the leasing thereof to the Company.thereof. The Company holds a 50%fifty percent interest in Southern Capital, which it accounts for using the equity method of accounting.

Concurrent with the formation of this joint venture, the Company entered into operating leases with Southern Capital for substantially all the locomotives and rolling stock contributed or sold to Southern Capital at rental rates which management believes reflected market conditions at that time.

KCSR paid Southern Capital $35.3$26.5 million, $28.7$30.1 million and $28.8$32.5 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, under these operating leases in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.leases. In connection with the formation of Southern Capital, the Company received cash that exceeded the net book value of assets contributed to the joint venture by approximately $44.1 million. Accordingly, this excess fair value over book value is being recognized as a reduction in lease rental expense over the terms of the leases (approximately $4.5equal to $2.7 million, $4.5$3.6 million and $4.4 million in 2003, 20022006, 2005 and 2001, respectively). During 2001,2004, respectively. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company received cash dividends of $3.0$4.5 million, $8.3 million and $8.8 million, respectively, from Southern Capital. No dividends were received from
During 2005 and 2004, Southern Capital during 2003 or 2002.

During 2001,recorded gains of $7.7 million and $6.0 million, respectively, related to the sale of locomotives to KCSR, but Southern Capital refinancedrecorded no such gains in 2006. For purposes of recording its five-year credit facility, which was scheduledshare of Southern Capital earnings, the Company has recorded its share of the gains as a reduction to mature on October 19, 2001, withthe cost basis of the equipment acquired. As a one-year bridge loan for $201 million. result, the Company will recognize its equity in the gains over the remaining depreciable life of the locomotives as a reduction of depreciation expense.

On June 25,5, 2002, Southern Capital refinanced the outstanding balance of thisa bridge loan through the issuance of approximately $167.6 million of 5.7% pass through trust certificates and proceeds from the sale of 50 locomotives. Of this amount, $104.0 million iswas secured by all of the locomotives and rolling stock owned by Southern Capital (other than the 50 locomotives, which were sold, as discussed below) and rental payments payable by KCSR under the operating and financing leases of the equipment owned by Southern Capital. Payments of interest and principal of the pass through trust certificates, which are due semi-annually on June 30 and December 30 commencing on December 30, 2002 and ending on June 30,through 2022, are insured under a financial guarantee insurance policy by MBIA Insurance Corporation.Corporation (“MBIA”). KCSR leases or subleases all of the equipment securing the pass through certificates.

The remaining amount of Certificates,pass through trust certificates, approximately $63.6 million, was assigned to General Electric Corporation, (“GE”), the buyer of the 50 locomotives, and is secured by the sold locomotives.locomotives and


72


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

rental payments payable by KCSR under the sublease. Southern Capital does not have the option, nor is it obligated to repurchase or redeem the lease receivable or related equipment on or prior to the expiration of the lease agreement entered into with KCSR at the time of the sale. Southern Capital does not guarantee the lease payments of KCSR and has no obligation to make such payments if KCSR should fail to do so. In the event of a default by KCSR, a third party insurance company, MBIA guarantees the outstanding debt and may seize the collateralized assets, or find a third party lessee to continue making the rental payments to satisfy the debt requirements.

PANAMA CANAL RAILWAY COMPANYPanama Canal Railway Company.

In January 1998,

PCRC, a joint venture company owed equally by KCS and Mi-Jack Products, Inc., has the concession from the Republic of Panama awarded PCRC, a joint venture between KCSR and Mi-Jack Products, Inc. (“Mi-Jack”), the concession to reconstruct and operate the Panama Canal Railway, a47-mile railroad located adjacent to the Panama Canal that provides international shippers with a railway transportation option to complement the Panama Canal. The Panama Canal Railway which traces its origins back to the late 1800’s, is a north-south railroad traversing the Panama isthmus between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The railroad has been reconstructed and it resumed freight operations on December 1, 2001. Panarail operates and promotes commuter and tourist passenger service over the Panama Canal Railway. Passenger service started during July 2001.

As of December 31, 2003, the

The Company has invested approximately $21.0$31.5 million ($12.9 million of equity and $18.6 million of subordinated loans) toward the reconstruction and operations of the Panama Canal Railway. This investment is comprisedRailway as of $12.9 million of equity and $8.1 million of subordinated loans. TheseDecember 31, 2006. The loans carry a 10% interest rate and are payable on demand, subject to certain restrictions.

In November 1999,

PCRC completed the financing arrangements for thisthe reconstruction project with the International Finance Corporation (“IFC”), a member of the World Bank Group. The financing is comprised of a $5 million investment by the IFC and senior loans through the IFC in an aggregate amount of up to $45 million. Additionally, PCRC has $3.5 million of equipment loans and other capital leases totaling $3.0 million. The IFC’s investment of $5 million in PCRC is comprised of non-voting preferred shares which pay a 10% cumulative dividend. Under the terms of the loan agreement with IFC, the Company is a guarantor for up to $5.6$4.4 million of the associated debt. Also if PCRC terminates the concession contract without the IFC’s consent, the Company is a guarantor for up to 50%half of the outstanding senior loans. The Company is also a guarantor for up to $1.8$0.5 million of the equipment loans and capital leases, and has issued two irrevocable letters of credit totaling approximately $100,000 relating$2.0 million to fulfill the Company’s fifty percent guarantee of approximately $4.0 million equipment loan.
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico Valley Railway and Terminal or “FTVM”).
FTVM provides railroad services as well as ancillary services, including those related to interconnection, switching and haulage services in the greater Mexico City area. KCSM holds 25% of the share capital of FTVM. The other shareholders of FTVM, each holding a 25% interest, are Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V. (“Ferromex”), Ferrocarril del Sureste, S.A. de C.V. (“Ferrosur”) and the Mexican government.
Pursuant to the other capital leases. The costconcession, KCSM is required to grant rights to use portions of its track to Ferromex, Ferrosur and FTVM, and these companies are required to grant KCSM the reconstruction totaled approximately $80 million.

rights to use portions of their tracks.

Financial Information.
Financial information of unconsolidated affiliates that the Company and its subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method follows.is presented below(in millions). Amounts, including those for Grupo TFM,KCSM, are presented under U.S. GAAP. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to reflect amounts from applicable audited financial statements (in millions).


73

   

December 31, 2003


 
   Grupo
TFM


  Southern
Capital


  PCRC

 

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

  $392.1  $28.0  $4.5 

Equity in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates

   378.9   28.0   4.5 

Financial Condition:

             

Current assets

  $225.7  $5.0  $3.6 

Non-current assets

   2,111.8   127.3   84.2 
   

  

  


Assets

  $2,337.5  $132.3  $87.8 
   

  

  


Current liabilities

  $362.7  $1.2  $9.9 

Non-current liabilities

   806.7   75.0   68.9 

Minority interest

   354.9   —     —   

Equity of stockholders and partners

   813.2   56.1   9.0 
   

  

  


Liabilities and equity

  $2,337.5  $132.3  $87.8 
   

  

  


Operating results:

             

Revenues

  $698.5  $31.3  $7.7 
   

  

  


Costs and expenses

  $591.0  $27.6  $13.8 
   

  

  


Net income (loss)

  $27.3  $3.6  $(6.1)
   

  

  


   December 31, 2002

 
   Grupo
TFM


  Southern
Capital


  PCRC

 

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

  $380.1  $24.9  $7.5 

Equity in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates

   366.0   24.9   7.5 

Financial Condition:

             

Current assets

  $265.2  $5.5  $8.8 

Non-current assets

   2,061.3   139.4   83.3 
   

  

  


Assets

  $2,326.5  $144.9  $92.1 
   

  

  


Current liabilities

  $147.3  $—    $4.0 

Non-current liabilities

   1,045.3   95.1   73.1 

Minority interest

   348.0   —     —   

Equity of stockholders and partners

   785.9   49.8   15.0 
   

  

  


Liabilities and equity

  $2,326.5  $144.9  $92.1 
   

  

  


Operating results:

             

Revenues

  $712.1  $31.0  $5.0 
   

  

  


Costs and expenses

  $553.0  $26.4  $12.9 
   

  

  


Net income (loss)

  $110.2  $2.7  $(7.9)
   

  

  


   

December 31, 2001


 
   Grupo
TFM


  Southern
Capital


  Mexrail

  PCRC

 

Operating results:

                 

Revenues

  $667.8  $30.2  $55.0  $1.8 
   

  

  


 


Costs and expenses

  $457.7  $25.5  $58.2  $3.2 
   

  

  


 


Net income

  $76.7  $4.8  $(2.0) $(2.0)
   

  

  


 



The Company, Grupo TFM, and certain of their affiliates entered into an agreement on February 27, 2002 with TFM

Kansas City Southern
Notes to sellConsolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

             
  As of and for the Year ended
 
  December 31, 2006 
     Southern    
  FTVM  Capital  PCRC 
 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates $13.9  $29.2  $18.3 
Equity in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates  12.6   29.2   (0.3)
Financial condition:
            
Current assets $46.4  $2.4  $5.4 
Other assets  33.9   87.1   78.7 
             
Assets $80.3  $89.5  $84.1 
             
Current liabilities $13.5  $  $14.6 
Long-term liabilities  16.5   31.1   70.0 
Equity of stockholders and partners  50.3   58.4   (0.5)
             
Liabilities and equity $80.3  $89.5  $84.1 
             
Operating results:
            
Revenues $60.5  $18.1  $19.0 
Expenses  45.7   7.4   20.9 
             
Net income (loss) $14.8  $10.7  $(1.9)
             

             
  As of and for the
    
  Nine Months
  As of and for the
 
  Ended
  Year Ended
 
  December 31, 2005  December 31, 2005 
     Southern
    
  FTVM  Capital  PCRC 
 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates $10.9  $27.9  $18.1 
Equity in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates  9.6   27.9   0.6 
Financial condition:
            
Current assets $35.4  $5.2  $5.2 
Other assets  28.1   92.8   81.5 
             
Assets $63.5  $98.0  $86.7 
             
Current liabilities $9.3  $1.0  $13.9 
Long-term liabilities  15.8   41.2   71.5 
Equity of stockholders and partners  38.4   55.8   1.3 
             
Liabilities and equity $63.5  $98.0  $86.7 
             
Operating results:
            
Revenues $55.3  $27.4  $17.5 
Expenses  45.9   14.3   21.0 
             
Net income (loss) $9.4  $13.1  $(3.5)
             

74


Kansas City Southern
Notes to TFMConsolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                 
  As of and for the Year Ended
 
  December 31, 2004 
     Grupo
  Southern
    
  Mexrail  KCSM  Capital  PCRC 
 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates $30.0  $389.6  $29.1  $13.4 
Equity in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates  27.1   375.0   29.1   2.4 
Financial condition:
                
Current assets $29.8  $252.7  $2.3  $4.2 
Other assets  71.2   1,982.3   113.5   83.4 
                 
Assets $101.0  $2,235.0  $115.8  $87.6 
                 
Current liabilities  47.3   211.5   1.2   10.7 
Long-term liabilities  0.7   865.4   56.5   72.2 
Minority interest     353.3       
Equity of stockholders and partners  53.0   804.8   58.1   4.7 
                 
Liabilities and equity $101.0  $2,235.0  $115.8  $87.6 
                 
Operating results:
                
Revenues $66.5  $701.8  $29.0  $10.1 
Expenses  74.4   710.1   17.2   14.3 
                 
Net income (loss) $(7.9) $(8.3) $11.8  $(4.2)
                 

KCSM purchased all of the common stockshares of Mexrail. The sale closedMexrail from TMM and KCS on March 27, 2002. Accordingly for 2003 and 2002,the period from January 1, 2004, through July 31, 2004, the results of Mexrail have beenare consolidated into the results of Grupo TFM.

The effects of foreign currency transactions and capitalized interest prior to June 23, 1997, which are not recorded on Grupo TFM’s books, result in the difference between the carrying amount of the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM and the underlying equity in net assets. Additionally, the purchase by TFM of the Mexican government’s former 24.6% interest in Grupo TFM resulted in a reduction of Grupo TFM’s stockholder’s equity as the purchased shares from the Mexican government were recorded as treasury shares at Grupo TFM. The Company invested no funds in this transaction, however, and, therefore, it did not have an impact on the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM. As a result, the difference between the Company’s equity in net assets of Grupo TFM and its underlying investment arising as a result of this transaction is being amortized against the Company’s equity in earnings from Grupo TFM over a 33 year period, which was the estimate of the average remaining useful life of Grupo TFM’s concession assets.

The deferred income tax calculations for Grupo TFM are significantly impacted by fluctuations in the relative value of the Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar and the rate of Mexican inflation, and can result in significant variability in the amount of equity earnings (losses) reported by the Company.

Foreign Exchange Matters.KCSM.

Note 4.  Acquisitions
In connectionaccordance with the Company’s investment in Grupo TFM, matters arise with respect to financial accounting and reporting for foreign currency transactions and for translating foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars. The Company follows the requirements outlined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” (“SFAS 52”)141 “Business Combinations”, the Company allocates the purchase price of its acquisitions to the tangible and related authoritative

guidance.intangible assets and liabilities of the acquired entity based on their fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value is recorded as goodwill. The fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities are based on valuations prepared by independent third party appraisal firms, published market prices and management estimates.

Acquisition of Controlling Interest in Grupo TFM usesKCSM.
April 1, 2005 — Acquisition Agreement.  In furtherance of the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Equity earnings (losses) fromCompany’s strategy for expansion into Mexico, on December 15, 2004, the Company entered into the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) with TMM and other parties under which KCS would acquire control of KCSM through the purchase of shares of common stock of Grupo TFM includedKCSM. At the time, Grupo KCSM held an 80% interest in KCSM and all of the shares of stock with full voting rights of KCSM. The remaining 20% economic interest in KCSM was owned by the Mexican government in the Company’s resultsform of operationsshares with limited voting rights.
Under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, KCS acquired all of TMM’s 48.5% effective interest in Grupo KCSM on April 1, 2005, in exchange for $200.0 million in cash, 18 million shares of KCS common stock, and two-year promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $47.0 million (the “Escrow Notes”), as well as $27.5 million in transaction costs for a total purchase price of $594.4 million. The $47.0 million Escrow Notes are subject to reduction pursuant to the indemnification provisions of the Acquisition Agreement for

75


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

certain potential losses related to incorrect representations and warranties, or breaches of covenants in the Acquisition Agreement or claims relating thereto, or under other conditions specified in the Indemnity Escrow Agreement.
In exchange for the purchase price of $594.4 million, KCS acquired 48.5% of Grupo KCSM (or 38.8% of KCSM). On a preliminary basis, the excess of purchase price over the historical book value of the assets resulted in a net increase in the basis of the assets of $199.6 million. As a result of the ongoing valuation of certain assets and liabilities, during the fourth quarter of 2005, Grupo KCSM and KCSM recognized changes to the preliminary allocation of purchase price, which was pushed down by KCS. In addition, the KCS purchase price was increased $4.4 million, relating primarily to an increase in the estimates for severance and relocation costs.
In connection with the evaluation of the fair values of the assets and liabilities of Grupo KCSM, certain assets were identified as having little or no value to KCS as the acquiring company. Because KCS acquired only 48.5% of Grupo KCSM (or 38.8% of KCSM) in this transaction, the allocation of the excess purchase price over book value of net assets was limited to the acquired percentage. Accordingly, a reduction in the assets of Grupo KCSM was limited to the acquired percentage and any residual was charged to expense. Grupo KCSM operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 included $39.5 million relating to decreases in the basis of certain assets, the most significant of which was the write off of a deferred employee profit sharing asset of $35.6 million as a result of legal rulings in Mexico.
September 12, 2005, Completion of VAT/Put Settlement.  On September 12, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries, KCSM and Grupo KCSM, along with TMM, entered into a settlement agreement with the Mexican government, resolving the controversies and disputes between the companies and the Mexican government concerning the payment of a value added tax (“VAT”) refund to KCSM and the obligation (“Put”) to purchase the remaining shares of KCSM owned by the Mexican government (the “VAT/Put Settlement”). As a result of the VAT/Put Settlement, KCS and its subsidiaries own 100% of Grupo KCSM and KCSM; the potential obligation of KCS, Grupo KCSM and TMM to acquire the Mexican government’s remaining 20% ownership of KCSM was eliminated; and the legal obligation of the Mexican government to issue the VAT refund to KCSM was satisfied. There was no cash exchanged between the parties to the settlement agreement. In addition, the parties entered into mutual releases of all existing and potential claims relating to the VAT refund and the Put obligation, and entered into an agreement to dismiss all of the existing litigation between the parties.
The VAT/Put Settlement had two separate impacts — first, the resolution of a pre-acquisition contingency related to the April 1, 2005, transaction and second, KCSM’s acquisition of the minority interest held by the Mexican government.
Resolution of Pre-Acquisition Contingencies.
Both the VAT refund claim and the Mexican government’s put rights were pre-acquisition contingencies. Accordingly, the impact of the acquired asset and the resulting liability was reflected as adjustments to the preliminary purchase accounting described above. Because there was no market for Grupo KCSM stock, management assessed the fair value of the government’s shares acquired in the settlement to be properly estimated as the pro rata equivalent of the fair value of Grupo KCSM stock paid to TMM under the Acquisition Agreement. Based on this assessment, the fair value of the Mexican government’s shares was determined to be $305.5 million.
Under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, KCS acquired TMM’s 51% interest in the VAT refund claim as settled. Accordingly, the preliminary purchase accounting for the Grupo KCSM acquisition was adjusted to reflect as an asset the Company’sfair value of the acquisition of TMM’s proportionate share of any such translation gainsthe VAT refund claim of $155.8 million.


76


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

In accordance with the Acquisition Agreement, a contingent payment of an additional purchase price of $110.0 million became payable to TMM as a result of the final resolution of the VAT Claim and losses that Grupo TFM recordsPut, which was to be settled in three parts: (i) $35.0 million in stock (shares determined based on the VWAP 20 days prior to the final resolution of the VAT Claim and Put, as defined in the processAcquisition Agreement); (ii) $35.0 million in cash at time of translating certain transactionsfinal resolution of the VAT Claim and Put, as defined in the Acquisition Agreement; and (iii) up to an additional $40.0 million in stock (shares to be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement) payable no more than five years from the final closing date (April 1, 2005). The liability was non-interest bearing, therefore it was recorded at its present value based on a 5.0% discount rate, consistent with the stated rate of similar interest bearing notes in the Acquisition Agreement.
The remaining fair value of the Mexican pesosgovernment’s shares obtained in the VAT/Put Settlement, $149.7 million, was attributable to U.S. dollars.

the previously existing 49% KCS interest in Grupo KCSM and was recorded as nonoperating income and was presented net of applicable legal, consulting and other fees of $17.8 million including, $9.0 million payable to JSIB, which became payable on final resolution of the VAT Claim and Put. The VAT/Put settlement gain was not taxable in Mexico. The Company continuesbelieves, based upon opinions of outside legal counsel and other factors, that the VAT/Put Settlement should not be taxable to evaluate existing alternativesKCS for U.S. income tax purposes. Such position has not been examined by the taxing authority and it is possible that this position could be challenged. The amount of such tax would be material; however the Company believes that it would have the right to indemnification under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement.

KCSM Acquisition of Mexican Government Shares.
In connection with respectthe VAT/Put Settlement, the acquisition of the Mexican government’s interest was accounted for as a purchase. The aggregate carrying value of $375.6 million for the Mexican government shares (23.9% effective ownership — consisting of minority interest of $256.9 million and the Association in Participation Agreement with a book value of $118.7 million) exceeded the estimated fair value of this interest of $305.5 million representing the purchase price.
Purchase Price Allocation.
The allocation of the purchase price was finalized in 2006. Final adjustments to utilizing foreign currency instruments to hedge its U.S. dollar investment in Grupo TFM as market conditionsthe purchase price allocation did not materially change the initial allocation or exchange rates fluctuate. Atfinancial results during the year. Settlement of severance and relocation was substantially completed during the year ended December 31, 2003, 20022006.
Significant components of the allocation of the excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the net assets acquired, including both the April 1, 2005, and 2001, the Company had no outstanding foreign currency hedging instruments.

ResultsSeptember 12, 2005, acquisitions, follow(in millions):

     
Increase in current assets $10.6 
Decrease in property and equipment  (29.0)
Increase in concession assets  271.3 
Increase in deferred income taxes  (81.9)
Increase in other assets  83.6 
Increase in current liabilities  (15.3)
Increase in long-term liabilities  (111.5)
     
Total $127.8 
     
In addition, the existing excess in the carrying value of the Company’s investment over the book value of Grupo KCSM ($13.7 million) was recorded as an addition to property, plant and equipment, and Concession assets.


77


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table summarizes the recorded fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the dates of acquisition as adjusted for the above impacts(in millions):
     
Current assets $268.8 
Property and equipment  532.6 
Concession rights  1,383.1 
Other assets  219.0 
     
Total assets acquired $2,403.5 
     
Current liabilities $288.3 
Long-term debt  802.6 
Other liabilities  128.2 
     
Total liabilities acquired $1,219.1 
     
Acquisition of Mexrail.
On August 16, 2004, KCS, TMM and KCSM entered into a new Stock Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of that agreement, KCS purchased from KCSM 51% of the outstanding shares of Mexrail, a wholly-owned subsidiary of KCSM, for $32.7 million and placed those shares into trust pending approval of the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) to exercise common control over KCSR, the Gateway Eastern Railway Company (“Gateway Eastern”) and Tex-Mex. On November 29, 2004, the STB approved the Company’s application for authority to control KCSR, Gateway Eastern and Tex-Mex. The shares representing 51% ownership of Mexrail were transferred by the trustee to KCS, and KCS assumed control, on January 1, 2005.
The aggregate purchase price was $57.4 million including $32.7 million of cash with the remaining amount consisting of net receivables and payables with Mexrail and Grupo TFM are reported under U.S. GAAP while Grupo TFM reports itsKCSM. The acquisition of Mexrail links KCSR physically to KCSM.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition on January 1, 2005(in millions):
     
Current assets $37.8 
Property and equipment  108.2 
Other assets  0.3 
     
Total assets acquired $146.3 
     
Current liabilities $59.7 
Other liabilities  29.3 
     
Total liabilities acquired $89.0 
     
The allocation of the purchase price above reflected the final adjustments to the fair values of assets and liabilities of Mexrail. All severance reserves recorded for the Mexrail acquisition were expended prior to December 31, 2005.


78


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Pro Forma Earnings.  The following table reflects the pro forma financial results under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Becausefor the Company is required to report its equitytwelve months ended December 31, 2005, as though the Grupo KCSM acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2005(unaudited, in millions except share and per share data):
                 
  KCS and Mexrail
  Grupo KCSM
       
  Historical and
  Three Months
       
  Grupo KCSM
  Ended
       
  Since April 1,
  March 31,
  Pro Forma
    
  2005  2005  Adjustments  Pro Forma 
 
Revenues $1,352.0  $170.1  $  $1,522.1 
Net income (loss)  100.9   0.1   (150.1)  (49.1)
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders  91.4   0.1   (150.1)  (58.6)
                 
Earnings (loss) per common share:                
Basic $1.21          $(0.74)
                 
Diluted  1.10           (0.74)
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding(in thousands):
                
Basic  75,527       3,750   79,277 
                 
Diluted  92,747       (13,470)  79,277 
                 
For purposes of comparison, pro forma earnings (losses) in Grupo TFM under U.S. GAAP and Grupo TFM reports under IFRS, differences in deferred income tax calculations and the classification of certain operating expense categories occur. The deferred income tax calculations are significantly impacted by fluctuations in the relative value of the Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar and the rate of Mexican inflation, and can result in significant variability in the amount of equity earnings (losses) reportedwere reduced by the Company.

$131.9 million non-recurring, non-cash gain on the VAT/Put settlement.

Note 4.
Note 5.  Other Balance Sheet Captions

Other Balance Sheet Captions

Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable includeCurrent Assets.  Other current assets included the following items at December 31(in millions):

         
  2006  2005 
 
Prepaid expenses $16.4  $10.1 
Deferred income taxes  7.6   10.0 
Deferred charge related to favorable railcar leases  11.3   11.3 
Assets held for sale  47.9    
Other  10.5   14.7 
         
Other current assets, net $93.7  $46.1 
         


79

   2003

  2002

 

Accounts receivable

  $125.0  $127.5 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (10.4)  (9.0)
   


 


Accounts receivable, net

  $114.6  $118.5 
   


 


Bad debt expense

  $1.9  $0.5 
   


 


Other Current Assets. Other current assets include the following items(in millions):


   2003

  2002

Deferred income taxes

  $10.3  $18.7

Federal income taxes receivable

   —     16.6

Prepaid expenses

   2.9   3.8

Other

   8.1   5.4
   

  

Total

  $21.3  $44.5
   

  

Kansas City Southern
Properties.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued) Properties

Property and Equipment.  Property and equipment and related accumulated depreciation are summarized below at December 31(in millions):
         
  2006  2005 
 
Road properties $2,118.4  $1,982.5 
Equipment  468.4   388.0 
Concession improvements  324.3   296.1 
Computer software  76.1   71.8 
Locomotives sale-leaseback     32.5 
Other  38.9   166.7 
         
Total  3,026.1   2,937.6 
Accumulated depreciation  897.0   820.4 
         
Net property and equipment  2,129.1   2,117.2 
Construction in progress  323.1   181.1 
         
Property and equipment, net $2,452.2  $2,298.3 
         
Depreciation of property and equipment totaled $93.8 million, $82.5 million, and $53.3 million, respectively, for 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Overhead Capitalization.  KCS capitalizes certain overhead costs representing the indirect costs associated with construction and improvement projects. Overhead factors are periodically reviewed and adjusted to reflect current costs.
Concession Assets.  As discussed in Note 1, the Mexican government granted KCSM the Concession to operate the northeast rail lines in Mexico. Concession assets and related amortization are summarized below at December 31(in millions):
         
  2006  2005 
 
Road properties $1,231.4  $1,227.6 
Land  135.3   132.8 
Other  32.3   41.2 
         
Total  1,399.0   1,401.6 
Accumulated amortization  95.7   41.2 
         
Concession assets, net $1,303.3  $1,360.4 
         
Amortization of concession assets totaled $60.4 million and $44.9 million for 2006 and 2005.


80

   2003

  2002

Properties, at cost

        

Road properties

  $1,663.3  $1,606.4

Equipment

   275.1   280.5

Computer software

   64.6   62.4

Equipment under capital leases

   6.6   6.6

Other

   8.7   8.4
   

  

Total

   2,018.3   1,964.3

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   734.3   702.3
   

  

Total

   1,284.0   1,262.0

Construction in progress

   78.5   75.4
   

  

Net Properties

  $1,362.5  $1,337.4
   

  


For

Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Accrued Liabilities.  Accrued liabilities included the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company capitalized approximately $7.0 and $2.0 million, respectively, of costs related to capital projects for which no cash outlay had yet occurred. These costs were included in accounts payable and accrued liabilitiesfollowing items at December 31 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities. Accrued liabilities include the following items (in millions):

   2003

  2002

Claims reserves

  $34.4  $35.3

Prepaid freight charges due other railroads

   19.7   24.5

Car hire per diem

   9.0   11.5

Vacation accrual

   7.8   7.8

Property and other taxes

   5.2   4.4

Interest payable

   6.6   6.4

Other

   36.7   38.7
   

  

Total

  $119.4  $128.6
   

  

Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Deferred Credits. Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits include the following items (in millions):

   2003

  2002

Claims reserves

  $36.6  $25.1

Accrued employee benefits

   9.0   8.8

Deferred gain on sale of equipment to Southern Capital

   13.7   18.7

Deferred gain on sale of Mexrail

   6.1   6.5

Other

   44.0   45.1
   

  

Total

  $109.4  $104.2
   

  

Note 5. Long-Term Debt

Indebtedness Outstanding.Long-term debt and pertinent provisions follow(in millions):

         
  2006  2005 
 
Interest payable $16.7  $17.9 
Vacation accrual  13.2   12.6 
Car hire per diem  27.2   28.1 
Prepaid freight charges due other railroads  37.2   36.9 
Claim reserves  88.9   55.1 
Deferred credits related to unfavorable locomotive leases and maintenance contracts  9.7   9.7 
Property and other taxes  32.4   24.8 
Other  129.4   148.0 
         
Accrued liabilities $354.7  $333.1 
         
Note 6.  Long-Term Debt
Indebtedness Outstanding.  Long-term debt follows at December 31(in millions):
         
  2006  2005 
 
KCS
        
Debt obligations related to Grupo KCSM acquisition $83.3  $158.7 
Other debt obligations  0.2   0.2 
KCSR
        
Revolving credit facility, variable interest rate, 6.850% at December 31, 2006, due 2011  90.0   92.0 
Term loans, variable interest rate, 7.070% at December 31, 2006, due 2013  244.9   246.8 
91/2% senior notes, due 2008
  200.0   200.0 
71/2% senior notes, due 2009
  200.0   200.0 
Capital lease obligations, 8.00%, due serially to 2009  0.8   1.1 
Other debt obligations(iii)  12.7   32.0 
Tex-Mex
        
RRIF loan, 4.29%, due serially to 2030  49.2   21.7 
KCSM
        
Revolving credit facility, variable interest rate, due 2008     26.1 
Term loans, variable interest rate, 7.475% at December 31, 2006, due 2008  46.7   76.0 
101/4% senior notes, due 2007
  4.0   150.0 
121/2% senior notes, due 2012
  178.6   178.3 
93/8% senior notes, due 2012
  460.0   460.0 
75/8% senior notes, due 2013
  175.0    
Capital lease obligations, due serially to 2011  1.0   1.3 
Fair market adjustment related to purchase accounting  10.6   16.4 
         
Total  1,757.0   1,860.6 
Less: Debt due within one year(i)(ii)  92.8   116.3 
         
Long-term debt $1,664.2  $1,744.3 
         
  (i) Includes $1.9 million and $4.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of adjustments to reflect the fair value of the liabilities assumed in 2005.
 (ii) Includes current liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition.
(iii) In January 2006, $24.3 million of debt was repaid with locomotives through a non-cash transaction.


81

   2003

  2002

KCS

  $1.3  $1.3

KCSR

        

Borrowings pursuant to Amended KCS Credit Facility

        

Revolving Credit Facility, variable interest rate at December 31, 2003— 4.03%, due January 2006

   —     —  

Term Loans, variable interest rate at December 31, 2003 — 3.67%, due
June 2008

   98.5   149.2

7½% Senior Notes, due June 15, 2009

   200.0   200.0

9½% Senior Notes, due October 1, 2008

   200.0   200.0

Equipment Trust Certificates, 8.56% to 9.23%, due serially to
December 15, 2006

   17.1   23.5

Capital Lease Obligations, 7.15% to 9.00%, due serially to September 30, 2009

   1.9   2.5

Term Loans with State of Illinois, 3% to 5%, due serially to 2009

   2.8   3.3

OTHER

   1.8   2.8
   

  

Total

   523.4   582.6

Less: debt due within one year

   9.9   10.0
   

  

Long-term debt

  $513.5  $572.6
   

  


Kansas City Southern
Amended Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

KCS Credit Facility.Debt.
Debt Obligations Related to Grupo KCSM Acquisition.  In June 2002, in conjunctionconnection with the repaymentacquisition of Grupo KCSM and the settlement of the VAT/Put, the Company recorded a $110.0 million liability payable to TMM in 2005. The liability was non-interest bearing, therefore it was recorded at its present value based on a 5% discount rate. At December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a current liability of $69.3 million to be settled upon final resolution of the Vat/Put, and $31.6 million as a non-current liability to be settled in 5 years.
On March 13, 2006, in settlement of the $110.0 million obligation, KCS paid $35 million in cash, issued 1,494,469 shares of KCS common stock at the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of $23.4197, as determined by the acquisition agreement, and issued a $40 million five-year non-interest bearing note. At December 31, 2006 the Company recorded a non-current liability of $32.4 million which will accrete at 5% annually until April 1, 2010 when payment of $40.0 million will be due.
Also, as part of the acquisition in 2005, KCS issued escrow notes totaling $47.0 million which are subject to reduction for certain potential losses related to breaches of certain representations, warranties or covenants in the acquisition agreement by TMM. The escrow notes are due April 1, 2007, and accrue interest at a stated rate of 5.0%. The principal and interest is payable in cash or in stock (shares to be determined based on the VWAP 20 days prior to settlement) at the Company’s discretion. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company included $50.9 million as a current liability and $48.8 million as a non-current liability on the balance sheet, respectively.
At December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a $9.0 million one time incentive payment to JSIB, payable upon final resolution of the term loans under the Company’s former senior secured credit facility (“KCS Credit Facility”) using the net proceeds received from the offering of 7½% Senior Notes (see below),VAT/Put claim. On March 13, 2006, the Company amended and restated the KCSpaid $9.0 million in cash to JSIB.
KCSR Debt.
Revolving Credit Facility (“Amended KCSand Term Loans.  On March 30, 2004, KCSR entered into a credit agreement (the2004 Credit Facility”Agreement”). The Amended KCS Credit Facility provides KCSR with which was amended during 2004 and 2005 to result in a $150 million term loan (“Tranche B term loan”), which matures on June 12, 2008, and a $100$125 million revolving credit facility maturing on March 30, 2007, and a $250 million term loan facility maturing on March 30, 2008. The amended term loan facility bore interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“RevolvingLIBOR”) plus 150 basis points. The amended revolving credit facility bore interest at the LIBOR plus a spread based on the Company’s leverage ratio as defined in the 2004 Credit Facility”Agreement. As of December 31, 2005, advances under the revolving credit facility totaled $92.0 million and the term loan’s balance was $246.8 million. Revolver availability as of December 31, 2005 was $33.0 million.
On April 28, 2006, KCS, KCSR and the other subsidiary guarantors named therein entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “2006 Credit Agreement”), which matures on January 11, 2006. Lettersin an aggregate amount of $371.1 million with The Bank of Nova Scotia and other lenders named in the 2006 Credit Agreement. Proceeds from the 2006 Credit Agreement were used to refinance the 2004 Credit Agreement. The 2006 Credit Agreement consists of (a) a $125.0 million revolving credit facility with a letter of credit are also availablesublimit of $25.0 million and swing line advances of up to $15.0 million, and (b) a $246.1 million term loan facility. The revolving credit facility bears interest at either LIBOR, or an alternate base rate, plus a spread based on the Company’s leverage ratio as defined in the 2006 Credit Agreement. The term loan facility bears interest at either LIBOR plus 175 basis points or the alternative base rate plus 75 basis points. The maturity date for the revolving credit facility is April 28, 2011 and the maturity date of the term loan facility is April 28, 2013. The 2006 Credit Agreement contains covenants that restrict or prohibit certain actions, including, but not limited to, KCS’ ability to incur debt, create or suffer to exist liens, make prepayment of particular debt, pay dividends, make investments, engage in transactions with stockholders and affiliates, issue capital stock, sell certain assets, and engage in mergers and consolidations or in sale-leaseback transactions. In addition, KCS must meet certain consolidated interest coverage and leverage ratios. Failure to maintain compliance with the


82


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

covenants could constitute a default which could accelerate the payment of any outstanding amounts under the Revolving2006 Credit Facility up to a limit of $15 million. The proceeds from future borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital and for general corporate purposes. The letters of credit may be used for general corporate purposes.Agreement. Borrowings under the Amended KCS Credit FacilityAgreement are secured by substantially all of the Company’s domestic assets and are guaranteed by the majority of its domestic subsidiaries.

The Tranche B term loan As of December 31, 2006, advances under the revolving credit facility totaled $90.0 million and the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or an alternate base rate, as the Company shall select, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for the Tranche B term loan is 2% for LIBOR borrowings and 1% for alternate base rate borrowings. The applicable margin for the Revolving Credit Facility is based on the Company’s leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the Company’s total debt to consolidated EBITDA earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding the undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates for the prior four fiscal quarters). Based on the Company’s leverage ratioloans’ balance was $244.9 million. Revolver availability as of December 31, 2003, the applicable margin2006 was 2.25% per annum for LIBOR borrowings and 1.25% per annum for alternate base rate borrowings.

The Amended$35.0 million.

On January 31, 2007, KCS Credit Facility also requires the paymentprovided written notice to the lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement of certain representation and other defaults under the 2006 Credit Agreement arising from the potential defaults which existed under the KCSR indentures governing the Notes as described below. These defaults limited KCSR’s access to the revolving credit facility. In its notice of default, the Company also requested that the lenders waive these defaults. On February 5, 2007 the Company received a commitment feewaiver of 0.50% per annum on the average daily, unused amountsuch defaults from all of the Revolving Credit Facility. Additionally, a fee equal to a per annum rate of 0.25% plus the applicable margin for LIBOR priced borrowingslenders under the Revolving2006 Credit Facility will be paid on any letter of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Amended KCS Credit Facility contains certain provisions, covenants and restrictions customary for this type of debt and for borrowers with a similar credit rating. These provisions include, among others, restrictions on the Company’s ability and its subsidiaries ability to (1) incur additional debt or liens; (2) enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (3) merge or consolidate with another entity; (4) sell assets; (5) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (6) make investments, loans, advances, guarantees or acquisitions; (7) make certain restricted payments, including dividends, or make certain payments on other indebtedness; and (8) make capital expenditures. In addition, the Company is required to comply with certain financial ratios, including minimum interest expense coverage and leverage ratios. The Amended KCS Credit Facility also contains certain customary events of default. These covenants, along with other provisions, could restrict maximum utilization of the Revolving Credit Facility.

Refinancing of Amended KCS Credit Facility. On March 1, 2004, the Company repaid approximately $38.5 million of term debt (“Term B Loan”) under the Amended KCS Credit Facility using cash on-hand. After consideration of this repayment, the outstanding balance under the Term B Loan was $60 million.

Agreement. The Company is currently not in the process of refinancing the Amended KCS Credit Facility, including the Revolving Credit Facility. Under the proposed termsdefault of the new senior secured credit facility (“2004 KCS2006 Credit Facility”),Agreement and has access to the Company expects to borrow $150 million under a new term loan due March 2008 (“2004 Term B Loan”). Additionally, the 2004 KCS Credit Facility provides for a new revolving credit facility, which expires in March 2007, with a maximum borrowing amountfacility.

Senior Notes.  KCSR has outstanding $200.0 million of $100 million (“2004 Revolving Credit Facility”). The Company does not anticipate any borrowing under91/2% senior unsecured notes issued during the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2004. The Company has received firm commitment letters from various banks and institutional investors committing to fully fund the new loans and agreeing to the term sheet of the 2004 KCS Credit Facility. The commitments are subject only to proper documentation of the new facility. KCS management expects to close this refinancing transaction prior to March 31, 2004. If, however, the 2004 KCS Credit Facility is not consummated on or prior to March 31, 2004, the Company may be in technical default of certain of its existing financial covenants under the Amended KCS Credit Facility.

As a result of the refinancing transaction described above, the Company expects to report a charge to earnings in the firstthird quarter of 2004 of approximately $4 million related to the write-off of existing deferred costs.

7½% Senior Notes. In June 2002, KCSR issued $2002000 and due October 1, 2008, and $200.0 million of 71/2% senior unsecured notes issued in June of 2002 and due June 15, 2009 (“7½% Notes”). Net proceeds from the offering of $195.8 million, together with cash, were used to repay term debt under the KCS Credit Facility and certain other secured indebtedness of the Company.12, 2009. These registeredsenior unsecured notes bear interest at a fixed annual interest rate to bewhich is paid semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 and are due June 15, 2009.semi-annually. These registeredsenior notes are general unsecured obligations of KCSR but are guaranteed by the CompanyKCS and certain of its domestic subsidiaries.

Consent Solicitation.  On January 29, 2007, the Company commenced a consent solicitation to amend the indentures under which KCSR’s 91/2% Senior Notes due 2008 (the “91/2% Notes”) and 71/2% Senior Notes due 2009 (the “71/2% Notes” and together with the 91/2% Notes, the “Notes”) were issued. The purpose of the consent solicitation was to (i) resolve an inconsistency in the inclusion of certain expenses, but not the income, of restricted subsidiaries in the calculation of the consolidated coverage ratio under the indentures, (ii) amend the definition of refinancing indebtedness to allow the inclusion of certain related premiums, interest, fees and containexpenses in permitted refinancing indebtedness and (iii) obtain waivers of any defaults arising from certain actions taken in the absence of such proposed amendments. On February 5, 2007, the Company obtained the requisite consents from the holders of each series of Notes to amend their respective indentures as described above and executed supplemental indentures containing such amendments and waivers.
Tex-Mex Debt.
RRIF Loan Agreement.  On June 28, 2005, Tex-Mex entered into an agreement with Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) to borrow $50 million to be used for infrastructure improvements which are expected to increase efficiency and capacity in order to accommodate growing freight rail traffic related to the NAFTA corridor. At December 31, 2005, Tex-Mex had borrowed a net amount of $21.7 million under the loan agreement. Tex-Mex drew down the remaining $28.2 million during 2006. The note bears interest at 4.29% annually and the principal balance amortizes quarterly with a final maturity of July 13, 2030. The loan was made under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (“RRIF”) Program administered by the FRA. The loan is guaranteed by Mexrail, which has issued a Pledge Agreement in favor of the lender equal to the gross revenues earned by Mexrail on per-car fees on traffic crossing the International Rail Bridge in Laredo, Texas.
On February 16, 2007, Tex-Mex and the FRA entered into amendment No. 1 and waiver No. 1 to the loan agreement, the purpose of which was to eliminate the obligation of Tex-Mex to provide audited annual financial statements to the FRA and to waive Tex-Mex’s failure to do so since entering into the loan agreement. To induce the FRA to agree to such amendment and waiver, the Company has agreed to provide the FRA with its audited annual financial statements and unaudited quarterly statements and has also agreed to guaranty the scheduled principal payment installments due to the FRA from Tex-Mex under the loan agreement on a rolling five-year basis.


83


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

KCSM Debt.
Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans.  On October 24, 2005, KCSM entered into a credit agreement (the “2005 KCSM Credit Agreement”) in an aggregate amount of $106.0 million, with a maturity of October 28, 2008. The 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement consisted of a $30.0 million revolving credit facility and a $76.0 million term loan facility secured by the locomotives and rail cars owned by KCSM’s subsidiary, Arrendadora. For dollar loans the facilities bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread based on KCSM’s leverage ratio as defined under the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement. For peso loans the facilities bear interest at the TIIE rate plus a spread based on KCSM’s leverage ratio. Proceeds from the facilities were used primarily to pay down debt and for general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2005, advances under the revolving credit facility totaled $26.1 million, with $3.9 million remaining available under the facility. At December 31, 2006 there were no advances outstanding under the revolving credit facility and KCSM had $30.0 million of availability. On November 21, 2006, KCSM paid down $29.0 million of the term loan facility from the proceeds of its 75/8% senior notes offering. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the term loans’ balance was $46.7 million and $76.0 million, respectively. The 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement contains covenants and restrictions similar to those in KCSR’s 2006 Credit Agreement.
On April 7, 2006, KCSM entered into an amendment and waiver (“Amendment and Waiver”) related to the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement. The 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement was amended to (i) exclude certain payment obligations accrued under two locomotive maintenance agreements and under a track maintenance rehabilitation agreement from the definition of Indebtedness, (ii) eliminate certain minimum and multiple borrowing thresholds for peso borrowings under the revolving credit facility and (iii) eliminate the reporting requirement to provide unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fourth fiscal quarter. The Amendment and Waiver also waived certain reporting requirements, including the requirement of KCSM to provide audited consolidated financial statements 90 days after the end of the 2005 fiscal year, provided such reports were delivered by April 30, 2006, and compliance with the Consolidated Leverage Ratio obligations of Section 7.1(c) of the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement for the four quarters ending December 31, 2005, if compliance therewith was calculated without giving effect to the amendment to the definition of “Indebtedness” in the Amendment and Waiver,providedthat KCSM was in compliance therewith after giving effect to the Amendment and Waiver. KCSM is not currently in default of the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement and currently has access to the revolving credit facility.
101/4% Senior Notes.  As of December 31, 2005, KCSM had outstanding $150.0 million of 101/4% unsecured senior notes issued in 1997 and due June 15, 2007 (the “KCSM 2007 Senior Notes”). On October 23, 2006, pursuant to an offer to purchase dated such date, KCSM commenced a cash tender offer and consent solicitation for any and all outstanding $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the KCSM 2007 Senior Notes. The consent solicitation expired on November 3, 2006. KCSM received consents in connection with the tender offer and consent solicitation from holders of over 97% of the KCSM 2007 Senior Notes to amend the indenture under which the KCSM 2007 Senior Notes were issued (the “2007 Indenture”), to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants included in the 2007 Indenture. The supplemental indenture relating to the KCSM 2007 Senior Notes containing the proposed changes (the “2007 Supplemental Indenture”) became effective on November 21, 2006. The tender offer expired at midnight, New York City time, on November 20, 2006 and KCSM purchased tendered notes on November 21, 2006, in accordance with the terms of the tender offer from proceeds received through the issuance of new 75/8% senior unsecured notes. On December 31, 2006, there was $4.0 million of KCSM 2007 Senior Notes outstanding.
121/2% Senior Notes.  KCSM has outstanding $178.6 million of 121/2% senior unsecured notes issued in June 2002 and due June 15, 2012, which are redeemable at any time in the event of certain changes in Mexican tax law and at KCSM’s option after June 14, 2007, subject to certain limitations, at the following redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount), plus any unpaid interest: 2007 — 106.250%, 2008 — 104.167%, 2009 — 102.083% and thereafter — 100.000%.


84


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

93/8% Senior Notes.  KCSM has outstanding $460.0 million of 93/8% senior unsecured notes issued on April 19, 2005, and due May 1, 2012. The notes are redeemable at KCSM’s option at the following redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount), plus any unpaid interest: 2009 — 104.688%, 2010 — 102.344% and thereafter — 100.000%. Subject to certain conditions, up to 35% of the principal of the notes is redeemable prior to May 1, 2008. In addition, the notes are redeemable, in whole but not in part, at KCSM’s option at their principal amount in the event of certain changes in the Mexican withholding tax rate.
75/8% Senior Notes.  On November 21, 2006, KCSM issued $175.0 million of new 75/8% senior unsecured notes due December 1, 2013. Proceeds from the issuance were used to purchase $146.0 million of tendered KCSM 2007 Senior Notes and repay $29.0 million of term loans under the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement. The notes are redeemable at KCSM’s option after November 30, 2010, subject to certain limitations, at the following redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount), plus any unpaid interest: 2010 — 103.813%, 2011 — 101.906% and 2012 — 100.000%. Subject to certain conditions, up to 35% of the principal of the notes is redeemable prior to December 1, 2009. In addition, the notes are redeemable, in whole but not in part, at KCSM’s option at their principal amount in the event of certain changes in the Mexican withholding tax rate.
All of KCSM’s senior notes above are denominated in dollars and are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations, rank pari passu in right of payment with KCSM’s existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated obligations, are senior in right of payment to KCSM’s future subordinated indebtedness, and other than the 101/4% Senior Notes, are not guaranteed by Grupo KCSM.
Other Debt Provisions.
Other Agreements, Guarantees, Provisions and Restrictions.  The Company has debt agreements customary for this typethese types of debt instrumentinstruments and for borrowers with similar credit ratings.

9½% Senior Notes. During the third quarter of 2000, KCSR completed a $200 million offering of 8-year senior unsecured notes (“9½% Notes”). Net proceeds from this offering of $196.5 million were used to refinance term debt and reduce commitments under the KCS Credit Facility. The refinanced debt was scheduled to mature on January 11, 2001. These registered notes bear a fixed annual interest rate and are due on October 1, 2008. These registered notes are general unsecured obligations of KCSR, are guaranteed by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and contain certain covenants and restrictions customary for this type of debt instrument and for borrowers with similar credit ratings.

Debt issuance costs related to indebtedness have been deferred and are being amortized over the respective term of the loans.

Leases and Debt Maturities. The Company and its subsidiaries lease transportation equipment, as well as office and other operating facilities under various capital and operating leases. Rental expenses under operating leases were $57.2 million, $55.0 million and $56.8 million for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Minimum annual payments and present value thereof under existing capital leases, other debt maturities, and minimum annual rental commitments under noncancellable operating leases are as follows(dollars in millions):

      Capital Leases

     Operating Leases

   

Long-

Term
Debt


  Minimum
Lease
Payments


  Less
Interest


  Net
Present
Value


  Total
Debt


  Southern
Capital


  Third
Party


  Total

2004

  $9.5  $0.6  $0.2  $0.4  $9.9  $29.2  $27.0  $56.2

2005

   8.7   0.5   0.1   0.4   9.1   25.5   22.4   47.9

2006

   7.6   0.4   0.1   0.3   7.9   22.3   21.3   43.6

2007

   48.0   0.3   —     0.3   48.3   18.5   19.1   37.6

2008

   246.9   0.3   —     0.3   247.2   18.5   15.4   33.9

Later years

   200.8   0.2   —     0.2   201.0   138.0   45.6   183.6
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total

  $521.5  $2.3  $0.4  $1.9  $523.4  $252.0  $150.8  $402.8
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

KCSR Indebtedness. KCSR has purchased locomotives and rolling stock under equipment trust certificates and capitalized lease obligations. The equipment, which has been pledged as collateral for the related indebtedness, has an original cost of $134.7 million and a net book value of $65.9 million.

Other Agreements, Guarantees, Provisions and Restrictions. The Company has debt agreementsratings containing restrictions on subsidiary indebtedness, advances and transfers of assets, and sale and leaseback transactions, as well as requiring compliance with various financial covenants. At December 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the provisions and restrictions of these agreements. Because of certain financial covenants contained in the debt agreements, however, maximum utilization of the Company’s available line of credit may be restricted.

Change in Control Provisions.  Certain loan agreements and debt instruments entered into or guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries provide for default in the event of a specified change in control of the Company or particular subsidiaries of the Company.


85

Note 6. Income Taxes


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Leases and Debt Maturities.
The Company leases transportation equipment, as well as office and other operating facilities under various capital and operating leases. Rental expenses under operating leases were $136.8 million, $103.0 million, and $57.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Contingent rentals and sublease rentals were not significant. Minimum annual payments and present value thereof under existing capital leases, other debt maturities and minimum annual rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases follow(in millions):
                                 
     Capital Leases             
  Long-
  Minimum
     Net
     Operating Leases 
  Term
  Lease
  Less
  Present
  Total
  Southern
  Third
    
Years
 Debt  Payments  Interest  Value  Debt  Capital  Party  Total 
 
2007(i) $92.2  $0.7  $0.1  $0.6  $92.8  $18.8  $104.8  $123.6 
2008  230.7   0.7   0.1   0.6   231.3   19.2   90.4   109.6 
2009  204.1   0.5      0.5   204.6   17.0   78.9   95.9 
2010  3.9   0.1      0.1   4.0   18.0   73.6   91.6 
2011  126.4            126.4   13.0   63.3   76.3 
Thereafter(ii)  1,097.9            1,097.9   94.8   366.8   461.6 
                                 
Total $1,755.2  $2.0  $0.2  $1.8  $1,757.0  $180.8  $777.8  $958.6 
                                 
(i)Includes current liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition.
(ii)Includes long-term liability related to Grupo KCSM acquisition.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into long-term contractual requirements for future goods and services needed for the operations of the business. Such commitments are not in excess of expected requirements and are not reasonably likely to result in performance penalties or payments that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity.
Note 7.  Income Taxes
Current income tax expense represents the amounts expected to be reported on the Company’s income tax return, and deferred tax expense or benefit represents the change in net deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances are used to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount considered likely to be realized.


86


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Tax Expense.Income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following components(in millions):

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Current

             

Federal

  $—    $(15.3) $(26.6)

State and local

   0.3   0.4   (1.1)

Foreign withholding taxes

   —     —     0.1 
   


 


 


Total current

   0.3   (14.9)  (27.6)

Deferred

             

Federal

   (4.1)  20.8   29.5 

State and local

   1.0   1.0   0.9 
   


 


 


Total deferred

   (3.1)  21.8   30.4 
   


 


 


Total income tax provision (benefit)

  $(2.8) $6.9  $2.8 
   


 


 


             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Current:
            
Federal $4.0  $11.2  $(12.4)
State and local  0.4   (1.3)  0.1 
Foreign     0.3    
             
Total current  4.4   10.2   (12.3)
             
Deferred:
            
Federal  12.7   (17.8)  33.8 
State and local  7.2   1.4   2.1 
Foreign  21.1   (0.9)   
             
Total deferred  41.0   (17.3)  35.9 
             
Total income tax expense (benefit) $45.4  $(7.1) $23.6 
             
The federaltax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and state deferred tax liabilities (assets)follow at December 31 are as follows(in millions):
         
  2006  2005 
 
Liabilities:
        
Depreciation $571.2  $565.2 
Investments  13.4   16.2 
Concession rights  256.7   277.5 
Other, net  5.6   5.6 
         
Gross deferred tax liabilities  846.9   864.5 
         
Assets:
        
Loss carryovers  (480.7)  (491.3)
Book reserves not currently deductible for tax  (48.3)  (57.4)
Inventories and provisions  (33.1)  (70.9)
Vacation accrual  (3.8)  (3.5)
Other, net  (9.8)  (3.9)
         
Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowance  (575.7)  (627.0)
Valuation allowance on loss carryovers  9.8   9.5 
         
Gross deferred tax assets  (565.9)  (617.5)
         
Net deferred tax liability $281.0  $247.0 
         


87

   2003

  2002

 

Liabilities:

         

Depreciation

  $449.2  $415.4 

Other, net

   2.6   —   
   


 


Gross deferred tax liabilities

   451.8   415.4 
   


 


Assets:

         

NOL carryovers

   (23.9)  (8.8)

Book reserves not currently deductible for tax

   (26.8)  (27.2)

Vacation accrual

   (2.7)  (2.8)

Investments

   (12.6)  (1.2)

Other, net

   (4.6)  (1.3)
   


 


Gross deferred tax assets

   (70.6)  (41.3)
   


 


Net deferred tax liability

  $381.2  $374.1 
   


 


Based upon the Company’s history of operating income and its expectations for the future, management has determined that operating income of the Company will, more likely than not, be sufficient


Kansas City Southern
Notes to realize fully the gross deferred tax assets set forth above.

Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Tax Rates.  Differences between the Company’s effective income tax rates and the U.S. federal income tax statutory rates of 35% are as followsfollow(in millions):

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Income tax provision using the Statutory rate in effect

  $0.2  $21.4  $11.9 

Tax effect of

             

Earnings of equity investees

   (4.3)  (15.0)  (9.4)

Other, net

   0.5   (0.9)  0.4 
   


 


 


Federal income tax provision (benefit)

   (3.6)  5.5   2.9 

State and local income tax provision (benefit)

   0.8   1.4   (0.2)

Foreign withholding taxes

   —     —     0.1 
   


 


 


Total tax expense (benefit)

  $(2.8) $6.9  $2.8 
   


 


 


Effective tax rate

   (600.7)%  11.3%  8.3%
   


 


 


             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Income tax provision using the Statutory rate in effect $54.1  $26.7  $16.8 
Tax effect of:            
Earnings (losses) of equity investees  (0.6)  0.3   1.8 
State and local income tax provision  3.9   0.1   2.8 
Tax credits  (1.8)  (2.4)   
Change in tax contingency  (2.8)      
Foreign exchange, tax rate and indexation adjustments  (4.9)  4.3    
Write off of deferred profit sharing     10.1    
VAT/Put settlement     (42.3)   
Difference between U.S. and foreign tax rate  (3.1)  (3.9)   
Foreign asset tax     0.3    
Other, net(i)  0.6   (0.3)  2.2 
             
Income tax expense (benefit) $45.4  $(7.1) $23.6 
             
Effective tax rate  29.4%  (9.3)%  49.1%
(i)2004 includes certain adjustments of prior year provision estimates resulting in a $1.1 million increase in tax expense.
Difference Attributable to Grupo TFMKCSM Investment.At December 31, 2003,2006, the Company’s book basis exceeded the tax basis of its investment in Grupo TFMKCSM by $92.1$563 million. The Company has not provided a deferred income tax liability for the income taxes, if any, which might become payable on the realization of this basis difference because the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest in Grupo TFMKCSM the financial accounting earnings which gave rise to the basis differential. Moreover, the Company has no other plans to realize this basis differential by a sale of its investment in Grupo TFM.KCSM. If the Company were to realize this basis difference in the future by a receipt of dividends or the sale of its interest in Grupo TFM,KCSM, as of December 31, 20032006, the Company would incur gross federal income taxes of $32.2$197.1 million, which might be partially or fully offset by Mexican income taxes and could be availabletaxes.
Prior to reduce federalthe acquisition of a controlling interest in Grupo KCSM on April 1, 2005, Grupo KCSM provided deferred income taxes at such time.

Tax Carryovers.for the difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases of its assets and liabilities. KCS recorded its proportionate share of these income taxes through its equity in Grupo KCSM’s earnings. Since April 1, 2005, Grupo KCSM income taxes are reflected in the consolidated results. Although KCSM has generated book profits, it has incurred tax losses due primarily to the accelerated tax amortization of the Concession rights. The remaining amount of federalCompany has recognized a deferred income tax asset for the resulting net operating loss (NOL) carryover generated by MidSouthcarryforwards. Management anticipates that such net operating loss carryforwards will be realized given the expiration dates (through the year 2046) of the loss carryforwards, as well as the fact that KCSM expects to generate taxable income in the future. Management’s tax projections take into consideration certain assumptions, some of which are under their control and Gateway Western priorothers which are not. Key assumptions include inflation rates, currency fluctuations and future revenue growth. If management’s assumptions are not correct, a valuation allowance may have to acquisitionbe recognized on the deferred tax asset.

As described in Note 4, on September 12, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries, KCSM and Grupo KCSM, along with TMM, entered into a settlement agreement with the Mexican government, resolving the controversies and disputes between the companies and the Mexican government concerning the payment of a value added tax (“VAT”) refund to KCSM and the obligation (“Put”) to purchase the remaining shares of


88


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

KCSM owned by the Mexican government (the “VAT/Put Settlement”). All Mexican income taxes on the VAT were paid as part of the VAT/Put Settlement. The Company believes, based upon opinions of outside legal counsel and other factors, that the VAT/Put Settlement is approximately $8.7 million atnot taxable to KCS for U.S. income tax purposes.
Tax Carryovers.  In the year ended December 31, 2003 with expiration dates beginning in 2008. The use of preacquisition net operating losses and tax credit carryovers is subject to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company does not anticipate that these limitations will affect utilization of the carryover prior to its expiration.

Additionally, in 2003, 2002 and 2001,2005, the Company generated both U.S. federal and state NOL’s.net operating losses. The 2002 and 2001 federal NOL’s werelosses are carried back to 2000 and 1999 respectively, whereas the state NOL’s have been carried forward. Theforward 20 years for federal and state NOL’s created in 2003 will be carried forward upfrom 5 to 20 years. years for state.

Both the federal and state NOL’sloss carryovers are analyzed each year to determine the likelihood of realization. The U.S. federal loss carryover at December 31, 2006, is $137.8 million and will expire beginning in 2008. The Company believes the amount recognizedfederal loss carryover will be realized.
The state loss carryovers arise from both combined and separately filed tax filings from as early as 1991. The loss carryovers may expire as early as December 31, 2007, and as late as December 31, 2026. The state loss carryover at December 31, 2006, is more likely than not to$527.9 million ($16.0 million of tax), of which it is expected that $203.6 million ($6.2 million of tax) will be realized.

Tax Examinations. Management believes that state loss carryovers, net of the valuation allowance, will be ultimately realized.

The Mexico federal loss carryovers at December 31, 2006, are $1.5 billion (Mexican pesos of Ps16.2 billion) and will expire as early as 2015 and as late as 2046. The Company believes the Mexican loss carryovers will be realized.
Internal Revenue Service Reviews.  The IRS is currently in the process of examiningreviewing the consolidated federal income tax returns for the years 1997 through 1999. The IRS2002. A current income tax liability has recently concluded its examination ofbeen accrued for the 1993 to 1996 tax years and the Company expects to receive a refund related to this examination in late 2004 or early 2005.anticipated outcome. The Company alsobelieves that adequate provision has a refund requestbeen made for the 1990-1992 tax years related to a single issueany adjustment (taxes and expects to receive a refund in 2004.interest) that may be assessed for all open years. The federal statute of limitations has closed for years prior to 1993. In addition, other taxing authorities are currently examining the years 1998 through 2002. The Company believes it has recorded adequate estimated liabilities for any likely additional taxes. Since most of these asserted tax deficiencies represent temporary differences, subsequent payments of taxes will not require additional charges to income tax expense. Accruals have been made for interest (net of tax benefit) for estimated settlement of the proposed tax assessments. Management believes that final settlement of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

1997.

Note 7. Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ Equity.
Note 8.  Stockholders’ Equity

Information regarding the Company’s capital stock at December 31 2003 and 2002 follows:

   Shares
Authorized


  Shares
Issued


$25 Par, 4% noncumulative, Preferred stock

  840,000  649,736

$1 Par, Preferred stock

  2,000,000  None

$1 Par, Series A, Preferred stock

  150,000  None

$1 Par, Series B convertible, Preferred stock

  1,000,000  None

$1 Par, Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock

  400,000  400,000

$.01 Par, Common stock

  400,000,000  73,369,116

             
  Shares
       
  Authorized
  Shares Issued 
  2006 and 2005  2006  2005 
 
$25 par, 4% noncumulative, preferred stock  840,000   649,736   649,736 
$1 par, preferred stock  2,000,000       
$1 par, series A, preferred stock  150,000       
$1 par, series B convertible, preferred stock  1,000,000       
$1 par, series C redeemable cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock  400,000   400,000   400,000 
$1 par, series D cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock  210,000   210,000   210,000 
$.01 par, common stock  400,000,000   92,863,585   91,369,116 
Shares outstanding at December 31:
         
  2006  2005 
 
$25 par, 4% noncumulative, preferred stock  242,170   242,170 
$1 par, series C redeemable cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock  400,000   400,000 
$1 par, series D cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock  210,000   210,000 
$.01 par, common stock  75,920,333   73,412,081 


89

   2003

  2002

$25 Par, 4% noncumulative, Preferred stock

  242,170  242,170

$1 Par, Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock

  400,000  —  

$.01 Par, Common stock

  62,175,621  61,103,015


Stock Option Plans. The Kansas City Southern 1991 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan (as amended and restated effective November 7, 2002) provides for the granting of options
Notes to purchase up to 16.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock by officers and other designated employees. Options have been granted under this plan at 100% of the average market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and generally may not be exercised sooner than one year or longer than ten years following the date of the grant, except that options outstanding with limited rights (“LRs”) or limited stock appreciation rights (“LSARs”), become immediately exercisable upon certain defined circumstances constituting a change in control of the Company. The plan includes provisions for stock appreciation rights, LRs and LSARs. All outstanding options include LSARs, except for options granted to non-employee Directors prior to 1999.Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

For purposes of computing the pro forma effects of option grants under the fair value accounting method prescribed by SFAS 123, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a version of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following assumptions were used for the various grants depending on the date of grant, nature of vesting and term of option:

   2003

  2002

  2001

Dividend Yield

  0%  0%  0%

Expected Volatility

  35% to 41%  35% to 38%  35% to 40%

Risk-free Interest Rate

  1.68% to 2.30%  2.16% to 3.88%  2.98% to 4.84%

Expected Life

  3 years  3 years  3 years

Summary of Company’s Stock Option Plans. A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and changes during the years then ended is presented below.

   2003

  2002

  2001

   Shares

  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


  Shares

  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


  Shares

  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


Outstanding at January 1

  4,845,226  $6.35  5,821,315  $5.44  6,862,036  $4.92

Exercised

  (769,782)  4.60  (1,265,418)  4.87  (1,128,838)  3.71

Canceled/Expired

  (114,582)  10.67  (144,388)  6.15  (105,537)  4.79

Granted

  652,001   12.15  433,717   14.25  193,654   13.37
   

 

  

 

  

 

Outstanding at December 31

  4,612,863  $7.36  4,845,226  $6.35  5,821,315  $5.44
   

 

  

 

  

 

Exercisable at December 31

  3,807,886  $6.30  3,784,417  $5.63  4,803,942  $5.13

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period

     $4.86     $3.97     $4.18

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003:

  OUTSTANDING

 EXERCISABLE

Range of
Exercise
Prices


 Shares
Outstanding


 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life


  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


 Shares
Exercisable


 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price


  $.20 –1 122,752 1.6 years $0.88 122,752 $0.88
      1 – 2 127,255 3.4   1.34 127,255  1.34
      2 – 4 89,799 4.9   2.75 89,799  2.75
      4 – 7 3,000,785 6.5   5.77 3,000,785  5.77
    7 – 10 95,072 6.7   8.23 95,072  8.23
  10 – 13 85,000 7.5   12.62 85,000  12.62
  13 – 17 1,092,200 8.8   13.07 287,223  15.02
  
       
   
  .20 –17 4,612,863 6.8  $7.36 3,807,886 $6.30
  
       
   

At December 31, 2003, shares available for future grants under the stock option plan were 1,261,987.

Stock Purchase Plan. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), established in 1977, provides substantially all full-time employees of the Company, certain subsidiaries and certain other affiliated entities, with the right to subscribe to an aggregate of 11.4 million shares of common stock. The purchase price for shares under any stock offering is to be 85% of the average market price on either the exercise date or the offering date, whichever is lower, but in no event less than the par value of the shares.

The following table summarizes activity related to the various ESPP offerings:

   Date
Initiated


  Shares
Subscribed


  Price

  Shares
Issued


  Date Issued

  Received
from
Employees*


                  (in millions)

Fifteenth Offering

  2003  242,589  $11.28  —    —    $—  

Fourteenth Offering

  2002  248,379  $9.27–$12.29  197,734  2003/2004   2.4

Thirteenth Offering

  2001  402,902  $10.24–$10.57  338,004  2002/2003   3.5

*Represents amounts received from employees through payroll deductions for share purchases under applicable offering.

At December 31, 2003, there were approximately 4.3 million shares available for future ESPP offerings.

For purposes of computing the pro forma effects of employees’ purchase rights under the fair value accounting method prescribed by SFAS 123, the fair value of the offerings under the ESPP is estimated on the date of grant using a version of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used for the Fifteenth, Fourteenth, and Thirteenth Offerings, respectively: i) dividend yield of 0.00%, 0.00% and 0.00%; ii) expected volatility of 35%, 36%, and 38%, iii) risk-free interest rate of 1.26%, 2.22%, and 2.98% ; and iv) expected life of one year. The weighted-average fair value of purchase rights granted under the Fifteenth, Fourteenth and Thirteenth Offerings of the ESPP were $2.95, $3.00, and $3.00, respectively.

Treasury Stock.  Shares of common stock in Treasury at December 31, 2003 totaled 11,193,495 compared with 12,266,101 at December 31, 2002 and 14,125,949 at December 31, 2001. The Company issued shares of common stock from Treasury—1,072,606 in 2003, 1,859,848 in 2002, and 1,095,895 in 2001—to fund the exercise of options and subscriptions under various employee stock option and purchase plans. Shares repurchased during 2003, 2002 and 2001 were not material.

related activity follow:

             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Balance at beginning of year  17,957,035   10,098,912   11,193,495 
Shares purchased     9,000,000    
Shares issued to fund stock option exercises  (617,107)  (528,758)  (889,803)
Employee stock purchase plan shares issued  (109,644)  (205,928)  (197,780)
Nonvested shares issued  (428,143)  (442,632)  (7,000)
Nonvested shares forfeited  141,111   35,441    
             
Balance at end of year  16,943,252   17,957,035   10,098,912 
             
Series C Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock.  On May 5, 2003, the Company completed the sale of $200 million of Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (“ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock”) with a liquidation preference of $500 per share in a private offering. The Convertible Preferred Stock offering was made only by means of an offering memorandum pursuant to Rule 144A. Dividends on the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock are cumulative and are payable quarterly at an annual rate of 4.25% of the liquidation preference, when, as and if declared by the Company’s boardBoard of directors. Accumulated unpaid dividends will cumulate dividends at the same rate as dividends cumulate on the Convertible Preferred Stock.Directors. Each share of the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock will beis convertible under certain conditions, and subject to adjustment under certain conditions, into 33.4728 shares of the Company’s common stock. On or afterAfter May 20,19, 2008, the Company will have the option tomay redeem any or all of the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock, subject to certain conditions. Under certain circumstances, at the option of the holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock, theThe Company may be required to purchase shares ofredeem the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock from the holders. The Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemableholders at thetheir option of a holder only in the event of a “fundamental change,” which is defined as “any transaction or event (whether by means of an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer, consolidation, merger, combination, reclassification, recapitalization or otherwise) in connection with which all orif substantially all of the Company’s common stock is exchanged for or converted into acquired for or constitutes solely the right to receive common stock that is not listed on a United StatesU.S. national securities exchange or approved for quotation on the NasdaqNASDAQ National Market or similar system.(a “fundamental change”). The practical effect of this provision is to limit the Company’s ability to eliminate a holder’s ability to convert the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock into common shares of a publicly traded securitycompany through a merger or consolidation transaction. In no other circumstances is the Company potentially obligated to redeem the Convertible Preferred Stock for cash. Accordingly, since the Company is in a position to control whether the Company experiences a “fundamentalfundamental change, the ConvertibleSeries C Preferred Stock is classified as permanent equity capital.

A portion

Series D Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock.  On December 9, 2005, KCS completed the sale and issuance of 210,000 shares of its 5.125% Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Series D Preferred Stock”). Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into 33.3333 shares of KCS common stock, subject to certain adjustments. Dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock are cumulative and payable quarterly in any combination of cash and KCS common stock, as declared by the KCS Board of Directors, at the rate of 5.125% per annum of the netliquidation preference of $1,000. The Series D Preferred Stock ranks senior to the common stock and to each class or series of KCS capital stock that has terms that provide that such class or series will rank junior to the Series D Preferred Stock. After February 19, 2011, KCS may convert all of the Series D Preferred Stock into common stock at the then prevailing conversion rate, but only if the closing sale price of the common stock multiplied by the conversion rate then in effect equals or exceeds 130% of the liquidation preference for 20 trading days during any consecutive 30 trading day period, and if KCS has paid all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the dividend payment date immediately preceding the forced conversion date.
Upon certain designated events (a “fundamental change”), holders of the Series D Preferred Stock may, subject to legally available funds, require KCS to redeem any or all of the shares, which KCS may pay in either cash, in shares of KCS stock or any combination thereof, at KCS’ option. Since KCS has the ability in this event to pay the redemption price in KCS common stock (which is not required to be registered), the Series D Preferred Stock is classified as permanent equity capital. The number of shares to be issued would be based upon the value of KCS common stock at that time but in no event will the number of shares issued on the occurrence of a fundamental change exceed 52.5 million shares.
On December 12, 2005, the Company used substantially all of the proceeds from the ConvertibleSeries D Preferred Stock has been usedoffering to reduce debt. The remainderrepurchase 9,000,000 shares of the net proceeds are expectedKCS common stock issued to be usedTMM in April 2005 in


90


Kansas City Southern
Notes to pay a portion of the purchase price for the proposed acquisition of a controlling interest of Grupo TFM or to further reduce debt. IfConsolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

connection with the acquisition of KCSM. All of the controlling interest9,000,000 shares were purchased at a price of Grupo TFM were$22.25 per share or $200.3 million. The Company does not to be completed,have a formal program for the repurchase of any additional shares of its equity securities.
Dividend Restrictions.  Following completion of the preparation of the 2005 financial statements of KCS, the Company would explore alternative usesdetermined that its Consolidated Coverage Ratio (as defined in the indentures for KCSR’s 71/2% senior notes and 91/2% senior notes) was less than 2.0:1. As a result, pursuant to the terms of each KCSR indenture, the remaining net proceeds realized from the issuance of the Convertible Preferred Stock.

On August, 1, 2003, KCS filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement with the SECCompany was unable to register for resale by the holders the Convertiblepay cash dividends on its Series C Preferred Stock and thedividends in cash or shares of KCS common stock into whichon its Series D Preferred Stock. The dividends accumulate until such preferred stock may be converted. On October 24, 2003, this Registration Statement, as amended, was declared effective by the SEC. KCS has filed, and will continueratio increases to file, post effective amendments to this Registration Statement as required by applicable rules and regulations. KCS will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the securities under this Registration Statement, as amended.

at least 2.0:1. See Note 16 for further discussion.

Stockholder Rights Plan.On September 19, 1995,27, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a dividend distribution of one Rightright for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 12, 1995.2005, replacing a previous Rights Agreement that expired on October 12, 2005. Each Rightright entitles the registered holderstockholder to purchase from the Company 1/1,000thone one-thousandth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock or(or in somecertain circumstances, common stock, other securities, cash or other assets as the case may be,assets), at a price of $210$100 per share (both shares and price are subject to adjustment.

adjustment periodically to prevent dilution). The rights are traded with the Company’s common stock.

The Rights which are automatically attachedPlan has certain anti-takeover provisions that may cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire the common stock, are not exercisable or transferable apart fromCompany without the common stock until the tenth calendar day following the earlier to occurapproval of (unless extended by the Board of Directors and subject to the earlier redemption or expiration of the Rights): (i) the date of a public announcement that an acquiring person acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 20 percent or moreDirectors. The Rights Plan will not interfere with any offer for all of the outstanding sharescommon stock that has the approval of the Independent Directors. The rights will become excercisable after a non-approved person or group has acquired, or a tender offer is made for, 15% or more of the common stock of the Company (or 15 percent(13% or more in the case that such person is considered an “adverse person”), or (ii) the commencement or announcement of an intention to make a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in ancertain acquisitions by “Adverse Persons”). Right holders (other than the acquiring person beneficially owning 20 percent or more of such outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (or 15 percent in the case that such person is considered an “adverse person”). Until exercised, the Rights will have nogroup) may then exercise their rights as a stockholder of the Company, including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive dividends. In connection with certain business combinations resulting in the acquisition of the Company or dispositions of more than 50% of Company assets or earnings power, each Right shall thereafter have the right to receive, upon the exercise thereof at the then current exercisepurchase price, ofand receive the Right, that number of shares of the highest priority voting securities of the acquiring companyPreferred Stock (or in certain of its affiliates) that at the time of such transaction would havecircumstances, common stock) having a market value of two times the exercisepurchase price of the Right. The Rights expire on October 12, 2005, unless earlier redeemed byrights. Additionally, if the Company as described below.

At any time prior to the tenth calendar day after the first date after the public announcement that an acquiring person has acquired beneficial ownership of 20 percent (or 15 percent in some instances)is thereafter merged into another entity, or if more than 50% of the outstanding sharesCompany’s consolidated assets or earning power is sold or transferred, holders of the rights may exercise their rights at the then current purchase price and receive common stock of the Company,acquirer equal to two times the Companypurchase price of the rights. KCS may redeem the Rightsrights for $0.0025 per right until a triggering acquisition. The rights expire October 11, 2010.

Change in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.005 per Right. In addition, the Company’s right of redemption may be reinstated following an inadvertent trigger of the Rights (as determined by the Board) if an acquiring person reduces its beneficial ownership to 10 percent or less of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in a transaction or series of transactions not involving the Company.

The Series A Preferred shares purchasable upon exercise of the Rights will have a cumulative quarterly dividend rate set by the Board of Directors or equal to 1,000 times the dividend declared on the common stock for such quarter. Each share will have the voting rights of one vote on all matters voted at a meeting of the stockholders for each 1/1,000th share of preferred stock held by such stockholder. In the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which the common shares are exchanged, each Series A Preferred share will be entitled to receive an amount equal to 1,000 times the amount to be received per common share. In the event of a liquidation, the holders of Series A Preferred shares will be entitled to receive $1,000 per share or an amount per share equal to 1,000 times the aggregate amount to be distributed per share to holders of common stock. The shares will not be redeemable. The vote of holders of a majority of the Series A Preferred shares, voting together as a class, will be required for any amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation that would materially and adversely alter or change the powers, preferences or special rights of such shares.

Change In Control Provisions.The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into agreements with employees whereby, upon defined circumstances constituting a change in control of the Company or subsidiary, certain stock options become exercisable, certain benefit entitlements are automatically funded and such employees are entitled to specified cash payments upon termination of employment.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have established trusts to provide for the funding of corporate commitments and entitlements of officers, directors, employees and others in the event of a specified change in control of the Company or subsidiary. Assets held in such trusts aton December 31, 20032006, were not material. Depending upon the circumstances at the time of any such change in control, the most significant factor of which

would be the highest price paid for KCS common stock by a party seeking to control the Company, funding of the Company’s trusts could be substantial.

Note 9.  Share-Based Compensation
Stock Option Plan.  The Kansas City Southern 1991 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan (as amended and restated effective May 5, 2004) (the “Plan”) provides for the granting of options to purchase up to 16.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock by officers and other designated employees. Options have been granted under the Plan at 100% of the average market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and generally have a 5 year cliff vesting period and are exercisable


91


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

over the 10 year contractual term, except that options outstanding with limited rights (“LRs”) or limited stock appreciation rights (“LSARs”), become immediately exercisable upon certain defined circumstances constituting a change in control of the Company. The Plan includes provisions for stock appreciation rights, LRs and LSARs. All outstanding options include LSARs, except for options granted to non-employee Directors prior to 1999. The grant date fair value, less estimated forfeitures, is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:
             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Expected dividend yield  0%  0%  0%
Expected volatility  37.84%  26.78%  29.66%
Risk-free interest rate  4.96%  3.41%  2.75%
Expected term(years)
  6.83   5.50   3.43 
Fair value at grant date $12.62  $3.98  $3.64 
The Company has not historically paid dividends to common shareholders. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over a term equal to the estimated life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is determined based on the U.S. Treasury rates approximating the expected life of the options granted, which represents the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding and is based on the historical experience of similar awards.
The following table summarizes activity under the stock option plan:
                 
     Weighted-
  Weighted-
    
     Average
  Average
    
     Exercise
  Remaining
  Aggregate
 
  Number of
  Price
  Contractual
  Intrinsic
 
  Shares  per Share  Term  Value 
        In years  In millions 
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2003  4,612,863  $7.36         
Granted  590,247   14.67         
Exercised  (894,832)  5.64         
Forfeited or expired  (115,536)  12.27         
                 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2004  4,192,742   8.62         
Granted  104,200   17.51         
Exercised  (554,869)  6.88         
Forfeited or expired  (34,680)  10.54         
                 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005  3,707,393   9.11         
Granted  90,800   26.03         
Exercised  (627,907)  10.83         
Forfeited or expired  (229,954)  12.77         
                 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006  2,940,332  $8.98   4.59  $58.8 
                 
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2006  2,929,307  $8.94   4.57  $58.7 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2006  2,499,144  $7.74   4.16  $53.1 
                 
Compensation expense of $0.6 million was recognized for stock option awards for the year ended December 31, 2006. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for stock options was


92


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

$0.2 million. As described in Note 2, no compensation expense was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 as the Company accounted for share-based compensation in accordance with APB 25 prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R on the modified prospective basis on January 1, 2006.
Additional information regarding stock option exercises appears in the table below(in millions):
             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options vested $0.7  $2.1  $1.1 
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised  11.4   9.7   10.8 
Cash received from option exercises  6.7   3.8   5.0 
Excess tax benefit realized from option exercises  0.2       
As of December 31, 2006, $1.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost relating to nonvested stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.47 years. At December 31, 2006, there were 2,693,217 shares available for future grants under the Plan.
Nonvested Stock.  The Kansas City Southern 1991 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan provides for the granting of nonvested stock awards to officers and other designated employees. The grant date fair value is based on the average market price of the stock on the date of the grant. These awards are subject to forfeiture if employment terminates during the vesting period, which is generally five year cliff vesting for employees and one year for directors. The grant date fair value of nonvested shares, less estimated forfeitures, is recorded to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
A summary of nonvested stock activity is as follows:
             
     Weighted-
    
     Average Grant
  Aggregate
 
  Number of
  Date
  Intrinsic
 
  Shares  Fair Value  Value 
        In millions 
 
Nonvested stock at December 31, 2004    $     
Granted  435,032   20.64     
Vested  (7,440)  18.56     
Forfeited  (35,441)  21.88     
             
Nonvested stock at December 31, 2005  392,151   20.57     
Granted  421,002   25.73     
Vested  (58,469)  20.17     
Forfeited  (141,111)  22.33     
             
Nonvested stock at December 31, 2006  613,573  $23.74  $17.8 
             
Compensation cost on nonvested stock was $3.1 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for nonvested stock awards was $1.1 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, $11.0 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock is expected to be recognized over a weighted — average period of 2.07 years. The fair value (at vest date) of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2006, was $1.2 million.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  The Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), established in 1977, provides substantially all full-time employees of the Company, certain subsidiaries and certain other affiliated entities, with the right to subscribe to an aggregate of 11.4 million shares of common stock. Employees may


93


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

elect to withhold an amount from payroll on the offering date in exchange for rights to purchase a fixed number of designated shares of the Company’s common stock. For offerings under the Eighteenth, Seventeenth and Sixteenth Offerings, the purchase prices for shares was equal to 90% of the average market price on either the exercise date or the offering date, whichever is lower. Under SFAS 123R, both the 10% discount in grant price and the 90% share option are valued to derive the award’s fair value. The awards vest and the expense is recognized ratably over one year. The following table summarizes activity related to the various ESPP offerings:
                             
  Offering Date  Exercise Date  Received
 
     Purchase
  Shares
     Purchase
  Shares
  from
 
  Date  Price  Subscribed  Date Issued  Price  Issued  Employees(i) 
                    (In millions) 
 
Eighteenth offering  October 31, 2006  $25.97   101,737     $     $ 
Seventeenth offering  October 31, 2005   20.10   140,867   January 31, 2007   20.10   114,554   2.3 
Sixteenth offering  October 29, 2004   15.14   119,384   January 24, 2006   15.14   109,062   1.7 
(i)Represents amounts received from employees through payroll deductions for share purchases under applicable offering.
The fair value of the ESPP stock purchase rights is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used were as follows:
             
  Eighteenth
  Seventeenth
  Sixteenth
 
  Offering  Offering  Offering 
 
Expected dividends  0%  0%  0%
Expected volatility  32%  28%  27%
Risk free interest rate  4.99%  4.15%  2.85%
Expected life(years)
  1   1   1 
Fair value at grant date $7.15  $5.12  $2.96 
Compensation expense of $0.6 million was recognized for ESPP option awards for the year ended December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, there were 4.1 million remaining shares available for future ESPP offerings.

Note 10.  Note 8. Profit Sharing and Other Postretirement Benefits

Health and Other Postretirement Benefits

Welfare.  Certain U.S. employees that have met age and service requirements are eligible for life insurance coverage and medical benefits during retirement. The Company maintains various plans for the benefit of its employees as described below. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company expensed $0.9 million, $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to the 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company did not recognize any expenses relative to profit sharing or the ESOP.

401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan. During 2000, the Company combined the Profit Sharing Plan and the 401(k) Plan into the KCS 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan permits participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and also allows employees to direct their profit sharing accounts into selected investments. The Company matched employee 401(k) contributions up to a maximum of 5% of compensation in 2003 and 3% of compensation during 2002 and 2001. Qualified profit sharing plans are maintained for most employees not included in collective bargaining agreements. Contributions for the Company and its subsidiaries are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors of KCS in amounts not to exceed the maximum allowable for federal income tax purposes.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan. KCS established the ESOP for employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements. KCS contributions to the ESOP are based on a percentage of wages earned by eligible employees. Contributions and percentages are determined by the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board of Directors.

Other Postretirement Benefits. The Company provides certain medical, life and other postretirement benefits other than pensions to its retirees. The medical and life plans are available to employees not covered under collective bargaining arrangements, who have attained age 60 and rendered ten years of service. Individuals employed as of December 31, 1992 were excluded from a specific service requirement. Theretiree medical plan is contributory and provides benefits forto retirees, their covered dependents and beneficiaries. The medical plan provides for an annual adjustment ofadjustments to retiree contributions, and also contains, depending on the plan coverage selected, certain deductibles, co-payments, coinsuranceco-insurance, and coordination with Medicare. Certain management employees also maintain their status under a collective bargaining agreement, which permits them access to post-retirement medical under the multiemployer plan described below. The life insurance plan is non-contributory and covers retirees only. The Company’s policy, in most cases, is to fund benefits payable under these plans as the obligations become due. However, certain plan assets (money market funds held in a life insurance company) exist with respect to life insurance benefits. A life insurance company holds these assets and

KCSM Union Pension.  Under the provisions of a bargaining agreement for covered employees in Mexico, the Company receives an investment returnprovides a substantive pension benefit in the form of a lump-sum post-retirement payment to retirees who leave the Company after age 60. The benefit to retirees is based on these assetsa statutory termination indemnity calculation under Mexico law which is based on the six-month Treasury Bill rate plus 25 basis points.retiree’s salary at the time of retirement and the number of years of credited service. The Company’s practice is to fund benefits under this program as the obligations become due.


94


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following assumptionsCompany uses December 31 as the measurement date for its pension and post-retirement benefit obligations.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost, Plan Obligations and Funded Status
Components of the net cost (benefit) for these plans were used to determine postretirement obligations/costsas follows for the years ended December 31:31(in millions):
                     
  Health and Welfare  Pension 
  2006  2005  2004  2006  2005(i) 
 
Service cost $0.1  $0.1  $0.2  $1.7  $1.1 
Interest cost  0.5   0.5   0.6   1.0   0.6 
Expected return on plan assets               
Actuarial (gain) loss (ii)  (0.7)  0.1   (1.0)  (2.6)  0.7 
Prior service credit (iii)  (0.3)            
                     
Net periodic cost (benefit) recognized $(0.4) $0.7  $(0.2) $0.1  $2.4 
                     
(i)The obligation related to the KCSM pension was acquired with the change in control and consolidation of KCSM beginning April 1, 2005. The pension cost presented for 2005 represents an estimated cost for the nine month period from April 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005. Prior to April 1, 2005, KCSM was accounted for as an equity method investee. The pension obligation was established during the finalization of purchase accounting (see Note 4). The pension costs since the date of acquisition have been included in the results for the year ended December 31, 2006.
(ii)Net benefit costs above do not include a component for the amortization of actuarial gains or losses as the Company’s policy is to recognize such gains and losses immediately.
(iii)During 2005, the Company revised its medical plan to exclude prescription drug coverage available under Medicare part D. This negative plan amendment generated an unrecognized prior service benefit of $2.3 million which is being amortized over the estimated remaining life of the affected participants of 9.5 years.


95

   2003

  2002

 

Annual increase in CPI

  2.25% 2.50%

Expected rate of return on life insurance plan assets

  6.50  6.50 

Discount rate

  6.00  6.50 

Salary increase

  3.00  3.00 


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table reconciles the change in the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, change in the funded status, and the accrued benefit cost as of and for each of the years ended December 31(in millions):
                 
  Health and Welfare  Pension 
  2006  2005  2006  2005(i) 
 
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $8.6  $9.1  $12.4  $10.0 
Obligation from acquisition of Mexrail     2.0       
Plan amendment     (2.3)      
Service cost  0.1   0.1   1.7   1.1 
Interest cost  0.5   0.5   1.0   0.6 
Actuarial (gain) loss  (0.7)  0.1   (2.6)  0.7 
Benefits paid, net of retiree contributions(ii)  (1.3)  (0.9)  (0.4)   
                 
Benefit obligation at end of year  7.2   8.6   12.1   12.4 
                 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  0.7   0.8         
Actual return on plan assets  (0.1)  0.1         
Benefits paid, net of contributions (ii)  (0.1)  (0.2)        
                 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  0.5   0.7         
                 
Funded status  (6.7)  (7.9)  (12.1)  (12.4)
Unrecognized prior service benefit (iii)     (2.3)      
                 
Accrued benefit cost $(6.7) $(10.2) $(12.1) $(12.4)
                 
(i)The obligation related to the KCSM pension was acquired with the change in control and consolidation of KCSM beginning April 1, 2005. The beginning obligation presented for 2005 represents the obligation as of the acquisition on April 1, 2005 and the 2005 activity as presented is for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005.
(ii)Benefits paid for the reconciliation of the benefit obligation include both medical and life insurance benefits, whereas benefits paid from the reconciliation of the funded status include only life insurance benefits. Plan assets relate only to life insurance benefits. Medical benefits are funded as obligations become due.
(iii)The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 158 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Accordingly, the unrecognized prior service benefit related to the plan amendment in 2005 ($2.1 million at December 31, 2006) was reclassified from liabilities and has been included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Assumptions
The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and costs are selected based on current and expected market conditions. Discount rates are selected based on low risk government bonds with cash flows approximating the timing of expected benefit payments. The Mexico bond market is utilized for the KCSM pension obligation and the U.S. bond market is utilized for the U.S. health and welfare obligation. The expected rate of return on life insurance plan assets is determined using historical and forward looking returns for similar investments over the period that the benefits are expected to be paid.


96


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations were as follows for the years ended December 31:
                 
  Health and Welfare  Pension 
  2006  2005  2006  2005 
 
Discount rate  5.75%  5.40%  8.00%  8.00%
Rate of compensation increase  n/a   n/a   5.00%  5.50%
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost for the periods were as follows for the years ended December 31:
                 
  Health and Welfare  Pension 
  2006  2005  2006  2005 
 
Discount rate  5.40%  5.65%  8.00%  8.00%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  3.00%  6.25%  n/a   n/a 
Rate of compensation increase  n/a   n/a   5.00%  5.50%
The Company’s health care costs, excluding former Gateway Western employees and certain former employees of the MidSouth participants, are limited to the increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) with a maximum annual increase of 5%. Accordingly, health care costs in excess of the CPI limit will be borne by the plan participants, and therefore assumptions regarding health care cost trend ratestrends are not applicable.

During 2001, the Company reduced its liability and recorded a reduction of operating expenses by approximately $2.0 million in connection with the transfer of union employees formerly covered by the Gateway Western plan to a multi-employer sponsored union plan, which effectively eliminated the Company’s postretirement liability for this group of employees. This reduced the number of former Gateway Western employees or retirees covered under Gateway Western’s benefit plan. The Gateway Western benefit plans are slightly different from those of the Company and other subsidiaries. Gateway Western provides contributory health, dental and life insurance benefits to these remaining employees and retirees. In 2001, the assumed annual rate of increase in health care costs for Gateway Western employees and retirees under this plan was 10%, decreasing over six years to 5.5% in 2008 and thereafter. An increase or decrease infollowing table presents the assumed health care cost trend rates by one percent in 2003, 2002trends related to Gateway Western and 2001 would not have a significant impact onMidsouth participants:

             
  2006  2005  2004 
 
Health care trend rate for next year  9.00%  10.00%  10.25%
Ultimate trend rate  5.00%  5.00%  5.25%
Year that rate reaches ultimate rate  2010   2010   2009 
Cash Flows
The following table represents benefit payments expected to be paid, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, for each of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. The effect of this change onnext five years and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of the net periodic postretirement benefit is not significant.

A reconciliation of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, change in plan assets and funded status, respectively, at December 31 followsfive years thereafter(in millions):

         
  Health and
    
Year
 Welfare  Pension 
 
2007 $0.9  $1.0 
2008  0.9   0.3 
2009  0.9   0.4 
2010  0.8   0.5 
2011  0.8   0.7 
2012 — 2016  3.5   8.9 
Multi-Employer Plan.

   2003

  2002

 

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $10.0  $9.1 

Service cost

   0.2   0.2 

Interest cost

   0.6   0.6 

Actuarial and other (gain) loss

   (2.3)  1.0 

Benefits paid (i)

   (0.9)  (0.9)
   


 


Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at end of year

   7.6   10.0 
   


 


Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

   1.0   1.0 

Actual return on plan assets

   0.1   0.1 

Benefits paid (i)

   (0.1)  (0.1)
   


 


Fair value of plan assets at end of year

   1.0   1.0 
   


 


Funded status and accrued benefit cost

  $(6.6) $(9.0)
   


 



(i)Benefits paid for the reconciliation of accumulated postretirement benefit obligation include both medical and life insurance benefits, whereas benefits paid for the fair value of plan assets reconciliation include only life insurance benefits. Plan assets relate only to the life insurance benefits. Medical benefits are funded as obligations become due.

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost included the following components (in millions):

   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Service cost

  $0.2  $0.2  $0.2 

Interest cost

   0.6   0.6   0.8 

Expected return on plan assets

   —     (0.1)  (0.1)
   

  


 


Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

  $0.8  $0.7  $0.9 
   

  


 


During 2001 a post-retirement benefit for directors was eliminated, resulting in a reduction of the related liability of approximately $1.4 million.

Under collective bargaining agreements, KCSR participates in a multi-employer benefit plan, which provides certain post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits to eligible union employees and certain retirees. Premiums under this plan are expensed as incurred and were $1.7$2.6 million, $1.0$2.6 million, and $0.8$1.9 million for 2003, 2002the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2001,2004, respectively. Based on existing rates, premium amounts are not expected to change substantially in 20042007 as compared to 2003.2006.

401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan.  The Company sponsors the KCS 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) plan”), whereby participants can choose to make contributions in the form of salary deductions pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches 401(k) contributions up to a


97


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

maximum of 5% of compensation. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company expensed $1.5 million, $1.4 million, and $1.2 million, respectively, related to the KCS 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan.

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies

Note 11.  Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation.  The Company and its subsidiaries are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. While the ultimate outcome of theis a party to various legal proceedings involvingand administrative actions, all of which are of an ordinary, routine nature and incidental to its operations. Included in these proceedings are various tort claims brought by current and former employees for job related injuries and by third parties for injuries related to railroad operations. KCS aggressively defends these matters and has established liability reserves which management believes are adequate to cover expected costs. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding, in the opinion of management, other than those proceedings described in detail below, such proceedings and actions should not, individually, or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. However, a material adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could have a material adverse impact on the operating results of a particular period.
Reinsurance Litigation.  As previously disclosed in the Company’s quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, insurance companies who provided insurance to the Company and its subsidiaries cannot be predicted with certainty, it is management’s opinionfiled an action in federal court in Vermont (“Reinsurance Litigation”) seeking a declaration that they have no obligation to indemnify the estimated liabilities related to the Company’s litigation are adequate.

Company concerning a particular casualty claim. That claim, styledBogalusa CasesKemp, et al v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, et al

In July 1996, KCSR, was named as one of twenty-seven defendants in various lawsuits in Louisiana and Mississippi arising from the explosion of a rail car loaded with chemicals in Bogalusa, Louisiana on October 23, 1995. As a result of the explosion, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen were released into the atmosphere over parts of that town and the surrounding area allegedly causing evacuations and injuries. Approximately 25,000 residents of Louisiana and Mississippi (plaintiffs) have asserted claims to recover damages allegedly caused by exposure to the released chemicals. On October 29, 2001, KCSR and representatives for its excess insurance carriers negotiated a settlement in principle with the plaintiffs for $22.3 million. A Master Global Settlement Agreement (“MGSA”) was signed in early 2002. During 2002, KCSR made all payments under this agreement and collected $19.3 million from its excess insurance carriers. Court approval of the MGSA is expected in 2004 from the 22nd Judicial District Court of Washington Parish, Louisiana. KCSR also expects to receive releases from about 4,000 Mississippi plaintiffs in numerous cases pendingfiled in the First Judicial District Circuit Court of HindsJackson County, Mississippi.

Houston Cases

In August 2000, KCSRMissouri (“Kemp Litigation”) and certain of its affiliates were added as defendantswent to trial in lawsuits pending in Jefferson and Harris Counties, Texas. These lawsuits allege damage to approximately 3,000 plaintiffs as a result of an alleged toxic chemical release from a tank car in Houston, Texas on August 21, 1998. Litigation involving the shipper and the delivering carrier had been pending for some time, but KCSR, which handled the car during the course of its transport, had not previously been named a defendant. On June 28, 2001, KCSRSeptember 2006. The Company reached a final settlement with the 1,664 plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed in Jefferson County, Texas. In 2002, KCSR settled with virtually all of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filedKemp Litigation. The Company also reached settlements with various parties, including several of the insurance companies involved in the 164th Judicial District CourtReinsurance Litigation, to indemnify the Company for a significant portion of Harris County, Texas, for approximately $0.3 million.the settlement. The remaining plaintiffs have indicated that they intend to retain new counsel, yet to date, KCSKemp settlement is fully reflected in the Company’s financial statements and the Company has not received any notice of new counsel entering the case.

Stilwell Tax Dispute

On November 19, 2002, Stilwell Financial, Inc. (“Stilwell”), now Janus Capital Group Inc., filed a Statement of Claim against KCS with the American Arbitration Association. This claim involves the entitlement to compensation expense deductions for federal income tax purposes which areno further risk associated with this litigation. The Company is, however, continuing the exercise ofReinsurance Litigation against certain stock options issued by Stilwell (the “Substituted Options”) in connection with the Spin-off of Stilwell from KCS on July 12, 2000. Stilwell alleges that upon exercise of a Substituted Option, Stilwell is entitledother insurance companies, seeking to the associated compensation expense deductions. Stilwell bases its claim on a letter, dated August 17, 1999, addressed to Landon H. Rowland, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. (the “Letter”), purporting to allow Stilwell to claim such deductions. The Letter was signed by the Vice President and Tax Counsel of Stilwell, who was also at the time the Senior Assistant Vice President and Tax Counsel of KCS, and by Landon H. Rowland, currently a director of KCS and the former non-executive Chairman of Janus Capital Group Inc., who was at that time a director and officer of both Stilwell and KCS.

Stilwell seeks a declaratory award and/or injunction ordering KCS to file and amend its tax returns for the tax year 2000 and subsequent years to reflect that KCS does not claim the associated compensation expense deductions andestablish their obligation to indemnify Stilwell against any related taxes imposed upon Stilwell, which allegedly has taken, and plans to take, such deductions. On December 20, 2002, KCS filed an Objection to Stilwell’s Demandthe Company for

Arbitration and Motion to Dismiss. KCS disputes the validity and enforceability their share of the Letter. KCS asserts, among other things, that a Private Letter Ruling issued by the Internal Revenue Service on July 9, 1999 provides that KCS subsidiaries are entitled to compensation expense deductions upon exercise of Substituted Options by their employees.

KCS has answered that the claims of Stilwell are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. Given the stage of the proceeding, KCS is unable to predict the outcome, but does not expect this matter to result in any material adverse financial consequences to KCS’s net income in the event, which it regards as unlikely, that it would not prevail.

settlement with Kemp.

Environmental Liabilities.  The Company’s U.S. operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The major U.S. environmental laws to which the Company is subject include, among others, the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA,” also known as the Superfund law), the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act. CERCLA can impose joint and several liabilityliabilities for cleanup and investigation costs, without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on current and predecessor owners and operators of a site, as well as those who generate, or arrange for the disposal of, hazardous substances. The Company does not foreseebelieve that compliance with the requirements imposed by the environmental legislation will impair its competitive capability or result in any material additional capital expenditures, operating or maintenance costs.

The Company is, however, subject to environmental remediation costs as described below.

The Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment through the establishment of standards for water discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and solid waste. The Mexican government may bring administrative and criminal proceedings and impose economic sanctions against companies that violate environmental laws, and temporarily or even permanently close non-complying facilities.
The risk of incurring environmental liability is inherent in the railroad industry. As part of serving the petroleum and chemicals industry, KCSRthe Company transports hazardous materials and has a professional team available to respond and handle environmental issues that might occur in the transport of such materials. Additionally, the Company is a partner in the Responsible Care® program and, as a result, has initiated certain


98


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

additional environmental, health and safety programs. KCSRThe Company performs ongoing reviews and evaluations of the various environmental programs and issues within the Company’s operations, and, as necessary, takes actions intended to limit the Company’s exposure to potential liability.

The Company owns property that is, or has been, used for industrial purposes. Use of these properties may subject the Company to potentially material liabilities relating to the investigation and cleanup of contaminants, claims alleging personal injury, or property damage as the result of exposures to, or release of, hazardous substances. Although the Company is responsible for investigating and remediating contamination at several locations, based on currently available information, the Company does not expect any related liabilities, individually or collectively, to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In the event thatShould the Company becomesbecome subject to more stringent cleanup requirements at these sites, discoversdiscover additional contamination, or becomesbecome subject to related personal or property damage claims, the Company could incur material costs in connection with these sites.

The Company records liabilities for remediation and restoration costs related to past activities when the Company’s obligation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of ongoing compliance activities to current operations are expensed as incurred. The Company’s recorded liabilities for these issues represent its best estimates (on an undiscounted basis) of remediation and restoration costs that may be required to comply with present laws and regulations. Although these costs cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the ultimate outcome of identified matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Environmental remediation expense was $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, and was included in purchased services expense on the consolidated statements of income. Additionally, as of December 31, 2006, KCS had a liability for environmental remediation of $7.8 million. This amount was derived from a range of reasonable estimates based upon the studies and site surveys described above and in accordance with SFAS 5.
Casualty Claim Reserves.  The Company’s casualty and liability reserve for its U.S. business segment is based on a study by an independent third party actuarial firm performed on an undiscounted basis. The reserve is based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. While the ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on various factors, it is management’s opinion that the recorded liability is a reasonable estimate of aggregate future claims. Adjustments to the liability are reflected as operating expenses in the period in which the adjustments are known. Casualty claims in excess of self-insurance levels are insured up to certain coverage amounts, depending on the type of claim and year of occurrence. The activity in the reserve follows(in millions):
         
  2006  2005 
 
Balance at beginning of year $103.9  $52.8 
Liability acquired in the Mexrail acquisition     13.9 
Accruals, net (includes the impact of actuarial studies)  35.0   57.6 
Payments  (21.5)  (20.4)
         
Balance at end of year $117.4  $103.9 
         
Based on an updated study of casualty reserves for data through November 30, 2006 and the settlement of the Kemp case; the reserves for FELA, third party, and occupational illness claims are reflected in the table above for the year ended December 31, 2006. The changes to the reserve in the current year reflect the Kemp settlements and favorable loss experience in 2006.
During the third quarter of 2005, the Company initiated a new comprehensive actuarial study of all of its casualty reserves. Based on that study, the reserves for FELA, third-party and occupational illness claims were


99


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

increased, resulting in a charge to third quarter operating income of $37.8 million. The charge reflects the impact of higher settlements for major FELA and third-party claims and significant increases in the frequency of these claims in 2004 and 2005. In addition, the charge includes reserves for occupational illness including asbestos-related claims that were established on an actuarial basis for the first time.
Based on the results of the actuarial study, reserves for FELA and third-party claims were increased $30.3 million. The majority of these increases are attributable to adverse experience occurring since the previous year’s study, including an increase in the number of new claims and adverse development in the dollar amount of potential settlements for many significant prior claims.
Management believes that its previous reserve estimates for those prior claims were reasonable based on the information available at the time. The Company is continuing its practice of accruing monthly for estimated claim costs at levels recommended by the actuarial study and evaluation of recent known trends, and those accruals have been increased accordingly.
Disputes Relating to Payments for the Use of Trackage and Haulage Rights and Interline Services.  KCSM and Ferromex both initiated administrative proceedings seeking a determination by theSecretaria de Communicaciones y Transportes(“Secretariat of Communications and Transports” or “SCT”) of the rates that the companies should pay each other in connection with the use of trackage and haulage rights and interline and terminal services. The SCT, on March 13, 2002, issued rulings setting the rates for trackage and haulage rights. On August 5, 2002, the SCT issued a ruling setting the rates for interline and terminal services. KCSM and Ferromex appealed both rulings and, following trial and appellate court decisions, the Mexican Supreme Court on February 24, 2006, sustained KCSM’s appeal of the SCT’s trackage and haulage rights ruling, vacating the ruling and ordering the SCT to issue a new ruling consistent with the Court’s opinion. KCSM has not yet received the written opinion of the Mexican Supreme Court relating to the decision nor has the Mexican Supreme Court decided the interline and terminal services appeal. The Company believes that even if the rates set in 2002 become effective, there will be no material adverse effect on KCS’ results of operations. On October 2, 2006, KCS was served with a claim raised by Ferromex in which Ferromex asked for information concerning the interline traffic between KCSM and Ferromex, from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2004, and an answer to this claim has been filed.
Disputes Relating to the Scope of the Mandatory Trackage Rights.  The SCT issued rulings determining Ferromex’s trackage rights in Monterrey in 2002. KCSM and Ferromex both appealed the SCT’s rulings. KCSM obtained a favorable ruling at the administrative federal court level. Ferromex appealed the ruling. The case was remanded to the Administrative Federal Court with the instructions to consider additional arguments before issuing its ruling. KCSM is still awaiting that ruling, but does not expect the ruling to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Claims Asserted under the TMM Acquisition Agreement.  As part of the acquisition of Grupo KCSM in 2005, KCS issued escrow notes totaling $47.0 million which are subject to reduction for certain potential losses related to incorrect representations and warranties or breaches of covenants in the Acquisition Agreement by TMM. On January 29, 2007, KCS advised TMM that KCS intended to assert claims for indemnification under the acquisition agreement related to representations and warranties made by TMM. On February 1, 2007, KCS received notice from TMM indicating that TMM would seek damages from KCS under the Acquisition Agreement, aggregating approximately $43 million as well as other unspecified damages. The parties are obligated under the Acquisition Agreement to attempt to resolve their differences informally and, if not successful, then to submit them to binding arbitration.
Acquisitions of Locomotives.  KCSM entered into an agreement with General Electric Company (“GE”) on August 14, 2006, to acquire 30 locomotives at a cost of approximately $63.7 million. Of the 30 locomotives, KCSM has taken legal possession of 22 as of December 31, 2006 with the remainder to be completed and delivered in the first quarter of 2007. The 22 locomotives where legal possession has been


100


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

taken have been recorded as assets held for sale at year-end. Upon completion and delivery of all 30 units, the Company will enter into a sale-leaseback transaction with the locomotives.
On August 25, 2006, KCSR entered into an agreement with Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. (“EMD”) to acquire 30 locomotives to be delivered June 2007 through September 2007 at a total cost of $61.5 million. The Company intends to finance the acquisitions with equipment lease financings treated as operating leases.
Letters of Intent.  KCSR and KCSM entered into a letter of intent with GE on September 28, 2006, to acquire 80 locomotives to be delivered in late 2007 through August 2008 at an aggregate cost of approximately $160.8 million. KCSR intends to acquire 30 of these locomotives and KCSM intends to acquire the other 50. The letter of intent also provides KCSR and KCSM with an option to acquire an additional aggregate 40 locomotives for delivery in 2008. KCSR and KCSM each anticipates entering into purchase agreements with GE in the first quarter of 2007 with respect to the 80 locomotives. KCSR and KCSM entered into a letter of intent with EMD on November 29, 2006, to acquire 70 locomotives for delivery in October 2007 through April 2008 at an aggregate cost of approximately $140.9 million. KCSR intends to acquire 30 of these locomotives and KCSM intends to acquire the other 40. The Company intends to finance the acquisitions with equipment lease financings treated as operating leases.
Panama Canal Railway Company.  Under certain limited conditions, the Company is a guarantor for up to $5.6 million of cash deficiencies associated with the operations of PCRC. In addition, the Company is a guarantor for up to $1.9$3.0 million of equipment loans. Further, if the Company or its partner terminateterminates the concession contract without the consent of the IFC, the Company is a guarantor for up to 50%half of the outstanding senior loans. See Note 3.

Note 10. Derivative Instruments and Purchase Commitments

Derivative Instruments.

Note 12.  Derivative Instruments
The Company does not engage in the trading of derivatives. The Company’s objective for using derivative instruments is to manage its fuel and interest rateprice risk and mitigate the impact of fluctuations in fuel prices and interest rates.currency fluctuations. In general, the Company enters into derivative transactions in limited situations based on management’s assessment of current market conditions and perceived risks. ManagementHowever, management intends to respond to evolving business and market conditions in order to manage risks and exposures associated with the Company’s various operations, and in doing so, may enter into such transactions more frequently as deemed appropriate.

Fuel Derivative TransactionsTransactions.

At December 31, 2003 the  The Company was a party to seven fuel swap agreements for a notional amount of approximately 9.8 million gallons of fuel. Under the terms of these swaps, the Company receives a variable price based upon an average of the spot prices calculated on a monthly basis as reported through a petroleum price reporting service and pays a fixed price determined at the time the Company enters into the swap transaction. The variable price the Company is receiving is approximately equal to the price the Company is paying in the market for locomotive fuel. By entering into these swap transactions, the Company is able to fix the cost of fuel for the notional amount of gallons hedged.

A summary of the swap agreements to which KCSR was a party as of December 31, 2003 follows:

Trade Dates


Notional Amount

Fixed pay
per gallon


Expiration Date

November 14, 2002 through October 31, 2003

9.8 million gallons62.5¢–69.0¢December 31, 2003 through
December 31, 2005

Cash settlements of these swaps occur on a monthly basis on the fifth business day of the month following the month in which the settlement is calculated. As of December 31, 2003, the fair market value of the benefit of the swaps was $0.9 million. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, KCSR consumed 55.4 million, 55.3 million and 57.61.3 million gallons of fuel respectively.

on December 31, 2006. Fuel hedging transactions, including fuel swaps as well as forward purchase commitments, resulted in a decrease in fuel expense of $1.1$0.7 million, $2.4 million and $0.4$3.0 million in 20032006, 2005 and 2002,2004, respectively. Fuel purchase commitments resulted in an increase in fuel expense of $0.4 million in 2001.

Interest Rate Derivative Transactions

The Company did not participate in any interest rate derivative transactions during 2003 and had no interest rate hedge transactions outstanding as ofSubsequent to December 31, 20032006, KCS entered into fuel swap agreements for 1.3 million gallons.

Foreign Exchange Contracts.  The purpose of KCSM’s foreign exchange contracts is to limit the risks arising from exchange rate fluctuations in its Mexican peso-denominated monetary assets and 2002. Atliabilities. Management determines the nature and quantity of any hedging transactions based upon net asset exposure and market conditions. On December 31, 2001,2006, KCSM had one peso call option outstanding in the Company had five separate interest rate cap agreements for an aggregate notionalnotational amount of $200 million. These agreements expired during 2002.

Southern Capital

In addition, the Company records adjustments to its stockholders’ equity (accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)) for its portion$1.7 million based on an exchange rate per dollar of the adjustment to the fair value of derivative transactions to which Southern Capital was a participant.14.50 Mexican pesos. The Company also adjusts its investment in Southern Capital by the changeoption expires May 30, 2007. On December 31, 2005, KCSM had two Mexican peso call options in the fair value of these derivative instruments. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company recorded a reduction to its stockholders equity (accumulated other comprehensive loss) of approximately $0.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, for its portion of the amount recorded by Southern Capital for the adjustment to the fair value of its interest rate swap transactions. The Company also reduced its investment in Southern Capital by the same amount.

During 2002, in conjunction with the refinancing of its debt, Southern Capital terminated these interest rate swap transactions. As a result, Southern Capital is amortizing the balance of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense over the former remaining life of the interest rate swap transactions. The Company is recording the impact of this charge through a related reduction in equity earnings from Southern Capital and is amortizing the related accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balance to its investment in Southern Capital. During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded related amortizationnotational amounts of $1.2 million and $0.7$1.7 million, based on the average exchange rate of 13.00 and 12.50 pesos per dollar, respectively.

These options expired on September 6 and May 30, 2006, respectively.
Foreign Currency Balances.  At December 31, 2006, KCSM had monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Mexican pesos of Ps2,304 million and Ps651 million, respectively. At December 31, 2005, KCSM had monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Mexican pesos of Ps1,088 million and Ps549 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the exchange rate was 10.82 pesos per dollar and 10.64 pesos per dollar, respectively.


101


[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Kansas City Southern
Note 11. QuarterlyNotes to Consolidated Financial Data (Unaudited)Statements — (Continued)

(in millions, except per share amounts):

   2003

 
   Fourth
Quarter


  Third
Quarter


  Second
Quarter


  First
Quarter


 

Revenues

  $148.5  $146.3  $146.3  $140.2 

Operating expenses

   139.1   115.2   116.1   117.5 

Depreciation and amortization

   16.2   16.2   16.0   15.9 
   


 


 


 


Operating income (loss)

   (6.8)  14.9   14.2   6.8 

Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

                 

Grupo TFM

   6.1   1.6   (2.3)  6.9 

Other

   (0.3)  (0.9)  (0.2)  0.1 

Interest expense

   (11.6)  (11.6)  (11.7)  (11.5)

Other income

   2.0   2.0   1.5   1.3 
   


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect
of accounting change

   (10.6)  6.0   1.5   3.6 
   


 


 


 


Income taxes provision (benefit)

   (5.4)  1.7   2.0   (1.1)
   


 


 


 


Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change

   (5.2)  4.3   (0.5)  4.7 

Cumulative effect of accounting change

   —     —     —     8.9 
   


 


 


 


Net income (loss)

  $(5.2) $4.3  $(0.5) $13.6 
   


 


 


 


Per Share Data (i)

                 

Total basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $(0.10) $0.02  $(0.03) $0.22 
   


 


 


 


Total diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $(0.10) $0.02  $(0.03) $0.22 
   


 


 


 


Dividends per share: $25 par preferred stock

  $0.25  $0.25  $0.25  $0.25 

Dividends per share: $1 Par Convertible Preferred Stock

  $5.32  $5.90  $—    $—   

Stock Price Ranges:

                 

Preferred—High

  $20.00  $20.25  $20.00  $20.50 

—Low

  $18.50  $18.75  $16.90  $17.25 

Common—High

  $14.97  $13.37  $12.78  $13.02 

—Low

  $10.95  $10.60  $10.70  $10.65 

Note 13.  Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
                 
  Fourth  Third  Second  First 
  In millions, except per share amounts 
 
2006
                
Revenues $442.4  $415.7  $413.1  $388.4 
Operating income  88.2   77.3   77.5   61.3 
Net income  40.6   31.3   24.1   12.9 
Per share data:
                
Basic earnings per common share $0.48  $0.35  $0.26  $0.11 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.41   0.32   0.24   0.11 
Dividends per share:
                
$25 par preferred stock $0.25  $0.25  $0.25  $0.25 
$1 par series C preferred stock           5.31 
$1 par series D preferred stock           9.40 
Stock price ranges:
                
$25 par preferred:                
 — High $23.65  $23.50  $23.75  $23.50 
 — Low  22.75   22.25   22.00   22.00 
Common:                
 — High $30.00  $28.41  $27.75  $26.17 
 — Low  26.49   23.24   23.46   22.32 
2005
                
Revenues $388.1  $384.6  $381.1  $198.2 
Operating income (loss)  47.7   (1.9)  (8.3)  24.8 
Net income (loss)  5.2   112.7   (25.1)  8.1 
Per share data:
                
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $0.03  $1.35  $(0.33) $0.09 
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share  0.03   1.14   (0.33)  0.09 
Dividends per share:
                
$25 par preferred stock $0.25  $0.25  $0.25  $0.25 
$1 par series C preferred stock(i)  5.31   5.31   5.31   5.31 
$1 par series D preferred stock            
Stock price ranges:
                
$25 par preferred:                
 — High $23.50  $23.50  $23.50  $24.00 
 — Low  22.00   22.60   22.00   21.45 
Common:                
 — High $25.71  $23.44  $21.00  $20.34 
 — Low  20.55   19.47   18.45   16.05 
(i)The accumulationaddition of 2003’s four quarters for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share data doesof dividends on the $1 Par Preferred Stock Series C do not total the respective earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2003annual amount of $21.25, due to rounding.


102


   2002

 
   Fourth
Quarter


  Third
Quarter


  Second
Quarter


  First
Quarter


 

Revenues

  $144.2  $138.9  $139.2  $143.9 

Operating expenses

   114.2   116.9   110.1   115.6 

Depreciation and amortization

   16.1   15.8   14.6   14.9 
   


 


 


 


Operating income

   13.9   6.2   14.5   13.4 

Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates
Grupo TFM

   18.2   9.8   13.0   4.8 

Other

   (0.5)  (0.7)  (1.3)  0.1 

Gain on sale of Mexrail, Inc.

   —     —     —     4.4 

Interest expense

   (11.7)  (11.5)  (10.5)  (11.3)

Debt retirement costs

   —     —     (4.3)  —   

Other income

   2.3   6.5   4.4   4.4 
   


 


 


 


Income from operations before income taxes

   22.2   10.3   15.8   15.8 

Income taxes provision (benefit)

   1.8   (0.3)  1.3   4.1 
   


 


 


 


Net income

  $20.4  $10.6  $14.5  $11.7 
   


 


 


 


Per Share Data

                 

Total basic earnings per common share

  $0.33  $0.17  $0.24  $0.20 
   


 


 


 


Total diluted earnings per common share

  $0.32  $0.17  $0.23  $0.19 
   


 


 


 


Dividends per share: $25 par preferred stock

  $0.25  $0.25  $0.25  $0.25 

Stock Price Ranges:

                 

Preferred—High

  $20.00  $19.85  $20.75  $19.50 

—Low

  $18.00  $16.25  $19.45  $17.95 

Common—High

  $15.00  $17.35  $17.00  $15.99 

—Low

  $12.00  $12.75  $14.96  $12.75 

Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Note 12. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Note 14.  Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

As discussed in Note 5,6, KCSR has outstanding $200 million of 91/2% Notes due 2008 and $200 million of 71/2% Notes due 2009. Both of these note issuesThese notes are unsecured obligations of KCSR, however, they are also jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by KCS and certain of its subsidiaries (all of which are wholly-owned) within the KCS consolidated group.wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. For each of these note issues, KCSR registered exchange notes with the SEC that have substantially identical terms and associated guarantees and all of the initial senior notes for each issue have been exchanged for $200 million of registered exchange notes for each respective note issue.

The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information(in millions)has been prepared and presented pursuant to SECRegulation S-X RuleS-XRule 3-10 “Financial statements of guarantors and affiliates whose securities collateralize an issue registered or being registered.” This condensed information is not intended to present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the individual companies or groups of companies in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
                         
  2006 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Revenues $  $789.3  $10.0  $881.3  $(20.9) $1,659.7 
Operating expenses  16.7   631.7   19.5   708.4   (20.9)  1,355.4 
                         
Operating income (loss)  (16.7)  157.6   (9.5)  172.9      304.3 
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates  130.2   (1.7)     4.9   (126.1)  7.3 
Interest expense  (5.7)  (65.1)  (1.7)  (96.1)  1.4   (167.2)
Debt retirement costs     (2.2)     (2.6)     (4.8)
Foreign exchange loss           (3.7)     (3.7)
Other income  0.7   10.7      8.7   (1.4)  18.7 
                         
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest  108.5   99.3   (11.2)  84.1   (126.1)  154.6 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (0.7)  32.1   (4.3)  18.3      45.4 
Minority interest  0.3               0.3 
                         
Net income (loss) $108.9  $67.2  $(6.9) $65.8  $(126.1) $108.9 
                         


103

   December 31, 2003

 
   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  

Non-

Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


 
   (dollars in millions) 

Revenues

  $—    $575.0  $21.5  $15.4  $(30.6) $581.3 

Operating expenses

   13.5   517.7   20.9   30.7   (30.6)  552.2 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Operating income (loss)

   (13.5)  57.3   0.6   (15.3)  —     29.1 

Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates and subsidiaries

   12.5   11.7   —     11.1   (24.3)  11.0 

Interest expense

   (0.6)  (45.8)  (0.5)  —     0.5   (46.4)

Other income

   0.1   5.9   0.1   1.2   (0.5)  6.8 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

   (1.5)  29.1   0.2   (3.0)  (24.3)  0.5 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (4.8)  7.2   0.1   (5.3)  —     (2.8)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

   3.3   21.9   0.1   2.3   (24.3)  3.3 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes

   8.9   8.9   —     —     (8.9)  8.9 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net income

  $12.2  $30.8  $0.1  $2.3  $(33.2) $12.2 
   


 


 


 


 


 


   December 31, 2002

 
   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  

Non-

Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


 
   (dollars in millions) 

Revenues

  $—    $567.4  $18.1  $38.3  $(57.6) $566.2 

Operating expenses

   10.8   506.4   19.5   39.1   (57.6)  518.2 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Operating income (loss)

   (10.8)  61.0   (1.4)  (0.8)  —     48.0 

Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates and subsidiaries

   61.5   45.6   —     43.6   (107.3)  43.4 

Gain on sale of Mexrail

   —     4.4   —     —     —     4.4 

Interest expense

   (0.4)  (44.1)  (0.4)  (0.1)  —     (45.0)

Debt retirement costs

   —     (4.3)  —     —     —     (4.3)

Other income

   3.9   11.0   2.0   0.7   —     17.6 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

   54.2   73.6   0.2   43.4   (107.3)  64.1 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (3.0)  10.6   0.1   (0.8)  —     6.9 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net income

  $57.2  $63.0  $0.1  $44.2  $(107.3) $57.2 
   


 


 


 


 


 


   December 31, 2001

 
   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


 
   (dollars in millions) 

Revenues

  $—    $580.3  $12.3  $20.1  $(29.5) $583.2 

Operating expenses

   13.6   511.4   13.1   19.2   (29.5)  527.8 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Operating income (loss)

   (13.6)  68.9   (0.8)  0.9   —     55.4 

Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates and subsidiaries

   39.2   26.8   —     29.4   (68.3)  27.1 

Interest expense

   1.3   (55.2)  (0.5)  (0.4)  2.0   (52.8)

Other income

   0.2   6.0   —     —     (2.0)  4.2 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

   27.1   46.5   (1.3)  29.9   (68.3)  33.9 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (4.0)  6.7   (0.5)  0.6   —     2.8 

Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change

   31.1   39.8   (0.8)  29.3   (68.3)  31.1 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes

   (0.4)  (0.4)  —     —     0.4   (0.4)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net income

  $30.7  $39.4  $(0.8) $29.3  $(67.9) $30.7 
   


 


 


 


 


 



Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
  2005 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Revenues $  $725.9  $21.9  $637.1  $(32.9) $1,352.0 
Operating expenses  19.1   650.7   22.9   629.9   (32.9)  1,289.7 
                         
Operating income (loss)  (19.1)  75.2   (1.0)  7.2      62.3 
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates  127.1   1.6      (4.1)  (121.7)  2.9 
Interest income (expense)  (5.7)  (58.5)  2.4   (73.3)  1.6   (133.5)
Debt retirement costs           (4.4)     (4.4)
Foreign exchange gain           3.5      3.5 
VAT/Put settlement gain (loss), net  (9.0)        140.9      131.9 
Other income  2.2   6.3   0.1   6.3   (1.6)  13.3 
                         
Income before income taxes and minority interest  95.5   24.6   1.5   76.1   (121.7)  76.0 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (5.4)  1.7   0.2   (3.6)     (7.1)
Minority interest           (17.8)     (17.8)
                         
Net income $100.9  $22.9  $1.3  $97.5  $(121.7) $100.9 
                         

                         
  2004 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Revenues $  $635.2  $20.5  $14.1  $(30.3) $639.5 
Operating expenses  14.7   529.0   19.1   23.5   (30.3)  556.0 
                         
Operating income (loss)  (14.7)  106.2   1.4   (9.4)     83.5 
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates  35.1   (0.8)     (3.9)  (34.9)  (4.5)
Interest expense  (0.8)  (43.6)  (0.4)     0.4   (44.4)
Other income  0.3   16.3      1.4   (0.4)  17.6 
Debt retirement costs     (4.2)           (4.2)
                         
Income (loss) before income taxes  19.9   73.9   1.0   (11.9)  (34.9)  48.0 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (4.5)  31.0   0.4   (3.3)     23.6 
                         
Net income (loss) $24.4  $42.9  $0.6  $(8.6) $(34.9) $24.4 
                         

104


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
                         
  December 31, 2006 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Assets:
                        
Current assets $4.8  $253.4  $4.8  $355.8  $(12.8) $606.0 
Investments held for operating purposes and affiliate investment  1,952.3   429.9      450.8   (2,768.1)  64.9 
Property and equipment, net  0.6   1,163.7   227.9   1,060.5   (0.5)  2,452.2 
Concession assets, net           1,303.3      1,303.3 
Other assets  5.0   31.4      174.5      210.9 
                         
Total assets $1,962.7  $1,878.4  $232.7  $3,344.9  $(2,781.4) $4,637.3 
                         
Liabilities and equity:
                        
Current liabilities $353.4  $(229.5) $140.1  $386.1  $(12.7) $637.4 
Long-term debt  0.2   733.4   0.6   897.6      1,631.8 
Payables to affiliates  32.4               32.4 
Deferred income taxes  (10.4)  361.0   76.5   (9.8)     417.3 
Other liabilities  4.7   94.5   13.0   123.8   (0.3)  235.7 
Minority interest     31.4      100.3   (31.4)  100.3 
Stockholders’ equity  1,582.4   887.6   2.5   1,846.9   (2,737.0)  1,582.4 
                         
Total liabilities and equity $1,962.7  $1,878.4  $232.7  $3,344.9  $(2,781.4) $4,637.3 
                         
                         
  December 31, 2005 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Assets:
                        
Current assets $2.4  $476.1  $20.3  $233.3  $(265.3) $466.8 
Investments held for operating purposes and affiliate investment  1,715.4   435.8      464.2   (2,555.1)  60.3 
Property and equipment, net  0.1   1,334.0   239.3   724.9      2,298.3 
Concession assets, net           1,360.4      1,360.4 
Other assets  10.9   19.6   5.3   218.0   (16.0)  237.8 
                         
Total assets $1,728.8  $2,265.5  $264.9  $3,000.8  $(2,836.4) $4,423.6 
                         
Liabilities and equity:
                        
Current liabilities $202.2  $141.0  $240.2  $257.8  $(267.5) $573.7 
Long-term debt  0.2   738.1   0.6   925.0      1,663.9 
Payables to affiliates  98.1      0.7   26.6   (45.0)  80.4 
Deferred income taxes  (3.5)  424.6   (0.5)  4.5   (15.9)  409.2 
Other liabilities  5.6   110.5   14.6   139.5      270.2 
Stockholders’ equity  1,426.2   851.3   9.3   1,647.4   (2,508.0)  1,426.2 
                         
Total liabilities and equity $1,728.8  $2,265.5  $264.9  $3,000.8  $(2,836.4) $4,423.6 
                         


105

   As of December 31, 2003

   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


   (dollars in millions)

ASSETS

                        

Current assets

  $221.9  $285.3  $11.7  $15.1  $(225.9) $308.1

Investments held for operating purposes and investments in subsidiaries

   801.4   431.1   —     452.4   (1,242.2)  442.7

Properties, net

   0.2   1,358.5   3.8   —     —     1,362.5

Goodwill and other assets

   11.0   28.6   1.7   11.3   (13.0)  39.6
   

  

  

  

  


 

Total assets

  $1,034.5  $2,103.5  $17.2  $478.8  $(1,481.1) $2,152.9
   

  

  

  

  


 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

                        

Current liabilities

  $14.8  $346.7  $3.8  $35.4  $(225.9) $174.8

Long-term debt

   1.3   511.5   0.7   —     —     513.5

Payable to affiliates

   19.5   —     0.7   —     (20.2)  —  

Deferred income taxes

   3.3   398.5   0.2   2.5   (13.0)  391.5

Other liabilities

   31.9   54.4   4.3   18.8   —     109.4

Stockholders’ equity

   963.7   792.4   7.5   422.1   (1,222.0)  963.7
   

  

  

  

  


 

Total liabilities and equity

  $1,034.5  $2,103.5  $17.2  $478.8  $(1,481.1) $2,152.9
   

  

  

  

  


 

   As of December 31, 2002

   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  

Non-

Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


   (dollars in millions)

ASSETS

                        

Current assets

  $43.3  $234.7  $17.6  $13.0  $(92.4) $216.2

Investments held for operating purposes and investments in subsidiaries

   769.1   412.1   —     432.5   (1,190.6)  423.1

Properties, net

   0.2   1,333.2   3.9   0.1   —     1,337.4

Goodwill and other assets

   1.6   30.5   1.7   8.1   (9.8)  32.1
   

  

  

  

  


 

Total assets

  $814.2  $2,010.5  $23.2  $453.7  $(1,292.8) $2,008.8
   

  

  

  

  


 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

                        

Current liabilities

  $7.2  $245.3  $9.1  $16.2  $(91.5) $186.3

Long-term debt

   1.2   569.6   1.8   —     —     572.6

Payable to affiliates

   12.8   —     0.6   —     (13.4)  —  

Deferred income taxes

   8.6   391.1   0.3   2.6   (9.8)  392.8

Other liabilities

   31.5   44.7   4.0   25.1   (1.1)  104.2

Stockholders’ equity

   752.9   759.8   7.4   409.8   (1,177.0)  752.9
   

  

  

  

  


 

Total liabilities and equity

  $814.2  $2,010.5  $23.2  $453.7  $(1,292.8) $2,008.8
   

  

  

  

  


 


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
                         
  2006 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Operating activities:
                        
Excluding intercompany activity $(148.7) $225.4  $81.5  $128.0  $(18.7) $267.5 
Intercompany activity  187.7   (145.3)  (80.5)  19.4   18.7    
                         
Net cash provided  39.0   80.1   1.0   147.4      267.5 
                         
Investing activities:
                        
Capital expenditures     (93.1)     (148.7)     (241.8)
Proceeds from disposal of property     26.9      3.1      30.0 
Contribution from NS for MSLLC (net of change in restricted contribution)           79.5      79.5 
Property investments in MSLLC           (37.8)     (37.8)
Other restricted cash           (3.0)     (3.0)
Proceeds from sales of investments, net     8.2            8.2 
Investments in and loans to affiliates           (1.1)     (1.1)
                         
Net cash used     (58.0)     (108.0)     (166.0)
                         
Financing activities:
                        
Proceeds from issuance of long- term debt     410.2      206.1      616.3 
Repayment of long-term debt  (44.0)  (409.3)  (0.1)  (205.1)     (658.5)
Debt issuance costs     (7.5)     (8.4)     (15.9)
Proceeds from stock plans  8.6               8.6 
Dividends paid  (4.3)              (4.3)
Excess tax benefit realized from options exercised  .2               .2 
                         
Net cash used  (39.5)  (6.6)  (0.1)  (7.4)     (53.6)
                         
Cash and cash equivalents:
                        
Net increase (decrease)  (0.5)  15.5   0.9   32.0      47.9 
At beginning of year  0.7   20.7   (0.9)  10.6      31.1 
                         
At end of year $0.2  $36.2  $  $42.6  $  $79.0 
                         


106

   December 31, 2003

 
   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  

Non-

Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


 
   (dollars in millions) 

Net cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:

  $(130.9) $210.3  $(10.3) $3.2  $(5.0) $67.3 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Investing activities:

                         

Property acquisitions

   —     (78.6)  (0.4)  —     —     (79.0)

Proceeds from disposal of property

   —     12.4   —     —     —     12.4 

Investments in and loans to affiliates

   (41.8)  (6.1)  —     (28.6)  36.1   (40.4)

Proceeds from sale of investments

   32.7   —     —     —     —     32.7 

Repayment of loans to affiliates

   —     —     —     20.7   (20.7)  —   

Other, net

   (9.3)  (1.8)  (0.1)  (3.2)  5.1   (9.3)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net

   (18.4)  (74.1)  (0.5)  (11.1)  20.5   (83.6)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Financing activities:

                         

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   —     —     —     —     —     —   

Repayment of long-term debt

   —     (58.2)  (1.0)  —     —     (59.2)

Proceeds of loans from affiliates

   27.4   —     —     —     (27.4)  —   

Repayment of loans from affiliates

   (20.7)  —     —     —     20.7   —   

Issuance of preferred stock, net

   193.0   —     —     —     —     193.0 

Proceeds from stock plans

   5.1   0.2   —     —     —     5.3 

Cash dividends paid

   (4.7)  —     —     —     —     (4.7)

Other, net

   —     (1.7)  —     8.8   (8.8)  (1.7)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net

   200.1   (59.7)  (1.0)  8.8   (15.5)  132.7 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents:

                         

Net increase (decrease)

   50.8   76.5   (11.8)  0.9   —     116.4 

At beginning of period

   (10.8)  17.5   11.8   0.5   —     19.0 
   


 


 


 


 


 


At end of period

  $40.0  $94.0  $—    $1.4  $—    $135.4 
   


 


 


 


 


 


   December 31, 2002

 
   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  

Non-

Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


 
   (dollars in millions) 

Net cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities

  $(27.9) $99.6  $13.3  $18.7  $(8.0) $95.7 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Investing activities:

                         

Property acquisitions

   —     (79.1)  (0.7)  —     —     (79.8)

Proceeds from disposal of property

   —     18.1   —     —     —     18.1 

Investments in and loans to affiliates

   (3.0)  —     —     (13.0)  11.6   (4.4)

Proceeds from sale of investments

   1.4   31.3   —     —     (1.0)  31.7 

Other, net

   —     (1.0)  —     (8.1)  8.6   (0.5)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net

   (1.6)  (30.7)  (0.7)  (21.1)  19.2   (34.9)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Financing activities:

                         

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   —     200.0   —     —     —     200.0 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (0.4)  (269.3)  (1.0)  (0.2)  —     (270.9)

Proceeds of loans from affiliates

   8.0   —     0.2   —     (8.2)  —   

Debt issuance costs

   —     (5.7)  —     —     —     (5.7)

Proceeds from stock plans

   10.0   0.3   —     —     —     10.3 

Cash dividends paid

   (0.2)  —     —     —     —     (0.2)

Other, net

   —     —     —     3.0   (3.0)  —   
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net

   17.4   (74.7)  (0.8)  2.8   (11.2)  (66.5)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents:

                         

Net increase (decrease)

   (12.1)  (5.8)  11.8   0.4   —     (5.7)

At beginning of period

   1.3   23.2   —     0.2   —     24.7 
   


 


 


 


 


 


At end of period

  $(10.8) $17.4  $11.8  $0.6  $—    $19.0 
   


 


 


 


 


 



   December 31, 2001

 
   Parent

  KCSR

  Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  

Non-

Guarantor
Subsidiaries


  Consolidating
Adjustments


  Consolidated
KCS


 
   (dollars in millions) 

Net cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities

  $(10.0) $74.2  $(3.9) $7.1  $1.3  $68.7 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Investing activities:

                         

Property acquisitions

   —     (65.7)  (0.2)  (0.1)  —     (66.0)

Proceeds from disposal of property

   —     14.8   3.3   —     —     18.1 

Investments in and loans to affiliates

   —     (2.6)  —     (9.0)  3.4   (8.2)

Proceeds from sale of investments

   —     —     0.6   —     —     0.6 

Other, net

   —     —     0.5   —     (0.7)  (0.2)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net

   —     (53.5)  4.2   (9.1)  2.7   (55.7)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Financing activities:

                         

Proceeds from issuance of long-
term debt

   —     35.0   —     —     —     35.0 

Repayment of long-term debt

   —     (50.0)  (1.0)  (0.3)  —     (51.3)

Proceeds of loans from affiliates

   1.4   —     0.6   —     (2.0)  —   

Debt issuance costs

   —     (0.4)  —     —     —     (0.4)

Proceeds from stock plans

   8.9   —     —     —     —     8.9 

Cash dividends paid

   (0.2)  —     —     —     —     (0.2)

Other, net

   (0.3)  (1.5)  —     2.0   (2.0)  (1.8)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net

   9.8   (16.9)  (0.4)  1.7   (4.0)  (9.8)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents:

                         

Net increase (decrease)

   (0.2)  3.8   (0.1)  (0.3)  —     3.2 

At beginning of period

   1.5   19.4   0.1   0.5   —     21.5 
   


 


 


 


 


 


At end of period

  $1.3  $23.2  $—    $0.2  $—    $24.7 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
  2005 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Operating activities:
                        
Excluding intercompany activity $(1.1) $107.4  $11.3  $61.2  $  $178.8 
Intercompany activity  17.3   (14.9)  (8.9)  6.5       
                         
Net cash provided  16.2   92.5   2.4   67.7      178.8 
                         
Investing activities:
                        
Capital expenditures     (170.9)  (3.5)  (101.3)     (275.7)
Proceeds from disposal of property     5.7      0.6      6.3 
Proceeds from investment sales     (8.0)           (8.0)
Investments in and loans to affiliates  (9.9)  (16.3)     8.0   7.7   (10.5)
Acquisition costs  (10.1)              (10.1)
Cash of Mexrail at acquisition           3.0      3.0 
Cash of KCSM at acquisition           5.5      5.5 
Repayment of loans to affiliates     10.1      4.2   (14.3)   
                         
Net cash used  (20.0)  (179.4)  (3.5)  (80.0)  (6.6)  (289.5)
                         
Financing activities:
                        
Proceeds from issuance of long- term debt     20.3      624.4      644.7 
Repayment of long-term debt  (1.0)  62.7      (583.2)     (521.5)
Capital contribution           5.5   (5.5)   
Proceeds of loans from affiliates  5.2            (5.2)   
Repayment of loans from affiliates  (6.7)        (10.6)  17.3    
Debt issuance costs     (2.9)     (13.6)     (16.5)
Proceeds from stock plans  1.7               1.7 
Repurchase of common stock  (200.4)              (200.4)
Issuance of preferred stock, net proceeds  203.9               203.9 
Dividends paid  (8.7)              (8.7)
                         
Net cash provided (used)  (6.0)  80.1      22.5   6.6   103.2 
                         
Cash and cash equivalents:
                        
Net increase (decrease)  (9.8)  (6.8)  (1.1)  10.2      (7.5)
At beginning of year  10.5   27.5   0.2   0.4      38.6 
                         
At end of year $0.7  $20.7  $(0.9) $10.6  $  $31.1 
                         

107


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

                         
  2004 
        Guarantor
  Non-Guarantor
  Consolidating
  Consolidated
 
  Parent  KCSR  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Adjustments  KCS 
 
Operating activities:
                        
Excluding intercompany activity $(11.5) $156.2  $1.9  $(3.9) $  $142.7 
Intercompany activity  236.6   (239.7)  (0.2)  3.3       
                         
Net cash provided (used)  225.1   (83.5)  1.7   (0.6)     142.7 
                         
Investing activities:
                        
Capital expenditures     (116.7)  (0.5)        (117.2)
Proceeds from disposal of property     4.9            4.9 
Other restricted cash  (200.0)              (200.0)
Investments in and loans to affiliates  (41.7)  (10.5)     (9.3)  6.5   (55.0)
Proceeds from investment sales  0.4         0.1      0.5 
Repayment of loans to affiliates           8.8   (8.8)   
Other, net  (9.6)  (0.4)           (10.0)
                         
Net cash used  (250.9)  (122.7)  (0.5)  (0.4)  (2.3)  (376.8)
                         
Financing activities:
                        
Proceeds from issuance of long- term debt     250.0            250.0 
Repayment of long-term debt     (106.6)  (1.0)        (107.6)
Proceeds of loans from affiliates  6.5            (6.5)   
Repayment of loans from affiliates  (8.8)           8.8    
Debt issuance costs     (3.8)           (3.8)
Proceeds from stock plans  7.4               7.4 
Dividends paid  (8.7)              (8.7)
                         
Net cash provided (used)  (3.6)  139.6   (1.0)     2.3   137.3 
                         
Cash and cash equivalents:
                        
Net increase (decrease)  (29.4)  (66.6)  0.2   (1.0)     (96.8)
At beginning of year  39.9   94.0   0.1   1.4      135.4 
                         
At end of year $10.5  $27.4  $0.3  $0.4  $  $38.6 
                         

Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureNote 15.  Segment Reporting

The accompanying segment reporting information(in millions)has been prepared and presented pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Operating units are defined as either U.S. or Mexico segments. Appropriate eliminations of revenue and reclassifications of operating revenues and expenses have been recorded in deriving

There were no disagreements with accountants on accounting108


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

consolidated data. The U.S. segment consists primarily of KCSR and financial disclosure matters during 2003 or 2002.Tex-Mex. The Mexico segment consists of Grupo KCSM, KCSM and Arrendadora.
                 
  2006 
  U.S. ��Mexico  Elimination  Consolidated 
 
Revenue $885.7  $774.0  $  $1,659.7 
                 
Operating expenses:                
Compensation and benefits  264.3   123.4      387.7 
Purchased services  82.8   131.0   1.4   215.2 
Fuel  140.8   112.8      253.6 
Equipment costs  82.7   97.0      179.7 
Depreciation and amortization  65.7   89.3      155.0 
Casualties and insurance  44.9   8.5      53.4 
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing     5.9      5.9 
Other  78.9   27.4   (1.4)  104.9 
                 
Total operating expenses  760.1   595.3      1,355.4 
                 
Operating income $125.6  $178.7  $  $304.3 
                 
Income before income taxes and minority interest $133.5  $87.2  $(66.1) $154.6 
                 
Total assets $3,464.7  $2,465.4  $(1,292.8) $4,637.3 
Total liabilities  1,750.6   1,204.0      2,954.6 
Capital expenditures  125.7   116.1      241.8 
                 
  2005 
  U.S.  Mexico  Elimination  Consolidated 
 
Revenue $804.4  $547.6  $  $1,352.0 
                 
Operating expenses:                
Compensation and benefits  244.8   95.6      340.4 
Purchased services  84.6   108.7   1.8   195.1 
Fuel  123.8   83.1      206.9 
Equipment costs  68.9   80.9      149.8 
Depreciation and amortization  60.0   67.7      127.7 
Casualties and insurance  88.7   14.7      103.4 
KCSM employees’ statutory profit sharing     41.1      41.1 
Other  88.5   38.6   (1.8)  125.3 
                 
Total operating expenses  759.3   530.4      1,289.7 
                 
Operating income $45.1  $17.2  $  $62.3 
                 
Income before income taxes and minority interest $90.0  $85.4  $(99.4) $76.0 
                 
Total assets $3,271.2  $2,418.3  $(1,265.9) $4,423.6 
Total liabilities  1,849.4   1,215.5   (67.5)  2,997.4 
Capital expenditures  203.7   72.0      275.7 


109


Kansas City Southern
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Item 9(a).
Controls and ProceduresNote 16.  Subsequent Events

Preferred Stock Dividends.  On January 12, 2007, the Company declared a cash dividend on the Series C Preferred Stock and a stock dividend on the Series D Preferred Stock for dividends in arrears that were due May 15, 2006, August 15, 2006 and November 15, 2006, and the dividend payment due February 15, 2007. The dividends were paid on February 15, 2007, to stockholders of record on February 5, 2007. The Company also declared a cash dividend on the 4%, noncumulative Preferred Stock, payable April 3, 2007, to stockholders of record on March 12, 2007.
Consent Solicitation.  On January 29, 2007, KCSR commenced a consent solicitation to amend the indentures under which KCSR’s 91/2% Senior Notes due 2008 (“91/2% Notes”) and 71/2% Senior Notes due 2009 (“71/2% Notes”) were issued. The purpose of the consent solicitation was to (i) resolve an inconsistency in the inclusion of certain expenses, but not the income, of restricted subsidiaries in the calculation of the consolidated coverage ratio under the indentures, (ii) amend the definition of refinancing indebtedness to allow the inclusion of certain related premiums, interest, fees and expenses in permitted refinancing indebtedness and (iii) obtain waivers of any defaults arising from certain actions taken in the absence of such proposed amendments. On February 5, 2007, KCSR obtained the requisite consents from the holders of each series of Notes to amend their respective indentures as described above and executed supplemental indentures containing such amendments and waivers.
Credit Facility Waiver.  On January 31, 2007, KCS provided written notice to the lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement of certain representation and other defaults under the 2006 Credit Agreement arising from the potential defaults which existed under KCSR indentures as described above. These defaults limited KCSR’s access to the revolving credit facility. In its notice of default, the Company also requested that the lenders waive these defaults. On February 5, 2007 the Company received a waiver of such defaults from all of the lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement. The Company is currently not in default of the 2006 Credit Agreement and has access to the revolving credit facility.


110


Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-14(c)13a-15(e) and 15d-14(c)15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the fiscal year for which this annual report onForm 10-K is filed. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it filesfiled or submitssubmitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

disclosures.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any significantno changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factorscontrol over financial reporting that could significantly affect these controls subsequent tooccurred during the date of their evaluation. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesslast fiscal quarter (the fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls,control over financial reporting.
(c) Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined inRule 13a-15(f) and therefore no corrective actions were taken.

15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) is included as “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” in Item 8.

KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s financial statements contained herein, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. The attestation report is included in Item 8.
Item 9B.  Other Information
None.
Part III

The Company has incorporated by reference certain responses to the Items of this Part III pursuant toRule 12b-23 under the Exchange Act and General Instruction G(3) toForm 10-K. The Company’s definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders scheduled for May 6, 20043, 2007 (“Proxy Statement”), will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2003.

2006.
Item 10.Directors, and Executive Officers of the Companyand Corporate Governance

(a) Directors of the Company

The information set forth in response to Item 401sections of Regulation S-K under the headingCompany’s definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders entitled “Proposal 1—1 — Election of ThreeTwo Directors” and “The Board of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement isare incorporated herein by reference in partial response to this Item 10.


111


(b) Executive Officers of the Company

The information set forth in response to Item 401 of Regulation S-K under

See “Executive Officers of the Company,” an unnumbered ItemKCS and Subsidiaries” in Part I, (immediately following Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders), of this Form 10-K,annual report incorporated by reference herein for information about the executive officers of the Company.
(c) Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts
The section of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders entitled “Board Committees — The Audit Committee” is incorporated herein by reference in partial response to this Item 10.

(c)

(d) Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The information set forth in response to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy Statementdefinitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference in partial response to this Item 10.

(d)

(e) Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code(“Code of Ethics”) that applies to directors, officers (including, among others, the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions)officer) and employees. The Company has posted its Code of Ethics on its Internet website at www.kcsi.com. The Company(www.kcsouthern.com) and will also post on this Internetits website any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of its Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions as required by applicable rules and regulations.

The Code of Ethics is available, in print, upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 219335, Kansas City, Missouri64121-9335.
(f) Annual Certification to the New York Stock Exchange
KCS’ common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). As a result, the Chief Executive Officer is required to make annually, and he made on May 22, 2006, a CEO’s Annual Certification to the New York Stock Exchange in accordance with Section 303A.12 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual stating that he was not aware of any violations by KCS of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
Item 11.Executive Compensation

The information set forth in response to Item 402sections of Regulation S-K under “Management Compensation” and “The Board of Directors—Compensation of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement, (other thandefinitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders entitled “Non-Management Director Compensation, and Organization” “Compensation Committee Report, on Executive” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Management Compensation Tables,” and the Stock Performance Graph), is“Board Committees — The Compensation Committee — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” are incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 11.

Item 12.
Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The section of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information set forth in response to Item 403 of Regulation S-K under the heading “Principal Stockholders and Stock Owned Beneficially by Directors and Certain Executive Officers” in the Company’s Proxy Statementdefinitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders entitled “Beneficial Ownership” is incorporated herein by reference in partial response to this Item 12.


112


Equity Compensation Plan InformationInformation.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20032006, about ourthe common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights, as well as shares remaining available for future issuance under ourthe Company’s existing equity compensation plans.

   (a)

  (b)

  (c)

Plan category


  

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of

outstanding options,
warrants and rights


  

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rights


  Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)(1)


Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  4,612,863  $7.36  6,092,779

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  0   0  0
   
  

  

Total

  4,612,863  $7.36  6,092,779
   
  

  

             
        Number of Securities
 
        Remaining Available
 
  Number of Securities
     for Future Issuance
 
  to be Issued
  Weighted-Average
  Under Equity Compensation
 
  Upon Exercise of
  Exercise Price of
  Plans — Excluding
 
  Outstanding Options,
  Outstanding Options,
  Securities Reflected in
 
Plan Category
 Warrants and Rights  Warrants and Rights  the First Column(i) 
 
Equity compensation plans:            
Approved by security holders  2,940,332  $8.98   6,895,114 
Not approved by security holders         
             
Total  2,940,332  $8.98   6,895,114 
             
(1)
(i)Includes 4,830,7924,201,897 shares available for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In addition, includes 1,261,987Plan and 2,693,217 shares available for issuance under the 1991 Plan as awards in the form of RestrictedNonvested Shares, Bonus Shares, Performance Units or Performance Shares or issued upon the exercise of Options (including ISOs), stock appreciation rights or limited stock appreciation rights awarded under the 1991 Plan.

The Company has no knowledge of any arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information set forth in response to Item 404sections of Regulation S-K under the heading “CompensationCompany’s definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders entitled “Insider Disclosures,” “The Board of Directors — Non-Management Director Independence” and “Board Committees — The Compensation Committee — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation; Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Company’s Proxy Statement isParticipation” are incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 13.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning principal accounting fees and services under

The sections of the heading “Audit Matters—Principal Accounting Firm Fees” and “The BoardCompany’s definitive proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of Directors—Thestockholders entitled “Board Committees — the Audit Committee” in the Company’s Proxy Statement is herebyand “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” are incorporated by reference in response to this Item 14.

Part IV

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)List of Documents filed as part of this Report

(1)Financial Statements

(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements and related notes, together with the report of KPMG LLP appear in Part II Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of thisForm 10-K.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules

(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The schedules and exhibits for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission appear in Part II Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, under the “Index to Financial Statements” of thisForm 10-K.


113

(3)List of Exhibits

(a)Exhibits


(3) List of Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
The Company has attached or incorporated by reference herein certain exhibits as specified below pursuant toRule 12b-32 under the Exchange Act.
     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
   (2)  Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession
 2.1 Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2004, by and among KCS, KARA Sub, Inc., KCS Investment I, Ltd., KCS Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., Caymex Transportation, Inc., Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and Grupo Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (currently known as Grupo KCSM, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo KCSM”)) (the “Amended Acquisition Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.1.
 2.2 Stockholders’ Agreement by and among KCS, Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and certain stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.2.
 2.3 Registration Rights Agreement by and among KCS, Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and certain stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A. (the “Acquisition Registration Rights Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.3.
 2.4 Consulting Agreement by and between KCS and José F. Serrano International Business, S.A. de C.V. (the “Consulting Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.4.
 2.5 Marketing and Services Agreement by and among KCSR, TMM Logistics, S.A. de C.V. and TFM, S.A. de C.V. (currently known as Kansas City Southern de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KCSM”)) (the “Marketing and Services Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.5.
 2.6 Rights Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2005, by and between KCS and UMB Bank, n.a. (the “2005 Rights Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on October 3, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.6.
 2.7 Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 21, 2006, among Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V. (currently known as Kansas City Southern de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KCSM”)), Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Banc of America Securities LLC, BBVA Securities Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. (the “2006 Registration Rights Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on November 28, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.7.
   (3)  Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
    Articles of Incorporation
 3.1 Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement onForm S-4 originally filed July 12, 2002 (RegistrationNo. 333-92360), as amended and declared effective on July 30, 2002 (the “2002S-4 Registration Statement”), Restated Certificate of Incorporation, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1.
    Bylaws
 3.2 The Amended and Restated By-Laws of Kansas City Southern, as amended on January 18, 2007, are attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 3.2.
   (4)  Instruments Defining the Right of Security Holders, Including Indentures
 4.1 The Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh, Twelfth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Sixteenth paragraphs of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (See Exhibit 3.1).


114

(2)Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession

2.1Acquisition Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2003, by and among KCS, KARA Sub, Inc., Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to KCS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4717) is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.1
2.2Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2003 by and among KCS, Grupo TMM, S.A. and TFM, S.A. de C.V., which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to KCS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4717) is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.2
2.3Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of KCS**
2.4Form of First Amendment to Rights Agreement**
2.5Form of Stockholders’ Agreement to be entered into by and among KCS, Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and certain stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A.**
2.6Form of Registration Rights Agreement to be entered into by and among KCS, Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V.**
2.7Form of Consulting Agreement to be entered into by and between KCS and a consulting firm to be established by José Serrano Segovia**
2.8Marketing and Services Agreement to be entered into by and among KCS, Grupo TMM, S.A. and TFM, S.A. de C.V.**

**Incorporated herein by reference to Appendices A, and C through G, respectively, to KCS’s Special Meeting Preliminary Proxy Statement filed June 26, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4717), as Exhibits 2.3 through 2.8, respectively.

(3)Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

Articles of Incorporation

3.1Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 originally filed July 12, 2002 (Registration No. 333-92360), as amended and declared effective on July 30, 2002 (the “ 2002 S-4 Registration Statement”), Restated Certificate of Incorporation, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1

Bylaws

3.2The By-Laws of Kansas City Southern, as amended and restated to March 8, 2004, is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.2

(4)Instruments Defining the Right of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1The Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh, Twelfth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Sixteenth paragraphs of Exhibit 3.1 hereto are incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1
4.2Article I, Sections 1, 3 and 11 of Article II, Article V and Article VIII of Exhibit 3.2 hereto are incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2
4.3The Indenture, dated July 1, 1992 between the Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank (the “1992 Indenture”) which is attached as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Shelf Registration of $300 million of Debt Securities on Form S-3 filed June 19, 1992 (Registration No. 33-47198) and as Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Form S-3 filed March 29, 1993 (Registration No. 33-60192) registering $200 million of Debt Securities, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3
4.3.1Exhibit 4.5.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (Commission File No. 1-4717), Supplemental Indenture dated December 17, 1999 to the 1992 Indenture with respect to the 6.625% Notes Due March 1, 2005 issued pursuant to the 1992 Indenture, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3.1
4.3.2Exhibit 4.5.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (Commission File No. 1-4717), Supplemental Indenture dated December 17, 1999 to the 1992 Indenture with respect to the 7% Debentures Due December 15, 2025 issued pursuant to the 1992 Indenture, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3.2
4.4Exhibit 99 to the Company’s Form 8-A dated October 24, 1995 (Commission File No. 1-4717), which is the Stockholder Rights Agreement by and between the Company and Harris Trust and Savings Bank dated as of September 19, 1995, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4
4.5Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s S-4 Registration Statement on Form S-4 originally filed on January 25, 2001 (Registration No. 333-54262), as amended and declared effective on March 15, 2001 (the “2001 S-4 Registration Statement”), the Indenture, dated as of September 27, 2000, among the Company, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), certain other subsidiaries of the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee (the “2000 Indenture”), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5
4.5.1Exhibit 4.1.1 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the 2000 Indenture, among the Company, KCSR, certain other subsidiaries of the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5.1
4.6Form of Exchange Note (included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.5.1 hereto)
4.7Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), the Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2000, among the Company, KCSR, certain other subsidiaries of the Company, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.7

4.8The Indenture, dated June 12, 2002, among KCSR, the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the “2002 Indenture”), which is attached as Exhibit 4.1 to the 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360) is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.8
4.8.1Form of Face of Exchange Note, included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.8 and filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360) is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.8.1
4.9Certificate of Designations, which is filed as Exhibit 3.1(b) to KCS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1
4.10Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 originally filed on August 1, 2003 (Registration No. 333-107573), as amended and declared effective on October 24, 2003 (the “2003 S-3 Registration Statement”), Registration Rights Agreement dated May 5, 2003 among KCS, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.10.

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 4.2 Article I, Sections 1, 3 and 11 of Article II, Article V and Article VIII of the Company’s Bylaws. (See Exhibit 3.2).
 4.3 Indenture, dated July 1, 1992, between Kansas City Southern and The Chase Manhattan Bank (the “1992 Indenture”) filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Shelf Registration of $300 million of Debt Securities onForm S-3 filed June 19, 1992 (RegistrationNo. 33-47198) and as Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’sForm S-3 filed March 29, 2003 (RegistrationNo. 33-60192) registering $200 million of Debt Securities, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.3.
 4.3.1 Supplemental Indenture, dated December 17, 1999, with respect to the 7% Debentures Due December 15, 2025 issued pursuant to the 1992 Indenture, filed as Exhibit 4.5.4 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (File No 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.3.1.
 4.4 Indenture, dated as of September 27, 2000, among the Company, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”), certain other subsidiaries of the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (the “2000 Indenture”), filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement onForm S-4 originally filed on January 25, 2001 (RegistrationNo. 333-54262), as amended and declared effective on March 15, 2001 (the “2001S-4 Registration Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.4.
 4.4.1 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the 2000 Indenture, among the Company, KCSR, certain other subsidiaries of the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to the Company’s 2001S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-54262), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.4.1.
 4.4.2 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2005, to the 2000 Indenture, among the Company, KCSR, and certain other subsidiaries of the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.4.2.
 4.4.3 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 5, 2007, to the 2000 Indenture, among the Company, KCSR, certain other subsidiaries of the Company and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 4.4.3
 4.4.4 Form of Exchange Note (included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.4 of thisForm 10-K).
 4.5 Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2000, among the Company, KCSR, and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s 2001S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-54262), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.5.
 4.6 The Indenture, dated June 12, 2002, among KCSR, the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the “June 12, 2002 Indenture”), filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the 2002S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-92360), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.6.
 4.6.1 Form of Face of Exchange Note, included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.7 and filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the 2002S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-92360), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.6.1.
 4.6.2 Supplemental Indenture, dated June 10, 2005, to the June 12, 2002 Indenture among the Company, KCSR, and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.6.2.
 4.6.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 5, 2007, to the June 12, 2002 Indenture among the Company, KCSR, and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 4.6.3.
 4.7 Certificate of Designations of 4.25% Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, filed as Exhibit 3.1(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.7.

115

(9)Voting Trust Agreement
(Inapplicable)

(10)Material Contracts

10.1Form of Officer Indemnification Agreement which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1
10.2Form of Director Indemnification Agreement which is attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.2
10.3The 1992 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.3)
10.4.1Supplemental Indenture dated December 17, 1999 to the 1992 Indenture with respect to the 6.625% Notes Due March 1, 2005 issued pursuant to the 1992 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.3.1)
10.4.2Supplemental Indenture dated December 17, 1999 to the 1992 Indenture with respect to the 7% Debentures Due December 15, 2025 issued pursuant to the 1992 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.3.2)
10.5Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997 (Commission File No. 1-4717), The Kansas City Southern Railway Company Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan as adopted August 20, 1982 and the amendment thereto effective March 19, 1997 to such plan, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.5
10.6Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 (Commission File No. 1-4717), Description of the Company’s 1991 incentive compensation plan, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.6
10.7Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360), Directors Deferred Fee Plan, adopted August 20, 1982, amended and restated June 1, 2002, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.7
10.8Kansas City Southern 1991 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan, as amended and restated effective as of November 7, 2002 which is attached as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.8
10.9Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated October 23, 1995, by and between the Company and DST Systems, Inc., is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.9

10.10.1Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), which is attached as Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.10.1
10.10.2First Amendment to the Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), effective January 1, 2003, which is attached as Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.10.2
10.10.3Amendment to the Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated June 30, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001, is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.10.3
10.10.4Amendment to the Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated December 3, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2003, is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.10.4
10.11Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), the Assignment, Consent and Acceptance Agreement, dated August 10, 1999, by and among the Company, DST Systems, Inc. and Stilwell Financial Inc., is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.11
10.12Employment Agreement, as amended and restated January 1, 2001, by and among the Company, KCSR and Michael R. Haverty, which is attached as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.12
10.13Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 1999, by and among the Company, KCSR and Gerald K. Davies, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.13
10.13.1Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2001, by and among the Company, KCSR and Gerald K. Davies which is attached as Exhibit 10.13.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4717) is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.13.1
10.14Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2002 by and among the Company, KCSR and Ronald G. Russ, which is attached as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360) is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.14
10.14.1First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 2003, by and among the Company, KCSR, and Ronald G. Russ, which is attached as Exhibit 10.14.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.14.1
10.15Employment Agreement, dated September 1, 2001, by and between the Company, KCSR and Jerry W. Heavin, which is attached as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.15
10.15.1First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 2003, by and among the Company, KCSR and Jerry W. Heavin, which is attached as Exhibit 10.15.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.l5.1
10.16Employment Agreement, dated August 14, 2000, by and between the Company, KCSR and Larry O. Stevenson, which is attached as Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.16


10.16.1Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002, by and among the Company, KCSR and Larry O. Stevenson, which is attached as Exhibit 10.16.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.16.1
10.16.2Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 2003, by and among the Company, KCSR and Larry O. Stevenson, which is attached as Exhibit 10.16.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.16.2
10.17Employment Agreement (Amended and Restated January 1, 2001) by and between the Company and Louis G. Van Horn, which is attached as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.17
10.18Employment Agreement dated as of February 9, 2004, by and among the Company, KCSR and Mark W. Osterberg is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.18
10.19Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4717), Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. Executive Plan, as amended and restated effective November 17, 1998, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.19
10.20The Kansas City Southern Annual Incentive Plan, which is attached as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.20
10.21Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated June 12, 2002, among the Company, KCSR and the lenders named therein, together with the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 12, 2002 among the Company, KCSR and the lenders named therein attached thereto as Exhibit A, which is attached as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.21
10.21.1Reaffirmation Agreement, dated June 12, 2002, among the Company, KCSR and JP Morgan Chase Bank, which is attached as Exhibit 10.6.1 to the Company’s 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.21.1
10.21.2Master Assignment and Acceptance, dated June 12, 2002, among the Company, KCSR and the lenders named therein, which is attached as Exhibit 10.6.2 to the Company’s 2002 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92360), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.21.2
10.21.3The First Amendment, dated as of April 3, 2003, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) dated as of June 12, 2002 among the Company, KCSR, the Lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, which is attached as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.21.3
10.21.4The Second Amendment, dated as of April 28, 2003, to the Credit Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.21.3
10.22The 2000 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.5)
10.23Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the 2000 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.5.1)
10.24Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Intercompany Agreement, dated as of August 16, 1999, between the Company and Stilwell Financial Inc., is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.24

10.25Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of August 16, 1999, between the Company and Stilwell Financial Inc., is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.25
10.26Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333- 54262), Pledge Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2000, among the Company, KCSR, the subsidiary pledgors party thereto and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent (the “Pledge Agreement”), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.26
10.27Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Guarantee Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2000, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent (the “Guarantee Agreement”), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.27
10.28Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Security Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2000, among the Company, KCSR, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent (the “Security Agreement”), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.28
10.29Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Indemnity, Subrogation and Contribution Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2000, among the Company, KCSR, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent (the “Indemnity, Subrogation and Contribution Agreement”), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.29
10.30Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Supplement No. 1, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the Pledge Agreement, among PABTEX GP, LLC, SIS Bulk Holding, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.30
10.31Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Supplement No. 1, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the Guarantee Agreement, among PABTEX GP, LLC, SIS Bulk Holding, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.31
10.32Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Supplement No. 1, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the Security Agreement, among PABTEX GP, LLC, SIS Bulk Holding, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.32
10.33Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s 2001 S-4 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-54262), Supplement No. 1, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the Indemnity, Subrogation and Contribution Agreement, among PABTEX GP, LLC, SIS Bulk Holding, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Collateral Agent, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.33
10.34Lease Agreement, as amended, between The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Broadway Square Partners LLP dated June 26, 2001, which is attached as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.34
10.35The 2002 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.8)
10.36Agreement to Forego Compensation between A. Edward Allinson and the Company, fully executed on March 30, 2001; Loan Agreement between A. Edward Allinson and the Company fully executed on September 18, 2001; and the Promissory Note executed by the Trustees of The A. Edward Allinson Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated, June 4, 2001, Courtney Ann Arnot, A. Edward Allinson III and Bradford J. Allinson, Trustees, as Maker, and the Company, as Holder, which are attached as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), are hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.36

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 4.8 Registration Rights Agreement dated May 5, 2003 among KCS, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement onForm S-3 originally filed on August 1, 2003 (RegistrationNo. 333-107573), as amended and declared effective on October 24, 2003 (the “2003S-3 Registration Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.8.
 4.9 Certificate of Designations of 5.125% Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed on December 15, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.9.
 4.10 Indenture, dated as of June 16, 1997, among KCSM, Grupo TFM, S.A. de C.V.(currently known as Grupo KCSM, S.A. de C.V. (“Grupo KCSM”)), as guarantor, The Bank of New York, as trustee, and Bankers Trust Luxembourg, S.A., as a Paying Agent, covering up to $150,000,000 of TFM’s 10.25% Senior Notes due 2007 (the “1997 Indenture”), filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement onForm S-1 originally filed on November 20, 2006 (RegistrationNo. 333-138831), as amended and declared effective on December 4, 2006 (the “2006S-1 Registration Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.10.
 4.10.1 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2002, among KCSM, Grupo KCSM, as guarantor, The Bank of New York, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as the paying agent, to the 1997 Indenture, filed as Exhibit 4.11 to 2006S-1 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-138831), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.10.1.
 4.10.2 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 21, 2006, among Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V., as issuer, The Bank of New York, as trustee, Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as paying agent and Grupo KCSM, S.A. de C.V., as guarantor, to the 1997 Indenture, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on November 28, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.10.2.
 4.11 Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2002, between TFM and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, covering up to $180,000,000 of TFM’s 12.50% Senior Notes due 2012 (the “June 13, 2002 Indenture”), filed as Exhibit 4.12 to the 2006S-1 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-138831), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.11.
 4.12 Indenture, dated as of April 19, 2005, between TFM and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, covering up to $460,000,000 of TFM’s 93/8% Senior Notes due 2012 (the “2005 Indenture”), filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the 2006S-1 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-138831), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.12.
 4.13 Indenture, dated November 21, 2006, between Kansas City Southern de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and paying agent (the “2006 Indenture”), filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on November 28, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.13.
  (10)  Material Contracts
 10.1 Form of Officer Indemnification Agreement attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1.
 10.2 Form of Director Indemnification Agreement attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.2.
 10.3 Description of the Company’s 1991 incentive compensation plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.3.
 10.4 Directors Deferred Fee Plan, adopted August 20, 1982, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.4.

116

10.37Agreement to Forego Compensation between Michael G. Fitt and the Company, fully executed on March 30, 2001; Loan Agreement between Michael G. Fitt and the Company, fully executed on September 7, 2001; and the Promissory Note executed by the Trustees of The Michael G. and Doreen E. Fitt Irrevocable Insurance Trust, Anne E. Skyes, Colin M-D. Fitt and Ian D.G. Fitt, Trustees, as Maker, and the Company, as Holder, which are attached as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), are hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.37
10.38.1Kansas City Southern Employee Stock Ownership Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), which is attached as Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4717), is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.38
10.38.2Amendment to the Kansas City Southern Employee Stock Ownership Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated June 30, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001, is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.38.2
10.38.3Amendment to the Kansas City Southern Employee Stock Ownership Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated December 3, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2003, is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.38.3
10.39Placement Agreement dated April 29, 2003 by and among the Company, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., which is attached as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, is hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.39

(11)Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings


(Inapplicable)

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 10.5 Kansas City Southern 1991 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan, as amended and restated effective as of May 5, 2005 (the “Amended 1991 Plan”), filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed on May 11, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.
 10.5.1 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for employees under the Amended 1991 Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.8.2 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.1.
 10.5.2 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Directors under the Amended 1991 Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.8.3 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.2.
 10.5.3 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award agreement for employees under the Amended 1991 Plan (referencing threshold dates), filed as Exhibit 10.8.4 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.3.
 10.5.4 Form of Restricted Shares Award and Performance Shares Award Agreement under the Amended 1991 Plan, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 10.5.4.
 10.5.5 Form of Restricted Shares Award Agreement (graded vesting) under the Amended 1991 Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed on May 11, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.5.
 10.5.6 Form of Restricted Shares Award Agreement (cliff vesting) under the Amended 1991 Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sForm 8-K filed on March 18, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.6.
 10.5.7 Form of Restricted Shares Award Agreement under the Amended 1991 Plan (applicable to restricted shares to be purchased), filed as Exhibit 10.8.7 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.7.
 10.6 Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (as amended and restated, effective April 1, 2002) (the “Amended 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan”), filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.6.
 10.6.1 First Amendment to the Amended 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, effective January 1, 2003, filed as Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.6.1.
 10.6.2 Amendment to the Amended 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, dated June 30, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.10.3 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.6.2.
 10.6.3 Amendment to the Amended 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, dated December 3, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2003, filed as Exhibit 10.10.4 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.6.3.
 10.7 Assignment, Consent and Acceptance Agreement, dated August 10, 1999, by and among the Company, DST Systems, Inc. and Stilwell Financial Inc., filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s 2001S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-54262), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.7.
 10.8 Employment Agreement, as amended and restated January 1, 2001, by and among the Company, KCSR and Michael R. Haverty, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.8.
 10.9 Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2005, between KCSR and Arthur L. Shoener, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K/A filed on February 14, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.9.
 10.10 Employment Agreement, dated May 15, 2006, between KCSR and Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed on June 12, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.10.

117

(12)Statements Re Computation of Ratios

12.1The Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(12) of Regulation S-K is attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 12.1

(13)Annual Report to Security Holders, Form 10-Q or Quarterly Report to Security Holders

(Inapplicable)


(16)Letter Re Change in Certifying Accountant

(Inapplicable)

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 10.11 Employment Agreement, dated May 15, 2006, between KCSR, KCS and Daniel W. Avramovich, attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed on June 12, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.11.
 10.12 Employment Agreement, dated June 7, 2006, between KCSR and Michael K. Borrows, attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed September 15, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.12.
 10.13 Kansas City Southern Executive Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.13.
 10.14 The Kansas City Southern Annual Incentive Plan, as approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee on January 17, 2007, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 10.14.
 10.15 Security Agreement dated March 30, 2004 from KCS, KCSR and certain other subsidiaries of KCS to The Bank of Nova Scotia as Collateral Agent, filed as Exhibit 10.19.1 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.15.
 10.15.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Security Agreement among KCSR, KCS, the subsidiary guarantors, the lenders party thereto and The Bank of Nova Scotia, dated as of December 22, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on December 29, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.15.1.
 10.15.2 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated April 28, 2006 among KCSR, KCS, the subsidiary guarantors, the lenders party thereto, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Harris Bank, N.A., LaSalle Bank National Association and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Trust Company, and Scotia Capital, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.15.2.
 10.16 The 1992 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.3).
 10.16.1 The Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 1999, to the 1992 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.3.1).
 10.17 The 2000 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.4).
 10.17.1 The Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2001, to the 2000 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.4.1).
 10.17.2 The Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2005, to the 2000 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.4.2).
 10.17.3 The Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 5, 2007, to the 2000 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.4.3).
 10.18 Intercompany Agreement, dated as of August 16, 1999, between the Company and Stilwell Financial Inc., filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s 2001S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-54262), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.18.
 10.19 Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of August 16, 1999, between the Company and Stilwell Financial Inc., filed Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s 2001S-4 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-54262), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.19.
 10.20 Lease Agreement, as amended, between The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Broadway Square Partners LLP dated June 26, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.20.
 10.21 The June 12, 2002 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.6).
 10.21.2 The Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2005, to the June 12, 2002 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.6.2).
 10.21.3 The Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 5, 2007, to the June 12, 2002 Indenture (See Exhibit 4.6.3).

118

(18)Letter Re: Change in Accounting Principles


(Inapplicable)

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 10.22 Agreement to Forego Compensation between A. Edward Allinson and the Company, fully executed on March 30, 2001; Loan Agreement between A. Edward Allinson and the Company fully executed on September 18, 2001; and the Promissory Note executed by the Trustees of The A. Edward Allinson Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated, June 4, 2001, Courtney Ann Arnot, A. Edward Allinson III and Bradford J. Allinson, Trustees, as Maker, and the Company, as Holder, filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (FileNo. 1-4717), are incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.22.
 10.23 Agreement to Forego Compensation between Michael G. Fitt and the Company, fully executed on March 30, 2001; Loan Agreement between Michael G. Fitt and the Company, fully executed on September 7, 2001; and the Promissory Note executed by the Trustees of The Michael G. and Doreen E. Fitt Irrevocable Insurance Trust, Anne E. Skyes, Colin M-D. Fitt and Ian D.G. Fitt, Trustees, as Maker, and the Company, as Holder, filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (FileNo. 1-4717), are incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.23.
 10.24 Kansas City Southern Employee Stock Ownership Plan (as amended and restated, effective April 1, 2002) (the “Amended Employee Stock Ownership Plan”), filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.24.
 10.24.1 Amendment to the Amended Employee Stock Ownership Plan, dated June 30, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.38.2 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.24.1.
 10.24.2 Amendment to the Amended Employee Stock Ownership Plan, dated December 3, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2003, filed as Exhibit 10.38.3 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.24.2.
 10.25 Placement Agreement, dated April 29, 2003, by and among the Company, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.25.
 10.26 The Amended Acquisition Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.1).
 10.27 The Stockholders’ Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.2).
 10.28 The Acquisition Registration Rights Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.3).
 10.29 The Consulting Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.4).
 10.30 The Marketing and Services Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.5).
 10.31 The 2005 Rights Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.6).
 10.32 Form of Indemnity Escrow Note (as defined in the Amended Acquisition Agreement), filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.32.
 10.33 Form of VAT Escrow Note (as defined in the Amended Acquisition Agreement), filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.33.
 10.34 Closing Escrow Agreement by and among KCS, KARA Sub, Inc., KCS Investment I, Ltd., KCS Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., Caymex Transportation, Inc., Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.34.
 10.35 Indemnity Escrow Agreement by and among KCS, KARA Sub, Inc., KCS Investment I, Ltd., Caymex Transportation, Inc., Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.35.

119

(21)Subsidiaries of the Company

21.1The list of the Subsidiaries of the Company prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation S-K is attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 21.1

(22)Published Report Regarding Matters Submitted to Vote of Security Holders

(Inapplicable)


(23)Consents of Experts and Counsel

23.1The Consents of Independent Accountants prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(23) of Regulation S-K are attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 23.1

(24)Power of Attorney

(Inapplicable)

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 10.36 VAT Escrow Agreement by and among KCS, KARA Sub, Inc., KCS Investment I, Ltd., KCS Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., Caymex Transportation, Inc., Grupo TMM, S.A., TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V., TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.36.
 10.37 Consulting Compensation Escrow Agreement by and among KCS, Jose F. Serrano International Business, S.A. de C.V. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.37.
 10.38 Agreement of Assignment and Assumption of Rights, and Agency Agreement with Undisclosed Principal, Duties and Obligations, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed December 21, 2004 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.38.
 10.39 Underwriting Agreement, dated December 5, 2005, between the Company and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed December 6, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.39.
 10.40 Underwriting Agreement, dated December 5, 2005, among the Company, Grupo TMM, S.A. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed December 6, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.40.
 10.41 Transaction Agreement, dated December 1, 2005, among the Company, KCSR, Norfolk Southern Corporation and The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company (the “Transaction Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.41.
 10.41.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Transaction Agreement dated as of January 17, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.41.1.
 10.41.2 Amendment No. 2 to the Transaction Agreement dated as of May 1, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.41.2.
 10.42 Participation Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2005, among KCSR, KCSRTrust 2005-1 (acting through Wilmington Trust Company, as owner trustee) (“2005 Trust”), GS Leasing (KCSR2005-1) LLC, Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association, Export Development Canada, and KfW, filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.42.
 10.43 Equipment and Lease Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2005, by and between KCSR and the 2005 Trust, filed as Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.43.
 10.44 Participation Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2006, among KCSR, KCSRTrust 2006-1 (acting through Wilmington Trust Company, as owner trustee) (“2006 Trust”), HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch, Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association, and DVB Bank AG, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.44.
 10.45 Equipment and Lease Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2006, by and between KCSR and the 2006 Trust, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.45.
 10.46 Limited Liability Company Agreement of Meridian Speedway, LLC by and between the Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company and Kansas City Southern dated May 1, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.46.

120

(31)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1Certification of Michael R. Haverty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is attached hereto as Exhibit 31.1
31.2Certification of Ronald G. Russ, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is attached hereto as Exhibit 31.2

(32)Section 1350 Certifications

32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Michael R. Haverty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ronald G. Russ, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is attached hereto as Exhibit 32

(99)Additional Exhibits

99.1The combined and consolidated financial statements of Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (including the notes thereto and the Report of Independent Accountants thereon) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 as listed under Item 15(a)(2) herein, are hereby included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1

(b)Reports on Form 8-K


The Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 8, 2003, under Items 7 and 9 of such form, reporting the announcement of the date, time and other relevant information regarding the Company’s third quarter presentation and conference call of its financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 10.47 Underwriting Agreement, dated December 4, 2006, among the Company, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, and Grupo TMM, S.A., filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K, filed December 5, 2006 (FileNo. 1-4717), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.47.
 10.48 The 1997 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.10).
 10.48.1 The First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2002, to the 1997 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.10.1).
 10.48.2 The Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 21, 2006, to the 1997 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.10.2).
 10.49 The June 13, 2002 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.11).
 10.51 The 2006 Indenture. (See Exhibit 4.13).
 10.52 The 2006 Registration Rights Agreement. (See Exhibit 2.7).
 10.53 Credit Agreement, dated October 24, 2005, among the Company, as borrower, Arrendadora TFM, S.A. de C.V., as guarantor, Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, BBVA Bancomer, as collateral agent, and BBVA Securities, Inc. and Banc of America Securities, LLC as arrangers (the “2005 Credit Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.9 to KCSM’s Registration Statement onForm S-4 originally filed on November 8, 2005 (RegistrationNo. 333-129566), is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 10.53.
 10.53.1 Amendment No. 1 and Waiver No. 1, dated April 7, 2006, to the 2005 Credit Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to KCSM’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 10.53.1.
 10.54 Lease Agreement between KCSR and Louisiana Southern Railroad, Inc., dated September 25, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.54.
 10.55 Lease Agreement between KCSR and Alabama Southern Railroad, Inc., dated September 25, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.55.
 10.56 Lease Agreement between KCSR and Arkansas Southern Railroad, Inc., dated September 25, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.56.
 10.57 Lease Agreement between KCSR and Arkansas Southern Railroad, Inc., dated September 25, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.57.
 10.58 Lease Agreement between KCSR and Louisiana Southern Railroad, Inc., dated September 25, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’sForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.58.
  (12)  Statements Re Computation of Ratios
 12.1 The Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(12) ofRegulation S-K is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 12.1.
  (21)  Subsidiaries of the Company
 21.1 The list of the Subsidiaries of the Company prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(21) ofRegulation S-K is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 21.1.
  (23)  Consents of Experts and Counsel
 23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 23.1.
 23.2 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 23.2.
 23.3 Consent of KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C. is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 23.3.
  (24)  Power of Attorney (included on the signature page)
 31.1 Certification of Michael R. Haverty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 31.1.

121

The Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 9, 2003, under Items 7 and 9 of such form, reporting the announcement that it accepted the decision of the Surface Transportation Board to suspend the procedural schedule involving KCS’s request to gain regulatory approval of the control of The Texas-Mexican Railway Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Mexrail, Inc.


The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 23, 2003, under Items 5 and 7 of such form, reporting the announcement that Chancellor William B. Chandler III of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware had, in a ruling from the bench, stated his intention to grant KCS’s motion seeking a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo pending resolution of KCS’s dispute with Grupo TMM, S.A., and its subsidiaries TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V.

     
Exhibit
 
Description
 
 31.2 Certification of Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 31.2.
  (32)  Section 1350 Certifications
 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Michael R. Haverty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 32.1.
 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is attached to thisForm 10-K as Exhibit 32.2.
  (99)  Additional Exhibits 
 99.1 The consolidated balance sheet of Grupo TFM, S.A. de C.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004, and the consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (“Predecessor”) and the nine months ended December 31, 2005 (“Successor”) including the notes thereto and the reports of the independent registered public accounting firms thereon, attached to the 2006S-1 Registration Statement (RegistrationNo. 333-138831) as Exhibit 99.1, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 99.1.

122


The Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 27, 2003, under Items 7 and 9 of such form, reporting the announcement that its registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the resale of its 4.25% Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, and the underlying common stock, by the selling security holders of these securities had been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 3, 2003, under Items 7 and 12 of such form, reporting the announcement of KCS’s third quarter and year to date 2003 earnings and operating results.

The Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 16, 2003, under Items 7 and 9 of such form, reporting pro forma financial information of the Company that was included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 filed December 16, 2003 (“Post-Effective Amendment No. 3”) and included Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2003, Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Income Statement for the Year Ended December 31, 2002. The Company also furnished information included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 relating to the Company’s Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

The Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated December 19, 2003, under Items 7 and 9 of such form, to amend the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2003, and Exhibit 99.1 thereto, which contained a clerical error in labeling the Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 (rather than the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Kansas City Southern
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN
By:/s/  M.R. HAVERTY        

M.R.Michael R. Haverty

Chairman, President,

Chief Executive

Officer and Director

March 29, 2004

Michael R. Haverty
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer and Director
February 26, 2007
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know all people by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Michael R. Haverty and Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, and each of them, his or her true and lawfulattorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this annual report onForm 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities indicated on March 29, 2004.

February 26, 2007.

Signature


 

Capacity


Signature
Capacity

/s/  Michael R. Haverty
/S/    M.R. HAVERTY        


M.R.

Michael R. Haverty

 Chairman President, of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer and Director

/S/    G.K. DAVIES        


G.K. Davies

 Executive Vice
/s/  Arthur L. Shoener

Arthur L. Shoener
KCS President and
Chief Operating Officer and Director

/s/  Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
/S/    R.G. RUSS        


R.G. Russ

Patrick J. Ottensmeyer
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/  Michael K. Borrows
/S/    M.W. OSTERBERG        


M.W. Osterberg

Michael K. Borrows
 Vice President Financial Reporting and Comptroller (PrincipalTax
(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/  A. Edward Allinson
/S/    A.E. ALLINSON        


A.E.

A. Edward Allinson

 Director

/s/  Robert J. Druten
/S/    M.G. FITT        


M.G. Fitt

Robert J. Druten
 Director

/s/  James R. Jones

James R. Jones
Director


123


Signature
Capacity
/S/    J.R. JONES        s/  Thomas A. McDonnell


J.R. Jones

Thomas A. McDonnell
 Director

/s/  Karen L. Pletz
/S/    T.A. MCDONNELL        


T.A. McDonnell

Karen L. Pletz
 Director

/S/    K.L. PLETZ        


K.L. Pletz

 Director

/s/  Rodney E. Slater
L.H. Rowland

Director

/S/    R.E. SLATER        


R.E.

Rodney E. Slater

Director

/S/    B.G. THOMPSON        


B.G. Thompson

 Director


124

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN


2003 FORMKansas City Southern
2006Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT Annual Report
Index to Exhibits
         
    Regulation S-K
    Item 601(b)
Exhibit
 
Document
 
Exhibit
 
 2.7 Registration Rights Agreement  2 
 3.2 Amended and Restated By-Laws of Kansas City Southern  3 
 4.4.3 Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2000 Indenture  4 
 4.6.3 Second Supplemental Indenture to the June 12, 2002 Indenture  4 
 10.5.4 Form of Restricted Shares Award and Performance Shares Award Agreement under the Amended 1991 Plan  10 
 10.14 Kansas City Southern Annual Incentive Plan  10 
 10.53 The 2005 Credit Agreement  10 
 10.53.1 Amendment No. 1 and Waiver No. 1, dated April 7, 2006, to the 2005 Credit Agreement  10 
 12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  12 
 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company  21 
 23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP  23 
 23.2 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers  23 
 23.3 Consent of KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C.  23 
 31.1 Certification of Michael R. Haverty pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
  31 
 31.2��Certification of Patrick J. Ottensmeyer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  31 
 32.1 Certification of Michael R. Haverty pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.  32 
 32.2 Certification of Patrick J. Ottensmeyer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  32 
The above exhibits are not included in thisForm 10-K, but are
on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission


125

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.

  

Document


  Regulation S-K
Item 601(b)
Exhibit No.


  3.2  The By-Laws of Kansas City Southern, as amended and restated to March 8, 2004  3
10.10.3  Amendment to the Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated June 30, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001  10
10.10.4  Amendment to the Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated December 3, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001  10
10.18  Employment Agreement dated as of February 9, 2004 by and among the Company, KCSR and Mark W. Osterberg  10
10.38.2  Amendment to the Kansas City Southern Employee Stock Ownership Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated June 30, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2001  10
10.38.3  Amendment to the Kansas City Southern Employee Stock Ownership Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002), dated December 3, 2003 and effective as of January 1, 2003  10
12.1  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  12
21.1  Subsidiaries of the Company  21
23.1  Consents of Independent Accountants  23
31.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002—Michael R. Haverty  31
31.2  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002—Ronald G. Russ  31
32.1  Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002—Michael R. Haverty and Ronald G. Russ  32
99.1  Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. combined and consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003  99


119