UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 200428, 2007

ORor

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 1-13881

 


 

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware 52-2055918

(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)

incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification Number)No.)

10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code (301) 380-3000


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class


 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered


Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value

(225,768,576354,043,159 shares outstanding as of February 10, 2005)January 25, 2008)

 

New York Stock Exchange

Chicago Stock Exchange

Pacific Stock Exchange

Philadelphia Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure by delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)Act).    Yes  x¨    No  x¨

The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates at June 18, 2004,15, 2007, was $8,908,154,899.

$13,599,596,837.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement prepared for the 20052008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by

reference into

Part III of this report.

 


MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FORM 10-K TABLE OF CONTENTS

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 200428, 2007

 

      Page No.

Part I.

    

    Items 1 and 2.Item 1.

  

Business and Properties

  3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

15

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

19

Item 2.

Properties

19

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

  1619

Item 4.

  

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  1719

Part II.

    

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  1820

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

  1921

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  2022

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  4058

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  4260

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  77105

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

  77105

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

  77105

Part III.

    

Item 10.

  

Directors, and Executive Officers of the Registrantand Corporate Governance

  78106

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

  78106

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  78106

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  78106

Item 14.

  

Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services

  78106

Part IV.

    

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

  82110
  

Signatures

  85113

Throughout this report, we refer to Marriott International, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, as “we,” “us,” or “the Company.” Unless otherwise specified, each reference to a particular year means the fiscal year ended on the date shown in the table below, rather than the corresponding calendar year:

 

Fiscal Year

  

Fiscal Year-end Date

  Fiscal Year  

Fiscal Year-end Date

2007  December 28, 2007  2003  January 2, 2004
2006  December 29, 2006  2002  January 3, 2003
2005  December 30, 2005  2001  December 28, 2001
2004  December 31, 2004  2000  December 29, 2000

PART I

 

Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties.

Item 1.Business.

We are a worldwide operator and franchisor of hotels and related lodging facilities. Our operations are grouped into the following five business segments:

Segment


Percentage of Total Sales in
the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2004


Full-Service Lodging

66%

Select-Service Lodging

11%

Extended-Stay Lodging

5%

Timeshare

15%

Synthetic Fuel

3%

We were organized as a corporation in Delaware in 1997 and became a public company in 1998 when we were “spun off” as a separate entity by the company formerly named “Marriott International, Inc.” Our operations are grouped into the following five business segments:

 

Segment

Percentage of 2007
Total Revenues

North American Full-Service Lodging Segment

42%

North American Limited-Service Lodging Segment

17%

International Lodging Segment

12%

Luxury Lodging Segment

12%

Timeshare Segment

16%

Other unallocated corporate

  1%

InPrior to November 3, 2007, our Lodgingoperations also included our synthetic fuel business, which we now classify as discontinued operations.

Our business includes our North American Full-Service, Select-Service, Extended-StayNorth American Limited-Service, International, Luxury, and Timeshare segments, wesegments. We develop, operate, and franchise hotels and corporate housing properties under 1315 separate brand names, and we develop, operate, and market Marriott timeshare, fractional ownership, and residential properties under four separate brand names.

Our synthetic fuel operation consists We also provide services to home/condominium owner associations for projects associated with several of our interest in four coal-based synthetic fuel production facilities whose operations qualify for tax credits based on Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Prior to January 3, 2003, our operations included our Senior Living Services and Distribution Services businesses, which we now classify as discontinued operations.

brands.

Financial information by industry segment and geographic area as of December 31, 2004, and for the three2007, 2006, and 2005 fiscal years then ended appears in Footnote No. 19, “Business Segments,” of the Business Segments noteNotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report.

Lodging

We operate or franchise 2,6322,999 lodging properties worldwide, with 482,186535,093 rooms as of December 31, 2004.year-end 2007 inclusive of 21 home and condominium products (1,916 units) for which we manage the related owners’ associations. In addition, we provide 2,504provided 2,156 furnished corporate housing rental units.units, which are not included in the totals. We believe that our portfolio of lodging brands is the broadest of any company in the world and that we are the leader in the quality tier of the vacation timesharing business. Consistent with our focus on management and franchising, we own very few of our lodging properties. OurWe manage and franchise lodging brands include:

Full-Service Lodgingproperties employing the following brands:

 

North American Full-Service Lodging Segment  International Lodging Segment

•   Marriott® Hotels & Resorts

  

•   Marriott Conference Centers®

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts

JW MarriottThe Ritz-Carlton®

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

  

•   BulgariJW Marriott® Hotels & Resorts

Select-Service

•   Renaissance® Hotels & Resorts

•   Renaissance® Hotels & Resorts

•   Renaissance ClubSport®

•   Courtyard by Marriott®

•   Fairfield Inn by Marriott®

North American Limited-Service Lodging Segment

•   Residence Inn by Marriott®

•   Courtyard by Marriott®(“Courtyard”)

•   Marriott Executive Apartments®

•   Fairfield Inn by Marriott®(“Fairfield Inn”)

•   SpringHill Suites by Marriott® (“SpringHill Suites”)

•   Residence Inn by Marriott®(“Residence Inn”)

  CourtyardTimeshare Segment

TownePlace Suites by Marriott®(“TownePlace Suites”)

  

Fairfield Inn

SpringHill Suites

Extended-Stay Lodging

Residence Inn

TownePlace Suites

Marriott ExecuStay

Marriott Executive Apartments

Timeshare

Marriott Vacation Club InternationalSM

Marriott ExecuStay®

  

•   The Ritz-Carlton Club®

  

•   Marriott Grand Residence ClubResidences by Marriott®

Luxury Segment  

•   Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club International®

•   The Ritz-Carlton®

•   Bulgari Hotels & Resorts®

The North American Full-Service segment and the North American Limited-Service segment include properties located in the continental United States and Canada. The Luxury segment includes worldwide properties. The International segment includes full-service and limited-service properties located outside the continental United States and Canada. Unless otherwise indicated, our references to Marriott Hotels & Resorts throughout this report include Marriott Conference Centers and JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, references to Renaissance Hotels & Resorts include Renaissance ClubSport, and references to Fairfield Inn include Fairfield Inn & Suites.

In addition to the brands noted above, in 2007 we announced our new brand of family-friendly resorts and spas, “Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott” and a new brand of lifestyle boutique hotels, “Edition.” At year-end 2007, no properties were yet open under either brand.

Company-Operated Lodging Properties

At December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, we operated 9681,040 properties (255,109(266,751 rooms) under long-term management oragreements with property owners, 31 properties (7,729 rooms) under long-term lease agreements with property owners (together,(management and lease agreements together, “the Operating Agreements”), and six properties (1,362(1,316 rooms) as owned.

The figures noted for properties operated under long-term management agreements include 21 residential products (1,916 units) for which we manage the related owners’ associations.

Terms of our management agreements vary, but typically we earn a management fee, which comprises a base management fee, which is a percentage of the revenues of the hotel and an incentive management fee, which is based on the profits of the hotel. Our management agreements also typically include reimbursement of costs (both direct and indirect) of operations. Such agreements are generally for initial periods of 20 to 30 years, with options to renew for up to 50 or more additional years. Our lease agreements also vary, but typicallymay include fixed annual rentals plus additional rentals based on a percentage of annual revenues in excess of a fixed amount. Many of the Operating Agreements are subordinated to mortgages or other liens securing indebtedness of the owners. Additionally, mostmany of theour Operating Agreements permit the owners to terminate the agreement if certain performance metrics are not met and financial returns fail to meet defined levels for a period of time and we have not cured such deficiencies.

For lodging facilities that we operate, we generally are responsible for hiring, training, and supervising the managers and employees required to operate the facilities and for purchasing supplies, both for which we generally are reimbursed by the owners. We provide centralized reservation services and national advertising, marketing and promotional services, as well as various accounting and data processing services. We are generally reimbursed by owners for the cost of providing these services.

Franchised Lodging Properties

We have franchising programs that permit the use of certain of our brand names and our lodging systems by other hotel owners and operators. Under these programs, we generally receive an initial application fee and continuing royalty fees, which typically range from 4 percent to 6 percent of room revenues for all brands, plus 2 percent to 3 percent of food and beverage revenues for certain full-service hotels. In addition, franchisees contribute to our national marketing and advertising programs and pay fees for use of our centralized reservation systems. At December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, we had 1,6581,922 franchised properties (225,715(259,297 rooms).

Summary of Properties by Brand

As of December 31, 2004, we operated or franchised the following properties by brand (excluding 2,504 corporate housing rental units):

   Company-Operated

  Franchised

Brand


  Properties

  Rooms

  Properties

  Rooms

Full-Service Lodging

            

Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  226  100,780  216  59,764

Marriott Conference Centers

  14  3,577  —    —  

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  30  13,833  4  1,205

The Ritz-Carlton

  57  18,611  —    —  

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

  88  33,596  45  13,863

Bulgari Hotel & Resort

  1  58  —    —  

Ramada International

  4  727  —    —  

Select-Service Lodging

            

Courtyard

  299  47,344  357  46,659

Fairfield Inn

  2  855  521  47,855

SpringHill Suites

  23  3,597  102  10,953

Extended-Stay Lodging

            

Residence Inn

  132  17,791  331  37,268

TownePlace Suites

  34  3,661  81  8,049

Marriott Executive Apartments

  13  2,372  1  99

Timeshare

            

Marriott Vacation Club International

  43  8,832  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton Club

  4  261  —    —  

Marriott Grand Residence Club

  2  248  —    —  

Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club International

  2  328  —    —  
   
  
  
  

Total

  974  256,471  1,658  225,715
   
  
  
  

We currently have more than 55,000 rooms in our development pipelineTimeshare and expect to add 25,000 to 30,000 hotel rooms and timeshare units to our system in 2005. We believe that we have access to sufficient financial resources to finance our growth, as well as to support our ongoing operations and meet debt service and other cash requirements. Nonetheless, our ability to sell properties that we develop, and the ability of hotel developers to build or acquire new

Marriott properties, important parts of our growth plan, are partially dependent on their access to and the availability and cost of capital. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” caption in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Summary of Properties by CountryResidential

As of December 31, 2004, we operated or franchised properties in the following 66 countries and territories:

Country


  Hotels

  Rooms

Americas

      

Argentina

  1  325

Aruba

  4  1,586

Brazil

  5  1,506

Canada

  42  9,850

Cayman Islands

  2  532

Chile

  2  485

Costa Rica

  3  574

Curacao

  1  247

Dominican Republic

  2  446

Ecuador

  1  257

Guatemala

  1  385

Honduras

  1  157

Jamaica

  1  427

Mexico

  9  2,583

Panama

  2  416

Peru

  1  300

Puerto Rico

  3  1,197

Saint Kitts and Nevis

  1  500

Trinidad and Tobago

  1  119

United States

  2,264  385,845

U.S. Virgin Islands

  3  785

Venezuela

  1  269
   
  

Total Americas

  2,351  408,791

Middle East and Africa

      

Armenia

  1  225

Bahrain

  1  264

Egypt

  7  3,141

Israel

  2  960

Jordan

  3  609

Kuwait

  2  601

Lebanon

  1  174

Qatar

  2  586

Saudi Arabia

  3  735

Tunisia

  1  221

Turkey

  4  1,189

United Arab Emirates

  4  935
   
  

Total Middle East and Africa

  31  9,640

Asia

      

China

  30  11,493

Guam

  1  357

India

  5  1,195

Indonesia

  3  1,083

Japan

  9  2,875

Malaysia

  6  2,757

Pakistan

  2  509

Philippines

  2  898

Singapore

  2  992

South Korea

  4  1,762

Thailand

  7  1,887

Vietnam

  2  874
   
  

Total Asia

  73  26,682

Country


  Hotels

  Rooms

Australia

  8  2,354

Europe

      

Austria

  6  1,569

Belgium

  4  721

Czech Republic

  3  656

Denmark

  1  395

France

  6  1,431

Georgia

  2  245

Germany

  40  8,512

Greece

  1  314

Hungary

  2  470

Italy

  5  944

Netherlands

  3  945

Poland

  2  748

Portugal

  3  933

Romania

  1  402

Russia

  6  1,559

Spain

  6  1,398

Switzerland

  2  464
   
  

Total Europe

  93  21,706

United Kingdom

      

Ireland

  3  506

United Kingdom (England, Scotland and Wales)

  73  12,507
   
  

Total United Kingdom

  76  13,013
   
  

Total – All Countries and Territories

  2,632  482,186
   
  

Full-Service Lodging

Marriott Hotels & Resorts (including JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts and Marriott Conference Centers) is our global flagship brand, primarily serving business and leisure travelers and meeting groups at locations in downtown, urban and suburban areas, near airports and at resort locations. Marriott full-service hotels is a quality tier brand, with most hotels typically containing from 400 to 700 rooms, high-speed internet access, swimming pools, gift shops, convention and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, room service, concierge lounges and parking facilities. Fifteen hotels have over 1,000 rooms. Many Marriott resort hotels have additional recreational and entertainment facilities, such as tennis courts, golf courses, additional restaurants and lounges, and many have spa facilities. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new, superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components). Unless otherwise indicated, our references to Marriott Hotels & Resorts throughout this report include JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts and Marriott Conference Centers.

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts is the Marriott brand’s luxury collection of distinctive hotels that cater to accomplished, discerning travelers seeking an elegant environment and personal service. These 34 hotels and resorts are primarily located in gateway cities and upscale locations throughout the world. In addition to the features found in a typical Marriott full-service hotel, the facilities and amenities at JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts normally include larger guest rooms, higher end décor and furnishings, upgraded in-room amenities, upgraded business centers and fitness centers/spas, and 24-hour room service.

We develop, operate, 14Marriott Conference Centers (3,577 rooms) throughout the United States. Some of the centers are used exclusively by employees of sponsoring organizations, while others are marketed to outside meeting groupsmarket, and individuals. In addition to the features found in a typical Marriott full-service hotel, the centers typically include expanded meeting room space, banquetsell timeshare interval, fractional ownership, and dining facilities, guest rooms and recreational facilities.

Rooms revenue contributed the majority of Marriott Hotels & Resorts’ revenues for fiscal year 2004, with the remainder coming from food and beverage operations, recreational facilities and other services. Overall hotel system profits are usually relatively stable and include only moderate seasonal fluctuations. Business at resortresidential properties may be seasonal depending on location.

Marriott Hotels & Resorts

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


Hotels

United States (43 states and the District of Columbia)

318

(129,831 rooms)

Non-U.S. (51 countries and territories)

Americas (Non-U.S.)

34

Continental Europe

32

United Kingdom

55

Asia

30

The Middle East and Africa

16

Australia

  5

Total Non-U.S.

172(49,328 rooms)

The Ritz-Carlton is a leading global luxury brand of hotels and resorts renowned for their distinctive architecture and for the high quality level of their facilities, dining options and exceptional personalized guest service. Most Ritz-Carlton hotels have 250 to 400 guest rooms and typically include meeting and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, a club level, gift shops, high-speed internet access, swimming pools and parking facilities. Guests at most of the Ritz-Carlton resorts have access to additional recreational amenities, such as tennis courts, golf courses and health spas.

The Ritz-Carlton

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


Hotels

United States (16 states and the District of Columbia)

35(11,629 rooms)

Non-U.S. (20 countries and territories)

Americas (Non-U.S.)

6

Continental Europe

4

Asia

7

The Middle East and Africa

5

Total Non-U.S.

22(6,982 rooms)

Renaissance Hotels & Resortsis a distinctive and global quality-tier brand that targets individual business and leisure travelers and group meetings seeking stylish and personalized environments. Renaissance hotels are generally located at downtown locations in major cities, in suburban office parks, near major gateway airports and in destination resorts. Most hotels contain from 300 to 500 rooms; however, a few of the convention oriented hotels are larger, and some hotels in non-gateway markets, particularly in Europe, are smaller. Renaissance products and services typically include stylish décor, high-speed internet access, restaurants and lounges, room service, swimming pools, gift shops, concierge lounges, and meeting and banquet facilities. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new, superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components). Renaissance resort properties have additional recreational and entertainment facilities and services, including golf courses, tennis courts, water sports, additional restaurants and spa facilities.

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


Hotels

United States (26 states and the District of Columbia)

67(25,473 rooms)

Non-U.S. (27 countries and territories)

Americas (Non-U.S.)

8

Continental Europe

21

United Kingdom

8

Asia

21

The Middle East and Africa

8

Total Non-U.S.

66(21,986 rooms)

Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.As part of our ongoing strategy to expand our reach through partnerships with pre-eminent world-class companies, in early 2001 we entered into a joint venture with Bulgari SpA to create and introduce distinctive new luxury hotel properties in prime locations – Bulgari Hotels & Resorts. The first property (58 rooms), the Bulgari Hotel Milano, opened in Milan, Italy, in May 2004. The second property announced is the Bulgari Resort Bali, currently under construction and scheduled to open in late 2005. Other projects are currently in various stages of development in Europe, Asia, and North America.

Ramada International. We sold Ramada International, a moderately-priced and predominantly franchised brand targeted at business and leisure travelers outside the United States, to Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) during the fourth quarter of 2004. We continue to manage four Ramada International properties (727 rooms) located outside of the United States at December 31, 2004. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2004, Cendant exercised its option to redeem our interest in the Two Flags joint venture, and as a result, Cendant acquired the trademarks and licenses for

the Ramada and Days Inn lodging brands in the United States. The Two Flags joint venture was originally formed in 2002 by us and Cendant to further develop and expand the Ramada and Days Inn brands in the United States. We contributed the domestic Ramada license agreements and related intellectual property to the joint venture, and Cendant contributed the Days Inn license agreement and related intellectual property.

Select-Service Lodging

Courtyard is our upper-moderate-price select-service hotel product. Aimed at individual business and leisure travelers as well as families, Courtyard hotels maintain a residential atmosphere and typically contain 90 to 150 rooms. Well landscaped grounds typically include a courtyard with a pool and social areas. Most hotels feature functionally designed quality guest rooms and meeting rooms, free in-room high-speed internet access, limited restaurant facilities, a swimming pool and an exercise room. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new, superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components), and most hotels will also haveThe Market (a self-serve food store open 24 hours a day). In addition, our Courtyard brand is undergoing a reinvention strategy designed to meet the evolving needs of the business traveler. Reinvented Courtyards feature fresh, crisp designs for guest rooms and public spaces and 24-hour food availability. Through year-end 2004, 87 hotels have been reinvented, and reinventions of an additional 71 properties are expected to be completed by year-end 2005. The operating systems developed for these hotels allow Courtyard to be price-competitive while providing better value through superior facilities and guest service. At year-end 2004, there were 656 Courtyards operating in 21 countries.

Courtyard

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


Hotels

United States (45 states and the District of Columbia)

595(83,285 rooms)

Non-U.S. (20 countries and territories)

Americas (Non-U.S.)

17

Continental Europe

24

United Kingdom

11

Asia

5

The Middle East and Africa

1

Australia

3

Total Non-U.S.

61(10,718 rooms)

Fairfield Inn is our hotel brand that competes in the lower-moderate-price tier. Aimed at value-conscious individual business and leisure travelers, a typical Fairfield Inn or Fairfield Inn & Suites has 60 to 140 rooms and offers free in-room high-speed internet access, a swimming pool, complimentary continental breakfast and free local phone calls. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new, superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components). At year-end 2004, there were 409 Fairfield Inns and 114 Fairfield Inn & Suites (523 hotels total), operating in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Fairfield Inn

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


Hotels

United States (49 states and the District of Columbia)

519(48,258 rooms)

Non-U.S. (2 countries)

Americas (Non-U.S.)

4(452 rooms)

SpringHill Suitesis our all-suite brand in the upper-moderate-price tier targeting business travelers, leisure travelers and families. SpringHill Suites typically have 90 to 165 studio suites that are 25 percent larger than a typical hotel guest room. The brand offers a broad range of amenities, including free in-room high-speed internet access, complimentary hot breakfast buffet and exercise facilities. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components). In 2005, the brand will introduceThe Market(a self-serve food store open 24 hours a day). There were 125 properties (14,550 rooms) located in the United States and Canada at December 31, 2004.

Extended-Stay Lodging

Residence Inn, North America’s leading extended-stay brand, allows guests on long-term trips to maintain balance between work and life while away from home. Spacious suites with full kitchens and separate areas for sleeping, working, relaxing and eating offer home-like comfort with functionality. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new, superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components). A friendly staff and welcome services like complimentary hot breakfast and evening social hours add to the sense of community. There are 463 Residence Inn hotels across North America.

Residence Inn

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


Hotels

United States (47 states and the District of Columbia)

449(53,172 rooms)

Non-U.S. (2 countries)

Americas (Non-U.S.)

14(1,887 rooms)

TownePlace Suitesis a moderately priced extended-stay hotel product that is designed to appeal to business and leisure travelers who stay for five nights or more. The typical TownePlace Suites hotel contains 100 studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom suites. Each suite has a fully equipped kitchen and separate living area with a comfortable, residential feel. Each hotel provides housekeeping services and has on-site exercise facilities, an outdoor pool, 24-hour staffing, free in-room high-speed internet access and laundry facilities. By the end of 2005, hotels are required to have a new, superior bedding package (offering better mattress quality and enhanced bedding components). At December 31, 2004, 115 TownePlace Suites (11,710 rooms) were located in 35 states.

Marriott ExecuStayprovides furnished corporate apartments for stays of one month or longer nationwide. ExecuStay owns no residential real estate and provides units primarily through short-term lease agreements with apartment owners and managers and franchise agreements. Consistent with our plan to shift the business toward franchising, the total number of units leased by ExecuStay decreased and more than 20 franchise markets were added during 2004. At December 31, 2004, Marriott ExecuStay’s franchise program, launched in July 2002, included 14 franchisees covering 35 U.S. markets.

Marriott Executive Apartments.We provide temporary housing (“Serviced Apartments”) for business executives and others who need quality accommodations outside their home country, usually for 30 or more days. Some Serviced Apartments operate under theMarriott Executive Apartmentsbrand, which is designed specifically for the long-term international traveler. At December 31, 2004, four Serviced Apartments properties and 10 Marriott Executive Apartments (2,471 rooms total) were located in nine countries and territories. All Marriott Executive Apartments are located outside the United States.

Timeshare

Marriott Vacation Club Internationaldevelops, sells and operates vacation timesharing resorts under four brands. Revenues are generatedbrand names and generate revenues from three primary sources: (1) selling fee simple and other forms of timeshare intervals and personal residences; (2) financing consumer purchases of timesharing intervals,purchases; and (3) operating the resorts.

Many timesharing resorts are located adjacent to Marriott-operatedcompany-operated hotels, such as Marriott Hotels & Resorts and timeshareThe Ritz-Carlton, and owners have access to certain hotel facilities during their vacation. Owners can trade their annual interval for intervals at other Marriott timesharing resorts or for intervals at certain timesharing resorts not otherwise sponsored by Marriott through a third-party exchange company. Owners can also trade their unused interval for points in the Marriott Rewards® frequent stay program, enabling them to stay at over 2,500 Marriott2,900 company-operated or franchised properties worldwide.

We sell residential real estate in conjunction with luxury hotel development (Ritz-Carlton-Residential) and Timeshare segment projects (Ritz-Carlton Club-Residential and Grand Residences by Marriott-Residential). Our Timeshare segment residential projects are typically opened over time with limited inventory available at any one time. Residences developed in conjunction with hotels worldwide.are typically constructed and sold by hotel owners with limited amounts, if any, of our capital at risk. While the worldwide residential market is very large, the luxurious nature of our residential properties, the quality and exclusivity associated with our brands, and the hospitality services that we provide, all serve to make our residential products distinctive.

Seasonality

In general, business at company-operated and franchised properties is relatively stable and includes only moderate seasonal fluctuations. Business at some resort properties may be seasonal depending on location.

Relationship with Major Customer

We operate a number of properties under long-term management agreements that are owned or leased by Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (“Host”). In addition, Host is a partner in several partnerships that own properties operated by us under long-term management agreements. See Footnote No. 22, “Relationship with Major Customer,” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for more information.

Summary of Properties by Brand

At year-end 2007, we operated or franchised the following properties by brand (excluding 2,156 corporate housing rental units):

 

   Company-Operated  Franchised

Brand

  Properties  Rooms  Properties  Rooms

U.S. Locations

        

Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  146  73,937  167  50,647

Marriott Conference Centers

  13  3,476  —    —  

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  11  6,736  5  1,552

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

  36  16,198  34  9,744

Renaissance ClubSport

  —    —    1  175

The Ritz-Carlton

  36  11,627  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton-Residential(1)

  16  1,614  —    —  

Courtyard

  272  42,429  421  54,330

Fairfield Inn

  2  855  527  46,075

SpringHill Suites

  24  3,700  152  16,745

Residence Inn

  138  18,693  390  44,112

TownePlace Suites

  34  3,661  107  10,461

Marriott Vacation Club(2)

  37  8,987  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton Club-Fractional(2)

  5  283  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton Club-Residential(1), (2)

  2  138  —    —  

Grand Residences by Marriott-Fractional(2)

  1  199  —    —  

Grand Residences by Marriott-Residential(1), (2)

  1  65  —    —  

Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club(2)

  2  444  —    —  

Non-U.S. Locations

        

Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  122  34,016  34  9,936

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  21  8,183  1  61

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

  53  17,493  17  5,324

The Ritz-Carlton

  34  9,978  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton-Residential(1)

  1  93  —    —  

Bulgari Hotels & Resorts

  2  117  —    —  

Marriott Executive Apartments

  17  2,806  1  99

Courtyard

  35  7,477  39  6,544

Fairfield Inn

  —    —    8  947

SpringHill Suites

  —    —    1  124

Residence Inn

  1  190  17  2,421

Ramada International

  2  332  —    —  

Marriott Vacation Club(2)

  9  1,909  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton Club-Fractional(2)

  2  105  —    —  

The Ritz-Carlton Club-Residential(1), (2)

  1  6  —    —  

Grand Residences by Marriott-Fractional(2)

  1  49  —    —  
            

Total

  1,077  275,796  1,922  259,297
            

(1)

Represents projects where we manage the related owners association. Residential products are included once they possess a certificate of occupancy.

(2)

Indicates a Timeshare product. Includes products in active sales as well as those that are sold out.

The following table provides additional detail by brand as of year-end 2007, for our Timeshare properties:

   Total
Properties (1)
  Properties in
Active Sales (2)

100 Percent Company-Developed

    

Marriott Vacation Club

  45  24

The Ritz-Carlton Club and Residences

  6  4

Grand Residences by Marriott and Residences

  3  3

Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club

  2  2

Joint Ventures

    

Marriott Vacation Club

  1  1

The Ritz-Carlton Club and Residences

  4  4
      

Total

  61  38
      

(1)

Includes products that are in active sales as well as those that are sold out. Residential products are included once they possess a certificate of occupancy.

(2)

Products in active sales may not be ready for occupancy.

Summary of Properties by Country

At year-end 2007, we operated or franchised properties in the following 68 countries and territories:

Country

  Properties (1)  Rooms (1)

Americas

    

Argentina

  1  320

Aruba

  4  1,637

Bahamas

  1  6

Brazil

  6  1,609

Canada

  56  11,838

Cayman Islands

  4  929

Chile

  2  485

Costa Rica

  3  620

Curacao

  1  247

Dominican Republic

  3  583

Ecuador

  1  257

El Salvador

  1  133

Guatemala

  1  385

Honduras

  1  153

Jamaica

  1  427

Mexico

  16  3,833

Panama

  2  415

Peru

  1  300

Puerto Rico

  5  1,585

Saint Kitts and Nevis

  2  559

Trinidad and Tobago

  1  119

United States

  2,580  426,883

U.S. Virgin Islands

  5  862

Venezuela

  1  269
      

Total Americas

  2,699  454,454

Country

  Properties (1)  Rooms (1)

Middle East and Africa

    

Armenia

  1  226

Bahrain

  1  264

Egypt

  8  3,562

Israel

  2  966

Jordan

  3  644

Kuwait

  2  604

Qatar

  3  910

Saudi Arabia

  3  749

Tunisia

  1  227

Turkey

  5  1,470

United Arab Emirates

  6  1,150
      

Total Middle East and Africa

  35  10,772

Asia

    

China

  32  12,465

Guam

  1  357

India

  6  1,525

Indonesia

  8  1,808

Japan

  10  3,155

Malaysia

  7  3,019

Pakistan

  2  504

Philippines

  2  899

Singapore

  2  1,002

South Korea

  4  1,501

Thailand

  9  2,330

Vietnam

  2  874
      

Total Asia

  85  29,439

Australia

  8  2,354

Continental Europe

    

Austria

  7  1,686

Belgium

  5  878

Czech Republic

  5  937

Denmark

  1  395

France

  10  2,557

Georgia

  2  245

Germany

  36  8,243

Greece

  1  314

Hungary

  2  470

Italy

  8  1,713

Kazakhstan

  2  322

Netherlands

  3  921

Poland

  2  744

Portugal

  3  933

Romania

  1  402

Russia

  8  2,101

Spain

  9  2,359

Switzerland

  3  620
      

Total Europe

  108  25,840

United Kingdom and Ireland

    

Ireland

  7  1,111

United Kingdom (England, Scotland, and Wales)

  57  11,123
      

Total United Kingdom and Ireland

  64  12,234
      

Total-All Countries and Territories

  2,999  535,093
      

(1)

Includes Timeshare products that are in active sales as well as those that are sold out. Products in active sales may not be ready for occupancy.

Descriptions of our Brands

North American Full-Service Segment, North American Limited-Service Segment,

and International Segment Lodging Products

Marriott Hotels & Resortsis our global flagship brand, primarily serving business and leisure upper-upscale travelers and meeting groups. Marriott properties are located in downtown, urban, and suburban areas, near airports, and at resort locations. Marriott inspires your best performance during travel, engineering an experience with the services and human touches that help you achieve and revive.

Typically, properties contain from 300 to 700 well-appointed rooms, the Revive® bedding package, in-room high-speed Internet access, swimming pools, convention and banquet facilities, destination-driven restaurants and lounges, room service, concierge lounges, wireless Internet access in public places, and parking facilities. Sixteen properties have over 1,000 rooms. Many resort properties have additional recreational and entertainment facilities, such as tennis courts, golf courses, additional restaurants and lounges, and spa facilities. New and renovated properties typically reflect the new Marriott guest room which features contemporary residential design, warm colors, rich woods and architectural detail, flat-screen high-definition televisions, “plug and play” technology, and bathrooms reflecting spa-like luxury. At year-end 2007, there were 469 Marriott Hotels & Resorts properties (168,536 rooms), not including JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts or Marriott Conference Centers.

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts is the Marriott brand’s collection of luxurious properties and resorts that cater to accomplished, discerning travelers seeking an elegant environment and personal service. At year-end 2007 there were 38 properties (16,532 rooms) primarily located in gateway cities and upscale locations throughout the world. JW Marriott Resorts offer attentive service and exceptional amenities, many with world-class golf and spa facilities. In addition to the features found in a typical Marriott full-service property, the facilities and amenities at JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts properties normally include larger guest rooms, higher end décor and furnishings, upgraded in-room amenities, upgraded business centers and fitness centers, and 24-hour room service.

At year-end 2007, there were 13Marriott Conference Centers (3,476 rooms) throughout the United States. Some of the centers are used exclusively by employees of sponsoring organizations, while others are marketed to outside meeting groups and individuals. In addition to the features found in a typical Marriott full-service property, the centers typically include expanded meeting room space, banquet and dining facilities, and recreational facilities.

Marriott Hotels & Resorts, JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, and Marriott

Conference Centers

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007

Properties

United States (42 states and the District of Columbia)

342(136,348 rooms)

Non-U.S. (49 countries and territories)

Americas

39

Continental Europe

37

United Kingdom and Ireland

50

Asia

29

Middle East and Africa

18

Australia

5

Total Non-U.S.

178(52,196 rooms)

Renaissance Hotels & Resortsis a distinctive and global quality-tier full-service brand that targets individual business and leisure travelers and group meetings seeking to discover stylish and personalized environments. Renaissance helps keep life on the road interesting with “Savvy Services,” and touches like destination restaurants and stylish designs that help guests enjoy access to new, ever-changing experiences on and off property.

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts properties are generally located at downtown locations in major cities, in suburban office parks, near major gateway airports, and in destination resorts. Most properties contain from 300 to 500 rooms. Renaissance properties and services typically feature distinctive décor, in-room high-speed Internet access, restaurants and lounges, room service, swimming pools, gift shops, concierge lounges, and meeting and banquet facilities. New and renovated properties typically reflect the new Renaissance guest room that blends fashion and provocative design with local touches. Rooms also feature sophisticated lighting, architectural detail, flat-screen high-definition televisions, and “plug and play” technology. Resort properties typically have additional recreational and entertainment facilities and services, including golf courses, tennis courts, water sports, additional restaurants, and spa facilities. At year-end 2007, there were 141 Renaissance Hotels & Resorts properties (48,934 rooms), including one Renaissance ClubSport property (175 rooms).

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007

Properties

United States (26 states and the District of Columbia)

71(26,117 rooms)

Non-U.S. (30 countries and territories)

Americas

8

Continental Europe

30

United Kingdom

5

Asia

22

Middle East and Africa

5

Total Non-U.S.

70(22,817 rooms)

Courtyard is our upper-moderate price select-service hotel product aimed primarily at transient business travel. Courtyard hotels maintain a residential atmosphere and typically contain 90 to 150 rooms in suburban locales and 140 to 340 rooms in downtown domestic and international locales. Well-landscaped grounds typically include a courtyard with a pool and social areas. Hotels feature functionally designed quality guest rooms and meeting rooms, free in-room and lobby high-speed Internet access (in North America), limited restaurant facilities, a swimming pool, an exercise room, andThe Market (a self-serve food store open 24 hours a day). The operating systems developed for these hotels allow Courtyard to be price-competitive while providing better value through superior facilities and guest service. At year-end 2007, there were 767 Courtyards (110,780 rooms) operating in 29 countries and territories.

Courtyard

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007

Properties

United States (47 states and the District of Columbia)

693(96,759 rooms)

Non-U.S. (28 countries and territories)

Americas

30

Continental Europe

31

Asia

7

Middle East and Africa

3

Australia

3

Total Non-U.S.

74(14,021 rooms)

Fairfield Inn is our hotel brand that competes in the lower-moderate price tier and is primarily aimed at value-conscious individual business travelers. Fairfield Inn (which includes Fairfield Inn & Suites) offers free in-room and lobby high-speed Internet access, a swimming pool, complimentary “Early EatsTM” continental breakfast and free local phone calls. A typical Fairfield Inn or Fairfield Inn & Suites property has 60 to 140 rooms in suburban locations and up to 200 rooms in urban destinations. At year-end 2007, there were 334 Fairfield Inn properties and 203 Fairfield Inn & Suites properties (537 hotels total), operating in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Fairfield Inn and Fairfield Inn & Suites

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007

Properties

United States (47 states)

529(46,930 rooms)

Non-U.S. Americas (Canada and Mexico)

8(947 rooms)

SpringHill Suites is our all-suite brand in the upper-moderate-price tier primarily targeting business travelers. SpringHill Suites properties typically have 90 to 165 studio suites that are more spacious than a typical hotel guest room. The brand offers a broad range of amenities, including free in-room and lobby high-speed Internet access,The Market (a self-serve food store open 24 hours a day), complimentary “Suite Seasons®” hot breakfast buffet, exercise facilities, and a swimming pool. There were 177 properties (20,569 rooms) located in the United States and Canada at year-end 2007.

Residence Inn is North America’s leading extended-stay brand. For today’s marathon business traveler, Residence Inn allows guests on long-term trips to experience all the comforts of home while traveling so that they can ‘Thrive on Long Stays’ in a particular location. Residence Inn provides connectivity to home and office, exercise options and comfortable places to work or relax. Residence Inn also provides upscale design and style, spacious suites with full kitchens, separate sleeping areas and “real” food at social events or in suite. At year-end 2007, there were 546 Residence Inn properties (65,416 rooms) located in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Residence Inn

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007

Properties

United States (47 states and the District of Columbia)

528(62,805 rooms)

Non-U.S. Americas (Canada and Mexico)

18(2,611 rooms)

TownePlace Suitesis a moderately priced extended-stay hotel product that is designed to appeal to business and leisure travelers who stay for five nights or more. Designed for the self-sufficient, value-conscious traveler, each suite generally provides functional spaces for living and working, including a full kitchen and a home office. TownePlace Suites associates are trained to provide insightful local knowledge, and each hotel specializes in delivering service that helps guests settle in to the local area. Additional amenities include housekeeping services, on-site exercise facilities, an outdoor pool, 24-hour staffing, free in-room high-speed Internet access, and laundry facilities. At year-end 2007, 141 TownePlace Suites properties (14,122 rooms) were located in 37 states.

Marriott ExecuStayprovides furnished corporate apartments primarily for long-term stays nationwide. ExecuStay owns no residential real estate and provides units primarily through short-term lease agreements with apartment owners and managers and franchise agreements. At year-end 2007, Marriott leased approximately 2,100 apartments and our 11 franchisees leased over 2,300 apartments. Apartments are located in 44 different markets in the United States, of which 34 are franchised.

Marriott Executive Apartments.We provide temporary housing (“Serviced Apartments”) for business executives and others who need quality accommodations outside their home country, usually for 30 or more days. Some Serviced Apartments operate under theMarriott Executive Apartmentsbrand, which is designed specifically for the long-term international traveler. At year-end 2007, 15 Marriott Executive Apartments and three other Serviced Apartments properties (2,905 rooms total) were located in 12 countries and territories. All Marriott Executive Apartments are located outside the United States.

Luxury Segment Lodging Products

The Ritz-Carlton is a leading global luxury lifestyle brand of hotels and resorts renowned for their distinctive architecture and for the high quality level of their facilities, dining options, and exceptional personalized guest service. Most of The Ritz-Carlton hotels have 250 to 400 guest rooms and typically include meeting and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, a club level, gift shops, high-speed Internet access, flat-screen high-definition televisions, swimming pools, and parking facilities. Guests at most of The Ritz-Carlton resorts have access to additional recreational amenities, such as tennis courts, golf courses, and health spas.

The Ritz-Carlton

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007(1)

Properties

United States (16 states and the District of Columbia)

52(13,241 rooms)

Non-U.S. (22 countries and territories)

Americas

7

Continental Europe

8

Asia

14

Middle East and Africa

6

Total Non-U.S.

35(10,071 rooms)

(1)

Includes 17 home and condominium projects (1,707 units) for which we manage the related owners’ associations.

Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.Through a joint venture with jeweler and luxury goods designer Bulgari SpA we operate distinctive luxury hotel properties in prime locations under the name Bulgari Hotels & Resorts. The first property (58 rooms), the Bulgari Hotel Milano, opened in Milan, Italy, in 2004. The second property, the Bulgari Resort Bali, opened in late 2006 and includes 59 private villas, two restaurants, and comprehensive spa facilities. In November 2007, we opened two new restaurants in Tokyo, Japan, which we operate in connection with two new Bulgari retail stores. Other projects are currently in various stages of development in Europe, Asia, and North America.

Timeshare Segment Lodging Products

TheMarriott Vacation Club International(“MVCI”MVC”) brand offers full-service villas featuring living and dining areas, one-, two-, and three-bedroom options, a full kitchen, and washer/dryer.dryer units. Customers may purchase a one-week interval or more at each resort. In 4346 locations worldwide, this brand draws United States and international customers who vacation regularly with a focus on family, relaxation, and recreational activities. In the United States, MVCIin addition to other areas, MVC is located in Las Vegas, Nevada, in beach andand/or golf communities in

Arizona, California, the Carolinas,South Carolina, Florida, and Hawaii and in ski resorts in California, Colorado, and Utah. Internationally, MVCIMVC has resorts in Aruba, France, Spain, St. Thomas (U.S. Virgin Islands), the West Indies, and Thailand.

The Ritz-Carlton Club brand is a luxury-tier real estate fractional ownership and personal residence brand that combines the benefits of second homesecond-home ownership with personalized services and amenities. This brand is designed as a private club whose members have access to all Ritz-Carlton Clubs. This brandClubs, and is offered in ski, golf, and beach destinations in the Bahamas, California, Colorado, St. Thomas U.S.V.I.(U.S. Virgin Islands), Florida, and Florida.Hawaii. Customers typically purchase three-to-five-week intervals, but may also purchase a residence outright.

Marriott Grand Residence ClubResidences by Marriott is an upper-quality-tier fractional ownership and personal residence brand for corporate and leisure customers. This brand is currently offering ownership in projects located in Lake Tahoe, California, Panama City, Florida, and London, England. Customers typically purchase three-to-13-week intervals.

Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club Internationalis Marriott Vacation Club’s moderately priced timeshare brand whose product offerings and customer base are currently focused on facilitatingoffering family vacations in entertainment communities. Horizons resorts are located in Orlando, Florida and Branson, Missouri. Customers may purchase a one-week interval or more at each resort.

We expect that our futurelong-term timeshare growth will increasingly reflect opportunities presented by partnerships, joint ventures,various third-party business structures, as well as a continued focus on our core and other business structures. In 2004, we initiated sales at our Las Vegas joint venture, and we expect to open the Las Vegas resort in the third quarter of 2005.predominantly wholly owned Marriott Vacation Club International openedbrand. We also anticipate that residential and fractional products, especially of the following three resorts in 2004 underluxury The Ritz-Carlton Club brand, will offer the MVCI brand: Aruba Surf Club in Aruba, Canyon Villas in Phoenix, Arizona, and Ocean Watch in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Our project in Hilton Head, South Carolina, opened for sales in 2004, and we expect thatfastest growth opportunity over the resort will open inshort-term within the second quarter of 2005.Timeshare segment.

Marriott Vacation Club International’sThe Timeshare segment’s owner base continues to expand, with approximately 281,500371,000 owners at year-end 2004,2007, compared to approximately 256,000343,000 at year-end 2003.2006.

 

Timeshare (all brands)

Geographic Distribution at Year-end 2007

  Resorts  Units

Continental United States

  43  8,572

Hawaii

  5  1,544

Caribbean

  7  993

Europe

  5  932

Asia

  1  144
      

Total

  61  12,185
      

Timeshare (all brands)New Lodging Products

Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott. In May 2007, we announced our new brand of family-friendly resorts and spas, “Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott.” These upscale, self-contained resorts are expected to feature Nickelodeon signature activities, state-of-the-art pools, water parks, entertainment starring Nickelodeon’s characters such as Dora the Explorer and SpongeBob SquarePants, and spas for adults and kids. Projects are in various stages of development in the United States, and we expect to open the first property in San Diego in 2010. Other potential resort locations being considered for development include major family-oriented destinations in the United States, Caribbean and Mexican resort areas, the United Kingdom and Europe, Asia, Australia, and the Middle East.

Geographic Distribution at December 31, 2004


  Resorts

  Units

Continental United States

  38  7,001

Hawaii

  4  1,060

Caribbean

  3  694

Europe

  5  812

Asia

  1  102
   
  

Total

  51  9,669
   
  

Edition. In June 2007, we announced that we had joined forces with hotel innovator Ian Schrager to create next-generation lifestyle boutique hotels. Edition combines a personal, intimate, individualized, and unique lodging experience on a global scale. These new lifestyle boutique hotels attempt to push the boundaries, break new ground, and take the hotel industry to a new level. Plans include building and operating up to 100 distinct hotels around the world.

Other Activities

Marriott Golf manages 3144 golf course facilities as part of our management of hotels and for other golf course owners.

We operate 1814 systemwide hotel reservation centers, 10eight in the United States and Canada and eightsix in other countries and territories, thatwhich handle reservation requests for Marriottour lodging brands worldwide, including franchised properties. We own one of the U.S. facilities and lease the others.

Additionally, we focus on increasing value for the consumer and “selling the way the customer wants to buy.” Our Look No Further® Best Rate Guarantee, which givesassures customers access to the samethat they won’t find cheaper rates whether they bookthan those available through our telephone reservation system, our webWeb site or any other Marriott reservation channel;channel, our

strong Marriott Rewards loyalty program;program, and our information-rich and easy to use Marriott.com webeasy-to-usewww.Marriott.com Web site all encourage customers to make reservations using the Marriott webWeb site. We have complete control over ourOur reservation system manages and controls inventory availability and pricing set by our hotels, and allows us to utilize online and offline agents on an as-needed basis. The shift of hotel bookings to our web site from other online channels results in higher revenue, margins and profitability.where cost effective. With over 2,600almost 3,000 hotels economies of scale enable us to reduceminimize costs per occupied room, drive profits for our owners, and increasemaximize our fee revenue.

Our Architecture and Construction (“A&C”) division provides design, development, construction, refurbishment, and procurement services to owners and franchisees of lodging properties on a voluntary basis outside the scope of and separate from theirour management or franchise contracts. Consistent withSimilar to third-party contractors, A&C provides these services for owners and franchisees of Marriott-branded properties on a fee basis.

Competition

We encounter strong competition both as a lodging operator and as a franchisor. We believe that by operating a number of hotels among our brands, we stay in direct touch with customers and react to changes in the marketplace more quickly than chains that rely exclusively on franchising. There are approximately 675770 lodging management companies in the United States, including several that operate more than 100 properties. These operators are primarily private management firms, but also include several large national chains that own and operate their own hotels and also franchise their brands. ManagementOur management contracts are typically long-term in nature, but most allow the hotel owner to replace the management firm if certain financial or performance criteria are not met.

Affiliation with a national or regional brand is prevalent in the U.S. lodging industry. In 2004,2007, approximately two-thirds of U.S. hotel rooms were brand-affiliated. Most of the branded properties are franchises, under which the operator pays the franchisor a fee for use of its hotel name and reservation system. The franchising business is fairly concentrated, with the threesix largest franchisors operating multiple brands accounting for a significant proportion of all U.S. rooms.

Outside the United States, branding is much less prevalent and most markets are served primarily by independent operators, although branding is more common for new hotel development. We believe that chain affiliation will increase in overseas markets as local economies grow, trade barriers are reduced, international travel accelerates and hotel owners seek the economies of centralized reservation systems and marketing programs.

Based on lodging industry data, we have less than an 8.4a 9 percent share of the U.S. hotel market (based on number of rooms), and we estimate less than a 1 percent share of the lodging market outside the United States. We believe that our hotel

brands are attractive to hotel owners seeking a management company or franchise affiliation because our hotels typically generate higher occupancies and Revenue per Available Room (REVPAR)(“RevPAR”) than direct competitors in most market areas. We attribute this performance premium to our success in achieving and maintaining strong customer preference. Approximately 34 percent of our timeshare ownership resort sales come from additional purchases by or referrals from existing owners. We believe that the location and quality of our lodging facilities, our marketing programs, our reservation systems and our emphasis on guest service and satisfaction are contributing factors across all of our brands.

Properties that we operate or franchise are regularly upgraded to maintain their competitiveness. OurMost of our management lease and franchise agreements provide for the allocation of funds, generally a fixed percentage of revenue, for periodic renovation of buildings and replacement of furnishings. We believe that theseThese ongoing refurbishment programs, along with periodic brand initiatives, are generally adequate to preserve or enhance the competitive position and earning power of the hotels and timeshare properties.

While service excellence is Marriott’s hallmark, we continually look for new ways to delight our guests. Currently, we are focused on elevating the Marriott experience beyond that of a traditional hotel stay to a total guest experience that encompasses exceptional style, personal luxury, and superior service. This approach to hospitality, “The New Look and Feel of Marriott Now,” is influenced by the world’s foremost innovations in design, technology, culinary expertise, service, and comfort.

This evolution can begin to be seen across all of our brands, in new and stylish hotel designs, luxurious bedding, exotic destinations, enhancedworld-class spas and fitness centers, sumptuous spas and expanded culinary offerings.inspired cuisine. Each brand, whetherfrom luxury orto moderately priced, will be more upscale and attuned to customer needs than ever before. We believe

Our At Your Service®program focuses on the total guest experience from point of reservation to checkout. As part of the pre-arrival planning service, guests receive a personalized email prior to check-in that by operatingincludes local transportation, weather, and restaurant information, as well as directions and maps. At a growing number of hotels amongand resorts, service has been expanded to include a “virtual concierge.” Guests are able to reserve spa treatments, room service for delivery upon arrival, and other amenities specific to each property. Guests may also request complimentary amenities such as extra pillows, miniature refrigerators, and early check-in or late checkout. We have also streamlined the travel planning and booking process with the addition of Marriott Flexrez to At Your Service. In addition to booking hotel rooms onwww.Marriott.com, our brands, we stay in direct touch withonline customers can now find competitive airfare and react to changes in the marketplace more quickly than chains that rely exclusively on franchising.car rental rates there as well.

The vacation ownership industry is one of the fastest growing segments in hospitality and is comprised of a number of highly competitive companies including several branded hotel companies. Since entering the timeshare industry in 1984,over 20 years ago, we have become a recognized leader in vacation ownership worldwide. Competition in the timeshare interval, fractional, and residential business is based primarily on the quality and location of timeshare resorts, trust in the brand, the pricing of timeshare intervalsproduct offerings, and the availability of program benefits, such as exchange programs. We believe that our focus on offering distinct vacation experiences, combined with our financial strength, diverse market presence, strong brands, and well-maintained properties, will enable us to remain competitive.

Approximately 40 percent of our timeshare ownership resort sales come from additional purchases by or referrals from existing owners.

Marriott Rewards is a frequent guest program with over 2128 million members and nine participating Marriott brands. The Marriott Rewards program yields repeat guest business by rewarding frequent stays with points toward free hotel stays and other rewards, or airline miles with any of 2629 participating airline programs. We believe that Marriott Rewards generates substantial repeat business that might otherwise go to competing hotels. In 2004, approximately 402007, over 50 percent of our room nights were purchased by Marriott Rewards members. In addition, the ability of Marriott Vacation Club International timeshare owners to convert unused intervals into Marriott Rewards points enhances the competitive position of our timeshare brand.

Synthetic FuelDiscontinued Operations

OperationsSynthetic Fuel

Our synthetic fuel operation currently consistsconsisted of our interest in four coal-based synthetic fuel production facilities (the “Facilities”), two of which are located at a coal mine in Saline County, Illinois, with the remaining two located at a coal mine in Jefferson County, Alabama. Three. Because tax credits under Section 45K of the four plants are held in one entity, and one of the plants is held in a separate entity. The synthetic fuel produced at the Facilities through 2007 qualifies for tax credits based on Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code (creditsIRC are not available for fuel produced after 2007). Although the Facilities incur significant losses, these losses are more than offset by the tax credits generated under Section 29, which reduce our income tax expense.

At bothproduction and sale of the locations, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into long-term site leases at sites that are adjacent to large underground mines as well as barge load-out facilities on navigable rivers. In addition, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into long-term coal purchase agreements with the owners of the adjacent coal mines and long-term synthetic fuel sales contracts with the Tennessee Valley Authority and with Alabama Power Company, two major utilities. These contracts ensure that the operation has long-term agreements to purchase coal and sell synthetic fuel, covering approximately 80 percent of the productive capacity of the Facilities. From time to time, the synthetic fuel operation supplements these base contracts, as opportunities arise, by entering into spot contracts to buy coal from these or other coal mines and sell synthetic fuel to different end users. The operation is slightly seasonal as the synthetic fuel is mainly burned to produce electricity, and electricity use peaks in the summer in the markets served by the synthetic fuel operation. The long-term contracts can generally be cancelled by us in the event that we choose not to operate the Facilities or that the synthetic fuel produced at the Facilities does not qualify for tax credit under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code.

In addition, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into a long-term operationsfrom coal after calendar year-end 2007, and maintenance agreement with an experienced manager of synthetic fuel facilities. This manager is responsible for staffing the Facilities, operating and maintaining the machinery and conducting routine maintenance on behalf of the synthetic fuel operation.

Finally, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into a long-term license and binder purchase agreement with Headwaters Incorporated, which permits the operation to utilize a carboxylated polystyrene copolymer emulsion patented by Headwaters and manufactured by Dow Chemical that is mixed with coal to produce a qualified synthetic fuel.

Our Investment

We acquired the Facilities from PacifiCorp Financial Services (“PacifiCorp”) in October 2001 for $46 million in cash. We began operating these Facilitiesbecause high oil prices during 2007 will result in the first quarter of 2002.

On June 21, 2003, we sold an approximately 50 percent ownership interest in the synthetic fuel entities. We received cash and promissory notes totaling $25 million at closing, and we are receiving additional profits that we expect will continue over the life of the ventures based on the actual amount of tax credits allocated to the purchaser.

On November 7, 2003, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued private letter rulings to the synthetic fuel joint venture confirming that the synthetic fuel produced by the Facilities is a “qualified fuel” under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code and that the resulting tax credit may be allocated among the members of the synthetic fuel joint venture.

As a resultphase-out of a put option associated with the June 21, 2003, sale of a 50 percent ownership interest, we consolidated the two synthetic fuel joint ventures from that date through November 6, 2003. Effective November 7, 2003, because the put option was voided, we began accounting for the synthetic fuel joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. Beginning March 26, 2004, as a result of adopting FIN 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” we have again consolidated the synthetic fuel joint ventures, and we reflect our partner’s share of the operating losses as minority interest.

Internal Revenue Service Placed-in-Service Challenge

In July 2004, IRS field auditors issued a notice of proposed adjustment and later a Summary Report to PacifiCorp that included a challenge to the placed-in-service dates of three of the four synthetic fuel facilities owned by one of our synthetic fuel joint ventures. One of the conditions to qualify for tax credits under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code is that the production facility must have been placed in service before July 1, 1998.

We strongly believe that all the Facilities meet the placed-in-service requirement. Although we are engaged in discussions with the IRS and are confident this issue will be resolved in our favor and not result in a material charge to us, we cannot assure you as to the ultimate outcome of this matter.If ultimately resolved against us, we could be prevented from realizing projected future tax credits and cause us to reverse previously utilized tax credits, requiring payment of substantial additional taxes. Since acquiring the plants, we have recognized approximately $435 million of tax credits from all four plants through December 31, 2004. The tax credits recognized through December 31, 2004, associated with the three facilities in question totaled approximately $330 million.

On October 6, 2004, we entered into amendment agreements with our synthetic fuel partner that result in a shift in the allocation of tax credits between us. On the synthetic fuel facility that is not being reviewed by the IRS, our partner increased its allocation of tax credits from approximately 50 percent to 90 percent through March 31, 2005, and pays a higher price per tax credit to us for that additional share of tax credits. With respect to the three synthetic fuel facilities under IRS review, our partner reduced its allocation of tax credits from approximately 50 percent to an average of roughly 5 percent through March 31, 2005. If the IRS’ placed-in-service challenge regarding the three facilities is not successfully resolved by March 31, 2005, our partner will have the right to return its ownership interest in those three facilities to us at that time. We will have the flexibility to continue to operate at current levels, reduce production and/or sell an interest to another party. If there is a successful resolution by March 31, 2005, our partner’s sharesignificant portion of the tax credits from all four facilities will return to approximately 50 percent. In any event,available for synthetic fuel produced and sold in 2007, on March 31, 2005, our shareNovember 3, 2007, we shut down the Facilities and permanently ceased production of the tax credits from the one facility not under review will return to approximately 50 percent.

Discontinued Operations

Senior Living Services

On December 30, 2002, we entered into definitive agreements to sell our senior living management business to Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”) and to sell nine senior living communities to CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CNL”), and we recorded after-tax charges of $131 million in 2002 associated with our agreement to sell our senior living management business. We completed the sales to Sunrise and CNL, in addition to the related sale of a parcel of land to Sunrise in March 2003, for $266 million. We recorded after-tax gains of $19 million in 2003.

As a result of the above transactions we now report this business in discontinued operations.

Distribution Services

In the third quarter of 2002, we completed a strategic review of our Distribution Services business and decided to exit that business. As of January 3, 2003, through a combination of sale and transfer of nine facilities and the termination of all operations at four facilities, we completed our exit of the Distribution Services business. We recorded after-tax charges of $40 million in 2002 in connection with the decision to exit this business.synthetic fuel. Accordingly, we now report this business segment as a discontinued operation. The book value of the Facilities was zero at year-end 2007, as the Facilities have been transferred to third parties. Under the site leases for the Facilities, we were required to restore the leased premises to substantially the condition the premises were in discontinued operations.when the leases were originally executed. However, we executed agreements with the lessors of the sites pursuant to which we transferred the Facilities to the lessors in exchange for the release of our obligations to restore the leased premises to their original conditions. Costs associated with shutting down the synthetic fuel operation and transferring the Facilities to the site lessors were not material.

Employee Relations

At year-end 2007, we had approximately 151,000 employees, approximately 8,700 of which were represented by labor unions. We believe relations with our employees are positive.

Environmental Compliance

Our compliance with laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and discharge of hazardous materials has not had a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position, and we do not anticipate any material impact from such compliance in the future.

Internet Address and Company SEC Filings

Our Internet address iswww.Marriott.com. On the investor relations portion of our Web site,www.Marriott.com/investor, we provide a link to our electronic SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports. All such filings are available free of charge and are available as soon as reasonably practicable after filing. The information found on our Web site is not part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

Forward-Looking Statements

We make forward-looking statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this report based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management and on information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements include information about our possible or assumed future results of operations in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”which follow under the headings “Business and Overview,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources”Resources,” and other statements throughout this report preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,”“estimates” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involveare subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, including the risks and assumptions, including risksuncertainties described below and other risks thatfactors we describe from time to time in our periodic filings with the SEC, and our actual results may differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements.SEC. We therefore caution you not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statement.statements. The forward-looking statements in this report speak only as of the date of thethis report, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Risks and Uncertainties

We are subject to various risks that could have a negative effect on the Company and its financial condition. You should understand that these risks could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements contained in this report and in other Company communications. Because there is no way to determine in advance whether, or to what extent, any present uncertainty will ultimately impact our business, you should give equal weight to each of the following.following:

Lodging Industry Risks

The lodging industry is highly competitive, which may impact our ability to compete successfully with other hotel and timeshare properties for customers. We generally operate in markets that contain numerous competitors. Each of our hotel and timeshare brands competes with major hotel chains in national and international venues and with independent companies in regional markets. Our ability to remain competitive and to attract and retain business and leisure travelers depends on our success in distinguishing the quality, value, and efficiency of our lodging products and services from those offered by others. If we are unable to compete successfully in these areas, this could limit our operating margins, diminish our market share, and reduce our earnings.

We are subject to the range of operating risks common to the hotel, timeshare, and corporate apartment industries. The profitability of the hotels, vacation timeshare resorts, and corporate apartments that we operate or franchise may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including:

 

 (1)the availability of and demand for hotel rooms, timesharestimeshare interval, fractional ownership and residential products, and apartments;

 

 (2)international, national, and regional economic and geopolitical conditions;

 

 (3)the impact of war, actual or threatened terrorist activity and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to war, terrorist activity or threats;

(4)the desirability of particular locations and changes in travel patterns;

 

 (4)(5)travelers’ fears of exposure to contagious diseases, such as Avian Flu and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”);

(6)the occurrence of natural disasters, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, and hurricanes;

(7)taxes and government regulations that influence or determine wages, prices, interest rates, construction procedures, and costs;

 

 (5)(8)the availability and cost of capital to allow us and potential hotel owners and joint venture partners to fund investments;

 

 (6)(9)regional and national development of competing properties; and

 

 (7)(10)increases in wages and other labor costs, energy, healthcare, insurance, transportation and fuel, and other expenses central to the conduct of our business.business, including recent increases in energy costs; and

 

(11)organized labor activities, which could cause the diversion of business from hotels involved in labor negotiations, loss of group business, and/or increased labor costs.

Any one or more of these factors could limit or reduce the demand and thereforeor the prices we are able to obtain for hotel rooms, timeshare units, residential units, and corporate apartments. In addition, reducedapartments or could increase our costs and therefore reduce the profit of our lodging businesses. Reduced demand for hotels could also give rise to losses under loans, guarantees, and minority equity investments that we have made in connection with hotels that we manage.

Even where such factors do not reduce demand, our profit margins may suffer if we are unable to fully recover increased operating costs from our customers.

The uncertain pace ofenvironment in the lodging industry’s recoveryindustry will continue to impact our financial results and growth.Both the Company and the lodging industry were hurt by several events occurring over the last fewseveral years, including the global economic downturn, the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)in September 2001, the global outbreak of SARS in 2003, and military action in Iraq. Business and leisure travel decreased and remained depressed as some potential travelers reduced or avoided discretionary travel in light of increased delays and safety concerns and economic declines stemming from an erosion in consumer confidence. Weaker hotel performance reduced management and franchise fees and gave rise to fundings or losses under loans, guarantees and minority investments that we have made in connection with some hotels that we manage, which, in turn, has had a material adverse impact on our financial performance. Although by 2007 both the lodging and travel industries are recovering,had recovered from the pace, duration and full extentdepressed levels during those years, recent concerns over the possibility of that recovery remain unclear.an economic slowdown have left it unclear whether the recent growth environment will continue. Accordingly, our financial results and growth could be harmed if thatthe industry recovery stalls or is reversed.

Operational Risks

Our new branded hotel products may not be successful.We recently announced two new branded hotel products, Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott® and Edition, and may launch additional branded hotel products in the future. We cannot assure that these brands will be accepted by hotel owners, potential franchisees, or the traveling public, that we will recover the costs we incurred in developing the brands, or that the brands will be successful. In addition, each of these new brands involves cooperation and/or consultation with a third party, including some shared control over product design and development, sales and marketing and brand standards. Disagreements between us and these third parties regarding areas of consultation or shared control could slow the development of these new brands and/or impair Marriott’s ability to take actions it believes to be advisable for the success and profitability of such brands.

Our lodging operations are subject to international, national, and regional conditions. Because we conduct our business on a national and international platform, our activities are susceptible to changes in the performance of regional and global economies. In recent years, our business has beenwas hurt by decreases in travel resulting from recent economic conditions, the military action in Iraq, and the heightened travel security measures that have resulted from the threat of further terrorism. Our future economic performance is similarly subject to the uncertain magnitude and duration of the economic recoveryenvironment in the United States the prospects of improving economic performance inand other regions, the resulting unknown pace of any business travel, recovery that results, and the occurrence of any future incidents in the countries in whichwhere we operate.

Our growth strategy depends upon third-party owners/operators,Risks relating to natural disasters, contagious disease, terrorist activity, and future arrangements withwar could reduce the demand for lodging, which may adversely affect our revenues. So called “Acts of God,” such as hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters, and the spread of contagious diseases, such as Avian Flu and SARS, in locations where we own, manage or franchise significant properties, and areas of the world from which we draw a large number of customers can cause a decline in the level of business and leisure travel and reduce the demand for lodging. Actual or threatened war, terrorist activity, political unrest, civil strife, and other geopolitical uncertainty can have a similar effect. Any one or more of these third partiesevents may be less favorable. Our present growth strategyreduce the overall demand for development of additional lodging facilities entails entering intohotel rooms, timeshare units, and maintaining various arrangements with property owners. The terms of our management agreements, franchise agreements and leases for each of our lodging facilitiescorporate apartments or limit the prices that we are influenced by contract terms offered by our competitors, among other things. We cannot assure you that any of our current arrangements will continue. Moreover, we may not be able to enter into future collaborations, or to renew or enter into agreements in the future, on terms that are as favorable to us as those under existing collaborations and agreements.obtain for them, both of which could adversely affect our profits.

We may have disputes with the owners of the hotels that we manage or franchise. Consistent with our focus on management and franchising, we own very few of our lodging properties. The nature of our responsibilities under our management agreements to manage each hotel and enforce the standards required for our brands under both management and franchise agreements may in some instances, be subject to interpretation and may give rise to disagreements.disagreements in some instances. We seek to resolve any disagreements in order to develop and maintain positive relations with current and potential hotel owners and joint venture partners but have not always been able to do so. Failure to resolve such disagreements has in the past resulted in litigation, and could do so in the future.

Damage to or other potential losses involving properties that we own, manage or franchise may not be covered by insurance. We have comprehensive property and liability insurance policies with coverage features and insured limits that we believe are customary. Market forces beyond our control may nonetheless limit the scope of insurance coverage that we can obtain and our ability to obtain coverage at reasonable rates. Certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and floods, or terrorist acts, may be uninsurable or too expensive to justify obtaining insurance. As a result, we may not be successful in obtaining insurance without increases in cost or decreases in coverage levels. In addition, in the event of a substantial loss, the insurance coverage we carry may not be sufficient to pay the full market value or replacement cost of our lost investment or that of hotel owners or in some cases could result in certain losses being totally uninsured. As a result, we could lose some or all of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property, and we could remain obligated for guarantees, debt, or other financial obligations related to the property.

Development and Financing Risks

Our growth strategy depends upon third-party owners/operators, and future arrangements with these third parties may be less favorable. Our present growth strategy for development of additional lodging facilities entails entering into and maintaining various arrangements with property owners. The terms of our management agreements, franchise agreements, and leases for each of our lodging facilities are influenced by contract terms offered by our competitors, among other things. We cannot assure you that any of our current arrangements will continue or that we will be able to enter into future collaborations, renew agreements, or enter into new agreements in the future on terms that are as favorable to us as those that exist today.

Our ability to grow our management and franchise systems is subject to the range of risks associated with real estate investmentsinvestments.. Our ability to sustain continued growth through management or franchise agreements for new hotels and the conversion of existing facilities to managed or franchised Marriott brands is affected, and may potentially be limited, by a variety of factors influencing real estate development generally. These include site availability, financing, planning, zoning and other local approvals, and other limitations that may be imposed by market and submarket factors, such as projected room occupancy, changes in growth in demand oppositecompared to projected supply, territorial restrictions in our management and franchise agreements, costs of construction, and anticipated room rate structure.

We depend on capital to buy and maintain hotels, and hotel owners or we may be unable to access capital when necessary. In order to fund new hotel investments, as well as refurbish and improve existing hotels, both the Company and current and potential hotel owners must periodically spend money. The availability of funds for new investments and maintenance of existing hotels depends in large measure on capital markets and liquidity factors over which we can exert little control. Our ability to recover loan and guarantee advances from hotel operations or from owners through the proceeds of hotel sales, refinancing of debt or otherwise may also affect our ability to recycle and raise new capital. In addition, downgrades of our public debt ratings by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service or similar companies could increase our cost of capital.

InFurther volatility in the eventcredit markets could adversely impact our ability to sell the loans that our Timeshare business generates. Our Timeshare business provides financing to purchasers of damageour timeshare and fractional properties, and we periodically sell interests in those loans in the securities markets. While we do not believe that recent volatility in the credit markets will prevent us from continuing to sell those notes on attractive terms,further volatility could cause future sale terms to be materially less favorable to us or prevent us from selling our timeshare notes entirely, which in turn would reduce future gains and could result in increased borrowings to provide capital to replace anticipated proceeds from such sales.

Our development activities expose us to project cost, completion, and resale risks. We develop new hotel, timeshare interval, fractional ownership, and residential properties, both directly and through partnerships, joint ventures, and other potential losses involvingbusiness structures with third parties. Our involvement in the development of properties presents a number of risks, including that: (1) construction delays, cost overruns, or so called “Acts of God” such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods or fires may increase overall project costs or result in project cancellations; (2) we may be unable to recover development costs we incur for projects that are not pursued to completion; (3) conditions within capital markets may limit our ability, or that of third parties with whom we do business, to raise capital for completion of projects that have commenced or development of future properties; and (4) properties that we own, managedevelop could become less attractive due to changes in mortgage rates, market absorption or franchise, potential losses may not be covered by insurance. We have comprehensive property and liability insurance policiesoversupply, with coverage features and insured limitsthe result that we believe are customary. Market forces beyond our control may nonetheless limit both the scope of property and liability insurance coverage that we can obtain and our ability to obtain coverage at reasonable rates. There are certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes and floods or terrorist acts, that may be uninsurable or may be too expensive to justify insuring against. As a result, we may not be successful in obtaining insurance without increases in costable to sell such properties for a profit or decreases in coverage levels. In addition,at the prices or selling pace we may carry insurance coverageanticipate.

Development activities that in the event of a substantial loss, would not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost ofinvolve our lost investment or that of hotel owners, or in some cases could alsoco-investment with third parties may result in certain losses being totally uninsured. As a result, wedisputes that could lose all,increase project costs, impair project operations, or a portionincrease project completion risks. Partnerships, joint ventures, and other business structures involving our co-investment with third parties generally include some form of shared control over the operations of the capitalbusiness and create additional risks, including the possibility that other investors in such ventures could become bankrupt or otherwise lack the financial resources to meet their obligations, or could have or develop business interests, policies or objectives that are inconsistent with ours. Although we have investedactively seek to minimize such risks before investing in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property, and we could remain obligated for guarantees, debtpartnerships, joint ventures or other financial obligations related to the property.similar structures, actions by another investor may present additional risks of project delay, increased project costs, or operational difficulties following project completion.

Risks relating to actsassociated with development and sale of God, terrorist activityresidential properties that are associated with our lodging and wartimeshare properties or brands may reduce our profits. In certain hotel and timeshare projects we participate, through minority interests and/or licensing fees, in the development and sale of residential properties associated with

our brands, including luxury residences, and condominiums under our Ritz-Carlton and Marriott brands. Such projects pose additional risks beyond those generally associated with our lodging and timeshare businesses, which may reduce our profits or compromise our brand equity, including the following:

Decreases in residential real estate and vacation home prices or demand generally, which have historically been cyclical, could reduce our profits or even result in losses on residential sales, result in significant carrying costs if the demand for lodging, whichpace of sales is slower than we anticipate, or make it more difficult to convince future hotel development partners of the value added by our brands;

Increases in interest rates, reductions in mortgage availability, or increases in the costs of residential ownership could prevent potential customers from buying residential products or reduce the prices they are willing to pay; and

Residential construction may adversely affect our revenues. Acts of God, such as natural disastersbe subject to warranty and liability claims, and the spreadcosts of contagious diseases,resolving such claims may be significant.

Technology, Information Protection, and Privacy Risks

A failure to keep pace with developments in locations wheretechnology could impair our operations or competitive position. The lodging and timeshare industries continue to demand the use of sophisticated technology and systems, including those used for our reservation, revenue management and property management systems, our Marriott Rewards program, and technologies we own, manage make available to our guests. These technologies and systems must be refined, updated, and/or franchise significant propertiesreplaced with more advanced systems on a regular basis. If we are unable to do so as quickly as our competitors or within budgeted costs and areas oftime frames, our business could suffer. We also may not achieve the worldbenefits that we anticipate from which we drawany new technology or system, and a large number of customers can cause a declinefailure to do so could result in higher than anticipated costs or could impair our operating results.

An increase in the level of business and leisure travel and reduce the demand for lodging. Wars (including the potential for war), terrorist activity (including threats of terrorist activity), political unrest and other forms of civil strife and geopolitical uncertainty can have a similar effect. Any one or more of these events may reduce the overall demand for hotel rooms, timeshare units and corporate apartments, or limit the prices that we are able to obtain for them, both of which could adversely affect our revenues.

Increasing use of internetthird-party Internet reservation services maycould adversely impact our revenues. Some of our hotel rooms are booked through internetInternet travel intermediaries, such as Expedia.com®, Travelocity.com®, and Priceline.com®, serving both the leisure and, increasingly, the corporate travel and group meeting sectors. While Marriott’s Look No Further® Best Rate Guarantee has greatly reduced the ability of these internetInternet travel intermediaries to undercut the published rates of Marriottat our hotels, these internet travel intermediaries continue their attempts to commoditize hotel rooms by aggressively marketing to price-sensitive travelers and corporate accounts and increasing the importance of general indicators of quality (such as “three-star downtown hotel”) at the expense of brand identification. These agencies hope that consumers will eventually develop brand loyalties to their travel services rather than to our lodging brands. Although we expect to continue to maintain and even increase the strength of our brands in the online marketplace, if the amount of sales made through internetInternet intermediaries increases significantly, our business and profitability may be harmed.

Failure to maintain the integrity of internal or customer data could result in faulty business decisions, damage of reputation and/or subject us to costs, fines or lawsuits. Our businesses require collection and retention of large volumes of internal and customer data, including credit card numbers and other personally identifiable information of our customers as they are entered into, processed by, summarized by, and reported by our various information systems. We also maintain personally identifiable information about our employees. The integrity and protection of that customer, employee, and company data is critical to us. If that data is not accurate or complete we could make faulty decisions. Our customers also have a high expectation that we will adequately protect their personal information, and the regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, both in the U.S. and other international jurisdictions in which we operate. A significant theft, loss or fraudulent use of customer, employee or company data could adversely impact our reputation and could result in remedial and other expenses, fines and litigation.

Changes in privacy law could adversely affect our ability to market our products effectively. Our timeshare business,Timeshare segment, and to a lesser extent our other lodging segments, rely on a variety of direct marketing techniques, including telemarketing, email marketing, and masspostal mailings. Recent initiatives,Any further restrictions in laws such as the National Do Not Call RegistryTelemarketing Sales Rule, CANSPAM Act, and various U.S. state laws, or new federal laws, regarding marketing and solicitation including anti-spam legislation, have created some concern aboutor international data protection laws that govern these activities could adversely affect the continuing effectiveness of telemarketing, email, and masspostal mailing techniques and could force further changes in our marketing strategy. If this occurs, we may not be able to develop adequate alternative marketing strategies, which could impact the amount and timing of our sales of timeshare units and other products. We also obtain lists ofaccess to potential customers from travel service providers or other companies with whom we have substantial relationships and market to some individuals on these lists directly.directly or by including our marketing message in the other company’s marketing materials. If the acquisition of these lists were outlawedwas prohibited or otherwise restricted, our ability to develop new customers and introduce them to our products could be impaired.

Other Risks

Activities relatingIf we cannot attract and retain talented associates our business could suffer. We compete with other companies both within and outside of our industry for talented personnel. If we are not able to our synthetic fuel operationsrecruit, train, develop and retain sufficient numbers of talented associates, we could increase our tax liabilities. The Company earns revenues and generates tax credits from its synthetic fuel operations, which create a fuel that qualifies for tax credits pursuant to Section 29experience increased associate turnover, decreased guest satisfaction, low morale, inefficiency or internal control failures. Insufficient numbers of the Internal Revenue Code. The performance of the synthetic fuel operations depends in part ontalented associates could also limit our ability to utilizegrow and expand our businesses.

Delaware law and our governing corporate documents contain, and our board of directors could implement, anti-takeover provisions that could deter takeover attempts. Under the tax credits,Delaware business combination statute, a stockholder holding 15 percent or more of our outstanding voting stock could not acquire us without board of director’s consent for at least three years after the date the stockholder first held 15 percent or more of the voting stock. Our governing corporate documents also, among other things, require supermajority votes in connection with mergers and similar transactions. In addition, our Board of Directors could, without stockholder approval, implement other anti-takeover defenses, such as a stockholder rights plan to replace the existing stockholder’s rights plan that will expire in March 2008 and which in turn is dependent on our financial performance. If our businesseswe do not generate sufficient profits, we might suffer losses associatedpresently plan to renew.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.Properties.

Company-operated properties are described in Part I, Item 1, “Business,” earlier in this report. We believe our properties are in generally good physical condition with generating tax credits that we were unable to utilize. In addition, the IRS field audit team’s challenge to whether threeneed for only routine repairs and maintenance and periodic capital improvements. Most of our synthetic fuel facilities satisfy statutory placed-in-service requirements could, if ultimately resolved against us, prevent us from realizing projected future tax creditsregional offices and cause us to reverse previously utilized credits, requiring payment of substantial additional taxes. The ability of our synthetic fuel operations to generate tax credits couldreservation centers, both domestically and internationally, are located in leased facilities. We also be adversely impacted by the productivity of these operations, which may be diminished by problems related to supply, production and demand at any of the synthetic fuel facilities, the power plants that buy synthetic fuel from the joint venture or the coal mines where the joint venture buys coal, and by the reduction or elimination of projected future tax credits for synthetic fuel if average crude oil priceslease space in 2005 and beyond exceed certain statutory thresholds, which could affect our ongoing production decisions.

Obligations associated with our exit from the Senior Living Services business may be larger than expected. Our agreement to sell the Senior Living Services business provides for indemnification of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. based on pre-closing events and liabilities resulting from the consummation of the transaction. The amount of the indemnification obligations depends, in large part, on actions of third parties that are outside of our control. As a result, it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of the indemnities, and the amount of these adjustments and indemnities could be larger than expected.

Employee Relations

At December 31, 2004, we had approximately 133,000 employees. Approximately 9,000 employees were represented by labor unions. We believe relations with our employees are positive.

Other Properties

In addition to the operating properties discussed above, we lease fivesix office buildings with combined space of approximately 1.3 million square feet in Maryland and Florida where our corporate, Ritz-Carlton, and Marriott Vacation Club International headquarters are located.

 

We believe our properties are in generally good physical condition with the need for only routine repairs and maintenance and periodic capital improvements.

Internet Address and Company SEC Filings

Our internet address iswww.marriott.com. On the investor relations portion of our web site,www.marriott.com/investor, we provide a link to our electronic SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports. All such filings are available free of charge and are available as soon as reasonably practicable after filing.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

See Item 10 on page 78 of this report for information about our executive officers.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The CTF/HPI arbitration and litigationis described under the caption heading “Litigation and Arbitration” in Footnote 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part II, Item 8, of this annual report and is hereby incorporated by reference.

In addition, on December 22, 2004, P.T. Karang Mas Sejahtera, the owner of The Ritz-Carlton Bali Resort and Spa, filed an action against the Company and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging breach of the operating agreement governing the hotel, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment, interference with contract and conspiracy to breach fiduciary duty. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, an accounting and a declaration that the owner has a right to terminate the operating agreement governing the hotel. On January 21, 2005, we removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed an answer and moved to transfer the action to the District of Maryland. No scheduling order has been entered at this time.

We believe that the claims made against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend against them. However, we cannot assure you as to the outcome of these lawsuits, nor can we currently estimate the range of potential losses to the Company.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are also subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.business, including adjustments proposed during governmental examinations of the various tax returns we file. We currently are not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.

Item 4.Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matters were submitted to a Votevote of Security Holders.shareholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

None.See Part III, Item 10 of this report for information about our executive officers.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information and Dividends

On June 9, 2006, we completed a two-for-one stock split that was effected in the form of a stock dividend. For periods prior to the stock split, all share and per share data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

The range of prices of our common stock and dividends declared per share for each quarterly period within the last two years are as follows:

 

   Stock Price

  

Dividends
Declared Per
Share


   High

  Low

  

2003

            

First Quarter

  $34.89  $28.55  $0.070

Second Quarter

   40.44   31.23   0.075

Third Quarter

   41.59   37.66   0.075

Fourth Quarter

   47.20   40.04   0.075
   Stock Price

  

Dividends
Declared Per
Share


   High

  Low

  

2004

            

First Quarter

  $46.80  $40.64  $0.075

Second Quarter

   51.50   41.82   0.085

Third Quarter

   50.48   44.95   0.085

Fourth Quarter

   63.99   48.15   0.085

      Stock Price  Dividends
Declared Per
Share
      High  Low  

2006

  

First Quarter

  $35.35  $32.32  $0.0525
  

Second Quarter

   38.38   34.20   0.0625
  

Third Quarter

   38.44   34.30   0.0625
  

Fourth Quarter

   48.31   37.19   0.0625
      Stock Price  Dividends
Declared Per
Share
      High  Low  

2007

  

First Quarter

  $51.50  $44.79  $0.0625
  

Second Quarter

   52.00   43.90   0.0750
  

Third Quarter

   48.85   39.70   0.0750
  

Fourth Quarter

   45.10   31.34   0.0750

At February 10, 2005,January 25, 2008, there were 225,768,576354,043,159 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding held by 48,28248,288 shareholders of record. Our Class A Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange, Pacific Stock Exchange and Philadelphiathe Chicago Stock Exchange. The year-end closing price for our stock was $62.98$34.12 on December 31, 2004,28, 2007, and $46.15$47.72 on January 2, 2004.December 29, 2006. All prices are reported on the consolidated transaction reporting system.

Fourth Quarter 20042007 Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

 

Period


  Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased


  Average
Price per
Share


  Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs(1)


  

Maximum

Number of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs(1)


September 11, 2004 – October 8, 2004

  0.1  $48.64  0.1  19.6

October 9, 2004 – November 5, 2004

  —     —    —    19.6

November 6, 2004 – December 3, 2004

  0.8   56.59  0.8  18.8

December 4, 2004 – December 31, 2004

  0.2   61.55  0.2  18.6

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Period

  Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
  Average
Price per
Share
  Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (1)
  Maximum
Number of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (1)

September 8, 2007-October 5, 2007

  1.9  $42.97  1.9  43.4

October 6, 2007-November 2, 2007

  4.6   40.50  4.6  38.8

November 3, 2007-November 30, 2007

  0.9   36.72  0.9  37.9

December 1, 2007-December 28, 2007

  4.7   34.12  4.7  33.2

(1)

On April 30, 2004,August 2, 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors increased, by 2040 million shares, the authorization to repurchase our common stockClass A Common Stock for a total outstanding authorization of approximately 2551 million shares on that date. That authorization is ongoing and does not have an expiration date. We repurchase shares in the open-marketopen market and in privately negotiated transactions.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents a summary of selected historical financial data for the Company derived from our financial statements as of and for the fiveour last eight fiscal years ended December 31, 2004.

years.

Since the information in this table is only a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our financial statements, including the related notes, you should read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

($ in millions, except per share data)

 

  Fiscal Year2

 
  2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

 

Income Statement Data:

                     

Revenues1

  $10,099  $9,014  $8,415  $7,768  $7,911 
   

  

  


 


 


Operating income1

  $477  $377  $321  $420  $762 
   

  

  


 


 


Income from continuing operations

  $594  $476  $439  $269  $490 

Discontinued operations

   2   26   (162)  (33)  (11)
   

  

  


 


 


Net income

  $596  $502  $277  $236  $479 
   

  

  


 


 


Per Share Data:                     

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $2.47  $1.94  $1.74  $1.05  $1.93 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations

   .01   .11   (.64)  (.13)  (.04)
   

  

  


 


 


Diluted earnings per share

  $2.48  $2.05  $1.10  $.92  $1.89 
   

  

  


 


 


Cash dividends declared per share

  $.330  $.295  $.275  $.255  $.235 
   

  

  


 


 


Balance Sheet Data (at end of year):                     

Total assets

  $8,668  $8,177  $8,296  $9,107  $8,237 

Long-term debt1

   836   1,391   1,553   2,708   1,908 

Shareholders’ equity

   4,081   3,838   3,573   3,478   3,267 
Other Data:                     

Base management fees1

   435   388   379   372   383 

Incentive management fees1

   142   109   162   202   316 

Franchise fees1

   296   245   232   220   208 

   Fiscal Year (1) 
($ in millions, except per share data)  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002   2001   2000 

Income Statement Data:

              

Revenues(2)

  $12,990  $11,995  $11,129  $9,778  $8,712  $8,222   $7,768   $7,911 
                                   

Operating income(2)

  $1,188  $1,087  $699  $575  $481  $455   $420   $762 
                                   

Income from continuing operations

  $697  $712  $543  $487  $380  $365   $269   $490 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(3)

   —     (109)  —     —     —     —      —      —   

Discontinued operations(4)

   (1)  5   126   109   122   (88)   (33)   (11)
                                   

Net income

  $696  $608  $669  $596  $502  $277   $236   $479 
                                   

Per Share Data:

              

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $1.75  $1.65  $1.17  $1.01  $0.77  $0.72   $0.52   $0.96 

Diluted loss per share from cumulative effect of accounting change

   —     (0.25)  —     —     —     —      —      —   

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations

   —     0.01   0.28   0.23   0.25   (0.17)   (0.06)   (0.02)
                                   

Diluted earnings per share

  $1.75  $1.41  $1.45  $1.24  $1.02  $0.55   $0.46   $0.94 
                                   

Cash dividends declared per share

  $0.2875  $0.2400  $0.2000  $0.1650  $0.1475  $0.1375   $0.1275   $0.1175 
                                   

Balance Sheet Data (at end of year):

              

Total assets

  $8,942  $8,588  $8,530  $8,668  $8,177  $8,296   $9,107   $8,237 

Long-term debt(2)

   2,790   1,818   1,681   836   1,391   1,553    2,708    1,908 

Shareholders’ equity

   1,429   2,618   3,252   4,081   3,838   3,573    3,478    3,267 

Other Data:

              

Base management fees(2)

  $620  $553  $497  $435  $388  $379   $372   $383 

Franchise fees(2)

   439   390   329   296   245   232    220    208 

Incentive management fees(2)

   369   281   201   142   109   162    202    316 
                                   

Total fees

  $1,428  $1,224  $1,027  $873  $742  $773   $794   $907 
                                   

Fee Revenue-Source:

              

North America(5)

  $1,115  $955  $809  $682  $592  $626   $664   $779 

Outside North America

   313   269   218   191   150   147    130    128 
                                   

Total fees

  $1,428  $1,224  $1,027  $873  $742  $773   $794   $907 
                                   

1(1)

Balances reflect our Senior Living Services and Distribution Services businesses as discontinued operations.
2

All fiscal years included 52 weeks, except for 2002, which included 53 weeks.

(2)

Balances do not reflect the impact of discontinued operations.

(3)

We adopted Statement of Position 04-2 “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions,” in our 2006 first quarter which we reported in our Consolidated Statements of Income as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.

(4)

In 2002, we announced our intent to sell, and subsequently did sell, our Senior Living Services business and exited our Distribution Services business. In 2007, we exited our synthetic fuel business. These businesses are now reflected as discontinued operations.

(5)

Includes the continental United States and Canada.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

BUSINESS AND OVERVIEW

We are a worldwide operator and franchisor of 2,632 hotels2,999 properties (535,093 rooms) and related facilities. The figures in the preceding sentence are as of year-end 2007 and include 21 home and condominium projects (1,916 units) for which we manage the related owners’ associations. In addition, we provided 2,156 furnished corporate housing rental units, which are not included in the totals.

Our operations are grouped into five business segments,segments: North American Full-Service Lodging, Select-ServiceNorth American Limited-Service Lodging, Extended-StayInternational Lodging, TimeshareLuxury Lodging, and Synthetic Fuel. In our Lodging business, weTimeshare. We operate, develop, and franchise under 1319 separate brand names in 6668 countries and territories. We also operate and develop Marriott timeshare properties under four separate brand names.

We earn base, incentive, and franchise fees based upon the terms of our management and franchise agreements. Revenues are also generated from the following sources associated with our timeshare business:Timeshare segment: (1) selling timeshare intervals,interval, fractional ownership, and residential properties; (2) operating the resorts and residential properties; and (3) financing customer purchases of timesharing intervals. We earn revenues from the limited number of hotels we own or lease. Finally, we earn fees in association with affinity card endorsements and the sale of branded residential real estate.

We sell residential real estate in conjunction with luxury hotel development (Ritz-Carlton-Residential) and Timeshare segment projects (Ritz-Carlton Club-Residential and Grand Residences by Marriott-Residential). Our Timeshare segment residential projects are typically opened over time with limited inventory available at any one time. Residences developed in conjunction with hotels are typically constructed and sold by hotel owners with limited amounts, if any, of our capital at risk. While the worldwide residential market is very large, the luxurious nature of our residential properties, the quality and exclusivity associated with our brands, and the hospitality services that we provide, all serve to make our residential products distinctive.

Generally, lodging demand remained strong through 2007, driven by continued strength associated with worldwide business travel. In general, luxury, international, and full-service properties experienced stronger demand than limited-service properties. Strong demand enabled us to increase rates at the property level, which resulted in solid year-over-year RevPAR increases. Revenue mix improvement is a function of the strong demand environment and results as some less profitable business is limited in favor of more profitable business, such as fewer discounted leisure packages in favor of more corporate business. This strategy of shifting business to higher rated tiers, yielded strong year-over-year average daily rate growth and only modest occupancy declines. In addition, we earn revenuesgroup rates continue to increase as business negotiated in earlier years at lower rates is replaced with business negotiated at higher rates.

Demand for our brands is strong in many markets around the world. For our North American comparable properties, RevPAR increases in 2007, as compared to the year-ago period, were particularly strong in Dallas, New York City, Los Angeles, and generate tax credits fromSan Francisco. Internationally, 2007 RevPAR increases as compared to the prior year were particularly strong in Central and South East Asia, South America, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe.

Our approach to improving property-level and above-property productivity has benefited our synthetic fuel joint ventures.

We evaluate the performance of our segments based primarily on the results of the segment without allocating corporate expenses, interest expense and interest income. With the exception of our Synthetic Fuel segment, we do not allocate income taxes to our segments. As timeshare note sales are an integral part of the timeshare business, we include timeshare note sale gains in our timeshare segment results, and we allocate other gainsprofitability, as well as equity income (losses) fromthat of owners and franchisees. Driving room rate improvement, benchmarking successful performance, and leveraging our joint venturessize have all contributed to eachproperty-level margin improvements and higher incentive management fees to us. We continue to enhance the appeal of our segments.proprietary Web site,www.Marriott.com, through functionality and service improvements, and we continue to capture an increasing proportion of property-level reservations via this cost-efficient channel.

Lodging supply growth inOur brands are strong as a result of superior customer service with an emphasis on guest and associate satisfaction, the United States was low during 2004, while demand growth was high. In the United States, demand was strong in the Easternworldwide presence and Western regions, while the Midwestern and South Central regions experienced more moderate increases in demand. Demand associated with business travel improved steadily in 2004, and leisure demand remained high. The weak U.S. dollar in relation to other currencies, particularly the euro, resulted in increased travel into the U.S. as overseas trips for many international travelers were less expensive. Conversely, many U.S. vacationers who might have traveled abroad, traveled domestically instead, as the weak dollar made overseas trips more costly.

Outsidequality of the U.S. we experienced stronger demand versus the prior year, particularly in Asia and the Middle East. While demand in Latin America and the Caribbean was also good, Europe remains a challenge, as some economies have been slow to rebound.

We focus on increasing value for the consumer and “selling the way the customer wants to buy.” Our Look No Further Best Rate Guarantee, strongour brands, our Marriott Rewards loyalty program, an information-rich and information-rich, easyeasy-to-use Web site, a multi-channel central reservations system, and desirable property amenities. We, along with owners and franchisees, continue to use web site encourage customers to make reservations through Marriott.com. We have complete control overinvest in our inventorybrands by means of new, refreshed, and pricing and utilize online agents on an as needed basis. The shift of hotel bookings to our web site from other online channels results in higher revenue, margins and profitability.

By the end of 2004, we had high-speed internet access available in over 2,400 hotels, far outpacing our competition, and we had wireless internet access in lobbies, meeting roomsreinvented properties, new room and public spacesspace designs and enhanced amenities and technology offerings.

In 2007, we announced our agreement with the Nickelodeon division of Viacom, Inc. and Miller Global Properties, LLC to co-develop a new lodging resort brand and concept for travelers seeking fun and adventure, “Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott.” Also during 2007, we announced our agreement with Ian Schrager to create a global boutique lifestyle hotel brand “Edition” on a large scale.

See Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” of this report for important information regarding forward-looking statements made in more than 1,900 hotels.this report and risks and uncertainties that the Company faces.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS

The following discussion presents an analysis of results of our operations for fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004 (which we refer to as “2003”),2007, 2006, and January 3, 2003 (which we refer to as “2002”).

2005.

Continuing Operations

Revenues

20042007 Compared to 20032006

Revenues increased 12 percentby $995 million (8 percent) to $10,099$12,990 million in 2004, primarily reflecting higher fees related to increased2007 from $11,995 million in 2006, as a result of stronger demand for hotel rooms worldwide, which allowed us to increase room rates and favorable exchange rates worldwide. Base management and franchise fees increased by $116 million as a result of stronger RevPAR and unit expansion,growth, as wellwe opened 203 properties (29,200 rooms) throughout 2007. In 2006, we recognized $5 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006, versus no similar fees in 2007. Incentive management fees increased by $88 million due to stronger RevPAR and property-level margin improvements associated with room rate increases and productivity improvements. Incentive management fees included $17 million and $10 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively, that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until the periods in which they were recognized. Furthermore, incentive management fees for 2007 included $13 million and base management fees for 2007 included $6 million of business interruption insurance proceeds associated with hurricanes in prior years compared to $1 million of business interruption insurance proceeds received in 2006. Stronger catering, food and beverage, spa, and other profits also drove property-level margins higher. Year-over-year RevPAR increases were driven primarily by rate increases.

Timeshare sales and services revenue increased by $170 million (11 percent) in 2007 over the prior year. The increase largely reflected development revenue increases over the prior year as strong salessome newer projects reached revenue recognition thresholds. In 2006, some projects were in our Timeshare segment.the early stages of development and did not reach revenue recognition thresholds until 2007. The increase in revenue also reflects increased services and financing revenue.

Owned, leased, corporate housing and other revenue increased by $121 million (11 percent). The increase largely reflected stronger RevPAR and the mix of owned and leased properties in 2007, as compared to 2006, and to a lesser extent, higher fees associated with affinity card endorsements and the sale of branded residential real estate, offset by the recognition of $19 million of hotel management and franchise agreement termination fees in 2007, as compared to the recognition of $26 million of such fees in 2006.

2003 ComparedThe $995 million increase in total revenue includes $500 million of increased cost reimbursements revenue, to 2002

Revenues increased 7 percent to $9,014$8,575 million in 2003, reflecting revenue2007 from new lodging properties, partially offset by lower demand for hotel rooms and consequently lower fees to us.

Operating Income

2004 Compared to 2003

Operating income increased $100 million to $477$8,075 million in 2004.the prior year. This revenue represents reimbursements of costs incurred on behalf of managed and franchised properties and relates, predominantly, to payroll costs at managed properties where we are the employer. As we record cost reimbursements based upon the costs incurred with no added markup, this revenue and related expense have no impact on either our operating income or net income. The increase in reimbursed costs is primarily dueattributable to higher fees, which are related both to stronger REVPAR, driven by increased occupancywage increases, sales growth, and average daily rate, and to the

growth in the number of properties we manage. We added 15 managed properties (4,870 rooms) and 138 franchised properties (15,963 rooms) to our system in 2007, net of properties exiting the system.

2006 Compared to 2005

Revenues increased by $866 million (8 percent) to $11,995 million in 2006 from $11,129 million in 2005, as a result of stronger demand for hotel rooms worldwide. Base management and strong timesharefranchise fees increased by $117 million as a result of stronger RevPAR and unit growth. In 2006, we recognized $5 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006. Incentive management fees increased by $80 million due to stronger RevPAR and property-level margin improvements associated with room rate increases and productivity improvements. Incentive management fees include $10 million and $14 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively, that were calculated based on prior periods’ earnings but not earned and due until the periods in which they were recognized. Stronger catering, food and beverage, spa, and other profits also drove property-level margins higher. Year-over-year RevPAR increases were driven primarily by rate increases. Owned and leased revenue increased significantly, primarily as a result of our purchase, early in the second half of 2005, of 13 formerly managed properties from CTF Holdings Ltd. (“CTF”). See Footnote No. 8, “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” later in this report for a detailed description of the CTF transaction. As planned, eight of the CTF properties were sold during 2006: one property was sold in the first quarter; five properties were sold in the second quarter; and two properties were sold in the third quarter.

Timeshare sales and services revenue increased by $90 million (6 percent) over the prior year. The increase largely reflects $77 million of revenue in 2006 from note securitization gains. As detailed later in the “Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle” narrative, note securitization gains of $69 million for 2005 are mainlynot reflected in revenue, but instead are a component of gains and other income. Additionally, financing and services revenue increased in 2006 versus the prior year, as did villa rental revenue. Partially offsetting these increases, development revenue declined due to projects in the early stages of development that did not reach revenue recognition thresholds and limited available inventory associated with projects that sold out or were nearing sell-out.

The $866 million increase in total revenue includes $404 million of increased cost reimbursements revenue, to $8,075 million in 2006 from $7,671 million in the prior year. The increase in reimbursed costs is primarily attributable to strong demandthe growth in the number of properties we manage and improved margins,to wage increases. We added 13 managed properties (4,126 rooms) and 77 franchised properties (11,286 rooms) to our system in 2006, net of properties exiting the system.

Operating Income

2007 Compared to 2006

Operating income increased by $101 million (9 percent) to $1,188 million in 2007 from $1,087 million in the prior year. The increase in operating income reflects stronger combined base management, incentive management, and franchise fees of $204 million, partially offset by higher general, administrative, and administrative expenses. General,other expenses of $91 million, lower Timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses of $7 million, and lower owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses of $5 million.

The combined base management, incentive management, and franchise fees increase of $204 million reflected strong RevPAR growth, unit growth, and property-level margin improvements and favorable exchange rates worldwide. In 2006, we recognized $5 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006, versus no similar fees in 2007. Incentive management fees included $17 million and $10 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively, that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until the periods in which they were recognized. Furthermore, incentive management fees for 2007 included $13 million and base management fees included $6 million of business interruption insurance proceeds associated with hurricanes in prior years compared to $1 million of business interruption insurance proceeds received in 2006.

As compared to the year-ago period, general, administrative, and other expenses increased $84by $91 million (13 percent) from $677 million in 20042006 to $607$768 million primarily reflecting higher administrative expenses in both our lodging ($55 million) and timeshare businesses ($24 million), primarily2007. In 2007, we incurred a $35 million charge related to excise taxes associated with the settlement of issues raised during the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor examination of our employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) feature of our Employees’ Profit Sharing, Retirement and Savings Plan and Trust (the “Plan”). See Footnote No. 3, “Income Taxes,” for additional information on the ESOP settlement. Additionally, the increase was attributable to, among other things, increased overhead costs related to the Company’sour unit growth, development and systems improvements, increased litigation expenses, and increased development costs primarily associated with our Timeshare segment,other administrative costs. Also unfavorably impacting general, administrative, and a $10other expenses, when compared to the prior year, were foreign exchange losses totaling $2 million reduction in 2007 as compared to foreign exchange gains offset byof $6 million in 2006 and $1 million of guarantee charges in 2007 while the year-ago period reflected $6 million of guarantee reversals. Partially offsetting the aforementioned increases were $4 million of lower hotel operating agreement performance cure payments in 2007 as compared to 2006 and a $9 million reversal in 2007 of reserves that were no longer required. Increased legal expenses in 2007 include charges associated with litigation expenses.and other legal matters. Of the $91 million increase in total general, administrative, and other expenses, an increase of $13 million was attributable to our Lodging segments and a $78 million increase was unallocated.

Timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses of $350 million decreased by $7 million, as compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting flat development revenue net of product costs and marketing and selling costs and $12 million of increased financing revenue net of financing expenses, more than offset by the reversal in 2006 of $15 million reversal of contingency reserves and $4 million of lower services revenue net of services expenses. Flat development revenue net of product costs and marketing and selling costs reflected newer projects that reached reportability thresholds in 2007, offset by several other projects that were approaching sell-out. The increase in financing revenue net of financing costs primarily reflects increased accretion, interest income, and higher note sale gains in 2007, as compared to 2006.

The $5 million decrease in owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses reflected $19 million in hotel management and franchise agreement termination fees received in 2007, as compared to $26 million in 2006. Depreciation charges totaling $8 million were recorded in 2007 associated with one owned

property that was reclassified from “held for sale” to “held and used” during 2007 as compared to depreciation charges recorded in 2006 of $7 million associated with two properties that were reclassified from “held for sale” to “held and used.” Partially offsetting the aforementioned decreases in owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses was the favorable impact of $4 million associated with both the stronger demand environment in 2007 and the impact of the sale and purchase of several properties.

20032006 Compared to 20022005

Operating income increased 17 percentby $388 million (56 percent) to $377$1,087 million in 2003.2006 from $699 million in the prior year. The favorable comparisonsincrease in 2006 is, in part, due to 2002 includea combined base management, franchise, and incentive management fee increase of $197 million, reflecting stronger RevPAR growth, unit growth, and property-level margin improvements. Stronger owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses contributed $17 million of the improvement in operating income and reflected the strong demand environment in 2006 and the impact of the $50CTF hotel properties acquired in 2005. The $17 million write downimprovement in 2006 versus the prior year reflects increased owned and leased results of goodwill recorded$20 million, a $12 million increase in 2002 associated with our ExecuStay business, the 2003 receipt of $36hotel management and franchise agreement termination fees received and $5 million of insurance proceeds associated with lost management fees resulting from the destruction of the Marriott World Trade Center hotel and lower 2003 operating losses from our synthetic fuel operation. In 2003, the synthetic fuel business generated operating losses of $104 million, compared to $134 million in 2002. Operatinghigher other income, in 2003 was hurtpartially offset by $53$20 million of lower incentive fees, which resultedland lease income. Also reflected in the year-over-year change in owned and leased results are depreciation charges totaling $7 million recorded in 2006 associated with two properties that were reclassified in 2006 from “held for sale” to “held and used.” The depreciation charges totaling $7 million represented the weak operating environmentamount that would have been recognized had the two properties been continuously classified as “held and used.”

Timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses increased by $98 million (38 percent) in domestic lodging. General,2006 and largely reflects $77 million of revenue in 2006 from note securitization gains. As noted earlier in the “Revenue” discussion, note securitization gains of $69 million for 2005 are not reflected in revenue, but instead are a component of gains and other income. Also reflected in the $98 million favorable variance, development revenue net of expenses increased by $14 million and financing, services and other revenue net of expenses increased by $7 million. Increased development revenue net of expenses primarily reflects lower development expenses associated with projects in 2006 in the early stages of development that did not reach revenue recognition thresholds and the timing of expenses associated with Statement of Position 04-2, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions” (“SOP 04-2”), implemented in 2006. Increased financing, services and other revenue net of expenses reflects a $15 million reversal of marketing related contingency reserves in 2006.

As compared to the year-ago period, general, administrative, and other expenses increased $13decreased by $76 million (10 percent) to $677 million in 20032006 from $753 million in 2005. In 2005, we incurred general, administrative, and other expenses of $94 million primarily due to $523the non-cash write-off of deferred contract acquisition costs associated with the termination of management agreements resulting from the CTF transaction. We also incurred general, administrative, and other expenses of $30 million reflecting higher litigationin 2005 associated with our bedding incentive program. We implemented the bedding incentive program in the 2005 second quarter to help ensure that guests could enjoy the comfort and luxury of our new bedding by year-end 2005. Further impacting general, administrative, and other expenses, related to two continuing2005 reflected hotel operating agreement performance cure payments of $15 million versus a $6 million similar payment in 2006, and previously disclosed lawsuits, partially offset by2005 also reflected $9 million of guarantee charges associated with three properties versus the impactreversal of an additional $5 million of guarantee charges in 2006. Additionally, impacting the additional week in 2002 (our 2002 fiscal year included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks in 2003). Theyear-over-year general, administrative, and other expenses also reflectvariance were foreign exchange gains of $7totaling $6 million in 2006 as compared to losses of $6$5 million in 2002.2005. Also impacting the year-over-year change in general, administrative, and other expenses, an additional $22 million reflects unit growth, systems improvements, higher program and joint venture development expenses, and customary increases in ordinary costs such as wages and benefits. Development expenses and deferred compensation expenses were higher in 2006 by $15 million and $5 million, respectively. As noted under the heading “New Accounting Standards” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” section of our 2006 Form 10-K, we adopted a new accounting standard in 2006 associated with share-based compensation. This new standard resulted in incremental general, administrative, and other expenses of $39 million versus 2005, primarily impacting the unallocated portion of our general, administrative, and other expenses. Of the $76 million decrease in total general, administrative, and other expenses, a decrease of $124 million was attributable to our Lodging segments and a $48 million increase was unallocated.

Gains and Other Income (Expense)

The following table below shows our gains and other income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 2003.2005:

 

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Timeshare note sale gains

  $64  $64  $60

Synthetic fuel earn-out payments received, net

   28   —     —  

Gains on sales of real estate

   44   21   28

Gains on sales of joint venture investments

   19   21   44

Other

   9   —     —  
   

  

  

   $164  $106  $132
   

  

  

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005

Timeshare note sale gains

  $—    $—    $69

Gains on sales of real estate and other

   39   26   34

Loss on expected land sale

   —     (37)  —  

Other note sale/repayment gains

   1   2   25

Gains on forgiveness of debt

   12   —     —  

Gain on sale/income on redemption of joint venture and other investments

   31   68   7

Income from cost method joint ventures

   14   15   14
            
  $97  $74  $149
            

2007 Compared to 2006

The $12 million gain on forgiveness of debt for 2007 was associated with government incentives. The loans were forgiven in recognition of our contribution to job growth and economic development. Gain on sale/income on redemption of joint venture and other investments of $31 million in 2007 reflected an $18 million gain associated with the sale of stock we held and net gains totaling $13 million on the sale of joint venture investments. Gain on sale/income on redemption of joint venture and other investments of $68 million in 2006 comprised $43 million of net gains associated with the sale of joint venture investments and the redemption of preferred stock we held in one investee which generated a gain of $25 million.

2006 Compared to 2005

Gain on sale/income on redemption of joint venture and other investments of $68 million in 2006 represents $43 million of net gains associated with the sale of joint venture and other investments and $25 million of income associated with the redemption of preferred stock we held in one investee. As further explained in the earlier “Revenues” discussion for 2006, Timeshare segment note sale gains of $77 million in 2006 are presented in the “Timeshare sales and services” revenue caption.

Interest Expense

20042007 Compared to 20032006

Interest expense decreased $11 million to $99 million, reflecting the repayment of $234 million of senior debt in the fourth quarter of 2003 and other subsequent debt reductions, partially offset by lower capitalized interest resulting from fewer projects under construction, primarily related to our Timeshare segment.

2003 Compared to 2002

Interest expense increased $24by $60 million (48 percent) to $110$184 million for 2007 from $124 million in 2006. Of the $60 million increase over 2006, $78 million was due to: $26 million of higher interest reflecting a higher outstanding commercial paper balance, primarily due to increased share repurchases and the ESOP settlement payments, and related interest rates; $25 million of interest associated with our Series H Senior Notes issuance which occurred late in 2006 and our Series I and Series J Senior Notes issuances which occurred in 2007; a charge of $13 million in 2007 related to the ESOP settlement; charges totaling $53 million and $46 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, relating to interest on accumulated cash inflows in advance of our cash outflows for various programs that we operate on the owners’ behalf including Marriott Rewards, gift certificates, and self-insurance programs; interest totaling $5 million associated with other additional debt; and the write off of $2 million of deferred financing costs associated with the refinancing of our revolving credit agreement in 2007. See Footnote No. 3, “Income Taxes,” for additional information on the ESOP settlement. The increase in interest on the mortgage debt assumedprograms we operate on behalf of the owners over the year-ago period is attributable to higher liability balances and higher interest rates. Partially offsetting the $78 million interest expense increases over 2006 was an $18 million favorable variance to last year for higher capitalized interest associated with construction projects.

2006 Compared to 2005

Interest expense increased by $18 million (17 percent) to $124 million in 2006 from $106 million in 2005. Included within interest expense for 2006 and 2005 are charges totaling $46 million and $29 million, respectively, relating to interest on accumulated cash inflows, in advance of our cash outflows for various programs that we operate on the fourth quarter of 2002owners’ behalf. The increase in interest on these programs over 2005 is related to higher liability balances and higher interest rates. Interest expense also increased in 2006, due to our June 2005 Series F Notes issuance, our June 2006 Series H Notes issuance, and higher commercial paper balances coupled with higher rates. Partially offsetting these increases were interest expense declines associated with the acquisitionpayoff, at maturity, of 14 senior living communities,both our Series D Notes in April 2005 and lower capitalized interest resulting from fewer projects under construction, primarily related toSeries B Notes in November 2005, and the exchange of our Timeshare segment. In the fourth quarter of 2003, $234 million of senior debt was repaid. The weighted averageSeries C and Series E Notes for lower interest rate on the repaid debt was 7 percent.Series G Notes in 2005.

Interest Income, Provision for Loan Losses, and Income Tax

20042007 Compared to 20032006

Interest income, before the provision for loan losses, increased $17decreased by $11 million (13(22 percent) to $146$38 million in 2007 from $49 million in 2006, primarily reflecting higher loan balances, including the $200 million note collected in the third quarter of 2004 related to the acquisition by Cendant Corporation of our interest in the Two Flags joint venture and higher interest rates. We recognized $9 million oflower interest income associated with loans that have been repaid to us, partially offset by the $200impact associated with new loan fundings.

Loan loss provisions increased by $20 million note,versus the prior year primarily reflecting a $12 million charge associated with one property and a $5 million charge to write off our remaining exposure associated with our investment in a Delta Airlines, Inc. (“Delta”) lease versus loan loss reversals of $3 million in 2006. For additional information regarding the Delta lease investment write-off, see the “Investment in Leveraged Lease” caption later in this report.

Our tax provision increased by $61 million (16 percent) from a tax provision of $380 million in 2006 to a tax provision of $441 million in 2007 and reflected higher pretax income from our Lodging segments as well as a higher tax rate in 2007, primarily reflecting both increased taxes associated with our international operations and a less favorable mix of taxable earnings between countries. Increased taxes also reflect a charge for a German legislative tax change in 2007, which was issued earlyhad a one-time impact and $6 million of taxes in 2007 associated with additional interest on the 2004 second quarter. OurESOP settlement. See Footnote No. 3, “Income Taxes,” for additional information on the ESOP settlement.

2006 Compared to 2005

Interest income, before the provision for loan losses, for 2004 was a benefitdecreased by $30 million (38 percent) to $49 million in 2006 from $79 million in 2005, primarily reflecting the impact of $8loans repaid to us in 2005. Loan loss provisions decreased by $31 million and includes $3 million of reserves for loans deemed uncollectible at three hotels, offset byversus the prior year reflecting the reversal of $11 million of reserves no longer deemed necessary.

Income from continuing operations before income taxes generated a tax provision of $100loan loss provisions totaling $3 million in 2004,2006 compared to a tax benefitcharge of $43$17 million in 2003. The difference is primarily attributable2005 due to the impactimpairment of our Delta lease, see the synthetic fuel joint venture, which generated a“Investment in Leveraged Lease” caption later in this report for additional information and an $11 million loan loss provision in 2005 associated with one property.

Our tax benefit and tax credits of $165provision totaled $380 million in 2004, compared to $245 million in 2003 and to higher pre-tax income. In the third quarter of 2003, we sold a 50 percent interest in our synthetic fuel joint ventures, and we currently consolidate the joint ventures.

2003 Compared to 2002

Interest income increased $7 million (6 percent) to $129 million. Our provision for loan losses for 2003 was $7 million and includes $15 million of reserves for loans deemed uncollectible at six hotels, offset by the reversal of $8 million of reserves no longer deemed necessary.

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest generated a tax benefit of $43 million in 2003,2006 compared to a tax provision of $32$284 million in 2002.2005. The difference of $96 million is primarily attributable to the impact ofhigher taxes in 2006 associated with higher pretax income from our synthetic fuel operation, which generated a tax benefit and tax credits of $245lodging operations.

Equity in Earnings

2007 Compared to 2006

Equity in earnings increased by $12 million from $3 million in 2003,2006 to $15 million in 2007 and reflected the mix of investments, compared to $2082006, and stronger results at several joint ventures reflecting the strong lodging demand environment in 2007, for one joint venture, the reopening of a hotel, late in 2006, in Mexico, which had been closed following a hurricane in 2005 and strong demand in 2007 for our timeshare products in Hawaii.

2006 Compared to 2005

The $33 million decline from earnings of $36 million in 2002. Excluding2005 to earnings of $3 million in 2006, attributable to our equity investments, reflected the impactrecognition in 2005 of the synthetic fuel operation, our pre-tax income was lower in 2003, which also contributed to the favorable tax impact.

Our effective tax rate for discontinued operations increased$30 million of equity earnings from 15.7 percent to 39 percent due to the impact of the taxes in 2002 associated with the sale of stock in connection with the disposal of our Senior Living Services business.

Minority Interest

Minority interest increased from an expense of $55 million in 2003 to a benefit of $40 million in 2004, primarily as a result of the change in the ownership structure of the synthetic fuelhotels by three equity joint ventures following our sale of 50 percent of our interest in thewhich we had equity interests. In addition, since 2005 we have sold several equity joint ventures. Due to the purchaser’s put option, which expired on November 6, 2003, minority interest for 2003 reflected our partner’s share of the synthetic fuel operating losses and their share of the associated tax benefit, along with their share of the tax credits from the June 21, 2003, sale date through the put option’s expiration date, when we began accounting for the ventures under the equity method of accounting. For 2004, minority interest reflects our partner’s share of the synthetic fuel losses from March 26, 2004, (when we began consolidating the ventures due to the adoption of FIN 46(R)) through year-end. For additional information, see the discussion relating to our “Synthetic Fuel” segment on page 31.

Income from Continuing Operations

20042007 Compared to 20032006

IncomeCompared to 2006, income from continuing operations increased 25 percentdecreased by $15 million (2 percent) to $594$697 million in 2007, and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations increased 27 percentby $0.10 (6 percent) to $2.47. The favorable results were primarily driven by strong hotel demand, new unit growth, strong timeshare results,$1.75. As discussed in more detail in the preceding sections beginning with “Operating Income,” the decrease versus the prior year is due to higher general, administrative, and other expenses ($91 million), higher taxes ($61 million), higher interest income reflectingexpense ($60 million), higher balances and rates,loan loss provision ($20 million), lower interest expense due to debt reductions,income ($11 million), lower loan loss provisions, stronger synthetic fueltimeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses ($7 million), and lower owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses ($5 million). Partially offsetting these unfavorable variances were higher fee income ($204 million), higher gains and other income ($23 million), higher equity investment results ($12 million), and increased gains of $58 million, partially offset bya higher income taxes excluding the synthetic fuel impact, and higher general and administrative expenses.minority interest benefit ($1 million).

20032006 Compared to 20022005

IncomeCompared to 2005, income from continuing operations increased 8 percentby $169 million (31 percent) to $476$712 million in 2006, and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations advanced 11 percentincreased by $0.48 (41 percent) to $1.94. Synthetic fuel operations contributed $96 million$1.65. As discussed in 2003 compared to $74 million in 2002. Our lodging financial results declined $5 million to $702 million in 2003. The comparisons from 2002 benefit from the $50 million pre-tax charge to write down acquisition goodwill for ExecuStay in 2002, offset by the $44 million pre-tax gain on the sale of our investment in Interval International in 2002, and further benefit from our 2003 receipt of a $36 million insurance settlement for lost management fees associated with the New York Marriott World Trade Center hotel, which was destroyedmore detail in the 2001 terrorist attacks.

Marriott Lodging

We consider lodging revenues and lodging financial results to be meaningful indicators of our performance because they measure our growth in profitability as a lodging company and enable investors to comparepreceding sections beginning with “Operating Income,” the sales and results of our lodging operations to those of other lodging companies.

Revenues

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Full-Service

  $6,611  $5,876  $5,508

Select-Service

   1,118   1,000   967

Extended-Stay

   547   557   600

Timeshare

   1,502   1,279   1,147
   

  

  

Total lodging

   9,778   8,712   8,222

Synthetic Fuel

   321   302   193
   

  

  

   $10,099  $9,014  $8,415
   

  

  

Income from Continuing Operations

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Full-Service

  $426  $407  $397 

Select-Service

   140   99   130 

Extended-Stay

   66   47   (3)

Timeshare

   203   149   183 
   


 


 


Total lodging financial results

   835   702   707 

Synthetic Fuel (after-tax)

   107   96   74 

Unallocated corporate expenses

   (138)  (132)  (126)

Interest income, provision for loan losses and interest expense

   55   12   24 

Income taxes (excluding Synthetic Fuel)

   (265)  (202)  (240)
   


 


 


   $594  $476  $439 
   


 


 


2004 Compared to 2003

Lodging, which includes our Full-Service, Select-Service, Extended-Stay and Timeshare segments, reported financial results of $835 million in 2004, compared to $702 million in 2003, and revenues of $9,778 million in 2004, a 12 percent increase from revenues of $8,712 million in 2003. The results reflect an 18 percent increase in base, franchise and incentive fees from $742 million in 2003 to $873 million in 2004, favorable timeshare results and increased gains and joint venture results of $36 million. The increase in base and franchise fees was driven by higher REVPAR for comparable rooms, primarily resulting from both domestic and international occupancy and average daily rate increases and new unit growth. Systemwide REVPAR for comparable North American properties increased 8.5 percent, and REVPAR for our comparable North American company-operated properties increased 8.6 percent. Systemwide REVPAR for comparable international properties, including The Ritz-Carlton, increased 14.2 percent, and REVPAR for comparable international company-operated properties, including The Ritz-Carlton, increased 16.6 percent. The increase in incentive management fees during the year primarily reflects the impact of increased international demand, particularly in Asia and the Middle East, and increased business at properties throughout North America. We have added 166 properties (27,038 rooms) and deflagged 42 properties (7,335 rooms) since year-end 2003. Most of the deflagged properties were Fairfield Inns. In addition, 210 properties (28,081 rooms) exited our system as a result of the sale of our Ramada International Hotels & Resorts franchised brand. Worldwide REVPAR for comparable company-operated properties increased 10.5 percent, while worldwide REVPAR for comparable systemwide properties increased 9.6 percent.

2003 Compared to 2002

Lodging, which includes our Full-Service, Select-Service, Extended-Stay and Timeshare segments, reported financial results of $702 million in 2003, compared to $707 million in 2002, and revenues of $8,712 million in 2003, a 6 percent increase, compared to revenues of $8,222 million in 2002. The 2003 lodging revenue and financial results include the receipt of a $36 million insurance settlement for lost revenues associated with the New York World Trade Center hotel. Our revenues from base management fees totaled $388 million, an increase of 2 percent, reflecting 3 percent growth in the number of managed rooms and a 1.9 percent decline in REVPAR for our North American managed hotels. Incentive management fees were $109 million, a decline of 33 percent, reflecting lower property-level house profit. House profit margins declined 2.7 percentage points, largely due to lower average room rates, higher wages, insurance and utility costs, and lower telephone profits, offset by continued productivity improvements. Franchise fees totaled $245 million, an increase of 6 percent. The comparison to 2002 includes the impact of the $50 million pre-tax write down of ExecuStay goodwill recorded in 2002, partially offset by a $44 million pre-tax gain related to the sale of our investment in Interval International.

Lodging Development

We opened 144 properties totaling 24,380 rooms, excluding Ramada International, across our brands in 2004, and 42 properties (7,335 rooms) were deflagged and exited the system. In addition, 210 properties (28,081 rooms) exited our system as a result of the sale of our Ramada International Hotels & Resorts franchised brand in 2004. Highlights of the year included:

We converted 64 properties (10,565 rooms), or 39 percent of our total room additions for the year, from other brands.

We opened over 30 percent of new rooms outside the United States.

We added 109 properties (12,859 rooms) to our Select-Service and Extended-Stay brands.

We opened our first Bulgari Hotel & Resort in Milan, Italy, in May 2004. The second property is expected to open in Bali in 2005.

We opened three new Marriott Vacation Club International properties in Aruba; Phoenix, Arizona; and Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

We currently have more than 55,000 rooms in our development pipeline and expect to add 25,000 to 30,000 hotel rooms and timeshare units to our system in 2005. We expect to deflag approximately 4,000 rooms during 2005. These growth plans are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. See “Forward-Looking Statements” above and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

REVPAR

We consider Revenue per Available Room (REVPAR) to be a meaningful indicator of our performance because it measures the period-over-period change in room revenues for comparable properties. We calculate REVPAR by dividing room sales for comparable properties by room nights available to guests for the period. REVPAR may not be comparable to similarly titled measures, such as revenues.

The following table shows occupancy, average daily rate and REVPAR for each of our comparable principal established brands. We have not presented statistics for company-operated North American Fairfield Inn and SpringHill Suites properties here (or in the comparable information for the prior years presented later in this report) because we operate only a limited number of properties, as both of these brands are predominantly franchised and such information would not be meaningful for those brands (identified as “nm” in the tables below). Systemwide statistics include data from our franchised properties, in addition to our owned, leased and managed properties.

For North American properties (except for The Ritz-Carlton, which includes January through December), the occupancy, average daily rate and REVPAR statistics used throughout this report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, include the period from January 3, 2004, through December 31, 2004, while the statistics for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2004, include the period from January 4, 2003, through January 2, 2004.

   Comparable Company-Operated
North American Properties


  Comparable Systemwide
North American Properties


 
   2004

  Change vs. 2003

  2004

  Change vs. 2003

 

Marriott Hotels & Resorts(1)

               

Occupancy

   72.0% 2.8%pts.  70.1% 2.8%pts.

Average daily rate

  $143.70  3.3% $135.15  3.3%

REVPAR

  $103.46  7.4% $94.77  7.6%

The Ritz-Carlton(2)

               

Occupancy

   69.2% 4.3%pts.  69.2% 4.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $257.16  5.9% $257.16  5.9%

REVPAR

  $177.96  12.9% $177.96  12.9%

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

               

Occupancy

   69.6% 4.3%pts.  69.1% 4.2%pts.

Average daily rate

  $135.54  1.7% $128.67  2.3%

REVPAR

  $94.30  8.4% $88.92  8.9%

Composite – Full-Service(3)

               

Occupancy

   71.3% 3.2%pts.  69.9% 3.1%pts.

Average daily rate

  $153.66  3.6% $142.80  3.6%

REVPAR

  $109.62  8.4% $99.82  8.4%

Residence Inn

               

Occupancy

   79.0% 2.7%pts.  78.6% 2.9%pts.

Average daily rate

  $99.49  3.8% $97.33  3.2%

REVPAR

  $78.59  7.4% $76.52  7.1%

Courtyard

               

Occupancy

   70.3% 3.2%pts.  71.4% 3.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $96.30  4.6% $97.18  4.9%

REVPAR

  $67.66  9.6% $69.35  10.0%

Fairfield Inn

               

Occupancy

   nm  nm   66.6% 1.9%pts.

Average daily rate

   nm  nm  $67.97  3.1%

REVPAR

   nm  nm  $45.29  6.2%

TownePlace Suites

               

Occupancy

   74.1% 3.7%pts.  74.9% 4.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $65.77  4.0% $65.18  2.7%

REVPAR

  $48.71  9.5% $48.81  9.0%

SpringHill Suites

               

Occupancy

   nm  nm   71.5% 4.2%pts.

Average daily rate

   nm  nm  $83.97  4.2%

REVPAR

   nm  nm  $60.04  10.6%

Composite – Select-Service and Extended-Stay(4)

               

Occupancy

   72.6% 3.1%pts.  72.2% 3.0%pts.

Average daily rate

  $94.52  4.4% $87.89  4.0%

REVPAR

  $68.66  9.1% $63.42  8.5%

Composite – All(5)

               

Occupancy

   71.8% 3.2%pts.  71.2% 3.1%pts.

Average daily rate

  $132.36  3.8% $111.49  3.8%

REVPAR

  $95.04  8.6% $79.35  8.5%


(1)Marriott Hotels & Resorts includes our JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts brand.
(2)Statistics for The Ritz-Carlton are for January through December.
(3)Full-Service composite statistics include properties for the Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts and The Ritz-Carlton brands.

(4)Select-Service and Extended-Stay composite statistics include properties for the Courtyard, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, Fairfield Inn and SpringHill Suites brands.
(5)Composite – All statistics include properties for the Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, The Ritz-Carlton, Courtyard, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, Fairfield Inn and SpringHill Suites brands.

Systemwide international statistics by region are based on comparable worldwide units, excluding North America. The following table shows occupancy, average daily rate and REVPAR for international properties by region/brand.

   Comparable Company-Operated
International Properties(1), (2)


  Comparable Systemwide
International Properties(1), (2)


 
   Year Ended
December 31, 2004


  Change vs. 2003

  Year Ended
December 31, 2004


  Change vs. 2003

 

Caribbean and Latin America

               

Occupancy

   71.2% 4.3%pts.  69.7% 4.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $138.98  8.0% $131.61  7.7%

REVPAR

  $98.91  14.9% $91.76  14.7%

Continental Europe

               

Occupancy

   70.8% 2.8%pts.  68.8% 3.7%pts.

Average daily rate

  $130.49  2.6% $130.74  2.2%

REVPAR

  $92.38  6.8% $89.91  8.0%

United Kingdom

               

Occupancy

   76.9% 2.0%pts.  74.4% 2.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $173.48  7.8% $142.47  3.1%

REVPAR

  $133.37  10.7% $106.01  6.4%

Middle East and Africa

               

Occupancy

   73.2% 8.1%pts.  73.2% 8.1%pts.

Average daily rate

  $83.44  13.8% $83.44  13.8%

REVPAR

  $61.10  28.1% $61.10  28.1%

Asia Pacific(3)

               

Occupancy

   75.5% 9.8%pts.  76.4% 9.0%pts.

Average daily rate

  $96.67  10.5% $99.61  8.2%

REVPAR

  $72.98  27.0% $76.11  22.6%

The Ritz-Carlton International

               

Occupancy

   71.0% 10.3%pts.  71.0% 10.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $205.06  3.8% $205.06  3.8%

REVPAR

  $145.68  21.3% $145.68  21.3%

Total Composite International (4)

               

Occupancy

   73.3% 6.6%pts.  72.9% 6.0%pts.

Average daily rate

  $129.35  6.0% $128.44  4.8%

REVPAR

  $94.75  16.6% $93.61  14.2%

Total Worldwide(5)

               

Occupancy

   72.2% 4.0%pts.  71.5% 3.6%pts.

Average daily rate

  $131.58  4.3% $114.61  4.1%

REVPAR

  $94.97  10.5% $81.93  9.6%

(1)International financial results are reported on a period-end basis, while international statistics are reported on a month-end basis.
(2)The comparison to 2003 is on a currency-neutral basis and includes results for January through December.
(3)Excludes Hawaii.
(4)Includes Hawaii.
(5)Includes international statistics for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and North American statistics for the fifty-two weeks ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004.

The following table shows occupancy, average daily rate and REVPAR for each of our principal established brands.

   Comparable Company-Operated
North American Properties


  Comparable Systemwide
North American Properties


 
   2003

  Change vs. 2002

  2003

  Change vs. 2002

 

Marriott Hotels & Resorts(1)

               

Occupancy

   69.3% -0.5%pts.  67.6% -0.4%pts.

Average daily rate

  $135.42  -2.1% $128.53  -1.8%

REVPAR

  $93.81  -2.8% $86.87  -2.4%

The Ritz-Carlton(2)

               

Occupancy

   65.7% 1.1%pts.  65.7% 1.1%pts.

Average daily rate

  $231.12  -0.8% $231.12  -0.8%

REVPAR

  $151.85  1.0% $151.85  1.0%

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

               

Occupancy

   65.8% 0.9%pts.  65.3% 1.5%pts.

Average daily rate

  $132.12  -1.8% $123.97  -2.2%

REVPAR

  $86.99  -0.4% $80.92  0.1%

Composite – Full-Service(3)

               

Occupancy

   68.4% -0.1%pts.  67.1% 0.0%pts.

Average daily rate

  $144.17  -1.6% $134.92  -1.6%

REVPAR

  $98.65  -1.8% $90.57  -1.6%

Residence Inn

               

Occupancy

   77.0% -0.3%pts.  76.2% 0.2%pts.

Average daily rate

  $94.94  -1.9% $93.85  -1.4%

REVPAR

  $73.09  -2.3% $71.47  -1.1%

Courtyard

               

Occupancy

   67.6% -1.0%pts.  68.5% -0.6%pts.

Average daily rate

  $93.16  -1.2% $92.90  -0.6%

REVPAR

  $63.01  -2.7% $63.65  -1.4%

Fairfield Inn

               

Occupancy

   nm  nm   64.1% -0.3%pts.

Average daily rate

   nm  nm  $64.28  0.2%

REVPAR

   nm  nm  $41.22  -0.4%

TownePlace Suites

               

Occupancy

   70.3% -2.0%pts.  70.9% 0.0%pts.

Average daily rate

  $63.24  1.8% $63.34  -0.2%

REVPAR

  $44.48  -1.0% $44.89  -0.1%

SpringHill Suites

               

Occupancy

   nm  nm   68.4% 1.3%pts.

Average daily rate

   nm  nm  $80.38  1.3%

REVPAR

   nm  nm  $54.94  3.2%

Composite – Select-Service and Extended-Stay(4)

               

Occupancy

   70.0% -0.8%pts.  69.2% -0.2%pts.

Average daily rate

  $90.98  -1.1% $83.70  -0.6%

REVPAR

  $63.64  -2.2% $57.95  -0.8%

Composite – All(5)

               

Occupancy

   69.0% -0.4%pts.  68.3% -0.1%pts.

Average daily rate

  $124.45  -1.4% $105.86  -1.1%

REVPAR

  $85.85  -1.9% $72.31  -1.3%

(1)Marriott Hotels & Resorts includes our JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts brand.
(2)Statistics for The Ritz-Carlton are for January through December.
(3)Full-Service composite statistics include properties for the Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts and The Ritz-Carlton brands.
(4)Select-Service and Extended-Stay composite statistics include properties for the Courtyard, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, Fairfield Inn and SpringHill Suites brands.
(5)Composite – All statistics include properties for the Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, The Ritz-Carlton, Courtyard, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, Fairfield Inn and SpringHill Suites brands.

Occupancy, average daily rate, and REVPAR by region/brand for international properties are shown in the following table.

   Comparable Company-Operated
International Properties(1), (2)


  Comparable Systemwide
International Properties (1), (2)


 
   Year Ended
December 31, 2003


  Change vs. 2002

  Year Ended
December 31, 2003


  Change vs. 2002

 

Caribbean and Latin America

               

Occupancy

   67.5% 4.2%pts.  65.3% 3.8%pts.

Average daily rate

  $126.45  2.7% $121.64  2.2%

REVPAR

  $85.32  9.5% $79.49  8.5%

Continental Europe

               

Occupancy

   67.9% 0.3%pts.  64.9% 0.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $117.79  -5.4% $119.40  -4.0%

REVPAR

  $79.92  -4.9% $77.50  -3.5%

United Kingdom

               

Occupancy

   76.6% -0.7%pts.  72.3% -0.8%pts.

Average daily rate

  $148.14  -1.5% $125.44  -3.2%

REVPAR

  $113.48  -2.4% $90.71  -4.2%

Middle East and Africa

               

Occupancy

   66.5% 0.4%pts.  64.3% 0.6%pts.

Average daily rate

  $71.39  14.9% $71.58  14.6%

REVPAR

  $47.49  15.7% $46.00  15.8%

Asia Pacific(3)

               

Occupancy

   65.5% -6.7%pts.  67.8% -5.3%pts.

Average daily rate

  $85.25  -1.4% $93.13  0.5%

REVPAR

  $55.86  -10.5% $63.10  -6.8%

The Ritz-Carlton International

               

Occupancy

   60.8% -5.9%pts.  60.8% -5.9%pts.

Average daily rate

  $188.91  -0.2% $188.91  -0.2%

REVPAR

  $114.88  -9.0% $114.88  -9.0%

Total Composite International(4)

               

Occupancy

   66.9% -1.8%pts.  67.0% -1.4%pts.

Average daily rate

  $117.27  -0.4% $117.54  -0.3%

REVPAR

  $78.46  -3.0% $78.73  -2.4%

Total Worldwide(5)

               

Occupancy

   68.4% -0.7%pts.  68.1% -0.4%pts.

Average daily rate

  $122.62  -1.1% $108.03  -1.0%

REVPAR

  $83.93  -2.2% $73.52  -1.5%

(1)International financial results are reported on a period-end basis, while international statistics are reported on a month-end basis.
(2)The comparison to 2002 is on a currency-neutral basis and includes results for January through December.
(3)Excludes Hawaii.
(4)Includes Hawaii.
(5)Includes international statistics for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and North American statistics for the fifty-two and fifty-three weeks ended January 2, 2004 and January 3, 2003, respectively.

Full-Service Lodging

($ in millions)

 

           Annual Change

 
  2004

  2003

  2002

  2004/2003

  2003/2002

 

Revenues

  $6,611  $5,876  $5,508  13% 7%
   

  

  

       

Segment results

  $426  $407  $397  5% 3%
   

  

  

       

2004 Compared to 2003

Full-Service Lodging includes ourMarriott Hotels & Resorts,The Ritz-Carlton,Renaissance Hotels & Resorts,Ramada International andBulgari Hotels & Resorts brands. The 2004 segment results reflect an $85 million increase in base management, incentive management and franchise fees, partially offset by $46 million of increased administrative costs, including costs related to unit growth and development, and the receipt in 2003 of $36 million of insurance proceeds. The increase in fees is largely due to stronger REVPAR, driven by occupancy and rate increases, and the growth in the number of rooms. Since year-end 2003, across our Full-Service Lodging segment, we have added 33 hotels (10,212 rooms), and deflagged six hotels (2,860 rooms) excluding Ramada International. As a result of the sale of our Ramada International Hotels & Resorts franchised brand, 210 properties (28,081 rooms) exited our system in 2004. The ongoing impact of this sale is not expected to be material to the Company.

Gains were up $7 million, primarily due to the exercise by Cendant of its option to redeem our interest in the Two Flags joint venture, which generated a gain of $13 million and a note receivable, which was repaid, generating a gain of $5 million. Joint venture results were up $2 million compared to the prior year. For 2003, our equity earnings included $24 million, attributable to our interest in the Two Flags joint venture, while our equity in earnings for 2004 reflects only a $6 million impact due to the redemption of our interest. The improved business environment contributed to the improvement in joint venture results for 2004, offsetting the decline attributable to the Two Flags joint venture.

REVPAR for Full-Service Lodging comparable company-operated North American hotels increased 8.4 percent to $109.62. Occupancy for these hotels increased to 71.3 percent, while average daily rates increased 3.6 percent to $153.66.

Demand associated with our international operations was strong across most regions, generating a 16.6 percent REVPAR increase for comparable company-operated hotels including The Ritz-Carlton. Occupancy increased 6.6 percentage points, while average daily rates increased to $129.35. Financial results increased 37 percent to $140 million, due to stronger demand, particularly in China, Hong Kong, Brazil and Egypt. The European markets generally remain challenging as the economies have been slow to rebound.

2003 Compared to 2002

The 3 percent increase in the Full-Service segment results includes the $36 million insurance payment received for lost management fees in connection with the loss of the New York Marriott World Trade Center hotel in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The 2003 results also reflect an $18 million increase in base management and franchise fees, largely due to the growth in the number of rooms. Across our Full-Service Lodging segment, we added 88 hotels (18,442 rooms) and deflagged 15 hotels (3,152 rooms). We typically earn incentive fees only after a managed hotel achieves a minimum level of owner profitability. As a result, lower revenue and lower property-level margins have reduced the number of hotels from which we earn incentive management fees. As a result, full-service incentive fees declined $41 million in 2003.

REVPAR for Full-Service Lodging North American systemwide hotels declined 1.6 percent to $90.57. Occupancy for these hotels was flat at 67.1 percent, while average daily rates declined 1.6 percent to $134.92.

Financial results for our international operations increased 9 percent to $102 million, reflecting $21 million of gains associated with the sale of our interests in three joint ventures and favorable foreign exchange rates, partially offset by an $8 million charge for guarantee fundings related to a hotel in Istanbul, a $7 million charge to write down our investment in a joint venture that sold a hotel at a loss in January 2004, and the impact of the war and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on international travel earlier in the year. REVPAR for our international systemwide hotels declined 2.4 percent. Occupancy declined 1.4 percentage points, while average daily rates remained relatively flat at $117.54.

Select-Service Lodging

($ in millions)

 

           Annual Change

 
  2004

  2003

  2002

  2004/2003

  2003/2002

 

Revenues

  $1,118  $1,000  $967  12% 3%
   

  

  

       

Segment results

  $140  $99  $130  41% -24%
   

  

  

       

2004 Compared to 2003

Select-Service Lodgingincludes ourCourtyard, Fairfield Inn andSpringHill Suites brands. The increase in revenues overversus the prior year reflects stronger REVPAR, driven by occupancy and rate increases, and the growth in the number of rooms across our select-service brands. Base management, incentive management and franchise fees increased $31 million, and gains were $19 million higher than the prior year, reflecting land sales during the year as well as recognition of deferred gains associated with properties we previously owned. Joint venture results increased by $5 million as a result of the strong business environment. These increases were partially offset by an increase in administrative costs of $13 million. Most of the increase in administrative costs is associated with a transaction related to our Courtyard joint venture (discussed more fully below in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” under the heading “Courtyard Joint Venture”). We expect to enter into a new long-term management agreement with the joint venture in early 2005. As the termination of the existing management agreement is probable, in 2004 we wrote off our deferred contract acquisition costs related to the existing contract, resulting in a charge of $13 million. Across our Select-Service Lodging segment, we have added 89 hotels (10,556 rooms) and deflagged 35 hotels (4,395 rooms) since year-end 2003.

2003 Compared to 2002

The $31 million decrease in the Select-Service Lodging segment results reflects the impact of a $9 million reduction in base management, incentive management and franchise fees. The results also include $14 million of higher equity losses, primarily from our Courtyard joint venture, formed in 2000, which owns 120 Courtyard hotels.

In 2003, across our Select-Service Lodging segment, we added 66 hotels (8,054 rooms) and deflagged four hotels (731 rooms). Over 90 percent of the gross room additions were franchised.

Extended-Stay Lodging

($ in millions)

 

           Annual Change

 
  2004

  2003

  2002

  2004/2003

  2003/2002

 

Revenues

  $547  $557  $600  -2% -7%
   

  

  


      

Segment results

  $66  $47  $(3) 40% nm 
   

  

  


      

2004 Compared to 2003

Extended-Stay Lodging includes ourResidence Inn,TownePlace Suites,Marriott Executive Apartments andMarriott ExecuStay brands. The decline in revenue is primarily attributable to the shift in the ExecuStay business from management to franchising. We entered into more than 20 new franchise markets in 2004, and only five managed markets remain at the end of 2004. Our base management fees increased $4 million, and our incentive management fees were essentially flat with last year, while our franchise fees, principally associated with our Residence Inn brand, increased $9 million. The increase in franchise fees is largely due to the growth in the number of rooms and an increase in REVPAR. Since year-end 2003, we have added 20 hotels (2,303 rooms) and deflagged one hotel (80 rooms) across our Extended-Stay segment. In addition, gains of $10 million in 2004 were favorable to the prior year by $4 million. ExecuStay experienced improved results compared to the prior year, resulting from increased occupancy, primarily in the New York market, coupled with lower operating costs associated with the shift in business towards franchising. The $2 million increase in general and administrative costs associated with supporting the segment’s hotel brands was more than offset by the $6 million decline in ExecuStay’s general and administrative costs associated with the shift toward franchising.

REVPAR for Select-Service and Extended-Stay Lodging comparable company-operated North American hotels increased 9.1 percent to $68.66. Occupancy for these hotels increased to 72.6 percent from 70.0 percent in 2003, while average daily rates increased 4.4 percent to $94.52.

2003 Compared to 2002

        In 2002, we recorded a $50 million charge in our Extended-Stay Lodging segment to write down the acquisition goodwill for ExecuStay. Our base and incentive management fees decreased $7 million and our franchise fees increased $6 million. In 2003, we added 31 hotels (3,837 rooms) across our Extended-Stay Lodging segment. Over 80 percent of the gross room additions were franchised. We deflagged one property (104 rooms)higher fee income ($197 million), and we decreased our ExecuStay brand by 1,300 units.

REVPAR for Select-Service and Extended-Stay Lodging comparable company-operated North American hotels decreased 2.2 percent to $63.64. Occupancy for these hotels decreased to 70.0 percent, while average daily rates decreased 1.1 percent to $90.98.

Timeshare

($ in millions)

 

           Annual Change

 
  2004

  2003

  2002

  2004/2003

  2003/2002

 

Revenues

  $1,502  $1,279  $1,147  17% 12%
   

  

  

       

Segment results

  $203  $149  $183  36% -19%
   

  

  

       

2004 Compared to 2003

Timeshare includes ourMarriott Vacation Club International, The Ritz-Carlton Club, Marriott Grand Residence Club andHorizons by Marriott Vacation Club International brands. Timeshare revenues of $1,502 million and $1,279 million, in 2004 and 2003, respectively, include interval sales, base management fees and cost reimbursements. Including our three joint ventures, contract sales, which represent sales ofhigher timeshare intervals before adjustment for percentage of completion accounting, increased 31 percent, primarily due to strong demand in South Carolina, Florida, Hawaii, California, St. Thomas and Aruba. The favorable segment results reflect a 9 percent increase in timeshare interval sales and services revenue net of direct expenses ($98 million), lower general, administrative, and other expenses ($76 million), a lower loan loss provision ($31 million), higher margins, primarily resulting fromowned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses ($17 million), and lower marketing and selling costs, and the mix of units sold, partially offset by $24 million of higher administrative expenses. Our note sales gain of $64 million was flat compared to the prior year. In addition, we adjusted the discount rate used in determining the fair value of our residual interests due to current trends in interest rates and recorded a $7 million charge in 2004. Reported revenue growth trailed contract sales growth because of a higher proportion of sales in joint venture projects and projects with lower average construction completion.

2003 Compared to 2002

Our Timeshare segment results decreased 19 percent to $149 million, while revenues increased 12 percent. Note sale gains in 2003 were $64 million compared to $60 million in 2002. Contract sales increased 16 percent and were strong at timeshare resorts in the Caribbean, Hawaii, and South Carolina and soft in Lake Tahoe, Orlando and Williamsburg. The comparison to 2002 reflects the $44 million gain in 2002 on the sale of our investment in Interval International. Timeshare revenues of $1,279 million and $1,147 million, in 2003 and 2002, respectively, includes interval sales, base management fees and cost reimbursements.

Synthetic Fuel

For 2004, the synthetic fuel operation generated revenue of $321 million and income from continuing operations of $107 million, comprised of: operating losses of $98 million; and equity losses of $28 million (which included net earn-out payments made of $6 million); entirely offset by net earn-out payments received of $28 million; a $21 million tax benefit; tax credits which amounted to $144 million; and a minority interest benefit of $40 million reflecting our partner’s share of the operating losses.

For 2003, the synthetic fuel operation generated revenue of $302 million and income from continuing operations of $96 million, comprised of: operating losses of $104 million (which included net earn-out payments made of $14 million); minority interest expense of $55 million, reflecting our partner’s share of the tax credits, tax benefits,($2 million). Partially offsetting these favorable variances, were significantly higher taxes ($96 million), lower gains and operating losses; entirely offset byother income ($75 million), lower equity investment results ($33 million), lower interest income of $10 million; a $34 million tax benefit;($30 million), and tax credits which amounted to $211 million.

The $11 million increase in income from continuing operations attributable to the synthetic fuel operation to $107 million from $96 million is primarily due to slightly higher production in 2004.

In July 2004, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) field auditors issued a notice of proposed adjustment and later a Summary Report to PacifiCorp, the previous owner of the synthetic fuel facilities, that included a challenge to the placed-in-service dates of three of the four synthetic fuel facilities owned by one of our synthetic fuel joint ventures. One of the conditions to qualify for tax credits under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code is that the production facility must have been placed-in-service before July 1, 1998.

We strongly believe that all the facilities meet the placed-in-service requirement. Although we are engaged in discussions with the IRS and are confident this issue will be resolved in our favor and not result in a material charge to us, we cannot assure you as to the ultimate outcome of this matter. If ultimately resolved against us we could be prevented from realizing projected future tax credits and cause us to reverse previously utilized tax credits, requiring payment of substantial additional taxes. Since acquiring the plants, we have recognized approximately $435 million of tax credits from all four plants through December 31, 2004. The tax credits recognized through December 31, 2004, associated with the three facilities in question totaled approximately $330 million.

On October 6, 2004, we entered into amendment agreements with our synthetic fuel partner that result in a shift in the allocation of tax credits between us. On the synthetic fuel facility that is not being reviewed by the IRS, our partner increased its allocation of tax credits from approximately 50 percent to 90 percent through March 31, 2005, and pays a higher price per tax credit to us for that additional share of tax credits. With respect to the three synthetic fuel facilities under IRS review, our partner reduced its allocation of tax credits from approximately 50 percent to an average of roughly 5 percent through March 31, 2005. If the IRS’ placed-in-service challenge regarding the three facilities is not successfully resolved by March 31, 2005, our partner will have the right to return its ownership interest in those three facilities to us at that time. We will have the flexibility to continue to operate at current levels, reduce production and/or sell an interest to another party. If there is a successful resolution by March 31, 2005, our partner’s share of the tax credits from all four facilities will return to approximately 50 percent. In any event, on March 31, 2005, our share of the tax credits from the one facility not under review will return to approximately 50 percent.

expense ($18 million).

ImpactCumulative Effect of Future Adoption ofChange in Accounting StandardsPrinciple

2006

Statement of Position 04-2, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-sharingTime-Sharing Transactions”

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 152, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67,” and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 04-2, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-sharing Transactions,” andSOP 04-2. Additionally, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB amended Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”)FAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” and FAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” to exclude accounting for real estate time-sharing transactions from these statements. We adopted SOP 04-2 at the beginning of the 2006 first quarter.

Under SOP 04-2, we charge the majority of sales and marketing costs we incur to sell timeshares to expense when incurred. We also record an estimate of expected uncollectibility on notes receivable that we receive from timeshare purchasers as a reduction in revenue at the time that we recognize profit on a timeshare sale. We also account for rental and other operations during holding periods as incidental operations, which requires us to record any excess of revenues over costs as a reduction of inventory costs.

The adoption of SOP 04-2 in 2006, which we reported as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in our Consolidated Statements of Income, resulted in a non-cash after-tax charge of $109 million ($0.25 per diluted share). The pretax charge totaled $173 million and comprised a $130 million inventory write-down, the establishment of a $25 million notes receivable reserve and an increase in current liabilities of $18 million.

We estimate that, for the 20-year period from 2008 through 2027, the cost of completing improvements and currently planned amenities for our owned timeshare properties will be approximately $1.7 billion.

Business Segments

We are a diversified hospitality company with operations in five business segments:

North American Full-Service Lodging, which includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Marriott Conference Centers, JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Renaissance ClubSport properties located in the continental United States and Canada;

North American Limited-Service Lodging, which includes Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, SpringHill Suites, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, and Marriott ExecuStay properties located in the continental United States and Canada;

International Lodging, which includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, Residence Inn, Ramada International, and Marriott Executive Apartments properties located outside the continental United States and Canada;

Luxury Lodging, which includes The Ritz-Carlton and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts properties worldwide; and

Timeshare, which includes the development, marketing, operation, and sale of timeshare, fractional ownership, and residential properties worldwide under Marriott Vacation Club, The Ritz-Carlton Club, Grand Residences by Marriott, and Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club.

In addition to the segments above, in 2007 we exited the synthetic fuel business, which was formerly a separate segment but which we now report under discontinued operations.

In addition to the brands noted above, in 2007 we announced our new brand of family-friendly resorts and spas, “Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott” and a new brand of lifestyle boutique hotels, “Edition.” At year-end 2007, no properties were yet open under either brand.

In 2006, we analyzed our internal reporting process and implemented changes in the fourth quarter that were designed to improve efficiency and, as part of this process, we evaluated the impact on segment reporting. Accordingly, we now report five operating segments, and no longer allocate indirect administrative expenses to our segments. We reflect this revised segment reporting throughout this report for all periods presented, and present historical figures in a manner that is consistent with the revised segment reporting. See also the Form 8-K that we filed on March 19, 2007, furnishing quarterly Revenues and Income from Continuing Operations for each of 2006 and 2005 in the new segment format.

We evaluate the performance of our segments based primarily on the results of the segment without allocating corporate expenses, interest expense, indirect general, administrative, and other expenses, or income taxes. With the exception of the Timeshare segment, we do not allocate interest income to our segments. Because note sales are an integral part of the Timeshare segment, we include note sale gains in our Timeshare segment results. We include interest income associated with Timeshare segment notes in our Timeshare segment results because financing sales are an integral part of that segment’s operations. We also allocate other gains or losses as well as equity in earnings or losses from our joint ventures and divisional general, administrative, and other expenses to each of our segments. “Other unallocated corporate” represents that portion of our revenues, general, administrative, and other expenses, equity in earnings or losses, and other gains or losses that are not allocable to our segments.

We aggregate the brands presented within our North American Full-Service, North American Limited-Service, International, Luxury, and Timeshare segments considering their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, distribution channels, the regulatory business environment of the brands and operations within each segment, and our organizational and management reporting structure.

Total Lodging Products by Segment

At year-end 2007, we operated or franchised the following properties by segment (excluding 2,156 corporate housing rental units):

   Total Lodging Products
   Properties  Rooms
   U.S.  Non-U.S.  Total  U.S.  Non-U.S.  Total

North American Full-Service Lodging Segment(1)

            

Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  309  12  321  121,842  4,556  126,398

Marriott Conference Centers

  13  —    13  3,476  —    3,476

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  15  —    15  7,901  —    7,901

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

  70  3  73  25,942  1,034  26,976

Renaissance ClubSport

  1  —    1  175  —    175
                  
  408  15  423  159,336  5,590  164,926

North American Limited-Service Lodging Segment(1)

            

Courtyard

  693  16  709  96,759  2,847  99,606

Fairfield Inn

  529  7  536  46,930  741  47,671

SpringHill Suites

  176  1  177  20,445  124  20,569

Residence Inn

  528  17  545  62,805  2,536  65,341

TownePlace Suites

  141  —    141  14,122  —    14,122
                  
  2,067  41  2,108  241,061  6,248  247,309

International Lodging Segment(1)

            

Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  4  144  148  2,742  39,396  42,138

JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts

  1  22  23  387  8,244  8,631

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

  —    67  67  —    21,783  21,783

Courtyard

  —    58  58  —    11,174  11,174

Fairfield Inn

  —    1  1  —    206  206

Residence Inn

  —    1  1  —    75  75

Marriott Executive Apartments

  —    18  18  —    2,905  2,905

Ramada International

  —    2  2  —    332  332
                  
  5  313  318  3,129  84,115  87,244

Luxury Lodging Segment

            

The Ritz-Carlton

  36  34  70  11,627  9,978  21,605

Bulgari Hotels & Resorts

  —    2  2  —    117  117

The Ritz-Carlton-Residential(2)

  16  1  17  1,614  93  1,707
                  
  52  37  89  13,241  10,188  23,429

Timeshare Lodging Segment(3)

            

Marriott Vacation Club

  37  9  46  8,987  1,909  10,896

The Ritz-Carlton Club-Fractional

  5  2  7  283  105  388

The Ritz-Carlton Club-Residential(2)

  2  1  3  138  6  144

Grand Residences by Marriott-Fractional

  1  1  2  199  49  248

Grand Residences by Marriott-Residential(1), (2)

  1  —    1  65  —    65

Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club

  2  —    2  444  —    444
                  
  48  13  61  10,116  2,069  12,185
                  

Total

  2,580  419  2,999  426,883  108,210  535,093
                  

(1)

North American includes properties located in the continental United States and Canada. International includes properties located outside the continental United States and Canada.

(2)

Represents projects where we manage the related owners’ association. Residential products are included once they possess a certificate of occupancy.

(3)

Includes resorts that are in active sales as well as those that are sold out. Products in active sales may not be ready for occupancy.

Revenues

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $5,476  $5,196  $5,116 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   2,198   2,060   1,886 

International Segment

   1,594   1,411   1,017 

Luxury Segment

   1,576   1,423   1,333 

Timeshare Segment

   2,065   1,840   1,721 
             

Total segment revenues

   12,909   11,930   11,073 

Other unallocated corporate

   81   65   56 
             
  $12,990  $11,995  $11,129 
             

 

Income from Continuing Operations

 

    
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $478  $455  $349 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   461   380   303 

International Segment

   271   237   133 

Luxury Segment

   72   63   45 

Timeshare Segment

   306   280   271 
             

Total segment financial results

   1,588   1,415   1,101 

Other unallocated corporate

   (287)  (251)  (219)

Interest income, provision for loan losses and interest
expense

   (163)  (72)  (55)

Income taxes

   (441)  (380)  (284)
             
  $697  $712  $543 
             

 

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Equity Method Investees

 

    
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $3  $2  $21 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   2   —     (6)

International Segment

   3   —     20 

Luxury Segment

   (4)  (2)  (1)

Timeshare Segment

   10   (2)  1 
             

Total segment equity in earnings (losses)

   14   (2)  35 

Other unallocated corporate

   1   5   1 
             
  $15  $3  $36 
             

Our business includes our North American Full-Service, North American Limited-Service, International, Luxury, and Timeshare segments. We consider total segment revenues and total segment financial results to be meaningful indicators of our performance because they measure our growth in profitability and enable investors to compare the revenues and results of our operations to those of other lodging companies.

We consider RevPAR to be a meaningful indicator of our performance because it measures the period-over-period change in room revenues for comparable properties. We calculate RevPAR by dividing room sales for comparable properties by room nights available to guests for the period. RevPAR may not be comparable to similarly titled measures, such as revenues.

Company-operated house profit margin is the ratio of property-level gross operating profit (also known as house profit) to total property-level revenue. This ratio measures our overall ability as the operator to produce property-level profits by generating sales and controlling the operating expenses over which we have the most direct control. Gross operating profit includes room, food and beverage, and other revenue and the related expenses including payroll and benefits expenses, as well as repairs and maintenance, utility, general and administrative, and sales and marketing expenses. Gross operating profit does not include the impact of management fees, furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement reserves, insurance, taxes, or other fixed expenses.

2007 Compared to 2006

We added 203 properties (29,200 rooms) and 55 properties (9,722 rooms) exited the system in 2007, not including residential products. We also added three residential properties (347 units).

Total segment financial results increased by $173 million (12 percent) to $1,588 million in 2007 from $1,415 million in 2006, and total segment revenues increased by $979 million to $12,909 million in 2007, an 8 percent increase from revenues of $11,930 million in 2006. The results, as compared to the prior year, reflect a $204 million (17 percent) increase in combined base management, franchise, and incentive management fees from $1,224 million in 2006 to $1,428 million in 2007, a $16 million increase in earnings associated with equity investments, and a $1 million minority interest benefit. Partially offsetting these favorable variances was a decrease of $18 million in owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses, $13 million of increased general, administrative, and other expenses, a decrease of $10 million in gains and other income, and a decrease of $7 million in timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses.

Higher RevPAR for comparable rooms, resulting from both domestic and international rate increases, higher property-level food and beverage and other revenue, and new unit growth, drove the increase in base management and franchise fees. In 2006, we recognized $5 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006, versus no similar fees in 2007. Incentive management fees increased by $88 million (31 percent) during 2007, reflecting the impact of strong room rate increases and property-level margin improvements associated with productivity improvements. Incentive management fees included $17 million and $10 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively, that were calculated based on prior periods’ earnings, but not earned and due until the periods in which they were recognized. Furthermore, incentive management fees for 2007 also included $13 million of business interruption insurance proceeds associated with hurricanes in prior years and base management fees included $6 million and $1 million of business interruption insurance proceeds, also associated with hurricanes in prior years, received in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2007, 67 percent of our managed properties paid incentive management fees to us versus 62 percent in 2006.

Systemwide RevPAR, which includes data from our franchised properties, in addition to our owned, leased, and managed properties, for comparable North American properties increased by 6.0 percent over 2006, and RevPAR for our comparable North American company-operated properties increased by 6.2 percent over 2006.

Systemwide RevPAR for comparable international properties increased by 8.4 percent, and RevPAR for comparable international company-operated properties increased by 8.9 percent. Worldwide RevPAR for comparable systemwide properties increased by 6.5 percent (7.6 percent using actual dollars) while worldwide RevPAR for comparable company-operated properties increased by 7.0 percent.

As compared to 2006, 2007 worldwide comparable company-operated house profit margins increased by 150 basis points, while North American company-operated house profit margins improved by 160 basis points versus 2006. For 2007, as compared to 2006, house profit per available room (“HP-PAR”) at our full-service managed properties in North America increased by 10.6 percent. HP-PAR at our North American limited-service managed properties increased by 8.9 percent, and worldwide HP-PAR for all our brands increased by 11.0 percent on a constant dollar basis.

2006 Compared to 2005

We added 136 properties (23,466 rooms) and 45 properties (8,616 rooms) left the system in 2006. Most of the properties that left the system were limited-service properties.

Total segment financial results increased by $314 million (29 percent) to $1,415 million in 2006 from $1,101 million in 2005, and total segment revenues increased by $857 million to $11,930 million in 2006, an 8 percent increase from revenues of $11,073 million in 2005. The results as compared to the prior year reflect a $197 million (19 percent) increase in combined base management, franchise, and incentive management fees from $1,027 million in 2005 to $1,224 million in 2006, $124 million of lower general, administrative, and other expenses, $8 million of increased owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue net of direct expenses, a $98 million increase in timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses, and an increase in minority interest of $2 million, partially offset by $78 million of lower gains and other income and a $37 million decline in earnings associated with equity investments. Higher RevPAR for comparable rooms, resulting from both domestic and international rate increases, higher property-level food and beverage and other revenue, and new unit growth drove the increase in base management and franchise fees. In 2006, we recognized $5 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006. Incentive management fees increased by $80 million (40 percent) during 2006, reflecting the impact of strong room rate improvement and property-level margin improvements. Incentive management fees include $10 million and $14 million for 2006 and 2005,

respectively, that were calculated based on prior periods’ earnings, but not earned and due until the periods in which they were recognized. In 2006, 62 percent of our managed properties paid incentive management fees to us versus 51 percent in 2005.

Systemwide RevPAR for comparable North American properties increased by 9.1 percent over 2005 and RevPAR for our comparable North American company-operated properties increased by 8.9 percent.

Systemwide RevPAR for comparable international properties, increased by 10.5 percent, and RevPAR for comparable international company-operated properties increased by 11.1 percent. Worldwide RevPAR for comparable systemwide properties increased by 9.4 percent while worldwide RevPAR for comparable company-operated properties increased by 9.5 percent.

In addition, worldwide comparable company-operated house profit margins increased by 230 basis points, while North American company-operated house profit margins improved by 240 basis points versus 2005. For 2006, as compared to 2005, HP-PAR at our full-service managed properties in North America increased by 16.3 percent. HP-PAR at our North American limited-service managed properties increased by 12.6 percent, and worldwide HP-PAR for all our brands increased by 15.4 percent on a constant dollar basis.

Lodging Development

We opened 203 properties, totaling 29,200 rooms, across our brands in 2007 and 55 properties (9,722 rooms) left the system, not including residential products. We also added three residential properties (347 units). Highlights of the year included:

Converting 26 properties (5,618 rooms), or 18 percent of our gross room additions for the year, from other brands, and 21 percent of the rooms were located in international markets;

Opening approximately 16 percent of all the new rooms outside the United States;

Adding 156 properties (17,517 rooms) to our North American Limited-Service brands; and

Opening two new Marriott Vacation Club properties in the West Indies on the island of St. Kitts, and the U.S. Virgin Islands on the island of St. Thomas, as well as one new Ritz-Carlton Club and residences property in San Francisco, California.

We currently have more than 125,000 hotel rooms under construction, awaiting conversion, or approved for development in our hotel development pipeline and we expect to add over 30,000 hotel rooms and timeshare units to our system in 2008. We expect to remove approximately 5,000 rooms from our system during the 2008 full year.

We believe that we have access to sufficient financial resources to finance our growth, as well as to support our ongoing operations and meet debt service and other cash requirements. Nonetheless, our ability to sell properties that we develop and the ability of hotel developers to build or acquire new Marriott-branded properties, both of which are important parts of our growth plan, depend in part on capital access, availability and cost for other hotel developers and third-party owners. These growth plans are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. See the “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risks and Uncertainties” captions earlier in this report and the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” caption later in this report.

Statistics. The following tables show occupancy, average daily rate, and RevPAR for comparable properties, for each of the brands in our North American Full-Service and North American Limited-Service segments, for our International segment by region, and the principal brand in our Luxury segment, The Ritz-Carlton. We have not presented statistics for company-operated Fairfield Inn properties in these tables because we operate only a limited number of properties, as the brand is predominantly franchised and such information would not be meaningful (identified as “nm” in the tables that follow). Systemwide statistics include data from our franchised properties, in addition to our owned, leased, and managed properties.

The occupancy, average daily rate, and RevPAR statistics used throughout this report for 2007 include the period from December 30, 2006, through December 28, 2007, the statistics for 2006 include the period from December 31, 2005, through December 29, 2006, and the statistics for 2005 include the period from January 1, 2005, through December 30, 2005 (except in each case, for The Ritz-Carlton brand properties and properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada, which for them includes the period from January 1 through December 31 for each year).

   Comparable Company-Operated
North American Properties (1)
  Comparable Systemwide
North American Properties (1)
   2007  Change vs. 2006  2007  Change vs. 2006

Marriott Hotels & Resorts(2)

        

Occupancy

   72.6% 1.0% pts.   70.8% 0.6% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $175.41  5.4%   $160.61  5.5% 

RevPAR

  $127.43  6.9%   $113.66  6.4% 

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

        

Occupancy

   73.1% 0.4% pts.   71.8% -0.4% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $169.93  5.4%   $157.29  5.8% 

RevPAR

  $124.17  5.9%   $112.96  5.1% 

Composite North American Full-Service(3)

        

Occupancy

   72.7% 0.9% pts.��  70.9% 0.5% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $174.54  5.4%   $160.10  5.5% 

RevPAR

  $126.92  6.8%   $113.56  6.2% 

The Ritz-Carlton North America

        

Occupancy

   72.3% 0.1% pts.   72.3% 0.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $331.48  7.3%   $331.48  7.3% 

RevPAR

  $239.67  7.5%   $239.67  7.5% 

Composite North American Full-Service and Luxury(4)

        

Occupancy

   72.7% 0.8% pts.   71.0% 0.4% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $189.41  5.7%   $169.92  5.7% 

RevPAR

  $137.66  6.9%   $120.65  6.4% 

Residence Inn

        

Occupancy

   77.7% -0.5% pts.   78.2% -0.8% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $124.24  4.6%   $122.44  6.1% 

RevPAR

  $96.53  3.9%   $95.80  5.1% 

Courtyard

        

Occupancy

   70.4% -0.4% pts.   72.1% -0.2% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $127.34  5.6%   $124.12  5.9% 

RevPAR

  $89.69  4.9%   $89.53  5.6% 

Fairfield Inn

        

Occupancy

   nm  nm     70.5% -0.3% pts.

Average Daily Rate

   nm  nm    $88.19  7.2% 

RevPAR

   nm  nm    $62.17  6.7% 

TownePlace Suites

        

Occupancy

   74.2% -1.1% pts.   73.5% -2.4% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $85.65  8.9%   $86.93  8.4% 

RevPAR

  $63.56  7.2%   $63.89  5.0% 

SpringHill Suites

        

Occupancy

   72.6% 0.6% pts.   73.2% -0.6% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $107.86  4.2%   $106.49  6.5% 

RevPAR

  $78.27  5.0%   $77.97  5.7% 

Composite North American Limited-Service (5)

        

Occupancy

   72.7% -0.4% pts.   73.6% -0.5% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $122.63  5.4%   $113.34  6.3% 

RevPAR

  $89.18  4.8%   $83.37  5.6% 

Composite North American (6)

        

Occupancy

   72.7% 0.3% pts.   72.6% -0.2% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $159.01  5.8%   $134.62  6.2% 

RevPAR

  $115.60  6.2%   $97.70  6.0% 

(1)

Statistics are for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2007, and December 29, 2006, except for Ritz-Carlton for which the statistics are for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006. For properties located in Canada the comparison to 2006 is on a constant U.S. dollar basis.

(2)

Marriott Hotels & Resorts includes JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts.

(3)

Composite North American Full-Service statistics include properties located in the continental United States and Canada for Marriott Hotels & Resorts and Renaissance Hotels & Resorts.

(4)

Composite North American Full-Service and Luxury includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Ritz-Carlton.

(5)

Composite North American Limited-Service statistics include properties located in the continental United States and Canada for Residence Inn, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, TownePlace Suites, and SpringHill Suites.

(6)

Composite North American statistics include properties located in the continental United States and Canada for Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Residence Inn, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, TownePlace Suites, SpringHill Suites, and The Ritz-Carlton.

   Comparable Company-Operated
Properties (1)
  Comparable Systemwide
Properties (1)
   2007  Change vs. 2006  2007  Change vs. 2006

Caribbean and Latin America(2)

        

Occupancy

   76.5% 2.4% pts.   74.8% 2.8% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $167.56  9.2%   $156.76  7.5% 

RevPAR

  $128.25  12.7%   $117.20  11.7% 

Continental Europe(2)

        

Occupancy

   74.4% 1.3% pts.   72.0% 1.2% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $173.92  5.8%   $174.93  5.4% 

RevPAR

  $129.34  7.7%   $126.01  7.3% 

United Kingdom(2)

        

Occupancy

   77.8% 0.1% pts.   77.4% 0.3% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $203.27  5.2%   $200.65  4.7% 

RevPAR

  $158.08  5.2%   $155.27  5.1% 

Middle East and Africa(2)

        

Occupancy

   73.3% 4.8% pts.   72.4% 4.9% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $135.74  9.1%   $133.98  9.0% 

RevPAR

  $99.57  16.8%   $96.95  17.0% 

Asia Pacific(2), (3)

        

Occupancy

   75.2% -0.8% pts.   75.3% -0.5% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $147.79  8.9%   $148.67  7.7% 

RevPAR

  $111.15  7.8%   $111.92  7.0% 

Regional Composite (4), (5)

        

Occupancy

   75.7% 0.8% pts.   74.6% 1.0% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $168.30  7.0%   $166.03  6.3% 

RevPAR

  $127.44  8.2%   $123.78  7.8% 

International Luxury(6)

        

Occupancy

   72.7% 4.0% pts.   72.7% 4.0% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $292.24  6.1%   $292.24  6.1% 

RevPAR

  $212.54  12.2%   $212.54  12.2% 

Total International(7)

        

Occupancy

   75.4% 1.2% pts.   74.4% 1.3% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $180.73  7.2%   $176.57  6.6% 

RevPAR

  $136.29  8.9%   $131.36  8.4% 

(1)

Financial results for all properties are reported on a period-end basis, while statistics for properties located outside the continental United States and Canada are reported on a month-end basis. The statistics are for January through December. For the properties located in countries that use currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the comparison to 2006 is on a constant U.S. dollar basis.

(2)

Regional information includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Courtyard properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada.

(3)

Excludes Hawaii.

(4)

Includes Hawaii.

(5)

Regional Composite statistics include all properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada for Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Courtyard.

(6)

Includes The Ritz-Carlton properties located outside of North America and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.

(7)

Total International includes Regional Composite statistics and statistics for The Ritz-Carlton International and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.

   Comparable Company-Operated
Properties (1)
  Comparable Systemwide
Properties (1)
   2007  Change vs. 2006  2007  Change vs. 2006

Composite Luxury (2)

        

Occupancy

   72.5% 1.8% pts.   72.5% 1.8% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $314.36  6.6%   $314.36  6.6% 

RevPAR

  $227.87  9.4%   $227.87  9.4% 

Total Worldwide(3)

        

Occupancy

   73.5% 0.5% pts.   72.9% 0.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $165.19  6.2%   $141.60  6.4% 

RevPAR

  $121.34  7.0%   $103.19  6.5% 

(1)

Financial results for all properties are reported on a period-end basis, while statistics for properties located outside the continental United States and Canada are reported on a month-end basis. For the properties located in countries that use currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the comparison to 2006 is on a constant U.S. dollar basis.

(2)

Composite Luxury includes worldwide properties for The Ritz-Carlton and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.

(3)

Total Worldwide statistics include all properties worldwide for Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Residence Inn, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, TownePlace Suites, SpringHill Suites, and The Ritz-Carlton. Statistics for properties located in the continental United States and Canada (except for The Ritz-Carlton) represent the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2007, and December 29, 2006. Statistics for all The Ritz-Carlton properties and properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada represent the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006.

   Comparable Company-Operated
North American Properties (1)
  Comparable Systemwide
North American Properties (1)
   2006  Change vs. 2005  2006  Change vs. 2005

Marriott Hotels & Resorts(2)

        

Occupancy

   72.3% -0.6% pts.   70.9% 0.2% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $168.11  9.1%   $154.37  8.3% 

RevPAR

  $121.58  8.3%   $109.48  8.6% 

Renaissance Hotels & Resorts

        

Occupancy

   72.8% 0.6% pts.   72.2% 1.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $162.96  8.7%   $151.91  8.4% 

RevPAR

  $118.57  9.6%   $109.75  10.0% 

Composite North American Full-Service(3)

        

Occupancy

   72.4% -0.4% pts.   71.1% 0.3% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $167.27  9.0%   $153.99  8.3% 

RevPAR

  $121.10  8.5%   $109.52  8.9% 

The Ritz-Carlton North America

        

Occupancy

   72.9% 2.1% pts.   72.9% 2.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $307.20  7.1%   $307.20  7.1% 

RevPAR

  $223.88  10.3%   $223.88  10.3% 

Composite North American Full-Service and Luxury(4)

        

Occupancy

   72.4% -0.1% pts.   71.2% 0.5% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $180.17  8.9%   $163.03  8.3% 

RevPAR

  $130.52  8.7%   $116.11  9.0% 

Residence Inn

        

Occupancy

   78.3% -1.8% pts.   79.2% -0.5% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $117.99  9.2%   $113.85  8.2% 

RevPAR

  $92.35  6.8%   $90.15  7.6% 

Courtyard

        

Occupancy

   70.9% -0.4% pts.   72.5% 0.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $119.30  10.9%   $116.67  9.5% 

RevPAR

  $84.62  10.3%   $84.57  9.7% 

Fairfield Inn

        

Occupancy

   nm  nm     70.7% 1.0% pts.

Average Daily Rate

   nm  nm    $82.05  9.1% 

RevPAR

   nm  nm    $58.01  10.6% 

TownePlace Suites

        

Occupancy

   75.3% -0.3% pts.   75.7% -0.2% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $78.68  10.9%   $79.69  10.2% 

RevPAR

  $59.28  10.4%   $60.35  9.9% 

SpringHill Suites

        

Occupancy

   72.3% -2.0% pts.   74.1% 0.2% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $102.86  10.7%   $98.76  9.8% 

RevPAR

  $74.42  7.8%   $73.16  10.0% 

Composite North American Limited-Service (5)

        

Occupancy

   73.3% -0.8% pts.   74.2% 0.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $115.24  10.4%   $105.65  9.0% 

RevPAR

  $84.41  9.1%   $78.34  9.2% 

Composite North American (6)

        

Occupancy

   72.8% -0.4% pts.   73.0% 0.3% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $152.14  9.5%   $128.07  8.7% 

RevPAR

  $110.74  8.9%   $93.47  9.1% 

(1)

Statistics are for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, except for Ritz-Carlton for which the statistics are for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005. For properties located in Canada the comparison to 2005 is on a constant U.S. dollar basis.

(2)

Marriott Hotels & Resorts includes JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts.

(3)

Composite North American Full-Service statistics include properties located in the continental United States and Canada for Marriott Hotels & Resorts and Renaissance Hotels & Resorts.

(4)

Composite North American Full-Service and Luxury includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Ritz-Carlton.

(5)

Composite North American Limited-Service statistics include properties located in the continental United States and Canada for Residence Inn, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, TownePlace Suites, and SpringHill Suites.

(6)

Composite North American statistics include properties located in the continental United States and Canada for Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Residence Inn, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, TownePlace Suites, SpringHill Suites, and The Ritz-Carlton.

   Comparable Company-Operated
Properties(1)
  Comparable Systemwide
Properties (1)
   2006  Change vs. 2005  2006  Change vs. 2005

Caribbean and Latin America(2)

        

Occupancy

   74.9% 1.5% pts.   73.0% 0.5% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $159.93  9.7%   $150.93  9.2% 

RevPAR

  $119.81  12.0%   $110.11  9.9% 

Continental Europe(2)

        

Occupancy

   72.6% 2.0% pts.   70.7% 1.9% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $147.28  6.6%   $150.58  7.2% 

RevPAR

  $106.95  9.6%   $106.53  10.2% 

United Kingdom(2)

        

Occupancy

   79.6% 3.5% pts.   75.1% 3.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $225.38  9.5%   $204.99  8.6% 

RevPAR

  $179.44  14.6%   $153.94  13.3% 

Middle East and Africa(2)

        

Occupancy

   68.9% -0.3% pts.   69.0% -0.7% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $143.12  11.0%   $134.95  11.5% 

RevPAR

  $98.58  10.5%   $93.05  10.3% 

Asia Pacific(2), (3)

        

Occupancy

   75.8% 1.0% pts.   76.2% 0.9% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $127.09  11.3%   $129.26  9.8% 

RevPAR

  $96.28  12.7%   $98.46  11.2% 

Regional Composite (4), (5)

        

Occupancy

   74.6% 1.3% pts.   73.6% 1.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $148.13  9.5%   $147.12  9.0% 

RevPAR

  $110.53  11.4%   $108.32  10.7% 

International Luxury(6)

        

Occupancy

   71.7% -0.1% pts.   71.7% -0.1% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $241.90  9.2%   $241.90  9.2% 

RevPAR

  $173.35  9.1%   $173.55  9.1% 

Total International(7)

        

Occupancy

   74.4% 1.2% pts.   73.5% 1.0% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $153.99  9.4%   $152.02  9.0% 

RevPAR

  $114.61  11.1%   $111.78  10.5% 

(1)

Financial results for all properties are reported on a period-end basis, while statistics for properties located outside the continental United States and Canada are reported on a month-end basis. The statistics are for January through December. For the properties located in countries that use currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the comparison to 2005 is on a constant U.S. dollar basis.

(2)

Regional information includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Courtyard properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada.

(3)

Excludes Hawaii.

(4)

Includes Hawaii.

(5)

Regional Composite statistics include all properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada for Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Courtyard.

(6)

Includes The Ritz-Carlton properties located outside of North America and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.

(7)

Total International includes Regional Composite statistics and statistics for The Ritz-Carlton International and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.

   Comparable Company-Operated
Properties (1)
  Comparable Systemwide
Properties (1)
   2006  Change vs. 2005  2006  Change vs. 2005

Composite Luxury (2)

        

Occupancy

   72.5% 1.4% pts.   72.5% 1.4% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $289.50  7.5%   $289.50  7.5% 

RevPAR

  $209.88  9.7%   $209.88  9.7% 

Total Worldwide(3)

        

Occupancy

   73.2% 0.0% pts.   73.1% 0.4% pts.

Average Daily Rate

  $152.63  9.5%   $131.92  8.8% 

RevPAR

  $111.75  9.5%   $96.39  9.4% 

(1)

Financial results for all properties are reported on a period-end basis, while statistics for properties located outside the continental United States and Canada are reported on a month-end basis. For the properties located in countries that use currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the comparison to 2005 is on a constant U.S. dollar basis.

(2)

Composite Luxury includes worldwide properties for The Ritz-Carlton and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts.

(3)

Total Worldwide statistics include all properties worldwide for Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Residence Inn, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, TownePlace Suites, SpringHill Suites, and The Ritz-Carlton. Statistics for properties located in the continental United States and Canada (except for The Ritz-Carlton) represent the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005. Statistics for all The Ritz-Carlton properties and properties located outside of the continental United States and Canada represent the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005.

North American Full-Service Lodging includesMarriott Hotels & Resorts, Marriott Conference Centers,JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts,Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, andRenaissance ClubSport.

            Annual Change 
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005  2007/2006  2006/2005 

Segment revenues

  $5,476  $5,196  $5,116  5% 2%
               

Segment results

  $478  $455  $349  5% 30%
               

2007 Compared to 2006

In 2007, across our North American Full-Service Lodging segment, we added 13 properties (3,947 rooms) and six properties (2,853 rooms) left the system.

In 2007, RevPAR for comparable company-operated North American full-service properties increased by 6.8 percent to $126.92. Occupancy for these properties increased by 0.9 percentage points to 72.7 percent, and average daily rates increased by 5.4 percent to $174.54.

The $23 million increase in segment results compared to 2006 reflects a $65 million increase in base management, incentive management, and franchise fees, partially offset by a $22 million decline in gains and other income and a $20 million decrease in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses.

The $65 million increase in fees was largely due to stronger RevPAR and property-level margins, driven primarily by rate increases and productivity improvements. Incentive management fees for 2007 reflect the receipt of $12 million and base management fees for 2007 reflect the receipt of $2 million, both of which were for business interruption insurance proceeds associated with Hurricane Katrina, and no similar fees in 2006. Additionally, 2006 reflected the recognition of $3 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006, compared to the recognition of no similar fees in 2007.

Gains and other income was $22 million lower in 2007, as compared to 2006, and reflected a $37 million charge in 2006 associated with a straight-line rent receivable, partially offset by the redemption of preferred stock in a cost method investee that generated income of $25 million in 2006 and $34 million of lower other gains in 2007, as compared to 2006. The $34 million decrease in other gains compared to the prior year reflects gains in 2006 associated with the sale of joint venture investments and real estate, while 2007 reflects limited similar activity. Owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses decreased by $20 million and reflected properties sold and $10 million of hotel management and franchise agreement termination fees received in 2006, compared to $3 million of such fees received in 2007. General, administrative, and other expenses for 2007 were unchanged as compared to 2006 primarily reflecting $5 million of hotel management agreement performance cure payments in 2006 offset by a guarantee charge in 2007 associated with one property and the write-off of a deferred contract acquisition cost associated with another property that left the system.

2006 Compared to 2005

In 2006, across our North American Full-Service Lodging segment, we added 15 properties (4,971 rooms) and six properties (1,604 rooms) left the system.

In 2006, RevPAR for comparable company-operated North American full-service properties increased by 8.5 percent to $121.10. Occupancy for these properties decreased by 0.4 percentage points, and average daily rates increased by 9.0 percent to $167.27.

Compared to the prior year, our 2006 results reflect a $59 million increase in base management, incentive management, and franchise fees. The increase in fees is largely due to stronger RevPAR, driven primarily by rate increases and, to a lesser extent, higher food and beverage, meeting room rental and other revenue, and productivity improvements, all of which favorably impacted property-level house profit margins. The growth in the number of rooms, year-over-year, also contributed to the increase in fees. Incentive management fees included $10 million for 2005 that were calculated based on prior periods’ earnings but not earned and due until they were recognized. Similarly, base management fees for 2006 included $4 million of fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006. Owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses decreased by $8 million primarily as a result of properties sold in 2006 and the receipt in 2005 of a $10 million hotel agreement termination fee associated with one property, partially offset by the receipt in 2006 of $10 million of hotel management and franchise agreement termination fees.

General, administrative, and other expenses decreased by $69 million as a result of, among other things, a $60 million charge in 2005 associated with the CTF transaction, more fully discussed in the previous “Operating Income” discussion, as well as expenses of $14 million in 2005 related to our bedding incentive program, partially offset by increased expenses in 2006 reflecting costs related to unit growth and development, systems improvements, and increases in ordinary costs such as wages and benefits. In 2005, general, administrative, and other expenses included $3 million of hotel management agreement performance cure payments associated with one property. In 2006, general, administrative, and other expenses included a $5 million hotel management agreement performance cure payment.

Gains and other income was $3 million higher than the prior year and reflected the redemption of preferred stock in a cost method investee that generated income of $25 million in 2006 and $15 million of higher net gains and other income in 2006 reflecting gains in 2006 associated with the sale of joint venture investments and real estate that were partially offset by lower gains in 2006 associated with the sale or repayment before maturity of loans receivable associated with several properties. Gains and other income for 2006 reflected a $37 million non-cash charge to adjust the carrying amount to net realizable value associated with land we own and lease, as further described in the “Expected Land Sale” caption in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our 2006 Form 10-K. Equity results decreased by $19 million versus the prior year and reflected the recognition in 2005 of $16 million in equity earnings from two joint ventures as a result of the ventures’ sale of hotels and our sale of some joint venture investments in 2005 and 2006, offset to some extent by improved equity joint venture results reflecting the stronger demand environment.

North American Limited-Service LodgingincludesCourtyard, Fairfield Inn, SpringHill Suites, Residence Inn,TownePlace Suites, and Marriott ExecuStay.

            Annual Change 
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005  2007/2006  2006/2005 

Segment revenues

  $2,198  $2,060  $1,886  7% 9%
               

Segment results

  $461  $380  $303  21% 25%
               

2007 Compared to 2006

Across our North American Limited-Service Lodging segment, we added 156 properties (17,517 rooms) and 16 properties (1,853 rooms) left the system in 2007. The properties that left the system were primarily associated with our Fairfield Inn brand.

In 2007, RevPAR for comparable company-operated North American limited-service properties increased by 4.8 percent to $89.18. Occupancy for these properties decreased by 0.4 percentage points to 72.7 percent, and average daily rates increased by 5.4 percent to $122.63.

The $81 million increase in segment results, as compared to 2006, primarily reflects an $83 million increase in base management, incentive management, and franchise fees, a $5 million increase in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses, a $2 million increase in gains and other income, and a $2 million increase in joint venture equity earnings, partially offset by $11 million of higher general, administrative, and other expenses.

In 2007, we recognized $15 million of incentive management fees that were calculated based on prior years’ results but not earned and due until 2007 as compared to the recognition of no similar fees in 2006. The additional increase in fees is largely due to higher RevPAR, driven by rate increases, which increased base management and franchise fees, and to productivity improvements, which increased property-level margins and incentive management fees. Additionally, growth in the number of rooms contributed to the increase in base management and franchise fees. The $5 million increase in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses is primarily a result of hotel franchise agreement termination fees of $6 million received in 2007, which were associated with properties, primarily our Fairfield Inn brand, that left our system and $1 million of similar fees in 2006. The $11 million increase in general, administrative, and other expenses in 2007 primarily reflects the impact of unit growth and development and the write-off of $3 million of deferred contract acquisition costs.

2006 Compared to 2005

Across our North American Limited-Service Lodging segment, we added 91 properties (11,329 rooms) and 28 properties (3,647 rooms) left the system in 2006. The properties that left the system were primarily associated with our Fairfield Inn brand.

In 2006, RevPAR for comparable company-operated North American limited-service properties increased by 9.1 percent to $84.41. Occupancy for these properties decreased by 0.8 percentage points to 73.3 percent, and average daily rates increased by 10.4 percent to $115.24.

The $77 million increase in segment results for 2006 primarily reflects a $77 million increase in base management, incentive management, and franchise fees, $27 million of lower general, administrative, and other expenses, and $6 million of increased equity results, partially offset by a $14 million decrease in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses and a $19 million decrease in gains and other income. The increase in fees is largely due to higher RevPAR, driven by rate increases, which impacted property-level house profits and, to a lesser extent, to 2006 productivity improvements and the growth in the number of rooms. Stronger performance at our renovated Courtyard properties, versus nonrenovated properties, also contributed to the increase in segment results over the prior year. The decrease in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses reflects lower lease revenue as a result of our sale, late in 2005, of a portfolio of land underlying 75 Courtyard hotels, partially offset by improved owned and leased results in 2006 reflecting stronger demand.

The decrease in general, administrative, and other expenses of $27 million is attributable to the recognition of expenses in 2005 totaling $11 million associated with our bedding incentive program, a $6 million litigation charge and a $3 million guarantee charge. Improved equity results in 2006 versus 2005 reflect the impact of a stronger demand environment in 2006, new joint ventures and the impact of owning a 50 percent interest in the Courtyard Joint Venture through the first quarter of 2005 versus owning a 21 percent interest thereafter. For additional information regarding the Courtyard Joint Venture, see the “Courtyard Joint Venture” caption in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our 2005 Form 10-K. Gains and other income decreased by $19 million in 2006 as a result of the 2005 sale of a portfolio of land that generated gains and other income of $17 million, a $10 million gain in 2005 associated with the repayment, before maturity, to us of the loan we made to the Courtyard Joint Venture, partially offset by higher other real estate and other gains of $4 million in 2006 and increased income of $4 million in 2006 associated with cost method joint ventures.

International LodgingincludesInternational Marriott Hotels & Resorts, International JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, International Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, International Courtyard, International Fairfield Inn, International Residence Inn, Ramada International, andMarriott Executive Apartments.

            Annual Change 
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005  2007/2006  2006/2005 

Segment revenues

  $1,594  $1,411  $1,017  13% 39%
               

Segment results

  $271  $237  $133  14% 78%
               

2007 Compared to 2006

Across our International Lodging segment, we added 20 properties (4,686 rooms) and 31 properties (4,678 rooms) left the system in 2007.

In 2007, RevPAR for comparable company-operated international properties increased by 8.2 percent to $127.44. Occupancy for these properties increased by 0.8 percentage points to 75.7 percent, and average daily rates increased by 7.0 percent to $168.30. Results for our international operations were strong across most regions. RevPAR increases as compared to the prior year were particularly strong in Central and South East Asia, South America, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe.

The $34 million increase in segment results in 2007 as compared to 2006, reflects a $27 million increase in base management, incentive management, and franchise fees, an $11 million increase in gains and other income, and a $3 million increase in joint venture equity earnings, partially offset by $7 million of higher general, administrative, and other expenses. Incentive management fees included $2 million for 2007 that were calculated based on prior periods’ earnings, but not earned and due until recognized, compared to $10 million of similar fees in 2006.

The increase in fees is largely due to strong demand and higher RevPAR, driven by rate increases and favorable exchange rates. The $11 million increase in gains and other income reflects higher gains in 2007 on real estate sales, as compared to the year-ago period, offset by lower gains on the sale of joint ventures. The $7 million increase in general, administrative, and other expenses from 2006 is primarily attributable to costs related to our unit growth and development. Owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses remained flat primarily reflecting hotel management and franchise agreement termination fees of $8 million received in 2007 and $12 million of similar fees in 2006, entirely offset by the improved performance of our owned and leased properties in 2007.

2006 Compared to 2005

Across our International Lodging segment, we added 22 properties (5,242 rooms) and 10 properties (3,136 rooms) left the system in 2006.

In 2006, RevPAR for comparable company-operated international properties increased by 11.1 percent to $114.61. Occupancy for these properties increased by 1.2 percentage points to 74.4 percent, and average daily rates increased by 9.4 percent to $153.99. Results for our international operations were strong across most regions. China, Mexico, Australia, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and certain Middle Eastern countries all had strong RevPAR increases.

The $104 million increase in segment results for 2006 primarily reflects a $43 million increase in base management, incentive management, and franchise fees, $37 million of lower general, administrative, and other expenses, $29 million of increased owned, leased, and other revenue net of expenses, and a $15 million increase in gains and other income, partially offset by $20 million of lower equity results. Incentive management fees included $10 million and $4 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively, that were calculated based on prior periods’ earnings, but not earned and due until the periods they were recognized. The increase in fees is largely due to higher RevPAR, driven by rate increases, which impacted property-level house profits and, to a lesser extent, to productivity improvements and the growth in the number of rooms.

Equity results decreased by $20 million in 2006 versus 2005 and reflected the recognition in 2005 of $14 million in equity earnings from a joint venture as a result of the venture’s sale of a hotel and $4 million of increased equity losses in 2006 associated with one joint venture’s hotel that was closed for renovation. The increase of $29 million in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses reflects $19 million of improved results for owned and leased properties primarily due to the stronger demand environment and an increase of $12 million for hotel agreement termination fees for several properties. The $19 million improvement in owned and leased results also reflects the impact of a $5 million charge in 2006 for depreciation expense associated with one property that was reclassified from “held for sale” to “held and used” as it was not sold within one year of its classification as “held for sale,” as had been expected.

The $15 million increase in gains and other income is primarily attributable to gains on the sale of various joint ventures throughout 2006, partially offset by a decrease in other income associated with one of the sold cost method joint venture investments. The decrease in general, administrative, and other expenses of $37 million is attributable to the recognition of expenses in 2005 totaling $5 million associated with our bedding incentive program as well as a $34 million charge in 2005 associated with the CTF transaction discussed more fully in the previous operating income disclosure. Also impacting general, administrative, and other expenses, in 2005 we recorded expenses totaling $6 million associated with two guarantees and 2006 reflected $7 million of increased expenses related to unit growth and development, systems improvements, and increased ordinary costs such as wages and benefits.

Luxury LodgingincludesThe Ritz-Carlton andBulgari Hotels & Resorts.

            Annual Change 
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005  2007/2006  2006/2005 

Segment revenues

  $1,576  $1,423  $1,333  11% 7%
               

Segment results

  $72  $63  $45  14% 40%
               

2007 Compared to 2006

Across our Luxury Lodging segment, we added 11 properties (2,529 rooms) and one property (273 rooms) left the system in 2007. In addition, we added three residential products (347 units) in 2007.

In 2007, RevPAR for comparable company-operated luxury properties increased by 9.4 percent to $227.87. Occupancy for these properties increased by 1.8 percentage points to 72.5 percent, and average daily rates increased by 6.6 percent to $314.36.

The $9 million increase in segment results, as compared to 2006, reflected a $20 million increase in base management and incentive management fees, partially offset by $3 million of lower owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses, $6 million of increased general, administrative, and other expenses, and $2 million of lower equity joint venture results. Fiscal year 2006 included $2 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006, as compared to no similar fees in 2007. The increase in fees over the prior year reflects stronger RevPAR driven by rate increases, new properties added to

the system, the receipt in 2007 of $5 million of business interruption insurance proceeds associated with hurricanes in prior years, the year-over-year favorable impact associated with the reopening, late in 2006, of two properties impacted by the same aforementioned hurricanes and increased branding fees. The $6 million increase in general, administrative, and other expenses is primarily attributable to costs related to our unit growth and development. The $3 million decrease in owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses reflected charges totaling $8 million in 2007 for depreciation expense associated with one property that was reclassified from “held and used,” as the property no longer satisfied the criteria to be classified as “held for sale,” partially offset by a favorable $3 million impact associated with the opening of a new leased property in 2007.

2006 Compared to 2005

Across our Luxury Lodging segment, we added three properties (424 rooms) and one property (229 rooms) left the system in 2006.

In 2006, RevPAR for comparable company-operated luxury properties increased by 9.7 percent to $209.88. Occupancy for these properties increased by 1.4 percentage points to 72.5 percent, and average daily rates increased by 7.5 percent to $289.50.

The $18 million increase in segment results for 2006 primarily reflects a $16 million increase in base management and incentive management fees, $7 million of lower general, administrative, and other expenses and $1 million of higher owned, leased, and other revenue net of direct expenses, partially offset by $5 million of lower gains and other income. The increase in fees is largely due to higher RevPAR, driven by rate increases, which impacted property-level house profits and, to a lesser extent, to productivity improvements, the growth in the number of rooms, and the recognition of $2 million of base management fees that were calculated based on prior periods’ results, but not earned and due until 2006.

The decrease in general, administrative, and other expenses of $7 million is attributable to a 2005 hotel management agreement performance termination cure payment of $12 million associated with one property, partially offset by a $5 million increase in expenses in 2006 reflecting costs related to unit growth and development and an increase in ordinary costs such as wages and benefits. Gains and other income decreased by $5 million in 2006 as a result of a $9 million gain in 2005 associated with the repayment before maturity of a note receivable associated with one property, partially offset by gains totaling $3 million associated with the 2006 sale of a preferred interest in one property.

Timeshare includes ourMarriott Vacation Club, The Ritz-Carlton Club, Grand Residences by Marriott, andHorizons by Marriott Vacation Clubbrands.

            Annual Change 
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005  2007/2006  2006/2005 

Segment Revenues

      

Segment revenues

  $2,065  $1,840  $1,721  12% 7%
               

Segment Results

      

Base management fee revenue

  $43  $34  $32   

Timeshare sales and services, net

   350   357   259   

Joint venture equity

   10   (2)  1   

Minority interest

   1   —     —     

General, administrative, and other expense

   (98)  (109)  (93)  

Gains and other income

   —     —     72   
               

Segment results

  $306  $280  $271  9% 3%
               

Sales and Services Revenue

      

Development

  $1,208  $1,112  $1,208   

Services

   315   286   151   

Financing

   195   171   72   

Other revenue

   29   8   56   
               

Sales and services revenue

  $1,747  $1,577  $1,487  11% 6%
               

Contract Sales

      

Timeshare

  $1,221  $1,207  $1,187   

Fractional

   44   42   101   

Residential

   (9)  5   22   
               

Total company

   1,256   1,254   1,310   

Timeshare

   33   28   49   

Fractional

   54   68   17   

Residential

   58   282   24   
               

Total joint venture

   145   378   90   
               

Total contract sales

  $1,401  $1,632  $1,400  -14% 17%
               

2007 Compared to 2006

Timeshare contract sales, including sales made by our timeshare joint venture projects, represent sales of timeshare interval, fractional ownership, and residential ownership products before the adjustment for percentage-of-completion accounting. Timeshare contract sales decreased by 14 percent as compared to 2006, reflecting fewer residential and fractional sales, partially offset by increased timeshare sales. Contract sales in 2006 reflected particularly strong joint venture residential sales associated with the launch of our San Francisco and Kapalua, Hawaii products.

The $225 million increase in Timeshare segment revenues from $1,840 million to $2,065 million reflected a $170 million increase in timeshare sales and services revenue, a $46 million increase in cost reimbursements revenue, and $9 million of increased base management fees. The increase in timeshare sales and services revenue primarily reflects newer projects that reached reportability thresholds in 2007 and increased services and financing revenue. Higher base management fees reflect the growing number of timeshare resorts under management. Timeshare segment revenues include $50 million and $41 million of interest income for 2007 and 2006, respectively, and note sale gains of $81 million and $77 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively, recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income on the “Timeshare sales and services” revenue line, associated with Timeshare segment notes receivable.

Segment results of $306 million in 2007 increased by $26 million over 2006 and primarily reflected $9 million of increased base management fees, $12 million of increased joint venture equity results, and $11 million of lower general, administrative, and other expenses, partially offset by $7 million of lower timeshare sales and services revenue net of expenses. Timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses of $350 million decreased by $7 million, as compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting flat development revenue net of product costs and marketing and selling costs and $12 million of increased financing revenue net of financing expenses, partially offset by the $15 million reversal of contingency reserves in 2006 and $4 million of lower services revenue net of services expenses. Flat development revenue net of product costs and marketing and selling costs reflected newer projects that reached reportability thresholds in 2007,

offset by several other projects that were approaching sell-out. The increase in financing revenue net of financing costs primarily reflects increased accretion, interest income, and higher note sale gains in 2007, as compared to 2006. As compared to the prior year, the $12 million increase in joint venture equity results primarily reflects strong demand in 2007 for our products in Kapalua, Hawaii and start-up costs in 2006 associated with that joint venture. The $11 million decrease in general, administrative, and other expenses reflected lower program and systems expenses in 2007.

2006 Compared to 2005

Timeshare contract sales increased by 17 percent in 2006. Timeshare segment revenues of $1,840 million and $1,721 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, include $41 million and $38 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively, of interest income, recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income on the “Timeshare sales and services” revenue line, associated with Timeshare segment notes receivable. The $119 million increase in Timeshare segment revenues reflects a $90 million increase in Timeshare sales and services revenue, a $27 million increase in cost reimbursements revenue, and $2 million of increased base management fees. The $90 million increase in Timeshare sales and services revenue primarily reflects $77 million of revenue in 2006 from note securitization gains. As detailed earlier in the “Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle” narrative, note securitization gains of $69 million for 2005 are not reflected in revenue, but instead are a component of gains and other income.

Segment results of $280 million in 2006 increased by $9 million over 2005. The $9 million increase includes an increase of $98 million for Timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses and a $2 million increase in base management fees, partially offset by a decline of $72 million in gains and other income, a $16 million increase in general, administrative, and other expenses, and $3 million of lower joint venture equity earnings. The increase in Timeshare sales and services revenue net of direct expenses of $98 million largely reflects $77 million of revenue in 2006 from note securitization gains. Note securitization gains of $69 million for 2005 are not reflected in revenue, but instead are a component of gains and other income. Also reflected in the $98 million variance, development revenue net of expenses increased by $14 million primarily reflecting lower development expenses in 2006 associated with projects in the early stages of development that did not reach revenue recognition thresholds and the timing of expenses associated with SOP 04-2, implemented in 2006. Additionally, the $98 million variance reflected a $15 million reversal of marketing related contingency reserves and $12 million of higher financing revenue net of expense, partially offset by $21 million of lower services revenue net of expenses. The $3 million decline in equity income primarily reflects start-up losses associated with several new joint ventures, partially offset by improved performance at other joint ventures. The $72 million decline in gains and other income primarily reflected $69 million of note securitization gains in 2005 versus the recording of note securitization gains in revenue for 2006, while the $16 million increase in general, administrative, and other expenses reflected higher program and joint venture development expenses, and customary increases in ordinary costs such as wages and benefits.

Investment in Leveraged Lease

Historically, we had a $23 million investment in an aircraft leveraged lease with Delta, which we acquired in 1994. The gross investment was comprised of rentals receivable and the residual value of the aircraft offset by unearned income. On September 14, 2005, Delta filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and informed us that it wished to restructure the lease. As a result, our investment was impaired and we had recorded pretax charges of approximately $18 million through 2006. We recorded an additional $5 million loss related to this investment in fiscal 2007. We have no remaining exposure related to this historical investment.

Effective Tax Rate

Tax credits contributed by our synthetic fuel operations have significantly reduced our effective tax rate during the last several years. As we exited the business in November 2007 our future effective tax rate is likely to increase significantly, thereby reducing our after-tax profits.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Synthetic Fuel

The tax credits provided under Internal Revenue Code Section 45K were only available for the production and sale of synthetic fuels produced from coal through December 31, 2007. Given high oil prices during 2007 and the anticipated and related phase-out of a significant portion of tax credits available for synthetic fuel produced and sold in 2007, we permanently ceased operations at our synthetic fuel facilities on November 3, 2007 and report this business as a discontinued operation. See Footnote No. 2, “Discontinued Operations,” and Footnote No. 17, “Contingencies,” in this report for additional information regarding the Synthetic Fuel segment.

2007 Compared to 2006

For 2007, the synthetic fuel operation generated revenue of $352 million versus revenue of $165 million for the prior year, primarily reflecting higher production in 2007. Production in 2006 reflected production suspensions instituted in response to high oil prices. Income from the Synthetic Fuel segment declined from $5 million in 2006 to a loss of $1 million in 2007, primarily reflecting increased operating losses associated with higher production in 2007, partially offset by increased revenue and increased tax credits associated with higher production and, on the increased operating losses, a higher tax benefit. Results for 2007 also reflect an estimated 70.71 percent phase-out of tax credits due to high oil prices versus a phase-out that was estimated at year-end 2006 to be 39 percent for 2006. Additionally, results in 2007 reflect interest costs of $8 million associated with hedges entered into in response to high oil prices.

2006 Compared to 2005

For 2006, the synthetic fuel operation generated revenue of $165 million versus revenue of $421 million for the prior year, primarily reflecting significantly lower production in 2006 as a result of production suspensions instituted in response to high oil prices. Income from the Synthetic Fuel segment declined from $125 million in 2005 to $5 million in 2006, primarily as a result of both lower production in 2006 and the estimated 39 percent phase-out of tax credits at year-end 2006 due to high oil prices in 2006. Additionally, results in 2006 reflect interest costs of $4 million associated with hedges entered into in response to high oil prices. Segment results for 2006 also reflect a $5 million charge reflecting the write-down of assets at the Alabama production facility as the adjacent mine was closed at year-end and we did not anticipate operating the facility again at this location.

Distribution Services

In 2005, we had income, net of tax, of $1 million associated with the distribution services business that we exited in 2002.

New Accounting Standards

FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (“FIN 48”) on December 30, 2006, the first day of our 2007 fiscal year. FIN 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which seeks to standardize practices associated with certain aspects of measurement and recognition in accounting for income taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement requirement for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Under FIN 48, an entity may only recognize or continue to recognize tax positions that meet a “more likely than not” threshold. We recorded the cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 of $155 million as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and additional paid-in-capital on December 30, 2006, the first day of our 2007 fiscal year. See Footnote No. 3, “Income Taxes,” for additional information.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”

We adopted FASB’s FAS No. 156 on December 30, 2006, the first day of our 2007 fiscal year. FAS No. 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities initially be measured at fair value, if practicable. It also allows an entity to subsequently elect fair value measurement for its servicing assets and liabilities. We recorded the cumulative effect of applying FAS No. 156, of $1 million, net of tax, as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on December 30, 2006. See Footnote No. 11, “Asset Securitizations,” for additional information.

Future Adoption of Accounting Standards

EITF Issue No. 06-8, “Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of Condominiums”

In November 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force of FASB (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-8, “Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of Condominiums” (“EITF 06-8”). EITF 06-8 will require condominium sales to meet the continuing investment criterion in FAS No. 66 in order to recognize profit under the

percentage of completion method. EITF 06-8 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after March 15, 2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. The cumulative effect of applying EITF 06-8, if any, will be recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption. We do not expect the impact of adoption of EITF 06-8 to be material.

FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS No. 157”). This standard defines fair value, establishes a methodology for measuring fair value, and expands the required disclosure for fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after JuneNovember 15, 2005.

Under the SOP, the majority2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. Provisions of FAS No. 157 must be applied prospectively as of the costs incurredbeginning of the first fiscal year in which FAS No. 157 is applied. In November 2007, the FASB agreed to sell timeshares will be charged to expense when incurred. In regards to notes receivable issuedpartially defer the effective date, for one year, of FAS No. 157, for non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in conjunction with a sale, an estimate of uncollectibility that is expected to occur must be recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time that profit is recognizedfinancial statements on a timeshare sale. Rental and other operations during holding periods must be accounted for as incidental operations, which requirerecurring basis. We are currently evaluating the impact that any excess costs be recorded as a reduction of inventory costs.

We estimate that the initial adoption of the SOP, whichFAS No. 157 will be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle inhave on our Fiscal Year 2006 financial statements, will result in a non-cash one-time pre-tax charge of approximately $150 million, consisting primarily of the write-off of deferred selling costs and establishing the required reserve on notes. We estimate that the ongoing impact of adoption will not be significant.

statements.

FASFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”

In December 2004,February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“FAS No. 123R”159”),. This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. We do not expect to elect the fair value measurement option for any financial assets or liabilities at the present time.

EITF Issue No. 07-6, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66, ‘Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,’ When the Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause”

In December 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-6, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66, ‘Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,’ When the Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause” (“EITF 07-6”). EITF 07-6 clarifies whether a buy-sell clause is a revisionprohibited form of continuing involvement that would preclude partial sales treatment under FAS No. 123, “Accounting66. EITF 07-6 is effective for Stock-Based Compensation.”new arrangements entered into and assessments of existing transactions originally accounted for under the deposit, profit-sharing, leasing, or financing methods for reasons other than the exercise of a buy-sell clause performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. We do not expect EITF 07-6 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations”

On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.141(R) We will adopt). FAS No. 123R141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under FAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. FAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. FAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which for us begins with our 2005 third quarter.

2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS No. 123R141(R) will have on our financial statements.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB No. 51”

On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51” (“FAS No. 160”). FAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires all share-based paymentsthe recognition of a non-controlling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recorded as an expense based on their fair values. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instrumentsthe non-controlling interest will be estimated using an option-pricing model adjusted for any unique characteristicsincluded in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. FAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a particular instrument. If anparent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity awardtransactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation costdeconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess ofmeasured using the fair value of the modified award overnon-controlling equity investment on the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

We estimate that adoption ofdeconsolidation date. FAS No. 123R, using160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the modified prospective method,interests of the

parent and its non-controlling interest. FAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which for us begins with our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS No. 160 will result in incremental pre-tax expense in fiscal year 2005 of approximately $20 million, basedhave on our current share-based payment compensation plans and a mid-year adoption.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Senior Living Services

On December 30, 2002, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our senior living management business to Sunrise and to sell nine senior living communities to CNL. We recorded after-tax charges of $131 million in 2002 associated with our agreement to sell our senior living management business. We completed the sales to Sunrise and CNL and a related sale of a parcel of land to Sunrise in March 2003 for $266 million. We recorded after-tax gains of $19 million in 2003.financial statements.

Distribution Services

In the third quarter of 2002, we completed a previously announced strategic review of our Distribution Services business and decided to exit that business. We completed that exit during the fourth quarter of 2002 through a combination of transferring certain facilities, closing other facilities and other suitable arrangements. We recorded after-tax charges of $40 million in 2002 in connection with the decision to exit this business.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Requirements and Our Credit Facilities

We are party to twoa multicurrency revolving credit agreementsagreement that provideprovides for borrowings and letters of up to $2 billion, expiring in 2006 ($1.5 billion expiring in Julycredit and $500 million expiring in August), which supportsupports our commercial paper programprogram. On May 14, 2007, we amended and lettersrestated this facility to increase the aggregate borrowings available under the facility from $2 billion to $2.5 billion and extended the expiration of credit. At December 31, 2004,the facility from 2011 to 2012. The material terms of the amended and restated credit agreement were otherwise unchanged. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread based on our public debt rating. Additionally, we had no loans outstanding under these facilities. Fluctuationspay annual fees on the facility at a rate also based on our public debt rating. We do not anticipate that fluctuations in the availability of the commercial paper market do notwill affect our liquidity because of the flexibility provided by our credit facilities. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at LIBOR plus a spreadfacility. We classify commercial paper as long-term debt based on our public debt rating. ability and intent to refinance it on a long-term basis.

At December 31, 2004, our cash balances combined withyear-end 2007, our available borrowing capacity amounted to $2.151 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $2.5 billion under the credit facilities amounted to approximately $2.7 billion.facility, plus our cash balance of $332 million, less letters of credit outstanding totaling $96 million, and less $585 million of outstanding commercial paper supported by the facility. We consider these resources, together with cash we expect to generate from operations, adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements, finance our long-term growth plans, meet debt service, and fulfill other cash requirements, includingrequirements. We periodically evaluate opportunities to issue and sell additional debt or equity securities, obtain credit facilities from lenders, or repurchase, refinance, or otherwise restructure our long-term debt for strategic reasons, or to further strengthen our financial position.

We issue short-term commercial paper in the repaymentUnited States and in Europe. Our commercial paper issuances are subject to the then-current demand for our commercial paper in each of these markets, as we have no commitments from buyers to purchase our Series D senior notes totaling $275 million andcommercial paper. We reserve unused capacity under our Series B senior notes totaling $200 million, both of which maturecredit facility to repay outstanding commercial paper borrowings in 2005.

the event that the commercial paper market is not available to us for any reason when outstanding borrowings mature.

We monitor the status of the capital markets and regularly evaluate the effect that changes in capital market conditions may have on our ability to execute our announced growth plans. We expect that part of our financing and liquidity needs will continue to be met through commercial paper borrowings and access to long-term committed credit facilities. If conditions in the lodging industry deteriorate, or if disruptions in the commercial paper market take place as they did in the immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001, we may be unable to place some or all of our commercial paper on a temporary or extended basis and may have to rely more on borrowings under the credit facilities,facility, which may or may not carry a higher cost than commercial paper.

Cash from Operations

Cash from operations, depreciation expense, and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2007  2006  2005

Cash from operations

  $891  $403  $516  $778  $970  $840

Depreciation expense

   133   132   145   162   155   156

Amortization expense

   33   28   42   35   33   28

Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2007 and 1.3 to 1.0 at year-end 2006. We minimize working capital through cash management, strict credit-granting policies, aggressive collection efforts, and high inventory turnover. We also have significant borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility should we need additional working capital.

Our ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the last five fiscal years, the calculations of which are detailed in Exhibit 12 to this report, are as follows:

 

Fiscal Years

2007

  2006  2005  2004  2003
4.3x  5.3x  4.6x  4.9x  3.9x

While our timeshare businessTimeshare segment generates strong operating cash flow, year-to-year cash flow varies based on the timing of both cash outlays for the acquisition and development of new resorts and cash received from purchaser financing affects annual amounts.financing. We include timeshare intervalreportable sales we finance in cash from operations when we collect cash payments or the notes are sold for cash. The following table shows the net operating activity from our timeshare businessTimeshare segment (which excludesdoes not include the portion of net income from our timeshare business, as that number is a component of income from continuing operations)operations from our Timeshare segment):

 

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Timeshare development, less the cost of sales

  $93  $(94) $(102)

New timeshare mortgages, net of collections

   (459)  (247)  (218)

Loan repurchases

   (18)  (19)  (16)

Note sale gains

   (64)  (64)  (60)

Financially reportable sales less than (in excess of) closed sales

   129   (4)  (13)

Note sale proceeds

   312   231   341 

Collection on retained interests in notes sold and servicing fees

   94   50   31 

Other cash inflows (outflows)

   26   36   (26)
   


 


 


Net cash inflows (outflows) from timeshare activity

  $113  $(111) $(63)
   


 


 


($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

Timeshare segment development (in excess of) less than cost of sales

  $(55) $(83) $40 

New Timeshare segment mortgages, net of collections

   (559)  (537)  (441)

Note repurchases

   (30)  (55)  (23)

Financially reportable sales (in excess of) less than closed sales

   (16)  61   (57)

Note sale gains

   (81)  (77)  (69)

Note sale proceeds

   515   508   399 

Collection on retained interests in notes sold and servicing fees

   106   96   90 

Other cash (outflows) inflows

   (35)  (17)  26 
             

Net cash outflows from Timeshare segment activity

  $(155) $(104) $(35)
             

Our ability to sell timeshareTimeshare segment notes depends onis dependent upon continued liquidity within the continued ability ofasset-backed and broader structured credit markets. While the recent dislocation in the capital markets has resulted in a general reduction in liquidity for new asset-backed issuances, we believe that demand remains sufficient for our continued sale of Timeshare segment notes, albeit at somewhat less favorable terms. If the liquidity of the markets decreases further, or the underlying quality of any future Timeshare segment notes we originate were to provide financing to the special purpose entities that buy the notes. Wedeteriorate, we might have increased difficulty or be unable to consummate such sales, if the underlying quality of the notes receivable we originate were to deteriorate, although we do not expect such a deterioration.

Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 0.8 to 1 at both December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004. Each of our businesses minimizes working capital through cash management, strict credit-granting policies, aggressive collection efforts and high inventory turnover. We also have significant borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facilities should we need additional working capital.

Investing Activities Cash Flows

Capital Expenditures and Other Investments.Capital expenditures of $181$671 million in 2004, $2102007, $529 million in 20032006, and $292$780 million in 2002 primarily2005 included expenditures related to the development and construction of new hotels and acquisitions of hotel properties, as well as improvementimprovements to existing properties and systems initiatives. Timeshare segment development expenditures, which are included in “Cash from Operations,” as noted in that section’s narrative, are not reflected in these numbers. Over time, we have sold lodging properties under development subject to long-term management agreements. The ability of third-party purchasers to raise the necessary debt and equity capital depends in part on the perceived risks inherent in the lodging industry and other constraints inherent in the capital markets as a whole. Although we expect to continue to consummate such real estate sales, if we were unable to do so, our liquidity could decrease and we could have increased exposure to the operating risks of owning real estate. We monitor the status of the capital markets and regularly evaluate the effect thatpotential impact on our business operations of changes in capital market conditions may have on our ability to execute our announced growth plans.conditions. We also expect to continue to make other investments in connection with adding units to our lodging business. These investments include loans and minority equity investments.

Fluctuations in the values of hotel real estate generally have little impact on the overall results of our Lodging segments becausebecause: (1) we own less than 1 percent of the total number of hotels that we operate or franchise; (2) management and franchise fees are generally based upon hotel revenues and profits versusrather than current hotel property values; and (3) our management agreements generally do not terminate upon hotel sale.

At the end of 2007, we were party to a venture that developed and marketed fractional ownership and residential interests. Subsequent to year-end 2007, we purchased our partner’s interest in the joint venture. Concurrent with this transaction, we purchased additional land from our partner as well. Cash consideration for this transaction totaled $37 million and we acquired assets and liabilities totaling $74 million and $37 million, respectively, on the date of purchase.

Dispositions.Property and asset sales generated cash proceeds of $402$745 million in 2004, $4942007, $798 million in 20032006, and $729$298 million in 2002.2005. In 2004,2007, we closed on the sales of two hotels,13 properties and we continue to operate bothfive joint venture investments. Cash proceeds of the hotels under long-term management agreements. We also disposed$90 million for a parcel of 30 land parcels, our Ramada International Hotels & Resorts franchised brand, our interestsold in 2007 are not reflected in the Two Flags joint venture, two other minority interests in joint ventures and other miscellaneous assets.$745 million as the proceeds were initially recorded as a deposit because of a contingency. Accordingly, these proceeds impacted the “Other investing activities” section of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows rather than “Dispositions.”

Loan Activity. We have made loans to owners of hotels that we operate or franchise, typically to facilitate the development of a new hotel. OverBased on historical experience, over time we expect these owners to repay the loans in accordance with the loan agreements, or earlier as the hotels mature and capital markets permit. We have also made loans to the synthetic fuel joint venture partnerLoan collections and to the purchaser of our senior living business. Loan collections,sales, net of advances during 2004,2007, amounted to $147$75 million. LoansLodging senior loans outstanding excluding timesharetotaled

$7 million (which included a current portion of $4 million) at year-end 2007 and $9 million (which included a current portion of $1 million) at year-end 2006. Lodging mezzanine and other loans totaled $206 million (which included a current portion of $18 million) at year-end 2007 and $268 million (which included a current portion of $32 million) at year-end 2006. In 2007 our notes totaled $942receivable balance associated with Lodging senior loans and Lodging mezzanine and other loans, declined by $64 million at December 31, 2004, $996and primarily reflects the repayment or sale of several loans and the reserve against an underperforming loan.

Equity and Cost Method Investments. Cash outflows of $40 million at January 2, 2004,in 2007 associated with equity and $944cost method investments primarily reflects our investments in two joint ventures. Cash outflows of $95 million at January 3, 2003. Unfunded commitments aggregating $42 million were outstanding at December 31, 2004,in 2006 associated with equity and cost method investments primarily reflects our investments in three joint ventures. Cash outflows of which we expect to fund $12$216 million in 2005 associated with equity and $26 millioncost method investments primarily reflects our establishment in total.

Other Investing Activities

A summary2005 of a 50/50 joint venture with Whitbread PLC (“Whitbread”). For additional information regarding Whitbread see Footnote No. 10, “Marriott and Whitbread Joint Venture” in our other investing outflows is shown in the table below.

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Equity investments

  $(75) $(22) $(26)

Investment in corporate-owned life insurance

   (8)  (12)  (11)

Other net cash inflows (outflows)

   2   22   (33)

Cash proceeds on sale of investment in Interval International

   —     —     63 
   


 


 


Other investing outflows

  $(81) $(12) $(7)
   


 


 


2006 Form 10-K.

Cash from Financing Activities

Debt

Debt.Debt decreased $130increased by $1,132 million in 2004,2007, from $1,455$1,833 million to $1,325$2,965 million at year-end 2007, due to the repurchaseissuance of all$346 million (book value at issuance) of our remaining zero-coupon convertible senior Liquid Yield OptionSeries I Senior Notes due 2021, also known as LYONs (“(described more fully below), the LYONs”) totaling $62issuance of $397 million the maturity(book value at issuance) of $46Series J Senior Notes (described more fully below), a net increase in commercial paper outstanding of $270 million of senior notes and other debt reductionsincreases of $22$119 million. Debt decreasedincreased by $319$96 million in 2003,2006, from $1,737 million to $1,833 million at year-end 2006, due to the $200issuance of $349 million repayment,(book value at maturity,issuance) of Series AH Senior Notes, partially offset by a net reduction in commercial paper outstanding of $184 million, and other debt in November 2003decreases of $69 million.

In 2007, we issued $350 million of aggregate principal amount of 6.375 percent Series I Senior Notes due 2017. The offering of the notes closed on June 25, 2007. We received net proceeds before expenses of approximately $346 million from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of the net pay down of $161 millionoffering. We used these proceeds for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of commercial paper borrowings. Interest on these notes will be paid on June 15 and other debt.December 15 of each year, and commenced on December 15, 2007. The notes will mature on June 15, 2017, and are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time under the terms provided in the form of note.

Also in 2007, we issued $400 million of aggregate principal amount of 5.625 percent Series J Senior Notes due 2013. The offering of the notes closed on October 19, 2007. We received net proceeds before expenses of approximately $396 million from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of the offering. We used these proceeds for general corporate purposes, including working capital, acquisitions, stock repurchases and the repayment of commercial paper borrowings. Interest on these notes will be paid on February 15 and August 15 of each year, and commenced on February 15, 2008. The notes will mature on February 15, 2013, and are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time under the terms provided in the form of note.

Both the Series I Senior Notes and the Series J Senior Notes were issued under an indenture with The Bank of New York, successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, dated as of November 16, 1998.

Our financial objectives include diversifying our financing sources, optimizing the mix and maturity of our long-term debt and reducing our working capital. At year-end 2004,2007, our long-term debt had an average interest rate of 7.56.0 percent and an average maturity of approximately 2.55.9 years. The ratio of fixed-rate long-term debt to total long-term debt was slightly lower than one as0.8 to 1.0 at year-end 2007. At the end of December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004,2007, we had long-term public debt ratings of BBB+BBB from Standard and Poor’s and Baa2 from Moody’s.

We have $500Subsequent to year-end 2007, on January 15, 2008, we made a $94 million available for future offerings under “universal shelf” registration statements we have filed with the SEC.

cash payment of principal and interest to retire, at maturity, all of our outstanding Series E Senior Notes.

Share Repurchases.We purchased 14.041.0 million shares of our sharesClass A Common Stock in 20042007 at an average price of $46.65$43.32 per share, 10.541.5 million shares of our sharesClass A Common Stock in 20032006 at an average price of $36.07$38.13 per share, and 7.851.4 million shares of our sharesClass A Common Stock in 20022005 at an average price of $32.52$32.12 per share. We purchase shares in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2004, 18.6year-end 2007, 33.2 million shares remained available for repurchase under authorizations from our Board of Directors.

Dividends.In May 2004,April 2007, our Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend by 132 percent to $0.085$0.0750 per share.

Pending Transaction

Courtyard Joint Venture

In December 2004, we and Host Marriott announced the signing of a purchase and sale agreement by which an institutional investor would obtain a 75 percent interest in the Courtyard Joint Venture. We expect the transaction, which is subject to certain closing conditions, to close in early 2005, although we cannot assure you that the sale will be completed. Currently, we and Host Marriott own equal shares in the 120 property joint venture, and with the addition of the new equity, our percentage interest in the joint venture will decline from 50 percent to 21 percent. As a result of the transaction, the pace of the Courtyard hotel reinventions, a program that renovates and upgrades Courtyard hotels, will be accelerated.

Upon closing of the transaction:

We expect that our existing mezzanine loan to the joint venture (including accrued interest) totaling approximately $249 million at December 31, 2004, will be repaid;

We expect to make available to the joint venture a seven-year subordinated loan of approximately $144 million to be funded as reinventions are completed in 2005 and 2006;

We expect to enter into a new long-term management agreement with the joint venture. As the termination of the existing management agreement is probable, we have written off our deferred contract costs related to the existing contract in the 2004 fourth quarter, resulting in a charge of $13 million; and

Upon closing of the transaction, we expect to record a gain associated with the repayment of the mezzanine loan, which will be substantially offset by our portion of the joint venture’s costs of prepaying an existing senior loan.

On an ongoing basis, we expect our interest income will decline as a result of the repayment of the mezzanine loan, and we expect lower book losses from the joint venture due to the reduction of our equity interest and improved performance at the hotels. On a long-term basis, we expect that the Courtyard reinventions will promote continued growth and maintain and enhance customer preference.

Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:year-end 2007:

Contractual Obligations

 

      Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

($ in millions)


  Total

  Less Than
1 Year


  1-3 Years

  3-5 Years

  After 5 Years

Debt1

  $1,723  $575  $147  $702  $299

Capital lease obligations1

   16   1   2   2   11

Operating leases

                    

Recourse

   1,035   93   195   205   542

Non-recourse

   544   28   38   31   447

Other long-term liabilities

   56   —     6   6   44
   

  

  

  

  

Total contractual cash obligations

  $3,374  $697  $388  $946  $1,343
   

  

  

  

  


1Includes principal as well as interest payments.

The following table summarizes our commitments as of December 31, 2004:

      Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period

Other Commercial Commitments

($ in millions)


  Total Amounts
Committed


  Less Than
1 Year


  1-3 Years

  3-5 Years

  After 5 Years

Total guarantees where Marriott International is the primary obligor

  $601  $64  $203  $121  $213

Total guarantees where Marriott International is secondarily liable

   1,909   108   209   211   1,381
   

  

  

  

  

Total other commercial commitments

  $2,510  $172  $412  $332  $1,594
   

  

  

  

  

      Payments Due by Period
($ in millions)  Total  Less Than
1 Year
  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  After
5 Years

Debt(1)

  $3,855  $300  $405  $596  $2,554

Capital lease obligations(1)

   12   1   2   2   7

Operating leases where we are the primary obligor:

          

Recourse

   1,394   121   256   219   798

Non-recourse

   439   21   30   30   358

Operating leases where we are secondarily liable

   166   30   60   43   33

Other long-term liabilities

   110   3   14   5   88
                    

Total contractual obligations

  $5,976  $476  $767  $895  $3,838
                    

 

(1)      Includes principal as well as interest payments.

 

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of year-end 2007 was $132 million and is not reflected in the Contractual Obligations table. As a large taxpayer, we are under continual audit by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities on several open tax positions, and it is possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could change during the next 52-week period. While it is possible that one or more of these examinations may be resolved in the next year, it is not anticipated that a significant impact to the unrecognized tax benefit balance will occur. See Footnote No. 3, “Income Taxes,” for additional information.

 

The following table summarizes our commitments as of year-end 2007:

 

Other Commercial Commitments

      Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
($ in millions)  Total Amounts
Committed
  Less Than
1 Year
  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  After
5 Years

Total guarantees where we are the primary obligor

  $315  $21  $89  $49  $156

Total guarantees where we are secondarily liable

   322   46   91   112   73
                    

Total other commercial commitments

  $637  $67  $180  $161  $229
                    

Our guarantees where we are the primary obligor of $315 million listed abovein the preceding table include $91$41 million forof operating profit guarantees that will not be in effect until the underlying hotels areproperties open and we begin to manageoperate the properties. Our guarantee fundings to lenders and hotel owners are generally recoverable as loans and are generally repayable to us out of future hotel cash flows and/or proceeds from the sale of hotels.

The guarantees abovewhere we are secondarily liable of $322 million in the preceding table include $349$245 million of guarantees that expire in the years 2011 through 2013, related to Senior Living Services lease obligations and lifecare bonds for which we are secondarily liable. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”) is the primary obligor of the leases and a portion of the lifecare bonds, and CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CNL”), which subsequently merged with Health Care Property Investors, Inc., is the primary obligor of the remainder of the lifecare bonds. Prior to theour sale of the Senior Living Services business at the end of the first quarter ofin 2003, these pre-existingpreexisting guarantees were guarantees by the Companyus of obligations of consolidated Senior Living Services subsidiaries. Sunrise and CNL have indemnified us for any guarantee fundings we may be called on to make in connection with these lease obligations and lifecare bonds. We do not expect to fund under thesethe guarantees.

The guarantees above alsoin the preceding table for which we are secondarily liable include lease obligations for which we became secondarily liable when we acquired the Renaissance Hotel Group N.V. in 1997, consisting of annual rent payments of approximately $63$7 million and total remaining rent payments through the initial term plus available extensions of approximately $1.56 billion. We$77 million. Most of these obligations expire at the end of the 2023 calendar year. CTF has made available €35 million in cash collateral in the event that we are also secondarily obligated for real estate taxes and other charges associated with the leases. Third parties have severally indemnified us for all payments we may be required to make in connection withfund under such guarantees (approximately €7 million [$11 million] remained at year-end 2007). As CTF obtains releases from the landlords and these obligations.hotels exit the system, our contingent liability exposure of approximately $77 million will decline. Since the time we assumed these guarantees, we have not funded any amounts and we do not expect to fund any amounts under these guarantees in the future.

Furthermore, in addition to the guarantees noted in the preceding table, we have provided a project completion guarantee to a lender for a project with an estimated aggregate total cost of $586 million. Payments for cost overruns for this project will be satisfied by the joint venture via contributions from the partners, and we are liable on a several basis with our partners in an amount equal to our pro rata ownership in the joint venture, which is

34 percent. We do not expect to fund under this guarantee. We have also provided a project completion guarantee to another lender for a project with an estimated aggregate total cost of $80 million. Payments for cost overruns for this project will be satisfied by the joint venture via contributions from the partners, and we are liable on a several basis with our partners in an amount equal to our pro rata ownership in the joint venture, which is 25 percent. We do not expect to fund under this guarantee. The carrying value of the liabilities associated with these two project completion guarantees is $7 million.

In addition to the guarantees described above, in conjunction with financing obtained for specific projects or properties owned by joint ventures in which we are a party, we may provide industry standard indemnifications to the lender for loss, liability or damage occurring as a result of the actions of the other joint venture owner or our own actions.

In addition to the guarantees noted above,previously, as of December 31, 2004, our total unfundedyear-end 2007, we had extended approximately $4 million of loan commitments amounted to $42 million at December 31, 2004. Weowners of lodging properties, under which we expect to fund $12approximately $2 million of those commitments within one year and $14 million in the following year. We do not expect to fund the remaining $16$2 million of commitments, which expire after five years.

At year-end 2007, we also have commitments to invest up to $44 million of equity for minority interests in partnerships that plan to purchase North American full-service and limited-service properties or purchase or develop hotel anchored mixed-use real estate projects, which expire as follows: $14 million withinin one yearto two years; and $2$30 million afterin three to five years.

At December 31, 2004, As of year-end 2007, we also have commitmentsa commitment to invest $37up to $25 million in a joint venture of equity forwhich we have funded $12 million and have $13 million remaining that we expect to fund within one year. As of year-end 2007, we also had a minority interestcommitment to invest up to $29 million (€20 million) in two partnerships,a joint venture in which planwe are an investor. We currently do not expect to purchase both full-service and select-service hotels in the United States.

fund under this commitment.

At December 31, 2004,year-end 2007 we also had $96 million of letters of credit outstanding on our behalf, the majority of which related to our self-insurance programs. Surety bonds issued on our behalf as of December 31, 2004,year-end 2007 totaled $486$468 million, the majority of which were requested by federal, state or local governments related to our timeshare and lodging operations, including our Timeshare segment and self-insurance programs.

As part ofIn the normal course of the hotel management business, we enter into purchase commitments to manage the daily operating needs of our hotels.hotels we manage for owners. Since we are reimbursed byfrom the hotel owners,cash flows of the hotels, these obligations have minimal impact on our net income and cash flow.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Equity Method Investments

We have equity method investments in entities that own properties for which we provide management and/or franchise services and receive a fee.fees. In addition, in some cases we provide loans, preferred equity or guarantees to these entities. Our ownership interest in these equity method investments generally varies from 10 to 50 percent. The amount of consolidated retained earnings that represents undistributed earnings attributable to our equity investments totaled $9 million at year-end 2007.

The following tables present financial data resulting from transactions with these related parties:

Income Statement Data

 

Income Statement Data          

              ($ in millions)

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Base management fees

  $72  $56  $48 

Incentive management fees

   8   4   4 

Cost reimbursements

   802   699   557 

Owned, leased, corporate housing and other revenue

   29   28   26 
   


 


 


Total revenue

  $911  $787  $635 
   


 


 


General, administrative and other

  $(33) $(11) $(11)

Reimbursed costs

   (802)  (699)  (557)

Gains and other income

   19   21   44 

Interest income

   74   77   66 

Reversal of (provision for) loan losses

   3   (2)  (5)

Equity in earnings (losses) – Synthetic fuel

   (28)  (10)  —   

Equity in earnings (losses) – Other

   (14)  (17)  (6)
Balance Sheet Data             

              ($ in millions)

  2004

  2003

    

Current assets - accounts and notes receivable

  $72  $118     

Contract acquisition costs

   24   42     

Equity method investments

   249   468     

Loans to equity method investees

   526   558     

Other long-term receivables

   3   —       

Other long-term assets

   38   30     

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

   (3)  (2)    

Other payables and accruals

   (4)  (1)    

Other long-term liabilities

   (11)  (10)    

   ($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 
  

Base management fees

  $56  $62  $83 
  

Franchise fees

   1   2   2 
  

Incentive management fees

   26   22   14 
  

Cost reimbursements

   510   649   936 
  

Owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue

   —     —     19 
               
  

Total revenue

  $593  $735  $1,054 
               
  

General, administrative, and other

  $(4) $(1) $(19)
  

Reimbursed costs

   (510)  (649)  (936)
  

Gains and other income

   25   28   54 
  

Interest expense

   (1)  (1)  —   
  

Interest income

   4   4   31 
  

(Provision for) reversal of provision for loan losses

   (12)  1   —   
  

Equity in earnings

   15   3   36 
Balance Sheet Data    
   ($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
  At Year-end
2006
    
  

Current assets-accounts and notes receivable

  $42  $76  
  

Deferred development

   2   —    
  

Contract acquisition costs

   33   34  
  

Equity and cost method investments

   316   377  
  

Loans to equity method investees

   21   27  
  

Long-term deferred tax asset, net

   1   4  
  

Current liabilities:

    
  

Other payables and accruals

   (2)  (2) 
  

Other long-term liabilities

   (16)  (13) 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)(“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:

 

it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and

 

changes in the estimate, or different estimates that could have been selected, could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosure presented below relating to them.

Marriott Rewards

Marriott Rewards is our frequent guest loyalty program. Marriott Rewards members earn points based on their monetary spending at our lodging operations, purchases of timeshare intervals,interval, fractional ownership, and residential products and, to a lesser degree, through participation in affiliated partners’ programs, such as those offered by airlinescar rental and credit card companies.

Points, which we track on members’ behalf, can be redeemed for stays at most of our lodging operations, airline tickets, airline frequent flyer program miles, rental cars, and a variety of other awards; however, points cannot be redeemed for cash. We provide Marriott Rewards as a marketing program to participating properties. We charge the cost of operating the program, including the estimated cost of award redemption, to properties based on members’ qualifying expenditures.

We defer revenue received from managed, franchised, and Marriott-owned/leased hotels and program partners equal to the fair value of our future redemption obligation. We determine the fair value of the future redemption obligation based on statistical formulas whichthat project timing of future point redemption based on historical levels, including an estimate of the “breakage” for points that will never be redeemed, and an estimate of the points that will eventually be redeemed. These judgmentaljudgment factors determine the required liability for outstanding points.

Our management and franchise agreements require that we be reimbursed currently for the costs of operating the program, including marketing, promotion, communication with, and performing member services for the Marriott Rewards members. Due to the requirement that hotelsproperties reimburse us for program operating costs as incurred, we receive and recognize the balance of the revenue from hotelsproperties in connection with the Marriott Rewards program at the time such costs are incurred and expensed. We recognize the component of revenue from program partners that corresponds to program maintenance services over the expected life of the points awarded.

Upon the redemption of points, we recognize as revenue the amounts previously deferred and recognize the corresponding expense relating to the costs of the awards redeemed.

Valuation of Goodwill

We evaluate the fair value of goodwill to assess potential impairments on an annual basis, or during the year if an event or other circumstance indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of the asset. We evaluate the fair value of goodwill at the reporting unit level and make that determination based upon future cash flow projections whichthat assume certain growth projections which may or may not occur. We record an impairment loss for goodwill when the carrying value of the intangible asset is less than its estimated fair value.

Loan Loss Reserves

Lodging Senior Loans and Lodging Mezzanine and Other Loans

We measure loan impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or the estimated fair value of the collateral. For impaired loans, we establish a specific impairment reserve for the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and the present value of the expected future cash flows, whichthat assumes certain growth projections which may or may not occur, or the estimated fair value of the collateral. We apply our loan impairment policy individually to all loans in the portfolio and do not aggregate loans for the purpose of applying such policy. Where we determine that a loan is impaired, we recognize interest income on a cash basis. At December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, our recorded investment in impaired loans was $181$112 million. We havehad a $92 million allowance for credit losses, leaving $89$20 million of our investment in impaired loans for which there iswas no related allowance for credit losses. At year-end 2006, our recorded investment in impaired loans was $92 million. We had a $70 million allowance for credit losses, leaving $22 million of our investment in impaired loans for which there was no related allowance for credit losses. During 2007 and 2006, our average investment in impaired loans totaled $102 million and $138 million, respectively.

Loans to Timeshare Owners

In accordance with the adoption of SOP 04-2 in 2006, we record an estimate of expected uncollectibility on notes receivable that we receive from timeshare purchasers as a reduction of revenue at the time we recognize profit on a timeshare sale. We assess uncollectibility based on pools of receivables, because we hold large numbers of homogeneous timeshare notes receivable. We estimate uncollectibles based on historical activity for similar timeshare notes receivable over the past three years. We use a technique referred to as static pool analysis, which tracks uncollectibles for each year’s sales over the life of those notes. At year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, our allowance for credit losses associated with “Loans to timeshare owners” totaled $19 million and $29 million, respectively.

Legal Contingencies

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, the outcomes of which are subject to significant uncertainty. We record an accrual for loss contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We review these accruals each reporting period and make revisions based on changes in facts and circumstances.

Income Taxes

We record the current year amounts payable or refundable, as well as the consequences of events that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences in how those events are treated for tax purposes. We base our estimate of deferred tax assets and liabilities on current tax laws and rates and, in certain cases, business plans and other expectations about future outcomes.

Changes in existing laws and rates and their related interpretations, and future business results may affect the amount of deferred tax liabilities or the valuation of deferred tax assets over time. Our accounting for deferred tax consequences represents management’s best estimate of future events that can be appropriately reflected in the accounting estimates.

OTHER MATTERS

Audit Services

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), recently notified the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors that certain non-audit services E&Y performed in China and Japan for a large number of public companies, including Marriott, have raised questions regarding E&Y’s independence in its performance of audit services.

With respect to Marriott, from 2001 through 2004, E&Y performed tax calculation and preparation services for Marriott employees located in China and Japan, and affiliates of E&Y made payment of the relevant taxes on behalf of Marriott. The payment of those taxes involved handling of Company-related funds, which is not permitted under SEC auditor independence rules. These actions by affiliates of E&Y have been discontinued, and both the amount of the taxes and the fees paid to E&Y in connection with these services are de minimis.

The Audit Committee and E&Y discussed E&Y’s independence with respect to the Company in light of the foregoing facts. E&Y informed the Audit Committee that it does not believe that the holding and paying of those funds impaired E&Y’s independence with respect to the Company. The Company, based on its own review, also is

not aware of any additional non-audit services that may compromise E&Y’s independence in performing audit services for the Company.

Inflation

Inflation has been moderate in recent years and has not had a significant impact on our businesses.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, and foreign exchange rates.rates, and debt and equity prices, and with respect to our synthetic fuel business, changes in oil prices. We manage our exposure to these risks by monitoring available financing alternatives, through development and application of credit granting policies and by entering into derivative arrangements. We do not foresee any significant changes in either our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates or foreign exchange rates or in how such exposure is managed in the future.

We are exposed to interest rate risk on our floating-rate timeshare and notes receivable, our residual interests retained in connection with the sale of timeshare intervals,Timeshare segment notes receivable and the fair value of our fixed-rate notes receivable.

Changes in interest rates also impact our floating-rate long-term debt and the fair value of our fixed-rate long-term debt.

We are also subject to risk from changes in debt and equity prices from our investments in debt securities and common stock, which have a carrying value of $55 million at year-end 2007, which we account for as available-for-sale securities under FAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”

We use derivative instruments as part of our overall strategy to manage our exposure to market risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. As a matter of policy, we do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

At December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, we were party to the following derivative instruments:

 

An interest rate swap agreement under which we receive a floating rate of interest and pay a fixed rate of interest. The swap modifies our interest rate exposure by effectively converting a note receivable with a fixed rate to a floating rate. The aggregate notional amount of the swap iswas $92 million and it matures in 2010.

 

Six

Four outstanding interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk associated with the residual interests we retain in conjunction with our timeshare note sales. We areHistorically, we have been required by purchasers and/or rating agencies to utilize interest rate swaps to protect the excess spread within our sold notesold-note pools. The aggregate notional amount of the swaps is $535was $157 million, and they expire through 2022.

 

Forward foreign exchange and option

Option contracts to hedge the potential volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with variations in foreign exchange rates during fiscal year 2005.2008. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the contracts iswas approximately $36$86 million, and they expire throughout 2005.2008.

 

Forward contracts to hedge forecasted transactions for contracts denominated in foreign currencies. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts was approximately $58 million, and they expire in 2008 and 2010.

Forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the foreign currency exposure related to certain monetary assets denominated in pounds sterling.assets. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the forward contracts is $36was $133 million at year-end 2007.

Oil price hedges to manage the volatility associated with oil prices and the uncertainty surrounding the potential phase-out of tax credits in 2007. The hedges cover 19 million barrels of oil and expired on December 31, 2004.2007.

The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities and the total fair value of our derivatives and other financial instruments as of December 31, 2004:year-end 2007:

 

  Maturities by Period 

($ in millions)

  Maturities by Period

   2008 2009 2010 2011   2012   There-
after
   Total
Carrying
Amount
 Total
Fair
Value
 
2005

 2006

 2007

 2008

 2009

 Thereafter

 Total
Carrying
Amount


 Total
Fair
Value


 

Assets - Maturities represent principal receipts, fair values represent assets.

   

Assets-Maturities represent expected principal receipts, fair values represent assets.

Assets-Maturities represent expected principal receipts, fair values represent assets.

 

Timeshare notes receivable

  $26  $31  $28  $26  $26  $178  $315  $315 

Timeshare segment notes receivable

  $68  $47  $42  $38   $38   $243   $476  $476 

Average interest rate

    12.79%             12.70% 

Fixed-rate notes receivable

  $12  $230  $20  $26  $1  $300  $589  $641   $17  $4  $88  $—     $—     $25   $134  $138 

Average interest rate

    12.21%             12.05% 

Floating-rate notes receivable

  $30  $53  $86  $24  $4  $156  $353  $353   $4  $—    $4  $20   $19   $32   $79  $79 

Average interest rate

    7.15%             7.04% 

Residual interests

  $63  $47  $28  $20  $13  $19  $190  $190   $81  $55  $36  $24   $16   $26   $238  $238 

Average interest rate

    7.77%             9.02% 

Liabilities - Maturities represent principal payments, fair values represent liabilities.

   

Liabilities-Maturities represent expected principal payments, fair values represent liabilities.

Liabilities-Maturities represent expected principal payments, fair values represent liabilities.

 

Fixed-rate debt

  $(488) $(14) $(12) $(306) $(311) $(192) $(1,323) $(1,348)  $(137) $(113) $(47) $(14)  $(354)  $(1,639)  $(2,304) $(2,338)

Average interest rate

    7.44%             6.12% 

Floating-rate debt

  $(1) $(1) $ —    $—    $—    $—    $(2) $(2)  $(34) $—    $—    $—     $—     $(585)  $(619) $(619)

Average interest rate

    2.08%             5.53% 

Derivatives - Maturities represent notional amounts, fair values represent assets (liabilities).

   

NOTE: We classify commercial paper as long-term debt based on our ability and intent to refinance it on a long-term basis.

NOTE: We classify commercial paper as long-term debt based on our ability and intent to refinance it on a long-term basis.

 

Derivatives-Maturities represent notional amounts; fair values represent assets (liabilities).

Derivatives-Maturities represent notional amounts; fair values represent assets (liabilities).

 

Interest Rate Swaps:

               

Fixed to variable

  $—    $ —    $—    $—    $—    $468  $(2) $(2)  $—    $—    $93  $—     $238   $123   $(7) $(7)

Average pay rate

    4.36%             4.02% 

Average receive rate

    2.64%             3.64% 

Variable to fixed

  $—    $—    $—    $—    $—    $159  $2  $2   $—    $—    $—    $—     $—     $34   $—    $—   

Average pay rate

    2.96%             5.23% 

Average receive rate

    5.23%             4.01% 

Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts:

   

Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts:

            

Fixed (Euro) to Fixed ($U.S.)

  $21  $—    $—    $—    $—    $—    $—    $—   

Fixed (EUR) to Fixed (USD)

  $69  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average exchange rate

    1.30              1.47  

Fixed (GPB) to Fixed ($U.S.)

  $51  $—    $—    $—    $—    $—    $—    $—   

Fixed (GBP) to Fixed (USD)

  $46  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average exchange rate

    1.88              2.00  

Fixed (HKD) to Fixed (USD)

  $38  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average Exchange Rate

            0.13  

Fixed (MXN) to Fixed (USD)

  $13  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average Exchange Rate

            0.09  

Fixed (JPY) to Fixed (USD)

  $3  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average Exchange Rate

            0.01  

Fixed (CAD) to Fixed (USD)

  $43  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average Exchange Rate

            1.02  

Fixed (THB) to Fixed (USD)

  $39  $—    $25  $—     $—     $—     $—    $—   

Average Exchange Rate

            0.03  

Oil Price Hedges:

            

Contract Amount

  $14  $—    $—    $—     $—     $—     $4  $4 

(Contract volume is 19 million barrels)

            

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The following financial information is included on the pages indicated:

 

   Page

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

  4361

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

  4462

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  4563

Consolidated StatementStatements of Income

  4664

Consolidated Balance SheetSheets

  4765

Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows

  4866

Consolidated StatementStatements of Comprehensive Income

  4967

Consolidated StatementStatements of Shareholders’ Equity

  5068

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  5169

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Marriott International, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is supported by written policies and procedures thatthat: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,28, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO Framework)“COSO Framework”). Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls.

Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2004,28, 2007, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this report, havehas issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, a copy of which appears on the next page of this annual report.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

TheTo the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Marriott International, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Marriott International, Inc. maintained effective’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,28, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“the COSO criteria”). Marriott International, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting - included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Marriott International, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Marriott International, Inc. maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,28, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.

criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheetsheets of Marriott International, Inc. as of December 31, 200428, 2007 and January 2, 2004,December 29, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, comprehensive income and shareholders’ equity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 200428, 2007, of Marriott International, Inc. and our report dated February 21, 200514, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 21, 200514, 2008

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Marriott International, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Marriott International, Inc. as of December 31, 200428, 2007 and January 2, 2004,December 29, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, comprehensive income and shareholders’ equity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2004.28, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Marriott International, Inc. as of December 31, 200428, 2007 and January 2, 2004,December 29, 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2004,28, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, in 2007 the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” and FASB Statement No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets.” In 2006 the Company changed its accounting for real estate time-sharing transactions in connection with the adoption of Statement of Position 04-2, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-sharing Transactions,” and changed its accounting for stock-based compensation in connection with the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.”

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Marriott International, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,28, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 200514, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 21, 200514, 2008

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF INCOME

Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 20032005

($ in millions, except per share amounts)

 

   2004

  2003

  2002

 

REVENUES

             

Base management fees1

  $435  $388  $379 

Franchise fees

   296   245   232 

Incentive management fees1

   142   109   162 

Owned, leased, corporate housing and other revenue1

   730   633   651 

Timeshare interval sales and services

   1,247   1,145   1,059 

Cost reimbursements1

   6,928   6,192   5,739 

Synthetic fuel

   321   302   193 
   


 


 


    10,099   9,014   8,415 
   


 


 


OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

             

Owned, leased and corporate housing - direct

   629   505   580 

Timeshare - direct

   1,039   1,011   938 

Reimbursed costs1

   6,928   6,192   5,739 

General, administrative and other1

   607   523   510 

Synthetic fuel

   419   406   327 
   


 


 


    9,622   8,637   8,094 
   


 


 


OPERATING INCOME

   477   377   321 

Gains and other income1

   164   106   132 

Interest expense

   (99)  (110)  (86)

Interest income1

   146   129   122 

Benefit from (provision for) loan losses1

   8   (7)  (12)

Equity in earnings (losses) - Synthetic fuel1

   (28)  10   —   

                                             - Other1

   (14)  (17)  (6)
   


 


 


INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST

   654   488   471 

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

   (100)  43   (32)
   


 


 


INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST

   554   531   439 

Minority interest

   40   (55)  —   
   


 


 


INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

   594   476   439 

Discontinued Operations

             

Income (loss) from Senior Living Services, net of tax

   —     26   (108)

Income (loss) from Distribution Services, net of tax

   2   —     (54)
   


 


 


NET INCOME

  $596  $502  $277 
   


 


 


EARNINGS PER SHARE – Basic

             

Earnings from continuing operations

  $2.62  $2.05  $1.83 

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations

   .01   .11   (.68)
   


 


 


Earnings per share

  $2.63  $2.16  $1.15 
   


 


 


EARNINGS PER SHARE – Diluted

             

Earnings from continuing operations

  $2.47  $1.94  $1.74 

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations

   .01   .11   (.64)
   


 


 


Earnings per share

  $2.48  $2.05  $1.10 
   


 


 


DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE

  $0.330  $0.295  $0.275 
   


 


 


   2007  2006  2005 

REVENUES

    

Base management fees(1)

  $620  $553  $497 

Franchise fees(1)

   439   390   329 

Incentive management fees(1)

   369   281   201 

Owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue(1)

   1,240   1,119   944 

Timeshare sales and services (including note sale gains of $81 million for 2007 and $77 million for 2006)

   1,747   1,577   1,487 

Cost reimbursements(1)

   8,575   8,075   7,671 
             
   12,990   11,995   11,129 

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

    

Owned, leased, and corporate housing-direct

   1,062   936   778 

Timeshare-direct

   1,397   1,220   1,228 

Reimbursed costs(1)

   8,575   8,075   7,671 

General, administrative, and other(1)

   768   677   753 
             
   11,802   10,908   10,430 
             

OPERATING INCOME

   1,188   1,087   699 

Gains and other income(1)

   97   74   149 

Interest expense(1)

   (184)  (124)  (106)

Interest income(1)

   38   49   79 

(Provision for) reversal of provision for loan losses(1)

   (17)  3   (28)

Equity in earnings(1)

   15   3   36 
             

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST

  

 

1,137

 

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

829

 

Provision for income taxes

   (441)  (380)  (284)

Minority interest

   1   —     (2)
             

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

   697   712   543 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax

   —     (109)  —   

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   (1)  5   126 
             

NET INCOME

  $696  $608  $669 
             

EARNINGS PER SHARE-Basic

    

Earnings from continuing operations

  $1.85  $1.76  $1.26 

Losses from cumulative effect of accounting change

   —     (0.27)  —   

Earnings from discontinued operations

   —     0.01   0.29 
             

Earnings per share

  $1.85  $1.50  $1.55 
             

EARNINGS PER SHARE-Diluted

    

Earnings from continuing operations

  $1.75  $1.65  $1.17 

Losses from cumulative effect of accounting change

   —     (0.25)  —   

Earnings from discontinued operations

   —     0.01   0.28 
             

Earnings per share

  $1.75  $1.41  $1.45 
             

DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE

  $0.2875  $0.2400  $0.2000 
             

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


1(1)

See Footnote 20,No. 21, “Related Party Transactions,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure of related party amounts.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSHEETS

December 31, 2004,Fiscal Year-end 2007 and January 2, 20042006

($ in millions)

 

  December 31,
2004


 January 2,
2004


   2007 2006 

ASSETS

      

Current assets

      

Cash and equivalents

  $770  $229   $332  $191 

Accounts and notes receivable1

   797   728 

Accounts and notes receivable(1)

   1,148   1,060 

Inventory

   1,557   1,186 

Current deferred taxes, net

   162   215    185   200 

Assets held for sale

   123   411 

Discontinued operations

   53   91 

Other

   217   175    174   180 
  


 


       
   1,946   1,347    3,572   3,319 

Property and equipment

   2,389   2,513    1,329   1,233 

Intangible assets

      

Goodwill

   923   923    921   921 

Contract acquisition costs1

   513   526 

Contract acquisition costs(1)

   635   575 
  


 


       
   1,436   1,449    1,556   1,496 

Equity method investments1

   249   468 

Equity and cost method investments(1)

   343   402 

Notes receivable

      

Loans to equity method investees1

   526   558 

Loans to equity method investees(1)

   21   27 

Loans to timeshare owners

   289   152    408   316 

Other notes receivable

   374   389    171   217 
  


 


       
   1,189   1,099    600   560 

Other long-term receivables1

   326   387 

Deferred taxes, net

   397   251 

Other1

   736   663 

Other long-term receivables

   176   178 

Deferred taxes, net(1)

   678   665 

Other(1)

   688   735 
  


 


       
  $8,668  $8,177   $8,942  $8,588 
  


 


       

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      

Current liabilities

      

Current portion of long-term debt

  $489  $64   $175  $15 

Accounts payable1

   570   584 

Accounts payable(1)

   789   658 

Accrued payroll and benefits

   508   412    642   614 

Self-insurance reserves

   71   43 

Other payables and accruals1

   416   385 

Liability for guest loyalty program

   302   282    421   384 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   —     102 

Timeshare segment deferred revenue

   101   178 

Liabilities related to discontinued operations

   13   55 

Other payables and accruals(1)

   735   516 
  


 


       
   2,356   1,770    2,876   2,522 

Long-term debt

   836   1,391    2,790   1,818 

Liability for guest loyalty program

   971   847 

Self-insurance reserves

   163   169    182   184 

Liability for guest loyalty program

   640   502 

Other long-term liabilities1

   580   501 

Minority interest

   12   6 

Other long-term liabilities(1)

   694   599 

Shareholders’ equity

      

Class A common stock

   3   3 

Additional paid-in capital

   3,423   3,317 

Class A Common Stock

   5   5 

Additional paid-in-capital

   3,531   3,617 

Retained earnings

   1,951   1,505    3,332   2,860 

Deferred compensation

   (108)  (81)

Treasury stock, at cost

   (1,197)  (865)   (5,490)  (3,908)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   9   (41)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   51   44 
  


 


       
   4,081   3,838    1,429   2,618 
  


 


       
  $8,668  $8,177   $8,942  $8,588 
  


 


       

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


1(1)

See Footnote 20,No. 21, “Related Party Transactions,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure of related party amounts.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004, and January 3, 2003

($ in millions)

   2004

  2003

  2002

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

             

Income from continuing operations

  $594  $476  $439 

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operating activities:

             

Income from discontinued operations

   2   7   9 

Discontinued operations – gain (loss) on sale/exit

   —     19   (171)

Depreciation and amortization

   166   160   187 

Minority interest in results of synthetic fuel operation

   (40)  55   —   

Income taxes

   (63)  (171)  (105)

Timeshare activity, net

   113   (111)  (63)

Other

   (77)  (73)  223 

Working capital changes:

             

Accounts receivable

   (6)  (81)  (31)

Other current assets

   (16)  11   60 

Accounts payable and accruals

   218   111   (32)
   


 


 


Net cash provided by operating activities

   891   403   516 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

             

Capital expenditures

   (181)  (210)  (292)

Dispositions

   402   494   729 

Loan advances

   (129)  (241)  (237)

Loan collections and sales

   276   280   124 

Other

   (81)  (12)  (7)
   


 


 


Net cash provided by investing activities

   287   311   317 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

             

Commercial paper, net

   —     (102)  102 

Issuance of long-term debt

   20   14   26 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (99)  (273)  (946)

Redemption of convertible debt

   (62)  —     (347)

Issuance of Class A common stock

   206   102   35 

Dividends paid

   (73)  (68)  (65)

Purchase of treasury stock

   (664)  (373)  (252)

Earn-outs received, net

   35   17   —   
   


 


 


Net cash used in financing activities

   (637)  (683)  (1,447)
   


 


 


INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS

   541   31   (614)

CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

   229   198   812 
   


 


 


CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, end of year

  $770  $229  $198 
   


 


 


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMECASH FLOWS

Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 20032005

($ in millions)

��

   2004

  2003

  2002

 

Net income

  $596  $502  $277 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

             

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   43   37   (7)

Other

   7   (8)  (13)
   

  


 


Total other comprehensive income (loss)

   50   29   (20)
   

  


 


Comprehensive income

  $646  $531  $257 
   

  


 


   2007  2006  2005 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income

  $696  $608  $669 

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   197   188   184 

Minority interest

   (3)  (7)  (44)

Income taxes

   (150)  (76)  (86)

Timeshare activity, net

   (155)  (104)  (35)

Liability for guest loyalty program

   122   113   125 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

   —     109   —   

Working capital changes and other

   71   139   27 
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   778   970   840 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Capital expenditures

   (671)  (529)  (780)

Dispositions

   745   798   298 

Loan advances

   (31)  (59)  (56)

Loan collections and sales

   106   121   706 

Equity and cost method investments

   (40)  (95)  (216)

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

   —     (27)  (15)

Sale of available-for-sale securities

   43   —     —   

Other

   (27)  (90)  (67)
             

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   125   119   (130)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Commercial paper, net

   258   (188)  499 

Issuance of long-term debt

   820   352   356 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (153)  (17)  (523)

Debt exchange consideration, net

   —     —     (29)

Issuance of Class A Common Stock

   203   378   125 

Dividends paid

   (105)  (93)  (84)

Purchase of treasury stock

   (1,757)  (1,546)  (1,644)

Other

   (28)  15   26 
             

Net cash used in financing activities

   (762)  (1,099)  (1,274)
             

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS

   141   (10)  (564)

CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

   191   201   765 
             

CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, end of year

  $332  $191  $201 
             

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Fiscal Years 2007, 2006, and 2005

($ in millions)

   2007  2006  2005 

Net income

  $696  $608  $669 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

     

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   35   28   (25)

Other derivative instrument adjustments

   (2)  —     (2)

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities

   (8)  27   7 

Reclassification of gains upon sale of available-for-sale securities

   (18)  —     —   
             

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

   7   55   (20)
             

Comprehensive income

  $703  $663  $649 
             

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 20032005

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

  

Common

Shares

Outstanding


     Class A
Common
Stock


  Additional
Paid-in
Capital


  Deferred
Compensation


  Retained
Earnings


  Unearned
ESOP
Shares


  Treasury
Stock, at
Cost


  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income


 
  240.7  

Balance at December 29, 2001

  $3  $3,427  $(49) $941  $(291) $(503) $(50)
  —    

Net income

   —     —     —     277   —     —     —   
  —    

Dividends ($0.275 per share)

   —     —     —     (67)  —     —     —   
  3.0  

Employee stock plan issuance and other

   —     (203)  6   (25)  291   90   (20)
  (7.8)  

Purchase of treasury stock

   —     —     —     —     —     (254)  —   
  
     

  


 


 


 


 


 


  235.9  

Balance at January 3, 2003

   3   3,224   (43)  1,126   —     (667)  (70)
  —    

Net income

   —     —     —     502   —     —     —   
  —    

Dividends ($0.295 per share)

   —     —     —     (68)  —     —     —   
  5.8  

Employee stock plan issuance and other

   —     93   (38)  (55)  —     182   29 
  (10.5)  

Purchase of treasury stock

   —     —     —     —     —     (380)  —   
  
     

  


 


 


 


 


 


  231.2  

Balance at January 2, 2004

   3   3,317   (81)  1,505   —     (865)  (41)
  —    

Net income

   —     —     —     596   —     —     —   
  —    

Dividends ($0.330 per share)

   —     —     —     (75)  —     —     —   
  8.6  

Employee stock plan issuance and other

   —     106   (27)  (75)  —     322   50 
  (14.0)  

Purchase of treasury stock

   —     —     —     —     —     (654)  —   
  
     

  


 


 


 


 


 


  225.8  

Balance at December 31, 2004

  $3  $3,423  $(108) $1,951  $—    $(1,197) $9 
  
     

  


 


 


 


 


 


Common

Shares
Outstanding

     Class A
Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-in-

Capital
  Deferred
Compensation
  Retained
Earnings
  Treasury
Stock, at
Cost
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
451.6  

Balance at fiscal year-end 2004

  $5  $3,421  $(108)  $1,951  $(1,197)  $9
—    

Net income

   —     —     —     669   —     —  
—    

Dividends ($0.2000 per share)

   —     —     —     (87)   —     —  
11.6  

Employee stock plan issuance and other

   —     141   (29)   (33)   180   (20)
(51.4) 

Purchase of treasury stock

   —     —     —     —     (1,650)   —  
411.8  

Balance at fiscal year-end 2005

   5   3,562   (137)   2,500   (2,667)   (11)
—    

Net income

   —     —     —     608   —     —  
—    

Dividends ($0.2400 per share)

   —     —     —     (96)   —     —  
19.2  

Employee stock plan issuance and other

   —     192   —     (152)   343   55
—    

Impact of adoption of FAS No. 123(R)

   —     (137)   137   —     —     —  
(41.5) 

Purchase of treasury stock

   —     —     —     —     (1,584)   —  
389.5  

Balance at fiscal year-end 2006

   5   3,617   —     2,860   (3,908)   44
—    

Impact of adoption of FAS No.156

   —     —     —     1   —     —  
—    

Impact of adoption of FIN 48

   —     (121)   —     (34)   —     —  
389.5  

Opening balance fiscal year 2007

   5   3,496   —     2,827   (3,908)   44
—    

Net income

   —     —     —     696   —     —  
—    

Dividends ($0.2875 per share)

   —     —     —     (107)   —     —  
8.6  

Employee stock plan issuance and other

   —     35   —     (84)   195   7
(41.0) 

Purchase of treasury stock

   —     —     —     —     (1,777)   —  
357.1  

Balance at fiscal year-end 2007

  $5  $3,531  $—    $3,332  $(5,490)  $51

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements present the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of Marriott International, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, we, us“we,” “us,” or the Company)“Company”).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of salesrevenues and expenses during the reporting periods, and the disclosures of contingent liabilities. Accordingly, ultimate results could differ from those estimates. We have reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to our 2004 presentation.

As a result of the sale of our Senior Living Services communities and management business and the discontinuation of our Distribution Servicessynthetic fuel business on November 3, 2007, the balances and activities of twothe synthetic fuel reportable segments, Senior Living Services and Distribution Services,segment have been segregated and reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

At the beginning of our 2006 fiscal year, we adopted Statement of Position 04-2, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions,” (“SOP 04-2”) as issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The American Resort Development Association, a timeshare trade association of which we are a member and the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) had communications regarding SOP 04-2 and the income statement presentation of timeshare note securitization gains. As a result of those communications, we now classify Timeshare segment note securitization gains within our “Timeshare sales and services” revenue caption. Accordingly, Timeshare sales and services revenue reflects Timeshare segment note securitization gains of $81 million and $77 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Gains from the sale of timeshare notes receivable totaling $69 million for 2005, are classified within the “Gains and other income” caption in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We have reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to our 2007 presentation. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of December 31, 2004,at fiscal year-end 2007 and January 2, 2004,fiscal year-end 2006 and the results of our operations and cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 2003.2005. We have eliminated all material intercompany transactions and balances between entities consolidated in these financial statements.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year ends on the Friday nearest to December 31. The 2004 and 2003 fiscal years included 52 weeks, whileUnless otherwise specified, each reference to a particular year means the 2002 fiscal year included 53 weeks.ended on the date shown in the following table, rather than the corresponding calendar year:

 

Fiscal Year

  

Fiscal Year-end Date

  Fiscal Year  

Fiscal Year-end Date

2007  December 28, 2007  2003  January 2, 2004
2006  December 29, 2006  2002  January 3, 2003
2005  December 30, 2005  2001  December 28, 2001
2004  December 31, 2004  2000  December 29, 2000

Revenue Recognition

Our revenues includeinclude: (1) base management and incentive management fees,fees; (2) franchise fees,fees; (3) revenues from lodging properties and other businesses owned or leased by us,us; (4) timeshare interval sales and services, which also includes resort rental revenue, interest income associated with our “Loans to timeshare owners,” and for 2006 and 2007, Timeshare segment note securitization gains, as noted in the “Basis of Presentation” caption earlier; and (5) cost reimbursements, and (6) sales made by the synthetic fuel operation while consolidated.reimbursements. Management fees comprise a base fee, which is a percentage of the revenues of hotels, and an incentive fee, which is generally based on hotel profitability. Franchise fees comprise initial application fees and continuing royalties generated from our franchise programs, which permit the hotel owners and operators to use certain of our brand names. Cost reimbursements include direct and indirect costs that are reimbursed to us by lodging properties that we manage or franchise.

Base Management and Incentive Management Fees:Fees: We recognize base management fees as revenue when earned in accordance with the contract. In interim periods and at year-end, we recognize incentive management fees that would be due as if the contract were to terminate at that date, exclusive of any termination fees payable or receivable by us.

Franchise Fee Revenue:Revenue: We recognize franchise fees as revenue in each accounting period as fees are earned and become receivable from the franchisee.

Owned and Leased Units:Units: We recognize room sales and revenues from other guest services for our owned and leased units when rooms are occupied and services have been rendered.

Timeshare Intervals:and Fractional Intervals and Condominiums: We recognize sales whenwhen: (1) we have received a minimum of 10 percent of the purchase price for the timeshare interval,price; (2) the purchaser’s period to cancel for a refund has expired,expired; (3) we deem the receivables to be collectible,collectible; and (4) we have attained certain minimum sales and construction levels. We defer all revenue using the deposit method for sales that do not meet all four of these criteria. For sales that do not qualify for full revenue recognition as the project has progressed beyond the preliminary stages but has not yet reached completion, all revenue and profit are deferred and recognized in earnings using the percentage of completion method.

Timeshare Residential (Stand-Alone Structures): We recognize sales under the full accrual method of accounting when we receive our proceeds and transfer title at settlement.

Cost Reimbursements:Reimbursements: We recognize cost reimbursements from managed, franchised, and timeshare properties when we incur the related reimbursable costs.

Synthetic Fuel: Prior to November 7, 2003 and after March 25, 2004, we accounted for the synthetic fuel operation by consolidating the joint ventures. We recognize revenue from the synthetic fuel operation when the synthetic fuel is produced and sold. From November 7, 2003, through March 25, 2004 we accounted for the synthetic fuel operation using the equity method of accounting. See Footnote 7 “Synthetic Fuel” for additional information.

Other Revenueincludes third-party licensing fees, other branding fees, land rentrental income, and other revenue.In 2003, we recorded a $36 million insurance settlement for lost management fees associated with the New York Marriott World Trade Center hotel, which was destroyed in the 2001 terrorist attacks.revenue.

Ground Leases

We are both the lessor and lessee of land under long-term operating leases, which include scheduled increases in minimum rents. We recognize these scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the initial lease terms.

term.

Real Estate Sales

We account for the sales of real estate in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.”Estate” (“FAS No. 66”). We reduce gains on sales of real estate by the maximum exposure to loss if we have continuing involvement with the property and do not transfer substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership. We reduced gains on sales of real estate due to maximum exposure to loss by $1 million in 2004, $4 million in 2003 and $51 million in 2002. In sales transactions where we retain a management contract, the terms and conditions of the management contract are generally comparable to the terms and conditions of the management contracts obtained directly with third-party owners in competitive bid processes.

Profit Sharing Plan

We contribute to a profit sharing plan for the benefit of employees meeting certain eligibility requirements and electing participation in the plan. Contributions are determined based on a specified percentage of salary deferrals by participating employees. Excluding the discontinued Senior Living Services and Distribution Services businesses, weWe recognized compensation costcosts from profit sharing of $70$107 million in 2004, $532007, $86 million in 20032006, and $54$69 million in 2002. We recognized compensation cost from profit sharing of $1 million in 2003 and $8 million in 2002, related to the discontinued Senior Living Services and Distribution Services businesses.

2005.

Self-Insurance Programs

We are self-insured for certain levels of property, liability, workers’ compensation and employee medical coverage. We accrue estimated costs of these self-insurance programs at the present value of projected settlements for known and incurred but not reported claims. We use a discount rate of 4.84.7 percent to determine the present value of the projected settlements, which we consider to be reasonable given our history of settled claims, including payment patterns and the fixed nature of the individual settlements.

We are subject to a variety of assessments related to our insurance activities, including those by state guaranty funds and workers’ compensation second-injury funds. Our liabilities recorded for assessments are reflected within the amounts shown in our Consolidated Balance Sheets on the self-insurance reserves line, are not discounted, and totaled $5 million for both year-end 2007 and year-end 2006. Our liability of $5 million as of year-end 2007 for assessments is expected to be paid by the end of 2008.

Marriott Rewards

Marriott Rewards is our frequent guest loyalty program. Marriott Rewards members earn points based on their monetary spending at our lodging operations, purchases of timeshare intervals,interval, fractional ownership, and residential products and, to a lesser degree, through participation in affiliated partners’ programs, such as those offered by airlines and credit card companies. Points, which we accumulate and track on the members’ behalf, can be redeemed for hotel stays at most of our lodging operations, airline tickets, airline frequent flierflyer program miles, rental cars, and a variety of other awards. Pointsawards; however, points cannot be redeemed for cash.

We provide Marriott Rewards as a marketing program to participating hotels.properties. We charge the cost of operating the program, including the estimated cost of award redemption, to hotelsproperties based on members’ qualifying expenditures.

We defer revenue received from managed, and franchised, properties,and Marriott-owned/leased hotels and program partners equal to the fair value of our future redemption obligation. We determine the fair value of the future redemption obligation based on statistical formulas whichthat project timing of future point redemption based on historical levels, including an estimate of the “breakage” for points that will never be redeemed, and an estimate of the points that will eventually be redeemed. These judgmentaljudgment factors determine the required liability for outstanding points.

Our management and franchise agreements require that we be reimbursed currently for the costs of operating the program, including marketing, promotion, communication with, and performing member services for the Marriott Rewards members. Due to the requirement that propertieshotels reimburse us for program operating costs as incurred, we receive and recognize the balance of the revenue from properties in connection with the Marriott Rewards program at the time such costs are incurred and expensed. We recognize the component of revenue from program partners that corresponds to program maintenance services over the expected life of the points awarded.

Upon the redemption of points, we recognize as revenue the amounts previously deferred and recognize the corresponding expense relating to the costs of the awards redeemed. Our liability for the Marriott Rewards program was $942$1,392 million at December 31, 2004,year-end 2007 and $784$1,231 million at January 2, 2004.

year-end 2006.

Guarantees

We record a liability for the fair value of a guarantee on the date a guarantee is issued or modified. The offsetting entry depends on the circumstances in which the guarantee was issued. Funding under the guarantee reduces the recorded liability. When no funding is forecasted, the liability is amortized into income on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the guarantee.

Rebates and Allowances

We participate in various vendor rebate and allowance arrangements as a manager of hotel properties. There are three types of programs that are common in the hotel industry that are sometimes referred to as “rebates” or “allowances,” including unrestricted rebates, marketing (restricted) rebates and sponsorships. The primary business purpose of these arrangements is to secure favorable pricing for our hotel owners for various products and services or enhance resources for promotional campaigns co-sponsored by certain vendors. More specifically, unrestricted rebates are funds returned to the buyer, generally based upon volumes or quantities of goods purchased. Marketing (restricted) allowances are funds allocated by vendor agreements for certain marketing or other joint promotional initiatives. Sponsorships are funds paid by vendors, generally used by the vendor to gain exposure at meetings and events, which are accounted for as a reduction of the cost of the event.

We account for rebates and allowances as adjustments of the prices of the vendors’ products and services in accordance with EITF 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.”services. We show vendor costs and the reimbursement of those costs as reimbursed costs and cost reimbursements revenue, respectively; therefore, rebates are reflected as a reduction of these line items.

Cash and Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less at date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash, totaling $105$153 million and $139$117 million at December 31, 2004year-end 2007 and January 2, 2004year-end 2006, respectively, is recorded in otherthe “Other long-term assetsassets” line in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. Restricted cash primarily consists of deposits received on timeshare interval, fractional ownership, and residential sales that are held in escrow until the contract is closed.

Assets Held for Sale

We consider properties (other than Timeshare segment interval, fractional ownership, and residential products, which we classify as inventory) to be assets held for sale when all of the following criteria are met:

 

management commits to a plan to sell a property;

it is unlikely that the disposal plan will be significantly modified or discontinued;

the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition;

actions required to complete the sale of the property have been initiated;

sale of the property is probable and we expect the completed sale will occur within one year; and

the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable given its current market value.

Upon designation as an asset held for sale, we record the carrying value of each property at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell, and we cease depreciation.

Assets held for sale totaled $123 million at year-end 2007 and consisted of property and equipment. The $123 million total reflected the following segment composition: North American Full-Service-$17 million; North American Limited-Service-$17 million; and Luxury-$89 million. There were no liabilities of assets held for sale at year-end 2007.

Assets held for sale totaled $411 million at year-end 2006 and consisted of property and equipment of $391 million, accounts receivable of $10 million, cash of $6 million, and other assets of $4 million. The $411 million total reflected the following segment composition: International Lodging-$295 million; Luxury Lodging-$73 million; and North American Full-Service Lodging-$43 million. Liabilities of assets held for sale totaled $102 million at year-end 2006 and consisted of debt totaling $81 million, accounts payable of $11 million, accrued payroll and benefits of $8 million, and other payables and accruals of $2 million.

In 2007 we reclassified the balances associated with one property, in conformity with other “held and used” properties, as the property no longer satisfied the criteria to be classified as “held for sale.” In conjunction with that reclassification, we recorded depreciation expense of $4 million in 2007 that would have been recognized in 2006 and $4 million in late 2007 that would have been recognized earlier in 2007 had the asset been continuously classified as “held and used.”

Loan Loss ValuationReserves

Lodging Senior Loans and Lodging Mezzanine and Other Loans

We measure loan impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or the estimated fair value of the collateral. For impaired loans, we establish a specific impairment reserve for the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and the present value of the expected future cash flows or the estimated fair value of the collateral. We apply our loan impairment policy individually to all loans in the portfolio and do not aggregate loans for the purpose of applying such policy. For loans that we have determined to be impaired, we recognize interest income on a cash basis.

Loans to Timeshare Owners

We record an estimate of expected uncollectibility on notes receivable that we receive from timeshare purchasers as a reduction of revenue at the time we recognize profit on a timeshare sale. We assess uncollectibility based on pools of receivables because we hold large numbers of homogeneous timeshare notes receivable. We estimate uncollectibles based on historical activity for similar timeshare notes receivable over the past three years. We use a technique referred to as static pool analysis, which tracks uncollectibles for each year’s sales over the life of those notes.

Valuation of Goodwill

We evaluate the fair value of goodwill to assess potential impairments on an annual basis, or during the year if an event or other circumstance indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of the asset. We evaluate the fair value of goodwill at the reporting unit level and make that determination based upon future cash flow projections.projections that assume certain growth projections which may or may not occur. We record an impairment loss for goodwill when the carrying value of the intangible asset is less than its estimated fair value.

Assets Held for Sale

We consider properties to be assets held for sale when management approves and commits to a formal plan to actively market a property for sale. Upon designation as an asset held for sale, we record the carrying value of each property at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell, and we stop recording depreciation expense.

Investments

Except as otherwise required by FIN 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” weWe consolidate entities that we control. We account for investments in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting when we exercise significant influence over the venture. If we do not exercise significant influence, we account for the investment using the cost method of accounting. We account for investments in limited partnerships and limited liability companies using the equity method of accounting when we own more than a minimal investment. Our ownership interest in these equity method investments varies generally from 10 percent to 50 percent.

The fair value of our available-for-sale securities totaled $55 million and $107 million at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, respectively.We included net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities of $9 million at year-end 2007 and $35 million at year-end 2006 in accumulated other comprehensive income. The amount of net gains reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of the sale of available-for-sale securities totaled $18 million and zero for 2007 and 2006, respectively. We determined the cost basis of the securities sold using specific identification.

Costs Incurred to Sell Real Estate Projects

We capitalize directcharge the majority of sales and marketing costs incurredwe incur to sell real estate projects attributabletimeshares to and recoverable from the sales of timeshare interests until the sales are recognized. Costs eligible for capitalization follow the guidelines of FAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects.”expense when incurred. Selling and marketing costs capitalized under this approach were approximately $89 million and $69$6 million at December 31, 2004,year-end 2007 and January 2, 2004, respectively,$16 million at year-end 2006 and are included in property and equipment in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets in the “Other” caption within the “Current assets” section. If a contract is canceled, we charge unrecoverable direct selling and marketing costs to expense and record deposits forfeited as income.

Residual Interests

We periodically sell notes receivable originated by our timeshareTimeshare segment in connection with the sale of timeshare intervals.interval and fractional products. We continue to service the notes and transfer all proceeds collected to special purpose entities. We retain servicing assets and other interests in the notes and account for these assets transferred to entities that are accounted forand interests as residual interests. We treatThe interests are limited to the residual interests, excludingpresent value of cash available after paying financing expenses and program fees and absorbing credit losses. Prior to the start of the 2007 fiscal year, we measured servicing assets at the date of sale at their allocated previous carrying amount based on relative fair value, classified those assets as “trading” securitiesheld to maturity under the provisions of FAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.Securities” (“FAS No. 115”), and recorded those assets at amortized cost. On December 30, 2006, the first day of fiscal year 2007, we adopted FAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an Amendment of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 140” (“FAS No. 156”). FAS No. 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. It also allows an entity to subsequently elect fair value measurement for its servicing assets and liabilities. In conjunction with the adoption of FAS No. 156, we elected to subsequently measure our servicing assets using the fair value method. Under the fair value method, we carry servicing assets on the balance sheet at fair value and report the changes in fair value, primarily due to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions and to the collection or realization of expected cash flows, in earnings in the period in which the change occurs. For additional information regarding the adoption of FAS No. 156, see Footnote No. 11, “Asset Securitizations.

We treat the residual interests, including servicing assets, as “trading” securities under the provisions of FAS No. 115. At the dates of sale and at the end of each reporting period, we estimate the fair value of the residual interests, excludingincluding servicing assets, using a discounted cash flow model. We report changes in the fair values of these residual interests, excludingincluding servicing assets, through the accompanying Consolidated StatementStatements of Income. Servicing

The rate of prepayment of loans serviced is the most significant estimate involved in the measurement process. Estimates of prepayment rates are based on management’s expectations of future prepayment rates, reflecting our historical rate of loan repayments, industry trends, and other considerations. Actual prepayment rates differ from those projected by management due to changes in a variety of economic factors, including prevailing interest rates and the availability of alternative financing sources to borrowers. If actual prepayments of the loans being serviced were to occur more slowly than had been projected, the carrying value of servicing assets are classified as held to maturity undercould increase, and servicing income would exceed previously projected amounts. Accordingly, the provisions of FAS No. 115 and are recorded at amortized cost.

servicing assets actually realized, could differ from the amounts initially recorded.

Derivative Instruments

We use derivative instruments as part of our overall strategy to manage our exposure to market risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. As a matter of policy, we do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

We record all derivatives at fair value either as assets or liabilities. We recognize, currently in earnings, changes in fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments and of derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments. ChangesWe record changes in the fair value of the hedged item in a fair value hedge are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item and recognizedrecognize the change in the fair value of the derivative in earnings in the same income statement line item as the change in the fair value of the derivative.

item.

We record the effective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments as a component of other comprehensive income and report the ineffective portion currently in earnings. We reclassify amounts included in other comprehensive income into earnings in the same period during which the hedged item affects earnings.

Foreign Operations

The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of our consolidated and unconsolidated entities operating in the United States. The functional currency for our consolidated and unconsolidated entities operating outside of the United States is generally the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash. ForWe translate the financial statements of consolidated entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar we translate their financial statements into U.S. dollars, and we do the same, as needed, for unconsolidated entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. AssetsWe translate assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date and translate income statement accounts are translated using the weighted average exchange rate for the period. TranslationWe include translation adjustments from foreign exchange and the effect of exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature are included as a separate component of shareholder’sshareholders’ equity. We report gains and losses from foreign exchange rate changes related to intercompany receivables and payables that are not of a long-term investment nature, as well as gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, currently in operating costs and expenses, and those amounted to a $3$2 million loss in 2004,2007, a $7$6 million gain in 2003,2006, and a $6$5 million loss in 2002.

2005. Gains and other income for 2007 included $6 million attributable to currency translation adjustment gains, net of losses, from the sale or complete or substantially complete liquidation of investments. There were no similar gains or losses in 2006 or 2005.

New Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 04-2,FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-sharing Transactions,Uncertainty in Income Taxes”

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,(“FIN 48”) on December 30, 2006, the first day of our 2007 fiscal year. FIN 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which seeks to standardize practices associated with certain aspects of measurement and recognition in accounting for income taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement requirement for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Under FIN 48, an entity may only recognize or continue to recognize tax positions that meet a “more likely than not” threshold. We recorded the cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 of $155 million as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and additional paid-in-capital on December 30, 2006, the first day of our 2007 fiscal year. See Footnote No. 3, “Income Taxes,” for additional information.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amendedNo. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”

We adopted FASB’s FAS No. 156 on December 30, 2006, the first day of our 2007 fiscal year. FAS No. 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities initially be measured at fair value, if practicable. It also allows an entity to subsequently elect fair value measurement for its servicing assets and liabilities. We recorded the cumulative effect of applying FAS No. 156, of $1 million, net of tax, as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on December 30, 2006. See Footnote No. 11, “Asset Securitizations,” for additional information.

Future Adoption of Accounting Standards

EITF Issue No. 06-8, “Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of Condominiums”

In November 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force of FASB (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-8, “Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of Condominiums” (“EITF 06-8”). EITF 06-8 will require condominium sales to meet the continuing investment criterion in FAS No. 66 in order to recognize profit under the

percentage of completion method. EITF 06-8 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after March 15, 2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. The cumulative effect of applying EITF 06-8, if any, will be recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption. We do not expect the impact of adoption of EITF 06-8 to be material.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS No. 157”). This standard defines fair value, establishes a methodology for measuring fair value, and expands the required disclosure for fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. Provisions of FAS No. 157 must be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the first fiscal year in which FAS No. 157 is applied. In November 2007, the FASB agreed to partially defer the effective date, for one year, of FAS No. 157, for non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS No. 157 will have on our financial statements.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“FAS No. 159”). This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. We do not expect to elect the fair value measurement option for any financial assets or liabilities at the present time.

EITF Issue No. 07-6, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate” and FAS Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 6766, ‘Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,’ When the Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause”

In December 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-6, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental OperationsSales of Real Estate Projects,”Subject to exclude accountingthe Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66, ‘Accounting for real estate time-sharingSales of Real Estate,’ When the Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause” (“EITF 07-6”). EITF 07-6 clarifies whether a buy-sell clause is a prohibited form of continuing involvement that would preclude partial sales treatment under FAS No. 66. EITF 07-6 is effective for new arrangements entered into and assessments of existing transactions from these statements. The SOP will be effectiveoriginally accounted for under the deposit, profit-sharing, leasing, or financing methods for reasons other than the exercise of a buy-sell clause performed in fiscal years beginning after JuneDecember 15, 2005.2007, which for us begins with our 2008 fiscal year. We do not expect EITF 07-6 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations”

Under the SOP, the majority of the costs incurred to sell timeshares will be charged to expense when incurred. In regards to notes receivable issued in conjunction with a sale, an estimate of uncollectibility that is expected to occur must be recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time that profit is recognized on a timeshare sale. Rental and other operations during holding periods must be accounted for as incidental operations, which require that any excess costs be recorded as a reduction of inventory costs.

We estimate that the initial adoption of the SOP, which will be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in our Fiscal Year 2006 financial statements, will result in a one-time non-cash pre-tax charge of approximately $150 million, consisting primarily of the write-off of deferred selling costs and establishing the required reserve on notes. We estimate that the ongoing impact of adoption will not be significant.

InOn December 2004,4, 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 123 (revised 2004)141 (Revised 2007), “Share-Based Payment”“Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 123R”141(R)”), which is a revision of. FAS No. 123, “Accounting141(R) will significantly change the accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”business combinations. Under FAS No. 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to Employees,”recognize all the assets acquired and amendsliabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. FAS No. 95, “Statement141(R) also includes a substantial number of Cash Flows.” We will adoptnew disclosure requirements. FAS No. 123R141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which for us begins with our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS No. 141(R) will have on our financial statements.

Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB No. 51”

On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51” (“FAS No. 160”). FAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. FAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the non-controlling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. FAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the

parent and its non-controlling interest. FAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which for us begins with our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS No. 160 will have on our financial statements.

2.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Our synthetic fuel operations consisted of four coal-based synthetic fuel production facilities (the “Facilities”). Because tax credits under Section 45K of the Internal Revenue Code are not available for the production and sale of synthetic fuel produced from coal after calendar year-end 2007, and because high oil prices during 2007 will result in the phase-out of a significant portion of the tax credits available for synthetic fuel produced and sold in 2007, on November 3, 2007, we shut down the Facilities and permanently ceased production of synthetic fuel. Accordingly, we now report this business segment as a discontinued operation. The book value of the Facilities was zero at year-end 2007, as the Facilities have been transferred to third parties. Under the site leases for the Facilities, we were required to restore the leased premises to substantially the condition the premises were in when the leases were originally executed. However, we executed agreements with the lessors of the sites pursuant to which we transferred the Facilities to the lessors in exchange for the release of our obligations to restore the leased premises to their original condition. Costs associated with shutting down the synthetic fuel operation and transferring the Facilities to the site lessors were not material.

The following table provides additional income statement and balance sheet information relating to the discontinued operations:

Income Statement Summary

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

Revenue

  $352  $165  $421 
             

Operating loss

  $(113) $(76) $(144)

Gains and other (expense) income

   (6)  (15)  32 

Interest expense

   (8)  (4)  —   
             

Loss before income taxes and minority interest

   (127)  (95)  (112)
             

Tax benefit

   46   32   23 

Tax credits

   80   62   167 
             

Total tax benefit

   126   94   190 
             

(Loss) income before minority interest

   (1)  (1)  78 

Minority interest

   —     6   47 
             

(Loss) income on discontinued synthetic fuel business, net of tax

   (1)  5   125 

Income on discontinued distribution services business, net of tax

   —     —     1 
             

Discontinued operations, net of tax

  $(1) $5  $126 
             

Balance Sheet Summary

($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
  At Year-end
2006
 

Property, plant, and equipment

  $—    $5 

Other assets

   53   86 

Liabilities

   (13)  (55)

3.INCOME TAXES

We adopted the provisions of FIN 48, on December 30, 2006, the first day of fiscal year 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recorded a $155 million increase in the net liability for unrecognized tax positions, which was recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and additional paid-in-capital on December 30, 2006. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of year-end 2007 was $132 million. Included in the balance at year-end 2007 were $97 million of tax positions that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. As a large taxpayer, we are under continual audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other taxing authorities on several open tax positions, and it is possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could change during the next 52-week period. While it is possible that one or more of these examinations may be resolved in the next year, it is not anticipated that a significant impact to the unrecognized tax benefit balance will occur.

The unrecognized tax benefit reconciliation from beginning balance to ending balance is as follows:

($ in millions)  Amount 

Unrecognized tax benefit at beginning of year (December 30, 2006)

  $244 

Change attributable to tax positions taken during a prior period

   163 

Change attributable to tax positions taken during the current period

   5 

Decrease attributable to settlements with taxing authorities

   (279)

Decrease attributable to lapse of statute of limitations

   (1)
     

Unrecognized tax benefit at end of year (December 28, 2007)

  $132 
     

In accordance with our accounting policy, we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense. This policy did not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. Our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 28, 2007, and our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of that date include interest of $18 million and $8 million, respectively.

We file income tax returns, including returns for our subsidiaries, with federal, state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. We are participating in the IRS Compliance Assurance Program (CAP) for the 2006 and 2007 tax years and we intend to participate for 2008. This program accelerates the examination of key transactions with the goal of resolving any issues before the tax return is filed. Our 2005 federal income tax return is currently being examined by the IRS in a traditional audit process. In June 2007, we received IRS Revenue Agents Reports for both the 2000 through 2002 and 2003 through 2004 examination cycles. We have fully resolved all issues and are in the final stages of closing these years. Various state, local, and foreign income tax returns are also under examination by taxing authorities. We do not believe that the outcome of any examination will have a material impact on our financial statements.

As disclosed in our 2006 Form 10-K, the IRS was then auditing the Company’s federal tax returns for the 2000, 2001, and 2002 fiscal years. As part of that audit, the IRS reviewed a leveraged employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) feature of the Company’s Employees’ Profit Sharing, Retirement and Savings Plan (the “Plan”) that was implemented in a transaction (the “ESOP transaction”) on June 13, 2000. Principal and interest on the debt related to the transaction was forgiven over a 26-month period as a mechanism for funding Company contributions of elective deferrals and matching contributions to the Plan. We claimed federal income tax deductions for the forgiven principal on the debt in the amount of $1 billion over that period, along with forgiven interest on the debt. The benefit related to the tax deductions was reflected in equity and did not flow through the provision for income taxes.

On June 7, 2007, we reached a settlement of issues raised during the IRS’ and Department of Labor’s examination of the ESOP feature of the Plan. The settlement resulted in an after-tax charge in the 2007 second quarter totaling $54 million and a reduction in shareholders’ equity of $115 million. The $54 million charge included $35 million of excise taxes (impacting general, administrative, and other expense), $13 million of interest expense on those excise taxes, and $6 million of income tax expense primarily reflecting additional interest. As a result of the settlement, we have made cash payments to the U.S. Treasury and state tax jurisdictions of $205 million through year-end 2007. The remaining cash payments of approximately $1 million are expected to be made in 2008. The payments reflect income taxes, excise taxes, and interest charges. No penalties were assessed.

Total deferred tax assets and liabilities as of year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, were as follows:

($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Deferred tax assets

  $1,013  $1,042 

Deferred tax liabilities

   (150)  (177)
         

Net deferred taxes

  $863  $865 
         

The tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carry-forward that gives rise to a significant portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, were as follows:

($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Self-insurance

  $27  $36 

Employee benefits

   282   250 

Deferred income

   30   34 

Other reserves

   42   52 

Frequent guest program

   101   75 

Tax credits

   300   383 

Net operating loss carry-forwards

   132   126 

Timeshare financing

   (47)  (37)

Property, equipment, and intangible assets

   (45)  (32)

Other, net

   72   12 
         

Deferred taxes

   894   899 

Less: valuation allowance

   (31)  (34)
         

Net deferred taxes

  $863  $865 
         

At year-end 2007, we had approximately $74 million of tax credits that expire through 2027, $226 million of tax credits that do not expire, and $656 million of net operating losses, of which $360 million expire through 2027. The valuation allowance decreased due to foreign net operating losses that we believe will be realized and the expiration of state net operating losses.

We have made no provision for U.S. income taxes or additional foreign taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries ($738 million as of year-end 2007) because we consider these earnings to be permanently invested. These earnings could become subject to additional taxes if remitted as dividends, loaned to us or a U.S. affiliate or if we sold our interests in the affiliates. We cannot practically estimate the amount of additional taxes that might be payable on the unremitted earnings. We conduct business in countries that grant a “holiday” from income taxes for 10- and 30-year periods. The holidays expire through 2034. The aggregate amount of taxes not incurred due to tax “holidays” and the related earnings per share impacts are $22 million ($0.06 per diluted share), $22 million ($0.05 per diluted share), and $11 million ($0.02 per diluted share) for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

The (provision for) benefit from income taxes consists of:

($ in millions)

  2007  2006  2005 

Current

 

- Federal

  $(303) $(287) $(328)
 

- State

   (59)  (61)  (56)
 

- Foreign

   (61)  (56)  (35)
              
    (423)  (404)  (419)

Deferred

 

- Federal

   (10)  5   108 
 - State   1   1   19 
 

- Foreign

   (9)  18   8 
              
    (18)  24   135 
              
   $(441) $(380) $(284)
              

The current tax provision does not reflect the benefits attributable to us relating to the exercise of employee stock options of $115 million in 2007, $194 million in 2006, and $87 million in 2005. Included in the preceding table are tax credits of $4 million in each of 2007 and 2006, and $5 million in 2005. The taxes applicable to other comprehensive income are not material.

A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory tax rate to our effective income tax rate for continuing operations follows:

   2007  2006  2005 

U.S. statutory tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State income taxes, net of U.S. tax benefit

  2.8  2.9  3.0 

Nondeductible expenses

  1.4  0.3  0.3 

Change in valuation allowance

  —    (1.9) 1.7 

Foreign income

  (0.9) (1.8) (4.4)

Tax credits

  (0.3) (0.4) (0.6)

Other, net

  0.8  0.1  (0.4)
          

Effective rate

  38.8% 34.2% 34.6%
          

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, was $350 million in 2007, $169 million in 2006, and $182 million in 2005.

4.SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Under our 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (“the Comprehensive Plan”), we award: (1) stock options to purchase our Class A Common Stock (“Stock Option Program”); (2) share appreciation rights for our Class A Common Stock; (3) restricted stock units of our Class A Common Stock; and (4) deferred stock units. We grant awards at exercise prices or strike prices that are equal to the market price of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant.

We adopted FAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method at the beginning of our 2005 third2006 first quarter.

In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, we did not restate our Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods to reflect the impact of FAS No. 123R requires123(R). For all share-based paymentsawards granted after the date we adopted FAS No. 123(R) and for the unvested portion of previously granted share-based awards that were outstanding on that date, FAS No. 123(R) requires that we measure compensation costs related to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recorded as an expense based on their fair values. The grant-dateour share-based payment transactions at fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using an option-pricing model adjusted for any unique characteristics of a particular instrument. If an equity award is modified afteron the grant date incremental compensation cost will be recognizedand that we recognize those costs in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified awardfinancial statements over the fair value ofvesting period during which the original award immediately beforeemployee provides service in exchange for the modification.

We estimate that the adoption ofaward. Previously, under FAS No. 123R, using the modified prospective method, will result in incremental pre-tax expense in fiscal year 2005 of approximately $20 million, based on123 and APB Opinion No. 25, we accounted for our current share-based payment compensation plans and a mid-year adoption.

Stock-based Compensation

We have several stock-based employee compensation plans that we account for using the intrinsic value method under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB)APB Opinion No. 25 “Accountingand recognized share-based compensation expense for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, we do not reflect stock-based employee compensation cost in net incomeall awards except for our Stock Option Program awards. We recorded share-based compensation expense related to award grants of $62 million in 2005.

Under FAS No. 123(R), we recorded share-based compensation expense related to award grants of $104 million in 2007 and $108 million in 2006. Deferred compensation costs related to unvested awards totaled $162 million at year-end 2007 and $168 million at year-end 2006, and the Supplemental Executive Stock Option awards orweighted average period over which we expect the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Wedeferred compensation costs at year-end 2007 to be recognized stock-based employee compensation cost of $31 million, $19 million and $9 million, net of tax, for deferred share grants, restricted share grants and restricted stock units (2004 and 2003 only) for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.is two years.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-basedshare-based employee compensation.compensation in 2005. We have included the impact of measured but unrecognized compensation costcosts and excess tax benefits credited to additional paid-in-capital in the calculation of the diluted pro forma shares for all years presented.shares. In addition, we have included the estimated impact of reimbursements from third parties. The reported and pro forma net income and earnings per share figures for 2007 and 2006 in the table are the same because we calculate share-based compensation expense under the provisions of FAS No. 123(R). We have included the 2007 and 2006 amounts in the table below to provide detail for comparative purposes to the 2005 amounts.

 

($ in millions, except per share amounts)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Net income, as reported

  $596  $502  $277 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

   31   19   9 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects and estimated reimbursed costs

   (58)  (48)  (37)
   


 


 


Pro forma net income

  $569  $473  $249 
   


 


 


Earnings per share:

             

Basic – as reported

  $2.63  $2.16  $1.15 
   


 


 


Basic – pro forma

  $2.51  $2.03  $1.04 
   


 


 


Diluted – as reported

  $2.48  $2.05  $1.10 
   


 


 


Diluted – pro forma

  $2.35  $1.94  $0.99 
   


 


 


($ in millions, except per share amounts)  2007  2006  2005 

Net income, as reported

  $696  $608  $669 

Add: Share-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

   67   70   40 

Deduct: Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects and estimated reimbursed costs

   (67)  (70)  (61)
             

Pro forma net income

  $696  $608  $648 
             

Earnings per share:

    

Basic-as reported

  $1.85  $1.50  $1.55 
             

Basic-pro forma

  $1.85  $1.50  $1.50 
             

Diluted-as reported

  $1.75  $1.41  $1.45 
             

Diluted-pro forma

  $1.75  $1.41  $1.40 
             

FAS No. 123(R) requires that share-based compensation expense be recognized over the period from the grant date to the date on which the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional service (the “substantive vesting period”). In periods prior to the adoption of FAS No. 123(R), we showed share-based compensation expense in our pro forma disclosure only for option awards to retirement-eligible employees over the awards’ stated vesting period. In periods prior to the adoption of FAS No. 123(R), we recorded share-based compensation expense for our other awards to retirement-eligible employees over the awards’ stated vesting period. With the adoption of FAS No. 123(R), we continue to follow the stated vesting period for the unvested portion of awards granted prior to adoption of FAS No. 123(R) and follow the substantive vesting period for awards granted after the adoption of FAS No. 123(R).

In accordance with FAS No. 123(R), we present the tax benefits resulting from the exercise of share-based awards as financing cash flows. Prior to the adoption of FAS No. 123(R), we reported the tax benefits resulting from the exercise of share-based awards as operating cash flows. Tax benefits resulting from the exercise of share-based awards totaled $115 million, $194 million, and $87 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

The aggregate amount of cash we received from the exercise of stock options granted under share-based payment arrangements was $89 million, $184 million, and $125 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

We issue restricted stock units under the Comprehensive Plan to certain officers and key employees and those units vest generally over four years in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. We recognize compensation expense for the restricted stock units over the service period equal to the fair market value of the stock units on the date of issuance. Upon vesting, restricted stock units convert to shares and are distributed from treasury shares. At year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, we had approximately $145 million and $138 million, respectively, in deferred compensation costs related to restricted stock units. Share-based compensation expense associated with restricted stock units was $82 million, $77 million, and $52 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The weighted average remaining term for restricted stock unit grants outstanding at year-end 2007 was two years. Restricted stock units converted and distributed during 2007, 2006, and 2005, had aggregate intrinsic values of $147 million, $78 million, and $52 million, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair values of restricted stock units granted in 2007, 2006, and 2005 were $49, $35, and $32, respectively.

2. RELATIONSHIP WITH MAJOR CUSTOMERChanges in our outstanding restricted stock unit grants in 2007 were as follows:

 

   Number of
Restricted Stock Units
(in millions)
  Weighted
Average Grant-Date
Fair Value

Outstanding at year-end 2006

  7.6  $30

Granted during 2007

  2.3   49

Distributed during 2007

  (3.0)  26

Forfeited during 2007

  (0.2)  37
     

Outstanding at year-end 2007

  6.7   37
     

AsEmployee stock options may be granted to officers and key employees at exercise prices or strike prices equal to the market price of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Non-qualified options generally expire 10 years after the date of grant, except those issued from 1990 through 2000, which expire 15 years after the date of the grant. Most stock options under the Stock Option Program are exercisable in cumulative installments of one quarter at the end of each of the first four years following the date of grant.

We recognized compensation expense associated with employee stock options of $12 million in 2007 and $22 million in 2006. We did not recognize any compensation expense associated with employee stock options in 2005. At year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, there was approximately $6 million and $18 million, respectively, in deferred compensation costs related to employee stock options. Upon the exercise of stock options, we issue shares from treasury shares.

Changes in our outstanding Stock Option Program awards in 2007 were as follows:

   Number of Options
(in millions)
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price

Outstanding at year-end 2006

  43.9  $17

Granted during 2007

  —     49

Exercised during 2007

  (6.2)  14

Forfeited during 2007

  —     23
     

Outstanding at year-end 2007

  37.7   17
     

Stock options issued under the Stock Option Program awards outstanding at year-end 2007, were as follows:

   Outstanding  Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
  Number of
Stock

Options
(in millions)
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life

(in years)
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number of
Stock

Options
(in millions)
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life

(in years)
$6  to  $8  2.7  2  $7  2.7  $7  2
 9  to   12  1.4  4   10  1.4   10  4
 13  to   18  21.8  6   15  21.8   15  6
 19  to   25  10.3  7   22  9.4   22  7
 26  to   50  1.5  8   33  0.7   32  8
                  
 6  to   50  37.7  6   17  36.0   17  6
                  

The weighted average grant-date fair value of the 33,000 options granted in 2007 was $19 and the options had a weighted average exercise price of $49. The weighted average grant-date fair value of the 24,000 options granted in 2006 was $13 and the options had a weighted average exercise price of $34. The total intrinsic value of options outstanding at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006 was $1,279 million and $1,368 million, respectively, and the total intrinsic value for stock options exercisable as of year-end 2004, Host Marriott Corporation2007 and year-end 2006 was $624 million and $1,233 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007, 2006, and 2005 was approximately $206 million, $309 million, and $173 million, respectively.

Employee share appreciation rights (“Host Marriott”Employee SARs”) ownedmay be granted to officers and key employees at exercise prices or leased 167 lodging properties operatedstrike prices equal to the market price of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Employee SARs expire 10 years after the date of grant and generally both vest and are exercisable in cumulative installments of one quarter at the end of each of the first four years following the date of grant. Non-employee share appreciation rights (“Non-employee SARs”) may be granted to directors at exercise prices or strike prices equal to the market price of

our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Non-employee SARs expire 10 years after the date of grant and vest upon grant; however, they are generally not exercisable until one year after grant. We first began issuing share appreciation rights in 2006. On exercise of SARs, employees or Non-employee directors receive the number of shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the number of share appreciation rights that are being exercised multiplied by us under long-term agreements.the quotient of (a) the final value minus the base value, divided by (b) the final value.

We recognized compensation expense associated with Employee SARs and Non-employee SARs of $5 million in 2007 and $3 million in 2006. At the end of 2007 and 2006, we had approximately $7 million and $4 million, respectively, in deferred compensation costs related to share appreciation rights. Upon the exercise of share appreciation rights, shares are issued from treasury shares. During 2007 and 2006, we granted 0.4 million and 0.5 million, respectively, Employee SARs with a weighted average base value of $49 and $34, respectively, and a weighted average grant-date fair value of $19 and $13, respectively. During 2007 and 2006, we also granted 4,000 and 8,000, respectively, Non-employee SARs with a weighted average base value of $46 and $37, respectively, and a weighted average grant-date fair value of $20 and $18, respectively. No SARs have expired or been forfeited in 2007. The revenuestotal intrinsic value of SARs outstanding at year-end 2007 and income from continuing operations before income taxesyear-end 2006 was zero and minority interest we recognized from lodging properties owned/leased by Host Marriott$7 million, respectively, and the total intrinsic value of SARs exercisable as of year-end 2007 and year-end 2006 were each zero. The total intrinsic value of SARs exercised during 2007 was $100,000. No SARs were exercised in 2006.

We use a binomial method to estimate the fair value of each stock option or SAR granted. The assumptions for the last three fiscalstock options for all years and employee SARs for 2007 and 2006 are shownnoted in the following table:

 

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Revenues

  $2,423  $2,357  $2,400

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

   123   141   145
   2007  2006  2005 

Annual dividends

  $0.29  $0.22  $0.18 

Expected volatility

   28%  30%  30%

Risk-free interest rate

   4.8%  4.5%  4.1%

Expected life (in years)

   7   7   8 

Additionally, Host Marriott is a general partnerFor Non-employee SARs issued in several unconsolidated partnerships that own lodging properties operated by us under long-term agreements. As of year-end 2004, Host Marriott was affiliated with 121 such properties operated by us (including2007 and 2006, the propertiesonly differences in the Courtyard Joint Venture discussed below). The salesassumptions versus employee SARs were the use of risk-free interest rates of 4.6 percent and income from continuing operations before income taxes5.0 percent, respectively, and minority interest recognized byfor each year’s issuances, an expected life of 10 years.

Estimated volatilities for 2007 and 2006 were based on the Companyhistorical share-price volatility for the last three fiscal years are shown in the following table:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Revenues

  $329  $329  $387

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

   50   56   74

In December 2000, we acquired 120 Courtyard by Marriott hotels through an unconsolidated joint venture (“the Courtyard Joint Venture”) with an affiliate of Host Marriott. Priora period equal to the formationstock option’s or share appreciation right’s expected lives, ending on the day of grant, and calculated based on weekly data. The weighted average expected stock option or share appreciation right terms for 2007 and 2006 were a product of the Courtyard Joint Venture, Host Marriottlattice-based binomial valuation model that uses suboptimal exercise factors to calculate the expected terms.

We also issue deferred stock units to Non-employee directors. These Non-employee director deferred stock units vest within one year and are distributed upon election. At year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, there was approximately $227,000 and $152,000, respectively, in deferred costs related to Non-employee director deferred stock units. We recognized share-based expense associated with Non-employee director deferred stock units of $666,000, $492,000, and $416,000 for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. During 2007 we granted 20,000 Non-employee director deferred stock units with a general partnerweighted average grant-date fair value of $46. For 2006 and 2005, we granted 18,000 and 21,000 Non-employee director deferred stock units with weighted average grant-date fair values of $37 and $32, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of Non-employee director deferred stock units distributed during 2007, 2006, and 2005, was $0.3 million, $1.7 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. At year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, there were 218,000 and 203,000, respectively, Non-employee deferred stock units outstanding, and the weighted average grant-date fair value of those outstanding deferred stock units was $24 and $21, respectively.

Although the Comprehensive Plan also provides for issuance of deferred stock bonus awards, deferred stock awards, and restricted stock awards, our Compensation Policy Committee indefinitely suspended the issuance of deferred bonus stock commencing with our 2001 fiscal year and the issuance of both deferred stock awards and restricted stock awards commencing with the 2003 fiscal year. At year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, there was approximately $4 million and $8 million, respectively, in the unconsolidated partnerships that owned the 120 Courtyard by Marriott hotels. Amounts recognized from lodging properties owned by unconsolidated partnerships discussed above include the following amountsdeferred compensation costs related to these 120 Courtyard hotels:suspended award programs, and the weighted average remaining term was two years for such award grants outstanding at year-end 2007. Share-based compensation expense associated with these suspended award programs was $4 million, $6 million, and $10 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

At year-end 2007, 63 million shares were reserved under the Comprehensive Plan including 39 million shares under the Stock Option Program and Share Appreciation Right Program.

5.EARNINGS PER SHARE

The table below illustrates the reconciliation of the earnings and number of shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

 

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Revenues

  $285  $268  $267

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

   47   52   61
(in millions, except per share amounts)  2007  2006  2005

Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share

      

Income from continuing operations

  $697  $712  $543

Weighted average shares outstanding

   376.1   404.1   432.7
            

Basic earnings per share from continuing operations

  $1.85  $1.76  $1.26
            

Computation of Diluted Earnings Per Share

      

Income from continuing operations

  $697  $712  $543
            

Weighted average shares outstanding

   376.1   404.1   432.7

Effect of dilutive securities

      

Employee stock option and share appreciation rights plan

   16.8   20.2   19.0

Deferred stock incentive plan

   1.9   3.4   7.5

Restricted stock units

   2.5   2.5   3.1
            

Shares for diluted earnings per share

   397.3   430.2   462.3
            

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $1.75  $1.65  $1.17
            

We compute the effect of dilutive securities using the treasury stock method and average market prices during the period. We determine dilution based on earnings from continuing operations.

In connectionaccordance with FAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” we have not included the formationfollowing stock options and SARs in our calculation of diluted earnings per share because the Courtyard Joint Venture, we made a loan toexercise prices were greater than the joint venture. The balance on our mezzanine loan toaverage market prices for the Courtyard Joint Venture was $249applicable periods:

(a)for the year ended December 28, 2007, 0.4 million options and SARs, with exercise prices ranging from $45.91 to $49.03;

(b)for the year ended December 29, 2006, no options, and

(c)for the year ended December 30, 2005, no options.

6.INVENTORY

Inventory, totaling $1,557 million and $215$1,186 million as of December 31, 200428, 2007, and January 2, 2004, respectively. The proceedsDecember 29, 2006, respectively, consists primarily of the mezzanine loan have not been,Timeshare segment interval, fractional ownership, and will not be, used to pay our management fees, debt service or land rent income. All management fees relating to the underlying hotels that we recognize in income are paid to us in cash by the Courtyard Joint Venture.

In December 2004, we and Host Marriott announced the signing of a purchase and sale agreement by which an institutional investor would obtain a 75 percent interest in the Courtyard Joint Venture. We expect the transaction, which is subject to certain closing conditions, to close in early 2005, although we cannot assure you that the sale will be completed. Currently, we and Host Marriott own equal shares in the 120 property joint venture, and with the addition of the new equity, our percentage interest in the joint venture will decline from 50 percent to 21 percent. As a result of the transaction, the pace of the Courtyard hotel reinventions, a program that renovates and upgrades Courtyard hotels, will be accelerated.

Upon closing of the transaction:

We expect that our existing mezzanine loan to the joint venture (including accrued interest)residential products totaling approximately $249 million at December 31, 2004, will be repaid;

We expect to make available to the joint venture a seven-year subordinated loan of approximately $144 million to be funded as reinventions are completed in 2005 and 2006;

We expect to enter into a new long-term management agreement with the joint venture. As the termination of the existing management agreement is probable, we have written off our deferred contract costs related to the existing contract in the 2004 fourth quarter, resulting in a charge of $13 million; and

Upon closing of the transaction we expect to record a gain associated with the repayment of the mezzanine loan, which will be substantially offset by our portion of the joint venture’s costs of prepaying an existing senior loan.

We lease land to the Courtyard Joint Venture that had an aggregate book value of $184 million at December 31, 2004. This land has been pledged to secure debt of the lessees. We are currently deferring receipt of rentals on this land to permit the lessees to meet their debt service requirements.

We have provided Host Marriott with financing for a portion of the cost of acquiring properties to be operated or franchised by us, and may continue to provide financing to Host Marriott in the future. The outstanding principal balance of these loans was $2$1,536 million and $3$1,166 million at December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004, respectively, and we recognized less than $1 million in each of 2004 and 2003 and $1 million in 2002 in interest and fee income under these credit agreements with Host Marriott.

We have guaranteed the performance of Host Marriott and certain of its affiliates to lenders and other third parties. These guarantees were limited to $8 million at December 31, 2004. We have made no payments pursuant to these guarantees.

3. NOTES RECEIVABLE

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

 

Loans to timeshare owners

  $315  $167 

Lodging senior loans

   75   110 

Lodging mezzanine and other loans

   867   886 
   


 


    1,257   1,163 

Less current portion

   (68)  (64)
   


 


   $1,189  $1,099 
   


 


Amounts due within one year are classified as current assets in the caption accounts and notes receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet, including $26 million and $15 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2004,28, 2007, and January 2, 2004, relatedDecember 29, 2006, respectively. Inventory totaling $21 million and $20 million as of December 28, 2007, and December 29, 2006, respectively, relates to hotel operating supplies for the loans to timeshare owners.limited number of properties we own or lease. We value Timeshare segment interval, fractional ownership, and residential products at the lower of cost or net realizable value and generally value operating supplies at the lower of cost (using the first-in, first-out method) or market. Consistent with recognized industry practice, we classify Timeshare segment interval, fractional ownership, and residential products inventory, which has an operating cycle that exceeds 12 months, as a current asset.

Our notes receivable are due as follows: 2005 - $68 million; 2006 - $314 million; 2007 - $134 million; 2008 - $76 million; 2009 - $31 million; and $634 million thereafter.

At December 31, 2004, our recorded investment in impaired loans was $181 million. We have a $92 million allowance for credit losses, leaving $89 million of our investment in impaired loans for which there is no related allowance for credit losses.

7.PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The following table summarizesdetails the activity related tocomposition of our notes receivable reserve for the years ended January 3, 2003, January 2, 2004,property and December 31, 2004:equipment balances at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006.

 

($ in millions)

 

  Notes
Receivable
Reserve


 

December 29, 2001

  $98 

Additions

   12 

Write-offs

   (16)

Transfers and other

   16 
   


January 3, 2003

   110 

Additions

   15 

Reversals

   (8)

Write-offs

   (15)

Transfers and other

   28 
   


January 2, 2004

   130 

Additions

   3 

Reversals

   (11)

Write-offs

   (44)

Transfers and other

   14 
   


December 31, 2004

  $92 
   


4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

 

Land

  $371  $424 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

   642   606 

Furniture and equipment

   771   680 

Timeshare properties

   1,186   1,286 

Construction in progress

   100   74 
   


 


    3,070   3,070 

Accumulated depreciation

   (681)  (557)
   


 


   $2,389  $2,513 
   


 


($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Land

  $399  $316 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

   833   724 

Furniture and equipment

   900   837 

Construction in progress

   216   215 
         
   2,348   2,092 

Accumulated depreciation

   (1,019)  (859)
         
  $1,329  $1,233 
         

We record property and equipment at cost, including interest, rent, and real estate taxes incurred during development and construction. Interest capitalized as a cost of property and equipment totaled $16$49 million in 2004, $252007, $32 million in 20032006, and $43$30 million in 2002.2005. We capitalize the cost of improvements that extend the useful life of property and equipment when incurred. These capitalized costs may include structural costs, equipment, fixtures, floor, and wall coverings and paint. Allcoverings. We expense all repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (three to 40 years). Depreciation expense, including amounts related to discontinued operations, totaled $133 million in 2004, $132 million in 2003,, and $145 million in 2002. Wewe amortize leasehold improvements over the shorter of the asset life or lease term. Depreciation expense totaled $162 million in 2007, $155 million in 2006, and $156 million in 2005.

 

8.ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

5. DISPOSITIONS2007 Acquisitions

During 2007, we acquired one full-service property, one limited-service property, and one extended-stay property for cash consideration of $199 million. These three properties were acquired in conjunction with a land assemblage for a large hotel complex that is still in the formative development stage. In addition, we acquired certain land parcels in 2007 for cash consideration of $52 million. Also during 2007, we acquired the fee simple interest in the improvements of three properties and the leasehold interest in the ground underlying the three properties for cash consideration of $58 million. The purchase included one full-service property and two limited-service properties, which were each sold later in the same year.

During the first half of 2007, we were party to a venture that developed and marketed fractional ownership and residential interests. In the second half of 2007, we purchased our partner’s interest in the joint venture for $6 million. In conjunction with that transaction, we acquired assets and liabilities totaling $90 million and $84 million, respectively, on the date of the purchase. During the first half of 2007, we were party to another venture that was established to develop and market timeshare and residential interests. In the second half of 2007, we purchased our partner’s interest in that joint venture, and concurrent with this transaction, we purchased additional land and assets from our partner as well. Aggregate cash and notes payable issued for these transactions totaled $106 million, and we acquired assets and liabilities totaling $182 million and $76 million, respectively, on the date of purchase.

At year-end 2007, we were party to a venture that developed and marketed fractional and whole ownership interests. Subsequent to year-end 2007, we purchased our partner’s interest in that joint venture and concurrent with this transaction, we purchased additional land from our partner as well. Cash consideration for this transaction totaled $37 million and we acquired assets and liabilities totaling $74 million and $37 million, respectively, on the date of purchase.

20042007 Dispositions

In 2007, we sold nine properties for cash proceeds of $601 million and recognized gains totaling $24 million. We continue to operate eight of the nine properties under long-term agreements. We sold two lodging propertiesparcels of land for $79$55 million in cash netproceeds that were under development and recognized a gain of transaction costs, recognized pre-tax gains totaling $6$2 million. We also sold the fee simple interest in the improvements of three properties and the leasehold interest in the ground underlying the three properties, initially acquired in early 2007, for book value and received $58 million and deferred recognitionin cash proceeds. We continue to manage the properties under long-term agreements. Each of gains totaling $1 million due to our continuing involvement with the two properties. Weaforementioned sales was accounted for both sales under the full accrual method in accordance with FAS No. 66 “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” and will continue to operate66. During the properties under long-term management agreements. Weyear, we also sold 30our interests in five joint ventures for cash proceeds of $30 million and recognized gains totaling $13 million. We had other asset sales during the year, which generated proceeds totaling $1 million. Cash flows totaling $745 million for all the preceding dispositions in 2007 are reflected in the “Dispositions” line in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In 2007, we also sold land parcelsthat was under development. Due to a contingency in the sales contract, this sale was accounted for $55under the deposit method of FAS No. 66. Accordingly, the cash proceeds, totaling $90 million, were reflected in “Other investing activities” in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

2006 Acquisitions

During 2006, we acquired one full-service property for $130 million including aggregate cash consideration of $46 million plus the assumption of debt. In addition we acquired three other full-service properties for aggregate cash consideration of $134 million. We sold each of the four properties to third-party owners during the 2007 fiscal year.

2006 Dispositions

In 2006 we sold our interest in the 50/50 joint venture with Whitbread PLC (“Whitbread”), which held 46 hotels consisting of more than 8,000 rooms and we received approximately $164 million in cash, net of transaction costs, and we recorded pre-tax gains of $12 million.

Additionally, we sold our Ramada Internationalwhich was approximately equal to the investment’s book value. We continue to manage the hotels under the Marriott Hotels & Resorts franchised brand, which consisted primarily of investments in franchise contracts and trademarks and licenses outside of the United States, to Cendant Corporation’s Hotel Group for $33 million in cash, net of transaction costs, and recorded a pre-tax gain of $4 million.

Cendant exercised its option to redeem our interest in the Two Flags joint venture, and as a result Cendant acquired the trademarks and licenses for the Ramada and Days Inn lodging brands in the United States. We recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $13 million in connection with this transaction.Renaissance Hotels & Resorts brands. We also sold our interestsminority interest in twofive other joint ventures during 2006 for $13cash proceeds of $64 million and recognized gains of $43 million. Additionally, one cost method investee redeemed the preferred stock we held for $81 million in cash consideration and we recognized income of $25 million on the redemption.

During 2006 we also sold 10 full-service properties for cash proceeds of $487 million and recognized pre-tax gains of $6 million.

2003

We sold three lodging properties for $138 million in cash, net of transaction costs. Wetotaling $14 million.We accounted for each of the three property sales under the full accrual method in accordance with FAS No. 66 and we will continue to operate eight of the properties under long-term management agreements. The buyersold properties included eight properties purchased in 2005 from CTF Holdings Ltd. and certain of its affiliates (collectively “CTF”). For additional information regarding the CTF transaction, see the “2005 Acquisitions” caption later in this footnote. Prior to the sale of one property, leasedbalances associated with that property were reclassified in conformity with other “held and used” properties, in the first half of 2006 as the property was not expected to be sold, within one year of its classification as “held for sale.” In conjunction with that reclassification, we recorded depreciation expense of $2 million in the first half of 2006 that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as “held and used.” Cash proceeds of $26 million for one hotel sold in 2006 are not reflected in the disposition proceeds of $487 million as the proceeds were initially recorded as a deposit because of a contingency and impacted the “Other investing activities” section of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows rather than “Dispositions.” The contingency was subsequently resolved and sale accounting was achieved in 2006. Other asset sales generated cash proceeds of $2 million.

Late in 2006, we sold a 75 percent interest in a joint venture to a third party for its book value of $14 million. At the time of the sale, the joint venture’s only asset was a parcel of land. In conjunction with the sale, we made a $25 million bridge loan to the joint venture, which matured in early 2007. Following the guidance found in EITF 98-8, “Accounting for Transfers of Investments That Are in Substance Real Estate,” and FAS No. 66 due to our continuing involvement with the joint venture, we consolidated the joint venture for the period of time that the bridge loan was outstanding. Subsequent to the bridge loan’s repayment, we account for our remaining interest in the joint venture under the equity method as required by APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.”

In 1988, the Company as landlord, entered into a 59-year ground lease with a lessee for land that was improved with a hotel that is owned by the lessee. The hotel was previously branded a Marriott property. The lease contained contractual rental increases over the term of the lease and annual ground rent on the land totaled approximately $5 million in 2006. The lease also contained a provision that permitted the lessee, under certain circumstances, to purchase the land for a termfixed price. We and the lessee had various discussions in 2006 concerning the land as well as the hotel. During the 2006 second quarter, it became probable that none of 20 yearsthe proposed transactions were acceptable to both parties and the lessee indicated its intent to exercise its option to purchase the land. Accordingly, in the 2006 second quarter, we reclassified the land from the “Property and equipment” caption in our Consolidated Balance Sheets to the “Assets held for sale” caption and recorded a consolidated joint venture between$37 million non-cash charge to adjust the buyer and us. The lease payments are fixed for the first five years and variable thereafter. Our gain oncarrying amount to net realizable value. We completed the sale of $5the land, at book value, to the lessee in 2007 and this transaction is reflected in the figures noted earlier for dispositions in 2007.

2005 Acquisitions

During the third quarter of 2005, we purchased from CTF and certain of its affiliates 13 properties (in each case through a purchase of real estate, a purchase of the entity that owned the hotel, or an assignment of CTF’s leasehold rights) and certain joint venture interests from CTF for an aggregate price of $381 million. Prior to the sale, all of the properties were operated by us or our subsidiaries.

At the purchase date, we planned to sell eight of the properties to third-party owners and the balances related to these full-service properties were classified within the “Assets held for sale” and “Liabilities of assets held for sale” captions in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at year-end 2005. All eight properties were sold in 2006. One operating lease terminated in 2005. At the purchase date we operated four remaining properties under leases, three of which expire by 2012. Under the purchase and sale agreement we signed with CTF in the second quarter of 2005, we were obligated to purchase two additional properties for $17 million, the acquisition of which was postponed pending receipt of certain third-party consents. We did not purchase these additional two properties and the obligation expired.

On the closing date we and CTF also modified management agreements on 29 other CTF-leased hotels, 28 located in Europe and one located in the United States. We became secondarily liable for annual rent payments for certain of these hotels when we acquired the Renaissance Hotel Group N.V. in 1997. At the closing date, we continued to manage 16 of these hotels under new long-term management agreements; however, due to certain provisions in the management agreements, we account for these contracts as operating leases. CTF placed approximately $89 million in trust accounts to cover possible shortfalls in cash flow necessary to meet rent payments under these leases. In turn, we released CTF from its guarantees in connection with these leases. In 2007, the lease agreement associated with one of these properties was terminated. In 2007, we also entered into a transaction whereby the landlord allowed us to assume the lease agreement for another of the properties for which we then became the primary obligor. In conjunction with becoming the primary obligor, we received a $16 million distribution from the trust, and the balance of the funds was distributed to the landlord. We accounted for our receipt of trust funds as a lease incentive, the reduction of which will be recognizedrecorded on a straight-line basis as an adjustment to lease expense over the term expiring in proportion2033. At year-end 2007, approximately $38 million remained in these trust accounts for the 14 properties we still manage and account for as leases. Minimum lease payments relating to these leases are as follows: $30 million in each of 2008, 2009, and 2010; $26 million in 2011; $17 million in 2012; and $33 million thereafter, for a total of $166 million.

For 13 European leased hotels, of the gross rental charged29 properties mentioned in the preceding paragraph, CTF may terminate management agreements with us if and when CTF obtains releases from landlords of our back-up guarantees. Pending completion of the CTF-landlord agreements, we continue to expense,manage these hotels under modified management agreements and we recognized $1 millionremain secondarily liable under certain of pre-tax gains in both 2003these leases. We are also secondarily obligated for real estate taxes and 2004. We recognized a $1 million gain in 2003other charges associated with the leases. Third parties have severally indemnified us for all payments we may be required to make in connection with these obligations. Since we assumed these guarantees, we have not funded any amounts and we do not expect to fund any amounts under these guarantees in the future. CTF had originally made available €35 million in cash collateral in the event that we were required to fund under such guarantees. At year-end 2007, we still managed five of the original 13 properties. Approximately €7 million ($11 million) of cash collateral remained available at year-end 2007. Our contingent liability exposure at year-end 2007 associated with the five remaining properties totaled $77 million as also noted in Footnote No. 17, “Contingencies.” As CTF obtains releases from the landlords and these remaining hotels exit the system, our contingent liability exposure will decline.

At the closing date, we continued to manage three other hotels in the United Kingdom under amended management agreements with CTF and continued to manage 14 other properties in Asia on behalf of New World Development Company Limited and its affiliates. CTF’s principals are officers, directors, and stockholders of New World Development Company Limited. At the closing date, the owners of the United Kingdom and Asian hotels agreed to invest $17 million to renovate those properties.

We and CTF also exchanged legal releases effective as of the closing date and litigation and arbitration that was outstanding between the two companies and their affiliates was dismissed.

Simultaneously with the closing on the foregoing transactions, CTF also sold five properties and one minority joint venture interest to Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (“Sunstone”) for $419 million, eight properties to Walton Street Capital, L.L.C. (“Walton Street”) for $578 million, and two properties to Tarsadia Hotels (“Tarsadia”) for $29 million, in each case as substitute purchasers under our purchase and sale agreement with CTF. Prior to consummation of the sales, we also operated all of these properties. At closing, Walton Street and Sunstone entered into new long-term management agreements with us and agreed to invest a combined $68 million to further upgrade the 13 properties they acquired. At the closing date, the two properties purchased by Tarsadia were operated under short-term management and franchise agreements.

When we signed the purchase and sale agreement for the foregoing transactions in the 2005 second quarter, we recorded a $94 million pretax charge primarily due to the non-cash write-off of deferred contract acquisition costs associated with the termination of the existing management agreements for properties involved in these transactions. As described above, we entered into new long-term management agreements with CTF, Walton Street, and Sunstone at the closing of the transactions.

In 2005 we also purchased two full-service properties, one in Paris, France and the other in Munich, Germany, for aggregate cash consideration of $146 million. We planned to sell these two full-service properties to third-party owners and the balances related to these properties were classified within the “Assets held for sale” and “Liabilities of assets held for sale” line items on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at year-end 2005. The property in Paris, France, was sold in 2006 and the property located in Munich, Germany, was sold in 2007. The balances associated with the Munich, Germany, property were reclassified, in conformity with other “held and used” properties in the 2006 fourth quarter as the property was not sold at that time, as expected, within one year of its classification as “held for sale.” In conjunction with the 2006 reclassification, we recorded depreciation expense of $5 million in the 2006 fourth quarter that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as “held and used.”

2005 Dispositions

Late in 2005, we contributed land underlying an additional nine Courtyard hotels, worth approximately $40 million, to CBM Land Joint Venture limited partnership (“CBM Land JV”), a joint venture the majority of which was owned, at the time of the transaction, by a third party on behalf of an institutional investor, thereby obtaining a 23 percent equity stake in CBM Land JV. At the same time we completed the sale of a portfolio of land underlying 75 Courtyard by Marriott hotels for approximately $246 million in cash to CBM Land JV. In conjunction with this transaction, we recognized a gain of $17 million in 2005, we deferred recognition of a $5 million gain due to our minority interest in the other two propertiesjoint venture, and there are nowe also deferred recognition of a $40 million gain due to contingencies in the transaction documents. As those contingencies expire in subsequent years, we will recognize additional gains. In each of 2007 and 2006, we recognized gains of $4 million, and at year-end 2007, the aggregate remaining deferred gains. During the year, wegains totaled $37 million.

We also sold threea number of other land parcels of landin 2005 for $10$38 million in cash, net of transaction costs and recognized a pre-tax loss of $1 million. Additionally,gains totaling $6 million, and we sold ourtwo minority interests in three international joint ventures for approximately$14 million in cash and recognized gains totaling $7 million.

9.GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table details the composition of our goodwill and other intangible assets at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006.

($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Contract acquisition costs and other

  $899  $809 

Accumulated amortization

   (264)  (234)
         
  $635  $575 
         

Goodwill

  $1,049  $1,049 

Accumulated amortization

   (128)  (128)
         
  $921  $921 
         

We capitalize costs incurred to acquire management, franchise, and license agreements that are both direct and incremental. We amortize these costs on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the agreements, ranging from 15 to 30 years. We evaluate the carrying values of intangible assets for impairment under the provisions of FAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Amortization expense totaled $35 million in 2007, $33 million in 2006, and $28 million in 2005. Estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows: $29 million for 2008; $26 million for 2009; $26 million for 2010; $25 million for 2011; and $25 million for 2012.

10.NOTES RECEIVABLE

The following table details the composition of our notes receivable balances at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006.

($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Loans to timeshare owners

  $476  $386 

Lodging senior loans

   7   9 

Lodging mezzanine and other loans

   206   268 
         
   689   663 

Less current portion

   (89)  (103)
         
  $600  $560 
         

We classify notes receivable due within one year as current assets in the caption “Accounts and notes receivable” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, including $68 million and $70 million, as of year-end 2007 and year-end 2006, respectively, related to “Loans to timeshare owners.”

Our notes receivable are due as follows: 2008-$89 million; 2009-$51 million; 2010-$134 million; 2011-$58 million; 2012-$57 million; and $300 million thereafter. The 2007 notes receivable balance is net of unamortized discounts totaling $25 million and recorded pre-tax gainsthe 2006 notes receivable balance is net of approximately $21unamortized discounts totaling $28 million.

During the third quarter of 2003, we completed Gains from the sale of annotes receivable totaled approximately 50 percent interest$82 million, $79 million, and $94 million during 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Lodging Senior Loans and Lodging Mezzanine and Other Loans

Interest income associated with “Lodging senior loans” and “Lodging mezzanine and other loans” is reflected in the synthetic fuel operation.accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income in the “Interest income” caption. We received cashdo not accrue interest on “Lodging senior loans” and promissory notes totaling $25“Lodging mezzanine and other loans” that are impaired. At year-end 2007, our recorded investment in impaired “Lodging senior loans” and “Lodging mezzanine and other loans” was $112 million at closing, and we are receiving additional profitshad a $92 million allowance for credit losses, leaving $20 million of our investment in impaired loans for which there was no related allowance for credit losses. At year-end 2006, our recorded investment in impaired “Lodging senior loans” and “Lodging mezzanine and other loans” was $92 million and we had a $70 million allowance for credit losses, leaving $22 million of our investment in impaired loans for which there was no related allowance for credit losses. During 2007 and 2006, our average investment in impaired loans totaled $102 million and $138 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the activity related to our “Lodging senior loans” and “Lodging mezzanine and other loans” notes receivable reserve for 2005, 2006, and 2007:

($ in millions)  Notes
Receivable
Reserve
 

Year-end 2004 balance

  $92 

Additions

   11 

Reversals

   —   

Write-offs

   (9)

Transfers and other

   9 
     

Year-end 2005 balance

   103 

Additions

   —   

Reversals

   (5)

Write-offs

   (38)

Transfers and other

   10 
     

Year-end 2006 balance

   70 

Additions

   11 

Reversals

   —   

Write-offs

   —   

Transfers and other

   11 
     

Year-end 2007 balance

  $92 
     

Loans to Timeshare Owners

At year-end 2007, the weighted average interest rate for our “Loans to timeshare owners” was 12.7 percent and the stated interest rates associated with these loans ranged from zero to 19.9 percent. We reflect interest income associated with “Loans to timeshare owners” of $50 million, $41 million, and $38 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income in the “Timeshare sales and services” revenue caption. We do not accrue interest on “Loans to timeshare owners” that are expectedover 90 days past due. Our recorded investment in “Loans to continue overtimeshare owners” on nonaccrual status at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006 totaled $59 million and $67 million, respectively. We established the lifereserve for “Loans to timeshare owners” notes receivable in 2006 in conjunction with the adoption of SOP 04-2.

The following table summarizes the venture based on the actual amount of tax credits allocatedactivity related to the purchaser. See Footnote 7, “Synthetic Fuel”our “Loans to timeshare owners” notes receivable reserve for further discussion.2006 and 2007.

 

2002

($ in millions)  Notes
Receivable
Reserve
 

Year-end 2005 balance

  $—   

Establishment of reserve

   25 

Additions for current year sales

   20 

Write-offs

   (16)
     

Year-end 2006 balance

   29 

Additions for current year sales

   29 

Write-offs

   (24)

Other

   (15)
     

Year-end 2007 balance

  $19 
     

 

We sold three lodging properties and six pieces of undeveloped land for $330 million in cash. We will continue to operate two of the hotels under long-term management agreements. We accounted for two of the three property sales under the full accrual method in accordance with FAS No. 66. The buyer did not make adequate minimum initial investments in the remaining property, which we accounted for under the cost recovery method. The sale of one of the properties was to a joint venture in which we have a minority interest and was sold at a loss. We recognized no pre-tax gains in either 2004 or 2003 and $6 million of pre-tax gains in 2002. We will recognize the remaining $50 million of pre-tax gains in subsequent years, provided certain contingencies in the sales contracts expire.

We also sold our 11 percent investment in Interval International, a timeshare exchange company, for approximately $63 million and recorded a pre-tax gain of $44 million.

6. TIMESHARE NOTE SALES

11.ASSET SECURITIZATIONS

We periodically sell, with limitedwithout recourse, through special purpose entities, notes receivable originated by our timeshare businessTimeshare segment in connection with the sale of timeshare intervals.interval and fractional products. We continue to service the notes and transfer all proceeds collected to special purpose entities. We retain servicing assets and other interests in the notes which are accountedand account for these assets and interests as residual interests. The interests are limited to the present value of cash available after paying financing expenses and program fees and absorbing credit losses. Prior to the start of the 2007 fiscal year, we measured servicing assets at the date of sale at their allocated previous carrying amount based on relative fair value, classified those assets as held to maturity under the provisions of FAS No. 115 and recorded those assets at amortized cost.

On December 30, 2006, the first day of fiscal year 2007, we adopted FAS No. 156. In conjunction with the adoption of FAS No. 156, we elected to subsequently measure our servicing assets using the fair value method. Under the fair value method, we carry servicing assets on the balance sheet at fair value, and report the changes in fair value, primarily due to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions and to the collection or realization of expected cash flows, in earnings in the period in which the change occurs.

To determine the fair value of servicing assets, we use a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income, which is based on the monthly fee we receive for servicing the securitized notes. We use market assumptions in the valuation model, including estimates of prepayment speeds, default rates, and discount rates. We have inherent risk for changes in the fair value of the servicing asset but do not deem the risk significant and therefore, do not use other financial instruments to mitigate this risk.

Effective December 30, 2006, upon the remeasurement of our servicing assets at fair value, we recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to the 2007 beginning balance of retained earnings of $1 million after-tax ($2 million pretax) in our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. Accordingly, servicing assets totaled $11 million at year-end 2006 and $13 million on the first day of fiscal year 2007. At year-end 2007, servicing assets totaled $15 million.

The table below reconciles the servicing assets balance at year-end 2006, to the beginning balance on December 30, 2006.

($ in millions)  Servicing
Assets

Balance at year-end 2006 (December 29, 2006)

  $11

Remeasurement upon adoption of FAS No. 156

   2
    

Beginning balance at December 30, 2006

  $13
    

The changes in servicing assets, measured using the fair value method, were:

($ in millions)  Servicing
Assets
 

Fair value, beginning of period (December 30, 2006)

  $13 

Servicing from securitizations

   6 

Changes in fair value(1)

   (4)
     

Fair value, end of period (December 28, 2007)

  $15 
     

(1)

Principally represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time and changes in fair value due to changes in key variables listed below.

Contractually specified servicing fees, late fees, and ancillary fees earned for 2007, 2006, and 2005 totaled $6 million, $5 million, and $4 million, respectively, and were reflected within the changes in fair value to the servicing assets noted above.

We have included gains from the sales of timeshare notes receivable totaling $64$81 million in each of 20042007 and 2003 and $60$77 million in 20022006 within the “Timeshare sales and services” revenue caption in gainsour Consolidated Statements of Income. Gains from the sale of timeshare notes receivable of $69 million in 2005 are in the “Gains and other incomeincome” caption in the accompanying Consolidated StatementStatements of Income. For additional information regarding the classification of gains from the sale of timeshare notes receivable, see the “Basis of Presentation” caption in Footnote No. 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” In addition, in September 2006, we repurchased notes receivable with a principal balance of $31 million and in November 2006, sold those notes, along with $249 million of additional notes in a $280 million note securitization. The gain on the sale of these notes is included in the $77 million gain noted earlier in this paragraph.

We had residual interests of $190$238 million and $203$221 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004year-end 2007 and January 2, 2004,year-end 2006, which are recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Balance SheetSheets as other long-term receivables of $127$157 million and $120$137 million, respectively, and other current assets of $63$81 million and $83$84 million, respectively.

At the datedates of sale and at the end of each reporting period, we estimate the fair value of residual interests, excludingincluding servicing assets, using a discounted cash flow model. These transactions may utilize interest rate swaps to protect the net interest margin associated with the beneficial interest. We report in income, changes in the fair value of residual interests, excludingincluding servicing assets, as they are considered trading securities under the provisions of FAS No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt115. During 2007, 2006, and Equity Securities.”2005, we recorded trading gains of $30 million, $19 million, and $2 million, respectively. We used the following key assumptions to measure the fair value of the residual interests, excludingincluding servicing assets, at the date of sale during the years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 2003:2005: average discount rate of 7.809.02 percent, 4.959.22 percent, and 5.698.56 percent, respectively; average expected annual prepayments, including defaults, of 18.6125.02 percent, 17.0025.22 percent, and 16.4123.56 percent, respectively; expected weighted average life of prepayable notes receivable, excluding prepayments and defaults, of 8375 months, 8570 months, and 6979 months, respectively; and expected weighted average life of prepayable notes receivable, including prepayments and defaults of 4234 months, 4432 months, and 4238 months, respectively. Our key assumptions are based on experience.

We used the following key assumptions in measuring the fair value of the residual interests, excludingincluding servicing assets, forin our six11 outstanding note sales at December 31, 2004:year-end 2007: an average discount rate of 7.777.96 percent; an average expected annual prepayment rate, including defaults, of 15.8919.58 percent; an expected weighted average life of prepayable notes receivable, excluding prepayments and defaults, of 6362 months; and an expected weighted average life of prepayable notes receivable, including prepayments and defaults of 3835 months.

At the date of sale, we measure servicing assets at their allocated previous carrying amount based on relative fair value. Servicing assets are classified as held to maturity under the provisions of FAS No. 115 and are recorded at amortized cost.

Cash flows between us and third-party purchasers during the years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 3, 2003,2005, were as follows: net proceeds to us from new timeshare note sales of $312$515 million, $231$508 million, and $341$399 million, respectively; repurchases by us of defaulted loans (over 150 days overdue) of $18$30 million, $19$24 million, and $16$23 million, respectively; repurchases by us of other loans in 2006 of $31 million; servicing fees received by us of $4$6 million, $3$5 million, and $3$4 million, respectively; and cash flows received from our retained interests of $90$100 million, $47$91 million, and $28$86 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2004, $810year-end 2007, $1,263 million of principal remainsremained outstanding in all sales in which we havehad a retained residual interest. Delinquencies of more than 90 days at December 31, 2004,year-end 2007 amounted to $4$10 million. Net of recoveries, we incurred no losses onExisting reserves were adequate for defaulted loans that were resolved during the year ended December 31, 2004.2007. We have been able to resell timeshare units underlying defaulted loans without incurring material losses.

On November 21, 2002, we repurchased notes receivable with a principal balance of $381 million and immediately sold $365 million of those notes, along with $135 million of additional notes, in a $500 million sale to an investor group. We have included net proceeds from these transactions of $89 million, including repayments of interest rate swaps on the $381 million of repurchased notes receivable, in the net proceeds from new timeshare note sales disclosed above. We realized a gain of $14 million, primarily associated with the $135 million of additional notes sold, which is included in the $60 million gain on the sales of notes receivable for fiscal year 2002 disclosed above.

We have completed a stress test on the fair value of the residual interests as of year-end 2007 with the objective of measuring the change in value associated with independent changes in individual key variables. The methodology used applied unfavorable changes that would be considered statistically significant for the key variables of prepayment rate, discount rate, and weighted average remaining term. The fair value of the residual interests was $190$238 million at December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, before we applied any stress test changes were applied.changes. An increase of 100 basis points in the prepayment rate would decrease the year-end valuation by $3$4 million, or 1.71.9 percent, and an increase of 200 basis points in the prepayment rate would decrease the year-end valuation by $7$9 million, or 3.43.7 percent. An increase of 100 basis points in the discount rate would decrease the year-end valuation by $4$5 million, or 2.22.3 percent, and an increase of 200 basis points in the discount rate would decrease the year-end valuation by $8$11 million, or 4.4 percent. A decline of two months in the weighted-averageweighted average remaining term would decrease the year-end valuation by $2$3 million, or 11.1 percent, and a decline of four months in the weighted-averageweighted average remaining term would decrease the year-end valuation by $4$5 million, or 2.12.3 percent.

 

12.LONG-TERM DEBT

7. SYNTHETIC FUELOur long-term debt at year-end 2007 and year-end 2006 consisted of the following:

 

($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Senior Notes:

   

Series C, interest rate of 7.875%, face amount of $76, maturing September 15, 2009 (effective interest rate of 8.018%)

  $76  $76 

Series E, interest rate of 7.000%, face amount of $91, maturing January 15, 2008 (effective interest rate of 7.194%)

   91   91 

Series F, interest rate of 4.625%, face amount of $350, maturing June 15, 2012 (effective interest rate of 4.796%)

   349   349 

Series G, interest rate of 5.810%, face amount of $427, maturing November 10, 2015 (effective interest rate of 6.571%)

   402   399 

Series H, interest rate of 6.200%, face amount of $350, maturing June 15, 2016 (effective interest rate of 6.294%)

   349   349 

Series I, interest rate of 6.375%, face amount of $350, maturing June 15, 2017 (effective interest rate of 6.439%)

   346   —   

Series J, interest rate of 5.625%, face amount of $400, maturing February 15, 2013 (effective interest rate of 5.661%)

   397   —   

Commercial paper, average interest rate of 5.4% at year-end 2007

   585   315 

Mortgage debt, average interest rate of 7.2% at year-end 2007, maturing through May 1, 2025

   196   167 

Other

   174   87 
         
   2,965   1,833 

Less current portion

   (175)  (15)
         
  $2,790  $1,818 
         

OperationsAs of year-end 2007, all debt, other than mortgage debt and $1 million of other debt, is unsecured.

Our synthetic fuel operation currently consistsDuring 2007, we amended and restated our multicurrency revolving credit agreement, originally entered into in 2005, to increase the aggregate borrowings and letters of credit available under the facility from $2 billion to $2.5 billion and to extend the expiration of the facility from 2011 to 2012. The availability of revolving credit borrowings supports our commercial paper program. Borrowings under the facility bear interest in four coal-based synthetic fuel production facilities (the “Facilities”), two of which are locatedat the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread, based on our public debt rating. Additionally, we pay quarterly fees on the facility at a coal minerate also based on our public debt rating.

In 2005 we began issuing short-term commercial paper in Saline County, Illinois, withEurope in addition to our long-standing commercial paper program in the remaining two located at a coal mine in Jefferson County, Alabama. ThreeUnited States. Our United States and European commercial paper issuances are subject to the availability of the four plants are held in one entity, and one of the plants is held in a separate entity. The synthetic fuel produced at the Facilities through 2007 qualifies for tax credits based on Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code (credits are not available for fuel produced after 2007). Although the Facilities incur significant losses, these losses are more than offset by the tax credits generated under Section 29, which reduce our income tax expense.

At both of the locations, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into long-term site leases at sites that are adjacent to large underground minescommercial paper market, as well as barge load-out facilities on navigable rivers. In addition, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into long-term coal purchase agreements with the owners of the adjacent coal mines and long-term synthetic fuel sales contracts with the Tennessee Valley Authority and with Alabama Power Company, two major utilities. These contracts ensure that the operation has long-term agreementswe have no commitment from buyers to purchase coal and sell synthetic fuel, covering approximately 80 percent of the productiveour commercial

paper. We reserve unused capacity of the facilities. From timeunder our credit facility to time, the synthetic fuel operation supplements these base contracts, as opportunities arise, by entering into spot contracts to buy coal from these or other coal mines and sell synthetic fuel to different end users. The operation is slightly seasonal as the synthetic fuel is mainly burned to produce electricity and electricity use peaks in the summer in the markets served by the synthetic fuel operation. These long-term contracts can generally be cancelled by usrepay outstanding commercial paper borrowings in the event that the commercial paper market is not available to us for any reason when outstanding borrowings mature. We classify commercial paper as long-term debt based on our ability and intent to refinance it on a long-term basis.

During 2007, we choose not to operate the Facilities or that the synthetic fuel produced at the Facilities does not qualify for tax credits under Section 29issued $350 million of aggregate principal amount of 6.375 percent Series I Senior Notes due 2017. The offering of the Internal Revenue Code.Notes closed on June 25, 2007. We received net proceeds before expenses of approximately $346 million from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of the offering. We used these proceeds for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of commercial paper borrowings. Interest on these notes is paid on June 15 and December 15 of each year, and commenced on December 15, 2007. The notes will mature on June 15, 2017, and are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time under the terms provided in the form of note.

Also in 2007, we issued $400 million of aggregate principal amount of 5.625 percent Series J Senior Notes due 2013. The offering of the notes closed on October 19, 2007. We received net proceeds before expenses of approximately $396 million from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of the offering. We used these proceeds for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, stock repurchases, and the repayment of commercial paper borrowings. Interest on these notes is paid on February 15 and August 15 of each year, and commenced on February 15, 2008. The notes will mature on February 15, 2013, and are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time under the terms provided in the form of note.

Both the Series I Senior Notes and the Series J Senior Notes were issued under an indenture with The Bank of New York, successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee, dated as of November 16, 1998.

We are in compliance with covenants in our loan agreements, which require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and minimum shareholders’ equity and also include, among other things, limitations on additional indebtedness and the pledging of assets.

Aggregate debt maturities are: 2008-$175 million; 2009-$118 million; 2010-$51 million; 2011-$19 million; 2012-$360 million; and $2,242 million thereafter.

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was $115 million in 2007, $73 million in 2006, and $87 million in 2005.

Subsequent to year-end 2007, on January 15, 2008, we made a $94 million cash payment of principal and interest to retire, at maturity, all of our outstanding Series E Senior Notes.

 

13.SELF-INSURANCE RESERVE FOR LOSSES AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES

The synthetic fuel operation has entered into a long-term operationsactivity in the reserve for losses and maintenance agreement with an experienced manager of synthetic fuel facilities. This managerloss adjustment expenses is responsible for staffing the facilities, operating and maintaining the machinery and conducting routine maintenance on behalf of the synthetic fuel operation.summarized as follows:

 

($ in millions)  2007  2006 

Balance at beginning of year

  $271  $264 

Less: reinsurance recoverable

   (16)  (24)
         

Net balance at beginning of year

   255   240 
         

Incurred related to:

   

Current Year

   120   122 

Prior year

   (34)  (20)
         

Total incurred

   86   102 
         

Paid related to:

   

Current Year

   (31)  (37)

Prior year

   (50)  (50)
         

Total paid

   (81)  (87)
         

Net balance at end of year

   260   255 

Add: reinsurance recoverable

   14   16 
         

Balance at end of year

  $274  $271 
         

Finally, the synthetic fuel operation has entered into a long-term license

The provision for unpaid loss and binder purchase agreement with Headwaters Incorporated, which permits the operation to utilize a carboxylated polystyrene copolymer emulsion patentedloss adjustment expenses decreased by Headwaters$34 million and manufactured by Dow Chemical that is mixed with coal to produce a qualified synthetic fuel.

Our Investment

As a result of a put option associated with the June 21, 2003, sale of a 50 percent ownership interest$20 million in the synthetic fuel entities, we consolidated the two synthetic fuel joint ventures from that date through November 6, 2003. Effective November 7, 2003, because the put option was voided, we began accounting for the synthetic fuel joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. Beginning March 26, 2004,2007 and 2006, respectively, as a result of adopting FIN 46(R), we have again consolidated the synthetic fuel joint ventures, and we reflect our partner’s sharechanges in estimates from insured events of the operating losses as minority interest.

Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Placed-in-Service Challenge

In July 2004, IRS field auditors issuedprior years due to changes in underwriting experience and frequency and severity trends. The year-end 2007 self-insurance reserve of $274 million is comprised of a noticecurrent portion of proposed adjustment$92 million and laterlong-term portion of $182 million. The year-end 2006 self-insurance reserve of $271 million is comprised of a Summary Report to PacifiCorp, the previous ownercurrent portion of the Facilities, that included$87 million and a challenge to the placed-in-service dateslong-term portion of three of the four synthetic fuel facilities owned by one of our synthetic fuel joint ventures. One of the conditions to qualify for tax credits under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code is that the production facility must have been placed in service before July 1, 1998.

We strongly believe that all the facilities meet the placed-in-service requirement. Although we are engaged in discussions with the IRS and are confident this issue will be resolved in our favor and not result in a material charge to us, we cannot assure you as to the ultimate outcome of this matter. If ultimately resolved against us we could be prevented from realizing projected future tax credits and cause us to reverse previously utilized tax credits, requiring payment of substantial additional taxes. Since acquiring the plants, we have recognized approximately $435 million of tax credits from all four plants through December 31, 2004. The tax credits recognized through December 31, 2004, associated with the three facilities in question totaled approximately $330$184 million.

 

On October 6, 2004, we entered into amendment agreements with our synthetic fuel partner that result in a shift in the allocation of tax credits between us. On the synthetic fuel facility that is not being reviewed by the IRS, our partner increased its allocation of tax credits from approximately 50 percent to 90 percent through March 31, 2005, and pays a higher price per tax credit to us for that additional share of tax credits. With respect to the three synthetic fuel facilities under IRS review, our partner reduced its allocation of tax credits from approximately 50 percent to an average of roughly 5 percent through March 31, 2005. If the IRS’ placed-in-service challenge regarding the three facilities is not successfully resolved by March 31, 2005, our partner will have the right to return its ownership interest in those three facilities to us at that time. We will have the flexibility to continue to operate at current levels, reduce production and/or sell an interest to another party. If there is a successful resolution by March 31, 2005, our partner’s share of the tax credits from all four facilities will return to approximately 50 percent. In any event, on March 31, 2005, our share of the tax credits from the one facility not under review will return to approximately 50 percent.

8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Senior Living Services

During 2002, we completed the sale of 41 properties for $210 million and recorded an after-tax loss of $2 million. On December 30, 2002, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our senior living management business to Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”) and to sell nine senior living communities to CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CNL”) and recorded an after-tax charge of $131 million. We completed the sales to Sunrise and CNL, in addition to the related sale of a parcel of land to Sunrise in March 2003, for $266 million. We recorded after-tax gains of $19 million in 2003.

Also, on December 30, 2002, we purchased 14 senior living communities for approximately $15 million in cash, plus the assumption of $227 million in debt, from an unrelated owner. We had previously agreed to provide a form of credit enhancement on the outstanding debt related to these communities. Management approved and committed to a plan to sell these communities within 12 months. As part of that plan, on March 31, 2003, we acquired all of the subordinated credit-enhanced mortgage securities relating to the 14 communities in a transaction in which we issued $46 million of unsecured Marriott International, Inc. notes, due April 2004. In the 2003 third quarter, we sold the 14 communities to CNL for approximately $184 million. We provided a $92 million acquisition loan to CNL in connection with the sale. Sunrise currently operates, and will continue to operate, the 14 communities under long-term management agreements. We recorded a gain, net of taxes, of $1 million.

The operating results of our senior living segment are reported in discontinued operations during the years ended January 2, 2004, and January 3, 2003 and the remaining assets and liabilities were classified as assets held for sale and liabilities of businesses held for sale, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 3, 2003.

The following table provides additional income statement and balance sheet information relating to the Senior Living Services business:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Income Statement Summary

             

Sales

  $—    $184  $802 
   

  


 


Pre-tax income on operations

  $—    $11  $37 

Tax provision

   —     (4)  (14)
   

  


 


Income on operations, net of tax

  $—    $7  $23 
   

  


 


Pre-tax gain (loss) on disposal

  $—    $31  $(141)

Tax (provision) benefit

   —     (12)  10 
   

  


 


Gain (loss) on disposal, net of tax

  $—    $19  $(131)
   

  


 


Balance Sheet Summary

             

Property, plant and equipment

  $—    $—    $434 

Goodwill

   —     —     115 

Other assets

   —     —     54 

Liabilities

   —     —     317 

The tax benefit in 2002 of $10 million associated with the loss on disposal includes $45 million of additional taxes related to goodwill with no tax basis.

Distribution Services

In the third quarter of 2002, we completed a previously announced strategic review of our Distribution Services business and decided to exit that business. We completed that exit during the fourth quarter of 2002 through a combination of transferring certain facilities, closing other facilities and other suitable arrangements. In the year ended January 3, 2003, we recognized a pre-tax charge of $65 million in connection with the decision to exit this business. The charge includes (1) $15 million for payments to third parties to subsidize their assumption of, or in some cases to terminate, existing distribution or warehouse lease contracts; (2) $9 million for severance costs; (3) $10 million related to the adjusting of fixed assets to net realizable values; (4) $2 million related to inventory losses; (5) $15 million for losses on equipment leases; (6) $10 million for losses on warehouse leases; and (7) $4 million of other associated charges.

The following table provides additional income statement and balance sheet information relating to the Distribution Services business:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Income Statement Summary

             

Sales

  $—    $—    $1,376 
   


 

  


Pre-tax income (loss)

  $3  $—    $(24)

Tax (provision) benefit

   (1)  —     10 
   


 

  


Income (loss), net of tax

  $2  $—    $(14)
   


 

  


Pre-tax exit costs

  $—    $—    $(65)

Tax benefit

   —     —     25 
   


 

  


Exit costs, net of tax

  $—    $—    $(40)
   


 

  


Balance Sheet Summary

             

Property, plant and equipment

  $—    $—    $9 

Other assets

   —     —     21 

Liabilities

   —     —     49 

9. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

 

Contract acquisition costs

  $738  $730 

Accumulated amortization

   (225)  (204)
   


 


   $513  $526 
   


 


Goodwill

  $1,051  $1,051 

Accumulated amortization

   (128)  (128)
   


 


   $923  $923 
   


 


We capitalize costs incurred to acquire management, franchise, and license agreements that are both direct and incremental. We amortize these costs on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the agreements, typically 15 to 30 years. Amortization expense, including amounts related to discontinued operations, totaled $33 million in 2004, $28 million in 2003 and $42 million in 2002.

10. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

14.SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Eight hundred million shares of our Class A Common Stock, with a par value of $.01 per share, are authorized. Tenauthorized, and 10 million shares of preferred stock, without par value, are authorized, 200,000 shares have been issued, 100,000 of which were for the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and 100,000 of which were for Capped Convertible Preferred Stock.authorized. As of December 31, 2004,the 2007 fiscal year-end, there were no outstanding357.1 million shares of the ESOP stock,our Class A Common Stock outstanding and all theno shares of the Capped Convertible Preferred Stock sharesour preferred stock were retired and cancelled.

outstanding.

On March 27, 1998, our Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan under which one preferred stock purchase right was distributed for each share of our Class A Common Stock. Each right entitles the holder to buy 1/1000th of a share of a newly issued series of junior participating preferred stock of the Company at an exercise price of $175. The rights may not presently be exercised, but will be exercisable 10 days after a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of our Class A Common Stock or begins a tender or exchange for 30 percent or more of our Class A Common Stock. Shares owned by a person or group on March 27, 1998, and held continuously thereafter, are exempt for purposes of determining beneficial ownership under the rights plan. The rights are nonvoting and will expire on the tenth anniversary of the adoption of the shareholder rights planMarch 27, 2008, unless previously exercised or redeemed by us for $.01 each. If we are involved in a merger or certain other business combinations not approved by the Board of Directors prior to the expiration of the rights, each right entitles its holder, other than the acquiring person or group, to purchase common stock of either the Company or the acquirer having a value of twice the exercise price of the right. The Company does not plan to extend the shareholder rights plan or the rights beyond their March 27, 2008 expiration.

During the second quarter of 2000, we established an employee stock ownership plan solely to fund employer contributions to the profit sharing plan. The ESOP acquired 100,000 shares of special-purpose Company convertible preferred stock (ESOP Preferred Stock) for $1 billion. The ESOP Preferred Stock had a stated value and liquidation preference of $10,000 per share, paid a quarterly dividend of 1 percent of the stated value, and was convertible into our Class A Common Stock at any time based on the amount of our contributions to the ESOP and the market price of the common stock on the conversion date, subject to certain caps and a floor price. We held a note from the ESOP, which was eliminated upon consolidation, for the purchase price of the ESOP Preferred Stock. The shares of ESOP Preferred Stock were pledged as collateral for the repayment of the ESOP’s note, and those shares were released from the pledge as principal on the note was repaid. Shares of ESOP Preferred Stock released from the pledge were redeemable for cash based on the value of the common stock into which those shares could be converted. Principal and interest payments on the ESOP’s debt were forgiven periodically to fund contributions to the ESOP and release shares of ESOP Preferred Stock. Unearned ESOP shares were reflected within shareholders’ equity and amortized as shares of ESOP Preferred Stock were released and cash was allocated to employees’ accounts. The fair market value of the unearned ESOP shares at December 28, 2001, was $263 million. The last of the shares of ESOP Preferred Stock were released to fund contributions as of July 18, 2002, at which time the remainder of the principal and interest due on the ESOP’s note was forgiven. As of December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding shares of ESOP Preferred Stock.

Our accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive income of $51 million at year-end 2007 primarily consisted of gains totaling $9 million associated with available-for-sale securities and our accumulatedgains totaling $46 million associated with foreign currency translation adjustments, partially offset by net losses of $5 million associated with interest rate swap agreement cash flow hedges. Accumulated other comprehensive lossincome of $41$44 million at December 31, 2004,year-end 2006 primarily consisted of gains totaling $35 million associated with available-for-sale securities and January 2, 2004, respectively, consists primarily of fair value changes of certain financial instruments andgains totaling $12 million associated with foreign currency translation adjustments.

11. INCOME TAXES

 

Total deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004, were as follows:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

 

Deferred tax assets

  $834  $698 

Deferred tax liabilities

   (275)  (232)
   


 


Net deferred taxes

  $559  $466 
   


 


The tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carryforward that gives rise to a significant portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004, were as follows:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

 

Self-insurance

  $24  $35 

Employee benefits

   194   166 

Deferred income

   35   45 

Other reserves

   78   83 

Frequent guest program

   65   54 

Tax credits

   269   203 

Net operating loss carryforwards

   51   48 

Timeshare financing

   (22)  (8)

Property, equipment and intangible assets

   (123)  (127)

Other, net

   3   4 
   


 


Deferred taxes

   574   503 

Less: valuation allowance

   (15)  (37)
   


 


Net deferred taxes

  $559  $466 
   


 


At December 31, 2004, we had approximately $51 million of tax credits that expire through 2024, $218 million of tax credits that do not expire and $210 million of net operating losses, of which $139 million expire through 2023. The valuation allowance related to foreign net operating losses decreased as a result of our forecast of the realizability of the deferred tax asset, including the implementation of tax planning strategies.

We have made no provision for U.S. income taxes or additional foreign taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries ($402 million as of December 31, 2004) because we consider these earnings to be permanently invested. These earnings could become subject to additional taxes if remitted as dividends, loaned to us or a U.S. affiliate or if we sold our interests in the affiliates. We cannot practically estimate the amount of additional taxes that might be payable on the unremitted earnings.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“the Jobs Act”), enacted on October 22, 2004, provides for a temporary 85 percent dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings repatriated during a one-year period. The deduction would result in an approximate 5.25 percent federal tax rate on the repatriated earnings. To qualify for the deduction, the earnings must be reinvested in the United States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan established by a company’s chief executive officer and approved by the company’s board of directors. Certain other criteria in the Jobs Act must be satisfied as well. For Marriott, the one-year period during which the qualifying distributions can be made is fiscal 2005.

We are in the process of evaluating whether we will repatriate foreign earnings under the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act, and if so, the amount that will be repatriated. The range of reasonably possible amounts that we are considering for repatriation, which would be eligible for the temporary deduction, is zero to $500 million. We are awaiting the issuance of further regulatory guidance and passage of statutory technical corrections with respect to certain provisions in the Jobs Act prior to determining the amounts we will repatriate. We expect to determine the amounts and sources of foreign earnings to be repatriated, if any, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. The income tax effects of repatriation, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

We are not yet in a position to determine the impact of a qualifying repatriation, should we choose to make one, on our income tax expense for fiscal 2005, the amount of our indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings, or the amount of our deferred tax liability with respect to foreign earnings.

The benefit (provision) for income taxes consists of:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Current - Federal

  $(153) $5  $(129)

    - State

   (34)  (28)  (42)

    - Foreign

   (29)  (25)  (31)
   


 


 


    (216)  (48)  (202)

Deferred - Federal

   90   73   146 

      - State

   5   2   24 

      - Foreign

   21   16   —   
   


 


 


    116   91   170 
   


 


 


   $(100) $43  $(32)
   


 


 


The current tax provision does not reflect the benefits attributable to us relating to our ESOP of $70 million in 2002 or the exercise of employee stock options of $79 million in 2004, $40 million in 2003 and $25 million in 2002. Included in the above amounts are tax credits of $148 million in 2004, $214 million in 2003 and $164 million in 2002. The taxes applicable to other comprehensive income are not material.

A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory tax rate to our effective income tax rate for continuing operations follows:

   2004

  2003

  2002

 

U.S. statutory tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State income taxes, net of U.S. tax benefit

  2.9  3.8  4.0 

Minority interest

  2.4  —    —   

Reduction in deferred taxes

  2.2  —    —   

Change in valuation allowance

  (3.3) (3.2) —   

Foreign income

  (1.4) (1.1) (1.5)

Tax credits

  (22.6) (43.9) (34.8)

Goodwill

  —    —    3.6 

Other, net

  0.1  0.6  0.5 
   

 

 

Effective rate

  15.3% (8.8)% 6.8%
   

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, was $164 million in 2004, $144 million in 2003 and $107 million in 2002.

12. LEASES

We have summarized our future obligations under operating leases at December 31, 2004, below:

Fiscal Year


  ($ in millions)

2005

  $121

2006

   112

2007

   121

2008

   121

2009

   115

Thereafter

   989
   

Total minimum lease payments

  $1,579
   

Most leases have initial terms of up to 20 years and contain one or more renewal options, generally for five- or 10-year periods. These leases provide for minimum rentals and additional rentals based on our operations of the leased property. The total minimum lease payments above include $544 million, representing obligations of consolidated subsidiaries that are non-recourse to Marriott International, Inc.

Rent expense consists of:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Minimum rentals

  $216  $201  $222

Additional rentals

   93   68   75
   

  

  

   $309  $269  $297
   

  

  

The totals above exclude minimum rent expenses of $8 million and $34 million, and additional rent expenses of $1 million and $4 million, for 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to the discontinued Senior Living Services business. The totals also do not include minimum rent expenses of $42 million for 2002 related to the discontinued Distribution Services business.

13. LONG-TERM DEBT

Our long-term debt at December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004, consisted of the following:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

 

Senior Notes:

         

Series B, interest rate of 6.875%, maturing November 15, 2005

  $200  $200 

Series C, interest rate of 7.875%, maturing September 15, 2009

   299   299 

Series D, interest rate of 8.125%, maturing April 1, 2005

   275   275 

Series E, interest rate of 7.0%, maturing January 15, 2008

   293   293 

Other senior note, interest rate of 3.114% at January 2, 2004, matured April 1, 2004

   —     46 

Mortgage debt, average interest rate of 7.9%, maturing May 15, 2025

   174   178 

Other

   84   102 

LYONs

   —     62 
   


 


    1,325   1,455 

Less current portion

   (489)  (64)
   


 


   $836  $1,391 
   


 


As of December 31, 2004, all debt, other than mortgage debt and $10 million of other debt, is unsecured.

We have $500 million available for future offerings under “universal shelf” registration statements we have filed with the SEC.

We are party to two multicurrency revolving credit facilities that provide for aggregate borrowings of up to $2 billion; a $1.5 billion facility entered into in July 2001 that expires in July 2006; and a $500 million facility entered into in August 2003 that expires in August 2006. Borrowings under the facilities bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread, based on our public debt rating. Additionally, we pay annual fees on the facilities at a rate also based on our public debt rating.

We are in compliance with covenants in our loan agreements, that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and minimum shareholders’ equity, and also include, among other things, limitations on additional indebtedness and the pledging of assets.

Aggregate debt maturities are: 2005 - $489 million; 2006 - $15 million; 2007 - $12 million; 2008 - $306 million; 2009 - $311 million and $192 million thereafter.

Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations), net of amounts capitalized, was $105 million in 2004, $94 million in 2003 and $71 million in 2002.

On April 7, 2004, we sent notice to the holders of our Liquid Yield Option Notes due 2021 (“Notes”) that, subject to the terms of the indenture governing the Notes, we would purchase for cash, at the option of each holder, any Notes tendered by the Holder and not withdrawn on May 10, 2004, at a purchase price of $880.50 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity.

On May 11, 2004, Marriott repurchased all of the outstanding Notes for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $62 million.

14. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table illustrates the reconciliation of the earnings and number of shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share

            

Income from continuing operations

  $594  $476  $439

Weighted average shares outstanding

   226.6   232.5   240.3
   

  

  

Basic earnings per share from continuing operations

  $2.62  $2.05  $1.83
   

  

  

Computation of Diluted Earnings Per Share

            

Income from continuing operations

  $594  $476  $439

After-tax interest expense on convertible debt

   —     —     4
   

  

  

Income from continuing operations for diluted earnings per share

  $594  $476  $443
   

  

  

Weighted average shares outstanding

   226.6   232.5   240.3

Effect of dilutive securities

            

Employee stock option plan

   8.4   6.6   6.2

Deferred stock incentive plan

   4.3   4.8   5.2

Restricted stock units

   0.9   0.6   —  

Convertible debt

   0.3   0.9   2.9
   

  

  

Shares for diluted earnings per share

   240.5   245.4   254.6
   

  

  

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $2.47  $1.94  $1.74
   

  

  

We compute the effect of dilutive securities using the treasury stock method and average market prices during the period. We determine dilution based on earnings from continuing operations.

In accordance with FAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” we do not include the following stock options in our calculation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices are greater than the average market price for our Class A Common Stock for the applicable period:

(a) for the year ended December 31, 2004, no stock options;

(b) for the year ended January 2, 2004, 5.7 million stock options; and

(c) for the year ended January 3, 2003, 6.9 million stock options.

15. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS

We issue stock options, deferred shares, restricted shares and restricted stock units under our 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (the “Comprehensive Plan”). Under the Comprehensive Plan, we may award to participating employees (1) options to purchase our Class A Common Stock (Stock Option Program and Supplemental Executive Stock Option awards), (2) deferred shares of our Class A Common Stock, (3) restricted shares of our Class A Common Stock, and (4) restricted stock units of our Class A Common Stock. In addition, in 2004 we had an employee stock purchase plan (Stock Purchase Plan). In accordance with the provisions of Opinion No. 25 of the Accounting Principles Board, we recognize no compensation cost for the Stock Option Program, the Supplemental Executive Stock Option awards or the Stock Purchase Plan. We recognize compensation cost for the restricted stock, deferred shares and restricted stock unit awards.

Deferred shares granted to directors, officers and key employees under the Comprehensive Plan generally vest over 5 to 10 years in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. We granted six thousand deferred shares during 2004. Compensation cost, net of tax, recognized during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $4 million, $7 million and $6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2004, there was approximately $14 million in deferred compensation related to deferred shares.

        Restricted shares under the Comprehensive Plan are issued to officers and key employees and distributed over a number of years in annual installments, subject to certain prescribed conditions, including continued employment. We recognize compensation expense for the restricted shares over the restriction period equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance. We awarded no restricted shares under this plan during 2004. We recognized compensation cost, net of tax, of $4 million in 2004, $4 million in 2003 and $3 million in 2002. At December 31, 2004, there was approximately $10 million in deferred compensation related to restricted shares.

Restricted stock units under the Comprehensive Plan are issued to certain officers and key employees and vest over four years in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. We recognize compensation expense for the fair market value of the shares over the vesting period. Included in the 2004 and 2003 compensation costs is $23 million and $8 million, respectively, net of tax, related to the grant of approximately 1.6 million units and 1.9 million units, respectively, under the restricted stock unit plan, which was started in the first quarter of 2003. At December 31, 2004, there was approximately $84 million in deferred compensation related to unit grants. Under the unit plan, fixed grants will be awarded annually to certain employees.

Under the Stock Purchase Plan in 2004, eligible employees were able to purchase our Class A Common Stock through payroll deductions at the lower of the market value at the beginning or end of each plan year.

Employee stock options may be granted to officers and key employees at exercise prices equal to the market price of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Nonqualified options expire 10 years after the date of grant, except those issued from 1990 through 2000, which expire 15 years after the date of the grant. Most options under the Stock Option Program are exercisable in cumulative installments of one quarter at the end of each of the first four years following the date of grant. In February 1997, 2.2 million Supplemental Executive Stock Option awards were awarded to certain of our officers. The options vest after eight years but could vest earlier if our stock price meets certain performance criteria. None of these options, which have an exercise price of $25, were exercised during 2004, 2003 or 2002, and 1.9 million remained outstanding at December 31, 2004.

For the purposes of the disclosures required by FAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the fair value of each option granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $17, $11 and $14, respectively. We estimated the fair value of each option granted on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method, using the assumptions noted in the following table:

   2004

  2003

  2002

 

Annual dividends

  $0.32  $0.30  $0.28 

Expected volatility

   31%  32%  32%

Risk-free interest rate

   3.7%  3.5%  3.6%

Expected life (in years)

   7   7   7 

Pro forma compensation cost for the Stock Option Program, the Supplemental Executive Stock Option awards and employee purchases pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan subsequent to December 30, 1994, would reduce our net income as described in the “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” as required by FAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 123.”

A summary of our Stock Option Program activity during 2004, 2003 and 2002 is presented below:

   Number of
Options
(in millions)


  

Weighted

Average Exercise

Price


Outstanding at December 29, 2001

  38.3  $29

Granted during the year

  1.4   37

Exercised during the year

  (1.6)  22

Forfeited during the year

  (0.6)  37
   

   

Outstanding at January 3, 2003

  37.5   29

Granted during the year

  4.0   30

Exercised during the year

  (4.6)  22

Forfeited during the year

  (0.7)  37
   

   

Outstanding at January 2, 2004

  36.2   29

Granted during the year

  1.8   46

Exercised during the year

  (7.3)  30

Forfeited during the year

  (0.3)  38
   

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2004

  30.4  $31
   

   

There were 22.0 million, 25.1 million and 24.9 million exercisable options under the Stock Option Program at December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004, and January 3, 2003, respectively, with weighted average exercise prices of $29, $28 and $25, respectively.

At December 31, 2004, 47.0 million shares were reserved under the Comprehensive Plan (including 32.3 million shares under the Stock Option Program and Supplemental Executive Stock Option awards), and 5.5 million shares were reserved under the Stock Purchase Plan.

Stock options issued under the Stock Option Program outstanding at December 31, 2004, were as follows:

   Outstanding

  Exercisable

Range of

Exercise

Prices


  Number of
Options
(in millions)


  Weighted
Average
Remaining Life
(in Years)


  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


  Number of
Options
(in millions)


  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price


$3    to    5

  0.4  1  $3  0.4  $3

  6    to    9

  1.2  3   7  1.2   7

10    to  15

  1.6  5   13  1.6   13

16    to  24

  1.1  6   17  1.1   17

25    to  37

  18.7  8   31  13.8   31

38    to  49

  7.4  8   45  3.9   44
   
         
    

$3    to  49

  30.4  8  $31  22.0  $29
   
         
    

16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

15.FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We believe that the fair values of current assets and current liabilities approximate their reported carrying amounts. The fair values of noncurrentnon-current financial assets, liabilities, and derivatives are shown below.in the following table.

 

   2004

  2003

 

($ in millions)

 

  Carrying
Amount


  Fair
Value


  Carrying
Amount


  

Fair

Value


 

Notes and other long-term assets

  $1,702  $1,770  $1,740  $1,778 
   

  

  


 


Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities

  $848  $875  $1,373  $1,487 
   

  

  


 


Derivative instruments

  $—    $—    $(1) $(1)
   

  

  


 


($ in millions)  At Year-end 2007  At Year-end 2006 
   Carrying
Amount
  Fair
Value
  Carrying
Amount
  Fair
Value
 

Notes and other long-term assets

  $996  $1,002  $993  $996 
                 

Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities

  $(2,967) $(3,050) $(1,816) $(1,847)
                 

Derivative instruments

  $(7) $(7) $6  $6 
                 

We value notes and other receivables based on the expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates. We determine valuations for long-term debt and other long-term liabilities based on quoted market prices or expected future payments discounted at risk-adjusted rates.

 

16.17. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

During 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage the volatility of the U.S. Treasury component of the interest rate risk associated with the forecasted issuance of our Series I and Series J Senior Notes. During 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage the volatility of the U.S. Treasury component of the interest rate risk associated with the forecasted issuance of our Series H Notes. During 2005, we entered into two similar instruments in conjunction with the forecasted issuance of our Series F Notes and the exchange of our Series C and Series E Senior Notes for new Series G Notes. All five swaps were designated as cash

flow hedges under FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS No. 133”) and were terminated upon pricing of the notes. All five swaps were highly effective in offsetting fluctuations in the U.S. Treasury component. Thus, there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings during 2007, 2006, or 2005. The net losses for these swaps were $4 million in 2007 associated with the Series I and Series J Senior Notes, zero in 2006 associated with the Series H Senior Notes, and $2 million in 2005 associated with the Series F and Series G Senior Notes were recorded in other comprehensive income and are being amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the life of the notes.

At year-end 2007, we had four outstanding interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk associated with the residual interests we retain in conjunction with our timeshare note sales. Historically, we were required by purchasers and/or rating agencies to utilize interest rate swaps to protect the excess spread within our sold note pools. The aggregate notional amount of the swaps is $157 million, and they expire through 2022. These swaps are not accounted for as hedges under FAS No. 133. The fair value of the swaps was a net asset of $2 million at year-end 2007 and $5 million at year-end 2006. For the outstanding interest rate swaps, we recorded a $3 million net loss during 2007, a $1 million net loss during 2006 and a $2 million net gain during 2005.

During 2007, 2006, and 2005, we entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with forecasted timeshare note sales. During 2007, five swaps were designated as cash flow hedges under FAS No. 133 and were highly effective in offsetting interest rate fluctuations. The amount of the ineffectiveness was immaterial. In 2007, we terminated two of those five swaps and recognized no gain or loss from the sales of Timeshare segment notes receivable. The aggregate notional amount of the remaining three swaps is $238 million at year-end 2007, and they expire through 2012. The fair value of the remaining three swaps was a net liability of $7 million at year-end 2007. For the outstanding interest rate swaps, we recorded in 2007 a $7 million net loss in other comprehensive income. During 2006, two swaps (the “2006 swaps”) were designated as cash flow hedges under FAS No. 133 and were highly effective in offsetting interest rate fluctuations. In 2006, we terminated the 2006 swaps and recognized a net gain of $1 million in the gains from the sales of Timeshare segment notes receivable. During 2005, one swap was designated as a cash flow hedge under FAS No. 133 and was highly effective in offsetting interest rate fluctuations. The amount of the ineffectiveness was immaterial and upon termination we recognized a net gain of $2 million in gains from the sales of Timeshare segment notes receivable. The second swap entered into in 2005 did not qualify for hedge accounting. The non-qualifying swap resulted in a loss of $3 million during 2005, which was also recognized in gains from the sales of Timeshare segment notes receivable.

During 2007, 2006, and 2005, we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the foreign currency exposure related to certain monetary assets. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amount of the contracts was $133 million at year-end 2007. The forward exchange contracts do not qualify as hedges in accordance with FAS No. 133. The fair value of the forward contracts was an asset of $2 million at year-end 2007 and zero at year-end 2006. We recorded a $10 million loss during 2007, a $34 million loss during 2006, and a $26 million gain in 2005, relating to these forward foreign exchange contracts. The net gains and losses for all years were recorded as general, administrative, and other expense and were offset by income and losses recorded from translating the related monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies into U.S. dollars.

During 2007, 2006, and 2005, we entered into foreign exchange option contracts to hedge the potential volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with variations in foreign exchange rates. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the contracts was $86 million at year-end 2007. These contracts have terms of less than one year ended January 2, 2004,and are classified as cash flow hedges. Changes in their fair values are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The fair value of the option contracts was approximately $1 million at year-end 2007 and zero at year-end 2006. We recorded an immaterial amount in general, administrative, and other expense due to changes in the time value of these contracts, which is excluded from the assessment of our hedge effectiveness. The hedges were highly effective and there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings for 2007, 2006, and 2005. As of year-end 2007, the deferred gains or losses on existing contracts accumulated in other comprehensive income that we expect to reclassify into earnings over the next year were zero.

During 2007, we entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge forecasted transactions for contracts denominated in foreign currencies. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the contracts was $58 million at year-end 2007. These contracts have terms of less than three years and are classified as cash flow hedges. Changes in their fair value are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The fair value of the forward contracts was zero at year-end 2007. We recorded an immaterial amount in general, administrative, and other expense due to changes in the time value of these contracts, which is excluded from the assessment of our hedge effectiveness. The hedges were highly effective and there was no gain or loss reported in 2007. As of year-end 2007, the deferred gains or losses on existing contracts accumulated in other comprehensive income that we expect to reclassify into earnings over the next three years were $1 million.

During 2007, 2006, and 2005, we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage currency exchange rate volatility associated with certain investments in foreign operations. The contracts offset the gains and losses associated with translation adjustments for various investments in foreign operations. One contract was designated as a hedge in the net investment of a foreign operation under FAS No. 133 at year-end 2006. The hedge was highly effective and resulted in a $1 million net loss for 2007, no net gain or loss for 2006, and a $1 million net loss for 2005 in the foreign currency translation adjustment section of other comprehensive income. Certain contracts did not qualify as hedges under FAS No. 133 and resulted in no gain or loss for 2007, a loss of $17 million for 2006, and a gain of $3 million for 2005, impacting our general, administrative, and other expenses. No contracts remained at year-end 2007. One contract remained at year-end 2006, which had an aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amount of $43 million and a fair value of zero. Contracts remaining at year-end 2005 had an aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amount of $229 million and a fair value of approximately zero.

During 2007 and 2006, in response to high oil prices and uncertainty surrounding the potential phase out of tax credits, we entered into oil price hedges in conjunction with our synthetic fuel operation. These hedges do not qualify as cash flow hedges under FAS No. 133. Therefore, changes in the fair values of these instruments are marked-to-market through interest income at each reporting period. Correspondingly, we recorded a net loss of $8 million during 2007 and a net loss of $2 million during 2006. At year-end 2007, hedges with a total fair value of $4 million remained outstanding. At year-end 2006, hedges with a total fair value of $5 million remained outstanding.

During 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement under which we receive a floating rate of interest and pay a fixed rate of interest. The swap modifies our interest rate exposure by effectively converting a note receivable with a fixed rate to a floating rate. The aggregate notional amount of the swap is $92 million and it matures in 2010. The swap is classified as a fair value hedge under FAS No. 133 and the change in the fair value of the swap, as well as the change in the fair value of the underlying note receivable, is recognized in interest income. The fair value of the swap was a $2 million liability of approximately $3at year-end 2007, and a $1 million asset at December 31, 2004,year-end 2006 and January 2, 2004.2005. The hedge is highly effective and, therefore, no net gain or loss was reported in earnings during the years ended December 31, 2004,2007, 2006, and January 2, 2004.2005.

 

At December 31, 2004, we had six outstanding interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk associated with the residual interests we retain in conjunction with our timeshare note sales. We are required by purchasers and/or rating agencies to utilize interest rate swaps to protect the excess spread within our sold note pools. The aggregate notional amount of the swaps is $535 million, and they expire through 2022. These swaps are not accounted for as hedges under FAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The fair value of the swaps is a net asset of approximately $3 million at December 31, 2004, a net asset of approximately $1 million at January 2, 2004, and a net liability of $2 million at January 3, 2003. We recorded a $2 million net gain, $3 million net gain and $21 million net loss during the years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004 and January 3, 2003, respectively. These expenses were largely offset by income resulting from the change in fair value of the retained interests and note sale gains in response to changes in interest rates.

During the years ended December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004, we entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with forecasted timeshare note sales. These swaps were not accounted for as hedges under FAS No. 133. The swaps were terminated upon the sale of the notes and resulted in a gain of $2 million during the year ended December 31, 2004 and a loss of $4 million during the year ended January 2, 2004. These amounts were largely offset by changes in the note sale gains and losses.

During the years ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004, we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the foreign currency exposure related to certain monetary assets denominated in pounds sterling. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amount of the contracts is $36 million at December 31, 2004. The forward exchange contracts are not accounted for as hedges in accordance with FAS No. 133. The fair value of the forward contracts is approximately zero at December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004. We recorded a $3 million and $2 million net loss relating to these forward foreign exchange contracts for the years ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004, respectively. The net losses for both years were offset by income recorded from translating the related monetary assets denominated in pounds sterling into U.S. dollars.

During fiscal years 2004 and 2003, we entered into foreign exchange option and forward contracts to hedge the potential volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with variations in foreign exchange rates. The aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the contracts is $36 million at December 31, 2004. These contracts have terms of less than a year and are classified as cash flow hedges. Changes in their fair values are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The fair value of the forward contracts is approximately zero and $1 million at December 31, 2004, and January 2, 2004, respectively. During 2004, it was determined that certain derivatives were no longer effective in offsetting the hedged item. Thus, cash flow hedge accounting treatment was discontinued and the ineffective contracts resulted in a loss of $1 million, which was reported in earnings for fiscal year 2004. The remaining hedges were highly effective and there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003. As of December 31, 2004, there were no deferred gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income that we expect to reclassify into earnings over the next 12 months.

18. CONTINGENCIES

17.CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees

We issue guarantees to certain lenders and hotel owners primarily to obtain long-term management contracts. The guarantees generally have a stated maximum amount of funding and a term of five years or less.three to 10 years. The terms of guarantees to lenders generally require us to fund if cash flows from hotel operations are inadequate to cover annual debt service or to repay the loan at the end of the term. The terms of the guarantees to hotel owners generally require us to fund if the hotels do not attain specified levels of operating profit.

Guarantee fundings to lenders and hotel owners are generally recoverable as loans repayable to us out of future hotel cash flows and/or proceeds from the sale of hotels. We also enter into project completion guarantees with certain lenders in conjunction with hotels and timeshare unitsTimeshare segment properties that we or our joint venture partners are building.

The maximum potential amount of future fundings for guarantees where we are the primary obligor and the carrying amount of the liability for expected future fundings at December 31, 2004,year-end 2007 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

      

Guarantee Type


  Maximum
Potential Amount
of Future Fundings


  Liability for Future
Fundings at
December 31, 2004


Debt service

  $227  $4

Operating profit

   276   14

Project completion

   52   —  

Other

   46   5
   

  

Total guarantees where Marriott International is the primary obligor

  $601  $23
   

  

 

($ in millions)

 

Guarantee Type

  Maximum Potential
Amount of Future
Fundings
  Liability for Future
Fundings at
Year-end 2007

Debt service

  $35  $1

Operating profit

   204   31

Other

   76   7
        

Total guarantees where we are the primary obligor

  $315  $39
        

Our guarantees of $601$315 million listed abovein the preceding table include $91$41 million forof operating profit guarantees that will not be in effect until the underlying hotelsproperties open and we begin to manageoperate the properties.

The $91guarantees of $315 million in the preceding table do not include $245 million of guarantees that expire in the years 2011 through 2013, related to Senior Living Services lease obligations and lifecare bonds for which we are secondarily liable. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”) is the primary obligor of the leases and a portion of the lifecare bonds, and CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CNL”), which subsequently merged with Health Care Property Investors, Inc., is the primary obligor of the remainder of the lifecare bonds. Prior to our sale of the Senior Living Services business in 2003, these preexisting guarantees were guarantees by us of obligations of consolidated Senior Living Services subsidiaries. Sunrise and CNL have indemnified us for any guarantee fundings we may be called on to make in connection with these lease obligations and lifecare bonds. We do not expect to fund under the guarantees.

The table also does not include lease obligations for which we became secondarily liable when we acquired the Renaissance Hotel Group N.V. in effect is comprised1997, consisting of $72annual rent payments of approximately $7 million and total remaining rent payments through the initial term of operating profitapproximately $77 million. Most of these obligations expire at the end of the 2023 calendar year. CTF had originally made available €35 million in cash collateral in the event that we are required to fund under such guarantees and $19(approximately €7 million of debt service guarantees. Guarantee fundings to lenders and hotel owners are generally recoverable as loans and are generally repayable to us out of future hotel cash flows and/or proceeds[$11 million] remained at year-end 2007). As CTF obtains releases from the salelandlords and these hotels exit the system, our contingent liability exposure of hotels.approximately $77 million will decline. Since the time we assumed these guarantees, we have not funded any amounts and we do not expect to fund any amounts under these guarantees in the future.

Furthermore, in addition to the guarantees noted in the preceding table , we have provided a project completion guarantee to a lender for a project with an estimated aggregate total cost of $586 million. Payments for cost overruns for this project will be satisfied by the joint venture via contributions from the partners, and we are liable on a several basis with our partners in an amount equal to our pro rata ownership in the joint venture, which is 34 percent. We do not expect to fund under the guarantee. We have also provided a project completion guarantee to another lender for a project with an estimated aggregate total cost of $80 million. Payments for cost overruns for this project will be satisfied by the joint venture via contributions from the partners, and we are liable on a several basis with our partners in an amount equal to our pro rata ownership in the joint venture, which is 25 percent. We do not expect to fund under this guarantee. The carrying value of the liabilities associated with these two project completion guarantees is $7 million.

In addition to the guarantees noted above,described in the preceding paragraphs, in conjunction with financing obtained for specific projects or properties owned by joint ventures in which we are a party, we may provide industry standard indemnifications to the lender for loss, liability, or damage occurring as a result of the actions of the other joint venture owner or our own actions, in each case limited to the lesser of (i) our ownership interest in the entity or (ii) the actual loss, liability or damage occurring as a result of our actions.

The guarantees above do not include $349 million related to Senior Living Services lease obligations and lifecare bonds for which we are secondarily liable. Sunrise is the primary obligor of the leases and a portion of the lifecare bonds, and CNL is the primary obligor of the remainder of the lifecare bonds. Prior to the sale of the Senior Living Services business at the end of the first quarter of 2003, these pre-existing guarantees were guarantees by the Company of obligations of consolidated Senior Living Services subsidiaries. Sunrise and CNL have indemnified us for any guarantee fundings we may be called on to make in connection with these lease obligations and lifecare bonds. We do not expect to fund under the guarantees.

The guarantees above also do not include lease obligations for which we became secondarily liable when we acquired the Renaissance Hotel Group N.V. in 1997, consisting of annual rent payments of approximately $63 million and total remaining rent payments through the initial term plus available extensions of approximately $1.56 billion. We are also secondarily obligated for real estate taxes and other charges associated with the leases. Third parties have severally indemnified us for all payments we may be required to make in connection with these obligations. Since we assumed these guarantees, we have not funded any amounts, and we do not expect to fund any amounts under these guarantees in the future.

Commitments and Letters of Credit

In addition to the guarantees noted above,previously, as of December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, we had extended approximately $42$4 million of loan commitments to owners of lodging properties, under which we expect to fund approximately $12$2 million by December 30, 2005, and $14 million over the followingwithin one year. We do not expect to fund the remaining $16$2 million of commitments, which expire after five years.

At year-end 2007, we also have commitments to invest up to $44 million of equity for minority interests in partnerships that plan to purchase North American full-service and limited-service properties or purchase or develop hotel anchored mixed-use real estate projects, which expire as follows: $14 million withinin one yearto two years; and $2$30 million afterin three to five years. At December 31, 2004,As of year-end 2007, we also have commitmentsa commitment to invest $37up to $25 million in a joint venture of equity forwhich we have funded $12 million and have $13 million remaining that we expect to fund within one year. As of year-end 2007, we also had a minority interestcommitment to invest up to $29 million (€20 million) in two partnerships that plana joint venture in which we are an investor. We currently do not expect to purchase both full-service and select-service hotels in the U.S.

fund under this commitment.

At December 31, 2004,year-end 2007, we also had $96 million of letters of credit outstanding on our behalf, the majority of which related to our self-insurance programs. Surety bonds issued on our behalf as of December 31, 2004at year-end 2007, totaled $486$468 million, the majority of which were requested by federal, state or local governments related to our timeshare and lodging operations, including our Timeshare segment and self-insurance programs.

Synthetic Fuel

The tax credits available under the Internal Revenue Code for the production and sale of synthetic fuels were established by Congress to encourage the development of alternative domestic energy sources. Congress deemed that the incentives provided by the tax credits would not be necessary if the price of oil increased beyond certain thresholds as prices would then provide a more natural market for these alternative fuels. As a result, the tax credits available under the Internal Revenue Code for the production and sale of synthetic fuel in any given calendar year are phased out if the Reference Price of a barrel of oil for that year falls within a specified range. The Reference Price of a barrel of oil is an estimate of the annual average wellhead price per barrel of domestic crude oil and is determined for each calendar year by the Secretary of the Treasury by April 1 of the following year. In 2005 and 2006, the Reference Price was roughly equal to 89 percent and 90 percent, respectively, of the average price in those years of the benchmark NYMEX futures contract for a barrel of light, sweet crude oil. The price range within which the credit is phased out was set in 1980 and is adjusted annually for inflation. In 2006, the Reference Price phase-out range was $55.06 to $69.12. Because the Reference Price of a barrel of oil for 2006 was within that range, at $59.68, there was a 33 percent reduction of the tax credits available for synthetic fuel produced and sold in 2006.

Assuming a 2.5 percent inflation adjustment factor for 2007, and assuming the ratio of the Reference Price to the average price of the benchmark NYMEX futures contract remains the same for November and December 2007 as it has been in the five preceding months, we currently estimate that the tax credits available for production and sale of synthetic fuel in 2007 would begin to be phased out if the average price of the benchmark NYMEX futures contract in 2007 exceeds approximately $62 and would be fully phased out if the average price of the benchmark NYMEX futures contract in 2007 exceeds approximately $78. For the year ended December 28, 2007, our results reflect a provision for an estimated 70.71 percent tax credit phase-out as a result of high oil prices. The average price of the benchmark NYMEX futures contract for 2007, through December 31, 2007, was approximately $72.41.

Late in 2006 and early in 2007, we entered into hedge agreements to minimize operating losses that could occur if more than a majority of the tax credits is phased out in 2007.

See Footnote No. 2, “Discontinued Operations,” earlier in this report, for additional information related to the synthetic fuel operations, including information related to the cessation of synthetic fuel production permanently in November 2007.

Litigation and ArbitrationInvestment in Leveraged Lease

CTF/HPI arbitration and litigation. On April 8, 2002,Historically, we initiatedhad a $23 million investment in an arbitration proceeding against CTF Hotel Holdings,aircraft leveraged lease with Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“CTF”Delta”) which we acquired in 1994. The gross investment was comprised of rentals receivable and its affiliate,the residual value of the aircraft offset by unearned income. On September 14, 2005, Delta filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and informed us that it wished to restructure the lease. As a result, our investment was impaired and we had recorded pretax charges of approximately $18 million through 2006. We recorded an additional $5 million loss related to this investment in fiscal 2007. We have no remaining exposure related to this historical investment.

18.LEASES

We have summarized our future obligations under operating leases at year-end 2007, below:

($ in millions)

 

Fiscal Year

  Minimum Lease
Payments

2008

  $142

2009

   147

2010

   139

2011

   126

2012

   123

Thereafter

   1,156
    

Total minimum lease payments where we are the primary obligor

  $1,833
    

Most leases have initial terms of up to 20 years and contain one or more renewal options, generally for five- or 10-year periods. These leases provide for minimum rentals and additional rentals based on our operations of the leased property. The total minimum lease payments above include $439 million, representing obligations of consolidated subsidiaries that are non-recourse to Marriott International, Inc.

As discussed in Footnote No. 8, “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” we became secondarily liable for annual rent payments for certain hotels when we acquired the Renaissance Hotel Property Investments (B.V.I.) Ltd. (“HPI”),Group N.V. in 1997. At year-end 2007, we continued to manage 14 of these hotels under long-term management agreements; however, due to certain provisions in the management agreements, we account for these contracts as operating leases. CTF placed funds into trust accounts to cover possible shortfalls in cash flow necessary to meet rent payments under these leases. In turn, we released CTF affiliates from their guarantees in connection with these leases. Approximately $38 million remained in these trust accounts at year-end 2007. Minimum lease payments relating to these leases, which are not reflected in the $1,833 million in the preceding table are as follows: $30 million in each of 2008, 2009, and 2010; $26 million in 2011; $17 million in 2012; and $33 million thereafter, for a dispute over procurement and other issuestotal of $166 million.

The composition of rent expense for certain Renaissance hotels and resorts that we manage for CTF and HPI. On April 12, 2002, CTF filed a lawsuitthe last three fiscal years associated with operating leases is detailed in U.S. District Court in Delaware against us and Avendra LLC, alleging that, in connection with procurement at 20 of those hotels, we engaged in improper acts of self-dealing, and claiming breach of fiduciary, contractual and other duties; fraud; misrepresentation; and violations of the RICO and the Robinson-Patman Acts. CTF seeks various remedies, including a stay of the arbitration proceedings against CTF and unspecified actual, treble and punitive damages. The district court enjoined the arbitration with respect to CTF, but granted our request to stay the court proceedings pending the resolution of the arbitration with respect to HPI. Both parties have appealed that ruling. The arbitration panel hearing on the matter began on April 6, 2004 and concluded on June 11, 2004. Briefing has been concluded.following table:

 

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005

Minimum rentals

  $272  $253  $211

Additional rentals

   100   109   109
            
  $372  $362  $320
            

In a decision dated August 23, 2004 a panel ofWe have summarized our future obligations under capital leases at year-end 2007, in the Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s stay of the arbitration as to CTF but reversed the district court’s stay of the trial. On September 7, 2004, we filed with the Third Circuit a petition for rehearing en banc in which we asked the court to reconsider its decision vacating the stay of the trial. The petition was denied on September 24, 2004. No scheduling order has been entered by the district court.following table:

 

($ in millions)    

Fiscal Year

  Minimum Lease
Payments
 

2008

  $1 

2009

   1 

2010

   1 

2011

   1 

2012

   1 

Thereafter

   7 
     

Total minimum lease payments

   12 

Less: Amount representing interest

   (5)
     

Present value of net minimum lease payments

  $7 
     

We believeThe accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets for year-end 2007, included $7 million in the “Long-term debt” caption that CTF’s and HPI’s claims against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend against them. However, we cannot assure you as torepresented the outcomepresent value of the arbitration or the related litigation; nor can we currently estimate the range of any potential losses to the Company.net minimum lease payments associated with capital leases.

 

19.BUSINESS SEGMENTS

19. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

We are a diversified hospitality company with operations in five business segments:segments:

 

  

North American Full-Service Lodging, which includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, The Ritz-Carlton,Marriott Conference Centers, JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Marriott Conference Centers, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts;Renaissance ClubSport properties located in the continental United States and Canada;

 

  

Select-ServiceNorth American Limited-Service Lodging, which includes Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, SpringHill Suites, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, and SpringHill Suites;Marriott ExecuStay properties located in the continental United States and Canada;

 

  

Extended-StayInternational Lodging, which includes Marriott Hotels & Resorts, JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites, Marriott ExecuStayRamada International, and Marriott Executive Apartments;Apartments properties located outside the continental United States and Canada;

 

  

Luxury Lodging, which includes The Ritz-Carlton and Bulgari Hotels & Resorts properties worldwide; and

Timeshare, which includes the development, marketing, operation, and ownershipsale of timeshare, fractional ownership, and residential properties worldwide under the Marriott Vacation Club, International, The Ritz-Carlton Club, Marriott Grand Residence ClubResidences by Marriott, and Horizons by Marriott Vacation Club International; andClub.

Synthetic Fuel, which includes our interest in the operation of coal-based synthetic fuel production facilities.

In addition to the segments above, in 20022007 we exited the synthetic fuel business, which was formerly a separate segment but which we now report under discontinued operations.

In addition to the brands noted above, in 2007 we announced our intentnew brand of family-friendly resorts and spas, “Nickelodeon Resorts by Marriott” and a new brand of lifestyle boutique hotels, “Edition.” At year-end 2007, no properties were yet open under either brand.

In 2006, we analyzed our internal reporting process and implemented changes in the fourth quarter that were designed to sell,improve efficiency and, subsequently did sell,as part of this process, we evaluated the impact on segment reporting. Accordingly, we now report five operating segments, and no longer allocate indirect administrative expenses to our Senior Living Services businesssegments. We reflect this revised segment reporting throughout this report for all periods presented, and exited our Distribution Services business segment.

present historical figures in a manner that is consistent with the revised segment reporting. See also the Form 8-K that we filed on March 19, 2007, furnishing quarterly Revenues and Income from Continuing Operations for each of 2006 and 2005 in the new segment format.

We evaluate the performance of our segments based primarily on the results of the segment without allocating corporate expenses, interest expense, or indirect general, administrative, and interest income.other expenses. With the exception of the Synthetic FuelTimeshare segment, we do not allocate interest income taxes to our segments. The synthetic fuel operation generated a tax benefit and credits of $165 million, $245 million and $208 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2004, January 2, 2004, and January 3, 2003, from our synthetic fuel joint venture. As timeshareBecause note sales are an integral part of the timeshare business,Timeshare segment, we include timeshare note sale gains in our timeshareTimeshare segment results. We include interest income associated with Timeshare segment notes in our Timeshare segment results and webecause financing sales are an integral part of that segment’s business. We also allocate other gains or losses as well as equity in earnings (losses)or losses from our joint ventures and divisional general, administrative, and other expenses to each of our segments.

“Other unallocated corporate” represents that portion of our revenues, general, administrative, and other expenses, equity in earnings or losses, and other gains or losses that are not allocable to our segments.

We have aggregatedaggregate the brands and businesses presented within each of our North American Full-Service, North American Limited-Service, International, Luxury, and Timeshare segments considering their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, distribution channels, and the regulatory business environment of the brands and operations within each segment.segment and our organizational and management reporting structure.

Revenues

             

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Full-Service

  $6,611  $5,876  $5,508 

Select-Service

   1,118   1,000   967 

Extended-Stay

   547   557   600 

Timeshare

   1,502   1,279   1,147 
   


 


 


Total lodging

   9,778   8,712   8,222 

Synthetic Fuel

   321   302   193 
   


 


 


   $10,099  $9,014  $8,415 
   


 


 


Income from Continuing Operations

             

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Full-Service

  $426  $407  $397 

Select-Service

   140   99   130 

Extended-Stay

   66   47   (3)

Timeshare

   203   149   183 
   


 


 


Total lodging financial results

   835   702   707 

Synthetic Fuel (after-tax)

   107   96   74 

Unallocated corporate expenses

   (138)  (132)  (126)

Interest income, provision for loan losses and interest expense

   55   12   24 

Income taxes (excluding Synthetic Fuel)

   (265)  (202)  (240)
   


 


 


   $594  $476  $439 
   


 


 


Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Equity Method Investees             

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Full-Service

  $10  $8  $5 

Select-Service

   (17)  (22)  (8)

Timeshare

   (7)  (4)  (2)

Synthetic Fuel

   (28)  10   —   

Corporate

   —     1   (1)
   


 


 


   $(42) $(7) $(6)
   


 


 


Depreciation and Amortization            

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Full-Service

  $64  $54  $54

Select-Service

   12   10   9

Extended-Stay

   9   10   10

Timeshare

   49   49   38
   

  

  

Total Lodging

   134   123   111

Corporate

   24   29   31

Synthetic Fuel

   8   8   8

Discontinued operations

   —     —     37
   

  

  

   $166  $160  $187
   

  

  

Assets            

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Full-Service

  $3,230  $3,436  $3,423

Select-Service

   817   833   771

Extended-Stay

   241   286   274

Timeshare

   2,321   2,350   2,225
   

  

  

Total Lodging

   6,609   6,905   6,693

Corporate

   1,943   1,189   911

Synthetic Fuel

   116   83   59

Discontinued operations

   —     —     633
   

  

  

   $8,668  $8,177  $8,296
   

  

  

Equity Method Investments            

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Full-Service

  $120  $310  $327

Select-Service

   77   95   114

Timeshare

   31   22   13
   

  

  

Total Lodging

   228   427   454

Corporate

   21   41   21
   

  

  

   $249  $468  $475
   

  

  

Goodwill

            

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Full-Service

  $851  $851  $851

Select-Service

   —     —     —  

Extended-Stay

   72   72   72

Timeshare

   —     —     —  
   

  

  

Total Lodging

  $923  $923  $923
   

  

  

Capital ExpendituresRevenues

 

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

Full-Service

  $95  $93  $138

Select-Service

   16   38   23

Extended-Stay

   1   3   39

Timeshare

   38   45   36
   

  

  

Total lodging

   150   179   236

Corporate

   31   16   20

Synthetic Fuel

   —     —     7

Discontinued operations

   —     15   29
   

  

  

   $181  $210  $292
   

  

  

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $5,476  $5,196  $5,116 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   2,198   2,060   1,886 

International Segment

   1,594   1,411   1,017 

Luxury Segment

   1,576   1,423   1,333 

Timeshare Segment

   2,065   1,840   1,721 
             

Total segment revenues

   12,909   11,930   11,073 

Other unallocated corporate

   81   65   56 
             
  $12,990  $11,995  $11,129 
             
Income from Continuing Operations    
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $478  $455  $349 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   461   380   303 

International Segment

   271   237   133 

Luxury Segment

   72   63   45 

Timeshare Segment

   306   280   271 
             

Total segment financial results

   1,588   1,415   1,101 

Other unallocated corporate

   (287)  (251)  (219)

Interest income, provision for loan losses, and interest expense

   (163)  (72)  (55)

Income taxes

   (441)  (380)  (284)
             
  $697  $712  $543 
             

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Equity Method Investees

 

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $3  $2  $21 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   2   —     (6)

International Segment

   3   —     20 

Luxury Segment

   (4)  (2)  (1)

Timeshare Segment

   10   (2)  1 
             

Total segment equity in earnings (losses)

   14   (2)  35 

Other unallocated corporate

   1   5   1 
             
  $15  $3  $36 
             
Depreciation and Amortization    
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $25  $24  $19 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   23   24   24 

International Segment

   23   23   18 

Luxury Segment

   17   7   10 

Timeshare Segment

   39   39   46 
             

Total segment depreciation and amortization

   127   117   117 

Other unallocated corporate

   62   61   57 

Discontinued operations

   8   10   10 
             
  $197  $188  $184 
             
Assets    
($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
  At Year-end
2006
  At Year-end
2005
 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $1,322  $1,104  $1,309 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   486   565   613 

International Segment

   855   1,225   1,333 

Luxury Segment

   748   755   656 

Timeshare Segment

   3,142   2,560   2,454 
             

Total segment assets

   6,553   6,209   6,365 

Other unallocated corporate

   2,336   2,288   2,062 

Discontinued operations

   53   91   103 
             
  $8,942  $8,588  $8,530 
             
Equity Method Investments    
($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
  At Year-end
2006
  At Year-end
2005
 

North American Full-Service Segment

  $16  $18  $21 

North American Limited-Service Segment

   75   35   50 

International Segment

   62   73   119 

Luxury Segment

   41   17   18 

Timeshare Segment

   99   168   115 
             

Total segment equity method investments

   293   311   323 

Other unallocated corporate

   23   21   26 
             
  $316  $332  $349 
             

Goodwill

($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
 At Year-end
2006
 At Year-end
2005

North American Full-Service Segment

  $406 $406 $407

North American Limited-Service Segment

   72  72  72

International Segment

   273  273  273

Luxury Segment

   170  170  172
          

Total segment goodwill

  $921 $921 $924
          
Capital Expenditures    
($ in millions)  2007 2006 2005

North American Full-Service Segment

  $446 $75 $197

North American Limited-Service Segment

   36  38  10

International Segment

   44  215  376

Luxury Segment

   35  104  84

Timeshare Segment

   56  28  27
          

Total segment capital expenditures

   617  460  694

Other unallocated corporate

   54  69  86
          
  $671 $529 $780
          

Segment expenses include selling expenses directly related to the operations of the businesses, aggregating $454$616 million in 2004, $4522007, $600 million in 20032006, and $421$609 million in 2002.2005. Approximately 9489 percent for 2007 and 90 percent for each of 2006 and 2005 of the selling expenses are related to our Timeshare segment.

The consolidated financial statements include the following related to international operations: salesoperations located outside the United States (which are predominately related to our International lodging segment): Revenues of $968$2,287 million in 2004, $7112007, $1,869 million in 20032006, and $584$1,388 million in 2002;2005; segment financial results of $140$341 million in 2004, $1022007 (32 percent from Europe, 30 percent from the Americas excluding the United States, 17 percent from Asia, 11 percent from the United Kingdom, 8 percent from the Middle East and Africa, and 2 percent from Australia), $298 million in 20032006, and $94$178 million in 2002;2005; and fixed assets of $358$257 million in 2004,2007 and $684 million in 2006. At year-end 2007, fixed assets totaling $257 million located outside the United States are included within the “Property and equipment” caption in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At year-end 2006, fixed assets totaling $684 million located outside the United States include fixed assets of $336 million which are included within the “Property and equipment” caption and $348 million of fixed assets which are included within the “Assets held for sale” caption in 2003 and $256 million in 2002.our Consolidated Balance Sheets. No individual country, other than the United States, constitutes a material portion of our sales,revenues, financial results or fixed assets.

 

20.VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

20. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSWe currently consolidate a holding company that holds 100 percent interest in four entities that are variable interest entities under FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities-revised” (“FIN 46(R)”). At year-end 2007, the combined capital in the four variable interest entities is less than $1 million, which is used primarily to fund hotel working capital. Our equity at risk was $3 million and we held 55 percent of the common equity shares of the holding company. The creditors of the holding company do not have general recourse to our credit.

We are party to a venture that develops and markets fractional ownership and residential interests. During the 2007 second quarter, we issued a guarantee to the senior lender of the venture in support of the senior loan facility and reevaluated our variable interests in the venture under FIN 46(R). At that time, we determined that we were the primary beneficiary and as such, we also consolidated this venture. During the 2007 third quarter, the guarantee was replaced with the issuance of a loan facility for $40 million, of which $36 million is receivable and outstanding at year-end 2007. Our issuance of the loan facility was a reconsideration event under FIN 46(R); we again determined we were the primary beneficiary and continue to consolidate the joint venture. At year-end 2007, the carrying amount of consolidated assets that are collateral for the variable interest entity’s obligations totaled $141 million and comprised $24 million of accounts receivable, $106 million of real estate held for development, property, equipment, and other long-term assets, and $11 million of cash. The creditors of the variable interest entity do not have general recourse to our credit.

In conjunction with the transaction with CTF described more fully in Footnote No. 8, “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” under the caption “2005 Acquisitions” we manage certain hotels on behalf of four tenant entities 100 percent owned by CTF, which lease the hotels from third-party owners. At year-end 2007, the number of hotels totaled 14. The entities have minimal equity and minimal assets comprised of hotel working capital. CTF placed money in a trust account to cover cash flow shortfalls and to meet rent payments. The terms of the trust require that the cash flows for the four tenant entities be pooled for purposes of making rent payments and determining cash flow shortfalls. At year-end 2007, the trust account held approximately $38 million. The entities are variable interest entities under FIN 46(R). We do not consolidate the entities because we do not bear the majority of the expected losses. We are secondarily liable for rent payments for eight of the 14 hotels in the event that there are cash flow shortfalls and there is no money left in the trust. Future minimum lease payments through the end of the lease term for these eight hotels total approximately $122 million. In addition, we are also secondarily liable for rent payments of up to an aggregate cap of $44 million for the six other hotels in the event that there are cash flow shortfalls.

 

21.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Equity Method Investments

We have equity method investments in entities that own properties wherefor which we provide management and/or franchise services and receive a fee.fees. In addition, in some cases we provide loans, preferred equity or guarantees to these entities. Our ownership interest in these equity method investments generally varies from 10 to 50 percent. The amount of our consolidated retained earnings that represents undistributed earnings attributable to our equity investments totaled $9 million at year-end 2007.

The following tables present financial data resulting from transactions with these related parties:

Income Statement Data

 

Income Statement Data

          

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Base management fees

  $72  $56  $48 

Incentive management fees

   8   4   4 

Cost reimbursements

   802   699   557 

Owned, leased, corporate housing and other revenue

   29   28   26 
   


 


 


Total revenue

  $911  $787  $635 
   


 


 


General, administrative and other

  $(33) $(11) $(11)

Reimbursed costs

   (802)  (699)  (557)

Gains and other income

   19   21   44 

Interest income

   74   77   66 

Reversal of (provision for) loan losses

   3   (2)  (5)

Equity in earnings (losses) – Synthetic fuel

   (28)  (10)  —   

Equity in earnings (losses) – Other

   (14)  (17)  (6)

Balance Sheet Data

             

              ($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

    

Current assets - accounts and notes receivable

  $72  $118     

Contract acquisition costs

   24   42     

Equity method investments

   249   468     

Loans to equity method investees

   526   558     

Other long-term receivables

   3   —       

Other long-term assets

   38   30     

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

   (3)  (2)    

Other payables and accruals

   (4)  (1)    

Other long-term liabilities

   (11)  (10)    
($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005 

Base management fees

  $56  $62  $83 

Franchise fees

   1   2   2 

Incentive management fees

   26   22   14 

Cost reimbursements

   510   649   936 

Owned, leased, corporate housing, and other revenue

   —     —     19 
             

Total revenue

  $593  $735  $1,054 
             

General, administrative, and other

  $(4) $(1) $(19)

Reimbursed costs

   (510)  (649)  (936)

Gains and other income

   25   28   54 

Interest expense

   (1)  (1)  —   

Interest income

   4   4   31 

(Provision for) reversal of provision for loan losses

   (12)  1   —   

Equity in earnings

   15   3   36 

Balance Sheet Data

 

($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
  At Year-end
2006
 

Current assets-accounts and notes receivable

  $42  $76 

Deferred development

   2   —   

Contract acquisition costs

   33   34 

Equity and cost method investments

   316   377 

Loans to equity method investees

   21   27 

Long-term deferred tax assets, net

   1   4 

Current liabilities:

   

Other payables and accruals

   (2)  (2)

Other long-term liabilities

   (16)  (13)

Summarized information relating tofor the entities in which we have equity method investments is as follows:

($ in millions)

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Income Statement Summary

             

Sales

  $1,617  $1,487  $1,322 
   


 


 


Net loss

  $(69) $(102) $(59)
   


 


 


   

 

2004


  2003

    

Balance Sheet Summary

             

Assets (primarily comprised of hotel real estate managed by us)

  $3,834  $4,171     
   


 


    

Liabilities

  $3,223  $3,275     
   


 


    

21. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIESIncome Statement Summary

 

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005

Sales

  $1,622  $1,479  $1,975
            

Net income

  $134  $170  $259
            

FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“the Interpretation”), was effective for all enterprises with variable interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. FIN 46(R), which was revised in December 2003, was effective for all entities to which the provisions of FIN 46 were not applied as of December 24, 2003. We applied the provisions of FIN 46(R) to all entities subject to the Interpretation as of March 26, 2004. Under FIN 46(R), if an entity is determined to be a variable interest entity, it must be consolidated by the enterprise that absorbs the majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, the “primary beneficiary.”Balance Sheet Summary

 

($ in millions)  At Year-end
2007
  At Year-end
2006

Assets (primarily comprised of hotel real estate managed by us)

  $3,856  $4,325
        

Liabilities

  $2,536  $2,830
        

22.RELATIONSHIP WITH MAJOR CUSTOMER

As a result of adopting FIN 46(R)year-end 2007, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (“Host”), we consolidatedknown as Host Marriott Corporation prior to April 18, 2006, owned or leased 149 lodging properties operated by us under long-term agreements. We recognized revenues from lodging properties owned or leased by Host (which are included in our two synthetic fuel joint venturesNorth American Full-Service, North American Limited-Service, and International segments) for the last three fiscal years as of March 26, 2004. At December 31, 2004,shown in the ventures had working capital of $6 million, and the book value of the synthetic fuel facilities (“the Facilities”) was $29 million. The ventures have no long-term debt. See Footnote No. 7, “Synthetic Fuel,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure related to our synthetic fuel operation, including the nature, purpose and size of the two synthetic fuel joint ventures, as well as the nature of our involvement and the timing of when our involvement began.following table:

 

We currently consolidate four other entities that are variable interest entities under FIN 46(R). These entities were established with the same partner to lease four Marriott-branded hotels. The combined capital in the four variable interest entities is $3 million, which is used primarily to fund hotel working capital. Our equity at risk is $2 million, and we hold 55 percent of the common equity shares.

We have one other significant interest in an entity that is a variable interest entity under FIN 46(R). In February 2001, we entered into a shareholders’ agreement with an unrelated third party to form a joint venture to own and lease luxury hotels to be managed by us. In February 2002, the joint venture signed its first lease with a third-party landlord. The initial capital structure of the joint venture is $4 million of debt and $4 million of equity. We hold 35 percent of the equity, or $1 million, and 65 percent of the debt, or $3 million, for a total investment of $4 million. In addition, each equity partner entered into various guarantees with the landlord to guarantee lease payments. Our total exposure under these guarantees is $17 million. Our maximum exposure to loss is $21 million. We do not consolidate the joint venture since we do not bear the majority of the expected losses or expected residual returns.

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005

Revenues

  $2,580  $2,475  $2,427
            

 

Additionally, Host is a partner in several unconsolidated partnerships that own lodging properties operated by us under long-term agreements. As of year-end 2007, Host was affiliated with 124 such properties operated by us. The revenues associated with those properties (which are included in our North American Full-Service, North American Limited-Service, and International segments) that were recognized by the Company for the last three fiscal years are shown in the following table:

 

($ in millions)  2007  2006  2005

Revenues

  $350  $353  $352
            

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA – UNAUDITED

 

($ in millions, except per share data)

  Fiscal Year 20041, 3

  Fiscal Year 2007(1), (2) 
First
Quarter


  Second
Quarter


  Third
Quarter


  Fourth
Quarter


  Fiscal
Year


Revenues2

  $2,252  $2,402  $2,304  $3,141  $10,099
  

  

  

  

  

  Fir+st
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year 

Operating income2

  $151  $118  $99  $109  $477

Revenues(3)

  $2,836  $3,122  $2,943  $4,089  $12,990 
                

Operating income(3)

  $237  $335  $210  $406  $1,188 
  

  

  

  

  

                

Income from continuing operations

  $114  $160  $132  $188  $594  $164  $175  $122  $236  $697 

Discontinued operations, after tax

   —     —     1   1   2

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   18   32   9   (60)  (1)
  

  

  

  

  

                

Net income

  $114  $160  $133  $189  $596  $182  $207  $131  $176  $696 
  

  

  

  

  

                

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $.47  $.67  $.55  $.79  $2.47  $0.40  $0.43  $0.31  $0.62  $1.75 

Diluted earnings (losses) per share from discontinued operations

   —     —     .01   —     .01

Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations

   0.04   0.08   0.02   (0.16)  —   
  

  

  

  

  

                

Diluted earnings per share

  $.47  $.67  $.56  $.79  $2.48  $0.44  $0.51  $0.33  $0.46  $1.75 
  

  

  

  

  

                

 

($ in millions, except per share data)

 

  Fiscal Year 20031, 3

  First
Quarter


  Second
Quarter


  Third
Quarter


  Fourth
Quarter


  Fiscal
Year


Revenues2

  $2,023  $2,016  $2,109  $2,866  $9,014
   

  


 


 


 

Operating income2

  $58  $68  $90  $161  $377
   

  


 


 


 

Income from continuing operations

  $87  $126  $93  $170  $476

Discontinued operations, after tax

   29   (1)  (1)  (1)  26
   

  


 


 


 

Net income (loss)

  $116  $125  $92  $169  $502
   

  


 


 


 

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $.36  $.52  $.38  $.69  $1.94

Diluted earnings (losses) per share from discontinued operations

   .12   (.01)  (.01)  —     .11
   

  


 


 


 

Diluted earnings (losses) per share

  $.48  $.51  $.37  $.69  $2.05
   

  


 


 


 


($ in millions, except per share data)  Fiscal Year 2006(1), (2) 
   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Fiscal Year 

Revenues(3)

  $2,648  $2,852  $2,697  $3,798  $11,995 
                     

Operating income(3)

  $230  $292  $227  $338  $1,087 
                     

Income from continuing operations

  $167  $182  $144  $219  $712 

Discontinued operations, after-tax

   3   4   (3)  1   5 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax

   (109)  —     —     —     (109)
                     

Net income

  $61  $186  $141  $220  $608 
                     

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

  $0.38  $0.42  $0.34  $0.52  $1.65 

Diluted losses per share from cumulative effect of accounting change

   (0.25)  —     —     —     (0.25)

Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations

   0.01   0.01   (0.01)  —     0.01 
                     

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.14  $0.43  $0.33  $0.52  $1.41 
                     

1(1)

The quarters consisted of 12 weeks, except for the fourth quarter,quarters, which consisted of 16 weeks.

(2)

Balances

All share and per share amounts reflect Senior Living Services and Distribution Services businesses as discontinued operations.

3the June 2006 stock split. The sum of the earnings per share for the four quarters differs from annual earnings per share due to the required method of computing the weighted average shares in interim periods.

(3)

Balances do not reflect the impact of the synthetic fuel business as the impact of that business is now reflected in discontinued operations.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

 

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’sour management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act)Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), and management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives. You should note that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. Based upon the foregoing evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures arewere effective to ensureprovide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Companyus in the reports that it fileswe file or submitssubmit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SecuritiesSEC, and Exchange Commission.

to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

See “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” included in Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Item 9B. Other Information.

Item 9B.Other Information.

None.

PART III

Items 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.

As described below, we incorporate certain information appearing in the Proxy Statement we will furnish to our shareholders in connection with the 20052008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K Annual Report.10-K.

 

ITEM 10.  We incorporate this information by reference to the “Directors Standing For Election,” “Directors Continuing In Office,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Audit Committee”Committee,” and “Selection of Director Nominees” sections of our Proxy Statement. We have included information regarding our executive officers and our Code of Ethics below.
ITEM 11.  We incorporate this information by reference to the “Executive Compensation” section of our Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12.  We incorporate this information by reference to the “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” and the “Stock Ownership” sections of our Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13.  We incorporate this information by reference to the “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”Transactions, and Director Independence” section of our Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14.  We incorporate this information by reference to the “Principal Independent Auditor Fee Disclosure” and the “Pre-Approval of Independent Auditor Fees and Services Policy” sections of our Proxy Statement.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below is certain information with respect to our executive officers. The information set forth below is as of February 1, 2008.

 

Name and Title


  

Age


  

Business Experience


J.W. Marriott, Jr.

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

  7275  Mr.J.W. Marriott, Jr. has been Chief Executive Officer of Marriott International, Inc. (the Company) and its predecessors since 1972, and Chairman of the Board since 1985. He joined Marriott Corporation (now known as Host Marriott Corporation)Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) in 1956, became President and a director in 1964, Chief Executive Officer in 1972 and Chairman of the Board in 1985.1964. Mr. Marriott also isserves as a director of the National Geographic Society and theUnited States Naval Academy Endowment Trust.Foundation. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of the National Urban League andGeographic Society, The J. Willard & Alice S. Marriott Foundation and the National Business Council. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the World Travel & Tourism Council and the Business Council. In addition, he is also Chairmanchairman of the President’s Export Council, a presidential advisory committee on export trade,trade. Mr. Marriott is also on the U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board (TTAB) and the Secure Borders Open Doors Advisory Committee (SBODAC). In addition, he serves as Chairmanchairman of the Leadership Council of the Laura Bush Foundation for America’s Libraries. Mr. Marriott has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its inception, and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company formerly known as Marriott International, Inc. (“Old MI”) (subsequently named Sodexho, Inc. and now a wholly owned subsidiary of Sodexho Alliance) from October 1993 until the Company’s spin-off from Old MI in March 1998. Mr. Marriott has served as a director of the Company since March 1998. J.W. Marriott, Jr.He is the father of John W. Marriott III.III, the non-employee Vice Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Carl T. Berquist

Executive Vice President

Financial Information and

Enterprise Risk Management

56Carl T. Berquist joined Marriott International in December 2002 as Executive Vice President of Financial Information and Enterprise Risk Management. He also serves as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company. Prior to joining Marriott, Mr. Berquist was a partner at Arthur Andersen LLP, most recently as managing partner of the mid-Atlantic region, which included five offices from Philadelphia, PA, to Richmond, VA. Mr. Berquist is a member of Penn State’s Smeal Business School’s Board of Visitors and is a member of the board of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., and several private companies.

Simon F. Cooper

President and Chief Operating Officer

The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.

  5962  Simon F. Cooper joined Marriott International in 1998 as President of Marriott Lodging Canada and Senior Vice President of Marriott Lodging International. In 2000, the Company added the New England Region to his Canadian responsibilities. Prior to joining Marriott, Mr. Cooper was President and Chief Operating Officer of Delta Hotels and Resorts. He is a fellow of the Board of Trustees for the Educational Institute of the American Hotel and Motel Association and is a member of the Board for the Canadian Tourism Commission.Association. Mr. Cooper was appointed to his current position as President and COO, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, in February 2001.

Name and Title

Age

Business Experience

Edwin D. Fuller

Vice President;President

President and Managing Director -

MarriottInternational Lodging International

  5962  Edwin D. Fuller joined Marriott in 1972 and held several sales positions before being appointed Vice President of Marketing in 1979. He became Regional Vice President of the Midwest Region in 1985, Regional Vice President of the Western Region in 1988, and in 1990 was promoted to Senior Vice President &and Managing Director of International Lodging, with a focus on developing the international group of hotels. He was named Executive Vice President and Managing Director of International Lodging in 1994 and was promoted to his current position in 1997.

Brendan M. Keegan

Vice President;Robert J. McCarthy

Executive Vice President

Human ResourcesNorth American Lodging Operations

and Global Brand Management

  6154  Brendan M. Keegan joined Marriott Corporation in 1971 in the Corporate Organization Development Department and subsequently held several human resources positions, including Vice President of Organization Development and Executive Succession Planning. He was named Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Marriott Service Group, in 1986. Mr. Keegan was appointed to his current position of Executive Vice President of Human Resources for our worldwide human resources functions, including compensation, benefits, labor and employee relations, staffing and development, in 1997.

Name and Title


Age

Business Experience


John W. Marriott III

Executive Vice President – Lodging

44John W. Marriott III joined Marriott in 1976 and became Executive Vice President - Lodging for Marriott International in January 2003. He is responsible for leading Global Sales and Marketing, Brand Management Operations Planning and Support, and North American Lodging Operations.Robert J. “Bob” McCarthy has over 30 years experience with Marriott. Prior to his current position, Mr. Marriotthe served as Executive Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. Before that, he wasNorth American Lodging Operations for Marriott International; Senior Vice President of the Northeast region for Marriott’s Mid-Atlantic Region. He has also worked in the Company’s treasury departmentMarriott Lodging; and held numerous other positions, including Executive Assistant to the Chairman, directorVice President of marketing, director of foodOperations for Courtyard and beverage, sales manager and restaurant manager. He started with the Company working in a hotel kitchen.Fairfield Inn. He is onalso Chairman of the boardBoard of directors for Marriott International, Inc. and sits onManagers of Avendra, LLC, a procurement company serving the advisory board for The Ritz-Carlton Company, L.L.C. In April 2002, Mr. Marriott was named by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Japanese government to co-chair a special taskforce to promote travel between the United States and Japan. In January 2004, Mr. Marriott was named one of “The 25 Most Influential Executives” byBusiness Travel News. John W. Marriott III is the son of J.W. Marriott, Jr.hospitality industry.

Robert J. McCarthyDavid A. Rodriguez

Executive Vice President

North American Lodging OperationsGlobal Human Resources

  5149  

Robert J. McCarthyDavid A. Rodriguez joined Marriott International and assumed the role of Senior Vice President-Staffing & Development in 1998. In 2003, he was namedappointed Executive Vice President, North American Lodging Operations, in January 2003. From

March 2000 until January 2003, Mr. McCarthy was Executive Vice President, Operations Planning and Support for Marriott Lodging. He joined Marriott in 1975, became Regional Director of Sales/Marketing for Marriott Hotels Resorts & Suites in 1982, Director of Marketing for Marriott Suite Hotels/Compact Hotels in 1985, Vice President Operations and Marketing for Fairfield Inn and Courtyard in 1991 and Senior Vice President for the Northeast RegionPresident-Human Resources for Marriott Lodging and in 1995.

2006 he assumed the role of Executive Vice President-Global Human Resources for Marriott International. Prior to joining Marriott International, he held several senior roles in human resources at Citicorp (now Citigroup) from 1989-1998.

JosephEdward A. Ryan

Executive Vice President and

General Counsel

  6254  JosephEdward A. Ryan joined Marriott in 1994 aswas named Executive Vice President and General Counsel.Counsel in November 2006. He joined Marriott in 1996 as Assistant General Counsel, was promoted to Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel in 1999, when he had responsibility for all new management agreements and real estate development worldwide for full-service and limited-service hotels; in 2005 he also assumed responsibility for all corporate transactions and corporate governance. Prior to that time, hejoining Marriott, Mr. Ryan was a partner inat the law firm of O’MelvenyHogan & Myers, serving as the Managing Partner from 1993 until his departure. He joined O’Melveny & MyersHartson in 1967 and was admitted as a partner in 1976.Washington, D.C.

William J. Shaw

Director, President and

Chief Operating Officer

  5962  William J. Shaw has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since 1997 (including service in the same capacity with Old MI until March 1998). He joined Marriott Corporation in 1974, was elected Corporate Controller in 1979 and a Corporate Vice President in 1982. In 1986, Mr. Shaw was elected Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer of Marriott Corporation. He was elected Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Marriott Corporation in 1988. In 1992, he was elected President of the Marriott Service Group. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of the University of Notre Dame Suburban Hospital Foundation and on the NCAA Leadership Advisory Board. Mr. Shaw served as a director of Old MI from March 1998 through June 2001. He has served as a director of the Company since March 1997.

Name and Title


  

Age


  

Business Experience


Arne M. Sorenson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and

President, - Continental European

Lodging

  4649  Arne M. Sorenson joined Old MIMarriott in 1996 as Senior Vice President of Business Development. He was instrumental in our acquisition of the Renaissance Hotel Group in 1997. Prior to joining Marriott, he was a partner in the law firm of Latham & Watkins in Washington, D.C., where he played a key role in 1992 and 1993 in the distribution of Old MI by Marriott Corporation. Mr. Sorenson was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 1998 and assumed the additional title of President, Continental European Lodging, in January 2003. Mr. Sorenson serves on the Board of Regents of Luther College in Decorah, Iowa. He also serves on the Board of Directors of The Luther Institute.

James M. Sullivan

Executive Vice President -

Lodging Development

  6164  James M. Sullivan joined Marriott Corporation in 1980, departed in 1983 to acquire, manage, expand, and subsequently sell a successful restaurant chain, and returned to Marriott Corporation in 1986 as Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions. Mr. Sullivan became Senior Vice President, Finance – LodgingFinance-Lodging in 1989, Senior Vice President – LodgingPresident-Lodging Development in 1990 and was appointed to his current position in 1995. He serves as a director of IntegraLifeSciences, Holding Corporation.

Stephen P. Weisz

Vice President;President

President – Marriott Vacation Club International

  5457  Stephen P. Weisz joined Marriott Corporation in 1972 and was named Regional Vice President of the Mid-Atlantic Region in 1991. Mr. Weisz had previously served as Senior Vice President of Rooms Operations before being appointed Vice President of the Revenue Management Group. Mr. Weisz became Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Marriott Hotels, Resorts & Suites in 1992 and Executive Vice President – LodgingPresident-Lodging Brands in 1994. Mr. Weisz was appointed to his current position in 1996. He serves as a director of Mindshare Technologies, Inc.

Code of Ethics

The Company has long maintained and enforced an Ethical Conduct Policy that applies toall Marriott associates, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer.Officer, and to each member of our Board of Directors. We have posted our Code of Ethics (“Ethical Conduct Policy, which has been in substantially its current form since the mid-1980s,Policy”) in the Corporate Governance“Corporate Governance” section of our Investor Relations webWeb site,http://ir.shareholder.com/mar/corporategovernance.cfmwww.Marriott.com/investor. Any future changes or amendments to our Ethical Conduct Policy and any waiver of our Ethical Conduct Policy that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, or member of the Board of Directors, will be posted tohttp://ir.shareholder.com/mar/corporategovernance.cfmwww.Marriott.com/investor.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

(1)(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted under Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K.

(2)(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Information relating to schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC is included in the notes to the financial statements and is incorporated herein by reference.

(3)(3) EXHIBITS

Any shareholder who wants a copy of the following Exhibits may obtain one from us upon request at a charge that reflects the reproduction cost of such Exhibits. Requests should be made to the Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Marriott Drive, Department 52/862, Washington, D.C. 20058.

 

Exhibit No.


 

Description


  

Incorporation by Reference

(where a report or registration statement is

indicated below, that

document has been

previously filed with the SEC

and the applicable

exhibit is incorporated by

reference thereto)


3.1

3.(i).1

 Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.  Exhibit No. 33.(i) to our Form 8-K filed August 22, 2006 (File No. 001-13881).

3.(i).2

Certificate of Elimination for the Capped Convertible Preferred Stock and ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock (nullifying and eliminating supplementary Certificates of Designation previously filed as Exhibits No. 3.1 and 3.2 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 18, 1999.16, 2000, filed July 28, 2000).Exhibit 3(i) to our Form 8-K filed February 7, 2006 (File No. 001-13881).
3.2

3.(ii)

 Amended and Restated Bylaws.  Exhibit No. 3.23.(ii) to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2003.8-K filed August 22, 2006 (File No. 001-13881).
3.3

4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate.Exhibit No. 4.5 to our Form S-3ASR filed December 8, 2005 (File No. 333-130212).

4.2

 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of August 9, 1999, with The Bank of New York, as Rights Agent.  Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 10, 1999.1999 (File No. 001-13881).
3.4

4.3

 CertificateForm of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Marriott International, Inc. ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock.Certificate.  Exhibit No. 3.199.4 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 16, 2000.8-A/A filed April 3, 1998 (File No. 001-13881).
3.5Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Marriott International, Inc. Capped Convertible Preferred Stock.Exhibit No. 3.2 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 16, 2000.
4.1

4.4

 Indenture dated November 16, 1998, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee.Bank.  Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.1999 (File No. 001-13881).
4.2Form of 6.875% Series B Note due 2005.Exhibit No. 4.3 to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
4.3

4.5

 Form of 7.875% Series C Note due 2009.  

Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Form 8-K dated

filed on September 20, 1999.

21, 1999 (File No. 001-13881).
4.4

4.6

 Form of 8.125% Series D Note due 2005.

Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Form 8-K dated

March 28, 2000.

4.5Form of 7.0%7.000% Series E Note due 2008.  

Exhibit No. 4.1 (f)4.1(f) to our Form S-3 filed on

January 17, 2001.

2001 (File No. 333-53860).

Exhibit No.


 

Description


  

Incorporation by Reference

(where a report or registration statement is

indicated below, that

document has been

previously filed with the SEC

and the applicable

exhibit is incorporated by

reference thereto)


10.1

  4.7

 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.Form of 4.625% Series F Note due 2012.  Appendix B inExhibit No. 4.2 to our definitive proxy statementForm 8-K filed on March 28, 2002.June 14, 2005 (File No. 001-13881).
10.2

  4.8

 

$1.5 billion Credit Agreement dated

July 31, 2001, as amended, with Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and certain banks.

Form of 5.810% Series G Note due 2015.
  Exhibit No. 10 to our Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 7, 2001, and Exhibit No. 10.14.1 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 6, 2002 (AmendmentJune 16, 2006 (File No. 1)001-13881).
10.3

  4.9

 $500 millionForm of 6.200% Series H Note due 2016.Exhibit No. 4.2 to our Form 8-K filed June 14, 2006 (File No. 001-13881).

  4.10

Form of 6.375% Series I Note due 2017.Exhibit No. 4.2 to our Form 8-K filed June 25, 2007 (File No. 001-13881).

  4.11

Form of 5.625% Series J Note due 2013.Exhibit No. 4.2 to our Form 8-K filed October 19, 2007 (File No. 001-13881).

  10.1

U.S. $2.5 billion Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 5, 2003,May 14, 2007, with Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and certain banks.  Exhibit No. 10 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 12, 2003.8-K filed May 16, 2007 (File No. 001-13881).
10.4

*10.2

 Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interest in Synthetic American Fuel Enterprises I, LLC (“SynFuel I”) datedMarriott International, Inc. Stock and Cash Incentive Plan-Amended and Restated as of January 28, 2003 (“SynFuel I Purchase Agreement”).1, 2008.  Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.Filed with this report.
10.5Amendment to SynFuel I Purchase Agreement.Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.
10.6Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of SynFuel I dated as of January 28, 2003.Exhibit No.

*10.3 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.

10.7Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interest in Synthetic American Fuel Enterprises II, LLC (“SynFuel II”) dated as of January 28, 2003 (“SynFuel II Purchase Agreement”).Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.
10.8Amendment to SynFuel II Purchase Agreement.Exhibit No. 10.5 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.
10.9Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of SynFuel II dated as of January 28, 2003.Exhibit No. 10.6 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.
10.10Guaranty of Marriott International, Inc. dated as of January 28, 2003, of certain obligations under the SynFuel I and II purchase agreements and the amended and restated SynFuel I and II limited liability company agreements.Exhibit No. 10.7 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20, 2003.
10.11Second Amendment Agreement regarding Synthetic American Fuel Enterprises I, LLC dated as of October 6, 2004.

Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Form 8-K dated

October 6, 2004.

10.12Third Amendment Agreement regarding Synthetic American Fuel Enterprises II, LLC dated as of October 6, 2004.

Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Form 8-K dated

October 6, 2004.

10.13 Marriott International, Inc. Executive Officer Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan-Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008.  Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 10, 2004.Filed with this report.
10.14Marriott International, Inc. Executive Officer Incentive Plan and Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan.Exhibit No. 10.2 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 10, 2004.

*10.4

Exhibit No.

Description


Incorporation by Reference

(where a report or registration statement is

indicated below, that document has been

previously filed with the SEC and the applicable

exhibit is incorporated by reference thereto)


10.15 Form of Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.Exhibit No. 10.3 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 10, 2004.
10.16Form of Non-Employee Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.Exhibit No. 10.4 to our Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 10, 2004.
10.17Form of Executive Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. 2002 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.  Filed with this report.

*10.5

Form of Executive Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.Filed with this report.

*10.6

Form of MI Shares Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.Filed with this report.

*10.7

Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.Filed with this report.

*10.8

Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement for the Marriott International, Inc. Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (For Non-Employee Directors).Filed with this report.

*10.9

Summary of Marriott International, Inc. Director Compensation.Filed with this report.

*10.10

Marriott International, Inc. Executive Officer Incentive Plan and Executive Officer Individual Performance Plan.Filed with this report.

Exhibit No.

Description

Incorporation by Reference

(where a report is indicated below, that

document has been previously filed with the SEC

and the applicable exhibit is incorporated by

reference thereto)

12

 Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.  Filed with this report.

21

 Subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc.  Filed with this report.

23

 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.  Filed with this report.

31.1

 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).  Filed with this report.

31.2

 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).  Filed with this report.

32

 Section 1350 Certifications.  FiledFurnished with this report.

 

*Denotes management contract or compensatory plan.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 2215ndth day of February 2005.2008.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By

By:
 

/s/    J.W. Marriott, Jr.


 

J.W. Marriott, Jr.

 

Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons on our behalf in the capacities indicated and on the date indicated above.

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER:

 

/s/    J.W. Marriott, Jr.        


 

J.W. Marriott, Jr.Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer

and Director

J.W. Marriott, Jr.

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER:

 

/s/    Arne M. Sorenson        


 

Arne M. SorensonExecutive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Arne M. Sorenson

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER:

 

/s/    Carl T. Berquist        


 

Carl T. BerquistExecutive Vice President, Financial

Information and Enterprise Risk Management

Carl T. Berquist

DIRECTORS:

 

/s/    Richard S. Braddock        


/s/    George Muñoz        


Richard S. Braddock, Director

George Muñoz, Director

/s/    Lawrence W. Kellner        


/s/    Harry J. Pearce        


Lawrence W. Kellner, Director

Harry J. Pearce, Director

/s/    Debra L. Lee        


/s/    Roger W. Sant        


Debra L. Lee, Director

Roger W. Sant, Director

/s/    John W. Marriott III        


/s/    Harry J. Pearce        

John W. Marriott III, Vice Chairman of the BoardHarry J. Pearce, Director

/s/    Lawrence W. Kellner        

/s/    Steven S Reinemund        

Lawrence W. Kellner, DirectorSteven S Reinemund, Director

/s/    Debra L. Lee        

 

/s/    William J. Shaw        


John W. Marriott III,Debra L. Lee, Director

 

William J. Shaw, Director

/s/    Floretta Dukes McKenzie        


 

/s/    Lawrence M. Small        


Floretta Dukes McKenzie, Director

 

Lawrence M. Small, Director

/s/    George Muñoz        

George Muñoz, Director

 

85113