UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

x    Annual Report Pursuant to SectionANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 orOR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act ofOF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

    For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, or

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, or
¨    Transition Report Pursuant to SectionTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 orOR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act ofOF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

    For the transition period fromto

For the transition period fromto

 

Commission File No.: 001-16753

 

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware  06-1500476

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

  

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

12400 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100

San Diego, California

  92130
(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (866) 871-8519

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class  Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

  New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  þ  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes  ¨  No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ  No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ

 

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨        Accelerated filer  þ        Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act of 1934)Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨  No  þ  No  ¨

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of June 30, 20042005 was $229,486,035$425,716,258 based on a closing sale price of $15.29$15.03 per share.

 

As of March 8, 2005,9, 2006, there were 28,344,16232,130,241 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

 

Documents Incorporated By Reference: Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 4, 2005April 12, 2006 have been incorporated by reference into Part II and Part III of this Form 10-K.

 



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item


       Page

       Page

    PART I       PART I   

1.

    Business  1    Business  1

1A.

    Risk Factors  12

1B.

    Unresolved Staff Comments  18

2.

    Properties  15    Properties  18

3.

    Legal Proceedings  15    Legal Proceedings  18

4.

    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  15    

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  19
    PART II       PART II   

5.

    

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  16    

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  20

6.

    Selected Financial Data  17    

Selected Financial Data

  21

7.

    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  19    

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  23

7A.

    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk  36    

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

  35

8.

    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  37    

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  36

9.

    Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  62    

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  65

9A.

    Controls and Procedures  62    

Controls and Procedures

  65

9B.

    Other Information  62    

Other Information

  67
    PART III       PART III   

10.

    Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant  63    

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

  68

11.

    Executive Compensation  63    

Executive Compensation

  68

12.

    

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  63    

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  68

13.

    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions  63    

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

  68

14.

    Principal Accountant Fees and Services  63    

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  68
    PART IV       PART IV   

15.

    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  64    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  69
    Signatures  69    Signatures  75

 

i


PART I

 

Item 1.    Business

Item 1.Business

 

Our Company

 

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. “AMN”, is a leadingthe largest temporary healthcare staffing company andin the largestUnited States. As the leading nationwide provider of travel nurse staffing services. Weservices and a leading provider of locum tenens (temporary physician staffing) and physician permanent placement services, we recruit physicians, nurses and allied health professionals, our “temporary healthcare“healthcare professionals,” nationally and internationally and place them on temporary assignments of variable lengths of assignments and in permanent positions at acute careacute-care hospitals, physician practice groups and other healthcare facilities throughout the United States. Approximately 93%With the acquisition of The MHA Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries (“MHA”) on November 2, 2005, we expanded our service lines to include temporary and permanent physician staffing and clearly distinguished AMN as the largest healthcare professionals are nurses, while the remainder are technicians, therapists and technologists. We actively work with a pre-screened pool of prospective temporary healthcare professionals. We had, on average, over 6,200 temporary healthcare professionals on assignment during the fourth quarter of 2004.staffing company.

 

Our staffing services are marketed to two distinct customer bases: (1) temporary healthcare professionals and (2) hospital and healthcare facility clients.facilities. We use a multi-brand recruiting strategy to enhance our ability to successfully attract temporarynursing and allied healthcare professionals in the United States and internationally. Our separateWe market our nurse and allied healthcare professional staffing to our healthcare professionals under recruitment brands areincluding American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NurseChoice InDemand, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing, Thera Tech Staffing, Med Travelers, RN Demand, and O’Grady-PeytonO’Grady Peyton International. Each brand has distinct geographicclinician focus, market strengths and brand reputation. NursesWe market our travel nursing services to hospitals and healthcare facilities under one brand, AMN Healthcare, as a single staffing provider with access to healthcare professionals from several recruitment brands. We market allied services to our clients under the brand names Thera Tech Staffing and Med Travelers, and we market long term nursing services to our clients under the brand name O’Grady Peyton International. We market our locum tenens and physician permanent placement services under the brand names Staff Care, Inc. and Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, respectively, to both healthcare professionals and hospital and healthcare facilities and physician staffing groups.

At the end of 2005, we had healthcare professionals on assignment at over 1,500 different healthcare facility clients. We provide services to acute-care and sub-acute healthcare facilities, physician groups, dialysis centers, clinics and schools. Our hospital and healthcare facility clients utilize our services to cost-effectively manage shortages in their staff due to a variety of circumstances such as attrition, new unit openings, seasonal patient census variations, the physician and nurse staffing shortage and other short and long-term staffing needs. In addition to providing continuity of care and quality patient care, we believe hospitals and healthcare facilities contract with us due to our skilled permanent and temporary healthcare professionals, our ability to meet their specific staffing needs, our flexible staffing assignment lengths, our reliable and superior customer service, our ability to offer a large national network of permanent and temporary healthcare professionals and our ability to provide temporary staffing solutions while we assist the client in filling physician permanent staffing needs.

Physicians, nurses and allied healthcare professionals join us on temporary assignments for a wide variety of reasons that include: seeking flexible work opportunities, traveling toexploring different areas of the country, building their clinical skills and resume by working at prestigious healthcare facilities, and escaping the demands and political environment of working as a permanent staff nurse. and working through life and career transitions.

Our large number of hospital and healthcare facility clients provides us with the opportunity to offer travelingtemporary or permanent positions in all 50 states and in a variety of work environments.environments and clinical settings. In addition, we provide our temporary healthcare professionals with an attractive benefits package includingthat may include free or subsidized housing, free or reimbursed travel, reimbursement,competitive wages, professional development opportunities, a 401(k) plan, and health and professional liability insurance. We believe that we attract temporary healthcare professionals due to our long-standing reputation for providing a high level of service, our numerous job opportunities, our benefit packages, our innovative marketing programs and word-of-mouth referrals from our thousands of current and former temporary healthcare professionals.

We market our services to hospitals and healthcare facilities generally under one brand, AMN Healthcare, as a single staffing provider with access to temporary healthcare professionals from several recruitment brands. At the end of 2004, we had over 6,000 contracts with hospital and healthcare facility clients. During 2004, at any given time, we had temporary healthcare professionals on assignment at approximately 1,000 different healthcare facility clients. Over 95% of our temporary healthcare professional assignments are at acute-care hospitals. Our clients include hospitals and healthcare systems such as Georgetown University Hospital, HCA, NYU Medical Center, Stanford Health Care, UCLA Medical Center and The University of Chicago Hospitals. We also provide services to sub-acute healthcare facilities, dialysis centers, clinics and schools. Our hospital and healthcare facility clients utilize our services to cost-effectively manage shortages in their staff due to a variety of circumstances, such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), new unit openings, seasonal patient census variations and other short and long-term staffing needs. In addition to providing continuity of care and quality patient care, we believe hospitals and healthcare facilities contract with us due to our high-quality temporary healthcare professionals, our ability to meet their specific staffing needs, our flexible staffing assignment lengths, our reliable and deep infrastructure, our superior customer service and our ability to offer a large national network of temporary healthcare professionals.

We believe that we have organized our operating model to deliver consistent, high-quality sales and service efforts to our two distinct client bases. Processes within our operating model have been developed and are in place with the intent to maximize the quantity and quality of assignment requests, or “orders,” from our hospital and healthcare facility clients and increase the expediency and probability of successfully placing our temporary healthcare professionals. The consistent quality of the benefit and support services which we provide to our temporary healthcare professionals is also critical to our success, since the majority of our temporary healthcare professionals stay with us for multiple assignments.

Industry Overview

 

In 2004, totalTotal healthcare expenditures in the United States were estimated at $1.8$1.9 trillion during 2005, representing approximately 15.5%15.6% of the U.S. gross domestic product, and grew approximately 7% over 20032004 according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Over the next decade, an aging U.S. population and advances in medical technology are expected to drive increases in hospital patient populations and the consumption of healthcare services. As a result, total healthcare expenditures are projected to increase to approximately $3.3$3.6 trillion by 2013.2014.

 

The temporary healthcare staffing industry accounted for approximately $9.8$10.0 billion in revenue in 20042005 according to estimates byThe Staffing Industry Report. Approximately 65% of the temporary healthcare staffing industry, and is comprised of approximately 62% nurse staffing, 12% locum tenens, and approximately 35% is comprised ofthe balance in allied health physicians and other healthcare professional staffing. From 1996 through 2000, theThe temporary healthcare staffing industry grewwas estimated to have grown at 2.5% in 2005 and has grown each year at a compound annual growth rate of 13%,approximately 9% since 1997, except during 2003 and this growth accelerated to a compound2004 when the industry declined on an annual growth rate of approximately 21% from 2000 to 2002. Duringbasis. We believe that the decline during 2003 the demand for temporary healthcare professionals declined due to a number of factors. In particular, we believe hospitalsand 2004 reflected hospitals’ increased theirfocus on internal nurse recruitment efforts, stretched the productivityover-utilization of permanent labor staff and maximizedgreater reliance on cost control efforts to reduce outsourced staffing solutions. In addition, we believe2005, increased job turnover among permanent staff at our hospital andthe hospitals contributed to higher utilization of temporary nurses.

We expect the temporary healthcare facility clients, influenced bystaffing industry to grow modestly in 2006 based on favorable economic conditions during 2003, were more likely to work overtime and less likely to leave their positions, creating fewer vacanciesan increase in hospital staff job openings and fewer opportunities for us to recruit and place our temporary healthcare professionals.turnover. While the market declined between 2002 and 2004, itthis growth is expected to achieve modest growthbe positive and expand the opportunities available to healthcare professionals, the available supply of professionals is not expected to keep pace with the increase in 2005.demand.

Competition

 

The number ofhealthcare staffing industry is highly competitive. We compete in national, regional and local markets with full-service staffing companies and specialized temporary staffing agencies for both healthcare professionals on assignment with us decreased 12% from an average of 7,113 in 2003 to an average of 6,225 in 2004. Primarily as a result of this decline, our revenue and net income also decreased. Demand for our services stabilized from April 2003 through late 2003, and increased each quarter in 2004. We believe that this improvement in demand has been caused by a number of factors, including an increase in hospital admissions, legislation impacting healthcare staffing such as the California nurse-to-patient staffing ratios that went into effect in January 2004, signs of an improving economy and our increased focus on our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We are uncertain whether the increased demandalso compete with hospital systems that have developed their own recruitment departments and interim staffing pools to attract highly qualified healthcare professionals. We compete for our services will generate future growth in the average number of our temporarythese healthcare professionals on assignment. While this rise in demand is positivethe basis of customer service and creates opportunitiesexpertise, the quantity, diversity and quality of available assignments, compensation packages and, for growth, increases in the supply of newour temporary healthcare professional candidates has not grown at the same pace as demand.

We primarily draw our supply of temporarynurses and allied healthcare professionals, from national recruitment efforts through our targeted multi-brand recruitment strategy.the benefits that we provide to them while they are on assignment. We believe that sustained growth incompete with other staffing companies for hospital and healthcare facility orders will generate increasing interest and new recruiting opportunities in travel nursing. Recently, international supply channels have represented a small but growing supply source; however,clients on the basis of the quality of our ability to recruit healthcare professionals, through these foreign supply channels may be impacted by government legislation limiting the numbertimely availability of permanent immigrant visas that can be issued.our professionals with requisite skills, the quality, breadth and price of our services, our customer service, our recruitment expertise and the geographic reach of our services.

 

We believe that larger, national firms enjoy distinct competitive advantages over smaller, local and regional competitors in the healthcare staffing industry. More established firms have a larger pool of available candidates, substantial word-of-mouth referral networks and more recognizable brand names, enabling them to attract a consistent flow of new applicants. Larger firms also generally have a deeper, more comprehensive infrastructure with a more established business framework and processes that provide the foundation for national recognition, such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) staffing agency certification. The greater financial resources of these larger firms also make it relatively easier to provide payroll and housing services for its temporary healthcare professionals, which is cash flow intensive.

Some of our competitors in the temporary nurse and locum tenens staffing sector include Cross Country Healthcare, InteliStaf Healthcare, CHG Healthcare Services, Inc., On Assignment, and Medical Doctor Associates.

Demand and Supply Drivers

 

Demand Drivers

 

  Demographics and Advances in Medicine and Technology.    As the U.S. population ages and asmedical technology advances in medicine result in longer life expectancy, it is likely that chronic illnesses and hospital populations will continue to increase. We believe that these factors will increase the demand for both temporary and permanent nurses, as well as for allied healthhealthcare professionals. In addition, advances inenhanced healthcare technology havehas increased the demand for specialty physicians and nurses who are qualified to operate advanced medical equipment orand perform complex medical procedures.

Increased Hospital Revenue Opportunity.    Hospital and healthcare facilities’ primary revenue source is generated by physicians. By using permanent physician search and locum tenens services to fill vacancies quicker, hospitals and healthcare facilities can generate additional revenue. With more physicians on staff, healthcare facilities have a need for more nurses and allied healthcare professionals to support the increased patient census.

  Shift to Flexible Staffing Models.    Nurse wages comprise the largest percentage of hospitals’ labor expenses. Cost containment initiatives and a renewed focus on cost-effective healthcare service delivery continue tomay lead manymore hospitals and other healthcare facilities to adopt flexibleadjustable staffing models that include utilization of flexible staffing sources,resources such as traveling nurses.temporary healthcare professionals.

 

  Physician and Nursing Shortage.    Most regions of the United States are experiencing a pronounced shortage of physicians and registered nurses. In 2003,The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that the incremental job openings for physicians and surgeons from 2002 to 2012 will be 114,000, an increase of 19.5% over ten years. TheU.S. Department of Health and Human Services projected that up to 139,000 position vacancies would exist in 2004 for registered nurses, representing a shortage of approximately 7%. TheU.S. Department of Health and Human Services has also reported that the registered nurse workforce is expected to be 29% below projected requirements by 2020. Faced with increasing demand and tight supply for physicians and a shrinking supply of nurses, hospitals are utilizing more temporary physicians and nurses to meet staffing requirements. Factors contributing to the currentsupply shortage of healthcare professionals include:

Changes in Physician and Nurse Population.    Approximately 30% of all physicians are 55 years and older and approximately 38% are considering retirement in the next one to three years. The average age of a registered nurse was estimated to be 47 years old in 2004, an increase of 10.6% since 1996.

Shortage of Medical and Nursing Schools.    As a result of a shortage of qualified faculty and limited availability of medical and nursing schools to prospective healthcare professionals, the number of medical school and nursing school graduates is well below the number of new healthcare professionals needed in order to eliminate the projected declining supply of nurses include:shortage.

 

 Nurses Leaving Patient Care Environments for Less Stressful and More Flexible Careers.    Career opportunities for nurses have expanded beyond the traditional bedside role. Pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, HMOs and hospital service and supply companies increasingly offer nurses attractive positions which involve less demanding work schedules and physical requirements.more varied career progression and opportunity.

 

 Changes in Nurse Population.Physicians Leaving Practices Due to Increased Burdens of Malpractice Insurance and Medical Insurance Reimbursement.    The average age of a registered nurse was estimated to be 45.2 years old in 2000, an increase of 8.4% since 1988. By 2010, 40% ofPhysicians are increasingly concerned over reimbursement levels from insurance companies and government agencies and mounting claims billing restrictions and paperwork. In addition, malpractice premiums have been increasing over the nurse population is expected to be older than 50, as compared to 29% of nurses that were older than 50 in 2000. Although the number of first-time nursing school graduates who sat for the NCLEX examination has increased by 13% in both 2003 and 2004, we believe that the number of nurses taking the NCLEX examination is still well below the number of nurses needed in order to eliminate the projected long-term nursing shortage. It has been estimated that nursing school enrollments would need to increase by 40% annually to replace the nurses expected to leave the workforce through retirement.last several years.

  Seasonality.    Hospitals in regions that experience significant seasonal fluctuations in population, such as Florida or Arizona during the winter months, must be able to efficiently adjust their staffing levels to accommodate the change in patient census. Many of these hospitals utilize temporary healthcare professionals to satisfy these seasonal staffing needs.

Family and Medical Leave Act.    The adoption of the Family and Medical Leave Act in 1993, which mandates 12-week job-protected maternity and dependent care leave, continues to create temporary nursing vacancies at healthcare facilities. Approximately 94% of the registered nurses working at healthcare facilities in the United States are women.

 

  State Legislation Requiring Healthcare Facilities to Utilize More Nurses.    In response to concerns by nursing and consumer organizations over the quality of care provided in healthcare facilities and the increased workloads and pressures placed upon nurses, legislation has been introduced at both the federal and state level that is expected to increase the demand for nurses by requiring minimum nurse-to-patient ratios. Specifically, effective from January 2004, California hospitals have been required to staff units at government mandated nurse-to-patient ratios. Illinois and Rhode Island have introduced similar legislation. In addition, New Jersey has enacted legislation requiring hospitals to post daily staffing information including nurse-to-patient ratios for each unit and shift, and to provide this information upon request by a member of the public. Illinois, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Florida, New Jersey and Iowa have also introduced legislation for minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in various healthcare facilities to disclose to their patients their nurse-to-patient staffing ratios upon the patient’s request.settings.

 

Supply Drivers

 

  

Traditional Reasons for a Healthcare Professional to Work on a TravelTemporary Assignment.    TravelingTemporary staffing allows healthcare professionals to explore new areas of the United States, work at prestigious hospitals, learn

new skills, manage work/life balance, build their resumes, try out different clinical settings, allow for a transitional period between permanent jobs and avoid unwanted workplace politics that may accompany a permanent position. Other benefits to temporary healthcare professionals could include free or subsidized housing, competitive wages, professional liability insurance coverage, professional development opportunities, competitive wages, health and professional liability insurance and completion bonuses for some assignments. All of these opportunities have been constant supply drivers attracting a growing number ofwhich continue to attract new healthcare professionals into traveling.

our industry.

 

  Word-of-Mouth Referrals.    New applicants are often referred to travel staffing companies by currentother healthcare professionals who have taken temporary assignments with or former temporary healthcare professionals.been placed in a permanent position by the Company. Growth in the number of healthcare professionals thatwho are working on temporary assignments or have traveled,been placed in permanent positions by a staffing agency, as well as the increased number of hospital and healthcare facilities that utilize temporary healthcare professionals, creates more opportunities for referrals.

More Physicians Choosing Temporary Staffing Due to the Physician Shortage, Increased Reimbursement and Malpractice Concerns.    Locum tenens provides physicians the opportunity to practice medicine without concern for malpractice costs or having to worry about insurance reimbursement. In addition, the current and expected physician shortage allows physicians to practice medicine with confidence that they can explore other clinical settings and be secure about future permanent employment.

 

  More Nurses Choosing Traveling Due to the Nursing Shortage and Improving Economy.    In times of nursing shortages and an improving economy, nurses with permanent jobs generally feel more secure about their employment prospects. They have a higher degree of confidence that they can leave their permanent position to take a travel assignment and have the ability to return to a permanent position in the future. Additionally, during a nursing shortage, permanent staff nurses are often required to assume greater responsibility and patient loads, work overtime and deal with increased pressures within the hospital. ManyConsequently, many experienced nurses consequently choose to leave their permanent employer and look for a more flexible and rewarding position.

 

  New Legislation Allowing Nurses to Become More Mobile.    The Mutual Recognition Compact Legislation, promoted by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, allows nurses to work more freely within states participating in the Compact Legislation without obtaining new state licenses. The recognition legislation began in 1999 and has been passedenacted in 1920 states as of February 2005.2006.

Growth Strategy

 

Our goal is to expand our leadership position within the temporary healthcare staffing sector in the United States. The key components of our business strategy include:

 

  Strengthening and Expanding Our Relationships with Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities.    We continue to strengthen and expand our existing relationships with our hospital and healthcare facility clients and to develop new relationships. Hospitals and healthcare facilities are seeking a strong business partner for outsourcing and recruiting who can fulfill the quantity, breadth and quality of their staffing needs and help them develop strategies for the most cost-effective staffing methods. In addition, over the last twofew years, hospitals and healthcare facilities have shown an interest in working with a limited number of vendors to increase efficiency. We believe that our size and proven ability to fill our clients’ staffing needs provide us with the opportunity to serve our client facilities that implement this vendor consolidation strategy. To establish deeperIn addition, our recent acquisition of MHA has broadened the type of services we offer and more collaborative partnerships, we have expanded our client services and account management team over the last two years. This expansion allowswill allow us to better understand and serve the needs ofprovide a more comprehensive staffing solution to our hospital and healthcare facility clients. Furthermore, becauseBecause we possess one of the largest national networks of temporaryavailable physician, nurse and allied health professionals, we are well positioned to offer our hospital and healthcare facility clients a wide spectrum of effective solutions to meet their staffing needs.

 

  Expanding Our Network of Qualified Temporary Healthcare Professionals.    Through our recruiting efforts both in the United States and internationally, we continue to expand our network of qualified temporary healthcare professionals. We continue to build our supply of temporary healthcare professionals through referrals from our current and former temporary healthcare professionals who are currently working or have been placed by us in the past, as well as through advertising and internet sources. We have also conducted several research initiatives to assist us in segmenting the population of temporary healthcare professionals and developed targeted advertising campaigns directed at these different segments.

  Leveraging Our Business Model and Large Hospital and Healthcare Facility Client Base to Increase Productivity.    We seek to increase our productivity through our proven multi-brand recruiting strategy, large network of temporary healthcare professionals, established hospital and healthcare facility client relationships, proprietary information systems, innovative marketing and recruitment programs, training programs and centralized administrative support systems. Our multi-brand recruiting strategy for temporary nurses generally allows a recruiter in any of our nurse staffing brands to take advantage of all of our nationwide placement opportunities. In addition, our information systems and operational support and customer service personnel permit our recruiters to spend more time focused on temporarythe placement of our healthcare professionals’ needs and placing them on appropriate assignments in hospitals or healthcare facilities.professionals.

 

  Expanding Service Offerings Through New Staffing Solutions.    In order to further enhance the growth in our business and improve our competitive position in the healthcare staffing sector, we continue to exploreintroduce new service offerings. As our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ needs change, we constantly explore what additional services we can provide to better serve them. During 2005, we introduced NurseChoice In Demand to address hospitals’ urgent need for registered nurses and, through our clients.recent acquisition of MHA, we have significantly expanded and differentiated our service offerings by entering the physician staffing sector.

 

  Providing Innovative Technology.    We continue to be an innovation leader in healthcare staffing by providing on-line services and tools to both our hospital and healthcare facility clients and our healthcare professionals. Our on-line resource, Staffing Service Center, provides online resources for hospital and healthcare facility clients to help them streamline their communications and process flow for securingto secure and manage staffing services. We recently introduced our StaffingAnother on-line resource, The Traveler Service Center, provides an onlineon-line self-service resource for our healthcare professionals to track assignment information and tool to help our clients manage outsourced staffing more efficiently.complete key forms electronically. Both sites offer secure access and self-service features twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.

  Building the Strongest Management Team to Optimize Our Business Model.    In addition to a tenured senior sales and operations management team, we have increased ourcontinued to focus on training and professional development for all levels of management and have hired several additional experienced management members.members over the last few years. Our management team has been further broadened and strengthened through the addition of the MHA leadership team.

 

  Capitalizing on Strategic Acquisition Opportunities.    In order to enhance our competitive position, we will continue to selectively explore strategic acquisitions. After previous acquisitions, we have sought to leverage our hospital relationships and orders across our brands, integrate back-office functions and maintain brand differentiation for temporary healthcare professional recruitment purposes. We alsoWhile we intend to operate our recently acquired physician staffing businesses relatively separate from our nurse and allied businesses, we believe we have implementedopportunities to cross-sell our proven business model in ordercomprehensive staffing solution to achieve greater productivity, operating efficienciesour hospital and financial results.healthcare facility clients and integrate certain back-office functions.

 

Business Overview

 

Services Provided

 

Nurse and Allied Healthcare Staffing Segment

Hospitals and healthcare facilities generally obtain supplemental staffing for nurses and allied healthcare professionals from two external sources, local temporary (per diem) agencies and regional and national travel healthcare staffing companies. Per diem staffing which has historically comprised the majority of the temporary healthcare staffing industry, involves the placement of locally based healthcare professionals on daily (per diem) shift work on an as needed basis. Hospitals and healthcare facilities often give only a few hours notice of their per diem assignments, andwhich require a quick turnaround from their staffing agencies of generally less than 24 hours. Travel staffing, on the other hand, provideshas historically provided hospital and healthcare facilities with staffing solutions to address anticipated or longer-term staffing requirements, typically for 8, 13 or4 to 26 weeks. In contrast to per diem agencies, travel staffing companies select from a national (and in some cases international) skilled labor pool and provide pre-screened candidates to their hospital and healthcare facility clients, oftentypically at a lower cost. We focusHistorically, we have focused on the travel segment of the temporary healthcare staffing industry and provide bothfor our nurse and allied health temporary healthcare professionalsprofessionals. In addition, we have expanded our service offerings to our hospitalinclude assignment lengths of 2 weeks to 24 months placing both domestic and international healthcare facility clients.professionals.

 

Nurses.    We provide medical nurses, surgical nurses, specialty nurses, licensed practical or vocational nurses and advanced practice nurses in a wide range of specialties for travel assignments throughout the United States. We place our qualified nurse professionals with premier, nationally recognized hospitals and hospital

systems. The majority of our assignments are in acute-care hospitals, including teaching institutions, trauma centers and community hospitals. Nurses comprise approximately 93% of the total nurse and allied health temporary healthcare professionals currently working for us. We typically place the majority of our nurses on 13-week assignments.assignments with hospitals and healthcare facilities under our AMN Healthcare brand. We also offer a longer termlonger-term staffing solution under our O’Grady Peyton International brand, typically 18-months, with18 months, using our English speaking international nurses that we recruit primarily from English speakingforeign countries. During 2005, we launched a differentiated new service offering, NurseChoice InDemand, to address hospitals’ urgent need for registered nurses. NurseChoice InDemand is targeted to recruit and staff nurses who can begin assignments within one to two weeks in acute-care facilities in contrast to the three to five week lead time that may be required for travel nurses. Typical assignments are four to eight weeks and provide premium compensation packages to nurses.

 

Allied Health Professionals.    We also provide allied health professionals under our Med Travelers and Thera Tech Staffing brands to acute-care hospitals and other healthcare facilities such as skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation clinics and schools. Allied health professionals include such disciplines as physical therapists, surgical technologists, respiratory therapists, medical and radiology technologists, dialysis technicians, speech pathologists and rehabilitation assistants. Allied health professionals comprise approximately 7% of the total nurse and allied health temporary healthcare professionals currently working for us.

Physician Staffing Segment

Hospitals, physician groups and healthcare facilities generally obtain physicians from two sources, permanent hire and outsourced temporary physician staffing. We provide both temporary and permanent physician staffing services.

Locum Tenens.    We place physicians of all specialties on a temporary basis (locum tenens) under our Staff Care brand as independent contractors with all types of healthcare organizations throughout the United States, including hospitals, medical groups, occupational medical clinics, individual practitioners, networks, psychiatric facilities, government institutions, and managed care entities. Physicians are recruited nationwide and typically placed on multi-week contracts. While assignments can range from a few days up to one year, the average is 8 weeks in duration. The locum tenens business comprises approximately 84% of our total physician staffing segment based on revenue.

Permanent Placement.    We provide permanent physician placement services under our Merritt, Hawkins & Associates brand to medical facilities throughout the United States. Our broad specialty offerings include over 40 specialist and sub-specialist opportunities. Permanent physician placement comprises approximately 16% of our total physician staffing segment based on revenue.

 

Multi-Brand Recruiting

We recruit temporary healthcare professionals in the United States and internationally under each of our separate recruitment brand names: American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NursesRx, PreferredOffering Comprehensive Healthcare Staffing Thera Tech Staffing and O’Grady-Peyton International. While all of our brands have the capability to place temporary healthcare professionals on assignments using the same placement opportunities, we enhance our recruitment opportunities through our multiple brand strategy, as each has distinct geographic market strengths and brand reputation.

It is common for temporary healthcare professionals to register with more than one brand in order to utilize more than one recruiter. Our multi-brand recruiting strategy provides us with a competitive advantage, as potential temporary healthcare professionals are able to work with more than one of our brand recruiters. Accordingly, we believe that our probability of successfully placing the temporary healthcare professional on assignment is enhanced.Solutions

 

We employ a focused marketing strategy for our hospital and healthcare facility clients and market and administer the majority of our nursing services under the single corporate brand of AMN Healthcare. This combination of strategies providesOur physician, allied and international staffing services are marketed to our hospital and healthcare facility clients with the advantage of managing generally one contract with us, while receiving the benefit of several nationally known brands that recruit temporary healthcare professionals forunder their open positions.

respective brands.

The following chart depicts our singlecomprehensive healthcare staffing providercapabilities and multi-brand recruiting model:focus on critical staffing needs:

 

Multi-Brand RecruitingSingle Staffing Provider

 

National Presence and Diversified Hospital and Healthcare Facility Client Base

 

We offer our temporary healthcare professionals nationwide placement opportunities and provide temporary staffing solutions to our hospital and healthcare facility clients that are located throughout the United States. We typically have open temporary healthcare professional requests, or “orders,”generate revenue in all 50 states. TheDuring 2005, the largest percentages of these open orders areour revenue were concentrated in California, Arizona, California, Florida, New York, North Carolina and Ohio.Massachusetts. Our physician permanent placement market has

significant growth potential due to the increasing demand for physicians and the ability to cross-sell permanent placement services through our temporary service relationships. Our physician permanent placement brand, Merritt Hawkins & Associates has conducted over 30,000 physician search assignments since its founding and has worked in all 50 states.

 

The number of our hospital and healthcare facility clients with which we contract has grown from approximately 600 in 1993 to over 6,000 at the end of 2004. During 2004, at any given time, weWe had temporary healthcare professionals on assignment at approximately 1,000over 1,500 different healthcare facility clients. Over 95%clients at the end of 2005. The majority of our temporary healthcare professional assignments are at acute-care hospitals. In addition to acute-care hospitals, we also provide services to sub-acute healthcare facilities, physician groups, dialysis centers, clinics and schools. Our clients include hospitals and healthcare systems such as Georgetown University Hospital, HCA, NYU Medical Center, Stanford Health Care, UCLA Medical Center and The University of Chicago Hospitals. As of December 31, 2004, noNo single client including affiliated groups,healthcare system comprised more than 10% of our temporary healthcare professionals on assignmentrevenue and no single client facility comprised more than 3% of our temporary healthcare professionals on assignment.

revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Our Business Model

 

We have developed and continually refined our business model to achieve greater levels of productivity and efficiency. Our model is designed to optimize the communication with, and service to, both our temporary healthcare professionals and our hospital and healthcare facility clients.

 

The following graph illustrates the elements of our business model:

Marketing and Recruitment of New Temporary Healthcare Professionals

 

We believe that physician, nursing and allied health professionals are attracted to us because of our customer service and relationship-oriented approach, our competitive compensation and benefits package, and our large and diverse offering of work assignments that provide the opportunity to travel towork at numerous attractive locations throughout the United States.

We believe that our multi-brand recruiting strategy makes us more effective at reaching a larger number of temporary healthcare professionals. Because it is common for these healthcare professionals to register with more than one brand in the industry, we believe that by offering several distinct brands we increase our ability to recruit temporary healthcare professionals. Each brand has its own distinct identity to prospective temporary healthcare professionals, allowing us to segment the nursing population. We have conducted research to identify and categorize our temporary healthcare professionals into several categories, which allows us to market to specific nurses that meet the specific needs of our hospital clients. We market each brand through a combination of websites, journal advertising, conferences and conventions, direct mail, printed marketing material and through personal word-of-mouth referrals from current and former temporary healthcare professionals. We also operate NurseZone.com and RN.com, two leading nurse community websites. NurseZone.com caters to the professional and personal lives of nurses, offering nursing news and updates, links to other Internet sites, discounted products and services, continuing education courses and career opportunities sponsored by our recruitment brands, including an online temporary healthcare professional application process. RN.com offers online education opportunities for nurses, other online nurse related services and an online temporary healthcare

professional application process. In addition, we operate a variety of other websites, including Travelnursing.com and Nursingjobs.com. Our leading recruitment brands are featured on each website, and each website includes an easy and efficient online application process where temporary healthcare professionals can complete one application online and have it sent to each of the brands of their choice.

 

Screening, Licensing and Quality Management

 

Through our quality management department,and assurance departments, we screen all candidates prior to placement, and we continue to evaluate our temporary healthcare professionals after they are placed to ensure adequate performance and manage risk, as well as to determine feasibility for future placements. Our internal processes are designed to ensure that our temporary healthcare professionals have the appropriate experience, credentials and skills for the assignments that they accept. Our experience has shown us that well-matched placements result in satisfied temporary healthcare professionals and healthcare facility clients. Our screening and quality management process includes three principal stages:

Initial screening.    Each new temporary healthcare professional candidate who submits an application with us must meet certain criteria, including appropriate prior work experience and proper educational and licensing credentials. We independently verify each applicant’s work history and references to reasonably ensure that our hospital and healthcare facility clients may depend on our temporary healthcare professionals for clinical competency and personal reliability. Our proprietary clinical skills checklists, developed for each healthcare specialty area, are used by our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ hiring managers as a basis for evaluating candidates and conducting interviews, and for facilitating the selection of a temporary healthcare professional who can meet the hospital or healthcare facility client’s specific needs.

Assignment specific screening.    Once an assignment is accepted by a temporary healthcare professional, our quality management department tracks the necessary documentation and license verification required for the temporary healthcare professional to meet the requirements set forth by us, the hospital or healthcare facility and, when required, the applicable state board of health or nursing. Additionally, where state and federal laws apply with regard to the employment of healthcare workers, we have in place the necessary procedures to ensure compliance with material requirements. These requirements may include obtaining copies of specific health records, drug screening, criminal background checks and certain certifications or continuing education courses.

Ongoing evaluation.    We continually evaluate our temporary healthcare professionals’ performance through a verbal and written evaluation process. We receive these evaluations directly from our hospital and healthcare facility clients, and use the feedback to determine appropriate future assignments for each temporary healthcare professional.

 

Sales, Marketing and Account Management

 

We market our nursing services to hospitals and healthcare facilities generally under one corporate brand name, AMN Healthcare, a single staffing provider with several recruitment sources of temporary healthcare professionals: American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing, Thera Tech Staffing and O’Grady-Peyton International. Furthermore, weprofessionals. We utilize a team approach to servicingservice our hospital and healthcare facility clients. This team includes:includes the Regional Client Service Director, Hospital Account Manager, Quality Management, and Clinical Liaison. We market our temporary and permanent physician placement services under the brand names Staff Care, Inc. and Merritt, Hawkins and Associates, respectively. We have a large base of professionals marketing our physician staffing services to our clients who make thousands of client contacts each month.

 

Regional Client Service Director.    Our team of regional client service directors markets our services to prospective hospital and healthcare facility clients, and supervises ongoing contract management and business development of existing clients in each of their territories.

Hospital Account Manager.    Once our regional client service directors obtain hospital and healthcare facility contracts, our hospital account managers are responsible for soliciting and receiving orders from these

clients and working with our recruiters to fill those orders with qualified temporary healthcare professionals. An “order” is a request from a client hospital or healthcare facility for a temporary healthcare professional to fill an assignment. Depending upon their size and specific needs, one hospital or healthcare facility client may have from one to over 50 open orders at one time.

Because hospitals often list their orders with multiple service providers, open orders may also be listed with our competitors. An order will generally be filled by the company that provides a suitable candidate first, highlighting the need for a large network of temporary healthcare professionals and integrated operating and information systems to quickly and effectively match hospital and healthcare facility client needs with appropriate temporary healthcare professionals.

Quality Management.    Our quality management team ensures our temporary healthcare professionals are compliant with all contract quality requirements prior to starting an assignment.

Clinical Liaison.    We liaison with our hospital and healthcare facility clients and our temporary healthcare professionals on clinical issues. We continually evaluate our temporary healthcare professionals’ performance through a multi-stage verbal and written evaluation process.

Placement

 

OrdersFor the nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment, generally, orders are entered into our information network by our hospital account managers and are available to the recruiters at all of our recruitment brands. Our recruiters electronically provide our

The hospital account managers develop a relationship with the personnel profiles of the temporary healthcare professionals who have expressed an interest in a particular assignment. The hospital account manager follows up tofacility, arrange a telephone interviewinterviews between the temporary healthcare professional and the hospital, and confirmsconfirm offers and placements with the hospital or healthcare facility.

Our At the same time, our recruiters seek to develop and maintain strong and lasting relationships with our temporary healthcare professionals. Each recruiter manages a group of pre-screened temporary healthcare professionals and works to understand the unique needs and desires of each healthcare professional. The recruiter will present open order assignments to a temporary healthcare professional, request that the personnel profile be submitted for placement consideration, arrange a telephone interview with assistance from the hospital account managers, make any special requests for housing and generally facilitate each placement.

 

In the case of our international temporary healthcare professionals, the recruiters and placement coordinators at our O’Grady-PeytonO’Grady Peyton International brand, including those located in the United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa, assist candidates in preparing for the United States nursing examination and subsequently obtaining a U.S. nursing license. These recruiters and other staff also assist our international temporary healthcare professionals to obtain petitions to become lawful permanent residents prior to their arrival in the United States.

Throughout the typical 13-week assignment, the recruiters will work with the temporary healthcare professionals to review their progress and to determine whether the professionals would like to extend the length of the current assignment, or move to a new hospital or healthcare facility at the end of the assignment term. Our international temporary healthcare professionals are typically placed on longer-term, 18-month assignments as a result of our substantial investment in bringing them to work in the United States. Near completion of the 18-month assignment, our recruiters will work with these temporary healthcare professionals to explore their options for new assignments, including our more traditional 13-week arrangements.assignments.

 

We shareFor the physician staffing segment, orders amongfor temporary physicians or permanent placement requests are generated by our various brandsnational marketing team. Our national presence and infrastructure enable us to increase placementprovide physicians with a variety of attractive client locations, perquisites and opportunities for career development. Our recruiters and account representatives work together using proprietary information systems to fill orders and schedule physicians on temporary assignments. Our permanent placement recruiters work closely with our clients and marketing team to recruit and fill permanent placement requests. We also have the ability to cross-sell our permanent placement and temporary healthcare professionals. Our growth in placement volume has been driven by enablingservices to our recruiters at all of our brands to offer more open assignment orders to their temporary healthcare professionals.clients.

 

Housing and Support Services

 

We offer substantially all of our temporary healthcare professionals free or subsidized housing while on assignment. OurFor our nurse and allied placements, housing department is centralized and managed at our San Diego, California corporate

headquarters and an internally developed software system is used to manage rental properties, furniture vendors and other housing services. Our housing department facilitates the leasing of all apartments and furniture, manages utilities and arranges all housing and roommate assignments for the thousands of temporary healthcare professionals that we place each year. We generally offer our temporary healthcare professionals a free two-bedroom apartment to share with another temporary healthcare professional. If a temporary healthcare professional desires to have a private, one-bedroom apartment, they may pay a housing fee to us to cover the incremental costs. If a temporary healthcare professional chooses not to accept housing provided by us, they receive a monthly housing stipend in lieu of an apartment. Generally, our international temporary healthcare professionals are provided with increased travel reimbursements and assistance with immigration costs in lieu of free or subsidized housing. We currently lease over 3,100 apartments nationwide with a monthly housing expense of over $4.6 million.

Housing expenses are typically included in the hourly or weekly fees that we charge to our hospital and healthcare facility clients. Based on the contracted billing rate and gross profit for each hospital or healthcare facility client, we estimate a budget forFor our housing coordinators to utilize when locating apartments for each assignment. We carefully monitor performance of actuallocum tenens placements, housing costs incurred to the housing costs budgeted for each placement. If housing costs rise in a particular city or region, information is shared with client services to ensure that these increased costs are considered in the negotiation of bill rates.typically billed separately. We also negotiate contracts with national property management and furniture rental companies to leverage our size and obtain more favorable pricing and terms.

 

Temporary Healthcare Professional PayrollCompensation

 

During 2004,2005, approximately 94% of our working temporary healthcare professionalsprofessional employees were on our payroll,compensated directly by us, while approximately 6% were paid directly by the hospital or healthcare facility client. Providing payroll services is a value-added and convenient service that hospitals and healthcare facilities increasingly expect from their supplemental staffing sources. To provide convenience and flexibility to our hospital and healthcare facility clients, we accommodate several different payroll cycles and allow the client to choose the cycle that most closely matches that of their permanent staff. This enables our hospital and healthcare facility clients to integrate management of temporary healthcare professional scheduling and overtime with their permanent staff.

Consistent accuracy and timeliness of making payroll payments is essential to the retention of our temporary healthcare professionals. Our internal payroll service group currently receives and processes timesheets for approximately 6,000 temporary healthcare professionals. Payroll is typically processed within 72 hours after the completion of each pay period, heightening the importance of having adequately trained and skilled payroll personnel and appropriate operating and information systems. We process payroll in-house with our recently upgraded payroll and billing system, and outsource the printing, tax deposit and reporting functions to a national payroll processing service. This system provides a platform that will enable us to add enhanced features to better service our healthcare professionals in the future.

Our payroll service group offers our temporary healthcare professionals several service benefits, including multi-account direct deposit, automatic 401(k) deductions, dependent care and flexible spending account deductions, health insurance dependent premium deductions and housing co-pay deductions when the temporary healthcare professional chooses to upgrade their housing accommodation.

 

Temporary Healthcare Professional Benefits

 

In our effort to attract and retain highly qualified travelingtemporary healthcare professionals, we offer a variety of benefits to our temporary healthcare professionals.benefits. These benefits may include: travel reimbursement; group medical, dental and life insurance; referral bonuses; completion bonuses; 401(k) plan and dependent care and medical reimbursement; and free continuing education.

Travel Reimbursement.    Temporary healthcare professionals receive travel reimbursement for each assignment. Reimbursements typically are calculated on a “per mile” basis with a cap on the total, and are often billed as a separate cost to the hospital or healthcare facility client.

Group Medical, Dental and Life Insurance.    We provide medical, dental and life insurance.

Referral Bonuses.    Through our referral bonus program, a temporary healthcare professional is eligible for a bonus if he or she successfully refers a new temporary healthcare professional who works with us.

Completion Bonuses.    Some of our assignments offer special completion bonuses, which we pay in a lump sum once the temporary healthcare professional has completed his or her assignment. When offered, completion bonuses generally range from $250 to $3,000 for a 13-week assignment and are typically billed as a separate cost to the hospital or healthcare facility client.

401(k) Plan and Dependent Care and Medical Reimbursement.    We offer immediate enrollment in our 401(k) plan, including matching employer contributions after 1,000 hours of continued service. In addition, we provide pre-tax deductions for employee dependent care expenses and a medical spending account.

Individual Professional Liability Insurance.    We provide our temporary healthcare professionals with individual professional liability insurance policies.

Free Continuing Education.    We are a fully accredited provider of continuing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center. Through our professional development center and RN.com, our temporary healthcare professionals receive free continuing education courses and seminars. In addition, they can obtain the information needed to apply for licensure in the state where they will travel.

 

Hospital Billing

 

To accommodate the needs of our hospital clients, for temporary healthcare professional staffing, we offer two types of billing: payrollhours and days worked contracts and flat ratefee contracts. During 2004,2005, we billed approximately 94% of working temporarynurse and allied healthcare professionals based on payrollhours and days worked contracts and approximately 6% based on flat rate contracts, and we billed substantially all of the working temporary physicians based on hours and days worked contracts.

PayrollHours and Days Worked Contracts.    Under a payroll contract,hours and days worked contracts, the temporary healthcare professional is either our employee for payroll and benefits purposes.purposes or an independent contractor paid directly by us on behalf of the hospital and healthcare facility clients. Under this arrangement, we bill our hospital and healthcare facility clients at an hourly or daily rate that effectively includes reimbursement for recruitment fees, wagescompensation and benefits for the temporary healthcare professional and any applicable employer taxes and housing expenses.taxes. Housing or travel expenses are either included in the rate or billed separately. Overtime, shift differential and holiday hours worked are typically billed at a premium rate. In turn, we pay the temporary healthcare professional’s wages or contracted fees, housing and travel costs and benefits. Providing payroll services is a value-added and convenient service that hospitals and healthcare facilities increasinglygenerally expect from their supplemental staffing sources. Providing these payroll services, which is cash flow intensive, also gives us a competitive edge over smaller staffing firms.

 

Flat Rate Contracts.    With flat rate billing,contracts, the temporary healthcare professional is placed oncompensated directly by the hospital or healthcare facility client’s payroll.facility. We bill the hospital a “flat” weekly rate that includes reimbursement for recruitment fees, temporary healthcare professional benefits and typically housing expenses.expenses, which may be billed separately.

 

Information Systems

 

Our primary management information and communications systems are centralized and controlled in our corporate headquarters in San Diego, CA for nursing and are utilized in each of our staffing offices.the MHA headquarters in Irving, TX for physicians. Our financial and payroll systems are centralized at our corporatethese headquarters and our operational reporting is standardized at all of our offices.

 

During the past several years, weWe have developed aand currently operate proprietary information system called American Mobile Information Exchange, or “AMIE.” AMIE is a Windows-based, interactive systemsystems that is an important tool in

maximizing our productivity and accommodating our multi-brand recruiting strategy. The system was custom-designed for our business model, includinginclude integrated processes for temporary healthcare professional and healthcare facility contract management, matching of temporary healthcare professionals to availablewith clients and assignments, temporary healthcare professional file submissions for placements, quality management tracking, controlling compensation packages and managing healthcare facility contract and billing terms. AMIE providesThese systems provide our staff with fast, detailed information regarding individual temporary healthcare professionals and hospital and healthcare facility clients. AMIE also provides a platform for interacting and transacting with temporary healthcare professionals and hospital and healthcare facility clients via the Internet.

 

Risk Management

 

We have developed an integrated risk management program that focuses on loss analysis, education and assessment in an effort to reduce our operational costs and risk exposure. We periodicallyregularly analyze our losses on professional liability claims and workers compensation claims to identify trends. This allows us to focus our resources on those areas that may have the greatest impact on us and adjust our sales and operational approach to these areas. We have also developed educational materials for distribution to our temporary healthcare professionals that are targeted to address specific work-injury risks and documentation of clinical events. In addition, we have compiled a universal safety manual that every temporary healthcare professional receives each year.

 

In addition to our proactive measures, we engage in a peer review process of any incidents involving our temporary nurses and allied healthcare professionals. Upon notification of a temporarynurse or allied healthcare professional’s involvement in an incident that may result in liability for us, aour corporate team of registered nurses reviews the temporary healthcare professional’s actions. Our peer review committee makes a prompt determination regarding whether the temporary healthcare professional will continue the assignment and whether we will place the temporary healthcare professionalhim/her on future assignments.

Competition

The healthcare staffing industry is highly competitive. We compete in national, regional and local markets with full-service staffing companies, specialized temporary staffing agencies and hospital systems that have developed their own interim staffing pools. We compete with other staffing firms to attract nurses and other healthcare professionals as temporary healthcare professionals and to attract hospital and healthcare facility clients. We compete for temporary healthcare professionalsalso rely on the basis of customer service and expertise, the quantity, diversity and quality of assignments available, compensation packages, and the benefits that we provide to a temporary healthcare professional while they are on an assignment. We compete forour hospital and healthcare facility clients on the basis of the quality of our temporary healthcare professionals, the timely availability of our professionals with requisite skills, the quality, scope and price of our services, our customer service, our recruitment expertise and the geographic reachstate professional associations’ investigation of our services.

We believe that larger, nationally established firms enjoy distinct competitive advantages over smaller, localincidents in determining continued and regional competitors in the travel healthcare staffing industry. More established firms have a large pool of available nursing candidates, substantial word-of-mouth referral networks and established brand names, enabling them to attract a consistent flow of new applicants. Larger firms generally have a deeper, more comprehensive infrastructure and can also more easily provide payroll services, which are cash flow intensive.

Some of our larger competitors in the temporary healthcare staffing sector include Cross Country, InteliStaf/StarMed, CompHealth Group/RN Network, Medical Staffing Network and On Assignment.future assignments.

 

Regulation

 

The healthcare industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state laws and regulations related to professional licensure, conduct of operations, payment for services and payment for referrals. Our business,

however, is not directly impacted by or subject to the extensive and complex laws and regulations that generally

govern the healthcare industry. The laws and regulations that are applicable to our hospital and healthcare facility clients could indirectly impact our business to a certain extent, but because we provide services on a contract basis and are paid directly by our hospital and healthcare facility clients, we do not have any direct Medicare or managed care reimbursement risk.

 

Some states require state licensure for businesses that employ, assign and/or assignplace healthcare personnel to provide healthcare services at hospitals and other healthcare facilities. We are currently licensed in all twelve states that require such licenses and take measures to ensure compliance with all material state licensure requirements. In addition, the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) recently instituted a certification program for healthcare staffing agencies. We will be undergoingwe received our JCAHO certification inspectionCorporate Certification for AMN Healthcare and the nurse and allied brands of American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing and Thera Tech Staffing based on a review of our compliance with national standards during the second quarter of 2005. We were the first healthcare staffing firm in the country to receive the prestigious JCAHO Certification as a corporate system with multiple staffing sites.

 

Most of the temporary healthcare professionals that we employ or independently contract with are required to be individually licensed or certified under applicable state laws. We take prudent steps to ensure that our employeeshealthcare professionals possess all necessary licenses and certifications in all material respects.certifications.

 

We recruit some temporary healthcare professionalsnurses from Canada for placement in the United States. Canadian healthcare professionalsnurses can come to the United States on TN Visas under the North American Free Trade Agreement. TN Visas are renewable, one-year temporary work visas, which generally allow entrance into the United States provided the healthcare professionalnurse presents at the border proof of waiting employment in the United States, evidence of the necessary healthcare practice licenses and in some instances, a visa credentials assessment from the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools.

 

With respect to our recruitment of international temporary healthcare professionals through our O’Grady-PeytonO’Grady Peyton International brand, we must comply with certain United States immigration law requirements, including the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. We primarily bring temporary healthcare professionals to the United States as immigrants, or lawful permanent residents (commonly referred to as “green card” holders). We screen foreign temporary healthcare professionals and assist them in preparing for the national nursing examination and subsequently obtaining a U.S. nursing license. We file petitions with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service for a temporary healthcare professional to become a permanent resident of the United States or obtain necessary work visas. Generally, such petitions are accompanied by proof that the temporary healthcare professional has either passed the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools Examination or holds a full and unrestricted state license to practice professional nursing, as well as a contract between us and the temporary healthcare professional demonstrating that there is a bona fide job offer.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had 885approximately 1,700 corporate employees. We believe that our employee relations are good. The following chart shows our number of corporate employees by department:

Recruitment

229

Regional Directors and Hospital Account Managers

81

Housing, Quality Management and Traveler Services

248

Accounting and Payroll

132

MIS, Support Services, HR, Marketing and Facilities Staff

163

Corporate and Subsidiary Management

32

Total Corporate Employees

885

During the fourth quarter of 2004,2005, we had an average of over 6,200 temporary6,500 nurse and allied healthcare professionals working on assignment.

Since our acquisition of MHA on November 2, 2005 through December 31, 2005, days filled by our physician independent contractors totaled 29,570. Days filled is calculated by dividing the physician independent contractor hours filled during the period by 8 hours.

Additional Information

 

We maintain a corporate website at www.amnhealthcare.com/investors. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports, are made available, free of charge, through this website as soon as reasonably practicable after being filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating us and the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our company, operating results, financial condition and the actual outcome of matters as to which forward- looking statements are made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in “Risk Factors” constitute “forward-looking statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors and uncertainties set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

If we are unable to continue to recruit and retain healthcare professionals for our healthcare staffing business at reasonable costs, it could increase our operating costs and negatively impact our business.

We rely significantly on our ability to recruit and retain healthcare professionals who possess the skills, experience and licenses necessary to meet the requirements of our hospital, healthcare facility clients and physician practice groups. We compete for healthcare staffing personnel with other temporary healthcare staffing companies and with hospitals, healthcare facilities and physician practice groups based on the quantity, diversity and quality of assignments offered, compensation packages and the benefits that we provide to our healthcare professionals. We rely on our human capital intensive, relationship-oriented approach and national infrastructure to enable us to compete in the permanent physician staffing business. We must continually evaluate and expand our temporary and permanent healthcare professional network to keep pace with the needs of our hospital, healthcare facility clients and physician practice groups.

Currently, there is a shortage of qualified nurses, physicians and certain allied healthcare professionals in the United States, significant competition exists for these personnel, and salaries and benefits have risen. We may be unable to continue to increase the number of temporary and permanent healthcare professionals that we recruit, decreasing the potential for growth of our business. Our ability to recruit and retain temporary and permanent healthcare professionals depends on several factors, including our ability to provide our healthcare professionals with assignments and placements that they view as attractive and to provide our temporary healthcare professionals with competitive wages and benefits, including health insurance and housing. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in any of these areas as the costs of attracting healthcare professionals and providing them with attractive benefit packages may be higher than we anticipate, or we may be unable to pass these costs on to our hospital and healthcare facility clients. If we are unable to increase the rates that we charge our hospital and healthcare facility clients to cover these costs, our profitability could decline. Moreover, if we are unable to recruit temporary and permanent healthcare professionals, the quality of our services to our hospital and healthcare facility clients may decline and, as a result, we could lose clients.

Our operations may deteriorate if we are unable to continue to attract, develop and retain our sales and operations personnel.

Our success is dependent upon the performance of our sales and operations personnel. The number of individuals who meet our qualifications for these positions is limited, and we may experience difficulty in attracting qualified candidates. In addition, we commit substantial resources to the training, development and support of our personnel. Competition for qualified sales personnel in the line of business in which we operate is strong, and there is a risk that we may not be able to retain our sales personnel after we have expended the time and expense to recruit and train them.

We operate in a highly competitive market and our success depends on our ability to remain competitive in obtaining and retaining hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients and demonstrating the value of our services.

The temporary healthcare staffing business is highly competitive. We compete in national, regional and local markets with full-service staffing companies, specialized temporary staffing agencies and hospital systems that have developed their own interim staffing pools. Some of our large competitors in the temporary nurse and locum tenens staffing sectors include Cross Country Healthcare, InteliStaf Healthcare, CHG Healthcare Services, Inc., On Assignment, and Medical Doctor Associates.

We believe that the primary competitive factors in obtaining and retaining hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients are identifying qualified healthcare professionals for specific job requirements, providing qualified employees in a timely manner, pricing services competitively and effectively monitoring employees’ job performance. Competition for hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients and temporary and permanent healthcare professionals may increase in the future due to these factors or a shortage of qualified healthcare professionals in the marketplace and, as a result, we may not be able to remain competitive. To the extent competitors seek to gain or retain market share by reducing prices or increasing marketing expenditures, we could lose revenue or clients and our margins could decline, which could seriously harm our operating results and cause the price of our stock to decline. In addition, the development of alternative recruitment channels could lead our clients to bypass our services, which would also cause revenue and margins to decline.

Our business depends upon our ability to secure and fill new orders from our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients because our temporary healthcare staffing business does not have long-term, exclusive or guaranteed contracts with them, and economic conditions may adversely impact the number of new orders and contracts we receive.

We generally do not have long-term, exclusive or guaranteed order contracts for temporary healthcare staffing with our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients. The success of our business is dependent upon our ability to continually secure new contracts and orders from hospitals, healthcare facilities and physician practice groups and to fill those orders with our temporary healthcare professionals. Our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients are free to award contracts and place orders with our competitors and choose to use temporary healthcare professionals that our competitors offer them. Therefore, we must maintain positive relationships with our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients. If we fail to maintain positive relationships with our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients or are unable to provide a cost-effective staffing solution, we may be unable to generate new temporary healthcare professional orders and our business may be adversely affected.

Some hospitals and healthcare facility clients choose to outsource this contract and order function to staffing associations owned by member healthcare facilities or companies with vendor management services that may act as intermediaries with our client facilities. These organizations may impact our ability to obtain new clients and maintain our existing client relationships by impeding our ability to access and contract directly with healthcare facility clients. Additionally, we may experience pricing pressure or incremental fees from these organizations that may negatively impact our revenue and profitability.

Depressed economic conditions, such as increasing unemployment rates and low job growth, could also negatively influence our ability to secure new orders and contracts from clients. In times of economic downturn, permanent healthcare facility staff may be more inclined to work overtime and less likely to leave their positions, resulting in fewer available vacancies and less demand for our services. Fewer placement opportunities for our temporary healthcare professionals impairs our ability to recruit and place both temporary and permanent placement healthcare professionals and our revenues and profitability may decline as a result of this constricted demand and supply.

The demand for our services, and therefore the profitability of our business, may be adversely affected by changes in the staffing needs due to fluctuations in hospital admissions or staffing preferences of our healthcare facility clients.

The temporary healthcare staffing industry grew from 1996 through 2002, declined in early 2003 and stabilized and grew modestly from late 2003 through 2005. Demand for our temporary healthcare staffing services is affected by the staffing needs and preferences of our healthcare facility clients, as well as by fluctuations in patient occupancy at our client healthcare facilities due to economic factors and seasonal fluctuations that are beyond our control.

Hospitals in certain geographical regions experience significant seasonal fluctuations in admissions, and must be able to adjust their staffing levels to accommodate the change in patient census. Our healthcare facility clients may choose to use temporary staff, additional overtime from their permanent staff or add new permanent staff in order to accommodate changes in their staffing needs. Many healthcare facilities will utilize temporary healthcare professionals to accommodate an increase in hospital admissions. Alternatively, if hospital admissions decrease, the demand for our temporary healthcare professionals may decline as healthcare facility clients typically will reduce their use of temporary staff before reducing the workload or undertaking layoffs of their regular employees. In addition, we may experience more competitive pricing pressure during periods of patient occupancy and hospital admission downturns, negatively impacting our revenue and profitability.

The ability of our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients to retain and increase the productivity of their permanent staff may affect the demand for our services.

If our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients retain and increase the productivity of their permanent staff, their need for our services may decline. Higher permanent staff retention rates and increased productivity of permanent staff members could result in increased efficiencies, thereby reducing the demand for both our temporary staffing and permanent placement services, which could negatively impact our revenue and profitability.

We operate in a regulated industry and changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce revenue and profitability and may impact our ability to grow and operate our business.

The healthcare industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state laws and regulations related to professional licensure, conduct of operations, costs and payment for services and payment for referrals.

Our business is generally not subject to the extensive and complex laws that apply to our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients, including laws related to Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. However, these laws and regulations could indirectly affect the demand or the prices paid for our services. For example, our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients could suffer civil and criminal penalties and be excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other healthcare programs if they fail to comply with the laws and regulations applicable to their businesses.

In addition, our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients could receive reduced reimbursements, or be excluded from coverage, because of a change in the rates or conditions set by federal or state governments. In turn, violations of or changes to these laws and regulations that adversely affect our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients could also adversely affect the prices and demand for our services. For example, legislation in Massachusetts limited the hourly rate paid to temporary nursing agencies for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and certified nurses aides. While we are exempt from this regulation, in part, similar regulations may be enacted in other states in which we operate, and as a result revenue and margins could decrease. Furthermore, third party payers, such as health maintenance organizations, increasingly challenge the prices charged for medical care. Failure by hospitals, healthcare

facilities and physician practice groups to obtain full reimbursement from those third party payers could reduce the demand or the price paid for our services.

We are also subject to certain laws and regulations applicable to healthcare staffing agencies and general temporary staffing services. Like all employers, we must also comply with various laws and regulations relating to pay practices, workers compensation and immigration. As we continue to grow, we believe that we are more likely to be a target of challenges to our pay practices, such as challenges to our employee classifications under the Fair Labor Standards Act. There is a risk that we could be subject to payment of additional wages, insurance and employment and payroll related taxes if certain of our corporate employees classified as exempt from overtime and minimum wage requirements are re-classified as non-exempt from overtime and minimum wage requirements. Because of the nature of our business, the impact of these laws and regulations may have a more pronounced effect on our business. These laws and regulations may also impede our ability to grow our operations.

We primarily draw our supply of healthcare professionals from the United States, but international supply channels have represented a small but growing temporary nurse supply source. Our ability to recruit healthcare professionals through these foreign supply channels may be impacted by government legislation limiting the number of immigrant visas that can be issued.

Additionally, we have incurred and will continue to incur additional legal and accounting expenses related to compliance with corporate governance and disclosure standards implemented by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulations promulgated in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require an annual and quarterly review by management and evaluation of our internal control systems, in addition to an annual auditor attestation of the effectiveness of these systems, which commenced with our fiscal year ended on December 31, 2004 (exclusive of our recent acquisition of The MHA Group, Inc.). In addition, as of December 31, 2006, we will need to certify the sufficiency of the internal control systems of MHA. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, damages, civil and criminal penalties, injunctions and cease and desist orders may be imposed, which would negatively impact our business and operations. The increase in costs necessitated by compliance with the laws and regulations affecting our business reduces our overall profitability, and reduces the assets and resources available for utilization in the expansion of our business operations.

Our profitability is impacted by our ability to leverage our cost structure.

We have technology, operations and human capital infrastructures to support our existing business and contemplated growth. In the event that our business does not grow at the rate that we had anticipatedItem 2.,    Properties our inability to reduce these costs would impair our profitability. Additionally, if we are not able to capitalize on this infrastructure our earnings growth rate will be impacted.

The variation in pricing of the healthcare facility contracts under which we place temporary and permanent healthcare professionals impacts our profitability.

The pricing of our contracts with hospitals, healthcare facilities and physician practice groups may vary depending on circumstances, including geographic location, economic conditions and supply and demand factors. These pricing variables impact our gross margin and could result in decreased profitability if we are unable to renew existing accounts on economically favorable terms.

We may not be able to successfully implement our strategic growth, acquisition and integration strategies.

An effective growth management strategy is necessary to organically grow our current operations, and if we do not successfully execute on this growth strategy, our profitability could decline. We continue to explore strategic acquisition opportunities to supplement our organic growth strategy. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including difficulties integrating acquired personnel and other corporate cultures into our business, the potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies, the assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies and the diversion of management attention from existing operations. We may not be able to fully integrate the operations of the acquired businesses with our own in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Acquisitions may also require significant expenditures of cash and other resources and assumption of debt that may ultimately negatively impact our overall financial performance. In particular, we are still in the process of integrating our recent MHA acquisition.

Difficulties in maintaining our management information and communications systems may result in increased costs that reduce our profitability.

Our ability to deliver our staffing services to our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients and manage our internal systems depends to a large extent upon our access to and the performance of our management information and communications systems. These systems also maintain accounting and financial information, which we depend upon to fulfill our financial reporting obligations. If these systems do not adequately support our operations, these systems are damaged or if we are required to incur significant additional costs to repair, maintain or expand these systems, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected. Although we have risk mitigation measures, these systems, and our access to these systems, are not impervious to floods, fire, storms, or other natural disasters, and the loss of systems information could result in disruption to our business.

The challenge to the classification of certain of our healthcare professionals as independent contractors could adversely impact our profitability.

Although there is a long-standing industry standard to treat physicians as independent contractors, there is a risk we could be subject to additional wage and insurance claims, employment and payroll-related taxes if federal or state taxing authorities re-classify our independent contractor physicians as employees, which would significantly reduce our profitability. In addition, many states have laws which prohibit non-physician owned companies from employing physicians which we refer to as the “corporate practice of medicine.” If our independent contractor physicians are classified as employees, we would be in violation of state laws that prohibit the corporate practice of medicine, which would have a substantial negative impact on our profitability.

The impact of medical malpractice and other claims asserted against us could subject us to substantial liabilities.

In recent years, our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients are subject to a number of legal actions alleging malpractice or related legal theories. Because our temporary and permanent healthcare professionals provide medical care and we provide credentialing of these healthcare professionals, claims may be brought against us and our healthcare professionals relating to the recruitment and qualification of these healthcare professionals and the quality of medical care provided by our temporary healthcare professionals while on assignment or after placement at our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients. We and the healthcare professional are at times named in these lawsuits regardless of our contractual obligations, the competency of the healthcare professional, the standard of care provided by the healthcare professional or the quality of service that we provided. In some instances, we are required to indemnify hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients contractually against some or all of these potential legal actions. Also, because some of our temporary healthcare professionals are our employees, we may be subject to various employment claims and contractual disputes regarding the terms of a temporary healthcare professional’s employment.

Because we are in the business of placing our temporary healthcare professionals in the workplaces of other companies, we are subject to possible claims by our temporary healthcare professionals alleging discrimination, sexual harassment and other similar activities by our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We maintain a policy for employment practices coverage. However, the cost of defending such claims, even if groundless, could be substantial and the associated negative publicity could adversely affect our ability to attract, retain and place qualified individuals in the future.

We maintain various types of insurance coverage, including professional liability, workers compensation and employment practices, through insurance carriers, and we also self-insure for these claims through accruals for retention reserves. We may experience increased insurance costs and reserve accruals and may not be able to pass on all or any portion of increased insurance costs to our hospital, healthcare facility and physician practice group clients, thereby reducing our profitability. Our insurance coverage and reserve accruals may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us, and we may be exposed to substantial liabilities.

Terrorist threats or attacks may disrupt or adversely affect our business operations.

Our business operations may be interrupted or adversely impacted in the United States and abroad in the event of a terrorist attack or heightened security alerts. Our temporary healthcare professionals may become reluctant to travel and may decline assignments based upon the perceived risk of terrorist activity, which would reduce our revenue and profitability. In addition, terrorist activity or threats may impede our access to our management and information systems resulting in loss of revenue. We do not maintain insurance coverage against terrorist attacks.

If we are unable to carry out our business strategy our profitability could be negatively impacted.

Our success is dependent on our ability to execute our business strategy, which necessarily involves the successful operation of a number of integral components and business objectives. Our ability to execute these business objectives is dependent upon a sufficient cash flow and capital structure to support the business. If we are unable to access credit on commercially reasonable terms or our cash flow is significantly impaired, our profitability could be negatively impacted.

The loss of key officers and management personnel could adversely affect our ability to remain competitive.

 

We believe that the success of our propertiesbusiness strategy and our ability to operate profitably depends on the continued employment of our senior management team. We have employment agreements only with Steven C. Francis, our Executive Chairman, Susan R. Nowakowski, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and two non-executive officers. If these individuals or members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet that may have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in the event that we are required to recognize an impairment to goodwill.

As of December 31, 2005, we had $240.8 million of unamortized goodwill on our balance sheet, which represents the excess of the total purchase price of our acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets acquired. At December 31, 2005, goodwill represented 38.9% of our total assets.

SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets requires that goodwill not be amortized but rather that it be reviewed annually for impairment. In the event impairment is identified, a charge to earnings would be recorded. Although an impairment charge to earnings for goodwill would not affect our cash flow, it would

decrease our earnings or increase our losses, as the case may be, and our stock price could be adversely affected. We have reviewed our goodwill for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, and have not identified any impairment to goodwill.

We have a substantial accrual for self-insured retentions on our balance sheet, and any significant adverse adjustments in these accruals may have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses.

We maintain accruals for self-insured retentions for professional liability, health insurance and workers compensation on our balance sheet. Increases to these accruals do not immediately affect our cash flow, but a significant increase to these self-insured retention accruals may decrease our earnings or increase our losses, as the case may be. We determine the adequacy of our self-insured retention accruals by evaluating our historical experience and trends, related to both insurance claims and payments, information provided to us by our insurance brokers and third party administrators, as well as industry experience and trends. If such information indicates that our accruals are overstated or understated, we reduce or provide for additional accruals, as appropriate.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.Properties

We believe that our leased space is adequate for our current needs. In addition, we believe that adequate space can be obtained to meet our foreseeable business needs. We currently occupy office space in eleven locations,In accordance with, and as required by, the terms of our New Credit Agreement, we have pledged substantially all of our assets and properties to our lenders under our New Credit Agreement to secure our obligations thereunder. Our principal leases as of December 31, 2005 are identified in the chart below:

 

Location


  Square Feet

San Diego, California (corporate headquarters)

  175,672

Westminster, ColoradoIrving, Texas

  29,152125,909

Huntersville, North Carolina

  25,96730,870

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

  25,408

Westminster, Colorado

19,427

Salt Lake City, Utah

13,347

Atlanta, Georgia

13,302

Irvine, California

6,165

Savannah, Georgia

  5,6564,780

London (United Kingdom)

3,391

Sydney (Australia)

  2,788

London (United Kingdom)

2,691

Birmingham (United Kingdom)

  2,368

Cape Town (South Africa)

598

Perth (Australia)

415

Singapore

113

Total

270,828

2,300

 

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

 

We are subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. Some of these matters include professional liability, tax, payroll and employee-related matters and inquiries and investigations by governmental agencies regarding our employment practices. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Our hospital and healthcare facility clients may also become subject to claims, governmental inquiries and investigations and legal actions to which we may become a party relating to services provided by our professionals. From time to time, and depending upon the particular facts and circumstances, we may be subject to indemnification obligations under our contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients relating to these matters. At this time, we are not aware of any such pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

 

Item 4.Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of

Equity Securities

Our common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AHS” since our initial public offering on November 13, 2001. Prior to that time, there was no public trading market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

   High

  Low

Year Ended December 31, 2003

        

First Quarter

  $18.95  $9.25

Second Quarter

  $13.09  $8.90

Third Quarter

  $17.10  $12.20

Fourth Quarter

  $17.36  $13.70

Year Ended December 31, 2004

        

First Quarter

  $21.56  $17.00

Second Quarter

  $18.58  $14.49

Third Quarter

  $15.35  $11.26

Fourth Quarter

  $16.66  $10.70

As of March 8, 2005, there were 28,344,162 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding that were held by 13 stockholders of record. There were no sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2004. On March 10, 2005, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $14.72

Our common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AHS” since our initial public offering on November 13, 2001. Prior to that time, there was no public trading market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

   Sales Price

   High

  Low

Year Ended December 31, 2004

        

First Quarter

  $21.56  $17.00

Second Quarter

  $18.58  $14.49

Third Quarter

  $15.35  $11.26

Fourth Quarter

  $16.66  $10.70

Year Ended December 31, 2005

        

First Quarter

  $16.85  $12.85

Second Quarter

  $16.55  $13.62

Third Quarter

  $17.46  $14.85

Fourth Quarter

  $20.73  $14.73

We completed secondary offerings of our common stock for 2,300,000 and 10,631,303 shares on April 18, 2005 and May 27, 2005, respectively. All of the 12,931,303 shares were sold by affiliates of Haas Wheat & Partners, L.P. (the “HWP Stockholders”), a private equity investment firm whose affiliates had owned shares of the company since 1999. We incurred issuance costs associated with the offerings of approximately $0.5 million during the second quarter of 2005, which were recorded in the Company’s stockholders’ equity.

As of March 9, 2006, there were 32,130,241 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding that were held by 27 stockholders of record. On March 9, 2006, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $19.49 per share.

On November 2, 2005, we issued 2.3 million shares of common stock in connection with our acquisition of MHA, and we issued an additional 0.7 million shares on March 9, 2006 for payment of earn-out amounts as provided in the acquisition agreement. The issuance is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof and Regulation D promulgated thereunder (“Regulation D”), based upon representations that the Company has obtained from each MHA shareholder receiving such shares, including that such shareholder is an “accredited investor” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D. Concurrently with the filing of this Form 10-K, on March 10, 2006, we will file a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the 2.3 million shares of common stock in connection with our acquisition of MHA and the additional 0.7 million shares for payment of the earn-out amounts as provided in the acquisition agreement.

 

We have not paid any dividends in the past and currently do not expect to pay cash dividends or make any other distributions in the future. We expect to retain our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our board deems relevant. In addition, our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock is subject to covenants in our credit facility. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Additional information regarding our stock option plans and plan activity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is provided in our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9. Stockholders’ Equity” and is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information at December 31, 2005” to be distributed in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 12, 2006.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

 

The selected financial and operating data presented below should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are derived from our audited financial statements that do not appear herein. Because of our acquisition of MHA in November 2005 and the consolidated statement of operations for year ended 2005 only include the result of operations of MHA since the date of acquisition, our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations to be expected in the future.

   Years Ended December 31,

 
   2005

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

 
   (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) 

Consolidated Statements of Operations:

                     

Revenue

  $705,843  $629,016  $714,209  $775,683  $517,794 

Cost of revenue

   535,608   484,654   552,052   586,900   388,284 
   

  

  

  


 


Gross profit

   170,235   144,362   162,157   188,783   129,510 
   

  

  

  


 


Operating expenses:

                     

Selling, general and administrative, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation

   117,184   101,436   92,500   97,666   71,483 

Non-cash stock-based compensation(1)

   142   750   874   874   31,881 

Depreciation and amortization

   6,179   5,837   4,819   3,839   7,713 

Transaction costs(2)

   —     —     —     139   1,955 
   

  

  

  


 


Total operating expenses

   123,505   108,023   98,193   102,518   113,032 
   

  

  

  


 


Income from operations

   46,730   36,339   63,964   86,265   16,478 

Other expense (income), net:

                     

Interest expense (income), net

   9,565   8,440   2,303   (343)  13,933 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   —     —     —     —     8,265 
   

  

  

  


 


Total other expense (income), net

   9,565   8,440   2,303   (343)  22,198 
   

  

  

  


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

   37,165   27,899   61,661   86,608   (5,720)

Income tax expense (benefit)

   14,931   10,553   23,869   34,252   (1,334)
   

  

  

  


 


Net income (loss)

  $22,234  $17,346  $37,792  $52,356  $(4,386)
   

  

  

  


 


Net income (loss) per common share:

                     

Basic

  $0.76  $0.61  $1.04  $1.23  $(0.14)
   

  

  

  


 


Diluted

  $0.69  $0.55  $0.95  $1.12  $(0.14)
   

  

  

  


 


Weighted average common shares outstanding:

                     

Basic

   29,130   28,248   36,456   42,534   30,641 
   

  

  

  


 


Diluted

   32,118   31,369   39,785   46,805   30,641 
   

  

  

  


 


(1)Non-cash stock-based compensation represents compensation expense related to our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value and the exercise price of stock options previously issued to our officers. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 are derived from our audited financial statements that do not appear herein. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations to be expected in the future.

  Years Ended December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

 2002

  2001

  2000

 
  (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) 

Consolidated Statements of Operations:

                  

Revenue

 $629,016 $714,209 $775,683  $517,794  $230,766 

Cost of revenue

  484,654  552,052  586,900   388,284   170,608 
  

 

 


 


 


Gross profit

  144,362  162,157  188,783   129,510   60,158 
  

 

 


 


 


Operating expenses:

                  

Selling, general and administrative, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation

  101,436  92,500  97,666   71,483   30,728 

Non-cash stock-based compensation(1)

  750  874  874   31,881   22,379 

Amortization

  248  380  369   5,562   2,387 

Depreciation

  5,589  4,439  3,470   2,151   916 

Transaction costs(2)

  —    —    139   1,955   1,500 
  

 

 


 


 


Total operating expenses

  108,023  98,193  102,518   113,032   57,910 
  

 

 


 


 


Income from operations

  36,339  63,964  86,265   16,478   2,248 

Other expense (income), net:

                  

Interest expense (income), net

  8,440  2,303  (343)  13,933   10,006 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  —    —    —     8,265   —   
  

 

 


 


 


Total other expense (income), net

  8,440  2,303  (343)  22,198   10,006 
  

 

 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

  27,899  61,661  86,608   (5,720)  (7,758)

Income tax expense (benefit)

  10,553  23,869  34,252   (1,334)  (2,560)
  

 

 


 


 


Net income (loss)

 $17,346 $37,792 $52,356  $(4,386) $(5,198)
  

 

 


 


 


Net income (loss) per common share:

                  

Basic

 $0.61 $1.04 $1.23  $(0.14) $(0.23)
  

 

 


 


 


Diluted

 $0.55 $0.95 $1.12  $(0.14) $(0.23)
  

 

 


 


 


Weighted average common shares outstanding:

                  

Basic

  28,248  36,456  42,534   30,641   22,497 
  

 

 


 


 


Diluted

  31,369  39,785  46,805   30,641   22,497 
  

 

 


 


 


(1)Non-cash stock-based compensation represents compensation expense related to our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value and the exercise price of stock options previously issued to our officers. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 9.”

 

 (2)Transaction costs represent costs incurred in connection with our acquisition of Preferred Healthcare Staffing in 2000, our initial public offering in 2001 and our acquisition of Healthcare Resource Management Corporation in 2002.

   Years Ended December 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

 
   (dollars in thousands) 

Other Financial and Operating Data:

                     

Revenue growth (decrease)

   (12)%  (8)%  50%  124%  58%
   


 


 


 


 


Average temporary healthcare professionals on assignment

   6,225   7,113   7,783   5,964   3,166 
   


 


 


 


 


Growth (decrease) in average temporary healthcare professionals on assignment

   (12)%  (9)%  31%  88%  38%
   


 


 


 


 


Capital expenditures

  $5,061  $13,013  $4,328  $4,497  $2,350 
   


 


 


 


 


   As of December 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

 
   (dollars in thousands) 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

                     

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

  $3,908  $4,687  $40,135  $31,968  $546 

Working capital

   77,254   76,982   137,305   116,478   44,149 

Total assets

   286,960   304,532   348,774   308,929   209,410 

Total long-term debt, including current portion

   101,723   138,900   —     —     122,889 

Total stockholders’ equity

   136,776   116,097   295,824   271,905   67,070 

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are “forward-looking statements.” See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Overview

We are a leading temporary healthcare staffing company and the largest nationwide provider of travel nurse staffing services. We recruit nurses and allied health professionals, our “temporary healthcare professionals,” nationally and internationally and place them on temporary assignments of variable lengths at acute care hospitals and healthcare facilities throughout the United States.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded revenue of $629.0 million, as compared to revenue of $714.2 million and $775.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment averaged 6,225, 7,113, and 7,783 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We recorded net income of $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to net income of $37.8 million and $52.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Beginning in 2003 we experienced a decline in demand for our services, which led to a reduction in temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, revenue and net income. See additional discussion in “Recent Trends” and “Results of Operations” below.

We derive substantially all of our revenue from fees paid directly by hospitals and healthcare facilities rather than from payments by government or other third parties. We enter into two types of contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients: payroll contracts and flat rate contracts. Under a payroll contract, the temporary healthcare professional is our employee. We then bill our hospital or healthcare facility client at an hourly rate to compensate us for the temporary healthcare professional’s wages and benefits, as well as for recruitment, housing and travel services. Our clients generally prefer payroll contracts because this arrangement eliminates significant employee and payroll administrative burdens for them. Alternatively, under a flat rate contract, the temporary healthcare professional becomes an employee of the hospital or healthcare facility and is placed on their payroll. We bill the hospital or healthcare facility a “flat” weekly rate to compensate us for providing recruitment, housing and travel services. Temporary healthcare professional wages and benefits billed under a payroll contract effectively represent a pass-through cost component for us and we are compensated by our clients for our value-added services. While payroll contracts generate more gross profit than flat rate contracts, the gross margin generated is lower due to the pass-through of the temporary healthcare professional’s compensation costs. During 2004, approximately 94% of our contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients were payroll contracts.

Since 1998 we have completed five strategic acquisitions. We acquired Medical Express, Inc. in November 1998, which strengthened our presence in the Pacific Northwest and Mountain states. During 2000, we completed the acquisitions of NursesRx, Inc. in June and Preferred Healthcare Staffing, Inc. in November, which strengthened our presence in the Eastern and Southern regions of the United States. We completed our acquisition of OGP in May 2001, the leading recruiter of registered nurses from English-speaking foreign countries for placement in the United States. We completed our fifth acquisition in April 2002, acquiring HRMC, to add to our presence in the Eastern and Southern regions of the United States. Each of these acquisitions has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. Therefore, the operating results of the acquired entities are included in our results of operations commencing on the date of acquisition of each entity. As a result, our results of operations following each acquisition may not be comparable with our prior results.

At the completion of our initial public offering in November 2001, options to purchase 5,182,000 shares of our common stock that we previously granted to members of our management immediately vested. These options

had an average exercise price of $12.45, which was below the initial public offering price of $17.00 per share. As a result, we recorded approximately $18.8 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense in the fourth quarter of 2001, of which $18.7 million was related to these options. In addition, we also recorded $13.1 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense in the first three quarters of 2001, and $22.4 million for 2000. Upon the completionour acquisition of our initial public offering, we utilized a portion of the proceeds to retire all of our existing indebtedness (approximately $145.2 million). The retirement of debt resultedHealthcare Resource Management Corporation in a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $8.3 million in 2001, which was related to the write-off of the unamortized discount on our senior subordinated notes and unamortized deferred financing costs and loan fees.2002.

   As of December 31,

   2005

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

   (dollars in thousands)

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

                    

Cash, cash equivalents and short term investments

  $19,110  $3,908  $4,687  $40,135  $31,968

Total assets

   618,387   286,960   304,532   348,774   308,929

Total long-term debt, including current portion

   205,000   101,723   138,900   —     —  

Total stockholders’ equity

   193,200   136,776   116,097   295,824   271,905

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are “forward-looking statements.” See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Overview

We are the largest temporary healthcare staffing company in the United States. As the leading nationwide provider of travel nurse staffing services and a leading provider of locum tenens (temporary physician staffing) and physician permanent placement services, we recruit physicians, nurses, and allied healthcare professionals, our “healthcare professionals”, nationally and internationally and place them on variable lengths of assignments and in permanent positions at acute-care hospitals, physician groups and other healthcare facilities throughout the United States. With the acquisition of The MHA Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries (“MHA”) on November 2, 2005, we expanded our service lines to include temporary and permanent physician staffing and clearly distinguished AMN as the largest healthcare staffing company.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded revenue of $705.8 million, as compared to revenue of $629.0 million and $714.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We recorded net income of $22.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, as compared to net income of $17.3 million and $37.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Both our temporary healthcare staffing services and permanent placement services are marketed to two distinct customer bases: (1) healthcare professionals and (2) hospitals, healthcare facilities and physician practice group clients. We use distinct brands to market our differentiated services throughout the healthcare staffing spectrum.

We use a multi-brand recruiting strategy to enhance our ability to successfully attract nursing and allied healthcare professionals in the United States and internationally. We market our nurse and allied healthcare professional staffing to our healthcare professionals under recruitment brands including American Mobile Healthcare, Medical Express, NurseChoice InDemand, NursesRx, Preferred Healthcare Staffing, Thera Tech Staffing, Med Travelers, RN Demand, and O’Grady Peyton International. Each brand has distinct clinician focus, market strengths and brand reputation. We market our travel nursing services to hospitals and healthcare facilities under one brand, AMN Healthcare, as a single staffing provider with access to healthcare professionals from several recruitment brands. We market allied services to our clients under the brand names Thera Tech Staffing and Med Travelers, and we market long-term nursing services to our clients under the brand name O’Grady Peyton International. We market our locum tenens and physician permanent placement services under the brand names Staff Care, Inc. and Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, respectively, to both healthcare professionals and hospital and healthcare facilities and physician staffing groups.

Physicians, nurses and allied healthcare professionals join us on temporary assignments for a wide variety of reasons that include: seeking flexible work opportunities, exploring different areas of the country, building their clinical skills and resume by working at prestigious healthcare facilities, escaping the demands and political environment of working as a permanent staff and working through life and career transitions.

Our large number of hospital and healthcare facility clients provides us with the opportunity to offer temporary or permanent positions in all 50 states and in a variety of work environments and clinical settings. In addition, we provide our temporary healthcare professionals with an attractive benefits package that may include free or subsidized housing, free or reimbursed travel, competitive wages, professional development opportunities, a 401(k) plan, and health and professional liability insurance. We believe that we attract temporary healthcare

professionals due to our long-standing reputation for providing a high level of service, our numerous job opportunities, our benefit packages, our innovative marketing programs and word-of-mouth referrals from our thousands of current and former temporary healthcare professionals.

Our clients include hospitals and healthcare systems such as Georgetown University Hospital, HCA, NYU Medical Center, Stanford Health Care, UCLA Medical Center and The University of Chicago Hospitals. We also provide services to military facilities, sub-acute healthcare facilities, physician practice groups, dialysis centers, clinics and schools.

Our hospital and healthcare facility clients utilize our services to cost-effectively manage shortages in their staff due to a variety of circumstances, such as attrition, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), new unit openings, seasonal patient census variations and other short-term, long-term and permanent staffing needs. In addition to providing continuity of care and quality patient care, we believe hospitals and healthcare facilities contract with us due to our high-quality temporary healthcare professionals, our ability to meet their specific staffing needs, our flexible staffing assignment lengths, our reliable and deep infrastructure, our superior customer service, our ability to offer a large national network of temporary healthcare professionals, and our ability to provide temporary staffing solutions while we assist the facility in filling permanent staffing needs.

We completed secondary offerings of our common stock for 2,300,000 and 10,631,303 shares on April 18, 2005 and May 27, 2005, respectively. All of the 12,931,303 shares were sold by affiliates of Haas Wheat & Partners, L.P. (the “HWP Stockholders”), a private equity investment firm whose affiliates had owned shares of the company since 1999.

On November 2, 2005, we completed the acquisition of The MHA Group, Inc., a Texas corporation, and subsidiaries (“MHA”). MHA, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, provides temporary physician, nurse and allied healthcare staffing services and physician and allied healthcare permanent placement services. The purchase price is comprised of $160.0 million of initial consideration plus acquisition costs of $2.7 million and an earn-out payment of $47.3 million based on MHA’s financial performance for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, which was paid by March 10, 2006. The initial $160.0 million of consideration and the earn-out payment were paid approximately 75% in cash and 25% in unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share. At the closing of the acquisition of MHA, we issued 2.3 million shares of common stock and issued an additional 0.7 million shares on March 9, 2006 for payment of the earn-out amounts.

In connection with the acquisition, we amended our existing credit facility. Our amended and restated credit facility (“The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement” or “New Credit Agreement”) provides for, among other things, a $75 million secured revolving credit facility, a $30 million letter of credit sub-facility, a $15 million swing-line sub-facility, all maturing in November 2010, and a new $205 million secured term loan facility maturing in November 2011. The new secured term loan facility was used to pay off existing borrowings of $87.8 million of term debt and provide financing for the acquisition and related transaction costs. We wrote off $1.2 million of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a result of the refinancing and incurred financing costs in connection with the New Credit Agreement of $4.8 million, which will be amortized over the term of the New Credit Agreement. The six year, $205 million, term loan portion of our New Credit Agreement is subject to quarterly amortization of principal with an amount equal to 1.25% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly through September 30, 2007 (except in the case of the initial quarterly payment on June 30, 2006 of 2.5%) and 2.5% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2010 with any remaining amounts payable in 2011. These quarterly payments begin on June 30, 2006 with an initial payment of $5.1 million.

 

On October 16, 2003, we completed a tender offer for an aggregate of $180 million, or approximately 10 million shares of our common stock and certain employee stock options. In connection with the tender offer, we amended our credit facility. The amended credit facility provides for, among other things, a $75 million secured revolving credit facility, letter of credit sub-facility and swing-line loan sub-facility and a new $130 million secured term loan facility maturing in October 2008. Our amended and restated credit agreement stipulates a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio and other customary covenants.

Recent Trends

 

From 1996It is estimated that from 1997 through 2000,2005, the temporary healthcare staffing industry grew at a compound annual growth rate of 13%approximately 9%, growing each year except 2003 and this growth accelerated2004 in which the industry declined

on an annual basis. During the decline, the locum tenens market was estimated to a compound annualhave grown by approximately 17% and 11% in 2003 and 2004, respectively, while the travel nursing staffing market was estimated to have declined by approximately 9% in 2003 and 2004. It is estimated that from 2004 to 2005, the locum tenens and travel nurse staffing markets grew by approximately 12% and 1%, respectively, as compared to the overall temporary healthcare industry growth rate of approximately 21% from 2000 to 2002. During 2003,2.5%. We believe that the demandgrowth of the locum tenens market reflects the growing physician shortage, the relative immaturity of the market for temporary healthcare professionals declined due to a numberphysicians, and the financial justification for use of factors. In particular, we believetemporary physicians by hospitals increased their nurse recruitment efforts, stretched the productivity of permanent staff and maximized cost control efforts to eliminate or reduce outsourced staffing solutions. In addition, influenced by economic conditions during 2003, we believe permanent staff at our hospital and healthcare facility clients were more likelyfacilities to work overtime and less likely to leave their positions, creating fewer vacancies and fewer opportunities for us to recruit and place ourgenerate incremental revenue.

The temporary healthcare professionals.

Demand for our services stabilized from April 2003 through late 2003, and increased each quarterstaffing industry is expected to grow by approximately 5% in 2004.2006. We believe that this improvement in demand has been caused by a number of factors, includingexpected growth is based on favorable economic conditions and an increase in hospital admissions, legislation impacting healthcare staffing such as the California nurse-to-patient staffing ratios that went into effect in January 2004, signs of an improving economystaff job openings and our increased focus on our hospital and healthcare facility clients.turnover. While this rise in demandgrowth is positive and createsis expected to expand the opportunities for growth, increases inavailable to healthcare professionals, the available supply of new temporary healthcare professional candidates hasprofessionals is not grown atexpected to keep pace with the same pace asincrease in demand.

We primarily draw our supply of temporary healthcare professionals from national recruitment efforts through our targeted multi-brand recruitment strategy. We believe that sustained growth in hospital and healthcare facility orders will generate increasing interest and new recruiting opportunities in travel nursing. Recently, international supply channels have represented a small but growing supply source; however, our ability to recruit healthcare professionals through these foreign supply channels may be impacted by government legislation limiting the number of permanent immigrant visas that can be issued and the processing times associated with these visas.

The number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment with us decreased 12% from an average of 7,113 in 2003 to an average of 6,225 in 2004. Primarily as a result of this decline, our revenue and net income also decreased. However, demand for our services has grown during each quarter of 2004. We are uncertain whether these increases in demand for our services will generate consistent future growth in the average number of our temporary healthcare professionals on assignment.

 

Critical Accounting Principles and Estimates

 

We have identified the following critical accounting policies that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of our financial

statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-goingon going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to asset impairment, accruals for self-insurance and compensation and related benefits, allowance for doubtful accounts and contingencies and litigation. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

 

1) Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

We have recorded goodwill resulting from our past acquisitions. Commencing with the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002, we ceased amortizing goodwill and have performed annual impairment analyses to assess the recoverability of the goodwill and intangible assets, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. Upon our annual impairment analyses on December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, we determined that there was no impairment of goodwill.goodwill and intangible assets. If we are required to record an impairment charge in the future, it could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. As of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, we had $135.4$240.8 million and $135.5$135.4 million, respectively, of goodwill, net of accumulated amortization, and $121.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheets.

The increase in goodwill and intangible assets is primarily due to our acquisition of MHA in November 2005.

 

2) Professional Liability Reserve

We maintain an accrual for professional liability self-insured retention limits, net of our insurance recoverable, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other long term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of this accrual by evaluating our historical experience and trends, loss reserves established by our insurance carriers and third party administrators, as well as through the use of independent actuarial studies. We obtain updated actuarial studies on a regular basis that use actual claims data to determine the appropriate reserves for

incurred, but not reported, professional liability claims for each year. As of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had $13.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively, accrued for professional liability retention of which $1.9 and $2.2 was classified as a current liability, respectively. The increase in the professional liability accrual was primarily related to the accrual added as a result of the acquisition of MHA, offset by payments made for claims related to prior periods.

3) Self-Insured Health Insurance Claims Reserve

 

We maintain an accrual for incurred, but not reported, claims arising from self-insured health benefits we provide to our temporary nurse and allied healthcare professionals, which is included in accrued compensation and benefits in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of this accrual by evaluating our historical experience and trends related to both health insurance claims and payments, information provided to us by our insurance broker and third party administrator and industry experience and trends. If such information indicates that our accruals are overstated or understated, we reduce or provide for additional accruals. Our accrual at December 31, 20042005 was based on (i) a monthly average of our actual historical health insurance claim amounts and (ii) the average period of time from the date the claim is incurred to the date that it is reported to us and paid. We believe this is the best estimate of the amount of incurred, but not reported, self-insured health benefit claims at year-end. As of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, we had $2.3$2.4 million and $3.5$2.3 million, respectively, accrued for incurred, but not reported, health insurance claims. The declineincrease in the accrual was primarily related to a favorable trendan increase in insurance claims paid over the past year.average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment. Historically, our accrual for health insurance has been adequate to provide for incurred claims and has fluctuated with increases or decreases in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, changes in our claims experience and changes in the reporting and processing time for claims.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated credit losses resulting from collection risks, including the inability of our customers to make required payments. This results in a provision for bad debt expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reported as a reduction of accounts receivable in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of this allowance by evaluating the credit risk for individual customer receivables, considering the financial condition of each customer and historical payment trends, delinquency trends, credit histories of customers and current economic conditions. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of

their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be provided. As of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts was primarily related to $1.7 million of write-offs of fully reserved receivables in the prior year, favorable trends in our customer collections experience and overall reductions in accounts receivable balances.

Professional Liability Reserve

We maintain an accrual for professional liability self-insured retention limits, net of our insurance recoverable, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of this accrual by evaluating our historical experience and trends, loss reserves established by our insurance carriers and third party administrators, as well as through the use of independent actuarial studies. We obtain updated actuarial studies on a semi-annual basis that use actual claims data to determine the appropriate reserves for incurred, but not reported, professional liability claims for each year. Due to our varied historical claims loss experience, our actuary provides us with a range of incurred, but not reported, claim reserves. The range for the total professional liability reserve at December 31, 2004, which incorporated the range for incurred, but not reported, claims provided by our actuaries, was between $7.0 million and $8.4 million. As of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had $7.0 million and $3.9 million, respectively, accrued for professional liability retention. Because of our varied loss history, there is no amount within the range that management or the actuaries believe is a better estimate than any other amount. As such, we accrued the low end of the range at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The increase in the professional liability accrual was related to expected claims incurred, but not reported, during the year ended December 31, 2004 based on recent unfavorable development of reported claims and the unfavorable impact on incurred, but not reported, claims, offset by an immaterial amount of payments made during the period.

4) Workers Compensation Reserve

 

We maintain an accrual for workers compensation self-insured retention limits, which is included in accrued compensation and benefits and other long term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of these accruals by evaluating our historical experience and trends, loss reserves established by our insurance carriers and third party administrators, as well as through the use of independent actuarial studies. We obtain updated actuarial studies on a semi-annual basis that use actual claims data to determine the appropriate reserve both for reported claims and incurred, but not reported, claims for each policy year. The actuarial study for workers compensation provides us with the estimated losses for prior policy years and an estimated percentage of payroll compensation to be accrued for the current year. We record our accruals based on the amounts provided in the actuarial study, and we believe this is the best estimate of our liability for reported claims and incurred, but not reported, claims. As of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, we had $8.1$10.1 million and $7.6$8.1 million, respectively, accrued for workers compensation claims. Claimclaims, of which $3.0 million and $2.7 million was classified as a current liability, respectively. The increase is due to the fact that claim payments made against the reserve in 2004during 2005 for the current and prior years lagged behind the increase inadditions to the reserve as reserves continue to remain outstanding for workers compensation claims incurred during the course of the last four years. In addition, duringWe have recently experienced a slight decrease in workers compensation rates based on recent favorable historical claims experience that slightly offsets these increases.

5) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated credit losses resulting from collection risks, including the year endedinability of our customers to make required payments. This results in a provision for bad debt expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reported as a reduction of accounts

receivable in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of this allowance by evaluating the credit risk for individual customer receivables, considering the financial condition of each customer and historical payment trends, delinquency trends, credit histories of customers and current economic conditions. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be provided. As of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we reducedour allowance for doubtful accounts was $2.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The increase was primarily related to the accrualincrease in accounts receivable resulting from the acquisition of MHA. The MHA allowance for workers compensation for prior policy years bydoubtful accounts of $0.5 million basedrepresents the reserve on new receivables generated from the most recent independent actuarial study we received. There has not been any material change in workers compensation rates.

acquisition date through December 31, 2005.

 

6) Contingent Liabilities

 

We are subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. Some of these matters include payroll and employee-related matters and investigations by governmental agencies regarding our employment practices. As we become aware of such claims and legal actions, we provide

accruals if the exposures are probable and estimable. If an adverse outcome of such claims and legal actions is reasonably possible, we assess materiality and provide disclosure, as appropriate. We may also become subject to claims, governmental inquiries and investigations and legal actions relating to services provided by our temporary healthcare professionals, and we maintain accruals for these matters if the amounts are probable and estimable. We are currently not aware of any such pending or threatened litigation that would be considered reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations data as a percentage of revenue. Our results of operations include a nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment and a physician staffing segment. We completed our acquisition of MHA in November 2005, therefore the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 only includes the results of operations of MHA and the physician staffing segment since the date of acquisition. Accordingly, reporting segment information would not be meaningful, and our historical results are reported as a single business segment.not necessarily indicative of our results of operations to be expected in the future.

 

    Years Ended December 31,

   Years Ended December 31,

 
    2004

 2003

 2002

   2005

 2004

 2003

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations:

        

Revenue

    100.0% 100.0% 100.0%  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of revenue

    77.0  77.3  75.7   75.9  77.0  77.3 
    

 

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

    23.0  22.7  24.3   24.1  23.0  22.7 

Selling, general and administrative, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation

    16.1  13.0  12.6   16.6  16.1  13.0 

Non-cash stock-based compensation

    0.1  0.1  0.1   0.0  0.1  0.1 

Depreciation and amortization

    1.0  0.7  0.5   0.9  1.0  0.7 
    

 

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

    5.8  8.9  11.1   6.6  5.8  8.9 

Interest expense (income), net

    1.3  0.3  (0.1)  1.3  1.3  0.3 
    

 

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes

    4.5  8.6  11.2   5.3  4.5  8.6 

Income tax expense

    1.7  3.3  4.4   2.1  1.7  3.3 
    

 

 

  

 

 

Net income

    2.8% 5.3% 6.8%  3.2% 2.8% 5.3%
    

 

 

  

 

 

Comparison of Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2005 to the Year Ended December 31, 2004 .

Revenue.    Revenue increased 12%, to $705.8 million for 2005 from $629.0 million for 2004. Of the $76.8 million increase, $53.3 million was attributable to the acquisition of MHA in November 2005, $14.6 million was attributable to the increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on

assignment, $6.2 million was attributable to the increase in revenue generated per traveler due primarily to an increase in the average bill rates charged to hospital and healthcare facility clients, and $4.5 million was attributable to a shift in the mix from flat rate contracts to hours and days worked contracts. The increase was partially offset by one less day in 2005 which reduced revenue by $1.8 million.

Cost of Revenue.    Cost of revenue increased 11%, to $535.6 million for 2005 from $484.7 million for 2004. Of the $50.9 million increase, $36.5 million was attributable to the acquisition of MHA in November 2005, $11.3 million was attributable to the increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, $0.9 million was attributable to net increases in compensation provided to our temporary healthcare professionals, $3.6 million was attributable to the shift in the mix from flat rate contracts to hours and days worked contracts, and partially offset by a decrease of $1.4 million attributable to one less day in 2005.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased 18%, to $170.2 million for 2005 from $144.4 million for 2004, representing gross margins of 24.1% and 23.0%, respectively. The increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to an increase in the spread between bill rates and pay rates and the addition of the higher gross margin in the physician staffing segment through the acquisition of MHA in November 2005.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation, increased 16%, to $117.2 million for 2005 from $101.4 million for 2004. Of the $15.8 million increase, $11.7 million was attributable to the acquisition of MHA in November 2005, with the remaining $4.1 million increase primarily attributable to increases in employee expenses from a combination of normal growth in costs per employee and selective headcount additions, partially offset by decreases in professional liability insurance and professional services costs.

Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation.    We recorded non-cash compensation charges of $0.1 million in 2005 and $0.8 million in 2004 in connection with our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value at the measurement date and the exercise prices of previously issued stock options, which are amortized over their respective vesting periods. The decrease relates to the cancellation and completed vesting of previously issued stock options issued at exercise prices below fair market value.

Amortization and Depreciation.    Amortization expense was $0.6 million in 2005 and $0.2 million in 2004. The increase was primarily attributable to the amortization of identifiable amortizable intangible assets obtained from the acquisition of MHA in November 2005. Depreciation expense of $5.6 million was consistent for 2005 and 2004.

Interest Expense, Net.    Interest expense, net, was $9.6 million for 2005 as compared to $8.4 million for 2004. The increase was primarily due to a $1.2 million write-off of deferred financing costs from the refinancing of our credit facility in connection with the acquisition of MHA in November 2005.

Income Tax Expense.    Income tax expense increased to $14.9 million for 2005 from $10.6 million for 2004, reflecting effective income tax rates of 40.2% and 37.8% for these periods, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to increases in the state tax provision.

 

Comparison of Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2003

 

Revenue.    Revenue decreased 12%, to $629.0 million for 2004 from $714.2 million for 2003 to $629.0 million for 2004.2003. This decrease is comparable to the decrease in the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, which decreased 12% from an average of 7,113 for 2003 to an average of 6,225 for 2004.2004 from 7,113 for 2003. Of the $85.2 million decrease, $89.3 million was attributable to the decline in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and $2.6 million was attributable to a shift in the mix from payrollhours and days worked contracts to flat rate contracts. These decreases were partially offset by improvements in contract terms, which included increases in bill rates charged to hospital and healthcare facility clients, of approximately $5.0 million, and the additional day from leap year in 2004, due to 2004 being a leap year, which contributed $1.7 million.

Cost of Revenue.    Cost of revenue decreased 12%, to $484.7 million for 2004 from $552.1 million for 2003 to $484.7 million for 2004.2003. Of the $67.4 million decrease, approximately $69.1 million was attributable to the decline in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, partially offset by an increase of approximately $0.4 million attributable to net increases in compensation provided to our temporary healthcare professionals and by an increase of approximately $1.3 million attributable to the extra day in 2004.

 

Gross Profit.    Gross profit decreased 11%, to $144.4 million for 2004 from $162.2 million for 2003, to $144.4 million for 2004, representing gross margins of 22.7%23.0% and 23.0%22.7%, respectively. The increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to decreased health insurance, housing and retirement costs as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by increases in compensation provided to our temporary healthcare professionals compensation.professionals.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation, increased 10%, to $101.4 million for 2004 from $92.5 million for 2003 to $101.4 million for 2004.2003. The $8.9 million increase was primarily attributable to an increase in expenses related to corporate facilities as we occupied a larger corporate facility for a full year compared to a half year in 2003 and corporate employee and professional services increases related to additional compliance requirements in connection with compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, we recorded an increase in our professional liability insurance reserve as we have experienced negative trends in our malpractice claims development. These increases were partially offset by a $1.2 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2003 related to vested stock options purchased in our October 2003 tender offer that was not incurred during 2004.

 

Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation.    We recorded non-cash compensation charges of $0.8 million in 2004 and $0.9 million in 2003 and $0.8 million in 2004 in connection with our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value at the measurement date and the exercise prices of previously issued stock options, which are amortized over their respective vesting periods.

 

Amortization and Depreciation.    Amortization expense was $0.2 million in 2004 and $0.4 million in 2003 and $0.2 million in 2004.2003. Depreciation expense increased to $5.6 million for 2004 from $4.4 million for 2003 to $5.6 million for 2004.2003. This increase was primarily attributable to internally developed software placed into service in 20032004 and 20042003 and additions of leasehold improvements and assets acquired in connection with the consolidation of several San Diego, California locations into a new corporate headquarters facility during the second half of 2003.

 

OtherInterest Expense, Net.    Interest expense, net, was $8.4 million for 2004 as compared to $2.3 million for 2003, as compared to $8.4 million for 2004, due primarily to interest charges related to borrowings initiated under our credit facility in October 2003 to fund our tender offer and the amortization of deferred financing costs associated with those borrowings. In addition, interest expense was also higher due to the write-off of $0.5 million of deferred financing costs during 2004 related to $24.3 million in voluntary prepayments on our long-term debt.

 

Income Tax Expense.    Income tax expense decreased to $10.6 million for 2004 from $23.9 million for 2003, to $10.6 million for 2004, reflecting effective income tax rates of 38.7%37.8% and 37.8%38.7% for these periods, respectively. The reduction in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in the state tax provision in 2004.

 

Comparison of Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Revenue.    Revenue decreased 8%, from $775.7 million for 2002 to $714.2 million for 2003. This decrease was comparable to the decrease in the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment, which decreased 9% from an average of 7,783 for 2002 to an average of 7,113 for 2003. Of the $61.5 million decrease, approximately $72.2 million was attributable to the 9% contraction in our existing brands through a decline in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and $12.4 million was attributable to a shift in the mix from payroll to flat rate contracts. These decreases were partially offset by improvements in contract terms in our existing brands, which included increases in bill rates charged to hospital and healthcare facility clients, of approximately $17.8 million. The remainder of the offsetting increase in revenue, $5.4 million, was attributable to the results of HRMC, which we acquired in April 2002.

Cost of Revenue.    Cost of revenue decreased 6%, from $586.9 million for 2002 to $552.1 million for 2003. Of the $34.8 million decrease, approximately $39.0 million was attributable to the organic decline of our existing brands, offset by an approximately $4.2 million increase attributable to the operations of HRMC.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit decreased 14%, from $188.8 million for 2002 to $162.2 million for 2003, representing gross margins of 24.3% and 22.7%, respectively. The decrease in the gross margin was primarily attributable to increased compensation, insurance and housing costs as a percentage of revenue.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation, decreased 5%, from $97.7 million for 2002 to $92.5 million for 2003. The $5.2 million decrease was primarily attributable to reductions in the allowance for doubtful accounts due to

favorable collections, reductions in employee expenses related to the decline in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and reductions in professional services. These decreases were partially offset by increased advertising and insurance expenses due to an increase in our professional liability reserve, increased expenses as a result of our acquisition of HRMC and a $1.2 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2003 related to vested stock options purchased in our October 2003 tender offer.

Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation.    We recorded non-cash compensation charges of $0.9 million in each of 2002 and 2003 in connection with our stock option plans to reflect the difference between the fair market value at the measurement date and the exercise prices of previously issued stock options, which are amortized over their respective vesting periods.

Amortization and Depreciation.    Amortization expense of $0.4 million was consistent for 2002 and 2003, as there were no significant changes in the carrying values of intangible assets subject to amortization. Depreciation expense increased from $3.5 million for 2002 to $4.4 million for 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to internally developed software placed into service in 2002, amortization of assets acquired under capital leases, and additions of leasehold improvements and assets acquired in connection with the consolidation of several San Diego, California locations into our new corporate headquarters facility during the second half of 2003.

Transaction Costs.    Transaction costs of $0.1 million for 2002 represent non-capitalized costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of HRMC.

Other Expense (Income), Net.    Interest expense (income), net, was income of $0.3 million for 2002 as compared to expense of $2.3 million for 2003, due primarily to the liquidation of investments held in 2002, interest charges related to the amendment of our revolving credit facility in October 2003, and the amortization of deferred financing costs associated with our debt issuance.

Income Tax Expense.    Income tax expense decreased from $34.3 million for 2002 to $23.9 million for 2003, reflecting effective income tax rates of 39.5% and 38.7% for these periods, respectively. The reduction in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in the state tax provision.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Historically, our primary liquidity requirements have been for acquisitions, working capital requirements and debt service under our credit facility. We have funded these requirements through internally generated cash flow and funds borrowed under our credit facility. At December 31, 2004, $101.72005, $205 million was outstanding under our credit facility. We believe that cash generated from operations and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months. We expect to be able to finance future acquisitions either with cash provided from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, bank loans, debt or equity offerings, or some combination of the foregoing. The following discussion provides further details of our liquidity and capital resources.

Operating Activities:

 

Historically, our principal working capital need has been for accounts receivable. At December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, our Days Sales Outstanding (“DSO”) was 57 days and 63 days, and 68respectively. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of MHA, DSO was 59 days respectively.at December 31, 2005. The decrease in DSO was primarily related to the return to normal clientacquisition of MHA in November 2005, which historically has lower DSO than AMN, as well as improvements in billing and collection processes during 2004 after a temporary delay in client billings associated with the implementation of a new payroll and billing system initiated in November 2003 and the resulting improvement of these processes due to the upgraded system.processes. Our principal sources of cash to fund our working capital needs are cash generated from operating activities and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Net cash provided by operations decreased $26.1increased $5.1 million from $65.1to $44.1 million in 2003 to2005 from $39.0 million in 2004. This decreaseincrease in net cash provided by operations was primarily related to the decrease in net incomedriven by increased earnings compared to the prior year, offset by the collection of accounts receivablefiscal 2004 and the reduction in DSO.

tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred income taxes.

Investing Activities:

 

We continue to have relatively low capital investment requirements. Capital expenditures were $3.8 million, $5.1 million and $13.0 million in 2005, 2004 and $4.3 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. In 2004,2005, our capital expenditures were $4.3$3.0 million for purchased and internally developed software, and $0.8 million for computers, furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements and other expenditures. The higher level of capital expenditures in 2003 was primarily related to leasehold improvements for our new corporate headquarters. We expect our future capital expenditure requirements to be similar to 2004,2005, in relation to revenue.

 

Our business acquisition expenditures were $9.5$111.5 million in 2002 and2005 compared to $0 in 20032004 and 2004. In April 2002, we completed the2003. Our 2005 expenditures were primarily related to our acquisition of HRMC.MHA in November 2005. This acquisition was financed withthrough a combination of bank debt, cash provided by operations.operations and AMN common stock.

 

Financing Activities:

 

InOn November 2002, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing a repurchase of up to $100 million of our common stock on the open market from time to time through December 2003. Stock repurchases were subject to prevailing market conditions and other considerations, including limitations under applicable securities laws. Under the terms of the repurchase program,2, 2005, we repurchased 5,154,200 shares atacquired MHA for an averageinitial purchase price of $14.29 per share, or$160.0 million plus acquisition costs of $2.7 million, and an aggregateearn-out payment of $73.7 million.$47.3 million of additional consideration based on the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 performance of MHA. The initial $160.0 million of consideration and the earn-out payment were paid approximately 75% in cash and 25% in unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock. We do not currently have any authorized stock repurchase programs.

On October 16, 2003, we completed a tender offer for an aggregate of $180paid $35.9 million or approximately 10in cash and issued 0.7 million shares of our common stock and certain employee stock options. by March 10, 2006 related to the earn-out. In addition, as part of the acquisition, $15.0 million of the initial consideration was held back for possible contingencies. As of December 31, 2005, $0.4 million of the $15.0 million was paid to the selling shareholders, with the balance due in March 2007, net of any indemnification claims.

In connection with the tender offer,acquisition, we amended and restated our existing credit facility. The amendedOur new credit facility, the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“New Credit Agreement”), provides for, among other things, a $75$75.0 million secured revolving credit facility, a $30.0 million letter of credit sub-facility, anda $15.0 million swing-line loan sub-facility, all maturing in November 2010, and a new $130$205.0 million secured term loan facility maturing in October 2008. Our amendedNovember 2011. The new secured term loan facility was used to pay off existing borrowings of $87.8 million of term debt and restated credit agreement stipulates a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratioprovide financing for the cash portion of the initial $145.0 million of consideration, net of the $15.0 million holdback, and other customary covenants.

On July 21, 2004, we amended our credit facility to provide for increased flexibilityrelated acquisition and financing costs of $2.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively. We funded the $35.9 million cash portion of the earn-out payment on March 10, 2006 with cash on hand and borrowings under our financial covenants, an increase in the amount available under our letter ofrevolving credit sub-facility and a 25 basis point increase in the interest rate margin in the event of a downgrade in our credit rating. Based on our outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2004, a downgrade in our credit rating and the resulting revised pricing would increase our interest expense by approximately $254,000 on an annualized basis. Since the amendment of our credit facility in July 2004, we have not had a downgrade in our credit rating.facility.

 

The revolving credit facility portion of our New Credit Agreement carries an unused fee of between 0.5% and 0.375% per annum based on our current leverage ratio, and there are no mandatory reductions in the revolving commitment under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a prime interest rate option selected by us, plus a spread of 1.50% to 2.25% and 0.50% to 1.25%, respectively, to be determined based on our current leverage ratio. Amounts available under our revolving credit facility may be used for working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and general corporate purposes, subject to various limitations.

The fivesix year, $130$205 million term loan portion of our credit facilityNew Credit Agreement is subject to quarterly amortization of principal (in equal installments), with an amount equal to 1.15%1.25% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly. These quarterly payments beganthrough September 30, 2007 (except in the case of the initial quarterly payment on June 30, 20042006 of 2.5%) and continue until 20082.5% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly from December 31, 2007 through September 30, 2010 with any remaining amounts payable in 2008.2011. These quarterly payments begin on June 30, 2006 with an initial payment of $5.1 million. Voluntary prepayments of the term loan portion of the credit facility are applied as we may elect, including ratably to the remaining quarterly amortization payments. We paid the initial principal installmentBorrowings under this term loan facility bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a prime interest rate option selected by us, plus a spread of $1.5 million1.75% or 2.00% and 0.75% or 1.00%, respectively, to be determined based on June 30, 2004, and the second and third mandatory installments of $1.3 million and $1.2 million on September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The mandatory installments were reduced after the initial installment due to the $24.3 million of voluntary prepayments made during the second half of 2004. In addition, we wrote off $0.5 million of deferred financing costs, which is included in interest expense, during the year ended December 31, 2004 related to these voluntary prepayments.

our current leverage ratio.

We are required to make additional mandatory prepayments on the term loan with the proceeds of asset dispositions, extraordinary receipts, debt issuances and certain equity issuances. We also are required to make mandatory prepayments on the term loan within ninety days after the end of each fiscal year, commencing with the fiscal year endingended December 31, 2004. The prepayment required is2006 in an amount equal to 50% of our excess cash flow (as defined in the credit agreement)Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement), less any voluntary prepayments made during the fiscal year. TheThese mandatory prepayment amount,amounts, if any, isare applied ratably to the remaining quarterly amortization payments. The voluntary prepayments made during 2004 satisfied this additional prepayment requirement

We are required to maintain a maximum leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter of not more than 3.75 to 1.00 for the yearfiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004.2005, decreasing throughout the term of the agreement to ultimately arrive at a ratio of 2.00 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2009 and thereafter. We are also required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter of not less than 2.00 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2005, decreasing throughout the term of the agreement to ultimately arrive at a ratio of 1.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008 and thereafter. We are also subject to limitations on the amount of our annual capital expenditures and on the amount of consolidated total assets and consolidated EBITDA that may be owned or attributable to our foreign subsidiaries. We were in compliance with these requirements at December 31, 2005.

Under our New Credit Agreement, our subsidiaries are not permitted to pay dividends or distributions to us, except for certain permitted dividends and distributions, including those related to taxes, certain reporting obligations under federal and state law and certain other ordinary course operating expenses, subject to the limitations contained in our New Credit Agreement.

 

We are also required to maintain interest rate protection on at least 50% of the term loan portion of our credit facilityNew Credit Agreement beginning May 2006 until January 1, 2006. OnNovember 2008. In October 17, 2003, we entered into threean interest rate swap arrangementsagreement to minimize our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on $110the first $30 million of our outstanding variable rate debt under our existing credit facility. Asfacility whereby we pay a fixed rate of December 31, 2004,2.65% and receive a floating three-month LIBOR. This agreement expires in September 2006, and no initial investment was made to enter into this agreement.

In June 2005, we haveentered into two additional interest rate swap agreements. The first agreement has a notional amount of $20 million and became effective in September 2005, whereby we pay a fixed rate of 3.99% and receive a floating three-month LIBOR. The agreement expires in March 2007. The second agreement will become effective in September 2006, with a notional amount of $15 million, whereby we pay a fixed rate of 4.09% and receive a floating three-month LIBOR. This agreement will expire in September 2007.

In November 2005, we entered into five additional interest rate swap agreements in place to minimize our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on $80 million of our outstanding variable rate debt under our credit facility. The two swaps havefor notional amounts of $50,000,000$15 million, $10 million, $30 million, $35 million and $30,000,000,$50 million, whereby we pay a fixed ratesrate of 2.06%4.82%, 4.95%, 4.87%, 4.94%, and 2.65%4.97%, respectively, and receive a floating three-month LIBOR. The first agreement expired in September 2004, and the remaining twoThese agreements expire in September 2005December 2007, June 2008, December 2008, December 2009 and September 2006, respectively, and no initial investments were made to enter into these agreements. December 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the interest rate swap agreements had a fair value of $650,000($0.1) million and ($198,000),$0.7 million, respectively, which is included in other assets and other liabilities respectively, in the accompanying consolidated

balance sheets. We have formally documented the hedging relationships and account for these arrangements as cash flow hedges.

 

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, thisour existing credit facility also served to collateralize certain letters of credit aggregating $9.6 million and $7.2 million, respectively, issued by us in the normal course of business.

 

Contractual Obligations.Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20042005 (in thousands):

 

  Fiscal Year

     Fiscal Year

  2005

  2006

  2007

  2008

  2009

  Thereafter

  Total

  2006

  2007

  2008

  2009

  2010

  Thereafter

  Total

Long-term debt (1)

  $4,863  $4,863  $4,863  $87,134  $—    $—    $101,723  $23,363  $25,218  $31,854  $30,489  $54,781  $97,916  $263,621

Capital lease obligations (2)

   376   376   150   13   —     —     915   494   493   479   464   158   —     2,088

Operating lease obligations (3)

   8,401   8,719   9,013   8,657   8,653   49,704   93,147   16,327   17,820   17,417   17,389   17,149   85,102   171,204

Earn-out payable in cash (4)

   35,879   —     —     —     —     —     35,879

Cash holdback (5)

   2,362   12,238   —     —     —     —     14,600
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total Contractual Obligations

  $13,640  $13,958  $14,026  $95,804  $8,653  $49,704  $195,785

Total contractual obligations

  $78,425  $55,769  $49,750  $48,342  $72,088  $183,018  $487,392
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 (1)Amounts represent contractual principal amounts due, (excluding interest).including interest.

 

 (2)Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest, with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year.

 

 (3)Amounts represent minimum contractual amounts, with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year. We have assumed no escalations in rent or changes in variable expenses other than as stipulated in lease contracts.

 

(4)Amount represents the earn-out payable in cash in connection with the MHA acquisition.

(5)Amounts represent the cash holdback payable in cash in connection with the MHA acquisition.

Off-Balance Sheet and Other Financing Arrangements

 

At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, variable interest or special purpose, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance-sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if

we had engaged in such relationships. We do not have relationships or transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties other than what is disclosed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 10.”

 

Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results and Seasonality

 

Due to the regional and seasonal fluctuations in the hospital patient census and nurse staffing needs of our hospital and healthcare facility clients and due to seasonal preferences for destinations of our temporary healthcare professionals, revenue, earnings and the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment are subject to moderate seasonal fluctuations. Many of our hospital and healthcare facility clients are located in areas that experience seasonal fluctuations in population during the winter and summer months. These facilities

adjust their staffing levels to accommodate the change in this seasonal demand and many of these facilities utilize temporary healthcare professionals to satisfy these seasonal staffing needs. This historical seasonality of revenue and earnings may vary due to a variety of factors and the results of any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.

 

Inflation

 

Although inflation has abated during the last several years, the rate of inflation in healthcare related services continues to exceed the rate experienced by the economy as a whole. Our contracts typically provide for an annual increase in the fees paid to us by our clients based on increases in various inflation indices allowing us to pass on inflation costs to our clients.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued SFASStatement No. 123 (Revised),Share-Based Payment, (“SFAS No.FAS 123R”), which amends SFASStatement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No.FAS 123R requires the measurement of compensation cost related to all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such cost in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, FAS 123R requires the estimated forfeitures be considered in determining compensation cost. The accounting provisions of SFAS No.FAS 123R are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. We haveFAS 123R, which provides certain changes to the method for valuing share-based compensation among other changes, will apply to new awards and to awards that are outstanding on the effective date and are subsequently modified or cancelled. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not yet determined our planned methodbeen rendered as of adoption orthe effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under FAS 123R. At December 31, 2005, of the $11.9 million unamortized compensation expense before the effect of adopting SFAS No.income taxes related to outstanding unvested options, as determined in accordance with FAS 123, $5.1 million is expected to be recorded during fiscal 2006. We will likely incur additional expense during 2006 related to new awards granted during 2006 that cannot yet be quantified. We adopted FAS 123R on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method and therefore we have not determined whetherwill value share-based awards granted after the adoption will resulteffective date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is consistent with the valuation method previously used for footnote disclosure purposes in amounts similar to the pro forma amounts disclosed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1 (o).”accordance with FAS 123.

 

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. The following factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report:

 

our ability to continue to recruit qualified temporary and permanent healthcare professionals at reasonable costs;

our ability to retain qualified temporary healthcare professionals for multiple assignments at reasonable costs;

 

our ability to attract and retain sales and operational personnel;

our ability to enter into contracts with hospitals, and other healthcare facility clients, affiliated healthcare networks and physician practice groups on terms attractive to us and to secure orders related to those contracts;

 

our ability to demonstrate the value of our services to our healthcare and facility clients;

 

changes in the timing of hospital, and healthcare facility and physician practice group clients’ orders for and our placement of temporary healthcare professionals;

 

the general level of patient occupancy at our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ facilities;

 

the overall level of demand for services offered by temporary and permanent healthcare staffing providers;

 

the ability of our hospital, and healthcare facility and physician practice group clients to retain and increase the productivity of their permanent staff;

the variation in pricing of the healthcare facility contracts under which we place temporary healthcare professionals;

 

our ability to successfully implement our strategic growth, acquisition and integration strategies;

 

our ability to leverage our cost structure;

 

the performance of our management information and communication systems;

 

the effect of existing or future government legislation and regulation;

 

our ability to grow and operate our business in compliance with legislation and regulation;regulations;

the challenge to the classification of certain of our healthcare professionals as independent contractors;

 

the impact of medical malpractice and other claims asserted against us;

 

the disruption or adverse impact to our business as a result of a terrorist attack;

 

our ability to carry out our business strategy;strategy and maintain sufficient cash flow and capital structure to support our business;

the loss of key officers and management personnel that could adversely affect our ability to remain competitive;

 

the effect of recognition by us of an impairment to goodwill;

the effect of control by our existing majority stockholder; and

 

the effect of adjustments by us to accruals for self-insured retentions.

 

Other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are more fully described in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this filing. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “AMN Healthcare,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

Risk Factors

The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating us and the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our company, operating results, financial condition and the actual outcome of matters as to which forward- looking statements are made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain statements in “Risk Factors” constitute “forward-looking statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors and uncertainties set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

If we are unable to attract and retain healthcare professionals for our healthcare staffing business at reasonable costs, it could increase our operating costs and negatively impact our business.

We rely significantly on our ability to attract and retain healthcare professionals who possess the skills, experience and licenses necessary to meet the requirements of our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We compete for healthcare staffing personnel with other temporary healthcare staffing companies and with hospitals and healthcare facilities based on the quantity, diversity and quality of assignments offered, compensation packages and the benefits that we provide to our healthcare professionals. We must continually evaluate and expand our temporary healthcare professional network to keep pace with our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ needs.

Currently, there is a shortage of qualified nurses in most areas of the United States, competition for nursing personnel is increasing, and salaries and benefits have risen. We may be unable to continue to increase the number of temporary healthcare professionals that we recruit, decreasing the potential for growth of our business. Our ability to attract and retain temporary healthcare professionals depends on several factors, including our ability to provide temporary healthcare professionals with assignments that they view as attractive and to provide them with competitive wages and benefits, including health insurance and housing. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in any of these areas as the costs of attracting temporary healthcare professionals and providing them with attractive benefit packages may be higher than we anticipate, or we may be unable to pass these costs on to our hospital and healthcare facility clients. If we are unable to increase the rates that we charge our hospital and healthcare facility clients to cover these costs, our profitability could decline. Moreover, if we are unable to attract and retain temporary healthcare professionals, the quality of our services to our hospital and healthcare facility clients may decline and, as a result, we could lose clients.

We operate in a highly competitive market and our success depends on our ability to remain competitive in obtaining and retaining hospital and healthcare facility clients and demonstrating the value of our services.

The temporary healthcare staffing business is highly competitive. We compete in national, regional and local markets with full-service staffing companies, specialized temporary staffing agencies and hospital systems that have developed their own interim staffing pools. Some of our larger competitors in the temporary nurse staffing sector include Cross Country, InteliStaf/StarMed, CompHealth Group/RN Network, Medical Staffing Network and On Assignment. Some of these companies may have greater marketing and financial resources.

We believe that the primary competitive factors in obtaining and retaining hospital and healthcare facility clients are identifying qualified healthcare professionals for specific job requirements, providing qualified employees in a timely manner, pricing services competitively and effectively monitoring employees’ job performance. Competition for hospital and healthcare facility clients and temporary healthcare professionals may increase in the future due to these factors or a shortage of qualified healthcare professionals in the marketplace and, as a result, we may not be able to remain competitive. To the extent competitors seek to gain or retain market share by reducing prices or increasing marketing expenditures, we could lose revenue or hospital and healthcare facility clients and our margins could decline, which could seriously harm our operating results and cause the price of our stock to decline. In addition, the development of alternative recruitment channels could lead our hospital and healthcare facility clients to bypass our services, which would also cause revenue and margins to decline.

Our business depends upon our ability to secure and fill new orders from our hospital and healthcare facility clients because we do not have long-term, exclusive or guaranteed contracts with them, and economic conditions may adversely impact the number of new orders and contracts we receive from our healthcare facility clients.

We generally do not have long-term, exclusive or guaranteed order contracts with our hospital and healthcare facility clients. The success of our business is dependent upon our ability to continually secure new

contracts and orders from hospitals and other healthcare facilities and to fill those orders with our temporary healthcare professionals. Our hospital and healthcare facility clients are free to award contracts and place orders with our competitors and choose to use temporary healthcare professionals that our competitors offer them. Therefore, we must maintain positive relationships with our hospital and healthcare facility clients. If we fail to maintain positive relationships with our hospital and healthcare facility clients or are unable to provide a cost-effective staffing solution, we may be unable to generate new temporary healthcare professional orders and our business may be adversely affected.

Some hospitals and healthcare facility clients choose to outsource this contract and order function to staffing associations owned by member healthcare facilities and companies with vendor management services that may act as intermediaries with our client facilities. These organizations may impact our ability to obtain new clients and maintain our existing client relationships by impeding our ability to access and contract directly with healthcare facility clients. Additionally, we may experience pricing pressure or incremental fees from these organizations that may negatively impact our revenue and profitability.

Depressed economic conditions, such as increasing unemployment rates and low job growth, could also negatively influence our ability to secure new orders and contracts from hospital and healthcare facility clients. In times of economic downturn, permanent healthcare facility staff may be more inclined to work overtime and less likely to leave their positions, resulting in fewer available vacancies, and less demand for our services. Fewer placement opportunities for our temporary healthcare professionals also impairs our ability to recruit temporary healthcare professionals and our revenues and profitability may decline as a result of this constricted demand and supply.

The demand for our services, and therefore the profitability of our business, may be adversely affected by changes in the staffing needs due to fluctuations in hospital admissions or staffing preferences of our healthcare facility clients.

The temporary healthcare staffing industry grew from 1996 through 2002, and declined in 2003. Demand for our temporary healthcare staffing services, which stabilized from April 2003 through late 2003 and increased each quarter in 2004, is significantly affected by the staffing needs and preferences of our healthcare facility clients, as well as by fluctuations in patient occupancy at our client healthcare facilities. Our healthcare facility clients may choose to use temporary staff, additional overtime from their permanent staff or add new permanent staff in order to accommodate changes in their staffing needs. As patient occupancy decreases, healthcare facility clients typically will reduce their use of temporary staff before reducing the workload or undertaking layoffs of their regular employees. In addition, we may experience more competitive pricing pressure during periods of occupancy downturn.

Patient occupancy at our client healthcare facilities fluctuates due to economic factors and seasonal fluctuations that are beyond our control. Hospitals in certain geographical regions experience significant seasonal fluctuations in admissions, and must be able to adjust their staffing levels to accommodate the change in patient census. Many healthcare facilities will utilize temporary healthcare professionals to accommodate an increase in hospital admissions. Alternatively, if hospital admissions decrease, the demand for our temporary healthcare professionals may decline, resulting in decreased revenues. In addition, we may experience more competitive pricing pressure during periods of patient occupancy and hospital admission downturns, negatively impacting our revenue and profitability.

We operate in a regulated industry and changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce revenue and profitability and may impact our ability to grow and operate our business.

The healthcare industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state laws and regulations related to professional licensure, conduct of operations, costs and payment for services and payment for referrals.

Our business is generally not subject to the extensive and complex laws that apply to our hospital and healthcare facility clients, including laws related to Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. However, these laws and regulations could indirectly affect the demand or the prices paid for our services. For example, our hospital and healthcare facility clients could suffer civil and/or criminal penalties and/ or be excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other healthcare programs if they fail to comply with the laws and regulations applicable to their businesses.

In addition, our hospital and healthcare facility clients could receive reduced reimbursements, or be excluded from coverage, because of a change in the rates or conditions set by federal or state governments. In turn, violations of or changes to these laws and regulations that adversely affect our hospital and healthcare facility clients could also adversely affect the prices that these clients are willing or able to pay for our services. For example, legislation in Massachusetts limited the hourly rate paid to temporary nursing agencies for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and certified nurses aides. While we are exempt from this regulation, in part, similar regulations may be enacted in other states in which we operate, and as a result revenue and margins could decrease. Furthermore, third party payors, such as health maintenance organizations, increasingly challenge the prices charged for medical care. Failure by hospitals and other healthcare facilities to obtain full reimbursement from those third party payors could reduce the demand or the price paid for our services.

We are also subject to certain laws and regulations applicable to healthcare staffing agencies and general temporary staffing services. Like all employers, we must also comply with various laws and regulations relating to pay practices, workers compensation and immigration. Because of the nature of our business, the impact of a change in these laws and regulations may have a more pronounced effect on our business. These laws and regulations may also impede our ability to grow our operations. We primarily draw our supply of temporary healthcare professionals from the United States, but international supply channels have represented a small but growing supply source. Our ability to recruit healthcare professionals through these foreign supply channels may be impacted by government legislation limiting the number of immigrant visas that can be issued.

Additionally, we have incurred and will continue to incur additional legal and accounting expenses related to compliance with corporate governance and disclosure standards implemented by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulations promulgated in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require an annual and quarterly review by management and evaluation of our internal control systems, in addition to auditor attestation of the effectiveness of these systems, commencing with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, damages, civil and/or criminal penalties, injunctions and/or cease and desist orders may be imposed, which would negatively impact our business and operations. The increase in costs necessitated by compliance with the laws and regulations affecting our business reduces our overall profitability, and reduces the assets and resources available for utilization in the expansion of our business operations.

Our profitability is impacted by our ability to leverage our cost structure.

We have technology, operations and human capital infrastructures to support our existing business and contemplated growth. In the event that our business does not grow at the rate that we had anticipated,our inability to reduce these costs would impair our profitability. Additionally, if we are not able to capitalize on this infrastructure our earnings growth rate will be impacted.

Terrorist threats or attacks may disrupt or adversely affect our business operations.

Our business operations may be interrupted or adversely impacted in the United States and abroad in the event of a terrorist attack or heightened security alerts. Our temporary healthcare professionals may become reluctant to travel and may decline assignments based upon the perceived risk of terrorist activity, which would reduce our revenue and profitability. In addition, terrorist activity or threats may impede our access to our

management and information systems resulting in loss of revenue. We do not maintain insurance coverage against terrorist attacks.

Significant legal actions could subject us to substantial liabilities.

In recent years, our hospital and healthcare facility clients have become subject to an increasing number of legal actions alleging malpractice or related legal theories. Because our temporary healthcare professionals provide medical care and we provide credentialing of these healthcare professionals, claims may be brought against us and our temporary healthcare professionals relating to the recruitment and qualification of these healthcare professionals and the quality of medical care provided by our temporary healthcare professionals while on assignment at our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We and our temporary healthcare professionals are at times named in these lawsuits regardless of our contractual obligations, the competency of the healthcare professionals or the standard of care provided by our temporary healthcare professionals. In some instances, we are required to indemnify hospital and healthcare facility clients contractually against some or all of these potential legal actions. Also, because most of our temporary healthcare professionals are our employees, we may be subject to various employment claims and contractual disputes regarding the terms of a temporary healthcare professional’s employment.

We maintain various types of insurance coverage, including professional liability and employment practices, through insurance carriers, and we also self-insure for these claims through accruals for retention reserves. We may experience increased insurance costs and reserve accruals and may not be able to pass on all or any portion of increased insurance costs to our hospital and healthcare facility clients, thereby reducing our profitability. Our insurance coverage and reserve accruals may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us, and we may be exposed to substantial liabilities.

We may be legally liable for damages resulting from our hospital and healthcare facility clients’ improper treatment of our traveling healthcare personnel.

Because we are in the business of placing our temporary healthcare professionals in the workplaces of other companies, we are subject to possible claims by our temporary healthcare professionals alleging discrimination, sexual harassment and other similar activities by our hospital and healthcare facility clients. We maintain a policy for employee practices coverage. However, the cost of defending such claims, even if groundless, could be substantial and the associated negative publicity could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain qualified individuals in the future.

We may not be able to successfully complete the integration of our acquisitions.

We continue to explore strategic acquisition opportunities. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including difficulties integrating acquired personnel and other corporate cultures into our business, the potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies, the assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies and the diversion of management attention from existing operations. We may not be able to fully integrate the operations of the acquired businesses with our own in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Acquisitions may also require significant expenditures of cash and other resources and assumption of debt that may ultimately negatively impact our overall financial performance.

Difficulties in maintaining our management information and communications systems may result in increased costs that reduce our profitability.

Our ability to deliver our staffing services to our hospital and healthcare facility clients and manage our internal systems depends to a large extent upon our access to and the performance of our management information and communications systems. These systems also maintain accounting and financial information, which we depend upon to fulfill our financial reporting obligations. If these systems do not adequately support

our operations, these systems are damaged or if we are required to incur significant additional costs to repair, maintain or expand these systems, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected. Although we have risk mitigation measures, these systems, and our access to these systems, are not impervious to floods, fire, storms, or natural disasters, and the loss of systems information could result in disruption to our business.

Our operations may deteriorate if we are unable to continue to attract, develop and retain our sales and operations personnel.

Our success is dependent upon the performance of our sales and operations personnel, especially regional client service directors, hospital account managers and recruiters. The number of individuals who meet our qualifications for these positions is limited, and we may experience difficulty in attracting qualified candidates. In addition, we commit substantial resources to the training, development and support of our personnel. Competition for qualified sales personnel in the line of business in which we operate is strong, and there is a risk that we may not be able to retain our sales personnel after we have expended the time and expense to recruit and train them.

The loss of key senior management personnel could adversely affect our ability to remain competitive.

We believe that the success of our business strategy and our ability to operate profitably depends on the continued employment of our senior management team. Other than Steven Francis, our Chief Executive Officer, none of our senior management team has an employment contract with us. If members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

Our existing majority stockholder has significant control over us.

HWH Capital Partners, L.P. and some of its affiliates, whom we refer to collectively as the “HWP stockholders,” beneficially currently own approximately 45.6% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, the HWP stockholders have significant influence in electing our directors and approving any action requiring the approval of shareholders, including any amendments to our certificate of incorporation, mergers or sales of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership also may delay, defer or even prevent a change in control of our company, and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. These transactions might include proxy contests, tender offers, mergers or other purchases of common stock that could give our stockholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for shares of our common stock.

We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet that may have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in the event that we are required to recognize an impairment to goodwill.

As of December 31, 2004, we had $135.4 million of unamortized goodwill on our balance sheet, which represents the excess of the total purchase price of our acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets acquired. At December 31, 2004, goodwill represented 47% of our total assets.

Through December 31, 2001, we amortized goodwill on a straight-line basis over the estimated period of future benefit of 25 years. In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, as well as all purchase method business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 requires that, subsequent to January 1, 2002, goodwill not be amortized but rather that it be reviewed annually for impairment. In the event impairment is identified, a charge to earnings would be recorded. Although an impairment charge to earnings for goodwill would not affect our cash flow, it would decrease our earnings or increase our losses, as the case may be, and our

stock price could be adversely affected. We have reviewed our goodwill for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, and have not identified any impairment to goodwill.

We have a substantial accrual for self-insured retentions on our balance sheet, and any significant adverse adjustments in these accruals may have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses.

We maintain accruals for self-insured retentions on our balance sheet. Increases to these accruals do not affect our cash flow, but a significant increase to these self-insured retention accruals may decrease our earnings or increase our losses, as the case may be. We determine the adequacy of our self-insured retention accruals by evaluating our historical experience and trends, related to both insurance claims and payments, information provided to us by our insurance brokers and third party administrators, as well as industry experience and trends. If such information indicates that our accruals are overstated or understated, we reduce or provide for additional accruals, as appropriate.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We do not believe that we have any material market risk exposure with respect to derivative or other financial instruments.

 

During 20042005 and 2003,2004, our primary exposure to market risk was interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financing Activities” for further description of our debt instruments and interest rate swaps. Excluding the effect of our interest rate swap arrangements, a 1% change in interest rates on our variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating approximately $1.1 million in 2005 and $1.5 million in 2004 and $0.3 million in 2003.2004.

 

Our international operations create exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risks. We believe that our foreign currency risk is immaterial.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

   Page

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

38

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  3937

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004

  4138

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

  4239

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

  4340

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

  4441

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  4542

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.

Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 10, 20059, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

San Diego, California

March 10, 2005

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Diego, California

March 10, 20059, 2006

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value)

 

  December 31,
2004


 December 31,
2003


   December 31,
2005


 

December 31,

2004


 
ASSETS        

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $3,908  $4,687   $19,110  $3,908 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,752 and $3,342 at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively

   108,825   117,392 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,375 and $1,752 at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively

   154,926   108,825 

Prepaid expenses

   11,703   14,027    12,763   11,703 

Income tax receivable

   8,311   —   

Deferred income taxes, net

   1,210   864    31,305   1,210 

Other current assets

   1,759   1,835    1,848   1,759 
  


 


  


 


Total current assets

   127,405   138,805    228,263   127,405 

Fixed assets, net

   17,833   18,414    20,164   17,833 

Deferred income taxes, net

   508   5,207    —     508 

Deposits and other assets

   2,265   1,635    7,964   2,265 

Goodwill, net

   135,449   135,532    240,844   135,449 

Other intangibles, net

   3,500   4,939 

Intangible assets, net

   121,152   3,500 
  


 


  


 


Total assets

  $286,960  $304,532   $618,387  $286,960 
  


 


  


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          

Current liabilities:

      

Bank overdraft

  $1,093  $—     $—    $1,093 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   13,084   12,954    19,092   8,309 

Accrued compensation and benefits

   29,970   32,117    32,208   24,595 

Income taxes payable

   790   2,103    —     790 

Current portion of notes payable

   4,863   13,400    10,250   4,863 

Deferred revenue

   7,610   —   

Other current liabilities

   351   385    59,018   351 
  


 


  


 


Total current liabilities

   50,151   60,959    128,178   40,001 

Notes payable, less current portion

   96,860   125,500    194,750   96,860 

Deferred income taxes, net

   65,132   —   

Other long-term liabilities

   3,173   1,976    37,127   13,323 
  


 


  


 


Total liabilities

   150,184   188,435    425,187   150,184 
  


 


  


 


Commitments and contingencies

      

Stockholders’ equity:

      

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized; 43,221 and 42,997 shares issued at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively

   432   430 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized; 43,747 and 43,221 shares issued at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively

   437   432 

Additional paid-in capital

   352,456   349,595    355,762   352,456 

Treasury stock, at cost (14,877 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003)

   (249,538)  (249,428)

Treasury stock, at cost (12,551 and 14,877 shares at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively)

   (210,529)  (249,538)

Retained earnings

   33,155   15,809    47,784   33,155 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   271   (309)   (254)  271 
  


 


  


 


Total stockholders’ equity

   136,776   116,097    193,200   136,776 
  


 


  


 


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $286,960  $304,532   $618,387  $286,960 
  


 


  


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  Years Ended December 31,

   Years Ended December 31,

  2004

  2003

  2002

   2005

  2004

  2003

Revenue

  $629,016  $714,209  $775,683   $705,843  $629,016  $714,209

Cost of revenue

   484,654   552,052   586,900    535,608   484,654   552,052
  

  

  


  

  

  

Gross profit

   144,362   162,157   188,783    170,235   144,362   162,157
  

  

  


  

  

  

Operating expenses:

                  

Selling, general and administrative, excluding non-cash stock-based compensation

   101,436   92,500   97,666    117,184   101,436   92,500

Non-cash stock-based compensation

   750   874   874    142   750   874

Depreciation and amortization

   5,837   4,819   3,839    6,179   5,837   4,819

Transaction costs

   —     —     139 
  

  

  


  

  

  

Total operating expenses

   108,023   98,193   102,518    123,505   108,023   98,193
  

  

  


  

  

  

Income from operations

   36,339   63,964   86,265    46,730   36,339   63,964

Interest expense (income), net

   8,440   2,303   (343)   9,565   8,440   2,303
  

  

  


  

  

  

Income before income taxes

   27,899   61,661   86,608    37,165   27,899   61,661

Income tax expense

   10,553   23,869   34,252    14,931   10,553   23,869
  

  

  


  

  

  

Net income

  $17,346  $37,792  $52,356   $22,234  $17,346  $37,792
  

  

  


  

  

  

Net income per common share:

                  

Basic

  $0.61  $1.04  $1.23   $0.76  $0.61  $1.04
  

  

  


  

  

  

Diluted

  $0.55  $0.95  $1.12   $0.69  $0.55  $0.95
  

  

  


  

  

  

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

                  

Basic

   28,248   36,456   42,534 ��  29,130   28,248   36,456
  

  

  


  

  

  

Diluted

   31,369   39,785   46,805    32,118   31,369   39,785
  

  

  


  

  

  

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

(in thousands)

 

  Common Stock

  

Additional

Paid-in
Capital


  Treasury
Stock


  Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)


  

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

(Loss)


  

Total


   Common Stock

  Additional
Paid-in
Capital


  Treasury
Stock


  

Retained

Earnings

(Accumulated

Deficit)


  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)


    
  Shares

  Amount

   

Balance, December 31, 2001

  42,290  $423  $345,821  $—    $(74,339) $—    $271,905 

Issuance costs of common stock

  —     —     (1,080)  —     —     —     (1,080)

Repurchase of common stock into treasury

  —     —     —     (35,164)  —     —     (35,164)

Exercise of stock options

  701   7   3,176   —     —     —     3,183 

Income tax benefit from stock option exercises

  —     —     3,750   —     —     —     3,750 

Stock-based compensation

  —     —     874   —     —     —     874 

Net income

  —     —     —     —     52,356   —     52,356 
         


Total comprehensive income

          52,356 
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


  Shares

  Amount

  Additional
Paid-in
Capital


  Treasury
Stock


  

Retained

Earnings

(Accumulated

Deficit)


  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)


  Total

 

Balance, December 31, 2002

  42,991   430   352,541   (35,164)  (21,983)  —     295,824   42,991  $430   $295,824 

Repurchase of common stock into treasury

  —     —     (3,872)  (214,264)  —     —     (218,136)  —     —     (3,872)  (214,264)  —     —     (218,136)

Exercise of stock options

  6   —     52   —     —     —     52   6   —     52   —     —     —     52 

Stock-based compensation

  —     —     874   —     —     —     874   —     —     874   —     —     —     874 

Comprehensive income (loss):

                  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  —     —     —     —     —     (111)  (111)  —     —     —     —     —     (111)  (111)

Unrealized loss for derivative financial instruments, net of tax

  —     —     —     —     —     (198)  (198)  —     —     —     —     —     (198)  (198)
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


Net income

  —     —     —     —     37,792   —     37,792   —     —     —     —     37,792   —     37,792 
         


         


Total comprehensive income

          37,483           37,483 
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


  
  

  


 


 


 


 


Balance, December 31, 2003

  42,997   430   349,595   (249,428)  15,809   (309)  116,097   42,997   430   349,595   (249,428)  15,809   (309)  116,097 

Transaction costs related to 2003 repurchase of common stock into treasury

  —     —     —     (110)  —     —     (110)  —     —     —     (110)  —     —     (110)

Exercise of stock options

  224   2   2,041   —     —     —     2,043   224   2   2,041   —     —     —     2,043 

Income tax benefit from stock option exercises

  —     —     70   —     —     —     70   —     —     70   —     —     —     70 

Stock-based compensation

  —     —     750   —     —     —     750   —     —     750   —     —     —     750 

Comprehensive income (loss):

                  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  —     —     —     —     —     (8)  (8)  —     —     —     —     —     (8)  (8)

Unrealized gain for derivative financial instruments, net of tax

  —     —     —     —     —     588   588 

Unrealized loss for derivative financial instruments, net of tax

  —     —     —     —     —     588   588 
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


Net income

  —     —     —     —     17,346   —     17,346   —     —     —     —     17,346   —     17,346 
         


         


Total comprehensive income

          17,926           17,926 
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


  
  

  


 


 


 


 


Balance, December 31, 2004

  43,221  $432  $352,456  $(249,538) $33,155  $271  $136,776   43,221   432   352,456   (249,538)  33,155   271   136,776 

Issuance costs of common stock

  —     —     —     —     (544)  —     (544)

Issuance of treasury stock

  —     —     —     39,009   (7,061)  —     31,948 

Exercise of stock options

  526   5   2,855   —     —     —     2,860 

Income tax benefit from stock option exercises

  —     —     309   —     —     —     309 

Stock-based compensation

  —     —     142   —     —     —     142 

Comprehensive income (loss):

         

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  —     —     —     —     —     (82)  (82)

Unrealized gain for derivative financial instruments, net of tax

  —     —     —     —     —     (443)  (443)
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


  
  

  


 


 


 


 


Net income

  —     —     —     —     22,234   —     22,234 
         


Total comprehensive income

          21,709 
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


Balance, December 31, 2005

  43,747  $437  $355,762  $(210,529) $47,784  $(254) $193,200 
  
  

  


 


 


 


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 Years Ended December 31,

   Years Ended December 31,

 
 2004

 2003

 2002

   2005

 2004

 2003

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

 $17,346  $37,792  $52,356   $22,234  $17,346  $37,792 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, net of effects from acquisition:

    

Depreciation and amortization

  5,837   4,819   3,839    6,179   5,837   4,819 

Provision for (recovery of) bad debts

  173   (315)  2,833    1,738   173   (315)

Noncash interest expense

  1,449   550   370    2,747   1,449   550 

Provision for deferred income taxes

  4,086   6,040   7,295    19,017   4,086   6,040 

Non-cash stock-based compensation

  750   874   874    142   750   874 

Stock-based compensation in connection with tender offer

  —     1,128   —      —     —     1,128 

Loss on disposal or sale of fixed assets

  81   236   228 

(Gain) loss on disposal or sale of fixed assets

   (9)  81   236 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition:

    

Accounts receivable

  8,394   17,379   (30,147)   (474)  8,394   17,379 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  2,792   (1,800)  668    1,829   2,792   (1,800)

Deposits and other assets

  (370)  (223)  (732)   (1,463)  (370)  (223)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  130   216   3,663    (1,204)  (764)  (2,864)

Accrued compensation and benefits

  (2,147)  (2,371)  10,198    560   (2,423)  (2,411)

Income taxes payable

  (1,152)  444   5,408    (10,467)  (1,152)  444 

Other liabilities

  1,669   376   —      3,261   2,839   3,496 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash provided by operating activities

  39,038   65,145   56,853    44,090   39,038   65,145 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from sale of short-term investments

  —     —     16,314 

Purchase and development of fixed assets

  (5,061)  (13,013)  (4,328)   (3,818)  (5,061)  (13,013)

Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash received

  —     —     (9,534)

Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash received

   (111,508)  —     —   

Cash paid under deferred purchase agreement

  —     (1,000)  (1,000)   —     —     (1,000)
 


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  (5,061)  (14,013)  1,452 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (115,326)  (5,061)  (14,013)
 


 


 


  


 


 


Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Capital lease repayments

  (339)  (304)  (244)   (364)  (339)  (304)

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

  —     145,000   —      205,000   —     145,000 

Payment of financing costs

  (258)  (4,628)  (101)   (4,904)  (258)  (4,628)

Payments on notes payable

  (37,177)  (6,100)  —      (107,218)  (37,177)  (6,100)

Repurchase of common stock and options, including transaction costs

  (110)  (219,264)  (35,164)   —     (110)  (219,264)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

  2,043   52   2,103    2,316   2,043   52 

Change in bank overdraft, net of effects of acquisition

  1,093   (1,225)  (418)   (8,310)  1,093   (1,225)
 


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash used in financing activities

  (34,748)  (86,469)  (33,824)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   86,520   (34,748)  (86,469)
 


 


 


  


 


 


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

  (8)  (111)  —      (82)  (8)  (111)
 


 


 


  


 


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (779)  (35,448)  24,481    15,202   (779)  (35,448)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  4,687   40,135   15,654    3,908   4,687   40,135 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $3,908  $4,687  $40,135   $19,110  $3,908  $4,687 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

    

Cash paid for interest (net of $32, $0 and $0 capitalized in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively)

 $7,354  $2,003  $254 

Cash paid for interest (net of $39, $32 and $0 capitalized in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively)

  $7,070  $7,354  $2,003 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Cash paid for income taxes

 $7,584  $17,385  $16,864   $6,354  $7,584  $17,385 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Fixed assets acquired through capital leases

 $28  $207  $1,307   $591  $28  $207 
 


 


 


  


 


 


Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment and unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments, net of tax

 $580  $(309) $—     $(525) $580  $(309)
 


 


 


  


 


 


Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions, net of cash received

 $—    $—    $2,074   $84,141  $—    $—   

Goodwill

  —     —     7,780    105,395   —     —   

Noncompete covenants

  —     —     208 

Intangible assets

   115,650   —     —   

Liabilities assumed

  —     —     (528)   (57,807)  —     —   

Holdback provision

   (13,904)  —     —   

Accrued earn-out

   (45,831)  —     —   

Deferred tax liability

   (44,188)  —     —   

Treasury stock issued

   (31,948)  —     —   
 


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash paid for acquisitions

 $—    $—    $9,534   $111,508  $—    $—   
 


 


 


  


 


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

 

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

(a) General

 

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on November 10, 1997. AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries recruit and place physicians, nurses and allied health professionals nationally and place theminternationally on a temporary assignmentsor permanent basis at acute-care hospitals and other healthcare facilities throughout the United States. AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively are herein referred to as “the Company.”Company”.

On November 2, 2005, the Company completed its acquisition of The MHA Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, a Texas corporation (“MHA”). MHA, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, provides temporary physician, nurse and allied healthcare staffing services as well as physician and allied healthcare permanent placement services.

 

(b) Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include currency on hand, deposits with financial institutions and highly liquid investments. At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company held $303,000$310,000 and $300,000,$303,000, respectively, in a collateral trust account restricted for use related to a professional liability insurance agreement. Cash and cash equivalents were $19,110,000 and $3,908,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

(d) Fixed Assets

 

Furniture, equipment, leasehold improvements and software are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization and depreciation. Equipment acquired under capital leases is recorded at the present value of the future minimum lease payments. Major additions and improvements are capitalized and maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred. Depreciation on furniture, equipment and software is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets (generally three to five years). Leasehold improvements and equipment obtained under capital leases are amortized over the shorter of the term of the lease or their estimated useful life. Amortization of equipment obtained under capital leases is included inwith depreciation expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

 

Costs incurred to develop internal-use software during the application development stage are capitalized and recorded at cost, subject to an impairment test as described below. Application development stage costs generally include costs associated with internal-use software configuration, coding, installation and testing. Costs of significant upgrades and enhancements that result in additional functionality also are capitalized, whereas costs incurred for maintenance and minor upgrades and enhancements are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over three or five years once placed into service. The Company assesses potential impairment of capitalized internal-use software quarterly or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted net cash

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

flows that are expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

 

(e) Goodwill

 

The excess of purchase price and related costs over the fair value of net assets of entities acquired is recorded as goodwill. In accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company evaluates goodwill annually for impairment at the reporting unit level and whenever circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

As The performance of January 1, 2002,the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the Company’s reporting units with the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company generally determines the fair value of its reporting units using the expected present value of future cash flows, giving consideration to the market valuation approach. If the carrying amount of the Company’s reporting units exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 and had unamortizedperforms the second step of the goodwill of $127,752,000 and unamortized identifiable intangible assets, excluding deferred financing costs, inimpairment test to determine the amount of $871,000, allimpairment loss. The second step of which were subject to the transition provisionsgoodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of SFAS Nos. 141the Company’s reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. At December 31, 2005 and 142. The2004, the Company performed the two-step transitional goodwillannual impairment test and determined there was no impairment as of January 1, 2002. The Company also re-evaluated the classifications of its existing intangible assets and goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 141 and determined that the current classifications conform to the criteria in SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 142 requires the impairment test be applied to the relevant “reporting unit” which may differ from the specific entities acquired from which the goodwill arose. Due to the integrated nature of the Company’s operations and lack of differing economic characteristics among the Company’s subsidiaries, the entire Company was determined to be one single reporting unit. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company performed the annual impairment test using a market value method and determined there was no impairment of goodwill.

 

(f) Other IntangiblesIntangible Assets

 

Other intangiblesIntangible assets consist of identifiable intangible assets acquired through the Company’s acquisition of The MHA Group, Inc. (“MHA”) in November 2005, debt issuance costs related to the Company’s credit facility and other noncompete covenants.covenants from previous acquisitions. Identifiable intangible assets acquired through the acquisition of MHA include tradenames and trademarks, customer relationships, noncompete agreements and staffing databases. Amortizable intangible assets, which do not include those tradenames and trademarks with an indefinite life, are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful lives. Debt issuance costs are deferred and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the respective term of the credit facility. Noncompete covenants, were recordedincluding those acquired through the acquisition of MHA, as a result ofwell as other acquisitions, and are amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the related agreements.

 

(g) Insurance Reserves

 

The Company maintains an accrual for incurred, but not reported, claims arising from self-insured health benefits provided to the Company’s temporary healthcare professionals, which is included in accrued compensation and benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company determines the adequacy of this accrual by evaluating its historical experience and trends related to both health insurance claims and payments, information provided by their insurance broker and third party administrator, as well as industry experience and trends. If such information indicates that the accruals are overstated or understated, the Company reduces or provides for additional accruals. The Company’s accrual at December 31, 20042005 was based on (i) a monthly average of the Company’s actual historical health insurance claim amounts and (ii) the average period of time from the date the claim is incurred to the date that it is reported to the Company and paid. The Company believes this is the best estimate of the amount of incurred, but not reported, self-insured health benefit claims at year-end. As of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, the Company had $2.3$2.4 million and $3.5$2.3 million, respectively, accrued for incurred, but not reported, health insurance claims.

 

The Company maintains an accrual for professional liability self-insured retention limits, net of insurance recoverable, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. The

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Company determines the adequacy of this accrual by evaluating its historical experience and trends, loss reserves established by the Company’s insurance carriers, management and third partythird-party administrators, as well as through the use of independent actuarial studies. The Company obtains updated actuarial studies on a semi-annualregular basis that use actual claims data to determine the appropriate reserves for incurred, but not reported, professional liability claims for each year. Due to the varied historical claims loss experience, the Company’s actuary provides a range of incurred, but not reported, claim reserves. The range for the total professional liability reserve at December 31, 2004, which incorporated the range for incurred, but not reported, claims provided by the Company’s actuaries, was between $7.0 million and $8.4 million. As of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, the Company had $7.0$13.9 million and $3.9$7.0 million, respectively, accrued for professional liability retention. Becauseretention of which the Company’s varied loss history, therecurrent portion is no amount within$1.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The increase in the range that management orreserve is primarily due to the actuaries believeacquisition of MHA which is a better estimate than any other amount. As such, the Company accrued the low end of the range at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)also self-insured for professional liability.

 

The Company maintains an accrual for workers compensation self-insured retention limits, which is included in accrued compensation and benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company determines the adequacy of this accrual by evaluating its historical experience and trends, loss reserves established by the Company’s insurance carriers and third party administrators, as well as through the use of independent actuarial studies. The Company obtains updated actuarial studies on a semi-annual basis that use actual claims data to determine the appropriate reserve both for reported claims and incurred, but not reported, claims for each policy year. The actuarial study for workers compensation provides the Company with the estimated losses for prior policy years and an estimated percentage of payroll compensation to be accrued for current years. The Company records its accruals based on the amounts provided in the actuarial study and believes this is the best estimate of the Company’s liability for reported claims and incurred, but not reported, claims as of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003.2004. As of December 31, 20042005 and December 31, 2003,2004, the Company had $8.1$10.1 million and $7.6$8.1 million, respectively, accrued for workers compensation claims.claims of which the current portion is $3.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively.

 

(h) Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated credit losses resulting from collection risks, including the inability of customers to make required payments. This results in a provision for bad debt expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reported as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. The adequacy of this allowance is determined by evaluating the credit risk for individual customer receivables, considering the financial condition of each customer and historical payment trends, delinquency trends, credit histories of customers and current economic conditions. If the financial condition of a customer were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be provided.

 

(i) Concentration of Credit Risk

 

The majority of the Company’s business activity is with hospitals located throughout the United States. Credit is extended based on the evaluation of each entity’s financial condition, and collateral is generally not required. Credit losses have been within management’s expectations. No single facility customerclient healthcare system exceeded 10% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

 

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are also financial instruments that are exposed to concentration of credit risk. The Company places its cash balances with high-credit quality and federally insured institutions. Cash balances with any one institution may be in excess of federally insured limits or may be invested in a non-federally insured money market account.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

(j) Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue consists of services provided byfees earned from the Company’spermanent and temporary placement of healthcare professionals. Revenue is recognized when earned and realizable and therefore when the following criteria have been met: (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (b) services have been rendered; (c) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectibility is reasonably assured. For temporary placements, revenue is recognized in the period in which services are provided based on hours worked by the temporary healthcare professionals. For permanent placements, revenue is recognized over the estimated maximum period of performance on a straight-line basis. Any fees that are billable on a contingent basis are recognized once the contingency is resolved over the remaining estimated maximum period of performance. Billings in excess of revenue are recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

(k) Advertising Expenses

 

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were $8,166,000, $8,132,000 and $8,463,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

(l) Income Taxes

 

The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period the changes are enacted. If it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is recognized.

 

(m) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows that are expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

 

(n) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, income tax receivable, bank overdraft, accounts payable and accrued expenses, accrued compensation and benefits, income taxes payable and other current liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature and liquidity of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts of notes payable approximate their fair value, as the instruments’ interest rates are comparable to rates currently offered for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value based on dealer quotes. The long-term portion of the acquisition price holdback liability is recorded at its fair value, using the discounted cash flow method. The fair value of the long-term portion of the Company’s self insurance accruals cannot be estimated as the Company cannot reasonably determine the timing of future payments.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

(o) Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44,Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25, and EITF 00-23,Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44, to account for its stock option plans. Under this method, compensation expense for fixed plans is recognized only if, on the date of grant, the then current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price, and is recorded on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. Compensation expense for variable plans is measured at the end of each reporting period until the related performance criteria are met and is measured based on the excess of the then current market price of the underlying stock over the exercise price. Compensation expense previously recorded for unvested employee stock-based compensation awards that are forfeited upon employee termination is reversed in the period of forfeiture. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

The following table compares net income and net income per share as reported by the Company to the pro forma amounts that would be reported had compensation expense been recognized for the Company’s stock-based compensation plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  Years Ended December 31,

  Years Ended December 31,

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

As reported:

                  

Net income

  $17,346  $37,792  $52,356  $22,234  $17,346  $37,792
  

  

  

  

  

  

Stock-based employee compensation, net of tax

  $466  $1,227  $529  $85  $466  $1,227
  

  

  

  

  

  

Net income per common share:

                  

Basic

  $0.61  $1.04  $1.23  $0.76  $0.61  $1.04
  

  

  

  

  

  

Diluted

  $0.55  $0.95  $1.12  $0.69  $0.55  $0.95
  

  

  

  

  

  

Pro forma:

                  

Net income, as reported

  $17,346  $37,792  $52,356  $22,234  $17,346  $37,792

Incremental stock-based employee compensation per SFAS 123, net of tax

   2,003   2,062   1,542   3,575   2,003   2,062
  

  

  

  

  

  

Pro forma net income

  $15,343  $35,730  $50,814  $18,659  $15,343  $35,730
  

  

  

  

  

  

Pro forma net income per common share:

                  

Basic

  $0.54  $0.98  $1.19  $0.64  $0.54  $0.98
  

  

  

  

  

  

Diluted

  $0.49  $0.90  $1.09  $0.58  $0.49  $0.90
  

  

  

  

  

  

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

The weighted average per share fair value of options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $6.99, $7.39 and 2002 was $7.39, $5.21, and $12.45, respectively, on the date of grant. Fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

Expected life

  5 years  5 years  5 years  5 years  5 years  5 years

Risk-free interest rate

  3.50%  2.62%  2.78%  3.98%  3.50%  2.62%

Volatility

  54%  61%  62%  48%  54%  61%

Dividend yield

  0%  0%  0%  0%  0%  0%

 

(p) Net Income per Common Share

 

Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

 

Options to purchase 567,000, 651,000 and 655,000 shares of common stock in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were not included in the calculations of diluted net income per common share because the effect of these instruments was anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive options to purchase common stock in 2002.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  Years Ended December 31,

  Years Ended December 31,

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

Net income

  $17,346  $37,792  $52,356  $22,234  $17,346  $37,792
  

  

  

  

  

  

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

   28,248   36,456   42,534   29,130   28,248   36,456
  

  

  

  

  

  

Net income per common share—basic

  $0.61  $1.04  $1.23  $0.76  $0.61  $1.04
  

  

  

  

  

  

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

   28,248   36,456   42,534   29,130   28,248   36,456

Plus dilutive stock options

   3,121   3,329   4,271   2,988   3,121   3,329
  

  

  

  

  

  

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

   31,369   39,785   46,805   32,118   31,369   39,785
  

  

  

  

  

  

Net income per common share—diluted

  $0.55  $0.95  $1.12  $0.69  $0.55  $0.95
  

  

  

  

  

  

 

(q) Other Comprehensive Income (loss)

 

SFAS No. 130,Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes rulesstandards for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income (loss) includes items such as hedge effective gains and losses on derivative contracts and foreign currency translation adjustments. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, comprehensive income was $21,709,000, $17,926,000 and $37,483,000 and included an unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap arrangements, net of tax, of $(443,000), $588,000 and $(198,000), respectively, and a foreign currency translation adjustment loss of $82,000, $8,000 and $111,000, respectively. Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2002 was the same as the Company’s net income.

 

(r) Derivative Instruments

 

SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

those derivatives are accounted for depending upon the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The Company uses derivative instruments to manage the fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk on variable-rate debt financing.

 

In October 2003, in connection with the amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Company entered into interest rate swap arrangements to minimize exposure to interest rate fluctuations on $110$30 million of the outstanding variable rate debt under the amendedexisting credit facility. facility, where the Company pays a fixed rate of 2.65% and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. This agreement expires in September 2006, and no initial investment was made to enter into this agreement. In June 2005, the Company entered into two additional interest rate swaps. The first agreement has a notional amount of $20 million and became effective in September 2005, whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 3.99% and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. The agreement expires in March 2007. The second agreement will become effective in September 2006, with a notional amount of $15 million whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 4.09% and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. This agreement will expire in September 2007. In November 2005 the Company entered into five additional interest rate swap agreements for notional amounts of $15 million, $10 million, $30 million, $35 million and $50 million, whereby the Company pays fixed rates of 4.82%, 4.95%, 4.87%, 4.94%, and 4.97%, respectively, and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. These agreements expire in December 2007, June 2008, December 2008, December 2009 and December 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the interest rate swap arrangements minimizing exposure on $80agreements had a fair value of ($0.1) million ofand $0.7 million, respectively, which is included in other assets and liabilities in the variable rate debt remain.accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company has formally documented the hedging relationships and accounts for these arrangements as cash flow hedges. The Company recognizes all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value based on dealer quotes. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of these arrangements are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in the hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively and recognizes subsequent changes in market value in earnings.

 

(s) New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFASStatement No. 123 (Revised),Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123R)(“FAS 123R”), which amends SFASStatement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APBAccounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25. SFAS No.25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. FAS 123R requires the measurement of

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

compensation cost related to all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such cost in a company’sthe Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, FAS 123R requires that estimated forfeitures be considered in determining compensation cost. The accounting provisions of SFAS No.FAS 123R are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company hasFAS 123R, which provides certain changes to the method for valuing share-based compensation, among other changes, will apply to new awards and to awards that are outstanding on the effective date that are subsequently modified or cancelled. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not yet determined its planned methodbeen rendered as of adoption orthe effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using compensation cost similar to that calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under FAS 123. Of the $11.9 million of unamortized compensation expense at December 31, 2005, before the effect of adopting SFAS No.income taxes related to outstanding unvested options, as determined in accordance with FAS 123, $5.1 million is expected to be recorded during fiscal 2006. The Company will likely incur additional expense during 2006 related to new awards granted during 2006 that cannot yet be quantified. The Company

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

adopted FAS 123R on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method, and therefore has not determined whether the adoptionCompany will resultvalue share-based awards granted after the effective date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is consistent with the valuation method previously used for footnote disclosure purposes in amounts similar to the pro forma amounts disclosed in Note 1(o).accordance with FAS 123.

 

(t) Segment Information

 

SFAS No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise’s operating segments and related disclosures about its products, services, geographic areas and major customers. An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenue and incur expenses, and for which discrete financial information is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.

 

The Company provides hospital and healthcare facilities with temporary staffing for physicians, nurses and allied healthcare professionals and other healthcare professionalspermanent physician placement services through the use of several brand names, each having their own marketing and supply distinction. The Company’s operating segments are identified in the same manner as they are reported internally and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker for the purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. For all periods presented, except for fiscal year 2005, the Company believes it operated in a single segment, healthcare staffing for hospitals and healthcare facilities. With the acquisition of MHA in November 2005, the Company has two reportable operating segments: nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment and physician staffing segment.

The Company’s management relies on internal management reporting processes that provide revenue and segment operating income for making financial decisions and allocating resources. Segment operating income includes income from operations before depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and amortization of stock compensation expense. Management believes that segment operating income is an appropriate measure of evaluating the operational performance of the Company’s segments. However, this measure should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, income from operations or other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s management does not evaluate, manage or measure performance of segments using asset information; accordingly, asset information by segment is not prepared or disclosed. The information in the following table is derived from the segment’s internal financial information as used for corporate management purposes.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table provides a reconciliation of revenue and segment operating income by reportable segment to consolidated results (in thousands):

   Years Ended December 31,

   2005

  2004

  2003

Revenue

            

Nurse and allied healthcare staffing

  $658,843  $629,016  $714,209

Physician staffing

   47,000   —     —  
   

  

  

   $705,843  $629,016  $714,209
   

  

  

Segment Operating Income

            

Nurse and allied healthcare staffing

  $48,256  $42,926  $69,657

Physician staffing

   4,795   —     —  
   

  

  

    53,051   42,926   69,657

Depreciation and amortization

   6,179   5,837   4,819

Non-cash stock-based compensation

   142   750   874

Interest expense, net

   9,565   8,440   2,303
   

  

  

Income before income taxes

  $37,165  $27,899  $61,661
   

  

  

 

(u) Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

(v) Reclassifications

 

Certain amounts in the 2004 and 2003 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 20042005 presentation.

 

(2) Acquisitions

MHA Acquisition

On November 2, 2005, the Company completed its acquisition of MHA. The acquisition established AMN as the largest provider of healthcare staffing services in the United States. The strategic combination has broadened the type of services the Company offers and will allow the Company to provide a more comprehensive staffing solution to clients. Because the Company possesses one of the largest national networks of available physician, nurse and allied health professionals, the Company is well positioned to offer our hospital and healthcare facility clients a spectrum of effective solutions to meet their staffing needs.

The acquisition was recorded using the purchase method of accounting. Thus, the results of operations from MHA are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date. The total purchase price of $210.0 million consisted of (i) an initial price of $160.0 million, paid approximately 75% in cash, excluding a $15.0 million holdback for potential claims indemnified by the MHA shareholders, and approximately 25% in unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, (ii) contingent purchase price of

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

$47.3 million, paid approximately 75% in cash and 25% in unregistered share of the Company’s common stock, and (iii) $2.7 million of direct acquisition costs. The purchase price included contingent consideration based on the financial performance of MHA for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005. The earn-out of $47.3 million was finalized on December 31, 2005 and recorded as additional purchase price at its fair value. The holdback, net of any indemnified claims made by the selling shareholders, will be released to the selling shareholders in March 2007. In addition to cash consideration paid, the Company issued 2.3 million unregistered shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition of MHA, and issued an additional 0.7 million unregistered shares on March 9, 2006 for payment of earn-out amounts as provided in the acquisition agreement. The cash and stock components of the earn-out and holdback, as well as the stock portion of the initial purchase price, have been recorded at their fair values, including discounts for restrictions on the marketability of the stock and the timing of expected future cash payments. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values was as follows (in thousands):

Purchase Price:

     

Cash paid for MHA common stock

  $108,140 

Cash holdback

   13,904 

Equity issued for MHA common stock

   31,948 

Earn-out—cash

   35,164 

Earn-out—equity

   10,667 

Transaction costs

   2,712 
   


Total purchase price of acquisition

  $202,535 
   


Assets Acquired:

     

Net assets acquired

  $27,240 

Identifiable intangible assets

   115,600 

Deferred tax liability and other liabilities

   (45,188)

Goodwill

   104,883 
   


Total assets acquired

  $202,535 
   


Intangible assets include amounts recognized for the fair value of tradenames and trademarks, customer relationships, non-compete agreements, and staffing databases. The following table summarizes the fair value and useful life of each intangible asset acquired:

   Fair Value

  Useful Life

   (in thousands)  (in years)

Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization:

       

Staffing databases

  $1,600  5

Customer relationships

   32,000  14

Tradenames and trademarks

   1,200  5

Noncompete agreements

   900  5
   

   
    35,700   

Identifiable intangible assets not subject to amortization:

       

Tradenames and trademarks

   79,900  indefinite
   

   

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired

  $115,600   
   

   

Of the total $104.9 million of the purchase price allocated to goodwill, $96.2 million and $8.7 million was allocated to the Company’s physician staffing segment and nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment, respectively. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

intangible assets acquired, and is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill will not be amortized and will be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company’s total goodwill at December 31, 2005 was $240.8 million, including the MHA earn-out liability.

The following summary presents pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 as if the MHA acquisition described above had occurred on January 1, 2005 and 2004. The following unaudited pro forma financial information gives effect to certain adjustments, including the reduction in compensation expense related to non-recurring executive salary expense and non-recurring professional service fees, the amortization of intangible assets and interest expense on acquisition related debt and accretion of fair valued liabilities. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated as of the date indicated, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.

   (Unaudited)
   Year ended December 31,

   2005

  2004

   (in thousands, except per
share amounts)

Revenue

  $959,821  $862,311
   

  

Income from operations

  $64,018  $46,266
   

  

Net income

  $28,880  $18,024
   

  

Net income per common share:

        

Basic

  $0.91  $0.58
   

  

Diluted

  $0.83  $0.52
   

  

Weighted average common shares:

        

Basic

   31,733   31,226
   

  

Diluted

   34,789   34,416
   

  

OGP Europe Acquisition

On April 19, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of O’Grady-Peyton International (Europe) Limited (OGP Europe) for a total purchase price of $0.5 million, including $0.1 million net liabilities assumed, which resulted in the recording of $0.5 million of goodwill and $0.1 million of identified intangible assets. The acquisition was recorded using the purchase method of accounting. Thus, the results of operations of OGP Europe are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date.

(3) Tender Offer

 

On October 16, 2003, the Company completed a tender offer for $180,000,000, or 9,722,222 shares of its outstanding common stock and 376,029 employee stock options at a price of $18.00 per share. In connection with the tender offer, the Company amended its then current credit facility. The tender offer was financed with a $130,000,000 term loan under the Company’s amended credit facility, $15,000,000 of borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and $35,000,000 of cash on hand. The Company also paid $110,000 and $4,433,000 in transaction costs in 2004 and 2003, respectively, associated with the tender offer and the amendment of the credit facility, which were funded with cash on hand. See Notes 7 and 9(a).

(3) Acquisitions

On April 23, 2002, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of HRMC, a nationwide provider of travel healthcare staffing, in order to increase the Company’s presence in the Southeast.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

The acquisition was recorded using the purchase method of accounting. Thus, the results of operations from HRMC are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date. The purchase price included a payment of $8,561,000 in cash (net of $199,000 cash received), and $400,000 which was delivered to an escrow agent on the acquisition date. The funds held in escrow were released to the former shareholders on April 23, 2003.

The Company acquired HRMC’s assets of $2,070,000 (net of cash received), assumed its liabilities of $524,000 and recorded goodwill in the amount of $7,379,000, which is tax deductible in its entirety. The Company allocated $200,000 of the purchase price to the noncompete agreement, which is being amortized over the four-year life of the agreement. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the unamortized cost of this covenant was $65,000 and $116,000, respectively.

The following summary presents pro forma consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 as if the HRMC acquisition described above had occurred on January 1, 2002. The following unaudited pro forma financial information gives effect to certain adjustments, including the amortization of intangible assets and interest expense on acquisition debt and depreciation on fixed assets. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated as of the date indicated, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.

   

(Unaudited)

Year Ended
December 31,

2002


   

(in thousands, except

per share amounts)

Revenue

  $780,414

Income from operations

  $86,642

Net income

  $52,586
   

Net income per common share:

    

Basic

  $1.24
   

Diluted

  $1.12
   

Weighted average shares:

    

Basic

   42,534
   

Diluted

   46,805
   

(4) Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets

 

As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company had the following acquired intangible assets with definite lives (in thousands):

 

   December 31, 2004

  December 31, 2003

 
   Gross
Carrying
Amount


  Accumulated
Amortization


  Gross
Carrying
Amount


  Accumulated
Amortization


 

Noncompete agreements

  $400  $(318) $1,544  $(1,214)

Deferred financing costs

   5,619   (2,201)  5,361   (752)
   

  


 

  


Total

  $6,019  $(2,519) $6,905  $(1,966)
   

  


 

  


AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

   December 31, 2005

  December 31, 2004

 
   Gross
Carrying
Amount


  Accumulated
Amortization


  Gross
Carrying
Amount


  Accumulated
Amortization


 

Intangible assets subject to amortization:

                 

Staffing databases

  $1,600  $(52) $—    $—   

Customer relationships

   32,000   (368)  —     —   

Tradenames and trademarks

   1,200   (39)  —     —   

Noncompete agreements

   1,150   (222) $400  $(318)

Deferred financing costs

   7,576   (1,593)  5,619   (2,201)
   

  


 

  


   $43,526  $(2,274) $6,019  $(2,519)
   

  


 

  


Intangible assets not subject to amortization:

                 

Goodwill (1)

  $251,296  $(10,452) $145,901  $(10,452)

Tradenames and trademarks

   79,900   —     —     —   
   

  


 

  


   $331,196  $(10,452) $145,901  $(10,452)
   

  


 

  


 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)(1) Goodwill accumulated amortization represents amortization expense recorded prior to the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002.

 

During 2004, the Company wrote off $1,144,000 of fully amortized intangible assets related to the expired noncompete agreements, and incurred credit facility amendment fees of $258,000 which were capitalized as deferred financing costs.

 

Aggregate amortization expense for the intangible assets presented in the above table was $1,697,000$2,902,000 and $886,000$1,697,000 for the years ended December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Amortization of deferred financing costs is included in interest expense. Estimated future aggregateBased on the current amount of intangibles subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense of intangible assets as of December 31, 20042005 is as follows (in thousands):

 

  Amount

  Amount

Year ending December 31, 2005

  $1,027

Year ending December 31, 2006

  $951  $4,168

Year ending December 31, 2007

  $910   4,153

Year ending December 31, 2008

  $612   4,153

Year ending December 31, 2009

   4,144

Year ending December 31, 2010

   3,936

Thereafter

   20,698
  

  $41,252
  

 

As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company had unamortized goodwill of $240,844,000 and $135,449,000, and $135,532,000, respectively. Goodwill decreased by $83,000Of the $105,395,000 increase in 2004 due to tax amortizationgoodwill, $104,883,000 was related to goodwill for which the tax basis exceedsacquisition of MHA in November 2005, and $512,000 was related to the book basis. As the amortization for the tax basis is recorded, a portion is allocated to goodwill based on the percentage for which the goodwill tax basis exceeds the book basis.acquisition of O’Grady-Peyton International (Europe) Limited in April 2005.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

(5) Balance Sheet Details

 

The consolidated balance sheets detail is as follows as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 (in thousands):

 

  December 31,

   December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Fixed assets, net:

   

Fixed assets:

   

Furniture and equipment

  $10,688  $11,883   $13,580  $10,688 

Software

   17,370   13,074    20,469   17,370 

Leasehold improvements

   4,527   4,313    4,942   4,527 
  


 


  


 


   32,585   29,270    38,991   32,585 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (14,752)  (10,856)   (18,827)  (14,752)
  


 


  


 


Fixed assets, net

  $17,833  $18,414   $20,164  $17,833 
  


 


Accounts payable and accrued expenses:

   

Trade and accrued accounts payable

  $3,242  $3,792 

Professional liability reserve

   6,954   3,887 

Other

   2,888   5,275 
  


 


Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  $13,084  $12,954 
  


 


  


 


Accrued compensation and benefits:

      

Accrued payroll

  $11,833  $14,860   $13,196  $11,833 

Accrued bonuses

   3,397   2,615    8,376   3,397 

Accrued health insurance reserve

   2,274   3,514    2,373   2,274 

Accrued workers compensation reserve

   8,058   7,602    3,240   2,683 

Other

   4,408   3,526    5,023   4,408 
  


 


  


 


Accrued compensation and benefits

  $29,970  $32,117   $32,208  $24,595 
  


 


  


 


Other current liabilities:

   

Acquisition earn-out liability

  $46,096  $—   

Acquisition purchase price holdback liability

   2,290   —   

Facility deposits

   6,789   —   

Other

   3,843   351 
  


 


Other current liabilities

  $59,018  $351 
  


 


Other long-term liabilities:

   

Acquisition purchase price holdback liability

  $11,356  $—   

Workers compensation reserve

   7,104   5,375 

Professional liability reserve

   12,008   4,775 

Other

   6,659   3,173 
  


 


Other long-term liabilities

  $37,127  $13,323 
  


 


AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

(6) Income Taxes

 

The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 consists of the following (in thousands):

 

  December 31,

  December 31,

  2004

 2003

  2002

  2005

 2004

 2003

Current income taxes:

         

Federal

  $5,596  $14,816  $23,320  $(6,535) $5,543  $14,816

State

   871   3,013   3,637   2,080   871   3,013

Foreign

   576   53   —  
  


 

  

  


 


 

Total

   6,467   17,829   26,957   (3,879)  6,467   17,829
  


 

  

  


 


 

Deferred income taxes:

         

Federal

   4,141   5,591   5,519   18,245   4,171   5,591

State

   (55)  449   1,776   604   (55)  449

Foreign

   (39)  (30)  —  
  


 

  

  


 


 

Total

   4,086   6,040   7,295   18,810   4,086   6,040
  


 

  

  


 


 

Provision for income taxes

  $10,553  $23,869  $34,252  $14,931  $10,553  $23,869
  


 

  

  


 


 

 

The Company’s income tax expense differs from the amount that would have resulted from applying the federal statutory rate of 35% to pretax income because of the effect of the following items during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 (in thousands):

 

  December 31,

  December 31,

  2004

 2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

 2003

Tax expense at federal statutory rate

  $9,765  $21,582  $30,313  $13,008  $9,765  $21,582

State taxes, net of federal benefit

   974   2,132   3,518   1,659   974   2,132

Other, net

   (186)  155   421   264   (186)  155
  


 

  

  

  


 

Income tax expense

  $10,553  $23,869  $34,252  $14,931  $10,553  $23,869
  


 

  

  

  


 

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 (in thousands):

 

  December 31,

   December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Deferred tax assets:

      

Stock compensation

  $17,480  $16,893   $15,535  $17,480 

State taxes

   —     863 

Deferred revenue

   4,559   —   

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   205   1,263    954   205 

Deferred compensation

   414   44    606   414 

Accrued expenses, net

   4,772   —      6,288   4,772 

Deferred rent

   1,123   —   

Net operating losses

   7,276   —   

State taxes

   358   —   

Other

   10   117    464   10 
  


 


  


 


Total deferred tax assets

  $22,881  $19,180   $37,163  $22,881 
  


 


  


 


Deferred tax liabilities:

      

Intangibles

  $(13,284) $(9,021)  $(63,587) $(13,284)

Fixed assets, net

   (4,112)  (2,826)   (4,481)  (4,112)

Prepaid expenses

   (3,715)  —      (2,820)  (3,715)

Accrued expenses, net

   —     (1,262)

State taxes

   (52)  —      —     (52)
  


 


  


 


Total deferred tax liabilities

  $(21,163) $(13,109)  $(70,888) $(21,163)
  


 


  


 


Valuation allowance

  $(102)  —   
  


 


Net deferred tax assets

  $1,718  $6,071   $(33,827) $1,718 
  


 


  


 


AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

Management believes it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets, excluding state net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards, and, accordingly, has not provided a valuation allowance.allowance for these assets except for the items mentioned below.

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $14,248,000 and $41,428,000, respectively, that are set to expire at various dates between 2009 and 2025. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize $562,000 of these state losses prior to the expiration of these state net operating loss carryforwards, and therefore the Company has established a valuation allowance of $28,000 for these state net operating loss carryforwards.

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $74,000 that are set to expire in 2014. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient foreign source income to utilize these foreign tax credit carryforwards, and therefore the Company has established a valuation allowance of $74,000 for these foreign tax credit carryforwards.

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has California research and development credit carryforwards of $16,000 that generally do not expire. Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize these California research and development credit carryforwards, and therefore the Company has not provided a valuation allowance for these assets.

As of December 31, 2005, pursuant to APB No. 23, “Accounting for Income Taxes – Special Areas”, the Company did not provide for United States income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings from certain non-U.S. subsidiaries that will be permanently reinvested outside the United States. The Company intends to reinvest its foreign earnings indefinitely under APB-23. Should the Company repatriate foreign earnings, the Company would have to adjust the income tax provision in the period management determined that the Company would repatriate earnings.

 

(7) Notes Payable and Related Derivative Instruments and Credit Agreement

 

In January 2003, the Company amended its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement)(“Credit Agreement”) by increasing the funds available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility from $50 million to $75 million and extending the maturity date from November 16, 2004 to December 31, 2006. The Credit Agreement also included up to $10 million of borrowings under letter of credit obligations and up to $10 million of borrowings under swing-line loans, both sub-facilities of the revolving credit facility, which remained unchanged in this amendment.

 

In October 2003, the Company amended the Credit Agreement to provide for a new $130 million term loan, increase funds available under the letter of credit sub-facility to $15 million and extend the maturity date through October 2, 2008.

 

In July 2004, the Company amended the Credit Agreement to provide for increased flexibility under its financial covenants, increase funds available under the letter of credit sub-facility to $30 million and add a 25 basis point increase in the interest rate margin in the event of a downgrade in the Company’s credit rating. Since the amendment date, the Company has not had a downgrade in its credit rating. Additionally, as a result of the amendment, the Company incurred amendment fees of $258,000. These costs were deferred and are being amortized using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the credit facility.

 

The

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

In November 2005, in connection with the acquisition of MHA, the Company amended and restated its existing credit facility. Our new credit facility, the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“New Credit Agreement”), provides for, among other things, a $75 million secured revolving credit facility, a $30 million letter of credit sub-facility, a $15 million swing-line sub-facility, all maturing in November 2010, and a new $205 million secured term loan originatingfacility maturing in October 2003 was originally due in eighteen consecutive quarterly installments beginning with a principal payment of $1,500,000 on June 30, 2004, with payments escalating to $53,000,000 on June 30, 2008, and maturing on September 30, 2008.November 2011. The Company paid the initial mandatory principal installment of $1,500,000 on June 30, 2004, and the second and third mandatory principal installments of $1,284,000 and $1,243,000 on September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The mandatory installments were reduced after the initial installment due to the $24,250,000 of voluntary prepayments made during the second half of 2004. Voluntary prepayments of thenew secured term loan are applied ratablyfacility was used to pay off existing borrowings of $87.8 million of term debt and provide financing for the remaining quarterly amortization payments.acquisition. In addition,connection with the pay off, the Company wrote off $0.5$1.2 million of deferred financing costs, which is includedrecorded in interest expense, during the year ended December 31, 2004 related to these voluntary prepayments.expense.

 

The term loan bears interest, due quarterly and paid in arrears, at LIBOR plus 3.0% or the higher of the federal funds rate plus 2.5% and the prime lending rate plus 2.0%, as selected by the Company. The revolving credit facility provides for loans bearing interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus 1.75% to 3.25% or the higherportion of the federal funds rate plus 1.25% to 2.75% and the prime lending rate plus 0.75% to 2.25%, as selected by the Company and considering the Company’s leverage ratio. The revolving credit facilityNew Credit Agreement carries an unused fee of between 0.5% and 0.375% per annum based on our current leverage ratio, and there are no mandatory reductions in the revolving commitment. The swing-line loanscommitment under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility bear interest dueat floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a prime interest rate option selected by us, plus a spread of 1.50% to 2.25% and 0.50% to 1.25%, respectively, to be determined based on our current leverage ratio. Amounts available under the Company’s revolving credit facility may be used for working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and general corporate purposes, subject to various limitations.

The six year, $205 million term loan portion of our New Credit Agreement is subject to quarterly at the higheramortization of principal, with an amount equal to 1.25% of the federal fundsinitial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly through September 30, 2007 (except in the case of the initial quarterly payment on June 30, 2006 of 2.5%) and 2.5% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the facility payable quarterly from December 31, 2007 through September 30, 2010 with any remaining amounts payable in 2011. These quarterly payments begin on June 30, 2006 with an initial payment of $5.1 million. Voluntary prepayments of the term loan portion of the credit facility are applied as we may elect, including ratably to the remaining quarterly amortization payments. Borrowings under this term loan facility bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a prime interest rate option selected by us, plus 0.5%a spread of 1.75% or 2.00% and the prime lending rate.0.75% or 1.00%, respectively, to be determined based on our current leverage ratio.

 

In October 2003, and September 2004 and October 2005, the Company established standby letters of credit of $3,683,000$3.7 million, $2.9 million and $2,874,000,$2.4 million, respectively, as collateral in relation to its workers compensation insurance agreement. In September 2004 and December 2004, the Company established standby letters of credit of $125,000$0.1 million and $500,000,$0.5 million, respectively, as collateral in relation to its professional liability insurance agreement. Each of these letters of credit bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.75%1.50% to 3.25%2.25% based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Total outstanding standby letters of credit at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $9.6 million and 2003 was $7,182,000 and $3,683,000,$7.2 million, respectively.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

Notes payable balances as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,

   December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

$75,000,000 Revolver due October 2, 2008 with variable interest rates. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2003 was 4.4%.

  $—    $8,900 

$130,000,000 Term Loan due September 30, 2008 with variable interest rates. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was 5.2% and 5.0%, respectively

   101,723   130,000 
  


 


Total notes payable

   101,723   138,900 

Less current portion of notes payable, including revolver

   (4,863)  (13,400)

$205,000,000 Term Loan due September 30, 2011 with variable interest rates. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was 6.4% and 5.2%, respectively

  $205,000  $101,723 

Less current portion of notes payable

   (10,250)  (4,863)
  


 


  


 


Long-term portion of notes payable

  $96,860  $125,500   $194,750  $96,860 
  


 


  


 


Annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

      

2005

  $4,863  

2006

   4,863    $10,250  

2007

   4,863     12,813  

2008

   87,134     20,500  

2009

   20,500  

2010

   46,125  

2011

   94,812  
  


   


 
  $101,723    $205,000  
  


   


 

 

The Company is required to make additional mandatory prepayments on the term loan with the proceeds of asset dispositions, extraordinary receipts, debt issuances and certain equity issuances. The Company is also required to make mandatory prepayments on the term loan within ninety days after the end of each fiscal year, commencing with the fiscal year endingended December 31, 2004. The prepayment is2006 in an amount equal to 50% of the Company’sour excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Agreement), less any voluntary prepayments made during the fiscal year. TheThese mandatory prepayment amount,amounts, if any, isare applied ratably to the remaining quarterly amortization payments. Voluntary prepayments made during 2004 have satisfied this additional prepayment requirement for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

The Company’s outstanding debt instruments at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 were secured by all assets of the Company and the common stock of its subsidiaries. The Company’s New Credit Agreement contains various financial ratio covenants, including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio, as well as restrictions on assumption of additional indebtedness, declaration of dividends, dispositions of assets, consolidation into another entity, capital expenditures in excess of specified amounts and allowable investments. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and ratios at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

 

In October 2003, theThe Company entered intois required to maintain interest rate swap agreements as a means to hedge its interest rate exposureprotection on variable rate debt instruments. The Credit Agreement requires that the Company maintain protection against fluctuations in interest rates providing coverage for at least 50% of the term loan portion of the credit facility through January 1, 2006. At December 31,its New Credit Agreement beginning May 2006 until November 2008. In October 2003, the Company had threeentered into an interest rate swapsswap agreement to minimize exposure to interest rate fluctuations on $30 million of its outstanding with a major financial institution that effectively converted variable-ratevariable rate debt to fixed rate. The swaps had notional amounts of $30,000,000, $50,000,000 and $30,000,000,under the existing credit facility whereby the Company pays a fixed ratesrate of 1.42%2.65% and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. This agreement expires in September 2006, and no initial investment was made to enter into this agreement. In June 2005, the Company entered into two additional interest rate swap agreements. The first agreement has a notional amount of $20 million and became effective in September 2005, whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 3.99% and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. The agreement expires in March 2007. The second agreement will become effective in September 2006, with a notional amount of $15 million whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 4.09% and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. This agreement will expire in September 2007. In November 2005, the Company entered into five additional interest rate swap agreements for notional amounts of $15 million, $10 million, $30 million, $35 million and $50 million, whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 4.82%, 2.06%4.95%, 4.87%, 4.94%, and 2.65%4.97%, respectively, and receives a floating three-month LIBOR. The first agreement expired in September 2004, and the remaining twoThese agreements expire in September 2005 and September 2006, respectively, and no initial investments were made to enter into these agreements. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the interest rate swap agreements had a fair value of $650,000 and ($198,000), respectively, which is included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.2007, June 2008, December

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

2008, December 2009 and December 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the interest rate swap agreements had a fair value of ($0.1) million and $0.7 million, respectively, which is included in other assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company has formally documented the hedging relationships and accounts for these arrangements as cash flow hedges.

 

(8) Retirement Plans

 

The Company maintains the Healthcare Staffing Retirement Savings Plan (the AMN Plan), a profit sharing plan that complies with the Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC) 401(k) provisions. The AMN Plan covers all employees that meet certain age and other eligibility requirements. An annual discretionary matching contribution is determined by the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee of the Board of Directors each year and may be up to a maximum 6% of eligible compensation paid to all participants during the plan year. The amount of the employer contributions were $2,341,000, $2,204,000, $2,982,000 and $2,683,000$2,982,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. In 2004,2005, the Company applied $1,600,000$951,000 of outstanding 401(k) forfeiture balances under the AMN Plan against current employer match contributions of $2,204,000,$2,341,000, thereby reducing the Company’s recognized contributions for the year.

OGP and HRMC maintained separate salary deferral plans. Both plans complied with the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) provisions and covered substantially all employees that met certain age and service requirements. No matches were provided under the OGP plan. Effective January 1, 2002, OGP employees were eligible to participate in the AMN Plan and the OGP plan was terminated. Under the HRMC plan, the Company matched 25% of the employee contributions up to a maximum 6% of eligible compensation paid to all participants during the plan year. Effective January 1, 2003, HRMC employees were eligible to participate in the AMN Plan and the HRMC plan was terminated.

 

In January 2002, the Company established the Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan of AMN Healthcare, Inc. (theThe Executive Plan), aNonqualified Excess Plan is not intended to be tax qualified and is an unfunded plan. This plan is primarily composed of deferred compensation and all related income and losses attributable thereto. Discretionary matching contributions to the plan are made that replacesvest incrementally so that the AMN Plan for certain executives and which compliesemployee is fully vested in the match following five years of employment with the IRC 401(k) provisions.Company. The Company established the 2005 Amended and Restated Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan covers employees that meet certaineffective January 1, 2005, to comply with newly enacted legislation. The Company amended the 2005 Amended and Restated Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan effective November 1, 2005. The 2005 Amended and Restated Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan provides discretion to the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee in determining an employee’s eligibility requirements.for participation in the plan and increased plan participation eligibility to include additional key employees. Eligible compensation was increased to 80% of an employee’s base salary and 100% of an employee’s bonus. Investment options are determined based on an underlying private placement insurance contract. An annual discretionary matching contribution is determined by the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee of the Board of Directors each year. The amount of the employer contributions was $69,000, $65,000 $54,000 and $61,000$54,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

(9) Stockholders’ Equity

 

(a) Stock Option Plans

 

In July 2001, the 2001 Stock Option Plan was established to provide a means to attract and retain employees. In May 2004, the 2001 Stock Option Plan was renamed the Stock Option Plan, and an additional 2,000,000 options were authorized for issuance to increase the maximum number of options to be granted under the plan to 4,178,000. Subject to certain conditions, unless the plan is otherwise modified, a maximum of 544,500 options may be granted to any one person in any calendar year. Exercise prices will be determined at the time of grant and will be no less than fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Unless otherwise provided at the time of the grant, the options shall vest and become exercisable in increments of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The plan expires on the tenth anniversary of the effective date. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, 356,001 and 2003, respectively, 1,282,126 and 113,481 shares of common stock were reserved for future grants related to the Stock Option Plan.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

In November 1999, the Company established two performance stock option plans (the 1999 Plans) to provide for the grant of options to the Company’s upper management. Options for a maximum of 4,040,000 shares of common stock were authorized at an exercise price of $3.80 per option for grants within 120 days of the 1999 Recapitalization and not less than the fair market value in the case of subsequent grants. During 2000, options for an additional 1,493,000 shares were reserved under the 1999 Plans. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, 351,274 shares of common stock were reserved for future grants related to the 1999 Plans. Options under the plan1999 Plans began vesting at 25% per year beginning in the year 2000 provided certain earnings performance criteria were met and the grantee remained an employee. If the Company did not meet the performance criteria for a particular year, the portion of the option which was eligible to become vested terminated. Vested options expire

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

nine to ten years from the grant date. During 2000, options for an additional 1,493,000 shares were reserved under the 1999 Plans. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, 351,274 shares of common stock were reserved for future grants related to the 1999 Plans. Pursuant to the amended provisions of the 1999 Plans, all options previously granted under the 1999 Plans became fully vested upon the November 2001 common stock offering and remain exercisable over a four-year term.at December 31, 2005 are fully exercisable. All previously granted options under the 1999 Plans expire in 2009.

 

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its 1999 Plans and the Stock Option Plan. Accordingly, because the 1999 Plans were performance-based and certain grants under the Stock Option Plan were granted at less than fair market value, the Company recorded compensation expense of $142,000 in 2005, $750,000 in 2004 and $874,000 in 2003 and 2002.2003. Additionally, in 2003, the Company recorded compensation expense of $1,128,000 associated with the settlement of options in the tender offer, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See Note 2.3.

 

A summary of stock option activity under the 1999 Plans and the Stock Option Plan are as follows:

 

  1999 Plans

  Stock Option Plan

  1999 Plans

  Stock Option Plan

  

Options

Outstanding


 

Weighted-
Average

Exercise Price


  

Options

Outstanding


 

Weighted-
Average

Exercise Price


Outstanding at December 31, 2001

  5,182,000   4.55  633,000   9.46

Granted

  —     —    669,000   22.86

Exercised

  (604,000)  3.80  (98,000)  9.09
  

 

  

 

  

Options

Outstanding


 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price


  

Options

Outstanding


 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price


Outstanding at December 31, 2002

  4,578,000   4.65  1,204,000   16.93  4,578,000  $4.65  1,204,000  $16.93

Granted

  —     —    777,000   9.68  —     —    777,000   9.68

Exercised (1)

  (316,000)  3.80  (66,000)  9.38  (316,000)  3.80  (66,000)  9.38

Canceled

  —     —    (14,000)  22.62  —     —    (14,000)  22.62
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2003

  4,262,000  $4.71  1,901,000  $14.19  4,262,000  $4.71  1,901,000  $14.19

Granted

  —     —    1,079,000   14.56  —     —    1,079,000   14.56

Exercised

  —     —    (224,000)  9.13  —     —    (224,000)  9.13

Canceled

  —     —    (248,000)  12.62  —     —    (248,000)  12.62
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2004

  4,262,000  $4.71  2,508,000  $14.96  4,262,000  $4.71  2,508,000  $14.96

Granted

  —     —    987,000   14.95

Exercised

  (440,000)  4.52  (86,000)  10.14

Canceled

  —     —    (60,000)  16.19
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2004

  4,262,000  $4.71  571,000  $16.72

Outstanding at December 31, 2005

  3,822,000  $4.73  3,349,000  $15.06
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2005

  3,822,000  $4.73  1,100,000  $16.10
  

 

  

 

 

(1) Includes 376,000 options at a weighted average exercise price of $4.70 purchased in connection with the self-tender offer in October 2003.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

The following table summarizes options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2004:2005:

 

 Options Outstanding

 Options Exercisable

 Options Outstanding

 Options Exercisable

 

Range

Of

Exercise

Price


 

Number

Outstanding


 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (Years)


 

Weighted-
Average

Exercise

Price


 

Number

Outstanding


 

Weighted-
Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (Years)


 

Weighted-
Average

Exercise

Price


 

Range

Of

Exercise

Price


 

Number

Outstanding


 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (Years)


 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price


 

Number

Outstanding


 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (Years)


 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price


1999 Plans

 $  3.80 2,918,000 5 $  3.80 2,918,000 5 $  3.80 $  3.80 2,588,000 4 $  3.80 2,588,000 4 $  3.80
    6.68 1,344,000 5 6.68 1,344,000 5 6.68     6.68 1,234,000 5 6.68 1,234,000 5 6.68
 
 
  
 
 
 4,262,000 4,262,000  3,822,000 3,822,000 
 
 
  
 
 

Stock Option Plan

 $  6.89 - $  9.19 54,000 7 $  9.09 38,000 7 $  9.09 $  6.89 - $  9.19 34,000 6 $  9.09 34,000 6 $  9.09
   9.20 -   11.49 701,000 8 9.68 178,000 8 9.68 9.20 -   11.49 628,000 7 9.68 300,000 7 9.68
 11.50 -   13.79 229,000 9 12.08 58,000 7 11.92 11.50 -   13.79 210,000 8 12.10 97,000 7 12.02
 13.80 -   16.08 927,000 9 14.94 —   —   —   13.80 -   16.08 1,908,000 9 14.94 245,000 8 14.94
 16.09 -   18.38 3,000 10 16.32 —   —   —   16.09 -   18.38 3,000 9 16.32 1,000 9 16.32
 20.69 -   22.98 594,000 7 22.85 297,000 7 22.85 20.69 -   22.98 566,000 6 22.85 423,000 6 22.85
 
 
  
 
 
 2,508,000 571,000  3,349,000 1,100,000 
 
 
  
 
 

 

(b) Stock Repurchase Program

 

In November 2002, the Company’s board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing a repurchase of up to $100 million of the Company’s common stock on the open market at prevailing market prices from time to time through December 2003. Stock repurchases are subject to prevailing market conditions and other considerations, including limitations under applicable securities laws. Under the terms of the program, the Company repurchased 5,154,200 shares at an average purchase price of $14.29 per share, or an aggregate of $73.7 million. As of December 31, 2004,2005, there were no authorized stock repurchase programs.

 

(10) Related Party Transactions

 

(a) Majority stockholder

 

During 2004 and 2003, the Company paid an affiliate of the controlling stockholders $10,000 and $30,000, respectively, for out of pocket expenses related to meetings of the Board of Directors, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In

The Company completed secondary offerings of its common stock for 2,300,000 and 10,631,303 shares on April 2002,18, 2005 and May 27, 2005, respectively. All of the Company paid this affiliate $139,000 for advisory services related to12,931,303 shares were sold by affiliates of Haas Wheat & Partners, L.P., a private equity investment firm whose affiliates had owned shares of the acquisitioncompany since 1999. Robert B. Haas, who exercised sole voting and dispositive power over the 12,931,303 shares by virtue of HRMC, which is included in transaction costs forhis control over Haas Wheat & Partners, L.P. and its affiliates, served as the year ended December 31, 2002 inChairman of the accompanying consolidated statementsCompany’s Board of operations.Directors until May 4, 2005. The Company’s Presiding Director, Douglas D. Wheat, serves as President of Haas Wheat & Partners, L.P.

 

(b) Minority stockholders

 

The CompanyDuring 2005, a family member of MHA received services from an advertising agency that was 30% owned by a minority stockholder during 2002. The minority stockholder sold its interestnon-interest bearing loan of $55,000 prior to the acquisition date, of which $16,000 is included in other current assets in the advertising agency during March 2002. The Company incurred expenses of $15,000 from January 1, 2002 throughaccompanying consolidated balance sheet for the date of the sale in March 2002 related to these services.year ended December 31, 2005.

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

(11) Commitments and Contingencies

 

(a) Legal

 

The Company is subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. Some of these matters include payroll and employee-related matters and investigations by governmental agencies regarding employment practices. As the Company becomes aware of such claims and legal actions, the Company provides accruals if the exposures are probable and estimable. If an adverse outcome of such claims and legal actions is reasonably possible, the Company assesses materiality and provides disclosure, as appropriate. The Company may also become subject to claims, governmental inquiries and investigations and legal actions relating to services provided by the Company’s temporary healthcare professionals, and maintainsmaintain accruals for these matters if the amounts are probable and estimable. The Company is currently not aware of any such pending or threatened litigation that would be considered reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

(b) Leases

 

The Company leases certain office facilities and equipment under various operating and capital leases over the next five years and thereafter. Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) and future minimum capital lease payments as of December 31, 20042005 are as follows (in thousands):

 

  Capital
Leases


 Operating
Leases


  Capital
Leases


 

Operating

Leases


Years ending December 31:

      

2005

  $376  $8,401

2006

   376   8,719  $494  $16,327

2007

   150   9,013   493   17,820

2008

   13   8,657   479   17,417

2009

   —     8,653   464   17,389

2010

   158   17,149

Thereafter

   —     49,704   —     85,102
  


 

  


 

Total minimum lease payments

  $915  $93,147  $2,088  $171,204
   

   

Less amount representing interest (at rates ranging from 4.83% to 9.19%)

   (58) 

Less amount representing interest (at rates ranging from 3.20% to 12.75%)

   (190) 
  


   


 

Present value of minimum lease payments

   857     1,898  

Less current installments of obligations under capital leases

   (345)    (417) 
  


   


 

Obligations under capital leases, excluding current installments

  $512    $1,481  
  


   


 

 

Fixed assets obtained through capital leases as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 are as follows (in thousands):

 

  December 31,

   December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Fixed assets

  $1,634  $1,639   $2,203  $1,634 

Accumulated amortization

   (820)  (508)   (400)  (820)
  


 


  


 


Fixed assets, net

  $814  $1,131   $1,803  $814 
  


 


  


 


AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 

Obligations under capital leases are included in other current and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. Rent expense was $11,839,000, $10,682,000, $8,295,000 and $7,090,000$8,295,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

(12) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

  Year Ended December 31, 2004

  Year Ended December 31, 2005

  

First

Quarter


  

Second

Quarter


  

Third

Quarter


  

Fourth

Quarter


  Total Year

  First
Quarter


  

Second

Quarter


  

Third

Quarter


  Fourth
Quarter


  Total Year

  (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data)

Revenue

  $161,265  $153,368  $156,083  $158,300  $629,016  $156,842  $160,689  $166,883  $221,429  $705,843

Gross profit

  $35,829  $34,982  $36,700  $36,851  $144,362  $35,717  $37,168  $39,544  $57,806  $170,235

Net income

  $4,559  $4,323  $3,930  $4,534  $17,346  $3,993  $4,416  $6,848  $6,977  $22,234

Net income per share:

                              

Basic

  $0.16  $0.15  $0.14  $0.16  $0.61  $0.14  $0.15  $0.24  $0.23  $0.76

Diluted

  $0.15  $0.14  $0.13  $0.14  $0.55  $0.13  $0.14  $0.22  $0.21  $0.69

 

   Year Ended December 31, 2003

   

First

Quarter


  

Second

Quarter


  

Third

Quarter


  

Fourth

Quarter(a)


  Total Year

   (In thousands, except per share data)

Revenue

  $199,765  $183,364  $171,463  $159,617  $714,209

Gross profit

  $44,751  $41,991  $39,025  $36,390  $162,157

Net income

  $12,399  $11,190  $9,286  $4,917  $37,792

Net income per share:

                    

Basic

  $0.31  $0.29  $0.25  $0.16  $1.04

Diluted

  $0.29  $0.27  $0.22  $0.15  $0.95

(a) The fourth quarter of 2003 was impacted by $1.2 million of stock-based compensation (including related payroll taxes) and $1.9 million of interest expense associated with the Company’s tender offer. See Note 2.

   Year Ended December 31, 2004

   First
Quarter


  

Second

Quarter


  

Third

Quarter


  Fourth
Quarter(a)


  Total Year

   (In thousands, except per share data)

Revenue

  $161,265  $153,368  $156,083  $158,300  $629,016

Gross profit

  $35,829  $34,982  $36,700  $36,851  $144,362

Net income

  $4,559  $4,323  $3,930  $4,534  $17,346

Net income per share:

                    

Basic

  $0.16  $0.15  $0.14  $0.16  $0.61

Diluted

  $0.15  $0.14  $0.13  $0.14  $0.55

Item 9.    Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

 

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness(1) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20042005 were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

 

(2) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Management’s Annual ReportOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting isControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.

We acquired The MHA Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “acquired entity”) during 2005. Management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, the acquired entity’s internal control over financing reporting associated with total consolidated assets of $72.5 million and total revenue of $53.3 million included in Item 8, Financial Statementsthe consolidated financial statements of the Company and Supplementary Data, immediately precedingour subsidiaries as of and for the reportsyear ended December 31, 2005.

Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

 

(3) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20042005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

(4) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A.(2)), that AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

The Company acquired The MHA Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “acquired entity”) during 2005, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, the acquired entity’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $73.5 million and total revenues of $53.3 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our audit of internal control over financial

reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the acquired entity.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 9, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Diego, California

March 9, 2006

 

Item 9B.    Other Information

 

Robert Haas, our Non-Executive Chairman and Director since November 1999, has announced that he will step down from his position as Chairman effective May 4, 2005, in conjunction with the annual shareholders’ meeting. He will continue to serve as a Director and Chairman of the Executive Committee. Steven Francis, co-founder of the Company, Director and current Chief Executive Officer, will assume the role of Executive Chairman and will be actively engaged in the strategic development and operational oversight of the Company. Susan Nowakowski, currently President, Chief Operating Officer and Director, will become Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Nowakowski has been with AMN Healthcare for over 15 years and prior to her appointment as President in 2003, also held positions as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.None.

PART III

 

Item 10.    Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Information required by this item, other than the following information concerning our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the headings “Nominees for the Board of Directors” and “Non-Director Executive Officers” to be distributed in connection with our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders to be held on May 4, 2005.April 12, 2006.

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or any person performing similar functions, which is posted on our website at www.amnhealthcare.com/investors. We intend to publish any amendment to, or waiver from, the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers on our website.

 

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

 

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Executive Compensation and Related Information” to be distributed in connection with our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders to be held on May 4, 2005.April 12, 2006.

 

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder

                  Matters

 

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” to be distributed in connection with our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders to be held on May 4, 2005.April 12, 2006.

 

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” to be distributed in connection with our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders to be held on May 4, 2005.April 12, 2006.

 

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” to be distributed in connection with our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders to be held on May 4, 2005.April 12, 2006.

PART IV

 

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a) Documents filed as part of the report.

 

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements

ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(3) Exhibits

 

Exhibit

Number


  

Description


2.1

Acquisition Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2005, by and among AMN Healthcare Services, Inc., Cowboy Acquisition Corp., The MHA Group, Inc. and James C. Merritt and Joseph E. Hawkins (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2005).

2.2

Amendment No. 1 to Acquisition Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2005, by and among AMN Healthcare Services, Inc., Cowboy Acquisition Corp., The MHA Group, Inc. and James C. Merritt and Joseph E. Hawkins (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

2.3

Amendment No. 2 to Acquisition Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2005, by and among AMN Healthcare Services, Inc., Cowboy Acquisition Corp., The MHA Group, Inc. and James C. Merritt and Joseph E. Hawkins (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

3.1  

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.***

3.23.3  

Second Amended and Restated By-laws of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.** (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

4.1  

Specimen Stock Certificate.***

4.2  

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, among the Registrant, HWH Capital Partners, L.P., HWH Nightingale Partners, L.P., HWP Nightingale Partners II, L.P., HWP Capital Partners II, L.P., BancAmerica Capital Investors SBIC I, L.P., the Francis Family Trust dated May 24, 1996 and Steven Francis.***

10.14.3  

Stock PurchaseAmendment No. 1 to the Registration Rights Agreement dated as ofNovember 16, 2001, dated April 3, 2001,18, 2005 (incorporated by and between AMN Healthcare, Inc., Joseph O’Grady and Teresa O’Grady-Peyton.**reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 22, 2005).

10.24.4  

Amended and Restated CreditRegistration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001,2, 2005, among AMN Healthcare Services, Inc., Steven Francis, the Francis Family Trust dated May 24, 1996, James C. Merritt and Joseph E. Hawkins (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

4.5

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Bank of America, N.A., AMN Healthcare, Inc., as borrower, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc., Worldview Healthcare,AMN Services, Inc. and, O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto.***

10.3

First Amendment, dated as of April 8, 2002, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, by and among AMNInternational Healthcare Inc. as borrower, the Registrant, Worldview Healthcare,Recruiters, Inc. and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA)AMN Staffing Services, Inc., The MHA Group Inc., Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, Med Travelers, Inc., RN Demand, Inc., MHA Allied Consulting, Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto.****

10.4

Second Amendment, dated as of MayNovember 2, 2002, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, by and among AMN Healthcare, Inc. as borrower, the Registrant, Worldview Healthcare, Inc. and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto.****

10.5

Third Amendment, dated as of November 8, 2002, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, by and among AMN Healthcare, Inc. as borrower, the Registrant, Worldview Healthcare, Inc. and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto2005 (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s quarterly reportQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002).

10.6

Fourth Amendment, dated as of January 10, 2003, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, by and among AMN Healthcare, Inc. as borrower, the Registrant, Worldview Healthcare, Inc. and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002)2005).

10.7

Fifth Amendment, dated as of October 2, 2003, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, by and among AMN Healthcare, Inc. as borrower, the Registrant, Worldview Healthcare, Inc. and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to Schedule TO (Tender Offer Statement) filed with the Commission on October 2, 2003 (File No. 005-77951)).

10.810.1  

Office Lease, dated as of April 2, 2002, between Kilroy Realty, L.P. and AMN Healthcare, Inc.****

10.9

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2002, by and among AMN Healthcare, Inc., Sandra Gilbert, Robert Gilbert, Jr., Suzette Marek, Robert Gilbert III and Benjamin Gilbert.****

10.1010.2  

AMN Holdings, Inc. 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.1110.3  

AMN Holdings, Inc. 1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.1210.4  

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.13

Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, among AMN Holdings, Inc., AMN Acquisition Corp. and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.14

Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 25, 2003, to the Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, among AMN Holdings, Inc., AMN Acquisition Corp. and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.15

Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.16

Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2001, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Donald Myll. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.1710.5  

1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.1810.6  

Amendment, dated as of December 13, 2000, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.1910.7  

Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, as amended December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2010.8  

1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2110.9  

Amendment, dated as of December 13, 2000, to the Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2210.10  

Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, as amended December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2310.11  

1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2410.12  

Amendment, dated as of December 13, 2000, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2510.13  

Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, as amended December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2610.14  

1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2710.15  

Amendment, dated as of December 13, 2000, to the Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2810.16  

Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 19, 1999, as amended December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.2910.17  

1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3010.18  

Amendment, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3110.19  

1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3210.20  

Amendment, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3310.21  

1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Steven Francis.**

10.3410.22  

Amendment, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3510.23  

1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3610.24  

Amendment, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Steven Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3710.25  

1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3810.26  

Amendment, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.3910.27  

1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.4010.28  

Amendment, dated as of July 24, 2001, to the 1999 Super-Performance Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2000, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.4110.29  

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2001, between the Registrant and Donald Myll.**

10.4210.30  

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. 2001 Senior Management Bonus Plan. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)**

10.4310.31  

AMN Healthcare, Inc. Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.4410.32  

Amendment to AMN Healthcare, Inc. Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan, dated as of January 1, 2002 (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.4510.33  

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and Steven Francis (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.4610.34  

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and Susan Nowakowski (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.47

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and Donald Myll (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.48

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and Michael Gallagher (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.4910.35  

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and William Miller (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.5010.36  

2001 Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and Andrew Stern (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).****

10.51

Amended and Restated Financial Advisory Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, between the Registrant and Haas Wheat & Partners, L.P.***

10.5210.37  

Executive Severance Agreement between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and David C. Dreyer, dated September 20, 2004 (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement) (incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2004).

10.53

Sixth Amendment, dated as of July 21, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2001, by and among AMN Healthcare, Inc. as borrower, the Registrant, Worldview Healthcare, Inc. and O’Grady-Peyton International (USA), Inc., as guarantors, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).

10.5410.38  

Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on April 14, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-16753)).

10.5510.39  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004, between the Registrant and Andrew M. Stern (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.5610.40  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004, between the Registrant and William F. Miller III (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.5710.41  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004, between the Registrant and Kenneth F. Yontz (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.5810.42  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004, between the Registrant and Steven C. Francis (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.5910.43  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004, between the Registrant and Susan R. Nowakowski (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.6010.44  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004, between the Registrant and Denise L. Jackson (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.6110.45  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2004, between the Registrant and David C. Dreyer (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.6210.46  

Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2002, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Denise L. Jackson (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.6310.47  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2001, between the Registrant and Denise L. Jackson (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.6410.48  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2002, between the Registrant and Denise L. Jackson (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.6510.49  

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2003, between the Registrant and Denise L. Jackson (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement)*****

10.50

Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Steven C. Francis. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement) (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

10.51

Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Susan R. Nowakowski. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement) (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

10.52

Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Denise L. Jackson. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement) (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

10.53

Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and David C. Dreyer. (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement) (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

10.54

Form of Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement) (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005).

10.55

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2005, between the Registrant and Steven C. Francis (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

10.56

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2005, between the Registrant and Douglas D. Wheat (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

10.57

Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2005, between the Registrant and R. Jeffrey Harris (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

10.58

Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

10.59

The 2005 Amended and Restated Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan of AMN Healthcare, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).

10.60

Amendment, dated as of March 8, 2006, to the Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and Denise L. Jackson (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).*

10.61

Amendment, dated as of March 8, 2006, to the Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between AMN Healthcare, Inc. and David C. Dreyer (Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement).*

21.1  

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.*

23.1  

Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.*

31.1  

Certification by Steven C. FrancisSusan R. Nowakowski pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*

31.2  

Certification by David C. Dreyer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*

32.1  

Certification by Steven C. FrancisSusan R. Nowakowski pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

32.2  

Certification by David C. Dreyer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*


        *Filed herewith.

 

      **Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-65168).

 

    ***Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

 

**  ****Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-86952).

*****Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
  

/s/    STEVENUSAN C. FR. NRANCISOWAKOWSKI        


  

Steven C. FrancisSusan R. Nowakowski

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:March 11, 2005

Date: March 10, 2006

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated and on the 11th10th day of March, 2005.2006.

 

/s/    RSOBERTUSAN B. HR. NAASOWAKOWSKI        


Robert B. HaasSusan R. Nowakowski

Chairman of the BoardDirector, President and DirectorChief Executive Officer

/s/    STEVEN C. FRANCIS        


Steven C. Francis

Director and Chief Executive OfficerChairman of the Board

/s/    WILLIAM F. MILLER III        


William F. Miller III

Director

/s/    ANDREW M. STERN        


Andrew M. Stern

Director

/s/    DOUGLAS D. WHEAT        


Douglas D. Wheat

Director

/s/    KENNETH F. YONTZ        


Kenneth F. Yontz

Director

/s/    SR. JUSANEFFREY R. NHOWAKOWSKIARRIS        


Susan R. NowakowskiJeffrey Harris

Director President, and Chief Operating Officer

/s/    DAVID C. DREYER        


David C. Dreyer

Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Schedule II

 

AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

 

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


  Balance at
the Beginning
of Year


  Provision

 Deductions(*)

 Balance at
End of
Year


  

Balance at

the Beginning

of Year


  Provision

 Deductions(*)

 

Balance at

End of

Year


  (in thousands)  (in thousands)

Year ended December 31, 2002

  $3,242  $2,833  $(1,765) $4,310

Year ended December 31, 2003

  $4,310  $(315) $(653) $3,342  $4,310  $(315) $(653) $3,342

Year ended December 31, 2004

  $3,342  $173  $(1,763) $1,752  $3,342  $173  $(1,763) $1,752

Year ended December 31, 2005

  $1,752  $1,738  $(1,115) $2,375

(*)Accounts written off

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

7076