In Nevada, exploration efforts during 2005 added 2.2 million equity ounces to proven and probable reserves, offset by depletion of 34.02.9 million equity ounces, resulting in total proven and probable reserves in Nevada of 33.3 million equity ounces as of December 31, 2004, after depletion of 3.0 million equity ounces during 2004.

2005.

In Peru, equity gold reserves increased to 16.616.8 million ounces, after depletion of 2.02.4 million ounces and a reclassification of 2.0 million ounces to mineralized material not in reserves at Cerro Quilish.ounces. At Minas Conga, 4.51.6 million equity ounces of gold and 1.10.5 billion equity pounds of copper were added to proven and probable reserves. Minas Conga is a development project that currently consists of two gold-copper porphyry deposits located northeast of the Minera Yanacocha operating area in the provinces of Celendin, Cajamarca and Hualgayoc.

In Australia/New Zealand, the Company depleted 1.9replaced depletion of 1.7 million equity ounces during 2004.2005. Australia/New Zealand reported proven and probable reserves of 14.9 million equity ounces as of December 31, 2005.

At Batu Hijau, the Company depleted 0.4 billion equity pounds of copper and 0.5 million equity ounces of gold during 2005. Batu Hijau had proven and probable reserves of 15.1 million equity ounces at December 31, 2004.

At Batu Hijau, positive mine optimization efforts resulted in proven and probable reserves of 6.36.1 billion equity pounds of copper and 7.26.7 million equity ounces of gold as of December 31, 2004, which approximated 2003 reserves, notwithstanding depletion of approximately 450 million equity pounds of copper and 500,000 equity ounces of gold.2005.

In addition, exploration and mine development efforts in 2004 focused onAt the Ahafo and Akyem projects in Ghana, substantially increasing proven and probable reserves thereincreased by 3.01.6 million and 1.1 million equity ounces, respectively. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the Company reported reserves of 10.612.2 million ounces at Ahafo and 5.46.5 million equity ounces at Akyem.

For additional information, see Item 2, Properties, Proven and Probable Reserves.

Licenses and Concessions

Other than operating licenses for our mining and processing facilities, there are no third party patents, licenses or franchises material to Newmont’sour business. In many countries, however, we conduct our mining and exploration activities pursuant to concessions granted by, or under contract with, the host government. These countries include, among others, Australia, Bolivia, Canada, Ghana, Indonesia, Peru, New Zealand, Mexico and Uzbekistan. The concessions and contracts are subject to the political risks associated with foreign operations. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, Risks Related to Newmont Operations, below. For a more detailed description of our Indonesian ContractsContract of Work, see Item 2, Properties, below.

Condition of Physical Assets and Insurance

Our business is capital intensive, requiring ongoing capital investment for the replacement, modernization or expansion of equipment and facilities. For more information, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, below.

We maintain insurance policies against property loss and business interruption and insure against risks that are typical in the operation of our business, in amounts that we believe to be reasonable. Such insurance, however, contains exclusions and limitations on coverage, particularly with respect to environmental liability and political risk. There can be no assurance that claims would be paid under such insurance policies in connection with a particular event. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, Risks Related to Newmont Operations, below.

Environmental Matters

Newmont’s United States mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, including the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act; the Endangered Species Act; the Federal Land Policy and Management Act; the National Environmental Policy Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; and related state laws. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. Newmont’sOur activities outside the United States are also subject to governmental regulations for the protection of the environment. In general, environmental regulations have not had, and are not expected to have, a material adverse impact on Newmont’sour operations or our competitive position.

We conduct our operations so as to protect public health and the environment and believe our operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. Each operating Newmont mine has a reclamation plan in place that meets all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations. We have made estimates of the amount of such expenditures, but cannot precisely predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At December 31, 2004, $410.3 million2005, $431 was accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently producing mineral properties.

Newmont isWe are also involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former, primarily historic, mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites. We believe that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are

similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the activities required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon our best estimate of our liability for these matters, $74.9 million$77 was accrued as of December 31, 20042005 for such obligations associated with properties previously owned or operated by Newmontus or our subsidiaries. These amounts are included inOther current liabilities andReclamation andremediation liabilities.Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, we believe that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 81%101% greater or 34% lower than the amount accrued as of December 31, 2004.2005. The amounts accrued for these matters are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are charged to costs and expenses in the period estimates are revised.

For a discussion of the most significant reclamation and remediation activities, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Notes 1513 and 2730 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, below.

Employees

There were approximately 14,00015,000 people employed by Newmont and our affiliates worldwide atas of December 31, 2004.

2005.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this report (including information incorporated by reference) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and

Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under these sections. Our forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by those forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not

limited to: the price of gold, copper and copper;other commodities; currency fluctuations; geological and metallurgical assumptions; operating performance of equipment, processes and facilities; labor relations; timing of receipt of necessary governmental permits or approvals; domestic and foreign laws or regulations, particularly relating to the environment and mining; domestic and international economic and political conditions; the ability of Newmont to obtain or maintain necessary financing; and other risks and hazards associated with mining operations. More detailed information regarding these factors is included in Item 1, Business, Item 1A, Risk Factors, and elsewhere throughout this report. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Newmont or to persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Newmont disclaims any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

Available Information

Newmont maintains an internet web site atwww.newmont.com.www.newmont.com. Newmont makes available, free of charge, through the Investor Information section of the web site, its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Section 16 filings and all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Newmont has provided same day access to such reports through its web site since November 15, 2002. Newmont’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of key committees of its Board of Directors and its Code of Business Ethics and Conduct are also available on the web site. Any of the foregoing information is available in print to any stockholder who requests it by contacting Newmont’s Investor Relations Department.

The Company filed with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on May 24, 2004,26, 2005, the annual certification by its Chief Executive Officer, certifying that, as of the date of the certification, he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards, as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Company has filed the required certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding the quality of its public disclosures as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report.

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Every investor or potential investor in Newmont should carefully consider the following risks, which have been separated into two groups:

Risks Related to the Mining Industry Generally

A Substantial or Extended Decline in Gold or Copper Prices Would Have a Material Adverse Effect on Newmont

Newmont’s business is dependent on the pricesrealized price of gold and copper, which are affected by numerous factors beyond Newmont’sour control. Factors tending to put downward pressure on the prices of gold and copper include:

Any drop in the pricesrealized price of gold or copper adversely impacts our revenues, profitsnet income and cash flows, particularly in light of our philosophy of avoiding gold hedging. Newmont hasWe have recorded asset write-downs in prior years as a resultduring periods of low gold prices in the past and may experience additional asset impairments as a result of low gold or copper prices in the future.

In addition, sustained low gold or copper prices can:

Also see the discussion in Item 1, Business, Gold or Copper Price.

Gold and Copper Producers Must Continually Obtain Additional Reserves

Gold and copper producers must continually replace reserves depleted by production. Depleted reserves must be replaced by expanding known ore bodies or by locating new deposits in order for producers to maintain production levels over the long term. Exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and frequently is unproductive. No assurances can be given that any of our new or ongoing exploration programs will result in new mineral producing operations. Once mineralization is discovered, it maywill likely take many years from the initial phases of drillingexploration until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change.

Estimates of Proven and Probable Reserves Are Uncertain

��

Estimates of proven and probable reserves are subject to considerable uncertainty. Such estimates are, to a large extent, based on interpretations of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques. Producers use feasibility studies to derive estimates of capital and operating costs based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the predicted configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of metals from the ore, the costs of comparable facility,facilities, the costs of operating and processing equipment operating costs, and other factors. Actual operating costs and economic returns on projects may differ significantly from original estimates. Further, it may take many years from the initial phase of drillingexploration before production is possible and, during that time, the economic feasibility of exploiting a discovery may change.

Increased Costs Could Affect Profitability

Costs at any particular mining location frequently are subject to variation from one year to the next due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade, changing metallurgy and revisions to mine plans in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities, such as fuel, electricity and electricity. Such commoditieslabor. Commodity costs are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. Reported costs may be affected by changes in accounting standards. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on Newmont’s profitability.

Mining Accidents or Other Adverse Events or Conditions at a Mining Location Could Reduce Our Production Levels

At any of Newmont’s operations, production may fall below historic or estimated levels as a result of mining accidents such as a pit wall failure in an open pit mine, or cave-ins or flooding at underground mines. In addition, production may be unexpectedly reduced at a location if, during the course of mining, unfavorable ground conditions or seismic activity are encountered; ore grades are lower than expected; the physical or metallurgical characteristics of the ore are less amenable to mining or treatment than expected; or our equipment, processes or facilities fail to operate properly or as expected.

Mining Companies Are Subject to Extensive Environmental Laws and Regulations

Newmont’s exploration, mining and processing operations are regulated in all countries in which we operate under various federal, state, provincial and local laws relating to the protection of the environment, which generally include air and water quality, hazardous waste management and reclamation. Delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain, government permits and approvals may adversely impact our operations. The regulatory environment in which Newmont operates could change in ways that would substantially increase costs to achieve compliance, or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on Newmont’s operations or financial position. For a more detailed discussion of potential environmental liabilities, see the discussion in Environmental Matters, Note 2730 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Risks Related to Newmont Operations

Our Operations Outside North America and Australia Are Subject to Risks of Doing Business Abroad

Exploration, development and production activities outside of North America and Australia are potentially subject to political and economic risks, including:

Consequently, Newmont’s exploration, development and production activities outside of North America and Australia may be substantially affected by factors beyond Newmont’s control, any of which could materially

adversely affect Newmont’s financial position or results of operations. Furthermore, in the event ofif a dispute arisingarises from such activities, Newmont may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts outside North America or Australia, which could adversely affect the outcome of a dispute.

Newmont has substantial investments in Indonesia, a nation that since 1997 has undergone financial crises and devaluation of its currency, outbreaks of political and religious violence, changes in national leadership, and the secession of East Timor, one of its former provinces. These factors heighten the risk of abrupt changes in the national policy toward foreign investors, which in turn could result in unilateral modification of concessions or contracts, increased taxation, denial of permits or permit renewals or expropriation of assets. If this were to occur with respect to the Batu Hijau Contract of Work,operation, Newmont’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In July 2004, a criminal complaint was filed against P.T. Newmont Minahasa Raya (“PTNMR”),PTNMR, the Newmont subsidiary that operated the Minahasa mine in Indonesia, alleging environmental pollution relating to submarine tailings placement into nearby Buyat Bay. The Indonesian police detained five PTNMR employees during September and October of 2004. The police investigation and the detention of PTNMR’s employees was declared illegal by the South Jakarta District Court in December 2004, but in March 2005, the Indonesian Supreme Court upheld the legality of 2004,the police investigation, and the police have appealed that decisionturned their evidence over to the Indonesian Supreme Court. A civil lawsuit, which waslocal prosecutor. In July 2005, the prosecutor filed by three residents ofan indictment against PTNMR and its President Director, alleging environmental pollution at Buyat Pante, a village located nearBay. After the Minahasa mine, was settled without paymentcourt rejected motions to dismiss the plaintiffsproceeding, the prosecutor called its first witnesses in December 2004. In addition, onOctober 2005. The trial is continuing and is expected to conclude in mid-2006.

On March 9, 2005, the Indonesian Ministry of the Environment reportedly filed a civil lawsuit against PTNMRPT Newmont Minahasa Raya (“PTNMR”) and itsit’s President Director in relation to these allegations.

allegations, seeking in excess of $100 in monetary damages. In October 2005, PTNMR filed an objection to the court’s jurisdiction, contending that the Government previously agreed to resolve any disputes through out-of-court conciliation or arbitration. The Court upheld PTNMR’s objection and dismissed the case in November 2005. The Government filed a notice appeal of this ruling. On February 16, 2006, PTNMR and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia signed an agreement settling the civil lawsuit. Under the terms of the agreement, the Government and PTNMR will nominate members to an independent scientific panel that will develop and implement a ten-year environmental monitoring and assessment program to make a definitive, scientific conclusion regarding the condition of Buyat Bay. PTNMR is required to fund specific remedial measures if, as a result of its mining operations, pollution has occurred. The agreement also provides for enhanced community development programs in North Sulawesi. PTNMR will provide initial funding of $12 to cover the cost of the monitoring and community development programs. Over a ten year period, PTNMR will contribute an additional $18. The funds will be managed by an organization governed by interested stakeholders. Accountability for the funds will be ensured through yearly reports that will be made available to the public. The transparency of the scientific panel’s activities will also be assured through annual reports to the public. The agreement is expected to end the civil lawsuit against PTNMR.

Independent sampling and testing of Buyat Bay water and fish, as well as area residents, conducted by the World Health Organization and the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization,

confirm that PTNMR has not polluted the Buyat Bay environment, and, therefore, has not adversely affected the fish in theBuyat Bay or the health of nearby residents. The Company remains steadfast that it has not caused pollution or health problems and will continue to vigorously defend itself against these allegations. However, Newmont cannot predict the outcome of these actionsthe criminal proceeding or whether additional legal actions may occur. Any of these actionsThis matter could adversely affect our ability to operate in Indonesia.

During the last several years, Minera Yanacocha, of which Newmont owns a 51.35% interest, has been the target of numerous local political protests, including ones that blocked the road between the Yanacocha mine complex and the cityCity of Cajamarca in Peru. During SeptemberIn 2004, individuals fromlocal opposition to the Cajamarca region conducted a sustained blockade of the road in protest of drilling activities at Cerro Quilish one of the ore deposits within theproject became so pronounced that Yanacocha mine complex. Yanacocha suspended alldecided to relinquish its drilling activities at Cerropermit for Quilish and the blockadedeposit was resolved. At the request of Yanacocha, the Cerro Quilish drilling permit was revoked in November 2004. Newmont has reassessed the challenges involved in obtaining required permits for Cerro Quilish primarily related to increased community concerns. Based upon this reassessment, Newmont has reclassified the deposit’s 1.98 million equity gold ounces from proven and probable reserves to mineralizednon-reserve mineralization. In 2005, no material not in reserves as of December 31, 2004.roadblocks or protests

occurred involving Yanacocha. We cannot predict, however, whether thesesuch incidents will continue, nor can werecur in the future, and the recurrence of significant community opposition or protests could adversely affect Minera Yanacocha’s assets and operations in Peru, and could lead to the reclassification of other deposits out of reserves.

Presidential, congressional and regional elections will take place in Peru in 2006, and a new national government will take office in July 2006. We cannot predict the new government’s continuing positions on foreign investment, mining concessions, land tenure, environmental regulation or taxation. The continuation or intensification of protests or aA change in prior governmentalgovernment positions on these issues could adversely affect Yanacocha’s assets and operations in Peru.

During 2005, relations between the Republic of Uzbekistan and the U.S. deteriorated significantly, and in July 2005 the government of Uzbekistan evicted the U.S. military from its base at Karshi-Khanabad, south of Tashkent. A further deterioration of relations between the two countries could adversely affect our ability to operate in Uzbekistan.

Recent violence committed by radical elements in Indonesia and other countries, and the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, may increase the risk that operations owned by U.S. companies will be the target of further violence. If any of Newmont’s operations were so targeted it could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our Success May Depend on Our Social and Environmental Performance

Newmont’s ability to operate successfully in communities around the world will likely depend on our ability to develop, operate and close mines in a manner that is consistent with the health and safety of our employees, the protection of the environment, and the creation of long-term economic and social opportunities in the communities in which we operate. Newmont has implemented a management system designed to promote continuous improvement in health and safety, environmental performance and community relations. However, our ability to operate may be adversely impacted by accidents or events detrimental (or perceived to be detrimental) to the health and safety of our employees, the environment or the communities in which we operate.

Remediation Costs for Environmental Liabilities May Exceed the Provisions We Have Made

Newmont has conducted extensive remediation work at two inactive sites in the United States. At one of these sites, remediation requirements have not been finally determined, and, therefore, the final cost cannot be determined. At a third site in the United States, an inactive uranium mine and mill formerly operated by a subsidiary of Newmont, remediation work at the mill is ongoing, but remediation at the mine is subject to dispute and has not yet commenced. The environmental standards that may ultimately be imposed at this site remain uncertain and there is a risk that the costs of remediation may exceed the provision that has been made for such remediation by a material amount.

For a more detailed discussion of potential environmental liabilities, see the discussion in Environmental Matters, Note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Whenever a previously unrecognized remediation liability becomes known, or a previously estimated reclamation cost is increased, the amount of that liability orand additional cost canwill be recorded at that time and could materially reduce net income in that period.

The Use of Hedging Instruments May Prevent Gains Being Realized from Subsequent Price Increases

Newmont does not intend to enter into material new gold hedging positions and intends to continue to decrease gold hedge positions over time by opportunistically delivering gold into our existingoutstanding hedge contracts, or

by seeking to eliminate our hedge position when economically attractive. Nonetheless, Newmont currently has gold hedging positions and may, from time-to-time, enter into hedge contracts for copper, other metals or commodities, interest rates or foreign currencies. In 2004, Newmont entered into copper hedging positions covering approximately 459 million pounds of copper. If the gold, copper or other metal price rises above the price at which future production has been committed under these hedge instruments, Newmont will have an

opportunity loss. However, if the gold, copper or other metal price falls below that committed price, Newmont’s revenues will be protected to the extent of such committed production. In addition, we may experience losses if a hedge counterparty defaults under a contract when the contract price exceeds the gold, copper or other metal price.

For a more detailed description of the Newmont hedge positions, see the discussion in Hedging in Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, and Note 1621 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Currency Fluctuations May Affect Costs

Currency fluctuations may affect the costs that we incur at our operations. Gold is sold throughout the world based principally on the U.S. dollar price, but a portion of Newmont’s operating expenses are incurred in local currencies. The appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies against the U.S. dollar can increase the costs of gold production in U.S. dollar terms at mines located outside the United States, making such mines less profitable. The foreign currencies that primarily impact Newmont’s results of operations are the Australian and Canadian dollars.

During 2004,2005, the Australian and Canadian dollars strengthened by an average of 13%5% and 7%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar. This increased U.S. dollar reported operating costsCosts applicable to sales in Australia and Canada by approximately $56.6 million$24 and $4.8 million, respectively.$3, respectively from 2004 to 2005. For additional information, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Results of Operations, Foreign Currency Exchange Rates, below. For a more detailed description of how currency exchange rates may affect costs, see discussion in Foreign Currency in Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our Level of Indebtedness May Affect Our Business

As of December 31, 2004,2005, Newmont had debt of $1.6 billion,$1,929, as compared to $1.1 billion$1,602 as of December 31, 2003.2004. We expect to spend significant funds on capital expenditures essential to existing operations as well as for acquisitions and new project development. Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences for our operations, including:

Newmont expects to be able to pay principal and interest on our debt by utilizing cash flow from operations, and Newmont’sour ability to meet these payment obligations will depend on our future financial performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors. Newmont will not be able to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions in the markets in which Newmont operates. NewmontConsequently, we cannot be certain that our future cash flow from operations will be sufficient to allow us to pay principal and interest on our debt, fund required capital expenditures and meet our other obligations. If cash flow from operations is insufficient, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, utilize existing cash balances, borrow more money or issue additional equity. We cannot be surecertain that we will be able to do soaccomplish any of these measures on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Our Interest in the Batu Hijau Mine in Indonesia May Be Reduced Under the Contract of Work

Under the Batu Hijau Contract of Work with the Indonesian government, beginning in 2005 and continuing through 2010, a portion of each foreign shareholders’shareholder’s equity interest in the Batu Hijau project must be offered for sale to

the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals. The price at which such interest must be offered for sale to the Indonesian parties is the highest of the then-current replacement cost, the price at which shares of the project company would be accepted for listing on the Jakarta Stock Exchange, or the fair market value of such interest in the project company as a going concern. An Indonesian national currently owns a 20% interest in Batu Hijau, which would require Newmont and requires the Newmont/Sumitomo collectively,partnership to offer a 3% interest to the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals in 2006. Pursuant to this provision of the Batu Hijau Contract of Work, it is possible that the ownership interest of the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership in Batu Hijau could be reduced to 49% by the end of 2010.

Costs Estimates and Timing of New Projects Are Uncertain

The capital expenditures and time required to develop new mines or other projects are considerable. Changes in costs or construction schedules can affect project economics. There are a number of factors that can affect costs and construction schedules, including, among others:

Occurrence of Events for Which We Are Not Insured May Affect Our Cash Flow and Overall Profitability

We maintain insurance policies to protect ourselvesthat mitigate against certain risks related to our operations. This insurance is maintained in amounts that we believe to beare reasonable depending upon the circumstances surrounding each identified risk. However, Newmont may elect not to have insurance for certain risks because of the high premiums associated with insuring those risks or for various other reasons; in other cases, insurance may not be available for certain risks. Some concern always exists with respect to investments in parts of the world where civil unrest, war, nationalist movements, political violence or economic crisis are possible. These countries may also pose heightened risks of expropriation of assets, business interruption, increased taxation and a unilateral modification of concessions and contracts. Newmont does not maintain insurance policies against political risk. Occurrence of events for which Newmont is not insured may affect our cash flow and overall profitability.

Our Business Depends on Good Relations with Our Employees

Newmont could experience labor disputes, work stoppages or other disruptions in production that could adversely affect us. AtAs of December 31, 2004,2005, unions represented approximately 20%37% of our worldwide work force. On that date,force: Newmont had 1,0981,243 employees at its Carlin, Nevada operations, 21178 employees in Canada at its Golden Giant operations, 2,7272,822 employees in Indonesia at its Batu Hijau operations, 4142 employees in New Zealand at its Martha operation, 325390 employees in Bolivia at its Kori Kollo operation, 628194 employees at its Australia operations, and 552667 employees in Peru at its Yanacocha operation, working under a collective bargaining agreement or similar labor agreement. Currently there are labor agreements in effect for all of these workers.

Our Earnings Could Be Affected by the Prices of Other Commodities

The earnings of Newmont also could be affected by the prices of other commodities such as fuel and other consumable items, although to a lesser extent than by the price of gold or copper. The prices of these commodities are affected by numerous factors beyond Newmont’s control.

Title to Some of Our Properties May Be Defective or Challenged

Although we have conducted title reviews of our properties, title review does not necessarily preclude third parties from challenging our title. While Newmont believeswe believe that it haswe have satisfactory title to itsour properties, some risk exists that some titles may be defective or subject to challenge. In addition, certain of our Australian properties could be subject to native title or traditional landowner claims, but such claims would not deprive us of the properties. For information regarding native title or traditional landowner claims, see the discussion under the AustraliaAustralia/New Zealand section of Item 2, Properties, below.

We Compete With Other Mining Companies

We compete with other mining companies to attract and retain key executives and other employees with technical skills and experience in the mining industry. We also compete with other mining companies for rights to mine properties containing gold and other minerals. There can be no assurance that Newmont will continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced employees, or to acquire additional rights to mine properties.

Certain Factors Outside of Our Control May Affect Our Ability to Support the Carrying Value of Goodwill

AtAs of December 31, 2004,2005, the carrying value of our goodwill was approximately $3.0 billion$2,879 or 24%21% of our total assets. Such goodwill has been assigned to our Merchant Banking ($1.6 billion)1,562) and Exploration ($1.1 billion)1,126) Segments, and to various mine site reporting units ($0.3 billion in the aggregate)Australia/New Zealand Segment ($191). This goodwill primarily arose in connection with our February 2002 acquisitions of Normandy and Franco-Nevada, and it represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of Normandy and Franco-Nevada. We evaluate, on at least an annual basis, the carrying amount of goodwill to determine whether current events and circumstances indicate that such carrying amount may no longer be recoverable. This evaluation involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of our reporting units to their carrying values.

Based on valuations of the Merchant Banking and Exploration Segments, the Company concluded that the estimated fair values significantly exceeded the respective carrying values as of December 31, 2004.2005. The fair values of the reporting unitsMerchant Banking and Exploration Segments are based in part on certain factors that may be partially or completely outside of our control, such as the investing environment, the discovery of proven and probable reserves, commodity prices and other factors. In addition, certain of the assumptions underlying the December 31, 20042005 Merchant Banking and Exploration valuations may not be easily achieved by the Company, even though such assumptions were based on historical experience and the Company considers such assumptions to be reasonable under the circumstances.

At December 31, 2004, the $1.6 billion carrying value of the Merchant Banking Segment goodwill represented approximately 65% of the carrying value of the total assets of the Merchant Banking Segment. The December 31, 2004 discounted cash flow analysis for the equity portfolio sub-segment of the Merchant Banking Segment assumed: (i) a discount rate of 9%; (ii) a time horizon of ten years; (iii) pre-tax returns on investment ranging from 35% starting in 2005 and gradually declining to 15% in 2012 through 2014; (iv) an initial equity portfolio investment of approximately $0.5 billion; (v) capital infusions of $50 million annually for the next three years; and (vi) a terminal value of approximately $2.2 billion. The December 31, 2004 discounted cash flow analysis for the royalty portfolio sub-segment of the Merchant Banking Segment assumed: (i) a discount rate of 9%; (ii) a time horizon of ten years; (iii) an annual growth rate of 5% in the royalty portfolio; and (iv) a pre-tax rate of return on investment of 13%. The December 31, 2004 discounted cash flow analysis for the portfolio management sub-segment of the Merchant Banking Segment assumed: (i) a discount rate of 9%; (ii) a time horizon of ten years; and (iii) a pre-tax advisory fee of 5% on approximately $0.5 billion of transactions and value-added activities in 2005, with the dollar amount of such transactions and activities increasing by 5% annually thereafter. The December 31, 2004 discounted cash flow analysis for the value realization sub-segment of the Merchant Banking Segment assumed: (i) a discount rate of 9%; (ii) a time horizon of ten years; and (iii) a pre-tax annual return on investments of $4.2 million. The December 31, 2004 discounted cash flow analysis assumed a combined terminal value for the royalty portfolio, portfolio management and downstream gold refining sub-segments of approximately $0.7 billion.

At December 31, 2004, the $1.1 billion carrying value of the Exploration Segment goodwill represented approximately 98% of the carrying value of the total assets of the Exploration Segment. Based on the review of historical additionsAdditions to proven and probable reserves and on management’s expectation of the growth rate and levels of reserve additions that could be expected to continueused in the Company’s valuation models were based on management reviews of historical performance and expectations of future the discounted cash flow model developed to value the Exploration Segment at December 31, 2004 assumed that (i) the Exploration Segment

would be responsible for 11.0 million ounces of additions to proven and probable reserves in 2005; (ii) such additions would increase by 5% annually; and (iii) approximately 9.1%, 8.7%, 8.3% and 7.9% of additions in years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, would represent ounces that had previously been valued in the Normandy purchase accounting. In addition, the discounted cash flow model for the Exploration Segment assumed, among other matters: (i) a 16-year time horizon, including a seven-year time lapse between additions to proven and probable reserves and the initiation of production and a five-year production period; (ii) a discount rate of 8%; (iii) a terminal value of approximately $5.8 billion; (iv) an average gold price of $375 per ounce during the time horizon; (v) total cash costs per ounce of $230; and (vi) capital costs of $50 per ounce. The Company believes that anyreserve additions. Any model used to value the Exploration Segment will need to take into account the relatively long time horizon required to evaluate the activities of the Exploration Segment. Reserve additions may vary significantly from year to year based on the timing of when proven and probable reserves can be reported under the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7. A period of several years may be required to advance a project from initial discovery to proven and probable reserves.

Based on valuations of various mine site reporting units in the Australia/New Zealand Segment, the Company concluded that the estimated fair values exceeded the respective carrying values as of December 31, 2005. The Company concluded that the estimated fair value of the Nevada Segment did not support the carrying value as of December 31, 2005 and recorded a $41 goodwill impairment charge. In 2004, the Company recorded goodwill and long-lived assets impairment charges of $52 and $6, respectively, relating to the Pajingo reporting unit in the Australia/NewZealand Segment. The Company’s fair value estimates are based on numerous assumptions and it is possible that actual fair value could be significantly different than these estimates, as actual future quantities of recoverable minerals, gold and other commodity prices, production levels, operating costs and capital costs are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties.

In the absence of any mitigating valuation factors, the Company’s failure to achieve one or more of the December 31, 20042005 valuation assumptions willmay over time result in an impairment charge. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that significant non-cash impairment charges will not be recorded in the future due to possible declines in the fair values of our reporting units. For a more detailed description of the estimates and assumptions involved in assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Critical Accounting Policies, below.

Our accounting policies and methods of reporting financial condition, including accounting for goodwill, require certain estimates, assumptions and judgments for which there is no clear authoritative guidance. Management makes such estimates, assumptions and judgments in good faith based on what they believe is the best available information. The Company has received from the SEC two letters, dated December 27, 2005 and February 17, 2006, requesting additional information and additional disclosure regarding accounting for Exploration and Merchant Banking Segment goodwill. The Company is responding to these letters and will continue to work with the SEC to resolve any further issues it raises.

Our Ability to Recognize the Benefits of Deferred Tax Assets is DependantDependent on Future Cash Flows and Taxable Income

The Company recognizes the expected future tax benefit from deferred tax assets when the tax benefit is considered to be more likely than not of being realized. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied against deferred tax assets. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows from operations and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company to realize the deferred tax assets recorded at the balance date could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates could limit the Company’s ability to obtain the future tax benefits represented by its deferred tax assets recorded at the balance sheet date.assets. At December 31, 2004,2005, the Company recorded $173.6 million and $491.7 million ofCompany’s current and long-term deferred tax assets were $159 and $517, respectively.

Returns for Investments in Pension Plans Are Uncertain

We maintain defined benefit pension plans for our employees, which provide for specified payments after retirement for certain employees. The ability of the pension plans to provide the specified benefits depends on our funding of the plans and returns on investments made by the plans. Returns, if any, on investments are subject to fluctuations based on investment choices and market conditions. A sustained period of low returns or losses on investments could require us to fund the pension plans to a greater extent than anticipated.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

Gold and Copper Processing Methods

Gold is extracted from naturally-oxidized ores by either heap leaching or milling, depending on the amount of gold contained in the ore and the amenability of the ore to treatment. Higher grade oxide ores are generally processed through mills, where the ore is ground into a fine powder and mixed with water in slurry, which then passes through a cyanide leaching circuit. Lower grade oxide ores are generally processed using heap leaching. Heap leaching consists of stacking crushed or run-of-mine ore on impermeable pads, where a weak cyanide solution is applied to the top surface of the heap to dissolve the gold. In both cases, the gold-bearing solution is then collected and pumped to process facilities to remove the gold by collection on carbon or by zinc precipitation directly from leach solutions.

Gold contained in ores that are not naturally oxidized can be directly milled if the gold is amenable to cyanidization, generally known as free milling sulfide ores. Ores that are not amenable to cyanidization, known as refractory ores, require more costly and complex processing techniques than oxide or free milling ore. Higher-grade refractory ores are processed through either roasters or autoclaves. Roasters heat finely ground ore with air and oxygen to a high temperature, burn off the carbon and oxidize the sulfide minerals that prevent efficient leaching. Autoclaves use heat, oxygen and pressure to oxidize sulfide minerals in the ore.

Some gold-bearing sulfide ores may be processed through a flotation plant or by bio-milling. In flotation, ore is finely ground, turned into slurry, then placed in a tank known as a flotation cell. Chemicals are added to the

slurry causing the gold-containing sulfides to float in air bubbles to the top of the tank, where they can be separated from waste particles that sink to the bottom. The sulfides are removed from the cell and converted into a concentrate that can then be processed in an autoclave or roaster to recover the gold. Bio-milling incorporates patented technology that involves inoculation of suitable crushed ore on a leach pad with naturally occurring bacteria strains, which oxidize the sulfides over a period of time. The ore is then processed through an oxide mill.

At Batu Hijau, mined ore containing copper and gold is crushed to a coarse size at the mine and then transported from the mine via conveyor to a concentrator. The ore is finely ground and then treated by successive stages of flotation, resulting in a concentrate of copper sulfides containing approximately 30% copper. The concentrate is transferred by pipeline to port facilities. At the port, the concentrate is dewatered and stored for later reclaiming and loading onto ships for transport to smelters.

Newmont Properties

Production Properties

Set forth below is a description of theNewmont’s significant production properties of Newmont and its subsidiaries. Total cash costs and total production costsproperties.Costs applicable to sales for each operation are presented in a table in the next section of this Item 2. Total cash costs and total production costs represent measures of performance that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze the cash generating capacities and performance of Newmont’s mining operations. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures toCosts Applicable to Sales as calculated and presented under GAAP, see Item 2, Properties, Operating Statistics.

North AmericaNevada

Nevada.Newmont has been mining gold in Nevada since 1965. Newmont’s Nevada operations include Carlin, located west of the city of Elko on the geologic feature known as the Carlin Trend, the Twin Creeks mine approximately 15 miles north of Golconda, the Lone Tree Complex near the town of Valmy, and the Midas mine near the town of the same name. Newmont also participates in the Turquoise Ridge joint venture with Placer

Dome,Barrick, which utilizes mill capacity at Twin Creeks. The Phoenix gold/copper project, located 10 miles south of Battle Mountain, is under construction with production expected in mid-2006.by April 2006. The Leeville underground project, located on the Carlin Trend northwest of the Carlin East underground mine, is under construction, with completion scheduled for late 2006.

Gold sales from Newmont’s Nevada operations totaled approximately 2.4 million equity ounces for 2004. Ore was2005 with ore mined from 13 open pit mines and four underground mines in 2004. In 2005, initial production will commence at Leeville on the Carlin Trend, the first shaft accessed mine constructed by Newmont in Nevada. Ore production is expected to begin in late 2005 with an annual production rate of 450,000 to 500,000 ounces. At Phoenix, construction commenced in 2004 for this gold/copper project. Upon completion in mid-2006, 370,000 to 420,000 ounces of gold and 16 to 40 million pounds of copper will be produced annually.

mines. At year-end 2004,2005, Newmont reported 3433.3 million equity ounces of gold reserves in Nevada. These reserves are distributed 80%Nevada, with 83% at open pit mines and 20%17% in underground mines. Process methods assumed over the reserve base are 74%76% refractory and 26%24% oxide. Refractory ores require more complex, higher cost processing methods. Refractory ore treatment facilities generated 66%69% of Nevada’s gold production in 2004,2005, compared with 71%68% in 2003,2004, and 66%72% in 2002. In 2005, the percentage of production from refractory treatment facilities is expected to be approximately 67%. Thereafter, the percentage of production from refractory ores is expected to range between 69%–75%.2003.

Newmont’sThe Nevada operations produce gold from a variety of ore types requiring different processing techniques depending on economic and metallurgical characteristics. To schedule the best use of processing capacity, the Company uses a linear programming model to guide the flow of both mining sequence selection and routing of ore streams to various plants. Higher-grade oxide ores are processed by conventional milling and cyanide leaching at Carlin (Mill 5), Twin Creeks (Juniper) and Lone Tree. Lower-grade material with suitable cyanide solubility is treated on heap leach pads at Carlin, Twin Creeks, Lone Tree and Lone Tree.Phoenix. Higher-grade refractory ores are processed through either a roaster at Carlin (Mill 6) or through autoclaves at Twin Creeks (Sage) and Lone Tree. Lower-grade refractory ores are processed by a flotation plant at Lone Tree and either bio-oxidation/flotation or direct flotation at Mill 5. Ore from the Midas mine is processed by conventional milling and Merrill-Crowe zinc precipitation. Activated carbon from the various leaching circuits is treated to produce gold ore at Carlin and Twin Creeks. Zinc precipitate at Midas is refined on-site.

Mining and the final placement of ore on the leach pads at Lone Tree is scheduled to end in third quarter of 2006. Residual leaching will continue thereafter. Milling of stockpiled ore at Lone Tree is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2007.

Newmont owns, or controls through long-term mining leases and unpatented mining claims, all of the minerals and surface area within the boundaries of the present Nevada mining operations (except for the Turquoise Ridge and Getchelljoint venture described below). The long-term leases extend for at least the anticipated mine life of those deposits. With respect to a significant portion of the Gold Quarry mine at Carlin, Newmont owns a 10% undivided interest in the mineral rights and leases the remaining 90%, on which Newmont pays a royalty equivalent to 18% of the mineral production. The remainder of the Gold Quarry mineral rights are wholly-owned or controlled by Newmont, in some cases subject to additional royalties. With respect to certain smaller deposits in the Winnemucca Region, Newmont is obligated to pay royalties on production to third parties that vary from 2% to 5% of production.

Newmont has a 25% interest in a joint venture with a subsidiary of Placer Dome Inc.Barrick to operate the Turquoise Ridge and Getchell mines. Newmont has an agreement to provide up to 2,000 tons per day of milling capacity at Newmont’s Twin Creeks facility to the joint venture. Placer DomeBarrick is the operator of the joint venture for mining and ore delivery to process. Gold sales of 40,70052,300 ounces were attributed to Newmont in 2004,2005, based on its 25% ownership interest.

Newmont has an ore sale agreement with Barrick Goldstrike Mines to provide feed to thesome of Barrick’s facilities operated by Barrick on the Carlin Trend. The agreement provides for the sale of whole ore to Barrick. Newmont recognizesrecognized attributed gold sales, net of the sale price, resulting in gold salestreatment charges, of 28,200104,600 ounces in 2004.

Canada.    Newmont’s Canadian operations include two underground mines. The Golden Giant mine (100% owned) is located approximately 25 miles (40 kilometers) east of Marathon in Ontario, Canada, and has been in production since 1985. The Holloway mine is located approximately 35 miles (56 kilometers) east of Matheson

in Ontario, and about 400 miles (644 kilometers) northeast of Golden Giant, and has been in production since 1996. The Holloway mine is owned by a joint venture in which Newmont has an 84.65% interest. The remaining 15.35% interest is held by Teddy Bear Valley Mines. In 2004, the Golden Giant mine sold 160,000 equity ounces of gold, and the Holloway mine sold 67,400 equity ounces of gold.

Mexico.    Newmont has a 44% interest in the La Herradura mine, which is located in Mexico’s Sonora desert. La Herradura is operated by Industriales Peñoles. The mine is an open pit operation with run-of-mine heap leach recovery. La Herradura sold 68,800 equity ounces of gold in 2004.

2005.

South AmericaYanacocha, Peru

Peru.    The properties of Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (“Yanacocha”) are located approximately 375 miles (604 kilometers) north of Lima and 30 miles (48 kilometers) north of the city of Cajamarca. Yanacocha began production in 1993. Newmont holds a 51.35% interest in Yanacocha. TheYanacocha with the remaining interests are held by Compañia de Minas Buenaventura, S.A.A. (43.65%) and the International Finance Corporation (5%).

Yanacocha has mining rights with respect to a large land position. Yanacocha’s mining rights were acquired through assignments of concessions granted by the Peruvian government to Yanacocha and a related entity. These mining concessions provide for both the right to explore and exploit. However, Yanacocha must first obtain the respective exploration and exploitation permits, which are generally granted in due course. Yanacocha may retain mining concessions indefinitely by paying annual fees and, during exploitation, complying with production obligations or paying assessed fines. Mining concessions are freely assignable or transferable. In 2000, Newmont and Buenaventura consolidated their land holdings in northern Peru, folding them into Yanacocha. The consolidation increased Yanacocha’s land position from 100 to 535 square miles.

The Yanacocha operations contain the Minas Conga deposit, for which a feasibility study was completed in 2004. Yanacocha added 8.73.1 million ounces of gold (4.5(1.6 million equity ounces) and 2.21 billion pounds of copper (1.1 million(0.5 billion equity pounds) to proven and probable reserves at Minas Conga in 2004.

2005.

Yanacocha currently has five separate open pit mines, Carachugo, San José, Maqui Maqui, Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua. Reclamation and/or backfilling activities in the mining areas of Carachugo, San José and Maqui Maqui are currently underway. Cerro Yanacocha and La Quinua are still active pits. In addition, Yanacocha has four leach pads and three processing facilities. Yanacocha’s gold sales for 20042005 totaled 3.043.3 million ounces (1.56(1.7 million equity ounces).

Cerro Quilish is one of the ore deposits within the Yanacocha complex. In July 2004, Yanacocha received a drilling permit for the Cerro Quilish deposit and commenced drilling activities to further define the deposit. During September 2004, individuals from the Cajamarca region conducted a sustained blockade of the road between the City of Cajamarca and the mine site, in protest of these exploration activities. Yanacocha suspended all drilling activities at Cerro Quilish and the blockade was resolved. At the request of Yanacocha, the Cerro Quilish drilling permit was revoked in November 2004. Yanacocha has reassessed the challenges involved in obtaining required permits for Cerro Quilish primarily related to increased community concerns. Based upon this reassessment, Yanacocha has reclassified 3.9 million ounces (1.98 million equity ounces) of gold from proven and probable reserves to mineralized material not in reserves as of December 31, 2004.

Bolivia.    The Kori Kollo open pit mine is on a high plain in northwestern Bolivia near Oruro, on government mining concessions issued to a Bolivian corporation, Empresa Minera Inti Raymi S.A. (“Inti Raymi”), in which Newmont has an 88% interest. The remaining 12% is owned by Mrs. Beatriz Rocabado. Inti Raymi owns and operates the mine. In 2004, the mine sold 21,700 equity ounces of gold. Mining was completed and the mill closed in October 2003. Production has continued from residual leaching. Inti Raymi will begin processing oxide ores on leach pads from the Kori Chaca pit and reprocessing high-grade tailings on a new leach pad in 2005.

Australia/New Zealand

Prior to the acquisition of Normandy, Newmont owned a 50% interest in the Pajingo mine. The remaining 50% interest in Pajingo, and all other Australian and New Zealand properties described in this report, were acquired as part of the acquisition of Normandy in February 2002.

In Australia, mineral exploration and mining titles are granted by the individual states or territories. Mineral titles may also be subject to native title legislation.legislation or, in the Northern Territory, to Aboriginal freehold title legislation that entitles indigenous persons to compensation calculated by reference to the gross value of production. In 1992, the High Court of Australia held that Aboriginal people who have maintained a continuing connection with their land according to their traditions and customs may hold certain rights in respect of the land, such rights commonly referred to as native title. Since the High Court’s decision, Australia has passed legislation providing for the protection of native title and established procedures for Aboriginal people to claim these rights. The fact that native title is claimed with respect to an area, however, does not necessarily mean that native title exists, and disputes may be resolved by the courts.

Generally, under native title legislation, all mining titles granted before January 1, 1994 are valid. Titles granted between January 1, 1994 and December 23, 1996, however, may be subject to invalidation if they were not obtained in compliance with applicable legislative procedures, though subsequent legislation has validated some of these titles. After December 23, 1996, mining titles over areas where native title is claimed to exist became subject to legislative processes that generally give native title claimants the “right to negotiate” with the title applicant for compensation and other conditions. Native title holders do not have a veto over the granting of mining titles, but if agreement cannot be reached, the matter can be referred to the National Native Title Tribunal for decision.

Newmont does not expect that native title claims will have a material adverse effect on any of its operations in Australia. The High Court of Australia determined in an August 2002 decision, which refined and narrowed the scope of native title, that native title does not subsist in minerals in Western Australia and that the rights granted under a mining title would, to the extent inconsistent with asserted native title rights, operate to extinguish those native title rights. Generally, native title is only an issue for Newmont with respect to obtaining new mineral titles or moving from one form of title to another, for example, from an exploration title to a mining title. In these cases, the requirements for negotiation and the possibility of paying compensation may result in delay and increased costs for mining in the affected areas. Similarly, the process of conducting Aboriginal heritage surveys to identify and locate areas or sites of Aboriginal cultural significance can result in additional costs and delay in gaining access to land for exploration and mining-related activities.

In Australia, various ad valorem royalties are paid to state and territorial governments, typically based on a percentage of gross revenues.

Pajingo.    The Pajingo mine(100% owned) is an underground mine located approximately 93 miles (150 kilometers) southwest of Townsville, Queensland and 45 miles (72 kilometers) south of the local township of Charters Towers. Prior to the Normandy acquisition, Newmont owned a 50% interest in Pajingo. Following the Normandy acquisition, Newmont owns 100% of Pajingo. In 2004,2005, Pajingo sold 251,400 equity192,000 ounces of gold.

Yandal.Jundee (Yandal).    In 2004, theThe Yandal operations consisted of the Bronzewing and Jundee mines(100% owned) are situated approximately 435 miles (700 kilometers) northeast of Perth in Western Australia. In 2003, the operations included Wiluna, Bronzewing and Jundee. Operations at Bronzewing ceased during the second quarter of 2004 and the operations were sold the third quarter of 2004. The operationsWiluna operation was sold 379,300 equityin the fourth quarter of 2003. The Jundee mine is the remaining Yandal operation and sold 341,800 ounces of gold in 2004. Newmont owns a 100% interest in Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd, which owns and operates the Yandal mines and nearby mineral exploration licenses. The Wiluna mine, previously part of the Yandal operations, was sold in December 2003. The Bronzewing mine was sold during the third quarter of 2004.2005.

Tanami.    The    Tanami operations include The Granites treatment plant and associated mining operations, which are located in the Northern Territory approximately 342 miles (550 kilometers) northwest of Alice Springs, adjacent to the Tanami highway, and the Dead Bullock Soak mining operations, approximately 25 miles (40 kilometers) west of The Granites. The Tanami operations also includeincluded the Groundrush deposit. Mining at the Groundrush open pit was completed in September 2004. Processing of stockpiles will continue throughcontinued into the first

third quarter of 2005. The Tanami operations have been wholly-owned since April 2003, when Newmont acquired the minority interests in Newmont NFM by means of a scheme of arrangement and buy-back offer under Australian law.

interests.

The operations are predominantly focused on the Callie underground mine at Dead Bullock Soak, with mill feed supplemented by production stockpiles from the Dead Bullock Soak open pit and Windy Hill at The Granites. Ore from all of these operations is processed through The Granites plant with the exception of ore from Groundrush, which iswas processed through the Tanami plant. During 2004,2005, the Tanami operations sold 658,000 equity493,700 ounces of gold.

Kalgoorlie.    The Kalgoorlie operations comprise the Fimiston open pit (commonly referred to as the Super Pit) and Mt. Charlotte underground mine at Kalgoorlie-Boulder, 373 miles (600 kilometers) east of Perth. The mines are managed by Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines Pty Ltd for the joint venture owners, Newmont and Barrick, Gold Corporation, each of which holds a 50% interest. The Super Pit is Australia’s largest gold mine in terms of both gold production and total annual mining volume. During 2004,2005, the Kalgoorlie operations sold 468,400409,600 equity ounces of gold.

Martha.    The Martha open pit mine is located within the town of Waihi, located approximately 68 miles (110 kilometers) southeast of Auckland, New Zealand. Newmont acquired the minority interests in the Martha mine in April 2003, giving it 100% ownership.2003. During 2004,2005, development commencedcontinued on the Favona underground deposit. Production from the Favona minedeposit is scheduled for 2006.2007. The operation sold 130,500 equity163,400 ounces of gold during 2004.2005. The Martha mine does not currently pay royalties. Under new royalty arrangements, a royaltyhowever, Newmont will apply to the Favona mine. The royalty rate is the greater ofpay 1% of gross revenues from gold and silver sales, or 5% of accounting profit.profit, whichever is greater, at Favona.

Boddington.    Boddington is a development project located 81 miles (130 kilometers) southeast of Perth in Western Australia. At December 31, 2005 Boddington iswas owned by Newmont (44.4%), Anglo GoldAngloGold Ashanti Limited (33.3%) and Newcrest Mining Limited (22.2%). An updated feasibility studyIn February 2006, Newmont entered into an agreement to acquire Newcrest’s 22.22% interest in Boddington for A$225 plus applicable stamp duty and similar costs. When the primary ore bodytransaction closes, Newmont’s interest in Boddington will increase to two-thirds. Closing of the transaction is subject to Australian Foreign Investment Review Board, Western Australia Government and other approvals, and is expected to be completed by April 2006. In February 2006, Newmont’s Board of Directors approved the enddevelopment of 2005, and restructuring of current management arrangements is under discussion.

Golden Grove.    Golden Grove is located in Western Australia, approximately 217 miles (350 kilometers) north of Perth. The principal products are zinc and copper concentrates. Golden Grove has two underground mines at the Scuddles and Gossan Hill deposits. Golden Grove sold 43.5 million pounds of copper, 114.8 million pounds of zinc and 19,300 ounces of by-product gold during 2004.Boddington project.

Batu Hijau, Indonesia

Newmont operates Batu Hijau, a producer of copper/gold concentrates, in Indonesia. The Minahasa gold operation completed production in 2004.

Batu Hijau.    Newmontand has a 45% ownership interest in Batu Hijau. Newmont’s interest istherein, held through a partnership with an affiliate of Sumitomo Corporation. Newmont has a 56.25% interest in the partnership and the Sumitomo affiliate holds the remaining 43.75%. The partnership, in turn, owns 80% of P.T. Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”), the subsidiary that owns Batu Hijau. The remaining 20% interest in PTNNT is a carried interest held by P.T. Pukuafu Indah, an unrelated Indonesian company. Through September 30, 2004, PTNNT recorded cumulative losses and therefore Newmont has historically reported a 56.25% economic interest in Batu Hijau. As a result of higher metal prices, improved operating and financial results, and increased life of mine expectations regarding production, costs and economics, PTNNT’s cumulative losses had been recovered by the fourth quarter of 2004, thereby allowing for the payment of dividends. Under existing shareholder agreements, the Indonesian shareholder will be entitled to receive 6% of any dividends paid by PTNNT until such time as a loan to the IndonesiaIndonesian shareholder is fully repaid (including accrued interest). Newmont, therefore, decreased its reportedeconomic interest in Batu Hijau to 52.875%, effective October 1, 2004, reflecting 56.25% of the 94% of PTNNT’s dividends payable to the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership.

Prior to January 1, 2004, we accounted for our investment in Batu Hijau as an equity investment due to each of PTNNT shareholders’ significant participating rights in Batu Hijau’s business. Newmont has identified the Batu Hijau operation as a variable interest entity because of certain capital structures and contractual relationships. Newmont has alsorelationships, and determined that it is the primary beneficiary of Batu Hijau. Therefore, pursuant to FIN 46R, Newmont began to consolidateconsolidated Batu Hijau effective January 1, 2004. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Batu Hijau is located on the island of Sumbawa, approximately 950 miles (1,529 kilometers) east of Jakarta. Batu Hijau is a large porphyry copper/gold deposit which Newmont discovered in 1990. Development and construction activities began in 1997 and start-up took placeoccurred in late 1999. In 2004,2005, copper sales were 378.8572.7 million pounds (302.8 million equity pounds,pounds), while gold sales were 396,300720,500 ounces (381,000 equity ounces.

ounces).

In Indonesia, rights are granted to foreign investors to explore for and to develop mineral resources within defined areas through Contracts of Work entered into with the Indonesian government. In 1986, NewmontPTNNT entered into a Contract of Work with the centralIndonesian government covering Batu Hijau, under which NewmontPTNNT was granted the exclusive right to explore in the contract area, construct any required facilities, extract and process the mineralized materials, and sell and export the minerals produced, subject to certain requirements including Indonesian government approvals and payment of royalties to the government. Under the Contract of Work, PTNNT has the right to continue operating the project for 30 years from operational start-up, or longer if approved by the Indonesian government.

Under the Batu Hijau Contract of Work, beginning in 2005 and continuing through 2010, a portion of the project must be offered for sale to the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals, equal to the difference between the following percentages and the percentage of shares already owned by the Indonesian government or Indonesian nationals (if such number is positive): 15%, by the end of the 2005; 23%, by the end of 2006; 30%, by the end of 2007; 37%, by the end of 2008, 44%, by the end of 2009; and 51%, by the end of 2010. The price at which such interest must be offered for sale to the Indonesian parties is the highest of the then-current replacement cost, the price at which shares of the project company would be accepted for listing on the Jakarta Stock Exchange, or the fair market value of such interest as a going concern.

An Indonesian national currently owns a 20% interest in Batu Hijau, which would require Newmont and requires the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership to offer a 3% interest in Batu Hijau to the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals in 2006. Pursuant to this provision, it is possible that the ownership interest of the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership in Batu Hijau could be reduced to 49% by the end of 2010.

Other Operations

Minahasa.Canada.    Newmont’s Canadian operations include two underground mines. The Golden Giant mine (100% owned) is located approximately 25 miles (40 kilometers) east of Marathon in Ontario, Canada, and has been in production since 1985. Mining operations at Golden Giant were completed in December 2005 with final mill production and gold sales expected in the first quarter of 2006. In 2005, the Golden Giant mine sold 162,000 ounces of gold. The Holloway mine is located approximately 35 miles (56 kilometers) east of Matheson in Ontario, and about 400 miles (644 kilometers) northeast of Golden Giant, and has been in production since 1996. The Holloway mine is 100% owned as of October 2005. At December 31, 2005 the Company classified the Holloway mine as an asset held for sale. Operating results for Holloway have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Mexico.    Newmont has a 44% interest in the La Herradura mine, which is located in Mexico’s Sonora desert. La Herradura is operated by Industriales Peñoles and comprises an open pit operation with run-of-mine heap leach processing. La Herradura sold 80,200 equity ounces of gold in 2005.

Bolivia.    The Kori Kollo open pit mine is on a high plain in northwestern Bolivia near Oruro, on government mining concessions issued to a Bolivian corporation, Empresa Minera Inti Raymi S.A. (“Inti Raymi”), in which Newmont has an 88% interest. The remaining 12% is owned by Mrs. Beatriz Rocabado.

Inti Raymi owns and operates the mine. The mill was closed in October 2003 and production continued from residual leaching. In 2005, additional material from the stockpiles and Lla Llagua pit were placed on the existing leach pad and ore from the Kori Chaca pit was processed on a new leach pad. In 2005, the mine sold 83,200 equity ounces of gold.

Minahasa, Indonesia.    Newmont owns 80% of Minahasa. TheMinahasa and the remaining 20% interest is a carried interest held by P.T. Tanjung Serapung, an unrelated Indonesian company. Prior to November 2001, 100% of Minahasa’s gold production was attributed to Newmont. As of November 2001, Newmont had recouped a sufficient amount of its investment in Minahasa to entitle the Indonesian shareholder to receive 6% of any dividends distributed after that date. As a result, 94% of Minahasa’s gold production has been attributed to Newmont since November 2001.

Minahasa,is located on the island of Sulawesi, approximately 1,500 miles (2,414 kilometers) northeast of Jakarta, was a Newmont discovery. Production began in 1996 and miningJakarta. Mining was completed in late 2001. The remaining stockpiles were processed by August2001 and gold production was completed in 2004. In 2004, Minahasa sold 70,200 equity ounces of gold. See Note 2730 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding Minahasa.

Central Asia

Zarafshan.Uzbekistan.    Newmont has a 50% interest in the Zarafshan-Newmont Joint Venture in Uzbekistan. Ownership of the remaining 50% interest is divided between the State Committee for Geology and Mineral Resources and the Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combine, each a state entity of Uzbekistan. The joint venture produces gold by crushing and leaching ore from existing stockpiles of low-grade oxide material from the nearby

government-owned Muruntau mine, located in the Kyzylkum Desert. The gold produced by Zarafshan-Newmont is sold in international markets for U.S. dollars. Zarafshan-Newmont sold 210,100122,700 equity ounces of gold in 2004.