UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year endedApril 30, 20062007 or

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number0-5286

KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(704) 873-7202

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock $2.50 par value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  Yes  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $15,614,843,$13,820,231, based on the last reported sale price of the registrant’s Common Stock on October 31, 2005,2006, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Only shares beneficially owned by directors of the registrant (excluding shares subject to options) and each person owning more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock of the registrant were excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of July 5, 2006,2007, the registrant had outstanding 2,492,2702,507,770 shares of Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Those portions of the Company’s proxy statement for use in connection with Kewaunee Scientific Corporation’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held on August 23, 2006,22, 2007, indicated in this report are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II andPart III hereof.

2

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Our principal business is the design, manufacture and installation of laboratory and technical furniture products. Laboratory furniture products include both steel and wood cabinetry, fume hoods, flexible systems, and worksurfaces. Technical furniture products include workstations, workbenches, computer enclosures, and network storage systems.

Our products are sold primarily through purchase orders and contracts submitted by customers through our dealers and commissioned agents and a national distributor, as well as through competitive bids submitted by us and our subsidiaries in India and Singapore. Products are sold principally to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, industrial, chemical and commercial research laboratories, educational institutions, healthcare institutions, governmental entities, manufacturing facilities, and users of networking furniture. We consider the markets in which we compete to be highly competitive, with a significant amount of the business involving competitive public bidding.

It is common in the laboratory furniture industry for customer orders to require delivery at extended future dates, as products are frequently to be installed in buildings yet to be constructed. Changes or delays in building construction may cause delays in delivery of the orders and our recognition of the sale. Since prices are normally quoted on a firm basis in the industry, we bear the burden of possible increases in labor and material costs between receipt of an order and delivery of the product. The impact of such possible increases is considered when determining the sales price.

Our need for working capital and our credit practices are comparable to those of other companies manufacturing, selling, and installing similar products in similar markets. Since our products are used in building construction products,projects, in many cases payments for our laboratory products are received over longer periods of time than payments for many other types of manufactured products, thus requiring increased working capital. In addition, payment terms associated with certain projects provide for a retention amount until completion of the project, thus also increasing required working capital. On average, payments for our products are received during the quarter following shipment, with the exception of the retention amounts which are collected at the completion of the project.

The principal raw materials and products manufactured by others used by us in our products are cold-rolled carbon and stainless steel, hardwood lumber and plywood, paint, chemicals, resins, hardware, plumbing and electrical fittings. Such materials and products are purchased from multiple suppliers and are typically readily available.

We hold various patents and patent rights but do not consider that our success or growth is dependent upon our patents or patent rights. Our business is not dependent upon licenses, franchises or concessions.

Our business is not generally cyclical, although sales are sometimes lower during our third quarter because of slower construction activity in certain areas of the country during the winter months. Our business is not dependent on any one or a few customers; however, sales to our national distributor, VWR International, represented 13 percent, 14 percent, 15 percent, and 1115 percent of our total sales in fiscal years 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004,2005, respectively.

Our order backlog at April 30, 20062007 was $36.4$51.1 million, as compared to $36.4 million at April 30, 2006 and $40.6 million at April 30, 2005 and $43.1 million at April 30, 2004.2005. All but $3.3$7.9 million of the backlog at April 30, 20062007 was scheduled for shipment during fiscal year 2007;2008; however, it may reasonably be expected that delays in shipments will

3

occur because of customer rescheduling or delay in completion of projects which involve the installation of our products. Based on scheduled shipment dates and past experience, we expect that more than 9080 percent of our order backlog at April 30, 20062007 will be shipped during fiscal year 2007.2008.

Segment Information

See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information concerning our Domestic and International business segments.

Competition

We consider the industries in which we compete to be highly competitive and believe that the principal competitive factors are price, product performance, and customer service. A significant portion of our business is based upon competitive public bidding.

Research and Development

The amount spent by us during the fiscal year ended April 30, 20062007 on research and development activities related to new or re-designed products was $760,000.$945,000. The amounts spent for similar purposes in the fiscal years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005 were $760,000 and 2004 were $785,000, and $791,000, respectively.

Environmental Compliance

In the last three fiscal years, compliance with federal, state or local provisions enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment has had no material effect on us. There are no material capital expenditures anticipated for such purposes, and no material effect therefrom is anticipated on our earnings or competitive position.

Employees

At April 30, 2006,2007, we had 471433 domestic employees and 95121 international employees.

Other Information

Our internetInternet address iswww.kewaunee.com. We make available, free of charge through this web site, our annual report to stockholders. Our Form 10-K and 10-Q financial reports may be obtained by stockholders by writing the Secretary of the Company, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, P.O. Box 1842, Statesville, NC 28687-1842. The public may also obtain information on our reports, proxy, and information statements at the SEC internetInternet sitewww.sec.gov.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Certain statements included and referenced in this report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could significantly impact results or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, economic, competitive, governmental, and technological factors affecting our operations, markets, products, services, and prices, as well as prices for certain raw materials and energy. The cautionary statements made by us pursuant to the Reform Act herein and elsewhere should not be construed as exhaustive. We cannot always predict what factors would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. In addition, readers are urged to consider statements that include the terms “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “plans,” “objectives,” “anticipates,” “intends” or the like to be uncertain and forward-looking.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Included herein in Part III, Item 10(b) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

4

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risks before youryou decide to buy shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs,occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our common stock would decline, and you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our stock.

This and other public reports may contain forward-looking statements based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those forward-looking statements as resultsa result of many factors, as more fully described below and elsewhere in our public reports. We do not undertake to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reasons, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

If we fail to compete effectively, our revenue and profit margins could decline.

We face a variety of competition in all of the markets in which we participate. Competitive pricing, including price competition or the introduction of new products, could have material adverse effects on our revenues and profit margins.

Our ability to compete effectively depends to a significant extent on the specification or approval of our products by architects, engineers, and customers. If a significant segment of those communities were to decide that the design, materials, manufacturing, testing or quality control of our products is inferior to that of any of our competitors, our sales and profits would be materially and adversely affected.

If we lose a large customer, our sales and profits would decline.

We have substantial sales to one large customer. In particular, one customerThat distributor accounted for 14%13% of our net sales in fiscal year 2006.2007. Loss of all or a part of our sales to a large customer would have a material effect on our revenues and profits.

An increase in the price of raw materials could negatively affect our sales and profits.

Our principal raw materials are steel, including stainless steel, wood and epoxy resin. Numerous factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions, competition, worldwide demand, labor costs, energy costs, and import duties and other trade restrictions, influence prices for our raw materials. In March 2002, for example, the United States imposed tariffs on several types of imported steel, which increased our cost of steel. In addition, consolidation among domestic integrated steel producers, changes in supply and demand in steel markets, the weakening United States dollar and other events have led to increased steel costs. The domestic steel market is heavily influenced by three major United States manufacturers. Worldwide demand for steel is strong. We have not always been able, and in the future we might not be able, to increase our product prices in amounts that correspond to increaseincreases in costs of raw materials, without materially and adversely affecting our sales and profits. We have not attempted to hedge against changes in prices of steel or other raw materials.

Our future growth may depend on our ability to penetrate new international markets.

International laws and regulations, construction customs, standards, techniques and methods differ from those in the United States. Significant challenges of conducting business in foreign countries include, among other factors, local acceptance of our products, political instability, currency controls, changes in import and export regulations, changes in tariff and freight rates, and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.

5

Events outside our control may affect our operating results.

We have little control over the timing of our customer shipments. Shipments that we anticipate in one quarter may occur in another quarter, affecting both quarters’ results. Weather conditions, such as unseasonably warm, cold or wet weather, can affect and sometimes delay projects. Political and economic events can also affect our revenues. When sales do not meet our expectations, our operating results will be reduced for the relevant quarters.

Our principal markets are in the laboratory building construction industry. This industry is subject to significant volatility due to various factors, none of which is within our control. Declines in construction activity or demand for our products could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We depend on key management and technical personnel, the loss of whom could harm our business.

We depend on certain key management and technical personnel. The loss of one or more key employees may materially and adversely affect us. Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified technical, marketing and management personnel necessary for the maintenance and expansion of our activities. We might not be able to attract or retain such personnel.

Our stock price is likely to be volatile and could drop.

The trading price of our Common Stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarter to quarter variation in operating results, announcement of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the construction and construction materials industries, relatively low trading volume in our Common Stock and other events or factors. In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price fluctuations. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of those companies. Securities market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.

We are subject to a number of significant risks that might cause our actual results to vary materially from our forecasts, targets, or projections, including:

FailureThe implementation of a new information technology system may disrupt our operations.

Our ability to design, manufacture, market and service our products is dependent on information technology systems that encompass all of our internal control overmajor business functions. We are in the process of implementing a comprehensive enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) software system. This new ERP system will cover many areas of our business. System failure or malfunctioning may result in disruption of operations and the inability to process transactions and could adversely affect our financial reporting could harmresults. If we encounter unforeseen delays or difficulties or significant increased costs in implementing our system, our business and financial results.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of the

6

consolidated financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of our assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets thatcondition could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud.adversely affected.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We own and operate three adjacent manufacturing facilities in Statesville, North Carolina. These facilities also house our corporate offices, as well as sales and marketing, administration, engineering and drafting personnel. These facilities together comprise approximately 382,000 square feet and are located on approximately 20 acres of land. In addition, at April 30, 2006,2007, we leased our primary distribution facility and other warehouse facilities totaling 164,000160,000 square feet in Statesville, North Carolina. We also lease and operate a manufacturing facility in Bangalore, India totaling approximately 16,000 square feet.

All of the facilities which we own are held free and clear of any encumbrances. We believe our facilities are suitable for their respective uses and are adequate for our current needs.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in certain disputes and litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the ordinary course of business. Further, we periodically are subject to government audits and inspections. We believe that any such matters presently pending will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not Applicable.

7

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded in the NASDAQ National Market system, under the symbol KEQU. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low prices reported on the NASDAQ National Market System.

As of June 30, 2006,July 5, 2007, we estimate there were approximately 1,000 stockholders of our common shares, of which 243225 were stockholders of record. We paid cash dividends of $0.28 per share for each of the fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005. We currently expect to pay dividends in the future in line with our actual and anticipated future operating results.

Performance Graph

The graph below sets forth a comparison of the Company’s annual stockholder return with the annual stockholder return of (i) the Nasdaq Market Index, and (ii) an index of Nasdaq, non-financial companies with similar market capitalizations to the Company. The graph is based on an investment of $100 on May 1, 2002 (the first trading day of the Company’s fiscal year beginning on that date) in the Company’s common stock, assuming dividend reinvestment. The graph is not an indicator of the future performance of the Company. Thus, it should not be used to predict the future performance of the Company’s stock. The graph and related data were furnished by Hemscott, Inc., Richmond, Virginia.

In addition to the Company, the Similar Market Capitalization Index is comprised of the following companies: Amtech Systems, Inc.; Arotech Corporation; Jaco Electronics, Inc.; Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc.; Point.360; Pyramid Breweries Inc.; and Tripos, Inc. Consistent with the prior year, the Company used for an index companies with a market capitalization similar to that of the Company (the “Peer Group”). The Peer Group index was used because there exists no applicable published industry index or line-of-business index, and the Company does not believe it can reasonably identify a peer group of companies in its industry because the Company’s primary competitors are either divisions of larger corporations or are privately owned.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plan

See Item 12 in this Form 10-K for a discussion of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

8

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial information for each of the five years ended April 30, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002;2003; this information is derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the most recent three years of which appear elsewhere herein. The data presented below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto and “Item 7—7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.

9

		As of April 30
$ in thousands		2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Current assets		$	28,514		$	31,398		$	26,780		$	31,536		$	24,986
Current liabilities			16,183			20,373			16,399			18,919			13,328
Net working capital			12,331			11,025			10,381			12,617			11,658
Net property, plant and equipment			11,255			11,163			10,730			11,362			11,791
Total assets			45,240			50,472			46,212			50,461			43,654
Total borrowings/long-term debt			4,325			9,059			5,127			9,045			3,346
Stockholders’ equity			24,048			25,546			25,989			26,791			25,938
OTHER DATA:
Capital expenditures		$	1,724		$	1,886		$	976		$	1,619		$	3,143
Year-end stockholders of record			225			243			252			265			273
Year-end employees (domestic)			433			471			484			533			543

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this document constitute “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could significantly impact results or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, economic, competitive, governmental, and technological factors affecting our operations, markets, products, services, and prices. The cautionary statements made pursuant to the Reform Act herein and elsewhere by us should not be construed as exhaustive. We cannot always predict what factors would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. In addition, readers are urged to consider statements that include the terms “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “plans,” “objectives,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the like to be uncertain and forward-looking. Over time, our actual results, performance or achievements will likely differ from the anticipated results, performance or achievements that are expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, and such difference might be significant and harmful to our stockholders’ interest. Many important factors that could cause such a difference are described under the caption “Risk Factors,” in Item 1A of this annual report, which you should review carefully.

MANAGEMENTSMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION

We are a recognized leader in the design, manufacture, and installation of laboratory and technical furniture products. Laboratory furniture products include both steel and wood cabinetry, fume hoods, flexible systems, and worksurfaces. Technical furniture products include workstations, workbenches, computer enclosures, and network storage systems. Our headquarters and manufacturing facilities are located in Statesville, North Carolina. We also have subsidiaries in Singapore and Bangalore, India that serve the Asian and Middle East markets. Although only approximately 15.1%18.2% of our sales were through our international subsidiaries in fiscal year 2006,2007 these sales are considered an important part of our long-term growth strategy.

Our products are primarily sold through purchase orders and contracts submitted by customers through our dealers and commissioned agents, a national distributor, and through competitive bids submitted by us and our subsidiaries. Products are sold principally to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, industrial, chemical and commercial research laboratories, educational institutions, healthcare institutions, governmental entities, manufacturing facilities, and users of networking furniture. We consider the markets in which we compete to be highly-competitive,highly competitive, with a significant amount of the business involving competitive public bidding.

It is common in the laboratory furniture industry for customer orders to require delivery at extended future dates, as products are frequently to be installed in buildings yet to be constructed. Changes or delays in building construction may cause delays in delivery of the orders and our recognition of the sale. Since prices are normally quoted on a firm basis in the industry, we bear the burden of possible increases in labor and material costs between receipt of an order and delivery of the product. The impact of such possible increases is considered when determining the sales price. The principal raw materials and products manufactured by others used in our products are cold-rolled carbon and stainless steel, hardwood lumbers and plywood, paint, chemicals, resins, hardware, plumbing and electrical fittings. Such materials and products are purchased from multiple suppliers and are typically readily available.

10

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. We believe that the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require management’s most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

A portion of our product sales result from fixed-price construction contracts that involve a signed contract for a fixed price to provide our laboratory furniture and fume hoods for a construction project. We are usually in the role asof a subcontractor, but in some cases may enter into a contract directly with the end-user of the products. Product sales resulting from fixed-price construction contracts are generated from multiple-element arrangements that require separate units of accounting and estimates regarding the fair value of individual elements. Our multiple-element arrangements that qualify as separate units of accounting are: product sales and installation services. Each of these elements represent individual units of accounting as the delivered item has value to a customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for undelivered items, and arrangements normally do not contain a general right of return relative to the delivered item. We determine fair value based on the price of the deliverable when it is sold separately or based on third-party evidence. In accordance with the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-21 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”,Deliverables,” we use the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration when the arrangement does not indicate fair value of the product sale. Under the residual method, the amount of consideration allocated to the delivered item equals the total arrangement consideration less the aggregate fair value of the undelivered items. Assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met, we recognize revenue for product sales at the date of shipment. Product sales resulting from purchase orders involve a purchase order received by us from our dealers or our stocking distributor. This category includes product sales for standard products, as well as products which require some customization. These sales are recognized under the terms of the purchase order which generally are freight on board (“FOB”) shipping point and do not include rights of return. Accordingly, sales are recognized at the time of shipment.

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

Evaluation of the allowance for doubtful accounts involves management judgments and estimates. We evaluate the collectibility of our trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors. In circumstances where management is aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, or a project dispute makes it unlikely that all of the receivable owed by a customer will be collected, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded, to reduce the recognized receivable to the estimated amount we believe will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, a general reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded based on our recent past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable amounts outstanding.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The cost of the majority of inventories is measured on the last in, first out (“LIFO”) method. The LIFO method allocates the most recent costs to cost of products sold, and, therefore, recognizes into operating results fluctuations in raw materials,

11

and other inventoriable costs more quickly than other methods. Other inventories consisted of foreign inventories and are measured at actual cost.

PENSION BENEFITS

We sponsor pension plans covering all employees who meetmet eligibility requirements.requirements as of April 30, 2005. In February 2005, our pension plans were amended as of April 30, 2005. No further benefits have been, or will be, earned under the plans subsequent to the amendment date, and no additional participants have been, or will be, added to the plans. Several statistical and other factors, which attempt to anticipate future events, are used in calculating the expense and liability related to the pension plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate used to calculate and determine benefit obligations and expected return on plan assets within certain guidelines. The actuarial assumptions used by us may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may significantly affect the amount of pension income or expense recorded by us in future periods.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Sales for fiscal year 2007 were $81.4 million, a decrease of 3% from fiscal year 2006 sales of $84.1 million. Domestic operations sales for the year were $66.6 million, a decrease of 8% from the prior year. As reflected in the growth of our order backlog, the domestic marketplace for laboratory products continued to be healthy during the year, particularly for larger laboratory products. However, the marketplace for small and mid-sized projects remained subdued and very price competitive. International operations sales for the year were $14.8 million, an increase of 23% over the prior year. International

operations sales for the year benefited from a strengthening of our sales representation in the Asian and Middle East markets and a further expansion of our manufacturing capabilities in India.

Our order backlog was $51.2 million at April 30, 2007, as compared to $36.4 million at April 30, 2006, and $40.6 million at April 30, 2005. The increase in order backlog in fiscal year 2007 was due to the strong volume of incoming orders, both domestic and international, in the second half of the year.

Sales for fiscal year 2006 were $84.1 million, an increase of 14.4%14% from fiscal year 2005 sales of $73.4 million. Domestic demandoperations sales for our products improved during the year. Domestic salesyear were $72.0 million, an increase of 6.2%6% over the prior year. Although demand for products improved, a significant amount of excess manufacturing capacity remained in the marketplace. Domestic selling prices for laboratory products declined during thefiscal year 2006, as manufacturers reacted to the excess manufacturing capacity. Growth accelerated for our Asian subsidiaries duringcapacity in the year, asmarketplace. International operations sales through our international subsidiaries increased 113% to $12.0 million.

Sales for fiscal year 20052006 were $73.4$12.0 million, a decreasean increase of 22% from fiscal year 2004 sales of $94.7 million. Domestic sales were $67.1 million, a decrease of 24% from113% over the prior year, while sales through our international sales decreased 8% to $6.9 million. Sales for fiscal year 2005, both domestic and international, were adversely affected by several factors during the year. Spending for new research projects by pharmaceutical companies was reduced by the uncertainties surrounding the November 2004 presidential election and the potential impact of its outcome on pricing of prescription drugs. The significant increases in the cost of construction materials during fiscal year 2005 reduced the number of laboratory projects generally available in the marketplace, or delayed construction. Spending for laboratory construction for higher education science buildings slowed significantly during fiscal year 2005 due to the combination of significantly higher construction costs and reduced state funds available for these projects. Our order backlog was $36.4 million at April 30, 2006, as compared to $40.6 million at April 30, 2005, and $43.1 million at April 30, 2004.

Gross profit represented 14.8%18.5%, 17.0%14.8%, and 16.6%17.0% of sales in fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The increase in the gross profit margin in fiscal year 2007 from fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to improved manufacturing costs, continuing success in identifying new lower cost global supply sources for raw materials and 2004, respectively.components, and other cost improvement activities. The decrease in gross profit margin in fiscal year 2006 from fiscal year 2005 was due to a number of unfavorable factors. These included lower selling prices, increased costs of raw materials, particularly steel and epoxy resin, and increased costs of energy and transportation. We only had limited success in our efforts to pass on these added costs to customers. The unfavorable factors were partially offset by actions taken to reduce factory overhead, manufacturing costs, and material costs.

The increase in gross profit margin in fiscal year 2005 from fiscal year 2004 was due to aggressive activities to reduce overhead and material costs. These improvements more than offset significant increases in raw material prices, particularly steel and epoxy resin, which reduced gross profit for the year by $1.4 million, or 1.9% of sales.

Other operating income of $884,000 in fiscal year 2006 resulted from the sale of our former plant site in Lockhart, Texas.

12

Operating expenses were $11.7 million, $12.2 million, $12.7 million, and $13.5$12.7 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004,2005, respectively, and 14.5%14.4%, 17.3%14.5%, and 14.2%17.3% of sales, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses for fiscal year 2007 as compared to fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to a reduction in sales and marketing expenses of $368,000 and a decline of $182,000 in sales commission due to lower sales. The decrease in operating expenses for fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005 was primarily attributable to cost reduction activities during the currentfiscal year 2006, the full benefit of workforce reductions made during the prior year, a decrease in pension expense of $251,000 resulting from the freezing of benefits in our pension plans as of April 30, 2005, and a reduction in bad debt expense of $232,000.

On a dollar basis, operating expenses for fiscal year 2005 as compared to fiscal year 2004 benefited from cost reduction activities, including reduced salaries and benefits of $630,000 resulting from workforce reductions made during the year. Operating expenses in fiscal year 2005 also benefited from a decline in sales commissions of $461,000 as compared to the prior year due to the lower sales volumes. As a percent of sales, operating expenses in fiscal year 2005 increased as compared to fiscal year 2004 as the amount of operating expenses did not decline proportionately with the decline in sales.

Other income was $53,000, $50,000, $2,000, and $319,000$2,000 in fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, and 2004, respectively. Other income for fiscal year 2004 includes $295,000 received during the year from the resolution of a disputed claim for laboratory furniture sold several years earlier.

Interest expense was $670,000, $470,000, $310,000, and $301,000$310,000 in fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The increased interest expense in fiscal year 2007 resulted primarily from higher interest rates paid and 2004, respectively.higher levels of bank borrowings and capital leases during the year. The increased interest expense in fiscal year 2006 resulted primarily from higher interest rates paid. The increased interest

Income tax expense of $902,000, or 32.9% of pretax earnings, was recorded in fiscal year 2005 resulted2007. The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2007 differs from higher interestthe statutory rate as it was increased by the impact of differing foreign tax rates paid, partially offsetand was decreased by lower levelsthe impact of borrowings.state and federal tax credits.

Income tax expense of $288,000, or 41.3% of pretax earnings, was recorded in fiscal year 2006. The impact of earned state and federal tax credits in fiscal year 2006 was offset by a valuation allowance established against earned but unused tax credits, since the utilization of these tax credits depends on future taxable income.credits. An income tax benefit of $488,000, or 93.3% of the pretax loss, was recorded in fiscal year 2005. An income tax expense of $621,000, or 28.0% of pretax earnings was recorded in fiscal year 2004. The effective rate for fiscal yearsyear 2005 and 2004 differs from the statutory rate due to the impact of earned state and federal tax credits. The effective rate for fiscal year 2005 was also impacted by the level of the pretax losses.

Minority interest related to our two subsidiaries that are not 100% owned by us were $299,000, $216,000, $112,000, and $133,000,$112,000, for fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004,2005, respectively. The changes in minority interest for each year were due to changes in the net income of the subsidiaries.

Net earnings in fiscal year 2007 were $1,540,000, or $0.62 per diluted share. Net earnings in fiscal year 2006 were $193,000, or $0.08 per diluted share. Net earnings in fiscal year 2006 included a gain of $540,000 resulting from the sale of our former plant site in Lockhart, Texas. A net loss of $147,000, or $0.06 per diluted share, was reported for fiscal year 2005. Net earnings in fiscal year 2004 were $1.5 million, or $0.59 per diluted share. Net earnings in fiscal year 2006 were increased by $540,000, resulting from the sale of our former plant site in Lockhart, Texas.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal sources of liquidity have historically been funds generated from operating activities, supplemented as needed by borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Additionally, certain machinery and equipment are financed by non-cancelable operating leases or capital leases. We believe that these sources of funds will be sufficient to support ongoing business requirements, including capital expenditures, through fiscal year 2007.2008.

At April 30, 2006,2007, we had advances of $8.2$3.5 million outstanding under an unsecured $9$12 million revolving credit facility. The credit facility matures in December 2006,2007, and we intend to extend or replace it with a new facility prior to the maturity date.date, although there can be no assurance as to the availability or terms of any such extension or replacement.

13

During fiscal year 2003, we entered into a 10-year operating lease for a new distribution center in Statesville, North Carolina. This lease arrangement, as well as most of our leases for machinery and equipment, provides us with renewal and purchase options and certain early cancellation rights.

In fiscal year 2005, we began a project to purchase and install a new enterprise resource planning system (ERP). system. The project is projected to have a total cost of $2.0$3.1 million and is expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007.2008. We have entered into lease arrangements to fund the majority of the expectedexternal costs of the project as costs are incurred. Costs of $300,000, $852,000 and $715,000 for the project were incurred and funded under operating and capital lease arrangements during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The following table summarizes the obligated cash payments including interest, if applicable, for the above commitments as of April 30, 2006:2007:

PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD

($ in thousands)

We do not have any off balance sheet obligations at April 30, 2006.2007.

Operating activities provided cash of $8.7 million in fiscal year 2007, primarily from operating earnings, a reduction in accounts receivable, and an increase in deferred revenue. Operating activities used cash of $246,000 in fiscal year 2006. Operating activities2006 and provided cash of $3.1 million in fiscal year 2005 and used cash of $943,000 in fiscal year and 2004.2005. The primary uses of cash during fiscal year 2006 were increases in inventory and accounts receivable balances, partially offset by cash provided from operating earnings and an increase in accounts payable. Operations, along with a reduction in accounts receivable, and inventory were the primary sources of cash in fiscal year 2005. The primary use of cash in fiscal year 2004 was to fund the significant increase in receivables, which was partially offset by funds provided from operating earnings and a reduction in inventory. The majority of the April 30, 20062007 accounts receivable balances are expected to be collected during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007,2008, with the exception of retention amounts on fixed-price contracts which are collected when the entire construction project is completed and all retention funds are paid by the owner.

We made cash contributions of $2.5 million and $750,000 to our pension plans in fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively. As discussed above, no further benefits have been, or will be, earned under theour pension plans after April 30, 2005, and no additional participants have been, or will be, added to the plans. We did not make any contributions to the plans in fiscal yearyears 2007 and 2006, and do not expect to make any contributions to the plans in fiscal year 2007.2008.

Capital expenditures were $1.7 million, $1.9 million, $1.0 million, and $1.6$1.0 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, and 2004, respectively. Capital expenditures in fiscal year 2007 were funded primarily from cash generated by operating activities. Capital expenditures in fiscal year 2006 were funded primarily from cash generated by the sale of our property in Lockhart, Texas. Capital assets related to the ERP system in the amount of $580,000 were funded under capital leases in fiscal year 2006. Capital expenditures in fiscal year 2005 were funded primarily from cash generated by operating activities. Capital assets related to the ERP system in the amountamounts of $300,000, $580,000, and $440,000 were funded under capital leases in fiscal year 2005. Capital expenditures in fiscal year 2004 were funded primarily from borrowings under our credit facility.years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Fiscal year 20072008 capital expenditures are anticipated to be approximately $1.0 million and are expected to be funded primarily by cash from operating activities.

14

Working capital increased to $12.3 million at April 30, 2007, from $11.0 million at April 30, 2006, from $10.4 million at April 30, 2005, and the ratio of current assets to current liabilities decreasedincreased to 1.8-to-1 at April 30, 2007, from 1.5-to-1 at April 30, 2006, from 1.6-to-1 at April 30, 2005.2006. The increase in working capital for fiscal year 20062007 was attributeddue to increases in cash and cash equivalents.

We paid cash dividends of $0.28 per share for each of the fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004.2005. We expect to pay dividends in the future in line with our actual and anticipated future operating results.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Adoption of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 In September 2006, the SEC staff released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 was issued in order to eliminate the diversity of practice surrounding how public companies quantify financial statement misstatements. Traditionally, there have been two widely-recognized methods of quantifying the effects of financial statement misstatements: the “roll-over” method and the “iron curtain” method. The roll-over method focuses primarily on the impact of a misstatement on the income statement, including the reversing effect of prior year misstatements, but its use can lead to the accumulation of misstatements in the balance sheet. The iron curtain method focuses primarily on the effect of correcting the period-end balance sheet with less emphasis on the reversing effects of prior year errors on the income statement.

In SAB 108, the SEC staff established an approach that required quantification of financial statement misstatements based on the effect of the misstatements on each of a company’s financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. This model is commonly referred to as a “dual approach” because it requires quantification of errors under both the iron curtain and the roll-over methods.

SAB 108 permits public companies to initially apply its provisions either by (i) restating prior financial statements as if the “dual approach” had always been used or (ii) recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the “dual approach” as adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of May 2005,1, 2006 with an offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings.

During fiscal years 1998 through 2006 the Company overstated deferred income tax assets by a cumulative total amount of $421,000. Subsequent to the years in which the overstatements occurred, the Company discovered the errors and determined they were not material to the Company’s financial statements for the years in which they occurred. The Company elected to apply SAB 108 to correct the errors using the cumulative effect transition method.

The following table summarizes the effects on the related account balances of applying the guidance in SAB 108 as of May 1, 2006:

New Accounting StandardsIn June 2006, the FASB issued SFASInterpretation No. 154,48, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 replaces APB No. 20, “Accounting Changes”, and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changesfor Uncertainty in Interim Financial Statements”, and established retrospective applicationIncome Taxes” (“FIN 48” or the “Interpretation”) which defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of a changetax return positions in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issuedthe financial statements is also addressed. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005. Weas “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. “Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as used in the title of the new Interpretation, refers to uncertainty about how some transactions will adopt SFAS No. 154be treated under the tax law. This uncertainty leads to questions about whether tax positions taken or to be taken on tax returns should be reflected in fiscal year 2007 and believe that it will not have a material impact on ourthe financial conditionstatements before they are finally resolved with the taxing authorities. FIN 48 applies to all tax

positions, regardless of their level of uncertainty or resultsthe nature of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, and requires all companies to estimateposition. However, the fair value of incentive stock options granted and then amortize that estimated fair value to expense over the options vesting period. We currently account for our stock option plans under theInterpretation’s recognition and measurement principlesrequirements are likely to have the most impact on positions for which current or future deductions may be disallowed or reduced in a tax examination. The Interpretation applies to situations where the uncertainty is about the timing of APB Opinion No. 25. No employeethe deduction, the amount of the deduction, or outside director compensation costs related to stock option grants are currently reflected in net income, as all option awards granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value onvalidity of the date of grant. SFAS No. 123(R)deduction. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after JuneDecember 15, 2005. We2006, and the Company will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) inthis Interpretation during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 and believe that it will2008. The Company has not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2004,yet determined the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” This statement addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and redefines the scope of transactions that should be measured based on fair value of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS No. 153 in fiscal year 2007 and believe that it will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and FSP 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the ACT).” These FSPs provides accounting and disclosure guidelines relative to the income tax deductions and repatriation provisions contained in the ACT. These FSPs were effective upon issuance. We have not determined what impact,effect, if any, that the ACT and these FSPs mayadoption of FIN 48 will have on ourits consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In November 2004,September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an Amendment157, “Fair Value Measurement” (“SFAS 157”), which establishes a single authoritative definition of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.”fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements in both annual and interim reports. SFAS No. 151 seeks157 applies only to clarifyfair-value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the accountingconsistency of those measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material in the determination of inventory carrying costs. This statement requires such costs to be treated as a current period expense. SFAS No. 151 is effectivefair-value measures already required or permitted by other standards for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after JuneNovember 15, 2005. We2007 and will adopt SFAS No. 151be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2007 and believe2009. The Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that itthe adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on ourits consolidated financial conditionposition or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”), which requires employers to recognize on their balance sheets the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans. SFAS 158 also requires companies to recognize actuarial gains and losses, prior service cost, and any remaining transition amounts from the initial application of Statements 87 and 106 when recognizing a plan’s funded status, with the offset to accumulated other comprehensive income. The provisions of SFAS 158 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006 and the Company has adopted this standard effective April 30, 2007. Adoption of this standard resulted in a $3.4 million decrease in other Non-Current Assets, a $2.1 million decrease in Other Comprehensive Income, a $1.1 million decrease in Deferred Tax Liabilities, and a $129,000 increase in Deferred Tax Assets.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “the Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), which allows measurement of specified financial instruments, warranty and insurance contracts at fair value on a contract by contract basis, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in each period. SFAS 159 is effective at the beginning of the fiscal year that begins after November 15,

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 404 REQUIREMENTS

On May 17, 2006, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission further extended the compliance dates for non-accelerated filers to include in their annual reports a report by management on our internal control over financial reporting and an accompanying auditor’s report. As such,a result, we must comply with this requirement for our year ending April 30, 2008.

OUTLOOK

OurWhile our ability to predict future demand for our products is verycontinues to be limited given, among other general economic factors affecting the Company and our markets, ourthe Company’s role as subcontractor or supplier to dealers of subcontractors.for subcontractors, we expect fiscal year 2008 to be profitable. In addition to thesegeneral economic factors affecting the Company and our markets, demand for our products is also dependent upon the number of laboratory construction projects planned and/or current progress in projects already under constructionconstruction. Our earnings are also impacted by increased costs of raw materials, including stainless steel, wood, and our successepoxy resin, and whether we are able to increase product prices to customers in the competitive public bidding process for many of our contracts.amounts that correspond to such increases without materially and adversely affecting sales.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk in the area of interest rates. This exposure is associated with amounts outstanding under our bank note, certain lease obligations for production machinery, and advances under our revolving credit loan, all of which are priced on a floating rate basis. The principal balance under the revolving credit loan was $8.2$3.5 million at April 30, 2006.2007. We believe that this exposure to market risk is not material.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Consolidated Financial Statements

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

16

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT OFON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

To the Stockholders and Board of DirectorsTO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

of Kewaunee Scientific CorporationOF KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes were prepared by management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. Management believes the financial statements, which include amounts based on judgments and estimates, fairly reflect the Company’s financial position and operating results, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. All financial information in this report is consistent with the financial statements.

Management maintains internal accounting control systems and related policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, that transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization, and that accounting records may be relied upon for the preparation of financial statements and other financial information. The design, monitoring, and revision of internal accounting control systems involve, among other things, management’s judgment with respect to the relative costs and expected benefits of specific control measures. The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been audited by independent accountants who have expressed their opinion with respect to the fairness of those statements. Their audits included consideration of the Company’s internal accounting control systems over financial reporting and related policies and procedures.procedures as basis for designing appropriate audit procedures, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. They advise management and the Audit Committee of significant matters resulting from their audits.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of directors who are not officers or employees of the Company, selects the independent accountants for the annual audit of the consolidated financial statements and meets with management and the independent accountants to discuss the scope and findings of audits and financial reportedreporting and internal control matters.

D. Michael Parker

Senior Vice President, Finance

Chief Financial Officer

June 26, 2006

17July 12, 2007

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To The Stockholders and Board ofTO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Directors of Kewaunee Scientific CorporationOF KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, and subsidiaries (the Company) as of April 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearyears then ended. Our auditaudits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and the schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the schedule based on our audit.audits.

We conducted our auditaudits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and its subsidiaries at April 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the yearyears ended April 30, 2007 and 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financials statements, the Company: (1) effective April 30, 2007, began to recognize the funded status of its benefit plan in its consolidated balance sheet to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), and (2) effective April 30, 2007, the Company adopted the dual method of evaluating errors, as required by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.”

CHERRY, BEKAERT & HOLLAND, L.L.P.

Charlotte, North Carolina

June 26, 2006

18July 12, 2007

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board ofTO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Directors of Kewaunee Scientific CorporationOF KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and its subsidiaries at April 30, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended April 30, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the year ended April 30, 2005 listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERSPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina

June 15, 2005

19

KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended April 30

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

20

KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

21

KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

22

KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS