UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20062009

OR

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number 1-31234

WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’sRegistrant's telephone number, including area code: (214) 756-6900

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None

Indicate by check mark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes¨No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes¨No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  ¨No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated filer and large“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨    Accelerated filerx    Non-accelerated filer¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value on June 30, 20062009 of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $90,274,630.$235,650,000. For purposes of this calculation, the registrant has assumed that stockholders that are not officers or directors of the registrant are not affiliates of the registrant.

The number of shares of registrant’sregistrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of February 20, 2007: 6,638,525.22, 2010: 7,151,472.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Selected portions of the registrant’sregistrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the 20072010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.

Index

i

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “we,” “us,” “our,” “Westwood,” or “Westwood Holdings Group” when used in this Form 10-K (“Report”) and in the Annual Report to the Stockholders refers to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors taken as a whole. This Report contains some forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Actual results and the timing of some events could differ materially from those projected in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including without limitation those set forth under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.

General

We manage investment assets and provide services for our clients through our two subsidiaries, Westwood Management Corp. (“Westwood Management”) and Westwood Trust. Westwood Management provides investment advisory services to corporate pension funds,retirement plans, public retirement plans, endowments and foundations, a family of institutional mutual funds, which we call the WHG Funds, other mutual funds and clients of Westwood Trust. Westwood Trust provides trust and custodial services and participation in common trust funds that it sponsors to institutions and high net worth individuals. Our revenues are generally derived from fees based on a percentage of assets under management, and at December 31, 2006,2009, Westwood Management and Westwood Trust collectively managed assets valued at approximately $5.9$10.2 billion. We have been providing investment advisory services since 1983 and, according to recognized industry sources, including Morningstar, Inc., when measured over multi-year periods of ten years and longer, our principal asset classes rank at or above the median in performance within their peer groups.

The core of our business is dependent on our client relationships. We believe that, in addition to investment performance, client service is paramount in the asset management business. As such, a major focus of our business strategy is to continue building strong relationships with clients to better enable us to anticipate their needs and to satisfy their investment objectives. Our team approach is designed to result in efficient, responsive service for our clients. Our future success is dependent to a significant degree on both investment performance and our ability to provide responsiveattentive client service.

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on December 12, 2001 as a subsidiary of SWS Group, Inc. (“SWS”). On June 28, 2002, SWS completed the spin-off of us by effecting a dividend distribution of all of our common stock held by SWS to all of its stockholders on a pro rata basis.2001. We are an independent public company, and our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “WHG.” We are a holding company, and our principal assets consist of the capital stock of Westwood Management and Westwood Trust.

One of the priorities on which we have focused since 2002 is building a foundation in terms of personnel and infrastructure to support a potentially much larger business. We have also developed products that we believe will be desirable within our target institutional and private client markets. The cost of developing new products and the organization as a whole can result in our incurring expenses before material offsetting revenue is realized. We believe that the foundation and products are now in place and have been taking these products to the institutional marketplace in recent years. We have seen a high level of interest from institutional investors in these products, which we hope will generate new revenue streams.

Available Information

We maintain a website at www.westwoodgroup.com. Information foundcontained on, or connected to, our website is not intended toincorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be aconsidered part of this Report.report or any other filing that we make with the SEC. All filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available withoutfree of charge on our website. Additionally, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Audit Committee, Charter, our Compensation Committee Charter and our Governance/Nominating Committee CharterCharters are available without charge on our website. Stockholders also may obtain print copies of these documents free of charge by submitting a written request to William R. Hardcastle, Jr. at the address set forth in the front of this Report. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. that file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any document we file with the SEC atwww.sec.gov.

Westwood Management

General

Westwood Management provides investment advisory services to large institutions, including corporate pension funds,retirement plans, public retirement plans, endowments and foundations, having at least $10 – $25 million in investable assets, depending on the asset class. Westwood Management also provides advisory services to the WHG Funds and subadvisory services to other mutual funds. Our overall investment philosophy is determined by a team of professionals including our chief investment officer, Susan M. Byrne, and, with respect to the bulk of assets under management, isconsists of a value-oriented approach that is focused on achieving a superior, risk-adjusted return by investing in companies that aregenerating high levels of free cash flow with strong balance sheets and positioned for growth but are not fully recognized as such in the marketplace. This investment approach is designed to preserve capital induring unfavorable periods and to provide superior real returns over the long term. Ms. Byrne has over 30 years of investment experience. Westwood Management’s investment advisory team also possesses substantial investment management experience, includingconsists of a number of investment management, research and trading professionals.professionals with substantial investment management experience. The continuity of the team and its years of experience are critical elements in successfully managing investments.

Managed Asset Classes

Asset Management. We provide clients withoffer a broad range of investment asset classes designedallowing us to meetserve various types of clients and varying investment objectives. This affords our clients the opportunity to meet their investment objectives through the use of one investment adviser. More than half of our assets under management are invested in our LargeCap Value asset class. The following sets forth the principal asset classes currently managed by Westwood Management:

LargeCap Value: Investments in equity securities of approximately 45-60 well-seasoned companies with market capitalizations generally over $1$5 billion. Our strategy for thisThis portfolio is to investinvested in companies where we expect that future profitability, driven by operational improvements, will be higher than expectations reflected in current share prices. The median market capitalization of our LargeCap Value portfolio was $31.8 billion as of December 31, 2009.

MidCap Value:Investments in equity securities of approximately 50-70 companies with market capitalizations between $4 billion and $20 billion. Similar to the LargeCap Value asset class, we seek to discover operational improvements that are driving earnings growth within small to mid-size companies that can be purchased inexpensively.

SMidCap Value: Investments in equity securities of approximately 45-60 companies with market capitalizations between $100 million and $10 billion. Similar to the LargeCap Valueour other value-oriented asset class,classes, we seek to discover the same kinds of operational improvements that are driving earnings growth but within small to mid-size companies that can be purchased inexpensively.

SmallCap Value: Investments in equity securities of approximately 50-70 companies with market capitalizations between $100 million and $2.5 billion. Similar to the LargeCap Value and SMidCap Valueour other value-oriented asset classes, we seek to invest in high quality companies wherewhose earnings growth is driven by operational improvements that are not yet fully recognized by the market.

AllCap Value: Investments in equity securities of approximately 60-80 well-seasoned companies. The portfolio is generally comprised of the best ideas within all market capitalizations above $100 million. Similar to the LargeCap Valueour other value-oriented asset class,classes, we seek to invest in companies across a broad range of market capitalizations where we expect that future profitability, driven by operational improvements, will be higher than expectations currently reflected in share prices.

LargeCap Enhanced: Investments in equity securities of approximately 75-100 long and 20-30 short, well-seasoned companies with market capitalizations above $3 billion. Using fundamental research with a quantitative screening overlay, this portfolio is invested in companies where we expect that future profitability, driven by operational improvements, will be higher than expectations reflected in current share prices across a broad range of market capitalizations.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (or REITs): Investmentsand also shorts companies where we expect that future profitability is below what is reflected in the publicly traded equity securities of approximately 50 real estate investment trusts. Our investment process involves making investment selections based on qualitative research of high quality REITs.current share prices.

Balanced: Investments in a combination of equity and fixed income securities, which are designed to provide both growth opportunities and income, while also placing emphasis uponemphasizing asset preservation in “down” markets. Westwood Management applies its expertise in dynamic asset allocation and security selection decisions in carrying out this balanced strategy approach.

Income Opportunity: Investments in dividend-paying common stocks, straight and convertible preferred stock, master limited partnerships, REITs and selected debt instruments. The portfolioThis portfolio’s strategy focuses on companies with strong and improving cash flow sufficient to support a sustainable or rising income stream for investors. This asset class is targeted towards investors seeking high current income through dividend-paying and/or interest-bearing securities.

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs): Investments include MLPs (including limited partnerships, “LPs,” and general partnerships, “GPs”), securities of tanker and other marine shipping companies and other securities whose characteristics are consistent with those listed above. The portfolio focuses on companies that, over time, exhibit higher dividend yields, stable and predictable cash flows, low correlations to other asset classes, and growth opportunities.

Core/Intermediate Fixed Income Core/Intermediate Bonds: Investments in high-grade, intermediate term corporate and government bonds. We seek to add value to client portfolios through yield curve positioning and investmentinvesting in debt instruments with improving credit quality.quality potential.

Each asset class isconsists of a portfolio of equity and/or fixed income securities selected by Westwood Management’s portfolio teams and chosen to best provide the long term returns consistent with Westwood Management’s investment philosophy. Our portfolio teams make decisions for all of Westwood Management’s asset classes in accordance with the investment objectives and policies of such asset classes, including determining when and which securities to purchase and sell.

We primarily employ a value-oriented approach in managing the bulk of our equity asset classes. The common thread that permeates throughout our investment strategies is our focus on a disciplined approach to controlling risk and, whenever possible, preserving the core value of the assets under management whenever possible.our clients’ assets. Our value orientedvalue-oriented asset classes haveplace a greater emphasis on identifying companies where earnings result from actual operational improvements and not manufacturedrather than from improvements occurring throughderived from financial statement adjustments. Our desire to prevent the loss of the core value of theclient assets under management is the overriding objective of this strategy, even ifat the cost is the loss of opportunity for potentially higher returns. Whether throughThrough investments in industry leaders or in companies that provide steady and stable growth,exhibit these characteristics, Westwood Management seeks to demonstrate consistently demonstrate superior performance relative to our industry peers and the broad market.relevant benchmark indices.

More than two-thirdshalf of our assets under management are invested in equity securities of companies with a large market capitalization.capitalizations. When measured over multi-year periods, ten years and longer, Westwood Management’s principal asset classes rankhave consistently ranked above the median within their peer groups ingroup performance rankings according to recognized industry sources, including Morningstar, Inc. For the ten-year period ended on December 31, 2006, our LargeCap Value and Balanced asset classes rank in the top quartile in their peer groups.

Our ability to grow our assets under management is primarily dependent on our competitive long-term performance record, and ourbuilding strong relationships with investment consulting firms throughout the nation.nationwide as well as our ability to develop new client relationships. We are continually lookinglook for opportunities to expand our asset classes in terms ofassets under management by growing our existing asset classes and developing new portfolios focusing on investment areas that are not currently part of our current asset classes under management. We primarily intend to grow our asset classes internally but may also consider acquiring new asset classes from third parties, as discussed under “—Growth Strategy” below. Our growth strategy not only provides our clients with more investment opportunities but alsoand diversifies our assets under management, thereby reducing our risk in any one area of investment and increasing our competitive ability to attract new clients.

Cash Management. Westwood Management also provides cash management and custodial services for the cash reserve funds of SWS. The SWS cash reserve funds totaled $172 million at December 31, 2006.

Advisory and Subadvisory Service Agreements

Westwood Management manages client accounts of its clients under investment advisory and subadvisory agreements. As is common inTypical within the asset management industry, thesesuch agreements are usually terminable upon short notice and provide for compensation based on the market value of the client’s assets under management. Westwood Management’s advisory fees are paid quarterly in advance based on the assets under management on the last day of the preceding quarter, quarterly in arrears based on the assets under management on the last day of the previous quarter, just ended, or are based on a daily or monthly analysis of assets under management for the stated period. A limited number of our clients have a performance-based fee component in their contract, which generates additional revenues if we outperform a specified index over a specific period of time. We record revenue for performance-based fees at the end of the measurement period. Revenue from advance payments is deferred and recognized over the period that services are performed. Pursuant to these agreements, Westwood Management provides overall investment management services, including directing investments in conformity with the investment objectives and restrictions imposedestablished by the clients. Unless otherwise directed in writing by our client, Westwood Management has the authority to vote all proxies with respect to a client’sclient assets.

Westwood Management is also a party to subadvisory agreements with other investment advisors under which it performs substantially the same services as it does under its advisory agreements. However, the investment strategy adopted for a particular client is subject to supervision and review by the client. Our subadvisory fees are computed based upon the daily net assets of the client and are payable on a monthly basis. As with our advisory agreements, these agreements are terminable upon short notice.

Under our subadvisory agreement with Teton Advisors, Inc. (formerly Gabelli Advisers, Inc.), Westwood Management provides investment advisory services to the GAMCO Westwood Funds family of mutual funds. The Westwood Equity Fund is a large cap value fund with assets consisting of securities valued at approximately $187 million as of December 31, 2006. For the ten-year period ended on December 31, 2006, the Westwood Equity Fund ranked in the 27^th percentile in the Large Value category according to Morningstar, Inc. Westwood Management owns shares of Class A Common Stock representing a 19.02%15.3% economic interest in Gabelli Advisers,Teton Advisors, Inc., a subsidiaryan affiliate of GAMCO Investors, Inc. Based on SEC filings, we believe that GAMCO Investors, Inc. owned 19.0%13.2% of our common stock as of December 31, 2006.2009. Westwood Management received subadvisory payments from Teton Advisors, Inc. of $863,000, $780,000$617,000, $784,000 and $889,000$844,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.

While Westwood Management provides subadvisory services with respect to the Westwood Funds family of funds, Westwood Management provides investment advisory services directly to the WHG Funds family of mutual funds, namelywhich includes the WHG SMidCap Fund, the WHG Income Opportunity Fund, the WHG LargeCap Value Fund, the WHG Balanced Fund and the WHG BalancedSmallCap Value Fund. “WHG Funds” represent the family of institutional mutual funds for which Westwood Management serves as advisor. “Westwood Funds” represent the family of mutual funds for which Westwood Management serves as subadvisor.

One of our largest clients in terms of assets paid us both asset-based and performance-based advisory fees two of the last three years. Due to a significant performance fee earned in 2008, this client accounted for 19.5% of our fee revenues in 2008; however, this client did not pay us a performance fee in 2009 and accounted for less than 1% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our four largest clients accounted for approximately 25.6%13.1% of totalfee revenues for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2006.2009. The loss of some or all of these large clients or the failure to achieve superior investment performance necessary to earn a performance fee could have a material adverse affect on our business and our results of operations.

Westwood Trust

General

Westwood Trust provides trust and custodial services and participation in common trust funds that it sponsors to institutions and high net worth individuals generally having at least $1 million in assets under management. Westwood Trust seeks to define and improve the risk/return profile of the client’s investment portfolio by complementing or enhancing existing investment strategies. Westwood Trust also provides back office services to its clients, including tax reporting, distribution of income to beneficiaries, preparation of trust and account statements and attending to the special needs of particular trusts, as well asand also serves as trustee for tax and estate-planning purposes and for special needs trusts. Westwood Trust is chartered and regulated by the Texas Department of Banking.

Westwood Trust primarily provides services for employee benefit trusts and personal trusts. Employee benefit trusts include retirement plans of businesses to benefit their employees, such as defined contribution plans, pensions and profit sharing plans. Westwood Trust may also be appointed as a trustee and may provide administrative support for these plans, as well as investment advisory and custodial services. Personal trusts are developed to achieve a number of different objectives, and Westwood Trust acts as trustee to these trusts and assists them in developing tax efficienttax-efficient trust portfolios for them.portfolios. The fees charged by Westwood Trust are separately negotiated with each client and are based on the complexity of the operations of the trust and the amount of assets under management.

Services

Westwood Trust undertakes a fiduciary responsibility toward the management of each client’s assets and utilizes a consultative asset allocation approach. This approach involves Westwood Trust examining the client’s financial situation, including the client’s current portfolio of investments, and advising the client on ways in which it can enhance its investment returns and financial position. Westwood Trust also provides custodial services, safekeeping and accounting services.

Common Trust Funds

Westwood Trust sponsors a number of common trust funds in which our clients’ assets are commingled to achieve economies of scale. Westwood Trust’s common trust funds fall within two basic categories: personal trusttrusts and employee benefit trust.trusts. Westwood Trust sponsors common trust funds for most of the asset classes managed by Westwood Management. Westwood Trust also engages third party subadvisors for some of its common trust funds, such as our Growth Equity, International Equity and High Yield Bond common trust funds.

Enhanced Balanced Portfolios

Westwood Trust is a strong proponent of asset class diversification, and offers its clients the ability to diversify among elevenmultiple different asset classes. Westwood Trust Enhanced Balanced ™ portfolios seek to combine these asset classes into a unique customizable portfolio for clients seeking to maximize return for a given level of risk. Periodic adjustments are made to asset class weightings in Enhanced Balanced ™ portfolios based on historical return,returns, risk and correlation data, as well as an analysis of itsour capital markets outlook.

Distribution Channels

We market our services through several distribution channels that allow us to expand the reach of our investment advisory services. These channels provideenable us the ability to leverage the existing distribution infrastructure and capabilities of other financial services firms and intermediaries and focuswhile focusing on our core competency of developing outstanding investment asset classes.

Institutional Investment Consultants

Investment management consulting firms serve as gatekeepers to a large percentage ofmany corporate pensionretirement plans, public retirement plans, endowments and foundations, which represent Westwood’s primary client target markets. Consultants provide guidance and expertiseto their clients in setting a client’s asset allocation strategy, as well as the establishment of ancreating investment policy. In addition, consultantspolicies. Consultants also make recommendations offor investment firms that they believe willcan best meet their client’s investment objectives. We have established strong relationships with many national and regional investment consulting firms, which has resulted in usour being considered and hired by many of their clients. Continuing to enhance our existing consulting firm relationships, as well as forging new relationships, serves to increase the awareness of our services in both the consultant community and thetheir underlying institutional client base.

Subadvisory Relationships

Our subadvisory relationships allow us to extend the reach of our investment management services to the clients of other investment companies that havewith broad, established distribution capabilities. In subadvisory arrangements, our client is typically the investment company through which our services are offered to investors. In these subadvisory arrangements, our investment advisory services are typically made available through retail-based mutual fund offerings. The investment company that sponsors the mutual fund is responsible for marketing, distribution, operations and accounting related to these funds.

Managed Accounts

Managed accounts are similar in some respects to subadvisory relationships in that a third partythird-party financial institution, such as a brokerage firm or turnkey asset management program provider, handles distribution to the end client. The end client in a managed account is typically a high net worth individual or small institution. In these arrangements, the third party financial institution is responsible to the end client for client service, operations and accounting.

Growth Strategy

We believe that we have established a strong platform to support future growth, deriving our strength in large part from the experience and capabilities of our management team and skilled investment professionals. We believe that assembling this focused, stable team has contributed in large part to our solid investment performance, superior client service and a growing array of available asset classes. We believe ourthat opportunities for future growth may come from our ability to:

Generate growth from new and existing clients and consultant relationships. As our primary business objective, we intend to maintain and enhance existing relationships with clients and investment consultants by continuing to provide solid investment performance and a high level of quality customer service to these existing relationships. Additionally, we intend to pursue growth through targeted sales and marketing efforts that emphasize our investment performance and superior client service. New institutional client accounts are generally derived through investment consultants, and we have been successful in developing solid long-term relationships with many national and regional investment consultants. TheWe believe that the familiarity with our firm, our people and our processes that we have built in theseconsultant and client relationships is one of the key factors in being considered for new client investment mandates.

Attract and retain key employees. In order to achieve our performance and client relationship objectives, we must be able to retain and attract talented investment professionals. We believe that we have created a workplace environment in which motivated, performance-driven, and client-oriented individuals thrive. As a public company, we are able to offer to our employees a compensation program that includes strong equity incentives sosuch that the success of our employees will be closely tied to the success of our clients. We believe that these factors are critical ingredients in maintaining a stable, client-focused environment. As a result,environment, and accordingly we have built a firm that we believe can support significant future growth.

Grow assets in our additional asset classes. While LargeCap Value is our flagship product and we believe it has significant capacity for additional assets; however, we continue to develop additional asset classes in response to client needs and the opportunities we see in the marketplace. Westwood Management has managedWe believe these additional asset classes provide opportunities for us to grow our assets under management. For instance, we have achieved meaningful growth in assets in our SMidCap Value product since we began marketing this asset class to institutions in 2004. As a result of this growth, the SMidCap Value asset class with solid results for clients at Westwood Trust for several years. We began marketingwas closed to new institutional assets in 2009. The WHG SMidCap Value to institutions in late 2004 and as of December 31, 2006, we had approximately $880 million under management in that asset class.mutual fund remains open. We have also developed additional new asset classes in recent years that we intend to introduce to the institutional marketplace at the appropriate time in the future. SmallCap Value now has a three-yearsix-year track record, Income Opportunity now has compiled a four-yearseven-year track record and AllCap Value will soon have a five-yearcomplete an eight-year track record. We began marketing SmallCap Value to institutions in 2007 and it has already completed the approval process at many investment consulting firms, earning several institutional mandates. Our AllCap product has been receiving increased interest and was awarded several institutional mandates. In 2007, we launched an MLP portfolio in response to the needs of an existing client. We believe that we have the team in place to fully support these new products in the institutional marketplace. We plan to begin marketing our SmallCap Value asset class to existing clients and institutional investment consultants during 2007. If we continue to deliver strong performance, we believe thethat demand for these asset classes can provide meaningful growth in our assets under management in the future.management.

Foster continued growth of the Westwood Trust platform. Westwood Trust has experienced solid growth in serving small- to medium-sized institutions and high net worth individuals. We are seeing a growing level ofcontinued interest from our clients and prospects in the diversified, highly attentive service model that we have developed. A significant percentage of new asset growth at Westwood Trust stems from referrals and additional assets from existing clients. We believe the continued acceptance of our Enhanced Balanced ™ product, which offers diversified exposure to multiple asset classes in a tax efficient, comprehensive solution for clients, provides us with opportunities for future growth.

Foster expanded distribution via mutual funds. In December 2005, we launched two new mutual funds, theThe WHG Funds consist of WHG SMidCap Fund and the(WHGMX), WHG Income Opportunity Fund, and in 2006, we launched two additional mutual funds, the(WHGIX), WHG LargeCap Value Fund and the(WHGLX), WHG Balanced Fund.(WHGBX) and WHG SmallCap Value (WHGSX), which were launched from 2005 through 2007. The WHG Funds, which mirror our institutional strategies, offer capped expense ratios and are available in an institutional share class.class for all funds. In December 2007 we launched an A share for WHG LargeCap Value and WHG Income Opportunity in order to target No Transaction Fee (“NTF”) mutual fund supermarket platforms and the broker/dealer marketplace. The WHG SMidCap Fund has been awarded a 5-star rating by Morningstar Inc., while WHG LargeCap, WHG Income Opportunity and WHG Balanced each have a 4-star rating. We expect WHG SmallCap Value to be rated by Morningstar Inc. in 2010 after it completes its 3-year track record at the end of the first quarter 2010. In 2009 we reduced the expense cap for WHG Income Opportunity and WHG Balanced in order to increase their appeal to investors. We believe that access to our SMidCap Value, Income Opportunity, LargeCap Value, Balanced and BalancedSmallCap Value asset classes via an institutional mutual fund vehicle will present an attractive offering for certain segments of institutional investors, including 401(k) plans.

Pursue strategic acquisitions and alliances. We will carefully evaluate strategic acquisition, joint venture and alliance opportunities carefully.opportunities. We may in time, haveexpress an interest in pursuing acquisitions of asset management firms, mutual funds, or trust companies that havehaving assets with respect to whichwhere we have expertise or those that appear appropriate as a means of expanding the range of asset classes or services we offer or expanding our distribution capabilities. By acquiring investment firms that successfully manage asset classes in whichbeyond our current expertise we do not specialize, we could increase opportunities to attract new clients and provide our existing clients with aan even more diversified range of asset classes. We may also consider entering into alliances with other financial services firms that wouldto allow us to leverage our core competency of developing superior investment products in combination with alliance partners that could provide us with enhanced distribution capabilities or provide our clients with access to additional service offerings.

Continue strengthening our brand name. We believe that the strength of our brand name has been a key component to our successful long-term tenure in the investment industry and will continue to be instrumental to our future success. We have developed our strong brand name largely through high profile coverage in various investment publications and electronic media. A number of our investment professionals, including Ms. Byrne, and David S. Spika, Investment Strategist, Mark Freeman, Senior Vice President, and Ragen Stienke, Vice President, enjoy a visible presence in print and electronic media, which we believe also enhances our brand name. We will continue to look for creative ways to strengthen our brand name and reputation in our target client markets.

Competition

We are subject to substantial and growing competition in all aspects of our business. Barriers to entry to the asset management business are relatively low, and we believe that we will face a growing number of competitors. Although no one company dominates the asset management industry, many companies are larger, better known and have greater resources than we do.us.

Further, we compete with other asset management firms on the basis of asset classes offered, the investment performance of those asset classes in absolute terms and relative to peer group performance, quality of service, fees charged, the level and type of compensation offered to key employees, and the manner in which asset classes are marketed. Many of our competitors haveoffer more asset classes and services and may also have substantially greater assets under management.

We compete against an ever-increasing number ofnumerous investment dealers, banks, insurance companies and others that sell equity funds, taxable income funds, tax-free investments and other investment products. In addition, the allocation by many investors of assets away from active equity investment to index funds, fixed income or similar asset classes has enhanced the ability of firms offering non-equity asset classes and passive equity management to effectively compete with us.us effectively. In short, the competitive landscape in which we operate is both intense and dynamic, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively in the future as an independent company.

Additionally, most prospective clients perform a thorough review of an investment manager’s background, investment policies and performance before committing assets to that manager. In many cases, prospective clients invite a number of competing firms to make presentations. The process of obtaining a new client typically takes twelve to eighteen months from the time of the initial contact. While we have achieved a high degree of success in competing successfully for new clients, it is a process to which we must continue to dedicate significant resources over an extended period, with no certainty of success.

Regulation

Westwood Management

Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect investment advisory clients and stockholders of registered investment advisers. Under such laws and regulations, agencies that regulate investment advisers such as ourselves,like us have broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit such an adviseradvisers from carrying on itstheir business in the event that it failsthey fail to comply with such laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, revocation of investment adviser and other registrations, censures and fines. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations.

Our business is subject to regulation at both the federal and state level by the SEC and other regulatory bodies. Westwood Management is registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and under the laws of various states. As a registered investment adviser, Westwood Management is regulated and subject to examination by the SEC. The Investment Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers, including fiduciary duties, record keeping requirements, operational requirements, marketing requirements and disclosure obligations. In addition, Westwood Management also acts as adviser to the recently launcheda family of mutual funds, the WHG Funds, which are registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940. As adviser to a registered investment company, Westwood Management must comply with the requirements of the Investment Company Act and related regulations. The

Investment Company Act imposes numerous obligations on registered investment companies, including requirements relating to operations, fees charged, sales, accounting, record-keeping, disclosure, governance and restrictions on transactions with affiliates. Under the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated pursuant to the federal securities laws, we are subject to periodic examination by the SEC. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Investment Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, ranging from censure to termination of an investment adviser’s registration. The failure of Westwood Management to comply with the requirements of the SEC could have a material adverse effect on Westwood. We must also comply with anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the requirements of the regulations under the Investment Advisers Act, the Investment Company Act and the USA PATRIOT Act.

Westwood Trust

Westwood Trust also operates in a highly regulated environment and is subject to extensive supervision and examination. As a Texas chartered trust company, Westwood Trust is subject to the Texas Finance Code (the “Finance Code”), the rules and regulations promulgated under the Finance Code and supervision by the Texas Department of Banking. These laws are intended primarily for the protection of Westwood Trust’s clients and creditors, rather than for the benefit of investors. The Finance Code provides for and regulates a variety of matters, such as:

The Finance Code also gives the Banking Commissioner broad regulatory powers (including penalties and civil and administrative actions) if the trust company violates certain provisions of the Finance Code or conservatorship or closure if Westwood Trust is determined to be in a “hazardous condition” (as defined by law). Westwood Trust’s failure to comply with the law defines that term).Finance Code could have a material adverse effect on Westwood.

Westwood Trust is limited by the Finance Code in the payment of dividends to undivided profits which is described as that part of equity capital equal to the balance of net profits, income, gains, and losses since its formation date minus subsequent distributions to stockholders and transfers to surplus or capital under share dividends or appropriate board resolutions. At the discretion of its board of directors, Westwood Trust has made quarterly and special dividend payments to Westwood Holdings Group out of its undivided profits.

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

We are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and to the related regulations, insofar as we are a “fiduciary” under ERISA with respect to some of our clients. ERISA and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code impose certain duties on persons who are fiduciaries under ERISA or who provide services to ERISA plan clients and prohibit certain transactions involving ERISA plan clients. Our failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse effect on us.

Employees

At December 31, 2006,2009, we had 4864 full-time employees, including 2027 investment management, research and trading professionals, 1319 marketing and client service professionals, and 1518 operations and business management professionals. None of ourNo employees are represented by a labor union and we considerbelieve our employee relations to be good.

Segment information

For information about our operating segments, Westwood Management and Westwood Trust, please see footnote 1014 “Segment Information”Reporting” in the financial statements accompanying this Report.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. We believe these are allrepresent the material risks currently facing our business. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. You should also refer to the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Report, including our financial statements and related notes.

Poor investment performance of the assets managed by us could adversely affect our results of operations.

Because we compete with many other asset management firms on the basis of asset classes offered and the investment performance of those asset classes, our success is dependent to a significant extent on the investment performance of the assets that we manage. Because our revenue is primarily generated from fees derived as a percentage of assets under management, poor performance tends to result in the loss or reduction of client accounts, which correspondingly decreases revenues. Underperformance relative to peer groups for our various asset classes could adversely affect our results of operations, especially if such underperformance is sustainedcontinues for a lengthy period of time.

Some members of our management employees are considered critical to our success, and our inability to attract and retain key employees could compromise our future success.

We believe that our future success will depend to a significant extent upon the services of our executive officers, particularly Susan M. Byrne, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Investment Officer, and Brian O. Casey, our President and Chief Executive Officer. As with other asset management businesses, our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of these and certain other key officers, investment professionals, and other key marketing, client service and management personnel. There is substantial competition for these types of skilled personnel. Thepersonnel and the loss of the services of one or more of our key employees or our failure to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Our revenues are dependent upon the performance of the securities markets and negative performance of the securities markets could reduce our revenues.

Our results of operations are affected by many economic factors, including the performance of the securities markets. Negative performance inwithin the securities markets or certain segments of those markets, or short-term volatility inwithin the securities markets or segments thereof, could result in investors withdrawing assets, from the markets or decreasing their raterates of investment eitheror shifting assets to cash or other asset classes that we do not manage, all of which could reduce our revenues. Because most of our revenues are based on the value of assets under management, a decline in the value of those assets would also adversely affect our revenues. In addition, in periods of slowing growth or declining revenues, profits and profit margins are adversely affected because certain expenses remain relatively fixed.

In particular, more than half of our assets under management are invested in equity securities of companies with a large market capitalization. As a consequence, we are particularly susceptible to the volatility associated with changes in the market for large capitalization stocks. Due to this concentration, any change or reduction in such markets, including a shift of our clients’ and potential clients’ preference from investments in equity securities of large capitalization stocks to other equity or fixed income securities could have a significant negative impact on our revenues and results of operations. This negative impact could occur due to the depreciation in value of our assets under management, and/or the election by clients to select other firms to manage their assets eitheror the election by clients to allocate assets away from asset classes that we manage. Any of whichthese events would result in decreased assets under management and therefore reduced revenues and a decline in results of operations.

If we are unable to realize benefits from the costs we have incurred and are continuing to incur to develop new asset classes and otherwise broaden our capabilities, our growth opportunities may be adversely affected.

We have incurred significant costs overduring the last several years to develop new asset classes, including SMidCap Value, SmallCap Value, AllCap Value, and Income Opportunity, MidCap, LargeCap Enhanced (130/30) and an MLP portfolio, to launch fourfive new mutual funds under the WHG SMidCap Fund, the WHG Income Opportunity Fund, the WHG LargeCap Value FundFunds name, and the WHG Balanced Fund and also to upgrade our business infrastructure. Some of the costs associated with these improvements will continue to be incurred in future periods and are relatively fixed. We may not realize the benefits of these investments and, in the event we are not able to do so, our growth opportunities may be adversely affected.

Due to the substantial cost and time required to introduce new asset classes in our industry, we may not be able to successfully introduce new asset classes in a timely manner, or at all.

The development and marketing of new asset classes in our industry requires a substantial amount of time and financial resources. Our ability to successfully market and sell a new asset class successfully depends on our financial resources, the performance results of the specific asset class, the timing of the offering and our marketing strategies. Once an asset class is developed, whether through acquisition or internal development, we must still effectively market the asset class to our existing and prospective clients. This entails incurring significantsubstantial financial expensescosts related to research on the target assets and the demand for such asset class in the market, as well as sales and marketing costs associated with attracting assets to the new asset class. In addition, our ability to sell new asset classes to our existing and prospective clients depends on our ability to meet or exceed the performance of our competitors who offer the same or similar asset classes. We may not be able to profitably manage the assets within a given asset class.class profitably. Moreover, it may take years before we are able to produce the level of results that will enable us to attract clients. If we are unable to realize the benefits of the costs and expenses incurred in developing new asset classes, we may experience losses as a result of our management of these asset classes, and our ability to introduce further new asset classes and compete in our industry may be hampered.

Our business is dependent on investment advisory, subadvisory and trust agreements that are subject to termination or non-renewal. As a result, we could lose any of our clients on very short notice.

Substantially all of our revenues are derived pursuant to investment advisory, subadvisory and trust agreements with our clients. In general, either party may terminate these agreements upon 30 daysdays’ notice. Any termination of, or failure to renew, a material number of these agreements could have a material adverse impact on us, particularly because many of our costs are relatively fixed.

A small number of clients account for a substantial portion of our business. As such, the reduction or loss of business with any of these clients could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

One of our largest clients in terms of assets paid us both asset-based and performance-based advisory fees two of the last three years. Due to a significant performance fee earned in 2008, this client accounted for 19.5% of our fee revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008; however, this client did not pay us a performance fee in 2009 and accounted for less than 1% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our four largest four clients accounted for 25.6%approximately 13.1% of totalfee revenues for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2006, and we2009. We are therefore dependent to a significant degree on our ability to maintain our existing relationships with these clients. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining these existing client relationships, or in securing additional clients.clients or achieving the superior investment performance necessary to earn a performance-based advisory fee. Any failure by us to retain one or more of these large clients or establish profitable relationships with additional clients could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competitive fee pressures could reduce revenues and profit margins.

The investment management business is highly competitive and has relatively low barriers to entry. To the extent we are forcedhave to compete on the basis of price, we may not be able to maintain our current fee structure. Although our investment management fees vary from product to product, historically we have competed primarily on the performance of our products and our client service and notrather than on the level of our investment management fees relative to those of our competitors. In recent years however, there has been a trend toward lower fees in the investment management industry. In order to maintain our fee structure in a competitive environment, we must be able to continue to provide clients with investment returns and service that make investors willing to pay our fees. We cannot be assured that we will succeed in providing investment returns and service that will allow us to maintain our current fee structure. Fee reductions on existing or future new business could have an adverse effect on our profit margins and results of operations.

Performance fees could have a significant effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We have performance fee agreements with a small number of our clients, which would pay us a fee if we outperform a specified index over predetermined periods of time. There can be no assurance that we will perform well relative to such indexes and the failure to do so would cause us to earn none or only part of those potential revenues, which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. Our revenues from performance-based fees could fluctuate significantly from one measurement period to the next, depending on how we perform relative to the indexes specified in these agreements. For example, we earned a significant performance fee in 2008, but did not earn a performance fee in 2009.

Any event that negatively affects the asset management industry in general could have a material adverse effect on us.

Any event affecting the asset management industry that results in a general decrease in assets under management or a significant general decline in the number of advisory clients or accounts could negatively impact our revenues. Our future growth and success depends in part upon the growth of the asset management industry.

Our business is subject to extensive regulation with attendant costs of compliance and serious consequences for violations.

Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various laws and regulations including the Investment Advisers Act, the Investment Company Act, and anti-money laundering laws. These laws and regulations generally grant regulatory agencies and bodies broad administrative powers, including in some cases, the power to limit or restrict us from operating our business and, in other cases,as well as the powers to place us under conservatorship or closure in the event we fail to comply with such laws and regulations. Violations of such laws or regulations could subject us and/or our employees to disciplinary proceedings orand civil or criminal liability, including revocation of licenses, censures, fines or temporary suspension, permanent bar from the conduct of business, conservatorship, or closure. Any such proceeding or liability could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. Due to the extensive regulations and laws to which we are subject, our management is required to devote substantial time and effort to legal and regulatory compliance issues.

In addition, the regulatory environment in which we operate is subject to change. We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations or by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations. See “ —Regulation.— Regulation.”

Misuse of assets and information in the possession of our investment professionals and employees could result in costly litigation and liability for us and our clients.

Our investment professionals handle a significant amount of assets along with financial and personal information for our clients. Although we have implemented a system of controls to minimize the risk of a fraudulent taking or misuse of assets and information, there can be no assurance that our controls will be adequate to prevent taking or misusesuch fraudulent actions by our portfolio managers or employees. If our controls are ineffective in preventing the fraudulent taking or misuse of assets and information, we could be subject to costly litigation, which could consume a substantial amount of our resources, and distract our management from our operations, and could also result in regulatory sanctions. Additionally, any such fraudulent actions could adversely affect some of our clients in other ways, and these clients could seek redress against us.

Acquisitions involve inherent risks that could compromise the success of the combined business and dilute the holdings of current stockholders.

As part of our long-term business strategy, we may consider acquisitions of similar or complementary businesses. See “ —Growth— Growth Strategy.” If we are not correct when we assess the value, strengths, weaknesses, liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition candidates or if we are not successful in integrating the operations of the acquired businesses, the success of the combined business could be compromised. Any future acquisitions will be accompanied by the risks commonly associated with acquisitions. These risks include, among others, potential exposure to unknown liabilities of acquired companies and to acquisition costs and expenses, the difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies, the potential disruption to the business of the combined company and potential diversion of management’s time and attention, the impairment of relationships with and the possible loss of key employees and clients as a result of the changes in management, potential future write-downs related to goodwill impairment in connection with acquisitions, and dilution to the stockholders of the combined company if the acquisition is made for stock of the combined company. In addition, asset classes, technologies or businesses of acquired companies may not be effectively assimilated into our business or have a positive effect on the combined company’s revenues or earnings. The combined company may also incur significant expense to complete acquisitions and to support the acquired asset classes and businesses. Further, any such acquisitions may be funded with cash, debt or equity, which could have the effect of diluting the holdings or limiting the rights of stockholders. Finally, we may not be successful in identifying attractive acquisition candidates or completing acquisitions on favorable terms.

We are a holding company and are dependent on the operations and funds of our subsidiaries.

We are a holding company, with no revenue generating operations and no assets other than our ownership interests in Westwood Management and Westwood Trust. Accordingly, we are dependent on the cash flow generated by these operating subsidiaries and must rely on dividends or other intercompany transfers from these operating subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our obligations.

Various factors may hinder the declaration and payment of dividends.

We have historically paid a quarterly dividend. However, the payment of future dividends in the future is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and various factors may prevent us from paying dividends. Such factors include our financial position, capital requirements and liquidity, the existence of a stock repurchase program, any loan agreement restrictions, state corporate and banking law restrictions, results of operations and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider relevant. In addition, as a holding company, our ability to pay dividends is dependent on the dividends and income we receive from our subsidiaries. At the present time our primary source of cash is dividends that may be received from Westwood Management or Westwood Trust. The payment of dividends by Westwood Management or Westwood Trust is subject to the discretion of their Boards of Directors and compliance with applicable laws, including, in particular, the provisions of the Texas Finance Code applicable to Westwood Trust. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Our business is vulnerable to systems failures that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any delays or inaccuracies in securities pricing information or information processing could give rise to claims against us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are highly dependent on communications and information systems and on third party vendors for securities pricing information and updates from certain software. We may suffer a systems failure or interruption, whether caused by an earthquake, fire, other natural disaster, power or telecommunications failure, unauthorized access, act of God, act of war or otherwise, and our back-up procedures and capabilities may not be adequate or sufficient to eliminate the risk of extended interruptions in operations.

We may not be able to fund future capital requirements on favorable terms, if at all.

We cannot be certain that financing to fund our working capital or other cash requirements, if needed, will be available on favorable terms, if at all. Our capital requirements will vary greatly from quarter to quarter depending on, among other things, capital expenditures, fluctuations in our operating results and financing activities. If future financing is necessary, we may or may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all. Further, any future equity financings could dilute the relative percentage ownership of the then existing holders of our common stock, and any future debt financings could involve restrictive covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports, our brand and operating results could be harmed. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

While

We cannot be certain that the measures we continuetake to evaluate and improve our internal controls we cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that we implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time,time; we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in

accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

Our organizational documents contain provisions that may prevent or deter another group from paying a premium over the market price to our stockholders to acquire our stock.

Our organizational documents contain provisions that require a vote of two-thirds of the shares of stock entitled to vote to remove directors for cause, establish that stockholders cannot act by written consent, and that authorize our board of directors to issue, without shareholder approval, blank check preferred stock. In addition, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to business combinations. These provisions could delay, deter or prevent a merger, consolidation, tender offer or other business combination or change of control involving us that could include a premium over the market price of our common stock that some or a majority of our stockholders might consider to be in their best interests.

We are a holding company and are dependent on the operations and funds of our subsidiaries.

Not applicable.We are a holding company, with no revenue generating operations and no assets other than our ownership interests in Westwood Management and Westwood Trust. Accordingly, we are dependent on the cash flow generated by these operating subsidiaries and must rely on dividends or other intercompany transfers from these operating subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our obligations.

Westwood, Westwood Management and Westwood Trust conduct their principal operations through a leased property with approximately 21,600 square feet located in Dallas, Texas. The initial term of the lease agreement expires in May 2011. We believe these facilities will be adequate to serve our currently anticipated business needs.

We are subject from time to time to certain claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe the outcome of these proceedings will have a material impact on our financial position, operations or cash flow.

No matter was submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006.

PART II

Market Information

Our common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “WHG” since July 1, 2002. At December 31, 2006,2009, there were approximately 168170 record holders of our common stock, although we believe that the number of beneficial owners of our common stock is substantially greater. The table below sets forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock, as reported by the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE for the periods indicated.

Dividends

We have declared a cash dividend on our common stock for each quarter since the date that our common stock was first publicly traded. The table below sets forth the quarterly and special dividends declared for the periods indicated.

In addition, on February 7, 20074, 2010 we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20$0.33 per share on our common stock payable on April 2, 20071, 2010 to stockholders of record on March 15, 2007.2010. We currently intend to continue paying cash dividends in such amounts as our boardBoard of directorsDirectors determines is appropriate. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and subject to some limitations under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is the sole stockholder of both Westwood Management and Westwood Trust. Westwood Trust is limited under applicable Texas law in the payment of dividends to undivided profits which is defined as that part of equity capital equal to the balance of net profits, income, gains, and losses since its formation date minus subsequent distributions to stockholders and transfers to surplus or capital under share dividends or appropriate board of director resolutions.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table gives information as of December 31, 20062009 about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under the Third Amended and Restated Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, our only equity compensation plan in effect at that time. The material terms of this plan were approved by our stockholders at our 2006 annual meeting.2009 Annual Meeting.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph compares total stockholder returns of Westwood since July 1, 2002, the date we began trading as a public company after the spin-off,December 31, 2004 with the total return of the Russell 2000 Index and the SNL Asset Manager Index. The SNL Asset Manager Index is a composite of twenty-four32 publicly traded asset management companies.

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return on Investment Since July 1, 2002

The total return for our stock and for each index assumes $100 invested on July 1, 2002December 31, 2004 in our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index, and the SNL Asset Manager Index, including the reinvestment of dividends. Our common stock is traded on the NYSE.

The closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of the year ended December 31, 20062009 was $23.03$36.34 per share. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

Item 6.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data presented below for the five years ended December 31, 2006,2009, except Assets Under Management, is derived from theour consolidated financial statements as audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firm as of and for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and from theour consolidated financial statements as audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm as of and for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and should be read in conjunction with those statements. The data below for a portion of the year ended December 31, 2002 reflects our results as it had historically been operated as a part of SWS. These results may not be indicative of our performance as an independent company. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Item 1. Business” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Report.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” included in this Report, as well as our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Report and the Annual Report to Stockholders that are not purely historical facts, including statements about our expected future financial position, results of operations or cash flows, as well as other statements including words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “goal,” “target,” “designed,” “on track,” “comfortable with,” “optimistic” and other similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results and the timing of some events could differ materially from those projected in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, those set forth below:

Additional factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations are discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report. You should not rely unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. Other unknown or unpredictable factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by the forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to anticipate and may be beyond our control. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

We manage investment assets and provide services for our clients through our two subsidiaries, Westwood Management and Westwood Trust. Westwood Management provides investment advisory services to corporate pension funds,retirement plans, public retirement plans, endowments and foundations, the WHG Funds, other mutual funds and clients of Westwood Trust. Westwood Trust provides to institutions and high net worth individuals trust and custodial services and participation in common trust funds that it sponsors. Our revenues are generally derived from fees based on a percentage of assets under management and at December 31, 2006,2009 Westwood Management and Westwood Trust collectively managed assets valued at approximately $5.9$10.2 billion. We have been providing investment advisory services since 1983 and, according to recognized industry sources, including Morningstar, Inc., when measured over multi-year periods, our principal asset classes have consistently ranked above the median in performance within their peer groups.

One of the priorities on which we have focused since our spin-off in 2002 is building a foundation in terms of personnel and infrastructure to support a potentially much larger business. We have also developed products that we believe will be desirable within our target institutional and private client markets. The cost of developing new products and the organization as a whole has resulted in us incurring expenses that, in some cases, do not currently have material offsetting revenue. Now that we believe the foundation and the products are in place, we are taking these new products

to the institutional marketplace and believe that institutional investors will recognize the value in these products and generate new revenue streams for us.

We began marketing our SMidCap Value product to institutional investment consultants in late 2004. As a result of this targeted marketing effort, we gained a number of meaningfulassets in SMidCap Value clientsincreased from $78 million at December 31, 2004 to $2.7 billion at December 31, 2009. As a result of this growth, the SMidCap Value asset class was closed to new institutional assets in 2005 and 2006.2009. The WHG SMidCap mutual fund remains open. We continue to devote significant marketing effort to our SMidCap Value product and intend to begin marketing our SmallCap Value product, which now has a three-year track record,efforts to the institutional market during 2007.for our LargeCap Value, SmallCap Value, AllCap Value and other products. Our SmallCap Value product has progressed through the approval process at many investment consulting firms and we are seeing interest in this capacity-constrained product. We won our first institutional mandates in AllCap Value in 2009. Between December 2005 and April 2007 we also launched fourfive mutual funds under the WHG Funds name from December 2005 to September 2006.name. As of December 31, 2006,2009, assets in these fourfive funds were approximately $130$566 million. In addition to the funds’ existing institutional share class, in December 2007 we launched an A share for WHG LargeCap Value and WHG Income Opportunity in order to target No Transaction Fee (“NTF”) mutual fund supermarket platforms and the broker/dealer marketplace. We have twoan additional WHG Funds that areFund registered with the SEC, the WHG SmallCap Value Fund and the WHG AllCap Value Fund, and are evaluating opportunities to launch these fundsthis fund in 2007.the future.

Revenues

We derive our revenues from investment advisory fees, trust fees, and other revenues. Our advisory fees are generated by Westwood Management, which manages its clients’client accounts under investment advisory and subadvisory agreements. Advisory fees are calculated based on a percentage of assets under management, and are paid in accordance with the terms of the agreements. Westwood Management’s advisory fees are paid quarterly in advance based on the assets under management on the last day of the preceding quarter, quarterly in arrears based on the assets under management on the last day of the previous quarter, just ended, or are based on a daily or monthly analysis of assets under management for the stated period. Westwood Management recognizes revenues as services are rendered. A limited number of our clients have a performance-based fee component in their contract, which generates additional revenues if we outperform a specified index over a specific period of time. We record revenue for performance-based fees at the end of the measurement periods. In 2008, we recognized a performance-based fee for a client in the second quarter and a separate performance-based fee for another client in the fourth quarter. Since most of our advance paying clients’ billing periods coincide with the calendar quarter to which payment relates, the revenue related to those clients is fully recognized within the quarter. Consequently, there is not a significant amount of deferred revenue contained in our financial statements.

Our trust fees are generated by Westwood Trust pursuant to trust or custodial agreements. Trust fees are separately negotiated with each client and are generally based on a percentage of assets under management, which in turn is influenced by the complexity of the operations of the trust and the services provided.management. Westwood Trust also provides trust services to a small number of clients on a fixed fee basis. Most trust fees are paid quarterly in advance and are recognized as services are rendered. Since the majority of Westwood Trusts’Trust’s advance paying clients’ billing periods coincide with the calendar quarter to which payment relates, the revenue related to those clients is fully recognized within the quarter. Consequently,quarter; consequently, there is not a significant amount of deferred revenue contained in our financial statements.

Our other revenues generally consist of interest and investment income. Although we invest most of our cash in money market funds,U.S. Treasury securities, we also invest in bondsequity instruments and equity instruments.money market funds.

Assets Under Management

Assets under management increased $999 million,$3.0 billion, or 20.3%42%, to $5.9$10.2 billion at December 31, 20062009 compared to $4.9$7.2 billion at December 31, 2005.2008. This increase was primarily due to market appreciation of assets under management and net inflows of assets from new clients. Quarterly average assets under management increased $747 million, or 10%, to $8.5 billion for 2009 compared with $7.7 billion for 2008.

Assets under management decreased $668 million, or 9%, to $7.2 billion at December 31, 2008 compared to $7.9 billion at December 31, 2007. The increasedecrease in assets under management was primarily due to the market appreciationdepreciation of assets under management, andpartially offset by net inflows of assets from new clients, partially offset by the withdrawal of assets by certainand existing clients. Quarterly average assets under management increased $1.1 billion,$813 million, or 25.0%12%, to $5.5$7.7 billion for 20062008 compared with $4.4$6.9 billion for 2005.2007.

Assets under management increased $932 million, or 23.3%, to $4.9 billion at December 31, 2005 compared to $4.0 billion at December 31, 2004. The increase in assets under management was primarily due inflows of assets from new clients and the market appreciation of assets under management, partially offset by the withdrawal of assets by certain clients. Quarterly average assets under management increased $477 million, or 12.2%, to $4.4 billion for 2005 compared with $3.9 billion for 2004.

		As of December 31, (1) (in millions)									% Change
		2006			2005			2004			2006 vs. 2005			2005 vs. 2004
Westwood Management Corp.
Separate Accounts		$	2,578		$	2,357		$	1,853		9.4	%		27.2	%
Subadvisory			953			719			577		32.5			24.6
WHG Funds			130			8			—		1,525.0			—
Westwood Funds			374			373			372		0.3			0.3
Managed Accounts			315			225			169		40.0			33.1
Total			4,350			3,682			2,971		18.1			23.9
Westwood Trust
Commingled Funds			1,229			990			856		24.1			15.7
Private Accounts			225			209			122		7.7			71.3
Agency/Custody Accounts			123			47			47		161.7			—
Total			1,577			1,246			1,025		26.6			21.6
Total Assets Under Management		$	5,927		$	4,928		$	3,996		20.3	%		23.3	%

Westwood Management.In the preceding table, “Separate Accounts” represent corporate pension and profit sharing plans, public employee retirement accounts,funds, Taft Hartley plans, endowments, foundations and individuals. “Subadvisory” represents relationships where Westwood Management provides investment management services for funds offered by other financial institutions. “WHG Funds” represent the family of institutional mutual funds for which Westwood Management serves as advisor. “Westwood Funds” represent the family of mutual funds for which Westwood Management serves as subadvisor. “Managed Accounts” represent relationships with brokerage firms and other registered investment advisors who offer Westwood Management’s products to their customers.

Westwood Trust. In the preceding table, “Commingled Funds” represent funds that have been established to facilitate investment of fiduciary funds of multiple clients by combining assets into a single trust for taxable and tax-exempt entities. “Private Accounts” represent discretionary accounts where Westwood Trust acts as trustee or agent and has full investment discretion. “Agency/Custody Accounts” represent non-discretionary accounts in which Westwood Trust provides agent or custodial services, but does not act in an advisory capacity. For certain assets in this category, Westwood Trust currently provides limited custody services for a minimal or zero fee, currently, but views these assets as potentially converting to fee-generating managed assets in the future. As an example, some assets in this category consist of low-basis stock that iscurrently being held in custody for clients, currently, but will likely transfer to fee-generating managed assets during an intergenerationalinter-generational transfer of wealth at some point in the future.future date.

Results of Operations

The following table and discussion of our results of operations is based upon data derived from theour consolidated statements of income contained in our consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with these statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.Report.

Year Ended December 31, 20062009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20052008

Total Revenue.Our total revenues increaseddecreased by 24.7%8% to $27.4$42.6 million in 20062009 compared with $21.9$46.5 million in 2005. Advisory2008. Asset-based advisory fees increased by 26.4%18% to $17.5$31.8 million in 20062009 from $13.9$27.0 million in 2005 primarily2008 due to growth inhigher average assets under management as a result of existing clients due to market appreciation as well asof assets and net inflows from new clients addedclients. Performance-based advisory fees decreased 100% from $8.7 million in 2006. These increases were partially offset by the withdrawal of assets by certain clients.2008 due to no performance fees earned in 2009. We are eligible to earn a performance fee in 2010 dependent upon out-performance in 2010, subject to an under-performance carry-forward from 2009. Trust fees increaseddecreased by 17.2%6% to $8.2$10.3 million in 20062009 from $7.0$11.0 million in 2005 primarily2008 due to inflows from new clients added in 2006 as well as growth inlower average beginning-of-quarter assets under management in 2009. The vast majority of existing clients due to market appreciation. These increasesour Trust fees is billed in advance based on assets at the end of the previous quarter and were partially offsetnegatively impacted by the withdrawalsharp market decline in the fourth quarter of assets by certain clients.2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Other revenues, which generally consist of interest and investment income, increased by 52.9%280% to $1.6 million$455,000 in 20062009 compared with $1.0 million$(253,000) in 2005.2008. Other revenues increased primarily due to increasesa $1.6 million increase in net unrealized gains. Partially offsetting this increase were an increase of $554,000$456,000 in net realized losses and a $399,000 decrease in interest and dividend income, $150,000 in realized gains and $79,000 in unrealized gains. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $231,000 in consulting revenue from Gabelli Advisers, which was due to the termination of our consulting fee arrangement. We were notified by Gabelli Advisers in the fourth quarter 2006 that our consulting payment arrangement was to be replaced with a dividend payment from Gabelli Advisers, which is included in dividend income. The amount of the dividend was approximately $50,000 less than the amount of consulting payments that had been accrued up to that point.

Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits, which generally consist of salaries, incentive compensation, equity basedequity-based compensation expense and benefits, increased by 29.0%2% to $14.9$23.7 million compared with $11.6$23.2 million in 2005.2008. This increase resultedwas primarily fromdue to an increase of approximately $2.4 million$931,000 in restricted stock expense due to additional restricted stock grants in July 2006, May 2006February 2009 as well as the higher market price at the time the shares were granted compared to prior grants, and July 2005, increasedan increase of $526,000 in salary expense of $726,000 due to increased headcount and salary increases for certain employees and increased headcount. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $845,000 in incentive compensation expense of $207,000, increased payroll taxes related to the increasesand $203,000 in salary and incentive

compensation expense and the payment of dividends on unvested restricted stock, increased employee health insurance expense and increased 401(k) and profit sharing contributions. A decrease of $124,000 in compensation expense relatedcontributions both due to stock options partially offset these increases.lower pretax income. We had 4864 full-time employees as of December 31, 20062009 compared to 4763 at December 31, 2005.2008.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing costs consist of expenses associated with our marketing efforts, including travel and entertainment, direct and consultant marketing, and advertising costs. Sales and marketing costs increaseddecreased by 19.1%28% to $528,000$576,000 in 20062009 compared with $443,000$803,000 in 2005.2008. The increasedecrease is primarily the result of increases in direct marketing expense of $40,000 anddecreases in travel and entertainment costs of $47,000.$135,000 and in direct marketing expense of $69,000.

WHG Mutual Funds. WHG Mutual Funds expenses generally consist of costs associated with our marketing, distribution and administration efforts related to the WHG Funds. WHG mutual funds expenses were $238,000increased 56% to $600,000 in 20062009 compared with $14,000$384,000 in 2005.2008. This substantial increase is primarily due to a $164,000 increase in legal fees and a $40,000 increase in direct marketing expense. Legal fees were related to the launchreorganization of the funds inPhiladelphia Fund into the fourth quarterWHG LargeCap Value Fund. On November 16, 2009, we acquired the business and substantially all of 2005the related assets of Baxter Financial Corporation related to its management of the Philadelphia Fund. In connection with this acquisition, the Philadelphia Fund was reorganized into the WHG LargeCap Value Fund. Related to this acquisition, we recorded total assets of $2.7 million and deferred liabilities of $1.7 million. We paid consideration on the secondclosing date and third quarters of 2006. Currently,are obligated to pay deferred payments twelve and twenty-four months from the largest component of these costs is fund expense reimbursements reflecting our partial subsidy of mutual fund expenses, as we have capped the expense ratios for the funds in order to competitively position them in institutional and defined contribution markets.transaction closing date.

Information Technology. Information technology expenses are generally costs associated with proprietary investment research tools, computing hardware, software licenses, maintenance and support, telecommunications and other related costs. Information technology expense increased by 14.3%10% to $925,000$1.2 million in 20062009 compared with $809,000$1.1 million in 2005.2008. The increase is primarily due to increases of $61,000 in costs related to the addition of a new performance measurement tool for Westwood Trust clients and other application enhancements, $35,000$48,000 in IT environment support costs, $43,000 in software maintenance and $16,000licenses and $43,000 in costs related to the upgrade of a critical application. These increases were partially offset by decreases in website maintenance costs, equipment rental costs and computer hardware depreciation expense.data fees.

Professional Services. Professional services expenses generally consist of audit, external subadvisor expense, legal and other professional fees. Professional services expense increaseddecreased by 15.0%12% to $1.4$1.5 million in 20062009 compared with $1.2$1.7 million in 2005.2008. The increasedecrease is primarily due to a $196,000 increase$354,000 decrease in advisory fees paid to external subadvisors due to increased assets under management in international equity and growth common trust funds sponsored by Westwood Trust and a $68,000 increasebeing temporarily invested in passive index funds. Increases of $73,000 in legal fees. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease of $81,000expense and $56,000 in external audit and Sarbanes-Oxley costs resulting from our change in external auditors forother professional fees partially offset the fiscal year 2006.decrease.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses generally consist of costs associated with the lease of our office space, insurance, office supplies, custody expense, investor relations, charitable contributions and other miscellaneous expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased by 3% to $2.6 million in 2009 compared with $2.7 million in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to decreases of $82,000 in miscellaneous expenses, $43,000 in occupancy expense, $40,000 in custody expense and $30,000 in training and seminars expense. Partially offset these decreases, we incurred an increase of $121,000 in insurance expense as we increased professional liability coverage amounts due to the requirements of certain large new clients.

Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes decreased by 26% to $4.4 million in 2009 compared with $6.0 million in 2008 primarily due to lower income before taxes. The effective tax rate was 35.9% in 2009 compared to 36.2% in 2008.

Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007

Total Revenue.Our total revenues increased by 13.6%28% to $2.1$46.5 million in 20062008 compared with $1.9$36.3 million in 2005.2007. Asset-based advisory fees increased by 24% to $27.0 million in 2008 from $21.7 million in 2007 primarily due to net inflows from new and existing clients. These increases were partially offset by the withdrawal of assets by certain clients. Performance-based advisory fees increased 189% to $8.7 million in 2008 from $3.0 million in 2007 primarily due to an out-performance fee of $5.2 million carried over from 2007, which was subject to potential under-performance reductions in 2008, which did not occur. Performance fees for 2008 out-performance were fully recognized in 2008 and there is no carryover into 2009. We are eligible to earn a performance fee in 2009 dependent on out-performance in 2009. Trust fees increased by 7% to $11.0 million in 2008 from $10.3 million in 2007 primarily due to higher average fee realizations. Other revenues, which generally consist of interest and investment income, decreased by 120% to $(253,000) in 2008 compared with $1.3 million in 2007. Other revenues decreased primarily due to an $872,000 increase in unrealized losses, a $405,000 decrease in net realized gains and a $390,000 decrease in interest income. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase of $143,000 in dividend income.

Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits increased by 26% to $23.2 million compared with $18.4 million in 2007. This increase resulted primarily due to an increase of $1.6 million in incentive compensation expense due to higher pretax income, an increase of approximately $1.4 million in restricted stock expense due to additional restricted stock grants in February 2008 and July 2007, an increase of $1.2 million in salary expense due to increased headcount and salary increases for certain employees, and an increase of $251,000 in profit sharing contributions. We had 63 full-time employees as of December 31, 2008 compared to 52 at December 31, 2007.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing costs increased by 38% to $803,000 in 2008 compared with $581,000 in 2007. The increase is primarily the result of increases in travel and entertainment costs of $185,000 and in direct marketing expense of $31,000.

WHG Mutual Funds. WHG mutual funds expenses increased 139% to $384,000 in 2008 compared with $161,000 in 2007. This increase is primarily due to an $189,000 increase in shareholder servicing expense and a $106,000 increase in legal fees. Decreased fund reimbursement expense due to lower reimbursements due to a higher level of assets in the funds compared to last year partially offset these increases.

Information Technology. Information technology expense increased by 15% to $1,114,000 in 2008 compared with $970,000 in 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases of $82,000$43,000 in theIT environment support costs, $32,000 in software maintenance and licenses, $30,000 in quotations and $24,000 in research tools.

Professional Services. Professional services expense increased by 7% to $1.7 million in 2008 compared with $1.6 million in 2007. The increase is primarily due to a $55,000 increase in advisory fees paid to our independent directors, $50,000external subadvisors due to increased average assets under management in charitable contributions, $50,000 from the write-offgrowth and high yield common trust funds sponsored by Westwood Trust, a $33,000 increase in other professional fees related to collective fund start-up costs and an increase in public relations expense and a $21,000 increase in legal expense.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by 14% to $2.7 million in 2008 compared with $2.3 million in 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases of uncollectible receivables$147,000 in custody expense due to the terminationaddition of the Gabelli Advisers consulting fee arrangement and $24,000a second international subadvisor at Westwood Trust, $39,000 in occupancy costs.expense, $36,000 in miscellaneous expenses and $36,000 in office supplies expense.

Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes increased by 15.7%41% to $2.8$6.0 million in 20062008 compared with $2.4$4.3 million in 20052007 primarily due to higher income before taxes. The effective tax rate was 38.4%36.2% in 20062008 compared to 39.8%34.9% in 2005. The effective tax rate in 2006 is lower than 2005 because $135,000 of restricted stock expense in 2005 was not deductible for tax purposes due to the grant price exceeding the market price on the date of vest.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle, Net of Tax. In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123 (R)”), requiring public companies to recognize the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions in their financial statements. We applied the fair value provisions of the original SFAS No. 123 for all options and restricted shares we issued and accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. Under SFAS No. 123 (R) we are required to estimate the effect of forfeitures. As a result, on January 1, 2006 we recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle totaling $39,000, net of tax, in order to reverse compensation expense recorded for unvested securities as of December 31, 2005 that is in excess of what we estimate will vest.

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004

Total Revenue.Our total revenues increased by 9.8% to $21.9 million in 2005 compared with $20.0 million in 2004. Advisory fees increased by 6.1% to $13.9 million in 2005 from $13.1 million in 2004 primarily due to new clients added in 2005 and growth in assets under management of existing clients due to market appreciation. These increases were partially offset by the withdrawal of assets by certain clients. Trust fees increased by 20.8% to $7.0 million in 2005 from $5.8 million in 2004 primarily due to new clients added in 2005 and growth in assets under management of existing clients due to market appreciation. These increases were partially offset by the withdrawal of assets by certain clients. Other revenues, which generally consist of interest and investment income and consulting fees, decreased by 4.8% to $1.0 million in 2005 compared with $1.1 million in 2004. Other revenues decreased primarily due to decreased realized gains of $242,000, a reduction in consulting revenue of $48,000 due to decreased average assets under management in the Westwood Funds as well as increased expenses related to the administration of the Westwood Funds by Gabelli Advisers, Inc. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $229,000 in interest and dividend income due to higher interest rates earned on investments.

Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits increased by 18.0% to $11.6 million compared with $9.8 million in 2004. This increase was due primarily to increases of $864,000 in restricted stock expense related to a full year of amortization of the 2004 grant and six months of amortization of the 2005 grant in 2005 compared to six months of amortization of the 2004 grant in the prior year, $505,000 in incentive compensation expense in 2005 compared to 2004, $287,000 in salary expense due to increased headcount and salary increases, $79,000 in 401(k) match expense due to an increase in our match rate from 4% in 2004 to 6% in 2005, $66,000 in health insurance expense primarily due to increased premiums and $40,000 in profit sharing expense due to an increased compensation base. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $117,000 in deferred compensation expense due to the termination of our deferred compensation plan in 2004. At December 31, 2005 we had 47 full-time employees compared to 45 at December 31, 2004.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing costs decreased by 6.3% to $443,000 in 2005 compared with $473,000 in 2004. The decrease is primarily the result of decreases in direct marketing expense of $23,000 and advertising costs of $19,000. An increase of $8,000 in travel and entertainment costs partially offset the decreases.

WHG Mutual Funds. WHG mutual funds expense was $14,000 in 2005 while no expense was incurred in 2004. The 2005 expense consisted of mutual fund expense reimbursements resulting from the launch of two mutual funds in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Information Technology. Information technology expense increased by 16.9% to $809,000 in 2005 compared with $692,000 in 2004. The increase is primarily due to increases of $58,000 in support costs, $52,000 in costs related to the implementation of new customer relationship management and email archiving systems, $28,000 in computer hardware depreciation expense and $10,000 in website maintenance costs. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $23,000 in equipment rental costs and $9,000 in costs associated with investment research tools.

Professional Services. Professional services expense decreased by 4.3% to $1.2 million in 2005. The decrease is primarily due to a $134,000 decrease in professional fees primarily related to lower Sarbanes-Oxley compliance costs, a decrease in other professional fees of $71,000 and a decrease in legal fees of $66,000. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase of $166,000 in advisory fees paid to external subadvisors due to increased assets under management in international equity and growth common trust funds sponsored by Westwood Trust, as well as the engagement of a subadvisor in the second quarter of 2004 to manage growth portfolios at Westwood Trust and an increase of $60,000 in external audit expense.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by 4.9% to $1.9 million in 2005 compared with $1.8 million in 2004. The increase is primarily due to increases of $58,000 in occupancy costs due to the new office space we moved into in mid 2004, $53,000 in depreciation due to office furnishings purchased in mid 2004, $19,000 in custody expense due to increased assets under management at Westwood Trust, $16,000 in property taxes due to the new office space and furnishings and $11,000 in director’s fees primarily due to an increase in the

number of outside directors. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $60,000 in stationery and printing costs, office supplies and other costs incurred in 2004 associated with moving and furnishing our corporate office and $41,000 in other administrative expenses.

Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes increased by 4.7% to $2.4 million in 2005 compared with $2.3 million in 2004 primarily due to higher income before taxes. The effective tax rate was 39.8% in 2005 compared to 38.4% in 2004.2007. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2005 was primarily due primarily to a decreasemore taxable income in the deduction35% tax bracket for restricted stock that vestedfederal income taxes than in 2005, which was driven by the market price on the vesting date being lower than the price on the grant date.previous year.

Supplemental Financial Information

As supplemental information, we are providing non-GAAPnon-generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”) performance measures that we refer to as cash earnings and cash expenses. We provide these measures in addition to, but not as a substitute for, net income and total expenses, which are reported on a GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) basis. Both our Management and Board of Directors review cash earnings and cash expenses to evaluate our ongoing performance, allocate resources and review dividend policy. We believe that these non-GAAP performance measures, while not substitutes for GAAP net income and total expenses, are useful for both management and investors to evaluate our underlying operating and financial performance and our available resources. We do not advocate that investors consider these non-GAAP measures without considering financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.

In calculating cash earnings, we add to net income the non-cash expense associated with equity-based compensation awards of restricted stock and stock options. In calculating cash earnings foroptions, amortization of intangible assets and the year ended December 31, 2006, we also eliminatedeferred taxes related to the non-cash cumulative effecttax-basis amortization of change in accounting principle associated with our implementation of SFAS No.123 (R).goodwill. We define cash expenses as total expenses less non-cash equity-based compensation expense.expense and amortization of intangible assets. Although depreciation on fixed assets is a non-cash expense, we do not add it back when calculating cash earnings or deduct it when calculating cash expenses because depreciation charges represent a decline in the value of the related assets that will ultimately require replacement.

For the year ended December 31, 2006,2009, our cash earnings increaseddecreased by 51.6%10% to $9.1$15.6 million compared with $6.0$17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005,2008, primarily due to a 24.7% increasean 8% decrease in total revenues.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to cash earnings and total expenses to cash expenses for the years presented:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically we have funded our operations and cash requirements with cash generated from operating activities. As of December 31, 2006,2009, we had no long-term debt. The changes in net cash provided by operating

activities generally reflect the changes in earnings plus the effect of non-cash items and changes in working capital. Changes in working capital, especially accounts receivable and accounts payable, are generally the result of timing differences between collection of fees billed and payment of operating expenses.

During 2006,2009, cash flow provided by operating activities, principally our investment advisory business, was $7.2$10.6 million compared to cash used in operations of $6.3 million during 2008 and $2.4cash provided by operations of $11.7 million during 2005 and 2004, respectively.2007. The increase of $940,000 from 2005$16.9 million was due primarily to 2006 was primarily due to increased cash earnings, offset in part by the reduced net change in operating assetspurchases of U.S. Treasury Bills and liabilities. The increase of $3.8 million from 2004 to 2005 was primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable. The decrease of $18.0 million from 2007 to 2008 was due primarily to the net purchasespurchase of trading securities, increasedU.S. Treasury Bills and an increase in accounts receivable, partially offset by an increase in cash earnings and the net change in operating assets and liabilities.earnings. At December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, we had working capital of $19.7$43.0 million and $18.3$35.2 million, respectively.

Cash flow provided byused in investing activities during 20062009 was $0.9$1.7 million and was primarily related to net sales of available-for-sale investments. Cash provided by investing activities during 2005 of $1.0 million was primarily related to net sales of available-for-sale investments and cash paid to acquire a business. Cash flow used in investing activities during 20042008 of $112,000$13.1 million was primarily relateddue to the build-out and furnishingnet sales of investments, partially offset by the Company’s new office space, offsetpurchase of fixed assets. Cash flow used in part byinvesting activities during 2007 of $3.1 million was primarily due to net purchases of available-for-sale investments.

Cash used in financing activities during 2006 of $9.5 million, $7.9 million and $6.2 million during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was primarily relateddue to the payment of cash dividends on our commonand the purchase of treasury stock, of $8.3 million, offset in part by $402,000 in proceeds received from stock option exercises. Cash used in financing activities during 2005 and 2004 was $6.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively, and was primarilyexcess tax benefits related to vested restricted shares and proceeds from the paymentissuance of cash dividends on our common stock.stock due to option exercises.

We had cash and investments of $20.1$45.1 million and $19.8$31.7 million at December 31, 20062009 and December 31, 2005,2008, respectively. As required by the Texas Finance Code, Westwood Trust maintains current assets in an amount equal to the required minimum restricted capital of $1.0 million, which is included in Investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We had no liabilities for borrowed money at December 31, 20062009 or December 31, 2005,2008, and our accounts payable were paid in the ordinary course of business for each of the periods then ended.

Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors including our results of operations, the timing and magnitude of capital expenditures or strategic initiatives, and our dividend policy.policy and other business and risk factors described in this Form 10-K. We believe that current cash and short-term investment balances and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet the operating and capital requirements of our ordinary business operations through at least the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurance that we will not require additional financing within this time frame. The failure to raise needed capital on attractive terms, if at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20062009 (in thousands).

Accounting Developments

In June 2006,December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards BoardFASB amended ASC No. 805, “Business Combinations” (“FASB”ASC 805”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting. ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for uncertaintyhow an acquirer: (1) recognizes and measures in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’sits financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 prescribesthe acquiree; (2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or gain from a recognition thresholdbargain purchase; and measurement attribute for(3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statement recognitionstatements to evaluate the nature and measurementfinancial effects of a tax position takenthe business combination. ASC 805 applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or expected to be taken in a tax return. The provisionsafter the beginning of FIN 48 are effectivethe first reporting period for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2006.2008. We adopted ASC 805 during 2009 and it did not impact our financial statements.

In December 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures for interests in variable interest entities (“VIE”). This standard changes the manner in which an entity determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, whether that VIE should be consolidated and requires additional disclosures. As proposed, SFAS 167 would be effective for our fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS 167 on our financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC No. 855, “Subsequent Events” (“ASC 855”). ASC 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. We have evaluated our tax positionsincluded the required disclosure in the tax returns we have filed,notes to our financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued further guidance under ASC No. 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”). The guidance requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as unfiled tax positionsin annual financial statements to improve the transparency and quality of financial reporting and requires those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. This guidance was effective for the amounts

comprising our deferred tax assetsIn April 2009, the FASB issued further guidance under ASC No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and determinedDisclosures” (“ASC 820”). The additional guidance addresses estimating fair value in accordance with ASC 820 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased along with providing guidance on identifying circumstances that FIN 48 willindicate a transaction is not orderly. ASC 820 was effective for the second quarter of 2009 and did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In September 2006,June 2009, the FASB issued FASB StatementASC No. 157, Fair Value Measurements105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“FAS 157”), which addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles. The provisions of FAS 157 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of FAS 157.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”ASC 105”). SAB 108 was issued to provide consistency between how registrants quantify financial statement misstatements. SAB 108ASC 105 established an approach that requires dual quantification of financial statement misstatements based on the effects of the misstatement on the income statement, balance sheet and other disclosures. It is referred toAccounting Standards Codification as the “dual” approach assource of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB and requires references to the codification in place of references to previously issued and organized accounting pronouncements. We adopted ASC 105 during 2009 and it combines two widely used approaches, which focuseddid not have a material impact on either the income statement or the balance sheet. SAB 108 removes the singular focus on either of thoseour financial statements and the lingering errors that could potentially result. SAB 108 allows registrants to initially apply the dual approach either by (1) retroactively adjusting prior financial statements as if the dual approach had always been used or by (2) recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the dual approach as adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2006 with an offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006, and was adopted by us on December 31, 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 had no effect on our financial statements.disclosures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent losses and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In applying accounting principles, we must often make individual estimates and assumptions regarding expected outcomes or uncertainties. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe the following are areas where the degree of judgment and complexity in determining amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements make the accounting policies critical. Historically, actual results have not differed materially from estimates.

Goodwill

During the third quarters of 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, we completed our annual impairment assessment as required by SFAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. No impairment losses were required. We perform our annual impairment assessment as of July 1.1 and would reassess if circumstances indicated a potential impairment between our annual assessment dates. We assess the fair value of our business units with goodwill using a market multiple approach. No events occurred in the last half of 2009 that indicated that these assets should be retested for impairment.

Stock OptionsIntangible Assets

For all options granted after January 1, 2002, we have been expensingOur intangible assets represent the cost associated with employees as well as non-employee directors. Weacquisition date fair value stock options issued based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and recognize this value as an expense over the periods in which the options vest. Implementation of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires us to make certain assumptions, including expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividend yieldmutual fund assets acquired and expectedare reflected net of amortization. In valuing these assets, we made significant estimates regarding the useful life, growth rates and potential attrition of the options.assets acquired. We utilized assumptionsperiodically review our intangible assets for events or circumstances that would indicate impairment. If the carrying value of these assets exceeded the fair value, we believedwould record an impairment to be most appropriate atremove the time of the valuation. Had we used different assumptions in the pricing model the expense recognized for stock options may have been different than the expense recognized in our financial statements. As of December 31, 2006, all outstanding options have vested and all related compensation has been expensed.

Restricted Stock

We have granted restricted stock to employees, non-employee directors and a non-employee directors. In accordance with FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 Revised, weconsultant. We calculate compensation cost for restricted stock grants by using the fair market value of itsour common stock at the date of grant, the number of shares issued and an estimate of shares that will not vest due to forfeitures. This compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. The estimate of shares that will not vest due to forfeitures is based on our historical forfeiture rate and our expectation of potential forfeitures, which is dependent upon our judgment. If actual experience differs significantly from these estimates, stock based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially affected. If forfeitures of restricted stock do not occur or are significantly less than our estimation, we would record as much as $45,000 of compensation cost in addition to what we currently expect to expense over the next 2.2 years.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Our provision for income taxes reflects the statutory tax obligations of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment and complex calculations are used in determining our tax liability and in evaluating our tax positions. We adjust our income tax provision in the period in which we determine that actual outcomes will likely be different from our estimates. Changes in tax laws may result in a change to our tax position and effective tax rate. We classify any interest or penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense.

Deferred income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of our assets and liabilities as measured at enacted income tax rates. Our deferred taxes relate principally to stock-based compensation expense, which is deductible for tax purposes at the time restricted stock vests and stock options are exercised.

Allocation of Purchase Price paid for Baxter Financial Corporation

On November 16, 2009, we acquired the business and substantially all of the related assets of Baxter Financial Corporation related to its management of the Philadelphia Fund. In connection with this acquisition, the Philadelphia Fund was reorganized into the WHG LargeCap Value Fund. Related to this acquisition, we recorded total assets of $2.7 million and deferred liabilities of $1.7 million. We paid consideration on the closing date and are obligated to pay deferred payments twelve and twenty-four months from the transaction closing date. With the assistance of a third party valuation expert, we made assumptions to determine the values of the assets we acquired and the amount of the deferred liabilities we expect to pay. The settlement amounts of these liabilities could be materially different from what we recorded on the acquisition date, based on the value of assets in the acquired customer accounts as of the deferred payment dates. Any such difference would be recorded in our earnings in the periods leading up to the payments.

Significant Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are summarized below.

Revenue Recognition

Investment advisory and trust fees are recognized in the period the services are provided. These fees are determined in accordance with contracts between our subsidiaries and their clients and are generally based on a percentage of assets under management. Performance-based fees may pay us an additional fee if we outperform a specified index over a specific period of time. We record revenue for performance-based fees at the end of the measurement period when the fees have been fully earned.

Accounting for Investments

We have designated our investments, other than money market holdings and shares of Teton Advisors, Inc. (“Teton shares”), as “trading” securities, which are recorded at market value with the related unrealized gains and losses reflected in “Other revenues” in the consolidated statements of income. Our “trading” securities, primarily U.S. Government and Government agency obligations as well as mutual fund and common trust fund shares, are valued based upon quoted market prices and, with respect to funds, the net asset value of the shares held as reported by the fund. We have generally designated our investments in money market accounts and the Teton shares as “available for sale.” The market values of our money market holdings generally do not fluctuate. The Teton shares are carried at quoted market value with a 25% discount for lack of marketability. Unrealized gains and losses on the Teton shares are recorded through other comprehensive income. Dividends and interest on all of our investments are accrued as earned.

We utilizeinvest our corporate capital in various financial instruments such as United States treasury bills, equity mutual funds and U.S.United States government and agency obligations, which entail certain inherent market risks. We do not currently participate in any hedging activities, nor do we currently utilize any derivative financial instruments. The following information describes the key aspects of certain financial instruments that have market risks.

Interest Rates and Securities Markets

Our cash equivalents and other investment instruments are exposed to financial market risk due to fluctuations in interest rates, which may affect our interest income. These instruments are not entered into for trading purposes. We do not expect our interest income to be significantly affected by a sudden change in market interest rates.

The value of our assets under management is affected by changes in interest rates and fluctuations in securities markets. Since we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from investment advisory and trust fees based on the value of assets under management, our revenues may be adversely affected by changing interest rates or a decline in the prices of securities generally.

The independent registered public accounting firm’s reports and financial statements listed in the accompanying index are included in Item 15 of this report.Report. See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.None.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of December 31, 2006,2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Please refer to Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.’s Management Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting on page F-5F-4 of this Report.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on (1) our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and (2) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report can be found on page F-4.F-3.

For the quarterfiscal year ended December 31, 2006,2009, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Not applicable.

PART III

The information required by this item is or will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 20072010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc., which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Proxy Statement”). This definitive proxy statementThe Proxy Statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in this Form 10-K by this item are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

The information required by this item is or will be set forth in the Proxy Statement. This definitive proxy statementThe Proxy Statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in this Form 10-K by this item are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

The information required by this item is or will be set forth in the Proxy Statement. This definitive proxy statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to

be set forth in this Form 10-K by this item are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

The information required by this item is or will be set forth in the Proxy Statement. This definitive proxy statementStatement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in this Form 10-K by this item are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

The information required by this item is or will be set forth in the Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in this Form 10-K by this item are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

The information required by this item is or will be set forth in the Proxy Statement. This definitive proxy statementThe Proxy Statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in this Form 10-K by this item are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

PART IV

Financial Statement Schedules

The financial statements included in this Report are listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Report. Schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are either not required under the related instructions or inapplicable.

Exhibits

The exhibits required to be furnished pursuant to Item 15 are listed in the Exhibit Index filed herewith, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the undersigned directors and officers of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. hereby constitutes and appoints Brian O. Casey and William R. Hardcastle, Jr., or any one of them, its, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for it, him or her and in its, his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, with full power to act alone, to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and to file each such amendment to the Report, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as it, he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 22, 200725, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Frederick R. MeyerS/    RICHARD M. FRANK				Director
Frederick R. Meyer Richard M. Frank
/s/ Jon L. Mosle, Jr.S/    ROBERT D. MCTEER				Director
Jon L. Mosle, Jr. Robert D. McTeer
/s/ Richard M. FrankS/    FREDERICK R. MEYER				Director
Richard M. Frank Frederick R. Meyer
/s/ Raymond E. WooldridgeS/    JON L. MOSLE, JR.				Director
Jon L. Mosle, Jr.
/S/    GEOFFREY R. NORMAN				Director
Geoffrey R. Norman
/S/    RAYMOND E. WOOLDRIDGE				Director
Raymond E. Wooldridge

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders ofShareholders

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006,2009 and December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(revised 2004) – “Share-Based Payment”.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 22, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the twothree years in the period ended December 31, 2005.2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, suchthe consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20052009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the twothree years in the period ended December 31, 2005,2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Dallas, Texas

February 22, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.:

We also have audited, management’s assessment, included in accordance with the accompanying Reportstandards of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.’s Management Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effectivethe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas

February 25, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

We have audited Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.’s Management Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on the criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2006,2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholder’sstockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 22, 200725, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

REPORT OF WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.’S MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL

CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.:

The management of Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (“Westwood”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Westwood’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The management of Westwood assessed the effectiveness of Westwood’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.2009. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2006,2009, Westwood’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Westwood’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on our assessment of Westwood’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page F-4.F-3.

February 22, 200725, 2010

Dallas, Texas

WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 20062009 and 20052008

(in thousands, except par values and share amounts)