UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission File No. 0-25837

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4200, Chicago, Illinois 60606-6303

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(312) 496-1200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  x            Accelerated Filer  ¨            Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 20062007 was approximately $606,781,148$922,072,818 based upon the closing market price of $33.84$51.24 on that date of a share of Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market. As of February 23, 2007,20, 2008, there were 17,792,70517,277,025 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 23, 2007,22, 2008, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (“Heidrick & Struggles”) is a leading provider of executive search and leadership consulting services. We help our clients build leadership teams by facilitating the recruitment, management and deployment of senior executives for their executive management and board positions. Focusing on top-level services offers us several advantages that include access to and influence with key decision makers, increased potential for recurring search consulting engagements, higher fees per search, enhanced brand visibility, and leveraged global footprint, which create added barriers to entry for potential competitors. Working at the top of client organizations also allows us to attract and retain high-caliber consultants.

In addition to executive search, we provide a range of leadership consulting services to clients. These services include succession planning, top team effectiveness, executive assessment, talent management, executive development, and M&A human capital effectiveness.

Heidrick & Struggles has been in the executive search business for more than 50 years. We provide our services to a broad range of clients through the expertise of more than 388386 consultants located in major cities around the world. For many of our clients, our global access to and knowledge of regional and functional markets and candidate talent is an important differentiator of our business. We provide our executive search services on a retained basis, recruiting senior executives whose first year base salary and bonus averages $300,000average approximately $345,000 in 2007 on a worldwide basis. Our clients include the following:

The executive search industry is highly fragmented, consisting of several thousand executive search firms worldwide. BasedThe Association of Executive Search Consultants (AESC) estimated that the market for retained executive search was $9.8 billion in 2007, and based on trade publication reports, we estimate that fewer than 10five executive search firms/alliances each generated more than $100$400 million in worldwide revenue during 2006.2007. Executive search firms are generally separated into two broad categories: retained and contingency. Retained executive search firms fulfill their clients’ senior leadership needs by identifying potentially qualified candidates and assisting clients in evaluating and assessing these candidates for positions typically with annual cash compensation of $150,000 and above.candidates. Retained executive search firms generally are compensated for their services regardless of whether the client employs a candidate identified by the search firm and are generally retained on an exclusive basis. In contrast, contingency search firms usually focus primarily on positions with annual cash compensation of less than $150,000 and are compensated only upon successfully placing a recommended candidate. Retained executive search firms normally charge a fee for their services equal to approximately one-third of the first year’s total compensation for the position being filled.

We are a retained executive search firm. Our search process typically consists of the following steps:

In October of 2006, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Highland Partners, a leading retained executive search boutique and a division of Hudson Highland Group, Inc., through an asset purchase funded from existing cash for $36.0 million including $1.2 million of capitalized acquisition costs. Hudson Highland Group will also be eligible to receive earnout payments of up to $15.0 million based on the acquired consultants achieving certain revenue metrics in 2007 and 2008. The total purchase price, including the $36.6 million paid at closing and the 2007 and 2008 earnout payments will not exceed $51.6 million. All 48 of the Highland Partners consultants who were offered employment by us have accepted and joined our Company.

Available Information

We maintain an Internet website athttp://www.heidrick.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports are available free of charge on this site as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also post news releases on our financial results, investor presentations and other documents containing additional information related to our companyCompany on this site. Our Internet website and the information contained in or accessible from our website are for informational purposes only and are not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Organization

Our organizational structure, which is arranged by geography and industry/functional practices, is designed to enable us to better understand our clients’ cultures, operations, business strategies, industries and regional markets for executive talent.

Geographic StructureStructure..    We provide senior-level executive search and leadership consulting services to our clients worldwide through a network of more than 60 offices in 2633 countries. Major locations are staffed with consultants, research associates, administrative assistants and other support staff. Administrative functions are centralized where possible, although certain support and research functions are situated regionally because of variations in local requirements.

Our worldwide network also includes affiliate relationships in sixthree countries. We have no financial investment in these affiliates but receive licensing fees from them for the use of our name and our databases. Licensing fees were $1.0$0.8 million and $0.3$1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20062007 and 2005,2006, respectively.

Industry PracticesPractices..    We report and operate our executive search business in seven broad industry groups: Financial Services, Consumer, Industrial, Technology, Health Care,Care/Life Sciences, Professional Services and Higher Education/Nonprofit.Nonprofit/Other. These industry categories and their relative sizes, as measured by net revenue for 2006,2007 are as follows:

While thoseWithin each broad industry groupsgroup are useful for tracking purposes,a number of industry subsectors. Consultants often specialize in one or more subsectors to provide clients with market intelligence and candidate knowledge specific to their industry. For example, within the Financial Services sector our business is quite diversified among a number of industry

subsectors including Asset & Wealth Management, Consumer Financial Services, Investment Banking and Capital Markets, Insurance, Private Equity/Venture Capital, and Real Estate.

In an effort to more effectively service our global accounts, we know that understanding the unique needs of each client—undertook an initiative in terms of such factors as competitive landscape, businessJuly 2007 to change our go-to-market strategy and operations—is integral to providing quality service. Thus, our functional and industry practice structure is designed to reflect the needs ofprovide our clients and our enhanced focus on certain market sectors. Certain practices are organized globally, while others have a regional or local focus, as follows:

Our Global Industry Practices are: Business & Professional Services; Consumer; Financial Services; Industrial; Life Sciences; Private Equity & Venture Capital; and Technology.

Other Practices with a regional or localmore unified executive search team. We shifted our client approach from teams working with a geographic orientation to worldwide industry practice-based teams. This change in focus are: Diversity Services; Education/Nonprofit; Interim Executives.

Certain markets haveallows us to better leverage our global diversity and market intelligence to improve client service. Each client is served by one global account team instead of a significant concentration of companies within particular industry sectors. For example,different account team in each region. We believe that this client service approach is a key differentiator from our Financial Services practice has its largest concentration of consultants in New York and London, two of the world’s largest financial centers. Each industry practice is managed by a Practice Managing Partner who facilitates the respective group’s marketing activities.competition.

Functional PracticesPractices..    Our executive search consultants also specialize in searches for specific “C-level” functional positions, which are roles that generally report directly to the chief executive officer. These include chief financial officers, chief information officers, chief legal officers, chief marketing officers and chief human resources officers. Our functional specialists maintain continuous awareness of candidate talent.

Our Global Functional Practices are:include CEO & Board of Directors; Chief Information Officer;Officers; Chief Sales Officers; Chief Marketing Officer; Financial Officer; Chief Human Resources Officers; Human Resources; Legal;Legal, Risk & Compliance; Real Estate; Research & Development; and Supply Chain.Chain & Transportation.

Executive search consultants from each of our Client Services groups may work from any one of our offices around the world. For example, an executive search for a chief financial officer of an industrial company located in the United Kingdom may involve a consultant in the United Kingdom with an existing relationship with the client, another executive search consultant in the United States with expertise in our Industrial practice and a third executive search consultant with expertise in chief financial officer recruiting. This same industrial client may also engage us to perform skill-based assessments for each of its senior managers, which could require the expertise of a professional trained in this service.

Information by Geographic Segment

Americas.    As of December 31, 2006,2007, we had 218204 executive search consultants operating in our Americas segment, which includes the United States, Canada, Mexico and Latin America, principally Argentina, Brazil and Chile. Our Americas segment generated approximately 56%53.8% of our worldwide net revenue in 2006.2007. The largest offices in this segment in terms of net revenue are located in New York, Chicago and Atlanta.Los Angeles.

Europe.    As of December 31, 2006,2007, we had 125121 executive search consultants operating in 13our European countries.segment which includes the Middle East and Africa. Our European segment generated approximately 34%33.5% of our worldwide net revenue in 2006.2007. The United Kingdom, Germany and France produced the highest levels of net revenue in this segment.

Asia Pacific.    As of December 31, 2006,2007, we had 4561 executive search consultants operating in operating the Asia Pacific segment. This segment generated approximately 10%12.7% of our worldwide net revenue in 2006.2007. China (including Hong Kong), Australia and Japan produced the highest levels of net revenue in this segment.

For financial information relating to each geographic segment, see Note 19,18,Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality

While thereThere is no discernible seasonality in our business and revenue and operating income have historically varied by quarter and are hard to predict from quarter to quarter. Although as a percentage of total annual net

revenue, the first quarter is typically the lowest. On average, the variance between the highest and lowest amount of quarterly net revenue, as expressed as a percentage of annual net revenue, is approximately two percentage points.

Clients and Marketing

Our consultants market the firm’s executive search services through two principal means: targeted client calling and industry networking with clients and referral sources. These efforts are supported by proprietary databases, which provide our consultants with information as to contacts made by their colleagues with particular referral sources, candidates and clients. In addition, we benefit from a significant number of referrals generated by our reputation for high quality service and successfully completed assignments, as well as repeat business resulting from our ongoing client relationships.

Either by agreement with clients or for client relationship purposes, executive search firms generally refrain from recruiting some employees of a client, and possibly other entities affiliated with that client, for a specified period of time but typically not more than one year from the commencement of a search. We seek to mitigate any adverse effects of these off-limits arrangements by strengthening our long-term relationships, allowing us to communicate our belief to prospective clients that we can conduct searches without these off-limits arrangements impeding the quality of our work.

No single client accounted for more than 3% of our net revenue in 2007, 2006 2005 or 2004.2005. Our top ten clients in 2007 in aggregate accounted for less than 9% of total net revenue.

Information Management Systems

We rely on technology to support our consultants and staff in the search process. Our technology infrastructure consists of internally developed databases containing candidate profiles and client records, coupled with online services and industry reference sources. We use technology to manage and share information on current and potential clients and candidates, to communicate to both internal and external constituencies and to support administrative functions.

Professional Staff and Employees

Our executive search professionals are generally categorized either as consultants or associates. Associates assist consultants by conducting research, making initial contact with candidates in some instances and performing other search-related functions. As of December 31, 2006,2007, we had 1,5501,647 full-time equivalent employees, of whom 388386 were executive search consultants, 407465 were associates and 755796 were other search, support and corporate staff.

In each of the past five years, no single consultant accounted for a material portion of our net revenue. We recruit our consultants both from other executive search firms or consultants new to search who have worked in industries represented by our practices. In the latter case, these are often seasoned executives with extensive contacts and outstanding reputations who are entering the search profession as a second career, and who we train in our techniques and methodologies. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement, and we consider relations with our employees to be good.

Competition

The executive search industry is highly competitive. While we face competition to some degree from all firms in the industry, we believe our most direct competition comes from four established global retained executive search firms that conduct searches primarily for the most senior-level positions within an organization. In particular, our competitors include Egon Zehnder International, Korn/Ferry International, Russell Reynolds

Associates, Inc. and Spencer Stuart & Associates. To a lesser extent, we also face competition from smaller boutique or specialty firms that specialize in certain regional markets or industry segments. Each firm with which we compete is also a competitor in the marketplace for effective consultants. The Association of Executive Search Consultants (AESC)AESC estimated the market

size for the executive recruiting industry was $8.7$9.8 billion worldwide in 2006. Combined,2007. We believe that the combined revenues of our Company and our top four competitors represent approximately 27%29% of this market.

Overall, the search industry has relatively few barriers to entry. Higher barriers exist, however, for global retained executive search firms like ours that focus primarily on conducting searches for senior-level positions. At this level, clients rely more heavily on a search firm’s reputation, global access and the experience level of its consultants. We believe that the segment of executive search in which we compete is more quality-sensitive than price-sensitive. As a result, we compete on the level of service we offer, reflected by our client services specialties and, ultimately, by the quality of our search results. We believe that our emphasis on senior-level executive search, the depth of experience of our search consultants and our global presence enable us to compete favorably with other executive search firms.

Competition in our leadership consulting services is highly fragmented, with no universally recognized market leaders.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers as of March 1, 2007February 28, 2008 are as follows:

There are no family relationships between any executive officer or director. The following information sets forth the business experience for at least the past five years for each of our executive officers as of March 1, 2007:February 28, 2008:

L. Kevin Kelly was elected as our Chief Executive Officer and a Director in September 2006. Previously, Mr. Kelly was President, Europe/Middle East/Africa and Asia Pacific from March 2005 to September 2006, Regional Managing Partner, Asia Pacific from September 2002 to March 2005, and Office Managing Partner, Tokyo from February 2002 to September 2002. He joined us in 1997.

K. Steven Blake has been our General Counsel and Secretary since joining us in July 2005 and was named Executive Vice President in January 2007. Previously, Mr. Blake was General Counsel of Aquion Partners, LP from 2001 to 2005. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Blake was Associate General Counsel for General Electric Capital Corporation.

Charles G. Davishas been our Regional Managing Partner, Asia Pacific since September 2006, Office Managing Partner, Sydney since January 2006, and Managing Partner of our Chief Information Officer Practice in Asia Pacific since October 2002. Previously, Mr. Davis was Managing Partner of our Technology and Business & Professional Services PracticePractices in Asia Pacific from April 1999 to December 2005. He joined us in 1998.

Michael FranzinoValerie E. Germainhas been our Chairman, Global Markets since September 2005 and Co-Head of Target Accounts since January 2004. Previously, Mr. Franzino was Managing Partner, ofStrategic Partnerships since July 2007 and has been a Partner in our Financial Services Practice from October 2001 to December 2006 and Office Managing Partner, New York—Wall Street from January 2003 to December 2004. He joinedsince joining us in 1999.September 2003. From 1991 to 2003, Ms. Germain was a Managing Director at Jay Gaines & Company.

John T.W. HawkinsSanjay Gupta has been our Regional Managing Partner, AmericasSenior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since joining us in JanuaryApril 2007. Previously,From 1999 to 2007, Mr. HawkinsGupta was ExecutiveManaging Partner and Vice President-Corporate Development and External AffairsPresident at MedPointe Pharmaceuticals from 2000 to 2007. Prior to that, between 1990 and 2000, he held numerous leadership roles at Russell Reynolds Associates, including Managing Director and Leader of both the Global Health Care Sector and the Global Board of Directors/CEO Practice.Gartner Inc.

Eileen A. Kamerick has been our Chief Financial Officer since joining us in June 2004. Ms. Kamerick was named Chief Administrative Officer in December 2006 and Executive Vice President in January 2007. Previously, she was Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Bcom3 Group, Inc. from 2001 to 2003 and Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President at United Stationers, Inc. from 2000 to 2001.2003.

David C. Peters has been our Regional Managing Partner, Europe/Middle East/Africa since September 2006. Previously, Mr. Peters was Office Managing Partner, London from October 2003 to November 2006, Area Managing Partner, UK/Europe/Middle East/Africa from July 2004 to March 2005, and Head of our Interim Practice from November 2002 to June 2005. He joined us in 2000.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. As a result of the risks set forth below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, and the risks discussed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

We depend on attracting and retaining qualified consultants.

Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain consultants who possess the skills and experience necessary to fulfill our clients’ executive search needs. Our ability to hire and retain qualified consultants could be impaired by any diminution of our reputation, decrease in compensation levels relative to our competitors or modifications of our total compensation philosophy or competitor hiring programs. If we cannot attract, hire and retain qualified consultants, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

We may not be able to prevent our consultants from taking our clients with them to another firm.

Our success depends upon our ability to develop and maintain strong, long-term relationships with our clients. Although we work on building these relationships between our firm and our clients, in many cases, one or two consultants have primary responsibility for a client relationship. When a consultant leaves one executive search firm and joins another, clients thatwho have established relationships with the departing consultant may move their business to the consultant’s new employer. We may also lose clients if the departing consultant has widespread name recognition or a reputation as a specialist in executing searches in a specific industry or management function. Historically, we have not experienced significant revenue loss from this potential client portability. If we fail to limit departing consultants from moving business to another employer, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our success depends on our ability to maintain our professional reputation and brand name.

We depend on our overall reputation and brand name recognition to secure new engagements and hire qualified consultants. Our success also depends on the individual reputations of our consultants. We obtain many of our new engagements from existing clients or from referrals by those clients. A client who is dissatisfied with our work can adversely affect our ability to secure new engagements. If any factor hurts our reputation, including poor performance, we may experience difficulties in competing successfully for both new engagements and qualified consultants. Failure to maintain our professional reputation and brand name could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because our clients may restrict us from recruiting their employees we may be unable to fill existing executive search assignments.

Clients frequently require us to refrain from recruiting certain of their employees when conducting executive searches on behalf of other clients. These restrictions generally remain in effect for no more than one year following the commencement of an engagement. However, the specific duration and scope of the off-limits arrangements depend on the length of the client relationship, the frequency with which the client engages us to perform searches, the number of assignments we have performed for the client and the potential for future business with the client.

If a prospective client believes that we are overly restricted by these off-limits arrangements from recruiting the employees of our existing clients, these prospective clients may not engage us to perform their executive searches, and as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

We face aggressive competition.

The global executive search industry is extremely competitive and highly fragmented. We compete with other large global executive search firms and with smaller specialty firms. Specialty firms can focus on regional or functional markets or on particular industries. Some of our competitors may possess greater resources, greater name recognition and longer operating histories than we do in particular markets or practice areas. There are limited barriers to entry into the search industry and new search firms continue to enter the market. Many executive search firms that have a smaller client base may be subject to fewer blockingoff-limits arrangements. In addition, our clients or prospective clients may decide to perform executive searches using in-house personnel. Finally, competitors sometimes reduce their fees in order to attract clients and increase market share. Because we typically do not discount our fees, we may experience some loss of net revenue. We may not be able to continue to compete effectively with existing or potential competitors. Our inability to meet these competitive challenges could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely heavily on information management systems.

Our success depends upon our ability to store, retrieve, process and manage substantial amounts of information. To achieve our goals, we must continue to improve and upgrade our information management systems. We may be unable to license, design and implement, in a cost-effective and timely manner, improved information systems that allow us to compete effectively. In addition, business process reengineering efforts may result in a change in software platforms and programs. Such efforts may result in an acceleration of depreciation expense over the shortened expected remaining life of the software. In addition, if we experience any interruptions or loss in our information processing capabilities, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

We face the risk of liability in the services we perform.

We are exposed to potential claims with respect to the executive search process. A client could assert a claim for violations of off-limits arrangements, breaches of confidentiality agreements or professional malpractice. The growth and development of our other leadership consulting services brings with it the potential for new types of claims. A client could assert a claim for violations of off-limits arrangements, breaches of confidentiality agreements or professional malpractice. In addition, candidates and client employees could assert claims against us. Possible claims include failure to maintain the confidentiality of the candidate’s employment search or for discrimination or other violations of the employment laws or malpractice. In various countries, we are subject to data protection laws impacting the processing of candidate information. We maintain professional liability insurance in amounts and coverage that we believe are adequate; however, we cannot guarantee that our insurance will cover all claims or that coverage will always be available. Significant uninsured liabilities could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our multinational operations may be adversely affected by social, political, legal and economic risks.

We generate substantial revenue outside the United States. We offer our services through offices in 2630 countries around the world. We are exposed to the risk of changes in social, political, legal and economic conditions inherent in international operations which could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, we conduct business in countries where the legal systems, local laws and trade practices are unsettled and evolving. Commercial laws in these countries are sometimes vague, arbitrary and inconsistently applied. Under these circumstances, it is difficult for us to determine at all times the exact requirements of such local laws. If we fail to comply with local laws, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. In addition, the global nature of our operations poses challenges to our management, and financial and accounting systems. Failure to meet these challenges could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to align our cost structure with net revenue.

We must ensure that our costs and workforce continue to be in proportion to demand for our services. Failure to align our cost structure and headcount with net revenue could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our net revenue may be affected by adverse economic conditions.

Although our net revenue increased in 2006, coinciding with signs of moderate worldwide economic growth,2007, there can be no assurances that economic conditions will continue to improve or even remain stable. If economic conditions weaken, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

We may not be able to generate sufficient profits to realize the benefit of our net deferred tax assets.

While we were profitable in 2006 and expect to be profitable in 2007 and beyond,We establish valuation allowances against deferred tax assets when there is no assuranceinsufficient evidence that future taxable incomewe will be sufficientable to realize the benefit of certain deferred tax assets we could claim. We establish valuation allowances when there is insufficient evidence for the realizability of these deferred tax assets. TheWe reassess the realizability of the deferred tax assets is reassessed as facts and circumstances dictate. If after future assessments of the realizability of the deferred tax assets, we determine that a lesserlessor or greater allowance is required, we would record a reduction or increase to the income tax expense and the valuation allowance in the period of such determination.

Our inability to successfully integrate Highland Partners and otherconsultants hired through acquisitions may have an adverse effect on our business.

We completed the acquisition ofacquired Highland Partners in the fourth quarter of 2006. While we2006 and RentonJames in the first quarter of 2007. We intend to continue to grow through selective acquisitions, however, we may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition candidates, consummate acquisitions on satisfactory terms or integrate the acquired businesses effectively and profitably into our existing operations. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to complete the integration of Highland Partners and other acquisitions successfully into our operations. In addition, failureFailure to successfully integrate Highland Partnersnew employees and complementary businesses may adversely affect our profitability by creating operating inefficiencies that could increase operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues and reduce operating income. Further, after any acquisition, the acquired businesses’ clients may choose not to move their business to us causing an adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets.

Periodically, we perform assessments of the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets. Current valuation estimates indicate that there has been no impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets. FutureIf future events, however, including our financial performance and economic conditions, could cause us to conclude that the value of these assets tohas become impaired, in the future.we would need to record impairment charges. Any resulting impairment loss could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to sublease or assign unused office space could affect our earnings and cash flows.

As a result of prior consolidation and closing of offices in order to reduce costs, we have been left with unused office space for which we are still required to make lease payments. While the majority of the vacated properties have been sublet, at December 31, 2006, there was approximately 60 thousand square feet of unused real estate. The total remaining commitment related to these vacated properties that have not been sublet is $5.1

million, of which $3.3 million has been accrued at December 31, 2006, net of estimated sublease income. Inherent in these accruals are estimates concerning vacancy periods and sublease income. If we are unable to sublease or assign this unused office space within the estimated time frame, if we sublease or assign this office space for amounts less than we had anticipated or if one of our tenants defaults on a sublease, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could suffer.

We have antitakeover provisions that make an acquisition of us difficult and expensive.

Antitakeover provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the Delaware laws make it difficult and expensive for ussomeone to be acquiredacquire us in a transaction which is not approved by our Board of Directors. Some of the provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws include:

These provisions could discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction in which stockholders could receive a premium over the current market price for the common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. We have offices in major metropolitan areas in 2630 countries around the world. All of our offices are leased. We do not own any real estate. The aggregate square footage of office space under lease was approximately 765822 thousand as of December 31, 2006.2007. These office leases call for future minimum lease payments of $152.0approximately $204 million and have terms that expire between 20072008 and 2020,2024, exclusive of renewal options that we can exercise. Approximately 126150 thousand square feet of office space has been sublet to third parties. SeeRisk Factors included in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information concerning unused office space.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We have contingent liabilities from various pending claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business, some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Some of these matters are covered by insurance. Although our ultimate liability in these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, we believe the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

In December 2002, Mt. Sinai Medical Center of MiamiSeptember 2007, Whitney Group and Whitney Group Asia (collectively “Whitney Group”) filed suit against us regarding a search for a chief executive officer we performed in 1998. The suit sought damages, including between $59 million and $75 million, based primarily upon the operating loss incurred by Mt. Sinai in 2001, the chief executive officer’s last year at the hospital. On June 30, 2004, the judge presiding over this case in the U.S. DistrictNew York Supreme Court, forNew York County, seeking injunctive relief and damages relating to the Southern Districtresignation, and subsequent hiring by us, of Florida granted summary judgmentcertain Whitney Group employees based in favorHong Kong. On December 19, 2007, the parties to the suit agreed to a settlement in principle and release of the Company, dismissing all claims, made by Mt. Sinai. Mt Sinai then filed an appeal with respect to this decision. On July 12, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11^th Circuit Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to dismiss all claims made against us. On July 31, 2006, Mt. Sinai filed a petition for re-hearing with the 11^th Circuit Court, which petition was denied on August 16, 2006. This denial represents a final disposition of Mt. Sinai’s appeal. Subsequently, on October 2, 2006, the parties entered into a release agreement, pursuant to which Mt. Sinai agreed to forgo any action whatsoever to continue the litigation against us.both asserted and unasserted.

Contingencies

During the fourth quarter of 2005, a European country commenced a tax audit for the years 2001 to 2004, including an examination of the Company’sour arrangement with professional services companies that provide consulting services to the Company.us. On November 24, 2006, the examining tax authority issued a final assessment in the amount of €4.3 million (equivalent to $5.5 million)$6.2 million at December 31, 2007). No penalty has been included in this assessment. This final assessment has been appealed by the Companyus and the enforcement of the assessment has been suspended until a final determination of the appeal. The Company hasWe have provided a bank guarantee to the tax authority in the amount of the final assessment as required by local law. See Note 3,4,Restricted Cashand Note 19,Guarantees, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At this time, the Company believeswe believe that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is not probable and that the potential amount of any loss cannot be reasonably estimated. The CompanyWe also believesbelieve that the amount of a final assessment, if any, would not be material to the Company’sour financial condition.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.2007.

PART II

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market under the symbol “HSII.” The following table sets forth the high and low stock price per share of the common stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market.

As of February 23, 2007,20, 2008, the last reported price on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market for our common stock was $47.25$30.16 per share and there were approximately 147129 stockholders of record of the common stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not presently anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretionDividends

In September of 2007, our Board of Directors and willapproved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend payment in the amount of $0.13 per share. On an annual basis, the cash dividend is expected to be dependent upon our results$0.52 per share. The first quarterly dividend payment was made on November 16, 2007, to shareholders of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors deemed relevant byrecord as of November 2, 2007, for a total of $2.3 million. In connection with the initiation of a dividend, the Board of Directors. Future indebtednessDirectors also approved the payment of a dividend equivalent on outstanding restricted stock units. The amounts related to the quarterly dividend equivalent for restricted stock units will be accrued over the vesting period and loan facilities may also prohibit or restrict our ability to pay dividends and make distributions to our stockholders.paid upon vesting.

Our second quarterly cash dividend payment in the amount of $0.13 per share was paid on February 15, 2008 to shareholders of record as of February 1, 2008. The dividend payable and related dividend equivalents on outstanding restricted stock units are accrued in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information related to the Company’s purchase of common shares for the quarter ended December 31, 2006.2007. For further information of the Company’s share repurchase activity, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

On September 16, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock under an open market share repurchase authorization with an aggregate purchase price up to $50 million. The Company purchased 1,476,809 shares of the Company’s common stock for $50 million under the September 2005 authorization, which was completed during the second quarter of 2006.

On May 24, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock under an open market share repurchase authorization with an aggregate purchase price up to $50 million. The Company purchased 1,132,073 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the May 2006 authorization, which was completed during the third quarter of 2007.

On May 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate purchase price up to $50 million. The Company intends from time to time as business conditions warrant, to purchase shares of its common stock on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit has been set for completion of this program. A portion of the repurchased shares is intended to offset dilution associated with the Company’s employee equity programs. Through December 31, 2006,2007, the Company has purchased 326,368808,931 shares of the Company’sits common stock for $11.4$30.7 million under the May 20062007 authorization. As of December 31, 2007, $19.3 million of the $50 million stock repurchase authorization remained.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data presented below have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The data as of December 31, 20062007 and 20052006 and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 2005 and 20042005 are derived from the audited historical consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The data as of December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 and for the years ended December 31, 20032004 and 20022003 are derived from audited historical consolidated financial statements that are not included in this report. The data set forth are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the audited consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto, and the other financial data and statistical information included in this Form 10-K.

Notes to Selected Financial Data:

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as other sections of this annual report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecasted or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements include, among other things, our ability to attract and retain qualified executive search consultants; the condition of the economies in the United States, Europe, or elsewhere; social or political instability in markets where we operate; the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; price competition; the ability to forecast, on a quarterly basis, variable compensation accruals that ultimately are determined based on the achievement of annual results; delays or difficulties in integrating Highland Partners search operations; our ability to achieve the planned cost savings from our cost reduction initiatives; our ability to sublease or assign unused office space; our ability to realize our tax loss carryforwards; the timing of anya partial release or full reversal of deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversals;allowance; the mix of profit or loss by country; an impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets; and delays in the development and/or implementation of new technology and systems. For more information on the factors that could affect the outcome of forward-looking statements, see Risk Factors in Item 11A of this Form 10-K. We caution the reader that the list of factors may not be exhaustive. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Executive Overview

Our Business

We are a leading provider of executive search and leadership consulting services. We help our clients build leadership teams by facilitating the recruitment, management and deployment of senior executives for their executive management and board positions. Focusing on top-level services offers us several advantages that include access to and influence with key decision makers, increased potential for recurring search consulting engagements, higher fees per search, enhanced brand visibility, and leveraged global footprint, which create added barriers to entry for potential competitors. Working at the top of client organizations also allows us to attract and retain high-caliber consultants.

In addition to executive search, we provide a range of leadership consulting services to clients. These services include succession planning, top team effectiveness, executive assessment, talent management, executive development, and M&A human capital effectiveness.

We provide our services to a broad range of clients through the expertise of more than 388386 consultants located in 2630 countries throughout the world. Our executive search services are provided on a retained basis. Revenue before reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses (“net revenue”) consists of retainers and indirect expenses billed to clients. Typically, we are paid a retainer for our executive search services equal to approximately one-third of the estimated first year compensation for the position to be filled. In addition, if the actual compensation of a placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation, we often are authorized to bill the client for one-third of the excess. Indirect expenses are calculated as a percentage of the retainer with certain dollar limits per search.

Key Performance Indicators

We manage and assess Heidrick & Struggles’ performance through various means, with the primary financial and operational measures including net revenue growth, operating income, operating margin, consultant headcount, new search confirmation trends, consultant productivity, and average fee per executive search.

Revenue growth is driven by a combination of additional consultants, an increase in executive searches, higher productivity levels and higher average fees per search or service. With the exception of compensation expense, incremental increases in revenue do not necessarily result in proportionate increases in costs, particularly operating and administrative expenses, thus potentially improving operating margins.

The number of consultants, confirmation trends, number of searches completed, productivity levels and the average fee per search will vary from quarter to quarter, affecting revenue growth and operating margin.

Our Compensation Model

Our compensation model closely aligns the interests of our consultants, our Companycompany and our shareholders. Consultants are rewarded for individual performance based on a system that directly ties compensation to the amount of net revenue for which the consultant is responsible. Each quarter, we review and update the expected annual performance and compensation accruals for our consultants. At the group and company level, variable compensation is based, and thus recorded, on our performance against company-widerevenue and regional profitability targets approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and recorded based on the performance of the respective region and the Company as a whole.Directors. As a result, the variable portion of compensation expense may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

In the second quarter of 2005, we adopted a new compensation policy for consultants and management. Under this policy, a portion of consultant and management bonuses are paid in the form of restricted stock units that vest ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant. The amount paid in the form of restricted stock units varies between 10% and 20% (plus a premium of 10% on the shares received) depending on the employee’s level or position. In 2006, the amount paid in the form of restricted stock units increased from 10% to 15% for many employees. The restricted stock units are issued in the quarter following the year in which the performance portion of the awards is earned. Compensation expense related to awards requiring satisfaction of both service and performance conditions is recognized using a graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period which for 2006,2007, began January 1, 20062007 and continues through the final vesting date, which is generally three years from the date of grant. This change in policy was made to better align consultant’sconsultants’ and management’s interestinterests with those of the shareholder.shareholders. In addition, the change will result in increased share ownership for consultants and management.

20062007 Overview

In the third quarter of 2006, our Board of Directors elected L. Kevin Kelly as Chief Executive Officer and appointed him as a director of the Company. Mr. Kelly has held various positions within the Company since 1997, most recently as President of Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA) and Asia Pacific. The prior Chairman and CEO, Thomas J. Friel, who previously announced in June 2006 his intention to transition out of the CEO role, has become non-executive Chairman of the Board.

In January of 2007, John Hawkins joined Heidrick & Struggles as Regional Managing Partner of the Americas, with responsibility for the firm’s U.S., Canadian and Latin American operations. Mr. Hawkins joins Heidrick & Struggles from MedPointe Inc., a New Jersey-based specialty pharmaceuticals company that he co-founded through the 2001 leveraged buyout of Carter-Wallace, Inc., a NYSE-listed multinational consumer/health care concern. At MedPointe, he served as Executive Vice President of Corporate Development and External Affairs and also was a member of both the Executive and Management Committees. Prior to that, he held numerous leadership roles at Russell Reynolds Associates, including Managing Director and Leader of both the Global Health Care Sector and the Global Board of Directors/CEO practice.

David Peters assumed the role of Regional Managing Partner of EMEA and Gerry Davis assumed the role of Regional Managing Partner of Asia Pacific. In conjunction with the appointment of these two regional managing partners, Jeff R. Scherb, who as Chief Technology and Operations Officer, was assisting Mr. Kelly in running both EMEA and Asia Pacific, retired from the Company at year end.

In October of 2006, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Highland Partners, a leading retained executive search boutique and a division of Hudson Highland Group, Inc., through an asset

purchase funded from existing cash for $36.0 million including $1.2 million of capitalized acquisition costs. Hudson Highland Group will also be eligible to receive earnout payments of up to $15.0 million based on the acquired consultants achieving certain revenue metrics in 2007 and 2008. The total purchase price, including the $36.6 million paid at closing and the 2007 and 2008 earnout payments will not exceed $51.6 million. All 48 of the Highland Partners consultants who were offered employment by us have accepted and joined our Company.

Consolidated net revenue increased 16.1%29.5%, or $66.2$141.1 million in 2006,2007, compared to 2005. Net2006. The first nine months of 2007 includes net revenue includes $13.7of approximately $46 million associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants.consultants, which were acquired on October 2, 2006. Double-digit percentage revenue increases were reported in 20062007 in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. The Financial Services, Consumer,Industrial, and IndustrialHealth Care/Life Sciences industry groups were the largest contributors to year-over-year revenue growth. Consultant productivity measured by average revenue per executive search consultant remained atincreased to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, consistent with2006. The average fee per executive search was $114,900 for the year ended December 31, 2005.2007 compared to $101,100 for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Operating income as a percentage of net revenue increased to 12.8% in 2007 from 10.5% in 2006 from 5.2% in 2005 primarily as a result of lower restructuring chargesan increase in 2006.net revenue in 2007 of 29.5%. Salaries and employee benefits expense as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 68.7% in 2006 to 67.6% in 2007, and general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 20.8% in 2006 to 19.6% in 2007.

We ended the year with a strong cash and short-term investment balance of $220.8$282.9 million, an increase of $17.1$62.1 million, compared to $203.7$220.8 million at December 31, 2005.2006. The increase in year-over-year ending cash and short-term investment balances primarily reflects the decision in early 2006 to consolidate the two bonus payments made to consultants into one payment to be paid in the first quarter following the year in which the bonus is earned, along with increased cash flows from operations. This increase was partially offset byIn early 2008, we expect to pay approximately $150 million related to the 2007 bonus accruals.

In September of 2007, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend payment in the amount of $0.13 per share. On an annual basis, the cash useddividend is expected to acquire substantially allbe $0.52 per share. The first quarterly dividend payment was made on November 16, 2007 to shareholders of record as of November 2, 2007 for a total of $2.3 million. The second quarterly dividend was paid on February 15, 2008 to shareholders of record at the assetsclose of Highland Partners and repurchases of our common stock.business on February 1, 2008.

20072008 Outlook

For 2007,In 2008, we expect to achieve net revenue of between $560 million$650 and $580$670 million, representing growth over 2006 net revenue of between 17%5% and 21%.8% over 2007 net revenue. We are targeting to achieve a 20072008 full-year operating margin of approximately 13%. Net income and earnings per share in 2008 are expected to reflect a full-year effective tax rate of between 42%38 percent and 48% primarily due to certain one-time costs associated with tax planning initiatives. In addition, quarterly42 percent. Quarterly and full-year tax rate estimates can be significantly impacted by country-level results and can also vary significantly by reporting period as well as bya result of discrete items that require immediate recognition in a particular quarter. WeIn 2008, we intend to incorporate additional branches which will continue to pursue additional means byhave a discrete impact in the quarter in which tothey are incorporated, but will lower thisthe effective tax rate estimate.

Results of Operations

We operate our executive search and leadership consulting services in three geographic regions: the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

For segment purposes, reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses classified as revenue are reported separately and therefore are not included in the net revenue by geographic region. We believe that analyzing trends in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue) and analyzing operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue more appropriately reflects our core operations.

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, the results of operations (in thousands):

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, our selected statements of operations data as a percentage of revenue before reimbursements (net revenue):

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our revenue and operating income by segment (in thousands):

2007 Compared to 2006

Total revenue.    Consolidated total revenue increased $146.3 million, or 29.1%, to $648.3 million in 2007 from $502.0 million in 2006. The increase in total revenue was due primarily to the increase in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).

Revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).    Consolidated net revenue increased $141.1 million, or 29.5%, to $619.7 million in 2007 from $478.5 million in 2006. Net revenue increased across all regions in 2007. Strong results from the Financial Services, Industrial and Health Care/Life Sciences industry groups contributed to the year over year revenue growth in 2007 as compared to 2006. In 2007, the number of confirmed executive searches increased 15% to 5,102 from 4,447 in 2006. We believe this increase reflects our success in winning business and the successful integration of former Highland Partners consultants. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in revenue in 2007 of approximately 5 percentage points year over year.

Net revenue in the Americas was $333.6 million in 2007, an increase of $68.1 million, or 25.7%, from $265.4 million in 2006. The Health Care/Life Sciences, Professional Services and Industrial industry groups realized the largest year-over-year revenue growth in 2007. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations in Canada and Latin America contributed to less than one percentage point of revenue growth in 2007. Net revenue in Europe was $207.5 million in 2007, an increase of $43.9 million, or 26.8%, from $163.6 million in 2006. The year-over-year revenue growth in 2007 was driven by especially strong results in the Industrial, Financial Services and Consumer industry groups. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in net revenue of approximately 10 percentage points in 2007. In Asia Pacific, net revenue was $78.6 million in 2007, an increase of $29.1 million, or 58.8%, from $49.5 million in 2006. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in revenue of approximately 8 percentage points year over year. Business was strong across the region with significant revenue contribution from the Financial Services, Industrial and Consumer industry groups.

Salaries and employee benefits.    Consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense increased $90.2 million, or 27.5%, to $419.0 million in 2007 from $328.7 million in 2006. Fixed salaries and employee benefits expense increased $44.5 million and performance-related compensation expense increased $45.7 million. Fixed salaries and employee benefits expense includes stock-based compensation expense earned under prior year equity awards requiring satisfaction of both service and performance conditions.

During the third quarter of 2006, we revised our policy relating to the vesting of certain restricted stock units upon the eligible retirement of employees that hold such awards. This policy revision constituted a modification of those equity awards. According to the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), we are required to recognize the original grant date fair value compensation cost over an accelerated service period (through the earliest date each equity award holder is eligible to retire) for those awards affected by the modification. During 2006, we recorded an additional $2.7 million of non-cash compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of these restricted stock unit awards.

Fixed salaries and employee benefits expense increased $44.5 million or 19.9% in 2007 compared to 2006. Fixed cash-based compensation expense increased $41.9 million in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to a 15.2% increase in average consultant headcount and higher year over year base salaries for existing consultants. In addition, 2007 includes an additional $1.9 million of amortization expense related to Highland Partner retention awards, offset by $4.4 million of additional severance related costs in 2006 associated with a realignment of management responsibilities for the new CEO’s senior team and a realignment of management in Germany. Fixed stock-based compensation expense increased $2.6 million in 2007 compared to 2006 due in part to approximately $1.2 million of additional expense recorded in the second quarter of 2007 associated with the continued vesting of all outstanding unvested equity awards for Thomas J. Friel, who retired as chairman in May 2007. Fixed stock-based compensation expense also increased due to a higher number of restricted stock units granted to retain our largest revenue producers partially offset by increased forfeitures during 2007. Stock option expense decreased by $0.7 million in 2007 compared to 2006 as a result of Company granting fewer options in 2007 versus prior years and the vesting of previously granted options.

Performance-related compensation expense increased $45.7 million in 2007 compared to 2006 as a result of higher net revenue levels and increased average consultant headcount.

Salaries and employee benefits expense as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 68.7% in 2006 to 67.6% in 2007.

Excluding a negative impact of $12.7 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, which management believes provides a better comparison of operational performance, consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense increased approximately 23.6% compared to 2006.

General and administrative expenses.    Consolidated general and administrative expenses increased $21.8 million, or 22.0%, to $121.2 million in 2007 from $99.4 million in 2006. Fees for professional services increased $10.4 million of which $2.7 million relates to legal costs incurred for litigation related to our hiring of certain Whitney Group consultants in the Asia Pacific region, $2.1 million relates to certain consulting assignments in Europe which required third party expertise and $5.6 million of other fees for professional services. In 2007, general and administrative expenses were also higher due to an additional $2.5 million of expense related to the worldwide consultants’ meeting held in the second quarter of 2007 and $1.5 million of expense associated with our acquisition of Highland Partners, including the amortization of intangible assets and costs related to the transitional services agreement. In the Americas, one of the remaining two principal consultants from our 2000 acquisition of the executive search company, Lynch Miller Moore O’Hara, Inc., retired from the Company triggering the review of the remaining client relationship intangible asset and resulted in an impairment charge of $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2007. Premise-related costs increased by $4.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006 due to new offices and new lease agreements for existing offices. Other operating and infrastructure expenses increased $1.6 million.

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased from 20.8% in 2006 to 19.6% in 2007.

Excluding a negative impact of $4.0 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, which management believes provides a better comparison of operational performance, consolidated general and administrative expenses increased approximately 18% compared to 2006.

Operating income.    Our consolidated operating income was $79.5 million in 2007 compared to $50.0 million in 2006 an increase of 58.9%. The increase in consolidated operating income was primarily due to higher net revenue and improved profitability, decreased restructuring charges and cost control, partially offset by increased operating expenses.

In the Americas, operating income increased to $67.5 million in 2007 from $53.9 million in 2006. The increase is the result of year over year increased net revenue of $68.1 million offset by higher salaries and employee benefits expense of $46.3 million, and general and administrative expenses of $8.2 million. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense is primarily a result of increased expenses associated with higher net revenue levels. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $8.2 million is due to $2.6 million in premise-related costs due to new lease agreements for existing offices, the impairment of intangible assets related to the acquisition of the executive search firm, Lynch Miller Moore O’Hara, Inc., of $1.0 million, $1.5 million due to increased practice and business development related spending and $3.1 million of increased other operating and infrastructure expenses.

In Europe, operating income increased $17.0 million in 2007, to $31.9 million, from $14.9 million in 2006. The increase in operating income was a result of higher net revenue of $43.9 million offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits expense of $23.3 million and general and administrative expenses of $3.6 million. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense is primarily a result of a 5.2% increase in headcount over last year offset by $2.9 million in severance costs associated with a realignment of management in Germany in 2006. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to additional professional services fees of $2.7 million of which $2.1 million relates to certain consulting arrangements which required third party expertise and $1.5 million in premise-related costs due to new offices and new lease agreements for existing offices and depreciation expense.

In Asia Pacific, operating income was $15.9 million in 2007, an increase of $2.6 million, compared to $13.3 million in 2006. The increase in operating income was a result of higher net revenue of $29.1 million offset by an increase of $19.7 million of salaries and employee benefits expense and $6.8 million of general and administrative expenses. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense was primarily a result of a 36.9% increase in headcount in 2007 compared to 2006. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to legal costs in the 2007 third and fourth quarters of $2.7 million incurred for litigation related to our hiring of certain Whitney Group consultants in the region, $1.7 million in premise-related costs due to new offices and new lease agreements for existing offices and $1.3 million in additional professional services fees.

Corporate expenses increased $4.2 million in 2007, to $35.8 million from $31.6 million in 2006. The increase is due to increases of $1.0 million in salaries and employee benefits expense and $3.2 million in general and administrative expenses. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense is primarily due to a charge of approximately $1.2 million associated with the continued vesting of all outstanding unvested equity awards for Thomas J. Friel, who retired as chairman in May 2007 offset by a decrease in other salaries and employee benefits expense due to severance expense recorded in 2006. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increases of $2.5 million related to the worldwide consultants’ meeting, and $3.2 million in fees for professional services offset by a year over year decrease in expenses associated with our acquisition of Highland Partners, including costs related to the transitional service agreement.

In 2007, there were no restructuring charges taken. In 2006, we revised our estimates related to previous restructuring initiatives and recorded an additional charge of $0.4 million related to property reserves. Cash outlays in 2007 related to restructuring charges accrued at December 31, 2006 were $3.3 million. The remaining accrued restructuring charges of $9.5 million at December 31, 2007 related entirely to real estate are expected to be paid over the remaining lease terms of vacated properties.

Net non-operating income.    Primarily due to higher cash balances and higher returns on invested cash, net non-operating income increased $2.4 million in 2007 to $7.6 million compared to $5.2 million in 2006.

Net interest income in 2007 increased $1.8 million to $8.1 million primarily due to higher cash balances and higher returns on invested cash.

Net other non-operating expense was $0.3 million in 2007, compared to net other non-operating expense of $1.6 million in 2006. In the third quarter of 2007, we became aware of certain revaluation amounts included in various balance sheet accounts, primarily in the Asia Pacific region, that were not properly stated in prior years. As a result of adjusting these revaluation amounts, we recorded an exchange loss of $0.8 million in the third quarter of 2007. Other non-operating income (expense) consists primarily of exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and are not considered permanent in nature.

Income taxes.    In 2007, we reported income before taxes of $87.1 million and recorded an income tax provision of $30.7 million. The effective tax rate for 2007 was 35.2%. This rate reflects a benefit of $7.3 million associated with the reversal of valuation allowance on foreign tax credits.

In 2006, we reported income before taxes of $55.3 million and recorded an income tax provision of $21.0 million. The effective tax rate for 2006 was 38.0%. This rate reflects a net benefit of $1.6 million from the correction of prior year misstatements associated with refund opportunities for past taxes paid in the U.S. taxing jurisdiction.

2006 Compared to 2005

Total revenue.    Consolidated total revenue increased $69.1 million, or 16.0%, to $502.0 million in 2006 from $432.9 million in 2005. The increase in total revenue was due primarily to the increase in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).

Revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).    Consolidated net revenue increased $66.2 million, or 16.1%, to $478.5 million in 2006 from $412.3 million in 2005. Net revenue in 2006 includes $13.7 million associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants since the acquisition on October 2, 2006. Net revenue increased across all regions in 2006. The Financial Services, Consumer, and Industrial industry groups contributed to the increase in net revenue in 2006 as compared to 2005. In 2006, the number of confirmed executive searches increased 9.1% to 4,447 from 4,077 in 2005. We believe this increase reflects2005 as a result of the impact of moderate economic improvement in the global economy, our success in winning business and our acquisition of Highland Partners. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in revenue in 2006 of less than one percentage point year over year.

Net revenue in the Americas was $265.4 million in 2006, an increase of $26.8 million, or 11.2%, from $238.6 million in 2005. Net revenue in 2006 includes $10.9 million associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants since the acquisition date of October 2, 2006. The Financial Services, Consumer and Industrial industry groups were the largest contributors to revenue in 2006. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations in Canada and Latin America contributed to less than one percentage point of revenue growth in 2006. Net revenue in Europe was $163.6 million in 2006, an increase of $29.3 million, or 21.9%, from $134.3 million in 2005. Net revenue in 2006 includes $2.3 million associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants since October 2, 2006. The increase in net revenue over 2005 was driven by strong results in the Financial Services, Consumer, Health CareCare/Life Sciences and Industrial industry groups. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in net revenue of 1.5 percentage points in 2006. In Asia Pacific, net revenue was $49.5 million in 2006, an increase of $10.0 million, or 25.4%, from $39.5 million in 2005. Net revenue in 2006 includes $0.5 million associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants since the acquisition on October 2, 2006. The negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a decrease in revenue of less than one percentage point year over year. Most industry groups experienced significant net revenue growth in 2006 as compared to the prior year.

Salaries and employee benefits.    Consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense increased $54.8 million, or 20.0%, to $328.7 million in 2006 from $273.9 million in 2005. Fixed salaries and employee benefits increased $40.7 million and performance-related compensation expense increased $14.1 million. Fixed salaries and employee benefits expense includes stock-based compensation expense earned under prior year equity awards requiring satisfaction of both service and performance conditions.

During the third quarter of 2006, we revised our policy relating to the vesting of certain restricted stock units upon the eligible retirement of employees that hold such awards. This policy revision constitutesconstituted a modification of those equity awards. According to the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), we are required to recognize the original grant date fair value compensation cost over an accelerated service period (through the earliest date each equity award holder is eligible to retire) for those awards affected by the modification. During 2006, we recorded an additional $2.7 million of non-cash compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of these restricted stock unit awards.

Fixed salaries and employee benefits expense increased $40.7 million in 2006 compared to 2005, of which $6.7 million is associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants. The remaining increase was primarily attributable to a 10% increase in headcount year over year, a $8.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and $5.3 million of severance costs associated with a realignment of management responsibilities for the new CEO’s senior team and a realignment of management in Germany. Of the increase in stock-based compensation, $5.3 million relates to an increase in the number of outstanding restricted stock units and more accelerated vesting of the units as compared to the prior year, and $2.7 million relatedrelates to stock option expense now recorded in earnings under a new accounting standard.

Performance-related compensation expense increased $14.1 million, of which $4.9 million is associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants. The remaining increase is primarily the result of the increase in the number of consultants added during the last year2006 and increased net revenue. The accelerated vesting of certain restricted

stock unit awards in 2006 increased performance-based compensation expense by $1.3 million. Also, in 2006, the amount of certain consultant and management bonuses paid in the form of restricted stock units increased from an average of 10% to 15%. Compensation expense related to restricted stock units is recognized over a longer period (the service period of the equity award) as compared to cash compensation which is expensed entirely in the period in which the related services are performed. Therefore, as a result of increasing the amount of bonuses paid in the form of restricted stock units, compensation expense decreased $3.3 million in 2006 as compared to 2005.

The negative impact of exchange rates on consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense was less than one percentage point year over year.

General and administrative expenses.    Consolidated general and administrative expenses increased $5.0 million, or 5.3%, to $99.4 million in 2006 from $94.4 million in 2005. Of this increase, $3.0 million is associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants. The remaining increase of $2.0 million is related to operating expenses associated with higher net revenue levels and higher discretionary spending including $0.9 million in travel costs, $0.8 million related to marketing and business development activities and $1.3 million in fees for professional services, partially offset by lower depreciation and premise-related costs of $0.5 million. Also, 2005 included a $0.5 million favorable settlement of an insurance claim.

Operating income.    Our consolidated operating income was $50.0 million in 2006 compared to $21.5 million in 2005. The following table summarizes our consolidated operating income for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

The increase in the consolidated operating income was primarily due to improved net revenue and profitability in the geographic regions and decreased restructuring charges, partially offset by increased operating expenses.

In the Americas, operating income increased to $53.9 million in 2006 from $50.4 million in 2005. Of this $3.5 million increase in operating income, $1.7 million is associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants. The remaining increase in operating income of $1.8 million is the result of year over year increased net revenue of $15.9 million offset by higher salaries and employee benefits expense of $16.3 million, and lower general and administrative expenses of $2.2 million. The increase in salaries and employee benefitbenefits expense is primarily as a result of a 27.2% increase in headcount over last year and $1.9 million related to the accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock unit awards. The decrease in general and administrative expenseexpenses of $2.2 million is a result of lower discretionary spending of $1.0 million, premise-related costs of $0.8 million and bad debt expense of $0.4 million.

In Europe, operating income increased $7.2 million in 2006, to $14.9 million, from $7.7 million in 2005. Although the former Highland Partners consultants added $2.3 million of net revenue in 2006, the impact on

operating income was negligible. Excluding the results associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants, the increase in net revenue of $27.0 million was offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits expense of $18.1 million and general and administrative expenses of $1.7 million. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense is primarily a result of a 7.8% increase in headcount over last year and $2.9 million in severance costs associated with a realignment of management in Germany.

In Asia Pacific, operating income was $13.3 million, an increase of $2.9 million, compared to $10.4 million in 2005. The increase in net revenue of $10.0 million was offset by an increase of $5.7 million of salaries and employee benefits expense and $1.3 million of general and administrative expenses.

Corporate expenses increased $7.2 million in 2006, to $31.6 million from $24.4 million in 2005. Of this increase, $2.4 million relates to costs associated with former Highland Partners’ consultants, the majority of which relate to integration costs and fees incurred under a transitional service agreement with the former owner. The remaining increase of $4.8 million was primarily the result of increased fixed salaries and employee benefits expense of $2.0 million due to increased headcount and increased stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock unit awards. Also included in 2006 is $1.1 million of severance, $0.8 million of stock option expense now recorded in earnings under a new accounting standard and $0.5 million related to the accelerated

vesting of certain restricted stock unit awards. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million year over year.

Restructuring charges were $0.4 million and $22.5 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash outlays in 2006During 2005, we began initiatives to improve operating performance and increase operating margin. These initiatives focused primarily on Europe and included charges of $14.1 million for severance and other employee-related costs related to reductions in workforce and $8.4 million related to the consolidation of office space. The workforce reduction affected 57 employees, primarily in Europe, and included 15 executive search consultants. Included in the office-related charge of $8.4 million is the reversal of $1.0 million of restructuring charges accrued at December 31, 2005 were $7.1 million. The remaining accrued restructuring chargesaccruals, which originated in a prior year, related to a renegotiated lease for one of $12.7 million at December 31, 2006 are expected to be paid over the remaining lease terms of vacated properties.our search offices.

Net non-operating income.    Net non-operating income was $5.2 million in 2006, compared to $7.0 million in 2005.

Net interest income in 2006 increased $0.7 million to $6.3 million primarily due to higher cash balances and higher investment returns on the invested cash.

During 2006, we recognized $0.6 million of realized gains and $0.1 million of unrealized losses, net of the consultants’ share of the gains (losses) and other costs, related to our equity and warrant portfolio. During 2005, we recognized $1.0 million of realized gains and $1.0 million of unrealized losses, net of the consultants’ share of the gains (losses) and other costs, related to our equity and warrant portfolio.

Net other non-operating expense was $1.6 million in 2006, compared to net other non-operating income of $1.4 million in 2005. Other non-operating income (expense) consists primarily of exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and are not considered permanent in nature.

Income taxes.    In 2006, we reported income before taxes of $55.3 million and recorded an income tax provision of $21.0 million. The effective tax rate for 2006 was 38.0%. This rate reflects a net benefit of $1.6 million from the correction of prior year misstatements associated with refund opportunities for past taxes paid in the U.S. taxing jurisdiction.

In 2005, we reported income before taxes of $28.5 million and recorded an income tax benefit of $10.7 million. An income tax benefit was recorded despite reportingrecording income before taxes because the valuation allowance was reduced throughout the year as tax deductions related to deferred tax assets were used to reduce current taxable income, significantly reducing the federal and state income tax provision. Also, the total annual effective tax benefit rate was substantially impacted by additional discrete reversals of portions of the tax valuation allowance established in 2003 against net deferred tax assets. In recent years, we began generating pre-tax book income on a consistent basis and expect to continue to do so. Under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” a company must continually evaluate the need for a valuation allowance and reduce the allowance when it is more likely than

not that some or all of the associated benefits of the deferred tax assets will be utilized. In 2005, we concluded it was more likely than not that a majority of our U.S. deferred tax assets would be recoverable and, as a result, reversed $24.6 million of the valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets.

2005 Compared to 2004

Total revenue.    Consolidated total revenue increased $34.7 million, or 8.7%, to $432.9 million in 2005 from $398.2 million in 2004. The increase in total revenue was due primarily to the increase in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).

Revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).    Consolidated net revenue increased $36.9 million, or 9.8%, to $412.3 million in 2005 from $375.4 million in 2004. Net revenue increased across all regions in 2005. All of our industry groups experienced increases in net revenue, with the exception of the Health Care practice which had a modest decline. In 2005, the number of confirmed executive searches increased 3% to 4,077 from 3,975 in 2004. We believe this increase reflects the impact of moderate economic improvement in the global economy and our success in winning business. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations was less than one percentage point.

Net revenue in the Americas was $238.6 million in 2005, an increase of $24.2 million, or 11.3%, from $214.4 million in 2004. All of our industry groups experienced increases in net revenue, with the exception of the Health Care practice. Excluding a positive impact of $1.7 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, a comparison which management believes provides a better indication of operational performance, net revenue in the Americas increased approximately 10% compared to 2004. Net revenue in Europe was $134.3 million in 2005, an increase of $5.0 million, or 3.8%, from $129.3 million in 2004. All of the industry groups experienced increases in net revenue, with the exception of the Consumer and Higher Education/Nonprofit groups which had modest declines. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations was less than one percentage point. In Asia Pacific, net revenue was $39.4 million in 2005, an increase of $7.7 million, or 24.5%, from $31.7 million in 2004. Net revenue increased across all groups in 2005, with the exception of the Professional Services and Higher Education/Nonprofit industry groups. Excluding a positive impact of $0.6 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, Asia Pacific’s net revenue increased approximately 22% compared to 2004.

Salaries and employee benefits.    Consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense increased $22.7 million, or 9.1%, to $273.9 million in 2005 from $251.2 million in 2004. Fixed salaries and employee benefits increased $11.8 million and performance-related compensation expense increased $10.9 million. The increase in fixed salaries and employee benefits expense of $11.8 million was primarily attributable to a 3% increase in average consultant headcount year over year. Also, fixed stock-based compensation expense was higher by $8.5 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 primarily as a result of the restricted stock units granted in the first quarter of 2005. The net expense related to our German pension plan decreased $2.1 million in 2005. See Note 11,Pension Plan and Life Insurance Contract, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Performance-related compensation expense increased $10.9 million in 2005 compared to 2004 primarily as a result of increased net revenue. We adopted a new compensation policy in 2005 whereby between 10% and 20% of consultant and management bonuses will be paid in the form of restricted stock units that vest ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant. Compensation expense related to these restricted stock units is recognized over the service period which, for 2005, is considered to have begun on January 1, 2005 as bonuses are earned through the final vesting date three years from the date of grant. This resulted in a deferral of $6.1 million of compensation expense from 2005 bonus awards as compared to 2004, during which 100% of the annual bonus was being recognized in that fiscal year as it was paid entirely in cash.

Excluding a negative impact of $1.4 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, a comparison which management believes provides a better indication of operational performance, consolidated salaries and employee benefits increased approximately 9% in 2005 compared to 2004.

As a percentage of net revenue, salaries and employee benefits expense was 66.4% in 2005, compared to 66.9% in 2004.

General and administrative expenses.    Consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased $2.1 million, or 2.2%, to $94.4 million in 2005 from $96.5 million in 2004. An increase of $5.1 million in operating expenses associated with higher net revenue levels and discretionary spending related to marketing and business development activities was offset by certain expenses recorded in 2004 that did not recur in 2005. Among these items are the costs associated with the worldwide partners meeting that was held in 2004. Also, we recorded $1.3 million of legal settlement costs in 2004, of which $0.5 million was later determined to be covered by our insurance carrier and reimbursed to us in 2005. In addition, bad debt expense was $0.8 million in 2005 compared to a net reduction in expense of $0.7 million in 2004 resulting in a net increase of $1.5 million year over year. The net reduction in bad debt expense in 2004 is related to an adjustment recorded to the allowance for doubtful accounts based on favorable collection experience. Depreciation expense decreased $1.9 million in 2005 along with a decrease of $2.7 million of other infrastructure costs. The negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations on general and administrative expenses was less than one percentage point.

As a percentage of net revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased to 22.9% in 2005 from 25.7% in 2004.

Reimbursed expenses.    We incur certain out-of-pocket expenses that are reimbursed by our clients. Historically, we have not established a receivable for reimbursable expenses incurred but not yet billed as the amount was determined to be immaterial. During the fourth quarter of 2004, we enhanced our estimation technique related to reimbursable expenses resulting in a non-recurring favorable impact to operating income of $1.5 million.

We have accounted for this as a change in accounting estimate. This change in accounting estimate did not have a significant impact on our 2005 results of operations and is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations in future periods.

Restructuring charges.    During 2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $22.5 million. These initiatives focused primarily on Europe and included charges of $14.1 million for severance and other employee-related costs related to reductions in workforce and $8.4 million related to the consolidation of office space. The workforce reduction affected 57 employees, primarily in Europe, and included 15 executive search consultants Included in the office related charge of $8.4 million is the reversal of $1.0 million of restructuring accruals, which originated in a prior year, related to a renegotiated lease for one of our search offices. By segment, the restructuring charges recorded in 2005 are $1.1 million in the Americas, $19.3 million in Europe and $2.1 million in Corporate.

During the fourth quarter of 2004, we adjusted our restructuring accruals and recorded $0.6 million of restructuring charges to reflect changes in lease estimates primarily due to a tenant default on a sublease and the final determination and payment of certain severance-related restructuring accruals.

Operating income.    Our consolidated operating income was $21.5 million in 2005 compared to $28.7 million in 2004. The following table summarizes our consolidated operating income for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively:

The decrease in the consolidated operating income was primarily due to improved net revenue and profitability in the geographic regions offset by increased restructuring charges.

In the Americas, operating income in 2005 increased $3.5 million to $50.4 million from $46.9 million in 2004. As net revenue increased by $24.2 million, salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $16.7 million. Fixed salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $12.7 million primarily as a result of higher stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units granted in the first quarter of 2005. Performance-related compensation expense increased $4.0 million primarily as a result of increased net revenue. In addition, we adopted a new compensation policy in 2005 whereby between 10% and 20% of consultant and management bonuses will be paid in the form of restricted stock units that vest ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant. The restricted stock units will be issued in the month of March following the year in which the bonuses are earned. Compensation expense related to these restricted stock units is recognized over the service period which, for 2005, is considered to have begun on January 1, 2005 as bonuses are earned through the final vesting date three years from the date of grant. This resulted in a $4.1 million reduction in compensation expense in 2005 as compared to 2004, during which 100% of the annual bonus expense was being recognized in that fiscal year. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $4.0 million is a result of higher discretionary spending of $3.7 million offset by a $1.5 million of lower infrastructure expenses. In addition, bad debt expense was $0.7 million in 2005 compared to a net reduction in expense of $1.1 million in 2004 resulting in a net increase of $1.8 million year over year. The net reduction in bad debt expense in 2004 is related to an adjustment recorded to the allowance for doubtful accounts based on favorable collection experience.

In Europe, operating income was $7.6 million in 2005 compared to $3.6 million in 2004. The increase in net revenue of $5.0 million, lower general and administrative expenses of $1.8 million, and lower fixed salaries and employee benefits expense of $3.1 million, were offset by an increase of $5.8 million of performance-related compensation General and administrative expenses were also lower by $1.8 million in 2005 primarily as a result of $1.3 million of legal settlement costs relating to a claim arising from certain professional services provided by one of our consultants to a client that was recorded in 2005, of which $0.5 million was later determined to be covered by our insurance carrier and reimbursed to us in 2005.

In Asia Pacific, operating income in 2005 was $10.4 million, an increase of $4.1 million, compared to $6.3 million in 2004. The increase in net revenue of $7.7 million was partially offset by increases of $3.2 million of salaries and employee benefits expense and $0.4 million of general and administrative expenses.

Corporate expenses decreased $3.2 million, or 11.4%, to $24.4 million in 2005 from $27.6 million in 2004. The decrease in corporate expenses was primarily due to lower general and administrative expenses including $1.4 million of lower infrastructure expenses and costs related to the our worldwide partner meeting that was held in 2004 but did not recur in 2005.

Restructuring charges were $22.5 million and $0.6 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The restructuring charges are explained above in the section captioned,Restructuring charges.

Net non-operating income.    Net non-operating income was $7.0 million in 2005, compared to $58.4 million in 2004.

Net interest income in 2005 increased $3.4 million to $6.0 million primarily due to higher cash balances and higher investment returns on the invested cash.

During 2005, we recognized $1.0 million of realized gains and $1.0 million of unrealized losses, net of the consultants’ share of the gains (losses) and other costs, related to our equity and warrant portfolio. During 2004, we recognized a realized gain of $57.0 million, net of the consultants’ share of the gains and other costs, related to our equity and warrant portfolio, including $56.8 million related to the monetization of our shares of common stock of Google. For further information on this monetization, see Note 16,Significant Warrant Monetization, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net other non-operating income was $1.4 million in 2005, compared to net other non-operating expense of $1.0 million in 2004. Other non-operating income (expense) consists primarily of exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and are not considered permanent in nature.

Income taxes.    In 2005, we reported income before taxes of $28.5 million and recorded an income tax benefit of $10.7 million. An income tax benefit was recorded despite reporting income before taxes because the valuation allowance was reduced throughout the year as tax deductions related to deferred tax assets were used to reduce current taxable income, significantly reducing federal and state income tax provision for the current year. Also, the total annual effective tax benefit rate was substantially impacted by additional discrete reversals of portions of the tax valuation allowance established in 2003 against net deferred tax assets. In recent years, we began generating pre-tax book income on a consistent basis and expect to continue to do so. Under SFAS No. 109,No.109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” a company must continually evaluate the need for a valuation allowance and reduce the allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all of the associated benefits of the deferred tax assets will be utilized. In 2005, we concluded it was more likely than not that a majority of our U.S. deferred tax assets would be recoverable and, as a result, reversed $24.6 million of the valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets.

In 2004, as a result of a significant warrant monetization in the third quarter of 2004, we determined that a lesser valuation allowance was required relating to our net deferred tax assets associated with tax deductions that will be available for carryback to recover taxes paid in 2004 and recorded a $28.5 million reduction to the income tax expense and the valuation allowance.

In 2004, the effective tax rate was 5.5%, which is significantly lower than the statutory rate, primarily as a result of the partial reduction of the previously recorded valuation allowance relating to net deferred tax assets associated with tax deductions that will be available for carryback to recover taxes paid in 2004 and the utilization of net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General.    We continually evaluate our liquidity requirements, capital needs and availability of capital resources based on our operating needs. We believe that our existing cash balances and short-term investments together with the funds expected to be generated from operations and funds available under our committed revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our operations for the foreseeable future, as well as to finance the cash payments associated with our restructuring charges, and stock repurchase program.program and cash dividends. Our ability to undertake major acquisitions may depend, in part, on access to additional funds.

We historically have

Prior to 2006, we paid a portion of our bonuses in December and the remainder in March. ForAs part of our normal bonus program, for the 2006 bonus year and going forward, we paid and expect to pay mostall bonuses in the first quarter following the year in which they wereare earned. Employee bonuses are accrued throughout the year and are based on our performance and the performance of the individual employee.

We do not have material off-balance sheet arrangements, special purpose entities, trading activities of non-exchange traded contracts or transactions with related parties. In the ordinary course of business, we have at times performed executive search services for certain related parties that are considered immaterial in nature and amount and have been consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms-length transactions.

Lines of credit.    During 2005 and 2006, we had a $60.0 million committed unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Facility”“Old Facility”). Under the Old Facility, we could borrow U.S. dollars, euros, sterling and other major traded currencies, as agreed by the banks. Borrowings under the Old Facility bearbore interest at the existing Alternate Base Rate or LIBOR plus a margin as determined by our compliance with certain tests of financial condition. The Old Facility setsset limits on our ability to make acquisitions without bank approval and to incur additional debt outside of the Old Facility. We paid a facility fee whether or not the Old Facility was used during the year.

In October 2006, we terminated the Old Facility and replaced it with a new $100 million committed unsecured revolving facility (the “New Facility”). Under the New Facility, we may borrow U.S. dollars, euros, or other major traded currencies as agreed by the banks. Borrowings under the New Facility bear interest at the existing Alternate Base Rate or LIBOR plus a spread as determined by our leverage ratio. The New Facility has more favorable terms, including increased flexibility with regard to potential acquisitions, and lower costs than the terminated facility.Old Facility that we terminated. A facility fee is charged even if no portion of the New Facility is used. The New Facility expires in October 2011.

There were no borrowings outstanding under the lines of credit existing at December 31, 20062007 or December 31, 2005,2006, nor were there any borrowings during the years ended December 31, 20062007 and 2005,2006, respectively, under the then existing lines of credit. At December 31, 2005During 2006 and through September 30, 2006, we were not in default of the financial covenants of the Facility. At December 31, 2006,2007, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the New Facility,revolving credit facility in effect during those respective years and no event of default existed.

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.    Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at December 31, 20062007 were $220.8$282.9 million, an increase of $17.1$62.1 million, compared to $203.7$220.8 million at December 31, 2005.2006. In 2006, we paid $36.0 million, including $1.2 million ofin capitalized acquisition costs, to acquire substantially all of the assets of Highland Partners. We expect to pay approximately $150 million in bonuses in early 2008. In December 2006, we entered into a bank guarantee in the amount of $7.9 million with regard to a tax assessment in a European country. Thiscountry and increased the amount hasto $8.3 million during 2007 due to foreign currency fluctuations. These amounts have been classified as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and reducesreduce the cash balancebalances reported at December 31, 2007 and 2006. Refer to Note 3,4,Restricted Cashin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash from operating activities.    In 2007, cash provided by operating activities was $105.8 million, principally reflecting our increase in net income plus an increase in bonus related accruals and other non-cash charges, less the payment of cash bonuses of approximately $98 million in March 2007.

In 2006, cash provided by operating activities was $99.8 million, principally reflecting our net income plus an increase in bonus related accruals and other non-cash charges partially offset by an increase in trade receivables related to higher 2006 revenues. In 2006, to better assess full year Company performance before paying bonuses, we consolidated our two bonus payments made to consultants into one payment to be paid in the first quarter following the year in which the bonus was earned. In prior years, part of the annual bonus was paid to consultants in December.

In 2005, cash provided by operating activities was $33.4 million, primarily as a result of our net income adjusted for non-cash charges, offset by payments related to the restructuring charges.

In 2004, cash provided by operating activities was $25.7 million, primarily as a result of our net income adjusted for non-cash charges particularly related to the monetization of our shares of common stock of Google, offset by payments related to the restructuring charges.

Cash from investing activities.    Cash provided by investing activities was $40.2 million in 2007, primarily as a result of net proceeds from sales and purchases of short-term investments of $51.1 million offset by capital expenditures of $8.0 million, $1.3 million paid in connection with the acquisition of RentonJames and a $1.8 million increase in restricted cash.

Cash used in investing activities was $122.2 million in 2006, primarily as a result of net purchases and sales of short-term investments of $73.4 million, $36.0 million paid in connection with the acquisition of Highland Partners and a $7.9 million increase in restricted cash.

Cash provided by investing activities was $102.0 million in 2005 primarily as a result of the net proceeds from the salesales and purchases of short-term investments partially offset by payments to consultants related to sales of equity securities. During the second quarter of 2005, we paid $17.6 million of deferred compensation to Thomas J. Friel, representing his share of the net proceeds from the September 2004 monetization of our Google warrants. At the date of the payment, Mr. Friel was Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Friel’s share of the net proceeds is related to his work as an executive search consultant in 2001, prior to the time he was appointed our Chief Executive Officer.

Cash used in investing activities was $15.7 million in 2004 primarily as a result of the net proceeds of $128.8 million from the sale of our shares of common stock of Google offset by the portion of the consultants’ share of the gain which was paid in 2004 and the net purchases of short-term investments.

Capital expenditures were $8.0 million, $5.5 million, and $6.1 million in 2007, 2006 and $6.0 million in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Capital expenditures were primarily for computer equipment, software, and leasehold improvements. We anticipate that our capital expenditures for 20072008 will be approximately $7$22 million to $9 million.

Cash from financing activities.    Cash used in financing activities in 2007 was $42.8 million primarily as a result of the repurchase of $67.8 million of our common stock offset by $19.4 million of proceeds from stock options exercised during the year and $8.0 million of tax benefits associated with the exercise or vesting of equity awards.

In September 2007, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend payment in the amount of $0.13 per share. On an annual basis, the cash dividend is expected to be $0.52 per share. On November 16, 2007, $2.3 million was paid to share holders of record as of November 2, 2007. A cash dividend payable of $2.3 million has been reported as an other accrued liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007 related to the first quarter 2008 quarterly cash dividend payment.

Cash used in financing activities in 2006 was $37.4 million primarily as a result of the repurchase of $51.7 million of our common stock offset by proceeds from stock options exercised during the period.year. Cash flows for 2006 also includes $4.2 million of tax benefits associated with the exercise or vesting of equity awards.

Cash used in financing activities in 2005 was $27.6 million as a result of the repurchase of our common stock partially offset by proceeds from stock options exercised during the period.year. Cash from financing activities was $5.5 million in 2004, primarily the result of proceeds from the exercise of stock options offset by repurchases of our common stock.

On October 22, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate purchase price up to $30 million. We purchased 1,115,375 shares of our common stock for $30.0 million under the October 2004 authorization which was completed during the second quarter of 2005.

On September 16, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We purchased 1,476,809 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the September 2005 authorization, which was completed during the second quarter of 2006.

On May 24, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We purchased 1,132,073 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the May 2006 authorization, which was completed during the third quarter of 2007.

On May 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We intend from time to time and as marketbusiness conditions warrant, to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit has been set for completion of this program. ThroughA portion of the repurchased shares is intended to offset dilution associated with the Company’s employee equity programs. As of December 31, 2006,2007, we have purchased 326,368had repurchased 808,931 shares of our common stock for $11.4$30.7 million under the May 20062007 authorization and $19.3 million remained under this authorization.

Subsequent development.    On February 8, 2008, our Board of Directors, at its regularly scheduled meeting, authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We intend from time to time and as business conditions warrant to purchase share of our common stock on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit has been set for completion of the program.

Contractual obligations.    The following table presents our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 20062007 and the expected timing of cash payments related to these contractual obligations:obligations (in millions):

In addition to the contractual obligations included in the above table, we have liabilities related to certain employee benefit plans. These liabilities are recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006.2007. The obligations related to these employee benefit plans are described in Note 10,11,Employee Benefit Plans, and Note 11,12,Pension Plan and Life Insurance Contract.As the timing of cash disbursements related to these employee benefit plans is uncertain, we have not included these obligations in the above table. The table excludes our liability for uncertain tax positions including accrued interest and penalties, which totaled $6.9 million as of January 1, 2007 and $7.0 million as of December 31, 2007, since we cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

General.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2,

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. If actual amounts are ultimately different from previous estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements:

Revenue recognition.    Revenue before reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses (“net revenue”) is recognized when earned and realizable and therefore when the following criteria have been met: (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (b) services have been rendered; (c) the fee to our client is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectibility is reasonably assured. Net revenue consists of retainers and indirect expenses billed to clients. Typically, we are paid a retainer for our executive search services equal to approximately one-third of the estimated first year compensation of the position to be filled. If actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation, we are generally authorized to bill the client for one-third of the excess. Net revenue from executive search engagements is recognized over the expected average period of performance, in proportion to the estimated personnel time incurred to fulfill our obligations under the arrangements. Net revenue in excess of the retainer, resulting from actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeding estimated compensation, is recognized upon completion of the executive search when the amount of the additional fee is known. Our assumptions about the duration of the time and extent of efforts for search teams to complete our services in an executive search engagement require significant judgment as these variables have fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to do so. These assumptions are updated annually or whenever conditions exist to indicate that more frequent updates are necessary.

Accruals related to the consolidation and closing of offices recorded as part of our restructuring charges.    In 2001, we began the restructuring of our business to better align costs with expected net revenue levels. These initiatives included the consolidation and closing of offices where we had long-term leases. At the time of the office closings and consolidations, we accrued the estimated costs associated with these actions. For initiatives which were announced prior to January 1, 2003, the accruals were established in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” For cost reduction initiatives announced after December 31, 2002, the accruals were established in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.”

Inherent in these accruals are estimates concerning vacancy periods, expected sublease income, and costs to terminate the leases. These accruals are periodically updated to reflect information concerning the commercial real estate markets in which the offices are located. During 2004, we recorded $0.6 million of restructuring charges to reflect changes in lease estimates primarily due to a tenant default on a sublease and the final determination and payment of certain severance related restructuring accruals. During 2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $22.5 million, which include $14.1 million for severance and other employee-related costs related to reductions in workforce and $8.4 million related to the consolidation of office space. Included in the office related charge of $8.4 million is the reversal of $1.0 million of restructuring accruals, which originated in a prior year, related to a renegotiated lease for one of our search offices. During 2006, we revised estimates of previously announced restructuring initiatives and recorded restructuring charges of $0.4 million, primarily

related to the final determination of certain severance accruals and the refinement of cost estimates concerning certain sublet properties. During 2007, there were no restructuring charges taken. We believe that the accounting estimate related to accruals for the consolidation and closing of offices is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to changes in the commercial real estate markets and the local regional economic factors where this leased office space is located.

Income taxes.    Determining the consolidated provision for income tax expense, income tax liabilities and deferred tax assets and liabilities involves judgment. As a global company, we calculate and provide for income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This involves estimating current tax exposures in each jurisdiction as well as making judgments regarding the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Tax exposures can involve complex issues and may require an extended period to resolve. Changes in the geographic mix or estimated level of annual income before taxes can affect the overall effective tax rate.

We apply an estimated annual effective tax rate to our quarterly operating results to determine the provision for income tax expense. In the event there is a significant unusual or infrequent item recognized in our quarterly operating results, the tax attributable to that item is recorded in the interim period in which it occurs. Our effective tax rate for the financial year ended December 31, 20062007 was 38%35.2%.

No deferred tax liabilities have been recorded for U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes related to undistributed foreign earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested. If future events, including material changes in estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements, necessitate that these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for taxes may apply, which could materially affect our future effective tax rate.

As a matter of course, the Company iswe are regularly audited by various taxing authorities, and sometimes these audits result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in the Companyour owing additional taxes. We establish reserves when, despite our belief that ourin accordance with FIN 48 on uncertain tax return positions are appropriate and supportable under local tax law, we believe certain positions arethat do not meet the more likely to be challenged and we maythan not succeed in realizing the tax benefit.recognition criteria. We evaluate these reserves each quarter and adjust the reserves and the related accrued interest in light of changing facts and circumstances regarding the probabilityuncertainty of realizing tax benefits, such as the progressultimate settlement of a tax auditaudits or the expiration of a statute of limitations. We believe the estimates and assumptions used to support our evaluation of tax benefit realization are reasonable. However, final determinations of prior-year tax liabilities, either by settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitations, could be materially different than estimates reflected in assets and liabilities and historical income tax provisions. The outcome of these final determinations could have a material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period in which that determination is made. The Company believes itsWe believe our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and that it haswe have adequately provided for any known tax contingencies.reserves in accordance with FIN 48.

Goodwill and other intangible assets.    We review goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill of the reporting unit would be considered impaired. To measure the amount of the impairment loss, the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill shall be determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The fair value of each of the Company’sour reporting units was determined using a combination of valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow methodology and comparable public company methodology, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm.

The discounted cash flow approach is dependent on a number of factors including estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs, capital investments, appropriate discount rates, certain

assumptions to allocate shared assets and liabilities, and other variables to calculate the carrying values for each of our reporting units. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. These assumptions are updated annually, at a minimum, to reflect information concerning our reportable segments.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge, equal to the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, is recognized.

We believe that the accounting estimate related to goodwill and other intangible asset impairment is a critical accounting estimate because the assumptions used are highly susceptible to changes in the operating results and cash flows of our reportable segments.

Allowance for doubtful accounts.    Accounts receivable from our customers are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable balances. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts through an analysis of several factors, including the aging of our accounts receivable, historical write-off experience, and specific account analyses. We consider current and projected economic conditions and historical trends when determining the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual collections of accounts receivable could differ from our estimates due to changes in future economic or industry conditions or specific customers’ financial condition.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded as a reduction in revenue to the extent the provision relates to fee adjustments and other discretionary pricing adjustments. To the extent the provision relates to a customer’s inability to make required payments on accounts receivables, the provision is recorded within operating expenses.

Stock-based compensation.    We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), which requires us to measure the fair value of the share-based payment on the date of grant. We apply a forfeiture rate to our share-based awards that represents our best estimate of the amount of awards that will be forfeited. Our estimate is based on our historical experience and specific analysis. We review our forfeiture rate quarterly or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate our estimate may need to be revised. Actual forfeitures could differ from our estimates due to changes in retention rates of our employee population.

Recently IssuedAdopted Financial Accounting Standards

In JulyJune 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,”—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 is effective as of January 1, 2007.establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 requires thatclarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a position taken or expected to be taken inminimum recognition threshold a tax return beposition is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Upon adoption, the cumulative effect of applying the recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 48, if any, shall be reflected as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. We will adopt the provisions of this interpretation effective for the first quarter of 2007. We do not currently anticipate that the adjustment, if any, to the opening balance of retained earnings that will be recorded upon adoption of FIN 48 will materially impact our financial condition.

statements. FIN 48 also requires that subsequent to initial adoption a change in judgment that results in subsequent recognition,provides guidance on derecognition, or change in a measurement of a tax position taken in a prior annual period (including any relatedclassification, interest and penalties) be recognizedpenalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 resulting in an increase to our existing reserves for uncertain tax positions by $0.2 million, largely related to an increase in non-U.S. income tax matters. This increase was recorded as a discrete itemcumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. For additional information, see Note 17,Income Taxes.

In June 2006, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-3, “How Taxes Collected From Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should be Presented in the period in whichIncome Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” (“EITF 06-3”). The scope of EITF 06-3 includes any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer, and allows for the change occurs. Thus, our reported quarterly income tax rate may become more volatile upon adoption of FIN 48.an accounting policy of presenting taxes either on a gross basis within revenue or on a net basis. We collect various value added taxes on executive search and leadership consulting services, which have been and continue to be accounted for on a net basis. We adopted EITF 06-3 on January 1, 2007, the required effective date. The adoption of EITF 06-3 did not have an effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (“FSP 157-1”) and FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 isto remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. The measurement and disclosure requirements related to financial assets and financial liabilities are effective for us as of January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. However, the resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157 after adoption may be different from the fair values that would have been calculated under previous guidance. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial condition and results of operations when it is applied to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities beginning January 1, 2009.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of SFAS No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), to permit entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for us as of January 1, 2008. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

In September 2006,December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 123(R)”141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 158”141(R)”).

SFAS No. 158141(R) requires an employer to recognizethat all business combinations be accounted for by applying the funded status of each defined benefit post employment plan onacquisition method. Under the balance sheet. The funded status of all overfunded plans are aggregatedacquisition method, the acquirer recognizes and recognizedmeasures the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any contingent consideration and contractual contingencies, as a non-current asset on the balance sheet. The funded status of all underfunded plans are aggregated and recognized as a current liability, a non-current liability, or a combination of both on the balance sheet. A current liability is the amount by which the actuarial present value of benefits included in the benefit obligation payable in the next 12 months exceeds thewhole, at their fair value as of plan assets,the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and is determined on a plan-by-plan basis. SFAS No. 158 also requiresexpensed as incurred, restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement date of a plan’s assets and its obligations to be the employer’s fiscal year-end date, a requirement with which we already comply. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit post employment plan in the year in which the change occurs. SFAS No. 158 was effective for us as of December 31, 2006.period impact income tax expense. The effect of adopting SFAS No. 158 on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 was a decrease in retirement and pension plan liabilities of $3.3 million, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $2.2 million and a decrease in non-current deferred tax assets of $1.1 million. See Note 11Pension Plan and Life Insurance Contract to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the implementationadoption of SFAS No. 158.141(R) will change our accounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis beginning on January 1, 2009.

In September 2006,December 2007, the SECFASB issued Staff Accounting BulletinSFAS No. 108160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SAB 108”SFAS No. 160”), “Considering. SFAS No. 160 changes the Effectsaccounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 requires that public companies utilize a dual approach to assessing the quantitative effects of financial misstatements. This dual approach includes both an income statement focused assessment and a balance sheet focused assessment. Financial statements would require adjustment when a misstatement is material. Correcting prior year financial statements for immaterial errors would not require previously filed reports to be amended. SAB 108equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The adoptionus on a prospective basis for business combinations with an acquisition date beginning as of SAB 108 did notJanuary 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 160 will have an effect on our financial condition orand results of operations.

Quarterly Financial Information

The following table sets forth certain financial information for each quarter of 20062007 and 2005.2006. The information is derived from our quarterly consolidated financial statements which are unaudited but which, in the opinion of management, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual consolidated financial statements included in this document. The consolidated financial data shown below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

		Quarter Ended
		2007												2006
		March 31			June 30			Sept. 30			Dec. 31			March 31			June 30			Sept. 30				Dec. 31
Revenue before reimbursements (net revenue)		$	143,126		$	160,053		$	162,901		$	153,574		$	101,481		$	120,173		$	124,636			$	132,233
Operating income before restructuring charges			16,327			19,512			25,457			18,208			8,609			15,897			17,414				8,537
Restructuring charges			—			—			—			—			176			379			(149	)			2
Operating income			16,327			19,512			25,457			18,208			8,433			15,518			17,563				8,535
Income before income taxes			18,339			21,515			26,608			20,673			10,626			16,222			19,193				9,225
Provision for income taxes			8,263			496			10,476			11,437			4,700			5,832			8,042				2,449
Net income			10,076			21,019			16,132			9,236			5,926			10,390			11,151				6,776
Basic earnings per common share			0.56			1.17			0.90			0.53			0.32			0.58			0.64				0.38
Diluted earnings per common share			0.53			1.11			0.84			0.49			0.30			0.55			0.60				0.36

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Currency market risk.    With our operations primarily in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific we conduct business using various currencies. Revenue earned in each country is generally matched with the associated expenses incurred, thereby reducing currency risk to earnings. However, because certain assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, changes in currency rates may cause fluctuations in the valuation of such assets and liabilities. As the local currency of our subsidiaries has generally been designated as the functional currency, we are affected by the translation of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars. Outside of the Americas, Europe is our largest region in terms of net revenue. A 1% change in the average exchange rate of the British pound and the euro would have increased or decreased our 2007 net income approximately $0.3 million. For financial information by geographic segment, see Note 18,Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Derivative instruments.    We receive warrants for equity securities in our client companies, in addition to our cash fee, for services rendered on some searches. Some of the warrants meet the definition of a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and its subsequent amendments. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. These derivative instruments are initially recorded at their fair value using a Black-Scholes model, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with a corresponding amount recorded as net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Bonus expense related to this net revenue is also recorded. Subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as unrealized gains (losses), net of the consultants’ share of the gains (losses). Upon a value event such as an initial public offering or an acquisition, the warrants are monetized, resulting in a realized gain, net of the consultants’ share of the gain and other costs. In 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004,2005, we recorded realized gains, net of the consultants’ share of the gain and other costs, of $0.1 million, $0.6 million, $1.0 million, $57.0 million, respectively, related to the equity and warrant portfolio.

Currency market risk.    With our operations primarily in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific we conduct business using various currencies. Revenue earned in each country is generally matched with the associated expenses incurred, thereby reducing currency risk to earnings. However, because certain assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, changes in currency rates may cause fluctuations in the valuation of such assets and liabilities. As the local currency of our subsidiaries has been designated as the functional currency, we are affected by the translation of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars. Outside of the Americas, Europe is our largest region in terms of net revenue. A 1% change in the average exchange rate of the British pound and the euro would have increased or decreased our 2006 net income less than $0.3 million. For financial information by geographic segment, see Note 19,Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20062007 and 2005,2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we2007. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial statement schedule, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. Thesereporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and financial statement schedule are the responsibilityfor its assessment of the Company’s management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial statement schedulereporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well asand evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20062007 and 2005,2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,2007, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly,Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the information set forth therein.Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

As discussed in Note 1112 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for pension and postretirement benefits effective December 31, 2006.

As discussed in Note 1213 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based compensation effective January 1, 2006.

We also have audited,As discussed in accordance withNote 17 to the standardsconsolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 15, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and theaccounting for uncertain income tax positions effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.January 1, 2007.

/s/    KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 15, 2007February 28, 2008

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)