UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20062007

or

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number 0-23976

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (540) 465-9121

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $1.25 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filerfiler” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨     Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing sales price on June 30, 20062007 was $67,172,889.$61,394,951.

The number of outstanding shares of common stock as of March 23, 200724, 2008 was 2,922,860.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Proxy Statement for the 20072008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders – Part III

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The Company makes forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy and financial and other goals. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:

Because of these uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, past results of operations do not necessarily indicate future results.

General

First National Corporation (the Company) is a financial holding company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia on September 7, 1983. The Company owns all of the stock of its primary operating subsidiary, First Bank (the Bank), which is an independent commercial bank chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Company is also the parent company of First National (VA) Statutory Trust I (Trust I), First National (VA) Statutory Trust II (Trust II) and First National (VA) Statutory Trust III (Trust III). The Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities, commonly known as trust preferred securities.

The Bank first opened for business on July 1, 1907 under the name The Peoples National Bank of Strasburg. On January 10, 1928, the Bank changed its name to The First National Bank of Strasburg. On April 12, 1994, the Bank received approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the Federal Reserve) and the Virginia State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Financial Institutions to convert to a state chartered bank with membership in the Federal Reserve System. On June 1, 1994, the Bank consummated such conversion and changed its name to First Bank.

The Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, First Bank Financial Services, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which invests in partnerships that provide title insurance and investment services.

Access to Filings

The Company’s internet address iswww.firstbank-va.com. The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), are available free of charge atwww.firstbank-va.com. as soon as reasonably practicable after being filed with or furnished to the SEC. A copy of any of the Company’s filings will be sent, without charge, to any shareholder upon written request to: M. Shane Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, at 112 West King Street, Strasburg, Virginia 22657.

Products and Services

The Bank provides loan, deposit, investment, trust and asset management and other products and services in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia. Loan products and services include personal loans (including automobile and property improvement loans), residential mortgages, home equity loans credit cards and commercial loans. Deposit products and services include checking, savings, NOW accounts, money market accounts, IRA accounts, certificates of deposit and direct deposit services. The Bank offers other services, including safe deposit rentals, travelers checks,and gift cards, internet banking, wire transfer services and other traditional banking services.

The Bank’s Trust and Asset Management Department offers a variety of trust and asset management services including estate planning, investment management of assets, trustee under an agreement, trustee under a will, individual retirement accounts, estate settlement and benefit plans. The Bank offers financial planning and brokerage services for its customers through its investment division, First Financial Advisors.

The Bank’s primary market area is located within the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia, including Shenandoah County, Warren County, Frederick County and the City of Winchester. Within the market area there are various types of industry including medical and professional services, manufacturing, retail and higher education. Customers include individuals, small and medium-sized businesses, and local governmental entities.entities and non-profit organizations.

The Bank’s products and services are provided through 11 branch offices, 29 ATMs and its website,www.firstbank-va.com. The Bank operates six of its offices under the “Financial Center” concept. A Financial Center offers all of the Bank’s financial services at one location. This concept allows loan, retail deposit, trust and investment management personnel to be readily available to serve customers throughout the Bank’s market area. For the location of each of these Financial Centers, see Item 2 of this Form 10-K below.

Competition

The Company competes with large regional financial institutions, savings banks, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, credit unions, money market mutual funds and other community banks. Competition has been increasing from out-of-state banks through their acquisition of Virginia-based banks and branches.branches and expansion of credit unions into the market.

The financial service business in Virginia, and specifically in the Company’s market area, is highly competitive. Among the advantagesAdvantages the large regional financial institutions have over the Company are theirinclude the ability to support wide-ranging advertising campaigns, and, as a resultlarger amounts of their larger size, to havecapital and substantially higher lending limits. Credit unions have a competitive advantage because they have more favorable tax treatment than the Company and can pass those savings on to their customers through lower loan rates and higher deposit rates.

Factors affecting the competition for loans and deposits are interest rates offered, the number and location of branches and types of products offered, as well as the reputation of the institution. Advantages the Company has over the competition include long-term customer relationships, its commitment to excellent customer service, its dedicated and loyal employees, its local management and directors, and the support and involvement in the communities that the Company serves. The Company focuses on providing products and services to individuals, small to medium-sized businesses and local governmental entities within its communities. According to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) deposit data as of June 30, 2006,2007, the Bank was ranked first in Shenandoah County with $186.9$198.5 million in deposits, representing 26.6%27% of the total deposit market. The Bank was ranked third in Warren County with $72.1$77.3 million or 15.4%16% of the market, fourth in Frederick County with $41.8$54.4 million or 9.4%11% of the market, and sixth in the City of Winchester with $143.3$147.4 million or 8.1%8% of the market.

No material part of the business of the Company is dependent upon a single or a few customers, and the loss of any single customer would not have a materially adverse effect upon the business of the Company.

Employees

At December 31, 2006,2007, the Company and the Bank employed a total of 151172 full-time equivalent employees. The Company considers relations with its employees to be excellent.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

As a financial holding company, the Company is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. As a state-chartered commercial bank, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Virginia State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Financial Institutions. It is also subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board. Other federal and state laws, including various consumer and compliance laws, govern the activities of the Bank, the investments that it makes and the aggregate amount of loans that it may grant to one borrower. Laws and regulations administered by the regulatory agencies also affect corporate practices, including business practices related to payment and charging of interest, documentation and disclosures, and affect the ability to open and close offices or purchase other entities.

The following description summarizes the significant federal and state laws applicable to the Company’s industry. To the extent that statutory or regulatory provisions are described, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to that particular statutory or regulatory provision.

The Bank Holding Company Act

Under the Bank Holding Company Act, the Company is subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve and required to file periodic reports regarding its operations and any additional information that the Federal Reserve may require. Activities at the bank holding company are limited to:

Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely related to the business of a bank holding company include making or servicing loans and specific types of leases, performing specific data processing services and acting in some circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial adviser.

With some limited exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:

In addition, and subject to some exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with their regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring “control” of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities and either the company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging this rebuttable control presumption.

In November 1999, Congress enacted the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLBA), which made substantial revisions to the statutory restrictions separating banking activities from other financial activities. Under the GLBA, bank holding companies that are well-capitalized and well-managed and meet other conditions can elect to become “financial holding companies.” As financial holding companies, they and their subsidiaries are permitted to acquire or engage in previously impermissible activities such as insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and distribution, travel agency activities, insurance agency activities, merchant banking and other activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be financial in nature or complementary to these activities. Financial holding companies continue to be subject to the overall oversight and supervision of the Federal Reserve, but the GLBA applies the concept of functional regulation to the activities conducted by subsidiaries. For example, insurance activities would be subject to supervision and regulation by state insurance authorities.

Capital Requirements

The Federal Reserve Board has issued risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to banking organizations that it supervises. Under the risk-based capital requirements, the Company and the Bank are each generally required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total capital must be composed of “Tier 1 Capital,” which is defined as common equity, retained earnings and qualifying perpetual preferred stock, less certain intangibles. The remainder may consist of “Tier 2 Capital,” which is defined as specific subordinated debt, some hybrid capital instruments and other qualifying preferred stock and a limited amount of the loan loss allowance. Trust preferred securities may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy purposes as long as their amount does not exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital, including trust preferred securities. The portion of the trust preferred securities not considered as Tier 1 capital, if any, may be included in Tier 2 capital. In addition, each of the federal banking regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banking organizations. Under these requirements, banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets equal to 3% to 5%, subject to federal bank regulatory evaluation of an organization’s overall safety and soundness.

The risk-based capital standards of the Federal Reserve Board explicitly identify concentrations of credit risk and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage these risks, as important factors to be taken into account by the agency in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The capital guidelines also provide that an institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates be considered by the agency as a factor in evaluating a banking organization’s capital adequacy.

The FDIC may take various corrective actions against any undercapitalized bank and any bank that fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement a plan accepted by the FDIC. These powers include, but are not limited to, requiring the institution to be recapitalized, prohibiting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid, requiring prior approval of capital distributions by any bank holding company that controls the institution, requiring divestiture by the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of directors and officers. The Bank presently maintains sufficient capital to remain in compliance with these capital requirements.

Dividends

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries. The majority of the Company’s revenues are from dividends paid to the Company by the Bank. The Bank is subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends it can pay. In addition, both the Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory restrictions relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital at or above regulatory minimums. Banking regulators have indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only if the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Company does not expect that any of these laws, regulations or policies will materially affect the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. During the year ended December 31, 2006,2007, the Bank transferred $2.0$2.2 million in dividends to the Company. As of December 31, 2006,2007, the aggregate amount of unrestricted funds which could be transferred from the Bank to the Company, without prior regulatory approval, totaled $11.2$12.8 million.

The FDIC has the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice. The FDIC has indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice.

Insurance of Accounts

The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC up to the limits set forth under applicable law. The deposits of the Bank are subject to the deposit insurance assessments of the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of the FDIC. The FDIC has implemented a risk-based deposit insurance assessment system for well-capitalized and well-managed banks under which the assessment rate for an insured institution may vary according to regulatory capital levels of the institution and other factors, including supervisory evaluations. In addition, the FDIC has authority to impose special assessments from time to time.

On February 8, 2006, the President signed The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform Act) into law. The Reform Act merged the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund into the Deposit Insurance Fund, increased the coverage limit for retirement accounts to $250,000, indexed coverage limits for inflation and established a range for designated reserve ratios. The Reform Act also eliminated assessment restrictions on rates and granted the FDIC Board the discretion to price deposit insurance according to risk. The Bank was granted a one-time initial assessment credit to recognize past contributions to the fund.

The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any DIF-insured institution from engaging in any activity that the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the respective insurance fund. Also, the FDIC may initiate enforcement actions against banks, after first giving the institution’s primary regulatory authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any depository institution if it determines, after a hearing, that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed in writing by the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If deposit insurance is terminated, the deposits at the institution at the time of termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period from six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC. The Company is not aware of any existing circumstances that could result in termination of any of the Bank’s deposit insurance.

USA Patriot Act

The USA Patriot Act became effective on October 26, 2001 and provides for the facilitation of information sharing among governmental entities and financial institutions for the purpose of combating terrorism and money laundering. Among other provisions, the USA Patriot Act permits financial institutions, upon providing notice to the United States Treasury, to share information with one another in order to better identify and report to the federal government concerning activities that may involve money laundering or terrorism. The USA Patriot Act is considered a significant banking law in terms of information disclosure regarding certain customer transactions. Although it does create a reporting obligation, the Bank does not expect the USA Patriot Act tohas not materially affect itsaffected the Bank’s products, services or other business activities.

Community Reinvestment Act

Under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations, depository institutions have an affirmative obligation to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low and moderate-income areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practice. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the adoption by each institution of a Community Reinvestment Act statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institution’s efforts to assist in its community’s credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act and are periodically assigned ratings in this regard. Banking regulators consider a depository institution’s Community Reinvestment Act rating when reviewing applications to establish new branches, undertake new lines of business, and/or acquire part or all of another depository institution. An unsatisfactory rating can significantly delay or even prohibit regulatory approval of a proposed transaction by a bank holding company or its depository institution subsidiaries.

Privacy Legislation

Several regulations issued by federal banking agencies also provide protections against the transfer and use of customer information by financial institutions. A financial institution must provide to its customers information regarding its policies and procedures with respect to the handling of customers’ personal information. Each institution must conduct an internal risk assessment of its ability to protect customer information. These privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customer’s personal financial information to unaffiliated parties without prior notice and approval from the customer.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

An investment in the Company’s common stock involves significant risks. The following risks and uncertainties should be read carefully and considered before deciding to invest in the Company’s common stock. These risk factors may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and future earnings. In that event, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline and you could lose all or a part of your investment. This section should be read together with the other information, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company may be adversely affected by economic conditions in the market area.

The Company is headquartered in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia. Because lending is concentrated in this market, the Company will be affected by the general economic conditions in the region. Changes in the economy may influence the growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing. A significant decline in general economic conditions caused by inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors beyond the Company’s control would impact these local economic conditions and the demand for banking products and services generally, which could negatively affect the Company’s performance and financial condition.

The Bank’s concentration in loans secured by real estate may increase credit losses, which would negatively affect financial results.

The Bank offers a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. The majority of the loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) in the market area. At December 31, 2007, these loans totaled $374.3 million, or 84%, of loans, net of the allowance for loan losses. A major change in the real estate market, such as deterioration in the value of this collateral, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect customers’ ability to pay these loans, which in turn could impact the Bank. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are unavoidable in the banking industry, and the Bank tries to limit exposure to this risk by monitoring extensions of credit carefully. The Bank cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result credit losses may occur in the future.

If the Bank’s allowance for loan losses becomes inadequate, results of operations may be adversely affected.

The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses that it believes is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Through a periodic review and consideration of the loan portfolio, management determines the amount of the allowance for loan losses by considering economic conditions, credit quality of the loan portfolio, collateral supporting the loans, performance of customers relative to their financial obligations and the quality of the Bank’s loan administration. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond the Bank’s control, and these losses may exceed current estimates. Although the Company believes the allowance for loan losses is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio, such losses and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses cannot be fully predicted. Excessive loan losses could have a material impact on financial performance. Earnings may also be negatively impacted by loan growth, which requires additions to the allowance for loan losses.

Federal and state regulators periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require an increase to the provision for loan losses or recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. Any increase in the amount of provision or loans charged-off as required by these regulatory agencies could have a negative effect on operating results.

The Company’s business strategy calls for continued growth. The Company may not be able to successfully manage growth or implement growth strategies, which may adversely affect results of operations and financial condition.

During the last five years, the Company has experienced significant growth, and a key aspect of the business strategy is continued growth and expansion. The ability to continue to grow depends, in part, upon the ability to:

The Company may not be able to successfully implement the growth strategy if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future. The ability to manage growth successfully will also depend on whether the Company can maintain capital levels adequate to support the growth, maintain cost controls and asset quality, and successfully integrate any businesses that may be acquired into the organization.

As the Company continues to implement its growth strategies by opening new branch offices or acquiring branches or other banks, increased personnel, occupancy and other operating expenses are expected. In the case of new branch offices, the Company must absorb higher expenses while attempting to generate new deposits. Further, there is a time lag involved in redeploying new deposits into attractively priced loans and other earning assets. Thus, plans to branch could depress earnings in the short term, even if the branching strategy is executed efficiently.

Future success is dependent on the ability to compete effectively in the highly competitive banking industry.

The Company faces vigorous competition from other banks and other financial institutions, including savings and loan associations, savings banks, finance companies and credit unions for deposits, loans and other financial services in its market area. A number of these banks and other financial institutions are significantly larger than the Company and have substantially greater access to capital and other resources, as well as larger lending limits and branch systems, and offer a wider array of banking services. To a limited extent the Company also competes with other providers of financial services, such as money market mutual funds, brokerage firms, insurance companies and governmental organizations which may offer more favorable products and services than the Company. Many of the non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern the Company. As a result, the non-bank competitors have advantages over the Company in providing certain services. This competition may reduce or limit margins and market share and may adversely affect the results of operations and financial condition.

The Bank’s concentration in loans secured by real estate may increase credit losses, which would negatively affect financial results.

The Bank offers a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. The majority of the loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) in the market area. At December 31, 2006, these loans totaled $344.5 million, or 81.4%, of loans, net of the allowance for loan losses. A major change in the real estate market, such as deterioration in the value of this collateral, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect customers’ ability to pay these loans, which in turn could impact the Bank. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are unavoidable in the banking industry, and the Bank tries to limit exposure to this risk by monitoring extensions of credit carefully. The Bank cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result credit losses may occur in the future.

If the Bank’s allowance for loan losses becomes inadequate, results of operations may be adversely affected.

The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses that it believes is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Through a periodic review and consideration of the loan portfolio, management determines the amount of the allowance for loan losses by considering economic conditions, credit quality of the loan portfolio, collateral supporting the loans, performance of customers relative to their financial obligations and the quality of the Bank’s loan administration. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond the Bank’s

control, and these losses may exceed current estimates. Although the Company believes the allowance for loan losses is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio, such losses and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses cannot be fully predicted. Excessive loan losses could have a material impact on financial performance. Earnings may also be negatively impacted by loan growth, which requires additions to the allowance for loan losses.

Federal and state regulators periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require an increase to the provision for loan losses or recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. Any increase in the amount of provision or loans charged-off as required by these regulatory agencies could have a negative effect on operating results.

The Company may be adversely affected by economic conditions in the market area.

The Company is headquartered in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia. Because lending is concentrated in this market, the Company will be affected by the general economic conditions in the region. Changes in the economy may influence the growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing. A significant decline in general economic conditions caused by inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors beyond the Company’s control would impact these local economic conditions and the demand for banking products and services generally, which could negatively affect the Company’s performance and financial condition.

If the Company needs additional capital in the future to continue growth, it may not be able to obtain it on terms that are favorable. This could negatively affect the Company’s performance and the value of its common stock.

The Company anticipates that it will be able to support continued growth through the generation of additional deposits at new branch locations as well as investment opportunities. However, additional capital may be needed in the future to support continued growth and to maintain capital levels. The ability to raise capital through the sale of additional securities will depend primarily upon the Company’s financial condition and the condition of financial markets at that time. The Company may not be able to obtain additional capital in the amounts or on terms that are satisfactory. The Company’s growth may be constrained if it is unable to raise additional capital as needed.

The Company may incur losses if unable to successfully manage interest rate risk.

The Company’s profitability will depend substantially upon the spread between the interest rates earned on investments and loans and interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. The Bank may pay above-market rates to attract deposits and charge below-market rates to attract loans. Changes in interest rates, including the shape of the treasury yield curve, will affect the Company’s financial performance and condition through the pricing of securities, loans, deposits and borrowings. The Company attempts to minimize exposure to interest rate risk, but will be unable to eliminate it. Our net interest spread will depend on many factors that are partly or entirely outside of the Company’s control, including competition, federal economic, monetary and fiscal policies and general economic conditions.

The Company relies heavily on its management team and the unexpected loss of any of those personnel could adversely affect operations; the Company depends on the ability to attract and retain key personnel.

The Company is a customer-focused and relationship-driven organization. We expect future growth to be driven in a large part by the relationships maintained with our customers by our senior officers. We have entered into employment agreements with Harry S. Smith, Dennis A Dysart, J. Andrew Hershey, M. Shane Bell, Marshall J. Beverley, Jr. and W. Blakeley Curtis. These employees are key officers who oversee major functional areas of the Company. The existence of such agreements, however, does not necessarily assure that we will be able to continue to retain their services. The unexpected loss of key officers could have a material adverse affect on our business and possibly result in reduced revenues and earnings.

The implementation of the Company’s business strategy will also require the Company to continue to attract, hire, motivatecontinued attraction, hiring, motivation and retainretention of skilled personnel to develop new customer relationships as well as new financial products and services. Many experienced banking professionals employed by the Company’s competitors are covered by agreements not to compete or solicit existing customers if they were to leave their current employment. These agreements make the recruitment of these professionals difficult. The market for these people is competitive, and the Company cannot guarantee that it will be successful in attracting, hiring, motivating or retaining them.

The Company’s profitability and the value of an investment in the Company may suffer because of rapid and unpredictable changes in the highly regulated environment.

The Company is subject to extensive supervision by several governmental regulatory agencies at the federal and state levels. Recently enacted, proposed and future banking legislation and regulations have had, and will continue to have, or may havehas a significant impact on the financial services industry. These regulations, which are intended to protect depositors and not the shareholders, and the

interpretation and application of them by federal and state regulators, are beyond the Company’s control, may change rapidly and unpredictably and can be expected to influence earnings and growth. The Company’s success depends on the continued ability to maintain compliance with these regulations. Some of these regulations may increase costs and thus place other financial institutionsmanagement succession plan that has identified employees that are not subject to similar regulationscapable of succeeding key officers in stronger, more favorable competitive positions.certain roles.

There is a limited trading market for the Company’s common stock; it may be difficult to sell shares after they have been purchased.

Shares of the Company’s common stock are traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market and quoted in the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “FXNC.” The volume of trading activity in the stock is relatively limited. Even if a more active market develops, there can be no assurance that such market will continue, or that shares will be able to be sold at or above the investment price. The lack of liquidity of the investment in the common shares should be carefully considered when making an investment decision.

Not applicable.

The following describes the location and general character of the principal offices of the Company.

The Company owns the headquarters building located at 112 West King Street, in Strasburg, Virginia. This location also serves as the Bank’s Strasburg Financial Center, which primarily serves the banking needs of northern Shenandoah County customers. This three story building also houses the administrative personnelmajority of the Company,administrative employees, including human resources, marketing, financial accounting and loan operations. Deposit operations is housed in the Winchester Financial Center. Financial centers provide full service banking, including loan, deposit, investment, trust and asset management services, while the bank branches primarily focus on depository and consumer lending functions. The following table provides the name, location, year opened and type of the Company’s locations:

Rental expense for the leased locations totaled $34$37 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006.2007. The lease for the Front Royal Express property expires on April 30, 2007, with a six-month renewal option.2008. The lease for the North Woodstock property expires on May 31, 2016, without a renewal option.

All of the Company’s properties are in good operating condition and are adequate for the Company’s present and future needs.

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which the property of the Company is subject.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report through a solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

Part II

Market Prices and Dividends

Shares of the common stock of the Company are traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market and quoted in the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “FXNC.” As of March 19, 2007,21, 2008, the Company had approximately 689675 shareholders of record and at least 478 additional beneficial owners of shares of common stock.

Following are the high and low prices of sales of common stock known to the Company, along with the dividends that were paid quarterly in 20062007 and 2005.2006.

Dividend Policy

The Company’s future dividend policy is subject to the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, liquidity and capital requirements of both the Company and the Bank, applicable governmental regulations and policies and other factors deemed relevant by its Board of Directors.

The Company is organized under the Virginia Stock Corporation Act, which prohibits the payment of a dividend if, after giving it effect, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or if the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the corporation were to be dissolved, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of any preferred shareholders.

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. Its ability to distribute cash dividends will depend primarily on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to it, and the Bank is subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends that it can pay. As a state member bank, the Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by the reserve and capital requirements of federal and Virginia banking statutes and regulations. Under Virginia law, a bank may not declare a dividend in excess of its undivided profits. Additionally, the Bank may not declare a dividend if the total amount of all dividends, including the proposed dividend, declared by it in any calendar year exceeds the total of its retained net income of that year to date, combined with its retained net income of the two preceding years, unless the dividend is approved by the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve and the stateCommonwealth of Virginia have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice. Both the stateCommonwealth of Virginia and the Federal Reserve have indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice. Under the Federal Reserve’s regulations, the Bank may not declare or pay any dividend in excess of its net income for the current year plus any retained net income from the prior two calendar years. The Bank may also not declare or pay a dividend without the approval of its board and two-thirds of its shareholders if the dividend would exceed its undivided profits, as reported to the Federal Reserve.

In addition, the Company is subject to certain regulatory requirements to maintain capital at or above regulatory minimums. These regulatory requirements regarding capital affect its dividend policies. The Federal Reserve has indicated that a bank holding company should generally pay dividends only if its net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition.

Stock Repurchases

The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the fourth quarter of 2006.2007.

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total return to the shareholders of the Company for the last five fiscal years with the total return on the S&P 500, NASDAQ-Total U.S. and the SNL Bank Index <> $500M, assuming an investment of $100 in shares of Common Stock on December 31, 2001,2002, and the reinvestment of dividends.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The following is selected financial data for the Company for the last five years. This information has been derived from audited financial information included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 2005 and 20042005 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Executive Overview

The Company

First National Corporation (the Company) is the financial holding company of First Bank (the Bank), First National (VA) Statutory Trust I (Trust I), First National (VA) Statutory Trust II (Trust II) and First National (VA) Statutory Trust III (Trust III). The Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities, commonly known as trust preferred securities. The Bank owns First Bank Financial Services, Inc., which invests in partnerships that provide title insurance and investment services.

Products, Services, Customers and Locations

The Bank offers loan, deposit, trust and investment products and services through 11 offices, 29 ATMs and its website,www.firstbank-va.com, for both individuals and businesses. Customers include individuals, small and medium-sized businesses and governmental entities in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia.

Revenue Sources and Expense Factors

The Company’s primary source of revenue is from net interest income earned by the Bank. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense.expense and represents approximately 75% of the Company’s total revenue. Interest income is determined by the amount of interest-earning assets, principally loans and securities, outstanding during the period and the interest rates earned on those assets. The Bank’s interest expense is a function of the amount of interest-bearing liabilities outstanding, principally deposits, during the period and the interest rates paid. In addition to net interest income, noninterest income is another important source of revenue for the Company. Noninterest income is derived primarily from service charges on deposit accountsloans and deposits and fees earned from bankother services. The Bank generates fee income from other services that include trust services and investment and trustadvisory services and through the origination and sale of residential mortgages. Other factors that impact net income are the

The provision for loan losses and noninterest expense are the two expense categories. The factors management considers when determining the provision for loan losses are loan growth, net charge-offs and other factors. Other factors include, but are not limited to, loss experience over a three-year period, general economic conditions, asset quality and collateral value. Changes in inflation, economic growth, unemployment and other general economic factors beyond the Company’s control have a direct correlation with asset quality, net charge-offs and ultimately the required provision for loan losses. The material components of noninterest expense are salaries and employee benefits, which comprise 55% of noninterest expense, and occupancy and equipment expense, comprising 15% of noninterest expense.

Financial Performance

For the year ended December 31, 2006,2007, net income was $5.7 million, a decrease of $51 thousand or 1% compared to $5.8 million an increase of $409 thousand or 7.6% compared to $5.4 million in 2005.2006. The increasedecrease in earnings resulted from an 8.2% increase in net interest income,was a 54.9% decrease in the provision for loan losses and an 18.3% increase inresult of noninterest income, offset by a 16.5% increaseexpense growth of 11% that outpaced revenue growth of 6%. The growth in noninterest expense when comparingduring 2007 was primarily attributable to two new branch offices that opened during the second and third quarters of 2006. Noninterest income increased 17% for 2007 compared to 2006 due to 2005. increases in fee income from trust and investment advisory services, ATM and check card fees and service charges on deposit accounts. Net gains on sale of premises and equipment totaled $363 thousand for 2007 compared to no gains or losses in 2006. This resulted from selling a potential branch site during the fourth quarter of 2007. Net interest income increased 3% as a result of 4% growth in average interest-earning assets during the year.

Net income per share, basic and diluted, increased $0.15decreased $0.01 to $1.99$1.98 for the year ended December 31, 20062007 from $1.84$1.99 for 2005.2006. The return on average assets was 1.09% for 2007, compared to 1.15% for 2006, compared to 1.22% for 2005, and the return on average equity was 16.52% for 2007 compared to 18.49% for 2006 compared to 19.48% for 2005.

Net interest income increased in 2006, compared to 2005, as a result of growth in average interest-earning assets. The increase in noninterest income was primarily a result of increased fee income generated from other customer services, including trust and asset management services, check card fees and brokerage services. Noninterest expenses increased in 2006 compared to 2005 due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits and increases in other operating expenses as a result of expansion of the retail branch network.2006.

During 2006,2007, total assets increased 11.1%3%, or $53.0$13.6 million, to $541.6 million at December 31, 2007 from $527.9 million at December 31, 2006 from $475.0 million at December 31, 2005.2006. Asset growth occurred primarily in the loan portfolio where loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased 13.2%5%, or $49.4$22.2 million, to $445.4 million at December 31, 2007 from $423.2 million at December 31, 2006 from $374.32006. Asset growth was funded primarily by deposits that increased $10.1 million or 2% to $445.1 million at December 31, 2005. Asset growth was funded by deposits that increased $57.3 million or 15.2% to2007 from $435.0 million at December 31, 2006 from $377.72006.

Asset quality weakened during 2007 when compared to 2006. Nonperforming assets were $2.3 million and $721 thousand at December 31, 2005.2007 and 2006, representing 0.50% and 0.17% of loans, respectively. Net charge-offs were $169 thousand for 2007, compared to net recoveries of $72 thousand in 2006. The provision for loan losses was $398 thousand and $378 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The allowance for loan losses increased to 0.94% of total loans at December 31, 2007, up from 0.93% of total loans at December 31, 2006.

Management Outlook

In 2008, the Company is planning for similar earning asset growth that was experienced during 2007. Deposit growth opportunities and loan demand began slowing in the second half of 2006 and continued to slow during 2007. The Company experienced net interest margin compressiondoes not expect this to change during 2006 as a result of increased competition for deposits, price sensitive deposit customers and the inverted treasury yield curve that created higher short-term rates. The combination of these factors created an unfavorable shift2008, anticipating no improvement in the funding mix and an increased cost of funds.economic conditions. The net interest margin decreased 22 basis pointsis expected to 3.74% for 2006, comparedremain stable as the spread between the yield on earning assets and funding costs is not anticipated to 3.96% for 2005. For the fourth quarter of 2006, thesignificantly change. Increases in net interest margin was 3.55%. The Company expects the net interest margin to stabilize during 2007 as a result of the anticipated re-pricing of higher rate interest-bearing liabilities, which include certain time deposits thatincome will mature during the first quarter of 2007 and lower rate loans that mature throughout the year. However,primarily be determined by the ability to attract lower cost funds, including noninterest-bearing deposits, and the shapegrow earning assets at acceptable margins.

The rate of the treasury yield curve will have a significant impact on future increases or decreasesgrowth in net interest income.

Another factor that impacts netnoninterest income is expected to decrease in future periods as the provision for loan losses.trust department is no longer experiencing rapid growth. The provisiondepartment began operations in 2005 and experienced higher growth during 2005 and 2006 from initial market demand. Noninterest expense growth is determined by asset quality, net charge-offs, loan growth and economic conditions. Economic conditions, which mayalso expected to slow. Although the Company does not be as favorableplan to expand the branch network in the near future, have a direct correlation with asset quality, net charge-offsterm, an operations center is under construction and ultimatelyis scheduled to be placed in service during the required provision forsecond quarter of 2008. The new operations center is expected to support loan losses. Noninterest income and noninterest expense are the other factors that impact net income.deposit growth as economic conditions become more favorable. The Company does not anticipate noninterest incomecenter is also expected to continue increasing in future periods at recent growth rates, primarily due to the rapid growth of trustfacilitate long-term operational efficiencies and asset management fee income since the department’s initial year of operation in 2005. Noninterest expense is not expectedanticipated to increase expenses at recent growth ratesthe same level as theadding a new branch office. The Company plans to slow the expansion of the retail banking network as part of efforts to maintain earnings per share growth during periods of lower net interest margins.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The Company makes forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy and financial and other goals. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:

Because of these uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, past results of operations do not necessarily indicate future results.employees.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This report refers to the efficiency ratio, which is computed by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains and losses. This is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company believes provides investors with important information regarding operational efficiency. Such information is not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be construed as such. Management believes, however, such financial information is meaningful to the reader in understanding operating performance, but cautions that such information not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP. The Company, in referring to its net income, is referring to income under GAAP. The components of the efficiency ratio calculation are summarized in the table below.

TheThis report also refers to net interest margin, which is calculated by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by total average earning assets. Because a portion of interest income earned by the Company is nontaxable, the tax equivalent net interest income is considered in the calculation of this ratio. Tax equivalent net interest income is calculated by adding the tax benefit realized from interest income that is nontaxable to total interest income then subtracting total interest expense. The tax rate utilized in calculating the tax benefit for each of 20062007 and 20052006 is 34%. The reconciliation of tax equivalent net interest income, which is not a measurement under GAAP, to net interest income, is reflected in the table below.

Critical Accounting Policies

General

The Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The financial information contained within the statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Bank uses historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in the loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors used. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another. Although the economics of transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact transactions could change. For further information about the Bank’s loans and the allowance for loan losses, see Notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Presented below is a discussion of those accounting policies that management believes are the most important (“Critical Accounting Policies”) to the portrayal and understanding of the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. The Critical Accounting Policies require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood.

Allowance for loan lossesLoan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on three basic principles of accounting: (i)(1) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable, (ii)(2) SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance and (iii)(3) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 102, “Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues,” which requires adequate documentation to support the allowance for loan losses estimate.

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The Bank’s allowance for loan losses has two basic components: the specific allowance and the general allowance. Both of these components are determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the actual events occur. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of the sum of the specific allowance and the general allowance.

The specific allowance is typically used to individually allocate an allowance for larger balance, commercial, non-homogeneous loans. The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss. First, analysis of the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record; the prospects for support from financial guarantors; and the fair market value of collateral, net of selling costs, are used to estimate the probability and severity of inherent losses. Second, historical default rates and loss severities, internal risk ratings, industry and market conditions and trends, and other environmental factors are considered. The use of these values is inherently subjective and actual losses could differ from the estimates.

The general allowance is used for estimating the loss on pools of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans; including residential mortgage loans, installment loans, other consumer loans, and outstanding loan commitments. This formula is also used for the remaining pool of larger balance, non-homogeneous loans, which were not allocated a specific allowance upon impairment review. The general allowance begins with estimates of probable losses inherent in the homogeneous portfolio. This includes, but is not limited to, analysis of loss experience over a three-year period, economic conditions, asset quality and collateral value. The general allowance uses a historical loss view as an indicator of future losses. As a result, even though this history is regularly updated with the most recent loss information, it could differ from the loss incurred in the future.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the BankCompany will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value (net of selling costs), and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, net of selling costs, if the loan repayment is collateral dependent. The BankCompany does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

The general allowance is used for estimating the loss on pools of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans; including residential mortgage loans, installment loans, other consumer loans, and outstanding loan commitments. This formula is also used for the remaining pool of larger balance, non-homogeneous loans, which were not allocated a specific allowance upon impairment review. The general allowance begins with estimates of probable losses inherent in the homogeneous portfolio based upon various statistical analyses. These include analysis of historical delinquency and loss experience over a five-year period, together with analyses that reflect current economic trends and conditions. The general allowance uses a historical loss view as an indicator of future losses. As a result, even though this history is regularly updated with the most recent loss information, it could differ from the loss incurred in the future.

Lending Policies

General

The principal risk associated with each of the categories of loans in the Bank’s portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers. Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased, depending on prevailing economic conditions. The risk associated with real estate mortgage loans, commercial and consumer loans varies, based on economic conditions, fluctuations in the value of real estate and other conditions that affect the ability of borrowers to repay indebtedness. The risk associated with real estate construction loans varies, based on the supply and demand for the type of real estate under construction.

In an effort to manage the risk, the Bank’s loan policy gives loan amount approval limits to individual loan officers based on their position within the Bank and level of experience. The Bank’s Board of Directors and its Loan Committee approves all loan relationships greater than $1.5 million. The President &and CEO and the Executive Vice President—Loan Administration can combine their lending limits to approve loan relationships up to $1.5 million. All loan relationships greater than $750 thousand are reported to the Board or its Loan Committee. The Loan Committee consists of five non-management directors and the President &and CEO. The Committee approves the Bank’s Loan Policy and reviews loans that have been charged-off. It also reviews the allowance for loan loss adequacy calculation as well as the loan watch list and other management reports. The Committee meets on a monthly basis and the Chairman of the Committee then reports to the Board of Directors.

Residential loan originations are primarily generated by the Bank’sBank loan officer solicitations, referrals by real estate professionals and customers. Commercial real estate loan originations are obtained through broker referrals, direct solicitation of developers and continued business from customers. All completed loan applications are reviewed by the Bank’s loan officers. As part of the application process, information is obtained concerning the income, financial condition, employment and credit history of the applicant. If commercial real estate is involved, information is also obtained concerning cash flow available for debt service. Loan quality is analyzed based on the Bank’s experience and credit underwriting guidelines as well as the guidelines issued by the purchasers of loans, depending on the type of loan involved. Real estate collateral is appraised by independent fee appraisers who have been pre-approved by the Executive Vice President - President—Loan Administration.

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities which are disclosed but not reflected in its financial statements, including commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2006,2007, commitments to extend credit, stand-by letters of credit and rate lock commitments totaled $77.9$78.1 million.

Commercial Business Lending

Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk than loans secured by real estate, but typically have higher yields. Commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, the collateral for commercial business loans may depreciate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate. To manage these risks, the Bank generally obtains appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners and monitors the financial condition of its business borrowers. At December 31, 2006,2007, commercial loans not secured by real estate totaled $50.9$53.0 million, or 11.9%12% of the total loan portfolio, as compared to $41.1$50.9 million, or 10.9%12% at December 31, 2005.2006.

Commercial Real Estate Lending

Commercial real estate loans are secured by various types of commercial real estate typically in the Bank’s market area, including multi-family residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, hotels, small shopping centers, farms and churches. At December 31, 2006,2007, commercial real estate loans aggregated $171.3$194.4 million, or 40.1%43% of the Bank’s gross loans, as compared to $151.0$171.3 million, or 40.0%40% at December 31, 2005.2006. In its underwriting of commercial real estate, the Bank may lend, under federal regulation, up to 85% of the secured property’s appraised value, although the Bank’s loan to original appraised value ratio on such properties is typically 80% or less. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk, compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the payment experience on loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or in the economy, in general. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrower’s creditworthiness, prior credit history and reputation. The Bank typically requires personal guarantees of the borrowers’ principal owners and carefully evaluates the location and environmental condition of the real estate collateral.

Construction Lending

The Bank makes local construction loans, including residential and land acquisition and development loans. These loans are secured by the property under construction and the underlying land for which the loan was obtained. Construction and land development loans outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 were $60.9$73.5 million, or 14.3%16% of gross loans, and $49.7$60.9 million, or 13.2%14% of gross loans, respectively. The majority of these loans have an average life of approximately one year and reprice monthly as key rates change. Construction lending entails significant additional risks, compared with residential mortgage lending. Construction loans often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Another risk involved in construction lending is attributable to the fact that loan funds are advanced upon the security of the land or property under construction, which value is estimated prior to the completion of construction. Thus, it is more difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project and related loan-to-value ratios. To mitigate the risks associated with construction lending, the Bank generally limits loan amounts to 80% of appraised value, in addition to analyzing the creditworthiness of its borrowers. The Bank typically obtains a first lien on the property as security for its construction loans, typically requires personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners, and monitors the progress of the construction project during the draw period.

Residential Real Estate Lending

Residential lending activity may be generated by the Bank’sBank loan officer solicitations, referrals by real estate professionals and existing or new bank customers. Loan applications are taken by a Bank loan officer. As part of the application process, information is gathered concerning income, employment and credit history of the applicant. Residential mortgage loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from employment and other income and are secured by real estate whose value tends to be readily ascertainable. In addition to the Bank’s underwriting standards, loan quality may be analyzed based on guidelines issued by a secondary market investor. The valuation of residential collateral is provided by independent fee appraisers who have been approved by the Bank’s Executive Vice President -LoanPresident-Loan Administration.

Typically, the Bank originates fixed rate mortgage loans with the intent to sell to correspondent lenders. Depending on the financial goals of the Company, the Bank occasionally originates and retains these loans. At December 31, 2006, $112.32007, $106.4 million, or 26.3%,24% of the Bank’s loan portfolio consisted of one-to-four family loans secured by residential real estate, as compared to $99.4$112.3 million, or 26.3%26%, at December 31, 2005.2006.

In connection with residential real estate loans, the Bank requires title insurance, hazard insurance and, if required, flood insurance. Flood determination letters with life of loan tracking are obtained on all federally related transactions with improvements serving as security for the transaction. The Bank does require escrows for real estate taxes and insurance for secondary market loans.

The Company does not participate in sub-prime lending practices so issues recently arising in the residential mortgage market from sub-prime lending are not expected to have a direct impact on earnings. Nevertheless, the Company is subject to risks associated with general economic and business conditions in its market area, as well as the condition of the regional residential mortgage market, each of which may be impacted by sub-prime lending and related issues.

Consumer Lending

The Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, automobile loans, deposit account loans and installment and demand loans, and credit card loans. At December 31, 2006,2007, consumer loans, including deposit overdraft balances, totaled $24.7were $18.8 million, or 5.8%4% of gross loans, as compared to $29.6$24.7 million, or 7.8%6%, at December 31, 2005.2006.

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured, such as lines of credit, or secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

The underwriting standards employed by the Bank for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on a proposed loan. The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes an analysis of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Results of Operations

General

Net interest income represents the primary source of earnings for the Company. Net interest income equals the amount by which interest income on earninginterest-earning assets, predominately loans and securities, exceeds interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits, other borrowings and trust preferred securities. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates, are the components that impact the level of net interest income. The net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income by average earning assets. The provision for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense are the other components that determine net income. Noninterest income and expense primarily consists of income from service charges on deposit accounts; fees charged for other customer services;services, including trust, asset management and brokerage fee income; gains and losses from the sale of assets, including loans held for sale, securities and premises and equipment; general and administrative expenses; and income tax expense.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, net income was $5.7 million or $1.98 per basic and diluted share. This is a 1% decrease compared to net income of $5.8 million or $1.99 per basic and diluted shares for 2006. This decrease in earnings was a result of expense growth of 11% that outpaced revenue growth of 6%. The increase in noninterest expense was almost entirely offset by a 17% increase in noninterest income and a 3% increase in net interest income. For the year ended December 31, 2006, net income increased 7.6% to $5.8 million8% from $5.4 million forin 2005. ThisThe increase in earnings was attributable to an 8.2%8% increase in net interest income, a 54.9%55% decrease in the provision for loan losses and an 18.3%18% increase in noninterest income, offset by a 16.5%17% increase in noninterest expense when comparing the periods. For the year ended December 31, 2005, net income increased 28.1% from $4.2 million in 2004. The increase in earnings was primarily the result of a 22.0% increase in net interest income, offset by a 1.4% decrease in noninterest income and a 9.7% increase in noninterest expense when comparing 2005 to 2004.

The Company anticipates that moderate balance sheet growth and re-pricing of loans and deposits will provide opportunities for earnings growth in 2007. Net interest income is expected to increase in future periods from balance sheet growth and a stable net interest margin. The Company has expanded the retail banking network by opening two branch offices in 2006. This expansion has increased noninterest expense during the year, but the Company does not expect noninterest expense to continue increasing at the same pace as recent periods as the Company plans to slow the expansion of the retail banking network as part of efforts to maintain earnings per share growth during periods of lower net interest margins.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $17.6$18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,2007, which is an increase of $1.4 million$545 thousand or 8.2%3% over $16.2$17.6 million reported for the same period in 2005.2006. Growth in average earninginterest-earning assets, predominantly in the loan portfolio, was partially offset by a slight decline in the net interest margin. Average earninginterest-earning assets increased 14.4%4%, or $60.0$19.1 million, when comparing the periods. The net interest margin for 20062007 was 3.74%, a 22 basis point decrease when3.71% compared to 3.96%3.74% for 2005.2006. The slight decline in the net interest margin was attributable to increased competition for deposits, price sensitive deposit customers and the inverted treasury yield curve that created high short-term market rates. The combination of these factors created an unfavorable shift in the Company’s funding mix and an increased cost of funds.costs from interest-bearing deposits. In 2005,2006, net interest income increased $2.9$1.4 million, or 22.0%8%, from $13.3$16.2 million in 2004.2005.

The net interest margin was 3.71% in 2007, 3.74% in 2006, and 3.96% in 2005, and 3.84% in 2004.2005. Interest income as a percent of average earning assets was 7.21% in 2007, 6.96% in 2006 and 6.31% in 2005 and 5.88% in 2004.2005. Interest expense as a percent of average interest-bearing liabilities was 4.25% in 2007, 3.94% in 2006 and 2.94% in 2005 and 2.55% in 2004.2005. The interest rate spread was 2.96% in 2007, 3.02% in 2006 and 3.37% in 2005 and 3.33% in 2004. The Company does not anticipate significant changes in net interest income resulting from key interest rate changes during the next 12 months based2005. Based on the interest rate sensitivity analysis included in Item 7A (Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk) below. Thebelow, the Company does not anticipate market rate changes to have a significant impact on net interest margin inincome during the fourth quarter of 2006 was 3.55%.next 12 months. The Company does not expect the negative trendsignificant changes in the net interest margin to continue based on the anticipated re-pricing of higher cost deposits and lower earning assets. However, futureduring 2008. Therefore, increases or decreases in net interest income will be primarily determined by the Company’s ability to maintain or improve the net interest margin and the growth of earning assets.grow interest-earning assets at acceptable margins.

The following table provides information on average earninginterest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004,2005, as well as amounts and rates of tax equivalent interest earned and interest paid. The volume and rate analysis table analyzes the changes in net interest income for the periods broken down by their rate and volume components.

		Average Balances, Income and Expense, Yields and Rates
		(dollars in thousands)
		Years Ending December 31,
		2007										2006										2005
		Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate			Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate			Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate
Assets
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		$	2,204			$	103		4.67	%		$	2,046			$	111		5.45	%		$	759			$	78		10.32	%
Securities:
Taxable			48,248				2,359		4.89	%			57,984				2,687		4.63	%			53,667				2,221		4.14	%
Tax-exempt (1)			11,349				715		6.30	%			8,862				641		7.23	%			9,699				620		6.39	%
Total securities			59,597				3,074		5.16	%			66,846				3,328		4.98	%			63,366				2,841		4.48	%
Loans: (2)
Taxable			431,613				32,444		7.52	%			404,777				29,574		7.31	%			349,140				23,156		6.63	%
Tax-exempt (1)			2,282				142		6.20	%			2,493				158		6.32	%			3,299				221		6.70	%
Total loans			433,895				32,586		7.51	%			407,270				29,732		7.30	%			352,439				23,377		6.63	%
Federal funds sold			502				29		5.75	%			898				45		4.99	%			540				19		3.58	%
Total earning assets			496,198				35,792		7.21	%			477,060				33,216		6.96	%			417,104				26,315		6.31	%
Less: allowance for loan losses			(3,985	)									(3,770	)									(3,218	)
Total nonearning assets			34,012										30,838										26,901
Total assets		$	526,225									$	504,128									$	440,787
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking		$	56,823			$	1,613		2.84	%		$	53,806			$	1,362		2.53	%		$	63,108			$	1,185		1.88	%
Money market accounts			6,674				87		1.30	%			11,144				197		1.77	%			13,688				179		1.31	%
Savings accounts			112,702				4,188		3.72	%			79,613				2,649		3.33	%			66,138				1,385		2.09	%
Certificates of deposit:
Less than $100,000			96,361				4,335		4.50	%			90,618				3,623		4.00	%			75,912				2,432		3.21	%
Greater than $100,000			78,666				3,826		4.86	%			83,334				3,807		4.57	%			53,986				1,910		3.54	%
Total interest-bearing deposits			351,226				14,049		4.00	%			318,515				11,638		3.65	%			272,832				7,091		2.60	%
Federal funds purchased			3,044				170		5.57	%			4,493				246		5.47	%			3,872				152		3.94	%
Company obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities			12,372				956		7.73	%			9,988				764		7.65	%			8,248				495		6.00	%
Other borrowings			42,784				2,226		5.20	%			56,979				2,744		4.82	%			48,418				2,048		4.23	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities			409,426				17,401		4.25	%			389,975				15,392		3.94	%			333,370				9,786		2.94	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits			78,947										81,160										77,819
Other liabilities			3,064										1,634										1,932
Total liabilities			491,437										472,769										413,121
Shareholders’ equity			34,788										31,359										27,666
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	526,225									$	504,128									$	440,787
Net interest income						$	18,391									$	17,824									$	16,529
Interest rate spread									2.96	%									3.02	%									3.37	%
Interest expense as a percent of average earning assets									3.51	%									3.23	%									2.35	%
Net interest margin									3.71	%									3.74	%									3.96	%