UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 


FORM 10-K10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 20072009

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 000-22754

 


URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


 

Pennsylvania 23-2003332

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

5000 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1495
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 454-5500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Shares, $.0001 par value The NASDAQ StockGlobal Select Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 


Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated“large accelerated filer,”“accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  x             Accelerated filer  ¨             Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by a checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $1,640,624,909.$4,219,837,641.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock on March 23, 200726, 2009 was 165,084,463.167,729,688.

 


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

We are filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to revise the disclosures identified below, which were included in our proxy statement (the “2009 Proxy Statement”) for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held Tuesday, May 19, 2009, filed with the Securities and 14 isExchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 1, 2009, and incorporated by reference into Part III, hereof from portionsItem 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (the “Original Annual Report”), filed with the SEC on April 1, 2009. Pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Amendment contains the complete text of the information incorporated into Item 11, as amended.

In response to a comment letter we received from the SEC, we are amending and restating Item 11 of our Original Annual Report solely to revise the disclosure in the third sentence of the fourth paragraph under the caption “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Measuring Achievement; Payment of Bonuses,” which disclosure was originally included in our 2009 Proxy Statement. There were no changes made to the Executive Incentive Plan or the bonus criteria under that plan, which determine bonuses to our named executive officers.

Except as described above, we have not modified or updated other disclosures presented in the 2009 Proxy Statement foror the registrant’s 2007Original Annual MeetingReport. This Amendment does not amend, update or change the financial statements or any other disclosures in the Original Annual Report and does not reflect events occurring after the filing of Shareholders.the Original Annual Report. This Amendment should be read in conjunction with our filings with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Annual Report.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART IIII

Item 1.

11.
  

BusinessExecutive Compensation

  1

Item 1A.

  

Risk FactorsPART IV

  9

Item 1B.

15.
  

Unresolved Staff CommentsExhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

12

Item 2.

Properties

13

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

16

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

16
PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

16

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

  18

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsSignatures

  1920


PART III

Item 11.Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

FISCAL 2009

Name

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All
Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)

Scott A. Belair

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

Harry S. Cherken, Jr.

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

Joel S. Lawson III

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

Robert H. Strouse

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

*Represents amounts paid in cash
The FAS 123(R) value of the options granted on May 20, 2008, was $10.78 per share. The Company used a Lattice Binomial Model in Fiscal 2009. The May 20, 2008 total option value is $215,600 (20,000 shares x $10.78 per share). Fiscal 2009 option expense is $148,770 relating to the May 20, 2008 grant and $83,850 relating to the May 22, 2007 grant. The Options granted on May 22, 2007 had a FAS 123(R) value of $13.73; during fiscal year 2008 the Company used the Black Scholes Valuation Model. For a discussion of the assumptions utilized in the Lattice Binomial Model and Black Scholes Model, please see note 9 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2009.
**At the end of Fiscal 2009, all 20,000 options from the May 20, 2008 grant were not vested.

Each director who is not also an employee of the Company (“Outside Directors”) is paid two cash installments consisting of (i) a $50,000 payment following election as a Director at the applicable annual meeting of shareholders, and (ii) a $50,000 payment in February following completion of the fiscal year.

During Fiscal 2009, the Company granted, on a discretionary basis, each Outside Director the option to purchase 20,000 Common Shares under the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of the non-qualified stock options granted under the Plan was $30.495.

All directors and their immediate families are eligible to receive discounts on our merchandise through use of discount cards issued to them and in accordance with our employee merchandise discount policy.

The Board of Directors believes it is good corporate practice to periodically review and reevaluate the total compensation paid to the Company’s Outside Directors for their service on the Board of Directors, including the cash and equity components of that compensation. The Board of Directors intends to review the compensation paid to the Outside Directors following the Annual Meeting and will make any adjustments it deems appropriate.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Company Objectives

The Company’s compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and motivate executive and key employee talent in support of its primary objective of building compelling brands that connect with the customer on an emotional level. The Company believes that delivering value to the customer by excelling at ‘experiential retailing’ is the foundation for the long-term maximization of shareholder value.

Design of Compensation Program

General

In furtherance of our primary objective, our compensation program is designed to motivate executives to maximize shareholder value and grow our brands, both in the short-term and the long-term, by rewarding executives for doing so. These long standing compensation policies were designed and approved by management, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors as appropriate. We have identified the first step in attaining these objectives as having superior executives in place, and as such, our compensation program’s initial purpose is to attract new candidates and retain the ones we have. This requires our compensation to be competitive in the marketplace. The other step in attaining our objectives is to reward these executives through annual performance-based compensation based on the achievement of specific operating goals that have been determined by the Compensation Committee based on recommendations by the Chairman of the Board (the “Chairman”) and Chief Executive Officer. Moreover, through equity-based compensation, we attempt to align the compensation of our executives with the interests of the shareholders and motivate our executives to achieve the Company’s longer-term goals.

Long-Term versus Currently Paid Out Compensation

Current compensation paid to executive officers includes base salaries, which are paid periodically throughout the fiscal year, and performance bonuses, which are awarded at the end of the year. The Company’s long-term compensation has been comprised of stock options, a single restricted stock award made in fiscal year 2005, and two performance stock unit awards based on specific operating performance criteria made in fiscal year 2009. The Company has long believed that the characteristics of equity-based compensation, particularly the extended vesting periods, leverage and the deferral of taxation until exercise or vesting, are closely aligned with maximizing shareholder value and supporting its long-term growth strategies, and were favorable to the Company from both a cash flow and, prior to the adoption of FAS 123(R), an earnings statement perspective. The Company believes that the performance stock unit awards made in fiscal year 2009 share these characteristics and offer the potential for meaningful compensation for superior performance measured over an extended period of time.

The Company does not have deferred compensation plans or programs or executive retirement plans because it does not believe that such plans are the best way to support its goal of maximizing shareholder value. Furthermore, the Company believes that there are regulatory and administrative costs involved with the administration of these plans that are not warranted by the benefits they provide. As a matter of practice and philosophy, the Company has significantly limited the scope and value of perquisites provided to executive officers.

The Company’s compensation structure attempts to balance the ongoing cash requirements of the named executive officers for current income with the Company’s desire to create long-term incentives that are directly tied to growth in shareholder value. There is no pre-determined allocation between current and long-term compensation; the Compensation Committee maintains flexibility in this regard. Historically, however, equity compensation has provided the majority of income that named executives have derived from their employment with the Company. In recognition of this, the Compensation Committee takes the performance of the Company’s Common Shares (and therefore the perceived value of them to the executive) into consideration when making compensation decisions for each executive. Different positions may yield a different balance between cash and equity compensation in light of what the Compensation Committee decides will best further the Company’s objectives. For example, the brand divisional Presidents have maximum bonus potential that exceeds

base salary. This reflects the Company’s emphasis on the specific brand-related performance goals tied to the bonus for these particular executives. The Chief Executive Officer’s maximum bonus potential also exceeds base salary and is tied to overall sales and profitability metrics, while his performance stock unit grants are tied to overall profitability. For the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel, base salary exceeds the maximum bonus potential. A significant portion of both officers’ bonus plans are tied to overall Company sales and profitability metrics rather than those of specific brands because their responsibilities are generally more company-wide than brand-based. The different elements of compensation are discussed more fully below in “Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives.”

In the beginning of fiscal year 2009, citing his ownership of a substantial number of Common Shares of the Company and his confidence in the Company’s future performance, the Chairman requested that his base salary be set at $1.00 per year, and the Compensation Committee honored his request. This change in base salary reduced his overall compensation and, as a result, he is not considered a named executive officer for fiscal year 2009. The Chairman remained eligible to receive a performance bonus in fiscal year 2009, and he received $300,000 of his maximum bonus potential of $600,000.

Operation and Process

Compensation Committee

The Company’s Compensation Committee, acting pursuant to its charter, sets the amount of each element of compensation for each named executive officer. The Compensation Committee generally holds meetings at least four times a year, and compensation amounts for executive officers for the new fiscal year are generally set in the Company’s first fiscal quarter. In fiscal year 2009 there were five meetings of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee is comprised of three members, Scott A. Belair (who is the committee’s chairman), Joel S. Lawson III, and Robert H. Strouse. All members are “independent” directors, as defined by the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Compensation Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website (www.urbanoutfittersinc.com), under “Financial Overview—Corporate Governance.” The charter is reviewed by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis and revised as warranted.

Compensation Committee Consultant

The Compensation Committee directly engages PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as a compensation consultant to provide advice on executive compensation matters, and it has performed such duties in Fiscal 2009. The committee and the Board of Directors have discretion to hire and fire the consultant, as described in the Compensation Committee’s Charter. The committee determines the scope of the consultant’s review. In fiscal year 2009, the committee asked the consultant to review the elements of the Chief Executive Officer’s and other named executive officers’ compensation programs, as well as to meet with the Compensation Committee on July 28, 2008. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP sends its invoices for consulting services directly to the Compensation Committee, which reviews the invoices and then forwards them to the Company for payment.

Role of Executive Officers in Establishing Compensation

The Compensation Committee is solely responsible for compensation determinations and compensation policies applicable to executive officers and as otherwise provided in the Compensation Committee Charter. None of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman or any other executive officer makes any such determinations or set any such policies. The Compensation Committee does consult with the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer in determining compensation levels for each named executive officer, and the committee takes their assessment of the performance of each of the executive officers into consideration when weighing the factors and setting compensation. The Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer, and Chief Talent Officer may attend portions of certain meetings of the committee as needed.

The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer have the primary role in making recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the assessment and design of programs, plans and awards. They are assisted by the General Counsel, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Administrative Officer, the Chief Talent Officer, and the Executive Director of Finance, who provide them with information and input on these items.

Elements of Compensation

The Company’s compensation program is comprised of three main elements: (1) base salary, (2) performance bonus and (3) equity-based incentives, including stock options and performance stock units.

Selection of Elements

The Compensation Committee has chosen to utilize base salary, performance bonus and equity-based incentives because it believes such a compensation package, taken as a whole, is both competitive in the marketplace and reflects directly on the Company’s primary objective of maximizing shareholder value and growing its brands. The rationale for the selection of each particular element is discussed in detail below.

Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives

The Compensation Committee reviews the amounts payable to each executive under each individual element of compensation, as well as the aggregate amount of compensation to such executive, in making compensation decisions.

Base Salaries

Base salary is determined by position, experience and competitive market factors for comparable talent. Inasmuch as the main objective of the compensation plan is maximizing shareholder value, the Company generally seeks to set base salaries at or near prevailing market rates for comparable levels of responsibility in specialty retail so as to reduce the levels of committed compensation expense on the Company’s financial statements as well as the cash cost to the Company. The Company believes that it needs to offer competitive base salaries in order to retain and attract superior personnel, which is a key step in achieving its primary objectives. For fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee decided to maintain executive officer salaries at fiscal year 2009 levels, primarily due to the current economic downturn and resulting market conditions.

Performance Bonuses

The Company’s executive officers are eligible to receive cash incentive bonuses under the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan based on the achievement of specific performance targets established in advance. In determining performance objectives, the Compensation Committee sets forth specific targets that are consistent with its primary objectives. We believe that this plan presents the executive with clear objectives that, if achieved, will maximize shareholder value and further the growth of our brands, while providing commensurate rewards to the executive.

Eligibility

The Compensation Committee determines executive officer eligibility for performance bonuses during the Company’s first fiscal quarter based on the Company’s financial budgets and operating plans and the roles that the executives have in achieving those objectives.

Setting Performance Criteria and Targets

The Compensation Committee sets the performance criteria for each participant during the Company’s first fiscal quarter. The criteria may be based on the performance of the participant, a division, the Company as a whole or a subsidiary of the Company, at the committee’s discretion. Performance criteria may include, depending on the particular participant: sales, profit, return on sales, net operating profit after taxes, investment turnover, customer service indices, funds from operations, income from operations, return on assets, return on net assets, asset turnover, return on equity, return on capital, market price appreciation of shares, economic value added, total shareholder return, net income, pre-tax income, earnings per share, operating profit margin, net income margin, sales margin, cash flow, market share, inventory turnover, sales growth, net revenue growth, capacity utilization, new stores opened, customer penetration, increase in customer base, net income growth, expense control and hiring of personnel. The Compensation Committee determines performance criteria that are appropriate for each participant. The committee may also take into account the opinion of the named executive officer as to which criteria

he or she feels is the best indicator of his or her performance. The Compensation Committee, in connection with its assessment of performance criteria for fiscal year 2009, concluded that the criteria or targets do not encourage or promote inappropriate risk-taking by the participants.

Specifically, the Compensation Committee sets criteria based on whether the executive officer has merchant responsibility. The primary criteria for the Chief Executive Officer may include sales, operating profit, stores opened, return on capital, management of inventory levels, hiring goals or other goals determined by the committee. Typically, the primary criteria of the performance bonus plans for executives with merchant responsibilities, such as President of Urban Outfitters Brand or President of Free People Brand, would be sales and operating profits, number of new stores opened, customer penetration, management of inventory levels or other goals determined by the committee. For executive officers who do not have merchant responsibilities, such as the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel, the criteria generally include sales and operating profits goals, meeting or exceeding functional area budgets, functional area performance ratings, the number and timing of store openings or other goals determined by the committee.

Each performance criterion is then assigned a performance target. For example, for the criterion of “number of new stores opened,” the target would be the Company’s goal for a specified number of stores opened, consistent with the operating budget and with the brand growth strategies. Or, for the criterion of “sales and operating profits,” the target would be meeting or exceeding the Company’s financial “budget” for the fiscal year, or by meeting or exceeding “stretch” goals for the fiscal year. The thresholds for the functional area budgets are determined by the operating budget and its goal of leveraging selling, general and administrative expenses as top line revenue grows, and those for functional area performance ratings are driven by the brands’ or the Chief Executive Officer’s assessments of the functional areas.

Finally, the Compensation Committee establishes a schedule or matrix for each participant showing the maximum performance bonus (expressed as a percentage of base salary) payable for the achievement of the specified performance target. The specific amounts for each performance target are determined by assessing the profit contribution attained by meeting various targets, and measuring the compensation outcomes achieved by meeting those targets, while taking into account total compensation from base salary, bonus and stock options. The performance targets and the percentage of performance bonus subject to each performance objective for the Company’s named executive officers in fiscal year 2009 are described below in “—Measuring Achievement; Payment of Bonuses.

Role of Named Executive Officers in Determining Performance Factors

With respect to the performance bonus factors of all named executive officers, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Administrative Officer make recommendations to the Compensation Committee, which it considers when setting the performance bonus plans. None of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, or the Chief Administrative Officer has the authority to call Compensation Committee meetings or set meeting agendas themselves nor do they meet with the compensation consultant on an individual basis without the consent of the Compensation Committee or its Chairman.

Measuring Achievement; Payment of Bonuses

At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee determines the extent of achievement of the pre-established performance targets for each criterion. The level of achievement attained is applied to the schedule to determine the individual’s adjusted performance bonus percentage, which is then multiplied by the individual’s award. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to award that amount or reduce the award payable if it believes such action would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. At the end of a year, the Compensation Committee also has the ability to grant cash bonuses to non-named executive officers.

In Fiscal 2009, the Company met its goal of growing sales by more than 20% and profit by more than 25%, and its goal of meeting or exceeding its sales plan, but did not meet its goal of meeting or exceeding its profit plan. The Company did achieve its objectives for the number and timing of store openings. Overall, named executive officers realized 48.6% of their maximum achievable performance bonuses, with a range of 28% to 70% of maximum achievable bonus.

Set forth in the table below are the performance targets and the percentage of performance bonus subject to each performance objective for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the President of Urban Outfitters Brand, the President of Free People Brand and the General Counsel.

For fiscal year 2009, a portion of each named executive officer’s bonus is tied to two different measures of Company-wide sales and profit targets. The first measure is based on whether net sales for specified stores were increased from the prior year by at least 20% (the “Sales Percentage Target”) and whether profit (i.e. income from operations) was increased from the prior year by at least 25% for specified stores (the “Profit Percentage Target”). The second measure is based on whether the Company’s net sales for specified stores meet or exceed the specified dollar of approximately $1.8 billion (the “Sales Plan Target”) and whether the Company’s profit for specified stores meets or exceeds the specified dollar amount of approximately $318.5 million (the “Profit Plan Target”). Each named executive officer also has his or her own additional performance criteria, selected by the Compensation Committee based on the methodology described above in “—Setting Performance Criteria and Targets.”

Glen T. Senk – Chief Executive Officer

Bonus Criteria

Item 7A.

  Percent of Total Bonus
Potential

QuantitativeCompany meets Sales Percentage Target and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskProfit Percentage Target(1)

  3250

Company meets Sales Plan Target and Profit Plan Target(2)

25

Company exceeds Sales Plan Target by more than 2% and Profit Plan Target by more than 5%(2)

25
100

(1)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales increased by more than 20% and actual profit increased by more than 25%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion exceeded the Sales Plan Target, but actual profit of approximately $309.8 million did not meet or exceed the Profit Plan Target. Accordingly, this performance objective was not met.

John E. Kyees – Chief Financial Officer

Bonus Criteria

Item 8.

  Percent of Total Bonus
Potential

Financial StatementsCompany meets Sales Percentage Target and Supplementary DataProfit Percentage Target(1)

  3320

Company meets Sales Plan Target and Profit Plan Target(2)

30

Individual Goals(3)

50
100

(1)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales increased by more than 20% and actual profit increased by more than 25%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.

(2)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion exceeded the Sales Plan Target, but actual profit of approximately $309.8 million did not meet the Profit Plan Target. Accordingly, this performance objective was not met.
(3)These four individual goals include (i) meeting or exceeding a target percentage for reducing “shrink” (i.e. the amount of inventory lost as a result of theft or damage); (ii) planning and executing the expansion of a distribution center; (iii) managing all operational areas of responsibility, which is further broken down to include (A) for the call center, the achievement of specified service levels and functioning at or below the call center budget, (B) for the distribution and fulfillment function, the achievement of specified service levels and meeting budget requirements, (C) for the finance function, the successful completion of financial reports on time and accurately, as well as meeting its budget requirements, and (D) for the loss prevention function, the achievement of specified target levels for loss prevention/merchandise control and operating within budget; and (iv) achieving a tax rate of 36% or better. Mr. Kyees attained each of these individual goals. The Compensation Committee expected that these individual goals would be challenging and achievable only through superior performance.

Tedford G. Marlow – President, Urban Outfitters Brand

Bonus Criteria(1)

Item 9.

  Maximum Percent of Total
Bonus Potential

Changes inCompany meets Sales Percentage Target and Disagreements with Accountants on AccountingProfit Percentage Target and Financial DisclosureUrban Outfitters Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(2)(3)

  33
20 

Item 9A.

ControlsCompany exceeds Sales Plan Target by more than 2% and ProceduresUrban Outfitters Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(4)

  33
20 %(3)

Item 9B.

Other InformationCompany exceeds Profit Plan Target by more than 5% and Urban Outfitters Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(5)

  35
PART III
40 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceIndividual Goals(6)

  36
20 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

38

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

38

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

38

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

38
PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

39
  

Signatures100 

(1)41The executive’s bonus criteria are broken down into both “budget” and “stretch” goals. This table includes the “stretch” goals and the maximum bonus potential if each “stretch” goal is met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, the Company’s actual net sales increased by more than 20% and the Company’s actual profit increased by more than 25%. Actual Urban Outfitters Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by more than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan target by more than 5%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(3)
In setting the fiscal year 2009 objectives, the Compensation Committee believed that exceeding the Urban Outfitters Brand sales plan target by more than 2% and profit plan target by more than 5% would be challenging and achievable only through superior performance. This difficulty was magnified by the adverse impact of economic conditions in the fourth fiscal quarter.
(4)F-1By achieving actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion, the Company did not exceed its Sales Plan Target by more than 2%. Therefore, Mr. Marlow did not satisfy the “stretch” goal indicated in this row. However, the Company did exceed its Sales Plan Target by less than 2% which allowed him to meet his applicable “budget” goal. Accordingly he received a payment equal to 10% of his maximum potential bonus for this performance objective.


(5)By achieving actual profit of approximately $309.8 million, the Company did not meet or exceed its Profit Plan Target. Therefore, Mr. Marlow was not able to meet his “stretch” or “budget” goal for this performance objective and he did not receive the applicable bonus.
(6)These three individual goals are related to the Urban Outfitters Brand and include (i) improving the average dollar inventory turn by a minimum period of time versus the previous year; (ii) increasing the penetration of Urban Outfitters own brand apparel to a specified demographic market; and (iii) increasing profitability in a specified geographic market. Mr. Marlow was able to achieve goals (i) and (ii), and therefore he received a payment equal to 13.4% of his maximum bonus potential for this goal. The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Marlow’s individual goals to be challenging and achievable only through superior performance.

This Securities and Exchange Commission filing is being made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain matters contained in this filing may constitute forward-looking statements. When used in this Form 10-K, the words “project,” “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Any one, or all, of the following factors could cause actual financial results to differ materially from those financial results mentioned in the forward-looking statements: the difficulty in predicting and responding to shifts in fashion trends, changes in the level of competitive pricing and promotional activity and other industry factors, overall economic and market conditions and the resultant impact on consumer spending patterns, any effects of terrorist acts or war, availability of suitable retail space for expansion, timing of store openings, seasonal fluctuations in gross sales, the departure of one or more key senior managers, import risks, including potential disruptions and changes in duties, tariffs and quotas and other risks identified in our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We disclaim any intent or obligation to update forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that actual results may differ materially from any projected results expressed or implied therein.Margaret Hayne – President, Free People Brand

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “Urban Outfitters,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our company” refer to Urban Outfitters, Inc., together with its subsidiaries.Bonus Criteria(1)

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

We are an innovative lifestyle merchandising company that operates specialty retail stores under the Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People brands, as well as a wholesale segment under the Free People brand. We have over 35 years of experience creating and managing retail stores that offer highly differentiated collections of fashion apparel, accessories and home goods in inviting and dynamic store settings. Our core strategy is to provide unified store environments that establish emotional bonds with the customer. In addition to our retail stores, we offer our products and market our brands directly to the consumer through our e-commerce web sites,www.urbanoutfitters.com,www.anthropologie.com, www.freepeople.com andwww.urbanoutfitters.co.uk and also through our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People catalogs. We have achieved compounded annual sales growth of approximately 29.0% over the past five years, with sales of approximately $1.2 billion in fiscal 2007.

We opened our first store in 1970 near the University of Pennsylvania campus in Philadelphia. We were incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1976, and opened our second store in Harvard Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1980. The first Anthropologie store opened in a suburb of Philadelphia in October 1992. We started doing business in Europe in 1998, with our first European store located in London. We opened our first Free People store in the Garden State Plaza Mall in Paramus, New Jersey in November 2002.

Our fiscal year ends on January 31. All references in this discussion to our fiscal years refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, our fiscal 2007 ended on January 31, 2007.

Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our investor relations web site,www.urbanoutfittersinc.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. We will voluntarily provide electronic or paper copies (other than exhibits) of our filings free of charge upon written request. You may also obtain any materials we file with, or furnish to, the SEC on its web site atwww.sec.gov.

Retail Segment

Urban Outfitters. Urban Outfitters targets young adults aged 18 to 30 through its unique merchandise mix and compelling store environment. We have established a reputation with these young adults, who are culturally sophisticated, self-expressive and concerned with acceptance by their peer group. The product offering includes women’s and men’s fashion apparel, footwear and accessories, as well as an eclectic mix of apartment wares and gifts. Apartment wares range from rugs, pillows and shower curtains to books, candles and novelties. Stores average approximately 9,700 square feet of selling space, and typically carry 30,000 to 35,000 stock keeping units, or SKUs. Our stores are located in large metropolitan areas, select university communities, specialty centers and enclosed malls. Our stores accommodate our customers’ propensity not only to shop, but also to congregate with their peers. In fiscal 2007, we circulated approximately 11.4 million Urban Outfitters catalogs in an effort to expand our distribution channels and increase brand awareness. We plan to expand circulation to approximately 12.0 million catalogs in fiscal 2008. As of January 31, 2007, we operated 106 Urban Outfitters stores in North America and Europe, as well as thewww.urbanoutfitters.comandwww.urbanoutfitters.co.uk web sites and the Urban Outfitters catalog. We plan to open approximately 16 new Urban Outfitters stores in fiscal 2008. Urban Outfitters’ North American and European store sales accounted for approximately 38.9% and 5.8% of consolidated net sales, respectively, for fiscal 2007.

Anthropologie. Anthropologie tailors its merchandise and inviting store environment to sophisticated and contemporary women aged 30 to 45. Anthropologie’s unique and eclectic product assortment includes women’s casual apparel and accessories, home furnishings and a diverse array of gifts and decorative items. The home furnishings range from furniture, rugs, lighting and antiques to table top items, bedding and gifts. Stores average approximately 7,600 square feet of selling space, typically carry 20,000 to 25,000 SKUs and are located in specialty retail centers, upscale street locations and enclosed malls. During fiscal 2007, we circulated approximately 21.8 million catalogs and plan to modestly expand circulation to approximately 21.9 million catalogs in fiscal 2008. As of January 31, 2007, we operated 93 Anthropologie stores in the United States, as well as thewww.anthropologie.com web site and the Anthropologie catalog. We plan to open approximately 16 new Anthropologie stores in fiscal 2008. Anthropologie’s store sales accounted for approximately 35.9% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

Free People. Our Free People retail stores primarily offer Free People branded merchandise targeted to young contemporary women aged 25 to 30. Free People offers a unique merchandise mix of casual women’s apparel, accessories and gifts. Our first Free People retail store opened in November 2002 and is located in the Garden State Plaza Mall in Paramus, New Jersey. We opened two new Free People stores during fiscal 2007. Free People retail stores average approximately 1,600 square feet and carry approximately 1,600 SKUs. The retail channels of Free People expose both

our wholesale accounts and retail customers to the full Free People product assortment and store environment. During fiscal 2007, we circulated approximately 3.3 million catalogs and plan to expand circulation to approximately 4.3 million catalogs in fiscal 2008. As of January 31, 2007, we operated eight Free People stores in the United States, as well as thewww.freepeople.com web site and the Free People catalog. Free People retail store sales accounted for less than 1% of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

Catalogs and Web Sites

In March 1998, Anthropologie introduced a direct-to-consumer catalog offering select merchandise most of which is also available in our Anthropologie stores. During fiscal 2007, Anthropologie catalog circulation was approximately 21.8 million. We believe that this catalog has been instrumental in helping to build the Anthropologie brand identity with our target customers. We plan to modestly expand catalog circulation to approximately 21.9 million during fiscal 2008 and intend to increase the level of catalog circulation over the next few years.

Anthropologie operates a web site that accepts orders directly from consumers. The web site,www.anthropologie.com, debuted in December 1998. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar array of apparel, accessories, household and gift merchandise as found in the stores. As with our catalog, we believe that the web site increases Anthropologie’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the traffic of Anthropologie’s store operations.

In March 2003, Urban Outfitters introduced a direct-to-consumer catalog offering selected merchandise, much of which is also available in our Urban Outfitters stores. During fiscal 2007, Urban Outfitters catalog circulation was approximately 11.4 million. We believe this catalog has expanded our distribution channels and increased brand awareness. We plan to modestly expand catalog circulation to approximately 12.0 million during fiscal 2008 and intend to increase the level of catalog circulation over the next few years.

Urban Outfitters also operates a web site that accepts orders directly from consumers. The web site,www.urbanoutfitters.com, was launched in May 2000. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in the stores. As with the Urban Outfitters catalog, we believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with its target customers, as well as helps to support the traffic of Urban Outfitters store operations.

In August 2006, Urban Outfitters launched a web site targeting our European customers. The web site,www.urbanoutfitters.co.uk, captures the spirit of our European stores by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in the stores. Fulfillment is provided from a third-party distribution center located in the United Kingdom. We believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with its European target customers as well as helps to support our Urban Outfitters European store operations.

We successfully launched the Free People web site,www.freepeople.com, in September 2004. The web site exposes consumers to the product assortment found at Free People retail stores as well as all of the Free People wholesale offerings. The Free People catalog was introduced in October 2005. We circulated approximately 3.3 million catalogs during fiscal 2007. We plan to modestly expand catalog circulation to approximately 4.3 million during fiscal 2008 and intend to increase the level of catalog circulation over the next few years.

Increases in our catalog circulation are driven by our evaluation of the response rate to each individual catalog. Based upon that evaluation, we will adjust the frequency and circulation of our catalog portfolio as needed. In addition, we evaluate the buying pattern of our direct customers to determine those customers who respond to our catalog mailings. We also utilize the services of list rental companies to identify potential customers that will receive future catalogs.

Direct-to-consumer sales were approximately 12.6% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

Wholesale Segment

The Free People wholesale division was established in 1984 to develop, in conjunction with Urban Outfitters, private label apparel lines of young women’s casual wear that could be effectively sold at attractive prices in Urban Outfitters stores. In order to achieve minimum production lots, Free People wholesale began selling to other retailers throughout the United States. Free People’s range of tops, bottoms, sweaters and dresses are sold worldwide through approximately 1,500 better department and specialty stores, including Bloomingdale’s, Lord & Taylor, Nordstrom, Parisian, Urban Outfitters and its own Free People stores. Free People currently sells its merchandise under theFree People label. We also distribute our Free People products in certain department stores using a shop-within-shops sales model. We believe that the shop-within-shops model allows for a more complete merchandising of our Free People products and will give us greater freedom in differentiating the presentation of our products and further strengthening our brand image. We monitor the styles and products that are popular with our wholesale customers to give us insight into current fashion trends that help us better serve our retail customers. Free People presently maintains wholesale sales and showroom facilities in New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago. Free People wholesale sales accounted for approximately 6% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

In addition to selling its merchandise to specialty retailers, Free People wholesale also contributes production sourcing to our retail segment. Free People employs its own senior and creative management staff, but shares support services with the retail segment.

Store Environment

We create a unified environment in our stores that establishes an emotional bond with the customer. Every element of the environment is tailored to the aesthetic preferences of our target customers. Through creative design, much of the existing retail space is modified to incorporate a mosaic of fixtures, finishes and revealed architectural details. In our stores, merchandise is integrated into a variety of creative vignettes and displays designed to offer our customers an entire look at a distinct lifestyle. This dynamic visual merchandising and display technique provides the connection among the store design, the merchandise and the customer. Essential components of the ambience of each store may include playing music that appeals to our target customers, using unique signage and employing a staff that understands and identifies with the target customer.

Anthropologie considers it important to create an individualized and tailored store shopping experience for each customer. By providing an inviting and pleasant shopping atmosphere and an attentive sales staff, including in-store customer care managers, we strive to create a sense of community in our Anthropologie stores that encourages our target customers to linger and spend time exploring our stores and product offerings. Anthropologie stores are often placed in unique and

non-traditional retail locations. A majority of our Anthropologie stores opened during fiscal 2007 were located in specialty retail centers and upscale street locations. We plan a similar Anthropologie location expansion strategy in fiscal 2008.

Our Urban Outfitters stores are often located in unconventional retail spaces, including a former movie theater, bank and stock exchange. A majority of our Urban Outfitters stores that opened in fiscal 2007 were located in specialty retail centers, upscale street locations and enclosed shopping malls. We are planning a similar Urban Outfitters location expansion strategy in fiscal 2008.

Our Free People retail stores opened to date are located in enclosed shopping malls and specialty retail centers. We expect Free People stores opening in fiscal 2008 to be located in traditional enclosed shopping malls, upscale street locations and specialty retail centers.

Buying Operations

Maintaining a constant flow of fashionable merchandise for our retail segment is critically important to the on-going performance of our stores and direct-to-consumer operations. We maintain our own buying groups that select and develop products to satisfy our target customers and provide us with the appropriate amount of products at the correct time. Merchandise managers may supervise several buyers and assistant buyers. Our buyers stay in touch with the evolving tastes of their target customers by shopping at major trade markets, attending national and regional trade shows and staying current with mass media influences, including music, video, film, magazines and pop culture.

Merchandise

Our Urban Outfitters stores, web sites and catalog offer a wide array of eclectic merchandise, including women’s and men’s fashion apparel, footwear and accessories, and apartment wares and gifts. Product offerings at our Anthropologie stores, web site and catalog include women’s casual apparel and accessories, as well as home furnishings and an eclectic array of gifts and decorative accessories for the home, garden, bed and bath. Our Free People retail stores, web site and catalog offer a showcase for casual apparel, accessories and gifts, primarily developed and designed by our Free People wholesale division. Our merchandise is continuously updated to appeal to our target customers’ changing tastes and is supplied by a large number of domestic and foreign vendors, with new shipments of merchandise arriving at our stores several times a week. The wide breadth of merchandise offered by our retail segment includes national brands, as well as exclusive private label merchandise developed and designed by Free People, Urban Outfitters and Anthropologie. This selection allows us to offer fashionable merchandise and to differentiate our product mix from that of traditional department stores, as well as that of other specialty and direct-to-consumer retailers. Private label merchandise generally yields higher gross profit margins than brand name merchandise, and helps to keep our product offerings current and unique.

The ever-changing mix of products available to our customers allows us to adapt our merchandise to prevailing fashion trends, and, together with the inviting atmosphere of our stores, encourages our core customers to visit our stores frequently.

We seek to select price points for our merchandise that are consistent with the spending patterns of our target customers. As such, our stores carry merchandise at a wide array of price points that may vary considerably within product categories.

Store Operations

We have organized our retail store operations by brand into geographic areas or districts, each with a district manager. District managers are responsible for several stores and monitor and supervise individual store managers. Each store manager is responsible for overseeing the daily operations of one of our stores. In addition to a store manager, the staff of a typical Urban Outfitters and Anthropologie store includes a visual manager, several department managers and a full and part-time sales and visual staff. The staff of a typical Anthropologie store may also include a customer care manager who helps tailor the shopping experience to the needs of Anthropologie’s target customers. Our Free People retail stores include a store manager, a visual coordinator and full and part-time sales staff.

An essential requirement for the success of our stores is our ability to attract, train and retain talented, highly motivated store managers, visual managers and other key employees. In addition to management training programs for both newly hired and existing employees, we have a number of retention programs that offer qualitative and quantitative performance-based incentives to district-level managers, store-level managers and full-time sales associates.

Marketing and Promotion

We believe that highly visible store locations, creative store design, broad merchandise selection and visual presentation are key enticements for customers to enter and explore our stores and buy merchandise. Consequently, we rely on these factors, as well as the brand recognition created by our direct marketing activities, to draw customers into our stores, rather than on traditional forms of advertising such as print, radio and television media. Marketing activities for each of our retail concepts include special event promotions and a variety of public relations activities designed to create community awareness of our stores and products.

Suppliers

To serve our target customers and to recognize changes in fashion trends and seasonality, we purchase merchandise from numerous foreign and domestic vendors. To the extent that our vendors are located overseas or rely on overseas sources for a large portion of their merchandise, any event causing a disruption of imports, such as the imposition of import restrictions, financial or political instability in any of the countries in which goods we purchase are manufactured, or trade restrictions in the form of tariffs or quotas, or both, could adversely affect our business. During fiscal 2007, we did business with approximately 2,000 vendors. No single vendor accounted for more than 10.0% of merchandise purchased during that time. While certain of our vendors have limited financial resources and production capabilities, we do not believe that the loss of any one vendor would have a material effect on our business.

Company Operations

Distribution. The majority of merchandise purchased by our retail businesses is shipped directly to our 191,000 square foot distribution center in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. We own the Pennsylvania facility, which has an advanced computerized materials handling system, and is approximately 65 miles from our home offices in Philadelphia.

In March 2005, we executed a long-term operating lease to utilize an additional 459,000 square foot distribution center located in Edgefield County, South Carolina. Currently, this facility houses the majority of merchandise purchased by our wholesale and direct-to-consumer operations. This building significantly expands our distribution capacity and provides us with future opportunities for additional growth as it becomes necessary. This facility also utilizes a state-of-the-art and fully functional tilt tray sorter. The property currently accommodates all direct-to-consumer fulfillment related functions, including inventory warehousing, receiving, customer contact operations and customer shipping. We believe this additional space and equipment allows us to significantly improve our fulfillment efficiency. We can expand this space as it pertains to the additional growth requirements of both our retail and wholesale businesses.

We also utilize a distribution facility in Reno, Nevada operated by a third-party. This facility services our stores in the western United States at a favorable freight cost per unit, and provides faster turnaround from selected vendors. We plan to expand and bring this function in-house in fiscal 2008 due to our growing retail store network. In addition, we utilize a portion of the Toronto Urban Outfitters store as a wholesale distribution facility in Canada, and have a distribution center in Essex, England to service our current and near-term needs for stores in Europe.

Information Systems. Very early in our growth, we recognized the need for high-quality information in order to manage merchandise planning/buying, inventory management and control functions. We invested in a retail software package that met our processing and reporting requirements. We utilize point-of-sale register systems connected by a digital subscriber line (DSL) network to our home offices. These systems provide for register efficiencies, timely customer checkout and instant back office access to register information, as well as for daily updates of sales, inventory data and price changes. Our direct-to-consumer operations, which include the Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters catalogs and retail web sites, maintain separate software systems that manage the merchandise and customer information for our in-house customer contact center and fulfillment functions. We are currently testing and expect to launch a new, more functional web platform during fiscal 2008 that will expand capacity for additional traffic and sales through the web. The Free People wholesale segment uses a separate software system for customer service, order entry and allocations, production planning and inventory management. During fiscal 2007, we successfully completed installation of a new wholesale customer service system that provides significantly improved functionality and flexibility to help serve our customers. This system has the capability to handle additional workload related to increased order volume and will better suit us over the long term to meet its forward growth needs. We have contracted with a nationally recognized company to provide disaster-recovery services with respect to our key systems.

During fiscal 2007, we also completed the upgrade of our existing point of sale platform at our North American locations. This upgrade included the replacement of our existing register software, replacement of registers and related hardware and the addition of radio frequency equipment to be utilized in the store receiving and operations areas. We believe this upgrade allows us to process customer transactions more quickly and efficiently, while reducing existing administration. This initiative will also result in advanced flexibility and customer service in the areas of locating inventory and accessing the direct-to-consumer channel within our retail stores. This new platform establishes better long-term technology resources and provides the opportunity and required infrastructure to enable our brands to implement a Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) system during fiscal 2008.

Competition

The specialty retail, direct-to-consumer and the wholesale apparel businesses are each highly competitive. Our retail stores compete on the basis of, among other things, the location of our stores, the breadth, quality, style, and availability of merchandise, the level of customer service offered and merchandise price. Although we feel the eclectic mix of products offered in our retail stores helps differentiate us, it also means that our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People stores compete against a wide variety of smaller, independent specialty stores, as well as department stores and national specialty chains. Many of our competitors have substantially greater name recognition as well as financial, marketing and other resources. Our Anthropologie and Free People stores also face competition from small boutiques that offer an individualized shopping experience similar to the one we strive to provide to our target customers. In addition, some of our suppliers offer products directly to consumers and certain of our competitors.

Along with certain retail segment factors noted above, other key competitive factors for our direct-to-consumer operations include the success or effectiveness of customer mailing lists, response rates, catalog presentation, merchandise delivery and web site design and availability. Our direct-to-consumer operations compete against numerous catalogs and web sites, which may have a greater volume of circulation and web traffic.

Our Free People wholesale business competes with numerous wholesale companies based on the quality, fashion and price of our wholesale product offerings. Many of our wholesale business competitors’ products have a wider distribution network. In addition, certain of our wholesale competitors have greater name recognition and financial and other resources.

Trademarks and Service Marks

We are the registered owner in the United States of certain service marks and trademarks, including “Urban Outfitters”, “Anthropologie”, “Urban Renewal”, “Free People”, “Co-Operative”, “Ecote”, “Hei-Hei”, “Fink”, “Stapleford”, “Character Hero”, “BDG Guaranteed Tough”, “Brand: All-Son”, “Charlie & Robin”, “Darling Blue”, “Deletta”, “Elevenses”, “Ett Twa”, “Hi-Brow”, “Kimchi & Blue”, “Little Yellow Button”, “Maeve”, “Oiseau”, “Ric-Rac”, “Sitwell”, “Sleeping on Snow”, “Sparkle & Fade”, “Sparrow”, “Standard Cloth Washington Street”, “Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday”, “UO”, “Idra” and “Urbn.com.” Each mark is renewable indefinitely, contingent upon continued use at the time of renewal. In addition, we currently have pending registration applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office covering certain other marks. We also own marks that have been registered in foreign countries, and have applications for marks pending in additional foreign countries as well. We regard our marks as important to our business due to their name recognition with our customers. We are not aware of any valid claims of infringement or challenges to our right to use any of our marks in the United States.

Employees

As of January 31, 2007, we employed approximately 8,400 people, approximately 46% of whom are full-time employees. The number of part-time employees fluctuates depending on seasonal needs. Of our total employees, 2% work in the wholesale segment and the remaining 98% work in our retail segment. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relations with our employees are excellent.

Financial Information about Operations

We aggregate our operations into two reportable segments, the retail segment and the wholesale segment. See Note 12, “Segment Reporting,” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Financial Information about Geographical Areas

See Note 12, “Segment Reporting,” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding net sales from domestic and foreign operation and long-lived assets.

Seasonality

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. See Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Seasonality and Quarterly Results for additional information.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business segments are sensitive to economic conditions, consumer spending, shifts in fashion and industry and demographic conditions.

We are subject to seasonal variations and face numerous business risk factors. Consumer purchases of discretionary retail items and specialty retail products, including our products, may decline during recessionary periods and also may decline at other times when disposable income is lower. A prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. There is a risk that consumer sentiment may decline due to economic and/or geo-political factors, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.

We rely heavily on our ability to identify changes in fashion.

Customer tastes and fashion trends are volatile and can change rapidly. Our success depends in part on our ability to effectively predict and respond to changing fashion tastes and consumer demands, and to translate market trends into appropriate, saleable product offerings. Our inability to effectively determine these changes may lead to higher seasonal inventory levels and a future need to increase markdowns to liquidate our inventory. Compared to our retail segments, our wholesale business is more sensitive to changes in fashion trends because of longer lead times in the manufacture and sale of its apparel. While we do not plan for mistakes in our fashion offering selections, our fashion decisions constitute a material risk and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be successful in expanding our business and opening new retail stores.

Our growth strategy depends on our ability to open and operate new retail stores on a profitable basis. Our operating complexity will increase as our store base grows, and we may face challenges in managing our future growth. Such growth will require that we continue to expand and improve our operating capabilities, and expand, train and manage our employee base. We may be unable to hire and

train a sufficient number of qualified personnel or successfully manage our growth. Our expansion prospects also depend on a number of other factors, many of which are beyond our control, including, among other things, competition, the availability of financing for capital expenditures and working capital requirements, the availability of suitable sites for new store locations on acceptable lease terms, and the availability of inventory. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our store expansion goals, nor can there be any assurance that our newly opened stores will achieve revenue or profitability levels comparable to those of our existing stores in the time periods estimated by us, or at all. If our stores fail to achieve, or are unable to sustain, acceptable revenue and profitability levels, we may incur significant costs associated with closing those stores.

Existing and increased competition in the specialty retail, direct-to-consumer and wholesale apparel businesses may reduce our net revenues, profits and market share.

The specialty retail, direct-to-consumer and the wholesale apparel businesses are each highly competitive. Our retail stores compete on the basis of, among other things, the location of our stores, the breadth, quality, style, and availability of merchandise, the level of customer service offered and merchandise price. Our Anthropologie and Free People stores also face competition from small boutiques that offer an individualized shopping experience similar to the one we strive to provide to our target customers. In addition, some of our suppliers offer products directly to consumers and certain of our competitors. Our Free People wholesale business competes with numerous wholesale companies based on the quality, fashion and price of our wholesale product offerings, many of whose products have wider distribution than ours. Many of our competitors have substantially greater name recognition as well as financial, marketing and other resources. We cannot assure you that we will continue to be able to compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Our expansion into markets served by our competitors and entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on key personnel and may not be able to retain or replace these employees or recruit additional qualified personnel, which would harm our business.

We believe that we have benefited substantially from the leadership and experience of our senior executives, including our Chairman, President and co-founder, Richard A. Hayne, and the President of Anthropologie, Inc., Glen T. Senk. The loss of the services of any of our senior executives could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects, as we may not be able to find suitable management personnel to replace departing executives on a timely basis. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Hayne, Mr. Senk or any of our other key personnel. In addition, as our business expands, we believe that our future success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. There is a high level of competition for personnel in the retail industry. Our inability to meet our staffing requirements in the future, at costs that are favorable to us, or at all, could impair our ability to increase revenue and could otherwise harm our business.

We could be materially and adversely affected if any of our distribution centers are shut down.

We operate three distribution facilities worldwide to support our retail and wholesale business segments in the United States, Western Europe and Canada, and for fulfillment of catalog and web site orders. We have also engaged a third-party to operate an additional distribution facility in Reno, Nevada to service our stores in the western United States and utilize a portion of the Toronto Urban Outfitters store as a wholesale distribution facility in Canada. The merchandise purchased for our retail operation is shipped directly to our distribution centers in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and Reno, Nevada while merchandise purchased for our direct-to-consumer and wholesale operations is shipped directly to our distribution center in Edgefield County, South Carolina. If any of our distribution centers were to shut down for any reason the other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands. As a result, we could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to our stores during the time it takes for us to reopen or replace the center.

We rely significantly on foreign sources of production.

We receive a substantial portion of our apparel and other merchandise from foreign sources, both purchased directly in foreign markets and indirectly through domestic vendors with foreign sources. To the extent that our vendors are located overseas or rely on overseas sources for a large portion of their products, any event causing a disruption of imports, including the imposition of import restrictions, war and acts of terrorism could adversely affect our business. If imported goods become difficult or impossible to bring into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be adversely affected. The flow of merchandise from our vendors could also be adversely affected by financial or political instability in any of the countries in which the goods we purchase are manufactured, if the instability affects the production or export of merchandise from those countries. Trade restrictions in the form of tariffs or quotas, or both, applicable to the products we sell could also affect the importation of those products and could increase the cost and reduce the supply of products available to us, In addition, decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could increase the cost of products we purchase from overseas vendors.

Our operating results fluctuate from period to period.

Our business experiences seasonal fluctuations in net sales and operating income, with a significant portion of operating income typically realized during the five-month period from August 1 to December 31 of each year (the back-to-school and holiday periods). Any decrease in sales or margins during this period, or in the availability of working capital needed in the months preceding this period, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Seasonal fluctuations also affect our inventory levels, as we usually order merchandise in advance of peak selling periods and sometimes before new fashion trends are confirmed by customer purchases. We must carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the back-to-school and holiday selling periods. If we are not successful in selling our inventory during this period, we may be forced to rely on markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of the inventory or we may not be able to sell the inventory at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights.

We believe that our trademarks and service marks are important to our success and our competitive position due to their name recognition with our customers. We devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our trademarks and service marks on a worldwide basis. In order to more effectively protect them from infringement and to defend against claims of infringement, the marks are owned by separate subsidiaries whose purpose is to maintain and manage existing and future marks, thereby increasing their value to the company. We are not aware of any valid claims of infringement or challenges to our right to use any of our trademarks and service marks in the United States. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the actions we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks and service marks will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as a violation of the trademarks, service marks and proprietary rights of others. Also, others may assert rights in, or ownership of, trademarks and other proprietary rights of ours and we may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

War, acts of terrorism, or the threat of either may negatively impact availability of merchandise and otherwise adversely impact our business.

In the event of war or acts of terrorism, or if either are threatened, our ability to obtain merchandise available for sale in our stores may be negatively impacted. A substantial portion of our merchandise is imported from other countries, see “We rely significantly on foreign sources of production”on page 8. If commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our distribution centers and stores, as well as fulfilling catalog and web site orders. In the event of war or additional acts of terrorism, or the threat of either, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our stores, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be successful in introducing additional store concepts.

We may, from time to time, seek to develop and introduce new concepts or brands in addition to our existing Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People brands. Our ability to succeed in these new concepts could require significant capital expenditures and management attention. Additionally, any new concept is subject to certain risks, including customer acceptance, competition, product differentiation, challenges relating to economies of scale in merchandise sourcing and the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, including management and designers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and grow these or any other new concepts to a point where they will become profitable, or generate positive cash flow. If we cannot successfully develop and grow these new concepts, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

We have no outstanding comments with the staff of the SEC.

Item 2. Properties

In August 2006, we moved and consolidated our home office into several buildings on one campus in the historic core of the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Navy Yard. This acquisition allows for a more efficient operation of our Philadelphia-based offices and will support our growth needs for at least the next ten years. The property located at 5000 South Broad Street in Philadelphia is approximately five miles from our previous Philadelphia-based home offices. We currently occupy approximately 282,000 square feet at the Navy Yard. Options on several adjacent buildings are also available for at least the next ten years to allow for additional expansion if necessary. We spent approximately $104.3 million on improvements made to our offices at the Navy Yard as of January 31, 2007. The expenditures to improve our Navy Yard facilities were capitalized and are being depreciated based on the useful life of the improvements and fixtures.

Our customer contact center is located in Edgefield County, South Carolina as part of our 459,000 square foot distribution center, and occupies approximately 16,000 square feet. Our office in Europe is located at 24 Market Place in London and occupies approximately 6,900 square feet of space. Our home offices and customer contact facilities are leased properties with varying lease term expirations through 2016. We own a 191,000 square foot distribution center in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. We also utilize a distribution facility in Reno, Nevada operated by a third-party. For more information on our distribution center properties, see Item 1: Business—Company Operations—Distribution. We believe that our facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition. In fiscal 2008, we anticipate securing our own distribution center on the west coast of the United States to support our western stores. We expect the facility will be financed through an operating lease, however, we expect to spend $3 to $5 million on equipment and other improvements.

All of our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People stores are leased and are well maintained and in good operating condition. Our retail stores are typically leased for a term of ten years with renewal options for an additional five to ten years. Total estimated selling square feet for stores open, under lease at January 31, 2007, by Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People was approximately 1,015,000, 708,000 and 13,000, respectively. The average store selling square feet is approximately 9,700 for Urban Outfitters, 7,600 for Anthropologie and 1,600 for Free People. Selling square feet can sometimes change due to floor moves, use of staircases, cash register configuration and other factors. The following table shows the location of each of our existing retail stores, as of January 31, 2007:

Urban Outfitters Stores

 

Maximum Percent of Total
Bonus Potential

LOCATIONCompany meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage Target and Free People Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(2)(3)

  20

LOCATIONCompany exceeds Sales Plan Target by more than 2% and Free People Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(4)

  LOCATION20LOCATION

ArizonaCompany exceeds Profit Plan Target by more than 5% and Free People Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%

Tempe

Tucson

Scottsdale

California

Berkeley

Burbank

Costa Mesa

Fresno

Irvine

Los Angeles

Pasadena

Rancho Cucamonga

Santa Cruz

San Diego

San Francisco

San José

San Luis Obispo

Santa Barbara

Santa Monica

Simi Valley

Studio City

Thousand Oaks

Torrance

Westwood

Colorado

Boulder

Denver

Lone Tree

Connecticut

New Haven

Florida

Miami

Miami Beach

Orlando

Palm Beach Gardens

South Miami

Tampa

Georgia

Atlanta

Illinois

Chicago

Clark St.

North Rush St.

South State St.

Milwaukee Ave.

Evanston

Oak Brook

Schaumburg

Indiana

Bloomington

Kansas

Lawrence

Louisiana

New Orleans

Massachusetts

Boston

Newbury St.

Faneuil Hall

Cambridge

Michigan

Ann Arbor

East Lansing

Troy

Minnesota

Bloomington

Minneapolis

Missouri

Kansas City

St. Louis

Nevada

Las Vegas

Desert Passage

Mandalay Bay

New Jersey

Montclair

New York

Garden City

New York

Chelsea

New York (Cont.)
The East Side
Midtown
SoHo
Queens
The West Side
The Upper West Side

North Carolina
Charlotte
Durham

Ohio
Cincinnati
Columbus
Westlake

Oregon
Portland
Tigard

Pennsylvania
Ardmore
King of Prussia
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
West Philadelphia

Rhode Island
Providence

South Carolina
Charleston

Texas
Austin
Dallas
Northpark Center
East Mockingbird Lane
Houston
University Blvd.
The Galleria
Spring

Vermont
Burlington(3)(5)

  40

VirginiaIndividual Goals
McLean(6)

20
Richmond100

 

Washington
Seattle
Broadway East
Fifth Ave.
Lynnwood

Washington D.C.
Chinatown
Georgetown

Wisconsin
Madison

Canada
Montréal
Toronto
West Edmonton

England
Birmingham
London
Kensington High St.
Oxford St.
Covent Garden
Manchester

Ireland
Dublin

Scotland
Glasgow

Denmark
Copenhagen

Sweden
Stockholm

(1)The executive’s bonus criteria are broken down into both “budget” and “stretch” goals. This table includes the “stretch” goals and the maximum bonus potential if each “stretch” goal is met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, the Company’s actual net sales increased by more than 20% and the Company’s actual profit increased by more than 25%. Actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan target by less than 5%. Accordingly, the performance objective for the “stretch” goal was not met, but the performance objective for the “budget” goal was met. Therefore, Ms. Hayne was eligible to receive half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective, which she did.
(3)In setting the fiscal year 2009 objectives, the Compensation Committee believed that exceeding the Free People Brand sales plan target by more than 2% and profit plan target by more than 5% would be very challenging and achievable only through outstanding performance. This difficulty was magnified by the adverse impact of economic conditions in the fourth fiscal quarter.
(4)By achieving actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion, the Company exceeded its Sales Plan Target but did not exceed it by more than 2%. In addition, actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan by less than 5%. Due to these results, Ms. Hayne’s performance objective for the “stretch” goal was not met, but the performance objective for the “budget” goal was met. Therefore, Ms. Hayne received half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective.
(5)Actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan by less than 5%. Therefore, Ms. Hayne was eligible to receive half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective. However, by achieving actual profit of approximately $309.8 million, the Company did not exceed its Profit Plan Target, and therefore, she did not receive a bonus for this performance objective.

(6)These four individual goals are related to the Free People Brand and include (i) launching a specific line under the Free People Brand and achieving a specific annual sales goal for that new line; (ii) launching another specific line under the Free People Brand and achieving a specific annual sales goal for that new line; (iii) successfully launching a website relating to the Free People Brand; and (iv) achieving an international sales goal for the Free People Brand. For the performance objective listed in this row, amounts payable to Ms. Hayne are dependent on actual Free People Brand net sales and profit and individual goals. Due to the fact that actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan target by less than 5%, the performance objective for the “stretch” goal was not met, but the performance objective for the “budget” goal was met. Therefore, Ms. Hayne was eligible to receive half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective. With respect to individual goals, she achieved goals (i), (ii) and (iii). As a result, she received a payment equal to 7.5% of her maximum bonus potential. The Compensation Committee believed Ms. Hayne’s individual goals were very challenging and achievable only through outstanding performance.

Glen Bodzy – Secretary and General Counsel

Anthropologie StoresBonus Criteria

 

Percent of Total Bonus
Potential

LOCATIONCompany meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage Target(1)

  20 

LOCATIONCompany meets Sales Plan Target and Profit Plan Target(2)

  LOCATION30 LOCATION

AlabamaIndividual Goals

Birmingham

Arizona

Scottsdale

Fashion Square

Kierland Commons

Tucson

California

Berkeley

Beverly Hills

Carlsbad

Carmel

Chula Vista

Corona

Corte Madera

Fresno

Irvine

Los Angeles

Newport Beach

Pasadena

Palo Alto

Rancho Cucamonga

San Francisco

San José

Santa Barbara

Santa Monica

Simi Valley

Thousand Oaks

Torrance

Colorado

Denver

Cherry Creek

Lone Tree

Connecticut

Westport

Greenwich

South Windsor

Florida

Coral Gables

Jacksonville

Miami Beach

Naples

Orlando

Palm Beach Gardens

Tampa

West Palm Beach

Georgia

Atlanta

Dunwoody

Illinois

Chicago

State St.

Southport Ave.

Geneva

Highland Park

Oak Brook

Schaumburg

Maryland

Rockville

Towson

Massachusetts

Boston

Chestnut Hill

Michigan

Birmingham

Troy

Minnesota

Maple Grove

Minneapolis

Missouri
Kansas City
St. Louis

Nevada
Henderson
Las Vegas

New Jersey
Edgewater
Princeton
Short Hills
Woodcliff Lake

New York
Garden City
Greenvale
New York
Union Square
SoHo
Rockefeller Center
White Plains

North Carolina
Charlotte
Northlake Mall
SouthPark Mall

Ohio
Cincinnati
Columbus
Woodmere(3)

  50 
Oregon100 
Portland
Tigard

Pennsylvania
Glen Mills
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Wayne

Texas
Austin
Dallas
Highland Park Village
NorthPark Center
Houston
Plano
San Antonio
Southlake
Spring

Utah
Salt Lake City

Virginia
McLean
Richmond

Washington
Seattle
Fifth Ave.
University Village

Washington D.C.
Georgetown

Free People Stores

 

(1)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales increased by more than 20% and actual profit increased by more than 25%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion exceeded the Sales Plan Target, but actual profit of approximately $309.8 million did not meet the Profit Plan Target. Accordingly, this performance objective was not met.
(3)

LOCATION

LOCATION

LOCATION

New Jersey

Paramus

Short Hills

New York

Garden City

Pennsylvania

Ardmore

KingThese three individual goals include (i) opening at least 45 stores in fiscal year 2009; (ii) opening a specific number of Prussia

Massachusetts

Boston

Virginia
Arlington
McLeanthose stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009; and (iii) entering fiscal year 2010 with a targeted number of signed leases. Mr. Bodzy was able to attain all of these individual goals. The Compensation Committee considered the target for maximum fourth quarter store openings and overall lease signings to be very challenging and achievable only through superior performance.

In additionThe Company did not modify any performance targets during Fiscal 2009 to reflect changes in the stores listed above, Free People operates wholesalefinancial budgets or goals upon which the performance targets and awards were based. If the Company were to change such financial budgets in the future, however, the Compensation Committee would have discretion to adjust bonus awards accordingly where it believes it is warranted in light of the objectives of the compensation program.

The Compensation Committee is currently in the process of determining performance targets and awards for Fiscal 2010 for the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and other executive officers.

The Compensation Committee takes historical sales and showroom facilitiesoperating profit performance and the current business environment into account in New York City, Los Angeles and Chicagothe development of the performance targets upon which performance bonuses are leased through 2014, 2007 and 2008, respectively.based.

Item 3. Legal ProceedingsEquity-Based Incentives

We are party to various legal proceedings arising from normal business activities. ManagementThe Compensation Committee believes that stock ownership by management and equity-based performance compensation arrangements are useful tools to align the ultimate resolutioninterests of these mattersmanagement with those of the Company’s shareholders. Where executives are shareholders themselves, the executives will realize a direct benefit by achieving the objective of maximizing shareholder value. In addition, as shareholders, executives would stand to benefit from successful growth of the Company’s brands to the extent that this would increase the value of their shareholdings. Accordingly, the Company’s executives are eligible to receive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and/or restricted stock units and performance stock units under the Company’s stock incentive plans, which have all been approved by the Company’s shareholders. The Company has in place three stock option plans, including the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Plans”).

Stock Options

The committee believes that including stock options in the compensation program serves the Company’s longer-term goals. Whereas base salary and performance bonuses compensate for achievement of shorter-term goals, it is anticipated that stock options motivate the executive to focus on the Company’s long-term success because the value of the options generally cannot be realized for several years. To date, the committee has granted only time-based stock options.

The exercise price of stock options is equal to or greater than Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Shares on the date of the grant, as defined in the Plans. Awards granted pursuant to the Plans may be subject to performance-based vesting conditions; although to date, all stock options have been time-based.

The Compensation Committee determines whether to grant stock options and the size of the grant to each executive officer based upon its subjective assessment. The committee evaluates the executive officer’s performance after taking into consideration prior years’ grants, the organizational impact of the executive officer and the need to respond to competitive conditions in order retain executive officers and attract new candidates. The Committee did not grant any stock options to named executive officers in fiscal year 2009.

The anti-dilution provisions of the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan were amended on November 14, 2006 by the Board of Directors for the purpose of removing any ambiguity regarding the mandatory nature of those anti-dilution provisions, and to clarify that the Compensation Committee has discretion only with respect to the manner of the adjustment to ensure that equitable and proportionate adjustments are made.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock awards are one of several equity-based incentives available to the committee under the Plans. The Compensation Committee has not made restricted stock awards to named executive officers except for a one-time grant in fiscal year 2005, however, the committee believes that restricted stock awards generally share the same beneficial characteristics of stock options and fit into the Company’s overall compensation philosophy in the same manner.

Performance Stock Units

Performance stock unit awards are another one of several equity-based incentives available to the Compensation Committee under the Plans. Fiscal year 2009 is the first year that the committee has elected to award performance stock units.

On April 28, 2008, the Compensation Committee made two performance stock unit awards to the Chief Executive Officer. Performance stock units are convertible on a one-for-one basis into Common Shares when vested. Vesting is both time-based and performance based; the awards will not vest until the date specified in the award agreement and are forfeited entirely if the established performance criteria are not achieved. The committee considers the awards granted to be an integral component of the Chief Executive Officer’s overall compensation.

The first award entitles the Chief Executive Officer to receive Common Shares at the end of fiscal year 2010, provided that (i) the average of the Company’s Operating Profit (defined as income from operations divided by net sales, excluding certain

types of acquisitions, as these terms as used in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income) in fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010 meets or exceeds the established target and (ii) the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plans) of the Company’s Common Shares at the end of fiscal 2010 meets or exceeds the established threshold. The second award entitles the executive to receive Common Shares at the end of fiscal year 2011, provided that (i) the average of the Company’s Operating Profit in fiscal years 2009 through 2011 meets or exceeds the established target and (ii) the Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Shares at the end of fiscal 2011 meets or exceeds the established threshold. All performance stock units are forfeited if the performance criteria are not met or in the event of the executive’s Termination of Service (as defined in the Plans) prior to the vesting date. At the time of the award, the Compensation Committee expected that the performance criteria would be challenging and achievable only through superior performance, however, if current economic conditions persist, they may have a material adverse effect on ourhis ability to achieve these performance objectives.

The Compensation Committee believes that the performance stock units awarded in fiscal year 2009 promote the overall profitability of the Company and its shareholders by linking the financial position, resultsinterests of operationsthe executive to the achievement of long term growth in shareholder value. Furthermore, these awards are intended to provide the executive with incentive to continue his employment with the Company. In establishing the criteria and vesting periods for these awards, the Compensation Committee selected average Operating Profit of the Company and Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Shares. The committee believes these criteria support its compensation objective of creating long-term incentives (by providing for delayed vesting of the performance stock unit until goals spanning a two or cash flows.three periods are met) and tying those incentives directly to shareholder value (by basing the criteria on future Operating Profit and share price).

Under each award, the executive is entitled to receive 30,184 Common Shares (valued on the award date at approximately $1 million) upon satisfaction of the applicable goals. The number of shares issuable under each award will be reduced to the extent that the Fair Market Value of the shares on the date of issuance has a value exceeding $1.3 million.

Item 4. Submission of MattersTiming

The Company generally considers once-a-year grants to a Votebroad group of Security Holdersexecutives and managers, including named executive officers, typically around the time of its Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and at other times for business purposes related to employee promotions, or retention, or new hires. The Company, as mentioned, made two performance stock unit awards to the Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 2009. The Company makes grants which are effective on or after the date when the Stock Option Plan Administrator, the Compensation Committee, or, for grants that relate to 40,000 or fewer shares, the Chairman approves the grant. The Company does not time grants with respect to the release of positive or negative material non-public information.

Potential Payments Upon Changes in Control; Certain Corporate Transactions

No matters were submittedAll of the Plans provide that in the event of a “change in control” of the Company, all remaining unvested options and restricted stock awards will immediately vest and become exercisable, as applicable. “Change in control” is defined to a voteinclude an event in which any person or group acquires majority beneficial ownership of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, throughCompany, other than Richard A. Hayne or benefit plans sponsored by either the solicitation of proxiesCompany or otherwise.

PART II

Item  5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “URBN.”its subsidiaries. The following table sets forth,basis for the periods indicated below,change in control provisions is that they are consistent with previous Company plans, customary in industry practice and competitive in the reported high and low closing sale prices for our common shares as reportedmarketplace. Assuming a change in control of the Company occurred on January 31, 2009, the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Market Information

   High (1)  Low (1)

Fiscal 2007

    

Quarter ended April 30, 2006

  $28.92  $22.00

Quarter ended July 31, 2006

  $22.93  $14.42

Quarter ended October 31, 2006

  $19.64  $14.01

Quarter ended January 31, 2007

  $25.89  $17.19

Fiscal 2006

    

Quarter ended April 30, 2005

  $24.72  $20.32

Quarter ended July 31, 2005

  $31.48  $21.94

Quarter ended October 31, 2005

  $31.77  $24.90

Quarter ended January 31, 2006

  $33.77  $23.87

(1)The prices for the quarters ended April 30, 2005, July 31, 2005, and October 31, 2005 have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one split of our common shares that was effective September 23, 2005.

HoldersChief Executive Officer, Glen T. Senk, would have received full vesting of Record

On March 23, 2007 there were 103 holders of record of our common shares.

Dividend Policy

Our current credit facility prohibits the payment of cash dividends on our common shares. We have not paid any cash dividends since our initial public offering andrestricted stock units in an amount equal to $6,232,000. Performance stock units under Mr. Senk’s two performance stock unit awards do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common sharesvest automatically upon a change in control.

In the event of certain corporate transactions (such as a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization, or liquidation), the Compensation Committee has discretion to terminate all or a portion of outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, effective as of the closing of the corporate transaction, if it determines that such termination is in the foreseeable future.

Stock Performance

The following tables and graph compare the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares with the cumulative total return on the Standard and Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index and the Standard and Poor’s 500 Apparel Retail Index for the period beginning February 1, 2002 and ending January 31, 2007, assuming the reinvestment of any dividends and assuming an initial investment of $100 in each. The comparisons in this table are required by the SEC and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of the common shares or the referenced indices.

   

ANNUAL RETURN PERCENTAGE

Years Ended

 

Company / Index

  Jan-03  Jan-04  Jan-05  Jan-06  Jan-07 

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

  (21.65) 295.41  107.80  29.83  (10.66)

S&P 500 Index

  (23.02) 34.57  6.23  10.38  14.51 

S&P 500 Apparel Retail

  0.92  31.54  21.06  (5.20) 15.06 

   

Base

Period
Jan-02

  

INDEXED RETURNS

Years Ended

Company / Index

    Jan-03  Jan-04  Jan-05  Jan-06  Jan-07

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

  $100  $78.35  $309.79  $643.76  $835.81  $746.75

S&P 500 Index

   100   76.98   103.60   110.05   121.47   139.10

S&P 500 Apparel Retail

   100   100.92   132.75   160.71   152.35   175.29

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows the status of option grants under the Plan as of January 31, 2007:

   EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
   Number of
Securities to
be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
  Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
  No. of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plan (Excluding Securities
Referenced in Column (A))

Plan Category

  (A)  (B)  (C)

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders:

     

Options

  13,355,675(1) $15.61  1,642,350

Equity Compensation Plans not Approved by Security Holders:

  —     —    —  
          

Total

  13,355,675  $15.61  1,642,350
          

(1)Amounts are subject to adjustment to reflect any stock dividend, stock split, share consideration or similar change in our capitalization.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected consolidated income statement and balance sheet data for the periods indicated. The selected consolidated income statement and balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal years presented below is derived from the consolidated financial statementsbest interests of the Company. If the committee decides to terminate, the holder will have the right to exercise outstanding options and stock appreciation rights on at least seven days’ notice. The basis for selecting these corporate transactions as a triggering event for potential termination by the Compensation Committee is that it is customary in industry practice.

Additional Types of Compensation

In addition to the three main elements, the Company provides additional compensation to its executive officers in the form of: (i) a 401(k) matching contribution which is available to all employees who have completed six months of service, which is $0.25 on every $1.00 of employee deferral up to 6% of salary match, with a vesting schedule of 20% a year for five years, and with the deferral limited by applicable law; (ii) a Christmas bonus, capped at $5,000; and (iii) employee awards made to all staff with fixed dollar amounts for terms of service, in five-year service increments, ranging from $1,000 for 10 years of service to $15,000 for 30 years of service.

Benchmarking

The Compensation Committee does not engage in formal benchmarking when setting compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, although the committee has in the past and would expect in the future to consider information regarding compensation of executive officers of other specialty apparel retailers in developing the compensation plan.

The Compensation Committee takes the Company’s own historical data presented below should be readinto consideration to ensure that compensation increases are consistent with the growth in conjunctionresponsibility and operating profit of its executives. Each year the committee reviews a summary of all of the Company’s named executive officer and key management personnel compensation for the previous fiscal year as well as prior fiscal years. All historical data is viewed with Item 7: Management’s Discussionthe operating results and Analysisresponsibilities of Financial Conditionmanagement personnel and Resultsspecific performance.

Compensation Committee Discretion

The factors related to increasing the compensation and potential compensation from bonuses of Operationsnamed executive officers from year-to-year takes into account increased sales and profitability, performance and measurably increased responsibilities, with a focus on both performance and the consolidated financial statementsleveraging of selling, general and administrative expenses. Historically, the Company has not decreased base salaries or the bonus potential of named executive officers. This is because its history of growth has led to larger responsibilities for its named executive officers and because as a matter of philosophy, it does not generally reduce these compensation elements for existing employees. As more fully described above, however, at the Chairman’s request, the Compensation Committee set the Chairman’s base salary at $1.00 in fiscal year 2009 and that salary remains in effect for fiscal year 2010.

As stated above, the Compensation Committee has discretion in the granting of Performance Bonus Awards and can grant such awards to named executive officers, at its discretion, even if specified performance goals are not achieved. The requirements for Performance Bonus Awards were not waived in Fiscal 2009, but could be waived in the future to reward specific performance achievements in an instance where the actual criteria for a performance bonus were not met or for purposes of retention.

Pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has discretion to accelerate the date on which options or stock appreciation rights may be exercised, and may accelerate the date of termination of the restrictions applicable to restricted stock and restrict stock units if it determines that to do either would be in the best interests of the Company and the related notes thereto, which appear elsewhereplan participants.

The Company at present has no employment agreements or contracts with its named executive officers and has no policies for post termination compensation arrangements. In the future, however, the Company may, in this report.

  Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
  2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
  (in thousands, except share amounts and per share data)

Income Statement Data:

     

Net sales

 $1,224,717 $1,092,107 $827,750 $548,361 $422,754

Gross profit

  451,921  448,606  338,750  213,473  150,791

Income from operations

  163,989  207,699  148,366  80,706  45,399

Net income

  116,206  130,796  90,489  48,376  27,413

Net income per common share—basic

 $0.71 $0.80 $0.56 $0.31 $0.18

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

  164,679,786  163,717,726  161,419,898  157,069,852  151,105,824

Net income per common share—diluted

 $0.69 $0.77 $0.54 $0.30 $0.18

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

  168,652,005  169,936,041  167,303,450  161,662,276  155,107,616

Balance Sheet Data:

     

Working capital

 $231,087 $251,675 $189,597 $118,073 $101,512

Total assets

  899,251  769,205  556,684  384,502  296,303

Total liabilities

  223,968  208,325  154,440  94,372  71,918

Capital lease obligations

  —    —    60  271  471

Total shareholders’ equity

 $675,283 $560,880 $402,244 $290,130 $224,385

Item 7. Management’s Discussionits sole discretion, decide to provide some form of severance in the event that a named executive officer’s employment ceases. No named executive officers separated from the Company in Fiscal 2009 and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We operate two business segments, a lifestyle merchandising retailing segment and a wholesale apparel segment. Our retailing segment consists of our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People brands, whose merchandise is sold directly to our customers through our stores, catalogs, call centers and web sites. Our wholesale apparel segment consists of our Free People Wholesale division that designs, develops and markets young women’s contemporary casual apparel.

A store is included in comparable store net sales data, as presented in this discussion, if it has been open at least one full fiscal year prior to fiscal 2007, unless it was materially expanded or remodeled within that year or was not otherwise operating at its full capacity within that year. Sales from stores that do not fall within the definition of a comparable store are considered non-comparable. Furthermore, non-store sales,no such as catalog and internet sales, are also considered non-comparable.

Although we have no precise empirical data as it relates to customer traffic or customer conversion rates in our stores, we believe that, based only on our observations, changes in transaction volume, as discussed in our results of operations, correlate to changes in customer traffic. We believe this may be caused by a combination of response to our brands’ fashion offerings, our web advertising, additional circulation of our catalogs and an overall growth in brand recognition as we expand our store base, including expansion into enclosed malls and specialty retail centers.

Our fiscal year ends on January 31. All references in this discussion to our fiscal years refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, our fiscal 2007 ended on January 31, 2007. The comparable store net sales data presented in this discussion is calculated based on the net sales of all stores open at least 12 full months at the beginning of the period for which such data is presented.

Our goal is to increase net sales by at least 20% per year through a combination of opening new stores, growing comparable store sales and continuing the growth of our direct-to-consumer and wholesale operations.payments were made.

Retail StoresTax and Accounting Considerations

As of January 31, 2007, we operated 106 Urban Outfitters stores of which 94 are located inHistorically, the United States, three are located in Canada and nine are located in Europe. During fiscal 2007, we opened 16 new Urban Outfitters stores, 14 of which are located within the United States and two of which are located in Europe. Urban Outfitters targets young adults aged 18 to 30 through a unique merchandise mix and compelling store environment. Our product offering includes women’s and men’s fashion apparel, footwear and accessories, as well as an eclectic mix of apartment wares and gifts. We plan to open additional stores over the next several years, some of which may be outside the United States. Urban’s North American and European store sales accounted for approximately 38.9% and 5.8% of consolidated net sales, respectively, for fiscal 2007.

We operated 93 Anthropologie stores as of January 31, 2007, all of which are located in the United States. During fiscal 2007 we opened 14 new Anthropologie stores. Anthropologie tailors its merchandise to sophisticated and contemporary women aged 30 to 45. Our product assortment

includes women’s casual apparel and accessories, home furnishings and a diverse array of gifts and decorative items. We plan to open additional stores over the next several years. Anthropologie’s store sales accounted for approximately 35.9% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

We operated eight Free People stores as of January 31, 2007, all of which are located in the United States. During fiscal 2007 we opened two new Free People stores. Free People primarily offers private label branded merchandise targeted to young contemporary women aged 25 to 30. Free People provides a unique merchandise mix of casual women’s apparel, accessories and gifts. We plan to open additional stores over the next several fiscal years. Free People’s retail sales accounted for less than 1% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

For all brands combined, we plan to open at least 38 stores during fiscal 2008, including six to ten new Free People stores. The remaining new stores will be divided approximately evenly between Urban Outfitters and Anthropologie. We plan to grow our store base by approximately 20% per year.

Direct-to-consumer

In March 1998, Anthropologie introduced a direct-to-consumer catalog offering selected merchandise, most of which is also available in our Anthropologie stores. During fiscal 2007, we circulated approximately 21.8 million catalogs and believe that this catalogCompany has been instrumental in helping to build the Anthropologie brand identity with our target customers. We plan to modestly expand circulation to approximately 21.9 million catalogs during fiscal 2008 and intend to increase the level of catalog circulation over the next few years.

Anthropologie operates a web site that accepts orders directly from consumers. The web site,www.anthropologie.com, debuted in December 1998. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar array of apparel, accessories, household and gift merchandise as found in the stores. As with our catalog, we believebelieved that the web site increases Anthropologie’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the strength of Anthropologie’s store operations.

In March 2003, Urban Outfitters introduced a direct-to-consumer catalog offering selected merchandise, much of which is also available in our Urban Outfitters stores. During fiscal 2007, we circulated approximately 11.4 million Urban Outfitters catalogs. We believe this catalog has expanded our distribution channels and increased brand awareness. We plan to expand circulation to approximately 12.0 million in fiscal 2008 and intend to increase the level of catalog circulation over the next few years.

Urban Outfitters also operates a web site that accepts orders directly from consumers. The web site,www.urbanoutfitters.com, was launched in May 2000. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in the stores. As with the Urban Outfitters catalog, we believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with its target customers, as well as helps to support the strength of Urban Outfitters store operations.

In August 2006, Urban Outfitters launched a web site targeting our European customers. The web site,www.urbanoutfitters.co.uk, captures the spirit of our European stores by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in our stores. Fulfillment is provided from a third-party distribution

center located in the United Kingdom. We believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with our European customers as well as helps to support our Urban Outfitters European store operations.

We successfully launched the Free People web site,www.freepeople.com,in September 2004. The web site offers consumers the entire Free People product assortment found at Free People retail stores as well as all of the Free People wholesale offerings. In October 2005, Free People introduced a direct-to-consumer catalog offering selected merchandise much of which is also available in our Free People stores. In fiscal 2007, we circulated approximately 3.3 million Free People catalogs which expanded our distribution channels and increased brand awareness. We plan to expand circulation to approximately 4.3 million catalogs in fiscal 2008 and intend to increase the level of catalog circulation over the next few years.

Direct-to-consumer sales were approximately 12.6% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

Wholesale

The Free People wholesale division designs, develops and markets young women’s contemporary casual apparel. Free People’s range of tops, bottoms, sweaters and dresses are sold worldwide through approximately 1,500 better department and specialty stores, including Bloomingdale’s, Lord & Taylor, Parisian, Nordstrom, Urban Outfitters and our own Free People stores. Free People wholesale sales accounted for approximately 6.0% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period.

Our senior management has reviewed the critical accounting policies and estimates with our audit committee. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. If actual results were to differ significantly from estimates made, the reported results could be materially affected. We are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would cause our actual results to be materially different from our estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale for retail store sales or when merchandise is shipped to customers for wholesale and direct-to-consumer sales, net of estimated customer returns. Payment for merchandise at our stores and through our direct-to-consumer business is by cash, check, credit card, debit card or gift card. Therefore, our need to collect outstanding accounts receivable for our retail and

direct-to-consumer business is negligible and mainly results from returned checks or unauthorized credit card charges. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for our wholesale business accounts receivable which management reviews on a regular basis and believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses and billing adjustments. Deposits for custom orders are recorded as a liability and recognized as a sale upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. These custom orders, typically for upholstered furniture, have not been material. Gift card sales to customers are initially recorded as liabilities and recognized as sales upon redemption.

Sales Return Reserve

We record a reserve for estimated product returns where the sale has occurred during the period reported, but the return is likely to occur subsequent to the period reported and may otherwise be considered in-transit. The reserve for estimated in-transit product returns is based on our most recent historical return trends. If the actual return rate or experience is materially different than our estimate, the reserve will be adjusted in the future. As of January 31, 2007 and 2006, reserves for estimated sales returns in-transit totaled $8.9 million and $6.4 million, representing 4.0% and 3.1% of total liabilities, respectively.

Inventories

We value our inventories, which consist primarily of general consumer merchandise held for sale, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method and includes the cost of merchandise and freight. A periodic review of inventory quantities on hand is performed in order to determine if inventory is properly stated at the lower of cost or market. Factors related to current inventories, such as future consumer demand and fashion trends, current aging, current and anticipated retail markdowns or wholesale discounts, and class or type of inventory, are analyzed to determine estimated net realizable values. Criteria we use to quantify aging trends includes factors such as average selling cycle and seasonality of merchandise, the historical rate at which merchandise has sold below cost during the average selling cycle, and inventory currently priced below its original cost. A provision is recorded to reduce the cost of inventories to its estimated net realizable value, if required. Net inventories as of January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2006 totaled $154.4 million and $140.4 million, representing 17.2% and 18.2% of total assets, respectively. Any significant unanticipated changes in the risk factors noted within this report could have a significant impact on the value of our inventories and our reported operating results.

Adjustments to reserves related to the net realizable value of our inventories are primarily based on the market value of our physical inventory at January 31, 2007 and recent historical trends. Our estimates generally have been accurate and our reserve methods have been applied on a consistent basis. We expect the amount of our reserves to increase over time as we expand our store base and accordingly, related inventories.

Long-Lived Assets

Our long-lived assets consist principally of store leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures and buildings, and are included in the “Property and equipment, net” line item in our consolidated balance sheets included in this report. Store leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the applicable store lease term, including

lease renewals which are reasonably assured, or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvements. The typical initial lease term for our stores is ten years. Buildings are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over 39 years. Furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful life, which is typically five years. Net property and equipment as of January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2006 totaled $445.7 million and $299.3 million, respectively, representing 49.6% and 38.9% of total assets, respectively.

In assessing potential impairment of our store related assets, we periodically evaluate historical and forecasted operating results and cash flows on a store-by-store basis. Newly opened stores may take time to generate positive operating and cash flow results. Factors such as store type (e.g., mall versus free-standing), store location (e.g., urban area versus college campus or suburb), current marketplace awareness of our brands, local customer demographic data and current fashion trends are all considered in determining the time frame required for a store to achieve positive financial results, which, in general, is assumed to be measurable within three years from the date a store location has opened. If economic conditions are substantially different from our expectations, the carrying value of certain of our long-lived assets may become impaired. For fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, write-downs of long-lived assets were not material.

We have only closed three store locations in our history, which in all cases, were eventually re-located, and took place at the expiration of the lease and renewal terms. We have not historically encountered material early retirement charges related to our long-lived assets. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts with any resulting gain or loss included in net income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expense as incurred. Major renovations or improvements that extend the service lives of our assets are capitalized over the extension period or life of the improvement, whichever is less. We did not close any store locations in fiscal 2007.

As of the date of this report, all of our stores opened in excess of three years are expected to generate positive annual cash flow before allocation of corporate overhead.

Accounting for Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax obligations together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of certain items for tax and accounting purposes, such as depreciationtreatments of property and equipment and valuationstock options were a favorable factor in its granting of inventories. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. Actual results could differ from this assessment if adequate taxable income is not generated in future periods. Deferred tax assets asthem. The advent of January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2006 totaled $28.5 million and $23.9 million, respectively, representing 3.2% and 3.1% of total assets, respectively. To the extent we believe that recovery of an asset is at risk, we establish valuation allowances. To the extent we establish valuation allowances or increase the allowances in a period, we include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of income.

We reduced valuation allowances to $0.2 million as of January 31, 2007 from $3.1 million as of January 31, 2006. This reduction occurred based on evidence of our ability to generate sufficient future

taxable income in certain foreign jurisdictions. Existing valuation allowances are due to remaining uncertainties related to our ability to utilize other net operating loss carryforwards of certain foreign subsidiaries. In the future, if enough evidence of our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in these foreign jurisdictions becomes apparent, we would be required to reduce our valuation allowances, resulting in a reduction in income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the likelihood that we will realize the deferred tax assets and adjusts the valuation allowances, if appropriate.

Accounting for Contingencies

From time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. We account for contingencies such as these in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” SFAS No. 5 requires us to record an estimated loss contingency when information available prior to issuance of our consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Accounting for contingencies arising from contractual or legal proceedings requires management to use its best judgment when estimating an accrual related to such contingencies. As additional information becomes known, our accrual for a loss contingency could fluctuate, thereby creating variability in our results of operations from period to period. Likewise, an actual loss arising from a loss contingency which significantly exceeds the amount accrued in our consolidated financial statements could have a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period in which such actual loss becomes known.

Results of Operations

As a Percentage of Net Sales

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of our net sales represented by certain income statement dataFAS 123(R) and the change in accounting treatment accorded the granting of stock options has changed that assessment.

The applicability of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code may affect the tax deductibility of certain income statement data from periodportions of named executive officers’ compensation. Wherever possible, the Company structures compensation for its executive officers in a way that preserves tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

The Company does not usually consider the tax consequences to period. This table shouldnamed executive officers of cash compensation or of equity based compensation, though it considers the tax treatment to the Company for non-qualified options and the non-qualifying disposition of qualified options to be read in conjunctionfavorable.

Security Ownership Guidelines

The Company has no policy that requires or that sets guidelines for the ownership of Common Shares of the Company; nor does it have any policy on the hedging of economic risk of such ownership or of vested stock options, other than requiring full compliance with the discussion that follows:all applicable laws.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

   

Fiscal Year Ended

January 31,

 
   2007  2006  2005 

Net sales

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of sales, including certain buying, distribution and occupancy costs

  63.1  58.9  59.1 
          

Gross profit

  36.9  41.1  40.9 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  23.5  22.1  23.0 
          

Income from operations

  13.4  19.0  17.9 

Interest income

  0.5  0.5  0.3 

Other income

  —    —    —   

Other expenses

  —    (0.1) (0.1)
          

Income before income taxes

  13.9  19.4  18.1 

Income tax expense

  4.4  7.5  7.2 
          

Net income

  9.5% 11.9% 10.9%
          

Period over Period Change:

    

Net sales

  12.1% 31.9% 51.0%

Gross profit

  0.7% 32.4% 58.7%

Income from operations

  (21.0)% 40.0% 83.8%

Net income

  (11.2)% 44.5% 87.1%

Name and Principal Position

 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards(1)
($)
  Option
Awards(2)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
  Total
($)

Glen T. Senk,

 2009 1,003,846 5,000 1,156,359(4) —   1,000,000 —   4,534(5) 3,166,580

Chief Executive Officer

 2008 750,000 250,000 1,153,200  —   300,000 —   7,683  2,460,883

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 2007 577,218 5,000 1,153,200  —   50,000 —   3,438  1,788,856

(Principal Executive Officer)

         

John E. Kyees,

 2009 439,615 5,000 —    —   184,800 —   4,150(6) 633,565

Chief Financial Officer

 2008 424,500 5,000 —    87,408 50,000 —   4,461  571,369

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 2007 411,585 5,000 —    159,502 —   —   4,175  580,262

(Principal Financial Officer)

         

Tedford A. Marlow,

 2009 469,731 5,000 —    —   244,438 —   278(7) 719,447

President,

 2008 453,904 5,000 —    —   50,000 —   268  509,172

Urban Outfitters Brand

 2007 436,676 5,000 —    —   50,000 —   205  491,881

Margaret Hayne,

 2009 337,500 5,000 —    —   115,500 —   4,011(8) 462,011

President,

         

Free People Brand

         

Glen A. Bodzy,

 2009 299,769 5,000 —    —   105,000 —   4,068(9) 413,837

Secretary and General Counsel

 2008 289,692 6,314 —    40,180 35,000 —   4,451  375,637

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 2007 281,085 5,000 —    78,869 30,000 —   3,329  398,283

(1)Stock award represents 400,000 shares of restricted Common Shares with a grant date weighted average fair value of $14.42 per share, resulting in a grant date fair value of $5,768,000, which has a term of five years .
(2)Compensation expense recorded for option awards are calculated under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment.” The estimated fair value of the options for Fiscal 2009 were calculated using the Lattice Binomial Option Pricing Model and all other years presented were calculated using the Black Sholes option pricing Model. For a further description of the assumptions and accounting for stock options, see footnote 9 in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009.
(3)Includes matching cash contributions in Fiscal 2009 by the Company under the Urban Outfitters 401(k) Savings Plan of $4,370 for Mr. Senk, $3,723 for Mr. Kyees, $3,863 for Ms. Hayne and $3,790 for Mr. Bodzy.
(4)In accordance with FAS123(R), the Company did not record compensation expense during Fiscal 2009 with respect to two performance stock unit awards granted on April 28, 2008. These performance stock unit awards vest only upon satisfaction of certain performance conditions. The awards were valued using a Lattice Binomial model. In accordance with FAS123(R), the compensation expense amount of $442,102 was not recognized for financial statement reporting purposes because vesting was deemed highly improbable. For a further description of the assumptions and accounting for performance stock units, see footnote 9 in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009. Whether Mr. Senk will receive any shares in respect of the performance stock units is contingent on whether the Company achieves certain performance objectives. For a description of these performance objectives, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Related Incentives—Performance Stock Units.
(5)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Senk in the amount of $164.
(6)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Kyees in the amount of $427.
(7)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Marlow in the amount of $278.
(8)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Ms. Hayne in the amount of $148.
(9)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Bodzy in the amount of $278.

Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

Net sales in fiscal 2007 increased by 12.1% to $1.22 billion, from $1.09 billion in the prior fiscal year. The $133 million increase was primarily attributable to a $112 million or 10.7% increase, in retail segment sales. Free People wholesale sales contributed $21 million or 15.8%, excluding sales to our retail segment, to the increase. The growth in our retail segment sales during fiscal 2007 was driven by a $139 million increase in non-comparable and new store net sales and an increase in direct-to-consumer sales of $23 million or 17.7% that more than offset a $50 million or 6.2% decline in comparable store sales. The decrease in comparable store net sales was comprised of 5.0% and 7.2% declines at Anthropologie and Urban Outfitters, respectively. Free People comparable store sales increased 11.5% for fiscal year 2007.

      Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of

Shares
of Stock

or Units
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Grant Date
Fair

Value of
Stock
and Option
Awards

($)
 

Name

  Grant
Date
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
        

Glen T. Senk

  —    2,000,000  2,000,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    
  4/28/2008      60,368  60,368  —    —    —    2,000,000(2) 

John E. Kyees

  —    264,000  264,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

Tedford A. Marlow

  —    282,000  564,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

Margaret Hayne

  —    210,000  420,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

Glen A. Bodzy

  —    150,000  150,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

(1)The threshold column has been omitted because the Company’s bonus plan for Fiscal 2009 did not provide for the threshold concept. The target and the maximum potential award for achieving all of the initial bonus goals are the same, except for Tedford A. Marlow and Margaret Hayne. The amounts shown in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table (on page 23) reflect that some goals were achieved and some were not met. For a further discussion on how the Compensation Committee determines the criteria for the Company’s executive officers’ performance bonuses, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Performance Bonuses” above. For a description of each named executive officer’s performance objectives, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Performance Bonuses—Performance Targets” above.
(2)Based on the closing price on April 28, 2008, the date the performance stock unit awards were made. Whether Mr. Senk will receive any shares in respect of the performance stock units is contingent on whether the Company achieves certain performance objectives. For a description of these performance objectives, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Related Incentives—Performance Stock Units.”

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2009 FISCAL YEAR-END

   Option Awards  Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  Market
Value
of

Shares
or

Units
of

Stock
That
Have

Not
Vested

($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 

Glen T. Senk

  1,600,000   0  0  14.35  6/20/2014  —    —    —     —    
  100,000(1)  0  0  31.11  11/17/2015  —    —    —     —    
  —     —    —    —    —    —    —    400,000(2)  6,232,000(3) 
               60,368(4)  940,533(5) 

John E. Kyees

  200,000     0  9.22  11/23/2011  —    —    —     —    
  300,000   0  0  14.35  6/20/2014  —    —    —     —    

Tedford A. Marlow

  600,000   0  0  1.47  7/23/2011  —    —    —     —    
  100,000(6)  0  0  31.11  11/17/2015  —    —    —     —    

Margaret Hayne

  —     —    —    —    —    —    —    —     —    

Glen A. Bodzy

  8,000   0  0  3.37  5/18/2009  —    —    —     —    
  48,000   0  0  1.08  8/31/2010  —    —    —     —    
  128,000   0  0  1.43  8/8/2011  —    —    —     —    
  160,000     0  5.91  9/5/2013  —    —    —     —    
  80,000(7)  0  0  31.11  11/17/2015  —    —    —     —    

(1)Options vested in their entirety on January 18, 2006. All Common Shares acquired upon exercise of these options are required to be held by Mr. Senk until November 18, 2010.
(2)Restricted Common Shares vest on June 21, 2009.
(3)Calculated by multiplying our closing market price on January 30, 2009 by the number of restricted Common Shares that have not vested.
(4)If all performance objectives are achieved, 30,184 performance stock units will convert into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis upon vesting on January 31, 2010. If all performance objectives are achieved, 30,184 performance stock units will convert into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis upon vesting on January 31, 2011. If performance objectives under the respective award are not achieved, all performance stock units under that award are forfeited. For a further description of these performance stock unit awards, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Related Incentives—Performance Stock Units.”
(5)Calculated by multiplying our closing market price on January 30, 2009 by the number of performance stock units that have not vested.
(6)Options vested in their entirety on January 18, 2006. All Common Shares acquired upon exercise of these options are required to be held by Mr. Marlow until November 18, 2010.
(7)Options vested in their entirety on January 18, 2006. All Common Shares acquired upon exercise of these options are required to be held by Mr. Bodzy until November 18, 2010.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL 2009

   Option Awards  Stock Awards

Name

  Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
  Value
Realized

on
Exercise
($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
  Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)

Glen T. Senk

  —      —    —  

John E. Kyees

  300,000  4,750,903  —    

Tedford A. Marlow

  300,000  8,610,843  —    —  

Margaret Hayne

  —    —    —    —  

Glen A. Bodzy

  —    —    —    —  

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The increase in net sales attributable to non-comparable and new stores was primarily the result of opening 32 new stores in fiscal 2007 and 33 new stores in fiscal 2006 that were considered non-comparable during fiscal 2007. Comparable store net sales decreases were primarily the result of a decrease in transactions, and a slight decrease in the average unit sales prices resulting from a lower response to the Company’s merchandise offerings as it adjusted to a significant shift in fashion trends. These decreases more than offset a modest increase in the number of units sold per transaction. Thus far during fiscal 2008, total Company comparable store sales are positive. Direct-to-consumer net

sales increased over the prior year primarily due to improved customer response related to the circulation of approximately 5 million additional catalogs, increased traffic to our web sites and improvements in the average order value at all brands. The increase in Free People wholesale sales was driven by a favorable customer response to our fashion offerings.

Gross profit rates in fiscal 2007 decreased to 36.9% of net sales or $452 million from 41.1% of net sales or $449 million in fiscal 2006. These reductions were primarily due to additional markdowns and price adjustments to clear seasonal inventory, a higher rate of fixed store occupancy expense due to comparable store sales decreases and increases to inventory related valuation reserves. Total inventories at January 31, 2007 increased by 10.0% to $154 million from $140 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase primarily related to the acquisition of inventory to stock new retail stores. On a comparable store basis, inventories decreased by 2.9% versus the prior fiscal year. We anticipate making similar inventory investments in connection with new store openings in fiscal 2008.

Selling, general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2007 increased to 23.5% of net sales versus 22.1% of net sales for fiscal 2006. This unfavorable increase was primarily attributable to the de-leveraging of store-level expenses as a resultCompensation Committee of the decreases in comparable store sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2007 increased to $288 million from $241 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase primarily related to the operating expenses of new and non-comparable stores.

Income from operations decreased to 13.4% of net sales or $164 million for fiscal 2007 compared to 19.0% of net sales or $208 million for fiscal 2006.

Our annual effective income tax rate improved to 31.7% of income for fiscal 2007 compared to 38.4% of income for fiscal 2006. This decrease is based upon a number of factors including: certification for work performed on the development of our new offices that qualifies for certain one-time federal tax incentives; the execution of certain related reorganization efforts and the relief of certain valuation allowances related to net operating loss carry-forwards of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. We believe we will receive an additional one-time benefit in fiscal 2008 from our office relocation work and on-going benefits in fiscal 2008 and future years from our tax planning efforts. See Note 7 “Income Taxes” in our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report, for a reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate.

Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005

Net sales in fiscal 2006 increased by 31.9% to $1.09 billion, from $828 million in the prior fiscal year. The $264 million increase was primarily attributable to a $239 million or 29.8% increase, in retail segment sales. Free People wholesale sales contributed $26 million or 9.8%, excluding sales to our retail segment, to the increase. The growth in our retail segment sales during fiscal 2006 was driven by a $134 million increase in non-comparable and new store net sales, a $68 million or 10.9% increase in comparable store sales and an increase in direct-to-consumer sales of $37 million or 39.0%. The increase in comparable store net sales was comprised of a 6.4%, 28.0% and 14.9% increase for Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters, respectively.

The increase in net sales attributable to non-comparable and new stores was primarily the result of opening 33 new stores in fiscal 2006 and 28 new stores in fiscal 2005 that were considered

non-comparable during fiscal 2006. Comparable store net sales increases were primarily the result of an increase in the average sales prices resulting from higher initial margins which more than offset a heavy increase in markdowns during the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. Comparable store transactions improved modestly while units per transaction were down slightly. Direct-to-consumer net sales increased over the prior year primarily due to additional customer response related to the circulation of approximately 5.4 million additional catalogs, increased traffic to the web sites and improvements in the average order value at all brands. The increase in Free People wholesale sales was driven by an increase in customer response to our fashion offerings.

Gross profit in fiscal 2006 increased to 41.1% of net sales or $449 million from 40.9% of net sales or $339 million in fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due to the leveraging of store related occupancy costs, driven by the increase in comparable store sales which more than offset the increase in markdowns. Total inventories at January 31, 2006 increased by 41.8% to $140 million from $99 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase primarily related to the acquisition of inventory to stock new retail stores. On a comparable store basis, inventories increased by 13.1% versus the prior fiscal year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2006 decreased to 22.1% of net sales versus 23.0% of net sales for fiscal 2005. This improvement was primarily attributable to the leveraging of store-level expenses as a result of the increases in the comparable store sales and leveraging of fixed expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2006 increased to $241 million from $190 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase primarily related to the operating expenses of new and non-comparable stores.

Accordingly, income from operations increased to 19.0% of net sales or $208 million for fiscal 2006 compared to 17.9% of net sales or $148 million for fiscal 2005.

Our effective income tax rate decreased to 38.4% of income for fiscal 2006 compared to 39.8% of income for fiscal 2005. This decrease was primarily attributable to a lower effective state income tax rate due to a change in the weight of sales, property and income apportioned to lower tax jurisdictions. See Note 7 “Income Taxes” in our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report, for a reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $222 million as of January 31, 2007 as compared to $257 million as of January 31, 2006 and $219 million as of January 31, 2005. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities during fiscal 2007 occurred primarily as a result of investments in store related property and equipment and the completion of our new offices at the Philadelphia Navy Yard. Navy Yard expenditures approximated $82 million during fiscal 2007. We also repurchased approximately $21 million of our common shares during the year. Cash used in these investing and financing activities offset $187 million of cash provided by operations. During fiscal years 2006 and 2005, cash increases were primarily a result of cash provided by operating activities. Our working capital for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $231 million, $252 million and $190 million, respectively. The changes in working capital primarily relate to the volume of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and inventories relative to inventory-related payables and store-related accruals.

During the last three years, we have mainly satisfied our cash requirements through our cash flow from operations. Our primary uses of cash have been to open new stores and purchase inventories. We have also continued to invest in our direct-to-consumer efforts and in our European subsidiaries. Cash paid for property and equipment, net of tenant improvement allowances included in deferred rent for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $193 million, $111 million and $60 million respectively, and were primarily used to expand and support our store base. During fiscal 2008, we plan to construct and open at least 38 new stores, renovate certain existing stores, increase our catalog circulation by approximately 2 million to approximately 38 million catalogs, and purchase inventory for our stores and direct-to-consumer business at levels appropriate to maintain our planned sales growth. We plan to reduce the level of capital expenditures during fiscal 2008 to approximately $100 million. We believe that our new store, catalog and inventory investments have the ability to generate positive cash flow within a year. Improvements to our home office and distribution facilities were necessary to adequately support our growth. For the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2006 we spent approximately $82 million and $22 million, respectively, on improvements made to our offices at the Navy Yard. Total expenditures for the project as of January 31, 2007, were approximately $104 million at which time the project was complete.

We anticipate opening a distribution center in fiscal 2008 on the west coast of the United States to support our western stores. We expect the facility will be financed through an operating lease and that we will spend $3 to $5 million on equipment and other improvements.

On February 28, 2006, ourCompany’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program. The program authorizes us(collectively, the “Committee”) has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:

Our Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on our Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to repurchase upthe Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our Committee recommended to 8,000,000 common shares from time-to-time, based upon prevailing market conditions. Duringthe Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, we repurchased and subsequently retired 1,220,000 shares at a cost of approximately $21 million.2009 for filing with the SEC.

We anticipate making investments to begin testing a new retail concept during fiscal 2008. We are still inThe foregoing report is provided by the stages of developingfollowing Directors, who constitute the format and market objectivesCompensation Committee:

Scott A. Belair,Chairman of the conceptCompensation Committee

Joel S. Lawson III

Robert H. Strouse

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Belair, Mr. Lawson and have yet to determine or quantify the extent of such an investment. Expenditures may include the costs of strategic research and development, hiring personnel to develop and execute a store format, obtaining leases and related store inventory, property and equipment, acquiring assets or existing businesses, intellectual property and trade secrets or intangible knowledge and any other costs related to developing and executing this new concept.

Accumulated cash and future cash from operations, as well as available credit under our line of credit facility, are expected to fund our commitments and all such expansion-related cash needs at least through fiscal 2010.

On September 30, 2004, we renewed and amended our line of credit facility (the “Line”). The Line is a three-year revolving credit facility with an accordion feature allowing an increase in available credit to $50 million at our discretion, subject to a seven day request period. As of January 31, 2007, the credit limit under the Line was $43 million. The Line contains a sub-limit for borrowings by our European subsidiaries that are guaranteed by us. Cash advances bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.60% based on our achievement of prescribed adjusted debt ratios. The Line subjects us to various restrictive covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios and covenants such as fixed charge coverage and adjusted debt. The covenants also include limitations on our capital expenditures, ability to repurchase shares and the payment of cash dividends. On November 30, 2006 we amended

our line to increase our capital expenditure limit and add additional subsidiaries that are permitted to borrow. As of January 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Line. As of and during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, there were no borrowings under the Line. Outstanding letters of credit and stand-by letters of credit under the Line totaled approximately $32 million as of January 31, 2007. The available credit, including the accordion feature, under the Line was $18 million as of January 31, 2007. We plan to renew the Line during fiscal 2008 and expect the renewal will include the expansionMr. Strouse. No member of the available credit limit under the Line toCompensation Committee is or was during Fiscal 2009 an amount that will satisfy our letter of credit needs through fiscal 2010.

We have entered into agreements that create contractual obligations and commercial commitments. These obligations and commitments will haveemployee, or is or ever has been an impact on future liquidity and the availability of capital resources. Accumulated cash and future cash from operations, as well as available credit under our line of credit facility, are expected to fund such obligations and commitments. The tables noted below present a summary of these obligations and commitments as of January 31, 2007:

Contractual Obligations

      Payments Due by Period (in thousands)

Description

  

Total

Obligations

  

Less Than

One

Year

  

One to

Three

Years

  

Four to

Five

Years

  

More Than

Five

Years

Operating leases (1)

  $719,785  $92,280  $184,606  $152,197  $290,702

Purchase orders

   26,769   26,769   —     —     —  

Construction contracts (2)

   4,922   4,922   —     —     —  
                    

Total contractual obligations

  $751,476  $123,971  $184,606  $152,197  $290,702
                    

(1)Includes store operating leases, which generally provide for payment of direct operating costs in addition to rent. The obligation amounts shown above only reflect our future minimum lease payments as the direct operating costs fluctuate over the term of the lease. Additionally, there are five locations where a percentage of sales are paid in lieu of a fixed minimum rent that are not reflected in the above table. Total rent expense related to these five locations was approximately $861,000 for fiscal 2007. The leases pertaining to two of our Urban Outfitters stores in London at Covent Gardens and Oxford Street only specify our rent obligation for a five year period. The minimum rent obligation is then subject to review every five years. Included in the table above is an estimate of our rent obligation on these properties for the first five years. Amounts noted above include commitments for 27 executed leases for stores not opened as of January 31, 2007.
(2)Pertains to store construction contracts with contractors that are fully liquidated upon the completion of construction, which is typically within 12 months.

Commercial Commitments

Description

  

Total

Amounts

Committed

  

Amount of Commitment Per Period

(in thousands)

    

Less

Than

One

Year

  

One

to

Three

Years

  

Four

to

Five

Years

  

More

Than

Five

Years

Line of credit (1)

  $30,606  $30,606  $  —    $  —    $  —  

Standby letters of credit

   1,735   1,735     —       —       —  
                    

Total commercial commitments

  $32,341  $32,341  $—    $—    $—  
                    

(1)Consists primarily of outstanding letter of credit commitments in connection with inventory purchases.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of and for the three years ended January 31, 2007, except for operating leases entered into in the normal course of business, we were not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Other Matters

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the faceofficer, of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any,Company or its subsidiaries. No executive officer of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 could have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 could have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC staff published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 addresses quantifying the financial statement effects of misstatements, specifically, how the effects of prior year uncorrected errors must be considered in quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. This statement is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) ratified its consensus on Issue No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be

Presented in the Income Statement”. EITF 06-3 addresses what type of government assessments should be included within the scope of EITF 06-3, and how such government assessments should be presented in the income statement. The EITF concluded that the scope of EITF 06-3 includes any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer and may include, but is not limited to, sales, use, value added and some excise taxes. In addition the EITF also concluded that the presentation of taxes, within the scope of EITF 06-3, on either a gross or net basis, is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 22, “Disclosure of Accounting Policies”. In addition, for any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amounts of those taxes in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The EITF observed that because EITF 06-3 requires only the presentation of additional disclosures, an entity would not be required to re-evaluate its existing policies related to taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer. EITF 06-3 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. We will adopt the disclosure requirements of EITF 06-3 effective February 1, 2007, however, since we present revenue on a net basis, no further disclosure under EITF 06-3 will be required.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation was issued to clarify the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The new standard also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 is expected to result in adjustments to our tax contingency reserves and deferred income taxes which could be material, with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of FIN 48 nor measured its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Seasonality and Quarterly Results

The following tables set forth our net sales, gross profit, net income and net income per common share (basic and diluted) for each quarter during the last two fiscal years and the amount of such net sales and net income, respectively,Company served as a percentage of annual net sales and annual net income.

   Fiscal 2007 Quarter Ended 
   

April 30,

2006

  

July 31,

2006

  

Oct. 31,

2006

  

Jan. 31,

2007

 
   (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 

Net sales

  $270,007  $285,559  $308,355  $360,796 

Gross profit

   96,768   104,752   117,948   132,453 

Net income

   20,299   25,662   34,514   35,731 

Net income per common share—basic

   0.12   0.16   0.21   0.22 

Net income per common share—diluted

   0.12   0.15   0.21   0.21 

As a Percentage of Fiscal Year:

     

Net sales

   22%  23%  25%  30%

Net income

   17%  22%  30%  31%
   Fiscal 2006 Quarter Ended 
   

April 30,

2005

  

July 31,

2005

  

Oct. 31,

2005

  

Jan. 31,

2006

 
   (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 

Net sales

  $231,325  $253,392  $288,801  $318,589 

Gross profit

   97,617   104,836   120,251   125,902 

Net income

   27,440   30,601   37,162   35,593 

Net income per common share—basic

   0.17   0.19   0.23   0.22 

Net income per common share—diluted

   0.16   0.18   0.22   0.21 

As a Percentage of Fiscal Year:

     

Net sales

   22%  23%  26%  29%

Net income

   21%  23%  29%  27%

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to the following types of market risks—fluctuations in the purchase price of merchandise, as well as other goods and services; the value of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar; and changes in interest rates. Due to the Company’s inventory turnover rate and its historical ability to pass through the impact of any generalized changes in its cost of goods to its customers through pricing adjustments, commodity and other product risks are not expected to be material. The Company purchases substantially all of its merchandise in U.S. dollars, includingdirector or a portionmember of the goods for its stores located in Canada and Europe.

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Ascompensation committee of January 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities consisted primarilyanother company, one of funds invested in tax-exempt municipal bonds rated AA or better, auction rate securities rated AA or better and money market accounts, which bear interest atwhose executive officers serves as a variable rate. Due to the average maturity and conservative naturemember of the Company’s investment portfolio, we believe a 100 basis point change in interest rates would notBoard or Compensation Committee. Please see “Certain Business Relationships” below with respect to Mr. Belair.

have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. As the interest rates on a material portion of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are variable, a change in interest rates earned on the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities would impact interest income along with cash flows, but would not impact the fair market value of the related underlying instruments.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataPART IV

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Seasonality and Quarterly Results of Operations and from pages F-1 through F-27.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this review, the Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2007.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our system of internal control is designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2007.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007 was audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that is included on page 34 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, that Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the

criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of January 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated March 30, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 30, 2007

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers and directors:

 

NameItem 15.

Age

Position

Richard A. Hayne

59Chairman of the Board of DirectorsExhibits and President

John E. Kyees

60Chief Financial Officer

Glen A. Bodzy

54General Counsel and Secretary

Glen T. Senk

50Director and Executive Vice President; President, Anthropologie, Inc.

Tedford G. Marlow

55President, Urban Brand, Worldwide

Robert Ross

38Controller

Freeman M. Zausner

59Chief Administrative Officer

Scott A. Belair (2)(3)

59Director

Harry S. Cherken, Jr. (1)

57Director

Joel S. Lawson III (2)(3)

59Director

Robert H. Strouse (1)(2)(3)

58DirectorStatement Schedules

(1)Member of the Nominating Committee.
(2)Member of the Audit Committee.
(3)Member of the Compensation Committee.

Mr. Hayne co-founded Urban Outfitters in 1970 and has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and President since its incorporation in 1976.

Mr. Kyees joined Urban Outfitters in November 2003. He is a 31-year veteran in the retail industry with Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) roles at several retailers. Mr. Kyees formerly held the position as CFO and Chief Administrative Officer for bebe stores, Inc., a retail chain headquartered in San Francisco, from March 2002 through November 2003. Prior to joining bebe, Mr. Kyees served as CFO for Skinmarket, a startup teenage cosmetic retailer, from March 2000 through March 2002. Mr. Kyees was also CFO for HC Holdings from December 1997 through March 2000. From May 1997 through December 1997, Mr. Kyees was CFO for Ashley Stewart and from November 1984 through January 1997 Mr. Kyees was CFO for Express, which is a division of The Limited Brands, Inc.

Mr. Bodzy joined Urban Outfitters as its General Counsel in December 1997 and was appointed Secretary in February 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bodzy was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Service Merchandise Company, Inc. where he was responsible for legal affairs, the store development program and various other corporate areas.

Mr. Senk, a director since 2004, has served as President of Anthropologie, Inc. since April 1994. Mr. Senk was named Executive Vice President of Urban Outfitters, Inc. in May 2002, and assumed responsibility for the Company’s Free People division in May 2003. The Board of Directors, at the Chairman’s recommendation, is expected to elect Mr. Senk to a newly created position of Chief Executive Officer at its regularly scheduled Board Meeting on May 22, 2007. If elected, Mr. Senk would oversee each of the three existing brands and the corporate shared services functions. Prior to

joining the Company, Mr. Senk was Senior Vice President and General Merchandise Manager of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Chief Executive of the Habitat International Merchandise and Marketing Group in London, England. Mr. Senk began his retail career at Bloomingdale’s, where he served in a variety of roles including Managing Director of Bloomingdale’s By Mail. Mr. Senk serves as a director of MD Beauty, Inc. and Bare Escentuals.

Mr. Marlow has served as President of the Urban Brand, Worldwide since July 2001. Prior to joining the Company, for the period from September 2000 to July 2001, Mr. Marlow served as Executive Vice President of Merchandising, Product Development, Production and Marketing at Chicos FAS, Inc., a clothing retailer. Previously, he was Senior Vice President at Saks Fifth Avenue from November 1998 to September 2000, where he was responsible for all Saks Fifth Avenue private brand product development. From January 1995 to November 1998, Mr. Marlow served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Henri Bendel, a division of The Limited Brands, Inc.

Mr. Ross joined Urban Outfitters in October 1997 and assumed responsibility for the Controller position in early 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ross had been the Controller for American Appliance, Inc., a northeast regional appliance retail chain. Previous to his 13-year tenure in the retail industry, Mr. Ross worked in the public accounting sector in audit and advisory services. Mr. Ross obtained his CPA license in 1994.

Mr. Zausner rejoined the Company in February 2003 as a consultant and in July 2003 became its Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Zausner originally joined the Company in 1980 and became its Director of Inventory Management in 1988 and its Secretary in 1990. Mr. Zausner retired from the Company in 1996.

Mr. Belair co-founded Urban Outfitters in 1970 and has been a director since its incorporation in 1976. He has served as Principal of The ZAC Group, a financial advisory firm, during the last fifteen years. Previously, he was a managing director of Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated. Mr. Belair is also a director of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.

Mr. Cherken, a director since 1989, has been a partner in the law firm of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania since 1984 and until January, 2007 served as Co-Chair of its Real Estate Group.

Mr. Lawson, a director since 1985, has been an independent consultant and private investor since November 2001. From November 2001 until November 2003, he also served as Executive Director of M&A International Inc., a global organization of merger and acquisition advisory firms. From 1980 until November 2001, Mr. Lawson was Chief Executive Officer of Howard, Lawson & Co., an investment banking and corporate finance firm. Howard, Lawson & Co. became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of FleetBoston Financial Corporation in March 2001.

Mr. Strouse, a director since 2002, serves as Chief Operating Officer of Wind River Holdings, L.P. since 1999, and as its President since 2003. Wind River oversees a diversified group of industrial, service and real estate businesses.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics, applicable to all employees, officers and directors of the Company, that provides an ethical and legal framework for business practices and conduct to which such persons must adhere. Any waivers to the code will be disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K. A copy of this code is available on our website atwww.urbanoutfittersinc.comor you may request a copy in writing addressed to: Investor Relations, Urban Outfitters, Inc., 5000 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1495.

Section 16(a). Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Other Information

Other information required by Item 10 relating to the Company’s directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith are listed in the accompanying index on page F-1.

(2) Financial Statement Schedule

None

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The Exhibits listed below are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report.

 

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

    3.1

  3.1**

 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 9, 2004.
    3.2

  3.2**

 Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 9, 2004.
    3.3

  3.3**

 Amended and Restated Bylaws are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 of the Company’s Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-1 (File No. 33-69378)8-K filed on September 24, 1993.March 2, 2009.
  10.1

10.1**

 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 10, 2004.

10.2**

 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association.Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2007.
  10.3+

10.3**

 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2008.

10.4+**

Urban Outfitters 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixBof the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 26, 2004.2004 and Amendment No. 1 to the Urban Outfitters 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixA of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 25, 2005.
  10.4+

10.5+**

 1997 Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 31, 1997.
  10.5+

10.6+**

 Urban Outfitters 401(k) Savings Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 3, 1999.
  10.6+

10.7+**

 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixA of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 17, 2000.
  14.1

10.8+**

 Code2008 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixA of Conduct and Ethicsthe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 28, 2008.

10.9+**

Urban Outfitters Executive Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixBof the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 25, 2005.

21.1**

List of Subsidiaries is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2004.
  21.1*List of Subsidiaries.1, 2009.

Exhibit
Number

Description23.1**

  23.1* Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.LLP is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2009.
  23.2*Consent of KPMG LLP.

31.1*

 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer.

31.2*

 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer.

32.1***

 Section 1350 Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer.Officer is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2009.

32.2***

 Section 1350 Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer.Officer is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2009.


*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewithPreviously filed and incorporated by reference.
***Previously furnished and incorporated by reference.
+Compensatory plan

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.
June 19, 2009 By: 

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

March 30, 2007

By:

/s/ RICHARD A. HAYNE

  Richard A. Hayne
  President
 By:

/s/ GLEN T. SENK

  PresidentGlen T. Senk

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

 

Title

 

Date(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    RICHARD A. HAYNE        

Richard A. Hayne

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Director

By:
 March 30, 2007

/s/ JOHN E. KYEES

John E. Kyees

(Principal Financial Officer)

Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2007

/s/    ROBERT ROSS        

Robert Ross

Controller

March 30, 2007

/s/    GLEN T. SENK        

Glen T. Senk

Director and Executive Vice President; President, Anthropologie, Inc.

March 30, 2007

/s/    SCOTT A. BELAIR        

Scott A. Belair

Director

March 30, 2007

/s/    HARRY S. CHERKEN, JR.        

Harry S. Cherken, Jr.

Director

March 30, 2007

/s/    JOEL S. LAWSON III        

Joel S. Lawson III

Director

March 30, 2007

/s/    ROBERT H. STROUSE        

Robert H. Strouse

Director

March 30, 2007

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP

F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—KPMG LLP

F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2006

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005



F-5

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005



F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005



F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 30, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 30, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Urban Outfitters, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

April 18, 2005, except as to the

fourth paragraph of Note 2,

which is as of March 31, 2006

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

   January 31,
   2007  2006
ASSETS    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $27,267  $49,912

Marketable securities

   132,011   141,883

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $849 and $445, respectively

   20,871   14,324

Inventories

   154,387   140,377

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   27,286   33,993

Deferred taxes

   4,583   4,694
        

Total current assets

   366,405   385,183
        

Property and equipment, net

   445,698   299,291

Marketable securities

   62,322   64,748

Deferred income taxes and other assets

   24,826   19,983
        
  $899,251  $769,205
        
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

  $57,934  $41,291

Accrued compensation

   5,092   12,673

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   72,292   79,544
        

Total current liabilities

   135,318   133,508

Deferred rent

   88,650   74,817
        

Total liabilities

   223,968   208,325
        

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 10)

    

Shareholders’ equity:

    

Preferred shares; $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

   —     —  

Common shares; $.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 164,987,463 and 164,831,477 issued and outstanding, respectively

   17   16

Additional paid-in capital

   128,586   134,146

Retained earnings

   542,396   426,190

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   4,284   528
        

Total shareholders’ equity

   675,283   560,880
        
  $899,251  $769,205
        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
   2007  2006  2005 

Net sales

  $1,224,717  $1,092,107  $827,750 

Cost of sales, including certain buying, distribution and occupancy costs

   772,796   643,501   489,000 
             

Gross profit

   451,921   448,606   338,750 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   287,932   240,907   190,384 
             

Income from operations

   163,989   207,699   148,366 

Interest income

   6,531   5,486   2,577 

Other income

   353   775   435 

Other expenses

   (715)  (1,563)  (1,186)
             

Income before income taxes

   170,158   212,397   150,192 

Income tax expense

   53,952   81,601   59,703 
             

Net income

  $116,206  $130,796  $90,489 
             

Net income per common share:

    

Basic

  $0.71  $0.80  $0.56 
             

Diluted

  $0.69  $0.77  $0.54 
             

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   164,679,786   163,717,726   161,419,898 
             

Diluted

   168,652,005   169,936,041   167,303,450 
             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(in thousands, except share data)

  

Compre-

hensive
Income

  Common Shares Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  

Unearned

Compen-

sation

  Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Income
  Total 
   Number of
Shares
  Par
Value
     

Balances as of February 1, 2004

  159,553,084  $16 $83,271  $—    $204,905 $1,938  $290,130 

Net income

 $90,489  —     —    —     —     90,489  —     90,489 

Foreign currency translation

  1,002  —     —    —     —     —    1,002   1,002 

Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of tax

  (470) —     —    —     —     —    (470)  (470)
           

Comprehensive income

 $91,021        
           

Restricted stock issued

  400,000   —    5,766   (5,766)  —    —     —   

Amortization of unearned compensation

  —     —    —     708   —    —     708 

Exercise of stock options

  2,941,804   —    6,917   —     —    —     6,917 

Tax effect of exercises

  —     —    13,468   —     —    —     13,468 
                          

Balances as of January 31, 2005

  162,894,888   16  109,422   (5,058)  295,394  2,470   402,244 

Net income

 $130,796  —     —    —     —     130,796  —     130,796 

Foreign currency translation

  (1,909) —     —    —     —     —    (1,909)  (1,909)

Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of tax

  (33) —     —    —     —     —    (33)  (33)
           

Comprehensive income

 $128,854        
           

Amortization of unearned compensation

  —     —    —     1,153   —    —     1,153 

Exercise of stock options

  1,936,589   —    15,230   —     —    —     15,230 

Tax effect of exercises

  —     —    13,399   —     —    —     13,399 
                          

Balances as of January 31, 2006

  164,831,477   16  138,050   (3,905)  426,190  528   560,880 

Net income

 $116,206  —     —    —     —     116,206  —     116,206 

Foreign currency translation

  3,614  —     —    —     —     —    3,614   3,614 

Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of tax

  142  —     —    —     —     —    142   142 
           

Comprehensive income

 $119,962        
           

Share-based compensation

  —     —    3,497   —     —    —     3,497 

Unearned compensation reclass

  —     —    (3,905)  3,905   —    —    

Exercise of stock options

  1,375,986   1  6,350   —     —    —     6,351 

Tax effect of exercises

  —     —    5,394   —     —    —     5,394 

Share repurchase

  (1,220,000)  —    (20,801)  —     —    —     (20,801)
                          

Balances as of January 31, 2007

  164,987,463  $17 $128,586  $—    $542,396 $4,284  $675,283 
                          

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
   2007  2006  2005 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

  $116,206  $130,796  $90,489 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   55,713   39,340   31,858 

Provision for deferred income taxes

   (4,959)  (6,870)  (2,884)

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

   (5,394)  13,399   13,468 

Stock-based compensation expense

   3,497   1,153   708 

Loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment, net

   1,393   (631)  —   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

Increase in receivables

   (6,371)  (6,002)  (1,635)

Increase in inventories

   (13,416)  (41,597)  (35,651)

Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets

   6,848   (14,201)  (6,231)

Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

   33,600   33,804   59,873 
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   187,117   149,191   149,995 
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Cash paid for property and equipment

   (212,029)  (127,730)  (75,141)

Proceeds on disposition of property and equipment

   —     3,769   —   

Purchases of marketable securities

   (182,653)  (416,018)  (586,093)

Sales and maturities of marketable securities

   193,274   396,304   530,301 
             

Net cash used in investing activities

   (201,408)  (143,675)  (130,933)
             

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Exercise of stock options

   6,351   15,230   6,917 

Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises

   5,394   —     —   

Share Repurchases

   (20,801)  —     —   
             

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

   (9,056)  15,230   6,917 
             

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   702   (565)  433 
             

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (22,645)  20,181   26,412 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   49,912   29,731   3,319 
             

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $27,267  $49,912  $29,731 
             

Supplemental cash flow information:

    

Cash paid during the year for:

    

Interest

  $153  $18  $126 
             

Income taxes

  $52,535  $79,182  $44,970 
             

Non-cash investing activities—Accrued capital expenditures

  $14,618  $27,986  $4,296 
             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Nature of Business

Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the “Company” or “Urban Outfitters”), which was founded in 1970 and originally operated by a predecessor partnership, was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1976. The principal business activity of the Company is the operation of a general consumer product retail business through retail stores, three catalogs and four web sites. As of January 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company operated 207 and 175 stores, respectively. Stores located in the United States totaled 195 as of January 31, 2007 and 165 as of January 31, 2006, while operations in Europe and Canada included nine stores and three stores as of January 31, 2007, respectively and seven stores and three stores as of January 31, 2006, respectively. In addition, the Company engages in the wholesale distribution of apparel to approximately 1,500 better specialty retailers worldwide.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fiscal Year-End

The Company operates on a fiscal year ending January 31 of each year. All references to fiscal years of the Company refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, the Company’s fiscal 2007 ended on January 31, 2007.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Stock Split

On August 17, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one split of the Company’s common shares in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The additional shares issued as a result of the stock split were distributed on September 23, 2005 to shareholders of record as of September 6, 2005. All relevant amounts included in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of less than three months at the time of purchase. As of January 31, 2007 and 2006, cash and cash equivalents included cash on hand, cash in banks and money market accounts.

Marketable Securities

The Company’s marketable securities may be classified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities represent those securities that the Company has both the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Interest on these securities, as well as amortization of discounts and premiums, is included in interest income. Available-for-sale securities represent debt securities that do not meet the classification of held-to-maturity, are not actively traded and are carried at fair value, which approximates amortized cost. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized. When available-for-sale securities are sold, the cost of the securities is specifically identified and is used to determine the realized gain or loss. Securities classified as current have maturity dates of less than one year from the balance sheet date. Securities classified as long-term have maturity dates greater than one year from the balance sheet date. Marketable securities as of January 31, 2007 and 2006 were classified as available-for-sale.

The Company also includes disclosure about its investments that are in an unrealized loss position for which other-than-temporary impairments have not been recognized in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Applications to Certain Investments”.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consists of amounts due from our wholesale customers as well as credit card receivables. The activity of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

   Balance at
beginning of
year
  Additions  Deductions  Balance at
end of
year

Year ended January 31, 2007

  $445  $2,192  $(1,788) $849

Year ended January 31, 2006

  $586  $1,156  $(1,297) $445

Year ended January 31, 2005

  $651  $922  $(987) $586

Inventories

Inventories, which consist primarily of general consumer merchandise held for sale, are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method and includes the cost of merchandise and import related costs, including freight, import taxes and agent commissions. A periodic review of inventory quantities on hand is performed in order to determine if inventory is20

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

properly stated at the lower of cost or market. Factors related to current inventories such as future consumer demand and fashion trends, current aging, current and anticipated retail markdowns or wholesale discounts, and class or type of inventory are analyzed to determine estimated net realizable value. Criteria utilized by the Company to quantify aging trends includes factors such as average selling cycle and seasonality of merchandise, the historical rate at which merchandise has sold below cost during the average selling cycle, and merchandise currently priced below original cost. A provision is recorded to reduce the cost of inventories to the estimated net realizable values, if required. The majority of inventory at January 31, 2007 and 2006 consisted of finished goods. Unfinished goods and work-in-process were not material to the overall net inventory value.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and primarily consist of store related leasehold improvements, buildings and furniture and fixtures. Depreciation and amortization are typically computed using the straight-line method over five years for furniture and fixtures, the lesser of the lease term or useful life for leasehold improvements, three to ten years for other operating equipment and 39 years for buildings. Major renovations or improvements that extend the service lives of our assets are capitalized over the extension period or life of the improvement, whichever is less.

The Company reviews long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This determination includes evaluation of factors such as future asset utilization and future net undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets. Management believes there has been no impairment of the Company’s long-lived assets as of January 31, 2007.

Deferred Rent

Rent expense on leases is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease period. The excess of rent expense over the actual cash paid is recorded as deferred rent. In addition, certain store leases provide for contingent rentals when sales exceed specified break-point levels that are weighted based upon historical cyclicality. For leases where achievement of these levels is considered probable based on cumulative lease year revenue versus the established breakpoint at any given point in time, contingent rent is accrued. This may be expensed concurrently with minimum rent which is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease period.

Operating Leases

The Company leases its retail stores under operating leases. Many of the lease agreements contain rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and contingent rent provisions or some combination of these items. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the accounting lease term.

The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period commencing on the date that the premises is turned over from the landlord. The lease period includes the construction period to make the leased space suitable for operating during which time the Company is not permitted

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

to occupy the space. For purposes of calculating straight-line rent expense, the commencement date of the lease term reflects the date the Company takes possession of the building for initial construction and setup.

The Company classifies tenant improvement allowances on its consolidated financial statements within deferred rent that will be amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the straight-line period. Tenant improvement allowance activity is presented as part of cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale for retail store sales or when merchandise is shipped to customers for wholesale and direct-to-consumer sales, net of estimated customer returns. Payment for merchandise at the Company’s stores and direct-to-consumer business is by cash, check, credit card, debit card or gift card. Therefore, the Company’s need to collect outstanding accounts receivable for its retail and direct-to-consumer business is negligible and mainly results from returned checks or unauthorized credit card charges. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for its wholesale business accounts receivable which management reviews on a monthly basis and believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses and billing adjustments. Deposits for custom orders are recorded as a liability and recognized as a sale upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. These custom orders, typically for upholstered furniture, have not been material. Gift card sales to customers are initially recorded as liabilities and recognized as sales upon redemption.

Sales Return Reserve

We record a reserve for estimated product returns where the sale has occurred during the period reported, but the return is likely to occur subsequent to the period reported and may otherwise be considered in-transit. The reserve for estimated in-transit product returns is based on our most recent historical return trends. If the actual return rate or experience is materially higher than our estimate, additional sales returns would be recorded in the future. The activity of the sales returns reserve for the years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

   Balance at
beginning of
year
  Additions  Deductions  Balance at
end of
year

Year ended January 31, 2007

  $6,390  $29,376  $(26,850) $8,916

Year ended January 31, 2006

  $4,527  $21,959  $(20,096) $6,390

Year ended January 31, 2005

  $2,312  $14,898  $(12,683) $4,527

Cost of Sales, Including Certain Buying, Distribution and Occupancy Costs

Cost of sales, including certain buying, distribution and occupancy costs includes the following: the cost of merchandise; merchandise markdowns; obsolescence and shrink; store occupancy costs including rent and depreciation; customer shipping expense for direct-to-consumer orders; in-bound

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and outbound freight; U.S. Customs related taxes and duties; inventory acquisition and purchasing costs; warehousing and handling costs and other inventory acquisition related costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses includes expenses such as (i) direct selling and selling supervisory expenses; (ii) various corporate expenses such as information systems, finance, loss prevention, human resources, and executive management expenses; and (iii) other associated general expenses.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

The Company includes shipping and handling revenues in net sales and shipping and handling costs in cost of sales. The Company’s shipping and handling revenues consist of amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling merchandise. Shipping and handling costs include shipping supplies, related labor costs and third-party shipping costs.

Advertising

The Company expenses the costs of advertising when the advertising occurs, except for direct-to-consumer advertising, which is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefit. Advertising costs primarily relate to our direct-to-consumer marketing which are composed of catalog printing, paper, postage and other costs related to production of photographic images used in our catalogs and on our web sites. These costs are amortized over the period in which the customer responds to the marketing material and is determined based on historical response trends to a similar season’s advertisement. Amortization rates are reviewed on a regular basis during the fiscal year and may be adjusted if the predicted customer response appears materially different than the historical response rate. The Company has the ability to measure the response rate to direct marketing early in the course of the advertisement based on its customers’ reference to a specific catalog or by product placed and sold. The average amortization period for a catalog or web promotion is typically three months. If there is no expected future benefit, the cost of advertising is expensed when incurred. Advertising costs reported as prepaid expenses were $2,155 and $2,747 as of January 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Advertising expenses were $35,882, $30,033 and $22,455 for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Start-up Costs

The Company expenses as incurred all start-up and organization costs, including travel, training, recruiting, salaries and other operating costs.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Web Site Development Costs

The Company capitalizes applicable costs incurred during the application and infrastructure development stage and expenses costs incurred during the planning and operating stage. During fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not capitalize any internal-use software development costs because substantially all costs were incurred during the planning stage, and costs incurred during the application and infrastructure development stage were not material.

Income Taxes

The Company applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which principally utilizes a balance sheet approach to provide for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company files a consolidated United States federal income tax return (see Note 7).

Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to the potential dilution from the exercise of securities, such as stock options and non-vested shares, into shares of common stock as if those securities were exercised (see Note 9).

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, (“SFAS No. 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments, including grants of employee stock options and non-vested shares, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values at date of grant. Under SFAS No. 123R, companies are required to measure the cost of services received in exchange for stock options and similar awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize this cost in the income statement over the period during which an award recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.

Effective February 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method and as such, results for prior periods have not been restated. Under this transition method, the measurement and the method of amortization of costs for share-based payments granted prior to, but not vested as of January 31, 2006, are based on the same estimate of the grant-date fair value and the same amortization method that was previously used in the SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosure. The Company has used the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black Scholes”) model to determine

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the grant date fair value of its share-based awards and FASB Interpretation No. 28 (“FIN 28”) to amortize its stock-based compensation expense over the vesting term and has continued using these two methods under SFAS No. 123R. Compensation expense is recognized based on grant date fair value only for share-based payments expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures at the date of grant based on historical experience and future expectations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company utilized the intrinsic-value based method of accounting under APB No. 25, and related interpretations, and adopted the pro forma disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure.” The effect of forfeitures on the pro forma expense amounts were recognized based on actual historical forfeitures. No compensation expense was historically recognized for the Company’s stock option plans because the quoted market price of the Company’s common shares at the date of grant was not in excess of the amount an employee must pay to acquire the common shares (see Note 8).

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of two subsets—net income and other comprehensive income. Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income relate to foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities. The foreign currency translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes because these adjustments relate to indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries. As of January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, accumulated other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation adjustments of $4,667, $1,053 and $2,962, respectively and unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of tax of $383, $525 and $490, respectively. In addition, reclassification adjustments for realized losses of $8 for fiscal 2007, and realized gains of $32 and $123 for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively, are included in net income.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of the Company’s foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates while income and expense accounts are translated at the average rates in effect during the year. Translation adjustments are not included in determining net income, but are included in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses are included in operating results and were not material in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable and accounts payable. Management believes that the carrying value of these assets and liabilities are representative of their respective fair values.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable. The Company manages the credit risk associated with cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities by investing

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

with high-quality institutions and, by policy, limiting the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Receivables from third-party credit cards are processed by financial institutions, which are monitored for financial stability. The Company periodically evaluates the financial condition of its wholesale segment customers. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts reflects current market conditions and management’s assessment regarding the likelihood of collecting its accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from maintaining cash accounts in excess of such limits. Management believes that it is not exposed to any significant risks related to its cash accounts.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 could have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 could have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC staff published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 addresses quantifying the financial statement effects of misstatements, specifically, how the effects of prior year uncorrected errors must be considered in quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. This statement is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the EITF ratified its consensus on Issue No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement”. EITF 06-3 addresses what type of government assessments should be included within the scope of EITF 06-3, and how such government assessments should be presented in the income statement. The EITF concluded that the scope of EITF 06-3 includes any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer and may include, but is not limited to, sales, use, value added and some excise taxes. In addition the EITF also

concluded that the presentation of taxes, within the scope of EITF 06-3, on either a gross or net basis, is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed pursuant to APB Opinion No. 22, “Disclosure of Accounting Policies”. In addition, for any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, a company

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

should disclose the amounts of those taxes in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The EITF observed that because EITF 06-3 requires only the presentation of additional disclosures, an entity would not be required to re-evaluate its existing policies related to taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer. EITF 06-3 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt the disclosure requirements of EITF 06-3 effective February 1, 2007; however, since the Company presents its revenue on a net basis, no further disclosure under EITF 06-3 will be required.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation was issued to clarify the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The new standard also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 is expected to result in adjustments to our tax contingency reserves and deferred income taxes which could be material, with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of FIN 48 nor measured its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

3. Marketable Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security as of January 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

   Amortized
Cost
  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
(Losses)
  

Fair

Value

As of January 31, 2007

       

Municipal bonds:

       

Maturing in less than one year

  $33,287  $ —    $(126) $33,161

Maturing after one year through four years

   62,784   9   (471)  62,322
                
   96,071   9   (597)  95,483
                

Auction rate instruments:

       

Maturing in less than one year

   98,850   —     —     98,850
                
  $194,921  $9  $(597) $194,333
                

As of January 31, 2006

       

Municipal bonds:

       

Maturing in less than one year

  $30,891  $12  $(95) $30,808

Maturing after one year through four years

   65,472   1   (725)  64,748
                
   96,363   13   (820)  95,556
                

Auction rate instruments:

       

Maturing in less than one year

   111,075   —     —     111,075
                
  $207,438  $13  $(820) $206,631
                

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Proceeds from the sale and maturities of available-for-sale securities were $193,274, $396,304 and $530,301 in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company included in other income, gross realized losses of $8 in fiscal 2007, and gross realized gains in fiscal 2006 and 2005 of $32 and $123 respectively.

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s marketable securities with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired aggregated by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at January 31, 2007 and January 31, 2006, respectively.

  January 31, 2007 
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 
  Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Loss
  

Fair

Value

 Unrealized
Loss
  Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Loss
 

Total municipal bonds

 $35,802 $(110) $54,670 $(487) $90,472 $(597)
                     
  January 31, 2006 
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 
  Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Loss
  Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Loss
  Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Loss
 

Total municipal bonds

 $32,996 $(236) $48,489 $(584) $81,485 $(820)
                     

The unrealized losses presented above are primarily due to changes in market interest rates. At January 31, 2007 and 2006, there were a total of 53 and 50 issued securities, respectively, with an unrealized loss position within the Company’s portfolio. The Company has the intent and the ability to hold these securities for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the initial cost of the investment. The Company has the ability to realize the full value of all of these investments upon maturity.

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is summarized as follows:

   January 31, 
   2007  2006 

Land

  $543  $543 

Buildings

   92,376   4,331 

Furniture and fixtures

   153,594   115,946 

Leasehold improvements

   370,435   280,640 

Other operating equipment

   27,175   26,961 

Construction-in-progress

   15,903   39,200 
         
   660,026   467,621 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (214,328)  (168,330)
         

Total

  $445,698  $299,291 
         

Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $53,895, $37,080 and $29,777, respectively.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

   January 31,
   2007  2006

Accrued rents and estimated property taxes

  $6,966  $5,968

Gift certificates and merchandise credits

   17,268   14,348

Accrued construction

   10,704   23,982

Accrued income taxes

   10,592   12,075

Other current liabilities

   26,762   23,171
        

Total

  $72,292  $79,544
        

6. Line of Credit Facility

On September 30, 2004, we renewed and amended our line of credit facility (the “Line”). The Line is a three-year revolving credit facility with an accordion feature allowing an increase in available credit to $50,000 at our discretion, subject to a seven day request period. As of January 31, 2007, the credit limit under the Line is $42,500. The Line contains a sub-limit for borrowings by our European subsidiaries that are guaranteed by us. Cash advances bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.60% based on our achievement of prescribed adjusted debt ratios. The Line subjects us to various restrictive covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios and covenants such as fixed charge coverage and adjusted debt. The covenants also include limitations on our capital expenditures, ability to repurchase shares and the payment of cash dividends. On November 30, 2006 we amended our line to increase our capital expenditure limit and add additional subsidiaries that are permitted to borrow. As of January 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Line. As of and during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, there were no borrowings under the Line. Outstanding letters of credit and stand-by letters of credit under the Line totaled approximately $32,341 as of January 31, 2007. The available borrowing, including the accordion feature, under the Line was $17,659 as of January 31, 2007. We plan to renew the Line during fiscal 2008 and expect the renewal will include the expansion of the available credit limit under the Line to an amount that will satisfy our letter of credit needs through fiscal 2010.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

7. Income Taxes

The components of income before income taxes are as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
   2007  2006  2005

Domestic

  $161,985  $206,902  $145,844

Foreign

   8,173   5,495   4,348
            
  $170,158  $212,397  $150,192
            

The components of the provision for income tax expense are as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
   2007  2006  2005 

Current:

    

Federal

  $48,893  $68,865  $54,700 

State

   8,442   17,588   6,546 

Foreign

   1,576   2,018   1,341 
             
   58,911   88,471   62,587 
             

Deferred:

    

Federal

   6   (2,388)  (2,133)

State

   (2,333)  (3,628)  (665)

Foreign

   284   (2,049)  107 
             
   (2,043)  (8,065)  (2,691)
             

Change in valuation allowances

   (2,916)  1,195   (193)
             
  $53,952  $81,601  $59,703 
             

The Company’s effective tax rate was different than the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate for the following reasons:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
   2007  2006  2005 

Expected provision at statutory U.S. federal tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

  2.3  4.2  4.4 

Foreign taxes

  (2.3) (0.1) (0.2)

Federal rehabilitation tax credits

  (2.8) —    —   

Other

  (0.5) (0.7) 0.6 
          

Effective tax rate

  31.7% 38.4% 39.8%
          

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of January 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

   January 31, 
   2007  2006 

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Prepaid expenses

  $(1,911) $(1,504)

Depreciation

   (14,718)  (11,892)
         

Gross deferred tax liabilities

   (16,629)  (13,396)
         

Deferred tax assets:

   

Deferred rent

   34,681   29,819 

Inventories

   3,721   3,460 

Accounts receivable

   648   572 

Net operating loss carryforwards

   2,692   3,361 

Accrued salaries and benefits, and other

   3,602   3,181 
         

Gross deferred tax assets, before valuation allowances

   45,344   40,393 
         

Valuation allowances

   (231)  (3,147)
         

Net deferred tax assets

  $28,484  $23,850 
         

Net deferred tax assets are attributed to the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. As of January 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, $17,335 and $16,696 were attributable to U.S. federal, $8,204 and $6,778 were attributed to state jurisdictions and $2,945 and $376 were attributed to foreign jurisdictions.

As of January 31, 2007, certain non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $2,692 that do not expire. At January 31, 2006, The Company had a full valuation allowance for certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards where it was uncertain the carryforwards would be utilized. In fiscal 2007, the Company determined that it was more likely than not, that these carryforwards would be utilized; therefore, valuation allowances were reversed. The Company had no valuation allowance for certain other foreign net operating loss carryforwards where management believes it is more likely than not the tax benefit of these carryforwards will be realized. As of January 31, 2007 and 2006, the non-current portion of net deferred tax assets aggregated $23,901 and $19,156, respectively.

The cumulative amount of the Company’s share of undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries for which no deferred taxes have been provided was $17,007 as of January 31, 2007. These earnings are deemed to be permanently re-invested to finance growth programs.

As of January 31, 2007, the Company has tax contingency reserves of approximately $5,945 included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The Company recorded interest, net of any applicable related tax benefit, on potential tax contingencies as a component of its tax expense.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

8. Share-Based Compensation

The Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan both authorize up to 10,000,000 common shares, which can be granted as restricted shares, incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. Grants under these plans generally expire ten years from the date of grant, thirty days after termination, or six months after the date of death or termination due to disability. Stock options generally vest over a period of three or five years, with options becoming exercisable in equal installments over the vesting period. However, options granted to non-employee directors generally vest over a period of one year and certain grants issued during fiscal 2006 and 2005 fully vested within six months of the date of grant. The Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Plan”), which replaced the previous 1987, 1992 and 1993 Stock Option Plans (the “Superseded Plans”), expired during the year ended January 31, 2004. Individual grants outstanding under the 1997 Plan and certain of the Superseded Plans have expiration dates, which extend into the year 2010. Grants under the 1997 Plan and the Superseded Plans generally expire ten years from the date of grant, thirty days after termination, or six months after the date of death or termination due to disability. Stock options generally vest over a five year period, with options becoming exercisable in equal installments of twenty percent per year. As of January 31, 2007, 940,750 and 701,600 common shares were available for grant under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively.

Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, the Company recorded $2,344 of stock compensation related to stock option awards as well as related tax benefits of $499 in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, or less than $0.01 for both basic and diluted earnings per share. During fiscal 2007, the Company granted 125,000 stock options. The estimated fair value of options granted was calculated using a Black Scholes option pricing model. The Black Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The Company uses historical data on exercise timing to determine the expected life assumption. The risk-free rate of interest for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on U.S. Government Securities Treasury Constant Maturities over the expected term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The table below outlines the weighted average assumptions for these grants:

   Fiscal
2007
  Fiscal
2006
  Fiscal
2005
 

Expected life, in years

  6.8  6.5  5.3 

Risk-free interest rate

  4.8% 4.4% 4.3%

Volatility

  54.4% 55.5% 51.0%

Dividend rate

  —    —    —   

Based on the Company’s historical experience, the Company has assumed an annualized forfeiture rate of 2% for its unvested options. Under the true-up provisions of SFAS No. 123R, the Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeiture rate is lower than it estimated, and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture is higher than estimated.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

No compensation expense related to stock option grants has been recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2006 and 2005, as all of the options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Results for prior periods have not been restated.

SFAS No. 123R requires the Company to present pro forma information for the comparative period prior to the adoption as if it had accounted for all its employee stock options under the fair value method of the original SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per common share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation for the years ended January 31, 2006 and 2005.

   Fiscal Year Ended
January 31,
 
   2006  2005 

Net income—as reported

  $130,796  $90,489 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in the determination of net income as reported, net of related tax effect

   710   427 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effect

   (60,462)  (24,912)
         

Net income—pro forma

  $71,044  $66,004 
         

Net income per common share—basic—as reported

  $0.80  $0.56 
         

Net income per common share—basic—pro forma

  $0.43  $0.41 
         

Net income per common share—diluted—as reported

  $0.77  $0.54 
         

Net income per common share—diluted—pro forma

  $0.42  $0.40 
         

Total compensation cost of stock options granted but not yet vested, as of January 31, 2007, was $1,677, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.57 years.

The following tables summarize activity under all stock option plans for the respective periods:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
         2007              2006              2005      
   (In thousands, except per share data)

Weighted-average fair value of options granted per share

  $11.62  $13.62  $7.14

Intrinsic value of options exercised

  $20,822  $33,080  $35,103

Cash received from option exercises

  $6,351  $15,230  $6,917

Actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option exercises

  $5,394  $13,399  $13,468

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Information regarding options under these plans is as follows:

   Fiscal 2007
   Shares  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(years)
  

Aggregate
Intrinsic

Value

(1)

Options outstanding at beginning of year

   15,022,161  $14.76    

Options granted

   125,000   19.93    

Options exercised

   (1,375,986)  4.63    

Options forfeited

   (140,000)  4.00    

Options expired

   (275,500)  22.58    
          

Options outstanding at end of year

   13,355,675   15.61  7.0  $117,396
          

Options outstanding expected to vest at end of year

   13,091,600   15.61  7.0  $115,075
          

Options exercisable at end of year

   11,474,894   17.27  7.1  $81,816
          

Weighted average fair value of options granted per share

  $11.62      
          

(1)The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based upon the closing price of the Company’s common shares on January 31, 2007, which was $24.40, and the exercise price of the underlying options, provided the closing price exceeded the exercise price.

The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options as of January 31, 2007:

   Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable

Range of Exercise Prices

  Amount
Outstanding
  

Wtd. Avg.

Remaining

Contractual
Life

  Wtd.
Avg.
Exercise
Price
  Amount
Exercisable
  Wtd.
Avg.
Exercise
Price

$  0.00 - $  3.11

  2,690,115  4.5  $1.84  2,040,034  $1.64

$  3.12 - $  6.22

  2,367,750  6.0   4.34  1,458,950   4.32

$  6.23 - $  9.33

  256,000  5.0   9.10  144,000   9.12

$12.44 - $15.56

  3,255,660  7.4   14.33  3,167,660   14.32

$18.67 - $21.78

  110,000  9.4   19.59  —     —  

$21.79 - $24.89

  280,000  8.0   23.57  265,000   23.63

$24.90 - $28.00

  202,000  8.4   27.45  202,000   27.45

$28.01 - $31.11

  4,194,150  8.8   30.98  4,197,250   30.98
            
  13,355,675  7.0   15.61  11,474,894   17.27
            

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Non-vested Shares

The Company may make non-vested share awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. A non-vested shares award is an award of common shares that is subject to certain restrictions during a specified period, such as an employee’s continued employment combined with the Company achieving certain financial goals. The Company holds the common shares during the restriction period, and the grantee cannot transfer the shares before the termination of that period. The grantee is, however, generally entitled to vote the common shares and receive any dividends declared and paid on the Company’s common shares during the restriction period. Unearned compensation was recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity and amortized over the vesting period of the award as stock compensation expense in the Company’s results of operations. During the year ended January 31, 2005, the Company granted 400,000 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value of $5,766 and a weighted average grant date fair value of $14.42 per share. Share-based compensation resulting from this grant of $1,153 is included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income for each fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and $708 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, as well as, related tax benefits of $484, $763 and $0, respectively. As of January 31, 2007, this is the only grant of non-vested shares and none of these shares have vested as of January 31, 2007. Total unrecognized compensation cost of non-vested shares granted, as of January 31, 2007 was $ 2,752, which is expected to be recognized over the period of 2.4 years.

9. Net Income Per Common Share

The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used for the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
   2007  2006  2005

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

  164,679,786  163,717,726  161,419,898

Effect of dilutive options and restricted stock

  3,972,219  6,218,315  5,883,552
         

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  168,652,005  169,936,041  167,303,450
         

For the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase 4,763,375 shares ranging in price from $15.48 to $31.11, options to purchase 1,256,688 shares ranging in price from $23.55 to $31.11 and options to purchase 1,114,000 shares ranging in price from $13.72 to $23.76, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for the respective fiscal years because the effect was anti-dilutive.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases its stores under non-cancelable operating leases. The following is a schedule by year of the future minimum lease payments for operating leases with original terms in excess of one year:

Fiscal Year

   

2008

  $92,280

2009

   95,008

2010

   89,598

2011

   77,963

2012

   74,234

Thereafter

   290,702
    

Total minimum lease payments

  $719,785
    

Amounts noted above include commitments for 27 executed leases for stores not opened as of January 31, 2007. The majority of our leases allow for renewal options between five and ten years upon expiration of the initial lease term. The store leases generally provide for payment of direct operating costs including real estate taxes. Certain store leases provide for contingent rentals when sales exceed specified levels. Additionally, the Company has entered into store leases that require a percentage of total sales to be paid to landlords in lieu of minimum rent.

Rent expense consisted of the following:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
   2007  2006  2005

Minimum and percentage rentals

  $73,058  $61,603  $54,992

Contingent rentals

   1,991   3,309   2,329
            

Total

  $75,049  $64,912  $57,321
            

The Company also has commitments for un-fulfilled purchase orders for merchandise ordered from our vendors in the normal course of business, which are liquidated within 12 months, of $26,769 and contracts with store construction contractors, fully liquidated upon the completion of construction, which is typically within 12 months, of $4,922.

Benefit Plan

Full and part-time U.S. based employees who are at least 18 years of age are eligible after six months of employment to participate in the Urban Outfitters 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, employees can defer 1% to 25% of compensation as defined. The Company makes matching contributions in cash of $0.25 per employee contribution dollar on the first 6% of the employee contribution. The employees’ contribution is 100% vested while the Company’s matching contribution vests at 20% per year of employee service. The Company’s contributions were $812, $691 and $527 for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Contingencies

The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising from normal business activities. Management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

11. Related Party Transactions

Harry S. Cherken, Jr., a director of the Company, is a partner in the law firm of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP (“DBR”), which provides real estate, regulatory and general legal services to the Company. Fees paid to DBR during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $1,493, $1,458 and $1,162, respectively. Fees due to DBR as of January 31, 2007 for services rendered were approximately $572.

The McDevitt Company, a real estate company, acted as a broker in substantially all of the Company’s new real estate transactions during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005. The Company has not paid any compensation to The McDevitt Company, but the Company has been advised that The McDevitt Company has received commissions from other parties to such transactions. Wade L. McDevitt is the brother-in-law of Scott Belair, one of the Company’s directors and is president and the sole shareholder of The McDevitt Company. There were no amounts due to The McDevitt Company as of January 31, 2007.

12. Segment Reporting

The Company is a national retailer of lifestyle-oriented general merchandise with two reporting segments—“Retail” and “Wholesale”. The Company’s Retail segment consists of the aggregation of its three brands operating through 207 stores under the retail names “Urban Outfitters,” “Anthropologie” and “Free People” and includes their direct marketing campaigns which consist of three catalogs and four web sites as of January 31, 2007. Our retail stores and their direct marketing campaigns are considered operating segments. Net sales from the retail segment accounted for more than 93% of total consolidated net sales for the years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The remainder is derived from the Company’s Wholesale segment that manufactures and distributes apparel to the retail segment and to approximately 1,500 better specialty retailers worldwide.

The Company has aggregated its retail stores and associated direct marketing campaigns into a Retail segment based upon their unique management, customer base and economic characteristics. Reporting in this format provides management with the financial information necessary to evaluate the success of the segments and the overall business. The Company evaluates the performance of the segments based on the net sales and pre-tax income from operations (excluding inter-company charges) of the segment. Corporate expenses include expenses incurred and directed by the corporate office that are not allocated to segments. The principal identifiable assets for each operating segment are inventories and property and equipment. Other assets are comprised primarily of general corporate assets, which principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other assets, and which are typically not allocated to the Company’s segments. The Company accounts for inter-segment sales and transfers as if the sales and transfers were made to third parties making similar volume purchases.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the policies described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Both the retail and wholesale segment are highly diversified. No customer comprises more than 10% of sales. A summary of the information about the Company’s operations by segment is as follows:

   Fiscal Year 
   2007  2006  2005 

Net sales

    

Retail operations

  $1,150,511  $1,038,842  $800,361 

Wholesale operations

   79,687   57,363   29,389 

Intersegment elimination

   (5,481)  (4,098)  (2,000)
             

Total net sales

  $1,224,717  $1,092,107  $827,750 
             

Income from operations

    

Retail operations

  $159,338  $202,790  $153,217 

Wholesale operations

   18,319   13,888   4,091 

Intersegment elimination

   (1,504)  (891)  (300)
             

Total segment operating income

   176,153   215,787   157,008 

General corporate expenses

   (12,164)  (8,088)  (8,642)
             

Total income from operations

  $163,989  $207,699  $148,366 
             

Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment

    

Retail operations

  $53,458  $36,924  $29,623 

Wholesale operations

   437   156   154 
             

Total depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment

  $53,895  $37,080  $29,777 
             

Inventories

    

Retail operations

  $141,850  $131,704  $94,914 

Wholesale operations

   12,537   8,673   4,082 
             

Total inventories

  $154,387  $140,377  $98,996 
             

Property and equipment, net

    

Retail operations

  $443,879  $297,509  $191,695 

Wholesale operations

   1,819   1,782   1,097 
             

Total property and equipment, net

  $445,698  $299,291  $192,792 
             

Cash paid for property and equipment

    

Retail operations

  $211,533  $126,790  $74,954 

Wholesale operations

   496   940   187 
             

Total cash paid for property and equipment

  $212,029  $127,730  $75,141 
             

The Company has foreign operations in Europe and Canada. Revenues and long-lived assets, based upon our domestic and foreign operations, are as follows:

  

Net sales

    

Domestic operations

  $1,132,053  $1,026,589  $781,894 

Foreign operations

   92,664   65,518   45,856 
             

Total net sales

  $1,224,717  $1,092,107  $827,750 
             

Property and equipment, net

    

Domestic operations

  $405,345  $260,398  $174,778 

Foreign operations

   40,353   38,893   18,014 
             

Total property and equipment, net

  $445,698  $299,291  $192,792 
             

F-27