UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

(Mark One)

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007October 2, 2009

 

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from            to            

 

Commission File No. 000-25393

 


VARIAN, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 


 

Delaware 77-0501995
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
3120 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California 94304-1030
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(650) 213-8000

(Telephone number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

(Title of each class) (Name of each exchange on which registered)
NoneCommon Stock, $0.01 par value 

NoneThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

(NASDAQ Global Select Market)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

Preferred Stock Purchase RightsNone

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated filer and large“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x                        Accelerated filer  ¨                        Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Accelerated filer  ¨

Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Smaller reporting company  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant based upon the closing sale price of the Common Stock on March 30, 2007,April 3, 2009, as reported by the Nasdaq NationalGlobal Select Market, was approximately $1,766,286,000.$698,111,000.

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of November 16, 200720, 2009 was 30,439,000.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:approximately 29,012,000.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Document Description

  10-K Part

Certain sections, identified by caption, of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 20082010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”)

  III

 


An index of exhibits filed with this Form 10-K is located on page 40-43.


VARIAN, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2007OCTOBER 2, 2009

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

      Page

PART I

  

Item 1.

  Business  34
  Executive Officers  1011
  Investor Information  1011

Item 1A.

  Risk Factors  1011

Item 1B.

  Unresolved Staff Comments  1618

Item 2.

  Properties  1618

Item 3.

  Legal Proceedings  1719

Item 4.

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  1719

PART II

  

Item 5.

  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  1820

Item 6.

  Selected Financial Data  1921

Item 7.

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  2022

Item 7A.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk  3539

Item 8.

  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  3641

Item 9.

  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  3641

Item 9A.

  Controls and Procedures  3641

Item 9B.

  Other Information  3742

PART III

  

Item 10.

  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  3843

Item 11.

  Executive Compensation  3843

Item 12.

  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  3844

Item 13.

  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  3944

Item 14.

  Principal Accounting Fees and Services  3944

PART IV

  

Item 15.

  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules  4045

PART I

 

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

Throughout this Report, and particularly inItem 1—Business,Item 1A—Risk Factors andItem 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, there are forward-looking statements that are based upon our current expectations, estimates and projections, and that reflect our beliefs and assumptions based on information available to us at the date of this Report. In some cases, you can identify these statements by words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” and other similar terms. These forward-looking statements include (but are not limited to) those relating to the timing and amount of anticipated restructuring costs and related cost savings, whether and when backlog will result in actual sales, and our expected effective annual tax rate and anticipated capital expenditures in fiscal year 2008.2010.

 

We caution investors that forward-looking statements are only our current expectations about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Some of the important factors that could cause our results to differ are discussed inItem 1A—Risk Factors. We encourage you to read that section carefully.

 

Other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: the pace and extent of improvements in global economic conditions; whether we will succeed in new product development, release, commercialization, performance and acceptance; whether we can achieve continued growth in sales for industrial applications and/or stronger growth in sales for life science, environmental, energy, and/or applied research and other applications; whether we can achieve continued sales growth in Europe, and Asia PacificNorth America and/or growth in sales in the U.S.;Latin America; risks arising from the timing of shipments, installations and the recognition of revenues on certain magnet-basedresearch products, including nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) spectroscopy systems, magnetic resonance (“MR”) imaging systems and fourier transform mass spectrometry (“FTMS”) systems and superconducting magnets; the impact of shifting product mix on profit margins; competitive products and pricing; economic conditions in our various product and geographic markets; whether we will see continued and timely delivery of key raw materials and components by suppliers; foreign currency fluctuations that could adversely impact revenue growth andand/or earnings; whether we will see continued investment in capital equipment; whether we will see reducedequipment, in particular given global liquidity and credit conditions; demand from customers that operate in cyclical industries; the extent to which global liquidity and credit conditions impact the collectability of any delay or reduction inaccounts receivable from our customers; the extent and timing of government funding for research; our ability to successfully evaluate, negotiate and integrate acquisitions; the actual costs, timing and benefits of restructuring activities (such as the employee reductions and other actions announced in January 2009 and our Northern California facilitiesoperations consolidation) and other efficiency improvement activities (such as our global procurement, initiative)lower-cost manufacturing and outsourcing initiatives); the timing and amount of discrete tax events;share-based compensation; the timingability of our company and amountAgilent Technologies, Inc. (“Agilent”) to complete the announced acquisition of share-based compensation expense;our company by Agilent (the “Merger”); the affect on our business operations and financial results of the announcement, the pendency, and activities relating to the completion of the Merger; the affect of certain restrictions on our ability to conduct our business under the Merger agreement with Agilent; and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We disclaim any intent orundertake no special obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1. Business

Item 1.Business

 

GENERAL

 

Overview and History

 

Varian, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells and services scientific instruments (including analytical instruments, research products and related software, consumable products, accessories and services) and vacuum products (and related accessories and services). For financial reporting purposes, our operations are grouped into two corresponding segments: Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies. These segments, their products and the applications in which they are used are described below.

 

Varian, Inc. became a separate, public company on April 2, 1999. Until that date, our business was operated as the Instruments business of Varian Associates, Inc. (“VAI”). The Instruments business (which

included the business units that designed, developed, manufactured, marketed, sold and serviced scientific instruments and vacuum technologies,products, and a business unit that provided contract electronics manufacturing services) was contributed by VAI to us. On that date, VAI distributed to holders of its common stock one share of our common stock and one share of common stock of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (“VSEA”), which was formerly operated as the Semiconductor Equipment business of VAI, for each share of VAI common stock outstanding on April 2, 1999 (the “Distribution”). VAI retained its Health Care Systems business and changed its name to Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“VMS”). These transactions were accomplished under the terms of an Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement dated as of January 14, 1999 by and among us, VAI and VSEA (the “Distribution Agreement”).

 

Until March 11, 2005, we operatedOn July 26, 2009, Varian, Agilent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Agilent”) and Cobalt Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Agilent (“Merger Sub”), entered into an electronics manufacturing businessAgreement and Plan of Merger (the “Electronics Manufacturing business”“Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which was a contract manufacturerMerger Sub will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of electronic assembliesthe conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, merge with and subsystems such as printed circuit boards for original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). On that date,into Varian and Varian will survive the Electronics Manufacturing business was sold to Jabil Circuit, Inc. As a result, our former Electronics Manufacturing business has been treatedmerger and continue as a discontinued operation throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-Kwholly owned subsidiary of Agilent (the “Merger”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and is therefore excluded from all disclosures pertainingsubject to our continuing operations.the conditions thereof, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of common stock of Varian issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into the right to receive $52.00 in cash, without interest. On October 5, 2009, Varian’s stockholders approved the Merger. The Merger remains subject to regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of certain other closing conditions.

 

Business Segments and Products

 

For financial reporting purposes, we have two business segments: Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies, which are described below.

 

The products and activities of these two segments are related in certain important respects, particularly product applications. In many ways, we view, manage, operate and describe our Company as being comprised of a single business. Described below are our products by segment, but then separately described are the primary applications for those products.

 

Scientific Instruments Products

 

Our Scientific Instruments segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells and services products used in a broad range of life science (such as pharmaceutical), environmental, energy, and industrialapplied research and other applications requiring identification, quantification and analysis of the elemental, molecular, physical or biological composition or structure of liquids, solids or gases. These products include analytical instruments (primarily mass spectrometers, chromatography instruments, optical spectroscopy instruments and dissolution testing equipment), magnet-basedresearch products (including nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”), spectroscopy systems, magnetic resonance (“MR”) imaging systems, Fourier Transform mass spectrometry (“FTMS”) systems, X-ray crystallography systems and superconducting magnets used in certain of these and other scientific systems)instruments), and consumable products (including

(including columns for gas and liquid chromatography and products for the preparation of samples prior to analysis by gas and liquid chromatography). and related software, accessories and services.

 

Mass spectrometry (“MS”) is a technique for analyzing the individual chemical components of substances by ionizing them and determining their mass-to-charge ratios. Our MS products incorporate various technologies for measuring mass, including single-quadrupole, triple-quadrupole and ion trap mass spectrometers, FTMS systems and mass spectrometer leak detection systems. We combine our mass spectrometers with other instruments to create high-performance instruments such as liquid chromatograph mass spectrometers (“LC/MS”), liquid chromatograph nuclear magnetic resonance mass spectrometers (“LC-NMR/MS”), gas chromatograph mass spectrometers (“GC/MS”), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers (“ICP-MS”) and liquid chromatograph and gas chromatograph Fourier Transform mass spectrometers (“LC- and GC-FTMS”). We also offer related software accessories and consumable productsaccessories for these and other similar instruments.

 

Chromatography is a technique for separating, identifying and quantifying the individual chemical components of substances based on the physical and chemical characteristics specific to each component. Our chromatography instruments include gas chromatographs (“GC”), high-performance liquid chromatographs (“HPLC”), gel permeation chromatographs (“GPC”), flash chromatography instruments and sample automation products and data analysis software.products. For certain applications, mass spectrometers are sold as a detector for GC or HPLC systems. We also offer related accessoriessoftware and consumable productsaccessories for these and other similar instruments.

Optical spectroscopy is a technique for analyzing the individual chemical components of substances based on the absorption or emission of electromagnetic radiation of specific wavelengths of light. Our optical spectroscopy instruments include atomic absorption (“AA”) spectrometers, inductively coupled plasma-optical emissions spectrometers (“ICP-OES”), inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometers (“ICP-MS”), fluorescence spectrophotometers, ultraviolet-visible (“UV-Vis”) spectrophotometers, Fourier Transform infrared (“FT-IR”) spectrophotometers, near-infrared (“NIR”) spectrophotometers, Raman spectrometers and sample automation products. We also offer related software accessories and consumable productsaccessories for these and other similar instruments.

 

Dissolution testing is a technique for in-vitro analysis of the rate of release of a drug under controlled conditions. Our dissolution testing products include equipment,dissolution apparatus and other testers, software accessories and consumable productsaccessories used in analyzing the rate of release and testing the physical characteristics of different dosage forms. Our UV-Vis spectrophotometers are often used with these products.

Certain of our software products are used to automate, process, collect, manage, analyze and store data generated by analytical instruments, and are often used for regulatory compliance purposes with respect to such data. These products include chromatography data systems that allow users to control LC and GC instruments from multiple suppliers on a single platform and other software products tailored to specific instruments and applications.

 

Magnetic resonance is a non-destructive instrumental technique that uses electromagnetic fields to interact with the magnetic property of atomic nuclei in order to determine and analyze the molecular content and structure of liquids and solids. Our NMR spectroscopy systems are used in the study of liquids containing chemical substances, including proteins, nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and carbohydrates. They are also used for the analysis of solid materials such as membranes, crystals, plastics, rubbers, ceramics and polymers. Our MR imaging systems are used to obtain non-invasive images of primarily biological materials and to probe the chemical processes within these materials. Our MR imaging systems include human and other imaging systems used in research. We also offer probes, imaging gradient coils, consoles, software and other accessories to customers seeking to enhance NMR and MR imaging performance. Our magnet-basedresearch products also include FTMS systems.

Fourier Transform mass spectrometer (“FTMS”) systems, which is a technique for determining the function and structural characterization of proteins and other biomolecules. Superconducting magnets are used in our NMR spectroscopy, MR imaging, FTMS and other scientific (including life science) systems. OurWe also sell these magnets are used in our NMR, MR imaging and FTMS systems, and are also sold directly to OEMsoriginal equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) (such as manufacturers of high-field MR imaging systems) and end-users.

 

OurX-ray crystallography is an analytical technique that uses a beam of X-rays to determine the arrangement of atoms within a crystal. X-ray crystallography is used in pharmaceutical and other research

laboratories to determine the structure of both small and large molecules (such as proteins). We also offer related software, accessories and consumable products for these systems.

Certain of our software products are used to automate, process, collect, manage and store data generated by analytical instruments and magnet-based systems, and are often used for regulatory compliance purposes with respect to such data.research products. These products include: chromatography data systems that allow users to control LC and GC instruments from multiple vendors on a single platform;include NMR and MR imaging data acquisition, processing, analysis and display software for our complete line of NMR and MR imaging systems;systems, FTMS and X-ray crystallography systems, and other software products tailored to specific instruments and applications.

 

Our consumable products are used in numerous laboratory applications and include: sample preparation consumables such as solid phase extraction (“SPE”) and filtration products used in tube formats to clean up and extract complex samples for toxicology and environmental applications and in 96-well plate formats for drug discovery and clinical research applications; micro volume SPE pipette tips used in protein research; polymeric particles used in the synthesis and purification of therapeutic compounds, and for clinical diagnostic applications; HPLC and GC columns used to separate target analytes prior to UV detection or mass spectrometry analysis; HPLC columns and media used in health science applications for the analysis of thermally labile compounds; GC columns used in industrialvarious applications for the analysis and purification of thermally stabile compounds; GPC columns and standards for the analysis of polymers; flash chromatography consumables used in early stage drug research; and other HPLC and GC stationary phase chemistries and column dimensions for a wide range of life science and industrial scienceother applications. Consumable products also include scientific instrument parts and supplies such as filters and fittings for GC and HPLC systems; xenon lamps and cuvettes for UV-Vis-NIR, fluorescence, FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy instruments; and graphite furnace tubes, hollow cathode lamps and specialized sample introduction glassware for our AA, ICP-OES and ICP-MS products. Other consumable products include on-site screening and laboratory-based kits for drugs of abuse testing (“DAT”) on urine or saliva samples, such as in pre-employment screening, criminal justice and toxicology testing.

Vacuum Technologies Products

 

Our Vacuum Technologies segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells and services a broad range of products used to create, control, measure and test vacuum environments in life science, industrialenvironmental, energy, and scientificapplied research and other applications where ultra-clean, high-vacuum environments are needed. Vacuum Technologies’ customers are typically OEMs that manufacture equipment for these applications. Products include a wide range of high and ultra-high vacuum pumps (diffusion, turbomolecular and ion getter), intermediate vacuum pumps (rotary vane, sorption and dry scroll), vacuum instrumentation (vacuum control instruments, sensor gauges and meters) and vacuum components (valves, flanges and other mechanical hardware). Its products also include helium mass spectrometry and helium-sensing leak detection instruments used to identify and measure leaks in hermetic or vacuum environments. In addition to product sales, we also offer a wide range of services including an exchange and rebuild program, assistance with the design and integration of vacuum systems, applications support and training in basic and advanced vacuum technologies.

 

Information Rich Detection Products

 

We refer to certain of the products described above as “information rich detectors” (“IRD”). IRD products include mass spectrometers, NMR systems, MR imaging systems, X-ray crystallography systems and FT-IR instruments. All of these products provide users with multi-dimensional layers of information and/or higher sensitivity, which are critical to the ability to optimize analyses and processes. IRD instruments typically provide broad-based qualitative capabilities for screening of compounds in complex mixtures, precise quantitative information for determining the relative concentrations of the compounds and dimensions of structural information for confirming the identity of the analytes. Our IRD products also include superconducting magnets and vacuum pumps, consumables and other components and products used either in or with our IRD instruments or sold directly to OEMs and end-users for use in IRD products; we also provide various services in connection with our IRD products.

Customers and Applications

 

Our products are sold principally for use in life science applications or for use in industrial applications (although many products are used in both applications). Life science applications include(including the study of biological processes and the testing of biological materials.materials), environmental applications (including food safety and testing of air, water and soil), energy applications (including raw materials), and applied research and other applications. Many of our products are used in more than one of these applications.

 

Almost all of the Scientific Instruments products described above are or can be used in life science applications, such as by pharmaceutical companies in drug development, manufacturing (including process control) and quality control; and by research hospitals and universities in basic chemistry, biological, biochemistry and health care research. Life science customers include branded and generic pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology and toxicology companies, governmental agencies and numerous academic institutions and research hospitals. The Vacuum Technologies products described above similarly are or can be used in a broad range of life science applications, such as in mass spectrometers for analytical analysis and in linear accelerators for cancer therapy. In fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, sales into life science applications accounted for approximately 40%, to 45% and 45%, respectively, of our total sales (these are estimates based on assumptions of how our products are likely to be used by customers, and are provided only as an indication of a historical trend).

 

Almost all of the Scientific Instruments products described above are or can also be used in industrialenvironmental, energy, applied research and other applications, such as by environmental laboratories in performing chemical analyses of water, soil, air, solids, and food and other products; by petroleum and natural gas companies in performing chemical analyses in exploration, refining, quality control, distribution and research; in alternative energy, such as biofuels and solar energy; by agricultural, chemical, mining and metallurgy and food and beverage processing companies in conducting research and quality control; and by other industrial, governmental, academic and academicother research laboratories in forensic analysis, materials science and general research. The Vacuum Technologies products described above are or can be used in a broad range of industrial applications, such as in the manufacture of flat-panel displays, solar energy panels, CRT tubes, decorative coating, functional coatings, disks for memory storage, architectural glass, optical lenses and automobile components; in food packaging; in the testing of aircraft components, automobile airbags, refrigeration components and industrial processing equipment; in high-energy physics research (suchresearch; in various nuclear energy applications: in nanotechnology applications such as linear accelerators)surface scanning and nanomaterials fabrication; and in the manufacture and test of semiconductors and fabrication of metrology equipment.

Marketing and Sales

 

We market and sell most of our products through our own direct sales organizations, although a few products and services are marketed and sold through independent sales representatives and distributors. Inin certain countries and for certain products and services, sales are made through various sales representative and distributor arrangements. To support this marketing and sales structure, we have sales and service offices in numerous locations around the world.

 

We compete for the most partsell our products on a global basis. Sales outside of North America accounted for 66%69%, 61%68% and 59%66% of sales for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, respectively. As a result, our customers increasingly require service and support on a worldwide basis. We have sales and service offices located throughout North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America. We have invested substantial financial and management resources to develop anand maintain international infrastructure to meet the needs of our customers worldwide.

 

Demand for our products depends on many factors, including the level of capital expenditures of our customers, the rate of economic growth in applications and geographies where we sell our major marketsproducts and competitive considerations. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our sales in fiscal year 2007, 2006 or 2005.years 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

We experience some cyclical patterns in sales of our products. Generally, sales and earnings in the first quarter of our fiscal year are lower when compared to the preceding fourth fiscal quarter, primarily because there are fewer working days in the first fiscal quarter (October to December). Sales and earnings

in our third fiscal quarter are usually flat to down sequentially compared to the second fiscal quarter, primarilyin part because there are a number of holidays in the early part of the quarter, especially in Europe, and the June quarter-end has no significant customer year ends to influence orders. Our fourth fiscal quarter sales and earnings are often the highest in the fiscal year compared to the other three quarters, primarily because many government- and research-related customers spend budgeted money before their own fiscal years end. This cyclical pattern can be influenced by other factors, including the timing of revenue recognition on large systems, general economic conditions, acquisitions, new product introductions and products requiring long manufacturing and installation lead times (such as NMR, MR imaging and FTMS systems and superconducting magnets).

 

We believe that we differentiate our products from those of our competitors by our responsiveness to customer requirements, as determined through market research. Although specific customer requirements can vary depending on applications, customers generally demand superior performance, ease of use, high quality, high productivity and low cost of ownership. We have responded to these customer demands by regularly introducing new products focused on these requirements in the markets we serve.requirements.

 

Backlog

 

Our recorded backlog was $236 million at October 2, 2009, $235 million at October 3, 2008 and $241 million at September 28, 2007, $247 million at September 29, 2006 and $218 million at September 30, 2005.2007. Orders exceeded revenues in fiscal year 2009, however, the resulting increase in backlog was largely offset by the impact of the stronger U.S dollar on the value of orders denominated in other currencies. The decrease in backlog from September 29, 200628, 2007 to September 28, 2007October 3, 2008 was primarily due to a net reduction in unfulfilled orders for MR imaging systems andmagnets from third-party OEMs even though orders for these magnets increased in fiscal year 2008 compared to a lesser extent for vacuum products. These decreases werethe prior year. This decrease was partially offset by strong order volume for analytical instruments and to a lesser extent the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar on orders denominated in other currencies. For the period from September 30, 2005 to September 29, 2006, backlog increased primarily due to stronger order volume in our Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies segments. In particular, increased orders for MR imaging systems, newer analytical instruments and vacuum products, as well as acquisitions made during fiscal year 2006, drove the increase in backlog.

 

We include in backlog purchase orders or production releases under blanket purchase orders that have firm delivery dates. Recorded backlog in U.S. dollars is impacted by foreign currency fluctuations.fluctuations on orders denominated in non-U.S. dollars. In addition, recorded backlog might not result in sales because of cancellations or other factors.factors (although such events have historically been infrequent).

 

Most of our products are shipped soon after they are ordered by customers, with the time between order receipt and shipment being as short as a few days for some products and less than a fiscal quarter for most others. However, other products, in particular certain magnet-based products, can have significantly longer lead times, sometimes in excess of one year. Significant shipments often occur in the last month of each quarter, in part because of how customers place orders and schedule shipments.

We believe that approximately 95%over 85% of orders included in our backlog at September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 will result in revenue before the end of fiscal year 2008.2010.

 

Competition

 

Competition in markets we serveour industries is primarily based upon the performance capabilities of products, technical support and after-marketafter-sales service, the manufacturer’s reputation as a technological leader and product pricing. We believe that performance capabilities are the most important of these criteria.

 

The markets in which we compete are highly competitive and are characterized by the application of advanced technology. There are numerous companies that specialize in, and a number of larger companies that devote a significant portion of their resources to, the development, manufacture, sale and service of products that compete with those that we manufacture, sell or service. Many of our competitors are well-known manufacturers with a high degree of technical proficiency. In addition, competition is intensified by the ever-changing nature of the technologies in the industries in which we are engaged. The markets for our products are characterized by specialized manufacturers that often have strength in narrow segments or niches of these markets. While the absence of reliable statistics makes it difficult to determine our relative market position in our industry segments, we are one of the principal manufacturers in our primary fields.

We compete with many companies. Our Scientific Instruments segment competes primarily with Agilent, Bruker, JEOL, PerkinElmer, Shimadzu, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waters and other smaller suppliers. Our Vacuum Technologies segment competes primarily with Adixen (Alcatel), Edwards, INFICON, Oerlikon Leybold, Pfeiffer, Ulvac and other smaller suppliers.

 

Manufacturing

 

Our principal manufacturing activities consist of precision assembly, test, calibration and certain specialized machining activities. For most of our products, we subcontract a portion of the assembly and machining, but perform all other assembly, test and calibration functions. For some products, we have subcontracted all manufacturing operations.

 

We believe that the ability to manufacture reliable products in a cost-effective manner is critical to meeting the “just-in-time” delivery and other demanding requirements of our OEM and end-user customers. We monitor and analyze product lead times, warranty data, process yields, supplier performance, field data on mean time between failures, inventory turns, repair response times and other indicators so that we can continuously improve our manufacturing processes.

 

We are continuously looking for opportunities to outsource manufacturing to third parties who can provide the same quality at lower costs, and to consolidate our own manufacturing into fewer and lower-cost locations. These initiatives raise certain risks and uncertainties, which are discussed inItem 1A—Risk Factors—Restructuring and Other Efficiency Improvement Activities.

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we operated 1312 significant manufacturing facilities located throughout the world. Our Scientific Instruments segment had manufacturing facilities in Palo Alto, California; Walnut Creek, California; Lake Forest, California; Ft. Collins, Colorado; Randolph, Massachusetts; Cary, North Carolina; Melbourne, Australia; Grenoble, France; Middelburg, Netherlands; Wroclaw, Poland; Church Stretton, United Kingdom; and Yarnton, United Kingdom. Our Vacuum Technologies segment had manufacturing facilities in Lexington, Massachusetts, and Turin, Italy.

 

All of our significant manufacturing facilities, other than our facility in Wroclaw, Poland, have been certified as complying with the International Organization for Standardization Series 9000 Quality Standards (“ISO 9000”).

 

Raw Materials

 

Our manufacturing operations require a wide variety of raw materials, electronic and mechanical components, chemical and biochemical materials and other supplies, some of which are occasionally in short supply. In addition, use of certain of our products requires reliable and cost-effective supply of certain raw materials. For example, end-users of our magnet-based products require helium to operate those products. Helium can be, and at various times has been, difficult to source and is becoming more expensive. If we or our customers cannot obtain sufficient quantities of helium, it could prevent us from shipping and installing superconducting magnets, which could result in our inability to recognize revenues on magnet-based products. In addition,Although we have taken and will continue to take steps to reduce the volume of helium required for the manufacture and use of these products, shortages of helium could result in even higher helium prices, and thus higher operating costs for magnet-based products, which could impact demand for those products.

products as well as our profit margins on those products and related services. Changes in the availability or price of certain other key raw materials (such as copper) or components could increase our costs or our customers’ costs to acquire and operate our products, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

We manufacture some components used in our products. Other components, including certain consumables materials and electronic components and subassemblies, are purchased from other manufacturers. Most of the raw materials, components and supplies we purchase are available from a number of different suppliers; however, a number of items—such as wire used in superconducting magnets, and electronic subassemblies and final assemblies used in scientific instruments—are purchased from limited or single sources of supply. Disruption of these sources could cause delays or reductions in shipment of our products or increases in our costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Research and Development

 

We are actively engaged in basic and applied research, development and engineering programs designed to develop new products and to improve existing products. During fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, we spent $65.2$56.4 million, $59.7$71.8 million and $53.9$65.2 million, respectively, on research, development and related engineering activities. Over this period, the focus of our research and development activities has been shifting more toward information rich detectionIRD and consumable products. We intend to continue to conduct extensive research and development activities, with a continued emphasis on information rich detectionIRD products such as magnet-based products, mass spectrometers (including vacuum products for use in OEMour mass spectrometers)spectrometers and those of other OEMs) and certain consumable products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and market new products on a cost-effective and timely basis, that such products will compete favorably with products developed by others or that our existing technology will not be superseded by new discoveries or developments.

 

Customer Service and Support

 

We believe that our customer service and support are an integral part of our competitive strategy. As part of our support services, our applications and technical support staff providesprovide individual assistance in supporting customers’ specific applications needs, solving analysis problems and integrating vacuum components. We offer training courses and periodically send our customers information on applications development.

 

Our products generally include a 90-day to one-year warranty, but in some countries and for some products we offer longer warranties. ServiceFor most of our products, service contracts may be purchased by customers to cover equipment no longer under warranty. Service work not performed under warranty or service contract is generally performed on a time-and-materials basis. We install and service our products primarily through our own field service organization, although certain distributors and sales representatives are able and contracted to perform some field services.

 

Patent and Other Intellectual Property Rights

 

We have a policy of seeking patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection in the U.S. and other countries for developments, improvements and inventions originating within our organization that are incorporated in our products or that fall within our fields of interest. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we owned over 330380 patents in the U.S. and over 650600 patents in other countries, and had numerous patent applications on file with various patent agencies worldwide. We intend to continue to file patent applications as we deem appropriate.

 

We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret and other legal, as well as contractual, restrictions on disclosure, copying and transferring title to protect our proprietary rights. We have trademarks, both registered and unregistered, that are maintained and enforced to provide customer recognition for our products in the marketplace. We also have agreements with third parties that provide for licensing of patented or proprietary technology. These agreements frequently include royalty-bearing licenses and technology cross-licenses.

Environmental Matters

 

Our operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws in the U.S., as well as laws in other countries, regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. These regulations increase the costs and actual and potential liabilities of our operations. However, our compliance with these regulations is not expected to have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, earningsresults of operations, financial condition or competitive position. For additional information on environmental matters, seeItem 1A—Risk Factors—Environmental Matters and—Governmental Regulations.

Employees

 

At September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we had approximately 3,9003,500 full-time and temporary employees and contract workers worldwide—approximately 1,4001,200 in North America, 1,5001,400 in Europe, 900800 in Asia Pacific and 100 in Latin America.

 

Executive Officers

 

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our executive officers, together with positions and offices held within the last five years by such executive officers.

 

Name

  Age  

Position (Business Experience)

  

Period

Garry W. Rogerson

  5557  

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

President and Chief Executive Officer

  2004-Present2008-Present
2004-2008

A. W. Homan

  President and Chief Operating Officer50  2002-2004Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary2006-Present
1999-2006

G. Edward McClammy

  5860

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

2008-Present
  

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  2002-Present

A. W. Homan

48Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary2006-Present
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary1999-20062002-2008

Martin O’Donoghue

  4951  

Senior Vice President, Scientific Instruments

2006-Present

Vice President, Scientific Instruments

  2006-Present
2003-2006
Vice President, Analytical Instruments2002-2003

Sergio Piras

  5860  

Senior Vice President, Vacuum Technologies

Vice President, Vacuum Technologies

  2006-Present
2000-2006

Gordon B. Tredger

49

Vice President, Analytical Instruments

President, Argonaut Technologies, Inc.

2006-Present
2005-2006
    

Senior Vice President, VacuumInstrumentation & Integration, Argonaut Technologies, Inc.

  2000-20062002-2005

Sean M. Wirtjes

  3740  

Vice President, Finance and Treasurer

Vice President and Controller

Controller

  2006-Present2008-Present
2006-2008
2004-2006

Robert W. Dean II

44

Controller

2008-Present
    Controller

Director of Finance, Center of Excellence, Applied Materials, Inc.

  2004-20062007-2008
    Assistant Controller

Director, Operations Finance, Applied Materials, Inc.

  2002-20042006-2007

Director, Regional Finance and Business Administration, Applied Materials, Inc.

2004-2006

 

Investor Information

 

Financial and other information relating to us can be accessed on the Investors page at our website. This can be reached from our main Internet website (http://www.varianinc.com) by clicking on “Investors.” On the Investors page at our website, we make available, free of charge, copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing them with or furnishing them to the SEC.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

 

Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe Announcement and Pendency of our Agreement to be Acquired by Agilent.    On July 26, 2009, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Agilent Technologies, Inc. (“Agilent”) pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, merge with and into the Company, and the Company will be the successor or surviving corporation of the merger and will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Agilent (“the Merger”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and subject to the

satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into the right to receive $52.00 in cash, without interest. The announcement and pendency of the Merger has adversely affected our business. Revenues and profitability are being adversely affected by customers’ uncertainty and employee and other disruptions as well as intensified competition from our competitors as they attempt to take advantage of the uncertainties. In addition, we have incurred legal and other expenses in connection with the pending Merger. All of these factors are likely to continue to adversely affect our business and have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to operate our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice, as well as to refrain from taking certain actions in the conduct of our business without Agilent’s prior written consent until the consummation of the Merger. Actions that may require Agilent’s consent include, but are not limited to, new indebtedness, capital expenditures, loans and investments, manufacturing and customer agreements, acquisitions, issuance of securities, and the repurchase of shares of the Company’s common stock. These restrictions could adversely affect our business and have an adverse affect on our financial condition or results of operations.

There is no assurance that the Merger with Agilent will occur. If the Merger is not completed, the share price of our common stock will change to the extent that the current market price of the Company’s common stock reflects an assumption that the Merger will be completed. In addition, under circumstances defined in the Merger Agreement, we might be required to pay a termination fee of $46 million. Finally, any disruptions to our business resulting from the announcement and pendency of the Merger will likely continue in the event the Merger is not completed.

Overall Economic Conditions.    As a result of current economic uncertainties, including with respect to global capital and credit markets and overall economic growth, our customers could experience financial difficulties and as a result modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our products or services or be unable to pay us on accounts receivable that are owed to the Company. In addition, our suppliers (including our key suppliers, discussed below), could experience credit or other financial difficulties that could result in delays in their ability to supply us with necessary raw materials, components or finished products. Any of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, we might find it more difficult or expensive to secure additional capital or credit to pursue actions we would consider beneficial to the Company or our stockholders, such as acquisitions, capital investments and/or repurchases of our common stock which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Customer Demand.    Demand for our products depends upon, among other factors, the level of capital expenditures by current and prospective customers, the rate of economic growth in the markets in which we compete, the level of government funding for research and the competitiveness of our products and services. Changes in any of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

We must continue to assess and predict customer needs, regulatory requirements and evolving technologies. We must develop new products, including enhancements to existing products, new services and new applications, successfully commercialize, manufacture, market and sell these products and protect

our intellectual property in these products. If we are unsuccessful in these areas, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

Variability of Operating Results.    We experience some cyclical patterns in sales of our products. Generally, sales and earnings in the first quarter of our fiscal year are lower when compared to the preceding fourth fiscal quarter, primarilyin part, because there are fewer working days in our first fiscal quarter (October to December). Sales and earnings in our third fiscal quarter are usually flat to down sequentially compared to the second fiscal quarter, primarily because there are a number of holidays in the early part of the quarter, especially in Europe, and the June quarter-end has no significant customer year ends to influence orders. Our fourth fiscal quarter sales and earnings are often the highest in the fiscal year

compared to the other three quarters, primarily because many government- and research-related customers spend budgeted money before their own fiscal years end. This cyclical pattern can be influenced by other factors, including the timing of revenue recognition on large systems, general economic conditions, acquisitions, new product introductions and products requiring long manufacturing and installation lead times (such as NMR, MR imaging and FTMS systems and superconducting magnets). Consequently, our results of operations may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.quarter, which can make it difficult to anticipate, compare and measure our results of operations on a quarterly basis.

 

For mostMost of our products we operate on a short backlog,are shipped soon after they are ordered by customers, with the time between order receipt and shipment being as short as a few days for some products and less than a fiscal quarter for most others. We also make significantHowever, other products, in particular certain magnet-based products, can have significantly longer lead times, sometimes in excess of one year. Significant shipments often occur in the last few weeksmonth of each quarter, in part because of how our customers place orders and schedule shipments. This can make it difficult for us to forecast our results of operations.

 

Certain of our magnet-based products (including NMR, MR imaging and FTMS systems, NMR probes, superconducting magnets and other related components) sell on long lead-times, sometimes in excess of one year. Certain of these systems and components sell for high prices; are complex; require development of new technologies and, therefore, significant research and development resources; are often intended for evolving research applications; often have customer-specific features, capabilities and acceptance criteria; and can be difficult to manufacture and require long lead times. If we are unable to meet these challenges, it could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, all of these factors can make it difficult for us to forecast the timing of revenue recognition and the gross profit on these products.

 

Changes in our effective tax rate can also create variability in our operating results. Our effective tax rate can be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries having lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries having higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof.thereof or by other discrete tax events. In addition, we are subject to examination of our income tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our income tax reserves and expense. Should actual events or results differ from our current expectations, charges against or credits to our income tax reserves andand/or expense may become necessary.necessary or changes in our unrecognized tax benefits could result. Any such adjustments or changes could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. All of this can make it difficult for us to forecast our effective tax rate.

 

Competition.    The industries in which we operate are highly competitive. We compete against numerous companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., most with global operations. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we have, which may enable them to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, take advantage of acquisition opportunities, achieve economies of scale and other cost reductions, compete on price or devote greater resources to research and development, engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales or managerial activities. OthersSome also have greater name recognition and geographic and market presence or lower cost structures than we do. In addition, weaker demand and excess capacity in our industries could cause greater price competition as our competitors seek to maintain sales volumes and market share. For the foregoing reasons, competition could result in lower revenues due to lost sales or price reductions, lower profit margins and loss of market share, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Although no single customer accounted for 10% or more of our sales in fiscal year 2007,2009, we do have important customers, the loss of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

New Product Development.    Technological innovation and new product development are important to maintain the competitive position of our products and to grow our sales and profit margins. We have historically dedicated a significant portion of our resources to research and development efforts as a means of generating new products and improving existing products, and intend to continue to conduct extensive research and development activities, with an emphasis on information rich detection products such as

magnet-based products, mass spectrometers (including vacuum products for use in mass spectrometers) and certain consumable products. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to improve existing products and/or develop new products on a cost-effective and timely basis, that such products will compete favorably with products developed by others or that our existing technology will not be superseded by new discoveries or developments. If we fail to improve existing products and/or develop new products on a timely basis, we could experience lower revenues and/or lower profit margins, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Key Suppliers and Raw Materials.    Some items we purchase for the manufacture of our products, including wire used in superconducting magnets, and electronic subassemblies and final assemblies used in scientific instruments, are purchased from limited or single sources of supply. We are undertaking to further outsource manufacturing of certain parts, components, subsystems and even finished products, often to single sources. Disruption of these sources could cause delays or reductions in shipments of our products or increases in our costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

In addition, the manufacturing and/or use of certain of our products require raw materials for which supply and price can fluctuate significantly. For example, end-users of our magnet-based products require helium to operate those products. Helium can be, and at various times has been, difficult to source and is becoming more expensive. If we or our customers cannot obtain sufficient quantities of helium, it could prevent us from shipping and installing superconducting magnets, which could result in our inability to recognize revenues on magnet-based products. In addition, shortages of helium could result in even higher helium prices and thus higher operating costs for magnet-based products, which could impact demand for those products. Changes in the availability or price of certain other key raw materials or components could increase our costs or our customers’ costs to acquire and operate our products, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Business Interruption.    Our facilities, operations and systems could be impacted by fire, flood, terrorism or other natural or man-made disasters. In particular, we have significant facilities in areas prone to earthquakes and fires, such as our production facilities and headquarters in California. Due to their limited availability, broad exclusions and prohibitive costs, we do not have insurance policies that would cover losses resulting from an earthquake. If any of our facilities or surrounding areas were to be significantly damaged in an earthquake, fire, flood or other disaster, it could disrupt our operations, delay shipments and cause us to incur significant repair or replacement costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Our employees based in certain countries outside of the U.S. are subject to factory-specific and/or industry-wide collective bargaining agreements. Of these, certain of our employees in Australia are subject to collective bargaining agreements that were recently renewed and will need to be again renewed inbefore April 2009.2012. A work stoppage, strike or other labor action at this or other of our facilities could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Intellectual Property.    Our success depends on our intellectual property. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and licensing arrangements to establish and protect that intellectual property, but these protections might not be available in all countries, might not be enforceable, might not fully protect our intellectual property and might not provide meaningful competitive advantages. Moreover, we might be required to spend significant resources to police and enforce our intellectual property rights, and we might not detect infringements of those intellectual property rights. If we fail to protect our intellectual property and enforce our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could suffer, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Other third parties might claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, and we may be unaware of intellectual property rights that we are infringing. Any litigation regarding intellectual property

of others could be costly and could divert personnel and resources from our operations. Claims of intellectual property infringement might also require us to develop non-infringing alternatives or enter into royalty-bearing license agreements. We might also be required to pay damages or be enjoined from

developing, manufacturing or selling infringing products. We sometimes rely on licenses to avoidmitigate these risks, but we cannot be assured that these licenses will be available in the future or on favorable terms. These risks could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Acquisitions.    We have acquired companies and operations and made minority equity investments in private companies, and intend tomay acquire companies and operations (and make minority equity investments in private companies) in the future, as part of our growth strategy. These acquisitions must be carefully evaluated and negotiated if they are to be successful. Once completed, acquired operations must be carefully integrated to realize expected synergies, efficiencies and financial results. Some of the challenges in doing this include retaining key employees, managing operations in new geographic areas, retaining key customers, integrating data systems, assessing (and if necessary implementing or improving) internal control over financial reporting and managing transaction costs. All of this must be done without diverting management and other resources from other operations and activities. With respect to minority equity investments, we often have limited ability to control how their business is conducted. Additionally, goodwill, acquisition-related goodwillintangible assets and minority equity investments in private companies are subject to regular impairment testing and potential impairment charges. For all of these reasons, minority equity investments or our failure to successfully evaluate, negotiate and integrate acquisitions could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Restructuring and Other Efficiency Improvement Activities.    We have undertaken restructuring activities (such as the employee reductions and other actions announced in January 2009 and our Northern California facilitiesoperations consolidation) and other efficiency improvement activities (such as our global procurement, initiative),lower-cost manufacturing and have announcedoutsourcing initiatives), and may undertake similar activities in the future, that we expect to result in certain costs and eventual cost savings. These costs and cost savings are based on estimates at the time of plan commitment as to the timing of activities to be completed and the timing and amount of related costs to be incurred. We could experience delays, business disruptions and employee turnover in connection with restructuring and other efficiency improvement activities and our estimates of the costs to complete and savings achieved by these activities could be inaccurate and/or change. As a result, these activities could have an adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Non-U.S. Operations and Currency Exchange Rates.    A significant portion of our manufacturing activities, customers, suppliers and employees are outside of the U.S. As a result, we are subject to various risks, including the following: duties, tariffs and taxes; restrictions on currency conversions, fund transfers or profit repatriations; import, export and other trade restrictions; protective labor regulations and union contracts; compliance with local laws and regulations, as well as U.S. laws and regulations (such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) as they relate to our non-U.S. operations; travel and transportation difficulties; and adverse developments in political or economic environments in countries where we operate. These risks could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Additionally, theCurrency Exchange Rates.    The U.S. dollar value of our sales and product and operating costs varies with currency exchange rate fluctuations. In order of magnitude, our sales are mainly denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, British pounds and Japanese yen, while our costs are mainly denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, Australian dollars and British pounds. Because we manufacture and sell in the U.S. and a number ofmany other countries, the impact that currency exchange rate fluctuations have on us is dependent on the interaction of a number of variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the relationships between various foreign currencies, the relative amount of our revenues and costs that are denominated in U.S. dollars or in U.S. dollar-linked currencies, customer resistance to currency-driven price changes and the suddenness and severity of changes in certain foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, we hedge most of our balance sheet exposures denominated in other-than-local currencies based upon forecasts of those exposures; in the event that these forecasts are overstated or understated during periods of currency volatility, foreign exchange losses could result. For all of these reasons, currency exchange fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Credit Risk.    We extend trade credit to many of our customers. We generally perform credit evaluations of these customers before extending credit. To some extent, we utilize letters of credit to mitigate credit risks. While we believe that we take appropriate steps to manage customer credit risk, our

customers could experience financial difficulties, in particular given current economic conditions, that could result in delays or difficulties in collecting on accounts receivable that are owed to the Company. This could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have cash and surplus funds that we invest, primarily in demand deposits, short-term U.S. Treasury securities and money market funds. We also purchase foreign exchange forward contracts in order to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations, which contracts are placed primarily with major financial institutions. We also accept letters of credit from financial institutions to ensure payment for sales of our products. Although we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, our foreign exchange forward contracts and letters of credit provided to us, are invested or placed with secure financial institutions, there is no assurance that these financial institutions will not default on their obligations to us, especially given global financial market conditions. Loss of principal on demand deposits or invested funds or a default on a foreign exchange forward contract or letter of credit could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Key Personnel.    Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of key personnel, including research and development, engineering, manufacturing, finance, administrative, marketing, sales and management personnel. The availability of qualified personnel and the cost to attract, motivate and retain them can vary significantly based on factors such as the strength of the general economy. However, even in weak economic periods, there is still intense competition for personnel with certain expertise in the geographic areas where we compete for personnel. In addition, certain employees have significant

institutional and proprietary technical knowledge, which could be difficult to quickly replace. Failure to attract, motivate and retain qualified personnel, who generally do not have employment agreements or post-employment non-competition agreements, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Certain Employee Benefit Plans.    Many of our U.S. employees and some of our U.S. retirees participate in health care plans under which we are self-insured. We maintain a stop-loss insurance policy that covers the cost of certain individually large claims under these plans. During eachEach year, our expenses under these plans are recorded based on actuarial estimates of the number and costs of expected claims, administrative costs and stop-loss premiums. These estimates are then adjusted at the end of each plan year to reflect actual costs incurred. Actual costs under these plans are subject to variability depending primarily upon participant enrollment and demographics, the actual number and costs of claims made and whether and how much the stop-loss insurance we purchase covers the cost of these claims. In the event that our cost estimates differ from actual costs, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.

 

We also maintain defined benefit pension plans for our employees in several countries outside of the U.S. In accordance with Statement ofAs required by the Financial Accounting Standards No.Board (“SFAS”FASB”) 87,Employers’ Accounting for PensionsStandards Codification topic (“ASC”) 715-30,Defined Benefit Plans-Pension,, we utilize a number of assumptions including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate in order to determine our defined benefit pension plan costs each year. These assumptions are set based on relevant long-term debt, equity and other market conditions in the countries in which the plans are maintained. We adjust these assumptions each year in response to corresponding changes in the underlying market conditions.conditions and expectations. Changes in these market conditions and expectations result in corresponding changes in our defined benefit pension plan assumptions, liabilities and costs. We could also curtail these plans, which could result in us incurring curtailment/settlement charges. In addition, changes in relevant government regulations in the countries in which our defined benefit pension plans are located and/or changes in the accounting rules applicable to these plans (including SFAS 87) could also impact our defined benefit pension plan liabilities and costs. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Environmental Matters.    Our operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws in the U.S., as well as laws in other countries, regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. These regulations increase the costs and potential liabilities of our operations. However, we do not currently anticipate that our compliance with these regulations will have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

As is described inItem 1—Business, we and VSEA are each obligated (under the terms of the Distribution Agreement) to indemnify VMS for one-third of certain costs (after adjusting for any insurance

proceeds and tax benefits recognized or realized by VMS for such costs) relating to (a) environmental matters. In that regard, VMS has been namedinvestigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities at certain facilities previously operated by theVAI and third-party claims made in connection with environmental conditions at those facilities, and (b) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or third parties asthird-party claims alleging that VAI or VMS is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended at ten(“CERCLA”) in connection with certain sites whereto which VAI is alleged to haveallegedly shipped manufacturing waste for recycling, treatment or disposal. In addition,disposal (the “CERCLA sites”). With respect to the facilities formerly operated by VAI, VMS is overseeing and, as applicable, reimbursing third parties forthe environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities, in most cases under the direction of, or in consultation with, federal, state and/or local agencies, inand handling third-party claims. VMS is also handling claims relating to the U.S., at certain current VMS or former VAI facilities. We are obligated to indemnify VMS for one-third of these environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds and taxes).CERCLA sites.

 

For certain of these sites and facilities, variousVarious uncertainties make it difficult to assessestimate future costs for certain of these environmental-related activities, specifically external legal expenses, VMS’ internal oversight costs, third-party claims and a former VAI facility where the likelihood and scope of further environmental-related activities orare difficult to estimate the future costs of such activities if undertaken.assess. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, it was nonetheless estimated that our share of the future exposure for these environmental-related costs for these sites and facilities ranged in the aggregate from $1.1$1.0 million to $2.7 million (without discounting to present value).$2.6 million. The time frame over which these costs are expected to be incurred varies with each site and facility,type of cost, ranging from one year up to 5approximately 30 years as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009. No amount in the foregoing range of estimated future costs is discounted, and no amount in the range is believed to be more probable of being incurred than any other amount in such range, and werange. We therefore had an accrual of $1.1$1.0 million as of September 28, 2007.

October 2, 2009 for these future environmental-related costs.

As to certain sites and facilities, sufficientSufficient knowledge has been gained to be able to better estimate the scope and certainother costs of future environmental-related activities. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, it was estimated that our share of the future exposurecosts for these environmental-related costs for these sites and facilitiesactivities ranged in the aggregate from $3.1$2.6 million to $13.0 million (without discounting to present value).$12.7 million. The time frame over which these costs are expected to be incurred varies, with each site and facility, ranging from two years up to 22approximately 30 years as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009. As to each of these sites and facilities,ranges of cost estimates, it was determined that a particular amount within the range of certain estimated costs was a better estimate of the future environmental-related cost than any other amount within the range, and thatrange. Together, these amounts totaled $5.5 million at October 2, 2009. Because both the amount and timing of the recurring portion of these future costs were reliably determinable. Together, the undiscounted amounts for these sites totaled $6.0 milliondeterminable, that portion is discounted at September 28, 2007.4%, net of inflation. We therefore had an accrual of $4.2$4.0 million as of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, which represents theour best estimate of our share of these future environmental-related costs discounted at 4%, net of inflation.after discounting estimated recurring future costs. This accrual is in addition to the $1.1$1.0 million described in the preceding paragraph.

 

At September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, our reserve for environmental-related costs, based upon future environmental-related costs estimated by us as of that date, was calculated as follows:

 

  Recurring
Costs
  

Non-

Recurring
Costs

  Total
Anticipated
Future Costs
   Recurring
Costs
  Non-
Recurring
Costs
  Total
Anticipated
Future Cost
 

(in millions)

                

Fiscal Year

            

2008

  $0.3  $0.2  $0.5 

2009

   0.2   0.2   0.4 

2010

   0.2   0.2   0.4   $  0.4  $  0.4  $0.8  

2011

   0.2   0.3   0.5    0.2   0.4   0.6  

2012

   0.2   0.4   0.6    0.3   0.3   0.6  

2013

   0.2   0.2   0.4  

2014

   0.2   0.2   0.4  

Thereafter

   3.8   0.9   4.7    3.2   0.6   3.8  
                    

Total costs

  $  4.9  $  2.2   7.1   $4.5  $2.1   6.6  
                

Less imputed interest

Less imputed interest

   (1.8)

Less imputed interest

   (1.6
            

Reserve amount

Reserve amount

   5.3 

Reserve amount

   5.0  

Less current portion

Less current portion

   (0.5)

Less current portion

   (0.8
            

Long-term (included in Other liabilities)

Long-term (included in Other liabilities)

  $  4.8 

Long-term (included in Other liabilities)

  $4.2  
            

 

The foregoing amounts are only estimates of anticipated future environmental-related costs, and the amounts actually spent in the years indicated may be greater or less than such estimates. The aggregate

range of cost estimates reflects various uncertainties inherent in many environmental investigation, monitoring and remediation activities and the large number of sites where such investigation, monitoring and remediation activities are being undertaken.

 

AnWe have not reduced any environmental-related liability in anticipation of recoveries from third parties. However, an insurance company has agreed to pay a portion of certain of VAI’s (now VMS’) future environmental-related costs, for which we have an indemnification obligation, and we therefore have a long-term receivable of $1.0 million (discounted at 4%, net of inflation) in other assets as of September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 for our share of suchthat insurance recovery. We have not reduced any environmental-related liability in anticipation of recoveries from third parties.

 

Management believes that our reserves for the foregoing and other environmental-related matters are adequate, but as the scope of our obligation becomes more clearly defined, these reserves may be modified and related charges against or credits to earnings may be made. Although any ultimate liability arising from environmental-related matters could result in significant expenditures that, if aggregated and assumed to occur within a single fiscal year, would be material to our financial statements, the likelihood of such occurrence is considered remote. Based on information currently available and our best assessment of the ultimate amount and timing of environmental-related events, management believes that the costs of environmental-related matters are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Governmental Regulations.    Our businesses are subject to many governmental regulations in the U.S. and other countries, including with respect to protection of the environment, employee health and safety, labor matters, product safety, medical devices, import, export, competition and sales to governmental entities. These regulations are complex and change frequently. We incur significant costs to comply with governmental regulations, costs to comply with new or changed regulations could be significant, and failure to comply could result in suspension of or restrictions on our operations, product recalls, fines, other civil and criminal penalties, private party litigation and damage to our reputation, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

In January 2003, the European Union (“EU”) adopted Directive 2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the “WEEE Directive”) and Directive 2002/95/EC on Restriction on the Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the “RoHS Directive”). The WEEE Directive requires EU-member countries to adopt implementing legislation imposing certain responsibilities on producers (manufacturers and importers) in the EU of electrical and electronic equipment with respect to the collection and disposal of waste from that equipment. Certain requirementsequipment and the RoHS Directive bans in the EU the use of the WEEE Directive took effectcertain hazardous materials in August 2005, in particular the requirement that each EU-member country adopt legislation implementing the WEEE Directive in that country.electrical and electronic equipment. All EU-member countries where we manufacture or import products have adopted such implementing legislation (although in some cases to be effective atunder these Directives. As a future date). Weresult of the WEEE Directive, we are incurring (or will incur) waste collection and disposal costs to comply with implementing legislation under the WEEE Directive. TheseDirective; these costs have not been significant to-date and we do not expect them to be significant in the future, but if they are, our financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, similar legislation has been or could be enacted in other countries outside the EU, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2003, the EU also adopted Directive 2002/95/EC on Restriction on the Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the “RoHS Directive”). The RoHS Directive bans in the EU the use of certain hazardous materials in electrical and electronic equipment. The RoHS Directive took effect on July 1, 2006, the date by which each EU-member country was required to adopt legislation implementing the Directive in that country. All EU-member countries where we manufacture or import products have adopted such implementing legislation. As a result of the RoHS Directive, certain raw materials and components sourced from third parties are no longer available, or will in the future become unavailable, for use in the manufacture of the Company’s products. Weproducts; we have not experienced significant supply disruptions and have not incurred significant costs as a result of the RoHS Directive and we do not expect such disruptions or costs to be significant in the future, but if they are, our financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, legislation similar legislation hasto the WEEE and RoHS Directives have been or could be enacted in other countries outside the EU (such as China) and/or the scope of the RoHS Directive could be expanded by the EU or EU-member countries,, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

Item 2. Properties

Item 2.Properties

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we had manufacturing, warehouse, research and development, sales, service and administrative facilities that had an aggregate floor space of approximately 615,000501,000 square feet in the U.S. and 861,000933,000 square feet outside of the U.S., for a total of approximately 1,476,0001,434,000 square feet

worldwide. Of these facilities, aggregate floor space of approximately 586,000588,000 square feet was leased, and we owned the remainder. We believe that our facilities and equipment generally are well maintained, in good operating condition, suitable for our purposes and adequate for current operations. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we entered into an agreement with VMS under which we agreed to surrender to them the sublease for our facility in Palo Alto, California which has a total floor space of 210,000 square feet. As of October 2, 2009, we have surrendered approximately 150,000 square feet of floor space to VMS. We expect to fully vacate this facility by the third quarter of fiscal year 2010.

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we owned or leased 1312 significant manufacturing facilities located throughout the world. Our Scientific Instruments segment had manufacturing facilities in Palo Alto, California; Walnut Creek, California; Lake Forest, California; Ft. Collins, Colorado; Randolph, Massachusetts; Cary, North Carolina; Melbourne, Australia; Grenoble, France; Middleburg,Middelburg, Netherlands; Wroclaw, Poland; Church Stretton, United Kingdom; and Yarnton, United Kingdom. Our Vacuum Technologies segment had manufacturing facilities in Lexington, Massachusetts,Massachusetts; and Turin, Italy. We also owned or leased 5449 sales

and service facilities located throughout the world, 4845 of which were located outside of the U.S., including in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

 

We are involved in pending legal proceedings that are ordinary, routine and incidental to our business. While the ultimate outcome of these and other legal matters is not determinable, we believe that these matters are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

Item 4. SubmissionAt our Special Meeting of MattersStockholders held on October 5, 2009, our stockholders considered and voted on two matters: (1) the proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 26, 2009, among Varian, Agilent and Merger Sub, as it may be amended from time to time, pursuant to which Varian will be acquired by Agilent; and (2) the proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting to a Votelater date or time, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Security HoldersMerger. Our stockholders’ voting on these matters was as follows:

 

None.

   Votes
For
  Votes
Against
  Abstentions

Proposal One—Adoption of Agreement and Plan of Merger

  24,183,831  122,046  29,174

Proposal Two—Adjournment or Postponement of Special Meeting, if Necessary or Appropriate

  22,174,169  2,129,528  31,353

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

(a) Our high and low common stock selling prices in each of the four quarters of fiscal years 20072009 and 20062008 follow:

 

  Fiscal Year 2007 Common Stock Selling Prices  Fiscal Year 2009 Common Stock Selling Prices
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter

High

  $48.38  $59.61  $59.81  $65.39  $  39.42  $  32.74  $  40.65  $  51.85

Low

  $43.51  $44.62  $53.79  $55.64  $  28.38  $  19.93  $  24.28  $  35.71
  Fiscal Year 2006 Common Stock Selling Prices  Fiscal Year 2008 Common Stock Selling Prices
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter

High

  $43.10  $41.56  $45.91  $48.87  $73.89  $67.94  $59.76  $54.42

Low

  $  34.65  $  37.78  $  39.18  $  39.52  $64.21  $50.61  $49.15  $40.75

 

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol VARI.

 

We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not currently anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

There were 2,7432,321 holders of record of our common stock on November 16, 2007.20, 2009.

 

(b) Not applicable.

 

(c)Stock Repurchase Program.Repurchases.    The following table summarizes information relating to stock repurchases duringDuring the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009, the Company repurchased and retired 500 shares tendered to it by employees in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due from those employees upon the vesting of restricted stock.

Fiscal Month

 Shares
Repurchased
 Average Price
Per Share
 Total Value of Shares
Repurchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plan(1)(2)
 Maximum Total Value
of Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plan(1)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

    

Balance – June 29, 2007

    $  67,496

June 30, 2007 – July 27, 2007

  $  — $  67,496

July 28, 2007 – August 24, 2007

 180  59.59  10,721  56,775

August 25, 2007 – September 28, 2007

 107  59.54  6,383 $  50,392
         

Total shares repurchased

 287 $  59.57 $  17,104 
         

(1)In January 2007, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we were authorized to utilize up to $100 million to repurchase shares of our common stock. This new repurchase program is effective until December 31, 2008.
(2)Excludes commissions on repurchases.

Item 6. Selected Financial DataSelected Financial Data

   Fiscal Year Ended
   Oct. 2,
2009
  Oct. 3,
2008
  Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  Sept. 30,
2005(1)

(in millions, except per share amounts)

          

Statement of Earnings Data

          

Sales

  $806.7  $1,012.5  $920.6  $834.7  $772.8

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes

  $59.1  $102.7  $96.8  $74.7  $63.5

Income tax expense

  $20.5  $37.6  $33.2  $24.6  $16.8

Earnings from continuing operations

  $38.6  $65.1  $63.6  $50.1  $46.7

Earnings from discontinued operations(2)

              $79.3

Net earnings

  $38.6  $65.1  $63.6  $50.1  $126.0

Net earnings per basic share:

          

Continuing operations

  $1.34  $2.20  $2.09  $1.62  $1.39

Discontinued operations(2)

               2.35
                    

Net earnings

  $1.34  $2.20  $2.09  $1.62  $3.74
                    

Net earnings per diluted share:

          

Continuing operations

  $1.34  $2.17  $2.05  $1.59  $1.36

Discontinued operations(2)

               2.31
                    

Net earnings

  $1.34  $2.17  $2.05  $1.59  $3.67
                    
   Fiscal Year End
   Oct. 2,
2009
  Oct. 3,
2008
  Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  Sept. 30,
2005

Balance Sheet Data

          

Total assets

  $944.2  $902.0  $936.8  $861.6  $796.0

Long-term debt (excluding current portion)

  $12.5  $18.8  $18.8  $25.0  $27.5

 

  Fiscal Year Ended
  Sept. 28,
2007(1)
 Sept. 29,
2006(1)
 Sept. 30,
2005
 Oct. 1,
2004
 Oct. 3,
2003

(in millions, except per share amounts)

     

Statement of Earnings Data

     

Sales

 $  920.6 $  834.7 $  772.8 $  724.4 $  668.8

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes

 $96.8 $74.7 $63.5 $68.4 $52.8

Income tax expense

 $33.2 $24.6 $16.8 $23.1 $17.8

Earnings from continuing operations

 $63.6 $50.1 $46.7 $45.3 $35.0

Earnings from discontinued operations

 $ $ $79.3 $14.2 $14.1

Net earnings

 $63.6 $50.1 $126.0 $59.5 $49.1

Net earnings per basic share:

     

Continuing operations

 $2.09 $1.62 $1.39 $1.31 $1.03

Discontinued operations

 $ $ $2.35 $0.41 $0.42
               

Net earnings

 $2.09 $1.62 $3.74 $1.72 $1.45
               

Net earnings per diluted share:

     

Continuing operations

 $2.05 $1.59 $1.36 $1.27 $1.00

Discontinued operations

 $ $ $2.31 $0.39 $0.40
               

Net earnings

 $2.05 $1.59 $3.67 $1.66 $1.40
               
  Fiscal Year End
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
 Sept. 30,
2005
 Oct. 1,
2004
 Oct. 3,
2003

Balance Sheet Data

     

Total assets

 $936.8 $861.6 $796.0 $830.7 $737.1

Long-term debt (excluding current portion)

 $18.8 $25.0 $27.5 $30.0 $36.3

(1) The results for fiscal years 2007 and 2006year 2005 do not reflect share-based compensation expense as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on a prospective basis in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Accordingly,whereas the results for prior periodsfiscal years 2006 through 2009 do not reflect such expense.

(2)Until March 11, 2005, we operated an electronics manufacturing business, which was a contract manufacturer of electronic assemblies and subsystems such as printed circuit boards for OEMs. On that date, we sold our Electronics Manufacturing business to Jabil Circuit, Inc. As a result, this business has been treated as a discontinued operation in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Our fiscal years reported are the 52-week52- or 53-week periods that endedend on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2009 was comprised of the 52-week period that ended on October 2, 2009. Fiscal year 2008 was comprised of the 53-week period that ended on October 3, 2008. Fiscal year 2007 was comprised of the 52-week period that ended on September 28, 2007. FiscalWhile fiscal year 20062008 revenue and earnings benefited from the extra week, the benefit was comprisedsubstantially less than a proportionate amount.

On July 26, 2009 we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Agilent (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which we will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the 52-week period that endedconditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, be acquired by Agilent Technologies, Inc. (“Agilent”) for $52.00 per share in cash. At a special meeting held on September 29, 2006. Fiscal year 2005 was comprisedOctober 5, 2009, our stockholders approved the Merger Agreement. The Merger remains subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions. Under the terms of the 52-week periodMerger Agreement, we have agreed to operate our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice, as well as to refrain from taking certain actions in the conduct of our business without Agilent’s prior written consent until the consummation of the Merger. Actions that ended on September 30, 2005.may require Agilent’s consent include, but are not limited to, new indebtedness, capital expenditures, loans and investments, manufacturing and customer agreements, acquisitions, issuance of securities, and the repurchase of shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The discussion below should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements included in Item 15 of this report. In addition, this discussion contains forward-looking statements and should be read together with the risks to our business as described inPart I—Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements andItem 1A—Risk Factors.

 

Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements

During the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009, we identified a clerical error related to the calculation of the fiscal year 2008 income tax provision. The impact of this error was an understatement of income tax expense and an overstatement of consolidated net earnings of $1.3 million during the fiscal quarter and fiscal year ended October 3, 2008. The error also resulted in an overstatement of current deferred tax assets and retained earnings of $1.3 million at October 3, 2008, January 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009. We assessed the materiality of this error and concluded that the previously issued financial statements are not materially misstated. We have corrected the immaterial error by revising the prior period financial statements. Accordingly, the October 3, 2008 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of earnings and of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008 presented herein have been revised to correct for the immaterial error. The revision did not impact net cash provided by operating activities or net cash used in investing activities or financing activities for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008.

Results of Operations

 

Fiscal Year 20072009 Compared to Fiscal Year 20062008

 

Segment Results

 

For financial reporting purposes, our continuing operations are grouped into two reportable business segments: Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies.

The following table presents comparisons of our sales and operating earnings for each of those segments and in total for fiscal years 20072009 and 2006:2008:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended Increase
(Decrease)
 
  September 28,
2007
 September 29,
2006
 Increase
(Decrease)
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 
  $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ %   $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ % 

(dollars in millions)

               

Sales by Segment:

              

Scientific Instruments

  $761.5  82.7% $686.0  82.2% $75.5  11.0%  $675.3   83.7 $838.7   82.8 $(163.4 (19.5)% 

Vacuum Technologies

   159.1  17.3   148.7  17.8   10.4  7.0    131.4   16.3    173.8   17.2    (42.4 (24.4
                          

Total company

  $920.6  100.0% $834.7  100.0% $85.9  10.3%  $806.7   100.0 $1,012.5   100.0 $(205.8 (20.3)% 
                          

Operating Earnings by Segment:

              

Scientific Instruments

  $79.4  10.4% $60.3  8.8% $19.1  31.8%  $53.9   8.0 $80.7   9.6 $(26.8 (33.2)% 

Vacuum Technologies

   32.0  20.1   29.1  19.6   2.9  9.8    25.7   19.5    34.4   19.8    (8.7 (25.4
                          

Total segments

   111.4  12.1   89.4  10.7   22.0  24.7    79.6   9.9    115.1   11.4    (35.5 (30.9

General corporate

   (18.8) (2.1)  (16.6) (2.0)  (2.2) (13.9)   (20.6 (2.5  (13.6 (1.4  (7.0 (51.0
                          

Total company

  $92.6  10.1% $72.8  8.7% $19.8  27.1%  $59.0   7.3 $101.5   10.0 $(42.5 (41.9)% 
                          

 

Scientific Instruments.    The increasedecrease in Scientific Instruments sales was primarily attributable to higherlower sales volume in particular from mass spectrometersof a broad range of products and other analytical instruments. Sales into industrial (which includes environmental, food and energy) applications increased strongly, while sales into life science applications increased modestly. Scientific Instruments revenues for the fiscal year 2006 do not include sales fornegative impact of the full period from PL International Limited (“Polymer Labs”), whichstronger U.S. dollar on reported revenues. The lower volume was acquired in November 2005. Excludingprimarily due to the impact of Polymer Labs, Scientific Instruments salesthe continued global economic weakness on capital equipment spending and to a lesser extent on specific items impacting the comparability of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 with the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. Those items included an extra week in fiscal 2008 and the negative impact of customers’ uncertainty and employee and other disruptions related to the announcement and pendency of the acquisition by Agilent. Sales from businesses acquired in fiscal year 2007 increased2008 positively impacted reported sales by approximately 10.7% compared to fiscal year 2006.less than 1%.

 

Scientific Instruments operating earnings for fiscal year 2007 include2009 included $2.2 million of costs resulting from the pending acquisition by Agilent, acquisition-related intangible amortization of $7.2 million, amortization of $0.1 million related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with the acquisition of Oxford Diffraction Limited (“Oxford Diffraction”) and restructuring and other related costs of $4.3 million, acquisition-related intangible amortization of $7.9 million, share-based compensation expense of $3.4 million and amortization of $1.3 million related to inventory written up in connection with the acquisition of IonSpec Corporation (“IonSpec”) in February 2006.$8.9 million. In comparison, Scientific Instruments operating earnings for fiscal year 2006 include2008 included an acquisition-related in-process research and development charge of $1.7 million, acquisition-related intangible amortization of $8.4 million, amortization of $1.4 million related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with certain acquisitions and restructuring and other related costs of $0.2 million, an in-process research and development charge of $0.8 million relating to the acquisition of Polymer Labs, acquisition-related intangible amortization of $8.3 million, share-based compensation expense of $3.5 million and amortization of $4.3 million related to inventory written up in connection with the acquisitions of Magnex Scientific Limited (“Magnex”) in November 2004, Polymer Labs in November 2005 and IonSpec in February 2006.$5.5 million. Excluding the impact of these items, the increase inScientific Instruments operating earnings decreased as a percentage of sales resulted primarily fromdue to the negative impact of lower sales volume leverage andduring fiscal year 2009, partially offset by the positive impact from efficiency improvements benefiting selling, generalimplemented in recent years, the benefits of cost reduction activities implemented in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 and administrative expenses as well as the transitionstronger U.S. dollar (which was unfavorable to internally sourced magnets for magnet-based products.

reported sales but favorable to reported operating margins).

Vacuum Technologies.    The decrease in Vacuum Technologies sales increased primarily as a result of higherwas driven mainly by lower sales volume of products for both industrial and life science applications.applications, primarily due to the negative impacts of continued global economic weakness on capital equipment spending and the stronger U.S. dollar on reported revenues.

 

Vacuum Technologies operating earnings for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 includeyear 2009 included the impact of share-based compensation expenserestructuring and other related costs of $1.1 million in both periods.$0.8 million. Excluding the impact of these items,costs, the slight increase in Vacuum Technologies operating earnings as a percentage of sales was primarily attributabledue to the positive impact of efficiency improvements implemented in recent years, cost reduction activities implemented during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 and the stronger U.S. dollar, largely offset by the negative impact of lower sales volume leverage on research and development expenses and, to a lesser extent, selling, general and administrative expenses.volume.

Consolidated Results

 

The following table presents comparisons of our sales and other selected consolidated financial results for fiscal years 20072009 and 2006:2008:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended Increase
(Decrease)
 
  

September 28,

2007

 

September 29,

2006

 Increase
(Decrease)
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 
  $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ %   $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ % 

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

               

Sales

  $920.6  100.0% $834.7  100.0% $ 85.9  10.3%  $806.7   100.0 $1,012.5   100.0 $(205.8 (20.3)% 
                          

Gross profit

   415.5  45.1   374.3  44.8   41.2  11.0    354.7   44.0    452.4   44.7    (97.7 (21.6
                          

Operating expenses:

              

Selling, general and administrative

   257.8  28.0   241.0  28.9   16.8  6.9    239.3   29.7    277.4   27.4    (38.1 (13.8

Research and development

   65.2  7.0   59.7  7.1   5.5  9.1    56.4   7.0    71.8   7.1    (15.4 (21.4

Purchased in-process research and development

        0.8  0.1   (0.8) (100)          1.7   0.2    (1.7 (100.0
                          

Total operating expenses

   323.0  35.0   301.5  36.1   21.5  7.1    295.7   36.7    350.9   34.7    (55.2 (15.8
                          

Operating earnings

   92.5  10.1   72.8  8.7   19.7  27.1    59.0   7.3    101.5   10.0    (42.5 (41.9

Impairment of private company equity investment

          (3.0 (0.3  3.0   100.0  

Interest income

   6.2  0.7   4.0  0.5   2.2  53.0    1.6   0.2    5.9   0.6    (4.3 (72.2

Interest expense

   (1.9) (0.2)  (2.2) (0.3)  0.3  (13.6)   (1.5 (0.2  (1.7 (0.2  0.2   10.3  

Income tax expense

   (33.2) (3.7)  (24.5) (2.9)  (8.7) 35.0    (20.5 (2.5  (37.6 (3.7  17.1   45.4  
                          

Net earnings

  $63.6  6.9% $50.1  6.0% $13.5  27.1%  $38.6   4.8 $65.1   6.4 $(26.5 (40.7)% 
                          

Net earnings per diluted share

  $2.05   $1.59   $0.46    $1.34    $2.17    $(0.83 
                          

 

Sales.    As discussed under the headingSegment Results above, sales by theour Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies segments in fiscal year 2007 increased2009 decreased by 11.0%19.5% and 7.0%24.4%, respectively, compared to fiscal year 2006.2008. On a consolidated basis, sales grew 10.3%declined 20.3% in fiscal year 2007, with strong growth into industrial (which includes environmental, food2009. This decrease was primarily related to lower sales volume of a broad range of products and energy) applications and modest growth into life science applications. Revenues for fiscal year 2006 do not include sales for the full twelve months from Polymer Labs, whichnegative impact of the stronger U.S. dollar on reported revenues. The lower volume was acquired in November 2005. Excludingprimarily due to the impact of Polymer Labs,continued global economic weakness on capital equipment spending and to a lesser extent on specific items impacting the comparability of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 with the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. Those items included an extra week in fiscal 2008 and the negative impact of customers’ uncertainty and employee and other disruptions related to the announcement and pendency of the acquisition by Agilent. Reported sales were negatively impacted by the stronger U.S. dollar, which strengthened approximately 6% on a weighted-average basis compared to other currencies in which we sell products and services. Sales from businesses acquired in fiscal year 2007 increased2008 positively impacted reported sales by approximately 10.1% comparedless than 1%.

For geographic reporting purposes, we refer to fiscal year 2006.four regions—North America (excluding Mexico), Europe (including the Middle East and Africa), Asia Pacific (including India) and Latin America (including Mexico).

 

Sales by geographic region in fiscal years 20072009 and 20062008 were as follows:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended Increase
(Decrease)
 
  September 28,
2007
 September 29,
2006
 Increase
(Decrease)
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 
  $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ %   $  % of
Sales
 $  % of
Sales
 $ % 

(dollars in millions)

                   

Sales by Geographic Region:

       

Geographic Region

         

North America

  $312.1  33.9% $325.5  39.0% $(13.4) (4.1)%  $253.8  31.5 $324.8  32.1 $(71.0 (21.9)% 

Europe

   376.8  40.9   309.6  37.1   67.2   21.7    313.5  38.9    409.0  40.4    (95.5 (23.4

Asia Pacific

   185.6  20.2   163.6  19.6   22.0  13.4    194.3  24.0    216.6  21.4    (22.3 (10.3

Latin America

   46.1  5.0   36.0  4.3   10.1  28.1    45.1  5.6    62.1  6.1    (17.0 (27.3
                          

Total company

  $920.6  100.0% $834.7  100.0% $85.9  10.3%  $806.7  100.0 $1,012.5  100.0 $(205.8 (20.3)% 
                          

The increasesSales volume decreased in sales in Europe, Asia Pacificall geographic regions for both Scientific Instruments and Latin America were primarily attributable to stronger demand across a broad range of ourVacuum Technologies products in particular analytical instruments and vacuum products. The weaker U.S. dollar also had a positive effect on the reported sales increases in these regions. In Europe, higher sales of magnet-based products also contributed to the increase.

We believe the reduction in sales in North America was primarily due to a general trend in many industriesthe impact of manufacturing moving outcontinued global economic weakness on capital equipment spending. In addition, reported sales outside North America were unfavorably impacted by the strengthening of the U.S. for cost and tax reasons, which was in part due to consolidations and a shift in pharmaceutical research and manufacturing to the Asia Pacific region. While this trend negatively impacted sales in North America in fiscal year 2007, it probably benefited us in Asia Pacific.

In addition to the factors described above, the sales decrease in North America and increase in Europedollar compared to fiscal year 2006 were both more pronounced, and the sales increase in Asia Pacific was less pronounced, due to the timing of sales of certain low-volume, high-selling price magnet-based products. We do not consider these geographic shifts to be indicative of any particular trend for magnet-based products as a whole, but rather to be reflective of the variability in results that these low-volume, high-selling price magnet-based products can create.2008.

 

Gross Profit.    Gross profit for fiscal year 20072009 reflects the impact of $5.3$6.1 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets, $1.3amortization of $0.1 million in amortization expense related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with the IonSpecOxford Diffraction acquisition share-based compensation expense of $0.4 million and $1.2$4.1 million in restructuring and other related costs. In comparison, gross profit for fiscal year 20062008 reflects the impact of $5.1$6.5 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets, $4.3amortization of $1.4 million in amortization expense related to inventory written up to fair value primarily in connection with the IonSpec, Polymer Labs and Magnexcertain acquisitions and share-based compensation expense of $0.4 million.$1.6 million in restructuring and other related costs. Excluding the impact of these items, gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased slightly. The negative impact of lower sales volume was largely offset by the positive impact of efficiency improvements (such as those resulting from lower-cost manufacturing and outsourcing initiatives, global procurement initiatives, and facility relocations/closures) implemented in recent years, the benefits from cost reduction activities implemented in the second quarter of fiscal year 20072009, and the favorable impact of the stronger U.S. dollar (which was unchanged from fiscal year 2006.favorable to reported gross profit margins but unfavorable to reported sales).

 

Selling, General and Administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 20072009 included $2.6$9.2 million of costs resulting from the pending acquisition by Agilent, $1.1 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets $2.4and $4.8 million in restructuring and other related costs and $8.9 million in share-based compensation expense.costs. In comparison, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 20062008 included $3.3$1.8 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible amortization, $0.2assets and $2.6 million in restructuring and other related costs and $7.7 million in share-based compensation expense.costs. Excluding the impact of these items, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses were lower as a percentage of sales in fiscal year 2007was primarily as a resultdue to the negative impact of lower sales volume, leveragepartially offset by the favorable impact of the stronger U.S. dollar and efficiency improvements resultingcost savings achieved from restructuring activities implemented in recent years (including benefits from cost reduction activities.activities implemented in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009).

 

Research and Development.    Research and development expenses for fiscal year 20072009 reflect the impact of $0.8 million in restructuring and other related costs and $0.5 million in share-based compensation expense.costs. In comparison, research and development expenses for fiscal year 20062008 reflect the impact of share-based compensation expense of $0.5 million.$1.3 million in restructuring and other related costs. Excluding the impact of these items, the decrease in research and development expenses were slightly lower as a percentage of sales was primarily due to sales volume leverage.the favorable impact of the stronger U.S. dollar in fiscal year 2009 and higher costs associated with new product introductions and product transition activities in fiscal year 2008.

Purchased In-Process Research and Development.    In absolute dollars,connection with the increaseOxford Diffraction acquisition in fiscal year 2008, we recorded a one-time charge of $1.7 million to immediately expense acquired in-process research and development expenses resulted primarily fromrelated to projects that were in-process at the acquisitionstime of Polymer Labs in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and IonSpec in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 and higher spending on new product development primarily for information rich detection products.acquisition.

 

Restructuring Activities.    Between fiscal years 2003 and 2007, weWe have committed to several restructuring plans in order to adjust our organizational structure, improve operational efficiencies, centralize functions, reallocate resources and eliminate redundantreduce operating costs.Several of these plans were either initiated or excess costs resulting from acquisitions or dispositionsstill in process during those periods.Wefiscal year 2009. From the respective inception dates of these plans through October 2, 2009, we have incurred a total of $17.6$12.2 million in restructuring expense under these restructuring plans.and a total of $9.9 million in other costs related directly to those plans (comprised primarily of employee retention and relocation costs and accelerated depreciation of assets disposed upon the closure of facilities).

The following table sets forth changes in our aggregate liability relating to all restructuring plans during fiscal year 2007:2009:

 

  Employee-
Related
 Facilities-
Related
 Total   Employee-
Related
 Facilities-
Related
 Total 

(in thousands)

            

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $  233  $  818  $  1,051 

Charges

   2,321      2,321 

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $1,840   $1,044   $2,884  

Charges to (reversals of) expense, net

   6,283    (296  5,987  

Cash payments

   (393)  (127)  (520)   (7,768  (294  (8,062

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   61   16   77    224    (56  168  
                    

Balance at September 28, 2007

  $2,222  $707  $2,929 

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $579   $398   $977  
                    

 

In addition,fiscal year 2009, we have also recorded $3.7 million in other costs related directly to these plans (comprisedcomprised primarily of employee retention and relocation costs and accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities) totaling $5.4 million. Offacilities.

Fiscal Year 2009 Second Quarter Plan.    During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we committed to a plan to reduce our cost structure, primarily through headcount reductions, due to continuing uncertainties in the global economic environment. The plan primarily involved the elimination of approximately 240 regular employees (primarily in North America and Europe and, to a lesser extent, Asia Pacific and Latin America) and 80 temporary positions in both the Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies segments. In addition, the plan included the closure of one small research and development/manufacturing facility in North America (Lake Forest, California) and two sales offices in Europe (Sweden and Switzerland).

The restructuring costs associated with this amount, aplan include one-time termination benefits for employees whose positions were eliminated and lease termination costs on vacated facilities. Other restructuring-related costs include employee retention and relocation costs and facility-related relocation costs and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities. These costs are being recorded and included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses.

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal year 2009 as well as total restructuring expense and other restructuring-related costs recorded since the inception of $2.0the plan:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 
(in thousands)          

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $   $   $  

Charges to expense, net

   6,073    21    6,094  

Cash payments

   (5,892  (12  (5,904

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   197    1    198  
             

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $378   $10   $388  
             

Total expense since inception of plan

    

(in millions)

    

Restructuring expense

  

 $6.1  
    

Other restructuring-related costs

  

 $0.9  
    

The restructuring expense of $6.1 million was recorded during fiscal year 2007.2009 related to employee termination benefits, of which $5.5 million impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and $0.6 million impacted the Vacuum Technologies segment. We also incurred $0.9 million in other restructuring-related costs during the period, which primarily impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and were comprised of $0.6 million in employee-related costs and a $0.3 million non-cash charge for accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities. These costs are expected to be settled by the end of fiscal year 2010.

Fiscal Year 2009 First Quarter Plan.    During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we committed to a separate plan to reduce our employee headcount in order to reduce operating costs and increase margins. The plan involved the termination of approximately 30 employees, mostly located in Europe. The restructuring costs related to this plan primarily consist of one-time termination benefits which are expected to be settled by the end of fiscal year 2010. This restructuring plan did not involve any non-cash components. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan have been included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses.

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal year 2009 as well as total restructuring expense and other restructuring-related costs recorded since the inception of the plan:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 
      

(in thousands)

      

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $  $  —  $  —  

Charges to expense, net

     1,354        1,354  

Cash payments

   (1,309)      (1,309

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   39      39  
             

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $84  $  $84  
             

Total expense since inception of plan

  

(in millions)

  

Restructuring expense

  $1.4  
     

Other restructuring-related costs

  $0.1  
     

The restructuring expense of $1.4 million recorded during fiscal year 2009 related to employee termination benefits of which $1.2 million impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and $0.2 million impacted the Vacuum Technologies segment. We also incurred $0.1 million in other employee-related costs during the period which impacted the Scientific Instruments segment.

 

Fiscal Year 2007 Plan.    During the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, we committed to a plan to combine and optimize the development and assembly of most of our nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) and mass spectrometry products, to further centralize related administration and other functions and to reallocate certain resources toward more rapidly growing product lines and geographies. As part of the plan, we are creatingcreated an information rich detection (“IRD”) center in Walnut Creek, California, where certain NMR operations currentlythat were previously located in Palo Alto, California will bewere integrated with mass spectrometry operations already located in Walnut Creek. Merging our IRD talent base into this single location will capitalize on our strengthWe are investing in NMRa substantial remodel of an existing building and mass spectrometry, and enhance our ability to develop innovative IRD solutions that are more powerful, complementary, routine and user-friendly. Underscoring our commitment to IRD and the benefits that a combined location and organization will provide, we will investinvested in a new 45,000 square foot building and a substantial remodel of an existing building there to house the IRD center.

 

As a result of the plan, a number of employee positions have been or will bewere relocated or eliminated and certain facilities will bewere consolidated. These actions primarily impactimpacted the Scientific Instruments segment and involveinvolved the elimination of between approximately 40 and 60 positions. We expect these activities to be completed during the first half of fiscal year 2009.

 

Restructuring and other related costs associated with this plan include one-time termination benefits, retention and relocation payments, costs to relocate facilities (including decommissioning costs, moving costs and temporary facility/storage costs), accelerated depreciation of fixed assets to be disposed as a result of facilities actions and lease termination costs. These costs are currently estimated to be between $10.5$12.5 million and $14.5$15.0 million, of which $4.3$1.3 million was incurred in fiscal year 20072009 and between $5.0$5.5 million and $9.0 million is expected to be recordedwas incurred in fiscal year 2008. TheseThe estimated remaining costs are expected to be recorded and settled through the secondfourth quarter of fiscal year 20092010 except for certain lease termination-related costs, which might be settled as late as the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan have been included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses.

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal year 2007:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

     

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $  —  $  —  $  — 

Charges

   2,301      2,301 

Cash payments

   (145)     (145)

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   66      66 
             

Balance at September 28, 2007

  $2,222  $  $2,222 
             

The restructuring charges of $2.3 million recorded during fiscal year 2007 related to employee termination benefits. In addition, we incurred $2.0 million in other costs relating directly to this restructuring plan during fiscal year 2007. These costs were comprised of a $0.7 million non-cash charge for accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities as well as $0.8 million in employee retention costs and $0.5 million in other facility-related costs, both of which will be settled in cash. Since the inception of this plan, we have recorded $2.3 million in related restructuring expense and $2.0 million of other related costs.

Upon its completion, thethis plan is expected to result in certain operational improvements and efficiencies, which we anticipate will result in a reduction of our overall cost structure and annual operating expenses. We currently estimate

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal year 2009 as well as total restructuring expense and other restructuring-related costs recorded since the inception of the plan:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 
    

(in thousands)

    

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $1,840   $551   $2,391  

Reversals of expense, net

   (1,144  (317  (1,461

Cash payments

   (567  (220  (787

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   (12  (14  (26
             

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $117   $   $117  
             

Total expense since inception of plan

  

 

(in millions)

  

 

Restructuring expense

  

 $2.9  
    

Other restructuring-related costs

  

 $8.2  
    

The reversals of restructuring expense of $1.5 million recorded during fiscal year 2009 related to changes in estimates relating to certain employee termination benefits and the early cancellation of our lease agreement for a vacated facility. Of the $8.2 million in other restructuring-related costs, we recorded $2.8 million during fiscal year 2009, which were comprised of $1.7 million in employee retention costs and $1.1 million in facilities-related costs including decommissioning costs and a non-cash charge for accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities.

Restructuring Cost Savings.    The following table sets forth the estimated annual cost savings for each plan when they were initiated as well as where those cost savings were expected to be achieved following completion of this plan to be between $3.0 million and $5.0 million per year. realized:

Restructuring Plan

Estimated Annual
Cost Savings

Fiscal Year 2007 Plan (Scientific Instruments—to combine and optimize the development and assembly on certain products and to centralize functions and reallocate resources to rapidly growing product lines)

$3 million - $5 million

Fiscal Year 2009 First Quarter Plan (Scientific Instruments—to reduce headcount and operating costs and increase operating margins)

$2 million - $3 million

Fiscal Year 2009 Second Quarter Plan (Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies—to reduce cost structure due to global economic uncertainties, primarily through headcount reduction)

$20 million - $24 million

These estimated cost savings which are not expected to be realized until the plan is substantially completed in the first half of fiscal year 2009, are expected to impact cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development.development expenses. Some of these cost savings have been and will continue to be reinvested in other parts of our business, for example, as part of our continued emphasis on information rich detectionIRD and consumable products. In addition, unrelated cost increases in other areas of our operations have and could in the future offset some or all of these cost savings. Although it is difficult to quantify with any precision our actual cost savings to date from these activities, many of which are still ongoing, we currently believe that the ultimate savings realized will not differ materially from these estimates.

 

Impairment of Private Company Equity Investment.    During fiscal year 2008, we became aware of information which raised substantial doubt about the ability of a small, private company in which we held a cost-method equity investment to continue as a going concern. Based on this information, we determined that the fair value of our investment had declined and that the decline was other-than-temporary. As a result, we wrote off the entire $3.0 million carrying value via an impairment charge in that period.

Interest Income.    The increasedecrease in interest income was primarily due to higher averagelower interest rates on invested cash balances and higher rates of interest on those balances during fiscal year 20072009 compared to fiscal year 2006.2008.

 

Income Tax Expense.    The effective income tax rate was 34.3%34.7% for fiscal year 2007,2009, compared to 32.9%36.6% for fiscal year 2006.2008. The lower effective income tax rate in fiscal year 20062009 was primarily due to a net reduction of $1.8 million in tax reserves resulting from the positive outcome of tax uncertainties during that period,

lower U.S. state taxes, lower U.S. federal taxes on distributed and undistributed foreign earnings and lower non-deductible compensation expense. These factors were partially offset by the negative impact of a $0.8 million non-deductible in-process research and development charge recorded during the same period.

We currently expect our effective income tax rate to be between 34.5% and 35.5% for the fullin fiscal year 2008.2009 of non-deductible costs associated with our pending acquisition by Agilent.

 

Net Earnings.    Net earnings for fiscal year 20072009 reflect the impactafter-tax impacts of $9.8$9.2 million in share-based compensation expense, $7.9of costs resulting from the pending acquisition by Agilent, $7.2 million in acquisition-related intangible amortization, $4.3amortization of $0.1 million related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with the Oxford Diffraction acquisition and $9.7 million in restructuring and other related costscosts. Net earnings for fiscal year 2008 reflect a non-deductible acquisition-related in-process research and $1.3development charge of $1.7 million and the after-tax impacts of $3.0 million in an impairment of a private company equity investment, $8.4 million in acquisition-related intangible amortization, $1.4 million in amortization related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with recent acquisitions. Net earnings for fiscal year 2006 reflect the impact of $8.7 million in share-based compensation expense, $8.3 million in acquisition-related intangible amortization, $4.3 million in amortization related to inventory written up in connection with recentcertain acquisitions $0.2and $5.5 million in restructuring and other related costs and an in-process research and development charge of $0.8 million.costs. Excluding the after-tax impact of these items, the increasedecrease in net earnings in fiscal year 2007 resulted2009 was primarily from higherattributable to the negative impact of lower sales volumevolume.

Outlook

The diversity of our products, the applications we serve and lower selling, generalour worldwide distribution position us well. However, we continue to operate in difficult global economic conditions. The uncertainty of these conditions, as well as customers’ uncertainty and administrativeemployee and other disruptions related to the announcement and pendency of our acquisition by Agilent, make it difficult for us to project our near-term results of operations. These conditions could further impact our business and have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.In addition, we have incurred and will continue to incur legal and other expenses as a percentagein connection with the pending acquisition by Agilent, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of sales.operations and/or cash flows.

 

Fiscal Year 20062008 Compared to Fiscal Year 20052007

 

Sale of Electronics Manufacturing Business and Discontinued Operations.    During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, we sold the business formerly operated as our Electronics Manufacturing segment to Jabil Circuit, Inc. In connection with the sale, we determined that this business should be accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Consequently, the results of operations of the Electronics Manufacturing business have been excluded from our results from continuing operations for fiscal year 2005 and have instead been presented on a discontinued operations basis. Earnings from discontinued operations are discussed separately below.

Segment Results

 

The following table presents comparisons of our sales and operating earnings for each of our segments and in total for fiscal years 20062008 and 2005:2007:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended Increase
(Decrease)
 
  September 29,
2006
 September 30,
2005
 Increase
(Decrease)
   October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 
  $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ %   $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $  % 

(dollars in millions)

               

Sales by Segment:

               

Scientific Instruments

  $686.0   $632.9   $53.1  8.4%  $838.7   82.8 $761.5   82.7 $77.2  10.1

Vacuum Technologies

   148.7    139.9    8.8  6.3    173.8   17.2    159.1   17.3    14.7  9.3  
                          

Total company

  $834.7   $772.8   $61.9  8.0%  $1,012.5   100.0 $920.6   100.0 $91.9  10.0
                          

Operating Earnings by Segment:

               

Scientific Instruments

  $60.3  8.8% $50.7  8.0% $9.6  18.8%  $80.7   9.6 $79.4   10.4 $1.3  1.5

Vacuum Technologies

   29.1  19.6   25.4  18.2   3.7  14.6    34.4   19.8    32.0   20.1    2.4  7.6  
                          

Total segments

   89.4  10.7   76.1  9.8   13.3  17.4    115.1   11.4    111.4   12.1    3.7  3.3  

General corporate

   (16.6) (2.0)  (15.9) (2.1)  (0.7) (4.4)   (13.6 (1.4  (18.8 (2.1  5.2  27.9  
                          

Total company

  $72.8  8.7% $60.2  7.8% $12.6  20.9%  $101.5   10.0 $92.6   10.1 $8.9  9.6
                          

 

Scientific Instruments.    The increase in Scientific Instruments sales was primarily attributable to higher sales volume across a broad range of magnetic resonance (“MR”) imaging systems, mass spectrometers and otherour analytical instruments for industrial applications and to a lesser extent, life science applications. Sales into the environmental, energy and mining industries were particularly strong in fiscal year 2006. The increase wasconsumable products, partially offset by lower sales of high-field NMR systems.research products. Sales increased for environmental, energy and life science applications. During fiscal year 2008, the U.S. dollar weakened compared to most other foreign currencies in which we sell products and services, which also contributed to the increase in sales. Excluding sales from businesses acquired in fiscal year 2008, Scientific Instruments revenues forsales in the fiscal year 2005 do not include sales from Polymer Labs, which was acquired in November 2005 and generated revenue ofincreased by approximately $24 million during the twelve months ended September 30, 2005.9% compared to fiscal year 2007.

Scientific Instruments operating earnings for fiscal year 2006 reflect2008 include an acquisition-related in-process research and development charge of $0.8$1.7 million, acquisition-related intangible amortization of $8.3$8.4 million, amortization of $1.4 million related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with acquisitions and restructuring and other related costs of $0.2 million (seeRestructuring Activities below) and amortization of $4.3 million related to inventory written up in connection with the acquisitions of Magnex, Polymer Labs and IonSpec. In addition, operating earnings for fiscal year 2006 include the impact of share-based compensation expense of $3.5 million as a result of our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (“SFAS”) 123(R),Share-Based Payment, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006.$5.5 million. In comparison, Scientific Instruments operating earnings for fiscal year 2005 reflect an in-process research and development charge of $0.7 million,2007 include acquisition-related intangible amortization of $6.5$7.9 million, amortization of $1.3 million related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with an acquisition and restructuring and other related costs of $6.5 million and amortization of $4.3 million related to inventory written up in connection with the Magnex acquisition.million. Excluding the impact of these items, the increase in operating earnings were lower as a percentage of sales resulted primarily fromdue to higher transition costs related to the relocation of manufacturing activities for certain products, the weaker U.S. dollar (which was favorable to reported sales but unfavorable to reported operating margins) and higher costs relating to new product introductions. These factors more than offset the positive impact of sales volume leverage and a mix shift toward higher-margin products (including mass spectrometers and MR imaging systems) and away from lower-margin high-field NMR systems.leverage.

 

Vacuum Technologies.    The increase in Vacuum Technologies sales was driven by higher sales volume over a broad range of products particularly turbomolecular pumps, for both life science and industrial applications.services and the positive impact of the weaker U.S. dollar.

 

Vacuum Technologies operating earnings for fiscal year 2006 include the impact of share-based compensation expense of $1.1 million as a result of our adoption of SFAS 123(R) during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Excluding the impact of this amount, the increaseThe decrease in Vacuum Technologies operating earnings as a percentage of sales was primarily attributable tothe result of the weaker U.S. dollar, which was only partially offset by the positive impact of sales volume leverage, increased sales of higher-margin products (particularly turbomolecular pumps), and reduced costs from the consolidation of and process improvements in the segment’s vacuum pump exchange operations, which positively impacted the segment’s operating profit percentage by approximately 50 basis points.

leverage.

Consolidated Results

 

The following table presents comparisons of our sales and other selected consolidated financial results for fiscal years 20062008 and 2005:2007:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended Increase
(Decrease)
 
October 3,
2008
  September 28,
2007
  
  Fiscal Year Ended     
  September 29,
2006
 September 30,
2005
 

Increase

(Decrease)

  $  % of
Sales
  $  % of
Sales
  $  % 
  $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ %   

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

              

Total sales

  $834.7  100.0% $772.8  100.0% $61.9  8.0%

Sales:

  $1,012.5   100.0 $920.6   100.0 $91.9   10.0
                          

Gross profit

   374.3  44.8   336.7  43.6   37.6  11.2    452.4   44.7    415.5   45.1    36.9   8.9  
                          

Operating expenses:

              

Selling, general and administrative

   241.0  28.9   221.8  28.7   19.2  8.7    277.4   27.4    257.8   28.0    19.6   7.7  

Research and development

   59.7  7.1   54.0  7.0   5.7  10.7    71.8   7.1    65.2   7.0    6.6   10.2  

Purchased in-process research and development

   0.8  0.1   0.7  0.1   0.1  8.0    1.7   0.2           1.7   100.0  
                          

Total operating expenses

   301.5  36.1   276.5  35.8   25.0  9.1    350.9   34.7    323.0   35.0    27.9   8.7  
                          

Operating earnings

   72.8  8.7   60.2  7.8   12.6  20.9    101.5   10.0    92.5   10.1    9.0   9.6  

Impairment of private company equity investment

   (3.0 (0.3         (3.0 (100.0

Interest income

   4.0  0.5   5.4  0.7   (1.4) 25.7    5.9   0.6    6.2   0.7    (0.3 (3.6

Interest expense

   (2.2) (0.3)  (2.2) (0.3)        (1.7 (0.2  (1.9 (0.2  0.2   11.8  

Income tax expense

   (24.5) (2.9)  (16.7) (2.2)  (7.8) 46.7    (37.6 (3.7  (33.2 (3.7  (4.4 (13.3
                          

Earnings from continuing operations

  $50.1  6.0% $46.7  6.0% $3.4  7.2%

Net earnings

  $65.1   6.4 $63.6   6.9 $1.5   2.4
                          

Net earnings per diluted share from continuing operations

  $1.59   $1.36   $0.23  

Net earnings per diluted share

  $2.17    $2.05    $0.12   
                          

 

Sales.    As discussed under the headingSegment Results above, sales by the Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies segments in fiscal year 20062008 increased by 8.4%10.1% and 6.3%9.3%, respectively, compared to fiscal year 2005. Revenues2007. The growth in consolidated sales was broad-based, with increases in sales of products for environmental, energy and life science applications. The weaker U.S. dollar and acquisitions also had a positive effect on the reported sales increases. Excluding sales from businesses acquired in fiscal year 2005 do not include sales from Polymer Labs, which was acquired in November 2005 and generated revenue of approximately $24 million during the twelve months ended September 30, 2005. Excluding revenue from Polymer Labs,2008, sales in fiscal year 20062008 increased by approximately 5%9% compared to fiscal year 2005. These higher sales were primarily the result of strong demand for products used in industrial applications.2007.

For geographic reporting purposes, we utilize four regions—North America (excluding Mexico), Europe (including the Middle East and Africa), Asia Pacific (including India) and Latin America (including Mexico).

Sales by geographic region in fiscal years 20062008 and 20052007 were as follows:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended Increase
(Decrease)
 
  September 29,
2006
 September 30,
2005
 Increase
(Decrease)
   October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 
  $ % of
Sales
 $ % of
Sales
 $ %   $  % of
Sales
 $  % of
Sales
 $  % 

(dollars in millions)

                 

Sales by Geographic Region:

       

Sales by Geographic Region

          

North America

  $325.5  39.0% $316.3  40.9% $9.2  2.9%  $324.8  32.1 $312.1  33.9 $12.7  4.1

Europe

   309.6  37.1   288.9  37.4   20.7  7.2    409.0  40.4    376.8  40.9    32.2  8.6  

Asia Pacific

   163.6  19.6   137.0  17.7   26.6  19.5    216.6  21.4    185.6  20.2    31.0  16.7  

Latin America

   36.0  4.3   30.6  4.0   5.4  17.6    62.1  6.1    46.1  5.0    16.0  34.4  
                          

Total company

  $834.7  100.0% $772.8  100.0% $61.9  10.3%  $1,012.5  100.0 $920.6  100.0 $91.9  10.0
                          

 

The increaseincreases in sales into the rest of the world was primarily the result of higher sales of MR imaging systems, mass spectrometersin Europe, Asia Pacific and turbomolecular pumps. Excluding the impact of the Polymer Labs acquisition, sales into North America were attributable to higher sales by both the Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies segments. The sales increase in Latin America was driven by higher Scientific Instruments sales, with Vacuum Technologies sales essentially flat and sales into Europe were approximately 2% higher during fiscal year 2006.

in that region.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit for fiscal year 2006 reflects the impact of $5.12008 includes $6.5 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets, $4.3$1.4 million in amortization expense related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with the Magnex, Polymer Labs and IonSpecrecent acquisitions and share-based compensation expense of $0.4 million.$1.6 million in restructuring and other related costs. In comparison, gross profit for fiscal year 2005 reflects the impact of $3.92007 includes $5.3 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets, and $4.3$1.3 million in amortization expense related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with the Magnex acquisition.an acquisition and $1.2 million in restructuring and other related costs. Excluding the impact of these items, gross profit as a percentage of sales increased primarily as a resultdecreased slightly due to higher transition costs related to the relocation of manufacturing activities for certain products and the weaker U.S. dollar (which was favorable to reported sales volume leverage, a mix shift towards higher margin products including mass spectrometers, MR imaging systems and turbomolecular pumps and away from lower-margin high-field NMR systems. In addition, reduced costs resulting from the consolidation of and process improvements in the pump exchange operations in our Vacuum Technologies segment positively impacted thebut unfavorable to reported gross margin percentage by approximately 10-20 basis points.profit margins).

 

Selling, General and Administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2006 reflect the impact of $3.32008 include $1.8 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets $0.2and $2.6 million in restructuring and other related costs and $7.7 million in share-based compensation expense.costs. In comparison, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2005 reflect the impact of $6.92007 include $2.6 million in amortization expense relating to acquisition-related intangible assets and $2.4 million in restructuring and other related costs, $2.6 million in acquisition-related intangible amortization and a loss of $1.5 million relating to the settlement of a defined benefit pension plan.costs. Excluding the impact of these items, the slight decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses were slightly higher as a percentage of sales as awas primarily the result of higher order-based commissions and transition costs related to recent acquisitions in the Scientific Instruments segment. This was partially offset by sales volume leverage and lower employee bonus accruals, largely offset by the weaker U.S. dollar and higher costs of complying with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which were 0.2% of sales for fiscal year 2006, comparedrelating to 0.7% of sales for fiscal year 2005 (which was our initial year of implementation).new product introductions.

 

Research and Development.    Research and development expenses for fiscal year 2006 reflect2008 include $1.3 million in restructuring and other related costs. In comparison, research and development expenses for fiscal year 2007 include $0.8 million in restructuring and other related costs. Excluding the impact of share-based compensation expense of $0.5 million. Excluding this item,these items, research and development expenses were relatively flat as a percentage of sales betweensales.

Purchased In-Process Research and Development.    In connection with the periods. The increaseOxford Diffraction acquisition in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, we recorded a one-time charge of $1.7 million to immediately expense acquired in-process research and development expensesrelated to projects that were in absolute dollars was primarily due toprocess at the acquisitionstime of Polymer Labs and IonSpec as well as higher spending on new product development for primarily information rich detection products.the acquisition.

 

Restructuring Activities.Activities.    We have committed to several restructuring plans in order to improve operational efficiencies, centralize functions, reallocate resources and reduce operating costs.

The following table sets forth changes in our aggregate liability during fiscal year 2008 relating to all restructuring plans:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

    

Balance at September 28, 2007

  $2,222   $707   $2,929  

Charges to expense, net

   1,291    761    2,052  

Cash payments

   (1,702  (408  (2,110

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   29    (16  13  
             

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $1,840   $1,044   $2,884  
             

During fiscal year 2008, we also recorded $3.4 million in other costs related directly to these plans which were comprised primarily of employee retention and relocation costs and accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities).

 

Fiscal Year 2005 Plans.2007 Plan.    During the firstthird quarter of fiscal year 2005,2007, we undertook certain restructuring actionscommitted to rationalize our Scientific Instruments field support administration ina plan to combine and optimize the United Kingdom following the completiondevelopment and assembly of most of our acquisition of Magnex. These actions were undertakennuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) and mass spectrometry products, to achieve operational efficienciesfurther centralize related administration and eliminate redundant costs resulting from the acquisition which involved the termination of approximately 20 employees, the consolidation ofother functions and to reallocate certain field support administrative functions previously located in our Walton, United Kingdom location to Magnex’s location in Yarnton, United Kingdomresources toward more rapidly growing product lines and the closure of the Walton facility. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan have been included in selling, general and administrative expenses.geographies.

 

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability during fiscal year 2006 in connection with this2008 relating to the foregoing plan:

 

  Employee-
Related
 Facilities-
Related
 Total   Employee-
Related
 Facilities-
Related
 Total 

(in thousands)

        

Balance at September 30, 2005

  $  82  $  1,153  $  1,235 

Charges to expense

   12      12 

Balance at September 28, 2007

  $2,222   $   $2,222  

Charges to expense, net

   1,291    761    2,052  

Cash payments

   (91)  (576)  (667)   (1,702  (252  (1,954

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   (3)  (21)  (24)   29    42    71  
                    

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $  $556  $556 

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $1,840   $551   $2,391  
                    

We incurred $0.2The restructuring charges of $2.1 million in other costs relating directly to this restructuring planrecorded during fiscal year 2006. This amount was comprised of2008 related to employee relocationtermination benefits and retention costs, which were settled in cash. From the inception of this plan through September 29, 2006, we recorded $1.8 million in related restructuring expense and $0.7 million of other related costs.

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, we committed to a separate plan to reorganize, consolidate and eliminate certain activities. This plan was undertaken due to the divestiture of our Electronics Manufacturing Business, the result of which was that we had lower revenues and reduced infrastructure requirements after the divestiture. We determined that this required us to adjust our organization and reduce our cost structure. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan were included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Under this plan, certain administrative functions within our Corporate organization and Scientific Instruments segment were reorganized and consolidated. This involved changes in reporting structures, consolidation of certain activities and the elimination of employee positions. In addition, this plan involved the elimination of employee positions in certain other operations to reduce our cost structure. These activities were completed during fiscal year 2006.

The measures described above resulted in the elimination of a total of approximately 70 employee positions, of which approximately 45 were in North America and approximately 20 were in Europe. The costs associated with this plan consisted of one-time termination benefits and other related costs for employees in the Corporate organization and the Scientific Instruments segment whose positions were eliminated.

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability during fiscal year 2006 in connection with this plan:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

     

Balance at September 30, 2005

  $  844  $  $  844 

Charges to expense

   38      38 

Cash payments

   (681)     (681)

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   2      2 
             

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $203  $  —  $203 
             

From the inception of this plan through September 29, 2006, we recorded $3.5 million in related restructuring expense and $0.4 million of other related costs.

Fiscal Year 2003 Plan.    During fiscal year 2003, we undertook certain restructuring actions to improve efficiency and more closely align employee skill sets and other resources with our evolving product mix as a result of our continued emphasis on NMR, mass spectroscopy and consumable products, with a bias toward life science applications. In addition, actions were undertaken to create a more efficient consumable products operation. These actions primarily impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and involved the termination of approximately 160 employees (principally in sales and marketing, administration, service and manufacturing functions), the closure of three sales offices and the consolidation of three consumable products factories into one in Southern California. Substantially all of these activities were completed during fiscal year 2003 except for the termination of approximately 20 employees, which took place in the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2004 and the Southern California facility consolidation, which was initiated in the third quarter of fiscal year 2003 and was substantially completed in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan have been included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following table sets forth changes in our restructuring liability during fiscal year 2006 in connection with this plan:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

    

Balance at September 30, 2005

  $  76  $  539  $  615 

Reversals

   (47)  (38)  (85)

Cash payments

      (238)  (238)

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   1   (1)   
             

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $30  $262  $292 
             

The non-cash portion of restructuring costs recorded in connection with these restructuring actions was not significant, either in the aggregate or for any single fiscal period. From the inception of this plan through September 29, 2006, we recorded $7.8 million in related restructuring expense and $2.3leased facilities. We also incurred $3.4 million in other related costs.costs during fiscal year 2008, which were comprised of $2.2 million in employee retention costs and $1.2 million in facilities-related costs including decommissioning costs and a non-cash charge for accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities.

 

Interest IncomeImpairment of Private Company Equity Investment..    The decrease in interest income in    During fiscal year 2006 reflects2008, we became aware of information which raised substantial doubt about the impactability of net cash received froma small, private company in which we held a cost-method equity investment to continue as a going concern. Based on this information, we determined that the salefair value of our investment had declined and that the Electronics Manufacturing Business and subsequently used to repurchase stockdecline was other-than-temporary. As a result, we wrote off the entire $3.0 million carrying value via an impairment charge during fiscal year 2005, partially offset by some increase in interest rates on invested cash in fiscal year 2006.2008.

 

Income Tax Expense.    The effective income tax rate was 32.9%36.6% for fiscal year 2006,2008, compared to 26.4%34.3% for fiscal year 2005. These2007. The higher effective income tax rates were impacted byrate in fiscal year 2008 was primarily due to higher U.S. state taxes, higher U.S. federal taxes on distributed and undistributed foreign earnings, higher non-deductible compensation expense and a non-deductible in-process research and development charges of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively. In addition, the effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2005 included two separate discrete, one-time events that resulted in reductions of income tax expense during the period. The first discrete tax item, which resulted from a change in the treatment of foreign tax credits under new U.S. law enacted during the period, reduced income tax expense by approximately $3.0 million. The second discrete item, which resulted from the elimination of withholding tax on certain dividends under a new tax law enacted in Switzerland during the period, reduced income tax expense by approximately $1.8 million. Excluding the impact of these items, the effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2006 was lower than the rate for fiscal year 2005 primarily duecharge related to lower state taxes resulting from favorable tax elections and a larger benefit from the positive outcome of tax uncertainties during fiscal year 2006, whichan acquisition. These factors were partially offset by the benefit from a reduction in unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of certain statutes of limitations in fiscal year 2008 and lower realization oftaxes on retained foreign tax credits during the period.earnings.

 

Net Earnings from Continuing Operations.    Earnings from continuing operationsNet earnings for fiscal year 2006 reflect2008 included a non-deductible in-process research and development charge of $1.7 million and the after-tax impactimpacts of $8.7an impairment of a private company equity

investment of $3.0 million, in share-based compensation expense, $8.3$8.4 million in acquisition-related intangible amortization, $4.3$1.4 million in amortization related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with recent acquisitions an in-process research and development charge of $0.8 million and $0.2$5.5 million in restructuring and other related costs. Earnings from continuing operationsNet earnings for fiscal year 2005 reflect2007 included the after-tax impactimpacts of $6.5$7.9 million in acquisition-related intangible amortization, $4.3$1.3 million in amortization related to inventory written up to fair value in connection with recent acquisitions, an in-process researchthe acquisition of IonSpec and development charge of $0.7$4.3 million in restructuring and other related costs of $6.9 million, a settlement loss of $1.5 million relating to a defined benefit pension plan in Australia and a reduction in income tax expense of $4.8 million relating to discrete, one-time tax events duringcosts. Excluding the period. Excluding theafter-tax impact of these items, the increase in net earnings from continuing operations resultedin fiscal year 2008 was primarily fromattributable to higher sales volume and improved gross profit margins due to(including sales volume leverage on operating expenses), partially offset by higher transition costs related to the relocation of manufacturing activities for certain products and a mix shift toward higher-margin products.higher costs relating to new product introductions.

 

Earnings from Discontinued Operations.     Earnings from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2005 include earnings of $5.4 million (net of tax) generated from the operations of the disposed Electronics Manufacturing business in that period prior to its sale as well as the one-time book gain of $73.9 million (net of tax) on the sale transaction.

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to exercise certain judgments in selecting and applying accounting policies and methods. The following is a summary of what we consider to be our most critical accounting policies—those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments—the effects of those accounting policies applied and the judgments made in their application.

 

Revenue Recognition.    We derive revenues from product sales (including accessory sales) and services. We recognize revenue on product sales and accessory sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the contract price is fixed or determinable, the product or accessory has been delivered, title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Our sales are typically not subject to rights of return and, historically, actual sales returns have not been significant. Product sales that do not involve unique customer acceptance terms or new specifications or technology with customer acceptance provisions, but that do involve installation services, are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements, where the larger of the contractual billing holdback or the fair value of the installation service is deferred when the product is delivered and subsequently recognized when the installation is complete. For certain other product sales that do involve unique customer acceptance terms or new specifications or technology with customer acceptance provisions, all revenue is deferred until all contractually required customer acceptance provisions and product specifications have been satisfied. Revenue related to service contracts is recognized ratably over the term of the contracts. Unearned maintenance and service contract revenue is included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Revenue related to incident-based paid service and training services is recognized when the related services are provided to the customer.

 

In all cases, the fair value of undelivered elements is deferred until those items are delivered to the customer. Sales arrangements involving undelivered elements are primarily confined to the Scientific Instruments segment and involve product accessories, installation services and/or training services that are delivered after the related product has been delivered. Product accessories generally enhance the functionality of the product but are not essential to the functionality of the product. In determining relative fair values for product accessories and training services, we utilize published price list values as the basis for allocating the overall arrangement consideration. List prices are representative of fair value, as stand-alone sales of products, product accessories and training have occurred at list price. The fair value of installation services is calculated by applying standard service billing rates to the estimate of the number of hours to install a specific product based on historical experience. Estimates of installation hours have historically been accurate.

 

In limited cases, product accessories ordered by customers may not have an established list price, as the item may be a new or slightly modified accessory with no prior sales history. In these limited cases, we consider whether a comparable or substitute accessory that provides similar functionality exists for which fair value has been established and then use that comparable or substitute accessory’s list price in estimating the fair value of the undelivered elements. When the fair value of a delivered element has not been established, we use the residual method to allocate revenue if the fair value of all undelivered elements is determinable. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement consideration is allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue. If such conditions do not exist,we are unable to determine the fair value of an undelivered element, all

arrangement revenue is deferred until the undelivered element is delivered; however, such cases are infrequent and arise from a significant technological advance that creates products or product accessories without a suitable comparable or substitute accessory from which to derive fair value.

 

We determine when and how much revenue may be recognized on a particular transaction in a particular period based on our best estimates of the fair value of undelivered elements and our judgment of when our performance obligations have been met as outlined above. These judgments and estimates impact reported revenues.

 

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Receivable.    We sell our products and extend trade credit to a large number of customers. These customers are dispersed across many different industries and geographies and, historically, no single customer has accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues or trade accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require collateral from them. Although bad debt write-offs have historically been insignificant, allowancesAllowances are established for amounts that are considered to be uncollectible. These allowances represent our best

estimates and are based on our judgment after considering a number of factors including third-party credit reports, actual payment history, customer-specific financial information and broader market and economic trends and conditions. In the event that actual uncollectible amounts differ from these best estimates, changes in allowances for doubtful accounts might become necessary.

 

Inventory Valuation.    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being computed on an average-cost basis. Provisions are made to write down potentially excess, obsolete or slow-moving inventories to their net realizable value. These provisions are based on our best estimates after considering historical demand, projected future demand (including current backlog), inventory purchase commitments, industry and market trends and conditions and other factors. In the event that actual excess, obsolete or slow-moving inventories differ from these best estimates, increases to inventory reserves might become necessary.

 

Product Warranty.    Our products are generally subject to warranties and liabilities are therefore established for the estimated future costs of repair or replacement through charges to cost of sales at the time the related sale is recognized. These liabilities are adjusted based on our best estimates of future warranty costs after considering historical and projected product failure rates and product repair costs. In the event that actual experience differs from these best estimates, changes in our warranty liabilities might become necessary.

 

Environmental Liabilities.    As discussed more fully inItem 1—Business andItem 1ARisk Factors—Environmental Matters, we entered into a Distribution Agreement in connection with becoming a separate, public company on April 2, 1999. Under the terms of that Distribution Agreement, we are obligated to indemnify Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“VMS”) for one-third of certain environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds and tax benefits recognized or realized by VMS for such costs). The liabilities recorded by us relating to these matters are based on our best estimates after considering currently available information regarding the cost and timing of remediation efforts, related legal matters, insurance recoveries and other environmental-related events. As additional information becomes available, these amounts are adjusted accordingly. Should the cost or timing of remediation efforts, legal matters, insurance recoveries or other environmental-related events (including any which may be currently unidentified) differ from our current expectations and best estimates, changes to our reserves for environmental matters might become necessary.

 

Share-based Compensation.    We adopted SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. SFAS 123(R) requires the measurementmeasure and recognition ofrecognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards including employee stock options and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan based on estimated fair values. Under SFAS 123(R), weWe estimate the value of share-based payments on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model, which was also used previously for the purpose of providing pro forma financial information as required under SFAS 123.model. The determination of the fair value of, and the timing of expense relating to, share-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of variables including the expected term of awards, expected stock price volatility and expected forfeitures.

Prior to

In determining the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, we used historicalCompany’s expected stock price volatility in preparing our pro forma information under SFAS 123. Under SFAS 123(R),assumption, we usereview both the historical and implied volatility of the Company’s common stock, with implied volatility based on publicly traded options on the Company’s common stock. We determine the expected stock price volatility assumptions using a combination of historical and implied volatility unless the volume or maturity of these publicly traded options does not satisfy the conditions to establish the expected volatility assumption based upon our assessment that such information is more reflective of current market conditions and a better indicator of expected futureuse implied volatility. SFAS 123(R) also requires forfeitures to beForfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We estimate expected forfeitures, as well as the expected term of awards, based on historical experience. Future changes in these assumptions, our stock price or certain other factors could result in changes in our share-based compensation expense in future periods.

 

Income Taxes.    We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous jurisdictions outside of the U.S. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes as well as in assessing the realizability of our deferred tax expense.assets. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We establish liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, as well as reserves for tax-related uncertaintiesrelated potential penalties and interest, based on the technical merits of our best estimates of whethertax positions and the extent to which additional taxes, penalties and interest will be due. These reservesunrecognized tax benefits are established

when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions are likely tocan be challenged and may not be sustained on review by tax authorities. These reservesbalances are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances. Our income tax expense includes the impact of reserve provisions andnew unrecognized tax benefits recorded as well as changes to reservesexisting unrecognized tax benefits that are considered appropriate. Should the ultimate resolution of any tax-related uncertainties (including any which may be currently unidentified) differ from those we used to determine our current expectations,recorded liabilities, charges against or credits to our unrecognized tax benefits and/or income tax provision will become necessary.

Our judgments regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets are based on, among other things, the relative weight of both positive and negative evidence regarding future taxable income, and may change due to changes in market conditions, tax laws, tax planning strategies or other factors. Should our assumptions and consequently our estimates in this area change in the future, the amount of valuation allowances recorded relating to our deferred tax assets may be increased or decreased, which would result in charges against or credits to our income tax reserves and expense will become necessary.provision.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We generated $99.9$112.9 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal year 2007,2009, compared to $79.3$79.0 million generated in fiscal year 2006.2008. The increase in operating cash from operating activities was primarily driven by higher net earnings in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. The increase was also attributable to a relative increase of $1.9 million in cash from changes in assets and liabilities (excluding the effect of acquisitions).

The relative increase in cash from changes in assets and liabilitiesflows was primarily due to relative increases in cash fromthe favorable impact of decreased accounts receivable ($14.5 million), inventories ($7.7 million) and other liabilities ($13.8 million).inventory balances, partially offset by decreased net earnings after adjustments for non-cash income and expenses and decreased inventory-related liabilities. The relative increase fromdecrease in accounts receivable was primarily duerelated to improvedthe timing of collections in fiscal year 2007. The relative increase from inventories wasand lower sales. Inventory balances have declined primarily due to a greater increase in inventories in the prior year as a result of our transitionreduced inventory purchases to internally sourced magnets for our magnet-based products and the timing of new product launches. The relative increase from other liabilities was primarily due to an increase in our long-term liabilities relating to certain defined benefit postretirement plans. The increase in cash flows from operations attributable to the foregoing factors was partially offset by relative decreases in accounts payable ($14.7 million), accrued liabilities ($7.5 million) and prepaid expenses and otheralign with current assets ($5.6 million) during fiscal year 2007. The relative decrease from accounts payable was primarily due to a reduction in payables relating to OEM magnets for our magnet-based products due to our transition to internally sourced magnets, which was substantially completed in the first half of fiscal year 2007, and the timing of other vendor payments. The relative decrease from accrued liabilities was due to the higher conversion of customer advances on magnet-based products during fiscal year 2007. The relative decrease from prepaid expenses and other current assets was primarily attributable to a reduction in deposits made for OEM magnets for our magnet-based products, also as a result of our transition to internally sourced magnets.revenue levels.

 

We used $24.5$21.1 million of cash for investing activities in fiscal year 2007, compared2009, which compares to $93.0$77.4 million used for investing activities in fiscal year 2006.2008. The decrease in cash used for investing activities in fiscal year 2007 was primarily the result of lower acquisition-related payments. Duringpayments, and cash received for the surrender of a building sublease in fiscal year 2007,2009. In October 2008, we entered into an agreement with VMS under which we agreed to surrender to them the sublease for our facility in Palo Alto, California in exchange for $21.0 million in cash payments. We received a $5.0 million non-refundable first surrender payment under this agreement in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 and will receive the remaining $16.0 million when we fully surrender the facility in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. In fiscal year 2008, the higher cash used for acquisition-related payments totaled $7.1 million and consisted primarily of amounts previously retained to secure sellers’ indemnification obligations and contingentcash consideration payments related to acquisitions made in prior periods. During fiscal year 2006, acquisition-related payments totaled $72.9 million and included $44.3 million and $17.2 million for the acquisitionsacquisition of Polymer Labscertain net assets of Analogix, Inc. (the “Analogix Business”) in November 2007 and IonSpec, respectively, and $11.4 million for contingent consideration payments relating to acquisitions madeof Oxford Diffraction in prior years.April 2008.

 

We used $48.9generated $0.6 million of cash forfrom financing activities in fiscal year 2007, compared2009, which compares to $24.4$94.6 million used for financing activities in fiscal year 2006. The increase in cash2008. Cash used for financing activities was primarily due to higher expenditures to repurchase and retire common stock was significantly lower in fiscal year 2009 (such expenditures were made in both periods as a result

of a continuedan effort to utilize excess cash to reduce the number of outstanding common shares). Cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock were lower in fiscal year 2009 due to lower stock option exercise volume.

 

We maintain relationships with banks in many countries from whom we sometimes obtain bank guarantees and short-term standby letters of credit. These guarantees and letters of credit relate primarily to advance payments and deposits made to our subsidiaries by customers for which separate liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements.balance sheet. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, a total of $13.9$14.5 million of these bank guarantees and letters of credit were outstanding. No amounts had been drawn by beneficiaries under these or any other outstanding guarantees or letters of credit as of that date.

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we had a $25.0an $18.8 million term loan outstanding with a U.S. financial institution compared to $27.5 million at September 29, 2006. As of September 28, 2007, thea fixed interest

rate on the term loan wasof 6.7%. As of September 29, 2006, fixed interest rates on the term loan ranged from 6.7% to 7.2% with a weighted average of 6.8%. The term loan contains certain covenants that limit future borrowings and the payment of cash dividends and require the maintenance of certain levels of working capital and operating results. We were in compliance with all restrictive covenants of the term loan agreement at September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009.

 

In connection with the IonSpecAnalogix Business acquisition, we have accrued but not yet paid a portion of the purchase price that has been retained to secure the sellers’ indemnification obligations. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we had retained amounts for the IonSpec acquisition totaled $0.7an aggregate of $1.3 million, which is due to be paidwill become payable (net of any indemnification claims) in February 2008.during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.

 

As of September 28, 2007, up to a maximum of $37.2 million could be payable through FebruaryOctober 2, 2009, underwe had outstanding contingent consideration arrangements relating to acquired businesses. Amounts subject to these arrangements can be earned over the respective measurement period, depending on the performance of the acquired business relative to certain financial and operational targets.

 

The following table summarizes key terms of outstanding contingent consideration arrangements as of September 28, 2007:October 2, 2009:

 

Acquired businessCompany/Business

  Remaining
amountAmount
availableAvailable
(maximum)
 

Measurement period
Period

  Measurement period end datePeriod End Date
(in millions

IonSpecOxford Diffraction Limited

  $  7.014.0 million 3 years  February 2009April 2011

MagnexAnalogix Business

  $2.84.0 million 3 years  November 2007December 2010

Polymer LabsOther

0.32 yearsJuly 2010

Total

  $19.2 million10.1  3 years  November 2008

 

We also have an outstanding contingent consideration arrangement related to the purchase of certain assets. Remaining maximum contingent amounts under this arrangement were $2.6 million as of October 2, 2009.

The Distribution Agreement provides that we are responsible for certain litigation to which VAI was a party, and further provides that we will indemnify VMS and VSEA for one-third of the costs, expenses and other liabilities relating to certain discontinued, former and corporate operations of VAI, including certain environmental liabilities (see underItem 1A—Risk Factors—Environmental Matters and—Governmental Regulations)Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

We had no material cancelable or non-cancelable commitments for capital expenditures as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009. In the aggregate, we currently anticipate that our capital expenditures will be about 3.5%approximately 2.0% to 3.0% of sales infor fiscal year 2008.2010.

 

In November 2005,February 2008, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we were authorized to utilize up to $100 million to repurchase shares of our common stock. This repurchase program was effective until September 30, 2007. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we repurchased and retired 820,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $37.1 million, which completed this repurchase program.

In January 2007, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program under which we are authorized to utilize up to $100 million to repurchase shares of our common stock. This repurchase program is effective untilthrough December 31, 2008. During fiscal year 2007, we repurchased and retired 862,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $49.6 million.2009. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we had remaining authorization to repurchase $50.4$37.5 million of our common stock under this repurchase program. However, under the terms of the Merger Agreement with Agilent, the Company is generally prohibited from repurchasing any shares of its common stock without the prior consent of Agilent.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to operate our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice, as well as to refrain from taking certain actions in the conduct of our business without Agilent’s prior written consent until the consummation of the acquisition. Actions that may require Agilent’s consent include, but are not limited to, new indebtedness, capital expenditures, loans and investments, manufacturing and customer agreements, acquisitions, issuance of securities, and the repurchase of shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Our liquidity is affected by many other factors, some based on theincluding normal ongoingon-going operations of our business, the businesspending acquisition by Agilent and others relatedexternal economic conditions. Our liquidity has not been materially affected by the deterioration in the global financial markets or global economic conditions in general. However, this deterioration could adversely impact the availability of credit to the uncertainties of the industryus as well as to our customers and suppliers.

We have no material exposure to market risk for changes in whichinterest rates or investment valuations. Our outstanding debt carries a fixed interest rate, and we competeinvest our excess cash primarily in depository accounts and money market funds at various financial institutions. While we have not historically needed to borrow to support working capital or capital expenditure requirements, there is no assurance that we might not need to borrow to support these requirements given global economies. Although our cash requirements will fluctuate based on the timingeconomic conditions and extent of these factors, wewhether such financing would be available.

We nonetheless believe that cash generated from operations, together with our current cash balance and cash equivalents balances and current borrowing capability, will be sufficient to satisfy commitments for capital expenditures and otherour cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.

There can be no assurance, however, that our business will continue to generate cash flows at current levels or that credit will be available to us if and when needed. Future operating performance and our ability to obtain credit will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, including the affect of the pendency of the acquisition by Agilent.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

 

The following table summarizes the amount and estimated timing of future cash expenditures relating to principal and interest payments on outstanding long-term debt, minimum rentals due for certain facilities and other leased assets under long-term, non-cancelable operating leases and other long-term liabilities as of September 28, 2007:October 2, 2009:

 

  Fiscal Years  
  2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Thereafter Total

(in thousands)

       

Operating leases

 $8,536 $6,103 $4,018 $2,249 $1,901 $5,613 $28,420

Long-term debt
(including current portion)

  6,250    6,250    6,250  6,250  25,000

Other long-term liabilities

  1,334  4,849  3,499  3,629  3,464  27,583  44,358
                     

Total

 $16,120 $10,952 $13,767 $5,878 $11,615 $39,446 $97,778
                     

In addition to the non-cancelable contractual obligations included in the above table, we had cancelable commitments to purchase certain superconducting magnets intended for use with NMR systems totaling approximately $3.2 million, net of deposits paid, as of September 28, 2007. Subsequent to that date, these commitments were canceled.

  Fiscal Years   
  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  Thereafter  Total

(in thousands)

             

Operating leases

 $6,817  $5,097  $2,958  $2,247  $1,713  $2,052  $20,884

Long-term debt
(including current portion)

  6,250      6,250      6,250      18,750

Interest on long-term debt

  1,152   838   733   419   314      3,456

Other long-term liabilities

     5,115   3,121   2,612   2,582   27,825   41,255
                           

Total

 $14,219  $11,050  $13,062  $5,278  $10,859  $29,877  $84,345
                           

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet commercial commitments that could result in a significant cash outflow upon the occurrence of some contingent event, except for contingent payments of up to a maximum of $37.2$10.1 million related to acquisitions and $2.6 million related to the purchase of certain assets as discussed underLiquidity and Capital Resources above, the specific amounts of which are not currently determinable.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which addresses accounting for, and disclosure of, uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the requirements of FIN 48 and are not yet able to determine whether its adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. (“SAB”) 108,Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 requires companies to evaluate the materiality of identified unadjusted errors on each financial statement and related disclosures using both the rollover and the iron curtain approach. The rollover approach quantifies misstatements based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement. The iron curtain approach quantifies misstatements based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, irrespective of the misstatement’s year of origin. Adjustment of financial statements would be required if either approach resulted in a material misstatement. SAB 108 applies to annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. Our adoption of SAB 108 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.Standards

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, new accounting standards for fair value measurementsFair Value Measurements,. SFAS 157 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 appliesIn February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of the new accounting standard for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to previous accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.2008, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a

recurring basis (at least annually). We adopted the new accounting standard for fair value measurements effective October 4, 2008 with the exception of the application of the accounting standard to nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities (see Note 3). We do not expect the adoption in the first quarter of SFAS 157fiscal year 2010 of the provisions deferred to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In FebruaryDecember 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159,The Fair Value Optionrevised the accounting standards for Financial Assetsbusiness combinations, which retains the fundamental requirements of the original pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all business combinations but also provides revised guidance for recognizing and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement 115, which provides companies with an option to measure eligible financialmeasuring identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in their entiretythe acquiree. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value. The fair value, option may be applied instrument by instrument, and may be applied onlythe expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred.It also requires that certain tax contingencies and adjustments to entire instruments. If a company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in the item’s fair valuevaluation allowances related to business combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, must be reported as unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159adjusted to income tax expense, regardless of the date of the original business combination. This revised accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2007.2008. We are evaluatingdo not expect our adoption in the options provided under SFAS 159 and their potentialfirst quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on our financial condition andor results of operations. However, in the event that we complete acquisitions subsequent to our adoption of the new guidance, the application of its provisions will likely have a material impact on our results of operations, although we are not currently able to estimate the impact.

In April 2009, the FASB issued a new standard for business combinations that amends the accounting prescribed for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. This accounting standard requires pre-acquisition contingencies to be recognized at fair value if implemented.fair value can be reasonably determined during the measurement period. If fair value cannot be reasonably determined, the accounting standard requires measurement based on the recognition and measurement criteria for contingencies. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not expect our adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. However, in the event that we complete acquisitions subsequent to our adoption, the application of its provisions will likely have a material impact on our results of operations, although we are not currently able to estimate the impact.

In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements, which requires that ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income be clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires once a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. Sufficient disclosures are required to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. All other requirements are applied prospectively. We do not expect the adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for the determination of the useful life of intangible assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The intent of this new accounting standard is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under the accounting guidance for intangible assets and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under the accounting guidance for business combinations. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. Given that this applies to intangible assets acquired after the effective date, we do not expect our adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for determining whether instruments granted in share-based transactions are participating securities. This new accounting standard states that

unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method described in the guidance for earnings per share. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years, on a retrospective basis. We do not expect the adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on our earnings per share.

In December 2008, the FASB issued additional disclosure requirements for plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The required disclosures include a description of the Company’s investment policies and strategies, the fair value of each major category of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets and the significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. These additional disclosures are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of the new disclosure requirements in fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2009, the FASB issued two new accounting standards that provide guidance for revenue recognition. The first standard revises guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This accounting standard replaces the term fair value in the revenue recognition allocation guidance with selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price of each deliverable will first be based on vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available, second on third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available and third on estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE are available. In addition, the residual method is no longer permitted as vendors are now required to allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The second new accounting standard excludes from the scope of software revenue recognition, software components contained in, and essential to the functionality of, tangible products. These new accounting standards require expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures and are effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of these accounting standards in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.    We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. From time to time, we also enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on forecasted transactions. The success of our hedging activities depends on our ability to forecast balance sheet exposures and transaction activity in various foreign currencies. To the extent that these forecasts are overstated or understated during periods of currency volatility, we could experience unanticipated currency gains or losses. However, we believe that in most cases any such gains or losses would be substantially offset by losses or gains from the related foreign exchange forward contracts. We therefore believe that the direct effect of an immediate 10% change in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and all other currencies is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

At September 28, 2007, thereDuring the fiscal year ended October 2, 2009, we were no outstandingnot party to any foreign exchange forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions. During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007, no foreign exchange gains or losses from cash flow hedge ineffectiveness were recognized.

Our foreign exchange forward contracts generally range fromdo not extend beyond one to 12 monthsmonth in original maturity. A summary of all foreign exchange forward contracts that were outstanding as of September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 follows:

 

  Notional
Value
Sold
  Notional
Value
Purchased
  Notional
Value

Sold
  Notional
Value
Purchased

(in thousands)

          

Australian dollar

  $        —  $  47,488

British pound

    13,106

Japanese yen

  3,583  

Euro

  $  $97,956  3,073  

Australian dollar

      37,100

Japanese yen

   4,148   

Canadian dollar

   3,596     2,645  

British pound

      2,102

Danish krone

   1,180   

Korean won

  1,486  

Singapore dollar

  834  
            

Total

  $  8,924  $  137,158  $  11,621  $  60,594
            

 

Interest Rate Risk.    We have no material exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates. We invest any excess cash primarily in short-term U.S. Treasury securitiesdepository accounts and money market funds, and changes in interest rates would not be material to our financial condition or results of operations. We enter into debt obligations principally to support general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements, capital expenditures and acquisitions. At September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, our debt obligations had fixed interest rates.

 

Based upon rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities, the carrying amountamounts of long-term debt approximates theapproximate their estimated fair value.

Although payments under certain of our operating leases for our facilities are tied to market indices, we are not exposed to material interest rate risk associated with our operating leases.

Debt Obligations.

 

Principal Amounts and Related Weighted-Average Interest Rates By Year of Maturity

 

  Fiscal Years     Fiscal Years   
  2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Thereafter Total   2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Thereafter Total 

(dollars in thousands)

        
(in thousands)                

Long-term debt
(including current portion)

  $  6,250  $  —  $  6,250  $  —  $  6,250  $  6,250  $  25,000   $  6,250   $  —   $  6,250   $  —   $  6,250   $  —   $  18,750  

Average interest rate

   6.7%  %  6.7%  %  6.7%  6.7%  6.7%   6.7    6.7    6.7    6.7

 

Defined Benefit Retirement Plans.    Most of our retirement plans, including all U.S.-based plans, are defined contribution plans. However, we also provide defined benefit pension plans in certain countries outside of the U.S. Our obligations under these defined benefit plans will ultimately be settled in the future and are therefore subject to estimation. Defined benefit pension accounting under SFAS 87,Employers’FASB Accounting for PensionsStandard Codification (“ASC”) 715-30,Defined Benefit Plans-Pension,, as amended, is intended to reflect the recognition of future benefit costs over the employees’ estimated service periods based on the terms of the pension plans and the investment and funding decisions made by us.

 

For our defined benefit pension plans, we make assumptions regarding several variables including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate in order to determine defined benefit pension plan expense for the year. This expense is referred to as “net periodic pension cost.” We assess the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and discount rate assumption for each defined benefit plan based on relevant market conditions as prescribed by SFAS 87 and make adjustments to the assumptions as appropriate. On an annual basis, we analyze the rates of return on plan assets and discount rates used and determine that these rates are reasonable. For rates of return, this analysis is based on a review of the nature of the underlying assets, the allocation of those assets and their historical performance and expectations relative to the overallrelevant markets in the countries where the related plans are effective. Historically, our assumed asset allocations have not varied significantly from the actual allocations. Discount rates are based on the prevailing market long-termlong-

term interest rates in the countries where the related plans are effective. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, the estimated long-term rate of return on our defined benefit pension plan assets ranged from 0.5%0.3% to 7.1%6.5% (weighted-average of 5.9%5.1%), and the assumed discount rate for our defined benefit pension plan obligations ranged from 2.0%1.8% to 5.7%5.6% (weighted-average of 5.5%5.4%).

 

If any of these assumptions were to change, our net periodic pension cost would also change. We incurred net periodic pension cost relating to our defined benefit pension plans of $1.4 million in fiscal year 2009, $1.5 million in fiscal year 2008 and $2.3 million in fiscal year 2007, $2.3 million in fiscal year 2006 and $1.6 million in fiscal year 2005 (excluding a settlement loss), and expect our net periodic pension cost to be approximately $1.7$1.2 million in fiscal year 2008.2010. A one percent100 basis point decrease in the weighted-average estimated return on plan assets or assumed discount rate would increase our net periodic pension cost for fiscal year 20082010 by $1.1$0.4 million or $0.4$0.5 million, respectively. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, our projected benefit obligation relating to defined benefit pension plans was $53.3$50.6 million. A one percent100 basis point decrease in the weighted-average estimated discount rate would increase this obligation by $11.0$10.3 million.

During fiscal year 2009, the Company ceased future benefit accruals to a defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. In connection with this action, the Company recorded a curtailment loss of $0.1 million during fiscal year 2009.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The response toinformation required by this Item is submitted as a separate section to this Report. SeeItem 15—Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure controls and procedures.    Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as

amended (the “Exchange Act”)) required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (September 28, 2007)(October 2, 2009), our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.    The Company’sOur management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, doesdo not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision- making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons or by collusion of two or more people. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting.    Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 based on the framework defined inInternal Control—Control – Integrated

Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009.

 

Attestation report of independent registered public accounting firm.    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, as stated in their attestation report included on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.    During the fourth fiscal quarter, we implemented SAP software (for accounting and enterprise management purposes) at one of our locations in the United Kingdom. Except for the aforementioned change, thereThere was no other change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Item 9B.Other Information

 

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The information required by this Item with respect to our executive officers is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information contained in Item 1 of Part I of this Report under the headingExecutive Officers.

 

The information required by this Item with respect to our directors and nominees for director is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingProposal One—Election of Directors in our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

 

The information required by this Item with respect to our audit committee financial expert is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingMeetings and Committees of the Board—Audit Committee in our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

 

The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingSection 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Stock Committee of our Board of Directors are available at our main Internet website, at http://www.varianinc.com, and can be accessed by clicking on “Investors” and then on “Corporate Governance”. Upon request, we will provide to any person, at no charge, a copy of any of these materials. Such a request must be made in writing to our Secretary at Varian, Inc., 3120 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304.94304-1030.

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. This code of ethics, which is included in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees, is posted on our website. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be found as follows:

 

 1. From our main website, click on “Investors.”

 

 2. Next, click on “Corporate Governance.”

 

 3. Finally, click on “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

 

We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K, regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics with respect to directors and executive officers, by posting such information on our website, at the address and location specified above.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 11.Executive Compensation

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingsExecutive Compensation Information andCompensation Committee Report in our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingheadingsEquity Compensation Plan InformationandStock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners—Equity Compensation Plan Information and Proposal Three—Approval of Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock PlanOwnersin our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingsBoard Structure and Nominees andRelated Party Transactions in our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The information required by this Item with respect to our principal accounting firm is incorporated herein by reference from the corresponding information provided under the headingProposal Two—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmin our Proxy Statement.Statement (or, if our Proxy Statement is not filed with the SEC on or prior to January 30, 2010, will be set forth in an amendment to this Report to be filed on or prior to January 30, 2010).

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

 (a) (1)  Consolidated Financial Statements: (see Index on page F-1 of this Report)

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Consolidated Statement of Earnings for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet at fiscal year end 20072009 and 20062008

 

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 (2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule: (see Index on page F-1 of this Report)

 

The following Financial Statement Schedule for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 is filed as a part of this Report and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Schedule

   

II

  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

 

All other required schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is given in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.

 

 (3) Exhibits

 

      Incorporated by Reference   
Exhibit
No.
  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
  2.1  Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement, dated as of January 14, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  2.1  
  3.1  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  3.1, 3.2  
  3.2  By-Laws of Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  3.3  
  4.1  Specimen Common Stock Certificate.  10/A  March 8, 1999  4.1  
  4.2  Rights Agreement, dated as of February 18, 1999, between Varian, Inc. and First Chicago Trust Company of New York.  10/A  March 8, 1999  4.2  
  4.3  First Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2001, between Varian, Inc. and First Chicago Trust Company of New York.  8-A/A  November 21, 2001  2  
  4.4  Second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2004, between Varian, Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.  10-Q  May 17, 2004  4.4  
      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith

  2.1

  Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement, dated as of January 14, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  2.1  

  2.2

  Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 26, 2009, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., Varian, Inc. and Cobalt Acquisition Corp.  8-K  July 27, 2009  2.1  

  3.1

  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  3.1, 3.2  

  3.2

  Amended and Restated By-Laws of Varian, Inc.  8-K  February 9, 2009  3.1  

  4.1

  Specimen Common Stock Certificate.  10-Q  May 12, 2009  4.1  

10.1

  Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of April 2, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.2  

10.2

  Varian, Inc. Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement and Assumption dated as of April 2, 1999.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.6  

      Incorporated by Reference   
Exhibit
No.
  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
10.1  Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of April 2, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.2  
10.2  Varian, Inc. Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement and Assumption dated as of April 2, 1999.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.6  
10.3  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2005, between Varian, Inc. and Jabil Circuit, Inc.  8-K  March 17, 2005  2.1  
10.4  Form of Indemnity Agreement between Varian, Inc. and its Directors and Officers.  10-K  December 9, 2004  10.5  
10.5*  Varian, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of December 2, 2004.  10-Q  February 8, 2005  10.6  
10.6*  Varian, Inc. Management Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.9  
10.7*  Varian, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.10  
10.8*  Varian, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  10-Q  May 10, 2000  10.1  
10.9*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning April 2, 1999 and prior to November 10, 2003).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.9  
10.10*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 10, 2003 and prior to November 11, 2004).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.10  
10.11*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 11, 2004 and prior to December 4, 2006).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.11  
10.12*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.12  
10.13*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.3  
10.14*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-K  December 9, 2004  10.12  

      Incorporated by Reference   
Exhibit
No.
  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
10.15*  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used prior to December 4, 2006).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.14  
10.16*  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.15  
10.17*  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.2  
10.18*  Form of Performance Share Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.1  
10.19*  Form of Stock Unit Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-Q  February 8, 2005  10.23  
10.20*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Garry W. Rogerson.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.4  
10.21*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.5  
10.22*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Martin O’Donoghue.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.6  
10.23*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sergio Piras.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.7  
10.24*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Arthur W. Homan.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.8  
10.25*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sean M. Wirtjes.        X
10.26*  Description of Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.23  
10.27*  Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers.        X
18.1  Preferability letter regarding inventory accounting principle change.  10-K  December 7, 2000  18.1  
21  Subsidiaries of the Registrant.        X
23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.        X
      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith

10.3

  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2005, between Varian, Inc. and Jabil Circuit, Inc.  8-K  March 17, 2005  2.1  

10.4

  Form of Indemnity Agreement between Varian, Inc. and its Directors and Officers.  10-K  December 9, 2004  10.5  

10.5*

  Varian, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  February 1, 2008  10.1  

10.6*

  Varian, Inc. Management Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.9  

10.7*

  Varian, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of November 13, 2008.  10-K  November 26, 2008  10.7  

10.8*

  Varian, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  10-Q  May 10, 2000  10.1  

10.9*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning April 2, 1999 and prior to November 10, 2003).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.9  

10.10*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 10, 2003 and prior to November 11, 2004).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.10  

10.11*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 11, 2004 and prior to December 4, 2006).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.11  

10.12*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.12  

10.13*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.3  

10.14*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-K  December 9, 2004  10.12  

10.15*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors—For New Director/Chairman Grants (used beginning February 1, 2008).  10-Q  May 6, 2008  10.29  

10.16*

  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors—For Annual Director Grants (used beginning February 1, 2008).  10-Q  May 6, 2008  10.30  

      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith

10.17*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used prior to December 4, 2006).10-KDecember 7, 200610.14

10.18*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).10-KDecember 7, 200610.15

10.19*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).10-QFebruary 5, 200810.17

10.20*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Certain Executive Officers (used beginning March 13, 2009).8-KMarch 17, 200910.1

10.21*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy (used beginning March 13, 2009).8-KMarch 17, 200910.2

10.22*

Form of Performance Share Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).8-KNovember 13, 200710.1

10.23*

Form of Performance Share Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning October 6, 2008).8-KSeptember 15, 200810.2

10.24*

Form of Stock Unit Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.10-QFebruary 8, 200510.23

10.25*

Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Garry W. Rogerson.8-KNovember 13, 200710.4

10.26*

Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Garry W. Rogerson.X

10.27*

Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy.8-KNovember 13, 200710.5

10.28*

Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy.X

10.29*

Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Martin O’Donoghue.8-KNovember 13, 200710.6

10.30*

Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Martin O’Donoghue.X

      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith

10.31*

  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sergio Piras.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.7  

10.32*

  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Sergio Piras.        X

10.33*

  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Arthur W. Homan.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.8  

10.34*

  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Arthur W. Homan.        X

10.35*

  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sean M. Wirtjes.  10-K  November 21, 2007  10.25  

10.36*

  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Sean M. Wirtjes.        X

10.37*

  Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2008, between Varian, Inc. and Robert W. Dean II.  8-K  September 15, 2008  10.1  

10.38*

  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Robert W. Dean II.        X

10.39*

  Change in Control Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, between Varian, Inc. and Gordon B. Tredger.  10-K  November 26, 2008  10.30  

10.40*

  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Gordon B. Tredger.        X

10.41*

  Description of Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-Q  February 10, 2009  10.31  

10.42*

  Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers.  10-K  November 21, 2007  10.27  

10.43*

  Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements between Varian S.p.A. and Sergio Piras.  10-Q  February 5, 2008  10.28  

18.1

  Preferability letter regarding inventory accounting principle change.  10-K  December 7, 2000  18.1  

21

  Subsidiaries of the Registrant.        X

23

  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.        X

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

No.

Exhibit Description

FormDate FiledExhibit
Number(s)
Filed
Herewith

31.1

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X

31.2

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X

32.1

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X

32.2

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X


* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

   

VARIAN, INC.

(Registrant)

Dated: November 21, 200725, 2009

  By: 

/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY

G. Edward McClammy

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ GARRY W. ROGERSON

Garry W. Rogerson

  

PresidentChairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 November 21, 200725, 2009

/s/ G. EDWARD MCCLAMMY

G. Edward McClammy

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal(Principal Financial Officer)

 November 21, 200725, 2009

/s/ SROBERT W. DEAN M. WIRTJESII

Sean M. WirtjesRobert W. Dean II

  

Vice President and Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

 November 21, 2007

/s/ ALLEN J. LAUER

Allen J. Lauer

Chairman of the BoardNovember 21, 200725, 2009

/s/ RICHARD U. DE SCHUTTER

Richard U. De Schutter

  Director 

November 21, 200725, 2009

/s/ JAMES T. GLOVER

James T. Glover

DirectorNovember 25, 2009

/s/ JOHN G. MCDONALD

John G. McDonald

  Director November 21, 200725, 2009

/s/ WAYNE R. MOON

Wayne R. Moon

  Director November 21, 200725, 2009

/s/ ELIZABETH E. TALLETT

Elizabeth E. Tallett

  Director November 21, 2007

EXHIBIT INDEX

      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
  2.1  Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement, dated as of January 14, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  2.1  
  3.1  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  3.1, 3.2  
  3.2  By-Laws of Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  3.3  
  4.1  Specimen Common Stock Certificate.  10/A  March 8, 1999  4.1  
  4.2  Rights Agreement, dated as of February 18, 1999, between Varian, Inc. and First Chicago Trust Company of New York.  10/A  March 8, 1999  4.2  
  4.3  First Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2001, between Varian, Inc. and First Chicago Trust Company of New York.  8-A/A  November 21, 2001  2  
  4.4  Second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2004, between Varian, Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.  10-Q  May 17, 2004  4.4  
10.1  Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of April 2, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.2  
10.2  Varian, Inc. Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement and Assumption dated as of April 2, 1999.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.6  
10.3  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2005, between Varian, Inc. and Jabil Circuit, Inc.  8-K  March 17, 2005  2.1  
10.4  Form of Indemnity Agreement between Varian, Inc. and its Directors and Officers.  10-K  December 9, 2004  10.5  
10.5*  Varian, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of December 2, 2004.  10-Q  February 8, 2005  10.6  
10.6*  Varian, Inc. Management Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.9  
10.7*  Varian, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.10  
10.8*  Varian, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  10-Q  May 10, 2000  10.1  
10.9*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning April 2, 1999 and prior to November 10, 2003).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.9  

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

No.

Exhibit Description

FormDate FiledExhibit
Number(s)
Filed
Herewith
10.10*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 10, 2003 and prior to November 11, 2004).10-KDecember 7, 200610.10
10.11*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 11, 2004 and prior to December 4, 2006).10-KDecember 7, 200610.11
10.12*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).10-KDecember 7, 200610.12
10.13*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors (used beginning November 8, 2007).8-KNovember 13, 200710.3
10.14*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.10-KDecember 9, 200410.12
10.15*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used prior to December 4, 2006).10-KDecember 7, 200610.14
10.16*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).10-KDecember 7, 200610.15
10.17*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).8-KNovember 13, 200710.2
10.18*Form of Performance Share Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).8-KNovember 13, 200710.1
10.19*Form of Stock Unit Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.10-QFebruary 8, 200510.23
10.20*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Garry W. Rogerson.8-KNovember 13, 200710.4
10.21*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy.8-KNovember 13, 200710.5
10.22*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Martin O’Donoghue.8-KNovember 13, 200710.6

      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  Date Filed  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
10.23*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sergio Piras.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.7  
10.24*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Arthur W. Homan.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.8  
10.25*  Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sean M. Wirtjes.        X
10.26*  Description of Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.23  
10.27*  Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers.        X
18.1  Preferability letter regarding inventory accounting principle change.  10-K  December 7, 2000  18.1  
21  Subsidiaries of the Registrant.        X
23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.        X
31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X
31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X
32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        
32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        


*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.25, 2009

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

 

The following Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are required to be included in Item 8:

 

   Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-2

Consolidated Statement of Earnings for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

  F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheet at fiscal year end 20072009 and 20062008

  F-4

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

  

F-5

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

  F-6

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-7

 

The following Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule of the Registrant and its subsidiaries for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 is filed as a part of this Report as required to be included in Item 15(a) and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries:

 

Schedule

     Page

II

  

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

  F-36F-39

 

All other required schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is given in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Varian, Inc.:

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Varian, Inc. and its subsidiaries at September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 and September 29, 2006,October 3, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Item 9A. Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, effective September 28, 2007, the Company adopted ASC 715 and changed its method of accounting for defined benefit plans.

As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, effective September 29, 2007, the Company adopted ASC 740 and changed its method of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Jose, California

November 20, 200725, 2009

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
 Sept. 30,
2005
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 

Sales

        

Products

  $  796,983  $  720,689  $  666,018   $    676,129   $869,556   $    796,983  

Services

   123,615   114,016   106,777    130,615    142,959    123,615  
                    

Total sales

   920,598   834,705   772,795    806,744    1,012,515    920,598  
                    

Cost of sales

        

Products

   435,397   398,465   378,907    377,941    476,555    435,397  

Services

   69,724   61,891   57,229    74,113    83,506    69,724  
                    

Total cost of sales

   505,121   460,356   436,136    452,054    560,061    505,121  
                    

Gross profit

   415,477   374,349   336,659    354,690    452,454    415,477  

Operating expenses

        

Selling, general and administrative

   257,754   241,049   221,776    239,282    277,478    257,754  

Research and development

   65,169   59,730   53,942    56,425    71,810    65,169  

Purchased in-process research and development

      756   700        1,703      
                    

Total operating expenses

   322,923   301,535   276,418    295,707    350,991    322,923  
                    

Operating earnings

   92,554   72,814   60,241    58,983    101,463    92,554  

Interest income (expense)

    

Impairment of private company equity investment (Note 2)

       (3,018    

Interest income

   6,152   4,022   5,416    1,650    5,930    6,152  

Interest expense

   (1,878)  (2,172)  (2,204)   (1,486  (1,656  (1,878
                    

Total interest income, net

   4,274   1,850   3,212 
          

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes

   96,828   74,664   63,453 

Earnings before income taxes

   59,147    102,719    96,828  

Income tax expense

   33,212   24,595   16,766    20,527    37,605    33,212  
          

Earnings from continuing operations

   63,616   50,069   46,687 
          

Discontinued operations (Note 3)

    

Earnings from operations of disposed Electronics Manufacturing business, net of taxes

         5,385 

Gain on sale of Electronics Manufacturing business, net of taxes

         73,885 
          

Earnings from discontinued operations

         79,270 
                    

Net earnings

  $63,616  $50,069  $125,957   $38,620   $65,114   $63,616  
                    

Net earnings per basic share:

    

Continuing operations

  $2.09  $1.62  $1.39 

Discontinued operations

         2.35 
          

Net earnings

  $2.09  $1.62  $3.74 
          

Net earnings per diluted share:

    

Continuing operations

  $2.05  $1.59  $1.36 

Discontinued operations

         2.31 
          

Net earnings

  $2.05  $1.59  $3.67 
          

Shares used in per share calculations:

    

Net earnings per share:

    

Basic

   30,457   30,929   33,673   $1.34   $2.20   $2.09  
                    

Diluted

   31,004   31,424   34,355   $1.34   $2.17   $2.05  
                    

Shares used in per share calculation:

    

Basic

   28,785    29,620    30,457  
          

Diluted

     28,936      30,072      31,004  
          

 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(In thousands, except par value amounts)

 

  Fiscal Year End
  Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008

ASSETS

        

Current assets

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $  196,396  $  154,155  $  209,348  $  103,895

Accounts receivable, net

   187,429   177,037   159,958   199,420

Inventories

   140,533   133,662   136,704   161,039

Deferred taxes

   38,068   33,235   38,349   32,287

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   17,332   15,728   15,488   15,663
            

Total current assets

   579,758   513,817   559,847   512,304

Property, plant and equipment, net

   110,792   112,528   114,363   110,343

Goodwill

   193,760   181,563   216,223   218,208

Intangible assets, net

   31,572   39,143   28,334   36,972

Other assets

   20,951   14,543   25,420   24,089
            

Total assets

  $936,833  $861,594  $944,187  $901,916
            

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

        

Current liabilities

        

Current portion of long-term debt

  $6,250  $2,500  $6,250  $

Accounts payable

   72,588   73,138   63,368   70,923

Deferred profit

   13,641   13,796   8,935   10,957

Accrued liabilities

   159,109   150,812   171,103   167,173
            

Total current liabilities

   251,588   240,246   249,656   249,053

Long-term debt

   18,750   25,000   12,500   18,750

Deferred taxes

   4,050   3,721   2,505   4,341

Other liabilities

   44,358   40,587   41,255   43,431
            

Total liabilities

   318,746   309,554   305,916   315,575
            

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15)

    

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15)

    

Stockholders’ equity

        

Preferred stock—par value $0.01, authorized—1,000 shares;
issued—none

            

Common stock—par value $0.01, authorized—99,000 shares; issued and outstanding—30,345 shares at September 28, 2007 and 30,870 shares at September 29, 2006

   351,330   319,090

Common stock—par value $0.01, authorized—99,000 shares; issued and outstanding—28,971 shares at October 2, 2009 and 28,917 shares at October 3, 2008

   368,324   356,192

Retained earnings

   199,471   204,182   220,068   184,678

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   67,286   28,768   49,879   45,471
            

Total stockholders’ equity

   618,087   552,040   638,271   586,341
            

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $936,833  $861,594  $944,187  $901,916
            

 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

 

 Common Stock Retained
Earnings
  Treasury
Stock at
Cost
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Total  Total
Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
Earnings
  Treasury
Stock at

Cost
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

Income
  Total  Total
Comprehensive

Income
 
 Shares Amount  Common Stock 

Balance, October 1, 2004

 34,838  $298,553  $211,626  $  $17,032  $527,211  
Shares Amount Retained
Earnings
  Treasury
Stock at

Cost
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

Income
  Total Total
Comprehensive

Income
 
 30,870   $ 319,090   $ $

Net earnings

       125,957         125,957  $125,957          

Other comprehensive income

       

Currency translation adjustment

             (2,653)  (2,653)  (2,653)

Minimum pension liability, net of tax of $209

             (98)  (98)  (98)

Other comprehensive income:

       

Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of ($5,689)

                 38,264    38,264    38,264  

Minimum pension liability, net of tax of ($1,198)

                 2,504    2,504    2,504  
         

Total comprehensive income

       $104,384  
         

Adjustment for initial adoption of new accounting standard for pensions, net of tax of $649

                 (2,250  (2,250 

Issuance of common stock and stock units

 1,156    31,897                31,897   

Share-based compensation expense

     9,946                9,946   

Tax benefit from share-based plans

     8,769                8,769   

Repurchase of common stock

 (1,681          (86,699      (86,699 

Retirement of treasury stock

     (18,372  (68,327  86,699           
                   

Balance, September 28, 2007

 30,345    351,330    199,471        67,286    618,087   

Net earnings

         65,114            65,114   $65,114  

Other comprehensive income:

       

Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $283

                 (22,263  (22,263  (22,263

Minimum liability for defined benefit pension and other postretirement obligations, net of tax of ($653)

                 448    448    448  
         

Total comprehensive income

       $43,299  
         

Issuance of common stock and stock units

 536    18,228                18,228   

Share-based compensation expense

     9,673                9,673   

Tax benefit from share-based plans

     894                894   

Repurchase of common stock

 (1,964          (106,859      (106,859 

Retirement of treasury stock

     (23,933  (82,926  106,859           

Adjustment for initial adoption of new accounting standard for tax

         3,019            3,019   
                   

Balance, October 3, 2008

 28,917    356,192    184,678        45,471    586,341   

Net earnings

         38,620            38,620   $38,620  

Other comprehensive income:

       

Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of ($1,532)

                 5,791    5,791    5,791  

Minimum liability for defined benefit pension and other postretirement obligations, net of tax of $437

                 (1,383  (1,383  (1,383
                  

Total comprehensive income

       $123,206        $43,028  
                  

Issuance of common stock and stock units

 949   18,363            18,363   414    8,139                8,139   

Share-based compensation expense

    415            415       7,705                7,705   

Tax benefit from share-based plans

    9,113            9,113       705                705   

Repurchase of common stock

          (178,786)     (178,786)  (360          (7,647      (7,647 

Retirement of treasury stock

 (4,771)  (43,521)  (135,265)  178,786             (4,417  (3,230  7,647           
                                      

Balance, September 30, 2005

 31,016   282,923   202,318      14,281   499,522  

Net earnings

       50,069         50,069  $50,069 

Other comprehensive income

       

Currency translation adjustment

             14,381   14,381   14,381 

Minimum pension liability, net of tax of ($121)

             106   106   106 

Balance, October 2, 2009

 28,971   $368,324   $220,068   $   $49,879   $638,271   
                            

Total comprehensive income

       $64,556 
         

Issuance of common stock and stock units

 1,369   34,060            34,060  

Share-based compensation expense

    8,712            8,712  

Tax benefit from share-based plans

    8,245            8,245  

Repurchase of common stock

          (63,055)     (63,055) 

Retirement of treasury stock

 (1,515)  (14,850)  (48,205)  63,055        
                   

Balance, September 29, 2006

 30,870   319,090   204,182      28,768   552,040  

Net earnings

       63,616         63,616  $63,616 

Other comprehensive income

       

Currency translation adjustment

             38,264   38,264   38,264 

Minimum pension liability, net of tax of ($1,198)

             2,504   2,504   2,504 
         

Total comprehensive income

       $104,384 
         

Adjustment for initial adoption of SFAS 158, net of tax of $649

             (2,250)  (2,250) 

Issuance of common stock and stock units

 1,156   31,897            31,897  

Share-based compensation expense

    9,946            9,946  

Tax benefit from share-based plans

    8,769            8,769  

Repurchase of common stock

          (86,699)     (86,699) 

Retirement of treasury stock

 (1,681)  (18,372)  (68,327)  86,699        
                   

Balance, September 28, 2007

 30,345  $351,330  $199,471  $  $  67,286  $618,087  
                   

 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

  Fiscal Year Ended  Fiscal Years Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
 Sept. 30,
2005
  October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 

Cash flows from operating activities

       

Net earnings

  $63,616  $50,069  $125,957  $      38,620   $65,114   $      63,616  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities

    

Gain on sale of Electronics Manufacturing business

         (73,885)

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

   

Depreciation and amortization

   29,248   27,470   26,249   26,783    29,346    29,248  

(Gain) loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment

   (452)  92   12 

Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment

  (230  (474  (452

Impairment of private company equity investment

      3,018      

Purchased in-process research and development

      756   700       1,703      

Share-based compensation expense

   9,946   8,712   415   7,705    9,673    9,946  

Tax benefit from share-based plans

   9,563   8,245   9,113 

Excess tax benefit from share-based plans

   (9,090)  (7,700)     (705  (894  (9,090

Deferred taxes

   (9,365)  (12,823)  (5,553)  (12,211  (1,791  (9,404

Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures:

    

Unrealized loss (gain) on currency remeasurement

  525    (5,286  8,826  

Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions:

   

Accounts receivable, net

   1,074   (13,449)  5,398   42,387    (12,205  1,074  

Inventories

   400   (7,256)  6,304   24,663    (19,428  400  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   (387)  5,234   (2,212)  403    3,300    (387

Other assets

   (4,110)  415   543   168    (1,462  (4,110

Accounts payable

   (4,733)  10,004   3,615   (8,663  (1,072  (4,733

Deferred profit

   (176)  1,504   (414)  (2,103  (3,526  (176

Accrued liabilities

   (1,499)  6,046   (18,398)  (3,061  14,053    8,103  

Other liabilities

   15,822   2,019   1,431   (1,394  (1,048  6,996  
                   

Net cash provided by operating activities

   99,857   79,338   79,275   112,887    79,021    99,857  
                   

Cash flows from investing activities

       

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

   4,966   797   765   6,454    1,735    4,966  

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

   (19,396)  (20,295)  (23,080)  (25,073  (23,960  (19,396

Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired

   (7,115)  (72,854)  (28,698)

Proceeds from sale of short-term investments

         35,000 

Purchase of short-term investments

         (10,000)

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

  (2,449  (55,167  (7,115

Private company equity investments

   (3,000)  (652)  (4,000)      (18  (3,000

Proceeds from sale of Electronics Manufacturing business, net of transaction costs and taxes

         150,791 
                   

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

   (24,545)  (93,004)  120,778 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (21,068  (77,410  (24,545
                   

Cash flows from financing activities

       

Repayment of debt

   (2,500)  (2,500)  (7,106)      (6,250  (2,500

Repurchase of common stock

   (86,699)  (63,055)  (178,786)  (7,647  (106,859  (86,699

Issuance of common stock

   31,897   34,060   18,363   8,139    18,228    31,897  

Excess tax benefit from share-based plans

   9,090   7,700      705    894    9,090  

Transfers to Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

   (646)  (649)  (882)  (645  (600  (646
                   

Net cash used in financing activities

   (48,858)  (24,444)  (168,411)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  552    (94,587  (48,858
                   

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   15,787   3,771   (3,130)  13,082    475    15,787  
                   

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   42,241   (34,339)  28,512   105,453    (92,501  42,241  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   154,155   188,494   159,982   103,895    196,396    154,155  
                   

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $196,396  $154,155  $188,494  $209,348   $103,895   $196,396  
                   

Supplemental cash flow information

       
    

Income taxes paid, net of refunds received

  $36,317  $23,276  $66,961  $30,453   $38,793   $36,317  
                   

Interest paid

  $1,765  $2,030  $2,151  $1,261   $    1,626   $1,765  
                   

 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1.    Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

 

Varian, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells and services scientific instruments (including analytical instruments, research products and related software, consumable products, accessories and services) and vacuum products (and related accessories and services). These businesses primarily serve life science, industrial, academicenvironmental, energy, and applied research and other customers.

 

Until April 2, 1999, the business of the Company was operated as the Instruments business of Varian Associates, Inc. (“VAI”). On that date, VAI distributed to the holders of its common stock one share of common stock of the Company and one share of common stock of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (“VSEA”), which was formerly operated as the Semiconductor Equipment business of VAI, for each share of VAI (the “Distribution”). VAI retained its Health Care Systems business and changed its name to Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“VMS”). Transfers made to VMS under the terms of the Distribution are reflected as financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

 

As described more fully in Note 3,Merger Agreement.    On July 26, 2009, the Company, soldAgilent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Agilent”), and Cobalt Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Agilent (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, merge with and into the Company and the Company will survive the merger and continue as a wholly owned subsidiary of Agilent (the “Merger”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and subject to the conditions thereof, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into the right to receive $52.00 in cash, without interest.

The Company and Agilent have made certain representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, (i) the Company will conduct its Electronics Manufacturing business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice, and refrain from taking specified actions, during the secondperiod between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, (ii) the Board of Directors of the Company will recommend to its stockholders adoption of the Merger Agreement, and (iii) the Company will not solicit, initiate, seek or knowingly encourage or facilitate, any inquiry, proposal or offer from, furnish non-public information to, or participate in any discussions with, or enter into any agreement with, any person or group regarding any alternative transaction.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and Agilent and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the Company may be required to pay Agilent a termination fee of $46 million.

The Boards of Directors of the Company and Agilent approved the Merger and the Merger Agreement. In addition, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, all directors and certain executive officers of the Company, who together held less than 1% of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of July 26, 2009, entered into voting agreements whereby they agreed among other things to vote all shares of the Company’s common stock held by them in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

On October 5, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved the Merger. The Merger remains subject to regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of certain other closing conditions.

Fiscal Year.    The Company’s fiscal years reported are the 52- or 53-week periods that end on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2009 was comprised of the 52-week period that ended on October 2, 2009. Fiscal year 2008 was comprised of the 53-week period that ended on October 3, 2008. Fiscal year 2007 was comprised of the 52-week period that ended on September 28, 2007. Each quarter during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 was comprised of 13 weeks, respectively, except for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005. In connection with2008, which was comprised of 14 weeks.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Principles of Consolidation.    The Consolidated Financial Statements include the sale,accounts of the Company determined that this business should be accounted for as discontinued operations underand its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates.    The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). Consequently,requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the resultsreported amounts of operationsassets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Electronics Manufacturing businessfinancial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these Consolidated Financial Statements include revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, inventory valuation reserves, share-based compensation, product warranty reserves, environmental liabilities and income taxes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements.    During the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009, the Company identified a clerical error related to the calculation of the fiscal year 2008 income tax provision. The impact of this error was an understatement of income tax expense and an overstatement of consolidated net earnings of $1.3 million during the fiscal quarter and fiscal year ended October 3, 2008. The error also resulted in an overstatement of current deferred tax assets and retained earnings of $1.3 million at October 3, 2008, January 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009. The Company assessed the materiality of this error and concluded that the previously issued financial statements are not materially misstated. The Company has corrected the immaterial error by revising the prior period financial statements. Accordingly, the October 3, 2008 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of earnings and of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008 presented herein have been excluded fromrevised to correct for the immaterial error. The revision did not impact net cash provided by operating activities or net cash used in investing activities or financing activities for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008.

Subsequent Events.    In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855,Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented and have instead been presentedConsolidated Financial Statements were issued on a discontinued operations basis.November 25, 2009.

 

Note 2.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Fiscal Year.    The Company’s fiscal years reported are the 52-week periods that ended on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2007 was comprised of the 52-week period ended on September 28, 2007. Fiscal year 2006 was comprised of the 52-week period ended on September 29, 2006. Fiscal year 2005 was comprised of the 52-week period ended on September 30, 2005.

Principles of Consolidation.    The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates.    The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these Consolidated Financial Statements include revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, inventory valuation reserves, share-based compensation, product warranty reserves, environmental liabilities and income taxes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition.    The Company accounts for its revenue recognition in accordance with the provisions of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. (“SAB”) 104,Revenue Recognition.    The Company’s revenues are derived from product sales (including accessory sales) and services. For product sales and accessory sales, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the contract price is fixed or determinable, the product or accessory has been delivered, title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Product sales that do not involve unique customer acceptance terms or new specifications or technology with customer acceptance provisions, but that do involve installation services, are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements, where the larger of the contractual billing holdback or the fair value of the installation service is deferred when the product is delivered and subsequently recognized when the installation is complete. For certain other product sales that do involve unique customer acceptance terms or new specifications or technology with customer acceptance provisions, all

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

revenue is deferred until all contractually required customer acceptance provisions and product specifications have been satisfied. In all cases, the fair value of undelivered elements, such as accessories or services purchased by customers in connection with a product sale, is deferred until the related items are delivered to the customer. Revenue related to service contracts is recognized ratably over the term of the contracts. Unearned maintenance and service contract revenue is included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Revenue related to incident-based paid service and training services is recognized when the related services are provided to the customer.

 

Deferred profit on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet is comprised of the profit (revenue less related cost of sales) on certain transactions that has been deferred under the Company’s revenue

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

recognition policy. Deferred profit relates to transactions in the Company’s Scientific Instruments segment that typically fit one of the following descriptions:

 

A product has been delivered to a customer but revenue cannot yet be recognized, typically due to non-standard specifications or acceptance requirements that have not yet been demonstrated. In these cases, the revenue and related cost of salesales that would ordinarily be recorded in the income statement of earnings at the time of delivery are instead recorded to deferred profit. This accounting is reversed and the revenue and related cost of sales are recorded in the income statement of earnings once the non-standard specifications or acceptance requirements have been demonstrated and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

 

A product has been delivered and 100% of the contract value is billable per the terms of the arrangement but post-delivery obligations (e.g., installation) remain. In these cases, revenue equal to the fair value of the post-delivery obligations is deferred and included in deferred profit when the product is delivered. Once the post-delivery obligations have been met, the deferred revenue is reversed out of deferred profit and recorded as revenue in the income statement.statement of earnings. Since installation costs are typically not significant relative to total product costs and the time to complete an installation is usually very short, the Company rarely needs to defer installation costs associated with deferred installation revenue.

The following table summarizes the components of deferred profit:

   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
 
(in thousands)       

Deferred profit

   

Revenue

  $20,601   $21,568  

Cost of sales

  $(11,666 $(10,611

 

In certain other cases, products are delivered but post-delivery obligations (e.g., installation) remain and a portion of the contract value is not billable until such obligations have been met (the “holdback”). In these cases, recognition of revenue equal to the greater of the holdback or the fair value of the undelivered service element is deferred. However, since holdbacks are not billable until the related undelivered element (typically installation) has been delivered, no invoice is issued and no receivable is recorded for the holdback amount and the related revenue is not recorded. Accordingly, deferred revenue relating to holdbacks is not recorded and does not otherwise impact the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

The Company sells products and accessories predominantly through its direct sales force. As a result, the use of distributors is generally limited to geographic regions where the Company’s direct sales force is less developed. The Company does not normally offer product return or exchange rights (other than those relating to non-conforming or defective goods under warranty) or price protection allowances to its customers, including its distributors. Payment terms granted to distributors are similar to those granted to other customers and payments are not dependent upon the distributors’ receipt of payment from their end-user customers.

 

The Company’s products are generally subject to warranties and the Company provides for the estimated future costs of repair or replacement in cost of sales at the time the related sale is recognized.

 

Foreign Currency Translation.    The Company uses the local currency as the functional currency in each country in which it operates.operates subsidiaries. The functional currencies of the Company’s operations are primarily the U.S. dollar and the Euro and, to a lesser extent, the British pound, Australian dollar, Japanese yen and various other currencies. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates at the end of the fiscal yearperiod and income and expense items are translated at exchange rates prevailing during the year.period. Translation gains and losses are included in the cumulative translation adjustment component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

adjustment componentfrom transactions and translation of accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising from transactionsperiod-end balances denominated in currencies other than a subsidiary’s functional currency are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk.    Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable notes receivable and foreign exchange forward contracts. The Company invests primarily in demand deposits, short-term U.S. Treasury securities and money market funds. The Company sells its products and extends trade credit to a large number of customers, who are dispersed across many different industries and geographies. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of these customers and generally does not require collateral from them. Tradethem, although the Company does require letters of credit to mitigate credit risk when considered appropriate. As of both October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, trade accounts receivable include allowances for doubtful accounts as of September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 of $1.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively.$1.3 million. Delinquent account balances are written off when management determines that the likelihood of collection is no longer probable. No single customer represented 10% or more of the Company’s total sales in fiscal year 2009, 2008 and 2007 or trade accounts receivable at fiscal year end 2009 or 2008. The Company seeks to minimize credit risk relating to foreign exchange forward contracts by limiting its counter-parties to major financial institutions. No single customer represented 10% or more of the Company’s total sales in fiscal year 2007, 2006 and 2005 or trade accounts receivable at fiscal year end 2007 or 2006.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents.    The Company considersincludes currency on hand, demand deposits, money market accountsfunds and all highly liquid debt securities with an original maturity of three months or less to bein cash and cash equivalents. The cost basis of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short period of time to maturity.

 

Inventories.    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being computed on an average-cost basis. Provisions are made for potentially excess or slow-moving inventories. When a loss provision is made, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or an increase in that newly established cost basis.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment.Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed currently.as incurred. Real property (land) is not depreciated. Plant and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and accelerated methods for tax purposes.method. Machinery and equipment lives vary from three to 10 years and buildings are depreciated over 20 to 40 years. Purchased software is depreciated over five to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives or the remaining term of the lease, whichever is less. Depreciation expense totaled $21.1$19.7 million, $18.9$20.8 million and $17.1$21.1 million in fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, respectively. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciationcapitalized costs are removed from the accounts.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets.    Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (“SFAS”) 142,ASC 350-20-35,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized, but must be tested for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. The process of testing goodwill for impairment consists of a two-step process. The first step is the comparison of the fair value to the carrying value of the reporting unit to determine if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The second step measures the amount of an impairment loss and is only performed if the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company performed annual goodwill impairment tests during the second quarter of fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in each business combination. We conducted our annual evaluation of goodwill by reporting unit during the quarter ended April 3, 2009, and concluded that the estimated fair value of Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies reporting units exceeded their carrying value. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, cash flows, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. Unanticipated changes in revenue, gross margin, long-

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

term growth factor, cash flows or discount rate could result in a material impact on the estimated fair values of our reporting units. There have been no significant events or circumstances affecting the valuation of goodwill subsequent to the impairment test performed in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended October 2, 2009.

 

Identifiable intangible assets recorded in connection with acquisitions are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from two to 20 years. Acquired in-process research and development is immediately expensed.

 

Investments in Privately Held Companies.    The Company has equity investments in privately held companies which, because of its ownership interest and other factors, are carried at cost. These investments are evaluated under the requirements of FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 46(R),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51, and other applicable guidance to determine the appropriate accounting treatment, including whether the Company must consolidate the investee company. Based on these evaluations, the Company has determined that no consolidation is required. These investments are included in Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company monitors these

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

investments for impairment and will make appropriate reductions in carrying values if the Company determines that an impairment charge is required based primarily on the near-term prospects and financial condition of these companies.

During fiscal year 2008, the Company became aware of information which raised substantial doubt about the ability of a small, privately held company in which the Company held a cost-method equity investment to continue as a going concern. Based on this information, the Company determined that the fair value of its investment had declined and that the decline was other-than-temporary. As a result, the Company wrote off the entire $3.0 million carrying value of its investment via an impairment charge in the period.

 

Long-Lived Assets.    The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. All long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair market value, less expected selling costs.

 

Other Liabilities.    In order to conform to the current-year presentation, the consolidated balance sheet for fiscal year 2006 has been revised to include $18.3 million in Other (long-term) liabilities that had previously been included in Accrued (current) liabilities.

Share-Based Compensation.    Effective October 1, 2005, theThe Company adoptedaccounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R),ASC 718,Share-Based PaymentStock Compensation, which establishes the accounting for share-based awards and the inclusion of their fair value in net earnings in the respective periods the awards were earned. In adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company elected to utilize the modified prospective transition method, which requires thatConsistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) be applied to new awards made afterASC 718, the effective date and to any awards that were unvested as of the effective date, but does not require the restatement of prior periods.

The Company estimates the fair value of share-based compensationstock options and shares issued under its employee stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. (“SAB”) 107,Share-Based Payment.model. Fair value is estimated on the date of grant and is then recognized (net of estimated forfeitures) as expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period) in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. .

The determination of fair value and the timing of expense using option pricing models such as the Black-Scholes model require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected forfeiture rate and life expected forfeituresof the option and the expected price volatility of the underlying stock. The Company estimates the expected forfeiture and expected life assumptions based on historical experience. TheIn determining the Company’s expected stock price volatility assumption, is determined using a combination ofthe Company reviews both the historical and implied volatility of the Company’s common stock, with implied volatility based on the implied volatility of publicly traded options on the Company’s common stock. The Company believes thatdetermines the expected stock price volatility assumption using a combination of historical and implied volatility is more reflectiveunless the volume or maturity of current marketthese publicly traded options does not satisfy the conditions and a better indicator of expected futureto use implied volatility.

In connection with its adoption of SFAS 123(R), the The Company elected to use the practical transition option (also known as the “short-cut” method) to calculate its historical pool of windfall tax benefits as allowed under FASB Staff Position No. (“FSP”) FAS 123(R)-3,Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.benefits. The practical transition option allows the use of a simplified method to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (the “APIC pool”), which is available to absorb shortfalls when actual tax deductions are less than the related book share-based compensation cost recognized subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123(R).ASC 718.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company applied the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. (“APB”) 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock compensation plans and provided the required pro forma disclosures of SFAS 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Research and Development.    Research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed as they are incurred.

 

Advertising CostsCosts..    Advertising costs are included as part of selling, general and administrative expense and are expensed as they are incurred. Advertising expense was $2.7 million in fiscal year 2009, $4.0 million in fiscal year 2008 and $3.2 million in fiscal year 2007, $2.9 million in fiscal year 2006 and $3.0 million in fiscal year 2005.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)2007.

 

Income TaxesTaxes..    The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires thatrecognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS 109 also requires that deferredDeferred tax assets beare reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized in the future.

 

The Company accrues income tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions by evaluating whether the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit and then measures the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company reevaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. Potential interest and penalties associated with such uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.Standards.    In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which addresses accounting for, and disclosure of, uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FIN 48 and is not yet able to determine whether its adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB 108,Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 requires companies to evaluate the materiality of identified unadjusted errors on each financial statement and related disclosures using both the rollover and the iron curtain approach. The rollover approach quantifies misstatements based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement. The iron curtain approach quantifies misstatements based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, irrespective of the misstatement’s year of origin. Adjustment of financial statements would be required if either approach resulted in a material misstatement. SAB 108 applies to annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, new accounting standards for fair value measurementsFair Value Measurements,. SFAS 157 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 appliesIn February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of the new accounting standard for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to previous accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.2008, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company adopted the new accounting standard for fair value measurements effective October 4, 2008 with the exception of the application of the accounting standard to nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities (see Note 3). The Company does not expect the adoption in the first quarter of SFAS 157fiscal year 2010 of the provisions deferred to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

 

In FebruaryDecember 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159,The Fair Value Optionrevised the accounting standards for Financial Assetsbusiness combinations, which retains the fundamental requirements of the original pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all business combinations but also provides revised guidance for recognizing and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement 115, which provides companies with an option to measure eligible financialmeasuring identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in their entiretythe acquiree. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value. The fair value, option may be applied instrument by instrument, and may be applied onlythe expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred.It also requires that certain tax contingencies and adjustments to entire instruments. If a company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in the item’s fair valuevaluation allowances related to business combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, must be reported as unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159adjusted to income tax expense, regardless of the date of the original business combination. This revised accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2007.2008. The Company is evaluatingdoes not expect its adoption in the options provided under SFAS 159 and their potential impact on its financial condition and results of operations if implemented.

Note 3.    Sale of Electronics Manufacturing Business and Discontinued Operations

On February 4, 2005, the Company and Jabil Circuit, Inc. (“Jabil”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) providing for the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the Company’s Electronics Manufacturing segment (the “Electronics Manufacturing Business”) to Jabil for $195.0 million in cash, subject to a post-closing working capital adjustment, which was subsequently settled during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal year 2005 and resulted2010 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. However, in the receipt of $6.6 million in additional purchase price by the Company. On March 11, 2005,event that the Company completedcompletes acquisitions subsequent to its adoption of the new guidance, the application of its provisions will likely have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, although the Company is not currently able to estimate the impact.

In April 2009, the FASB issued a new standard for business combinations that amends the accounting prescribed for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. This accounting standard requires pre-acquisition contingencies to be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably determined during the measurement period. If fair value cannot be reasonably determined, the accounting standard requires measurement based on the recognition and measurement criteria for contingencies. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect its adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on the Company’s

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

financial condition or results of operations. However, in the sale of the Electronics Manufacturing Business (the “Closing”) and transferred substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities and obligations of the Electronic Manufacturing Business to Jabil. In addition, effective as of the Closing,event that the Company and Jabil entered intocompletes acquisitions subsequent to its adoption, the application of its provisions will likely have a four-year Supply Agreement pursuant to which Jabil will continue to supply certain products tomaterial impact on the Company that were manufactured by the Electronics Manufacturing Business for the Company as of the Closing.

The Company has determined that the disposed Electronics Manufacturing Business should be accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS 144,Accounting for the Disposal of or Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and EITF Issue No. 03-13,Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FAS 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations. Consequently, theCompany’s results of operations, ofalthough the Electronics Manufacturing Business have been excluded fromCompany is not currently able to estimate the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented and have instead been presented on a discontinued operations basis.impact.

 

SalesIn December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements, which requires that ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the disposed Electronics Manufacturing Businessparent and the componentsamount of earnings from discontinued operationsconsolidated net income be clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires once a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. Sufficient disclosures are required to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years 2007, 2006beginning after December 15, 2008, and 2005requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. All other requirements are presented below:applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 of this accounting standard to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

 

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  Sept. 30,
2005
 

(in thousands)

      

Sales

  $  $  $80,245 
             

Earnings from operations of disposed Electronics Manufacturing Business

  $  $  $8,713 

Income tax expense

         (3,328)
             

Earnings from operations of disposed Electronics Manufacturing Business, net of taxes

            —            —   5,385 

Gain on sale of Electronics Manufacturing Business, net of taxes of $45,653 in fiscal year 2005

         73,885 
             

Earnings from discontinued operations

  $  —  $  —  $  79,270 
             

In April 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for the determination of the useful life of intangible assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The intent of this new accounting standard is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under the guidance for intangible assets and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under the guidance for business combinations. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. Given that this applies to intangible assets acquired after the effective date, the Company does not expect its adoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

 

In June 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for determining whether instruments granted in share-based transactions are participating securities. This new accounting standard states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method described in the guidance for earnings per share. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years, on a retrospective basis. The following table presentsCompany does not expect the calculationadoption in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to have a material impact on its earnings per share.

In December 2008, the FASB issued additional disclosure requirements for plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The required disclosures include a description of the gainCompany’s investment policies and strategies, the fair value of each major category of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets and the salesignificant concentrations of risk within plan assets. These additional disclosures are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of the Electronics Manufacturing Business recorded by the Company during fiscal year 2005:new disclosure requirements to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

 

   Fiscal Year
Ended
Sept. 30, 2005
 

(in thousands)

  

Proceeds from sale

  $  201,560 

Transaction costs

   (5,116)
     

Net proceeds

   196,444 

Net assets sold

   (76,906)
     

Gain on sale before income taxes

   119,538 

Income tax expense

   (45,653)
     

Gain on sale, net of taxes

  $73,885 
     

In October 2009, the FASB issued two new accounting standards that provide guidance for revenue recognition. The first standard revises guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This accounting standard replaces the term fair value in the revenue recognition allocation guidance with selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price of each deliverable will first be based on vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available, second on third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available and third on estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE are available. In addition the residual method is no longer permitted as vendors are now required to allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The second new accounting

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

standard excludes from the scope of software revenue recognition software components contained in, and essential to the functionality of, tangible products. These new accounting standards require expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures and are effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The following table presentsCompany does not expect the carrying amountsadoption of major classesthese accounting standards in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

Note 3.    Fair Value Measurements

Effective October 4, 2008 (the first day of fiscal year 2009), the Company adopted ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The Company elected to delay applying ASC 820 to certain non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities relatinguntil fiscal year 2010, as permitted by the guidance.

On the same date, the Company also adopted ASC 825 Financial Instruments,which permits entities to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. Since its adoption of ASC 825, the Company has not elected the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities that were not previously measured at fair value.

Fair Value Hierarchy.    ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:

Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2—Other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

As of October 2, 2009, the Company did not have any financial liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 2, 2009 follow:

   Fair Value Measurements Using:
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
  Total
(in thousands)            

Financial assets:

        

Money market funds (cash equivalents)

  $65,274  $        —  $        —  $65,274
                

Total financial assets

  $65,274  $  $  $65,274
                

The cost basis of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the Electronics Manufacturing Business at theshort period of time of the Closing:to maturity.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

   Carrying
Amount

(in thousands)

  

Assets

  

Accounts receivable

  $28,496

Inventories

   41,046

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   260
    

Total current assets

   69,802

Property, plant and equipment, net

   22,131

Goodwill

   2,102
    

Total assets

   94,035
    

Liabilities

  

Accounts payable

   14,705

Accrued liabilities

   2,424
    

Total current liabilities

   17,129

Long-term liabilities

   
    

Total liabilities

   17,129
    

Net assets sold

  $  76,906
    

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 4.    Balance Sheet Detail

 

   Fiscal Year End 
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
 

(in thousands)

   

Inventories

   

Raw materials and parts

  $64,130  $60,596 

Work in process

   24,842   23,238 

Finished goods

   51,561   49,828 
         
  $140,533  $133,662 
         

Property, plant and equipment

   

Land and land improvements

  $6,415  $6,784 

Buildings

   102,413   96,860 

Machinery and equipment

   167,655   152,962 

Construction in progress

   11,102   13,332 
         
   287,585   269,938 

Accumulated depreciation

   (176,793)  (157,410)
         
  $110,792  $112,528 
         

Accrued liabilities

   

Payroll and employee benefits

  $64,590  $49,040 

Deferred service revenue

   35,815   30,029 

Contract advances

   13,309   25,746 

Product warranty

   12,454   11,042 

Other

   32,941   34,955 
         
  $159,109  $150,812 
         

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
 
(in thousands)       

Inventories

   

Raw materials and parts

  $60,222   $77,447  

Work in process

   22,596    25,091  

Finished goods

   53,886    58,501  
         
  $136,704   $161,039  
         

Property, plant and equipment

   

Land and land improvements

  $6,676   $6,519  

Buildings

   120,832    102,746  

Machinery and equipment

   172,505    174,284  

Construction in progress

   2,399    8,585  
         
   302,412    292,134  

Accumulated depreciation

   (188,049  (181,791
         
  $114,363   $110,343  
         

Accrued liabilities

   

Payroll and employee benefits

  $57,305   $61,480  

Deferred service revenue

   38,958    35,404  

Contract advances

   21,502    20,760  

Product warranty

   13,273    13,867  

Other

   40,065    35,662  
         
  $171,103   $167,173  
         

 

Note 5.    Forward Exchange Contracts

Effective January 3, 2009 (the first day of the second quarter of fiscal year 2009), the Company adopted ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging. The adoption of ASC 815 had no financial impact on the Company’s primary financial statements as it only required additional footnote disclosures. The Company has applied the requirements on a prospective basis. Accordingly, disclosures related to periods prior to the date of adoption have not been presented.

 

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the Company’s legal entities’ monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functionalcurrencies other than their functional currencies. These foreign currency exposures mainly arise from intercompany transactions by and between the parent company and its various foreign subsidiaries. The Company does not designate its forward exchange contracts as hedging instruments, and these contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.

The Company’s forward exchange contracts generally have maturities of one month or less and are accounted for under SFAS 133,Accounting for Derivative Instrumentsclosed out and Hedging Activitiesrolled over into new contracts at the end of each monthly reporting period. Consequently, the fair value of these contracts has historically not been significant at the end of each reporting period.. Typically, realized gains and losses on theseforward exchange contracts, which arise as a result of closing out the contracts at the end of each reporting period, are substantially offset by transactionrevaluation losses and gains on the underlying balances being hedged. During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, netdenominated in non-functional currencies. However, an inaccurate forecast of foreign currency (losses) gains relating to these arrangements were $(1.0) million, $(1.3) millionassets or liabilities, coupled with a currency movement, would result in a gain or loss on a net basis. Gains and $(0.9) million, respectively. These amounts were recordedlosses on forward exchange contracts and from revaluation of the underlying asset and liability balances denominated in non-functional currencies are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings in selling, general and administrative expenses.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

From time to time,NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company also entersrecognized net foreign currency (losses) and gains of $(0.4) million, $2.1 million and $(1.0) million, respectively.

Other than foreign exchange forward contracts, the Company has no other freestanding or embedded derivative instruments, although the Company may use other derivative instruments in the future. The Company has not entered into forward exchange contracts for speculative or trading purposes.

As of October 2, 2009, the Company had foreign exchange forward contracts to minimizepurchase the impactU.S. dollar equivalent of $60.6 million and to sell the U.S. dollar equivalent of $11.6 million in various foreign currency fluctuations on forecasted transactions. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. There were no outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions as of September 28, 2007 or September 29, 2006. In addition, no foreign exchange gains or losses from hedge ineffectiveness were recognized during fiscal years 2007, 2006 or 2005.currencies.

The Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts generally range from one to 12 months in original maturity. A summary follows of all foreign exchange forward contracts that were outstanding as of September 28, 2007:

   Notional
Value
Sold
  Notional
Value
Purchased

(in thousands)

    

Euro

  $  $97,956

Australian dollar

      37,100

Japanese yen

   4,148   

Canadian dollar

   3,596   

British pound

      2,102

Danish krone

   1,180   
        

Total

  $  8,924  $  137,158
        

 

Note 6.    Acquisitions

 

During fiscal year 2006,2008, the Company acquired PL International LimitedOxford Diffraction Ltd. (“Polymer Labs”Oxford Diffraction”) and IonSpec Corporation (“IonSpec”certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Analogix, Inc. (the “Analogix Business”), both of which became part of the Scientific Instruments segment. Including contingent consideration payments, the Company has paidOxford Diffraction was acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $47.1$39.0 million for Polymer Labsthrough October 2, 2009. Of this amount, a total of $4.5 million is being held in escrow and $17.3 million for IonSpec through September 28, 2007.

Duringis due to be released to the sellers, net of any indemnification claims, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company2010. The Analogix Business was acquired Magnex Scientific Limited (“Magnex”), which became part of the Scientific Instruments segment. Including contingent consideration payments, the Company has paidfor an aggregate purchase price of $34.3$13.0 million for Magnex through September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009. Of this amount, $1.3 million was retained by the Company and will become payable, net of any indemnification claims, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.

 

None of the acquisitions made during fiscal years 2006 or 2005 wereyear 2008 was material on either an individual or an aggregated basis. As a result, pro forma sales, earnings from operations, net earnings and net earnings per share have not been presented. However, the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings for both fiscal years 2007, 20062009 and 20052008 include the results of operations of the acquired companies described above since the effective dates of their respective purchases. Except for Magnex, there were no significant differences between the accounting policies of the Company and any of the acquired companies.

 

Contingent Consideration Arrangements.    The Company is, from time to time, obligated to pay additional cash purchase price amounts in the event that certain financial or operational milestones are met by acquired businesses. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, up to a maximum of $37.2$10.1 million could be payable

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

through February 2009April 2011 under contingent consideration arrangements relating to acquired businesses. Amounts subject to these arrangements can be earned over the respective measurement period, depending on the performance of the acquired business relative to certain financial and/or operational targets.

 

The following table summarizes key terms of outstanding contingent consideration arrangements as of September 28, 2007:October 2, 2009:

 

Acquired business

Remaining

amount

available

(maximum)Company/Business

  Remaining
Amount
Available
(maximum)
Measurement period
Period
  Measurement period end datePeriod End Date
(in millions

IonSpecOxford Diffraction

  $    7.014.0 million 3 years  February 2009April 2011

MagnexAnalogix Business

  $      2.84.0 million 3 years  November 2007December 2010

Polymer LabsOther

      0.32 yearsJuly 2010

Total

  $19.2 million  10.1  3 years  November 2008

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

Subsequent Event.    On November 11, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Analogix, Inc. (the “Analogix Business”) for approximately $11 million in cash plus assumed net debt, subject to certain net asset adjustments. Under the terms of the acquisition, the Company might make additional purchase price payments of up to $4 million over a three-year period, depending on the performance of the Analogix Business and certain operational milestones. The Analogix Business designs, manufactures, markets, sells and services consumables and instrumentation for automated compound purification using flash chromatography, and became part of the Scientific Instruments segment.NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 7.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for each of the Company’s reportable segments in fiscal years 20072009 and 20062008 follow:

 

   Scientific
Instruments
  Vacuum
Technologies
  Total

(in thousands)

      

Balance as of September 30, 2005

  $148,968  $966  $149,934

Fiscal year 2006 acquisitions

   27,190           —   27,190

Contingent payments on prior years’ acquisitions

   2,386      2,386

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   2,053      2,053
            

Balance as of September 29, 2006

   180,597   966   181,563

Contingent payments on prior years’ acquisitions

   4,115      4,115

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   8,082      8,082
            

Balance as of September 28, 2007

  $  192,794  $  966  $  193,760
            

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   

Scientific
Instruments

  

Vacuum
Technologies

  Total
Company
 

(in thousands)

     

Balance as of September 28, 2007

  $192,794   $966  $193,760  

Fiscal year 2008 acquisitions

   29,712       29,712  

Contingent payments on prior-years acquisitions

   4,057       4,057  

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   (9,321     (9,321
             

Balance as of October 3, 2008

   217,242    966   218,208  

Contingent payments on prior-years acquisitions

   1,861       1,861  

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   (3,846     (3,846
             

Balance as of October 2, 2009

  $  215,257   $  966  $  216,223  
             

 

The following intangible assets have been recorded and are being amortized by the Company:

 

  September 28, 2007  October 2, 2009
  Gross  Accumulated
Amortization
 Net  Gross  Accumulated
Amortization
 Net

(in thousands)

          

Intangible assets

          

Existing technology

  $16,611  $(8,235) $8,376  $16,244  $(11,738 $4,506

Patents and core technology

   29,908   (10,752)  19,156   38,515   (17,349  21,166

Trade names and trademarks

   2,458   (1,623)  835   2,400   (2,120  280

Customer lists

   11,866   (9,408)  2,458   12,996   (11,173  1,823

Other

   3,025   (2,278)  747   3,227   (2,668  559
                  

Total

  $  73,382  $  (45,048)   $  28,334
  $  63,868  $  (32,296) $  31,572         
         

 

  September 29, 2006  October 3, 2008
  Gross  Accumulated
Amortization
 Net  Gross  Accumulated
Amortization
 Net

(in thousands)

          

Intangible assets

          

Existing technology

  $15,054  $(5,726) $9,328  $16,503  $(9,699 $6,804

Patents and core technology

   29,321   (6,573)  22,748   40,680   (14,253  26,427

Trade names and trademarks

   2,419   (1,209)  1,210   2,425   (1,946  479

Customer lists

   11,325   (6,783)  4,542   13,090   (10,278  2,812

Other

   2,823   (1,508)  1,315   2,972   (2,522  450
                  

Total

  $  75,670  $(38,698 $  36,972
  $  60,942  $  (21,799) $  39,143         
         

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Actual aggregate amortization expense relating to intangible assets recorded in the three most recent fiscal years as well as estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years and thereafter follow:

 

(in thousands)     

Actual amortization expense

    

Fiscal year 2005

  $6,600

Fiscal year 2006

  $8,468

Fiscal year 2007

  $8,141  $8,141
   

Fiscal year 2008

  $8,553
   

Fiscal year 2009

  $7,345
   

Estimated amortization expense

    

Fiscal year 2008

  $7,241

Fiscal year 2009

   6,183

Fiscal year 2010

   5,678  $7,140

Fiscal year 2011

   3,203   5,029

Fiscal year 2012

   2,373   4,074

Fiscal year 2013

   3,545

Fiscal year 2014

   3,361

Thereafter

   6,894   5,185
      

Total

  $  31,572  $28,334
      

 

Note 8.    Restructuring Costs

 

Summary of Restructuring Plans.    Between fiscal years 2003 and 2007, theThe Company has committed to several restructuring plans in order to adjust its organizational structure, improve operational efficiencies, centralize functions, reallocate resources and eliminate redundant or excess costs resulting from acquisitions or dispositions during those periods.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)reduce operating costs.

 

The following tables setsset forth changes in the Company’s aggregate liability relating to all ongoing restructuring plans (including the Fiscal Year 2007 Plan2009 Plans described below) during fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 as well as total restructuring expense and other related costs recorded since the inception of those plans:

 

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

    

Balance at October 1, 2004

  $1,673  $830  $2,503 

Charges to expense, net

   4,019   1,922   5,941 

Cash payments

   (4,553)  (992)  (5,545)

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   (137)  (68)  (205)
             

Balance at September 30, 2005

   1,002   1,692   2,694 

Charges to expense, net

   3   (38)  (35)

Cash payments

   (772)  (814)  (1,586)

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

      (22)  (22)
             

Balance at September 29, 2006

   233   818   1,051 

Charges to expense, net

   2,321      2,321 

Cash payments

   (393)  (127)  (520)

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   61   16   77 
             

Balance at September 28, 2007

  $2,222  $707  $2,929 
             

Total expense since inception of plans

    

(in millions)

    

Restructuring expense

 

 $17.6 
       

Other-related costs(1)

 

 $5.4 
       

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

    

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $233   $818   $1,051  

Charges to expense, net

   2,321        2,321  

Cash payments

   (393  (127  (520

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   61    16    77  
             

Balance at September 28, 2007

   2,222    707    2,929  

Charges to expense, net

   1,291    761    2,052  

Cash payments

   (1,702  (408  (2,110

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   29    (16  13  
             

Balance at October 3, 2008

   1,840    1,044    2,884  

Charges to (reversal of) expense, net

   6,283    (296  5,987  

Cash payments

   (7,768  (294  (8,062

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   224    (56  168  
             

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $579   $398   $977  
             

Total expense since inception of plans

    

(in millions)

    

Restructuring expense

  

 $12.2  
    

Other restructuring-related costs(1)

  

 $9.9  
    

(1) These costs related primarily to employee retention and relocation costs and accelerated depreciation of assets disposed upon the closure of facilities. Of the $5.4$9.9 million in other related costs, $2.0$3.7 million, $0.2$3.4 million and $1.0$2.0 million was recorded in fiscal yearyears 2009, 2008 and 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Fiscal Year 20072009 Second Quarter Plan.    During the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal year 2007,2009, the Company committed to a plan to combinereduce its cost structure, primarily through headcount reductions, due to continuing uncertainties in the global economic environment. The plan primarily involved the elimination of approximately 240 regular employees (primarily in North America and optimize the development and assembly of most of its NMR and mass spectrometry products, to further centralize related administration and other functionsEurope and, to reallocate certain resources toward more rapidly growing product linesa lesser extent, Asia Pacific and geographies. As part ofLatin America) and 80 temporary positions in both the Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies segments. In addition, the plan included the Company is creating an information rich detection (“IRD”) centerclosure of one small research and development/manufacturing facility in Walnut Creek, California, where NMR operations currently locatedNorth America (Lake Forest, California) and two sales offices in Palo Alto, California will be integrated with mass spectrometry operations already located in Walnut Creek. The Company will invest in a new 45,000 square foot buildingEurope (Sweden and a substantial remodel of an existing building there to house the IRD center.Switzerland).

 

As a result of the plan, a number of employee positions have been or will be relocated or eliminated and certain facilities will be consolidated. These actions primarily impact the Scientific Instruments segment and involve the elimination of between approximately 40 and 60 positions. The Company expects these activities to be completed during the first half of fiscal year 2009.

Restructuring and other relatedrestructuring costs associated with this plan include one-time termination benefits for employees whose positions were eliminated and lease termination costs on vacated facilities. Other restructuring-related costs include employee retention payments,and relocation costs, to relocate facilities (including decommissioning costs, movingfacility-related relocation costs and temporary facility/storage costs), accelerated depreciation of fixed assets to be disposed asupon the closure of facilities. These costs are being recorded and included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses.

The following table sets forth changes in the Company’s restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal year 2009:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

    

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $   $   $  

Charges to expense, net

   6,073    21    6,094  

Cash payments

   (5,892  (12  (5,904

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   197    1    198  
             

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $378   $10   $388  
             

Total expense since inception of plan

    

(in millions)

    

Restructuring expense

  

 $6.1  
    

Other restructuring-related costs

  

 $0.9  
    

The restructuring expense of $6.1 million recorded during fiscal year 2009 related to employee termination benefits, of which $5.5 million impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and $0.6 million impacted the Vacuum Technologies segment. The $0.9 million in other restructuring-related costs incurred during fiscal year 2009 were comprised of $0.1 million in employee-related costs which impacted the Vacuum Technologies segment and $0.5 million in employee-related costs and a result$0.3 million non-cash charge for accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities, actionswhich impacted the Scientific Instruments segment. These costs are expected to be settled by the end of fiscal year 2010.

Fiscal Year 2009 First Quarter Plan.    During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company committed to a separate plan to reduce its employee headcount in order to reduce operating costs and leaseincrease margins. The plan involved the termination costs.of approximately 30 employees, mostly located in Europe. The restructuring costs related to this plan primarily consist of one-time termination benefits, which are expected to be settled by the end of fiscal year 2010. This restructuring plan did not involve any non-cash components. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan have been included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table sets forth changes in the Company’s restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal year 2007:2009:

 

  Employee-
Related
 Facilities-
Related
  Total   Employee-
Related
 Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

          

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $  $ —  $ 

Charges

   2,301      2,301 

Balance at October 3, 2008

  $   $        —  $  

Charges to expense, net

   1,354       1,354  

Cash payments

   (145)     (145)   (1,309     (1,309

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   66      66    39       39  
                    

Balance at September 28, 2007

  $2,222  $ —  $2,222 

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $84   $        —  $84  
                    

Total expense since inception of plan

          

(in millions)

          

Restructuring expense

Restructuring expense

  $2.3      $1.4  
           

Other-related costs

  $2.0 

Other restructuring-related costs

     $0.1  
           

 

The restructuring expense of $1.4 million recorded during fiscal year 2009 related to employee termination benefits, of which $1.2 million impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and $0.2 million impacted the Vacuum Technologies segment. The Company also incurred $0.1 million in other employee-related costs during the period which impacted the Scientific Instruments segment.

Fiscal Year 2007 Plan.    During fiscal year 2007, the Company committed to a plan to combine and optimize the development and assembly of most of its nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) and mass spectrometry products, to further centralize related administration and other functions and to reallocate certain resources toward more rapidly growing product lines and geographies. As part of the plan, the Company created an information rich detection (“IRD”) center in Walnut Creek, California, where NMR operations that were previously located in Palo Alto, California were integrated with mass spectrometry operations already located in Walnut Creek. The Company is investing in a substantial remodel of an existing building and invested in a new 45,000 square foot building there to house the IRD center.

As a result of the plan, a number of employee positions were relocated or eliminated and certain facilities were consolidated. These actions primarily impacted the Scientific Instruments segment and involved the elimination of between approximately 40 and 60 positions.

Restructuring and other related costs associated with this plan include one-time termination benefits, retention and relocation payments, costs to relocate facilities (including decommissioning costs, moving costs and temporary facility/storage costs), accelerated depreciation of fixed assets to be disposed as a result of facilities actions and lease termination costs. These costs are currently estimated to be between $12.5 million and $15.0 million, of which $1.3 million was incurred in fiscal year 2009, $5.5 million was incurred in fiscal year 2008 and $4.3 million was incurred in fiscal year 2007. The estimated remaining costs are expected to be recorded and settled through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. Costs relating to restructuring activities recorded under this plan have been included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table sets forth changes in the Company’s restructuring liability relating to the foregoing plan during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007:

   Employee-
Related
  Facilities-
Related
  Total 

(in thousands)

    

Balance at September 29, 2006

  $   $   $  

Charges to expense, net

   2,301        2,301  

Cash payments

   (145      (145

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   66        66  
             

Balance at September 28, 2007

   2,222        2,222  

Charges to expense, net

   1,291    761    2,052  

Cash payments

   (1,702  (252  (1,954

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   29    42    71  
             

Balance at October 3, 2008

   1,840    551    2,391  

Reversals of expense, net

   (1,144  (317  (1,461

Cash payments

   (567  (220  (787

Foreign currency impacts and other adjustments

   (12  (14  (26
             

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $117   $   $117  
             

Total expense since inception of plan

    

(in millions)

    

Restructuring expense

  

 $2.9  
    

Other restructuring-related costs

  

 $8.2  
    

The net reversals of restructuring expense of $1.5 million recorded during fiscal year 2009 related to changes in estimates of certain employee termination benefits and the early cancellation of a lease agreement for a vacated facility. The restructuring charges of $2.1 million and $2.3 million recorded during fiscal yearyears 2008 and 2007, respectively related to employee termination benefits.benefits and costs associated with the closure of leased facilities. The other-relatedCompany also incurred other restructuring-related costs of $2.8 million, $3.4 million and $2.0 million recorded during fiscal yearyears 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These costs were comprised of a $0.7 millionrelated to employee retention costs and facilities-related costs including decommissioning costs and non-cash chargecharges for accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed upon the closure of facilities, $0.8 million in employee retention costs and $0.5 million in other facility-related costs.facilities.

 

Note 9.    Warranty and Indemnification Obligations

 

Product Warranties.    The Company’s products are generally subject to warranties. Liabilities for the estimated future costs of repair or replacement are established and charged to cost of sales at the time the related sale is recognized. The amount of liability to be recorded is based on management’s best estimates of future warranty costs after considering historical and projected product failure rates and product repair costs. Changes in the Company’s estimated liability for product warranty during fiscal years 20072009 and 20062008 follow:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 

(in thousands)

      

Beginning balance

  $11,042  $10,723   $13,867   $12,454  

Charges to costs and expenses

   5,456   5,036    20,665    22,184  

Warranty expenditures

   (4,044)  (4,717)

Warranty expenditures and other adjustments

   (21,259  (21,869

Acquired warranty liabilities

       1,098  
              

Ending balance

  $12,454  $11,042   $13,273   $13,867  
              

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Indemnification Obligations.    FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45,ASC 460,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, requires a guarantor to recognize a liability for and/or disclose obligations it has undertaken in relation to the issuance of the guarantee. Under this guidance, arrangements involving indemnification clauses are subject to the disclosure requirements of FIN 45ASC 460 only.

 

The Company is subject to certain indemnification obligations to VMS (formerly VAI) and VSEA in connection with the Instruments business as conducted by VAI prior to the Distribution (described in Note 1). These indemnification obligations cover a variety of aspects of the Company’s business, including, but not limited to, employee, tax, intellectual property, litigation and environmental matters. Certain of the agreements containing these indemnification obligations are disclosed as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is not considered to be material.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company is subject to certain indemnification obligations to Jabil in connection with the Company’s sale of its Electronics Manufacturing Business to Jabil. These indemnification obligations cover certain aspects of the Company’s conduct of the Electronics Manufacturing Business prior to its sale to Jabil, including, but not limited to, employee, tax, litigation and environmental matters. The agreement containing these indemnification obligations is disclosed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is not considered to be material.

 

The Company’s By-Laws require it to indemnify its officers and directors, as well as those who act as directors and officers of other entities at the request of the Company, against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any proceedings arising out of their services to the Company. In addition, the Company has entered into separate indemnity agreements with each director and officer that provide for indemnification of these directors and officers under certain circumstances. The form of these indemnity agreements is disclosed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The indemnification obligations are more fully described in these indemnity agreements and the Company’s By-Laws. The Company purchases insurance to cover claims or a portion of any claims made against its directors and officers. Since a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated in the Company’s By-Laws or these indemnity agreements and will depend on the facts and circumstances that arise out of any future claims, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot reasonably be estimated. Historically, the Company has not made payments related to these indemnification obligations and the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is not considered to be material.

 

As is customary in the Company’s industry and as provided for in local law in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, many of the Company’s standard contracts provide remedies to customers and other third parties with whom the Company enters into contracts, such as defense, settlement or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of its products. From time to time, the Company also agrees to indemnify customers, suppliers, contractors, lessors, lessees and others with whom it enters into contracts, against loss, expense and/or liability arising from various triggering events related to the sale and the use of the Company’s products and services, the use of their goods and services, the use of facilities and other matters covered by such contracts, usually up to a specified maximum amount. In addition, from time to time, the Company sometimes also agrees to indemnify these parties against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability or environmental obligations. Claims made under such indemnification obligations have been insignificant and the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is not considered to be material.

 

Note 10.    Debt and Credit Facilities

 

Credit FacilitiesFacilities..    The Company maintains relationships with banks in many countries from whom it sometimes obtains bank guarantees and short-term standby letters of credit. These guarantees and letters of credit relate primarily to advance payments and deposits made to the Company’s subsidiaries by customers

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

for which separate liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, a total of $13.9$14.5 million of these bank guarantees and letters of credit were outstanding. No amounts had been drawn by beneficiaries under these or any other outstanding guarantees or letters of credit as of that date.

 

Long-term DebtDebt..    As of September 28, 2007,both October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, the Company had a $25.0an $18.8 million term loan outstanding with a U.S. financial institution compared to $27.5 million at September 29, 2006. As of September 28, 2007, thea fixed interest rate on the term loan wasof 6.7%. As of September 29, 2006, fixed interest rates on the term loan ranged from 6.7% to 7.2% with a weighted average of 6.8%. The term loan contains certain covenants that limit future borrowings and the payment of cash dividends and require the maintenance of certain levels of working capital and operating results. The Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants of the term loan agreement at September 28, 2007.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)October 2, 2009.

 

The following table summarizes future principal payments on borrowings under long-term debt outstanding as of September 28, 2007:October 2, 2009:

 

  Fiscal Years    Fiscal Years Total
  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  Thereafter  Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Thereafter 

(in thousands)

                     

Long-term debt (including current portion)

  $  6,250  $       —  $  6,250  $       —  $  6,250  $  6,250  $  25,000 $    6,250 $         — $    6,250 $         — $    6,250 $         — $  18,750
                                   

Based upon rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities, the carrying amount of long-term debt approximates the estimated fair value.

 

Note 11.    Operating Lease Commitments

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, the Company was committed to minimum rentals for certain facilities and other leased assets under long-term non-cancelable operating leases (net of non-cancelable sublease income) as follows:

 

(in thousands)     

Fiscal Year

    

2008

  $8,536

2009

   6,103

2010

   4,018  $6,817

2011

   2,249   5,097

2012

   1,901   2,958

2013

   2,247

2014

   1,713

Thereafter

   5,613   2,052
      

Total

  $28,420  $20,884
      

 

Rent expense for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, 2006was $17.6 million, $17.4 million and 2005, was $16.1 million, $14.9 million and $13.2 million, respectively.

 

Note 12.    Retirement Plans

 

Certain employees of the Company in the U.S. are eligible to participate in the Company’s sponsored, defined contribution retirement plan. For employee contributions made after certain minimum employment conditions have been met, the Company is obligated to match the participant’s contribution up to 6% of their eligible compensation. Participants are entitled, upon termination or retirement, to receive their account balances, which are held by a third partythird-party trustee. The Company has no defined benefit plans in the U.S. In addition to the U.S. retirement plan, a number of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries have retirement plans for regular full-time employees. SeveralAlthough most of thesethe plans are defined contribution plans, several of them are defined benefit plans. Total expenses for all retirement plans amounted to $11.9$11.8 million, $11.1$13.0 million and $10.8$12.5 million for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As discussed more fully below, the Company also recorded a defined benefit pension plan settlement loss of approximately $1.5 million in fiscal year 2005.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As of September 28, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 158,ASC 715-30,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Plans—Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognizeIn accordance with this accounting standard, the Company recognizes the funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans (other than multiemployer plans) as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheet and recognizerecognizes changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS 158 also requires the measurement date of the plans funded status to be the same as a company’s fiscal year-end.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The adoption of SFAS 158 with respect to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans had the following incremental effect on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 28, 2007:

   September 28, 2007
   

Before

Application of
SFAS 158

  Adjustment  After
Application of
SFAS 158

(in thousands)

      

Long-term assets

  $586  $3,329  $3,915

Deferred tax assets

  $449  $73  $522

Current liability

  $19  $  $19

Long-term liability

  $8,270  $4,723  $12,993

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  $  1,126  $  1,321  $    2,447

 

The components of the amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 28, 2007October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008 were as follows:

 

  

Sept. 28,

2007

   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 

(in thousands)

     

Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (before taxes of $522)

  

Components of accumulated other comprehensive income
(before taxes of $611 and $261 in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively)

   

Prior service costs

  $204   $   $179  

Transition asset

   (40)

Transition assets

   (19  (28

Net actuarial loss

   2,805    2,964    2,089  

Foreign currency changes and other adjustments

   1,533    647  
           

Total

  $  2,969   $  4,478   $  2,887  
           

 

The portion of this amount expected to be amortized into net periodic pension cost in fiscal year 20082010 is not significant.

 

Changes in the projected benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and funded status relating to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans follows:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
 Sept. 30,
2005
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 

(in thousands)

        

Change in projected benefit obligation

        

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of fiscal year

  $52,071  $46,085  $59,286   $47,653   $53,333   $52,071  

Service cost, including plan participant contributions

   1,721   1,680   1,490    856    1,573    1,721  

Interest cost

   2,601   2,138   2,190    2,528    2,957    2,601  

Actuarial (gain) loss

   (6,110)  (150)  9,800 

Actuarial loss (gain)

   2,606    (5,367  (6,110

Foreign currency changes

   4,161   3,047   181    (1,573  (3,749  4,161  

Benefit payments

   (1,111)  (729)  (632)   (1,483  (1,094  (1,111

Settlement

         (26,230)
                    

Projected benefit obligation at end of fiscal year

  $53,333  $52,071  $46,085   $50,587   $47,653   $53,333  
                    

Change in fair value of plan assets and funded status

        

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of fiscal year

  $37,279  $31,786  $51,405   $39,304   $44,236   $37,279  

Actual return on plan assets

   3,163   2,471   3,782    3,016    (2,731  3,163  

Employer and plan participant contributions

   1,617   1,592   2,779    842    1,762    1,617  

Foreign currency changes

   3,288   2,159   648    (1,093  (2,869  3,288  

Benefit and expense payments

   (1,111)  (729)  (598)   (1,483  (1,094  (1,111

Settlement

         (26,230)
                    

Fair value of plan assets at end of fiscal year

   44,236   37,279   31,786    40,586    39,304    44,236  

Projected benefit obligation at end of fiscal year

   (53,333)  (52,071)  (46,085)   (50,587  (47,653  (53,333
                    

Projected benefit obligation in excess of fair value of plan assets

   (9,097)  (14,792)  (14,299)   (10,001  (8,349  (9,097

Unrecognized prior service cost

      142   143              

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

      10,023   10,758              
                    

Net accrued benefit cost at end of fiscal year

  $(9,097) $(4,627) $(3,398)  $(10,001 $(8,349 $(9,097
                    

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Additional information pertaining to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans as of the end of fiscal years 20072009 and 20062008 is outlined below:

 

  Fiscal Year End 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 

(dollars in thousands)

      

Amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet

      

Prepaid benefit cost

  $  $600 

Accrued benefit cost

      (10,503)

Intangible assets

      236 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

      5,040 

Other (long-term) assets

   3,915      $4,075   $5,241  

Current liabilities

   (19)      (4  (22

Other (long-term) liabilities

   (12,993)      (14,072  (13,568
              

Net accrued benefit cost at end of fiscal year

  $(9,097) $(4,627)  $(10,001 $(8,349
              

Accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans

  $48,477  $44,944   $49,764   $42,974  
              

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

      

Discount rate

   5.5%  4.8%   5.4  6.0

Rate of compensation increases

   3.6%  4.1%   2.6  3.5

Weighted-average asset allocations by asset category

      

Equity securities

   48%  49%   39  35

Debt securities

   42   41    49    52  

Cash

   2   2    3    3  

Real estate

   1   1    1    2  

Other

   7   7    8    8  
              

Total

   100%  100%   100  100
              

Additional information

      

Decrease in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income after tax

  $(2,504) $(106)

Increase in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income after tax

  $2,097   $965  
              

 

Information relating to defined benefit pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets follows:

 

  Fiscal Year End
  Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008

(in thousands)

        

Projected benefit obligation

  $42,302  $41,267  $  38,143  $  37,367

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $37,446  $34,140  $37,320  $32,688

Fair value of plan assets

  $  29,289  $  23,971  $24,067  $23,777

 

Net Periodic Pension Cost.    Net periodic pension cost for defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with SFAS 87,Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, as amended,ASC 715-30 and is made up of several components that reflect different aspects of the Company’s pension-related financial arrangements and the cost of benefits earned by participating employees. These components are determined using certain actuarial assumptions.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The components of the Company’s net periodic pension cost relating to defined benefit pension plans and the weighted-average assumptions used to determine that cost follow:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
 Sept. 30,
2005
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 

(dollars in thousands)

        

Components of net periodic pension cost

        

Service cost, net of plan participant contributions

  $1,387  $1,331  $1,186   $709   $1,232   $1,387  

Interest cost

   2,601   2,138   2,190    2,528    2,957    2,601  

Expected return on plan assets

   (2,126)  (1,702)  (1,959)   (1,931  (2,657  (2,126

Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial gains and losses

   460   522   148 

Settlement loss

         1,477 

Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial (gains) and losses

   (69  (3  460  

Curtailment loss recognized

   148          
                    

Net periodic pension cost

  $  2,322  $  2,289  $  3,042   $1,385   $1,529   $2,322  
                    

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost

        

Discount rate

   4.8%  4.6%  5.5%   6.0  5.5  4.8

Expected return on plan assets

   5.4%  5.2%  6.2%   5.7  5.8  5.4

Rate of compensation increases

   4.1%  3.9%  3.7%   3.5  3.6  4.1

 

Basis for Assumptions.    The Company utilizes yields on country-specific, long-term Corporate AA bond indices (typically 10- or 15-year indices based on the expected timing of benefit payments) as the basis for its discount rate assumptions for each of its defined benefit pension plans. With regard to the expected return assumption, plan assets in most countries are invested in low-risk, long-term fixed income investments such as direct insurance policies and guaranteed insurance contracts. For these asset types, the expected rate of return is established either by reference to yields on comparable long-term corporate bond indices in that country or the return guaranteed by the issuer of the investment security (net of expenses). The exception to this is in the United Kingdom, where the majority of plan assets are invested in equity securities, with the remainder invested typically in corporate bonds, real estate and cash. Due to the nature of these investments, long-term money and corporate bond yields and an implied equity risk premium are considered in establishing the asset return assumption for the defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom.

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plan SettlementCurtailment..    During fiscal year 2005,2009, the Company settledceased future benefit accruals to its defined benefit pension plan in Australia, which resulted inthe United Kingdom. In connection with this action, the Company recorded a corresponding settlementcurtailment loss of approximately $1.5 million. This amount offset approximately $1.5$0.1 million in gains recorded during fiscal year 2004 related to the curtailments of the same plan in Australia as well as a defined benefit pension plan in the Netherlands.2009.

 

Employer Contributions.    During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007,2009, the Company made contributions totaling approximately $1.2$0.7 million to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company currently anticipates contributing an additional $1.4$0.3 million to its remaining defined benefit pension plans in fiscal year 2008, primarily in the United Kingdom.2010.

 

Estimated Future Benefit Payments.    As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, benefit payments, which reflect expected future service (as appropriate), are expected to be as follows:

 

(in millions)     

Fiscal Year

    

2008

  $  0.9

2009

  $1.0

2010

  $1.1  $  0.9

2011

  $1.2  $1.0

2012

  $1.4  $1.0

2013-2016

  $9.8

2013

  $1.1

2014

  $1.2

2015-2019

  $8.1

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Other Postretirement Benefits.    At the Distribution (described in Note 1), the Company assumed responsibility for certain post-employment and post-retirementpostretirement benefits for active employees of the Company; the responsibility for all others, principally retirees of VAI, remained with VMS, although the Company is obligated to reimburse VMS for certain costs relating to certain VAI retirees. The Company’s portion of assets and liabilities as well as related expenses for shared post-employment and post-retirementpostretirement benefits which are not material, have been included in these Consolidated Financial Statements. As of both October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, the Company had accrued $0.9 million in current liabilities relating to these obligations. The Company also had accrued $6.4 million as of October 2, 2009 and $5.6 million as of October 3, 2008, in other non-current liabilities relating to these obligations.

 

Note 13.    Contingencies

 

Environmental Matters.    The Company’s operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws in the U.S. as well as laws in other countries regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. These regulations increase the costs and potential liabilities of the Company’s operations. However, the Company does not currently anticipate that its compliance with these regulations will have a material effect on the Company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

The Company and VSEA are each obligated (under the terms of the Distribution described in Note 1) to indemnify VMS for one-third of certain costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceedsrecoveries and tax benefits recognized or realized by VMS for such costs) relating to (a) environmental matters. In that regard, VMS has been namedinvestigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities at certain facilities previously operated by theVAI and third-party claims made in connection with environmental conditions at those facilities, and (b) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or third parties asthird-party claims alleging that VAI or VMS is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended at ten(“CERCLA”) in connection with certain sites whereto which VAI is alleged to haveallegedly shipped manufacturing waste for recycling, treatment or disposal. In addition,disposal (the “CERCLA sites”). With respect to the facilities formerly operated by VAI, VMS is overseeing and, as applicable, reimbursing third parties forthe environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities, in most cases under the direction of or in consultation with federal, state and/or local agencies, inand handling third-party claims. VMS is also handling claims relating to the U.S. at certain current VMS or former VAI facilities. The Company and VSEA are each obligated to indemnify VMS for one-third of these environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds and taxes).CERCLA sites.

 

For certain of these sites and facilities, variousVarious uncertainties make it difficult to assessestimate future costs for certain of these environmental-related activities, specifically external legal expenses, VMS’ internal oversight costs, third-party claims and a former VAI facility where the likelihood and scope of further environmental-related activities orare difficult to estimate the future costs of such activities if undertaken.assess. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, it was nonetheless estimated that the Company’s share of the future exposure for these environmental-related costs for these sites and facilities ranged in the aggregate from $1.1$1.0 million to $2.7 million (without discounting to present value).$2.6 million. The time frame over which these costs are expected to be incurred varies with each site and facility,type of cost, ranging from one year up to 5approximately 30 years as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009. No amount in the foregoing range of estimated future costs is discounted, and no amount in the range is believed to be more probable of being incurred than any other amount in such range and therange. The Company therefore had an accrual of $1.1$1.0 million as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009 for these future environmental-related costs.

 

As to certain sites and facilities, sufficientSufficient knowledge has been gained to be able to better estimate the scope and certainother costs offor future environmental-related activities. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, it was estimated that the Company’s share of the future exposurecosts for these environmental-related costs for these sites and facilitiesactivities ranged in the aggregate from $3.1$2.6 million to $13.0 million (without discounting to present value).$12.7 million. The time frame over which these costs are expected to be incurred varies, with each site and facility, ranging from two years up to 22approximately 30 years as of September 28, 2007.October 2, 2009. As to each of these sites and facilities,ranges of cost estimates, it was determined that a particular amount within the range of certain estimated costs was a better estimate of the future environmental-related cost than any other amount within the range and thatrange. Together, these amounts totaled $5.5 million at October 2, 2009. Because both the amount and timing of the recurring portion of these future costs were reliably determinable. Together, these amounts totaled $6.0 milliondeterminable, that portion is discounted at September 28, 2007.4%, net of inflation. The Company therefore had an accrual of $4.2$4.0 million as of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, which represents theits best estimate of its share of these future environmental-related costs discounted at 4%, net of inflation.after discounting estimated recurring future costs. This accrual is in addition to the $1.1$1.0 million described in the preceding paragraph.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

At September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, the Company’s reserve for environmental-related costs, based upon future environmental-related costs estimated by the Company as of that date, was calculated as follows:

 

  Recurring
Costs
  

Non-

Recurring
Costs

  

Total

Anticipated

Future Costs

   Recurring
Costs
  Non-
Recurring
Costs
  Total
Anticipated
Future Cost
 

(in millions)

            

Fiscal Year

            

2008

  $0.3  $0.2  $0.5 

2009

   0.2   0.2   0.4 

2010

   0.2   0.2   0.4   $  0.4  $  0.4  $0.8  

2011

   0.2   0.3   0.5    0.2   0.4   0.6  

2012

   0.2   0.4   0.6    0.3   0.3   0.6  

2013

   0.2   0.2   0.4  

2014

   0.2   0.2   0.4  

Thereafter

   3.8   0.9   4.7    3.2   0.6   3.8  
                    

Total costs

  $  4.9  $  2.2   7.1   $4.5  $2.1   6.6  
                

Less imputed interest

Less imputed interest

   (1.8)

Less imputed interest

   (1.6
                

Reserve amount

Reserve amount

   5.3 

Reserve amount

   5.0  

Less current portion

Less current portion

   (0.5)

Less current portion

   (0.8
                

Long-term (included in Other liabilities)

Long-term (included in Other liabilities)

  $  4.8 

Long-term (included in Other liabilities)

  $  4.2  
                

 

The foregoing amounts are only estimates of anticipated future environmental-related costs and the amounts actually spent in the years indicated may be greater or less than such estimates. The aggregate range of cost estimates reflects various uncertainties inherent in many environmental investigation, monitoring and remediation activities and the large number of sites where such investigation, monitoring and remediation activities are being undertaken.

 

AnThe Company has not reduced any environmental-related liability in anticipation of recoveries from third parties. However, an insurance company has agreed to pay a portion of certain of VAI’s (now VMS’) future environmental-related costs, for which the Company has an indemnification obligation, and the Company therefore has a long-term receivable of $1.0 million (discounted at 4%, net of inflation) in otherOther assets as of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, for the Company’s share of suchthat insurance recovery. The Company has not reduced any environmental-related liability in anticipation of recoveries from third parties.

 

The Company believes that its reserves for the foregoing and other environmental-related matters are adequate, but as the scope of its obligation becomes more clearly defined, these reserves may be modified and related charges against or credits to earnings may be made. Although any ultimate liability arising from environmental-related matters could result in significant expenditures that, if aggregated and assumed to occur within a single fiscal year, would be material to the Company’s financial statements, the likelihood of such occurrence is considered remote. Based on information currently available and its best assessment of the ultimate amount and timing of environmental-related events, the Company believes that the costs of environmental-related matters are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Legal Proceedings.    The Company is involved in pending legal proceedings that are ordinary, routine and incidental to its business. While the ultimate outcome of these legal matters is not determinable, the Company believes that these matters are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Note 14.    Stockholders’ Equity

 

Stock Rights, Stock Plans and Stock Repurchase Programs

 

On April 2, 1999, stockholders of record of VAI on March 24, 1999 received in the Distribution (described in Note 1) one share of the Company’s common stock for each share of VAI common stock held on April 2, 1999. Each stockholder also received one preferred stock purchase right (“Right”) for each

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

on April 2, 1999. Each stockholder also received one preferred stock purchase right (“Right”) for each share of common stock distributed, entitling the stockholder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, for $200.00 (subject to adjustment), in the event of certain changes in the Company’s ownership. The Participating Preferred Stock iswas designed so that each one one-thousandth of a share hashad economic and voting terms similar to those of one share of common stock. TheDuring the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Rights will expire no later than March 2009.expired. As of September 28, 2007,April 2, 2009, when the Rights had expired, no Rights were eligible to be exercised and none had been exercised through that date.

 

Omnibus Stock Plan.    Effective April 2, 1999, the Company adopted the Omnibus Stock Plan (“OSP”) under which shares of common stock can be issued to officers, directors and employees. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for awards under the OSP was initially 4,200,000 plus 4,512,000 shares granted in substitution for other options in connection with the Distribution (described in Note 1). During fiscal year 2002,has been approved by the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment of the OSP to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the OSP by 1,000,000. During fiscal year 2005, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment of the OSP to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the OSP by an additional 5,000,000.

The OSPand is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. At September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, a total of 4,498,0003,656,000 shares were available for issuance under the OSP.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.    During fiscal year 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) for, which the Company set aside 1,200,000 shares of common stock for issuance. In February 2003,was approved by the Company’s stockholders approved the ESPP.in February 2003. Under the ESPP, eligible Company employees may set aside, through payroll deductions, between 1% and 10% of eligible compensation for purchases of the Company’s common stock. The participants’ purchase price is the lower of 85% of the stock’s market value on the enrollment date or 85% of the stock’s market value on the purchase date. Prior to fiscal year 2006, enrollment dates occurred every six months and purchase dates occurred each quarter. Beginning in fiscal year 2006, the Company reduced the length of each offering period under its ESPP from six months to three months. At October 2, 2009, a total of 46,000 shares were available for issuance under the ESPP.

 

Stock Repurchase Programs.    In February 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program under which the Company was authorized to utilize up to $100 million to repurchase shares of its common stock. This repurchase program is effective through December 31, 2009. During fiscal year 2009, the Company repurchased and retired 344,000 shares under this authorization at an aggregate cost of $7.1 million. During fiscal year 2008, the Company repurchased and retired 1,070,000 shares under this authorization at an aggregate cost of $55.4 million. As of October 2, 2009, the Company had remaining authorization to repurchase $37.5 million of its common stock under this program. However, under the terms of the Merger Agreement with Agilent, the Company is generally prohibited from repurchasing any shares of its common stock without the prior consent of Agilent.

In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program under which the Company is authorized to utilize up to $100 million to repurchase shares of its common stock. This repurchase program iswas effective through December 31, 2008. During fiscal year 2008, the Company repurchased and retired 876,000 shares under this authorization at an aggregate cost of $50.4 million, which completed this repurchase program. During fiscal year 2007, the Company repurchased and retired 862,000 shares under this authorization at an aggregate cost of $49.6 million. As of September 28, 2007, the Company had remaining authorization to repurchase $50.4 million of its common stock under this program.

 

In November 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which the Company was authorized to utilize up to $100 million to repurchase shares of its common stock. This repurchase program was effective through September 30, 2007. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company repurchased and retired 820,000 shares under this authorization at an aggregate cost of $37.0 million, which completed this repurchase program. During fiscal year 2006, the Company repurchased and retired 1,515,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $63.0 million.

 

In February 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $145 million of its common stock. This authorization was conditioned upon the closing of the sale of the Electronics Manufacturing Business,Other Stock Repurchases.    During both fiscal years 2009 and upon becoming effective replaced the prior repurchase authorization approved in May 2004. The sale of the Electronics Manufacturing business closed on March 11, 2005, and the repurchase authorization became effective on that date and replaced the previous (May 2004) repurchase authorization. During fiscal year 2005,2008, the Company repurchased and retired approximately 4.0 million16,000 shares under this program for an aggregate costtendered to it by employees in settlement of approximately $145 million.employee tax withholding obligations due from those employees upon the vesting of restricted stock in each of those respective periods.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In May 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock until September 30, 2007. During fiscal year 2005, the Company repurchased and retired approximately 802,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $33.6 million. During fiscal year 2004, the Company repurchased and retired approximately 192,000 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $7.5 million. As described in the preceding paragraph, this repurchase authorization was replaced upon the closing of the sale of the Electronics Manufacturing Business on March 11, 2005, and the remaining approximately 6,000 shares under this authorization were no longer available for repurchase.

 

Share-Based Compensation

 

Stock Options.    Under the OSP, the Company periodically grants stock options to officers, directors and employees. The exercise price for stock options granted under the OSP may not be less than 100% of the fair market value at the date of the grant. Options granted are exercisable at the times and on the terms established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, but not later than ten years after the date of grant (except in the event of death, after which an option is exercisable for three years). Stock Options granted generally become exercisablevest in cumulativethree equal annual installments of one-third each year commencing one year followingover three years from the date of grant.grant date.

 

The following table summarizes stock optionsoption activity under the OSP for the periods indicated:

 

   Shares  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value(1)
  Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
   (in thousands)     (in millions)  (in years)  (in millions)

Outstanding at October 1, 2004

  3,640  $25.54      

Granted

  512  $36.66      

Exercised

  (806) $18.01      

Cancelled or expired

  (100) $37.21      
           

Outstanding at September 30, 2005

  3,246  $28.80      

Granted

  538  $41.88  $7.0    

Exercised

  (1,225) $24.85      

Cancelled or expired

  (66) $38.99      
           

Outstanding at September 29, 2006

  2,493  $33.30    5.4  $  31.4

Granted

  339  $46.13  $  5.0    

Exercised

  (1,001) $28.12      

Cancelled or expired

  (48) $41.22      
           

Outstanding at September 28, 2007

  1,783  $38.43    5.6  $44.9
           

Exercisable at September 28, 2007

  1,054  $  35.56    4.9  $29.6
           

   Shares  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value(1)
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
   (in thousands)     (in millions)  (in years)  (in millions)

Outstanding at September 29, 2006

  2,493   $  33.30    5.4  $  31.4

Granted

  339   $  46.13  $  5.0    

Exercised

  (1,001 $  28.12      

Cancelled or expired

  (48 $  41.22      
           

Outstanding at September 28, 2007

  1,783   $  38.43    5.6  $  44.9

Granted

  301   $  66.71  $  5.9    

Exercised

  (410 $  35.07      

Cancelled or expired

  (14 $  59.04      
           

Outstanding at October 3, 2008

  1,660   $  44.21    5.7  $  24.0

Granted

  334   $  35.44  $  3.6    

Exercised

  (151 $  30.13      

Cancelled or expired

  (57 $  43.15      
           

Outstanding at October 2, 2009

  1,786   $  43.80    5.8  $  17.6
           

Exercisable at October 2, 2009

  1,191   $  42.20    4.4  $  12.2
           

(1) After estimated forfeitures.

 

The intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal yearyears 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $2.1 million, $11.4 million and 2006 was $26.2 million, respectively.

Share-based compensation expense related to stock options was $4.8 million, $5.5 million and $21.8$6.7 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of October 2, 2009, the unrecognized share-based compensation balance related to stock options was $3.3 million. This amount will be recognized as expense using the straight-line attribution method over the remaining weighted-average amortization period of 1.2 years.

 

Restricted (Nonvested) Stock.    Under the OSP, the Company also periodically grants restricted (nonvested) common stock to employees. Such grants are valued using the quoted market value of the underlying common stock as of the grant date. These amounts areThe fair value of these shares is then recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense ratably over their respective vesting periods, which range from one to three years.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table summarizes restricted (nonvested) common stock activity under the OSP for the periods indicated:

 

   Shares  Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  

Aggregate

Grant Date

Fair Value

   (in thousands)     (in millions)

Outstanding and unvested at October 1, 2004

       

Granted

          25  $36.18  $0.9
       

Outstanding and unvested at September 30, 2005

  25  $36.18  

Granted

  27  $42.51  $1.2
       

Outstanding and unvested at September 29, 2006

      52  $39.51  
       

Granted

          59  $47.83  $  2.8
       

Outstanding and unvested at September 28, 2007

          111  $  43.92  
       
   Shares  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value
   (in thousands)     (in millions)

Outstanding at September 29, 2006

      52   $  39.51  

Granted

  59   $  47.83  $  2.8
       

Outstanding at September 28, 2007

  111   $  43.92  

Granted

  46   $  67.55  $  3.1

Vested(2)

  (52 $  43.48  
       

Outstanding at October 3, 2008

  105   $  54.51  

Granted(1)

  122   $  24.18  $  2.9

Vested(2)

  (68 $  50.76  

Forfeited

  (3 $  53.56  
       

Outstanding at October 2, 2009

  156   $  32.51  
       

(1)Includes 63,000 shares for which vesting is subject to both a performance condition and continued service.
(2)Includes shares tendered to the Company by employees in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations.

The fair value of restricted stock that vested in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was $2.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively. There was no restricted stock that vested in fiscal year 2007.

 

Share-based compensation expense related to restricted (nonvested) common stock was $2.2$1.9 million, $0.6$2.9 million and $0.2$2.2 million in fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, respectively. As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, there was $1.8$2.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted (nonvested) common stock granted under the OSP. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.42.0 years.

Performance Shares.    During fiscal year 2008, the Company implemented a long-term performance share program. Under this program, vested shares of the Company’s common stock could be granted under the OSP to certain key employees, depending on the Company’s performance relative to pre-determined long-term earnings per share targets.

As of October 2, 2009, targeted performance shares had been awarded for two performance periods, key aspects of which are summarized below:

Performance period

Range of shares

issuable

Timing of share issuance

(if earned)

Fiscal years 2008 – 2010

0 – 73,000Fiscal year 2011

Fiscal years 2009 – 2011

0 – 121,800Fiscal year 2012

As of October 2, 2009, no performance share awards were earned or were expected to be earned based on the pre-determined criteria and no share based compensation expense related to these performance shares has been recognized in fiscal years 2009 or 2008.

 

Non-Employee Director Stock Units.    Under the terms of the OSP, on the first business day following each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders, each person then serving as a non-employee director is automatically granted stock units having an initial value of $25,000.$45,000 beginning in fiscal year 2008 and $25,000 prior to fiscal year 2008. The stock units will vest upon termination of the director’s service on the Board of Directors and will then be satisfied by issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock. Each non-employee director who holds stock units willdoes not have rights as a stockholder with respect to the

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

shares issuable thereunder until such shares are paid out. The stock units are not transferable, except to the non-employee director’s designated beneficiary or estate in the event of his or her death. During both fiscal years 2009 and 2008, the Company granted stock units with an aggregate value of $225,000 to non-employee members of its Board of Directors (of which there were five) and recognized the total value of $225,000 as share-based compensation expense at the time of grant in each of those respective periods. During fiscal year 2007, the Company granted stock units with an aggregate value of $125,000 to non-employee members of its Board of Directors (of which there were five) and recognized the total value of $125,000 as share-based compensation expense at the time of grant. During fiscal year 2006 and 2005, the Company granted stock units with an aggregate value of $150,000 to non-employee members of its Board of Directors (of which there were six) and recognized the total value of $150,000 as share-based compensation expense at the time of grant in each of those respective periods.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.    Under the ESPP, employees purchased approximately142,200 shares for $3.6 million, 79,100 shares for $3.9 million and 96,600 shares for $3.8 million, 114,500 shares for $3.6 million and 118,700 shares for $3.9 million, during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of September 28, 2007, a total of approximately 267,000 shares remained available for issuance under the ESPP.

 

During the fiscal year ended September 28,2009, the weighted-average estimated fair value of the option to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock under the ESPP was $5.98 per share for offering periods during the year. During fiscal year 2008, the weighted-average estimated fair value of the option to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock under the ESPP was $13.88 per share for offering periods during the year. During fiscal year 2007, the weighted-average estimated fair value of the option to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock under the ESPP was $10.87 per share for offering periods during fiscal year 2007. During the fiscal year ended September 29, 2006, the weighted-average estimated fair value of the option to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock under the ESPP was $8.24 per share for offering periods during fiscal year 2006.year.

 

Share-Based Compensation under SFAS 123(R)Expense.    Effective October 1, 2005,The following table summarizes the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective application method. Accordingly, during the fiscal years 2007 and 2006, the Company recordedamount of share-based compensation expense that would have been recognized hadby award type as well as the fair value method been applied sinceeffect of this expense on income tax expense and net earnings:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

(in thousands)

    

Share-based compensation expense by award type:

    

Employee and non-employee director stock options

  $4,768   $5,484   $6,653  

Employee stock purchase plan

   815    1,048    948  

Restricted (nonvested) stock

   1,897    2,916    2,220  

Non-employee director stock units

   225    225    125  
             

Total share-based compensation expense (effect on earnings before income taxes)

   7,705    9,673    9,946  

Effect on income tax expense

   (2,671  (2,686  (3,622
             

Effect on net earnings

  $5,034   $6,987   $6,324  
             

Share-based compensation expense included in the effective date of SFAS 123,butpreceding table related to restricted (non-vested) stock includes $238,000, $332,000 and $128,000 in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to shares granted in connection with the Company’s fiscal year 20052007 restructuring plan.

Share-based compensation expense recorded has not been restated.included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended
   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
  September 28,
2007

(in thousands)

      

Cost of sales

  $388  $463  $443

Selling, general and administrative

   7,034   8,728   8,970

Research and development

   283   482   533
            

Total

  $7,705  $9,673  $9,946
            

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The effect of adopting SFAS 123(R) on earnings before income taxes, income tax expense, net earnings, and net earnings per share for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 was as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

   

Share-based compensation expense by award type:

   

Employee and non-employee director stock options

  $(6,653) $(7,005)

Employee stock purchase plan

   (948)  (913)

Restricted (nonvested) stock(1)

   (2,220)  (644)

Non-employee director stock units

   (125)  (150)
         

Total share-based compensation expense (effect on earnings before income taxes)

   (9,946)  (8,712)

Effect on income tax expense

   3,622   3,172 
         

Effect on net earnings

  $(6,324) $(5,540)
         

Effect on net earnings per share:

   

Basic

  $(0.20) $(0.18)
         

Diluted

  $(0.20) $(0.18)
         

(1)Includes $128,000 in fiscal year 2007 related to shares granted in connection with the Company’s fiscal year 2007 restructuring plan.

As of October 1, 2005 (the date SFAS 123(R) was adopted), the Company had unrecorded deferred share-based compensation related to stock options of $6.7 million after estimated forfeitures. In the Company’s pro forma disclosures prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for forfeitures upon occurrence. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised if necessary in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

As of September 28, 2007, the unrecorded deferred share-based compensation balance related to stock options was $4.1 million. This amount will be recognized as expense using the straight-line attribution method over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.3 years.

Share-based compensation expense recorded during the fiscal years ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 has been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006

(in thousands)

    

Cost of sales

  $443  $448

Selling, general and administrative

   8,970   7,723

Research and development

   533   541
        

Total

  $  9,946  $  8,712
        

 

Capitalizable share-based compensation expense relating to inventory or deferred cost of sales (a component of deferred profit) was not significant at October 2, 2009, October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 or September 29, 2006.2007.

 

Valuation Assumptions.    The Company estimates the fair value of employee stock options granted under the OSP and shares issued under the ESPP using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R), SAB 107 and the Company’s prior-period pro forma disclosures of net earnings, including share-based compensation (determined under a fair value method as prescribed by

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SFAS 123).model. The fair value of each option grant under the OSP and each share issuance under the ESPP was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 

Employee and non-employee director stock options:

       

Expected dividend yield

  0.0% 0.0%  0.0 0.0 0.0

Risk-free interest rate

  4.6% 4.5%  2.5 3.4 4.6

Expected price volatility

  30% 30%  34 29 30

Expected life (in years)

  4.5  4.5   4.7   4.5   4.5  

Employee stock purchases:

   

Employee stock purchase plan purchases:

    

Expected dividend yield

  0.0% 0.0%  0.0 0.0 0.0

Risk-free interest rate

  5.0% 4.5%  0.1 2.1 5.0

Expected price volatility

  28% 30%  61 39 28

Expected life (in years)

  0.3  0.3   0.3   0.3   0.3  

 

Option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option’s expected forfeiture rate and life of the option and the expected price volatility of the underlying stock. The Company estimates the expected forfeiture and expected life assumptions based on historical experience. In determining the Company’s expected stock price volatility assumption, was determined using a combination ofthe Company reviews both the historical and implied volatility of the Company’s common stock, with implied volatility based on the implied volatility of publicly traded options on the Company’s common stock. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company used only historical volatility in deriving its expected volatility assumption. The Company believes thatdetermines the expected stock price volatility assumption using a combination of historical and implied volatility is more reflectiveunless the volume or maturity of current marketthese publicly traded options does not satisfy the conditions to use implied volatility. The expected stock price volatility assumption for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was determined using only the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. For fiscal year 2007, the expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using a better indicatorcombination of expected future volatility.the historical and implied volatility of the Company’s common stock.

 

Share-Based Compensation Expense prior to AdoptionNote 15.    Income Taxes

The sources of SFAS 123(R).    During fiscal year 2005, which was prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company applied the intrinsic value method as prescribed by APB 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock compensation plans and provided the required pro forma disclosures of SFAS 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.earnings before income taxes follow:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

(in thousands)

    

United States

  $(27,141 $(7,359 $(3,387

Foreign

   86,288    110,078    100,215  
             

Earnings before income taxes

  $59,147   $102,719   $96,828  
             

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of options granted under its OSP and shares issued under its ESPP as prescribed by SFAS 123, net earnings and net earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown below:

   Fiscal Year Ended
Sept. 30, 2005
 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  

Earnings from continuing operations:

  

As reported

  $46,687 

Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of related tax effects

   257 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

   (5,682)
     

Pro forma

  $41,262 
     

Earnings per share from continuing operations:

  

Basic—as reported

  $1.39 
     

Basic—pro forma

  $1.23 
     

Diluted—as reported

  $1.36 
     

Diluted—pro forma

  $1.20 
     

The fair value of each option grant under the OSP and each share issuance under the ESPP was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Fiscal Year Ended
Sept. 30, 2005

Employee and non-employee director stock options:

Expected dividend yield

0.0%

Risk-free interest rate

3.6%

Expected price volatility

40%

Expected life (in years)

4.1

Employee stock purchases:

Expected dividend yield

0.0%

Risk-free interest rate

2.0%

Expected price volatility

40%

Expected life (in years)

0.5

The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted under the OSP was $13.37 per share for fiscal year 2005. The weighted-average estimated fair value of the option to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock under the ESPP was $9.50 for offering periods during fiscal year 2005. No share-based compensation expense was recorded during fiscal year 2005 relating to employee stock options granted under the OSP or shares issued under the ESPP since the Company applied FAS 123 for disclosure purposes only during that period.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Note 15.    Income Taxes

The sources of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes follow:

   Fiscal Year Ended
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  Sept. 30,
2005

(in thousands)

    

United States

  $(3,387) $(7,317) $1,176

Foreign

   100,215   81,981   62,277
            

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes

  $  96,828  $  74,664  $  63,453
            

Income tax expense on earnings from continuing operations consists of the following:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  Sept. 28,
2007
 Sept. 29,
2006
 Sept. 30,
2005
   October 2,
2009
 October 3,
2008
 September 28,
2007
 

(in thousands)

        

Current

        

U.S. federal

  $7,730  $5,629  $(5,659)

U.S. Federal

  $(385 $(1,670 $7,730  

Foreign

   32,728   30,907   22,777    32,134    39,909    32,728  

State and local

   2,158   958   1,183    182    1,157    2,158  
                    

Total current

   42,616   37,494   18,301    31,931    39,396    42,616  
                    

Deferred

        

U.S. federal

   (8,002)  (9,038)  4,356 

U.S. Federal

   (7,487  (1,422  (8,002

Foreign

   422   (1,872)  (5,817)   (3,614  (442  422  

State and local

   (1,824)  (1,989)  (74)   (303  73    (1,824
                    

Total deferred

   (9,404)  (12,899)  (1,535)   (11,404  (1,791  (9,404
                    

Income tax expense

  $33,212  $24,595  $16,766   $20,527   $37,605   $33,212  
                    

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences between the tax basis and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and tax loss and credit carry-forwards. Their significant components follow:

 

   Fiscal Year End
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006

(in thousands)

    

Assets

    

Inventory

  $11,898  $10,008

Revenue recognition

   4,938   4,284

Capitalized research costs

   20,071   19,912

Loss carry-forwards

   1,398   3,153

Deferred compensation

   15,475   10,186

Product warranty

   3,833   3,178

Other

   4,451   2,648
        

Total deferred tax assets

   62,064   53,369
        

Liabilities

    

Depreciation and amortization

   17,431   18,171

Currency translation adjustment

   5,689   
        

Total deferred tax liabilities

   23,120   18,171
        

Net deferred tax assets

  $  38,944  $  35,198
        

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
 

(in thousands)

   

Assets

   

Capitalized research and development costs

  $28,406   $22,646  

Deferred compensation

   17,501    16,154  

Inventory

   14,422    12,623  

Deferred profit

   5,294    3,564  

Product warranty

   3,737    3,827  

Loss and credit carry-forwards

   1,665    2,292  

Other

   3,822    2,434  
         

Gross deferred tax assets

   74,847    63,540  

Valuation allowance

   (618  (837
         

Total deferred tax assets

   74,229    62,703  
         

Liabilities

   

Depreciation and amortization

   18,923    18,782  

Currency translation adjustment

   6,938    5,406  

Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries

       836  
         

Total deferred tax liabilities

   25,861    25,024  
         

Net deferred tax assets

  $48,368   $37,679  
         

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, the Company’s foreign manufacturing and sales subsidiaries had accumulated approximately $95.7$151 million of earnings that have been reinvested in their operations. The Company has not provided U.S. tax on these earnings. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on such earnings is not practicable.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As of September 28, 2007,October 2, 2009, the Company had a U.S. foreign tax credit carry-forward of approximately $1.9 million that expires in 2019. If realized, all of this carry-forward will be accounted for as a credit to stockholders’ equity. None of this carry-forward has been recognized as a deferred tax asset.

As of October 2, 2009, the Company had U.S. federal research and development credit carry-forwards of approximately $1.5 million that begin to expire in 2028 and have been recognized as a deferred tax asset.

As of October 2, 2009, the Company had foreign loss carry-forwardscarry-forward of approximately $5.0$0.7 million that have been recognized as deferred tax assets. In fiscal year 2006, foreign income tax expense included $0.6 million relating toA full valuation allowance has been provided on this loss carry-forwards that were recorded as a reduction to goodwill. In fiscal year 2005, foreign income tax expense was reduced $0.3 million for a current-year loss that was carried forward.carry-forward.

 

The difference between the reported income tax rate on earnings from continuing operationsbefore income taxes and the federal statutory income tax rate is attributable to the following:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
  Sept. 30,
2005
 

Federal statutory income tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State and local taxes, net of federal benefit

  0.2  (0.9) 1.1 

Foreign taxes

  (0.8) 0.1  (2.8)

Deferred tax on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries

      (7.6)

Other

  (0.1) (1.3) 0.7 
          

Reported income tax rate

  34.3% 32.9% 26.4%
          

In fiscal year 2005, the Company reversed approximately $4.8 million of deferred tax liability previously accrued on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and recognized a credit to income tax expense in an equal amount. This resulted from a combination of a change in the treatment of foreign tax credits under new U.S. law enacted during fiscal year 2005 and the elimination of withholding tax on certain dividends under new tax law enacted in Switzerland during fiscal year 2005.

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

Federal statutory income tax rate

  35.0 35.0 35.0

State and local taxes, net of federal benefit

  (0.1 0.8   0.2  

Foreign taxes

  (2.2 (2.2 (0.8

Costs related to pending acquisition

  3.6        

U.S. taxes on dividends

  1.0   2.1   (0.1

Other

  (2.6 0.9     
          

Reported income tax rate

  34.7 36.6 34.3
          

 

In fiscal years 20072009 and 2006,2008, accumulated other comprehensive income was increased approximately $0.4 million and decreased approximately $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, due to the tax benefit of certain post-retirementpostretirement liabilities recognized during those periods.

 

Effective September 29, 2007 (the first day of fiscal year 2008), the Company adopted ASC 740,Income Taxes, which addresses accounting for, and disclosure of, uncertain tax positions. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As a result of the adoption of ASC 740, the Company reduced its liability for unrecognized tax benefits and increased deferred tax assets by $2.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively. These adjustments were aggregated and accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, which resulted in an increase to retained earnings of $3.0 million. In addition, the Company reclassified certain tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, as well as related potential penalties and interest, from current liabilities to long-term liabilities. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest thereon as of the date of adoption was $6.9 million, substantially all of which would impact the effective tax rate if realized. The Company’s policy to include interest and penalties related to income taxes within income tax expense did not change as a result of implementing ASC 740. As of the date of adoption of ASC 740, the Company had accrued $0.7 million in income taxes payable for the payment of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

At October 2, 2009, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest thereon was $5.4 million, substantially all of which would impact the effective tax rate if realized during the year. The Company accrued $0.2 million and reversed $0.3 million of interest and penalties related to these unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2009. Income taxes payable at October 2, 2009 included accrued interest and penalties of $0.4 million. Although the timing and outcome of income tax audits is highly uncertain, it is possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by up to $0.9 million in the next twelve months due to lapse of certain statutes of limitation. Any such reduction could be impacted by other changes in unrecognized tax benefits.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits:

(in thousands)

  

Balance at September 29, 2007 (first day of fiscal year 2008)

  $6,924  

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

   1,501  

Expiration of the statute of limitations for the assessment of taxes

   (2,514
     

Balance at October 3, 2008

   5,911  

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

   777  

Decreases in earlier period tax positions

   (104

Expiration of the statute of limitations for the assessment of taxes

   (1,213
     

Balance at October 2, 2009

  $5,371  
     

The Company’s U.S. federal, state and local and foreign income tax returns are subject to audit by relevant tax authorities. In September 2006,During fiscal year 2008, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service commenced anclosed its examination of the Company’s fiscal year 2003 U.S. federal tax return.return without assessing additional tax. The Company has established tax reserves representing its best estimate of additionalCompany’s income tax it may be requiredreporting periods beginning with fiscal year 2006 for the U.S. and fiscal year 2004 for the Company’s major foreign jurisdictions remain generally open to pay if certain tax positions are successfully challengedaudit by therelevant tax authorities.

See Note 1 discussing the revision of the fiscal year 2008 income tax expense and related deferred tax asset that is reflected in the above footnote.

 

Note 16.    Net Earnings Per Share

 

Basic earnings per share are calculated based on net earnings and the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the reported period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated similarly, except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period is increased by the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued. The dilutive effect of potential common stock (including outstanding stock options, ESPP shares,unvested restricted stock and non-employee director stock units and restricted stock)units) is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method, which includes consideration of share-based compensation and the tax benefit thereon as required by SFAS 123(R) in fiscal years 2007 and 2006.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)thereon.

 

In fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, options to purchase approximately 10,000, 452,0001,635,000, 255,000 and 561,00010,000 shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their effect was anti-dilutive.

 

A reconciliation of weighted-average basic shares outstanding to weighted-average diluted shares outstanding follows:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended  Fiscal Year Ended
  Sept. 28,
2007
  Sept. 29,
2006
 ��Sept. 30,
2005
  October 2,
2009
  October 3,
2008
  September 28,
2007

(in thousands)

            

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding

  30,457  30,929  33,673  28,785  29,620  30,457

Net effect of dilutive potential common stock

  547  495  682  151  452  547
                  

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding

  31,004  31,424  34,355  28,936  30,072  31,004
                  

 

Note 17.    Industry and Geographic Segments

 

Industry Segments.    For financial reporting purposes, the Company’s operations are grouped into two business segments: Scientific Instruments and Vacuum Technologies. The Scientific Instruments segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells and services equipment and related software, consumable products, accessories and services for a broad range of life science, environmental, energy, and industrialapplied

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

research and other applications requiring identification, quantification and analysis of the composition or structure of liquids, solids or gases. The Vacuum Technologies segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells and services vacuum products and related accessories and services used to create, contain, control, measure and test vacuum environments in a broad range of life science, environmental, energy, and industrialapplied research and other applications requiring ultra-clean or high-vacuum environments. These segments were determined based on how management views and evaluates the Company’s operations as required by SFAS 131,in accordance with ASC 280,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.Segment Reporting.

 

General corporate costs include shared costs of legal, tax, accounting, treasury, insurance and certain other management costs. A portion of the indirect and common costs has been allocated to the segments through the use of estimates. Also, transactions between segments are accounted for at cost and are not included in sales. Accordingly, the following information is provided for purposes of achieving an understanding of operations, but might not be indicative of the financial results of the reported segments were they independent organizations. In addition, comparisons of the Company’s operations to similar operations of other companies might not be meaningful.

 

The Company operates various manufacturing and marketing operations outside of the U.S. In fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, no single country outside of the U.S. accounted for more than 10% of total sales (based on the geographic location of the customer). Except for the United Kingdom, in fiscal years 2007 and 2006, no single country outside the U.S. accounted for more than 10% of total assets in fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005.2007. Transactions between geographic areas are accounted for at cost and are not included in sales.

 

Included in the total of Other international sales salesare export sales recorded by U.S. entities of $47 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 of approximately $53 million, $62 millionyear 2009, and $53 million respectively.

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)in both fiscal years 2008 and 2007.

 

Industry Segments

 

 Total Sales 

Pretax

Earnings

 

Identifiable

Assets

 

Capital

Expenditures

 Depreciation and
Amortization
 Total Sales Pretax
Earnings
 Identifiable
Assets
 Capital
Expenditures
 Depreciation
and
Amortization
 2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007

(in millions)

                              

Scientific Instruments

 $762 $686 $633 $79  $60  $51  $631 $ 610 $ 501 $ 16 $ 18 $ 14 $ 25 $ 23 $ 18 $675 $839 $762 $54   $81   $79   $631 $695 $631 $25 $21 $16 $24 $25 $25

Vacuum Technologies

  159  149  140  32   29   25   58  54  55  3  2  3  4  4  4  132  174  159  26    34    32    49  57  58    3  3  3  4  4
                                                                  

Total industry segments

  921  835  773  111   89   76   689  664  556  19  20  17  29  27  22  807  1,013  921  80    115    111    680  752  689  25  24  19  27  29  29

General corporate

        (18)  (16)  (16)  248  198  240  0  0  5  0  0  2        (21  (13  (18  264  150  248  0  0  0  0  0  0

Impairment of private company equity investment

            (3                      

Interest income

        6   4   5                           1    6    6                    

Interest expense

        (2)  (2)  (2)                          (1  (2  (2                  
                                                                  

Continuing operations

 $ 921 $ 835 $ 773 $97  $75  $63  $937 $862 $796  19  20  22  29  27  24

Total company

 $807 $1,013 $921 $59   $103   $97   $944 $902 $937 $25 $24 $19 $27 $29 $29
                                                                  

Discontinued operations (Note 3)

      1      2
                     

Total

 $19 $20 $23 $29 $27 $26
                     

Geographic Information

 

  

Sales to

Unaffiliated
Customers (1)

 Intergeographic
Sales to Affiliates
  Total Sales  

Pretax

Earnings

  

Identifiable

Assets

  2007 2006 2005 2007  2006  2005  2007  2006  2005  2007  2006  2005  2007 2006 2005

(in millions)

               

United States

 $264 $273 $306 $97  $189  $100  $361  $462  $406  $28  $40  $23  $303 $315 $282

United Kingdom(3)

                                   111  115  56

Other international

  657  562  467  304   288   325   961   850   792   101   68   65   275  232  213
                                                      

Total geographic segments

  921  835  773  401   477   425   1,322   1,312   1,198   129   108   88   689  662  551

Eliminations, corporate
and other

        (401)  (477)  (425)  (401)  (477)  (425)  (32)  (33)  (25)  248  200  245
                                                      

Total company

 $ 921 $ 835 $ 773 $  $  $  $ 921  $ 835  $ 773  $ 97  $ 75  $ 63  $ 937 $ 862 $ 796
                                                      
  

Long-Lived

Assets (2)

  
  2007 2006 2005 

(in millions)

    

United States

 $70 $72 $69 

United Kingdom

  13  12  3 

Italy

  15  14  14 

Other international

  29  23  24 
          

Total company

 $127 $121 $110 
          

  Sales to
Unaffiliated
Customers(1)
 Intergeographic
Sales to Affiliates
  Total Sales  Pretax
Earnings
 
  2009 2008 2007 2009  2008  2007  2009  2008  2007  2009  2008  2007 

(in millions)

            

United States

 $221 $279 $264 $103   $118   $97   $324   $397   $361   $5   $26   $28  

International

  586  734  657  283    357    304    869    1,091    961    91    105    101  
                                             

Total geographic segments

  807  1,013  921  386    475    401    1,193    1,488    1,322    96    131    129  

Eliminations, corporate and other

        (386  (475  (401  (386  (475  (401  (37  (28  (32
                                             

Total company

 $807 $1,013 $921 $   $   $   $807   $1,013   $921   $59   $103   $97  
                                             
  Identifiable
Assets
 Long-Lived
Assets(2)
                   
  2009 2008 2007 2009  2008  2007                   

(in millions)

            

United States

 $545 $461 $551 $75   $67   $70        

United Kingdom

  103  112  111  11    12    13        

Italy(3)

        13    14    15        

The Netherlands(3)

        15    17    12        

Other international

  296  329  275  14    15    17        
                           

Total company

 $944 $902 $937 $128   $125   $127        
                           

(1) Sales to unaffiliated customers are generally reported based on the geographic location of the customer. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of sales in any of the fiscal years presented.
(2) Excludes goodwill, intangible assets and long-term deferred tax assets.
(3) Sales and pretax earningsIdentifiable asset amounts are included in Other international amounts as they are not individually material.

SCHEDULE II

 

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

for fiscal years 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

(In thousands)

 

Description

  

Balance at

Beginning

of Period

  Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  Deductions  

Balance at
End of
Period

  Balance at
Beginning
of Period
  Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  Deductions  Balance at
End of
Period
   Description  Amount      Description  Amount  

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable:

                  

Fiscal year 2009

  $  1,252  $  156   Write-offs & adjustments  $  115  $  1,293
              

Fiscal year 2008

  $1,748  $(138 Write-offs & adjustments  $358  $1,252
              

Fiscal year 2007

  $1,982  $(167) Write-offs & adjustments  $67  $1,748  $1,982  $(167 Write-offs & adjustments  $67  $1,748
                            

Fiscal year 2006

  $1,790  $391  Write-offs & adjustments  $199  $1,982
              

Fiscal year 2005

  $  1,916  $  276  Write-offs & adjustments  $  402  $  1,790
              

VARIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

 

Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

Amounts for each quarterly period in fiscal years 20072009 and 20062008 follow:

 

  Fiscal Year 2007  Fiscal Year 2009
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter

(in millions, except per share amounts)

                

Sales

  $  218.0  $  229.9  $  227.1  $  245.6  $  208.2  $  205.4  $  196.6  $  196.5
                        

Gross profit

  $99.7  $105.5  $101.9  $108.4  $95.3  $89.5  $86.6  $83.3
                        

Net earnings

  $15.4  $16.3  $14.5  $17.4  $13.0  $10.2  $13.5  $1.9
                        

Net earnings per share

                

Basic

  $0.50  $0.54  $0.48  $0.57  $0.45  $0.35  $0.47  $0.07
                        

Diluted

  $0.49  $0.53  $0.47  $0.56  $0.45  $0.35  $0.47  $0.07
                        
  Fiscal Year 2006  Fiscal Year 2008
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter

(in millions, except per share amounts)

                

Sales

  $  195.7  $  209.6  $  209.8  $  219.6  $237.4  $248.2  $244.4  $282.5
                        

Gross profit

  $85.9  $92.9  $94.6  $100.9  $107.3  $112.9  $106.2  $126.1
                        

Net earnings

  $9.7  $11.2  $14.5  $14.7  $17.6  $15.8  $11.4  $20.3
                        

Net earnings per share

                

Basic

  $0.31  $0.36  $0.47  $0.48  $0.58  $0.53  $0.39  $0.70
                        

Diluted

  $0.30  $0.36  $0.46  $0.47  $0.57  $0.52  $0.38  $0.69
                        

 

Net earnings per share for the four quarters of each fiscal year may not sum to the total for the fiscal year because of the different number of shares outstanding during each period.

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  

Date Filed

  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
  2.1  Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement, dated as of January 14, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  2.1  
  2.2  Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 26, 2009, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., Varian, Inc. and Cobalt Acquisition Corp.  8-K  July 27, 2009  2.1  
  3.1  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  3.1, 3.2  
  3.2  Amended and Restated By-Laws of Varian, Inc.  8-K  February 9, 2009  3.1  
  4.1  Specimen Common Stock Certificate.  10-Q  May 12, 2009  4.1  
10.1  Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of April 2, 1999, among Varian Associates, Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. and Varian, Inc.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.2  
10.2  Varian, Inc. Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement and Assumption dated as of April 2, 1999.  10-Q  May 17, 1999  10.6  
10.3  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2005, between Varian, Inc. and Jabil Circuit, Inc.  8-K  March 17, 2005  2.1  
10.4  Form of Indemnity Agreement between Varian, Inc. and its Directors and Officers.  10-K  December 9, 2004  10.5  
10.5*  Varian, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  February 1, 2008  10.1  
10.6*  Varian, Inc. Management Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007.  8-K  November 13, 2007  10.9  
10.7*  Varian, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of November 13, 2008.  10-K  November 26, 2008  10.7  
10.8*  Varian, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  10-Q  May 10, 2000  10.1  
10.9*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning April 2, 1999 and prior to November 10, 2003).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.9  
10.10*  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 10, 2003 and prior to November 11, 2004).  10-K  December 7, 2006  10.10  

F-37


Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

No.

Exhibit Description

Form

Date Filed

Exhibit
Number(s)
Filed
Herewith
10.11*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 11, 2004 and prior to December 4, 2006).10-KDecember 7, 200610.11
10.12*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).10-KDecember 7, 200610.12
10.13*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).8-KNovember 13, 200710.3
10.14*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.10-KDecember 9, 200410.12
10.15*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors—For New Director/Chairman Grants (used beginning February 1, 2008).10-QMay 6, 200810.29
10.16*Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors—For Annual Director Grants (used beginning February 1, 2008).10-QMay 6, 200810.30
10.17*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used prior to December 4, 2006).10-KDecember 7, 200610.14
10.18*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning December 4, 2006 and prior to November 8, 2007).10-KDecember 7, 200610.15
10.19*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).10-QFebruary 5, 200810.17
10.20*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Certain Executive Officers (used beginning March 13, 2009).8-KMarch 17, 200910.1
10.21*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy (used beginning March 13, 2009).8-KMarch 17, 200910.2
10.22*Form of Performance Share Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning November 8, 2007).8-KNovember 13, 200710.1
10.23*Form of Performance Share Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers (used beginning October 6, 2008).8-KSeptember 15, 200810.2


Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

No.

Exhibit Description

Form

Date Filed

Exhibit
Number(s)
Filed
Herewith
10.24*Form of Stock Unit Agreement between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.10-QFebruary 8, 200510.23
10.25*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Garry W. Rogerson.8-KNovember 13, 200710.4
10.26*Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Garry W. Rogerson.X
10.27*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy.8-KNovember 13, 200710.5
10.28*Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and G. Edward McClammy.X
10.29*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Martin O’Donoghue.8-KNovember 13, 200710.6
10.30*Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Martin O’Donoghue.X
10.31*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sergio Piras.8-KNovember 13, 200710.7
10.32*Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Sergio Piras.X
10.33*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Arthur W. Homan.8-KNovember 13, 200710.8
10.34*Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Arthur W. Homan.X
10.35*Change in Control Agreement, as amended and restated as of November 8, 2007, between Varian, Inc. and Sean M. Wirtjes.10-KNovember 21, 200710.25
10.36*Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Sean M. Wirtjes.X
10.37*Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2008, between Varian, Inc. and Robert W. Dean II.8-KSeptember 15, 200810.1


      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit

No.

  

Exhibit Description

  Form  

Date Filed

  Exhibit
Number(s)
  Filed
Herewith
10.38*  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Robert W. Dean II.        X
10.39*  Change in Control Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, between Varian, Inc. and Gordon B. Tredger.  10-K  November 26, 2008  10.30  
10.40*  Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2009, between Varian, Inc. and Gordon B. Tredger.        X
10.41*  Description of Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors.  10-Q  February 10, 2009  10.31  
10.42*  Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements between Varian, Inc. and Executive Officers.  10-K  November 21, 2007  10.27  
10.43*  Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements between Varian S.p.A. and Sergio Piras.  10-Q  February 5, 2008  10.28  
18.1  Preferability letter regarding inventory accounting principle change.  10-K  December 7, 2000  18.1  
21  Subsidiaries of the Registrant.        X
23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.        X
31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X
31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        X
32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        
32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        

*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.