UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20072008

Commission file number 1-13879

 

INNOSPEC INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE  98-0181725

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

  

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Innospec Manufacturing Park

Oil Sites Road

Ellesmere Port

Cheshire

United Kingdom

  CH65 4EY

(Address of principal executive offices)

  

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, includingarea code:011-44-151-355-3611

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

  Name of each exchange on
which registered

N/A

  N/A

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:    Common stock, par value $0.01 per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Yes

 


No

 

X


 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

 

Yes

 

 


No

 

X


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes

 

X


No

 

 


 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.            [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as definedcompany. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b – 2 of the Act).Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer 

 


Accelerated filer 

X


Non-accelerated filer 

 


Smaller reporting company 

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

 

Yes

 

 


No

 

X


 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2007)2008) was approximately $402$234 million, based on the closing price of the common shares on the NASDAQ Stock Market on June 29, 2007.30, 2008. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each beneficial owner who owns 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for any other purpose.

 

As of February 15, 2008, 23,710,03013, 2009, 23,598,116 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of Innospec Inc.’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 6, 20087, 2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1

PART I

  3

Item 1

  Business  3

Item 1A

  Risk Factors  109

Item 1B

  Unresolved Staff Comments  1718

Item 2

  Properties  1819

Item 3

  Legal Proceedings  1920

Item 4

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  2123

PART II

  2224

Item 5

  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  2224

Item 6

  Selected Financial Data  2527

Item 7

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  2730

Item 7A

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  4749

Item 8

  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  4952

Item 9

  

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and

Financial Disclosure

  9598

Item 9A

  Controls and Procedures  9598

Item 9B

  Other Information  9699

PART III

  97100

Item 10

  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  97100

Item 11

  Executive Compensation  97100

Item 12

  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  97100

Item 13

  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  97100

Item 14

  Principal Accountant Fees and Services  98101

PART IV

  99102

Item 15

  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  99102

SIGNATURES

  104105

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT RELATIVE TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements which address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, all of the Company’s guidance for revenues,sales, gross margins, net income, growth potential and other measures of financial performance. Although suchforward-looking statements are believed by management to be reasonable when made, caution should be exercised not to place undue reliance on forward-lookingsuch statements whichbecause they are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. Risks, assumptions and uncertainties include, without limitation, changes in the terms of trading with significant customers or the gain or loss thereof, changes in the costs and availability of energy, raw materials, and other inputs, our ability to continue to achieve organic growth in our Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses, our ability to successfully integrate any acquisitions in those business segments,our non-Octane Additives businesses, the effects of changing government regulations and economic and market conditions, competition and changes in demand and business and legal risks inherent in non-U.S.the Company’s activities, including political and economic uncertainty, import and export limitations and market risks related to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates, government investigations, material fines or other penalties resulting from the Company’s voluntary disclosure to the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury the investigation byand the Securities and Exchange Commission and the(“SEC”), U.S. Department of Justice and United Kingdom Serious Fraud Office investigations into the Company’s participationinvolvement in the United Nations Oil for Food Program, or other regulatory actions and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20072008 and those identified in the Company’s other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

 

Item 1Business

 

When we use the terms the “Corporation,” “Company,” “Registrant,” “we,” “us” and “our,” unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, we are referring to Innospec Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“Innospec”).

 

General

 

Innospec Inc. develops, manufactures, blends and markets fuel additives and other specialty chemicals. Our products are sold primarily to oil refineries and other chemical and industrial companies throughout the world. Our fuel additives help improve fuel efficiency, boost engine performance and reduce harmful emissions. Our specialty chemicals provide effective technology-based solutions for our customers’ processes or products focused in the Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; and Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & PaperIngredients markets.

 

Our principal executive offices are in Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom. We became an independent company on May 22, 1998, when we were spun off from our then parent corporation Chemtura Corporation, previously known as Great Lakes Chemical Corporation. We changed our name from Octel Corp. to Innospec Inc. on January 30, 2006. On March 21, 2006 we transferred the listing of our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) to the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”).

 

Segmental Information

 

Innospec divides its business into three distinct segments for both management and reporting purposes: Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals (previously Performance Chemicals as explained below) and Octane Additives. The Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses both operate in markets where we actively seek growth opportunities albeit their end customers are very different. The Octane Additives business, although still profitable, is characterized by substantial declining demand.

 

On October 1, 2007June 23, 2008 the Company announced a further streamlining of its fast-growing Performance Chemicals divisionbusiness into a unified, sales-led global business focused on rapidly meeting customers’ needs anywhere in the world. The Company is moving to an integrated regional model running its growth businesses as one streamlined business operating across three geographical regions – Americas, EMEA (i.e. Europe, Middle East and five core industry sectors. This led toAfrica), and ASPAC (i.e. Asia-Pacific). The Company will report its financial performance based on the segment being re-branded undersegments contained within this integrated regional model when the banner “Active Chemicals.” The five core industry sectors are Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & Paper markets.Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews the Company’s operating results primarily on this basis.

 

Fuel Specialties

 

Our Fuel Specialties business develops, manufactures, blends and markets a range of specialty chemical products used as additives to a wide range of fuels. The business specializes in supplying fuel additives that help improve fuel efficiency, boost engine performance and

reduce harmful emissions. The business’ products are used in the efficient operation of automotive, marine and aviation engines, (“Avtel”), power station generators, and heating and diesel particulate filter systems.

 

Historically, through to the end of 2004, the business had grown through a program of acquisitions. This program has included the establishment in 1999 of a 50% owned joint venture with Starreon LLC to sell fuel additives in the U.S. and the subsequent acquisition of the remaining 50% of that joint venture in July 2004. Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC (previously known as Octel Starreon LLC) operates as the regional hub of the Fuel Specialties Americas business. The Company has also established a joint venture in Innospec Valvemaster Limited (“Valvemaster”). Valvemaster markets an anti valve seat recession additive.

 

More recently growth in the Fuel Specialties business has been driven by new product development to address what we believe are the key drivers in demand for fuel additives. These key drivers are legislation, population affluence, and energy price and availability. We have devoted substantial resources to the development of new and improved products that may be used to improve fuel efficiency. Accordingly in our Fuel Specialties segment 43%40% of our sales in 20072008 were derived from products developed during the previous five years.

 

Active Chemicals

 

Our Active Chemicals business provides effective technology-based solutions for our customers’ processes or products focused in the Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; and Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & PaperIngredients markets.

 

Historically the business has grown through a program of acquisitions. This program has included the acquisition of Finetex, Inc. in January 2005, Innospec Widnes Limited (previously known as Aroma Fine Chemicals Limited) in August 2004 and Innospec Leuna GmbH in June 2004. In December 2005, the Company disposed of two non-core businesses, Octel Performance Chemicals Inc. and the Gamlen Industries SA waste water treatment business. Effective January 1, 2007 the businesses of Finetex, Inc. and ProChem Chemicals, Inc. were merged into Innospec Active Chemicals LLC (previously known as Innospec Performance Chemicals U.S. Co.).

 

The focus for our Active Chemicals business intendsis to develop high performance products from its technology base complemented by selective acquisitions to achieve critical mass in a focused number of markets.

 

Octane Additives

 

Our Octane Additives business is the world’s only producer of tetra ethyl lead (“TEL”). The Octane Additives business comprises sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline and trading in respect of our environmental remediation business.

 

TEL was first developed in 1928 and introduced into the European market for internal combustion engines to boost octane levels in gasoline allowing it to burn more efficiently and

eliminating engine knock. It also acts as a lubricity aid reducing engine wear.wear and preventing valve seat recession. Worldwide use of TEL has declined since 1973 following the enactment

of the U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 and similar legislation in other countries. The trend of countries exiting the leaded gasoline market has resulted in a general rate of decline in volume terms in the last few years of between 10% and 25% per annum. The decline experienced in 2006 was greater than this general range due to the decision of South Africa to exit the market for use of TEL in automotive gasoline from the start of 2006. The decline experienced in 2007 was less than this general range due to the fact that no significant customer has exited the market for use of TEL in automotive gasoline since the decision of South Africa. The predicted remaining salesSales of the Octane Additives business are now concentrated in a relatively small number of customerscustomers. Accordingly, volume decline experienced in any one financial period may be greater or less than this general rate of decline and thereforeremaining sales in this business may decline with unpredictable volatility and severity.

 

We intend to manage the decrease in the sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline to maximize the cash flow through the decline. Continuous cost improvement measures have been, and will continue to be, taken to respond to declining market demand.

 

Our environmental remediation business assists customers to manage the clean up of the associated redundant plants as refineries complete the change to unleadedmove from leaded fuel.

 

Strategy

 

We have worked for several years to counteract the decline of the Octane Additives business by continuous cost improvement and continuing to leverage and organically grow the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses. Our strategy is to continue to develop new and improved technologies to capitalize on the market position that we have developed in these industriescontinue to strengthen and increase our salesmarket positions within our Fuel Specialties and profitability while continuingActive Chemicals businesses. In addition to manage the remaining Octane Additives business to maximize the cash flow through the decline. We have manycombined organic opportunities forrevenue growth in the near term from both geographicalof 58%, and product line extensions. Acquisitionsoperating income growth of 176%, in these businesses aresince 2005, we also a primaryactively continue to assess potential acquisitions that would enhance our customer offering. We focus for us.on acquisitions that would extend our technology base, geographical coverage or product portfolio. We believe that focusing on the industriesFuel Specialties and Active Chemicals sectors in which theseour businesses operate provideprovides the greatest opportunitiesopportunity for a good returnpositive returns on investments, including associated synergies,investment while minimizinglowering operating risk by investing in those markets where we have operating knowledgethe Company has experience, expertise and experience.knowledge.

 

Raw Materials and Product Supply

 

We use a variety of raw materials and chemicals in our manufacturing and blending processes and believe the sources of these are adequate for our current operations. Our major purchases are ethylene, sodium, lead, cetane number improvers, ethyl chloride, various solvents and dibromoethane.

 

These purchases account for a substantial portion of the Company’s variable manufacturing costs. These materials are, with the exception of ethylene in Germany, readily available from more than one source. We use long-term contracts (generally with fixed prices and escalation terms) to help ensure availability, continuity of supply and manage the risk of price increases. For some raw materials the risk of price increases is managed with commodity swaps.

The chemical industry, in general, is experiencing some tightness in the supply of certain commodity materials. We continue to monitor the situation and adjust our procurement strategies as we deem appropriate.

Intellectual Property

 

Our intellectual property, including trademarks, patents and licenses, forms a significant part of the Company’s competitive strengths particularly in the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses. The Company does not however consider its business as a whole to be dependent on any one trademark, patent or license.

 

The Company has a portfolio of trademarks and patents, granted and in the application stage, covering products and processes in several jurisdictions. The majority of these patents were developed by the Company and, subject to maintenance obligations including the payment of renewal fees, have at least ten years’ life remaining.

 

The trademark Innospec and the Innospec device in Classes 1, 2 and 4 of the “International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks” isare registered in all countries or jurisdictions in which itthe Company has a significant market presence. The Company also has trademark registrations in all countries or jurisdictions in which it has a significant market presence for the following: Stadis® (a range of conductivity improvers), Ortholeum® (a range of lubricant additives), Valvemaster® (a range of anti valve seat recession additives), Legal Diesel® (a range of diesel fuel additives), Satacen® (a range of iron-based organo-metallic fuel borne catalysts), OctaquestEnviomet® (a range of biodegradable chelating agents) and Finsolv® (a range of benzoate esters for personal care and cosmetic products).

 

We actively protect our inventions, new technologies, and product developments by filing patent applications or maintaining trade secrets. In addition, we vigorously participate in patent opposition proceedings around the world, where necessary, to secure a technology base free of infringement.

 

Customers

 

Fuel Specialties:Our customers are multinational oil companies and fuel retailers. Traditionally, a large portion of the total market was captive to oil companies that had fuel additives divisions providing supplies directly to their respective refinery customers. Many refineries are increasingly looking to purchase their fuel additive requirements on the open market. This trend is creating new opportunities for independent additive marketers such as ourselves.

 

Active Chemicals:Customers range from large multinational companies and manufacturers of personal care and household products, to specialty chemical manufacturers operating in niche industries.

Octane Additives:Sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline are made principally to the retail refinery market which comprises independent, state or major oil company owned refineries located throughout the world. Selling prices to major customers are usually negotiated under long-term supply agreements with varying prices and terms of payment. Our environmental remediation business then serves these customers to manage the clean up of the associated redundant plants as refineries complete the change to unleadedmove from leaded fuel.

In 20072008 the Company had one significant customer in the Fuel Specialties business, Royal Dutch Shell plc and its affiliates (“Shell”), who accounted for $66.2$84.6 million (11%(13%) of net group sales. In 20062007, Shell accounted for 11% of net group sales, and 2005in 2006 no single customer accounted for more than 10% of net group sales.

 

Competition

 

Fuel Specialties:The Fuel Specialties market is fragmented and characterized by a small number of competitors in each submarket. The competitors in each submarket differ with no one company holding a dominant position. We consider our competitive strengths to be our proven technical development capacity, independence from major oil companies and strong long-term relationships with refinery customers.

 

Active Chemicals:We operate in a number of active chemical market niches. Accordingly, there are a plethora of competitors who also operate in some, but not all, of these markets.

 

Octane Additives:Our Octane Additives business is the world’s only producer of TEL and accordingly is the only supplier of TEL for use in automotive gasoline. The business therefore competes with marketers of products and processes that provide alternative ways of enhancing octane performance in automotive gasoline.

 

Agreements with Ethyl Corporation

On October 1, 1998, Innospec entered into sales and marketing agreements (“TMAs”) with Ethyl Corporation (“Ethyl”) to market and sell tetra ethyl lead (“TEL”) in all areas of the world except North America and the European Economic Area for the period lasting until December 31, 2009, subject to renewal thereafter. This relationship was extended effective January 1, 2000 when two of our Swiss subsidiaries entered into similar TMAs with Ethyl’s Swiss subsidiaries. In April 2000, Ethyl made a payment to Innospec of $38.6 million as a prepayment for services to be provided under the Swiss TMAs. Effective July 1, 2001, another of our Swiss subsidiaries entered into a TMA with Veritel Chemicals BV (“Veritel”) and Ethyl agreed to participate in this TMA with the scope of all the TMAs being extended to include the European Economic Area.

No separate legal entity or joint venture was established as a consequence of the TMAs. All marketing and sales effort made under these arrangements were made in the name of Innospec. Innospec produced all TEL marketed under the TMAs and also provided marketing and other services. Ethyl provided bulk distribution services, marketing and other services. In addition, Ethyl was required to hold approximately one third of the inventories sold under these arrangements or deposit an equivalent dollar amount with Innospec. At March 31, 2007, Ethyl held no TEL inventories in respect of the TMAs and accordingly had deposited $12.0

million with us. The net proceeds under the TMAs were paid to Innospec and Ethyl as compensation for services and based on an agreed-upon formula, with Innospec receiving 68% of the total compensation for services provided and Ethyl receiving 32%. Ethyl’s 32% share of the net proceeds was advanced to Ethyl by us when payment was received from the TMA customers.

Innospec had commenced proceedings in the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”) against Ethyl regarding an alleged breach of duty by Ethyl under the TMAs by actively marketing and selling an alternative product. In addition, the Company was in dispute with Ethyl regarding the price that it was entitled to charge for the supply of TEL to Ethyl in the U.S. under a separate agreement (“U.S. Supply Agreement”). On June 15, 2007, both parties resolved all of the arbitration actions arising out of the disputes under the TMAs and the U.S. Supply Agreement. The TMAs were terminated effective April 1, 2007, and Innospec became the sole supplier of TEL outside of the U.S. (see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Research, Development and Testing

 

Research, development and testing (“R&D”) provide the basis for the growth of our Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses. Accordingly, the Company’s R&D activity has been, and will continue to be, focused on the development of new products and formulations for these.formulations. Technical support is provided for all of our business segments including Octane Additives.

 

Our principal research and development facilities are located in Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom. Expenditures to support research, product/application development and technical support services to customers were $14.8 million, $13.6 million, and $11.1 million in 2008, 2007, and $11.2 million in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

 

We consider that our proven technical capability provides us with a significant competitive advantage. In the last three years, the Fuel Specialties business has developed new detergent, cold flow, stabilizers, anti-foulants, lubricity and combustion improver products, in addition to the introduction of several new cost effective fuel additive packages. A patented process for manufacturing Enviomet™, a chelating agent, enabled us to enter into a new market in the active chemicals area.

 

Health, Safety and Environmental Matters

 

We are subject to environmental laws in all of the countries in which we conduct business. The principal environmental laws to which the Company is subject to in the United Kingdom are the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the Water Resources Act 1991, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and regulations and amendments thereto. Management believes that the Company is in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws and has made appropriate provision for the continued costs of compliance with environmental laws. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that changes in existing environmental laws, or the

discovery of additional liabilities associated with our current or former operations, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial position.

The principal sites giving rise to environmental remediation liabilities are the former Octane Additives manufacturing sites at Paimboeuf in France, Doberitz and Biebesheim in Germany, together with the Ellesmere Port site in the United Kingdom, which is the last ongoing manufacturer of TEL. Remediation work is substantially complete at Paimboeuf, Doberitz and Biebesheim. At Ellesmere Port there is a continuing remediation program related to those manufacturing units that have been closed. We regularly review the future costs of remediation and the current estimate is reflected in Note 1312 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

We record environmental liabilities relating to the retirement of assets and environmental clean up when they are probable and costs can be estimated reasonably. This involves anticipating the program of work and the associated future costs, and so involves the exercise of judgementjudgment by management.

 

New laws and regulations may be introduced in the future that could result in additional compliance costs and prevent or inhibit the development, distribution and sale of our products. The European Union (“EU”) has approved additional legislation known as the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemical Substances Regulations (“REACH”) which requires most of the Company’s products to be registered with EU Authorities. Under this legislation the Company has to demonstrate the continuing safety of its products. During this registration period the Company will incur expense to test and register its products. The Company estimates that the cost of complying with REACH will be approximately $10 million incurred over the next 4 years. While the Company expects that its products will be approved for registration after testing it is possible that certain products may not be registered if the test data proves unsatisfactory. In such an outcome some of the Company’s products may be restricted or prohibited in the EU.

 

Human ResourcesEmployees

 

Our workforceThe Company has 783 employees as at December 31, 2007 consisted of 769 employees, of which 364 were in the United Kingdom. Approximately 41% of our employees in the United Kingdom are represented by unions, including the Transport and General Workers Union and UNITE.

We have in place an employee communication program to help our employees understand both the business issues surrounding Innospec and the developing Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses. Regular briefings are conducted by the CEO and line managers where company-wide and departmental issues are discussed. More formal communication takes place with the trade unions recognized by us for negotiating and consultative purposes.2008.

 

Available Information

 

We file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, proxy statements and other documents. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20549, United States of America. The public may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website atwww.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information that registrants, including the Company, file electronically with the SEC.

Our corporate website iswww.innospecinc.com.www.innospecinc.com. We make available, free of charge, on or through this website our annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the SEC. In addition, Innospec’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and Director Independence standards, and the written charters for the committees of Innospec’s Board of Directors are available on this website under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance” and in print upon request by writing to: Corporate Secretary, Innospec Inc., Innospec Manufacturing Park, Oil Sites Road, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, United Kingdom, CH65 4EY.

 

None of the above available information forms part of this filing on Form 10-K, unless specifically incorporated by reference elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 

Item 1ARisk Factors

 

Our business is subject to many factors that could materially adversely affect our future performance and cause our actual results to differ materially from those experienced or implied by forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Investing in our securities involves risks and accordingly investors should carefully evaluate these risks including the factors discussed below before deciding to invest in our securities. Except as otherwise indicated, these factors may or may not occur and we cannot predict the likelihood of any such factor occurring. Other risk factors may exist that we do not consider significant based on information that is currently available. In addition, new risks may emerge at any time, and we cannot predict those risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect our future performance.

 

We may have to pay substantial fines and penalties if we are fined by the U.S. governmentor U.K. governments in connection with itstheir investigations regarding the United Nations Oil for Food Program and other related matters.

 

On February 7, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notifiedAs discussed in Item 3 within Part I Legal Proceedings, the Company that it had commenced an investigation to determine whether any violationsis the subject of law had occurredinvestigations by the U.S. and U.K. government authorities in connection with transactions conducted by the Company, including its wholly owned indirect subsidiary, Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH (“Alcor”), a Swiss company,potential violations under the United Nations Oil for Food Program, (“OFFP”) between June 1, 1999the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and December 31, 2003. As partother laws.

On the facts available to us it is not yet possible to form any reasonable estimate of its investigation, the SEC issuedpotential disgorgement, penalties and fine payments, either by reference to a subpoena requiringrange of possible outcomes or by reference to the productionlower end of certain documents, including documents relating to these transactions, bysuch a range of outcomes. The amount of any disgorgements, penalties or fines that the Company and Alcor. Upon receiptcould face would depend on a number of the SEC’s notification and initial subpoena, the Company undertook a review of its participation in the OFFP. On October 10, 2007 and November 1, 2007 the SEC served two additional subpoenas on the Company. These additional subpoenas required the production of documents relating notablyeventual factors which are not currently known to the OFFP but also relating to transactions conducted by the Company or its subsidiaries with state owned or controlled entities between June 1, 1999 and the date of such subpoenas, relating to its use of foreign agents and the possibility of extra-contractual payments made to secure business with foreign governmental entities. In a co-ordinated investigation, the Company has also been contacted by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding the possibility of violations of relevant laws in the

areas contained in the SEC subpoenas as well as additional preliminary inquiries regarding compliance with anti-trust laws relating to U.S. and international tetra ethyl lead markets. The subjects into which the SEC and DOJ have inquired include areas that involve certain former and current executives of the Company, including findings by relevant authorities regarding the current CEO. The Company,amount, nature and its officersscope of any improper payments, the amount of any pecuniary gain involved, the Company’s ability to pay, and directors, are cooperating with the SEC and DOJ investigations. On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company formed a committee comprised of the chairmen of the Board, the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee respectively, all of whom are independent directors. Counsel to the Company, providing assistance to the committee has, on behalf of the committee, conducted and will continue to conduct an investigation into the circumstances giving rise to the SEC and DOJ investigations. Counsel will report directly to the committee and will assist in connection with interactions with the SEC and DOJ. While the outcome of these investigations is uncertain, a number of companies involved in the OFFP investigations have been required to disgorge profits and pay civil fines and penalties up to $30 million. As a result of information discovered in the course of the investigation, we expect that we will be required to disgorge profits and pay fines and penalties that could be of similar magnitude. Any settlement of the SEC and DOJ inquiries relating to matters beyond the OFFP could require the Company to make significant additional disgorgements, penalty and fine payments. However at this time management is not able to predict with certainty the level of such fines and penalties. co-operation provided to government authorities during the investigations.

Because of the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome of these investigations and the costs to the Company of responding and participating in these on-going investigations,them, no assurance can be given

that the ultimate costs incurred and sanctions that may be imposed upon us will not have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities. At December 31, 2007 we have accrued $3.7 million in respect of probable future legal expenses in respect of this matter and have provided no additional accruals for this matter.

We may not be able to consummate, finance or successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, which could hinder our strategy or result in unanticipated expenses and losses.

It is part of our stated strategy that we intend to pursue strategic acquisitions and other opportunities to complement and expand our existing businesses. Our ability to implement this component of our strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisitions or other opportunities and financial resources, including our available cash and borrowing capacity and the financial markets. The success of these transactions will depend on our ability to integrate assets and personnel acquired in these transactions, apply our internal controls processes to these acquired businesses, and cooperate with our strategic partners. The expense incurred in consummating acquisitions or other opportunities, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition, or our failure to integrate businesses successfully, could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations. Furthermore, we may not realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipate when we first enter a transaction. Any of these risks could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

We may have additional tax liabilities.

We are subject to income taxes and state taxes in the U.S., as well as numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are currently under tax audit by various jurisdictions’ tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in our financial statements. This could have a material effect on our net income, financial position and/or cash flows from operating activities.

 

Competition, and market conditions or a general decline in global economic conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

 

Certain product lines and markets in which the Company’s businesses operate are subject to significant competition. The Company competes on the basis of a number of factors including, but not limited to, product quality and properties, customer relationships and service, and regulatory and toxicological expertise. For some products the competitors are larger than us and may have greater access to financial, technological and other resources. As a result these competitors may be able to better withstand a change in conditions within the industries in which the Company operates, a change in the prices of raw materials or a change in global economic conditions. Competitors may be able to introduce new products with enhanced features that may cause a decline in the demand and sales of the Company’s products. Consolidation of customers or competitors, or economic problems of customers, in the market areas in which the Company operates may cause a loss of market share for the Company’s products, or place downward pressure on prices.prices, result in payment delays or non-payment and declining plant utilization rates. Any of these risks could adversely impact our future revenues, gross margins, and cash flows from operating activities.

Sharp and unexpected fluctuations in the cost of our raw materials and energy could adversely affect our profit margins.

We use a variety of raw materials, chemicals and energy in our manufacturing and blending processes. Many of the raw materials that we use are derived from petrochemical-based feedstocks which can be subject to periods of rapid and significant price instability. These fluctuations in price can be caused by political instability in oil producing nations and elsewhere, or other factors influencing global supply and demand over which we have no or little control. Innospec has entered hedging arrangements for certain raw materials, but does not typically enter into hedging arrangements for all raw materials, chemicals or energy costs. Should costs of raw materials, chemicals or energy increase, and should Innospec’s businesses not be able to pass on these cost increases to our customers, then operating margins and cash flows from operating activities would be adversely impacted. Should raw material prices increase significantly, then the Company’s need for working capital could increase which would adversely impact cash flows from operating activities.

A disruption in the supply of raw materials or transportation services would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The chemical industry and transportation industry are in a situation where the supply and demand of both transportation services and the supply and demand of raw materials are in balance. Any significant disruption in supply could affect our ability to obtain raw materials or transportation services. This could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

 

We couldmay be adversely affected by technological changesrequired to make additional cash contributions to the defined benefit pension plan that we operate in our industry.the United Kingdom and recognize greater pension charges.

 

Our abilityThe Company’s principal pension arrangement is a contributory defined benefit pension plan (“the Plan”) covering a number of its current and former employees in the United Kingdom though it does also have other much smaller pension arrangements in the United Kingdom and overseas. The Plan is closed to maintainnew entrants without trustee discretion. The Projected Benefit Obligation (“PBO”) is based on final salary and years of credited service reduced by social security benefits according to a plan formula. Normal retirement age is 65 but provisions are made for early retirement. The Plan’s assets are invested by two investment management companies in funds holding United Kingdom and overseas equities, United Kingdom and overseas fixed interest securities, index linked securities, property unit trusts and cash or enhancecash equivalents.

The Plan predominantly covers Octane Additive employees and given the significant decline in this business we are now left with a Plan whose population is 95% pensioners and deferred pensioners and only 5% active members. The total liability of the Plan is approximately 5 times our technological capabilities, developcurrent market capitalization.

The Company is contributing amounts to the Plan to cover service costs to date. Employee and market productsemployer contributions from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2007 were at 5% and applications that meet changing customer requirements,22.6%, respectively, of pensionable pay. From January 1, 2007, employee and successfully anticipate or respond to technological changesemployer contributions were at 7% and 29%, respectively. In addition, since March 2007, the Company has been contributing £1.5 million per calendar year in accordance with a 10 year deficit recovery plan.

From January 1, 2008, employee and employer contributions remained at 7% and 29% though employee contributions were paid by the employer through a salary sacrifice arrangement. The estimated level of Company contributions into the Plan for 2009 is $5.8 million.

A full tri-annual actuarial valuation of the Plan was performed as at December 31, 2005 and an update performed as at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the results of which are reflected in these consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2008 the underlying plan asset value and PBO were $557.4 million and $571.2 million, respectively, resulting in a cost effective and timely mannerdeficit of $13.8 million. A full tri-annual actuarial valuation of the Plan as at December 31, 2008 will likely impact our future business success. Technological changesbe performed in some or all of our customers’ products or processes may make our products obsolete and accordingly adversely impact our2009. The results of operations,this valuation will be reflected in the consolidated financial position and cash flows.statements as at December 31, 2009.

 

Our Octane Additives business will continueThe Plan is broadly in the top decile of funded plans in the United Kingdom. However, due to decline.

Worldwide usethe recent significant adverse impact on global financial markets the value of TELPlan assets has declined since 1973 followingdeclined. In addition, the enactment offactors used to develop the U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 and similar legislationdiscount rate assumption have fluctuated in other countries. The trend of countries exiting the leaded gasoline market hasa manner which resulted in a generalsignificant increase in the discount rate used at the end of decline2008 from that used at the end of 2007. Similar future changes in volume termsPlan asset values and assumptions, including improving member mortality assumptions, will affect the actuarial valuation and our pension calculations and may adversely impact future cash contributions required to be made by the Company, including the 10 year deficit recovery plan, and pension cost recognized in recent yearsthe income statement. We currently do not however intend to modify the provisions of between 10%the Plan or investment strategy for the Plan assets. The pension obligation is long-term in nature as is the investment philosophy pursued.

Movements in the underlying plan asset value and 25% per annum. Net salesPBO are dependent on actual return on investments and gross profitpay awards as well as our assumptions in respect of our Octane Additives business accounted for approximately 16%the discount rate, annual member mortality rates, future return on assets, future pay escalation, future pension increases and 24%, respectively, of our consolidated sales and gross profitfuture inflation. We develop these assumptions after considering advice from a major global actuarial consulting firm. A change in 2007, and we expect bothany one of these percentagesassumptions could impact the plan asset value, PBO and pension cost recognized in the income statement. Such changes could impact our operating results and financial position. A 0.25% change in either the discount rate assumption, or level of price inflation assumption, would change the PBO by approximately $19 million and the net pension charge for 2008 by approximately $1.4 million.

In addition, should future investment returns prove insufficient to declinemeet future obligations, or should future obligations increase due to actuarial factors or changes in fiscal year 2008. The predicted remaining sales of the Octane Additives business are now concentrated in a relatively small number of customers and therefore may decline with unpredictable volatility and severity. Should one or more of these customers choose for economic, environmental, political or other reasons to cease using TEL as an octane enhancer earlier than has been anticipated,pension legislation, then the Company’sCompany may be required to make additional cash contributions. This could have a material impact on future operating income and cash flows from operating activities would be adversely impacted. There could also be an accelerated impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill as the forecast discounted cash flows from that business would be reduced. The Company anticipates that eventually all countries in the world will stop the use of TEL in automotive gasoline. The Company expects that it will cease all sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline at some time in the next several years.activities.

 

We face risks related to our foreign operations that may adversely affect our business.have additional tax liabilities.

 

We serve global markets and accordingly operate in some countries which do not have stable economies or governments. Specifically, we trade in countries experiencing political and economic instability in the Middle East and Asia Pacific. Our international operations are subject to internationalincome taxes and state taxes in the U.S., as well as numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, risks including, but not limited to, unsettled political conditions, expropriation, importthere are many transactions and export restrictions, exchange controls, national and regional labor strikes, taxes, government royalties and restrictions on repatriation of earningscalculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are currently under tax audit by various jurisdictions’ tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are

or proceeds from liquidated assetsreasonable, the final determination of foreign subsidiaries. The occurrence oftax audits and any orrelated litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in our financial statements. This could have a combination, of these events could adversely impactmaterial effect on our results of operations,net income, financial position andor cash flows from operating activities.

 

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The Company generates an element of its revenues and incurs some operating costs in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In addition, the financial position and results of operations of some of our foreign subsidiaries are reported in the relevant local currency and then translated to U.S. dollars at the applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. Changes in exchange rates between these foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect the recorded levels of our assets and liabilities, to the extent such figures reflect the inclusion of foreign assets and liabilities that are translated into U.S. dollars for presentation in our financial statements, as well as our results of operations.

 

The primary foreign currencies in which we have exchange rate fluctuation exposure are the European Union euro and British pound sterling. The Company cannot accurately predict the nature or extent of future exchange rate variability. While the Company takes steps to manage currency exposure by entering into hedging transactions, this cannot eliminate all exposure to future exchange rate variability. Exchange rates between these currencies and the U.S. dollar have fluctuated significantly in recent years and may continue to do so in the future, which could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.

 

The inability of counterparties to meet their contractual obligations could have a substantial adverse impact on our results of operations.

The Company sells a range of specialty chemicals to customers around the world. Credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation and account monitoring procedures are used to minimize bad debt risk. Collateral is not generally required. The Company uses derivatives, including interest rate swaps, commodity swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts, in the normal course of business to manage market risks. The Company enters into derivative instruments with a diversified group of major financial institutions in order to monitor the exposure to non-performance of such instruments. The Company has in place a financing facility with a syndicate of banks.

The Company remains subject to market and credit risks including the ability of counterparties to meet their contractual obligations and the potential non-performance of counterparties to deliver contracted commodities or services at the contracted price. Due to the recent disruptions in the credit and global financial markets the ability of counterparties to meet their contractual obligations may be reduced and this could have an adverse impact on future net income and cash flows from operating and financing activities.

Our reliance on a small number of significant customers may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our principal customers are major multinational and state owned oil companies. The oil industry is characterized by concentration of a few large participants as a result of consolidation. The loss of a significant customer or a material reduction in purchases by a significant customer could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows from operating activities.

A disruption in the supply of raw materials or transportation services would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The chemical industry and transportation industry are in a situation where the supply and demand of both transportation services and the supply and demand of raw materials are broadly in balance. When we identify a situation where an imbalance may occur or is occurring we may build certain product inventories of strategic importance as we have done in 2008. Any significant disruption in supply could affect our ability to obtain raw materials or transportation services. This could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

Sharp and unexpected fluctuations in the cost of our raw materials and energy could adversely affect our profit margins.

We use a variety of raw materials, chemicals and energy in our manufacturing and blending processes. Many of the raw materials that we use are derived from petrochemical-based feedstocks which can be subject to periods of rapid and significant price instability. These fluctuations in price can be caused by political instability in oil producing nations and elsewhere, or other factors influencing global supply and demand over which we have no or little control. Innospec has entered hedging arrangements for certain raw materials, but does not typically enter into hedging arrangements for all raw materials, chemicals or energy costs. Should costs of raw materials, chemicals or energy increase, and should Innospec’s businesses not be able to pass on these cost increases to our customers, then operating margins and cash flows from operating activities would be adversely impacted. Should raw material prices increase significantly, then the Company’s need for working capital could increase which would adversely impact cash flows from operating activities.

Our reliance on a small number of significant stockholders may have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

Recent disruptions in the credit markets, and concerns about global economic growth, have had a significant adverse impact on global financial markets and contributed to a decline in our stock price and corresponding market capitalization. Almost fifty per cent of the Company’s common stock is held by three stockholders. A decision by any of these stockholders to sell all or a significant part of its stockholding in the Company as a consequence of current economic conditions or otherwise could result in a significant decline in the Company’s stock price which could in turn adversely impact our ability to access equity markets.

Approximately twenty per cent of the Company’s common stock is currently held or controlled by Tontine Capital Partners, L.P., Tontine 25 Overseas Master Fund, L.P., Tontine Capital Management L.L.C., Tontine Capital Overseas Master Fund, L.P., Tontine Capital Overseas GP, L.L.C. and Jeffrey L. Gendell (“Gendell et al”). On November 10, 2008, Gendell et al jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC in which they reported that they will begin to explore alternatives for the disposition of their equity interests in the Company’s common stock which at that date aggregated to 4,828,345 shares.

We face risks related to our foreign operations that may adversely affect our business.

We serve global markets and accordingly operate in some countries which do not have stable economies or governments. Specifically, we trade in countries experiencing political and economic instability in the Middle East and Asia Pacific. Our international operations are subject to international business risks including, but not limited to, unsettled political conditions, expropriation, import and export restrictions, exchange controls, national and regional labor strikes, taxes, government royalties and restrictions on repatriation of earnings or proceeds from liquidated assets of foreign subsidiaries. The occurrence of any, or a combination, of these events could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our future performance and cash flows.

 

Our intellectual property, including trademarks, patents and licenses, forms a significant part of the Company’s competitive strengths. We therefore depend on our ability to develop and protect our intellectual property rights to distinguish our products from those of our competitors. Failure to do so may result in the loss of valuable technologies, or our having to pay other companies for infringing their intellectual property rights. Measures taken by us to protect our intellectual property may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. We may also face patent infringement claims from our competitors which may result in substantial litigation costs, claims for damages or a tarnishing of our reputation even if we are successful in defending these claims, which may cause our customers to switch to our competitors. The occurrence of any, or a combination, of these events could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

 

We are subject to extensive government regulation.

 

We are subject to regulation by local, state, federal and foreign governmental authorities. In some circumstances these authorities must approve our products, manufacturing processes and facilities before we may sell certain products. Many of the Company’s products are required to be registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and with comparable

governmental agencies elsewhere. We are also subject to ongoing reviews of our products, manufacturing processes and facilities by governmental authorities including the requirement to produce product data.

 

In order to obtain regulatory approval of certain new products we must, amongst other things, demonstrate to the relevant authority that the product is safe and effective for its intended

uses, and that we are capable of manufacturing the product in accordance with current regulations. This approval process can be costly, time consuming, and subject to unanticipated and significant delays. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that approvals will be granted on a timely basis, or at all. Any delay in obtaining, or any failure to obtain or maintain, these approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new products and to generate income from those products.

 

New laws and regulations may be introduced in the future that could result in additional compliance costs and prevent or inhibit the development, distribution and sale of our products. The European Union (“EU”) has approved additional legislation known as the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemical Substances Regulations (“REACH”) which requires most of the Company’s products to be registered with EU Authorities. Under this legislation the Company has to demonstrate the continuing safety of its products. During this registration period the Company will incur expense to test and register its products. The Company estimates that the cost of complying with REACH will be approximately $10 million incurred over the next 4 years. While the Company expects that its products will be approved for registration after testing it is possible that certain products may not be registered if the test data proves unsatisfactory. In such an outcome some of the Company’s products may be restricted or prohibited in the EU. This could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

The Company has made a voluntary disclosure to U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) regarding dealings with Cuba by certain of the Company’s current and former subsidiaries. The Company is cooperating with the SEC, DOJ and the DOJSFO regarding its participation in the OFFP.OFFP and related investigations. The Company has made provision for probable future legal and other professional expenses and/or potential penalties in respect of these matters to the extent this is feasible.they can be reasonably estimated. However should the Company’s estimates prove to be inadequate then this could have a material impact upon the Company’s operating income and cash flows from operating activities.

 

We could be adversely affected by technological changes in our industry.

Our ability to maintain or enhance our technological capabilities, develop and market products and applications that meet changing customer requirements, and successfully anticipate or respond to technological changes in a cost effective and timely manner will likely impact our future business success. Technological changes in some or all of our customers’ products or processes may make our products obsolete and accordingly adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Legal proceedings and other claims could impose substantial costs on us.

 

WeIn addition to other matters described elsewhere, we are occasionally involved in legal proceedings that result from, and are incidental to, the conduct of our business, including product liability claims. We have insurance coverage to mitigate any potential damages in any such proceedings, however if our insurance did not cover such claims, then this could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Environmental matters could have a substantial adverse impact on our results of operations.

 

The Company is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning emissions to the air, discharges to land and water

and the generation, handling, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste and other materials. The Company is also required to obtain various environmental permits and licenses many of which require periodic notification and renewal.

 

The Company operates on a number of manufacturing sites. The Company’s historic operations, and the historic operations of companies who have previously operated on sites that the Company has acquired, entail the risk of environmental contamination of the properties that it owns or has owned. This may result in fines or criminal sanctions against the Company or may entail the Company in material costs to remediate historic contamination.

 

The Company further anticipates that certain production facilities may cease production in the medium to long-term. On closure of some of these production operations in the future, the Company expects to be subject to environmental laws that will require production facilities to be safely decommissioned and a degree of environmental remediation to be undertaken. The degree of environmental remediation will depend upon the plans for the future use of the operating sites that are affected and the environmental legislation in force at the time. The Company has currently made a decommissioning and remediation provision based on the Company’s current obligations, the current plans for those sites and current environmental legislation. Should the Company’s future plans for the sites change or should environmental legislation change then these provisions may prove inadequate and this will have an adverse impact on future operating income and cash flows from operating activities.

 

The terms of our credit agreementsfinance facility may restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or to otherwise expand our business.

 

The Company’s existing credit facilities containnew finance facility contains restrictive clauses which may constrain our activities and limit our operational and financial flexibility. These clausesThe new facility obliges the lenders to comply with a request for utilization of finance unless there is an event of default outstanding. Events of default are defined in the finance facility and include a material adverse change to our business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations. The new facility contains a number of restrictions that limit our ability, amongamongst other matters,things, and subject to increasecertain limited exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, usepledge our assets as security, in other transactions,guarantee obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, acquire assets or investments, and pay dividends or repurchase common stock.materially change our line of business.

 

The current credit facilities requireIn addition, the new finance facility requires the Company to meet certain financial ratios including net debt to EBITDA (as defined in the creditfinance facility) and net interest expense to EBITAEBITDA (as defined in the creditfinance facility). The ability to meet these financial covenants depends upon the future operating performance of the businesses. If the Company fails to meet target covenants then it would be in technical default on the borrowingfinance facility and the maturity of the outstanding debt could be accelerated unless it was able to obtain waivers from the lenders.

Our Octane Additives business could decline faster than expected.

 

Worldwide use of TEL has declined since 1973 following the enactment of the U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 and similar legislation in other countries. The trend of countries exiting the leaded gasoline market has resulted in a general rate of decline in volume terms in recent years of between 10% and 25% per annum. Net sales and gross profit of our Octane Additives business accounted for approximately 10% and 15%, respectively, of our consolidated sales and gross profit in 2008, and we expect both of these percentages to decline again in fiscal year 2009. The remaining sales of the Octane Additives business are now concentrated in a relatively small number of customers and therefore may decline with unpredictable volatility and severity. Should one or more of these customers choose for economic, environmental, political or other reasons to cease using TEL as an octane enhancer earlier than has been anticipated, then the Company’s future operating income and cash flows from operating activities would be adversely impacted. There could also be an accelerated impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill as the forecast discounted cash flows from that business would be reduced. The Company anticipates that eventually all countries in the world will stop the use of TEL in automotive gasoline. The Company expects to need to refinance somethat it will cease all sales of the existing debt at the end of the remaining one and a half year term of the current borrowing facility. Should the CompanyTEL for use in automotive gasoline in 2012.

We may not be able to secure refinancingconsummate, finance or successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, which could hinder our strategy or result in unanticipated expenses and losses.

It is part of our stated strategy that we intend to pursue strategic acquisitions and other opportunities to complement and expand our existing businesses. Our ability to implement this component of our strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisitions or other opportunities and financial resources, including our available cash and borrowing capacity and the financial markets. The success of these transactions will depend on satisfactory terms atour ability to integrate assets and personnel acquired in these transactions, apply our internal controls processes to these acquired businesses, and cooperate with our strategic partners. The expense incurred in consummating acquisitions or other opportunities, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition, or our failure to integrate businesses successfully, could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that point thiswould otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations. Furthermore, we may not realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipate when we first enter a transaction. Any of these risks could adversely impact continuing operations.

our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Our business is subject to the risk of production or transportation interruptions, the occurrence of any of which would adversely affect our results of operations.

 

We are subject to hazards common to chemical manufacturing, blending, storage, handling and transportation including fires, explosions, mechanical failure, transportation interruptions, remediation, chemical spills and the release or discharge of toxic or hazardous substances. These hazards could result in loss of life, property damage, environmental contamination and

temporary or permanent production cessation. Any, or a combination, of these factors could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

We may be required to make additional contributions to the defined benefit pension scheme that we operate in the United Kingdom.

The Company operates a contributory defined benefit plan in the United Kingdom. At December 31, 2007 the underlying plan asset value and projected benefit obligation were $889.1 million and $854.3 million, respectively, resulting in a surplus of $34.8 million. The plan is closed to new entrants, without trustee discretion, but has a large number of deferred and current pensioners. Should future investment returns prove insufficient to meet future obligations, or should future obligations increase due to actuarial factors or changes in pension legislation, then the Company may be required to make additional cash contributions. This could have a material impact on future operating income and cash flows from operating activities.

 

Domestic or international natural disasters or terrorist attacks may disrupt our operations, decrease the demand for our products or otherwise have an adverse impact on our business.

 

Chemical related assets, and U.S. corporations such as ourselves, may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other possible targets in the U.S., United Kingdom and throughout the world. The occurrence of such events cannot be predicted though they can be expected to continue to adversely impact the economy in general and our specific markets. The resulting damage from such an event could include loss of life, property damage or site closure. Any, or a combination, of these factors could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

 

Item 1BUnresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

Item 2Properties

 

A summary of the Company’s principal properties is shown in the following table. Each of these properties is owned by the Company except where otherwise noted:

 

Location

  Business and Business Segment  Operations
Newark, Delaware, U.S.(1)  Innospec Inc. – Corporate  Corporate Headquarters

Ellesmere Port,

United Kingdom

  Innospec Inc. and Innospec Limited – Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals and Octane Additives  

European Headquarters

Business Teams

Manufacturing/Administration

Research & Development

Fuel Technology Center

Widnes, United Kingdom  Innospec Widnes Limited (previously known as Aroma Fine Chemicals Limited) – Active Chemicals  Manufacturing/Administration
Herne, Germany  Innospec Deutschland GmbH – Fuel Specialties  Manufacturing/Administration
Leuna, Germany  Innospec Leuna GmbH – Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals  Manufacturing/Administration
Vernon, France  Innospec France SA – Fuel Specialties  Manufacturing/Administration
Zug, Switzerland(1)   Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH – Octane Additives  Sales/Administration
Littleton, Colorado(1)   Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC – Fuel Specialties  Sales/Administration
Newark, Delaware(1) Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC – Fuel Specialties

Sales/Administration

Research & Development

High Point, North Carolina  Innospec Active Chemicals LLC – Active Chemicals  Manufacturing/Administration
Spencer, North Carolina  Innospec Active Chemicals LLC – Active Chemicals  Manufacturing/Administration

(1)

Leased property

 

The corporate headquarters of Innospec Inc. is located at 220 Continental Drive, Newark, DE 19713. The principal executive offices of Innospec Inc. are located at Innospec Manufacturing Park, Oil Sites Road, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, United Kingdom, CH65 4EY.

 

Production Capacity

 

We believe that our plants and supply agreements are sufficient to meet expected future sales levels. Operating rates of the plants are generally flexible and varied with product mix and normal sales swings. Specifically, we believe our Octane Additives manufacturing site at Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom can be managed in a flexible and cost effective manner in order to meet anticipated future demand. We believe that all of our facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition.

Item 3Legal Proceedings

 

Oil for Food Program and related investigations

 

On February 7, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified the Company that it had commenced an investigation to determine whether any violations of law had occurred in connection with certain transactions conducted by or involving the Company, including those conducted by its wholly owned indirect Swiss subsidiary, Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH (“Alcor”), a Swiss company, under the United Nations Oil for Food Program (“OFFP”) between June 1, 1999 and December 31, 2003. As part of its investigation, the SEC issued a subpoena requiring the production of certain documents, including documents relating to these transactions, by the Company and Alcor. Upon receipt of the SEC’s notification and initial subpoena, the Company undertook a review of its participation in the OFFP.

On October 10, 2007 and November 1, 2007, the SEC served two additional subpoenas on the Company. These additional subpoenas required the production of documents relating notablyprimarily to the OFFP, but also relating to transactions conducted by the Company or its subsidiaries with state owned or state controlled entities between June 1, 1999 and the date of such subpoenas, relating to itsconcerning the use of foreign agents and the possibility of extra-contractual payments made to secure business with foreign governmental entities.entities in the context of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other laws. In a co-ordinated investigation, the Company haswas also been contactednotified by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding the possibility of violations of relevantby the Company or its subsidiaries arising under other laws in the areas contained instemming from matters covered by the SEC subpoenasinvestigation as well as additionalcertain preliminary inquiries regarding compliance with anti-trust laws relatingapplicable to the U.S. and international tetra ethyltetra-ethyl lead markets. The subjects into which the SEC and DOJ have inquired include areas that involveconcern certain former and current executives of the Company, including the current CEO. The Company, and its officers and directors, are cooperating with the SEC and DOJ investigations.

On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company formed a committee comprised of the chairmen of the Board, the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, respectively, all of whom arewere independent directors. Counsel(The chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee retired as a director of the Company effective May 6, 2008, but his services have been retained in an independent capacity as a member of the committee). External counsel to the Company, providing assistancereporting to the committee has, on behalf of the committee, conducted and will continue to conduct an investigation into the circumstances giving rise to the SEC and DOJ investigations. Counsel will reportExternal counsel reports directly to the committee and will assistassists in connection with communications and interactions with the SEC and DOJ. While

On March 5, 2008, a letter was received by the Company from the DOJ in which a request for a wider and more detailed range of documents was made. The Company and its officers and directors intend to continue to co-operate with the SEC and DOJ.

Separately, on May 21, 2008, the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) notified Innospec Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, that it had commenced an

investigation into certain contracts involving British companies under the OFFP. As part of this investigation, the SFO has asked the Company to produce documents in respect of the Company’s participation in the OFFP between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2003. Following receipt of the SFO’s notice the Company has instructed external legal counsel to advise and assist in relation to the investigation and the Company and its directors and officers intend to co-operate with the SFO. On October 16, 2008, the Company was further notified that the scope of the SFO’s investigation would extend to matters relating to potential bribery involving overseas commercial agents that are already in the large part the subject of the ongoing DOJ and SEC investigations.

The outcome of these investigations remains uncertain to the Company. On the facts available to us it is uncertain,not yet possible to form any reasonable estimate of the potential disgorgement, penalties and fine payments, either by reference to a range of possible outcomes or by reference to the lower end of such a range of outcomes. The amount of any disgorgements, penalties or fines that the Company could face would depend on a number of companies involved in the OFFP investigations have been requiredeventual factors which are not currently known to disgorge profits and pay civil fines and penalties up to $30 million. As a result of information discovered in the course of the investigation, we expect that we will be required to disgorge profits and pay fines and penalties that could be of similar magnitude. Any settlement of the SEC and DOJ inquiries relating to matters beyond the OFFP could require the Company, including findings by relevant authorities regarding the amount, nature and scope of any improper payments, the amount of any pecuniary gain involved, the Company’s ability to make significant additional disgorgements, penaltypay, and fine payments. However at this time management is not able to predict with certainty the level of such fines and penalties. co-operation provided to government authorities during the investigations.

Because of the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome of these investigations and the costs to the Company of responding and participating in these on-going investigations,them, no assurance can be given that the ultimate costs incurred and sanctions that may be imposed upon us will not have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s results of operations, financial position andand/or cash flows from operating activities.

At December 31, 2007 we havehad accrued $3.7 million in respect of estimated probable future legal and other professional expenses in respect of this matter and have provided no additional accruals in respect of the investigations. As part of our continuing commitment to co-operate and comply with the SEC and DOJ investigations, including the request for this matter.documents set out in the DOJ letter dated March 5, 2008, we accrued a further $6.8 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 in respect of estimated probable future legal and other professional expenses. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company provided no additional accruals in respect of these matters.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008 the Company accrued an additional $8.7 million in respect of estimated probable legal and other professional fees and expenses. The provision for probable future legal and other professional fees and expenses amounted to $3.4 million at December 31, 2008. These accruals are made on the basis of the Company’s then current best estimate, working in consultation with the committee of the Board of Directors, external legal counsel to the Company and its other professional advisors. Should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect or should any of the DOJ, SEC and/or the SFO alter the scope of the investigations, then the actual costs incurred by the Company could differ materially from current estimates.

The Company continues to keep the amount of such accrual provisions under review as it has been doing, including through working with the committee of the Board and external legal counsel and other professional advisors.

Bycosin Disposal

 

Voluntary disclosure of possible violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Given the international scope of its operations, the Company is subject to laws of many different jurisdictions, including laws relating to the imposition of restrictions on trade and investment with various entities, persons and countries, some of which laws are conflicting. In 2004 the Company reviewed, as it does periodically, aspects of its operations in respect of such restrictions, and determined to dispose of certain non-core, non-U.S. subsidiaries of Bycosin AB. Bycosin’s non-U.S. subsidiaries had been engaged in transactions and activities involving Cuban persons and entities before the acquisition of the Bycosin Group by the Company in June 2001, and such subsidiaries were continuing to engage in such transactions and activities at the time of the disposal of the non-core Fuel Specialties business and related assets in November 2004. On November 15, 2004, Bycosin AB, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company organized under the laws of Sweden (now known as Innospec Sweden AB, the “Seller”), entered into a Business and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Pesdo Swedcap Holdings AB (the “Purchaser”), Håkan Byström and others as the Purchaser’s guarantors, and Octel Petroleum Specialties Limited (now known as Innospec Fuel Specialties Limited) as the Seller’s guarantor, and completed the all-cash transaction contemplated thereby (together with related transactions, the “Transaction”). The Agreement provided for, amongamongst other things: (i) the disposal of certain non-core Fuel Specialties business and related manufacturing and other assets of the Seller; and (ii) the supply and distribution of certain power products to certain geographic regions. The net consideration paid by the Purchaser was approximately US$2.9$2.9 million.

 

Following completion of the Transaction, the Company made a voluntary disclosure to the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) regarding transactions and activities engaged in by certain non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company. Disclosures, amongst other items, included that the aggregate monetary value of the transactions involving Cuban persons and entities conducted by the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries since January 1999 iswas approximately $26.6 million.

 

At this time, however, management believes that it would be speculative and potentially misleading for the Company to predict the specific nature or amount of penalties that OFAC might eventually assess against it. While penalties could be assessed on different bases, if OFAC assessed penalties against the Company on a “performance of contracts basis”, the applicable regulations provide for penalties, in the case of civil violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 CFR. Part 515) (“CACR”), of the lesser of $65,000 per violation or the value of the contract. Since January 1999, non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company have entered into 43 contracts with Cuban entities, each of which could be considered a separate violation of the CACR by OFAC. OFAC may take the position that the CACR should be interpreted or applied in a different manner, potentially even to permit the assessment of penalties equal to or greater than the value of the business conducted with Cuban persons or entities.

The Company has considered the range of possible outcomes and potential penalties payable. In accordance with the Company’s accounting policies, provision has been made for management’s current best estimate of the potential liability, including anticipated legal costs. However, should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the actual outcome could differ materially from management’s current expectations. Management is not able to estimate the amount of any additional loss, if any.

 

If the Company or its subsidiaries (current or former) were found not to have complied with the CACR, the Company believes that it could be subject to fines or other civil or criminal penalties which could be material.

 

Patent Actions

 

The Company is actively opposing certain third party patents in various regions of the world. The actions are part of the Company’s ongoing management of its intellectual property portfolio. The Company does not believe that any of these actions will have a material effect on the financial positioncondition or results of operations of the Company.

 

Other Legal Matters

 

We are involved from time to time in claims and legal proceedings that result from, and are incidental to, the conduct of our business including product liability claims. There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party, or of which any of their property is subject, other than ordinary, routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

 

Item 4Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.2008.

PART II

 

Item 5Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The following information has been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.

 

Market Information and Holders

 

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ (symbol – IOSP). As of February 15, 200813, 2009 there were approximately 1,5631,300 registered holders of the common stock. The following table shows the closing high and low prices of our common stock for each of the last eight quarters.

 

  First
Quarter

  Second
Quarter

  Third
Quarter

  Fourth
Quarter

2008

            

High

  $22.60  $25.29  $23.49  $11.05

Low

  $14.10  $18.89  $11.60  $4.54
  First
Quarter

  Second
Quarter

  Third
Quarter

  Fourth
Quarter

2007

                        

High

  $30.54  $31.06  $31.82  $23.91  $30.54  $31.06  $31.82  $23.91

Low

  $22.15  $26.30  $18.72  $16.26  $22.15  $26.30  $18.72  $16.26

2006

            

High

  $13.05  $13.61  $15.07  $24.20

Low

  $8.38  $11.44  $11.21  $14.70

 

Dividends

 

In line with its policy of semi-annual consideration of a dividend the Company declared the following cash dividends for the two years ended December 31, 2007.2008.

 

Date declared


  

Stockholders of record


  

Date paid


  

Amount per share


February 16, 2006

February 23, 2006April 1, 2006  4 cents

August 18, 2006

September 1, 2006October 1, 2006  4 cents

February 26, 2007

  

March 5, 2007

  April 2, 2007    4.5 cents

August 14, 2007

  

September 4, 2007

  October 9, 2007    4.5 cents

February 22, 2008

March 14, 2008

April 4, 2008  5 cents

August 14, 2008

September 1, 2008

October 6, 2008  5 cents

In addition, on February 22, 2008 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had declared a semi-annual dividend of 5 cents per share payable on April 4, 2008 to stockholders of record as of March 14, 2008.

 

The refinancingfinance facility entered into on December 13, 2005 allowsallowed a maximum dividend of $2.5 million per annum in 2005, plus 10% annual growth thereafter, provided that no default

has had occurred or would resulthave resulted from such payment. TheIn addition, the Company maywas allowed to repurchase its own common stock provided that this willit did not affect compliance with the financial covenants in that facility. On February 6, 2009 we entered into a new three-year finance facility which contains no restrictive covenants with respect to dividends and the

Company is allowed to repurchase its own common stock provided that it does not affect compliance with the financial covenants in this facility. This new finance facility replaced the previous finance facility which was in place at December 31, 2008.

 

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Period


 (a) Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased


 (b) Average
Price Paid
per Share


 (c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part
of the Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs


  (d) Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs


Carried forward

 —    —   —    $4.1 million

October 1 - October 31

 —    —   —     $4.1 million

November 1 - November 30

 —    —   —     $4.1 million

December 1 - December 31

 142,979 $17.38 142,979  $1.6 million
  
    
    

Total

 142,979 $17.38 142,979  $1.6 million
  
    
    

No purchases of equity securities by the issuer or affiliated purchasers were made during the quarter.

 

Repurchases of common stock are held as treasury shares unless reissued under equity compensation plans.

 

On December 4, 2006During January 2008 the Company announced that the Boardre-purchased 104,300 shares at a cost of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of common stock, dependent on market conditions, and a further stock re-purchase plan under Rule 10b5-1 to repurchase an additional $2.5 million of common stock. This plan commenced on December 5, 2006 and completed on February 9, 2007.

$1.6 million. On February 26, 2007March 3, 2008 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized a further stock re-purchase plan under Rule 10b5-1 to repurchase up to an additional $5.0$8.0 million of common stock. This plan commenced on February 28, 2007March 3, 2008 and completed on May 4, 2007.

On May 14, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized a further stock re-purchase plan under Rule 10b5-1 to repurchase up to an additional $3.0 million of common stock. This plan commenced on May 14, 2007 and completed on June 19, 2007.

On August 10, 2007 theApril 29, 2008. The Company re-purchased 41,000379,792 shares at a cost of $0.9 million.$8.0 million under this plan.

 

On August 14 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized a further stock re-purchase plan under Rule 10b5-1 to repurchase up to an additional $6.5 million of common stock. This plan commenced on August 13, 2007 and completed on August 22, 2007.

On December 7, 2007 the Company re-purchased 142,979 shares at a cost of $2.5 million.

During January 2008 the Company re-purchased 104,300 shares at a cost of $1.6 million.

The Company has authorized securities for issuance under equity compensation plans. The information contained in Item 12the table entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” under the heading “Shares Authorized for Issuance Under Equity“Equity Compensation Plans” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. The current limit for the total amount of shares which can be issued or awarded under the Company’s five share option plans is 1,790,000.

 

The Company has not, within the last three years, made any sales of unregistered securities.

Stock Price Performance Graph

 

The “Stock Price Performance Graph” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 6, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference. The graph below compares the cumulative total return to stockholders on the common stockCommon Stock of the Company,Corporation, S&P 500 Index, and NASDAQ Composite Index and Russell 2000 Index since December 31, 2002,2003, assuming a $100 investment and the re-investment of any dividends thereafter.

Value of $100 Investment made December 31, 2003*

   2003

  2004

  2005

  2006

  2007

  2008

Innospec Inc

  100  106.25  83.75  240.21  177.71  61.35

S&P 500 Index

  100  108.99  112.29  127.55  132.06  81.23

NASDAQ Composite

  100  108.59  110.08  120.56  132.39  78.72

Russell 2000

  100  117.00  120.88  141.43  137.55  89.68

*Excludes purchase commissions

Item 6Selected Financial Data

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

 

(dollar amounts in millions

except financial ratios and per share data)


 2007

 2006

 2005 (1)

 2004 (1)

 2003 (1)

   2008

 2007

 2006

 2005 (1)

 2004 (1)

 

Summary of performance

    

Net sales

 $602.4  $532.1  $564.8  $496.9  $471.8   $640.5  $602.4  $532.1  $564.8  $496.9 

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

  (12.1)  (36.7)  (134.4)  (40.7)  —      (3.7)  (12.1)  (36.7)  (134.4)  (40.7)

Operating income/(loss)

  47.9   31.9   (97.7)  41.7   97.9    43.6   47.9   31.9   (97.7)  41.7 

Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interest

  47.8   31.9   (117.9)  34.0   81.6    18.9   47.8   31.9   (117.9)  34.0 

Minority interest

  (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.2)  (2.0)  (4.3)   (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.2)  (2.0)

Income taxes

  (18.2)  (20.4)  (4.2)  (20.1)  (23.2)   (6.3)  (18.2)  (20.4)  (4.2)  (20.1)

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

  29.5   11.4   (122.3)  11.9   54.1    12.5   29.5   11.4   (122.3)  11.9 

Net income/(loss)

  29.5   11.4   (123.7)  6.2   51.8    12.5   29.5   11.4   (123.7)  6.2 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  47.9   36.4   43.8   62.4   85.2    14.4   47.9   36.4   43.8   62.4 

Financial position at year end

    

Total assets

  551.1   569.0   675.3   790.6   741.6    494.3   551.1   569.0   675.3   790.6 

Long-term debt (including current portion)

  81.0   148.1   144.6   124.3   104.6    73.0   81.0   148.1   144.6   124.3 

Stockholders’ equity

 $271.5  $225.0  $314.4  $445.8  $430.2   $229.3  $271.5  $225.0  $314.4  $445.8 

Financial ratios

    

Net income/(loss) as a percent of sales

  4.9   2.1   (21.9)  1.2   11.0    2.0   4.9   2.1   (21.9)  1.2 

Effective income tax rate as a percent(2)

  38.2   64.2   (3.5)  62.8   30.0    33.5   38.2   64.2   (3.5)  62.8 

Current ratio(3)

  1.6   2.1   1.7   1.2   1.6    1.4   1.6   2.1   1.7   1.2 

Share data(4)

    

Earnings/(loss) per share

    

– Basic

  1.23   0.47   (5.00)  0.25   2.17    0.53   1.23   0.47   (5.00)  0.25 

– Fully diluted

  1.19   0.45   (5.00)  0.24   2.06    0.51   1.19   0.45   (5.00)  0.24 

Earnings/(loss) per share from continuing operations

    

– Basic

  1.23   0.47   (4.94)  0.48   2.27    0.53   1.23   0.47   (4.94)  0.48 

– Fully diluted

  1.19   0.45   (4.94)  0.46   2.15    0.51   1.19   0.45   (4.94)  0.46 

Dividend paid per share

  0.09   0.08   0.07   0.06   0.025    0.10   0.09   0.08   0.07   0.06 

Shares outstanding (basic, thousands)

    

– At year end

  23,777   23,805   24,650   24,675   24,119    23,598   23,777   23,805   24,650   24,675 

– Average during year

  23,920   24,141   24,737   24,690   23,850    23,595   23,920   24,141   24,737   24,690 

Closing stock price

    

– High

  31.82   24.20   10.26   16.00   10.24    25.29   31.82   24.20   10.26   16.00 

– Low

  16.26   8.38   7.30   9.31   6.28    4.54   16.26   8.38   7.30   9.31 

– At year end

  17.16   23.28   8.14   10.41   9.85    5.89   17.16   23.28   8.14   10.41 

 

(1)2005 2004 and 20032004 comparatives have been restated in order to reflect discontinued operations.
(2)The effective tax rate is calculated as a percentage of income before income taxes.
(3)Current ratio is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities.
(4)On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The table above has been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.

QUARTERLY SUMMARY (UNAUDITED)

 

(dollar amounts in millions

except per share data)


  First
Quarter


 Second
Quarter


 Third
Quarter


  Fourth
Quarter


   First
Quarter


  Second
Quarter


 Third
Quarter


 Fourth
Quarter


2008

      

Net sales

  $168.7  $145.3  $158.5  $168.0

Gross profit

   51.7   41.1   43.4   50.2

Operating income(1)

   12.5   4.4   4.7   22.0

Net income/(loss)(2)

   7.3   0.8   (0.6)  5.0

Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities

  $19.8  $(16.6) $(12.5) $23.7

Per common share:

      

Earnings/(loss) – basic

  $0.31  $0.03  $(0.03) $0.21

– fully diluted(1)(3)

  $0.30  $0.03  $(0.03) $0.20

2007

            

Net sales

  $145.3  $141.4  $143.0  $172.7   $145.3  $141.4  $143.0  $172.7

Gross profit

   49.7   47.8   45.6   54.3    49.7   47.8   45.6   54.3

Operating income

   13.2   10.8   10.6   13.3 

Operating income(4)

   13.2   10.8   10.6   13.3

Net income

   6.0   6.8   5.6   11.1    6.0   6.8   5.6   11.1

Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities

  $9.0  $(6.8) $20.1  $25.6   $9.0  $(6.8) $20.1  $25.6

Per common share:

            

Earnings – basic(1)

  $0.25  $0.28  $0.23  $0.46 

– fully diluted(1)(3)

  $0.24  $0.27  $0.23  $0.45 

2006

      

Net sales

  $124.3  $119.4  $143.7  $144.7 

Gross profit

   46.5   42.1   51.6   46.5 

Operating income

   6.6   3.9   19.8   1.6 

Net income/(loss)

   0.6   1.0   10.5   (0.7)

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

  $(7.7) $8.4  $19.6  $16.1 

Per common share:

      

Earnings/(loss) – basic(1)

  $0.02  $0.04  $0.44  $(0.03)

– fully diluted(1) (2)

  $0.02  $0.04  $0.42  $(0.03)

Earnings – basic(5)

  $0.25  $0.28  $0.23  $0.46

– fully diluted(5)

  $0.24  $0.27  $0.23  $0.45

 

NOTES

 

(1)Unusual items during the year ended December 31, 2008 comprised the following: legal and other professional expenses relating to the Oil for Food Program and related investigations of $6.8 million and $8.7 million in the first and third quarters, respectively; foreign exchange gains/(losses) of $0.5 million gain, ($1.0) million loss, ($5.0) million loss and ($13.5) million loss in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively; impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill of $1.1 million, $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $0.5 million in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively; and restructuring charges of $0.5 million, $1.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively.

(2)The financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2008, as presented in the earnings release on October 30, 2008, were agreed with our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), prior to the release. These financial results included the reversal of contract related provisions of $6.3 million, or $4.5 million after income taxes, to the income statement together with related disclosure. Subsequent to the issue of this earnings release further consideration was given to the reversal of the contract related provisions by PwC and the Company and it was concluded that an alternative accounting treatment would be to offset them against a related intangible asset. After due consideration, including advice received from PwC, the Company determined that the most appropriate accounting treatment would be to exclude the reversal of contract related provisions from net income and offset them against the related intangible asset. This alternative accounting treatment resulted in a net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and lower future amortization charges in respect of the related asset. The Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 reflected this alternative accounting treatment.

(3)In view of the fact that a net loss of $0.6 million was made in the third quarter, 2008, the basic and fully diluted loss per common share are the same for that quarter.

(4)Unusual items during the year ended December 31, 2007 comprised the following: legal and other professional expenses relating to the Oil for Food Program and related investigations of $0.2 million and $4.4 million in the third and fourth quarters, respectively; foreign exchange gains/(losses) of $0.3 million gain, $1.8 million gain, $1.5 million gain and $3.9 million gain in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively; impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill of $4.4 million, $3.3 million, $2.4 million and $2.0 million in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively; and restructuring charges of $0.7 million, $1.3 million, $0.9 million and $0.1 million in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively.

(5)On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The table above has been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.

(2)In view of the fact that a net loss of $0.7 million was made in the fourth quarter, 2006, the basic and fully diluted loss per common share are the same for that quarter.

Item 7Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

 

GENERAL

 

We were spun off almost ten years ago from our then parent company, Chemtura Corporation, previously known as Great Lakes Chemical Corporation. Our primary business was the manufacture and sale of petroleum fuel additives, in particular, the lead octane additive for gasoline, tetra ethyl lead (“TEL”). Worldwide use of TEL has declined dramatically resulting in a general rate of decline in volume terms in the last few years of between 10% and 25% a year. As a result, we have shifted our business focus from Octane Additives to the development, manufacture and marketing of Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals.

We divide our business into three distinct segments for both management and reporting purposes: Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals (previously Performance Chemicals as explained below) and Octane Additives. The Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses both operate in markets where we actively seek growth opportunities. The Octane Additives business, although still profitable, is characterized by substantial declining demand.

On October 1, 2007 the Company announced a further streamlining of its fast-growing Performance Chemicals division into a unified, sales-led global business focused on rapidly meeting customers’ needs anywhere in three geographical regions and five core industry sectors. This led to the segment being re-branded under the banner “Active Chemicals.” The five core industry sectors are Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & Paper markets.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the combined operating income of the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals segments of our business rose 35%, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2006. By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2007, operating income for the Octane Additives segment was $19.9 million, which represents a decline of 42% compared with the year ended December 31, 2006. The Octane Additives segment of our business will continue to decline as the last remaining countries that continue to allow TEL for use in automotive gasoline shift over to unleaded. We expect that we will cease all sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline at some time in the next several years, and that we will continue to impair the Octane Additives business goodwill until or prior to that point. However, we have succeeded in implementing our strategic plan of creating sufficient growth in the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals segments of our business to more than offset the decline in the Octane Additives business.

 

The Fuel Specialties business develops, manufactures, blends and markets a range of specialty chemical products used as additives to a wide range of fuels. The business grew initially through a program of acquisitions and more recently, organically, through the development of new products, and increases in sales and profitability.

The Active Chemicals business provides effective technology-based solutions for our customers’ processes or products focused in the Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; and Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & PaperIngredients markets. This business has also grown through acquisitions whichand we intend to continue in the future, while we also seekare seeking to develop new products and continue organic growth.

 

The Octane Additives business is the world’s only producer of TEL for use in automotive gasoline. We are continuing to manage the decrease in the sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline to maximize the cash flow through the decline. Continuous cost improvement measures have been, and will continue to be, taken to respond to declining market demand.

On June 23, 2008 the Company announced a further streamlining of its business into a unified, sales-led global business focused on rapidly meeting customers’ needs anywhere in the world. The Company is moving to an integrated regional model running its growth businesses as one streamlined business operating across three geographical regions – Americas, EMEA (i.e. Europe, Middle East and Africa), and ASPAC (i.e. Asia-Pacific).

For the year ended December 31, 2008, the combined operating income of the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals segments of our business rose 46%, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2006, and now represent 98% of the operating income generated by our businesses. By comparison operating income for the Octane Additives segment declined 97% from $34.5 million to $1.2 million over the same period although $14.2 million of this decline can be attributed to the legal and other professional expenses incurred relating to Oil for Food Program and related investigations. The Octane Additives segment of our business will continue to decline as the last remaining countries that continue to allow TEL for use in automotive gasoline move away from leaded gasoline. We expect that we will cease all sales of TEL for use in automotive gasoline in 2012, and that we will continue to impair the Octane Additives business goodwill until or prior to that point. However, we have succeeded in

implementing our strategic plan of creating sufficient growth in the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals segments of our business to more than offset the decline in the Octane Additives business.

 

We use a variety of raw materials and chemicals in our manufacturing and blending processes and believe the sources of these are adequate for our current operations. Raw materials account for a substantial portion of our variable manufacturing costs. These materials are, with the exception of ethylene in Germany, readily available from more than one source. We use long-term contracts (generally with fixed prices and escalation terms) to help ensure availability, continuity of supply and manage the risk of price increases for some raw materials with commodity swaps. Nevertheless, raw materials are subject to price fluctuations and we may be exposed to risk as prices of these raw materials increase as a result of factors that are not within our control.

 

We are subject to extensive regulation by local, state, federal and foreign governmental authorities both with respect to the methods by which we manufacture and market products and how we conduct our business. In that regard, we are exposed to risks that we may incur liabilities and costs in order to conform to required regulations or in the event that we fail to comply with any laws or regulations. We are currently the subject of two investigations by the U.S. and U.K. government authorities relating to certain aspects of our international operations.

On February 7, 2006, the SEC notified us that it had commenced an investigation to determine whether any violations of law had occurred in connection with our transactions under the United Nations Oil for Food Program between June 1, 1999 and December 31, 2003. In 2005 we made voluntary disclosure of possible violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control regarding transactions and activities engaged in Cuba by certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Management believes that at this time it is still not able to predict with any certainty how the U.S. government will calculate the number of possible violations of these laws and regulations that may have occurred or the nature or amount of penalties to which we could be subject.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

Our objective is to clearly present our financial information in a manner that enhances the understanding of our sources of earnings and cash flows together with our financial position. We aim to achieve this by disclosing information required by the SEC together with further information that provides insight into our businesses.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses Innospec’s consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis management evaluates its estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Financial Statements.

 

Our consolidated financial statements and supplementary data disclose our accounting principles and the methods and estimates used in the preparation of those consolidated

financial statements. We believe those statements and disclosures represent fairly the operating results and financial position of the Company. The purpose of this portion of our report is to further emphasize some of the more critical areas where a significant change in facts and circumstances in our operating and financial environment could cause a change in results of operations or financial position. The policies and estimates that the Company considers the most critical in terms of subjectivity and judgment of assessment are provided below.

 

Contingencies

We are subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and claims. The Company discloses information concerning contingent liabilities in respect of these claims and proceedings for which an unfavorable outcome is more than remote. We recognize liabilities for these claims and proceedings as appropriate based upon the probability and estimability of losses and to fairly present, in conjunction with the disclosures of these matters in our consolidated financial statements, management’s view of our exposure. We review outstanding claims and proceedings with external counsel as appropriate to assess probability and estimates of loss. The Company will recognize a liability related to claims and proceedings at such time as an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When the reasonable estimate is a range the recognized liability will be the best estimate within the range. If no amount in the range is a better estimate than any other amount the minimum amount of the range will be recognized. The Company recognizes its legal and other related professional expenses within selling, general and administrative expenses as and when the associated course of action is committed to.

We re-evaluate these assessments each quarter or as new and significant information becomes available to determine whether a liability should be recognized or if any existing liability should be adjusted. The actual cost of ultimately resolving a claim or proceeding may be substantially different from the amount of the recognized liability. In addition, because it is not permissible under U.S. GAAP to recognize a liability until the loss is both probable and estimable, in some cases there may be insufficient time to recognize a liability prior to the actual incurrence of the loss (upon verdict and judgment at trial, for example, or in the case of a quickly negotiated settlement).

As discussed in Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements the Company is subject to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), U.S. Department of Justice and United Kingdom Serious Fraud Office investigations into its involvement in the United Nations Oil for Food Program (“OFFP”) and other matters beyond just OFFP, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In addition, in 2005 we made voluntary disclosure of possible violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control regarding transactions and activities engaged in Cuba by certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Management believes that at this time it is still not able to predict with any certainty how the U.S. or U.K. governments will calculate the number of possible violations of these laws and regulations that may have occurred or the nature or amount of penalties to which we could be subject. Because of the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome

of these investigations and the costs to the Company of responding and participating in them, no assurance can be given that the ultimate costs and sanctions that may be imposed upon us will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities.

Environmental Liabilities

 

Remediation provisions at December 31, 20072008 amounted to $23.8$22.8 million and relate principally to our United Kingdom site. The Company records environmental liabilities when they are probable and costs can be estimated reasonably. The Company has to anticipate the program of work required and the associated future costs, and has to comply with environmental legislation in the relevant countries. The Company views the costs of vacating our main United Kingdom site as a contingent liability because there is no present intention to exit the site. The Company has further determined that, due to the uncertain product life of TEL, particularly in the market for aviation gas,gasoline, there exists such uncertainty as to the timing of such cash flows that it is not possible to estimate these flows sufficiently reliably to recognize a provision.

 

Goodwill

 

The Company adopted FAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002. This requires that goodwill deemed to have an indefinite life should no longer be amortized, but subject to an annual impairment review, or between years if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that an impairment may have occurred.

The Company elected to perform its annual tests in respect of Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals goodwill as of December 31 each year. In reviewing for any impairment charge the fair value of the reporting units underlying the segments is estimated using an after tax cash flow methodology based on management’s best available estimates at that time.

During 2002 The key assumptions underpinning these calculations include future revenue growth, gross margins and 2003, the goodwill impairment test for the Octane Additives business was performed annually at December 31. Both these reviews showed that the fair value of the reporting unit based on after tax cash flows at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital exceeded the carrying valuecapital. At December 31, 2008 we had $139.2 million of Octane Additives assetsgoodwill relating to our Fuel Specialties and accordingly,Active Chemicals businesses. At this date we performed annual impairment reviews and concluded that there has been no indicatorimpairment of impairment existed and step 2goodwill in respect of the FAS 142 impairment test was not performed.those reporting segments.

 

In light of the continuing decline in the Octane Additives market globally, as the Company makes sales of Octane Additives in each quarter, the remaining sales and corresponding cash flows that can be derived from the Octane Additives business are reduced, and accordingly the fair value of the Octane Additives reporting unit is reduced. Based on the Company’s detailed forecast model, assumptions at December 31, 2003 indicated that the reduction in forecast future cash flows during 2004 would reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below the carrying value of Octane Additives assets and, accordingly, there was likely to be a significant goodwill impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2004. As a result the Company determined that quarterly impairment reviews be performed from January 1, 2004 and any impairment charge arising be recognized in the relevant quarter.

The value of the remaining cash flows from the Octane Additives business is calculated at any review date by reference to the best available estimates for future revenues, gross margins, selling and administrative costs as well as the fixed and working capital requirements of the business. The resulting cash flows are then discounted and the total discounted cash flows of the Octane Additives business are then allocated to the fair value of the Octane Additives business unit at that date. The Company uses this information to derive an implied goodwill value which is then compared to the carrying value to determine what impairment is needed.

Using this methodology and the assumptions underlying the detailed forecast model the Company believes that it is possible to predict the pattern of likely future impairment charges of Octane Additives business goodwill. This method reflects the relatively unique nature of the Octane Additives business.

As a result of the Octane Additives impairment reviews performed during 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 impairment charges of $3.7 million, $12.1 million $36.7 million and $134.4$36.7 million, respectively, were recognized. These charges are non-cash in nature and have no impact on taxation. There is $12.7$9.0 million of goodwill remaining at December 31, 2008 which relates to the Octane Additives business. Given the quantum and predictability of the remaining future cash flows from the Octane Additives

business the Company expects goodwill impairment charges to be recognized in the income statement on an approximate straight-line basis over the three years endingto December 31, 2010.

2012. Effective October 1, 2008 the Company extended its estimate for the future life of the Octane Additives business from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2012.

We believe that the assumptions used in our annual and quarterly impairment reviews are reasonable, but that they are judgmental, and that variations in any of the assumptions may result in materially different calculations of impairment charges, if any. At December 31, 2007 we had $139.1 million2008, the sum of the fair values of our reporting units was in excess of the Company’s market capitalization (based upon our stock price at the same date) due primarily to an estimated control premium. The control premium reflects the fact that management has access to information, such as future projections, and the power to make investment, financing and resource allocation decisions. Management do not believe that any further goodwill relatingimpairment charges are required to our Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses. At this date we performed annual impairment reviews and concluded that there has been no impairment of goodwillbe recognized in addition to those already recognized in respect of thosethe Octane Additives reporting segments.unit.

 

Intangible Assets, Net of Amortization

 

At December 31, 20072008 we had $41.9$28.3 million of intangibles that are discussed in Note 109 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These intangible assets relate to all of our business segments and are being amortized straight-line over periods of up to 13 years. We continually assess the markets and products related to these intangibles, as well as their specific carrying values, and have concluded that these carrying values and amortization periods remain appropriate. We also evaluate these intangibles for any potential impairment when events occur or circumstances change which suggest that an impairment may have occurred. If events occur or circumstances change it may possibly cause a reduction in periods over which these intangibles are amortized or result in a non-cash impairment of a portion of the intangibles’ carrying value. A reduction in amortization periods would have no effect on cash flows.

 

Pensions

 

The Company’s principal pension arrangement is a contributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”(“the Plan”) covering a number of its current and former employees in the United Kingdom though it does also have other much smaller pension arrangements in the United Kingdom and overseas.

The Company accounts foris contributing amounts to the Plan to cover service costs to date. Employee and employer contributions from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2007 were at 5% and 22.6%, respectively, of pensionable pay. From January 1, 2007, employee and employer contributions were at 7% and 29%, respectively. In addition, since March 2007, the Company has been contributing £1.5 million per calendar year in accordance with FAS 87,Employers’ Accountinga 10 year deficit recovery plan. From January 1, 2008, employee and employer contributions remained at 7% and 29% though employee contributions were paid by the employer through a salary sacrifice arrangement. The estimated level of Company contributions into the Plan for Pensions, FAS 88,Employers’ Accounting for Settlements2009 is $5.8 million.

A full tri-annual actuarial valuation of the Plan was performed as at December 31, 2005 and Curtailmentsan update performed as at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the results of Defined Benefit Pension Plansand FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.which are reflected in these consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 20072008 the underlying plan asset value and projected benefit obligationPBO were $889.1$557.4 million and $854.3$571.2 million, respectively, resulting in a surplusdeficit of $34.8$13.8 million. Further disclosure is provided in Note 6A full tri-annual actuarial valuation of the Notes toPlan as at December 31, 2008 will be performed in 2009. The results of this valuation will be reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2009.

 

Movements in the underlying plan asset value and projected benefit obligationPBO are dependent on actual return on investments and pay awards as well as our assumptions in respect of the discount rate, annual member mortality rates, future return on assets, future pay escalation, future pension increases and future inflation. We develop these assumptions after considering advice from a major global actuarial consulting firm. A change in any one of these assumptions could impact the plan asset value, projected benefit obligationPBO and pension cost recognized in the income statement. Such changes could impact our operating results and financial position. A 0.25% change in either the discount rate assumption, or level of price inflation assumption, would change the projected benefit obligationPBO by approximately $30$19 million and the net pension charge for 2008 by approximately $0.2$1.4 million.

 

A full actuarial valuation ofThe Company accounts for the Plan was performed as at December 31, 2005 and an update performed as at December 31, 2007 and 2006, the results of both of which are reflected in these consolidated financial statements. The Company is contributing amounts to the Plan to cover service costs to date. Employee and employer contributions from January 1, 2007 were

at 7% and 29%, respectively, of pensionable pay. In addition, since March 2007, the Company has been contributing $3 million per calendar year in accordance with a 10 year deficit recovery plan. The estimated levelFAS 87,Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, FAS 88,Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Company contributions intoDefined Benefit Pension Plans and FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. Further disclosure is provided in Note 6 of the Plan for 2008 is $8.9 million.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance and Uncertain Income Tax Positions

 

At December 31, 2007,2008, we had a valuation allowance aggregating $8.8$7.3 million against all of our foreign tax credit carry forwards and certain of our foreign deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an assessment of both negative and positive evidence when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. In accordance with FAS 109, evidence, such as operating results during the most recent periods, is given more weight than our expectations of future profitability, which are inherently uncertain. Our expectation is that we are unlikely to use the foreign tax credits and uncertainty about profitability in certain foreign locations for future periods represented sufficient negative evidence to require a valuation allowance under FAS 109. We intend to maintain a valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the realization of such assets.

 

The calculation of our tax liabilities involves evaluating uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be required. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary.

We also recognize tax benefits to the extent that it is more likely than not that our positions will be sustained when challenged by the taxing authorities in accordance with the recognition criteria of FASB Interpretation No 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given period may be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement may require cash payments and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the year of resolution. A favorable tax settlement may be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the year of resolution. We report interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions as income taxes. For additional information regarding uncertain income tax positions see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Results of Operations – Fiscal 20072008 compared to Fiscal 2006:2007:

 

The following table providing operating income by reporting business also provides the comparative results of operations in 20062007 and 2005.2006.

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

 2007

 2006

 

Net sales:

   

Net sales

   

Fuel Specialties

  $374.6  $311.3  $257.1   $440.9  $374.6  $311.3 

Active Chemicals

   133.8   120.4   109.4    138.3   133.8   120.4 

Octane Additives

   94.0   100.4   198.3    61.3   94.0   100.4 
  


 


 


  


 


 


  $602.4  $532.1  $564.8   $640.5  $602.4  $532.1 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Gross profit:

   

Gross profit

   

Fuel Specialties

  $124.7  $106.2  $83.5   $145.6  $124.7  $106.2 

Active Chemicals

   24.6   22.7   17.6    12.5   24.6   22.7 

Octane Additives

   48.1   57.8   99.0    28.3   48.1   57.8 
  


 


 


  


 


 


  $197.4  $186.7  $200.1   $186.4  $197.4  $186.7 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Operating income:

   

Operating Income

   

Fuel Specialties

  $63.6  $45.7  $26.2   $80.0  $63.6  $45.7 

Active Chemicals

   6.1   5.8   1.0    (5.0)  6.1   5.8 

Octane Additives

   19.9   34.5   69.2    1.2   19.9   34.5 

FAS 158/87 pension charge

   (4.6)  —     (1.7)

FAS 158/87 pension (charge)

   (2.3)  (4.6)  —   

Corporate costs

   (22.0)  (22.1)  (26.7)   (24.9)  (22.0)  (22.1)

Restructuring charge

   (3.0)  (4.5)  (31.3)   (2.1)  (3.0)  (4.5)

Impairment of Octane Additive business goodwill

   (12.1)  (36.7)  (134.4)

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   (3.7)  (12.1)  (36.7)

Profit on disposals (net)

   —     9.2   —      0.4   —     9.2 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Total operating income/(loss)

  $47.9  $31.9  $(97.7)

Total operating income

  $43.6  $47.9  $31.9 
  


 


 


  


 


 


(in millions except ratios)


  2007

 2006

 Change

   2008

 2007

 Change

 

Net sales:

   

Net sales

   

Fuel Specialties

  $374.6  $311.3  $63.3  +20%  $440.9  $374.6  $66.3  +18%

Active Chemicals

   133.8   120.4   13.4  +11%   138.3   133.8   4.5  +3%

Octane Additives

   94.0   100.4   (6.4) -6%   61.3   94.0   (32.7) -35%
  


 


 


   


 


 


 
  $602.4  $532.1  $70.3  +13%  $640.5  $602.4  $38.1  +6%
  


 


 


   


 


 


 

Gross profit:

   

Gross profit

   

Fuel Specialties

  $124.7  $106.2  $18.5  +17%  $145.6  $124.7  $20.9  +17%

Active Chemicals

   24.6   22.7   1.9  +8%   12.5   24.6   (12.1) -49%

Octane Additives

   48.1   57.8   (9.7) -17%   28.3   48.1   (19.8) -41%
  


 


 


   


 


 


 
  $197.4  $186.7  $10.7  +6%  $186.4  $197.4  $(11.0) -6%
  


 


 


   


 


 


 

Gross margin (%)

      

Fuel Specialties

   33.3   34.1   -0.8     33.0   33.3   -0.3  

Active Chemicals

   18.4   18.9   -0.5     9.0   18.4   -9.4  

Octane Additives

   51.2   57.6   -6.4     46.2   51.2   -5.0  

Aggregate

   32.8   35.1   -2.3     29.1   32.8   -3.7  

Operating expenses:

   

Operating expenses

   

Fuel Specialties

  $(59.0) $(59.3) $0.3  -1%  $(63.3) $(59.0) $(4.3) +7%

Active Chemicals

   (17.1)  (15.5)  (1.6) +10%   (16.1)  (17.1)  1.0  -6%

Octane Additives

   (14.8)  (13.2)  (1.6) +12%   (23.4)  (14.8)  (8.6) +58%

FAS 158/87 pension charge

   (4.6)  —     (4.6) +100%

FAS 158/87 pension (charge)

   (2.3)  (4.6)  2.3  -50%

Corporate costs

   (22.0)  (22.1)  0.1  -0%   (24.9)  (22.0)  (2.9) +13%
  


 


 


   


 


 


 
  $(117.5) $(110.1) $(7.4) +7%  $(130.0) $(117.5) $(12.5) +11%
  


 


 


   


 


 


 

Fuel Specialties

Net sales:the year on year increase of 18% was spread across the markets in which we operate as follows – the Americas (up 18%), EMEA (up 18%), ASPAC (up 23%) and Avtel (up 9%). This growth was due to volume (up 10 percentage points), price and product mix (up 7 percentage points) and the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 1 percentage point).

Americas delivered strong sales of static dissipaters, lubricity improvers and cetane number improvers. Growth was focused in volume (up 10 percentage points) and a richer price and product mix (up 8 percentage points).

Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) net sales increased by 18% driven by strong sales of performance, refinery and light heating oil additives. Growth was focused in volume (up 9 percentage points), price and product mix (up 6 percentage points) and the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 3 percentage points).

The Asia Pacific region (“ASPAC”) benefited from strong sales of refinery additives and diesel detergents. Growth was focused in volume (up 22 percentage points) and price and product mix (up 1 percentage point).

The TEL for use in aviation gasoline (“Avtel”) business growth was primarily due to a richer sales mix (up 11 percentage points) offset by lower volume (down 2 percentage points). The results in the corresponding period last year were positively impacted by the more favorable pricing allowed, and the volumes sold, under the Ethyl settlement.

Gross margin:the year on year decline of 0.3 percentage points reflects both the lower proportion of higher margin Avtel sales together with the adverse impact of lower TEL production volumes on the fixed cost base of the manufacturing site at Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom. Gross margins in the remainder of the markets remained largely constant as we successfully passed raw material price increases onto our customers.

Operating expenses:excluding the impact of $1.9 million of one-time professional fees in 2007 the year on year increase in operating expenses was $6.2 million or 11%. The underlying 11% increase was less than the 18% sales growth as we continued to leverage the infrastructure of this business. This was achieved despite the adverse impact of, until the latter months of 2008, the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar on our European Union euro denominated cost base and higher personnel-related costs. In addition, research and development expenses have been driven higher to support this expanding business increasing by $1.6 million or 15% between the corresponding periods.

Active Chemicals

Net sales: the year on year increase of 3% was spread across the markets in which we operate as follows – the Americas (up 5%), EMEA (down 1%) and ASPAC (up 28%). This growth was due to volume (up 2 percentage points) and the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 2 percentage points) offset by price and product mix (down 1 percentage point).

Americas delivered strong sales of fragrance and personal care products. Growth was focused in volume (up 11 percentage points) offset by a poorer price and product mix (down 4 percentage points) and the unfavorable impact of exchange rates (down 2 percentage points).

EMEA sales declined marginally despite the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 5 percentage points) and a richer price and product mix (up 2 percentage points) offset by lower volume (down 8 percentage points). Strong personal care and polymer product sales were offset by lower household, industrial and institutional product sales.

Our ASPAC business currently represents less than 10% of our overall Active Chemicals business reflecting the early stage of its development. Notwithstanding this, sales benefited from higher volumes (up 25 percentage points) in fragrance, personal care and polymers products. This increase was assisted by the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 1 percentage point) and a richer price and product mix (up 2 percentage points).

Gross margin: the year on year decline of 9.4 percentage points reflects price and product mix, primarily in respect of the greater proportion in 2008 of lower margin polymer sales, the

significant increase in raw material and energy costs suffered across all the markets in which we operate, and the adverse impact from lower utilization and manufacturing efficiencies in our U.S. and United Kingdom plants.

Operating expenses: the year on year decrease in operating expenses was $1.0 million or 6%. This decrease was achieved despite the 3% sales growth primarily due to lower personnel-related costs.

Octane Additives

Net sales:net sales and volumes both declined 35% in line with the historic decline in this business. The decline reflected a marginally poorer sales mix despite moderate price increases in 2008. In both 2008 and 2007 sales were focused in the Middle East and Africa.

Gross margin:the year on year decrease in gross margin was 5.0 percentage points. Following the settlement regarding the TMAs effective April 1, 2007 the profit share with Ethyl from this business which was charged within cost of goods sold has ceased. The cessation of the TMAs and moderate price increases achieved in 2008 have favorably impacted gross margin and limited the adverse impact of the marginally poorer sales mix and lower TEL production volumes on the fixed cost base of the manufacturing site at Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom.

Operating expenses: excluding the impact of legal and other professional expenses of $15.5 million and $4.6 million 2008 and 2007, respectively, relating to the Oil for Food Program and related investigations, the year on year decrease in operating expenses was $2.3 million or 23% primarily in respect of reduced selling costs.

Other Income Statement Captions

FAS 158/87 pension (charge): this non-cash charge reduced by $2.3 million because, unlike 2007, there was no amortization of net actuarial losses required.

Corporate costs: year on year corporate costs increased $2.9 million due to the expensing of $3.9 million of advisory and financing costs related to two large potential acquisitions that the Company is now not pursuing. This was offset to some extent, in the latter months of 2008, by the favorable impact of the relative strength of the U.S. dollar on our predominantly British pound sterling cost base.

Restructuring charge:restructuring costs are comprised of the following:

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

Reduction in EMEA headcount

  $0.7  $0.4

United Kingdom site clearance

   0.6   1.2

Relocation of our European Headquarters to the Ellesmere Port site

   0.3   0.8

U.S. site clearance

   0.3   —  

Reduction in Americas headcount

   0.2   —  

Additional payments in respect of the former CEO

   —     0.1

Sundry other restructuring

   —     0.5
   

  

   $2.1  $3.0
   

  

Amortization of intangible assets:the amortization charge has declined by a net $9.5 million from $16.9 million to $7.4 million. Of this reduction, $10.0 million is due to the absence of the Veritel intangible asset amortization charge in 2008 since it was fully amortized as at December 31, 2007. This reduction has been offset by a $0.5 million increase in amortization costs related to the Ethyl intangible asset effective April 1, 2007.

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill:the 2008 charge was lower than that recognized in 2007 primarily due to the higher operating income and associated cash flows in 2007. Effective October 1, 2008 we have updated the estimates used in the detailed forecast model to calculate impairment charges to reflect the Company’s extended estimate for the future life of our Octane Additives business from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2012.

Profit on disposal:in May 2008 the Company recognized $0.4 million profit following the disposal of surplus U.S. real estate.

Interest expense (net):the net interest charge decreased by $1.6 million in 2008 to $5.4 million. This was despite the fact that average net debt increased by approximately $4 million between the corresponding periods from $67 million to $71 million. This decrease primarily reflects the fact that U.S. base interest rates declined between the corresponding periods and a $0.6 million reduction in the deferred finance costs amortization charge.

Other net (expense)/income: in 2008 other net expense of $19.3 million related to net foreign exchange losses of $19.0 million and net sundry other expenses of $0.3 million. The net foreign exchange losses related to losses on foreign currency forward exchange contracts and losses on translation of net assets in our European business of $12.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively. In 2007 other net income comprised $7.5 million in respect of net foreign exchange gains offset by $0.6 million of other sundry expenses. The net foreign exchange gains related to losses on foreign currency forward exchange contracts and gains on translation of net assets in our European business of $0.7 million and $8.2 million, respectively.

Income taxes:tax relief is not available on the charge for impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill and accordingly we believe that the change in the effective rate of tax to 33.5% in 2008 from 38.2% in 2007 is best explained by adjusting for this non-deductible charge. This adjusted effective tax rate has decreased 2.4 percentage points between the corresponding periods primarily due to the positive impact of taxable profits in different geographical locations partially offset by foreign income inclusions.

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

 

Income before income taxes

  $18.8  $47.7 

Add back Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   3.7   12.1 
   


 


   $22.5  $59.8 
   


 


Income taxes

  $6.3  $18.2 
   


 


Adjusted effective tax rate

   28.0%  30.4%
   


 


Results of Operations – Fiscal 2007 compared to Fiscal 2006:

(in millions except ratios)


  2007

  2006

  Change

    

Net sales

                

Fuel Specialties

  $374.6  $311.3  $63.3  +20%

Active Chemicals

   133.8   120.4   13.4  +11%

Octane Additives

   94.0   100.4   (6.4) -6%
   


 


 


   
   $602.4  $532.1  $70.3  +13%
   


 


 


   

Gross profit

                

Fuel Specialties

  $124.7  $106.2  $18.5  +17%

Active Chemicals

   24.6   22.7   1.9  +8%

Octane Additives

   48.1   57.8   (9.7) -17%
   


 


 


   
   $197.4  $186.7  $10.7  +6%
   


 


 


   

Gross margin (%)

                

Fuel Specialties

   33.3   34.1   -0.8    

Active Chemicals

   18.4   18.9   -0.5    

Octane Additives

   51.2   57.6   -6.4    

Aggregate

   32.8   35.1   -2.3    

Operating expenses

                

Fuel Specialties

  $(59.0) $(59.3) $0.3  -1%

Active Chemicals

   (17.1)  (15.5)  (1.6) +10%

Octane Additives

   (14.8)  (13.2)  (1.6) +12%

FAS 158/87 pension (charge)

   (4.6)  —     (4.6) +100%

Corporate costs

   (22.0)  (22.1)  0.1  -0%
   


 


 


   
   $(117.5) $(110.1) $(7.4) +7%
   


 


 


   

 

Fuel Specialties

 

Net sales:the year on year increase of 20% was spread across the markets in which we operate as follows – the Americas (up 25%), EMEA (up 12%), ASPAC (up 19%) and Avtel (up 44%). This growth was due to volume (up 14 percentage points) and the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 6 percentage points).

 

Americas benefited from strong sales of lubricity products, cetane number improvers and corrosion inhibitors. Growth was focused in volume (up 15 percentage points) and price and product mix (up 10 percentage points).

 

Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) benefited from strong sales of performance and refinery products. Growth was focused in volume (up 6 percentage points) and the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 13 percentage points) offset by price and product mix (down 7 percentage points). Net sales increased 21% excluding the impact of a one-off contract in 2006 that did not recur in 2007.

Asia Pacific (“ASPAC”) benefited from strong sales of marine products. Growth was focused in volume (up 36 percentage points) and the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 1 percentage point) offset by price and product mix (down 18 percentage points).

The TEL for use in aviation gasoline (“Avtel”) business growth was due to volume (up 21 percentage points) and price (up 23 percentage points). The results were positively impacted by the more favorable pricing allowed, and the volumes to be sold, under the Ethyl settlement.

 

Gross margin: the year on year decline of 0.8 percentage points reflectsreflected both the lower proportion of higher margin Avtel sales together with the adverse impact of lower TEL production volumes on the fixed cost base of the manufacturing site at Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom. Gross margins in the remainder of the markets remained largely constant as we successfully passed raw material price increases onto our customers.

 

Operating expenses:excluding the impact of $7.1 million of one-time professional fees and a customer claim incurred in 2006 the year on year increase in operating expenses was $6.8 million or 13%. The underlying 13% increase was less than the 20% sales growth as we continued to leverage the infrastructure of this business.

 

Active Chemicals

 

Net sales:the year on year increase of 11% was spread across the markets in which we operate as follows – the Americas (up 12%), EMEA (up 12%) and ASPAC (up 4%). This growth was due to volume (up 4 percentage points), the favorable impact of exchange rates (up 6 percentage points) and price and product mix (up 1 percentage points).

 

Americas benefited from strong sales of personal care and fragrance products accounting for $2.4 million and $3.7 million of the growth, respectively. This was offset by a $1.0 million reduction in our custom manufacturing revenues primarily due to the slow down in the U.S. construction industry.

 

EMEA primarily benefited from strong polymer sales which increased $7.3 million year on year. There were also stronger sales in respect of our fragrances business.

 

Our ASPAC business currently representsrepresented less than 10% of our overall Active Chemicals business reflecting the embryonic stage of its development. Notwithstanding this, sales were driven higher by the strong performance in polymer and fragrance products consistent with our other geographical regions.

 

Gross margin: the year on year decline of 0.5 percentage points reflectsreflected our strategy in the latter half of 2007 to reduce inventories and release cash by lowering our production volumes. This had the short term impact of adversely impacting unit manufacturing costs and margins.

 

Operating expenses:the year on year increase of 10% iswas due to the adverse impact of exchange rates (up 6 percentage points) and inflation (up 4 percentage points). The 10% increase was less than the 11% sales growth as we continued to leverage the infrastructure of this business.

Octane Additives

 

Net sales:2006 benefited from the release of a retrospective pricing provision which contributed $6.6 million to net sales and $4.5 million to operating income. Excluding the impact of this release net sales were constant despite volumes declining 5%. This reflected a richer sales mix and moderate price increases in 2007. In both 2007 and 2006 sales were focused in the Middle East and Africa.

 

Gross margin: the year on year decline iswas 6.4 percentage points. Excluding the impact of the release of a retrospective pricing provision in 2006 the year on year decline iswas 5.6 percentage points. Following the settlement regarding the TMAs effective April 1, 2007 the profit share with Ethyl from this business which was charged within cost of goods sold hashad ceased. The cessation of the TMAs, together with the richer sales mix and moderate price increases achieved in 2007, has favorably impacted gross margin and limited the adverse impact of lower TEL production volumes on the fixed cost base of the manufacturing site at Ellesmere Port, United Kingdom.

 

Operating expenses:excluding the impact of $4.6 million of legal expenses and accruals, related to the SEC’s investigation of the United Nations Oil for Food Program incurred in 2007 or to be incurred in 2008, the year on year decrease in operating expenses was $3.0 million or 23%. The majority of the savings were made in respect of the wind down of the French and South African sales offices and a headcount reduction within sales.

 

Other Income Statement Captions

 

FAS 158/87 pension charge:(charge):we were required to recognize a non-cash charge of $4.6 million in 2007 primarily in respect of the amortization of net actuarial losses. No similar charge was required to be recognized in 2006.

 

Corporate costs:year on year corporate costs declined $0.1 million despite the adverse impact of the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar on a predominantly British pound sterling cost base due to savings generated in 2007. The savings resulted from lower professional fees since 2006 included costs incurred following the Company’s switch to the Nasdaq Stock Market on March 21, 2006 and name change on January 30, 2006.

 

Restructuring charge:restructuring costs arewere comprised of the following:

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

United Kingdom site clearance

  $1.2  $1.4

Relocation of our European Headquarters to the Ellesmere Port site

   0.8   0.3

Reduction in Active Chemicals United Kingdom headcount

   0.4   —  

Additional payments in respect of the former CEO

   0.1   0.6

Cost reduction program on the United Kingdom Octane Additives site

   —     1.6

Relocation and closure costs of a U.S. Active Chemicals site

   —     0.4

Sundry other restructuring

   0.5   0.2
   

  

   $3.0  $4.5
   

  

Amortization of intangible assets:the increased amortization expense of $4.2 million in 2007 relatesrelated to the intangible asset recognized in respect of the payment to Ethyl, which represented Ethyl foregoing their entitlement to a share of the future income stream under the TMAs effective April 1, 2007. The amount attributed to the Octane Additives business segment iswas being amortized straight-line to December 31, 2010 and the amount attributed to the Fuel Specialties business segment iswas being amortized straight-line to December 31, 2017.

 

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill:the 2006 charge was higher than that recognized in 2007 primarily due to the higher operating income and associated cash flows in 2006. Since the end of 2006, we have updated the estimates used in the detailed forecast model to calculate the impairment charges to include effective April 1, 2007 the fact that we willwould no longer be sharing with Ethyl the profits from the sale of TEL outside North America.

 

Interest expense (net): the net interest charge increased moderately by $0.2 million in 2007 to $7.0 million. This was primarily due to 2006 including the receipt of $0.6 million interest previously charged on a tax balance, offset by the fact that average net debt fell by approximately $10 million between the corresponding periods from $77 million to $67 million.

 

Other net income/(expense):/income: in 2007 other net income comprised $7.5 million in respect of net foreign exchange gains offset by $0.6 million of other sundry expenses. In 2006 other net income comprised $7.6 million in respect of net foreign exchange gains offset by $0.8 million of other sundry expenses.

 

Income taxes:tax relief is not available on the charge for impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill and accordingly we believebelieved that the change in the effective rate of tax to 38.2% in 2007 from 64.2% in 2006 iswas best explained by adjusting for this non-deductible charge. This adjusted effective tax rate has increased 0.6 percentage points between the corresponding periods primarily due to the origin of profits and the continued increased profitability of our U.S. based Fuel Specialties business which incursincurred the standard federal tax rate of 35%, together with state taxes, offset by the favorable conclusion of some historic tax matters.

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

 

Income before income taxes

  $47.7  $31.8 

Add back Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   12.1   36.7 
   


 


   $59.8  $68.5 
   


 


Income taxes

  $18.2  $20.4 
   


 


Adjusted effective tax rate

   30.4%  29.8%
   


 


Results of Operations – Fiscal 2006 compared to Fiscal 2005:

 

(in millions except ratios)


  2006

  2005

  Change

    

Net sales:

                

Fuel Specialties

  $311.3  $257.1  $54.2  +21%

Active Chemicals

   120.4   109.4   11.0  +10%

Octane Additives

   100.4   198.3   (97.9) -49%
   


 


 


   
   $532.1  $564.8  $(32.7) -6%
   


 


 


   

Gross profit:

                

Fuel Specialties

  $106.2  $83.5  $22.7  +27%

Active Chemicals

   22.7   17.6   5.1  +29%

Octane Additives

   57.8   99.0   (41.2) -42%
   


 


 


   
   $186.7  $200.1  $(13.4) -7%
   


 


 


   

Gross margin (%)

                

Fuel Specialties

   34.1   32.5   +1.6    

Active Chemicals

   18.9   16.1   +2.8    

Octane Additives

   57.6   49.9   +7.7    

Aggregate

   35.1   35.4   -0.3    
                 

Operating expenses:

                

Fuel Specialties

  $(59.3) $(56.1) $(3.2) +6%

Active Chemicals

   (15.5)  (15.2)  (0.3) +2%

Octane Additives

   (13.2)  (19.7)  6.5  -33%

FAS 158/87 pension charge

   —     (1.7)  1.7  -100%

Corporate costs

   (22.1)  (26.7)  4.6  -17%
   


 


 


   
   $(110.1) $(119.4) $9.3  -8%
   


 


 


   

Fuel Specialties

Net sales: the year on year increase of 21% was spread across the markets in which we operate as follows – the Americas (up 21%), EMEA (up 17%), ASPAC (up 60%) and Avtel (up 6%).

Americas sales were driven by our strong market-leading position in diesel fuel additives and the U.S. government’s adoption early in 2006 of new ultra low sulfur diesel regulations.

Approximately half of the EMEA sales growth was due to a one-off contract with a single customer.

The ASPAC growth was due to the benefit generated from customer contracts entered into early in 2006.

Gross margin:the year on year increase of 1.6 percentage points was focused in the Americas and offset the lower margins seen in EMEA and ASPAC. The Americas gross margin

benefited from sales prices increases implemented early in 2006 and tight control of material costs throughout the year. The EMEA gross margin was diluted by the impact of a one-off contract with a single customer and the ASPAC gross margin was impacted by product mix.

Operating expenses:2006 included the impact of $7.1 million of one-time professional fees and a customer claim incurred. 2005 included the impact of $5.9 million of OFAC related costs. Excluding these items, the underlying 4% increase in operating expenses was significantly less than the 21% sales growth as we leveraged the infrastructure of this business.

Active Chemicals

Net sales:sales growth in 2006 was spread across each of the individual operations which comprise this business. In absolute dollar terms however, the growth was focused in our aroma fragrances business and our surfactants and emollients business. Our aroma fragrances business benefited from price increases throughout 2006 and greater production capacity which came on stream in the latter stages of the year. During 2006 our surfactants and emollients business leveraged its customer base to increase both sales prices and volumes across almost all of its product range.

Gross margin:the business delivered a 29% increase in gross profit which was significantly in excess of the 10% sales growth. This increase was generated from a 2.8 percentage points improvement in gross margins spread across each of the individual operations which comprise this business segment.

Operating expenses:the year on year increase was limited to 2% despite the sales growth of 10%. This sales growth and tight cost control has been achieved by leveraging the infrastructure of this business.

Octane Additives

Net sales:the sales decline was limited to 49% in dollar terms despite volumes decreasing 63% primarily due to the richer sales mix in 2006, compared to 2005, and moderate price increases achieved during 2006. Sales volumes were adversely impacted by South Africa leaving the market for TEL for use in automotive gasoline at the start of the year, and the absence in 2006 of significant shipments to South East Asia. However, sales to the Middle East in 2006 remained resilient.

Gross margin:the 7.7 percentage points improvement in gross margin reflected the richer sales mix and moderate price increases achieved during 2006.

Operating expenses:the 33% reduction in operating expenses compares to the 49% sales decline experienced in this business. The majority of the savings were generated from reduced commission charges caused by the absence of sales to South East Asia.

Other Income Statement Captions

FAS 158/87 pension charge:we were required to recognize a non-cash charge of $1.7 million in 2005 primarily in respect of the amortization of prior service cost. No similar charge was required to be recognized in 2006.

Corporate costs:year on year corporate costs declined $4.6 million due to the restructuring of the corporate functions and reduced costs in relation to Sarbanes Oxley compliance. This was achieved despite the fact 2006 included costs incurred following the Company’s switch to the Nasdaq Stock Market on March 21, 2006 and name change on January 30, 2006. There were also significant costs recognized in 2005 for the special investigation into the transfer of funds in South Africa by the former CEO.

Restructuring charge:restructuring costs are comprised of the following:

(in millions)


  2006

  2005

Cost reduction program on the United Kingdom Octane Additives site

  $1.6  $2.2

United Kingdom site clearance

   1.4   3.4

Additional payments in respect of the former CEO

   0.6   4.0

Relocation and closure costs of a U.S. Active Chemicals site

   0.4   0.4

Relocation of our European Headquarters to the Ellesmere Port site

   0.3   1.2

United Kingdom pension curtailment charge under FAS 88

   —     12.5

Disposal of the Adastra diesel particulate filters business

   —     2.0

Relocation and closure of a United Kingdom Fuel Technology Centre

   —     2.0

Reduction in Corporate United Kingdom headcount

   —     1.6

Severance costs of leavers staying beyond contractual notice periods

   —     1.4

Reduction in Fuel Specialties United Kingdom headcount

   —     0.6

Sundry other restructuring

   0.2   —  
   

  

   $4.5  $31.3
   

  

Amortization of intangible assets: the amortization charge was $12.7 million in 2006 and 2005 reflecting the fact our intangible assets are amortized to the income statement using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. There were no significant intangible asset additions or disposals in 2006 or 2005 that would impact the amortization charge.

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill:the 2005 charge was significantly higher than that recognized in 2006 due to the loss of anticipated sales and associated cash flows from Venezuela, a major customer, in the second quarter of 2005. In 2006 there were no significant changes in the estimates used in the detailed forecast model to calculate the impairment charges.

Profit on disposal (net): the Company recognized $9.6 million profit following the disposal of surplus real estate in the United Kingdom. This was partially offset by prepaid disposal costs of $0.4 million.

Interest expense (net): net interest expense declined by $0.8 million in 2006 to $6.8 million. This was primarily due to 2006 including the receipt of $0.6 million interest previously

charged on a tax balance, and the fact that average net debt fell by approximately $30 million between the corresponding periods from $107 million to $77 million. Moreover, this reduced net interest expense was achieved despite the fact that the U.S. base interest rate rose between the corresponding periods.

Other net income/(expense):in 2006 other net income comprised $7.6 million in respect of foreign exchange gains offset by $0.8 million of other sundry expenses. In 2005 other net expense comprised a $5.5 million charge for the write-off of the Company’s investment in Stylacats in the third quarter, a charge of $1.2 million to fully provide against two other investments, a $3.7 million charge for exchange losses on forward foreign exchange contracts and $2.2 million of other sundry expenses.

Income taxes:tax relief is not available on the charge for impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill and accordingly we believe that the change in the effective rate of tax to 64.2% in 2006 from (3.5)% in 2005 is best explained by adjusting for this non-deductible charge. This adjusted effective tax rate has increased 4.0 percentage points between the corresponding periods primarily due to the origin of profits, exhaustion of U.S. net operating losses and increased profitability of our U.S. based Fuel Specialties business which incurs the standard federal tax rate of 35%, together with state taxes.

(in millions)


  2006

  2005

 

Income/(loss) before income taxes

  $31.8  $(118.1)

Add back Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   36.7   134.4 
   


 


   $68.5  $16.3 
   


 


Income taxes

  $20.4  $4.2 
   


 


Adjusted effective tax rate

   29.8%  25.8%
   


 


LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Working Capital

 

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

 

Total current assets

  $256.6  $256.1 

Total current liabilities

   (188.1)  (160.7)
   


 


Working capital

   68.5   95.4 

Less prepaid income taxes

   (10.1)  —   

Less cash and cash equivalents

   (13.9)  (24.3)

Add back accrued income taxes

   —     6.9 

Add back short-term borrowing

   73.0   20.0 

Add back current portion of plant closure provisions

   4.1   4.4 

Add back current portion of unrecognized tax benefits

   9.2   12.6 

Add back current portion of deferred income

   0.1   0.1 

Add back current portion of deferred income taxes

   —     0.1 
   


 


Adjusted working capital

  $130.9  $115.2 
   


 


At December 31, 2007,2008, we had adjusted working capital of $115.2$130.9 million (defined by the Company as accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities rather than total current assets less total current liabilities). In 20072008 our adjusted working capital increased by $17.3$15.7 million. The $15.8$4.9 million increasedecrease in accounts receivable and prepaid expenses was spread acrossfocused within our threeActive Chemicals business units as a resultmainly reflecting the sales decline in our polymers business towards the end of the increased tradingfourth quarter in our Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals growth businesses and the impact of the timing of Octane Additives shipments compared to the corresponding period last year. Inventories increased by $12.62008. The $5.7 million alsoincrease in all three business units though itinventories was focused in our growth Fuel Specialties and Octane Additives, the latter being due to the unwind of approximately $12.0 million of Ethyl inventory working capital arrangementsbusiness following the settlement regarding the TMAs.decision to build certain product inventories of strategic importance. The $11.1$14.9 million increasedecrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was limited to a moderate increase within Active Chemicals due to increased trading levels,reflects the release of $6.3 million of contract related provisions no longer deemed necessary which have been offset against the related intangible asset and somewhat larger increases within Fuel Specialties and Octane Additives reflecting the significantly increased trading levels and recognition of a $3.7 million legal accrual, respectively.

lower personnel-related accruals.

Cash

 

At December 31, 20072008 and 20062007 we had cash and cash equivalents of $13.9 million and $24.3 million, and $101.9 million, respectively.

Debt

 

At December 31, 20072008 we had a finance facility which provided for borrowings by us of up to $155 million including a term loan of $55 million and revolving credit facility of $100 million. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $73.0 million of debt outstanding under this finance facility and was in compliance with all financial covenants therein. The debt maturity profile as at December 31, 2008, including the principal facility, is set out below:

(in millions)


   

2009

  $73.0

2010

   —  
   

    73.0

Current portion of long-term debt

   73.0
   

Long-term debt, net of current portion

  $—  
   

On February 6, 2009 we entered into a new three-year finance facility which provides for borrowings by us of up to $175.0$150 million including a term loan of $75.0$50 million and revolving credit facility of $100.0$100 million. The revolving credit facility can be drawn down upon until the financingfinance facility expires on June 12, 2009.February 6, 2012. The term loan is repayable as follows: $10 million is due on February 5, 2010; $15 million on February 7, 2011; and $25 million on February 6, 2012. This new finance facility replaced the previous finance facility which was in place at December 31, 2008.

The Company’s new finance facility contains restrictive clauses which may constrain our activities and limit our operational and financial flexibility. The new facility obliges the lenders to comply with a request for utilization of finance unless there is an event of default outstanding. Events of default are defined in the finance facility and include a material adverse change to our business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations. The new facility contains a number of restrictions that limit our ability, amongst other things, and subject to certain limited exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge our assets as security, guarantee obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change our line of business.

In addition, the new facility also contains terms which, if breached, would result in the loan becoming repayable on demand. It requires, among other matters, compliance with two financial covenant ratios. These ratios are (1) the ratio of net debt to EBITDA and (2) the ratio of net interest to EBITA.EBITDA. EBITDA and EBITA areis a non U.S. GAAP measuresmeasure of liquidity defined in the finance facility. In the event that the ratio of net debt to EBITDA exceeds 2.0 then in addition to these covenants, the facility also requires a “look forward” test and an additional financial covenant ratio in the form of net operating cash flow before finance costs to scheduled debt amortization and interest costs. This “look forward” test was not applicable to the Company during 2007 due to such ratio not being exceeded.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $81.0 million of debt outstanding under its senior credit facility agreement and was in compliance with all financial covenants therein. The debt profile as at December 31, 2007, including the principal facility, is set out below:

(in millions)


    

2008

  $20.0 

2009

   61.0 

2010

   —   
   


    81.0 

Current portion of long-term debt

   (20.0)
   


Long-term debt, net of current portion

  $61.0 
   


On January 31, 2008 the Company repaid the scheduled $20.0 million under the term loan facility and drew down $20.0 million under the revolving credit facility.

 

Pension Plans and Other Post-Employment Benefits

 

Effective for fiscal year 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. FAS 158 requires that the funded status of defined-benefit postretirement plans be recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and changes in the funded status be reflected in comprehensive

income. FAS 158 also requires the measurement date of the plan’s funded status to be the same as the Company’s fiscal year-end. Although the measurement date provision was not required to be adopted until fiscal year 2008 the Company early-adopted this provision for fiscal year 2006. The effect of applying FAS 158 was to record a total reduction to equity through recognition in other comprehensive loss of $97.0 million on an after-tax basis.

Contractual Commitments

 

The following represents contractual commitments at December 31, 20072008 and the effect of those obligations on future cash flows:-

 

(in millions)


  Total

  Less than 1
year


  1 to 3
Years


  4 to 5
years


  Over 5
years


  Total

  Less than 1
year


  1 to 3
Years


  4 to 5
years


  Over 5
years


Long-term debt obligations

  $81.0  $20.0  $61.0  $—    $—    $73.0  $73.0  $—    $—    $—  

Interest payments on debt

   2.0   2.0   —     —     —  

Planned funding of pension obligations

   28.8   5.8   11.5   11.5   —  

Remediation payments

   23.8   2.2   7.0   2.4   12.2   21.1   2.2   7.0   1.2   10.7

Severance payments

   2.4   1.9   0.5   —     —     0.5   0.5   —     —     —  

Raw material purchase obligations

   7.0   7.0   —     —     —     7.4   7.4   —     —     —  

Operating lease commitments

   6.9   1.5   2.3   1.0   2.1

Capital commitments

   1.6   1.6   —     —     —     1.4   1.4   —     —     —  

Operating lease commitments

   9.4   1.8   2.8   2.0   2.8

Interest payments on debt

   6.1   4.1   2.0   —     —  

Planned funding of pension obligations

   35.7   8.9   17.9   8.9   —  
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total

  $167.0  $47.5  $91.2  $13.3  $15.0  $141.1  $93.8  $20.8  $13.7  $12.8
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

At December 31, 20072008 long-term debt comprised a $75.0$55 million term loan and $6.0$18 million drawn under the revolving credit facility. At the same date long-term debt obligations representrepresented scheduled term loan repayments and amounts drawn under the revolving credit facility to be repaid when the previous financing facility expireswas due to expire on June 12, 2009.

The Company was subject to interest at variable rates on certain elements of its long-term debt. The estimated payments included in the table above assume a constant U.S. base interest rate of 0.5% on the main finance facility. Estimated commitment fees are also included and interest income is excluded.

On January 31, 2008 the Company repaid the scheduled $20.0February 6, 2009 we entered into a new three-year finance facility which provides for borrowings by us of up to $150 million under theincluding a term loan facilityof $50 million and drew down $20.0 million under the revolving credit facility.facility of $100 million. The revolving credit facility can be drawn down until the finance facility expires on February 6, 2012. The term loan is repayable as follows: $10 million is due on February 5, 2010; $15 million on February 7, 2011; and $25 million on February 6, 2012. This new finance facility replaced the previous finance facility which was in place at December 31, 2008.

 

The amounts related to the pension plan refer to the likely levels of Company funding of the United Kingdom contributory defined benefit pension plan and certain pension commitments to senior employees. It is not meaningful to predict an amount after five years since there are numerous uncertainties including future return on assets, pay escalation, pension increases, inflation and employment levels.

Remediation payments represent those cash flows that the Company is currently obligated to pay in respect of current and former facilities. It does not include any discretionary remediation costs that the Company may choose to incur.

 

Severance payments represent those cash flows that the Company is currently obligated to pay in respect of severance costs recognized under the conditions of FAS 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, and FAS 112,Employers’ Accounting for PostemploymentPost employment Benefits.

 

Raw material purchase obligations relate to certain long-term raw material contracts which have been entered into by the Company that stipulate fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancellable without penalty.

 

Capital commitments relate to certain capital projects that the Company has committed to undertake.

Operating lease commitments relate primarily to office space, motor vehicles and items of office equipment which are expected to be renewed and replaced in the normal course of business.

TheCapital commitments relate to certain capital projects that the Company is subjecthas committed to interest at variable rates on certain elements of its long-term debt. The estimated payments included in the table above assume a constant U.S. base interest rate of 3.5% on the main credit facility. Estimated commitment fees are also included and interest income is excluded.undertake.

 

The amountsDue to uncertainty regarding the completion of tax audits and possible outcomes the estimate of obligations related to unrecognized tax benefits cannot be made. Further disclosure is provided in Note 6 of the pension plan referNotes to the likely levels of Company funding of the United Kingdom contributory defined benefit pension plan and certain pension commitments to senior employees. It is not meaningful to predict an amount after five years since there are numerous uncertainties including future return on assets, pay escalation, pension increases, inflation and employment levels.Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Environmental Matters and Plant Closures

 

The Company is subject to environmental laws in all of the countries in which it operates. Under certain environmental laws the Company is responsible for the remediation of hazardous substances or wastes at currently or formerly owned or operated properties.

 

Most of our manufacturing operations have been conducted outside the U.S. and, therefore, any liability pertaining to the investigation and remediation of contaminated properties is likely to be determined under non-U.S. law.

 

We evaluate costs for remediation, decontamination and demolition projects on a regular basis. Full provision is made for those costs to which we are committed under environmental laws. Full provision has been made for the committed costs of $23.8 million.$25.1 million at December 31, 2008. Expenditure against provisions was $1.6 million, $1.7 million $1.3 million and $2.2$1.3 million in the years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively.

 

We have also incurred personnel severance costs in relation to the management of the decline in the Octane Additives market and the restructuring of the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses. Total severance expenditure was $1.6 million, $2.0 million, $7.0 million $9.7 million in the years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. Provision is made for severance costs under the conditions of FAS 146 and FAS 112.

Contingencies

Oil for Food

On February 7, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified the Company that it had commenced an investigation to determine whether any violations of law had occurred in connection with transactions conducted by the Company, including its wholly owned indirect subsidiary, Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH (“Alcor”), a Swiss company, under the United Nations Oil for Food Program (“OFFP”) between June 1, 1999 and December 31, 2003. As part of its investigation, the SEC issued a subpoena requiring the production of certain documents, including documents relating to these transactions, by the Company and Alcor. Upon receipt of the SEC’s notification and initial subpoena, the Company undertook a review of its participation in the OFFP. On October 10, 2007 and November 1, 2007 the SEC

served two additional subpoenas on the Company. These additional subpoenas required the production of documents relating notably to the OFFP but also relating to transactions conducted by the Company or its subsidiaries with state owned or controlled entities between June 1, 1999 and the date of such subpoenas, relating to its use of foreign agents and the possibility of extra-contractual payments made to secure business with foreign governmental entities. In a co-ordinated investigation, the Company has also been contacted by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding the possibility of violations of relevant laws in the areas contained in the SEC subpoenas as well as additional preliminary inquiries regarding compliance with anti-trust laws relating to U.S. and international tetra ethyl lead markets. The subjects into which the SEC and DOJ have inquired include areas that involve certain former and current executives of the Company including the current CEO. The Company, and its officers and directors, are cooperating with the SEC and DOJ investigations. On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company formed a committee comprised of the chairmen of the Board, the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee respectively, all of whom are independent directors. Counsel to the Company, providing assistance to the committee has, on behalf of the committee, conducted and will continue to conduct an investigation into the circumstances giving rise to the SEC and DOJ investigations. Counsel will report directly to the committee and will assist in connection with interactions with the SEC and DOJ. While the outcome of these investigations is uncertain, a number of companies involved in the OFFP investigations have been required to disgorge profits and pay civil fines and penalties up to $30 million. As a result of information discovered in the course of the investigation, we expect that we will be required to disgorge profits and pay fines and penalties that could be of similar magnitude. Any settlement of the SEC and DOJ inquiries relating to matters beyond the OFFP could require the Company to make significant additional disgorgements, penalty and fine payments. However at this time management is not able to predict with certainty the level of such fines and penalties. Because of the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome of these investigations and the costs to the Company of responding and participating in these on-going investigations, no assurance can be given that the ultimate costs and sanctions that may be imposed upon us will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities. At December 31, 2007 we have accrued $3.7 million in respect of probable future legal expenses in respect of this matter and have provided no additional accruals for this matter.

Inflation

Inflation has not been a significant factor for the Company over the last several years. Management believes that inflation will continue to be moderate over the next several years.

Cautionary Statement for Safe Harbor Purposes

Certain written and oral statements made by our Company and subsidiaries or with the approval of an authorized executive officer of our Company, including statements made in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations or elsewhere in this report and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,

may constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements which address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, including, without limitation, all of the Company’s guidance for revenues, gross margins, net income and other measures of financial performance. Although such statements are believed by management to be reasonable when made, caution should be exercised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. Risks, assumptions and uncertainties include, without limitation, changes in the terms of trading with significant customers or gain or loss thereof, our ability to continue to achieve organic growth in our Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses, our ability to successfully integrate any acquisitions in those business segments, the effects of changing government regulations and economic and market conditions, competition and changes in demand and business and legal risks inherent in non-U.S. activities, including political and economic uncertainty, import and export limitations and market risks related to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates, government investigations, material fines or other penalties resulting from the Company’s voluntary disclosure to the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice into the Company’s participation in the United Nations Oil for Food Program or other regulatory actions and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and those identified in the Company’s other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

The Company operates manufacturing and blending facilities, offices and laboratories around the world, though the largest manufacturing facility is located in the United Kingdom. The Company sells a range of Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals and Octane Additives to customers around the world. The Company uses floating rate debt to finance these global operations. Consequently, the Company is subject to business risks inherent in non-U.S. activities, including political and economic uncertainty, import and export limitations, and market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The political and economic risks are mitigated by the stability of the countries in which the Company’s largest operations are located. Credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation and account monitoring procedures are used to minimize bad debt risk. Collateral is not generally required.

 

The Company uses derivatives, including interest rate swaps, commodity swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts, in the normal course of business to manage market risks. The derivatives used in hedging activities are considered risk management tools and are not used for trading purposes. In addition, the Company enters into derivative instruments with a diversified group of major financial institutions in order to monitor the exposure to non-performance of such instruments. The Company’s objective in managing exposure to changes in interest rates is to limit the impact of such changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. The Company’s objective in managing the exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates is to reduce volatility on earnings and cash flows associated with such changes.

 

The Company offers fixed prices for some long-term sales contracts. As manufacturing costs and raw materials are subject to variability the Company uses commodity swaps to hedge the price of some raw materials thus reducing volatility on earnings and cash flows. The derivatives are considered risk management tools and are not used for trading purposes. The Company’s objective is to manage its exposure to fluctuating prices of raw materials.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

The Company uses interest swaps to manage interest rate exposure. As of December 31, 20072008 the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $24.3$13.9 million, no bank overdraft and long-term debt (including current portion) of $81.0$73.0 million. The long-term debt comprised $75.0$55.0 million senior term loan and $6.0$18.0 million revolving credit.

 

In 2005 and 2007 the Company entered into interest swap agreements to convert floating rate debt to fixed rate that cover $30.0$50.0 million and $20.0 million, respectively, of the remaining long-term debt (including current portion) as at December 31, 20072008 of $81.0$73.0 million. On the basis that $50.0 million of the $81.0$73.0 million long-term debt (including current portion) is hedged against interest movements and that the Company would receive interest on the $24.3$13.9 million positive cash balances, then the interest payable on unhedged debt of $31.0$23.0 million is largely coveredoffset by the interest receivable on positive cash balances.balances which have a similar maturity profile. On a gross basis, assuming no additional interest on the cash balances, a hypothetical absolute change of 1% in U.S. base interest rates on the gross amount of these balances of $31.0$23.0 million for a one-year period would impact net income and cash flows by approximately $0.2 million before tax.

The above does not consider the effect of interest or exchange rate changes on overall activity nor management action to mitigate such changes.

 

Exchange Rate Risk

 

The Company generates an element of its revenues and incurs some operating costs in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar.

 

The Company evaluates the functional currency of each reporting unit according to the economic environment in which it operates. Several major subsidiaries of the Company operating outside of the U.S. have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency due to the nature of the markets in which they operate. In addition, the financial position and results of operations of some of our foreign subsidiaries are reported in the relevant local currency and then translated to U.S. dollars at the applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements.

 

The primary foreign currencies in which we have exchange rate fluctuation exposure are the European Union euro and British pound sterling. Changes in exchange rates between these foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect the recorded levels of our assets and liabilities, to the extent such figures reflect the inclusion of foreign assets and liabilities that are translated into U.S. dollars for presentation in our financial statements, as well as our results of operations.

 

The Company’s objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency rate changes. Accordingly, the Company enters into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the U.S. dollar value of its existing foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, commitments, and cash flows. The Company also uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts to offset a portion of the Company’s exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the U.S. dollar value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues. The objective of the hedging program is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

The trading of our three business segments areis inherently naturally hedged and accordingly changes in exchange rates would not be material to our earnings or financial position. Corporate costs however are largely denominated in British pound sterling. A 5% strengthening in the U.S. dollar against British pound sterling would increase reported operating income by approximately $1.3 million.$1.1 million excluding the impact of any foreign currency forward exchange contracts.

 

Where a 5% strengthening of the U.S. dollar has been used as an illustration, a 5% weakening would be expected to have the opposite effect on operating income.

Raw Material Price Risk

 

We use a variety of raw materials, chemicals and energy in our manufacturing and blending processes. Many of the raw materials that we use are derived from petrochemical-based feedstocks which can be subject to periods of rapid and significant price instability. These fluctuations in price can be caused by political instability in oil producing nations and elsewhere, or other factors influencing global supply and demand over which we have no or little control. Innospec has entered hedging arrangements for certain raw materials, but does not typically enter into hedging arrangements for all raw materials, chemicals or energy costs. Should costs of raw materials, chemicals or energy increase, and should Innospec’s businesses not be able to pass on these cost increases to our customers, then operating margins and cash flows from operating activities would be adversely impacted. Should raw material prices increase significantly, then the Company’s need for working capital could increase which would adversely impact cash flows from operating activities.

Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Innospec Inc.:

 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Innospec Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20072008 and December 31, 2006,2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20072008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in “Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” appearing in Item 9A of this Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for share based compensation on adoption of FAS 123R,Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006, defined benefit pension plans on adoption of FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, effective December 31, 2006, and uncertain tax positions on adoption of FIN 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective January 1, 2007.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and

procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately

and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Manchester, United Kingdom

February 25, 200820, 2009

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in millions, except per share data)data)

 

  Years ended December 31

   Years ended December 31

 
  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

 2007

 2006

 

Net sales (Note 3)

  $602.4  $532.1  $564.8   $640.5  $602.4  $532.1 

Cost of goods sold

   (405.0)  (345.4)  (364.7)   (454.1)  (405.0)  (345.4)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Gross profit (Note 3)

   197.4   186.7   200.1    186.4   197.4   186.7 

Operating expenses:

      

Selling, general and administrative

   (103.9)  (99.0)  (108.2)   (115.2)  (103.9)  (99.0)

Research and development

   (13.6)  (11.1)  (11.2)   (14.8)  (13.6)  (11.1)

Restructuring charge

   (3.0)  (4.5)  (31.3)   (2.1)  (3.0)  (4.5)

Amortization of intangible assets

   (16.9)  (12.7)  (12.7)   (7.4)  (16.9)  (12.7)

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill (Note 9)

   (12.1)  (36.7)  (134.4)

Profit on disposals, net (Note 20)

   —     9.2   —   

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill (Note 8)

   (3.7)  (12.1)  (36.7)

Profit on disposals, net (Note 19)

   0.4   —     9.2 
  


 


 


  


 


 


   (149.5)  (154.8)  (297.8)   (142.8)  (149.5)  (154.8)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Operating income/(loss) (Note 3)

   47.9   31.9   (97.7)

Operating income (Note 3)

   43.6   47.9   31.9 

Other net (expense)/income

   (19.3)  6.9   6.8 

Interest expense

   (9.5)  (12.1)  (9.5)   (6.4)  (9.5)  (12.1)

Interest income

   2.5   5.3   1.9    1.0   2.5   5.3 

Other net income/(expense)

   6.9   6.8   (12.6)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interest

   47.8   31.9   (117.9)

Income before income taxes and minority interest

   18.9   47.8   31.9 

Minority interest

   (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.2)   (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.1)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Income/(loss) before income taxes

   47.7   31.8   (118.1)

Income before income taxes

   18.8   47.7   31.8 

Income taxes (Note 7)

   (18.2)  (20.4)  (4.2)   (6.3)  (18.2)  (20.4)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Income/(loss) from continuing operations

   29.5   11.4   (122.3)

Discontinued operations, net of tax (Note 21)

   —     —     (1.4)

Net income

  $12.5  $29.5  $11.4 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Net income/(loss)

  $29.5  $11.4  $(123.7)
  


 


 


Earnings/(loss) per share (Note 5)

   

Basic

  $1.23  $0.47  $(5.00)
  


 


 


Diluted

  $1.19  $0.45  $(5.00)
  


 


 


Earnings/(loss) per share – continuing operations (Note 5)

   

Earnings per share (Note 5)

   

Basic

  $1.23  $0.47  $(4.94)  $0.53  $1.23  $0.47 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Diluted

  $1.19  $0.45  $(4.94)  $0.51  $1.19  $0.45 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands) (Note 5)

      

Basic

   23,920   24,141   24,737    23,595   23,920   24,141 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Diluted

   24,838   25,339   24,737    24,391   24,838   25,339 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Dividend declared per common share

  $0.10  $0.09  $0.08 
  


 


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except per share data)data)

 

  At December 31

   At December 31

 
  2007

 2006

   2008

 2007

 

Assets

      

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $24.3  $101.9   $13.9  $24.3 

Accounts receivable (less allowance of $2.0 and $2.5, respectively)

   94.2   78.3 

Accounts receivable (less allowance of $2.8 and $2.0, respectively)

   89.9   94.2 

Inventories

      

Finished goods

   100.4   83.7    95.0   100.4 

Work in progress

   12.6   25.2    2.0   12.6 

Raw materials

   19.6   11.1    41.3   19.6 
  


 


  


 


Total inventories

   132.6   120.0    138.3   132.6 

Prepaid expenses

   5.0   5.1    4.4   5.0 

Prepaid income taxes

   10.1   —   
  


 


  


 


Total current assets

   256.1   305.3    256.6   256.1 

Property, plant and equipment (Note 12)

   66.2   66.5 

Goodwill – Octane Additives (Note 9)

   12.7   24.8 

Goodwill – Other (Note 9)

   139.1   139.0 

Intangible assets (Note 10)

   41.9   30.2 

Property, plant and equipment (Note 11)

   53.5   66.2 

Goodwill – Octane Additives (Note 8)

   9.0   12.7 

Goodwill – Other (Note 8)

   139.2   139.1 

Intangible assets (Note 9)

   28.3   41.9 

Pension asset (Note 6)

   34.8   —      —     34.8 

Deferred finance costs (Note 11)

   0.3   1.6 

Deferred finance costs (Note 10)

   0.5   0.3 

Deferred income taxes (Note 7)

   —     1.6    7.2   —   
  


 


  


 


Total assets

  $551.1  $569.0   $494.3  $551.1 
  


 


  


 


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

      

Current liabilities

      

Accounts payable

  $50.9  $50.0   $55.4  $50.9 

Accrued liabilities

   65.7   55.5    46.3   65.7 

Accrued income taxes

   6.9   14.7    —     6.9 

Short-term borrowing (Note 14)

   20.0   15.1 

Current portion of plant closure provisions (Note 13)

   4.4   5.6 

Short-term borrowing (Note 13)

   73.0   20.0 

Current portion of plant closure provisions (Note 12)

   4.1   4.4 

Current portion of unrecognized tax benefits (Note 7)

   12.6   —      9.2   12.6 

Current portion of deferred income (Note 15)

   0.1   2.0 

Current portion of deferred tax (Note 7)

   0.1   —   

Current portion of deferred income (Note 14)

   0.1   0.1 

Current portion of deferred income taxes (Note 7)

   —     0.1 
  


 


  


 


Total current liabilities

   160.7   142.9    188.1   160.7 

Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 14)

   61.0   133.0 

Plant closure provisions, net of current portion (Note 13)

   22.4   22.2 

Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 13)

   —     61.0 

Plant closure provisions, net of current portion (Note 12)

   22.8   22.4 

Unrecognized tax benefits, net of current portion (Note 7)

   27.4   —      25.6   27.4 

Deferred income taxes (Note 7)

   7.3   —   

Deferred income taxes, net of current portion (Note 7)

   —     7.3 

Pension liability (Note 6)

   —     22.5    13.8   —   

Other liabilities

   —     22.4 

Deferred income, net of current portion (Note 15)

   0.8   0.9 

Minority interest

   —     0.1 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)

   —     —   

Stockholders’ Equity (Note 16)

   

Other non-current liabilities

   13.9   —   

Deferred income, net of current portion (Note 14)

   0.8   0.8 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)

   —     —   

Stockholders’ Equity (Note 15)

   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized

      

40,000,000 shares, issued 29,554,500 shares

   0.3   0.1    0.3   0.3 

Additional paid-in capital

   280.6   281.7    282.5   280.6 

Treasury stock (5,777,417 and 5,749,494 shares at cost, respectively)

   (58.2)  (44.7)

Treasury stock (5,956,384 and 5,777,417 shares at cost, respectively)

   (64.9)  (58.2)

Retained earnings

   121.5   97.9    131.6   121.5 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (72.7)  (110.0)   (120.2)  (72.7)
  


 


  


 


Total stockholders’ equity

   271.5   225.0    229.3   271.5 
  


 


  


 


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $551.1  $569.0   $494.3  $551.1 
  


 


  


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

 

 Years ended December 31

  Years ended December 31

 
 2007

 2006

 2005

  2008

 2007

 2006

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

  

Net income/(loss)

 $29.5  $11.4  $(123.7)

Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Net income

 $12.5  $29.5  $11.4 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Depreciation and amortization

  31.3   27.4   28.7   23.0   31.3   27.4 

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill (Note 9)

  12.1   36.7   134.4 

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill (Note 8)

  3.7   12.1   36.7 

Deferred income taxes

  (4.6)  (2.0)  (5.0)  (1.1)  (4.6)  (2.0)

(Profit)/loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

  —     (9.2)  2.8��  (0.4)  —     (9.2)

Non-cash intangible assets other adjustments

  6.3   —     —   

Changes in working capital:

  

Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses

  (14.5)  (11.1)  15.5   2.3   (14.5)  (11.1)

Inventories

  (12.0)  (21.0)  (20.3)  (8.6)  (12.0)  (21.0)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  12.4   (7.4)  6.0   (9.8)  12.4   (7.4)

Excess tax benefit from stock based payment arrangements

  (0.2)  —     —     (2.5)  (0.2)  —   

Income taxes and other current liabilities

  (3.5)  20.9   (22.5)  (17.2)  (3.5)  20.9 

Impairment in carrying value of unconsolidated investments

  —     —     6.6 

Movement on plant closure provisions

  (1.3)  (3.9)  2.1   0.2   (1.3)  (3.9)

Movement on pension asset/(liability)

  (2.4)  (3.0)  10.0   (5.1)  (2.4)  (3.0)

Stock option compensation charge

  3.3   1.6   —     4.1   3.3   1.6 

Movements on other non-current liabilities

  0.1   (2.0)  11.3   7.0   0.1   (2.0)

Movement on deferred income

  (2.3)  (2.0)  (2.1)  —     (2.3)  (2.0)
 


 


 


 


 


 


Net cash provided by operating activities

  47.9   36.4   43.8   14.4   47.9   36.4 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

  

Capital expenditures

  (12.2)  (7.6)  (8.3)  (9.1)  (12.2)  (7.6)

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net

  —     9.6   —     1.3   —     9.6 

Business combinations, net of cash acquired

  —     —     (22.3)

Acquisition of intangible asset (Note 10)

  (28.4)  —     —   

Proceeds from disposal of subsidiary

  —     —     2.8 

Acquisition of intangible asset (Note 9)

  —     (28.4)  —   

Disposal of unconsolidated investment

  —     2.6   —     —     —     2.6 
 


 


 


 


 


 


Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities

  (40.6)  4.6   (27.8)  (7.8)  (40.6)  4.6 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

  

Net (repayment)/receipt of revolving credit facility

  (52.0)  18.0   20.3 

Receipt of term loan

  —     —     100.0 

Net receipt/(repayment) of revolving credit facility

  12.0   (52.0)  18.0 

Repayment of term loan

  (15.0)  (10.0)  (100.0)  (20.0)  (15.0)  (10.0)

Payments on capital leases

  (0.1)  (0.2)  —     —     (0.1)  (0.2)

Refinancing costs

  —     (0.5)  (2.0)  (0.4)  —     (0.5)

Dividends paid

  (2.2)  (1.9)  (1.7)

Dividend paid

  (2.4)  (2.2)  (1.9)

Excess tax benefit from stock based payment arrangements

  0.2   —     —     2.5   0.2   —   

Issue of treasury stock

  4.1   3.0   1.4   1.9   4.1   3.0 

Repurchase of common stock

  (20.0)  (15.6)  (2.5)  (10.5)  (20.0)  (15.6)

Minority interest dividends (paid)

  (0.1)  (0.2)  —     (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.2)
 


 


 


 


 


 


Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities

  (85.1)  (7.4)  15.5 

Net cash (used in) financing activities

  (17.0)  (85.1)  (7.4)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

  0.2   (0.6)  4.1   —     0.2   (0.6)
 


 


 


 


 


 


Net change in cash and cash equivalents

  (77.6)  33.0   35.6   (10.4)  (77.6)  33.0 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  101.9   68.9   33.3   24.3   101.9   68.9 
 


 


 


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $24.3  $101.9  $68.9  $13.9  $24.3  $101.9 
 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Amortization of deferred finance costs of $0.5 million (2007 – $1.1 million, (20062006 – $1.1 million) for the year are included in depreciation and amortization in the cash flow statement but in interest in the income statement. Cash payments/receipts in respect of income taxes and interest are disclosed in Note 7 and Note 14,13, respectively.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in millions)

 

 Common
Stock


 Additional
Paid-In
Capital


 Treasury
Stock


 Retained
Earnings


 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss


 Total
Stockholders’
Equity


  Common
Stock


 Additional
Paid-In
Capital


 Treasury
Stock


 Retained
Earnings


 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss


 Total
Stockholders’
Equity


 

Balance at December 31, 2004

 $0.1 $276.5  $(31.2) $213.8  $(13.4) $445.8 

Net loss

  —    —     —     (123.7)  —     (123.7)

Dividend ($0.07
per share)
(1)

  —    —     —     (1.7)  —     (1.7)

Net CTA change(2)

  —    —     —     —     (4.9)  (4.9)

Treasury stock re-issued

  —    —     1.7   —     —     1.7 

Treasury stock repurchased

  —    —     (2.5)  —     —     (2.5)

Redemption of treasury stock

  —    (0.3)  —     —     —     (0.3)
 

 


 


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2005

 $0.1 $276.2  $(32.0) $88.4  $(18.3) $314.4 

December 31, 2005

 $0.1 $276.2  $(32.0) $88.4  $(18.3) $314.4 

Net income

  —    —     —     11.4   —     11.4   —    —     —     11.4   —     11.4 

Dividend ($0.08
per share)
(1)

  —    —     —     (1.9)  —     (1.9)  —    —     —     (1.9)  —     (1.9)

Net CTA change(2)

  —    —     —     —     5.0   5.0   —    —     —     —     5.0   5.0 

Derivatives(3)

  —    —     —     —     0.3   0.3   —    —     —     —     0.3   0.3 

Treasury stock re-issued

  —    0.1   2.9   —     —     3.0   —    0.1   2.9   —     —     3.0 

Treasury stock repurchased

  —    —     (15.6)  —     —     (15.6)  —    —     (15.6)  —     —     (15.6)

Stock option compensation charge(4)

  —    5.4   —     —     —     5.4   —    5.4   —     —     —     5.4 

Adjustment for initially applying FAS 158

  —    —     —     —     (138.5)  (138.5)  —    —     —     —     (138.5)  (138.5)

Tax benefit on adjustment
for initially applying
FAS 158

  —    —     —     —     41.5   41.5 

Tax impact on adjustment for initially applying FAS 158

  —    —     —     —     41.5   41.5 
 

 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2006

 $0.1 $281.7  $(44.7) $97.9  $(110.0) $225.0  $0.1 $281.7  $(44.7) $97.9  $(110.0) $225.0 

Net income

  —    —     —     29.5   —     29.5   —    —     —     29.5   —     29.5 

Dividend ($0.09
per share)
(1)

  —    —     —     (2.2)  —     (2.2)  —    —     —     (2.2)  —     (2.2)

Derivatives(3)

  —    —     —     —     (0.9)  (0.9)  —    —     —     —     (0.9)  (0.9)

Treasury stock re-issued

  —    (0.6)  6.5   —     —     5.9   —    (0.6)  6.5   —     —     5.9 

Treasury stock repurchased

  —    —     (20.0)  —     —     (20.0)  —    —     (20.0)  —     —     (20.0)

Stock option compensation charge

  —    (0.3)  —     —     —     (0.3)  —    (0.3)  —     —     —     (0.3)

Two-for-one common stock split(1)

  0.2  (0.2)  —     —     —     —     0.2  (0.2)  —     —     —     —   

Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
(Note 7)

  —    —     —     (3.1)  —     (3.1)  —    —     —     (3.1)  —     (3.1)

Amortization of net actuarial losses (Note 6)

  —    —     —     (2.0)  2.0   —     —    —     —     (2.0)  2.0   —   

Tax benefit on amortization of net actuarial losses

  —    —     —     0.6   (0.6)  —   

Tax impact on amortization of net actuarial losses

  —    —     —     0.6   (0.6)  —   

Actuarial net gains arising during the year (Note 6)

  —    —     —     —     55.0   55.0   —    —     —     —     55.0   55.0 

Tax benefit on actuarial net gains arising during the year

  —    —     —     (2.0)  (15.4)  (17.4)

Tax impact on actuarial net gains arising during the year

  —    —     —     (2.0)  (15.4)  (17.4)

Deferred taxes(5)

  —    —     —     2.8   (2.8)  —     —    —     —     2.8   (2.8)  —   
 

 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2007

 $0.3 $280.6  $(58.2) $121.5  $(72.7) $271.5  $0.3 $280.6  $(58.2) $121.5  $(72.7) $271.5 

Net income

  —    —     —     12.5   —     12.5 

Dividend
($0.10 per share)
(1)

  —    —     —     (2.4)  —     (2.4)

Net CTA change(2)

  —    —     —     —     (15.8)  (15.8)

Derivatives(3)

  —    —     —     —     (0.9)  (0.9)

Treasury stock re-issued

  —    (0.4)  3.8   —     —     3.4 

Treasury stock repurchased

  —    —     (10.5)  —     —     (10.5)

Stock option compensation charge

  —    2.3   —     —     —     2.3 

Actuarial net losses arising during the year (Note 6)

  —    —     —     —     (42.8)  (42.8)

Tax benefit on actuarial net losses arising during the year

  —    —     —     —     12.0   12.0 
 

 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2008

 $0.3 $282.5  $(64.9) $131.6  $(120.2) $229.3 
 

 


 


 


 


 


(1)On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The table above has been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.
(2)Changes in cumulative translation adjustment.
(3)Changes in unrealized gains/(losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax.
(4)Following adoption of FAS 123R effective January 1, 2006 a stock option liability of $3.0 million accrued under APB 25 was reclassified to Additional Paid-In Capital.
(5)Impact on deferred taxes of a change in the associated tax rate on the unrecognized actuarial net losses of $138.5 million ($97.0 million net of deferred taxes) previously recognized in other comprehensive loss.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)/INCOME

(in millions)

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the years ended December 31


  2007

  2006

  2005

 

Net income/(loss) for the year

  $29.5  $11.4  $(123.7)

Changes in cumulative translation adjustment

   —     5.0   (4.9)

Unrealized (losses)/gains on derivative instruments, net of tax

   (0.9)  0.3   —   

Amortization of net actuarial losses, net of tax of $0.6 million

   1.4   —     —   

Actuarial net gains arising during the year, net of tax of $15.4 million

   39.6   —     —   
   


 

  


Total comprehensive income/(loss)

  $69.6  $16.7  $(128.6)
   


 

  


Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the years ended December 31


  2008

  2007

  2006

Net income for the year

  $12.5  $29.5  $11.4

Changes in cumulative translation adjustment

   (15.8)  —     5.0

Unrealized (losses)/gains on derivative instruments, net of tax

   (0.9)  (0.9)  0.3

Amortization of net actuarial losses, net of tax of $0.6 million

   —     1.4   —  

Actuarial net (losses)/gains arising during the year, net of tax

   (30.8)  39.6   —  
   


 


 

Total comprehensive (loss)/income

  $(35.0) $69.6  $16.7
   


 


 

 

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(in millions)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31


  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

 2007

 2006

 

Cumulative translation adjustment

  $(13.4) $(13.4) $(18.4)  $(29.2) $(13.4) $(13.4)

Unrealized (losses)/gains on derivative instruments, net of tax

   (0.5)  0.4   0.1 

Unrecognized actuarial net losses, net of tax of $22.7 million and $41.5 million, respectively

   (58.8)  (97.0)  —   

Unrealized (losses)/gains on derivative instruments, net of tax of $0.6 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively

   (1.4)  (0.5)  0.4 

Unrecognized actuarial net losses, net of tax of $34.7 million, $22.7 million and $41.5 million, respectively

   (89.6)  (58.8)  (97.0)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  $(72.7) $(110.0) $(18.3)  $(120.2) $(72.7) $(110.0)
  


 


 


  


 


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1.     Nature of Operations

 

Innospec Inc. develops, manufactures, blends and markets fuel additives and other specialty chemicals. Our products are sold primarily to oil refineries and other chemical and industrial companies throughout the world. Our fuel additives help improve fuel efficiency, boost engine performance and reduce harmful emissions. Our specialty chemicals provide effective technology-based solutions for our customers’ processes or products focused in the Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; and Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & PaperIngredients markets. Principal product lines and reportable segments are Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals and Octane Additives.

 

See Note 3 for financial information on the Company’s reportable segments.

 

See Note 109 for the accounting in respect of sales and marketing agreements with Ethyl.

 

On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.

 

Note 2.     Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Preparation:The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and include all subsidiaries of the Company where the Company has a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany accounts and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. All acquisitions are accounted for as purchases and the results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The results of discontinued operations are shown separately in the income statement. Certain revisions have been made to prior year components of cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to current year classifications. This change in presentation did not result in a change to net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities.

 

Use of Estimates:The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Cash Equivalents:Investment securities with maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.

 

Accounts Receivable:The Company records accounts receivable at net realizable value and maintains an allowance for customers not making required payments. The Company

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

determines the adequacy of the allowance by periodically evaluating each customer receivable considering our customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic conditions.

 

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (FIFO method) or market price. Cost includes materials, labor, and an appropriate proportion of plant overheads. The Company accrues volume discounts where it is probable that the required volume will be attained and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The discounts are recorded as a reduction in the cost of materials based on projected purchases over the period of the agreement. Provision is made for slow-moving or obsolete inventories as appropriate.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment:Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The cost of additions and improvements are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expenses. When assets are sold or retired the associated cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the consolidated financial statements and any related gain or loss is included in earnings. The estimated useful lives of the major classes of depreciable assets are as follows:

 

Buildings

  7 to 25 years

Equipment

  3 to 10 years

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:Goodwill and other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are subject to at least annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The annual measurement date for impairment testing of Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals goodwill is December 31. Octane Additives business goodwill is reviewed for impairment at the end of each quarter. The Company regularly reviews goodwill and the other intangible assets for impairmenttests based on projected post-tax cash flows discounted at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. The annual measurement date for impairment testing of the goodwill relating to the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses is December 31. Octane Additives business goodwill is tested for impairment at the end of each quarter. As expected the decline in the Octane Additives market has resulted in quarterly impairment charges being incurred from the first quarter of 2004 onwards. It is highly likely that further quarterly charges will be incurred in future years as the market continues to decline. The impairment reviewstests of the goodwill relating to the Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses indicatesindicated that there is no requirement to recognize an impairment charge in respect of this goodwill. Other intangible assets deemed to have finite lives continue to be amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives and tested for any potential impairment when events occur or circumstances change which suggest that an impairment may have occurred.

 

Deferred Finance Costs:The costs relating to debt financing are capitalized, separately disclosed in the balance sheets and amortized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the debt financing facility.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

ImpairmentImpairment of Long-Lived Assets: The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets, including buildings and equipment, whenever changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying values may be impaired. In order to facilitate this test the Company groups together assets at the lowest possible level for which cash flow information is available.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the assets are compared with the carrying value of the assets and if they are lower an impairment loss may be recognized. The amount of the impairment loss is the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the assets. Fair values are determined using post-tax cash flows discounted at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments:The Company uses various derivative instruments including forward currency contracts, options, interest rate swaps and commodity swaps to manage certain exposures. These instruments are entered into under the Company’s corporate risk management policy to minimize exposure and are not for speculative trading purposes. FAS 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and, requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not designated as hedges, or do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under FAS 133, are recognized in earnings. Derivatives are tested for effectiveness on a quarterly basis. The ineffective portion of the derivative’s change in value is recognized in earnings. The effective portion is recognized in other comprehensive loss until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company employs interest rate swaps which convert floating rate debt on $50.0 million of the remaining $75.0 million senior term loan to fixed rate. These have been designated as cash flow hedges of the underlying variable rate obligation. These have been tested for effectiveness using the dollar offset method. At the end of the term of the swap arrangements the cumulative gain or loss will be reclassified to the income statement. The interest rate swaps have been recorded as a non-current liability in the balance sheet. In 2007At December 31, 2008 the Company had hedged the price of 4503,101 metric tonnes of one of its key raw materials using commodity swaps. These swaps have maturity dates between 1 and 12 months and as at December 31 20072008 the market value of the swaps to the Company was a loss of $0.5$1.3 million. These swaps have been designated as qualifying for hedge accounting. At the end of the swap arrangements the cumulative gain or loss will be reclassified to the income statement. These commodity swaps have been recorded as a non-current liability in the balance sheet.

 

Environmental Compliance and Remediation: Environmental compliance costs include ongoing maintenance, monitoring and similar costs. Environmental costs are accrued when environmental assessments or remedial efforts are probable and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future obligations are discounted to their present values using the Company’s weighted average cost of capital.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Revenue Recognition:The Company supplies products to customers from its various manufacturing sites, and in some instances from containers held on customer sites, under a variety of standard shipping terms and conditions. In each case revenue is recognized when the transfer of legal title, which is defined and generally accepted in the standard terms and conditions, arises between the Company and the customer. Provisions for sales discounts and rebates to customers are based upon the terms of sales contracts and are recorded in the same

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

period as the related sales as a deduction from revenue. The Company estimates the provision for sales discounts and rebates based on the terms of each agreement at the time of shipping. The Company recognized the total revenue from Octane Additive sales under the Ethyl agreements. The 32% compensation which was paid to Ethyl was recognized in cost of goods sold. A component of Ethyl’s share of net proceeds was an amount recoverable from Ethyl that was calculated annually in arrears. The Company recognized this quarterly based on best current estimates of the expected outcome. See Note 109 for the accounting in respect of sales and marketing agreements with Ethyl.

 

Components of Net Sales:All amounts billed to customers relating to shipping and handling are classified as net sales. Shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company are classified as cost of goods sold.

 

Components of Cost of Goods Sold:Cost of goods sold is comprised of raw material costs including inbound freight, duty and non-recoverable taxes, inbound handling costs associated with the receipt of raw materials, packaging materials, manufacturing costs including labor costs, maintenance and utility costs, plant and engineering overheads, warehousing and outbound shipping costs and handling costs. Inventory losses and provisions and the costs of customer claims are also recognized in the cost of goods line item. The 32% compensation which was paid to Ethyl was recognized in cost of goods sold (see Note 109 for the accounting in respect of sales and marketing agreements with Ethyl).

 

Components of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:Selling expenses comprise the costs of the direct sales force and the sales management and customer service departments required to support them. It also comprises commission charges, the costs of sales conferences and trade shows, the cost of advertising and promotions and the cost of bad and doubtful debts. General and administrative expenses comprise the cost of support functions including accounting, human resources, information technology and the cost of group functions including corporate management, finance, tax, treasury, investor relations and legal departments. Provision of management’s best estimate of legal costs for litigation in which the Company is involved is made and reported in the administrative expense line item.

 

Research and Development Expenses:Research, development and testing costs are expensed to the income statement as incurred.

 

Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of options that are dilutive and outstanding during the period.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Foreign Currencies:The Company’s policy is that exchange differences arising on the translation of the balance sheets of entities that have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are taken to a separate equity reserve, the cumulative translation adjustment. In entities where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency no gains or losses on translation occur. In these entities gains or losses on monetary assets relating to currencies other than the

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

U.S. dollar are taken to the income statement. Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are included in other net income/(expense)/income in the income statement and were $7.5$6.3 million net gain, $7.6loss, $8.2 million net gain and $3.7$6.5 million net lossgain in 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively.

 

Stock OptionShare Based Compensation Plans: Effective January 1, 2006 the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 123R,Share-Based Payment, which requires employee stock options to be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly share-based compensation is now measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the options. Prior to January 1, 2006 the Company accounted for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”), and related interpretations, and provided the required pro forma disclosures prescribed by FAS 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,and FAS 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure. Under APB 25, for fixed awards, when the exercise price of employee stock options was equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense was recorded. The Company adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method the compensation cost recognized by the Company beginning in 2006 includes (a) compensation cost for all stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all stock options granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. The Company uses the straight-line attribution method to recognize share-based compensation costs over the service period of the option.

 

Pension Plans and Other Post-Employment Benefits: Effective for fiscal year 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement PlansPlans.. FAS 158 requires that the funded status of defined-benefit postretirement plans be recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and changes in the funded status be reflected in comprehensive income. FAS 158 also requires the measurement date of the plan’s funded status to be the same as the Company’s fiscal year-end. Although the measurement date provision was not required to be adopted until fiscal year 2008 the Company early-adopted this provision for fiscal year 2006. Pension plans are accounted for in accordance with FAS 87,Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,, FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansand FAS88,Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination BenefitsBenefits..

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Income Taxes:The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with FAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the relevant tax bases of the assets and liabilities. When appropriate, in accordance with FAS 109, the Company evaluates the need for a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets. FAS 109 requires the recognition of future

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

tax benefits to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Income tax positions must meet a more likely than not recognition criteria at the adoption date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 and the provisions have been applied to all income tax positions from that date. On adoption of FIN 48 the Company recognized an increase in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $3.1 million which was accounted for as an adjustment to opening retained earnings; and reclassifications of $21.0 million from other liabilities, $3.8 million from deferred income taxes and $7.8 million from accrued income taxes. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income taxes in our consolidated statements of income.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 3.    Business Segment and Geographical Area Data

 

Innospec divides its business into three distinct segments for both management and reporting purposes: Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals (previously Performance Chemicals as explained below) and Octane Additives. The Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals businesses both operate in markets where we actively seek growth opportunities albeit their end customers are very different. The Octane Additives business, although still profitable, is characterized by substantial declining demand.

 

On October 1, 2007June 23, 2008 the Company announced a further streamlining of its fast-growing Performance Chemicals divisionbusiness into a unified, sales-led global business focused on rapidly meeting customers’ needs anywhere in the world. The Company is moving to an integrated regional model running its growth businesses as one streamlined business operating across three geographical regions – Americas, EMEA (i.e. Europe, Middle East and five core industry sectors. This led toAfrica), and ASPAC (i.e. Asia-Pacific). The Company will report its financial performance based on the segment being re-branded undersegments contained within this integrated regional model when the banner “Active Chemicals.” The five core industry sectors are Personal Care; Household, Industrial & Institutional; Fragrance Ingredients; Plastics & Polymers and Pulp & Paper markets.Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews the Company’s operating results primarily on this basis.

 

In 20072008 the Company had one significant customer in the Fuel Specialties business, Royal Dutch Shell plc and its affiliates (“Shell”), who accounted for $66.2$84.6 million (11%(13%) of net group sales. In 20062007 Shell accounted for 11% of net group sales and 2005in 2006 no single customer accounted for more than 10% of net group sales.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on operating income. The following table analyzes sales and other financial information by business segment:the Company’s reportable segments:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

 2007

 2006

 

Net sales:

   

Net sales

   

Fuel Specialties

  $374.6  $311.3  $257.1   $440.9  $374.6  $311.3 

Active Chemicals

   133.8   120.4   109.4    138.3   133.8   120.4 

Octane Additives

   94.0   100.4   198.3    61.3   94.0   100.4 
  


 


 


  


 


 


  $602.4  $532.1  $564.8   $640.5  $602.4  $532.1 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Gross profit:

   

Gross profit

   

Fuel Specialties

  $124.7  $106.2  $83.5   $145.6  $124.7  $106.2 

Active Chemicals

   24.6   22.7   17.6    12.5   24.6   22.7 

Octane Additives

   48.1   57.8   99.0    28.3   48.1   57.8 
  


 


 


  


 


 


  $197.4  $186.7  $200.1   $186.4  $197.4  $186.7 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Operating income:

   

Operating income

   

Fuel Specialties

  $63.6  $45.7  $26.2   $80.0  $63.6  $45.7 

Active Chemicals

   6.1   5.8   1.0    (5.0)  6.1   5.8 

Octane Additives

   19.9   34.5   69.2    1.2   19.9   34.5 

FAS 158/87 pension charge

   (4.6)  —     (1.7)

FAS 158/87 pension (charge)

   (2.3)  (4.6)  —   

Corporate costs

   (22.0)  (22.1)  (26.7)   (24.9)  (22.0)  (22.1)

Restructuring charge

   (3.0)  (4.5)  (31.3)   (2.1)  (3.0)  (4.5)

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   (12.1)  (36.7)  (134.4)   (3.7)  (12.1)  (36.7)

Profit on disposals (net)

   —     9.2   —      0.4   —     9.2 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Operating income/(loss)

  $47.9  $31.9  $(97.7)

Total operating income

  $43.6  $47.9  $31.9 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Identifiable assets at year end:

   

Identifiable assets at year end

   

Fuel Specialties

  $216.7  $221.8    $247.9  $216.7  

Active Chemicals

   124.2   121.0     104.2   124.2  

Octane Additives

   206.8   224.2     124.6   206.8  

Corporate

   3.4   2.0     17.6   3.4  
  


 


   


 


 
  $551.1  $569.0    $494.3  $551.1  
  


 


   


 


 

 

The Company includes within the corporate costs line item the costs of:

 

managing the Group as a company with securities listed on the NASDAQ and registered with the SEC;

 

the President/CEO’s office, group finance, group human resources, corporate secretary, legal fees and investor relations;

 

running the corporate offices in the U.S. and Europe;

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

the corporate development function since they do not relate to the current trading activities of our other business segments; and

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

the corporate share of the information technology, accounting and human resources departments.

 

Sales by geographic area are reported by source (where the transaction originates) and by destination (where the final sale to customers is made). Intercompany sales are priced to recover cost plus an appropriate mark-up for profit and are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Identifiable assets are those directly associated with the operations of the geographical area.

 

Goodwill has not been allocated by geographical location on the grounds that it would be impracticable to do so.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

  2006

 

Net sales by source

             

United States

  $222.9  $192.8  $167.1 

United Kingdom

   383.2   333.6   307.6 

Rest of Europe

   115.6   154.6   144.9 

Other

   0.8   0.4   2.1 

Sales between areas

   (82.0)  (79.0)  (89.6)
   


 


 


   $640.5  $602.4  $532.1 
   


 


 


Net sales by destination

             

United States

  $236.6  $210.9  $173.7 

United Kingdom

   22.2   25.1   22.8 

Rest of Europe

   240.5   205.1   189.0 

Other

   141.2   161.3   146.6 
   


 


 


   $640.5  $602.4  $532.1 
   


 


 


Income before income taxes

             

United States

  $10.0  $22.1  $38.8 

United Kingdom

   7.8   25.7   13.7 

Rest of Europe

   4.5   13.3   17.4 

Other

   0.2   (1.3)  (1.4)

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   (3.7)  (12.1)  (36.7)
   


 


 


   $18.8  $47.7  $31.8 
   


 


 


Long-lived assets at year end

             

United States

  $9.4  $8.9     

United Kingdom

   33.9   45.9     

Rest of Europe

   10.2   11.4     
   


 


    
   $53.5  $66.2     
   


 


    

Identifiable assets at year end

             

United States

  $111.7  $82.1     

United Kingdom

   183.4   227.5     

Rest of Europe

   50.4   89.2     

Other

   0.6   0.5     

Goodwill

   148.2   151.8     
   


 


    
   $494.3  $551.1     
   


 


    

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

  2005

 

Net sales by source:

             

United States

  $192.8  $167.1  $135.5 

United Kingdom

   333.6   307.6   285.5 

Rest of Europe

   154.6   144.9   223.2 

Other

   0.4   2.1   17.3 

Sales between areas

   (79.0)  (89.6)  (96.7)
   


 


 


   $602.4  $532.1  $564.8 
   


 


 


Net sales by destination:

             

United States

  $210.9  $173.7  $126.9 

United Kingdom

   25.1   22.8   24.2 

Rest of Europe

   205.1   189.0   172.7 

Other

   161.3   146.6   241.0 
   


 


 


   $602.4  $532.1  $564.8 
   


 


 


Income/(loss) before income taxes:

             

United States

  $22.1  $38.8  $92.4 

United Kingdom

   25.7   13.7   51.6 

Rest of Europe

   13.3   17.4   (126.1)

Other

   (1.3)  (1.4)  (1.6)

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

   (12.1)  (36.7)  (134.4)
   


 


 


   $47.7  $31.8  $(118.1)
   


 


 


Long-lived assets at year end:

             

United States

  $21.4  $23.7     

United Kingdom

   100.0   56.8     

Rest of Europe

   21.8   19.4     

Goodwill

   151.8   163.8     
   


 


    
   $295.0  $263.7     
   


 


    

Identifiable assets at year end:

             

United States

  $82.1  $102.7     

United Kingdom

   227.5   216.2     

Rest of Europe

   89.2   84.7     

Other

   0.5   1.6     

Goodwill

   151.8   163.8     
   


 


    
   $551.1  $569.0     
   


 


    

Note 4.    Share Based Compensation Plans

The Company has five stock option plans, four of which expired by their respective terms in May 2008 at the end of their 10 year life. The Company submitted new plans for stockholder approval to replace those that expired and requested approval to reserve common stock for issuance under each of those plans. Two of these plans provide for the grant of stock options

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 4.     Stock Option Plans

On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split.

The Company has five active stock option plans, three of which provide for grants of options to key employees and one provides for the grant of stock options to non-employee directors. One otherThe fourth plan is a savings plan which provides stock options on an equal basis to all United Kingdom employees, and another providesfor the grant of stock options to all Company employees. The current limit for the number of shares ofemployees provided they commit to make regular savings over a pre-defined period which can then be used to purchase common stock which can be issued or awarded underupon vesting of the options. Under the new plans is 6,086,000. Thevesting periods range from 27 months to 6 years and in all cases stock options issued have a vesting period of three to six years andgranted expire within ten10 years of the date of grant. All grants are at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors which administers the plans.Directors. Grants may be priced at market value or at a premium or discount. The fifth plan provides for the grant of stock options to key executives on a matching basis provided they use a proportion of their annual bonus to purchase common stock in the Company on the open market. All four of the plans submitted for stockholder approval were approved at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 6, 2008. The aggregate number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance which can be granted under all five plans is 1,790,000.

Under the rules of the plans which expired in May 2008 no further stock options will be granted and un-awarded shares of common stock previously allocated to these plans cannot be used for further grants. Stock options granted under the plans prior to the expiration date of the plan expire within 10 years of the date of grant.

 

On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted FAS 123R,Share-Based Payment. FAS 123R requires a company to estimate the number of forfeitures expected to occur and record expense based upon the number of awards expected to vest. Prior to adoption, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred as permitted under previous accounting standards. The cumulative effect of adopting the change in estimating forfeitures was not material to the Company’s financial statements for year ended December 31, 2006.

 

The fair value of these options is calculated using the Black-Scholes model. In some cases certain performance related options are dependent upon external factors such as the Company’s share price. The fair value of these options is calculated using a Monte Carlo model.

 

The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of options calculated using the Black-Scholes model:

 

  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

 2007

 2006

 

Dividend yield

  0.3% 0.4% 0.4%  0.5% 0.3% 0.4%

Expected life

  4 years  4 years  4 years   4 years  4 years  4 years 

Volatility

  48.9% 43.5% 43.0%  50.1% 48.9% 43.5%

Risk free interest rate

  4.47% 4.26% 4.26%  2.73% 4.47% 4.26%

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table summarizes the transactions of the Company’s stock option plans for the three yearsyear ended December 31, 2007:2008:

 

  Number of
Shares


 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price


  Weighted
Average Fair
Value


  Number of
Shares


 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price


  Weighted
Average
Fair
Value


Options outstanding at December 31, 2004

  2,010,556  $5.14   

Options outstanding at January 1, 2008

  1,104,893  $3.56   

Granted – at discount

  282,794  $5.78  $4.82  178,923  $—    $14.46

– at market value

  188,120  $9.89  $5.26  66,472  $20.29  $7.81

Exercised

  (261,404) $4.51     (349,830) $5.28   

Forfeitures

  (105,016) $2.29     (15,160) $—     

Expired

  (198,954) $2.72     (1,717) $13.23   
  

      

    

Options outstanding at December 31, 2005

  1,916,096  $5.05   

Granted – at discount

  162,164  $—    $7.37

– at market value

  55,242  $10.51  $3.92

Exercised

  (384,338) $6.37   

Forfeitures

  (85,014) $2.78   

Expired

  (50,776) $6.26   

Options outstanding at December 31, 2008

  983,581  $3.47   
  

      

    

Options outstanding at December 31, 2006

  1,613,374  $4.48   

Granted – at discount

  387,236  $—    $26.49

– at market value

  28,368  $27.09  $10.96

Exercised

  (783,637) $5.03   

Forfeitures

  (130,269) $0.15   

Expired

  (10,179) $7.61   
  

    

Options outstanding at December 31, 2007

  1,104,893  $3.56   
  

    

 

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at December 31, 2007:2008:

 

Range of Exercise

Price


  Number
Outstanding at

December 31,
2007


  Weighted
Average
Remaining Life


  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price


  Number
Exercisable at

December 31,
2007


  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price


  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life in
Years


  Number
Outstanding at

December 31,
2008


  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life in
Years


  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price


  Number
Exercisable
and Fully
Vested at

December 31,
2008


  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life in
Years


  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price


$0-$5

  717,421  6.68  $0.24  113,500  $1.51  4.27  746,781  6.72  $0.14  64,226  3.59  $1.68

$5-$10

  353,206  5.29  $8.29  121,620  $7.17  2.49  140,162  4.09  $8.42  90,410  2.42  $7.57

$10-$15

  5,900  6.37  $11.50  5,900  $11.50  6.37  2,300  5.36  $11.50  2,300  5.36  $11.50

$20-$25

  66,472  9.15  $20.29  —    —    $—  

$25-$30

  28,366  9.15  $27.09  —    $—    —    27,866  8.15  $27.09  —    —    $—  
  
        
        
        
      
  1,104,893        241,020        983,581        156,936      
  
        
        
        
      

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of fully vested stock options is $0.6$0.4 million. Of the 241,020156,936 stock options that are exercisable, 67,44230,460 have performance conditions attached. The total compensation cost for 2008 and 2007 and 2006 was $3.3$4.1 million and $1.6$3.3 million, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested stock options not yet recognized at December 31, 20072008 is $7.8$6.2 million and this cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 1.532.46 years.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

We have not modified any stock option awards in 2008, 2007 2006 or 2005.2006. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in 2008 and 2007 and 2006 was $1.9$1.3 million and $0.9$1.9 million, respectively. The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock option awards in 2008, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 was $1.8 million, $4.1 million $3.0 million and $1.4$3.0 million, respectively. The Company’s policy is to issue shares from Treasury stock to holders of stock options who exercise those options. During 20072008 and 20062007 the new total fair value of shares vested was $2.2$1.2 million and $0.9$2.2 million, respectively.

 

The Company adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method beginning January 1, 2006. The Company previously recorded a charge for stocktotal options based on the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”). The following table summarizes the effect on net income and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005 if the Company had adopted FAS 123R. As of January 1,vested in 2008 were 264,588 (2007 – 328,660, 2006 compensation expense has been recorded within the consolidated financial statements and calculated consistently with the method prescribed in FAS 123R:– 276,584).

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(in millions, except per share data)


  Net income

  Basic

  Diluted

 

2005

             

As disclosed

  $(123.7) $(5.00) $(5.00)

Compensation expense, net of tax, included in net income

   0.9         

Compensation expense, net of tax, that would have been included had FAS 123 been adopted

   (1.5)        
   


        

Proforma net income

  $(124.3) $(5.03) $(5.03)
   


        

An additional long term incentive plan designed to reward selected executives for delivering exceptional performance was recommended by the Compensation Committee, working with its advisors, and approved by the Board of Directors. Under this plan a discretionary bonus will be payable to eligible executives if the Innospec share performance out-performs that of competitors, as measured by the Russell 2000 Index, by a minimum of 10% over the three years from January 2008 to December 2010. The amount of bonus which can be earned will be a set cash amount for each one percentage point of out-performance. The maximum bonus under this plan, of $12 million in respect of the current participants, will be payable for an out-performance versus the Russell 2000 Index of 30%. No bonus is payable under this plan if the Innospec share price does not out-perform the Russell 2000 Index by more than 10% over the three year period. The fair value of these liability cash-settled stock appreciation rights is calculated on a quarterly basis using a Monte Carlo model. A corresponding compensation charge and liability of $0.1 million was recognized in 2008.

The following assumptions were used in the Monte Carlo model:

   2008

  2007

  2006

 

Dividend yield

  1.7% 0.3% 0.4%

Volatility

  80.2% 48.9% 43.5%

Risk free interest rate

  1.00% 4.47% 4.26%

 

Note 5.     Earnings Per Share

On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The following footnote has been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of options that are dilutive and outstanding during the period. Per share amounts are computed as follows:

 

   2007

  2006

  2005

 

Numerator (in millions):

             

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

  $29.5  $11.4  $(122.3)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   —     —     (1.4)
   

  

  


Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders

  $29.5  $11.4  $(123.7)
   

  

  


Denominator (in thousands):

             

Weighted average common shares outstanding

   23,920   24,141   24,737 

Dilutive effect of stock options and awards

   918   1,198   —   
   

  

  


Denominator for diluted earnings per share

   24,838   25,339   24,737 
   

  

  


Net income per share:

             

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

  $1.23  $0.47  $(4.94)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   —     —     (0.06)
   

  

  


Net income/(loss) available to common shares

  $1.23  $0.47  $(5.00)
   

  

  


Net income per share, diluted:

             

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

  $1.19  $0.45  $(4.94)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   —     —     (0.06)
   

  

  


Net income/(loss) available to common shares

  $1.19  $0.45  $(5.00)
   

  

  


   2008

  2007

  2006

Numerator (in millions):

            

Net income available to common stockholders

  $12.5  $29.5  $11.4
   

  

  

Denominator (in thousands):

            

Weighted average common shares outstanding

   23,595   23,920   24,141

Dilutive effect of stock options and awards

   796   918   1,198
   

  

  

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

   24,391   24,838   25,339
   

  

  

Net income per share, basic:

            

Net income available to common shares

  $0.53  $1.23  $0.47
   

  

  

Net income per share, diluted:

            

Net income available to common shares

  $0.51  $1.19  $0.45
   

  

  

 

In 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 the average number of anti-dilutive options excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share were 98,880, 17,729 and 4,125, and 127,718, respectively.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 6.     Pension Plans

 

The Company maintainsCompany’s principal pension arrangement is a contributory defined benefit pension plan (“the Plan”) covering a number of its current and former employees in the United Kingdom employees (the “Plan”).though it does also have other much smaller pension arrangements in the United Kingdom and overseas. The Plan is closed to new entrants without trustee discretion. The Projected Benefit Obligation (“PBO”) is based on final salary and years of credited service reduced by social security benefits according to a plan formula. Normal retirement age is 65 but provisions are made for early retirement. The Plan’s assets are invested by two investment management companies in funds holding United Kingdom and overseas equities, United Kingdom and overseas fixed interest securities, index linked securities, property unit trusts and cash or cash equivalents.

 

The Company is contributing amounts to the Plan to cover service costs to date. Employee and employer contributions from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2007 were at 5% and 22.6%, respectively, of pensionable pay. From January 1, 2007, employee and employer contributions were at 7% and 29%, respectively. In addition, since March 2007, the Company has been contributing $3£1.5 million per calendar year in accordance with a 10 year deficit recovery plan. From January 1, 2008, employee and employer contributions remained at 7% and 29% though employee contributions were paid by the employer through a salary sacrifice arrangement. The Plan’s assets are invested by two investment management companies in funds holding United Kingdom and overseas equities, United Kingdom and overseas fixed interest securities, index linked securities, property unit trusts and cash or cash equivalents. estimated level of Company contributions into the Plan for 2009 is $5.8 million.

A full tri-annual actuarial valuation of the Plan was performed as at December 31, 2005 and an update performed as at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the results of both of which are reflected in these consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2008 the calculations below.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)underlying plan asset value and PBO were $557.4 million and $571.2 million, respectively, resulting in a deficit of $13.8 million. A full tri-annual actuarial valuation of the Plan as at December 31, 2008 will be performed in 2009. The results of this valuation will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2009.

 

Effective for fiscal year 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. FAS 158 requires that the funded status of defined-benefit postretirement plans be recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and certain changes in the funded status be reflected in comprehensive income. FAS 158 also requires the measurement date of the Plan’s funded status to be the same as the Company’s fiscal year-end. Although the measurement date provision was not required to be adopted until fiscal year 2008 the Company early-adopted this provision for fiscal year 2006. The effect of applying FAS 158 was to record a total reduction to equity through recognition in other comprehensive loss of $97.0 million on an after-tax basis.

 

The Company had previously used a measurement date of October 5. Accordingly, accounting and disclosure for the Plan had been as at and for the 12 months ending October 5. In

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

accordance with FAS 158 the net pension charge of $1.5 million for the transition period of three months to December 31, 2006 has been included in the total reduction to equity of $97.0 million and disclosures for 2005 and 2004 have not been modified from those previously reported.million.

 

(in millions)


  12 months to
December 31
2007


  3 months to
December 31
2006


  12 months to
October 5
2006


  12 months to
October 5
2005


 

Plan net pension charge:

                 

Service cost

  $5.4  $1.3  $5.0  $6.0 

Interest cost on PBO

   45.7   10.5   39.7   39.9 

Expected return on plan assets

   (48.5)  (11.2)  (44.7)  (45.3)

Amortization of net actuarial losses

   2.0   0.9   —     1.1 
   


 


 


 


   $4.6  $1.5  $—    $1.7 
   


 


 


 


Plan assumptions:

                 

Discount rate

   5.80%  5.10%  5.00%  5.00%

Rate of increase in compensation levels

   3.95%  3.55%  3.55%  3.60%

Rate of return on plan assets – overall

   5.45%  5.25%  5.30%  5.30%

Rate of return on plan assets – equity securities

   7.50%  7.60%  8.50%  9.00%

Rate of return on plan assets – debt securities

   4.60%  4.60%  4.60%  5.10%

Plan asset allocation by category:

                 

Equity securities

   29%  32%  29%  32%

Debt securities

   71%  67%  70%  67%

Other

   —     1%  1%  1%
   


 


 


 


    100%  100%  100%  100%
   


 


 


 


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(in millions)


  12 months to
December 31
2008


  12 months to
December 31
2007


  3 months to
December 31
2006


  12 months to
October 5
2006


 

Plan net pension charge:

                 

Service cost

  $5.3  $5.4  $1.3  $5.0 

Interest cost on PBO

   45.7   45.7   10.5   39.7 

Expected return on plan assets

   (48.7)  (48.5)  (11.2)  (44.7)

Amortization of net actuarial losses

   —     2.0   0.9   —   
   


 


 


 


   $2.3  $4.6  $1.5  $—   
   


 


 


 


Plan assumptions:

                 

Discount rate

   6.50%  5.80%  5.10%  5.00%

Rate of increase in compensation levels

   3.75%  3.95%  3.55%  3.55%

Rate of return on plan assets – overall

   6.20%  5.45%  5.25%  5.30%

Rate of return on plan assets – equity securities

   7.80%  7.50%  7.60%  8.50%

Rate of return on plan assets – debt securities

   5.10%  4.60%  4.60%  4.60%

Plan asset allocation by category:

                 

Equity securities

   22%  29%  32%  29%

Debt securities

   76%  71%  67%  70%

Other

   2%  —     1%  1%
   


 


 


 


    100%  100%  100%  100%
   


 


 


 


 

The discount rate used represents the annualized yield on medium and longer term AA rated corporate bonds in the United Kingdom and has been determined by reference to the iBoxx corporate bond index published by International Index Company. The rate of increase in compensation levels assumes that real salary growth in Innospec will be restricted to 0.75% above an assumed level of price inflation of 3.2%3.0%. A 0.25% change in either the discount rate assumption, or level of price inflation assumption, would change the PBO by approximately $30$19 million and the net pension charge for 20082009 by approximately $0.2$1.4 million.

 

The current investment strategy of the Plan is to obtain an asset allocation of 70% in favor of debt securities and 30% equity securities in order to achieve a more predictable return on assets.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The projected net pension charge for the year ending December 31, 20082009 is as follows:

 

(in millions)


    

Service cost

  $5.63.5 

Interest cost on PBO

   48.835.9 

Expected return on plan assets

   (52.033.5)
   


   $2.45.9 
   


 

The estimated level of Company contributions into the Plan for 2008 is $8.9 million. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service as appropriate, are expected to be made:

 

(in millions)


      

2008

  $52.1

2009

  $53.7  $36.5

2010

  $55.5  $37.7

2011

  $57.2  $38.8

2012

  $59.0  $40.0

2013 – 2017

  $324.0

2013

  $41.1

2014 – 2018

  $224.6

 

Company contributions to defined contribution schemes during 20072008 were $0.9$2.8 million (2006(2007 – $1.7$3.0 million).

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Movements in PBO and fair value of Plan assets are as follows:

 

(in millions)


  12 months to
December 31
2007


  3 months to
December 31
2006


  12 months to
October 5
2006


 

Change in PBO

             

Opening balance

  $897.9  $909.5  $725.2 

Interest cost

   45.7   10.5   39.7 

Service cost

   5.4   1.3   5.0 

Contributions by participants

   1.0   0.2   0.7 

Benefits paid

   (51.1)  (11.2)  (43.5)

Actuarial (gains)/losses

   (58.5)  (11.6)  38.7 

Exchange effect

   13.9   (0.8)  143.7 
   


 


 


Closing balance

   854.3   897.9   909.5 
   


 


 


Fair value of plan assets

             

Opening balance

   875.4   872.9   710.7 

Actual benefits paid

   (51.1)  (11.2)  (43.5)

Actual contributions by employer

   7.6   0.7   4.4 

Actual contributions by participants

   1.0   0.2   0.7 

Actual return on assets

   43.1   12.7   56.2 

Exchange effect

   13.1   0.1   144.4 
   


 


 


Closing balance

   889.1   875.4   872.9 
   


 


 


Plan assets excess/(deficit) over PBO

   34.8   (22.5)  (36.6)

Unrecognized net loss

   83.5   138.5   179.6 

Amortization of net actuarial losses

   (2.0)  —     —   

Amount recognized in other comprehensive loss

   (81.5)  (138.5)  —   
   


 


 


Pension asset/(liability)

  $34.8  $(22.5) $143.0 
   


 


 


The underlying PBO and fair value of Plan assets are denominated in sterling and were previously translated at historic exchange rates. On adoption of FAS 158 at December 31, 2006, the underlying PBO and fair value of Plan assets were translated at the 2006 year end exchange rate. At December 31, 2007, the underlying PBO and fair value of Plan assets were translated at the 2007 year end exchange rate.

(in millions)


  12 months to
December 31
2008


  12 months to
December 31
2007


 

Change in PBO

         

Opening balance

  $854.3  $ 897.9 

Interest cost

   45.7   45.7 

Service cost

   5.3   5.4 

Contributions by participants

   —     1.0 

Benefits paid

   (46.1)  (51.1)

Actuarial (gains)/losses

   (66.3)  (58.5)

Exchange effect

   (221.7)  13.9 
   


 


Closing balance

   571.2   854.3 
   


 


Fair value of plan assets

         

Opening balance

   889.1   875.4 

Actual benefits paid

   (46.1)  (51.1)

Actual contributions by employer

   7.5   7.6 

Actual contributions by participants

   —     1.0 

Actual return on assets

   (74.0)  43.1 

Exchange effect

   (219.1)  13.1 
   


 


Closing balance

   557.4   889.1 
   


 


Plan assets excess/(deficit) over PBO

   (13.8)  34.8 

Unrecognized net loss

   124.3   83.5 

Amortization of net actuarial losses

   —     (2.0)

Amount recognized in other comprehensive loss

   (124.3)  (81.5)
   


 


Pension asset/(liability)

  $(13.8) $34.8 
   


 


 

The accumulated benefit obligation for the Plan was $826.3$555.9 million and $871.7$826.3 million at December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.

 

Note 7.    Income Taxes

 

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

On adoption of FIN 48 the Company recognized an increase in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $3.1 million which was accounted for as an adjustment to opening retained earnings; and reclassifications of $21.0 million from other liabilities, $3.8 million from deferred income taxes and $7.8 million from accrued income taxes. A roll-forward of unrecognized tax benefits and associated accrued interest and penalties is as follows:

 

(in millions)


  Interest and
penalties


 Unrecognized
tax benefits


 Total

   Interest and
penalties


 Unrecognized
tax benefits


 Total

 

Opening balance at January 1, 2007

  $2.3  $33.4  $35.7   $2.3  $33.4  $35.7 

Additions related to tax positions taken in the current period

   —     1.5   1.5    —     1.5   1.5 

Additions for tax positions of prior periods

   1.4   1.0   2.4    1.4   1.0   2.4 

Exchange effect

   0.1   1.7   1.8    0.1   1.7   1.8 

Settlements

   —     (1.4)  (1.4)   —     (1.4)  (1.4)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Closing balance at December 31, 2007

   3.8   36.2   40.0    3.8   36.2   40.0 

Current

   (1.7)  (10.9)  (12.6)   (1.7)  (10.9)  (12.6)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Non-current

  $2.1  $25.3  $27.4   $2.1  $25.3  $27.4 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Opening balance at January 1, 2008

  $3.8  $36.2  $40.0 

Additions related to tax positions taken in the current period

   —     2.2   2.2 

Additions for tax positions of prior periods

   0.7   11.6   12.3 

Reductions for tax positions of prior periods

   —     (9.5)  (9.5)

Exchange effect

   (0.5)  (5.7)  (6.2)

Settlements

   (0.5)  (3.5)  (4.0)
  


 


 


Closing balance at December 31, 2008

   3.5   31.3   34.8 

Current

   (1.7)  (7.5)  (9.2)
  


 


 


Non-current

  $1.8  $23.8  $25.6 
  


 


 


 

All of the $40.0$34.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact our effective tax rate if recognized.

 

We recognize accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income taxes in our consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2007, $3.8 million was accrued within the liability for unrecognized tax benefits in respect of accrued interest and penalties.

 

The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As at December 31, 2007,2008, the Company’s subsidiaries in France, Germany and the United Kingdom are subject to tax authority investigations into their respective transfer pricing policies. The Company does not anticipate that adjustments arising out of these investigations would result in a material change to its financial position as at December 31, 2007.2008.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company and its U.S. subsidiaries remain open to examination by the IRS for years 1998 onwards due to the net operating losses in the period 1998 to 2002, although no examination is currently underway. The Company’s subsidiaries in other major tax jurisdictions are open to examination including France (2004(2005 onwards), Germany (2002 onwards), Switzerland (2005(2007 onwards) and the United Kingdom (2002 onwards). We are currently under examination in various foreign jurisdictions.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The sources of income/(loss)income before income taxes were as follows:

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

  2005

   2008

  2007

  2006

Domestic

  $22.2  $20.2  $1.7 

Domestic (U.S.)

  $10.0  $22.2  $20.2

Foreign

   25.5   11.6   (119.8)   8.8   25.5   11.6
  

  

  


  

  

  

  $47.7  $31.8  $(118.1)  $18.8  $47.7  $31.8
  

  

  


  

  

  

 

The components of income tax charges are summarized as follows:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

 2007

 2006

 

Current:

      

Federal

  $16.9  $5.9  $0.2   $5.6  $16.9  $5.9 

Foreign

   7.7   15.5   (1.8)   1.4   7.7   15.5 
  


 


 


  


 


 


  $24.6  $21.4  $(1.6)  $7.0  $24.6  $21.4 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Deferred:

      

Federal

  $(6.4) $0.5  $—     $4.5  $(6.4) $0.5 

Foreign

   —     (1.5)  5.8    (5.2)  —     (1.5)
  


 


 


  


 


 


   (6.4)  (1.0)  5.8    (0.7)  (6.4)  (1.0)
  


 


 


  


 


 


  $18.2  $20.4  $4.2   $6.3  $18.2  $20.4 
  


 


 


  


 


 


 

Cash payments/(receipts) for income taxes were $24.6 million, $22.7 million and $(0.7) million during 2008, 2007 and $21.4 million during 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate because of the factors indicated below:

 

   2007

  2006

  2005

 

Statutory rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

Foreign tax rate differential

  (4.6) (5.0) 8.4 

Amortization

  —    (0.4) —   

Foreign tax credit

  (73.9) (29.5) —   

Dividend inclusion

  80.0  47.1  —   

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

  8.9  40.4  (39.9)

Unrecognized net operating losses

  (2.1) (31.6) 2.6 

Tax (credit)/charge from previous years

  (14.6) 4.2  3.0 

Discontinued operations

  —    —    (0.6)

Investment write-off

  —    —    (3.8)

Other (net)

  9.5  4.0  (8.2)
   

 

 

   38.2% 64.2% (3.5)%
   

 

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2008

  2007

  2006

 

Statutory rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

Foreign income inclusion

  47.6  5.6  —   

Impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill

  7.1  8.9  40.4 

Foreign tax credit

  (21.3) (73.9) (29.5)

FAS 158/87 pension charge

  (18.2) (1.0) (6.2)

Foreign tax rate differential

  (15.2) (4.6) (5.0)

Unrecognized net operating losses

  (10.0) (2.1) (31.6)

Permanent tax adjustments

  (8.9) 9.8  7.3 

Amortization

  (4.2) —    (0.4)

Tax (credit)/charge from previous years

  22.0  (14.6) 4.2 

Dividend inclusion

  —    80.0  47.1 

Other items and adjustments (net)

  (0.4) (4.9) 2.9 
   

 

 

   33.5% 38.2% 64.2%
   

 

 

 

Significant factors affecting the variation to the statutory rate include the use of tax losses for which no deferred tax asset was recognized and foreign income inclusion net of foreign tax credits. The $12.1$3.7 million charge in respect of the impairment of Octane Additives business goodwill has no cash or taxation impact and represents a significantfurther factor in the variation from the U.S. federal statutory rate. Other significant factors affecting the variation to the statutory rate is a deemed liquidation of a group subsidiary, treated as a dividend under U.S. tax rules, net of foreign tax credits, the use of tax losses for which no deferred tax asset had been recognized and tax credits from prior years. The mix of taxable profits generated in the different geographical localities in which the Group operates had a positive impact on the effective tax rate in 2007.2008 partially offset by foreign income inclusions.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

   2008

 2007

 

Deferred tax assets:

      

Excess of tax over book basis in property, plant and equipment

  $3.8  $3.3   $2.9  $3.8 

Net operating loss carry forwards

   3.6   1.8    2.6   3.6 

Pension liability

   —     6.8    4.1   —   

Goodwill amortization

   2.9   —      —     2.9 

Foreign tax credits

   6.5   —      5.4   6.5 

Other

   4.2   2.7    10.0   4.2 
  


 


  


 


   21.0   14.6    25.0   21.0 

Valuation allowance

   (8.8)  (1.0)   (7.3)  (8.8)
  


 


  


 


Total deferred tax assets

   12.2   13.6    17.7   12.2 
  


 


  


 


Deferred tax liabilities:

      

Pension asset

   (9.7)  —      —     (9.7)

Intangible assets

   (5.9)  (6.9)   (5.2)  (5.9)

Other

   (4.0)  (5.1)   (1.9)  (4.0)

Goodwill amortization

   (3.4)  —   
  


 


  


 


   (19.6)  (12.0)   (10.5)  (19.6)
  


 


  


 


Total net deferred (liability)/asset

  $(7.4) $1.6 

Total net deferred asset/(liability)

  $7.2  $(7.4)
  


 


  


 


Details of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance are as follows:

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

 

At January 1

  $(8.8) $(1.0)

Change in foreign tax credits

   1.1   (6.5)

Change in net operating loss carry forwards

   0.4   (1.3)
   


 


At December 31

  $(7.3) $(8.8)
   


 


 

As a result of the Company’s assessment of its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007,2008, the Company considers it more likely than not that no valuation allowance is required for $1.3$0.7 million (2006 - $0.8(2007 – $1.3 million) of its net operating loss carry forwards and that a full valuation allowance is required against its foreign tax credits carry forwards. The net operating loss carry forwards arose in 20072008 and were generated in SwitzerlandGermany as a result of exceptional losses on a contract.in the year. It is expected that sufficient taxable profits will be generated against which thethese net operating loss carry forwards can be relieved and there is no time limitation to use these losses. Should it be determined in the future that it is no longer more likely than not that these assets will be realized an additional valuation allowance would be required and the Company’s operating results would be adversely affected during the period in which such a determination would be made.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company has not made provision for deferred tax on unremitted earnings from overseas subsidiaries on the grounds that they will not be remitted as they are required in the entities concerned or will continue to be used to fund further investment into other territories. The amount of unremitted

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

earnings at December 31, 20072008 and 20062007 was approximately $805$691 million and $710$805 million, respectively. Any determination of the potential amount of unrecognized deferred taxes is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.

 

Note 8.    Acquisitions

On January 14, 2005, the Company acquired a 100% interest in Finetex, Inc. (“Finetex”) for consideration of $21.2 million. The Company purchased 234 common shares which were valued at $17.4 million. The balance of the funds was used to separately acquire the two properties on which the business operates and to pay costs of the acquisition.

Finetex is a manufacturer and supplier of specialty surfactants and emollients to the personal care, cosmetics and other industrial markets. The results of Finetex have been consolidated since the acquisition date and have been reported in the Active Chemicals business segment. In 2005, since its acquisition by the Company, Finetex contributed $18.4 million of net sales and a net profit of $0.2 million to the consolidated net loss ($0.01 profit per basic share). During the third quarter of 2005 the inventory standard costing process at Finetex was updated. This led to an increase of $0.5 million in the fair value of inventory acquired and a corresponding reduction in goodwill. The following values have been assigned to the major classes of assets and liabilities in the balance sheets of the acquired entities at acquisition date:

(in millions)


    

Cash

  $0.2 

Receivables

   2.3 

Inventories

   4.0 

Prepayments

   0.1 

Property, plant and equipment

   7.3 

Goodwill

   3.6 

Intangible assets

   7.1 
   


Total assets

   24.6 
   


Current liabilities

   (0.8)

Deferred taxes

   (2.4)

Other non-current liabilities

   (0.2)
   


Total liabilities

   (3.4)
   


Net assets acquired

  $21.2 
   


The goodwill recognized in respect of Finetex has been included within the Active Chemicals business segment (see Note 9).

The following intangible assets were recognized in respect of Finetex.

(in millions)


     Useful Life

Customer relationships

  $4.2  13 years

Patents

   2.9  10 years
   

   

Total assets

  $7.1   
   

   

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Effective January 1, 2007 the businesses of Finetex, Inc. and ProChem Chemicals, Inc. were merged into Innospec Active Chemicals LLC (previously known as Innospec Performance Chemicals U.S. Co.).

Note 9.    Goodwill

 

Goodwill comprises the following:

 

(in millions)


 Fuel
Specialties


 Active
Chemicals


 Octane
Additives


 Total

  Fuel
Specialties


 Active
Chemicals


 Octane
Additives


 Total

 

Gross cost – at January 1, 2006

 $117.1  $30.4  $351.0  $498.5 

Exchange effect

  0.1   —     —     0.1 

Impairment

  —     —     (36.7)  (36.7)
 


 


 


 


Gross cost – at December 31, 2006

  117.2   30.4   314.3   461.9 
 


 


 


 


Amortization – at January 1 and December 31, 2006

  (8.3)  (0.3)  (289.5)  (298.1)
 


 


 


 


Net book amount – at December 31, 2006

 $108.9  $30.1  $24.8  $163.8 
 


 


 


 


Gross cost – at January 1, 2007

  117.2   30.4   314.3   461.9  $117.2  $30.4  $314.3  $461.9 

Exchange effect

  0.1   —     —     0.1   0.1   —     —     0.1 

Impairment

  —     —     (12.1)  (12.1)  ���     —     (12.1)  (12.1)
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Gross cost – at December 31, 2007

  117.3   30.4   302.2   449.9   117.3   30.4   302.2   449.9 
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Amortization – at January 1 and December 31, 2007

  (8.3)  (0.3)  (289.5)  (298.1)

Accumulated amortization – at January 1 and December 31, 2007

  (8.3)  (0.3)  (289.5)  (298.1)
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Net book amount – at December 31, 2007

 $109.0  $30.1  $12.7  $151.8  $109.0  $30.1  $12.7  $151.8 
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Gross cost – at January 1, 2008

  117.3   30.4   302.2   449.9 

Exchange effect

  0.1   —     —     0.1 

Impairment

  —     —     (3.7)  (3.7)
 


 


 


 


Gross cost – at December 31, 2008

  117.4   30.4   298.5   446.3 
 


 


 


 


Accumulated amortization – at January 1 and December 31, 2008

  (8.3)  (0.3)  (289.5)  (298.1)
 


 


 


 


Net book amount – at December 31, 2008

 $109.1  $30.1  $9.0  $148.2 
 


 


 


 


 

The Company’s reporting units are generally consistent with the operating segments underlying the segments identified in Note 3.

 

The Company adopted FAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002. This requires that goodwill deemed to have an indefinite life should no longer be amortized, but subject to an annual impairment review, or between years if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that an impairment may have occurred.

 

Due to the continuing decline in the world market for Octane Additives, goodwill in respect of the Octane Additives business segment is reviewed for impairment on a quarterly basis.

The Company has elected to perform its annual tests in respect of Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals goodwill as of December 31 each year.

In reviewing for any impairment charge the fair value of the impaired reporting units underlying the segments is estimated using an after tax cash flow methodology based on management’s best estimates at that time. At December 31, 2008 we had $139.2 million of goodwill relating to our Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

businesses. At this date we performed annual impairment reviews and concluded that there has been no impairment of goodwill in respect of those reporting segments.

In light of the continuing decline in the Octane Additives market globally, as the Company makes sales of Octane Additives in each quarter, the remaining sales and corresponding cash flows that can be derived from the Octane Additives business are reduced, and accordingly the fair value of the Octane Additives reporting unit is reduced. As a result the Company determined that quarterly impairment reviews be performed from January 1, 2004 and any impairment charge arising be recognized in the relevant quarter. As a result of the Octane Additives impairment reviews performed during 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 impairment charges of $3.7 million, $12.1 million $36.7 million and $134.4$36.7 million, respectively, were recognized. These charges are non-cash in nature and have no impact on taxation. There is $12.7$9.0 million of goodwill remaining at December 31, 2008 which relates to the Octane Additives business. Given the quantum and predictability of the remaining future cash flows from the Octane Additives business the Company expects goodwill impairment charges to be recognized in the income statement on an approximate straight-line basis over the three years endingto December 31, 2010.2012. Effective October 1, 2008 the Company extended its estimate for the future life of the Octane Additives business from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2012.

 

AtWe believe that the endassumptions used in our annual and quarterly impairment reviews are reasonable, but that they are judgmental, and that variations in any of the fourth quarterassumptions may result in materially different calculations of 2007impairment charges, if any. At December 31, 2008, the Company performed its annualsum of the fair values of our reporting units was in excess of the Company’s market capitalization (based upon our stock price at the same date) due primarily to an estimated control premium. The control premium reflects the fact that management has access to information, such as future projections, and the power to make investment, financing and resource allocation decisions. Management do not believe that any further goodwill impairment review for goodwill for Fuel Specialties and Active Chemicals and believes that there has been no impairment of goodwillcharges are required to be recognized in addition to those already recognized in respect of thosethe Octane Additives reporting segments.unit.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 10.9.     Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets comprise the following:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

   2008

  2007

Gross cost

         

– Ethyl

  $28.4  $—     $22.1  $28.4

– Veritel

   60.6   60.6    60.6   60.6

– Technology

   7.1   7.1    7.1   7.1

– Customer relationships

   16.0   16.0    16.0   16.0

– Patents

   2.9   2.9    2.9   2.9

– Other

   0.3   0.3    0.3   0.3
  


 


  

  

   115.3   86.9    109.0   115.3
  


 


  

  

Accumulated amortization

   

– Ethyl

   (4.2)  —   

– Veritel

   (60.6)  (50.6)

– Technology

   (2.5)  (1.7)

– Customer relationships

   (5.0)  (3.6)

– Patents

   (0.9)  (0.6)

– Other

   (0.2)  (0.2)
  


 


   (73.4)  (56.7)
  


 


  $41.9  $30.2 
  


 


Accumulated amortization

         

– Ethyl

   (8.9)  (4.2)

– Veritel

   (60.6)  (60.6)

– Technology

   (3.2)  (2.5)

– Customer relationships

   (6.6)  (5.0)

– Patents

   (1.1)  (0.9)

– Other

   (0.3)  (0.2)
   


 


    (80.7)  (73.4)
   


 


   $28.3  $41.9 
   


 


 

Ethyl

 

On October 1, 1998, Innospec entered into sales and marketing agreements (“TMAs”) with Ethyl Corporation (“Ethyl”) to market and sell tetra ethyl lead (“TEL”) in all areasAn intangible asset of the world except North America and the European Economic Area for the period lasting until December 31, 2009, subject to renewal thereafter. This relationship$28.4 million was extended effective January 1, 2000 when two of our Swiss subsidiaries entered into similar TMAs with Ethyl’s

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Swiss subsidiaries. In April 2000, Ethyl made a payment to Innospec of $38.6 million as a prepayment for services to be provided under the Swiss TMAs. Effective July 1, 2001, another of our Swiss subsidiaries entered into a TMA with Veritel Chemicals BV (“Veritel”) and Ethyl agreed to participate in this TMA with the scope of all the TMAs being extended to include the European Economic Area.

No separate legal entity or joint venture was established as a consequence of the TMAs. All marketing and sales effort made under these arrangements were maderecognized in the namesecond quarter of Innospec. Innospec produced all TEL marketed under the TMAs and also provided marketing and other services. Ethyl provided bulk distribution services, marketing and other services. In addition, Ethyl was required to hold approximately one third of the inventories sold under these arrangements or deposit an equivalent dollar amount with Innospec. At March 31, 2007 Ethyl held no TEL inventories in respect of the TMAs and accordingly had deposited $12.0 million with us. The net proceeds under the TMAs were paid to Innospec and Ethyl as compensation for services and based on an agreed-upon formula, with Innospec receiving 68% of the total compensation for services provided and Ethyl receiving 32%. Ethyl’s 32% share of the net proceeds was advanced to Ethyl by us when payment was received from the TMA customers.

Sales and expenses incurred under the TMAs were included within Innospec’s income statement. These comprised all revenues and costs incurred directly by Innospec, together with costs recharged by Ethyl for bulk distribution services, marketing and other services provided under the TMAs. Ethyl’s share of the net proceeds for services was charged within cost of goods sold. The $38.6 million prepayment for TMA services to be provided was treated as deferred income and amortized to the income statement within cost of goods sold. Net proceeds due to Ethyl were held within accounts payable.

Innospec had commenced proceedings in the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”) against Ethyl regarding an alleged breach of duty by Ethyl under the TMAs by actively marketing and selling an alternative product. In addition, the Company was in dispute with Ethyl regarding the price that it was entitled to charge for the supply of TEL to Ethyl in the U.S. under a separate agreement (“U.S. Supply Agreement”). On June 15, 2007, both parties resolved all of the arbitration actions arising out of the disputes under the TMAs and the U.S. Supply Agreement. The TMAs were terminated effective April 1, 2007, and Innospec became the sole supplier of TEL outside of the U.S. On June 27, 2007, Innospec refunded Ethyl’s $12.0 million inventory deposit, advanced Ethyl’s share of net proceeds which had not yet been collected from TMA customers as at the termination date, and made a payment of $28.0 million in respect of Ethyl foregoing their entitlement effective April 1, 2007 to a share of the future income stream under the TMAs effective April 1, 2007.sales and marketing agreements (“TMAs”) to market and sell tetra ethyl lead (“TEL”). In addition,2008 contract provisions no longer deemed necessary of $6.3 million were offset against the $1.9 million unamortized balance at March 31, 2007 of the Ethyl prepayment for services to be provided under the TMAs was written off to cost of goods sold in the income statement. During the course of this settlement we incurred professional fees of $0.4 million.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

An intangible asset has been recognized in respect of the payment to Ethyl, which represented Ethyl foregoing their entitlement to a share of the future income stream under the TMAs effective April 1, 2007, and associated professional fees.asset. The TMAs covered the sale of TEL for use in automotive gasoline and aviation gasoline which we disclose within our Octane Additives business segment and our Fuel Specialties business segment, respectively. We have allocated the individual components of the intangible asset attributable to TEL for use in automotive gasoline and aviation gasoline by reference to the forecast future income streams and associated cash flows from those markets which Ethyl would have shared in. No residual value has beenwas attributed to the intangible asset. Accordingly, commencing April 1, 2007, the amount attributed to the Octane Additives business segment iswas being amortized straight-line to December 31, 2010 and the amount attributed to the Fuel Specialties business segment is being amortized straight-line to December 31, 2017. Effective October 1, 2008 the Company extended its estimate for the future life of the Octane Additives business from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2012 and therefore prospectively adjusted the amortization period for the amount attributed to the Octane Additives business segment. An amortization charge of $4.7 million was recognized in 2008 (2007 – $4.2 million).

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Veritel

 

An intangible asset of $60.6 million was recognized in 2001, and amortized straight-line to December 31, 2007, in relation to amounts payable to Veritel Chemicals BV by our Swiss subsidiary pursuant to a marketing agreement effective July 1, 2001. An initial signing fee of $5.0 million was paid on entering into the agreement. In December 2001, notice was given of a permanent source interruption which triggered further payments due to Veritel of $70.0 million. Under the terms of a separate marketing agreement with Ethyl, $24.5 million was recoverable from Ethyl, and the Company’s share of $50.5 million was capitalized by our Swiss subsidiary. The asset iswas fully amortized as at December 31, 2007.2007 and December 31, 2008. No amortization was recognized in 2008 (2007 – $10.0 million).

 

Technology

 

Following the acquisition of the remaining 50% of Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC (previously known as Octel Starreon LLC) on July 8, 2004, the Company recognized an intangible asset of $2.3 million in respect of various technological approvals the business has received from certain military and civilian authorities. The approvals act as a barrier to entry to any potential competitor in the market who would wish to supply these products.

 

An intangible asset of $4.8 million was recognized in respect of a number of specialized manufacturing processes carried out by Innospec Widnes Limited (previously known as Aroma Fine Chemicals Limited) following the acquisition of that entity in August 2004.

 

Both of these assets have an expected life of ten years and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over this period. No residual value is anticipated.

 

Customer relationships

 

Following the acquisition of Finetex (now merged into Innospec Active Chemicals LLC), the Company recognized an intangible asset totallingtotaling $7.1 million, $4.2 million of which was in relation to customer lists acquired. This asset has an expected life of thirteen years and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over this period. No residual value is anticipated.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Intangible assets were recognized in 2004 in respect of both the Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC (previously known as Octel Starreon LLC) ($9.0 million), and Innospec Widnes Limited (previously known as Aroma Fine Chemicals Limited) ($2.8 million) acquisitions. These relate to ongoing customer relationships. These have an expected life of ten years and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over that period. No residual value is anticipated.

 

Patents

 

Following the acquisition of Finetex (now merged into Innospec Active Chemicals LLC), the Company recognized an intangible asset of $2.9 million in respect of patents and trademarks. These have an expected life of ten years and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over that period.

 

Other

 

The remaining balance relates chiefly to software costs which are amortized over 3 years.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company adopted FAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002. This requires that intangible assets should be subject to an annual impairment review, or between years if events occur or circumstances change which suggest that an impairment may have occurred. The Company has elected to perform its annual tests in respect of its intangible assets as of December 31 each year. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company performed its annual impairment review of intangible assets and believes that no impairment exists.

 

Intangible asset amortization expense was $16.9$7.4 million, $12.7$16.9 million and $12.7 million in 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively.

 

Future amortization expense is estimated to be $8.2$4.7 million per annum for the threefour years to 2010, and then $3.6 million per annum in 2011 and 2012.

 

Note 11.10.     Deferred Finance Costs

 

The Company entered into a three and one half year financingfinance facility on December 13, 2005 (see Note 14).2005. On February 6, 2009 we entered into a new three-year finance facility. This new finance facility replaced the previous Company debtfinance facility which existedwas in place at December 31, 2004. The net book amount of the deferred finance costs which had been capitalized as a result of the refinancing in January 2004, some $1.4 million at the beginning of 2005, was amortized in full during 2005 as a consequence of the refinancing.2008 (see Note 13).

 

In 2008 and 2006, and 2005, $0.5$0.6 million and $2.1$0.5 million of refinancing costs were capitalized, respectively. These were incurred in relation to the refinancing entered into on December 13, 2005. These will be amortized over the expected life of the agreementrelevant finance facility using the effective interest method.

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

 

Gross cost

  $2.6  $2.6 

Accumulated amortization

   (2.1)  (1.0)

Exchange effect

   (0.2)  —   
   


 


   $0.3  $1.6 
   


 


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

 

Gross cost

  $3.1  $2.6 

Accumulated amortization

   (2.6)  (2.1)

Exchange effect

   —     (0.2)
   


 


   $0.5  $0.3 
   


 


 

Amortization expense was $1.1$0.5 million, $1.1 million and $1.3$1.1 million in 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. The charge is included in interest expense (see Note 2).

 

Note 12.11.     Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

   2008

 2007

 

Land

  $8.3  $8.2   $6.8  $8.3 

Buildings

   5.0   4.6    5.0   5.0 

Equipment

   100.3   89.3    97.3   100.3 

Work in progress

   5.8   3.4    4.1   5.8 
  


 


  


 


   119.4   105.5    113.2   119.4 

Less accumulated depreciation

   (53.2)  (39.0)   (59.7)  (53.2)
  


 


  


 


  $66.2  $66.5   $53.5  $66.2 
  


 


  


 


 

Of the total net book value of equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 $nil million (2006 – $0.1 million) isno amounts are in respect of assets held under capital leases. These assets were principally computer hardware in 2006.

 

Depreciation charges were $15.1 million, $13.3 million and $13.6 million in 2008, 2007 and $14.7 million in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

 

The estimated additional cost to complete work in progress is $1.6$1.4 million (2006(2007$3.1$1.6 million).

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 13.12.    Plant Closure Provisions

 

The principal sites giving rise to environmental remediation liabilities are the former Octane Additives manufacturing sites at Paimboeuf in France, Doberitz and Biebesheim in Germany, together with the Ellesmere Port site in the United Kingdom, which is the last ongoing manufacturer of TEL. The liability for estimated closure costs of Innospec’s Octane Additives manufacturing facilities includes costs for personnel reductions (severance), decontamination and environmental remediation activities (remediation) when demand for TEL diminishes. Severance provisions have also been made in relation to the Fuel Specialties and the Active Chemicals businesses.

 

Movements in the provisions are summarized as follows:-

 

   2007

  2007

  2007

  2007

  2006

 

(in millions)


  Severance

  Other
Restructuring


  Remediation

  Total

  Total

 

Total at January 1

  $3.8  $0.3  $23.7  $27.8  $31.1 

Charge for the period

   0.5   2.5   1.3   4.3   6.1 

Expenditure

   (2.0)  (2.2)  (1.7)  (5.9)  (10.2)

Exchange effect

   0.1   —     0.5   0.6   0.8 
   


 


 


 


 


Total at December 31

   2.4   0.6   23.8   26.8   27.8 

Due within one year

   (1.9)  (0.3)  (2.2)  (4.4)  (5.6)
   


 


 


 


 


Balance at December 31

  $0.5  $0.3  $21.6  $22.4  $22.2 
   


 


 


 


 


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(in millions)


  Severance

  Other
Restructuring


  Remediation

  Total

 

Total at January 1, 2007

  $3.8  $0.3  $23.7  $27.8 

Charge for the period

   0.5   2.5   1.3   4.3 

Expenditure

   (2.0)  (2.2)  (1.7)  (5.9)

Exchange effect

   0.1   —     0.5   0.6 
   


 


 


 


Total at December 31, 2007

   2.4   0.6   23.8   26.8 

Due within one year

   (1.9)  (0.3)  (2.2)  (4.4)
   


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2007

  $0.5  $0.3  $21.6  $22.4 
   


 


 


 


Total at January 1, 2008

  $2.4  $0.6  $23.8  $26.8 

Charge for the period

   0.9   1.2   2.8   4.9 

Expenditure

   (1.6)  (1.7)  (1.6)  (4.9)

Exchange effect

   (0.1)  0.1   0.1   0.1 
   


 


 


 


Total at December 31, 2008

   1.6   0.2   25.1   26.9 

Due within one year

   (1.5)  —     (2.6)  (4.1)
   


 


 


 


Balance at December 31, 2008

  $0.1  $0.2  $22.5  $22.8 
   


 


 


 


 

Amounts due within one year refer to provisions where expenditure is expected to arise within one year of the balance sheet date. Severance charges are recognized in the income statement as restructuring costs along with other restructuring costs. Remediation costs are recognized in cost of goods sold.

 

Severance

 

A charge of $0.5$0.9 million was recognized in respect of a reduction in Active Chemicals United Kingdom headcountEMEA ($0.40.7 million) and additional payments in respect of the former CEOAmericas ($0.10.2 million). headcount.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Other Restructuringrestructuring

 

The $2.5$1.2 million charge primarily relates to United Kingdom site clearance ($1.20.6 million), U.S. site clearance ($0.3 million) and relocation of our European Headquarters to the Ellesmere Port site ($0.80.3 million).

 

Remediation

 

Total costs for remediation are evaluated on a regular basis to take account of expenditure incurred and to amend the scope of future activities in the light of findings from projects carried out. A detailed review of the expected future costs of decontamination and remediation at the Ellesmere Port site was concluded in December 2004. The results were summarized in a discounted cash flow model and the results are reflected herein.

 

Remediation expenditure against provisions was $1.6 million, $1.7 million and $1.3 million in 2008, 2007, and $2.2 million in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

 

The remediation provision represents the fair value of the Company’s liability recognized under FAS 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. The accretion expense recognized under FAS 143 in 20072008 was $2.3 million. This charge was offsetincreased in 20072008 by $1.0$0.5 million in respect of a reductionan increase in the scope and cost of future activities to be performed in the light of findings from projects carried out.

 

The Company records environmental liabilities when they are probable and costs can be estimated reasonably. The Company has to anticipate the program of work required and the associated future costs, and has to comply with environmental legislation in the relevant countries. The Company views the costs of vacating our main United Kingdom site as a contingent liability because there is no present intention to exit the site. The Company has further determined that, due to the uncertain product life of TEL, particularly in the market for aviation gas, there exists such uncertainty as to the timing of such cash flows that it is not possible to estimate these flows sufficiently reliably to recognize a provision.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 14.13.     Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

 

Senior term loan

  $75.0  $90.0 

Revolving credit

   6.0   58.0 

Capital leases

   —     0.1 
   


 


    81.0   148.1 

Less current portion

   (20.0)  (15.1)
   


 


   $61.0  $133.0 
   


 


Payments of interest on long-term debt were $6.4 million, $9.3 million and $7.6 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The net cash outflow in respect of refinancing costs was $nil million, $0.5 million and $2.0 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The financing package agreed in January 2004, and amended in August 2004, comprised a term loan of $100 million and a revolving credit facility of $110 million. The term loan was repayable in annual instalments over three and one half years. The revolving facility was available throughout the loan period until July 2007. There was $119 million outstanding under the terms of this facility at December 31, 2004.

(in millions)


  2008

  2007

 

Senior term loan

  $55.0  $75.0 

Revolving credit

   18.0   6.0 
   


 


    73.0   81.0 

Less current portion

   (73.0)  (20.0)
   


 


   $—    $61.0 
   


 


 

On December 13, 2005 the Company entered into an agreementa finance facility with a syndicate of banks for a new term loan of $100 million, repayable over three and one half years.years, and revolving credit

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

facility of $100 million. Of this term loan $10 million, $15 million and $20 million was repaid on July 31, 2006, January 31, 2007, and January 31, 2008, respectively. A final repayment of $55 million iswas due on June 12, 2009. An additionalThe revolving credit facility was also agreed which willdue to expire on June 12, 2009. This revolving credit2009 when the finance facility was initially $67.1due to expire. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $73.0 million but was then increased by $32.9 million to $100 million on June 12, 2006 when The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and National Australia Bank Limited joined the syndicate of lending banks. There was $81.0 milliondebt outstanding under this finance facility and was in compliance with all financial covenants therein. The facility was secured by a number of fixed and floating charges over certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. The weighted average rate of interest on borrowings was 5.2% at December 31, 2008 and 5.6% at December 31, 2007.

 

On February 6, 2009 we entered into a new three-year finance facility which provides for borrowings by us of up to $150 million including a term loan of $50 million and revolving credit facility of $100 million. The revolving credit facility can be drawn down until the finance facility expires on February 6, 2012. The term loan is repayable as follows: $10 million is due on February 5, 2010; $15 million on February 7, 2011; and $25 million on February 6, 2012. This new finance facility replaced the previous finance facility which was in place at December 31, 2008.

The Company’s new finance facility contains restrictive clauses which may constrain our activities and limit our operational and financial flexibility. The new facility obliges the lenders to comply with a request for utilization of finance unless there is an event of default outstanding. Events of default are defined in the finance facility and include a material adverse change to our business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations. The new facility contains a number of restrictions that limit our ability, amongst other things, and subject to certain limited exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge our assets as security, guarantee obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change our line of business.

In addition, the new facility also contains terms which, if breached, would result in the loan becoming repayable on demand. It requires, among other matters, compliance with two financial covenant ratios. These ratios are (1) the ratio of net debt to EBITDA and (2) the ratio of net interest to EBITA.EBITDA. EBITDA and EBITA areis a non U.S. GAAP measuresmeasure of liquidity defined in the finance facility. In the event that the ratio

Payments of interest on long-term debt were $3.8 million, $6.4 million and $9.3 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The net debt to EBITDA exceeds 2.0 thencash outflow in addition to these covenants, the facility also requires a “look forward” testrespect of refinancing costs was $0.4 million and an additional financial covenant ratio$0.5 million in the form of net operating cash flow before finance costs to scheduled debt amortization2008 and interest costs. This “look forward” test was not applicable to the Company2006, respectively.

No assets held under capital leases were capitalized during 2007 due to such ratio not being exceeded.2008 (2007 – $nil). No capital repayments were made during 2008 (2007 – $0.1 million).

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Management believes that the Company has not breached these covenants throughout 2007. The facility is secured by a number of fixed and floating charges over certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.

No assets held under capital leases were capitalized during 2007 (2006 - $nil). $0.1 million of capital repayments were made during 2007 (2006 - $0.2 million).

The following table presents the projected annual maturities for the next four years after 2007:

(in millions)


  Term
loan


  Revolving
credit
facility


  Total

2008

  $20.0  $ —    $20.0

2009

   55.0   6.0   61.0

2010

   —     —     —  

2011

   —     —     —  
   

  

  

   $75.0  $6.0  $81.0
   

  

  

The weighted average rate of interest on borrowings was 6.5% at December 31, 2007 and 6.6% at December 31, 2006.

Note 15.14.     Deferred Income

 

Movements in deferred income are summarized as follows:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

   2008

 2007

 

Received

  $39.5  $39.1 

Amortized

   (38.6)  (36.2)
  


 


   0.9   2.9 

Deferred income

  $0.9  $0.9 

Less: current portion

   (0.1)  (2.0)   (0.1)  (0.1)
  


 


  


 


  $0.8  $0.9   $0.8  $0.8 
  


 


  


 


 

Deferred income of $38.6 million relates to amounts received from Ethyl relating to a prepayment for services to be provided under the sales and marketing agreements (“TMAs”) with two of our Swiss subsidiaries, effective January 1, 2000. Following the termination of the TMAs effective April 1, 2007 the unamortized balance was written off to cost of goods sold in the income statement (see Note 10).

The remainder relates to $0.7$0.8 million of post acquisition government grants received by Innospec Leuna GmbH and $0.2$0.1 million of government grants and advance rental payments received by Innospec Widnes Limited (previously known as Aroma Fine Chemicals Limited).

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 16.15.     Stockholders’ Equity

 

On June 18, 2007 the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a 2-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Stockholders of record as of July 6, 2007 received one additional share of Innospec Inc. common stock for every share they owned on that date. The shares were distributed on July 20, 2007. Stock option holders received one additional option for every option they held and the original exercise prices for these options were halved to reflect the stock split. The following table has been retrospectively adjusted for this stock split.

  Common Stock

  Treasury Stock

   Common Stock

  Treasury Stock

 

(number of shares in thousands)


  2007

  2006

  2005

  2007

 2006

 2005

   2008

  2007

  2006

  2008

 2007

 2006

 

At January 1

  29,555  29,555  29,555  5,749  4,904  4,879   29,555  29,555  29,555  5,777  5,749  4,904 

Exercise of options

  —    —    —    (786) (405) (269)  —    —    —    (354) (786) (405)

Stock purchases

  —    —    —    814  1,250  294   —    —    —    533  814  1,250 
  
  
  
  

 

 

  
  
  
  

 

 

At December 31

  29,555  29,555  29,555  5,777  5,749  4,904   29,555  29,555  29,555  5,956  5,777  5,749 
  
  
  
  

 

 

  
  
  
  

 

 

 

At December 31, 2007,2008, the Company had authorized common stock of 40,000,000 shares (December 31, 20062007 – 40,000,000). Issued shares at December 31, 2007,2008, were 29,554,500 (December 31, 20062007 – 29,554,500) including treasury stock of 5,777,4175,956,384 shares (December 31, 2006 – 5,749,494)5,777,417).

 

Note 17.16.     Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2008 the Company partially adopted FAS 157,Fair Value Measurements in respect of our pension plan assets and derivative instruments and this had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The fair values of our pension plan assets and derivative instruments are valued based on quoted prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and have not changed on adoption of FAS 157. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 permits companies that have not already issued either interim or annual financial statements reflecting its adoption to delay the effective adoption date in respect of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of FAS 157. Non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other than those meeting the definition of afinancial asset orfinancial liability as defined in FAS 159. The

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities for which FAS 157 has been deferred for adoption by the Company are property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangible assets and plant closure provisions. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FAS 157 for non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities will have a material impact on its financial statements.

As defined in FAS 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). As permitted under FAS 157, the Company utilizes a mid-market pricing convention for valuing the majority of its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company is able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. FAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement). As required by FAS 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. FAS 159 expands the scope of what entities may carry at fair value by offering an irrevocable option to record many types of financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company chose not to implement this option and accordingly the adoption of FAS 159 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table presents the carrying amount and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 20072008 and 2006:2007:

 

  2007

 2006

   2008

 2007

 

(in millions)


  Carrying
Amount


 Fair
Value


 Carrying
Amount


 Fair
Value


   Carrying
Amount


 Fair
Value


 Carrying
Amount


 Fair
Value


 

Non-derivatives:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $24.3  $24.3  $101.9  $101.9   $13.9  $13.9  $24.3  $24.3 

Long-term debt (including current portion)

   81.0   81.0   148.1   148.1    73.0   73.0   81.0   81.0 

Derivatives:

   

Derivatives (all level 1 measurement):

   

Interest rate swaps

   (0.5)  (0.5)  0.4   0.4    (0.7)  (0.7)  (0.5)  (0.5)

Interest rate swap option

   —     —     (0.1)  (0.1)

Foreign exchange contracts

   (0.4)  (0.4)  0.4   0.4    (12.3)  (12.3)  (0.4)  (0.4)

Commodity swaps

  $(0.5) $(0.5) $—    $—     $(1.3) $(1.3) $(0.5) $(0.5)

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term maturities of such instruments.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Long-term debt: The carrying amount of long-term borrowings at variable interest rates approximates fair value.

 

Derivatives: The fair value of derivatives that relates to interest rate swaps, interest rate swap options, foreign exchange contracts and commodity swaps was estimated based on current settlement prices and comparable contracts using current assumptions.

 

The cumulative gains and losses on the interest rate swaps and commodity swaps are summarized as follows:

 

(in millions)


  2007

 2006

  2008

 2007

 

Balance at January 1

  $0.4  $0.1  $(1.0) $0.4 

Change in fair value

   (1.4)  0.3   (1.0)  (1.4)
  


 

  


 


Balance at December 31

  $(1.0) $0.4  $(2.0) $(1.0)
  


 

  


 


 

The interest rate swaps have been designated as a cash flow hedge against $50.0 million of underlying floating rate debt obligations that stood at $81.0$73.0 million at December 31, 2007.2008. All of the swaps mature on June 12, 2009.

 

The commodity swaps are used to manage the Company’s cash flow exposure to raw material price volatility. They have been designated as cash flow hedges and all the commodity swaps qualify for hedge accounting as at December 31, 2007.2008.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The interest rate and commodity hedges were determined to be effective and consequently the unrealized loss of $2.0 million in 2008 (2007 – $1.0 million in 2007 (2006 - $0.4 million gain)loss) has been recorded in other comprehensive income. Ineffectiveness was determined to be immaterial in 20072008 and 20062007 and accordingly no gain or loss was recognized in earnings in either period. The Company does not expect any significant portion of the loss to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months.

 

Foreign exchange contracts primarily relate to contracts entered into to hedge future known transactions or hedge balance sheet net cash positions. The movements in the carrying and fair values of these contracts is largely due to changes in exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. The U.S. dollar has weakenedstrengthened significantly against other major currencies across 2007.in the latter part of 2008.

 

Note 18.     Financial17.     Derivative Instruments and Risk Management

 

The Company has limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and does not trade them. The Company does use derivatives to manage certain interest rate, foreign exchange exposures and raw material pricing exposures.

 

The Company uses interest rate swaps, floors, collar and cap agreements to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates on its floating rate debt. The swap agreements are contracts to exchange floating rate for fixed interest payments periodically over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amounts. The notional amounts of interest rate agreements are used to measurecalculate interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company has determined to hedge a proportion of the outstanding floating rate debt obligation. As at December 31, 2008 and 2007 the Company had the following interest rate instruments in effect (notional amounts in millions):

 

(in millions)


  Notional
Amount


  Strike
Rate


  Expiry date

Interest swap

  $20.0  4.7675% June 12, 2009
   $15.0  4.7800% June 12, 2009
   $15.0  4.7550% June 12, 2009

 

The Company has hedged the price of certain raw materials with commodity swaps. As at December 31, 2008 and 2007 the Company had the following summarized commodity swaps:

 

  2008

 2007

 

(in millions)


  Notional
Quantity

  Carrying
Amount


 Fair Value

   Carrying
Amount


 Fair
Value


 Carrying
Amount


 Fair
Value


 

Commodity swap

  450 metric tonnes  ($0.5) ($0.5)

Notional quantity – 3,101 tonnes

  $(1.3) $(1.3) 

Notional quantity – 450 tonnes

   $(0.5) $(0.5)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

We enter into various foreign currency forward exchange contracts to minimize currency exposure from expected future cash flows. The contracts have maturity dates of up to 12 months at the date of inception. At December 31, 2008, the fair value of outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts amounted to a $12.3 million loss (2007 – $0.4 million loss).

 

The Company sells a range of Fuel Specialties, Active Chemicals and Octane Additives to major oil refineries and chemical companies throughout the world. Credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation and account monitoring procedures are used to minimize bad debt risk. Collateral is not generally required.

 

Note 19.18.     Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company has commitments under operating leases primarily for office space, motor vehicles and various items of computer and office equipment. The leases are expected to be renewed and replaced in the normal course of business. Rental expense was $2.2 million in 2008, $2.1 million in 2007 and $1.9 million in 2006 and $2.4 million in 2005.2006. Future commitments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:

 

(in millions)


      

2008

  $1.8

2009

   1.4  $1.5

2010

   1.4   1.3

2011

   1.0   1.0

2012

   1.0   0.6

2013

   0.4

Thereafter

   2.8   2.1
  

  

  $9.4  $6.9
  

  

 

Commitments in respect of environmental remediation obligations are disclosed in Note 13.12.

Contingencies

Oil for Food Program and related investigations

On February 7, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified the Company that it had commenced an investigation to determine whether any violations of law had occurred in connection with certain transactions conducted by or involving the Company, including those conducted by its wholly owned indirect Swiss subsidiary, Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH (“Alcor”), under the United Nations Oil for Food Program (“OFFP”) between June 1, 1999 and December 31, 2003. As part of its investigation, the SEC issued a subpoena requiring the production of certain documents, including documents relating to these transactions, by the Company and Alcor. Upon receipt of the SEC’s notification and initial subpoena, the Company undertook a review of its participation in the OFFP.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

On October 10, 2007 and November 1, 2007, the SEC served two additional subpoenas on the Company. These additional subpoenas required the production of documents relating primarily to the OFFP, but also relating to transactions conducted by the Company or its subsidiaries with state owned or state controlled entities between June 1, 1999 and the date of such subpoenas, concerning the use of foreign agents and the possibility of extra-contractual payments to secure business with foreign governmental entities in the context of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other laws. In a co-ordinated investigation, the Company was also notified by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding the possibility of violations by the Company or its subsidiaries arising under other laws stemming from matters covered by the SEC investigation as well as certain preliminary inquiries regarding compliance with anti-trust laws applicable to the U.S. and international tetra-ethyl lead markets. The subjects into which the SEC and DOJ have inquired include areas that concern certain former and current executives of the Company, including the current CEO. The Company, and its officers and directors, are cooperating with the SEC and DOJ investigations.

On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company formed a committee comprised of the chairmen of the Board, the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, all of whom were independent directors. (The chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee retired as a director of the Company effective May 6, 2008, but his services have been retained in an independent capacity as a member of the committee). External counsel to the Company, reporting to the committee has, on behalf of the committee, conducted and will continue to conduct an investigation into the circumstances giving rise to the SEC and DOJ investigations. External counsel reports directly to the committee and assists in connection with communications and interactions with the SEC and DOJ.

On March 5, 2008, a letter was received by the Company from the DOJ in which a request for a wider and more detailed range of documents was made. The Company and its officers and directors intend to continue to co-operate with the SEC and DOJ.

Separately, on May 21, 2008, the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) notified Innospec Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, that it had commenced an investigation into certain contracts involving British companies under the OFFP. As part of this investigation, the SFO has asked the Company to produce documents in respect of the Company’s participation in the OFFP between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2003. Following receipt of the SFO’s notice the Company has instructed external legal counsel to advise and assist in relation to the investigation and the Company and its directors and officers intend to co-operate with the SFO. On October 16, 2008, the Company was further notified that the scope of the SFO’s investigation would extend to matters relating to potential bribery involving overseas commercial agents that are already in the large part the subject of the ongoing DOJ and SEC investigations.

The outcome of these investigations remains uncertain to the Company. On the facts available to us it is not yet possible to form any reasonable estimate of the potential disgorgement,

ContingenciesNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

penalties and fine payments, either by reference to a range of possible outcomes or by reference to the lower end of such a range of outcomes. The amount of any disgorgements, penalties or fines that the Company could face would depend on a number of eventual factors which are not currently known to the Company, including findings by relevant authorities regarding the amount, nature and scope of any improper payments, the amount of any pecuniary gain involved, the Company’s ability to pay, and the level of co-operation provided to government authorities during the investigations.

Because of the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome of these investigations and the costs to the Company of responding and participating in them, no assurance can be given that the ultimate costs incurred and sanctions that may be imposed will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and/or cash flows from operating activities.

At December 31, 2007 we had accrued $3.7 million in respect of estimated probable future legal and other professional expenses and provided no additional accruals in respect of the investigations. As part of our continuing commitment to co-operate and comply with the SEC and DOJ investigations, including the request for documents set out in the DOJ letter dated March 5, 2008, we accrued a further $6.8 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 in respect of estimated probable future legal and other professional expenses. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company provided no additional accruals in respect of these matters.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008 the Company accrued an additional $8.7 million in respect of estimated probable legal and other professional fees and expenses. The provision for probable future legal and other professional fees and expenses amounted to $3.4 million at December 31, 2008. These accruals are made on the basis of the Company’s then current best estimate, working in consultation with the committee of the Board of Directors, external legal counsel to the Company and its other professional advisors. Should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect or should any of the DOJ, SEC and/or the SFO alter the scope of the investigations, then the actual costs incurred by the Company could differ materially from current estimates.

The Company continues to keep the amount of such accrual provisions under review as it has been doing, including through working with the committee of the Board and external legal counsel and other professional advisors.

 

Bycosin Disposal

 

Voluntary disclosure of possible violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Given the international scope of its operations, the Company is subject to laws of many different jurisdictions, including laws relating to the imposition of restrictions on trade and investment with various entities, persons and countries, some of which laws are conflicting. In 2004 the Company reviewed, as it does periodically, aspects of its operations in respect of such restrictions, and determined to dispose of certain non-core,

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

non-U.S. subsidiaries of Bycosin AB. Bycosin’s non-U.S. subsidiaries had been engaged in transactions and activities involving Cuban persons and entities before the acquisition of the Bycosin Group by the Company in June 2001, and such subsidiaries were continuing to engage in such transactions and activities at the time of the disposal of the non-core Fuel Specialties business and related assets in November 2004. On November 15, 2004, Bycosin AB, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company organized under the laws of Sweden (now known as Innospec Sweden AB, the “Seller”), entered into a Business and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Pesdo Swedcap Holdings AB (the “Purchaser”), Håkan Byström and others as the Purchaser’s guarantors, and Octel Petroleum Specialties Limited (now known as Innospec Fuel Specialties Limited) as the Seller’s guarantor, and completed the all-cash transaction contemplated thereby (together with related transactions, the “Transaction”). The Agreement provided for, amongamongst other things: (i) the disposal of certain non-core Fuel Specialties business and related manufacturing and other assets of the Seller; and (ii) the supply and distribution of certain power products to certain geographic regions. The net consideration paid by the Purchaser was approximately US$2.9$2.9 million.

 

Following completion of the Transaction, the Company made a voluntary disclosure to the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) regarding transactions and activities engaged in by certain non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company. Disclosures, amongst other items, included that the aggregate monetary value of the transactions involving Cuban persons and entities conducted by the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries since January 1999 iswas approximately $26.6 million.

 

At this time, however, management believes that it would be speculative and potentially misleading for the Company to predict the specific nature or amount of penalties that OFAC might eventually assess against it. While penalties could be assessed on different bases, if OFAC assessed penalties against the Company on a “performance of contracts basis”, the applicable regulations provide for penalties, in the case of civil violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 CFR. Part 515) (“CACR”), of the lesser of $65,000 per violation or the value of the contract. Since January 1999, non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company have entered into 43 contracts with Cuban entities, each of which could be considered a separate violation of the CACR by OFAC. OFAC may take the position that the CACR should be interpreted or applied in a different manner, potentially even to permit the assessment of penalties equal to or greater than the value of the business conducted with Cuban persons or entities.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Company has considered the range of possible outcomes and potential penalties payable. In accordance with the Company’s accounting policies, provision has been made for management’s current best estimate of the potential liability, including anticipated legal costs. However, should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the actual outcome could differ materially from management’s current expectations. Management is not able to estimate the amount of any additional loss, if any.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

If the Company or its subsidiaries (current or former) were found not to have complied with the CACR, the Company believes that it could be subject to fines or other civil or criminal penalties which could be material.

Oil for Food

On February 7, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified the Company that it had commenced an investigation to determine whether any violations of law had occurred in connection with transactions conducted by the Company, including its wholly owned indirect subsidiary, Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH (“Alcor”), a Swiss company, under the United Nations Oil for Food Program (“OFFP”) between June 1, 1999 and December 31, 2003. As part of its investigation, the SEC issued a subpoena requiring the production of certain documents, including documents relating to these transactions, by the Company and Alcor. Upon receipt of the SEC’s notification and initial subpoena, the Company undertook a review of its participation in the OFFP. On October 10, 2007 and November 1, 2007 the SEC served two additional subpoenas on the Company. These additional subpoenas required the production of documents relating notably to the OFFP but also relating to transactions conducted by the Company or its subsidiaries with state owned or controlled entities between June 1, 1999 and the date of such subpoenas, relating to its use of foreign agents and the possibility of extra-contractual payments made to secure business with foreign governmental entities. In a co-ordinated investigation, the Company has also been contacted by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding the possibility of violations of relevant laws in the areas contained in the SEC subpoenas as well as additional preliminary inquiries regarding compliance with anti-trust laws relating to U.S. and international tetra ethyl lead markets. The subjects into which the SEC and DOJ have inquired include areas that involve certain former and current executives of the Company including the current CEO. The Company, and its officers and directors, are cooperating with the SEC and DOJ investigations. On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company formed a committee comprised of the chairmen of the Board, the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee respectively, all of whom are independent directors. Counsel to the Company, providing assistance to the committee has, on behalf of the committee, conducted and will continue to conduct an investigation into the circumstances giving rise to the SEC and DOJ investigations. Counsel will report directly to the committee and will assist in connection with interactions with the SEC and DOJ. While the outcome of these investigations is uncertain, a number of companies involved in the OFFP investigations have been required to disgorge profits and pay civil fines and penalties up to $30 million. As a result of information discovered in the course

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

of the investigation, we expect that we will be required to disgorge profits and pay fines and penalties that could be of similar magnitude. Any settlement of the SEC and DOJ inquiries relating to matters beyond the OFFP could require the Company to make significant additional disgorgements, penalty and fine payments. However at this time management is not able to predict with certainty the level of such fines and penalties. Because of the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome of these investigations and the costs to the Company of responding and participating in these on-going investigations, no assurance can be given that the ultimate costs and sanctions that may be imposed upon us will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows from operating activities. At December 31, 2007 we have accrued $3.7 million in respect of probable future legal expenses in respect of this matter and have provided no additional accruals for this matter.

 

Other Legal Matters

 

We are involved from time to time in claims and legal proceedings that result from, and are incidental to, the conduct of our business including product liability claims. There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party, or of which any of their property is subject, other than ordinary, routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

 

Guarantees

 

The Company and certain of itsthe Company’s consolidated subsidiaries wereare contingently liable asfor certain obligations of December 31, 2007, for $8.7 million,affiliated companies primarily relating toin the form of guarantees of debt of affiliated companies and performance under contracts entered into as a normal business practice. This included guarantees of non-U.S. excise taxes and customs duties. As at December 31, 2008, such contingent liabilities amounted to $6.9 million.

 

Under the terms of the guarantee arrangements, generally the Company would be required to perform should the affiliated company fail to fulfilfulfill its obligations under the arrangements. In some cases, the guarantee arrangements have recourse provisions that would enable the Company to recover any payments made under the terms of the guarantees from securities held of the guaranteed parties’ assets.

 

The Company and its affiliates have numerous long-term sales and purchase commitments in their various business activities, which are expected to be fulfilled with no adverse consequences material to the Company.

 

Indemnities and Warranties

 

In connection with the disposal of Octel Waste Management Limited on June 26, 2003, the Company provided certain warranties. The Company would be required to perform should the contingent liabilities in respect of the warranties become actual and could be required to make maximum future payments of £3.59 million ($7.15.2 million). There are no recourse provisions enabling recovery of any amounts from third parties nor are any assets held as collateral in respect of the warranties.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 20.19.     Profit on Disposals, net

 

(in millions)


  2007

  2006

 2005

  2008

  2007

  2006

 

Profit on disposal of surplus U.S. real estate

  $0.4  $—    $—   

Prepaid disposal costs

   —     —     (0.4)

Profit on disposal of surplus United Kingdom real estate

  $ —    $9.6  $ —     —     —     9.6 

Prepaid disposal costs

   —     (0.4)  —  
  

  


 

  

  

  


  $—    $9.2  $—    $0.4  $—    $9.2 
  

  


 

  

  

  


The profit on disposal of the surplus U.S. real estate relates to the sale in May 2008 of the Company’s former manufacturing site in Elmwood Park, N.J.. Prepaid disposal costs in 2006 relate to expenditure being incurred in advance of this real estate being marketed and disposed of.

 

The profit on disposal of surplus United Kingdom real estate relates to the sale in August 2006 of the Company’s former Fuel Technology Centre in Bletchley and sale in July 2006 of the Company’s former sports and social club.

Prepaid disposal costs in 2006 relate to expenditure being incurred in respect of one of our U.S. former manufacturing sites, in advance of it being marketed and disposed of.

On November 15, 2004, the Company disposed of certain manufacturing and other assets held by our Swedish subsidiary, Bycosin AB. As part of the sale of the Swedish manufacturing and other assets, Bycosin de Mexico SA de CV and Bycosin SA de CV, non-core subsidiaries of Innospec Sweden AB, were also disposed of in their entirety. As there will be no ongoing involvement with this business, this element of the transaction has been included within discontinued operations (see Note 21). As the Company will continue to source product to support the marine and power markets from Sweden, the sale of the Swedish manufacturing and other assets does not meet the criteria laid down in FAS 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,for inclusion within discontinued operations.

Note 21.    Discontinued Operations

On December 31, 2005, the Company disposed of two non-core businesses, Octel Performance Chemicals Inc. and the Gamlen Industries SA waste water treatment business. The consideration received was $1.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The net assets disposed of were $3.1 million which comprised:

(in millions)


  Octel
Performance
Chemicals
Inc.


  Gamlen
Industries SA
waste water
treatment
business


 

Accounts receivable

  $1.0  $0.4 

Inventories

   0.9   0.5 

Property, plant and equipment

   0.5   0.1 

Goodwill

   0.5   —   

Accounts payable

   (0.9)  (0.3)

Intercompany balances

   0.4   —   
   


 


   $2.4  $0.7 
   


 


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The net loss on disposal for Octel Performance Chemicals Inc. was $1.6 million which includes the net loss for the year of $0.4 million.

The net profit on disposal of the Gamlen Industries SA waste water treatment business was $0.2 million which includes the net loss for the year of $0.3 million, professional fees of $0.2 million and a tax charge of $0.5 million.

On November 15, 2004, the Company disposed of a non-core business, Bycosin Mexico, for consideration of $0.9 million. The net assets disposed of were $4.8 million which comprised:

(in millions)


    

Cash

  $0.5 

Accounts receivable

   3.4 

Inventories

   0.8 

Prepaid expenses

   0.6 

Property, plant and equipment

   0.2 

Goodwill

   2.7 

Accounts payable

   (0.3)

Intercompany balances

   (3.1)
   


   $4.8 
   


The net loss on disposal was $3.9 million which includes the net income of Bycosin Mexico for 2004 up to the date of disposal of $0.4 million, professional fees of $0.2 million and a tax charge of $0.2 million.

 

Note 22.20.     Other Balance Sheet Information

 

The Company holds investments that are not consolidated or equity accounted since we do not have a controlling financial interest and they are not material, respectively. These investments are held at cost less provision for impairment. The principal affiliate is as follows:

 

   Ownership interest

 

Ferrous Corp

  47.746.5%

 

In 2007 the Company sold its 27.5% share of PotatoPak Limited for $0.1 million generating a profit of $0.1 million. In 2006 the Company sold its 20% share of Deurex and 50.0% share of Octel Chemay (Pty) Limited, both for no profit or loss.

 

All of the unconsolidated affiliates are privately held companies and as such quoted market prices are not available. No dividends were received during 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005.2006.

 

Note 23.21.     Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In September 2006,April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157,142-3,Fair Value MeasurementsDetermination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which defines fair value, establishes (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a frameworkrecognized intangible asset under FAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fairthe Company as of January 1, 2009. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

value measurements. TheIn March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures surrounding the use and financial reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities. This statement is effective for the Company is required to adopt FAS 157 effective the first quarteras of 2008.January 1, 2009. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standardFAS 161 will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.FAS 159 expands the scope of what entities may carry at fair value by offering an irrevocable option to record many types of financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value would be recorded in an entity’s income statement. This accounting standard also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements that are intended to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. FAS 159 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 though earlier application is permitted under certain circumstances. The Company will adopt FAS 159 effective the first quarter of 2008. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective prospectively, except for certain retrospective disclosure requirements, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.the Company as of January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impactdoes not believe that the adoption of FAS 160 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141R,Business Combinations – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 141, which significantly changes the principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statementFAS 141R is effective prospectively, except for certain retrospective adjustments to deferred tax balances,the Company beginning January 1, 2009, and will change the accounting for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of FAS 141R will havebusiness combinations on its financial statements.a prospective basis.

Item 9Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9AControls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934).

 

Based upon this evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2007,2008, in timely making known material information relating to the Company and the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act.

 

Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.2008. In making this assessment, management used the criteria inInternal Control — Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

 

Based on the evaluation the Company concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2008, based on criteria in theInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

 

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom (PwC), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

 

The Company is continuously seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations and of its internal controls. This results in refinements to processes throughout the

Company. However, there has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9BOther Information

 

None.

PART III

 

Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

Information under the heading “Management” set out in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 6, 20087, 2009 (“the Proxy Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference.

 

At its Board Meeting on February 24, 2004, the Company formally adopted a Code of Ethics. Any stockholder who requires a copy of the Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines or any of the Board Committee Charters may obtain one by writing to the General Counsel, Innospec Inc., Innospec Manufacturing Park, Oil Sites Road, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, CH65 4EY, e-mailinvestor@innospecinc.com. These documents can also be accessed via the Company’s website,www.innospecinc.com.

 

Information regarding the composition and the workings of the Audit Committee are included under the headings “Corporate Governance – Committees of the Board of Directors – Audit Committee” and “Audit Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 11Executive Compensation

 

The information under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The information under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Shares Authorized for Issuance underUnder Equity Compensation Plans

 

The information contained in the table entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” under the heading “Equity Compensation Plans” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The current limit for the total amount of shares which can be issued or awarded under the Company’s five share option plans is 6,086,000.1,790,000.

 

Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information under the headings “Transactions with Executives, Officers, Directors and Others” and “Certain Other Transactions and Relationships” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Information with respect to fees and services related to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, is contained in the Audit Committee Report under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

 

Item 15Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)  (1)Financial Statements

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements of Innospec Inc. and its subsidiaries and related notes thereto, together with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated February 25, 2008,20, 2009, appear on pages 4952 through 9497 of the 20072008 Form 10-K to stockholders, are incorporated in Item 8.

 

 (2)Financial Statement Schedules

 

All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the information required to be submitted has been included in the financial statements or because they are either not applicable or not required under the Rules of Regulations S-X.

 

 (3)Exhibits

 

2.1  Transfer and Distribution Agreement, dated as of April 24, 1998, between Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (“GLCC”) and the Registrant. (3)
3.1  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. (1)
3.2  Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant. (1)
4.1  Form of Common Stock Certificate. (2)
4.2  Form of Rights Agreement between the Registrant and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent. (2)
4.3Form of Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant. (2)
4.4Indenture dated as of May 1, 1998 among the Registrant, Octel Developments PLC and the IBJ Schroder Bank and Trust Company, as trustee. (4)
4.5Form of 10% Senior Notes (contained in Exhibit 4.4 as Exhibit A). (4)
4.64.3  Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 30, 1998 among the Registrant, Octel Developments PLC and the initial purchasers. (1)
4.74.4  Purchase Agreement dated as of April 30, 1998 among the Initial Purchasers, Octel Developments PLC and the Registrant. (4)

4.84.5  Share purchase agreement between OBOAdler Holdings Limited and The Associated Octel Company Limited relating to the sale and purchase of the whole of the issued share capital of OBOAdler Company Limited, dated June 1, 1999. (6)(5)
4.9Amendment to Rights Agreement. (10)
4.104.6  Share Repurchase Plan between the Company and J. P.J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. dated February 16, 2006. (23)
4.11Share Repurchase Plan between the Company and J. P. Morgan Securities Inc. dated August 21, 2006. (25)29, 2008. (6)
10.1  Tax Disaffiliation Agreement between GLCC and the Registrant. (1)Innospec Inc. 2004 Non Employee Directors’ Stock Plan. (9)
10.2  Corporate Services Transition Agreement between GLCC and the Registrant. (1)Innospec Inc. 2004 Executive Co-Investment Plan. (9)

10.3Supply Agreement between GLCC and the Registrant for the supply of ethylene dibromide. (1)
10.4Supply Agreement between GLCC and the Registrant for the Supply of anhydrous hydrogen bromide. (1)
10.5Supply Agreement for the Supply of 10% sodium hydroxide solution. (1)
10.6Ethyl Corporation Market and Sales Agreement. (4)
10.7Innospec Inc. Non Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (4)
10.8Employment Agreement between Associated Octel Limited and Steve W Williams, Geoff J Hignett, Graham M Leathes and Robert A Lee. (1)
10.9Employment Agreement between Associated Octel Limited and Dennis J Kerrison. (1)
10.10Agreement between GLCC and the Registrant for the Toll Manufacturing of Stadis Product. (4)
10.11Innospec Inc. Time Restricted Stock Option Plan. (3)
10.12  Innospec Inc. Performance Related Stock Option Plan. (3)
10.13Associated Octel Savings-Related Stock Option Plan. (3)
10.14Form of Innospec Inc. Approved Company Share Option Plan. (8)
10.15Form of Innospec Inc. Profit Sharing Share Scheme. (8)
10.16Employment Agreement between The Associated Octel Company Limited and Alan G Jarvis.Plan, as amended. (9)
10.1710.4  Employment offer letter from The Associated Octel Company Limited to John P Tayler. (9)

10.18Consultancy Agreement between Innospec Inc. and Robert E Bew.Company Share Option Plan, as amended. (9)
10.1910.5  Employment offer letter from The Associated Octel Company Limited to Ian A Watling. (11)Innospec Inc. Savings Related Share Option Scheme, as amended. (9)
10.2010.6  Employment offer letter from The Associated Octel Company Limited to Philip J Boon. (11)(7)
10.2110.7  Executive Services agreement, Richard Shone (13)Shone. (8)
10.22Contract of Employment, Sharon Todd. (13)
10.2310.8  Contract of Employment, Ian McRobbie. (13)(8)
10.2410.9  Contract of Employment, Paul Jennings. (13)(8)
10.25Contract of Employment, Alexander Dobbie. (13)
10.2610.10  Contract of Employment, Dr. Catherine Hessner. (17)(11)
10.2710.11  Contract of Employment, Andrew Hartley. (17)(11)
10.28$100,000,000 term loan agreement between Innospec Inc., Octel Associates, Barclays Capital, Barclays Bank plc and others, dated June 3, 1999. (6)
10.29US$250,000,000 Facilities Agreement dated 29 October 2001 for Innospec Inc. with Barclays Capital acting as mandated Lead Arranger and Barclays Bank plc acting as Agent and Security Agent. (12)
10.30Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated 30 January 2004, relating to a Facilities Agreement, dated 29 October 2001 (as amended), by and among the Registrant, Barclays Bank plc, Lloyds TSB Bank plc, The Governor and Company of The Bank of Scotland, and certain other parties thereto. (14)
10.3110.12  Business and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 15, 2004, between Bycosin AB, Håkan Byström and others, and Octel Petroleum Specialties Limited. (16)(10)
10.3210.13  Supply Agreement, dated November 15, 2004, between Bycosin AB and Pesdo Swedcap Holdings AB. (16)(10)
10.33Resignation Agreement of Mr. D. Kerrison, dated April 12, 2005. (18)
10.3410.14  Contract of Employment, Paul W. Jennings, dated September 21, 2005. (19)(12)
10.3510.15  Contract of Employment, Patrick Williams, dated October 11, 2005. (20)(13)
10.36Fixed term agreement, James F. Lawler, dated December 7, 2005. (21)

10.37Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated 13 December, 2005, relating to a Facilities Agreement, dated 29 October 2001 (as amended), by and among the Registrant, Barclays Bank plc, Lloyds TSB Bank plc, The Governor and Company of The Bank of Scotland, and certain other parties thereto. (22)
10.3810.16  Contract of Employment, Ian Cleminson, dated June 30, 2006. (24)(14)
10.17Innospec Inc. Performance Related Stock Option Plan 2008. (15)
10.18Innospec Inc. Company Share Option Plan 2008. (15)
10.19Innospec Inc. Non Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan 2008. (15)
10.20Innospec Inc. Sharesave Plan 2008. (15)
10.21U.S. $150,000,000 three year Facilities Agreement dated February 6, 2009 with Lloyds TSB plc as agent, Company term loan facility of $50,000,000 and revolving loan of $100,000,000. (16)
12.1  Statement Regarding Computation of Financial Ratios (filed herewith).
13.1Opinion of Ernst & Young LLP on 1997 Combined Financial Statements. (9)
14  The Innospec Inc. Code of Ethics. (15)(9)
21.1  Principal Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).
23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
24.1  Powers of Attorney of Directors and Officers of the Registrant. (4)

31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
99.1Consolidated Financial Statements of OBOAdler Company Limited as of June 30, 1999 and for the year then ended. (7)

 

Notes

 

 (1)Incorporated by reference to the Company’s amendment dated April 21, 1998, to a previously filed Form 10-12B/A.

 

 (2)Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-12B/A previously filed on April 10, 1998.

 

 (3)Incorporated by reference to the Company’s amendment dated May 4, 1998 to a previously filed Form 10-12B/A.

 

 (4)Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-4 previously filed on October 1, 1998.

(5)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q on November 10, 1998.

 

 (6)(5)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on November 12, 1999.

 

 (7)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K/A on January 20, 2000.

(8)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-K on March 26, 1999.

(9)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-K on March 27, 2000.

(10)(6)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on July 21, 2000.March 3, 2008.

 

 (11)(7)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-K on March 26, 2001.

 

 (12)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-K on March 25, 2002.

(13)(8)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-K on March 28, 2003.

 

 (14)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on February 9, 2004.

(15)(9)Filed with the Company’s Proxy Statement on March 15, 2004.

 

 (16)(10)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on November 19, 2004.

 

 (17)(11)Filed with the Company’s Form 10-K on March 31, 2005.

 

 (18)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on April 12, 2005.

(19)(12)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on September 27, 2005.

 

 (20)(13)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on October 12, 2005.

 

 (21)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on December 7, 2005.

(22)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on December 19, 2005.

(23)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on February 17, 2006.

(24)(14)Filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on June 30, 2006.

 

 (25)(15)Filed with the Company’s FormProxy Statement on March 31, 2008.

(16)Filed with the Company’s 8-K on August 21, 2006.February 10, 2009.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

INNOSPEC INC.  By:  

/s/ Paul W. Jennings


(Registrant)     PAUL W. JENNINGS
Date:     President and Chief Executive Officer

February 25, 200820, 2009

      

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 25, 2008:20, 2009:

 

/s/ Ian P. Cleminson


Ian P. Cleminson

   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ian P. Cleminson

/s/ Robert E. Bew


Dr Robert E. Bew

   Chairman and Director
Dr Robert E. Bew

/s/ Hugh G. C. Aldous


Hugh Aldous

   Director
Hugh Aldous

/s/ Peter H. C. Fearn


Peter Fearn

   Director

/s/ Charles M. Hale


Charles M. Hale

Peter Fearn
  Director

/s/ Martin M. Hale


Martin M. Hale

   Director

/s/ Samuel A. Haubold


Samuel A. Haubold

Martin M. Hale
  Director

/s/ James M. C. Puckridge


James Puckridge

   Director
James Puckridge

/s/ Joachim Roeser


Joachim Roeser

   Director
Joachim Roeser

 

104105