UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

or

¨ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO ______________

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-13270

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE

Delaware

90-0023731

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2930 W. Sam Houston Parkway N. #300

Houston, TX

77043

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (713) 849-9911

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(713) 849-9911

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

5.25% Convertible Senior Notes

New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

Due 2028 and guarantees

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨  No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨  No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer¨ Accelerated filer¨

Non-accelerated filer  x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨  No x

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:

NONE

Indicate by check mark if

YES

NO

the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20092010 (based on the closing market price on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on June 30, 2009)2010) was approximately $45,224,000 (determined by subtracting the number of shares held by affiliates of Flotek Industries, Inc. on that date from the total number of shares outstanding on that date). $35,619,237.

At March 16, 2010,7, 2011, there were 24,215,28343,034,446 outstanding shares of Flotek Industries, Inc.the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required in Part III of the Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the registrant’s 20102011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Back to Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

">

PART I

1

PART IITEM 1

Business

1

Item 1.ITEM 1A

Business

1

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

6

5

Item 1B.ITEM 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

19

14

Item 2.ITEM 2

Properties

Properties14

ITEM 3

20

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

21

15

Item 4.ITEM 4

(Removed and Reserved)

15

ReservedPART II

21

16

PART IIITEM 5

22

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

22

16

Item 6.ITEM 6

Selected Financial Data

25

18

Item 7.ITEM 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

26

19

Item 7A.ITEM 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

46

32

Item 8.ITEM 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

47

32

Item 9.ITEM 9

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

81

58

Item 9A(T).ITEM 9A

Controls and Procedures

81

58

Item 9B.ITEM 9B

Other Information

83

59

PART III

84

61

Item 10.ITEM 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

84

61

Item 11.ITEM 11

Executive Compensation

84

61

Item 12.ITEM 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

84

61

Item 13.ITEM 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

84

61

Item 14.ITEM 14

Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services

84

61

PART IV

85

62

Item 15.ITEM 15

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

85

62

SIGNATURESSignatures

88

65

i


Back to Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSForward-Looking Statements

We have included in this

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), and from time to time our management may make, statements that may constitutein particular, Item 7- “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-5, of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent only ourthe Company’s current beliefassumptions and beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside ourof the Company’s control. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report are based onupon information available as of the date of this Annual Report. Many of these forward lookingThe forward-looking statements relate to future industry trends actions, futureand economic conditions, forecast performance or results of current and anticipatedfuture initiatives and the outcome of contingencies and other uncertainties that may have a significant impact on ourthe Company’s business, future operating results and liquidity. We try, whenever possible, to identify theseThese forward-looking statements generally are identified by using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “forecast,” “project” and similar expressions, foror future-tense or conditional constructions (“will,such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” etc.). We caution you The Company cautions that these statements are onlymerely predictions and are not to be considered as guarantees of future performance. These forward-lookingForward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and our actual results, developments and businessassumptions that are subject to certainrisks and uncertainties that can cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied. A detailed discussion of potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those anticipated by these statements. By identifying theseforward-looking statements for youis included in Part I, Item 1A- “Risk Factors” in this manner, we are alerting you toAnnual Report and periodically in future reports filed with the possibility that our actual results may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results indicated in these forward-looking statements. We assumeSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The Company has no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events, except as required by law. Important factors that could cause actual results


Back to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and those described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Contents

ii


PART I

Item 1.Business.

PART I    

GeneralITEM 1  Business

General

Flotek Industries, Inc. (“Flotek” or the “Company”) is a diversified global supplier of drilling and production related products and servicesservices. The Company’s strategic focus, and that of all wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the oil and gas industry. Our core focus is“Company”), includes oilfield specialty chemicals and logistics, downholedown-hole drilling tools and downholedown-hole production tools. Ontools used in the energy and mining industries. In December 27, 2007, ourthe Company’s common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”(the “NYSE”) under the stock ticker symbol “FTK.” Our website is located athttp://www.flotekind.com. We make available free of charge on or through our internet website our Annual Reportsreports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,10Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange(“the Exchange Act”), are posted to the Company’s website, www.flotekind.com as soon as reasonably practicable aftersubsequent to electronically filing such material with, or furnishing it to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC. Information contained in ouron the Company’s website or links contained on our website areis not to be considered as part of thisany regulatory filing. As used herein, “Flotek,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” may referrefers to Flotek Industries, Inc. and/or itsthe Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. The use of these terms is not intended to connote any particular corporate status or relationships.relationship.

Historical Developments

Flotek was originally

The Company incorporated under the laws ofin the Province of British Columbia on May 17, 1985. On October 23, 2001, we approved a change in ourthe Company moved the corporate domicile to the state of Delaware and culminated a reverse stock split of 120 to 1. OnEffective October 31, 2001, wethe Company completed a reverse merger with CESI Chemical, Inc. (“CESI”). Since that date, we havethe Company has grown through a series of acquisitions.acquisitions and organic growth.

For information relating to our acquisitions during 2008 and 2007, refer to Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Description of Operations

Our business is organized into

The Company has three strategic business units or segments: Chemicals and Logistics (“Chemicals”), Drilling Products (“Drilling”) and Artificial Lift. Each segment offers variouscompetitive products and services derived from patented technological advances that are reactive to industry demands in both domestic and requires different technology and marketing strategies. All three segments market products domestically and internationally.international markets.

For financialFinancial information regarding each segmentoperational segments and geographic areas in which we operate, see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements included inconcentration is provided within this Annual Report. See Part II, “Item 8. Item 8-“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” and Note 17- Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Chemicals and Logistics

The chemicalChemicals business offers a full spectrum ofprovides oil field and natural gas field specialty chemicals used for use in drilling, cementing, stimulation and production activities designed to maximize recovery fromwithin both new and mature fields. OurThe Company’s specialty chemicals are key to the success of this business segment. Our specialty chemicals havepossess enhanced performance characteristics and are manufactured to withstand a widebroad range of downholedown-hole pressures, temperatures and other well-specific conditions. We operateconditions and compliant with customer specifications. The Company has two laboratories,operational laboratories: 1) a technical services laboratory and 2) a research and development laboratory, which focuslaboratory. Each focuses on design improvements, development and viability testing of new chemical formulations andformulations; as well as continued enhancement of existing products, often in cooperation with our customers.

Ourproducts. CESI branded micro-emulsions are patented (US & foreign)both domestically and internationally and are therefore unique in theproven strategically cost effective alternatives within both oil and natural gas market. Micro-emulsionsmarkets. The Company’s micro-emulsions are environmentally friendly stable mixtures of oil, water and surface active agents forming athat form complex nano-fluid innano-fluids which theorganize molecules are organized (or assembled) into nanostructures. The combinationcombined advantage of solvent,

solvents, surface active agent(s) and structure provide betterdrilling structures result in increased well treatment results thanas compared to the independent use of solventsolvents and surface active agent(s) alone.. CESI’s micro-emulsions are composed of renewable, plant derived, cleaning ingredients and oils andthat are certified as biodegradable. Some of theCertain micro-emulsions have received approvalbeen approved for use in the North Sea meetingwhich has some of the most stringent oil field environmental standards in the world. CESI’sThe Company’s micro-emulsions have documentedbenefited both operational and financial benefitresults in both low permeability sand and shale reservoirs.

Our

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 1


Back to Contents

The logistics business designs, projectoperates and manages and operates automated bulk material handling and loading facilities for oilfield service companies. Thesefacilities. The bulk facilities handle oilfield products, including sand and other materials for well-fracturing operations, dry cement and additives for oil and natural gas well cementing, and supplies andsupply materials used in oilfield operations, which we blend to customer specification.operations.

Drilling Products

We areThe Company is a leading provider of downholedown-hole drilling tools usedfor use in the oilfield, mining, water-well and industrial drilling sectors. We manufacture, sell, rentactivities. Further, the Company manufactures, sells, rents and inspectinspects specialized equipment for useused in drilling, completion, production and workover activities. Through internal growth initiatives, operational best practices and acquisitions, we havethe Company has realized increased the size and breadth of our rental tool inventoryactivity and broadened its geographic scope of operations so that we now conductoperations. Established tool rental operations are strategically located throughout the United States (the “US”) and in selectan increasing number of international markets. Our rentalRental tools include stabilizers, drill collars, reamers, wipers, jars, shock subs, wireless survey, and measurement while drilling (“MWD”) tools and mud-motors, while equipmentmud-motors. Equipment sold primarily includes mining equipment, centralizers and drill bits. We focus ourThe Company remains focused on product marketing efforts primarily in the Southeast, Northeast, Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States, withUS, as well as on international sales currently conducted throughexpansion using third party agents and employees.

Artificial Lift

We provideThe Company provides pumping system components, including electric submersible pumps or ESPs,(“ESP’s”), gas separators, production valves and complementary services. OurArtificial Lift products addresssatisfy the needsrequirements of coal bed methane and traditional oil and natural gas production to efficiently moveand assist natural gas, oil and other fluids movement from the producing horizon to the surface. Several of our Artificial Lift products employ uniqueproprietary technologies instrumental to improveimproved well performance. Our patentedPatented Petrovalve product optimizesproducts optimize pumping efficiency in horizontal completions as well as heavy oil wells and wells with high liquid to gas ratios. This unique valve can bePetrovalve products placed horizontally results in increasedincrease flow per stroke, and eliminateseliminate gas locking by replacing theof traditional ball and seat valvevalves that requiresrequire more maintenance. Furthermore, ourThe patented gas separation technology is particularly applicable foreffective in coal bed methane production, as it efficiently separatesseparating gas and water downhole,down-hole as well as ensuring solution gas is not lost in water production. Because gas isGas separated downhole, it reducesdown-hole, contributes to a reduction in the environmental impact of escaped gas at the surface. The majority of our products for Artificial Lift products are manufactured in China, assembled domestically and distributed globally.

Seasonality

On an overall basis, our segment

Overall, operations are not generally affected by seasonality. CertainWhile certain working capital components may build and recede duringthroughout the year reflectingin conjunction with established selling cycles and business cyclesthat can impact our operations and financial position, when compared to other periods, but we dothe Company does not consider our operations to be highly seasonal. However, theThe performance, of certain services in allwithin each of the Company’s segments may be temporarily affected byhowever, is susceptible to both weather and natural phenomena. Examples of how suchnaturally occurring phenomena, can impact our business include:including:

the severity and duration of the winter temperatures in North America can have a significantthat impact onnatural gas storage levels and drilling activity for natural gas;activity;

the timing and duration of theCanadian spring thaw in Canada directly affectsand resulting road restrictions that impacts activity levels due to road restrictions;levels; and

timing and impact of hurricanes can disruptupon both coastal and offshore operations.

In addition, theArtificial Lift results of operations of the Chemical and Logistics segment are historically stronger in the fourth quarter of the year due to higher spending near the end of the year by our customers. Also, the results of operations of our Artificial Lift segment are historically weakerweakest in the second quarter of the calendar year due to Federal land drilling restrictions on drilling on federal lands becauseduring identified breeding seasons of the breeding season of certainprotected bird species.

Product Demand and Marketing

The demand

Demand for ourthe Company’s products and services is generally correlatedreactive to the level of natural gas storage and to a lesser extentproduction, oil and natural gas well drilling, activity,and corresponding work-over activity, and gas production levels, both in the United Statesdomestically and internationally. We market our products primarily through direct salesProducts are marketed directly to our customers through sales employees with the assistance of operations employeescontractual agency agreements and Company management. We have establishedemployees. Established customer relationships which provide for repeat sales inopportunities within all of our segments. The majority of our marketingMarketing is currently conductedconcentrated within the United States.US. Internationally we operatethe Company primarily throughoperates using third party agents in Canada, Mexico, Central andAmerica, South America, the Middle East, and Asia.

Customers

The customers for our products and services includeCompany’s customer base includes major integrated oil and natural gas companies, independent oil and natural gas companies, pressure pumping service companies and state-owned national oil companies. One of our customers, Halliburton Companycustomer and its affiliated companies,affiliates accounted for 17%12%, 17% and 20% and 21% of ourthe Company’s consolidated revenuesrevenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and 2007, respectively. OurThe Company’s top three customers together accounted for 22%18%, 26%22% and 25%26% of consolidated revenuesrevenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 2


Back to Contents

Research and Development

We are

The Company is engaged in research and development activities directed primarily towardfocused on the improvement of existing products and services, the design of specialized “customer need” products to meet customer needs and the development of new products, processes and services. WeFor the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company incurred $1.4 million, $2.1 million $1.9 million and $0.8$1.9 million in research and development expenses, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In 2009, our2010, research and development spending was approximately 1.9%expenditures approximated 1% of consolidated revenues. We intendrevenue. The Company intends to maintain our near-term research and development investment at levels consistent with 20092010 expenditures.

Backlog

Due to the nature of our businessthe Company’s contractual customer relationships and contracts with our customers, we dooperational management, the Company has historically not experience anyhad significant amount of backlog orders.order activity.

Intellectual Property

We have followed a

The Company’s policy of seekingis to ensure patent protection, both within and outside of the United StatesUS, for all products and methods that appeardeemed to have commercial significance and qualify for patent protection. The decision to seekpursue patent protection depends onis dependent upon whether suchpatent protection can be obtained, on a cost-effective basiscost-effectiveness and is likely to be effective in protecting ouralignment with commercial interests. We believe ourThe Company believes patents and trademarks, togethercombined with our trade secrets, and proprietary design,designs, manufacturing and operational expertise, are reasonably adequateappropriate to protect our intellectual property and provide for theensure continued operation of our business. We maintainstrategic business operations. The Company currently has patents pending on our production valve design, casing centralizer design, ProSeries tools,tool design and trade secrets, and havesecrets. Existing patents pending on certain specialty chemicals. Patents expire at various dates during 20212022 and 2022.2023.

Competition

Our

The ability to compete in the oilfield services marketindustry is dependent on ourupon the Company’s ability to differentiate our products and services, provide superior quality and service, and maintain a competitive cost structure. Activity levels in our threeall segments are driven primarilyimpacted by current and expected commodity prices, vertical and horizontal drilling rig count, other oil and natural gas

drilling activity, production levels and customer capital spending allocated for drilling and production. Theproduction designated capital spending. Domestic and international regions in which we operateFlotek operates are highly competitive. The competitive environment has recently intensified as recentdue to mergers among oil and gas companies have reducedand the reduction in the number of available customers. Additionally, the recentThe 2009 global economic downturn in the economy and corresponding commodity prices haveprice fluctuations caused the market for ourthe Company’s services, and that of our competitors which may vary significantly by geographical region, to contract. Many otherdecline. Certain competing oil and natural gas service companies are larger than we areFlotek and have greater resources than we have.access to more resources. These competitors maycould be better ablesituated to withstand industry downturns, compete on the basis of price and acquire and develop new equipment and technologies,technologies; all of which, could affect ourthe Company’s revenue and profitability. These competitorsOil and natural gas service companies also compete with us both for customers and for acquisitions of other businesses. Thisstrategic business opportunities. Thus, competition may cause our business to suffer. We believecould have a detrimental impact upon the Company’s business. The Company expects that competition for contracts and margins will continue to be intense in the foreseeable future.

Raw Materials

We believe that materials

Materials and components used in ourthe Company’s servicing and manufacturing operations, andas well as those purchased for sale are generally available on the open market and from multiple sources, although collectionsources. Collection and transportation of these raw materials to ourCompany facilities canhowever could be adversely affected by extreme weather conditions. However,Additionally, certain raw materials used by our Chemical and Logistics segment in the manufacture of our patented micro-emulsion chemicalsChemicals segments are available from limited sources, and disruptionssources. Disruptions to our suppliers could materially impact our sales. The prices we paypaid for raw materials may be affected by, among other things,are contingent on energy, steel and other commodity prices;price fluctuations; tariffs, and duties on imported materials;materials, foreign currency exchange rates; the generalrates, business cycle position and global demand. During 2009,2010, the pricesprice of many raw materials declined; however, we expect to see prices increaseincreased and additional increases are anticipated in 2010.2011. Higher prices andcombined with lower availability of chemicals, steel and other raw materials used in our business maycould adversely impact future period sales and margins. Ourcontract fulfillments.

The Drilling Products and Artificial Lift segments purchase the principal raw materialmaterials and steel on the open market. Except for a few chemical additives,market from numerous suppliers. When able, the raw materials are available in most cases from several suppliers at market prices. Where we can, we useCompany uses multiple suppliers, both domestically and internationally, for our keyall raw materials purchases.

We also maintainThe Drilling segment maintains a three to six month supply of key mud-motor inventory parts that are primarily sourced from China as well as an equivalent amount of stock of parts necessary to meet forecast demand within our Artificial Lift segment. Thisoperations. The Company’s inventory stock position approximates the lead time required to secure these parts in order to avoid disruption of service to our customers.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 3


Back to Contents

Government Regulations

We are

The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental, and occupational safety and health laws and regulations inwithin the United StatesUS and other countries in which we dothe Company does business. We are subjectThe Company strives to numerous environmental, legal, andensure full compliance with all regulatory requirements related to our operations worldwide. We strive to comply fully with these requirements and are not awareis unaware of any material instances of noncompliance. In the United States, theseUS, compliance laws and regulations include, among others:

the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act;

the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;

the Clean Air Act;

the Federal Water Pollution Control Act; and

the Toxic Substances Control Act.

In addition to theUS federal laws and regulations, states andthe Company does business in other countries where we do business may have numerouswith extensive environmental, legal, and regulatory requirements by which wethe Company must abide. We evaluate and addressThe Company evaluates the environmental impact of our operations by assessingall Company actions and remediatingattempts to quantify the price of contaminated propertiesproperty in order to identify and avoid future liabilities and complyliability, as well as maintain compliance with environmental, legal, and regulatory requirements. ManySeveral of theChemicals products

within our Chemicals and Logistics segment are considered hazardous or flammable. IfIn the event of a leak or spill occurs in connectionassociation with ourCompany operations, we could incurthe Company is exposed to risk of material costs,cost, net of insurance proceeds, to remediate any resulting contamination. On occasion, we areThe Company is occasionally involved in specific environmental litigation and claims, including the remediation of properties we ownowned or have operated, as well as efforts to meet or correct compliance-related matters. We dooperated. The Company does not expect costs related to theseknown remediation requirements to have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s consolidated financial position or our results of operations.

Employees

As of March 16,

At December 31, 2010, wethe Company had approximately 320312 employees, worldwide. Noneexclusive of our employees areexisting worldwide agency relationships. No company employee is covered by collective bargaining agreementsagreement and our labor relations are generally good. In certainpositive. Certain international locations,location changes in staffing or work arrangements may need approval ofare contingent upon local workswork councils or other bodies.regulatory approval.

Available Information

We maintain a web site

The Company’s website is accessible atwww.flotekind.comhttps://www.flotekind.com.. We make available, free of charge, on the “Investor Relations” section of our web site, our Annual Reportsreports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available (see “Investor Relations” section on the Company’s website), as soon as reasonably practicable after wesubsequent to the Company electronically filefiling or furnish such materialsotherwise providing reports to the SEC. Additionally, our corporateCorporate governance materials, including governance guidelines; the charters of the Audit, Compensation,guidelines, charter and Governance and Nominating Committees; and the code of conduct mayare also be found underavailable on the “Investor Relations” section of our web site atwww.flotekind.com.website. A copy of the foregoing corporate governance materials is available upon written request.request to the Company.

You may read and copy any materials we fileAll material filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public“Public Reference RoomRoom” at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information20549 is available to be read or copied. Information regarding the Public“Public Reference RoomRoom” can be obtained by callingcontacting the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition,Further, the SEC maintains an internet website atthe www.sec.gov thatwebsite, which contains reports and other registrant information regarding registrants that filefiled electronically with the SEC, including us.SEC.

WeThe 2010 Annual Chief Executive Officer Certification required by the NYSE was submitted our 2009 annual CEO certification with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on July 9, 2009.September 8, 2010. The certification was not qualified in any respect. Additionally, wethe Company has filed with this Form 10-K theAnnual Report principal executive officer and principal financial officer certifications as required under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Information with respect to ourthe Company’s executive officers and directors is incorporated herein by reference to information to be included in the Proxy Statementproxy statement for our 2010Flotek’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

We haveThe Company has disclosed and intend towill continue to disclose any changes or amendments to ourFlotek’s code of ethics oras well as waivers from ourto the code of ethics applicable to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by controllermanagement by posting such changes or waivers on the Company’s website.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 4


Back to our website.Contents

ITEM 1A  Risk Factors

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

This document, our other filings withThe Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to vary materially from current or forecast results. The risks below are not all-inclusive of risks that could impact the SEC, and other materials releasedCompany. Additional risks, not currently known to the public containCompany, or that the Company presently considers immaterial could impact the Company’s business operations.

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995, that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements discuss Company prospects, expected revenue, expenses and profits, strategic initiatives for operations and other activity. Forward-looking statements also contain suppositions regarding future conditions in the oil and natural gas industry within both domestic and international economies. The Company’s results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including risks described below and elsewhere. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements may discuss our prospects, expected revenue, expenses and profits, strategies for our operations and other subjects, including conditions in the oilfield service and oil and natural gas industries and in the United States and international economy in general.Report.

Our forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, but that may not prove to be accurate. All of our forward-looking information is, therefore, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expected. Although it is not possible to identify all factors, these risks and uncertainties include the risk factors discussed below.

Risks Related to Ourthe Company’s Business

We

The Company did not have not had profitable operations during 20092010 and may not be profitable in 2010.2011.

We haveThe Company experienced net losses during the last two fiscalthree calendar years, including a lossnet losses in each of the four quarters of 2009. There2010. The Company can beprovide no assurance that wethe 2011 operational plan (the “2011 Plan”), will be able toexecuted successfully execute our plan of operations for 2010, and that even if we are successful in execution of our plan, that wethe Company will be profitable in 2010.2011.

Demand for thea majority of ourCompany products and services is substantially dependent on the levels of expenditures bywithin the oil and natural gas industry. Current global economic conditions continue to result in low oil and gas prices. If current global economic conditions and the availability of credit worsen or continueoil and natural gas prices materially weaken for an extended period this could reduce ourof time, possible reductions in customers’ levels of expenditures andcould have a significant adverse effect on our revenue, margins and overall operating results.

The current global credit and economic environment has reducedtempered worldwide demand for energy and resulted in depressed crudeenergy. Crude oil and natural gas prices.prices have continued to be volatile. A substantial or extended decline in oil andor natural gas prices can reduce ourcould affect customers’ activitiesspending for products and their spending on our services and products.services. Demand for the majority of ourthe Company’s services substantially depends onis dependent upon the level of expenditures bywithin the oil and gas industry for the exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas reserves. These expendituresExpenditures are sensitive to oil and natural gas prices, and generally dependent onas well as the industry’s view ofoutlook regarding future oil and natural gas prices. During the current worldwide deterioration in the financial and credit markets,Reduced demand for oilCompany products and gas has reduced dramatically and oil and gas prices have fallen, causing some of our customers to reduce or delay their oil and gas exploration and production spending. This has reduced the demand for our services and exerted downward pressure on the prices that we charge.charged in 2009. Limited recovery occurred in 2010. If economic conditions do not continue to improve it could resultor weaken from current levels, additional reductions in further reductions ofcustomer exploration and production expenditures by our customers,could result, causing further declines in thereduced demand for ourCompany products and services and products. This could result in a significant adverse effect on ourthe Company’s operating results. Furthermore, itIt is difficult to predict how long the economic downturnpace of the current recovery, whether the economy will continue, to what extent it might worsen, and to what extent this will continue tocould affect us.the Company.

The reduction inReduced cash flows being experienced by ourflow of some of the Company’s customers resulting from declines inas a result of depressed commodity prices, together withreduced the reduced availability of credit and increased coststhe cost of borrowing due to the tightening of thetight credit markets,markets. Reduced cash flow and capital availability could have significant adverse effects onadversely impact the financial condition of some of our customers. Thisthe Company’s customers, which could result in customer project modifications, delays or cancellations, general business disruptions, and delay in, or nonpayment of, amounts that are owed to us, whichthe Company, that could haveresult in a significant adverse effectnegative impact on ourthe Company’s results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, our suppliers could be negatively impacted by current global economic conditions.

If certain of ourthe Company’s suppliers were to experience significant cash flow issuesconstraints or become insolvent as a result of such conditions, it could result in a reduction or interruption in supplies or a significant increase in the price of supplies could occur, and adversely impact ourthe Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

The pricesprice for oil and natural gas areis subject to a variety of additional factors, including:

demand for energy which is affected byreactive to worldwide population growth, economic development and general economic and business conditions;

the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels for oil;levels;

production of oil and natural gas production by non-OPEC countries;

availability and quantity of natural gas storage;

LNG import volume and pricing;pricing of Liquefied Natural Gas;

pipeline capacity to keycritical markets;

political and economic uncertainty and socio-political unrest;

the level of worldwide oil exploration and production activity;

the cost of exploring for, producingexploration, production and deliveringtransport of oil and natural gas;

technological advances affectingimpacting energy consumption; and

weather conditions.

OurThe Company’s business depends primarily onis dependent upon domestic spending bywithin the oil and natural gas industry, and this spending and our business mayindustry. Spending could be adversely affected by industry conditions or by new or increased governmentgovernmental regulations that are beyond ourthe Company’s control.

We depend primarily on ourThe Company is dependent upon customers’ willingness to make operating and capital expenditures to explore for developexploration, development and produceproduction of oil and natural gas in both the United States.US and abroad. Customers’ expectations of future oil and natural gas market prices for oil and gas maycould curtail spending thereby reducing demand for ourthe Company’s products and services. Industry conditions in the United StatesUS are influenced by numerous factors over which we havethe Company has no control, such asincluding the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, domestic and international economic conditions, political instability in oil and natural gas producing countries and merger and divestiture activity among oil and natural gas producers. The volatility of the oil and natural gas industryprices and the consequentconsequential effect on exploration and production activity could adversely affectimpact the level of activity engaged in by the Company’s customers. One indicator of drilling and production activity by some of our customers. One indication of drilling and production activity and spending is rig count which the company actively monitors to gauge market conditions. A reduction in drilling mayactivity could cause a decline in the demand for, or adverselynegatively affect the price of, ourthe Company’s products and services. Reduced discovery rates of new oil and gas reserves in our market areas could also have a negative long-term impact on our business, even in an environment of stronger oil and gas prices. In addition, domesticDomestic demand for oil and natural gas maycould also be uniquely affected by public attitudesattitude regarding drilling in environmentally sensitive areas, vehicle emissions and other environmental standards, alternative fuels, taxation of oil and gas, andperception of “excess profits” of oil and gas companies, and the potential changesanticipated change in governmental regulationregulations and policy that may result from such public attitudes.policy.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – We may not be ableForm 10-K – 5


Back to generate sufficient cash flows, to meet our debt service obligations or other liquidity needs, and we may not be able to successfully negotiate waivers or a new credit agreement to cure any covenant violations under our current credit agreements.

On several occasions we have failed to meet, or have projected that we would in the future fail to meet, the financial covenant requirements in our bank credit facility. We have been required on these occasions to seek waivers of such covenant violations and amendments to our bank credit facility to modify these covenants. Most recently, we were not in compliance with certain of the financial covenants in our bank credit agreement as of December 31, 2009.

Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to make scheduled payments or mandatory prepayments on our current debt obligations and other future debt obligations we may incur will depend on our future financial performance, which may be affected by a range of economic, competitive, regulatory and

industry factors, many of which are beyond our control. If as a result of our financial performance or other events we violate the financial covenants in our debt agreements or are unable to generate sufficient cash flows or otherwise obtain the funds required to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, we may have to seek waivers of these covenants from our lenders or undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital expenditures or seeking to raise additional capital through the issuance of debt securities or other securities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any required waivers from our lenders or that we will be able to accomplish any necessary refinancing, sale of assets or issuance of securities on terms that are acceptable. Our inability to obtain any required waivers, to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy such obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.Contents

The tightening of the credit markets or a downgrade in our credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs and make it more difficult for us to access funds, to refinance our existing indebtedness, to enter into agreements for new indebtedness or to obtain funding through the issuance of securities. If such conditions were to persist, we would seek alternative sources of liquidity, but may not be able to meet our obligations as they become due.

Our debt agreements also contain representations, warranties, fees, affirmative and negative covenants, and default provisions. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under these agreements. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our debt agreements, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If the lenders accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay our indebtedness. Also, should there be an event of default, or should we need to obtain waivers following an event of default, we may be subject to higher borrowing costs and/or more restrictive covenants in future periods. Acceleration of any obligation under any of our material debt instruments will permit the holders of our other material debt to accelerate their obligations.

On March 31, 2010, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with new lenders which refinanced our existing bank credit facility. The new credit agreement restricts the payment of dividends and does not contain a revolving line of credit facility, however, it does not contain quarterly or annual covenants. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” Note 19 of our consolidated financial statements for a description of our new senior credit facility.

Our new senior credit facility contains certain covenants that could limit ourthe Company’s flexibility and prevent usthe Company from taking certain actions, which could adversely affect ourthe ability to execute ourinitiate certain business strategy.strategies.

Our newThe senior credit facility, as amended, includes a number of significant restrictive covenants. These covenants could adversely affect us by limiting ourthe Company’s ability to plan for or react to market conditions, meet our capital needs and execute our business strategy.strategies. The new senior credit facility contains covenants, that, among other things, limit ourthe Company’s ability, without the consent of the lender, to:

incur certain types and amounts of additional debt;

consolidate, merge, or sell our assets or materially change the nature of ourthe Company’s business;

pay dividends on capital stock andor make restricted payments;

make voluntary prepayments, or materially amend the terms of subordinated debt;

enter into certaindisallowed types of transactions with affiliates;

make certaindisallowed investments;

exceed quantified level of capital expenditures;

make certain capital expenditures; and

incur certain liens.

These covenants may restrict ourthe Company’s operating and financial flexibility andas well as limit ourthe Company’s ability to respondreact in a timely manner to changes in our business or competitive activities. If we fail to comply with these covenants, wecircumstances. Covenant noncompliance could beresult in default and our newof the senior credit facility. Upon such default, the Company’s senior credit facility lenderlenders could elect to declare all the amounts borrowed and due to them, together with

inclusive of all accrued and unpaid interest, to be due and payable. In addition, weAs a result, the Company or one or more of ourits subsidiaries could be forced into liquidation or bankruptcy. Any of the foregoing consequencescircumstances could restrict ourthe Company’s ability to execute ourstrategic business strategy. In addition, suchinitiatives. Any default andor acceleration of our newthe Company’s senior credit facility could lead toresult in a default under ourof the Company’s convertible senior notes.

OurThe Company’s future success and profitability may be adversely affected if wethe Company or ourthe Company’s suppliers fail to develop andand/or introduce new and innovative products and services that appeal to our customers.services.

The oil and natural gas drilling industry is characterized by continual technological developmentsadvancements that have historically resulted in, and will likely will continue to result in, substantial improvements in the scope and quality of oilfield chemicals, drilling and artificial lift products and services and product function and performance. As a result, ourConsequently, the Company’s future success depends,is dependent, in part, upon ourthe Company’s and ourthe Company’s suppliers’ continued ability to timely develop and introduce new and innovative products and services beyond our patented micro-emulsion surfactant lineservices. Increasingly sophisticated customer needs and the ability to address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers andtimely anticipate and respond to technological and industryindustrial advances in the oil and natural gas drilling industry in a timely manner.is critical. If wethe Company or ourthe Company’s suppliers fail to successfully develop and introduce new and innovative products and services that appeal to our customers, or if new market entrants or our competitors offer suchdevelop superior products and services, ourthe Company’s revenue and profitability maycould suffer.

We intendThe Company intends to pursue strategic acquisitions, which could have an adverse impact on ourthe Company’s business.

Our business strategy includes growing our businessThe Company remains committed to growth through strategic acquisitions ofand alliances with complementary businesses as our capital structure permits. Acquisitions that we have made or that we may make in the future may entail a number ofbusinesses. The Company’s historical and potential acquisitions involve risks that could adversely affect ourthe Company’s business climate and results of operations. The processNegotiations of negotiating potential acquisitions or integratingintegration of newly acquired businesses into our business could divert our management’s attention from other business concerns and couldas well as be expensivecost prohibitive and time consuming. Acquisitions could also expose our businessthe Company to unforeseen liabilities or risks associated with entering new markets or businesses. Consequently, we might not be successful in integrating ourUnforeseen operational difficulties related to acquisitions into our existing operations, which maycould result in unforeseen operational difficulties or diminished financial performance or require a disproportionate amount of ourthe Company’s management’s attention and resources. Even if we are successful in integrating ourAdditional acquisitions into our existing operations, we may not derive the benefits, such as operational or administrative synergies, that we expect from such acquisitions, which maycould result in the commitment of capital resources without the realization of anticipated returns on such capital. In addition, we may not be ablereturns. The Company’s current credit agreement limits the Company’s ability to continue to identify attractive acquisition opportunities or successfully acquire identified targets. Competition for acquisition opportunities may escalate, increasing our cost of making further acquisitions or causing us to refrain from makingaccess additional acquisitions. We also must meet certain financial covenants in order to borrow moneyborrowings under our newthe senior credit facility to fund future acquisitions and to borrow forfrom other purposes which, if not met, could prevent us from making future acquisitions.sources.

If we dothe Company does not manage the potential difficulties associated with expansion successfully, ourthe Company’s operating results could be adversely affected.

We haveThe Company has grown over the last several years through internal growth, strategic business/asset acquisitions and strategic acquisitions of other businesses and assets. We believe ouralliances. The Company believes future success depends,will depend, in part, on ourthe Company’s ability to adapt to market opportunities and changes and to successfully integrate the operations of businesses the businesses we acquire.Company acquires. The following factors could presentgenerate business difficulties to our business going forward:

lack of sufficient experienced management personnel;

increased administrative burdens;

customer retention;

technology obsolescencetechnological obsolescence; and

increased infrastructure, technological, communication and logistical problems common toissues associated with large, expansive operations.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 6


Back to Contents

If we do notthe Company fails to manage these potential difficulties successfully, ourincluding increased costs associated with growth, the Company’s operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, we may have difficulties managing the increased costs associated with growth, which could adversely affect our operating margins.

OurThe Company’s ability to grow and compete in the future willcould be adversely affected if adequate capital is not available.

The ability of our businessthe Company to grow and compete dependsis reliant on the availability of adequate capital. Access to capital which in turn dependsis dependent, in large part, on ourthe Company’s cash flowflows from operations and the availability of equity and debt financing. WeThe Company cannot assure you that ourguarantee cash flowflows from operations will be sufficient, or that wethe Company will continue to be able to obtain equity or debt financing on acceptable terms, or at all, in order to implement ourrealize growth strategy. For example, our newstrategies. The Company’s senior credit facility restricts ourthe Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, including borrowings to fund future acquisitions, a key component of our growth strategy.strategies. As a result, wethe Company cannot assure you that adequate capital will be available to finance our currentstrategic growth plans, to take advantage of business opportunities or to respond to competitive pressures, any of which could harm ourthe Company’s business.

OurThe Company’s current insurance policies may not be adequate toadequately protect ourthe Company’s business from all potential risks.

OurThe Company’s operations are subject to hazardsrisks inherent in the oil and natural gas industry, such as, but not limited to, accidents, blowouts, explosions, fires, severe weather, oil and chemical spills and other hazards. These conditions can causeresult in personal injury or loss of life, damage to property, equipment and the environment, andas well as suspension of customer’s oil and gas operations of our customers.operations. Litigation arising from aany catastrophic occurrence at a location where ourthe Company’s equipment, products or services are being used maycould result in ourthe Company being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting large claims. We maintainThe Company maintains insurance coverage that we believeit believes is customary to be customary in the industry againstto mitigate liabilities associated with these hazards. However, we doThe Company does not, however, have insurance against all foreseeable risks, either because insurance is not available or because of high premium costs. In addition, weis cost prohibitive. Further, the Company may not be ablehave the financial wherewithal to maintain adequate insurance coverage in the future at rates we consider reasonable. As a result,future. Consequently, losses and liabilities arising from uninsured or underinsured events could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

We areThe Company is subject to complex foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which expose usthe Company to costs and liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

OurThe Company’s operations are subject to foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to, among other things, the protection of natural resources, and the environment,injury, health and safety considerations, waste management and transportation of waste and other hazardous materials. Our operations, including ourThe Company’s Chemicals and Logistics segment which involves chemical manufacturing, packaging, handling and delivery operations, poseexposes the company to risks of environmental liability that could result in fines, and penalties, expenditures for remediation, and liability for property damage and personal injuries.injury liability. In order to conduct our operations in complianceremain compliant with these laws and regulations, we must obtain and maintainthe Company maintains permits, approvalsauthorizations and certificates as required from various foreign, federal, state and local governmentalregulatory authorities. Sanctions for noncompliance with such laws and regulations maycould include assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, revocation of permits and issuance of corrective action orders. We may

The Company could incur substantial costs in order to maintainensure compliance with these existing laws and regulations. Laws protecting the environment have generally have become more stringent over time and are expected to continue to do so, which could lead toresult in material increases in costs forexpenses associated with future environmental compliance and remediation. In addition, ourThe Company’s costs of compliance maycould also increase if existing laws and regulations are amended or reinterpreted. Such amendments or reinterpretations of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new laws or regulations could curtail exploratory or developmental drilling for and production of oil and natural gas which, in turn, could limit demand for ourthe Company’s products and services. Some environmental laws and regulations may also impose joint and strict liability, which meansmeaning that in somecertain situations wethe Company could be exposed to liability as a result of ourCompany conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior operators or other third parties. Clean-up costsRemediation expense and other damages arising as a result of such laws and regulations could be substantial and have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Material levels of ourthe Company’s revenue are derived from customers that engageengaged in hydraulic fracturing services, a process that creates fractures extending from the well bore through the rock formation to enable natural gas or oil to moveflow more easily through the rock pores to a production well. Bills pending in the United StatesUS House and Senate have asserted that chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect drinking water supplies. The proposed legislation wouldcould require the reporting and public disclosure of chemicalscurrently proprietary chemical formulas used in the fracturing process. This legislation,Legislation, if adopted, could establish an additional level of regulation at the federal level that could lead toresult in operational delays and increased operating costs. The adoption of any future federal or state laws or implementingthe implementation of regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or otherwise limiting, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to completeincrease the difficulty of natural gas and oil wellswell production and could have an adverse impact on ourthe Company’s future results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Regulation of greenhouse gases and climate change could have a negative impact on ourthe Company’s business.

SomeCertain scientific studies have suggested that emissions of certain gases, commonly referred to as greenhouse gases and“greenhouse gases”, including carbon dioxide and methane, may be contributingcontributory to the warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. In response to such studies, the issue of climate change and the effect of greenhouse gas emissions, in particular emissions from fossil fuels, is attracting increasing attention worldwide.worldwide attention. Legislative and regulatory measures to address concerns thatgreenhouse gas emissions of greenhouse gases are contributing to climate change are in various phases of discussions or implementation at the international, national, regional and state levels.

In 2005, the Kyoto Protocol (the “Protocol”) to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which establishes a binding set ofestablished emission targets for greenhouse gases, became binding on thethose countries that had ratified it.the Protocol. In the United States,US, federal legislation imposing restrictions on greenhouse gases is currently under consideration. Proposed legislation has been introduced that would establish an economy-wide cap on emissions of greenhouse gases and would require most sources of greenhouse gas emissions to obtain greenhouse gas emission “allowances” corresponding to their annual emissions. In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) is taking steps that would result in the regulation of greenhouse gases as pollutants under the Clean Air Act. To date, the EPA has issued (i) a “Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases” final rule, effective December 29, 2009, which establishes a new comprehensive scheme requiringrequires operators of stationary sources in the United StatesUS emitting more than established annual thresholds of carbon dioxide-equivalent greenhouse gases to inventory and report their greenhouse gas emissions annually; and (ii) an “Endangerment Finding” final rule, effective January 14, 2010, which states that current and projected concentrations of six keyidentified greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, as well as emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines threaten public health and welfare, allowing the EPA to finalize motor vehiclewelfare. Final greenhouse gas standards (the effect of which could reduce the demand for motor fuels refined from crude oil). Finally, accordingoil. According to the EPA, the final motor vehicle greenhouse gas standards will trigger construction and operating permit requirements for large stationary sources. As a result, the EPA has proposed to tailor these programs such that only large stationary sources will be required to have air permits that authorize greenhouse gas emissions.

Existing or future laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements related to greenhouse gases and climate change, including incentives to conserve energy conservation or use alternative energy sources,incentives, could have a negative impact on ourthe Company’s operations if, such laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements reduce theas a result, there is a reduction in worldwide demand for oil and natural gas or otherwise result in reducedglobal economic activity generally. In addition, such laws, regulations, treaties or international agreementsactivity. Other results could result inbe increased compliance costs orand additional operating restrictions, each of which maywould have a negative impact on ourthe Company’s operations. In addition to potential impacts on ourLastly, the Company’s operations directly or indirectly resulting from climate-change legislation or regulations, our operations also could be negatively affectedimpacted by climate-change related physical changes or changes in weather patterns.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 7


Back to Contents

If we arethe Company is unable to adequately protect ourits intellectual property rights or areis found to infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others ourthe Company’s business is likely to be adversely affected.

We relyThe Company relies on a combination of patents, trademarks, non-disclosure agreements and other security measures to establish and protect ourthe Company’s intellectual property rights. Although we believethe Company believes that thoseexisting measures are reasonably adequate to protect our intellectual property and provide for the continued operation of our business,rights there can be

is no assurance that the measures we have taken or may take in the future, will prevent misappropriation of our proprietary information, or provide usthe Company with a competitive advantage, or thatdissuade others will not independently developfrom independent development of similar products or services, design around our proprietary or patented technology or duplicate our products or services. Moreover, there can beis no assurance that these protectionsthe Company will be available in all cases or will be adequateable to prevent our competitors from copying, reverse engineering or otherwise obtaining and using ourthe Company’s technology, proprietary rights or products. We haveThe Company has not sought foreign protection corresponding to all of our US intellectual property rights. Consequently, wethe Company may not be able to enforce all of our intellectual property rights outside of the United States.US. Furthermore, the laws of certain countries in which ourthe Company’s products are manufactured or marketed may not protect ourthe Company’s proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. ThirdUS. Finally, parties may seek to challenge, invalidate or circumvent ourthe Company’s patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. In each case, ourthe Company’s ability to compete could be significantly impaired.

In addition, someA portion of ourthe Company’s products are not protected by issued patents.without patent protection. The issuance of a patent does not guarantee that it is validvalidity or enforceable, so even if we obtainenforceability, accordingly, Company patents they may not be valid or enforceable against third parties. The issuance of a patent does not guarantee that we havethe Company has the right to practiceuse the patented invention. Third parties may have blocking patents that could be used to prevent usthe Company from marketing ourthe Company’s own patented productproducts and practicing our ownutilizing the patented technology.

We have from timeThe Company is exposed to time received, and may in the future receive, communications alleging possible infringementallegations of patentspatent and other intellectual property rights of others.infringement. Furthermore, we have in the past, and may in the future,Company could become involved in costly litigation or proceedings brought against us regarding patents or other intellectual property rights. If any such claims are asserted against us, we maythe Company, the Company could seek to obtain a license under the third party’s intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that we will be ablerights in order to obtain all of the necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all.mitigate exposure. In the event that wethe Company cannot obtain a license, theseaffected parties maycould file lawsuits against usthe Company seeking damages (potentially including(including treble damages), or an injunction against the sale of ourthe Company’s products that incorporate allegedly incorporating infringed intellectual property or against the operation of ourthe Company’s business as presentlycertain conducted which couldwould result in ourthe Company having to stopcease the sale of some of our products, increase the costscost of selling some of our products, or causeresult in damage to ourthe Company’s reputation. The award of damages, including material royalty payments, or the entry of an injunction order against the manufacture and sale of some or allany of ourthe Company’s products, could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s results of operations and ability to compete.

WeThe Company and ourthe Company’s customers are subject to risks associated with doing business outside of the United States which may expose us toUS including political risk, foreign exchange risk and other uncertainties.

Revenue from the sale of products to customers outside the United States exceeds 5%US exceeded 13% of ourthe Company’s total 2010 annual revenue. WeThe Company and ourits customers are subject to certain risks inherent in doing business outside of the United States,US, including:

governmental instability;

war and other international conflicts,;conflicts;

civil and labor disturbances;

requirements of local ownership;

partial or total expropriation or nationalization;

currency devaluation; and

foreign exchange control and foreign laws and policies, each of which may limit the movement of assets or funds or result in the deprivation of contract rights or the takingappropriation of property without fair compensation.

Collections and recovery of rental tools from international customers and agents may also prove more difficult due to theinherent uncertainties of foreign law and judicial procedure. We may thereforeThe Company could experience significant difficulty resulting fromwith collections or recovery due to the political or judicial climate in foreign countries in which we operateit operates or in which ourthe Company’s products are used.

OurThe Company’s international operations must also complybe compliant with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and other applicable United StatesUS laws, and wethe Company could bebecome liable under these laws for actions taken by our employees or agents. In addition, from time to time, the United States has passedCompliance with international laws and imposedregulations could become more complex and expensive thereby creating increased risk as the Company’s international business portfolio grows. Further, the US periodically enacts laws and imposes regulations prohibiting or restricting trade with certain nations, and the United Statesnations. The US government could also change these laws or enact new laws that could restrict or prohibit usthe Company from doing business in certainidentified foreign countries.

Although most of ourthe Company’s international revenue is derived from transactions denominated in United StatesUS dollars, we havethe Company has conducted, and likely will continue to conduct, some business in currencies other than the United StatesUS dollar. WeThe Company currently dodoes not hedge against foreign currency fluctuations. Accordingly, ourthe Company’s profitability could be affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. We haveThe Company has no assurancecontrol over and can provide no assurances that future laws and regulations will not materially adversely affect ourimpact the Company’s ability to conduct international business.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 8


Back to Contents

The loss of certain key customers could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s results of operations and could result in a decline in ourthe Company’s revenue.

We areThe Company is dependent on severala few key customers. During each of the three previous years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, over 20%18%, 22% and 26%, respectively, of ourthe Company’s consolidated revenues camerevenue was derived from three of our customers. OurThe Company’s customer relationships are typicallyhistorically governed by purchase orders or other short-term contracts rather than long-term contracts. The loss of one or more of ourthese key customers could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s results of operations and could result in a decline in ourthe Company’s revenue.

The loss of certain key suppliers, ourthe Company’s inability to secure raw materials on a timely basis, or ourthe Company’s inability to pass commodity price increases on to our customers could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s ability to service our customer’s needs and could result in a loss of customers.

We believe that materials and componentsMaterials used in our servicing and manufacturing operations andas well as those purchased for sale are generally available on the open market and from multiple sources. Acquisition and transportation of these raw materials to ourthe Company’s facilities however, can be adversely affectedimpacted by extreme weather conditions. However, certainCertain raw materials used by the Chemical and LogisticsChemicals segment in the manufacture of our patented micro-emulsion chemical sales are only available from limited sources and any disruptions to ourthese suppliers could materially impact ourthe Company’s sales. The prices we paythe Company pays for our raw materials maycould be affected by, among other things, energy, steel and other commodity prices; tariffs and duties on imported materials; foreign currency exchange rates; phases of the general business cycle and global demand.

The Drilling Products and Artificial Lift segments purchase their principalcritical raw materials and steel on the open market and, where we can, we useable, from multiple suppliers, both domesticdomestically and international, for our key raw materials purchases.internationally.

We also keepThe Company maintains a three-three to six-monthsix month supply of keycritical mud-motor inventory parts that we sourcethe Company sources from China. This inventory stock position approximates the lead time required to secure these parts thus potentially avoidingin order to avoid disruption of service to ourthe Company’s customers. OurThe Company’s inability to secure these key componentsreasonably priced critical inventory parts in a timely manner at reasonable prices could adversely affect ourthe Company’s ability to service our customers. We sourceThe Company sources the vast majority of our motor parts from a single supplier. As part of ourthe 2011 business plan, we are diligentlythe Company is actively working to identify and develop relationships with backupback-up parts suppliers. If we are unsuccessful in developing these relationships, we mayidentifying and engaging back-up suppliers, the Company could be exposed to a disruption of key suppliessuppliers that could result in a loss of revenuesrevenue or key customers. Additionally, if ourthe customers were to seek or develop alternative approachesalternatives for the products or services we offer, wethe Company offers, the Company could suffer a decline in revenue and loss of key customers.

WeThe Company currently dodoes not hedge our commodity prices. WeThe Company may not be ableunable to pass along price increases to ourits customers, which could result in a decline in revenue or operating profit.

profits.

OurThe Company’s inability to develop new products or differentiate ourexisting products could have a material adverse effect on ourthe ability to service ourbe responsive to customer’s needs and could result in a loss of customers.

OurThe Company’s ability to compete inwithin the oilfield services marketbusiness is dependent on ourupon the ability to differentiate our products and services, provide superior quality and service, and maintain a competitive cost structure. Activity levels in our three segmentsthe Company’s operations are driven primarily by current and expectedforecast commodity prices, drilling rig count, oil and natural gas production levels, and customer capital spending allocated for drilling and production. The regions in which we operatethe Company operates are highly competitive. Additionally, the continued depressed economy has resulted in the market for our services and that of our competitors to remain contracted. ManyThe Company is also smaller than many other oil and natural gas service companies areand has fewer resources as compared to these competitors. The larger than we are and have greater resources than we have. These competitors are better ablepositioned to withstand industry downturns, compete on the basis of price and acquire new equipment and technologies, all of which could affect ourthe Company’s revenue and profitability. These competitors compete with usThe Company competes for both for customers and for acquisitions of other businesses. This competition may result in pressureacquisition opportunities. Competition could adversely affect on ourthe Company’s operating profit. We believeThe Company believes that competition for our products and services will continue to be intense in the foreseeable future.

If we losethe Company loses the services of key members of our management, wethe Company may not be able to manage our operations and implement our growth strategy effectively.strategies.

We dependThe Company depends on the continued service of our Interimthe President, ourthe Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategic Planning, and ourthe Executive Vice President of Operations, Business Development and Special Projects and the Chief Accounting Officer, who possess significant expertise and knowledge of ourthe Company’s business and industry. We doFurther, the President serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Company does not carry key man life insurance on any of these executives. Additionally, we have in placeexecutives at December 31, 2010. The Company has entered into employment agreements with our Interimthe President, and ourthe Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategic Planning.Planning, the Executive Vice President of Operations, Business Development and Special Projects and the Chief Accounting Officer. Any loss or interruption of the services of these or other key members of ourthe Company’s management could significantly reduce ourthe Company’s ability to manage our operations effectively and implement ourstrategic business plan and strategy, and we cannot assure youinitiatives. The Company can provide no assurance that we would be able to find appropriate replacements for key positions could be found should the need arise.

Failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on ourthe Company’s operations and the trading price of ourthe Company’s common stock.

Effective internal controls are necessary for usthe Company to provide reliable financial reports, effectively prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. If wethe Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or effectively prevent fraud, ourthe Company’s reputation and operating results could be harmed. If we arethe Company is unable to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, wethe Company may not be able to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, which, in turn could harm ouraffect the operating results or cause usthe Company to fail to meet ourCompany’s reporting obligations. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negativenegatively effect on the trading price of ourthe Company’s common stock, limit ourthe ability to access the capital markets in the future and require us to incurthe incurrence of additional costs to improve our internal control systems and procedures.

At December 31, 2009, we reported that we identified control deficiencies that constituted a material weakness in connection with preparation of our financial statements. We

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 9


Back to Contents

The Company did not maintain an effective control environment during 2009. We have implemented remediation efforts to address2009 and consequently identified control deficiencies that constituted material deficiencies in connection with preparation of the Company’s 2009 financial statements. The Company has concluded that while certain previously identified material weaknessdeficiencies related to internal controls have been remediated as of December 31, 2010 the material deficiencies still exist within the Company’s control environment, disclosure controls and procedures remain ineffective.

The Company has implemented on-going remediation and internal control improvement initiatives order to identify material weaknesses and to enhance ourthe overall financial control environment. We cannot assure youThe Company’s management continues to be actively committed to and engaged in the implementation and execution of remediation efforts to identify and resolve any material weaknesses. The executive management team is committed to achieving and maintaining a strong control environment, high ethical standards, and financial reporting integrity. There can, however, be no assurance that ourthe Company’s remediation efforts will be successful.

WeFailure to timely file accurate reports with the SEC could have an adverse effect on the trading price of the Company’s common stock and the ability to raise capital in the capital markets.

The Company did not file ourthe March 31, 2010 Quarterly ReportsReport on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2009 in a timely manner. WeThe Company filed requestsa request for an extension of time to file these reports and subsequently filed ourthe referenced Form 10-Qs10-Q within the extension period. A failure to timely file ourSEC reports timely with the SEC willcould result in ourthe Company’s inability to file registration statements using any registration form other than Form S-1, which is more time consuming and costly to prepare, for a period of time. This limitation, if realized, mayprepare. Filing limitations could also hamper ourthe Company’s ability to raise capital in the financial markets. Additionally, the late filing of reports with the SEC wouldcould result in a technical default of ourthe Company’s various debt obligations.

The Company restated the Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009 to reclassify warrants from stockholders’ equity to warrant liability and to recognize changes in the fair value of the a warrant liability in the statement of operations.

Risks Related to Ourthe Company’s Industry

The extension

Uncertainty regarding the pace of recovery from the worldwiderecent recession could continue to have an adverse effect on exploration and production activity and result in lower demand for our servicesthe Company’s products and products.services.

The currentRecent worldwide financial and credit crisis uncertainty has reduced the availability of liquidity and credit markets to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The shortage of liquidity and credit combined with continued losses and/or depressed conditions in thepressure on worldwide equity markets could continue to extendimpact the worldwide economic recession. Sluggish economic activity caused byclimate. Unrest in the current sustained recession continues to maintain worldwideMiddle East may also impact demand for energy at depressed levels resulting in low oilthe Company’s products and natural gas prices. Forecasted crude oil prices for 2010 have not improved significantly. services both domestically and internationally.

Demand for ourthe Company’s products and services and products dependsis dependent on oil and natural gas industry activity and expenditure levels that are directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas prices. Demand for ourthe Company’s products and services and products is particularly sensitive to the levellevels of exploration, development, and production activity of, and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and natural gas companies, including national oil companies. One indication of drilling and production activity and spending is rig count, which we monitorthe Company monitors to gauge market conditions. Any prolonged reduction in oil and natural gas prices or drop in rig count willcould depress the immediatecurrent levels of exploration, development, and production activity. Perceptions of longer-term lower oil and natural gas prices by oil and natural gas companies cancould similarly reduce or defer major expenditures given the long-term nature of many large-scale development projects. Lower levels of activity could result in a corresponding decline in the demand for ourthe Company’s oil and natural gas well servicesproducts and products,services, which could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s revenue and profitability.

Continuation of the global credit crisis could have an adverse impact on ourthe Company’s customers and on ourthe Company’s dealings with lenders, insurers and financial institutions.

Events in the global credit markets over the past several years have significantly impacted the availability of credit and associated financing costs for many of ourthe Company’s customers. ManyA significant portion of ourthe Company’s customers finance their drilling and production programs through third-party lenders. The reduced availability andLack of available credit or increased costs of borrowing could cause our customers to reduce their spending on drilling programs, thereby reducing demand and potentially resulting in lower prices for ourthe Company’s products and services. Also, the current credit and economic environment could significantly impact the financial condition of some customers over a prolonged period, of time, leading to business disruptions and restricting theirrestricted ability to pay us for services performed, which could negatively impact our results of operationsthe Company’s products and cash flows. In addition, an increasing number of financial institutions and insurance companies have reported significant deterioration in their financial condition. Ourservices. The Company’s forward-looking statements assume that ourthe Company’s lenders, insurers and other financial institutions will be able to fulfill their obligations under our various credit agreements, insurance policies and contracts. If any of ourthe Company’s significant financial institutions werelenders, insurers and others are unable to perform under such agreements, and if we werethe Company was unable to find suitable replacements at a reasonable cost, ourthe Company’s results of operations, liquidity and cash flows could be adversely impacted.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 10


Back to Contents

A prolonged period of prolonged depressed oil and natural gas prices maycould result in reduced demand for ourthe Company’s products and services which mayand adversely affect ourthe Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The markets for oil and natural gas have historically been extremely volatile. Such volatility in oil and natural gas prices, or the perception by ourthe Company’s customers of unpredictability in oil and natural gas prices, could adversely affects theaffect spending patterns in our industry. In some circumstances this volatility may continue to prolong depressed oil and gas prices. We anticipatewithin targeted industries. The Company anticipates that our current markets will continue to be volatile in the future and may continue to prolong depressed oil and gas prices.future. The demand for ourthe Company’s products and services is, in large part, driven by current and anticipated oil and natural gas prices and the related general levels of production spending and drilling activity. In particular, depressed oil and natural gas prices maycould cause a decline in exploration and drilling activities. This, in turn, could result in lower demand for ourthe Company’s products and services and may causecould result in lower prices for ourthe Company’s products and services. As a result, aA prolonged decline in oil or natural gas prices maycould adversely affect ourthe Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competition from newNew and existing competitors within ourthe Company’s industry could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

The oil and natural gas industry is highly competitive and fragmented. OurThe Company’s principal competitors include numerous small companies capable of competing effectively in ourthe Company’s markets on a local basis, as well as a number of large companies that possess substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. Our largerdoes the Company. Larger competitors may be able to devote greater resources to developing, promoting and selling their products and services. WeThe Company may also face increased competition due to the entry of new competitors including current suppliers that decide to sell their products and services directly to ourthe Company’s customers. As a result of this competition, we maythe Company could experience lower sales or greater operating costs, which maycould have an adverse effect on ourthe Company’s margins and results of operations.

OurThe Company’s industry has experienced a high rate of employee turnover. Any difficulty we experienceDifficulty attracting or retaining personnel or agents could adversely affect ourthe Company’s business.

We operateThe Company operates in an industry that has historically been highly competitive in securing qualified personnel with the required technical skills and experience. OurThe Company’s services require skilled personnel who canable to perform physically demanding work. Due to industry volatility and the demanding nature of the work, workers maycould choose to pursue employment in fieldsopportunities that offer a more desirable work environment at wages that are competitive with ours.the Company’s. As a result, wethe Company may not be able to find enoughqualified labor, to meet our needs, which could limit our growth.the Company’s growth ability. In addition, the cost of attracting and retaining qualified personnel has increased over the past several years due to competition, and we expect itcompetitive pressures. The Company expects labor costs will continue to increase in the foreseeable future. In order to attract and retain qualified personnel wethe Company may be required to offer increased wages and benefits. If we are not ablethe Company is unable to increase the prices of our products and services to compensate for increases in compensation, or if we areis unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Severe weather could have a material adverse impact on ourthe Company’s business.

OurThe Company’s business could be materially and adversely affected by severe weather.weather conditions. Hurricanes, tropical storms, blizzards, and cold weather and other severe weather hazards may cause theconditions could result in curtailment of services, damagesdamage to our equipment and facilities, interruptionsinterruption in the transportation of our products and materials in accordance with contract schedules and loss of productivity. If ourthe Company’s customers are unable to operate or are required to reduce their operations due to severe weather conditions, and as a result curtail the purchases of ourthe Company’s products and services, ourthe Company’s business could be materially adversely affected.

A terrorist attack or armed conflict could harm ourthe Company’s business.

Terrorist activities, anti-terrorist efforts and other armed conflictconflicts involving the United States mayUS could adversely affect the United StatesUS and global economies and could prevent usthe Company from meeting our financial and other obligations. We mayThe Company could experience loss of business, delays or defaults in payments from payers,payors, or disruptions of fuel supplies and markets if pipelines, production facilities, processing plants andor refineries are direct targets or indirect casualties of an act of terror or war. In addition, suchSuch activities could reduce the overall demand for oil and natural gas which, in turn, could also reduce the demand for ourthe Company’s products and services. We haveThe Company has implemented certain security measures in response to the threat of terrorist activities. Terrorist activities and the threat of potential terrorist activities and any resulting economic downturn could adversely affect ourthe Company’s results of operations, impair ourthe ability to raise capital or otherwise adversely impact ourthe Company’s ability to execute ourrealize certain business strategy.strategies.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 11


Back to Contents

Risks Related to Ourthe Company’s Securities

The market price of ourthe Company’s common stock has been and may continue to be volatile.

The market price of ourthe Company’s common stock has historically been subject to significant fluctuations. The following factors, among others, could cause the price of ourthe Company’s common stock in the public market to fluctuate significantly:

variations in ourthe Company’s quarterly results of operations;

changes in market valuations of companies in ourthe Company’s industry;

fluctuationfluctuations in stock market prices and volume;

fluctuationfluctuations in oil and natural gas prices;

issuanceissuances of common stock or other securities in the future;

the additionadditions or departuredepartures of key personnel; and

announcements by usthe Company or ourthe Company’s competitors of new business, acquisitions or joint ventures.

The stock market has experienced extremeunusual price and volume fluctuations in recent years that have significantly affected the pricesprice of the common stock of many companies including companies in ourwithin the oil and natural gas industry. TheFurther changes can occur without regard to specific operating performance. The price of ourthe Company’s common stock could continue to fluctuate based upon factors that have little to do with our company,the Company’s operational performance, and these fluctuations could materially reduce ourthe Company’s stock price. Class action lawsuits have frequentlyhistorically been brought against companies following periods of volatility in thecommon stock market price of their common stock. Currently, we have beenvolatility. The Company could be named in a legal case of this type, which could be expensive and divert management’s attention and company resources, andas well as have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

An active market for ourthe Company’s common stock may not continue to exist or may not continue to exist at current trading levels.

Trading volume for ourthe Company’s common stock has historically been low when compared to companies with larger market capitalizations. WeThe Company cannot assure youpresume that an active trading market for ourthe Company’s common stock will developcontinue or be sustained. Sales of significant amounts of shares of ourthe Company’s common stock in the public market could lower the market price of ourthe Company’s stock.

If we dothe Company does not meet the New York Stock exchangeExchange continued listing requirements, ourthe Company’s common stock may be delisted, which could have an adverse impact on the liquidity and market price of ourthe Company’s common stock.

OurThe Company’s common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). UnderNYSE. In accordance with the NYSE’s continued listing standards, a company is considered to be below compliance standards if, among other things, (i) both itsa Company’s average global market capitalization is less than $50 million over a 30 trading-day period and itsa company’s stockholders’ equity is less than $50 million; (ii) itsa company’s average global market capitalization is less than $15 million over a 30 trading-day period, which willwould result in immediate initiation of suspension procedures; or (iii) thea company’s average closing price of a listed security is less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day period. We haveThe Company previously received notification from the NYSE that we areit was not in compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing requirements because both ourthe 30 trading-day average global market capitalization and our last reportedthe Company’s stockholders’ equity were below the respective $50 million requirements.

When a listed company’s stock falls below the market capitalization and stockholders’ equity standard, a company is considered “below criteria,” andhowever, the company is permitted to submit a business plan demonstrating its ability to return to compliance with these continued listing standards within 18 months of receipt of the NYSE notification. We haveThe Company submitted a plan of action to the NYSE in March 2010, which we believethe Company believes will allow usprovide the ability to, once again, achieve compliance with the minimum listing requirements of the NYSEby no later than June 28, 2011.2011 with the minimum listing requirements. During the plan implementation process, ourthe Company’s common stock will continuecontinues to be listed on the NYSE, subject to ourthe Company’s compliance with other NYSE continued listing requirements. On March 29, 2010, the NYSE agreed to accept ourthe Company’s plan of action.

If ourthe Company’s shares of common stock are delisted from the NYSE and we arethe Company is unable to list our shares of common stock on another U.S.US national or regional securities exchange or have our shares of common stock quoted on an established over-the-counter trading market in the United StatesUS within 30 days we willof being delisted, the Company could be required to make an offer to repurchase all of ourthe Company’s outstanding convertible notes at a price ofequal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus any accrued and unpaid interest. We may not have sufficient fundsWere this to payoccur the purchase price forCompany could lack the financial wherewithal to fund the repurchase of any convertible notes that are tendered to us if we are required to make this offer to repurchase.

tendered.

A delistingDelisting of ourthe Company’s common stock could also negatively impact usthe Company by: (i) reducing the liquidity and market price of ourthe Company’s common stock; (ii) reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire ourthe Company’s common stock, which could negativelyand correspondingly impact ourthe Company’s ability to raise equity financing; and (iii) decreasing the amount of news and analyst coverage for us.the Company. In addition, we maythe Company could experience other adverse effects, including, without limitation, the loss of confidence in usthe Company by current and prospective suppliers, customers, employees and others with whom we havethe Company has or may seek to initiate business relationships, and ourthe Company’s ability to attract and retain personnel by means of equity compensation could be impaired.compensation.

We haveThe Company has no plans to pay dividends on ourthe Company’s common stock, and, therefore, investors will have to look to stock appreciation for return on their investments.

We doThe Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on ourthe Company’s common stock in the foreseeable future. WeThe Company currently intendintends to retain all future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business.the Company’s business and to meet current debt obligations. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of ourthe Company’s board of directors and will depend on, among other things, ourthe Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends and other considerations thatdeemed relevant by the board of directors deems relevant.directors. Certain covenants of our newthe Company’s senior credit facility restrict the payment of dividends without the prior written consent of the lender.lenders. Investors must rely on sales of their common stock held after price appreciation, which may never occur, in order to realize a return on their investment.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 12


Back to Contents

Certain anti-takeover provisions of ourthe Company’s charter documents and underapplicable Delaware law could discourage or prevent others from acquiring our company,the Company, which may adversely affect the market price of ourthe Company’s common stock.

OurThe Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that:

permit usthe Company to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 100,000 shares of preferred stock, in one or more series and, with respect to each series, to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of the series;

prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings;

limit the ability of shareholders to act by written consent;

prohibit cumulative voting; and

require advance notice for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to the board of directors to be acted upon at meetings of stockholders.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law limits business combinations with owners of more than 15% of ourthe Company’s stock that have not been approved bywithout the approval of the board of directors. TheseAforementioned provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us withoutthe Company exclusive of negotiation. OurThe Company’s board of directors could choose not to negotiate with an acquirer that it diddeemed not feel was in ourbeneficial to or synergistic with the Company’s strategic interest.outlook. If thean acquirer were discouraged from offering to acquire usthe Company or prevented from successfully completing a hostile acquisition by thereferenced anti-takeover measures, youshareholders could lose the opportunity to sell yourowned shares at a favorable price.

Future issuance of additional shares of our common stock could cause dilution of ownership interests and adversely affect ourthe Company’s stock price.

WeThe Company may, in the future, issue our previously authorized and unissued shares of common stock, resultingwhich would result in the dilution of thecurrent stockholders ownership interests of our current stockholders. We areinterests. The Company is currently authorized to issue 80,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 24,168,29244,417,382 were issued as of December 31, 2009.March 7, 2011. Additional shares are subject to future issuance through the exercise of options previously granted under ourvarious equity compensation plans or through the exercise of options that are still available for future grant.equity grants. The potential

issuance of such additional shares of common stock, whether directly or pursuant to any conversion right of our

associated with the convertible senior notes or convertible preferred stock or other convertible securities including our convertible preferred stock, we may issue inof the future,Company, or through exercise of outstanding warrants may create downward pressure on the trading price of ourthe Company’s common stock. WeThe Company may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock for raisingin order to raise capital or effectuate other business purposes. Future sales of substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that sales could occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of ourthe Company’s common stock.

On March 31, 2010, in connection with the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement related to our new senior credit facility, we issued 3,431,133 shares of common stock to pay a portion of the commitment fee due at closing. On March 31, 2010, in connection with the Exchange Agreement involving our senior convertible notes, we expect to issue up to 1,568,867 shares of common stock to satisfy the common stock component of the exchange.

WeThe Company may issue additional shares of preferred stock or debt securities with greater rights than our common stock.

In August 2009, we sold convertible preferred stock with warrants to purchase additional shares of our common stock. Holders of the convertible preferred stock may convert their preferred shares into shares of our common stock at any time, and we may automatically convert the preferred shares into our common shares if certain conditions relating to the closing price of our common stock are met after February 12, 2010. All warrants are exercisable as of December 31, 2009. The convertible preferred stock and warrants have the right to acquire a total of 17,436,512 shares of ourCompany’s common stock.

Subject to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, ourNYSE, the Company’s certificate of incorporation authorizes ourthe board of directors to issue one or more additional series of preferred stock and to set the terms of the preferred stockissuance without seeking any further approval from holders of our common stock. Currently, there are 100,000 preferred shares authorized, withof which 16,000 shares issued.were originally issued, of which no shares remain outstanding at March 7, 2011. Any preferred stock that is issued may rank senior to our common stock in terms of dividends, priority and liquidation premiums, and may have greater voting rights than holders of ourcommon stock. All outstanding warrants are exercisable as of December 31, 2010.

The Company’s ability to use net operating loss carryforwards and tax attribute carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be limited as a result of transactions involving the Company’s common stock.

Also, holdersUnder section 382 of our convertible senior notes are preferred in rightthe Internal Revenue Code of payment1986, as amended, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on the holders of our preferredCompany’s ability to utilize pre-change net operating losses (“NOLs”), and common stock.

On March 31, 2010, in connection with the Exchange Agreement, we expectcertain other tax attributes to exchange $40 million of convertible senior notes foroffset future taxable income. In general, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate considerationstock ownership of $36 millioncertain stockholders increases by more than 50 percentage points over such stockholders’ lowest percentage ownership during the testing period (generally three years). An ownership change could limit the Company’s ability to utilize NOLs and tax attribute carryforwards for taxable years including or following an identified “ownership change.” Transactions involving the Company’s common stock, even those outside the Company’s control, such as purchases or sales by investors, within the testing period, could result in new convertible senior secured notesan “ownership change”. Limitations imposed on the ability to use NOLs and $2 milliontax credits to offset future taxable income could require the Company to pay US federal income taxes in sharesexcess of our common stock.that which would otherwise be required if such limitations were not in effect. NOLs and tax attributes could expire unused, in each instance reducing or eliminating the benefit of the NOLs and tax attributes. Similar rules and limitations may apply for state income tax purposes.

Disclaimer of Obligation to Update

Except as required by applicable law or regulation, we assumethe Company assumes no obligation (and specifically disclaimdisclaims any such obligation) to update these Risk Factors or any other forward-looking statementsstatement contained in this Annual Report to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2.Properties.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 13


Back to Contents

ITEM 1B  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 2  Properties

As of February 28, 2010, we operated 392011, the Company operates 34 manufacturing and warehouse facilities in nine U.S.seven states. We own 13The Company owns 12 of these facilities. The remaining facilities with the remainder beingare leased with initial lease terms that expireexpiring at various yearsdates through 2032. In addition, ourThe Company’s corporate office is a leased facility located in Houston, Texas. The following table sets forth thefacility locations of these facilities:

:

Segment

SegmentOwned/Leased

Owned/Leased

Location

Chemicals

Chemicals and Logistics

Leased

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Raceland, Louisiana

Norman, Oklahoma

Marlow, Oklahoma

Owned

Owned

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Carthage, Texas

Wheeler, Texas

Raceland, Louisiana

Pocola, Oklahoma

Wilburton, Oklahoma

The Woodlands, Texas

Drilling Products

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Chickasha, Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Houston, Texas

Mason, Texas

Midland, Texas

Robstown, Texas

Owned

Owned

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Leased

Vernal, Utah

Evanston, Wyoming

Grand Junction, Colorado

Bossier City, Louisiana

Lafayette, Louisiana (2 locations)

Shreveport, Louisiana

Farmington, New Mexico

Tioga, North Dakota

Corpus Christi, Texas

Granbury, Texas

Grand Prairie, Texas

Houston, Texas

Midland, Texas (3 locations)

Odessa, Texas

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Towanda, Pennsylvania

Casper, Wyoming

Artificial Lift

Owned

Leased

Leased

Gillette, Wyoming

Farmington, New Mexico

Houston, Texas

General Corporate

Leased

Leased

Houston, Texas

We consider ourThe Company considers all facilities to be in good condition and suitable forto the safe conduct of our business.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 14


Back to Contents

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

Class Action LitigationITEM 3  Legal Proceedings

On August 7, 2009, a class action suit was commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between May 8, 2007 and January 23, 2008, inclusive, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Litigation

The complaint alleges that, throughout the time period indicated, we failed to disclose material adverse facts about our true financial condition, business and prospects. Specifically, the complaint alleges that as a result of the failure to disclose the adverse facts, our positive statements concerning guidance and prospects were lacking in a reasonable basis at all relevant times. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on February 4, 2010 alleging misleading statements and material omissions in connection with our earnings guidance for 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2007. The amended complaint does not quantify the alleged actual damages.

Since August 7, 2009, several other class action suits have been commenced by others concerning the foregoing matters.

We intend to mount a vigorous defense to these claims. Discovery has not yet commenced. At this time, we are unable to reasonably estimate the outcome of this litigation.

Other Litigation

We areCompany is subject to routine litigation and other claims that arise in the normal course of business. We areManagement is not aware of any pending or threatened lawsuits or proceedings which would have a material effect on ourthe Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

ITEM 4  (Removed and Reserved)

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 15


Back to Contents

Item 4.Reserved.

PART II    

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

OurITEM 5  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock is listedbegan trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)NYSE on December 27, 2007 under the stock ticker symbol “FTK.” As of the close of business on March 16, 2010,7, 2011, there were 24,215,28343,034,446 shares of common stock outstanding held by approximately 10,0006,000 holders of record. The last reported salesales price of the common stock on the NYSE on March 16, 20107, 2011 was $1.43.$6.30.

As of December 27, 2007, our common stock began trading on the NYSE under the stock ticker symbol “FTK.” The following table sets forth, on a per share basis for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices of our common stock as reported by the NYSE. These prices do not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions.

Fiscal 2010

Common Stock Closing Sales Price,
per share

High

Low

4th Quarter

$

5.75

$

1.40

3rd Quarter

$

1.73

$

1.01

2nd Quarter

$

2.24

$

1.16

1st Quarter

$

1.90

$

1.20

Fiscal 2009

High

Low

4th Quarter

$

2.41

$

0.96

3rd Quarter

$

2.59

$

1.38

2nd Quarter

$

3.30

$

1.23

1st Quarter

$

5.00

$

1.21

Fiscal 2008

      High          Low    

4th Quarter

  $10.68  $1.88

3rd Quarter

  $20.95  $10.36

2nd Quarter

  $22.82  $15.30

1st Quarter

  $36.07  $14.52

We haveThe Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. While wethe Company regularly assess ourassesses the dividend policy, we havethe Company has no current plans to declare a dividenddividends on common stock, and we intendintends to continue to use our earnings and other cash in the maintenance and expansion of ourthe business. In addition, our newFurther, the Company’s senior credit facility contains provisions that limit ourthe Company’s ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 16


Back to Contents

Stock Performance Graph

The performance graph below illustrates a five year comparison of cumulative total returns based on an initial investment of $100 in ourthe Company’s common stock, as compared with the Russell 2000 Index and the Philadelphia Oil ServicesService Index for the period 2005annual 2006 through 2009.2010 periods. The performance graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 20042005 in each of ourthe Company’s common stock, the Russell 2000 Index and the Philadelphia Oil Service Index, and that any and all dividends were reinvested.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Assumes Initial Investment of $100

   Years Ended December 31,
   2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009

Flotek Industries, Inc.

  $100  $434  $652  $1,676  $117  $62

Russell 2000 Index

  $100  $105  $124  $122  $81  $103

Philadelphia Oil Service Index (OSX)

  $100  $150  $171  $251  $102  $166




2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Flotek Industries, Inc.

$

100

$

150

$

387

$

27

$

14

$

58

Russell 2000 Index

$

100

$

118

$

117

$

77

$

98

$

124

Philadelphia Oil Service Index (OSX)

$

100

$

110

$

167

$

68

$

110

$

139

The foregoing graph shallshould not be deemed to be filed as part of this Form 10-K andAnnual Report, does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as amended, except to the extent that wethe Company specifically incorporateincorporates the graph by reference.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes information regarding ourthe Company’s equity securities that are authorized for issuance under the Company’s individual stock option compensation agreements:

Equity Compensation Plan InformationEQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Plan category

Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the Column (a))

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

1,605,135

$

3.90

2,880,024

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

-

-

-

TOTAL

1,605,135

$

3.90

2,880,024

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 17

Plan category

  Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in the
Column (a))
   (a)  (b)  (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  1,605,398  $5.13  304,022

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

       
          

Total

  1,605,398  $5.13  304,022
          

Issuer PurchasesBack to Contents

Recent Sales of EquityUnregistered Securities

During the fourth quarterthree months ended December 31, 2010 the Company had no sales of 2009, we purchased 22,491 shares of our common stock attributable to withholding to satisfy the payment of tax obligations related to the vesting of restricted shares.unregistered securities that have not been previously reported.

Period

  Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
  Average Price
Paid per Share
  Total Number of
Shares Purchase as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
  Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet
be Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009

    $    

November 1, 2009 to November 30, 2009

         

December 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009

  22,491   1.02    
             

Total

  22,491  $1.02    
             

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

ITEM 6  Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain selected historical financial data and should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’sItem 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. FinancialItem 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” which are included elsewhere herein. The selected operating and financial position data as of andpresented for each of the five years ended December 31, 2009 havehas been derived from ourthe Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, some of which appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. During the annual periods 20052006 through 2008, we effectedthe Company completed a number of business combinations and other transactions that materially affectaffected the comparability of the information set forthprovided below.

The Company incurred significant non-recurring charges during the years 2007 through 2010. During 2010, the Company recorded a fixed asset and other intangible impairment charge of $9.3 million. During 2009 and 2008, wethe Company recorded goodwill impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets of $18.5 million and $67.7 million, respectively. Additionally, onrespectively (see Note 9 to the Notes of the Consolidated Financial Statements). On July 11, 2007, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend to the stockholders of record on July 3, 2007. All share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 2007 stock split.

(in thousands, except per share data)

As of and for the Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

Operating Data

Revenue

$

146,982

$

112,550

$

226,063

$

158,008

$

100,642

Income (loss) from operations

(6,267)

(33,103)

(30,751)

29,686

18,853

Net income (loss)

(43,465)

(50,333)

(34,242)

16,727

11,350

Earnings (loss) per share – Basic

(1.94)

(2.68)

(1.79)

0.91

0.66

Earnings (loss) per share – Diluted

(1.94)

(2.68)

(1.79)

0.88

0.61

Financial Position Data

Total assets

184,807

178,901

234,959

160,793

82,890

Convertible senior notes, long term debt and capital lease obligations, less discount and current portion

126,682

119,190

120,281

52,377

8,185

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

(3,453)

27,196

66,105

77,461

53,509

2009 and 2008 amounts were restated in accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-15, “Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing.”

   As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
   2009  2008  2007  2006  2005
   (in thousands, except per share data)

Operating Data

        

Revenue

  $112,550   $226,063   $158,008  $100,642  $52,869

Income (loss) from operations

   (33,103  (30,751  29,686   18,853   10,114

Net income (loss)

   (50,705  (34,161  16,727   11,350   7,720

Earnings (loss) per share – Basic

   (2.70  (1.78  0.91   0.66   0.53

Earnings (loss) per share – Diluted

   (2.70  (1.78  0.88   0.61   0.47

Financial Position Data

        

Total assets

   178,610    234,575    160,793   82,890   52,158

Convertible senior notes and long-term debt, less discount and current portion

   119,190    120,281    52,377   8,185   7,277

Stockholders’ equity

   31,634    65,721    77,461   53,509   35,205

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 18


Back to Contents

The table above reflects the results of equity and asset acquisitions from the following acquisitionsrespective date of companies or their assets from their respective dates of acquisitions inacquisition for the following years:

2008 

Teledrift,–Teledrift, Inc.;

2007 –

Triumph Drilling Tools, Inc., CAVO Drilling Motors Ltd Co., and Sooner Energy Service, Inc.; and

2006 –

Can-Ok Oil Field Services, Inc., Total Well Solutions, LLC, and LifTech, LLC; andLLC.

2005 –

Phoenix E&P Technology, LLC, Spidle Sales and Services, Inc., Harmon’s Machine Works, Inc. and Precision-LOR, Ltd.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

ITEM 7  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with ourthe Company’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, our actual results maycould differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for further clarification.

Executive Summary

We are

The Company is a diversified global technology-driven growth company servingto the oil, gas, and mining industries by providing oilfield products, services and equipment. We operateThe Company operates in select domestic and international markets, including the Gulf Coast, the Southwest, and the Rocky Mountains, the Northeastern and Mid-Continental United States,US, Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, Europe, Africa and Asia. We market ourAsia and markets products domestically and internationally in over 20 countries. The Company’s customers for our products and services include the major integrated oil and natural gas companies, independent oil and natural gas companies, pressure pumping service companies, state-owned oil companies and state-owned national oilinternational service supply chain management companies. OurThe Company’s ability to compete in the oilfield services market is dependent on ourthe Company’s ability to differentiate our products and services, provide superior quality and service, and maintain a competitive cost structure. OurCompany operations are driven primarilyimpacted by natural gas and to a lesser extent oil well drilling activity, the depth and drilling conditions of such wells, the number of well completions and the level of work-over activity in North America. Drilling activity, in turn, is largely dependent on the pricevolatility of natural gas and crude oil and the volatilityprices and expectations of future natural gas and oil prices. OurThe Company’s results of operations also depend heavily on the pricing we receive from ourupon sustainable prices charged customers, which depends onare impacted by drilling activity levels, availability of equipment and other resources, and competitive pressures. These combined market factors oftencan lead to volatility in ourboth revenue and profitability.

Historical market conditions are reflected in the table below:

  2009  2008  2007  2009 vs.
2008
 2008 vs.
2007
 

2010

2009

2008

2010

vs

2009

2009

vs

2008

Average Active Drilling Rigs

         

United States

   1,089   1,879   1,768  (42.0)%  6.3

1,549

1,089

1,879

42.2

%

(42.0)

%

Canada

   221   381   344  (42.0)%  10.8

349

221

381

57.9

%

(42.0)

%

            

Total North America

   1,310   2,260   2,112  (42.0)%  7.0

1,898

1,310

2,260

44.9

%

(42.0)

%

            

Vertical rigs (U.S.)

   433   954   999  (54.6)%  (4.5)% 

Horizontal rigs (U.S.)

   455   553   393  (17.7)%  40.7

Directional rigs (U.S.)

   201   372   376  (46.0)%  (1.1)% 
            

Total drilling type (U.S.)

   1,089   1,879   1,768   
            

Vertical Rigs (U.S.)

502

433

954

16.0

%

(54.6)

%

Horizontal Rigs (U.S.)

825

455

553

81.3

%

(17.7)

%

Directional Rigs (U.S.)

222

201

372

10.4

%

(46.0)

%

Total Drilling Type (U.S.)

1,549

1,089

1,879

Oil vs. Natural Gas Drilling Rigs

         

Oil

   382   543   426  (29.7)%  27.5

795

382

543

108.1

%

(29.7)

%

Natural Gas

   928   1,717   1,686  (46.0)%  1.8

1,103

928

1,717

18.9

%

(46.0)

%

            

Total North America

   1,310   2,260   2,112   

1,898

1,310

2,260

            

Average Commodity Prices

         

West Texas Intermediate Crude Prices (per barrel)

  $61.65  $99.57  $72.32  (38.1)%  37.7

$

79.40

$

61.65

$

99.57

28.8

%

(38.1)

%

Natural Gas Prices ($/mmbtu)

  $3.71  $8.07  $6.38  (54.0)%  26.5

$

4.25

$

3.71

$

8.07

14.6

%

(54.0)

%

Source: Rig count: Baker Hughes, Inc. (www.bakerhughes.com); West Texas Intermediate Crude and Natural Gas Prices: Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (www.eia.doe.gov).

Demand

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 19


Back to Contents

Global economic growth and increased demand for our services in the United Statesoil and Canada is driven primarily by natural gas are the primary drivers of customer expenditures to develop and to a lesser extent oil drilling activity, which tends to be extremely volatile, depending on the current and anticipated prices of crudeproduce oil and natural gas. DuringThe recovery within the last ten years, the lowest average annual U.S. rig count was 830global economy began in 20022010 and

the highest average annual U.S. rig count was 1,879 is anticipated to continue in 2008. With the decline2011. Increased economic activity, particularly in emerging Asia and volatilityMiddle East economies, and market predictions for continued economic growth supports expectations of increasing demand for oil and natural gas. Spending by oil and natural gas exploration and production companies, which is dependent upon forecasts of the expected future supply and future demand for oil pricesand natural gas products and associated estimates of costs to find, develop, and produce reserves, increased in 2009, tightening2010 as compared to 2009. Changes in oil and uncertaintynatural gas exploration and production spending resulted in increased demand for the Company’s products and services.

In North America, customer expenditures increased for both oil and natural gas projects resulting in a 45% increase in the credit markets and the global economic slowdown, drilling rig activity in North America declined significantly. The average active North American rig count declined 42.0% in 20092010 as compared to 2008.

The weakening economic conditions that began to significantly weigh upon the energy markets in early October 2008 continued throughout 2009. The slowdownincrease in oil-directed drilling is a direct reflection of the global price of oil, which is currently trading at a premium, on a Btu basis, relative to natural gas in North America. The increase in gas-directed drilling was driven by activity in unconventional shale gas plays due to the favorable prices of wet gas, despite relatively low prices for natural gas. Spending on gas-directed projects in 2010 was supported by (1) hedges on production made in prior periods when futures prices were higher, (2) the need to drill and produce natural gas to hold leases acquired in earlier periods, (3) the influx of equity from companies interested in developing a position in the economy, particularly the industrial sector, coupled with the successfulshale resource plays and (4) associated production results in the unconventional shale and tight sands plays in the U.S. led to aof natural gas oversupply situation, which negatively impacted natural gas price forecasts. Thisliquids in turn reduced the return potential of drilling projects causing less drilling activity as exploration and production (“E&P”) companies slashed their 2009 capital budgets. Oil prices showed some resilience toward the end of 2009; however our business is more dependent on the North American gas markets than oil markets. Therefore, the recovery of oil prices toward the end of 2009 did little to support a significant improvement in our business performance. In total, this translated into lower demand and weaker prices for oilfield services throughout North America. Late in the fourth quarter of 2008, we began to take actions to scale our business to cope with these factors by implementing various cost containment actions such as deferring employee salaries, reducing travel levels, suspending the 401(k) match, and eliminating any non-essential discretionary expenditures. Early in 2009, we took actions to size the workforce to our expected near-term work load, resulting in headcount reductions, including contract employees and full and part time employees. In conjunction with the market downturn, we decreased inventory levels and took advantage of declining raw material prices to meet our customers demand for competitive pricing. Our Drilling Products segment is tied closely to rig count, especially vertical rigs, and the significant reductions in rig count had an adverse effect on our business. Despite these pressures we were able to maintain our market share through service quality, product innovation, and competitive bundling of product offerings.certain basins.

The sharp drop in natural gas and oil prices in the latter part of 2008 resulted in lower drilling activity, higher inventories, and further market erosion in 2009 asAs a result of a worldwide economic slowdown which ledstreamlining operational costs in 2009 and proactive management of operational costs during 2010, the Company was favorably positioned to a rapidrespond to increased activity and substantial reductionproduct demand in exploration2010. Further, innovative sales initiatives and production expenditures. In addition, margins were under significant pressurestrategic international efforts enabled the Company to increase revenues by 30.6% in 2010 as customers sought lower prices for oilfield services and we, in turn sought price reductions from our suppliers.compared to 2009.

Forecasting the depth and length ofCompany’s position in the current recovery cycle is challenging, as it is differentdiffers from past cycles due to the overlay of continued worldwide uncertainties, including significant political unrest and radical regime and governmental changes in significant oil producing countries. Changes in product demand to liquid rich natural gas and oil products from natural gas products affected the worldwide financial crisistype of industry drilling activity and increased petroleum pricing. Despite recent favorable activity the Company expects continued uncertainty in combination with broad demand weakness. During the fourth quarter of 2009, U.S. drilling rig count averaged 1,108, as compared to 970 in the third quarter, an increase of 14.2%. While we expect to see continued increases in U.S. drilling activity in 2010, the timing and magnitude of the increase remains uncertain. The acceleration of drilling activity is influenced by2011 due to a number of factors including commodity prices, global demand for oil and natural gas, supply and depletion rates of oil and natural gas reserves, as well as broader variables such asincluding government monetaryfiscal policies and fiscal policy.current and potential political unrest in key petroleum producing countries.

The oil field services sector seems to have experienced itsa cyclical low point early in the third quarter of 2009. OurStabilization of the business stabilized and the cost containment measures that we implementedtaken by the Company beginning in late 2008 and early 2009 began to take effect. Rig activity in North America began to improve toward the latter part of 2009 as gas price forecasts improved as the supply overages began to shrink as a result of some improvement in the economy and colder than normal temperature forecasts. We expect that thesewere still being realized throughout 2010. The Company expects improved economic conditions will continue throughout 2010.2011 despite drilling activity uncertainty. As E&Pexploration and production companies’ outlooks improve with these higher expectedexpectations of forecast liquid-rich natural gas and oil prices, we expect this will lead to increasedthe Company remains optimistic capital budgets for drilling and completion activities. Oil prices have currently stabilized and this should continue to addactivities will strengthen. The Company expects rig count in the oil basins, which should help improve ourhave contributed to Drilling Products revenue andwith increased Teledrift business in the Permian Basin, to lead to margin relief on pricing.

We expect theThe Company expects that North American gas market activity will continue to see increasesremain stable in the unconventional plays such as the Barnett, Haynesville, Marcellus and other basins where ourwhich utilize the Company’s drilling tools are utilized. Ourtools. In addition, the Company expects chemical additives enhancewill continue realizes to enhanced performance, when added to fracturing fluids utilized in this type drilling. Ourdrilling further supporting the stability of product demand of the Company’s Chemicals and Logistics segment which is also tiedclosely aligned to rig counts, especially horizontal drilling rigs. We also expectcount activity. The Company plans to see additionalpursue identified international opportunities in 2011.

The Company expects 2011 drilling and completion activity to remain relatively stable compared to 2010 particularlylevels. Market conditions are forecast to improve slightly and pricing is expected to remain competitive throughout 2011. The Company intends to continue the strategic initiative to add drilling jars and shock subs to the company’s fleet and to reduce the Company’s sub-rental usage. The Company also intends to continue to pursue international market opportunities with the Teledrift line of MWD products during 2011.

With research efforts focused on the Chemicals segment, the Company has been able to timely respond to the increased demand for growth in our Chemicalunconventional liquid rich and MWD business units.

oil sand formation plays. As a result of the Company’s success in unconventional areas, such as the Marcellus Shale, and within tight sand gas play areas, such as the Niobrara, the Company expects to continue to experience growth within identified basins by leveraging the proven success of the Company’s products, in particular, complex nanofluids.The Drilling segment has effectively redesigned the Company’s motors to operate more successfully in areas such as Haynesville, Barnett and Bakken. The increase in operational performance of the Company’s Artificial Lift segment enabled the Company to significantly increase the customer base in 2010.

Capital expenditures in the Drilling segment were $4.7 million in 2010 compared to $6.2 million in 2009. Capital expenditures were significantly curtailed in 2010 in response to decreased demand. Management has forecast Drilling capital expenditures of $7.9 million in 2011; however, this amount may fluctuate dependent upon market demand and realized results of operations. The Company intends to sharpen the focus of capital expenditures within the Drilling segment to further increase the Company’s international presence.

OurThe Company’s business is comprised of three reportable segments: Chemicals, and Logistics, Drilling Products and Artificial Lift. WeThe Company’s focus is on serving the drilling-related needs of oil and gas companies primarily through ourthe Chemicals and Logistics and Drilling Products segments, and the production-relatedproduction related needs of oil and gas companies through ourthe Artificial Lift and Chemicals and Logistics segments. We believe that ourThe Company believes product offerings and geographical presence throughout theseall three business segments provides usthe Company with diverse sources of cash flow. EachAlthough each segment has its ownunique technical expertise, andall segments share a common commitment to provide its customers with quality, competitively priced quality equipment and services.

The Chemicals segment is comprised of two business divisions: Specialty Chemicals and Logistics segmentLogistics. Specialty Chemicals designs, develops, manufactures, packages and markets specialty chemicals used in oil and gas well cementing, stimulation, acidizing, drilling and production treatment. Additionally, the segment provides well cementing, bulkproduction. Logistics manages automated material handling, loading facilities, and blending and transloadcapabilities for oilfield services and transload facility management services.companies.

The Drilling Products segment rents, inspects, manufactures and markets downholedown-hole drilling equipment for the energy, mining, water well and industrial drilling sectors.

The Artificial Lift segment assembles and markets artificial lift equipment, which includesincluding the Petrovalve line of rod pump components, electric submersible pumps, and gas separators, valves and services tothat support coal bed methane production.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 20


Back to Contents

Over the past threeseveral years, we havethe Company has grown both organically and through strategic acquisitions, organic growth and other investments in complementary or competing businesses in an effort to expand our product offeringofferings and geographic presence in keywithin targeted markets. We strive to mitigateThe Company mitigates oilfield service cyclical risk in the oilfield service sector by balancing our operations between drilling versus production; rental tools versus service; domestic versus international; and natural gas versus crude oil.oil operations.

The acquisitions weAcquisitions completed by the Company in the preceding three years include:

Teledrift, Inc. (“Teledrift”), which designs and manufactures wireless survey and measurement while drilling toolsMWD equipment, in February 2008;

Sooner Energy Services, Inc. (“Sooner”), which develops, produces and distributes specialty chemical products and services for drilling and production of natural gas in August 2007;

A 50% partnership interest in CAVO Drilling Motors, Ltd, Co., (“CAVO”), which specializes in the rental, service and sale of high performance mud motors in January 2007, and the remaining 50% partnership interest in November 2007;

Triumph Drilling Tools, Inc. (“Triumph”), a drilling tool sales and rental provider in Texas, New Mexico, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Arkansas, in January 2007;

Non-Cash Impairment2008.

We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level in the fourth quarter of every year and on an interim basis if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Testing of goodwill requires an assessment of the current business environment, future economic market indicators, expectations surrounding our future performance, the cost of working capital, projected revenue and operating margins, assessment of market and industry risk rates, and recognition of changes in these variables which may indicate the potential existence of goodwill impairment losses to be recognized, if any.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we identified certain triggering events resulting from the continued downturn in the then current business environment. This assessment impacted and lowered forecasted earning potential of our reporting units from that previously estimated at December 31, 2008. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill pre-tax impairment charge of $18.5 million relating to our Teledrift reporting unit during the six-months ended June 30, 2009.

As our current economic climate continues to be weak, we incorporated into our 2009 annual impairment assessment, and our 2010 full year forecast, a measure of the recessionary environment of the second half of 2009. We anticipate a continued challenging environment for the first half of 2010, followed by a slight recovery in the latter half of 2010. We anticipate benefits from a re-leveraging of sales in the second half of 2010 and early 2011. The continued unfavorable business environment, volatile economic downturn continuing during the latter half of 2009, low rig count projections, and uncertainty as to the recovery of the global economy, have contributed to conservative projected cash flows and higher risk-adjusted discount rates used in our current annual 2009 assessment as compared to those used in our interim 2009 and annual 2008 assessments.

We believe cost containment actions taken in late 2008 and throughout 2009 were successful. These included closing certain operating locations, curtailing capital expenditures, reducing costs through reductions in personnel levels, discontinuing our 401(k) matching, and focusing on our cost margin management. We emphasized collection of customer receivables and inventory management. This helped ensure preservation of the economic value of our businesses. Through our analyses, we determined that the fair value of reporting units exceeded the goodwill carrying value. Accordingly, we determined no further impairment charges were necessary as part of our 2009 annual goodwill impairment assessment.

We utilize a combination of a market approach and a present value discounted cash flow valuation technique to measure the fair value of the goodwill of our reporting units. The fair value of a reporting unit refers to the price that would be received from selling the unit as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for the measurement, if available. The market approach is dependent upon market data of comparable public entities with operations and metrics similar to those of our operating segments. If quoted market prices or market indicators are not available, we include a fair value estimate in our assessment which incorporates valuation techniques based on a weighted average cost of capital and multiple of after-tax cash flows attributed to the reporting unit. The cash flows are discounted to a present value using risk adjusted discount rates over a period of expected future returns. This income approach valuation technique is consistent with the objective of fair value measurements and is consistent with the methodology applied in our previous assessments. The income approach is dependent on our weighted average cost of capital and our forecasted operating results and future cash flows. Therefore, we consider available and relevant market multiple measures along with the estimated and expected future cash flows of our reporting units to determine fair value.

Results of Operations (in thousands):

  Years Ended December 31, 

Year Ended December 31,

  2009 2008 2007 

2010

2009

2008

Revenue

  $112,550   $226,063   $158,008  

$

146,982

$

112,550

$

226,063

Cost of revenue

   83,166    135,307    94,561  

94,012

83,166

135,307

          

Gross margin

   29,384    90,756    63,447  

52,970

29,384

90,756

Selling, general and administrative costs

   36,943    46,311    30,639  

Selling, general and administrative cost

41,861

36,943

46,311

Depreciation and amortization

   4,926    5,570    2,273  

4,543

4,926

5,570

Research and development costs

   2,118    1,931    849  

1,441

2,118

1,931

Impairment of long-lived assets

8,898

-

-

Loss on disposal of long-lived assets

2,104

-

-

Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets

   18,500    67,695      

390

18,500

67,695

          

Income (loss) from operations

   (33,103  (30,751  29,686  

Loss from operations

(6,267)

(33,103)

(30,751)

Change in fair value of warrant liability

(21,464)

465

-

Interest and other expense, net

   (15,586  (13,909  (2,545

(21,279)

(15,679)

(13,990)

          

Income (loss) before income taxes

   (48,689  (44,660  27,141  

Loss before income taxes

(49,010)

(48,317)

(44,741)

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

   (2,016  10,499    (10,414

5,545

(2,016)

10,499

          

Net income (loss)

  $(50,705 $(34,161 $16,727  
          

NET LOSS

$

(43,465)

$

(50,333)

$

(34,242)

Results for 2010 compared to 2009—Consolidated

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $147.0 million, an increase of $34.4 million, or 30.6%, compared to $112.6 million for the same period in 2009. Revenue increased across all of the company’s segments due to improved pricing, increased drilling activity, and slight recovery of industry demand for products.

Consolidated gross margin increased by $23.6 million, or 80.3%, to $53.0 million in 2010 from $29.4 million in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 36.0% for 2010 from 26.1% for 2009. This favorable variance resulted from increased product sales ($21.5 million or 29.7%) and rental revenue ($13.5 million or 47.3%) combined with direct operational expense savings offset by a 13.0% increase in cost of revenue. Increased cost of revenue was due to increased costs of materials, rentals and freight proportionate to increased activity. Gross margin is calculated as revenue less associated cost of revenue, inclusive of personnel, occupancy, depreciation and other expenses directly associated with the generation of revenue.

Selling, general and administrative costs, (“SG&A”) are not directly attributable to products sold or services rendered. SG&A costs for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $41.9 million, an increase of 13.3%, compared to $36.9 million in 2009. The comparative period over period increase resulted from increased incentive stock compensation expense of $4.0 million and professional fees of $2.1 million. Non-cash incentive stock compensation expense increased due to recognition of $3.0 million of non-cash compensation expense during the second quarter of 2010 related to prior equity grants to the Company’s former President and CEO, which vested at the time of his retirement from the Company on June 30, 2010 and vesting of other outstanding existing equity grants. The increase in professional fees related to the Company’s March 31, 2010 financing, defense of class action lawsuits and use of third party technical consultants (e.g., information technology; investment; and valuation advisors).

Depreciation and amortization costs were $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of approximately 8.1% compared to the same period in 2009.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 21


Back to Contents

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses were $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of 33.3%, compared to $2.1 million during the same period in 2009. The reduction in R&D expense is attributable to more realigned spending objectives on key initiatives driven by the economic recession and management cost containment objectives. The Company anticipates 2011 R&D spending levels to remain consistent with 2010. R&D is charged to expense as incurred.

Costs associated with impairments totaled $8.9 million and $0.4 million, related to long-lived asset and other intangibles, for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $9.2 million or 49.8% compared to $18.5 million in 2009. The impairment valuation recognized during 2010 primarily related to long-lived assets within the Drilling segment. During the fourth quarter of 2010 revenue generation trends of certain identified rental assets were not performing as anticipated by management in the Company’s 2010 forecast. Upon review, management determined the recoverability of the carrying value of certain assets to be less than the expected revenue generation capacity of the assets. The $18.5 million recognized in 2009 was attributable to the Teledrift division.

Revenue within the Drilling segment increased $15.0 million, or 29.6% in 2010 due to increased demand for products resulting from a shift in the type of drilling activity as well as fluctuations in oil and natural gas commodity prices. Management believes the current cost structure is appropriate for 2011 forecast levels of activity and does not foresee significant future adjustments. Changes in market demand or forecast assumptions could cause management to pursue additional cost containment efforts.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the warrant liability increased by $21.5 million to $26.2 million. The increase has been recognized in the statement of operations as a noncash expense. This liability will not be settled in cash. Future fluctuations in the warrant liability will be recognized as noncash income or expense.

Interest expense was $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $3.9 million or 25.0% compared with $15.5 million in 2009. The increase was the result of an increase in the interest rate associated with the refinancing of the Company’s senior credit facility from 8.5% to 12.5% combined with the amortization of related issuance costs of $2.0 million incurred during the year (See “Capital Resources and Liquidity”), commitment fee payments of $7.3 million.

An income tax benefit of $5.5 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2010, reflecting an effective tax rate of (11.3)%, compared to a tax provision of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, reflecting an effective tax rate of (4.2%). The change in the Company’s effective tax rate is primarily due to a $4.2 million increase in the valuation allowance recorded in 2010 against the deferred tax asset of one of our filing jurisdictions and a $7.5 million increase to tax expense recorded in 2010 for the nondeductible expense related to the warrant liability.

Results for 2009 compared to 2008—Consolidated

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $112.6 million, a decrease of $113.5 million, or 50.2%, compared to $226.1 million for the same period in 2008. Revenue decreased inacross all three of ourthe Company’s segments as decreases indepressed petroleum and natural gas prices drove down rig countscount and related drilling activity, negatively affectingimpacting activity volume in all segments. In addition, pricing2009. Pricing pressures drove down revenueswere also a factor in the decline of revenue as customers movedswitched to less expensive products where possible.

Consolidated gross margin decreased $61.4 million. Gross marginmillion and as a percentage of sales decreased to 26.1% for the year ended December 31,in 2009 from 40.1% in 2008 due primarily to margin compression in the Drilling Products segment and segmentsegment. Although direct expense reductions of $5.9 million were realized in 2009 versus 2008, the decrease in direct expenses that while reduced $5.9 million, decreased at a lower rate than revenue. Gross margin is calculateddid not occur as revenue lessswiftly as the corresponding cost of revenue, which includes personnel, occupancy, depreciation and other expenses directly associated with the generation ofdecline in revenue.

Selling, general and administrative costs are not directly attributable to products sold or services rendered. Selling, general and administrativeSG&A costs were $36.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of 20.2%, compared to $46.3 million in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a $9.3 million reduction in indirect personnel and personnel related costs and professional fees due to headcount reduction and cost containment efforts.

Depreciation and amortization costs were $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of approximately 11.6% compared to the same period$5.6 million in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to aA reduction of amortizable intangible assets as a result ofand depreciable fixed assets due to the asset impairment recorded in 2008.2008 was the primary cause of the decrease.

Research and development (R&D)R&D costs in 2009 were $2.1 million, for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of 9.7%, compared to $1.9 million during the same period in 2008. R&D costs in the Chemicals and Logistics segment were 65% and 89% of total R&D expense in 2009 and 2008, respectively. We anticipate 2010 R&D spending levels to remain consistent with 2009 expenditures. R&D expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.

In the second quarter of 2009, we recordedthe Company recognized goodwill impairment of approximately $18.5 million related to the Teledrift reporting unit. No additional impairment was recorded as part of management’s 2009 annual assessment of goodwill.

Management believes its cost structure is appropriate for its forecast level of activity and does not foresee significant adjustments; however, changes in market demands or forecast may cause management to further reduce headcount or carry out additional cost containment efforts.

Interest expense was $15.4$15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 versus $13.8$13.9 million in 2008.for the comparative 2008 period. The increase was primarily related to accretion of the debt discount recordedrecognized effective January 1, 2009 associated with adoption of a new accounting principle.

An income tax provision of $2.0 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009, reflectingresulting in an effective tax rate of (4.1%)(4.2)%, compared to a tax benefit of $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, reflectingwith an effective tax rate of 23.5%. The change in ourthe Company’s effective tax rate, is primarily due toresulted from an $18.8 million valuation allowance recorded in 2009 against the deferred tax assets of one of ourthe Company’s filing jurisdictions. In addition, the 2008 impairment hadjurisdictions and due to a $19.3 million impact on ourimpairment charged assessed in 2008 which impacted the 2008 tax provision and there was no similar impact in 2009.provision.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 22


Back to Contents

Results by Segment

Chemicals and Logistics (dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Revenue

$

66,121

$

49,296

$

109,356

Gross margin

$

29,249

$

21,667

$

49,119

Gross margin %

44.2

%

44.0

%

44.9

%

Income from operations

$

19,833

$

12,964

$

37,433

Income from operations %

30.0

%

26.3

%

34.2

%

Results for 20082010 compared to 2007—Consolidated2009—Chemicals and Logistics

RevenueChemicals’ revenue for the year ended December 31, 20082010 was $226.1$66.1 million, an increase of 43.1%$16.8 million, or 34.1%, as compared to $158.0$49.3 million in 2009. Recovery of previously granted product and service price reductions, increased international sales and increased demand for microemulsion products from new and existing customers drove the same periodincrease. Additionally, new products generated from the Company’s ongoing R&D activities continue to be favorably received by customers. The favorable variance also correlates with an 18.9% increase in 2007. Revenue increasedaverage natural gas rig activity (2010: 1,103 rigs vs. 2009: 928 rigs) within the industry and corresponding product sales increases of $17.5 million. The favorable variances was offset by a decrease in all threecustomer service revenue ($0.7 million) in the first half of our segments2010 as we experienced

organic growth greater than 20% when compared to the previous year with the remainderfirst half of 2009 in response to industry uncertainty regarding ramifications of the growth coming from our acquisitionBritish Petroleum Deepwater Horizon oil disaster. Correspondingly, the drilling moratorium in the Gulf of Teledrift. Mexico significantly impacted the Company’s Logistics division contract in the Gulf of Mexico.

The organic revenue growth is primarily a result of an increasegross margin increased $7.6 million, or 35% in overall sales volume, particularly of our patented micro-emulsion chemicals, tool rentals, service inspections and expansion of our mud motor fleet. Sales of our patented micro-emulsion chemicals grew 37.2%, to $77.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $90.8 million, an increase of 43.0%,2010 as compared to $63.4 million for2009; however, the same period in 2007. Grossgross margin as a percentage of revenue remained relatively flat between both periods at approximately, 40.2% of revenues. We actively managed our gross margin through targeted price increases and cost containment measures to offset increasing raw material prices throughout the year. We continued to experience greater volumes within our higher margin Chemicals and Logistics segment and volumes related to the Teledrift acquisition. Sales of our patented micro-emulsion chemicals, which sell at higher margins, made up 34.2% of consolidated revenues44.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, compared to 35.7%44.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007.2009. Favorable variances were due to increased product sales volumes and favorable product mix margins.

Selling, general and administrative costs were $46.3Income from operations was $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, an increase of 51.2%,approximately 53.0% compared to $30.6$13.0 million in 2009. Income from operations as a percentage of revenue increased to 30.0% for 2010 from 26.3% for the same period in 2007. Excluding the Teledrift acquisition, the increase was primarily due2009. Favorable variance is attributable to a $10.6 million increase in indirect personnel, office and occupancy costs in all divisions as we shifted into the more people-intensive rental and service business, expanded geographically and expanded ourincreased product sales and corporate support staff. The acquisition of Teledrift accounted for $2.1 million of the total increase, and professional fees increased $2.1 million due to higher administration and management costs, which were incurred to strengthen back office functions and internal controls.favorable product mix margins.

Depreciation and amortization costs were $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of 145%, compared to $2.3 million during the same period in 2007. The increase is due to higher depreciation associated with acquired assets and expanded capital expenditures.

Research and development costs were $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of 127%, compared to $0.8 million during the same period in 2007. In 2008 we expanded our R&D investments in the Chemicals and Logistics segment by approximately 125%. R&D expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.

We impaired the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s sustained low stock price and reduced market capitalization, macroeconomic factors impacting industry conditions, actual recent results and forecasted operating performance, as well as other factors. The Company determined that the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets exceeded the estimated fair value of certain reporting units and intangible assets, and, as a result, recorded an impairment of $67.7 million at December 31, 2008. (Loss) from operations was ($30.8) million for the year in 2008 compared to income from operations of $29.7 million for the year in 2007.

Interest expense was $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 versus $3.5 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was a result of the increase in our overall debt level associated with the issuance of the convertible senior notes in the amount of $115 million used to finance the Teledrift acquisition, non-cash interest expense related to the application of ASC 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options,” and pay down amounts previously outstanding under our senior credit facility. Additionally, we amortized debt fees related to our financing agreements throughout 2008 that amounted to approximately $1.0 million.

An income tax benefit of $10.5 million was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2008. The effective tax rate for 2008 was 23.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008 versus 38.4% for 2007. The decrease in our effective tax rate is primarily due to impairment charges and a shift in income by jurisdiction. The impairment had a $19.3 million impact on our tax provision.

Results by Segment

    Chemicals and Logistics (dollars in thousands)

     
   Years Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Revenue

  $49,296   $109,356   $86,271  

Gross margin

  $21,667   $49,119   $40,474  

Gross margin %

   44.0%  44.9%  46.9%

Income from operations

  $12,964   $37,433   $32,389  

Income from operations %

   26.3%  34.2%  37.5%
              

Results for 2009 compared to 2008—Chemicals and Logistics

Chemicals and Logistics revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $49.3 million, a decrease of $60.1 million, or 54.9%, compared to $109.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in Chemicals and Logistics revenue was primarily due to a 46% reduction in volume as a result ofdriven by lower crude and natural gas prices driving aand associated steep drop in rig activity and well fracturing activities. In addition,activity. Further, pricing pressures drove customers to lower priced products resulting in a 24% decrease in average sales dollars per unit sold.sold in 2009 versus 2008. Sales of ourthe Company’s patented micro-emulsion chemicals declined 59% to $31.6 million.million in 2009 compared to 77.3 million in 2008. Demand for micro-emulsion chemicals is driven bycontingent upon various market forcesvariables including the fact that micro-emulsion chemicals historically have a higher per-unit cost.

Gross margin decreased $27.5 million in 2009 due primarily to reductions in revenue and a slight reductionrevenue. Slight reductions in gross margin as a percentage of revenue from 44.9% to 44.0%. were realized in 2009 versus 2008, respectively. Product margins as a percentage of product revenue remained flat. Field direct expenses as a percentage of segment revenue increased to 8.1% in 2009 from 5.5% in 2008 as revenue decreased at a higher rate than reductions made due to cost containment efforts.reductions. Chemical product costs can fluctuatefluctuated significantly with the price of petroleum and we generally dopetroleum. The Company has historically not leadled the market in pricing, therefore,accordingly, product margins are subject todirectly impacted by market and cost fluctuations. We cannot be assured of passing on timely price increases; however, we believe our margins will fluctuate consistent with other market participants.

Income from operations was $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of approximately 65.4% compared to the same period in 2008. Income from operations as a percentage of revenue decreased to 26.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009.2009 versus 34.2% in 2008. Field indirect costs decreased by $3.2 million or 26.8% due primarily to on-going cost containment efforts;efforts initiated in 2008. The rate of cost reductions, however, reductions did not keep pace with revenue decreases andthe decline in revenue; accordingly field indirect costs increased as a percentage of revenue to 17.7% in 2009 from 10.9%. in 2008.

Drilling Products (dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Revenue

$

65,782

$

50,774

$

98,262

Gross margin

$

18,991

$

4,781

$

36,897

Gross margin %

28.9

%

9.4

%

37.5

%

Loss from operations

$

(9,738)

$

(32,084)

$

(43,840)

Income from operations %

(14.8)

%

(63.2)

%

(44.6)

%

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 23


Back to Contents

Results for 20082010 compared to 2007—Chemicals and Logistics2009—Drilling Products

Chemicals and LogisticsDrilling revenue for the year ended December 31, 20082010 was $109.4$65.8 million, an increase of 26.8%,$15.0 million, or 29.6% compared to $86.3$50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.2009. The favorable variance was attributable to increased rental activity of $13.6 million that was partially driven by a 16.0% increase in revenue is primarily a result of a $21.0vertical rig count during 2010 as compared to 2009 (2010: 502 versus 2009: 433). The $13.6 million increase, by reporting unit, consisted of increased rental activity of $6.4 million for Teledrift products and $7.1 million for Spidle/Turbeco. Teledrift realized 104% revenue growth in West Texas due to improved market conditions, marketing and sales efforts and above average lost-in-hole revenue. Spidle/Turbeco revenue benefited from increased motor rentals in both the Barnett and Bakken shales. Improved motor designs for historically difficult basins resulted in improved pricing and run rates. An additional $1.3 million period over period increase was realized from increased domestic and international product sales both domestically and internationally to the copper mining industry. Increased copper mining activity is attributable to an escalation in the market price of our patented micro-emulsion chemicals,copper.

Gross margin increased to $19.0 million in 2010, an increase of $4.4$14.2 million, dueor 297.2%, compared to the Sooner Energy Services, Inc. acquisition, and a $2.2$4.8 million increase in services revenue. The increases were offset by a $4.2 million decrease in sales of the remainder of our chemical business as those products became commoditized due to increased competition. We also instituted a price increase in the first quarter of 2008 that we maintained for most of the year. However, in the second half of the year our margins declined as a result of rising raw material costs. Sales of micro-emulsion chemicals grew 37.2%, to $77.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $56.4 million for the same period in 2007 as a result of increased fracturing activities and wider acceptance of our micro-emulsion products by independent pressure pumping companies as well as the majors.

Income from operations was $37.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, approximately 16% higher than the same period in 2007. Income from operations2009. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreasedincreased 19.5% to 34.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008.28.9% in 2010 from 9.4% in 2009. Favorable period over period variance was primarily due to increased rental volumes and favorable product mix margins.

Loss from operations was $9.8 million in 2010, an improvement of $22.3 million or 69.6% as compared to $32.1 million loss in 2009. The rising cost of raw materials (petroleum-based feedstock) reduced our operating profit. We partially offset this cost increase through targeted price increases for certain products. We also made investments related to a new research and development facility and for our international initiative.

As a result of the declining market conditions experienced in the fourth quarter of 2008, we began to institute measures to size the organizationimproved performance is primarily due to the current marketplace. We relocated one production chemical manufacturing facility. As a technology driven company, we remained active$9.6 million positive variance between the 2010 realized $9.3 million impairment of long-lived and other intangible assets and the 2009 $18.5 million impairment of goodwill, combined with the $13.6 million increase in our research and development efforts by maintaining these costs at current levels as a percentage of revenues. We anticipated increased price pressures from our customers within the marketplace and focused our attention on margin protection through management of both raw materials and fixed costs, in addition to technology innovations.rental revenue.

    Drilling Products (dollars in thousands)

     
   Years Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Revenue

  $50,774   $98,262   $56,836  

Gross margin

  $4,781   $36,897   $19,132  

Gross margin %

   9.4%  37.5%  33.7%

Income (loss) from operations

  $(32,084 $(43,840 $5,632  

Income (loss) from operations %

   (63.2%)  (44.6%)  9.9%
              

Results for 2009 compared to 2008—Drilling Products

Drilling Products revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $50.8 million, a decrease of $47.5 million, or 48.3%, compared to $98.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in revenue2009 decline as compared to 2008 was primarily due to decreased demand for our products and services commensurate with the reduction in total rig count in North America. Reductions in volume were experienced in all product lines and nearly all products. In addition,Further, an oversupply of tools available for rent or sale by the Company and in the market due to the economic slowdownrecession created pricing pressures reducingthat reduced revenue on a per rental basis.

Gross margin decreased $32.1 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to reductions in revenue and margins.reduced revenue. Product and rental gross margins as a percentage of relatedassociated revenue decreaseddeclined to 55.6% in 2009 from 66.0% in 2008, accounting for a $4.6 million relative decrease in gross margin, primarily due to market pricing pressures. Field direct costs decreased by $3.6 million or 16% in 2009 due primarily to cost containment efforts; however, due to lower revenues, thosereduced revenue, costs increased as a percentage of segment revenue to 37% from 23%. In addition, inventoryInventory adjustments which related primarily to increased inventory reserves, increased $1.9 million in 2009 as compared to 2008.2008 contributing to the decrease.

Loss from operations was $32.1 million in 2009, a decreasean improvement of $11.8 million or 26.8% as compared to 2008.the 2008 loss of $43.8 million. The smaller loss is primarilypositive variance was due to a decreaseyear-over-year reduction in goodwill impairment to $18.5charges ($18.5 million in 2009 fromversus $59.1 million in 2008,) offset by the decrease indecreased gross margin. For further discussion of goodwill impairment, see Note 7 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”margins. Field indirect costs decreased by $3.2 million or 15.0% in 2009 as compared to 2008 due primarily to cost containment efforts; however, due to the lower revenues, thosereduced revenue, indirect costs increased as a percentage of segment revenue to 36.2% from 22.0%.

We anticipate modest rig count growth in 2010 continuing the trend of late 2009, and while market conditions should improve slightly as a result, we expect that pricing will remain competitive throughout 2010. We intend to continue the initiative of adding drilling jars and shock subs to our fleet and reducing our sub-rental usage. We

also intend to continue to pursue international market opportunities with the Teledrift line of MWD products during 2010. While our efforts to introduce the Telepulse MWD for horizontal drilling were slowed by market conditions in 2009 we anticipate moving forwardfrom 22.0% in 2008.

Artificial Lift (dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Revenue

$

15,079

$

12,480

$

18,445

Gross margin

$

4,730

$

2,936

$

4,740

Gross margin %

31.4

%

23.5

%

25.7

%

Income (loss) from operations

$

3,070

$

1,161

$

(6,709)

Income (loss) from operations %

20.4

%

9.3

%

(36.4)

%

Results for 2010 with this initiative.

Capital expenditures in the Drilling Products segment were $6.2 million in 2009 compared to $19.8 million in 2008. After building tool and rental inventory in 2008, capital expenditures were significantly curtailed in 2009 in response to decreased demand. Management has forecast Drilling Products capital expenditures of $3.5 million in 2010; however, this amount may fluctuate dependent upon market demand and our results of operations.2009—Artificial Lift

Results for 2008 compared to 2007—Drilling Products

Drilling ProductsArtificial Lift revenue for the year ended December 31, 20082010 was $98.3$15.1 million, an increase of 72.9%$2.6 million, or 20.8%, compared to $56.8$12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.2009. The acquisitionmajority of Teledrift, Inc. contributed 63%Artificial Lift revenue is derived from coal bed methane (“CBM”) drilling. CBM drilling activity is highly correlated to the price of natural gas. The price of natural gas has increased 14.4% to $4.25/mmbtu at the end of December 2010 from $3.71/mmbtu for the same period in 2009. Throughout 2010 natural gas drilling activity also steadily increased to levels in excess of 1,000 natural gas drilling rigs. The average North American natural gas rig count increased 18.9% to 1,103 rigs at the end of December 2010 from 928 rigs for the comparable period in 2009. The impact of the growthincrease in Drilling Products revenuesnatural gas prices and corresponding increase in 2008. Organic growth relateddrilling activity resulted in an increase in the volume of units sold.

Gross margin increased $1.8 million, or 61.1% to tool rentals, services and inspection and the expansion of our mud motor fleet contributed the balance of the segments revenue increase. Tool rental and mud motor revenues increased $14.7$4.7 million in 2010 from $2.9 million in 2009 due to further integrationincreased product revenue of the Flotek product family$2.3 million or 19.9% combined with cost efficiencies realization. Raw materials costs and higher market penetration. Our operational integration efforts related to Teledrift have provided the domestic and international oil and gas industry with inexpensive, measurement while drilling (MWD) tools designed and optimized for vertical and horizontal well drilling, increasing Teledrift’s post acquisition contribution to revenues beyond our initial estimates.

Loss from operations was $43.8 million in 2008. Excluding the segment impairment of $59.1 million relating to goodwill and other intangible assets of $55.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively, income from operations before impairment was $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, approximately 170% higher than in 2007. Income from operations before impairment in 2008direct expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues was 15.6% comparedrevenue to income69% in 2010 from 76% in 2009 due to the fixed cost structure of the business and managements continued cost containment efforts.

Income from operations as a percentage of revenuesimproved $1.9 million or 164.4% to $3.1 million in 2007 of 9.9% The increase2010 from $1.2 million in income from operations before impairment was primarily2009 due to increased demand driven by the acquisitionperiod over period increase in the average price of Teledriftnatural gas and our expansion into higher margin tools, motors and services. We made strategic investmentsthe corresponding increase in new North American sales facilities and opened two new repair facilities.drilling activity.

The Drilling Products segment requires higher levels of capital expenditures than our other segments. Capital expenditures in 2008 were approximately $19.8 million for the drilling segment compared

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 24


Back to $8.5 million in 2007.Contents

    Artificial Lift (dollars in thousands)

             
   Years Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Revenue

  $12,480   $18,445   $14,901  

Gross margin

  $2,936   $4,740   $3,841  

Gross margin %

   23.5%  25.7%  25.8%

Income (loss) from operations

  $1,161   $(6,709 $1,381  

Income (loss) from operations %

   9.3%  (36.4%)  9.3%
              

Results for 2009 compared to 2008—Artificial Lift

Artificial Lift revenuesrevenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 werewas $12.5 million, a decrease of $6.0 million, or 32.3%, compared to $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The vast majority of Artificial Lift revenues are derived from coalbed methane (CBM) drilling. CBM drilling activity is highly correlated toAs the price of natural gas and asdeclined throughout the price of natural gas decreased throughout mostmajority of 2009, drilldrilling activity slowed considerably, resulting in a reduction in the volume of units sold.

Gross margin decreased $1.8 million, primarilyor 38.1%, to $2.9 million in 2009 from $4.7 million in 2008 due to reductions indecreased product revenue. Product margins increased slightly to 69% in 2009 from 68% in 2008 accounting for a $0.1 million relative increase in gross margin. Field direct costs decreased by $0.3 million, or 24%, period over period due primarily to cost containment efforts.

Income (loss) from operations increased $7.9 million to $1.2 million in 2009 from a loss from operations of $6.7 million in 2008. The majority of the improvement in income (loss) from operationsvariance is due to a decrease inno goodwill impairment to zerobeing recognized in 2009 fromcompared to $8.6 million of impairment recognized in 2008. In addition,Further, field indirect costs decreased $1.1 million due primarily to management’s cost containment efforts.

Results for 2008 compared to 2007—Artificial Lift

Artificial Lift revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $18.4 million, an increase of 23.8%, compared to $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in revenue is primarily a result of very active coal bed methane drilling in Wyoming, an increase in rod pump sales and a price increase implemented in August in response to an increase in our raw material costs. We opened two new repair facilities in North America to take advantage of market opportunities. We designed these facilities to be scalable to local market conditions.

Loss from operations was $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of impairment charges of $8.6 million relating to goodwill ($5.9 million) and other intangible assets ($2.7 million). Income from operations before impairment in 2008 as a percentage of revenues was 10.0% compared to income from operations as a percentage of revenues in 2007 of 9.3%. Income from operations before impairment in 2008 was $1.8 million or approximately 33.5% higher than income from operations of $1.4 million in 2007. We made strategic investments in this segment by adding two new pump repair facilities and increased our field sales presence.

Consistent with our strategy within our other two segments, we reduced our operating cost structure to align with market conditions while maintaining flexibility to capitalize on a return to a more normalized market. In the first quarter of 2009, we closed one of our facilities in response to the dramatic decrease in our customers drilling activity in coal bed methane and related pricing pressures. Our strategy is to focus on competitive pricing and exceptional service by offering our proprietary downhole gas separator technology and Petrovalve rod pump systems, especially in the international market.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Overview

Our ongoingOverview

Ongoing capital requirements arise primarily fromare driven by the Company’s need to service our debt, to acquire and maintain equipment, toand fund our working capital requirements and to complete acquisitions. We haverequirements. During 2010, the Company funded our capital requirements primarily with operating cash flows, debt borrowings, and by issuing sharesconversions of preferredexercisable and common stock. At December 31, 2009, we have not identified any acquisition candidates, nor are we actively looking for acquisition candidates.contingent warrants.

The challenging economic conditions facingimpact of the oil and gas industry, which began just beforeglobal recession continued to affect the end of 2008, have adversely affected ourCompany’s financial performance and liquidity in 2009. As discussed earlier,2010; however, as oil and natural gas prices, the number of well completions and rig count declined during 2009, wetrended favorably throughout 2010, the Company experienced, lowerand continues to experience, increasing levels of demand for our products and services across all of ourbusiness segments.

At December 31, 2009, we were not2010, the Company was in compliance with certain financial and other covenants in the existing credit agreement for our bank senior credit facility. The lenders had also limited our access under the revolving line of credit to the amount of borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2009. We were in discussions with the current senior credit facility lenders to obtain waivers of the covenant violations, and at the same time were discussing replacement financing and financing arrangements with other lenders. On March 31, 2010, we executed an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Whitebox Advisors, LLC for a $40 million term loan. This new senior credit facility replaced our existing senior credit facility. The new senior credit facility will increase our borrowing costs, but will reduce our scheduled principal amortization requirements during 2010. We

received net proceeds of $6.1 million from the new senior credit facility.debt covenants. The significant terms of our new senior credit facilitythe Company’s term loan are discussed under “Item 8. FinancialItem 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and in Note 1910 “Convertible Notes and Long-Term Debt” in of the Notes to our consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Also, atAt December 31, 2009, we were2010, the Company was not in compliance with the continued listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The noncomplianceNYSE. Noncompliance arose becauseas both our global market capitalization and our stockholders’ equity fell below $50 million.million in 2009. In March 2010, wethe Company submitted a plan of action to the NYSE which outlined ouroutlining management’s plan to achieve compliance with the continued listing standards during the 18-month cure period allowed by the NYSE, which ends in June 2011. During implementation and execution of ourthe plan, ourthe Company’s common stock will continuehas continued to be listed on the NYSE, subject to compliance with other NYSE continued listing requirements. On March 29, 2010, the NYSE agreed to accept ouraccepted the Company’s plan of action.

We hadThe Company has cash and cash equivalents of approximately $6.5$19.9 million at December 31, 2009.2010 primarily attributable to cash flows from operations. In March 2010, wethe Company received net proceeds of $6.1 million from our new senior credit facility. Our capital budgetthe execution of a term loan and refinancing of a portion of the Company’s convertible notes. The Company’s favorable operating cash results, anticipated increases in forecast activity and level of demand for 2010 reducesthe Company’s products and services, as well as, current cash position and future outlook influenced the $2.7 million increase of planned 2011 capital expenditures to $3.4$8.8 million until we achieve improved operating cash flows.from capital expenditures of $6.1 million in 2010.

We believe that we haveThe Company believes sufficient cash reserves are available to meet our anticipated operating and capital expenditure requirements during 2010. However, we continue2011; however, the Company is exploring options to seek additionalsecure more favorable debt and equity funding.financing terms.

Plan of Operations for 20102011

Since the 2008 cyclical peak,During 2010 oil and liquid-rich natural gas prices and drilling activity have declined precipitously,improved directly impacting demand for ourthe Company’s products and services. We experienced operating losses during each of the four quarters in 2009. Forecasting the depth and length of the decline inrecovery cycle of the current cycleeconomy is challenging due to the overlay of the worldwide financial crisis in combination with broad demand weakness in each of our business segments. Duringuncertainty. As the fourth quarter of 2009, the2010 average U.S.annual drilling rig count increased 14.2%to 1,549 rigs, or 42.2%, as compared to the average annual drilling rig count of 1,089 in 2009, the third quarter. During this quarter, weCompany has experienced modestencouraging revenue growth of 3.1%30.6% and an increase in our gross margin percentage of 1.0%,9.9% compared to the third quarter.2009.

Our planThe Company’s 2011 Plan of operations for 2010Operations anticipates a continuing, gradualsustained improvement in industry economic conditions during the year. We are executing a business plan for 2010 thatconditions. The 2011 Plan includes the following:

WorkingEstablish a traditional commercial banking relationship to replace our existing senior credit facility. We were successful in closing on a new senior credit facility on March 31, 2010. This provided usprovide the Company with net proceedsincreased capacity and flexibility to respond to increased demand forecast for 2011.

Invoke the automatic conversion of $6.1 million. The new senior credit facility will increase our borrowing costs, but will reduce our scheduled principal amortization requirements during 2010.

Seeking additional equity funding. In August 2009, we raised $16 million through an offering of convertible preferred stock and stock warrants. The warrants, if all were exercised, would provide us with an additional $14 million of capital (after re-pricing of the outstanding stock warrants for their anti-dilution price protection upon execution of the new senior credit facility). We continue to discussstock.

Explore funding opportunities with ourfinancial advisors. The likelihood of obtaining additional equity funding should increase if the economy continues to improve and if the oil and gas industry experiences growth.growth continues.

ManagingClosely manage capital expenditures untildespite improved cash flows improve. Ourflows. The Company’s capital expenditure budget for 20102011, is approximately $3.4$8.8 million, a decreasean increase of $2.7 million from the $7.0$6.1 million we spent in 2009. We have identified an additional $4.1 million of capital items, primarily for downhole tools, that may be acquired as our cash flows improve.2010.

Integrating oversight and actions of the new senior management team we have assembled. We have created an “Office of the President,” which is striving to increase collaboration throughout our organization.

Investigating and determining whetherContinue expansion ininto foreign markets can provideto realize strategic benefits for ourthe Company’s existing business segments. We will seek outThe Company is actively working with potential business partners that offer a broader geographic reach or new and unique ways to use our existing products and services.

IdentifyingContinue strategic identification and sellingsale of non-core assets and underperforming product lines. We are undertaking a comprehensive review within eachContinue identification of our business segments to identify assets that may no longer meet ouraligned with strategic objectives. In addition to providing liquidity, the sale of non-strategic assets should allow usthe Company to continue to concentrate our efforts and resources on improving and expanding the reach of ourprofitable products.

Continuing to monitor actions we took during 2009, which included closing certain operating locations and reducing personnel levels. Further adjustments may be required in 2010. An expandedContinue emphasis onof certain product lines, which could improve ourresult in further improvement of the Company’s margins. We continueThe Company continues to emphasize the review ofassess both outsourcing and insourcingin-house opportunities to improve our operations. We are also identifying areas where reductions can be made in selling, general and administrative expenses. Ifrealize operational improvements. As economic conditions continueimprove, the Company will hire additional personnel as needed.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 25


Back to improve, we may need to begin hiring additional personnel.Contents

Managing our assets and ongoing operations. Efforts begun in 2009 to actively manage our accounts receivable and inventories will be continued. We have been successful in increasingManage operating cash flowflows through receivables, payables and inventory management. We areThe Company is poised to realize increased cash flows from inventory management as demand for our products increases. Overall management of working capital is being stressed. In addition, we have made a decisionhighlighted. The Company will continue to conserve capital spending,revisit pricing strategies and have identified certain capital expendituresadjust prices in order to attain the most favorable market positions that conditions and environments will be made only after we see improvement in ourallow.

Manage asset utilization to enhance and increase the synergy of operations and sales across all business and liquidity.product lines in order to be prepared and responsive with available resources to meet increasing market demand of products and services.

Enhancing theContinue to emphasize technology used in each of ouradvancements and differentiation across all business segments. We believe that technologyTechnological innovations are important to our future. A longer-term goal is expanding our researchthe Company’s future success. The Company intends to maintain current R&D activities in support of Chemicals’ additives solutions and development activities. It is likely, however, that cash flowDrilling’s product design differentiation to meet the specific demands of the customers and areas where the Company operates.

Implement a new ERP system to more actively manage internal controls, reduce current accounting constraints, will limit expansionand increase operational responsiveness.

Continue to simplify existing tax structure, while taking advantage of research and development activities during 2010.existing NOLs.

Cash Flows

Cash flow metrics from our consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows (in thousands):

2010

2009

2008

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

12,099

$

2,186

$

24,874

Net cash used in investing activities

(600)

(3,699)

(117,178)

Net cash provided by financing activities

1,900

7,812

91,215

Effect of exchange rate fluctuations

(21)

(7)

-

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$

13,378

$

6,292

$

(1,089)

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $2,186   $24,874   $22,613  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (3,699  (117,178  (70,532

Net cash provided by financing activities

   7,812    91,215    48,685  

Effect of exchange rate changes

   (7      6  
             

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  $6,292   $(1,089 $772  
             

Operating Activities

During 2010, 2009 and 2008, and 2007, wethe Company generated cash from operating activities totaling $12.1 million, $2.2 million $24.9 million and $22.6$24.9 million, respectively. The consolidated net loss for 20092010 was $50.7$43.5 million compared to a consolidated net loss of $50.3 million for 2009 and a consolidated net loss of $34.2 million for 2008 and net income of $16.7 million for 2007.

2008. Noncash additions to net incomeitems in 2009 were $49.82010 totaled $55.9 million, consisting primarily of an impairment charge for our intangible assetsa change in warrant liability fair value ($18.521.5 million), asset depreciation and amortization ($14.213.8 million), impairment of long-lived assets and other intangibles ($9.3 million), amortization of deferred financing costs and accretion of debt discount ($6.38.9 million), stock compensation expense ($4.7 million), reduction in the tax benefit of share-based awards ($1.7 million) and a loss on the extinguishment of debt ($1.0 million) offset by a net gain on the sale of assets of $1.3 million and a deferred income tax benefit ($3.6 million). Noncash items in 2009 were $49.4 million, consisting of impairment charge of goodwill ($18.5 million), asset depreciation and amortization ($14.2 million), deferred income tax provision ($10.5 million), amortization of deferred financing costs and accretion of debt discount ($6.4 million), and stock compensation expense ($1.7 million), offset by a net gain on the sale of long-lived assets ($1.4 million). Noncash additions to net incomeitems in 2008 were $62.4$62.5 million, consisting primarily of angoodwill and intangible impairment charge for our goodwillcharges ($67.7 million), depreciation and amortization ($12.8 million), amortization of deferred financing costscost and accretion of debt discount ($4.64.7 million) offset by a deferred tax benefit ($20.9 million), a net gain on the sale of and stock compensation expense ($2.5 million), offset by a gain on the sale of assets ($2.9 million) and a deferred incomeexcess tax benefitbenefits of share based awards ($20.92.0 million).

We experienced a noncash impairment charge of $67.7During 2010 changes in working capital used $0.4 million in 2008 and an increasecash. The decrease in noncash depreciation and amortizationworking capital is primarily due to working capital utilization to meet increased demands of $6.3 million,the improved economic environment offset by the Company’s efforts to match customer collection activity with the payment of vendors. The Company’s use of working capital is evidenced by an increase in our deferredaccounts receivable and inventory balances ($12.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively) offset by reductions in working capital obligations in accounts payable ($5.5 million), accrued liabilities ($4.6 million) and recognized income tax benefit of $19.8 million.

receivable ($3.6 million). During 2009 changes in working capital provided $3.1 million in cash. As ourThe increase in working capital is a result of decisive efforts taken during 2009 as the business declined during 2009, we collectedto collect accounts receivable ($22.6 million) and paidutilize inventory on-hand ($10.8 million) offset by payments of accounts payable and($14.6 million), accrued liabilities that existed at December 31, 2008. We decreased our inventories by $10.8 million or 28.4%($9.8 million) and an increase in income taxes receivables ($6.6 million). During 2008 the changes in working capital used $3.4 million in cash, principally to finance our increase in sales. During 2007, changesmillion. The decrease in working capital provided $2.0 millionis principally due to the Company’s need to finance increased sales through an increase in cash.accounts payable ($12.4 million), accrued liabilities ($5.1 million) and interest payable ($2.4 million) while simultaneously increasing the balance of accounts receivable ($8.5 million) and inventory purchases ($14.5 million).

Investing Activities

During 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007, our2008, capital expenditures were $6.1 million, $6.6 million $23.7 million and $15.7$23.7 million, respectively. Capital expenditures decreasedremained relatively consistent during 2010 and 2009 as our business declined,given the economic uncertainty during both years in addition to the Company closely monitoring and as we closely monitored ourmaintaining available cash. Capital expenditures in 20082010 were for motors, shocks, jars, subs and instruments as well as fleet service vehicles to meet and support increased customer demand. Capital expenditures in 2009 were made to expand ourthe Company’s rental tool fleet (primarily mud motors, MWD tools, shock subs and drilling jars), construct a new, larger facility for our Teledrift operations (which we occupied in February 2009) and purchase additional plant and machinery, primarily machines to repair motors and for use in our research and developmentR&D activities.

During 2008, we usedthe Company expended $98.0 million for ourthe Teledrift acquisition and incurred capital expenditures of Teledrift, and$23.7 million. Cash flows used in investing activities during 2007, we used $53.0 million for our acquisitions of Triumph Drilling, CAVO Drilling Motors and Sooner Energy Services. There were no acquisitions in2010, 2009 and currently, we are not looking for acquisition candidates.2008 were primarily offset with proceeds from the sale of assets of $5.5 million, $2.9 million, and $4.6 million respectively.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 26


Back to Contents

Financing Activities

During 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007, our2008, financing activities provided net cash of $1.9 million, $7.8 million $91.2 million and $48.7$91.2 million, respectively.

We made payments during 2009, 2008 and 2007 on our bankDuring 2010, the Company entered into a new term loan facility totaling $12.8 million, $4.1 million($40.0 million) and $1.2 million, respectively, and net repayments (advances) under our bank revolving line of credit facility totaling ($7.6 million), $27.6 million and $12.5 million, respectively.

In August 2009, we sold convertible preferred stock and stock warrants which generated proceeds of $14.8 million, net of transaction costs of $1.2 million. We used the net proceeds to reduce borrowings under our senior bank credit facility, thereby providing additional availability of credit, and for general corporate purposes.

The 16,000 shares of preferred stock have a total liquidation preference of $16 million. Dividends on the convertible preferred stock accrue at the rate of 15% of the liquidation preference per year and accumulate if not paid quarterly. Each share of convertible preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 and may, at the holder’s option, be converted into shares of our common stock (at a conversion price of approximately $2.30 per common share). We can automatically convert the preferred stock into shares of our common stock under certain conditions, and may redeem the preferred shares forreceived cash beginning in August 2012.

There are approximately 8.0 million warrants to purchase our common shares at $2.45 per share at December 31, 2009. They are currently exercisable and expire in August 2014. There are also approximately 2.5 million warrants to purchase our common shares at $2.31 per share at December 31, 2009. These warrants are currently exercisable and expire in November 2014. On March 31, 2010, as a result of anti-dilution provisionsthe exercise of contingent and exercisable stock warrants ($4.5 million). Repayments of indebtedness included settlement of the Company’s existing senior credit facility with Wells Fargo ($32.0 million) and required principal payments under the Whitebox financing term loan of ($6.4 million). The Company used proceeds received as payment for associated debt issuance costs ($2.0 million). The Company also recognized a reduction in excess tax benefits related to share-based awards ($1.7 million).

During 2009, the Company received net advances ($21.8 million) from existing credit facilities and proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock ($16.0 million). Repayments include payments made on indebtedness ($27.8 million), expenses related to debt issuance costs ($0.9 million), and costs related to issuance of preferred stock and warrants ($1.2 million).

During 2008, the Company issued 5.25% Convertible Notes (“2008 Notes”) due 2028 ($115.0 million), received net advances from existing credit facilities ($6.7 million) and incurred an increase in excess tax benefit related to share-based awards ($2.0 million). Payments include repayments made on indebtedness ($27.6 million), expenses related to the issuance of the 2008 Notes ($5.5 million) and repurchases of treasury stock ($0.3 million).

Non-Cash Impairment

The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level each year in the warrants,fourth quarter and on an interim basis if events occur or circumstances change that could result in a reduction in the exercise pricereporting units fair value below the reporting unit’s carrying value. The Company tests other long-lived and intangible assets for impairment when events or circumstances exist which could result in a decline in the carrying value of all 10.5the assets. Goodwill impairment is recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the fair value. Other long-lived and intangible assets impairment is recognized when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the sum of the assets forecast undiscounted cash flows.

The test for goodwill, other long-lived assets, and intangible assets requires an analysis of the current business environment, future economic market indicators, expectations of future performance, anticipated cost of working capital requirements, projected revenue and operating margins, and market and industry risk rates. Recognition of changes in any of these variables may indicate existence of potential impairment.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company reviewed generation trends of certain long-lived asset groups in response to recovering economic expectations. The Company performed an assessment of the recoverability of identified asset groups based upon the expected revenue generation capability of the asset groups over the remaining useful lives of the asset groups compared to the carrying value of the asset groups. The result of the assessment was discovery of certain asset groups’ inability to recover associated carrying value. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $8.9 million warrants was decreasedrelated to $1.27 per sharelong-lived assets, primarily rental tools within the Drilling segment. Further, during the fourth quarter of 2010 management tested certain definite-lived intangible assets due to changes in exclusive vendor relationships previously held and as a result of common stock issued in connection with our new senior secured credit facility.

In February 2008, we issued $115recognized $0.4 million of 5.25% convertible senior notes due 2028, at par, which generated proceeds of $111.8 million, net of transaction costs of $3.2 million. We used the net proceeds from issuance of the notes to finance the acquisition of Teledrift and for general corporate purposes.

The notes, which mature in February 2028, bear interest at 5.25% per annum. We may redeem all or a portion of the notes for cash beginning in February 2013. Holders of the notes may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes for cash in February 2013, February 2018 and February 2023. Any redemption or repurchase of the notes will be for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes.impairment charges.

The notes are convertible, atCompany anticipates a steady but constant economic recovery into the holder’s option, into shareslatter half of our common stock (at a conversion price2011. The Company also expects to continue to realize benefits from re-leveraging of approximately $22.75 per common share). Upon conversion, we may deliver, at our option, shares of common stock or a combination ofsales through early 2011. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, uncertainties surrounding oil and natural gas prices and the global economy have contributed to conservative cash flows and shares of common stock.

In March 2008, we entered into a new credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,higher risk-adjusted discount rates which were used in the annual 2010 assessment as administrative agent for a syndicate of lenders. This credit agreement provides for a term loan facilitycompared to those used in the interim 2010 and a revolving credit facility. Initial borrowing under this senior credit facility refinanced substantially all of our borrowing under a similar credit agreement with Wells Fargo. Outstanding balances under these loans were to mature and come due on March 31, 2011.annual 2009 assessments.

The term loan facility was limited to the initial advance, and amounts repaid may not be re-borrowed. At December 31, 2009, the outstanding term loan balance was $21.2 million. The amount of credit available under the revolving credit facility was equal to the lesser of a maximum set by the lender or the amount determined through a borrowing base calculation using eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory. At December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility was $10.0 million.

We were obligated to make quarterly principal payments of $2 million on the term loan facility. In addition, mandatory prepayments were required under certain circumstances.

Interest accrued on amounts outstanding under the senior credit facility at variable rates based on, at our election, the prime rate or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin. At December 31, 2009, we had elected to apply the prime rate, plus the applicable margin, to certain portions of the outstanding balance and to apply LIBOR, plus the applicable margin, to other portions of the outstanding balance. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the senior credit facility at December 31,Company believes cost containment actions taken in late 2009 and 2008 was 8.46% and 5.14%, respectively.

Borrowings under the senior credit facilityactively managed throughout 2010 were subject to certain covenants and a material adverse change subjective acceleration clause. The credit agreement contains certain financial and other covenants, including a minimum net worth covenant, a maximum leverage ratio covenant, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, a maximum senior leverage ratio covenant, a covenant restrictingsuccessful. These actions included closing operating locations, curtailing capital expenditures, a covenant limitingreducing personnel levels, discontinuing the incurrenceCompany’s 401(k) matching, and focusing on cost margin management. The Company continues to emphasize collection of additional indebtedness,customer receivables and a covenant restricting acquisitions.inventory management.

During 2009, we amended the credit agreement on four occasions, to provide, among other things, a decrease in the aggregate revolving credit commitment, an increase in the interest rate margin applicable to borrowings, and changes in financial covenants related to minimum net worth, the leverage ratio, the fixed charge coverage ratio, and maximum annual capital expenditures. At December 31, 2009, certain specific financial requirements and ratios were as follows:

Aggregate revolving credit limit

$15 million, but limited to $14.5 million (subject to change)

Interest rate margin

6.5% (above the prime rate or LIBOR)

Minimum net worth, as defined

$42.8 million

Leverage ratio, beginning June 30, 2010

4.75 to 1.0, declining quarterly to 3.75 to 1.0 at December 31, 2010

Senior leverage ratio

Maximum of 2.0 to 1.0

Maximum annual capital expenditures

$11 million for 2010

Our contractually required and actual covenant ratios as of December 31, 2009 were as follows:

Covenant

Required $/Ratio

Actual $/Ratio

Minimum net worth

Minimum $42.8 million$14.8 million

Leverage ratio(1)

Waived72.57 to 1.00

Fixed charge coverage

Minimum 0.75 to 1.000.09 to 1.00

Senior leverage

Maximum 2.00 to 1.001 to 1.00
(1)

Maximum leverage ratio has been waived until June 30, 2010.

At December 31, 2009, we were not in compliance with the minimum net worth, fixed charge coverage ratio, and senior leverage ratio covenants of the credit agreement.

On March 31, 2010, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with new lenders. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provided us with new cash proceeds of $6.1 million. Scheduled cash principal payments have been reduced for 2010 and 2011. We have the option to pay a portion of the interest by addition it to the principal balance, and if certain conditions are met, to make certain payments by issuing our common stock. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement does not contain a revolving line of credit facility or quarterly and annual covenants. Also on March 31, 2010, we entered into our Exchange Agreement in which we expect to exchange $40 million of our convertible senior notes for the aggregate consideration of $36 million in new convertible senior secured notes and $2 million in shares of our common stock.

We are working to lower our working capital needs and have focused on cash collections of our accounts receivable balances and reduction of inventory. In the event that capital required is greater than the amount we have available at the time, we will reduce the expected level of capital expenditures, sell assets and/or seek additional capital. Cash generated by future asset sales may depend on the overall economic conditions of the industries served by these assets, the condition and location of the assets, and the number of interested buyers. Our ability to raise funds in the capital markets through the issuance of additional indebtedness is limited by covenants in our credit facilities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As part of our ongoing business, we

There have not participated inbeen no transactions that generategenerated relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance“structured finance” or special“special purpose entitiesentities” (“SPEs”), which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements orfor other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of December 31, 2009, we are2010, the Company was not involved in any unconsolidated SPEs.

We haveThe Company has not made any guarantees to any of our customers or vendors. We do notvendors nor does the Company have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments, other than operating leases which are discussed below, that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on ourthe Company’s financial condition, changeschange in financial condition, revenues orrevenue, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 27


Back to Contents

Contractual Obligations

Our cash

Cash flows from operations are dependent on a number of factors, including fluctuations in our operating results, accounts receivable collections, inventory management, and the timing of payments for goods and services. As a result,Correspondingly, the impact of contractual obligations on ourthe Company’s liquidity and capital resources in future periods should be analyzed in conjunction with such factors.

Our materialMaterial contractual obligations are composedconsist of repayment of amounts borrowed through our convertible senior notesthe 2008 and long-term2010 Notes, Senior Credit Facility debt, obligations underand capital and operating lease obligations and construction commitments in our chemicals and logistics segment.obligations. Contractual obligations at December 31, 20092010 are as follows (in thousands):

Payments Due by Period

Total

Less than 1 year

2 - 3 years

4 -5 years

More than 5 years

Secured convertible senior notes

$

36,004

$

-

$

36,004

$

-

$

-

Unsecured senior convertible notes

75,000

-

75,000

-

-

Interest expense on convertible notes(1)

12,384

5,828

6,556

-

-

Long-term debt obligations

33,621

6,047

27,574

-

-

Interest expense on long-term debt(2)

6,319

3,784

2,535

-

-

Capital lease obligations

960

407

553

-

-

Operating lease obligations

4,407

1,508

1,396

147

1,356

TOTAL

$

168,695

$

17,574

$

149,618

$

147

$

1,356

(1) Interest at 5.25% with principal repayment on February 15, 2013, the date of the holders’ first put option.

(2) Interest at 12.5% until the principal balance is reduced below $30 million, and then interest at 11.5%. Scheduled principal reductions are considered, with final maturity of the debt on November 1, 2013.

   Payments Due by Period
   Total  Less than
1 year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than
5 years

Convertible senior notes

  $115,000  $  $  $115,000  $

Long-term debt

   31,880   8,717   23,163      

Capital lease obligations

   658   232   359   67   

Operating lease obligations

   6,450   1,763   2,711   546   1,430
                    

Total

  $153,988  $10,712  $26,233  $115,613  $1,430
                    

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.America (“US GAAP”). Preparation of these statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and estimates. Someassumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and revenue and expenses during the reported periods. Significant accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these financial statements. A summary of significant accounting policies can be foundare described in Note 2 - “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We have also identified certainThe Company believes the following accounting policies that we considerare critical due to understanding our businessthe significant, subjective and our results of operations and we have provided below additional information on those policies. The accounting policies we believe to be the most critical to understanding our business and preparing our consolidated financial statements and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments and estimates are describedrequired based upon management’s understanding of the Company’s business and to the Company’s preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Company regularly reviews the judgments, assumptions and estimates related to the critical accounting policies noted below.

Inventory Reserves

Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods and work-in-process. Finished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor and production overhead. Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method. OurFinished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor and production overhead. The Company’s inventory reserve represents the excess of theinventory carrying value over the amount we expectexpected to realizebe realized from the ultimate sale or other disposal of the inventory.

WeThe Company regularly reviewreviews inventory quantities on hand and recordrecords provisions for excess or obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimatedthe Company’s forecast of product demand, historical usage of inventory on hand, market conditions, production orand procurement requirements and technological developments. Significant or unanticipated changes in market conditions or our forecast expectations could impactaffect the amount and timing of provisions for excess or obsolete inventory.

We haveThe Company has not made any material changeschange in the accounting methodology we useused to establish our slow-moving and obsolete reserves during the past three fiscal years. Specific assumptions discussed above are updated at the date of each test to consider current industry and Company-specificCompany specific risk factors. The current business environmentclimate is subject to evolving market conditions and requires significant management judgment to interpretpredict the potential impact to the Company’sCompany assumptions. To the extent that changes in the current business environment result in adjustedadjustments to management projections,assumptions, impairment losses may occurcould be realized in future periods. The potential change in the inventory reserve resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse changeimpact in the Company’s forecast annual demand forecast for products would have increased the recommended inventory reserve by $590,000$0.2 million at December 31, 2009.2010.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue for product sales and services areis recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) products are shipped or services rendered to the customer and all significant risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, (iii) the price to the customer is

fixed and determinable, and (iv) collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. OurThe Company’s products and services are sold with fixed or determinable prices and do not typically include the right of return or other similar provisions or otherany significant post delivery obligations. AccountsRevenue and associated accounts receivable in the Chemicals and Drilling segments are typically recorded at that time net of any discounts.discount when aforementioned conditions are met and a signed proof of obligation is obtained from the customer. Deposits and other funds received in advance of delivery are deferred until the transfer of ownership is complete.

Our logisticsThe Logistics division recognizes revenue of itsrelated to design and construction oversight contracts under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, measured by the percentage of costscost incurred to date proportionate to the total estimated costs of completion. This calculated percentage is applied to the total estimated revenue atupon completion to calculate revenue earned to date. Contract costs include all direct labor and material costs, and thoseas well as, indirect costs related to manufacturing and construction operations. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in job performance andmetrics or estimated profitability, including those arising from contract bonus orand penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may periodically result in revisions to costsincome and incomeexpense estimates and are recognized in the period in which such revisions appear probable. All known or anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full when such amounts become apparent. At December 31, 2009probable and 2008, claims and unapproved change orders were insignificant in value.estimable.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 28


Back to Contents

Within the Drilling Products segment, payments from customers for the costcontractually negotiated replacement and loss of oilfielduse value of rental equipment that is damaged or lost-in-hole (“LIH”) are reflected as revenue withand the carrying value of the related equipment charged to cost of sales. This amountLIH revenue totaled $3.1 million, $2.9 $4.4million and $2.1$4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007,2008, respectively.

Goodwill

We evaluateThe Company annually evaluates the carrying value of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year, andas well as, on an interim basis if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair valueare indicative of the reporting unit below its carrying amount.a potential impairment. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to a significant adverse changechanges in the business climate, unanticipated competition, or a changechanges in the assessmentprojected operating results. Impairment testing consists of future operationsa two-step process. The first step is to compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit’s carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit.

Due to continuing macro-economic conditions affectingunit is less than the oil and gas industry andcarrying value, the financial performance of all of our reporting units, management tested for evidence of goodwill impairment assecond step of the second and the third quarters of 2009. Based on these evaluations, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of approximately $18.5 million related the Teledrift reporting unit in the second quarter of 2009. No additional impairment was recorded as a result of management’s 2009 annual test of goodwill. In the fourth quarter of 2008, as a result of our annual impairment test we recognized $61.5 millionis performed to determine the amount of goodwill impairment.impairment, if any.

We determineThe Company determines fair value using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses, and through use of an independent fixed asset valuation firm,firms, as appropriate. These types of analyses contain uncertainties becauseas they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimatejudgments regarding estimates of industry economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. ItThe Company’s policy is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our current business strategy in light of presentstrategies, taking into consideration current industry and economic conditions, as well as, ourthe Company’s future expectations. Key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model include, among others, discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. Discount rates are determined by using a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”). The WACC considers market and industry data, as well as, Company-specific risk factors for each reporting unit in determining the appropriate discount rate to be used. The discount rate utilized for each reporting unit is indicative of the return an investor would expect to receive for investing in such a similar business. Operational management, considering industry considerations and Company-specificCompany specific historical and projected data, developsresults are used to develop cash flow projections for each reporting unit. Additionally, as part of the market multiple approach, we utilizethe Company utilizes market data from publicly traded entities whose businesses operate in industries consistent with ourcomparable to the Company’s reporting units, adjusted for certain factors that increase comparability.

Specific assumptions discussed above are updated at the date of each test to consider current industry and Company-specific risk factors from the perspective of a market participant. The current business environment is subject to evolving market conditions and requires significant management judgment to interpret the potential impact toDuring the Company’s assumptions. To the extent that changes in the current business environment result in adjusted management projections, impairment losses may occur in future periods.

Our 20092010 annual impairment assessment of the estimated fair value of our Chemical and Logisticsthe Chemicals reporting unit indicated that it exceeded its total asset bookcarrying value by more than $100$81.3 million. The estimated fair value of ourthe Teledrift reporting unit was less than theexceeded total assetcarrying book value by approximately $10 million, triggering$21.3 million. As a result, Step 2 evaluation; however, based on the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s assets, we determined that the implied goodwill exceeded its carrying value by approximately $4 million.evaluation was not required. To evaluate the sensitivity of the fair value calculations of ourthe reporting units, wethe Company applied a hypothetical 10% unfavorable change in ourthe weighted average cost of capital, which would have reduced the estimated fair value of the Chemical and LogisticsChemicals and Teledrift reporting units by approximately $6$2.8 million and $2$2.2 million, respectively. We also evaluatedIn addition, the sensitivity of the fair value calculations by applyingCompany applied a hypothetical 10% reduction in ourto the Company’s market multiples, key financial measures and estimated future cash flows utilized in the Company’s impairment analyses. The results of which would have reduced the estimated fair value of the Chemical and LogisticsChemicals and Teledrift reporting units by approximately $14$20.0 million and $4$11.0 million, respectively. NoneNeither of these sensitivity analyses would have resulted inwere indicative of impairment.

The Company cannot predict the occurrence of certain events or circumstances that could adversely affect the fair value of goodwill. Such events may include, but are not limited to deterioration of the economic environment, particularly as pertaining toin particular the oil and gas industry, increases in ourthe Company’s weighted average cost of capital, material negative changechanges in relationships with significant customers, reductions in valuations of other public companies in ourwithin the Company’s industry, or strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions. If actual results are not consistent with ourthe Company’s current estimates and assumptions, an impairment of goodwill could be required.

Based upon annual and interim evaluations no goodwill impairment was assessed in 2010. Due to continuing macro-economic conditions affecting the oil and gas industry and financial performance of the Company’s reporting units, management tested for evidence of goodwill impairment during the second and third quarters of 2009, in addition to assessment of any annual impairment. A goodwill impairment charge of $18.5 million related to the Teledrift reporting unit was recognized in the second quarter of 2009. An annual impairment assessment during 2008 recognized $61.5 million of required impairment charges.

Long-Lived Assets Other than Goodwill

Long-lived assets other than goodwill consist of property, and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets. Property and equipment are stated at cost. We makeThe Company makes judgments and estimates in conjunction withregarding the carrying value of these assets, including amounts to be capitalized, depreciation and amortization methods,method, useful lives and the valuation of acquired definite-lived intangiblesintangibles.

Long-lived assets other than goodwill are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that itsthe carrying amountvalue of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss shall beis recognized only ifwhen the carrying amountvalue of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds itsis in excess of fair value. The carrying amountvalue of a long-lived asset is deemed not recoverable if it exceedsthe carrying value is in excess of the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. ThatThe assessment is based on the carrying amountvalue of the asset at the date it is tested for recoverability. We complete ourThe Company’s impairment evaluation by performingconsiders internal valuation analyses consideringand other publicly available market information, and usingas well as, the use of an independent valuation firm, as appropriate.

Due to continuing macro-economic conditions affecting the oil and gas industry and the financial performance of all of our reporting units, management tested for evidence of long-lived asset impairment as of the second and the third quarters of 2009. The assessment for impairment focused mainly on the Teledrift and Chemical and Logistics reporting units. No impairment was recorded as a result of this assessment. Management again tested for long-lived asset impairment as of the fourth quarter of 2009 and no impairment was recorded.

Due to the significantly changing business conditions late in the fourth quarter of 2008, we determined that a test of our long-lived assets for potential impairment was appropriate. An analysis was performed in conjunction with our annual goodwill impairment test and we recognized a $6.2 million impairment of definite-lived intangible assets, primarily customer lists and patents.

The development of future net undiscounted cash flow projections requires management projections of future cash flows related to sales and profitability trends and the estimation of remaining useful lifelives of the assets. These projections are consistent with projections we usethe Company uses to internally manage our operations internally.operations. When potential impairment is indicated, a discounted cash flow

valuation model similar to that used to value goodwill at the reporting unit level, incorporating discount rates commensurate with risks associated with each asset, is used to determine the fair value of the asset in order to measure potential impairment. Discount rates are determined by using a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”).WACC. Estimated revenue and WACC are the assumptions most sensitive and susceptible to change in ourthe long-lived asset analysis as they require significant management judgment. We believeThe Company believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 29


Back to Contents

Valuation methodologies utilized to evaluate long-lived assets other than goodwill for impairment were consistent with prior periods. Specific assumptions discussed above are updated at theeach testing date of each test to consider current industry and Company-specific risk factors from the perspective of a market participant. The current business environmentclimate is subject to evolving market conditions and requires significant management judgment to interpret the potential impact toupon the Company’s assumptions. To the extent that changes in the current business environmentclimate result in adjustedadjustments to management projections, impairment losses may occurbe recognized in future periods. To evaluate

During the sensitivityfourth quarter of the fair value calculations of our reporting units, we applied a hypothetical 10% increase in our weighted average cost of capital; this hypothetical change did not result in impairment to any long-lived asset at December 31, 2009. We also evaluated the sensitivity of the fair value calculations by applying a hypothetical 10% reduction in our estimated future cash flows; this hypothetical change would have triggered an2010, management tested for impairment of certain definite-lived intangible assets totaling approximately $16due to the loss of the exclusivity of contractual vendor relationships previously recognized. The Company also tested long-lived rental tool assets due to unfavorable shifts in assumptions regarding historical industry demand of rental assets. Impairment of long-lived rental tool fixed assets of $8.9 million at December 31,and definite long-lived intangible assets of $0.4 million was realized as a result of the 2010 impairment assessment.

Due to continuing macro-economic factors affecting the oil and natural gas industry and the financial performance of the Company’s reporting units, management tested for evidence of long-lived asset impairment during the second and the third quarters of 2009. Assessments for impairment focused on the Teledrift and Chemicals reporting units. No long-lived asset impairment was recorded related to any reporting units for 2009. Due to the changing business conditions identified late in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company determined that a test for potential impairment of long-lived assets was appropriate. An analysis was performed during the fourth quarter 2008 which resulted in the Company recognizing a $6.2 million impairment of definite-lived intangible assets, primarily customer lists and patents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers and grants credit based upon past payment history, financial condition and anticipated industry conditions.expectations. The determination of the collectibilitycollectability of amounts due from our customers requires usthe Company to use estimates and make judgments regarding future events and trends, and includesincluding monitoring our customers’ payment history and current credit worthiness in order to determine that collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured, as well as, considering the overall business climate in which ourthe customers operate. These uncertainties require usthe Company to make frequent judgments and estimates regarding oura customers’ ability to pay amounts due us in order to determine the amount of theassess an appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts. The mainprimary factors utilized in determiningused to quantify the allowance are customer bankruptcies,bankruptcy, delinquency, and management’sthe Company’s estimate of the ability to collect outstanding receivables based on the number of days outstanding. Substantially all of ourthe Company’s customers are engagedinvolved in the energy industry. The cyclical nature of ourthe industry may affect our customers’ operating performance and cash flows, which could impact ourthe Company’s ability to collect on these obligations. Additionally, some of our customers are located in certain international areas that are inherently subject to risks of economic, political and civil instabilities, which may impact our ability to collect these receivables.instability.

While credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, weshould actual write-offs differ from estimates, revisions to the allowance would be recognized. The Company; however, cannot give any assurances that we will continue to experience the sameassume historical credit loss rates that wewill continue.

Warrant Liabilities

The Company evaluates financial instruments for freestanding and embedded derivatives. Warrant liabilities do not have readily determinable fair values and therefore require significant management judgment and estimation. The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of warrant liabilities at the end of each applicable reporting period. Changes in the past.fair value of warrant liabilities during each reporting period are included in the statement of operations. Inputs into the Black-Scholes option-pricing model require estimates, including such items as estimated volatility based upon historical volatilities of the Company’s stock and an identified group of peer companies and estimated life of the financial instruments being fair valued.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value measurements for assets and liabilities the Company considers the principal, or most advantageous market, and assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. The Company categorizes its financial assets and liabilities into a three-tiered fair value hierarchy, based upon the nature of the inputs used in the determination of fair value. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and may be observable or unobservable. Significant judgments and estimates are required, particularly when inputs are based on pricing for similar assets or liabilities, pricing in non-active markets or when unobservable inputs are required.

Income Taxes

Our incomeThe determination of the Company’s tax provision is subject to judgments and estimates due to the complexity and the effect of the tax laws upon the Company due to operations in multiple tax jurisdictions. Income tax expense is based on ourtaxable income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. We provide for income taxes based on the tax laws and rates in effect in the countries in which operations are conducted and income is earned. OurCompany operates. The Company’s income tax expense is expected to fluctuate from year to year as our operations are conducted in different taxing jurisdictions and the amount of pre-tax income fluctuates.

The determination and evaluation of our annual income tax provision involves the interpretation of tax laws in various jurisdictions in which we operate and requires significant judgment and the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events such as the amount, timing and character of income, deductions and tax credits. Changes in tax laws, regulations and ourthe level of operations or profitability in each jurisdiction may impact ourthe Company’s tax liability in any given year.liability. While ourthe annual tax provision is based on the information

available to usthe Company at the time of preparation a number of years may elapse before the ultimate tax liabilities in certain tax jurisdictions are determined.

Current income tax expense reflects an estimate of our income tax liability for the current year, withholding taxes, changes in tax rates and changes in prior year tax estimates as returns are filed.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 30


Back to Contents

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities using the enactedstatutory tax rates in effect at year end. A valuation allowance for deferredis recorded against tax assets is recorded when it is more-likely-than-notmore likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax assetassets will not be realized. We provideAt December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $22.9 million for its deferred tax assets.

The Company periodically identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions. This process involves consideration of the amounts and probabilities of various outcomes that could be realized upon ultimate settlement. Liabilities for uncertain tax positions pursuant to ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”are based on a two-step process. The actual benefits ultimately realized may differ from the Company’s estimates. Changes in facts, circumstances, and new information may require a change in recognition and measurement estimates for prior tax positions. Any changes in estimates are recorded in the results of operations in the period in which the change occurs. At December 31, 2010, the Company performed an evaluation of its various tax positions and concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

Our policy is that we recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

Share-Based Compensation

We have aThe Company has stock-based incentive planplans which includesmay issue stock options, restricted stock and other incentive awards. See Note 13, Capital Stock, to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation program.

Our stock-basedStock-based compensation expense for options is estimated at the grant datedetermined based on the award’san estimated grant-date fair value. The fair value asis calculated byusing the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM)Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized pro-ratably as expense over the requisite service period. The BSMoption-pricing model requires various judgmentalthe input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected volatility and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. In addition, we are required to estimate the Company estimates an expected forfeiture rate and only recognizerecognizes expense for those shares expected to vest. We estimate theThe estimated forfeiture rate is based onupon historical experience. To the extent ourthat the actual forfeiture rate is different from ourthe estimate, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted accordingly.

Loss Contingencies

The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the course of business. Management considers the likelihood of any loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as, the Company’s ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset has been impaired and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for loss contingencies have not been recorded during the past three years. The Company regularly evaluates current information available to determine whether such accruals are necessary.

Seasonality

Due to higher customer spending near theyear end, of the year by customers the results of operations of the Chemical and LogisticsChemicals segment are generally stronger in the fourth quarter of the year than at the beginning of the year. The results of operations of ourthe Artificial Lift segment are generally weaker in the second quarter of the year due to restrictions on drilling on federal lands due to the breeding seasonseasons of certain endangered bird species.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,

Recent accounting pronouncements which may impact the Company are described in Note 2 Summary– “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements”Policies” to the audited consolidated financial statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 31


Back to Contents

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We areITEM 7A  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, and, to a limited extent, commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. Market risk is measured as the potential negative impact on earnings, cash flows or fair values resulting from a hypothetical change in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates overduring the next year. We manageThe Company manages the exposure to market risks at the corporate level. The portfolio of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities is monitored and adjusted to provide liquidity necessary to satisfy anticipated short-term needs. OurThe Company’s risk management policies allow the use of specified financial instruments for hedging purposes only; speculation on interest rates or foreign currency rates is not permitted. We doThe Company does not consider any of these risk management activities to be material.

At December 31, 2010, the Company does not have significant market risk related to changes in interest rates, commodity prices or foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

We areThe Company was exposed to the impact of interest rate changesfluctuations on the outstanding indebtedness under ourthe previous Wells Fargo senior credit facility which hashad variable interest rates. As required by the previous senior credit facility, we havethe Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement on 50% of the term loan facility to partially reduce our exposure to interest rate risk. The impact onWells Fargo senior credit facility was repaid in March 2010; accordingly, the average outstanding balance of our variable rate indebtedness during 2009 from a hypothetical 200 basis point increase in interest rates, net ofCompany terminated the interest rate swap positions, would be an increaseand recognized a loss of $0.1 million in interest expense of approximately $0.2 million.2010 upon termination.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMITEM 8  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Flotek Industries, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Flotek Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and the related consolidated statement of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Flotek Industries, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Flotek Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We were not engaged to examine management’s assertion about the effectiveness of Flotek Industries Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for share lending arrangements on January 1, 2010.

/s/ Hein & Associates, LLP

Houston, Texas

March 16, 2011

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 32


Back to Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Flotek Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance SheetsSheet of Flotek Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Stockholders’ Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-yeartwo-year period ended December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Flotek Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-yeartwo-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ UHY LLP

Houston, Texas

May 21, 2010, except for the effect in 2009 and 2008 of the change in the method of accounting for a share lending arrangement, described in Note 2, which is as of March 31, 2010

16, 2011

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 33


Back to Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheets

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSFLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

  December 31, 
  2009     2008 
  (in thousands, except share data) 

(in thousands, except share data)

December 31,

2010

2009

ASSETS      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $6,485      $193  

$

19,863

$

6,485

Restricted cash

   10       9  

150

10

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $948 and $1,465 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively

   14,612       37,205  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $262 and $948 at December 31 2010 and 2009, respectively

27,310

14,612

Inventories

   27,232       38,027  

27,845

27,232

Deferred tax assets, current

   762       917  

Deferred tax assets, net

575

762

Income tax receivable

   6,607         

2,973

6,607

Other current assets

   871       1,291  

1,041

871

          

Total current assets

   56,579       77,642  

79,757

56,579

Property and equipment, net

   60,251       66,835  

42,524

60,251

Goodwill

   26,943       45,443  

26,943

26,943

Deferred tax assets, net

117

-

Other intangible assets, net

   34,837       38,015  

35,466

35,128

Deferred tax assets, less current portion

          6,640  
          

Total assets

  $178,610      $234,575  
          
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      

TOTAL ASSETS

$

184,807

$

178,901

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:

      

Accounts payable

  $8,021      $22,666  

$

13,520

$

8,021

Accrued liabilities

   4,941       13,509  

11,956

4,941

Interest payable

   2,672       2,402  

2,185

2,672

Income taxes payable

          979  

Current portion of long-term debt

   8,949       9,017  

6,454

8,949

          

Deferred tax liabilities, net

117

-

Total current liabilities

   24,583       48,573  

34,232

24,583

Convertible senior notes, net of discount

   95,601       90,803  

Convertible notes, net of discount

98,555

95,601

Long-term debt, less current portion

   23,589       29,478  

28,127

23,589

Deferred tax liabilities

   3,203         
          

Warrant liability

26,193

4,729

Deferred tax liabilities, net

1,153

3,203

Total liabilities

   146,976       168,854  

188,260

151,705

Commitments and contingencies

      

Stockholders’ equity:

      

Cumulative convertible preferred stock at accreted value, $0.0001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 16,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009

   6,943         

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 24,168,292 and 23,362,907, respectively, at December 31, 2009; 23,174,286 and 22,782,091, respectively, at December 31, 2008

   2       2  

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

Cumulative convertible preferred stock at accreted value, $0.0001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 11,205 and 16,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively; liquidation preference of $1,000 per share

7,280

6,943

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized; 36,753,891 shares issued and 35,327,893 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010; 24,168,292 shares issued and 23,362,907 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009

4

2

Additional paid-in capital

   88,749       76,788  

103,408

84,020

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   118       125  

97

118

Accumulated deficit

   (63,633     (10,697

(113,350)

(63,342)

Treasury stock at cost, 346,270 and 158,697 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively

   (545     (497
          

Total stockholders’ equity

   31,634       65,721  
          

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $178,610      $234,575  
          

Treasury stock, at cost; 565,199 and 346,270 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively

(892)

(545)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

(3,453)

27,196

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

$

184,807

$

178,901

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 34


Back to Contents

Consolidated Statements of Operations

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSFLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009 2008 2007 
  (in thousands, except share and per share data) 

(in thousands, except per share data)

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Revenue

  $112,550   $226,063   $158,008  

$

146,982

$

112,550

$

226,063

Cost of revenue

   83,166    135,307    94,561  

94,012

83,166

135,307

          

Gross margin

   29,384    90,756    63,447  

52,970

29,384

90,756

          

Expenses:

    

Selling, general and administrative

   36,943    46,311    30,639  

41,861

36,943

46,311

Depreciation and amortization

   4,926    5,570    2,273  

4,543

4,926

5,570

Research and development

   2,118    1,931    849  

1,441

2,118

1,931

Impairment of long-lived assets

8,898

-

-

Loss on disposal of long-lived assets

2,104

-

-

Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets

   18,500    67,695      

390

18,500

67,695

          

Total expenses

   62,487    121,507    33,761  

59,237

62,487

121,507

          

Income (loss) from operations

   (33,103  (30,751  29,686  

Loss from operations

(6,267)

(33,103)

(30,751)

Other income (expense):

    

Loss on extinguishment of debt

(995)

-

-

Interest expense

   (15,431  (13,813  (3,501

(19,399)

(15,524)

(13,894)

Other income (expense), net

   (155  (96  956  
          

Total other income (expense)

   (15,586  (13,909  (2,545

Income (loss) before income taxes

   (48,689  (44,660  27,141  

Other financing costs

(816)

-

-

Change in fair value of warrant liability

(21,464)

465

-

Other expense, net

(69)

(155)

(96)

Total other expense

(42,743)

(15,214)

(13,990)

Loss before income taxes

(49,010)

(48,317)

(44,741)

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

   (2,016  10,499    (10,414

5,545

(2,016)

10,499

          

Net income (loss)

   (50,705  (34,161  16,727  

NET LOSS

(43,465)

(50,333)

(34,242)

Accrued dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock

   (2,231        

(6,543)

(2,231)

-

          

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

  $(52,936 $(34,161 $16,727  
          

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

    

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $(2.70 $(1.78 $0.91  

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $(2.70 $(1.78 $0.88  
          

Weighted average common shares used in computing basic earnings (loss) per common share

   19,595,000    19,157,000    18,338,000  

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share

   19,595,000    19,157,000    18,958,000  
          

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$

(50,008)

$

(52,564)

$

(34,242)

Basic and diluted loss per common share:

Basic and diluted loss per common share

$

(1.94)

$

(2.68)

$

(1.79)

Weighted average common shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per common share

25,731

19,595

19,157

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 35


Back to Contents

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYFLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

(in thousands)

 Common Stock Preferred Stock Treasury Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Retained
Earnings

(Accumulated
Deficit)
  Total 
 Shares Value Shares Value Shares Cost 

Balance December 31, 2006

 17,694 $1  $    $   $46,661   $37   $6,810   $53,509  

Net income

                       16,727    16,727  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

                   8        8  
            

Comprehensive income

           16,735  

Common stock issued for acquisition

 143              1,855            1,855  

Treasury stock purchased

         70  (190              (190

Restricted stock forfeited

 2        2                    

Stock options and warrants exercised

 627              1,502            1,502  

Restricted stock granted

 337                            

Tax benefit of share-based awards

               2,473            2,473  

Stock compensation expense

               1,650            1,650  

Adoption of FIN 48

                       (73  (73
                          

(in thousands)

Common Stock

Preferred Stock

Treasury Stock

Additional

Paid-in Capital

Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Retained Earnings

(Accumulated Deficit)

Total

Shares Issued

Value

Shares

Value

Shares

Cost

Balance December 31, 2007

 18,803  1      72  (190  54,141    45    23,464    77,461  

18,803

$

1

-

$

-

72

$

(190)

$

54,141

$

45

$

23,464

$

77,461

Net loss

                       (34,161  (34,161

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(34,242)

(34,242)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

                   80        80  

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

80

-

80

            

Comprehensive loss

           (34,081

(34,162)

Common stock issued under share lending agreement

 3,800  1                        1  

3,800

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Treasury stock purchased

         17  (307              (307

-

-

-

-

17

(307)

-

-

-

(307)

Restricted stock forfeited

         70                    

-

-

-

-

70

-

-

-

-

-

Stock options exercised

 519              905            905  

519

-

-

-

-

-

905

-

-

905

Restricted stock granted

 52                            

52

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Tax benefit of share-based awards

               2,020            2,020  

-

-

-

-

-

-

2,020

-

-

2,020

Stock compensation expense

               2,500            2,500  

2,500

2,500

Convertible debt bifurcation related to change in accounting principle, net of tax

               17,222            17,222  
                          

Convertible debt bifurcation; net of tax

-

-

-

-

-

-

17,222

-

-

17,222

Fair value of share lending agreement

-

-

-

-

-

-

465

-

-

465

Balance December 31, 2008

 23,174  2      159  (497  76,788    125    (10,697  65,721  

23,174

2

-

-

159

(497)

77,253

125

(10,778)

66,105

Net loss

                       (50,705  (50,705

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(50,333)

(50,333)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

                   (7      (7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(7)

-

(7)

            

Comprehensive loss

           (50,712

(50,340)

Sale of preferred stock and detachable warrants

    16  10,806         5,194            16,000  

-

-

16

10,806

-

-

-

-

10,806

Issuance costs of preferred stock and detachable warrants

               (1,199          (1,199

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,199)

-

-

(1,199)

Accretion of discount on preferred stock

      1,331                 (1,331    

-

-

-

1,331

-

-

-

-

(1,331)

-

Preferred stock dividends

                       (900  (900

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(900)

(900)

Beneficial conversion discount on preferredstock

      (5,194       5,194              

Beneficial conversion discount on preferred

-

-

-

(5,194)

-

-

5,194

-

-

-

Restricted stock forfeited

         152                    

-

-

-

-

152

-

-

-

-

-

Stock options exercised

 100              30            30  

100

-

-

-

-

-

30

-

-

30

Restricted shares issued and treasury stock purchased in payment of 2008 bonuses

 471        35  (48  481            433  

Restricted shares issued and treasury stock purchased in payment of 2008 bonus

471

-

-

-

35

(48)

481

-

-

433

Restricted stock granted

 423                            

423

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reduction in tax benefit of share-based awards

               (195          (195

-

-

-

-

-

-

(195)

-

-

(195)

Stock compensation expense

               1,731            1,731  

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,731

-

-

1,731

Tax benefit related to convertible debt bifurcation

               725            725  

-

-

-

-

-

-

725

-

-

725

                          

Balance December 31, 2009

 24,168 $2 16 $6,943   346 $(545 $88,749   $118   $(63,633 $31,634  

24,168

2

16

6,943

346

(545)

84,020

118

(63,342)

27,196

                          

Net loss

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(43,465)

(43,465)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(21)

-

(21)

Comprehensive loss

`

(43,486)

Common stock issued in payment of debt issuance costs

4,042

1

-

-

-

-

5,095

-

-

5,096

Common stock issued in exchange of convertible notes

1,569

-

-

-

-

-

1,992

-

-

1,992

Accretion of discount on preferred stock

-

-

-

5,132

-

-

-

-

(5,132)

-

Preferred stock dividends, net of forfeitures

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,411)

(1,411)

Stock warrants exercised

3,923

1

-

-

-

-

4,452

-

-

4,453

Stock options exercised

140

-

-

-

-

-

114

-

-

114

Restricted stock granted

827

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Restricted stock forfeited

-

-

-

-

23

-

-

-

-

-

Treasury stock purchased

-

-

-

-

196

(347)

-

-

-

(347)

Reduction in tax benefit related to share-based awards

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,744)

-

-

(1,744)

Stock compensation expense

-

-

-

-

-

-

4,684

-

-

4,684

Conversion of preferred stock into common stock

2,085

-

(5)

(4,795)

-

-

4,795

-

-

-

Balance December 31, 2010

36,754

$

4

11

$

7,280

565

$

(892)

$

103,408

$

97

$

(113,350)

$

(3,453)

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 36


Back to Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009 2008 2007 
  (in thousands) 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income (loss)

  $(50,705 $(34,161 $16,727  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

(in thousands)

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Cash flows from operating activities :

Net loss

$

(43,465)

$

(50,333)

$

(34,242)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

   14,186    12,844    6,537  

13,768

14,186

12,844

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   1,459    1,030      

3,914

1,552

1,111

Accretion of debt discount

   4,798    3,580      

4,946

4,798

3,580

Equity income from affiliate

           (509

Change in fair value of warrant liability

21,464

(465)

-

Gain on sale of assets

   (1,365  (2,881  (204

(1,261)

(1,365)

(2,881)

Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets

   18,500    67,695      

Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and fixed assets

9,289

18,500

67,695

Stock compensation expense

   1,731    2,500    1,650  

4,684

1,731

2,500

Reduction in (excess) tax benefit of share-based awards

   195    (2,020  (2,473

Deferred income tax provision (benefit)

   10,500    (20,881  (1,101

Reduction in excess tax benefit related to share-based awards

1,744

195

(2,020)

Deferred income tax (benefit) provision

(3,611)

10,500

(20,881)

Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate swap

   (199  533      

-

(199)

533

Loss on extinguishment of debt

995

-

-

Change in current assets and liabilities:

    

Restricted cash

   (1  (1  (9

(140)

(1)

(1)

Accounts receivable

   22,593    (8,543  (44

(12,698)

22,593

(8,543)

Inventories

   10,795    (14,522  671  

(613)

10,795

(14,522)

Income tax receivable

3,634

(6,607)

-

Other current assets

   (6,158  (233  (49

(170)

449

(233)

Accounts payable

   (14,645  12,415    (2,378

5,499

(14,645)

12,415

Accrued liabilities

   (9,768  5,124    3,834  

4,607

(9,768)

5,124

Interest payable

   270    2,395    (39

(487)

270

2,395

          

Net cash provided by operating activities

   2,186    24,874    22,613  
          

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

12,099

2,186

24,874

Cash flows from investing activities :

Proceeds from sale of assets

   2,858    4,554    1,274  

5,460

2,858

4,554

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

       (97,973  (53,028

-

-

(97,973)

Purchase of patents

   (2  (48  (2,521

-

(2)

(48)

Other assets

           (585

Capital expenditures

   (6,555  (23,711  (15,672

(6,060)

(6,555)

(23,711)

          

Net cash used in investing activities

   (3,699  (117,178  (70,532
          

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

(600)

(3,699)

(117,178)

Cash flows from financing activities :

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

   30    905    1,502  

3

30

905

Purchase of treasury stock

   (48  (307  (190

(236)

(48)

(307)

Proceeds from borrowings

   21,807    6,729    119,057  

40,000

21,807

6,729

Proceeds from convertible debt offering

       115,000      

-

-

115,000

Debt issuance costs

   (819  (5,485    

(2,004)

(819)

(5,485)

Excess (reduction in) tax benefit of share-based awards

   (195  2,020    2,473  

Reduction in excess tax benefit related to share-based awards

(1,744)

(195)

2,020

Repayments of indebtedness

   (27,764  (27,647  (74,157

(38,572)

(27,764)

(27,647)

Proceeds from preferred stock offering

   16,000          

-

16,000

-

Issuance costs of preferred stock and detachable warrants

   (1,199        

-

(1,199)

-

          

Net cash provided by financing activities

   7,812    91,215    48,685  
          

Proceeds from exercise of warrants

4,453

-

-

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

1,900

7,812

91,215

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (7      6  

(21)

(7)

-

          

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   6,292    (1,089  772  

13,378

6,292

(1,089)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year

   193    1,282    510  

6,485

193

1,282

          

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year

  $6,485   $193   $1,282  
          

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF YEAR

$

19,863

$

6,485

$

193

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 37


Back to Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNOTE 1

Note 1—Organization and Nature of Operations

Flotek Industries, Inc. (“Flotek” or the “Company”) is a technology drivendiversified global developer and supplier of drilling and production related products and services toservices. The Company’s strategic focus, and that of all wholly owned subsidiaries, includes oilfield specialty chemicals and logistics, down-hole drilling tools and down-hole production tools used in the energy and mining industries. The core focus of Flotek and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) is oilfield specialty chemicals and logistics, downhole drilling tools and downhole production tools. ItCompany also manages automated bulk material handling, loading facilities and blending facilities.capabilities for a variety of bulk materials. The Company’s products and services helpenable customers to drill wells more efficiently, to increase production from existing wells and to decrease well operating costs. Major customers include leading oilfield service providers, major andas well as, independent oil and gas exploration and production companies, and onshore and offshore drilling contractors.

The Company’s headquarters are locatedCompany is headquartered in Houston, Texas, and it has operationsoperational locations in Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, Louisiana,North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Wyoming and Thethe Netherlands. Products are marketed domestically and internationally in over 20 countries.

Flotek was originallyinitially incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia on May 17, 1985. On October 23, 2001, Flotek changed its corporate domicile to the state of Delaware.

Note 2—NOTE 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis

Accounting Principles

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of Presentation:America (“US GAAP”).

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Flotek Industries, Inc. and its wholly-ownedall wholly owned subsidiary corporations. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company does not have investments in any unconsolidated subsidiaries.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an original maturitymaturities of three months or less.less at the date of purchase.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:TradeAccounts

Accounts receivable arise from product sales, product rentals and services and are stated at net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV incorporates an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable are recorded atwhich estimates the invoiced amounts and do not bear interest.probability of collectability. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers and grants credit based upon past payment history, financial condition and anticipated industry conditions. The determination of the collectibility of amounts due from customers requires management to use estimates and make judgments regarding future events and trends, and includes monitoring customers’ payment history and current credit worthinessregularly evaluates accounts receivable in order to determine that collectibility is reasonably assured, as well as consideringestimate the overall business climate in which they customers operate. These uncertainties requiresprovision for doubtful accounts and corresponding charge to operating expense. The valuation allowance considers the Company to make frequent judgments and estimates regarding a customer’s ability to pay amounts due us in order to determine the amountage of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company writes off specific accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible.balance, individual customer circumstances, credit conditions and historical write-offs and collections.

Substantially all of the Company’s customers are engaged in the energy industry. The cyclical nature of the energy industry maycan affect customers’ operating performance and cash flows, which coulddirectly impact the Company’s ability to collect on theseoutstanding obligations. Additionally, somecertain customers are located in certain international areas that are inherently subject to risks of economic, political and civil instabilities,instability, which maycan impact collectibilitythe collectability of these receivables.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts areis as follows (in thousands):

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Beginning balance

$

948

$

1,465

$

1,354

Charge to cost and expense

94

45

215

Write-offs

(780)

(562)

(104)

Ending balance

$

262

$

948

$

1,465

   Beginning
Balance
  Additions  Write-offs  Ending
Balance
     Charged to
Costs and
Expense
  Charged to
Other
Accounts (a)
   

Years Ended December 31,

               

2007

  $562  $460  $478  $(146 $1,354

2008

   1,354   195   20   (104  1,465

2009

   1,465   45      (562  948

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 38

(a)

Back to Contents

Inventories

Amounts represent amounts obtained from acquisitions.

Inventories: Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods.goods and are stated at the lower of cost, using the weighted-average cost method, or market. Finished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor and production overhead. The Company determines the value of acquired work-in-process inventories by estimating the selling prices of finished goodsregularly reviews inventory on hand, in order to identify any excess inventory or replacement cost less the sum of (a) costobsolescence. A provision for identified excess or obsolete inventory is recorded based upon, but not limited to, complete, (b) costs of disposal, and (c) a reasonable profit allowance for the completing and selling effortforecasted product demand, historical trends, market conditions, management’s knowledge of the Company based on profit for similar finished goods. Inventories are carried at the lower of costindustry, production or market using the weighted-average cost method. The Company maintains a reserve for slow-movingprocurement requirements and obsolete inventories, which is reviewed for adequacy on a periodic basis.technological developments and advancements.

Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment are stated at cost. The cost of ordinary maintenance and repairsrepair is charged to operations,operating expense, while replacementsreplacement of critical components and major improvements are capitalized. Depreciation or amortization is provided onof property and equipment, including assets held under capital leases, is calculated using the straight-line method of depreciation over the followingasset’s estimated useful lives:

life:

Buildings and leasehold improvements

3-39

2-30 years

Machinery, equipment and rental tools

3-7

3-10 years

Furniture and fixtures

3-7

3 years

Transportation equipment

3-5

2-5 years

Computer equipment

3-5

3-7 years

The Company reviews long-lived assetsProperty and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amountvalue of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. RecoverabilityIndicative events or circumstances include significant decline in market value and significant change in business climate. Loss of assets to be held and usedimpairment is measured by a comparisonrecognized when the carrying value of an asset exceeds the forecasted undiscounted future cash flows from the use of the asset, inclusive of eventual disposition. The amount of impairment loss realized is the excess of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds eithervalue over the fair value. Fair value is generally determined by an appraisal or the estimatedby using a discounted cash flows of the assets, whichever is more readily measurable.flow analysis. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amountvalue or the fair value less coststhe cost to sell. Upon sale or other disposition of an asset, the Company recognizes a gain or loss on disposal measured as the difference between the net carrying value of the asset and the net proceeds received.

Goodwill:Goodwill

Goodwill representsis the excess of the purchase price and related costscost of an acquired entity over the fair value of net tangible andassigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combinations.combination. Goodwill is not subject to amortization, but rather is required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis,annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicateare indicative of a potential impairment. Thesedecline in fair value below corresponding carrying value. Events or circumstances may include anany adverse change in the business climate or a change in the assessment of future operations of a reporting unit.operational considerations.

Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two step process at a reporting unit level. This requires a comparison ofThe first step is to compare the identified reporting unit’s fair value to carrying value. Determination of eachfair value considers a combined market based approach and discounted cash flow income approach. If a reporting unit that has goodwill associated with its operations with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If this comparison reflects impairment, then the loss would be measured as the excess of recorded goodwill over its

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

implied fair value. Impliedunit’s fair value is less than the excessreporting units’carrying value, a second step is performed to quantify the amount, if any, of impairment loss. The second step in essence compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit overunit’s goodwill with the fairreporting unit’s carrying value of all recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities. The Company performsgoodwill. If the required annual goodwill impairment evaluation in the fourth quarter.

The evaluation of goodwill for possible impairment includes estimating the faircarrying value of each of the reporting units which haveunit’s goodwill associated with their operations. To determine itsexceeds the implied fair value estimates, the Company uses the income approach based on discounted cash flow analyses, combined with market-related valuation models, including earnings multiples of publicly traded entity businesses that operate in industries consistent with the Company’s reporting units, and valuation comparisons of recent public sale transactions of similar businesses. Although the Company believes that the estimates and assumptions used were reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. If it is determined that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than the carrying value of its goodwill.excess.

The Company has four reporting units, of which only two, Chemicals and Logistics and Teledrift, have an unamortized goodwill balance at December 31, 2009.Other Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets:The Company’sOther intangible assets have determinable lives and primarily consist of customer relationships, but also include purchased patents aand purchased brand name and a purchased contractnames with favorable terms. The Company has no acquired intangible assets with indefinitedeterminable lives. The cost of an intangible assets with determinable livesasset is amortized on ausing the straight-line basismethod over thean estimated period of economic benefit. No residual value is estimated for these intangible assets. Amortizablebenefit, ranging from two to 20 years. Intangible asset lives are adjusted whenever there is a change in the estimated period of economic benefit.benefit becomes apparent. No residual value is assigned to intangible assets; however, the Company capitalizes costs incurred to renew or extend the term of an intangible asset. The Company has no intangible assets with indefinite lives.

Intangible assets with definite lives are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. These conditions may include an economic downturn, an adverserecoverable, including any change in the extent or manner in which the asset is being used a decline in stock value for a sustained period of time, or a change in the assessment of future operations. Anoperational considerations. The loss on impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the long-lived intangible asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.

When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an intangible asset may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value by preparing estimates of future revenue, margins and cash flows. If the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. The impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amountvalue of the intangible asset exceeds the fair value.

Fair Value Measurements:The Company accounts for its assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs invalue is determined using various accepted fair value measurements and requires certain related disclosures. The hierarchy prioritizesmethodologies, including the inputsdiscounted cash flow methodology.

Warrant Liabilities

Warrant liabilities do not have readily determinable fair values. At the end of fair value measurements into one of three levels. “Level 1” measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. “Level 2” measurements use significant other observable inputs. “Level 3” measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a companyeach reporting period, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to develop its own assumptions. In recordingestimate the fair value of warrant liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the warrant liabilities are recognized in the statement of operations.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company categorizes financial assets and liabilities companies mustusing a three-tier fair value hierarchy, based upon the nature of the inputs used in the determination of fair value. Inputs refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use the most reliable measurement available.to value an asset or liability and may be observable or unobservable.

Revenue Recognition:Recognition

Revenue for product sales and services areis recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) products are shipped or services rendered to the customer and all significant risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, (iii) the price to the customer is fixed and determinable and (iv) collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. Products and services are sold with fixed or determinable prices and do not include right of return or other similar provisions or other significant post delivery obligations. Deposits and other funds received in advance of delivery are deferred until the transfer

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

of ownership is complete. Shipping and handling costs are reflected in cost of revenue. Taxes collected are not included in revenue, andrather taxes are accrued for future remittance to governmental authorities.

The Logistics groupdivision recognizes revenue from its design and construction oversight contracts under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, measured by the percentage of costs“costs incurred to datedate” to the total“total estimated costs of completion. This percentage is applied to the total“total estimated revenue at completioncompletion” to calculate proportionate revenue earned to date. Contract costs include allContracts for services are inclusive of direct labor and material costs, and thoseas well as, indirect costs related to manufacturing and constructionof operations. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in job performance metrics and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract bonus or penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which such revisions appear probable. All knownKnown or anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full when such amounts become apparent.are both probable and estimable. Bulk material transloadloading revenue is recognized as services are performedperformed.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 39


Back to Contents

Drilling revenue is recognized upon receipt of a customer signed and dated field billing ticket. Customers are charged contractually agreed amounts for the customer.

Within the Drilling Products segment amounts billed to customers for the cost of oilfield rental equipment that is damaged or lost-in-hole (“LIH”). LIH proceeds are reflectedrecognized as revenue withand the associated carrying value of the related equipmentis charged to cost of sales. This amountLIH revenue totaled $3.1 million, $2.9 million $4.4 million and $2.1$4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.

The Company generally is generally not contractually obligated to accept returns, except forwith the exception of defective products. If a product isProducts determined to be defective are typically replaced or the Company will replace the product or issuecustomer is issued a credit memo. Based on historical return rates, no provision is made for returns at the time of sale. All costs associated with product returns are expensed as incurred.

Foreign Currency:TheCurrency

Foreign subsidiary stand alone financial statements are prepared in the local currency with the exception of those subsidiaries that have elected the US dollar as the functional currencies of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are the respective local currencies.currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S.US dollars at exchange rates in effect as of the end of theidentified reporting period.periods. Revenue and expense itemstransactions are translated atusing the average monthly exchange ratesrate for the reporting period. The resultingResultant translation adjustments are recordedrecognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity.

Research and Development Costs:Costs

Expenditures for research activities relating to product development and improvement are charged to expense as incurred.

Income Taxes:The Company’s incomeTaxes

Income tax expense is based ona factor of income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to it in the various jurisdictions in which it operates.the Company does business. The Company provides for income taxes based on the tax laws and rates in effect in the countries in which operations are conducted and income is earned. The Company’s income tax expense is expected to fluctuate from year to year as operations are conducted in different taxing jurisdictions and the amount of pre-tax income fluctuates.

The determination and evaluation of the Company’s annual income tax provision involvesis based upon the interpretation of tax laws in variousnumerous jurisdictions in which itthe Company operates and requires significant judgment and the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events, such asincluding the amount, timing and character of income, deductions and tax credits. ChangesChange in tax laws, regulations and the Company’s level of operations or profitability in each jurisdiction may impact itsimpacts the final tax liability in any given year. While theliability. The Company’s annual tax provision is based on theavailable information available to it at the time a number of estimation; however, years may elapse before the ultimaterecorded tax liabilities in certain tax jurisdictions are determined.realized.

The Company’s current income tax expensebenefit reflects an estimate of itscurrent year income tax liability for the current year, withholding taxes,liability/benefit, as well as, changes in applicable tax rates and changes in prior year tax estimates as returns are filed.other estimates. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the anticipatedexpected future tax effects of temporary differences betweenresulting from differences in the

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

financial statement basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities calculated using the enactedstatutory tax rates in effect at year end.the end of the period presented. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more-likely-than-notprobable that the benefit from theof a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company provides for uncertain tax positions pursuant to the provisions of ASC 740. The Company’s policy recognizes interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. The Company and its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ending December 31, 2006 through 2009.current accounting standards.

It isIt’s the Company’s intentionintent to permanently reinvest all undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries in suchnon-US subsidiaries. Accordingly, the Company has not provided for U.S.US deferred taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S.non-US subsidiaries. If a distribution isAny distributions made to us from the undistributed earnings of thesenon-US subsidiaries the Company could be required to recordare liable for additional taxes. Because theThe Company cannot predict when, if at all, it will make a distribution of these undistributed earnings itand is unable to make a determination of the amount offor unrecognized deferred tax liability.taxes.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share:Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computedcalculated by dividing net income (loss) availableattributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reported period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding andoutstanding; for the period reported inclusive of potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding,share equivalents, if the effect is dilutive. PotentialPotentially dilutive common sharesshare equivalents consist of incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the stock options and warrants and upon conversion of the convertible senior notes and convertible preferred stock.

Debt Issuance Costs: The costsCosts

Costs related to thedebt issuance of debt are capitalized and amortized toas interest expense over the term of the related debt using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, overmethod. Prepayment of debt proportionately accelerates the maturity periodsrecognition of amortization of debt issuance cost and interest expense associated with the related debt.payment.

Stock-Based Compensation:The Company accountsCompensation

Stock-based compensation expense for its stock compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation” for equity-based payments to employees. The guidance incorporated by ASC Topic 718 covers share-based payments, related to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock awards, to beis recognized in the financial statements based on their grant-date fair values. The Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Estimated forfeitures are based on historical experience.

Use of Estimates:Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaUS GAAP requires management to make estimates and certain assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of identified contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.expense. Actual results could differ from estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the application of the percentage-of-completion method of revenue recognition, the carrying amountamounts and estimated useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets, determination of share-based compensation expense, the valuation allowanceallowances for accounts receivable and inventories and certain assumptions used in impairment analyses.assessments. While management believes current estimates are reasonable and appropriate, actual results could differ from these estimates.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 40


Back to Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSReclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances in order to conform to the current year presentation.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information (in thousands):Application of New Accounting Standard

   Years Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities:

    

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired:

      

Fair value of net assets acquired

  $  $97,973  $58,233  

Less cash acquired

         (605

Less debt issued

         (1,544

Less equity issued

         (1,855

Less equity in earnings prior to acquisition and other

         (1,201
             

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

  $  $97,973  $53,028  
             

Property and equipment acquired through capital leases

  $211  $599  $206  
             

Shares issued in payment of accrued bonus

  $481  $  $  
             

Supplemental cash flow information:

      

Interest paid

  $9,063  $6,434  $2,852  

Income taxes paid

  $3,685  $8,244  $8,061  

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

InEffective January 1, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issuedCompany adopted the accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) Topic 820-10 to require new disclosures related to the movements in and out of Levels 1, 2, and 3 and clarifies existing disclosures regarding the classification and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about certain Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the additional requirements, but does not anticipate any financial impact as the requirements primarily provide for additional disclosure.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-15,“Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing”Financing which amendsamended or added certain paragraphs to the related ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) Topic 470,Debt.Debt.” This standard addresses the accounting for an entity’s own-share lending arrangement initiated in conjunction with convertible debt or another financing offering and the effect aof the share-lending arrangement has on earnings per share. Additionally, theThe guidance also addresses the accounting and earnings per share implications for probable or actual defaults by the share borrower, both when a default becomes probableborrower. The new guidance is required to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented.

The Company has adopted this guidance and applied it to the existing share lending arrangement (See Note 10). The retrospective effect of occurringthe adoption of ASU No. 2009-15 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and when a default actually occurs. This guidancethe consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is provided below (in thousands, except per share data):

Consolidated Balance Sheet

As of December 31, 2009

As Reported

Adjustment

As Adjusted

Other intangible assets, net

$

34,837

$

291

$

35,128

Total assets

178,610

291

178,901

Additional paid-in capital

$

83,555

$

465

$

84,020

Accumulated deficit

(63,168)

(174)

(63,342)

Total stockholders’ equity

26,905

291

27,196

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

178,610

291

178,901

Consolidated Statement of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2009

As Reported

Adjustment

As Adjusted

Interest expense

$

(15,431)

$

(93)

$

(15,524)

Net loss

(50,240)

(93)

(50,333)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

(52,471)

(93)

(52,564)

Basic and diluted loss per common share

$

(2.68)

$

-

$

(2.68)

Weighted average common shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per common share

19,595

19,595

Consolidated Statement of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2008

As Reported

Adjustment

As Adjusted

Interest expense

$

(13,813)

$

(81)

$

(13,894)

Net loss

(34,161)

(81)

(34,242)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

(34,161)

(81)

(34,242)

Basic and diluted loss per common share

$

(1.78)

$

(0.01)

$

(1.79)

Weighted average common shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per common share

19,157

19,157

New Accounting Requirements and Disclosures

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” amending ASC Topic 820-10 which requires disclosure related to movements in and out of fair value hierarchy Levels 1, 2 and 3 and clarifies existing disclosures regarding the classification and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for interim orand annual reporting periods beginning after JuneDecember 15, 2009, except for new share-lending arrangements. For existing share-lending arrangements, the guidance is applied retrospectivelycertain Level 3 fair value measurement disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the effect31, 2010. Adoption of thethis accounting principle, but does not expect that its adoption will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. The Company will make the required disclosures and present the retrospective effect following adoption of this guidance, effective January 1, 2010.

In August 2009,2010, resulted in no additional disclosures as the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,” which amends ASC Topic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall,” for theCompany experienced no movement in fair value measurement of liabilities. This update specifies valuation techniques allowed for measurement of the fair value of liabilities and

measurements between hierarchy levels.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 41


Back to Contents

NOTE 3  Supplemental Cash Flow Information

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Supplemental cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Fair value of assets acquired, net

$

-

$

-

$

97,973

Warrant liability recognized upon issuance of warrants

-

5,194

-

Fair value of share lending agreement treated as issuance cost

-

-

465

Value of common stock issued in payment of debt issuance costs

5,095

-

-

Value exchanged in conversion of preferred stock into common stock

4,795

-

-

Debt related commitment fees included in accrued liabilities

1,000

-

-

Value of common stock issued in exchange for convertible notes

1,992

-

-

Reduction in convertible debt upon note exchange

1,996

-

-

Property and equipment acquired through capital leases

615

211

599

Exercise of stock options by common stock surrender

111

-

-

Restricted shares issued in payment of accrued bonuses

-

481

-

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH PAYMENT INFORMATION:

Interest paid

$

10,901

$

9,063

$

6,434

Income taxes (refunded) paid, net

(6,186)

3,685

8,244

NOTE 4  Acquisitions

clarifies when the quoted price for an identical liability traded as an asset in an active market can be recognized as a Level 1 fair value measurement. This guidance is effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after its issuance. The Company adopted this guidance effective October 1, 2009. Adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-01, Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” which released the Accounting Standards Codification. The Codification serves as a single source of authoritative GAAP to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States, except for the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for registrants. Authoritative standards included in the Codification are designated by their ASC topical reference, with new standards designated as ASU’s, with a year and assigned sequence number. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after September 15, 2009. Adoption of this standard did not change GAAP and had no financial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to subsequent events found within ASC Topic 855,“Subsequent Events.” This guidance sets standards for the disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Additionally, the guidance sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted this guidance effective June 30, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments found within ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.” This guidance requires fair value disclosures in both interim as well as annual financial statements in order to provide more timely information about the effects of current market conditions on financial instruments. The Company adopted this guidance effective June 30, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 3—Acquisitions

On February 14, 2008, Teledrift Acquisition, Inc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired substantially all of the assets of Teledrift, Inc. (“Teledrift”), in an equity purchase acquisition, for thean aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $98.0 million, which includes a purchase price adjustment of $1.8 million recorded in the third quarter of 2008.million. The acquisition resulted in recognition of goodwill of $46.4 million and intangible assets other than goodwill of $31.6 million which were recorded inwithin the Company’s Drilling Products business segment. Teledrift designs and manufactures wireless survey and measurement while drilling (“MWD”) tools.

NOTE 5  Product Revenue

The Company differentiates revenue and cost of revenue depending upon whether the source of revenue is related to Products, Rentals or MWD, tools.Services (in thousands):

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Revenue:

Product

$

93,763

$

72,282

$

145,074

Rental

42,169

28,620

60,343

Service

11,050

11,648

20,646

$

146,982

$

112,550

$

226,063

Cost of revenue:

Product

$

54,924

$

48,728

$

88,384

Rental

22,390

17,769

28,093

Service

7,476

7,409

11,556

Depreciation

9,222

9,260

7,274

$

94,012

$

83,166

$

135,307

On January 4, 2007, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of Triumph Drilling Tools, Inc. (“Triumph”) for $31.1 million in cash. The acquisition resulted in goodwill of $19.9 million and intangible assets other than goodwill of $1.9 million, which were recorded in the Drilling Products business segment. Triumph is a leading regional provider of down-hole rental equipment to the oil and gas industry. Results of operations for Triumph are included in the Company’s consolidated condensed statements of income as of January 1, 2007.

In January 2007, the Company acquired a 50% partnership interest in CAVO Drilling Motors Ltd Co. (“CAVO”) for approximately $2.6 million in cash, 143,434 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $1.9 million and a $1.5 million promissory note to the seller. CAVO is a complete downhole motor solutions provider

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 42


Back to Contents

NOTE 6  Inventory

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Inventory is comprised of the following (in thousands):

December 31,

2010

2009

Raw materials

$

10,920

$

9,653

Work-in-process

25

-

Finished goods

19,533

20,659

Gross inventory

30,478

30,312

Less reserve for excess and obsolete inventory

(2,633)

(3,080)

INVENTORY, NET

$

27,845

$

27,232

specializingChanges in the rental, servicingreserve for excess and sale of high-performance mud motors for a variety of drilling applications. CAVO serves both the domestic and international drilling markets with a customer base extending throughout North America, South America, Russia and West Africa. For the first ten months of 2007 the Company reported the partnership interest in CAVO using the equity method of accounting as the Company did not own a controlling interest. The equity in earnings and other adjustments affecting the Company’s investment in CAVO during 2007 were approximately $1.2 million.

On November 15, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of the remaining 50% partnership interest in CAVO. The Company paid aggregate consideration of $12.5 million in cash and assumed $0.2 million in long-term debt. From November 1, 2007 through the end of the year CAVO was accounted for as a fully owned subsidiary.

On August 31, 2007, the Company acquired Sooner Energy Services, Inc. (“Sooner”) for $7.2 million in cash. Sooner develops, produces and distributes specialty chemical products and services for drilling and production of natural gas. Sooner serves natural gas producers, oilfield supply stores, drilling mud and other service companies in North America. Results of operations for Sooner are included in the Company’s consolidated condensed statement of income as of September 1, 2007.

Note 4—Product Revenue

The Company generates revenue through three main sales channels: Products, Rentals and Services. In most instances, revenue is generated through these channels on an integrated basis. Sales channel information is as follows (in thousands):

   Years Ended December 31,
   2009  2008  2007

Revenue:

      

Product

  $72,282  $145,074  $118,443

Rental

   28,620   60,343   24,349

Service

   11,648   20,646   15,216
            
   112,550   226,063   158,008
            

Cost of Revenue:

      

Product

   48,728   88,384   71,190

Rental

   17,769   28,093   11,086

Service

   7,409   11,556   8,021

Depreciation

   9,260   7,274   4,264
            
  $83,166  $135,307  $94,561
            

Note 5—Inventories

The components of inventoriesobsolete inventory are as follows (in thousands):

   December 31, 
   2009  2008 

Raw materials

  $9,653   $16,258  

Work-in-process

       1,890  

Finished goods (includes in-transit)

   20,659    22,286  
         

Gross inventories

   30,312    40,434  

Less: slow-moving and obsolescence reserve

   (3,080  (2,407
         

Inventories, net

  $27,232   $38,027  
         

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Beginning balance

$

3,080

$

2,407

$

2,394

Charged to costs and expense

771

6,340

3,567

Deductions

(1,218)

(5,667)

(3,554)

ENDING BALANCE

$

2,633

$

3,080

$

2,407

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTE 7

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and records provisions for slow-moving or obsolete inventory based primarily on forecasts of product demand, historical trends, market conditions, production or procurement requirements and technological developments.

The following summarizes the changes in inventory reserve for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):

      Additions      
   Beginning
Balance
  Charged to
Costs and
Expense
  Charged to
Other
Accounts (a)
  Deductions  Ending
Balance

Years Ended December 31,

               

2007

  $862  $1,261  $553  $(282 $2,394

2008

   2,394   3,567      (3,554  2,407

2009

   2,407   6,340      (5,667  3,080

(a)

Amounts represent amounts obtained from acquisitions.

Note 6—Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are as followsincludes (in thousands):

  December 31, 

December 31,

  2009 2008 

2010

2009

Land

  $1,338   $1,381  

$

1,266

$

1,338

Buildings and leasehold improvements

   19,143    16,354  

18,609

19,143

Machinery, equipment and rental tools

   62,369    55,866  

40,247

62,369

Equipment in progress

   133    5,472  

1,271

133

Furniture and fixtures

   1,306    1,172  

1,278

1,306

Transportation equipment

   4,252    4,927  

3,648

4,252

Computer equipment

   1,750    1,255  

1,895

1,750

       

Gross property and equipment

   90,291    86,427  

Less: accumulated depreciation

   (30,040  (19,592
       

Property and equipment, net

  $60,251   $66,835  
       

Property and equipment

68,214

90,291

Less accumulated depreciation

(25,690)

(30,040)

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

$

42,524

$

60,251

Depreciation expense, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007inclusive of expense captured in cost of revenue, was $11.3 million, $11.7 million $9.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Depreciation expense that directly relates to activities that generate revenue amounted to $9.3 million, $7.3 million and $4.3$9.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company’s testing determined potential impairment of certain rental fixed assets within the Drilling segment was required due to shifts in market demand. Drilling activity has become more concentrated in horizontal and 2007, respectively, and is recorded within cost of revenues.

Note 7—Goodwilldirectional drilling versus vertical drilling, which in recent years had been more dominant.

The estimated fair value of identified asset groups was calculated based on probability weighted future cash flows. Expected cash flows of each identified asset group took into consideration direct material cost margins and serviceable costs, historic and expected utilization, and remaining useful life. In addition, the Company tests goodwillused a present value WACC technique to analyze the recoverability of the identified asset groups. The Company recognized impairment charges of $8.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 and a net loss on disposal of assets of $2.2 million.

NOTE 8  Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis,annually in the fourth quarter of the calendar year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate aare indicative of potential impairment. Annual goodwill impairment evaluations are performed inOf the fourth quarter. The Company hasCompany’s four identified four reporting units of which(Chemicals and Logistics, Artificial Lift, Drilling Products, and Teledrift), only two, Chemicals and Logistics and Teledrift have an unamortizedhad goodwill balance at December 31, 2009.2010.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 43


Back to Contents

The Company’s 2010 annual goodwill impairment assessment resulted in no impairment of any reporting unit’s is goodwill. During 2009, periodic assessments of goodwill were performed due to continuing deterioration in global economies and oil and natural gas industry conditions; as well as the declining financial performance of all reporting units. An impairment charge of $18.5 million was recognized for the Teledrift reporting unit in June 2009. No additional impairment of goodwill was deemed necessary during subsequent interim or annual testing during the remainder of 2009. As a result of the Company’s 2008 annual testing forassessment of goodwill impairment, during the fourth quarter of 2008,Company recognized goodwill impairments totaling $61.5$61.4 million were identified withinaccross three of the four reporting units. The impairment charge was recorded as an operating expense during the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company again tested for

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

goodwill impairment during the second and third quarters of 2009 as a result of the continuing deterioration of the general economic and oil and gas industry conditions, and the declining financial performance of all of its reporting units. An impairment totaling $18.5 million was identified and recorded as an operating expense during the six months ended June 30, 2009. No further impairments of goodwill were recognized during the Company’s interim or annual testing for goodwill impairment during the third and fourth quarters of 2009.

In estimating the fair valuedetermination of the Company’sidentified reporting units, management makesmade estimates and judgments aboutregarding future cash flows and market valuationsvalues using a combination ofboth an income and market approaches, respectively, defined asvaluation approach, and Level 3 inputs as defined under the fair value measurement hierarchy. The income approach, specifically a discounted cash flow analysis, included assumptions for among others, discount rates, cash flow projections, growth rates and terminal value rates, all of which require significant judgment. Specific assumptionsrates. Each assumption discussed above are updatedis reevaluated at theeach testing date of each testin order to consider current industry andtake into consideration Company-specific risk factors from theand market participant’s perspective of a market participant.current industry trends.

The changes in the carrying amountvalue of goodwill for each reporting unit for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows (in thousands):

   Chemicals
and
Logistics
  Downhole
Tool
  Teledrift  Artificial
Lift
  Total 

Balance at January 1, 2007

  $7,620  $9,689   $   $6,876   $24,185  

Goodwill acquired:

       

Triumph

      19,872            19,872  

CAVO

      13,487            13,487  

Sooner

   3,990               3,990  

Purchase price adjustments and reclassifications to intangible assets

      (39      (1,015  (1,054
                     

Balance at December 31, 2007

   11,610   43,009        5,861    60,480  

Goodwill acquired: Teledrift

          46,396        46,396  

Impairment

      (43,009  (12,563  (5,861  (61,433
                     

Balance at December 31, 2008

   11,610       33,833        45,443  

Impairment

          (18,500      (18,500
                     

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $11,610  $   $15,333   $   $26,943  
                     

Chemicals and Logistics

Downhole Tool

Teledrift

Artificial Lift

Total

Balance at December 31, 2008:

Goodwill

$

11,610

$

43,009

$

46,396

$

5,861

$

106,876

Accumulated impairment losses

-

(43,009)

(12,563)

(5,861)

(61,433)

Goodwill balance, net

11,610

-

33,833

-

45,443

Activity during the year 2009:

Goodwill impairment recognized

-

-

(18,500)

-

(18,500)

Balance at December 31, 2009:

Goodwill

11,610

43,009

46,396

5,861

106,876

Accumulated impairment losses

-

(43,009)

(31,063)

(5,861)

(79,933)

Goodwill balance, net

11,610

-

15,333

-

26,943

Activity during the year 2010:

Goodwill impairment recognized

-

-

-

-

-

Balance at December 31, 2010:

Goodwill

11,610

43,009

46,396

5,861

106,876

Accumulated impairment losses

-

(43,009)

(31,063)

(5,861)

(79,933)

GOODWILL BALANCE, NET

$

11,610

$

-

$

15,333

$

-

$

26,943

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTE 9

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 8—Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008

2010

2009

Other intangible assets:

  Carrying
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Carrying
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization

Carrying

Value

Accumulated

Amortization

Carrying

Value

Accumulated

Amortization

  $6,282  $2,618  $6,280  $2,302

$

6,330

$

2,932

$

6,282

$

2,618

   28,543   7,843   28,543   6,493

28,544

9,193

28,543

7,843

Non-compete agreements

   1,715   1,500   1,715   1,420

1,715

1,581

1,715

1,500

Brand name

   6,199   638   6,199   330

Brand names

6,199

945

6,199

638

Supply contract

   1,700   921   1,700   606

-

-

1,700

921

Other

   428   405   501   308

396

396

428

405

            

Other acquired intangible assets total

   44,867   13,925   44,938   11,459
            

Total intangible assets acquired

43,184

15,047

44,867

13,925

Deferred financing costs

   6,468   2,573   5,650   1,114

12,827

5,498

6,933

2,747

            

Total other intangible assets

  $51,335  $16,498  $50,588  $12,573

$

56,011

$

20,545

$

51,800

$

16,672

            

Other intangible assets, net

  $34,837    $38,015  

$

35,466

$

35,128

          

Other intangible assets acquired are being amortized on a straight-line basis ranging from two to 20 years. The Company recorded other intangibleIntangible asset amortization expense of $2.5 million, $2.5 million and $3.4 million was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The following table summarizes estimated aggregateAmortization of deferred financing costs of $4.0 million, $1.5 million and $1.1 million was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 44


Back to Contents

Estimated future amortization expense for other intangible assets existing at December 31, 2010 for eachthe next five calendar years totals (in thousands):

Year ending December 31,

2011

$

6,098

2012

5,057

2013

2,144

2014

1,941

2015

1,941

During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company became aware of a noncompliance with an exclusivity and preferential pricing arrangement previously recorded as an intangible asset with remaining unamortized residual value of $0.4 million. Consequently, the Company realized an impairment loss of $0.4 million.

During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company tested other intangible assets for impairment as a result of continuing deterioration of the five succeeding fiscal years (in thousands):

Year ending December 31,

   

2010

  $4,082

2011

   3,765

2012

   2,861

2013

   2,050

2014

   1,955

In December 2008, testing ofglobal economic and oil and natural gas industry conditions; as well as the Company’s intangible assets due to the deteriorating macro-economic environment and business conditions affecting the oil and gas industry indicated impairment of several intangible assets.declining financial performance. As a result the Company recordedof this testing an impairment chargeloss of $6.2$6.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily related to customer lists and patents was recognized in the Artificial Lift and Drilling Products segments. Due to the continuing deterioration of the general economic and oil and gas industry conditions, and the declining financial performance of all of its reporting units, the Company tested for potential impairment of its intangible assets in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2009. The Company utilized an income approach (Level 3) consistent with that described in Note 7, Goodwill. No2008. During 2009 no impairment was recorded asrecognized related to other intangible assets. Other intangible asset fair values were estimated utilizing a resultpresent values of these tests during the year ended December 31, 2009.estimated future cash flows technique.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTE 10

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 9—Convertible Senior Notes and Long-Term Debt

Convertible Senior Notesnotes and long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

2010

2009

Convertible notes:

Convertible senior unsecured notes (2008 Notes)

$

75,000

$

115,000

Convertible senior secured notes (2010 Notes)

36,004

-

Less discount on notes

(12,449)

(19,399)

CONVERTIBLE NOTES, NET OF DISCOUNT

$

98,555

$

95,601

Long-term debt:

Term loan

$

33,621

$

-

Senior credit facility:

Equipment term loans

-

21,210

Revolving line of credit

-

9,953

Real estate term loans

-

717

Capital lease obligations

960

658

Total long term debt

34,581

32,538

Less current portion of long-term debt

(6,454)

(8,949)

LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT PORTION

$

28,127

$

23,589

Convertible Notes

   December 31, 
   2009  2008 

Convertible Senior Notes

  $115,000   $115,000  

Less discount on notes

   (19,399  (24,197
         

Convertible Senior Notes, net of discount

  $95,601   $90,803  
         

Long-term debt:

   

Senior Credit Facility

   

Equipment term loans

  $21,210   $34,000  

Revolving line of credit

   9,953    2,311  

Real estate term loans

   717    787  

Other

       515  

Capital lease obligations

   658    882  
         

Total

   32,538    38,495  

Less current portion

   (8,949  (9,017
         

Long-term debt, less current portion

  $23,589   $29,478  
         

The Company’s convertible notes consist of Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes

 (the “2008 Notes”) and Convertible Senior Secured Notes (the “2010 Notes”). On February 14, 2008, the Company issued 5.25% Convertible Seniorthe 2008 Notes due 2028 (the “Notes”), at par, in thefor an aggregate principal amount of $115 million. Net proceeds received from issuance of the 2008 Notes weretotaled $111.8 million. The 2008 Notes bear interest at 5.25% and mature on February 15, 2028. The 2008 Notes may be settled in cash upon conversion. The Company usedhas accounted for both the liability and equity components of the 2008 Notes using the Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The Company assumed an 11.5% nonconvertible debt interest rate and a five year expected amortization term of the associated debt discount. The five year term represents the time period from inception until contractual call/put options, contained within the 2008 Notes, are exercisable (February 2013). An effective tax rate of 38.0% was assumed. At the date of issuance, the discount on the 2008 Notes was $27.8 million, with an associated deferred tax liability of $10.6 million. The remaining discount is being accreted over a five year term as additional non-cash interest expense.

On March 31, 2010, the Company executed an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Whitebox Advisors, LLC, the administrative agent of a syndicate of lenders, in order to refinance the Company’s then existing term loan (described below). The Exchange Agreement permitted each lender to exchange 2008 Notes, in proportion to the lender’s principal amount of participation in the refinanced term loan, for 2010 Notes and shares of the Company’s common stock. At March 31, 2010, the unamortized discount related to the pro-rata portion of the 2008 Notes exchanged was allocated to the 2010 Notes and continues to be accreted over the same period, at an assumed rate of 9.9%, using the effective interest method. Non-cash interest expense related to accretion of the debt discount of $4.9 million, $4.8 million and $3.6 million was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 45


Back to Contents

In accordance with the terms of the Exchange Agreement, on March 31, 2010, investors received, for each $1,000 principal amount of 2008 Notes exchanged, (a) $900 principal amount of 2010 Notes and (b) $50 in shares of the Company’s common stock (based on the greater of 95% of (1) the volume-weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding ten trading days or (2) the closing price of the common stock on the day before the closing). The 2010 Notes carry the same maturity date, interest rate, conversion rights, conversion rate, redemption rights and guarantees as the 2008 Notes. The only difference in terms is the 2010 Notes are secured by a second priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets, while the 2008 Notes remain unsecured.

The Company exchanged $40 million of 2008 Notes for aggregate consideration of $36 million of 2010 Notes and $2.0 million worth of shares of the Company’s common stock. On March 31, 2010, the Company issued 1,568,867 shares of common stock to satisfy the common stock component of the Exchange Agreement. The transaction was accounted for as an exchange of debt. Appropriately, no gain or loss was recognized and the difference between the debt exchanged and the net proceeds from issuancecarrying value of the Notesdebt was recorded as a reduction of previously recognized debt discount. The remaining debt discount continues to financebe amortized over the acquisitionremaining period the convertible debt is expected to remain outstanding. The Company capitalized commitment fees ($7.3 million) related to the Exchange Agreement that are being amortized using the effective interest method over the period the convertible debt is expected to remain outstanding. Third-party transaction costs of Teledrift (see Note 3) and for general corporate purposes.

Because the Company is$0.8 million incurred as a holding company with no independent assets or operations, the Notes are guaranteed by the Company and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The guarantees are full and unconditional, and joint and several, on a senior, unsecured basis. The agreements governing the Company’s long-term indebtedness do not contain any significant restrictions on the abilityresult of the Company or any guarantor to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.Exchange Agreement were expensed as incurred.

Interest on the 2008 and 2010 Notes accruesis accrued at 5.25% per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year.15. The Company is also required to pay contingent interest to holders of the 2008 and 2010 Notes during any six-month period from an interest payment date to, but excluding, the following interest payment date, commencing with the six-month period beginning on February 15, 2013, if the trading price of a Notenote for each of the five trading days ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the first day of the relevant six-month period equals 120% or more of the principal amount of the Note. The amount of contingentContingent interest payable per Notenote, with respect to any such period, will be equal to 0.50%0.5% per annum of the average trading price of such Note for the five trading days referred toreferenced above.

The 2008 and 2010 Notes mature on February 15, 2028. On or after February 15, 2013, the Company may redeem, for cash, all or a portion of the 2008 and 2010 Notes at a redemption price ofequal to 100% of the principal note amount of the Notes to be redeemed plus associated accrued and unpaid interest, (includingincluding any contingent interest) to, but not including, the redemption date.interest. Holders mayof either 2008 or 2010 Notes can require the Company to purchase all, or a portion, of their Notesthe holder’s outstanding notes on each of February 15, 2013, February 15, 2018, and February 15, 2023. In addition, if

If the Company experiences specificengages in contractually specified types of corporate transactions, holders maynoteholders can require the Company to purchase all or a portion of theirthe holder’s outstanding Notes. Any repurchase of the 2008 and 2010 Notes pursuant to theseaforementioned provisions willare to be for a cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be purchased plus associated accrued and unpaid interest, (includingincluding any contingent interest) to, but not including, the purchase date.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

interest.

The 2008 and 2010 Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the note holder, subject to specifiedcontractual conditions. The conversion rate is 43.9560 shares per $1,000 principal note amount of Notes (equal to a conversion price of approximately $22.75 per share), subject to adjustment.adjustment, as contractually defined. Upon conversion, the Company will deliver, at itsthe Company’s option, eithercash or shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock.

Because the Notes may be settled in cash upon conversion, the Company has accounted for the liability and equity components of the Notes in a manner that reflects the Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The Company assumed an 11.5% nonconvertible debt interest rate and an expected term of the debt of five years to determine the debt discount. The expected term of five years is based upon the time until a call/put option can be exercised on the Notes in February 2013. The effective tax rate assumed was 38.0%. At the date of issuance, the discount on the Notes was $27.8 million, with a related deferred tax liability of $10.6 million. The resulting discount on the Notes is being accreted over the period the convertible debt is expected to be outstanding as additional noncash interest expense. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, noncash interest expense related to accretion of the discount was $4.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively.Term Loan

On March 31, 2010, the Company executed an exchange agreementAmended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Senior Credit Facility” or “term loan”) with Whitebox Advisors, LLC, and a syndicate of lenders under the Company’s new senior secured credit facility. This will permit the exchange of up to $40 million of the Company’s Notes for the aggregate consideration of $36 million in new convertible senior secured notes and $2 million in shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 19).

Senior Credit Facility

On March 31, 2008, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), as administrative agent for a syndicate of lenders, for a $65$40 million term loan. The term loan was used to repay the Company’s then existing senior credit facility (the “Seniorand provided net proceeds of $6.1 million to be used for general corporate operating purposes.

Term loan indebtedness matures November 1, 2012 and, as of December 31, 2010, has scheduled cash principal payments of $3,750,000 in 2011 and $3,000,000, plus as any remaining unpaid principal balance, in 2012. Interest is payable quarterly. The Company has the option to fully pay the interest due in cash or to pay a portion of the interest due in cash and capitalize the remaining unpaid interest due. Any capitalization of interest results in an increase in the principal amount due under the term loan. The annualized cash interest rate is 12.5% when the principal balance exceeds $30 million, 11.5% when the principal balance is $20 million or more but not in excess of $30 million, and 10.5% when the principal balance is less than $20 million. If the Company elects to capitalize a portion of the interest, the annualized cash interest rate is 8% and additional interest is capitalized and added to the principal amount of the Senior Credit Facility”). The facility includesFacility at a term loan facilityannualized rate of $406% when the principal balance exceeds $30 million, (the “Term Loan Facility”)4.5% when the principal balance is $20 million or more but not in excess of $30 million, and a revolving credit facility with a maximum availability of $25 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). Initial borrowing under this Credit Agreement refinanced substantially all borrowing under a similar credit agreement with Wells Fargo.3.5% when the principal balance is less than $20 million.

The Term LoanSenior Credit Facility is limitedrequires additional mandatory principal payments of (a) 50% of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other non-cash items) in excess of $4.5 million in any fiscal quarter, (b) 50% of cash proceeds in excess of $5 million and up to $15 million from certain identified asset disposals, plus 75% of cash proceeds in excess of $15 million from certain identified asset disposals, (c) 75% of any Federal income tax refunds, and (d) upon election by the initial advance, and amounts repaid may not be re-borrowed. The maximum amountlenders, up to $1 million of credit available underadditional principal repayment on quarterly payment dates, when the Revolving Credit Facilityvolume-weighted average price of the Company’s stock price is equal to or greater than $1.3419 per share, payable by common stock issuance (based on 95% of the lesservolume-weighted average price of $25the common stock for the preceding ten trading days).

The Senior Credit Facility provided for a commitment fee of $7.3 million. As of December 31, 2010, $6.3 million of the commitment fee has been settled through payments of $1.2 million in cash and issuance of 4,042,248 shares of common stock. The remaining commitment fee at December 31, 2010, of $1,000,000 is payable at March 31, 2011, in cash, common stock or a combination of both cash or common stock (calculated on $1.1406 per share). At December 31, 2010, the amount determined through a borrowing base calculation using eligible accounts receivableunpaid commitment fee of $1.0 million is recorded in accrued liabilities. The election as to whether the remaining commitment fee will be paid in cash, common stock or combination of both cash and eligible inventory,common stock is decided by the Company if the volume-weighted average price of the common stock is $1.00 or more per share and by the lenders if such average is less than $1.00 per share at the payment date. One half of the commitment fee has been allocated to the term loan and one half of the commitment fee has been allocated to the Exchange Agreement (see above). Commitment fees capitalized as specified indeferred financing costs are amortized as additional interest expense over the Credit Agreement.remaining periods the term loan and the convertible debt are expected to remain outstanding.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 46


Back to Contents

Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company and its domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all present and future assets of the CompanyCompany. The Senior Credit Facility does not contain a revolving line of credit facility nor require quarterly or annual financial covenants; however, the credit agreement does restrict the payment of dividends on the Company’s common stock without the prior written consent of the lenders, as well as, limit the amount of capital investment allowed the Company.

Convertible Notes and its subsidiaries. Outstanding balances under the Term Loan FacilityGuarantees

The 2008 Notes and 2010 Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility mature andterm loan are due on March 31, 2011.

Principal payments of $2 million are due quarterly under the Term Loan Facility. In addition, mandatory prepayments are required annually beginning April 15, 2009, equal to 50%guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s excess cash flow forwholly-owned subsidiaries. Flotek Industries, Inc., the previous calendar year.parent company, is a holding company and has no independent assets or operations. The Company is further required to make certain mandatory prepayments underguarantees provided by the Term Loan Facility upon the receipt of proceeds from any debt or equity issuancesCompany’s subsidiaries are full and upon certain asset sales. In addition, if the outstanding balance under the Term Loan Facility exceeds 75%unconditional, and joint and several. Any subsidiaries of the appraised orderly liquidation valueCompany that are not guarantors are deemed to be “minor” subsidiaries in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.” The agreements governing the Company’s long-term indebtedness do not contain any significant restrictions on the ability of the Company’s fixed assets atCompany, or any time, the Company must reduce the Term Loan Facilityguarantor, to obtain funds from subsidiaries by such excess amount.dividend or loan.

Interest accrues on amounts outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility at variable rates based on, at the Company’s election, the prime rate or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin specified in the Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2009, the Company had elected to apply the prime rate, plus the applicable margin, to certain portions of the outstanding balance and to apply LIBOR, plus the applicable margin, to other portions of the

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

outstanding balance. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was 8.46% and 5.14%, respectively. In accordance with terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to enter into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate on a minimum of 50% of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility (see Note 10).

Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are subject to certain covenants and a material adverse change subjective acceleration clause. Affirmative covenants include compliance with laws, various reporting requirements, visitation rights, maintenance of insurance, maintenance of properties, keeping of records and books of account, preservation of assets, notification of adverse events, ERISA compliance, agreements with new subsidiaries, borrowing base audits and use of treasury management services. Negative covenants include limitations associated with liens, indebtedness, change in nature of business, transactions with affiliates, investments, dividends and distributions, subordinate debt, leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, consolidated net income, asset sales and capital expenditures.

The Credit Agreement contains certain financial and other covenants, including a minimum net worth covenant, a maximum leverage ratio covenant, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, a maximum senior leverage ratio covenant, a covenant restricting capital expenditures, a covenant limiting the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and a covenant restricting acquisitions.

During 2009, the Company amended the Credit Agreement on four occasions, to provide, among other things, a decrease in the aggregate revolving commitment, an increase in the interest margin applicable to borrowings, and changes in financial covenants related to minimum net worth, the leverage ratio, the fixed charge coverage ratio, and maximum annual capital expenditures. At December 31, 2009, certain specific financial requirements and ratios are as follows:

Aggregate revolving credit limit

$15 million, but limited to $14.5 million (subject to change)

Interest rate margin

6.5% (above the prime rate or LIBOR)

Minimum net worth, as defined

$42.8 million

Leverage ratio, beginning June 30, 2010

4.75 to 1.0, declining quarterly to 3.75 to 1.0 at December 31, 2010

Fixed charge coverage ratio

1.10 to 1.0, increasing to 1.25 to 1.0 at September 30, 2010

Senior leverage ratio

Maximum of 2.0 to 1.0

Maximum annual capital expenditures

$11 million for 2010

At December 31, 2009, the Company was not in compliance with the minimum net worth, fixed charge coverage ratio, and senior leverage ratio covenants of the Credit Agreement.

On March 31, 2010, the Company executed an amended and restated credit agreement with Whitebox Advisors, LLC for a $40 million term loan. Pursuant to this new agreement the Company’s existing Senior Credit Facility was renewed and extended, and the Company received cash proceeds of $6.1 million (see Note 19).

Other

In conjunction with the acquisition of a 50% interest in CAVO in January 2007, the Company issued a $1.5 million note payable to the seller. The note bore interest at 6% and was paid in full in December 2009.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Capital Lease Obligations

The Company leases certain equipment and vehicles under capital leases. At December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $0.7 million in capitalized lease obligations.

Maturities of long-term debt obligations at December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

   Long-Term
Debt
  Capital
Leases
  Total Long-
Term Debt
and Capital
Leases
  Convertible
Senior Notes

Year Ending December 31,

            

2010

  $8,717  $232  $8,949  $

2011

   23,163   205   23,368   

2012

      154   154   

2013

      64   64   115,000

2014

      3   3   

Thereafter

            
                

Total

  $31,880  $658  $32,538  $115,000
                

Note 10—Interest Rate Swap

As required by itsThe Company’s senior credit facility at Wells Fargo Bank required the Company has enteredto enter into an interest rate swap agreement on a minimum of 50% of the term loan facility (see Note 9)in order to reduce itsmitigate exposure to interest rate risk. At December 31, 2009,In March 2010, the Company repaid the Wells Fargo senior credit facility and terminated the interest rate swap. The fair value of the interest rate swap had a notional amount of $21.0 million, swap rate of 2.79% and a fair value of $334,000. The Company records the fair value of the swapwas recorded in accrued liabilities and the change in the unrealized gain (loss) in other income (expense).or loss was recorded as interest expense. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized a loss of $0.1 million, a gain of $199,000$0.2 million, and a loss of $533,000,$0.5 million, respectively, on the interest rate swap. In March 2010,

Share Lending Agreement

Concurrent with the Company terminated the interest rate swap.

Note 11—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2009 and 2008 for liabilities included in the consolidated balances sheets at fair value and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2009 Using 
   Quoted Prices
in Active

Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
  Total 

Interest rate swap(1)

  $              $(334 $              $(334
   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2008 Using 
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total 

Interest rate swap(1)

  $              $(533 $              $(533

(1)

See Note 10 for discussion of the interest rates swap. The swap valuation is obtained from a bank estimate using pricing models with market-based inputs.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The estimated fair value and carrying valueoffering of the Company’s other financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

   December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008
   Carrying Value  Fair Value  Carrying Value  Fair Value

Convertible Senior Notes(1)

  $95,601  $60,375  $90,803  $28,750

Senior Credit Facility

   31,880   31,880   37,098   37,098

Capital lease obligations

   658   628   882   845

Other

         515   515

(1)

The Convertible Senior Note carrying value represents the bifurcated debt component only, while the fair value is based on quoted market prices for the convertible note, which includes the convertible equity features.

In 2009, the Company determined the estimated fair value amount of the Convertible Senior2008 Notes, based on quoted market price of the notes. In 2008, the Company determined the estimated fair value amount of the Convertible Senior Notes by using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. The fair value of the Senior Credit Facility approximates fair value because interest rates are variable, and accordingly, the carrying value approximates current market value for instruments with similar risks and maturities. Fair value of the capital leases was determined based on recent lease rates adjusted for a risk premium. At December 31, 2008, the fair value of the other note approximated carrying value due its short-term maturity. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the fair value of all other receivables and liabilities approximated their carrying values due to the short-tem nature of these instruments. The Company had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

The Company’s non-financial assets, including goodwill, other intangible assets and property and equipment are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment). Fair value measurements and adjustments to goodwill and other intangible assets are discussed in Note 7 and Note 8, respectively.

Note 12—Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding, if the effect is dilutive. Because of the net loss during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share, since including them would have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share.

In connection with the sale of the 5.25% convertible senior notes in February 2008, the Company entered into a share lending agreement for 3,800,000(the “Share Lending Agreement”) with Bear, Stearns International Limited (the “Borrower”). The Borrower became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of JP Morgan Chase & Company. In accordance with the Share Lending Agreement, the Company loaned 3.8 million shares of its common stock (see Note 15). (the “Borrowed Shares”) to the Borrower for a period commencing February 11, 2008 and ending on February 15, 2028. The Company may terminate the Share Lending Agreement earlier, upon written notice to the Borrower, if the principal balance of the 2008 Notes has been repaid or upon agreement with the Borrower. The Borrower is permitted to use the Borrowed Shares only for the purpose of directly or indirectly facilitating the sale of the 2008 Notes and for the establishment of hedge positions by holders of the 2008 Notes. The Company did not require collateral to mitigate any inherent or associated risk of the Share Lending Agreement.

In February 2008, the Borrower borrowed all 3.8 million shares available under the Share Lending Agreement. The shares are subject to adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits or reverse stock splits. The Company did not receive any proceeds for the Borrowed Shares but did receive a nominal loan fee of $0.0001 for each share loaned. The Borrower retains all proceeds from the sale of Borrowed Shares pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement. Upon conversion, the number of Borrowed Shares proportionate to the conversion rate for such notes must be returned to the Company. Any borrowed shares returned to the Company cannot be re-borrowed.

The Borrowed Shares are issued and outstanding for corporate law purposes; accordingly, holders of Borrowed Shares possess all of the rights of a holder of the Company’s outstanding shares, including the right to vote the shares on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, as well as the right to receive any dividends or other distributions declared or paid on outstanding shares of common stock. Under the Share Lending Agreement, the Borrower has agreed to pay to the Company, within one business day after a payment date, an amount equal to any cash dividends that the Company paid on the Borrowed Shares, and to pay or deliver to the Company, upon termination of the loan of Borrowed Shares, any other distribution, in liquidation or otherwise, that the Company made on the Borrowed Shares.

To the extent the Borrowed Shares loaned under the Share Lending Agreement are not sold or returned to the Company, the Borrower has agreed to not vote any borrowed shares of which the Borrower is the owner of record. The Borrower has also agreed, under the Share Lending Agreement, to not transfer or dispose of any borrowed shares, other than to Borrower’s affiliates, unless such transfer or disposition is pursuant to a registration statement that is effective under the Securities Act. Investors that purchase shares from the Borrower, and all subsequent transferees of such purchasers, will be entitled to the same voting rights, with respect to owned shares, as any other holder of common stock.

Contractual undertakings of the borrowerBorrower have the effect of substantially eliminating the economic dilution that otherwise would result from the issuance of the borrowed shares, andBorrowed Shares. Further, all shares outstanding under the share lending agreementShare Lending Agreement are required to be returned to the Company inat a future date. Consequently, the future. As a result, the 3,800,000 shares of the Company’s stock lentloaned under the share lending agreementShare Lending Agreement are not considered to be outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earnings per share.

The Company determined that the fair value of the share lending arrangement was $0.5 million at the date of issuance. The fair value has been recognized as a debt issuance cost and is being amortized, with the amortization included in interest expense, over a period from the date of issuance through the earliest put date of the related debt, February 15, 2013 (see Note 2). As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, unamortized debt issuance costs relating to the share lending arrangement were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The Company estimates that this unamortized value approximates the fair value of the loaned shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The fair value of similar common shares not subject to the share lending arrangement, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2010, was $20.7 million.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESForm 10-K – 47


Back to Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Capital Lease Obligations

The computational componentsCompany leases equipment and vehicles under capital leases. At December 31, 2010, the Company had $1.0 million of basiccapital lease obligations.

Maturities of convertible notes and diluted earnings (loss) per common sharelong-term debt at December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31,

Convertible

Senior Notes

Term Loan

Capital Leases

Total Convertible Notes and Long-Term Debt

2011

$

-

$

3,750

$

403

$

4,153

2012

-

29,871

361

30,232

2013

111,004

-

196

111,200

TOTAL

$

111,004

$

33,621

$

960

$

145,585

NOTE 11  Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company categorizes financial assets and liabilities into the three tiered levels of the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value and bases the categorization within the hierarchy on the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement.

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity or that are based upon the reporting entity’s assumptions about the inputs.

Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Company’s liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including identification of the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine these fair values, are as follows (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

At December 31, 2010:

Common stock warrants (1)

$

-

$

-

$

26,193

$

26,193

At December 31, 2009:

Common stock warrants (1)

$

-

$

-

$

4,729

$

4,729

Interest rate swap (2)

$

-

$

334

$

-

$

334

(1) The fair value of common stock warrants was estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. See Note 14 for additional information regarding warrants.

(2) The interest rate swap valuation was obtained from bank estimates utilizing pricing models with market-based inputs. See Note 10 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap.

There were no significant transfers in or out of either Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Changes in Level 3 liabilities are as follow (in thousands):

Warrant Liability

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

Balance, beginning of year

$

4,729

$

-

Fair value of warrants upon issuance

-

5,194

Fair value adjustments, net

21,464

(465)

Net transfers in/(out)

-

-

BALANCE, END OF YEAR

$

26,193

$

4,729

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 48


Back to Contents

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company’s non-financial assets, including property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustment in certain circumstances. See Notes 7, 8 and 9 for discussion of non-financial assets and assessment of impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an impairment of $8.9 million relating to property and equipment held and used and $0.4 million relating to other intangible assets. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded $18.5 million of goodwill impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded $61.4 million and $6.3 million of goodwill and other intangible assets impairment, respectively. Loss on impairment is reported in operating expenses. The fair value of impaired assets was measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these accounts. The Company had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2010 or 2009.

The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s Convertible Notes and Long-Term Debt are as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

Carrying Value

Fair Value

Carrying Value

Fair Value

Convertible senior unsecured notes (2008 Notes) (1)

$

65,858

$

64,688

$

95,601

$

60,375

Convertible senior secured notes (2010 Notes) (1)

32,697

32,684

-

-

Term loan

33,621

33,875

-

-

Senior credit facility

-

-

31,880

31,880

Capital lease obligations

960

942

658

628

(1) The carrying value of the convertible senior secured notes and unsecured notes is representative of the bifurcated debt component only, while the fair value is based on the market value of the notes, which incorporates the convertible equity component.

The Company determined the estimated fair value of the 2008 Notes based on the quoted market price of the notes. The estimated fair values of the 2010 Notes and term loan were determined based on rates available for instruments with similar risks and maturities. The carrying value of the Wells Fargo senior credit facility approximated fair value as interest rates were variable; accordingly, the carrying value approximated the current market value for instruments with similar risks and maturities. The fair value of capital lease obligations was determined based on recent lease rates adjusted for a risk premium. The estimated fair value of the convertible notes and long-term debt were measured using Level 2 inputs.

NOTE 12  Loss Per Share

Basic loss per common share is calculated by division of the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per common share is calculated by division of the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding, if dilutive. As net losses were realized during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share.

In connection with the sale of the 2008 Notes in February 2008, the Company entered into a Share Lending Agreement for 3,800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 10). Contractual undertakings of the Borrower have the effect of substantially eliminating the economic dilution that otherwise would result from the issuance of the Borrowed Shares, and all shares outstanding under the Share Lending Agreement are contractually obligated to be returned to the Company. As a result, shares lent under the Share Lending Agreement are not considered to be outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earnings or loss per share.

 

   Years Ended December 31,
   2009  2008  2007

Weighted average common shares used in computing basic earnings (loss) per common share

  19,595  19,157  18,338

Incremental common shares from stock options and warrants

      620
         

Weighted average common shares used in computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  19,595  19,157  18,958
         

Securities convertible into shares of common stock that were not used becauseconsidered in calculating the effectloss per common share, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive for 2010, 2009 and 2008, are as follows (in thousands):

2010

2009

2008

Stock options under long-term incentive plans

1,605

1,605

857

Stock warrants related to sales of preferred stock

5,853

10,480

-

Convertible senior notes (if-converted)

4,879

5,055

5,055

Convertible preferred stock (if-converted)

4,872

6,957

-

TOTAL ANTI-DILUTIVE SHARES

17,209

24,097

5,912

   2009  2008

Stock options under long-term incentive plans

  1,605  857

Stock warrants

  10,480  

Convertible senior notes (if-converted)

  5,055  5,055

Convertible preferred stock (if-converted)

  6,957  
      
  24,097  5,912
      

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 49


Back to Contents

Note 13—NOTE 13Income Taxes

Significant components of the income tax provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):

   Years Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Current:

    

Federal

  $(9,196 $8,681   $9,718  

State

   273    1,254    1,525  

Foreign

   439    447    272  
             

Total current

   (8,484  10,382    11,515  
             

Deferred:

    

Federal

   10,474    (20,287  (1,091

State

   26    (594  (10
             

Total deferred

   10,500    (20,881  (1,101
             

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  $2,016   $(10,499 $10,414  
             

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Current:

Federal

$

(2,729)

$

(9,196)

$

8,681

State

137

273

1,254

Foreign

658

439

447

Total current

(1,934)

(8,484)

10,382

Deferred:

Federal

(3,499)

10,474

(20,287)

State

(112)

26

(594)

Total deferred

(3,611)

10,500

(20,881)

PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES

$

(5,545)

$

2,016

$

(10,499)

A reconciliation of the actualeffective tax rate to the US federal statutory U.S. tax rate is as follows (in thousands):follows:

Year ended December 31,

  Years Ended December 31, 

2010

2009

2008

    2009     2008     2007   

Federal statutory rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

Federal statutory tax rate

35.0

%

35.0

%

35.0

%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

  0.9   (0.8 3.2  

0.1

0.9

(0.8)

Change in valuation allowance

  (38.6      

(8.40)

(38.6)

-

Goodwill impairment

     (11.6   

-

-

(11.6)

Warrant liability fair value adjustment

(15.3)

(0.1)

-

Other

  (1.4 0.9   0.2  

(0.1)

(1.4)

0.9

          

Effective income tax rate

  (4.1)% 23.5% 38.4%
          

EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE

11.3

%

(4.2)

%

23.5

%

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effectseffect of temporary differences between the carrying amountsvalue of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amountsvalue reported for income tax purposes, at the enacted tax rates in effect when the differences reverse. The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

  December 31, 

December 31,

  2009 2008 

2010

2009

Deferred tax assets:

   

Net operating loss carryforwards

  $11,994   $6,783  

$

14,238

$

11,994

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   213    533  

37

213

Inventory

   578    707  

Inventory valuation reserves

565

578

Equity compensation

   881    170  

414

881

Goodwill and other intangible assets

   19,820    15,055  

Intangible assets

18,266

19,820

Tax credit carryforwards

869

270

Other

   404    331  

7

134

       

Total gross deferred tax assets

   33,890    23,579  

Total deferred tax assets

34,396

33,890

Valuation allowance

   (18,784    

(22,940)

(18,784)

       

Total deferred tax assets, net

   15,106    23,579  
       

TOTAL DEFERRED TAX ASSETS, NET

11,456

15,106

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Property and equipment

   (7,420  (6,696

Property, plant and equipment

(2,422)

(7,420)

Convertible debt, net of discount

   (10,021  (9,195

(9,480)

(10,021)

Prepaid insurance and other

   (106  (131

(132)

(106)

       

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

   (17,547  (16,022
       

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

  $(2,441 $7,557  
       

Total deferred tax liabilities

(12,034)

(17,547)

NET DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES

$

(578)

$

(2,441)

As of December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had estimated U.S.US net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $32.5$38.7 million, expiring in various amounts induring 2021 through 2029. The ability to utilize net operating lossesNOLs and other tax attributes could be subject to a significant limitation if the Company were to undergo an “ownership change” for purposes of Section 382 of the tax code.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 50


Back to Contents

The Company’s current corporate organizational structure requires it to filethe filing of two separate consolidated U.S.US Federal income tax returns. As a result, taxable income of one group cannot be offset by tax attributes, including net operating losses,NOLs, of the other group. As of December 31, 2009,2010, one of the groups has a net operating loss carryforward and othergroup had net deferred tax assets of approximately $18.8$22.9 million. The Company has considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance was needed.is necessary. Based on this analysis,upon the Company has recordedCompany’s assessment a valuation allowance of $18.8$22.9 million was recorded in 2010 as management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The other group incurred a net operating lossNOL of approximately $22.4$8.9 million during the year ended December 31, 20092010 which will be carried back to prior years for an anticipated refund.refund of $2.9 million. The anticipated tax refund has been recorded as an income tax receivable at December 31, 2009.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2010.

The Company has not provided for withholding and U.S.calculated US taxes foron unremitted earnings of certain non-US subsidiaries due to the Company’s intent to reinvest the unremitted earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries because it intends to permanently reinvest a portion of the unremitted earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in their foreign operations.non-US subsidiaries. At December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had approximately $2.7 million in unremitted earnings outside the United States forUS which withholding and U.S. taxes were not provided. Incomeincluded for US tax expensepurposes. US income tax liability would be incurred if these funds were remitted to the United States.US. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of the deferred tax liability on such unremitted earnings.

The Company has performed an evaluation and concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements. The evaluation was performed for the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2009,2010, which areinclude the years ended December 31, 20042007 through December 31, 2009.2010 for US federal taxes and years ended December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2010 for state tax jurisdictions. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties and the related expense were not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Note 14—NOTE 14Convertible Preferred Stock and Stock Warrants

On August 12, 2009, the Company sold 16,000 units (the “Units”), consisting of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock and warrants, for $1,000 per Unit, yielding aggregate gross proceeds of $16.0 million. Net proceeds from issuance of the Units were $14.8 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of Units to reduce borrowings under the Company’s bankWells Fargo credit facility, thereby providing additionalensure availability of credit, and for general corporate purposes.

Each Unit wasis comprised of one share of cumulative convertible preferred stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”), warrants to purchase up to 155 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.31 per share (“Exercisable Warrants”) and contingent warrants to purchase up to 500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.45 per share (“Contingent Warrants”).

Each share of Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at the holder’s option, at any time, into 434.782 shares of the Company’s common stock. This conversion rate represents an equivalent conversion price of approximately $2.30 per share of common stock. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, andstock distributions, reorganizations and similarother events affecting the common stock.

Each share of Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000. Dividends accrue at thea rate of 15% of the liquidation preference per year and accumulate if not paid quarterly. The CompanyDividends may pay dividends,be paid, at its option,the Company’s election, as restricted by applicable debt covenants, in cash, common stock (based on the market value of the common stock) or a combination thereof. AtNo dividends have been declared or paid on the Convertible Preferred Stock through December 31, 2009,2010. If the Company had accrueddoes not declare or pay dividends or if dividends are in arrears for an aggregate number of days equal to six calendar quarters, the holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to elect two new directors to the Company’s board of directors at each meeting until all accumulated and unpaid dividends of $900,000.have been fully paid or set aside for payment.

TheAfter February 11, 2010, the Company may at its option (but not earlier than February 12, 2010), automatically convert the preferred shares into common shares if the closing price of the common stock is equal to or greater than 150% of the then current conversion price for any 15 trading days during any 30 consecutive trading day period. If the Convertible Preferred Stock is automatically convertsconverted and the Company has not previously paid holders amounts equal to at least eight quarterly dividends, on the Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company will alsobe obligated pay to the holders, in connection with any automatic conversion, an amount, in cash or shares of common stock, equal to the value of eight quarterly dividendsdividend payments less any dividends previously paid to holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock.paid.

The Company may redeem any of the Convertible Preferred Stock beginning on August 12, 2012. The initial redemption price will be 105% of the liquidation preference, declining to 102.5% on August 12, 2013, and to 100% on or after August 12, 2014, in each case plusinclusive of all accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Exercisable Warrants are immediately will exercisable and will expire if not exercised by August 12, 2014. The Contingent warrantsWarrants became exercisable on November 9, 2009 and will expire if not exercised by November 9, 2014. Both the Exercisable Warrants and Contingent Warrants contain anti-dilution price protection in the event the Company issues shares of common stock or securities exercisable for or convertible into common stock at a price per share less than theirthe warrant’s exercise price. Due to the anti-dilution price adjustment provision in the warrant agreements, the warrants are not considered equity and are recorded at fair value as a warrant liability when issued. Warrant liability is adjusted to fair value through the statement of operations at the end of each reporting period over the life of the warrants. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the value of the warrant liability at the end of each reporting period.

The gross proceeds from the issuance of the Units were allocated, at the date of the transaction, based on the relative fair values ofupon the preferred stock and the warrants.warrants relative fair values. In order to calculate the relative fair values, the Company obtained third-party valuations ofto assist in establishing the fair value of the debt and equity components of the Units. The initial fair value of the warrants was determined usingwith the Black-Scholes option pricingoption-pricing model using a five-year term, volatility of 54%, a risk freerisk-free rate of return of 2.7% and an assumed dividend rate of zero. The initial fair value of the preferred stock component was determined via separatebased upon external third party valuations of the conversion rights and the host contract. The initial fair value of the conversion rights were determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation of the Company’s possible future stock prices, which drovegenerated potential conversion outcomes. Due to a lack of comparable transactions by companies with similar credit ratings, the initial value of the host contract was determined by applying a risk-adjusted rate of return to the annual dividend. At the date of the transaction, the Company recorded approximately 68% of the proceeds or $10.8 million (net of the discount resulting from the allocation of the proceeds to the warrants) as preferred stock in stockholders’ equity and the detacheddetachable warrants were recorded in additional paid-in capital atas a warrant liability with a fair value of $5.2 million.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 51


Back to Contents

The Company determined that the embedded conversion option within the preferred stock was beneficial (had intrinsic value) to the holders of the preferred stock. The initial intrinsic value of the conversion option was determined to be $5.2 million and was recognized as a beneficial conversion discount with an offset to additional paid-in capital at the date of the transaction.

The conversion period for the preferred stock was estimated to be 36 months based onupon an evaluation of the conversion options. The accretion of the discount on the preferred stock recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $5.1 million and $1.3 million.million, respectively, including the effect of the conversions which occurred during the annual 2010 twelve month period (described in “Conversions of Preferred Stock” below).

The change in the fair value of the warrants from date of issuance through December 31, 2010 has been recorded in the statement of operations. The fair value of the warrants has been calculated at each period end using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. At December 31, 2010, inputs for the fair value calculation included the actual remaining term of the warrants (approximately four years), volatility of 68.0%, risk-free rate of return of 1.5%, and an assumed dividend rate of zero. At December 31, 2009, inputs for the fair value calculation included the actual remaining term of the warrants of approximately five years, volatility of 55.8%, risk-free rate of return of 2.7%, and an assumed dividend rate of zero.

Conversions of Preferred Stock

During March,the year ended December 31, 2010, holders of 2,7804,795 shares of preferred stock elected conversion into 1,208,692approximately 2.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 19).

On March 31, 2010, the stock warrants were repriced because of their anti-dilution price protectionstock. The Company did not receive any proceeds as a result of share issuances in connectionthe conversions. The holders of the preferred stock; however, forfeited $0.7 million of accrued and unpaid dividends on the converted shares. The forfeitures are reported as a reduction of accrued dividends. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had accrued and unpaid dividends on preferred stock of $2.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

Upon conversion of the preferred stock, the Company recognized the proportional unamortized discount as additional accretion of discount on preferred stock.

Re-pricing and Exercises of Stock Warrants

The Exercisable and Contingent Warrants both contain anti-dilution price protection. In accordance with contractual anti-dilution price adjustment provisions, the warrants, were re-priced as a result of payment of a portion of deferred commitment fees with common stock on March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 (See Note 11). During 2010, warrants were exercised to purchase approximately 3.9 million shares of the Company’s amended and restated credit agreement (see Note 19).common stock. At December 31, 2010, warrants to purchase up to 5,853,350 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 per share remain outstanding.

NOTE 15  Common Stock

Note 15—Capital Stock

The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended November 9, 2009, authorizes the Company to issue up to 80,000,00080.0 million shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 100,000 shares of one or more series of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

On July 11, 2007,A reconciliation of the Company effected a two-for-onechange in issued shares of the Company’s common stock split induring the form of a 100% stock dividend to stockholders of recordyear ended December 31, 2010 is as of July 3, 2007. All share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.follows:

Shares issued at December 31, 2009

24,168,292

Issued upon conversion of preferred stock

2,084,776

Issued in exchange of convertible notes

1,568,874

Issued in payment of debt issuance costs

4,042,241

Issued upon exercise of warrants

3,922,854

Issued as restricted stock award grants

826,575

Issued upon exercise of stock options

140,279

SHARES ISSUED AT DECEMBER 31, 2010

36,753,891

Stock-Based Incentive Plans

Stockholders approved Long Term Incentive Planslong term incentive plans in 2010, 2007, 2005 and 2003 (the “2010” Plan, the “2007 Plan,” the “2005 Plan” and the “2003 Plan,” respectively) under which the Company may grant equity awards to officers, key

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

employees, and non-employee directors in the form of stock options, restricted stock and certain other incentive awards. TheAt December 31, 2010, the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2010 Plan, 2007 Plan, 2005 Plan and 2003 Plan are 2,200,000, 1,900,0004.0 million, 2.2 million, 1.9 million and 1,400,000,1.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009, theThe Company had 182,790approximately 2.6 million shares remaining to be granted under the 20072010 Plan and 121,2320.1 million shares remaining to be granted under both the 2007 and 2005 Plans at December 31, 2010. No shares remain to be granted under the 2003 Plan. At December 31, 2009,2010, options to purchase a total of 1,605,3981.6 million shares wereremain outstanding under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plans.long term incentive plans.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 52


Back to Contents

Stock Options

All stock options have beenare granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options currently expire no later than ten years from the date of grant date and generally vest overwithin four years or less. Proceeds received from exercises of stock optionsoption exercises are credited to common stock and additional paid-in capital.capital, as appropriate. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and these estimatesforfeitures. Estimates are adjusted when actual forfeitures differ from the estimate.estimates. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded only for thoseequity awards that are expected to vest.

The fair value of stock-based awards onat the date of grant is computedcalculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. model and metrics provided below.

The risk free interest rate is based on the implied yield of U.S.US Treasury zero-coupon securities that correspond to the expected life of the option. Volatility wasis estimated based on the historical and implied volatilities of the Company’s stock and a group of identified companies considered peers.to be representative peers of the Company. The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that theythe options are expected to beremain outstanding. The Company uses the “simplified” method which is allowed for those companies that cannot reasonably estimate the expected life of options based on its historical share option exercise experience. The Company does not expect to pay dividends on its common stock. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model for stock options granted were as follows:include:

   Years Ended December 31,
   2009  2008  2007

Risk-free interest rate

  1.29% - 2.32%  2.30%  4.06% - 4.82%

Expected volatility of common stock

  68.8% - 71.7%  47.0%  39.7% - 42.0%

Expected life of options in years

  3.5* and 4.25  4.25  3.5 and 5.0

Dividend yield

  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%

Vesting period in years

  0.4 - 4.0  4.0  1.0 - 4.0

*

In 2009, a grant was made to an optionee for whom the Company was able to reasonably estimate the expected life of the award.

Year ended December 31,

2010

2009

2008

Risk-free interest rate

.55% - 2.275%

1.29% - 2.32%

2.30%

Expected volatility of common stock

61.4% - 69.3%

68.8% - 71.7%

47.0%

Expected life of options in years

3.34* - 6.25

3.50* and 4.25

4.25

Dividend yield

0%

0%

0%

Vesting period in years

3.4 - 6.3

0.4 - 4.0

4.0

* In 2010 and 2009, grants were made to an optionee for whom the Company was able to reasonably estimate the expected life of the award.

The Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model was developed for estimatingto estimate the fair value of fully-transferable traded options that havewith no vesting restrictions and are fully-transferable. Becauserestrictions. As option valuation models require the use of subjective assumptions, changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the options.calculations. The Company’s options doare not have the characteristicscharacteristic of fully-transferable traded options, andoptions; therefore, the option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Company’s options.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 20092010 is as follows:

Options

  Shares  Weighted-
Average
Exercise

Price
  Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in
years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding as of January 1, 2009

  857,251   $9.57    

Granted

  1,240,132    1.99    

Exercised

  (100,000  0.30    

Forfeited and expired

  (391,985  6.12    
         

Outstanding as of December 31, 2009

  1,605,398   $5.13  7.61  $171,367
              

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2009

  1,532,958   $5.19  7.55  $168,842
              

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2009

  481,411   $8.36  4.54  $71,367
              

Options

Shares

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding as of January 1, 2010

1,605,398

$

5.13

Granted

604,359

2.06

Exercised

(140,279)

0.30

Forfeited

(14,043)

8.14

Expired

(450,300)

6.76

Outstanding as of December 31, 2010

1,605,135

$

3.90

8.42

$

4,208,345

Vested or expected to vest as of December 31, 2010

1,545,746

$

3.41

8.39

$

4,063,028

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2010

745,786

$

3.73

7.85

$

2,071,845

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options grantedat grant date during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $1.02, $1.07 and 2007 was $1.07, $4.37 and $7.21 per share, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 was $0.01 million, $0.1 million $9.0 million and $12.3$9.0 million, respectively. The total fair value of stock options vestedvesting during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 was $0.8 million, $0.4 million $1.0 million and $0.0$1.0 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2009,2010, there was $1.3$0.9 million of total measured but unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options. TheThis cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.32.2 years. The tax benefit realized from stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20092010 was not material.immaterial.

Restricted Stock

The Company grants employees either time-vesting restricted shares or performance-based restricted shares under itsin accordance with applicable terms underlying Restricted Stock Agreements (“RSAs”). Time-vesting restricted shares vest after a stipulated period of time afterhas elapsed subsequent to the date of grant, date, generally four to five years. Certain time-vested shares have also been issued with a portion of the grantshares granted vesting immediately at the date of grant.immediately. Performance-based restricted shares are issued with annual performance criteria defined over four-yeara designated performance periodsperiod and vest only when, and if, certain annual segment or Companythe outlined performance criteria areis met. Grantees of restricted shares retain voting rights for the granted shares.shares granted.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 53


Back to Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the Company awarded 894,006 RSAs826,575 restricted stock shares to certain employees under the 2007 Plan. All of these RSAsawards were time-vesting. A summary of restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 20092010 is as follows:

Restricted Stock

  Shares  Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Non-vested at January 1, 2009

  233,498   $24.51

Granted

  894,006    1.18

Vested

  (515,701  2.32

Forfeited

  (152,688  5.72
     

Non-vested at December 31, 2009

  459,115   $10.26
       

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company paid certain accrued bonuses through the issuance of 471,000 shares of restricted stock which were immediately vested.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Restricted Stock

Shares

Weighted-Average
Fair Value -
Date of Grant

Non-vested at January 1, 2010

459,115

$

10.26

Granted

826,575

1.88

Vested

(401,570)

10.15

Forfeited

(23,326)

11.75

NON-VESTED AT DECEMBER 31, 2010

860,794

$

2.22

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of shares of restricted stock granted during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $1.88, $1.18 and 2007 was $1.18, $15.13, and $26.22, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 was $4.2 million, $1.2 million, and $2.2 million, and zero, respectively. At December 31, 2009,2010, there was $4.0$1.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock.stock awards. The costreferenced unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.52.2 years.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

Non-cash share-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock grants wastotaled $4.7 million, $1.7 million $2.5 million and $1.7$2.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.

Treasury Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company purchased 34,890 shares of its common stock in payment of income tax withholding owed by employees upon vesting of restricted shares. Additionally, shares previously issued as restricted stock awards to employees were forfeited during 2009 and accounted for as treasury stock. The Company accounts for treasury stock using the cost method and includes treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ equity. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company purchased 195,442 shares and 34,890 shares of the Company’s common stock at market value as payment of income tax withholding owed by employees upon vesting of restricted shares. Shares previously issued as restricted stock awards to employees that were forfeited during 2010 and 2009 were also accounted for as treasury stock.

The Company currently does not have ornor intend to initiate a share repurchase program.

Share Lending Agreement

Concurrent with the offering of the 5.25% convertible senior notes in February 2008 Notes, the Company entered into a share lending agreement (the “ShareShare Lending Agreement”)Agreement with Bear, Stearns International Limited (the “Borrower”). Under the Share Lending Agreement, the Company agreed to loan 3,800,000loaned 3.8 million shares of common stock (the “Borrowed Shares”) to the Borrower during a period beginningcommencing February 11, 2008 and ending on February 15, 2028. The Company may terminate the Share Lending Agreement earlier, upon written notice to the Borrower that the entire principal balance of the convertible notes ceases to beis no longer outstanding or upon agreement withof the Borrower. The Borrower is only permitted to use the Borrowed Shares only for the purpose ofto directly or indirectly facilitating thefacilitate sale of the convertible senior notes and the establishment of2008 Notes or to establish hedge positions byfor holders of the convertible senior notes.2008 Notes. The Company did not require collateral in support of the Share Lending Agreement.

In February 2008, the Borrower borrowed all 3,800,0003.8 million shares available under the Share Lending Agreement. The number of shares isBorrowed Shares are subject to certain adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits, or reverse stock splits or any activity which changeimpacts the number of shares of common stock outstanding. The Company did not receive any proceeds for the Borrowed Shares, but the Company did receive a nominal loan fee of $0.0001 for each share loaned to the Borrower. The Borrower receivedretains all proceeds from any sale of the Borrowed Shares pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement. Upon conversion of the convertible senior notes,2008 Notes, a number of Borrowed Shares proportional to the conversion rate for such notes must be returned to the Company. Any borrowed sharesBorrowed Shares returned to the Company cannot be re-borrowed.

The Borrowed Shares are issued and outstanding for corporate law purposes, andpurposes; accordingly, the holders of the Borrowed Shares have all of the rights of a holder of the Company’s outstanding shares, including the right to vote the shares on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders and the right to receive any dividends or other distributions that the Company may pay or make on its outstanding shares of common stock. However, underUnder the Share Lending Agreement,Agreement; however, the Borrower has agreed to pay to the Company, within one business day after the

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a relevant payment date, an amount equal to any cash dividends that the Company pays on the Borrowed Shares, and to pay or deliver to the Company, upon termination of the loan of Borrowed Shares, any other distribution, in liquidation or otherwise, that the Company makeshas made on the Borrowed Shares.

To the extent the Borrowed Shares lent under the Share Lending Agreement have not been sold or returned to the Company, the Borrower has contractually agreed that it will not to vote any such borrowed sharesBorrowed Shares of which it is the record owner.owner of record. The Borrower has also agreed under the Share Lending Agreement that it will not to transfer or dispose of any borrowed shares,Borrowed Shares, other than to its affiliates, unless such transfer or disposition is pursuant to a registration statement that is effective under the Securities Act. However, investorsInvestors that purchase the shares from the Borrower (and any subsequent transferees of such purchasers) will be; however, are entitled to the same voting rights with respect to those shares as any other holder of common stock.

In May 2008, JP Morgan Chase & Co. completed itsthe acquisition of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., at which time the Borrower became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Company.

Contractual undertakings of the borrowerBorrower have the effect of substantially eliminating the economic dilution that otherwise would result from the issuance of the borrowed shares, andBorrowed Shares. Further, all shares outstanding under the Share Lending Agreement are required to be returned to the Company in the future. As a result, the shares of the Company’s stock lent under the Share Lending Agreement are not considered to be outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earningsloss per share.share or included in the section 382 limitation calculation.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 54


Back to Contents

Note 16—NOTE 16Commitments and Contingencies

Class Action Litigation

On August 7, 2009, a class action suit was commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of the Company between May 8, 2007 and January 23, 2008, inclusive, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that, throughout the time period indicated, the Company failed to disclose material adverse facts about its true financial condition, business and prospects. Specifically, the complaint alleges that as a result of the failure to disclose the adverse facts, the Company’s positive statements concerning guidance and prospects were lacking in a reasonable basis at all relevant times. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on February 4, 2010 alleging misleading statements and material omissions in connection with the Company’s earnings guidance for 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2007. The amended complaint does not quantify the alleged actual damages.

Since August 7, 2009, several other class action suits have been commenced by others concerning the foregoing matters.

The Company intends to mount a vigorous defense to these claims. Discovery has not yet commenced. At this time, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the outcome of this litigation.

Other Litigation

The Company is subject to routine litigation and other claims that arise in the normal course of business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened lawsuits or proceedings which would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Common Stock Listing on the New York Stock Exchange

The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)(“NYSE”) under the stocker ticker symbol “FTK”. Under the NYSE’s continued listing standards, a company is considered to be below compliance standards if, among other things, both itsthe average global market capitalization is less than $50 million over a 30 trading-day period and itsthe stockholders’ equity isare both less than $50 million. The Company failed to meet this compliance standardreceived notification of non-compliance during the fourth quarter of 2009, and it was notified by2009. At such time the NYSE on December 28, 2009 that it had fallen below one ofrequired the continued listing standards.Company to file a plan addressing the compliance breach and the Company proposed remedy.

In March 2010, the Company submitted a plan of action to the NYSE that outlines itsoutlined the Company’s plan to achieve compliance with the NYSE continued listing standards within the 18-month cure period which endsending in June 2011. During implementation and execution of the plan of action, the Company’s common stock will continuecontinues to be listed and traded on the NYSE, subject to the Company’s compliance with other NYSE continued listing requirements.

The Company recently returned to compliant levels; however, the NYSE reserves the right to monitor the Company until the end of the compliance plan period. If the Company remains compliant to the end of the plan period, the Company will be reinstated in accordance with continued listing standards.

Operating Lease Commitments

The Company has entered into operating leases for office space, vehicles and equipment. Future minimum lease payments under operating leases at December 31, 20092010 are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31,

Minimum Lease Payments

2011

$

1,508

2012

1,039

2013

357

2014

74

2015

73

Thereafter

1,356

TOTAL

$

4,407

Year Ending December 31,

   

2010

  $1,763

2011

   1,487

2012

   1,224

2013

   452

2014

   94

Thereafter

   1,430
    

Total

  $6,450
    

Total rentRent expense under operating leases totaled approximately $2.0 million, $2.3 million $1.7 million and $1.5$1.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.

401(k) Retirement Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement plan for the benefit of eligible employees in the United States.US. All employees are eligible forto participate in the plan upon date of employment. As of January 1, 2008, the Company increased itsthe Company’s match to 100% of each employee’s 401(k) contribution up to 4% of qualified compensation. In April 2009, the Company discontinued the matching employee’sof employees’ 401(k) contributions. The consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 include compensation expense of approximately $322,000, $940,000$0.3 million and $89,000,$0.9 million, respectively, related to the Company’s 401(k) match.matching. Due to the discontinuation of 401(K) matching in 2009, no related compensation expense was recognized in 2010. As of January 1, 2011, the Company reinstated a Company match of 50% on employee 401(k) contributions of up to 4% of qualified compensation.

Concentrations and Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consistinclude of trade accounts receivable and cash. Theas the Company does not generally require collateral in support of its trade receivables. CashIn addition, the majority of cash and cash equivalents are maintained at one major financial institution and the balances often exceed insurable amounts.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Essentially allThe majority of revenue is derived from the oil and natural gas industry. This concentration of customers in one industry increases credit and business risk, particularly given the recent volatility of activity levels inwithin the industry. Customers include major integrated oil and natural gas companies, independent oil and natural gas companies, pressure pumping service companies and state-owned national oil companies. The Company’s top three customers accounted for 22%18%, 26%22% and 25%26% of consolidated revenuesrevenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.

Certain raw materials used by the Chemical and LogisticsChemicals segment in the manufacture of micro-emulsion chemical salesproducts are availableobtainable from limited sources. Certain mud-motor inventory parts in the Drilling Products segment and stock parts in the Artificial Lift segment are primarily sourced from China.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 55


Back to Contents

Note 17—NOTE 17Segment Information

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise aboutfor which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-makerdecision-makers in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessingassess performance.

The Company has determined that there areis comprised of three reportable segments:segments; Chemicals, Drilling, and Artificial Lift:

The Chemicals and Logistics segment is made upconsists of two business units. The specialty chemical business unitdivisions: 1) Specialty Chemicals and 2) Logistics. Specialty Chemicals designs, develops, manufactures, packages and sells chemicals used by oilfield service companies in oil and natural gas well drilling, cementing, stimulation and production.production activities. The logistics business unitLogistics division manages automated bulk material handling, loading facilities, and blending capabilities of bulk materials for oilfield service companies.

The Drilling Products segment rents, inspects, manufactures and markets downholedown-hole drilling equipment for theused in energy, mining, water well and industrial drilling sectors.activities.

The Artificial Lift segment manufactures and markets artificial lift equipment, which includesincluding the Petrovalve line of beam pump components, electric submersible pumps and gas separators, valves and services tothat support coal bed methane production.production activities.

The Company evaluates performance based onupon several factors, of which thecriteria. The primary financial measure is business segment income before taxes. CertainVarious functions, including certain sales and marketing activities and corporate general and administrative expenses,activities, are provided centrally fromby the corporate office. The costs of theseCosts associated with corporate office functions, together with other corporate income and expense anditems as well as estimated income tax provision (benefit)provisions (benefits), are not allocated to thesereportable segments. The accounting policies ofIntersegment revenue is not considered material to the business segments are the same as those described in “Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Inter-segment sales are accounted for at fair value as if sales were to third parties. Intersegment revenues are not material.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

consolidated financial statements.

Summarized financial information concerning theregarding reportable segments as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 is shown in the following table (in thousands):

Chemicals and Logistics

Drilling
Products

Artificial Lift

Corporate

and Other

Total

  Chemicals
and
Logistics
  Drilling
Products
 Artificial
Lift
 Corporate
and

Other
 Total 

2009

       

Net revenues from external customers

  $49,296  $50,774   $12,480   $   $112,550  

2010

Net revenue from external customers

$

66,121

$

65,782

$

15,079

$

-

$

146,982

Gross margin

   21,667   4,781    2,936        29,384  

29,249

18,991

4,730

-

52,970

Income (loss) from operations

   12,964   (32,084  1,161    (15,144  (33,103

19,833

(9,738)

3,070

(19,432)

(6,267)

Depreciation and amortization

   1,844   11,826    292    224    14,186  

1,671

11,445

219

430

13,765

Total assets

   33,053   119,960    7,084    18,513    178,610  

44,102

102,949

9,062

28,694

184,807

Capital expenditures

   291   6,189    42    33    6,555  

1,227

4,679

32

122

6,060

2008

       

Net revenues from external customers

  $109,356  $98,262   $18,445   $   $226,063  

2009

Net revenue from external customers

$

49,296

$

50,774

$

12,480

$

-

$

112,550

Gross margin

   49,119   36,897    4,740        90,756  

21,667

4,781

2,936

-

29,384

Income (loss) from operations

   37,433   (43,840  (6,709  (17,635  (30,751

12,964

(32,084)

1,161

(15,144)

(33,103)

Depreciation and amortization

   1,782   10,121    633    308    12,844  

1,844

11,826

292

224

14,186

Total assets

   44,060   176,287    16,104    (1,876  234,575  

33,053

119,960

7,084

18,804

178,901

Capital expenditures

   2,464   19,840    293    1,114    23,711  

291

6,189

42

33

6,555

2007

       

Net revenues from external customers

  $86,271  $56,836   $14,901   $   $158,008  

2008

Net revenue from external customers

$

109,356

$

98,262

$

18,445

$

-

$

226,063

Gross margin

   40,474   19,132    3,841        63,447  

49,119

36,897

4,740

-

90,756

Income (loss) from operations

   32,389   5,632    1,381    (9,716  29,686  

37,433

(43,840)

(6,709)

(17,635)

(30,751)

Depreciation and amortization

   960   4,909    557    111    6,537  

1,782

10,121

633

308

12,844

Total assets

   42,849   97,730    17,827    2,387    160,793  

44,060

176,287

16,104

(1,492)

234,959

Capital expenditures

   6,313   8,532    653    174    15,672  

2,464

19,840

293

1,114

23,711

One customer and its affiliates accounted for $16.9 million, $18.7 million $44.6 million and $32.8$44.6 million of consolidated revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively. Over 90%97% of this revenue related to sales by the Chemicals and Logistics segment.segment for all years.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 56


Back to Contents

Revenue by country is determined based onupon the location of services provided and products sold. Revenue by geographic location is as follows (in thousands):

  Years Ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

  2009  2008  2007

2010

2009

2008

United States

  $97,737  $208,228  $150,433

$

127,285

$

97,737

$

208,228

Other countries

   14,813   17,835   7,575

19,697

14,813

17,835

         

Total

  $112,550  $226,063  $158,008
         

TOTAL

$

146,982

$

112,550

$

226,063

Long-lived assets held in countries other than the U.S.US are not material.considered material to the consolidated financial statements.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTE 18

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

  First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 
  (in thousands, except per share data) 

(in thousands, except per share data)

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

2010

Revenue

$

28,370

$

31,174

$

39,982

$

47,456

Gross margin

8,012

11,351

16,067

17,540

Net loss

(9,513)

(6,162)

(1,163)

(26,627)

Loss per share:

Basic and diluted

(0.60)

(0.28)

(0.09)

(0.95)

2009

     

Revenue

  $40,676   $23,503   $23,818   $24,553  

$

40,676

$

23,503

$

23,818

$

24,553

Gross margin

   12,491    3,647    6,404    6,842  

12,491

3,648

6,403

6,842

Net loss

   (1,980  (19,793  (22,363  (6,569

(2,003)

(19,817)

(23,175)

(5,338)

Loss per share:

     

Basic

   (0.10  (1.01  (1.18  (0.41

Diluted

   (0.10  (1.01  (1.18  (0.41

2008

     

Revenue

  $46,471   $56,809   $62,787   $59,996  

Gross margin

   18,821    24,698    26,675    20,562  

Net income (loss)

   3,209    4,439    5,173    (46,982

Earnings (loss) per share:

     

Basic

   0.17    0.23    0.27    (2.45

Diluted

   0.17    0.23    0.27    (2.45

Basic and diluted

(0.10)

(1.01)

(1.22)

(0.35)

(1) The sum of the quarterly loss per share applicable to common stockholders (basic and diluted) does not agree to the loss per share for the year due to the timing of common stock issuances.

(1) The sum of the quarterly loss per share applicable to common stockholders (basic and diluted) does not agree to the loss per share for the year due to the timing of common stock issuances.

Note 19—NOTE 19Subsequent Events

New Credit Agreement with Whitebox Advisors, LLC

Payments of Preferred Stock Dividends and Conversion of Preferred Stock into Shares of Common Stock

On March 31, 2010,January 6, 2011, the Company executed an Amendedpaid all accumulated and Restated Credit Agreement with Whitebox Advisors, LLC, as administrative agent for a syndicate of lenders, for a $40 million term loan. This new senior credit facility refinanced the Company’s existing senior credit facility at Wells Fargo Bank and provided net proceeds of $6.1 million to the Company.

The indebtedness under the new senior credit facility matures November 1, 2012 and has scheduled cash principal payments of $750,000 in 2010, $3,750,000 in 2011, $3,000,000 in 2012 with and the remaining unpaid principal balance due at maturity. Interest is payable quarterly. The Company has the option to either pay the total amount of interest due in cash or to pay a portion of the interest in cash and capitalize the balance of the interest, thereby increasing the principal amount of the new senior credit facility. The annualized cash interest rate is 12.5% when the principal balance exceeds $30 million, 11.5% when the principal balance is $20 million or more but not in excess of $30 million, and 10.5% when the principal balance is less than $20 million. If the Company elects to capitalize a portion of the interest, the annualized cash interest rate is 8% and additional interest is capitalized and added to the principal amount of the new senior credit facility at a annualized rate of 6% when the principal balance exceeds $30 million, 4.5% when the principal balance is $20 million or more but not in excess of $30 million, and 3.5% when the principal balance is less than $20 million.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement requires additional mandatory principal payments of (a) 50% of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization) in excess of $4.5 million in any fiscal quarter, (b) 50% of cash proceeds in excess of $5 million and up to $15 million from certain asset disposals, plus 75% of cash proceeds in excess of $15 million from certain asset disposals, (c) 75% of any Federal income tax refunds, and (d) $1 million of principal on quarterly payment dates, when the Company’s stock price is equal to or greater than $1.27 per share, payable by issuing common stock (based on 95% of the volume-weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding ten trading days).

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for a commitment fee of $7,300,000, payable as follows: (a) $925,975 in cash at closing, (b) $4,374,025 through the issuance of 3,431,133 shares of common stock at closing (based on 95% of the volume-weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding ten trading

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

days), (c) $1,000,000 payable in September 2010 in cash or common stock (based on 90% of the greater of the volume-weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding ten trading days or $1.27 per share), and (d) $1,000,000 payable in March 2011 in cash or common stock (based on 85% of the greater of the volume-weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding ten trading days or $1.27 per share). The election as to whether the commitment fee for (c) and (d) is payable in cash or common stock is made by the Company if the volume-weighted average price of the common stock is $1.00 or more per share and by the lenders if such average is less than $1.00 per share at the payment date.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement does not contain a revolving line of credit facility or quarterly and annual financial covenants. The credit agreement restricts the payment of dividends on the Company’s common stock without the prior written consentoutstanding shares of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock. The payment, at an annual rate of 15% of the lenders.

Exchange Agreement for Convertible Senior Notes

On Marchliquidation preference, covered the period from issuance, August 12, 2009, through December 31, 2010,2010. In accordance with the Company executed an Exchange Agreement with Whitebox Advisors, LLC andCertificate of Designations governing the syndicate of lenders underpreferred stock, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement related to the Company’s new senior credit facility. The Exchange Agreement permits each lender to exchange the Company’s convertible senior notes (See Note 9) which they hold, up to the principal amount of its participation in the new $40 million term loan, for new convertible senior secured notes and shares of the Company’s common stock.

The current 5.25% convertible senior notes due 2028dividends were issued in February 2008 (the “2008 Notes”). Upon closing of the exchange, investors will receive, for each $1,000 principal amount of the 2008 Notes exchanged, (a) new 5.25% convertible senior secured notes due 2028 in a principal amount of $900 (the “2010 Notes”) and (b) $50 in shares of the Company’s common stock (based on the greater of 95% of the volume-weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding ten trading days or the closing price of the common stock on the day before the closing. The 2010 Notes have the same interest rate, conversion rights, conversion rate, Company redemption rights and guarantees as the 2008 Notes, except that in addition they are also secured by a second priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Company expects to exchange $40 million of convertible senior notes for the aggregate consideration of $36 million in new convertible senior secured notes and $2 millionpaid in shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company expects to issue up to 1,568,867Dividends per share of $208.33 were paid in shares of common stock valued at $4.81, based upon the prior ten business day volume-weighted average price per share. Fractional shares were paid in cash.

On February 4, 2011, the Company exercised the right to satisfy the common stock componentconvert all outstanding shares of the exchange.

Re-pricing of Stock Warrants

In connection with the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement related to the Company’s new senior credit facility, the stock warrants issued in August 2009 in connection with the issuance of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock (see Note 14) have been re-priced, effectiveinto shares of common stock at the prevailing conversion rate of 434.782 shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock. The Company issued 4,871,719 shares of common stock for preferred shares converted during 2011, including those converted upon the mandatory conversion. In accordance with the Certificate of Designations governing the preferred stock, holders of preferred shares subject to the mandatory conversion were entitled to a total of eight quarters of dividend payments. At the date of the mandatory conversion a dividend per share of $91.67 was paid in shares of common stock valued at $6.63, based upon the prior ten business day volume-weighted average price per share. Fractional shares were paid in cash.

Exercise of Stock Warrants

From January 1 through March 31, 2010. The exercisable1, 2011, warrants and the contingent warrants both contained anti-dilution price protection. As a result of this new pricing, the Company now has outstanding warrantswere exercised to purchase up to 10,480,0002,176,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price$1.21 per share. The Company received cash proceeds of $1.27 per share.

Conversion of Preferred Stock

Each share of the Company’s cumulative convertible preferred stock is convertible at the holder’s option, at any time, into 434.782 shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 14). In March 2010, holders of 2,780 shares of preferred stock elected conversion into 1,208,692 shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversions did not change the Company’s total stockholders’ equity, and the Company did not receive any proceeds from the conversions.

NYSE Continued Listing Requirements

On March 29, 2010, the NYSE agreed to accept the Company’s plan of action to the NYSE which the Company believes will allow it to achieve compliance$2.6 million in connection with the minimum listing requirements of the NYSE no later than June 28, 2011.

warrants exercised.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 57


Back to Contents

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

ITEM 9  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A(T).Controls and Procedures.

Conclusion Regarding the EffectivenessITEM 9A  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain

The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that such information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. OurThe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures include controls and proceduresare also designed to ensure that such information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including ourthe principal executive and principal financial officer,officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving theirthat control objectives. Ourobjectives are attained. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurance.

OurThe Company’s management, with the participation of ourthe principal executive and principal financial officer,officers, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of ourthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009,2010, as required by Rule 13a-1513a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based onupon that evaluation, ourthe principal executive and principal financial officerofficers have concluded that ourthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 20092010 due to thea material weaknessesweakness in internal control relating to the Company’s preparation of itsthe Company’s financial statements.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

Our

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in RulesRule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) underof the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. It should be noted, however, that because of inherent limitations, any system of internal controls, however well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that financial reporting objectives will be met. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

OurThe Company’s management, including ourthe principal executive officer and principal financial officer,officers, assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). As a result of that entitled “Internal Control—Integrated Framework.” Upon evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officerthe Company’s management identified the following control deficiencies that constituted material weaknessesregarding timeliness and effective preparation of account reconciliations in connection with the preparation of our financial statementsmonthly close process. The deficiencies identified constitute a material weakness in internal control as of December 31, 2009.

Control environment – We did not maintain an effective control environment. The control environment, which is the responsibility of senior management, sets the tone of the organization, influences the control consciousness of its people, and is the foundation for all other components of internal control over financial reporting. We did not maintain an effective control environment because of the following:

a)

We did not maintain an appropriate level of senior management and Board level oversight related to financial reporting and internal controls due to turnover in these positions during the year.

b)

We did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of GAAP consistent with our financial reporting requirements.

c)

We did not maintain sufficient controls related to the monthly financial close process. These control deficiencies included:

inadequate analyses of variances in our statement of operations from expected and historical results;

the absence of an adequate journal entry review process by supervisory accounting personnel; and

excessive user access permissions within our accounting system.

Because of the material weaknesses described above,2010. Accordingly, management has concluded that ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective in connection with the preparation of ourthe consolidated financial statements during the year endedas of December 31, 2009.2010.

Remediation Plan and Status

Our

The Company’s management under new leadership described below, has beenis actively committed to and engaged in planning for,the implementation and implementationexecution of remediation efforts to addressresolve the material weaknesses,weakness; as well as, to proactively manage any other identified areas of risk. Theserisk that may be identified. In-process remediation efforts outlined below, are intendedwith respect to addressstandardization of the identified material weaknesses and to enhance our overallmonthly financial control environment.close process have not yet been fully completed.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company restructured itsThe Company’s executive management team in order to provide a better reporting and control environment. Responsibilities were reassigned and an emphasis was placed on maintaining a tone and control consciousness that consistently emphasizes adherence to accurate financial reporting and enforcement of policies and procedures.

The Company also appointed two new board members and appointed an existing board member to the audit committee, which successfully filled the vacancies left by previous board member resignations.

In December 2009, the Company hired a national executive services firm to perform an assessment of the Company’s finance and accounting structure. Based upon this assessment, a team of independent consultants was assembled to address the immediate needs identified. Their responsibilities include: (a) overseeing the preparation and filing of selected SEC documents, (b) reinforcing the tactical accounting needs of the Company, (c) identifying and researching reporting issues, (d) assisting with the preparation and modeling of future cash flow and financial forecasts, (e) advising senior management on any financial and accounting issues related to strategic projects, (f) performing an analysis of the month-end close process along with an assessment of the current skill sets of the accounting staff, and (g) recommending changes to the current accounting and finance organizational structure of the Company.

The Company is actively searching for permanent qualified employees to maintain the new accounting and finance functions established by the Company.

We are currently reviewing and implementing remediation steps surrounding the monthly variance analyses in our statement of operations and the journal entry review processes. We have also identified and remediated the system access rights issues by restricting each employee’s access rights and aligning them with current job responsibilities.

Our new executive management team, together with our Board of Directors isare committed to achieving and maintaining a strong control environment, high ethical standards, and financial reporting integrity.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the fourth quarterthree months ended December 31, 2010, the Company continued implementation and execution of 2009, we began implementing someremediation efforts to standardize the monthly financial close process in order to enhance the effectiveness of the remedial measures described above, including the appointment of our new executive management team and members of the Board of Directors. We have also performed an assessment of ourCompany’s overall financial business processes and our accounting and finance department and have begun implementing the recommendations derived from this assessment.control environment.

Auditor Attestation Report

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subjectFLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 58


Back to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report on internal control in this annual report.Contents

ITEM 9B  Other Information

None.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 59


Back to Contents

Item 9B.Other Information.

PART III    

None.

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

ITEM 10  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information under the caption “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance,” which will be contained in ourthe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2010the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of year end, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

ITEM 11  Executive Compensation

Information under the caption “Executive Compensation,” which will be contained in ourthe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2010the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of year end, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

ITEM 12  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” which will be contained in ourthe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2010the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of year end, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

ITEM 13  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence,” which will be contained in ourthe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2010the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of year end, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

ITEM 14  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information under the caption “Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services,” which will be contained in ourthe Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2010the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of year end, is incorporated herein by reference.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 61


Back to Contents

PART IV

   

ITEM 15  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibit index

Item 15.

Exhibit Number

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Title

Exhibit
Number
3.1

Exhibit Title

  3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).

3.2

Certificate of Designations for Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).

3.3

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).

3.4

Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Appendix F to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 27, 2001).

4.1

Form of Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Appendix E to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 27, 2001).

4.2

Form of Certificate of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Certificate of Designations for Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).

4.3

Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of the Company, dated August 31, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (file no. 333-129308) filed on October 28, 2005).

4.4

Base Indenture, dated February 14, 2008, by and among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2008).

4.5

First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 14, 2008, by and among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2008).

4.6

Form of Global Security (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the First Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2008).

4.7

Form of Exercisable Warrant, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).

4.8

Form of Contingent Warrant, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).

10.1

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated August 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).

10.2

Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated November 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007).

10.3

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated February 4, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2008).

Exhibit
Number
10.4

Exhibit Title

10.4

Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated May 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2009).

10.5

2003 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 27, 2005).

10.6

2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 27, 2005).

10.7

2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007).

10.8

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2006, among Total Energy Technologies, LLC, USA Petrovalve, Inc. and Total Well Solutions, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

10.9

Exclusive License Agreement, dated April 3, 2006, among the Company, USA Petrovalve, Inc. and Total Well Solutions, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

10.10

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated June 6, 2006, among LifTech, LLC, its owners and USA Petrovalve, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).

10.11

Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated October 5, 2006, between Turbeco, Inc. and the owner of a 50% interest in CAVO Drilling Motors, Ltd Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

10.12

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 17, 2006, among Teal Supply Co., dba Triumph Drilling Tools, Inc., Turbeco Inc. and Michael E. Jensen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).

10.13

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 31, 2007, among the Company, SES Holdings, Inc. and the stockholders thereof (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).

10.14

Assignment of Membership Interest, dated November 15, 2007, between Turbeco, Inc. and the owner of the remaining 50% interest in CAVO Drilling Motors, Ltd Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007).

10.15

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 4, 2008, by and among Teledrift Acquisition, Inc., the Company, Teledrift, Inc. and the stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2008).

10.16

Share Lending Agreement among the Company, Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. and Bear Stearns International Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2008).

10.17

Credit Agreement, dated March 31, 2008, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and the Lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).

10.18

Pledge and Security Agreement, dated March 31, 2008, among the Company and the subsidiaries named therein, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).

Exhibit
Number
10.19

Exhibit Title

10.19

Guaranty Agreement, dated March 31, 2008, among the guarantors named therein, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the Lenders named therein, the Issuing Lender named therein and the Swap Counterparties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).

10.20

First Amendment and Temporary Waiver, dated February 25, 2009, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and the Lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2009).

10.21

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated March 13, 2009, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the Lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).

10.22

Third Amendment and Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated August 6, 2009, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the Lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009).

10.23

Waiver Agreement and Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated November 16, 2009, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the Lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).

10.24

Separation and Release Agreement, dated August 5, 2008, between Lisa Meier and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2008).

10.25

Form of Unit Purchase Agreement, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009).

10.26

Retirement Agreement, dated August 11, 2009, between Jerry D. Dumas, Sr. and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009).

10.27

Employment Agreement, dated August 11, 2009, between the Company and Jesse Neyman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009).

10.28

Service Agreement, dated August 11, 2009, among Chisholm Management, Inc., Protechnics II, Inc. and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009).

10.29

Employment Agreement, dated September 1, 2009, between the Company and Scott Stanton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 17, 2009).

10.30

Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2010, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

12*

10.31

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2010, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.32

Form of 5.25% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the First Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.33

Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.34

Lien Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, among the Company, the subsidiaries named therein, Whitebox Advisors LLC and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.35

Junior Lien Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, by the Company and the subsidiaries named therein in favor of U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.36

Junior Lien Patent and Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, by the Company and the subsidiaries named therein in favor of U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.37

Registration Rights Agreement (5.25% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2028), dated March 31, 2010, among the Company and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.38

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, among the Company, Whitebox Advisors LLC and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.39

Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, by the Company and the subsidiary guarantors named therein in favor of Whitebox Advisors LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.40

Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, by the Company and the subsidiaries named therein in favor of Whitebox Advisors LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.41

Amended and Restated Patent and Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2010, by the Company and the subsidiaries named therein, in favor of the secured parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.42

Registration Rights Agreement (Amended and Restated Credit Agreement), dated as of March 31, 2010, among the Company and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010).

10.43

Amended and Restated Service Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2010, between the Company and Protechnics II, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2010).

10.44

Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2010, between the Company and Steve Reeves (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2010).

10.45

Employment Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, between the Company and Johnna Kokenge (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2011).

10.46

2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on July 13, 2010).

12*

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.

21*

List of Subsidiaries.

23.1*

Consent of Hein & Associates, LLP.

23*

23.2*

Consent of UHY LLP.LLP

31.1*

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.

31.2*

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.

32.1*

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.

32.2*

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.

*

Filed herewith.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 64


Back to Contents

SIGNATURES

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.

By:

/s/ JOHN W. CHISHOLM

By:

/s/    JOHN W. CHISHOLM

John W. Chisholm

President

Date:

Interim President

March 16, 2011

Date: March 31, 2010


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature

Title

Date

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ JOHN W. CHISHOLM

John W. Chisholm

Interim President (Principal Executive Officer)

March 31, 2010

16, 2011

/s/ JESSE E. NEYMAN

Jesse E. Neyman

Executive Vice President, Finance and Strategic Planning (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

March 31, 2010

16, 2011

/s/ JERRY D. DUMAS, SR.JOHNNA KOKENGE

Jerry D. Dumas, Sr.Johnna Kokenge

Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

Chairman

March 31, 201016, 2011

/s/ L.V. “BUD” MCGUIRE

L.V. “Bud” McGuire

Director

March 16, 2011

/s/ KENNETH T. HERN

Kenneth T. Hern

Director

Director

March 31, 2010
16, 2011

/s/ JOHN S. REILAND

John S. Reiland

Director

Director

March 31, 201016, 2011

/s/ L. MELVIN COOPER

L. Melvin Cooper

Director

March 16, 2011

/s/ RICHARD O. WILSON

Richard O. Wilson

Director

Director

March 31, 201016, 2011

88FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. – Form 10-K – 65