UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 29, 201028, 2011

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-20355

 

 

Costco Wholesale Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Washington 91-1223280

(State or other jurisdiction of


incorporation or organization)

 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, WA 98027

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(425) 313-8100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on
which registered

Common Stock, $.005 Par Value The NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YESx    NO¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES¨    NOx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YESx    NO¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YESx    NO¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerx

  Accelerated filer¨

Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller company)

  Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨    NOx

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at February 14, 201011, 2011 was $25,866,245,752$32,525,998,477

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of October 1, 2010September 30, 2011 was 432,333,947433,365,150

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders to be held on January 27, 2011,26, 2012, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 


COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 29, 201028, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

      Page

PART I

    

Item 1.

  

Business

  34

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

  910

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

  1617

Item 2.

  

Properties

  1718

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

  1718

Item 4.

  

Removed and Reserved

  1718

PART II

    

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  1819

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

  1920

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  2021

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  36

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  37

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  37

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

  38

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

  38

PART III

    

Item 10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  39

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

  39

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  39

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  39

Item 14.

  

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  39

PART IV

    

Item 15.

  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  39

INFORMATION RELATING TO FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this documentReport constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. They include statements that address activities, events, conditions or developments that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future.future and may relate to such matters as sales growth, increases in comparable store sales, cannibalization of existing locations by new openings, price or fee changes, earnings performance, earnings per share, stock-based compensation expense, warehouse openings and closures, the effect of adopting certain accounting standards, future financial reporting, financing, margins, return on invested capital, strategic direction, expense control, membership renewal rates, shopping frequency, litigation impact and the demand for our products and services. Forward-looking statements may also be identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events, results, or performance to differ materially from those indicated by such statements. Seestatements, including, without limitation, the factors set forth in Item 1A—Risk Factors, for a discussionand other factors noted in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of risksFinancial Condition and uncertainties that may affect our business.Results of Operations, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8 of this Report. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

PART I

Item 1—Business

Costco Wholesale Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Costco”(Costco or the “Company”)Company) began operations in 1983 in Seattle, Washington. In October 1993, we merged with The Price Company, which had pioneered the membership warehouse concept, to form Price/Costco, Inc., a Delaware corporation. In January 1997, after the spin-off of most of our non-warehouse assets to Price Enterprises, Inc., we changed our name to Costco Companies, Inc. On August 30, 1999, we reincorporated from Delaware to Washington and changed our name to Costco Wholesale Corporation. Our common stock trades on Thethe NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “COST.”

We report on a 52/53-week fiscal year, consisting of thirteen four-week periods and ending on the Sunday nearest the end of August. The first three quarters consist of three periods each, and the fourth quarter consists of four periods (five weeks in the thirteenth period in a 53-week year). The material seasonal impact in our operations is an increased level of net sales and earnings during the winter holiday season. References to 2011, 2010, and 2009 relate to the 52-week fiscal years ended August 28, 2011, August 29, 2010, and August 30, 2009, respectively.

The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the operation of membership warehouses in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, through majority-owned subsidiaries in Taiwan and Korea, and a 50% owned joint venture in Mexico (Mexico). At the beginning of fiscal 2011, we began consolidating our Mexico joint venture due to the adoption of a new accounting standard. Mexico’s results previously were accounted for under the equity method and our 50% share was included in “interest income and other, net” in the consolidated statements of income. In the current year, the financial position and results of Mexico’s operations are fully consolidated and the joint venture partner’s 50% share is included in “net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in the consolidated statements of income. The initial consolidation of Mexico increased total assets, liabilities, and revenue by approximately 3%, with no impact on net income or net income per common share attributable to Costco. See discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

General

We operate membership warehouses based on the concept that offering our members low prices on a limited selection of nationally branded and selected private-label products in a wide range of merchandise categories will produce high sales volumes and rapid inventory turnover. This turnover, when combined with the operating efficiencies achieved by volume purchasing, efficient distribution and reduced handling of merchandise in no-frills, self-service warehouse facilities, enables us to operate profitably at significantly lower gross margins than traditional wholesalers, mass merchandisers, supermarkets, and supercenters.

We buy the majority of our merchandise directly from manufacturers and route it to a cross-docking consolidation point (“depot”)(depot) or directly to our warehouses. Our depots receive container-based shipments from manufacturers and reallocate these goods for shipment to our individual warehouses, generally in less than twenty-four hours. This maximizes freight volume and handling efficiencies, eliminating many of the costs associated with traditional multiple-step distribution channels. Such traditional steps include purchasing from distributors as opposed to manufacturers, use of central receiving, storing and distributing warehouses, and storage of merchandise in locations off the sales floor.

Because of our high sales volume and rapid inventory turnover, we generally sell inventory before we are required to pay many of our merchandise vendors, even though we take advantage of early payment discounts when available. To the extent that sales increase and inventory turnover becomes more rapid, a greater percentage of inventory is financed through payment terms provided by suppliers rather than by our working capital.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

Our typical warehouse format averages approximately 143,000 square feet; newer units tend to be slightly larger. Floor plans are designed for economy and efficiency in the use of selling space, the handling of merchandise, and the control of inventory. Because shoppers are attracted principally by the quality of merchandise and the availability of low prices, our warehouses need not have elaborate facilities. By strictly controlling the entrances and exits of our warehouses and using a membership format, we have limited inventory losses (shrinkage) to less than two-tenths of one percent of net sales in the last several fiscal years—well below those of typical discount retail operations.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

We generally limit marketing and promotional activities to new warehouse openings, occasional direct mail to prospective new members, and regular direct marketing programs (such as The Costco Connection, a magazine we publish for our members, coupon mailers, weekly email blasts from costco.com, and handouts) to existing members promoting selected merchandise. These practices result in lower marketing expenses as compared to typical retailers. In connection with new warehouse openings, our marketing teams personally contact businesses in the area that are potential business members. These contacts are supported by direct mailings during the period immediately prior to opening. Potential Gold Star (individual) members are contacted by direct mail or by membership offerings distributed through employee associations and other entities. After a membership base is established in an area, most new memberships result from word-of-mouth advertising, follow-up messages distributed through employee groups, and ongoing direct solicitations to prospective members.

Our warehouses generally operate on a seven-day, 69-hour week, open weekdays between 10:00 a.m. and 8:30 p.m., with earlier weekend closing hours on the weekend.hours. Gasoline operations generally have extended hours. Because the hours of operation are shorter than those of traditional retailers, discount retailers and supermarkets, and due to other efficiencies inherent in a warehouse-type operation, labor costs are lower relative to the volume of sales. Merchandise is generally stored on racks above the sales floor and displayed on pallets containing large quantities, thereby reducing labor required for handling and stocking.

Our strategy is to provide our members with a broad range of high quality merchandise at prices consistently lower than they can obtain elsewhere. We seek to limit specific items in each product line to fast-selling models, sizes, and colors. Therefore, we carry an average of approximately 3,9003,600 active stock keeping units (SKUs) per warehouse in our core warehouse business, as opposed to 45,000 to 140,000 SKUs or more at discount retailers, supermarkets, and supercenters. Many consumable products are offered for sale only in case, carton, or multiple-pack quantities only.

In keeping with our policy of member satisfaction, we generally accept returns of merchandise. On certain electronic items, we generally have a 90-day return policy in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom and provide, free of charge, technical support services, as well as an extended warranty.

Only the 2011 data in the accompanying tables includes Mexico.

The following table indicates the approximate percentage of net sales accounted for by major category of items:

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Sundries(including candy, snack foods, tobacco, alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages and cleaning and institutional supplies)

  23 23 22   22  23  23

Hardlines(including major appliances, electronics, health and beauty aids, hardware, office supplies, garden and patio, sporting goods, toys, seasonal items and automotive supplies)

  18 19 19

Hardlines (including major appliances, electronics, health and beauty aids, hardware, office supplies, cameras, garden and patio, sporting goods, toys, seasonal items and automotive supplies)

   17  18  19

Food(including dry and institutionally packaged foods)

  21 21 20   21  21  21

Softlines(including apparel, domestics, jewelry, housewares, media, home furnishings, cameras and small appliances)

  10 10 10

Softlines(including apparel, domestics, jewelry, housewares, media, home furnishings and small appliances)

   10  10  10

Fresh Food(including meat, bakery, deli and produce)

  12 12 12   12  12  12

Ancillary and Other(including gas stations, pharmacy, food court, optical, one-hour photo, hearing aid and travel)

  16 15 17   18  16  15

Item 1—Business (Continued)

 

Ancillary businesses within or next to our warehouses provide expanded products and services and encourage members to shop more frequently. The following table indicates the number of ancillary businesses in operation at fiscal year end:year-end:

 

  2010   2009   2008   2011   2010   2009 

Food Court

   534     521     506     586     534     521  

One-Hour Photo Centers

   530     518     504     581     530     518  

Optical Dispensing Centers

   523     509     496     574     523     509  

Pharmacies

   480     464     451     529     480     464  

Gas Stations

   343     323     307     368     343     323  

Hearing-Aid Centers

   357     303     274     427     357     303  

Print Shops and Copy Centers

   10     10     7     10     10     10  

Car Washes

   7     2     2     7     7     2  

Number of warehouses

   540     527     512     592     540     527  

Costco Mexico, our 50%-owned joint venture, operatedThe 2010 and 2009 numbers exclude the 32 warehouses at August 29, 2010. We have contractual responsibility for executive, management and functional duties and operations of Costcooperated in Mexico. The Costco Mexico warehouses are not included in the table above as Costco Mexico is accounted for using the equity method of accounting for investments.

Our electronic commerce businesses, costco.com in the U.S. and costco.ca in Canada, provide our members additional products generally not found in our warehouses, in addition to services such as digital photo processing, pharmacy, travel, and membership services.

Our warehouses accept cash, checks, certain debit cards, American Express and a private label Costco credit card. Losses associated with dishonored checks have been minimal, as members who have issued dishonored checks are identified and prevented from making further purchases until restitution is made.

We have direct buying relationships with many producers of national brand-name merchandise. We do not obtain a significant portion of merchandise from any one supplier. We have not experienced any difficulty in obtaining sufficient quantities of merchandise, and believe that if one or more of our current sources of supply became unavailable, we would be able to obtain alternative sources without substantial disruption of our business. We also purchase selected private label merchandise, as long as quality and customer demand are comparable and the value to our members is greater as compared to name brand items.

Certain financial information for our segments and geographic areas is included in Note 12 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

We report on a 52/53-week fiscal year, consisting of thirteen four-week periods and ending on the Sunday nearest the end of August. The first three quarters consist of three periods each, and the fourth quarter consists of four periods (five weeks in the thirteenth period in a 53-week year). The material seasonal impact in our operations is an increased level of net sales and earnings during the winter holiday season. References to 2010, 2009, and 2008 relate to the 52-week fiscal years ended August 29, 2010, August 30, 2009, and August 31, 2008, respectively.

Membership Policy

Our membership format is designed to reinforce customer loyalty and provide a continuing source of membership fee revenue. Members can utilize their memberships at any Costco warehouse location in

Item 1—Business (Continued)

any country. We have two primary types of members: Business and Gold Star (individual). Our member renewal rate currently at 88%was 89% in the U.S. and Canada, isand approximately 86% on a worldwide basis, consistent with recent years. The renewal rate is a trailing calculation that captures renewals during the period seven to eighteen months prior to the reporting date. Businesses, including individuals with a business license, retail sales license or other evidence of business existence, may become Business members. Business members generally pay an annual membership fee of approximately $50 for the primary and household membership card, with add-on membership cards available for an annual fee of $40approximately $50 (including a free household card). Many of our business members also shop at Costco for their personal needs. Individual memberships (Gold Star memberships)Star) memberships are available to individuals who do not qualify for a Business membership, for an annual fee of approximately $50, which includes a household card.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

Our membership base was made up of the following (in thousands):

 

  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

Gold Star

  22,500  21,500  20,200   25,000     22,500     21,500  

Business

  5,800  5,700  5,600   6,300     5,800     5,700  

Business, Add-on Primary

  3,300  3,400  3,400   4,000     3,300     3,400  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total primary cardholders

  31,600  30,600  29,200   35,300     31,600     30,600  

Additional cardholders

  26,400  25,400  24,300   28,700     26,400     25,400  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total cardholders

  58,000  56,000  53,500   64,000     58,000     56,000  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

TheseThe numbers for 2010 and 2009 exclude approximately 2,900 and 2,800 cardholders of Costco Mexico at the end of 2010, and 2,800 cardholders at the end of 2009 and 2008.those years.

Executive membership is available to all members, with the exception of Business Add-on members, in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and the United Kingdom for an annual fee of approximately $100. TheThis program, in the U.S. and Canada,excluding Mexico, offers additional savings and benefits on various business and consumer services, such as merchant credit-card processing, auto and home insurance, the Costco auto purchase program, and check printing services.services and a high yield savings program. The services are generally provided by third-parties and vary by country and state. In addition, Executive members qualify for a 2% annual reward (which can be redeemed at Costco warehouses), up to a maximum of approximately $500 per year, on qualified purchases made at Costco. At the end of 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008,2009, Executive members represented 36%38%, 33%36%, and 30%33%, respectively, of our primary membership base that was eligible for the program.membership. Executive members generally spend more than other members, and the percentage of our net sales attributable to these members continues to increase.

Labor

Our employee count approximated:

 

  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

Full-time employees

  82,000  79,000  75,000   92,000     82,000     79,000  

Part-time employees

  65,000  63,000  62,000   72,000     65,000     63,000  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total employees

  147,000  142,000  137,000   164,000     147,000     142,000  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

TheseThe numbers for 2010 and 2009 exclude approximately 9,000 individuals who were employed by Costco Mexico at the end of 2010, 2009, and 2008.those years. Approximately 13,20013,600 hourly employees in certain of our locations (all former Price Company locations) in five states are represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. All remaining employees are non-union. We consider our employee relations to be very good.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

Competition

Our industry is highly competitive, based on factors such as price, merchandise quality and selection, warehouse location and member service. We compete with over 800 warehouse club locations across the U.S. and Canada (Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club and BJ’s Wholesale Club), and every major metropolitan area has multiple club operations. In addition, we compete with a wide range of global, national and regional retailerswholesalers and wholesalers,retailers, including supermarkets, supercenters, general merchandise chains,supercenter stores, department and specialty chains, andstores, gasoline stations, as well as electronic commerce businesses.and internet-based retailers. Competitors such as Wal-Mart, Target, Kohl’s and AmazonAmazon.com are among our significant general merchandise retail competitors. We also compete with low-cost operators selling a single category or narrow range of merchandise, such as Lowe’s, Home Depot, Office Depot, PetSmart, Staples, Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, Best Buy and Barnes & Noble. Our international operations face similar types of competitors.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

Regulation

Certain state laws require that we apply minimum markups to our selling prices for specific goods, such as tobacco products, alcoholic beverages, and gasoline. While compliance with such laws may cause us to charge higher prices, other retailers are also typically governed by the same restrictions, and we believe that compliance with such laws currently in effect do not have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Certain states, counties, and municipalitiesjurisdictions have enacted or proposed laws and regulations that would prevent or restrict the operations or expansion plans of certain large retailers and warehouse clubs, including us, within their jurisdictions. If enacted, such laws and regulations could have a material adverse affect on our operations.

Intellectual Property

We believe that, to varying degrees, our trademarks, trade names, copyrights, proprietary processes, trade secrets, patents, trade dress and similar intellectual property add significant value to our business and are important factors in our success. Our failure to continue to develop, maintain, and protect these properties would adversely affect our business and financial results. We have invested significantly in the development and protection of our well-recognized brands, including the Costco Wholesale® series of trademarks and our private label brand, Kirkland Signature®. We believe that Kirkland Signature products are premium products offered to our members at prices that are generally lower than those for national brand products. Kirkland Signature products allow us to ensure our quality standards are met, while minimizingand that they help lower costs, and differentiatingdifferentiate our merchandise offerings from other retailers, and to generally earn higher margins. We expect thatto increase the sales penetration of our private label items will increase their share of our sales in the future. We rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection, and confidentiality and license agreements with our employees and others to protect our proprietary rights. Effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we operate.

Available Information

Our internet website is www.costco.com. We make available through the Investor Relations section of that site, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements and Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such materials with, or furnishing such documents to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following is a list of the names, ages, and positions of the executive officers of the Company. All executive officers have 25 or more years of service with the Company.

Name

  

Position With Company

  Executive
Officer
Since
   Age 

James D. Sinegal

  Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sinegal is a co-founder of the Company and has been a director since its inception. In February 2010, Mr. Sinegal relinquished his role as President of the Company, which he had held since the Company’s inception.   1983     74  

Jeffrey H. Brotman

  Chairman of the Board. Mr. Brotman is a co-founder of the Company and has been a director since its inception.   1983     68  

W. Craig Jelinek

  President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Jelinek has been President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since February 2010, when he also joined the Board of Directors. Prior to that date, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Merchandising since 2004.   1995     58  

Richard A. Galanti

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Galanti has been a director of the Company since January 1995.   1993     54  

Paul G. Moulton

  Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer. He was Executive Vice President, Real Estate Development until March 2010.   2001     59  

Joseph P. Portera

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Eastern and Canadian Divisions.   1994     58  

Douglas W. Schutt

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Merchandising. He was Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Northern and Midwest Division from 2004 to March 2010.   2004     51  

John D. McKay

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Northern and Midwest Division. He was Senior Vice President, General Manager, Northwest Region from 2000 to March 2010.   2010     53  

Thomas K. Walker

  Executive Vice President, Construction, Distribution and Traffic.   2004     70  

Dennis R. Zook

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Southwest and Mexico Divisions.   1993     61  

The Company has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers pursuant to section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Copies of the code are available free of charge by writing to Secretary, Costco Wholesale Corporation, 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, WA 98027. If the Company makes any amendments to this code (other than technical, administrative, or non-substantive amendments) or grants any waivers, including implicit waivers, from this code to the CEO, chief financial officer or controller, we will disclose (on our website or in a Form 8-K report filed with the SEC) the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date, and to whom it applies.

Item 1—Business (Continued)

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following is a list of the names, ages, and positions of the executive officers of the Company. All executive officers have 25 or more years of service with the Company, with the exception of Mr. Murphy who has 24 years of service.

Name

  

Position With Company

  Executive
Officer
Since
   Age 

James D. Sinegal

  Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sinegal is a co-founder of the Company and has been a director since its inception. In February 2010, Mr. Sinegal relinquished his role as President of the Company, which he had held since the Company’s inception.   1983     75  

Jeffrey H. Brotman

  Chairman of the Board. Mr. Brotman is a co-founder of the Company and has been a director since its inception.   1983     69  

W. Craig Jelinek

  President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Jelinek has been President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since February 2010, when he also joined the Board of Directors. Prior to that date, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Merchandising since 2004.   1995     59  

Richard A. Galanti

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Galanti has been a director of the Company since January 1995.   1993     55  

John D. McKay

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Northern and Midwest Division. Mr. McKay was Senior Vice President, General Manager, Northwest Region from 2000 to March 2010.   2010     54  

Paul G. Moulton

  Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Moulton was Executive Vice President, Real Estate Development until March 2010.   2001     60  

James P. Murphy

  Executive Vice President, International Division. Mr. Murphy was Senior Vice President, International Division, from September 2004 to October 2010.   2011     58  

Joseph P. Portera

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Eastern and Canadian Divisions.   1994     59  

Douglas W. Schutt

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Merchandising. Mr. Schutt was Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Northern and Midwest Division from 2004 to March 2010.   2004     52  

Thomas K. Walker

  Executive Vice President, Construction, Distribution and Traffic.   2004     71  

Dennis R. Zook

  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Southwest and Mexico Divisions.   1993     62  

Item 1A—Risk Factors

The risks described below could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These risks are not the only risks that we face. Our business operations could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and from results or events predictedalso be affected by our forward-looking statements. Those statements may relate to such matters as sales growth, increases in comparable store sales, cannibalization of existing locations by new openings, price changes, earnings performance, earnings per share, stock-based compensation expense, warehouse openings and closures, the effect of adopting certain accounting standards, future financial reporting, financing, margins, return on invested capital, strategic direction, expense control, membership renewal rates, shopping frequency, litigation impact and the demand for our products and services. You should read these risk factors in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of this Report and our consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8 of this Report. There may be otheradditional factors that we cannot anticipate orapply to all companies operating in the United States and globally, as well as other risks that are not described in this report, generally becausepresently known to us or that we do not presently perceive themcurrently consider to be material, that could cause results to differ materially from our expectations or statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update these forward-looking statements. You are advised to review any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our periodic filings with the SEC.immaterial.

We face strong competition from other retailers and warehouse club operators, which could negatively affect our financial performance.

The retail business is highly competitive. We compete for members, employees, sites, products and services and in other important respects with many other local, regional and national retailers, both in the United States and in foreign countries. We compete with other warehouse club operators, discounta wide range of global, national and regional wholesalers and retailers, including supermarkets, supercenter stores, retail and wholesale grocers, department drug, variety and specialty stores, gasoline stations, and general merchandise wholesalers and distributors, as well as internet-based retailers, wholesalers and catalog businesses.retailers. Such retailers and warehouse club operators compete in a variety of ways, including merchandise pricing, selection and availability, services, location, convenience, and store hours, and price.hours. Our inability to respond effectively to competitive pressures and changes in the retail markets could negatively affect our financial performance. Some competitors may have greater financial resources, better access to merchandise, and greater market penetration than we do.

General economic factors, domestically and internationally, may adversely affect our financial performance.

Higher interest rates, energy costs, inflation, levels of unemployment, healthcare costs, consumer debt levels, unsettled financial markets, weaknesses in housing and real estate markets, reduced consumer confidence, changes related to government fiscal and tax policies and other economic factors could adversely affect demand for our products and services or require a change in the mix of products we sell. Prices of certain commodity products, including gasoline and other food products, are historically volatile and are subject to fluctuations arising from changes in domestic and international supply and demand, labor costs, competition, market speculation, government regulations and periodic delays in delivery. Rapid and significant changes in commodity prices may affect our sales and profit margins. These factors can also increase our merchandise costs and/or selling, general and administrative expenses, and otherwise adversely affect our operations and financial results. General economic conditions can also be affected by the outbreak of war, acts of terrorism, or other significant national or international events.

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

Our growth strategy includes expanding our business, both in existing markets and in new markets.

Our future growth is dependent, in part, on our ability to acquire property, and build or lease new warehouses. We compete with other retailers and businesses for suitable locations. Local land use and other regulations restricting the construction and operation of our warehouses, as well as local community actions opposed to the location of our warehouses at specific sites and the adoption of local laws restricting our operations and environmental regulations may impact our ability to find suitable locations, and increase the cost of constructing, leasing and operating our warehouses. We also may have difficulty negotiating leases or real estate purchase agreements on acceptable terms. Failure to manage these and other similar factors effectively will affect our ability to timely build or lease new warehouses, which may have a material adverse affect on our future growth and profitability.

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

We seek to expand our business in existing markets in order to attain a greater overall market share. Because our warehouses typically draw members from their local areas, a new warehouse may draw members away from our existing warehouses and adversely affect comparable warehouse sales performance and member traffic at those existing warehouses.

We also intend to open warehouses in new markets. The risks associated with entering a new market include difficulties in attracting members due to a lack of familiarity with us, attracting members of other wholesale club operators currently operating in the new market, our lack of familiarity with local member preferences, and seasonal differences in the market. In addition, entry into new markets may bring us into competition with new competitors or with existing competitors with a large, established market presence. In new markets, we cannot ensure that our new warehouses will be profitably deployed; as a result, our future profitability may be delayed or otherwise materially adversely affected.

We are highly dependent on the financial performance of our United States and Canada operations.

Our financial and operational performance is highly dependent on our United States and Canada operations, which comprised 92%89% and 83% of consolidated net sales in 2010 and 93% in 2009, and 89% of operating income in 2010 and 92% in 2009.2011, respectively. Within the United States, we are highly dependent on our California operations, which comprised 26% and 27%24% of consolidated net sales in 2010 and 2009, respectively.2011. Our California market, in general, has a larger percentage of higher volume warehouses as compared to our other markets. Any substantial slowing or sustained decline in these operations could materially adversely affect our business and financial results. Declines in financial performance of our United States operations, particularly in California, and our Canada operations could arise from, among other things: failing to meet targets for warehouse openings; declines in actual or estimated comparable warehouse sales growth rates and expectations; negative trends in operating expenses, including increased labor, healthcare and energy costs; cannibalizing existing locations with new warehouses; shifts in sales mix toward lower gross margin products; changes or uncertainties in economic conditions in our markets;markets, including higher levels of unemployment and depressed home values; and failing to consistently to provide high quality products and innovative new products to retain our existing member base and attract new members.

We depend on vendors to supply us with quality merchandise at the right prices in a timely manner.

We depend heavily on our ability to purchase merchandise in sufficient quantities at competitive prices. We have no assurances of continued supply, pricing or access to new products, and any vendor could at any time change the terms upon which it sells to us or discontinue selling to us. Member demands may lead to out-of-stock positions of our merchandise, leading to loss of sales and profits.

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

We purchase our merchandise from numerous domestic and foreign manufacturers and importers and have thousands of vendor relationships. Our inability to acquire suitable merchandise on acceptable terms or the loss of key vendors could negatively affect us. We may not be able to develop relationships with new vendors, and products from alternative sources, if any, may be of a lesser quality or more expensive than those from existing vendors. Because of our efforts to adhere to high quality standards for which available supply may be limited, particularly for certain food items, the large volume we demand may not be consistently available.

Our suppliers are subject to risks, including labor disputes, union organizing activities, financial liquidity, inclement weather, natural disasters, supply constraints, and general economic and political conditions, that could limit their ability to timely provide us with acceptable merchandise. For these or other reasons, one or more of our suppliers might not adhere to our quality control, legal or regulatory standards.stan

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

dards. These deficiencies may delay or preclude delivery of merchandise to us and might not be identified before we sell such merchandise to our members. This failure could lead to litigation and recalls, which could damage our reputation and our brands, increase our costs, and otherwise hurt our business.

In addition, the United States’ foreign trade policies, tariffs and other impositions on imported goods, security and safety regulations, trade sanctions imposed on certain countries, the limitation on the importation of certain types of goods or of goods containing certain materials from other countries and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control and could adversely impact our sourcing of goods.

We depend onDisruptions in our depot operations to effectivelycould adversely affect sales and efficiently supply product to our warehouses.member satisfaction.

We depend on the orderly operation of the receiving and distribution process, primarily through our depots. Although we believe that our receiving and distribution process is efficient, unforeseen disruptions in operations due to fires, hurricanes, earthquakes or other catastrophic events, labor shortages and disagreements or shipping problems, may result in delays in the delivery of merchandise to our warehouses, which could adversely affect sales and the satisfaction of our members.

We may not timely identify or effectively respond to consumer trends, which could negatively affect our relationship with our members, the demand for our products and services, and our market share.

It is difficult to consistently and successfully predict the products and services our members will demand. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to identify and respond to trends in demographics and consumer preferences. Failure to timely identify or effectively respond to changing consumer tastes, preferences (including those relating to sustainability of product sources) and spending patterns could negatively affect our relationship with our members, the demand for our products and services and our market share. If we are not successful at predicting our sales trends and adjusting our purchases accordingly, we may have excess inventory, which could result in additional markdowns and reduce our operating performance. This could have an adverse effect on margins and operating income.

Our failure to maintain positive membership loyalty and brand recognition could adversely affect our financial results.

Membership loyalty is essential to our business model. Damage to our brands or reputation may negatively impact comparable warehouse sales, lower employee morale and productivity, diminish member trust, and reduce member renewal rates and, accordingly, membership fee revenues, resulting in a reduction in shareholder value.

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

In addition, we sell many products under our owned and exclusive Kirkland Signature brand. Maintaining consistent product quality, competitive pricing, and availability of our Kirkland Signature products for our customers is essential to developing and maintaining customer loyalty. These products also generally carry higher margins than national brand products and represent a growing portion of our overall sales. If the Kirkland Signature brand experiences a loss of consumer acceptance or confidence, our sales and gross margin results could be adversely affected.

Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results.

Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, including, but not limited to, revenue recognition, sales returns reserves, impairment of long-lived assets and warehouse closing costs, inventories, vendor rebates and other consideration, self-insurance liabilities, income taxes, unclaimed property laws and litigation, and other contingent liabilities are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by our management. Changes

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by our management could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance. Provisions for losses related to self-insured risks are generally based upon independent actuarially determined estimates. The assumptions underlying the ultimate costs of existing claim losses can be highly unpredictable, which can affect the liability recorded for such claims. For example, variability in inflation rates of health care costs inherent in these claims can affect the amounts realized. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 were enacted. This legislation expands health care coverage to many uninsured individuals and expands coverage to those already insured. We expect our healthcare costs to increase, but not materially, as a result of this legislation. Similarly, changes in legal trends and interpretations, as well as a change in the nature and method of how claims are settled can impact ultimate costs. Although our estimates of liabilities incurred do not anticipate significant changes in historical trends for these variables, any changes could have a considerable effect upon future claim costs and currently recorded liabilities and could materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

ChangesUnfavorable changes in Tax Ratestax rates could adversely affect our operations, financial conditions or cash flows.

We compute our income tax provision based on enacted tax rates in the countries in which we operate. As the tax rates vary among countries, a change in earnings attributable to the various jurisdictions in which we operate could result in an unfavorable change in our overall tax provision. Additionally, any change in the enacted tax rates, any adverse outcome in connection with any income tax audits in any jurisdiction, including transfer pricing disputes, or any change in the pronouncements relating to accounting for income taxes may have a material adverse affect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Failure of our internal control over financial reporting could make our financial results inaccurate or untimely.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes: maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of the financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that our receipts and expenditures of our assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to and cannot provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud.

We rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage our business. Disruptions in both our primary and back-up systems could harm our business.

Although we believe that we have independent, redundant, and primary and secondary computer systems, given the number of individual transactions we have each year it is important that we maintain

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

 

uninterrupted operation of our business-critical computer systems. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, internal or external security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes, and errors by our employees. If our computer systems and our back-up systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make significant investments to fix or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim. Any material interruption in our computer systems may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

We expect to make significant technology investments in the coming years, which are key to managing our business. We must monitor and choose the right investments and implement them at the right pace. Excessive technological change could impact the effectiveness of adoption, and could make it more difficult for us to realize benefits from the technology. Targeting the wrong opportunities, failing to make the best investments or making an investment commitment significantly above or below our needs may result in the loss of our competitive position or underlying financial data. Additionally, the costs, potential problems, and interruptions associated with implementing technology initiatives could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations in the short term. These initiatives might not provide the anticipated benefits or provide them in a delayed or more costly manner.

Our international operations subject us to risks associated with the legislative, judicial, accounting, regulatory, political and economic factors specific to the countries or regions in which we operate, which could adversely affect our financial performance.

OurDuring 2011, our international operations, are growing.including Canada, generated 27% of our consolidated net sales. We plan to continue expanding our international operations. As a result of these expansion activities in countries outside the United States, we expect that our international operations could account for a larger portion of our net sales in future years. Future operating results internationally could be negatively affected by a variety of factors, many beyond our control and similar to those we face in the United States. These factors include political conditions, economic conditions, regulatory constraints, currency regulations and exchange rates, and other matters in any of the countries or regions in which we operate, now or in the future. Other factors that may impact international operations include foreign trade, monetary and fiscal policies both of the United States and of other countries, laws and regulations of foreign governments and the United States (such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), agencies and similar organizations, and risks associated with having major facilities located in countries which have been historically less stable than the United States. Risks inherent in international operations also include, among others, the costs and difficulties of managing international operations, adverse tax consequences and greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights. Additionally, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations may have an adverse impact on our future costs or on future cash flows from our international operations.

Market expectations for our financial performance is high.

We believe that the price of our stock generally reflects high market expectations for our future operating results. Any failure to meet or delay in meeting these expectations, including our comparable warehouse sales growth rates, margins, earnings and earnings per share or new warehouse openings, could cause the market price of our stock to decline, as could changes in our dividend or stock repurchase policies.

We rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage our business. Disruptions in both our primary and back-up systems could harm our business.Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

Although we believe that we have independent, redundant, and primary and secondary computer systems, given the number of individual transactions we have each year, it is important that we maintain uninterrupted operation of our business-critical computer systems. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, internal or external security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes, and errors by our employees. If our computer systems and our back-up systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make significant investments to fix or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim. Any material interruption in our computer systems may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. The costs, potential problems, and interruptions associated with implementing technology initiatives could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations in the short term. These initiatives might not provide the anticipated benefits or provide them in a delayed or more costly manner.

Natural disasters or other catastrophic events could unfavorably affect our financial performance.

Natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes, particularly in California or in Washington state, where our centralized operating systems and administrative personnel are located, could unfavorably affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our properties, the temporary closure of one or more warehouses or depots, the temporary

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

lack of an adequate work force in a market, the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, the temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, delays in the delivery of goods to our depots or warehouses within a country in which we operate and the temporary reduction in the availability of products in our warehouses. Public health issues, such as a potential H1N1 flu pandemic (swine flu), pandemic, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on consumer spending and confidence levels. We may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers.

We are subject to a wide variety of federal, state, regional, local and international laws and regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, and other environmental matters.

Any failure to comply with these laws could result in costs to satisfy environmental compliance, remediation or compensatory requirements, or the imposition of severe penalties or restrictions on operations by governmental agencies or courts that could adversely affect our operations.

Factors associated with climate change could adversely affect our business.

We use natural gas, diesel fuel, gasoline, and electricity in our distribution and salewarehouse operations. Increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions may result in increased compliance costs and legislation or regulation affecting energy inputs could materially affect our profitability. In addition, climate change could affect our ability to procure needed commodities at costs and in quantities we currently experience. We also sell a substantial amount of gasoline, the demand for which could be impacted by concerns about climate change and which also could face increased regulation. Climate change may be associated with extreme weather conditions, such as more intense hurricanes, thunderstorms, tornados and snow or ice storms, as well as rising sea levels. Extreme weather conditions increase our costs, and damage resulting from extreme weather may not be fully insured.

We are subject to a wide variety of federal, state, regional, local and international laws and regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, and other environmental matters.

Any failure to comply with these laws could result in costs to satisfy environmental compliance, remediation or compensatory requirements, or the imposition of severe penalties or restrictions on operations by governmental agencies or courts that could adversely affect our operations.

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings and audits, and while we cannot predict the outcomes of such proceedings and other contingencies with certainty, some of these outcomes may unfavorably affect our operations or increase our costs.

We are or may become involved in a number of legal proceedings and audits, including grand jury investigations, other government investigations, consumer, employment, tort and other litigation (see discussion of Legal Proceedings in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report). We cannot predict with certainty the outcomes of these legal proceedings and other contingencies, including environmental remediation and other proceedings commenced by governmental authorities. The outcome of some of these legal proceedings and other contingencies could require us to take or refrain from taking actions which could unfavorably affect our operations or could require us to pay substantial amounts of money. Additionally, defending against these lawsuits and

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

proceedings may involve significant expense and diversion of management’s attention and resources. Our business requires compliance with a great variety of laws and regulations. Failure to achieve compliance could subject us to lawsuits and other proceedings, and lead to damage awards, fines and penalties.

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

We are subject to the risks of selling unsafe products.

If our merchandise offerings, including food and prepared food products for human consumption, drugs and childrens’ products, do not meet or are perceived not to meet applicable safely standards or our members’ expectations regarding safety, we could experience lost sales, increased costs and be exposed to legal and reputational risk. The sale of these items involves the risk of injury to our members. Such injuries may result from tampering by unauthorized third parties, product contamination or spoilage, including the presence of foreign objects, substances, chemicals, other agents, or residues introduced during the growing, manufacturing, storage, handling and transportation phases. Our vendors are generally contractually required to comply with applicable product safety laws, and we are dependent on them to ensure that the products we buy comply with all safety standards. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and work to comply in all material respects with applicable laws and regulations, we cannot be sure that consumption of our products will not cause a health-related illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims, lawsuits, or government investigations relating to such matters, resulting in costly product recalls and other liabilities. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential members and our corporate and brand image and these effects could be long term.

Our success depends on the continued contributions of management and on our ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified employees.

Our success depends to a significant degree on the continued contributions of members of our senior management and other key operations, merchandising and administrative personnel, and the loss of any such person(s) could have a material adverse effect.effect on our business. Other than an annual agreement with our CEO, Mr. Sinegal, we have no employment agreements with our officers. We must attract, train and retain a large and growing number of highly qualified employees, while controlling related labor costs.costs and maintaining our core values. Our ability to control labor costs is subject to numerous external factors, including prevailing wage rates and healthcare and other insurance costs. We compete with other retail and non-retail businesses for these employees and invest significant resources in training and motivating them. There is no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified employees in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company does not maintain key man insurance.

If we do not maintain the privacy and security of member-related and business information, we could damage our reputation with members, incur substantial additional costs and become subject to litigation.

We receive, retain, and transmit certain personal information about our members. In addition, our online operations at www.costco.com and www.costco.ca depend upon the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks, including information permitting cashless payments. A compromise of our security systems or those of other business partners that results in our members’ personal information being obtained by unauthorized persons could adversely affect our reputation with our members and others, as well as our operations, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity,liquid-

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

ity, and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties. In addition, a security breach could require that we expend significant additional resources related to the security of information systems and could result in a disruption of our operations, particularly our online sales operations.

Additionally, the use of individually identifiable data by our business and our business associates is regulated at the international, federal and state levels. Privacy and information security laws and regulations change, and compliance with them may result in cost increases due to necessary systems

Item 1A—Risk Factors (Continued)

changes and the development of new administrative processes. If we or those with whom we share information fail to comply with these laws and regulations or experience a data security breach, our reputation could be damaged, possibly resulting in lost future business, and we could be subjected to additional legal risk as a result of non-compliance.

Our security measures may be undermined due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our data systems and misappropriate business and personal information. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may not immediately produce signs of intrusion, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, and potentially have an adverse effect on our business.

Item 1B—Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2—Properties

Warehouse Properties

At August 29, 2010,28, 2011, we operated 540592 membership warehouses:

NUMBER OF WAREHOUSES

 

  Own Land
and Building
  Lease  Land
and/or
Building(1)
  Total  Own Land
and Building
   Lease  Land
and/or
Building(1)
   Total 

United States and Puerto Rico

  329  87  416   339     90     429  

Canada

  70  9  79   72     10     82  

Mexico

   31     1     32  

United Kingdom

  19  3  22   19     3     22  

Japan

  1  8  9   1     8     9  

Taiwan

   0     8     8  

Korea

  3  4  7   3     4     7  

Taiwan

    6  6

Australia

  1    1   2     1     3  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  423  117  540   467     125     592  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

7785 of the 117125 leases are land-leases only, where Costco owns the building.

The following schedule shows warehouse openings (net of closings) by region for the past five fiscal years and expected warehouse openings (net of closings) through December 31, 2010:2011:

 

Openings by Fiscal Year

  United States  Canada  Other
International
  Total  Total Warehouses
in Operation
  United States   Canada   Other
International
 Total   Total Warehouses
in Operation
 

2006 and prior

  358  68  32  458  458

2007

  25  3  2  30  488

2007 and prior

   383     71     34    488     488  

2008

  15  4  5  24  512   15     4     5    24     512  

2009

  8  2  5  15  527   8     2     5    15     527  

2010

  10  2  1  13  540   10     2     1    13     540  

2011 (expected through 12/31/10)

  9  1    10  550

2011

   13     3     36(2)   52     592  

2012 (expected through 12/31/11)

   4          2    6     598  
                

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

Total

  425  80  45  550     433     82     83    598    
                

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

The 32 warehouses operated by Costco Mexico, under our oversight, at the end of 2010 are not included in the above tables.

(2)

This number includes the 32 Mexico warehouses in operation at the beginning of 2011, when we began consolidating Mexico. Mexico opened 30 warehouses in 2007 and prior, one in 2008 and one in 2009.

At the end of 2010,2011, our warehouses contained approximately 77.384.4 million square feet of operating floor space: 60.262.1 million in the United States, 10.811.2 million in Canada and 6.311.1 million in other international locations, excludingincluding Mexico.

Our executive offices are located in Issaquah, Washington and occupy approximately 581,000 square feet. We operated eight regional offices in the United States, two regional offices in Canada and fivesix regional offices internationally at the end of 2010,2011, containing approximately 334,000422,000 square feet. Additionally, we operateoperated regional cross-docking facilities (depots) for the consolidation and distribution of most shipments to the warehouses, and various processing, packaging, and other facilities to support ancillary and other businesses. At the end of 2010,2011, we operated 12 depots in the United States, four in Canada and threefour internationally, excluding Mexico, consisting of approximately 7.68.3 million square feet.

Item 3—Legal Proceedings

See discussion of Legal Proceedings in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

Item 4—Removed and Reserved

PART II

Item 5—Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information and Dividend Policy

Our common stock is traded on the National Market tier of NASDAQ under the symbol “COST.” On October 1, 2010,September 30, 2011, we had 8,2868,198 stockholders of record.

The following table shows the quarterly high and low closing sale prices as reported by NASDAQ for each quarter during the last two fiscal years and the quarterly cash dividend declared per share of our common stock during the periods indicated.

 

  Price Range  Cash
Dividends
Declared
  Price Range   Cash
Dividends
Declared
 
  High  Low    High   Low   

2011:

      

Fourth Quarter

  $83.86    $70.39    $0.240  

Third Quarter

   81.46     69.76     0.240  

Second Quarter

   75.04     66.90     0.205  

First Quarter

   67.02     56.07     0.205  

2010:

            

Fourth Quarter

  $59.16  $53.61  $0.205   59.16     53.61     0.205  

Third Quarter

   61.74   57.31   0.205   61.74     57.31     0.205  

Second Quarter

   60.89   57.07   0.180   60.89     57.07     0.180  

First Quarter

   61.12   50.65   0.180   61.12     50.65     0.180  

2009:

      

Fourth Quarter

   51.77   44.54   0.180

Third Quarter

   48.91   38.44   0.180

Second Quarter

   55.58   42.76   0.160

First Quarter

   70.37   44.99   0.160

Payment of future dividends is subject to declaration by the Board of Directors. Factors considered in determining the size of the dividends are our profitability and expected capital needs. Subject to these qualifications, we presently expect to continue to pay dividends on a quarterly basis.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (dollars in millions, except per share data)

The following table sets forth information on our common stock repurchase program activity for the 16-week fourth quarter of fiscal 2010:2011:

 

Period(1)

  Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Share
  Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs(2)
  Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet be
Purchased Under
the Programs(2)

May 10, 2010—June 6, 2010

  1,800,000  $57.57  1,800,000  $1,769

June 7, 2010—July 4, 2010

  2,025,000   56.82  2,025,000  $1,654

July 5, 2010—August 1, 2010

  1,717,700   55.64  1,717,700  $1,559

August 2, 2010—August 29, 2010

  2,225,000   55.97  2,225,000  $1,434
            

Total fourth quarter

  7,767,700  $56.49  7,767,700  
            

Period(1)

  Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price Paid
per Share
   Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced

Programs(2)
   Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet be
Purchased Under
the Programs(2)
 

May 9, 2011—June 5, 2011

   70,000    $79.16     70,000    $3,994  

June 6, 2011—July 3, 2011

   1,052,000     79.56     1,052,000    $3,911  

July 4, 2011—July 31, 2011

   917,000     80.64     917,000    $3,837  

August 1, 2011—August 28, 2011

   1,756,000     74.85     1,756,000    $3,706  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total fourth quarter

   3,795,000    $77.63     3,795,000    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

(1)

Monthly information is presented by reference to our fiscal periods during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.2011.

 

(2)

Our stock repurchase program is conducted under authorizations made bya $4,000 authorization of our Board of Directors: $1,000 was authorizedDirectors approved in November 2007,April 2011, which expires in November 2010; and $1,000 was authorized in July 2008, which expires in July 2011.April 2015.

Equity Compensation Plans

Information related to our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year.

Item 6—Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our consolidated financial condition, operating results, and key operating metrics for the dates and periods indicated.metrics. This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in Item 7 and our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

At the beginning of fiscal 2011, we began consolidating our 50% owned Mexico joint venture (Mexico) on a prospective basis due to the adoption of a new accounting standard. Mexico’s results for the prior years were accounted for under the equity method and our 50% share was included in “interest income and other” in the consolidated statements of income in Item 8. In the current year, the financial position and results of Mexico’s operations are fully consolidated and the joint venture partner’s 50% share is included in “net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in the consolidated statements of income in Item 8 of this Report. The initial consolidation of Mexico increased total assets, liabilities, and revenue by approximately 3%, with no impact on net income or net income per common share attributable to Costco. See discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)

 

As of and for the year ended(1) Aug. 29, 2010
(52 weeks)
 Aug. 30, 2009
(52 weeks)
 Aug. 31, 2008
(52 weeks)
 Sept. 2, 2007
(52 weeks)
 Sept. 3, 2006
(53 weeks)
  Aug. 28, 2011
(52 weeks)
 Aug. 29, 2010
(52 weeks)
 Aug. 30, 2009
(52 weeks)
 Aug. 31, 2008
(52 weeks)
 Sept. 2, 2007
(52 weeks)
 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          

Net sales

 $76,255   $69,889   $70,977   $63,088   $58,963   $87,048   $76,255   $69,889   $70,977   $63,088  

Merchandise costs

  67,995    62,335    63,503    56,450    52,745    77,739    67,995    62,335    63,503    56,450  
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross Margin

  8,260    7,554   ��7,474    6,638    6,218  

Gross margin

  9,309    8,260    7,554    7,474    6,638  

Membership fees

  1,691    1,533    1,506    1,313    1,188    1,867    1,691    1,533    1,506    1,313  

Operating income

  2,077    1,777    1,969    1,609    1,626    2,439    2,077    1,777    1,969    1,609  

Net income attributable to Costco

  1,303    1,086    1,283    1,083    1,103    1,462    1,303    1,086    1,283    1,083  

Net income per diluted common share attributable to Costco

  2.92    2.47    2.89    2.37    2.30    3.30    2.92    2.47    2.89    2.37  

Dividends per share

 $0.77   $0.68   $0.61   $0.55   $0.49   $0.89   $0.77   $0.68   $0.61   $0.55  

Increase (decrease) in comparable warehouse sales(2)(1)

          

United States

  4  (2%)   6  5  7  7  4  (2%)   6  5

International

  19  (8%)   15  9  11  16  19  (8%)   15  9
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  7  (4%)   8  6  8  10  7  (4%)   8  6
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Increase in International comparable warehouse sales in local currency

  8  7  6  5  7

Increase in international comparable warehouse sales in local currency

  10  8  7  6  5

BALANCE SHEET DATA

          

Net property and equipment

 $11,314   $10,900   $10,355   $9,520   $8,564   $12,432   $11,314   $10,900   $10,355   $9,520  

Total assets

  23,815    21,979    20,682    19,607    17,495    26,761    23,815    21,979    20,682    19,607  

Short-term borrowings

  26    16    134    54    41        26    16    134    54  

Current portion of long-term debt

      80    6    60    309    900        80    6    60  

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

  2,141    2,130    2,206    2,108    215    1,253    2,141    2,130    2,206    2,108  

Costco stockholders’ equity

 $10,829   $10,024   $9,194   $8,626   $9,147   $12,002   $10,829   $10,024   $9,194   $8,626  

WAREHOUSE INFORMATION

          

Warehouses in Operation(3)(2)

          

Beginning of year(2)

  527    512    488    458    433    572    527    512    488    458  

Opened(4)(3)

  14    19    34    30    28    24    14    19    34    30  

Closed(4)(3)

  (1  (4  (10      (3  (4  (1  (4  (10    
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

End of Year

  540    527    512    488    458  

End of year

  592    540    527    512    488  
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to conform to the presentation adopted in the current year. See further information in Note 1 of Item 8 of this Report.

(2)

Includes net sales at warehouses open greater than one year, including relocated facilities.

 

(3)(2)

Excludes, in 2010 and in prior years presented, warehouses operated in Mexico through a 50% owned joint venture. Mexico opened 30 of these warehouses in 2007 and prior, one in 2008, and one in 2009. The 2011 beginning-of-year figure includes the 32 Mexico warehouses consolidated at the beginning of the fiscal year.

 

(4)(3)

Includes warehouse relocations and the closure in July 2009 of two Costco Home locations.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)

OVERVIEW

Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to August 31. References to 2010, 2009, and 2008 relate to the 52-week years ended August 29, 2010, August 30, 2009, and August 31, 2008, respectively. Certain percentages presented are calculated using actual results prior to rounding. Unless otherwise noted, references to net income relate to net income attributable to Costco.

Key items for 2010 included:

Net sales increased 9.1% from the prior year to $76,255, driven by a 7% increase in comparable sales (sales in warehouses open for at least one year, including relocated warehouses) and sales at the 13 new warehouses (14 opened and one closed due to relocation) in 2010. Net sales were positively impacted by the year-over-year increase in the price of gasoline and by the strengthening of certain foreign currency exchange rates;

Membership fees increased 10.3% to $1,691; however, excluding the $27 charge recorded in 2009 related to a litigation settlement, membership fees increased 8.4%, due to new membership sign-ups and increased penetration of the higher-fee Executive Membership program;

Gross margin (net sales less merchandise costs) as a percentage of net sales increased two basis points over the prior year;

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses as a percentage of net sales improved 10 basis points over the prior year;

Net income increased 20% to $1,303, or $2.92 per diluted share, compared to $1,086, or $2.47 per diluted share, in 2009;

The Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend from $0.18 to $0.205 per share;

We repurchased 9,943,000 shares of our common stock, at an average cost of $57.14 per share, totaling approximately $568;

The Board of Directors appointed W. Craig Jelinek as Costco’s President and Chief Operating Officer and elected him a director. Jim Sinegal will continue as Chief Executive Officer; and

In May 2010, we announced the retirement of Dick DiCerchio, as our Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, effective June 4, 2010.

We believe that the most important driver of increasing our profitability is sales growth, particularly comparable sales growth.growth (sales in warehouses open for at least one year). Comparable sales growth is achieved through increasing the frequency with which our members shop and the amounts they spend on each visit. Sales comparisons can also be particularly influenced by two factors that are beyond our control, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates (with respect to the consolidation of the results of our international operations) and changes in the cost of gasoline and associated competitive conditions (primarily impacting domestic operations). The higher our comparable sales not associated with currency fluctuations the more we can leverage certain of our selling, general and administrative expenses, reducing them as a percentage of sales and enhancing profitability. Generating comparable sales growth is foremost a question of making available to our members the right merchandise at the right prices, a skill that we believe we have repeatedly demonstrated over the long term. Another substantial factor in sales growth is the health of the economies in which we do business, especially the United States. Adverse economic conditions negatively impacted spending by our customers during 2009 and 2010, and that negative impact may continue. Sales growth and our gross margin are also impacted by our competition, which is vigorous and widespread, including other warehouse clubs, discount,a wide range of global, national and regional wholesalers and retailers, including supermarkets, supercenter stores, department drug, variety and

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

specialty stores, gasoline stations, and supermarkets, as well as internetinternet-based retailers. While we cannot control or reliably predict general economic health or changes in competition, we believe that we have been successful historically in adapting our business to these changes, such as through adjustments to our pricing and to our merchandise mix, including increasing the penetration of our private label items. Our philosophy is not to focus in the short term on maximizing prices that our members can be charged but to maintain what we believe is a perception among our members of our “pricing authority”—consistently providing the most competitive values. This may cause us, for example, to absorb increases in merchandise costs at certain times rather than immediately passing them along to our members, negatively impacting gross margin.

We also achieve sales growth by opening new warehouses and relocating existing warehouses to larger and better-located facilities. As our warehouse base grows, and available and desirable potential sites become more difficult to secure, and square footage growth becomes a comparatively less substantial component of growth, butgrowth. However, the negative aspects of such growth, (includingincluding lower initial operating profitability relative to existing warehouses and cannibalization of sales at existing warehousewarehouses when openings occur in existing markets)markets, are ameliorated. Our rate of square footage growth is higher in foreign markets, due to the smaller base in those markets, and we expect that to continue.

Our financial performance also depends heavily on our ability to control costs. While we believe that we have achieved successes in this area historically, some significant costs are partially outside our control, most particularly health care and utility expenses. With respect to expenses relating to the compensation of our employees, our philosophy is not to seek to minimize the wages and benefits that they earn. Rather, we believe that achieving our longer-term objectives of reducing employee turnover and enhancing employee satisfaction requires maintaining compensation levels that are better than the industry average for much of our workforce. This may cause us, for example, to absorb costs that other employers might seek to pass through to their workforces. Because our business is operated on very low margins, modest changes in various items in the income statement, particularly gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses, can have substantial impacts on net income.

Key items for 2011 included:

Net sales increased 14.2% to $87,048, driven by a 10% increase in comparable sales and sales at the 20 net new warehouses opened in fiscal 2011. Net sales were favorably impacted by increases in the price of gasoline and by foreign currencies strengthening against the U.S. dollar;

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

Membership fees increased 10.4% to $1,867, primarily due to the increased penetration of the higher-fee Executive Membership program and new membership sign-ups;

Gross margin (net sales less merchandise costs) as a percentage of net sales decreased 14 basis points and included a pre-tax last in, first out (LIFO) inventory charge of $87. There was no LIFO charge in 2010;

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 31 basis points;

Net income attributable to Costco increased 12.2% to $1,462, or $3.30 per diluted share compared to $1,303, or $2.92 per diluted share in 2010. The previously mentioned LIFO charge negatively impacted diluted earnings per share by $0.12;

The Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend from $0.205 to $0.24 per share;

We repurchased 8,939,000 shares of our common stock, at an average cost of $71.74 per share, totaling approximately $641;

The Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional $4,000 of our common stock under a repurchase program expiring in April 2015; and

In August 2011, we announced the retirement of Jim Sinegal as our Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2012. The Board of Directors elected Craig Jelinek, currently President and Chief Operating Officer, as President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2012. Mr. Sinegal will remain with Costco in an advisory role until February 2013. In addition, he will continue to serve on the Board of Directors.

Certain percentages presented are calculated using actual results prior to rounding. Unless otherwise noted, references to net income relate to net income attributable to Costco.

Only the 2011 data in the accompanying tables includes Mexico.

Results of Operations

Net Sales

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Net sales

  $76,255   $69,889   $70,977    $87,048   $76,255   $69,889  

Net sales increase (decrease)

   9.1  (1.5%)   12.5   14.2  9.1  (1.5%) 

Increase (decrease) in comparable sales

   7  (4%)   8   10  7  (4%) 

Warehouse openings, net

   13    15    24     20    13    15  

20102011 vs. 20092010

Net Sales

Net sales increased 9.1%$10,793 or 14.2% during 20102011 compared to 2009. The $6,3662010. Excluding sales of Mexico, the increase would have been 11%. This increase was comprised of a $4,871primarily attributable to an increase in comparable warehouse sales, and the remainder primarily from sales at the 20 net new warehouses opened during 20102011 (24 opened, and 2009.

Foreign currencies, particularly in Canada, Korea,four closed, two due to relocation and two temporarily closed for repairs due to damage caused by the March 11, 2011 Japan strengthened againstearthquake, one of which remained closed as of the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted net sales during 2010 by approximately $1,570 (225 basis points)end of 2011). Net sales were also positively impacted by gasoline price inflation during 2010 by approximately $895 (128 basis points), which resulted from a 17% increase in the average sales price per gallon.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

Foreign currencies strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted net sales during 2011 by approximately $1,308, or 172 basis points. Net sales were also positively impacted by gasoline price increases during 2011 by approximately $1,699, or 223 basis points, which resulted from a 24% increase in the average sales price per gallon.

Our sales results continuecontinued to be negatively impacted, albeit to a lesser extent than in 2010, by general economic conditions, and those conditions may continue to have a significantan adverse impact on spending by our members. We believe, however, that due to the nature of our business model, we are better positioned than many retailers to compete in such an environment.

Comparable Sales

Comparable sales, including Mexico for both this year and last year, increased 10% during 2011, and were positively impacted by increases in the average amount spent by our members and in their shopping frequency. The strengthening of foreign currencies favorably impacted comparable sales by approximately $1,260, or 162 basis points during 2011. Gasoline price inflation positively impacted comparable sales results by approximately $1,679, or 220 basis points during 2011. Reported comparable sales growth includes the negative impact of cannibalization (established warehouses losing sales to our newly opened locations).

2010 vs. 2009

Net Sales

Net sales increased $6,366 or 9.1% during 2010 compared to 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in comparable warehouse sales and the remainder primarily from sales at the 13 net new warehouses opened during 2010 (14 opened and one closed due to a relocation).

Foreign currencies strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted net sales during 2010 by approximately $1,570 or 225 basis points. Net sales were also positively impacted by gasoline price inflation during 2010 by approximately $895, or 128 basis points, which resulted from a 17% increase in the average sales price per gallon.

Comparable Sales

Comparable sales increased 7% in 2010 and were positively impacted primarily by an increase in shopping frequency. Strengthening foreign currencies positively impacted comparable sales by approximately $1,510, (217or 217 basis points)points, in 2010. Gasoline price inflation positively impacted comparable sales results by approximately $882, (126or 126 basis points)points, during 2010. Reported comparable sales growth includes the negative impact of cannibalization (established warehouses losing sales to our newly opened locations).

2009 vs. 2008

Net Sales

Our 2009 sales results, particularly in hardlines and softlines, were negatively impacted by general economic conditions. Net sales decreased 1.5% during 2009 compared to 2008. The $1,088 decrease was comprised of a $2,590 decrease in comparable sales, partially offset by an increase of $1,502 primarily from sales at new warehouses opened during 2009 and 2008. Our sales were also impacted by a lower number of warehouse openings year-over-year.

Foreign currencies, particularly in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Korea, weakened against the U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted net sales during 2009 by approximately $2,421 (341 basis points). Net sales were also negatively impacted by gasoline price deflation during 2009 by approximately $2,164 (305 basis points), which resulted from a 30% decline in the average sales price per gallon.

Comparable Sales

Comparable sales decreased 4% in 2009. Weakening foreign currencies negatively impacted comparable sales by approximately $2,339 (333 basis points) in 2009. Gasoline price deflation negatively impacted comparable sales results by approximately $2,113 (298 basis points) during 2009. Comparable sales were negatively impacted by a decline in the average amount spent (after adjustment for gasoline price deflation and measured in local currencies), partially offset by an increase in shopping frequency. Reported comparable sales growth includes the negative impact of cannibalization.

Membership Fees

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Membership fees

  $1,691   $1,533   $1,506    $1,867   $1,691   $1,533  

Membership fees increase

   10.3  1.8  14.7   10.4  10.3  1.8

Membership fees as a percent of net sales

   2.22  2.19  2.12   2.15  2.22  2.19

Total cardholders (000’s)

   58,000    56,000    53,500     64,000    58,000    56,000  

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

2011 vs. 2010

Membership fees increased 10.4% in 2011. Excluding membership fees from Mexico, the increase would have been 8.3% in 2011. This increase was due to the higher penetration of our higher-fee Executive Membership program and the additional membership sign-ups at the 20 net new warehouses opened during 2011. Our member renewal rates are consistent with recent years, currently at 89% in the U.S. and Canada, and approximately 86% on a worldwide basis.

Foreign currencies strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted membership fees in 2011 by approximately $30.

2010 vs. 2009

Membership fees increased 10.3% in 2010 compared to 2009. Membership fees in 2010 were positively impacted due to the increased penetration of our higher-fee Executive Membership program, the continued benefit of membership sign-ups at warehouses opened in 2009, and 2008, a 2009 $27 charge to membership fees related to a litigation settlement concerning our membership renewal policy, and the additional membership sign-ups at the 13 net new warehouses opened in 2010 (14 opened and one closed due to a relocation).2010. Our member renewal rate currently at the end of 2010 was 88% in the U.S. and Canada, is consistent with recent years.

Canada. Foreign currencies particularly in Canada, Korea, and Japan, strengthened against the U.S. dollar in 2010, which positively impacted membership fees by approximately $36.

2009 vs. 2008

Membership fees increased 1.8% in 2009 compared to 2008. The increase was primarily due to membership sign-ups at the 15 new warehouses opened in 2009 (19 opened, two closed due to relocations, and two closed Costco Home locations), the continued benefit of membership sign-ups at warehouses opened in 2008, and increased penetration of our higher-fee Executive Membership program. This increase was negatively impacted by the $27 charge for the litigation settlement discussed above, the weakening of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, particularly in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Korea, which negatively impacted membership fees during 2009 by approximately $50, and a lower number of warehouse openings year-over-year. Our member renewal rate at the end of 2009 was 87% in the U.S. and Canada.

Gross Margin

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Gross margin

  $8,260   $7,554   $7,474    $9,309   $8,260   $7,554  

Gross margin increase

   9.4  1.1  12.6   12.7  9.4  1.1

Gross margin as a percent of net sales

   10.83  10.81  10.53   10.69  10.83  10.81

2011 vs. 2010

Gross margin as a percent of net sales decreased 14 basis points compared to 2010. Gross margin for core merchandise categories (food and sundries, hardlines, softlines, and fresh foods), when expressed as a percent of core merchandise sales, rather than total net sales, increased 18 basis points, primarily due to hardlines and food and sundries. However, when the core merchandise gross margin is expressed as a percentage of total net sales, it decreased two basis points from the prior year due primarily to the increased sales penetration of the lower-margin gasoline business. Warehouse ancillary and other businesses gross margins decreased by two basis points as a percent of total net sales. The gross margin comparison was negatively impacted by $87 or 10 basis points due to a LIFO inventory charge recorded in 2011. The charge resulted from higher costs for our merchandise inventories, primarily food and sundries and gasoline. There was no LIFO inventory charge recorded in 2010.

Excluding the impact of consolidating Mexico, the gross margin comparison as a percent of net sales would have been a decrease of 18 basis points during 2011. Foreign currencies strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted gross margin in 2011 by approximately $149.

2010 vs. 2009

Gross margin as a percent of net sales increased two basis points compared to 2009. TheGross Margin for core merchandise gross margin,categories, when expressed as a percent of core merchandise sales, rather than

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and not Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

total net sales, increased 25 basis points year-over-year, with all categories showing increases. However, the increased sales penetration of the lower margin gasoline business caused this increase to be only six basis points when expressed as a percent of total net sales. Warehouse ancillary businesses gross margins increased by three basis points as a percent of total net sales. In addition, gross margin comparisons were negatively impacted by five basis points due to a favorable $32 LIFO adjustment in 2009 compared to no LIFO adjustment in 2010. Increased penetration of the Executive Membership two-percent reward program and increased spending by Executive Members negatively affected gross margin by two basis points.

Foreign currencies particularly in Canada, Korea, and Japan, strengthened against the U.S. dollar in 2010, which positively impacted gross margin for 2010 by approximately $183.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

2009 vs. 2008

Gross margin, as a percent of net sales, increased 28 basis points compared to 2008. This increase was primarily related to a net 18 basis point increase in our core merchandise departments, primarily in food and sundries, partially offset by a decrease in softlines, and a net seven basis point increase from our warehouse ancillary businesses, primarily our gasoline and pharmacy departments. The majority of this gross margin improvement was due to our lower margin gas business having lower sales penetration, resulting from the decline in the average selling price per gallon. Increased sales penetration of the Executive Membership two-percent reward program negatively affected gross margin by six basis points. In addition, gross margin was favorably impacted by nine basis points due to reversing the $32 LIFO reserve established in the prior year as we experienced net deflation, year-over-year, in the cost of our merchandise inventories.

Foreign currencies, particularly in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Korea, weakened against the U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted gross margin in 2009 by approximately $258.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  $7,840   $7,252   $6,954    $8,682   $7,840   $7,252  

SG&A as a percent of net sales

   10.28  10.38  9.80   9.97  10.28  10.38

2011 vs. 2010

SG&A expenses as a percent of net sales decreased 31 basis points compared to 2010; excluding the effect of gasoline price inflation on net sales, the decrease was 11 basis points. The year-over-year decrease was due to a 15 basis point improvement in our warehouse operating costs, largely payroll. This improvement was partially offset by a non-recurring benefit of $24, or three basis points, recorded in fiscal 2010 related to the refund of a previously recorded Canadian employee tax liability.

The consolidation of Mexico, which compared to our other operating segments has lower SG&A expenses as a percent of its own net sales, favorably impacted SG&A expenses as a percent of net sales by seven basis points in 2011. Foreign currencies strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted SG&A during 2011 by approximately $116.

2010 vs. 2009

SG&A expenses as a percent of net sales improved ten basis points compared to 2009. If2009; excluding the effect of gasoline price inflation on net sales in 2010 is excluded, these expensesSG&A expense increased three basis points compared to 2009.points. Warehouse operating costs, excluding the effect of gasoline price inflation, increased seven basis points, primarily due to higher employee benefit costs, particularly employee healthcare and workers’ compensation. SG&A expense comparisons were positively impacted by six basis points related to: the recoverya $24 refund of amounts expensed in fiscal 2007a previously recorded Canadian employee tax liability; and 2008 on behalf of certain employees in Canada to cover adverse tax consequences resulting from our previously announced stock option investigation; and a $23 charge recorded in 2009 to write down the net realizable value of the cash surrender value of employee life insurance contracts with no comparable charge this year.

in 2010. Foreign currencies particularly in Canada, Korea, and Japan, strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted SG&A for 2010 by approximately $140.

2009 vs. 2008Preopening Expenses

SG&A expenses, as a percent of net sales, increased 58 basis points compared to 2008. Increased warehouse operating and central administrative costs, as a percent of net sales, negatively impacted SG&A by approximately 56 basis points, resulting primarily from lower sales levels and higher employee health care costs. Higher stock-based compensation expense had a negative impact of one basis point. In addition, we recorded an adjustment to the net realizable value of the cash surrender value of employee life insurance contracts, which negatively impacted SG&A, as a percent of net sales, by two basis points. The net realizable value of the insurance contracts is largely based on

   2011   2010   2009 

Preopening expenses

  $46    $26    $41  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Warehouse openings, including relocations

   24     14     19  

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

changes in investment assets underlying the policies and is subject to conditions generally affecting equity and debt markets. In 2008, we recorded a $16 reserve in connection with a legal settlement, which positively impacted the comparison to current year’s SG&A expense, as a percent of net sales, by two basis points.

SG&A expenses, as a percent of net sales, for 2009 were adversely impacted by the decrease in the price of gasoline, as it produced a decline in sales dollars without a comparative reduction in labor or other administrative costs. Foreign currencies, particularly in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Korea, weakened against the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted SG&A for 2009 by approximately $217.

Preopening Expenses

 

   2010  2009  2008

Preopening expenses

  $26  $41  $57
            

Warehouse openings, including relocations

   14   19   34

Preopening expenses include costs incurred for startup operations related to new warehouses and the expansion of ancillary operations at existing warehouses. Preopening expenses can vary due to the number of warehouse openings, the timing of the warehouse opening relative to our year-end, whether the warehouse is owned or leased, and whether the opening is in an existing, new, or international market. The 2009 preopening expense included costs related to several international warehouses that opened in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

Provision for Impaired Assets and Closing Costs, Net

 

  2010  2009  2008   2011   2010   2009 

Warehouse closing expenses

  $6  $9  $9    $8    $6    $9  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   2   8   10     1     2     8  

Net gains on the sale of real property

         (19
            

 

   

 

   

 

 

Provision for impaired assets & closing costs, net

  $8  $17  $    $9    $8    $17  
            

 

   

 

   

 

 

This provision primarily includes costs related to: impairment of long-lived assets; future lease obligations, including contract termination costs, of warehouses that have been closed or relocated to new facilities; and accelerated depreciation, based on the shortened useful life through the expected closing date, on buildings to be demolished or sold and that are not otherwise impaired; and gains and losses resulting from the sale of real property, largely comprised of former warehouse locations.

2010 vs. 2009

impaired. The net provision for impaired assets and closing costs was $8 in 2010, compared to $17 in 2009. The provision in 2010 included charges of $6 for warehouse closing expenses and impairment charges of $2.

2009 vs. 2008

The net provision for impaired assets and closing costs was $17charge in 2009 compared to a nominal amount in 2008. The provision in 2009 included charges of $9 for warehouse closing expenses, and impairment charges of $8, primarily related to the closing of our two Costco Home locations in July 2009. The impairment charge in 2008 primarily related to a warehouse in Michigan that was demolished and rebuilt.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

locations.

At the end of both2011 and 2010, and 2009, the reserve for warehouse closing costs was $5, and primarily related to future lease obligations.obligations and other contractual obligations associated with exiting the properties.

Interest Expense

 

   2010  2009  2008

Interest expense

  $111  $108  $103
   2011   2010   2009 

Interest expense

  $116    $111    $108  

Interest expense primarily relates to our $900 of 5.3% and $1,100 of 5.5% Senior Notes (2007 Senior Notes) issued in fiscal 2007. The 5.3% Senior Notes are due March 15, 2012.

Interest Income and Other, Net

 

  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

Interest income

  $41    $23    $27  

Earnings of affiliates and other, net

  $65  $31  $49   19     65     31  

Interest income

   23   27   96
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

Interest Income and other, net

  $88  $58  $145

Interest income and other, net

  $60    $88    $58  
           

 

   

 

   

 

 

2011 vs. 2010

The increase in interest income year-over-year was attributable to increases in our cash and cash equivalents, including short-term investments, slightly higher interest rates, and the consolidation of our Mexico operations. The decrease in earnings of affiliates and other, net is primarily due to the previously discussed change in the accounting treatment of Mexico (see discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report). In addition, there were net gains from foreign currency transactions and from derivative forward foreign currency contracts of $9 and $14 during 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Derivatives section in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

2010 vs. 2009

The decrease in interest income iswas due to lower interest rates on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances. Interest income also includes a $12 other-than-temporary impairment loss recognized on certain securities within our investment portfolio in 2009. No impairment was recognized in 2010.

The increase in earnings of affiliates and other iswas primarily due to an increase in earnings from our 50% owned joint-venture in Mexico. Costco Mexico’s earningsMexico, which increased due to stronger sales and the Mexican peso strengthening against the U.S. dollar. TheIn addition, there were net gain ongains (losses) from foreign currency transactions was $13and from derivative forward foreign currency contracts of $14 and ($5) in 2010 but was not significant in 2009. These amounts generally relate to the difference between the foreign exchange rate in effect when title to merchandise inventory is transferred and the rate at the time of payment. In addition, there was a favorable $1 mark-to-market adjustment in 2010 compared to a negative $5 adjustment in 2009, related to our forward foreign exchange contracts. See Derivatives section for more information.

2009 vs. 2008

The decrease in interest income was largely due to lower interest rates on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances resulting from a change in policy to invest primarily in U.S. government and agency securities, which earn lower interest rates. In addition, we recognized $12 of other-than-temporary impairment losses on certain securities within our investment portfolio in 2009 compared to an impairment loss of $5 in 2008. The decrease in the earnings of affiliates was primarily attributable to lower earnings by our investment in Costco Mexico. Costco Mexico’s earnings were lower in 2009, primarily due to the peso weakening against the U.S. dollar. In addition, there was a negative $5 mark-to-market adjustment in 2009 compared to a favorable $6 adjustment in 2008, related to our forward foreign exchange contracts.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Income tax expense

  $731   $628   $716    $841   $731   $628  

Effective tax rate

   35.6  36.4  35.6   35.3  35.6  36.4

The effective tax rate for 2011 was positively impacted by a tax refund received by Mexico. This benefit was offset by various discrete items recognized throughout the year.

The decline in the effective tax rate from 2009 to 2010 iswas primarily attributable to a change in the mix of earnings between domestic and international operations. The 2009 effective tax ratesrate also includeincluded the unfavorable impact of a write-down on investments that were non-deductible for tax purposes.

The lower tax rate in 2008 was primarily attributable to discrete benefits recognized during the year.

Net Income Attributable to Costco (Net Income)

   2010  2009  2008 

Net income

  $1,303   $1,086   $1,283  

Net income per diluted share

  $2.92   $2.47   $2.89  

Shares used to calculate diluted net income per diluted share (000’s)

   445,970    440,454    444,240  

Diluted net income per share increase / (decrease)

   18  (15%)   22

2010 vs. 2009

Net income for 2010 increased to $1,303, or $2.92 per diluted share, from $1,086, or $2.47 per diluted share, during 2009, representing an 18% increase in diluted net income per share. As previously discussed, foreign currencies, particularly in Canada, Korea and Japan, strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which positively impacted net income for 2010 by approximately $61 after-tax, or $0.14 per diluted share. Various factors, discussed in detail above (including sales, membership fees, gross margin, and selling, general and administrative expenses), contributed to the increase in net income for 2010.

2009 vs. 2008

Net income for 2009 decreased to $1,086, or $2.47 per diluted share, from $1,283, or $2.89 per diluted share, during 2008, representing a 15% decrease in diluted net income per share. As previously discussed, foreign currencies, particularly in Canada, the United Kingdom and Korea, weakened against the U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted net income for 2009 by approximately $83 after-tax, or $0.19 per diluted share. Various factors, discussed in detail above (including sales, membership fees, gross margin, and selling, general and administrative expenses), contributed to the decrease in net income for 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (dollars in millions, except per share data)

Cash Flows

The following table itemizes components of our most liquid assets at the end of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions, except per share data):assets:

 

   2010  2009

Cash and cash equivalents

  $3,214  $3,157

Short-term investments

   1,535   570
        

Total

  $4,749  $3,727
        

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

   2011   2010 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $4,009    $3,214  

Short-term investments

   1,604     1,535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $5,613    $4,749  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from warehouse operations and cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances. Of these balances, which were $4,749approximately $982 and $3,727$862 at the end of 20102011 and 2009, respectively. Of these balances, approximately $862 and $758 at the end of 2010, and 2009, respectively, represented debit and credit card receivables, primarily related to sales in the week prior to the end of our fiscal year.

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $3,198 in 2011 compared to $2,780 in 2010, compared to $2,092 in 2009. This netan increase of $688$418. This increase was primarily attributable to a $371 decrease$219 increase in net income including noncontrolling interests, an $87 increase from the change in other current operating assets and liabilities, a $77 increase in deferred income taxes, and a $60 increase in depreciation and amortization, partially offset by an increase in our net investment in merchandise inventories (merchandise inventories less accounts payable), an increase in net income of $224, and a $141 increase from the change in our other current operating assets and liabilities.$70.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $1,180 in 2011 compared to $2,015 in 2010, compared to $1,101 in 2009, an increasea decrease of $914.$835. This increase relates primarily to a $1,113 decrease in cash provided byused was primarily attributable to an $896 decrease in cash used in the

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

net investment in short-term investments and a $165 cash increase representing the cash and cash equivalents on Mexico’s balance sheet as of August 29, 2010, partially offset by a $195 decreasean increase in cash used for purchasecapital expenditures of property and equipment.$235. Mexico was consolidated as of the beginning of fiscal 2011 due to the adoption of a new accounting standard. See discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $1,277 in 2011 compared to $719 in 2010, compared to $439 in 2009, an increase of $280.$558. This increase was primarily attributable to a $482$73 increase in cash used to repurchase Costco’s common stock a $78 increase in repayments of long-term debt and a $42 increase in dividends paid. These were partially offset by a $124 increase$519 reduction in the net proceeds from stock-based awards and, a $116 increaseamount of bank checks outstanding. The reduction in the net proceeds from short-term borrowings.bank checks outstanding is due to maintaining higher balances in banks on which our checks are drawn.

The effect of exchangeExchange rate changes increased cash and cash equivalents by $54 in 2011, compared to an increase of $11 in 2010, compared to a decreasean increase of $14 in 2009.$43. This increase was primarily due to the strengthening of foreign currencies primarilyagainst the U.S. dollar during 2011.

Management believes that our current cash position and operating cash flows will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements for the foreseeable future. We have not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative undistributed earnings of $2,646 and $1,972 at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively, of certain non-U.S. consolidated subsidiaries and other entities, including our 50% owned investment in Canada, Korea,Mexico, as such earnings are deemed by us to be indefinitely reinvested. Cash and Japan during 2010.cash equivalents and short-term investments held by these consolidated subsidiaries and other entities may not be available to be used for certain financing activities such as the repayment of short-term debt or to repurchase common stock. At August 28, 2011, cash and cash equivalent balances and short-term investments of $1,828 were held by these non-U.S. consolidated subsidiaries and other entities.

Dividends

In April 2010,2011, our Board of Directors increased our quarterly cash dividend from $0.18$0.205 to $0.205$0.24 per share. Our quarterly cash dividends paid in 20102011 totaled $0.77$0.89 per share, as compared to $0.68$0.77 per share in 2009.2010.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

Contractual Obligations

OurAs of August 28, 2011, our commitments at year-end to make future payments under contractual obligations were as follows, as of August 29, 2010:follows:

 

   Payments Due by Fiscal Year

Contractual obligations

  2011  2012 to
2013
  2014 to
2015
  2016 and
thereafter
  Total

Purchase obligations (merchandise)(1)

  $4,492  $1  $  $  $4,493

Long-term debt(2)

   111   1,073   126   1,379   2,689

Operating leases(3)

   162   312   282   1,572   2,328

Purchase obligations (property, equipment, services and other)(4)

   246   63         309

Construction commitments

   186            186

Capital lease obligations(2)

   10   20   22   256   308

Other(5)

   6   4   2   26   38
                    

Total

  $5,213  $1,473  $432  $3,233  $10,351
                    

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

   Payments Due by Fiscal Year 

Contractual obligations

  2012   2013 to
2014
   2015 to
2016
   2017 and
thereafter
   Total 

Purchase obligations (merchandise)(1)

  $5,879    $    $    $    $5,879  

Long-term debt(2)

   1,011     126     126     1,329     2,592  

Operating leases(3)

   183     357     317     1,850     2,707  

Purchase obligations (property, equipment, services and other)(4)

   324     71     19          414  

Construction commitments

   191                    191  

Capital lease obligations(2)

   13     26     26     311     376  

Other(5)

   5     4     2     32     43  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $7,606    $584    $490    $3,522    $12,202  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes open merchandise purchase orders.

 

(2)

Includes contractual interest payments.

 

(3)

Operating lease obligations exclude amounts commonly referred to as common area maintenance, taxes, and insurance and have been reduced by $173$183 to reflect sub-lease income.

 

(4)

The amounts exclude certain services negotiated at the individual warehouse or regional level that are not significant and generally contain clauses allowing for cancellation without significant penalty.

 

(5)

Consists of $26$31 in asset retirement obligations, $9 in deferred compensation obligations and includes $3 of current unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain tax positions. The total amount excludes $38$50 of noncurrent unrecognized tax benefits due to uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash payments.

Expansion Plans

Our primary requirement for capital is the financing of land, buildings, and equipment costs for new and remodeled warehouses. To a lesser extent, capital is also required for initial warehouse operations and working capital. While there can be no assurance that current expectations will be realized and plans are subject to change upon further review, it is our current intention to spend approximately $1,400 to $1,600 during fiscal 20112012 for real estate, construction, remodeling, and equipment for warehouses and related operations. These expenditures are expected to be financed with a combination of cash provided from operations and existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.

We plan to open up to 3120 net new warehouses in 2012, and at least one relocation of an existing warehouse to a larger and better-located facility. In addition, the closed warehouse in Japan is expected to re-open in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

We opened 20 net new warehouses in 2011 including one to two relocations of existing warehouses to larger and better-located facilities.

Additional Equity Investments in Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures

Our investments in the Costco Mexico joint venture and in other unconsolidated joint ventures that are less than majority owned are accounted for under the equity method. We did not make anyspent $1,290 on capital contributions to Costco Mexico (a 50%-owned joint venture) in 2010, 2009, or 2008.expenditures.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

Bank Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper Programs

 

 Credit Facility
Description
 Expiration
Date
 Credit Line Usage at
August 29, 2010
 Applicable
Interest
Rate
  Credit Facility
Description
 Expiration
Date
 Credit Line Activity at
August 28, 2011
 Applicable
Interest
Rate
 

Entity

 Total of
all Credit
Facilities
 Stand-by
Letter of
Credit
(LC) &

Letter of
Guaranty
 Commercial
LC
 Short-
Term
Borrowing
 Available
Credit
  Total of
all Credit
Facilities
 Stand-by
Letter of
Credit
(LC) &
Letter of
Guaranty
 Commercial
LC
 Short-
Term
Borrowing
 Available
Credit
 

U.S.

 Uncommitted
Standby LC
 N/A $22 $22 $—   $—   $—   N/A   Uncommitted
Standby LC
 N/A $17   $17   $   $   $    N/A  

U.S.

 Uncommitted
Commercial LC
 N/A  50  —    9  —    41 N/A   Uncommitted
Commercial LC
 N/A  50        21        29    N/A  

Australia(1)

 Guarantee Line N/A  9  —    —    —    9 N/A   Guarantee Line N/A  10    2            8    N/A  

Canada(1)(3)

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 N/A  28  16  —    —    12 2.25 Multi-Purpose
Line
 N/A  30    22            8    2.35

Japan(1)

 Revolving Credit March-11  41  —    —    13  28 0.61

Japan(1)(4)

 Revolving Credit February-12  72                72    0.58

Japan(1)

 Bank Guaranty March-11  18  18  —    —    —   N/A   Bank Guaranty March-12  20    20                N/A  

Japan(1)

 Revolving Credit February-11  41  —    —    13  28 0.61 Revolving Credit February-12  46                46    0.58

Japan(2)

 Commercial LC N/A  1  —    —    —    1 N/A   Commercial LC N/A  1                1    N/A  

Korea(1)

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 March-11  10  2  —    —    8 3.63 Multi-Purpose
Line
 March-12  11    1    1        9    4.39

Mexico

 Commercial LC October-11  3                3    N/A  

Mexico

 Commercial LC N/A  3                3    N/A  

Taiwan

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 January-11  22  5  —    —    17 2.63 Multi-Purpose
Line
 January-12  24    10            14    2.75

Taiwan

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 July-11  16  3  —    —    13 2.65 Multi-Purpose
Line
 July-12  17    3            14    2.79

United Kingdom

 Uncommitted
Money Market
Line
 N/A  31  —    —    —    31 3.05 Uncommitted
Money Market
Line
 N/A  32                32    3.10

United Kingdom

 Uncommitted
Overdraft Line
 N/A  46  —    —    —    46 1.50 Uncommitted
Overdraft Line
 N/A  49                49    1.50

United Kingdom(2)

 Letter of
Guarantee
 N/A  3  3  —    —    —   N/A   Letter of
Guarantee
 N/A  3    3                N/A  

United Kingdom

 Commercial LC N/A  3  1  —    —    2 N/A   Commercial LC N/A  3    1            2    N/A  
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  
  TOTAL $341 $70 $9 $26 $236   TOTAL $391   $79   $22   $   $290   
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

(1)

The U.S. parent company, Costco Wholesale Corporation, guarantees this entity’s credit facility.

 

(2)

Obligations under this facility are fully cash-collateralized by the subsidiary.

 

(3)

The bank may cancel or restrict availability under this facility with 45-days written notice.

(4)

This credit facility’s total facility amount will decrease to approximately $26 in November 2011.

Item 7 – 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

 Credit Line Usage at
August 30, 2009
  Credit Facility
Description
 Expiration
Date
 Credit Line Usage at
August 29, 2010
 Applicable
Interest
Rate
 

Entity

 Credit Facility
Description
 Expiration
Date
 Total of
all Credit
Facilities
 Stand-by
LC &

Letter of
Guaranty
 Commercial
LC
 Short-
Term
Borrowing
 Available
Credit
 Applicable
Interest
Rate
  Total of
all Credit
Facilities
 Stand-by
Letter of
Credit
(LC) &
Letter of
Guaranty
 Commercial
LC
 Short-
Term
Borrowing
 Available
Credit
 

U.S.

 Uncommitted
Stand By

LC

 N/A $22 $22 $—   $—   $—   N/A   Uncommitted
Standby LC
 N/A $22   $22   $   $   $    N/A  

U.S.

 Uncommitted
Commercial LC
 N/A  50  —    20  —    30 N/A   Uncommitted
Commercial LC
 N/A  50        9        41    N/A  

Australia(1)

 Guarantee
Line
 N/A  8  —    —    —    8 N/A   Guarantee Line N/A  9                9    N/A  

Canada(1)(3)

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 March-10  28  18  —    —    10 1.76 Multi-Purpose
Line
 N/A  28    16            12    2.25

Japan(1)

 Revolving

Credit

 February-10  37  —    —    8  29 0.64 Revolving Credit March-11  41            13    28    0.61

Japan(1)

 Bank Guaranty March-10  11  11  —    —    —   N/A   Bank Guaranty March-11  18    18                N/A  

Japan(1)

 Revolving

Credit

 February-10  37  —    —    8  29 0.70 Revolving Credit February-11  41            13    28    0.61

Japan(2)

 Commercial LC N/A  1  —    —    —    1 N/A   Commercial LC N/A  1                1    N/A  

Korea(1)

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 March-10  10  1  —    —    9 3.75 Multi-Purpose
Line
 March-11  10    2            8    3.63

Taiwan

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 January-10  15  4  —    —    11 2.50 Multi-Purpose
Line
 January-11  22    5            17    2.63

Taiwan

 Multi-Purpose
Line
 July-10  15  3  —    —    12 2.59 Multi-Purpose
Line
 July-11  16    3            13    2.65

United Kingdom

 Revolving

Credit

 February-10  66  —    —    —    66 0.82 Uncommitted
Money Market
Line
 N/A  31                31    3.05

United Kingdom

 Uncommitted
Money Market
Line
 N/A  33  —    —    —    33 3.05 Uncommitted
Overdraft Line
 N/A  46                46    1.50

United Kingdom

 Uncommitted

Overdraft Line

 N/A  49  —    —    —    49 1.50

United Kingdom(2)

 Letter of
Guarantee
 N/A  3  3  —    —    —   N/A   Letter of
Guarantee
 N/A  3    3                N/A  

United Kingdom

 Commercial LC N/A  3  —    1  —    2 N/A   Commercial LC N/A  3    1            2    N/A  
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  
  TOTAL $388 $62 $21 $16 $289   TOTAL $341   $70   $9   $26   $236   
                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

��

  

 

  

 

(1)

The U.S. parent company, Costco Wholesale Corporation, guarantees this entity’s credit facility.

 

(2)

Obligations under this facility are fully cash-collateralized by the subsidiary.

(3)

The bank may cancel or restrict availability under this facility with 45-days written notice.

For those entities with multi-purpose lines, any issuance of either letters of credit or short-term borrowings will result in a corresponding decrease in available credit. Our letter of credit facilities consisted of the following at August 29, 201028, 2011 and August 30, 2009:29, 2010:

 

  2010  2009  2011   2010 

Total credit facilities for commercial and standby letters of credit

  $123  $116

Total credit facilities for commercial and standby letter of credit

  $138    $123  

Outstanding commitments under these facilities(1)

   79   83   101     79  

 

(1)

Includes $70$79 and $62$70 of standby letters of credit at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

Financing Activities

In March 2011, we reclassified our $900 5.3% Senior Notes due March 15, 2012, originally issued in February 2007, to a current liability within the current portion of long-term debt within the consolidated balance sheets to reflect its maturity of less than one year. Upon maturity, we intend to repay the outstanding principal balance and associated interest with our existing liquidity sources of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments balances.

In April 2010, our Japanese subsidiary paid the outstanding principal and interest balances totaling $44 related to the 0.92% promissory notes due April 2010, originally issued in April 2003. In November 2009, our Japanese subsidiary paid the outstanding principal and interest balances totaling $33 related to the 0.88% promissory notes due November 2009, originally issued in November 2002.

In June 2008, our Japanese subsidiary entered into a ten-year term loan in the amount of $35,$39, with a variable rate of interest of Yen TIBOR (6-month) plus a 0.35% margin (0.84%(0.79% and 0.95%0.84% at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively) on the outstanding balance. Interest is payable semi-annually in December and June and principal is due in June 2018.

In October 2007, our Japanese subsidiary issued promissory notes through a private placement in the amount of $77,$85, bearing interest at 2.695%. Interest is payable semi-annually, and principal is due in October 2017. We guarantee all of the promissory notesfinancial instruments issued by our Japanese subsidiary.

In February 2007, we issued $900 of 5.3% Senior Notes due March 15, 2012 (2012 Notes) at a discount of $2 and $1,100 of 5.5% Senior Notes due March 15, 2017 (2017 Notes) at a discount of $6 (together the 2007 Senior Notes). Interest on the 2007 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The discount and issuance costs associated with the 2007 Senior Notes are being amortized to interest expense over the terms of those notes. At our option, we may redeem the 2007 Senior Notes at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price plus accrued interest. The redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the 2007 Senior Notes to be redeemed, or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest to maturity. Additionally, we will be required to make an offer to purchase the 2007 Senior Notes at a price of 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase, upon certain events as defined by the terms of the 2007 Senior Notes.

In August 1997, we sold $900 principal amount at maturity 3.5% Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Notes (Zero Coupon Notes) due in August 2017. The Zero Coupon Notes were priced with a yield to maturity of 3.5%, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $450. The remaining Zero Coupon Notes outstanding are convertible into a maximum of 943,000878,000 shares of Costco Common Stock shares at an initial conversion price of $22.71. Holders of the Zero Coupon Notes may require us to purchase the Zero Coupon Notes (at the discounted issue price plus accrued interest to date of purchase) in August 2012. At our option, we may redeem the Zero Coupon Notes (at the discounted issue price plus accrued interest to date of redemption) any time after August 2002. As of August 29, 2010, $85928, 2011, $862 in principal amount of Zero Coupon Notes had been converted by note holders tointo shares of Costco Common Stock, of which the principal converted during 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009 is detailed in the table below:

 

   2010  2009  2008

Principal converted during period

  $1  $25  $1

Principal converted, including the related debt discount

  $1  $19  $0

Shares issued upon conversion (000’s)

   18   562   13

Derivatives

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of our business, which we manage, in part, through the use of forward foreign exchange contracts seeking to hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on known future expenditures denominated in a foreign

   2011   2010   2009 

Principal converted during period

  $3    $1    $25  

Principal converted, including the related debt discount

  $2    $1    $19  

Shares issued upon conversion (000’s)

   65     18     562  

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

Derivatives

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of business. We manage these fluctuations, in part, through the use of forward foreign-exchange contracts, seeking to economically hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign-exchange on known future expenditures denominated in a foreign currency. The contracts are intended primarily to economically hedge our exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures.expenditures made by our international subsidiaries or other entities whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. We seek to mitigate risk with the use of these contracts and do not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features.

We seek to manage the counterparty risk associated with these contracts by limiting transactions to counterparties with which we have established banking relationships. There can be no assurance, however, that this practice effectively mitigates counterparty risk. TheThese contracts are limited to less than one year.year in duration. See Note 1 and Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report for additional information related to these contracts.on the fair value of open, unsettled forward foreign-exchange contracts as of August 28, 2011, and August 29, 2010.

We are exposed to risks due to fluctuations in prices for energy prices,that we consume, particularly electricity and natural gas, which we seek to partially mitigate through the use of fixed-price contracts for approximately 26%36% of our warehouses and other facilities, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. We also enter into variable-priced contracts for some purchases of natural gas, in addition to fuel for our gas stations, on an index basis. These contracts meet the characteristics of derivative instruments but generally qualify for treatment as normalthe “normal purchases or normal salessales” exception under authoritative guidance and thus require no mark-to-market adjustment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

With the exception of our operating leases, weWe have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have had, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition or consolidated financial statements.

Stock Repurchase Programs

In September and November of 2007,April 2011, our Board of Directors approved $300 and $1,000, respectively,authorized a new stock repurchase program in the amount of stock repurchases, which expire$4,000, expiring in August 2010 and November 2010. In July 2008, our Board of Directors approved an additional $1,000, which expires in July 2011,April 2015, bringing total authorizations by our Board of Directors since inception of the program in 2001 to $6,800.$10,800. The authorization in April 2011 revoked previously authorized but unused amounts totaling $792.

During 2011, we repurchased 8,939,000 shares of common stock, at an average price of $71.74 per share, totaling approximately $641. During 2010, we repurchased 9,943,000 shares of common stock, at an average price of $57.14 per share, totaling approximately $568. During 2009, we repurchased 895,000 shares of common stock, at an average price of $63.84 per share, totaling approximately $57. The remaining amount available to be purchased under our approved plan was $1,434$3,706 at the end of 2010, $434 of which expires in November 2010.2011. Purchases are made from time-to-time, as conditions warrant, in the open market or in block purchases and pursuant to plans under SEC Rule 10b5-1. Repurchased shares are retired, in accordance with the Washington Business Corporation Act.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make estimates and judgments. We continue to review our accounting policies and evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

recognition, investments, merchandise inventory valuation, impairment of long-lived assets, warehouse closing costs, insurance/self-insurance liabilities, and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

We generally recognize sales, net of estimated returns, at the time the member takes possession of merchandise or receives services. When we collect payment from customers prior to the transfer of ownership of merchandise or the performance of services, the amount received is generally recorded as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets until the sale or service is completed. We provide for estimated sales returns based on historical trends in merchandise returns.returns, net of the estimated net realizable value of merchandise inventories to be returned and any estimated disposition costs. Amounts collected from members that under common trade practices are referred to as sales taxes are recorded on a net basis.

We evaluate whether it is appropriate to record the gross amount of merchandise sales and related costs or the net amount earned as commissions. Generally, when we are the primary obligor, subject to inventory risk, have latitude in establishing prices and selecting suppliers, influence product or service specifications, or have several but not all of these indicators, revenue is recorded on a gross basis. If we are not the primary obligor and do not possess other indicators of gross reporting as noted above, we record the net amounts as commissions earned, which is reflected in net sales.

Membership fee revenue represents annual membership fees paid by our members. We account for membership fee revenue, net of estimated refunds, on a deferred basis, whereby revenue is recognized ratably over the one-year membership period.

Our Executive members qualify for a 2% reward (which can be redeemed only at Costco warehouses), up to a maximum of approximately $500 per year, on qualified purchases made at Costco. We account for this 2% reward as a reduction in sales, with the related liability being classified within other current liabilities. The sales reduction and corresponding liability are computed after giving effect to the estimated impact of non-redemptions based on historical data.

Investments

Investments are reviewed quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment. This determination requires significant judgment. We employ a methodology that considers available quantitative and qualitative evidence in evaluating potential impairment of our investments.evidence. If the cost of an investment exceeds its fair value, we evaluate, among other factors, general market conditions, the duration and extent to which the fair value is less than cost, and our intent and ability to hold the investment. We also consider specific adverse conditions related to the financial health of and business outlook for the issuer, including industry and sector performance, operational and financing cash flow factors, and rating agency actions. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established. If market, industry, and/or issuer conditions deteriorate, we may incur future impairments.

Merchandise Inventories

Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, as determined primarily by the retail inventory method, of accounting, and are stated using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for substantially all U.S. merchandise inventories. Merchandise inventories for all foreign operations are primarily valued by the retail inventory method of accounting and are stated using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We believe the LIFO method

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

more fairly presents the results of operations by more closely matching current costs with current revenues. We record an adjustment each quarter, if necessary, for the expected annualestimated effect of inflation or deflation, and these estimates are adjusted to actual results determined at year-end. AtDue to inflation, in 2011 the end of 2008, due to overall net inflationary trends, merchandise

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data) (Continued)

inventories valued at LIFO were lower than the FIFO value, resulting in a $32 charge to merchandise costs.costs of $87. During 2009, due to overall net deflationary trends, wethe Company recorded a $32 benefit to merchandise costs to adjust inventories valued at LIFO. At the end of 2010 and 2009, merchandise inventories valued at LIFO approximated FIFO after considering the lower of cost or market principle.

We provide for estimated inventory losses (shrink) between physical inventory counts as a percentage of net sales. The provision is adjusted periodically to reflect results of the actual physical inventory counts, which generally occur in the second and fourth quarters of the year.

Inventory cost, where appropriate, is reduced by estimates of vendor rebates when earned or as we progress toward earning those rebates, provided they are probable and reasonably estimable. Other consideration received from vendors is generally recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs upon completion of contractual milestones, terms of agreement, or other systematic and rational approaches.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Warehouse Closing costs

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment, such as a decision to relocate or close a warehouse facility. Our judgments are based on existing market and operational conditions. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment factors exist, requiring a downward adjustment of these assets to their then-current fair market value.

We provide estimates for warehouse closing costs for leased and owned locations to be closed or relocated. A considerable amount of judgmentJudgment is involved in determining any impairment or our net liability, particularly related to the estimated sales price of owned locations and the potential sublease income at leased locations. These estimates are based on real estate conditions in the markets and our experience in those markets. We make assumptions about the average period of time it would take to sublease the location and the amount of potential sublease income for each leased location. We reassess our liability each quarter and adjust our liability accordingly when our estimates change.

Insurance/Self InsuranceSelf-Insurance Liabilities

We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance mechanisms, including a wholly-owned captive insurance entity and participation in a reinsurance pool, to provide for potential liabilities for workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage, directordirectors and officers’officers liability, vehicle liability, and employee health care benefits. Liabilities associated with the risks that we retain are not discounted and are estimated, in part, by considering historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends.

Income Taxes

At the beginning of 2008, we adopted authoritative guidance related to uncertain tax positions, which sets out criteria for the use of judgment in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items and the probability of sustaining uncertain tax positions. The benefits associated with uncertain tax positions are recorded in our consolidated financial statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the positions will withstand challenge from tax authorities. When facts and circumstances change, we reassess these probabilities and record any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate.

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(dollars in millions, except per share and warehouse number data)(Continued)

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See discussion of Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report.

Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to financial market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not engage in speculative or leveraged transactions or hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment holdings that are diversified among money market funds, U.S. Governmentgovernment and Agency debtagency securities, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured corporate notes, and corporate notes and bonds with effective maturities of generally three months to five years at the date of purchase. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal and secondarily to generate yields. The majority of our short-term investments are in fixed interest rate securities. These securities are subject to changes in fair value due to interest rate fluctuations. A revised investment policy was approved in December 2007 by our Board of Directors, limiting future investments to direct U.S. Governmentgovernment and Government Agencygovernment agency obligations, repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Governmentgovernment and Government Agencygovernment agency obligations, and U.S. Governmentgovernment and Government Agency Money Marketgovernment agency money market funds.

The investment policies of our subsidiaries are consistent with our primary objective to preserve principal and secondarily to generate yields. Our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary invests in U.S. Governmentgovernment and Government Agencygovernment agency obligations, corporate notes and bonds, and asset and mortgage-backed securities with a minimum overall portfolio average credit rating of AAA.

AA+. All of our foreign subsidiaries’ investments are primarily in money market funds, investment grade securities, bankers’ acceptances, bank certificates of deposit and term deposits, all denominated in their local currencies. Additionally, our Canadian subsidiary may invest a portion of its investments in U.S. dollar investment grade securities and bank term deposits to meet current U.S. dollar obligations.

Because most of our investments in cash and cash equivalents are short-term, interest rate changes are notless likely to be material to our financial statements. Based on our overnight investments and bank balances within cash and cash equivalents at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would result in an increase or decrease of approximately $23$29 and $24$23 (pre-tax), respectively, to interest income on an annual basis. For those investments that are classified as available-for-sale, the unrealized gains or losses related to fluctuations in market volatility and interest rates are reflected within stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The nature and amount of our long and short-term debt may vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. As of the end of 2010,2011, our fixed-rate long-term debt included: $41$1,100 of 5.5% Senior Notes carried at $1,097; $900 of 5.3% Senior Notes carried at $900; $38 principal amount at maturity of 3.5% Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Notes carried at $32; $900 of 5.3% Senior Notes carried at $899; and $1,100 of 5.5% Senior Notes carried at $1,096,$31; and additional notes totaling $78.$86. Additionally, our variable rate long-term debt included a 0.35% over Yen Tibor (6-month) Term Loan of $35.$39. Fluctuations in interest rates may affect the fair value of the fixed-rate debt and may affect the interest expense related to the variable rate debt. See

Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (Continued)

Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report for more information on our long and short-term debt.

Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (Continued)

Foreign Currency-Exchange Risk

Our foreign subsidiaries conduct limited transactions in their non-functional currencies, which exposes us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We manage these fluctuations, in part, through the use of forward foreign exchange contracts, seeking to hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on known future expenditures denominated in a foreign currency.

As of August 29, 2010,28, 2011, and August 30, 2009,29, 2010, we held forward foreign exchange contracts with a notional amount of $247 and $225, respectively. At the end of 2011, the fair value of assets and $183,liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets were $1 and $2, respectively. At the end of 2010, and 2009,the fair value of assets ofand liabilities were $1 and $2, respectively, and a fair value liabilities of $3, and $4, respectively, were recorded on our consolidated balance sheets.respectively. A hypothetical 10% strengthening of the functional currency compared to the non-functional currency exchange rates at August 29, 201028, 2011 and August 30, 200929, 2010, would have decreased the fair value of the contracts by $23$25 and $18,$23, respectively.

Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial statements of Costco are as follows:

 

   Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  42

Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of August 29, 201028, 2011 and August 30, 200929, 2010

  ��44

Consolidated Statements of Income, for the 52 weeks ended August 28, 2011, August  29, 2010, and August 30, 2009 and August 31, 2008

  45

Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income, for the 52 weeks ended August 28, 2011,  August 29, 2010, and August 30, 2009 and August 31, 2008

  46

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the 52 weeks ended August 28, 2011, August  29, 2010, and August 30, 2009 and August 31, 2008

  47

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  48

Management’s Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related financial information. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include certain amounts that are based on estimates and informed judgments. Our management also prepared the related financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who conducted their audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The independent registered public accounting firm’s responsibility is to express an opinion as to the fairness with which such financial statements present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Item 9—Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A—Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal year that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

The certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibit 31.1 to this report.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and the dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 29, 2010,28, 2011, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 29, 2010.28, 2011. The attestation of KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included with the financial statements in Item 8 of this Report.

/S/ JAMES D. SINEGAL

 

James D. Sinegal

Chief Executive Officer

/S/ RICHARD A. GALANTI

 

Richard A. Galanti

Executive Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

Item 9B—Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10—Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information relating to the availability of our code of ethics for senior financial officers and a list of our executive officers appear in Item 1 of this Report. The information required by this Item concerning our directors and nominees for director is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” “Directors,” “Committees of the Board” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in Costco’s Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on January 27, 201126, 2012 (“Proxy Statement”). The Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year.

Item 11—Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation,” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in Costco’s Proxy Statement.

Item 12—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Costco’s Proxy Statement.

Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” “Directors,” “Committees of the Board,” “Shareholder Communications to the Board,” “Meeting Attendance,” “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,” “Certain Relationships and Transactions” and “Report of the Audit Committee” in Costco’s Proxy Statement.

Item 14—Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Independent Public Accountants” in Costco’s Proxy Statement.

PART IV

Item 15—Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

 (a)

Documents filed as part of this report are as follows:

 

 1.

Financial Statements:

See the listing of Financial Statements included as a part of this Form 10-K on Item 8 of Part II.

 

 2.

Financial Statement Schedules—None.Schedules:

All schedules have been omitted because the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements, including the notes thereto.

 

 3.

Exhibits:

The required exhibits are included at the end of the Form 10-K Annual Report and are described in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the first exhibit.

 

 (b)

Financial Statement Schedules—None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

October 15, 201014, 2011

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

(Registrant)

By

 /s/ RICHARD A. GALANTI
 

Richard A. Galanti

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By

 /s/ JAMES D. SINEGAL  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

James D. Sinegal

Chief Executive Officer and Director

  

By

 /s/ JEFFREY H. BROTMAN  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Jeffrey H. Brotman

Chairman of the Board

  

By

 /s/ W. CRAIG JELINEK  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

W. Craig Jelinek

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

  

By

 /s/ RICHARD A. GALANTI  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Richard A. Galanti

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and

Director (Principal Financial Officer)

  

By

 /s/ DAVID S. PETTERSON  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

David S. Petterson

Senior Vice President and Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

  

By

 /s/ BENJAMIN S. CARSON, SR., M.D.  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., M.D.

Director

  

By

 /s/ SUSAN L. DECKER  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Susan L. Decker

Director

  

By

 /s/ RICHARDS/ DANIEL D. DJ. EICERCHIOVANS  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Richard D. DiCerchioDaniel J. Evans

Director

  

By

 /S/ DANIEL J. EVANS

October 15, 2010

Daniel J. Evans

Director

By

/S/ WILLIAM H. GATES  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

William H. Gates

Director

  

By

 /S/ HAMILTON E. JAMES  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Hamilton E. James

Director

  

By

 /S/ RICHARD M. LIBENSON  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Richard M. Libenson

Director

  

By

 /S/ JOHN W. MEISENBACH  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

John W. Meisenbach

Director

  

By

 /S/ CHARLES T. MUNGER  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Charles T. Munger

Director

  

By

 /S/ JEFFREY S. RAIKES  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Jeffrey S. Raikes

Director

  

By

 /S/ JILL S. RUCKELSHAUS  

October 15, 201014, 2011

 

Jill S. Ruckelshaus

Director

  

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Costco Wholesale Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Costco Wholesale Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 29, 201028, 2011 and August 30, 200929, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of income, equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the 52-week periods ended August 28, 2011, August 29, 2010, and August 30, 2009, and August 31, 2008.2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Costco Wholesale Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 29, 201028, 2011 and August 30, 2009,29, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the 52-week periods ended August 28, 2011, August 29, 2010, and August 30, 2009, and August 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1, the Company changed its accounting policy for minority interests as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (included in FASB ASC Topic 810,Consolidation) effective August 31, 2009.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 29, 2010,28, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated October 15, 201014, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington

October 15, 201014, 2011

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Costco Wholesale Corporation:

We have audited Costco Wholesale Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 29, 2010,28, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting included in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 29, 2010,28, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of August 29, 201028, 2011 and August 30, 2009,29, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the 52-week periods ended August 28, 2011, August 29, 2010, and August 30, 2009, and August 31, 2008, and our report dated October 15, 201014, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington

October 15, 201014, 2011

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in millions, except par value and share data)

 

  August 29,
2010
 August 30,
2009
   August 28,
2011
 August 29,
2010
 
ASSETS      

CURRENT ASSETS

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $3,214   $3,157    $4,009   $3,214  

Short-term investments

   1,535    570     1,604    1,535  

Receivables, net

   884    834     965    884  

Merchandise inventories

   5,638    5,405     6,638    5,638  

Deferred income taxes and other current assets

   437    371     490    437  
         

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   11,708    10,337     13,706    11,708  
         

 

  

 

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

      

Land

   3,484    3,341     3,819    3,484  

Buildings and improvements

   9,096    8,453     10,278    9,096  

Equipment and fixtures

   3,513    3,265     4,002    3,513  

Construction in progress

   267    264     269    267  
         

 

  

 

 
   16,360    15,323     18,368    16,360  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (5,046  (4,423   (5,936  (5,046
         

 

  

 

 

Net property and equipment

   11,314    10,900     12,432    11,314  
         

 

  

 

 

OTHER ASSETS

   793    742     623    793  
         

 

  

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $23,815   $21,979    $26,761   $23,815  
         

 

  

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY      

CURRENT LIABILITIES

      

Short-term borrowings

  $26   $16    $0   $26  

Accounts payable

   5,947    5,450     6,544    5,947  

Current portion of long-term debt

   900    0  

Accrued salaries and benefits

   1,571    1,418     1,758    1,571  

Accrued sales and other taxes

   322    302     335    322  

Other current liabilities

   1,540    1,328  

Deferred membership fees

   869    824     973    869  

Current portion of long-term debt

   0    80  

Other current liabilities

   1,328    1,191  
         

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   10,063    9,281     12,050    10,063  

LONG-TERM DEBT, excluding current portion

   2,141    2,130     1,253    2,141  

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES

   681    464     885    681  
         

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   12,885    11,875     14,188    12,885  
         

 

  

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

      

EQUITY

      

Preferred stock $.005 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

   0    0     0    0  

Common stock $.005 par value; 900,000,000 shares authorized; 433,510,000 and 435,974,000 shares issued and outstanding

   2    2  

Common stock $.005 par value; 900,000,000 shares authorized 434,266,000 and 433,510,000 shares issued and outstanding

   2    2  

Additional paid-in capital

   4,115    3,811     4,516    4,115  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   122    110     373    122  

Retained earnings

   6,590    6,101     7,111    6,590  
         

 

  

 

 

Total Costco stockholders’ equity

   10,829    10,024     12,002    10,829  

Noncontrolling interests

   101    80     571    

 

101

 

  

 

         

 

  

 

 

Total equity

   10,930    10,104     12,573    10,930  
         

 

  

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

  $23,815   $21,979    $26,761   $23,815  
         

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

 

  52 weeks ended
August  29,

2010
 52 weeks ended
August  30,

2009
 52 weeks ended
August  31,

2008
   52 weeks ended
August 28,
2011
 52 weeks ended
August 29,
2010
 52 weeks ended
August 30,
2009
 

REVENUE

        

Net sales

  $76,255   $69,889   $70,977    $87,048   $76,255   $69,889  

Membership fees

   1,691    1,533    1,506     1,867    1,691    1,533  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenue

   77,946    71,422    72,483     88,915    77,946    71,422  

OPERATING EXPENSES

        

Merchandise costs

   67,995    62,335    63,503     77,739    67,995    62,335  

Selling, general and administrative

   7,840    7,252    6,954     8,682    7,840    7,252  

Preopening expenses

   26    41    57     46    26    41  

Provision for impaired assets and closing costs, net

   8    17    0     9    8    17  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income

   2,077    1,777    1,969     2,439    2,077    1,777  

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

        

Interest expense

   (111  (108  (103   (116  (111  (108

Interest income and other, net

   88    58    145     60    88    58  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   2,054    1,727    2,011     2,383    2,054    1,727  

Provision for income taxes

   731    628    716     841    731    628  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   1,323    1,099    1,295     1,542    1,323    1,099  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (20  (13  (12   (80  (20  (13
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COSTCO

  $1,303   $1,086   $1,283    $1,462   $1,303   $1,086  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COSTCO:

        

Basic

  $2.97   $2.50   $2.95    $3.35   $2.97   $2.50  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  $2.92   $2.47   $2.89    $3.30   $2.92   $2.47  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Shares used in calculation (000’s)

        

Basic

   438,611    433,988    434,442     436,119    438,611    433,988  

Diluted

   445,970    440,454    444,240     443,094    445,970    440,454  

Dividends per share

  $0.77   $0.68   $0.61    $0.89   $0.77   $0.68  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(dollars in millions)

 

 Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive
Income
  Retained
Earnings
  Total Costco
Stockholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Equity
  

 

Common Stock

 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Retained
Earnings
  Total Costco
Stockholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Equity
 
 Shares (000’s) Amount 

BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 2, 2007

  437,013   $2   $3,118   $374   $5,132   $8,626   $67   $8,693  

Cumulative effect of adoption of guidance related to uncertain tax positions

      (6  (6   (6
                        

Adjusted balance at September 2, 2007

  437,013    2    3,118    374    5,126    8,620    67    8,687  

Comprehensive Income:

        

Net income

      1,283    1,283    12    1,295  

Foreign currency translation adjustment and other

     (90   (90  1    (89

Tax benefit on translation gain in relation to earnings subject to repatriation

     4     4    0    4  
              

Comprehensive income

       1,197    13    1,210  

Stock options exercised and vesting of restricted stock units, including income tax benefits and other

  9,299    0    363      363     363  

Conversion of convertible notes

  13    0    0        0  

Repurchase of common stock

  (13,812  0    (104   (783  (887   (887

Stock-based compensation

    166      166     166  

Cash dividends

      (265  (265  0    (265
                         Shares (000’s) Amount Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Retained
Earnings
  Total Costco
Stockholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

BALANCE AT AUGUST 31, 2008

  432,513    2    3,543    288    5,361    9,194    80    9,274    432,513   $2   

Comprehensive Income:

                

Net income

      1,086    1,086    13    1,099        1,086    1,086    13    1,099  

Unrealized gain on short-term investments, net of ($2) tax

     3     3    0    3       3     3    0    3  

Foreign currency translation adjustment and other

     (181   (181  (4  (185

Foreign-currency translation adjustment and other

     (181   (181  (4  (185
                    

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income

       908    9    917         908    9    917  

Stock options exercised and vesting of restricted stock units, including income tax benefits and other

  3,794    0    75      75     75  

Stock options exercised and release of vested restricted stock units, including tax effects

  3,794    0    75      75     75  

Conversion of convertible notes

  562    0    19      19     19    562    0    19      19     19  

Repurchase of common stock

  (895  0    (7   (50  (57   (57

Repurchases of common stock

  (895  0    (7   (50  (57   (57

Stock-based compensation

    181      181     181      181      181     181  

Cash dividends

      (296  (296   (296      (296  (296   (296

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

        (9  (9        (9  (9
                         

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

BALANCE AT AUGUST 30, 2009

  435,974    2    3,811    110    6,101    10,024    80    10,104    435,974    2    3,811    110    6,101    10,024    80    10,104  

Comprehensive Income:

                

Net income

      1,303    1,303    20    1,323        1,303    1,303    20    1,323  

Unrealized gain on short-term investments, net of ($1) tax

     3     3    0    3       3     3    0    3  

Foreign currency translation adjustment and other

     9     9    1    10  

Foreign-currency translation adjustment and other

     9     9    1    10  
                    

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income

       1,315    21    1,336         1,315    21    1,336  

Stock options exercised and vesting of restricted stock units, including income tax benefits and other

  7,461    0    205      205     205  

Stock options exercised and release of vested restricted stock units, including tax effects

  7,461    0    205      205     205  

Conversion of convertible notes

  18    0    1      1     1    18    0    1      1     1  

Repurchase of common stock

  (9,943  0    (92   (476  (568   (568

Repurchases of common stock

  (9,943  0    (92   (476  (568   (568

Stock-based compensation

    190      190     190      190      190     190  

Cash dividends

      (338  (338   (338      (338  (338   (338
                         

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

BALANCE AT AUGUST 29, 2010

  433,510   $2   $4,115   $122   $6,590   $10,829   $101   $10,930    433,510    2    4,115    122    6,590    10,829    101    10,930  

Initial consolidation of noncontrolling interest in Costco Mexico

       0    357    357  

Comprehensive Income:

        

Net income

      1,462    1,462    80    1,542  

Unrealized gain on short-term investments, net of ($1) tax

     1     1    0    1  

Foreign-currency translation adjustment and other

     250     250    24    274  
                              

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income

       1,713    104    1,817  

Stock options exercised and release of vested restricted stock units, including tax effects

  9,630    0    281      281     281  

Conversion of convertible notes

  65    0    2      2     2  

Repurchases of common stock

  (8,939  0    (89   (552  (641   (641

Stock-based compensation

    207      207     207  

Cash dividends

      (389  (389   (389

Investment by noncontrolling interest

        9    9  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

BALANCE AT AUGUST 28, 2011

  434,266   $2   $4,516   $373   $7,111   $12,002   $571   $12,573  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in millions)

 

 52 Weeks ended
August  29,

2010
 52 Weeks ended
August  30,

2009
 52 Weeks ended
August  31,

2008
  52 Weeks ended
August 28,
2011
 52 Weeks ended
August 29,
2010
 52 Weeks ended
August 30,
2009
 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net income including noncontrolling interests

 $1,323   $1,099   $1,295   $1,542   $1,323   $1,099  

Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

  795    728    653    855    795    728  

Stock-based compensation

  190    181    166    207    190    181  

Undistributed equity earnings in joint ventures

  (42  (33  (41  (1  (42  (33

Excess tax benefits on stock-based awards

  (10  (2  (41  (45  (10  (2

Other non-cash items, net

  2    46    4  

Deferred income taxes

  7    70    21  

Change in receivables, other current assets, deferred membership fees, accrued and other current liabilities

  283    142    245  

Other non-cash operating activities, net

  24    2    46  

Deferred income tax expense

  84    7    70  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the initial consolidation of Costco Mexico at the beginning of fiscal 2011:

   

Increase in merchandise inventories

  (213  (394  (192  (642  (213  (394

Increase in accounts payable

  445    255    96    804    445    255  

Other operating assets and liabilities, net

  370    283    142  
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  2,780    2,092    2,206    3,198    2,780    2,092  
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

      

Additions to property and equipment, net of $24, $20, and $21 of non-cash capital expenditures for 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively

  (1,055  (1,250  (1,599

Additions to property and equipment

  (1,290  (1,055  (1,250

Increase resulting from initial consolidation of Costco Mexico

  165    0    0  

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

  4    7    48    16    4    7  

Purchases of short-term investments

  (2,693  (1,806  (1,507  (3,276  (2,693  (1,806

Maturities of short-term investments

  1,428    1,780    1,561    2,614    1,428    1,780  

Sales of investments

  309    183    165    602    309    183  

Other investing items, net

  (8  (9  (14

Investments transferred from cash and cash equivalents

  0    (6  (371

Other investing activities, net

  (11  (8  (15
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (2,015  (1,101  (1,717  (1,180  (2,015  (1,101
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

      

Change in bank checks outstanding

  5    (22  49    (514  5    (22

Repayments of short-term borrowings

  (73  (1,777  (5,163  (105  (73  (1,777

Proceeds from short-term borrowings

  81    1,669    5,250    79    81    1,669  

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net

  0    0    103  

Repayments of long-term debt

  (84  (6  (69  0    (84  (6

Cash dividend payments

  (338  (296  (265  (389  (338  (296

Distribution to noncontrolling interests

  0    (9  0  

Investment by (distribution to) noncontrolling interests

  9    0    (9

Excess tax benefits on stock-based awards

  10    2    41    45    10    2  

Proceeds from stock-based awards, net

  193    69    306  

Proceeds from stock-based awards, net of minimum tax withholdings

  224    193    69  

Repurchases of common stock

  (551  (69  (895  (624  (551  (69

Other financing activities, net

  38    0    0    (2  38    0  
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (719  (439  (643  (1,277  (719  (439
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  11    (14  (7  54    11    (14
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  57    538    (161

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  795    57    538  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS BEGINNING OF YEAR

  3,157    2,619    2,780    3,214    3,157    2,619  
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS END OF YEAR

 $3,214   $3,157   $2,619   $4,009   $3,214   $3,157  
          

 

  

 

  

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

      

Cash paid during the year for:

      

Interest (reduced by $11, $8, and $16 interest capitalized in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively)

 $110   $104   $106  

Interest (reduced by $9, $11, and $8 interest capitalized in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively)

 $111   $110   $104  

Income taxes

 $637   $565   $615   $742   $637   $565  

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

   

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

   

(Decrease) Increase in accrued property and equipment

 $(10 $24   $20  

Common stock issued upon conversion of 3.5% Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Notes

 $1   $19   $0   $2   $1   $19  

Property acquired under capital leases

 $90   $72   $0   $0   $90   $72  

Unsettled repurchases of common stock

 $17   $0   $12   $17   $17   $0  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and subsidiaries in which it has a controlling interest, (“Costco”consolidated entities in which it has made equity investments or has other interests through which it has majority-voting control or it exercises the right to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s performance (Costco or the “Company”)Company). The Company reports its noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiariesentities as a component of equity separate from the Company’s equity. All material inter-company transactions between and among the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and other consolidated entities have been eliminated in consolidation.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance concerning whether a company’s variable interest(s) in an entity constitute a controlling financial interest. The Company adopted this guidance on August 30, 2010 (at the beginning of its fiscal year 2011). As a result of the adoption, the Company determined that its 50%-owned joint venture, Costco Mexico (Mexico), would be consolidated on a prospective basis beginning August 30, 2010. Costco operates 32 warehouses in Mexico similar to Costco warehouses operated elsewhere.

Historically, the Company accounted for its 50% interest in Mexico under the equity method of accounting. The Company’s equity method investment in Mexico included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of August 29, 2010 totaled $357, which was derecognized as part of the initial consolidation of the joint venture on August 30, 2010. Total assets and liabilities increased by approximately 3% due to the initial consolidation and the 50% noncontrolling interest in Mexico of $357 was recorded as a component of equity as a result of the initial consolidation. The initial consolidation of Mexico had no impact on net income or net income per common share attributable to Costco (Net Income). The Company’s net income excludes income attributable to noncontrolling interests in its operations in Mexico, Korea, and Taiwan. In December 2010, the Company and its 50% joint venture partner amended the Mexico joint venture agreements. As a result, the Company obtained, subject to certain continuing conditions, majority-voting control of the joint venture. As the Company had previously consolidated the joint venture, these amendments did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company operates membership warehouses that offer low prices on a limited selection of nationally branded and select private labelprivate-label products in a wide range of merchandise categories in no-frills, self-service facilities. At August 29, 2010,28, 2011, Costco operated 540592 warehouses inworldwide which included: 429 U.S. locations (in 40 U.S. states and Puerto Rico (416 locations)Rico), 82 Canadian locations (in nine Canadian provinces (79 locations)provinces), the32 Mexico locations, 22 United Kingdom (22 locations),locations, nine Japan (nine locations),locations, eight Taiwan locations, seven Korea (seven locations), Taiwan (six locations)locations, and three Australia (one location), as well as 32 locations in Mexico, through a 50%-owned joint venture.locations.

Fiscal Year End

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to August 31. References to 2011, 2010, 2009, and 20082009 relate to the 52-week fiscal years ended August 28, 2011, August 29, 2010, and August 30, 2009, and August 31, 2008, respectively.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior fiscal year amounts or balances to conform to the presentation in the current fiscal year. Additionally, as a result of the application of a new accounting pronouncement for noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, as discussed below in Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, the Company:

-

Reclassified to noncontrolling interests, a component of total equity, $80 at August 31, 2009, which was previously reported as minority interest on our consolidated balance sheet, after the correction of an immaterial error of $6 relating to the noncontrolling interest component of accumulated other comprehensive income. A new subtotal, total Costco stockholders’ equity, refers to the equity attributable to stockholders of Costco;

-

Reported as separate captions within our consolidated statements of income, net income including noncontrolling interests, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and net income attributable to Costco;

-

Utilized net income including noncontrolling interests, as the starting point on our consolidated statements of cash flows in order to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interests to cash flows from operating activities; and

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

-

Reported separately within our consolidated statements of equity and comprehensive income, distributions and cumulative balances attributable to noncontrolling interests.

These reclassifications did not have a material impact on the Company’s previously reported consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers as cash and cash equivalents all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase and proceeds due from credit and debit card transactions with settlement terms of less than one week. Credit and debit card receivables were $862$982 and $758$862 at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively.

Short-term Investments

In general, short-term investments have a maturity of three months to five years at the date of purchase. Investments with maturities beyond five years may be classified, based on the Company’s determination, as short-term based on their highly liquid nature and because such marketable securities represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations. Short-term investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value using the specific identification method with the unrealized gains and losses reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income until realized. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, if any, are determined on a specific identification basis and all are recorded in interest income and other, net in the consolidated statements of income. Short-term investments classified as held-to-maturity are financial instruments that the Company has the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported net of any related amortization and are not remeasured to fair value on a recurring basis.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature or variable interest rates. See Notes 2, 3, and 4 for the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s investments, derivative instruments, and fixed rate debt.

The Company follows the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements relating to financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities, including the presentation of required disclosures, in its consolidated financial statements. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires maximizing the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used are:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The following valuation techniques are used to measure fair value:

Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments, such as money market mutual funds, whose value is based on quoted market prices, such as quoted net asset values published by the fund as supported in an active market, exchange-traded instruments and listed equities.

Level 2 includes assets and liabilities where quoted market prices are unobservable but observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities, or could be obtained from data providers or pricing vendors. The Company’s Level 2 assets and liabilities primarily include United States (U.S.) government and agency securities, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured corporate bonds, investments in corporate notes and bonds, asset and mortgage-backed securities, and forward foreign exchange contracts. Valuation methodologies are based on “consensus pricing,” using market prices from a variety of industry-standard independent data providers or pricing that considers various assumptions, including time value, yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures. All are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, for which the Company typically receives independent external valuation information.

Level 3 is comprised of significant unobservable inputs for valuations from the Company’s independent data and a primary pricing vendor that are also supported by little, infrequent, or no market activity. Management considers indicators of significant unobservable inputs such as the lengthening of maturities, later-than-scheduled payments, and any remaining individual securities that have otherwise matured, as indicators of Level 3. Assets and liabilities are considered Level 3 when their fair value inputs are unobservable, unavailable or management concludes that even though there may be some observable inputs, an item should be classified as a Level 3 based on other indicators of significant unobservable inputs, such as situations involving limited market activity, where determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company utilizes the services of a primary pricing vendor, which does not provide access to its proprietary valuation models, inputs and assumptions. While the Company is not provided access to proprietary models of the vendor, the Company reviewed and contrasted pricing received with other pricing sources to ensure accuracy of each asset class for which prices are provided. The Company’s review also included an examination of the underlying inputs and assumptions for a sample of individual securities across asset classes, credit rating levels and various durations, a process that is continually performed for each reporting period. In addition, the pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all security valuations, which facilitates identification and resolution of potentially erroneous prices. The Company believes that the prices received from the primary pricing vendor are representative of exit prices in accordance with authoritative guidance, and are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy.

Our current financial liabilities have fair values that approximate their carrying values. Our long-term financial liabilities consist of long-term debt, which is recorded on the balance sheet at issuance price less unamortized discount.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Receivables, net

Receivables consist of the following at the end of 20102011 and 2009:2010:

 

  2010 2009   2011 2010 

Vendor receivables, and other

  $448   $418    $487   $448  

Reinsurance receivables

   196    169     201    196  

Receivables from governmental entities

   98    64  

Other receivables

   103    82     96    103  

Third-party pharmacy receivables

   75    73     86    75  

Receivables from governmental entities

   64    95  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (2  (3   (3  (2
         

 

  

 

 

Receivables, net

  $884   $834  

Receivables, Net

  $965   $884  
         

 

  

 

 

Vendor receivables include payments from vendors in the form of volume rebates or other purchase discounts that are evidenced by signed agreements and are reflected in the carrying value of the inventory when earned or as the Company progresses towards earning the rebate or discount and as a component of merchandise costs as the merchandise is sold. Vendor receivable balances are generally presented on a gross basis separate from any related payable due. In certain circumstances, these receivables may be settled against the related payable to that vendor. Other consideration received from vendors is generally recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs upon completion of contractual milestones, terms of the related agreement, or by other systematic approach.

Reinsurance receivables are held by the Company’s wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary. The receivable balance represents amounts ceded through reinsurance arrangements, and are reflected on a gross basis, separate from the amounts assumed under reinsurance, which are presented on a gross basis within other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—SummaryReceivables from governmental entities largely consists of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

various tax related items.

Third-party pharmacy receivables generally relate to amounts due from members’ insurance companies for the amount above their co-pay, which is collected at the point-of-sale.

Amounts are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical experience and application of the specific identification method.

Vendor Receivables and Allowances

Periodic payments from vendors in the form Write-offs of volume rebatesreceivables were immaterial for fiscal years 2011, 2010, or other purchase discounts that are evidenced by signed agreements are reflected in the carrying value of the inventory when earned or as the Company progresses towards earning the rebate or discount and as a component of merchandise costs as the merchandise is sold. Other consideration received from vendors is generally recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs upon completion of contractual milestones, terms of the related agreement, or by other systematic approach.2009.

Merchandise Inventories

Merchandise inventories consist of the following at the end of 2011 and 2010:

   2011   2010 

United States (primarily LIFO)

  $4,548    $4,150  

Foreign (FIFO)

   2,090     1,488  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Merchandise Inventories

  $6,638    $5,638  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, as determined primarily by the retail inventory method, and are stated using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for substantially all U.S. merchandise inventories. Merchandise inventories for all foreign operations are primarily valued by the retail inventory method and are stated using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company believes the LIFO method more fairly presents the results of operations by more closely matching current costs with current revenues. The Company records an adjustment each quarter, if necessary, for the estimated effect of inflation or deflation, and these estimates are adjusted to actual results determined at year-end.

AtDue to inflation in 2011, the end of 2008, due to overall net inflationary trends, merchandise inventories valued at LIFO were lower than the FIFO value, resulting in a $32 charge to merchandise costs.costs of $87. During 2009, due to overall net deflationary trends, the Company recorded a $32 benefit to merchandise costs to adjust inventories valued at LIFO. At the end of 2010, and 2009, merchandise inventories valued at LIFO approximated FIFO after considering the lower of cost or market principle.

   2010   2009 

Merchandise inventories consist of:

    

United States (primarily LIFO)

  $4,150    $4,080  

Foreign (FIFO)

   1,488     1,325  
          

Total

  $5,638    $5,405  
          

The Company provides for estimated inventory losses between physical inventory counts as a percentage of net sales, using estimates based on the Company’s experience. The provision is adjusted periodically to reflect the results of the actual physical inventory counts, which generally occur in the second and fourth fiscal quarters of the fiscal year. Inventory cost, where appropriate, is reduced by estimates of vendor rebates when earned or as the Company progresses towards earning those rebates, provided that they are probable and reasonably estimable.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. In general, new building additions are separated into components, each with its own estimated useful life. Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives or the lease term, if shorter. Leasehold improvements incurred after the beginning of the initial lease term are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the initial lease plus any renewals that are reasonably assured at the date the leasehold improvement is made.

Estimated useful lives for financial reporting purposes are as follows:

 

   Years

Buildings and improvements

  5 - 50

Equipment and fixtures

  3 - 20

Repair and maintenance costs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for remodels, refurbishments and improvements that add to or change the way an asset functions or that extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Assets that were removed during the remodel, refurbishment or improvement are retired. When assets are retired or sold, the asset costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated, with any remaining gain or loss recorded.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when management makes the decision to relocaterelocating or closeclosing a warehouse or when events or changes in circumstances occur that may indicate the carrying amount of the asset group, generally an individual warehouse, may not be fully recoverable. For asset groups

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

to be held and used, including warehouses to be relocated, the carrying value of the asset group is considered recoverable when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset group exceed the group’s net carrying value. In the event that the carrying value is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss would be recognized for the asset group to be held and used asequal to the excess of the carrying amount overvalue above the estimated fair value of the asset group. For asset groups classified as held for sale (disposal group), the carrying value is compared to the disposal group’s fair value less costs to sell. The Company estimates fair value by obtaining market appraisals from third party brokers or other valuation techniques. In 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008,2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1, $2, and $11, respectively, included in provision for impaired assets and $10, respectively.closing costs, net and interest income and other in the consolidated statements of income. In 2009, the charge was primarily related to the closure of its two Costco Home locations in July 2009. In 2008, the charge was primarily related to an on-site relocation

Assets classified as held for sale were not material as of a warehouse that was demolished, rebuilt, and reopened in early 2009.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

August 28, 2011 or August 29, 2010.

Other Assets

Other assets consist of the following at the end of 20102011 and 2009:2010:

 

  2010   2009   2011   2010 

Investment in Costco Mexico

  $357    $319  

Prepaid rents, lease costs, and long-term deposits

   186     170    $211    $186  

Tax-related assets

   179     18  

Goodwill, net

   71     71     74     71  

Cash surrender value of life insurance

   65     73     64     65  

Other

   60     50     95     96  

Notes receivable

   54     56  

Long-term investments

   0     3  

Investment in Mexico

   0     357  
          

 

   

 

 

Other Assets

  $793    $742    $623    $793  
          

 

   

 

 

The Company's investments in CostcoAs previously discussed, the Company began consolidating Mexico and in other unconsolidated joint ventures that are less than majority owned are accounted for underat the equity method. The equity in earningsbeginning of Costco Mexico is included in interest income and other in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, and for 2010, 2009, and 2008, was $41, $32, and $41, respectively.2011, on a prospective basis. The amount of retained earnings that representsrepresented undistributed earnings of Costco Mexico was $307 and $266 at the end of 2010. The Company did not make any capital contributions to its investment in Mexico in 2010 and 2009, respectively.or 2009. The investments and equity in earnings of other unconsolidated joint ventures are not material. The Company did not make any capital contributions to its investment

Tax-related assets represent amounts deposited with taxing authorities in Costco Mexico in 2010, 2009, or 2008.connection with ongoing income tax audits and the Company’s long term deferred tax assets.

Goodwill resulting from certain business combinations is reviewed for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more frequently if circumstances dictate. No impairment of goodwill has been incurred to date.

The Company adjusts the carrying value of its employee life insurance contracts to the net cash surrender value at the end of each reporting period.

Notes receivable generally represent amounts due from cities over a number

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of years, representing incentive amounts granted to the Company when a new location was opened, or for the repayment of certain infrastructure initially paid for by the Company.Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Accounts Payable

The Company’s banking system provides for the daily replenishment of major bank accounts as checks are presented. Accordingly, included in accounts payable at the end of 2011 and 2010 are $108 and 2009 are $617, and $611, respectively, representing the excess of outstanding checks over cash on deposit at the banks on which the checks were drawn.

Insurance/Self InsuranceSelf-Insurance Liabilities

The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance mechanisms, including a wholly-owned captive insurance entity and participation in a reinsurance program, to provide for potential liabilities for workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage, directordirectors and officers’officers liability,

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

vehicle liability, and employee health care benefits. The reinsurance agreement is one year in duration and new agreements are entered into by each participant at their discretion at the commencement of the next fiscal year. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are not discounted and are estimated, in part, by considering historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors, and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. As of the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, these insurance liabilities ofwere $595 and $541 in the aggregate, respectively, and $500, respectively, were included in accounts payable, accrued salaries and benefits, and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, classified based on their nature.

The Company’s wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary (the captive) receives direct premiums, which are netted against the Company’s premium costs in selling, general and administrative expenses, in the consolidated statements of income. The captive participates in a reinsurance program that includes other third-party members. The member agreements and practices of the reinsurance program limit any participating members’ individual risk. Both revenues and costs are presented in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Income statement adjustments related to the reinsurance program and related impacts to the consolidated balance sheets are recognized as information becomes known. In the event the Company leaves the reinsurance program, the Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholders for activity prior to the termination of the annual agreement.

Other Current Liabilities

Other current liabilities consist of the following at the end of 20102011 and 2009:2010:

 

   2010   2009 

2% reward liability

  $522    $456  

Insurance-related liabilities

   263     241  

Cash card liability

   100     93  

Other current liabilities

   87     84  

Tax-related liabilities

   79     54  

Sales and vendor consideration liabilities

   77     68  

Deferred sales

   77     65  

Sales return reserve

   72     79  

Interest payable

   51     51  
          

Other Current Liabilities

  $1,328    $1,191  
          

Derivatives

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of its business, which the Company manages, in part, through the use of forward foreign exchange contracts, seeking to hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on known future expenditures denominated in a foreign currency. The contracts are intended primarily to hedge U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures. Currently, these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The Company seeks to mitigate risk with the use of these contracts and does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. The aggregate notional amount of forward foreign exchange contracts was $225 and $183 at the end of 2010 and 2009, respectively. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features.

   2011   2010 

Accrued member rewards

  $602    $522  

Insurance-related liabilities

   276     263  

Tax-related liabilities

   122     79  

Cash card liability

   112     100  

Deferred sales

   141     98  

Other current liabilities

   96     86  

Vendor consideration liabilities

   66     57  

Sales return reserve

   74     72  

Interest payable

   51     51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Current Liabilities

  $1,540    $1,328  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

Derivatives

The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of business. The Company manages these fluctuations, in part, through the use of forward foreign-exchange contracts, seeking to economically hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on known future expenditures denominated in a foreign-currency. The contracts are intended primarily to economically hedge exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries or other entities whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The Company seeks to mitigate risk with the use of these contracts and does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features. The aggregate notional amounts of forward foreign-exchange contracts were $247 and $225 at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company seeks to manage the counterparty risk associated with these contracts by limiting transactions to counterparties with which the Company has an established banking relationship. There can be no assurance, however, that this practice effectively mitigates counterparty risk. The contracts are limited to less than one year.year in duration. See Note 3 for information on the fair value of these contracts.open, unsettled forward foreign-exchange contracts as of August 28, 2011, and August 29, 2010.

The following table summarizes the amount of net gainforeign-currency transaction gains or (loss)losses recognized in interest income and other, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income:income relating to forward foreign-exchange contracts were nominal in 2011, 2010 and 2009. These gains and losses are largely offset by the impact of revaluing related foreign currency denominated payables, which are also recognized in interest income and other, net.

   2010   2009  2008 

Forward foreign exchange contracts

  $1    $(5 $6  
              

The Company is exposed to risks due to fluctuations in prices for the energy prices,it consumes, particularly electricity and natural gas, which it seeks to partially mitigate through the use of fixed-price contracts for approximately 26%36% of its warehouses and other facilities, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. The Company also enters into variable-priced derivative contracts for some purchases of natural gas, in addition to fuel for its gas stations, on an index basis. These contracts meet the characteristics of derivative instruments, but generally qualify for treatment as normalthe “normal purchases or normal salessales” exception under authoritative guidance and thus require no mark-to-market adjustment.

Foreign Currency TranslationForeign-Currency

The functional currencies of the Company’s international subsidiaries are the local currency of the country in which the subsidiary is located. Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies as well as the Company’s investment in Costco Mexico, are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Revenues and expenses of the Company’s consolidated foreign operations are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Gains

The Company recognizes foreign-currency transaction gains and losses on foreignrelated to revaluing all monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, transactions are includedgenerally the U.S. dollar payables of consolidated subsidiaries to their functional currency, in interest income and other, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. These gains and losses were $8 and $13 in 2011 and 2010, respectively and not significant in 2009 or 2008.2009.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

The Company generally recognizes sales, net of estimated returns, at the time the member takes possession of merchandise or receives services. When the Company collects payments from customers prior to the transfer of ownership of merchandise or the performance of services, the amounts received are generally recorded as deferred revenuesales included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets until the sale or service is completed. The Company providesreserves for estimated sales returns based on historical trends in merchandise returns.returns, net of the estimated net realizable value of merchandise inventories to be returned and any estimated disposition costs. Amounts collected from members, which under common trade practices are referred to as sales taxes, are recorded on a net basis.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The Company evaluates whether it is appropriate to record the gross amount of merchandise sales and related costs or the net amount earned as commissions. Generally, when Costco is the primary obligor, is subject to inventory risk, has latitude in establishing prices and selecting suppliers, can influence product or service specifications, or has several but not all of these indicators, revenue is recorded on a gross basis. If the Company is not the primary obligor and does not possess other indicators of gross reporting as noted above, it records the net amounts as commissions earned, which is reflected in net sales.

Membership fee revenue represents annual membership fees paid by substantially all of the Company’s members. The Company accounts for membership fee revenue, net of estimated refunds, on a deferred basis, whereby revenue is recognized ratably over the one-year membership period. As previously disclosed, effective with renewals occurring on and after March 1, 2009, the Company changed an element of its membership renewal policy. Memberships renewed within two months after expiration of the current membership year are extended for twelve months from the expiration date. (Under the previous policy, renewals within six months of the expiration date were extended for twelve months from the expiration date.) Memberships renewed more than two months after such expiration date are extended for twelve months from the renewal date. This change has had an immaterial effect of deferring recognition of certain membership fees paid by late-renewing members.

The Company’s Executive Members qualify for a 2% reward (up to a maximum of approximately five hundred dollars per year on qualified purchases made at Costco), which can be redeemed at Costco warehouses. The Company accounts for this 2% reward as a reduction in sales, with the related accrued member rewards liability being classified withinincluded in other current liabilities.liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The sales reduction and corresponding liability are computed after giving effect to the estimated impact of non-redemptions based on historical data. The net reduction in sales was $790, $688, and $610 in 2011, 2010, and $571 in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

Merchandise Costs

Merchandise costs consist of the purchase price of inventory sold, inbound shipping charges and all costs related to the Company’s depot operations, including freight from depots to selling warehouses, and are reduced by vendor consideration received.consideration. Merchandise costs also include salaries, benefits and depreciation on production equipment in certain fresh foods and ancillary departments.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and workers’ compensation costs for warehouse employees, other than fresh foods departments and certain ancillary businesses, as well as all regional and home office employees, including buying personnel. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include utilities, bank charges, rent and substantially all building and equipment depreciation, as well as other operating costs incurred to support warehouse operations.

Marketing and Promotional Expenses

Costco'sCostco’s policy is generally to limit marketing and promotional expenses to new warehouse openings, occasional direct mail marketing to prospective new members and direct mail marketing programs to

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

existing members promoting selected merchandise. Marketing and promotional costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation expense for all stock-based awards granted is recognized using the straight-line method. The fair value of restricted stock units (RSUs) is calculated as the market value of the common stock on the measurement date less the present value of the expected dividends forgone during the vesting period. The fair value of stock options is measured using the Black-Scholes valuation model. While options and RSUs granted to employees generally vest over five years, all grants allow for either daily or quarterly vesting of the pro-rata number of stock-based awards that would vest on the next anniversary of the grant date in the event of retirement or voluntary termination. The historical experience rate of actual forfeitures has been minimal. As such, the Company does not reduce stock-based compensation for an estimate of forfeitures because the estimate is inconsequential in light of historical experience and considering the awards vest on either a daily or quarterly basis. The impact of actual forfeitures arising in the event of involuntary termination is recognized as actual forfeitures occur, which generally has been infrequent. Stock options have a ten-year term. Stock-based compensation expense is predominately included in merchandise costs and selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income. See Note 7 for additional information on the Company’s stock-based compensation plans.

Leases

The Company leases land and/or buildings at warehouses and certain other office and distribution facilities primarily under operating leases. Operating leases expire at various dates through 2051, with the exception of one lease in the Company’s United Kingdom subsidiary, which expires in 2151. These leases generally contain one or more of the following options which the Company can exercise at the end of the initial lease term: (a) renewal of the lease for a defined number of years at the then-fair market rental rate or rate stipulated in the lease agreement; (b) purchase of the property at the then-fair market value; or (c) right of first refusal in the event of a third party purchase offer.

The Company accounts for its lease expense with free rent periods and step-rent provisions on a straight-line basis over the original term of the lease, from the date the Company has control of the

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

property. Certain leases provide for periodic rental increases based on the price indices, and some of the leases provide for rents based on the greater of minimum guaranteed amounts or sales volume.

The Company has entered into four capital leases for warehouse locations, expiring at various dates through 2040. Capital lease assets are included in buildings and improvements in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amortization expense on capital lease assets is recorded as depreciation expense and is predominately included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Capital lease liabilities are recorded at the lesser of the estimated fair market value of the leased property or the net present value of the aggregate future minimum lease payments and are included in other current liabilities and other liabilities. Interest on these obligations is included in interest expense.

Preopening Expenses

Preopening expenses related to new warehouses, new regional offices and other startup operations are expensed as incurred.

Provision for Impaired Assets and Closing Costs, Net

Warehouse closing costs incurred relate principally to expenses associated with the Company’s relocation of certain warehouses (that were not otherwise impaired) to larger and better-located facilities. The provisions for 2011, 2010, 2009, and 20082009 included charges in the amounts indicated below:

 

  2010   2009   2008   2011   2010   2009 

Warehouse closing expenses

  $6    $9    $9    $8    $6    $9  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   2     8     10     1     2     8  

Net gains on sale of real property

   0     0     (19
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $8    $17    $0  

Provision for Impaired Assets and Closing Costs, Net

  $9    $8    $17  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

Warehouse closing expenses primarily relate to accelerated building depreciation based on the shortened useful life through the expected closing date and remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease income, for leased locations. At the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, the Company’s reserve for warehouse closing costs was $5 and primarily related to estimated future lease obligations.obligations and other estimated contractual obligations associated with exiting the properties.

Interest Income and Other, Net

Interest income and other, net includes:

   2011   2010   2009 

Interest income, net

  $41    $23    $27  

Earnings of affiliates and other, net

   19     65     31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest Income and Other, Net

  $60    $88    $58  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As previously discussed, Costco began consolidating Mexico at the beginning of 2011, on a prospective basis. For 2010 and 2009, the equity in earnings of Mexico is included in interest income and other, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, and was $41 and $32, respectively.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature or variable interest rates. See Notes 2, 3, and 4 for the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s investments, derivative instruments, and fixed rate debt.

The Company follows the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements relating to financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities, including presentation of required disclosures, in its consolidated financial statements. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires maximizing the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used are:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The following valuation techniques are used to measure fair value:

Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments, such as money market mutual funds, whose value is based on quoted market prices, such as quoted net asset values published by the fund as supported in an active market, exchange-traded instruments and listed equities.

Level 2 includes assets and liabilities where quoted market prices are unobservable but observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities, could be obtained from data providers or pricing vendors. The Company’s Level 2 assets and liabilities primarily include United States (U.S.) government and agency securities, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured corporate bonds, investments in corporate notes and bonds, asset and mortgage-backed securities, and forward foreign exchange contracts. Valuation methodologies are based on “consensus pricing,” using market prices from a variety of industry-standard independent data providers or pricing that considers various assumptions, including time value, yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures. All are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, for which the Company typically receives independent external valuation information.

Level 3 is comprised of significant unobservable inputs for valuations from the Company’s independent data and a primary pricing vendor that are also supported by little, infrequent, or no market activity. Management considers indicators of significant unobservable inputs such as the lengthening of maturities, later-than-scheduled payments, and any remaining individual securities that have otherwise matured, as indicators of Level 3. Assets and liabilities are considered Level 3 when their fair value

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

inputs are unobservable, unavailable or management concludes that even though there may be some observable inputs, an item should be classified as a Level 3 based on other indicators of significant unobservable inputs, such as situations involving limited market activity, where determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company utilizes the services of a primary pricing vendor, which does not provide access to their proprietary valuation models, inputs and assumptions. While the Company is not provided access to proprietary models of the vendor, the Company reviewed and contrasted pricing received with other pricing sources to ensure accuracy of each asset class for which prices are provided. The Company’s review also included an examination of the underlying inputs and assumptions for a sample of individual securities across asset classes, credit rating levels and various durations, a process that is continually performed for each reporting period. In addition, the pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all security valuations, which facilitates identification and resolution of potentially erroneous prices. The Company believes that the prices received from the primary pricing vendor are representative of exit prices in accordance with authoritative guidance, and are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy.

Interest Income and Other, Net

Interest income and other, net includes:

   2010   2009   2008 

Earnings of affiliates and other, net

  $65    $31    $49  

Interest income, net

   23     27     96  
               

Interest Income and Other, Net

  $88    $58    $145  
               

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

The Company periodically evaluates unrealized losses in its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment using both qualitative and quantitative criteria. In the event a security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company recognizes the credit loss component in interest income and other, net in the consolidated financial statements.statements of income. The Company generally only invests in debt securities.

Income Taxes

Effective September 3, 2007, the Company adopted authoritative guidance related to uncertain tax positions, which clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements. This guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The cumulative impact of the initial adoption of this guidance was to decrease the beginning balance of retained earnings and to increase the Company’s liability for uncertain tax positions and related interest by a corresponding amount.

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credits and loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

The determination of the Company’s provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items and the probability of sustaining uncertain tax positions. The benefits of uncertain tax positions are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the uncertain tax positions will withstand challenge, if any, from tax authorities. When facts and circumstances change, the Company reassessreassesses these probabilities and records any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate. See Note 9 for additional information.

Net Income Attributable to Costco (Net Income) per Common Share

The computation of basic net income per share uses the weighted average number of shares that were outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net income per share uses the weighted average number of shares in the basic net income per share calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise and vesting of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding using the treasury stock method for shares subject to stock options and restricted stock units and the “if converted” method for the convertible note securities.

Stock Repurchase Programs

Shares repurchasedRepurchased shares of common stock are retired, in accordance with the Washington Business Corporation Act. The par value of repurchased shares is deducted from common stock and the excess repurchase price over par value is deducted from additional paid-in capital and retained earnings. See Note 6 for additional information.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010,As discussed above in Note 1, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance on disclosure of subsequent events, eliminating the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. The Company adopted this guidance in its second quarter of fiscal 2010.

In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance to amend the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires disclosureconsolidation of transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers and information on purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements on a gross basis (as opposed to a net basis) in the reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured under Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy. The guidance is effective for annual and interimvariable interest entities.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 (on a gross basis) reconciliation disclosures, which are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this guidance at the beginning of its third quarter of fiscal 2010, except for the Level 3 reconciliation disclosures on the roll-forward activities, which it will adopt at the beginning of its third quarter of fiscal 2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, adoption of this guidance did not have and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance establishing the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative GAAP (other than guidance issued by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)) to be used in the preparation of financial statements. The Company adopted these requirements at the beginning of its fiscal year 2010, as reflected in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2008, the FASB issued amended guidance surrounding the adoption of fair value measurements. The amendment allowed for an elected deferral of the adoption for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company elected to defer adoption at the time of the amendment. The Company adopted the requirements for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities in its financial statements at the beginning of its fiscal year 2010. The adoption did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that changed the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance requires noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of equity separate from the parent’s equity and purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control to be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to a noncontrolling interest is to be included in net income and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, is to be recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in net income. The Company adopted these new requirements at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal 2010. In January 2010, the FASB issued additional guidance on this topic, which clarifies the types of transactions that should be accounted for as a decrease in ownership of a subsidiary. The Company retrospectively adopted these new requirements at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal 2010, as required. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance on business combinations. This guidance retains the fundamental requirements of the acquisition method of accounting (formerly the purchase method) to account for all business combinations. However, it requires the reporting entity in a business combination to recognize all identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. It establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective, and requires the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value and the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. The Company is subject to these requirements as of the beginning of its fiscal year 2010 in the event of a business combination.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance on revenue recognition for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. Under this guidance, when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling-price method. This guidance also prescribes new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. The guidance is effective for revenue arrangements entered into for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company will adoptadopted this guidance at the beginning of its fiscal year 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard todid not have a material impact on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009,January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance concerning whether variable interests constitute controllingto amend the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers. Under Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, the guidance requires disclosure of information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis (as opposed to a net basis) in the reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured. The Company adopted this guidance at the beginning of its third quarter of fiscal 2010, except for the Level 3 reconciliation disclosures on the roll-forward activities, which were adopted at the beginning of its third quarter of fiscal 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial interests. Thisstatement disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend the requirements related to fair value measurement which changes the wording used to describe many requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. Additionally, the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. The amended guidance is effective for the firstinterim and annual reporting period that beginsperiods beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2009.2011, and is applied prospectively. The Company willplans to adopt this guidance at the beginning of its third quarter of fiscal year 2012. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statement disclosure.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, an entity will be required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other comprehensive income or to present the information in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance must be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. AsThe Company plans to adopt this guidance at the beginning of its third quarter of fiscal 2012. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a resultmaterial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and will impact the financial statements’ presentation only.

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend and simplify the rules related to testing goodwill for impairment. The revised guidance allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation, based on the entity’s events and circumstances, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine whether it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. The new

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption theis permitted. The Company will begin consolidating its 50%-owned joint venture, Costco Mexico on a prospective basis. Costco Mexico operates 32 warehouses similar in format and merchandise offeringsplans to Costco warehouses operated world-wide. Historically, the Company accountedearly adopt this guidance for its interest in Costco Mexico under the equity method. Consolidationfiscal year 2012 annual impairment test. Adoption of Costco Mexicothis guidance is not expected to increase total assets, liabilities, and revenue by approximately 3%, with nohave a material impact on net income attributable to Costco.the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 2—Investments

The major classescategories of the Company’s investments are as follows:

Money market mutual funds:funds

The Company invests in money funds that seek to maintain a net asset value of par, while limiting overall exposure to credit, market, and liquidity risks.

U.S. government and agency securities:securities

These U.S. government-secured debt instruments are publically traded and valued. Losses in this category are primarily due to market liquidity and interest rate reductions.

Corporate notes and bonds:bonds

The Company evaluates its corporate debt securities based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, the credit rating of the issuer. The vast majority of the Company’s corporate debt securities are rated investment grade by the major rating agencies.

FDIC insuredFDIC-insured corporate bonds:bonds

These bonds are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government under the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Losses in this category are primarily due to market liquidity and interest rate reductions.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 2—Investments (Continued)

Asset and mortgage-backed securities:securities

The vast majority of the Company’s asset and mortgage-backed securities have investment grade credit ratings from the major rating agencies. These investments are collateralized by residential real estate, credit, credit card receivables, commercial real estate, foreign mortgage receivables, and lease receivables. Estimates of fair value are based upon a variety of factors including, but not limited to, credit rating of the issuer, internal credit risk, interest rate variation, prepayment assumptions, and the potential for default.

Certificates of deposit:deposit

Certificate of deposits are short-term interest-bearing debt instruments issued by various financial institutions with which the Company has an established banking relationship.

The Company’s investments at the end of 2010 and 2009, were as follows:

2010:

  Cost
Basis
   Unrealized
Gains
   Unrealized
Losses
   Recorded
Basis
 

Available-for-sale:

        

U.S. government and agency securities

  $1,222    $7    $0    $1,229  

Corporate notes and bonds

   10     1     0     11  

FDIC insured corporate bonds

   139     0     0     139  

Asset and mortgage-backed securities

   23     0     0     23  
                    

Total available-for-sale

   1,394     8     0     1,402  

Held-to-maturity:

        

Certificates of deposit

   133         133  
                    

Total investments

  $1,527    $8    $0    $1,535  
                    

2009:

  Cost
Basis
   Unrealized
Gains
   Unrealized
Losses
  Recorded
Basis
 

Available-for-sale:

       

Money market mutual funds

  $13    $0    $0   $13  

U.S. government and agency securities

   400     3     0    403  

Corporate notes and bonds

   49     1     (1  49  

Asset and mortgage-backed securities(1)

   48     1     0    49  
                   

Total available-for-sale

   510     5     (1  514  

Held-to-maturity:

       

Certificates of deposit

   59        59  
     ��             

Total investments

  $569    $5    $(1 $573  
                   

(1)

At the end of 2009, $3 was recorded in other assets, reflecting the timing of the expected distributions.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 2—Investments (Continued)

 

The Company’s investments at the end of 2011 and 2010, were as follows:

2011:

  Cost
Basis
   Unrealized
Gains
   Unrealized
Losses
   Recorded
Basis
 

Available-for-sale:

        

U.S. government and agency securities

  $1,096    $8    $0    $1,104  

Corporate notes and bonds

   6     1     0     7  

FDIC-insured corporate bonds

   208     1     0     209  

Asset and mortgage-backed securities

   12     0     0     12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale

   1,322     10     0     1,332  

Held-to-maturity:

        

Certificates of deposit

   272         272  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investments

  $1,594    $10    $0    $1,604  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2010:

  Cost
Basis
   Unrealized
Gains
   Unrealized
Losses
   Recorded
Basis
 

Available-for-sale:

        

U.S. government and agency securities

  $1,222    $7    $0    $1,229  

Corporate notes and bonds

   10     1     0     11  

FDIC-insured corporate bonds

   139     0     0     139  

Asset and mortgage-backed securities

   23     0     0     23  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale

   1,394     8     0     1,402  

Held-to-maturity:

        

Certificates of deposit

   133         133  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investments

  $1,527    $8    $0    $1,535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross unrealized gains and losses on cash equivalents were not material at August 28, 2011 and August 29, 2010.

The proceeds and gross realized gains and losses from sales of available-for-sale securities during 2011, 2010, 2009, and 20082009 are provided in the following table:

 

  2010   2009   2008   2011   2010   2009 

Proceeds

  $309    $183    $165    $602    $309    $183  

Realized gains

   5     5     2     1     5     5  

Realized losses

   1     2     0     0     1     2  

In 2008, one of the Company’s enhanced money fund investments, Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio Fund (Columbia), ceased accepting cash redemption requests and changed to a floating net asset value. In light of the restricted liquidity, the Company elected to receive a pro-rata allocation of the underlying securities in a separately managed account and reclassified this fund from cash and cash equivalents to short-term investments and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company assessed the fair value of these securities through market quotations and review of current investment ratings, as available, coupled with an evaluation of the liquidation value of each investment and its current performance in meeting scheduled payments of principal and interest. During 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company recognized $0, $12 and $5, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairment losses related to thesecertain enhanced money fund investment securities, which were included in interest income and other, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. At the end of 2010, the Company no longer held any of these securities.

The maturities At the end of 2011 and 2010 the Company’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at August 29, 2010 are as follows:that were in continuous unrealized-loss position were insignificant.

   Available-For-Sale   Held-To-Maturity 
   Cost Basis   Fair Value   Cost Basis   Fair Value 

Due in one year or less

  $711    $712    $133    $133  

Due after one year through five years

   677     684     0     0  

Due after five years

   6     6     0     0  
                    
  $1,394    $1,402    $133    $133  
                    

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 2—Investments (Continued)

The maturities of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at August 28, 2011 were as follows:

   Available-For-Sale   Held-To-Maturity 
   Cost Basis   Fair Value   Cost Basis   Fair Value 

Due in one year or less

  $890    $892    $272    $272  

Due after one year through five years

   426     433     0     0  

Due after five years

   6     7     0     0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,322    $1,332    $272    $272  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 3—Fair Value Measurement

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The tables below present information at the end of2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively, regarding the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and indicatesindicate the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value:value. As of these dates, the Company’s holdings of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities were immaterial.

 

2010:

  Level 1   Level 2 Level 3 

2011:

  Level 1   Level 2 

Money market mutual funds(1)

  $1,514    $0   $0    $200    $0  

Investment in U.S. government and agency securities(3)

   0     1,229    0     0     1,177  

Investment in corporate notes and bonds

   0     11    0     0     7  

Investment in FDIC insured corporate notes

   0     139    0  

Investment in FDIC-insured corporate bonds

   0     209  

Investment in asset and mortgage-backed securities

   0     23    0     0     12  

Forward foreign exchange contracts, in asset position(2)

   0     1    0  

Forward foreign exchange contracts, in (liability) position(2)

   0     (3  0  

Forward foreign-exchange contracts, in asset position(2)

   0     1  

Forward foreign-exchange contracts, in (liability) position(2)

   0     (2
             

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,514    $1,400   $0    $200    $1,404  
             

 

   

 

 

 

2009:

  Level 1   Level 2 Level 3 

2010:

  Level 1   Level 2 

Money market mutual funds(1)

  $1,597    $0   $0    $1,514    $0  

Investment in U.S. government and agency securities

   0     403    0     0     1,229  

Investment in corporate notes and bonds

   0     35    14     0     11  

Investment in FDIC-insured corporate bonds

   0     139  

Investment in asset and mortgage-backed securities

   0     37    12     0     23  

Forward foreign exchange contracts, in asset position(2)

   0     2    0  

Forward foreign exchange contracts, in (liability) position(2)

   0     (4  0  

Forward foreign-exchange contracts, in asset position(2)

   0     1  

Forward foreign-exchange contracts, in (liability) position(2)

   0     (3
             

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,597    $473   $26    $1,514    $1,400  
             

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

(2)

The asset and the liability values are included in deferred income taxes and other current assets and other current liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 1 for additional information on derivative instruments.

(3)

$73 and $1,104 included in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 3—Fair Value Measurement (Continued)

 

The tables below provide a summary of the changesChanges in fair value, including net transfers, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) forduring 2011 and 2010 and 2009:were immaterial.

2010

  Investment
in corporate
notes and
bonds
  Investment
in asset and
mortgage-
backed
securities
  Total 

Balance, beginning of period

  $14   $12   $26  

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):

    

Included in other comprehensive income

   0    2    2  

Purchases, issuances, and (settlements)

   (14  (14  (28
             

Balance, end of period

  $0   $0   $0  
             

2009

  Investment
in
corporate

notes and
bonds
  Investment
in asset
and

mortgage-
backed
securities
  Total 

Balance, beginning of period

  $12   $6   $18  

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):

    

Included in other comprehensive income

   0    3    3  

Included in interest income and other, net

   (4  (6  (10

Purchases, issuances, and (settlements)

   (17  (23  (40

Net transfers in

   23    32    55  
             

Balance, end of period

  $14   $12   $26  
             

Change in unrealized (losses) included in interest income and other, net related to assets held as of August 30, 2009

  $(4 $(4 $(8
             

The Company reports transfers in and out of Levels 1, 2, and 3, as applicable, using the fair value of the individual securities as of the beginning of the reporting period in which the transfer occurred. There were no transfers in or out of Level 1, 2, or 3 during 2010. During 2009, the Company considered continuing indicators of significant unobservable inputs, such as the lengthening of maturities, later-than-scheduled payments,2011 and any securities that have defaulted, as Level 3 inputs for valuation. This resulted in a transfer into Level 3 from Level 2.2010.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

At the beginning of 2010, the Company adopted the fair value measurement guidance for all nonfinancialFinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosedmeasured at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis include held-to-maturity investments that are carried at amortized cost and are not remeasured to fair value on a recurring basis. TheseThere were no fair value adjustments to these financial assets measured during the 2011 and liabilities2010.

Nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include items such as long lived assets that are measured at fair value resulting from an impairment, if deemed necessary. Fair market value adjustments to those financial andthese nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2011 and 2010 were immaterial.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 4—Debt

Bank Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper Programs

The Company enters into various short-term bank credit facilities and commercial paper programs.facilities. At the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, the total amount of credit under these facilities was $391 and $341, and $388, respectively, and therespectively. The total amount outstanding was $26 and $16, respectively.at the end of 2010. There was nothing outstanding at the end of 2011. The various credit facilities provide for applicable interest rates ranging from 0.58% to 4.39% in 2011 and 0.61% to 3.63% in 2010 and 0.64% to 3.75% in 2009.2010.

Short-Term Borrowings

The weighted average borrowings, maximum borrowings, and weighted average interest rate under all short-term borrowing arrangements were as follows for 20102011 and 2009:2010:

 

Category of Aggregate

Short-term Borrowings

  Maximum Amount
Outstanding
During the Fiscal Year
   Average Amount
Outstanding
During the Fiscal Year
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Fiscal Year
   Maximum Amount
Outstanding
During the Fiscal Year
   Average Amount
Outstanding
During the Fiscal Year
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Fiscal Year
 

Year ended August 28, 2011

      

Bank borrowings:

      

Canada

  $6    $4     3.00

Japan

   70     20     0.58  

Bank overdraft facility:

      

United Kingdom

   16     4     1.50  

Year ended August 29, 2010

            

Bank borrowings:

            

Canada

  $1    $1     2.75  $1    $1     2.75

Japan

   64     39     0.63     64     39     0.63  

Bank overdraft facility:

            

United Kingdom

   5     2     1.50     5     2     1.50  

Year ended August 30, 2009

      

Bank borrowings:

      

Canada

  $90    $64     2.80

United Kingdom

   31     23     1.72  

Japan

   29     22     0.93  

Bank overdraft facility:

      

United Kingdom

   20     4     1.64  

Other:

      

United Kingdom Money Market Line Borrowing

   31     13     4.47  

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 4—Debt (Continued)

 

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt at the end of 20102011 and 20092010 consisted of the following:

 

  2010   2009   2011   2010 

5.5% Senior Notes due March 2017

  $1,096    $1,096    $1,097    $1,096  

5.3% Senior Notes due March 2012

   899     899     900     899  

2.695% Promissory notes due October 2017

   77     69     85     77  

0.35% over Yen TIBOR (6-month) Term Loan due June 2018

   35     32     39     35  

3.5% Zero Coupon convertible subordinated notes due August 2017

   32     32     31     32  

0.92% Promissory notes due April 2010

   0     43  

0.88% Promissory notes due November 2009

   0     32  

Other long-term debt

   2     7     1     2  
          

 

   

 

 

Total long-term debt

   2,141     2,210     2,153     2,141  

Less current portion

   0     80  

Less current portion of 5.3% Senior Notes due March 2012

   900     0  
          

 

   

 

 

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

  $2,141    $2,130    $1,253    $2,141  
          

 

   

 

 

In April 2010, the Company’s Japanese subsidiary paid the outstanding principal and interest balances related to the 0.92% promissory notes due April 2010, originally issued in April 2003. In November 2009, the Company’s Japanese subsidiary paid the outstanding principal and interest balances related to the 0.88% promissory notes due November 2009, originally issued in November 2002.

In June 2008, the Company’s Japanese subsidiary entered into a ten-year term loan with a variable rate of interest of Yen TIBOR (6-month) plus a 0.35% margin (0.84%(0.79% and 0.95%0.84% at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively) on the outstanding balance. Interest is payable semi-annually in December and June and principal is due in June 2018.

In October 2007, the Company’s Japanese subsidiary issued promissory notes through a private placement, bearing interest at 2.695%. Interest is payable semi-annually, and principal is due in October 2017. The Company guarantees all of the promissory notesfinancing instruments issued by its Japanese subsidiary.

In February 2007, the Company issued $900 of 5.3% Senior Notes due March 15, 2012 (2012 Notes) at a discount of $2 and $1,100 of 5.5% Senior Notes due March 15, 2017 (2017 Notes) at a discount of $6 (together the 2007 Senior Notes). Interest on the 2007 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The discount and issuance costs associated with the Senior Notes are being amortized to interest expense over the terms of those notes. The Company, at its option, may redeem the 2007 Senior Notes at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price plus accrued interest. The redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the 2007 Senior Notes to be redeemed, or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest to maturity. Additionally, the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase the 2007 Senior Notes at a price of 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase, upon certain events as defined by the terms of the 2007 Senior Notes. In March 2011, the Company reclassified its 2012 Notes, to a current liability within the current portion of long-term debt of the consolidated balance sheets to reflect its remaining maturity of less than one year.

In August 1997, the Company sold $900 principal amount at maturity 3.5% Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Notes (Zero Coupon Notes) due in August 2017. The Zero Coupon Notes were priced with a yield to maturity of 3.5%, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $450. The remaining Zero Coupon Notes outstanding are convertible into a maximum of 878,000 shares of Costco Common

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 4—Debt (Continued)

 

with a yield to maturity of 3.5%, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $450. The remaining Zero Coupon Notes outstanding are convertible into a maximum of 943,000 shares of Costco Common Stock shares at an initial conversion price of $22.71. Holders of the Zero Coupon Notes may require the Company to purchase the Zero Coupon Notes (at the discounted issue price plus accrued interest to date of purchase) in August 2012. The Company, at its option, may redeem the Zero Coupon Notes (at the discounted issue price plus accrued interest to date of redemption) any time after August 2002. As of August 29, 2010, $85928, 2011, $862 in principal amount of Zero Coupon Notes had been converted by note holders tointo shares of Costco Common Stock, of which the principal converted during 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009 is detailed in the table below:

 

  2010   2009   2008   2011   2010   2009 

Principal converted during period

�� $1    $25    $1    $3    $1    $25  

Principal converted, including the related debt discount

  $1    $19    $0    $2    $1    $19  

Shares issued upon conversion (000’s)

   18     562     13     65     18     562  

The carrying value and estimated fair value of long-term debt based on quoted market prices, consisted of the following at the end of 20102011 and 2009:2010:

 

  2010   2009   2011   2010 
  Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
 

2017 Notes

  $1,096    $1,295    $1,096    $1,213    $1,097    $1,314    $1,096    $1,295  

2012 Notes

   899     961     899     973     900     924     899     961  

Zero Coupon Notes

   32     51     32     44     31     63     32     51  

Other long-term debt

   114     122     183     185     125     134     114     122  
                  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,141    $2,429    $2,210    $2,415  

Total long-term debt

   2,153     2,435     2,141     2,429  

Less current portion

   900     924     0     0  
                  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

  $1,253    $1,511    $2,141    $2,429  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The estimated fair value of the zero coupon notes is based upon quoted market prices. All of the Company’s other debt obligations are based upon quoted market prices of similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Maturities of long-term debt during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:

 

2011

  $0  

2012

   899  

2013

   0  

2014

   0  

2015

   0  

Thereafter

   1,242  
     

Total

  $2,141  
     

Note 5—Leases

Operating Leases

The Company leases land and/or buildings at warehouses and certain other office and distribution facilities primarily under operating leases. These leases expire at various dates through 2049, with the exception of one lease in the Company’s United Kingdom subsidiary, which expires in 2151. These leases generally contain one or more of the following options which the Company can exercise at the end of the initial lease term: (a) renewal of the lease for a defined number of years at the then-fair

2012

  $900  

2013

   0  

2014

   0  

2015

   0  

2016

   0  

Thereafter

   1,253  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $2,153  
  

 

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 5—Leases (Continued)

market rental rate or rate stipulated in the lease agreement; (b) purchase of the property at the then-fair market value; or (c) right of first refusal in the event of a third party purchase offer.

The Company accounts for its lease expense with free rent periods and step-rent provisions on a straight-line basis over the original term of the lease, from the date the Company has control of the property. Certain leases provide for periodic rental increases based on the price indices, and some of the leases provide for rents based on the greater of minimum guaranteed amounts or sales volume. Contingent rents have not been material.Operating Leases

The aggregate rental expense and sublease income related to certain of its operating lease arrangements, for 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009 are as follows:

 

  Aggregate
rental
expense
   Sublease
income(1)
   Aggregate
rental
expense
   Sublease
income(1)
 

2011

  $208    $10  

2010

  $ 187    $ 10     187     10  

2009

   177     10     177     10  

2008

   167     10  

 

(1)

Included in interest income and other, net

Contingent rents are not material.

Capital Leases

The Company has entered into four capital leases for warehouse locations. Capital lease liabilities were recorded at the lesser of the estimated fair market value of the leased property or the net present value of the aggregate future minimum lease payments. These leases expire at various dates through 2040.

Gross assets recorded under these leases were $169$170 and $77,$169, at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively. These assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $7$13 and $1$7 at the end of 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively, are included in buildings and improvements in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amortization expense on capital lease assets is recorded as depreciation expense and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 5—Leases (Continued)

respectively.

Future minimum payments, net of sub-lease income of $173$183 for all years combined, during the next five fiscal years and thereafter under non-cancelable operating leases with terms of at least one year and capital leases, at the end of 2010,2011, were as follows:

 

  Operating
leases
   Capital lease
obligations
   Operating
leases
   Capital lease
obligations
 

2011

  $162    $10  

2012

   157     10    $183    $13  

2013

   155     10     182     13  

2014

   148     11     175     13  

2015

   134     11     162     13  

2016

   155     13  

Thereafter

   1,572     256     1,850     311  
          

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,328     308    $2,707     376  
          

 

   

 

 

Less: Amount representing interest

     (139

Less amount representing interest

     (207
          

 

 

Net present value of minimum lease payment

     169       169  

Less: Current Installments(1)

     (2

Less current installments(1)

     (3
          

 

 

Long-term capital lease obligations less current Installments(2)

    $167  

Long-term capital lease obligations less current installments(2)

    $166  
          

 

 

 

(1)

Included in other current liabilities.

 

(2)

Included in deferred income taxes and other liabilities.

Certain leases may require the Company to incur costs to return leased property to its original condition, such as the removal of gas tanks. The Company has recorded the estimatedEstimated asset retirement obligations associated with these leases, which amounted to $26$31 and $24$26 at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively, are recorded and 2009, respectively.

Note 6—Stockholders’ Equity

Dividends

The Company’s current quarterly dividend rate is $0.205 per share.

Stock Repurchase Programs

The Company’s stock repurchase activity during 2010, 2009,included in deferred income taxes and 2008 is summarized inother liabilities on the following table:consolidated balance sheets.

   Shares
Repurchased
(000’s)
   Average
Price per
Share
   Total
Cost
 

2010

   9,943    $57.14    $568  

2009

   895     63.84     57  

2008

   13,812     64.22     887  

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 6—Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

Dividends

The Company’s current quarterly dividend rate is $0.24 per share.

Stock Repurchase Programs

The Company’s stock repurchase activity during 2011, 2010, and 2009 is summarized in the following table:

 

   Shares
Repurchased
(000’s)
   Average
Price per
Share
   Total
Cost
 

2011

   8,939    $71.74    $641  

2010

   9,943     57.14     568  

2009

   895     63.84     57  

These amounts differ from the stock repurchase balances in the consolidated statements of cash flows to the extent that repurchases had not settled at the end of the fiscal year. Purchases are made from time-to-time, as conditions warrant, in the open market or in block purchases, and pursuant to share repurchase plans under SEC Rule 10b5-1. Repurchased shares are retired.

Amounts remaining under stock repurchase authorizations of the Board of Directors at the end of 20102011 are detailed below:

 

Date Authorized

  Amount
Authorized
   Amount
Repurchased
   Amount
Remaining
   Amount
Authorized
   Amount
Repurchased
   Amount
Remaining
 

Prior to November 2007

  $4,800    $4,800    $0    $4,800    $4,800    $0  

November 2007 (expires in November 2010)

   1,000     566     434  

July 2008 (expires in July 2011)

   1,000     0     1,000  

November 2007 (expired in November 2010)(1)

   1,000     705     0  

July 2008 (expired in July 2011)(2)

   1,000     208     0  

April 2011 (expires April 2015)

   4,000     294     3,706  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $6,800    $5,366    $1,434    $10,800    $6,007    $3,706  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

(1)

In November 2010, $295 of the November 2007 authorization expired having been unused by the Company.

(2)

In April 2011, $792 of the July 2008 authorization was cancelled and replaced by the Board of Directors upon authorization of the April 2011 stock repurchase program.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax where applicable, were as follows:

 

  2010   2009   2011   2010 

Unrealized gains on short-term investments

  $6    $3    $7    $6  

Foreign currency translation adjustment and other

   116     107  

Foreign-currency translation adjustment and other

   366     116  
          

 

   

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  $122    $110    $373    $122  
          

 

   

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation Plans

Through the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company granted stock options under the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (Second Restated 2002 Plan) and predecessor plans. Since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company has granted RSUs in lieu of stock options under the Second Restated 2002 Plan. In July 2008 Thethe Third Restated 2002 Plan was amended by the Board of Directors (Fourth Restated 2002 Plan). Under the Fourth Restated 2002 Plan, prospective grants of RSUs are subject, upon certain terminations of employment, to quarterly, as opposed to daily vesting. Previously awarded RSU grants continue to involve daily vesting upon certain terminations of employment. Additionally, employees who attain certain years of service with the Company will receive shares under accelerated vesting provisions on the annual vesting date rather than upon qualified retirement. The first grant impacted by these amendments occurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Fourth Restated 2002 Plan was amended following shareholder approval and is now referred to as the Fifth Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (Fifth Restated 2002 Plan). The Fifth Restated 2002 Plan authorizes the issuance of an additional 18,000,000 shares (10,285,714 RSUs) of common stock for future grants in addition to grants currently authorized. Each share issued in respect of stock bonuses or stock units is counted as 1.75 shares toward the limit of shares available. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of RSUs.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

Summary of Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes stock option transactions during 2010:2011:

 

   Number of
Options
(in 000’s)
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining

Contractual
Term
(in Years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value(1)
 

Outstanding at the end of 2009

   18,742   $40.17      

Exercised

   (5,576  41.74      

Forfeited or expired

   (4  43.58      
             

Outstanding at the end of 2010

   13,162   $39.50     3.33    $220  
                   

Exercisable at the end of 2010

   13,032   $39.43     3.31    $218  
                   
   Number Of
Options
(in 000’s)
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value(1)
 

Outstanding at the end of 2010

   13,162   $39.50      

Exercised

   (7,245  39.03      
  

 

 

�� 

 

 

     

Outstanding and exercisable at the end of 2011

   5,917   $40.07     2.77    $220  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

The difference between the original exercise price and market value of common stock at August 29, 2010.28, 2011.

The following is a summary of stock options outstanding at the end of 2010:2011:

 

   Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable 

Range of Prices

  Number of
Options
(in 000’s)
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of
Options
(in 000’s)
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 

$30.41–$37.35

   5,785     2.68    $35.12     5,785    $35.12  

$37.44–$43.00

   1,866     1.61     39.29     1,866     39.29  

$43.79–$43.79

   4,658     4.59     43.79     4,658     43.79  

$45.99–$52.50

   853     4.59     46.20     723     46.15  
                         
   13,162     3.33    $39.50     13,032    $39.43  
                         

Options exercisable and the weighted average exercise price at the end of 2009 and 2008:

   2009   2008 

Options exercisable (shares in 000’s)

   16,588     15,735  

Weighted average exercise price

  $39.62    $39.14  

The tax benefits realized and intrinsic value related to total stock options exercised during 2010, 2009, and 2008 are provided in the following table:

   2010   2009   2008 

Actual tax benefit realized for stock options exercised

  $34    $10    $86  

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised(1)

  $98    $27    $262  

(1)

The difference between the original exercise price and market value of common stock measured at each individual exercise date.

   Options Outstanding and Exercisable 

Range of Prices

  Number of
Options

(in 000’s)
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

$30.41–$37.35

   2,446     2.19    $35.38  

$37.44–$42.41

   481     0.67     39.05  

$43.79–$43.79

   2,649     3.59     43.79  

$45.99–$46.46

   341     3.58     46.19  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   5,917     2.77    $40.07  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

 

Options exercisable and the weighted average exercise price at the end of 2010 and 2009:

   2010   2009 

Options exercisable (shares in 000’s)

   13,032     16,588  

Weighted average exercise price

  $39.43    $39.62  

The tax benefits realized and intrinsic value related to total stock options exercised during 2011, 2010, and 2009 are provided in the following table:

   2011   2010   2009 

Actual tax benefit realized for stock options exercised

  $78    $34    $10  

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised(1)

  $227    $98    $27  

(1)

The difference between the exercise price and market value of common stock measured at each individual exercise date.

Employee Tax Consequences on Certain Stock Options

In 2010, the Company recorded a non-recurring benefit of $24 benefit to selling, general and administrative expense related to a partial reversalrefund of an expense related to mitigating potential adverse tax consequences to the Company’s Canadian employees,a previously recorded in fiscal 2007.Canadian employee tax liability.

Summary of Restricted Stock Unit Activity

RSUs granted to employees and to non-employee directors generally vest over five years and three years, respectively; however, the Company provides for accelerated vesting for employees that have attained twenty-five or more years of service with the Company. Recipients are not entitled to vote or receive dividends on unvested shares. At the end of 2010, 12,362,0002011, 8,565,000 shares were available to be granted as RSUs to eligible employees and directors under the Fifth Restated 2002 Plan.

The following awards were outstanding at the end of 2010:2011:

 

8,492,0009,010,000 shares of time-based RSUs whichthat vest upon the achievement of continued employment over specified periods of time; and

 

761,000717,000 performance-based RSUs, of which 305,000315,000 will be formally granted to certain executive officers of the Company upon the official certification of the attainment of specified performance targets for 2010.2011. Once formally granted, the restrictions lapse upon achievement of continued employment over specified periods of time.

The following table summarizes RSU transactions during 2010:2011:

 

   Number of
Units
(in 000’s)
  Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
 

Non-vested at the end of 2009

   8,531   $54.60  

Granted

   3,419    55.94  

Vested

   (2,597  54.15  

Forfeited

   (100  54.71  
         

Non-vested at the end of 2010

   9,253   $55.22  
         

Summary of Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation and the related tax benefits under the Company’s plans:

   2010  2009  2008 

Restricted stock units

  $171   $132   $97  

Stock options

   19    49    69  
             

Total stock-based compensation expense before income taxes

   190    181    166  

Income tax benefit

   (63  (60  (55
             

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of income tax

  $127   $121   $111  
             
   Number of
Units

(in 000’s)
  Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
 

Non-vested at the end of 2010

   9,253   $55.22  

Granted

   3,971    61.27  

Vested

   (3,322  55.55  

Forfeited

   (175  55.90  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-vested at the end of 2011

   9,727   $57.56  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

 

Summary of Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense and the related tax benefits under the Company’s plans:

   2011   2010   2009 

Restricted stock units

  $206    $171    $132  

Stock options

   1     19     49  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense before income taxes

   207     190     181  

Less recognized income tax benefit

   67     63     60  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of income taxes

  $140    $127    $121  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs and stock options at the end of 2010,August 28, 2011 was $386 and the weighed-averageweighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized are as follows:is 1.6 years.

   Unrecognized
Compensation
Cost
   Weighted Average
Period of Time
(in years)
 

RSUs

  $359     3.1  

Options

  $1     0.1  

Note 8—Retirement Plans

The Company has a 401(k) Retirement Plan that is available to all U.S. employees who have completed 90 days of employment. For all U.S. employees, with the exception of California union employees, the plan allows pre-tax deferrals against which the Company matches 50% of the first one thousand dollars of employee contributions. In addition, the Company provides each eligible participant an annual discretionary contribution based on salary and years of service.

California union employees participate in a defined benefit plan sponsored by their union. The Company makes contributions based upon its union agreement. For all the California union employees, the Company-sponsored 401(k) plan currently allows pre-tax deferrals against which the Company matches 50% of the first five hundred dollars of employee contributions. In addition, the Company will provide each eligible participant a contribution based on hours worked and years of service.

The Company has a defined contribution plan for Canadian and United Kingdom employees and contributes a percentage of each employee’s salary. Certain other foreign operations have defined benefit and defined contribution plans that are not significant.material. Amounts expensed under all plans were $345, $313, and $287 for 2011, 2010, and $272 for 2010, 2009, respectively, and 2008, respectively.were included in selling, general and administrative expenses and merchandise costs on the consolidated statements of income.

Note 9—Income Taxes

Income before income taxes is comprised of the following:

 

  2010   2009   2008   2011   2010   2009 

Domestic (including Puerto Rico)

  $1,426    $1,426    $1,542    $1,526    $1,426    $1,426  

Foreign

   628     301     469     857     628     301  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,054    $1,727    $2,011    $2,383    $2,054    $1,727  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 9—Income Taxes (Continued)

 

The provisions for income taxes for 2011, 2010, 2009, and 20082009 are as follows:

 

  2010   2009 2008   2011 2010   2009 

Federal:

          

Current

  $445    $396   $470    $409   $445    $396  

Deferred

   1     67    35     74    1     67  
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total federal

   446     463    505     483    446     463  
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

State:

          

Current

   79     66    84     78    79     66  

Deferred

   5     12    (7   14    5     12  
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total state

   84     78    77     92    84     78  
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

          

Current

   200     94    138     270    200     94  

Deferred

   1     (7  (4   (4  1     (7
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total foreign

   201     87    134     266    201     87  
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total provision for income taxes

  $731    $628   $716    $841   $731    $628  
             

 

  

 

   

 

 

Tax benefits associated with the exercise of employee stock options and other employee stock programs were allocated directly to equity attributable to Costco in the amount of $59, $15, and $2, in 2011, 2010, and $62, in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

The reconciliation between the statutory tax rate and the effective rate for 2011, 2010, 2009, and 20082009 is as follows:

 

  2010   2009   2008   2011 2010 2009 

Federal taxes at statutory rate

  $718    35.0  $604    35.0  $704    35.0  $834    35.0 $718    35.0 $604    35.0

State taxes, net

   56    2.7     48    2.8     51    2.5     55    2.4    56    2.7    48    2.8  

Foreign taxes, net

   (38  (1.9   (24  (1.4   (28  (1.4   (66  (2.8  (38  (1.9  (24  (1.4

Tax (provision) benefit on unremitted earnings

   0    0     (1  (0.1   4    0.2  

Other

   (5  (0.2   1    0.1     (15  (0.7   18    0.7    (5  (0.2  0    0  
                       

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $731    35.6  $628    36.4  $716    35.6  $841    35.3 $731    35.6 $628    36.4
                       

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

   2011   2010 

Equity compensation

  $89    $112  

Deferred income/membership fees

   134     118  

Accrued liabilities and reserves

   429     392  

Other

   32     35  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   684     657  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property and equipment

   494     414  

Merchandise inventories

   164     170  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   658     584  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  $26    $73  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 9—Income Taxes (Continued)

 

The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

   2010   2009 

Equity compensation

  $112    $117  

Deferred income/membership fees

   118     94  

Accrued liabilities and reserves

   392     408  

Other

   35     48  
          

Total deferred tax assets

   657     667  
          

Property and equipment

   414     403  

Merchandise inventories

   170     184  
          

Total deferred tax liabilities

   584     587  
          

Net deferred tax assets

  $73    $80  
          

The deferred tax accounts at the end of 20102011 and 20092010 include current deferred income tax assets of $307$360 and $247$307, respectively, included in deferred income taxes and other current assets; non-current deferred income tax assets of $10$53 and $7,$10, respectively, included in other assets; and non-current deferred income tax liabilities of $244$387 and $174,$244, respectively, included in deferred income taxes and other liabilities.

The Company has not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. affiliates, including its 50% owned investment in the Mexico corporate joint venture,consolidated subsidiaries, aggregating $1,972to $2,646 and $1,554$1,972 at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively, as such earnings are deemed by the Company to be indefinitely reinvested. Because of the availability of U.S. foreign tax credits and complexity of the computation, it is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability or benefit that would be associated with such earnings if such earnings were not deemed to be indefinitely reinvested.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for 20102011 and 20092010 is as follows:

 

  2010 2009   2011 2010 

Gross unrecognized tax benefit at beginning of year

  $80   $98    $83   $80  

Gross increases—current year tax positions

   29    9     21    29  

Gross increases—tax positions in prior years

   4    6     10    4  

Gross decreases—tax positions in prior years

   (1  (2   (6  (1

Settlements

   (27  (31   (1  (27

Lapse of statute of limitations

   (2  0     (1  (2
         

 

  

 

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefit at end of year

  $83   $80    $106   $83  
         

 

  

 

 

Included in the balance at the end of 2010,2011, are $50$64 of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of these tax positions would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 9—Income Taxes (Continued)

The total amount of such unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods is $27$34 and $20$27 at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively.

Accrued interest and penalties related to income tax matters are classified as a component of income tax expense, which is consistent with the classification prior to the adoption of the guidance discussed in Note 1.expense. The Company recognized $2 of expense and $7 of income related to interest and penalties in 2010.2011 and 2010, respectively. Accrued interest and penalties are $9$12 and $20$9 at the end of 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively.

The Company is currently under audit by several taxing jurisdictions in the United States and in several foreign countries. Some audits may conclude in the next 12 months and the unrecognized tax benefits we have recorded in relation to the audits may differ from actual settlement amounts. It is not possible to estimate the effect, if any, of any amount of such change during the next 12 months to previously recorded uncertain tax positions in connection with the audits. The Company does not anticipate that there will be a material increase or decrease in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve12 months.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 9—Income Taxes (Continued)

The Company files income tax returns in the United States, various state and local jurisdictions, in Canada and in several other foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local examination for years before fiscal 2007. The Company is currently subject to examination in Canada for fiscal years 2006 to present and in California for fiscal years 2004 to present. No other examinations are believed to be material.

Note 10—Net Income Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

The following table shows the amounts used in computing net income per share and the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock (shares in 000’s):

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Net income available to common stockholders used in basic net income per common share

  $1,303    $1,086    $1,283  

Interest on convertible notes, net of tax

   1     1     1  
               

Net income available to common stockholders after assumed conversions of dilutive securities

  $1,304    $1,087    $1,284  
               

Weighted average number of common shares used in basic net income per common share

   438,611     433,988     434,442  

Stock options and RSUs

   6,409     5,072     8,268  

Conversion of convertible notes

   950     1,394     1,530  
               

Weighted number of common shares and dilutive potential of common stock used in diluted net income per share

   445,970     440,454     444,240  
               

Anti-dilutive stock options and RSUs

   1,141     8,045     11  

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

   2011   2010   2009 

Net income available to common stockholders used in basic net income per common share

  $1,462    $1,303    $1,086  

Interest on convertible notes, net of tax

   1     1     1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income available to common stockholders after assumed conversions of dilutive securities

  $1,463    $1,304    $1,087  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares used in basic net income per common share

   436,119     438,611     433,988  

Stock options and RSUs

   6,063     6,409     5,072  

Conversion of convertible notes

   912     950     1,394  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted number of common shares and dilutive potential of common stock used in diluted net income per share

   443,094     445,970     440,454  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Anti-dilutive stock options and RSUs

   0     1,141     8,045  

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved from time to time in claims, proceedings and litigation arising from its business and property ownership. The Company is a defendant in the following matters, among others:

Cases purportedly brought as class actions on behalf of certain present and former Costco managers in California, in which plaintiffs principally allege that they have not been properly compensated for overtime work. Scott M. Williams v. Costco Wholesale Corp., United States District Court (San Diego), Case No. 02-CV-2003 NAJ (JFS); Greg Randall v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC-296369. The parties in Randall agreed on a partial settlement of the action (resolving all claims except for the claim that the Company miscalculated pay), requiring a payment of up to $16 by the Company, which was substantially paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The miscalculation claim from the Randall case was refiled as a separate action by stipulation, alleging that the Company miscalculated the rates of pay for all department and ancillary managers in California in violation of Labor Code Section 515(d). On October 2, 2009, the court granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment, and that ruling has been appealed. Terry Head v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC-409805. In the Williams action, the parties have achieved a settlement. The settlement is immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On December 26, 2007, another putativeA class action was filed also principally alleging denial of overtime compensation. The complaint alleges misclassification of certain California managers. Onon May 15, 2008, the court partially granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the complaint, dismissing certain claims and refusing to expand the statute of limitations for the remaining claims. An answer to the complaint was filed on May 27, 2008. Plaintiff’s class certification motion was denied, while a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action was conditionally certified for notice purposes only. The Company’s motion to decertify was granted on September 14, 2010. Jesse Drenckhahn v. Costco Wholesale Corp., United States District Court (Los Angeles), Case No. CV08-1408 FMC (JMJ).

A case purportedly brought as a class action2009, on behalf of present and former hourly employees in California, in which the plaintiff principally alleges that the Company’s routine closing procedures and security checks cause employees to incur delays that qualify as uncompensated working time and that deny them statutorily guaranteed meal periods and rest breaks. The complaint was filed on October 2, 2008, and the Company’s motion to dismiss was partially granted. On February 1, 2010, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification, and that ruling was appealed. The court granted summary judgment against the plaintiff on his individual claim on April 19, 2010. Plaintiff subsequently agreed to dismiss the action. Anthony Castaneda v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC-399302. A similar purported class action was filed on May 15, 2009, on behalf of present and former hourly employees in California, claiming denial of wages and false imprisonment during the post-closing procedures, when security measures allegedly cause employees to be locked in the warehouses.time. Mary Pytelewski v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Superior Court for the County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2009-00089654. The case was removed to the United States District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego), Case No. 09-CV-02473-AJB (BGS). On December 14, 2010, the court certified two classes of hourly non-exempt employees subject to the Company’s closing lockdown procedures: one under California law for California non-union employees who were subject to the closing procedures between May 15, 2005, and October 1, 2009; and a nationwide class under federal law for full-time employees who were subject to the closing procedures between March 1, 2008, and October 1, 2009. The case has been renamed Eric Stiller v. Costco Wholesale Corp. and the parties are conducting discovery. A similar purported class action was filed on November 20, 2009, in the State of Washington. Raven Hawk v. Costco Wholesale Corp., King County Superior Court, Case No. 09-242196-0-SEA.

A putative class action, filed on January 24, 2008, purportedly brought on behalf of two groups of former California employees: an “Unpaid Wage Class”; and a “Wage Statement Class.” The “Unpaid

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

 

Wage Class” alleges that the Company improperly deducts employee credit card balances from final paychecks, while the “Wage Statement Class” alleges that final paychecks do not contain the accurate and itemized information legally required for wage statements.Raven Hawk v. Costco Wholesale Corp., King County Superior Court, Case No. 09-242196-0-SEA. On May 29, 2008,December 3, 2010, the court granted in part a motion to dismiss, dismissing with prejudice the wage itemization claims. On May 5, 2009, the court denied the Company’splaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s class certification motion was denied, while an FLSA collective action was conditionallycertification; the class certified consists of people employed in Washington state warehouses from November 2006 through November 2009 who had clocked out and were detained during closing procedures without compensation. Trial has been scheduled for notice purposes only. Eighteen individuals filed consents to join the FLSA collective actions. Carrie Ward v. Costco Wholesale Corp., United States District Court (Los Angeles), Case No. CV08-02013 FMC (FFM).February 13, 2012.

On July 14, 2010, a putative class action was filed alleging that the Company unlawfully failed to pay overtime compensation, denied meal and rest breaks, failed to pay minimum wages, failed to provide accurate wage-itemization statements, and willfully failed to pay termination wages allegedallegedly resulting from misclassification of certain California department managers as exempt employees. On September 3, 2010, the Company removed the case to federal court. The court remanded the action, and the Company’s petition to the Ninth Circuit for permission to appeal the remand order was denied. On June 24, 2011, defendants filed a motion to strike the class and certain other allegations from the complaint. On July 26, 2011, the court granted the motion in part, without leave to amend, striking allegations predating December 31, 2008, which are covered by a prior class settlement. The Court also granted the motion with respect to allegations post-dating December 31, 2008, but granted plaintiff leave to amend. On August 25, 2011, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, and on September 20, 2011, defendants renewed the motion to strike. The motion is set for hearing on October 13, 2011. Manuel Medrano v. Costco Wholesale Corp., and Costco Wholesale Membership, Inc., Superior Court of California (Los Angeles), Case No. BC441597.

In Velazquez v. Costco, filed April 4, 2011, now pending in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. CV11-00508 JVS (RNBx), three former California Receiving Managers seek class treatment for their claim that Costco misclassified California Receiving Managers as exempt. On October 11, 2011, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.

On May 12, 2011, a putative class action was filed on behalf of California employees alleging that the Company failed to provide its cashiers with seats, in violation of California law. The complaint also alluded to purported overtime violations and missed meal periods and rest breaks. On August 10, 2011, the Company removed the case to federal court. On August, 17, 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the class action complaint. On August 30, 2011, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case, and a dismissal without prejudice was entered. Suzanne Justice v. Costco Wholesale Corp., United States District Court (Los Angeles), Case No. CV-10-6626-VBF-JCGx.

On July 23, 2010, a putative class action was filed against several defendants, including the Company, alleging that defendants unlawfully failed to pay overtime compensation, failed to provide accurate wage-itemization statements, failed to pay wages, denied meal and rest breaks, and failed to reimburse for uniforms and expenses. Plaintiffs are temporary promotion employees, known as “product ambassadors,” hired by various marketing companies (also named defendants), which contract with retailers such as the Company, to staff in-store demonstrations and promotional events. The complaint alleges that the Company is a “joint employer” of the plaintiffs. Bright v. Dennis Garberg & Assocs., Inc., et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC399563.LACV11-6563-ODW (JEMx).

Claims in thesethe above actions (other than Hawk) are made under various provisions of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. Plaintiffs seek restitution/disgorgement, compensatory damages, various statutory penalties, punitive damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees.

A case brought as a class action on behalf of certain present and former female managers, in which plaintiffs allege denial of promotion based on gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and California state law. Shirley “Rae” Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp., United States District Court (San Francisco), Case No. C-04-3341-MHP. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, interest and attorneys’ fees. Class certification was granted by the district court on January 11, 2007. On May 11, 2007,September 16, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted a petitionreversed the order of class certification and remanded to hear the Company’s appeal of the certification. The appeal was argued on April 14, 2008.district court for further proceedings.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Class actions stated to have been brought on behalf of certain present and former Costco members:

Numerous putative class actions have been brought around the United States against motor fuel retailers, including the Company, alleging that they have been overcharging consumers by selling gasoline or diesel that is warmer than 60 degrees without adjusting the volume sold to compensate for heat-related expansion or disclosing the effect of such expansion on the energy equivalent received by the consumer. The Company is named in the following actions: Raphael Sagalyn, et al., v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-430 (D. Md.); Phyllis Lerner, et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

al., Case No. 07-1216 (C.D. Cal.); Linda A. Williams, et al., v. BP Corporation North America, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-179 (M.D. Ala.); James Graham, et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-193 (E.D. Va.); Betty A. Delgado, et al., v. Allsups, Convenience Stores, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-202 (D.N.M.); Gary Kohut, et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-285 (D. Nev.); Mark Rushing, et al., v. Alon USA, Inc., et al., Case No. 06-7621 (N.D. Cal.); James Vanderbilt, et al., v. BP Corporation North America, Inc., et al., Case No. 06-1052 (W.D. Mo.); Zachary Wilson, et al., v. Ampride, Inc., et al., Case No. 06-2582 (D. Kan.); Diane Foster, et al., v. BP North America Petroleum, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-02059 (W.D. Tenn.); Mara Redstone, et al., v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-20751 (S.D. Fla.); Fred Aguirre, et al. v. BP West Coast Products LLC, et al., Case No. 07-1534 (N.D. Cal.); J.C. Wash, et al., v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al.; Case No. 4:07cv37 (E.D. Mo.); Jonathan Charles Conlin, et al., v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al.; Case No. 07 0317 (M.D. Tenn.); William Barker, et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al.; Case No. 07-cv-00293 (D.N.M.); Melissa J. Couch, et al. v. BP Products North America, Inc., et al., Case No. 07cv291 (E.D. Tex.); S. Garrett Cook, Jr., et al., v. Hess Corporation, et al., Case No. 07cv750 (M.D. Ala.); Jeff Jenkins, et al. v. Amoco Oil Company, et al., Case No. 07-cv-00661 (D. Utah); and Mark Wyatt, et al., v. B. P. America Corp., et al., Case No. 07-1754 (S.D. Cal.). On June 18, 2007, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation assigned the action, entitled In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation, MDL Docket No 1840, to Judge Kathryn Vratil in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. On February 21, 2008, the court denied a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. On April 12, 2009, the Company agreed to a settlement involving the actions in which it is named as a defendant. Under the settlement, which is subject to final approval by the court, the Company has agreed, to the extent allowed by law, to install over five years from the effective date of the settlement temperature-correcting dispensers in the States of Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Virginia. Other than payments to class representatives, the settlement does not provide for cash payments to class members. On August 18, 2009, the court preliminarily approved the settlement. On August 13, 2010, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of the settlement. The Company expects thatOn February 3, 2011, a revised settlement will beagreement was submitted for court approval. On September 22, 2011, the court preliminarily approved the revised settlement.

The Company has been named as a defendant in two purported class actions relating to sales of organic milk. Hesse v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. C07-1975 (W.D. Wash.); Snell v. Aurora Dairy Corp., et al., No. 07-CV-2449 (D. Col.). Both actions claim violations of the laws of various states, essentially alleging that milk provided to Costco by its supplier Aurora Dairy Corp. was improperly labeled “organic.” Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on July 18, 2008. With respect to the Company, plaintiffs seek to certify four classes of people who purchased Costco organic milk. Aurora has maintained that it has held and continues to hold valid organic certifications. The consolidated complaint seeks, among other things, actual, compensatory, statutory, punitive and/or exemplary damages in unspecified amounts, as well as costs and attorneys'attorneys’ fees. On June 3, 2009, the district court

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

entered an order dismissing with prejudice, among others, all claims against the Company. As a result of an appeal by the plaintiffs, on September 15, 2010, the court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the rulings of the district court and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

The Company has been named as a defendant in a purported class action relating to sales of farm-raised salmon. Farm Raised Salmon Coordinated Proceedings, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. JCCP No. 4329. The action alleges that the Company violated California law requiring farm-raised salmon to be labeled as “color added.” The complaint asserts violations of the California Unfair Com-

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

petition Law, the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the California False Advertising Law, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks restoration of money acquired by means of unfair competition or false advertising and compensatory damages in unspecified amounts, injunctive relief remedying the allegedly improper disclosures, and costs and attorneys’ fees. A California Superior Court ruling dismissing the action on the ground that federal law does not permit claims for mislabeling of farm-raised salmon to be asserted by private parties was reversed by the California Supreme Court. The Company has denied the material allegations of the complaint. Plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class is pending. Plaintiffs have filed amended complaints.

In Verzani, et ano., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 09 CV 2117 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York), a purported nationwide class action, the plaintiffs allege claims for breach of contract and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, based on the failure of the Company to disclose on the label of its “Shrimp Tray with Cocktail Sauce” the weight of the shrimp in the item as distinct from the accompanying cocktail sauce, lettuce, and lemon wedges. The complaint seeks various forms of damages (including compensatory and treble damages and disgorgement and restitution), injunctive and declaratory relief, attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest. On April 21, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking to prevent the Company from selling the shrimp tray unless the Company separately discloses the weight of the shrimp and provides shrimp consistent with the disclosed weight. By orders dated July 29 and August 6, 2009, the court denied the preliminary injunction motion and dismissed the claim for breach of contract, and on July 21, 2010, the court of appeals summarily affirmed these rulings. On September 28, 2010, the district court denied the motion of one plaintiff to file an amended complaint. On September 20, 2011, the court of appeals affirmed the rulings of the district court.

In Kilano, et. ano, v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 2:10-cv-11456-VAR-DAS (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan), two members purport to representfiled on April 12, 2010, a purported class action was filed on behalf of certain Michigan Executive level-members who received 2% rewards. Plaintiffs allege that the Company “guarantees” that the member will receive rewards of no less than the fifty dollar difference between Executive and Gold Star membership and that the Company is required to but has failed to automatically reimburse members whose rewards are less than this difference. Plaintiffs allege violations of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. They seek compensatory and statutory damages, injunctive relief, costs, and attorneys’ fees. The Company filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint. On April 5, 2011, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification. On July 22, 2011, plaintiffs sought leave to file an amended complaint.

On March 15, 2011, Robles, et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corporation was filed as a purported class action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 11-CV-1785. Plaintiffs seek to represent a class composed of all disabled persons with ambulatory impairments who depend upon the use of a wheelchair and are allegedly unable to obtain optometry services at the Company. Plaintiffs allege that the Company has failed to remove architectural barriers that prevent full and equal enjoyment of and access to its eye examination services. They allege violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. They seek injunctive relief and compensatory damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees. The Company has filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint.

Three shareholder derivative lawsuits have beenwere filed, ostensibly on behalf of the Company, against certain of its current and former officers and directors, relating to the Company’s stock option grants. One suit, Sandra Donnelly v. James Sinegal, et al., Case No. 08-2-23783-4 SEA (King County Superior Court), was filed in Washington state court on or about July 17, 2008. Plaintiff alleged, among

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

other things, that individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by “backdating” grants of stock options issued between 1997 and 2005 to various current and former executives, allegedly in violation of the Company'sCompany’s shareholder-approved stock option plans. The complaint asserted claims for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duties, and waste of corporate assets, and seeks damages, corporate governance reforms, an accounting, rescission of certain stock option grants, restitution, and certain injunctive and declaratory relief, including the declaration of a constructive trust for certain stock options and proceeds derived from the exercise of such options. On April 3, 2009, on the Company’s motion the court dismissed the action, following the plaintiff’s disclosure that she had ceased to own Costco common stock, a requirement for her to pursue a derivative action. The second

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

action, Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. James Sinegal, et al., Case No. 2:08-cv-01450-TSZ (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington), was filed on or about September 29, 2008, and named as defendants all but one of the Company’s directors and certain of its senior executives. Plaintiff alleged that defendants approved the issuance of backdated stock options, concealed the backdating of stock options, and refused to vindicate the Company’s rights by pursuing those who obtained improper incentive compensation. The complaint asserted claims under both state law and the federal securities laws and sought relief comparable to that sought in the state court action described above. Plaintiff further alleged that the misconduct occurred from at least 1997, and continued until 2006, and that as a result virtually all of the Company’s SEC filings and financial and other public statements were false and misleading throughout this entire period (including, but not limited to, each of the Company’s annual financial statements for fiscal years 1997 through 2007 inclusive). Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that defendants caused the Company to falsely represent that options were granted with exercise prices that were not less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and issuance when they were not, to conceal that its internal controls and accounting controls were grossly inadequate, and to grossly overstate its earnings. In addition, it was further alleged that when the Company announced in October 2006 that it had investigated its historical option granting practices and had not found fraud that announcement itself was false and misleading because, among other reasons, it failed to report that defendants had consistently received options granted at monthly lows for the grant dates and falsely suggested that backdating did not occur. Plaintiff also alleged that false and misleading statements inflated the market price of the Company’s common stock and that certain individual defendants sold, and the Company purchased, shares at inflated prices. The third action, Daniel Buckfire v. James D. Sinegal, et al., No. 2:09-cv-00893-TSZ (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington), was filed on or about June 29, 2009, and contains allegations substantially similar to those in the Pirelli action. On August 12, 2009, the court entered an order consolidating the Pirelli and Buckfire actions. On October 2, 2009, plaintiffs Pirelli and Buckfire filed a consolidated amended complaint. That complaint is largely similar to previous filings, except that: it challenges additional grants (in 1995, 1996, and 2004) and alleges that additional federal securities law filings, including proxy statements and SEC Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q and related officer certifications (generally from 1996 through and including 2008) were false and misleading for failure to adequately disclose circumstances surrounding grants of options; and now includes as defendants only the following individuals: James D. Sinegal, Richard A. Galanti, Jeffrey H. Brotman, Hamilton E. James, John W. Meisenbach, Jill S. Ruckelshaus, Charles T. Munger, Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., Richard D. DiCerchio, and David S. Petterson. On November 16, 2009, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint on various grounds, including that plaintiffs failed to properly to allege why a pre-suit demand had not been made on the boardBoard of directors.Directors. On September 20, 2010, a special committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs that would terminate the litigation. The agreement, which iswas subject among other things to federal district court approval, providesprovided that the Company will pay an amount not to exceed $4.85 million in attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs’ counsel and will adopt or maintain certain governance, control and other process changes. On December 20, 2010, the parties executed a stipulation of settlement, and on January 14, 2011, plaintiffs filed a motion for court approval of the settlement. On February 28, 2011, the court entered an order that preliminarily approved, subject to further consideration at a settlement hearing, the proposed settlement of the action involving, among other things, a dismissal of the consolidated derivative actions with prejudice. On June 10, 2011, the court granted final approval to the settlement, and the case has been dismissed.

On October 4, 2006, the Company received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, seeking records relating to the Company’s receipt and handling of hazardous merchandise returned by Costco members and other records. The Company is cooperatinghas entered into a tolling agreement with the inquiry and at this time cannot reasonably estimate any loss that may arise from this matter.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

United States Attorney’s Office.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an Information Request to the Company, dated November 1, 2007, under the Clean Air Act. The EPA is seekingsought records regarding warehouses in the states of Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Nevada relating to compliance with regulations concerning air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. On March 4, 2009, the Company was advised by the Department of Justice that the Department was prepared to allege that the Company has committed at least nineteen violations of the leak-repair requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 82.156(i) and at least seventy-four violations of the recordkeeping requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 82.166(k), (m) at warehouses in these four states. The Company has responded to these allegations, is engaged in communications with the Department about these and additional allegations made by letter dated September 10, 2009, and has entered into a tolling agreement. An Information Request dated January 14, 2008, has also been received concerning a warehouse in New Hampshire.agreements. Substantial penalties may be levied for violations of the Clean Air Act. In April 2008 the Company received an information request from the South Coast Air Quality Management District concerning certain locations in Southern California. The Company has responded to that request. The Company is cooperating with these inquiriesthis inquiry.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

Note 11—Commitments and at this time cannot reasonably estimate any loss that might arise from these matters.Contingencies (Continued)

On October 7, 2009, the District Attorneys for San Diego, San Joaquin and Solano Counties filed a complaint, People of the State of California v. Costco Wholesale Corp., et.et al, No. 37-2009-00099912 (Superior Court for the County of San Diego), alleging on information and belief that the Company has violated and continues to violate provisions of the California Health and Safety Code and the Business and Professions Code through the use of certain spill clean-up materials at its gasoline stations. Relief sought includes, among other things, requests for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, civil penalties, costs and attorneys’ fees. On September 2, 2010, the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice. An amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2010.

The Company has received notices from most states stating that they have appointed an agent to conduct an examination of the books and records of the Company to determine whether it has complied with state unclaimed property laws. The States of Washington and New York are conducting such examinations on their own behalf. In addition to seeking the turnover of unclaimed property subject to escheat laws, the states may seek interest, penalties, costs of examinations, and other relief. The State of Washington conducted such an examination on its own behalf and on February 4, 2011 issued an assessment. The Company filed suit on March 4, 2011, to contest the assessment.

Except where indicated otherwise above, a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time for the matters described. The Company does not believe that any pending claim, proceeding or litigation, either alone or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position; however, it is possible that an unfavorable outcome of some or all of the matters, however unlikely, could result in a charge that might be material to the results of an individual fiscal quarter.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 12—Segment Reporting

The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the operation of membership warehouses in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, through majority-owned subsidiaries in Taiwan and Korea, and through a 50%-owned joint-venture in Mexico.the Mexico joint venture. The Company’s reportable segments are largely based on management’s organization of the operating segments for operational decisions and assessments of financial performance, which considers geographic locations. The investmentAs discussed in Note 1, the Company began consolidating Mexico joint-venture ison August 30, 2010. For segment reporting, these operations are included as a component of other international operations for the year ended August 28, 2011. Prior year amounts for Mexico are only included in total assets under United States Operationsoperations in the table below, representing the equity method investment in the joint venture, as it iswas previously accounted for under the equity method and its operations arewere not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.consolidated. The material accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1. All material inter-segment net sales and expenses have been eliminated in computing total revenue and operating income.

 

  United States
Operations
   Canadian
Operations
   Other
International
Operations
   Total 

Year Ended August 28, 2011

        

Total revenue

  $64,904    $14,020    $9,991    $88,915  

Operating income

   1,395     621     423     2,439  

Depreciation and amortization

   640     117     98     855  

Capital expenditures, net

   876     144     270     1,290  

Property and equipment, net

   8,870     1,608     1,954     12,432  

Total assets

   18,558     3,741     4,462     26,761  
  United States
Operations
   Canadian
Operations
   Other
International
Operations
   Total 

Year Ended August 29, 2010

                

Total revenue

  $59,624    $12,051    $6,271    $77,946    $59,624    $12,051    $6,271    $77,946  

Operating income

   1,310     547     220     2,077     1,310     547     220     2,077  

Depreciation and amortization

   625     107     63     795     625     107     63     795  

Capital expenditures, net

   804     162     89     1,055     804     162     89     1,055  

Property and equipment, net

   8,709     1,474     1,131     11,314     8,709     1,474     1,131     11,314  

Total assets

   18,247     3,147     2,421     23,815     18,247     3,147     2,421     23,815  

Total equity

   7,784     1,752     1,394     10,930  

Year Ended August 30, 2009

                

Total revenue

  $56,548    $9,737    $5,137    $71,422    $56,548    $9,737    $5,137    $71,422  

Operating income

   1,273     354     150     1,777     1,273     354     150     1,777  

Depreciation and amortization

   589     90     49     728     589     90     49     728  

Capital expenditures, net

   904     135     211     1,250     904     135     211     1,250  

Property and equipment, net

   8,415     1,394     1,091     10,900     8,415     1,394     1,091     10,900  

Total assets

   17,228     2,641     2,110     21,979     17,228     2,641     2,110     21,979  

Total equity

   7,458     1,470     1,176     10,104  

Year Ended August 31, 2008

        

Total revenue

  $56,903    $10,528    $5,052    $72,483  

Operating income

   1,393     420     156     1,969  

Depreciation and amortization

   511     92     50     653  

Capital expenditures, net

   1,190     246     163     1,599  

Property and equipment, net

   8,016     1,371     968     10,355  

Total assets

   16,345     2,477     1,860     20,682  

Total equity

   6,882     1,292     1,100     9,274  

 

Certain home office operating expenses are incurred on behalf of the Company’s Canadian and other international operations,Other International Operations, but are included in the United States operationsOperations above because those costs are not allocated internally and generally come under the responsibility of the Company’s United States management team.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 13—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The two tables that follow reflect the unaudited quarterly results of operations for 20102011 and 2009.2010.

 

  52 Weeks Ended August 29, 2010   52 Weeks Ended August 28, 2011(1) 
  First
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Second
Quarter

12 Weeks
 Third
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Fourth
Quarter
16 Weeks
 Total 52
Weeks
   First
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Second
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Third
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Fourth
Quarter
16 Weeks
 Total
52 Weeks
 

REVENUE

            

Net sales

  $16,922   $18,356   $17,385   $23,592   $76,255    $18,823   $20,449   $20,188   $27,588   $87,048  

Membership fees

   377    386    395    533    1,691     416    426    435    590    1,867  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenue

   17,299    18,742    17,780    24,125    77,946     19,239    20,875    20,623    28,178    88,915  

OPERATING EXPENSES

            

Merchandise costs

   15,081    16,396    15,494    21,024    67,995     16,757    18,235(2)   18,067(2)   24,680(2)   77,739  

Selling, general and administrative

   1,777    1,873(1)   1,789    2,401    7,840     1,941    2,038    1,991    2,712    8,682  

Preopening expenses

   11    3    3    9    26     12    4    8    22    46  

Provision for impaired assets and closing costs, net

   2    0    3    3    8     4    2    1    2    9  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income

   428    470    491    688    2,077     525    596    556    762    2,439  

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

            

Interest expense

   (24  (26  (27  (34  (111   (26  (27  (27  (36  (116

Interest income and other, net

   18    30    10    30    88     5    4    5    46    60  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   422    474    474    684    2,054     504    573    534    772    2,383  

Provision for income taxes

   152    169    163    247    731     172    204    193    272    841  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   270    305    311    437    1,323     332    369    341    500    1,542  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (4  (6  (5  (5  (20   (20  (21  (17  (22  (80
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TOCOSTCO

  $266   $299   $306   $432   $1,303    $312   $348   $324   $478   $1,462  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COSTCO:

            

Basic

  $0.61   $0.68   $0.69   $0.99   $2.97    $0.72   $0.80   $0.74   $1.09   $3.35  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  $0.60   $0.67   $0.68   $0.97   $2.92    $0.71   $0.79   $0.73   $1.08   $3.30  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Shares used in calculation (000’s)

            

Basic

   437,173    439,786    440,973    437,071    438,611     434,099    436,682    436,977    436,596    436,119  

Diluted

   444,849    446,918    448,391    444,289    445,970     441,360    443,186    443,570    443,518    443,094  

Dividends per share

  $0.180   $0.180   $0.205   $0.205   $0.77    $0.205   $0.205   $0.240   $0.240   $0.89  

 

(1)

As discussed in Note 1, the Company began consolidating Mexico on August 30, 2010.

(2)

Includes a $22 charge related$6, $49, and $32 increase to merchandise costs for a change in employee benefits whereby certain unused time off will now be paid annually to our employees.LIFO inventory adjustment for the second, third and fourth quarters, respectively. (See note 1—Merchandise Inventories).

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in millions, except share data) (Continued)

 

Note 13—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Continued)

 

  52 Weeks Ended August 30, 2009   52 Weeks Ended August 29, 2010 
  First
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Second
Quarter

12 Weeks
 Third
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Fourth
Quarter
16 Weeks
 Total 52
Weeks
   First
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Second
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Third
Quarter
12 Weeks
 Fourth
Quarter
16 Weeks
 Total
52 Weeks
 

REVENUE

            

Net sales

  $16,036   $16,488   $15,477   $21,888   $69,889    $16,922   $18,356   $17,385   $23,592   $76,255  

Membership fees

   359    355    329(2)   490    1,533     377    386    395    533    1,691  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenue

   16,395    16,843    15,806    22,378    71,422     17,299    18,742    17,780    24,125    77,946  

OPERATING EXPENSES

            

Merchandise costs

   14,276    14,771    13,776    19,512    62,335     15,081    16,396    15,494    21,024    67,995  

Selling, general and administrative

   1,677    1,666    1,655    2,254    7,252     1,777    1,873(3)   1,789    2,401    7,840  

Preopening expenses

   13    7    9    12    41     11    3    3    9    26  

Provision for impaired assets and closing costs, net

   7    1    7    2    17     2    0    3    3    8  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income

   422    398    359    598    1,777     428    470    491    688    2,077  

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

            

Interest expense

   (25  (25  (25  (33  (108   (24  (26  (27  (34  (111

Interest income and other, net

   21    12    6    19    58     18    30    10    30    88  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   418    385    340    584    1,727     422    474    474    684    2,054  

Provision for income taxes

   152    142    128    206    628     152    169    163    247    731  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   266    243    212    378    1,099     270    305    311    437    1,323  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (3  (4  (2  (4  (13   (4  (6  (5  (5  (20
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TOCOSTCO

  $263   $239   $210   $374   $1,086    $266   $299   $306   $432   $1,303  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

ATTRIBUTABLE TO COSTCO:

            

Basic

  $0.61   $0.55   $0.48   $0.86   $2.50    $0.61   $0.68   $0.69   $0.99   $2.97  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  $0.60   $0.55   $0.48   $0.85   $2.47    $0.60   $0.67   $0.68   $0.97   $2.92  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Shares used in calculation (000’s)

            

Basic

   432,451    433,476    434,354    435,255    433,988     437,173    439,786    440,973    437,071    438,611  

Diluted

   440,533    439,688    439,997    441,699    440,454     444,849    446,918    448,391    444,289    445,970  

Dividends per share

  $0.160   $0.160   $0.180   $0.180   $0.68    $0.180   $0.180   $0.205   $0.205   $0.77  

 

(2)(3)

Includes a $27 decrease to membership fees$22 charge related to a litigation settlement concerningchange in employee benefits whereby certain unused time off will now be paid annually to our membership renewal policy.employees.

Note 14—Subsequent Event

On October 5, 2011, the Company’s Japanese subsidiary entered into an agreement to issue promissory notes through a private placement, bearing interest at 1.18%. These yen denominated notes are being issued in two series, with separate funding dates: $79 on October 5, 2011 and $52 on December 20, 2011. For both series of notes, interest is payable semi-annually, and principal is due on October 5, 2018. The Company guarantees all financing instruments issued by its Japanese subsidiary.

EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference. Where an exhibit is incorporated by reference, the number that follows the description of the exhibit indicates the document to which cross-reference is made. See the end of this exhibit index for a listing of cross-reference documents.

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

  3.1 

Articles of Incorporation of the registrant(1)

  3.2 

Bylaws of the registrant(14)

  4.1 

Registrant will furnish upon request copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of it’sits long-term debt instruments

10.1* 

Costco Wholesale Executive Health Plan(9)

10.1.1* 

Costco Companies, Inc. 1993 Combined Stock Grant and Stock Option Plan(3)

10.1.2* 

Amendments to Stock Option Plan, 1995(4)

10.1.3* 

Amendments to Stock Option Plan, 1997(5)

10.1.4* 

Amendments to Stock Option Plan, 2000(2)

10.1.5* 

Amendments to Stock Option Plan, 2002(6)

10.1.6* 

Costco Wholesale Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan(6)

10.1.7* 

Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of Costco Wholesale Corporation(8)

10.1.8* 

Second Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement-Employee(10)

10.1.9* 

Second Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement-Non-Executive Director(10)

10.1.10* 

Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan(11)

10.1.11* 

Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan(12)

10.1.12* 

Fourth Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan(15)

10.1.13* 

Fifth Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan(16)

10.2* 

Form of Indemnification Agreement(7)

10.4 

Restated Corporate Joint Venture Agreement between The Price Company, Price Venture Mexico and Controladora Comercial Mexicana S.A. de C.V. dated March 1995(4)

10.4.1

Amendment No. 7 to Restated Corporate Joint Venture Agreement, dated December 2010

10.6.1* 

Executive Employment Agreement between James D. Sinegal and Costco Wholesale Corporation

10.6.2* 

Fiscal 20102011 Executive Bonus Plan(13)

21.1 

Subsidiaries of the Company

23.1 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1 

Rule 13(a) – 14(a) Certifications

32.1 

Section 1350 Certifications

101.INS** 

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

Exhibit No.

 

Description

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL** 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF** 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB** 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE** 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

*

Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

**

Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

 

1.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation on August 30, 1999.

 

2.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Costco Wholesale Corporation for the fiscal year ended September 3, 2000.

 

3.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Price/Costco, Inc. (File No. 33-50359) dated September 22, 1993.

 

4.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Price/Costco, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 3, 1995.

 

5.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Costco Companies, Inc. for the fiscal year ended August 30, 1998.

 

6.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Registration Statement of Costco Wholesale Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82782) dated February 14, 2002.

 

7.

Incorporated by reference to Annex A to Schedule 14A of Costco Wholesale Corporation filed December 13, 1999.

 

8.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Registration Statement filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-129172) dated October 21, 2005.

 

9.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Costco Wholesale Corporation for the fiscal first quarter ended November 20, 2005.

 

10.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Costco Wholesale Corporation for the fiscal third quarter ended May 7, 2006.

 

11.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Costco Wholesale Corporation for the fiscal second quarter ended February 18, 2007.

 

12.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation on January 31, 2008.

 

13.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation on November 16, 2009.15, 2010.

 

14.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation on August 24, 2010.

 

15.

Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Costco Wholesale Corporation for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.

 

16.

Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation on March 17, 2010.

 

8884