UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102012

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

 

Commission File Number Exact name of registrants as specified in their charters 

I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number

001-08489 DOMINION RESOURCES, INC. 54-1229715
001-02255 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY 54-0418825
 

VIRGINIA

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 
 

120 TREDEGAR STREET

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

23219

(Zip Code)

 

(804) 819-2000

(Registrants’ telephone number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange

on Which Registered

DOMINION RESOURCES, INC. 
Common Stock, no par value New York Stock Exchange

2009 Series A 8.375%

Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes

 New York Stock Exchange
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY 

Preferred Stock (cumulative),

$100 par value, $5.00 dividend

 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  x    No  ¨             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  ¨    No  x             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  x    No  ¨             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  x    No  ¨             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  ¨x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Dominion Resources, Inc.    ¨x            Virginia Electric and Power Company    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Dominion Resources, Inc.

 

Large accelerated filer  x Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ¨     Smaller reporting company  ¨

Virginia Electric and Power Company

Large accelerated filer  ¨Accelerated filer  ¨Non-accelerated filer  xSmaller reporting company  ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  ¨    No  x             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of Dominion Resources, Inc. common stock held by non-affiliates of Dominion was approximately $22.3 billion based on the closing price of Dominion’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Dominion is the sole holder of Virginia Electric and Power Company common stock. As of January 31, 2011, Dominion had 580,849,359 shares of common stock outstanding and Virginia Power had 274,723 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

(a) Portions of Dominion’s 2011 Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference in Part III.

This combined Form 10-K represents separate filings by Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company. Information contained herein relating to an individual registrant is filed by that registrant on its own behalf. Virginia Power makes no representations as to the information relating to Dominion’s other operations.


Dominion Resources, Inc. and

Virginia Electric and Power Company

Large accelerated filer  ¨Accelerated filer  ¨Non-accelerated filer  xSmaller reporting company  ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Dominion Resources, Inc.    Yes  ¨    No  x             Virginia Electric and Power Company    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of Dominion Resources, Inc. common stock held by non-affiliates of Dominion was approximately $30.0 billion based on the closing price of Dominion’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of the last day of Dominion’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Dominion is the sole holder of Virginia Electric and Power Company common stock. As of January 31, 2013, Dominion had 576,309,631 shares of common stock outstanding and Virginia Power had 274,723 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

Portions of Dominion’s 2013 Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference in Part III.

This combined Form 10-K represents separate filings by Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company. Information contained herein relating to an individual registrant is filed by that registrant on its own behalf. Virginia Power makes no representations as to the information relating to Dominion’s other operations.


Dominion Resources, Inc. and

Virginia Electric and Power Company

 

Item

Number

      

 

Page

Number

  

  

      

 

Page

Number

  

  

  

Glossary of Terms

   1    

Glossary of Terms

   1  

Part I

Part I

  

Part I

  

1.

  

Business

   5    

Business

   5  

1A.

  

Risk Factors

   22    

Risk Factors

   20  

1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   26    

Unresolved Staff Comments

   24  

2.

  

Properties

   26    

Properties

   24  

3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   29    

Legal Proceedings

   27  

4.

  

(Removed and reserved)

   29    

Mine Safety Disclosures

   27  
  

Executive Officers of Dominion

   30    

Executive Officers of Dominion

   28  

Part II

Part II

  

Part II

  

5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   31    

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   29  

6.

  

Selected Financial Data

   32    

Selected Financial Data

   30  

7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   33    

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   31  

7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   50    

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   50  

8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   53    

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   52  

9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   124    

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   124  

9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   124    

Controls and Procedures (Dominion)

   124  

9B.

  

Other Information

   127    

Other Information

   127  

Part III

Part III

  

Part III

  

10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   127    

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   127  

11.

  

Executive Compensation

   128    

Executive Compensation

   128  

12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   150    

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   151  

13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   150    

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   151  

14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   151    

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   152  

Part IV

Part IV

  

Part IV

  

15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   152    

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   153  


Glossary of Terms

 

The following abbreviations or acronyms used in this Form 10-K are defined below:

 

Abbreviation or Acronym  Definition

2009 Base Rate Review

  

Order entered by the Virginia Commission in January 2009, pursuant to the Regulation Act, initiating reviews of the base rates and terms and conditions of all investor-owned utilities in Virginia

2013 Proxy Statement

Dominion 2013 Proxy Statement, File No. 001-08489

ABO

  

Accumulated benefit obligation

AOCIAES

  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Alternative Energy Solutions

AFUDC

  

Allowance for funds used during construction

AIP

  

Annual Incentive Plan

AMI

Advanced Metering Infrastructure

AMR

  

Automated meter reading program deployed by East Ohio

AnteroAOCI

  

Antero ResourcesAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

AROs

  

Asset retirement obligations

ARP

Acid Rain Program, a market-based initiative for emissions allowance trading, established pursuant to Title IV of the CAA

ASA

  

PrimaryAverage Speed of Answer, a primary metric used to measure customer service Average Speed of Answer

ASLB

  

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

ATEX line

Appalachia to Texas Express ethane line

bcf

  

Billion cubic feet

Bear Garden

  

A 580590 MW intermediate combined cycle, natural gas-fired power station under construction in Buckingham County, Virginia

Biennial Review Order

Order issued by the Virginia Commission in November 2011 concluding the 2009 - 2010 biennial review of Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions

Blue Racer

Blue Racer Midstream, LLC

BOEM

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

BP

  

BP Wind Energy North America Inc.

Brayton Point

  

Brayton Point power station

BREDL

  

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League

Bremo

Bremo power station

BRP

  

Dominion Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

BVPBrunswick County

  

Book Value PerformanceA proposed 1,358 MW combined cycle, natural gas-fired power station in Brunswick County, Virginia

CAA

  

Clean Air Act

Caiman

Caiman Energy II, LLC

CAIR

  

Clean Air Interstate Rule

CAMR

Clean Air Mercury Rule

CAO

  

Chief Accounting Officer

Carson-to-Suffolk line

  

Virginia Power project to construct an approximately 60-mile 500-kV500 kV transmission line in southeastern Virginia

CD&A

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

CDO

Collateralized debt obligation

CEO

  

Chief Executive Officer

CERCLA

  

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980

CD&ACFO

  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

CDEP

Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection

CDO

Collateralized debt obligationChief Financial Officer

CFTC

  

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

CFO

Chief Financial Officer

CGN Committee

  

Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committee of Dominion’s Board of Directors

Chesapeake

Chesapeake power station

CNG

  

Consolidated Natural Gas Company

CNO

  

Chief Nuclear Officer

CO2

  

Carbon dioxide

COL

  

Combined Construction Permit and Operating License

Companies

  

Dominion and Virginia Power, collectively

CONSOL

  

CONSOL Energy, Inc.

COO

  

Chief Operating Officer

Cooling degree days

Units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is greater than 65 degrees Fahrenheit, calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day

Cove Point

  

Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP

CSAPR

Cross State Air Pollution Rule

CWA

  

Clean Water Act

Dallastown

Dallastown Realty

DCI

  

Dominion Capital, Inc.

DD&A

Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense

DEI

  

Dominion Energy, Inc.

Dodd-Frank Act

  

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010

DOE

  

Department of Energy

Dominion

  

The legal entity, Dominion Resources, Inc., one or more of Dominion Resources, Inc.’s consolidated subsidiaries (other than Virginia Power) or operating segments or the entirety of Dominion Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries

1


Glossary of Terms, continued

Abbreviation or AcronymDefinition

Dominion Direct®

  

A dividend reinvestment and open enrollment direct stock purchase plan

Dooms-to-Bremo line

Virginia Power project to rebuild approximately 43 miles of existing 115 kV to 230 kV lines, between the Dooms and Bremo substations

Dooms-to-Lexington line

Virginia Power project to rebuild approximately 39 miles of an existing 500 kV line, between the Dooms and Lexington substations

DPP

  

DominionDominion’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Dresden

Partially-completed merchant generation facility sold in 2007

DRS

  

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

DSM

  

Demand-side management

DTI

  

Dominion Transmission, Inc.

DVP

  

Dominion Virginia Power operating segment

E&P

  

Exploration & production

East Ohio

  

The East Ohio Gas Company, doing business as Dominion East Ohio

ECCPEGWP

  

Energy Conservation Council of PennsylvaniaEmployer Group Waiver Plan

Elwood

  

Elwood power station

Enterprise

  1


Glossary of Terms, continued

Enterprise Product Partners, L.P.

Abbreviation or AcronymDefinition

EPA

  

Environmental Protection Agency

EPACT

  

Energy Policy Act of 2005

EPS

  

Earnings per share

ERISA

  

The Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ERM

Enterprise Risk Management

ERO

  

Electric Reliability Organization

ESRP

  

Dominion Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan

Excess Tax Benefits

Benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock-based compensation

Fairless

  

Fairless power station

FASB

  

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FCM

Futures Commission Merchant

FERC

  

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Fitch

  

Fitch Ratings Ltd.

Fowler Ridge

  

A wind-turbine facility joint venture with BP in Benton County, Indiana

Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan

Dominion Resources, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan

Frozen DSOP

Dominion Resources, Inc. Security Option Plan

FTRs

  

Financial transmission rights

GAAP

  

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

GHG

  

Greenhouse gas

GWSA

  

Global Warming Solutions Act

HAPHarrisonburg-to-Endless Caverns line

  

Hazardous air pollutantVirginia Power project to construct a 20-mile 230 kV line from the Harrisonburg substation to the Endless Caverns substation

Hayes-to-Yorktown line

  

Virginia Power project to construct an approximately eight-mile 230-kV230 kV transmission line in southeastern Virginia

Heating degree days

Units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is less than 65 degrees Fahrenheit, calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day

Hope

  

Hope Gas, Inc., doing business as Dominion Hope

HVACINPO

  

Heating, ventilating and air conditioningInstitute of Nuclear Power Operations

IOGAIRC

  

Independent Oil and Gas Association of West Virginia, Inc.Internal Revenue Code

IRS

  

Internal Revenue Service

ISO

  

Independent system operator

ISO-NE

  

ISO New England

Joint Committee

  

U.S. Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation

June 2006 hybrids

  

2006 Series A Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes due 2066

June 2009 hybrids

  

2009 Series A Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes due 2064, subject to extensions no later than 2079

Juniper

Juniper Capital L.P.

Kewaunee

  

Kewaunee nuclear power station

Kincaid

  

Kincaid power station

kV

  

Kilovolt

kWh

Kilowatt-hour

LIBOR

  

London Interbank Offered Rate

LIFO

  

Last-in-first-out inventory method

LNG

  

Liquefied natural gas

LTIP

  

Long-term incentive program

MACTMATS

  

Maximum Achievable Control TechnologyUtility Mercury and Air Toxics Standard Rule

Manchester Street

  

Manchester Street power station

2


Abbreviation or AcronymDefinition

mcf

million cubic feet

MD&A

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MDE

Maryland Department of the Environment

Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun line

  

Project to construct an approximately 270-mile 500-kVVirginia Power 65-mile 500 kV transmission line that begins in southwestern Pennsylvania, crosses WestWarren County, Virginia and terminates in northernLoudoun County, Virginia of which Virginia Power will construct approximately 65 miles in Virginia and Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company will construct the remainder

Medicare Act

  

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003

Medicare Part D

  

Prescription drug benefit introduced in the Medicare Act

MISOMF Global

  

Midwest Independent Transmission System Operators,MF Global Inc.

MGD

Million gallons a day

Millstone

  

Millstone nuclear power station

MNESMISO

  

Mitsubishi Nuclear Energy Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Midwest Independent Transmission System Operators, Inc.

Moody’s

  

Moody’s Investors Service

Mt. Storm-to-Doubs line

  

Virginia Power project to rebuild approximately 96 miles of an existing 500-kV500 kV transmission line in Virginia and West Virginia

MW

  

Megawatt

MWh

  

Megawatt hour

NAV

Net asset value

NAAQS

  

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NAV

Net asset value

NCEMC

  

North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation

NedPower

  

A wind-turbine facility joint venture with Shell in Grant County, West Virginia

NEIL

  

Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited

NEOs

  

Named executive officers

NERC

  

North American Electric Reliability Corporation

NGLs

  

Natural gas liquids

NO2

  

Nitrogen dioxide

2


Abbreviation or AcronymDefinition

Non-Employee Directors Plan

  

Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan

North Anna

  

North Anna nuclear power station

North Branch

North Branch power station

North Carolina Commission

  

North Carolina Utilities Commission

North Carolina Settlement Approval Order

  

Order issued by the North Carolina Commission in December 2010 approving the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement filed by Virginia Power in connection with the ending of its North Carolina base rate moratorium

NOX

  

Nitrogen oxide

NPDES

  

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

NRC

  

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

NSPS

New Source Performance Standards

NYMEX

  

New York Mercantile Exchange

NYSE

  

New York Stock Exchange

ODEC

  

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative

Ohio Commission

  

Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

OSHA

  

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Peaker facilitiesPBGC

  

Collectively, the three natural gas-fired merchant generation peaking facilities sold in March 2007

Pennsylvania Commission

Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionPension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

Peoples

  

The Peoples Natural Gas Company

Pipeline Safety Act

The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011

PIPP

  

Percentage of Income Payment Plan

PIR

  

Pipeline Infrastructure Replacement program deployed by East Ohio

PJM

  

PJM Interconnection, LLC

PM&P

  

Pearl Meyer & Partners

PNG Companies LLC

  

An indirect subsidiary of Babcock & BrownSteel River Infrastructure Fund North America

ppb

Parts-per-billion

Radnor Heights Project

Virginia Power project to construct three new 230 kV underground transmission lines totaling approximately 6 miles and the associated Radnor Heights substation in Arlington County, Virginia

RCCs

  

Replacement Capital Covenants

RCRA

  

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

Regulation Act

  

Legislation effective July 1, 2007, that amended the Virginia Electric Utility Restructuring Act and fuel factor statute, which legislation is also known as the Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act

REIT

  

Real estate investment trust

RGGI

  

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

Riders C1 and C2Rider A1

  

RateA rate adjustment clausesclause to reduce anticipated over-collected fuel expense for the second half of 2012, effective November 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012

Rider B

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to certain DSM programsthe conversion of three of Virginia Power’s coal-fired power stations to biomass

3


Abbreviation or AcronymDefinition

Rider BW

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to Brunswick County

Rider R

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to Bear Garden

Rider S

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center

Rider T

  

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of certain electric transmission-related expenditures

Rider T1

A rate adjustment clause to recover the difference between revenues produced from current Rider T rates included in base rates, and the new revenue requirement developed for the rate year beginning September 1, 2012

Rider W

A rate adjustment clause associated with the recovery of costs related to Warren County

Riders C1 and C2

Rate adjustment clauses associated with the recovery of costs related to certain DSM programs

Riders C1A and C2A

Rate adjustment clauses associated with the recovery of costs related to certain DSM programs approved in the 2011 DSM case

ROE

  

Return on equity

ROIC

  

Return on invested capital

RPM Buyers

The Maryland Public Service Commission, Delaware Public Service Commission, Pennsylvania Commission, New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and several other organizations representing consumers in the PJM region

RPS

  

Renewable Portfolio Standard

RTEP

  

Regional transmission expansion plan

RTO

  

Regional transmission organization

SAFSTOR

A method of nuclear decommissioning, as defined by the NRC, in which a nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit release for unrestricted use

SAIDI

  

MetricSystem Average Interruption Duration Index, metric used to measure electric service reliability System Average Interruption Duration Index

Salem Harbor

  

Salem Harbor power station

SEC

  

Securities and Exchange Commission

SELC

Southern Environmental Law Center

September 2006 hybrids

  

2006 Series B Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes due 2066

Shell

  

Shell WindEnergy, Inc.

SO2

  

Sulfur dioxide

Standard & Poor’s

  

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

State Line

  

State Line power station

Surry

  

Surry nuclear power station

Surry-to-Skiffes Creek-to-Whealton lines

Virginia Power project to construct a 7-mile 500 kV line from Surry to the proposed Skiffes Creek Switching Station and a 20-mile 230 kV line from the proposed Skiffes Creek Switching Station to the Whealton substation

TGP

  

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

TSR

  

Total shareholder return

UEX Rider

Uncollectible Expense Rider

U.S.

  

United States of America

US-APWRU.S. DOT

  

Mitsubishi Heavy Industry’s Advanced Pressurized Water ReactorUnited States Department of Transportation

UAO

Unilateral Administrative Order

UEX Rider

Uncollectible Expense Rider

VEBA

  

Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association

VIE

  

Variable interest entity

Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center

  

A 585600 MW (nominal) baseload carbon-capture compatible, clean coal powered electric generation facility under construction in Wise County, Virginia

Virginia Commission

  

Virginia State Corporation Commission

3


Abbreviation or AcronymDefinition

Virginia Power

  

The legal entity, Virginia Electric and Power Company, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries or operating segments or the entirety of Virginia Power and its consolidated subsidiaries

Virginia Settlement Approval Order

  

Order issued by the Virginia Commission in March 2010 concluding Virginia Power’s 2009 Base Rate Review

VPDESWarren County

A 1,329 MW combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power station under construction in Warren County, Virginia

Waxpool-Brambleton-BECO line

  

Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

VPP

Volumetric production payment

VSWCB

Virginia State Water Control BoardPower project to construct an approximately 1.5-mile double circuit 230 kV line to a new Waxpool substation, and a new 230 kV line between the Brambleton and BECO substations

West Virginia Commission

  

Public Service Commission of West Virginia

Yorktown

Yorktown power station

 

4    

 


Part I

 

 

 

Item 1. Business

GENERAL

Dominion, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia and incorporated in Virginia in 1983, is one of the nation’s largest producers and transporters of energy. Dominion’s strategy is to be a leading provider of electricity, natural gas and related services to customers primarily in the eastern region of the U.S. Dominion’s portfolio of assets includes approximately 27,61527,500 MW of generating capacity, 6,1006,300 miles of electric transmission lines, 56,80056,900 miles of electric distribution lines, 11,000 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage pipeline and 21,800 miles of gas distribution pipeline, exclusive of service lines of two inches in diameter or less. Dominion also ownsoperates one of the nation’s largest underground natural gas storage system, operatessystems, with approximately 947 bcf of storage capacity, and serves nearly 6 million utility and retail energy customers in 1415 states.

Dominion is focused on expanding its investment in regulated electric generation, transmission and distribution and regulated natural gas transmission and distribution infrastructure within and around its existing footprint. As a result, regulated capital projects will continue to receive priority treatment in its spending plans. Dominion expects this will continue to increase its earnings contribution from regulated operations, while reducing the sensitivity of its earnings to commodity prices.

In 2010, Dominion announced plans to invest more than $10 billion over the next five yearscontinues to expand and improve its regulated electric and natural gas businesses.businesses, in accordance with its five-year capital investment program. A substantial portion ofmajor impetus for this investment will be essentialprogram is to meet the anticipated increase in electricity demand in its electric utility service territory. Other drivers for the capital investment program include the need to constructconstruction of infrastructure to handle the expected increase in natural gas production from the Marcellus and Utica Shale formationformations; and upgrades to itsupgrade Dominion’s gas distribution and electric transmission and distribution network. Dominion also announced that it may invest upnetworks. Planned investments to an additional $2 billiongather and process natural gas production from the Utica Shale formation, in its electric generating fleeteastern Ohio and western Pennsylvania, are expected to meet potential new environmental requirements.be made by the newly-formed Blue Racer joint venture.

Dominion’s nonregulated operations include merchant generation, energy marketing and price risk management activities and retail energy marketing operations. Dominion is in the process of transitioning to a more regulated earnings mix as evidenced by its capital investments in regulated infrastructure, as well as dispositions of certain merchant generation facilities during 2012 and its announcement that other merchant generation facilities are expected to be sold or decommissioned in 2013. Dominion’s operations are conducted through various subsidiaries, including Virginia Power.

Virginia Power, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia and incorporated in Virginia in 1909 as a Virginia public service corporation, is a regulated public utility that generates, transmits and distributes electricity for sale in Virginia and North Carolina. In Virginia, Virginia Power conducts business under the name “Dominion Virginia Power.”Power” and primarily serves retail customers. In North Carolina, it conducts business under the name “Dominion North Carolina Power” and serves retail customers located in the northeastern region of the state, excluding certain municipalities. In addition, Virginia Power sells electricity at wholesale prices to rural electric cooperatives, municipalities and into wholesale electricity markets. All of Virginia Power’s common stock is owned by Dominion.

Amounts disclosed for Dominion are inclusive of Virginia Power, where applicable.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had approximately 15,80015,500 full-time employees, of which approximately 5,9005,800 employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. As of December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power had approximately 6,800 full-time employees, of which approximately 3,0003,100 employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. See Note 23 for discussion of the Companies’ workforce reduction program.

 

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Dominion and Virginia Power’s principal executive offices are located at 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 and their telephone number is (804) 819-2000.

 

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT DOMINIONAND VIRGINIA POWER

Dominion and Virginia Power file their annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Their SEC filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document they file at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.

Dominion and Virginia Power make their SEC filings available, free of charge, including the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, through Dominion’s internet website, www.dom.com, as soon as practicable after filing or furnishing the material to the SEC. You may also request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing or telephoning Dominion at: Corporate Secretary, Dominion, 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219, Telephone (804) 819-2000. Information contained on Dominion’s website is not incorporated by reference in this report.

 

 

ACQUISITIONSANDDISPOSITIONS

Following are significant divestitures by Dominion and Virginia Power during the last five years. There were no significant acquisitions by either registrant during this period.

SALEOF E&P PROPERTIES

In 2010, Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations, including its rights to associated Marcellus acreage, to a newly-formed subsidiary of CONSOL for approximately $3.5 billion. See Note 43 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

In 2007, Dominion completed the sale of its non-Appalachian natural gas and oil E&P operations and assets for approximately $13.9 billion.

In 2006, Dominion received approximately $393 million of proceeds from sales of certain gas and oil properties, primarily resulting from the sale of certain properties located in Texas and New Mexico.

5


The historical results of the non-Appalachian E&P operations are included in the Corporate and Other segment. The historical results of the Appalachian E&P operations are included in the Dominion Energy segment.

SALEOF PEOPLES

In February 2010, Dominion completed the sale of Peoples to PNG Companies LLC and netted after-tax proceeds of approximately $542 million. The historical results of these operations are included in the Corporate and Other segment and presented in discontinued operations. See Note 43 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

5


ASSIGNMENTOF MARCELLUS ACREAGE

In 2008, Dominion completed a transaction with Antero Resources to assign drilling rights to approximately 117,000 acres in the Marcellus Shale formation located in West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Dominion received proceeds of approximately $347 million. Under the agreement, Dominion received a 7.5% overriding royalty interest on future natural gas production from the assigned acreage. The overriding royalty interest was transferred to CONSOL as part of the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations in 2010.

SALEOF MERCHANT FACILITIES

In March 2007, Dominion sold three Peaker facilities for net cash proceeds of $254 million. The Peaker facilities included the 625 MW Armstrong facility in Shelocta, Pennsylvania; the 600 MW Troy facility in Luckey, Ohio; and the 313 MW Pleasants facility in St. Mary’s, West Virginia. The results of these operations were presented in discontinued operations.

SALEOF DRESDEN

In September 2007, Dominion completed the sale of Dresden to AEP Generating Company for $85 million.

SALEOFCERTAIN DCIDCI OPERATIONS

In March 2008, Dominion reached an agreement to sell its remaining interest in the subordinated notes of a third-party CDO entity held as an investment by DCI and in April 2008 received proceeds of $54 million, including accrued interest. As discussed in Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Dominion deconsolidated the CDO entity as of March 31, 2008.

In August 2007, Dominion completed the sale of Gichner, LLC, all of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of Gichner, Inc. (an affiliate of Gichner, LLC) and Dallastown for approximately $30 million.

 

 

OPERATING SEGMENTS

Dominion manages its daily operations through three primary operating segments: DVP, Dominion Generation and Dominion Energy. Dominion also reports a Corporate and Other segment, which includes its corporate, service company and other functions (including unallocated debt) and the net impact of Peoples and certain DCI operations that are expected to be or are currently discontinued, which areis discussed in Notes 4 and 25Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.Statements. In addition, Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s operating segments that are not included in profit

measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

Virginia Power manages its daily operations through two primary operating segments: DVP and Dominion Generation. It also reports a Corporate and Other segment that primarily includes specific items attributable to its operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

While daily operations are managed through the operating segments previously discussed, assets remain wholly-owned by Dominion and Virginia Power and their respective legal subsidiaries.

A description of the operations included in the Companies’ primary operating segments is as follows:

 

Primary Operating

Segment

 Description of Operations Dominion  Virginia
Power
 

DVP

 Regulated electric distribution  X    X  
 Regulated electric transmission  X    X  
  

Nonregulated retail energy marketing (electric and gas)

  X      

Dominion Generation

 Regulated electric fleet  X    X  
  Merchant electric fleet  X      

Dominion Energy

 Gas transmission and storage  X   
 Gas distribution and storage  X   
 LNG import and storage  X   
  Producer services  X      

For additional financial information on operating segments, including revenues from external customers, see Note 2725 to the

Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information on operating revenue related to Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s principal products and services, see Notes 2 and 54 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

DVP

The DVP Operating Segment of Virginia Power includes Virginia Power’s regulated electric transmission and distribution (including customer service) operations, which serve approximately 2.5 million residential, commercial, industrial and governmental customers in Virginia and North Carolina.

In December 2010, Virginia PowerDVP has announced its five-year investment plan, which includes spending approximately $4$4.5 billion from 2013 through 2017 to upgrade or add new transmission and distribution lines, substations and other facilities to meet growing electricity demand within its service territory and maintain reliability. The proposed electric delivery infrastructure projects are intended to address both continued populationcustomer growth and increases in electricity consumption by the typical consumer. In addition, data centers continue to contribute to anticipated demand growth, with an expected load of approximately 715 MW by the end of 2013.

Revenue provided by electric distribution operations is based primarily on rates established by state regulatory authorities and state law. ChangesVariability in revenue areearnings is driven primarily by changes in rates, weather, customer growth and other factors impacting consumption such as the economy and energy conservation. Variabilityconservation, in earnings results from changes in rates, weather, the economy, customer growth andaddition to operating and maintenance expenditures. Operationally, electric distribution continues to focus on improving service levels while striving to reduce costs and link investments to operational results. As a result, electric

6


service reliability and customer service have improved. SAIDI, excluding major storm events, has also steadily improved. The three-year average SAIDI has improved from 135125 minutes at the end of 20052007 to 114105 minutes at the end of 2010.2012. Likewise, ASA has also shown significant improvement. The three-year average ASA has improved from 7357 seconds at the end of 20052007 to 4238 seconds at the end of 2010.2012. Customer service options are also beingcontinue to be enhanced and expanded through the use of technology. Customers now have the ability to use the Internet for routine billing and payment transactions, connecting and disconnecting service, reporting outages and obtaining outage updates. AsAdditionally, customers can follow progress of electric distribution moves forward,service restoration efforts following major outages by accessing Facebook or Twitter. In the future, safety, electric service reliability and customer service will remain key focal areas.areas for electric distribution.

Revenue provided by Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations is based primarily on rates approved by FERC. The profitability of this business is dependent on its ability, through the rates it is permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on its capital investments. Variability in earnings primarily results from changes in rates and the timing of property additions, retirements and depreciation.

Virginia Power is a member of PJM, an RTO, and its electric transmission facilities are integrated into PJM wholesale electricity markets. Consistent with the increased authority given to NERC by EPACT, Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations are committed to meeting NERC standards, modernizing theirits infrastructure and maintaining superior system reliability. Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations will continue to focus on

6


safety, operational performance, NERC compliance and execution of PJM’s RTEP.

The DVP Operating Segment of Dominion includes all of Virginia Power’s regulated electric transmission and distribution operations as discussed above, as well as Dominion’s nonregulated retail energy marketing operations.

Dominion’s retail energy marketing operations compete in nonregulated energy markets and have continued to experience customer growth during the past few years.markets. The retail business requires limited capital investment and currently employs approximately 160190 people. The retail customer base includes 2.1 million customer accounts and is diversified across three product lines—naturallines-natural gas, electricity and home warrantyenergy-related products and services. In natural gas, Dominion has a heavy concentration of natural gas customers in markets where utilities have a long-standing commitment to customer choice. In electricity, Dominion pursues customers in electricity markets where utilities have divested of generation assets and where customers are permitted and have opted to purchase from the market. Major growth drivers are net customer additions, new markets, productsmarket penetration, product development and expanded sales channels and supply optimization.

COMPETITION

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Within Virginia Power’s service territory in Virginia and North Carolina, there is no competition for electric distribution service. Additionally, since its electric transmission facilities are integrated into PJM, electric transmission services are administered by PJM and are not subject to competition in relation to transmission service provided to customers within the PJM region. Virginia Power is seeing continued growth in new customers in its transmission and distribution operations. In its Order 1000 compliance filing, PJM has proposed tariff changes that, if approved by FERC, could allow certain transmission facilities to be constructed in Virginia Power’s service territory by entities other than Virginia Power beginning in 2013.

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion

Dominion’s retail energy marketing operations compete against incumbent utilities and other energy marketers in nonregulated energy markets for natural gas and electricity. Customers in these markets have the right to select a retail marketer and typically do so based upon price savings or price stability; however, incumbent utilities have the advantage of long-standing relationships with their customers and greater name recognition in their markets.

REGULATION

Virginia Power’s electric retail service, including the rates it may charge to jurisdictional customers, is subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission. Virginia Power’s wholesale electric transmission rates, tariffs and terms of service are subject to regulation by FERC. Electric transmission siting authority remains the jurisdiction of the Virginia and North Carolina Commissions. However, EPACT provides FERC with certain backstop authority for transmission siting. SeeState Regulations andFederal Regulations inRegulation and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The Virginia General Assembly enacted legislation in April 2007 that institutedinformation, including a modified cost-of-service rate model for the Virginia jurisdiction of Virginia Power’s utility operations, subject to base rate caps in effect through December 31, 2008. Pursuant to this legislation, the Virginia Commission initiated a review of Virginia Power’s base rates in 2009. A discussion of Virginia Power’s settlement of this case with the Virginia Commission is contained inElectric Regulation in Virginia underRegulation.2011 Biennial Review Order.

PROPERTIES

Virginia Power has approximately 6,1006,300 miles of electric transmission lines of 69 kV or more located in the states of North Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. Portions of Virginia Power’s electric transmission lines cross national parks and forests under permits entitling the federal government to use, at specified charges, any surplus capacity that may exist in these lines. While Virginia Power owns and maintains its electric transmission facilities, they are a part of PJM, which coordinates the planning, operation, emergency assistance and exchange of capacity and energy for such facilities.

Each year, as part of PJM’s RTEP process, reliability projects are authorized. In December 2012, Virginia Power is involved in twocompleted construction of the major construction projectsHayes-to-Yorktown line at a total project cost of $79 million. This previously authorized in 2006, which arePJM project was designed to improve the reliability of service to customers and the region—Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun and Carson-to-Suffolk.

In October 2008,region. Previously approved PJM-authorized reliability projects such as the Virginia Commission authorized construction ofWaxpool-Brambleton-BECO line ($49 million), the Meadow Brook-to-LoudounHarrisonburg-to-Endless Caverns line and affirmed($66 million) the 65-mile route proposed for the line which is adjacent to, or within, existing transmission line rights-of-way. The Virginia Commission’s approval of the Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun line was conditioned on the respective state commission approvals of both the West Virginia and Pennsylvania portions of the transmission line. The West Virginia Commission’s approval of Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company’s application became effective in February 2009Radnor Heights Project ($81 million), and the Pennsylvania Commission granted approval in December 2008. On appeal by the ECCP, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed in May 2010 the Pennsylvania Commission’s approvalDooms-to-Bremo line ($65 million) continue to progress and subsequently denied a request for reargument by the ECCP in June 2010. The Meadow

7


Brook-to-Loudoun line is expected to cost approximately $255 million and be completed in June 2011.

In October 2008, the Virginia Commission authorized the construction of the Carson-to-Suffolk line. This project is estimated to cost $224 million and isare expected to be completed in June 2011.on time.

As part of subsequent annual PJM RTEP processes, PJM authorized additional electric transmission upgrade projects including Hayes-to-Yorktown in December 2008 and Mt. Storm-to-Doubs in December 2010. In June 2010, the Virginia Commission authorized the construction of the Hayes-to-Yorktown line along the proposed eight-mile route utilizing existing easements and property previously acquired for the transmission line right-of-way. In accordance with the Virginia Commission’s approval, approximately 4.2 miles of the Hayes-to-Yorktown line will be constructed overhead and approximately 3.8 miles will be installed underground in order to cross under the York River. The Hayes-to-Yorktown line is expected to cost approximately $63 million and, subject to receipt of all regulatory approvals, is expected to be completed by June 2012.

After more than 44 years of operation, portions of the 99-mile Mt. Storm-to-Doubs line ($350 million) in December 2010 and certain associated facilities are approaching the end of their expected service lives and require replacement with new facilitiesSurry-to-Skiffes Creek-to-Whealton lines ($155 million) in 2012. Also approved as a reliability project in 2012 was the Dooms-to-Lexington line ($112 million). See Note 13 to maintain reliable service. Virginia Power owns and has been designated by PJM to rebuild the 96 miles of the line in West Virginia and Virginia, and The Potomac Edison Company owns and has been designated by PJM to rebuild the remaining three miles of the line in Maryland. Subject to applicable state and federal regulatory approvals, Virginia Power’s portion of the rebuild project is expected to cost approximately $300 million and is expected to be completed by June 2015.Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding electric transmission projects.

In addition, Virginia Power’s electric distribution network includes approximately 56,80056,900 miles of distribution lines, exclusive of service level lines, in Virginia and North Carolina. The grants for most of its electric lines contain rights-of-way that have been obtained from the apparent ownerowners of real estate, but underlying titles have not been examined. Where rights-of-way have not been obtained, they could be acquired from private owners by condemnation, if necessary. Many electric lines are on publicly-owned property, where permission to operate can be revoked.

SOURCESOF ENERGY SUPPLY

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

DVP’s supply of electricity to serve Virginia Power customers is produced or procured by Dominion Generation. SeeDominion Generation for additional information.

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion

The supply of electricity to serve Dominion’s retail energy marketing customers is procured through market wholesalers and RTO or ISO transactions. DVP’sThe supply of gas to serve itsDominion’s retail energy marketing customers is procured through market wholesalers or by Dominion Energy. SeeDominion Energy for additional information.

SEASONALITY

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

DVP’s earnings vary seasonally as a result of the impact of changes in temperature, the impact of storms and other cata-

7


strophic weather events, and the availability of alternative sources for heating on demand by residential and commercial customers.

Generally, the demand for electricity peaks during the summer and winter months to meet cooling and heating needs. An increase in heating degree-daysdegree days for DVP’s electric utilityelectric-utility related operations does not produce the same increase in revenue as an increase in cooling degree-days,degree days, due to seasonal pricing differentials and because alternative heating sources are more readily available.

DVP Operating Segment—Dominion

The earnings of Dominion’s retail energy marketing operations also vary seasonally. Generally, the demand for electricity peaks during the summer and winter months to meet cooling and heating needs, while the demand for gas peaks during the winter months to meet heating needs.

Dominion Generation

The Dominion Generation Operating Segment of Virginia Power includes the generation operations of the Virginia Power regulated electric utility and its related energy supply operations. Virginia Power’s utility generation operations primarily serve the supply requirements for the DVP segment’s utility customers. The generation mix is diversified and includes coal, nuclear, gas, oil and renewables. The generation facilities of Virginia Power’s electric utility fleet are located in Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina. As discussed inProperties, Virginia Power has plans to add additional generation capacity to satisfy future growth in its utility service area.

Earnings for the Generation operating segment of Virginia Power primarily result from the sale of electricity generated by its utility fleet. Revenue is based primarily on rates established by state regulatory authorities and state law. Approximately 80% of revenue comes from serving Virginia jurisdictional customers. Rates for the Virginia jurisdiction are set using a modified cost-of-service rate model, subject to base rate caps that were in effect through December 31, 2008.model. The cost of fuel and purchased power is generally collected through fuel cost-recovery mechanisms established by regulators and does not materially impact net income. Variability in earnings for Virginia Power’s generation operations results from changes in rates, the demand for services, which is primarily weather dependent, and labor and benefit costs, as well as the timing, duration and costs of scheduled and unscheduled outages. SeeRegulation—State RegulationsElectric Regulation in Virginia underRegulation and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information, including a discussion of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case settlement with the Virginia Commission.information.

The Dominion Generation Operating Segment of Dominion includes Virginia Power’s generation facilities and its related energy supply operations described above as well as the generation operations of Dominion’s merchant fleet and energy marketing and price risk management activities for these assets. The generation facilities of Dominion’s merchant fleet are located in Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The Generation

8


operating segment of Dominion derives its earnings primarily from the sale of electricity generated by Virginia Power’s utility and Dominion’s merchant generation assets, as well as from associated capacity from Dominion’s merchant generation assets.and ancillary services.

Variability in earnings provided by Dominion’s merchant fleet relates to changes in market-based prices received for electricity and capacity. Market-based prices for electricity are largely dependent on commodity prices, primarily natural gas, and the demand for electricity, which is primarily dependent upon weather. Capacity prices are dependent upon resource requirements in relation to the supply available (both existing and new) in the forward capacity auctions, which are held approximately three years in advance of the associated delivery year. Dominion manages electric and capacity price volatility of its merchant fleet by hedging a substantial portion of its expected near-term sales with

derivative instruments and also entering into long-term power sales agreements. However, earnings have been adversely impacted due to a sustained decline in commodity prices. This sustained decline in power prices in conjunction with Dominion’s regular strategic review of its portfolio of assets has led to its decision to pursue the sale or retirement of certain merchant generation assets, which is discussed in more detail below. Variability also results from changes in the cost of fuel consumed, labor and benefits and the timing, duration and costs of scheduled and unscheduled outages.

COMPETITION

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Virginia Power’s generation operations are not subject to significant competition as only a limited number of its Virginia jurisdictional electric utility customers have retail choice. SeeRegulation—State Regulations—ElectricRegulation-State Regulations-Electric for more information. Currently, North Carolina does not offer retail choice to electric customers.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion

Unlike Dominion Generation’s regulated generation fleet, its merchant generation fleet is dependent on its ability to operate in a competitive environment and does not have a predetermined rate structure that allows for a rate of return on its capital investments. Competition for the merchant fleet is impacted by electricity and fuel prices, new market entrants, construction by others of generating assets and transmission capacity, technological advances in power generation, the actions of environmental and other regulatory authorities and other factors. These competitive factors may negatively impact the merchant fleet’s ability to profit from the sale of electricity and related products and services.

Dominion Generation’s merchant generation fleet owns and operates several facilities in the Midwest that operate within functioning RTOs. A significant portion of the output from these facilities is sold under long-term contracts, with expiration dates ranging fromthe majority of which expire between December 31, 2012 to Augustand December 31, 2017,2013, and is therefore largely unaffected by price competition during the termterms of these contracts. Following expirationIt was announced during the third quarter of 2012 that Dominion would pursue the sale of these contracts, earnings couldMidwest assets, excluding its wind facilities. In the fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced that Kewaunee is expected to be adversely impacted if prevailing prices for energy, capacity and ancillary services are lower than the levels currently received under these contracts.decommissioned beginning in 2013.

Dominion Generation’s other merchant assets also operate within functioning RTOs and primarily compete on the basis of price. Competitors include other generating assets bidding to operate within the RTOs. These RTOs have clearly identified

market rules that ensure the competitive wholesale market is functioning properly. Dominion Generation’s merchant units have a variety of short- and medium-term contracts, and also compete in the spot market with other generators to sell a variety of products including energy, capacity and ancillary services. It is difficult to compare various types of generation given the wide range of fuels, fuel procurement strategies, efficiencies and operating characteristics of the fleet within any given RTO. However, Dominion applies its expertise in operations, dispatch and risk management to maximize the degree to which its merchant fleet is competitive compared to similar assets within the region.

8


REGULATION

Virginia Power’s utility generation fleet and Dominion’s merchant generation fleet are subject to regulation by FERC, the NRC, the EPA, the DOE, the Army Corps of Engineers and other federal, state and local authorities. Virginia Power’s utility generation fleet is also subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission. SeeState Regulations andFederal Regulations inRegulation for more information.

PROPERTIES

For a listing of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s existing generation facilities, see Item 2. Properties.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

The generation capacity of Virginia Power’s electric utility fleet totals 17,708 MW. The generation mix is diversified and includes coal, nuclear, gas, oil, hydro and renewables. Virginia Power’s generation facilities are located in Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina and serve load in Virginia and northeastern North Carolina.

Based on available generation capacity and current estimates of growth in customer demand in its utility service area, Virginia Power will need additional generation capacity over the next decade. Virginia Power has announced a comprehensive generation growth program, referred to asPowering Virginia, which involves the development, financing, construction and operation of new multi-fuel, multi-technology generation capacity to meet the anticipated growing demand in its core market in Virginia. Significant projects under construction or development include:are set forth below:

Ÿ 

Bear Garden,In February 2012, the Virginia Commission authorized the construction of Warren County which once operational, will generate about 580 MW. This intermediate, combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power station and transmission interconnection line is estimated to cost $619 million,approximately $1.1 billion, excluding financing costs. ConstructionIt is approximately 94% complete as of January 2011, with commercial operations expected to generate approximately 1,329 MW of electricity when operational. Commercial operations are scheduled to commence by late 2014. In connection with the air permit process for Warren County, Virginia Power reached an agreement to permanently retire North Branch, a 74 MW coal-fired plant located in West Virginia, once Warren County begins commercial operations. During the secondfourth quarter of 2011.2012, Virginia Power sold North Branch to a salvage company that plans to demolish the station and resell the land.

Ÿ 

Virginia Power is converting three coal-fired Virginia generating stations to biomass, a renewable energy source. The Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center locatedconversions of the power stations in WiseAltavista, Hopewell and Southampton County Virginia, which once operational, will generate about 585 MW. The baseload facility is estimatedincrease Dominion’s renewable generation by more than 150 MW and are expected to cost $1.8 billion,approximately $157 million, excluding financing costs. Construction is approximately 79% complete as of January 2011,activities have started at all three sites, and commercial operationsthese conversions are expected to commence inbe complete by the summerend of 2012.2013.

Ÿ 

A power station development project in Warren County, Virginia, intended to be developed as an intermediate, combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power station. In December 2010, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality approved an air permit to construct the project. Subject to the receipt of additionalcertain regulatory approvals, the projectVirginia Power plans to construct Brunswick County, which is expected to generate more than 1,300approximately 1,358 MW of electricity.when operational. If the project is approved, construction would begin in 2012, with commercial operations are expected to commence by late 2014 or early 2015.in 2016, at an estimated cost of approximately $1.3 billion, excluding financing costs. A

 

conditional use permit has been approved to allow for construction of the plant. Brunswick County would offset the expected reduction in capacity caused by the planned retirement of coal-fired units at Chesapeake and Yorktown by 2015 primarily due to the cost of compliance with MATS.

Ÿ 9

Subject to the necessary regulatory approvals, Virginia Power plans to convert Bremo Units 3 and 4 from coal to natural gas. This project would preserve the 227 MW of capacity from the units and is expected to cost approximately $53 million, excluding financing costs. The conversion process is expected to be complete in 2014 in compliance with the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center air permit.

The Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center located in Wise County, Virginia started commercial operations in July 2012. The summer capacity of this clean coal generating facility is approximately 600 MW. The project cost was approximately $1.8 billion, excluding financing and supplemental costs.


In addition to the projects above, Virginia Power is considering the construction of a third nuclear unit at a site located at North Anna, which Virginia Power owns along with ODEC. Virginia Power and ODEC have obtained an Early Site Permit for the North Anna site from the NRC. In November 2007, Virginia Power, along with ODEC, filed an application with the NRC for a COL that references a specific reactor design and which would allow Virginia Power to build and operate a new nuclear unit at North Anna. In May 2010, Virginia Power announced its decision to replace the reactor design previously selected for the potential third nuclear unit with the US-APWR technology.

In June 2010, Virginia Power and ODEC amended the COL application to reflect the selection of the US-APWR technology. In January 2011, Virginia Power and the DOE terminated their cooperative agreement to share equally the cost of developing a COL. The agreement references the technology previously selected by Virginia Power. DOE funding is not available under the agreement for activities relatedSee Note 13 to the US-APWR technology. During the third and fourth quarters of 2010, Virginia Power filed several applicationsConsolidated Financial Statements for environmental permits that would be needed to support future construction and operation of a third nuclear unit at North Anna.

Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit at North Anna. In October 2010, Virginia Power announced its decision to slow the development of the potential third reactor. Virginia Power will continue to pursue the COL, along with engineering and preliminary site development work, and will reassess a construction schedule prior to the issuance of the COL currently anticipated in 2013. In December 2010, Virginia Power and MNES reached an agreement regarding pre-construction, engineering, design and planning work in preparation for a possible new unit at North Anna. In February 2011, ODEC informed Virginia Power of its intent to no longer participate in the development of the new unit at North Anna. Virginia Power and ODEC are currently working together to finalize the terms and conditions of such withdrawal.

If Virginia Power decides to build the new unit, it must first receive a COL from the NRC, the approval of the Virginia Commission and certain environmental permits and other approvals. The NRC is required to conduct a hearing in all COL proceedings. In August 2008, the ASLB of the NRC permitted BREDL to intervene in the proceeding. All of BREDL’s previous contentions inmore information on this proceeding have been dismissed. In October 2010, BREDL submitted two new contentions that it seeks to litigate that Virginia Power has opposed. No other persons sought to intervene in the proceeding. Absent additional admitted contentions, the mandatory NRC hearing will be uncontested with respect to other issues.project.

In April 2008, Virginia Power announced a joint effort with BP to evaluate wind energy projects in Virginia. In December 2010, Virginia Power and BP terminated their joint development agreement for wind energy projects. As a result of the termination, Virginia Power has acquired a sole development interest in several wind energy development projects in Virginia. Virginia Power paid BP approximately $1.5 million to acquire BP’s interest in property jointly owned in Tazewell County, Virginia.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion

Dominion is a 50% owner with BP of the first phase of Fowler Ridge. Phase one has generatingThe generation capacity of 300Dominion’s merchant fleet totals 7,880 MW, and is in full commercial operation. In December 2009, Dominion closed on an agreement with BP to split the 350including 3,954 MW of developmentannounced planned facility divestitures and decommissionings. The remaining generation mix is diversified and includes nuclear, gas, and renewables. Merchant generation facilities are located in Connecticut, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia with a majority of that capacity concentrated in New England.

Dominion continually reviews its portfolio of assets associatedto determine which assets fit strategically and support its objectives to improve ROIC and shareholder value. In connection with the second phase of Fowler Ridge, withthese efforts, previously Dominion retaining 150 MW of these development assets. In December 2010, Dominion reached an agreementhad announced its intention to sell its 150 MW share of the development assets of the second phase to BP. Closing is subject to the approvals of FERCretire State Line and the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, which are expected bySalem Harbor. During the second quarter of 2011.2012, Dominion will receive approximately $6 millionsold State Line, which ceased operations in March 2012, and in August 2012, Dominion completed the sale of proceeds fromSalem Harbor. In the sale.third quarter of 2012, Dominion announced its intention to pursue the sale of its coal-fired merchant power stations, Brayton Point and Kincaid, and its 50% equity method investment in Elwood. In April 2011, Dominion announced the decision to pursue the sale of Kewaunee. In the fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced plans to close and decommission Kewaunee after the company was unable to find a buyer for the nuclear facility. Kewaunee is expected to cease power production in the second quarter of 2013 and commence decommissioning activities.

SOURCESOF ENERGY SUPPLY

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Dominion Generation uses a variety of fuels to power its electric generation and purchases power for utility system load requirements and to satisfy physical forward sale requirements, as described below. Some of these agreements have fixed commitments and are included as contractual obligations inFuture Cash Payments for Contractual Obligations and Planned Capital Expendituresin Item 7. MD&A.

9


Nuclear Fuel—FuelDominion Generation primarily utilizes long-term contracts to support its nuclear fuel requirements. Worldwide market conditions are continuously evaluated to ensure a range of supply options at reasonable prices which are dependent on the market environment. Current agreements, inventories and spot market availability are expected to support current and planned fuel supply needs. Additional fuel is purchased as required to ensure optimal cost and inventory levels.

Fossil Fuel—FuelDominion Generation primarily utilizes coal oil and natural gas in its fossil fuel plants.

Dominion Generation’s coal supply is obtained through long-term contracts and short-term spot agreements from both domestic and international suppliers.

Dominion Generation’s natural gas and oil supply is obtained from various sources including: purchases from major and independent producers in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast regions, purchases from local producers in the Appalachian area, purchases from gas marketers and withdrawals from underground storage fields owned by Dominion or third parties.

Dominion Generation manages a portfolio of natural gas transportation contracts (capacity) that allows flexibility in delivering natural gas to its gas turbine fleet, while minimizing costs.

Purchased Power—PowerDominion Generation purchases electricity from the PJM spot market and through power purchase agreements with other suppliers to provide for utility system load requirements.

Dominion Generation also occasionally purchases electricity from the PJM, ISO-NE and MISO spot markets to satisfy physical forward sale requirements as part of its merchant generation operations.

10


Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Virginia Power

Presented below is a summary of Virginia Power’s actual system output by energy source:

 

  2010
Source
 2009
Source
 2008
Source
 

Coal(1)

   31  33  33
Source  2012 2011 2010 

Nuclear(1)

   33  28  28

Purchased power, net

   29    25    29     27    33    29  

Nuclear(2)

   28    32    31  

Coal(2)

   22    26    31  

Natural gas

   10    9    6     17    12    10  

Other(3)

   2    1    1     1    1    2  

Total

   100  100  100   100  100  100

 

(1)Excludes ODEC’s 11.6% ownership interest in North Anna.
(2)Excludes ODEC’s 50.0% ownership interest in the Clover power station. The average cost of coal for 20102012 Virginia in-system generation was $36.25$33.00 per MWh.
(2)Excludes ODEC’s 11.6% ownership interest in North Anna.
(3)Includes oil, hydro and biomass.

SEASONALITY

Sales of electricity for Dominion Generation typically vary seasonally as a result of the impact of changes in temperature and the availability of alternative sources for heating on demand by residential and commercial customers. Generally, the demand for electricity peaks during the summer and winter months to meet cooling and heating needs. An increase in heating degree-daysdegree days does not produce the same increase in revenue as an increase in cooling degree-days,degree days, due to seasonal pricing differentials at Virginia Power and because alternative heating sources are more readily available.

NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING

In June 2011, the NRC amended its regulations to improve decommissioning planning. As applied to the operators of nuclear power plants, these amendments require licensees to conduct operations in a manner minimizing introduction of residual radioactivity into the site, perform additional surveys, and maintain records of their results. In addition, the amendments make minor changes to financial assurance methods and require additional information on decommissioning and spent fuel management costs after a plant permanently ceases operations. The revised regulations became effective in December 2012 and did not significantly affect the decommissioning cost estimates or funding for Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s units.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion and Virginia Power

Virginia Power has a total of four licensed, operating nuclear reactors at Surry and North Anna in Virginia.

Decommissioning involves the decontamination and removal of radioactive contaminants from a nuclear power station once operations have ceased, in accordance with standards established by the NRC. Amounts collected from ratepayers and placed into trusts have been invested to fund the expected future costs of decommissioning the Surry and North Anna units.

Virginia Power believes that the decommissioning funds and their expected earnings for the Surry and North Anna units will be sufficient to cover expected decommissioning costs, particularly when combined with future ratepayer collections and contributions to these decommissioning trusts, if such future collections and contributions are required. This reflects the long-term investment horizon, since the units will not be decommissioned for decades, and a positive long-term outlook for trust fund investment returns. Virginia Power will continue to monitor these trusts to ensure they meet the NRC’sNRC minimum financial assurance requirement, which may include the use of parent company guarantees, surety bonding or other financial guarantees recognized by the NRC.

The total estimated cost to decommission Virginia Power’s four nuclear units is $2.2 billionreflected in 2010 dollarsthe table below and is primarily based upon site-specific studies completed in 2009. These cost studies are generally completed every four years. The current cost estimates assume decommissioning activities will begin shortly after cessation of operations, which will occur when the operating licenses expire. Virginia Power expects to decommission the Surry and North Anna units during the period 2032 to 2067.

Dominion Generation Operating Segment—Dominion

In addition to the four nuclear units discussed above, Dominion has three other licensed, operating nuclear reactors:reactors, two at Millstone in Connecticut and one at Kewaunee in Wisconsin. A third Millstone unit ceased operations before Dominion acquired the power station. In October 2012, Dominion announced that it plans to cease operations at Kewaunee in 2013 and commence decommissioning activities using the SAFSTOR methodology. The planned decommissioning completion date is 2073, which is within the NRC allowed 60 year window.

As part of Dominion’s acquisition of both Millstone and Kewaunee, it acquired decommissioning funds for the related units. Any funds remaining in Kewaunee’s trust after decommissioningdecom-

10


missioning is completed are required to be refunded to Wisconsin ratepayers.

Dominion believes that the amounts currently available in the decommissioning trusts and their expected earnings will be sufficient to cover expected decommissioning costs for the Millstone and Kewaunee units. Dominion will continue to monitor these trusts to ensure they meet the NRC’s minimumNRC financial assurance requirement,requirements, which may include, if needed, the use of parent company guarantees, surety bonding or other financial guarantees recognized by the NRC. The total estimated cost to decommission Dominion’s eight units is $4.6 billionreflected in 2010 dollarsthe table below and is primarily based upon site-specific studies completed in 2009.2009, with the exception of Kewaunee for which a site-specific study was initiated in 2012 and subsequently finalized in early 2013. For the Millstone and Kewaunee operating units, the current cost estimate assumes decommissioning activities will begin shortly after cessation of operations, which will occur when the operating licenses expire. Millstone Unit 1 is not in serviceSAFSTOR decommissioning status and selected minor decommissioning activities are being performed. This unit will continue to be monitored until full decommissioning activities begin for the remaining Millstone operating units. Dominion expects to start minor decommissioning activities at Millstone Unit 2 in 2035, with full decommissioning of Millstone Units 1, 2 and 3 following the permanent cessation of operations of Millstone Unit 3 during the period 2045 to 2069.

In August 2008, Dominion filed an application with the NRC to renew the Kewaunee operating license. In February 2011, the NRC renewed the operating license, extending Kewaunee’s operation an additional 20 years through 2033. Full decommissioning of Kewaunee is expected during the period 2033 to 2065.

11


The estimated decommissioning costs and license expiration dates for the nuclear units owned by Dominion and Virginia Power are shown in the following table.table:

 

  

NRC

license

expiration

year

   Most
recent
cost
estimate
(2010
dollars)
   Funds in
trusts at
December 31,
2010
   2010
contributions
to trusts
   

NRC

license

expiration

year

   

Most

recent

cost

estimate

(2012

dollars)(1)

   

Funds in

trusts at

December 31,

2012

   

2012

contributions

to trusts

 
(dollars in millions)                                

Surry

                

Unit 1

   2032    $541    $373    $1.1     2032    $496    $429    $0.6  

Unit 2

   2033     562     368     1.2     2033     520     422     0.6  

North Anna

                

Unit 1(1)(2)

   2038     550     298     0.8     2038     432     342     0.4  

Unit 2(1)(2)

   2040     564     280     0.8     2040     443     322     0.3  

Total (Virginia Power)

     2,217     1,319     3.9       1,891     1,515     1.9  

Millstone

                

Unit 1(2)(3)

   n/a     424     317          n/a     455     356       

Unit 2

   2035     651     385          2035     568     444       

Unit 3(3)(4)

   2045     680     374          2045     671     437       

Kewaunee

                      

Unit 1(4)

   2013     658     502          2033     666     578       

Total (Dominion)

     $4,630    $2,897    $3.9       $4,251    $3,330    $1.9  

 

(1)The cost estimates shown above reflect reductions for the expected future recovery of certain spent fuel costs based on the Companies’ contracts with the DOE for disposal of spent nuclear fuel consistent with the reductions reflected in Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning AROs.
(2)North Anna is jointly owned by Virginia Power (88.4%) and ODEC (11.6%). However, Virginia Power is responsible for 89.26% of the decommissioning obligation. Amounts reflect 100%89.26% of the decommissioning cost for both of North Anna’s units.
(2)(3)Unit 1 permanently ceased operations in 1998, before Dominion’s acquisition of Millstone.
(3)(4)Millstone Unit 3 is jointly owned by Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, with a 6.53% undivided interest in Unit 3 owned by Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, who hold a 6.53% undivided interest in Unit 3. Amounts reflect 100%Green Mountain Power Corporation. Decommissioning cost is shown at Dominion’s ownership percentage. At December 31, 2012, the minority owners held approximately $28 million of the decommissioning cost fortrust funds related to Millstone Unit 3.3 that are not reflected in the table above.
(4)Kewaunee Unit 1 original license expiration year is 2013, however, the cost estimate is based on the license renewal expiration year of 2033.

Also see Note 14 and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about AROs and nuclear decommissioning, respectively.

Dominion Energy

Dominion Energy includes Dominion’s regulated natural gas distribution companies, regulated gas transmission pipeline and storage operations, natural gas gathering and by-products extraction activities, and regulated LNG operations.operations and its investment in the Blue Racer joint venture. Dominion Energy also includes producer services, which aggregates natural gas supply, engages in natural gas trading and marketing activities and natural gas supply management and provides price risk management services to Dominion affiliates.

The gas transmission pipeline and storage business serves gas distribution businesses and other customers in the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and Midwest. Included in Dominion’s gas transmission pipeline and storage business is its gas gathering and extraction activity, which sells extracted products at market rates. Dominion’s LNG operations involve the import and storage of LNG at Cove Point and the transportation of regasified LNG to the interstate pipeline grid and mid-Atlantic and Northeast markets. In connection with the recent increase in Eastern U.S. natural gas production, including from the Marcellus and Utica Shale formations, Dominion has requested regulatory authority to operate Cove Point as a bi-directional facility, able to import LNG, and vaporize it as natural gas, and liquefy natural gas and export it as LNG. SeeFuture Issues and Other Matters in MD&A for more information. The Blue Racer joint venture will concentrate on building new gathering, processing, fractionation and NGL transportation assets as the development of the Utica Shale formation increases. Dominion will contribute to the joint venture a network of wet gas gathering assets, the Natrium extraction plant and other assets.

Revenue provided by Dominion’s regulated gas transmission and storage and LNG operations is based primarily on rates established by FERC. Additionally, Dominion receives revenue from firm fee-based contractual arrangements, including negotiated rates, for certain gas transportation, gas storage, LNG storage and regasification services. Dominion’s gas distribution operations serve residential, commercial and industrial gas sales, transportation and transportationgathering service customers. Revenue provided by its gas distribution operations is based primarily on rates established by the Ohio and West Virginia Commissions. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on Dominion’s ability, through the rates it is permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on its capital investments. Variability in earnings results from operating and maintenance expenditures, as well as changes in rates and the

demand for services, which are dependent on weather, changes in commodity prices and the economy.

In October 2008, East Ohio implemented a rate case settlement which began a transition toprovided for a straight-fixed-variable rate design.design for a majority of its customers. Under this rate design, East Ohio recovers a larger portion of its fixed operating costs through a flat monthly charge accompanied by a reduced volumetric base delivery rate. Accordingly, East Ohio’s revenue is less impacted by weather-related fluctuations in natural gas consumption than under the traditional rate design.

Revenue from Dominion’s gas transportation, gas storage and LNG storage and regasification services are largely based on firm, fee-based contractual arrangements.

11


Earnings from Dominion Energy’s nonregulatedproducer services business producer services,are unregulated, and are subject to variability associated with changes in commodity prices. Producer services uses physical and financial arrangements to hedge this price risk.

COMPETITION

Dominion Energy’s gas transmission operations compete with domestic and Canadian pipeline companies. Dominion also competes with gas marketers seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage and other services. Alternative energy sources, such as oil or coal, provide another level of competition. Although competition is based primarily on price, the array of services that can be provided to customers is also an important factor. The combination of capacity rights held on certain long-line pipelines, a large storage capability and the availability of numerous receipt and delivery points along its own pipeline system enable Dominion to tailor its services to meet the needs of individual customers.

Retail competition for gas supply exists to varying degrees in the two states in which Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries operate. In Ohio, there has been no legislation enacted to require supplier choice for residential and commercial natural gas consumers. However, Dominion has offered an Energy Choice program to residential and commercial customers in cooperation withsince October 2000. In January 2013, the Ohio Commission.Commission granted East Ohio’s motion to fully exit the merchant function for its nonresidential customers, beginning in April 2013, which will require those customers to choose a retail supplier or be assigned to one at a monthly variable rate set by the supplier. At December 31, 2012, approximately 1 million of Dominion’s 1.2 million Ohio customers were participating in this Energy Choice Program. West Virginia does not require customer choicecustomers to choose their provider in its retail natural gas markets at this time. SeeRegulation—State Regulations—GasRegulation-State Regulations-Gas for additional information.

REGULATION

Dominion Energy’s natural gas transmission pipeline, storage and LNG operations are regulated primarily by FERC. Dominion Energy’s gas distribution service, including the rates that it may charge customers, is regulated by the Ohio and West Virginia Commissions. SeeState Regulations andFederal Regulations inRegulation for more information.

PROPERTIES

Dominion Energy’s gas distribution network is located in the states of Ohio and West Virginia. This network involves approximately 21,800 miles of pipe, exclusive of service lines of two inches in diameter or less. The rights-of-way grants for many natural gas pipelines have been obtained from the actual ownerowners of real estate, as underlying titles have been examined. Where rights-of-way have not been obtained, they could be acquired from private owners by condemnation, if necessary. Many natural gas pipelines are on publicly-owned property, where company rights and actions are determined on a case-by-case basis, with

12


results that range from reimbursed relocation to revocation of permission to operate.

Dominion Energy has approximately 11,000 miles of gas transmission, gathering and storage pipelines located in the states of Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. Dominion Energy operates gas processing and fractionation facilities in West Virginia with a total processing capacity of

267,000 mcf per day and fractionation capacity of 582,000 gallons per day. Dominion Energy also operates 20 underground gas storage fields located in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia, with almost 2,000 storage wells and approximately 262,000349,000 acres of operated leaseholds.

The total designed capacity of the underground storage fields operated by Dominion Energy is approximately 947 bcf. Certain storage fields are jointly-owned and operated by Dominion Energy. The capacity of those fields owned by Dominion’s partners totals about 242 bcf. Dominion Energy also has about 15 bcf of above-ground storage capacity at Cove Point. Dominion Energy has about 123133 compressor stations with more than 768,000832,000 installed compressor horsepower.

In July 2008, East Ohio launched the PIR program to replace approximately 20% of its 21,000-mile pipeline system. The project, which is anticipated to cost approximately $2.6 billion, primarily involves the replacement of East Ohio’s bare steel, cast iron, wrought iron and copper pipe over a 25-year period. As part of this program, East Ohio will assume ownership of curb-to-meter service lines and will be responsible for line repairs or replacement. In October 2008, the Ohio Commission approved cost recovery for an initial five-year period of the PIR program.

In 2006, FERC approved the proposed expansion of Dominion’s Cove Point terminal and2012, DTI pipeline and the commencement of construction of the project. The expansion project included the installation of two new LNG storage tanks at Dominion’s Cove Point terminal, each capable of storing 160,000 cubic meters of LNG, pumps, gas-turbine generators, and vaporization capacity to increase the terminal send-out by 800,000 dekatherms per day. Dominion installed 48 miles of 36-inch pipeline to increase the terminal take-away capacity to approximately 1,800,000 dekatherms per day. In addition, Dominion’s DTI gas pipeline and storage system was expanded by building approximately 120 miles of pipeline, two new compressor stations in Pennsylvania and upgrades to other compressor stations in West Virginia and New York. The DTI facilities associated with the Cove Point expansion project were placed into service in December 2008, the Cove Point LNG terminal expansion was placed into service in January 2009 and the remainder of the expanded Cove Point facilities were placed into commercial service in March 2009.

In March 2010, Dominion commenced construction of the Cove Point Pier Reinforcement Project. The $50 million project is intended to upgrade, expand and modify the existing pier at the Cove Point terminal to accommodate the next generation of LNG vessels (up to 267,000 cubic meters) that are much larger than what can currently be accommodated (no larger than 148,000 cubic meters). The project commenced with the south berth being taken temporarily out of service to accommodate construction activities. In October 2010, Dominion requested and received FERC authorization to re-commence service from the south berth of the pier for vessels with cargo capacities of no greater than 148,000 cubic meters. When the south berth was returned to service, construction commenced on the north berth, which was taken out of service. In December 2010, Dominion

requested and received authorization to place the project in service on January 21, 2011.

DTI has announcedcompleted the Gathering Enhancement Project, a $253$200 million expansion of its natural gas gathering, processing and liquids facilities in West Virginia. The project is designed to increase the efficiency and reduce high pressures in its gathering system, thus increasing the amount of natural gas local producers can move through DTI’s West Virginia system. Construction started in 2009 and is expected to be

In September 2012, DTI completed by the fourth quarter of 2012. The cost of the project will be paid for by rates charged to producers.

DTI has also announced the proposed development of the Keystone Connector Project, a joint venture with The Williams Companies that would transport new natural gas supplies from the Appalachian Basin to Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation’s Station 195, providing access to markets throughout the eastern U.S. DTI is currently in discussions regarding the continued development of the Keystone Connector Project. Project timing is subject to producer drilling plans in the Appalachian Basin, as well as customer demand throughout the mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions.

DTI has announced the proposed development of a gas pipeline project, known as the$575 million Appalachian Gateway Project. The project is expected to provideprovides approximately 484,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation services for new Appalachian gas supplies from the supply areas in the Appalachian Basin in West Virginia and southwestern Pennsylvania to an interconnection with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP at Oakford, Pennsylvania. Plans call for construction to start in 2011, with transportation services to begin by September 2012. An open season concluded in September 2008 and the project is fully subscribed under long-term binding agreements. In June 2010, DTI filed a certificate application with the FERC seeking approval for the Appalachian Gateway project. DTI estimates the cost of the Appalachian Gateway project to be approximately $634 million.

In June 2010,November 2012, DTI entered into a 15-year firm transportation agreement withcompleted the gas subsidiary of CONSOL.$97 million Northeast Expansion Project. The project known as the Northeast Expansion Project, is expected to provideprovides approximately 200,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation services for CONSOL’s Marcellus Shale natural gas production from various receipt points in central and southwestern Pennsylvania to a nexus of market pipelines and storage facilities in Leidy, Pennsylvania. The $97 million project will involve the construction by DTI of new compression facilities at three existing compressor stations in central Pennsylvania, subject to the receipt of regulatory approval.

In November 2010,2012, DTI filed a certificate application with FERC seeking approval forcompleted the Northeast Expansion Project. If the project$46 million Ellisburg-to-Craigs project. The project’s capacity of approximately 150,000 dekatherms per day is approved, construction is expected to begin in March 2012, with a projected in-service date of November 2012.

In August 2010, DTI entered into a 10-year lease agreement withleased by TGP for firm capacity to move Marcellus shaleShale natural gas supplies from TGP’s 300 Line pipeline system in northern Pennsylvania to its 200 Line pipeline system in upstate New York. The $46

In November 2011, DTI filed a FERC application for approval to construct the $17 million Sabinsville-to-Morrisville project, known as the Ellisburg-to-Craigs Project,a pipeline to move additional Marcellus supplies from a TGP pipeline in northeast Pennsylvania to its line in upstate New York. DTI executed a binding precedent agreement with TGP in October 2010 to provide this firm transportation service up to 92,000 dekatherms per day for a 14-year term. Construction is expected to have capacitycommence in April 2013 with an expected in service date of November 2013.

In December 2012, DTI received FERC authorization for the Allegheny Storage Project, which is expected to provide approximately 150,0007.5 bcf of incremental storage service and 125,000 dekatherms per day.day of associated year-round firm transportation service to three local distribution companies under 15-year contracts. Storage capacity for the project will be provided from storage pool enhancements at DTI and capacity leased from East Ohio. DTI intends to construct additional compression facilities and upgrade measurement and regulation in order to provide 115,000 dekatherms per day of transportation service. The remaining 10,000 dekatherms per day of transportation service will not require construction of additional facilities. The $112 million project is expected to be in service in 2014.

12


In February 2011, DTI concluded a binding open season for its $67 million Tioga Area Expansion Project, which is designed to provide approximately 270,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation service from supply interconnects in Tioga and Potter Counties in Pennsylvania to DTI’s Crayne interconnect with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP in Greene County, Pennsylvania and the Leidy interconnect with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. Two customers have contracted for the service under 15-year terms. DTI filed a certificate application with FERC in November 2011. Subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals, the project will involve the construction by DTI of additional compression facilities and a new measurement and regulating station at the

13


Craigs interconnect with TGPis anticipated to be in New York. DTI filed a certificate application with FERCservice in November 2010. If the Ellisburg-to-Craigs Project is approved, construction is expected to begin in March 2012, with a planned in-service date of November 2012.2013.

In January 2011, Dominion announced that DTI is developingthe development of a natural gas processing and fractionation facility in Natrium, West Virginia, and in July 2011 it executed a contract for the construction of the first phase of the facility. This first phase of the project is fully contracted and is expected to be in service by March 2013. Once completed, the plant and related facilities are expected to be contributed into the Blue Racer joint venture. The Phase 1 costs for processing, fractionation, plant inlet and outlet natural gas transportation, gathering, and various modes of NGL transportation are approximately $550 million.

In May 2012, Dominion began construction of a $125 million pipeline project, which is included in the Natrium cost estimate above. The pipeline is designed to transport approximately 27,000 barrels per day of ethane from the Natrium facility to an interconnect with the ATEX line of Enterprise near New Martinsville,Follansbee, West Virginia. Dominion reachedNGL Pipelines, LLC, a subsidiary of Dominion, owns the 58-mile pipeline and associated equipment. Following the installation of the pipeline and the satisfaction of certain other conditions, Dominion NGL Pipelines, LLC is also expected to be contributed to Blue Racer. The facilities are anticipated to be available the later of January 1, 2014 or the date Enterprise commences operation of the ATEX line. Transportation services on the pipeline will be subject to FERC regulation under the Interstate Commerce Act.

In November 2012, DTI filed a FERC application for approval to construct the $42 million Natrium to Market project. The project is designed to provide 185,000 dekatherms per day of firm transportation from an agreement with PPG Industries, Inc. to purchase 56 acres atinterconnect between DTI and the Natrium site where DTI plansfacility to process natural gasDTI’s interconnect with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP in Greene County Pennsylvania. Four customers have entered into binding precedent agreements for the full project capacity under 8-year and NGLs.13-year terms. Subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals, the project is anticipated to be in service in November 2014.

In 2008, East Ohio began PIR, aimed at replacing approximately 20% of its pipeline system. The $2.7 billion, 25-year program is ongoing. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about PIR.

SOURCESOF ENERGY SUPPLY

Dominion Energy’s natural gas supply is obtained from various sources including purchases from major and independent producers in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast regions, local producers in the Appalachian area and gas marketers. Dominion’s large underground natural gas storage network and the location of its pipeline system are a significant link between the country’s major interstate gas pipelines including the Rockies Express East pipeline, and large markets in the Northeast

and mid-Atlantic regions. Dominion’s pipelines are part of an interconnected gas transmission system, which provides access to supplies nationwide for local distribution companies, marketers, power generators and industrial and commercial customers.

Dominion’s underground storage facilities play an important part in balancing gas supply with consumer demand and are essential to serving the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions. In addition, storage capacity is an important element in the effective management of both gas supply and pipeline transmission capacity.

SEASONALITY

Dominion Energy’s natural gas distribution business earnings vary seasonally, as a result of the impact of changes in temperature on demand by residential and commercial customers for gas to meet heating needs. Historically, the majority of these earnings have been generated during the heating season, which is generally from November to March,March; however implementation of the straight fixed variablestraight-fixed-variable rate design at East Ohio has reduced the earnings impact of weather-related fluctuations. Demand for services at Dominion’s pipeline and storage business can also be weather sensitive. Commodity prices can be impacted by seasonal weather changes, the effects of unusual weather events on operations and the economy. Dominion’s producer services business is affected by seasonal changes in the prices of commodities that it transports, stores and actively markets and trades.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and Other Segment—Virginia Power

Virginia Power’s Corporate and Other segment primarily includes certain specific items attributable to its operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

Corporate and Other Segment—Dominion

Dominion’s Corporate and Other segment includes its corporate, service company and other functions (including unallocated debt) and the net impact of Peoplesoperations that are expected to be and certain DCI operations,are currently discontinued, which

are is discussed in Notes 4 and 25Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.Statements. In addition, Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY

Dominion and Virginia Power are committed to being good environmental stewards. Their ongoing objective is to provide reliable, affordable energy for their customers while being environmentally responsible. The integrated strategy to meet this objective consists of five major elements:

Ÿ 

Compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules;

Ÿ 

Conservation and load management;

Ÿ 

Renewable generation development;

Ÿ 

Other generation development to maintain fuel diversity, including clean coal, advanced nuclear energy, and natural gas; and

Ÿ 

Improvements in other energy infrastructure.

13


This strategy incorporates Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s efforts to voluntarily reduce GHG emissions, which are described below. SeeGlobal Climate ChangeDominion Generation—Properties underRegulation—Environmental Regulations in this item for examplesmore information on certain of the Companies’ effortsprojects described below, as well as other projects under current development. In addition to reduce their impact on the environment.environmental strategy described above, Dominion formed the AES department in April 2009 to conduct research in the renewable and alternative energy technologies sector and to support strategic investments to advance Dominion’s degree of understanding of such technologies.

Environmental Compliance

Dominion and Virginia Power remain committed to compliance with all applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules related to their operations. Additional information related to Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s environmental compliance obligationsmatters can be found inFuture Issues and Other Mattersin Item 7. MD&A and in Note 2322 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Conservation and Load Management

Conservation plays a significant role in meeting the growing demand for electricity. The Regulation Act provides incentives for energy conservation and sets a voluntary goal for Virginia to reduce electricity consumption by retail customers in 2022 by ten percent of the amount consumed in 2006 through the implementation of conservation programs. Legislation in 2009 added definitions of peak-shaving and energy efficiency programs, and allowed for a margin on operating expenses and revenue reductions related to energy efficiency programs.

Virginia Power’s DSM programs provide the firstimportant incremental steps toward achieving the voluntary ten percent energy conservation goal.

Virginia Power continues to assess smart grid technologies through a demonstration designed to indicate how these technologies may enhance Virginia Power’s electric distribution system by allowing energy to be delivered more efficiently. The demonstration involves a limited deployment, within Virginia Power’s Virginia service territory, of smart meters that use digital technology to enable two-way communication between the meter and Virginia Power’s electric distribution system. Dependent upon the outcome of the demonstration and certain regulatory proceedings, Virginia Power may make a significant investment in replacing existing meters with Advanced Metering Infrastructure. The technology is intended to help customers monitor and control their energy use. It is also expected to lead to more efficient

14


use of the power grid, which is expected to result in energy savings and lower environmental emissions.

Additionally, the conservation and load management plan includes the following DSM programs, which were approved by the Virginia Commission in March 2010 and rolled out in May 2010:

Ÿ 

Residential Lighting Program—an instant, in-store discount on the purchase of qualifying compact fluorescent lights; this program ended in Virginia on December 31, 2011;

Ÿ 

Home Energy Improvement—Residential Low Income Program—free energy auditsaudit for income-qualifying customers, which identifies, installs improvements and improvements for homes of low-income customers;suggests additional implementation measures that will help these customers save money on energy bills;

Ÿ 

Smart Cooling Rewards—Residential Air Conditioner Cycling Program—incentives for residential customers who voluntarily enroll to allow Virginia Power to cycle their central air conditioners and heat pumpspump systems during periods of peak demand;periods;

Ÿ 

Commercial HVACHeating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade Program—incentives for commercial customers to improve the energy efficiency of their heating and/or cooling units; and

Ÿ 

Commercial Lighting Program—incentives for commercial customers to install energy-efficient lighting.

In September 2011, Virginia Power has also proposed a redesigned distributed generationfiled an application for approval of several DSM programs and for additional funding for the approved Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs, in addition to requesting annual recovery of DSM program which was not approved in its original form bycosts. In April 2012, the Virginia Commission in 2010.approved the following programs:

Ÿ

Commercial Energy Audit Program—an on-site energy audit providing commercial customers information to evaluate potential energy cost savings options;

Ÿ

Commercial Duct Testing & Sealing—an incentive for commercial customers to seal duct and air distribution systems to improve system efficiency;

Ÿ

Commercial Distributed Generation—a program for customers to operate their on-site back-up generators when requested by Virginia Power during periods of peak demand; and

Ÿ

Residential Bundle Program—a bundle of four residential programs to be available to qualifying residential customers, including the Residential Home Energy Check-up Program, Residential Duct Testing & Sealing Program, Residential Heat Pump Tune-Up Program and Residential Heat Pump Upgrade Program.

The Virginia Commission denied additional funding for the Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs. As a result, Virginia Power plansbegan winding down these programs in the second quarter of 2012. These two programs are no longer available in Virginia.

In August 2012, Virginia Power filed an application for approval to seekextend two residential DSM programs (the Air Conditioner Cycling program and the Low Income program) beyond April 30, 2013 for periods of five years and two years, respectively. Virginia CommissionPower also filed for approval of the redesigned distributed generationupdated rate adjustment clauses for DSM program cost recovery, and several other DSM programs in 2011.for Electric Vehicle Pilot Program cost recovery. This case is pending.

In September 2010, Virginia Power filed with the North Carolina Commission an application for approval and its initial request for cost recovery of the five DSM programs listed above,initially approved in Virginia in 2010, as well as the redesigned distributed generation program. In February 2011, the North Carolina Commission approved the five DSM programs listed above.approved in Virginia, and Virginia Power subsequently launched the residential lighting program in May 2011 and the remainder of the approved Virginia DSM programs in June 2011. The Residential Lighting Program ended in North Carolina on December 31, 2011. In a separate order issued in September of 2011, the North Carolina Commission will make a decision regarding the appropriate rate making treatment for the programs in a separate proceeding.denied approval of Virginia Power’s proposed distributed generation program.

In August 2011, Virginia Power expects to launchfiled with the North Carolina Commission an application for approval and its updated request for cost recovery of the five DSM programs within itsapproved in North Carolina, service territory inas well as the second quarter ofthen-pending distributed generation program. In December 2011, subject to cost recovery approval by the North Carolina Commission.Commission approved updated cost recovery for the five DSM programs, as Virginia Power withdrew its cost recovery request for the distributed generation program. In a separate order issued in August 2012, the North Carolina Commission approved Virginia Power’s request for approval ofto suspend the redesigned distributed generation program remains pending beforeCommercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs which had been wound down and closed in Virginia.

In August 2012, Virginia Power filed with the North Carolina Commission.Commission an application for approval and its updated request for cost recovery for the five DSM programs approved in North Carolina, as well as cost recovery for projected costs of Commercial Lighting and Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs on a North Carolina-only basis. In December 2012, the North Carolina Commission approved updated cost recovery for the five DSM programs, and requested an additional filing on whether the Commercial Lighting and the

14


Commercial Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Upgrade programs will be offered on a North Carolina-only basis. Virginia Power made this additional filing in February 2013.

Virginia Power continues to evaluate opportunities to redesign current DSM programs and develop new DSM initiatives in Virginia and North Carolina.

Virginia Power is currently evaluating the effectiveness and benefits of installing AMI meters on homes and businesses throughout Virginia. The AMI meter demonstrations test the effectiveness of AMI meters in achieving voltage conservation, remotely turning off and on electric service, power outage and restoration detection and reporting, remote daily meter readings and offering dynamic rates. The AMI meter demonstrations are an on-going project that will help Virginia Power to further evaluate the technology and verify the potential impacts to its system.

Renewable Generation

Renewable energy is also an important component of a diverse and reliable energy mix. Both Virginia and North Carolina have passed legislation setting targets for renewable power. Virginia Power is committed to meeting Virginia’s goals of 12% of base year electric energy sales from renewable power sources by 2022, and 15% by 2025, and North Carolina’s RPS of 12.5% by 2021. In May 2010, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s participation in the state’s RPS program. As a participant, Virginia Power is permitted to seek recovery, through rate adjustment clauses, of the costs of programs designed to meet RPS goals. Virginia Power plans to meet the respective RPS targets in Virginia and North Carolina by utilizing existing renewable facilities, as well as the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center, which is expected to use at least 10% biomass.through additional renewable generation. In addition, Virginia Power intends to purchase renewable energy certificates, as permitted by each RPS program, to help meet any remaining annual requirement needs.needs, as well as to fund renewable energy research and development initiatives at Virginia institutions of higher education. Virginia Power continues to explore opportunities to develop new renewable facilities within its service territory, the energy attributes of which would potentially qualify for inclusion in the RPS programs.

In June 2010, Virginia Power announced its plansis converting three coal-fired Virginia generating power stations to develop an integrated solar and battery storage demonstration project in

Halifax County, Virginia.biomass, which will increase Dominion’s renewable generation by more than 150 MW. The proposed facility is intendedconversions are expected to manage, store, and optimize solar energy to regulate intermittency, enable peak shaving and increase grid reliability.be completed by the end of 2013. In November 2010,2012, the Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission approved a $5 million grant to help fund the proposed project. Other project participants are the Halifax County Industrial Development Authority, the University of Virginia and a battery storage manufacturer. Subject to approval by the Virginia Commission and final project development, the 4 MW facility is expectedvoluntary demonstration program for Company-owned solar distributed generation facilities, to be operationallocated at selected commercial, industrial and community locations throughout its Virginia service territory.

Dominion has invested in 2013.

In addition,wind energy through two joint ventures. Dominion is a 50% owner with Shell of NedPower. Dominion’s share of this project produces 132 MW of renewable energy.

Dominion is also a 50% owner with BP of the first phase of Fowler Ridge, which has a generating capacity of 300 MW. Dominion has a long-term agreement with Fowler Ridge to purchase 200 MW of energy, capacity and environmental attributes from this first phase. In December 2010, Dominion reached an agreement

See Note 13 to sell its remaining share of the development assets of the second phase of Fowler Ridge to BP.Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Other Generation Development

Virginia Power has announced a comprehensive generation growth program, referred to asPowering Virginia, which involves the development, financing, construction and operation of new

multi-fuel, multi-technology generation capacity to meet the anticipated growth in demand in its core market of Virginia. Virginia Power expects that these investments collectively will provide the following benefits: expanded electricity production capability, increased technological and fuel diversity and a reduction in the CO2 emission intensity of its generation fleet. One component of thePowering Virginia program involves consideration of the extent to which Virginia Power can reduce the carbon intensity of its generation fleet by developing generation facilities with zero CO2 and low CO2 emissions, as well as economically viable facilities that can be equipped for CO2 capture and storage. There are six generally recognized GHGs including CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons, and perfluorocarbons. The focus is on new generation because there is no current economically viable technological solution to retro-fit existing fossil-fueled technology to capture and store GHG emissions. Given that new generation units have useful lives of up to 55 years, Virginia Power will consider CO2 and other GHG emissions when making these long-term decisions. SeeDominion Generation—Properties for more information.

Improvements in Other Energy Infrastructure

In December 2010, Virginia Power announced itsPower’s five-year investment plan which includes spending approximately $4 billionsignificant capital expenditures to upgrade or add new transmission and distribution lines, substations and other facilities to meet growing electricity demand within its service territory and maintain reliability. These enhancements are primarily aimed at meeting Virginia Power’s continued goal of providing reliable service, and are intended to address both continued population growth and increases in electricity consumption by the typical consumer. An additional benefit will be added capacity to efficiently deliver electricity from the renewable projects now being developed or to be developed in the

15


future. SeeGlobal Climate Change underRegulation—Environmental Regulations in this item for more information.

Virginia Power is taking measures to ensure that its electrical infrastructure can support the expected demand from electric vehicles, which have significantly lower carbon intensity than conventional vehicles. Virginia Power has partnered with Ford Motor Company to help prepare Virginia for the operation of electric vehicles, in a collaboration that involves consumer outreach, educational programs and the exchange of information on vehicle charging requirements. In July 2011, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s application to establish an Electric Vehicle Pilot Program, including two experimental and voluntary electric vehicle rate options.

Dominion, in connection with its five-year growth plan, is also pursuing the construction or upgrade of regulated infrastructure in its natural gas business.

Dominion and Virginia Power’s Strategy for Voluntarily Reducing GHG Emissions

While Dominion and Virginia Power have not established a standalone GHG emissions reduction target or timetable, they are actively engaged in voluntary reduction efforts, as well as working toward achieving required RPS standards established by existing state regulations, as set forth above. The Companies have an integrated voluntary strategy for reducing overall GHG emission intensity that is based on maintaining a diverse fuel mix, including nuclear, coal, gas, oil, hydro and renewable energy, investing in renewable energy projects and promoting energy conservation and efficiency efforts. Below are some of the Companies’ efforts that have or are expected to reduce the Companies’ overall carbon emissions or intensity:

Ÿ

Since 2000, Dominion has added approximately 3,300 MW of non-emitting generation and over 5,000 MW of lower-emitting natural gas-fired generation, including over 3,000 MW at Virginia Power, to its generation mix.

Ÿ

Virginia Power added 83 MW of renewable biomass and is converting three coal-fired power stations to biomass, which is anticipated to be considered carbon neutral by regulatory agencies.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has requested approval from the Virginia Commission to convert Bremo Units 3 and 4 from coal to natural gas.

15


Ÿ

Dominion has over 800 MW of wind energy in operation or development.

Ÿ

Virginia Power is constructing the natural gas-fired Warren County power station.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has filed an application with the Virginia Commission for approval to construct an additional combined-cycle natural gas-fired power station and related transmission interconnection facilities in Brunswick County.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has stated that coal-fired units at Chesapeake and Yorktown are planned to be retired by 2015.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has received an Early Site Permit from the NRC for the possible addition of approximately 1,500 MW of nuclear generation in Virginia. Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has developed and implemented the DSM programs described above.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has initiated a demonstration of smart grid technologies as described above.

Ÿ

In October 2011, Virginia Power announced plans to develop a community solar power program.

Ÿ

In 2012, Dominion sold Salem Harbor and State Line, two coal-and fuel oil-fired facilities.

Ÿ

In the third quarter of 2012, Dominion announced its intention to pursue the sale of its coal-fired merchant power stations, Brayton Point and Kincaid.

Ÿ

In December 2012, Dominion announced its plans to develop a 15 MW fuel cell power generating facility in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

While Virginia Power’s new Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center, which started commercial operations in July 2012, is a new source of GHG emissions, Virginia Power has taken steps to minimize the impact on the environment. The new plant is expected to use at least 10% biomass for fuel and is designed to be carbon-capture compatible, meaning that technology to capture CO2 can be added to the station if or when it becomes commercially available. It is currently estimated that the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center will have the potential to emit about 4.8 million metric tonnes of direct CO2 emissions in a year assuming a 100% capacity factor and 100% coal-fired operation. Actual emissions will depend on the capacity factor of the facility and the extent to which biomass is burned.

Dominion also developed a comprehensive GHG inventory for calendar year 2011. For Dominion Generation, Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s direct CO2 equivalent emissions, based on equity share (ownership), were approximately 42.1 million metric tonnes and 25.9 million metric tonnes, respectively, in 2011. The decrease in emissions from 2010 to 2011 is proportional to a decrease in generated MW, due mainly to lower demand and milder weather in 2011. For the DVP operating segment’s electric transmission and distribution operations, direct CO2 equivalent emissions for 2011 stayed the same as in 2010 at 0.2 million metric tonnes. For 2011, DTI’s (including Cove Point) direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 1.2 million metric tonnes and East Ohio’s direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 1.1 million metric tonnes. The emissions appear to have decreased significantly compared to previous year’s inventories. These differences may not be comparable, however, due to a change in calculation methodologies required under the

EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98. Dominion’s GHG inventory now follows all methodologies specified in the EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98 for calculating emissions.

Since 2000, the Companies have tracked the emissions of their electric generation fleet. Their electric generation fleet employs a mix of fuel and renewable energy sources. Comparing annual year 2000 to annual year 2011, Dominion and Virginia Power’s electric generating fleet (based on ownership percentage) reduced their average CO2 emissions rate per MWh of energy produced from electric generation by about 29% and 18%, respectively. During such time period, the capacity of Dominion and Virginia Power’s electric generation fleet has grown. The Companies do not yet have final 2012 emissions data.

Alternative Energy Initiatives

The AES department conducts research in the renewable and alternative energy technologies sector and supports strategic investments to advance Dominion’s degree of understanding of such technologies. AES participates in federal and state policy development on alternative energy and identifies potential alternative energy resource and technology opportunities for Dominion’s business units. For example, in December 2012, Virginia Power was selected by the DOE to begin negotiations for initial engineering, design and permitting work for a wind turbine demonstration facility approximately 24 miles off the coast of Virginia. The proposed 12 MW grid-connected facility would generate power via two turbines mounted on foundations driven into the ocean floor. In March 2011, Dominion issued a report evaluating high-voltage underwater transmission lines from Virginia Beach into the ocean to support multiple offshore wind farms; the first of many steps with the goal being the development of a transmission line making offshore wind resources available to its customers. A 2010 Dominion study of its existing transmission system in eastern Virginia showed that it is possible to interconnect large scale wind facilities up to an installed capability of 4,500 MW.

In 2012, Dominion continued to enhance and refine its EDGE® grid-side efficiency product suite. EDGE® is a modular and adaptive conservation voltage management solution enabling utilities to deploy incremental grid-side energy management that requires no behavioral changes or purchases by end customers. In February 2013, Dominion was awarded a patent relating to the EDGE® technology.

 

 

REGULATION

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission, North Carolina Commission, SEC, FERC, EPA, DOE, NRC, Army Corps of Engineers and other federal, state and local authorities.

16


State Regulations

ELECTRIC

Virginia Power’s electric utility retail service is subject to regulation by the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission.

Virginia Power holds certificates of public convenience and necessity which authorize it to maintain and operate its electric facilities now in operation and to sell electricity to customers. However, Virginia Power may not construct or incur financial commitments for construction of any substantial generating facilities or large capacity transmission lines without the prior approval of various state and federal government agencies. In addition, the Virginia Commission and the North Carolina Commission regulate Virginia Power’s transactions with affiliates, transfers of certain facilities and the issuance of certain securities.

Electric Regulation in Virginia

Prior toThe enactment of the Regulation Act whichin 2007 significantly changed electricityelectric service regulation in Virginia Virginia Power’s Virginia jurisdictional base rates wereby instituting a modified cost-of-service rate model. With respect to be capped at 1999 levels until December 31, 2010, at which time Virginia was to convertmost classes of customers, the Regulation Act ended Virginia’s planned transition to retail competition for its electric supply service. The Regulation Act ended cappedBase rates two years early, on December 31, 2008, at which time retail competition was made available only to individual retail customers withare set by a demand of more than 5 MW and non-residential retail customers who obtain Virginia Commission approval to aggregate their load to reach the 5 MW threshold. Individual retail customers are also permitted to purchase renewable energy from competitive suppliers if their incumbent electric utility does not offer a 100% renewable energy tariff.

The Regulation Act also authorizes stand-alone rate adjustment clauses for recovery of costs for new generation projects, FERC-approved transmission costs, environmental compliance, conservation and energy efficiency programs and renewable energy programs. The Regulation Act provides for enhanced returns on capital expenditures on specific new generation projects, including but not limited to nuclear generation, clean coal/carbon capture compatible generation and renewable generation projects. The Regulation Act also continues statutory provisions directingprocess that allows Virginia Power to file annual fuel cost recovery cases withrecover its operating costs and an ROIC. The Virginia Commission reviews Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions for generation and distribution services on a biennial basis in a proceeding that involves the determination of Virginia Power’s actual earned ROE during a combined two-year historic test period, and the determination of Virginia Power’s authorized ROE prospectively. If, as a result of the earnings test review, the Virginia Commission.

Pursuant toCommission determines that Virginia Power’s historic earnings for the two-year test period are more than 50 basis points above the authorized level, 60% or 100% of earnings above this level must be shared with customers through a refund process. Under certain circumstances described in the Regulation Act, the Virginia Commission entered anmay also order in January 2009 initiating the 2009 Base Rate Review. In connection with the 2009 Base Rate Review, Virginia Power submitteda base rate filings and accompanying schedules toincrease or reduction during the biennial review. Circumstances where the Virginia Commission during 2009. In February 2010, Virginia Power filedmay order a revised Stipulation and Recommendation withbase rate decrease include a determination by the Virginia Commission which had the supportthat Virginia Power has exceeded its authorized level of all of the interested parties, including the Staff of the Virginia Commission. Virginia Power’s fourth quarter 2009 results included a charge of $782 million ($477 million after-tax) representing its best estimate at the time of the probable outcome of the 2009 Base Rate Review. In March 2010, the Virginia Commission issued the Virginia Settlement Approval Order that concluded the 2009 Base Rate Review and resolved open issues relating to Virginia Power’s fuel factor and Rider T. An ROE issue relating to Riders R, S, C1 and C2 was also resolved.

The Virginia Settlement Approval Order included the following provisions:

Credits from 2008 Revenues

Ÿ

Credits to customers of $400 million from Virginia Power’s 2008 revenues to be applied against base rates and rider charges.

Base Rates

Ÿ

No change in Virginia Power’s base rates in existence prior to September 1, 2009 until December 1, 2013 (unless emergency rate relief is warranted by statute);

Ÿ

Refund increased revenues collected under the interim base rates since September 1, 2009; and

Ÿ

An ROE of 11.9% (inclusive of a performance incentive of 60 basis points) for use in the Virginia Commission’s assessment in the upcoming biennial rate review of Virginia Power’s earnings.

FTR Credits

Ÿ

Credits to customers of $129 million, inclusive of any carrying charge, relating to revenues from FTRs for the period July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2009.

Generation Riders R and S

Ÿ

An ROE of 12.3% (inclusive of a 100 basis point statutory enhancement) for the 2010 rate year.

Transmission Rider T

Ÿ

Waiver of recovery, effective January 1, 2011, of deferred RTO start-up and administrative costs in the amount of $197 million (including carrying charges) that were previously approved for recovery through Rider T.

DSM Riders C1 and C2

Ÿ

An ROE of 11.3% for the 2010 rate year.

Commencing in 2011, the Virginia Commission will conduct biennial reviews of Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions. In theearnings by more than 50 basis points for two consecutive biennial review as in the 2009 Base Rate Review,periods. Virginia Power’s authorized ROE can be set no lower than the average, for a three-year historic period, of thatthe actual returns reported to the SEC by not less than a majority of comparable utilities within the Southeastern U.S., with certain limitations as described in the Regulation Act. If Virginia Power’s earnings are

16


more thanROE may be increased or decreased by up to 100 basis points based on operating performance criteria, or alternatively, will be increased by 50 basis points abovefor compliance with Virginia’s RPS.

In addition, the authorized level, such earnings will be sharedRegulation Act authorizes stand-alone rate adjustment clauses for recovery of costs for new generation facilities or major unit modifications of existing facilities, FERC-approved transmission costs, environmental compliance, conservation and energy efficiency programs and renewable energy programs. It provides for enhanced returns on capital expenditures relating to the construction or major modification of facilities that are nuclear-powered, clean coal/carbon capture compatible-powered, or renewable-powered, as well as conventional coal and combined-cycle combustion turbine facilities.

Costs of fuel used for the generation of electricity, along with customers.

costs of purchased power, are recovered from customers through an annually approved fuel rider, as provided under a separate section of the Virginia Power previously filed withCode. Decisions of the Virginia Commission an application for approval and cost recovery of eleven DSM programs, including one peak-shaving program and ten energy efficiency programs. Virginia Power plans to use DSM, along with its traditional and renewable supply-side resources, to meet its projected load growth over the next 15 years. The DSM programs provide the first steps toward achieving Virginia’s goal of reducing, by 2022, the electric energy consumption of Virginia Power’s retail customers by ten percent of what was consumed in 2006. In March 2010, the Virginia Commission approved the recovery of approximately $28 million for five of the DSM programs through initiation of Riders C1 and C2, effective May 1, 2010. With respectmay be appealed to the other six DSM programs for which approval was sought, the Virginia Commission made a finding that they were not in the public interest at that time, but allowed Virginia Power the opportunity for further evaluationSupreme Court of similar programs. In July 2010, Virginia Power submitted its annual update filing for Riders C1 and C2 with respect to the five approved DSM programs. The proposed revenue requirements for Riders C1 and C2 were approximately $6 million and $18 million, respectively, which together represent a decrease of approximately $5 million compared to the Riders C1 and C2 revenue requirements included in customer rates currently in effect. In February 2011, an evidentiary hearing was held by the Virginia Commission on Virginia Power’s update of Riders C1 and C2. The Virginia Commission is required to issue its order by March 30, 2011. Virginia Power plans to seek Virginia Commission approval for several DSM programs in 2011. SeeEnvironmental Strategy for a description of Virginia Power’s DSM programs.

In connection with the Bear Garden and Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center projects, in June 2010, Virginia Power filed annual updates for Riders R and S, respectively, with the Virginia Commission. Initially, Virginia Power proposed an approximately $86 million revenue requirement for Rider R for the April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012 rate year. Due to the application of accelerated tax depreciation provisions in the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, passed in September 2010, Virginia Power revised the requested revenue requirement for Rider R in November 2010 from $86 million to $78 million. The adjusted $78 million revenue requirement represents an increase of approximately $14 million over the revenue requirement associated with the Rider R customer rates currently in effect. The proposed Rider S revenue requirement, effective April 1, 2011, for the rate year ending March 31, 2012 is approximately $200 million, which represents an increase of $46 million over the revenue requirement associated with the Rider S customer rates currently in effect. The ROE included in both rider filings is 12.3%, which is consistent with the terms of the Virginia Settlement Approval Order. In July 2010, the Virginia Commission issued orders with respect to Riders R and S, which adopted a placeholder ROE of 11.3% (not including the 100 basis point statutory enhancement) for use until the ROE is determined in the context of Virginia Power’s upcoming biennial review. Evidentiary hearings were held by the Virginia Commission on Riders R and S in December and November 2010, respectively.

The Virginia Commission is required to issue its orders in these proceedings by March 30, 2011.

With respect to Virginia Power’s costs of transmission service, in June 2010, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s annual update to Rider T which was effective September 1, 2010, reflecting the revenue requirement of approximately $338 million recommended by the Virginia Commission Staff and agreed to by Virginia Power. The $338 million revenue requirement reflects an increase of approximately $118 million over the previous revenue requirement.

In April 2010, Virginia Power filed its Virginia fuel factor application with the Virginia Commission. The application requested an annual decrease in fuel expense recovery of approximately $82 million for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. The proposed fuel factor went into effect on July 1, 2010 on an interim basis. An evidentiary hearing on Virginia Power’s application was held in September 2010, and in October 2010, the Virginia Commission issued its final order approving the reduction in Virginia Power’s fuel factor as proposed in its application.Virginia.

If the Virginia Commission’s future rate decisions, including actions relating to Virginia Power’s upcoming biennial review and rate adjustment clause filings, differ materially from Virginia Power’s expectations, it could adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

SeeFuture Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A for changes to the Regulation Act enacted in 2013.

See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Electric Regulation in North Carolina Regulation

Virginia Power’s retail electric base rates in North Carolina are regulated on a cost-of-service/rate-of-return basis subject to North Carolina statutes and the rules and procedures of the North Carolina Commission. North Carolina base rates have been subjectare set by a process that allows Virginia Power to a five-year base rate moratorium, effective as of April 2005. Fuelrecover its operating costs and an ROIC. If retail electric earnings exceed the authorized ROE established by the North Carolina Commission, retail electric rates continued tomay be subject to review and possible reduction by the North Carolina Commission, which may decrease Virginia Power’s future earnings. Additionally, if the North Carolina Commission does not allow recovery of costs incurred in providing service on a timely basis, Virginia Power’s future earnings could be negatively impacted. Fuel rates are subject to revision under annual fuel rate adjustments, with deferred fuel accounting for over- or under-recoveriescost adjustment proceedings.

Virginia Power’s transmission service rates in North Carolina are regulated by the North Carolina Commission as part of fuel costs.Virginia Power’s bundled retail service to North Carolina customers.

In February 2010, in preparation for the end of the five-year base rate moratorium,March 2012, Virginia Power filed an application to increase its base rates and adjust its fuel rates. Virginia Power’s application included a proposal to recover proportionately more of its purchased power energy costs through fuel rates, which are adjusted annually, instead of being recovered in base rates. In August 2010, Virginia Power filed its annual application for a change in its fuel rates, which updated the fuel application of February 2010 to reflect a proposed decrease of approximately $28 million when compared to current fuel rates. Also in August 2010, Virginia Power updated its base rate application to seek a $27 million increase, instead of $29 million as originally proposed.

In September 2010, all parties to the base rate and fuel case except one, which did not oppose the settlement, filed an Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement and requested approval from the North Carolina Commission. In December 2010,with the North Carolina Commission issuedto increase base non-fuel revenues with January 1, 2013 as the North Carolina Settlement Approval Order. The North Carolina Settlement Approval Order authorizes an increase in base revenues of approximately $8 million and a one-year decrease in combined fuel revenues of approximately $32 million when compared to revenues produced from current rates. In addition, the North Carolina Settlement Approval Order permits the recovery through fuel rates of 85% of the net energy costs of power purchases from both PJM and other wholesale suppliers and from the non-utility generators subject to economic dispatch that do not provide actual cost data. The

17


North Carolina Settlement Approval Order authorizes an ROE of 10.7% and a capital structure composed of 49% long-term debt and 51% common equity. Virginia Power does not agree that the foregoing ROE represents its anticipated or actual cost of equity or capital structure, but accepted the resulting revenue requirementproposed effective date for the purpose of a global settlement of disputed issues inpermanent rate revision. See Note 13 to the proceedings. The new base and fuel rates became effective on January 1, 2011.Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

GAS

Dominion’s gas distribution services are regulated by the Ohio Commission and the West Virginia Commission.

Status of Competitive Retail Gas Services

Both of the states in which Dominion has gas distribution operations have considered legislation regarding a competitive deregulation of natural gas sales at the retail level.

OhioSince October 2000, East Ohio has not enacted legislation requiring supplier choice for residential or commercial natural gas consumers. However, in cooperation withoffered the Ohio Commission, Dominion offers retail choice toEnergy Choice program, under which residential and commercial customers. At December 31, 2010, approximately 1 million of Dominion’s 1.2 million Ohio customers were participating in this Energy Choiceare encouraged to purchase gas directly from retail suppliers or through a community aggregation program. In October 2006, East Ohio implemented a pilot program approvedrestructured its commodity service by the Ohio Commission as a transitional step towards the improvement and expansion of the Energy Choice program. Under the pilot program, East Ohio enteredentering into gas purchase contracts with selected suppliers at a fixed price above the NYMEX month-end settlement. Thissettlement and passing that gas cost to customers under the Standard Service Offer pricing mechanism replaced the traditional gas cost recovery rate with a monthly market price that eliminated the true-up adjustment, making it easier for customers to compare and switch to competitive suppliers if they so choose.

In June 2008, the Ohio Commission approved a settlement filed in response to East Ohio’s application seeking approval of Phase 2 of its plan to restructure its commodity service. Under that settlement, the existing Standard Service Offer program was continued through March 2009 with an update to the fixed rate adder to the NYMEX price.program. Starting in April 2009, East Ohio buys natural gas under the Standard Service Offer program only for customers not eligible to participate in the Energy Choice program and places

17


Energy Choice-eligible customers in a direct retail relationship with selected suppliers, which is designated on the customers’ bills.

In January 2013, the Ohio Commission granted East Ohio’s motion to fully exit the merchant function for its nonresidential customers, beginning in April 2013, which will require those customers to choose a retail supplier or be assigned to one at a monthly variable rate set by the supplier. At December 31, 2012, approximately 1.0 million of Dominion’s 1.2 million Ohio customers were participating in the Energy Choice program. Subject to the Ohio Commission’s approval, East Ohio may eventually exit the gas merchant function in Ohio entirely and have all customers select an alternate gas supplier. East Ohio continues to be the provider of last resort in the event of default by a supplier. Large industrial customers in Ohio also source their own natural gas supplies.

West Virginia—At this time, West Virginia has not enacted legislation to require customer choicecustomers to choose in the retail natural gas markets served by Hope. However, the West Virginia Commission has issued regulations to govern pooling services, one of the tools that natural gas suppliers may utilize to provide retail customercustomers a choice in the future and has issued rules requiring competitive gas service providers to be licensed in West Virginia.

Rates

Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries are subject to regulation of rates and other aspects of their businesses by the states in which

they operate—Ohio and West Virginia. When necessary, Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries seek general base rate increases to recover increased operating costs.costs and a fair return on rate base investments. Base rates are set based on the cost of service by rate class. A straight-fixed-variable rate design, in which the majority of operating costs are recovered through a monthly charge rather than a volumetric charge, is utilized to establish rates for a majority of East Ohio’s customers pursuant to a 2008 rate case settlement. Base rates for Hope are designed primarily based on rate design methodology in which the majority of operating costs are recovered through volumetric charges. In addition to general rate increases, Dominion’s gas distribution subsidiaries make routine separate filings with their respective state regulatory commissions to reflect changes in the costs of purchased gas. The majority of these purchased gas costs are subject to rate recovery

through a mechanism that ensures dollar for dollar recovery of prudently incurred costs. Costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates are deferred as regulatory assets. The purchased gas cost recovery filings generally cover prospective one-, three- or twelve-month periods. Approved increases or decreases in gas cost recovery rates result in increases or decreases in revenues with corresponding increases or decreases in net purchased gas cost expenses.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, the The Ohio Commission has also approved an approximately $41 million annual base rate revenue increase and an 8.49% allowed rate of return on rate base for East Ohio, which were reflected in revised base rates commencing December 22, 2008.

In October 2008, the Ohio Commission approvedseveral stand-alone cost recovery for an initial five-year period of East Ohio’s 25-year PIR programmechanisms to replace approximately 20% of its 21,000-mile pipeline system. In August 2009, East Ohio filed an application with the Ohio Commission seeking approval of the first annual adjustment to the PIR cost recovery charge approved as part of East Ohio’s 2008 base rate case. The application included a revenue requirement of approximately $16 million, which was subsequently reduced to approximately $13 million by an order issued by the Ohio Commission in December 2009. East Ohio opposed the order, however, its application for rehearing of the decision was denied. In March 2010, East Ohio filed a notice of appeal with the Supreme Court of Ohio alleging that the Ohio Commission’s order in the matter was unlawful, unjust and unreasonable. Dominion cannot predict the outcome of the appeal, however, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In August 2010, East Ohio filed its second annual application to adjust the cost recovery charge associated with its PIR program for actualrecover specified costs and a return on investments made through June 30, 2010. The application reflected a revenue requirement of approximately $28 million. In November 2010, the Ohio Commission approved a settlement agreement filed by East Ohiofor infrastructure projects and the Staff of the Ohio Commission reflecting a revenue requirement of approximately $27 million. Other interested partiescertain other costs that vary widely over time; such costs are excluded from general base rates. See Note 13 to the case neither supported nor objected to the settlement agreement.

Under the Ohio PIPP program, eligible customers can receive energy assistance based on their ability to pay their bill. The difference between the customer’s total bill and the PIPP plan payment amount is deferred and collected under the PIPP rider in accordance with the rules of the Ohio Commission. Due to increased participation in the program and increases in gas costs in the period since the previous rider rate went into effect, unrecovered costs increased. Accordingly, in March 2010, the Ohio Commission approved a 12-month recovery of approximately $259 million of uncollected receivables associated with the PIPP program, comprised of accumulated PIPP arrearages of $163 million and projected arrearages of $96 millionConsolidated Financial Statements for the 12 months that the PIPP rider rate will be in effect. The PIPPadditional information.

18


rider rate went into effect in April 2010. The Ohio Commission directed East Ohio to file an application, with arrearages calculated on a calendar year basis, to update its PIPP rider within one year of implementation of the new PIPP rider rate and annually thereafter.

In November 2010, rule changes adopted by the Ohio Commission to the PIPP program became effective. The rule changes established a new program, PIPP Plus, which replaced PIPP. The PIPP Plus program reduces the customer’s monthly payments from 10% to 6% of household income and provides for forgiveness credits to the customer’s balance when required payments are received in full by the due date. Such credits may result in the elimination of the customer’s arrearage balance over 24 months.

East Ohio files an annual UEX Rider with the Ohio Commission, pursuant to which it seeks recovery of the bad debt expense of most customers not participating in PIPP Plus. The UEX Rider is adjusted annually to achieve dollar-for-dollar recovery of East Ohio’s actual write-offs of uncollectable amounts. In 2010, East Ohio deferred approximately $55 million of bad debt expense for recovery through the UEX Rider.

In October 2008, Hope filed a request with the West Virginia Commission for an increase in the base rates it charges for natural gas service. The requested new base rates would have increased Hope’s revenues by approximately $34 million annually. In November 2009, the West Virginia Commission authorized an approximately $9 million increase in base rates. In June 2010, the West Virginia Commission authorized an additional base rate increase of less than $1 million to correct a miscalculation of rates attached to the November 2009 order.

Federal Regulations

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Electric

Under the Federal Power Act, FERC regulates wholesale sales and transmission of electricity in interstate commerce by public utilities. Virginia Power purchases and sells electricity in the PJM wholesale market and Dominion’s merchant generators sell electricity in the PJM, MISO and ISO-NE wholesale markets under Dominion’s market-based sales tariffs authorized by FERC. In addition, Virginia Power has FERC approval of a tariff to sell wholesale power at capped rates based on its embedded cost of generation. This cost-based sales tariff could be used to sell to loads within or outside Virginia Power’s service territory. Any such sales would be voluntary.

In May 2005, FERC issued an order finding that PJM’s existing transmission service rate design may not be just and reasonable, and ordered an investigation and hearings on the matter. In January 2008, FERC affirmed an earlier decision that the PJM transmission rate design for existing facilities had not become unjust and unreasonable. For recovery of costs of investments of new PJM-planned transmission facilities that operate at or above 500 kV, FERC established a regional rate design where all customers pay a uniform rate based on the costs of such investment. For recovery of costs of investment in new PJM-planned transmission facilities that operate below 500 kV, FERC affirmed its earlier decision to allocate costs on a beneficiary pays approach. A notice of appeal of this decision was filed in February 2008 at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In August

2009, the court denied the petition for review concerning the rate design for existing facilities, but granted the petition concerning the rate design for new facilities that operate at or above 500 kV, and remanded the issue of existing facilities back to FERC for further proceedings. Although Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of the FERC proceedings on remand, the impact of any PJM rate design changes on the Companies’ results of operations is not expected to be material.

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to FERC’s Standards of Conduct that govern conduct between transmission function employees of interstate gas and electricity transmission providers and the marketing function employees of their affiliates. The rule defines the scope of transmission and marketing-related functions that are covered by the standards and is designed to prevent transmission providers from giving their affiliates undue preferences.

Dominion and Virginia Power are also subject to FERC’s affiliate restrictions that (1) prohibit power sales between Virginia Power and Dominion’s merchant plants without first receiving FERC authorization, (2) require the merchant plants and Virginia Power to conduct their wholesale power sales operations separately, and (3) prohibit Virginia Power from sharing market information with merchant plant operating personnel. The rules are designed to prohibit Virginia Power from giving the merchant plants a competitive advantage.

In April 2008, FERC granted an application for Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations to establish a forward-looking formula rate mechanism that updates transmission rates on an annual basis and approved an ROE of 11.4%, effective as of January 1, 2008. The formula rate is designed to recover the expected revenue requirement for each calendar year and is updated based on actual costs. The FERC-approved formula method, which is based on projected costs, allows Virginia Power to earn a current return on its growing investment in electric transmission infrastructure.

In July 2008, Virginia Power filed an application with FERC requesting a revision to its revenue requirement to reflect an additional ROE incentive adder for eleven electric transmission enhancement projects. Under the proposal, the cost of transmission service would increase to include an ROE incentive adder for each of the eleven projects, beginning the date each project enters commercial operation (but not before January 1, 2009). Virginia Power proposed an incentive of 1.5% for four of the projects (including the Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun line and Carson-to-Suffolk line) and an incentive of 1.25% for the other seven projects. In August 2008, FERC approved the proposal, effective September 1, 2008. The total cost for all eleven projects is estimated at $877 million, and all projects are currently expected to be completed by 2012. Numerous parties sought rehearing of the FERC order in August 2008 and rehearing is pending. Although Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of the rehearing, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In March 2010, ODEC and NCEMC filed a complaint with FERC against Virginia Power claiming that approximately $223 million in transmission costs related to specific projects were unjust, unreasonable and unduly discriminatory or preferential and should be excluded from Virginia Power’s transmission formula rate. ODEC and NCEMC requested that FERC estab-

19


lish procedures to determine the amount of costs for each applicable project that should be excluded from Virginia Power’s rates. In October 2010, FERC issued an order dismissing the complaint in part and established hearings and settlement procedures on the remaining part of the complaint. While Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In May 2008, the RPM Buyers filed a complaint with FERC claiming that PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model’s transitional auctions have produced unjust and unreasonable capacity prices. The RPM Buyers requested that a refund effective date of June 1, 2008 be established and that FERC provide appropriate relief from unjust and unreasonable capacity charges within 15 months. In September 2008, FERC dismissed the complaint. The RPM Buyers requested rehearing of the FERC order in October 2008 and rehearing was denied in June 2009. A notice of appeal was filed in August 2009 by the Maryland Public Service Commission and the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In November 2009, the Court transferred the appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In February 2011, the Court of Appeals denied the petition for review, concluding that FERC had adequately explained why the rates were just and reasonable.

EPACT included provisions to create an ERO. The ERO is required to promulgate mandatory reliability standards governing the operation of the bulk power system in the U.S. FERC has certified NERC as the ERO and also issued an initial order approving many reliability standards that went into effect in 2007. Entities that violate standards will be subject to fines of between $1 thousand and $1 million per day, and can also be assessed non-monetary penalties, depending upon the nature and severity of the violation.

Dominion and Virginia Power plan and operate their facilities in compliance with approved NERC reliability requirements. Dominion and Virginia Power employees participate on various NERC committees, track the development and implementation of standards, and maintain proper compliance registration with NERC’s regional organizations. Dominion and Virginia Power anticipate incurring additional compliance expenditures over the next several years as a result of the implementation of new cyber securitycybersecurity programs as well as efforts to ensure appropriate facility ratings for Virginia Power’s transmission lines. In October 2010, NERC issued an industry alert identifying possible discrepancies between the design and actual field conditions of transmission facilities as a potential reliability issue. The alert recommends that entities review their current facilities rating methodology to verify that the methodology is based on actual field conditions, rather than solely on design documents, and to take corrective action if necessary. Virginia Power is evaluating its transmission facilities for any discrepancies between design and

18


actual field conditions. In addition, NERC has requested the industry to increase the number of assets subject to NERC reliability standards that are designated as critical assets, including cyber securitycybersecurity assets. While Dominion and Virginia Power expect to incur additional compliance costs in connection with the above NERC requirements and initiatives, such expenses are not expected to significantly affect results of operations.

In April 2008, FERC granted an application for Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations to establish a forward-looking formula rate mechanism that updates transmission rates on an annual basis and approved an ROE of 11.4%, effective as of January 1, 2008. The formula rate is designed to recover the expected revenue requirement for each calendar year and is updated based on actual costs. The FERC-approved formula method, which is based on projected costs, allows Virginia Power to earn a current return on its growing investment in electric transmission infrastructure.

Gas

FERC regulates the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, as amended. Under the Natural Gas Act, FERC has authority over rates, terms and conditions of services performed by Dominion’s interstate natural gas company subsidiaries, including DTI and Cove Point and the Dominion South Pipeline Company, LP.Point. FERC also has jurisdiction over siting, construction and operation of natural gas import facilities and interstate natural gas pipeline facilities.

Dominion’s interstate gas transmission and storage activities are generally conducted on an open access basis, in accordance with certificates, tariffs and service agreements on file with FERC.

Dominion is also subject to the Pipeline Safety ActActs of 2002 and 2011, which mandatesmandate inspections of interstate and intrastate natural gas transmission and storage pipelines, particularly those located in areas of high-density population. Dominion has evaluated its natural gas transmission and storage properties, as required by the Department of Transportation regulations under this Act,these Acts, and has implemented a program of identification, testing and potential remediation activities. These activities are ongoing.

In May 2005, FERC approved a comprehensive rate settlement with DTI, its customersSeeFuture Issues and interested state commissions. The settlement, which became effective July 1, 2005, revised DTI’s natural gas transmission ratesOther Matters in Item 7. MD&A and reduced fuel retention levels for storage service customers. As part of the settlement, DTI and all signatory parties agreed to a rate moratorium through June 30, 2010. DTI remains subjectNote 13 to the terms of the tariff rates established pursuant to the settlement.

In December 2007, DTI and the IOGA entered into a settlement agreement on DTI’s gathering and processing rates, which DTI and IOGA agreed in May 2010 to extend through December 31, 2014. DTI, at its option, may elect to extend the agreementConsolidated Financial Statements for an additional year through December 31, 2015. The settlement extension maintains the gas retainage fee structure that DTI has had since 2001. The rates are 10.5% for gathering and 0.5% for processing. Under the settlement, DTI continues to retain all revenues from its liquids sales, thus maintaining cash flow from the liquids business. DTI will file the negotiated rates associated with the agreement extension with FERC in December 2011.information.

Dominion is required to file a general base rate review for the FERC-jurisdictional services of Cove Point, effective no later than July 1, 2011. At that time, Cove Point’s cost of service will be reviewed by the FERC, with rates set based on analyses of Cove Point’s costs and capital structure.

Environmental Regulations

Each of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operating segments faces substantial laws, regulations and compliance costs with respect to environmental matters. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations authorize the imposition of substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. The cost of complying with applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules is expected to be material to the Companies. If expenditures for pollution control technologies and associated operating costs are not recoverable from customers through regulated rates (in regulated jurisdictions) or market prices (in deregulated jurisdictions), those costs could adversely affect future results of operations and cash flows. The cost of complying with appli-

20


cable environmental laws, regulations and rules is expected to be material to the Companies. Dominion and Virginia Power have applied for or obtained the necessary environmental permits for the operation of their facilities. Many of these permits are subject to reissuance and continuing review. For a discussion of significant aspects of these matters, including current and planned

capital expenditures relating to environmental compliance required to be discussed in this Item, seeEnvironmental MattersinFuture Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Additional information can also be found in Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 2322 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

General

In recent years there has been increasedThe national and international attention toin recent years on GHG emissions and their relationship to climate change which has resulted in federal, regional and state legislative or regulatory action in this area. Dominion and Virginia Power support national climate change legislation tothat would provide a consistent, economy-wide approach to addressing this issue and are currently taking action to protect the environment and address climate change while meeting the future needs of their growing service territory. Dominion’s CEO and operating segment CEOs are responsible for compliance with the laws and regulations governing environmental matters, including climate change, and Dominion’s Board of Directors receives periodic updates on these matters.

Dominion has developed a comprehensive GHG inventory for calendar year 2009. For Dominion Generation, Dominion’s SeeEnvironmental Strategyabove, Environmental Matters inFuture Issues and Virginia Power’s direct CO2 equivalent emissions, based on equity share (ownership), were approximately 54 million metric tonnesOther Mattersin Item 7. MD&A and 33 million metric tonnes, respectively, in 2009. For the DVP operating segment’s electric transmission and distribution operations, direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 0.2 million metric tonnes. DTI’s (including Cove Point) direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 2.5 million metric tonnes and East Ohio’s direct CO2 equivalent emissions were approximately 1.4 million metric tonnes. While the Companies do not have final 2010 emissions data, they do not expect a significant variance in emissions from 2009 amounts. With respect to electric generation, primary facility stack emissions of CO2 from carbon based fuel combustion are directly measured via continuous emissions monitor system methods set forth under 40 CFR Part 75 of the U.S. Electric Code of Federal Regulation. For those emission sources not covered under 40 CFR Part 75, and for methane and nitrous oxide emissions, quantification is based on fuel combustion, higher heating values, emission factors, and global warming potentials as specified in the EPA’s Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule. For the DVP operating segment’s electric transmission and distribution emissions, the protocol used wasThe Climate Registry. For Dominion’s natural gas businesses, combustion related emissions were calculated using the EPA Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule as described above. For DTI, the protocol used to calculate the non-combustion related emissions reported above wasGreenhouse Gas Emission Estimation Guidelines for NaturalGas Transmission and Storage, Volume 1-GHG EstimationMethodologies and Procedures-Revision 2, September 28, 2005 developed by the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America.

For East Ohio, the protocol used to calculate the non-combustion related emissions was the American Gas Association’s April 2008 Greenhouse Emissions Estimation Methodologies and Procedures for Natural Gas Distribution Operations.

Climate Change Legislation and Regulation

See Note 2322 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on climate change legislation and regulation.

Dominion and Virginia Power’s Strategy for Voluntarily Reducing GHG Emissionsregulation, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

While Dominion and Virginia Power have not established a standalone GHG emissions reduction target or timetable, they are actively engaged in voluntary reduction efforts and are working toward achieving the standards established by existing state regulations as set forth above. The Companies have an integrated strategy for reducing GHG emission intensity that is based on maintaining a diverse fuel mix, including nuclear, coal, gas, hydro and renewable energy, investing in renewable energy projects and promoting energy conservation and efficiency efforts. SeeEnvironmental Strategy above for a description of Dominion and Virginia Power’s strategy for reducing GHG emission intensity. Below are some of the Companies’ efforts that have or are expected to reduce the Companies’ carbon emissions or intensity:

Ÿ

In 2003, Virginia Power retired two oil-fired units at its Possum Point power station, replacing them with a new 559 MW combined-cycle natural gas unit. Virginia Power also converted two coal-fired units to cleaner burning natural gas.

Ÿ

Since 2000, Dominion has added over 2,600 MW of non-emitting nuclear generation and over 3,500 MW of new lower-emitting natural gas-fired generation including nearly 1,600 MW at Virginia Power (excluding Possum Point), to its generation mix.

Ÿ

Virginia Power added 83 MW of renewable biomass.

Ÿ

Dominion has over 800 MW of wind energy in operation or development.

Ÿ

In June 2010, Virginia Power announced its plans to develop an integrated solar and battery storage demonstration project in Halifax County, Virginia.

Ÿ

Virginia Power is completing construction of the 580 MW combined-cycle natural gas-fired Bear Garden generating facility.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has announced its plans to develop the Warren County power station development project, which is designed to be a 3-on-1, combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power station expected to generate more than 1,300 MW of electricity. In connection with the air permit process for the Warren County project, Virginia Power reached an agreement with the National Park Service to permanently retire the North Branch power station, a 74 MW coal fired plant located in West Virginia, once the Warren County power station begins commercial operations.

Ÿ

Virginia Power and ODEC have received an Early Site Permit from the NRC for the possible addition of approximately 1,500 MW of nuclear generation in Virginia. Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit.

Ÿ

In May 2010, Virginia Power launched five new DSM programs within the Virginia service territory and has sought the approval of the North Carolina commission to launch six new

21


DSM programs in North Carolina in 2011, subject to required regulatory approvals.

Ÿ

Virginia Power has initiated a demonstration of smart grid technologies, which are designed to help reduce the electric energy consumption of Virginia Power’s retail customers and therefore reduce generation requirements.

While, upon entering service, Virginia Power’s new Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center, which is currently under construction in southwest Virginia, will be a new source of GHG emissions, Virginia Power has taken steps to minimize the impact on the environment. The new plant is expected to use at least 10% biomass for fuel and is designed to be carbon-capture compatible, meaning that technology to capture CO2 can be added to the station when it becomes commercially available. Also, Virginia Power has announced plans to convert its coal units at Bremo power station to natural gas, contingent upon the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center entering service and receipt of necessary approvals. It is currently estimated that the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center will have the potential to emit about 4.8 million metric tonnes of direct CO2 emissions in a year assuming a 100% capacity factor and 100% coal-fired operation. Actual emissions will depend on the capacity factor of the facility and the extent to which biomass is burned. SeeDominion Generation—Properties for more information on the projects above, as well as other projects under current development.

Since 2000, the Companies have tracked the emissions of their electric generation fleet. Their electric generation fleet employs a mix of fuel and renewable energy sources. Comparing annual year 2000 to annual year 2009, Dominion and Virginia Power’s electric generating fleet (based on ownership percentage) reduced their average CO2 emissions rate per MWh of energy produced from electric generation by about 16% and 5%, respectively. During such time period the capacity of Dominion and Virginia Power’s electric generation fleet has grown.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

All aspects of the operation and maintenance of Dominion’s and Virginia Powers’ nuclear power stations which are part of the Dominion Generation segment, are regulated by the NRC. Operating licenses issued by the NRC are subject to revocation, suspension or modification, and the operation of a nuclear unit may be suspended if the NRC determines that the public interest, health or safety so requires.

From time to time, the NRC adopts new requirements for the operation and maintenance of nuclear facilities. In many cases, these new regulations require changes in the design, operation and maintenance of existing nuclear facilities. If the NRC adopts such requirements in the future, it could result in substantial increases in the cost of operating and maintaining Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear generating units. SeeNuclear Matters inFuture Issues and Other Matters in Item 7 MD&A for further information.

The NRC also requires Dominion and Virginia Power to decontaminate their nuclear facilities once operations cease. This process is referred to as decommissioning, and the Companies are required by the NRC to be financially prepared. For information on decommissioning trusts, seeDominion Generation—NuclearGeneration-Nuclear Decommissioning and Note 109 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on spent nuclear fuel.

SCPENT NUCLEAR FUELYBERSECURITY

Under provisionsIn an effort to reduce the likelihood and severity of cyber intrusions, the Nuclear Waste Policy ActCompanies have a comprehensive cybersecurity program designed to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of 1982,data and systems. In addition, Dominion and Virginia Power entered into contractsare subject to mandatory cybersecurity regulatory requirements, interface regularly with the DOE for the disposala wide range of spent nuclear fuel.external organizations, and participate in classified briefings to maintain an awareness of current cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities. The DOE failed to begin accepting the spent fuel on January 31, 1998, the date provided by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and by the Companies’ contracts with the DOE. In January 2004, Dominion and Virginia Power filed lawsuits in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims against the DOE requesting damages in connection with its failure to commence accepting spent nuclear fuel. A trial occurred in May 2008 and post-trial briefing and argument concluded in July 2008. On October 15, 2008, the Court issued an opinion and order for Dominion in the amount of approximately $155 million, which includes approximately $112 million in damages incurred by Virginia Power for spent fuel-related costs at its Surry and North Anna power stations and approximately $43 million in damages incurred for spent nuclear fuel-related costs at Millstone through June 30, 2006. Judgment was entered by the Court on October 28, 2008. In December 2008, the government appealed the judgment to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the appeal was docketed. In March 2009, the Federal Circuit granted the government’s request to stay the appeal. In May 2010, the stay was lifted, and the government’s initial brief in the appeal was filed in June 2010. The issues raised by the government on appeal pertain to the damages awarded to Dominion for Millstone. The government did not take issue with the damages awarded to Virginia Power for Surry or North Anna. As a result, Virginia Power recognized a receivable in the amount of $174 million, largely offset against property, plant and equipmentcurrent security posture and regulatory assetscompliance efforts are intended to address the evolving and liabilities, representing certain spent nuclear fuel-related costs incurred through June 30, 2010. Briefing on the appeal was concluded in September 2010 and oral argument took place before the Federal Circuit in January 2011. Payment of any damages will not occur until the appeal process has been resolved.changing cyber threats.

19

A lawsuit was also filed for Kewaunee. In August 2010, Dominion and the federal government reached a settlement resolving Dominion’s claims for damages incurred at Kewaunee through December 31, 2008. The approximately $21 million settlement payment was received in September 2010.


The Companies will continue to manage their spent fuel until it is accepted by the DOE.

Virginia Power and Kewaunee continue to recognize receivables for certain spent nuclear fuel-related costs that they believe are probable of recovery from the DOE.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and are often beyond their control. A number of these factors have been identified below. For other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement or projection contained in this report, see Forward-Looking Statements in Item 7. MD&A.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s results of operations can be affected by changes in the weather. Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and natural gas, and affect

22


the price of energy commodities. In addition, severe weather, including hurricanes and winter storms, can be destructive, causing outages and property damage that require incurring additional expenses. Additionally, droughtsChanges in weather conditions can result in reduced water levels or changes in water temperatures that could adversely affect operations at some of the Companies’ power stations. Furthermore, the Companies’ operations could be adversely affected and their physical plant placed at greater risk of damage should changes in global climate produce, among other possible conditions, unusual variations in temperature and weather patterns, resulting in more intense, frequent and extreme weather events, abnormal levels of precipitation and, for operations located on or near coastlines, a change in sea level.level or sea temperatures.

The rates of Dominion’s gas transmission and distribution operations and Virginia Power’s electric transmission, distribution and generation operations are subject to regulatory review.Revenue provided by Virginia Power’s electric transmission, distribution and generation operations and Dominion’s gas transmission and distribution operations is based primarily on rates approved by state and federal regulatory agencies. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on their ability, through the rates that they are permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable rate of return on their capital investment.

Virginia Power’s wholesale rates for electric transmission service are adjusted on an annual basis through operation of a FERC-approved formula rate mechanism. Through this mechanism, Virginia Power’s wholesale electric transmission cost of service is estimated and thereafter adjusted to reflect Virginia Power’s actual electric transmission costs incurred. These wholesale rates are subject to FERC review and prospective adjustment in the event that customers and/or interested state commissions file a complaint with FERC and are able to demonstrate that Virginia Power’s wholesale revenue requirement is no longer just and reasonable.

Similarly, various rates and charges assessed by Dominion’s gas transmission businesses are subject to review by FERC. In addition, the rates of Dominion’s gas distribution businesses are subject to state regulatory review in the jurisdictions in which they operate.

Virginia Power’s base rates, terms and conditions for generation and distribution services to customers in Virginia are reviewed by the Virginia Commission on a biennial basis in a proceeding that involves the determination of Virginia Power’s actual earned ROE during a combined two-year historic test period, and the determination of Virginia Power’s authorized ROE prospectively. Under certain circumstances described in the Regulation Act, Virginia Power may be required to share a portion of its earnings with customers through a refund process, and the Virginia Commission may order a base rate increase or reduction during the biennial review. Additionally, Virginia

Power was required to discontinue deferral accounting for certain existing rate adjustment clauses as of December 1, 2011. As a result, Virginia Power may potentially not fully recover costs associated with these existing rate adjustment clauses.

Virginia Power’s retail electric base rates for bundled generation, transmission, and distribution services to customers in North Carolina are regulated on a cost-of-service/rate-of-return basis subject to North Carolina statutes, and the rules and procedures of the North Carolina Commission. If retail electric earnings exceed the returns established by the North Carolina Commission, retail electric rates may be subject to review and possible reduction by the North Carolina Commission, which may decrease Virginia Power’s future earnings. Additionally, if the North Carolina Commission does not allow recovery through base rates, on a timely basis, of costs incurred in providing service, Virginia Power’s future earnings could be negatively impacted.

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to complex governmental regulation that could adversely affect their results of operations.operations and subject the Companies to monetary penalties.Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation and require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from various governmental agencies. These operations are also subject to legislation governing taxation at the federal, state and local level. They must also comply with environmental legislation and associated regulations. Management believes that the necessary approvals have been obtained for existing operations and that theirthe business is conducted in accordance with applicable laws. However, newThe Companies’ businesses are subject to regulatory regimes which could result in substantial monetary penalties if either Dominion or Virginia Power is found not to be in compliance, including mandatory reliability standards and interaction in the wholesale markets. New laws or regulations, the revision or reinterpretation of existing laws or regulations, or penalties imposed for non-compliance with existing laws or regulations may result in substantial expense.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s generation business may be negatively affected by possible FERC actions that could change market design in the wholesale markets or affect pricing rules or revenue calculations in the RTO markets. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s generation stations operating in RTO markets sell capacity, energy and ancillary services into wholesale electricity markets regulated by FERC. The wholesale markets allow these generation stations to take advantage of market price opportunities, but also expose them to market risk. Properly functioning competitive wholesale markets depend upon FERC’s continuation of clearly identified market rules. From time to time FERC may investigate and authorize RTOs to make changes in market design. FERC also periodically reviews Dominion’s authority to sell at market-based rates. Material changes by FERC to the design of the wholesale markets, Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s authority to sell power at market-based rates, or changes to pricing rules or rules involving revenue calculations, could adversely impact the future results of Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s generation business.

Dominion and Virginia Power couldinfrastructure build plans often require regulatory approval before construction can commence. Dominion and Virginia Power may not complete plant construction or expansion projects that they commence, or they may complete projects on materially different terms or timing than initially anticipated, and they may not be subjectable to penaltiesachieve the intended benefits of any such project, if completed.Several plant construction and expansion projects have been announced and additional projects may be considered in the

20


future. Commencing construction on announced plants requires approvals from applicable state and federal agencies. Projects may not be able to be completed on time as a result of mandatory reliability standards. Asweather conditions, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain regulatory approvals, delays in obtaining key materials, labor difficulties, difficulties with partners or potential partners, a resultdecline in the credit strength of EPACT, ownerstheir counterparties or vendors, or other factors beyond their control. Even if plant construction and operatorsexpansion projects are completed, the total costs of generation facilitiesthe projects may be higher than anticipated and bulk electric transmission systems, includingthe performance of the business of Dominion and Virginia Power are subjectfollowing the projects may not meet expectations. Additionally, Dominion and Virginia Power may not be able to mandatory reliability standards enacted by NERCtimely and enforced by FERC. Compliance witheffectively integrate the mandatory reliability standards may subject the Companies to higher operating costsprojects into their operations and such integration may result in increased capital expenditures. If either Dominionunforeseen operating difficulties or Virginia Power is foundunanticipated costs. Further, regulators may disallow recovery of some of the costs of a project if they are deemed not to be in compliance withprudently incurred. Any of these or other factors could adversely affect the mandatory reliability standards it could be subjectCompanies’ ability to remediation costs, as well as sanctions, including substantial monetary penalties.realize the anticipated benefits from the plant construction and expansion projects.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s current costs of compliance with environmental laws are significant. The costs of compliance with futureenvironmental laws, including laws and regulations designed to addressglobal climate change, air quality, coal combustion by-products, cooling water and other matters could make certain of the Companies’ generation facilities uneconomical to maintain or operate.Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations relating to air quality, water quality, waste management, natural resources, and health and safety. Compliance with these legal requirements requires the Companies to commit significant capital toward permitting, emission fees, environmental monitoring, installation and operation of pollution control equipment and purchase of allowances and/or offsets. Additionally, the Companies could be responsible for expenses relating to remediation and containment obligations, including at sites where they have been identified by a regulatory agency as a potentially responsible party. Expenditures relating to environmental compliance have been significant in the past, and Dominion and Virginia Power expect that they will remain significant in the future.

Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and/or new laws may be adopted or become applicable to Domin-

ionDominion or Virginia Power. The EPA is expected to issue additional regulations with respect to air quality under the CAA, including revised NAAQS a replacementand regulations governing the emissions of the CAIR relating to NOX and SO2emissions, and a MACT rule for coal and oil-firedGHGs from electric generation plants that will likely address numerous HAPs, including mercury.generating units. Risks relating to potential regulation of GHG emissions are discussed below. Dominion and Virginia Power also expect additional federal water and waste regulations, including regulations concerning cooling water intake structures and coal combustion by-product handling and disposal practices.practices that are expected to be applicable to at least some of its generating facilities.

Compliance costs cannot be estimated with certainty due to the inability to predict the requirements and timing of implementation of any new environmental rules or regulations related to emissions.regulations. Other factors which affect the ability to predict future environmental expenditures with certainty include the difficulty in estimating clean-up costs and quantifying liabilities under environmental laws that impose joint and several liability on all responsible parties. However, such expenditures, if excessive,material, could make the Companies’ generation facilities uneconomical to operate, result in the impairment of assets, or otherwise adversely affect Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s results of operations, financial performance or liquidity.

If additional federal and/or state requirements are imposed on energy companies mandating limitations on GHG emissions or requiring efficiency improvements, suchrequirements may result in compliancecosts that alone or in combinationcombination could make some of Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s electric generationgeneration units or natural gas facilities uneconomical to maintain or operate.The U.S. Congress,EPA, environmental advocacy groups, other organizations and some state and other federal agencies are focusing considerable attention on GHG emissions from power generation facilities and their potential role in climate change. Dominion and Virginia Power expect that federal legislation and/or additional EPA regulation,regulations, and possibly additional state legislation and/or regulation,regulations, may passbe issued resulting in the imposition of additional limitations on GHG emissions or requiring efficiency improvements from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.

There are also potential impacts on Dominion’s natural gas businesses as federal or state GHG legislation andor regulations may require GHG emission reductions from the natural gas sector and could affect demand for natural gas. Additionally, GHG requirements could result in increased demand for energy conservation and renewable products. Several regions of the U.S. have moved forward with GHG emission regulations including regions where Dominion has operations. For example, Massachusetts hasand Rhode Island have implemented regulations requiring reductions in CO2 emissions through RGGI, a cap and trade program covering CO2 emissions from power plants in the Northeast, which affects several of Dominion’s facilities.

Compliance with GHG emission reduction requirements may require increasing the energy efficiency of equipment at facilities, committing significant capital toward carbon capture and storage technology, purchase of allowances and/or offsets, fuel switching, and/or retirement of high-emitting generation facilities and potential replacement with lower emitting generation facilities. The cost of compliance with GHG emission legislation and/or regulation is subject to significant uncertainties due to the outcome of several interrelated assumptions and variables, including timing of the implementation of rules, required levels of reductions, allocation requirements of the new rules, the maturation and commercialization of carbon capture and storage technology,

23


and associated regulations, and the selected compliance alternatives. As a result, theThe Companies cannot estimate the aggregate effect of any such legislationrequirements on their results of operations, financial condition or their customers. However, such expenditures, if excessive,material, could make the Companies’ generation facilities uneconomical to operate, result in the impairment of assets, or otherwise adversely affect Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s results of operations, financial performance or liquidity.

The base rates and rider rates of Virginia Power are subject to regulatory review. As a result of the Regulation Act, in 2009 the Virginia Commission commenced its review of the base rates of Virginia Power under a modified cost-of-service model. That review culminated in a final order in March 2010, in which the Commission ordered that Virginia Power’s base rates be frozen at their pre-September 1, 2009 levels until December 1, 2013. In 2011, however, the Virginia Commission will commence biennial reviews of the rates and terms and conditions of Virginia Power and, in that first biennial review, may order a credit to customers for a portion of earnings more than 50 basis points above the authorized ROE.

The rates of Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations and Dominion’s gas transmission and distribution operations are subject to regulatory review. Revenue provided by Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations and Dominion’s gas transmission and distribution operations is based primarily on rates approved by federal and state regulatory agencies. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on their ability, through the rates that they are permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable rate of return on their capital investment.

Virginia Power’s wholesale charges for electric transmission service are adjusted on an annual basis through operation of a FERC-approved formula rate mechanism. Through this mechanism, Virginia Power’s wholesale electric transmission cost of service is estimated and thereafter adjusted as appropriate to reflect actual costs allocated to Virginia Power by PJM. These wholesale rates are subject to FERC review and prospective adjustment in the event that customers and/or interested state commissions file a complaint with FERC and are able to demonstrate that Virginia Power’s wholesale revenue requirement is no longer just and reasonable.

Similarly, various rates and charges assessed by Dominion’s gas transmission businesses are subject to review by FERC. Dominion is required to file a general base rate review for the FERC-jurisdictional services of Cove Point, effective no later than July 31, 2011. At that time, Cove Point’s cost-of-service will be reviewed by the FERC, with rates set based on analyses of Cove Point’s costs and capital structure.

Dominion’s gas distribution businesses are subject to state regulatory review in the jurisdictions in which they operate.

Risks arising from the reliability of electric generation, transmission and distribution equipmentthe Companies’ facilities supply chain disruptions or personnel issues could result in lost revenues andincreased expenses, including higher maintenance costs.Operation of the Companies’ generation, transmission and distribution facilities involves risk, including the risk of potential breakdown or failure of equipment or processes due to aging infrastructure, fuel supply or transportation disruptions, accidents, labor disputes or work stoppages by employees, acts of terrorism or sabotage, construction delays or cost overruns, shortages of or delays in obtaining equipment, material and labor, operational restrictions

resulting from environmental limitations and governmental interventions, and performance below expected levels. In addition, weather-related incidents, earthquakes and other natural disasters can disrupt generation, transmission and distributionoperation of the Companies’ facilities. Because Virginia Power’s transmission facilities are interconnected with those of third parties, the operation of its facilities could be adversely affected by unexpected or uncontrollable events occurring on the systems of such third parties.

21


Operation of the Companies’ generation facilities below expected capacity levels could result in lost revenues and increased expenses, including higher maintenance costs. Unplanned outages of generating unitsthe Companies’ facilities and extensions of scheduled outages due to mechanical failures or other problems occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of the Companies’ business. Unplanned outages typically increase the Companies’ operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce their revenues as a result of selling less energyoutput or may require the Companies to incur significant costs as a result of operating higher cost units or obtaining replacement energy and capacityoutput from third parties in the open market to satisfy forward energy and capacity or other contractual obligations. Moreover, if the Companies are unable to perform their contractual obligations, penalties or liability for damages could result.

Dominion and Virginia Power have substantial ownership interests in and operate nuclear generating units; as a result, each may incursubstantial costs and liabilities.Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear facilities are subject to operational, environmental, health and financial risks such as the on-site storage of spent nuclear fuel, the ability to dispose of such spent nuclear fuel, the ability to maintain adequate reserves for decommissioning, limitations on the amounts and types of insurance available, potential operational liabilities and extended outages, the costs of replacement power, the costs of maintenance and the costs of securing the facilities against possible terrorist attacks. Dominion and Virginia Power maintain decommissioning trusts and external insurance coverage to minimize the financial exposure to these risks; however, it is possible that future decommissioning costs could exceed amounts in the decommissioning trusts and/or damages could exceed the amount of insurance coverage. If Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s decommissioning trust funds are insufficient, and they are not allowed to recover the additional costs incurred through insurance, or in the case of Virginia Power through regulatory mechanisms, their results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear facilities are also subject to complex government regulation which could negatively impact their results of operations. The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generating facilities. In the event of noncompliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines, set license conditions, shut down a nuclear unit, or take some combination of these actions, depending on its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. Revised safety requirements promulgated by the NRC could require Dominion and Virginia Power to make substantial expenditures at their nuclear plants. In addition, although the Companies have no reason to anticipate a serious nuclear incident at their plants, if an incident did occur, it could materially and adversely affect their results of operations and/or financial condition. A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world, such as the nuclear events in Japan in 2011, could cause the NRC to adopt increased safety regulations or otherwise limit or restrict the operation or licensing of domestic nuclear units.

Dominion depends on third parties to produce the natural gas it gathers and processes, and the NGLs it fractionates at its facilities. A reduction in these quantities could reduce Dominion’s revenues. Dominion obtains its supply of natural gas and NGLs from numerous third-party producers. Such producers are under no obligation to deliver a specific quantity of natural gas or NGLs to Dominion’s facilities, although the producers that have con-

tracted to supply natural gas to Dominion’s natural gas processing and fractionation facility under development in Natrium, West Virginia will generally be subject to contractual minimum fee payments. If producers were to decrease the supply of natural gas or NGLs to Dominion’s systems and facilities for any reason, Dominion could experience lower revenues to the extent it is unable to replace the lost volumes on similar terms.

Dominion’s merchant power business is operating in a challenging market, which could adversely affect its results of operations and future growth.

The success of Dominion’s merchant power business depends upon favorable market conditions including the ability to purchase and sell power at prices sufficient to cover its operating costs. Dominion operates in active wholesale markets that expose it to price volatility for electricity and fuel as well as the credit risk of counterparties. Dominion attempts to manage its price risk by entering into hedging transactions, including short-term and long-term fixed price sales and purchase contracts.

In these wholesale markets, the spot market price of electricity for each hour is generally determined by the cost of supplying the next unit of electricity to the market during that hour. In many cases, the next unit of electricity supplied would be provided by generating stations that consume fossil fuels, primarily natural gas. Consequently, the open market wholesale price for electricity generally reflects the cost of natural gas plus the cost to convert the fuel to electricity. Therefore, changes in the price of natural gas generally affect the open market wholesale price of electricity. To the extent Dominion does not enter into long-term power purchase agreements or otherwise effectively hedge its output, then these changes in market prices could adversely affect its financial results.

Dominion purchases fuel under a variety of terms, including long-term and short-term contracts and spot market purchases. Dominion is exposed to fuel cost volatility for the portion of its fuel obtained through short-term contracts or on the spot market.market, including as a result of market supply shortages. Fuel prices can be volatile and the price that can be obtained for power produced from such fuel may not change at the same rate as fuel costs, thus adversely impacting Dominion’s financial results.

Energy conservation could negatively impact Dominion’s merchant powerand Virginia Power’s financial results. Certain regulatory and legislative bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by a fixed date. Additionally, technological advances driven by federal laws mandating new levels of energy efficiency in end-use electric devices, including lighting and electric heat pumps, could lead to declines in per capita energy consumption. To the extent conservation results in reduced energy demand or significantly slowed growth in demand, the value of the Companies’ business activities could be adversely impacted.

Exposure to counterparty performance may be negatively affectedadversely affect the Companies’ financial results of operations. Dominion and Virginia Power are exposed to credit risks of their counterparties and the risk that one or more counterparties may fail or delay the performance of their contractual obligations, including but not limited to payment for services. Counterparties could fail or delay the performance of their contractual obligations for a number of reasons, including the effect of regulations on their operations. Such defaults by possible FERC actions that could weaken competition incustomers, suppliers or other third parties may adversely affect the wholesale markets or affect pricing rules in the RTO markets.Dominion’s merchant generation stations operating in PJM, MISO and ISO-NE sell capacity, energy and ancillary services into wholesale elec-Companies’ financial results.

 

 

2422    

 


 

 

tricityMarket performance and other changes may decrease the value of decommissioning trust funds and benefit plan assets or increase Dominion’s liabilities, which could then require significant additional funding. The performance of the capital markets regulated by FERC. The wholesale markets allowaffects the value of the assets that are held in trusts to satisfy future obligations to decommission Dominion’s nuclear plants and under its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Dominion has significant obligations in these merchant generation stations to take advantage of market price opportunities, but also expose themareas and holds significant assets in these trusts. These assets are subject to market risk. Properly functioning competitive wholesale marketsfluctuation and will yield uncertain returns, which may fall below expected return rates.

With respect to decommissioning trust funds, a decline in PJM, MISOthe market value of these assets may increase the funding requirements of the obligations to decommission Dominion’s nuclear plants or require additional NRC-approved funding assurance.

A decline in the market value of the assets held in trusts to satisfy future obligations under Dominion’s pension and ISO-NE depend upon FERC’s continuation of clearly identified market rules. From time to time FERCother postretirement benefit plans may investigate and authorize PJM, MISO and ISO-NE to makeincrease the funding requirements under such plans. Additionally, changes in market design. FERCinterest rates affect the liabilities under Dominion’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans; as interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, potentially requiring additional funding. Further, changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirements or changes in life expectancy assumptions, may also periodically reviews Dominion’s authority to sell at market-based rates. Material changes by FERCincrease the funding requirements of the obligations related to the design of the wholesale markets or Dominion’s authority to sell power at market-based rates could adversely impact the future results of its merchant power business.

War, acts and threats of terrorism, natural disasterpension and other significant events could adversely affect Dominion’spostretirement benefit plans.

If the decommissioning trust funds and Virginia Power’soperations.We cannot predict the impact that any future terrorist attacks may have on the energy industry in general, or on our business in particular. Any retaliatory military strikes or sustained military campaign may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, such as changes in insurance markets and disruptions of fuel supplies and markets. In addition, infrastructure facilities, such as electric generation, electric and gas transmission and distribution facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror. Furthermore, the physical or cyber security compromise of our facilities, could adversely affect our ability to manage these facilities effectively. Instability in financial markets as a result of terrorism, war, natural disasters, pandemic, credit crises, recessionbenefit plan assets are negatively impacted by market fluctuations or other factors, could result in a significant decline in the U.S. economy, and the increased cost of insurance coverage, any of which could negatively impact the Companies’Dominion’s results of operations, and financial condition.condition and/or cash flows could be negatively affected.

There are risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities. Dominion and Virginia Power operate nuclear facilities that are subject to risks, including their ability to dispose of spent nuclear fuel, the disposal of which is subject to complex federal and state regulatory constraints. These risks also include the cost of and ability to maintain adequate reserves for decommissioning, costs of replacement power, costs of plant maintenance and exposure to potential liabilities arising out of the operation of these facilities. Decommissioning trusts and external insurance coverage are maintained to mitigate the financial exposure to these risks. However, it is possible that decommissioning costs could exceed the amount in the trusts or that costs arising from claims could exceed the amount of any insurance coverage.

The use of derivative instruments could result in financial losses and liquidity constraints.Dominion and Virginia Power use derivative instruments, including futures, swaps, forwards, options and FTRs, to manage commodity and financial market risks. In addition, Dominion purchases and sells commodity-based contracts primarily in the natural gas market for trading purposes. The Companies could recognize financial losses on these contracts, including as a result of volatility in the market values of the underlying commodities, or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract.contract or upon the failure or insolvency of a financial intermediary, exchange or clearinghouse used to enter, execute or clear these transactions. In the absence of actively-quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these contracts involves management’s judgment or use of estimates. As a result, changes in the underlyingunder-lying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.

The use of derivatives to hedge future sales may limit the benefit Dominion would otherwise receive from increases in commodity prices. These hedge arrangements generally include collateral requirements that require Dominion to deposit funds or post letters of credit with counterparties, financial intermediaries or clearinghouses to cover the fair value of covered contracts in excess of agreed upon credit limits. For instance, when commodity prices rise to levels substantially higher than the levels where it has hedged future sales, Dominion may be required to use a material portion of its available liquidity or obtain additional liquidity to cover these collateral requirements. In some circumstances, this could have a compounding effect on Dominion’s financial liquidity and results of operations. In addition, the availability or security of the collateral delivered by Dominion

may be adversely affected by the failure or insolvency of a financial intermediary, exchange or clearinghouse used to enter, execute or clear these types of transactions.

Derivatives designated under hedge accounting, to the extent not fully offset by the hedged transaction, can result in ineffectiveness losses. These losses primarily result from differences between the location and/or specifications of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged item and could adversely affect Dominion’s results of operations.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations in regards to these transactions are subject to multiple market risks including market liquidity, counterpartyprice volatility, credit strength of the Companies’ counterparties and price volatility.the financial condition of the financial intermediaries, exchanges and clearinghouses used for the types of transactions. These market risks are beyond the Companies’ control and could adversely affect their results of operations, liquidity and future growth.

The Dodd-Frank Act which was enacted into law in July 2010 in an effort to improve regulation of financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions that will require certain over-the-counter derivatives, or swaps, to be centrally cleared and executed through an exchange or other approved trading platform. Non-financial entities that use swaps to hedge or mitigate commercial risk, often referred to as end users, can choose to exempt their hedging transactions from these clearing and exchange trading requirements. Final rules for the over-the-counter derivatives-relatedderivative-related provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act including the clearing, exchange trading and capital and margin requirements, will continue to be established through the CFTC’songoing rulemaking process which is required to be completed by July 2011.of the applicable regulators. If, as a result of the rulemaking process, Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s derivative activities are not exempted from the clearing, exchange trading or margin requirements, the Companies could be subject to higher costs, for their derivative activities, including from higher margin requirements.requirements, for their derivative activities. In addition, implementation of, and compliance with, the over-the-counter derivativesderivative provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act by the Companies’ swap counterparties could result in increased costs related to the Companies’ derivative activities.

Dominion and Virginia Power may not complete plant construction or expansion projects that they commence, or they may complete projects on materially different terms or timing than initially anticipated and they may not be able to achieve the intended benefits of any such project, if completed. Several plant construction and expansion projects have been announced and additional projects may be considered in the future. Management anticipates that they will be required to seek additional financing in the future to fund current and future plant construction and expansion projects and may not be able to secure such financing on favorable terms. In addition, projects may not be able to be completed on time as a result of weather conditions, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain regulatory approvals, delays in obtaining key materials, labor difficulties, difficulties with partners or potential partners, a decline in the credit strength of their counterparties or vendors, or other factors beyond their control. Even if plant construction and expansion projects are completed, the total costs of the projects may be higher than anticipated and the performance of the business of Dominion and Virginia Power following the projects may

25


not meet expectations. Additionally, regulators may disallow recovery of some of the costs of a project if they are deemed not to be prudently incurred. Further, Dominion and Virginia Power may not be able to timely and effectively integrate the projects into their operations and such integration may result in unforeseen operating difficulties or unanticipated costs. Any of these or other factors could adversely affect their ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the plant construction and expansion projects.

Exposure to counterparty performance may adversely affect the Companies’ financial results of operations.Dominion and Virginia Power are exposed to credit risks of their counterparties and the risk that one or more counterparties may fail or delay the performance of their contractual obligations, including but not limited to payment for services. Such defaults by customers, suppliers or other third parties may adversely affect the Companies’ financial results.

Energy conservation could negatively impact Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s financial results. Certain regulatory and legislative bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by a fixed date. Additionally, technological advances driven by federal laws mandating new levels of energy efficiency in end-use electric devices, including lighting and electric heat pumps, could lead to declines in per capita energy consumption. To the extent conservation resulted in reduced energy demand or significantly slowed the growth in demand, the value of the Companies’ business activities could be adversely impacted.

An inability to access financial markets could adversely affect the execution of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business plans.Dominion and Virginia Power rely on access to short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as significant sources of funding and liquidity for capital expenditures, normal working capital and collateral requirements related to hedges of future sales and purchases of energy-related commodities. Deterioration in the Companies’ creditworthiness, as evaluated by credit rating agencies or otherwise, or market reputation, or general financial market disruptions outside of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s control could increase their cost of borrowing or restrict their ability to access one or more financial markets. Further market disruptions could stem from delays in the current economic recovery, the bankruptcy of an unrelated company, general market disruption due to general credit market or political events, or the failure of financial institutions on which the Companies rely. Increased costs and restrictions on the Companies’ ability to access financial markets may be severe enough to affect their ability to execute their business plans as scheduled.

Market performance and other changes may decrease the value of decommissioning trust funds and benefit plan assets or increase Dominion’s liabilities, which then could require significant additional funding. The performance of the capital markets affects the value of the assets that are held in trusts to satisfy future obligations to decommission Dominion’s nuclear plants and under its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Dominion has significant obligations in these areas and holds significant assets in these trusts. These assets are subject to market fluctuation and will yield uncertain returns, which may fall below expected return rates. A decline in the market value of the assets may increase the funding requirements of the obligations to decommission Dominion’s

nuclear plants and under its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Additionally, changes in interest rates affect the liabilities under Dominion’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans; as interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, potentially requiring additional funding. Further, changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirements or changes in life expectancy assumptions, may also increase the funding requirements of the obligations related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans. If the decommissioning trust funds and benefit plan assets are negatively impacted by market fluctuations, Dominion’s results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected.

Changing rating agency requirements could negatively affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s growth and business strategy.In order to maintain appropriate credit ratings to obtain needed credit at a reasonable cost in light of existing or future rating agency requirements, Dominion and Virginia Power may find it necessary to take steps or change their business plans in ways that may adversely affect their growth and earnings. A reduction in Dominion’s credit ratings or the credit ratings of Virginia Power could result in an increase in borrowing costs, loss of access to certain markets, or both, thus adversely affecting operating results and could require Dominion to post additional collateral in connection with some of its price risk management activities.

An inability to access financial markets could adversely affect the execution of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business plans.Dominion and Virginia Power rely on access to short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as significant sources of funding and liquidity for capital expenditures, normal working capital and collateral requirements related to hedges of future sales and purchases of energy-related commodities. Deterioration in the Companies’ creditworthiness, as evaluated by credit rating agencies or otherwise, or declines in market reputation either for the Companies or their industry in general, or general financial market disruptions outside of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s control could increase their cost of borrowing or restrict their

23


ability to access one or more financial markets. Further market disruptions could stem from delays in the current economic recovery, the bankruptcy of an unrelated company, general market disruption due to general credit market or political events, or the failure of financial institutions on which the Companies rely. Increased costs and restrictions on the Companies’ ability to access financial markets may be severe enough to affect their ability to execute their business plans as scheduled.

Potential changes in accounting practices may adversely affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s financial results.Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the impact that future changes in accounting standards or practices may have on public companies in general, the energy industry or their operations specifically. New accounting standards could be issued that could change the way they record revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. These changes in accounting standards could adversely affect reported earnings or could increase reported liabilities.

War, acts and threats of terrorism, natural disaster and other significant events could adversely affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations. Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the impact that any future terrorist attacks may have on the energy industry in general, or on the Companies’ business in particular. Any retaliatory military strikes or sustained military campaign may affect the Companies’ operations in unpredictable ways, such as changes in insurance markets and disruptions of fuel supplies and markets. In addition, the Companies’ infrastructure facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror. Furthermore, the physical compromise of the Companies’ facilities could adversely affect the Companies’ ability to manage these facilities effectively. Instability in financial markets as a result of terrorism, war, natural disasters, pandemic, credit crises, recession or other factors could result in a significant decline in the U.S. economy and increase the cost of insurance coverage. This could negatively impact the Companies’ results of operations and financial condition.

Hostile cyber intrusions could severely impair Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations, lead to the disclosure of confidential information, damage the reputation of the Companies and otherwise have an adverse effect on Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business. The Companies own assets deemed as critical infrastructure, the operation of which is dependent on information technology systems. Further, the computer systems that run the Companies’ facilities are not completely isolated from external networks. Parties that wish to disrupt the U.S. bulk power system or the Companies’ operations could view the Companies’ computer systems, software or networks as attractive targets for cyber attack. In addition, the Companies’ businesses require that they collect and maintain sensitive customer data, as well as confidential employee and shareholder information, which is subject to electronic theft or loss.

A successful cyber attack on the systems that control the Companies’ electric generation, electric or gas transmission or distribution assets could severely disrupt business operations, preventing the Companies from serving customers or collecting revenues. The breach of certain business systems could affect the Companies’ ability to correctly record, process and report financial information. A major cyber incident could result in significant expenses to investigate and repair security breaches or system damage and could lead to litigation, fines, other remedial action, heightened regulatory scrutiny and damage to the Companies’ reputation. In addition, the misappropriation, corruption or loss of personally identifiable information and other

confidential data could lead to significant breach notification expenses and mitigation expenses such as credit monitoring. The Companies maintain property and casualty insurance that may cover certain damage caused by potential cybersecurity incidents, however, other damage and claims arising from such incidents may not be covered or may exceed the amount of any insurance available. For these reasons, a significant cyber incident could materially and adversely affect the Companies’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to retain and attract key executive officers and other skilled professional and technical employees could have an adverse effect on Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operations.Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s business strategy is dependent on their ability to recruit, retain and motivate employees. Competition for skilled employees in some areas is high and the inability to retain and attract these employees could adversely affect their business and future operating results. An aging workforce in the energy industry necessitates recruiting, retaining and developing the next generation of leadership.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion owned its principal executive office and three other corporate offices, all located in Richmond, Virginia. Dominion also leases corporate offices in other cities in which its subsidiaries operate. Virginia Power shares its principal office in Richmond, Virginia, which is owned by Dominion. In addition, Virginia Power’s DVP and Generation segments share certain leased buildings and equipment. See Item 1. Business for additional information about each segment’s principal properties, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Dominion’s assets consist primarily of its investments in its subsidiaries, the principal properties of which are described here and in Item 1. Business.

26


Substantially all of Virginia Power’s property is subject to the lien of the Indenture of Mortgage securing its First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds. There were no bonds outstanding as of December 31, 2010;2012; however, by leaving the indenture open,

Virginia Power retains the flexibility to issue mortgage bonds in the future. Certain of Dominion’s merchant generation facilities are also subject to liens. See Item 7. MD&A for more information.

 

 

POWER GENERATION

Dominion and Virginia Power generate electricity for sale on a wholesale and a retail level. The Companies supply electricity demand either from their generation facilities or through purchased power contracts. As of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion Generation’s total utility and merchant generating capacity was 27,615approximately 27,500 MW.

24


The following tables list Dominion Generation’s utility and merchant generating units and capability, as of December 31, 2010:2012:

VIRGINIA POWER UTILITY GENERATION

 

Plant  Location   Net Summer
Capability (MW)
  Percentage
Net Summer
Capability
 

Coal

     

Mt. Storm

   Mt. Storm, WV     1,560   

Chesterfield

   Chester, VA     1,242   

Chesapeake

   Chesapeake, VA     595   

Clover

   Clover, VA     433(1)  

Yorktown

   Yorktown, VA     323   

Bremo

   Bremo Bluff, VA     227   

Mecklenburg

   Clarksville, VA     138   

North Branch

   Bayard, WV     74(2)  

Altavista

   Altavista, VA     63(2)  

Polyester

   Hopewell, VA     63   

Southampton

   Southampton, VA     63      

Total Coal

     4,781    26

Gas

     

Ladysmith (CT)

   Ladysmith, VA     783   

Remington (CT)

   Remington, VA     608   

Possum Point (CC)

   Dumfries, VA     559   

Chesterfield (CC)

   Chester, VA     397   

Elizabeth River (CT)

   Chesapeake, VA     348   

Possum Point

   Dumfries, VA     316   

Bellemeade (CC)

   Richmond, VA     267   

Gordonsville Energy (CC)

   Gordonsville, VA     218   

Rosemary (CC)

   Roanoke Rapids, VA     165   

Gravel Neck (CT)

   Surry, VA     170   

Darbytown (CT)

   Richmond, VA     168      

Total Gas

     3,999    22  

Nuclear

     

Surry

   Surry, VA     1,642   

North Anna

   Mineral, VA     1,638(3)     

Total Nuclear

     3,280    18  

Oil

     

Yorktown

   Yorktown, VA     818   

Possum Point

   Dumfries, VA     786   

Gravel Neck (CT)

   Surry, VA     198   

Darbytown (CT)

   Richmond, VA     168   

Chesapeake (CT)

   Chesapeake, VA     115   

Possum Point (CT)

   Dumfries, VA     72   

Low Moor (CT)

   Covington, VA     48   

Northern Neck (CT)

   Lively, VA     47   

Kitty Hawk (CT)

   Kitty Hawk, NC     31      

Total Oil

     2,283    12  

Hydro

     

Bath County

   Warm Springs, VA     1,802(4)  

Gaston

   Roanoke Rapids, NC     220   

Roanoke Rapids

   Roanoke Rapids, NC     95   

Other

   Various     3      

Total Hydro

     2,120    12  

Biomass

     

Pittsylvania

   Hurt, VA     83      

Various

     

Other

   Various     11      
         16,557      

Power Purchase Agreements

        1,861    10  

Total Utility Generation

        18,418    100

27


Plant  Location  

Net Summer

Capability (MW)

  

Percentage

Net Summer

Capability

 

Coal

     

Mt. Storm

  Mt. Storm, WV   1,599   

Chesterfield

  Chester, VA   1,267   

Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center

  Wise County, VA   600   

Chesapeake(1)

  Chesapeake, VA   595   

Clover

  Clover, VA   433(5)  

Yorktown(1)

  Yorktown, VA   323   

Bremo(2)

  Bremo Bluff, VA   227   

Mecklenburg

  Clarksville, VA   138   

Altavista(3),(4)

  Altavista, VA   63   

Hopewell(4)

  Hopewell, VA   63   

Southampton(4)

  Southampton, VA   63      

Total Coal

     5,371    28

Gas

     

Ladysmith (CT)

  Ladysmith, VA   783   

Remington (CT)

  Remington, VA   608   

Bear Garden (CC)

  Buckingham County, VA   590   

Possum Point (CC)

  Dumfries, VA   559   

Chesterfield (CC)

  Chester, VA   397   

Elizabeth River (CT)

  Chesapeake, VA   348   

Possum Point

  Dumfries, VA   316   

Bellemeade (CC)

  Richmond, VA   267   

Gordonsville Energy (CC)

  Gordonsville, VA   218   

Gravel Neck (CT)

  Surry, VA   170   

Darbytown (CT)

  Richmond, VA   168   

Rosemary (CC)

  Roanoke Rapids, NC   165      

Total Gas

     4,589    23  

Nuclear

     

Surry

  Surry, VA   1,678   

North Anna

  Mineral, VA   1,668(6)     

Total Nuclear

     3,346    17  

Oil

     

Yorktown

  Yorktown, VA   818   

Possum Point

  Dumfries, VA   786   

Gravel Neck (CT)

  Surry, VA   198   

Darbytown (CT)

  Richmond, VA   168   

Possum Point (CT)

  Dumfries, VA   72   

Chesapeake (CT)

  Chesapeake, VA   51   

Low Moor (CT)

  Covington, VA   48   

Northern Neck (CT)

  Lively, VA   47      

Total Oil

     2,188    11  

Hydro

     

Bath County

  Warm Springs, VA   1,802(7)  

Gaston

  Roanoke Rapids, NC   220   

Roanoke Rapids

  Roanoke Rapids, NC   95   

Other

  Various   3      

Total Hydro

     2,120    11  

Biomass

     

Pittsylvania

  Hurt, VA   83      

Various

     

Other

  Various   11      
       17,708      

Power Purchase Agreements

      1,887    10  

Total Utility Generation

      19,595    100

Note: (CT) denotes combustion turbine and (CC) denotes combined cycle.

(1)Excludes 50% undivided interest ownedCertain coal-fired units are expected to be retired at Chesapeake and Yorktown by ODEC.2015 as a result of the issuance of the MATS rule.
(2)Planned to convert to gas subject to necessary regulatory approvals.
(3)Facility has been placed into cold reserve status, but can be restarted within a reasonably short period if necessary. North Branch will be permanently retired upon commencement of commercial operations at the proposed Warren County power station currently under development.
(3)(4)In the first quarter of 2012, the facility received regulatory approval to convert to biomass.

25


(5)Excludes 50% undivided interest owned by ODEC.
(6)Excludes 11.6% undivided interest owned by ODEC.
(4)(7)Excludes 40% undivided interest owned by Allegheny Generating Company, a subsidiary of Allegheny Energy, Inc.

DOMINION MERCHANT GENERATION

 

Plant  Location   Net Summer
Capability (MW)
 Percentage
Net Summer
Capability
   Location  

Net Summer

Capability (MW)

 

Percentage

Net Summer

Capability

 

Coal

     

Kincaid

   Kincaid, IL     1,158(1)  

Brayton Point

   Somerset, MA     1,105   

State Line

   Hammond, IN     515   

Salem Harbor

   Salem, MA     314   

Morgantown

   Morgantown, WV     25(1),(2)  

Total Coal

     3,117    34

Nuclear

          

Millstone

   Waterford, CT     2,016(3)    Waterford, CT   2,016(5)  

Kewaunee

   Kewaunee, WI     556   

Kewaunee(1)

  Kewaunee, WI   556   

Total Nuclear

     2,572    28       2,572    33

Gas

          

Fairless (CC)

   Fairless Hills, PA     1,196(4)  

Elwood (CT)

   Elwood, IL     712(1),(5)  

Fairless (CC)(2),(3)

  Fairless Hills, PA   1,196   

Elwood (CT)(2),(4)

  Elwood, IL   712(6)  

Manchester (CC)

   Providence, RI     432     Providence, RI   432   

Total Gas

     2,340    25       2,340    30  

Coal

     

Kincaid(2),(4)

  Kincaid, IL   1,158   

Brayton Point(4)

  Somerset, MA   1,083   

Total Coal

     2,241    28  

Oil

          

Salem Harbor

   Salem, MA     438   

Brayton Point

   Somerset, MA     440   

Brayton Point(4)

  Somerset, MA   435   

Total Oil

     878    10       435    6  

Wind

          

Fowler Ridge

   Benton County, IN     150(1),(6)  

NedPower Mt. Storm

   Grant County, WV     132(1),(7)  

Fowler Ridge(2)

  Benton County, IN   150(7)  

NedPower Mt. Storm(2)

  Grant County, WV   132(8)  

Total Wind

     282    3       282    3  

Various

          

Other

   Various     8      

Brayton Point(4),(9)

  Somerset, MA   10      
          

Total Merchant Generation

      9,197    100      7,880    100

Note: (CT) denotes combustion turbine and (CC) denotes combined cycle.

(1)Subject to a lien securingIn the facility’s debt.fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced that it would permanently cease operations at Kewaunee in 2013 and commence decommissioning of this facility.
(2)Excludes 50% partnership interest owned by RCM Morgantown Power, Ltd.Subject to a lien securing the facility’s debt. Also see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on liens related to Kincaid and Hickory Power LLC. Dominion completed the sale of its partnership interest in this facility in January 2011.Fairless.
(3)Includes generating units that Dominion operates under leasing arrangements.
(4)In the third quarter of 2012, Dominion announced its decision to pursue the sale of Brayton Point, Kincaid and its 50% interest in Elwood.
(5)Excludes 6.53% undivided interest in Unit 3 owned by Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and Central Vermont Public ServiceGreen Mountain Power Corporation.
(4)Includes generating units that Dominion operates under leasing arrangements.
(5)Excludes 50% membership interest owned by J. POWER Elwood, LLC.
(6)Excludes 50% membership interest owned by BP.J-POWER Elwood, LLC.
(7)Excludes 50% membership interest owned by BP.
(8)Excludes 50% membership interest owned by Shell.
(9)Represents four diesel generators.

 

2826    

 


 

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, Dominion and Virginia Power are alleged to be in violation or in default under orders, statutes, rules or regulations relating to the environment, compliance plans imposed upon or agreed to by them,the Companies, or permits issued by various local, state andand/or federal agencies for the construction or operation of facilities. Administrative proceedings may also be pending on these matters. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, the Companies and their subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings. Dominion and Virginia Power believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on their financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

SeeRegulation in Item 1. Business,Future Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A, which information is incorporated herein by reference and Notes 14 and 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on various environmental, rate matters and other regulatory proceedings to which Dominion and Virginia Power are parties.

In February 2008, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at State Line and Kincaid. In April 2009, Dominion received a second request for information. Dominion provided information in response to both requests. Also in April 2009, Dominion received a Notice and Finding of Violations from the EPA claiming new source review violations new source performance standards violations,of the CAA New Source Review requirements, NSPS, and Title V permit program violations pursuant toand the CAA and thestations’ respective State Implementation Plans. The Notice states that the EPA may issue an order requiring compliance with the relevant CAA provisions and may seek injunctive relief and/or civil penalties, all pursuant to the EPA’s enforcement authority under the CAA. Dominion cannot predict the outcome of this matter. However, an adverse resolution could have a material effect on future results of operations and/or cash flows.

In May 2010, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at Brayton Point and Salem Harbor.Point. Dominion submitted its response to the request in November 20102010.

Dominion believes that it complied with applicable laws and cannot predict the EPA regulations and interpretations in effect at the time the work in question took place. The CAA authorizes maximum civil penalties of $25,000 to $37,500 per day, per violation at each generating unit, depending on the date of the alleged violation. In addition to any such penalties that may be awarded, an adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures or affect the timing of this matter.currently budgeted capital expenditures. Dominion is currently in settlement discussions to resolve these matters. However, there can be no assurance that Dominion will reach a settlement with the EPA. Dominion does not believe that final resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

See Notes 13 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements andFuture Issues and Other Mattersin MD&A, which information is incorporated herein by reference, for discussion of various environmental and other regulatory proceedings to which the Companies are a party.

Item 4. (Removed and reserved)Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 

 

29

27

 


Executive Officers of Dominion

 

 

Information concerning the executive officers of Dominion, each of whom is elected annually, is as follows:

 

Name and Age  Business Experience Past Five Years(1)

Thomas F. Farrell II (56)(58)

  Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dominion from April 2007 to date; President and CEO of Dominion from January 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of Virginia Power from February 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and CEO of CNG from January 2006 to June 2007; Director of Dominion from March 2005 to April 2007.date.

Mark F. McGettrick (53)(55)

  Executive Vice President and CFO of Dominion and Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from April 2006 to May 2009; President and COO—GenerationCOO-Generation of Virginia Power from February 2006 to May 2009.

Paul D. Koonce (51)(53)

  Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer – Energy Infrastructure Group of Dominion from April 2006February 2013 to date; President and COO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President and COO—Energy of Virginia PowerDominion from FebruaryApril 2006 to September 2007.February 2013.

David A. Christian (56)(58)

  Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer – Dominion Generation Group of Dominion from February 2013 to date; President and COO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from May 2011 to February 2013; President and CNO of Virginia Power from October 2007 to May 2009; Senior Vice President—Nuclear Operations and CNO of Virginia Power from April 2000 to September 2007.2009.

David A. Heacock (53)(55)

  President and CNO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Senior Vice President of Dominion and President and COO—DVPCOO-DVP of Virginia Power from June 2008 to May 2009; Senior Vice President—DVPPresident-DVP of Virginia Power from October 2007 to May 2008; Senior Vice President—Fossil & Hydro of Virginia Power from April 2005 to September 2007.2008.

Gary L. Sypolt (57)(59)

  Executive Vice President of Dominion from May 2011 to date; President of DTI from June 2009 to date; President—TransmissionPresident-Transmission of DTI from January 2003 to May 2009; President and COO—Transmission of Virginia Power from February 2006 to September 2007.2009.

Robert M. Blue (43)(45)

  Senior Vice President—Law,President-Law, Public Policy and Environment of Virginia Power, Dominion and DRSVirginia Power from January 2011 to date; Senior Vice President—PublicPresident-Public Policy and Environment of Dominion and DRS from February 2010 to December 2010; Senior Vice President—PublicPresident-Public Policy and Corporate Communications of Dominion and DRS from May 2008 to January 2010; Vice President—StatePresident-State and Federal Affairs of DRS from September 2006 to May 2008; Managing Director State Affairs and Corporate Policy of DRS from July 2005 to August 2006.2008.

Steven A. Rogers (49)(51)(2)

  Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Dominion and President and Chief Administrative Officer of DRS from October 2007 to date;December 2012; Senior Vice President and CAO of Dominion and Virginia Power from January 2007 to September 2007 and CNG from January 2007 to June 2007; Senior Vice President and Controller of Dominion and CNG from April 2006 to December 2006; Senior Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer of Virginia Power from April 2006 to December 2006; Vice President and Controller of Dominion and CNG and Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer of Virginia Power from June 2000 to April 2006.2007.

Ashwini Sawhney (61)(63)

  Vice President—AccountingPresident-Accounting and Controller (CAO) of Dominion from May 2010 to date; Vice President and Controller (CAO) of Dominion from July 2009 to May 2010; Vice President—AccountingPresident-Accounting of Virginia Power from April 2006 to date; Vice President and Controller of Dominion from April 2007 to June 2009; Vice President—Accounting and Controller of Dominion from January 2007 to April 2007 and of CNG from January 2007 to June 2007; Vice President—Accounting of Dominion and CNG from April 2006 to December 2006; Assistant Corporate Controller of Dominion from June 2002 to April 2006; Assistant Corporate Controller of Virginia Power from January 1999 to April 2006.2009.

 

(1)Any service listed for Virginia Power, CNG, DTI and DRS reflects service at a subsidiary of Dominion.
(2)Steven A. Rogers ceased to be an executive officer of Dominion as of January 1, 2013.

 

3028    

 


Part II

 

 

 

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Dominion

Dominion’s common stock is listed on the NYSE. At January 31, 2011,2013, there were approximately 144,000139,000 record holders of Dominion’s common stock. The number of record holders is comprised of individual shareholder accounts maintained on Dominion’s transfer agent records and includes accounts with shares held in (1) certificate form, (2) book-entry in the Direct Registration System and (3) book-entry under Dominion’s direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan.Dominion Direct. Discussions of theexpected dividend payments and restrictions on Dominion’s payment of dividends required by this Item are contained inDividend RestrictionsLiquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7. MD&A and Notes 1817 and 2120 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Cash dividends were paid quarterly in 20102012 and 2009.2011. Quarterly information concerning stock prices and dividends is disclosed in Note 2826 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table presents certain information with respect to Dominion’s common stock repurchases during the fourth quarter of 2010.2012:

 

 

DOMINION PURCHASESOF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Period  Total
Number
of Shares
(or Units)
Purchased(1)
   

Average
Price

Paid per
Share
(or Unit)(2)

   Total Number
of Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part
of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
   

Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that May

Yet Be Purchased under the

Plans or Programs(3)

 

10/1/2010-10/31/10

   1,821    $43.66     N/A    32,586,412 shares/$1.78 billion  

11/1/2010-11/30/10

   2,708    $43.46     N/A    32,586,412 shares/$1.78 billion  

12/1/2010-12/31/10

   956    $42.03     N/A    32,586,412 shares/$1.78 billion  

Total

   5,485    $43.28     N/A    32,586,412 shares/$1.78 billion  
Period  

Total

Number

of Shares

(or Units)

Purchased(1)

   Average
Price
Paid per
Share
(or Unit)(2)
   

Total Number

of Shares (or Units)

Purchased as Part

of Publicly Announced

Plans or Programs

   

Maximum Number (or

Approximate Dollar Value)

of Shares (or Units) that May

Yet Be Purchased under the

Plans or Programs(3)

 

10/1/2012-10/31/12

   467    $52.81     N/A    19,629,059 shares/$1.18 billion  

11/1/2012-11/30/12

       $     N/A    19,629,059 shares/$1.18 billion  

12/1/2012-12/31/12

       $     N/A    19,629,059 shares/$1.18 billion  

Total

   467    $52.81     N/A    19,629,059 shares/$1.18 billion  

 

(1)SharesIn October 2012, 467 shares were tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted and goal-based stock.
(2)Represents the weighted-average price paid per share.
(3)The remaining repurchase authorization is pursuant to repurchase authority granted by the Dominion Board of Directors in February 2005, as modified in June 2007. The aggregate authorization granted by the Dominion Board of Directors was 86 million shares (as adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split distributed in November 2007) not to exceed $4 billion.

Virginia Power

There is no established public trading market for Virginia Power’s common stock, all of which is owned by Dominion. Restrictions on Virginia Power’s payment of dividends are discussed inDividend Restrictions in MD&A and Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Virginia Power paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock as follows:

    First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Full
Year
 
(millions)                    

2010

  $108    $81    $171    $140    $500  

2009

   101     75     190     97     463  

31


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Dominion

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009(1)   2008(1)   2007(1)  2006(1) 
(millions, except per share amounts)                  

Operating revenue

  $15,197   $14,798    $15,895    $14,456   $16,893  

Income from continuing operations before extraordinary item(2)

   2,963    1,261     1,644     2,661    1,725  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(2)

   (155  26     190     36    (345

Extraordinary item, net of tax(2)

   —      —       —       (158  —    

Net income attributable to Dominion

   2,808    1,287     1,834     2,539    1,380  

Income from continuing operations before extraordinary item per common share-basic

   5.03    2.13     2.84     4.09    2.46  

Net income attributable to Dominion per common share-basic

   4.77    2.17     3.17     3.90    1.97  

Income from continuing operations before extraordinary item per common share-diluted

   5.02    2.13     2.83     4.06    2.45  

Net income attributable to Dominion per common share-diluted

   4.76    2.17     3.16     3.88    1.96  

Dividends paid per common share

   1.83    1.75     1.58     1.46    1.38  

Total assets

   42,817    42,554     42,053     39,139    49,296  

Long-term debt

   15,758    15,481     14,956     13,235    14,791  

(1)Recast to reflect the discontinued operations of Peoples as described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Amounts attributable to Dominion’s common shareholders.

2010 results include a $1.4 billion after-tax net income benefit from the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations, net of charges related to the divestiture and a $206 million after-tax charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, as discussed in Notes 4 and 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively. Also in 2010, Dominion recorded $127 million of after-tax impairment charges at certain merchant generation facilities, as discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The loss from discontinued operations in 2010 includes a $140 million after-tax loss on the sale of Peoples.

2009 results include a $435 million after-tax charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also in 2009, Dominion recorded a $281 million after-tax ceiling test impairment charge related to the carrying value of its E&P properties.

2008 results include $109 million of after-tax charges reflecting other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of certain securities held as investments in nuclear decommissioning trusts. In addition, income from discontinued operations in 2008 includes a $120 million after-tax benefit due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities associated with the sale of Peoples.

2007 results include a $1.5 billion after-tax benefit from the disposition of Dominion’s non-Appalachian E&P operations and a $252 million after-tax impairment charge associated with the sale of Dresden. Also in 2007, Dominion recorded a $137 million after-tax charge resulting from the termination of the long-term power sales agreement associated with State Line. In addition, the reapplication of accounting guidance for cost-based rate regulation to the Virginia jurisdiction of Virginia Power’s generation operations in 2007 resulted in a $158 million after-tax extraordinary charge.

2006 reflects the net impact of the discontinued operations of Peoples sold in 2010, Canadian E&P operations sold in June 2007 and the Peaker facilities sold in March 2007. Discontinued operations for Peoples includes a $119 million after-tax charge primarily due to the recognition of deferred tax liabilities, as well as a $114 million after-tax charge resulting from the write-off of certain regulatory assets, both in connection with the sale. Discontinued operations for the Peaker facilities includes a $164 million after-tax impairment charge to reduce the facilities’ carrying amounts to their estimated fair values less cost to sell.

Virginia Power

There is no established public trading market for Virginia Power’s common stock, all of which is owned by Dominion. Restrictions on Virginia Power’s payment of dividends are discussed inDividend Restrictions in Item 7. MD&A and Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Virginia Power paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock as follows:

Year Ended December 31,  2010   2009   2008   2007  2006 
(millions)                   

Operating revenue

  $7,219    $6,584    $6,934    $6,181   $5,603  

Income from operations before extraordinary item

   852     356     864     606    478  

Extraordinary item, net of tax

   —       —       —       (158  —    

Net income

   852     356     864     448    478  

Balance available for common stock

   835     339     847     432    462  

Total assets

   22,262     20,118     18,802     17,063    15,683  

Long-term debt

   6,702     6,213     6,000     5,316    3,619  

    First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Full
Year
 
(millions)                    

2012

  $149    $120    $110    $180    $559  

2011

   131     118     199     109     557  

29


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

DOMINION

Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010  2009   2008 
(millions, except per share amounts)                 

Operating revenue

  $13,093   $14,145   $14,927   $14,575    $15,594  

Income from continuing operations, net of tax(1)

   324    1,433    3,066    1,276     1,599  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)

   (22  (25  (258  11     235  

Net income attributable to Dominion

   302    1,408    2,808    1,287     1,834  

Income from continuing operations before loss from discontinued operations per common share-basic

   0.57    2.50    5.21    2.15     2.76  

Net income attributable to Dominion per common share-basic

   0.53    2.46    4.77    2.17     3.17  

Income from continuing operations before loss from discontinued operations per common share-diluted

   0.57    2.49    5.20    2.15     2.75  

Net income attributable to Dominion per common share-diluted

   0.53    2.45    4.76    2.17     3.16  

Dividends declared per common share

   2.11    1.97    1.83    1.75     1.58  

Total assets

   46,838    45,614    42,817    42,554     42,053  

Long-term debt

   16,851    17,394    15,758    15,481     14,956  

(1)Amounts attributable to Dominion’s common shareholders.

2012 results include a $1.0 billion after-tax impairment charge due to bids received for Brayton Point and Kincaid and a $303 million after-tax charge primarily resulting from management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013.

2011 results include a $139 million after-tax charge reflecting generation plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain utility coal-fired generating units and a $59 million after-tax charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

2010 results include a $1.4 billion after-tax net income benefit from the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations, net of charges related to the divestiture and a $202 million after-tax charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, as discussed in Notes 3 and 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively. The loss from discontinued operations in 2010 includes $127 million of after-tax impairment charges at certain merchant generation facilities and a $140 million after-tax loss on the sale of Peoples.

2009 results include a $435 million after-tax charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings. Also in 2009, Dominion recorded a $281 million after-tax ceiling test impairment charge related to the carrying value of its Appalachian E&P properties.

2008 results include $109 million of after-tax charges reflecting other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of certain securities held as investments in nuclear decommissioning trusts. In addition, income from discontinued operations in 2008 includes a $120 million after-tax benefit due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities associated with the sale of Peoples.

VIRGINIA POWER

Year Ended December 31,  2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 
(millions)                    

Operating revenue

  $7,226    $7,246    $7,219    $6,584    $6,934  

Net income

   1,050     822     852     356     864  

Balance available for common stock

   1,034     805     835     339     847  

Total assets

   24,811     23,544     22,262     20,118     18,802  

Long-term debt

   6,251     6,246     6,702     6,213     6,000  

2012 results include a $53 million after-tax charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms.

2011 results include a $139 million after-tax charge reflecting generation plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain coal-fired generating units and a $59 million after-tax charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

2010 results include a $123 million after-tax charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, discussed in Note 2322 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2009 results include a $427 million after-tax charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2007 results reflect the reapplication of accounting guidance for cost-based rate regulation to the Virginia jurisdiction of Virginia Power’s generation operations, which resulted in a $158 million after-tax extraordinary charge.proceedings.

 

3230    

 


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

 

MD&A discusses Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s results of operations and general financial condition. MD&A should be read in conjunction with Item 1. Business and the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

 

CONTENTSOF MD&A

MD&A consists of the following information:

Ÿ 

Forward-Looking Statements

Ÿ 

Accounting Matters

Ÿ 

Dominion

 Ÿ 

Results of Operations

 Ÿ 

Segment Results of Operations

Ÿ 

Virginia Power

 Ÿ 

Results of Operations

 Ÿ 

Segment Results of Operations

Ÿ

Selected Information—Energy Trading Activities

Ÿ 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Ÿ 

Future Issues and Other Matters

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains statements concerning Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s expectations, plans, objectives, future financial performance and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In most cases, the reader can identify these forward-looking statements by such words as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “expect,” “believe,” “should,” “could,” “plan,” “may,” “continue,” “target” or other similar words.

Dominion and Virginia Power make forward-looking statements with full knowledge that risks and uncertainties exist that may cause actual results to differ materially from predicted results. Factors that may cause actual results to differ are often presented with the forward-looking statements themselves. Additionally, other factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement. These factors include but are not limited to:

Ÿ 

Unusual weather conditions and their effect on energy sales to customers and energy commodity prices;

Ÿ 

Extreme weather events and other natural disasters, including hurricanes, high winds, and severe storms, earthquakes and changes in water temperature and availability that can cause outages and property damage to facilities;

Ÿ 

Federal, state and local legislative and regulatory developments;

Ÿ 

Changes to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those related to climate change, the tightening of emission or discharge limits for GHGs and other emissions, more extensive permitting requirements and the regulation of additional substances;

Ÿ 

Cost of environmental compliance, including those costs related to climate change;

Ÿ 

Risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities, including costs associated with the disposal of spent nuclear fuel, decommissioning, plant maintenance and changes in existing regulations governing such facilities;

Ÿ 

Unplanned outages of the Companies’ facilities;

Ÿ 

Fluctuations in energy-related commodity prices and the effect these could have on Dominion’s earnings and Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s liquidity position and the underlying value of their assets;

Ÿ 

Counterparty credit and performance risk;

Ÿ 

Capital market conditions, including the availability of credit and the ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms;

Ÿ 

Risks associated with Virginia Power’s membership and participation in PJM, including risks related to obligations created by the default of other participants;

Ÿ 

Price risk due to investments held in nuclear decommissioning trusts by Dominion and Virginia Power and in benefit plan trusts by Dominion;

Ÿ 

Fluctuations in interest rates;

Ÿ 

Changes in federal and state tax laws and regulations;

Ÿ 

Changes in rating agency requirements or credit ratings and their effect on availability and cost of capital;

Ÿ 

Changes in financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by governing bodies;

Ÿ 

Employee workforce factors including collective bargaining agreements and labor negotiations with union employees;

Ÿ 

The risksRisks of operating businesses in regulated industries that are subject to changing regulatory structures;

Ÿ

Impacts of acquisitions, divestitures and retirements of assets based on asset portfolio reviews;

Ÿ 

Receipt of approvals for, and timing of, closing dates for acquisitions and divestitures;

Ÿ 

Changes in rules for RTOs and ISOs in which Dominion and Virginia Power participate, including changes in rate designs and new and evolving capacity models;

Ÿ 

Political and economic conditions, including the threat of domestic terrorism, inflation and deflation;

Ÿ 

Industrial,Domestic terrorism and other threats to the Companies’ physical and intangible assets, as well as threats to cybersecurity;

Ÿ

Changes in demand for the Companies’ services, including industrial, commercial and residential growth or decline in the Companies’ service areas, and changes in customer growth or usage patterns, including as a result of energy conservation programs;programs, and changes in demand for Dominion’s natural gas services;

Ÿ 

Additional competition in the electric industry, including in electric markets in which Dominion’s merchant generation facilities operate;operate, and competition in the construction and ownership of electric transmission facilities in Virginia Power’s service territory, in connection with FERC Order 1000;

Ÿ 

Changes in technology, particularly with respect to new, developing or alternative sources of generation and smart grid technologies;

Ÿ 

Changes to regulated electric rates collected by Virginia Power and regulated gas distribution, transportation and storage rates, including LNG storage, collected by Dominion;

Ÿ 

Timing and receipt of regulatory approvals necessary for planned construction or expansion projects;

Ÿ 

The inability to complete planned construction projects within the terms and time frames initially anticipated; and

Ÿ 

Adverse outcomes in litigation matters.matters or regulatory proceedings.

Additionally, other risks that could cause actual results to differ from predicted results are set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

31


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

ACCOUNTING MATTERS

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Dominion and Virginia Power have identified the following accounting policies, including certain inherent estimates, that as a result of the judgments, uncertainties, uniqueness and complexities of the underlying accounting standards and operations involved, could result in material changes to their financial condition or results of operations under different conditions or using different assumptions. Dominion and Virginia Power have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of each of these policies with the Audit CommitteeCommittees of their BoardBoards of Directors. Virginia Power’s Board of Directors also serves as its Audit Committee.

33


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

ACCOUNTINGFOR REGULATED OPERATIONS

The accounting for Virginia Power’s regulated electric and Dominion’s regulated gas operations differs from the accounting for nonregulated operations in that they are required to reflect the effect of rate regulation in their Consolidated Financial Statements. For regulated businesses subject to federal or state cost-of-service rate regulation, regulatory practices that assign costs to accounting periods may differ from accounting methods generally applied by nonregulated companies. When it is probable that regulators will permit the recovery of current costs through future rates charged to customers, these costs are deferred as regulatory assets that otherwise would be expensed by nonregulated companies. Likewise, regulatory liabilities are recognized when it is probable that regulators will require customer refunds through future rates or when revenue is collected from customers for expenditures that have yet to be incurred. Generally, regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized into income over the period authorized by the regulator.

The Companies evaluate whether or not recovery of their regulatory assets through future rates is probable and make various assumptions in their analyses. The expectations of future recovery are generally based on orders issued by regulatory commissions or historical experience, as well as discussions with applicable regulatory authorities. If recovery of a regulatory asset is determined to be less than probable, it will be written off in the period such assessment is made. The Companies currently believe the recovery of their regulatory assets is probable. See Notes 1312 and 1413 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements for additional information.

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

Dominion and Virginia Power recognize liabilities for the expected cost of retiring tangible long-lived assets for which a legal obligation exists.exists and the ARO can be reasonably estimated. These AROs are recognized at fair value as incurred and are capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived assets. In the absence of quoted market prices, the Companies estimate the fair value of their AROs using present value techniques, in which they make various assumptions including estimates of the amounts and timing of future cash flows associated with retirement activities, credit-adjusted risk free rates and cost escalation rates. AROs currently reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were measured during a period of historically low interest rates. The impact on measurements of new AROs or remeasurements of existing AROs, using different cost escalation rates in the future, may be significant. When the Companies revise any assumptions used to calculate the fair value of existing AROs, they adjust the carrying amount of both the ARO liability and the related long-lived asset. The Companies accrete the ARO liability to reflect the passage of time.

In 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, Dominion recognized $85$77 million, $89$84 million and $94$85 million, respectively, of accretion, and expects to recognize $81$88 million in 2011.2013. In 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, Virginia Power recognized $35$34 million, $35$36 million and $38$35 million, respectively, of accretion, and expects to recognize $37$38 million in 2011.2013. Virginia Power records accretion and depreciation associated with utility nuclear decommissioning AROs as an adjustment to its regulatory liability for nuclear decommissioning.

A significant portion of the Companies’ AROs relates to the future decommissioning of Dominion’s merchant and Virginia

Power’s utility nuclear facilities. These nuclear decommissioning AROs are reported in the Dominion Generation segment. At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion’s nuclear decommissioning AROs totaled $1.4$1.5 billion, representing approximately 87%86% of its total AROs. At December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning AROs totaled $620$633 million, representing approximately 92%90% of its total AROs. Based on their significance, the following discussion of critical assumptions inherent in determining the fair value of AROs relates to those associated with the Companies’ nuclear decommissioning obligations.

The Companies obtain from third-party specialists periodic site-specific base year cost studies in order to estimate the nature, cost and timing of planned decommissioning activities for their nuclear plants. These cost studies are based on relevant information available at the time they are performed; however, estimates of future cash flows for extended periods of time are by nature highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results. In addition, the Companies’ cost estimates include cost escalation rates that are applied to the base year costs. The selection of these cost escalation rates is dependent on subjective factors which are considered to be a critical assumption.

The Companies determine cost escalation rates, which represent projected cost increases over time due to both general inflation and increases in the cost of specific decommissioning activities, for each nuclear facility. As a resultThe selection of the updated decommissioningthese cost studies and applicable escalation rates obtained in 2009,is dependent on subjective factors which are considered to be a critical assumption.

In September 2012, Dominion recorded a decreasean increase of $309 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs of its units, including a $103 million ($62 million after-tax) reduction in other operations and maintenance expense due to a downward revision in the nuclear decommissioning ARO for a power station unit that is no longer in service. Virginia Power recorded a decrease of $119$246 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. The ARO revision was primarily driven by management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013. Virginia Power recorded an increase of $43 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. The ARO revision was driven by an increase in estimated costs. In December 2011, Dominion recorded a decrease of $290 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. Virginia Power recorded a decrease of $95 million in the nuclear decommissioning AROs for its units. The ARO revision in 2011 was driven by a reduction in anticipated future decommissioning costs due to the expected future recovery from the DOE of certain spent fuel costs based on the Companies’ contracts with the DOE for disposal of spent nuclear fuel, as well as updated escalation rates.

INCOME TAXES

Judgment and the use of estimates are required in developing the provision for income taxes and reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities. The interpretation of tax laws involves uncertainty, since tax authorities may interpret the laws differently. Ultimate resolution of income tax matters may result in favorable or unfavorable impacts to net income and cash flows, and adjustments to tax-related assets and liabilities could be material.

32


Given the uncertainty and judgment involved in the determination and filing of income taxes, there are standards for recognition and measurement in financial statements of positions taken or expected to be taken by an entity in its income tax returns. Positions taken by an entity in its income tax returns that are recognized in the financial statements must satisfy a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, assuming that the position will be examined by tax authorities with full knowledge of all relevant information. At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had $307$293 million and Virginia Power had $117$57 million of unrecognized tax benefits. For a substantial amount of these unrecognized tax benefits, the ultimate deductibility is highly certain, but there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded representing future effects on income taxes for temporary differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Dominion and Virginia Power evaluate quar-

34


terlyquarterly the probability of realizing deferred tax assets by reviewing a forecast ofconsidering current and historical financial results, expectations for future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies that can be implemented, if necessary, to realize deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income or successfully implement tax planning strategies may affect the realization of deferred tax assets. The Companies establish a valuation allowance when it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had established $68$93 million of valuation allowances and Virginia Power had no valuation allowances.

ACCOUNTINGFOR DERIVATIVE CONTRACTSAND OTHER INSTRUMENTSAT FAIR VALUE

Dominion and Virginia Power use derivative contracts such as futures, swaps, forwards, options and FTRs to manage commodity and financial market risks of their business operations. Derivative contracts, with certain exceptions, are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Accounting requirements for derivatives and related hedging activities are complex and may be subject to further clarification by standard-setting bodies. The majority of investments held in Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning and Dominion’s rabbi and benefit plan trust funds are also subject to fair value accounting. See Notes 76 and 2221 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on these fair value measurements.

Fair value is based on actively-quoted market prices, if available. In the absence of actively-quoted market prices, management seeks indicative price information from external sources, including broker quotes and industry publications. When evaluating pricing information provided by brokers and other pricing services, the Companies consider whether the broker is willing and able to trade at the quoted price, if the broker quotes are based on an active market or an inactive market and the extent to which brokers are utilizing a particular model if pricing is not readily available. If pricing information from external sources is not available, or if the Companies believe that observable pricing information is not indicative of fair value, judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value. In those cases, the Companies must estimate prices based on available historical and near-term future price information and use of statistical methods, including regression analysis, that reflect their market assumptions.

The Companies maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

USEOF ESTIMATESIN GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT TESTING

As of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion reported $3.1 billion of goodwill in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. A significant portion resulted from the acquisition of the former CNG in 2000.

In April of each year, Dominion tests its goodwill for potential impairment, and performs additional tests more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change in the interim that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010 annual tests and any interim tests did not result in the recognition of any goodwill impairment.

In general, Dominion estimates the fair value of its reporting units by using a combination of discounted cash flows and other valuation techniques that use multiples of earnings for peer group companies and analyses of recent business combinations involving

peer group companies. For Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations and Peoples and Hope and certain DCI operations, negotiated sales prices were used as fair value for the tests conducted in 2010, 2009 and 2008.2010. Fair value estimates are dependent on subjective factors such as Dominion’s estimate of future cash flows, the selection of appropriate discount and growth rates, and the selection of peer group companies and recent transactions. These underlying assumptions and estimates are made as of a point in time; subsequent modifications, particularly changes in discount rates or growth rates inherent in Dominion’s estimates of future cash flows, could result in a future impairment of goodwill. Although Dominion has consistently applied the same methods in developing the assumptions and estimates that underlie the fair value calculations, such as estimates of future cash flows, and based those estimates on relevant information available at the time, such cash flow estimates are highly uncertain by nature and may vary significantly from actual results. If the estimates of future cash flows used in the most recent tests had been 10% lower, the resulting fair values would have still been greater than the carrying values of each of those reporting units tested, indicating that no impairment was present. See Note 1211 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

USEOF ESTIMATESIN LONG--LLIVEDIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT TESTING

Impairment testing for an individual or group of long-lived assets or for intangible assets with definite lives is required when circumstances indicate those assets may be impaired. When an asset’s carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted estimated future cash flows associated with the asset, the asset is considered impaired to the extent that the asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. Performing an impairment test on long-lived assets involves judgment in areas such as identifying if circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, identifying and grouping affected assets, and developing the undiscounted and discounted estimated future cash flows (used to estimate fair value in the absence of market-based value) associated with the asset, including probability weighting such cash flows to reflect expectations about possible variations in their amounts or timing, expectations about operating the long-lived assets and the

33


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

selection of an appropriate discount rate. Although cash flow estimates are based on relevant information available at the time the estimates are made, estimates of future cash flows are, by nature, highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results. For example, estimates of future cash flows would contemplate factors which may change over time, such as the expected use of the asset, including future production and sales levels, and expected fluctuations of prices of commodities sold and consumed.consumed and expected proceeds from dispositions. See Note 76 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of impairments related to certain long-lived assets.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Dominion sponsors noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for eligible active employees, retirees and qualifying dependents. The projected costs of providing benefits under these plans are dependent, in part, on historical information such as employee demographics, the level of contributions made to the plans and earnings on plan assets. Assumptions about the future, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, discount rates applied to benefit

35


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

obligations and the anticipated rate of increase in healthcare costs and participant compensation, also have a significant impact on employee benefit costs. The impact of changes in these factors, as well as differences between Dominion’s assumptions and actual experience, is generally recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the remaining average service period of plan participants, rather than immediately.

The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates and healthcare cost trend rates are critical assumptions. Dominion determines the expected long-term rates of return on plan assets for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans by using a combination of:

Ÿ 

Expected inflation and risk-free interest rate assumptions;

Ÿ

Historical return analysis to determine expectedlong term historic returns as well as historic risk premiums for various asset classes;

Ÿ

Expected future risk premiums, asset volatilities and correlations;

Ÿ 

Forward-looking return expectations derived from the yield on long-term bonds and the price earnings ratiosexpected long-term returns of major stock market indices;

Ÿ

Expected inflation and risk-free interest rate assumptions; and

Ÿ 

Investment allocation of plan assets. The strategic target asset allocation for Dominion’s pension funds is 28% U.S. equity, 18% non-U.S. equity, 33% fixed income, 3% real estate and 18% other alternative investments, such as private equity investments.

Strategic investment policies are established for each of Dominion’s prefunded benefit plans based upon periodic asset/liability studies. Factors considered in setting the investment policy include those mentioned above such as employee demographics, liability growth rates, future discount rates, the funded status of the plans and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Deviations from the plans’ strategic allocation are a function of Dominion’s assessments regarding short-term risk and reward opportunities in the capital markets and/or short-term market movements which result in the plans’ actual asset allocations varying from the strategic target asset allocations. Through periodic rebalancing, actual allocations are brought back in line with the target. Future asset/

liability studies will focus on strategies to further reduce pension and other postretirement plan risk, while still achieving attractive levels of returns.

Dominion develops assumptions, which are then compared to the forecasts of otheran independent investment advisorsadvisor to ensure reasonableness. An internal committee selects the final assumptions. Dominion calculated its pension cost using an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption of 8.50% for 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008.2010. Dominion calculated its other postretirement benefit cost using an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption of 7.75% for 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008.2010. The rate used in calculating other postretirement benefit cost is lower than the rate used in calculating pension cost because of differences in the relative amounts of various types of investments held as plan assets.

Dominion determines discount rates from analyses of AA/Aa rated bonds with cash flows matching the expected payments to be made under its plans. The discount rates used to calculate pension cost and other postretirement benefit cost were 5.50% in 2012, 5.90% in 2011 and 6.60% in 2010 and 2009, compared to 6.60% and 6.50%, respectively, in 2008.2010. Dominion selected a discount rate of 5.90%4.40% for determining its December 31, 20102012 projected pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.

Dominion establishes the healthcare cost trend rate assumption based on analyses of various factors including the specific provisions of its medical plans, actual cost trends experienced and projected, and demographics of plan participants. Dominion’s healthcare cost trend rate assumption as of December 31, 2010 is 7.0%2012 was 7% and is expected to gradually decrease to 4.60% by 20602061 and continue at that rate for years thereafter.

The following table illustrates the effect on cost of changing the critical actuarial assumptions previously discussed, while holding all other assumptions constant:

 

     Increase in Net Periodic Cost      Increase in Net Periodic Cost 
  Change in
Actuarial
Assumption
 Pension
Benefits
   Other
Postretirement
Benefits
   Change in
Actuarial
Assumption
 Pension
Benefits
   Other
Postretirement
Benefits
 
(millions, except percentages)                    

Discount rate

   (0.25)%  $13    $5     (0.25)%  $17    $4  

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   (0.25)%   13     3     (0.25)%   13     3  

Healthcare cost trend rate

   1.00  N/A     23     1  N/A     17  

In addition to the effects on cost, at December 31, 2010,2012, a 0.25% decrease in the discount rate would increase Dominion’s projected pension benefit obligation by $138$219 million and its accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by $52$54 million, while a 1.00% increase in the healthcare cost trend rate would increase its accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by $217$218 million. See Note 2221 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

REVENUE RECOGNITION—UNBILLED REVENUE

Virginia Power recognizes and records revenues when energy is delivered to the customer. The determination of sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each month, the amountsamount of electric energy delivered to customers, but not yet billed, is estimated and recorded as unbilled revenue. This estimate is reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on meter readings. Virginia

34


Power’s customer receivables included $397$348 million and $355$360 million of accrued unbilled revenue at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

The calculation of unbilled revenues is complex and includes numerous estimates and assumptions including historical usage, applicable customer rates, weather factors and total daily electric generation supplied, adjusted for line losses. Changes in generation patterns, customer usage patterns and other factors, which are the basis for the estimates of unbilled revenues, could have a significant effect on the calculation and therefore on Virginia Power’s results of operations and financial condition.

Other

ACCOUNTING STANDARDSAND POLICIES

During 2009 and 2008, Dominion and Virginia Power were required to adopt several new accounting standards, which are discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

36


DOMINION

 

 

RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of Dominion’s consolidated results:

 

Year Ended

December 31,

  2010   $ Change   2009   $ Change 2008   2012   $ Change 2011   $ Change 2010 
(millions, except EPS)                                  

Net Income attributable to Dominion

  $2,808    $1,521    $1,287    $(547 $1,834    $302    $(1,106 $1,408    $(1,400 $2,808  

Diluted EPS

   4.76     2.59     2.17     (0.99  3.16     0.53     (1.92  2.45     (2.31  4.76  

Overview

20102012VS. 20092011

Net income attributable to Dominion increaseddecreased by 118%79%. Unfavorable drivers include impairment and other charges related to bids received for Brayton Point and Kincaid and management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013. Favorable drivers include the absence of an impairment charge related to certain utility coal-fired power stations and the absence of restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene recorded in 2011.

2011VS. 2010

Net income attributable to Dominion decreased by 50%. Unfavorable drivers include the absence of a gain on the sale of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations, lower ceiling test impairment charges related to these properties, the absence of a charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedingsmargins from merchant generation operations, and the impact of less favorable weather, including Hurricane Irene, on electric utility operations. UnfavorableFavorable drivers include the absence of charges related to a workforce reduction program and the absence of a loss on the sale of Peoples, lower marginsand higher earnings from merchant generation operations and impairment charges related to certain merchant generation facilities.

2009VS. 2008

Net income attributable to Dominion decreased by 30%. Unfavorable drivers include an impairment charge related to the carrying value of Dominion’s E&P properties due to declines in gas and oil prices during the first quarter of 2009 and a charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings. Favorable drivers include higher margins in Dominion’s merchant generation operations and a higher contribution from Dominion’s gas transmission operations due to the completion of the Cove Point expansion project.adjustment clauses.

Analysis of Consolidated Operations

Presented below are selected amounts related to Dominion’s results of operations:

Year Ended) December 31, 2010  $ Change  2009  $ Change  2008 
(millions)               

Operating Revenue

 $15,197   $399   $14,798   $(1,097 $15,895  

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

  4,150    (135  4,285    262    4,023  

Purchased electric capacity

  453    42    411        411  

Purchased gas

  2,050    (150  2,200    (966  3,166  

Net Revenue

  8,544    642    7,902    (393  8,295  

Other operations and maintenance

  3,724    12    3,712    428    3,284  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  1,055    (83  1,138    104    1,034  

Other taxes

  532    49    483    (10  493  

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations

  2,467    2,467              

Other income (loss)

  169    (25  194    236    (42

Interest and related charges

  832    (57  889    60    829  

Income tax expense

  2,057    1,461    596    (357  953  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (155  (181  26    (164  190  

An analysis of Dominion’s results of operations follows:

2010VS. 2009

Net Revenue increased 8%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $1.1 billion increase from electric utility operations, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The absence of a charge for the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings ($570 million);

Ÿ

The impact of Riders C1 and C2, R, S and T ($279 million);

Ÿ

An increase in sales to retail customers primarily due to an increase in cooling degree days ($248 million); and

Ÿ

An increase in ancillary revenues received from PJM ($78 million), primarily reflecting an increase in the scheduled dispatch of gas and oil-fired generation units to meet higher demand; partially offset by

Ÿ

A decrease primarily due to the impact of unfavorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($75 million);

Ÿ

A $98 million increase from regulated natural gas distribution operations primarily reflecting increased rider revenue associated with the recovery of bad debt expense ($60 million) and an increase in base rates ($40 million); and

Ÿ

A $46 million increase related to natural gas transmission operations largely due to the completion of the Cove Point expansion project.

These increases were partially offset by:

Ÿ

A $356 million decrease from merchant generation operations due to a decrease at certain nuclear generating facilities ($237 million) primarily due to lower realized prices, a decline in margins at certain fossil generation facilities ($70 million)

37


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

primarily due to an increase in fuel prices and the expiration of certain requirements-based power sales contracts in December 2009 ($49 million);

Ÿ

A $222 million decrease reflecting the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations in April 2010; and

Ÿ

A $40 million decrease in producer services primarily related to unfavorable price changes on economic hedging positions and lower physical margins, all associated with natural gas aggregation, marketing and trading activities.

Other operations and maintenance increased $12 million primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $240 million net increase in salaries, wages and benefits primarily related to a workforce reduction program. As a result of the program, Dominion expects to avoid future annualized operations and maintenance expenses of approximately $100 million that would have otherwise been incurred;

Ÿ

Impairment charges related to certain merchant generating facilities ($194 million);

Ÿ

A $103 million increase due to the absence of a benefit in 2009 from a downward revision in the nuclear decommissioning ARO for a unit that is no longer in service;

Ÿ

A $56 million increase in bad debt expense at regulated natural gas distribution operations, primarily related to low income assistance programs ($60 million). These expenses are recovered through rates and do not impact net income; and

Ÿ

A $42 million increase in certain electric transmission-related expenditures.

These increases were partially offset by:

Ÿ

A $434 million decrease in ceiling test impairment charges related to the carrying value of Dominion’s E&P properties;

Ÿ

The absence of a $142 million write-off of previously deferred RTO costs in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings; and

Ÿ

A $48 million decrease in outage costs due to a decrease in scheduled outage days primarily at certain merchant generation facilities.

DD&Adecreased 7%, primarily due to the sale of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations ($45 million) and lower amortization due to decreased cost of emissions allowances consumed ($37 million).

Other taxesincreased 10%, primarily due to additional property tax from increased investments and higher rates ($16 million), an increase in gross receipts tax due to new non-regulated retail energy customers ($14 million) and higher payroll taxes associated with a workforce reduction program ($12 million).

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operationsreflects a gain on the sale of these operations, as described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other incomedecreased 13%, primarily reflecting an increase in charitable contributions ($46 million) and a decrease in interest income ($15 million); partially offset by the absence of an impairment loss on an equity method investment ($30 million) and higher realized gains (including investment income) on nuclear decommissioning trust funds ($12 million).

Interest and related charges decreased 6%, primarily due to a benefit resulting from the net effect of the discontinuance of hedge accounting for certain interest rate hedges and subsequent changes in fair value of these interest rate derivatives ($73 million), partially offset by an increase in interest expense associated with the June 2009 hybrid issuance ($26 million).

Income tax expense increased $1.5 billion, primarily reflecting higher federal and state taxes largely due to the gain on the sale of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P business.

Loss from discontinued operationsprimarily reflects a loss on the sale of Peoples.

2009VS. 2008

Net Revenue decreased 5%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $614 million decrease in net revenue from electric utility operations primarily due to a charge for the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings;

Ÿ

An $86 million decrease in sales of gas production from E&P operations primarily reflecting the expiration of VPP royalty interests; and

Ÿ

A $21 million decrease in net gas revenue from retail energy marketing operations primarily due to lower prices ($39 million), partially offset by higher volumes ($18 million).

These decreases were partially offset by:

Ÿ

A $161 million increase from merchant generation operations, primarily reflecting lower fuel expenses due to the impact of lower commodity prices ($190 million) and higher sales volumes primarily from fewer scheduled nuclear refueling outages and higher demand for natural gas generation ($143 million), partially offset by lower sales prices ($79 million) and increased fuel consumption ($93 million) at certain fossil generation facilities;

Ÿ

A $158 million increase related to gas transmission operations largely due to the completion of the Cove Point expansion project; and

Ÿ

A $70 million increase in net electric revenue from retail energy marketing operations primarily attributable to higher volumes ($36 million) and the acquisition of a retail energy marketing business in September 2008 ($34 million).

Other operations and maintenance expense increased 13%, primarily reflecting the combined effects of:

Ÿ

A $455 million ceiling test impairment charge related to the carrying value of E&P properties due to declines in natural gas and oil prices;

Ÿ

A $142 million write-off of previously deferred RTO costs in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings; and

Ÿ

A $74 million increase in salaries, wages and benefits largely due to higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs.

These increases were partially offset by:

Ÿ

A $103 million downward revision in the nuclear decommissioning ARO for a power station unit that is no longer in service;

Ÿ

The absence of a $59 million charge related to the impairment of a DCI investment sold in 2008; and

Ÿ

A $29 million decrease largely due to the deferral of electric transmission-related expenditures collectible under certain rate adjustment clauses.

38


DD&A increased 10%, principally due to higher depreciation from property additions ($100 million) and higher amortization due to increased consumption of emissions allowances ($37 million), partially offset by decreased DD&A reflecting lower gas and oil production ($19 million) and a decrease in DD&A rates ($28 million) at Dominion’s E&P properties.

Other income (loss) increased $236 million primarily due to the impact of net realized gains (including investment income) on merchant nuclear decommissioning trust funds in 2009 as compared to net realized losses (net of investment income) in 2008.

Interest and related chargesincreased 7%, primarily due to the impact of additional borrowings ($34 million) and the absence of a $23 million benefit related to the redemption of Virginia Power’s Callable and Puttable Enhanced Securities in 2008.

Income tax expense decreased by 37%, primarily reflecting lower pre-tax income in 2009.

Outlook

In order to deliver favorable returns to investors, Dominion’s strategy is to continue focusing on its regulated businesses while maintaining upside potential in well-positioned nonregulated businesses. The goals of this strategy are to provide earnings per share growth, a growing dividend and a stable credit profile. Dominion’s 2010 results were positively impacted by the gain on the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations. In 2011, Dominion’s operating businesses will likely experience a decrease in net income on a per share basis as compared to 2010. Dominion’s anticipated 2011 results reflect the following significant factors:

Ÿ

Lower realized margins from its merchant generation operations due to lower commodity prices and an increase in planned outages at certain nuclear and fossil facilities;

Ÿ

A return to normal weather in its electric utility operations; and

Ÿ

The absence of earnings from Appalachian E&P operations sold in April 2010; partially offset by

Ÿ

Growth in electric sales resulting from the recovering economy;

Ÿ

A benefit from rate adjustment clause revenue associated with Bear Garden and Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center;

Ÿ

A reduction in certain operations and maintenance expenses resulting largely from the implementation of cost-containment measures, including the workforce reduction program discussed in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and

Ÿ

Lower outage costs at certain electric utility generating facilities.

Dominion also expects the bonus depreciation provisions of the tax legislation recently enacted by the U.S. Congress in 2010, discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to reduce income taxes otherwise payable by $1.2 billion to $2.1 billion during 2011 through 2013. The acceleration of these tax deductions is expected to reduce the domestic production activities income tax deduction through 2012 and will also increase deferred taxes, thereby reducing rate base for regulated operations. However, Dominion plans to partially mitigate the earnings per share impact of these items by using the cash tax savings to

repurchase common stock in 2011 and reduce the amount of debt that would have otherwise been issued over the next three years. In addition, Dominion does not plan any market issuances of common stock in 2011 or 2012.

Dominion expects its operating businesses to provide five percent to six percent growth in net income on a per share basis in 2012 as compared to 2011 primarily due to its assumptions regarding construction and operation of new infrastructure in its utility operations, fewer merchant outages and an anticipated rise in commodity prices and energy demand.

SEGMENT RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

Segment results include the impact of intersegment revenues and expenses, which may result in intersegment profit or loss. Presented below is a summary of contributions by Dominion’s operating segments to net income attributable to Dominion:

Year Ended

December 31,

 

2010

  

2009

  

2008

 
   

Net

Income

attribut-
able
to
Dominion

  

Diluted

EPS

  

Net

Income
(loss)

attribut-
able
to
Dominion

  

Diluted

EPS

  

Net

Income
(loss)

attribut-
able
to
Dominion

  Diluted
EPS
 
(millions, except EPS)                

DVP

 $448   $0.76   $384   $0.65   $380   $0.65  

Dominion Generation

  1,291    2.19    1,281    2.16    1,227    2.11  

Dominion Energy

  475    0.80    517    0.87    470    0.81  

Primary operating segments

  2,214    3.75    2,182    3.68    2,077    3.57  

Corporate and Other

  594    1.01    (895  (1.51  (243  (0.41

Consolidated

 $2,808   $4.76   $1,287   $2.17   $1,834   $3.16  

DVP

Presented below are operating statistics related to DVP’s operations:

Year Ended December 31,  2010  % Change  2009  % Change  2008 

Electricity delivered (million MWh)

   84.5    4  81.4    (3)%   84.0  

Degree days:

      

Cooling(1)

   2,090    42    1,477    (9  1,621  

Heating(2)

   3,819    2    3,747    9    3,426  

Average electric distribution customer accounts (thousands)(3)

   2,422    1    2,404    1    2,386  

Average retail energy marketing customer accounts (thousands)(3)

   2,037    19    1,718    7    1,601  

(1)Cooling degree days are units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is greater than 65 degrees, and are calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day.
(2)Heating degree days are units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is less than 65 degrees, and are calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day.
(3)Thirteen-month average.

39


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting DVP’s net income contribution:

2010VS. 2009

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Regulated electric sales:

   

Weather

  $48   $0.08  

FERC transmission revenue

   40    0.07  

Other

   (4  (0.01

Depreciation and amortization

   (15  (0.03

Storm damage and service restoration-distribution operations(1)

   (11  (0.02

Other

   6    0.01  

Share accretion

       0.01  

Change in net income contribution

  $64   $0.11  

(1)Reflects an increase in storm damage and service restoration costs associated with electric distribution operations resulting from more severe weather during 2010.

2009VS. 2008

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Regulated electric sales:

   

FERC transmission revenue

  $28   $0.05  

Customer growth

   5    0.01  

Other(1)

   (14  (0.02

Storm damage and service restoration-distribution operations(2)

   5    0.01  

Depreciation and amortization

   (7  (0.01

Other

   (13  (0.03

Share dilution

       (0.01

Change in net income contribution

  $4   $  

(1)Primarily reflects the impact of unfavorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors.
(2)Reflects a decrease in storm damage and service restoration costs associated with electric distribution operations resulting from less severe weather during 2009.

Dominion Generation

Presented below are operating statistics related to Dominion Generation’s operations:

Year Ended December 31, 2010  % Change  2009  % Change  2008 

Electricity supplied (million MWh):

     

Utility

  84.5    4%    81.4    (3)%    84.0  

Merchant

  47.3    (1)     48.0    6        45.3  

Degree days (electric utility service area):

     

Cooling

  2,090    42      1,477    (9)      1,621  

Heating

  3,819    2      3,747    9       3,426  

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Generation’s net income contribution:

2010VS. 2009

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Regulated electric sales:

   

Weather

  $104   $0.18  

Rate adjustment clause revenue

   95    0.16  

Other

   (23  (0.04

Outage costs

   29    0.05  

Other O&M expenses(1)

   32    0.05  

PJM ancillary services

   27    0.05  

Merchant generation margin

   (209  (0.36

Income and other taxes(2)

   (44  (0.08

Other

   (1    

Share accretion

       0.02  

Change in net income contribution

  $10   $0.03  

(1)Reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program.
(2)Reflects the absence of 2009 investment tax credits related to Fowler Ridge and a decrease in the domestic production activities deduction, primarily due to the absence of a 2009 benefit from the remeasurement of tax uncertainties related to this deduction, as well as the 2010 impact of bonus depreciation on this deduction.

2009VS. 2008

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Merchant generation margin

  $95   $0.16  

Outage costs

   7    0.01  

Regulated electric sales:

   

Customer growth

   10    0.02  

Rate adjustment clause revenue(1)

   53    0.09  

Other(2)

   (59  (0.10

Depreciation and amortization

   (42  (0.07

Sales of emissions allowances

   (18  (0.03

Other

   8    0.01  

Share dilution

       (0.04

Change in net income contribution

  $54   $0.05  

(1)Reflects the incremental impact of Rider S.
(2)Primarily reflects lower sales to wholesale customers, as well as the impact of unfavorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors.

Dominion Energy

Presented below are selected operating statistics related to Dominion Energy’s operations. As discussed in Note 4, in April 2010 Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations. As a result, production-related operating statistics for the Dominion Energy segment are no longer significant.

Year Ended December 31, 2010  % Change  2009  % Change  2008 

Gas distribution throughput (bcf):

     

Sales

  31    (28)%    43    (31)%    62  

Transportation

  241    16       208    (8)       225  

Heating degree days

  5,682    (3)       5,847    (4)       6,065  

Average gas distribution customer accounts (thousands)(1):

     

Sales

  260    (19)      321    (36)      503  

Transportation

  1,042    5       988    21       814  

(1)Thirteen-month average.

40


Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Energy’s net income contribution:

2010VS. 2009

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

E&P disposed operations

  $(61 $(0.11

Producer services

   (27  (0.05

Gas distribution margin:

   

AMR and PIR revenue(1)

   11    0.02  

Base gas sale(2)

   10    0.02  

Weather

   (2  —    

Other

   15    0.03  

Cove Point expansion revenue

   20    0.03  

Other

   (8  (0.02

Share accretion

   —      0.01  

Change in net income contribution

  $(42 $(0.07

(1)Primarily reflects an allowed return on investment through the AMR and PIR programs.
(2)Reflects East Ohio’s sale of 3 bcf of base gas in December 2010 as the Company determined that it could operate its storage system and meet existing and anticipated contractual commitments with less base gas.

2009VS. 2008

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Cove Point expansion revenue

  $88   $0.15  

DD&A-gas and oil

   28    0.04  

Producer services

   10    0.02  

Gas and oil-production(1)

   (63  (0.11

Change in state tax legislation(2)

   (16  (0.02

Share dilution

   —      (0.02

Change in net income contribution

  $47   $0.06  

(1)Primarily reflects a decrease in volumes associated with VPP royalty interests that expired in February 2009.
(2)Reflects the absence of a 2008 benefit resulting from the reduction of deferred tax liabilities related to the enactment of West Virginia income tax rate reductions.

Corporate and Other

Presented below are the Corporate and Other segment’s after-tax results:

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009  2008 
(millions, except EPS amounts)          

Specific items attributable to operating segments

  $1,014   $(688 $(134

Specific items attributable to Corporate and Other segment:

    

Peoples discontinued operations

   (155  26    192  

Other

   (22  7    (61

Total specific items

   837    (655  (3

Other corporate operations

   (243  (240  (240

Total net benefit (expense)

  $594   $(895 $(243

EPS impact

  $1.01   $(1.51 $(0.41

TOTAL SPECIFIC ITEMS

Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s primary operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments. See Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of these items.

VIRGINIA POWER

RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of Virginia Power’s consolidated results:

Year Ended December 31,  2010   $ Change   2009   $ Change  2008 
(millions)                   

Net Income

  $852    $496    $356    $(508 $864  
                         

Overview

2010VS. 2009

Net income increased by 139%, primarily reflecting the absence of a charge in connection with the settlement of the 2009 base rate case proceedings, favorable weather and a benefit from rate adjustment clauses, partially offset by charges related to a workforce reduction program.

2009VS. 2008

Net income decreased 59%, primarily due to a charge in connection with the settlement of the 2009 base rate case proceedings and an increase in outage costs related to scheduled outages at certain nuclear and fossil generating facilities.

Analysis of Consolidated Operations

Presented below are selected amounts related to Virginia Power’sDominion’s results of operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010   $ Change 2009   $ Change 2008  2012 $ Change 2011 $ Change 2010 
(millions)                           

Operating Revenue

  $7,219    $635   $6,584    $(350 $6,934   $13,093   $(1,052 $14,145   $(782 $14,927  

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   2,495     (477  2,972     265    2,707    3,748    (349  4,097    63    4,034  

Purchased electric capacity

   449     40    409     (1  410    387    (67  454    1    453  

Purchased gas

  1,177    (587  1,764    (285  2,049  

Net Revenue

   4,275     1,072    3,203     (614  3,817    7,781    (49  7,830    (561  8,391  

Other operations and maintenance

   1,745     122    1,623     218    1,405    4,868    1,546    3,322    (126  3,448  

Depreciation and amortization

   671     30    641     33    608  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  1,186    120    1,066    31    1,035  

Other taxes

   218     27    191     8    183    571    23    548    24    524  

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations

              (2,467  2,467  

Other income

   100     (4  104     52    52    223    45    178    8    170  

Interest and related charges

   347     (2  349     40    309    882    15    867    41    826  

Income tax expense

   542     395    147     (353  500    146    (608  754    (1,358  2,112  
                

Loss from discontinued operations

  (22  3    (25  233    (258

An analysis of Dominion’s results of operations follows:

2012VS. 2011

Net Revenue decreased 1%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $161 million decrease from merchant generation operations, primarily reflecting a decrease in realized prices; and

Ÿ

A $144 million decrease from regulated natural gas distribution operations primarily reflecting decreased rider revenue ($117 million) related to low income assistance programs.

These decreases were partially offset by:

Ÿ

A $184 million increase from electric utility operations, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($138 million);

Ÿ

The absence of a charge recorded in 2011 based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million); and

Ÿ

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($31 million); partially offset by

Ÿ

The impact ($58 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in cooling and heating degree days ($184 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($126 million);

Ÿ

A $57 million increase in retail energy marketing activities primarily due to price risk management activities; and

Ÿ

A $6 million increase from regulated natural gas transmission operations, primarily due to new transportation assets placed in service.

 

 

41

35

 


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

An analysis of Virginia Power’s results ofOther operations follows:

2010VS. 2009

Net Revenueand maintenance increased 33%47%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The absence of a charge for the settlement of the 2009 base rate case proceedings ($570 million);

Ÿ

The impact of Riders C1 and C2, R, S and T ($279 million);

Ÿ

An increase in sales to retail customers primarily due to an increase in cooling degree days ($248 million); and

Ÿ

An increase in ancillary revenues received from PJM ($78 million), primarily reflecting an increase in the scheduled dispatch of gas and oil-fired generation units to meet higher demand.

These increases were partially offset by:

Ÿ 

A decrease primarily$1.6 billion impairment charge due to the impact of unfavorable economic conditions on customer usagebids received for Brayton Point and other factors ($75 million).

Other operations and maintenance increased 8%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $177 million net increase in salaries, wages and benefits primarily due to a workforce reduction program. As a result of the program, Virginia Power expects to avoid future annualized operations and maintenance expenses of approximately $50 million that would have otherwise been incurred;Kincaid;

Ÿ 

A $42$415 million increaseimpairment charge due to management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in certain electric transmission-related expenditures;2013; and

Ÿ 

A $19$107 million increase in storm damagesalaries, wages and service restoration costs.benefits.

These increases were partially offset by:

Ÿ 

The absence of a $130an impairment charge recorded in 2011 related to certain utility coal-fired generating units ($228 million);

Ÿ

A $117 million write-offdecrease in bad debt expense at regulated natural gas distribution operations primarily related to low income assistance programs. These expenses are recovered through rates and do not impact net income; and

Ÿ

The absence of previously deferred RTOrestoration costs recorded in connection2011 associated with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings.damages caused by Hurricane Irene ($96 million).

Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased 5%11%, primarily due to property additions.

Other taxesIncome increased 14%25%, primarily reflecting additional property tax due to increased investments and higher rates ($12 million), incremental use tax that is recoverable through a customer surcharge ($8 million) and higher payroll taxes associated with a workforce reduction program ($7 million).realized gains (including investment income) on nuclear decommissioning trust funds.

Income tax expense increased $395 million,decreased 81%, primarily reflecting higher pretaxlower pre-tax income in 2010.2012.

20092011VS. 20082010

Net Revenue decreased 16%, primarily due to a charge for the settlement of the 2009 base rate case proceedings.

Other operations and maintenance expense increased 16%7%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ 

A $130$504 million write-off of previously deferred RTO costsdecrease from merchant generation operations, primarily due to a decrease in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings;realized prices ($340 million) and lower generation ($153 million); and

Ÿ 

A $64 million increase in outage costs related to scheduled outages at certain nuclear and fossil generating facilities;

Ÿ

A $43 million increase resulting from higher salaries, wages and benefits largely due to higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs, and other general and administrative costs; and

Ÿ

A $28$125 million decrease in gains fromreflecting the sale of emissions allowances.substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations in April 2010.

These increasesdecreases were partially offset by:

Ÿ 

A $29$32 million increase from Dominion’s gas transmission business primarily related to an increase in revenue from NGLs;

Ÿ

A $28 million increase in producer services primarily related to higher physical margins and favorable price changes on economic hedging positions, all associated with natural gas aggregation, marketing and trading activities;

Ÿ

A $13 million increase from electric utility operations, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($169 million); and

Ÿ

A decrease largelyin net capacity expenses ($44 million); partially offset by

Ÿ

The impact ($120 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in heating and cooling degree days ($220 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the deferraleffect of transmission-related expenditures collectible under certain rate adjustment clauses.favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($100 million); and

Ÿ

A decrease due to a charge based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million).

DepreciationOther operations and amortization expensemaintenance increased 5%,decreased 4% primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $434 million decrease in salaries, wages and benefits primarily related to a 2010 workforce reduction program; partially offset by

Ÿ

A $228 million impairment charge related to certain utility coal-fired generating units; and

Ÿ

A $96 million increase due to restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations reflects a gain on the sale of these operations, as described in Note 3 to property additions.

Other income increased by $52 million primarily due to an increase in the equity component of AFUDC as a result of construction and expansion projects.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest and related charges increased 13%5%, primarily due to the absence of a $23 million benefit related torecorded in 2010 resulting from the redemptiondiscontinuance of Virginia Power’s Callablehedge accounting for certain interest rate derivatives ($73 million) and Puttable Enhanced Securitiesan increase in 2008, anddebt issuances in 2011 ($18 million), partially offset by the recognition of hedging gains that had previously been deferred as regulatory liabilities as a $17 million impact largely due toresult of the impact from additional borrowings.Biennial Review Order ($50 million).

Income tax expense decreased 71%64%, primarily reflecting lower pre-tax incomefederal and state taxes largely due to the absence of a gain from the sale of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations recorded in 2009.2010.

Loss from discontinued operations reflects the sale of Peoples in 2010, as well as losses associated with State Line and Salem Harbor, which were reclassified to discontinued operations as a result of their sale in 2012.

Outlook

Virginia Power expectsDominion’s strategy is to continue focusing on its regulated businesses while maintaining upside potential in well-positioned nonregulated businesses. The goals of this strategy are to provide earnings per share growth, a growing dividend and to maintain a stable credit profile. Dominion is in the process of transitioning to a more regulated earnings mix, and is targeting 80-90 percent of its earnings to come from regulated businesses in 2013 and beyond. This is evidenced by Dominion’s capital investments in regulated infrastructure, as well as its disposition of certain merchant generation facilities during 2012 and its announcement that certain other merchant generation facilities are expected to be sold or decommissioned in 2013.

In 2013, Dominion is expected to experience an increase in net income in 2011. Virginia Power’son a per share basis as compared to 2012. Dominion’s anticipated 20112013 results reflect the following significant factors:

Ÿ 

GrowthThe absence of impairment charges incurred in electric sales resulting from the recovering economy;

Ÿ

A benefit from rate adjustment clause revenue2012 associated with Bear Garden and Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center;

Ÿ

A reduction in certain operations and maintenance expenses resulting largely from the implementation of cost-containment measures, including the workforce reduction program discussed in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and

Ÿ

Lower outage costs at certainmerchant generating facilities; partially offset by

Ÿ 

A return to normal weather in its electric utility operations.operations;

Ÿ

Construction and operation of growth projects in electric utility operations and associated rate adjustment clause revenue, as well as full-year earnings from gas transmission and gas distribution projects placed in service in 2012; and

Ÿ

Growth in weather-normalized electric utility sales of approximately 2% resulting from the recovering economy and rising energy demand; partially offset by

Ÿ

An increase in interest expense;

Ÿ

Increases in certain operations and maintenance expense; and

Ÿ

An increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization.

Virginia Power alsoOn January 2, 2013, U.S. federal legislation was enacted that provides an extension of the 50 percent bonus depreciation allowance for qualifying capital expenditures incurred through 2013, as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Dominion expects the bonus depreciation provisions of the tax legislation recently enacted by the U.S. Congress in 2010, discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to reduce income taxes otherwise payable, by $600resulting in cash savings in 2013 and 2014 of approximately $250 million to $1.2 billion during 2011 through 2013. The acceleration of these tax deductions is expected to reduceand $350 million, respectively.

36


SEGMENT RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

Segment results include the domestic production activities income tax deduction through 2012 and will also increase deferred taxes, thereby reducing the regulated rate base. However, Virginia Power plans to partially mitigate the earnings impact of these itemsintersegment revenues and expenses, which may result in intersegment profit or loss. Presented below is a summary of contributions by usingDominion’s operating segments to net income attributable to Dominion:

Year Ended December 31, 2012  2011  2010 
   

Net

Income
attributable
to
Dominion

  Diluted
EPS
  

Net

Income
attributable
to
Dominion

  Diluted
EPS
  

Net

Income
attributable
to
Dominion

  Diluted
EPS
 
(millions, except EPS)                  

DVP

 $559   $0.98   $501   $0.87   $448   $0.76  

Dominion Generation

  874    1.52    968    1.68    1,263    2.14  

Dominion Energy

  551    0.96    521    0.91    475    0.80  

Primary operating segments

  1,984    3.46    1,990    3.46    2,186    3.70  

Corporate and Other

  (1,682  (2.93  (582  (1.01  622    1.06  

Consolidated

 $302   $0.53   $1,408   $2.45   $2,808   $4.76  

DVP

Presented below are operating statistics related to DVP’s operations:

Year Ended December 31,  2012  % Change  2011  % Change  2010 

Electricity delivered (million MWh)

   80.8    (2)%   82.3    (3)%   84.5  

Degree days:

      

Cooling

   1,787    (6  1,899    (9  2,090  

Heating

   2,955    (12  3,354    (12  3,819  

Average electric distribution customer accounts (thousands)(1)

   2,455    1    2,438    1    2,422  

Average retail energy marketing customer accounts (thousands)(1)

   2,129    (1  2,152    6    2,037  

(1)Thirteen-month average.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the cash tax savingskey factors impacting DVP’s net income contribution:

2012VS. 2011

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Regulated electric sales:

   

Weather

  $(34 $(0.06

Other

   28    0.05  

FERC transmission equity return

   19    0.04  

Retail energy marketing operations

   35    0.06  

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

   14    0.03  

Other

   (4  (0.01

Change in net income contribution

  $58   $0.11  

(1)Excludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms in 2012 and 2011, which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.

2011VS. 2010

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Regulated electric sales:

   

Weather

  $(43 $(0.07

Other

   10    0.02  

FERC transmission equity return

   44    0.07  

Retail energy marketing operations

   6    0.01  

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

   9    0.02  

Other operations and maintenance expense(2)

   28    0.04  

Other

   (1    

Share accretion

       0.02  

Change in net income contribution

  $53   $0.11  

(1)Excludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.
(2)Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.

Dominion Generation

Presented below are operating statistics related to reduceDominion Generation’s operations:

Year Ended December 31,  2012   % Change  2011   % Change  2010 

Electricity supplied (million MWh):

        

Utility

   80.8     (2)%   82.3     (3)%   84.5  

Merchant(1)

   41.4     (4  43.0     (9  47.3  

Degree days (electric utility service area):

        

Cooling

   1,787     (6  1,899     (9  2,090  

Heating

   2,955     (12  3,354     (12  3,819  

(1)Includes 13.2, 17.3, and 22.7 million MWh for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, related to Kewaunee, State Line, Salem Harbor, Brayton Point, Kincaid, and Dominion’s 50% interest in Elwood.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the amountkey factors impacting Dominion Generation’s net income contribution:

2012VS. 2011

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Merchant generation margin

  $(109 $(0.19

Regulated electric sales:

   

Weather

   (78  (0.14

Other

   46    0.08  

Brayton Point, Kincaid and Elwood third and fourth quarter 2011 earnings(1)

   7    0.01  

Rate adjustment clause equity return

   17    0.03  

PJM ancillary services

   (27  (0.05

Net capacity expenses

   19    0.04  

Outage costs

   8    0.01  

Other

   23    0.05  

Change in net income contribution

  $(94 $(0.16

(1)Brayton Point’s, Kincaid’s and Elwood’s third and fourth quarter 2012 results of operations have been reflected in the Corporate and Other segment due to Dominion’s decision, in the third quarter of 2012, to pursue the sale of Brayton Point, Kincaid, and its 50% interest in Elwood.

37


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of debt that would have otherwise been issued over the next three years.Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

2011VS. 2010

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Merchant generation margin

  $(278 $(0.48

Regulated electric sales:

   

Weather

   (91  (0.16

Other

   59    0.10  

Rate adjustment clause equity return

   30    0.05  

Outage costs

   (11  (0.01

Other operations and maintenance expenses(1)

   72    0.13  

Depreciation and amortization

   (7  (0.01

Interest expense

   (18  (0.03

Kewaunee 2010 earnings(2)

   (19  (0.03

Other

   (32  (0.06

Share accretion

       0.04  

Change in net income contribution

  $(295 $(0.46

(1)Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.
(2)Kewaunee’s 2011 results of operations have been reflected in the Corporate and Other segment due to Dominion’s decision, in the first quarter of 2011, to pursue a sale of the power station. In 2012, Dominion decided to cease operations and begin decommissioning the facility in 2013.

Dominion Energy

Presented below are selected operating statistics related to Dominion Energy’s operations. As discussed in Note 3, in April 2010 Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations. As a result, production-related operating statistics for the Dominion Energy segment are no longer significant.

Year Ended December 31,  2012   % Change  2011   % Change  2010 

Gas distribution throughput (bcf):

        

Sales

   26     (13)%   30     (3)%   31  

Transportation

   259     2    253     5    241  

Heating degree days

   4,986��    (11  5,584     (2  5,682  

Average gas distribution customer accounts (thousands)(1):

        

Sales

   251     (2  256     (2  260  

Transportation

   1,044         1,040         1,042  

(1)Thirteen-month average.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Energy’s net income contribution:

2012VS. 2011

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Weather

  $(5 $(0.01

Producer services margin

   (13  (0.02

Gas transmission margin(1)

   8    0.01  

Gain from sale of assets to Blue Racer

   43    0.08  

Other

   (3  (0.01

Change in net income contribution

  $30   $0.05  

(1)Primarily reflects placing the Appalachian Gateway Project into service.

2011VS. 2010

    Increase (Decrease) 
    Amount  EPS 
(millions, except EPS)       

Producer services margin

  $18   $0.03  

Gas transmission margin(1)

   15    0.03  

Other operations and maintenance expenses(2)

   11    0.02  

Gas distribution margin:

   

AMR and PIR revenue

   9    0.02  

Base gas sales

   (4  (0.01

E&P disposed operations

   (17  (0.03

Other

   14    0.02  

Share accretion

       0.03  

Change in net income contribution

  $46   $0.11  

(1)Primarily reflects an increase in revenue from NGLs.
(2)Primarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a workforce reduction program, and lower salaries and wages expenses.

Corporate and Other

Presented below are the Corporate and Other segment’s after-tax results:

Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions, except EPS amounts)          

Specific items attributable to operating segments

  $(1,442 $(340 $1,042  

Specific items attributable to Corporate and Other segment:

    

Peoples discontinued operations

           (155

Other

   (5  29    (22

Total specific items

   (1,447  (311  865  

Other corporate operations

   (235  (271  (243

Total net benefit (expense)

  $(1,682 $(582 $622  

EPS impact

  $(2.93 $(1.01 $1.06  

TOTAL SPECIFIC ITEMS

Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s primary operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments. See Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of these items.

VIRGINIA POWER

RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of Virginia Power’s consolidated results:

Year Ended December 31,  2012   $ Change   2011   $ Change  2010 
(millions)                   

Net Income

  $1,050    $228    $822    $(30 $852  

Overview

2012VS. 2011

Net income increased by 28%. Favorable drivers include the absence of an impairment charge related to certain coal-fired

38


power stations recorded in 2011, the impact of rate adjustment clauses, and the absence of restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene recorded in 2011. Unfavorable drivers include the impact of less favorable weather and the restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms.

2011VS. 2010

Net income decreased by 4%, primarily reflecting less favorable weather, including Hurricane Irene, and an impairment charge related to certain coal-fired power stations, partially offset by higher earnings from rate adjustment clauses and the absence of charges related to a workforce reduction program.

Analysis of Consolidated Operations

Presented below are selected amounts related to Virginia Power’s results of operations:

Year Ended December 31,  2012   $ Change  2011   $ Change  2010 
(millions)                  

Operating Revenue

  $7,226    $(20)  $7,246    $27   $7,219  

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   2,368     (138)   2,506     11    2,495  

Purchased electric capacity

   386     (66)   452     3    449  

Net Revenue

   4,472     184    4,288     13    4,275  

Other operations and maintenance

   1,466     (277)   1,743     (2  1,745  

Depreciation and amortization

   782     64    718     47    671  

Other taxes

   232     10    222     4    218  

Other income

   96     8    88     (12  100  

Interest and related charges

   385     54    331     (16  347  

Income tax expense

   653     113    540     (2  542  

An analysis of Virginia Power’s results of operations follows:

2012VS. 2011

Net Revenue increased 4%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($138 million);

Ÿ

The absence of a charge recorded in 2011 based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million); and

Ÿ

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($31 million); partially offset by

Ÿ

The impact ($58 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in cooling and heating degree days ($184 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($126 million).

Other operations and maintenance decreased 16%, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The absence of an impairment charge recorded in 2011 related to certain coal-fired generating units ($228 million); and

Ÿ

The absence of restoration costs recorded in 2011 associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene ($96 million); partially offset by

Ÿ

A $64 million increase in storm damage and service restoration costs primarily due to the damage caused by severe storms in 2012.

Interest and related charges increased 16%, primarily due to the absence of the recognition of hedging gains into income in 2011, that had been deferred as regulatory liabilities, as a result of the Biennial Review Order.

Income tax expense increased 21%, primarily reflecting higher pre-tax income in 2012.

2011VS. 2010

Net Revenue increased $13 million, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

The impact of rate adjustment clauses ($169 million); and

Ÿ

A decrease in net capacity expenses ($44 million); partially offset by

Ÿ

The impact ($120 million) of a decrease in sales to retail customers, primarily due to a decrease in heating and cooling degree days ($220 million), partially offset by an increase in sales due to the effect of favorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors ($100 million); and

Ÿ

A decrease due to a charge based on the Biennial Review Order to refund revenues to customers ($81 million).

Other operations and maintenance decreased $2 million, primarily reflecting:

Ÿ

A $267 million decrease in salaries, wages and benefits as well as certain administrative and general costs primarily due to a 2010 workforce reduction program; and

Ÿ

A $54 million decrease in planned outage costs primarily due to fewer scheduled outage days at certain generation facilities; partially offset by

Ÿ

A $228 million impairment charge related to certain coal-fired generating units; and

Ÿ

A $96 million increase due to restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene.

Other income decreased 12%, primarily due to a decrease in the equity component of AFUDC ($17 million), partially offset by an increase in amounts collectible from customers for taxes in connection with contributions in aid of construction ($5 million).

Outlook

Virginia Power expects to provide growth in net income in 2013. Virginia Power’s anticipated 2013 results reflect the following significant factors:

Ÿ

A return to normal weather;

Ÿ

Growth in weather-normalized electric sales of approximately 2% resulting from the recovering economy and rising energy demand; and

Ÿ

Construction and operation of growth projects and associated rate adjustment clause revenue; partially offset by

Ÿ

Increases in certain operations and maintenance expense; and

Ÿ

An increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization.

On January 2, 2013, U.S. federal legislation was enacted that provides an extension of the 50 percent bonus depreciation allowance for qualifying capital expenditures incurred through

2013, as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial

39


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

Statements. Virginia Power expects the bonus depreciation provisions to reduce income taxes otherwise payable, resulting in cash savings in 2013 and 2014 of approximately $200 million and $250 million, respectively.

SEGMENT RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

Presented below is a summary of contributions by Virginia Power’s operating segments to net income:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010  $ Change   2009  $ Change  2008 
(millions)                 

DVP

  $377   $64    $313   $6   $307  

Dominion Generation

   630    155     475    (108  583  

Primary operating segments

   1,007    219     788    (102  890  

Corporate and Other

   (155  277     (432  (406  (26

Consolidated

  $852   $496    $356   $(508 $864  

42


Year Ended
December 31,
  2012  $ Change  2011  $ Change  2010 
(millions)                

DVP

  $448   $22   $426   $49   $377  

Dominion Generation

   653    (11  664    34    630  

Primary operating segments

   1,101    11    1,090    83    1,007  

Corporate and Other

   (51  217    (268  (113  (155

Consolidated

  $1,050   $228   $822   $(30 $852  

DVP

Presented below are operating statistics related to Virginia Power’s DVP segment:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010   % Change   2009   % Change 2008   2012   % Change 2011   % Change 2010 

Electricity delivered (million MWh)

   84.5     4%     81.4     (3)%   84.0     80.8     (2)%   82.3     (3)%   84.5  

Degree days (electric service area):

                 

Cooling(1)

   2,090     42       1,477     (9  1,621     1,787     (6  1,899     (9  2,090  

Heating(2)

   3,819     2       3,747     9    3,426     2,955     (12  3,354     (12  3,819  

Average electric distribution customer accounts (thousands)(3)(1)

   2,422     1       2,404     1    2,386     2,455     1    2,438     1    2,422  
              

 

(1)Cooling degree days are units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is greater than 65 degrees, and are calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day.
(2)Heating degree days are units measuring the extent to which the average daily temperature is less than 65 degrees, and are calculated as the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature for that day.
(3)Thirteen-month average.

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting DVP’s net income contribution:

20102012VS. 20092011

 

  Increase (Decrease)   Increase (Decrease) 
(millions, except EPS)        

Regulated electric sales:

    

Weather

  $48    $(34

FERC transmission revenue

   40  

Other

   (4   28  

Depreciation and amortization

   (15

Storm damage and service restoration—distribution operations(1)

   (11

FERC transmission equity return

   19  

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

   14  

Other

   6     (5

Change in net income contribution

  $64    $22  

 

(1)Reflects an increase in storm damage and serviceExcludes restoration costs associated with electric distribution operations resulting from moredamage caused by severe weather during 2010.storms in 2012 and 2011, which are reflected in the Corporate and Other segment.

20092011VS. 20082010

 

    Increase (Decrease) 
(millions)    

Regulated electric sales:

  

FERC transmission revenue

  $28  

Customer growth

   5  

Other(1)

   (14

Storm damage and service restoration—distribution operations(2)

   5  

Depreciation and amortization

   (7

Other

   (11

Change in net income contribution

  $6  
    Increase (Decrease) 
(millions)    

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

  $(43

Other

   10  

FERC transmission equity return

   44  

Storm damage and service restoration(1)

   9  

Other operations and maintenance expense(2)

   28  

Other

   1  

Change in net income contribution

  $49  

 

(1)Primarily reflectsExcludes restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene which are reflected in the impact of unfavorable economic conditions on customer usageCorporate and other factors.Other segment.
(2)ReflectsPrimarily reflects the 2010 implementation of cost containment measures including a decrease in storm damageworkforce reduction program, and service restoration costs associated with electric distribution operations resulting from less severe weather during 2009.lower salaries and wages expenses.

Dominion Generation

Presented below are operating statistics related to Virginia Power’s Dominion Generation segment:

 

Year Ended December 31, 2010 % Change 2009 % Change 2008   2012   % Change 2011   % Change 2010 

Electricity supplied

(million MWh)

  84.5    4%    81.4    (3)%    84.0     80.8     (2)%   82.3     (3)%   84.5  

Degree days (electric

service area):

             

Cooling

  2,090    42      1,477    (9)      1,621     1,787     (6  1,899     (9  2,090  

Heating

  3,819    2      3,747    9       3,426     2,955     (12  3,354     (12  3,819  
           

Presented below, on an after-tax basis, are the key factors impacting Dominion Generation’s net income contribution:

20102012VS. 20092011

 

    Increase (Decrease) 
(millions)    

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

  $104  

Rate adjustment clause revenue

   95  

Other

   (23

PJM ancillary services

   27  

Income and other taxes(1)

   (24

Energy supply margin(2)

   (13

Other

   (11

Change in net income contribution

  $155  

(1)Reflects a decrease in the domestic production activities deduction, primarily due to the absence of a 2009 benefit from the remeasurement of tax uncertainties related to this deduction, as well as the 2010 impact of bonus depreciation on this deduction.
(2)Primarily reflects a reduced benefit from FTRs, due to the crediting of certain FTRs allocated to Virginia Power against Virginia jurisdictional fuel factor expenses subject to deferral accounting beginning July 1, 2009.
    Increase (Decrease) 
(millions)    

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

  $(78

Other

   46  

Rate adjustment clause equity return

   17  

PJM ancillary services

   (27

Net capacity expenses

   19  

Other

   12  

Change in net income contribution

  $(11

20092011VS. 20082010

 

    Increase (Decrease) 
(millions)    

Outage costs

  $(36

PJM ancillary services

   (21

Sale of emissions allowances

   (17

Interest expense

   (15

Depreciation expense

   (13

Regulated electric sales:

  

Customer growth

   10  

Rate adjustment clause revenue(1)

   53  

Other(2)

   (59

Other

   (10

Change in net income contribution

  $(108
    Increase (Decrease) 
(millions)    

Regulated electric sales:

  

Weather

  $(91

Other

   59  

Rate adjustment clause equity return

   30  

Outage costs

   33  

Other

   3  

Change in net income contribution

  $34  

 

(1)40Reflects the incremental impact of Rider S.
(2)Primarily reflects lower sales to wholesale customers, as well as the impact of unfavorable economic conditions on customer usage and other factors.


Corporate and Other

Presented below are the Corporate and Other segment’s after-tax results.results:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009  2008 
(millions)          

Specific items attributable to operating segments

  $(153 $(430 $(23

Other corporate operations

   (2  (2  (3

Total net expense

  $(155 $(432 $(26

43


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Specific items attributable to operating segments

  $(51 $(268 $(153

Other corporate operations

           (2

Total net expense

  $(51 $(268 $(155

SPECIFIC ITEMS ATTRIBUTABLETO OPERATING SEGMENTS

Corporate and Other primarily includes specific items attributable to Virginia Power’s primary operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments. See Note 2725 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of these items.

SELECTED INFORMATION—ENERGY TRADING ACTIVITIES

Dominion engages in energy trading, marketing and hedging activities to complement its businesses and facilitate its price risk management activities. As part of these operations, Dominion enters into contracts for purchases and sales of energy-related commodities, including electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products. Settlements of contracts may require physical delivery of the underlying commodity or cash settlement. Dominion also enters into contracts with the objective of benefiting from changes in prices. For example, after entering into a contract to purchase a commodity, Dominion typically enters into a sales contract, or a combination of sales contracts, with quantities and delivery or settlement terms that are identical or very similar to those of the purchase contract. When the purchase and sales contracts are settled either by physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by net cash settlement, Dominion may receive a net cash margin (a realized gain), or may pay a net cash margin (a realized loss). Dominion continually monitors its contract positions, considering location and timing of delivery or settlement for each energy commodity in relation to market price activity.

A summary of the changes in the unrealized gains and losses recognized for Dominion’s energy-related derivative instruments held for trading purposes follows:

    Amount 
(millions)    

Net unrealized gain at December 31, 2011

  $20  

Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period

   3  

Change in unrealized gains and losses

   55  

Net unrealized gain at December 31, 2012

  $78  

The balance of net unrealized gains and losses recognized for Dominion’s energy-related derivative instruments held for trading purposes at December 31, 2012, is summarized in the following table based on the approach used to determine fair value:

    Maturity Based on Contract Settlement or Delivery Date(s) 
Sources of Fair Value  2013   2014—2015  2016—2017  2018
and
thereafter
   Total 
(millions)                  

Prices actively quoted—Level 1(1)

  $    $   $   $    $  

Prices provided by other external sources—Level 2(2)

   59     26    2         87  

Prices based on models and other valuation methods—Level 3(3)

   1     (6  (4       (9

Total

  $60    $20   $(2 $    $78  

(1)Values represent observable unadjusted quoted prices for traded instruments in active markets.
(2)Values with inputs that are observable directly or indirectly for the instrument, but do not qualify for Level 1.
(3)Values with a significant amount of inputs that are not observable for the instrument.

 

 

LIQUIDITYAND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Dominion and Virginia Power depend on both internal and external sources of liquidity to provide working capital and as a bridge to fund capital requirements.long-term debt financings. Short-term cash requirements not met by cash provided by operations are generally satisfied with proceeds from short-term borrowings. Long-term cash needs are met through issuances of debt and/or equity securities.

At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had $2$1.1 billion of unused capacity under its credit facilities, including $559$256 million of unused capacity under joint credit facilities available to Virginia Power. See additional discussion underCredit Facilities and Short-Term Debt.

The disposition of certain merchant generation facilities during 2012 and the expected sale or decommissioning of certain other merchant generation facilities in 2013 are not expected to negatively impact Dominion’s liquidity.

A summary of Dominion’s cash flows is presented below:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010 
(millions)                

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  $50   $71   $287    $102   $62   $50  

Cash flows provided by (used in):

        

Operating activities

   1,825    3,786    2,676     4,137    2,983    1,825  

Investing activities

   419    (3,695  (3,490   (3,840  (3,321  419  

Financing activities

   (2,232  (112  598     (151  378    (2,232

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   12    (21  (216

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

   146    40    12  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year(1)

  $62   $50   $71    $248   $102   $62  

 

(1)2009 and 2008 amounts include $2 million and $5 million, respectively, of cash classified as held for sale in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

41


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

A summary of Virginia Power’s cash flows is presented below:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010 
(millions)                

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  $19   $27   $49    $29   $5   $19  

Cash flows provided by (used in):

        

Operating activities

   1,409    1,970    1,235     2,706    2,024    1,409  

Investing activities

   (2,425  (2,568  (2,003   (2,282  (1,947  (2,425

Financing activities

   1,002    590    746     (425  (53  1,002  

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (14  (8  (22

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (1  24    (14

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $5   $19   $27    $28   $29   $5  

Operating Cash Flows

In 2010,2012, net cash provided by Dominion’s operating activities decreasedincreased by approximately $2$1.2 billion, primarily due to lowerhigher deferred fuel and gas cost recoveries contributionsin its Virginia jurisdiction, lower margin collateral requirements, changes in other working capital items and income tax refunds in 2012 as compared to Dominion’s pension plans, the absence of disposed Appalachian E&P operations,income tax payments in 2011. The increase was partially offset by lower merchant generation margins and refunds related to the 2009 Virginia Power base rate case settlement, partially offset

by lower income tax payments, lower margin collateral requirements and the favorable impact of weather and rate adjustment clauses on electric utility operations.less favorable weather.

In 2010,2012, net cash provided by Virginia Power’s operating activities decreasedincreased by $561$682 million, primarily due to lowerhigher deferred fuel cost recoveries in its Virginia jurisdiction refunds related to the 2009 Virginia base rate case settlement, and contributions to Dominion’s pension plans;net changes in other working capital items, partially offset by the favorable impact of weather and rate adjustment clauses, and cash received for income tax benefitspayments in 2010,2012 as compared to income taxes paidtax refunds in 2009.

Dominion’s lower income tax payments2011 and Virginia Power’s realizationthe impact of income tax benefits in 2010 resulted in part from the bonus depreciation provisions of the tax legislation recently enacted by the U.S. Congress, discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.less favorable weather.

Dominion believes that its operations provide a stable source of cash flow to contribute to planned levels of capital expenditures and maintain or grow the dividend on common shares. In 2011,2012, Dominion’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors adopted a new dividend policy that raised its target payout ratio. The Boardratio to 65-70%, and established an annual dividend rate for 2013 of $1.97$2.25 per share of common stock, a 7.7%6.6% increase over the 20102012 rate. QuarterlyDeclarations of dividends are subject to declaration by the Board.further Board of Directors approval. Virginia Power believes that its operations provide a stable source of cash flow to contribute to planned levels of capital expenditures and provide dividends to Dominion.

The Companies’ operations are subject to risks and uncertainties that may negatively impact the timing or amounts of operating cash flows, and which are discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

CREDIT RISK

Dominion’s exposure to potential concentrations of credit risk results primarily from its energy marketing and price risk management activities. Presented below is a summary of Dominion’s credit exposure as of December 31, 20102012 for these activities. Gross credit exposure for each counterparty is calculated as outstanding receivables plus any unrealized onon- or off-balance sheet exposure, taking into account contractual netting rights.

 

  Gross
Credit
Exposure
   Credit
Collateral
   Net
Credit
Exposure
  Gross
Credit
Exposure
 Credit
Collateral
 Net
Credit
Exposure
 
(millions)                   

Investment grade(1)

  $426    $26    $400   $281   $   $281  

Non-investment grade(2)

   10     3     7    4        4  

No external ratings:

         

Internally rated-investment grade(3)

   102          102    113        113  

Internally rated-non-investment grade(4)

   82          82    114        114  

Total

  $620    $29    $591   $512   $   $512  

 

(1)Designations as investment grade are based upon minimum credit ratings assigned by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. The five largest counterparty exposures, combined, for this category represented approximately 33%28% of the total net credit exposure.
(2)The five largest counterparty exposures, combined, for this category represented approximately 1% of the total net credit exposure.
(3)The five largest counterparty exposures, combined, for this category represented approximately 11%13% of the total net credit exposure.
(4)The five largest counterparty exposures, combined, for this category represented approximately 8%15% of the total net credit exposure.

44


Virginia Power’s exposure to potential concentrations of credit risk results primarily from sales to wholesale customers and iswas not considered material at December 31, 2010.2012.

Investing Cash Flows

In 2010, net cash provided by Dominion’s investing activities was $419 million as compared to2012, net cash used in Dominion’s investing activities of $3.7 billion in 2009. This change isincreased by $519 million, primarily due to higher capital expenditures, mainly related to investments in growth projects, and lower restricted cash reimbursements for the purpose of funding certain qualifying construction projects, partially offset by proceeds received from the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operationsassets, primarily related to Blue Racer, in April 2010 and the sale of Peoples in February 2010. While taxes and other costs of the sales are reflected in cash flow from operations, the gross proceeds from the sales are reported in cash flow from investing activities.2012.

In 2010,2012, net cash used in Virginia Power’s investing activities decreasedincreased by $143$335 million, primarily due to lowerhigher capital expenditures partially offset by an increase inand lower restricted cash equivalents designated to financereimbursements for the purpose of funding certain qualifying facilities.construction projects.

Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity

Dominion and Virginia Power rely on capital markets as significant sources of funding for capital requirements not satisfied by cash provided by their operations. As discussed inCredit Ratings,, the Companies’ ability to borrow funds or issue securities and the return demanded by investors are affected by credit ratings. In addition, the raising of external capital is subject to certain regulatory requirements, including registration with the SEC for certain issuances and, in the case of Virginia Power, approval by the Virginia Commission.

Each of the Companies currently meets the definition of a well-known seasoned issuer under SEC rules governing the registration, communications and offering processes under the Securities Act of 1933. The rules provide for a streamlined shelf registration process to provide registrants with timely access to capital. This allows the Companies to use automatic shelf registrationregistra-

42


tion statements to register any offering of securities, other than those for exchange offers or business combination transactions.

In 2010,2012, net cash used in Dominion’s financing activities increased by $2.1 billion, primarily due to net debt repayments in 2010was $151 million as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $378 million in 2011, primarily reflecting lower net debt issuances in 2009, and net2012 as compared to 2011 as a result of higher cash flow from operations, partially offset by the absence of the repurchases of common stock recorded in 2010 as compared to issuances of common stock in 2009. This reflects the use of proceeds from the sales of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations and Peoples.2011.

In 2010,2012, net cash provided byused in Virginia Power’s financing activities increased by $412$372 million, primarily due to higherreflecting lower net debt issuances in 20102012 as compared to 2009,2011 as a result of lowerhigher cash flow from operations.

CREDIT FACILITIESAND SHORT-TERM DEBT

Dominion and Virginia Power use short-term debt to fund working capital requirements and as a bridge to long-term debt financings. The levels of borrowing may vary significantly during the course of the year, depending upon the timing and amount of cash requirements not satisfied by cash from operations. In addition, Dominion utilizes cash and letters of credit to fund collateral requirements. Collateral requirements are impacted by commodity prices, hedging levels, Dominion’s credit ratings and the credit quality of its counterparties. Dominion and Virginia Power replaced certain of their existing credit facilities in September 2010, as noted below.

In connection with commodity hedging activities, the Companies are required to provide collateral to counterparties under some circumstances. Under certain collateral arrangements, the Companies may satisfy these requirements by electing to either deposit cash, post letters of credit or, in some cases, utilize other forms of security. From time to time, the Companies vary the form of collateral provided to counterparties after weighing the costs and benefits of various factors associated with the different forms of collateral. These factors include short-term borrowing and short-term investment rates, the spread over these short-term rates at which the Companies can issue commercial paper, balance sheet impacts, the costs and fees of alternative collateral postings with these and other counterparties and overall liquidity management objectives.

DOMINIONDominion

Commercial paper and letters of credit outstanding, as well as capacity available under credit facilities, were as follows:

 

At December 31, 2010  Facility
Limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $3,000    $1,386   $101    $1,513  

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(2)

   500         35     465  

Total

  $3,500    $1,386(3)  $136    $1,978  
December 31, 2012  Facility
Limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

Joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $3,000    $2,412   $    $588  

Joint revolving credit facility(2)

   500         26     474  

Total

  $3,500    $2,412(3)  $26    $1,062  

 

(1)This credit facilityEffective September 2012, the maturity date was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings and the issuance of commercial paper, as well as to support up to $1.5 billion of letters of credit.
(2)ThisEffective September 2012, the maturity date for $400 million of the $500 million in committed capacity of this credit facility was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. The remaining $100 million continues to have a maturity date of September 2016. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings, commercial paper and letter of credit issuances.
(3)The weighted-average interest rate of the outstanding commercial paper supported by Dominion’s credit facilities was 0.41%0.49% at December 31, 2010.2012.

VIRGINIA POWERVirginia Power

Virginia Power’s short-term financing is supported by two three-year joint revolving credit facilities with Dominion. These credit facilities are being used for working capital, as support for the combined commercial paper programs of Dominion and Virginia Power and for other general corporate purposes.

Virginia Power’s share of commercial paper and letters of credit outstanding, as well as its capacity available under its joint credit facilities with Dominion, were as follows:

 

At December 31, 2010  Facility
Sub-limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $1,000    $600   $91    $309  

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(2)

   250              250  

Total

  $1,250    $600(3)  $91    $559  
December 31, 2012  Facility
Sub-limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Sub-limit
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

Joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $1,000    $992   $    $8  

Joint revolving credit facility(2)

   250         2     248  

Total

  $1,250    $992(3)  $2    $256  

 

(1)This credit facilityEffective September 2012, the maturity date was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings and the issuance of commercial paper, as well as to support up to $1.5 billion (or the sub-limit, whichever is less) of letters of credit. Virginia Power’s current sub-limit under this credit facility can be increased or decreased multiple times per year.

45


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

(2)ThisEffective September 2012, the maturity date for $400 million of the $500 million in committed capacity of this credit facility was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. The remaining $100 million continues to have a maturity date of September 2016. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings, commercial paper and letter of credit issuances. Virginia Power’s current sub-limit under this credit facility can be increased or decreased multiple times per year.
(3)The weighted-average interest rate of the outstanding commercial paper supported by these credit facilities was 0.41%0.47% at December 31, 2010.2012.

In addition to the credit facility commitments mentioned above, Virginia Power also has a three-year $120 million credit facility thatfacility. Effective September 2012, the maturity date was entered into inextended from September 2010. The2016 to September 2017. This facility which terminates in September 2013, supports certain tax-exempt financings of Virginia Power.

SHORT-TERM NOTES

In November and December 2012, Dominion issued $250 million and $150 million, respectively, of private placement short-term notes that mature in November 2013 and bear interest at a variable rate. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.

LONG-T-ERMTERM DEBT

During 2010,2012, Dominion and Virginia Power issued the following long-term debt:

 

Type  Principal   Rate Maturity   Issuing
Company
   Principal   Rate Maturity   

Issuing

Company

 
  (millions)             (millions)           

Senior notes

  $250     2.25  2015     Dominion    $350     1.40  2017     Dominion  

Senior notes

   300     3.45  2022     Virginia Power     350     2.75  2022     Dominion  

Senior notes

   350     4.05  2042     Dominion  

Senior notes

   450     2.95  2022     Virginia Power  

Total notes issued

  $550          $1,500        

In November 2010,December 2011, Virginia Power borrowed $105$75 million in connection with the IndustrialEconomic Development Authority of Wisethe County Solid Wasteof Chesterfield Pollution Control Refunding Revenue

43


Management’s Discussion and Sewage Disposal Revenue Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

Bonds, Series 20102011 A, which mature in 20402017 and bear interest during the initial period at a couponvariable rate of 2.375% for the first five years, after which they will bear interest at a market rate to be determined at that time, using a remarketing process. The proceeds will bewere used to finance certain qualifying facilities atrefund the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center.

In December 2010 and September 2009, Virginia Power borrowed $100 million and $60 million, respectively, in connection with the $160 million Industrial Development Authorityprincipal amount of Wise County Solid Waste and Sewage Disposal Revenue Bonds, Series 2009 A, which mature in 2040 and bear interest during the initial period at a variable rate. Due to unfavorable market conditions, Virginia Power acquired the bonds upon issuance with the intention of remarketing them to third parties at a later time. The proceeds will be used to finance certain qualifying facilities at the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center. At December 31, 2010, these bonds had not been remarketed and thus are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In December 2010, Virginia Power borrowed $100 million in connection with the Industrial Development Authority of Halifaxthe County of Chesterfield, Virginia Recovery Zone FacilityMoney Market MunicipalsTM Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 2010 A, which mature in 2041 and bear interest at a variable rate for the first seven years, after which they will bear interest at a market rate to be determined at that time, using a remarketing process. The proceeds will be used to finance certain qualifying facilities in Halifax County and/or Wise County.

In December 2010, Brayton Point borrowed approximately $160 million and approximately $75 million in connection with the Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Recovery Zone Facility Bonds, Series 20101987 A and the Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Series 20101987 B respectively, which maturethat would otherwise have matured in 2041 and bear interest during the initial period at a variable rate. Due to unfavorable market conditions, Dominion acquired the bonds upon issuance in December 2010 with the intention of remarketing them to third parties at a later time. The proceeds

will be used to finance certain qualifying facilities at Brayton Point. At December 31, 2010, these bonds had not been remarketed and thus are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.June 2017.

During 2010,2012, Dominion and Virginia Power repaid and repurchased $1.5$1.7 billion and $347$641 million, respectively, of long-term debt and notes payable.debt.

ISSUANCEOF COMMON STOCK

Dominion maintains Dominion Direct® and a number of employee savings plans through which contributions may be invested in Dominion’s common stock. These shares may either be newly issued or purchased on the open market with proceeds contributed to these plans. In January 2012, Dominion began issuing new common shares for these direct stock purchase plans.

During 2010,2012, Dominion issued 2.3approximately 6.4 million shares of common stock forthrough various programs. Dominion received cash proceeds of $74 million. The$265 million from the issuance of 5.3 million of such shares issued and cash proceeds received during 2010 were through Dominion Direct,®, employee savings plans, and the exercise of employee stock options.

In January 2012, Dominion doesfiled a new SEC shelf registration for the sale of debt and equity securities including the ability to sell common stock through an at the market program. Dominion entered into four separate Sales Agency Agreements to effect sales under the program. However, with the exception of issuing approximately $318 million in equity through employee savings plans, direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plans, converted securities and other employee and director benefit plans, Dominion did not currently plan any market issuances ofissue common stock in 2011 or 2012.

In February 2010, Dominion began purchasing its common stock on the open market with proceeds received through Dominion Direct® and employee savings plans, rather than issuing additional new common shares.

In 2010,2012, Virginia Power issued 33,013did not issue any shares of its common stock to Dominion for approximately $1 billion. The proceeds were used to pay down short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion.

REPURCHASE OFOF COMMON STOCK

In March 2010, Dominion began repurchasing commondid not repurchase any shares in anticipation of proceeds from the sale of its Appalachian E&P operations. During 2010, Dominion purchased 21.4 million shares of its common stock for approximately $900 million.

On January 28, 2011, Dominion announced that it intends2012 and does not plan to repurchase between $400 million and $700 million of commonshares during 2013, except for shares tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock, with cash tax savings resulting from the extension of the bonus depreciation allowance discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In the first quarter of 2011, Dominion began repurchasing shares on the open market under this program.which do not count against its stock repurchase authorization.

BORROWINGS FROM PARENT

Virginia Power has the ability to borrow funds from Dominion under both short-term and long-term borrowing arrangements andarrangements. Virginia Power’s short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion were $243 million at December 31, 2010, its2012. There were no long-term borrowings from Dominion at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2012, Virginia Power’s nonregulated subsidiaries had outstanding borrowings, net of repayments, under the Dominion money pool of $24$192 million. Virginia Power’s short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion were $79 million at December 31, 2010. There were no long-term borrowings from Dominion at December 31, 2010.

Credit Ratings

Credit ratings are intended to provide banks and capital market participants with a framework for comparing the credit quality of securities and are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Dominion and Virginia Power believe that their current

credit ratings provide sufficient access to the capital markets. However, disruptions in the banking and capital markets not specifically related to Dominion and Virginia Power may affect their ability to access these funding sources or cause an increase in the return required by investors. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s credit ratings may affect their liquidity, cost of borrowing under credit facilities and collateral posting requirements under commodity contracts, as well as the rates at which they are able to offer their debt securities.

46


Both quantitative (financial strength) and qualitative (business or operating characteristics) factors are considered by the credit rating agencies in establishing an individual company’s credit rating. Credit ratings should be evaluated independently and are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization. The credit ratings for Dominion and Virginia Power are most affected by each company’s financial profile, mix of regulated and nonregulated businesses and respective cash flows, changes in methodologies used by the rating agencies and event risk, if applicable, such as major acquisitions or dispositions.

In January 2010, Fitch lowered its credit ratings for Virginia Power’s preferred stock and Dominion’s junior subordinated debt securities and enhanced junior subordinated notes solely due to a revision in Fitch’s ratings methodology such that it now rates these securities two notches below its credit rating for senior unsecured debt securities. In December 2010, Moody’s raised its credit ratings for Virginia Power, reflecting sustained improvements in Virginia Power’s financial performance as measured by its credit metrics and the agency’s views of a generally supportive regulatory and political environment in Virginia Power’s service territory.

Credit ratings as of February 23, 201122, 2013 follow:

 

    Fitch   Moody’s   

Standard

& Poor’s

 

Dominion

      

Senior unsecured debt securities

   BBB+     Baa2     A-  

Junior subordinated debt securities

   BBB-     Baa3     BBB  

Enhanced junior subordinated notes

   BBB-     Baa3     BBB  

Commercial paper

   F2     P-2     A-2  

Virginia Power

      

Mortgage bonds

   A     A1     A  

Senior unsecured (including tax-exempt) debt securities

   A-     A3     A-  

Junior subordinated debt securities

   BBB     Baa1     BBB  

Preferred stock

   BBB     Baa2     BBB  

Commercial paper

   F2     P-2     A-2  

As of February 23, 2011,22, 2013, Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s maintained a stable outlook for their respective ratings of Dominion and Virginia Power.

A downgrade in an individual company’s credit rating would not necessarily restrict its ability to raise short-term and long-term financing as long as its credit rating remains investment grade, but it would likely increase the cost of borrowing. Dominion and Virginia Power work closely with Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s with the objective of maintaining their current credit ratings. In order to maintain current ratings, theThe Companies may find it necessary to modify their business plans to maintain or achieve appropriate credit ratings and such changes may adversely affect growth and EPS.

Debt Covenants

As part of borrowing funds and issuing debt (both short-term and long-term) or preferred securities, Dominion and Virginia Power must enter into enabling agreements. These agreements contain covenants that, in the event of default, could result in the acceleration of principal and interest payments; restrictions on distributions related to capital stock, including dividends, redemptions, repurchases, liquidation payments or guarantee payments; and in some cases, the termination of credit commitments unless a waiver of such requirements is agreed to by the

lenders/security holders. These provisions are customary, with

44


each agreement specifying which covenants apply. These provisions are not necessarily unique to Dominion and Virginia Power.

Some of the typical covenants include:

Ÿ 

The timely payment of principal and interest;

Ÿ 

Information requirements, including submitting financial reports filed with the SEC and information about changes in Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s credit ratings to lenders;

Ÿ 

Performance obligations, audits/inspections, continuation of the basic nature of business, restrictions on certain matters related to merger or consolidation, and restrictions on disposition of all or substantially all assets;

Ÿ 

Compliance with collateral minimums or requirements related to mortgage bonds; and

Ÿ 

Limitations on liens.

Dominion and Virginia Power are required to pay annual commitment fees to maintain their credit facilities. In addition, their credit agreements contain various terms and conditions that could affect their ability to borrow under these facilities. They include maximum debt to total capital ratios and cross-default provisions.

As of December 31, 2010,2012, the calculated total debt to total capital ratio, pursuant to the terms of the agreements, was as follows:

 

Company  Maximum Allowed Ratio Actual  Ratio(1)   Maximum Allowed Ratio Actual  Ratio(1) 

Dominion

   65  54   65  60

Virginia Power

   65  46   65  46

 

(1)Indebtedness as defined by the bank agreements excludes junior subordinated notes reflected as long-term debt or securities due within one year as well as AOCI reflected as equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

These provisions apply separately to Dominion and Virginia Power.

If Dominion or Virginia Power or any of either company’s material subsidiaries fails to make payment on various debt obligations in excess of $100 million, the lenders could require that company to accelerate its repayment of any outstanding borrowings under the credit facility and the lenders could terminate their commitment to lend funds to that company. Accordingly, any default by Dominion will not affect the lenders’ commitment to Virginia Power. However, any default by Virginia Power would affect the lenders’ commitment to Dominion under the joint credit agreements.

Dominion executed RCCs in connection with its issuance of the following hybrid securities:

Ÿ 

June 2006 hybrids;

Ÿ 

September 2006 hybrids; and

Ÿ 

June 2009 hybrids.

UnderSee Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for terms of the RCCs, Dominion covenants to and for the benefit of designated covered debtholders, as may be designated from time to time, that Dominion shall not redeem, repurchase, or defease all or any part of the hybrids, and shall not cause its majority owned subsidiaries to purchase all or any part of the hybrids, on or before their applicable RCC termination date, unless, subject to certain limitations, during the 180 days prior to such activity, Dominion has received a specified amount of proceeds as set forth in the RCCs from the sale of qualifying securities that have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more equity-like than the applicable characteristics of the hybrids

47


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

at that time, as more fully described in the RCCs. The proceeds Dominion receives from the replacement offering, adjusted by a predetermined factor, must equal or exceed the redemption or repurchase price.

At December 31, 2010,2012, the termination dates and covered debt under the RCCs associated with Dominion’s hybrids arewere as follows:

 

Hybrid  

RCC

Termination

Date

  

Designated Covered Debt

Under RCC

June 2006 hybrids

   6/30/2036   September 2006 hybrids

September 2006 hybrids

   9/30/2036   June 2006 hybrids

June 2009 hybrids

   6/15/2034(1)  
2008 Series B Senior
Notes, 7.0% due 2038

(1)Automatically extended, as set forth in the RCC, for additional quarterly periods, to the extent the maturity date is extended.

Dominion and Virginia Power monitor the debt covenants on a regular basis in order to ensure that events of default will not occur. As of December 31, 2010,2012, there have been no events of default under or changes to Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s debt covenants.

Virginia Power Mortgage Supplement

Substantially all of Virginia Power’s property is subject to the lien of the Indenture of Mortgage securing its First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds. In July 2012, Virginia Power entered into a supplement to the indenture in order to amend various of its terms and conditions and to incorporate certain new provisions. The supplement reduces Virginia Power’s overall compliance responsibilities associated with the indenture by limiting the maximum principal amount of bonds that may be outstanding under the indenture to $10 million unless otherwise provided in a further supplement, and by modifying or eliminating altogether certain compliance requirements while there are no bonds outstanding. The supplement also provides Virginia Power with flexibility to determine when or if certain newly or recently acquired properties will be pledged as collateral under the indenture. There were no bonds outstanding as of December 31, 2012; however, by leaving the indenture open, Virginia Power expects to retain the flexibility to issue mortgage bonds in the future.

Dividend Restrictions

The Virginia Commission may prohibit any public service company, including Virginia Power, from declaring or paying a dividend to an affiliate if found to be detrimental to the public interest. At December 31, 2010,2012, the Virginia Commission had not restricted the payment of dividends by Virginia Power.

Certain agreements associated with Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s credit facilities contain restrictions on the ratio of debt to total capitalization. These limitations did not restrict Dominion or Virginia Power’s ability to pay dividends or receive dividends from their subsidiaries at December 31, 2010.2012.

See Note 1817 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of potential restrictions on dividend payments by Dominion in connection with the deferral of interest payments on junior subordinated notes.notes, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Future Cash Payments for Contractual Obligations and Planned Capital Expenditures

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Dominion and Virginia Power are party to numerous contracts and arrangements obligating them to make cash payments in future years. These contracts include financing arrangements such as debt agreements and leases, as well as contracts for the purchase of goods and services and financial derivatives. Presented below is a table summarizing cash payments that may result from contracts to which Dominion and Virginia Power are parties as of December 31, 2010.2012. For purchase obligations and other liabilities, amounts are based upon contract terms, including fixed and minimum quantities to be purchased at fixed or market-based prices. Actual cash payments will be based upon actual quantities purchased and prices paid and will likely differ from amounts

45


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

presented below. The table excludes all amounts classified as current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, other than current maturities of long-term debt, interest payable and certain derivative instruments. The majority of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s current liabilities will be paid in cash in 2011.2013.

Dominion 2011  2012-
2013
  2014-
2015
  2016 and
thereafter
  Total 
(millions)               

Long-term debt(1)

 $497   $2,184   $1,666   $11,882   $16,229  

Interest payments(2)

  932    1,786    1,592    12,996    17,306  

Leases(3)

  184    312    108    193    797  

Purchase obligations(4):

     

Purchased electric capacity for utility operations

  342    698    696    779    2,515  

Fuel commitments for utility operations

  959    932    491    241    2,623  

Fuel commitments for nonregulated operations

  446    264    198    162    1,070  

Pipeline transportation and storage

  134    142    49    64    389  

Energy commodity purchases for resale(5)

  495    57    10    76    638  

Other(6)

  253    54    12    12    331  

Other long-term liabilities(7):

     

Financial derivative-commodities(5)

  28    49    12    2    91  

Other contractual obligations(8)

  5    10    11    1    27  

Total cash payments

 $4,275   $6,488   $4,845   $26,408   $42,016  

Dominion 2013  2014-
2015
  2016-
2017
  2018 and
thereafter
  Total 
(millions)               

Long-term debt(1)

 $2,200   $2,058   $2,790   $11,940   $18,988  

Interest payments(2)

  898    1,693    1,457    12,218    16,266  

Leases(3)

  79    136    118    161    494  

Purchase obligations(4):

     

Purchased electric capacity for utility operations

  350    695    456    327    1,828  

Fuel commitments for utility operations

  716    778    265    259    2,018  

Fuel commitments for nonregulated operations

  254    258    116    187    815  

Pipeline transportation and storage

  131    174    96    366    767  

Energy commodity purchases for resale(5)

  79    32    29    146    286  

Other(6)

  469    56    7    21    553  

Other long-term liabilities(7):

     

Financial derivative-commodities(5)

  48    29    3        80  

Other contractual obligations(8)

  16    12    30    2    60  

Total cash payments

 $5,240   $5,921   $5,367   $25,627   $42,155  

(1)Based on stated maturity dates rather than the earlier redemption dates that could be elected by instrument holders.
(2)Includes interest payments over the terms of the debt. Interest is calculated using the applicable interest rate or forward interest rate curve at December 31, 2012 and outstanding principal for each instrument with the terms ending at each instrument’s stated maturity. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Does not reflect Dominion’s ability to defer interest payments on junior subordinated notes.
(3)Primarily consists of operating leases.
(4)Amounts exclude open purchase orders for services that are provided on demand, the timing of which cannot be determined.
(5)Represents the summation of settlement amounts, by contracts, due from Dominion if all physical or financial transactions among its counterparties and Dominion were liquidated and terminated.
(6)Includes capital, operations, and maintenance commitments.
(7)Excludes regulatory liabilities, AROs and employee benefit plan obligations, which are not contractually fixed as to timing and amount. See Notes 13, 1512, 14 and 2221 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to uncertainty about the timing and amounts that will ultimately be paid, $253$233 million of income taxes payable associated with unrecognized tax benefits are excluded. Deferred income taxes are also excluded since cash payments are based primarily on taxable income for each discrete fiscal year. See Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(8)Includes interest rate swap agreements.
Virginia Power 2013  2014-
2015
  2016-
2017
  2018 and
thereafter
  Total 
(millions)               

Long-term debt(1)

 $418   $228   $1,155   $4,875   $6,676  

Interest payments(2)

  342    660    594    3,869    5,465  

Leases(3)

  26    43    26    26    121  

Purchase obligations(4):

     

Purchased electric capacity for utility operations

  350    695    456    327    1,828  

Fuel commitments for utility operations

  716    778    265    259    2,018  

Transportation and storage

  27    52    40    197    316  

Other(5)

  302    29    4    12    347  

Total cash payments(6)

 $2,181   $2,485   $2,540   $9,565   $16,771  

 

Virginia Power 2011  2012-
2013
  2014-
2015
  2016 and
thereafter
  Total 
(millions)               

Long-term debt(1)

 $15   $1,034   $236   $5,436   $6,721  

Interest payments

  369    721    653    4,418    6,161  

Leases(2)

  36    45    26    23    130  

Purchase obligations(3):

     

Purchased electric capacity for utility operations

  342    698    696    779    2,515  

Fuel commitments for utility operations

  959    932    491    241    2,623  

Transportation and storage

  19    29    21    32    101  

Other

  113    21    8    8    150  

Total cash payments(4)

 $1,853   $3,480   $2,131   $10,937   $18,401  
(1)Based on stated maturity dates rather than the earlier redemption dates that could be elected by instrument holders.

48


(2)Includes interest payments over the terms of the debt. Interest is calculated using the applicable interest rate or forward interest rate curve at December 31, 2012 and outstanding principal for each instrument with the terms ending at each instrument’s stated maturity. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Primarily consists of operating leases.
(3)(4)Amounts exclude open purchase orders for services that are provided on demand, the timing of which cannot be determined.
(4)(5)Includes capital, operations, and maintenance commitments.
(6)Excludes regulatory liabilities, AROs and employee benefit plan contributions that are not contractually fixed as to timing and amount. See Notes 13, 1512, 14 and 2221 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to uncertainty about the timing and amounts that will ultimately be paid, $113$57 million of income taxes payable associated with unrecognized tax benefits are excluded. Deferred income taxes are also excluded since cash payments are based primarily on taxable income for each discrete fiscal year. See Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

PLANNED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Dominion’s planned capital expenditures are expected to total approximately $3.9 billion, $4.7 billion, $4.2 billion and $4.4$3.3 billion in 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. Dominion’s expenditures are expected to include construction and expansion of electric generation and natural gas transmission and storage facilities, environmental upgrades, construction improvements and expansion of electric transmission and distribution assets, and purchases of nuclear fuel.fuel and the buyout of the lease at Fairless in 2013.

Virginia Power’s planned capital expenditures are expected to total approximately $2.2$2.6 billion, $3.0 billion and $3.3$2.3 billion in 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. Virginia Power’s expenditures are expected to include construction and expansion of electric generation facilities, environmental upgrades, construction improvements and expansion of electric transmission and distribution assets and purchases of nuclear fuel.

Dominion and Virginia Power expect to fund their capital expenditures with cash from operations and a combination of securities issuances and short-term borrowings. Planned capital expenditures include capital projects that are subject to approval by regulators and the respective company’s Board of Directors.

Based on available generation capacity and current estimates of growth in customer demand, Virginia Power will need additional generation in the future. SeeDVP, Dominion Generation-PropertiesGenerationand Dominion Energy-Properties in Item 1. Business for a discussion of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s expansion plans.

These estimates are based on a capital expenditures plan reviewed and endorsed by Dominion’s Board of Directors in late

46


2012 and are subject to continuing review and adjustment and actual capital expenditures may vary from these estimates. The Companies may also choose to postpone or cancel certain planned capital expenditures in order to mitigate the need for future debt financings and equity issuances.

Use of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

GUARANTEES

Dominion primarily enters into guarantee arrangements on behalf of its consolidated subsidiaries. These arrangements are not subject to the provisions of FASB guidance that dictate a guarantor’s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees, including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others.

At December 31, 2010, Dominion had issued $131 million of guarantees, primarily to support equity method investees. No significant amounts related to these guarantees have been recorded. As of December 31, 2010, Dominion’s exposure under these guarantees was $54 million, primarily related to certain reserve requirements associated with non-recourse financing.

LEASING ARRANGEMENT

Dominion leases Fairless in Pennsylvania, which began commercial operations in June 2004. During construction, Dominion

acted as the construction agent for the lessor, controlled the design and construction of the facility and has since been reimbursed for all project costs ($898 million) advancedSee Note 22 to the lessor. Dominion makes annual lease payments of $53 million. The lease expires in 2013 and at that time, Dominion may renew the lease at negotiated amounts based on original project costs and current market conditions, subject to lessor approval; purchase Fairless at its original construction cost plus 51% of any appraised value in excess of original construction cost; or sell Fairless, on behalf of the lessor, to an independent third party. If FairlessConsolidated Financial Statements for additional information, which information is sold and the proceeds from the sale are less than its original construction cost, Dominion would be required to make a payment to the lessor in an amount up to 70.75% of original project costs adjusted for certain other costs as specified in the lease. The lease agreement does not contain any provisions that involve credit rating or stock price trigger events.incorporated herein by reference.

Benefits of this arrangement include:

Ÿ

Certain tax benefits as Dominion is considered the owner of the leased property for tax purposes. As a result, Dominion is entitled to tax deductions for depreciation not recognized for financial accounting purposes; and

Ÿ

As an operating lease for financial accounting purposes, the asset and related borrowings used to finance the construction of the asset are not included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although this improves measures of leverage calculated using amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements, credit rating agencies view lease obligations as debt equivalents in evaluating Dominion’s credit profile.

 

 

FUTURE ISSUESAND OTHER MATTERS

See Item 1. Business, Item 3. Legal Proceedings, and Notes 1413 and 2322 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on various environmental, regulatory, legal and other matters that may impact future results of operations, financial condition, and/or financial condition.cash flows.

Environmental Matters

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to costs resulting from a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect human health and the environment. These laws and regulations affect future planning and existing operations. They can result in increased capital, operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation, containment and monitoring obligations.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAND MONITORING EXPENDITURES

Dominion incurred approximately $228$189 million, $252$184 million and $205$228 million of expenses (including depreciation) during 2010, 2009,2012, 2011, and 20082010 respectively, in connection with environmental protection and monitoring activities and expects these expenses to be approximately $231$193 million and $251$181 million in 20112013 and 2012,2014, respectively. In addition, capital expenditures related to environmental controls were $213 million, $403 million, and $351 million $266 million,for 2012, 2011 and $254 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These expenditures are expected to be approximately $398$75 million and $553$115 million for 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Virginia Power incurred approximately $120 million, $129 million and $144 million of expenses (including depreciation) during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, in connection with environmental protection and monitoring activities and expects these expenses to be approximately $148 million and $157 million in 2013 and 2014, respectively. In addition, capital expenditures related to environmental controls were $34 million, $77 million and $101 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These expenditures are expected to be approximately $20 million and $99 million for 2013 and 2014, respectively.

FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

Air

The CAA is a comprehensive program utilizing a broad range of regulatory tools to protect and preserve the nation’s air quality. At

a minimum, states are required to establish regulatory programs to address all requirements of the CAA. However, states may choose to develop regulatory programs that are more restrictive. Many of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s facilities are subject to the CAA’s permitting and other requirements.

In December 2012, the EPA issued a final rule that set a more stringent annual air quality standard for fine particulate matter. The EPA is expected to complete final air quality designations by December 2014. States will have until 2020 to meet the revised standard. The extent to which a revised particulate matter standard will impact Dominion is uncertain at this time, but is not expected to be material.

The EPA has finalized rules establishing a new 1-hour NAAQS for NO2 and a new 1-hour NAAQS for SO2, which could require additional NOX and SO2 controls in certain areas where the Companies operate. Until the states have developed implementation plans for these standards, the impact on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s facilities that emit NOX and SO2 is uncertain.

In January 2010, the EPA also proposed a new, more stringent NAAQS for ozone and had planned to finalize the rule in 2011. In September 2011, the EPA announced a delay from 2011 to 2014 of the rulemaking, therefore NOx controls that may have been required by the rulemaking are also expected to be delayed. In the interim, the EPA is proceeding with implementation of the current ozone standard and made final attainment/nonattainment designations in May 2012. Several Dominion electric generating facilities are located in areas impacted by this standard. Until the states have developed implementation plans for the new NOx, SO2 and ozone standards, it is not possible to determine the impact on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s facilities that emit NOX and SO2. The Companies cannot currently predict with certainty whether or to what extent the new rules will ultimately require additional controls, however, if significant expenditures are required, it could adversely affect Dominion’s results of operations, and Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s cash flows.

In June 2005, the EPA finalized amendments to the Regional Haze Rule, also known as the Clean Air Visibility Rule. The rule requires the states to implement Best Available Retrofit Technology requirements for sources to address impacts to visual air quality through regional haze state implementation plans, but allows other alternative options. The EPA is in the process of completing rulemakings on regional haze state implementation plans. Although Dominion and Virginia Power anticipate that the emission reductions achieved through compliance with other CAA-required programs will generally address this rule, additional emission reduction requirements may be imposed on the Companies’ facilities.

Water

The CWA is a comprehensive program requiring a broad range of regulatory tools including a permit program to authorize and regulate discharges to surface waters with strong enforcement mechanisms. Dominion and Virginia Power must comply with all aspects of the CWA programs at their operating facilities. In July 2004, the EPA published regulations under CWA Section 316(b) that govern existing utilities that employ a cooling water intake structure and that have flow levels exceeding a minimum threshold. In April 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court granted an industry

 

 

49

47

 


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

 

 

 

request to review the question of whether Section 316(b) authorizes the EPA to compare costs with benefits in determining the best technology available for minimizing “adverse environmental impact” at cooling water intake structures. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in April 2009 that the EPA has the authority to consider costs versus environmental benefits in selecting the best technology available for reducing impacts of cooling water intakes at power stations. It is currently unknown how the EPA will interpret the ruling in its ongoing rulemaking activity addressing cooling water intakes as well as how the states will implement this decision. In April 2011, the EPA published the proposed rule related to Section 316(b) in the Federal Register, and agreed to publish a final rule no later than July 27, 2012. In July 2012, the EPA announced a delay to no later than June 27, 2013 of its impending rulemaking related to Section 316(b).

The rule in its proposed form seeks to establish a uniform national standard for impingement, but forgoes the creation of a single technology standard for entrainment. Instead, the EPA proposes to delegate entrainment technology decisions to state regulators. State regulators are to make case-by-case entrainment technology determinations after an examination of nine facility-specific factors, including a social cost-benefit test.

The proposed rule governs all electric generating stations with water withdrawals above two MGD, with a heightened entrainment analysis for those facilities over 125 MGD. Under this proposal, Dominion has 16 facilities that may be subject to these proposed regulations. If finalized as proposed, Dominion anticipates that it will have to install impingement control technologies at many of these stations that have once-through cooling systems. Dominion and Virginia Power incurred approximately $144 million, $134 millioncannot estimate the need or potential for entrainment controls under the proposed rule as these decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis after a thorough review of detailed biological, technology, cost and $125 millionbenefit studies. However, the impacts of expenses (including depreciation) duringthis proposed rule may be material to the results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.

Solid and Hazardous Waste

In June 2010, the EPA proposed federal regulations under the RCRA for management of coal combustion by-products generated by power plants. The EPA is considering two possible options for the regulation of coal combustion by-products, both of which fall under the RCRA. Under the first proposal, the EPA would classify these by-products as special wastes subject to regulation under subtitle C, the hazardous waste provisions of the RCRA, when destined for disposal at landfills or surface impoundments. Under the second proposal, the EPA would regulate coal combustion by-products under subtitle D of the RCRA, the section for non-hazardous wastes. While the Companies cannot currently predict the outcome of this matter, regulation under either option will affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s onsite disposal facilities and coal combustion by-product management practices, and potentially require material investments.

Climate Change Legislation and Regulation

In December 2009, the EPA issued theirFinal Endangerment and 2008, respectively,Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases underSection 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, finding that GHGs “endanger

both the public health and the public welfare of current and future generations.” On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration announced a joint final rule establishing a program that will dramatically reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in connectionthe United States. These rules took effect in January 2011 and established GHG emissions as regulated pollutants under the CAA.

In May 2010, the EPA issued theFinal Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rulethat, combined with environmental protectionprior actions, require Dominion and monitoring activitiesVirginia Power to obtain permits for GHG emissions for new and expects these expensesmodified facilities over certain size thresholds, and meet best available control technology for GHG emissions. The EPA has issued draft guidance for GHG permitting, including best available control technology.

In April 2012, the EPA published proposed NSPS for GHG emissions for new electric generating units. This proposed rule sets national emission standards for new coal, oil, integrated gasification combined cycle, and combined cycle units larger than 25MW. The rule, which is expected to be approximately $142 millionfinalized in the Spring of 2013, covers CO2 only and $156 million in 2011 and 2012, respectively. In addition, capital expenditures relateddoes not apply to environmental controls were $101 million, $109 million and $116 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These expendituresexisting sources. New natural gas combined cycle units, including Brunswick County, are expected to be approximately $72 million and $341 millionable to meet this standard. The rule also does not apply to any new or existing simple cycle combustion turbine units or biomass units. The schedule for 2011 and 2012, respectively.

FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONSa final rulemaking governing a GHG NSPS for existing sources is uncertain.

There have already been federal and stateare other legislative proposals and regulatory action regarding the regulation ofthat may be considered that would have an indirect impact on GHG emissions. There is the potential for the U.S. Congress to consider a mandatory Clean Energy Standard. In addition to possible federal action, some regions and states in which Dominion and Virginia Power expectoperate have already adopted or may adopt GHG emission reduction programs. Any of these new or contemplated regulations may affect capital costs, or create significant permitting delays, for new or modified facilities that there may be federal legislation and/or regulatory action regarding compliance with more stringent air emission standards, regarding coal combustion by-products, and regarding regulation of cooling water intake structures and discharges inemit GHGs.

In July 2008, Massachusetts passed the future. With respect toGWSA. Among other provisions, the GWSA sets economy-wide GHG emissions reduction goals for Massachusetts, including reductions of 25% below 1990 levels by 2020, interim goals for 2030 and 2040 and reductions of 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. No regulations impacting Dominion under the GWSA have been proposed. Dominion operates Brayton Point in Massachusetts and acts as a retail electric supplier in Massachusetts, which are subject to the implementation of the GWSA.

In December 2010,2009, the EPA announcedgovernors of 11 Northeast and mid-Atlantic states, including Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island (RGGI states plus Pennsylvania) signed a schedule for when they will propose regulations which would establishmemorandum of understanding committing their states toward developing a low carbon fuel standard to reduce GHG performance standards for new, modifiedemissions from vehicles. The memorandum of understanding established a process to develop a regional framework by 2011 and existing fossil-fired electric generating units. Regulations are expectedexamine the economic impacts of a low carbon fuel standard program. Although economic studies and policy options were examined in 2011, a definitive framework has yet to be proposed by July 2011 and finalized by May 2012.This means that Dominion’s new, modified, and existing fossil-fired electric generating units will become subject to GHG performance standards, if these rules are finalized. The EPA has not provided any detail yet on what the performance standard might be or what measures facilities might have to make to reach the standard. With respect to emission reductions of SO2, NOx, mercury and HAPs (in addition to mercury), specific requirements will depend on the following:established.

Ÿ48 

Final outcome of the EPA’s scheduled rulemaking for developing MACT standards for mercury and other HAPs to replace the CAMR vacated by a federal court in 2008;

Ÿ 

The final outcome of the EPA’s Transport Rule proposed in July 2010 in response to a federal court remand of the CAIR as well as future state regulations implementing requirements to address the EPA’s promulgation of revised NAAQS for SO2 and NO2; and

Ÿ

EPA’s impending rulemaking to revise the ozone NAAQS.

With respect to cooling water intakes and discharges, the Companies expect future federal regulation on cooling water intake structures and the quality of water discharges, and more focus by the EPA and state regulatory authorities on thermal discharge issues. With respect to coal combustion by-products, Dominion and Virginia Power expect federal regulation of coal combustion by-product handling and disposal practices. If any of these new proposals are adopted, additional significant expenditures may be required.


Dodd-Frank Act

The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted into law in July 2010 in an effort to improve regulation of financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions that will require certain over-the-counter derivatives, or swaps, to be centrally cleared and executed through an exchange or other approved trading platform. Non-financial entities that use swaps to hedge or mitigate commercial risk, often referred to as end users, can be exemptedchoose to exempt their hedging transactions from these clearing and exchange trading requirements. In addi-

tion, the Dodd-Frank Act allows the CFTC and SEC to impose initial and variation margin requirements on entities who execute swaps. End users were not expressly exempt from these requirements for non-cleared swaps; however, key legislators indicated in a public letter that it was their intention to exclude commercial hedging transactions by end users from these requirements. Final rules for the over-the-counter derivative-related provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act including the clearing, exchange trading and margin requirements, will continue to be established through the CFTC’s and SEC’songoing rulemaking process which is required to be completed by July 2011.of the applicable regulators. If, as a result of the rulemaking process, Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s derivative activities are not exempted from the clearing, exchange trading or margin requirements, the Companies could be subject to higher costs, for their derivative activities, including from higher margin requirements.requirements, for their derivative activities. In addition, implementation of, and compliance with, the over-the-counter derivative provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act by the Companies’ swap counterparties could result in increased costs related to the Companies’ derivative activities. Due to the ongoing rulemaking process, the Companies are currently unable to assess the potential impact of the Dodd-Frank Act’s derivative-related provisions on their financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Cove Point Export Project

Dominion is pursuing a liquefaction project at Cove Point, which would enable the facility to liquefy domestically-produced natural gas and export it as LNG. The project, which is expected to cost between approximately $3.4 billion and $3.8 billion, exclusive of financing costs, has a planned capacity of approximately 750 million cubic feet per day on the inlet and approximately 4.5 to 5 million metric tons per annum on the outlet. In 2011, Cove Point requested authorization from the DOE to export LNG to countries that have a free trade agreement requiring trade in natural gas with the U.S. as well as countries that do not have such a free trade agreement. In October 2011, Cove Point received authorization from the DOE to export LNG to free trade agreement countries and Cove Point expects to receive authorization from the DOE to export LNG to non-free trade agreement countries in 2013. In June 2012, FERC approved Cove Point’s request to initiate the pre-filing process under which environmental review for the project commenced. Approval of the project could take up to two years from the pre-filing approval date.

In March 2012, Cove Point entered into precedent agreements with two major companies, one of which is Sumitomo Corporation, pursuant to which Cove Point would provide liquefaction, storage and loading services but would not own or directly export the LNG. In October 2012, Cove Point and the unnamed company terminated their precedent agreement by mutual consent. In December 2012, Cove Point entered into a 20-year terminal services agreement with Pacific Summit Energy LLC, a U.S. subsidiary of Sumitomo Corporation, for half of the planned project capacity. The agreement contains final terms subject to certain conditions precedent which include conditions related to customer contracting. Cove Point is in active negotiations with a company for a definitive terminal services agreement for the remaining half of the planned project capacity.

In May 2012, in response to claims by the Sierra Club, Cove Point filed a complaint for declaratory judgment to confirm its right to construct the project. In January 2013, a Maryland circuit court issued declaratory judgment confirming Cove Point’s right to build liquefaction facilities. In February 2013, the Sierra Club filed a notice of appeal with the Maryland Court of Special Appeals.

Subject to a final decision on pursuing the project, execution of binding terminal service agreements, receipt of regulatory and other approvals, and successful completion of engineering studies, construction of liquefaction facilities could begin in 2014 with an in-service date in 2017.

Cove Point Re-Export Project

In August 2011, Cove Point filed an application with the DOE seeking blanket authority to re-export up to the equivalent of 150 bcf of foreign-sourced LNG from the Cove Point terminal over a two-year period. In January 2012, the DOE conditionally approved Cove Point’s application. Due to lack of customer interest in re-export, Cove Point made no filings with FERC and the DOE re-export authorization automatically terminated in January 2013.

Regulation Act Legislation

In January 2013, legislation was introduced in the Virginia General Assembly which would amend the Regulation Act. The legislation passed the Virginia House of Delegates and the Senate of Virginia and was signed into law by the governor in February 2013. Among other things the amendments eliminate the 50 basis points RPS ROE incentive prospectively, as well as the new generation ROE incentives for future projects, except for nuclear and offshore wind projects, which instead are reduced from the current 200 basis points ROE incentive to 100 basis points. ROE incentives for previously approved, as well as filed for but unconstructed projects, remain in place. In addition, the performance incentive provision of the Regulation Act, authorizing the Virginia Commission to increase or decrease a utility’s authorized ROE by up to 100 basis points based on operating comparisons with certain nationally recognized standards, is removed and the Virginia Commission has the discretion to increase or decrease a utility’s authorized ROE based on commission precedent that existed prior to the enactment of the Regulation Act. The legislation includes changes to the earnings test parameters defined by the Regulation Act to allow for a wider band of 70 basis points above and below the authorized ROE in determining whether a utility’s earned ROE is either insufficient or excessive beginning with the biennial review for 2013-2014 to be filed in 2015. Additionally, if a utility is deemed to have over-earned, the customer refund share of excess earnings increases to 70% from the current 60% level beginning with the biennial review for 2013-2014 to be filed in 2015. The legislation also provides guidance to the Virginia Commission on rate-making treatment for severe weather events and natural disasters and for asset impairments related to early retirements of utility generation plants, for which the decision to retire was made before December 31, 2012. This guidance on rate-making treatment applies to Virginia Power’s upcoming biennial review for 2011-2012 to be filed in 2013. Additionally, the provision in the Regulation Act requiring the Virginia Commission to combine transmission-related rider costs with base rates is eliminated and the transmission costs will con-

49


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

tinue to be segregated and recovered separately. The legislation requires a utility seeking approval to construct a generating facility to demonstrate that it has considered and weighed alternative options in its selection process.

Virginia Offshore Wind Lease

In March 2012, Virginia Power filed a notice with BOEM of its interest in obtaining leases off the Virginia coast in an area sufficient for construction of offshore wind turbines having the potential to generate approximately 1,500-2,000 MW of electricity or enough electricity to serve approximately 500,000 homes at peak demand. In December 2012, BOEM announced that it would auction approximately 113,000 acres off the Virginia coast as a single lease in 2013.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The matters discussed in this Item may contain “forward-looking statements” as described in the introductory paragraphs of Item 7. MD&A. The reader’s attention is directed to those paragraphs and Item 1A. Risk Factors for discussion of various risks and uncertainties that may impact Dominion and Virginia Power.

 

 

MARKET RISK SENSITIVE INSTRUMENTSAND RISK MANAGEMENT

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s financial instruments, commodity contracts and related financial derivative instruments are exposed to potential losses due to adverse changes in commodity prices, interest rates and equity security prices as described below. Commodity price risk is present in Dominion’s and Virginia Power’sPower��s electric operations, Dominion’s gas procurement operations, and Dominion’s energy marketing and trading operations due to the exposure to market shifts in prices received and paid for electricity, natural gas and other commodities. The Companies use commodity derivative contracts to manage price risk exposures for these operations. Interest rate risk is generally related to their outstanding debt. In addition, they are exposed to investment price risk through various portfolios of equity and debt securities.

The following sensitivity analysis estimates the potential loss of future earnings or fair value from market risk sensitive instruments over a selected time period due to a 10% unfavorable change in commodity prices or interest rates.

Commodity Price Risk

To manage price risk, Dominion and Virginia Power primarily hold commodity-based financial derivative instruments held for non-trading purposes associated with purchases and sales of elec-

50


tricity,electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products. As part of its strategy to market energy and to manage related risks, Dominion also holds commodity-based financial derivative instruments for trading purposes.

The derivatives used to manage commodity price risk are executed within established policies and procedures and may include instruments such as futures, forwards, swaps, options and FTRs that are sensitive to changes in the related commodity prices. For sensitivity analysis purposes, the hypothetical change

in market prices of commodity-based financial derivative instruments is determined based on models that consider the market prices of commodities in future periods, the volatility of the market prices in each period, as well as the time value factors of the derivative instruments. Prices and volatility are principally determined based on observable market prices.

A hypothetical 10% unfavorable change in marketcommodity prices of Dominion’s non-trading commodity-based financial derivative instruments would have resulted in a decrease in fair value of approximately $183$128 million and $150$179 million as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively. A hypothetical 10% unfavorable change in commodity prices would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $5 million and $11 million in the fair value of Dominion’s commodity-based financial derivative instruments held for trading purposes would have resulted in a decrease in fair value of approximately $18 million and $8 million as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

A hypothetical 10% unfavorable change in commodity prices would not have resulted in a material change in the fair value of Virginia Power’s non-trading commodity-based financial derivatives as of December 31, 20102012 or 2009.2011.

The impact of a change in energy commodity prices on Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s non-trading commodity-based financial derivative instruments at a point in time is not necessarily representative of the results that will be realized when the contracts are ultimately settled. Net losses from commodity derivative instruments used for hedging purposes, to the extent realized, will generally be offset by recognition of the hedged transaction, such as revenue from physical sales of the commodity.

Interest Rate Risk

Dominion and Virginia Power manage their interest rate risk exposure predominantly by maintaining a balance of fixed and variable rate debt. They also enter into interest rate sensitive derivatives, including interest rate swaps and interest rate lock agreements. For financial instrumentsvariable rate debt and interest rate swaps designated under fair value hedging and outstanding for Dominion and Virginia Power, a hypothetical 10% increase in market interest rates would not have resulted in a material change in annual earnings atas of December 31, 20102012 or 2009.2011.

Dominion and Virginia Power may also use forward-starting interest rate swaps and interest rate lock agreements as anticipatory hedges. AtAs of December 31, 2009,2012, Dominion and Virginia Power had $1.7$1.8 billion and $850$750 million, respectively, in aggregate notional amounts of these interest rate derivatives outstanding. At December 31, 2009, aA hypothetical 10% decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $62$21 million and $33$9 million, respectively, in the fair value of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s interest rate derivatives at December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2011, Dominion and Virginia Power had $2.3 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, in aggregate notional amounts of these interest rate derivatives held by Dominionoutstanding. A hypothetical 10% decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $31 million and $15 million, respectively, in the fair value of Dominion’s and Virginia Power, respectively. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, all forward-starting

Power’s interest rate swap contracts were terminated; therefore, Dominion and Virginia Power have no sensitivity to changes in interest rates related to these interest rate swaps.derivatives at December 31, 2011.

The impact of a change in market interest rates on these anticipatory hedgesDominion’s and Virginia Power’s interest rate-based financial derivative instruments at a point in time is not necessarily representative of the

50


results that will be realized when suchthe contracts are ultimately settled. Net gains and/or losses from interest rate derivativesderivative instruments used for anticipatory hedging purposes, to the extent realized, will generally be amortized over the lifeoffset by recognition of the respective debt issuance being hedged.hedged transaction.

Investment Price Risk

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to investment price risk due to securities held as investments in nuclear decommissioning and rabbi trust funds that are managed by third-party investment managers. These trust funds primarily hold marketable securities that are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.

Dominion recognized net realized gains (including investment income) on nuclear decommissioning and rabbi trust investments of $95$126 million and $25$54 million in 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively. Net realized gains and losses include gains and losses from the sale of investments as well as any other-than-temporary declines in fair value. In 20102012 and 2009,2011, Dominion recorded, in AOCI and regulatory liabilities, a net increase in unrealized gains on these investments of $182$210 million and $360$52 million, respectively.

Virginia Power recognized net realized gains (including investment income) on nuclear decommissioning trust investments of $44$53 million and $24 million in 2010. Virginia Power recognized net realized losses (net of investment income) on nuclear decommissioning trust investments of $3 million in 2009.2012 and 2011, respectively. Net realized gains and losses include gains and losses from the sale of investments as well as any other-than-temporary declines in fair value. In 20102012 and 2009,2011, Virginia Power recorded, in AOCI and regulatory liabilities, a net increase in unrealized gains on these investments of $67$89 million and $149$25 million, respectively.

Dominion sponsors pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans that hold investments in trusts to fund employee benefit payments. Virginia Power employees participate in these plans. Aggregate actual returns for Dominion’s pension and other postretirement plan assets were $624$743 million in 2010 2012

and $777$273 million in 2009,2011, versus expected returns of $479$509 million and $462$519 million, respectively. Differences between actual and expected returns on plan assets are accumulated and amortized during future periods. As such, any investment-related declines in these trusts will result in future increases in the periodic cost recognized for employee benefit plans and will be included in the determination of the amount of cash to be contributed to the employee benefit plans. As of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, a hypothetical 0.25% decrease in the assumed long-term rates of return on Dominion’s plan assets would result in an increase in net periodic cost of approximately $13 million for pension benefits and $3 million for other postretirement benefits.

Risk Management Policies

Dominion and Virginia Power have established operating procedures with corporate management to ensure that proper internal controls are maintained. In addition, Dominion has established an independent function at the corporate level to monitor compliance with the credit and commodity risk management policies

51


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued

of all subsidiaries, including Virginia Power. Dominion maintains credit policies that include the evaluation of a prospective counterparty’s financial condition, collateral requirements where deemed necessary and the use of standardized agreements that facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty. In addition, Dominion also monitors the financial condition of existing counterparties on an ongoing basis. Based

on these credit policies and Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s December 31, 20102012 provision for credit losses, management believes that it is unlikely that a material adverse effect on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows would occur as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

 

 

52

51

 


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

 

 

    Page No. 

Dominion Resources, Inc.

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  5354

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010

  5455

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009

56

Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders’ Equity at December  31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended

58

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income at December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010 and for the years then ended

  55

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011

5956

Consolidated Statements of Equity at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and for the years then ended

58

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010

  5960

Virginia Electric and Power Company

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  6061

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010

  61

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income at December  31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and for the years then ended

6362

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20102012 and 20092011

  6364

Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder’s Equity at December  31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010 and for the years then ended

  6566

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income at December  31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended

67

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010

  6668

Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  6769

 

52   53

 


REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Dominion Resources, Inc.

Richmond, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dominion Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Dominion”) as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, common shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010.2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of Dominion’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dominion Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010,2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2009 Dominion changed its methods of accounting to adopt a new accounting standard for the impairment framework for oil and gas properties.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 201127, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Richmond, Virginia

February 25,27, 2013

53


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011(1)  2010(1) 
(millions, except per share amounts)          

Operating Revenue

  $13,093   $14,145   $14,927  

Operating Expenses

    

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   3,748    4,097    4,034  

Purchased electric capacity

   387    454    453  

Purchased gas

   1,177    1,764    2,049  

Other operations and maintenance(2)

   4,868    3,322    3,448  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   1,186    1,066    1,035  

Other taxes

   571    548    524  

Total operating expenses

   11,937    11,251    11,543  

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations

           2,467  

Income from operations

   1,156    2,894    5,851  

Other income

   223    178    170  

Interest and related charges

   882    867    826  

Income from continuing operations including noncontrolling interests before income taxes

   497    2,205    5,195  

Income tax expense

   146    754    2,112  

Income from continuing operations including noncontrolling interests

   351    1,451    3,083  

Loss from discontinued operations(3)

   (22  (25  (258

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   329    1,426    2,825  

Noncontrolling interests

   27    18    17  

Net income attributable to Dominion

   302    1,408    2,808  

Amounts attributable to Dominion:

    

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

   324    1,433    3,066  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (22  (25  (258

Net income attributable to Dominion

   302    1,408    2,808  

Earnings Per Common Share-Basic:

    

Income from continuing operations

  $0.57   $2.50   $5.21  

Loss from discontinued operations

   (0.04  (0.04  (0.44

Net income attributable to Dominion

  $0.53   $2.46   $4.77  

Earnings Per Common Share-Diluted:

    

Income from continuing operations

  $0.57   $2.49   $5.20  

Loss from discontinued operations

   (0.04  (0.04  (0.44

Net income attributable to Dominion

  $0.53   $2.45   $4.76  

Dividends declared per common share

  $2.11   $1.97   $1.83  

(1)Recast to reflect Salem Harbor and State Line as discontinued operations as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. EPS amounts reflect the per share impact of the recast.
(2)For 2012, includes impairment and other charges of $2.1 billion related to Brayton Point, Kincaid and Kewaunee. See Note 6 for additional information.
(3)Includes income tax benefit of $27 million, $9 million, and $34 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Dominion’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

54    

 


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009(1)   2008(1) 
(millions, except per share amounts)           

Operating Revenue

  $15,197   $14,798    $15,895  

Operating Expenses

     

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   4,150    4,285     4,023  

Purchased electric capacity

   453    411     411  

Purchased gas

   2,050    2,200     3,166  

Other operations and maintenance

   3,724    3,712     3,284  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   1,055    1,138     1,034  

Other taxes

   532    483     493  

Total operating expenses

   11,964    12,229     12,411  

Gain on sale of Appalachian E&P operations

   2,467           

Income from operations

   5,700    2,569     3,484  

Other income (loss)

   169    194     (42

Interest and related charges

   832    889     829  

Income from continuing operations including noncontrolling interests before income taxes

   5,037    1,874     2,613  

Income tax expense

   2,057    596     953  

Income from continuing operations including noncontrolling interests

   2,980    1,278     1,660  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(2)

   (155  26     190  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   2,825    1,304     1,850  

Noncontrolling interests

   17    17     16  

Net income attributable to Dominion

   2,808    1,287     1,834  

Amounts attributable to Dominion:

     

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

   2,963    1,261     1,644  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (155  26     190  

Net income

   2,808    1,287     1,834  

Earnings Per Common Share—Basic:

     

Income from continuing operations

  $5.03   $2.13    $2.84  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (0.26  0.04     0.33  

Net income

  $4.77   $2.17    $3.17  

Earnings Per Common Share—Diluted:

     

Income from continuing operations

  $5.02   $2.13    $2.83  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (0.26  0.04     0.33  

Net income

  $4.76   $2.17    $3.16  

Dividends paid per common share

  $1.83   $1.75    $1.58  

(1)Recast to reflect Peoples as discontinued operations as described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. EPS amounts reflect the per share impact of the recast.
(2)Includes income tax expense (benefit) of $21 million, $16 million and $(76) million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Net income including noncontrolling interests

  $329   $1,426   $2,825  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:

    

Net deferred gains (losses) on derivatives-hedging activities, net of $5, $48 and $(52) tax

   (8  (67  84  

Changes in unrealized net gains on investment securities, net of $(68), $(7) and $(54) tax

   108    11    89  

Changes in net unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs, net of $209, $147 and $40 tax

   (330  (231  (18

Amounts reclassified to net income:

    

Net derivative (gains)-hedging activities, net of $34, $28 and $193 tax

   (60  (38  (314

Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, net of $16, $(4) and $9 tax

   (25  6    (14

Net pension and other postretirement benefit costs, net of $(32), $(25) and $(38) tax

   48    39    54  

Total other comprehensive loss

   (267  (280  (119

Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interests

   62    1,146    2,706  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   27    18    17  

Comprehensive income attributable to Dominion

  $35   $1,128   $2,689  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Dominion’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

    55

 


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

At December 31,  2010 2009   2012 2011 
(millions)            
ASSETS      

Current Assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $62   $48    $248   $102  

Customer receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $26 and $31)

   2,158    2,050  

Other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $9 and $14)

   88    130  

Customer receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $28 and $29)

   1,621    1,780  

Other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 and $8)

   96    255  

Inventories:

      

Materials and supplies

   609    590     684    641  

Fossil fuel

   354    408     467    541  

Gas stored

   200    187     108    166  

Derivative assets

   739    1,128     518    705  

Assets held for sale

   —      1,018  

Regulatory assets

   407    170     203    541  

Prepayments

   277    405     326    262  

Deferred income taxes

   573    9  

Other

   506    683     296    428  

Total current assets

   5,400    6,817     5,140    5,430  

Investments

      

Nuclear decommissioning trust funds

   2,897    2,625     3,330    2,999  

Investment in equity method affiliates

   571    595     558    553  

Restricted cash equivalents

   400    —       33    141  

Other

   283    272     270    292  

Total investments

   4,151    3,492     4,191    3,985  

Property, Plant and Equipment

      

Property, plant and equipment

   39,855    39,036     43,364    42,033  

Property, plant and equipment, VIE

   957    957  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (13,142  (13,444   (13,548  (13,320

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   26,713    25,592     30,773    29,670  

Deferred Charges and Other Assets

      

Goodwill

   3,141    3,354     3,130    3,141  

Pension and other postretirement benefit assets

   712    702     702    681  

Intangible assets

   642    693     536    637  

Regulatory assets

   1,446    1,390     1,717    1,382  

Other

   612    514     649    688  

Total deferred charges and other assets

   6,553    6,653     6,734    6,529  

Total assets

  $42,817   $42,554    $46,838   $45,614  

 

56    

 


 

 

At December 31,  2010 2009   2012 2011 
(millions)            
LIABILITIESAND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
LIABILITIESAND EQUITY   

Current Liabilities

      

Securities due within one year

  $497   $1,137    $1,363   $1,479  

Securities due within one year, VIE

   860      

Short-term debt

   1,386    1,295     2,412    1,814  

Accounts payable

   1,562    1,401     1,137    1,250  

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   849    676     636    648  

Derivative liabilities

   633    679     510    951  

Liabilities held for sale

   —      428  

Regulatory liabilities

   135    536     136    243  

Accrued severance

   132    4  

Other

   579    677     709    577  

Total current liabilities

   5,773    6,833     7,763    6,962  

Long-Term Debt

      

Long-term debt

   14,023    13,730     15,478    14,785  

Junior subordinated notes payable to affiliates

   268    268  

Enhanced junior subordinated notes

   1,467    1,483  

Long-term debt, VIE

       890  

Junior subordinated notes

   1,373    1,719  

Total long-term debt

   15,758    15,481     16,851    17,394  

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities

      

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

   4,708    4,244     5,800    5,216  

Asset retirement obligations

   1,577    1,605     1,641    1,383  

Pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities

   765    1,260     1,831    962  

Regulatory liabilities

   1,392    1,215     1,514    1,324  

Other

   590    474     556    613  

Total deferred credits and other liabilities

   9,032    8,798     11,342    9,498  

Total liabilities

   30,563    31,112     35,956    33,854  

Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 23)

   

Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 22)

   

Subsidiary Preferred Stock Not Subject To Mandatory Redemption

   257    257     257    257  

Common Shareholders’ Equity

   

Common stock—no par(1)

   5,715    6,525  

Equity

   

Common stock-no par(1)

   5,493    5,180  

Other paid-in capital

   194    185     162    179  

Retained earnings

   6,418    4,686     5,790    6,697  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (330  (211   (877  (610

Total common shareholders’ equity

   11,997    11,185     10,568    11,446  

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $42,817   $42,554  

Noncontrolling interest

   57    57  

Total equity

   10,625    11,503  

Total liabilities and equity

  $46,838   $45,614  

 

(1)1 billion shares authorized; 581576 million shares and 599570 million shares outstanding at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Dominion’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

    57

 


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

  Common Stock Dominion Shareholders         Common Stock Dominion Shareholders          
  Shares Amount Other
Paid-In
Capital
   Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Noncontrolling
interest
 Total   Shares Amount Other
Paid-In
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total Common
Shareholders’
Equity
 Noncontrolling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 
(millions)                                    

Balance at December 31, 2007

   577   $5,733   $175    $3,510   $(12 $29   $9,435  

December 31, 2009

   599   $6,525   $185   $4,686   $(211 $11,185   $   $11,185  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

       1,851      (1  1,850        2,825     2,825     2,825  

Issuance of stock—employee and direct stock purchase plans

   4    196         196  

Stock awards and stock options exercised (net of change in unearned compensation)

   2    65         65  

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

        7        7  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)

       (2    (2

Deconsolidation of noncontrolling interest

         (28  (28

Dividends(2)

       (1,189)(3)     (1,189

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

       (257  (257

Balance at December 31, 2008

   583    5,994    182     4,170    (269      10,077  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

       1,304       1,304  

Issuance of stock—employee and direct stock purchase plans

   6    212         212  

Stock awards and stock options exercised (net of change in unearned compensation)

   2    70         70  

Other stock issuances(4)

   8    249         249  

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

     3        3  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)

       12    (12     

Dividends(2)

       (800    (800

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

       70    70  

Balance at December 31, 2009

   599    6,525    185     4,686    (211      11,185  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

       2,825      2,825  

Issuance of stock—employee and direct stock purchase plans

   1    10         10  

Issuance of stock-employee and direct stock purchase plans

   1    10       10     10  

Stock awards and stock options exercised (net of change in unearned compensation)

   2    80         80     2    80       80     80  

Stock repurchases

   (21  (900       (900   (21  (900     (900   (900

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

     9        9       9      9     9  

Dividends(2)

       (1,093    (1,093

Dividends(1)

      (1,093   (1,093   (1,093

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

       (119  (119    (119  (119  (119

Balance at December 31, 2010

   581   $5,715   $194    $6,418   $(330     $11,997  

December 31, 2010

   581    5,715    194    6,418    (330  11,997        11,997  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

      1,425     1,425    1    1,426  

Consolidation of noncontrolling interests(2)

            61    61  

Stock awards and stock options exercised (net of change in unearned compensation)

   1    49       49     49  

Stock repurchases

   (13  (601     (601   (601

Other stock issuances(3)

   1    17    (17           

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

     2      2     2  

Dividends

      (1,146)(1)    (1,146  (5  (1,151

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

    (280  (280  (280

December 31, 2011

   570    5,180    179    6,697    (610  11,446    57    11,503  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

      318     318    11    329  

Issuance of stock-employee and direct stock purchase plans

   4    246       246     246  

Stock awards and stock options exercised (net of change in unearned compensation)

   1    26       26     26  

Other stock issuances(3)

   1    41    (27    14     14  

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

     10      10     10  

Dividends

      (1,225)(1)    (1,225  (11  (1,236

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

    (267  (267  (267

December 31, 2012

   576   $5,493   $162   $5,790   $(877 $10,568   $57   $10,625  

 

(1)See Note 3 for additional information.
(2)Includes subsidiary preferred dividends related to noncontrolling interests of $17 million, $17 million and $16 million in 2010, 20092012 and 2008, respectively.$17 million in 2011 and 2010.
(2)See Note 15 for consolidation of a VIE in October 2011.
(3)Includes $256 millionContains shares issued in excess of accrued dividends dueprincipal amounts related to the early declaration of the first quarter 2009 common dividend in December 2008.
(4)Includes at-the-market issuances and a debt-for-common stock exchange.converted securities. See Note 17 for further information on convertible securities.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Dominion’s Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements

 

58    

 


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive IncomeCash Flows

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009(1)  2008 
(millions)          

Net income including noncontrolling interests

  $2,825   $1,304   $1,850  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:

    

Net deferred gains on derivatives-hedging activities, net of $(52), $(195) and $(308) tax

   84    323    497  

Changes in unrealized net gains (losses) on investment securities, net of $(54), $(86) and $175 tax

   89    134    (264

Changes in net unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs, net of $40, $(99) and $421 tax

   (18  136    (662

Amounts reclassified to net income:

    

Net derivative (gains) losses-hedging activities, net of $193, $336 and $(33) tax

   (314  (549  52  

Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, net of $9, $(1) and $(77) tax

   (14  2    111  

Net pension and other postretirement benefit costs, net of $(38), $(19) and $(8) tax

   54    24    9  

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

   (119  70    (257

Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interests

   2,706    1,374    1,593  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   17    17    16  

Comprehensive income attributable to Dominion

  $2,689   $1,357   $1,577  

(1)Other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2009 excludes a $20 million ($12 million after-tax) adjustment to AOCI representing the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments.
Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Operating Activities

    

Net income including noncontrolling interests

  $329   $1,426   $2,825  

Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Gain from sale of Appalachian E&P operations

           (2,467

Loss from sale of Peoples

           113  

Impairment of generation assets (including discontinued operations)

   2,089    283    194  

Net reserves (payments) related to rate refunds

   (151  3    (500

Contributions to pension plans

           (650

Charges (payments) related to workforce reduction program

   (9  (115  229  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization (including nuclear fuel)

   1,443    1,288    1,258  

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

   246    756    682  

Gain on the sale of assets to Blue Racer

   (81        

Other adjustments

   (155  (92  (40

Changes in:

    

Accounts receivable

   292    365    (60

Inventories

   33    (185  35  

Deferred fuel and purchased gas costs, net

   368    (3  (246

Prepayments

   (85  (19  139  

Accounts payable

   (61  (413  119  

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   (12  (216  166  

Other operating assets and liabilities

   (109  (95  28  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   4,137    2,983    1,825  

Investing Activities

    

Plant construction and other property additions (including nuclear fuel)

   (4,145  (3,652  (3,422

Proceeds from sale of Appalachian E&P operations

           3,450  

Proceeds from sale of Peoples

           741  

Proceeds from sales of securities

   1,356    1,757    2,814  

Purchases of securities

   (1,392  (1,824  (2,851

Proceeds from Blue Racer

   115          

Restricted cash equivalents

   108    259    (396

Other

   118    139    83  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   (3,840  (3,321  419  

Financing Activities

    

Issuance of short-term debt, net

   598    429    91  

Issuance of short-term notes

   400          

Issuance and remarketing of long-term debt

   1,500    2,320    1,090  

Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt

   (1,675  (637  (1,492

Issuance of common stock

   265    38    74  

Repurchase of common stock

       (601  (900

Common dividend payments

   (1,209  (1,129  (1,076

Subsidiary preferred dividend payments

   (16  (17  (17

Other

   (14  (25  (2

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (151  378    (2,232

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

   146    40    12  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   102    62    50  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $248   $102   $62  

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

    

Cash paid (received) during the year for:

    

Interest and related charges, excluding capitalized amounts

  $913   $920   $894  

Income taxes

   (58  166    991  

Significant noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Accrued capital expenditures

   388    328    240  

Consolidation of VIE—assets at fair value

       957      

Consolidation of VIE—debt

       896      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Dominion’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

    59

 


Dominion Resources, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009  2008 
(millions)          

Operating Activities

    

Net income including noncontrolling interests

  $2,825   $1,304   $1,850  

Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interests to net cash from operating activities:

    

Gain from sale of Appalachian E&P operations

   (2,467        

Loss from sale of Peoples

   113         

Charges related to workforce reduction program

   229         

Impairment of merchant generation assets

   194         

Impairment of gas and oil properties

   21    455      

Reserve for rate refunds

       794      

Rate refunds

   (500        

Contributions to qualified pension plans

   (650        

Depreciation, depletion and amortization (including nuclear fuel)

   1,258    1,319    1,191  

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net

   682    (494  269  

Other adjustments

   (61  (137  174  

Changes in:

    

Accounts receivable

   (60  458    (222

Inventories

   35    (10  (116

Prepayments

   139    (234  222  

Deferred fuel and purchased gas costs, net

   (246  802    (532

Accounts payable

   119    (156  (268

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   166    (81  (177

Margin deposit assets and liabilities

   (147  (273  210  

Other operating assets and liabilities

   175    39    75  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   1,825    3,786    2,676  

Investing Activities

    

Plant construction and other property additions

   (3,384  (3,665  (3,315

Additions to gas and oil properties, including acquisitions

   (38  (172  (239

Proceeds from assignment of natural gas drilling rights

           343  

Proceeds from sale of Appalachian E&P operations

   3,450          

Proceeds from sale of Peoples

   741          

Proceeds from sales of securities and loan receivable collections and payoffs

   2,814    1,478    1,394  

Purchases of securities and loan receivable originations

   (2,851  (1,511  (1,355

Investment in affiliates and partnerships

   (2  (43  (376

Distributions from affiliates and partnerships

   47    174    18  

Restricted cash equivalents

   (396  1    9  

Other

   38    43    31  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   419    (3,695  (3,490

Financing Activities

    

Issuance (repayment) of short-term debt, net

   91    (735  273  

Issuance of long-term debt

   1,090    1,695    3,290  

Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt

   (1,492  (447  (1,842

Repayment of affiliated notes payable

           (412

Issuance of common stock

   74    456    240  

Repurchase of common stock

   (900        

Common dividend payments

   (1,076  (1,039  (916

Subsidiary preferred dividend payments

   (17  (17  (17

Other

   (2  (25  (18

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (2,232  (112  598  

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   12    (21  (216

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   50    71    287  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year(1)

  $62   $50   $71  

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

    

Cash paid during the year for:

    

Interest and related charges, excluding capitalized amounts

  $894   $890   $841  

Income taxes

   991    1,480    413  

Significant noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Accrued capital expenditures

   240    240    194  

Debt for equity exchange

       56      

Accrued common and preferred dividends

           260  

(1)2009 and 2008 amounts include $2 million and $5 million, respectively, of cash classified as held for sale in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Dominion’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

60


REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

Virginia Electric and Power Company

Richmond, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Virginia Electric and Power Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dominion Resources, Inc.) and subsidiaries (“Virginia Power”) as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, common shareholder’s equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010.2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of Virginia Power’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Virginia Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Virginia Power’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Virginia Electric and Power Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010,2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Richmond, Virginia

February 25, 2011

61


[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

27, 2013

 

6260    

 


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010   2009   2008   2012   2011   2010 
(millions)                        

Operating Revenue

  $7,219    $6,584    $6,934    $7,226    $7,246    $7,219  

Operating Expenses

            

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   2,495     2,972     2,707     2,368     2,506     2,495  

Purchased electric capacity

   449     409     410     386     452     449  

Other operations and maintenance:

            

Affiliated suppliers

   384     324     399     305     306     384  

Other

   1,361     1,299     1,006     1,161     1,437     1,361  

Depreciation and amortization

   671     641     608     782     718     671  

Other taxes

   218     191     183     232     222     218  

Total operating expenses

   5,578     5,836     5,313     5,234     5,641     5,578  

Income from operations

   1,641     748     1,621     1,992     1,605     1,641  

Other income

   100     104     52     96     88     100  

Interest and related charges

   347     349     309     385     331     347  

Income from operations before income tax expense

   1,394     503     1,364     1,703     1,362     1,394  

Income tax expense

   542     147     500     653     540     542  

Net Income

   852     356     864     1,050     822     852  

Preferred dividends

   17     17     17     16     17     17  

Balance available for common stock

  $835    $339    $847    $1,034    $805    $835  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

    6361


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Net income

  $1,050   $822   $852  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:

    

Net deferred losses on derivatives-hedging activities, net of $3, $3 and $1 tax

   (5  (6  (1

Changes in unrealized net gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of $(7), $(1) and $(6) tax

   13    2    9  

Amounts reclassified to net income:

    

Net derivative (gains) losses-hedging activities, net of $(2), $—and $4 tax

   2    (1  (8

Net realized gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of $2, $—and $2 tax

   (4      (2

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   6    (5  (2

Comprehensive income

  $1,056   $817   $850  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

62

 


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

At December 31,  2012  2011 
(millions)       
ASSETS   

Current Assets

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $28   $29  

Customer receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $10 and $11)

   849    892  

Other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 and $7)

   51    145  

Inventories (average cost method):

   

Materials and supplies

   385    359  

Fossil fuel

   404    438  

Prepayments

   23    41  

Regulatory assets

   119    479  

Deferred income taxes

   92      

Other

   30    53  

Total current assets

   1,981    2,436  

Investments

   

Nuclear decommissioning trust funds

   1,515    1,370  

Other

   14    36  

Total investments

   1,529    1,406  

Property, Plant and Equipment

   

Property, plant and equipment

   30,631    28,626  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (10,014  (9,615

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   20,617    19,011  

Deferred Charges and Other Assets

   

Intangible assets

   181    183  

Regulatory assets

   396    399  

Other

   107    109  

Total deferred charges and other assets

   684    691  

Total assets

  $24,811   $23,544  

 

At December 31,  2010  2009 
(millions)       
ASSETS   

Current Assets

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $5   $19  

Customer receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $11 and $12)

   905    880  

Other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $6 at both dates)

   54    72  

Inventories (average cost method):

   

Materials and supplies

   314    306  

Fossil fuel

   283    308  

Derivative assets

   27    110  

Prepayments

   65    52  

Deferred income taxes

       222  

Regulatory assets

   318    116  

Other

   10    11  

Total current assets

   1,981    2,096  

Investments

   

Nuclear decommissioning trust funds

   1,319    1,204  

Restricted cash equivalents

   169      

Other

   4    4  

Total investments

   1,492    1,208  

Property, Plant and Equipment

   

Property, plant and equipment

   27,607    25,643  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (9,712  (9,314

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   17,895    16,329  

Deferred Charges and Other Assets

   

Intangible assets

   212    217  

Regulatory assets

 �� 370    200  

Other

   312    68  

Total deferred charges and other assets

   894    485  

Total assets

  $22,262   $20,118  
63


At December 31,  2012   2011 
(millions)        
LIABILITIESAND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY    

Current Liabilities

    

Securities due within one year

  $418    $616  

Short-term debt

   992     894  

Accounts payable

   430     405  

Payables to affiliates

   67     108  

Affiliated current borrowings

   435     187  

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   204     226  

Derivative liabilities

   33     135  

Customer deposits

   100     106  

Regulatory liabilities

   32     178  

Deferred income taxes

        91  

Other

   296     175  

Total current liabilities

   3,007     3,121  

Long-Term Debt

   6,251     6,246  

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities

    

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

   3,879     3,180  

Asset retirement obligations

   705     624  

Regulatory liabilities

   1,285     1,095  

Other

   194     271  

Total deferred credits and other liabilities

   6,063     5,170  

Total liabilities

   15,321     14,537  

Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 22)

          

Preferred Stock Not Subject to Mandatory Redemption

   257     257  

Common Shareholder’s Equity

    

Common stock-no par(1)

   5,738     5,738  

Other paid-in capital

   1,113     1,111  

Retained earnings

   2,357     1,882  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   25     19  

Total common shareholder’s equity

   9,233     8,750  

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity

  $24,811    $23,544  

(1)500,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2012 and 2011; 274,723 shares outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

64    

 


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder’s Equity

 

At December 31,  2010   2009 
(millions)        
LIABILITIESAND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY    

Current Liabilities

    

Securities due within one year

  $15    $245  

Short-term debt

   600     442  

Accounts payable

   499     390  

Payables to affiliates

   76     67  

Affiliated current borrowings

   103     2  

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   214     213  

Customer deposits

   116     117  

Regulatory liabilities

   109     491  

Deferred income taxes

   83       

Accrued severance

   58       

Other

   205     241  

Total current liabilities

   2,078     2,208  

Long-Term Debt

   6,702     6,213  

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities

    

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

   2,672     2,359  

Asset retirement obligations

   669     636  

Regulatory liabilities

   1,174     995  

Other

   203     277  

Total deferred credits and other liabilities

   4,718     4,267  

Total liabilities

   13,498     12,688  

Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 23)

          

Preferred Stock Not Subject to Mandatory Redemption

   257     257  

Common Shareholder’s Equity

    

Common stock—no par(1)

   5,738     4,738  

Other paid-in capital

   1,111     1,110  

Retained earnings

   1,634     1,299  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   24     26  

Total common shareholder’s equity

   8,507     7,173  

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity

  $22,262    $20,118  

 

(1)300,000 shares authorized; 274,723 shares and 241,710 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
    Common Stock   Other
Paid-In
Capital
   Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total 
    Shares   Amount       
(millions, except for shares)  (thousands)                   

Balance at December 31, 2009

   242    $4,738    $1,110    $1,299   $26   $7,173  

Net income

         852     852  

Issuance of stock to Dominion

   33     1,000         1,000  

Dividends

         (517   (517

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

       1       1  

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

                      (2  (2

Balance at December 31, 2010

   275     5,738     1,111     1,634    24    8,507  

Net income

         822     822  

Dividends

         (574   (574

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

                      (5  (5

Balance at December 31, 2011

   275     5,738     1,111     1,882    19    8,750  

Net income

         1,050     1,050  

Dividends

         (575   (575

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

       2       2  

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

                      6    6  

Balance at December 31, 2012

   275    $5,738    $1,113    $2,357   $25   $9,233  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

    65

 


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder’s EquityCash Flows

 

 

    Common Stock��  Other
Paid-In
Capital
   Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total 
    Shares   Amount       
(millions, except for shares)  (thousands)                   

Balance at December 31, 2007

   198    $3,388    $1,109    $1,015   $29   $5,541  

Net income

         864     864  

Issuance of stock to Dominion

   12     350         350  

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

       1       1  

Dividends

         (458   (458

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

                      (24  (24

Balance at December 31, 2008

   210     3,738     1,110     1,421    5    6,274  

Net income

         356     356  

Issuance of stock to Dominion

   32     1,000         1,000  

Dividends

         (480   (480

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)

         2    (2    

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

                      23    23  

Balance at December 31, 2009

   242     4,738     1,110     1,299    26    7,173  

Net income

         852     852  

Issuance of stock to Dominion

   33     1,000         1,000  

Dividends

         (517   (517

Tax benefit from stock awards and stock options exercised

       1       1  

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

                      (2  (2

Balance at December 31, 2010

   275    $5,738    $1,111    $1,634   $24   $8,507  

(1)See Note 3 for additional information.
Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Operating Activities

    

Net income

  $1,050   $822   $852  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization (including nuclear fuel)

   927    838    782  

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net

   502    496    609  

Impairment of generation assets

       228      

Net reserves (payments) related to rate refunds

   (151  3    (500

Contributions to pension plans

           (302

Charges (payments) related to workforce reduction program

   (4  (53  98  

Other adjustments

   (66  (40  (40

Changes in:

    

Accounts receivable

   126    76    (9

Affiliated accounts receivable and payable

   (2  (7  11  

Inventories

   8    (200  17  

Deferred fuel expenses, net

   378    12    (213

Prepayments

   18    24    (10

Accounts payable

   19    (117  108  

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   (22  12    1  

Other operating assets and liabilities

   (77  (70  5  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   2,706    2,024    1,409  

Investing Activities

    

Plant construction and other property additions

   (2,082  (1,885  (2,113

Purchases of nuclear fuel

   (206  (205  (121

Purchases of securities

   (638  (1,057  (1,211

Proceeds from sales of securities

   626    1,030    1,192  

Restricted cash equivalents

   22    137    (165

Other

   (4  33    (7

Net cash used in investing activities

   (2,282  (1,947  (2,425

Financing Activities

    

Issuance of short-term debt, net

   98    294    158  

Issuance of affiliated current borrowings, net

   248    85    1,101  

Issuance and remarketing of long-term debt

   450    235    605  

Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt

   (641  (91  (347

Common dividend payments

   (559  (557  (500

Preferred dividend payments

   (16  (17  (17

Other

   (5  (2  2  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (425  (53  1,002  

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (1  24    (14

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   29    5    19  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $28   $29   $5  

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

    

Cash paid (received) during the year for:

    

Interest and related charges, excluding capitalized amounts

  $376   $376   $349  

Income taxes

   225    (27  (101

Significant noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Accrued capital expenditures

   242    199    136  

Settlement of debt and issuance of common stock to Dominion

           1,000  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

66


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009(1)   2008 
(millions)           

Net income

  $852   $356    $864  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:

     

Net deferred gains (losses) on derivatives-hedging activities, net of $1, $(4) and $1 tax

   (1  8     (2

Changes in unrealized net gains (losses) on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of $(6), $(8) and $17 tax

   9    12     (29

Amounts reclassified to net income:

     

Net realized (gains) losses on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of $2, $(1) and $(5) tax

   (2  2     8  

Net derivative (gains) losses-hedging activities, net of $4, $(1) and $1 tax

   (8  1     (1

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (2  23     (24

Comprehensive income

  $850   $379    $840  

(1)Other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2009 excludes a $3 million ($2 million after-tax) adjustment to AOCI representing the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

67


Virginia Electric and Power Company

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009  2008 
(millions)          

Operating Activities

    

Net income

  $852   $356   $864  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization (including nuclear fuel)

   782    747    702  

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net

   609    (409  304  

Reserve for rate refunds

       782      

Rate refunds

   (500        

Contributions to qualified pension plans

   (302        

Charges related to workforce reduction program

   98          

Other adjustments

   (40  (58  (46

Changes in:

    

Accounts receivable

   (9  58    (205

Affiliated accounts receivable and payable

   11    (13  51  

Deferred fuel expenses, net

   (213  639    (423

Inventories

   17    (67  (27

Prepayments

   (10  (24  137  

Accounts payable

   108    (58  (131

Accrued interest, payroll and taxes

   1    (24  2  

Other operating assets and liabilities

   5    41    7  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   1,409    1,970    1,235  

Investing Activities

    

Plant construction and other property additions

   (2,113  (2,338  (1,902

Purchases of nuclear fuel

   (121  (150  (135

Purchases of securities

   (1,211  (731  (455

Proceeds from sales of securities

   1,192    715    410  

Restricted cash equivalents

   (165  1    9  

Other

   (7  (65  70  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (2,425  (2,568  (2,003

Financing Activities

    

Issuance of short-term debt, net

   158    145    40  

Issuance of affiliated current borrowings, net

   1,101    585    653  

Issuance of long-term debt

   605    460    1,490  

Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt

   (347  (126  (553

Repayment of affiliated notes payable

           (412

Common dividend payments

   (500  (463  (441

Preferred dividend payments

   (17  (17  (17

Other

   2    6    (14

Net cash provided by financing activities

   1,002    590    746  

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (14  (8  (22

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   19    27    49  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $5   $19   $27  

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

    

Cash paid (received) during the year for:

    

Interest and related charges, excluding capitalized amounts

  $349   $353   $320  

Income taxes

   (101  630    48  

Significant noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Accrued capital expenditures

   136    133    114  

Settlement of debt and issuance of common stock to Dominion

   1,000    1,000    350  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

68    

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

NOTE 1. NATUREOF OPERATIONS

Dominion, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, is one of the nation’s largest producers and transporters of energy. Dominion’s operations are conducted through various subsidiaries, including Virginia Power, a regulated public utility that generates, transmits and distributes electricity for sale in Virginia and North Carolina. Virginia Power is a member of PJM, an RTO, and its electric transmission facilities are integrated into the PJM wholesale electricity markets. All of Virginia Power’s common stock is owned by Dominion. Dominion’s operations also include a regulated interstate natural gas transmission pipeline and underground storage system in the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and Midwest states, an LNG import and storage facility in Maryland and regulated gas transportation and distribution operations in Ohio and West Virginia. As discussed in Note 4, Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations in April 2010. In addition, Dominion completed the sale of its Pennsylvania gas distribution operations in February 2010, which are reported as discontinued operations. Certain 2009 and 2008 amounts have been recast to reflect Peoples as discontinued operations. Dominion’s nonregulated operations include merchant generation, energy marketing and price risk management activities and retail energy marketing operations.

Dominion manages its daily operations through three primary operating segments: DVP, Dominion Generation and Dominion Energy. Dominion also reports a Corporate and Other segment, which includes its corporate, service company and other functions (including unallocated debt) and the net impact of Peoplesoperations that are expected to be and certain DCI operations,are currently discontinued, which areis discussed in Notes 4 and 25, respectively.Note 3. In addition, Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

Virginia Power manages its daily operations through two primary operating segments: DVP and Dominion Generation. It also reports a Corporate and Other segment that primarily includes specific items attributable to its operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments. See Note 2725 for further discussion of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operating segments.

 

 

NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

Dominion and Virginia Power make certain estimates and assumptions in preparing their Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and expensescash flows for the periods presented. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s Consolidated Financial Statements include, after eliminating intercompany transactions and balances, the accounts of their respective majority-owned subsidiaries.subsidiaries and those VIEs where Dominion has been determined to be the primary beneficiary.

Dominion and Virginia Power report certain contracts, instruments and investments at fair value. See Note 76 for further information on fair value measurements.

Dominion maintains pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Virginia Power participates in certain of these plans. See Note 2221 for further information on these plans.

Certain amounts in the 20092011 and 20082010 Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes have been reclassified to conform to the 20102012 presentation for comparative purposes. The reclassifications did not affect the Companies’ net income, total assets, liabilities, shareholders’ equity or cash flows.

Amounts disclosed for Dominion are inclusive of Virginia Power, where applicable.

Operating Revenue

Operating revenue is recorded on the basis of services rendered, commodities delivered or contracts settled and includes amounts yet to be billed to customers. The Companies collect sales, consumption and consumer utility taxes; however, these amounts are excluded from revenue. Dominion’s customer receivables at December 31, 20102012 and 20092011 included $466$411 million and $409$423 million, respectively, of accrued unbilled revenue based on estimated amounts of electricity orand natural gas delivered but not yet billed to its utility customers. Virginia Power’s customer receivables at December 31, 20102012 and 20092011 included $397$348 million and $355$360 million, respectively, of accrued unbilled revenue based on estimated amounts of electricity delivered but not yet billed to its customers.

The primary types of sales and service activities reported as operating revenue for Dominion are as follows:

Ÿ 

Regulated electric sales consist primarily of state-regulated retail electric sales, and federally-regulated wholesale electric sales and electric transmission services;

Ÿ 

Nonregulated electric sales consist primarily of sales of electricity at market-based rates and contracted fixed rates, and associated derivative activity;

Ÿ 

Regulated gas sales consist primarily of state-regulated retail natural gas sales and related distribution services;

Ÿ 

Nonregulated gas sales consist primarily of sales of natural gas production at market-based rates and contracted fixed prices, sales of gas purchased from third parties, gas trading and marketing revenue and associated derivative activity. Revenue from sales of gas production is recognized based on actual volumes of gas sold to purchasers and is reported net of royalties. Revenue from sales of gas production includes the sale of gas produced by Dominion and the recognition of revenue from the VPP transactions described in Note 11;royalties;

Ÿ 

Gas transportation and storage consists primarily of regulated sales of gathering, transmission, distribution and storage services and associated derivative activity. Also included are regulated gas distribution charges to retail distribution service customers opting for alternate suppliers; and

Ÿ 

Other revenue consists primarily of sales of oil and NGL production and condensate, extracted products and associated derivative activity. Other revenue also includes miscellaneous service revenue from electric and gas distribution operations, and gas processing and handling revenue.

69


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The primary types of sales and service activities reported as operating revenue for Virginia Power are as follows:

Ÿ 

Regulated electric sales consist primarily of state-regulated retail electric sales and federally-regulated wholesale electric sales and electric transmission services; and

Ÿ 

Other revenue consists primarily of excess generation sold at market-based rates, miscellaneous service revenue from electric distribution operations and miscellaneous revenue from generation operations, including sales of capacity and other miscellaneous revenue.commodities.

67


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

Electric Fuel, Purchased Energy and Purchased Gas—DeferredGas-Deferred Costs

Where permitted by regulatory authorities, the differences between Virginia Power’s actual electric fuel and purchased energy expenses and Dominion’s purchased gas expenses and the related levels of recovery for these expenses in current rates are deferred and matched against recoveries in future periods. The deferral of costs in excess of current period fuel rate recovery is recognized as a regulatory asset, while rate recovery in excess of current period fuel expenses is recognized as a regulatory liability.

Of the cost of fuel used in electric generation and energy purchases to serve utility customers, approximately 84%83% is currently subject to deferred fuel accounting, while substantially all of the remaining amount is subject to recovery through similar mechanisms.

Income Taxes

A consolidated federal income tax return is filed for Dominion and its subsidiaries, including Virginia Power. In addition, where applicable, combined income tax returns for Dominion and its subsidiaries are filed in various states; otherwise, separate state income tax returns are filed. Virginia Power participates in an intercompany tax sharing agreement with Dominion and its subsidiaries, and its current income taxes are based on its taxable income or loss, determined on a separate company basis.

Accounting for income taxes involves an asset and liability approach. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are provided, representing future effects on income taxes for temporary differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Dominion and Virginia Power establish a valuation allowance when it is more-likely-than-not that all, or a portion, of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Where the treatment of temporary differences is different for rate-regulated operations, a regulatory asset is recognized if it is probable that future revenues will be provided for the payment of deferred tax liabilities.

Dominion and Virginia Power recognize positions taken, or expected to be taken, in income tax returns that are more-likely-than-not to be realized, assuming that the position will be examined by tax authorities with full knowledge of all relevant information.

If it is not more-likely-than-not that a tax position, or some portion thereof, will be sustained, the related tax benefits are not recognized in the financial statements. For a substantial amount of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s unrecognized tax benefits, the ultimate deductibility is highly certain; however, there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Unrecognized tax benefits may also include amounts for which uncertainty exists as to whether such amounts are deductible as ordinary deductions or capital losses. Unrecognized tax benefits may result in an increase in income taxes payable, a reduction of income tax

refunds receivable or changes in deferred taxes. Also, when uncertainty about the deductibility of an amount is limited to the timing of such deductibility, the increase in income taxes payable (or reduction in tax refunds receivable) is accompanied by a decrease in deferred tax liabilities. Noncurrent income taxes payable related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified in other deferred credits and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and current payables are included in accrued interest, payroll and taxes on the consolidated balance sheets, except when such amounts are presented net with amounts receivable from or amounts prepaid to tax authorities.

Dominion and Virginia Power recognize changes in estimated interest payable on net underpayments and overpayments of income taxes in interest expenseexpense. Changes in interest receivable related to net overpay-

ments of income taxes and estimated penalties that may result from the settlement of some uncertain tax positions are recognized in other income. In its Consolidated Statements of Income for 2010, 20092012, Dominion recognized interest income of $8 million and 2008,interest expense of $3 million and a reduction in penalties of less than $1 million. In 2011, Dominion recognized interest income of $12 million and interest expense of $7 million and a reduction in penalties of less than $1 million. In 2010, Dominion recognized a reduction in interest expense of $18 million and a reduction in penalties of less than $1 million, a reduction in interest expense of $19 million and a reduction in penalties of $2 million and less than $1 million of interest expense and no penalties, respectively.million. Dominion had accrued interest receivable of $27$5 million, and interest payable of $10 million and penalties payable of less than $1 million at December 31, 2010,2012 and interest receivable of $26$48 million, and interest payable of $10 million and penalties payable of $4less than $1 million at December 31, 2009.2011.

Virginia Power’s interest and penalties were immaterial in 2010, 20092012 and 2008.2010. In 2011, Virginia Power recognized interest income of $12 million, and penalties were immaterial. Virginia Power had accrued interest receivable of $17 million at December 31, 2011.

At December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet included $46$10 million of prepaid federal and state income taxes payable and $102$36 million of noncurrent federal and state income taxes payable.

At December 31, 2009,2011, Virginia Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet included $21$18 million of prepaidcurrent federal income taxes $3receivable, $34 million of current state income taxes payable and $45$110 million of noncurrent federal and state income taxes payable.

Investment tax credits are recognized by nonregulated operations in the year qualifying property is placed in service. For regulated operations, investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the service lives of the properties giving rise to the credits. Production tax credits are recognized as energy is generated and sold.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Current banking arrangements generally do not require checks to be funded until they are presented for payment. At December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, Dominion’s accounts payable included $56$53 million and $55$75 million, respectively, of checks outstanding but not yet presented for payment. At December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, Virginia Power’s accounts payable included $28$30 million and $22$40 million, respectively, of checks outstanding but not yet presented for payment. For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks and temporary investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

Derivative Instruments

Dominion and Virginia Power use derivative instruments such as futures, swaps, forwards, options and FTRs to manage the commodity, currency exchange and financial market risks of their business operations.

70


All derivatives, other than those for which an exception applies, are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Derivative contracts representing unrealized gain positions and purchased options are reported as derivative assets. Derivative contracts representing unrealized losses and options sold are

68


reported as derivative liabilities. One of the exceptions to fair value accounting, normal purchases and normal sales, may be elected when the contract satisfies certain criteria, including a requirement that physical delivery of the underlying commodity is probable. Expenses and revenues resulting from deliveries under normal purchase contracts and normal sales contracts, respectively, are included in earnings at the time of contract performance.

Dominion and Virginia Power do not offset amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral against amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. Dominion had margin assets of $244$212 million and $149$319 million associated with cash collateral at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively. Dominion had margin liabilities of $62$4 million and $114$66 million associated with cash collateral at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively. Virginia Power had margin assets of $18 million and $41 million associated with cash collateral at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Virginia Power’s margin assets and liabilities associated with cash collateral were not material at December 31, 20102012 and 2009.2011.

To manage price risk, Dominion and Virginia Power hold certain derivative instruments that are not held for trading purposes and are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. However, to the extent the Companies do not hold offsetting positions for such derivatives, they believe these instruments represent economic hedges that mitigate their exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. As part of Dominion’s strategy to market energy and manage related risks, it also manages a portfolio of commodity-based financial derivative instruments held for trading purposes. Dominion uses established policies and procedures to manage the risks associated with price fluctuations in these energy commodities and uses various derivative instruments to reduce risk by creating offsetting market positions.

Statement of Income Presentation:

Ÿ 

Derivatives Held for Trading Purposes: All income statement activity, including amounts realized upon settlement, is presented in operating revenue on a net basis.

Ÿ 

Derivatives Not Held for Trading Purposes: All income statement activity, including amounts realized upon settlement, is presented in operating revenue, operating expenses or interest and related charges based on the nature of the underlying risk.

In Virginia Power’s generation operations, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments result in the recognition of regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities for jurisdictions subject to cost-based rate regulation. Realized gains or losses on the derivative instruments are generally recognized when the related transactions impact earnings.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS DESIGNATEDAS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS

Dominion and Virginia Power designate a portion of their derivative instruments as either cash flow or fair value hedges for accounting purposes. For all derivatives designated as hedges, Dominion and Virginia Power formally document the relation-

shiprelationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and the strategy for using the hedging instrument. The Companies assess whether the hedginghedg-

ing relationship between the derivative and the hedged item is highly effective at offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values both at the inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis. Any change in the fair value of the derivative that is not effective at offsetting changes in the cash flows or fair values of the hedged item is recognized currently in earnings. Also, the Companies may elect to exclude certain gains or losses on hedging instruments from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as gains or losses attributable to changes in the time value of options or changes in the difference between spot prices and forward prices, thus requiring that such changes be recorded currently in earnings. Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively for derivatives that cease to be highly effective hedges. For derivative instruments that are accounted for as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges, the cash flows from the derivatives and from the related hedged items are classified in operating cash flows.

Cash Flow Hedges—A majority of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s hedge strategies represents cash flow hedges of the variable price risk associated with the purchase and sale of electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products. The Companies also use foreign currency contracts to hedge the variability in foreign exchange rates and interest rate swaps to hedge their exposure to variable interest rates on long-term debt. For transactions in which Dominion and Virginia Power are hedging the variability of cash flows, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reported in AOCI, to the extent they are effective at offsetting changes in the hedged item. Any derivative gains or losses reported in AOCI are reclassified to earnings when the forecasted item is included in earnings, or earlier, if it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur. For cash flow hedge transactions, hedge accounting is discontinued if the occurrence of the forecasted transaction is no longer probable.

Fair Value Hedges—Dominion and Virginia Power also useuses fair value hedges to mitigate the fixed price exposure inherent in certain firm commodity commitments and commodity inventory. In addition, theyDominion and Virginia Power have designated interest rate swaps as fair value hedges on certain fixed-ratefixed rate long-term debt to manage interest rate exposure. For fair value hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative are generally offset currently in earnings by the recognition of changes in the hedged item’s fair value. Derivative gains and losses from the hedged item are reclassified to earnings when the hedged item is included in earnings, or earlier, if the hedged item no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Hedge accounting is discontinued if the hedged item no longer qualifies for hedge accounting.

See Note 76 for further information about fair value measurements and associated valuation methods for derivatives. See Note 87 for further information on derivatives.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, including additions and replacements is recorded at original cost, consisting of labor and materials and other direct and indirect costs such as asset retirement costs, capitalized interest and, for certain operations subject to cost-of-service rate regulation, AFUDC and overhead costs. The cost of repairs and maintenance, including minor additions and replacements, is charged to expense as it is incurred.

In 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, Dominion capitalized interest costs and AFUDC to property, plant and equipment of $102$91 million, $76$85 million and $88$102 million, respectively. In 2010, 20092012, 2011 and

 

 

71

69

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

 

 

2008,2010, Virginia Power capitalized interest costs and AFUDC to property, plant and equipment of $61$31 million, $47$31 million and $21$61 million, respectively. Under current Virginia legislation,law, certain Virginia jurisdictional projects qualify for current recovery of AFUDC through rate adjustment clauses. AFUDC on these projects is calculated and recorded as a regulatory asset and is not capitalized to property, plant and equipment. In 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, Virginia Power recorded $13$37 million, $34$20 million and $18$13 million of AFUDC related to these projects, respectively.

For Virginia Power property subject to cost-of-service rate regulation, including electric distribution, electric transmission, and generation property and for certain Dominion natural gas property, the undepreciated cost of such property, less salvage value, is generally charged to accumulated depreciation at retirement, with gains and losses recorded on the sales of property.retirement. Cost of removal collections from utility customers not representing AROs are recorded as regulatory liabilities. For property subject to cost-of-service rate regulation that will be retired or abandoned significantly before the end of its useful life, the net carrying value is reclassified from plant-in-service when it becomes probable it will be retired or abandoned.

For Dominion and Virginia Power property that is not subject to cost-of-service rate regulation, including nonutility property, cost of removal not associated with AROs is charged to expense as incurred. The Companies also record gains and losses upon retirement based upon the difference between the proceeds received, if any, and the property’s net book value at the retirement date.

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed on the straight-line method based on projected service lives. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s depreciation rates on utility property, plant and equipment are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010   2009   2008   2012   2011   2010 
(percent)                        

Dominion

            

Generation

   2.59     2.62     2.60     2.62     2.68     2.59  

Transmission

   2.24     2.27     2.22     2.17     2.26     2.24  

Distribution

   3.20     3.21     3.22     3.17     3.19     3.20  

Storage

   2.75     2.83     2.87     2.59     2.64     2.75  

Gas gathering and processing

   2.39     2.18     2.13     2.49     2.52     2.39  

General and other

   4.60     4.33     4.35     4.55     4.66     4.60  

Virginia Power

            

Generation

   2.59     2.62     2.60     2.62     2.68     2.59  

Transmission

   1.94     1.92     2.03     1.98     2.03     1.94  

Distribution

   3.33     3.33     3.37     3.32     3.33     3.33  

General and other

   4.28     3.95     3.97     4.32     4.38     4.28  

Dominion’s nonutility property, plant and equipment excluding E&P properties, is depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

 

Asset  Estimated Useful Lives 

Merchant generation—nuclear

   29–34 – 44 years  

Merchant generation—other

   8–27 – 40 years  

General and other

   3–255 – 59 years  

Nuclear fuel used in electric generation is amortized over its estimated service life on a units-of-production basis. Dominion and Virginia Power report the amortization of nuclear fuel in electric fuel and other energy-related purchases expense in their Consolidated Statements of Income and in depreciation and amortization in their Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Dominion follows the full cost method of accounting for its gas and oil E&P activities, which subjects capitalized costs to a

quarterly ceiling test using hedge-adjusted prices. Due to the April 2010 sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations, as of December 31, 2010, Dominion no longer has any significant gas and oil properties subject to the ceiling test calculation.

At March 31,In 2010, Dominion recorded a ceiling test impairment charge of $21 million ($13 million after-tax) in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income primarily due to a decline in hedge-adjusted prices reflecting the discontinuance of hedge accounting for certain cash flow hedges as discussed in Note 4.

In 2009, Dominion recorded a ceiling test impairment charge of $455 million ($281 million after-tax) in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income. Excluding the effects of hedge-adjusted prices in calculating the ceiling limitation, the impairment would have been $631 million ($387 million after-tax).

In 2010, Dominion recognized a gain from the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations, as discussed in Note 4.3.

Emissions Allowances

Emissions allowances permit the holder of the allowance to emit certain gaseous by-products of fossil fuel combustion, including SO2, NOX and CO2. SO2 and NOX emissions allowances are issued to Dominion and Virginia Power by the EPA and may also be purchased and sold via third party contracts. CO2 emissions allowances are available for purchase by Dominion through quarterly auctions held by participating RGGI states. The first RGGI auctions of CO2 allowances were conducted in 2008 to be used for the compliance period beginning in 2009 and extending through 2011. Compliance with the RGGI requirements only applies to certain of Dominion’s merchant power stations located in the Northeast.

Allowances held may be transacted with third parties or consumed as these emissions are generated. Allowances allocated to or acquired by the Companies’ generation operations are held primarily for consumption.

Allowances held for consumption are classified as intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Carrying amounts are based on the cost to acquire the allowances or, in the case of a business combination, on the fair values assigned to them in the allocation of the purchase price of the acquired business. A portion of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s SO2 and NOX allowances are issued by the EPA at zero cost.

These allowances are amortized in the periods the emissions are generated, with the amortization reflected in DD&Adepreciation, depletion and amortization in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Purchases and sales of these allowances are reported as investing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and gains or losses resulting from sales are reported in other operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 6 for discussion of impairments related to emissions allowances.

Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

Dominion and Virginia Power perform an evaluation for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets or intangible assets with finite lives may not be recoverable. A long-lived or intangible asset is written down to fair value if the sum of its expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than its carrying amount. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. See Note 6 for a discussion of impairments related to certain long-lived assets and intangible assets with finite lives.

 

 

7270    

 


 

 

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. See Note 7 for a discussion of impairments related to certain long-lived assets.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

The accounting for Dominion’s regulated gas and Virginia Power’s regulated electric operations differs from the accounting for nonregulated operations in that they are required to reflect the effect of rate regulation in their Consolidated Financial Statements. For regulated businesses subject to federal or state cost-of-service rate regulation, regulatory practices that assign costs to accounting periods may differ from accounting methods generally applied by nonregulated companies. When it is probable that regulators will permit the recovery of current costs through future rates charged to customers, these costs that otherwise would be expensed by nonregulated companies are deferred as regulatory assets. Likewise, regulatory liabilities are recognized when it is probable that regulators will require customer refunds through future rates or when revenue is collected from customers for expenditures that have yet to be incurred. Generally, regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized into income over the period authorized by the regulator.

The Companies evaluate whether or not recovery of their regulatory assets through future rates is probable and make various assumptions in their analyses. The expectations of future recovery are generally based on orders issued by regulatory commissions or historical experience, as well as discussions with applicable regulatory authorities. If recovery of a regulatory asset is determined to be less than probable, it will be written off in the period such assessment is made.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Dominion and Virginia Power recognize AROs at fair value as incurred or when sufficient information becomes available to determine a reasonable estimate of the fair value of future retirement activities to be performed. These amounts are generally capitalized as costs of the related tangible long-lived assets. Since relevant market information is not available, fair value is

estimated using discounted cash flow analyses. Virginia PowerDominion reports accretion of the AROs associated with nuclear decommissioning of its nuclear power stations due to the passage of timenatural gas pipeline and storage well assets as an adjustment to the related regulatory liabilities when revenue is recoverable from customers for AROs. Virginia Power reports accretion of AROs associated with decommissioning its nuclear power stations as an adjustment to the regulatory liability for certain jurisdictions, consistent with the practice for its other cost-of-service rate regulated operations. Dominion and Virginia Power report accretionjurisdictions. Accretion of all other AROs is reported in other operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

Dominion and Virginia Power defer and amortize debt issuance costs and debt premiums or discounts over the expected lives of the respective debt issues, considering maturity dates and, if applicable, redemption rights held by others. As permitted by regulatory authorities, gains or losses resulting from the refinancing of debt allocable to utility operations subject to cost-based rate regulation have also beenare deferred and are amortized over the lives of the new issuances.

Investments

MARKETABLE EQUITYAND DEBT SECURITIES

Dominion accounts for and classifies investments in marketable equity and debt securities as trading or available-for-sale securities.

Virginia Power classifies investments in marketable equity and debt securities as available-for-sale securities.

Ÿ 

Trading securitiesinclude marketable equity and debt securities held by Dominion in rabbi trusts associated with certain deferred compensation plans. These securities are reported in other investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair

value with net realized and unrealized gains and losses included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Ÿ 

Available-for-sale securitiesinclude all other marketable equity and debt securities, primarily comprised of securities held in the nuclear decommissioning trusts. These investments are reported at fair value in nuclear decommissioning trust funds in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses (including any other-than-temporary impairments) on investments held in Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning trusts are recorded to a regulatory liability for certain jurisdictions subject to cost-based regulation. For all other available-for-sale securities, including those held in Dominion’s merchant generation nuclear decommissioning trusts, net realized gains and losses (including any other-than-temporary impairments) are included in other income and unrealized gains and losses are reported as a component of AOCI, net of tax.after-tax.

In determining realized gains and losses for marketable equity and debt securities, the cost basis of the security is based on the specific identification method.

NON-M-ARKETABLEMARKETABLE INVESTMENTS

Dominion and Virginia Power account for illiquid and privately held securities for which market prices or quotations are not readily available under either the equity or cost method. Non-marketable investments include:

Ÿ 

Equity method investmentswhen Dominion and Virginia Power have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee. Dominion’s investments are included in investments in equity method affiliates and Virginia Power’s investments are included in other investments in their Consolidated Balance Sheets. Dominion and Virginia Power record equity method adjustments in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income including: their proportionate share of investee income or loss, gains or losses resulting from investee capital transactions, amortization of certain differences between the carrying value and the equity in the net assets of the investee at the date of investment and other adjustments required by the equity method.

Ÿ 

Cost method investments when Dominion and Virginia Power do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s investments are included in other investments and nuclear decommissioning trust funds.

71


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENT

Dominion and Virginia Power periodically review their investments to determine whether a decline in fair value should be considered other than temporary.other-than-temporary. If a decline in fair value of any security is determined to be other than temporary,other-than-temporary, the security is written down to its fair value at the end of the reporting period.

Decommissioning Trust Investments—Special Considerations

Ÿ 

Debt Securities—The FASB amended its guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, which Dominion and Virginia Power adopted effective April 1, 2009. The recognition provisions of this

73


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

the FASB’s other-than-temporary impairment guidance apply only to debt securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity, while the presentation and disclosure requirements apply to both debt and equity securities. Prior to the adoption of this guidance,

Ÿ

Debt Securities—Using information obtained from their nuclear decommissioning trust fixed-income investment managers, Dominion and Virginia Power considered allrecord in earnings any unrealized loss for a debt securities heldsecurity when the manager intends to sell the debt security or it is more-likely-than-not that the manager will have to sell the debt security before recovery of its fair value up to its cost basis. If that is not the case, but the debt security is deemed to have experienced a credit loss, the Companies record the credit loss in earnings and any remaining portion of the unrealized loss in other comprehensive income. Credit losses are evaluated primarily by their nuclear decommissioning trusts with market values below their cost bases to be other-than-temporarily impaired as they did not haveconsidering the ability to ensurecredit ratings of the investments were held throughissuer, prior instances of non-performance by the anticipated recovery period.issuer and other factors.

  Effective with the adoption of this guidance, using information obtained from their nuclear decommissioning trust fixed-income investment managers, Dominion and Virginia Power record in earnings any unrealized loss for a debt security when the manager intends to sell the debt security or it is more-likely-than-not that the manager will have to sell the debt security before recovery of its fair value up to its cost basis. If that is the case, but the debt security is deemed to have experienced a credit loss, the Companies record the credit loss in earnings and any remaining portion of the unrealized loss in other comprehensive income. Credit losses are evaluated primarily by considering the credit ratings of the issuer, prior instances of non-performance by the issuer and other factors.

Ÿ 

Equity securities and other investments—Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s method of assessing other-than-temporary declines requires demonstrating the ability to hold individual securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for the anticipated recovery in their market value prior to the consideration of the other criteria mentioned above. Since the Companies have limited ability to oversee the day-to-day management of nuclear decommissioning trust fund investments, they do not have the ability to ensure investments are held through an anticipated recovery period. Accordingly, they consider all equity and other securities as well as non-marketable investments held in nuclear decommissioning trusts with market values below their cost bases to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Inventories

Materials and supplies and fossil fuel inventories are valued primarily using the weighted-average cost method. Stored gas inventory used in Dominion’sEast Ohio gas distribution operations is valued using the LIFO method. Under the LIFO method, stored gas inventory was valued at $48$24 million and $30$48 million at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,December 31, 2011, respectively. Based on the average price of gas purchased during 20102012 and 2009,2011, the cost of replacing the current portion of stored gas inventory exceeded the amount stated on a LIFO basis by approximately $107$69 million and $172$86 million, respectively. Stored gas inventory held by Hope and certain nonregulated gas operations is valued using the weighted-average cost method.

Gas Imbalances

Natural gas imbalances occur when the physical amount of natural gas delivered from, or received by, a pipeline system or storage facility differs from the contractual amount of natural gas delivered or received. Dominion values these imbalances due to, or

from, shippers and operators at an appropriate index price at period end, subject to the terms of its tariff for regulated entities.

Imbalances are primarily settled in-kind. Imbalances due to Dominion from other parties are reported in other current assets and imbalances that Dominion owes to other parties are reported in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Goodwill

Dominion evaluates goodwill for impairment annually as of April 1 and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change in the interim that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

 

 

NOTE 3. NDEWLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDSISPOSITIONS

2009Sale of Salem Harbor and State Line

NONCONTROLLING INTERESTSIN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIn August 2012, Dominion completed the sale of Salem Harbor. In the second quarter of 2012, the assets and liabilities to be disposed were classified as held for sale and adjusted to their estimated fair value less cost to sell. During the second quarter of 2012, Dominion completed the sale of State Line, which ceased operations in March 2012. See Note 6 for impairments related to these power stations.

Effective January 1, 2009, Dominion adopted new accounting guidance for noncontrolling interests that requires retrospective applicationThe following table presents selected information regarding the results of presentationoperations of Salem Harbor and disclosure changes including that noncontrolling interests be reported as a component of equity and that net income attributable to the parent and noncontrolling interests be separately identifiedState Line, which are classified in the income statement.

As discussed in Note 25, Dominion previously consolidated an investment in the subordinated notes of a third-party CDO entity held by DCI, which was deconsolidated as of March 31, 2008. The noncontrolling interest income from the CDO entity was previously reported in minority interestdiscontinued operations in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income and in operating activities in its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Dominion’s subsidiary preferred dividends were previously included in interest and related charges in its Consolidated Statements of Income and in operating activities in its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Due to the application of new accounting guidance for noncontrolling interests, Dominion now reflects its interest in the previously held CDO entity’s income and its subsidiary preferred dividends as an adjustment (noncontrolling interests) to arrive at net income attributable to Dominion in its Consolidated Statements of Income and reflects its subsidiary preferred dividends in financing activities in its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Since Dominion’s subsidiary preferred stock does not qualify as permanent equity, Dominion continues to report these amounts as mezzanine equity in its Consolidated Balance Sheets.

RECOGNITIONAND PRESENTATIONOF OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS

The FASB amended its guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, which Dominion and Virginia Power adopted effective April 1, 2009. The recognition provisions of this guidance apply only to debt securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity, while the presentation and disclosure requirements apply to both debt and equity securities. Prior to the adoption of this guidance, as described in Note 2, the Companies considered all debt securities held by their nuclear decommissioning trusts with market values below their cost bases to be other-than-temporarily impaired as they did not have the ability to ensure the investments were held through the anticipated recovery period.

74


Income:

 

Upon the adoption of this guidance for debt investments held at April 1, 2009, Dominion recorded a $20 million ($12 million after-tax) and Virginia Power recorded a $3 million ($2 million after-tax) cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle to reclassify the non-credit related portion of previously recognized other-than-temporary impairments from retained earnings to AOCI, reflecting the fixed-income investment managers’ intent and ability to hold the debt securities until recovery of their fair values up to their cost bases.

SEC FINAL RULE,MODERNIZATIONOF OILAND GAS REPORTING

Effective December 31, 2009, Dominion adopted the SEC Final Rule,Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, which revised the existing Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X reporting requirements. Under the new requirements, the ceiling test is calculated using an average price based on the prior 12-month period rather than period-end prices. Due to the April 2010 sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations, as of December 31, 2010 Dominion no longer has any significant gas and oil properties subject to the ceiling test calculation.

2008

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Dominion and Virginia Power adopted new FASB guidance effective January 1, 2008, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures related to fair value measurements. The guidance applies broadly to financial and non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value under other authoritative accounting pronouncements, but does not expand the application of fair value accounting to any new circumstances.

Generally, the provisions of this guidance were applied prospectively. Certain situations, however, required retrospective application as of the beginning of the year of adoption through the recognition of a cumulative effect of accounting change. Such retrospective application was required for financial instruments, including derivatives and certain hybrid instruments with limitations on initial gains or losses. Retrospective application resulted in an immaterial amount recognized through a cumulative effect of accounting change adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2008 for Dominion and no adjustment for Virginia Power.

See Note 7 for further information on fair value measurements.

ENDORSEMENT SPLIT-DOLLAR LIFE INSURANCE ARRANGEMENTS

Effective January 1, 2008, Dominion adopted new accounting guidance for deferred compensation and postretirement benefit aspects of endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements. This guidance specifies that if an employer provides a benefit to an employee under the endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement that extends to post-retirement periods, it should recognize a liability for future benefits based on the substantive agreement with the employee. Dominion’s adoption of this guid-

ance resulted in an immaterial amount recognized through a cumulative effect of accounting change adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2008.

Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Operating revenue

  $57   $233   $269  

Loss before income taxes(1)

   (49  (34  (158

 

NOTE 4. DISPOSITIONS

(1)Includes long-lived asset impairment charges of $55 million and $194 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Sale of Appalachian E&P Operations

In April 2010, Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations to a newly-formed subsidiary of CONSOL for approximately $3.5 billion. The transaction includesincluded the mineral rights to approximately 491,000 acres in the Marcellus Shale formation. Dominion retained certain oil and natural gas wells located on or near its natural gas storage fields. The transaction generated after-tax proceeds of approximately $2.2 billion and resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $1.4 billion, which includes a $134 million write-off of goodwill. Proceeds fromgoodwill, recorded in the sale have been or will be used to pay taxes on the gain, offset allsecond quarter of Dominion’s equity needs for 2010 and its expected market equity issuance needs for 2011, repurchase common stock, fund contributions to Dominion’s pension plans and the Dominion Foundation, reduce debt and offset the majority of the impact of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case settlement.2010.

The results of operations for Dominion’s Appalachian E&P business are not reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income since Dominion did not sell its entire U.S. cost pool.

Due to the sale, hedge accounting was discontinued for certain cash flow hedges since it became probable that the forecasted sales of gas would not occur. In connection with the discontinuance of hedge accounting for these contracts, Dominion recognized a $42 million ($25 million after-tax) benefit, recorded in operating revenue in its Consolidated Statement of Income, reflecting the reclassification of gains from AOCI to earnings for these contracts in March 2010.

72


Sale of Peoples

In February 2010, Dominion completed the sale of Peoples to PNG Companies LLC and netted after-tax proceeds of approximately $542 million. The sale resulted in an after-tax loss of approximately $140 million, including post-closing adjustments, and a $79 million write-off of goodwill. The sale also resulted in after-tax expenses of approximately $27 million, including transaction and benefit-related costs. Prior to the sale, Peoples had income from operations of $12 million after-tax during 2010.

Prior to March 31, 2010, Dominion did not report Peoples as discontinued operations since it expected to have significant continuing cash flows related primarily to the sale of natural gas production from its Appalachian E&P operations to Peoples. Due to the sale of its Appalachian E&P operations, Dominion will not have significant continuing cash flows with Peoples; therefore, the results of Peoples were reclassified to discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented. Certain 2009 and 2008 amounts have been recast to reflect Peoples as discontinued operations.

75


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:

At December 31,  2009 
(millions)    

ASSETS

  

Current Assets

  

Customer receivables

  $87  

Other

   56  

Total current assets

   143  

Property, Plant and Equipment

  

Property, plant and equipment

   985  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (284

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   701  

Deferred Charges and Other Assets

  

Regulatory assets

   125  

Other

   49  

Total deferred charges and other assets

   174  

Assets held for sale

  $1,018  

LIABILITIES

  

Current Liabilities

  $133  

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities

  

Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits

   238  

Other

   57  

Total deferred credits and other liabilities

   295  

Liabilities held for sale

  $428  

The following table presents selected information regarding the results of operations of Peoples, which are reported as discontinued operations in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009   2008   2010 
(millions)              

Operating revenue

  $67   $432    $535    $67  

Income (loss) before income taxes(1)

   (134)(2)   42     119  
          

Loss before income taxes

   (134)(1) 

(1)The year ended December 31, 2008 includes a $47 million benefit related to the re-establishment of certain regulatory assets expected to be recovered through future rates under the terms of the sale agreement. The year ended December 31, 2009 includes the impact of a $22 million charge due to a reduction of the previously established regulatory asset.
(2)Includes a loss and other charges related to the sale of Peoples.

 

NOTE 5.4. OPERATING REVENUE

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s operating revenue consists of the following:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010   2009   2008   2012   2011   2010 
(millions)                        

Dominion

            

Electric sales:

            

Regulated

  $7,123    $6,477    $6,797    $7,102    $7,114    $7,123  

Nonregulated

   3,829     3,802     3,543     2,742     3,100     3,559  

Gas sales:

            

Regulated

   308     494     877     250     287     308  

Nonregulated

   2,010     2,315     3,114     1,071     1,635     2,010  

Gas transportation and storage

   1,493     1,268     1,072     1,401     1,506     1,493  

Other

   434     442     492     527     503     434  

Total operating revenue

  $15,197    $14,798    $15,895    $13,093    $14,145    $14,927  

Virginia Power

            

Regulated electric sales

  $7,123    $6,477    $6,797    $7,102    $7,114    $7,123  

Other

   96     107     137     124     132     96  

Total operating revenue

  $7,219    $6,584    $6,934    $7,226    $7,246    $7,219  

 

 

NOTE 6.5. INCOME TAXES

Judgment and the use of estimates are required in developing the provision for income taxes and reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities. The interpretation of tax laws involves uncertainty, since tax authorities may interpret the laws differently. Dominion and Virginia Power are routinely audited by federal and state tax authorities. Ultimate resolution of income tax matters may result in favorable or unfavorable impacts to net income and cash flows, and adjustments to tax-related assets and liabilities could be material.

In 2010,On January 2, 2013, U.S. federal legislation was enacted that allows taxpayers to fully deduct qualifying capital expenditures incurred after September 8, 2010, through the end of 2011, when placed in service before 2013, and otherwise provides an extension of the fifty50 percent bonus depreciation allowance for qualifying capital expenditures incurred through 2013.

In December 2011, the IRS issued temporary regulations that provide guidance to taxpayers on the treatment of amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property and of dispositions of such property, including whether expenditures should be deducted as repairs or capitalized and depreciated on tax returns. Upon issuance, the temporary regulations were generally to be effective for expenditures made on or after January 1, 2012. However, there is uncertainty aboutin December 2012, in response to public comments received, the earliestIRS amended the temporary regulations to postpone the effective date on which construction of propertyuntil January 1, 2014.

Changes in tax treatment elected by Dominion or for a taxpayer could have begun in order to qualify forrequired by the full deduction of qualifying capital expenditures. Clarifying guidance is expected from the U.S. Treasury Department in 2011. For Dominion and Virginia Power,regulations will impact income taxes payable, have been reducedcash flows from operations and deferred tax liabilities have increased in 2010 as a resulttaxes. Except to the extent the implementation impacts deferred taxes and, therefore, the rate base used to establish customer rates for regulated utilities, results of claiming these benefits.operations are not expected to be materially affected.

76


Continuing Operations

Details of income tax expense for continuing operations including noncontrolling interests were as follows:

 

 Dominion Virginia Power   Dominion(1) Virginia Power(2) 
Year Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 
(millions)                           

Current:

             

Federal

 $891   $952   $502   $(78 $465   $158    $(117 $3   $894   $70   $(35 $(78

State

  308    129    115    10    91    37     80    9    309    81    79    10  

Total current

  1,199    1,081    617    (68  556    195  

Total current expense (benefit)

   (37  12    1,203    151    44    (68

Deferred:

             

Federal

  764    (424  338    537    (339  279     214    694    818    482    484    537  

State

  96    (59  3    74    (69  30     (30  50    93    21    13    74  

Total deferred

  860    (483  341    611    (408  309  

Total deferred expense

   184    744    911    503    497    611  

Amortization of deferred investment tax credits

  (2  (2  (5  (1  (1  (4   (1  (2  (2  (1  (1  (1

Total income tax expense

 $2,057   $596   $953   $542   $147   $500    $146   $754   $2,112   $653   $540   $542  

(1)In 2012, Dominion’s current federal income tax benefit includes a benefit related to the carryback of its current year operating loss, and deferred state income tax benefit reflects the impact of Brayton Point, Kincaid and Kewaunee impairment charges. In 2011, Dominion’s federal income tax expense includes a benefit related to its current year operating loss that is expected to be used in future years, and state income tax expense reflects changes in the amount of income apportioned among states, higher tax credits, claims for refunds and previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of statutes of limitations.
(2)In 2011, Virginia Power’s federal income tax expense includes a benefit related to a portion of its current year operating loss that is expected to be used in future years. Also, in 2011 and 2010, Virginia Power’s federal income tax expense reflects the amounts of current year operating losses realized through its participation in a tax sharing agreement with Dominion and its subsidiaries.

73


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

For continuing operations including noncontrolling interests, the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate reconciles to Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s effective income tax rate as follows:

 

  Dominion Virginia Power   Dominion Virginia Power 
Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 

U.S. statutory rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0   35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0

Increases (reductions) resulting from:

              

Goodwill—sale of U.S. Appalachian E&P business

   0.9                      

Legislative change

   1.1    0.4    (0.1  1.1        (0.4

State taxes, net of federal benefit

   5.0    2.4    2.5    3.8    2.8    3.6     8.1    1.8    5.1    3.9    4.4    3.8  

Valuation allowances

   0.1    (0.4  0.5                 (1.5      (0.2            

Domestic production activities deduction

   (0.4  (2.9  (0.5  (0.3  (4.5  (0.5

Investment and production tax credits

   (0.3  (1.5  (0.1      (0.2  (0.1

Production tax credits

   (2.4  (0.6  (0.3            

Amortization of investment tax credits

       (0.1  (0.2  (0.1  (0.2  (0.3   (0.3  (0.1      (0.1  (0.1  (0.1

AFUDC – equity

   (0.4  (1.0  (0.3  (1.1  (3.4  (0.5

AFUDC—equity

   (4.1  (0.6  (0.4  (0.9  (0.8  (1.1

Employee stock ownership plan deduction

   (0.3  (0.8  (0.5               (3.1  (0.7  (0.3            

Pension and other benefits

       (0.6  (0.3      (0.6  (0.2

Goodwill

   0.4        0.9              

Legislative change

           1.1            1.1  

Other, net

   0.1    1.3    0.5    0.5    0.4    0.1     (2.8  (0.6  (0.2  0.4    1.2    0.2 

Effective tax rate

   40.8  31.8  36.5  38.9  29.3  36.7   29.3  34.2  40.7  38.3  39.7  38.9

Dominion’s effective tax rate in 2012 reflects the amplified effect of permanent differences due to lower pre-tax income, as well as the state tax impact of Brayton Point, Kincaid and Kewaunee impairment charges. The rate also reflects a $20 million reduction of a valuation allowance related to state operating loss carryforwards attributable to Fairless and a $14 million increase in valuation allowance related to Brayton Point state credit carryforwards. After considering the results of Fairless’ operations in recent years and a forecast of future operating results reflecting Dominion’s planned purchase of the facility, Dominion has concluded that it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of the operating losses will be realized. Significant assumptions include future commodity prices, in particular, those for electric energy produced by Fairless and those for natural gas, as compared to other fuels used for the generation of electricity, which will significantly influence the extent to which Fairless is dispatched by PJM. Also, in connection with its intention to sell Brayton Point, Dominion evaluated state tax credits previously recognized for the power station and recorded a $14 million increase in valuation allowance related to credit carryforwards and a $14 million deferred tax liability, representing recapture of credits claimed in prior years that would result upon completion of a sale. Dominion will continue to evaluate the likelihood of realizing these tax benefits on a quarterly basis.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s effective tax rates in 2010 reflect reductions of deferred tax assets of $57 million and $17 million, respectively, resulting from the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, which eliminated the employer’s deduction, beginning in 2013, for that portion of its retiree prescription drug coverage cost that is being reimbursed by the Medicare Part D subsidy. In addition, Dominion’s effective tax rate in 2010 includes higher state income taxes and the impact of goodwill written off that is not deductible for tax purposes associated with the sale of the Appalachian E&P operations.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s effective tax rates in 2009 reflect the reduction of uncertainties regarding the calculation of the domestic production activities deduction as a result of working with the IRS under its Pre-Filing Program. The objective of the Pre-Filing Program is to provide taxpayers with greater certainty regarding a specific issue at an earlier point in time than can be attained under the normal post-filing examination process.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

The Companies’ deferred income taxes consist of the following:

 

  Dominion Virginia Power   Dominion Virginia Power 
At December 31,  2010 2009 2010 2009   2012 2011 2012 2011 
(millions)                    

Deferred income taxes:

          

Total deferred income tax assets

  $1,642   $1,839   $402   $533    $2,505   $2,229   $466   $503  

Total deferred income tax liabilities

   6,233    5,683    3,139    2,652     7,716    7,424    4,238    3,759  

Total net deferred income tax liabilities

  $4,591   $3,844   $2,737   $2,119    $5,211   $5,195   $3,772   $3,256  

Total deferred income taxes:

          

Plant and equipment, primarily depreciation method and basis differences

  $3,027   $2,877   $2,109   $1,934    $4,601   $4,008   $3,394   $2,758  

Nuclear decommissioning

   749    689    343    307     994    913    407    374  

Deferred state income taxes

   446    416    228    152     474    493    265    243  

Federal benefit of deferred state income taxes

   (166)  (173)  (93)  (85)

Deferred fuel, purchased energy and gas costs

   120    12    111    7     3    161    (16)  144  

Pension benefits

   521    351    26    (49   231    396    (17)  8  

Other postretirement benefits

   (186  (216  (14  (29   (171  (167  (7  (13

Loss and credit carryforwards

   (181  (192           (656  (577  (77  (55

Reserve for rate proceedings

   (56  (179  (56  (179       (54)      (54

Partnership basis differences

   265    236             174    274          

Valuation allowances

   68    62             93    96          

Other

   (182  (212  (10  (24   (366)  (175)  (84  (64

Total net deferred income tax liabilities

  $4,591   $3,844   $2,737   $2,119    $5,211   $5,195   $3,772   $3,256  

At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had the following deductible loss and credit carryforwards:

Ÿ 

Federal loss carryforwards of $38 million$1.1 billion that expire if unutilized during the period 20142021 through 2021;2031;

Ÿ

Federal production tax credits of $26 million that expire if unutilized through 2032;

Ÿ 

State loss carryforwards of $840 million$1.4 billion that expire if unutilized during the period 20112014 through 2030.2032. A valuation allowance on $701$857 million of these carryforwards has been established; and

Ÿ 

State minimum tax credits of $94$96 million that do not expire.expire; and

Ÿ

State investment tax credits of $28 million that expire if unutilized through 2016. A valuation allowance on $21 million of these credits has been established for credits that are not expected to be utilized.

There were no loss or credit carryforwards forAt December 31, 2012, Virginia Power at December 31, 2010.had federal loss carryforwards of $220 million that expire if unutilized through 2031.

Positions taken by an entity in its income tax returns that are recognized in the financial statements must satisfy a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, assuming that the position will be examined by tax authorities with full knowledge of all relevant information. The amount of tax return positions that are not recognized in the financial statements is disclosed as unrecognized tax benefits. These unrecognized tax benefits may impact the financial statements by increasing income taxes payable, reducing

 

 

74   77

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

financial statements by increasing income taxes payable, reducing tax refunds receivable or changing deferred taxes. Also, when uncertainty about the deductibility of an amount is limited to the timing of such deductibility, thean increase in taxes payable (or reduction in tax refunds receivable) is accompanied by a decrease in deferred tax liabilities.

A reconciliation of changes in the Companies’ unrecognized tax benefits follows:

 

 Dominion Virginia Power  Dominion Virginia Power 
 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008  2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 
(millions)                          

Balance at January 1

 $291   $404   $407   $121   $180   $195   $347   $307   $291   $114   $117   $121  

Increases—prior period positions

  34    51    42    4    11    20    28    127    34    4    22    4  

Decreases—prior period positions

  (59  (142  (54  (28  (71  (22  (106  (119  (75  (80)  (51  (33

Current period positions

  61    43    63    25    22    20  

Prior period positions becoming otherwise deductible in current period

  (16  (36  (21  (5  (9  (11

Increases—current period positions

  43    64    61    24    47    25  

Decreases—current period positions

      (21          (21    

Settlements with tax authorities

      (13  (33      (9  (22  (4          (4        

Expiration of statutes of limitation

  (4  (16          (3      (15  (11  (4  (1)        

Balance at December 31

 $307   $291   $404   $117   $121   $180   $293   $347   $307   $57   $114   $117  

Certain unrecognized tax benefits, or portions thereof, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. Changes in these unrecognized tax benefits may result from claims for tax benefits, or portions thereof, that may not be realized, remeasurement of amounts expected to be realized, settlements with tax authorities and expiration of statutes of limitation. For Dominion and its subsidiaries, these unrecognized tax benefits were $133$167 million, $95$184 million and $121$133 million at December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, respectively. For Dominion, the change in these unrecognized tax benefits increased income tax expense by $1 million, $51 million and $38 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, decreased income tax expense by $26 million in 2009 and increased tax expense by $25 million in 2008.respectively. For Virginia Power, these unrecognized tax benefits were $14$13 million, $14$20 million and $21$14 million at December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, respectively. For Virginia Power, the change in these unrecognized tax benefits increased income tax expense by $1 million, $6 million and by less than $1 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, decreased income tax expense by $7 million in 2009 and increased income tax expense by $13 million in 2008.respectively.

A substantial amount of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s unrecognized tax benefits balances at December 31, 2010 represents tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain; however, there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. When uncertainty about the deductibility of amounts is limited to the timing of such deductibility, any tax liabilities recognized for prior periods would be subject to offset with the availability of refundable amounts from later periods when such deductions could otherwise be taken. Some prior year unrecognized tax benefits had involved uncertainty as to whether the amounts were deductible as ordinary deductions or capital losses. Pending resolution of these uncertainties, interest is accrued until the period in which the amounts would become deductible.

For Dominion and its subsidiaries, the U.S. federal statute of limitations has expired for years prior to 2004, except that2008. For prior years, Dominion had reserved the right to pursue refunds related to certain deductions has been reservedthe calculation of interest to be capitalized in connection with improvements to in-service plant and equipment for the years 1995 through 2003.2007. The IRS position had provided that capitalized interest must also be computed on the adjusted tax basis of in-service assets that are idled while making improvements to them. In response to litigation initiated by Dominion in March 2008, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled in February 2011, sustaining the IRS position. In July 2011, Dominion filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and, in May 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of Dominion. The resolution of this matter did not have a material impact on the Companies’ cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

In 2010, the IRS began its examination of Dominion’s consolidated tax returns for tax years 2006 and 2007, and Dominion began settlement negotiations with the Appellate Division of the IRS regarding adjustments proposed in the examination of its consolidated tax returns for 2004 and 2005. Other than two tax positions for which Dominion will reserve the right to litigate and pursue claims for refunds, Dominion and the IRS have agreed on the resolution of the issues for 2004 and 2005. The settlement is subject to review by the Joint Committee.

In September 2010,January 2012, the Appellate Division of the IRS informed Dominion that the Joint Committee had approvedcompleted its review of the settlement of tax years 20022004 and 20032005 for Dominion and its

consolidated subsidiaries. Dominion received a refundSince the measurement of $54 millionunrecognized tax benefits in November 2010. The2011 considered the results of completed settlement excludes two issues, for which Dominion has reserved the right to litigate and pursue claims for refunds.negotiations, Dominion’s results of operations in 2012 were not affected.

In 2009,April 2012, the Joint Committee completedIRS issued its review ofRevenue Agent Report for Dominion’s settlement with the Appellate Division of the IRSconsolidated tax returns for tax years 1999 through 2001. Dominion2006 and 2007, reflecting the resolution of all issues, except the capitalized interest on idle property issue that was entitledin litigation at that time but later resolved as discussed above.

The IRS examination of tax years 2008, 2009 and 2010 began in the first quarter of 2012 and was later expanded to a $60 million refund,include examination of which $20 million was applied as an estimated payment for 2009 taxes and $40 million was paidthe 2011 tax year. The audit is expected to Dominionbe concluded in October 2009. In addition, Dominion received a $5 million refund for 1998 due to loss carryback adjustments. Virginia Power was entitled to a $39 million refund, of which $20 million was applied as an estimated payment for 2009 taxes and $19 million was paid to Virginia Power in October 2009. The refunds had no impact on earnings.late 2013.

During examinations by tax authorities in 2011, itIt is reasonably possible that Dominionsettlements with and payments to tax authorities in 2013 and the expiration of statutes of limitations could agree to apply procedures used previously to resolve similar tax return filing positions, reducing Dominion’sreduce unrecognized tax benefits for Dominion and Virginia Power by $50 millionup to $70$65 million and Virginia Power’s unrecognized tax benefits by $30$35 million, to $35 million. Dominion’s unrecognized tax benefits could also be reduced by $15 million, including $5 million for Virginia Power, to recognize prior period amounts becoming otherwise deductible in 2011.respectively. If such changes were to occur, other than revisions of the accrual for interest on tax underpayments and overpayments, Dominion’s earnings could increase by up to $25$10 million, with no material impact onand Virginia Power’s earnings.earnings would not be affected.

Otherwise, with regard to 20102012 and prior years, Dominion and Virginia Power cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible changes to unrecognized tax benefits that may occur in 2011.2013.

For each of the major states in which Dominion operates, the earliest tax year remaining open for examination is as follows:

 

State  

Earliest

Open Tax

Year

 

Pennsylvania

   20072009  

Connecticut

   20072009  

Massachusetts

   20072008  

Virginia(1)

   20072009  

West Virginia

   20072009  

 

(1)Virginia is the only state considered major for Virginia Power’s operations.

78


Dominion and Virginia Power are also obligated to report adjustments resulting from IRS settlements to state tax authorities. In addition, if Dominion utilizes state net operating losses or tax credits generated in years for which the statute of limitations has expired, such amounts are subject to examination.

Discontinued Operations

IncomeDominion’s effective tax expenserate for 2012 reflects the dispositions of State Line and Salem Harbor.

Dominion’s effective tax rate for 2011 reflects an expectation that State Line’s deferred tax assets, including 2011 operating losses, will not be realized in 2010State Line’s separately filed state tax returns.

Dominion’s effective tax rate for Dominion’s discontinued operations primarily2010 reflects the impact of goodwill written off in the sale of Peoples that is not deductible for tax purposes and the reversal of deferred taxes for which the benefit was offset by the reversal of income tax-related regulatory assets.

Income tax expense in 2008 for Dominion’s discontinued operations reflects the reversal of $120 million of deferred tax liabilities recognized in 2006, associated with the excess of its financial reporting basis over the tax basis in the stock of Peoples. In 2006, based on the terms of a previous agreement to sell Peoples, Dominion recognized these deferred tax liabilities since the difference between the financial reporting basis and its tax basis in the stock of the subsidiaries was expected to reverse upon closing of the sale. In January 2008, Dominion agreed to terminate the agreement for the sale of Peoples and Hope. At that time, based on its expectation that the form of any future disposal of these subsidiaries would be structured so that the taxable gain would instead be determined by reference to the basis in the subsidiaries’ underlying assets, Dominion reversed the related deferred tax liabilities recognized in 2006. Dominion executed a new agreement in July 2008 to sell Peoples and Hope, but decided in December 2009 to sell only Peoples. Dominion determined its taxable gain by reference to the basis in the subsidiary’s underlying assets.

75

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

NOTE 7.6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

As described in Note 3, Dominion and Virginia Power adopted new FASB guidance for fair value measurements effective January 1, 2008. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. However, the use of a mid-market pricing convention (the mid-point between bid and ask prices) is permitted. Fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. This includes not only the credit standing of counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements but also the impact of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s own nonperformance risk on their liabilities. Fair value measurements assume that the transaction occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability (the market with the most volume and activity for the asset or liability from the perspective of the reporting entity), or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability (the market in which the reporting entity would be able to maximize the amount received or minimize the amount paid). Dominion and Virginia Power apply fair value measurements to certain assets and liabilities including commodity and interest rate derivative instruments, and nuclear decommissioning trust and other investments including those held in Dominion’s rabbi, pension

and other postretirement benefit plan trusts, in accordance with the requirements described above. The Companies apply credit adjustments to their derivative fair values in accordance with the requirements described above. These credit adjustments are currently not material to the derivative fair values.

Inputs and Assumptions

The Companies maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value is based on actively-quoted market prices, if available. In the absence of actively-quoted market prices, they seek price information is sought from external sources, including broker quotes and industry publications. When evaluating pricing information provided by brokers and other pricing services, they consider whether the broker is willing and able to trade at the quoted price, if the broker quotes are based on an active market or an inactive market and the extent to which brokers are utilizing a particular model if pricing is not readily available. If pricing information from external sources is not available, or if the Companies believe that observable pricing is not indicative of fair value, judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value. In those cases they must estimate prices based on available historical and near-term future price information and certain statistical methods, including regression analysis, that reflect their market assumptions.

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s commodity derivative valuations are prepared by the ERM department. The ERM department reports directly to the Companies’ CFO. The ERM department creates a daily file containing market valuations for the Companies’ derivative transactions. The inputs that go into the market valuations are transactional information stored in the systems of record and market pricing information that resides in data warehouses. The majority of forward prices are automatically uploaded into the data warehouses from various third-party sources. Inputs obtained from third-party sources are evaluated for

reliability considering the reputation, independence, market presence, and methodology used by the third-party. If forward prices are not available from third-party sources, then the ERM department models the forward prices based on other available market data. A team consisting of risk management and risk quantitative analysts meets each business day to assess the validity of market prices and valuations. During this meeting, the changes in market valuations from period to period are examined and qualified against historical expectations. If any discrepancies are identified during this process, the mark-to-market valuations or the market pricing information is evaluated further and adjusted, if necessary.

For options and contracts with option-like characteristics where observable pricing information is not available from external sources, the Companies generally use a modified Black-Scholes Model that considers time value, the volatility of the underlying commodities and other relevant assumptions when estimating fair value. The Companies use other option models under special circumstances, including a Spread Approximation Model when contracts include different commodities or commodity locations and a Swing Option Model when contracts allow either the buyer or seller the ability to exercise within a range of quantities. For contracts with unique characteristics, the Companies may estimate fair value using a discounted cash flow approach deemed appropriate in the circumstances and applied consistently from period to period. For individual contracts, the use of different valuation models or assumptions could have a significant effect on the contract’s estimated fair value.

The inputs and assumptions used in measuring fair value include the following:

For commodity and foreign currency derivative contracts:

 Ÿ 

Forward commodity prices

 Ÿ 

Forward foreign currency prices

 Ÿ 

Transaction prices

Ÿ

Price volatility

 Ÿ 

Volumes

 Ÿ 

Commodity location

 Ÿ 

Interest rates

 Ÿ 

Credit quality of counterparties and Dominion and Virginia Power

 Ÿ 

Credit enhancements

 Ÿ 

Time value

For interest rate derivative contracts:

 Ÿ 

Interest rate curves

 Ÿ 

Credit quality of counterparties and Dominion and Virginia Power

 Ÿ 

Volumes

Ÿ

Credit enhancements

 Ÿ 

Time value

79


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

For investments:

 Ÿ 

Quoted securities prices and indices

 Ÿ 

Securities trading information including volume and restrictions

 Ÿ 

Maturity

 Ÿ 

Interest rates

 Ÿ 

Credit quality

 Ÿ 

NAV (only for alternative investments)

76


Dominion and Virginia Power regularly evaluate and validate the inputs used to estimate fair value by a number of methods, including review and verification of models, as well as various market price verification procedures such as the use of pricing services and multiple broker quotes to support the market price of the various commodities and investments in which the Companies transact.

Levels

The Companies also utilize the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

Ÿ 

Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that they have the ability to access at the measurement date. Instruments categorized in Level 1 primarily consist of financial instruments such as the majority of exchange-traded derivatives, and exchange-listed equities, mutual funds and certain Treasury securities held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds for Dominion and Virginia Power and rabbi and benefit plan trust funds for Dominion.

Ÿ 

Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived from observable market data by correlation or other means. Instruments categorized in Level 2 primarily include non-exchange traded derivatives such as over-the-counter commodity forwards and swaps, interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards and options, restricted cash equivalents, and certain Treasury securities, money market funds, and corporate, state and municipal debt securities held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds for Dominion and Virginia Power and rabbi and benefit plan trust funds for Dominion.

Ÿ 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Instruments categorized in Level 3 for Dominion and Virginia Power consist of long-dated commodity derivatives, FTRs and other modeled commodity derivatives. Additional instruments categorized in Level 3 for Dominion include NGLs and natural gas peaking options and alternative investments, consisting of investments in partnerships, joint ventures and other alternative investments, held in benefit plan trust funds.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3). In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In these cases, the lowest level input that is significant to a fair value measurement in its entirety determines the appli-

cableapplicable level in the fair value hierarchy. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.

For derivative contracts, Dominion and Virginia Power recognize transfers among Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 based on fair

values as of the first day of the month in which the transfer occurs. Transfers out of Level 3 represent assets and liabilities that were previously classified as Level 3 for which the inputs became observable for classification in either Level 1 or Level 2. Because the activity and liquidity of commodity markets vary substantially between regions and time periods, the availability of observable inputs for substantially the full term and value of the Companies’ over-the-counter derivative contracts is subject to change.

Level 3 Valuations

Fair value measurements are categorized as Level 3 when a significant amount of price or other inputs that are considered to be unobservable are used in their valuations. Long-dated commodity derivatives are generally based on unobservable inputs due to the length of time to settlement and the absence of market activity and are therefore categorized as Level 3. For NGL derivatives, market illiquidity requires a valuation based on proxy markets that do not always correlate to the actual instrument, therefore they are categorized as Level 3. FTRs are categorized as Level 3 fair value measurements because the only relevant pricing available comes from ISO auctions, which is accurate for day-one valuation, butare generally is not considered to be representative of the ultimate settlement values.liquid markets. Other modeled commodity derivatives have unobservable inputs in their valuation, mostly due to non-transparent and illiquid markets. Alternative investments are categorized as Level 3 due to the absence of quoted market prices, illiquidity and the long-term nature of these assets. These investments are generally valued using NAV based on the proportionate share of the fair value as determined by reference to the most recent audited fair value financial statements or fair value statements provided by the investment manager adjusted for any significant events occurring between the investment manager’s and the Companies’ measurement date.

For derivative contracts, Dominion and Virginia Power recognize transfers among Level 1, Level 2enter into certain physical and financial forwards and futures, options, and full requirements contracts, which are considered Level 3 as they have one or more inputs that are not observable and are significant to the valuation. The discounted cash flow method is used to value Level 3 physical and financial forwards, futures, and full requirements contracts. The discounted cash flow model for forwards and futures calculates mark-to-market valuations based on fair values asforward market prices, original transaction prices, volumes, risk-free rate of return, and credit spreads. Full requirements contracts add load shaping and usage factors in addition to the discounted cash flow model inputs. An option model is used to value Level 3 physical and financial options. The option model calculates mark-to-market valuations using variations of the first dayBlack-Scholes option model. The inputs into the models are the forward market prices, implied price volatilities, risk-free rate of return, the month in whichoption expiration dates, the transfer occurs. Transfers out of Level 3 represent assetsoption strike prices, price correlations, the original sales prices, and liabilities that were previously classified as Level 3 for which the inputs became observable for classification in either Level 1 or Level 2. Because the activity and liquidity of commodity markets vary substantially between regions and time periods, the availability of observable inputs for substantially the full term and value of the Companies’ over-the-counter derivative contracts is subject to change.

At December 31, 2010, Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s net balance of commodity derivatives categorized asvolumes. For Level 3 fair value measurements, was a net liabilitythe forward market prices, the implied price volatilities, price correlations, load shaping, and usage factors are considered unobservable. The unobservable inputs are developed and substantiated using historical information, available market data, third-party data, and statistical analysis. Periodically, inputs to valuation models are reviewed and revised as needed, based on historical information, updated market data, market liquidity and relationships, and changes in third-party pricing sources.

77


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The following table presents Dominion’s quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements. The range and weighted average are presented in dollars for market price inputs and percentages for price volatility, price correlations, load shaping, and usage factors.

    Fair Value (millions)   Valuation Techniques  Unobservable Input      Range   Weighted
Average(1)
 

At December 31, 2012

          

Assets:

          

Physical and Financial Forwards and Futures:

          

Natural Gas(2)

  $13    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per Dth)    (3)   (1) – 6     3  

Electricity

   6    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per MWh)    (3)   30 – 85     50  

FTRs

   5    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per MWh)    (3)   (6) – 7     1  

Capacity

   7    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per MW)    (3)   95 – 115     101  

Liquids(8)

   21    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per Gal)    (3)   0 – 3     1  

Physical and Financial Options:

          

Natural Gas

   5    Option Model   Market Price (per Dth)    (3)   3 – 5     4  
       Price Volatility    (4)   21% – 36%     24
       Price Correlation    (5)   73% – 73%     73

Full Requirements Contracts:

          

Electricity

   27    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per MWh)    (3)   8 – 439(9)     40  
       Load Shaping    (6)   0% – 10%     5
            Usage Factor    (7)   2% – 16%     8

Total assets

  $84                       

Liabilities:

          

Physical and Financial Forwards and Futures:

          

Natural Gas(2)

  $18    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per Dth)    (3)   (1) – 18     3  

Electricity

   1    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per MWh)    (3)   25 – 65     39  

FTRs

   3    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per MWh)    (3)   (1) – 18     0  

Liquids(8)

   25    Discounted Cash Flow   Market Price (per Gal)    (3)   1 – 3     2  

Physical and Financial Options:

          

Natural Gas(2)

   12    Option Model   Market Price (per Dth)    (3)   3 – 8     5  
       Price Volatility    (4)   21% – 36%     32
            Price Correlation    (5)   99%     99

Total liabilities

  $59                       

(1)Averages weighted by volume.
(2)Includes basis.
(3)Represents market prices beyond defined terms for Levels 1 & 2.
(4)Represents volatilities unrepresented in published markets.
(5)Represents intra-price correlations for which markets do not exist.
(6)Converts block monthly loads to 24-hour load shapes.
(7)Represents expected increase (decrease) in sales volumes compared to historical usage.
(8)Includes NGLs.
(9)The range in market prices is the result of large variability in hourly power prices during peak and off-peak hours.

Sensitivity of $50 million and a net asset of $14 million, respectively. A hypothetical 10% increasethe fair value measurements to changes in commodity prices would increase Dominion’s net liability by $69 million and decrease Virginia Power’s net asset by $2 million. A hypothetical 10% decrease in commodity prices would decrease Dominion’s net liability by $66 million and increase Virginia Power’s net asset by $2 million.the significant unobservable inputs is as follows:

Significant Unobservable
Inputs
PositionChange to InputImpact on Fair Value
Measurement

Market Price

BuyIncrease (decrease)Gain (loss)

Market Price

SellIncrease (decrease)Loss (gain)

Price Volatility

BuyIncrease (decrease)Gain (loss)

Price Volatility

SellIncrease (decrease)Loss (gain)

Price Correlation

BuyIncrease (decrease)Loss (gain)

Price Correlation

SellIncrease (decrease)Gain (loss)

Load Factor

Sell(1)Increase (decrease)Loss (gain)

Usage Factor

Sell(2)Increase (decrease)Gain (loss)

(1)Assumes the contract is in a gain position and load increases during peak hours.
(2)Assumes the contract is in a gain position.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Partnership investments held by Virginia Power’s nuclear decommissioning trust fundsMERCHANT POWER STATIONS

In the third quarter of 2012, Dominion decided to pursue the sale of Brayton Point and Dominion’s rabbi trust funds are accountedKincaid, as well as its 50% interest in Elwood, which is an equity method investment. Since Dominion is unlikely to operate the Brayton Point and Kincaid facilities

through their estimated useful lives, Dominion evaluated these power stations for recoverability under a probability weighted approach and concluded that the carrying values of these facilities were not impaired as cost method investments. These investments are only subjectof September 30, 2012.

At December 31, 2012, Dominion updated its recoverability analysis for Brayton Point and Kincaid to reflect bids received and an updated probability weighting. As a result of this updated evaluation, Dominion recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.6 billion ($1.0 billion after-tax), which is included in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income, to write down Brayton Point’s and Kincaid’s long-lived assets to their estimated fair value of approximately $216 million. Dominion used a market approach to estimate the fair value of Brayton Point’s and Kincaid’s long-lived assets. This was considered a Level 2 fair value measurement given it was based on a non-recurring basis when they have experienced an impairment, and are categorizedbids received.

Any sale of Brayton Point, Kincaid, or Dominion’s 50% interest in Elwood would be subject to the approval of Dominion’s Board of Directors, as Level 3 fair value measurements. During 2009, substantially all of these partnership investments experienced impairments. During 2010, these partnership investments did not experience material impairments, therefore no such nonrecurring fair value measurements occurred.

In connection with partnership investments, Dominion and Virginia Power (as a limited partner) make capital commitmentswell as applicable regulatory approvals.

 

 

8078    

 


 

 

In April 2011, Dominion announced it would pursue a sale of Kewaunee since it was not able to move forward with its original plan to grow its nuclear fleet in the Midwest to take advantage of economies of scale. Dominion was unable to find a buyer for the facility. In addition, the power purchase agreements for the two utilities that are called overcontract to buy Kewaunee’s generation will expire in December 2013 at a time asof projected low wholesale electricity prices in the general partner makes investments. Investment strategiesregion. At September 30, 2012, Dominion expected that it would permanently cease generation operations at Kewaunee in 2013 and commence decommissioning of the Companies’ partnership investments are primarily real estate and private equity-based. The typical term of these partnership investments is 10-15 years. The Companies have limited withdrawal or redemption rights during the term of the partnership. As a general rule, a limited partner’s interest can be sold in the secondary markets subject to the approval of the general partner. The secondary market tends to be illiquid especially during periods of market stress. Funds are returned to Dominion and Virginia Power as income, profits and capital are distributed over the term of the partnership.

Presented below are the fair values, unfunded commitments and estimated liquidation periods for partnership investments held by Virginia Power’s decommissioning trust funds and Dominion’s rabbi trust funds at December 31, 2009:

    Fair Value of
Investments
   Unfunded
Commitments
   Estimated Period of
Liquidation
 
(millions)          (average years) 

Decommissioning trust funds

      

Other investments

  $78    $50     7  

Real estate

   19     30     5  

Total

   97     80     6  

Rabbi trust funds

      

Other investments

   10     3     5  

Real estate

   7     7     4  

Total

   17     10     4  

Total decommissioning and rabbi trust funds

  $114    $90     6  

During 2009, Dominion evaluated an equity method investment for impairment and recorded a $30 million impairment in other income in its Consolidated Statement of Income. The resulting fair value of $4 million was estimated using a discounted cash flow model and is considered a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the use of significant unobservable inputs related to the timing and amount of future equity distributions based on the investee’s future financing structure, contractual and market-based revenues and operating costs.

During 2010, Dominion evaluated State Line, a coal-fired merchant power station with minimal environmental controls, for impairment due to the station’s relatively low level of profitability combined with the EPA’s issuance in June 2010 of a new stringent 1-hour primary NAAQS for SO2 that will likely require significant environmental capital expenditures in the future.facility. As a result, Dominion evaluated Kewaunee for impairment since it was more likely than not that Kewaunee would be retired before the end of this evaluation, Dominion recorded an impairment charge of $163 million ($107 million after-tax) in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income, to write down State Line’s long-lived assets to theirpreviously estimated fair value of $59 million.useful life. As management was not aware of any recent market transactions for comparable assets with sufficient transparency to develop a market approach to fair value, Dominion relied onused the income approach (discounted cash flows) to estimate the fair value of State Line’sKewaunee’s long-lived assets. This was considered a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the use of significant unobservable inputs including estimates of future power and other commodity prices.

As a result of this evaluation in September 2012, Dominion recorded impairment and other charges of $435 million ($281 million after-tax) largely reflected in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income. This primarily reflects a $378 million ($244 million after-tax) charge for the full impairment of Kewaunee’s long-lived assets, a write down of materials and supplies inventories of $33 million ($21 million after-tax), and a $24 million ($16 million after-tax) charge related to severance costs.

The decision to decommission Kewaunee was approved by Dominion’s Board of Directors in October 2012 after consideration of the factors discussed above, which made it uneconomic for Kewaunee to continue operations. The station is expected to cease power production in the second quarter of 2013 and commence decommissioning activities. Following station shutdown, Dominion plans to meet its obligations to the two utilities that purchase Kewaunee’s generation through market purchases, until the power purchase agreements expire in December 2013.

In June 2010, Dominion evaluated State Line for impairment due to the station’s relatively low level of profitability combined with the EPA’s issuance of a new stringent 1-hour primary NAAQS for SO2 that would likely require significant environmental capital expenditures in the future. As a result of this evaluation, Dominion recorded an impairment charge of $163 million ($107 million after-tax), which is now reflected in loss from discontinued operations in its Consolidated Statement of Income, to write down State Line’s long-lived assets to their estimated fair value of $59 million.

During March 2011, Dominion determined that it was unlikely that State Line would participate in the May 2011 PJM capacity base residual auction that would commit State Line’s capacity from June 2014 through May 2015. This determination reflected an expectation that margins for coal-fired generation will remain compressed in the 2014 and 2015 period in combination with the expectation that State Line may be impacted during the same time period by environmental regulations that would likely require significant capital expenditures. As a result, Dominion evaluated State Line for impairment since it was more likely than

not that State Line would be retired before the end of its previously estimated useful life. As a result of this evaluation, Dominion recorded an impairment charge of $55 million ($39 million after-tax), which is now reflected in loss from discontinued operations in its Consolidated Statement of Income, to write down State Line’s long-lived assets to their estimated fair value of less than $1 million. State Line was retired in March 2012 and sold in the second quarter of 2012.

In December 2010, Dominion recorded an impairment charge of $31 million ($20 million after-tax), which is now reflected in otherloss from discontinued operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income, to write down the long-lived assets of Salem Harbor to their estimated fair value of less than $1 million as a result of profitability issues.

As management was not aware of any recent market transactions for comparable assets with sufficient transparency to develop a market approach to fair value, Dominion relied onused the income approach (discounted cash flows) to estimate the fair value of State Line’s and Salem Harbor’s long-lived assets. This wasassets in these impairment tests. These were considered a Level 3 fair value measurementmeasurements due to the use of significant unobservable inputs including estimates of future power and other commodity prices.

In the second quarter of 2012, an agreement was reached to sell Salem Harbor and the assets and liabilities to be disposed were classified as held for sale and adjusted to their estimated fair value less cost to sell. This resulted in a pre-tax charge of $27 million ($16 million after-tax), which is included in loss from discontinued operations in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income. This was considered a Level 2 fair value measurement as it was based on the negotiated sales price. Salem Harbor was sold in the third quarter of 2012.

EMISSIONS ALLOWANCES

In September 2010, Virginia Power evaluated its SO2 emissions allowances not expected to be consumed by its generating units for potential impairment due to the significant decline in market prices since the July 2010 release of the EPA’s proposed replacement rule for CAIR, ultimately known as CSAPR. As a result of this evaluation, Virginia Power recorded an impairment charge of $13 million ($8 million after-tax) in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income, to write down its SO2 emissions allowances not expected to be consumed to their estimated fair value of less than $1 million.

In the third quarter of 2011, Dominion and Virginia Power evaluated their SO2 emissions allowances not expected to be consumed by generating units for potential impairment due to the EPA’s issuance of CSAPR as discussed in Note 22. Prior to the issuance of CSAPR, Dominion and Virginia Power held $57 million and $43 million, respectively, of SO2 emissions allowances obtained for ARP and CAIR compliance. Due to CSAPR’s establishment of a new allowance program and the elimination of CAIR, Dominion and Virginia Power had more SO2 emissions allowances than needed for ARP compliance. As a result of this evaluation, Dominion and Virginia Power recorded an impairment charge of $57 million ($34 million after-tax) and $43 million ($26 million after-tax), respectively, in other operations and maintenance expense in their Consolidated Statements of

79


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

Income, to write down these emissions allowances to their estimated fair value of less than $1 million.

To estimate the value of these emissions allowances in both impairment tests, Dominion utilized a market approach by obtaining broker quotes to validate CSAPR’s impact on emissions allowance prices. However, due to limited market activity for future SO2 vintage year allowances, these are considered a Level 3 fair value measurement.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy with a separate reconciliation of fair value measurements categorized as Level 3. Fair value disclosures for assets held in Dominion’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans are presented in Note 22.21.

81


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

DOMINION

The following table presents Dominion’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for each hierarchy level, including both current and noncurrent portions:

 

 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                         

At December 31, 2010

    

At December 31, 2012

        

Assets:

            

Derivatives:

            

Commodity

 $62   $734   $47   $843    $12    $639    $84    $735  

Interest Rate

      54        54  

Interest rate

        93          93  

Investments(1):

            

Equity securities:

            

U.S.:

            

Large Cap

  1,709            1,709     1,973               1,973  

Other

  56            56     59               59  

Non-U.S.:

            

Large Cap

  12            12     12               12  

Fixed Income:

            

Corporate debt instruments

      327        327          325          325  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

  228    165        393     391     152          543  

State and municipal

      286        286          315          315  

Other

      19        19          7          7  

Cash equivalents and other

  25    97        122     13     67          80  

Restricted cash equivalents

      400        400          33          33  

Total assets

 $2,092   $2,082   $47   $4,221    $2,460    $1,631    $84    $4,175  

Liabilities:

            

Derivatives:

            

Commodity

 $12   $716   $97   $825    $8    $528    $59    $595  

Interest Rate

      5        5  

Interest rate

        66          66  

Total liabilities

 $12   $721   $97   $830    $8    $594    $59    $661  

At December 31, 2009

    

Assets:

    

Derivatives:

    

Commodity

 $85   $1,058   $41   $1,184  

Interest Rate

      176        176  

Foreign Currency

      2        2  

Investments(1):

    

Equity securities:

    

U.S.:

    

Large Cap

  1,520            1,520  

Other

  43    1        44  

Non-U.S.:

    

Large Cap

  12            12  

Fixed Income:

    

Corporate debt instruments

      253        253  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

  216    78        294  

State and municipal

      434        434  

Other

      4        4  

Cash equivalents and other

      54        54  

Total assets

 $1,876   $2,060   $41   $3,977  

Liabilities:

    

Derivatives:

    

Commodity

 $17   $736   $107   $860  

Interest Rate

      1        1  

Total liabilities

 $17   $737   $107   $861  
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                

At December 31, 2011

        

Assets:

        

Derivatives:

        

Commodity

  $44    $828    $93    $965  

Interest rate

        105          105  

Investments(1):

        

Equity securities:

        

U.S.:

        

Large Cap

   1,718               1,718  

Other

   51               51  

Non-U.S.:

        

Large Cap

   10               10  

Fixed Income:

        

Corporate debt instruments

        332          332  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   277     181          458  

State and municipal

        329          329  

Other

        23          23  

Cash equivalents and other

        60          60  

Restricted cash equivalents

        141          141  

Total assets

  $2,100    $1,999    $93    $4,192  

Liabilities:

        

Derivatives:

        

Commodity

  $10    $714    $164    $888  

Interest rate

        269          269  

Total liabilities

  $10    $983    $164    $1,157  

 

(1)Includes investments held in the nuclear decommissioning and rabbi trusts.

The following table presents the net change in Dominion’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and included in the Level 3 fair value category:

 

 2010(1) 2009(1) 2008(1)   2012 2011 2010 
(millions)               

Balance at January 1,

 $(66 $99   $(61  $(71 $(50 $(66

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):

       

Included in earnings

  43    (148  (88   (15  (77  43  

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

  (49  (188  274     101    14    (49

Included in regulatory assets/liabilities

  24    52    (59   30    (42  24  

Purchases, issuances and settlements

  (38  126    85  

Settlements

   47    88    (38

Transfers out of Level 3

  36    (7  (52   (67  (4  36  

Balance at December 31,

 $(50 $(66 $99    $25   $(71 $(50

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

 $(4 $(3 $(28  $42   $22   $(4

 

(1)80Represents derivative assets and liabilities presented on a net basis.


The following table presents Dominion’s gains and losses included in earnings in the Level 3 fair value category:

 

   Operating
Revenue
  Electric Fuel
and Energy
Purchases
  Purchased
Gas
  Total 
(millions)            

Year Ended December 31, 2010

    

Total gains (losses) included in earnings

 $(4 $51   $(4 $43  

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  (4          (4

Year Ended December 31, 2009

  

   

Total gains (losses) included in earnings

 $29   $(165 $(12 $(148

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  1        (4  (3

Year Ended December 31, 2008

  

   

Total gains (losses) included in earnings

 $(44 $(28 $(16 $(88

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  (6  (6  (16  (28

82


   Operating
Revenue
  Electric Fuel
and Energy
Purchases
  Purchased
Gas
  Total 
(millions)            

Year Ended December 31, 2012

    

Total gains (losses) included in earnings

 $35   $(50 $   $(15

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  42            42  

Year Ended December 31, 2011

    

Total gains (losses) included in earnings

 $(32 $(45 $   $(77

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  22            22  

Year Ended December 31, 2010

    

Total gains (losses) included in earnings

 $(4 $51   $(4 $43  

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  (4          (4

VIRGINIA POWER

The following table presents Virginia Power’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for each hierarchy level, including both current and noncurrent portions:

 

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                                

At December 31, 2010

        

At December 31, 2012

        

Assets:

                

Derivatives:

                

Commodity

  $    $12    $15    $27    $    $1    $5    $6  

Investments(1):

                

Equity securities:

                

U.S.:

                

Large Cap

   676               676     779               779  

Other

   25               25     27               27  

Fixed Income:

                

Corporate debt instruments

        215          215          196          196  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   80     63          143     168     66          234  

State and municipal

        102          102          118          118  

Other

        15          15          1          1  

Cash equivalents and other

   10     61          71     7     31          38  

Restricted cash equivalents

        169          169          10          10  

Total assets

  $791    $637    $15    $1,443    $981    $423    $5    $1,409  

Liabilities:

                

Derivatives:

                

Commodity

  $    $5    $1    $6    $    $6    $3    $9  

Interest rate

        25          25  

Total Liabilities

  $    $5    $1    $6    $    $31    $3    $34  

At December 31, 2009

        

Assets:

        

Derivatives:

        

Commodity

  $    $30    $2    $32  

Interest Rate

        86          86  

Foreign Currency

        2          2  

Investments(1):

        

Equity securities:

        

U.S.:

        

Large Cap

   615               615  

Other

   19               19  

Fixed Income:

        

Corporate debt instruments

        161          161  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   90     8          98  

State and municipal

        189          189  

Other

        3          3  

Cash equivalents and other

        16          16  

Total assets

  $724    $495    $2    $1,221  

Liabilities:

        

Derivatives:

        

Commodity

  $    $3    $12    $15  

Total Liabilities

  $    $3    $12    $15  
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                

At December 31, 2011

        

Assets:

        

Derivatives:

        

Commodity

  $    $    $2    $2  

Investments(1):

        

Equity securities:

        

U.S.:

        

Large Cap

   679               679  

Other

   23               23  

Fixed Income:

        

Corporate debt instruments

        214          214  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   107     63          170  

State and municipal

        125          125  

Other

        16          16  

Cash equivalents and other

        40          40  

Restricted cash equivalents

        32          32  

Total assets

  $809    $490    $2    $1,301  

Liabilities:

        

Derivatives:

        

Commodity

  $    $17    $30    $47  

Interest rate

        100          100  

Total Liabilities

  $    $117    $30    $147  

 

(1)Includes investments held in the nuclear decommissioning and rabbi trusts.

The following table presents the net change in Virginia Power’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and included in the Level 3 fair value category:

 

    2010(1)  2009(1)  2008(1) 
(millions)          

Balance at January 1,

  $(10 $(69 $(4

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):

    

Included in earnings

   51    (165  (27

Included in regulatory assets/liabilities

   24    53    (59

Purchases, issuances and settlements

   (51  170    21  

Transfers out of Level 3

       1      

Balance at December 31,

  $14   $(10 $(69

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  $   $   $(5

(1)Represents derivative assets and liabilities presented on a net basis.
    2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Balance at January 1,

  $(28 $14   $(10

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):

    

Included in earnings

   (50  (45  51  

Included in regulatory assets/liabilities

   30    (42  24  

Settlements

   50    45    (51

Transfers out of Level 3

             

Balance at December 31,

  $2   $(28 $14  

The gains and losses included in earnings in the Level 3 fair value category, including those attributable to the change in unrealized gains and losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date, were classified in electric fuel and other energy-related purchases expense in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008.2010. There were no unrealized gains and losses included in earnings in the Level 3 fair value category relating to assets/liabilities still held at the reporting date for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Substantially all of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s financial instruments are recorded at fair value, with the exception of the instruments described below that are reported at historical cost. Estimated fair values have been determined using available market information and valuation methodologies considered appropriate by management. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, customer and other receivables, short-term debt and accounts payable are representative of fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. For Dominion’s and VirginiaVir-

81


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

ginia Power’s financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value, the carrying amounts and fair values are as follows:

 

At December 31,  2010   2009   2012   2011 
  Carrying
Amount
   Estimated
Fair  Value(1)
   Carrying
Amount
   Estimated
Fair Value(1)
   Carrying
Amount
   Estimated
Fair  Value(1)
   Carrying
Amount
   Estimated
Fair  Value(1)
 
(millions)                                

Dominion

                

Long-term debt, including securities due within one year(2)

  $14,520    $16,112    $14,867    $15,970    $16,841    $19,898    $16,264    $18,936  

Junior subordinated notes payable to affiliates

   268     261     268     255  

Enhanced junior subordinated notes

   1,467     1,560     1,483     1,487  

Long-term debt, including securities due within one year—VIE(3)

   860     864     890     892  

Junior subordinated notes

   1,373     1,430     1,719     1,786  

Subsidiary preferred stock(3)(4)

   257     249     257     251     257     255     257     256  

Virginia Power

                

Long-term debt, including securities due within one year(2)

  $6,717    $7,489    $6,458    $6,977    $6,669    $8,270    $6,862    $8,281  

Preferred stock(3)

   257     249     257     251  

Preferred stock(4)

   257     255     257     256  

 

(1)

Fair value is estimated using market prices, where available, and interest rates currently available for issuance of debt with similar terms and

83


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

remaining maturities. All fair value measurements are classified as Level 2. The carrying amount of debt issues with short-term maturities and variable rates refinanced at current market rates is a reasonable estimate of their fair value.

(2)Includes amounts which represent the unamortized discount and premium. At December 31, 2010,2012, and 2009,2011, includes the valuation of certain fair value hedges associated with Dominion’s fixed rate debt, of approximately $49$93 million and $23$105 million, respectively.
(3)Includes amounts which represent the unamortized premium.
(4)Includes deferred issuance expenses of $2 million at December 31, 20102012 and 2009.2011.

 

 

NOTE 8.7. DERIVATIVESAND HEDGE ACCOUNTING ACTIVITIES

Dominion and Virginia Power are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products they market and purchase, as well as currency exchange and interest rate risks of their business operations. The Companies use derivative instruments to manage exposure to these risks, and designate certain derivative instruments as fair value or cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. As discussed in Note 2, for jurisdictions subject to cost-based rate regulation, changes in the fair value of derivatives are deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities until the related transactions impact earnings. See Note 76 for further information about fair value measurements and associated valuation methods for derivatives.

DOMINION

The following table presents the volume of Dominion’s derivative activity as of December 31, 2010.2012. These volumes are based on open derivative positions and represent the combined absolute value of their long and short positions, except in the case of offsetting deals,transactions, for which they represent the absolute value of the net volume of their long and short positions.

 

  Current   Noncurrent   Current   Noncurrent 

Natural Gas (bcf):

        

Fixed price(1)

   358     98     249     68  

Basis(1)

   1,012     465     786     534  

Electricity (MWh):

        

Fixed price

   22,047,293     12,526,648  

Fixed price(1)

   20,100,938     12,582,674  

FTRs

   49,301,662     1,817,176     46,851,683       

Capacity (MW)

   1,383,800     4,020,050     151,025     148,461  

Liquids (gallons)(2)

   148,764,000     361,536,000     164,682,000     145,698,000  

Interest rate

  $    $1,000,000,000    $1,500,000,000    $2,250,000,000  

 

(1)Includes options.
(2)Includes NGLs and oil.

Selected information about Dominion’s hedge accounting activities follows:For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, gains or losses on hedging instruments determined to be ineffective and amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness were not material. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness include gains or losses attributable to changes in the time value of options and changes in the differences between spot prices and forward prices.

Year Ended December 31,  2010  2009  2008 
(millions)          

Portion of gains (losses) on hedging instruments determined to be ineffective and included in net income:

    

Fair value hedges(1)

  $3   $(4 $(6

Cash flow hedges(2)

   (1      (4

Net ineffectiveness

  $2   $(4 $(10

Gains (losses) attributable to changes in the time value of options and change in the differences between spot prices and forward prices and excluded from the assessment of effectiveness(3):

    

Fair value hedges(4)

  $   $23   $11  

Total ineffectiveness and excluded amounts

  $2   $19   $1  

(1)For the year ended December 31, 2010, includes $(1) million recorded in purchased gas and $4 million recorded in operating revenue in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Income. For the year ended December 31, 2009, includes $(5) million recorded in purchased gas and $1 million recorded in operating revenue in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
(2)For the year ended December 31, 2010, includes $(3) million recorded in purchased gas and $2 million recorded in operating revenue in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
(3)Amounts excluded from the measurement of ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were not material.
(4)For the year ended December 31, 2009, includes $22 million recorded in operating revenue and $1 million recorded in electric fuel and other energy-related purchases in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

The following table presents selected information related to gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in AOCI in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010:2012:

 

  AOCI
After-Tax
 Amounts Expected
to be Reclassified
to Earnings during
the next 12
Months After-Tax
 Maximum
Term
   AOCI
After-Tax
 Amounts Expected
to be Reclassified
to Earnings during
the next 12
Months After-Tax
 Maximum
Term
 
(millions)                

Commodities:

        

Gas

  $(24 $(13  48 months    $(28 $(24  27 months  

Electricity

   70    68    29 months     68    17    36 months  

NGLs

   (36  (15  48 months  

Other

   8    2    53 months     3    2    41 months  

Interest rate

   33    (1  336 months     (165  (21  361 months  

Total

  $51   $41     $(122 $(26 

The amounts that will be reclassified from AOCI to earnings will generally be offset by the recognition of the hedged transactions (e.g., anticipated sales) in earnings, thereby achieving the realization of prices contemplated by the underlying risk management strategies and will vary from the expected amounts presented above as a result of changes in market prices and interest rates.

The sale of the majority of Dominion’s remaining E&P operations resulted in the discontinuance of hedge accounting for certain cash flow hedges in 2010, as discussed in Note 4.3.

84


In addition, changes to Dominion’s financing needs during the first and second quarters of 2010 resulted in the discontinuance of hedge accounting for certain cash flow hedges since it was determined that the forecasted interest payments would not occur. In connection with the discontinuance of hedge accounting for these contracts, Dominion recognized a benefit recorded to interest and related charges reflecting the reclassification of gains

82


from AOCI to earnings of $110 million ($67 million after-tax) for 2010. The reclassification of gains from AOCI to earnings was partially offset by subsequent changes in fair value for these contracts of $37 million ($23 million after-tax) for 2010.

Fair Value and Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments

The following tables present the fair values of Dominion’s derivatives and where they are presented in its Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

At December 31, 2010  Fair Value -
Derivatives
under
Hedge
Accounting
   Fair Value -
Derivatives
not under
Hedge
Accounting
   Total
Fair
Value
 
At December 31, 2012  Fair Value -
Derivatives
under
Hedge
Accounting
   Fair Value -
Derivatives
not under
Hedge
Accounting
   Total
Fair
Value
 
(millions)                        

ASSETS

            

Current Assets

            

Commodity

  $291    $425    $716    $103    $379    $482  

Interest rate

   23          23     36          36  

Total current derivative assets

   314     425     739     139     379     518  

Noncurrent Assets

            

Commodity

   44     83     127     130     123     253  

Interest rate

   31          31     57          57  

Total noncurrent derivative assets(1)

   75     83     158     187     123     310  

Total derivative assets

  $389    $508    $897    $326    $502    $828  

LIABILITIES

            

Current Liabilities

            

Commodity

  $178    $455    $633    $103    $341    $444  

Interest rate

   66          66  

Total current derivative liabilities

   169     341     510  

Noncurrent Liabilities

      

Commodity

   58     93     151  

Total noncurrent derivative liabilities(2)

   58     93     151  

Total derivative liabilities

  $227    $434    $661  
At December 31, 2011               

ASSETS

      

Current Assets

      

Commodity

  $176    $495    $671  

Interest rate

   34          34  

Total current derivative assets

   210     495     705  

Noncurrent Assets

      

Commodity

   198     96     294  

Interest rate

   71          71  

Total noncurrent derivative assets(1)

   269     96     365  

Total derivative assets

  $479    $591    $1,070  

LIABILITIES

      

Current Liabilities

      

Commodity

  $162    $530    $692  

Interest rate

   222     37     259  

Total current derivative liabilities

   178     455     633     384     567     951  

Noncurrent Liabilities

            

Commodity

   86     106     192     118     78     196  

Interest rate

   5          5          10     10  

Total noncurrent derivative liabilities(2)

   91     106     197     118     88     206  

Total derivative liabilities

  $269    $561    $830    $502    $655    $1,157  
(1)Noncurrent derivative assets are presented in other deferred charges and other assets in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets.
(2)Noncurrent derivative liabilities are presented in other deferred credits and other liabilities in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
At December 31, 2009  Fair Value -
Derivatives
under
Hedge
Accounting
   Fair Value -
Derivatives
not under
Hedge
Accounting
   Total
Fair
Value
 
(millions)            

ASSETS

      

Current Assets

      

Commodity

  $445    $507    $952  

Interest rate

   174          174  

Foreign Currency

   2          2  

Total current derivative assets

   621     507     1,128  

Noncurrent Assets

      

Commodity

   132     100     232  

Interest rate

   2          2  

Total noncurrent derivative assets(1)

   134     100     234  

Total derivative assets

  $755    $607    $1,362  

LIABILITIES

      

Current Liabilities

      

Commodity

  $147    $532    $679  

Total current derivative liabilities

   147     532     679  

Noncurrent Liabilities

      

Commodity

   61     120     181  

Interest rate

   1          1  

Total noncurrent derivative liabilities(2)

   62     120     182  

Total derivative liabilities

  $209    $652    $861  
(1)Noncurrent derivative assets are presented in other deferred charges and other assets in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2)Noncurrent derivative liabilities are presented in other deferred credits and other liabilities in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets.

The following tables present the gains and losses on Dominion’s derivatives, as well as where the associated activity is presented in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Income:

 

Year ended December 31, 2010
Derivatives in cash flow hedging

relationships

  Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)(1)
  Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
to Income
  Increase
(Decrease)
in
Derivatives
Subject to
Regulatory
Treatment(2)
 
(millions)          

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity:

    

Operating revenue

   $557   

Purchased gas

    (155 

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

    (8 

Purchased electric capacity

       3      

Total commodity

  $139    397   $(17

Interest rate(3)

   (3  109    (27

Foreign currency(4)

       1    (2

Total

  $136   $507   $(46

85


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

Year ended December 31, 2009

Derivatives in cash flow hedging
relationships

  Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)(1)
   Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
to Income
 Increase
(Decrease)
in
Derivatives
Subject to
Regulatory
Treatment(2)
 
Derivatives in cash flow hedging
relationships
Year Ended December 31, 2012
  Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)(1)
 Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
to Income
 Increase
(Decrease)
in
Derivatives
Subject to
Regulatory
Treatment(2)
 
(millions)                  

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity:

    

Operating revenue

   $188   

Purchased gas

    (75 

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

    (17 

Total commodity

  $71   $96   $10  

Interest rate(3)

   (84  (2  (35

Total

  $(13 $94   $(25
Year Ended December 31, 2011           

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity:

    

Operating revenue

   $153   

Purchased gas

    (78 

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

    (2 

Purchased electric capacity

    1   

Total commodity

  $137   $74   $(20

Interest rate(3)

   (252  (8  (143

Total

  $(115 $66   $(163
Year Ended December 31, 2010           

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

         

Commodity:

         

Operating revenue

    $1,072      $557   

Purchased gas

     (179     (155 

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

     (10     (8 

Purchased electric capacity

      4       3   

Total commodity

  $358    $887   $6    $139   $397   $(17

Interest rate(3)

   159     (4  87     (3  109    (27

Foreign currency(4)

        2    (3       1    (2

Total

  $517    $885   $90    $136   $507   $(46

 

(1)Amounts deferred into AOCI have no associated effect in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)Represents net derivative activity deferred into and amortized out of regulatory assets/liabilities. Amounts deferred into regulatory assets/liabilities have no associated effect in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
(3)Amounts recorded in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income are classified in interest and related charges.
(4)Amounts recorded in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income are classified in electric fuel and other energy-related purchases.

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging

instruments

  

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in

Income on Derivatives(1)

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2010

   2009 
(millions)        

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity

    

Operating revenue

  $67     $105  

Purchased gas

   (41)     (66

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   51      (163

Interest rate(2)

   (37)       

Total

  $40     $(124

83


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments
  Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives(1)
 
Year Ended December 31,  2012  2011  2010 
(millions)          

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity:

    

Operating revenue

  $168   $111   $67  

Purchased gas

   (14  (35  (41

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   (40  (45  51  

Interest rate(2)

   17    (5  (37

Total

  $131   $26   $40  

 

(1)Includes derivative activity amortized out of regulatory assets/liabilities. Amounts deferred into regulatory assets/liabilities have no associated effect in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)Amounts recorded in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income are classified in interest and related charges.

VIRGINIA POWER

The following table presents the volume of Virginia Power’s derivative activity at December 31, 2010.2012. These volumes are based on open derivative positions and represent the combined absolute value of their long and short positions, except in the case of offsetting deals,transactions, for which they represent the absolute value of the net volume of their long and short positions.

 

  Current   Noncurrent   Current   Noncurrent 

Natural Gas (bcf):

        

Fixed price

   10          16       

Basis

   5          8       

Electricity (MWh):

        

Fixed price

   651,200          709,600       

FTRs

   48,141,239     1,817,176     43,570,739       

Capacity (MW)

   288,200     258,500     107,000     93,800  

Interest rate

  $500,000,000    $250,000,000  

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, gains or losses on hedging instruments determined to be ineffective and amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness were not material. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness include gains or losses attributable to the time value of options and changes in the differences between spot prices and forward prices.

The following table presents selected information related to gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in AOCI in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010:

    AOCI
After-Tax
   Amounts Expected to be
Reclassified to Earnings
during the next 12
Months After-Tax
   Maximum
Term
 
(millions)            

Interest rate

  $3    $     336 months  

Other

   1     1     41 months  

Total

  $4    $1       

The amounts that will be reclassified from AOCI to earnings will generally be offset by the recognition of the hedged transactions (e.g., anticipated interest payments) in earnings, thereby achieving the realization of prices contemplated by the underlying risk management strategies and will vary from the expected amounts presented above as a result of changes in market prices and interest rates.

86


Fair Value and Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments

The following tables present the fair values of Virginia Power’s derivatives and where they are presented in its Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

At December 31, 2010  Fair Value -
Derivatives
under
Hedge
Accounting
   Fair Value -
Derivatives
not under
Hedge
Accounting
   Total
Fair
Value
 
At December 31, 2012  Fair Value -
Derivatives
under
Hedge
Accounting
   Fair Value -
Derivatives
not under
Hedge
Accounting
   Total
Fair
Value
 
(millions)                        

ASSETS

            

Current Assets

            

Commodity

  $12    $15    $27    $1    $5    $6  

Total current derivative assets

   12     15     27  

Total current derivative assets(1)

   1     5     6  

Total derivative assets

  $12    $15    $27    $1    $5    $6  

LIABILITIES

            

Current Liabilities

            

Commodity

  $2    $1    $3    $5    $3    $8  

Total current derivative liabilities(1)

   2     1     3  

Interest rate

   25          25  

Total current derivative liabilities

   30     3     33  

Noncurrent Liabilities

            

Commodity

   3          3     1          1  

Total noncurrent derivative liabilities(2)

   3          3     1          1  

Total derivative liabilities

  $5    $1    $6    $31    $3    $34  

At December 31, 2009

               
(millions)            
At December 31, 2011               

ASSETS

            

Current Assets

            

Commodity

  $20    $2    $22    $    $2    $2  

Interest Rate

   86          86  

Foreign Currency

   2          2  

Total current derivative assets

   108     2     110  

Noncurrent Assets

      

Commodity

   10          10  

Total noncurrent derivative assets(3)

   10          10  

Total current derivative assets(1)

        2     2  

Total derivative assets

  $118    $2    $120    $ —    $2    $2  

LIABILITIES

            

Current Liabilities

            

Commodity

  $1    $12    $13    $14    $31    $45  

Total current derivative liabilities(1)

   1     12     13  

Interest rate

   53     37     90  

Total current derivative liabilities

   67     68     135  

Noncurrent Liabilities

            

Commodity

   2          2     2          2  

Interest rate

        10     10  

Total noncurrent derivative liabilities(2)

   2          2     2     10     12  

Total derivative liabilities

  $3    $12    $15    $69    $78    $147  

 

(1)Current derivative liabilitiesassets are presented in other current liabilitiesassets in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets.
(2)Noncurrent derivative liabilities are presented in other deferred credits and other liabilities in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets.
(3)Noncurrent derivative assets are presented in other deferred charges and other assets in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

84   87

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

The following tables present the gains and losses on Virginia Power’s derivatives, as well as where the associated activity is presented in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Income:

 

Derivatives in cash flow hedging

relationships

Year Ended December 31, 2010

  Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)(1)
 Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI to
Income
 Increase
(Decrease) in
Derivatives
Subject to
Regulatory
Treatment(2)
 

Derivatives in cash flow hedging

relationships

Year Ended December 31, 2012

  Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective
Portion)(1)
 Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI to
Income
 Increase
(Decrease) in
Derivatives
Subject to
Regulatory
Treatment(2)
 
(millions)                

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

        

Commodity

    

Commodity:

    

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   $(4 

Total commodity

  $(2 $(4 $10  

Interest rate(3)

   (6      (35

Total

  $(8 $(4 $(25
Year Ended December 31, 2011           

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity:

    

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   $(1 

Purchased electric capacity

    1   

Total commodity

  $(3 $ —   $(20

Interest rate(3)

   (6  1    (143

Total

  $(9 $1   $(163
Year Ended December 31, 2010           

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity:

    

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   $(1    $(1 

Purchased electric capacity

    4       4   

Total commodity

  $(1  3   $(17  $(1 $3   $(17

Interest rate(3)

   (1  9    (27   (1  9    (27

Foreign currency(4)

           (2           (2

Total

  $(2 $12   $(46  $(2 $12   $(46

Year Ended December 31, 2009

           
(millions)        

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

    

Commodity

    

Electric fuel and other energy-related purchases

   $(8 

Purchased electric capacity

    5   

Total commodity

  $(3  (3 $6  

Interest rate(3)

   15        87  

Foreign currency(4)

       1    (3

Total

  $12   $(2 $90  

 

(1)Amounts deferred into AOCI have no associated effect in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)Represents net derivative activity deferred into and amortized out of regulatory assets/liabilities. Amounts deferred into regulatory assets/liabilities have no associated effect in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
(3)Amounts recorded in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income are classified in interest and related charges.
(4)Amounts recorded in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income are classified in electric fuel and other energy-related purchases.

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments
  Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivatives(1)
   Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivatives(1)
 
     
Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 
(millions)              

Derivative Type and Location of Gains (Losses)

       

Commodity(2)

   $51    $(165  $(50 $(45 $51  

Interest rate(3)

   (3           (5  (3

Total

   $48    $(165  $(50 $(50 $48  

(1)Includes derivative activity amortized out of regulatory assets/liabilities. Amounts deferred into regulatory assets/liabilities have no associated effect in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)Amounts recorded in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income are recordedclassified in electric fuel and other energy-related purchases in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income.purchases.
(3)Amounts recorded in Virginia Power’s Consolidated Statements of Income are classified in interest and related charges.

NOTE 9.8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table presents the calculation of Dominion’s basic and diluted EPS:

 

    2010   2009   2008 
(millions, except EPS)            

Net income attributable to Dominion

  $2,808    $1,287    $1,834  

Average shares of common stock outstanding—Basic

   588.9     593.3     577.8  

Net effect of potentially dilutive securities(1)

   1.2     0.4     3.0  

Average shares of common stock outstanding—Diluted

   590.1     593.7     580.8  

Earnings Per Common Share—Basic

  $4.77    $2.17    $3.17  

Earnings Per Common Share—Diluted

  $4.76    $2.17    $3.16  
    2012   2011   2010 
(millions, except EPS)            

Net income attributable to Dominion

  $302    $1,408    $2,808  

Average shares of common stock outstanding-Basic

   572.9     573.1     588.9  

Net effect of potentially dilutive securities(1)

   1.0     1.5     1.2  

Average shares of common stock outstanding-Diluted

   573.9     574.6     590.1  

Earnings Per Common Share-Basic

  $0.53    $2.46    $4.77  

Earnings Per Common Share-Diluted

  $0.53    $2.45    $4.76  

 

(1)Potentially dilutive securities consist of options, goal-based stock and contingently convertible senior notes.

Potentially dilutive securities with the right

85


Combined Notes to acquire approximately 1.2 million common shares for the year ended December 31, 2009 were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because the exercise or purchase prices of those instruments were greater than the average market price of Dominion’s common shares. Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

There were no potentially dilutive securities excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 20102012, 2011 and 2008.

88


2010.

 

 

NOTE 10.9. INVESTMENTS

DOMINION

Equity and Debt Securities

RABBI TRUST SECURITIES

Marketable equity and debt securities and cash equivalents held in Dominion’s rabbi trusts and classified as trading totaled $93$95 million and $96$90 million at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively. Net unrealized gains on trading securities totaled $5 million and $11 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, and net unrealized losses on trading securities totaled $26 million in 2008. Cost-method investments held in Dominion’s rabbi trusts totaled $18$14 million and $17 million at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

DECOMMISSIONING TRUST SECURITIES

Dominion holds marketable equity and debt securities (classified as available-for-sale), cash equivalents and cost method investments in nuclear decommissioning trust funds to fund future decommissioning costs for its nuclear plants. Dominion’s decommissioning trust funds are summarized below.below:

 

  Amortized
Cost
   Total
Unrealized
Gains(1)
   Total
Unrealized
Losses(1)
 Fair
Value (2)
   Amortized
Cost
   Total
Unrealized
Gains(1)
   Total
Unrealized
Losses(1)
 Fair
Value
 
(millions)                            

2010

       

2012

       

Marketable equity securities:

              

U.S.:

              

Large Cap

  $1,161    $515    $   $1,676    $1,210    $732    $ —   $1,942  

Other

   39     11         50     40     13         53  

Marketable debt securities:

              

Corporate debt instruments

   310     18     (1  327     295     30         325  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   380     12     (1)  391     523     19     (2  540  

State and municipal

   244     7     (4  247     248     26         274  

Other

   19              19     6     1         7  

Cost method investments

   108              108     117              117  

Cash equivalents and other

   79              79  

Cash equivalents and other(2)

   72              72  

Total

  $2,340    $563    $(6)(3)  $2,897    $2,511    $821    $(2)(3)  $3,330  

2009

       

2011

       

Marketable equity securities:

              

U.S.:

              

Large Cap

  $1,171    $321    $   $1,492    $1,152    $537    $   $1,689  

Other

   20     17         37     36     10         46  

Marketable debt securities:

              

Corporate debt instruments

   241     13     (1  253     314     19     (1  332  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   281     13     (1  293     437     20     (1  456  

State and municipal

   371     21     (3  389     264     24         288  

Other

   4              4     23     1         24  

Cost method investments

   97              97     118              118  

Cash equivalents and other

   60              60  

Cash equivalents and other(2)

   46              46  

Total

  $2,245    $385    $(5)(3)  $2,625    $2,390    $611    $(2)(3)  $2,999  

 

(1)Included in AOCI and the decommissioning trust regulatory liability as discussed in Note 2.
(2)Includes pending purchases of securities of $43$6 million at December 31, 2010. Includes pending sales of securities ofand $11 million at December 31, 2009.2012 and 2011, respectively.
(3)The fair value of securities in an unrealized loss position was $252$195 million and $169$164 million at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

 

The fair value of Dominion’s marketable debt securities held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds at December 31, 20102012 by contractual maturity is as follows:

 

    Amount 

(millions)

  

Due in one year or less

  $50  

Due after one year through five years

   306  

Due after five years through ten years

   277  

Due after ten years

   351  

Total

  $984  

    Amount 
(millions)    

Due in one year or less

  $116  

Due after one year through five years

   304  

Due after five years through ten years

   357  

Due after ten years

   369  

Total

  $1,146  

Presented below is selected information regarding Dominion’s marketable equity and debt securities held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds.funds:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008   2012   2011   2010 
(millions)                    

Proceeds from sales

   1,814(1)   1,478(2)   916    $1,356    $1,757    $1,814(1) 

Realized gains(3)(2)

   111    215    140     98     79     111  

Realized losses(3)(2)

   63    211    404     33     92     63  
        

 

(1)

The increase in proceeds primarily reflects the replacement of commingled funds with actively managed portfolios. Does not include $1 billion of pro-proceeds reflected in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows from the sale of temporary investments

 

 

86   89

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

 

ceeds reflected in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows from the sale of temporary investments consisting of time deposits and Treasury Bills, purchased following the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations.

(2)The increase in proceeds primarily reflects changes in asset allocation and liquidation of positions in connection with changes in fund managers.
(3)Includes realized gains and losses recorded to the decommissioning trust regulatory liability as discussed in Note 2.

Dominion recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010 
(millions)                

Total other-than-temporary impairment losses(1)

  $59   $175   $344    $26   $75   $59  

Losses recorded to decommissioning trust regulatory liability

   (21  (80  (105   (10  (24  (21

Losses recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)

   (3  (3       (2  (3  (3

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

  $35   $92   $239    $14   $48   $35  

 

(1)Amounts include other-than-temporary impairment losses for debt securities of $10$4 million, $13$6 million and $28$10 million at December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, respectively.

Equity Method Investments

Investments that Dominion accounts for under the equity method of accounting are as follows:

 

Company  Ownership% Investment
Balance
 Description   Ownership% 

Investment

Balance

 Description
As of December 31,     2010   2009         2012   2011   
(millions)                      

Fowler I Holdings LLC(1)

   50 $180    $193    
 
Wind-powered merchant
generation facility
  
  
   50 $158    $166   Wind-powered merchant
generation facility

NedPower Mount Storm LLC

   50  149     157    
 
Wind-powered merchant
generation facility
  
  
   50  137     146   Wind-powered merchant
generation facility

Elwood Energy LLC

   50  117     108   Natural gas-fired
merchant generation
peaking facility

Iroquois Gas Transmission System, LP

   24.72  106     102    Gas transmission system     24.72  102     104   Gas transmission
system

Elwood Energy LLC

   50  98     90    

 

 

Natural gas-fired

merchant generation

peaking facility

  

  

  

Other

   various    38     53   

Blue Racer Midstream LLC

   50  39        Midstream gas and
related services

Other(1)

   various    5     29   

Total

   $571    $595      $558    $553   

 

(1)In September 2009, Dominion receivedhas a $123$50 million distribution from Fowler Ridge based on proceeds receivedcommitment to invest in connection with non-recourse permanent financing for the first phase of the project.clean power and technology businesses through 2018.

Dominion’s equity earnings on these investments totaled $25 million, $35 million and $42 million in both2012, 2011 and 2010, and 2009 and $52 million in 2008. Excluding the 2009 distribution from Fowler Ridge,respectively. Dominion received distributions from these investments of $58 million, $55 million and $60 million $63 millionin 2012, 2011, and $12 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, the carrying amount of Dominion’s investments exceeded Dominion’s share of underlying equity in net assets by approximately $7$30 million and $19$32 million, respectively. Excluding the impairment losses discussed below, theThe differences relate to Dominion’s investments in wind projects and primarily reflect its capitalized interest during construction and the excess of its cash contributions over the book value of development assets contributed by Dominion’s partners for these projects. The differences are generally being amortized over the

useful lives of the underlying assets.

During 2009,BLUE RACER

In December 2012, Dominion recognized total impairment lossesformed a joint venture with Caiman to provide midstream services to natural gas producers operating in the Utica Shale region in Ohio and portions of $30Pennsylvania. The joint venture, Blue Racer, is an equal partner-

ship between Dominion and Caiman, with Dominion contributing midstream assets and Caiman contributing private equity capital. In return for its December 2012 contribution of assets to the joint venture, Dominion received a 50% interest in Blue Racer and received $115 million in connectioncash proceeds, resulting in a gain of $72 million ($43 million after-tax), net of transaction fees of $9 million, which is recorded in other operations and maintenance expense in Dominion’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The joint venture will leverage Dominion’s existing presence in the Utica region with significant additional new capacity designed to meet producer needs as the Utica Shale acreage is developed. Midstream services offered will include gathering, processing, fractionation, and NGL transportation and marketing. In addition to the assets already contributed, Dominion expects to contribute additional gathering assets, the Natrium extraction plant and related NGL Pipeline, and a decline in estimated fair value of one of its equity method investments as discussed in Note 7. During 2008, Dominion recognized a $7 million gain on the sale of one of its equity method investments.DTI pipeline connecting East Ohio’s gathering system to Natrium.

VIRGINIA POWER

Virginia Power holds marketable equity and debt securities (classified as available-for-sale), cash equivalents and cost method investments in nuclear decommissioning trust funds to fund future decommissioning costs for its nuclear plants. Virginia Power’s decommissioning trust funds are summarized below.below:

 

    Amortized
Cost
   Total
Unrealized
Gains(1)
   Total
Unrealized
Losses(1)
  Fair
Value (2)
 
(millions)               

2010

       

Marketable equity securities:

       

U.S.:

       

Large Cap

  $469    $207    $   $676  

Other

   20     5         25  

Marketable debt securities:

       

Corporate debt instruments

   205     10         215  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   141     2         143  

State and municipal

   103     1     (2  102  

Other

   15              15  

Cost method investments

   108              108  

Cash equivalents and other

   35              35  

Total

  $1,096    $225    $(2)(3)  $1,319  

2009

       

Marketable equity securities:

       

U.S.:

       

Large Cap

  $489    $126    $   $615  

Other

   10     9         19  

Marketable debt securities:

       

Corporate debt instruments

   153     9     (1  161  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   95     3         98  

State and municipal

   181     9     (1  189  

Other

   3              3  

Cost method investments

   97              97  

Cash equivalents and other

   22              22  

Total

  $1,050    $156    $(2)(3)  $1,204  

    Amortized
Cost
   Total
Unrealized
Gains(1)
   Total
Unrealized
Losses(1)
  Fair
Value
 
(millions)               

2012

       

Marketable equity securities:

       

U.S.:

       

Large Cap

  $481    $298    $   $779  

Other

   20     7         27  

Marketable debt securities:

       

Corporate debt instruments

   179     17         196  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   231     4     (1  234  

State and municipal

   106     11         117  

Other

   1              1  

Cost method investments

   117              117  

Cash equivalents and other(2)

   44              44  

Total

  $1,179    $337    $(1)(3)  $1,515  

2011

       

Marketable equity securities:

       

U.S.:

       

Large Cap

  $460    $218    $   $678  

Other

   18     5         23  

Marketable debt securities:

       

Corporate debt instruments

   204     11     (1  214  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   166     4         170  

State and municipal

   114     10         124  

Other

   16     1     (1  16  

Cost method investments

   118              118  

Cash equivalents and other(2)

   27              27  

Total

  $1,123    $249    $(2)(3)  $1,370  

 

(1)Included in AOCI and the decommissioning trust regulatory liability as discussed in Note 2.

87


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

(2)Includes pending purchases of securities of $35 million at December 31, 2010. Includes pending sales of securities of $6 million and pending purchases of securities of $13 million at December 31, 2009.2012 and 2011, respectively.
(3)The fair value of securities in an unrealized loss position was $159$104 million and $88$99 million at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

90


The fair value of Virginia Power’s debt securities at December 31, 2010,2012, by contractual maturity is as follows:

 

  Amount   Amount 
(millions)        

Due in one year or less

  $    $18  

Due after one year through five years

   151     156  

Due after five years through ten years

   167     217  

Due after ten years

   157     157  

Total

  $475    $548  

Presented below is selected information regarding Virginia Power’s marketable equity and debt securities.

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008   2012   2011   2010 
(millions)                    

Proceeds from sales

  $1,192(1)  $715(2)  $410    $626    $1,030    $1,192  

Realized gains(3)(1)

   52    104    45     42     34     52  

Realized losses(3)(1)

   23    99    143     11     34     23  

 

(1)The increase in proceeds primarily reflects the replacement of commingled funds with actively managed portfolios.
(2)The increase in proceeds primarily reflects changes in asset allocation and liquidation of positions in connection with changes in fund managers.
(3)Includes realized gains and losses recorded to the decommissioning trust regulatory liability as discussed in Note 2.

Virginia Power recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010 
(millions)                

Total other-than-temporary impairment losses(1)

  $25   $94   $123    $11   $29   $25  

Losses recorded to decommissioning trust regulatory liability

   (21  (80  (105   (10  (24  (21

Losses recorded in other comprehensive income (before taxes)

   (1               (1  (1

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

  $3   $14   $18    $1   $4   $3  

 

(1)Amounts include other-than-temporary impairment losses for debt securities of $6$2 million, $7$4 million and $5$6 million at December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, respectively.

Other InvestmentsOTHER INVESTMENTS

Dominion and Virginia Power hold restricted cash and cash equivalent balances that primarily consist of money market fund investments held in trust for the purpose of funding certain qualifyingqual-

ifying construction projects. At December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, Dominion had $415$37 million and $18$147 million, respectively, and Virginia Power had $169$10 million and $4$32 million, respectively, of restricted cash and cash equivalents. These balances are presented in Other Current Assets and Investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

NOTE 11.10. PROPERTY, PLANTAND EQUIPMENT

Major classes of property, plant and equipment and their respective balances for the Companies are as follows:

 

At December 31,  2010   2009   2012   2011 
(millions)                

Dominion

        

Utility:

        

Generation

  $11,381    $11,105    $13,707    $11,793  

Transmission

   5,793     5,003     7,799     6,604  

Distribution

   9,883     9,415     11,071     10,401  

Storage

   1,892     1,837     2,137     2,060  

Nuclear fuel

   1,058     994     1,277     1,193  

Gas gathering and processing

   535     492     803     727  

General and other

   730     737     803     778  

Other—including plant under construction

   3,933     3,110  

Other-including plant under construction

   2,232     3,597  

Total utility

   35,205     32,693     39,829     37,153  

Nonutility:

        

Proved E&P properties being amortized

   103     1,904  

Unproved E&P properties not being amortized

        8  

Merchant generation—nuclear

   1,217     1,107     1,163     1,108  

Merchant generation—other

   1,451     1,657  

Merchant generation—other(1)

   1,289     2,780  

Nuclear fuel

   762     720     775     847  

Other—including plant under construction

   1,117     947  

Other-including plant under construction

   1,265     1,102  

Total nonutility

   4,650     6,343     4,492     5,837  

Total property, plant and equipment

  $39,855    $39,036    $44,321    $42,990  

Virginia Power

        

Utility:

        

Generation

  $11,381    $11,105    $13,707    $11,793  

Transmission

   3,080     2,511     4,261     3,823  

Distribution

   7,879     7,568     8,701     8,231  

Nuclear fuel

   1,058     994     1,277     1,193  

General and other

   591     591     659     631  

Other—including plant under construction

   3,610     2,866  

Other-including plant under construction

   2,017     2,946  

Total utility

   27,599     25,635     30,622     28,617  

Nonutility—other

   8     8  

Nonutility-other

   9     9  

Total property, plant and equipment

  $27,607    $25,643    $30,631    $28,626  

Costs of unproved properties capitalized under the full cost method of accounting that were excluded from amortization at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were not material. There were no significant E&P properties under development, as defined by the SEC, excluded from amortization at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

(1)Amount includes $957 million due to consolidation of a VIE.
 

 

88   91

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

Volumetric Production Payment Transactions

During 2007, in conjunction with the sale of Dominion’s non-Appalachian E&P operations, Dominion paid $250 million to terminate their existing VPP agreements and retained the VPP royalty interests formerly associated with these agreements. Production from VPP royalty interests declined significantly in 2009, reflecting the expiration of these interests in February 2009.

Assignment of Marcellus Acreage

In 2008, Dominion completed a transaction with Antero to assign drilling rights to approximately 117,000 acres in the Marcellus Shale formation located in West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

Dominion received proceeds of approximately $347 million. The net proceeds were credited to Dominion’s full cost pool, reducing property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as the transaction did not significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of natural gas and oil. Under the agreement, Dominion received a 7.5% overriding royalty interest on future natural gas production from the assigned acreage and retained the drilling rights in traditional formations both above and below the Marcellus Shale. However, as a result of the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations, the overriding royalty interest was transferred to CONSOL.

Jointly-Owned Power Stations

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s proportionate share of jointly-owned power stations at December 31, 20102012 is as follows:

 

  Bath
County
Pumped
Storage
Station(1)
 North
Anna
Power
Station(1)
 Clover
Power
Station(1)
 Millstone
Unit 3(2)
   Bath
County
Pumped
Storage
Station(1)
 North
Anna
Units 1
and 2(1)
 Clover
Power
Station(1)
 Millstone
Unit 3(2)
 
(millions, except percentages)                    

Ownership interest

   60.0  88.4  50.0  93.5   60  88.4  50  93.5

Plant in service

  $1,022   $2,294   $562   $1,001    $1,024   $2,392   $568   $993  

Accumulated depreciation

   (474  (1,047  (178  (212   (521  (1,072  (192  (236

Nuclear fuel

       491        302         502        456  

Accumulated amortization of nuclear fuel

       (366      (206       (390      (272

Plant under construction

   1    246    8    56     27    77    6    36  

 

(1)StationUnits jointly owned by Virginia Power.
(2)Unit jointly owned by Dominion.

The co-owners are obligated to pay their share of all future construction expenditures and operating costs of the jointly-owned facilities in the same proportion as their respective ownership interest. Dominion and Virginia Power report their share of operating costs in the appropriate operating expense (electric fuel and other energy-related purchases, other operations and maintenance, depreciation, depletion and amortization and other taxes, etc.) in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

 

NOTE 12.11. GOODWILLAND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

In February 2010, Dominion completed the sale of Peoples to PNG Companies LLC and netted after-tax proceeds of approximately $542 million. The sale resulted in an after-tax loss of approximately $140 million, which included a $79 million write-off of goodwill.

In April 2010, Dominion completed the sale of substantially all of its Appalachian E&P operations to a newly-formed subsidiary of CONSOL for approximately $3.5 billion. The transaction resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $1.4 billion, which included a $134 million write-off of goodwill.

In December 2009, Dominion made the decision to retain Hope and include it with East Ohio in Dominion’s gas distribution business within the Dominion Energy segment. Goodwill was allocated from the Corporate and Other segment to the Dominion Energy segment based on the relative fair values of Hope and Peoples, which remained held-for-sale within the Dominion Corporate and Other segment. Dominion did not perform an interim impairment test in 2009 as no events occurred that would more-likely-than-not reduce the reporting units’ fair values below their carrying values.

The changes in Dominion’s carrying amount and segment allocation of goodwill are presented below:

 

    Dominion
Generation
  Dominion
Energy
  DVP   Corporate
and
Other
  Total 
(millions)                 

Balance at December 31, 2008(1)

  $1,455   $861   $1,091    $96   $3,503  

Reallocation due to segment realignment

       15         (15    

Business acquisition adjustment

   (117  (30       (2  (149

Balance at December 31, 2009(1)

  $1,338   $846   $1,091    $79   $3,354  

Business disposition adjustment

       (134       (79  (213

Balance at December 31, 2010(1)

  $1,338   $712   $1,091    $   $3,141  
    Dominion
Generation
   Dominion
Energy
  DVP   Corporate
and
Other
   Total 
(millions)                   

Balance at December 31, 2010(1)

  $1,338    $712   $1,091    $    $3,141  

Impairments/adjustments

                        

Balance at December 31, 2011(1)

  $1,338    $712   $1,091    $    $3,141  

Asset disposition adjustment

        (11            (11

Balance at December 31, 2012(1)

  $1,338    $701   $1,091    $    $3,130  

 

(1)Goodwill amounts do not contain any accumulated impairment losses.

92


 

Other Intangible Assets

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s other intangible assets are subject to amortization over their estimated useful lives. Dominion’s amortization expense for intangible assets was $82 million, $78 million and $107 million $155 millionfor 2012, 2011 and $95 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In 2010,2012, Dominion acquired $61 million of intangible assets, primarily representing software and emissions allowances, with estimated weighted-average amortization periods of approximately 5 years and 1 year, respectively. Amortization expense for Virginia Power’s intangible assets was $26 million, $26 million, and $28 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In 2010, Virginia Power acquired $20$102 million of intangible assets, primarily representing software, with an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 5approximately 19 years. Amortization expense for Virginia Power’s intangible assets was $22 million, $22 million and $26 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. In 2012, Virginia Power acquired $53 million of intangible assets, primarily representing software, with an esti-

mated weighted-average amortization period of 31 years. The components of intangible assets are as follows:

 

At December 31,  2010   2009   2012   2011 
  Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
 
(millions)                                

Dominion

                

Software and software licenses

  $651    $295    $657    $325  

Software, licenses and other

  $859    $327    $888    $278  

Emissions allowances

   134     50     229     74     5     1     80     53  

Other

   241     39     237     31  

Total

  $1,026    $384    $1,123    $430    $864    $328    $968    $331  

Virginia Power

                

Software and software licenses

  $251    $124    $265    $149  

Emissions allowances

   48     3     68     5  

Other

   56     16     53     15  

Software, licenses and other

  $303    $122    $285    $102  

Total

  $355    $143    $386    $169    $303    $122    $285    $102  

Annual amortization expense for these intangible assets is estimated to be as follows:

 

  2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017 
(millions)                                        

Dominion

  $81    $57    $46    $34    $27    $65    $56    $43    $37    $25  

Virginia Power

  $21    $20    $14    $11    $6    $20    $18    $12    $8    $5  

89


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

NOTE 13.12. REGULATORY ASSETSAND LIABILITIES

Regulatory assets and liabilities include the following:

 

At December 31,  2010   2009 
(millions)        

Dominion

    

Regulatory assets:

    

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(1)

  $174    $41  

Deferred transmission costs(2)

   76       

PIPP(3)

   44       

Unrecovered gas costs(4)

   39     52  

Virginia sales taxes(5)

   35     34  

Other

   39     43  

Regulatory assets-current

   407     170  

Unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs(6)

   987     968  

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(1)

   153       

PIPP(3)

        143  

Income taxes recoverable through future rates(7)

   90     75  

Deferred transmission costs(2)

   49     61  

Other postretirement benefit costs(8)

   29     36  

Other

   138     107  

Regulatory assets-non-current

   1,446     1,390  

Total regulatory assets

  $1,853    $1,560  

Regulatory liabilities:

    

Provision for rate proceedings(9)

  $79    $473  

Other

   56     63  

Regulatory liabilities-current

   135     536  

Decommissioning trust(10)

   391     324  

Provision for future cost of removal and AROs(11)

   830     766  

Derivatives(12)

   68     105  

Other

   103     20  

Regulatory liabilities-non-current

   1,392     1,215  

Total regulatory liabilities

  $1,527    $1,751  

Virginia Power

    

Regulatory assets:

    

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(1)

  $174    $41  

Deferred transmission costs(2)

   76       

Virginia sales taxes(5)

   35     34  

Other

   33     41  

Regulatory assets-current

   318     116  

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(1)

   153       

Income taxes recoverable through future rates(7)

   76     67  

Deferred transmission costs(2)

   49     61  

Other

   92     72  

Regulatory assets-non-current

   370     200  

Total regulatory assets

  $688    $316  

Regulatory liabilities:

    

Provision for rate proceedings(9)

  $79    $473  

Other

   30     18  

Regulatory liabilities-current

   109     491  

Provision for future cost of removal(11)

   622     562  

Decommissioning trust(10)

   391     324  

Derivatives(12)

   68     105  

Other

   93     4  

Regulatory liabilities-non-current

   1,174     995  

Total regulatory liabilities

  $1,283    $1,486  

At December 31, 2012  2011 
(millions)      

Dominion

  

Regulatory assets:

  

Unrecovered gas costs(1)

 $59   $48  

Deferred rate adjustment clause costs(2)

  55    113  

Virginia sales taxes(3)

  37    32  

Plant retirement(4)

  25    27  

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(5)

      249  

Derivatives(6)

      45  

Other

  27    27  

Regulatory assets-current

  203    541  

Unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs(7)

  1,210    887  

Deferred rate adjustment clause costs(2)

  173    107  

Income taxes recoverable through future rates(8)

  140    121  

Derivatives(6)

  105    49  

Other postretirement benefit costs(9)

  21    26  

Plant retirement(4)

  11    25  

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(5)

      122  

Other

  57    45  

Regulatory assets-non-current

  1,717    1,382  

Total regulatory assets

 $1,920   $1,923  

Regulatory liabilities:

  

PIPP(10)

 $100   $58  

Provision for rate proceedings(11)

  8    150  

Other

  28    35  

Regulatory liabilities-current

  136    243  

Provision for future cost of removal and AROs(12)

  985    901  

Decommissioning trust(13)

  501    399  

Other

  28    24  

Regulatory liabilities-non-current

  1,514    1,324  

Total regulatory liabilities

 $1,650   $1,567  

Virginia Power

  

Regulatory assets:

  

Deferred rate adjustment clause costs(2)

 $51   $113  

Virginia sales taxes(3)

  37    32  

Plant retirement(4)

  25    27  

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(5)

      249  

Derivatives(6)

      45  

Other

  6    13  

Regulatory assets-current

  119    479  

Deferred rate adjustment clause costs(2)

  127    70  

Income taxes recoverable through future rates(8)

  110    100  

Derivatives(6)

  105    49  

Plant retirement(4)

  11    25  

Deferred cost of fuel used in electric generation(5)

      122  

Other

  43    33  

Regulatory assets-non-current

  396    399  

Total regulatory assets

 $515   $878  

Regulatory liabilities:

  

Provision for rate proceedings(11)

 $7   $150  

Other

  25    28  

Regulatory liabilities-current

  32    178  

Provision for future cost of removal(12)

  763    687  

Decommissioning trust(13)

  501    399  

Other

  21    9  

Regulatory liabilities-non-current

  1,285    1,095  

Total regulatory liabilities

 $1,317   $1,273  
  (1)Primarily reflects deferred fuel expenses for the Virginia jurisdiction of Virginia Power’s generation operations, net of $63 million of damages awarded to Virginia Power for spent nuclear fuel costs through June 30, 2006 returned to customers but not yet received. See Notes 14 and 23 for more information.

93


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

  (2)Reflects deferrals under the electric transmission FERC formula rate and the deferral of transmission-related costs associated with Rider T. See Note 14 for more information.
(3)Under PIPP, eligible customers can receive energy assistance based on their ability to pay. The difference between the customer’s total bill and the PIPP plan amount is deferred and collected annually under the PIPP rider according to East Ohio tariff provisions. See Note 14 for more information regarding PIPP.
  (4)Reflects unrecovered gas costs at Dominion’s regulated gas operations, which are recovered through quarterly or annual filings with the applicable regulatory authority.
  (5)(2)Reflects deferrals under the electric transmission FERC formula rate and the deferral of costs associated with certain current and prospective rider projects. See Note 13 for more information.
  (3)Amounts to be recovered through an annual surcharge to reimburse Virginia Power for incremental sales taxes being incurred due to the repeal of the public service company sales tax exemption in Virginia.
  (4)Reflects costs anticipated to be recovered in base rates for certain coal units expected to be retired.
  (5)Primarily reflects deferred fuel expenses for the Virginia jurisdiction of Virginia Power’s generation operations. See Note 13 for more information.
(6)As discussed under Derivative Instruments in Note 2, for jurisdictions subject to cost-based rate regulation, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments result in the recognition of regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities as they are expected to be recovered from or refunded to customers.
  (7)Represents unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs expected to be recovered through future rates generally over the expected remaining service period of plan participants by certain of Dominion’s rate-regulated subsidiaries.
  (7)(8)Amounts to be recovered through future rates to pay income taxes that become payable when rate revenue is provided to recover AFUDC-equity and depreciation of property, plant and equipment for which deferred income taxes were not recognized for ratemaking purposes, including amounts attributable to tax rate changes.
  (8)(9)CostsPrimarily reflects costs recognized in excess of amounts included in regulated rates charged by Dominion’s regulated gas operations before rates were updated to reflect a change in accounting method for other postretirement benefit costs and the cost related to the accrued benefit obligation recognized as part of accounting for Dominion’s acquisition of CNG.costs.
  (9)(10)Under PIPP, eligible customers can receive energy assistance based on their ability to pay. The difference between the customer’s total bill and the PIPP plan amount is deferred and collected or returned annually under the PIPP rider according to East Ohio tariff provisions. See Note 13 for more information regarding PIPP.
(11)Reflects a reserve associated with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings.Biennial Review Order. See Note 1413 for more information.
(10)(12)Rates charged to customers by the Companies’ regulated businesses include a provision for the cost of future activities to remove assets that are expected to be incurred at the time of retirement.
(13)Primarily reflects a regulatory liability representing amounts collected from Virginia jurisdictional customers and placed in external trusts (including income, losses and changes in fair value thereon) for the future decommissioning of Virginia Power’s utility nuclear generation stations, in excess of the related ARO.
(11)Rates charged to customers by the Companies’ regulated businesses include a provision for the cost of future activities to remove assets that are expected to be incurred at the time of retirement.
(12)As discussed under Derivative Instruments in Note 2, for jurisdictions subject to cost-based rate regulation, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments result in the recognition of regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities as they are expected to be recovered from or refunded to customers.

At December 31, 2010,2012, approximately $81$319 million of Dominion’s and $22$240 million of Virginia Power’s regulatory assets represented past expenditures on which they do not currently earn a return. Dominion’s expenditures primarily include unrecovered gas costs. The aboveThese expenditures are expected to be recovered within the next two years.

 

 

NOTE 14.13. REGULATORY MATTERS

Regulatory Matters Involving Potential Loss Contingencies

As a result of issues generated in the ordinary course of business, Dominion and Virginia Power are involved in various regulatory matters. Certain regulatory matters may ultimately result in a loss; however, such matters are in an initial procedural phase, involve uncertainty as to the outcome of pending reviews or orders, or involve significant factual issues that need to be resolved, such that it is not possible for the Companies to estimate a range of possible loss. For such matters that the Companies cannot estimate, a statement to this effect is made in the description of the matter. Other matters may have progressed sufficiently through the regulatory process such that the Companies are able to esti-

90


mate a range of possible loss. For regulatory matters for which the Companies are able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses, an estimated range of possible loss is provided, in excess of the accrued liability (if any) for such matters. This estimated range is based on currently available information and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. This estimated range of possible loss does not represent the Companies’ maximum possible loss exposure. The circumstances of such regulatory matters will change from time to time and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate. For current matters not specifically reported below, management does not anticipate that the outcome from such matters would have a material effect on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s financial position, liquidity or results of operations. The following is a discussion of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s material pending and recent regulatory matters.

FERC—Electric

Under the Federal Power Act, FERC regulates wholesale sales and transmission of electricity in interstate commerce by public utilities. Virginia Power purchases and sells electricity in the PJM wholesale market and Dominion’s merchant generators sell electricity in the PJM, MISO and ISO-NE wholesale markets under Dominion’s market-based sales tariffs authorized by FERC. In addition, Virginia Power has FERC approval of a tariff to sell wholesale power at capped rates based on its embedded cost of generation. This cost-based sales tariff could be used to sell to loads within or outside Virginia Power’s service territory. Any such sales would be voluntary.

Rates

In April 2008, FERC granted an application for Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations to establish a forward-looking formula rate mechanism that updates transmission rates on an annual basis and approved an ROE of 11.4%, effective as of January 1, 2008. The formula rate is designed to recover the expected revenue requirement for each calendar year and is updated based on actual costs. The FERC-approved formula method, which is based on projected costs, allows Virginia Power to earn a current return on its growing investment in electric transmission infrastructure.

In July 2008, Virginia Power filed an application with FERC requesting a revision to its revenue requirement to reflect an additional ROE incentive adder for eleven electric transmission enhancement projects. Under the proposal, the cost of transmission service would increase to include an ROE incentive adder for each of the eleven projects, beginning the date each project enters commercial operation (but not before January 1, 2009). Virginia Power proposed an incentive of 1.5% for four of the projects (including the Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun and Carson-to-Suffolk lines, which were completed in 2011) and an incentive of 1.25% for the other seven projects. In August 2008, FERC approved the proposal, effective September 1, 2008, the incentives were included in the PJM Tariff, and billing for the incentives was made accordingly. In 2012, PJM canceled one of the eleven projects with an estimated cost of $7 million. The total cost for the other ten projects included in Virginia Power’s formula rate for 2013 is $852 million and the remaining projects were completed in 2012. Numerous parties sought rehearing of the FERC order in August 2008, and in May 2012 FERC denied

rehearing. In July 2012, the North Carolina Commission filed an appeal of the FERC orders granting the incentives with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Although Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of the appeal, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In March 2010, ODEC and NCEMC filed a complaint with FERC against Virginia Power claiming that approximately $223 million in transmission costs related to specific projects were unjust, unreasonable and unduly discriminatory or preferential and should be excluded from Virginia Power’s transmission formula rate. ODEC and NCEMC requested that FERC establish procedures to determine the amount of costs for each applicable project that should be excluded from Virginia Power’s rates. In October 2010, FERC issued an order dismissing the complaint in part and established hearings and settlement procedures on the remaining part of the complaint. In February 2012, Virginia Power submitted to FERC a settlement agreement to resolve all issues set for hearing. All transmission customer parties to the proceeding joined the settlement. The Virginia Commission, North Carolina Commission and Public Staff of the North Carolina Commission, while not parties to the settlement, have agreed to not oppose the settlement. The settlement was accepted by FERC in May 2012 and provides for payment by Virginia Power to the transmission customer parties collectively of $250,000 per year for ten years and resolves all matters other than allocation of the incremental cost of certain underground transmission facilities, which has been briefed pursuant to FERC’s May 2012 order and awaits FERC action. While Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of the briefing, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

PJM

In November 2011, PJM issued a formal notification that it would recalculate certain ancillary service revenues that had previously been paid during 2009, 2010 and 2011. Also in November 2011, PJM requested FERC permission to suspend its rebilling and repayment obligations associated with the recalculation of such revenues and petitioned FERC to establish a proceeding to determine the appropriate recalculations for the revenues during this period. In December 2011, FERC permitted the suspension of rebilling and repayment by PJM, subject to the outcome of FERC’s proceedings to determine the appropriate revenue recalculation. In April 2012, FERC issued an Order Establishing Hearing and Settlement Judge Procedures to address the appropriate recalculation of the ancillary service credits PJM will be required to collect from Virginia Power. In August 2012, PJM filed a settlement on behalf of itself, Virginia Power and the PJM Market Monitor. In November 2012, FERC approved the settlement resolving all issues in the proceeding. As of September 30, 2012, Virginia Power had accrued a liability of $33 million, and in January 2013, Virginia Power paid PJM approximately $33 million, resolving the matter.

Other Regulatory Matters

Electric Regulation in Virginia

Prior toThe enactment of the Regulation Act whichin 2007 significantly changed electricityelectric service regulation in Virginia Virginia Power’s Virginia jurisdictional base rates wereby instituting a modified cost-of-service rate model. With respect to be capped at 1999 levels until December 31, 2010, at which time Virginia was to convertmost classes of customers, the Regulation Act ended Virginia’s planned transition to retail competition for its electric supply service.

91


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The Regulation Act ended capped rates two years early, on December 31, 2008, at which time retail competition was made available only to individual retail customers with a demand of more than 5 MW and non-residential retail customers who obtain Virginia Commission approval to aggregate their load to reach the 5 MW threshold. Individual retail customers are also permitted to purchase renewable energy from competitive suppliers if their incumbent electric utility does not offer a 100% renewable energy tariff.

The Regulation Act also authorizes stand-alone rate adjustment clauses for recovery of costs for new generation projects, FERC-approved transmission costs, environmental compliance, conservation and energy efficiency programs and renewable energy programs. The Regulation ActIt provides for enhanced returns on capital expenditures on specific new generation projects, including but not limited to combined cycle gas generation, nuclear generation, clean coal/carbon capture compatible generation, and renewable generation projects. The Regulation Act also continues statutory provisions directing Virginia Power to file annual fuel cost recovery cases with the Virginia Commission. Legislation was enacted in February 2013 that amends the Regulation Act prospectively. SeeFuture Issues and Other Matters in Item 7. MD&A for a discussion of this legislation.

If the Virginia Commission’s future rate decisions, including actions relating to Virginia Power’s rate adjustment clause filings, differ materially from Virginia Power’s expectations, it may adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

2011 Biennial Review

Pursuant to the Regulation Act and the Virginia Settlement Approval Order, in March 2011, Virginia Power submitted its base rate filing and accompanying schedules in support of the first biennial review of its base rates, terms and conditions, as well as of its earnings for the 2009 and 2010 test period. The biennial review included a determination of whether Virginia Power’s earnings for the 2009 and 2010 combined test years were within 50 basis points of the authorized ROE of 11.9% established in the Virginia Settlement Approval Order, as well as authorization of an ROE which will be applicable to base rates and rate adjustment clauses and which will be used to measure base rate earnings during the 2013 biennial review proceeding. As a result of the Virginia Settlement Approval Order and the Regulation Act, Virginia Power’s base rates are not subject to change based on the 2011 biennial review. In November 2011, the Virginia Commission entered an orderissued the Biennial Review Order.

In the Biennial Review Order, the Virginia Commission declined to award a performance incentive for generating plant performance, customer service or operating efficiency in January 2009 initiating the 2009 Base Rate Review. In connection with the 2009 Base Rate Review, Virginia Power submitted base rate filings and accompanying schedules to2009-2010 biennial review. Instead, in March 2012, the Virginia Commission during 2009. issued an order initiating a rulemaking proceeding to develop specific performance metrics and nationally recognized standards for determining positive or negative performance incentives for electric utilities. Such incentive criteria would be applied in future biennial review proceedings.

In February 2010, Virginia Power filed a revised Stipulation and Recommendation withSeptember 2012, the Virginia Commission which hadissued an Order for Notice and Hearing in the support of all ofseparate rulemaking proceeding to develop specific performance standards based on nationally recognized standards for the interested parties, includingVirginia Commission’s consideration in determining positive or negative performance incentives for electric utilities. The Virginia Commission modified the proposed rules and regulations for performance incentives filed by the Staff of the Virginia Commission. Virginia Power’s fourth quarter 2009 results includedCommission, allowed for further comments by November 2012 on the proposed rules and regulations as modified, and held a charge of $782 million ($477 million after-tax) representing its best estimate at the time of the probable outcome of the 2009 Base Rate Review.public hearing in November 2012. In March 2010,January 2013, the Virginia Commission issued its order adopting revised performance incentive rules and regulations effective February 1, 2013.

Base ROE

The Virginia Commission determined that Virginia Power’s new authorized ROE is 10.9%, inclusive of a performance incentive of 50 basis points for meeting certain RPS targets. As discussed below, this ROE will serve as the ROE against which Virginia Power’s earned return will be compared for the test periods in the 2013 biennial review proceeding. The Virginia Commission ordered that the 50 basis point RPS performance incentive will not be included in the ROE applicable to any rate adjustment clauses.

In December 2011, Virginia Power filed a petition with the Virginia Commission seeking rehearing or reconsideration of the Biennial Review Order, to confirm the effective date of the newly authorized 10.9% base ROE. Virginia Power’s petition requested the Virginia Commission to confirm that the 10.9% ROE authorized in the Biennial Review Order would apply prospectively, effective following the date of the Biennial Review Order on November 30, 2011, and that Virginia Power’s previously-approved 11.9% base ROE authorized in the Virginia Settlement Approval Order that concludedwould be used to measure base rate earnings for the 2009 Base Rate Review and resolved open issues relatingperiod January 1, 2011 through November 30, 2011. In March 2012, the Virginia Commission issued an order denying Virginia Power’s petition seeking rehearing or reconsideration. Contrary to Virginia Power’s fuel factorposition, the Virginia Commission ruled that the new 10.9% ROE will be used to measure earnings for the entire 2011-2012 test period in the next biennial review in 2013, which is expected to be filed in March 2013.

Also in March 2012, Virginia Power filed Petitions for Appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia regarding the Biennial Review Order and Rider T. An the March 2012 Order. In May 2012, the Supreme Court of Virginia granted review of Virginia Power’s appeals from the Biennial Review Order and the March 2012 Order denying Virginia Power’s petition seeking rehearing or reconsideration, and heard oral argument on both appeals in September 2012. In November 2012, the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the Biennial Review Order and the March 2012 Order denying Virginia Power’s petition seeking rehearing or reconsideration.

ROE issue relatingApplicable to Riders C1, C2, R, and S

Effective December 1, 2011, the ROE applicable to Riders C1 and C2 was also resolved.is 10.4%. For Riders R and S, effective December 1, 2011, the ROE is 11.4%, inclusive of a statutory enhancement of 100 basis points.

Earned Return for 2009 and 2010

The Virginia Commission determined that Virginia Power earned an ROE of approximately 13.3% during the 2009 and 2010 combined test years, which exceeded the authorized ROE earnings band of 11.4% to 12.4% established in the Virginia Settlement Approval Order includedOrder. Based on the following provisions:determination that Virginia Power had excess earnings, the Virginia Commission ordered Virginia Power to refund 60% of earnings above the upper end of the authorized ROE earnings band, or approximately $78 million, to its customers, which was provided in the form of credits to customers’ bills amortized over a six-month period during 2012. A charge for the refund was recognized in operating revenues in the 2011 Consolidated Statement of Income. The actual

Credits from 2008 Revenues

 

Ÿ92 

Credits to customers of $400 million from Virginia Power’s 2008 revenues to be applied against base rates and rider charges.


aggregate refund amount totaled approximately $81 million, taking into account refunds to be paid to certain non-jurisdictional customers pursuant to their customer contracts.

Base Rates and Existing Riders T, C1, and C2

As a result of the Virginia Commission’s determination that credits will be applied to customers’ bills, the Virginia Commission, as required by the Regulation Act, directed Virginia Power to combine its existing Riders T, C1, and C2 with Virginia Power’s base costs, revenues and investments, and to file revised tariffs reflecting such combination pursuant to the Biennial Review Order. These Riders will thereafter be considered part of Virginia Power’s base costs, revenues and investments for purposes of future biennial review proceedings.

Ÿ

No change in Virginia Power’s base rates in existence prior to September 1, 2009 until December 1, 2013 (unless emergency rate relief is warranted by statute);

In April 2012, the Virginia Commission held that Riders C1 and C2 are now to be combined in Virginia Power’s base rates and are to be considered as part of its future biennial reviews. The Virginia Commission rejected Virginia Power’s requests to identify and separately track the revenues for these existing riders in base rates, and to preserve deferral accounting for these revenues in base rates, stating that such deferral accounting ceased December 1, 2011 for existing Riders C1 and C2.

In August 2012, the Virginia Commission confirmed that existing Rider T had been combined in base rates, and ruled that transmission costs would continue to be tracked separately to permit deferral accounting and dollar-for-dollar recovery of costs through Rider T and through Rider T1, a new increment/decrement rate adjustment clause to recover the difference in the revenue requirement for rate year costs and the revenues collected under Rider T.

Ÿ

Refund increased revenues collected under the interim base rates since September 1, 2009; and

Ÿ

An ROE of 11.9% (inclusive of a performance incentive of 60 basis points) for use in the Virginia Commission’s assessment in the upcoming biennial rate review of Virginia Power’s earnings.

FTR CreditsEarnings Test Adjustments

The Virginia Commission ruled on numerous contested proposals to adjust Virginia Power’s earnings for the 2009 and 2010 combined test periods. Among other adjustments, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s ratemaking treatment of fuel inventories held by its wholly-owned subsidiaries. As a result of this finding, Virginia Power included in rate base approximately $188 million in fuel inventory costs for 2010. The Virginia Commission also adopted Virginia Power’s treatment that includes, for regulatory earnings purposes, its AIP and LTIP expenses up to a 100% payout ratio. The Virginia Commission excluded from expense approximately $21 million in incentive plan costs that exceeded a payout ratio of 100%, allowing a net recovery of approximately $95 million of incentive compensation expense for the biennial review period. The Virginia Commission denied Virginia Power’s ratemaking treatment that expensed the entire cost of its 2010 voluntary separation plan in 2010, ruling instead to amortize the cost through the end of 2011. This matched the costs of the plan with the period of realization of savings, which reduced 2010 operating costs (and in turn, increased 2011 operating costs) by approximately $103 million for purposes of the earnings test. Other than influencing the amount earned above the authorized ROE earnings band, the earnings test adjustments above did not have an impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Ÿ

Credits to customers of $129 million, inclusive of any carrying charge, relating to revenues from FTRs for the period July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2009.

In addition, the Virginia Commission required Virginia Power to recognize a gain, for purposes of the earnings test, of approximately $44 million on the settlement of certain interest

rate hedging contracts in 2010, as opposed to amortizing the gains over the forecasted term of planned debt instruments that were not issued. Virginia Power determined that it was no longer probable that these derivative gains would be included in future base rates as the Virginia Commission would not allow the amortization of these amounts in future periods. As a result, Virginia Power removed approximately $50 million in December 2011 from regulatory liabilities and recognized the deferred derivative settlement gains in interest and related charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Virginia Fuel Expenses

In May 2012, Virginia Power submitted its annual fuel factor filing to the Virginia Commission, proposing a decrease of approximately $389 million in fuel revenue for the rate year beginning July 1, 2012. In September 2012, after a public hearing, the Virginia Commission issued an order approving Virginia Power’s filing.

Generation Riders R and S

In connection with the Bear Garden and Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center projects, in March 2011, the Virginia Commission approved annual updates for Riders R and S with revenue requirements of $78 million and $199 million, respectively, for the April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012 rate year, utilizing the 12.3% placeholder ROE (inclusive of a 100 basis point statutory enhancement) pending the Virginia Commission’s ROE determination in the 2011 biennial review.

In March 2012, the Virginia Commission approved annual updates for Riders R and S for the April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 rate year, utilizing an 11.4% ROE (inclusive of a 100 basis point statutory enhancement) consistent with the base ROE authorized in the Biennial Review Order. The Virginia Commission’s approvals authorized an approximately $74 million revenue requirement for Rider R, and an approximately $226 million revenue requirement for Rider S, comprised of approximately $52 million for the pre-commercial operation period and approximately $174 million for the commercial operation period.

In June 2012, Virginia Power requested Virginia Commission approval of its annual updates for Riders R and S for the next two consecutive rate years, utilizing an 11.4% ROE (inclusive of a 100 basis point statutory enhancement) consistent with the base ROE authorized in the Biennial Review Order and subject to true-up based on changes in the authorized ROE in future biennial review proceedings. For Rider R, Virginia Power proposed an approximately $81 million revenue requirement for the rate year beginning April 1, 2013 and an approximately $75 million revenue requirement for the rate year beginning April 1, 2014. For Rider S, an approximately $249 million revenue requirement was proposed for the rate year beginning April 1, 2013 and an approximately $229 million revenue requirement was proposed for the rate year beginning April 1, 2014. Virginia Power has agreed to certain adjustments supported by Virginia Commission Staff reducing the Rider R revenue requirements to approximately $78 million for the rate year beginning April 1, 2013, and approximately $72 million for the rate year beginning April 1, 2014. In February 2013, the Virginia Commission approved these cost recovery periods and amounts for Rider R, as well as a multi-year approach in which Virginia Power would file its next

93

 

Ÿ

An ROE of 12.3% (inclusive of a 100 basis point statutory enhancement) for the 2010 rate year.


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

update filing for Rider R in 2014. In January 2013, Virginia Power filed a proposed stipulation agreement reached with the Virginia Commission Staff supporting a revised revenue requirement for Rider S of approximately $248 million for the rate year beginning April 1, 2013. Virginia Power and the Staff of the Virginia Commission also agreed that Virginia Power would file a Rider S case in 2013 instead of a multi-year approach. The Rider S update proceeding is pending. Construction of the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center was completed and the facility commenced commercial operations in July 2012.

DSM Riders C1A and C2A

In April 2012, the Virginia Commission approved a revenue requirement of $5 million for Rider C1A and $17 million for Rider C2A. This approval incorporated four new energy efficiency DSM programs as a bundle for residential customers for a five-year period starting June 1, 2012, subject to a total $90 million cost cap. The Virginia Commission also approved two new energy efficiency DSM programs as a bundle for commercial customers for the same five-year period, subject to a total $45 million cost cap, as well as a new peak-shaving DSM program for commercial customers for the same five-year period, subject to an approximately $14 million cost cap.

In August 2012, Virginia Power requested extension of two DSM programs (the Residential Air Conditioner Cycling Program and the Residential Low Income Program) by five years and two years, respectively, beyond their current April 30, 2013 termination date, as well as approval of a process whereby the Staff could administratively approve limited modifications to the designs of previously approved DSM programs. Virginia Power’s proposed revenue requirements for Riders C1A and C2A for the May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014 rate year are $4 million and $23 million, respectively. This case is pending.

Transmission Riders T and T1

In May 2011, Virginia Power filed its annual update to Rider T with the Virginia Commission. The proposed $481 million annual revenue requirement, effective September 1, 2011, represented an increase of approximately $144 million over the revenue requirement associated with the Rider T customer rates previously in effect. In July 2011, the Virginia Commission issued an order approving a revenue requirement of $466 million for the September 1, 2011 to August 31, 2012 rate year. As discussed above, previously implemented Rider T will be considered part of Virginia Power’s base costs, revenues and investments for purposes of future biennial review proceedings. The Virginia Commission has initiated a proceeding to address further implementation of this directive.

In May 2012, Virginia Power filed Rider T1 with the Virginia Commission to recover costs of transmission service and demand response programs for the September 1, 2012 to August 31, 2013 rate year. The proposed Rider T1 reduction of approximately $100 million produces a total annual revenue requirement of approximately $373 million when netted with the revenue requirement of approximately $473 million associated with the Rider T customer rates currently in effect, and now combined in Virginia Power’s base rates. Virginia Power’s filing stated that Rider T costs combined in base rates should be identified and separately tracked, with the continuation of deferral accounting and dollar-for-dollar recovery for these costs. Virginia Power’s

proposed revenue requirement was supported by the Staff of the Virginia Commission, although the Staff concurrently proposed an alternative methodology for the Rider T1 revenue requirement which would represent an increase of approximately $18 million from the current Rider T customer rates. The Staff’s alternative methodology would have precluded deferral accounting and dollar-for-dollar recovery for Rider T in future periods.

In August 2012, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s proposed Rider T1 to recover costs of transmission service and demand response programs for the September 1, 2012 to August 31, 2013 rate year, ordering a Rider T1 reduction of approximately $100 million versus the Rider T customer rates currently in effect, and now combined in Virginia Power’s base rates. The Virginia Commission agreed with the approach recommended by Virginia Power and supported by the Staff of the Virginia Commission in this case. Rider T, which is now combined in base rates, along with Rider T1, and is being tracked separately to permit deferral accounting and dollar-for-dollar recovery.

Generation Rider W

In May 2011, Virginia Power requested approval from the Virginia Commission to construct and operate Warren County, as well as approval of Rider W. In February 2012, the Virginia Commission approved Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity for Warren County and related transmission facilities. The Virginia Commission also approved a revenue requirement of $34 million for the April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 rate year, reflecting an ROE of 11.4%, inclusive of a statutory enhancement of 100 basis points for Rider W, consistent with the Biennial Review Order. In addition, the Virginia Commission approved an ROE enhancement of 100 basis points for Rider W for a period of 10 years following commercial operations. The facility is expected to start commercial operations in late 2014.

Ÿ

Waiver of recovery, effective January 1, 2011, of deferred RTO start-up and administrative costs in the amount of $197 million (including carrying charges) that were previously approved for recovery through Rider T.

In June 2012, Virginia Power requested Virginia Commission approval of its annual update for Rider W for the April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014 rate year. Virginia Power proposed an approximately $86 million revenue requirement, utilizing an 11.4% ROE (inclusive of a 100 basis point statutory enhancement) also consistent with the base ROE authorized in the Biennial Review Order. In December, 2012, Virginia Power filed a proposed partial stipulation agreement reached with the Virginia Commission Staff supporting a revised revenue requirement for Rider W of approximately $83 million for the rate year commencing April 1, 2013. In February 2013, the Virginia Commission approved this revised revenue requirement.

Generation Rider B

In June 2011, Virginia Power filed applications with the Virginia Commission seeking regulatory approval to convert three of its coal-fired power stations to biomass. The applications included a request for approval of Rider B. To qualify for federal production tax credits associated with renewable energy generation, the power stations must commence operation as biomass generation facilities by December 31, 2013. Virginia Power requested Virginia Commission approval of the biomass conversions on a schedule that will enable qualification for these tax credits.

In March 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the conversion of the Altavista, Hopewell, and Southampton power stations to biomass. These conversions will increase Dominion’s

 

 

94    

 


 

 

DSM Riders C1renewable generation by more than 150 MW and C2are expected to be completed by the end of 2013.

Ÿ

An ROE of 11.3% for the 2010 rate year.

Commencing in 2011,As part of its approval, the Virginia Commission also approved Rider B. The approved revenue requirement for Rider B is approximately $6 million for the April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 rate year, utilizing a 12.4% ROE (inclusive of a 200 basis point statutory enhancement) consistent with the base ROE authorized in the Biennial Review Order. The renewable generating unit statutory enhancement of 200 basis points will conduct biennial reviewsapply during construction and the first five years of the service lives of the converted facilities.

In June 2012, Virginia Power requested Virginia Commission approval of its annual update for Rider B for the April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014 rate year. Virginia Power proposed an approximately $12 million revenue requirement, utilizing a 12.4% ROE (inclusive of a 200 basis point statutory enhancement) consistent with the base ROE authorized in the Biennial Review Order. In January 2013, Virginia Power filed a proposed stipulation agreement reached with the Virginia Commission Staff supporting approval of a revenue requirement for the pre-commercial operations date period and the post-commercial operations date period, resulting in an average recovery amount of approximately $12 million for the rate year commencing April 1, 2013. This case is pending.

Brunswick County Power Station and Generation Rider BW

In November 2012, Virginia Power requested approval from the Virginia Commission to construct and operate Brunswick County. The application included a request for approval of associated transmission facilities and Rider BW. Virginia Power’s proposed revenue requirement for Rider BW is approximately $45 million for the September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014 rate year, reflecting an ROE of 11.4%, inclusive of a statutory enhancement of 100 basis points for Rider BW, consistent with the Biennial Review Order. Virginia Power requested an ROE enhancement of 100 basis points for Rider BW for a period of 15 years following commercial operations. The facility is expected to begin commercial operations in spring 2016. This case is pending.

Bremo Power Station

In August 2012, Virginia Power requested approval from the Virginia Commission of an amended and reissued Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity that would allow Virginia Power to convert Bremo Units 3 and 4 from coal to natural gas as their fuel source. The proposed conversion would preserve 227 MW (net) of existing capacity and is expected to be complete in 2014. Cost recovery would occur through base rates, terms and conditions. not through a rate adjustment clause. This case is pending.

Solar Distributed Generation Demonstration Program

In the biennial review, as in the 2009 Base Rate Review, Virginia Power’s authorized ROE can be no lower than the average of that reported by not less than a majority of comparable utilities within the Southeastern U.S., with certain limitations as described in the Regulation Act. If Virginia Power’s earnings are more than 50 basis points above the authorized level, such earnings will be shared with customers.

October 2011, Virginia Power previously filed with the Virginia Commission an application for approvalto conduct a solar distributed generation demonstration program, consisting of up to a combined 30 MW of Company-owned solar distributed generation facilities to be located at selected commercial, industrial and cost recovery of eleven DSM programs, including one peak-shaving program and ten energy efficiency programs.community locations throughout its Virginia service territory. Virginia Power plansproposed to use DSM, alongconstruct and operate the Company-owned facilities in two phases, with its traditionalPhase I (up to 10 MW) from the date of approval through the end of 2013 and renewable supply-side resources,Phase II (up to meet its projected load growth over20 MW)

from the next 15 years. The DSM programs providebeginning of 2014 to the first steps toward achieving Virginia’s goalend of reducing, by 2022, the electric energy consumption2015. Virginia Power did not seek a rate adjustment clause for Phase I facilities with this filing; Phase I costs will be recovered as part of base rates in a future biennial review. Virginia Power’s retail customers by ten percent of what was consumed in 2006. Power indicated that it may seek a rate adjustment clause at a future time for Phase II costs.

In March 2010,November 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the recoveryvoluntary solar distributed generation demonstration program for Company-owned solar distributed generation facilities subject to a total cost cap of approximately $28$80 million for five of the DSM programs through initiation of Riders C1(including capital, financing, and C2, effectiveoperation and maintenance costs) which can be increased subject to future application based upon program experience, results, and data.

In May 1, 2010. With respect to the other six DSM programs for which approval was sought,2012, Virginia Power filed with the Virginia Commission made a finding that they were not inpetition to implement a special tariff for a combined 3 MW of customer-owned solar distributed generation facilities. Under the public interest at that time, but allowedproposed tariff, Rate Schedule SP, Virginia Power would purchase 100% of the opportunityenergy output from these facilities, including all environmental attributes and associated renewable energy credits, at a fixed price of $0.15 per kWh for further evaluationfive years. As proposed, the costs of similar programs. In July 2010, Virginia Power submitted its annual update filing for Riders C1 and C2 with respect to the five approved DSM programs. The proposed revenue requirements for Riders C1 and C2 were approximately $6 million and $18 million, respectively, which together represent a decrease of approximately $5 million compared to the revenue requirements included in Riders C1 and C2 customer rates currently in effect. In February 2011, an evidentiary hearing was held bypurchases under Rate Schedule SP would not be recovered from all customers. Following comments, the Virginia Commission onissued an order in November 2012 setting this matter for public hearing in February 2013. This case is pending.

Electric Transmission Projects

Portions of the Mt. Storm-to-Doubs line and certain associated facilities are approaching the end of their expected service lives and require replacement with new facilities to maintain reliable service. Virginia Power owns, and has been designated by PJM to rebuild, 96 miles of the line in West Virginia and Virginia, and The Potomac Edison Company owns, and has been designated by PJM to rebuild, the remaining three miles of the line in Maryland. In September 2011, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s updateapplication to rebuild its portion of Riders C1 and C2.the Mt. Storm-to-Doubs line. The approval of the West Virginia Commission was not required. Subject to applicable state and federal regulatory approvals, Virginia Power’s portion of the rebuild project is requiredexpected to issue its orderbe completed by March 30, 2011. Virginia Power plans to seekJune 2015.

In June 2010, the Virginia Commission approval for several DSM programs in 2011.

In connection withauthorized the Bear Gardenconstruction of the Hayes-to-Yorktown line along the proposed eight-mile route utilizing existing easements and Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center projects, in June 2010, Virginia Power filed annual updates for Riders R and S, respectively, with the Virginia Commission. Initially, Virginia Power proposed an approximately $86 million revenue requirement for Rider Rproperty previously acquired for the April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012 rate year. Due to the application of accelerated tax depreciation provisionstransmission line right-of-way. The Hayes-to-Yorktown line was placed in the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, passedservice in September 2010, Virginia Power revised the requested revenue requirement for Rider R in November 2010 from $86 million to $78 million. The adjusted $78 million revenue requirement represents an increase of approximately $14 million over the revenue requirement associated with the Rider R customer rates currently in effect. The proposed Rider S revenue requirement, effective April 1, 2011, for the rate year ending March 31, 2012 is approximately $200 million, which represents an increase of $46 million over the revenue requirement associated with the Rider S customer rates currently in effect. The ROE included in both rider filings is 12.3%, consistent with the terms of the Virginia Settlement Approval Order. December 2012.

In July 2010, the Virginia Commission issued

orders with respectauthorized Virginia Power to Riders R and S, which adopted a placeholder ROE of 11.3% (not includingconstruct the 100 basis point statutory enhancement) for use until the ROE is determined in the context of Virginia Power’s upcoming biennial review. Evidentiary hearings were held by the Virginia Commission on Riders R and S in December and November 2010, respectively.Radnor Heights Project. The Virginia Commission is required to issue its orders onstated that these proceedingslines and substation must be constructed and in service by MarchJune 30, 2011.

With respect to Virginia Power’s costs of transmission service, in June 2010, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Power’s annual update to Rider T which was effective September 1, 2010, reflecting the revenue requirement of approximately $338 million recommended by the Virginia Commission Staff2012, and agreed to by Virginia Power. The $338 million revenue requirement reflects an increase of approximately $118 million over the previous revenue requirement.

In April 2010,that Virginia Power filed its Virginia fuel factor application with the Virginia Commission. The application requested an annual decrease in fuel expense recovery of approximately $82 millioncould apply to extend this date for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. The proposed fuel factor went into effect on July 1, 2010 on an interim basis. An evidentiary hearing on Virginia Power’s application was held in September 2010, and ingood cause shown. In October 2010,2012, the Virginia Commission issued its finalan order approvingextending this construction and the reductionin-service date to July 31, 2013.

In January 2012, the Virginia Commission authorized the replacement at higher voltage of approximately 43 miles of existing transmission lines between the Dooms and Bremo substations. The Dooms-to-Bremo line is expected to be completed by May 2014.

In December 2011, Virginia Power submitted an application to the Virginia Commission for approval of the Waxpool-Brambleton-BECO line. This project is required to provide requested service to

95


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

a new data center campus in Loudoun County, Virginia. In December 2012, PJM authorized the Waxpool-Brambleton-BECO line as part of the 2012 RTEP and the Virginia Power’s fuel factor as proposed in its application.Commission authorized construction of the line. In January 2013, a notice of appeal was filed with the Supreme Court of Virginia by a private party regarding the December 2012 Order. Subject to the receipt of applicable state and federal regulatory approvals, the Waxpool-Brambleton-BECO line is expected to be completed by November 2013.

IfIn June 2012, Virginia Power requested Virginia Commission approval of the Surry-to-Skiffes Creek-to-Whealton lines. Subject to the receipt of applicable state and federal regulatory approvals, the Surry-to-Skiffes Creek-to-Whealton lines are expected to be completed by May 2015. Virginia Power also presented for the Virginia Commission’s future rate decisions, including actions relating to Virginia Power’s upcoming biennial review and rate adjustment clause filings, differ materiallyconsideration an approximately 37 mile alternate route for the 500 kV line from Virginia Power’s expectations,existing Chickahominy Substation to the proposed Skiffes Creek Switching Station.

In August 2012, Virginia Power requested Virginia Commission approval of the Harrisonburg-to-Endless Caverns line. In December 2012, the Virginia Commission authorized construction of the new line. Subject to the receipt of applicable state and federal regulatory approvals, the Harrisonburg-to-Endless Caverns line is expected to be completed by May 2015.

In November 2012, Virginia Power submitted an application to the Virginia Commission for approval to rebuild the Dooms-to-Lexington line in Virginia. Portions of the Dooms-to-Lexington line and certain associated facilities are approaching the end of their expected service lives and require replacement with new facilities to maintain reliable service. Virginia Power owns and has been designated by PJM as part of the 2012 RTEP to rebuild the 39 mile line in Rockbridge and Augusta Counties, Virginia. Subject to applicable state and federal regulatory approvals, the rebuild project is expected to be completed by May 2016.

North Anna Power Station

Virginia Power is considering the construction of a third nuclear unit at a site located at North Anna. However, Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit at North Anna and continues to evaluate its options regarding a new nuclear unit.

If Virginia Power decides to build a new unit, it could adverselymust first receive a COL from the NRC, the approval of the Virginia Commission and certain environmental permits and other approvals. Virginia Power has applied for and continues to pursue the COL from the NRC. Based on the current NRC schedule, the COL is expected no earlier than late 2015. Virginia Power also continues to pursue engineering and preliminary site development work, in addition to holding an Early Site Permit. In December 2011, Virginia Power acquired ODEC’s interest in the project, thereby terminating ODEC’s involvement in the development of a potential third unit at North Anna. In January 2013, the NRC approved the transfer of ODEC’s interest in the Early Site Permit to Virginia Power.

The NRC is required to conduct a hearing in all COL proceedings. In August 2008, the ASLB of the NRC permitted BREDL to intervene in the proceeding. In April 2011, BREDL’s then last remaining contention was dismissed by the ASLB, and following a decision by the NRC in June 2012, subsequently resulted in termination of the contested portion of the proceed-

ing. In September 2011, BREDL submitted a new proposed contention seeking to litigate issues related to the August 2011 Mineral, Virginia earthquake. In October 2011, the ASLB granted a motion filed by Virginia Power, with the consent of BREDL and the NRC staff to hold any ruling on this proposed contention in abeyance until Virginia Power completes an assessment of this earthquake. The NRC’s June 2012 decision referred this new proposed contention to the ASLB to consider whether the contested portion of the proceeding should be reopened. In July 2012, the ASLB granted BREDL a period of 60 days to submit a motion to reopen the proceeding from the time Virginia Power informs the NRC and parties that its seismic assessment is complete.

In addition, in June 2012, BREDL filed a petition with the NRC seeking to suspend the COL proceeding based on a June 2012 ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversing and remanding a 2010 NRC rulemaking that generically assessed the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage. Virginia Power opposed the petition. In July 2012, BREDL filed a motion with the NRC to reopen the contested portion of the COL proceeding to admit a contention pertaining to the same subject. Substantially identical suspension petitions and contentions were filed by various intervenor groups in other licensing proceedings pending before the NRC. In August 2012, the NRC issued a memorandum and order applicable to all pending licensing proceedings, including the North Anna COL proceeding. The NRC indicated that final licenses would not be issued until the issues raised in the court’s decision had been addressed. The NRC indicated that this determination extends only to final license issuance and that all licensing reviews and proceedings should continue to move forward. The NRC also directed that pending contentions on the topic be held in abeyance pending further NRC order. The NRC’s August 2012 decision is not expected to affect its resultsthe schedule for issuance of operations, financial conditionthe COL.

No other persons have sought to intervene in the proceeding. If a new contention is not admitted, the mandatory NRC hearing will be uncontested with respect to other issues. Virginia Power continues to pursue various environmental permits that would be needed to support future construction and cash flows.operation of a third nuclear unit at North Anna.

North Carolina Regulation

In December 2011, the North Carolina Commission issued an order approving a settlement agreement among Virginia Power, the Public Staff of the North Carolina Commission and other interested parties in Virginia Power’s fuel case for its North Carolina base rates have been subject toservice territory. The settlement agreement provided for a five-year base rate moratorium,$36 million increase in Virginia Power’s fuel revenues for one year, effective as of April 2005. Fuel rates continued to be subject to annual fuel rate adjustments, with deferred fuel accounting for over- or under-recoveriesJanuary 1, 2012, including approximately $13 million in under recovery of fuel costs.expenses for the previous fuel period.

In February 2010, in preparation for the end of the five-year base rate moratorium,March 2012, Virginia Power filed an application with the North Carolina Commission to increase its base rates and adjust its fuel rates. Virginia Power’s application included a proposal to recover proportionately more of its purchased power energy costs through fuel rates, which are adjusted annually, instead of being recovered in base rates. non-fuel revenues by approximately $64 million, with January 1, 2013 as the proposed effective date for the permanent rate revision.

In August 2010,2012, Virginia Power filed its annual fuel expense recovery application for a change in its fuel rates, which updated the fuel application of February 2010 to reflect a proposed decrease of approximately $28 million when compared to current fuel rates. Also in August 2010, Virginia Power updated its base rate application to seek a $27 million increase, instead of $29 million as originally proposed.

In September 2010, all parties to the base rate and fuel case except one, which did not oppose the settlement, filed an Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement and requested approval from the North Carolina Commission. In December 2010,testimony with the North Carolina Commission issued the North Carolina Settlement Approval Order. The North Carolina Settlement Approval Order authorizes an increase in base revenuesrequesting a total annual fuel revenue decrease of approximately $8$27 million from the fuel and fuel-related costs currently in effect. Virginia Power’s filing also sought to implement a one-year decrease in combined fuel revenues of approximately $32 million when compared to revenues produced fromtemporary voluntary rider, Rider A1, effective

 

 

96   95

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

current rates. November 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, to reduce projected over-collection of fuel expense in the second half of 2012.

In addition,August 2012 and October 2012, Virginia Power filed supplemental testimony in the base rate proceeding which had the cumulative effect of updating Virginia Power’s requested overall base non-fuel revenue increase to $53 million. In September 2012, the North Carolina Settlement Approval Order permitsCommission staff filed testimony recommending a non-fuel revenue increase of $24 million. In October 2012, the recovery through fuelNorth Carolina Commission issued a public notice stating that Virginia Power would begin billing under its proposed rates of 85% of the net energy costs of power purchases from both PJM and other wholesale suppliers and from the non-utility generatorsbeginning November 1, 2012 on an interim basis, subject to economic dispatch that do not provide actual cost data. Therefund with interest.

In December 2012, the North Carolina Settlement Approval Order authorizesCommission approved a $36 million increase in Virginia Power’s annual non-fuel base revenues based on an authorized ROE of 10.7%10.2%, and a capital structure composed$14 million decrease in annual base fuel revenues for a combined total base revenue increase of 49% long-term debt and 51% common equity. The new base and fuel rates$22 million. These rate changes became effective on January 1, 2011.2013 and are being appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court by multiple parties. In December 2012, Virginia Power established net regulatory assets of $17 million to be recovered over five to ten years in connection with these new rates.

Also, in December 2012, the North Carolina Commission approved a $17 million decrease in Virginia Power’s annual non-base fuel Experience Modification Factor revenues. The rate decrease is the result of the Commission’s approval of the Fuel-Related Stipulation of Settlement between the Public Staff and Virginia Power. The rate change was approved by the Commission after review of Virginia Power’s fuel expenses during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2012, and represents changes experienced by Virginia Power with respect to its reasonable costs of fuel and fuel component of purchased power.

Ohio and West Virginia Regulation

PIR Program

In March 2011, East Ohio filed a request with the fourth quarterOhio Commission to accelerate the PIR program by nearly doubling its PIR spending to more than $200 million annually. East Ohio identified 1,450 miles of 2008,pipeline that need to be replaced, in addition to the pipeline originally identified in the PIR project scope. East Ohio plans to accelerate the pace of the program by investing more resources in its infrastructure in the near term, in an effort to promote ongoing public safety and reduce operating costs over the longer term. In August 2011, the Ohio Commission approved an approximately $41 million annual revenue increase forthe stipulation by East Ohio, and a return on rate base that incorporates an ROEthe Staff of 10.38%. These changes were reflected in revised base rates commencing December 22, 2008.

In October 2008, the Ohio Commission approvedand other interested parties in East Ohio’s accelerated PIR proceeding. The stipulation provides for an increase in annual PIR capital investment from the current level of approximately $120 million stepping up to approximately $160 million by 2013. In addition, the stipulation provides for cost recovery for an initialover a five-year period commencing upon the approval of East Ohio’s 25-year PIR program to replace approximately 20% of its 21,000-mile pipeline system. the Ohio Commission.

In August 2010,February 2012, East Ohio filed its second annualsubmitted an application with the Ohio Commission to adjust the cost recovery charge for costs associated with itsPIR investments for the six months ended December 31, 2011. The filing was made in accordance with changes to the PIR program for actual costsapproved by the Ohio Commission in August 2011 and effects a return on investments made throughtransition from a fiscal year ending June 30 2010.to a calendar year for annual filings thereafter. The application reflectedappli-

cation includes total gross plant investment for the six-month July 1-December 31, 2011 transition period of $73 million, cumulative gross plant investment of $362 million, and a revenue requirement of approximately $28$47 million. In November 2010, the Ohio Commission approved a settlement agreement filedA stipulation was submitted by East Ohio, and the Staff of the Ohio Commission reflectingand the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel that supports the rates filed by East Ohio. The Ohio Commission issued an order approving the stipulation in April 2012.

In November 2012, East Ohio filed a revenue requirementnotice to adjust the PIR Cost Recovery Charge for 2012 costs. East Ohio expects to file its application to adjust the PIR Recovery Charge in the first quarter of approximately $27 million. Other interested parties to the case neither supported nor objected to the settlement agreement.2013.

PIPP Plus Program

Under the Ohio PIPP Plus program, eligible customers can receive energy assistance based on their ability to pay their bill. The difference between the customer’s total bill and the PIPP plan payment amount is deferred and collected under the PIPP rider in accordance with the rules of the Ohio Commission. Due to increased participation in the program and increases in gas costs in the period since the previous rider rate went into effect, unrecovered costs increased. Accordingly, in March 2010, the Ohio Commission approved a 12-month recovery of approximately $259 million of uncollected receivables associated with the PIPP program, comprised of accumulated PIPP arrearages of $163 million and projected arrearages of $96 million for the 12 months that the PIPP rider rate would be in effect. The PIPP rider rate went into effect in April 2010. The Ohio Commission directed East Ohio to file an application, with arrearages calculated on a calendar year basis, to update its PIPP rider within one year of implementation of the new PIPP rider rate and annually thereafter.

In November 2010, rule changes adopted by the Ohio Commission to the PIPP program became effective. The rule changes established a new program, PIPP Plus, which replaced PIPP. The PIPP Plus program reducessets the customer’s monthly payments from 10% toat 6% of household income and provides for forgiveness credits to the customer’s balance when required payments are received in full by the due date. Such credits may result in the elimination of the customer’s arrearage balance over 24 months.

In July 2012, the Ohio Commission approved East Ohio’s annual update of the PIPP Rider, which reflects the refund of an over-recovery of accumulated arrearages of approximately $70 million over the next two years and recovery of projected deferred program costs of approximately $104 million for the 12-month period from April 2012 to March 2013.

UEX Rider

East Ohio files an annual UEX Rider with the Ohio Commission, pursuant to which it seeks recovery of the bad debt expense of most customers not participating in the PIPP Plus.Plus Program. The UEX

Rider is adjusted annually to achieve dollar-for-dollar recovery of East Ohio’s actual write-offs of uncollectable amounts.

In 2010,July 2012, the Ohio Commission approved East Ohio deferred approximately $55 millionOhio’s annual update of the UEX Rider, which reflects the elimination of accumulated unrecovered bad debt expense of approximately $1 million as of March 31, 2012, and recovery of prospective bad debt expense projected to total approximately $23 million for the 12-month period from April 2012 to March 2013.

House Bill 95

Ohio enacted utility reform legislation under House Bill 95, which became effective in September 2011. This law updates natural gas legislation by enabling gas companies to include more up-to-date cost levels when filing rate cases. It also allows gas companies to seek approval of capital expenditure plans under which gas companies can recognize carrying costs on associated capital investments placed in service and can defer the carrying costs plus depreciation and property tax expenses for recovery throughfrom ratepayers in the UEX Rider.future. In December 2011, East Ohio filed an application requesting authority to implement a capital expenditure program under the new law, which, if approved, would enable East Ohio to defer as a regulatory asset carrying costs, depreciation and property tax associated with approximately $95 million in capital expenditures incurred between October

97


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

2011 and December 2012 for assets placed in service but not yet reflected in rates. The Ohio Commission approved East Ohio’s application in December 2012.

In October 2008, HopeDecember 2012, East Ohio filed an application requesting authority to implement a request with the West Virginia Commissioncapital expenditure program for an increase in the base rates it charges for natural gas service. The requested new base rates would have increased Hope’s revenues by approximately $342013 capital expenditures totaling $93 million, annually. In November 2009, the West Virginia Commission authorized an approximately $9 million increase in base rates. In June 2010, the West Virginia Commission authorized an additional base rate increase of less than $1 million to correct a miscalculation of rates attachedsubject to the November 2009 order.provisions approved for the initial application. This case is pending.

Federal Regulation

FERC—Gas

FERC regulates the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, as amended. Under the Natural Gas Act, FERC has authority over rates, terms and conditions of services performed by Dominion’s interstate natural gas company subsidiaries, including DTI and Cove Point. FERC also has jurisdiction over siting, construction and operation of natural gas import facilities and interstate natural gas pipeline facilities.

In May 2005,2011, Cove Point filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective July 1, 2011. In June 2011, FERC accepted a July 1, 2011 effective date for all proposed rates but two, for which the effective date was suspended from July 1 to December 1, 2011. In April 2012, Cove Point filed a stipulation and agreement among Cove Point, FERC trial staff and the other active parties in the rate case resolving all issues set for hearing by FERC and establishing the mechanism for operational purchases of LNG. In July 2012, FERC issued an order findingapproving the stipulation and agreement, including the settlement rates that PJM’s existing transmission service rate design may not be just and reasonable, and ordered an investigation and hearings onare effective April 1, 2012. The settlement was considered final in August 2012. Pursuant to the matter. In January 2008, FERC affirmed an earlier decision that the PJM transmission rate design for existing facilities had not become unjust and unreasonable. For recovery of costs of investments of new PJM-planned transmission facilities that operate at or above 500 kV, FERC established a regional rate design where all customers pay a uniform rate based on the costs of such investment. For recovery of costs of investment in new PJM-planned transmission facilities that operate below 500 kV, FERC affirmed its earlier decision to allocate costs on a beneficiary pays approach. A notice of appeal of this decision was filed in February 2008 at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In August 2009, the court denied the petition for review concerning the rate design for existing facilities, but granted the petition concerning the rate design for new facilities that operate at or above 500 kV, and remanded the issue of existing facilities back to FERC for further proceedings. Although Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the outcometerms of the FERC proceedings on remand, the impactsettlement, future operational purchases of any PJM rate design changes on the Companies’ results of operations is not expected to be material.

In April 2008, FERC granted an application for Virginia Power’s electric transmission operations to establish a forward-looking formula rate mechanism that updates transmission rates on an annual basis and approved an ROE of 11.4%, effective as of January 1, 2008. The formula rate is designed to recover the expected revenue requirement for each calendar year and is updated based on actual costs. The FERC-approved formula method, which is based on projected costs, allows Virginia Power to earn a current return on its growing investment in electric transmission infrastructure.

In July 2008, Virginia Power filed an application with FERC requesting a revision to its revenue requirement to reflect an additional ROE incentive adder for eleven electric transmission enhancement projects. Under the proposal, the cost of transmission service would increase to include an ROE incentive adder for each of the eleven projects, beginning the date each project enters commercial operation (but not before January 1, 2009). Virginia Power proposed an incentive of 1.5% for four of the projects (including the Meadow Brook-to-Loudoun line and Carson-to-Suffolk line) and an incentive of 1.25% for the other seven projects. In August 2008, FERC approved the proposal, effective September 1, 2008. The total cost for all eleven projects

96


is estimated at $877 million, and all projects are currently expected to be completed by 2012. Numerous parties sought rehearing of the FERC order in August 2008 and rehearing is pending. Although Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of the rehearing, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In March 2010, ODEC and NCEMC filed a complaint with FERC against Virginia Power claiming that approximately $223 million in transmission costs related to specific projects were unjust, unreasonable and unduly discriminatory or preferential and should be excluded from Virginia Power’s transmission formula rate. ODEC and NCEMC requested that FERC establish procedures to determine the amount of costs for each applicable project that should be excluded from Virginia Power’s rates. In October 2010, FERC issued an order dismissing the complaint in part and established hearings and settlement procedures on the remaining part of the complaint. While Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In May 2008, the RPM Buyers filed a complaint with FERC claiming that PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model’s transitional auctions have produced unjust and unreasonable capacity prices. The RPM Buyers requested that a refund effective date of June 1, 2008 be established and that FERC provide appropriate relief from unjust and unreasonable capacity charges within 15 months. In September 2008, FERC dismissed the complaint. The RPM Buyers requested rehearing of the FERC order in October 2008 and rehearing was denied in June 2009. A notice of appeal was filed in August 2009 by the Maryland Public Service Commission and the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In November 2009, the Court transferred the appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In February 2011, the Court of Appeals denied the petition for review, concluding that FERC had adequately explained why the rates were just and reasonable.

Dominion and Virginia Power plan and operate their facilities in compliance with approved NERC reliability requirements. Dominion and Virginia Power employees participate on various NERC committees, track the development and implementation of standards, and maintain proper compliance registration with NERC’s regional organizations. Dominion and Virginia Power anticipate incurring additional compliance expenditures over the next several years as a result of the implementation of new cyber security programs as well as efforts to ensure appropriate facility ratings for Virginia Power’s transmission lines. In October 2010, NERC issued an industry alert identifying possible discrepancies between the design and actual field conditions of transmission facilities as a potential reliability issue. The alert recommends that entities review their current facilities rating methodology to verify that the methodology is based on actual field conditions, rather than solely on design documents, and to take corrective action if necessary. Virginia Power is evaluating its transmission facilities for any discrepancies between design and actual field conditions.

In addition, NERC has requested the industry to increase the number of assets subject to NERC reliability standards that are designated as critical assets, including cyber security assets. While Dominion and Virginia Power expect to incur additional compliance costs in connection with the above NERC requirements and initiatives, such expensesLNG are not expected to significantly affect Cove Point’s net results of operations.

Dominion Transmission Rates

In December 2007, DTI Cove Point and the IOGA entered intosettling customers will be subject to a settlement agreement on DTI’s gathering and processing rates, which DTI and IOGA agreed in May 2010 to extendrate moratorium through December 31, 2014. DTI, at2016. Cove Point is required to file its option, may electnext rate case in 2016 with rates to extend the agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2015. The settlement extension maintains the gas retainage fee structure that DTI has had since 2001. The rates are 10.5% for gathering and 0.5% for processing. Under the settlement, DTI continues to retain all revenues from its liquids sales, thus maintaining cash flow from the liquids business. DTI will file the negotiated rates associated with the agreement extension with FERC in December 2011.be effective January 1, 2017.

 

 

NOTE 15.14. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

AROs represent obligations that result from laws, statutes, contracts and regulations related to the eventual retirement of certain of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s long-lived assets. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s AROs are primarily associated with the decommissioning of their nuclear generation facilities. In addition, Dominion’s AROs include plugging and abandonment of gas and oil wells, interim retirements of natural gas gathering, transmission, distribution and storage pipeline components, and the future abatement of asbestos expected to be disturbed in the Companies’ generation facilities.

The Companies have also identified, but not recognized, AROs related to retirement of Dominion’s LNG facility, Dominion’s gas storage wells in its underground natural gas storage network, certain Virginia Power electric transmission and distribution assets located on property with easements, rights of way, franchises and lease agreements, Virginia Power’s hydroelectric generation facilities and the abatement of certain asbestos not expected to be disturbed in the Companies’ generation facilities. The Companies currently do not have sufficient information to estimate a reasonable range of expected retirement dates for any of these assets since the economic lives of these assets can be

extended indefinitely through regular repair and maintenance and they currently have no plans to retire or dispose of any of these assets. As a result, a settlement date is not determinable for these assets and AROs for these assets will not be reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements until sufficient information becomes available to determine a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the activities to be performed. The Companies continue to monitor operational and strategic developments to

97


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

identify if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate a retirement date for these assets. The changes to AROs during 20092011 and 20102012 were as follows:

 

  Amount   Amount 
(millions)        

Dominion

     

AROs at December 31, 2008(1)

  $1,822  

AROs at December 31, 2010(1)

  $1,591  

Obligations incurred during the period

   14     16  

Obligations settled during the period

   (13   (16

Revisions in estimated cash flows(2)

   (304   (277

Accretion

   88     84  

Other

   7  

AROs at December 31, 2009(1)

  $1,614  

AROs at December 31, 2011(1)

  $1,398  

Obligations incurred during the period

   1     24  

Obligations settled during the period

   (9   (13

Revisions in estimated cash flows

   5  

Revisions in estimated cash flows(3)

   242  

Accretion

   85     77  

Obligations relieved due to sale of Appalachian E&P operations

   (105

AROs at December 31, 2010(1)

  $1,591  

Other

   (23

AROs at December 31, 2012(1)

  $1,705  

Virginia Power

     

AROs at December 31, 2008(3)

  $717  

AROs at December 31, 2010(4)

  $672  

Obligations incurred during the period

   10  

Obligations settled during the period

   (3

Revisions in estimated cash flows(2)

   (115   (90

Accretion

   35     36  

AROs at December 31, 2009(3)

  $637  

AROs at December 31, 2011(4)

  $625  

Obligations incurred during the period

   18  

Obligations settled during the period

   (1

Revisions in estimated cash flows(5)

   41  

Accretion

   35     34  

AROs at December 31, 2010(3)

  $672  

Other

   (12

AROs at December 31, 2012

  $705  

 

(1)Includes $20$14 million, $9$15 million and $14$64 million reported in other current liabilities at December 31, 2008, 2009,2010, 2011, and 2010,2012, respectively.
(2)Primarily reflects updated decommissioning cost studies and applicable escalation rates received for the Companies’ nuclear facilities during the second quartereffect of 2009. For Dominion, also includes a $103 million ($62 million after-tax) reduction in other operations and maintenance expenselower anticipated costs due to a downward revision in the nuclear decommissioning ARO for a power station unit that is no longer in service.expected future recovery from the DOE of certain spent fuel storage costs.
(3)Primarily reflects the accelerated timing of the decommissioning of Kewaunee to begin in 2013.
(4)Includes $2 million, $1$3 million and $3$1 million reported in other current liabilities at December 31, 2008, 20092010 and 2010,2011, respectively.
(5)Primarily reflects the effect of higher anticipated nuclear decommissioning costs.

Dominion and Virginia Power have established trusts dedicated to funding the future decommissioning of their nuclear plants. At December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, the aggregate fair value of Dominion’s trusts, consisting primarily of equity and debt securities, totaled $2.9$3.3 billion and $2.6$3.0 billion, respectively. At December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, the aggregate fair value of Virginia Power’s trusts, consisting primarily of debt and equity securities, totaled $1.3$1.5 billion and $1.2$1.4 billion, respectively.

 

NOTE 16.15. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE and to disclose certain information about its significant

98


variable interests in the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both 1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and 2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Virginia Power has long-term power and capacity contracts with four non-utility generators with an aggregate summer generation capacity of approximately 974870 MW. These contracts contain certain variable pricing mechanisms in the form of partial fuel reimbursement that Virginia Power considers to be variable interests. After an evaluation of the information provided by these entities, Virginia Power was unable to determine whether they were VIEs. However, the information they provided, as well as Virginia Power’s knowledge of generation facilities in Virginia, enabled Virginia Power to conclude that, if they were VIEs, it would not be the primary beneficiary. This conclusion reflects Virginia Power’s determination that its variable interests do not convey the power to direct the most significant activities that impact the economic performance of the entities during the remaining terms of Virginia Power’s contracts and for the years the entities are expected to operate after its contractual relationships expire. The contracts expire at various dates ranging from 2015 to 2021. Virginia Power is not subject to any risk of loss from these potential VIEs other than its remaining purchase commitments which totaled $1.5$1.1 billion as of December 31, 2010.2012. Virginia Power paid $213$214 million, $210$211 million, and $205$213 million for electric capacity and $164$83 million, $117$125 million, and $196$164 million for electric energy to these entities for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As discussed in Note 25, DCI held an investment in the subordinated notes of a third-party CDO entity. Dominion previously concluded that the CDO entity was a VIE and that DCI was the primary beneficiary of the CDO entity, which Dominion consolidated at December 31, 2007. In March 2008, Dominion entered into an agreement to sell its remaining interest in the subordinated notes effectively eliminating the variability of its interest, and therefore deconsolidated the CDO entity as of March 31, 2008.

Virginia Power purchased shared services from DRS, an affiliated VIE, of approximately $465$328 million, $416$389 million, and $397$465 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, respectively. Virginia Power determined that it is not the most closely associated entity with DRS and therefore not the primary beneficiary. DRS provides accounting, legal, finance and certain administrative and technical services to all Dominion subsidiaries, including Virginia Power. Virginia Power has no obligation to absorb more than its allocated share of DRS costs.

Dominion leases the Fairless generating facility in Pennsylvania from Juniper, the lessor, which began commercial operations in June 2004. Dominion makes annual lease payments of approximately $53 million. The lease expires in 2013 and, at that time, Dominion may renew the lease on terms mutually agreeable to Dominion and Juniper based on original project costs and current market conditions; purchase Fairless for approximately $923 million or sell Fairless, on behalf of Juniper, to an independent third party. If Fairless is sold and the proceeds from the sale are less than its original construction cost, Dominion would be required to make a payment to the lessor in an amount up to 70.75% of the original project costs adjusted for certain other costs as specified in the lease. The lease agreement does not contain any provisions that involve credit rating or stock price trigger events. Dominion expects to purchase Fairless when the lease expires in the third quarter of 2013.

Juniper was formed in 2003 as a limited partnership and was organized for the purpose of acquiring and constructing a number of assets for lease. Such assets were financed with proceeds from the issuance of bank debt, privately placed long-term debt and partnership capital received from Juniper’s general and limited

partners. Dominion has no voting equity interest in Juniper. Because Juniper had been subject to the business scope exception, Dominion was not required to evaluate whether Juniper was a VIE prior to October 2011.

98

Through September 30, 2011, Juniper held various power plant leases, including Fairless. In October 2011, the last lease other than Fairless expired and the related asset was sold by Juniper. With Fairless being its sole remaining asset, Juniper no longer qualified as a business as of October 2011, which required that Dominion determine whether Juniper is a VIE. Dominion concluded Juniper is a VIE because the entity’s capitalization is insufficient to support its operations, the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity is not held by the equity holders, and Dominion, through its residual value guarantee discussed above, guarantees a portion of the residual value of Fairless. The activities that most significantly impact Juniper’s economic performance relate to the operation of Fairless. The decisions related to the operations of Fairless are made by Dominion and as such, Dominion is considered the primary beneficiary.


Accordingly, Dominion consolidated Juniper in October 2011 and recorded, at fair value, approximately $957 million of property, plant and equipment, $896 million of debt and $61 million of noncontrolling interests. The debt is non-recourse to Dominion and is secured by Juniper’s assets. The annual lease payments made by Dominion to Juniper for Fairless are now eliminated in the Consolidated Statements of Income and are excluded from the lease commitments table in Note 22.

Dominion has not provided any financial or other support to Juniper in the current period that it was not previously contractually required to provide.

 

 

NOTE 17.16. SHORT-TERM DEBTAND CREDIT AGREEMENTS

Dominion and Virginia Power use short-term debt to fund working capital requirements and as a bridge to long-term debt financings. The levels of borrowing may vary significantly during the course of the year, depending upon the timing and amount of cash requirements not satisfied by cash from operations. In addition, Dominion utilizes cash and letters of credit to fund collateral requirements. Collateral requirements are impacted by commodity prices, hedging levels, Dominion’s credit ratings and the credit quality of its counterparties. Dominion and Virginia Power replaced certain of their existing credit facilities in September 2010, as noted below.

99


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

DOMINION

Commercial paper bank loans, and letters of credit outstanding, as well as capacity available under credit facilities, were as follows:

 

At

December 31,

  Facility
Limit
   Out-
standing
Commercial
Paper
  Out-
standing
Bank
Borrowings
  Out-
standing
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)                  

2010

        

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $3,000    $1,386   $   $101    $1,513  

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(2)

   500             35     465  

Total

  $3,500    $1,386(6)  $   $136    $1,978  

2009

        

Five-year joint revolving credit facility(3)

  $2,872    $442   $   $153    $2,277  

Five-year Dominion credit facility(4)

   1,700     353    500    19     828  

Five-year Dominion bilateral facility(5)

   200             32     168  

Total

  $4,772    $795(6)  $500(7)  $204    $3,273  
At
December 31,
  Facility
Limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

2012

       

Joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $3,000    $2,412   $ —    $588  

Joint revolving credit facility(2)

   500         26     474  

Total

  $3,500    $2,412(3)  $26    $1,062  

2011

       

Joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $3,000    $1,814   $    $1,186  

Joint revolving credit facility(2)

   500         36     464  

Total

  $3,500    $1,814(3)  $36    $1,650  

 

(1)This credit facilityEffective September 2012, the maturity date was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings and the issuance of commercial paper, as well as to support up to $1.5 billion of letters of credit.
(2)ThisEffective September 2012, the maturity date for $400 million of the $500 million in committed capacity of this credit facility was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. The remaining $100 million continues to have a maturity date of September 2016. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings, commercial paper and letter of credit issuances.
(3)This credit facility was entered into in February 2006 and terminated in September 2010. This credit facility was used to support bank borrowings, commercial paper and letter of credit issuances.
(4)This credit facility was entered into in August 2005 and terminated in August 2010. This facility was used to support bank borrowings, the issuance of letters of credit and commercial paper.
(5)This facility was entered into in December 2005 and terminated in December 2010. This credit facility was used to support commercial paper and letter of credit issuances.
(6)The weighted-average interest rates of the outstanding commercial paper supported by Dominion’s credit facilities were 0.41%0.49% and 0.30%0.47% at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.
(7)The weighted-average interest rate of the outstanding bank borrowings supported by Dominion’s credit facilities was 0.33% at December 31, 2009.

VIRGINIA POWER

Virginia Power’s short-term financing is supported by two three-year joint revolving credit facilities with Dominion. These credit facilities are being used for working capital, as support for the combined commercial paper programs of Dominion and Virginia Power and for other general corporate purposes.

Virginia Power’s share of commercial paper bank loans, and letters of credit outstanding, as well as its capacity available under its joint credit facilities with Dominion, were as follows:

 

At

December 31,

  Facility
Sub-limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

2010

       

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $1,000    $600   $91    $309  

Three-year joint revolving credit facility(2)

   250              250  

Total

  $1,250    $600(3)  $91    $559  
At December 31,  Facility
Sub-limit
   Outstanding
Commercial
Paper
  Outstanding
Letters of
Credit
   Facility
Sub-Limit
Capacity
Available
 
(millions)               

2012

       

Joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $1,000    $992   $    $8  

Joint revolving credit facility(2)

   250         2     248  

Total

  $1,250    $992(3)  $2    $256  

2011

       

Joint revolving credit facility(1)

  $1,000    $894   $    $106  

Joint revolving credit facility(2)

   250         15     235  

Total

  $1,250    $894(3)  $15    $341  

 

(1)This credit facilityEffective September 2012, the maturity date was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings and the issuance of commercial paper, as well as to support up to $1.5 billion (or the sub-limit, whichever is less) of letters of credit. Virginia Power’s current sub-limit under this credit facility can be increased or decreased multiple times per year.
(2)ThisEffective September 2012, the maturity date for $400 million of the $500 million in committed capacity of this credit facility was entered into inextended from September 2010 and terminates in2016 to September 2013.2017. The remaining $100 million continues to have a maturity date of September 2016. This credit facility can be used to support bank borrowings, commercial paper and letter of credit issuances. Virginia Power’s current sub-limit under this credit facility can be increased or decreased multiple times per year.
(3)The weighted-average interest raterates of the outstanding commercial paper supported by these credit facilities was 0.41%were 0.47% and 0.46% at December 31, 2010.2012 and 2011, respectively.

At December 31, 2009, Virginia Power had $442 million of commercial paper and $104 million of letters of credit outstanding under a five-year, $2.8 billion joint credit facility with Dominion and the weighted-average interest rate of its outstanding commercial paper was 0.28%. This credit facility was entered into in February 2006 and terminated in September 2010. This credit facility was used to support bank borrowings, commercial paper and letter of credit issuances.

In addition to the credit facility commitments mentioned above, Virginia Power also has a three-year $120 million credit facility thatfacility. Effective September 2012, the maturity date was entered into inextended from September 2010. The2016 to September 2017. This facility which terminates in September 2013, supports certain tax-exempt financings of Virginia Power.

 

 

100   99

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

 

NOTE 18.17. LONG-TERM DEBT

 

At December 31,  2010
Weighted-
average
Coupon(1)
 2010 2009   2012
Weighted-
average
Coupon(1)
 2012 2011 
(millions, except percentages)                

Virginia Electric and Power Company(2):

    

Virginia Electric and Power Company:

    

Unsecured Senior Notes:

        

4.5% to 5.25%, due 2010 to 2015

   5.01 $1,200   $1,430  

3.45% to 8.875%, due 2016 to 2038

   6.12  4,694    4,408  

Tax-Exempt Financings:(3)

    

4.75% to 8.625%, due 2012 to 2017

   5.50 $1,706   $2,321  

2.95% to 8.875%, due 2018 to 2038

   5.83  4,008    3,558  

Tax-Exempt Financings(2):

    

Variable rates, due 2016 to 2041

   1.25  219    119     1.14  454    454  

7.65%, due 2010

        1  

1.375% to 6.5%, due 2017 to 2040

   4.25  608    503  

1.5% to 6.5%, due 2017 to 2040

   3.65  508    533  

Virginia Electric and Power Company total principal

   $6,721   $6,461     $6,676   $6,866  

Securities due within one year(4)

   7.74  (15  (245

Securities due within one year

   4.88  (418  (616

Unamortized discount and premium, net

    (4  (3    (7  (4

Virginia Electric and Power Company total long-term debt

   $6,702   $6,213     $6,251   $6,246  

Dominion Resources, Inc.:

        

Unsecured Senior Notes:

        

2.25% to 8.125%, due 2010 to 2015

   5.14 $1,901   $2,029  

5.2% to 8.875%, due 2016 to 2038(5)

   6.34  4,193    4,193  

Variable rate, due 2010

        300  

Unsecured Convertible Senior Notes, 2.125%, due 2023(6)

    202    202  

Variable rate, due 2013

   0.41 $400   $  

1.4% to 7.195%, due 2012 to 2017

   3.72  3,041    3,545  

2.75% to 8.875%, due 2018 to 2042(3)

   5.71  5,099    4,399  

Unsecured Convertible Senior Notes, 2.125%, due 2023(4)

    82    143  

Unsecured Junior Subordinated Notes Payable to Affiliated Trusts, 7.83% and 8.4%, due 2027 and 2031

   7.85  268    268     7.85  268    268  

Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes, 6.3% to 8.375%, due 2064 and 2066

   7.51  1,469    1,485  

Unsecured Debentures and Senior Notes(7):

    

5.0% to 6.85%, due 2010 to 2014

   5.58  1,091    1,291  

Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes:

    

7.5% and 8.375%, due 2064 and 2066

   8.11  985    985  

Variable rate, due 2066(5)

   2.77  380    468  

Unsecured Debentures and Senior Notes(6):

    

5.0% and 6.625%, due 2013 and 2014

   5.06  622    622  

6.8% and 6.875%, due 2026 and 2027

   6.81  89    89     6.81  89    89  

Dominion Energy, Inc.(8):

    

Secured Senior Note, 7.33%, due 2020(9)

    171    183  

Tax-Exempt Financings, 5.0% and 5.75%, due 2033 to 2042

   5.30  124    124  

Dominion Energy, Inc.:

    

Secured Senior Notes:

    

5.03% to 5.78%, due 2013(7)

   5.07  842    842  

7.33%, due 2020(8)

    145    159  

Tax-Exempt Financings(9):

    

2.25% to 5.75%, due 2033 to 2042

   3.34  284    284  

Variable rate, due 2041

   1.16  75    75  

Virginia Electric and Power Company total principal (from above)

    6,721    6,461      6,676    6,866  

Dominion Resources, Inc. total principal

   $16,229   $16,625     $18,988   $18,745  

Fair value hedge valuation(10)

    49    23      93    105  

Securities due within one year(11)

   6.35  (497  (1,137   4.53  (2,223  (1,479

Unamortized discount and premium, net

    (23  (30    (7  23  

Dominion Resources, Inc. total long-term debt

   $15,758   $15,481     $16,851   $17,394  

 

(1)Represents weighted-average coupon rates for debt outstanding as of December 31, 2010.2012.
(2)$160 million of tax-exempt bonds due in 2040 issued by the Industrial Development Authority of Wise County on behalf of Virginia Power in December 2010 and September 2009 are not included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets because the bonds have been purchased and are held by Virginia Power. The bonds will be remarketed to third parties at a later date.
(3)These financings relate to certain pollution control equipment at Virginia Power’s generating facilities. Certain variable rate tax-exempt financings are supported by a $120 million three-year credit facility that terminates in September 2013.2017.
(4)Includes $1 million of unamortized discount in 2009.
(5)(3)At the option of holders, $510 million of Dominion’s 5.25% senior notes due 2033 and $600 million of Dominion’s 8.875% senior notes due 2019 are subject to redemption at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest in August 2015 and January 2014, respectively.
(6)(4)Convertible into a combination of cash and shares of Dominion’s common stock at any time when the closing price of common stock equals 120% of the applicable conversion price or higher for at least 20 out of the last 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous calendar quarter. At the option of holders on December 15, 2011, 2013 or 2018, these securities are subject to redemption at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. These securities are currently non-callablesenior notes have been callable by Dominion untilsince December 15, 2011.
(7)(5)In September 2011, the $500 million 6.3% September 2006 hybrids began bearing interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.3%, reset quarterly.
(6)Represents debt assumed by Dominion from the merger of its former CNG subsidiary.
(8)(7)$235Juniper notes issued in 2004 and consolidated in October 2011 due to Dominion becoming the primary beneficiary of this VIE. This amount excludes $18 million and $48 million of tax-exempt bonds dueunamortized premium in 2041 issued2012 and 2011, respectively. The debt is non-recourse to Dominion and is secured by the Massachusetts Development Finance Agency on behalf of Brayton Point in December 2010 are not included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets because the bonds have been purchased and are held by Dominion. The bonds will be remarketed to third parties at a later date.Juniper’s assets.
(9)(8)Represents debt associated with Kincaid. The debt is non-recourse to Dominion and is secured by the facility’s assets ($507552 million at December 31, 2010)2012) and revenue. Dominion announced in the third quarter of 2012 that it was pursuing the sale of Kincaid. Dominion anticipates redeeming the notes as a condition to a sale of Kincaid.
(9)Includes debt issued by the Massachusetts Development Finance Agency on behalf of Brayton Point. Dominion announced in the third quarter of 2012 that it was pursuing the sale of Brayton Point.
(10)Represents the valuation of certain fair value hedges associated with Dominion’s fixed-ratefixed rate debt.
(11)Includes $2$23 million of net unamortized discountpremium and fair value hedge valuation in 2009.2012 and $4 million of net unamortized discount in 2011.

 

100   101

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

Based on stated maturity dates rather than early redemption dates that could be elected by instrument holders, the scheduled principal payments of long-term debt at December 31, 2010,2012, were as follows:

 

  2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Thereafter Total   2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total 
(millions, except percentages)                                

Virginia Power

  $15   $616   $418   $17   $219   $5,436   $6,721    $418   $17   $211   $476   $679   $4,875   $6,676  

Weighted-average Coupon

   7.74  5.17  4.88  7.73  5.43  5.69    4.88  7.73  5.39  5.27  5.44  5.26 

Dominion

                

Secured Senior Notes

  $13   $13   $11   $15   $18   $101   $171    $852   $15   $18   $20   $22   $60   $987  

Unsecured Senior Notes

   484    1,470    690    665    960    9,101    13,370     1,090    1,065    960    1,351    1,303    9,278    15,047  

Tax-Exempt Financings

                   8    943    951                 19    75    1,227    1,321  

Unsecured Junior Subordinated Notes Payable to Affiliated Trusts

                       268    268     258                    10    268  

Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes

                       1,469    1,469                         1,365    1,365  

Total

  $497   $1,483   $701   $680   $986   $11,882   $16,229    $2,200   $1,080   $978   $1,390   $1,400   $11,940   $18,988  

Weighted-average Coupon

   6.35  5.62  5.01  5.27  4.52  6.15    4.53  3.99  4.50  4.27  4.60  5.54 

Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s short-term credit facilities and long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants and default provisions. As of December 31, 2010,2012, there were no events of default under these covenants.

 

In January 2013, Virginia Power issued $250 million of 1.2% and $500 million of 4.0% senior notes that mature in 2018 and 2043, respectively.

Convertible Securities

At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had $202$82 million of outstanding contingent convertible senior notes that are convertible by holders into a combination of cash and shares of Dominion’s common stock under certain circumstances. The conversion feature requires that the principal amount of each note be repaid in cash, while amounts payable in excess of the principal amount will be paid in common stock. At issuance, the notes were valued at a conversion rate of 27.173 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of senior notes, which represented a conversion price of $36.80. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment without limitation upon certain events such as subdivisions, splits, combinations of common stock or the issuance to all common stock holders of certain common stock rights, warrants or options and certain dividend increases. As of December 31, 2010,2012, the conversion rate had been adjusted to 28.503229.3863 shares, primarily due to individual dividend payments above the level paid at issuance. If the outstanding notes as of December 31, 2012 were all converted, it would result in the issuance of approximately 900 thousand additional shares. In December 2012, Dominion’s Board of Directors declared dividends payable March 20, 2013 of 56.25 cents per share of common stock which will increase the conversion rate to 29.5147 effective as of February 26, 2013.

The number of shares included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation is calculated as the net shares issuable for the reporting period based upon the average market price for the period. This results in an increase in the average shares outstanding used in the calculation of Dominion’s diluted EPS when the conversion price is lower than the average market price of Dominion’s common stock over the period, and results in no adjustment when the conversion price exceeds the average market price.

The senior notes are convertible by holders into a combination of cash and shares of Dominion’s common stock under any of the following circumstances:

(1)The closing price of Dominion’s common stock equals 120% of the applicable conversion price ($40.66 as of February 26,
2013) or higher for at least 20 out of the last 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous calendar quarter;
(2)The senior notes are called for redemption by Dominion;
(3)The occurrence of specified corporate transactions; or
(4)The credit rating assigned to the senior notes by Moody’s is below Baa3 and by Standard & Poor’s is below BBB- or the ratings are discontinued for any reason.

During the first three quarters of 2010, theThe senior notes were not eligible for conversion. However, as of September 30, 2010,conversion during 2012 since the closing price of Dominion’s common stock was equal to $42.24 per share120% of the applicable conversion price or higher for at least 20 out of the last 30 consecutive trading days; therefore, the senior notes were eligible for conversion during the fourth quarterdays of 2010.each quarter. During 2010, less than $12012, approximately $61 million of the contingent convertible senior notes were converted by holders. The senior notes were not eligible for conversion during 2009. As of December 31, 2010,2012, the closing price of Dominion’s common stock was not equal to $42.10$40.84 per share or higher for at least 20 out of the last 30 consecutive trading days; therefore, the senior notes are not eligible for conversion during the first quarter of 2011.2013. Beginning in 2007, the notes have been eligible for contingent interest if the average trading price as defined in the indenture equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the senior notes. Holders have the right to require Dominion to purchase these senior notes for cash at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest in December 2011, 2013 or 2018, or if Dominion undergoes certain fundamental changes. The senior notes have been callable by Dominion since December 15, 2011.

Junior Subordinated Notes Payable to Affiliated Trusts

In previous years, Dominion and Virginia Power established several subsidiary capital trusts, each as a finance subsidiary of the respective parent company,Dominion, which holdholds 100% of the voting interests. The trusts sold trust preferredcapital securities representing preferred beneficial interests and 97% beneficial ownership in the assets held by the trusts. In exchange for the funds realized from the sale of the trust preferredcapital securities and common securities that represent the remaining 3% beneficial ownership interest in the assets held by the capital trusts, Dominion and Virginia Power issued various junior subordinated notes. The junior subordinated notes constitute 100% of each capital trust’s assets. Each trust must redeem its trust preferredcapital securities when their respective junior subordinated notes are repaid at maturity or if redeemed prior to maturity.

In May 2008, Virginia Power repaid its $412 million 7.375% unsecured junior subordinated notes and redeemed all 16 million units of the $400 million 7.375% Virginia Power Capital Trust II

 

 

102   101

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

preferredIn November 2012, Dominion provided notice of redemption for its $258 million 7.83% unsecured junior subordinated debentures and all 250 thousand units of the $250 million 7.83% Dominion Resources Capital Trust I capital securities due July 30, 2042. TheseDecember 1, 2027. At December 31, 2012, the debentures were included in securities weredue within one year in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In January 2013, Dominion redeemed the securities at a price of $25$1,019.58 per preferredcapital security plus accrued and unpaid distributions.

The following table provides summary information about the trust preferredcapital securities and junior subordinated notes outstanding as of December 31, 2010:2012:

 

Date

Established

 Capital Trusts Units Rate Trust
Preferred
Securities
Amount
 Common
Securities
Amount
  Capital Trusts Units Rate Capital
Securities
Amount
 Common
Securities
Amount
 
 (thousands)   (millions)  (thousands)   (millions) 

December 1997

 Dominion Resources Capital Trust I(1)  250    7.83 $250   $7.7   Dominion Resources Capital Trust I(1)  250    7.83 $250   $7.7  

January 2001

 

Dominion Resources

Capital Trust III(2)

  10    8.4  10    0.3   Dominion Resources Capital Trust III(2)  10    8.4    10    0.3  

Junior subordinated notes/debentures held as assets by each capital trust were as follows:

(1)$258 million—Dominion Resources, Inc. 7.83% Debentures due 12/1/2027.
(2)$10 million—Dominion Resources, Inc. 8.4% Debentures due 1/15/2031.

The following table presents interestInterest charges related to the Companies’Dominion’s junior subordinated notes payable to affiliated trusts:trusts were $21 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

    2010   2009   2008 
(millions)            

Dominion

  $21    $21    $33  

Virginia Power

            $12  

Distribution payments on the trust preferredcapital securities are considered to be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the respective parent company that issued the debt instruments held by each trust when all of the related agreements are taken into consideration.Dominion. Each guarantee agreement only provides for the guarantee of distribution payments on the relevant trust preferredcapital securities to the extent that the trust has funds legally and immediately available to make distributions. The trust’s ability to pay amounts when they are due on the trust preferredcapital securities is dependent solely upon the payment of amounts by Dominion when they are due on the junior subordinated notes. Dominion may defer interest payments on the junior subordinated notes on one or more occasions for up to five consecutive years and the related trusts must also defer distributions. If the payment on the junior subordinated notes is deferred, Dominion may not make distributions related to its capital stock, including dividends, redemptions, repurchases, liquidation payments or guarantee payments.payments, during the deferral period. Also, during any deferral period, Dominion may not make any payments on, redeem or repurchase any debt securities that are equal in right of payment with, or subordinated to, the junior subordinated notes.

Enhanced Junior Subordinated Notes

In June 2006 and September 2006, Dominion issued $300 million of June 2006 hybrids and $500 million of September 2006 hybrids, respectively. The June 2006 hybrids will bear interest at 7.5% per year until June 30, 2016. Thereafter, they will bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.825%, reset quarterly. TheBeginning September 30, 2011, the September 2006 hybrids will bear interest at 6.3% per year until September 30, 2011. Thereafter, they will bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.3%, reset quarterly. Previously, interest was fixed at 6.3% per year.

In June 2009, Dominion issued $685 million (including $60 million related to the underwriter’s option to purchase additional

notes to cover over-allotments) of 8.375% June 2009 hybrids. The June 2009 hybrids are listed on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE under the symbol DRU.

In April 2010, Dominion purchased and cancelled $16 million of the September 2006 hybrids. These purchases were conducted in compliance with the RCCs.

Dominion may defer interest payments on the hybrids on one or more occasions for up to 10 consecutive years. If the interest payments on the hybrids are deferred, Dominion may not make distributions related to its capital stock, including dividends, redemptions, repurchases, liquidation payments or guarantee payments.payments during the deferral period. Also, during the deferral period, Dominion may not make any payments on or redeem or repurchase any debt securities that are equal in right of payment with, or subordinated to, the hybrids.

Dominion executed RCCs in connection with its issuance of all of the hybrids described above. Under the terms of the RCCs, Dominion covenants to and for the benefit of designated covered debtholders, as may be designated from time to time, that Dominion shall not redeem, repurchase, or defease all or any part of the hybrids, and shall not cause its majority owned subsidiaries to purchase all or any part of the hybrids, on or before their applicable RCC termination date, unless, subject to certain limitations, during the 180 days prior to such activity, Dominion has received a specified amount of proceeds as set forth in the RCCs from the sale of qualifying securities that have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more equity-like than the applicable characteristics of the hybrids at that time, as more fully described in the RCCs. In September 2011, Dominion amended the RCCs of the June 2006 hybrids and September 2006 hybrids to expand the measurement period for consideration of proceeds from the sale of common stock issuances from 180 days to 365 days. The proceeds Dominion receives from the replacement offering, adjusted by a predetermined factor, must equal or exceed the redemption or repurchase price.

In both December 2011 and April 2010, Dominion purchased and canceled approximately $16 million of the September 2006 hybrids. In February 2012, Dominion launched a tender offer to purchase up to $150 million of additional September 2006 hybrids. In the first quarter of 2012, Dominion purchased and canceled approximately $86 million of the September 2006 hybrids primarily as a result of this tender offer, which expired in March 2012. In the second quarter of 2012, Dominion purchased and canceled approximately $2 million of the September 2006 hybrids. All purchases were conducted in compliance with the RCC.

From time to time, Dominion may reduce its outstanding debt and level of interest expense through redemption of debt securities prior to maturity and repurchases in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, through additional tender offers or otherwise.

 

 

NOTE 19.18. PREFERRED STOCK

Dominion is authorized to issue up to 20 million shares of preferred stock; however, none were issued and outstanding at December 31, 20102012 or 2009.2011.

Virginia Power is authorized to issue up to 10 million shares of preferred stock, $100 liquidation preference, and had 2.59 million preferred shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 20102012 and 2009.2011. Upon involuntary liquidation,

103


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

dissolution or winding-up of Virginia Power, each share would be entitled to receive $100 plus accrued cumulative dividends.

Holders of Virginia Power’s outstanding preferred stock are not entitled to voting rights except under certain provisions of the amended and restated articles of incorporation and related provisions of Virginia law restricting corporate action, upon default in dividends or in special statutory proceedings and as required by Virginia law (such as mergers, consolidations, sales of assets, dissolution and changes in voting rights or priorities of preferred stock).

Presented below are the series of Virginia Power preferred stock that were outstanding as of December 31, 2010:2012:

 

Dividend  Issued and
Outstanding
Shares
   Entitled Per Share
Upon Liquidation
   Issued and
Outstanding
Shares
   Entitled Per Share
Upon Liquidation
 
  (thousands)       (thousands)     

$5.00

   107    $112.50     107    $112.50  

4.04

   13     102.27     13     102.27  

4.20

   15     102.50     15     102.50  

4.12

   32     103.73     32     103.73  

4.80

   73     101.00     73     101.00  

7.05

   500     101.06(1)    500     100.36(1) 

6.98

   600     101.05(2)    600     100.35(2) 

Flex Money Market Preferred 12/02, Series A

   1,250     100.00(3)    1,250     100.00(3) 

Total

   2,590        2,590     

 

(1)Through 7/31/2011; $100.712013; $100.00 commencing 8/1/2011; amounts decline in steps thereafter to $100.00 by 8/1/2013.
(2)Through 8/31/2011; $100.702013; $100.00 commencing 9/1/2011; amounts decline in steps thereafter to $100.00 by 9/1/2013.
(3)Dividend rate iswas 6.25% throughuntil 3/20/20112011. Effective 3/20/11 the rate reset to 6.12% until 3/20/2014 after which the rate will be determined according to periodic auctions for periods established by Virginia Power at the time of the auction process.

 

102


 

NOTE 20.19. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Issuance of Common Stock

DOMINION

Dominion maintains Dominion Direct® and a number of employee savings plans through which contributions may be invested in Dominion’s common stock. These shares may either be newly issued or purchased on the open market with proceeds contributed to these plans. In January 2012, Dominion began issuing new common shares for these direct stock purchase plans.

During 2010,2012, Dominion issued 2.3approximately 6.4 million shares of common stock forthrough various programs. Dominion received cash proceeds of $74 million. The$265 million from the issuance of 5.3 million of such shares issued and cash proceeds received during 2010 were through Dominion Direct,®, employee savings plans, and the exercise of employee stock options.

In February 2010,January 2012, Dominion began purchasing itsfiled a new SEC shelf registration for the sale of debt and equity securities including the ability to sell common stock onthrough an at the open market program. Dominion entered into four separate Sales Agency Agreements to effect sales under the program. However, with proceeds receivedthe exception of issuing approximately $318 million in equity through Dominion Direct® and employee savings plans, rather than having additional newdirect stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plans, converted securities and other employee and director benefit plans, Dominion did not issue common shares issued.stock in 2012.

VIRGINIA POWER

In 2012 and 2011, Virginia Power did not issue any shares of its common stock to Dominion. In 2010, Virginia Power issued 33,013 shares of its common stock to Dominion for approximately $1 billion. The proceeds were used to pay downbillion, for the purpose of retiring short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion.

Shares Reserved for Issuance

At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had approximately 5248 million shares reserved and available for issuance for Dominion Direct®, employee stock awards, employee savings plans, director stock compensation plans and contingent convertible senior notes.

Repurchase of Common Stock

In March 2010, Dominion began repurchasing common shares in anticipation of proceeds from the sale of its Appalachian E&P operations. During 2010,2011, Dominion repurchased 21.4approximately 13 million shares of its common stock for approximately $900 million.

On January 28, 2011, Dominion announced that it intends to repurchase between $400$601 million and $700 million of common stock with cash tax savings resulting from the extension of the bonus depreciation allowance discussed in Note 6. In the first quarter of 2011, Dominion began repurchasing shares on the open market, under this program.at an average price of $46.37 per share. Dominion did not repurchase any shares in 2012 and does not plan to repurchase shares during 2013, except for shares tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock, which do not count against its stock repurchase authorization.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Presented in the table below is a summary of AOCI by component:

 

At December 31,  2010  2009 
(millions)       

Dominion

   

Net unrealized gains on derivatives-hedging activities, net of tax of $(27) and $(170)

  $51   $281  

Net unrealized gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of tax of $(142) and $(97)

   226    151  

Net unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs, net of tax of $446 and $444

   (607  (643

Total AOCI

  $(330 $(211

Virginia Power

   

Net unrealized gains on derivatives-hedging activities, net of tax of $(2) and $(8)

  $4   $13  

Net unrealized gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of tax of $(13) and $(9)

   20    13  

Total AOCI

  $24   $26  
At December 31,  2012  2011 
(millions)       

Dominion

   

Net unrealized losses on derivatives-hedging activities, net of tax of $87 and $48

  $(122 $(54

Net unrealized gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of tax of $(206) and $(154)

   326    243  

Net unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs, net of tax of $745 and $568

   (1,081  (799

Total AOCI

  $(877 $(610

Virginia Power

   

Net unrealized losses on derivatives-hedging activities, net of tax of $3 and $2

  $(6 $(3

Net unrealized gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, net of tax of $(19) and $(14)

   31    22  

Total AOCI

  $25   $19  

Stock-Based Awards

The 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan permits stock-based awards that include restricted stock, performance grants, goal-based stock, stock options, and stock appreciation rights. The Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan permits grants of restricted stock and stock options. Under provisions of both plans, employees and non-employee directors may be granted options to purchase common stock at a price not less than its fair market value at the date of grant with a maximum term of eight years. Option terms are set at the discretion of the CGN Committee of the Board of Directors or the Board of Directors itself, as provided under each plan. At December 31, 2010,2012, approximately 3332 million shares were available for future grants under these plans.

Dominion measures and recognizes compensation expense relating to share-based payment transactions over the vesting

104


period based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Dominion’s results for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 2009 and 2008 include $40$25 million, $44$39 million, and $46$40 million, respectively, of compensation costs and $15$8 million, $17$13 million, and $17$15 million, respectively of income tax benefits related to Dominion’s stock-based compensation arrangements. Stock-based compensation cost is reported in other operations and maintenance expense in Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Benefits ofExcess tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock-based compensation (excess tax benefits)benefits are classified as a financing cash flow. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, Dominion realized $10 million, $5$2 million, and $7$10 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits from the vesting of restricted stock awards and exercise of stock options.

STOCK OPTIONS

The following table provides a summary of changes in amounts of stock options outstanding as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008.2010. No options were granted under any plan in 2010, 20092012, 2011 or 2008.2010.

 

  Shares Weighted -
average
Exercise Price
   Weighted -
average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
   Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value(1)
  Shares Weighted -
average
Exercise Price
 Weighted -
average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value(1)
 
  (thousands)     (years)   (millions)  (thousands)   (years) (millions) 

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007

   7,021   $30.46        

Exercised

   (1,458 $30.20      $17  

Forfeited/expired

   (5 $28.85        

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008

   5,558   $30.53       $30  

Exercised

   (1,706 $28.93      $10  

Forfeited/expired

   (30 $28.89        

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009

   3,822   $31.25       $29    3,822   $31.25    29  

Exercised

   (1,983 $30.81      $22    (1,983 $30.81    $22  

Forfeited/expired

   (29 $29.84          (29 $29.84   

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010

   1,810   $31.76     1.1    $20    1,810   $31.76   $20  

Exercised

  (1,174 $32.46    $17  

Forfeited/expired

  (8 $31.57   

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011

  628   $30.81   $14  

Exercised

  (622 $30.79    $13  

Forfeited/expired

  (6 $32.26   

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2012

     $       $  

 

(1)Intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price of the option and the market value of Dominion’s stock.

103


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

Dominion issues new shares to satisfy stock option exercises. Dominion received cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options of approximately $63$19 million, $49$38 million, and $43$63 million in the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

RESTRICTED STOCK

Restricted stock grants are made to officers under Dominion’s LTIP and may also be granted to certain key contributors from time to time. The fair value of Dominion’s restricted stock awards is equal to the market price of Dominion’s stock on the date of grant. New shares are issued for restricted stock awards on the date of grant and generally vest over a three-year service period. The following table provides a summary of restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008:2010:

 

  Shares Weighted
- average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Shares Weighted
- average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
  (thousands)    (thousands)   

Nonvested at December 31, 2007

   2,014   $35.31  

Granted

   546    40.99  

Vested

   (935  32.09  

Cancelled and forfeited

   (69  39.51  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   200    34.77  

Nonvested at December 31, 2008

   1,756   $38.55  

Granted

   533    33.84  

Vested

   (913  34.81  

Cancelled and forfeited

   (77  38.32  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   185    44.18  

Nonvested at December 31, 2009

   1,484   $39.88    1,484   $39.88  

Granted

   463    38.80    463    38.80  

Vested

   (618  43.54    (618  43.54  

Cancelled and forfeited

   (39  36.92    (39  36.92  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   186    40.84    186    40.84  

Nonvested at December 31, 2010

   1,476   $38.20    1,476   $38.20  

Granted

  299    43.68  

Vested

  (617  40.72  

Cancelled and forfeited

  (25  36.29  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

  168    30.99  

Nonvested at December 31, 2011

  1,301   $37.37  

Granted

  390    51.14  

Vested

  (596  33.31  

Cancelled and forfeited

  (10  42.99  

Nonvested at December 31, 2012

  1,085   $44.46  

As of December 31, 2010,2012, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards totaled $21$23 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.62.1 years. The fair value of restricted stock awards that vested was $30 million, $28 million, and $26 million $29 million,in 2012, 2011 and $40 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Employees may elect to have shares of restricted stock withheld upon vesting to satisfy tax withholding obligations. The number of shares withheld will vary for each employee depending on the vesting date fair market value of Dominion stock and the applicable federal, state and local tax withholding rates.

GOAL-BASED STOCK

Goal-based stock awards have beenare granted under Dominion’s LTIP to key contributors who are non-officer employees and to certain officers who have not achieved a certain targeted level of share ownership, in lieu of cash-based performance grants. Goal-based stock awards may also be made to certain key non-officer employees from time to time. Current outstanding goal-based shares include awards granted to officers in February 2009, April 20092011 and February 2010.2012.

The issuance of awards is based on the achievement of multipletwo performance metrics during a two-year period, including ROIC, BVP (for awards made in 2008 and 2009) and TSR relative to that of a peer group of companies.companies and ROIC for 2011 and, for 2012, the two metrics of TSR relative to that of companies listed as members of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index as of the end of the performance period and ROIC. The actual number of

shares issued will vary between zero and 200% of targeted shares depending on the level of performance metrics achieved. The fair value of goal-based stock is equal to the market price of Dominion’s stock on the date of grant. Goal-based stock awards granted to key non-officer employees convert to restricted stock at the end

105


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

of the two-year performance period and generally vest three years from the original grant date. Awards to officers vest at the end of the two-year performance period. All goal-based stock awards are settled by issuing new shares.

After the performance period for the April 20072009 grants ended on December 31, 2008,2010, the CGN Committee determined the actual performance against metrics established for those awards. For awards to key non-officer employees, 127132 thousand shares of the outstanding goal-based stock awards granted in April 20072009 were converted to 185168 thousand shares of restricted stock for the remaining term of the vesting period ending in April 2010.2012. For awards to officers, 2720 thousand shares of the outstanding goal-based stock awards were converted to 3825 thousand non-restricted shares and issued to the officers.

After the performance period for the April 20082010 grants ended on December 31, 2009,2011, the CGN Committee determined the actual performance against metrics established for those awards. For awards to key non-officer employees, 147 thousand shares of the outstanding goal-based stock awards granted in April 2008 were converted to 186 thousand shares of restricted stock for the remaining term of the vesting period ending in April 2011. For awards to officers, 129 thousand shares of the outstanding goal-based stock awards were converted to 15 thousand non-restricted shares and issued to the officers.

The following table provides a summary of goal-based stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008:2010:

 

  Targeted
Number of
Shares
 Weighted
- average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
   Targeted
Number of
Shares
 

Weighted

- average
Grant Date
Fair Value

 
  (thousands)     (thousands)   

Nonvested at December 31, 2007

   289   $39.16  

Granted

   164    40.97  

Vested

   (1  43.78  

Cancelled and forfeited

   (7  43.33  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   (130  34.77  

Nonvested at December 31, 2008

   315   $42.56  

Granted

   165    31.43  

Vested

   (28  44.38  

Cancelled and forfeited

   (2  37.24  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   (127  44.18  

Nonvested at December 31, 2009

   323   $36.12     323   $36.12  

Granted

   9    37.46     9    37.46  

Vested

   (16  39.31     (16  39.31  

Cancelled and forfeited

   (8  30.99     (8  30.99  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   (147  40.84     (147  40.84  

Nonvested at December 31, 2010

   161   $31.79     161   $31.79  

Granted

   3    43.54  

Vested

   (20  34.62  

Converted from goal-based stock to restricted stock

   (132  30.99  

Nonvested at December 31, 2011

   12   $39.19  

Granted

   1    52.48  

Vested

   (9  37.46  

Nonvested at December 31, 2012

   4   $45.60  

At December 31, 2010,2012, the targeted number of shares expected to be issued under the February 2009, April 2009,2011 and February 20102012 awards was approximately 1614 thousand. In January 2011,2013, the CGN Committee determined the actual performance against metrics established for the February 2009 and April

104


20092011 awards with a performance period that ended December 31, 2010.2012. Based on that determination, the total number of shares to be issued under the February 2011 goal-based stock awards was approximately 2022 thousand.

As of December 31, 2010,2012, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested goal-based stock awards totaled $2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.was not material.

CASH-BASED PERFORMANCE GRANTRANTS

Cash-based performance grants are made to Dominion’s officers under Dominion’s LTIP. The actual payout of cash-based performance grants will vary between zero and 200% of the targeted amount based on the level of performance metrics achieved.

The targeted amount of the cash-based performance grant

made to officers in April 20072009 was $11 million, but the actual payout of the award in February 20092011 determined by the CGN Committee was $16$14 million ($11 million of which was paid in December 2010), based on the level of performance metrics achieved.

The targeted amount of the cash-based performance grant made to officers in April 2008 was $12 million, but the actual payout of the award inIn February 2010, determined by the CGN Committee was $15 million, based on the level of performance metrics achieved. At December 31, 2009, a liability of $15 million had been accrued for this award.

In February 2009, a cash-based performance grant was made to officers. A portion of the grant, representing the $11$14 million targeted amount as of December 31, 2010, was paid in December 2010, based on the achievement of three performance metrics during 2009 and 2010: ROIC, BVP and TSR relative to that of a peer group of companies. The total expected award under the grant is $14 million and the remaining portion of the grant will be paid by March 15, 2011. At December 31, 2010, a liability of $3 million had been accrued for the remaining portion of the award.

In February 2010, a cash-based performance grant was made to officers. Payout of the performance grant will occur by March 15, 20122011, based on the achievement of two performance metrics during 2010 and 2011: ROIC and TSR relative to that of a peer group of companies. The total amount of the award under the grant was $20 million and the remaining $6 million of the grant was paid in February 2012. At December 31, 2010,2011, a liability of $5 million had been accrued for the remaining portion of the award.

In February 2011, a cash-based performance grant was made to officers. A portion of the grant, representing the initial payout of $6 million was paid in December 2012, based on the achievement of two performance metrics during 2011 and 2012: TSR relative to that of a peer group of companies and ROIC. The total expected award under the grant is $8 million and the remaining portion of the grant is expected to be paid by March 15, 2013. At December 31, 2012, a liability of $2 million had been accrued for the remaining portion of the award.

In February 2012, a cash-based performance grant was made to officers. Payout of the performance grant is expected to occur by March 15, 2014 based on the achievement of two performance metrics during 2012 and 2013: TSR relative to that of companies listed as members of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index as of the end of the performance period and ROIC. At December 31, 2012, the targeted amount of the grant was $12 million and a liability of $6 million had been accrued for this award.

 

 

NOTE 21.20. DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS

The Virginia Commission may prohibit any public service company, including Virginia Power, from declaring or paying a dividend to an affiliate if found to be detrimental to the public interest. At December 31, 2010,2012, the Virginia Commission had not restricted the payment of dividends by Virginia Power.

Certain agreements associated with Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s credit facilities contain restrictions on the ratio of debt to total capitalization. These limitations did not restrict Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s ability to pay dividends or receive dividends from their subsidiaries at December 31, 2010.2012.

See Note 1817 for a description of potential restrictions on dividend payments by Dominion in connection with the deferral of interest payments on junior subordinated notes.

 

NOTE 22.21. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

DOMINION

Dominion provides certain retirement benefits to eligible active employees, retirees and qualifying dependents. Under the terms of its benefit plans, Dominion reserves the right to change, modify or terminate the plans. From time to time in the past, benefits have changed, and some of these changes have reduced benefits.

Dominion maintains qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering virtually all employees. Retirement benefits are based primarily on years of service, age and the

106


employee’s compensation. Dominion’s funding policy is to contribute annually an amount that is in accordance with the provisions of ERISA. The pension program also provides benefits to certain retired executives under a company-sponsored nonqualified employee benefit plan. The nonqualified plan is funded through contributions to a grantor trust.

Dominion also provides retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits with annual employee premiums based on several factors such as age, retirement date and years of service. In January 2011, Dominion amended its retiree healthcare and life benefits to change the eligibility age for the majority of nonunion employees from 55 with 10 years of service to 58 with 10 years of service, resulting in an approximately $71 million reduction to the other postretirement benefit plan obligation. The eligibility requirements for nonunion employees hired on or after January 1, 2008, who benefit under the Retiree Medical Account design, as well as for union employees are not affected by this plan design change.

Pension and other postretirement benefit costs are affected by employee demographics (including age, compensation levels and years of service), the level of contributions made to the plans and earnings on plan assets. These costs may also be affected by changes in key assumptions, including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates and the rate of compensation increases.

Dominion uses December 31 as the measurement date for all of its employee benefit plans. Dominion uses the market-related value of pension plan assets to determine the expected return on plan assets, a component of net periodic pension cost. The market-related value recognizes changes in fair value on a straight-line basis over a four-year period, which reduces year-to-year volatility. Changes in fair value are measured as the difference between the expected and actual plan asset returns, including dividends, interest and realized and unrealized investment gains and losses. Since the market-related value recognizes changes in fair value over a four-year period, the future market-related value of pension plan assets will be impacted as previously unrecognized changes in fair value are recognized.

Dominion’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans hold investments in trusts to fund employee benefit payments. Aggregate actual returns for Dominion’s pension and other postretirement plan assets were $624$743 million in 20102012 and $777$273 million in 2009,2011, versus expected returns of $479$509 million and $462$519 million, respectively. Differences between actual and expected returns on plan assets are accumulated and amortized during future periods. As such, any investment-related declines in these trusts will result in future increases in the periodic cost recognized for such employee benefit plans and will be included in the determination of the amount of cash to be contributed to the employee benefit plans.

105


Combined NotesIn January 2011, Dominion amended its retiree healthcare and life benefits to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continuedchange the eligibility age, effective January 1, 2012, for the majority of nonunion employees from 55 with 10 years of service to 58 with 10 years of service, resulting in an approximately $71 million reduction to the other postretirement benefit plan obligation. The eligibility requirements for nonunion employees hired on or after January 1, 2008, who benefit under the Retiree Medical Account design, as well as for union employees were not affected by this plan design change.

The Medicare Act introduced a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree healthcare benefit plans that provide a prescription drug benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. Dominion determined that the prescription drug benefit offered under its other postretirement benefit plans is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In 2010 and 2009, Dominion received a federal subsidy of $5 million for each of 2012 and $4 million, respectively, and expects2011. In December 2011, Dominion elected to continue to receivechange its method of receiving the subsidy offered under Medicare Part D for retiree prescription drug coverage

from the Retiree Drug Subsidy to the EGWP. This change became effective January 1, 2013. As a result of this change, Dominion recognized a decrease in its other postretirement benefit obligations of approximately $170 million as of December 31, 2011. As a result of the adoption of the EGWP, beginning in 2013 Dominion will receive an increased level of Medicare Act.Part D subsidies, in the form of reduced costs rather than a direct reimbursement.

Funded Status

The following table summarizes the changes in Dominion’s pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan obligations and plan assets and includes a statement of the plans’ funded status:

 

  Pension Benefits Other Postretirement
Benefits
   Pension Benefits 

Other Postretirement

Benefits

 
Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2010 2009   2012 2011 2012 2011 
(millions, except percentages)               

Changes in benefit obligation:

          

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $4,126   $3,893   $1,555   $1,554    $4,981   $4,490   $1,493   $1,707  

Service cost

   102    106    56    60     116    108    44    48  

Interest cost

   266    250    101    100     268    258    79    94  

Benefits paid

   (211  (179  (82  (77   (208  (215  (88  (83

Actuarial (gains) losses during the year

   210    54    36    (85   967    340    191    (210

Transfer(1)

   (48            

Plan amendments

   1    1        (1   1        1    (70

Settlements and curtailments(2)

   34    1    35      

Special termination benefits(3)

   10        1      

Settlements and curtailments

           (6  (1

Medicare Part D reimbursement

           5    4             5    5  

Early Retirement Reimbursement Program

               3  

Benefit obligation at end of year

  $4,490   $4,126   $1,707   $1,555    $6,125   $4,981   $1,719   $1,493  

Changes in fair value of plan assets:

          

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $4,226   $3,757   $918   $747    $5,145   $5,106   $1,042   $1,031  

Actual return on plan assets

   532    633    92    144     611    247    132    26  

Employer contributions

   665    15    56    64     5    7    16    19  

Benefits paid

   (211  (179  (35  (37   (208  (215  (34  (34

Transfer(1)

   (106            

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $5,106   $4,226   $1,031   $918    $5,553   $5,145   $1,156   $1,042  

Funded status at end of year

  $616   $100   $(676 $(637  $(572 $164   $(563 $(451

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31:

          

Assets held for sale(4)

  $   $47   $   $  

Noncurrent pension and other postretirement benefit assets

   710    695    2    7     701    677    1    4  

Liabilities held for sale(4)

               (11

Other current liabilities

   (4  (13  (3  (2   (2  (3  (4  (3

Noncurrent pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities

   (90  (629  (675  (631   (1,271  (510  (560  (452

Net amount recognized

  $616   $100   $(676 $(637  $(572 $164   $(563 $(451

Significant assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of December 31:

          

Discount rate

   5.90  6.60  5.90  6.60   4.4  5.5  4.4  5.5

Weighted average rate of increase for compensation

   4.61  4.76  4.62  4.79   4.21  4.21  4.22  4.22

 

(1)Represents transfer of pension plan assets and obligation for all active Peoples employees as of February 1, 2010. See Note 4 for more information on the sale of Peoples completed in February 2010.

107


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

(2)Relates to the sales of Peoples and Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations and a workforce reduction program.
(3)Represents a one-time special termination benefit for certain employees in connection with a workforce reduction program.
(4)Represents pension plan assets classified as assets held for sale and other postretirement benefit plan obligations classified as liabilities held for sale for Peoples in Dominion’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The ABO for all of Dominion’s defined benefit pension plans was $4.1$5.5 billion and $3.6$4.5 billion at December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, respectively.

Under its funding policies, Dominion evaluates plan funding requirements annually, usually in the fourth quarter after receiving updated plan information from its actuary. Based on the funded status of each plan and other factors, Dominion determines the amount of contributions for the current year, if any, at that time. During 2010,2012, Dominion contributed $650 million to its qualified defined benefit pension plans. Nomade no contributions to its qualified defined benefit pension plans and no contributions are currently expected in 2011. 2013. In July 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act was signed into law. This Act includes an increase in the interest rates used to determine plan sponsors’ pension contributions for required funding purposes. These new interest rates are expected to reduce required pension contributions for 2013 through 2015. Dominion believes that required pension contributions will rise subsequent to 2015, resulting in little net impact to cumulative required contributions over a 10-year period.

Certain regulatory authorities have held that amounts recovered in utility customers’ rates for other postretirement benefits, in excess of benefits actually paid during the year, must be deposited in trust funds dedicated for the sole purpose of paying such benefits. Accordingly, certain of Dominion’s subsidiaries fund other postretirement benefit costs through VEBAs. Dominion’s remaining subsidiaries do not prefund other postretirement benefit costs but instead pay claims as presented. Dominion expects to contribute approximately $22$14 million to the Dominion VEBAs in 2011.2013.

Dominion does not expect any pension or other postretirement plan assets to be returned to the Company during 2011.2013.

The following table provides information on the benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets for plans with a benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:

 

    Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
As of December 31,  2010  2009   2010   2009 
(millions)               

Benefit obligation

  $121(1)  $3,537    $1,583    $1,430  

Fair value of plan assets

   27(1)   2,902     905     786  

(1)The decrease reflects cash contributions to the pension plans during 2010 and the merger of the Dominion Peoples Gas Union Pension Plan into the DPP at December 31, 2010.
    Pension Benefits   

Other Postretirement

Benefits

 
As of December 31,  2012   2011   2012   2011 
(millions)        

Benefit obligation

  $5,462    $4,416    $1,591    $1,375  

Fair value of plan assets

  $4,189     3,903     1,027     920  

The following table provides information on the ABO and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an ABO in excess of plan assets:

 

As of December 31,  2010 2009   2012(1)   2011 
(millions)          

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $80(1)  $3,085    $4,850      $95  

Fair value of plan assets

   —  (1)   2,902     4,189      

 

(1)The increase from 2011 is primarily due to a decrease reflects cash contributions toin the pension plans during 2010.discount rate.

106


The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

 

  Estimated Future Benefit Payments   Estimated Future Benefit Payments 
  Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement
Benefits
   Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
(millions)                

2011

  $219    $101  

2012

   226     106  

2013

   234     111    $231    $89  

2014

   246     116     245     93  

2015

   271     121     255     96  

2016-2020

   1,636     681  

2016

   300     100  

2017

   334     103  

2018-2022

   1,749     555  

The above benefit payments for other postretirement benefit plans are expected to be offset by Medicare Part D subsidies of approximately $6 million each in 2011 and 2012, $7 million each in 2013 and 2014, $8 million in 2015 and $50 million during the period 2016 through 2020.Plan Assets

Dominion’s overall objective for investing its pension and other postretirement plan assets is to achieve the best possible long-term rates of return commensurate with prudent levels of risk. To minimize risk, funds are broadly diversified among asset classes, investment strategies and investment advisors. The strategic target asset allocations for its pension funds are 28% U.S. equity, 18% non-U.S. equity, 33% fixed income, 3% real estate and 18% other alternative investments. U.S. equity includes investments in large-cap, mid-cap and small-cap companies

located in the United States. Non-U.S. equity includes investments in large-cap and small-cap companies located outside of the United States including both developed and emerging markets. Fixed income includes corporate debt instruments of companies from diversified industries and U.S. Treasuries. The U.S. equity, non-U.S. equity and fixed income investments are in individual securities as well as mutual funds. Real estate includes equity REITs and investments in partnerships. Other alternative investments include partnership investments in private equity, debt and hedge funds that follow several different strategies.

Strategic investment policies are established for each of Dominion’s prefunded benefit plans based upon periodic asset/liability studies. Factors considered in setting the investment policy include employee demographics, liability growth rates, future discount rates, the funded status of the plans and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Deviations from the plans’ strategic allocation are a function of Dominion’s assessments regarding short-term risk and reward opportunities in the capital markets and/or short-term market movements which result in the plans’ actual asset allocations varying from the strategic target asset allocations. Through periodic rebalancing, actual allocations are brought back in line with the target. Future asset/liability studies will focus on strategies to further reduce pension and other postretirement plan risk, while still achieving attractive levels of returns. Financial derivatives may be used to obtain or manage market exposures and to hedge assets and liabilities.

For fair value measurement policies and procedures related to pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets, see Note 7.6.

 

107


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The fair values of Dominion’s pension plan assets by asset category are as follows:

    Fair Value Measurements 
    Pension Plans 
At December 31,  2010   2009 
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                                

Cash equivalents

  $1    $264    $    $265    $    $233    $    $233  

U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   937     197          1,134     886     114          1,000  

Other

   436     96          532     243               243  

Non-U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   231               231     242     111          353  

Other

   119     365          484     20     36          56  

Fixed income:

                

Corporate debt instruments

   32     694          726     57     611          668  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   168     216          384     8     188          196  

State and municipal

   2     42          44     101     11          112  

Other securities

        3          3          1          1  

Real estate:

                

REITs

   51               51     33               33  

Partnerships

             271     271               344     344  

Other alternative investments:

                

Private equity

             400     400               344     344  

Debt

             262     262               241     241  

Hedge funds

             345     345               388     388  

Total(1)

  $1,977    $1,877    $1,278    $5,132    $1,590    $1,305    $1,317    $4,212  

(1)Includes net assets related to pending sales of securities of $26 million at December 31, 2010. Excludes net assets related to pending purchases of securities of $14 million at December 31, 2009.

The fair values of Dominion’s other postretirement plan assets by asset category are as follows:

    Fair Value Measurements 
    Other Postretirement Plans 
At December 31,  2010   2009 
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                                

Cash equivalents

  $    $13    $    $13    $    $13    $    $13  

U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   43     293          336     291     35          326  

Other

   20     41          61     12               12  

Non-U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   87               87     85     5          90  

Other

   5     17          22     1     2          3  

Fixed income:

                

Corporate debt instruments

   1     106          107     3     120          123  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   8     248          256          183          183  

State and municipal

        8          8     5     25          30  

Real estate:

                

REITs

   2               2     2               2  

Partnerships

             22     22               26     26  

Other alternative investments:

                

Private equity

             61     61               54     54  

Debt

             40     40               36     36  

Hedge funds

             17     17               19     19  

Total(1)

  $166    $726    $140    $1,032    $399    $383    $135    $917  

(1)Includes net assets related to pending sales of securities of $1 million at December 31, 2010. Excludes net assets related to pending purchases of securities of $1 million at December 31, 2009.

 

108    

 


 

 

The fair values of Dominion’s pension plan assets by asset category are as follows:

    Fair Value Measurements 
    Pension Plans 
At December 31,  2012   2011 
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                

Cash equivalents

  $    $195    $    $195    $1    $84    $    $85  

U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   927     104          1,031     805     123          928  

Other

   425     99          524     359     197          556  

Non-U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   313     68          381     253     58          311  

Other

   228     167          395     190     81          271  

Fixed income:

                

Corporate debt instruments

   27     1,026          1,053     36     834          870  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   331     304          635     304     392          696  

State and municipal

   1     71          72     2     77          79  

Other securities

   5     43          48     8     40          48  

Real estate:

                

REITs

   29               29     16               16  

Partnerships

             321     321               304     304  

Other alternative investments:

                

Private equity

             456     456               448     448  

Debt

             192     192               243     243  

Hedge funds

             221     221               290     290  

Total

  $2,286    $2,077    $1,190    $5,553    $1,974    $1,886    $1,285    $5,145  

The fair values of Dominion’s other postretirement plan assets by asset category are as follows:

    Fair Value Measurements 
    Other Postretirement Plans 
At December 31,  2012   2011 
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
(millions)                

Cash equivalents

  $    $13    $    $13    $    $5    $    $5  

U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   378     5          383     38     288          326  

Other

   21     45          66     17     44          61  

Non-U.S. equity:

                

Large Cap

   93     3          96     77     3          80  

Other

   11     8          19     9     4          13  

Fixed income:

                

Corporate debt instruments

   1     160          161     2     149          151  

U.S. Treasury securities and agency debentures

   16     266          282     14     246          260  

State and municipal

        9          9          6          6  

Other securities

        2          2          2          2  

Real estate:

                

REITs

   1               1     1               1  

Partnerships

             24     24               24     24  

Other alternative investments:

                

Private equity

             58     58               63     63  

Debt

             31     31               36     36  

Hedge funds

             11     11               14     14  

Total

  $521    $511    $124    $1,156    $158    $747    $137    $1,042  

109


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The following table presents the changes in Dominion’s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value and included in the Level 3 fair value category:

    Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
    Pension Plans 
    2010  2009 
    Real
Estate
  Private
Equity
   Debt  Hedge
Funds
  Total  Real
Estate
  Private
Equity
  Debt   Hedge
Funds
   Total 
(millions)                                  

Balance at January 1,

  $344   $344    $241   $388   $1,317   $438   $267   $191    $324    $1,220  

Actual return on plan assets:

              

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

   8    56     27    27    118    (91  128    19          56  

Relating to assets sold during the period

                        (1  1                

Purchases, sales and settlements

   (81       (6  (70  (157  (2  (52  31     64     41  

Balance at December 31

  $271   $400    $262   $345   $1,278   $344   $344   $241    $388    $1,317  

The following table presents the changes in Dominion’s other postretirement plan assets that are measured at fair value and included in the Level 3 fair value category:

 

    Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
    Other Postretirement Plans 
    2010  2009 
    Real
Estate
  Private
Equity
  Debt   Hedge
Funds
  Total  Real
Estate
  Private
Equity
  Debt   Hedge
Funds
   Total 
(millions)                                  

Balance at January 1,

  $26   $54   $36    $19   $135   $32   $47   $28    $15    $122  

Actual return on plan assets:

              

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

       9    2     1    12    (9  13    3          7  

Purchases, sales and settlements

   (4  (2  2     (3  (7  3    (6  5     4     6  

Balance at December 31

  $22   $61   $40    $17   $140   $26   $54   $36    $19    $135  
    Fair Value Measurements using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
    Pension Plans  Other Postretirement Plans 
    Real
Estate
  Private
Equity
  Debt  Hedge
Funds
  Total  Real
Estate
  Private
Equity
  Debt  Hedge
Funds
  Total 
Balance at December 31, 2009  $344  $344  $241  $388  $1,317  $26  $54  $36  $19  $135 

Actual return on plan assets:

           

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

   8    56    27    27    118        9    2    1    12  

Purchases

   56    90    36        182    3    9    8        20  

Sales

   (137  (90  (42  (70  (339  (7  (11  (6  (3  (27

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $271   $400   $262   $345   $1,278   $22   $61   $40   $17   $140  

Actual return on plan assets:

           

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

   38    70    10    10    128    3    11    1        15  

Relating to assets sold during the period

   (8  (34  (10  (15  (67      (4  (1  (1  (6

Purchases

   57    76    34    48    215    3    8    3    2    16  

Sales

   (54  (64  (53  (98  (269  (4  (13  (7  (4  (28

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $304   $448   $243   $290   $1,285   $24   $63   $36   $14   $137  

Actual return on plan assets:

           

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

   21    46    17    21    105    1    3    4    1    9  

Relating to assets sold during the period

   (8  (41  (11  (2  (62      (1          (1

Purchases

   35    79    15        129    2    6    1        9  

Sales

   (31  (76  (72  (88  (267  (3  (13  (10  (4  (30

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $321   $456   $192   $221   $1,190   $24   $58   $31   $11   $124  

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the provision for net periodic benefit (credit) cost and amounts recognized in other comprehensive income and regulatory assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

  Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits   Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits 
Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008   2012 2011 2010   2012   2011   2010 
(millions, except percentages)                                  

Service cost

  $102   $106   $102   $56   $60   $60    $116   $108   $102    $44    $48    $56  

Interest cost

   266    250    236    101    100    93     268    258    266     79     94     101  

Expected return on plan assets

   (410  (405  (411  (69  (57  (73   (430  (440  (410   (79   (79   (69

Amortization of prior service (credit) cost

   3    4    4    (7  (7  (6   3    3    3     (13   (13   (7

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   59    38    7    12    30    8     132    96    59     6     12     12  

Settlements and curtailments(1)

   136    3        37                     136     (4   1     37  

Special termination benefits(2)

   10            1                     10               1  

Plan amendments

       1                1  

Net periodic benefit (credit) cost

  $166   $(3 $(62 $131   $126   $83  

Net periodic benefit cost

  $89   $25   $166    $33    $63    $131  

Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income and regulatory assets and liabilities:

                 

Current year net actuarial (gain) loss

  $95   $(174 $1,643   $13   $(172 $306    $786   $534   $95    $139    $(157  $13  

Prior service (credit) cost

   1        4        (1  (7           1     1     (70     

Settlements and curtailments(1)

   (50  (2      (1      (11           (50   (2   (1   (1

Less amounts included in net periodic benefit (credit) cost:

       

Less amounts included in net periodic benefit cost:

          

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   (59  (38  (7  (12  (30  (8   (132  (96  (59   (6   (12   (12

Amortization of prior service credit (cost)

   (3  (4  (4  7    7    6     (3  (3  (3   13     13     7  

Total recognized in other comprehensive income and regulatory assets and liabilities

  $(16 $(218 $1,636   $7   $(196 $286    $651   $435   $(16  $145    $(227  $7  

Significant assumptions used to determine periodic cost:

                 

Discount rate

   6.60  6.60  6.60  6.60  6.60  6.50   5.5  5.9  6.6   5.5   5.9   6.6

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   8.50  8.50  8.50  7.75  7.75  7.75   8.5  8.5  8.5   7.75   7.75   7.75

Weighted average rate of increase for compensation

   4.76  4.79  4.79  4.79  4.78  4.70   4.21  4.61  4.76   4.22   4.62   4.79

Healthcare cost trend rate

      7.00  8.00  9.00

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)

      4.60  4.90  4.90

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

    2060    2060    2059  

Healthcare cost trend rate(3)

       7   7   7

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)(3)

       4.6   4.6   4.6

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate(3)

      2061     2060     2060  

 

(1)Relates2012 amounts relate to the sale of Salem Harbor. 2010 amounts relate to the sales of Peoples and Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations and a workforce reduction program.
(2)Represents a one-time special termination benefit for certain employees in connection with a workforce reduction program.
(3)Assumptions used to determine periodic cost for the following year.

 

110   109

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

The components of AOCI and regulatory assets and liabilities that have not been recognized as components of periodic benefit (credit) cost are as follows:

 

    Pension Benefits   Other
Postretirement
Benefits
 
At December 31,  2010   2009   2010  2009 
(millions)               

Net actuarial loss

  $1,773    $1,788    $268   $271  

Prior service (credit) cost

   17     19     (28  (36

Total(1)

  $1,790    $1,807    $240   $235  

    Pension Benefits   

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

 
At December 31,  2012   2011   2012  2011 
(millions)               

Net actuarial loss

  $2,865    $2,211    $229   $100  

Prior service (credit) cost

   11     14     (71  (86

Total(1)

  $2,876    $2,225    $158   $14  
(1)As of December 31, 2010,2012, of the $1.8$2.9 billion and $240$158 million related to pension benefits and other postretirement benefits, $978 million$1.8 billion and $75$69 million, respectively, are included in AOCI, with the remainder included in regulatory assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2009,2011, of the $1.8$2.2 billion and $235 million related to pension benefits, and other postretirement benefits, $1$1.4 billion and $87 million, respectively, areis included in AOCI, with the remainder included in regulatory assets and liabilities.liabilities; the $14 million related to other postretirement benefits consists of $16 million included in regulatory assets and liabilities and $(2) million included in AOCI.

The following table provides the components of AOCI and regulatory assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20102012 that are expected to be amortized as components of periodic benefit cost in 2011:2013:

 

  Pension
Benefits
   Other
Postretirement
Benefits
   

Pension

Benefits

   

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

 
(millions)                

Net actuarial loss

  $96    $12    $185    $9  

Prior service (credit) cost

   3     (6   3     (12

Dominion determines the expected long-term rates of return on plan assets for its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans by using a combination of:

Expected inflation and risk-free interest rate assumptions;

Historical return analysis to determine expectedlong term historic returns as well as historic risk premiums for various asset classes;

Expected future risk premiums, asset volatilities and correlations;

Forecasts of an independent investment advisor;

Forward-looking return expectations derived from the yield on long-term bonds and the price earnings ratiosexpected long-term returns of major stock market indices;

Expected inflation and risk-free interest rate assumptions; and

Investment allocation of plan assets.

Dominion develops assumptions, which are then compared to the forecasts of other independent investment advisors to ensure reasonableness. An internal committee selects the final assumptions.

Dominion determines discount rates from analyses of AA/Aa rated bonds with cash flows matching the expected payments to be made under its plans.

Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for Dominion’s retiree healthcare plans. A one percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have had the following effects:

 

    Other Postretirement Benefits 
    One
percentage
point
increase
   

One

percentage
point

decrease

 
(millions)        

Effect on total of service and interest cost components for 2010

  $23    $(20

Effect on other postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2010

   217     (171
    Other Postretirement Benefits 
    

One

percentage

point

increase

   One
percentage
point
decrease
 
(millions)        

Effect on total of service and interest cost components for 2012

  $17    $(16

Effect on other postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2012

   218     (172

An internal committee selects the final assumptions used for Dominion’s pension and other postretirement plans, including discount rates, expected long-term rates of return and healthcare cost trend rates.

Defined Contribution Plans

In addition, Dominion sponsors defined contribution employee savings plans. During 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008,2010, Dominion recognized $39$40 million, $42$38 million and $39 million, respectively, as employer matching contributions to these plans.

VIRGINIA POWER

Virginia Power participates in the Dominion Pension Plan, a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by Dominion. BenefitsDominion that provides benefits to multiple Dominion subsidiaries. Retirement benefits payable under thethis plan are based primarily on years of service, age and the employee’s compensation. As a participating employer, Virginia Power is subject to Dominion’s funding policy, which is to contribute annually an amount that is in accordance with the provisions of ERISA. During 2010,2012, Virginia Power contributed $302 millionmade no contributions to the defined benefit pension plan.plan and no contributions are currently expected in 2013. Virginia Power’s net periodic pension cost related to this pension plan was $72 million, $50 million and $84 million $48 millionin 2012, 2011 and $32 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The 2010 net periodic pension cost includes the impact of a settlement and curtailment as well as a one-time special termination benefit for certain employees in connection with a workforce reduction program. Employee compensation is the basis for determining Virginia Power’s share of total pension costs.

Virginia Power also participates in the Dominion Retiree Health and Welfare Plan, a plan sponsored by Dominion that provides certain retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits to multiple Dominion subsidiaries. Annual employee premiums are based on several factors such as age, retirement date and years of service. Virginia Power’s net periodic benefit cost related to this plan was $13 million, $23 million and $59 million $55 millionin 2012, 2011 and $33 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Employee headcount is the basis for determining Virginia Power’s share of total other postretirement benefit costs.

Certain regulatory authorities have held that amounts recovered in rates for other postretirement benefits, in excess of benefits actually paid during the year, must be deposited in trust funds dedicated for the sole purpose of paying such benefits. Accordingly, Virginia Power funds other postretirement benefit costs through a VEBA. Virginia Power’sPower made no contributions to the VEBA were $35 million, $34 millionin 2012 and $15 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Virginia Power expectsdoes not expect to contribute approximately $4 million to the VEBA in 2011.2013.

111


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

Dominion holds investments in trusts to fund employee benefit payments for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans, in which Virginia Power’s employees participate. Any investment-related declines in these trusts will result in future increases in the periodic cost recognized for such employee benefit plans and will be included in the determination of the amount of

110


cash that Virginia Power will provide to Dominion for its share of employee benefit plan contributions.

Virginia Power also participates in Dominion-sponsored defined contribution employee savings plans that cover substantially all employees. Employer matching contributions of $14$15 million were incurred in 2012 and $14 million in each of 2010, 20092011 and 2008.2010.

 

 

NOTE 23.22. COMMITMENTSAND CONTINGENCIES

As thea result of issues generated in the ordinary course of business, Dominion and Virginia Power are involved in legal tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts and are periodically subject to governmental examinations (including by regulatory commissionsauthorities), inquiries and investigations. Certain legal proceedings and governmental agencies, some of whichexaminations involve substantialdemands for unspecified amounts of money. The ultimatedamages, are in an initial procedural phase, involve uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions, or involve significant factual issues that need to be resolved, such that it is not possible for the Companies to estimate a range of possible loss. For such matters that the Companies cannot estimate, a statement to this effect is made in the description of the matter. Other matters may have progressed sufficiently through the litigation or investigative processes such that the Companies are able to estimate a range of possible loss. For legal proceedings cannot be predicted at this time; however,and governmental examinations for which the Companies are able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses, an estimated range of possible loss is provided, in excess of the accrued liability (if any) for such matters. Estimated ranges of loss are inclusive of legal fees and net of any anticipated insurance recoveries. This estimated range is based on currently available information and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. This estimated range of possible loss may not represent the Companies’ maximum possible loss exposure. The circumstances of such legal proceedings and governmental examinations will change from time to time and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate. For current proceedings not specifically reported herein,below, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such proceedings would have a material effect on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

Environmental Matters

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to costs resulting from a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect human health and the environment. These laws and regulations affect future planning and existing operations. They can result in increased capital, operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation, containment and monitoring obligations.

AIR

The CAA, as amended, is a comprehensive program utilizing a broad range of regulatory tools to protect and preserve the nation’s air quality. At a minimum, states are required to establish regulatory programs to address all requirements of the CAA. However, states may choose to develop regulatory programs that are more restrictive. Many of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s facilities are subject to the CAA’s permitting and other requirements.

In December 2011, the EPA issued MATS for coal and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units. The rule establishes strict emission limits for mercury, particulate matter as a surrogate for toxic metals and hydrogen chloride as a surrogate for acid gases. The rule includes a limited use provision for oil-fired units with annual capacity factors under 8% that provides an exemption from emission limits, and allows compliance with operational work practice standards. Compliance will be required by April 16, 2015, with certain limited exceptions. In December 2011, Virginia Power recorded a $228 million ($139 million after-tax) charge reflecting plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain regulated coal units, primarily as a result of the issuance of the final MATS. Dominion continues to be governed by individual state mercury emission reduction regulations in Massachusetts and Illinois that are largely unaffected by this rule.

The EPA established CAIR with the intent to require significant reductions in SO2 and NOxemissions from electric generating facilities. In July 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a ruling vacating CAIR. In December 2008, the Court denied rehearing, but also issued a decision to remand CAIR to the EPA. In July 2011, the EPA issued a replacement rule for CAIR, called CSAPR, that required 28 states to reduce power plant emissions that cross state lines. CSAPR established new SO2 and NOxemissions cap and trade programs that were completely independent of the current ARP. Specifically, CSAPR required reductions in SO2 and NOx emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units of 25 MW or more through annual NOx emissions caps, NOx emissions caps during the ozone season (May 1 through September 30) and annual SO2 emission caps with differing requirements for two groups of affected states.

Following numerous petitions by industry participants for review and motions for stay, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a ruling in December 2011 to stay CSAPR pending judicial review. In February and June 2012, the EPA issued technical revisions to CSAPR that are not material to Dominion. In August 2012, the Court vacated CSAPR in its entirety and ordered the EPA to implement CAIR until a valid replacement rule is issued. In October 2012, the EPA filed a petition requesting a rehearing of the court’s decision, which was denied in January 2013. The mandate vacating CSAPR was issued February 4, 2013. The stay of CSAPR remains in effect and the EPA will continue to administer CAIR until such time that the EPA develops and implements new rulemaking addressing the issues identified by the Court. With respect to Dominion’s generation fleet, the cost to comply with CAIR is not expected to be material. Future outcomes of litigation and/or any additional action to issue a revised rule could affect the assessment regarding cost of compliance.

112


In May 2012, the EPA issued final designations for the 75-ppb ozone air quality standard. Several Dominion electric generating facilities are located in areas impacted by this standard. As part of the standard, states will be required to develop and implement plans to address sources emitting pollutants which contribute to the formation of ozone. Until the states have developed implementation plans, Dominion is unable to predict whether or to what extent the new rules will ultimately require additional controls.

In February 2008, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at State Line and Kincaid. In April 2009, Dominion received a second request for information. Dominion provided information in response to both requests. Also in April 2009, Dominion received a Notice and Finding of Violations from the EPA claiming violations of the CAA New Source Review requirements, NSPS, the Title V permit program and the stations’ respective State Implementation Plans. The Notice states that the EPA may issue an order requiring compliance with the relevant CAA provisions and may seek injunctive relief and/or civil penalties, all pursuant to the EPA’s enforcement authority under the CAA. In May 2010, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at Brayton Point. Dominion submitted its response to the request in November 2010.

Dominion believes that it complied with applicable laws and the EPA regulations and interpretations in effect at the time the work in question took place. The CAA authorizes maximum civil penalties of $25,000 to $37,500 per day, per violation at each generating unit, depending on the date of the alleged violation. In addition to any such penalties that may be awarded, an adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures or affect the timing of currently budgeted capital expenditures. Dominion is currently in settlement discussions to resolve these matters. There can be no assurance that Dominion will reach a settlement with the EPA. However, in the past, the EPA has settled similar claims with other energy companies requiring them to pay civil penalties and/or undertake mitigation projects. Dominion has accrued a liability of $13 million, which represents its best estimate of the probable loss related to civil penalties and mitigation projects in this matter, assuming Dominion is able to reach settlement with the EPA and based on the EPA’s settlement of similar claims with other energy companies. Dominion does not believe that final resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

WATER

The CWA, as amended, is a comprehensive program requiring a broad range of regulatory tools including a permit program to authorize and regulate discharges to surface waters with strong enforcement mechanisms. Dominion and Virginia Power must comply with all aspects of the CWA programs at their operating facilities.

In October 2003, the EPA and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection each issued new NPDES permits for Brayton Point. The new permits contained identical conditions that in effect require the installation of cooling towers to address concerns over the withdrawal and discharge of cooling

water. As of the end of the third quarter of 2012, the station was fully converted to closed cycle cooling. The total cost to install these cooling towers was approximately $550 million. See Note 6 for a discussion of impairments related to Brayton Point.

In September 2010, Millstone’s NPDES permit was reissued under the CWA. The conditions of the permit require an evaluation of control technologies that could result in additional expenditures in the future. The report summarizing the results of the evaluation was submitted in August 2012 and is under review by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Dominion cannot currently predict the outcome of this review. In October 2010, the permit issuance was appealed to the state court by a private plaintiff. The permit is expected to remain in effect during the appeal. Dominion is currently unable to make an estimate of the potential financial statement impacts related to this matter.

SOLIDAND HAZARDOUS WASTE

The CERCLA, as amended, provides for immediate response and removal actions coordinated by the EPA in the event of threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment and authorizes the U.S. government either to clean up sites at which hazardous substances have created actual or potential environmental hazards or to order persons responsible for the situation to do so. Under the CERCLA, as amended, generators and transporters of hazardous substances, as well as past and present owners and operators of contaminated sites, can be jointly, severally, and strictly liable for the cost of cleanup. These potentially responsible parties can be ordered to perform a cleanup, be sued for costs associated with an EPA-directed cleanup, voluntarily settle with the U.S. government concerning their liability for cleanup costs, or voluntarily begin a site investigation and site remediation under state oversight.

From time to time, Dominion or Virginia Power may be identified as a potentially responsible party to a Superfund site. The EPA (or a state) can either allow such a party to conduct and pay for a remedial investigation, feasibility study and remedial action or conduct the remedial investigation and action itself and then seek reimbursement from the potentially responsible parties. Each party can be held jointly, severally and strictly liable for the cleanup costs. These parties can also bring contribution actions against each other and seek reimbursement from their insurance companies. As a result, Dominion or Virginia Power may be responsible for the costs of remedial investigation and actions under the Superfund law or other laws or regulations regarding the remediation of waste. Except as noted below, the Companies do not believe this will have a material effect on results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.

In September 2011, the EPA issued a UAO to Virginia Power and 22 other parties, ordering specific remedial action of certain areas at the Ward Transformer Superfund site located in Raleigh, North Carolina. Virginia Power does not believe it is a liable party under CERCLA based on its alleged connection to the site. In November 2011, Virginia Power and a number of other parties notified the EPA that they are declining to undertake the work set forth in the UAO.

The EPA may seek to enforce a UAO in court pursuant to its enforcement authority under CERCLA, and may seek recovery of its costs in undertaking removal or remedial action. If the court determines that a respondent failed to comply with the UAO

113


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

without sufficient cause, the EPA may also seek civil penalties of up to $37,500 per day for the violation and punitive damages of up to three times the costs incurred by the EPA as a result of the party’s failure to comply with the UAO. Virginia Power is currently unable to make an estimate of the potential financial statement impacts related to the Ward Transformer matter.

Dominion has determined that it is associated with 17 former manufactured gas plant sites, three of which pertain to Virginia Power. Studies conducted by other utilities at their former manufactured gas plant sites have indicated that those sites contain coal tar and other potentially harmful materials. None of the former sites with which Dominion and Virginia Power are associated is under investigation by any state or federal environmental agency. At one of the former sites, Dominion is conducting a state-approved post closure groundwater monitoring program and an environmental land use restriction has been recorded. Another site has been accepted into a state-based voluntary remediation program. Dominion is currently evaluating the nature and extent of the contamination from this site as well as potential remedial options, but is not yet able to estimate the future remediation costs. Due to the uncertainty surrounding these sites, Dominion is unable to make an estimate of the potential financial statement impacts related to these sites.

CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATIONAND REGULATION

Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut, among other states, have joined RGGI, a multi-state effort to reduce CO2 emissions in the Northeast implemented through state specific regulations. Under the initiative, aggregate CO2 emissions from power plants in participating states are required to be stabilized at current levels from 2009 to 2015. Further reductions from current levels would be required to be phased in starting in 2016 such that by 2019 there would be a 10% reduction in participating state power plant CO2 emissions. During 2012, RGGI underwent a program review, and in February 2013, revisions to the RGGI model rule were issued. Dominion is in the process of evaluating these revisions as to potential impacts on Dominion’s fossil fired generation operations in RGGI states. Until this evaluation is completed, Dominion is unable to estimate the potential financial statement impacts related to the program review.

Two of Dominion’s facilities, Brayton Point and Manchester Street, are subject to RGGI. Beginning with calendar year 2009, RGGI requires that Dominion cover each ton of CO2 direct stack emissions from these facilities with either an allowance or an offset. The allowances can be purchased through auction or through a secondary market. Dominion has periodically participated in RGGI allowance auctions to date and has procured allowances to meet its estimated compliance requirements under RGGI’s current requirement through 2013 and most of 2014, therefore Dominion does not expect compliance with RGGI to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition. During June 2011, a lawsuit was filed in New York seeking to retroactively rescind RGGI participation by that state. A percentage of Dominion’s RGGI allowances had been acquired from New York. The allocated value of these allowances totaled approximately $38 million, of which all have been expensed as consumed for RGGI Phase I compliance. In February 2012, Dominion surrendered these New York RGGI allowances for the

RGGI Phase I compliance period and therefore does not expect any significant financial statement impacts from this lawsuit as it no longer holds allowances issued by the state of New York. In June 2012, a New York state court dismissed the lawsuit. A notice of appeal was filed in July 2012, however no appeal was filed.

MF Global

Prior to October 31, 2011, certain of Dominion’s subsidiaries executed certain commodity transactions on exchanges using MF Global, an FCM registered with the CFTC. In order to secure its potential exposure on these commodity transactions, Dominion posted certain required margin collateral with MF Global. The parent company of MF Global, MF Global Holdings Ltd., filed for bankruptcy relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on October 31, 2011. On the same date, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed a trustee to oversee the liquidation of MF Global pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act.

In accordance with court-approved procedures, Dominion transferred to other FCMs all open positions executed using MF Global. The initial margin posted for these open positions at October 31, 2011 was approximately $73 million. Dominion had received approximately $17 million of this amount through the liquidation process as of December 31, 2012. In January 2013, Dominion sold the remaining claims of approximately $56 million to a third party at a small discount.

Nuclear Matters

In March 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami caused significant damage at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in northeast Japan. These events have resulted in significant nuclear safety reviews required by the NRC and industry groups such as INPO. Like other U.S. nuclear operators, Dominion has been gathering supporting data and participating in industry initiatives focused on the ability to respond to and mitigate the consequences of design-basis and beyond-design-basis events at its stations.

In July 2011, an NRC task force provided initial recommendations based on its review of the Fukushima Daiichi accident and in October 2011 the NRC staff prioritized these recommendations into Tiers 1, 2 and 3, with the Tier 1 recommendations consisting of actions which the staff determined should be started without unnecessary delay. In December 2011, the NRC Commissioners approved the agency staff’s prioritization and recommendations; and that same month an appropriations act directed the NRC to require reevaluation of external hazards (not limited to seismic and flooding hazards) as soon as possible.

Based on the prioritized recommendations, in March 2012, the NRC issued orders and information requests requiring specific reviews and actions to all operating reactors, construction permit holders and combined license holders based on the lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi event. The orders applicable to Dominion require implementation of safety enhancements related to mitigation strategies to respond to extreme natural events resulting in the loss of power at plants, and enhancing spent fuel pool instrumentation. The orders require prompt implementation of the safety enhancements and completion of implementation within two refueling outages or by December 31, 2016, whichever comes first. The information requests issued by

114


the NRC request each reactor to reevaluate the seismic and flooding hazards at their site using present-day methods and information, conduct walkdowns of their facilities to ensure protection against the hazards in their current design basis, and to reevaluate their emergency communications systems and staffing levels. Dominion and Virginia Power do not currently expect that compliance with the NRC’s March 2012 orders and information requests will materially impact their financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the approximately four-year implementation period. The NRC staff is evaluating the implementation of the longer term Tier 2 and Tier 3 recommendations. Dominion and Virginia Power are currently unable to estimate the potential financial impacts related to compliance with Tier 2 and Tier 3 recommendations.

Long-Term Purchase Agreements

At December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power had the following long-term commitments that are noncancelable or are cancelable only under certain conditions, and that third parties have used to secure financing for the facilities that will provide the contracted goods or services:

 

 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Thereafter Total  2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total 
(millions)                              

Purchased electric capacity(1)

 $342   $347   $351   $358   $338   $779   $2,515   $350   $358   $337   $275   $181   $327   $1,828  

 

(1)Commitments represent estimated amounts payable for capacity under power purchase contracts with qualifying facilities and independent power producers, the last of which ends in 2021. Capacity payments under the contracts are generally based on fixed dollar amounts per month, subject to escalation using broad-based economic indices. At December 31, 2010,2012, the present value of Virginia Power’s total commitment for capacity payments is $1.8$1.4 billion. Capacity payments totaled $344$337 million, $356$338 million, and $379$344 million, and energy payments totaled $214 million, $275 million, and $303 million $254 million,for 2012, 2011 and $372 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Lease Commitments

Dominion and Virginia Power lease various facilities, vehicles and equipment primarily under operating leases. Payments under certain leases are escalated based on an index such as the consumer price index. Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating and capital leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 20102012 are as follows:

 

  2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   Thereafter   Total   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   Thereafter   Total 
(millions)                                                        

Dominion

  $184    $174    $138    $60    $48    $193    $797    $79    $72    $64    $55    $63    $161    $494  

Virginia Power

  $36    $28    $17    $14    $12    $23    $130    $26    $24    $19    $15    $11    $26    $121  

Rental expense for Dominion totaled $112 million, $155 million, and $171 million $172 million,for 2012, 2011 and $160 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Rental expense for Virginia Power totaled $48 million, $50 million, $49 mil-

lion, and $39$50 million for 2010, 2009,2012, 2011, and 2008,2010, respectively. The majority of rental expense is reflected in other operations and maintenance expense.

Dominion leases Fairless, which began commercial operations in June 2004. During construction, Dominion acted as the construction agent for the lessor, controlled the design and construction of the facility and has since been reimbursed for all project costs ($898 million) advanced to the lessor. Dominion makes annual lease payments of $53 million that are reflectedexpense in the lease commitments table. The lease expires in 2013 and at that time, Dominion may renew the lease at negotiated amounts based on original project costs and current market conditions, subject to lessor approval; purchase Fairless at its original construction cost plus 51%Consolidated Statements of any appraised value in excess of original construction cost; or sell Fairless, on behalf of the lessor, to an independent third party. If Fairless is sold and the proceeds from the sale are less than its original construction cost, Dominion would be required to make a payment to the lessor in an amount up to 70.75% of the original project costs adjusted for certain other costs as specified in the lease. The lease agreement does not contain any provisions that involve credit rating or stock price trigger events.

Environmental Matters

Dominion and Virginia Power are subject to costs resulting from a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect human health and the environment. These laws and regulations affect future planning and existing operations. They can result in increased capital, operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation, containment and monitoring obligations.

AIR

The CAA is a comprehensive program utilizing a broad range of regulatory tools to protect and preserve the nation’s air quality. At a minimum, states are required to establish regulatory programs to address all requirements of the CAA. However, states may choose to develop regulatory programs that are more restrictive. Many of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s facilities are subject to the CAA’s permitting and other requirements.

In May 2010, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at Brayton Point and Salem Harbor. Dominion submitted its response to this request in November 2010 and cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

In February 2008, Dominion received a request for information pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA from the EPA. The request concerns historical operating changes and capital improvements undertaken at State Line and Kincaid. In April 2009, Dominion received a second request for information. Dominion provided information in response to both requests. Also in April 2009, Dominion received a Notice and Finding of Violations from the EPA claiming violations of the CAA New Source Review requirements, New Source Performance Standards, the Title V permit program and the stations’ respective State Implementation Plans. The Notice states that the EPA may issue an order requiring compliance with the relevant CAA provisions and may seek injunctive relief and/or civil penalties, all pursuant to the EPA’s enforcementIncome.

111


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

authority under the CAA. Dominion cannot predict the outcome of this matter. However, an adverse resolution could have a material effect on future results of operations and/or cash flows.

In March 2005, the EPA promulgated regulations finalizing CAIR and CAMR. In February 2008, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a ruling vacating CAMR. The EPA is proceeding with the development of a MACT rulemaking for coal and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units. These rules could require significant reductions in mercury and other HAPs from electric generation facilities. It should be noted that Dominion continues to be governed by individual state mercury emission reduction regulations in Massachusetts and Illinois that were largely unaffected by the CAMR ruling.

In July 2008, the Court issued a ruling vacating CAIR. In December 2008, the Court denied rehearing, but also issued a decision to remand CAIR to the EPA. The CAIR rules remain in effect until such time that the EPA develops and implements new rulemaking addressing the issues identified by the Court. In July 2010, the EPA announced a proposed new rule, called the Transport Rule, which will eventually replace CAIR, and, as proposed, requires significant reductions in SO2 and NOX emissions.

The EPA has finalized rules establishing a new 1-hour NAAQS for NO2 (January 2010) and a new 1-hour NAAQS for SO2 (June 2010), which could require additional NOX and SO2 controls in certain areas where the Companies operate. Until the states have developed implementation plans for these standards, the impact on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s facilities that emit NOX and SO2 is uncertain. However, based on a preliminary assessment, Dominion has determined that the new 1-hour SO2 NAAQS will likely require significant future capital expenditures at State Line, and, accordingly, recorded an impairment charge on this facility in the second quarter of 2010. In January 2010, the EPA also proposed a new, more stringent NAAQS for ozone. Until the rulemaking for the Transport Rule is complete and the states have developed implementation plans for the new NO2, SO2 and ozone standards, it is not possible to determine the impact on Dominion’s or Virginia Power’s facilities that emit NOX and SO2. The Companies cannot currently predict with certainty whether or to what extent the new rules will ultimately require additional controls, however, if significant expenditures are required, it could adversely affect Dominion’s results of operations, and Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s cash flows.

In June 2005, the EPA finalized amendments to the Regional Haze Rule, also known as the Clean Air Visibility Rule. Although Dominion and Virginia Power anticipate that the emission reductions achieved through compliance with other CAA required programs will generally address this rule, additional emission reduction requirements may be imposed on the Companies’ facilities.

Implementation of projects to comply with SO2, NOX and mercury limitations, and other state emission control programs are ongoing and will be influenced by changes in the regulatory environment, availability of emission allowances and emission control technology. In response to federal and state regulatory requirements, Dominion and Virginia Power estimate that they will make capital expenditures at their affected generating facilities of approximately $2.4 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, during the period 2011 through 2015.

In December 2010, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality approved an air permit to construct the power station development project in Warren County, Virginia. In connection with the air permit process, Virginia Power reached an agreement with the National Park Service to permanently retire the North Branch power station, a 74 MW coal fired plant located in West Virginia, once the Warren County power station begins commercial operations.

In June 2010, the Conservation Law Foundation and Healthlink, Inc., filed a Complaint in the District Court of Massachusetts against Dominion Energy New England, Inc. alleging that Salem Harbor units 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been and are in violation of visible emissions standards and monitoring requirements of the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan and the station’s state and federal operating permits. Although Dominion cannot predict the outcome of this matter at this time, it is not expected to have a material effect on results of operations.

In June 2008, the Virginia State Air Pollution Control Board approved and issued an air permit to construct and operate the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center and also approved and issued another air permit for hazardous emissions. Construction of the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center commenced and the facility is expected to be in operation by 2012. In August 2008, SELC, on behalf of four environmental groups, filed Petitions for Appeal in Richmond Circuit Court challenging the approval of both of the air permits. The Richmond Circuit Court issued an Order in September 2009 upholding the initial air permit and upholding the second air permit for hazardous emissions except for one condition related to the permit limit for mercury emissions. In September 2009, the hazardous emissions air permit was amended by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to comply with the Richmond Circuit Court Order. The permit amendment does not impact the project. In October 2009, SELC filed a Notice of Appeal of the court’s Order regarding the initial air permit with the Richmond Circuit Court, initiating the appeals process to the Virginia Court of Appeals. In May 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Circuit Court’s opinion in the appeal of the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center’s air permit. SELC did not further appeal the Court of Appeals decision to the Supreme Court of Virginia.

WATER

The CWA is a comprehensive program requiring a broad range of regulatory tools including a permit program to authorize and regulate discharges to surface waters with strong enforcement mechanisms. Dominion and Virginia Power must comply with all aspects of the CWA programs at their operating facilities. In July 2004, the EPA published regulations under CWA Section 316b that govern existing utilities that employ a cooling water intake structure and that have flow levels exceeding a minimum threshold. The EPA’s rule presented several compliance options. However, in January 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision on an appeal of the regulations, remanding the rule to the EPA. In July 2007, the EPA suspended the regulations pending further rulemaking, consistent with the decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In November 2007, a number of industries appealed the lower court decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. In April 2008, the

112


U.S. Supreme Court granted the industry request to review the question of whether Section 316b of the CWA authorizes the EPA to compare costs with benefits in determining the best technology available for minimizing “adverse environmental impact” at cooling water intake structures. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in April 2009 that the EPA has the authority to consider costs versus environmental benefits in selecting best technology available for reducing impacts of cooling water intakes at power stations. It is currently unknown how the EPA will interpret the ruling in its ongoing rulemaking activity addressing cooling water intakes as well as how the states will implement this decision. Dominion has sixteen facilities, including eight at Virginia Power, that are likely to be subject to these regulations. In November 2010, the EPA settled with the original litigants and agreed to publish a proposed rule no later than March 14, 2011 and a final rule no later than July 27, 2012. Dominion and Virginia Power cannot predict the outcome of the EPA regulatory processes, nor can they determine with any certainty what specific controls may be required.

In August 2006, the CDEP issued a notice of a Tentative Determination to renew the NPDES permit for Millstone, which included a draft copy of the revised permit. In October 2007, CDEP issued a report to the hearing officer for the tentative determination stating the agency’s intent to further revise the draft permit. In December 2007, the CDEP issued a new draft permit. An administrative hearing on the draft permit began in January 2009 and was completed in February 2009. In February 2010, the hearing officer issued a proposed final decision, recommending that the CDEP Commissioner issue the revised draft permit without change. In September 2010, the permit was reissued under the CWA. The conditions of the permit require an evaluation of control technologies that could result in additional expenditures in the future, however Dominion cannot currently predict the outcome of this evaluation. In October 2010, the permit issuance was appealed to the state court by a private plaintiff. The permit is expected to remain in effect during the appeal.

In October 2003, the EPA and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection each issued new NPDES permits for Brayton Point. The new permits contained identical conditions that in effect require the installation of cooling towers to address concerns over the withdrawal and discharge of cooling water. Currently, Dominion estimates the total cost to install these cooling towers at approximately $600 million, with remaining expenditures of $354 million included in its planned capital expenditures through 2012.

In October 2007, the VSWCB issued a renewed VPDES permit for North Anna. BREDL, and other persons, appealed the VSWCB’s decision to the Richmond Circuit Court, challenging several permit provisions related to North Anna’s discharge of cooling water. In February 2009, the court ruled that the VSWCB was required to regulate the thermal discharge from North Anna into the waste heat treatment facility. Virginia Power filed a motion for reconsideration with the court in February 2009, which was denied. The final order was issued by the court in September 2009. The court’s order allows North Anna to continue to operate pursuant to the currently issued VPDES permit. In October 2009, Virginia Power filed a Notice of Appeal of the court’s Order with the Richmond Circuit Court, initiating the appeals process to the Virginia Court of Appeals. In June 2010,

the Virginia Court of Appeals reversed the Richmond Circuit Court’s September 2009 order. The Virginia Court of Appeals held that the lower court had applied the wrong standard of review, and that the VSWCB’s determination not to regulate the station’s thermal discharge into the waste heat treatment facility was lawful. In July 2010, BREDL and the other original appellants filed a petition for appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia requesting that it review the Court of Appeals’ decision. In December 2010, the Supreme Court of Virginia granted BREDL’s petition. Briefing on the merits of the case will occur during the first quarter of 2011. Until the appeals process is complete and any revised permit is issued, it is not possible to predict with certainty any financial impact that may result, however, an adverse resolution could have a material effect on Virginia Power’s cash flows.

SOLIDAND HAZARDOUS WASTE

The CERCLA, as amended, provides for immediate response and removal actions coordinated by the EPA in the event of threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment and authorizes the U.S. government either to clean up sites at which hazardous substances have created actual or potential environmental hazards or to order persons responsible for the situation to do so. Under the CERCLA as amended, generators and transporters of hazardous substances, as well as past and present owners and operators of contaminated sites, can be strictly, jointly and severally liable for the cost of cleanup. These potentially responsible parties can be ordered to perform a cleanup, be sued for costs associated with an EPA-directed cleanup, voluntarily settle with the U.S. government concerning their liability for cleanup costs, or voluntarily begin a site investigation and site remediation under state oversight.

From time to time, Dominion or Virginia Power may be identified as a potentially responsible party to a Superfund site. The EPA (or a state) can either allow such a party to conduct and pay for a remedial investigation, feasibility study and remedial action or conduct the remedial investigation and action itself and then seek reimbursement from the potentially responsible parties. Each party can be held jointly, severally and strictly liable for the cleanup costs. These parties can also bring contribution actions against each other and seek reimbursement from their insurance companies. As a result, Dominion or Virginia Power may be responsible for the costs of remedial investigation and actions under the Superfund law or other laws or regulations regarding the remediation of waste. The Companies do not believe that any currently identified sites will result in significant liabilities.

Dominion has determined that it is associated with 17 former manufactured gas plant sites. Studies conducted by other utilities at their former manufactured gas plant sites have indicated that those sites contain coal tar and other potentially harmful materials. None of the 17 former sites with which Dominion is associated is under investigation by any state or federal environmental agency. At one of the former sites Dominion is conducting a state-approved post closure groundwater monitoring program and an environmental land use restriction has been recorded. Another site has been accepted into a state-based voluntary remediation program and Dominion has not yet estimated the future remediation costs. It is not known to what degree the other former sites may contain environmental contamination. Dominion

113


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

is not able to estimate the cost, if any, that may be required for the possible remediation of these other sites.

In June 2010, the EPA proposed federal regulations under the RCRA for management of coal combustion by-products generated by power plants. The EPA is considering two possible options for the regulation of coal combustion by-products, both of which fall under the RCRA. Under the first proposal, the EPA would classify these by-products as special wastes subject to regulation under subtitle C, the hazardous waste provisions of the RCRA, when destined for disposal at landfills or surface impoundments. Under the second proposal, the EPA would regulate coal combustion by-products under subtitle D of the RCRA, the section for non-hazardous wastes. While the Companies cannot currently predict the outcome of this matter, regulation under either option will affect Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s onsite disposal facilities and coal combustion by-product management practices, and potentially require material investments.

CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATIONAND REGULATION

In December 2009, the EPA issued theirFinal Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, finding that GHGs “endanger both the public health and the public welfare of current and future generations.” On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration announced a joint final rule establishing a program that will dramatically reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the United States. These rules took effect in January 2011 and established GHG emissions as regulated pollutants under the CAA. In May 2010, the EPA issued theFinal Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rulethat, combined with these prior actions, will require Dominion and Virginia Power to obtain permits for GHG emissions for new and modified facilities over certain size thresholds, and meet best available control technology for GHG emissions beginning in 2011. The EPA has issued draft guidance for GHG permitting, including best available control technology. EPA has also announced a schedule for proposing regulations of GHG emissions under the New Source Performance Standards that would apply to new and existing electric generating units. Also, the Companies expect continued regulatory action at the state level on the regulation of GHG emissions in the future. Any of these new or contemplated regulations above may affect capital costs, or create significant permitting delays, for new or modified facilities that emit GHGs.

There are other legislative proposals that may be considered that would have an indirect impact on GHG emissions. There is the potential for the Congress to consider a mandatory Clean Energy Standard or to promote greater energy efficiency through early retirements of coal-fired power plants.

In addition to possible federal action, some regions and states in which Dominion and Virginia Power operate have already adopted or may adopt GHG emission reduction programs. For example, the Virginia Energy Plan, released by the Governor of Virginia in September 2007, includes a goal of reducing GHG emissions state-wide back to 2000 levels by 2025. The Governor formed a Commission on Climate Change to develop a plan to achieve this goal. In November 2008, the Commission formulated its recommendations to the Governor.

In July 2008, Massachusetts passed the GWSA. Among other provisions, the GWSA sets economy-wide GHG emissions reduction goals for Massachusetts, including reductions of 10% to 25% below 1990 levels by 2020, interim goals for 2030 and 2040 and reductions of 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Regulations requiring the implementation of the GWSA have not yet been proposed. Dominion operates two coal/oil-fired generating power stations in Massachusetts and acts as a retail electric supplier in Massachusetts and all of these entities are subject to the implementation of the GWSA.

Additionally, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut, among other states, have joined the RGGI, a multi-state effort to reduce CO2 emissions in the Northeast implemented through state specific regulations. Under the initiative, aggregate CO2 emissions from power plants in participating states are required to be stabilized at current levels from 2009 to 2015. Further reductions from current levels would be required to be phased in starting in 2016 such that by 2019 there would be a 10% reduction in participating state power plant CO2 emissions. During 2011 and possibly continuing through 2012, RGGI will undergo a program review which could impact regulations and implementation of RGGI. The impact of this program review on Dominion’s fossil fired generation operations in RGGI states is unknown at this time.

Three of Dominion’s facilities, Brayton Point, Salem Harbor and Manchester Street, are subject to RGGI. Beginning with calendar year 2009, RGGI requires that Dominion cover each ton of CO2 direct stack emissions from these facilities with either an allowance or an offset. The allowances can be purchased through auction or through a secondary market. Dominion participated in RGGI allowance auctions to date and has procured allowances to meet its estimated compliance requirements under RGGI for 2009 and 2010 and partially for 2011. Dominion does not expect these allowances to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2009, the governors of 11 Northeast and mid-Atlantic states, including Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island (RGGI states plus Pennsylvania) signed a memorandum of understanding committing their states toward developing a low carbon fuel standard to reduce GHG emissions from vehicles. The memorandum of understanding establishes a process to develop a regional framework by 2011 and examine the economic impacts of a low carbon fuel standard program.

The U.S. is currently not a party to the Kyoto Protocol, which is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change that became effective for signatories on February 16, 2005. The Kyoto Protocol process generally requires developed countries to cap GHG emissions at certain levels during the 2008-2012 time period. At the conclusion of the December 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, the Copenhagen Accord was adopted, which includes a collection of non-binding, voluntary actions by various countries, including the U.S, to keep the increase in global mean temperature below 2 degrees Celsius. It does not include specific emissions targets, but calls for industrial nations to offer up emissions reduction targets for 2020. The U.S. is expected to participate in this process.

114


Nuclear Operations

NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING—MINIMUM FINANCIAL ASSURANCE

The NRC requires nuclear power plant owners to annually update minimum financial assurance amounts for the future decommissioning of their nuclear facilities. Decommissioning involves the decontamination and removal of radioactive contaminants from a nuclear power station once operations have ceased, in accordance with standards established by the NRC. The 20102012 calculation for the NRC minimum financial assurance amount, aggregated for Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear units, excluding joint owners’ assurance amounts, was $3.1$3.3 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, and has been satisfied by a combination of the funds being collected and deposited in the nuclear decommissioning trusts and the real annual rate of return growth of the funds allowed by the NRC. The 20102012 NRC minimum financial assurance amounts shown were calculated using September 30, 2010preliminary December 31, 2012 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics indices. The final NRC minimum financial assurance amounts that will be filed with the NRC in March 2011 will most likely be based on December 31, 2010 indices. Dominion does not anticipate a material difference between the NRC minimum financial assurance amounts shown and the final NRC minimum financial amounts to be filed with the NRC. Dominion believes that the amounts currently available in its decommissioning trusts and their expected earnings will be sufficient to cover expected decommissioning costs for the Millstone and Kewaunee units. Virginia Power also believes that the decommissioning funds and their expected earnings for the Surry and North Anna units will be sufficient to cover expected decommissioning costs, particularly when combined with future ratepayer collections and contributions to these decommissioning trusts, if such future collections and contributions are required. This reflects a positive long-term outlook for trust fund investment returns as the decommissioning of the units will not be decommissionedcomplete for decades. Dominion and Virginia Power will continue to monitor these trusts to ensure they meet the minimum financial assurance requirement, which may include the use of parent company guarantees, surety bonding or other financial guarantees recognized by the NRC. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Kewaunee.

NUCLEAR INSURANCE

The Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 provides the public up to $12.6 billion of liability protection per nuclear incident, via obligations required of owners of nuclear power plants. The Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988plants, and allows for an inflationary provision adjustment every five years. Dominion and Virginia Power have purchased $375 million of coverage from commercial insurance pools for each reactor site with the remainder provided through a mandatory industry risk-sharing program. In the event of a nuclear incident at any licensed nuclear reactor in the U.S., the Companies could be assessed up to $118 million for each of their licensed reactors not to exceed $18 million per year per reactor. There is no limit to the number of incidents for which this retrospective premium can be assessed.

The current level of property insurance coverage for Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s nuclear units is as follows:

 

  Coverage   Coverage 
(billions)        

Dominion

    

Millstone

  $2.75    $2.75  

Kewaunee

   1.80     1.80  

Virginia Power

  

Virginia Power(1)

  

Surry

  $2.55    $2.55  

North Anna

   2.55     2.55  

(1)Surry and North Anna share a blanket property limit of $1 billion.

115


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

The Companies’ coverage exceeds the NRC minimum requirement for nuclear power plant licensees of $1.06 billion per reactor site and includes coverage for premature decommissioning and functional total loss. The NRC requires that the proceeds from this insurance be used first, to return the reactor to and maintain it in a safe and stable condition and second, to decontaminate the reactor and station site in accordance with a plan approved by the NRC. Nuclear property insurance is provided by NEIL, a mutual insurance company, and is subject to retrospective premium assessments in any policy year in which losses exceed the funds available to the insurance company. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s maximum retrospective premium assessment for the current policy period is $77$89 million and $39$48 million, respectively. Based on the severity of the incident, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the nuclear insurerNEIL has the discretion to lower or eliminate the maximum retrospective premium assessment. Dominion and Virginia Power have the financial responsibility for any losses that exceed the limits or for which insurance proceeds are not available because they must first be used for stabilization and decontamination.

Dominion and Virginia Power also purchase insurance from NEIL to mitigate certain expenses, including replacement power costs, associated with the prolonged outage of a nuclear unit due to direct physical damage. Under this program, the Companies are subject to a retrospective premium assessment for any policy year in which losses exceed funds available to NEIL. Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s maximum retrospective premium assessment for the current policy period is $32$33 million and $18$20 million, respectively.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, Dominion announced plans to close and decommission Kewaunee. Kewaunee is expected to cease power production in the second quarter of 2013 and commence decommissioning activities. Effective February 1, 2013, Kewaunee’s accidental outage policy for replacement power costs has been cancelled, and Kewaunee’s property coverage of $1.8 billion did not change. The cancellation of Kewaunee’s accidental outage policy for replacement power costs lowered Dominion’s retrospective premium assessment from $33 million to $30 million.

ODEC, a part owner of North Anna, and Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and Central Vermont Public ServiceGreen Mountain Power Corporation, part owners of Millstone’s Unit 3, are responsible to Dominion and Virginia Power for their share of the nuclear decommissioning obligation and insurance premiums on applicable units, including any retrospective premium assessments and any losses not covered by insurance.

SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL

Under provisions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Dominion and Virginia Power entered into contracts with the DOE for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel.fuel under provisions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. The DOE failed to begin accepting the spent fuel on January 31, 1998, the date provided by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and by the Companies’ contracts with the DOE. The Companies have previously received damages award payments and settlement payments related to these contracts.

Dominion and Virginia Power have resolved additional claims for damages incurred at Millstone, Kewaunee, Surry and North Anna. In May 2012, Dominion made formal offers of settlement to the Authorized Representative of the Attorney General for resolution of claims incurred at Millstone for the period July 1,

2006 through December 31, 2010 and periodic payments after that date through 2013 and for resolution of claims incurred at Kewaunee for the period January 2004,1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 and periodic payments after that date through 2013. In September 2012, Dominion and the government entered into settlement agreements. Initial settlement payments in the amounts of $20 million for Millstone and $6 million for Kewaunee were received in the fourth quarter of 2012. In September 2012, Virginia Power made a formal offer of settlement for resolution of claims incurred at Surry and North Anna for the period July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2010 and periodic payments after that date through 2013. In November 2012, Virginia Power and the government entered into a settlement agreement. An initial settlement payment in the amount of $75 million for Surry and North Anna was received in the fourth quarter of 2012. All of the settlement agreements are extendable after 2013 by mutual agreement of the parties. In June 2012, Dominion and Virginia Power filed lawsuits in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for Millstone, Surry and North Anna against the DOE requesting additional damages in connection with its failurefor the period July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2010. The lawsuits have been dismissed as a result of the settlement agreements.

The Companies continue to commence acceptingrecognize receivables for certain spent nuclear fuel. A trial occurred in May 2008 and post-trial briefing and argument concluded in July 2008. On October 15, 2008, the Court issued an opinion and order for Dominion in the amount of approximately $155 million, which includes approximately $112 million in damages incurred by Virginia Power for spent fuel-related costs at its Surry and North Anna power stations and approximately $43 million in damages incurredthat they believe are probable of recovery from the DOE. Dominion’s receivables for spent nuclear fuel-related costs totaled $36 million and $102 million at Dominion’s Millstone power station through June 30, 2006. Judgment was entered by the Court on October 28, 2008. In December 2008, the government appealed the judgment to the U. S. Court of Appeals31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Virginia Power’s receivables for the Federal Circuit and the appeal was docketed. In March 2009, the Federal Circuit granted the government’s

115


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

request to stay the appeal. In May 2010, the stay was lifted, and the government’s initial brief in the appeal was filed in June 2010. The issues raised by the government on appeal pertain to the damages awarded to Dominion for Millstone. The government did not take issue with the damages awarded to Virginia Power for Surry or North Anna. As a result, Virginia Power recognized a receivable in the amount of $174 million, largely offset against property, plant and equipment and regulatory assets and liabilities, representing certain spent nuclear fuel-related costs incurred through June 30, 2010. Briefing on the appeal was concluded in September 2010totaled $26 million and oral argument took place before the Federal Circuit in January 2011. Payment of any damages will not occur until the appeal process has been resolved.

A lawsuit was also filed for Kewaunee. In August 2010, Dominion and the federal government reached a settlement resolving Dominion’s claims for damages incurred$76 million at Kewaunee through December 31, 2008. The approximately $21 million settlement payment was received in September 2010.

2012 and 2011, respectively. The Companies will continue to manage their spent fuel until it is accepted by the DOE.

Virginia Power and Kewaunee continue to recognize receivables for certain spent nuclear fuel-related costs that are probable of recovery from the DOE.

Guarantees, Surety Bonds and Letters of Credit

DOMINION

At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had issued $131$92 million of guarantees, primarily to support equity method investees. No significant amounts related to these guarantees have been recorded. As of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion’s exposure under these guarantees was $54$62 million, primarily related to certain reserve requirements associated with non-recourse financing. During the first quarter of 2010, Dominion’s $165 million limited-scope guarantee and indemnification for one-half of NedPower’s project-level financing, relating to litigation seeking to halt the NedPower wind farm, was formally terminated with the consent of NedPower’s lenders as a result of the dismissal by the applicable court of such litigation pursuant to an agreed dismissal order.

In addition to the above guarantees, Dominion and its partners, Shell and BP, may be required to make additional periodic equity contributions to NedPower and Fowler Ridge in connection with certain funding requirements associated with their respective non-recourse financings. As of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion’s maximum remaining cumulative exposure under these equity funding agreements is $144$107 million through 2019 and its maximum annual future contributions could range from approximately $16$4 million to $19 million. Dominion expects the operating cash flows from these projects to be sufficient to meet their financing requirements.

Dominion also enters into guarantee arrangements on behalf of its consolidated subsidiaries, primarily to facilitate their commercial transactions with third parties. To the extent that a liability subject to a guarantee has been incurred by one of Dominion’s consolidated subsidiaries, that liability is included in itsthe Consolidated Financial Statements. Dominion is not required to recognize liabilities for guarantees issued on behalf of its subsidiaries unless it becomes probable that it will have to perform under the guarantees. Terms of the guarantees typically end once

obligations have been paid. Dominion currently believes it is

116


unlikely that it would be required to perform or otherwise incur any losses associated with guarantees of its subsidiaries’ obligations.

At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion had issued the following subsidiary guarantees:

 

  Stated Limit   Value(1)   Stated Limit   Value(1) 
(millions)                

Subsidiary debt(2)

  $126    $126    $363    $363  

Commodity transactions(3)

   3,001     375     2,939     377  

Lease obligation for power generation facility(4)

   757     757  

Nuclear obligations(5)

   231     52  

Other

   498     126  

Nuclear obligations(4)

   231     77  

Other(5)

   673     98  

Total

  $4,613    $1,436    $4,206    $915  

 

(1)Represents the estimated portion of the guarantee’s stated limit that is utilized as of December 31, 20102012 based upon prevailing economic conditions and fact patterns specific to each guarantee arrangement. For those guarantees related to obligations that are recorded as liabilities by Dominion’s subsidiaries, the value includes the recorded amount.
(2)Guarantees of debt of certain DEI subsidiaries. In the event of default by the subsidiaries, Dominion would be obligated to repay such amounts.
(3)Guarantees related to energy trading and marketing activities and other commodity commitments of certain subsidiaries, including subsidiaries of Virginia Power and DEI. These guarantees were provided to counterparties in order to facilitate physical and financial transactions in gas, oil, electricity, pipeline capacity, transportation and related commodities and services. If any of these subsidiaries fail to perform or pay under the contracts and the counterparties seek performance or payment, Dominion would be obligated to satisfy such obligation. Dominion and its subsidiaries receive similar guarantees as collateral for credit extended to others. The value provided includes certain guarantees that do not have stated limits.
(4)Guarantee of a DEI subsidiary’s leasing obligation for Fairless.
(5)Guarantees related to certain DEI subsidiaries’ potential retrospective premiums that could be assessed if there is a nuclear incident under Dominion’s nuclear insurance programs and guarantees for a DEI subsidiary’s and Virginia Power’s commitment to buy nuclear fuel. Excludes Dominion’s agreement to provide up to $150 million and $60 million to two DEI subsidiaries to pay the operating expenses of Millstone and Kewaunee, respectively, in the event of a prolonged outage, as part of satisfying certain NRC requirements concerned with ensuring adequate funding for the operations of nuclear power stations. The agreement for Kewaunee also provides for funds through the completion of decommissioning.
(5)Guarantees related to other miscellaneous contractual obligations such as leases, environmental obligations and construction projects. Also includes guarantees related to certain DEI subsidiaries’ obligations for equity capital contributions and energy generation associated with Fowler Ridge and NedPower.

Additionally, as of December 31, 20102012 Dominion had purchased $87$163 million of surety bonds and authorized the issuance of standby letters of credit by financial institutions of $136$26 million to facilitate commercial transactions by its subsidiaries with third parties. Under the terms of surety bonds, Dominion is obligated to indemnify the respective surety bond company for any amounts paid.

VIRGINIA POWER

As of December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power had issued $16$14 million of guarantees primarily to support tax-exempt debt issued through conduits. Virginia Power had also purchased $39$67 million of surety bonds for various purposes, including providing workers’ compensation coverage, and authorized the issuance of standby letters of credit by financial institutions of $91$2 million to facilitate commercial transactions by its subsidiaries with third parties. Under the terms of surety bonds, Virginia Power is obligated to indemnify the respective surety bond company for any amounts paid.

Indemnifications

As part of commercial contract negotiations in the normal course of business, Dominion and Virginia Power may sometimes agree

116


to make payments to compensate or indemnify other parties for possible future unfavorable financial consequences resulting from specified events. The specified events may involve an adverse judgment in a lawsuit or the imposition of additional taxes due to a change in tax law or interpretation of the tax law. Dominion and Virginia Power are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments under these contracts because events that would obligate them have not yet occurred or, if any such event has occurred, they have not been notified of its occurrence. However, at December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion and Virginia Power believe future payments, if any, that could ultimately become payable under these contract provisions, would not have a material impact on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Workforce Reduction Program

In the first quarter of 2010, Dominion and Virginia Power announced a workforce reduction program that reduced their total workforces by approximately 9% and 11%, respectively, during 2010. The goal of the workforce reduction program was to reduce operations and maintenance expense growth and further improve the efficiency of the Companies. In the first quarter of 2010, Dominion recorded a $338 million ($206 million after-tax) charge, including $202 million ($123 million after-tax) at Virginia Power, primarily reflected in other operations and maintenance expense in their Consolidated Statements of Income due to severance pay and other benefits related to the workforce reduction program. During 2010, Dominion and Virginia Power paid $109 million and $104 million, respectively, of costs related to the program. The terms of the workforce reduction program were consistent with the Companies’ existing severance plan.

 

 

NOTE 24.23. CREDIT RISK

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if counterparties fail to perform their contractual obligations. In order to minimize overall credit risk, credit policies are maintained, including the evaluation of counterparty financial condition, collateral requirements and the use of standardized agreements that facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty. In addition, counterparties may make available collateral, including letters of credit or cash held as margin deposits, as a result of exceeding agreed-upon credit limits, or may be required to prepay the transaction.

Dominion and Virginia Power maintain a provision for credit losses based on factors surrounding the credit risk of their customers, historical trends and other information. Management believes, based on credit policies and the December 31, 20102012 provision for credit losses, that it is unlikely that a material adverse effect on financial position, results of operations or cash flows would occur as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

GENERAL

DOMINION

As a diversified energy company, Dominion transacts primarily with major companies in the energy industry and with commercialcommer-

117


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

cial and residential energy consumers. These transactions principally occur in the Northeast, mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions of the U.S. and Texas. Dominion does not believe that this geo-

graphicgeographic concentration contributes significantly to its overall exposure to credit risk. In addition, as a result of its large and diverse customer base, Dominion is not exposed to a significant concentration of credit risk for receivables arising from electric and gas utility operations.

Dominion’s exposure to credit risk is concentrated primarily within its energy marketing and price risk management activities, as Dominion transacts with a smaller, less diverse group of counterparties and transactions may involve large notional volumes and potentially volatile commodity prices. Energy marketing and price risk management activities include trading of energy-related commodities, marketing of merchant generation output, structured transactions and the use of financial contracts for enterprise-wide hedging purposes. Gross credit exposure for each counterparty is calculated as outstanding receivables plus any unrealized on- or off-balance sheet exposure, taking into account contractual netting rights. Gross credit exposure is calculated prior to the application of collateral. At December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion’s gross credit exposure totaled $620 million. After the application of collateral, credit exposure is reduced to $591$512 million. Of this amount, investment grade counterparties, including those internally rated, represented 85%77%. One counterparty exposure represents 10%11% of Dominion’s total exposure and is a large financial institution rated investment grade.

VIRGINIA POWER

Virginia Power sells electricity and provides distribution and transmission services to customers in Virginia and northeastern North Carolina. Management believes that this geographic concentration risk is mitigated by the diversity of Virginia Power’s customer base, which includes residential, commercial and industrial customers, as well as rural electric cooperatives and municipalities. Credit risk associated with trade accounts receivable from energy consumers is limited due to the large number of customers. Virginia Power’s exposure to potential concentrations of credit risk results primarily from sales to wholesale customers. Virginia Power’s gross credit exposure for each counterparty is calculated as outstanding receivables plus any unrealized on- or off-balance sheet exposure, taking into account contractual netting rights. Gross credit exposure is calculated prior to the application of collateral. At December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power’s exposure to potential concentrations of credit risk was not considered material.

CREDIT-R-ELATEDRELATED CONTINGENT PROVISIONS

The majority of Dominion’s derivative instruments contain credit-related contingent provisions. These provisions require Dominion to provide collateral upon the occurrence of specific events, primarily a credit downgrade. If the credit-related contingent features underlying these instruments that are in a liability position and not fully collateralized with cash were fully triggered as of December 31, 20102012 and 2009,2011, Dominion would have been required to post an additional $88$110 million and $36$88 million, respectively, of collateral to its counterparties. The collateral that would be required to be posted includes the impacts of any offsetting asset positions and any amounts already posted for derivatives, non-derivative contracts and derivatives elected under the normal purchases and normal sales exception, per contractual

terms. Dominion had posted $54$4 million in collateral at December 31, 2012 and $110 million in collateral, including $19$4 million of letters of credit at December 31, 2010 and $62

117


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

million in collateral, including $48 million of letters of credit at December 31, 2009,2011, related to derivatives with credit-related contingent provisions that are in a liability position and not fully collateralized with cash. The collateral posted includes any amounts paid related to non-derivative contracts and derivatives elected under the normal purchases and normal sales exception, per contractual terms. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-related contingent provisions that are in a liability position and not fully collateralized with cash as of December 31, 20102012 and 20092011 was $210$163 million and $181$259 million, respectively, which does not include the impact of any offsetting asset positions. Credit-related contingent provisions for Virginia Power were not material as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. See Note 87 for further information about derivative instruments.

 

 

NOTE 25. DOMINION CAPITAL, INC.

At December 31, 2007, DCI held an investment in the subordinated notes of a third-party CDO entity. The CDO entity’s primary focus is the purchase and origination of middle market senior secured first and second lien commercial and industrial loans in both the primary and secondary loan markets. Dominion concluded previously that the CDO entity was a VIE and that DCI was the primary beneficiary of the CDO entity and therefore Dominion consolidated the CDO entity at December 31, 2007.

In March 2008, Dominion reached an agreement to sell its remaining interest in the subordinated notes to a third party, effectively eliminating the variability of its interest, and therefore deconsolidated the CDO entity as of March 31, 2008 and recognized impairment losses of $62 million ($38 million after-tax), which were recorded in other operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income. In connection with the sale of the subordinated notes, in April 2008, Dominion received proceeds of $54 million, including accrued interest. This sale concluded Dominion’s efforts to divest of DCI, since its remaining assets are aligned with Dominion’s core business.

NOTE 26.24. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Virginia Power engages in related-party transactions primarily with other Dominion subsidiaries (affiliates). Virginia Power’s receivable and payable balances with affiliates are settled based on contractual terms or on a monthly basis, depending on the nature of the underlying transactions. Virginia Power is included in Dominion’s consolidated federal income tax return and participates in certain Dominion benefit plans. A discussion of significant related partyrelated-party transactions follows.

Transactions with Affiliates

Virginia Power transacts with affiliates for certain quantities of natural gas and other commodities in the ordinary course of business. Virginia Power also enters into certain commodity derivative contracts with affiliates. Virginia Power uses these contracts, which are principally comprised of commodity swaps, and options, to manage commodity price risks associated with purchases of natural gas.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, Virginia Power’s derivative liabilities with affiliates were not material.

DRS providesand other affiliates provide accounting, legal, finance and certain administrative and technical services to Virginia Power. In addition, Virginia Power provides certain services to affiliates, including charges for facilities and equipment usage. Presented below are significant transactions with DRS and other affiliates:

 

Year Ended December 31,  2010   2009   2008   2012   2011   2010 
(millions)                        

Commodity purchases from affiliates

  $373    $327    $527    $368    $376    $373  

Services provided by affiliates

   469     420     399     399     393     469  

Services provided to affiliates

   19     21     19  

During 2009,In the fourth quarter of 2011, a subsidiary of Virginia Power purchased turbinesnuclear fuel-related inventory from an affiliate for $58$39 million to be usedfor future use at its nuclear generation stations.

Virginia Power has borrowed funds from Dominion under short-term borrowing arrangements. There were $243 million in short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion as of December 31, 2012. There were no short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion as of December 31, 2011. Virginia

118


Power’s outstanding borrowings, net of repayments, under the Bear Garden power station, currently under construction.

The following table presentsDominion money pool for its nonregulated subsidiaries totaled $192 million and $187 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest charges related to Virginia Power’s borrowings from Dominion under short-term arrangements:

At December 31,  2010   2009 
(millions)        

Outstanding borrowings, net of repayments, under the Dominion money pool for Virginia Power’s nonregulated subsidiaries

  $24    $2  

Short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion

   79       

Virginia Power incurred interest charges related to its borrowings from Dominion of $1 million, $5 million,were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and $10 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.2010.

In 2010 2009 and 2008, Virginia Power issued 33,013 31,877 and 11,786 shares of its common stock to Dominion as settlement offor approximately $1 billion, $1 billion and $350 millionfor the purpose of retiring short-term demand note borrowings from Dominion, respectively.Dominion. There were no such issuances of common stock in 2011 and 2012.

 

 

NOTE 27.25. OPERATING SEGMENTS

Dominion and Virginia Power are organized primarily on the basis of products and services sold in the U.S. A description of the operations included in the Companies’ primary operating segments is as follows:

 

Primary Operating

Segment

 Description of Operations Dominion 

Virginia

Power

DVP

 

Regulated electric distribution

 X X
 

Regulated electric transmission

 X X
  

Nonregulated retail energy marketing (electric and gas)

 X  

Dominion Generation

 

Regulated electric fleet

 X X
  

Merchant electric fleet

 X  

Dominion Energy

 

Gas transmission and storage

 X 
 

Gas distribution and storage

 X 
 

LNG import and storage

 X 
 

Producer services

 X
  

In addition to the operating segments above, the Companies also report a Corporate and Other segment.

The Corporate and Other Segment of Virginia Power primarily includes specific items attributable to its operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

118


The Corporate and Other Segment of Dominion includes its corporate, service company and other functions (including unallocated debt) and the net impact of Peoples and certain DCIthe operations that are expected to be or are currently discontinued, which are discussed in Notes 4 and 25, respectively.Note 3. In addition, Corporate and Other includes specific items attributable to Dominion’s operating segments that are not included in profit measures evaluated by executive management in assessing the segments’ performance or allocating resources among the segments.

DOMINION

In 2010,2012, Dominion reported after-tax net benefitsexpense of $837$1.4 billion for specific items in the Corporate and Other segment, with $1.4 billion of these net expenses attributable to its operating segments.

The net expenses for specific items in 2012 primarily related to the impact of the following items:

Ÿ

A $1.7 billion ($1.1 billion after-tax) net loss from operations, including an impairment charge, of Brayton Point, Kincaid and Elwood, attributable to Dominion Generation. Dominion announced its intention to pursue the sale of these two merchant power stations and equity method investment in the third quarter of 2012;

Ÿ

A $467 million ($303 million after-tax) net loss, including impairment charges, primarily resulting from management’s decision to cease operations and begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013, attributable to Dominion Generation;

Ÿ

An $87 million ($53 million after-tax) charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms, attributable to DVP; and

Ÿ

A $49 million ($22 million after-tax) loss from discontinued operations of State Line and Salem Harbor which were sold in 2012, attributable to Dominion Generation.

In 2011, Dominion reported after-tax net expense of $311 million for specific items in the Corporate and Other segment, with $1$340 million of these net expenses attributable to its operating segments.

The net expenses for specific items in 2011 primarily related to the impact of the following items:

Ÿ

A $228 million ($139 million after-tax) charge reflecting plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain utility coal-fired generating units, attributable to Dominion Generation;

Ÿ

A $96 million ($59 million after-tax) charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene, primarily attributable to DVP;

Ÿ

A $66 million ($39 million after-tax) loss from the operations of Kewaunee, attributable to Dominion Generation;

Ÿ

A $57 million ($34 million after-tax) charge related to the impairment of SO2 emissions allowances not expected to be consumed due to CSAPR, attributable to Dominion Generation; and

Ÿ

A $34 million ($25 million after-tax) loss from discontinued operations of State Line and Salem Harbor which were sold in 2012, attributable to Dominion Generation.

In 2010, Dominion reported after-tax net benefits of $865 million for specific items in the Corporate and Other segment, with $1.0 billion of these net benefits attributable to its operating segments.

The net benefits for specific items in 2010 primarily related to the impact of the following items:

Ÿ 

A $2.5 billion ($1.4 billion after-tax) benefit resulting from the gain on the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&P operations net of charges related to the divestiture, attributable to Dominion Energy; partially offset by

Ÿ 

A $338$331 million ($206202 million after-tax) charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, attributable to:

 Ÿ 

DVP ($67 million after-tax);

 Ÿ 

Dominion Energy ($24 million after-tax); and

 Ÿ 

Dominion Generation ($115111 million after-tax);

Ÿ

A $158 million ($103 million after-tax) loss from the discontinued operations of State Line and Salem Harbor; and

Ÿ 

A $134 million ($155 million after-tax) loss from the discontinued operations of Peoples primarily reflecting a net loss on the sale, attributable to the Corporate and Other segment; and

Ÿ

A $194 million ($127 million after-tax) impairment charge at certain merchant generation power stations, attributable to Dominion Generation.

In 2009, Dominion reported after-tax net expenses of $655 million for specific items in the Corporate and Other segment, with $688 million of these net expenses attributable to its operating segments.

The net expenses for specific items in 2009 primarily related to the impact of the following items:

Ÿ

A $455 million ($281 million after-tax) ceiling test impairment charge related to the carrying value of Dominion’s E&P properties, attributable to Dominion Energy; and

Ÿ

A $712 million ($435 million after-tax) charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings, attributable to:

Ÿ

Dominion Generation ($257 million after-tax); and

Ÿ

DVP ($178 million after-tax).

In 2008, Dominion reported after-tax net expenses of $3 million for specific items in the Corporate and Other segment, with $134 million of these net expenses attributable to its operating segments.

The net expenses for specific items in 2008 primarily related to the impact of the following items:

Ÿ

$180 million ($109 million after-tax) of impairment charges reflecting other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of securities held as investments in nuclear decommissioning trusts as of December 31, 2008, attributable to Dominion Generation;

Ÿ

A $62 million ($38 million after-tax) impairment charge related to the disposition of certain DCI investments. attributable to the Corporate and Other segment;

Ÿ

A $42 million ($26 million after-tax) charge related to post-closing adjustments to the gain on the sale of the non-Appalachian E&P business, attributable to the Corporate and Other segment;

Ÿ

$39 million ($24 million after-tax) of impairment charges related to non-refundable deposits for certain generation-related vendor contracts, attributable to Dominion Generation; and

Ÿ

A $119 million ($192 million after-tax) benefit reflecting the discontinued operations of Peoples, attributable to the Corporate and Other segment.

 

 

119

119

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

 

 

The following table presents segment information pertaining to Dominion’s operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,  DVP   Dominion
Generation
   Dominion
Energy
   Corporate and
Other
 Adjustments &
Eliminations
 Consolidated
Total
   DVP   Dominion
Generation(1)
   Dominion
Energy
   Corporate and
Other(1)
 Adjustments &
Eliminations
 Consolidated
Total
 
(millions)                                        

2012

          

Total revenue from external customers

  $3,385    $6,517    $1,813    $307   $1,071   $13,093  

Intersegment revenue

   112     333     930     608    (1,983    

Total operating revenue

   3,497     6,850     2,743     915    (912  13,093  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   402     500     216     68        1,186  

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

        3     23     (1      25  

Interest income

   9     57     30     71    (106  61  

Interest and related charges

   187     208     47     546    (106  882  

Income taxes

   351     479     352     (1,036      146  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                  (22      (22

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

   559     874     551     (1,682      302  

Investment in equity method investees

   1     414     141     2        558  

Capital expenditures

   1,158     1,615     1,350     22        4,145  

Total assets (billions)

   12.1     21.2     11.2     12.6    (10.3  46.8  

2011

          

Total revenue from external customers

  $3,663    $7,080    $2,044    $55   $1,303   $14,145  

Intersegment revenue

   173     355     1,077     596    (2,201    

Total operating revenue

   3,836     7,435     3,121     651    (898  14,145  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   374     457     207     28        1,066  

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

        3     23     9        35  

Interest income

   22     54     27     70    (106  67  

Interest and related charges

   185     217     57     514    (106  867  

Income taxes

   318     583     323     (470      754  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                  (25      (25

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

   501     968     521     (582      1,408  

Investment in equity method investees

   8     415     104     26        553  

Capital expenditures

   1,091     1,593     907     61        3,652  

Total assets (billions)

   11.5     22.1     10.6     11.4    (10.0  45.6  

2010

                    

Total revenue from external customers

  $3,613    $8,005    $2,335    $19   $1,225   $15,197    $3,613    $7,735    $2,335    $19   $1,225   $14,927  

Intersegment revenue

   207     413     1,166     750    (2,536       207     413     1,166     750    (2,536    

Total operating revenue

   3,820     8,418     3,501     769    (1,311  15,197     3,820     8,148     3,501     769    (1,311  14,927  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   353     462     210     30        1,055     353     443     210     29        1,035  

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

        11     21     10        42          11     21     10        42  

Interest income

   12     45     12     92    (90  71     12     45     12     92    (90  71  

Interest and related charges

   158     185     85     494    (90  832     158     179     85     494    (90  826  

Income taxes

   277     771     302     707        2,057     277     756     302     777        2,112  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                  (155      (155                  (258      (258

Net income attributable to Dominion

   448     1,291     475     594        2,808     448     1,263     475     622        2,808  

Investment in equity method investees

   8     426     106     31        571  

Capital expenditures

   1,038     1,742     613     29        3,422     1,038     1,742     613     29        3,422  

Total assets (billions)

   10.8     20.4     9.7     10.8    (8.9  42.8  

2009

          

Total revenue from external customers

  $3,107    $8,390    $2,604    $(472 $1,169   $14,798  

Intersegment revenue

   174     361     1,206     711    (2,452    

Total operating revenue

   3,281     8,751     3,810     239    (1,283  14,798  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   341     492     258     47        1,138  

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

        8     21     13        42  

Interest income

   13     49     16     129    (118  89  

Interest and related charges

   159     201     113     534    (118  889  

Income taxes

   233     694     319     (650      596  

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

                  26        26  

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

   384     1,281     517     (895      1,287  

Investment in equity method investees

   9     439     102     45        595  

Capital expenditures

   841     2,140     737     119        3,837  

Total assets (billions)

   9.8     18.7     10.1     12.6    (8.6  42.6  

2008

          

Total revenue from external customers

  $2,977    $8,569    $2,641    $(4 $1,712   $15,895  

Intersegment revenue

   134     102     1,829     740    (2,805    

Total operating revenue

   3,111     8,671     4,470     736    (1,093  15,895  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   312     423     284     17    (2  1,034  

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

        27     17     8        52  

Interest income

   22     78     35     136    (167  104  

Interest and related charges

   149     230     141     476    (167  829  

Income taxes

   232     688     283     (250      953  

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

                  190        190  

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

   380     1,227     470     (243      1,834  

Capital expenditures

   797     1,665     940     152        3,554  

(1)Segment information has been recast to reflect Salem Harbor and State Line as discontinued operations, as discussed in Note 3.

At December 31, 2010, 2009,2012, 2011, and 2008,2010, none of Dominion’s long-lived assets and no significant percentage of its operating revenues were associated with international operations.

 

120    

 


 

 

VIRGINIA POWER

The majority of Virginia Power’s revenue is provided through tariff rates. Generally, such revenue is allocated for management reporting based on an unbundled rate methodology among Virginia Power’s DVP and Dominion Generation segments.

In 2012, Virginia Power reported after-tax net expenses of $51 million for specific items attributable to its operating segments in the Corporate and Other segment.

The net expenses for specific items in 2012 primarily related to the impact of the following:

Ÿ

An $87 million ($53 million after-tax) charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by severe storms, attributable to DVP.

In 2011, Virginia Power reported after-tax net expenses of $268 million for specific items attributable to its operating segments in the Corporate and Other segment.

The net expenses for specific items in 2011 primarily related to the impact of the following:

Ÿ

A $228 million ($139 million after-tax) charge reflecting plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the anticipated retirement of certain coal-fired generating units, attributable to Dominion Generation;

Ÿ

A $96 million ($59 million after-tax) charge reflecting restoration costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Irene, primarily attributable to DVP; and

Ÿ

A $43 million ($26 million after-tax) charge related to the impairment of SO2 emissions allowances not expected to be consumed due to CSAPR, attributable to Dominion Generation.

In 2010, Virginia Power reported after-tax net expenses of $153 million for specific items attributable to its operating segments in the Corporate and Other segment.

The net expenses for specific items in 2010 primarily related to the impact of the following:

Ÿ 

A $202 million ($123 million after-tax) charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program, attributable to:

 Ÿ 

DVP ($63 million after-tax); and

 Ÿ 

Dominion Generation ($60 million after-tax).

In 2009, Virginia Power reported after-tax net expenses of $430 million for specific items attributable to its operating segments in the Corporate and Other segment. The net expenses primarily related to a $700 million ($427 million after-tax) charge in connection with the settlement of the 2009 base rate case proceedings, attributable to Dominion Generation ($257 million after-tax) and DVP ($170 million after-tax).

In 2008, Virginia Power’s Corporate and Other segment included $23 million of net after-tax expenses attributable to its Dominion Generation segment. The net expenses in 2008 primarily related to impairment charges of $18 million ($11 million after-tax) related to non-refundable deposits for certain generation-related vendor contracts and $8 million ($5 million after-tax) reflecting other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of securities held as investments in nuclear decommissioning trusts.

 

 

The following table presents segment information pertaining to Virginia Power’s operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,  DVP   Dominion
Generation
   Corporate and
Other
 Adjustments &
Eliminations
 Consolidated
Total
   DVP   Dominion
Generation
   Corporate and
Other
 Adjustments &
Eliminations
 Consolidated
Total
 
(millions)                                

2012

        

Operating revenue

  $1,847    $5,379    $   $   $7,226  

Depreciation and amortization

   392     390             782  

Interest income

   1     7             8  

Interest and related charges

   186     199             385  

Income taxes

   277     403     (27      653  

Net income (loss)

   448     653     (51      1,050  

Capital expenditures

   1,142     1,146             2,288  

Total assets (billions)

   11.4     14.8         (1.4  24.8  

2011

        

Operating revenue

  $1,793    $5,546    $(93 $   $7,246  

Depreciation and amortization

   368     350             718  

Interest income

   10     8             18  

Interest and related charges

   182     199     (50      331  

Income taxes

   265     447     (172      540  

Net income (loss)

   426     664     (268      822  

Capital expenditures

   1,081     1,009             2,090  

Total assets (billions)

   10.7     14.3         (1.5  23.5  

2010

                

Operating revenue

  $1,680    $5,546    $(7 $   $7,219    $1,680    $5,546    $(7 $   $7,219  

Depreciation and amortization

   344     327             671     344     327             671  

Interest income

   11     4             15     11     4             15  

Interest and related charges

   158     189             347     158     189             347  

Income taxes

   228     385     (71      542     228     385     (71      542  

Net income (loss)

   377     630     (155      852     377     630     (155      852  

Capital expenditures

   1,035     1,199             2,234     1,035     1,199             2,234  

Total assets (billions)

   9.9     13.8         (1.4  22.3  

2009

        

Operating revenue

  $1,465    $5,560    $(441 $   $6,584  

Depreciation and amortization

   320     320     1        641  

Interest income

   11     6             17  

Interest and related charges

   158     191             349  

Income taxes

   183     241     (277      147  

Net income (loss)

   313     475     (432      356  

Capital expenditures

   839     1,649             2,488  

Total assets (billions)

   9.0     12.3         (1.2  20.1  

2008

        

Operating revenue

  $1,439    $5,478    $17   $   $6,934  

Depreciation and amortization

   310     298             608  

Interest income

   15     9         (3  21  

Interest and related charges

   144     167     1    (3  309  

Income taxes

   182     331     (13      500  

Net income (loss)

   307     583     (26      864  

Capital expenditures

   792     1,245             2,037  

 

    121

 


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

 

 

 

NOTE 28.26. QUARTERLY FINANCIALAND COMMON STOCK DATA (UNAUDITED)

A summary of Dominion’s and Virginia Power’s quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20102012 and 20092011 follows. Amounts reflect all adjustments necessary in the opinion of management for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. Results for interim periods may fluctuate as a result of weather conditions, changes in rates and other factors.

DOMINION

 

    First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
  Full Year 
(millions, except
per share
amounts)
                  

2010

        

Operating revenue

  $4,168   $3,333    $3,950    $3,746   $15,197  

Income from operations

   734    3,110     1,119     737    5,700  

Income from continuing operations(1)

   323    1,759     575     306    2,963  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

   (149  2          (8  (155

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   178    1,765     579     303    2,825  

Net income attributable to Dominion

   174    1,761     575     298    2,808  

Basic EPS:

        

Income from continuing operations(1)

   0.54    2.98     0.98     0.53    5.03  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

   (0.25            (0.01  (0.26

Net income attributable to Dominion

   0.29    2.98     0.98     0.52    4.77  

Diluted EPS:

        

Income from continuing operations(1)

   0.54    2.98     0.98     0.52    5.02  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

   (0.25            (0.01  (0.26

Net income attributable to Dominion

   0.29    2.98     0.98     0.51    4.76  

Dividends paid per share

   0.4575    0.4575     0.4575     0.4575    1.83  

Common stock prices (intraday high-low)

  $
 
41.61 -
36.12
  
  
 $
 
42.56 -
38.05
  
  
  $
 
44.94
38.59
 
  
  $
 
45.12 -
41.13
  
  
 $
 
45.12 -
36.12
  
  
   

First

Quarter(2)

  

Second

Quarter

  

Third

Quarter

  

Fourth

Quarter

  Full Year 
(millions, except per
share amounts)
               
2012               

Operating revenue

 $3,462   $3,053   $3,411   $3,167   $13,093  

Income (loss) from operations

  913    617    518    (892  1,156  

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests

  501    265    215    (652  329  

Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)

  493    276    214    (659  324  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

  1    (18  (5      (22

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

  494    258    209    (659  302  

Basic EPS:

     

Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)

  0.86    0.48    0.37    (1.15  0.57  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

      (0.03  (0.01      (0.04

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

  0.86    0.45    0.36    (1.15  0.53  

Diluted EPS:

     

Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)

  0.86    0.48    0.37    (1.15  0.57  

Loss from discontinued operations(1)

      (0.03  (0.01      (0.04

Net income (loss) attributable to Dominion

  0.86    0.45    0.36    (1.15  0.53  

Dividends declared per share

  0.5275    0.5275    0.5275    0.5275    2.11  

Common stock prices (intraday high-low)

 $
 
53.68 -
48.87
  
  
 $
 
54.69 -
49.87
  
  
 $
 
55.62 -
52.15
  
  
 $
 
53.89 -
48.94
  
  
 $
 
55.62 -
48.87
  
  
  First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Full Year  

First

Quarter

 

Second

Quarter

 

Third

Quarter

 

Fourth

Quarter

 Full Year 
(millions, except
per share
amounts)
                         

2009

       

2011(2)

     

Operating revenue

  $4,586    $3,406   $3,630   $3,176   $14,798   $3,983   $3,288   $3,745   $3,129   $14,145  

Income from operations

   664     889    1,088    (72  2,569    993    733    828    340    2,894  

Income from continuing operations(1)

   239     469    635    (82  1,261  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

   9     (15  (41  73    26  

Net income including noncontrolling interests

   252     458    598    (4  1,304    483    340    396    207    1,426  

Net income attributable to Dominion

   248     454    594    (9  1,287  

Basic and Diluted EPS:

       

Income from continuing operations(1)

   0.41     0.79    1.07    (0.13  2.13    504    341    388    200    1,433  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

   0.01     (0.03  (0.07  0.12    0.04    (25  (5  4    1    (25

Net income attributable to Dominion

   0.42     0.76    1.00    (0.01  2.17    479    336    392    201    1,408  

Dividends paid per share

   0.4375     0.4375    0.4375    0.4375    1.75  

Basic EPS:

     

Income from continuing operations(1)

  0.87    0.59    0.68    0.35    2.50  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

  (0.04  (0.01  0.01        (0.04

Net income attributable to Dominion

  0.83    0.58    0.69    0.35    2.46  

Diluted EPS:

     

Income from continuing operations(1)

  0.86    0.59    0.68    0.35    2.49  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations(1)

  (0.04  (0.01  0.01        (0.04

Net income attributable to Dominion

  0.82    0.58    0.69    0.35    2.45  

Dividends declared per share

  0.4925    0.4925    0.4925    0.4925    1.97  

Common stock prices (intraday high-low)

  $
 
37.18 -
27.15
  
  
  $
 
33.93 -
28.70
  
  
 $
 
34.84 -
32.10
  
  
 $
 
39.79 -
33.15
  
  
 $
 
39.79 -
27.15
  
  
 $
 
46.56 -
42.06
  
  
 $
 
48.55 -
43.27
  
  
 $
 
51.44 -
44.50
  
  
 $
 
53.59 -
48.21
  
  
 $
 
53.59 -
42.06
  
  

 

(1)Amounts attributable to Dominion’s common shareholders.
(2)Revenue and income amounts have been recast to reflect Salem Harbor and State Line as discontinued operations, as discussed in Note 3.

Dominion’s 20102012 results include the impact of the following significant items:

Ÿ 

FirstFourth quarter results include a $206 million$1.0 billion after-tax impairment charge primarily reflecting severance payto write down Brayton Point’s and other benefits relatedKincaid’s long-lived assets to a workforce reduction program and a $149 million after-tax loss from the discontinued operations of Peoples primarily reflecting a net loss on the sale.their estimated fair value.

Ÿ 

SecondThird quarter results include a $1.4 billion$281 million after-tax benefitnet loss, including impairment charges, primarily resulting from the gain on the sale of substantially all of Dominion’s Appalachian E&Pmanagement’s decision to cease operations net of charges related to the divestiture and a $95 million after-tax impairment charge at State Line to reflect the estimated fair value of the power station.begin decommissioning Kewaunee in 2013.

Dominion’s 20092011 results include the impact of the following significant items:item:

Ÿ 

FirstFourth quarter results include a $272$139 million after-tax ceiling impairment charge relatedreflecting plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in future periods due to the carrying valueanticipated retirement of its E&P properties and a $50 million after-tax net loss on investments held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds.certain utility coal-fired generating units.

 

 

122    

 


 

 

Ÿ

Second quarter results include a $62 million after-tax reduction in other operations and maintenance expense due to a downward revision in the nuclear decommissioning ARO for a power station unit that is no longer in service.

Ÿ

Third quarter results include a $34 million after-tax net gain on investments held in nuclear decommissioning trust funds.

Ÿ

Fourth quarter results include a $435 million after-tax charge in connection with the settlement of Virginia Power’s 2009 base rate case proceedings.

VIRGINIA POWER

Virginia Power’s quarterly results of operations were as follows:

 

  First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
 Year   First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Year 
(millions)                                      

2010

         

2012

          

Operating revenue

  $1,739    $1,711    $2,111    $1,658   $7,219    $1,754    $1,756    $2,086    $1,630    $7,226  

Income from operations

   254     479     673     235    1,641     468     361     746     417     1,992  

Net income

   95     267     380     110    852     243     172     415     220     1,050  

Balance available for common stock

   91     263     376     105    835     239     168     411     216     1,034  

2009

         

2011

          

Operating revenue

  $1,859    $1,675    $1,938    $1,112   $6,584    $1,757    $1,757    $2,177    $1,555    $7,246  

Income (loss) from operations

   402     299     554     (507  748  

Net income (loss)

   204     149     315     (312  356  

Income from operations

   511     471     568     55     1,605  

Net income

   278     241     297     6     822  

Balance available for common stock

   200     145     311     (317  339     274     237     293     1     805  

Virginia Power’s 20102012 results include the impact of the following significant item:

Ÿ 

FirstSecond quarter results include a $123$42 million after-tax charge primarily reflecting severance pay and other benefits related to a workforce reduction program.restoration costs associated with damage caused by late June summer storms.

Virginia Power’s 20092011 results include the impact of the following significant item:

Ÿ 

Fourth quarter results include a $427$139 million after-tax charge reflecting plant balances that are not expected to be recovered in connection withfuture periods due to the settlementanticipated retirement of its 2009 base rate case proceedings.certain coal-fired power stations.

 

 

123

123

 


 

 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

DOMINION

Senior management, including Dominion’s CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of Dominion’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation process, Dominion’s CEO and CFO have concluded that Dominion’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORTON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Dominion Resources, Inc. (Dominion) understands and accepts responsibility for Dominion’s financial statements and related disclosures and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (internal control). Dominion continuously strives to identify opportunities to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of internal control, just as Dominion does throughout all aspects of its business.

Dominion maintains a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance, at a reasonable cost, that its assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with established procedures. This system includes written policies, an organizational structure designed to ensure appropriate segregation of responsibilities, careful selection and training of qualified personnel and internal audits.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Dominion, composed entirely of independent directors, meets periodically with the independent registered public accounting firm, the internal auditors and management to discuss auditing, internal control, and financial reporting matters of Dominion and to ensure that each is properly discharging its responsibilities. Both the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors periodically meet alone with the Audit Committee and have free access to the Committee at any time.

SEC rules implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require Dominion’s 20102012 Annual Report to contain a management’s report and a report of the independent registered public accounting firm regarding the effectiveness of internal control. As a basis for the report, Dominion tested and evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls. Based on its assessment as of December 31, 2010,2012, Dominion makes the following assertion:assertions:

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting of Dominion.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management evaluated Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.2012. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, Managementmanagement believes that Dominion maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.2012.

Dominion’s independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to express an opinion on Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report which is included herein.

February 25, 201127, 2013

 

 

124    

 


 

 

REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Dominion Resources, Inc.

Richmond, Virginia

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Dominion Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Dominion”) as of December 31, 2010,2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Dominion’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Dominion’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s boardBoard of directors,Directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes

in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Dominion maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20102012 of Dominion and our report dated February 25, 2011,27, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Richmond, Virginia

February 25, 201127, 2013

 

 

125

125

 


 

 

VIRGINIA POWER

Senior management, including Virginia Power’s CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of Virginia Power’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation process, Virginia Power’s CEO and CFO have concluded that Virginia Power’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in Virginia Power’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Virginia Power’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORTON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Virginia Electric and Power Company (Virginia Power) understands and accepts responsibility for Virginia Power’s financial statements and related disclosures and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (internal control). Virginia Power continuously strives to identify opportunities to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of internal control, just as it does throughout all aspects of its business.

Virginia Power maintains a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance, at a reasonable cost, that its assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with established procedures. This system includes written policies, an organizational structure designed to ensure appropriate segregation of responsibilities, careful selection and training of qualified personnel and internal audits.

The Board of Directors also serves as Virginia Power’s Audit Committee and meets periodically with the independent registered public accounting firm, the internal auditors and management to discuss Virginia Power’s auditing, internal accounting control and financial reporting matters and to ensure that each is properly discharging its responsibilities.

SEC rules implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act require Virginia Power’s 20102012 Annual Report to contain a management’s report regarding the effectiveness of internal control. As a basis for the report, Virginia Power tested and evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls. Based on the assessment as of December 31, 2010,2012, Virginia Power makes the following assertion:assertions:

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting of Virginia Power.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management evaluated Virginia Power’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.2012. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described inInternal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, Managementmanagement believes that Virginia Power maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.2012.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of Virginia Power’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by Virginia Power’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to a permanent exemption under the Dodd-Frank Act.

February 25, 201127, 2013

 

 

126    

 


 

 

Item 9B. Other Information

None.Explanatory Note: The following information is furnished in this Form 10-K in lieu of being furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 in a Form 8-K. The date of the events reported below wasFebruary 28, 2013.

On January 31, 2013, Dominion issued its 4th Quarter 2012 Earnings Release Kit reporting unaudited earnings determined in accordance with GAAP for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012, and a fourth quarter impairment charge related to Brayton Point. On February 28, 2013, Dominion issued a revised 4th Quarter 2012 Earnings Release Kit to reflect a reduction in reported earnings for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012. The reduction relates to an additional impairment charge associated with Dominion’s merchant power stations being marketed for sale. For more information on the impairment charge, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference. The revised Earnings Release Kit reflecting the reduction in earnings and supplemental schedules are furnished with this Form 10-K as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively.

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

DOMINION

The following information for Dominion is incorporated by reference from the 2011Dominion 2013 Proxy Statement, File No. 001-08489, which will be filed on or around March 31, 2011 (the 2011 Proxy Statement):19, 2013:

Ÿ 

Information regarding the directors required by this item is found under the headingElection of Directors.

Ÿ 

Information regarding compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, required by this item is found under the headingSection 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.

Ÿ 

Information regarding Dominion’sthe Dominion Audit Committee Financial expert(s) required by this item is found under the headingsDirector Independence andCommittees and Meeting Attendance.

Ÿ 

Information regarding Dominion’sthe Dominion Audit Committee required by this item is found under the headingsThe Audit Committee Report andCommittees and Meeting Attendance.

Ÿ 

Information regarding Dominion’s Code of Ethics required by this item is found under the headingCorporate Governance and Board Matters.

The information concerning the executive officers of Dominion required by this item is included in Part I of this Form 10-K under the captionExecutive Officers of Dominion. Each executive officer of Dominion is elected annually.

VIRGINIA POWER

Information concerning directors of Virginia Power, each of whom is elected annually, is as follows:

 

Name and Age  

Principal Occupation and

Directorships in Public Corporations for Last Five Years(1)

  

Year First

Elected as

Director

Thomas F. Farrell II (56)(58)

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of Virginia Power from February 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dominion from April 2007 to date; President and CEO of Dominion from January 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and CEO of CNG from January 2006 to June 2007; Director of Dominion from March 2005 to April 2007.date. Mr. Farrell has served as a director of Altria Group, Inc. since 2008.

Mr. Farrell’s qualifications to serve as a director include his 1517 years of industry experience as well as his legal expertise, having served as General Counsel for Dominion and Virginia Power and as a practicing attorney with a private firm. He is a member of the boardschairman of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations and a member of the Board of Directors of the Edison Electric Institute through which he actively represents the interests of Dominion, Virginia Power and the energy sector. Mr. Farrell also has extensive community and public interest involvement and serves or has served on the boards of many non-profit and university foundations.

  1999

Mark F. McGettrick (53)(55)

  

Executive Vice President and CFO of Virginia Power and Dominion from June 2009 to date; President and COO—GenerationCOO-Generation of Virginia Power from February 2006 to May 2009; Executive Vice President of Dominion from April 2006 to May 2009.

Mr. McGettrick’s qualifications to serve as a director include his more than 30 years of power generation management and industry experience. He currently serves on the George Mason University board of visitors and business council and is on the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the Dominion Foundation. Mr. McGettrick also has community and public interest involvement and serves or has served on many non-profit foundations and boards.

  2009

Steven A. Rogers (49)(51)

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Virginia Power and Dominion from January 2013 to date; Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Dominion and President and Chief Administrative Officer of DRS from October 2007 to date; Senior Vice President and CAO of Virginia Power and Dominion from January 2007 to September 2007 and CNG from January 2007 to June 2007; Senior Vice President and Controller of Dominion and CNG from April 2006 to December 2006; Senior Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer of Virginia Power from April 2006 to December 2006; Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer of Virginia Power and Vice President and Controller of Dominion and CNG from June 2000 to April 2006.2012.

Mr. Rogers’Roger’s qualifications to serve as a director include his 1517 years of industry experience, prior work with Deloitte & Touche LLP and his former membership in the FASB’s Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Committee. Mr. Rogers also has community and public interest involvement and serves or has served on many non-profit foundations and boards.

  2007
(1)Any service listed for Dominion DRS and CNGDRS reflects service at a parent, subsidiary or affiliate. Virginia Power is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dominion. DRS is an affiliate of Virginia Power and is also a subsidiary of Dominion. CNG is a former subsidiary of Dominion that merged with and into Dominion.

 

    127

 


 

 

Executive Officers of Virginia Power

Information concerning the executive officers of Virginia Power, each of whom is elected annually, is as follows:

 

Name and Age  Business Experience Past Five Years(1)

Thomas F. Farrell II (56)(58)

  Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of Virginia Power from February 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dominion from April 2007 to date; President and CEO of Dominion from January 2006 to date; Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and CEO of CNG from January 2006 to June 2007; Director of Dominion from March 2005 to April 2007.date.

Mark F. McGettrick (53)(55)

  Executive Vice President and CFO of Virginia Power and Dominion from June 2009 to date; President and COO—GenerationCOO-Generation of Virginia Power from February 2006 to JuneMay 2009; Executive Vice President of Dominion from April 2006 to May 2009.

Paul D. Koonce (51)(53)

  President and COO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer-Energy Infrastructure Group of Dominion from February 2013 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from April 2006 to date; President and COO—Energy of Virginia Power from February 2006 to September 2007.2013.

David A. Christian (56)(58)

  President and COO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer-Dominion Generation Group of Dominion from February 2013 to date; Executive Vice President of Dominion from May 2011 to February 2013; President and CNO of Virginia Power from October 2007 to May 2009; Senior Vice President—Nuclear Operations and CNO of Virginia Power from April 2000 to September 2007.2009.

David A. Heacock (53)(55)

  President and CNO of Virginia Power from June 2009 to date; President and COO-DVP of Virginia Power and Senior Vice President of Dominion from June 2008 to May 2009; Senior Vice President—DVPPresident-DVP of Virginia Power from October 2007 to May 2008; Senior Vice President—Fossil & Hydro of Virginia Power from April 2005 to September 2007.2008.

Robert M. Blue (43)(45)

  Senior Vice President—Law,President-Law, Public Policy and Environment of Virginia Power Dominion and DRSDominion from January 2011 to date; Senior Vice President—PublicPresident-Public Policy and Environment of Dominion and DRS from February 2010 to December 2010; Senior Vice President—PublicPresident-Public Policy and Corporate Communications of Dominion and DRS from May 2008 to January 2010; Vice President—StatePresident-State and Federal Affairs of DRS from September 2006 to May 2008; Managing Director State Affairs and Corporate Policy of DRS from July 2005 to August 2006.2008.

Ashwini Sawhney (61)(63)

  Vice President—AccountingPresident-Accounting of Virginia Power from April 2006 to date; Vice President—AccountingPresident-Accounting and Controller (CAO) of Dominion from May 2010 to date; Vice President and Controller (CAO) of Dominion from July 2009 to May 2010; Vice President and Controller of Dominion from April 2007 to June 2009; Vice President—Accounting and Controller of Dominion from January 2007 to April 2007 and of CNG from January 2007 to June 2007; Vice President—Accounting of Dominion and CNG from April 2006 to December 2006; Assistant Corporate Controller of Dominion from June 2002 to April 2006; Assistant Corporate Controller of Virginia Power from January 1999 to April 2006.2009.

 

(1)Any service listed for Dominion DRS and CNGDRS reflects services at a parent, subsidiary or affiliate.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

To Virginia Power’s knowledge, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010,2012, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its executive officers and directors were satisfied.

Audit Committee Financial Experts

Virginia Power is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dominion. As permitted by SEC rules, its Board of Directors serves as Virginia Power’s Audit Committee and is comprised entirely of executive officers of Virginia Power or Dominion. Virginia Power’s Board of Directors has determined that Thomas F. Farrell II, Mark F. McGettrick and Steven A. Rogers are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC. As executive officers of Virginia Power and/or Dominion, Thomas F. Farrell II, Mark F. McGettrick and Steven A. Rogers arewere not deemed independent.

Code of Ethics

Virginia Power has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive, financial and accounting officers, as well as its employees. This Code of Ethics is the same as Dominion adopted and is available on the corporate governance section of Dominion’s website (www.dom.com). You may also request a copy of the Code of Ethics, free of charge, by writing or telephoning to: Corporate Secretary, 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219, Telephone (804) 819-2000. Any waivers or changes to Virginia Power’s Code of Ethics will be posted on the Dominion website.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

DOMINION

The following information about Dominion is contained in the 20112013 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference: the information regarding executive compensation contained under the headingsCompensation Discussion and Analysis andExecutive CompensationCompensation;; the information regarding Compensation Committee interlocks contained under the headingCompensation Committee InterlocksandInsider Participation;theCompensation, Governance and Nominating Committee Report; and the information regarding director compensation contained under the headingNon-Employee Director CompensationCompensation..

VIRGINIA POWER

COMPENSATION DCISCUSSIONANDOMMITTEE ARNALYSISEPORT

Virginia Power is a wholly-owned subsidiaryIn preparation for the filing of Dominion. Virginia Power’s Board is comprised of Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick and Rogers. Messrs. Farrell and McGettrick are not independent because they are executive officers of Virginia Power. Mr. Rogers is not deemed independent because of his employment with Dominion. Virginia Power’s Board believes that it is more appropriate for its compensation program to be managed under the direction of individuals who are independent and, therefore, Virginia Power does not have a compensation committee. Instead, Virginia Power’s Board dependsAnnual Report on the advice and recommendations ofForm 10-K, Dominion’s CGN Committee which is comprisedreviewed and discussed the following CD&A with management and has recommended to the Board of independent directors and which retainedDirectors of Virginia Power that the consulting firm of PM&P to adviseCD&A be included in Virginia Power’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the committee on compensationyear ended December 31, 2012.

Robert S. Jepson, Jr.,Chairman

William P. Barr

John W. Harris

Mark J. Kington

David A. Wollard

 

 

128    

 


 

 

matters.INTRODUCTION

Virginia Power is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dominion. Virginia Power’s Board is comprised of Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick and Rogers. As executive officers of Virginia Power and/or Dominion, Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick and Rogers were not independent. Because Virginia Power’s Board is not independent, there is not a separate compensation committee at the Virginia Power level. Instead, Virginia Power’s Board depends on the advice and recommendations of Dominion’s CGN Committee which is comprised of independent directors. Virginia Power’s Board approves all compensation paid to Virginia Power’s executive officers based on theDominion’s CGN Committee’sCommittee recommendations.

None of Virginia Power’s directors receive any compensation for services they provide as directors.directors of Virginia Power. No executive officer of Dominion or Virginia Power serves as a member of another compensation committee or on the Board of Directors of any company of which a member of Dominion’s CGN Committee, Dominion’s Board of Directors or Virginia Power’s Board of Directors serves as an executive officer.

Because the CGN Committee effectively administers one compensation program for all of Dominion, the following discussion and analysis is based on Dominion’s overall compensation program.

ICNTRODUCTIONOMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

This CD&A provides a detailed explanation of the objectives and principles that underlie Dominion’s executive compensation program, its elements and the way performance is measured, evaluated and rewarded. It also describes Dominion’s compensation decision-making process. Dominion’s executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance and playedplays an important role in the company’sDominion’s success in 2010 by linking a significant amount of compensation to the achievement of performance goals.

The program and processes generally apply to all of Dominion’s officers, but this discussion and analysis focuses primarily on compensation for the NEOs of Virginia Power. During 2010,2012, Virginia Power’s NEOs were:

Ÿ 

Thomas F. Farrell II, Chairman President and CEO

Ÿ 

Mark F. McGettrick, Executive Vice President and CFO

Ÿ 

Paul D. Koonce, President and COO—DVP

Ÿ 

David A. Christian, President and COO—Generation

Ÿ 

James F. Stutts, Senior Vice David A. Heacock,President and General Counsel(retired January 1, 2011)CNO

The CGN Committee determines the compensation payable to officers of Dominion and its wholly-owned subsidiaries on an aggregate basis, taking into account all services performed by the officers, whether for Dominion or one or more of its subsidiaries. All of Virginia Power’s NEOs, except for Mr. Heacock, are NEOs of Dominion. For the NEOs included in Dominion’s annual proxy statement, these aggregate amounts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table and related executive compensation tables. For purposes of reporting each NEO’s compensation from Virginia Power in the Summary Compensation Table (and related tables that follow) in this Item 11, the aggregate compensation for each NEO is pro-rated based on the ratio of services performed by the NEO for Virginia Power to the NEO’s

total services performed for all of Dominion. For officers who are NEOs of both Virginia Power and Dominion, the amounts reported in the tables below are part of, and not in addition to the aggregate compensation amounts that are reported for these NEOs in Dominion’s 20112013 Proxy Statement. The CD&A below discusses the CGN Committee’s decisions with respect to each NEO’s aggregate compensation for all services performed for all of Dominion, not just the pro-ratapro-rated portion attributable to the NEO’s services for Virginia Power.

OBJECTIVESOF DOMINIONS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMANDTHE COMPENSATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

Objectives

Dominion’s executive compensation philosophy is to provide a competitive total compensation program tied to performance and aligned with the interests of Dominion shareholders, employees and customers.

The major objectives of Dominion’s compensation program are to:

Ÿ 

Attract, develop and retain an experienced and highly qualified management team;

Ÿ 

Motivate and reward superior performance that supports theDominion’s business and strategic plans and contributes to the long-term success of the company;

Ÿ 

Align the interests of management with those of Dominion’s shareholders and customers by placing a substantial portion of pay at risk through performance goals that, if achieved, are expected to increase total shareholder return;TSR and enhance customer service;

Ÿ 

Promote internal pay equity; and

Ÿ 

Reinforce Dominion’s four core values of safety, ethics, excellence and “One Dominion” – One Dominion—Dominion’s term for teamwork.

These objectives provide the framework for the compensation decisions. To determine if Dominion is meeting the objectives of its compensation program, the CGN Committee reviews and compares Dominion’s actual performance to its short-term and long-term goals, strategies, and peer companies’ performance.

Dominion’s 20102012 performance indicates that the design of Dominion’s compensation program is meeting these objectives. The NEOs have service with Dominion ranging from 1214 to 3436 years. Dominion has attracted, motivated and maintained a superior leadership team with skills, industry knowledge and institutional experience that strengthen their ability to act as sound stewards of Dominion’s shareholder dollars. Dominion is performing well relative to its internal goals and as compared to its peers.

In 2012, Dominion shareholders voted on the executive compensation program (also known as “Say on Pay”) and approved it on an advisory basis by almost 95%, which followed approval of 94% in the prior year. The CGN Committee considered the very strong shareholder endorsement of the CGN Committee’s decisions and policies and Dominion’s overall executive compensation program in continuing the pay-for-performance program that is currently in place without any specific changes for 2013 based on the vote. Unless Dominion’s

129


Board of Directors modifies its policy on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay advisory votes, shareholders will have an opportunity annually to cast an advisory vote in connection with executive compensation. Dominion will ask shareholders, on an advisory basis, to vote on the frequency of the Say-on-Pay vote at least once every six years, with the next advisory vote on frequency to be held no later than Dominion’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Process for Setting Compensation

The CGN Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving NEO compensation and the overall executive compensation program. Each year, the CGN Committee reviews and considers a comprehensive assessment and analysis of the executive compensation program, including the elements of each NEO’s compensation, with input from management and the independent compensation consultant. As part of its assessment, the CGN Committee reviews the performance of the CEO and other executive officers, meets at least annually with the CEO to discuss succession planning for his position and the positions of the company’sDominion’s senior officers, reviews the share ownership guidelines and executive officer compliance with the guidelines, and establishes compensation programs designed to achieve Dominion’s objectives.

129


THE ROLEOFTHE INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

The CGN Committee’s practiceCommittee has been to retainretained an independent compensation consultant, PM&P, to advise the committee on executive and director compensation matters. PM&P does not provide any services to Dominion other than its consulting services to the CGN Committee related to executive and director compensation. The PM&P consultant participates in meetings with the CGN Committee, either in person or by teleconference, and communicates directly with the chairman of the committee outside of the committee meetings as requested by the chairman of the committee. PM&P also reviewed meeting materials as requested for the CGN Committee and provided the following services related to the 20102012 executive compensation program:

Ÿ

Provided independent advice to the CGN Committee regarding the appropriateness of Dominion’s peer group;

Ÿ 

Participated in CGN Committee executive sessions without management present to discuss CEO compensation and any other relevant matters, including the appropriate relationship between pay and performance and emerging trends, to answer technical questions, and to review and comment on management proposals and analyses of peer group compensation data;proposals; and

Ÿ 

Generally reviewed and offered advice as requested by or on behalf of the CGN Committee regarding other aspects of the executive compensation program, including special awards, best practices and other matters.

PM&P received compensation from Dominion for consulting services related only to executive and director compensation, except for $3,300 related to Dominion’s participation in one natural gas transmission compensation survey which was administered by PM&P. PM&P did not provide any additional services to Dominion.

The CGN Committee has reviewed and considered information provided to the CGN Committee by its PM&P consultant, the CGN Committee members and Dominion’s executive officers, and based on its review and such factors as it deemed relevant, the CGN Committee has concluded that the advice it receives from PM&P is objective and that PM&P’s work did not raise any conflict of interest.

MANAGEMENTS ROLEIN DOMINIONS PROCESS

Although the CGN Committee has the responsibility to approve and monitor all compensation for the NEOs, management plays an important role in determining executive compensation. Under the direction of the Corporate Secretary, internal compensation specialists provide the CGN Committee with data, analysis and counsel regarding the executive compensation program, including an ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of the program, peer practices, and executive compensation trends and best practices. The CEO, CFO and Corporate Secretary, along with the internal compensation and financial specialists, assist in the design of the incentive compensation plans, including performance target recommendations consistent with the strategic goals of the company, and inrecommendations for establishing the peer group. Management also works with the Chairman of the CGN Committee to establish the agenda and prepare meeting information for each committeeCGN Committee meeting.

On an annual basis,As discussed previously, the CEO is responsible for reviewing senior officer succession plans with the CGN Committee Dominion’s succession plans for his own position and for Dominion’s senior officers.on an annual basis. He is also responsible for reviewing the performance of his senior officers, including the other NEOs, with the CGN Committee at least annually. He makes recommendations on the compensation and benefits for the NEOs (other than himself) to the CGN Committee and provides other information and counsel as appropriate or as requested by the CGN Committee, but all decisions are ultimately made by the CGN Committee.

THE PCEER GROUPANDOMPENSATION PEER GROUP COMPARISONS

EachThe CGN Committee uses two peer groups for executive compensation. The Compensation Peer Group is used to assess the competitiveness of the compensation of the NEOs. Starting with the 2012 Performance Grant, a separate Performance Grant Peer Group is used to evaluate the relative performance of Dominion for purposes of the LTIP. (See2012 Performance Grants for additional information.) In the fall of each year, the CGN Committee approves a peer groupCompensation Peer Group of companies. In selecting the peer group,Compensation Peer Group, Dominion uses a methodology generally recommended by PM&P to identify companies in the industry

that compete for customers, executive talent and investment capital. Dominion screens this group based on size and usually eliminates companies that are much smaller or larger than Dominion’s size in revenues, assets and market capitalization. Dominion also considers the geographic locations and the regulatory environment in which potential peer companies operate.

Dominion’s peer groupCompensation Peer Group is generally consistent from year to year, with merger and acquisition activity being the primary reason for any changes. The 2010No changes were made to the peer group was the sameused for setting compensation for 2012. The members of Dominion’s Compensation Peer Group are as the 2009 peer group and consisted of the following 14 energy companies:follows:

 

Ameren Corporation

FirstEnergy Corp.

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

ConstellationCMS Energy Group, Inc.Corporation

DTE Energy Company

Duke Energy Corporation

NextEra Energy, Inc.

NiSource, Inc.

PPL Corporation

Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.

Entergy Corporation

Exelon Corporation

  

FirstEnergy Corp.The Southern Company

NextEraXcel Energy Inc. (formerly FPL Group, Inc.)

NiSource, Inc.

PPL Corporation

Progress Energy, Inc.

Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.

Southern Company

130


The CGN Committee PM&P and management use peer company data from the Compensation Peer Group prepared by management to: (i) compare Dominion’s stock and financial performance against its peers using a number of different metrics and time periods to evaluate how Dominion is performing as compared to its peers; (ii) analyze compensation practices within the industry; (iii) evaluate peer company practices and determine peer median and 75th percentile ranges for base pay, annual incentive pay, long-term incentive pay and total direct compensation, both generally and for specific positions; and (iv) compare Employment Continuity Agreementsbenefits and other benefits.perquisites. In setting the levels for base pay, annual incentive pay, long-term incentive pay and total direct compensation, the CGN Committee also takes into consideration Dominion’s larger size compared with the median of the peer group.Compensation Peer Group.

SURVEY DATA

During 2009 and 2010, survey compensation data was used only to provide a general understanding of compensation practices and trends. Dominion did not benchmark or otherwise use broad-based market data as the basis for 2009 or 2010 compensation decisions for the NEOsNEOs. Survey compensation data is used only to provide a general understanding of compensation practices and other senior officers. Going forward, thetrends. The CGN Committee intends to continue its practice of emphasizingtakes into account individual and company specific considerations,factors, including internal pay equity, along with peer company data from the Compensation Peer Group in establishing compensation opportunities. The CGN Committee believes that this emphasis better reflects Dominion’s specific needs in its distinct competitive market and with respect to its size and complexity versus its peers.

COMPENSATION DESIGNAND RISK

Management,Dominion’s management, including Dominion’s chief risk officer and other executives, annually reviews the overall structure of Dominion’s executive compensation program and policies to ensure they are consistent with effective management of enterprise key risks and that they do not encourage executives to take unnecessary or excessive risks that could threaten the value of the enterprise. With respect to the programs and policies that apply to the NEOs, this review includes:

Ÿ 

Analysis of how different elements of the compensation programs may increase or mitigate risk-taking;

130


Ÿ 

Analysis of performance metrics used for short-term and long-term incentive programs and the relation of such incentives to the objectives of Dominion;

Ÿ 

Analysis of whether the performance measurement periods for short-term and long-term incentive compensation are appropriate; and

Ÿ 

Analysis of the overall structure of compensation programs as related to business risks.

Among the factors considered in management’s assessment are: the balance of the overall program design, including the mix of cash and equity compensation; the mix of fixed and variable compensation; the balance of short-term and long-term objectives of incentive compensation; the performance metrics, performance targets, threshold performance requirements and capped payouts related to incentive compensation; the clawback provision on incentive compensation; Dominion’s share ownership guidelines, including share ownership levels and retention practices; prohibitions on hedging, pledging, and other derivative transactions related to Dominion stock; and internal controls and oversight structures in place.place at Dominion.

Management reviewed and discussedprovided the results of this assessment withto the CGN Committee. Based on this review, the CGN Committee believes that Dominion’s well-balanced mix of salary and short-term and long-term incentives, as well as the performance

metrics that are included in the incentive programs, are appropriate and consistent with Dominion’s risk management practices and overall strategies.

OTHER TOOLS

The CGN Committee uses a number of tools in its annual review of the compensation of theDominion’s CEO and other NEOs, including charts illustrating the total range of payouts for each performance-based compensation element under a number of different scenarios; spreadsheets showing the cumulative dollar impact on total direct compensation that could result from implementing proposals on any single element of compensation; graphs showing the relationship between the CEO’s pay and that of the next highest-paid officer and Dominion’s NEOs as a group; and other information the CGN Committee may request in its discretion. Management’s internal compensation specialists provide the CGN Committee with detailed comparisons of the design and features of Dominion’s long-term incentive and other executive benefit programs with available information regarding similar programs at the peer companies.companies in the Compensation Peer Group. These tools are used as part of the overall process to ensure that the program results in appropriate pay relationships as compared to Dominion’s peer companies and internally among theDominion’s NEOs, and that an appropriate balance of at-risk, performance-based compensation is maintained to support the program’s core objectives. No material adjustments were made to Dominion’s NEO’s compensation as a result of using these tools.

 

 

131


 

ELEMENTSOF DOMINIONS COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The executive compensation program consists of four basic elements:

 

Pay Element  Primary Objectives  Key Features & Behavioral Focus

Base Salary

  

Ÿ      Provide competitive level of fixed cash compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities

Ÿ      Attract and retain talent

  

Ÿ      Generally targeted at or slightly above peer median, with individual and company-wide considerations

Ÿ      Rewards individual performance and level of experience

Annual Incentive Plan

  

Ÿ      Provide competitive level of at-risk cash compensation for achievement of short-term financial and operational goals

Ÿ       Align short-term compensation with Dominion’s annual budget,
earnings goals, business plans and core values

  

Ÿ      Cash payments based on achievement of annual financial and individual operating and stewardship goals

Ÿ      Rewards achievement of annual financial goals for Dominion andas well as business unit and individual goals selected to support longer-term strategies

Long-Term Incentive Program

  

Ÿ      Provide competitive level of at-risk compensation for achievement of long-term performance goals

Ÿ      Create long-term shareholder value

Ÿ      Retain talent and support the succession planning process

  

Ÿ      A combination of performance-based cash and restricted stock awards (for 2010, a 50/50 mix)

Ÿ      Encourages and rewards officers for making decisions and investments that create long-term shareholder value as reflected in superior relative total shareholder returns, as well as achieving desired returns on invested capitalROIC

Employee and Executive Benefits

  

Ÿ      Provide competitive retirement and other benefit programs that attract and retain highly qualified individuals

Ÿ       Provide competitive terms to encourage officers to remain with Dominion during any potential change in control to ensure an orderly transition of management

  

Ÿ      Includes company-wide benefit programs, executive retirement plans, limited perquisites, and change in control and other agreements, supplemented with non-compete provisions in the non-qualified retirement plans

Ÿ      Encourages officers to remain with Dominion long-term and to act in the best interestinterests of shareholders, even during any potential change in control

 

Factors in Setting Compensation

As part of the process of setting compensation targets, approving payouts and designing future programs, the CGN Committee evaluates Dominion’s overall performance versus its business plans and strategies, its short-term and long-term goals and the performance of its peer companies. In addition to considering Dominion’s overall performance for the year, the CGN Commit-

teeCommittee takes into consideration several individual factors that are not given any specific weighting in setting each element of compensation for each NEO, including:

Ÿ 

An officer’s experience and job performance;

Ÿ 

The scope, complexity and significance of responsibility for a position, including any differences from peer company positions;

131


Ÿ 

Internal pay equity considerations, such as the relative importance of a particular position or individual officer to Dominion’s strategy and success, and comparability to other officer positions at Dominion;

Ÿ 

Retention and market competitive concerns; and

Ÿ 

The officer’s role in any succession plan for other key positions.

The CGN Committee evaluates each NEO’s base salary, total cash and total direct compensation opportunities against peer group data both at peer group median andfrom the 75th percentile,Compensation Peer Group to ensure the compensation levels are appropriately competitive, but except for base salary, does not target these compensation levels at a particular percentile or range of the peer group data. Base salaryFor Mr. Heacock, the same evaluation process is generally targeted at or slightly aboveperformed using the Towers Watson Energy Services data instead of peer group 50th percentile (median). Compensation decisions are based on whatdata. See Exhibit 99.3 for a listing of the CGN Committee deems appropriate, taking into consideration a number of factors, including those discussed above. However, actual compensation targets may range from below peer median to at or abovecompanies included in the 75th percentile based on a number of factors including experience, tenure and internal pay equity considerations.survey. As part of this analysis, the CGN Committee also takes into account Dominion’s larger size and complexity compared to its peer companies.the companies in the Compensation Peer Group.

In setting compensation for 2010, due to volatile market conditions and budget considerations,2012, Dominion provided a modest increase in base salaries were generally maintained at the 2009 levelssalary for all officers, including all NEOs, and made adjustments were made to performance-based compensation target levels for certain officers. Based on the review of peer company compensation data from the Compensation Peer Group, each NEO’s job performance, recent promotions and internal pay equity considerations such as scope and complexity of the position relative to other positions at the company,Dominion, the CGN Committee determined it was appropriate to increase the target levels under the annual incentive plan2012 AIP for Mr. Christian as described below inAnnual Incentive Plan and the LTIP for Messrs. McGettrick, and Christian and for all of the NEOs under the long-term incentive program,Koonce as described below in Base Salary, Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Program.Program.

CEO Compensation Relative to Other NEOs

Mr. Farrell participates in the same compensation programs and receives compensation based on the same philosophy and factors as other NEOs. Application of the same philosophy and factors to Mr. Farrell’s position results in overall CEO compensation that is significantly higher than the compensation of the other NEOs. His compensation is commensurate with his greater responsibilities and decision-making authority, broader scope of duties that encompassesencompassing the entirety of the companyDominion (as compared to the other NEOs who are responsible for significant but distinct areas within the company)Dominion) and his overall responsibility for corporate strategy. His compensation also reflects his role as the primaryprincipal corporate representative to investors, customers, regulators, analysts, legislators, industry and the media.

Dominion considers CEO compensation trends as compared to the next highest-paid officer, as well as to other executive officers as a group, over a multi-year period to monitor the ratio of Mr. Farrell’s pay relative to the pay of other executive officers based on (i) salary only and (ii) total direct compensation. Dominion also compares its ratios to that of its peers to confirm

132


that its ratios are consistent with practices at the peer companies. There is no particular targeted ratio or goal, but instead the CGN

Committee considers year-to-year trends and comparisons with peer companies. The CGN Committee did not make any adjustments to the compensation of any NEOs based on this review in 2010.2012.

Allocation of Total Direct Compensation in 20102012

Consistent with Dominion’s objective to reward strong performance based on the achievement of short-term and long-term goals, a significant portion of total cash and total direct compensation is at risk. Total direct compensation is the sum of base salary, targeted AIP compensation and targeted long-term incentive compensation. Approximately 88%87% of Mr. Farrell’s targeted 20102012 total direct compensation is performance-based, tied to pre-approved performance metrics, including relative TSR and ROIC, or tied to the performance of Dominion’s stock. For the other NEOs, performance-based and stock-based compensation ranges from 71%65% to 79%80% of targeted 20102012 total direct compensation. This compares to an average of approximately 53%52% of targeted compensation at risk for most officers at the vice president level and an average of approximately 12% of total pay at risk for non-officer employees.

The charts below illustrate the elements of total direct compensation opportunities in 20102012 for Mr. Farrell and the average of the other NEOs as a group and the allocation of such compensation among base salary, targeted 2010 annual incentive plan2012 AIP award and targeted 20102012 long-term incentive compensation.

 

*Chart does not include the restricted stock grant made to Mr. Farrell for strategic and retention purposes in December 2010, as discussed under Other Restricted Stock Grant.

Base Salary

Base salary compensates officers, along with the rest of the work force,workforce, for committing significant time to working on Dominion’s

behalf. Annual salary reviews achieve two primary purposes: (i) an annual adjustment, as appropriate, to keep salaries in line and

132


competitive with the peer groupCompensation Peer Group and to reflect changes in responsibility, including promotions; and (ii) a motivational tool to acknowledge and reward excellent individual performance, special skills, experience, the strategic impact of a position relative to other Dominion executives and other relevant considerations.

The primary goal is to compensate its officers at a level that best achieves itsDominion’s objectives and reflects the considerations discussed above. Dominion believes that an overall goal of targeting base salary at or slightly above the peer groupCompensation Peer Group median is a conservative but appropriate target for base pay. However, an individual’s compensation may be below or above Dominion’s target range based on a number of factors such as performance, tenure, and other factors explained above inFactors in Setting Compensation. In addition to being ranked above or at the peer groupCompensation Peer Group median in 20102012 in terms of revenues, assets and market capitalization, the scope of Dominion’s business operations is complex and unique in its industry. Successfully managing such a broad and complex business requires a skilled and experienced management team. Dominion believes it would not be able to successfully recruit and retain such a team if the base pay for officers was generally below the peer groupCompensation Peer Group median.

Although individual and company performance would have supported merit increases for 2010 for the NEOs, due to uncertain market conditions and the current economic climate, For 2012, the CGN Committee frozeapproved a 7.5% base salariessalary increase for most officers, including all NEOs at their 2009 levels.

Messrs. Farrell and Christian, a 3% base salary increase for Messrs. McGettrick and Koonce and a 4% base salary increase for Mr. Heacock. In September 2010,determining the base salary increase for Mr. Farrell, the CGN Committee considered Dominion’s exceptionalstrong performance year-to-datein 2011 as well as Mr. Farrell’s individual performance, the complexity of Dominion and determined it was appropriate to authorize a one-time, 2% merit lump sum payment to all employees (other than those whose compensation is determined pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement). This 2% merit lump sum payment was also paid to all NEOs. The 2% merit lump sum payment was withinenergy industry itself and Mr. Farrell’s leadership in the range of general market increases for 2010 merit awards, based on Dominion’s understanding of compensation practices and trends. As a special one-time lump sum payment, however, the payment did not increase base salaries or change compensation levels used in calculating retirement planindustry and other employee benefits.factors. For Mr. Christian, the CGN Committee took into consideration that Mr. Christian’s base salary was slightly below the Compensation Peer Group median, the increased competitiveness for nuclear industry expertise and the size of the Dominion Generation business unit, which is the largest of Dominion’s three business units, relative to Dominion’s other business units and other factors. Effective January 1, 2013, the CGN Committee increased Mr. Koonce’s base salary 10% to recognize his increased responsibility as CEO of the Energy Infrastructure Group with the CEO of the Dominion Energy business unit reporting to him.

Annual Incentive Plan

OVERVIEW

The AIP plays an important role in meeting Dominion’s overall objective of rewarding strong performance. The AIP is a cash-based program focused on short-term goal accomplishments and is designed to:

Ÿ 

Tie interests of Dominion’s shareholders, customers and employees closely together;

Ÿ 

Focus the workforce on company, operating group, team and individual goals that ultimately influence operational and financial results;

Ÿ 

Reward corporate and operating unit earnings performance;

Ÿ 

Reward safety and other operating and stewardship goal success;successes;

133


Ÿ 

Emphasize teamwork by focusing on common goals;

Ÿ 

Appropriately balance risk and reward; and

Ÿ 

Provide a competitive total compensation opportunity.

TARGET AWARDS

An NEO’s compensation opportunity under the AIP is based on a target award. Target awards are determined as a percentage of a

participant’s base salary (for example, 95%85% of base salary). The target award is the amount of cash that will be paid if a participant achieves a score of 100% for the goals established at the beginning of the year and the plan is funded at the full funding target set for the year.year and a participant achieves a score of 100% for the payout goals. Participants who retire during the plan year are eligible to receive a pro-ratedprorated payment of their AIP award after the end of the plan year based on final funding and goal achievement. Participants who voluntarily terminate employment during the plan year and who are not eligible to retire (before attainment of age 55) forfeit their AIP award.

AIP target award levels are established based on a number of factors, including historical practice, individual and company performance and internal pay equity considerations, and are compared against peer groupCompensation Peer Group data to ensure the appropriate competitiveness of an NEO’s total cash compensation opportunity. However, as discussed above, AIP target award levels arewere not targeted at a specific percentile or range of the peer group data, nor was market survey data used in setting AIP target award levels for 2010.2012. Annual incentive target award levels wereare also consistent with theDominion’s intent to have a significant portion of NEO compensation at risk. The 2010For 2012, Mr. Christian’s AIP targets fortarget award percentage was increased from 85% to 90% of base salary to reflect the NEOs,continued transition of his compensation to a business unit CEO level. There were no changes to the AIP targets as a percentage of their base salary are shown belowfor Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick, Koonce and as compared to their 2009 targets.Heacock for 2012.

 

Name  

2009 AIP

Target Award*

   

2010 AIP

Target Award*

   2011 AIP
Target Award*
   2012 AIP
Target Award*
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

   125%     125%     125%     125%  

Mark F. McGettrick

   95%     100%     100%     100%  

David A. Christian

   85%     90%  

Paul D. Koonce

   90%     90%     90%     90%  

David A. Christian

   80%     85%  

James F. Stutts

   80%     80%  

David A. Heacock

   70%     70%  

* As a % of base salary

The 2010 AIP targets for Messrs. Farrell, Koonce and Stutts were the same as their 2009 AIP targets at 125%, 90% and 80% of base salary, respectively.

Mr. McGettrick transitioned from the role of CEO of the Dominion Generation business unit to CFO of Dominion in 2009, but he did not receive an increase in his AIP target in 2009 when he became Dominion’s CFO. Due to Mr. McGettrick’s increased responsibility as Dominion’s CFO, Mr. McGettrick’s 2010 AIP target increased from 95% to 100%. Similarly, Mr. Christian’s AIP target did not increase in 2009 when he transitioned from CNO to CEO of the Generation business unit. Due to the increased scope of responsibility in his new position, the CGN Committee determined it was appropriate to increase the AIP target for 2010 from 80% to 85% for Mr. Christian.

FUNDINGOFTHE 20102012 AIP

Funding of the 20102012 AIP was based solely on consolidated operating earnings per share, with potential funding ranging from 0% to 200% of the target funding. Consolidated operating earnings are Dominion’s reported earnings determined in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for certain items. Dominion believes that by placing a focus on pre-established consolidated operating earnings per share targets, it increases employee awareness of the company’s financial objectives and encourages behavior and performance that will help achieve these objectives.

The 2010For the 2012 AIP, hadthe CGN Committee established a full funding target of $3.30 consolidatedat 100% for the NEOs at $3.05 operating earnings per share, the approximate mid-pointinclusive of

133


Dominion’s 2010 earnings guidance announced in January 2010. Funding is based on a formula that provides proportionate sharing of consolidated operating earnings between AIP participants and shareholders until the full funding target is achieved. Consolidated operating earnings above the fullfor all plan participants. The maximum funding target of $3.30200% was set at $3.15 operating earnings per share, are shared equally with shareholders, up to the maximum AIPand no funding level of 200% at $3.40if operating earnings were less than $3.05 per share.share (threshold), with the Committee retaining negative discretion to determine the final funding level.

Full funding means that the AIP is 100% funded and participants can receive their full targeted AIP payout if they achieve a score of 100% for their particular goal package, as described below inHow AIP PayoutsAre Determined. At the maximum

plan funding level of 200%, participants can earn up to two times their targeted AIP payout, subject to achievement of their individual goal packages.

Dominion’s consolidated operating earnings for the year ended December 31, 20102012 were $1.97$1.75 billion or $3.34$3.05 per share, as compared to its consolidated reported earnings in accordance with GAAP of $2.81 billion$302 million or $4.76$0.53 per share.* This resulted in 134%share, with enough earnings above $3.05 (before AIP funding) to support 60% funding for the 20102012 AIP.*

*Reconciliation of 20102012 Consolidated Operating Earnings to Reported Earnings. The following items, which are net of tax, are included in Dominion’s 20102012 reported earnings, but are excluded from consolidated operating earnings: $1.4$1.1 billion net benefitloss, including an impairment charge, associated with certain fossil fuel-fired merchant power stations that Dominion decided to market for sale in the third quarter of 2012; $303 million net loss, including impairment charges, primarily resulting from the saleplanned shutdown of Appalachian E&P operations, $206the Kewaunee nuclear merchant power station; $53 million charge related to a workforce reduction program, $155of restoration costs associated with severe storms affecting the Dominion Virginia Power and Dominion North Carolina Power service territories; $22 million net loss from the discontinued operations of two merchant power stations (State Line and loss on sale of Peoples, $127 million impairment charge related to certain merchant generation facilities, $57 million charge related to health care legislation changes,Salem Harbor) that were sold in 2012; and $1$5 million net expensebenefit related to other items.

HOW AIP PAYOUTS ARE DETERMINED

For most officers other than theDominion’s NEOs, payout of their funded AIP awards for 2010 was subjectis contingent solely on the achievement of the consolidated operating financial goal with the CGN Committee retaining negative discretion to lower the payout as it deems appropriate, taking into consideration the accomplishment of the consolidated financial, business unit financial and operating and stewardship goals, including a safety goal. The percentage allocated to each category of goals represents the percentage of the funded award subject to the per-

formanceperformance of that goal. Officer goals are weighted according to their responsibilities. The overall score cannot exceed 100% scoring..

Business unit financial goals provide a line-of-sight performance target for officers within a business unit and, on a combined basis, support the consolidated operating earnings target for Dominion. Operating and stewardship goals provide line-of-sight performance targets that may not be financial and that can be customized for each individual or by segments of each business unit. Operating and stewardship goals promote Dominion’sthe core values of safety, ethics, excellence and teamwork, which in turn contribute to Dominion’s financial success.

The AIP is designed so that AIP payouts earneddiscretionary payout goals adopted by the NEOs will qualify as tax deductible “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). To preserve the tax deduction for payouts made to the NEOs whose compensation is subject to Code Section 162(m), their payout, if any, is contingent solely on the achievement of the consolidated financial goal (weighted 100%). If the consolidated financial goal is met, the CGN Committee has the authority to exercise negative discretion to lower payouts if additional discretionary goals are adopted and these discretionary goals are not achieved.

For the 2010 AIP, all of the NEOs adopted a discretionary safety goal. Messrs. Koonce, Christian and Stutts adopted discretionary business unit financial goals and Mr. Stutts also adopted discretionary operating and stewardship goals. These goalseach NEO are described under20102012 AIP Payouts. The table below shows and the goal weightings applied to these discretionary goals.those goals are shown in the table below.

 

Name  Consolidated
Financial Goal
   Business Unit
Financial Goals
   Operating/
Stewardship*
   Consolidated
Financial Goal
   Business Unit
Financial Goals
   Operating/
Stewardship Goals*
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

   95%     0%     5%     95%          5%  

Mark F. McGettrick

   95%     0%     5%     95%          5%  

David A. Christian

   65%     30%     5%  

Paul D. Koonce

   65%     30%     5%     65%     30%     5%  

David A. Christian

   65%     30%     5%  

James F. Stutts

   40%     30%     30%  

David A. Heacock

   40%     30%     30%  

*5% goal weighting is for a safety goal. Mr. StuttsHeacock had other non-safety operating and stewardship goals as described below.

 

2010 AIP PAYOUTS

The formula for calculating an award is:

The 2010 discretionary business unit financial goals and accomplishment levels for Mr. Koonce (Dominion Virginia Power), Mr. Christian (Dominion Generation) and Mr. Stutts (DRS) were as follows:

Business Unit 

Goal

Threshold

(Net Income)

  

Goal

100% Payout

(Net Income)

  

Actual

2010

(Net Income)

  

2010

Accomplishment

 
(Millions/$)            

Dominion Virginia Power

 $343   $429   $448    100%  

Dominion Generation

 $1,032   $1,290   $1,291    100%  

DRS(1)

 $589   $535   $532    100%  

(1)

Services Company officers and employees carry an expense goal rather than a net income goal.

A discretionary safety goal of minimizing OSHA recordable incident rates to a specified target number was adopted for all of the NEOs. Each NEO achieved his safety goal. In addition to his safety goal, which was weighted 5%, Mr. Stutts had discretionary operating and stewardship goals in four other categories: compliance (weighted 5%); training (weighted 10%); regulatory (weighted 5%); and efficiency improvements (weighted 5%). Mr. Stutts had a compliance goal to improve cycle time for disposition of compliance incident reports. His training goal was to identify in-house training opportunities that would benefit employees and the company. His regulatory goal was to meet deadlines for filings in all jurisdictions and maintain the quality of final work. The efficiency goal was to implement a new legal matters management system and bring to full usage. Mr. Stutts fully achieved all of these operating and stewardship goals.

 

134    

 


 

 

2012 AIP PAYOUTS

The formula for calculating an award is:

The consolidated financial goal was consolidated operating earnings for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $3.05 per share, which was accomplished as described above. The 2012 business unit financial goals and accomplishment levels for Mr. Koonce (DVP), and Messrs. Christian and Heacock (Dominion Generation) were as follows:

Business Unit  Goal
Threshold
(Net Income)
   Goal
100% Payout
(Net Income)
   Actual
2012
Net Income
   

2012

Approved
Accomplishment

 
(Million/$)                
DVP  $431    $539    $559     100%  
Dominion Generation   803     1,004     874     87     

Messrs. Farrell and McGettrick each received partial credit for their safety goal as the DRS business unit had five OSHA recordable incidents which exceeded the target of four or less OSHA recordable incidents with an incidence rate of 0.15 or less. Mr. Christian met his target safety goal of an OSHA incidence rate ranging from 0.16 to 1.31 for certain operating units and recordable incidents of two or fewer for another operating unit in the Dominion Generation business unit. Mr. Koonce met his target safety goal of an OSHA incidence rate of 1.39 and lost time/restricted duty rate of 0.25 for the DVP business unit. Mr. Heacock met his target safety goal of less than seven fleetwide total OSHA recordable injuries (weighted 6%) and his nuclear safety goal of less than six station clock resets for total nuclear fleet (weighted 8%). In addition to his safety goal, Mr. Heacock had operating and stewardship goals in three other categories: environmental compliance (weighted 5%); radiation exposure (weighted 4%); and fleet capacity factor (weighted 7%), Mr. Heacock met all three of these goals.

The CGN Committee exercised negative discretion to lower the payouts for Messrs. Farrell and McGettrick due to their missed safety goals and Messrs. Christian and Heacock due to their missed business unit financial goals. Amounts earned under the 20102012 AIP by NEOs are shown below and are reflected in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of theSummary Compensation Table.

 

Name  Base Salary        Target
Award
      Funding %      

Total Payout

Score %

        

2010 AIP

Payout

   Base Salary   Target
Award*
    Funding%    Total Payout
Score %
   2012 AIP
Payout
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

  $336,000     x     125%     x    134%     x    100%     =    $562,800    $386,319    X   125%    X  60%    X  99%    =  $286,842  

Mark F. McGettrick

   299,414     x     100%     x    134%     x    100%     =     401,215     313,402    X   100%    X  60%    X  99%    =   186,161  

David A. Christian

   327,668    X   90%    X  60%    X  96%    =   169,863  

Paul D. Koonce

   423,215     x     90%     x    134%     x    100%     =     510,397     431,709    X   90%    X  60%    X  100%    =   233,123  

David A. Christian

   293,514     x     85%     x    134%     x    100%     =     334,312  

James F. Stutts

   180,600     x     80%     x    134%     x    100%     =     193,603  

David A. Heacock

   207,766    X   70%    X  60%    X  96%    =   83,771  

*As a % of base salary.

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power forin the year presented.

Messrs. Farrell and McGettrick’s payout scores were calculated as follows:

Name  Consolidated
Financial Goal
Accomplishment
      Goal
Weighting
      Operating/
Stewardship Goal
Accomplishment
      Goal
Weighting
      Total Payout
Score
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

   100%    X  95%    +  80%    X  5%    =  99

Mark F. McGettrick

   100%    X  95%    +  80%    X  5%    =  99

Messrs. Christian, Koonce and Heacock’s payout scores were calculated as follows:

Name Consolidated
Financial Goal
Accomplishment
     Goal
Weighting
     Business Unit
Financial Goal
Accomplishment
     Goal
Weighting
     Operating/
Stewardship Goal
Accomplishment
     Goal
Weighting
      Total Payout
Score
 

David A. Christian

  100%   X  65%   +  87%   X  30%   +  100%   X  5%    =  96%  

Paul D. Koonce

  100%   X  65%   +  100%   X  30%   +  100%   X  5%    =  100%  

David A. Heacock

  100%   X  40%   +  87%   X  30%   +  100%   X  30%    =  96%  

135


 

Long-Term Incentive Program

OVERVIEW

Dominion’s long-term incentive programLTIP focuses on Dominion’s longer-term strategic goals and retention.retention of its executives. Since 2006, 50% of Dominion’s long-term incentives have been full value equity awards in the form of restricted stock with time-based vesting and the other 50% have been performance-based awards. Dominion believes restricted stock serves as a strong retention tool and also creates a focus on Dominion’s stock price to further align the interests of officers with the interests of Dominion’s shareholders.its shareholders and customers. For those officers who have made substantial progress toward their share ownership guidelines, 50% of their long-termthe performance-based award is in the form of a cash performance grant. Officers who have not achieved 50% of their targeted share ownership guideline receive goal-based stock performance grants instead of a cash performance grant. Dividend equivalents are not paid on any performance-based grants. Because officers are expected to retain ownership of shares upon vesting of restricted stock awards, as explained inShare Ownership Guidelines,the long-term cash performance grant balances the program and allows a portion of the long-term incentive award to be accessible to the NEOs during the course of their employment. As all of the NEOs have satisfied their full targeted share ownership, all of the NEOs received the performance-based component of their 2012 long-term incentive award in the form of a cash performance grant.

The CGN Committee approves long-term incentive awards in January each year with a grant date established in early February. This process ensures incentive-based awards are made at the beginning of the performance period and shortly after the public disclosure of Dominion’s earnings for the prior year. Like the AIP target award levels discussed above, long-term incentive target award levels arewere established based on a number of factors, including historical practice, individual and company performance, and internal pay equity considerations, and are compared against peer groupCompensation Peer Group data to ensure the appropriate competitiveness of an NEO’s total direct compensation opportunity. However, as discussed above, long-term incentive target award levels are not targeted at a specific percentile or range of the peer groupCompensation Peer Group data, nor was market survey data a factor in setting long-term incentive target award levels for 2010.2012.

Through 2009,For 2012, the CGN Committee approved increases to the target long-term incentive valuesawards for all NEOs, exceptMessrs. McGettrick, Christian and Koonce as discussed below. There was no change to the target long-term incentive award for Mr. McGettrick, remained atFarrell or for Mr. Heacock.

MCGETTRICK. Among the same target levels as they had been since 2006, which wasfactors considered by the first year Dominion granted performance-based awards as partCGN Committee in determining the amount of the long-term incentive compensation program. Mr. McGettrick’s long-term incentive compensation value has remained at the same target level since 2007.award were Mr. McGettrick’s continued superior performance as CFO and his broad-based experience. The CGN Committee considered the job performance to date of the NEOs, the increased scope of responsibilities assumed and recent promotions or job rotations and determined it was appropriate to approve a 6% increase thein Mr. McGettrick’s target levels for the NEOs’ 2010 long-term incentive awards from their 2006award, which resulted in a 5% increase in total direct compensation at target.

CHRISTIAN. For Mr. Christian’s target level, orlong-term incentive award, the CGN Committee considered, among other factors, Mr. Christian’s performance as CEO of the Dominion Generation business unit and his experience with the company. The CGN Committee also considered the size of the Dominion Generation business unit, which is the largest of Dominion’s three

business units, relative to Dominion’s other business units in determining his target long-term incentive award, the casecontinued transition of Mr. McGettrick,Christian’s compensation to a business unit CEO level and the increased industry competitiveness for personnel with nuclear expertise. The CGN Committee determined it was appropriate to approve an 18% increase in Mr. Christian’s target long-term incentive award, which resulted in a 14% increase in total direct compensation at target.

KOONCE. Among the factors considered by the CGN Committee in determining the amount of Mr. Koonce’s award were Mr. Koonce’s performance as CEO of the DVP business unit and his 2007experience and long tenure with Dominion. The CGN Committee determined it was appropriate to approve a 13% increase in Mr. Koonce’s target level.long-term incentive award, which resulted in a 9% increase in total direct compensation at target.

Information regarding the fair value of 2010the 2012 restricted stock grants and target cash performance grants for the NEOs is provided in theGrants of Plan-Based Awardstable.

20102012 RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS

All officers received a restricted stock grant on February 1, 20102012 based on a stated dollar value. The number of shares awarded was determined by dividing the stated dollar value by the closing price of Dominion’s common stock on January 29, 2010.February 1, 2012. The grants have a three-year vesting term, with cliff vesting at the end of the restricted period on February 1, 2013. Mr. Stutts’ grant vested pro-rata upon his retirement on January 1, 2011 based on a determination by the CEO that Mr. Stutts’ retirement would not be detrimental to the company.2015. Dividends are paid to officers during the restricted period. The grant date fair value and vesting terms of the 20102012 restricted stock grant awards made to the NEOs isare disclosed in theGrants of Plan-Based Awardstable. table and related footnotes.

20102012 PERFORMANCE GRANTS

Most officers, includingIn January 2012, the NEOs, receivedCGN Committee approved cash performance grants onfor the NEOs, effective February 1, 2010. Officers who had not achieved 50% of their targeted share ownership guideline received stock-based performance grants. Dividend equivalents are not paid on any performance-based grants.2012. The performance period commenced on January 1, 20102012 and will end on December 31, 2011. Mr. Stutts’ payout, if any, under his 2010 performance grant will be determined after the end of the performance period ending December 31, 2011 and will be pro-rated based on his months of service during such period.2013. The 20102012 grants are denominated as a target award, with potential payouts ranging from 0-200% of the target based on Dominion’s TSR relative to the peer groupa Performance Grant Peer Group of companies selected by the CGN Committee and ROIC, weighted equally.

The TSR metric was selected to focus officers on long-term shareholder value when developing and implementing their strategic plans and in turn, reward management based on the achievement of TSR levels as measured relative to Dominion’s peer companies. The ROIC metric was selected to reward officers for the achievement of expected levels of return on the company’sDominion’s investments. Dominion believes an ROIC measure encourages management to choose the right investments, and with those investments, to achieve the highest returns possible through prudent decisions, management and control of costs. The target awards and vesting terms of the 20102012 performance grants made to the NEOs are disclosed in theGrants of Plan-Based Awardstable. table and related footnotes.

 

 

136   135

 


 

 

Performance Grant Peer Group

Since performance grants were first awarded in 2006, Dominion’s TSR performance has been measured relative to a Performance Grant Peer Group that included the same companies included in its peer group for compensation setting purposes.

For the 2011 Performance Grant, the peer group used in measuring relative TSR is the same group of companies included in the Compensation Peer Group, excluding Constellation and Progress Energy due to their mergers with Exelon and Duke, respectively (2011 Performance Grant Peer Group). Following its annual review of the design of the LTIP, the CGN Committee approved measuring TSR performance for the 2012 Performance Grant against the TSR of the companies listed as members of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index at the end of the performance period (2012 Performance Grant Peer Group). In selecting the Philadelphia Utility Index, the CGN Committee took into consideration that the companies represented in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index are similar to those companies currently included in Dominion’s Compensation Peer Group and the index itself is a recognized published index whose members are determined externally and independently from Dominion. The CGN Committee also took into consideration the past and recent mergers within the utility industry and the effects of consolidation on the size of Dominion’s Performance Grant Peer Group. The companies in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index at the grant date of the 2012 Performance Grant were as follows:

The AES Corporation

Ameren Corporation

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Covanta Holding Corporation

DTE Energy Company

Duke Energy Corporation

Edison International

El Paso Electric Company

Entergy Corporation

Exelon Corporation

FirstEnergy Corp.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

Northeast Utilities

PG&E Corporation

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated

The Southern Company

Xcel Energy Inc.

For 2012 Performance Grants, the CGN Committee also approved recalibrating the performance grant payout scale for the TSR metric so that payout will be capped at 200% at the 85th percentile of the Performance Grant Peer Group rather than at the 100th percentile, which is consistent with the long-term incentive plans of several companies in Dominion’s Compensation Peer Group. No other changes were made to the payout scale with payout at target (or 100%) remaining at the 50th percentile of the Performance Grant Peer Group, payout at threshold (or 50%) at the 25th percentile and no payout for relative TSR below the 25th percentile.

PAYOUT UNDER 20092011 PERFORMANCE GRANTS

In February 2011,2013, final payouts were made to officers who received 20092011 performance grants, including the NEOs. The 20092011 performance grants were based on threetwo goals: TSR for the two-year period ended December 31, 20102012 relative to Dominion’s peer group of companies2011 Performance Peer Group (weighted 50%); and ROIC for the same two-year period (weighted 40%); and BVP as of December 31, 2010 (weighted 10%50%).

Ÿ 

Relative TSR (50% weighting).. TSR is the difference between the value of a share of common stock at the beginning and

end of the two-year performance period, plus dividends paid as if reinvested in stock. For this metric, Dominion’s TSR is compared to TSR levels at its peerof the companies in the 2011 Performance Grant Peer Group for the same two-year period. The peer group for the TSR metric for the 2009 performance grant is the same group of companies described above inThe Peer Group and Peer Group Comparisons. The relative TSR targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2011 performance grant are as follows:

 

Relative TSR Performance 

Percentage Payout of

TSR Percentage*

Top1st Quartile – 75% to 100%

 

150% – 200%

2ndQuartile – 50% to 74.9%

 100% – 149.9%

3rdQuartile – 25% to 49.9%

 50% – 99.9%

4thQuartile – below 25%

 0%

 

 *TSRTSR weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile. A minimum payment of 25% of the TSR percentage will be made if the TSR performance is at least 10% on a compounded annual basis for the performance period, regardless of relative performance.

Actual relative TSR performance for the 2009-20102011-2012 period was in the topsecond quartile. Dominion’s TSR for the two-year period ended December 31, 2012 was 31.6%, which ranked sixth relative to the peer group which was comprised of the same companies in the Compensation Peer Group and placed Dominion ahead of nine of the 14 peer companies.

 

Ÿ 

ROIC (40%(50% weighting).ROIC reflects the company’sDominion’s total return divided by average invested capital for the performance period. The ROIC goal at target is consistent with the strategic plan/annual business plan as approved by theDominion’s Board. For this purpose, total return is the company’sDominion’s consolidated operating earnings plus its after-tax interest and related charges, plus preferred dividends. Dominion designed its 20092011 ROIC goals to provide 100% payout if it achieved an average ROIC of 8.86%7.60% over the two-year performance period. The ROIC performance targets and corresponding payout scores are as follows:

 

ROIC Performance  Percentage Payout of
ROIC Percentage*
 

9.26%7.88% and above

   200%  

9.06%7.74%9.25%7.87%

   150% –199.9%– 199.9%  

8.86%7.60%9.05%7.73%

   100% – 149.9%  

8.66%7.46%8.85%7.59%

   50% – 99.9%  

Below 8.66%7. 46%

   0%  

 *ROICROIC percentage payout is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages for any range.

Actual ROIC performance for the 2009-20102011-2012 period was 8.82%.

Ÿ

BVP(10% weighting). BVP measures the company’s value according to its balance sheet (the difference between assets

and liabilities) as opposed to the market value of company stock, subject to certain pre-approved exclusions, whether positive or negative, as set forth in the awards. It measures the use of funds as well as the efficiency of issuing stock. The CGN Committee applied7.40% which produced a 10% weighting to this measure in order to allow a mix of performance measures while maintaining the desired focus on relative TSR and ROIC. BVP was calculated as common shareholders’ equity divided by the number of outstanding shares as of December 31, 2010. The BVP targets and corresponding payout scores are as follows:

Book Value Performance

Percentage Payout of

BVP Percentage*

$22.66 and above

200%

$22.16 – $22.65

150% – 199.9%

$21.66 – $22.15

100% – 149.9%

$21.16 – $21.65

50% – 99.9%

Below $21.16

0%

* BVP percentage payout is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages for any range.

Actual BVP for the 2009-2010 period was $21.89.0%.

Based on the achievement of the performance criteria, the CGN Committee approved a 127.6%64.2% payout for the 20092011 performance grants. The following table summarizes the achievement of the 20092011 performance criteria:

 

Measure  

Goal

Weight%

   

Goal

Achievement%

   Payout%   Goal
Weight%
      Goal
Achievement%
   ��  Payout% 

Relative TSR

   50%     157.0%     78.5%     50%    X     128.5%    =     64.2%  

ROIC

   40%     92.0%     36.8%     50%    X     0%    =     0%  

BVP

   10%     123.4%     12.3%  
                

 

 

Combined Overall Performance Score

Combined Overall Performance Score

  

   127.6%  

Combined Overall Performance Score

  

    64.2%  

137


The resulting payout amounts for the NEOs for the 20092011 performance grants are shown below and are also reflected in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of theSummary Compensation Table.

 

Name  

2009

Performance

Grant Award

      

Overall

Performance

Score

        

Calculated

Performance

Grant Payout

  2011
Performance
Grant Award
    Overall
Performance
Score
    Calculated
Performance
Grant Payout
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

  $840,000     x    127.6%     =    $1,071,840   $1,027,600    X    64.2%    =   $659,719  

Mark F. McGettrick

   345,000     x    127.6%     =     440,220    458,300    X    64.2%    =    294,229  

David A. Christian

  303,525    X    64.2%    =    194,863  

Paul D. Koonce

   382,500     x    127.6%     =     488,070    464,231    X    64.2%    =    298,036  

David A. Christian

   172,250     x    127.6%     =     219,791  

James F. Stutts

   105,000     x    127.6%     =     133,980  

David A. Heacock

  117,650    X    64.2%    =    75,531  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power.Power in the year presented.

Other Restricted Stock GrantGrants

The CGN Committee may consider other restricted stock grants for selected individuals in order to support key objectives including succession planning, talent retention and recruitment. These awards are not considered part of the annual program and are only awarded periodically. In December 2010,2012, the CGN Committee approved a restricted stock grantgrants for Messrs. McGettrick, Koonce and Christian of 28,00021,949, 23,715, and 15,505 shares (these NEOs perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. These share amounts reflect only the applicable portion related to Mr. Farrelltheir service for Virginia Power in the year presented), respectively, to retain and secure histheir services for the next five years to providethree years. In making the leadership stability to implement Dominion’s strategic plans. Therestricted stock grants, the CGN Committee considered the increasing competitiveness of both the utility industry and general industry in retaining executive level officers, especially chief financial officers, chief operating officers and nuclear executives, and succession planning.

Each restricted stock grant supports CEO succession planning and the vesting terms of the grant further align Mr. Farrell’s interests with the interests of shareholders. The restricted shares areis subject to a five-yearthree-year cliff vesting with all

136


shares vesting on December 17,20, 2015 (the Vesting Date). Mr. FarrellThe officer will forfeit the restricted stock grant if his employment with Dominion terminates prior to the Vesting Date for any reason other than a change in control, death or disability. In the event of a change in control, death or disability, the restricted shares are subject to vesting on a pro-rated basis. Dividends will be paid on the restricted shares, but will be retained and subject to the same vesting terms as the restricted shares. To the extent the officer remains an employee of Dominion or a Dominion Company, net shares of vested restricted stock under each agreement must be retained for two years following the Vesting Date unless the officer dies or becomes disabled.

Employee and Executive Benefits

Benefit plans and limited perquisites composedcompose the fourth element of the compensation program. These benefits serve as a retention tool and reward long-term employment.

RETIREMENT PLANS

Dominion sponsors two types of tax-qualified retirement plans for eligible non-union employees, including the NEOs: a defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan)(DPP) and a defined contribution 401(k)

savings plan (the 401(k) Plan).plan. The NEOs, as employees hired before 2008, are eligible for a pension benefit upon attainment of retirement age based on a formula that takes into account final compensation and years of service. They also receive a cash balanceretirement benefit under which the companyDominion contributes 2% of each participant’s compensation to a special retirement account, which may be paid in a lump sum or added to the annuity benefit upon retirement. Dominion began funding the special retirement account for eligible employees in January 2001. The formula for the Pension PlanDPP is explained in the narrative following thePension Benefits table. The change in Pension PlanDPP value for 20102012 for the NEOs is included in theSummary Compensation Table.

Officers whose matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan are limited by the Internal Revenue CodeIRC receive a cash payment to make them whole for the company match lost as a result of these limits. These cash payments are currently taxable. The company matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan and the cash payments of company matching contributions above Internal Revenue CodeIRC limits for the NEOs are included in theAll Other Compensation column of theSummary Compensation Table and detailed in the footnote for that column.

Dominion also maintains two nonqualified retirement plans for its executives, the BRP and the ESRP, for the executives.ESRP. Unlike the Pension PlanDPP and 401(k) Plan, these plans are unfunded, unsecured obligations of Dominion. These plans keep Dominion competitive in attracting and retaining officers. Due to Internal Revenue CodeIRC limits on Pension Planpension plan benefits and because a more substantial portion of total compensation for officers is paid as incentive compensation than for other employees, the Pension PlanDPP and 401(k) Plan alone will produce a lower percentage of replacement income in retirement for officers than these plans will for other employees. The BRP restores benefits that will not be paid under the Pension PlanDPP due to the Internal Revenue CodeIRC limits. The ESRP provides a benefit that covers a portion (25%) of final base salary and target annual incentive compensation to partially make up for this gap in retirement income. The BRP and ESRP do not include long-term incentive compensation in benefit calculations and, therefore, a significant portion of the potential compensation for the officers is excluded from calculation in any retirement plan benefit. As consideration for the benefits earned under the BRP and ESRP, all officers agree to comply with confidentiality and one-year non-competition

requirements set forth in the plan documents following their retirement or other termination of employment. The present value of accumulated benefits under these retirement plans is disclosed in thePension Benefits table and the terms of the plans are fully explained in the narrative following that table.

In May 2010,individual situations and primarily for mid-career changes or retention purposes, the CGN Committee entered into a supplemental retirement agreement with Mr. McGettrick. This agreement restateshas granted certain officers additional years of credited age and clarifiesservice for purposes of calculating benefits under the BRP. Age and service credits granted to the NEOs are described inDominion Retirement Benefit Restoration PlanunderPension Benefits.Additional age and service may also be earned under the terms of prior agreements entered intoan officer’s Employee Continuity Agreement in 2005 and 2007the event of a change in control, as well as the surviving provisionsdescribed inChange in Control underPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.No additional years of his 1999 employment agreement. Mr. McGettrick will earn a lifetime benefit under the ESRP if he remains employed as an officer of Dominion until November 14, 2012, effectively giving him previously earned age andor service credit towardwere granted to the lifetime ESRP benefit that was provided to him under the surviving provisions of his 1999 employment agreement and later restated in a February 2007 letter agreement. As consideration for this benefit, Mr. McGettrick has agreed not to compete with the company for a two-year period following retirement. This agreement ensures that his knowledge and services will not be available to competitors for two years following his retirement date.NEOs during 2012.

138��


OTHER BENEFIT PROGRAMS

OfficersDominion’s officers participate in all of the benefit programs available to other Dominion employees. The core benefit programs generally include medical, dental and vision benefit plans, a health savings account, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, group-term life insurance, travel accident coverage, long-term disability coverage and a paid time off program.

Dominion also maintains an executive life insurance program for officers to replace a former company-wide retiree life insurance program that was discontinued in 2003. The plan is fully insured by individual policies that provide death benefits at a fixed amount depending on an officer’s salary tier. This life insurance coverage is in addition to the group-term insurance that is provided to all employees. The officer is the owner of the policy and Dominion makes premium payments until the later of 10 years from enrollment date or the date the officer attains age 64. Officers are taxed on the premiums paid by Dominion. The premiums for these policies are included in theAll Other Compensation column of theSummary Compensation Table.

PERQUISITES

Dominion provides a limited number of perquisites for officers to enable them to perform their duties and responsibilities as efficiently as possible and to minimize distractions. The CGN Committee annually reviews the perquisites to ensure they are an effective and efficient use of corporate resources. Dominion believes the benefits it receives from offering these perquisites outweigh the costs of providing them. In addition to incidental perquisites associated with maintaining an office, Dominion offers the following perquisites to all officers:

Ÿ 

An allowance of up to $9,500 a year to be used for health club memberships and wellness programs, comprehensive executive physical exams and financial and estate planning. Dominion wants officers to be proactive with preventive healthcare and also wants executives to use professional, independent financial and estate planning consultants to ensure proper tax reporting of company-provided compensation and to help officers optimize their use of Dominion’s retirement and other employee benefit programs.

137


Ÿ 

A vehicle leased by Dominion, up to an established lease-payment limit (if the lease payment exceeds the allowance, the officer pays for the excess amount on the vehicle). The costs of insurance, fuel and maintenance for company-leased vehicles are paid by Dominion.

Ÿ 

In limited circumstances, use of company aircraft for personal travel by executive officers. For security and other reasons, the Board of Directors has directed Mr. Farrell to use the aircraft for all travel, including personal travel, whenever it is feasible to do so. His family and guests may accompany Mr. Farrell on any personal trips. The use of company aircraft for personal travel by other executive officers is limited and usually related to (i) travel with the CEO or (ii) personal travel to accommodate business demands on an executive’s schedule. With the exception of Mr. Farrell, personal use of aircraft is not available when there is a company need for the aircraft. Use of company aircraft saves substantial time and allows usDominion to have better access to the executives for business purposes. During 2010, 96%2012, 97% of the use of corporateDominion’s aircraft was for business purposes. Other than Mr. Farrell, none

of the NEOs or other executive officers used company aircraft for personal travel in 2010.2012.

Other than costs associated with comprehensive executive physical exams (which are exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code)IRC), these perquisites are fully taxable to officers. There is no tax gross-up for imputed income on any perquisites.

EMPLOYMENT CONTINUITY AGREEMENTS

Dominion has entered into Employment Continuity Agreements with all officers to ensure continuity in the event of a change in control ofat Dominion. While Dominion has determined these agreements are consistent with the practices of its peer companies, the most important reason for these agreements is to protect the company in the event of an anticipated or actual change in control of Dominion. In a time of transition, it is critical to protect shareholder value by retaining and continuing to motivate the company’s core management team. In a change in control situation, workloads typically increase dramatically, outside competitors are more likely to attempt to recruit top performers away from the company, and officers and other key employees may consider other opportunities when faced with uncertainties at their own company. Therefore, the Employment Continuity Agreements provide security and protection to officers in such circumstances for the long-term benefit of the companyDominion and its shareholders.

In determining the appropriate multiples of compensation and benefits payable upon a change in control, Dominion evaluated peer group and general practices and considered the levels of protection necessary to retain officers in such situations. The Employment Continuity Agreements are double-trigger agreements that require both a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment to trigger a benefit. The specific terms of the Employment Continuity Agreements are discussed inAdditional Post-Employment Benefits for NEOsunderPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

In January 2013, the CGN Committee approved the elimination of the excise tax gross up provision included in the Employment Continuity Agreement for any new officer elected after February 1, 2013.

OTHER AGREEMENTS

Dominion does not have comprehensive employment agreements or severance agreements for its NEOs. Although the CGN Committee believes the compensation and benefit programs described in this CD&A are appropriate, Dominion, as one of the nation’s largest producers and transporters of energy, is part of a constantly changing and increasingly competitive environment. In recognition of their valuable knowledge and experience and to secure and retain their services, Dominion has entered into letter agreements with eachcertain of theits NEOs to provide certain benefit enhancements or other protections, as described inAdditional Post-Employment Benefits for NEOsDominion Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, Dominion Executive Supplemental Retirement PlanunderandPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control. No new letter agreements were entered into in 2012.

139


OTHER RELEVANT COMPENSATION PRACTICES

Share Ownership Guidelines

Dominion requires officers to own and retain significant amounts of Dominion stock during their careers to align their interests with those of Dominion’s shareholders by promoting a long-term focus through long-term share ownership. The guidelines ensure that management maintains a personal stake in Dominionthe company through significant equity investment in Dominion. Targeted ownership levels are the lesser of the following value or number of shares:

 

Position  Value/# of Shares 

Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer

   8 x salary/145,000  

Executive Vice President – President—Dominion

   5 x salary/35,000  

Senior Vice President – President—Dominion & Subsidiaries/President – President—Dominion Subsidiaries

   4 x salary/20,000  

Vice President – President—Dominion & Subsidiaries

   3 x salary/10,000  

The levels of ownership reflect the increasing level of responsibility for that officer’s position. Shares owned by an officer and his or her immediate family members as well as shares held under companyDominion benefit plans contribute to the ownership targets. Restricted stock, goal-based stock and shares underlying stock options do not contribute to the ownership targets.targets until the shares vest or the options are exercised. Dominion prohibits certain types of transactions related to Dominion stock, including owning derivative securities, hedging transactions, using margin accounts and pledging shares as collateral.

With limited exceptions, officers are expected toUntil an officer meets his or her ownership target, an officer must retain ownership of their Dominionnet shares from stock includingoption exercises and all after-tax shares from vesting restricted stock and goal-based shares that have vested, as long as they remain employed by the company.stock awards. Dominion refers to shares held by an officer that are more than 15% above his or her ownership target as “QualifyingQualifying Excess Shares. Officers may sell, up to 50% of theirgift or transfer Qualifying Excess Shares at any time, subject to insider trading rules and other policy provisions and may sell all Qualifying Excess Shares duringas long as the one-year period preceding retirement. Qualifying Excess Shares may also be giftedsale, gift or transfer does not cause an executive to a charitable organizationfall below his or put into a trust outside of the officer’s control for estate planning purposes at any time.her ownership target.

At least annually, the CGN Committee reviews the share ownership guidelines and monitors compliance by executive officers, both individually and by the officer group as a whole. The NEOs’ ownership is shown in theDirector and Officer Share Ownershiptable;As of January 1, 2013, each NEO exceedsexceeded his share ownership target.

138


target as shown below:

 

    Shares
Owned and Counted
Toward Target(1)
   Share
Ownership
Target(2)
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

   573,972     145,000  

Mark F. McGettrick

   160,559     35,000  

David A. Christian

   78,642     35,000  

Paul D. Koonce

   75,278     35,000  

David A. Heacock

   24,262     20,000  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Amounts shown are actual and not reduced by their Virginia Power allocation factor.

(1)Amounts in this column do not include shares of unvested restricted stock which are not counted toward ownership targets
(2)Share ownership target is the lesser of salary multiple or number of shares

Recovery of Incentive Compensation

Consistent with standards established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Dominion’s Corporate Governance Guidelines authorize the Board to seek recovery of performance-based compensation paid to officers who are found to be personally responsible for fraud or intentional misconduct that causes a restatement of financial results filed with the SEC. Beginning in 2009, the CGN Committee approved a broader clawback provision for inclusion in Dominion’s AIP and long-term incentive performance grant documents. This clawback provision authorizes the CGN Committee, in its discretion and based on facts and circumstances, to recoup AIP and performance grant payouts from any employee whose fraudulent or intentional misconduct (i) directly causes or partially causes the need for a restatement of a financial statement or (ii) relates to or materially affects Dominion’s operations or the employee’s duties at the company. Dominion reserves the right to recover a payout by seeking repayment from the employee, by reducing the amount that would otherwise be payable to the employee under another Dominioncompany benefit plan or compensation program to the extent permitted by applicable law, by withholding future incentive compensation, or any combination of these actions. The clawback provision is in addition to, and not in lieu of, other actions Dominion may take to remedy or discipline misconduct, including termination of employment or a legal action for breach of fiduciary duty, and any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

CodeIRC Section 162(m) generally disallows a deduction by publicly-heldpublicly held corporations for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the CEO and next three most highly-compensatedhighly compensated officers other than the CFO. If certain requirements are met, performance-based compensation qualifies for an exemption from the CodeIRC Section 162(m) deduction limit. Dominion intends to provide competitive executive compensation while maximizing Dominion’s tax deduction. While the CGN Committee considers CodeIRC Section 162(m) tax implications when designing annual and long-term compensation programs and approving payouts under such programs, it reserves the right to approve, and in some cases has approved, non-deductible compensation when corporate objectives justify the cost of being unable to deduct such compensation. Dominion’s tax department has advised the CGN Committee that the cost of any such lost tax deductions is not material to the company.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

Dominion measures and recognizes compensation expense in accordance with the FASB guidance for share-based payments, which requires that compensation expense relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The CGN Committee considers the accounting treatment of equity and performance-based compensation when approving awards.

 

 

140   139

 


 

 

Executive Compensation

 

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE – AN OVERVIEW

 

The Summary Compensation Table provides information in accordance with SEC requirements regarding compensation earned by the NEOs, stock awards made to the NEOs, as well as amounts accrued or accumulated during years reported with respect to retirement plans and other items. The NEOs include the CEO, the CFO, and the three most highly compensated executive officers of Virginia Power other than the CEO and CFO.

The amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table and the other tables below represent the pro-ratedprorated compensation amounts attributable to each NEO’s services performed for Virginia Power. The percentage of each NEO’s overall Dominion services performed for Virginia Power during 20102012 was as follows: Mr. Farrell, 28%29%; Mr. McGettrick, 46%; Mr. Koonce, 85%83%; Mr. Christian, 53%54%; and Mr. Stutts, 42%Heacock, 47%.

The following highlights some of the disclosures contained in this table for the NEOs. Detailed explanations regarding certain types of compensation paid to an NEO are included in the footnotes to the table.

Salary. The amounts in this column are the base salaries earned by the NEOs for the years indicated. For 2010, this amount also includes a 2% merit lump sum payment to all NEOs.

Stock Awards. The amounts in this column reflect the full grant date fair value of the stock awards for accounting purposes for the respective year. The amounts shown for 2008Stock awards are different fromreported in the amounts shownyear in prior years due to a change in SEC reporting requirements.which the awards are granted regardless of when or if the awards vest or are exercised.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. This column includes amounts earned under two performance-based programs: the AIP and cash-based performance grant awards under Dominion’s long-term incentive programs.LTIP. These performance programs are based on performance criteria established by the CGN Committee at the beginning of the performance period, with actual performance scored against the pre-set criteria by the CGN Committee at the end of the performance period.

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings. This column shows any year-over-year increases in the annual accrual of pension and supplemental retirement benefits for the NEOs. These are accruals for future benefits that may be earned under the terms of the retirement plans, and doare not reflect actual payments made during the year to the NEOs. The amounts disclosed reflect the annual change in the

actuarial present value of benefits under defined benefit plans sponsored by the

company,Dominion, which include Dominion’sthe tax-qualified Pension PlanDPP and the nonqualified plans described in the narrative following thePension Benefitstable. The annual change equals the difference in the accumulated amount for the current fiscal year and the accumulated amount for the prior fiscal year, generally using the same actuarial assumptions used for Dominion’s audited financial statements for the applicable fiscal year. For 2009 and 2010, accruedAccrued benefit calculations are based on assumptions that the NEOs would retire at the earliest age at which they are projected to become eligible for full, unreduced pension benefits (including the effect of future service for eligibility purposes), instead of their unreduced retirement age based on current years of service. The application of these assumptions results in a greater increase in the accumulated amount of pension benefits for certain NEOs than would result without the application of these assumptions. This method of calculation does not increase actual benefits payable at retirement but only how much of that benefit is allocated to the increase during 2009 and 2010, respectively. For Mr. McGettrick, the accrued benefit calculation for 2010 also reflectsyears presented in the clarification of the commencement date of his lifetime ESRP benefits.Summary Compensation Table. Please refer to the footnotes to thePension Benefitstable and the narrative following that table for additional information related to actuarial assumptions used to calculate pension benefits.

All Other Compensation. The amounts in this column disclose compensation that is not classified as compensation reportable in another column, including perquisites and benefits with an aggregate value of at least $10,000, the value of company-paid life insurance premiums, company matching contributions to an NEO’s 401(k) Plan account, and company matching contributions paid directly to the NEO that would be credited to the 401(k) Plan if Internal Revenue CodeIRC contribution limits did not apply. For 2010, dividends paid on outstanding restricted stock are not included in All Other Compensation in accordance with SEC rules as the value of the dividends is factored into the grant date fair value of the restricted stock.

Total. The number in this column provides a single figure that represents the total compensation either earned by each NEO for the years indicated or accrued benefits payable in later years and required to be disclosed by SEC rules in this table. It does not reflect actual compensation paid to the NEO during the year, but is the sum of the dollar values of each type of compensation quantified in the other columns in accordance with SEC rules.

 

 

140   141

 


 

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table presents information concerning compensation paid or earned by the NEOs for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010, as well as the grant date fair value of stock awards and changes in pension value.

 

Name and Principal Position  Year   Salary(1)   Stock
Awards(2)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
   Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
   All Other
Compensation(5)
   Total   Year   Salary(1)   Stock
Awards(2)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
   All Other
Compensation(5)
   Total 

Thomas F. Farrell II

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

   2010    $342,720    $2,164,671    $1,634,640    $551,838    $44,950    $4,738,819     2012    $381,827    $1,027,602    $946,561    $1,171,041    $54,815    $3,581,846  
 2009     348,000     870,001     1,604,280     461,615     188,429     3,472,325    2011     393,084     1,127,702     2,351,094     584,944     51,827     4,508,651  
 2008     452,833     1,140,010     2,559,300     997,551     238,040     5,387,734    2010     342,720     2,164,671     1,634,640     551,838     44,950     4,738,819  

Mark F. McGettrick

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

   2010     305,402     413,970     841,435     1,590,831     33,281     3,184,919     2012     311,880     1,632,701     480,389     1,169,718     31,291     3,625,979  
 2009     298,195     345,010     766,034     861,244     83,450     2,353,933    2011     320,948     485,013     1,008,431     802,520     33,962     2,650,874  
 2008     327,253     390,014     1,061,894     376,799     87,288     2,243,248    2010     305,402     413,970     841,435     1,590,831     33,281     3,184,919  

Paul D. Koonce

Executive Vice President and COO—DVP

   2010     431,679     478,139     998,467     642,025     40,721     2,591,031  
 2009     242,983     220,508     533,418     188,154     58,545     1,243,608  

David A. Christian

President and COO—

Generation

   2010    ��299,384     225,247     554,103     661,527     49,013     1,789,274  
 2009     259,229     152,752     434,621     588,777     67,838     1,503,217  
 2008     263,498     159,252     517,672     299,988     64,877     1,305,287  

James F. Stutts

Senior Vice President &

General Counsel

   2010     184,212     178,497     327,583     117,069     57,295     864,656  

David A. Christian

President and COO—Dominion Generation

   2012     323,858     1,166,905     364,726     1,188,167     51,191��    3,094,847  
 2011     309,329     309,058     608,095     682,795     52,785     1,962,062  
 2010     299,384     225,247     554,103     661,527     49,013     1,789,274  

Paul D. Koonce

President and COO—DVP

   2012     429,614     1,764,103     531,159     1,115,497     46,657     3,887,030  
 2011     423,840     471,012     1,107,655     695,145     49,323     2,746,975  
 2010     431,679     478,139     998,467     642,025     40,721     2,591,031  

David A. Heacock

President and CNO

   2012     206,435     117,665     159,303     462,314     22,968     968,685  
 2011     215,395     128,803     318,493     388,820     20,921     1,072,432  
 2010     195,288     114,750     292,961     346,705     19,595     969,299  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power in the year presented.

 

(1)

None of theThe NEOs received athe following base salary increase in 2010. All NEOs received a 2% merit lump sum payment on October 25, 2010, as approved by the CGN Committee on September 24, 2010.increases effective March 1, 2012: Messrs. Farrell and Christian: 7.5%; Mr. Heacock: 4%; and Messrs. McGettrick and Koonce: 3%.

(2)

The amounts in this column reflect the full grant date fair value of stock awards for the respective year grant in accordance with FASB guidance for share-based payments. Dominion did not grant any stock options in 2010. The amount for Mr. Farrell includes a grant of 28,000 shares of restricted stock for retention purposes. See the Grants of Plan Based Awards table for additional information regarding the terms of all restricted stock grants made in 2010.2012. See also Note 2019 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the companies’ 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the valuation of stock-based awards, the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for stock awards granted in 2012, and the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table for a listing of all outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2010.2012.

(3)

The 20102012 amounts in this column include the payout under Dominion’s 20102012 AIP and 20092011 Performance Grant awards.Awards. All of the NEOs received 134%60% funding of their 20102012 AIP target awardsawards. Messrs. Farrell and 100% payoutMcGettrick received 99% payouts for accomplishment of their goals.goals while Messrs. Christian and Heacock received 96% and Mr. Koonce received 100%. The 20102012 AIP payoutspayout amounts were as follows: Mr. Farrell: $562,800;$286,842; Mr. McGettrick: $401,215;$186,161; Mr. Christian: $169,863; Mr. Koonce: $510,397; Mr. Christian: $334,312;$233,123; and Mr. Stutts: $193,603.Heacock: $83,771. See the CD&A for additional information on the 20102012 AIP and the Grants of Plan BasedPlan-Based Awards table for the range of each NEO’s potential award under the 20102012 AIP. The 20092011 Performance Grant awardAward was issued on February 2, 20091, 2011 and the payout amount was determined based on achievement of performance goals for the performance period ended December 31, 2010.2012. Payouts can range from 0% to 200%. The actual payout was 127.6%64.2% of the target amount. The payout amounts were as follows: Mr. Farrell: $1,071,840;$659,719; Mr. McGettrick: $440,220;$294,229; Mr. Christian: $194,863; Mr. Koonce: $488,070; Mr. Christian: $219,791;$298,036; and Mr. Stutts: $133,980.Heacock: $75,531. The 20092011 amounts reflect both the 20092011 AIP and the 20082010 Performance Grant payouts, and the 20082010 amounts reflect both the 20082010 AIP and 20072009 Performance Grant payouts.

(4)

All amounts in this column are for the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefit under the qualified Pension PlanDPP and nonqualified executive retirement plans. There are no above-market earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation plans. These accruals are not directly in relation to final payout potential, and can vary significantly year over year based on (i) promotions and corresponding changes in salary; (ii) other one-time adjustments to salary or incentive target for market or other reasons; (iii) actual age versus predicted age at retirement; (iv) discount rate used to determine present value of benefit; and (iv)(v) other relevant factors.

141


(5)

All Other Compensation amounts for 20102012 are as follows:

 

Name  Executive
Perquisites(a)
   Life
Insurance
Premiums
   Employee
401(k) Plan
Match(b)
   Company Match
Above IRS
Limits(c)
   Other Cash
Payments(d)
   Total All Other
Compensation(e)
   Executive
Perquisites(a)
   Life
Insurance
Premiums
   Employee
401(k) Plan
Match(b)
   Company Match
Above IRS
Limits(c)
   Total All Other
Compensation
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

  $21,889    $10,307    $2,058    $10,696    $    $44,950    $31,629    $8,646    $2,202    $12,338    $54,815  

Mark F. McGettrick

   15,173     6,131     4,508     7,469          33,281     12,145     6,670     4,583     7,893     31,291  

David A. Christian

   15,491     22,745     5,396     7,559     51,191  

Paul D. Koonce

   17,583     10,441     6,248     6,449          40,721     22,768     11,000     6,190     6,699     46,657  

David A. Christian

   17,037     20,235     5,194     6,547          49,013  

James F. Stutts

   10,425     19,576     3,087     3,108     21,099     57,295  

David A. Heacock

   9,068     5,642     4,706     3,552     22,968  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the appropriate NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power in the year presented.

(a)Unless noted, the amounts in this column for all NEOs are comprised of the following: personal use of company vehicle and financial planning and health and wellness allowance. For Mr. Farrell, the amounts in this column also include personal use of the corporate aircraft. The value of Mr. Farrell’s personal use of the aircraft during 20102012 was $14,549.$23,537. For personal flights, all direct operating costs are included in calculating aggregate incremental cost. Direct operating costs include the following: fuel, airport fees, catering, ground transportation and crew expenses (any food, lodging and other costs). The fixed costs of owning the aircraft and employing the crew are not taken into consideration, as more than 96%97% of the use of the corporate aircraft is for business purposes. The CGN Committee has directed Mr. Farrell to use corporate aircraft for all personal travel whenever it is feasible to do so.

142


(b)Employees initially hired before 2008 who contribute to the 401(k) Plan receive a matching contribution of 50 cents for each dollar contributed up to 6% of compensation (subject to IRS limits) for employees who have less than 20 years of service, and 67 cents for each dollar contributed up to 6% of compensation (subject to IRS limits) for employees who have 20 or more years of service.
(c)Represents each payment of “lost”lost 401(k) Plan matching contribution due to IRS limits.
(d)This amount represents the unused vacation that Mr. Stutts is entitled to due to his retirement on January 1, 2011.
(e)For 2010, dividends paid on outstanding restricted stock are not included in All Other Compensation as the value of the dividends is factored into the grant date fair value of the restricted stock.

GRANTSOF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table provides information about stock awards and non-equity incentive awards granted to the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2010.2012.

 

Name  

Grant

Date(1)

  

Grant

Approval

Date(1)

  Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
   

All Other
Stock

Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)

   

Grant Date
Fair Value

of Stock

and Options
Award(1)(4)

 
      Threshold
($)
   

Target

($)

   

Maximum

($)

     

Thomas F. Farrell II

              

2010 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

      $0    $420,000    $840,000      

2010 Performance Grant(3)

      $0     980,000     1,960,000      

2010 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2010  1/21/2010         26,161    $979,991  

Executive Restricted Stock Grant(5)

  12/17/2010  12/16/2010                  28,000    $1,184,680  

Mark F. McGettrick

              

2010 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

      $0     299,414     598,828      

2010 Performance Grant(3)

      $0     414,000     828,000      

2010 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2010  1/21/2010                  11,051    $413,970  

Paul D. Koonce

              

2010 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

      $0     380,894     761,787      

2010 Performance Grant(3)

      $0     478,125     956,250      

2010 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2010  1/21/2010                  12,764    $478,139  

David A. Christian

              

2010 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

      $0     249,487     498,974      

2010 Performance Grant(3)

      $0     225,250     450,500      

2010 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2010  1/21/2010                  6,013    $225,247  

James F. Stutts

              

2010 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

      $0     144,480     288,960      

2010 Performance Grant(3)

      $0     178,500     357,000      

2010 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2010  1/21/2010                  4,765    $178,497  
Name  

Grant

Date(1)

  Grant
Approval
Date(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
   

Grant Date
Fair Value

of Stock and
Options
Award(1)(4)

 
      Threshold   Target   Maximum     

Thomas F. Farrell II

              

2012 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

      $0    $482,899    $965,797      

2012 Cash Performance Grant(3)

       0     1,027,600     2,055,200      

2012 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2012  1/19/2012                  20,380    $1,027,602  

Mark F. McGettrick

              

2012 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

       0     313,402     626,804      

2012 Cash Performance Grant(3)

       0     486,944     973,888      

2012 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2012  1/19/2012         9,657     486,944  

Executive Restricted Stock Grant(5)

  12/20/2012  12/17/2012                  21,949     1,145,757  

David A. Christian

              

2012 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

       0     294,901     589,802      

2012 Cash Performance Grant(3)

       0     357,485     714,970      

2012 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2012  1/19/2012         7,090     357,495  

Executive Restricted Stock Grant(5)

  12/20/2012  12/17/2012                  15,505     809,410  

Paul D. Koonce

              

2012 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

       0     388,538     777,076      

2012 Cash Performance Grant(3)

       0     526,129     1,052,258      

2012 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2012  1/19/2012         10,435     526,137  

Executive Restricted Stock Grant(5)

  12/20/2012  12/17/2012                  23,715     1,237,966  

David A. Heacock

              

2012 Annual Incentive Plan(2)

       0     145,437     290,873      

2012 Cash Performance Grant(3)

       0     117,650     235,300      

2012 Restricted Stock Grant(4)

  2/1/2012  1/19/2012                  2,333     117,665  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power in the year presented.

(1)

On January 21, 2010,19, 2012, the CGN Committee approved the 20102012 long-term incentive compensation awards for Dominion officers, which consisted of a restricted stock grant and a cash performance grant. The 20102012 restricted stock award was granted on February 1, 2010.2012. Under the Dominion 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, fair market value is defined as the closing price of Dominion common stock ason the date of the lastgrant or, if that day is not a trading day, on which the stock is tradedmost recent trading day immediately preceding the date of grant. The grant date fair market value for the February 1, 20102012 restricted stock grant was $37.46$50.42 per share, which was Dominion’s closing stock price on January 29, 2010. For the award to Mr. Farrell on December 17, 2010, the grant date fair market value was $42.31 per share, which was Dominion’s closing price on December 16, 2010.February 1, 2012.

(2)

Amounts represent the range of potential payouts under the 20102012 AIP. Actual amounts paid under the 20102012 AIP are found in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. Under Dominion’s AIP, officers are eligible for an annual performance-based award. The

142


CGN Committee establishes target awards for each NEO based on his salary level and expressed as a percentage of the individual NEO’s base salary. The target award is the amount of cash that will be paid if the plan is fully funded and payout goals are achieved. For the 20102012 AIP, funding was based on the achievement of consolidated operating earnings goals with the maximum funding capped at 200%, as explained under the Annual Incentive Plan section of the CD&A.

(3)

Amounts represent the range of potential payouts under the 20102012 performance grant of the long-term incentive program.LTIP. Payouts can range from 0% to 200% of the target award. Awards will be paid by March 15, 20122014 depending on the achievement of performance goals for the two-year period ending December 31, 2011.2013. The amount earned will depend on the level of achievement of two performance metrics: TSR—50% and ROIC—50%. TSR measures Dominion’s share performance for the two-year period ended December 31, 20112013 relative to the TSR of a groupthe companies that are listed as members of industry peers selected by the CGN Committee.Philadelphia Stock Exchange Utility Index as of the end of the performance period. ROIC goal achievement will be scored against 20102012 and 20112013 budget goals. Due to his retirement on January 1, 2011, any payout of Mr. Stutts’ 2010 performance grant will be pro-rated based on his months of service during the performance period.

  The performance grant is forfeited in its entirety if an officer voluntarily terminates employment or is terminated with cause before the vesting date. The grants have pro-rated vesting for retirement, termination without cause, death or disability. In the case of retirement, pro-rated vesting will not occur if the CEO (or, for the CEO, the CGN Committee) determines the officer’s retirement is detrimental to the company. Payout for an officer who retires or whose employment is terminated without cause, is made following the end of the performance period so that the officer is rewarded only to the extent the performance goals are achieved. In the case of death or disability, payout is made as soon as possible to facilitate the administration of the officer’s estate or financial planning. The payout amount will be the greater of the officer’s target award or an amount based on the predicted performance used for compensation cost disclosure purposes in Dominion’s financial statements.

  In the event of a change in control, the performance grant is vested in its entirety and payout of the performance grant will occur as soon as administratively feasible following the change in control date at an amount that is the greater of an officer’s target award or an amount based on the predicted performance used for compensation cost disclosure purposes in Dominion’s financial statements.

(4)

The 20102012 restricted stock grant of the long-term incentive program fully vests at the end of three years. The restricted stock grant is forfeited in its entirety if an officer voluntarily terminates employment or is terminated with cause before the vesting date. The restricted stock grant provides for pro-ratapro-rated vesting if an officer retires, dies, becomes disabled, is terminated without cause, or if there is a change in control. In the case of retirement, pro-rated vesting will not occur if the CEO (or for the

143


CEO, the CGN Committee) determines the officer’s retirement is detrimental to Dominion.the company. In the event of a change in control, pro-rated vesting is provided as of the change in control date, and full vesting if an officer’s employment is terminated, or constructively terminated by the successor entity following the change in control date but before the scheduled vesting date. Dividends on the restricted shares are paid during the restricted period at the same rate declared by Dominion for all shareholders. Due to his retirement on January 1, 2011, Mr. Stutts became vested in a pro-rata portion of 1,455 shares of his 2010 restricted stock grant in accordance with the terms of the award agreement.

(5)

On December 16, 2010,17, 2012, the CGN Committee awarded Mr. Farrell 28,000 shares of restricted stock to Messrs. McGettrick, Christian and Koonce for strategic and retention purposes. Mr. McGettrick received 21,949 shares, Mr. Christian received 15,505 and Mr. Koonce received 23,715 shares (These NEOs perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. These share amounts reflect only the applicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power in the year presented). The grant date was December 17, 201020, 2012 and the shares will fully vest on December 17,20, 2015 (Vesting Date), provided Mr. Farrell remainsthey each remain employed until that date. Mr. FarrellThe officer will forfeit the restricted stock grant if his employment with Dominion terminates prior to the vesting dateVesting Date for any reason other than a change in control, death or disability. In the event of a change in control, death or disability, the restricted shares are subject to vesting on a pro-rated basis. The fair market value for these retention grants was $52.20 per share, which was Dominion’s closing stock price on December 20, 2012. Dividends on the restricted shares are paid during the restricted period at the same rate declared by Dominion for all shareholders. Dividends on these shares will be reinvested and the resulting shares will also maintain a restricted status throughout the term of the grant. To the extent the officer remains an employee of Dominion or a Dominion Company, net shares of vested restricted stock under each agreement must be retained for two years following the Vesting Date unless the officer dies or becomes disabled.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table summarizes equity awards made to NEOs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2010.2012. There were no unexercised or unexercisable option awards outstanding for any NEOs as of December 31, 2010.2012.

 

Name

  Stock Awards 
  Stock Awards 

Name

Number of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested

(#)

 

Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested(1)

($)

   Number of
Shares or Units of
Stock that Have
Not Vested (#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested(1)($)
 
   20,568(2)  $878,665     27,431(2)  $1,420,926  
   23,877(3)   1,020,025     23,601(3)   1,222,532  
   26,161(4)   1,117,598     20,380(4)   1,055,684  
   28,000(5)   1,196,160     31,839(5)   1,649,260  

Mark F. McGettrick

   8,447(2)   360,856     11,011(2)   570,370  
   9,806(3)   418,912     10,526(3)   545,247  
   11,051(4)   472,099     9,657(4)   500,233  

Paul D. Koonce

   9,366(2)   400,116  
   10,873(3)   464,495  
   12,764(4)   545,278     21,949(6)   1,136,958  

David A. Christian

   4,217(2)   180,150     6,122(2)   317,120  
   4,896(3)   209,157     6,971(3)   361,098  
   6,013(4)   256,875     7,090(4)   367,262  

James F. Stutts(6)

   2,571(2)   109,833  
   15,505(6)   803,159  

Paul D. Koonce

   12,393(2)   641,957  
   2,984(3)   127,476     10,662(3)   552,292  
   4,765(4)   203,561     10,435(4)   540,533  
   23,715(6)   1,228,437  

David A. Heacock

   2,826(2)   146,387  
   2,702(3)   139,964  
   2,333(4)   120,849  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. CompensationAmounts for the NEOs listed in the table reflectsreflect only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power forin the year presented.

 

(1)(1)

The market value is based on closing stock price of $42.72$51.80 on December 31, 2010, which was the last day of Dominion’s fiscal year on which Dominion stock was traded.2012.

(2)

Shares scheduled to vest on AprilFebruary 1, 2011.2013.

(3)

Shares scheduled to vest on February 1, 2012.2014.

(4)

Shares scheduled to vest on February 1, 2013.2015.

(5)

Shares scheduled to vest on December 17, 2015. Amount includes dividends reinvested into additional shares that are restricted and subject to the same terms and conditions of the underlying restricted stock grant.

(6)

Upon his retirementShares scheduled to vest on January 1, 2011, Mr. Stutts’ outstandingDecember 20, 2015. Amount includes dividends reinvested into additional shares that are restricted and subject to the same terms and conditions of the underlying restricted stock awards vested in accordance with the terms of the award agreements.grant.

 

144   143

 


 

 

OPTION EXERCISESAND STOCK VESTED

The following table provides information about the value realized by NEOs during the year ended December 31, 20102012 on vested restricted stock awards. There were no option exercises by NEOs in 2010.2012.

 

  Stock Awards 
Name  

Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting

(#)

   

Value
Realized on
Vesting

($)

   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
   Value
Realized on
Vesting
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

   18,773    $785,275     25,037    $1,262,366  

Mark F. McGettrick

   7,710     322,509     9,770     492,603  

David A. Christian

   4,985     251,344  

Paul D. Koonce

   8,549     357,605     10,557     532,284  

David A. Christian

   3,849     161,004  

James F. Stutts

   9,304     362,468  

David A. Heacock

   2,341     118,033  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power forin the year presented.

PENSION BENEFITS

The following table shows the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits payable to NEOs, together with the number of years of benefit service credited to each NEO, under the plans listed in the table. Values are computed as of December 31, 2010,2012, using the same interest rate and mortality assumptions used in determining the aggregate pension obligations disclosed in Dominion’s financial statements. The years of credited service and the present value of accumulated benefits used in the table below were determined by ourthe plan actuaries, using the appropriate accrued service, and pay and other assumptions similar to those used for accounting and disclosure purposes. Please refer toActuarial Assumptions Used to Calculate Pension Benefitsfor detailed information regarding these assumptions.

 

Name Plan Name  Number of
Years Credited
Service(1)
   Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit(2)
   Plan Name  Number of
Years
Credited
Service(1)
   Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit(2)
 

Thomas F. Farrell II

 Pension Plan   15.00    $164,027    Dominion Pension Plan   17.00    $299,495  
 Benefit Restoration Plan   26.00     1,983,467    Benefit Restoration Plan   28.00     3,079,682  
 Supplemental Retirement Plan   26.00     3,291,133    Supplemental Retirement Plan   28.00     4,027,674  

Mark F. McGettrick

 Pension Plan   26.50     406,415    Dominion Pension Plan   28.50     659,443  
 Benefit Restoration Plan   30.00     2,244,665    Benefit Restoration Plan   30.00     3,049,238  
 Supplemental Retirement Plan   30.00     2,284,161    Supplemental Retirement Plan   30.00     3,136,378  

David A. Christian

  Dominion Pension Plan   28.50     965,441  
  Benefit Restoration Plan   28.50     1,930,290  
  Supplemental Retirement Plan   28.50     2,567,957  

Paul D. Koonce

 Pension Plan   12.00     305,759    Dominion Pension Plan   14.00     559,634  
 Benefit Restoration Plan   12.00     453,179    Benefit Restoration Plan   14.00     753,813  
 Supplemental Retirement Plan   12.00     2,133,063    Supplemental Retirement Plan   14.00     3,295,194  

David A. Christian

 Pension Plan   26.50     572,903  

David A. Heacock

  Dominion Pension Plan   25.50     697,260  
 Benefit Restoration Plan   26.50     1,250,127    Benefit Restoration Plan   25.50     487,554  
 Supplemental Retirement Plan   26.50     1,717,741    Supplemental Retirement Plan   25.50     663,178  

James F. Stutts(3)

 Pension Plan   12.75     230,285  
 Benefit Restoration Plan   21.00     587,375  
 Supplemental Retirement Plan   21.00     728,642  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power forin the year presented.

(1)

Years of credited service shown in this column for the DPP are actual years accrued by an NEO from his date of participation to December 31, 2010.2012. Service for the Benefit Restoration PlanBRP and the Supplemental Retirement PlanESRP is the NEO’s actual credited service as of December 31, 20102012 plus any potential total credited service to the plan maximum, including any extra years of credited service granted to Messrs. Farrell McGettrick and StuttsMcGettrick by the CGN Committee for the purpose of calculating benefits under these plans. Please refer to the narrative below and under Dominion Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, Dominion Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control and Additional Post-Employment Benefits for NEOs for information about the requirements for receiving extra years of credited service and the amount credited, if any, for each NEO.

(2)

The amounts in this column are based on actuarial assumptions that all of the NEOs would retire at the earliest age they become eligible for unreduced benefits, which is (i) age 60 for Messrs. Farrell, Koonce, Christian and Christian,Heacock, and (ii) age 55 for Mr. McGettrick (when he would be treated as age 60 based on his five additional years of credited age) and (iii) age 66 for Mr. Stutts (his current age). In addition, for purposes of calculating the BRP benefits for Messrs. Farrell McGettrick and Stutts,McGettrick, the amounts reflect additional credited years of service granted to them pursuant to their agreements with the company (see Additional Post-Employment Benefits for NEOs below)Dominion Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan). If the amounts in this column did not include the additional years of credited service, the present value of the Benefit Restoration PlanBRP benefit would be $983,742$1,440,225 lower for Mr. Farrell $1,229,856and $1,451,322 lower for Mr. McGettrick, and $365,298 lower for Mr. Stutts.McGettrick. DPP and ESRP benefits amounts are not augmented by the additional service credit assumptions.

(3)

Mr. Stutts retired on January 1, 2011. He will begin receiving his DPP, BRP and ESRP benefits in 2011.

 

144   145

 


 

 

Dominion Pension Plan

The Dominion Pension PlanDPP is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. All of the NEOs participate in the Pension Plan.DPP. The Pension PlanDPP provides unreduced retirement benefits at termination of employment at or after age 65 or, with three years of service, at age 60. A participant who has attained age 55 with three years of service may elect early retirement benefits at a reduced amount. If a participant retires between ages 55 and 60, the benefit is reduced 0.25% per month for each month after age 58 and before age 60, and reduced 0.50% per month for each month between ages 55 and 58. All of the NEOs have more than three years of service.

The Pension PlanDPP basic benefit is calculated using a formula based on (1) age at retirement; (2) final average earnings; (3) estimated Social Security benefits; and (4) credited service. Final average earnings are the average of the participant’s 60 highest consecutive months of base pay during the last 120 months worked. Final average earnings do not include compensation payable under the AIP, the value of equity awards, gains from the exercise of stock options, long-term cash incentive awards, perquisites or any other form of compensation other than base pay.

Credited service is measured in months, up to a maximum of 30 years of credited service. The estimated Social Security benefit taken into account is the assumed Social Security benefit payable starting at age 65 or actual retirement date, if later, assuming that the participant has no further employment after leaving Dominion. These factors are then applied in a formula.

The formula has different percentages for credited service through December 31, 2000 and on and after January 1, 2001. The benefit is the sum of the amounts from the following two formulas.

 

For Credited Servicecredited service through December 31, 2000:

2.03%times Final

Average Earningstimes Credited

Credited Service before��before 2001

 Minus  

2.00%times estimated

Social Security benefittimes

Credited Service

before 2001

For Credited Servicecredited service on or after January 1, 20012001:

1.80%times Final

Average Earningstimes Credited

Credited Service after 2000

 Minus  

1.50%times estimated

Social Security benefittimes

Credited Service after 2000

Credited Serviceservice is limited to a total of 30 years for all parts of the formula and Credited Servicecredited service after 2000 is limited to 30 years minus Credited Servicecredited service before 2001.

Benefit payment options are (1) a single life annuity or (2) a choice of a 50%, 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity. A Social Security leveling option is available with any of the benefit forms. The normal form of benefit is a single life annuity for unmarried participants and a 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. All of the payment options are actuarially equivalent in value to the single life annuity. The Social Security leveling option pays a larger benefit equal to the estimated Social Security benefit until the participant is age 62 and then reduced payments after age 62.

The DPP also includes a special retirement account, which is in addition to the pension benefit. The special retirement account is credited with 2% of base pay each month as well as interest

based on the 30-year Treasury bond rate set annually (4.19%(3.18% in 2010)2012). The special retirement account can be paid in a lump sum or paid in the form of an annuity benefit.

A participant becomes vested in his or her benefit after completing three years of service. A vested participant who terminates employment before age 55 can start receiving benefit payments calculated using terminated vested reduction factors at any time after attaining age 55. If payments begin before age 65, then the following reduction factors for the portion of the benefits earned after 2000 apply: age 64 – 9%; age 63 – 16%; age 62 – 23%; age 61 – 30%; age 60 – 35%; age 59 – 40%; age 58 – 44%; age 57 – 48%; age 56 – 52%; and age 55 – 55%.

The Internal Revenue CodeIRC limits the amount of compensation that may be included in determining pension benefits under qualified pension plans. For 2010,2012, the compensation limit was $245,000.$250,000. The Internal Revenue CodeIRC also limits the total annual benefit that may be provided to a participant under a qualified defined benefit plan. For 2010,2012, this limitation was the lesser of (i) $195,000$200,000 or (ii) the average of the participant’s compensation during the three consecutive years in which the participant had the highest aggregate compensation.

Dominion Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

The BRP is a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan designed to make up for benefit reductions under the DPP due to the limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.IRC.

A Dominion employee is eligible to participate in the BRP if (1) he or she is a member of management or a highly compensated employee, (2) his or her DPP benefit is or has been limited by the Internal Revenue CodeIRC compensation or benefit limits, and (3) he or she has been designated as a participant by the CGN Committee. A participant remains a participant until he or she ceases to be eligible for any reason other than retirement or until his or her status as a participant is revoked by the CGN Committee.

Upon retirement, a participant’s BRP benefit is calculated using the same formula (except that the IRC salary limit is not applied) used to determine the participant’s default annuity form of benefit under the DPP (single life annuity for unmarried participants and 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants), and then subtracting the benefit the participant is entitled to receive under the DPP. To accommodate the enactment of Internal Revenue CodeIRC Section 409A, the portion of a participant’s BRP benefit that had accrued as of December 31, 2004 is frozen, but the calculation of the overall restoration benefit is not changed.

The restoration benefit is generally paid in the form of a single lump sum cash payment. However, a participant may elect to receive a single life or 50% or 100% joint and survivor annuity for the portion of his or her benefit that accrued prior to 2005. For the portion of his or her benefit that accrued in 2005 or later, a participant may also elect to receive a 75% joint and survivor annuity. The lump sum calculation includes an amount approximately equivalent to the amount of taxes the participant will owe on the lump sum payment so that the participant will have sufficient funds, on an after-tax basis, to purchase an annuity contract.

A participant who terminates employment before he or she is eligible for benefits under the DPP generally is not entitled to a restoration benefit. Messrs. Farrell and McGettrick have been granted age and service credits for purposes of calculating their DPP and BRP benefits. Per Mr. Farrell,Farrell’s letter agreement, he was granted 25 years of service when he reached age 55 and will continue to accrue service as long as he remains employed. At age 60, benefits will be calculated based on 30 years of service, if he remains employed. Mr. McGettrick, having attained age 55,50, has earned benefits based on 25 years of service; if he remains

 

 

146   145

 


 

 

employed until age 60, benefits will be calculated based on 30 years of service. Mr. McGettrick, having attained age 50, has earned benefits calculated based on five additional years of age and service. Mr. Stutts, having attained age 65, has earned benefits based on 20 years of service. For each of these NEOs, the additional years of service count for determining both the amount of benefits and the eligibility to receive them. For additional information regarding service credits, seeAdditional Post-Employment Benefits for NEOsDominion Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan.underPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

If a vested participant dies when he or she is retirement eligible (on or after age 55), the participant’s beneficiary will receive the restoration benefit in a single lump sum payment. If a participant dies while employed but before he or she has attained age 55 and the participant is married at the time of death, the participant’s spouse will receive a restoration benefit calculated in the same way as the 50% Qualified Pre-Retirement Survivor Annuityqualified pre-retirement survivor annuity payable under the Pension PlanDPP and paid in a lump sum payment.

Dominion Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan

The ESRP is a nonqualified defined benefit plan that provides for an annual retirement benefit equal to 25% of a participant’s final cash compensation (base salary plus target annual incentive award) payable for a period of 10 years or, for certain participants designated by the CGN Committee, for the participant’s lifetime. To accommodate the enactment of Internal Revenue CodeIRC Section 409A, the portion of a participant’s ESRP benefit that had accrued as of December 31, 2004 is frozen, but the calculation of the overall benefit is not changed.

A Dominion employee is eligible to participate in the ESRP if (1) he or she is a member of management or a highly-compensatedhighly compensated employee, and (2) he or she has been designated as a participant by the CGN Committee. A participant remains a participant until he or she ceases to be eligible for any reason other than retirement or until his or her status as a participant is revoked by the CGN Committee.

A participant is entitled to the full ESRP benefit if he or she separates from service with Dominion after reaching age 55 and achieving 60 months of service. An officer who becomes a participant on or after December 1, 2006, must have reached age 55 and completed 60 months of service as an officer in order to be entitled to a full ESRP benefit. A participant who separates from service with Dominion with at least 60 months of service but who has not yet reached age 55 is entitled to a reduced, pro-rated retirement benefit. A participant who separates from service with Dominion with fewer than 60 months of service is generally not entitled to an ESRP benefit unless the participant separated from service on account of disability or death.

The ESRP benefit is generally paid in the form of a single lump sum cash payment. However, a participant may elect to receive the portion of his or her benefit that had accrued as of December 31, 2004 in monthly installments. For any new participants, the ESRP benefit must be paid in the form of a single lump sum cash payment. The lump sum calculation includes an amount approximately equivalent to the amount of taxes the participant will owe on the lump sum payment so that the participant will have sufficient funds, on an after-tax basis, to purchase a 10-year or lifetime annuity contract.

All of the NEOs except Mr. Koonce are currently entitled to a full ESRP retirement benefit. If Mr. Koonce terminates employment before he attainsattaining age 55, he will receive a pro-rated ESRP

benefit. Based on determinations made by the CGN Committee,terms of their individual letter agreements, Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick and Koonce will receive an ESRP benefit calculated as a lifetime benefit, andbenefit. Mr. McGettrick will receivehas earned five years of additional age and service credit for purposes of computing his retirement benefits and eligibility for benefits under the ESRP, benefits calculatedlong-term incentive grants, and retiree medical and life insurance plans as a lifetime benefit provided he remainshas met the requirement of remaining employed with Dominion until attainment ofhe attained age 55.50. Under his letter agreement, Mr. Christian will receive ESRP benefits calculated as a lifetime benefit provided he remains employed with Dominion until attainment of age 60. As consideration for this benefit, Mr. Christian has agreed not to compete with Dominion for a two-year period following retirement. This agreement ensures that his knowledge and services will not be available to competitors for two years following his retirement date.

Actuarial Assumptions Used to Calculate Pension Benefits

Actuarial assumptions used to calculate DPP benefits are prescribed by the terms of the DPP based on Internal Revenue CodeIRC and Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationPBGC requirements. The present value of the accumulated benefit is calculated using actuarial and other factors as determined by the plan actuaries and approved by Dominion. Actuarial assumptions used for the December 31, 20102012 benefit calculations shown in thePension Benefits table useinclude a discount rate of 5.90%4.40% to determine the present value of the future benefit obligations for the DPP, BRP and ESRP and a lump sum interest rate of 5.15%3.65% to estimate the lump sum values of BRP and ESRP benefits. Each NEO is assumed to retire at the earliest age at which he is projected to become eligible for full, unreduced pension benefits. Beginning with the 2009 calculations, for purposes of estimating future eligibility for unreduced DPP and ESRP benefits, the effect of future service is considered. Each NEO is assumed to commence DPP payments at the same age as BRP payments. The longevity assumption used to determine the present value of benefits is the same assumption used for financial reporting of the DPP liabilities, with no assumed mortality before retirement age. Assumed mortality after retirement is based on tables from the Society of Actuaries’ RP-2000 study, projected from 2000 to 2010a point five years beyond the calculation date (this year, to 2017) with 50%100% of the Scale AA factors, and further adjusted for Dominion experience by using an age set-forward factor. For BRP and ESRP benefits, other actuarial assumptions include an assumed tax rate of 40%42%. BRP and ESRP benefits are assumed to be paid as lump sums; pension plan benefits are assumed to be paid as annuities.

The discount rate for calculating lump sum BRP and ESRP payments at the time an officer terminates employment is selected by Dominion’s Administrative Benefits Committee and adjusted periodically. For 2010,year 2012, a 5.28%5.09% discount rate was used to determine the lump sum payout amounts. For 2010 and later years, theThe discount rate for each year will be based on a rolling average of the blended rate published by the Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationPBGC in October of the previous five years.

147


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

Name  

Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY*

(as of 12/31/2010)

   

Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE

(as of 12/31/2010)

  

Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY

(as of 12/31/2012)*

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
(as of 12/31/2012)

 

Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE

(as of 12/31/2012)

 

Thomas F. Farrell II

  $1,305    $3,900   $   $   $  

Mark F. McGettrick

   39,837     354,081              

David A. Christian

  256        15,891  

Paul D. Koonce

   86,965     987,292    22,404        1,146,855  

David A. Christian

   636     14,957  

James F. Stutts

   32,207     250,851  

David A. Heacock

            

*No preferential earnings are paid and therefore no earnings from these plans are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power forin the year presented.

*No preferential earnings are paid and therefore no earnings from these plans are included in the Summary Compensation Table.

146


At this time, Dominion does not offer any nonqualified elective deferred compensation plans to its officers or other employees. TheNonqualified Deferred Compensation table reflects, in aggregate, the plan balances for two former plans offered to Dominion officers and other highly compensated employees: Dominion Resources, Inc. Executives’the Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan (Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan) and Dominion Resources, Inc. Security Option Plan (Frozen DSOP),the Frozen DSOP, which were frozen as of December 31, 2004. Although the Frozen DSOP was an option plan rather than a deferred compensation plan, Dominion is including information regarding the plan and any balances in this table to make full disclosure about possible future payments to officers under Dominion’s employee benefit plans.

Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan

The Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan includes amounts previously deferred from one of the following categories of compensation: (i) salary; (ii) bonus; (iii) vesting restricted stock,stock; and (iv) gains from stock option exercises. The plan also provided for company contributions of lost company 401(k) Plan match contributions and transfers from several CNG deferred compensation plans. The Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan offers 2827 investment funds for the plan balances, including a Dominion Resources Stock Fund. Participants may change investment elections on any business day. Any vested restricted stock and gains from stock option exercises that were deferred were automatically allocated to the Dominion Resources Stock Fund and this allocation cannot be changed. Earnings are calculated based on the performance of the underlying investment fund.

The NEOs invested in the following funds withhad rates of returns for 20102012 as follows: Vanguard 500 Index Fund, 14.9%; Dominion Resources Stock Fund, 14.47%1.66%; and Dominion Fixed Income Fund, 4.19%3.31%. The Vanguard 500 Index Fund has the same rate of return as the corresponding publicly available mutual fund.

The Dominion Fixed Income Fund is an investment option that provides a fixed rate of return each year based on a formula that is tied to the adjusted federal long-term rate published by the IRS in November prior to the beginning of the year. Dominion’s Asset Management Committee determines the rate based on its estimate of the rate of return on Dominion assets in the trust for the Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan.

The default Benefit Commencement Date is February 28 after the year in which the participant retires, but the participant may select a different Benefit Commencement Date in accordance with the plan. Participants may change their Benefit Commencement Date election; however, a new election must be made

at least six months before an existing Benefit Commencement Date. Withdrawals less than six months prior to an existing Benefit Commencement Date are subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty. Account balances must be fully paid out no later than the February 28 that is 10 calendar years after a participant retires or becomes disabled. If a participant retires from Dominion, he or she may continue to defer an account balance provided that the total balance is distributed by this deadline. In the event of termination of employment for reasons other than death, disability or retirement before an elected Benefit Commencement Date, benefit payments will be distributed in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable. Hardship distributions, prior to an elected Benefit Commencement Date, are available under certain limited circumstances.

Participants may elect to have their benefit paid in a lump sum payment or equal annual installments over a period of whole years from one to 10 years. Participants have the ability to change their distribution schedule for benefits under the plan by giving six months notice to the plan administrator. Once a participant begins receiving annual installment payments, the participant can make a one-time election to either (1) receive the remaining account balance in the form of a lump sum distribution or (2) change the remaining installment payment period. Any election must be approved by the company before it is effective. All distributions are made in cash with the exception of the Deferred Restricted Stock Account and the Deferred Stock Option Account, which are distributed in the form of Dominion common stock.

Frozen DSOP

The Frozen DSOP enabled employees to defer all or a portion of their salary and bonus and receive options on various mutual funds. Participants also received lost company matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan in the form of options under this plan. DSOP options can be exercised at any time before their expiration date. On exercise, the participant receives the excess of the value, if any, of the underlying mutual funds over the strike price. The participant can currently choose among options on 27 mutual funds, and there is not a Dominion stock alternative or a fixed income fund. Participants may change options among the mutual funds on any business day. Benefits grow/decline based on the total return of the mutual funds selected. Any options that expire do not have any value. Options expire under the following terms:

Ÿ 

Options expire on the last day of the 120th month after retirement or disability;

Ÿ 

Options expire on the last day of the 24th month after the participant’s death (while employed);

Ÿ 

Options expire on the last day of the 12th month after the participant’s severance;

Ÿ 

Options expire on the 90th day after termination with cause; and

Ÿ 

Options expire on the last day of the 120th month after severance following a change in control.

The NEOsNEO participating in the Frozen DSOP held options on the following publicly available mutual funds,fund, Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index, which had ratesa rate of return for 2010 as noted.2012 of 1.95%.

 

FundRate of Return

Vanguard Developed Markets Index

148
  8.5%

Vanguard Extended Market Index

27.4%

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index

3.9%

Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index

30.7%

Vanguard US Value Fund

13.8%

Artisan International Investor

5.9%

Dodge & Cox Balanced

12.2%

Harbor International Fund

12.0%

Janus Growth & Income Fund

8.6%

Perkins Mid Cap Value Investor

14.8% 


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL

Under certain circumstances, Dominion provides benefits to eligible employees upon termination of employment, including a termination of employment involving a change in control of the

147


company,Dominion, that are in addition to termination benefits for other employees in the same situation.

Change in Control

As discussed in theEmployee and Executive Benefits section of the CD&A, Dominion has entered into an Employment Continuity Agreement with each of its officers, including the NEOs. Each agreement has a three-year term and is automatically extended annually for an additional year, unless cancelled by Dominion.

The Employment Continuity Agreements require two triggers for the payment of most benefits:

Ÿ 

There must be a change in control; and

Ÿ 

The executive must either be terminated without cause, or terminate his or her employment with the surviving company after a “constructiveconstructive termination. Constructive termination means the executive’s salary, incentive compensation or job responsibility is reduced after a change in control or the executive’s work location is relocated more than 50 miles without his or her consent.

For purposes of the Employment Continuity Agreements, a change in control will occur if (i) any person or group becomes a beneficial owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of Dominion voting stock or (ii) as a direct or indirect result of, or in connection with, a cash tender or exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets, or contested election, the directors constituting the Dominion Board before any such transaction cease to represent a majority of Dominion’s or its successor’s Board within two years after the last of such transactions.

If an executive’s employment following a change in control is terminated without cause or due to a constructive termination, the executive will become entitled to the following termination benefits:

Ÿ 

Lump sum severance payment equal to three times base salary plus AIP award (determined as the greater of (i) the target annual award for the current year or (ii) the highest actual AIP payout for any one of the three years preceding the year in which the change in control occurs).

Ÿ 

Full vesting of benefits under ESRP and BRP with five years of additional credited age and five years of additional credited service from the change in control date.

Ÿ 

Group-term life insurance. If the officer elects to convert group-term insurance to an individual policy, the company pays the premiums for 12 months.

Ÿ 

Executive life insurance. Premium payments will continue to be paid by Dominion until the earlier of: (1) the fifth anniversary of the termination date, or (2) the later of the 10th anniversary of the policy or the date the officer attains age 64.

Ÿ 

Retiree medical coverage will be determined under the relevant plan with additional age and service credited as provided under an officer’s letter of agreement (if any) and including five additional years credited to age and five additional years credited to service.

Ÿ 

Outplacement services for one year (up to $25,000).

Ÿ 

If any payments are classified as “excessexcess parachute payments”payments for purposes of Internal Revenue CodeIRC Section 280G and the

executive incurs the excise tax, Dominion will pay the executive an amount equal to the 280G excise tax plus a gross-up multiple.

In January 2013, the CGN Committee approved the elimination of the excise tax gross up provision included in the Employment Continuity Agreement for any new officer elected after February 1, 2013.

The terms of awards made under the LTIP, rather than the terms of Employment Continuity Agreements, will determine the vesting of each award in the event of a change in control. These provisions are described in theLong-Term Incentive Program section of the CD&A.&A and footnotes to theGrants of Plan-Based Awards table.

Additional Post-Employment BenefitsOther Post Employment Benefit for NEOsMr. Farrell

Under the terms of letter agreements with the NEOs, the following benefits are available in addition to the benefits described above. These benefits are quantified in the table below to the extent they would be payable if the triggering event set forth in the table occurred on December 31, 2010.

Mr. Farrell. Mr. Farrell has earned a lifetime benefit under the ESRP. For purposes of calculating his benefits under the DPP and BRP, Mr. Farrell has earned 25 years of credited service as he has met the requirement of remaining employed until he attained age 55. He will be credited with 30 years of service if he remains employed until he attains age 60. Mr. Farrell will become entitled to a payment of one times salary upon his retirement as consideration for his agreement not to compete with Dominion for a two-year period following retirement. This agreement ensures that his knowledge and services will not be available to competitors for two years following his retirement date.

Mr. McGettrick. Mr. McGettrick will earn a lifetime benefit under the ESRP if he remains employed until he attains age 55. He has earned five years of additional age and service credit for purposes of computing his retirement benefits and eligibility for benefits under the ESRP, long-term incentive grants, and retiree medical and life insurance plans as he has met the requirement of remaining employed until he attained age 50. If Mr. McGettrick terminates employment before he attains age 55, he will be deemed to have retired for purposes of determining his vesting credit under the terms of his restricted stock and performance grant awards.

Mr. Koonce. Mr. Koonce earned a lifetime benefit under the ESRP in early 2010 upon his attainment of age 50. If Mr. Koonce leaves Dominion before age 55, he will be entitled to a pro-rated ESRP benefit.

Mr. Christian. Mr. Christian will earn a lifetime benefit under the ESRP if he remains employed with Dominion until he attains age 60. As consideration for this benefit, Mr. Christian has agreed not to compete with Dominion for a two-year period following retirement. This agreement ensures that his knowledge and services will not be available to competitors for two years following his retirement date.

Mr. Stutts. Mr. Stutts joined Dominion mid-career in 1997. At the time of his employment, Dominion agreed to credit him with 20 years of service (eight additional years) if he remained employed until he attained age 65 for purposes of computing his retirement benefits under the Pension Plan and BRP; he has attained age 65. Mr. Stutts retired effective January 1, 2011.

 

 

148

149

 


 

 

The following table below provides the incremental payments that would be earned by each NEO if his employment had been terminated, or constructively terminated, as of December 31, 2010.2012. These benefits are in addition to retirement benefits that would be payable on any termination of employment. Please refer to thePension Benefits table for information related to the present value of accumulated retirement benefits payable to the NEOs.

Incremental Payments Upon Termination andor Change in Control

 

Name Non-Qualified
Plan Payment
 Restricted
Stock(1)
 Performance
Grant(1)
 Non-Compete
Payments(2)
 Severance
Payments
 Retiree Medical
and Executive
Life Insurance (3)
 Outplacement
Services
 Excise Tax &
Tax Gross-Up
 Total  Non-Qualified
Plan Payment
 Restricted
Stock(1)
 Performance
Grant(1)
 Non-Compete
Payments(2)
 Severance
Payments
 Retiree Medical
and Executive
Life Insurance(3)
 Outplacement
Services
 Excise Tax &
Tax Gross-Up
 Total 

Thomas F. Farrell II(4)

                  

Retirement

     $1,798,614   $468,696   $336,000    $—      $—      $—      $—     $2,603,310    $—     $2,485,126   $491,461   $386,319    $—     $—    $—      $—     $3,362,906  

Death / Disability

      1,818,550    468,696                        2,287,246        3,144,840    491,461                     3,636,301  

Change in Control(5)

  1,170,788    2,413,834    511,304        3,026,016        7,000        7,128,942    588,482    1,873,837    536,139        2,929,365     7,340        5,935,163  

Mark F. McGettrick(4)

                  

Retirement

      742,675    198,000                        940,675        1,055,715    232,886                     1,288,601  

Death / Disability

      1,087,289    232,886                     1,320,175  

Change in Control(5)

      1,697,168    254,058        2,139,402     11,458        4,102,086  

David A. Christian(4)

         

Retirement

      651,237    170,971                     822,208  

Death / Disability

      673,542    170,971                     844,513  

Change in Control(5)

  309,120    509,192    216,000        2,205,244        11,500        3,251,056    375,375    1,197,516    186,514        2,004,106     13,490    1,329,761    5,106,762  

Paul D. Koonce

                  

Termination Without Cause

      830,146    228,669                        1,058,815        1,142,123    251,627                     1,393,750  

Voluntary Termination

                                                                     

Termination With Cause

                                                                     

Death / Disability

      830,146    228,669                        1,058,815        1,176,238    251,627                     1,427,865  

Change in Control(5)

  2,246,648    579,742    249,456        3,084,276    49,330    21,250        6,230,702    2,120,693    1,821,216    274,502        2,781,824   11,102  20,633        7,029,970  

David A. Christian(4)

         

David A. Heacock(4)

         

Retirement

      377,256    107,728                        484,984        268,709    56,267                     324,976  

Change in Control(5)

  1,110,554    268,927    117,522        1,908,890        13,250    1,237,067    4,656,210    756,132    138,584    61,383        1,119,029   75,093  11,765    783,353    2,945,339  

James F. Stutts(4)

         

Retirement

      244,323    85,370                        329,693  

Change in Control(5)

  269,988    196,547    93,130        1,100,127        10,500    586,005    2,256,297  

Note: The NEOs included in this table perform services for more than one subsidiary of Dominion. Compensation for the NEOs listed in the table reflects only the appropriateapplicable portion related to their service for Virginia Power forin the year presented.

 

(1)

Grants made in 2008, 20092010, 2011 and 20102012 under the LTIP vest pro-rataprorated upon termination without cause, death or disability. These grants vest pro-rataprorated upon retirement provided the CEO of Dominion (or in the case of the CEO, the CGN Committee) determines the NEO’s retirement is not detrimental to the company; amounts shown assume this determination was made. However, the December 2010 restricted stock award issued to Mr. Farrell and the December 2012 restricted stock awards issued to Messrs. McGettrick, Christian and Koonce do not vest prorated if the executive is terminated or leaves for any reason other than following change of control, death or disability. The amounts shown in the restricted stock column are based on the closing stock price of $42.72$51.80 on December 31, 2010.2012.

(2)

Pursuant to a letter agreement dated February 28, 2003, Mr. Farrell will be entitled to a special payment of one times salary upon retirement in exchange for a two-year non-compete agreement. Mr. Farrell would not be entitled to this non-compete payment in the event of his death.

(3)

Amounts in this column represent the value of the annual incremental benefit the NEOs would receive for executive life insurance and retiree medical coverage. Mr. McGettrick is eligible for retiree medical and executive life insurance upon any termination due to his letter agreement. Messrs. Farrell Christian and StuttsChristian are entitled to executive life insurance coverage and retiree medical benefit upon any termination since they are retirement eligible and have completed 10 years of service. Mr. Heacock is entitled to executive life insurance coverage since he has reached the age of 55 and has 10 years of service. Mr. Koonce is eligible for retiree medical and executive life insurance upon a change in control. Mr. Heacock is eligible for retiree medical coverage upon a change in control. Mr. Koonce would not be eligible for retiree medical coverage upon a change in control because with an additional 5 years of age credit he would not reach the required retiree medical age of 58. Retiree health benefits have been quantified using assumptions used for financial accounting purposes.

(4)

For the NEOs who are eligible for retirement (Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick, Christian and Heacock), this table above assumes they would retire in connection with any termination event. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated May 2010, Mr. McGettrick would be considered as retired under any termination event.

(5)

Change in control amounts assume that a change in control and a termination or constructive termination takes place on December 31, 2012. The amounts indicated upon a change in control are the incremental amounts attributable to five years of additional age and service credited pursuant to the Employment Continuity Agreements that each NEO would receive over the amounts payable upon a retirement (Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick, Christian, and Stutts) or a voluntary terminationHeacock) or termination without cause (Mr. Koonce). The restricted stock and performance grant amounts represent the value of the awards upon a change in control that is above what would be received upon a retirement or termination.

 

150   149

 


 

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

DOMINION

The information concerning stock ownership by directors, executive officers and five percent beneficial owners contained under the headingsDirectorShare Ownership-Director and Officer Share Ownership andSignificant Shareholders in the 20112013 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.

The information regarding equity securities of Dominion that are authorized for issuance under its equity compensation plans contained under the headingExecutive Compensation-EquityCompensation Plans in the 20112013 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.

VIRGINIA POWER

The table below sets forth as of February 18, 2011,15, 2013, the number of shares of Dominion common stock owned by thedirectors and executive officers of Virginia Power named on the Summary Compensation Table and directors.Table. Dominion owns all of the outstanding common stock of Virginia Power. None of the executive officers or directors own any of the outstanding preferred stock of Virginia Power.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner  Shares   Restricted
Shares
   Total(1)   Shares   

Restricted

Shares

   Total(1) 

Thomas F. Farrell II

   469,137     432,553     901,690     624,714     335,782     960,496  

Mark F. McGettrick

   123,411     86,678     210,089     175,794     113,510     289,304  

Steven A. Rogers

   40,870     17,953     58,823     53,431     11,368     64,799  

David A. Christian

   67,126     41,463     108,589     86,198     68,250     154,448  

David A. Heacock

   28,315     16,240     44,555  

Paul D. Koonce

   90,514     51,748     142,262     69,099     67,754     136,853  

James F. Stutts

   91,096          91,096  

All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)(2)

   869,542     680,341     1,549,883     1,082,890     637,935     1,720,825  

 

(1)

Includes shares as to which individuals will acquire beneficial ownership upon distribution from the Dominion Resources, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan, as well as shares as to which voting and/or investment power is shared with or controlled by another person as follows: Mr. Farrell, 20,000 (shares held jointly); Mr. Rogers, 617669 (shares held in joint tenancy).; all directors and executive officers as a group, 36,138.

(2)

Total does not include shares beneficially owned by James F. Stutts, who retired as of January 1, 2011. Neither any individual director or executive officer, nor all of the directors and executive officers as a group, own more than one percent of Dominion common shares outstanding as of February 18, 2011.15, 2013.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

DOMINION

The information regarding related party transactions required by this item found under the headingRelated Party Transactions, and information regarding director independence found under the headingDirector Independence, in the 20112013 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.

VIRGINIA POWER

Related Party Transactions

Virginia Power’s Board of Directors has adopted the Related Party Guidelines also approved by Dominion’s Board of Directors. These guide-Direc-

linestors. These guidelines were adopted for the purpose of identifying potential conflicts of interest arising out of financial transactions, arrangements and relations between Virginia Power and any related persons. Under the guidelines, a related person is a director, executive officer, director nominee, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of Dominion’s common stock, or any immediate family member of one of the foregoing persons. A related party transaction is any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in excess of $120,000 in which Virginia Power (and/or any of its consolidated subsidiaries) is a party and in which the related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

In determining whether a direct or indirect interest is material, the significance of the information to investors in light of all circumstances is considered. The importance of the interest to the person having the interest, the relationship of the parties to the transaction with each other and the amount involved are also among the factors considered in determining the significance of the information to the investors.

Dominion’s CGN Committee has reviewed certain categories of transactions and determined that transactions between Dominion and a related person that fall within such categories will not result in the related person receiving a direct or indirect material interest. Under the guidelines, such transactions are not deemed related party transactions and therefore not subject to review by the CGN Committee. The categories of excluded transactions include, among other items, compensation and expense reimbursement paid to directors and executive officers in the ordinary course of performing their duties; transactions with other companies where the related party’s only relationship is as an employee, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company’s gross revenues; and charitable contributions which are less than the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charity’s annual receipts. The full text of the guidelines can be found on Dominion’s website at www.dom.com/investors/corporate-governance/pdf/related_party_guidelines.pdf.

Virginia Power collects information about potential related party transactions in its annual questionnaires completed by directors and executive officers. The General Counsel and the Chief Legal Officer reviewManagement reviews the potential related party transactions and assessassesses whether any of the identified transactions constitute a related party transaction. Any identified related party transactions are then reported to Dominion’s CGN Committee. Dominion’s CGN Committee reviews and considers relevant facts and circumstances and determines whether to ratify or approve the related party transactions identified. Dominion’s CGN Committee may only approve or ratify related party transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of Dominion and its shareholders and are in compliance with Virginia Power’s Code of Ethics.

Since January 1, 20102012, there have been no related party transactions involving Virginia Power that were required either to be approved under Virginia Power’s policies or reported under the SEC related party transactions rules.

 

 

150

151

 


 

 

Director Independence

Under NYSE listing standards, Messrs. Farrell, McGettrick and Rogers are not independent as they arewere executive officers of Virginia Power or of its parent company, Dominion. All of Virginia Power’s outstanding common stock is owned by Dominion and therefore, Virginia Power is a “controlled” company under the rules of the NYSE. Because Virginia Power meets the definition of a “controlled company” and has only debt securities and preferred stock listed on the NYSE, it is exempt under Section 303A of the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE Rules from the provisions relating to board committees and the requirement to have a majority of its board be independent.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

DOMINION

The information concerning principal accountingaccountant fees and services contained under the headingFeesAuditors-Fees and Pre-Approval Policy in the 20112013 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.

VIRGINIA POWER

The following table presents fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20102012 and 2009.2011.

 

Type of Fees  2010   2009 
(millions)        

Audit fees

  $1.36    $1.44  

Audit-related fees

          

Tax fees

          

All other fees

          
   $1.36    $1.44  


Type of Fees  2012   2011 
(millions)        

Audit fees

  $1.79    $1.32  

Audit-related fees

          

Tax fees

          

All other fees

          
   $1.79    $1.32  

Audit Fees represent fees of Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of Virginia Power’s annual consolidated financial statements, the review of financial statements included in Virginia Power’s quarterly Form 10-Q reports, and the services that an independent auditor would customarily provide in connection with subsidiary audits, statutory requirements, regulatory filings, and similar engagements for the fiscal year, such as comfort letters, attest services, consents, and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees consist of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Virginia Power’s consolidated financial statements or internal control over financial reporting. This category may include fees related to the performanceBoard of audits and attest services not required by statute or regulations, due diligence related to mergers, acquisitions, and investments, and accounting consultations about the application of GAAP to proposed transactions.

Virginia Power’s boardDirectors has adopted Dominion’sthe Dominion Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policypre-approval policy for its independent auditor’s services and fees and has delegated the execution of this policy to Dominion’s audit committee (DRIthe Dominion Audit Committee).Committee. In accordance with this delegation, each year the DRIDominion Audit Committee pre-approves a schedule that details the services to be provided for the following year and an estimated charge for such services. At its December 20102012 meeting, the DRIDominion Audit Committee approved Virginia Power’s schedule of services and fees for 2011.2013. In accordance with the pre-approval policy, any changes to the pre-approved schedule may be pre-approved by the DRIDominion Audit Committee or a member of this committee.the Dominion Audit Committee.

 

 

152   151

 


Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

 

 

(a) Certain documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference and found on the pages noted.

1. Financial Statements

See Index on page 53.

2. All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or the required information is either not material or is shown in the financial statements or the related notes.

3. Exhibits (incorporated by reference unless otherwise noted)note

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

  Dominion   Virginia
Power
 
2  Purchase and Sale Agreement between Dominion Resources, Inc., Dominion Energy, Inc., Dominion Transmission, Inc. and CONSOL Energy Holdings LLC VI (Exhibit 99.1, Form 8-K filed March 15, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X    
3.1.a  Dominion Resources, Inc. Articles of Incorporation as amended and restated, effective May 20, 2010 (Exhibit 3.1, Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X    
3.1.b  Virginia Electric and Power Company Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as in effect on October 28, 2003March 3, 2011 (Exhibit 3.1,3.1b, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed November 7, 2003,April 29, 2011, File No. 1-2255).     X  
3.2.a  Dominion Resources, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective May 18, 2010December 13, 2011 (Exhibit 3.2,3.1, Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010,December 14, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    
3.2.b  Virginia Electric and Power Company Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective June 1, 2009 (Exhibit 3.1, Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009, File No. 1-2255).     X  
4  Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company agree to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request any other instrument with respect to long-term debt as to which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of either of their total consolidated assets.   X     X  
4.1.a  See Exhibit 3.1.a above.   X    
4.1.b  See Exhibit 3.1.b above.     X  
4.2  Indenture of Mortgage of Virginia Electric and Power Company, dated November 1, 1935, as supplemented and modified by Fifty-Eighth Supplemental Indentures (Exhibit 4(ii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1985, File No. 1-2255); Eighty-First Supplemental Indenture, (Exhibit 4(iii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eighty-FifthNinety-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated Februaryas of July 1, 19972012 (Exhibit 4(i),4.1, Form 8-K10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed February 20, 1997,August 1, 2012, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
4.3Subordinated Note Indenture, dated August 1, 1995 between Virginia Electric and Power Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Bank)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(a), Form S-3 Registration Statement filed January 28, 1997, File No. 333-20561), Form of Second Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.6, Form 8-K filed August 20, 2002, File No. 1-2255).XX
4.4  Form of Senior Indenture, dated June 1, 1998, between Virginia Electric and Power Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(iii), Form S-3 Registration Statement filed February 27, 1998, File No. 333-47119); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 1998 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 12, 1998, File No. 1-2255); Form of Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 1999 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 4, 1999, File No. 1-2255); Form of Third Supplemental Indenture, dated November 1, 1999 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed October 27, 1999, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Fourth and Fifth Supplemental Indentures, dated March 1, 2001 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed March 26, 2001, File No. 1-2255); Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed January 29, 2002, File No. 1-2255); Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed September 11, 2002, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated February 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed February 27, 2003, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Ninth and Tenth Supplemental Indentures, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed December 4, 2003, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, datedXX

152


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
December 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed December 11, 2003, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Twelfth and Thirteenth Supplemental Indentures, dated January 1, 2006 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 12, 2006, File No. 1-2255); Form of Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 1, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed May 16, 2007, File No. 1-2255); Form of Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 10, 2007, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Sixteenth and Seventeenth Supplemental Indentures, dated November 1, 2007 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed November 30, 2007, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 2008 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed April 15, 2008, File No. 1-2255); Form of Nineteenth Supplemental and Amending Indenture, dated November 1, 2008 (ExhibitXX

153


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
(Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 5, 2008, File No. 1-2255); Form of Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2009 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed June 24, 2009, File No. 1-2255); Form of Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2010 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed September 1, 2010, File No. 1-2255); Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 12, 2012, File No. 1-2255); Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2013 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 8, 2013, File No. 1-2255); Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2013 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed January 8, 2013, File No. 1-2255).    
4.54.4  Indenture, Junior Subordinated Debentures, dated December 1, 1997, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)) as supplemented by a First Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 1997 (Exhibit 4.1 and Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-4 Registration Statement filed April 22, 1998, File No. 333-50653); Forms of Second and Third Supplemental Indentures, dated January 1, 2001 (Exhibits 4.6 and 4.13, Form 8-K filed January 12, 2001, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.64.5  Indenture, dated May 1, 1971, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company)) (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-5012); Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 1, 1989 (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-7651); Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 1993 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-8167); Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 1993 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-8167); Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 28, 2000 (Exhibit (4A)(iii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 7, 2000, File No. 1-3196); Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 19, 2001 (Exhibit 4.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed November 7, 2003, File No. 1-3196); Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.74.6  Indenture, dated April 1, 1995, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to United States Trust Company of New York) (Exhibit (4), Certificate of Notification No. 1 filed April 19, 1995, File No. 70-8107); First Supplemental Indenture dated
January 28, 2000 (Exhibit (4A)(ii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 7, 2000, File No. 1-3196); Securities Resolution No. 1 effective as of April 12, 1995 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed April 21, 1995, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 7 3/
 3/8% Debentures Due April 1, 2005); Securities Resolution No. 2 effective as of October 16, 1996 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed October 18, 1996, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6 7/ 7/8% Debentures Due October 15, 2006); Securities Resolution No. 3 effective as of December 10, 1996 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed December 12, 1996, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6 5/ 5/8% Debentures Due December 1, 2008); Securities Resolution No. 4 effective as of December 9, 1997 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed December 12, 1997, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6.80% Debentures Due December 15, 2027); Securities Resolution No. 5 effective as of October 20, 1998 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed October 22, 1998, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6% Debentures Due October 15, 2010); Securities Resolution No. 6 effective as of September 21, 1999 (Exhibit 4A(iv), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 7, 2000, File No. 1-3196, and relating to the 7 1/ 1/4% Notes Due October 1, 2004); Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).
   X    
4.84.7  Form of Senior Indenture, dated June 1, 2000, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(iii), Form S-3 Registration Statement filed December 21, 1999, File No. 333-93187); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 22, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Second and Third Supplemental Indentures, dated July 1, 2000 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed July 11, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 8, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed September 11, 2000, File No. 1-8489);X

153


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated October 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed October 12, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Form of Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2001 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed January 24, 2001, File No. 1-8489); Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 1, 2001 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed May 25, 2001, File No. 1-8489); Form of Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed March 18, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Form ofX

154


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 25, 2002, File No. 1- 8489); Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 11, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 16, 2002 (Exhibit 4.1, Form 8-K filed September 17, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed August 20, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Fifteenth and Sixteenth Supplemental Indentures, dated December 1, 2002 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed December 13, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Seventeenth and Eighteenth Supplemental Indentures, dated February 1, 2003 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed February 11, 2003, File No. 1-8489; Forms of Twentieth and Twenty-First Supplemental Indentures, dated March 1, 2003 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed March 4, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Form of Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated July 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed July 22, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Form of Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed December 10, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Twenty-Fifth and Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indentures, dated January 1, 2004 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 14, 2004, File No. 1-8489); Form of Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2004 (Exhibit 4.2, Form S-4 Registration Statement filed November 10, 2004, File No. 333-120339); Forms of Twenty-Eighth and Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indentures, dated June 1, 2005 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed June 17, 2005, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated July 1, 2005 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed July 12, 2005, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2005 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 26, 2005, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Thirty-Second and Thirty-Third Supplemental Indentures, dated November 1, 2006 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed November 13, 2006, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated November 1, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 29, 2007, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Thirty-Fifth, Thirty-Sixth and Thirty-Seventh Supplemental Indentures, dated June 1, 2008 (Exhibits 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4, Form 8-K filed June 16, 2008, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-Eighth Supplemental and Amending Indenture, dated November 1, 2008 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 26, 2008, File No. 1-8489); Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture Amending the Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2008 and effective as of December 16, 2008 (Exhibit 4.1, Form 8-K filed December 5, 2008, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2009 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed August 12, 2009, File No. 1-8489); Fortieth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2010 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed September 2, 2010, File No. 1-8489); Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2011(Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed March 7, 2011, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2011 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K, filed March 7, 2011, File No. 1-8489);Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2011 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2011, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2011 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed August 15, 2011, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed September 13, 2012, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K, filed September 13, 2012, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.5, Form 8-K, filed September 13, 2012, File No. 1-8489).    
4.94.8  Indenture, dated April 1, 2001, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to Bank One Trust Company, National Association) (Exhibit 4.1, Form S-3 Registration Statement filed December 22, 2000, File No. 333-52602); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 2001 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed April 12, 2001, File No. 1-3196); Forms of Second and Third Supplemental Indentures, dated October 25, 2001 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed October 23, 2001, File No. 1-3196); Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed May 22, 2002, File No. 1-3196); Form of Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 25, 2003, File No. 1-3196); Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated November 1, 2004 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 16, 2004, File No. 1-3196); Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.6, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.10Form of Indenture for Junior Subordinated Debentures, dated October 1, 2001, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to Bank One Trust Company, National Association) (Exhibit 4.2, Form S-3 Registration Statement filed December 22, 2000, File No. 333-52602); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 23, 2001 (Exhibit 4.7, Form 8-K filed October 16, 2001, File No. 1-3196); Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.8, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).X

154


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
4.114.9  Junior Subordinated Indenture II, dated June 1, 2006, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006, File No. 1-8489); First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2006 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006, File No. 1-8489); Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2006 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed November 1, 2006, File No. 1-8489); Form of Third Supplemental and Amending Indenture, dated June 1, 2009 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.124.10  Replacement Capital Covenant entered into by Dominion Resources, Inc. dated June 23, 2006 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006, File No. 1-8489), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Replacement Capital Covenant dated September 26, 2011 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed October 28, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    

4.13155


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
4.11  Replacement Capital Covenant entered into by Dominion Resources, Inc. dated September 29, 2006 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed November 1, 2006, File No. 1-8489), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Replacement Capital Covenant dated September 26, 2011 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed October 28, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.144.12  Replacement Capital Covenant entered into by Dominion Resources, Inc. dated June 17, 2009 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.1  DRIDRS Services Agreement, dated January 28, 2000, by and1, 2003, between Dominion Resources, Inc., and Dominion Resources Services, Inc. and Consolidated Natural Gas Service Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10(vii),10.1, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 19992011 filed March 7, 2000,February 28, 2012, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.2  DRS Services Agreement, dated as of January 2012, between Dominion Resources Services, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company dated January 1, 2000 (Exhibit 10.19,10.2, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 19992011 filed March 7, 2000,February 28, 2012, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).  X   X  
10.3  Agreement between PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Virginia Electric and Power Company (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 26, 2005, File No. 1-2255 and File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.610.4  $3.0 billion Three-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated September 24, 2010 among Dominion Resources, Inc., Virginia Electric and Power Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Capital, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, and other lenders named therein. (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed September 28, 2010, File No. 1-8489)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255), as amended October 1, 2011 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.710.5  $500 million Three-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated September 24, 2010 among Dominion Resources, Inc., Virginia Electric and Power Company, Keybank National Association, as Administrative Agent, Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Syndication Agents, and other lenders named therein. (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed September 28, 2010, File No. 1-8489)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255), as amended October 1, 2011 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.810.6  Form of Settlement Agreement in the form of a proposed Consent Decree among the United States of America, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State of New York, the State of New Jersey, the State of Connecticut, the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of West Virginia and Virginia Electric and Power Company (Exhibit 10, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed May 9, 2003, File No. 1-8489)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.10*10.7*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective December 17, 2004 (Exhibit 10.5, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.11*10.8*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan, effective April 22, 1997, as amended and restated effective July 20, 2001 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 filed August 3, 2001, File No. 1-8489), as amended June 20, 2007 (Exhibit 10.9, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.5, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.12*10.9*  Form of Employment Continuity Agreement for certain officers of Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company, amended and restated July 15, 2003 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 11, 2003, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 2255)1-2255), as amended March 31, 2006 (Form 8-K filed April 4, 2006, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.13*10.10*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, as amended and restated effective December 17, 2004 (Exhibit 10.6, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  

155


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.14*10.11*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective December 17, 2004 (Exhibit 10.7, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.15*10.12*  Dominion Resources, Inc. New Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.8, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489), amended January 19, 2006 (Exhibit 10.17, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed March 2, 2006, File No. 1-8489), as amended December 1, 2006 and further amended January 1, 2007 (Exhibit 10.17, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed February 28, 2007, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  

10.16*156


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.13*  Dominion Resources, Inc. New Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, effective January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.9, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489), as amended January 1, 2007 (Exhibit 10.18, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed February 28, 2007, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.4, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-2255), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.17, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 26, 2009, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.20, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 26, 2009, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.17*10.14*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Stock Accumulation Plan for Outside Directors, amended as of February 27, 2004 (Exhibit 10.15, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 1, 2004, File No. 1-8489) as amended effective December 31, 2004 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.18*10.15*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Directors Stock Compensation Plan, as amended February 27, 2004 (Exhibit 10.16, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 1, 2004, File No. 1-8489) as amended effective December 31, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.19*10.16*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Cash Compensation Plan, as amended and in effect September 20, 2002 (Exhibit 10.4, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed November 8, 2002, File No. 1-8489) as amended effective December 31, 2004 (Exhibit 10.3, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.20*10.17*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2005, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10.21, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.21, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 26, 2009, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective December 17, 2009 (Exhibit 10.18, Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed February 26, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.21*10.18*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Leadership Stock Option Plan, effective July 1, 2000, as amended and restated effective July 20, 2001 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 filed August 3, 2001, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.22*10.19*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Executive Stock Purchase Tool Kit, effective September 1, 2001, amended and restated February 18, 2011 (filed herewith)(Exhibit 10.22, Form 10-K filed February 28, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.23*10.20*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Security Option Plan, effective January 1, 2003, amended December 31, 2004 and restated effective January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.13, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.24*10.21*  Letter agreement between Dominion Resources, Inc. and Thomas F. Farrell II, dated February 27, 2003 (Exhibit 10.24, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 filed March 20, 2003, File No. 1-8489), as amended December 16, 2005 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 16, 2005, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.25*10.22*  Employment agreement dated February 13, 2007 between Dominion Resources Services, Inc. and Mark F. McGettrick (Exhibit 10.34, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed February 28, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    

156


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.26*10.23*  Supplemental retirement agreement dated October 22, 2003 between Dominion Resources, Inc. and Paul D. Koonce (Exhibit 10.18, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 1, 2004, File No. 1-2255).   X    
10.27*10.24*  Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated December 12, 2000, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and David A. Christian (Exhibit 10.25, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 filed March 11, 2002, File No. 1-2255).   X    
10.28*Letter Agreement between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and George A. Davidson, Jr. dated December 22, 1998, related letter dated January 8, 1999 and Amendment to Letter Agreement dated February 26, 2008 (Exhibit 10.37, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-8489).X
10.29*Form of Restricted Stock Grant under 2006 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 31, 2006 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 4, 2006, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.30*10.25*  Form of Restricted Stock Grant under 2007 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 30, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 5, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.31*Form of Performance Grant under 2007 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 30, 2007 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed April 5, 2007, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.32*10.26*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2008 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 27, 2008 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 2, 2008, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.33*2008 Performance Grant Plan under 2008 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 27, 2008 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed April 2, 2008, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.34*10.27*  Form of Advancement of Expenses for certain directors and officers of Dominion Resources, Inc., approved by the Dominion Resources, Inc. Board of Directors on October 24, 2008 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  

10.35*157


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.28*  2009 Performance Grant Plan under 2009 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 26, 2009 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 29, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.36*10.29*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2009 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 26, 2009 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 29, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.37*10.30*  Dominion Resources, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, originally effective May 1, 2005, as amended and restated effective May 5, 2009December 20, 2011 (Exhibit 10,10.32, Form 8-K10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 filed May 11, 2009,February 28, 2012, File No. 1-8489), as amended December 17, 2010 (filed herewith)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.38*10.31*  2010 Performance Grant Plan under 2010 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 21, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 22, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.39*10.32*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2010 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 21, 2010 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 22, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.40*10.33*  Supplemental Retirement Agreement with Mark F. McGettrick effective May 19, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.41*10.34*  2011 Performance Grant Plan under 2011 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 20, 2011 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 21, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.42*10.35*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2011 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 20, 2011 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 21, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.43*10.36*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Mark F. McGettrick, Paul D. Koonce and David A. Christian under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan approved December 17, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 21, 2012, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.37*2012 Performance Grant Plan under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Program approved January 19, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 20, 2012, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.38*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2012 Long-term incentive Program approved January 19, 2012 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 20, 2012, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.39*

2013 Performance Grant Plan under 2013 Long-term Incentive Program approved January 24, 2013 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 25, 2013, File No. 1-8489).

XX
10.40*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2013 Long-term Incentive Program approved January 24, 2013 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 25, 2013, File No. 1-8489).

XX
10.41*  Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Thomas F. Farrell II, dated December 17, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 17, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.44*10.42*  Base salaries for named executive officers of Dominion Resources, Inc. (filed herewith).   X    

157


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.45*10.43*  Non-employee directors’ annual compensation for Dominion Resources, Inc. (filed herewith).X
10.46*Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Gary L. Sypolt approved September 24, 2010 (filed herewith).   X    
12.a  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for Dominion Resources, Inc. (filed herewith).   X    
12.b  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed herewith).     X  
12.c  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and dividends for Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed herewith).     X  
21  Subsidiaries of Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed herewith).   X     X  
23  Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (filed herewith).   X     X  
31.a  Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Dominion Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).   X    
31.b  Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Dominion Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).   X    
31.c  Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).     X  
31.d  Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).     X  
32.a  Certification to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Dominion Resources, Inc. as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).   X    

158


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
32.b  Certification to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).     X  
99.1Dominion Resources, Inc. Earnings Release Kit (furnished herewith).X
99.2Supplemental Summary of 2012 Operating Earnings (furnished herewith).X
99.3Towers Watson Energy Services Survey participants (filed herewith).X
101^  The following financial statements from Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010,2012, filed on February 28, 2011,2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders’ Equity (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.   X    X

 

*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
^This exhibit will not be deemed “filed” by Virginia Electric and Power Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that one of the CompaniesVirginia Electric and Power Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

158   159

 


Signatures

 

 

 

DOMINION

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

DOMINION RESOURCES, INC.INC.
By: /S/    THOMAS F. FARRELL II        
 (Thomas F. Farrell II, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer)

Date: February 28, 20112013

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 28th day of February, 2011.2013.

 

Signature  Title

/S/    THOMAS F. FARRELL II        

Thomas F. Farrell II

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief

Executive Officer

/S/    WILLIAM P. BARR        

William P. Barr

  Director

/S/    PETER W. BROWN        

Peter W. Brown

Director

/S/    GEORGE A. DAVIDSON, JR.        

George A. Davidson, Jr.

  Director

/S/    HELEN E. DRAGAS        

Helen E. Dragas

  Director

/S/    JOHN W. HARRIS        

John W. Harris

  Director

/S/    ROBERT S. JEPSON, JR.        

Robert S. Jepson, Jr.

  Director

/S/    MARK J. KINGTON        

Mark J. Kington

  Director

/S/    MARGARET A. MCKENNA        

Margaret A. McKenna

Director

/S/    FRANK S. ROYAL        

Frank S. Royal

Director

/S/    ROBERT H. SPILMAN, JR.        

Robert H. Spilman, Jr.

  Director

/S/    MICHAEL E. SZYMANCZYK        

Michael E. Szymanczyk

Director

/S/    DAVID A. WOLLARD

David A. Wollard

  Director

/S/    MARK F. MCGETTRICK        

Mark F. McGettrick

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

/S/    ASHWINI SAWHNEY        

Ashwini Sawhney

  Vice President—Accounting and Controller (Chief Accounting Officer)

 

160   159

 


 

 

VIRGINIA POWER

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
By: /S/    THOMAS F. FARRELL II        
 

(Thomas F. Farrell II, Chairman of the Board

of Directors and Chief Executive Officer)

Date: February 28, 20112013

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 28th day of February, 2011.2013.

 

Signature  Title

/S/    THOMAS F. FARRELL II        

Thomas F. Farrell II

  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

/S/    MARK F. MCGETTRICK        

Mark F. McGettrick

  Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

/S/    ASHWINI SAWHNEY        

Ashwini Sawhney

  Vice President—AccountingPresident-Accounting (Chief Accounting Officer)

/S/    STEVEN A. ROGERS        

Steven A. Rogers

  Director

 

160   161

 


Exhibit Index

 

 

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

  Dominion   Virginia
Power
 
2  Purchase and Sale Agreement between Dominion Resources, Inc., Dominion Energy, Inc., Dominion Transmission, Inc. and CONSOL Energy Holdings LLC VI (Exhibit 99.1, Form 8-K filed March 15, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X    
3.1.a  Dominion Resources, Inc. Articles of Incorporation as amended and restated, effective May 20, 2010 (Exhibit 3.1, Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X    
3.1.b  Virginia Electric and Power Company Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as in effect on October 28, 2003March 3, 2011 (Exhibit 3.1,3.1b, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed November 7, 2003,April 29, 2011, File No. 1-2255).     X  
3.2.a  Dominion Resources, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective May 18, 2010December 13, 2011 (Exhibit 3.2,3.1, Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010,December 14, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    
3.2.b  Virginia Electric and Power Company Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective June 1, 2009 (Exhibit 3.1, Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009, File No. 1-2255).     X  
4  Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company agree to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request any other instrument with respect to long-term debt as to which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of either of their total consolidated assets.   X     X  
4.1.a  See Exhibit 3.1.a above.   X    
4.1.b  See Exhibit 3.1.b above.     X  
4.2  Indenture of Mortgage of Virginia Electric and Power Company, dated November 1, 1935, as supplemented and modified by Fifty-Eighth Supplemental Indentures (Exhibit 4(ii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1985, File No. 1-2255); Eighty-First Supplemental Indenture, (Exhibit 4(iii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eighty-FifthNinety-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated Februaryas of July 1, 19972012 (Exhibit 4(i),4.1, Form 8-K10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed February 20, 1997,August 1, 2012, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
4.3Subordinated Note Indenture, dated August 1, 1995 between Virginia Electric and Power Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Bank)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(a), Form S-3 Registration Statement filed January 28, 1997, File No. 333-20561), Form of Second Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.6, Form 8-K filed August 20, 2002, File No. 1-2255).XX
4.4  Form of Senior Indenture, dated June 1, 1998, between Virginia Electric and Power Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(iii), Form S-3 Registration Statement filed February 27, 1998, File No. 333-47119); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 1998 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 12, 1998, File No. 1-2255); Form of Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 1999 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 4, 1999, File No. 1-2255); Form of Third Supplemental Indenture, dated November 1, 1999 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed October 27, 1999, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Fourth and Fifth Supplemental Indentures, dated March 1, 2001 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed March 26, 2001, File No. 1-2255); Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed January 29, 2002, File No. 1-2255); Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed September 11, 2002, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated February 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed February 27, 2003, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Ninth and Tenth Supplemental Indentures, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed December 4, 2003, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed December 11, 2003, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Twelfth and Thirteenth Supplemental Indentures, dated January 1, 2006 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 12, 2006, File No. 1-2255); Form of Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 1, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed May 16, 2007, File No. 1-2255); Form of Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 10, 2007, File No. 1-2255); Forms of Sixteenth and Seventeenth Supplemental Indentures, dated November 1, 2007 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed November 30, 2007, File No. 1-2255); Form of Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 2008 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed April 15, 2008, File No. 1-2255); Form of Nineteenth Supplemental and Amending Indenture, dated November 1, 2008 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 5, 2008, File No. 1-2255); Form of Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2009 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed June 24, 2009, File No. 1-2255); Form of Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2010 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed September 1, 2010, File No. 1-2255); Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 12, 2012, File No. 1-2255); Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2013 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 8, 2013, File No. 1-2255); Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2013 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed January 8, 2013, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  

161


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
4.54.4  Indenture, Junior Subordinated Debentures, dated December 1, 1997, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)) as supplemented by a First Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 1997 (ExhibitX

162


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
(Exhibit 4.1 and Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-4 Registration Statement filed April 22, 1998, File No. 333-50653); Forms of Second and Third Supplemental Indentures, dated January 1, 2001 (Exhibits 4.6 and 4.13, Form 8-K filed January 12, 2001, File No. 1-8489).  X
4.64.5  Indenture, dated May 1, 1971, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company)) (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-5012); Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 1, 1989 (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-7651); Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 1993 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-8167); Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 1993 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File No. 70-8167); Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 28, 2000 (Exhibit (4A)(iii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 7, 2000, File No. 1-3196); Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 19, 2001 (Exhibit 4.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed November 7, 2003, File No. 1-3196); Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.74.6  Indenture, dated April 1, 1995, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to United States Trust Company of New York) (Exhibit (4), Certificate of Notification No. 1 filed April 19, 1995, File No. 70-8107); First Supplemental Indenture dated January 28, 2000 (Exhibit (4A)(ii), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 7, 2000, File No. 1-3196); Securities Resolution No. 1 effective as of April 12, 1995 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed April 21, 1995, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 7 3/ 3/8% Debentures Due April 1, 2005); Securities Resolution No. 2 effective as of October 16, 1996 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed October 18, 1996, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6 7/ 7/8% Debentures Due October 15, 2006); Securities Resolution No. 3 effective as of December 10, 1996 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed December 12, 1996, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6 5/ 5/8% Debentures Due December 1, 2008); Securities Resolution No. 4 effective as of December 9, 1997 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed December 12, 1997, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6.80% Debentures Due December 15, 2027); Securities Resolution No. 5 effective as of October 20, 1998 (Exhibit 2, Form 8-A filed October 22, 1998, File No. 1-3196 and relating to the 6% Debentures Due October 15, 2010); Securities Resolution No. 6 effective as of September 21, 1999 (Exhibit 4A(iv), Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 7, 2000, File No. 1-3196, and relating to the 7 1/ 1/4% Notes Due October 1, 2004); Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.84.7  Form of Senior Indenture, dated June 1, 2000, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank)), as Trustee (Exhibit 4(iii), Form S-3 Registration Statement filed December 21, 1999, File No. 333-93187); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 22, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Second and Third Supplemental Indentures, dated July 1, 2000 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed July 11, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 8, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed September 11, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated October 1, 2000 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed October 12, 2000, File No. 1-8489); Form of Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2001 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed January 24, 2001, File No. 1-8489); Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 1, 2001 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed May 25, 2001, File No. 1-8489); Form of Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed March 18, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 25, 2002, File No. 1- 8489); Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 11, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 16, 2002 (Exhibit 4.1, Form 8-K filed September 17, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed August 20, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Fifteenth and Sixteenth Supplemental Indentures, dated December 1, 2002 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed December 13, 2002, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Seventeenth and EighteenthX

162


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
Supplemental Indentures, dated February 1, 2003 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed February 11, 2003, File No. 1-8489; Forms of Twentieth and Twenty-First Supplemental Indentures, dated March 1, 2003 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed March 4, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Form of Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated July 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed July 22, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Form of Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2,X

163


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
Form 8-K filed December 10, 2003, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Twenty-Fifth and Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indentures, dated January 1, 2004 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed January 14, 2004, File No. 1-8489); Form of Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2004 (Exhibit 4.2, Form S-4 Registration Statement filed November 10, 2004, File No. 333-120339); Forms of Twenty-Eighth and Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indentures, dated June 1, 2005 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed June 17, 2005, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated July 1, 2005 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed July 12, 2005, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2005 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed September 26, 2005, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Thirty-Second and Thirty-Third Supplemental Indentures, dated November 1, 2006 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed November 13, 2006, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated November 1, 2007 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 29, 2007, File No. 1-8489); Forms of Thirty-Fifth, Thirty-Sixth and Thirty-Seventh Supplemental Indentures, dated June 1, 2008 (Exhibits 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4, Form 8-K filed June 16, 2008, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-Eighth Supplemental and Amending Indenture, dated November 1, 2008 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 26, 2008, File No. 1-8489); Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture Amending the Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2008 and effective as of December 16, 2008 (Exhibit 4.1, Form 8-K filed December 5, 2008, File No. 1-8489); Form of Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2009 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed August 12, 2009, File No. 1-8489); Fortieth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2010 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed September 2, 2010, File No. 1-8489); Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2011(Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed March 7, 2011, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2011 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K, filed March 7, 2011, File No. 1-8489);Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2011 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2011, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 1, 2011 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed August 15, 2011, File
No. 1-8489); Forty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K, filed September 13, 2012, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K, filed September 13, 2012, File No. 1-8489); Forty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated September 1, 2012 (Exhibit 4.5, Form 8-K, filed September 13, 2012, File No. 1-8489).
    
4.94.8  Indenture, dated April 1, 2001, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to Bank One Trust Company, National Association) (Exhibit 4.1, Form S-3 Registration Statement filed December 22, 2000, File No. 333-52602); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 2001 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed April 12, 2001, File No. 1-3196); Forms of Second and Third Supplemental Indentures, dated October 25, 2001 (Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, Form 8-K filed October 23, 2001, File No. 1-3196); Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 1, 2002 (Exhibit 4.4, Form 8-K filed May 22, 2002, File No. 1-3196); Form of Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 25, 2003, File No. 1-3196); Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated November 1, 2004 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed November 16, 2004, File No. 1-3196); Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.6, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.10Form of Indenture for Junior Subordinated Debentures, dated October 1, 2001, between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor trustee to Bank One Trust Company, National Association) (Exhibit 4.2, Form S-3 Registration Statement filed December 22, 2000, File No. 333-52602); Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 23, 2001 (Exhibit 4.7, Form 8-K filed October 16, 2001, File No. 1-3196); Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 27, 2007 (Exhibit 4.8, Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007, File No. 1-8489).X
4.114.9  Junior Subordinated Indenture II, dated June 1, 2006, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006, File No. 1-8489); First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2006 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006, File No. 1-8489); Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2006 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed November 1, 2006, File No. 1-8489); Form of Third Supplemental and Amending Indenture, dated June 1, 2009 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.124.10  Replacement Capital Covenant entered into by Dominion Resources, Inc. dated June 23, 2006 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006, File No. 1-8489), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Replacement Capital Covenant dated September 26, 2011 (Exhibit 4.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed October 28, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    
4.134.11  Replacement Capital Covenant entered into by Dominion Resources, Inc. dated September 29, 2006 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed November 1, 2006, File No. 1-8489), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Replacement Capital Covenant dated September 26, 2011 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed October 28, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    

 

164   163

 


 

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

  Dominion   Virginia
Power
 
4.144.12  Replacement Capital Covenant entered into by Dominion Resources, Inc. dated June 17, 2009 (Exhibit 4.3, Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.1  DRIDRS Services Agreement, dated January 28, 2000, by and1, 2003, between Dominion Resources, Inc., and Dominion Resources Services, Inc. and Consolidated Natural Gas Service Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10(vii),10.1, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 19992011 filed March 7, 2000,February 28, 2012, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.2  DRS Services Agreement, dated as of January 2012, between Dominion Resources Services, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company dated January 1, 2000 (Exhibit 10.19,10.2, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 19992011 filed March 7, 2000,February 28, 2012, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).  X   X  
10.3  Agreement between PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Virginia Electric and Power Company (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 26, 2005, File No. 1-2255 and File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.610.4  $3.0 billion Three-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated September 24, 2010 among Dominion Resources, Inc., Virginia Electric and Power Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Capital, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, and other lenders named therein. (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed September 28, 2010, File No. 1-8489)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255), as amended October 1, 2011 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.710.5  $500 million Three-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated September 24, 2010 among Dominion Resources, Inc., Virginia Electric and Power Company, Keybank National Association, as Administrative Agent, Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Syndication Agents, and other lenders named therein. (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed September 28, 2010, File No. 1-8489)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255), as amended October 1, 2011 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.810.6  Form of Settlement Agreement in the form of a proposed Consent Decree among the United States of America, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State of New York, the State of New Jersey, the State of Connecticut, the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of West Virginia and Virginia Electric and Power Company (Exhibit 10, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed May 9, 2003, File No. 1-8489)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.10*10.7*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective December 17, 2004 (Exhibit 10.5, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.11*10.8*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan, effective April 22, 1997, as amended and restated effective July 20, 2001 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 filed August 3, 2001, File No. 1-8489), as amended June 20, 2007 (Exhibit 10.9, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.5, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.12*10.9*  Form of Employment Continuity Agreement for certain officers of Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company, amended and restated July 15, 2003 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 11, 2003, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 2255)1-2255), as amended March 31, 2006 (Form 8-K filed April 4, 2006, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.13*10.10*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, as amended and restated effective December 17, 2004 (Exhibit 10.6, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.14*10.11*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective December 17, 2004 (Exhibit 10.7, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.15*10.12*  Dominion Resources, Inc. New Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.8, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489), amended January 19, 2006 (Exhibit 10.17, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed March 2, 2006, File No. 1-8489), as amended December 1, 2006 and further amended January 1, 2007 (Exhibit 10.17, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed February 28, 2007, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.16*10.13*  Dominion Resources, Inc. New Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, effective January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.9, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489), as amended January 1, 2007 (Exhibit 10.18, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed February 28, 2007, File   X     X  

 

164   165

 


 

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

  Dominion   Virginia
Power
 
  No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.4, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-2255), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.17, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 26, 2009, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.20, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 26, 2009, File No. 1-2255).    
10.17*10.14*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Stock Accumulation Plan for Outside Directors, amended as of February 27, 2004 (Exhibit 10.15, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 1, 2004, File No. 1-8489) as amended effective December 31, 2004 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.18*10.15*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Directors Stock Compensation Plan, as amended February 27, 2004 (Exhibit 10.16, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 1, 2004, File No. 1-8489) as amended effective December 31, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.19*10.16*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Cash Compensation Plan, as amended and in effect September 20, 2002 (Exhibit 10.4, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed November 8, 2002, File No. 1-8489) as amended effective December 31, 2004 (Exhibit 10.3, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.20*10.17*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2005, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008 (Exhibit 10.21, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.21, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed February 26, 2009, File No. 1-8489), as amended and restated effective December 17, 2009 (Exhibit 10.18, Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed February 26, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.21*10.18*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Leadership Stock Option Plan, effective July 1, 2000, as amended and restated effective July 20, 2001 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 filed August 3, 2001, File No. 1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.22*10.19*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Executive Stock Purchase Tool Kit, effective September 1, 2001, amended and restated February 18, 2011 (filed herewith)(Exhibit 10.22, Form 10-K filed February 28, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.23*10.20*  Dominion Resources, Inc. Security Option Plan, effective January 1, 2003, amended December 31, 2004 and restated effective January 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.13, Form 8-K filed December 23, 2004, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.24*10.21*  Letter agreement between Dominion Resources, Inc. and Thomas F. Farrell II, dated February 27, 2003 (Exhibit 10.24, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 filed March 20, 2003, File No. 1-8489), as amended December 16, 2005 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 16, 2005, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.25*10.22*  Employment agreement dated February 13, 2007 between Dominion Resources Services, Inc. and Mark F. McGettrick (Exhibit 10.34, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed February 28, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X    
10.26*10.23*  Supplemental retirement agreement dated October 22, 2003 between Dominion Resources, Inc. and Paul D. Koonce (Exhibit 10.18, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 1, 2004, File No. 1-2255).   X    
10.27*10.24*  Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated December 12, 2000, between Dominion Resources, Inc. and David A. Christian (Exhibit 10.25, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 filed March 11, 2002, File No. 1-2255).   X    
10.28*Letter Agreement between Consolidated Natural Gas Company and George A. Davidson, Jr. dated December 22, 1998, related letter dated January 8, 1999 and Amendment to Letter Agreement dated February 26, 2008 (Exhibit 10.37, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed February 28, 2008, File No. 1-8489).X

165


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.29*Form of Restricted Stock Grant under 2006 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 31, 2006 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 4, 2006, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.30*10.25*  Form of Restricted Stock Grant under 2007 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 30, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 5, 2007, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.31*Form of Performance Grant under 2007 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 30, 2007 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed April 5, 2007, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.32*10.26*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2008 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 27, 2008 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed April 2, 2008, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  

10.33*2008 Performance Grant Plan under 2008 Long-Term Compensation Program approved March 27, 2008 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed April 2, 2008, File No. 1-8489).X166   X


10.34*

Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
10.27*  Form of Advancement of Expenses for certain directors and officers of Dominion Resources, Inc., approved by the Dominion Resources, Inc. Board of Directors on October 24, 2008 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-8489 and Exhibit 10.3, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed October 30, 2008, File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.35*10.28*  2009 Performance Grant Plan under 2009 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 26, 2009 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 29, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.36*10.29*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2009 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 26, 2009 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 29, 2009, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.37*10.30*  Dominion Resources, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, originally effective May 1, 2005, as amended and restated effective May 5, 2009December 20, 2011 (Exhibit 10,10.32, Form 8-K10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 filed May 11, 2009,February 28, 2012, File No. 1-8489), as amended December 17, 2010 (filed herewith)1-8489 and File No. 1-2255).   X     X  
10.38*10.31*  2010 Performance Grant Plan under 2010 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 21, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 22, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.39*10.32*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2010 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 21, 2010 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 22, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.40*10.33*  Supplemental Retirement Agreement with Mark F. McGettrick effective May 19, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.41*
10.34*  2011 Performance Grant Plan under 2011 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 20, 2011 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 21, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.42*10.35*  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2011 Long-Term Compensation Program approved January 20, 2011 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 21, 2011, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.43*10.36*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Mark F. McGettrick, Paul D. Koonce and David A. Christian under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan approved December 17, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 21, 2012, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.37*2012 Performance Grant Plan under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Program approved January 19, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 20, 2012, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.38*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2012 Long-term incentive Program approved January 19, 2012 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 20, 2012, File No. 1-8489).XX
10.39*

2013 Performance Grant Plan under 2013 Long-term Incentive Program approved January 24, 2013 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed January 25, 2013, File No. 1-8489).

XX
10.40*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2013 Long-term Incentive Program approved January 24, 2013 (Exhibit 10.2, Form 8-K filed January 25, 2013, File No. 1-8489).

XX
10.41*  Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Thomas F. Farrell II, dated December 17, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1, Form 8-K filed December 17, 2010, File No. 1-8489).   X     X  
10.44*10.42*  Base salaries for named executive officers of Dominion Resources, Inc. (filed herewith).   X    
10.45*10.43*  Non-employee directors’ annual compensation for Dominion Resources, Inc. (filed herewith).X
10.46*Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Gary L. Sypolt approved September 24, 2010 (filed herewith).   X    
12.a  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for Dominion Resources, Inc. (filed herewith).   X    
12.b  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed herewith).     X  
12.c  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and dividends for Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed herewith).     X  
21  Subsidiaries of Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed herewith).   X     X  
23  Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (filed herewith).   X     X  
31.a  Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Dominion Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).   X    
31.b  Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Dominion Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).   X    

166


Exhibit
Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
31.c  Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).     X  

167


Exhibit

Number

Description

DominionVirginia
Power
31.d  Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).     X  
32.a  Certification to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Dominion Resources, Inc. as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).   X    
32.b  Certification to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).     X  
99.1Dominion Resources, Inc. Earnings Release Kit (furnished herewith).X
99.2Supplemental Summary of 2012 Operating Earnings (furnished herewith).X
99.3Towers Watson Energy Services Survey participants (filed herewith).X
101^  The following financial statements from Dominion Resources, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010,2012, filed on February 28, 2011,2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders’ Equity (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.   X    X

 

*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
^This exhibit will not be deemed “filed” by Virginia Electric and Power Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that one of the CompaniesVirginia Electric and Power Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

168   167