UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20122013

or

or¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number 0-8408

 

WOODWARD, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware36-1984010

Commission file number 0-8408

WOODWARD, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

36-1984010

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado

80525

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(970) 482-5811

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(970) 482-5811

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Common stock, par value $.001455 per share

NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes x   No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer   x   Accelerated filer   ¨    Non-accelerated filer ¨Smaller reporting company ¨

Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨  Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes ¨   No x

Aggregate market value of registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of a share of the registrant’s common stock on March 30, 201228, 2013 as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date:  $2,213,944,471.$1,970,701,485.  For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by (i) persons holding more than 5% of the outstanding shares of stock, (ii) officers and directors of the registrant, and (iii) the Woodward Governor Company Profit Sharing Trust, Woodward Governor Company Deferred Shares Trust, or the Woodward Charitable Trust, as of March 31, 2012,2013, are excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.  This determination is not necessarily conclusive of affiliate status.

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of November 12, 2012: 68,424,649.2013: 68,090,550.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held January 23, 2013,22, 2014, are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III of this Form 10-K, to the extent indicated.

 

 


 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

1


PART I

Forward Looking Statements

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that are deemed forward-looking statements.  These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of management.  Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “seek,” “goal,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “continue,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “strive,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characteristics of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, among others, statements relating to:

·

future sales, earnings, cash flow, uses of cash, and other measures of financial performance;

·

description

descriptions of our plans and expectations for future operations;

·

the effect of economic downturns or growth in particular regions;

·

the effect of changes in the level of activity in particular industries or markets;

·

the availability and cost of materials, components, services, and supplies;

·

the scope, nature, or impact of acquisition activity and integration of such acquisitions into our businesses;

·

the development, production, and support of advanced technologies and new products and services;

·

new business opportunities;

·

restructuring and alignment costs and savings;

·

our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions with respect to recent acquisitions and expected business opportunities that may be available to us;

·

the outcome of contingencies;

·

future repurchases of common stock;

·

future levels of indebtedness and capital spending; and

·

pension plan assumptions and future contributions.

Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including:

·

a decline in business with, or financial distress of, our significant customers;

·

the continued global economic uncertainty and instability in the financial markets, sovereign credit rating downgrades and uncertainty surrounding European sovereign and other debt defaults, and prolonged unfavorable economic and other industry conditions;markets;

·

our ability to obtain financing, on acceptable terms or at all, to implement our business plans, complete acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to business pressures;

·

the long sales cycle, customer evaluation process, and implementation period of some of our products and services;

·

our ability to implement and realize the intended effects of ourany restructuring and alignment efforts;

·

our ability to successfully manage competitive factors, including prices, promotional incentives, industry consolidation, and commodity and other input cost increases;

·

our ability to manage our expenses and product mix while responding to sales increases or decreases;

·

the ability of our subcontractors to perform contractual obligations and our suppliers to provide us with materials of sufficient quality or quantity required to meet our production needs at favorable prices or at all;

2

 


·

our ability to monitor our technological expertise and the success of, and/or expensescosts associated with, our product development activities;

·

our ability to integrate acquisitions and manage costs related thereto;

·

our debt obligations, our debt service requirements, and our ability to operate our business, pursue business strategies and incur additional debt in light of covenants contained in our outstanding debt agreements;

·

risks related to our U. S.U.S. Government contracting activities, including liabilities resulting from legal and regulatory proceedings, inquiries, or investigations related to such activities;

·

the potential of a significant reduction in defense sales due to decreases in the amount of U.S. Federal defense spending, including as a resultthe impacts of the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “Budget Act”), or other specific budget cuts impacting defense programs in which we participate;

·

changes in government spending patterns and/or priorities;

·

future impairment charges resulting from changes in the estimates of fair value of reporting units or of long-lived assets;

·

future results of our subsidiaries or changes in domestic or international tax statutes;subsidiaries;

·

environmental liabilities related to manufacturing activities;activities and/or real estate acquisitions;

·

our continued access to a stable workforce and favorable labor relations with our employees;

·

the geographical location of a significant portion of

physical and other risks related to our Aerospace business in California,operations and suppliers, including natural disasters, which historically has been susceptible to natural disasters;could disrupt production;

·

our ability to successfully manage regulatory, tax, and legal matters (including product liability, patent, and intellectual property matters);

·

liabilities resulting from legal and regulatory proceedings, inquiries, or investigations by private or U.S. Government persons or entities;

risks from operating internationally, including the impact on reported earnings from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, and compliance with and changes in the legal and regulatory environments of the United States and the countries in which we operate;

·

fair value of defined benefit plan assets and assumptions used in determining our retirement pension and other postretirement benefit obligations and related expenses including, among others, discount rates and investment return on pension assets; and

·

our operations may be adversely affected by information systems interruptions or intrusions; and

·

certain provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law that could discourage or prevent others from acquiring our company.

These factors are representative of the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in our forward-looking statements. Other factors are discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20122013 (this “Form 10-K”)10-K), as updated from time to time in our subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.  We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Unless we have indicated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-K  to “Woodward,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Woodward, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Except where we have otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, amounts presented in this Form 10-K are in thousands, except per share amounts.

 

Item 1.Business

GeneralItem 1. Business

General

Woodward enhances the global quality of life and sustainability by optimizing energy use through improved efficiency and lower emissions.  We are an independent designer, manufacturer, and service provider of energy control and optimization solutions.  We design, produce and service reliable, efficient, low-emission, and high-performance energy control products for diverse applications in challenging environments.  We have significant production and assembly facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia, and promote our products and services through our worldwide locations.

3


Our strategic focus is providing energy control and optimization solutions for the aerospace and energy markets.  The precise and efficient control of energy, including fluid and electrical energy, combustion, and motion, is a growing requirement in the markets we serve.  Our customers look to us to optimize the efficiency, emissions and operation of power equipment in both commercial and militarydefense operations.  Our core technologies leverage well across our markets and customer applications, enabling us to develop and integrate cost-effective and state-of-the-art fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation and electronic systems.  We focus primarily on serving original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and equipment packagers, partnering with them to bring superior component and system solutions to their demanding applications.  We also provide aftermarket repair, replacement and other service support for our installed products.

Our components and integrated systems optimize performance of commercial aircraft, militarydefense aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment, gas and steam turbines, wind turbines, including converters and power grid related equipment, industrial diesel, gas,  alternative and alternativedual fuel reciprocating engines, and electrical power systems.  Our innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help our customers offer more cost-effective, cleaner, and more reliable equipment. Our customers include leading OEMs and the end users of their products.

We were established in 1870, incorporated in 1902, and are headquartered in Fort Collins, Colorado.  The mailing address of our world headquarters is 1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525.  Our telephone number at that location is (970) 482-5811, and our website iswww.woodward.com. www.woodward.com.  None of the information contained on our website is incorporated into this document by reference.

Markets and Principal Lines of Business

We serve two primary markets – aerospace and energy.

Within the aerospace market, we provide systems, components and solutions for both commercial and militarydefense applications.  Our key focus areas within this market are:

·

Propulsion system control solutions for turbine powered aircraft; and

·

Propulsion system control solutions for turbine powered aircraft; and

Actuation systems and motion control solutions.

Within the energy market, our key focus areas are:

·

Control solutions for equipment that produce electricity using conventional or renewable energy sources;

·

Solutions for the control of power quality, distribution and storage on the electrical grid; and

·

Control solutions for equipment that produce electricity using conventional or renewable energy sources;

Solutions for the control of power quality, distribution and storage on the electrical grid; and

Control solutions for power equipment used in the extraction, distribution and conversion of renewable and fossil fuels in marine, mobile, and industrial equipment applications.

Our customers require technological solutions to meet their needs for performance, efficiency, and reliability, and to reduce their costs of operation.

Additional information about our operations in fiscal year 20122013 and outlook for the future, including certain segment information, is included in “Item 7–7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”  Additional information about our business segments and certain geographical information is included in Note 21,Segment informationand Note 22,Supplemental quarterly financial data (Unaudited), to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Products, Services and Applications

Aerospace

Our Aerospace segment designs, produces and services systems and products for the management of fuel, air, combustion and motion.  These products include main fuel pumps, metering units, actuators, air valves, specialty valves, fuel nozzles, metering units, cockpitand thrust reverser actuation systems for turbine engines and nacelles; as well as flight deck controls, actuators, servocontrols, motors and sensors.sensors for aircraft.  These products are used on commercial and militarydefense fixed-wing aircraft and rotorcraft, as well as in weapons and defense systems. 

We have significant content on a wide variety of commercial aircraft, rotorcraft and business jet platforms, including the Airbus A320, Boeing 787, Bell 429 and Gulfstream G650, and we have significant content on militarydefense applications, such as the Blackhawk helicopter, F-35 fighter jet, M1A1 Abrams Tank and guided tactical weapons, such as the Joint Direct Attack Munition (“JDAM”).

Revenues from the Aerospace segment are generated primarily by sales to OEMs, tier-one suppliers, and tier-one prime contractors, and through aftermarket sales of components, such as provisioning spares or replacements.  We also provide

4


aftermarket repair, overhaul and other services to commercial airlines, and other end users, turbine OEM repair facilities, military depots, and third party repair shops.

shops, and other end users. 

Energy

Our Energy segment designs, produces and services systems and products for the management of fuel, air, fluids, gases, electricity and motion.  These products include power converters, actuators, valves, pumps, injectors, solenoids, ignition systems, governors, electronics and devices that measure, communicate and protect low and medium voltage electrical distribution systems.  Our products are also used on industrial gas turbines, including heavy-frame and aeroderivative turbines, reciprocating engines, electrical grids, wind turbines and compressors.  The equipment on which our products are found is used to extract and distribute fossil and renewable fuels, to generate, distribute or store electricity, and to convert fuel to work in marine, mobile, and industrial equipment applications.

Revenues from the Energy segment are generated primarily by sales, which include aftermarket or replacement sales, to OEMs, tier-one suppliers, and tier-one prime contractors, and by providing other related services to our OEM customers and, in some cases, directly to end users or distributors.

Sales Order Backlog

Our backlog of unshipped sales orders as of October 31, 20122013 and 20112012 by segment was as follows:

 

      % Expected to be   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  October 31,   filled by
September
 October 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2012   30, 2013 2011 

October 31, 2013

 

% Expected to be filled by September 30, 2014

 

October 31, 2012

Aerospace

  $477,274     79 $492,263  

$

551,652 

 

77 

%

 

$

477,274 

Energy

   179,410     95    266,827  

 

227,115 

 

94 

 

 

 

179,410 
  

 

   

 

  

 

 

$

778,767 

 

82 

%

 

$

656,684 
  $656,684     83 $759,090  
  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Our current estimate of the sales order backlog is based on unshipped sales orders that are open in our order entry systems.  Unshipped orders are not necessarily an indicator of future sales levels because of variations in lead times and customer production schedules.

Seasonality

We do not believe that our sales, in total or in either business segment, are subject to significant seasonal variation.  However, our sales have generally been lower in the first quarter of our fiscal year as compared to the immediately preceding quarter due to fewer working days resulting from the observance of various holidays and scheduled plant shutdowns for annual maintenance.

Customers

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012,2013, approximately 36%39% of our consolidated net sales were made to our five largest customers.  Sales to our five largest customers represented approximately 34%36% and 39%34% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20112012 and September 30, 2010,2011, respectively.

Sales to our largest customer, General Electric, accounted for approximately 14%15%,  14%, and 15%14% of consolidated net sales in each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, respectively.  Our accounts receivable from General Electric represented approximately 10%11% of total accounts receivable as of September 30, 20122013 and 11%10% as of September 30, 2011.2012.  We believe General Electric and our other significant customers are creditworthy and will be able to satisfy their credit obligations to us.

The following customers who account for approximately 10% or more of sales to each of our reporting segments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 follow:2013.

 

Customer

Aerospace

United Technologies,

Boeing, General Electric, United Technologies

Energy

General Electric, Repower Systems AG, CaterpillarWeichai Westport

5


Government Contracts and Regulation

Portions of our business, particularly in our Aerospace segment, are heavily regulated.  We contract with numerous U.S. Government agencies and entities, including all of the branches of the U.S. military, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), and the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and Transportation.  We also contract with similar government authorities outside the United States with respect to our international efforts.States.

The U.S. Government, and other governments, may terminate any of our government contracts, (and, in general, subcontracts)or any government contracts under which we are a subcontractor, at their convenience, as well as for default based on specified performance measurements.  If any of our government contracts were to be terminated for convenience, we generally would be entitled to receive payment for work completed and allowable termination or cancellation costs.  If any of our government contracts were to be terminated for our default, the U.S. Government generally would pay only for the work accepted, and could require us to pay the difference between the original contract price and the cost to re-procure the contract items, net of the work accepted from the original contract.  The U.S. Government could also hold us liable for damages resulting from the default.

We must comply with, and are affected by, laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. Government contracts.  These laws and regulations, among other things:

·

require accurate, complete and current disclosure and certification of cost and pricing data in connection with certain contracts;

·

impose specific and unique cost accounting practices that may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), and therefore require reconciliation;

·

impose regulations that define allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. Government contracts;

·

impose manufacturing specifications and other quality standards that may be more restrictive than for non-government business activities; and

·

restrict the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and with respect to both the U.S. Government’s and the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes due to the regulations of the U.S. Government and foreign governments of foreign countries’ regulations pertaining to the export of certain products and technical data.

Sales made directly to U.S. Government agencies and entities, or indirectly through third party manufacturers utilizing Woodward parts and subassemblies, collectively representrepresented 21% of our sales for fiscal year 2013,  18% of our sales for fiscal year 2012, and 19% of our sales for fiscal year 2011, and 23% of our sales for fiscal year 2010.2011.  The level of U.S. spending for defense, alternative energy and other programs, and the mix of programs to which such funding is allocated, is subject to periodic congressional appropriation actions, including the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, and is subject to change at any time.

U.S. Government related sales from our reporting segments for fiscal year 20122013 and fiscal year 20112012 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Direct U.S. Indirect U.S.     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Government Government Commercial   

Direct U.S. Government Sales

 

Indirect U.S. Government Sales

 

Commercial Sales

 

Total

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

104,410 

 

$

289,197 

 

$

667,870 

 

$

1,061,477 

Energy

 

3,649 

 

 

8,106 

 

 

862,744 

 

 

874,499 

Total net external sales

$

108,059 

 

$

297,303 

 

$

1,530,614 

 

$

1,935,976 

Percentage of total net sales

 

%

 

 

15 

%

 

 

79 

%

 

 

100 

%

  Sales Sales Sales Total 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2012

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $78,075   $254,636   $563,372   $896,083  

$

78,075 

 

$

254,636 

 

$

563,372 

 

$

896,083 

Energy

   3,904    7,228    958,412    969,544  

 

3,904 

 

 

7,228 

 

 

958,412 

 

 

969,544 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net external sales

  $81,979   $261,864   $1,521,784   $1,865,627  

$

81,979 

 

$

261,864 

 

$

1,521,784 

 

$

1,865,627 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Percentage of total net sales

   4  14  82  100

 

%

 

 

14 

%

 

 

82 

%

 

 

100 

%

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2011

     

Aerospace

  $67,116   $252,462   $523,454   $843,032  

Energy

   3,448    7,530    857,692    868,670  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net external sales

  $70,564   $259,992   $1,381,146   $1,711,702  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Percentage of total net sales

   4  15  81  100
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

6


Manufacturing

We operate manufacturing and assembly plants in the United States, Europe, and Asia.  Our products consist of mechanical, electronic and electromagnetic systems and components.

Aluminum, iron and steel are primary raw materials used to produce our mechanical components.  Other commodities, such as gold, copper and nickel, are also used in the manufacture of our products, although in much smaller quantities.  We purchase various goods, including component parts and services used in production, logistics and product development processes from third parties.  Generally there are numerous sources for the raw materials and components used in our products, which we believe are sufficiently available to meet current requirements.

In August of 2012, the SEC issued a final rule implementing Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that imposes reporting requirements on issuers who use or may use “Conflict Minerals,“conflict minerals,” defined as columbite-tantalite (the metal ore from which tantalum is extracted), cassiterite (the metal ore from which tin is extracted),  gold, and wolframite (the metal ore from which tungsten is extracted), or their derivatives, originating from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighboring countries (collectively, “covered countries”). The rule was mandated in response to humanitarian concerns that trade in conflict minerals is used to finance armed groups in the covered countries. The rule describes assessment and reporting requirements for all issuers for which conflict minerals originating in a covered country are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by the issuer. Such issuers are required to file a newly created Form SD annually by May 31 forwith the prior calendar year.SEC.  Initial Form SDs are required to be filed by May 31, 2014 for the calendar year 2013.  We are currently in the process of assessing whether the Company will be required to file a Form SD for calendar year 2013, and we are implementing necessary processes and procedures to collect information necessary to make any required filing.Form SD filing in May 2014.  We do not anticipate that anythe requirement to file this newthe Form SD will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We maintain global strategic sourcing models to meet our global facilities’facilities' production needs while building long-term supplier relationships and efficiently managing our overall supply costs.  We expect our suppliers to maintain adequate levels of quality raw materials and component parts, and to deliver such parts on a timely basis to support production of our various products.  We use a variety of agreements with suppliers intended to protect our intellectual property and processes and to monitor and mitigate risks of disruption in our supply base that could cause a business disruption to our production schedules or to our customers.  The risks monitored include supplier financial viability, business continuity, quality, delivery and protection of our intellectual property and processes.

Our customers expect us to maintain adequate levels of certain finished goods and certain component parts to support our warranty commitments and sales to our aftermarket customers, and to deliver such parts on a timely basis to support our customers’ standard and customary needs.  We carry certain finished goods and component parts in inventory to meet these rapid delivery requirements of our customers.

Research and Development

We finance our research and development activities primarily with our own independent research and development funds, but in some cases research and development costs are shared by the customer.  Our research and development costs include basic research, applied research, development, systems and other concept formulation studies. We also conduct research and development activities aimed at improving our manufacturing processes.

Company funded expenditures related to new product development activities are expensed as incurred and are separately reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings.  Across both of our segments, research and development costs totaled $130,250 in fiscal year 2013, $143,274 in fiscal year 2012, and  $115,633 in fiscal year 2011, and $82,560 in fiscal year 2010.2011.  Research and development costs were 7.7%6.7% of consolidated net sales in fiscal year 20122013 compared to 7.7% in fiscal year 2012 and 6.8% in fiscal year 2011 and 5.7% in fiscal year 2010.2011.  See “Research and development costs” in Note 1,Operations and summary of significant accounting policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Aerospaceis focused on developing systems and components that we believe will be instrumental in helping our customers achieve their objectives of lower fuel consumption, lighter weight, more efficient performance, reduced emissions, and improved operating economics.  Our development efforts support technology for a wide range of:

·

aerospace turbine applications, including commercial, business and military engines of various thrust classes;

·

electromechanical and hydraulic actuation systems for flight deck-to-flight surface control of fixed-wing aircraft and rotorcraft, and turbine engine nacelles, as well as guidance for weapon systems; and

·

aerospace turbine applications, including commercial, business and military engines of various thrust classes;

electromechanical and hydraulic actuation systems for cockpit-to-flight surface control of fixed-wing aircraft and rotorcraft, as well as for weapon systems; and

motion control components for integration into comprehensive actuation systems.

The aerospace industry is moving toward more electronic (“fly-by-wire”), lighter weight aircraft, while demanding increased reliability and redundancy.  In response, we are developing an expanded family of intelligent cockpitflight deck control products (including throttle and rudder controls) with both conventional and fly-by-wire technology as well as motor driven actuation systems.

7


We collaborate closely with our customers in the early stages of a project as they develop their new product concepts.  We believe this collaboration allows us to develop technology that is aligned with our customers’ needs and therefore, increases the likelihood that our systems and components will be selected for inclusion in the platforms developed by our customers.  We believe our close collaboration with our customers during preliminary design stages allows us to provide products that deliver the component and system performance necessary for our customers’ product.products. 

Some technology development programs begin years before an expected entry to service, such as those for the next-generation of commercial aircraft engines.  Other development programs result in nearer-term product launches associated with new OEM offerings, product upgrades, or product replacements on existing programs.

We are currently developing the fuel system, air management, and actuation hardware for CFM International’s LEAP-XLEAP engine program, and severalactuation system, combustion system and oil system components (including fuel nozzles, high- and low-pressure stator vane actuators, a bleed valve actuator, an oil valve package, a fuel flow divider, and return-to-tank valves) for the newest models of Pratt & Whitney’s PurePower engine program.  These programs target applications in the single-aisle aircraft market with expected entry into service in the 20162015 to 2017 timeframe.  Both the LEAP-XLEAP engine and the PurePower engine have been selected by Airbus as options for its re-engined A320neo aircraft.  In addition, the LEAP-XLEAP engine has been selected exclusively by Comac for its C919 aircraft and by Boeing for its re-engined 737 MAX and theby Comac for its C919 aircraft.  The PurePower engine has been selected exclusively by Irkut for the MS-21 aircraft.    In addition, we are the selected supplier for the thrust reverse actuation system for the Boeing 737 MAX and the LEAP engined Airbus A320neo.   

We are also currently developing the fuel system, air management, and actuation hardware for the Passport 20 engine program, as well as the thrust reverser actuation system for the integrated propulsion system.  Passport is the next-generation GE Aviation engine for the large business aviation market, and GE Aviation’s NG34 technology development program, which will advance technology for the next generation CF34 engine for regional jets.has been selected by Bombardier selected the Passport 20 engine to power its Global 7000 and 8000 long-range business aircraft, targeting entry into service in 2016 and 2017, respectively.

In addition, we are currently developing sensor solutions for the Airbus A350 high lift system, an actuation sub-system for the Boeing 787-9 that improves fuel burn, flight deck components for the Bombardier CSeries and Global 7000 and 8000 aircraft, and control and sensing solutions for the KC-46 tanker boom subsystem.

Energyis focused on developing more efficient, cleaner technologies, including integrated control systems and system components that we believe will allow our OEM customers to cost-effectively meet mandated emissions regulations and fuel efficiency demands, allow for usage of a wider range of fuel sources, support global infrastructure requirements, and safely distribute and store power on the electrical grid.  Our development efforts support technology for a wide range of:

power converters for multi-megawatt (where megawatt is referred to as “MW”) class wind turbines in the power range of 1MW to 6MW, both for on-shore and off-shore-applications;

·

engines and turbines used for propulsion of mobile, marine and industrial equipment;

power converters for multi-MW solar farms in the power range of 100kW to 2.5MW;

·

industrial gas and steam turbines;

power converters for energy storage and micro-grids in the power range of 100kW to 6.0MW;

·

engines and turbines that drive pumps, generators and compressors;

distributed generator system (“Genset”) controls;

·

power converters for multi-megawatt (where megawatt is referred to as “MW”) class wind turbines in the power range of 1MW to 6MW, both for on-shore and off-shore-applications;

controls for switchgear;

·

distributed generator system (“Genset”) controls;

new generation of protection and control relays for medium-voltage applications;

·

controls for switchgear;

modernization of the self powered protection relay lines;

·

new generation of protection and control relays for medium-voltage applications;

industrial gas and steam turbines;

·

modernization of the self powered protection relay lines; and

industrial compressors;

engines and turbines driving pumps, generators and compressors; and

engines and turbines used for propulsion of mobile, marine and industrial equipment.

·

industrial compressors.

Our clean technology development efforts include controls for diesel, natural gas, alternative and alternativedual fuel engines, and full-scale as well as Doubly Fed Induction Generator converters.  Major development projects, including diesel common rail systems and air and gaseous fuel systems, and automated diesel particulate regeneration systems, are targeted for future global emissions regulations for the yearexpected to become effective in 2015 and beyond.or thereafter.

We believe that our technologies make marine and industrial power generation and distribution, and alternativealternatively fueled bus, truck and ship engines, operate cleaner, more efficiently, and more reliably.

Competitive Environment

Our products and product support services are sold worldwide into a variety of competitive markets.  In all markets, we compete on the basis of differentiated technology and design, product performance and conformity with customer specifications, customer service and support, including on-time delivery and customer partnering, product quality, price, reputation and local presence.  Both of our segments operate in uniquely competitive environments.

We believe that new competitors face significant barriers to entry into many of our markets, including various government mandated certification requirements to compete in the aerospace markets in which we participate.

8


Aerospaceindustry safety regulations and manufacturing standards demand significant product certification requirements, which form a basis for competition as well as a barrier to entry.  Technological innovation and design, product performance and conformity with customer specifications, and product quality and reliability are of significant importance in the aerospace and defense industry.  In addition, on-time delivery, pricing, and joint development capabilities with customers are points of competition within this market.  Our customers include airframe and aircraft engine OEM manufacturers and suppliers to these manufacturers.  We supply these customers with technologically innovative componentssystem and systemcomponent solutions and align our technology roadmaps with our customers, andcustomers.  We focus on responding to needs for reduced cost and weight, emission control and reliability improvements.  Our products achieve high levels of field reliability, which we believe offers an advantage in life-cycle cost.  We compete with numerous companies around the world that specialize in fuel and air management, combustion, and electronic control products.  In addition, many of our OEM customers are capable of developing and manufacturing these same products internally.

Our competitors in aerospace include divisions of UTC Aerospace Systems, Honeywell, Moog and Parker Hannifin.  We address competition in aftermarket service through responsiveness to our customers’ needs, providing short turnaround times and a global presence.

Several competitors are also customers for our products, such as UTC Aerospace Systems, Parker Hannifin, and Honeywell.  Some of our customers are affiliated with our competitors through ownership or joint venture agreements.  We compete in part by establishing relationships with our customers’ engineering organizations, and by offering innovative solutions to their market requirements.

Energyoperates in the global markets for industrial turbine engines, industrial reciprocating engine combustion and management systems, including emissions control, fuel and air management, combustion, electronic control products, power generation and distribution (through a global network of sales and support services), and converter technology for on-shore and off-shore wind turbines ranging in capacity from 1MW to 6MW.

We compete with numerous companies who specialize in various engine management products, and our OEM customers are often capable of developing and manufacturing some of these same products internally.  Many of our OEM customers are large global OEMs that require suppliers to be able to support them around the world and meet increasingly higher requirements in terms of quality, delivery, reliability and cost improvements.

Competitors include HeinzmannGmbH & Co., Robert Bosch AG, L’Orange GmbH, Hoerbiger, GE Multilin, ABB, Siemens, Schweitzer Electric, Areva and Ingeteam.  OEM customers with internal capabilities for similar products include General Electric, Caterpillar, Wartsila and Cummins.

We believe we are a market leader in providing our customers advanced technology and superior product performance at a competitive price.  We focus on close relationships with our OEM customers’ engineering teams.  Competitive success is based on the development of innovative components and systems that are aligned with the OEMs’ technology roadmaps to achieve future emission, efficiency, and fuel flexibility targets.

The global market for renewable wind and solar energy technology is immature and changing rapidly.  Delays in wind turbine installation caused by continued tight global credit availability, and uncertainty with respect to incentives and the overall economic environment, have led to over-capacity with manufacturers within the wind turbine industry.  Market consolidation continues to occur and price has become an important factor within the wind turbine converter market.

Employees

As of October 31, 2012,2013, we employedapproximately 6,6006,750 full-time employees of which approximately 1,800 were located outside of the United States.  We consider the relationships with our employees to be positive.good.

Approximately 13%16% of our total full-time workforce waswere union employees as of October 31, 2012,2013, all of whom work for our Aerospace segment.  The collective bargaining agreements with our union employees are generally renewed through contract renegotiation near the contract expiration dates.  The MPC Employees Representative Union contract, which covers 457455 employees as of October 31, 2012,2013, expires September 30, 2013.2017.  The Local Lodge 727-N International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers agreement, which covers 395384 employees as of October 31, 2012,2013, expires April 20, 2014.  The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Local No. 509 agreement, which covers 221 employees as of October 31, 2013, expires June 3, 2017.  We believe our relationships with our employees and the representative unions are good.

All of our other employees in the United States were at-will employees as of October 31, 2012. Generally, our employees are2013, and therefore, not subject to any type of employment contract or agreement.  Prior to the acquisition of MPC Products Corporation (“MPC Products”), and Techni-Core, Inc. (“Techni-Core” and, together with MPC Products, “MPC”), certain MPC employees who are not executive officers of Woodward had pre-existing employment agreements with MPC. These agreements expired in October 2011. In addition, ourOur executive officers and our other corporate officers each have change-in-control agreements.

9


Outside of the United States, we enter into employment contracts and agreements in those countries in which such relationships are mandatory or customary.  The provisions of these agreements correspond in each case with the required or customary terms in the subject jurisdiction.

Patents, Intellectual Property, and Licensing

We own numerous patents and have licenses for the use of patents owned by others, which relate to our products and their manufacture.  In addition to owning a large portfolio of intellectual property, we also license intellectual property to and from third parties.  For example, the U.S. Government has certain rights in our patents and other intellectual property developed in performance of certain government contracts, and it may use or authorize others to use the inventions covered by such patents for government purposes as allowed by law.  Unpatented process technology, including research, development and engineering technical skills and know-how, as well as unpatented production software and other intellectual property rights, are important to our overall business and to the operations of each of our segments.  While our intellectual property assets taken together are important, we do not believe our business or either of our segments would be materially affected by the expiration of any particular intellectual property right or termination of any particular intellectual property patent license agreement.

As of September 30, 2012,2013, our Consolidated Balance Sheet includes $235,563$285,775 of net intangible assets.  This value represents the carrying values, net of amortization, of certain assets acquired in various business acquisitions and does not purport to represent the fair value of our intellectual property as of September 30, 2012.2013.  

U.S. GAAP requires that research and development costs be expensed as incurred; therefore, as we develop new intellectual property in the normal course of business, the costs of developing such assets are expensed as incurred, with no corresponding intangible asset recorded.

Environmental Matters and Climate Change

The Company is regulated by federal, state and international environmental laws governing our use, transport and disposal of substances and control of emissions.  Compliance with these existing laws has not had a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or global competitive position.

We are engaged in remedial activities, generally in coordination with other companies, pursuant to federal and state laws.  When it is reasonably probable we will pay remediation costs at a site, and those costs can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for such future costs with a related charge against our earnings.  In formulating that estimate and recognizing those costs, we do not consider amounts expected to be recovered from insurance companies, or others, until such recovery is assured.  Our accrued liability for environmental remediation costs is not significant and is included in the line item “Accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

We generally cannot reasonably estimate costs at sites in the very early stages of remediation.  Currently, we have one site in the later stages of remediation, and there is no more than a remote chance that remediation costs at any individual site, or at all sites in the aggregate, will be material.

Our manufacturing facilities generally do not produce significant volumes or quantities of byproducts, including greenhouse gases, that would be considered hazardous waste or otherwise harmful to the environment.  We do not expect legislation currently pending or expected in the next several years to have a significant negative impact on our operations in any of our segments.

Domestic and foreign legislative initiatives on emissions control, renewable energy, and climate change tend to favorably impact the sale of our energy control products.  For example, our Energy segment produces inverters for wind turbines and energy control products that help our customers maximize engine efficiency and minimize wasteful emissions, including greenhouse gases.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Information about our executive officers is provided below.  There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers listed below.

Thomas A. Gendron,Age 51.52. Chairman of the Board since January 2008; Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director since July 2005; Chief Operating Officer and President September 2002 through June 2005; Vice President and General Manager of Industrial Controls June 2001 through September 2002; Vice President of Industrial Controls April 2000 through May 2001; Director of Global Marketing and Industrial Controls’ Business Development February 1999 through March 2000.

10


Robert F. Weber, Jr.,Age 58.59.  Vice Chairman, Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer since September 2011, and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since August 2005.  Prior to August 2005, Mr. Weber was employed at Motorola, Inc. for 17 years, where he held various positions, including Corporate Vice President and General Manager—Manager - EMEA Auto.  Prior to this role, Mr. Weber served in a variety of financial positions at both a corporate and operating unit level with Motorola.

Martin V. Glass, Age 57.56.  President, Airframe Systems since April 2011; President, Turbine Systems October 2009 through April 2011; Group Vice President, Turbine Systems September 2007 through September 2009; Vice President of the Aircraft Engine Systems Customer Business Segment December 2002 through August 2007; Director of Sales, Marketing, and Engineering February 2000 through December 2002.

Gerhard LaufferSagar Patel, Age 51. President, Electrical Power Systems from October 2009 through September 2012; Group Vice President, Electrical Power Systems September 2007 through September 2009; Vice President and General Manager Electronic Controls March 2002 through August 2007; Managing Director Leonhard-Reglerbau GmbH 1991 through March 2002 when it was acquired by Woodward.

Sagar Patel, Age 46.47.  President, Aircraft Turbine Systems since June 2011.  Prior to this role, Mr. Patel was employed at General Electric for 18 years, most recently serving as President, Mechanical Systems, GE Aviation, from March 2009 through June 2010.  He served as President, Aerostructures, GE Aviation from July 2008 through July 2009 and as President and General Manager, MRS Systems, Inc., BE Aircraft Engines, from October 2005 through June 2008.

Chad R. Preiss, Age 47.48.  President, Engine Systems since October 2009; Group Vice President, Engine Systems October 2008 through September 2009; Vice President, Sales, Service, and Marketing, Engine Systems December 2007 through September 2008; and Vice President, Industrial Controls September 2004 through December 2007.  Prior to this role, Mr. Preiss served in a variety of engineering and marketing/sales management roles, including Director of Business Development, since joining Woodward in 1988.

James D. Rudolph, Age 51.52.  President, Industrial Turbomachinery since April 2011; Corporate Vice President, Global Sourcing October 2009 through April 2011; Vice President, Global Sourcing April 2009 through October 2009; Director of Global Sourcing April 2005 through April 2009; Director of Engineering for Industrial Controls March 2000 through April 2005.  Prior to March 2000, Mr. Rudolph served in a variety of engineering, operations and sales roles since joining the company in 1984.

A. Christopher Fawzy,Age 43.44.  Corporate Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer since October 2009; Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary June 2007 through September 2009.  Mr. Fawzy became the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer in August 2009.  Prior to joining Woodward, Mr. Fawzy was employed by Mentor Corporation, a global medical device company.  He joined Mentor in 2001 and served as Corporate Counsel, then General Counsel in 2003, and was appointed Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in 2004.

Other Corporate Officers of the Registrant

Information about our other corporate officers is provided below. There are no family relationships between any of the corporate officers listed below or between any of the corporate officers listed below and the aforementioned executive officers.

Harlan G. Barkley, Age 59.60. Corporate Vice President, Information Technology since October 2009; Vice President, Information Technology April 2009 through September 2009; Director, Global Information Technology November 2002 through March 2009.  Prior to joining Woodward in October 1999, Mr. Barkley was employed by Sundstrand Corporation/Hamilton Sundstrand for 19 years in a variety of leadership roles in information technology.

Steven J. Meyer, Age 52.53. Corporate Vice President, Human Resources since October 2009; Vice President, Human Resources November 2006 through September 2009;  Director, Global Human Resources November 2002 through October 2006;  Director, Human Resources for Industrial Controls July 1997 through October 2002.  Prior to joining Woodward, Mr. Meyer was employed by PG&E Corporation and Nortel in a variety of roles in human resources.

Matthew F. Taylor,Age 50.51. Corporate Vice President, Global SourcingSupply Chain since February 2011; Vice President, Engine Fluid Systems and Controls Center of Excellence (“CoE”) October 2009 through February 2011; General Manager, Fluid Systems and Controls CoE December 2006 through October 2009; Director of Operations, Fluid Systems and Controls June 2005 through December 2006.  Prior to joining Woodward in June 2005, Mr. Taylor was the Vice President and General Manager, Warner Electric and served in a variety of general management roles at Eaton Corporation from February 1998 through August 2003.

Information available on Woodward’s Website

Through a link on the Investor Information section of our website, www.woodward.com, we make available the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed or furnished to the SEC: our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  None of the information contained on our website is incorporated into this document by reference.

11


Stockholders may obtain, without charge, a single copy of Woodward’s 20122013 Annual Report on Form 10-K upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, Woodward, Inc., 1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

Item 1A.Risk Factors

Investment in our securities involves risk.  An investor or potential investor should consider the risks summarized in this section when making investment decisions regarding our securities.

Important factors that could individually, or together with one or more other factors, affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and/or cash flows include, but are not limited to, the following:

Company Risks

A decline in business with, or financial distress of, our significant customers could decrease our consolidated net sales or impair our ability to collect amounts due and payable and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We have fewer customers than many companieswith similar sales volumes.  For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012,2013, approximately 36%39% of our consolidated net sales were made to our five largest customers.  Sales to these same five largest customers represented approximately 33%36% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.2012.  Sales to our largest customer, General Electric, accounted for approximately 14%15%,  14%, and 15%14% of consolidated net sales in each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010,2011, respectively, and accounts receivable from General Electric represented approximately 10%11% and 11%10% of accounts receivable at September 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively.  Sales to our next largest customer in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 accounted for approximately 6%7%,  3%6%, and 3% of consolidated net sales in each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010,2011, respectively.  If any of our significant customers were to change suppliers, in-source production, institute significant restructuring or cost-cutting measures, or experience financial distress, including that which is a result of the prolonged unfavorable economic conditions and continued instability in the financial markets, these significant customers may substantially reduce or otherwise be unable to pay for purchases from us.  Accordingly, our consolidated net sales could decrease significantly or we may experience difficulty collecting or be unable to collect amounts due and payable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The continued instability in the financial markets sovereign credit rating downgrades and uncertainty surrounding European sovereign and other debt defaults, and prolonged unfavorablecontinued global economic conditionsuncertainty could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our customers to perform their obligations to us and on their demand for our products and services.

There has been widespread concern over the continued instability in the financial markets and their influence on the global economy.  As a result of the extreme volatility in the credit and capital markets, sovereign credit rating downgrades and uncertainty surrounding European sovereign and other debt defaults, and other prolongedcontinued global economic challenges currently affecting the global economy,uncertainty, our current or potential customers may experience cash flow problems and, as a result, may modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our products.  Additionally, if customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or are precluded from securing necessary financing, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts receivable that are owed to us.  Any inability of current or potential customers to pay us for our products may adversely affect our earnings and cash flows.

In addition, the general economic environment significantly affects demand for our products and services.  During periodsPeriods of slowing economic activity, such as the prolonged unfavorableglobal economic conditions we have recently experienced asince 2008, may cause global slowdownor regional slowdowns in spending on infrastructure development may occur in the markets in which we operate, and customers may reduce their purchases of our products and services.  For example, the impact of the unfavorable market conditions, in addition to reduced government subsidies, is currently evident in our renewable power business where customers are reducing or limiting spending and investing and lending institutions are more restrictive in funding renewable energy projects.  In addition, unfavorable economic conditions regarding the use of business jets have reduced demand for systems and components for new business jet aircraft in some markets. Anycould cause a reduction in aircraft order flow or withdrawal from service of business jet andor commercial aircraft, which could further reduce demand for some of our Aerospace products and services.

There can be no assurance that the prolonged unfavorablecurrent market and economic and market conditionsuncertainty in the United States and internationally will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We may not be able to obtain financing, on acceptable terms or at all, to implement our business plans, complete acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.

Global financial markets, including the credit and debt and equity capital markets, and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, disrupted and volatile. The credit and debt and equity capital markets have been distressed.  These issues, along with significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk, sovereign credit rating downgrades and uncertainty surrounding European sovereign and other debt defaults, and the prolongedcurrent global economic challenges,uncertainty, have made, and will likely continue to make, it difficult to obtain

12


financing.  In addition, as a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets has generally increasedmay increase as many lenders and

institutional investors have increasedor may increase interest rates, enactedenact tighter lending standards, refusedrefuse to refinance existing debt at maturity either at all or on terms similar to existing debt, and reducedreduce and, in some cases, ceasedcease to provide financing to borrowers.  Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that financing, to the extent needed, will be available on acceptable terms or at all.  If financing is not available when needed, or is available only on unacceptable terms, we may be unable to implement our business plans, complete acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The long sales cycle, customer evaluation process and implementation period of our products and services may increase the costs of obtaining orders and reduce the predictability of sales cycles and our inventory requirements.

Our products and services are technologically complex.  Prospective customers generally must commit significant resources to test and evaluate our products and to install and integrate them into larger systems.  Orders expected in one quarter may shift to another quarter or be cancelled with little advance notice as a result of customers’ budgetary constraints, internal acceptance reviews and other factors affecting the timing of customers’ purchase decisions.  In addition, customers often require a significant number of product presentations and demonstrations before reaching a sufficient level of confidence in the product’s performance and compatibility with the approvals that typically accompany capital expenditure approval processes.  The difficulty in forecasting demand increases the challenge in anticipating sales cycles and our inventory requirements, which may cause us to over-produce finished goods and could result in inventory write-offs, or could cause us to under-produce finished goods.  Any such over-production or under-production could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We have engaged in restructuring and alignment activities from time to time and may need to implement further restructurings or alignments in the future, and there can be no assurance that our restructuring or alignment efforts will have the intended effects.

From time to time, we have responded to changes in our industry and the markets we serve by restructuring or aligning our operations.  Our restructuring activities have included workforce management and other restructuring charges related to our recently acquired businesses, including, among others, changes associated with integrating similar operations, managing our workforce, vacating or consolidating certain facilities and cancelling certain contracts.  Most recently, we made a decision during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 to align our renewable power business appropriately to the current environment and the foreseeable future, through revaluation of its assets and liabilities, including workforce management actions.  Based on cost reduction measures or changes in the industry and markets in which we compete, we may decide to implement further restructuring or alignment activities in the future, such as closing plants, moving production lines, or making additions, reductions or other changes to our management or workforce.

Restructuring and/or alignment activities can create unanticipated consequences, and we cannot be sure that any restructuring or alignment efforts that we undertake will be successful.  A variety of risks could cause us not to realize an expected cost savings, including, among others, the following:

·

higher than expected severance costs related to staff reductions;

·

higher than expected retention costs for employees that will be retained;

·

higher than expected stand-alone overhead expenses;

·

delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost-saving plan; and

·

other unexpected costs associated with operating the business.

If we are unable to structure our operations in the light of evolving market conditions, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Suppliers may be unable to provide us with materials of sufficient quality or quantity required to meet our production needs at favorable prices or at all.

We are dependent upon suppliers for parts and raw materials used in the manufacture of components that we sell to our customers, and our raw material costs are subject to commodity market fluctuations.  We may experience an increase in costs for parts or raw materials that we source from our suppliers, or we may experience a shortage of parts or raw materials for various reasons, such as the loss of a significant supplier, high overall demand creating shortages in parts and supplies we use, financial distress, work stoppages, natural disasters, fluctuations in commodity prices, or production difficulties that may affect one or more of our suppliers.  In particular, current or future global economic uncertainty may affect our key suppliers in terms of their operating cash flow and access to financing.  This may in turn affect their ability to perform their obligations to us.  Our customers rely on us to provide on-time delivery and have certain rights if our delivery standards are not

13


maintained.  A significant increase in our supply costs, including for raw materials that are subject to commodity price fluctuations, or a protracted interruption of supplies for any reason, could result in the delay of one or more of our customer contracts or could damage our reputation and relationships with customers.  In addition, quality and sourcing issues that our suppliers may experience can also adversely affect the quality and effectiveness of our products and services and may result in liability or reputational harm to us.  Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our profitability may suffer if we are unable to manage our expenses or if we experience change in product mix as a result of sales increases or decreases.

Some of our expenses are relatively fixed in relation to changes in sales volume and are difficult to adjust in the short term.  Expenses such as depreciation or amortization, which are the result of past capital expenditures or business acquisitions, or expenses driven by business activity other than sales level, such as manufacturing overhead, may be difficult to reduce in a timely manner in response to a reduction in sales.  Due to the nature of our sales cycle, in periods of sales increases it may be difficult to rapidly increase our production of finished goods, particularly if such sales increases are unanticipated.  An increase in the production of our finished goods requires increases in both the purchases of raw materials and components and in the size of our workforce.  If a sudden, unanticipated need for raw materials, components and labor should arise in order to meet unexpected sales demand, we could experience difficulties in sourcing raw materials, components and labor at a favorable cost or to meet our production needs.  These factors could result in delays in fulfilling customer sales contracts, damage to our reputation and relationships with our customers, an inability to meet the demands of the marketmarkets that we serve, which in turn could prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities or responding to competitive pressures, and result in an increase in variable and fixed costs leading to a decrease in net earnings or even net losses.  In addition, we sell products that have varying profit margins, and increases or decreases in sales of our various products may change the mix of products that we sell during any period.  Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Subcontractors may fail to perform contractual obligations.

We frequently subcontract portions of work due under contracts with our customers and are dependent on the continued availability and satisfactory performance by these subcontractors.  Nonperformance or underperformance by subcontractors could materially impact our ability to perform obligations to our customers.  A subcontractor’s failure to perform could result in a customer terminating our contract for default, expose us to liability, substantially impair our ability to compete for future contracts and orders, and limit our ability to enforce fully all of our rights under these agreements, including any rights to indemnification.  Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our product development activities may not be successful, or may be more costly than currently anticipated.anticipated, or we may not be able to produce newly developed products at a cost that meets the anticipated product cost structure.

Our business involves a significant level of product development activities, generally in connection with our customers’ development activities.  Industry standards, customer expectations, or other products may emerge that could render one or more of our products or services less desirable or obsolete.  Maintaining our market position requires continued investment in research and development.  During an economic downturn or a subsequent recovery, we may need to maintain our investment in research and development, which may limit our ability to reduce these expenses in proportion to a sales shortfall.  In addition, increased investments in research and development may divert resources from other potential investments in our business, such as acquisitions or investments in our facilities, processes and operations.  If these activities are not as successful as currently anticipated, are not completed on a timely basis, or are more costly than currently anticipated, or if we are not able to develop newproduce newly developed products at a cost that meets the anticipated product cost structure, then our future sales, margins and/or earnings could be lower than expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Activities necessary to integrate acquisitions may result in costs in excess of current expectations or be less successful than anticipated.

We recently completed an acquisition in fiscal year 20112013 and we may acquire other businesses in the future.  The success of these transactions will depend on, among other things, our ability to integrate assets and personnel acquired in these transactions and to apply our internal controls process to these acquired businesses.  The integration of these acquisitions may require significant attention from our management, and the diversion of management’s attention and resources could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manage our business.  In addition, we may incur unanticipated costs or expenses following an acquisition, including post-closing asset impairment charges, expenses associated with eliminating duplicate facilities, and other liabilities.

The risks associated with our past or future acquisitions also include, among others, the following:

14


·

technological and product synergies, economies of scale and cost reductions may not occur as expected;

·

unforeseen expenses, delays or conditions may be imposed upon the acquisition, including due to required regulatory approvals or consents;

·

we may acquire or assume unexpected liabilities or be subject to unexpected penalties or other enforcement actions;

·

inaccurate assumptions may be made regarding the integration process;

·

unforeseen difficulties may arise in integrating operations, processes and systems;

·

higher than expected investments may be required to implement necessary compliance processes and related systems, including information technology systems, accounting systems and internal controls over financial reporting;

·

we may fail to retain, motivate and integrate key management and other employees of the acquired business;

·

higher than expected costs may arise due to unforeseen changes in tax, trade, environmental, labor, safety, payroll or pension policies in any jurisdiction in which the acquired business conducts its operations; and

·

we may experience problems in retaining customers and integrating customer bases.

Many of these factors will be outside of our control and any one of them could result in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and attention. Furthermore, we may not realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipate when we first enter into these transactions.  If actual integration costs are higher than amounts assumed, if we are unableFailure to integrate the assets and personnelimplement our acquisition strategy, including successfully integrating acquired in an acquisition as anticipated, or if we are unable to fully benefit from anticipated synergies,businesses, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.flows.

Our debt obligations and the restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our debt could limit our ability to operate our business or pursue our business strategies, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

As of September 30, 2012,2013, our total long-term debt was $391,875,$550,000, and we had $329 inno short-term borrowings outstanding.  Our debt obligations could require us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, reducing the availability of our cash flow for other purposes, including business development efforts and mergers and acquisitions.  We are contractually obligated under the agreements governing our long-term debt to make principal payments of $7,500 in fiscal year 2013, $134,375$100,000 in fiscal year 2014, $0 in fiscal year 2015, and $250,000$107,000 in fiscal year 2016, $0 in fiscal year 2017 and $343,000 in fiscal year 2018 and thereafter.  Our debt obligations could make us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions and could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industryindustries in which we operate, thereby placing us at a disadvantage to our competitors that have less indebtedness.

Our existing term loan facility, revolving credit facility, line of credit, and note purchase agreements impose financial covenants on us and our subsidiaries that require us to maintain certain leverage ratios and minimum levels of consolidated net worth.  Certain of these agreements require us to repay outstanding borrowings with portions of the proceeds we receive from certain sales of property or assets and specified future debt offerings.

These financial covenants place certain restrictions on our business that may affect our ability to execute our business strategy successfully or take other actions that we believe would be in the best interests of our Company.  These restrictions include limitations or restrictions, among other things, on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:

incur additional indebtedness;

·

incur additional indebtedness; 

pay dividends or make distributions on our capital stock or certain other restricted payments or investments;

·

pay dividends or make distributions on our capital stock or certain other restricted payments or investments; 

purchase or redeem stock;

·

purchase or redeem stock; 

issue stock of our subsidiaries;

·

issue stock of our subsidiaries; 

make domestic and foreign investments and extend credit;

·

make domestic and foreign investments and extend credit; 

engage in transactions with affiliates;

·

engage in transactions with affiliates; 

transfer and sell assets;

·

transfer and sell assets; 

·

effect a consolidation or merger or sell, transfer, lease, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and

·

create liens on our assets to secure debt.

These agreements contain certain customary events of default, including certain cross-default provisions related to other outstanding debt arrangements.  Any breach of the covenants under these agreements or other event of default could cause a default under these agreements and/or a cross-default under our other debt arrangements, which could restrict our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility.  If there were an event of default under certain provisions of our debt arrangements that was not cured or waived, the holders of the defaulted debt may be able to cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt instrument to be due and payable immediately.  Our assets and cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default.  If we are unable to

15


repay, refinance, or restructure our indebtedness as required, or amend the covenants contained in these agreements, the lenders or note holders may be entitled to obtain a lien or institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets.  Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our business may be affected by government contracting risks.

Sales made directly to U.S. Government agencies and entities were 4%6% of total net sales during fiscal year 2012,2013, 4% during fiscal year 2011,2012, and 5%4% during fiscal year 2010,2011, primarily in the aerospace market.  Sales made directly to U.S. Government agencies and entities, or indirectly through third party manufacturers, such as tier-one prime contractors, utilizing Woodward parts and subassemblies, accounted for approximately 18%21% of total sales in fiscal year 2013, 18% in fiscal year 2012, and 19% in fiscal year 2011, and 23% in fiscal year 2010.2011.  Our contracts with the U.S. Government are subject to the following unique risks, some of which are beyond our control, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

 

The level of U.S. defense spending is subject to periodic congressional appropriation actions, including the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, and is subject to change at any time. The mix of programs to which such funding is allocated is also uncertain, and we can provide no assurance that an increase in defense spending will be allocated to programs that would benefit our business. If the amount of spending were to decrease, or there were a shift from certain aerospace and defense programs on which we have content to other programs on which we do not, our sales could decrease.

·

The level of U.S. defense spending is subject to periodic congressional appropriation actions, including significant reductions in defense spending under the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, and is subject to change at any time.  The mix of programs to which such funding is allocated is also uncertain, and we can provide no assurance that an increase in defense spending will be allocated to programs that would benefit our business.  If the amount of spending were to decrease, or there were a shift from certain aerospace and defense programs on which we have content to other programs on which we do not, our sales could decrease.  In addition, one or more of the aerospace or defense programs that we currently support could be phased-out or terminated.  Any such reductions in U.S. Government needs under these existing aerospace and defense programs, unless offset by other aerospace and defense programs and opportunities, could have a material adverse effect on our sales.

·

Our U.S. Government contracts and the U.S. Government contracts of our customers are subject to modification, curtailment or termination by the government, either for the convenience of the government or for default as a result of a failure by us or our customers to perform under the applicable contract.  If any of our contracts are terminated by the U.S. Government, our backlog would be reduced, in accordance with contract terms, by the expected value of the remaining work under such contracts.  In addition, we are not the prime contractor on most of our contracts for supply to the U.S. Government, and the U.S. Government could terminate a prime contract under which we are a subcontractor, irrespective of the quality of our products and services as a subcontractor.

·

We must comply with procurement laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of our U.S. Government contracts and the U.S. Government contracts of our customers.  The U.S. Government may change procurement laws and regulations from time to time.  A violation of U.S. Government procurement laws or regulations, a change in U.S. Government procurement laws and regulations, or a termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability, debarment, or suspension and could have an adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.

·

We are sometimes subject to government inquiries, audits and investigations due to our business relationships with the U.S. Government and the heavily regulated industries in which we do business.  In addition, our contract costs are subject to audits by the U.S. Government.  U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency and the Defense Contract Management Agency, routinely audit government contractors and subcontractors.  These agencies review our performance under contracts, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards, as well as the adequacy of and our compliance with our internal control systems and policies.  Any costs found to be misclassified or inaccurately allocated to a specific contract would be deemed non-reimbursable, and to the extent already reimbursed, would be refunded.  Any inadequacies in our systems and policies could result in withholds on billed receivables, penalties and reduced future business.    Any inquiries or investigations, including those related to our contract pricing, could potentially result in civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, suspension, and/or debarment from participating in future business opportunities with the U.S. Government.  Such actions could harm our reputation, even if such allegations are later determined to be unfounded,  and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.   

Our U.S. Government contracts and the U.S. Government contracts of our customers are subject to modification, curtailment or termination by the government, either for the convenience of the government or for default as a result of a failure by us or our customers to perform under the applicable contract. If any of our contracts are terminated by the U.S. Government, our backlog would be reduced, in accordance with contract terms, by the expected value of the remaining work under such contracts. In addition, we are not the prime contractor on most of our contracts for supply to the U.S. Government, and the U.S. Government could terminate a prime contract under which we are a subcontractor, irrespective of the quality of our products and services as a subcontractor.

We must comply with procurement laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of our U.S. Government contracts and the U.S. Government contracts of our customers. The U.S. Government may change procurement laws and regulations from time to time. A violation of U.S. Government procurement laws or regulations, a change in U.S. Government procurement laws and regulations, or a termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability, disbarment, or suspension and could have an adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.

Our disclosed contract costs are subject to audits by the U.S. Government, which could result in adjustments to those costs. If any audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, suspension, and/or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. Government.

Changes in the estimates of fair value of reporting units or of long-lived assets may result in future impairment charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and  cash flows.

Over time, the fair values of long-lived assets change.  At September 30, 2012,2013, we had $461,374$551,624 of goodwill, representing 25% of our total assets.  We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level or aggregated reporting unit level if aggregation is appropriate based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, on an annual basis and more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or aggregated reporting unit below its carrying amount.  Based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, we sometimes aggregate components

16


of a single operating segment into a reporting unit, if appropriate.   Future goodwill impairment charges may occur if estimates of fair values decrease, which would reduce future earnings.  We also test property, plant, and equipment and other intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  Future asset impairment charges may occur if asset utilization declines, if customer demand decreases, or for a number of other reasons, which would reduce future earnings.  Any such impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.  Impairment charges would also reduce our consolidated stockholders’ equity and increase our debt-to-total-capitalization ratio, which could negatively impact our credit rating and access to the debt and equity markets.

We completed our annual goodwill impairment test during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.2013.  In performing the annual goodwill impairment test, we determined it was appropriate to aggregate ourcertain components of the same operating segment into a single aggregated reporting units.unit.  The results of Woodward’sour fiscal year 20122013 annual goodwill impairment test performed as of July 31, 20122013 indicated the estimated fair values of each of our aggregated reporting units were in excess of their carrying amounts, and accordingly, no impairment existed.  There can be no assurance that Woodward’sour estimates and assumptions of the fair value of aggregatedour reporting units, the current economic environment, the level of U.S. defense spending, including the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, or the other inputs used in forecasting the present value of forecasted cash flows used to estimate the fair value of aggregatedour reporting units will prove to be accurate projections of future performance.

As part of our ongoing monitoring efforts, we will continue to consider the global economic environment and its potential impact on our businesses, as well as other factors, in assessing goodwill and long-lived assets for possible indications of impairment.

Future subsidiary resultsAdditional tax expense or changes in domestic or internationaladditional tax statutes may change the amount of valuation allowances provided for deferred income tax assets.exposures could affect our future profitability.

During fiscal year 2012, 50%2013, 45% of our external nettotal sales were made to customers in jurisdictions outside the United States. We establishStates (including products manufactured in the United States and sold outside the United States as well as products manufactured in international locations).  Accordingly, we are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various non-U.S. jurisdictions.  Our domestic and international tax liabilities are dependent upon the distribution of operating income among these different jurisdictions.  Our tax expense includes estimates of additional tax that may be incurred and reflects various estimates, projections, and assumptions that could impact the valuation allowances to reflectof our deferred tax assets.  Our future operating results could be adversely affected by changes in the estimated amounteffective tax rate, including effective tax rate changes as a result of a change in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates; changes in our overall profitability; changes in tax legislation and tax rates, as well as changes in applicable interest and penalties; changes in U.S. GAAP; changes in the projected realization of deferred tax assets that might not be realized. The underlying analysis is performed for individual tax jurisdictions, generally at a subsidiary level. Future subsidiary results, actual or forecasted, as well asand liabilities; changes to the relevant tax statutes, could change the outcome of our analysis and changein the amount of valuation allowances provided for deferred income tax assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,earnings permanently reinvested offshore; and the results of operations,audits and cash flows.examinations of previously filed tax returns and continuing assessments of our tax exposures.

Manufacturing activities may result in future environmental costs or liabilities.

We use hazardous materials and/or regulated materials in our manufacturing operations.  We also own, and operate, and may acquire facilities that were formerly owned and operated by others that used such materials.  The risk that a significant release of regulated materials has occurred in the past or will occur in the future cannot be completely eliminated or prevented.  As a result, we are subject to a substantial number of costly regulations.  In particular, we are required to comply with increasingly stringent requirements of federal, state, and local environmental, occupational health and safety laws and regulations in the United States, the European Union, and other territories, including those governing emissions to air, discharges to water, noise and odor emissions, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials, and the cleanup of contaminated properties and human health and safety.  Compliance with these laws and regulations results in ongoing costs.  We cannot be certain that we have been, or will at all times be, in complete compliance with all environmental requirements, or that we will not incur additional material costs or liabilities in connection with these requirements.  As a result, we may incur material costs or liabilities or be required to undertake future environmental remediation activities that could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our performance depends on continued access to a stable workforce and on favorable labor relations with our employees.

Certain of our operations in the United States and internationally involve different employee/employer relationships and the existence of works’ councils.  In addition, a portion of our workforce is unionized and is expected to remain unionized for the foreseeable future.  Competition for technical personnel in the industryindustries in which we compete is intense.  Our future success depends in part on our continued ability to hire, train, assimilate, and retain qualified personnel.  There is no assurance that we will continue to be successful in recruiting qualified employees in the future.  Any significant increases in labor costs, deterioration of employee relations, including any conflicts with works’ councils or unions, or slowdowns or work stoppages at any of our locations, whether due to employee turnover, changes in availability of qualified technical

17


personnel, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, our relationships with customers, and our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

AOperations and suppliers may be subject to physical and other risks, including natural disasterdisasters, that could disrupt production and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

CertainOur operations include principal facilities in the United States, China, Germany, and Poland. In addition, we operate sales and service facilities in Brazil, Bulgaria, India, Japan, the Netherlands, Peru, the Republic of our Aerospace segmentKorea, Russia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. We also have suppliers for materials and parts inside and outside the United States. Our operations are located in California. Historically, California has been susceptible to natural disasters, such asand sources of supply could be disrupted by unforeseen events, including fires, tornadoes, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and wildfires. These naturalother forms of severe weather in the United States or in other countries in which we operate or in which our suppliers are located, any of which could adversely affect our operations and financial performance.  Natural disasters, public health concerns, war, political unrest, terrorist activity, equipment failures, power outages, or other unforeseen events could harmresult in physical damage to, and complete or partial closure of, one or more of our manufacturing facilities, or could cause temporary or long-term disruption in the Californiasupply of component products from some local and international suppliers, disruption in the transport of our products and significant delays in the shipment of products and the provision of services, which could in turn cause the loss of sales and customers.  Existing insurance arrangements may not provide protection for all of the costs that may arise from such events.  Accordingly, disruption of our operations or the operations of our Aerospace segment through interference with communications, including the interruption or loss of its computer systems and the destruction of our facilities or our operational, financial and management information systems, which could prevent or impede us from processing and controlling the flow of business. Accordingly, any such natural disastera significant supplier could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to protect all our products or technologies.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents or rights to patents, protect trade secrets and know-how, and prevent others from infringing on our patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights.  Some of our intellectual property is not covered by any patent or patent application and includes trade secrets and other know-how that is not patentable or for which we have elected not to obtain a patent, including intellectual property relating to our manufacturing processes and engineering designs.  We will be able to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that it is covered by valid and enforceable patents, trademarks, or licenses.  Patent protection generally involves complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, enforceability of patent rights cannot be predicted with certainty; thus, any patents that we own or license from others may not provide us with adequate protection against competitors.  Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries do not recognize intellectual property rights or protect them to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.  Additionally, our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing upon the patent and other proprietary rights of others.  Our current or future technologies may, regardless of our intent, infringe upon the patents or violate other proprietary rights of third parties.  In the event of such infringement or violation, we may face expensive litigation or indemnification obligations and may be prevented from selling existing products and pursuing product development or commercialization.  If we are unable to sufficiently protect our patent and other proprietary rights or if we infringe on the patent or proprietary rights of others, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Product liability claims, product recalls or other liabilities associated with the products and services we provide may force us to pay substantial damage awards and other expenses that could exceed our accruals and insurance coverage.

The manufacture and sale of our products and the services we provide expose us to riskrisks of product liability and other tort claims.  BothWe currently have and have had in the past we have had product liability claims relating to our products, and we will likely be subject to additional product liability claims in the future for both past and current products, someproducts.  Some of whichthese claims may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  We also provide certain services to our customers and are subject to claims with respect to the services provided.  In providing such services, we may rely on subcontractors to perform all or a portion of the contracted services.  It is possible that we could be liable to our customers for work performed by a subcontractor.  Regardless of the outcome, product liability claims can be expensive to defend, can divert the attention of management and other personnel for significant periods of time, and can cause reputational damage.  While we believe that we have appropriate insurance coverage available to us related to any such claims, our insurance may not cover all liabilities or be available in the future at a cost acceptable to us.  IfAn unsuccessful result in connection with a product liability or other claim, or series of claims, including class action claims, is brought against us forwhere the liabilities that are not covered by insurance or for which indemnification or other recovery is not available, such claim could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Amounts accrued for contingencies may be inadequate to cover the amount of loss when the matters are ultimately resolved.

In addition to intellectual property and product liability matters, we are currently involved or may become involved in claims, pending or threatened litigation or other legal proceedings, investigations or regulatory proceedings regarding

18


employment or other regulatory, legal, or contractual matters arising in the ordinary course of business.  There is no certainty that the results of these matters will be favorable to the Company.  We accrue for known individual matters thatif we believe are likely toit is probable that the matter will result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss.    There may be additional losses that have not been accrued, or liabilities may exceed our estimates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Legal and regulatory proceedings, inquiries or investigations of our business practices by the U.S. Government are unpredictable and an adverse decision in any such matter, or an adverse decision resulting in a loss that exceeds our best estimates, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We are sometimes subject to government inquiries, audits and investigations of our business due to our business relationships with the U.S. Government and the heavily regulated industries in which we do business. Any such inquiry or investigation could potentially result in fines, criminal or civil penalties, the termination of our contracts, withholding of payments, suspension, and/or debarment from participating in future business opportunities with the U.S. Government, which could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws and regulations.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and similar anti-bribery laws and regulations in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or securing an improper business advantage.  Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws.  We operate in many parts of the world and sell to industries that have experienced corruption to some degree.  If we are found to be liable for FCPA or other similar anti-bribery law or regulatory violations, whether due to our or others’ actions or inadvertence, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

ChangesWe derive a significant portion of our revenues from non-U.S. sales and are subject to the risks inherent in doing business in other countries.

In 2013, approximately 45% of our total sales were made to customers in jurisdictions outside of the United States (including products manufactured in the legalUnited States and regulatory environmentssold outside the United States as well as products manufactured in international locations).  Accordingly, our business and results of the countries in which we operate may affect future sales and expenses.operations are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally, including:

·

fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;

·

limitations on ownership and on repatriation of earnings;

·

transportation delays and interruptions;

·

political, social and economic instability and disruptions;

·

government embargos or trade restrictions;

·

the imposition of duties and tariffs and other trade barriers;

·

import and export controls;

·

changes in labor conditions;

·

changes in regulatory environments;

·

the potential for nationalization of enterprises;

·

difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations;

·

limitations on the Company’s ability to enforce legal rights and remedies, including protection of intellectual property;

·

difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through some foreign legal systems;

·

acts of terrorism;

·

potentially adverse tax consequences; and

·

difficulties in implementing restructuring actions on a timely basis.

We operateare also subject to U.S. laws prohibiting companies from doing business in a numbercertain countries, or restricting the type of countriesbusiness that may be conducted in these countries.  The cost of compliance with increasingly complex and are affected by a variety of laws andoften conflicting regulations governing various matters worldwide, including foreign investment, employment, import, export, business acquisitions, environmental and taxation matters, land use rights, property, and other matters. Ourmatters, can also impair our flexibility in modifying product, marketing, pricing or other strategies for growing our businesses, as well as our ability to operate in these countries may be materially adversely affected by unexpected changes in such lawsimprove productivity and regulations which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

maintain acceptable operating margins.  We must also comply with restrictions on exports imposed under the U.S. Export Control Laws and Sanctions Programs.  These laws and regulations change from time to time and may restrict foreign sales.

OperationsIn 2013, approximately 9% of our total sales were to customers in the Peoples’ Republic of China and supplierswe have significant operations in the Peoples’ Republic of China.  Our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit documentation related to their audit report included in this annual report may be located in the Peoples’ Republic of China.  The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) currently cannot inspect audit documentation located in China and, as such, prevents the PCAOB from regularly evaluating audit work of any auditors that was performed in China, including that performed by our independent auditors in China.  As a result, investors may be deprived of the full benefits of PCAOB oversight of our global audits via their inspections.  The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of audit work performed in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our Chinese independent auditor’s audit procedures as compared to auditors in other jurisdictions that are subject to physical and other risks that could disrupt production.PCAOB inspections on all of their work.

Our operations include principal facilities in the United States, China, Germany, and Poland. In addition, we operate sales and service facilities in Brazil, Bulgaria, India, Japan, the Netherlands, Peru, the Republic of Korea, Russia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. We also have suppliers for materials and parts inside and outside the United States. Our operations and sources of supply could be disrupted by a natural disaster, war, political unrest, terrorist activity, public health concerns, or other unforeseen events, which could cause significant delays in the shipment of products and the provision of services and could cause the loss of sales and customers. Accordingly, disruption of our operations or the operations of a significant supplier could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We have significant investments outside the United States and significant sales

19


Sales and purchases in foreign denominated currencies creating exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

We have significant investments outsideother than the United States. Further, we have sales and purchases of raw materials and finished goods in foreign denominated currencies. Accordingly, we have exposureU.S. dollar expose us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange ratescurrencies relative to the U.S. dollar.  These exposures may change over time as our business and business practices evolve, and they could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows.  An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets outside the United States where we sell in U.S. dollars, and a weakened U.S. dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of raw materials to the extent that we must purchase components

in foreign currencies.  Foreign currency exchange rate risk is reduced through several means, including the maintenance of local production facilities in the markets served, invoicing of customers in the same currency as the source of the products, prompt settlement of inter-company balances utilizing a global netting system, and limited use of foreign currency denominated debt.   Despite these measures, continued instabilityWhile we monitor our exchange rate exposures and seek to reduce the risk of volatility, our actions may not be successful in the worldwide financial markets, sovereignsignificantly mitigating such volatility.

In addition, uncertain global economic conditions arising from circumstances such as slowing growth in emerging regions and credit rating downgrades in certain European countries or speculation regarding changes to the composition or viability of the Euro zone could result in reduced customer confidence and uncertainty surrounding European sovereigndecreased demand for our products and other debt defaults, could impactservices, disruption in payment patterns and higher default rates, a tightening of credit markets, increased risk regarding supplier performance, increased counterparty risk with respect to the financial institutions with which we do business, and exchange rate fluctuations.  While we employ comprehensive controls regarding global cash management to guard against cash or investment loss and to ensure our ability to manage effectivelyfund our foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation risk, whichoperations and commitments, a material disruption to the financial institutions with whom we transact business could have a material adverse effect on our international operations or on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our net postretirement benefit obligation liabilities may grow, and the fair value of our pension plan assets may decrease, which could require us to make additional and/or unexpected cash contributions to our pension plans, increase the amount of postretirement benefit expenses, affect our liquidity or affect our ability to comply with the terms of our outstanding debt arrangements.

Accounting for retirement, pension and postretirement benefit obligations and related expense requires the use of assumptions, including a weighted-average discount rate, an expected long-term rate of return on assets, and a net healthcare cost trend rate, among others.  Benefit obligations and benefit costs are sensitive to changes in these assumptions.  As a result, assumption changes could result in increases in our obligation amounts and expenses.  If interest rates decline, the present value of our postretirement benefit plan liabilities may increase faster than the value of plan assets, resulting in significantly higher unfunded positions in some of our pension plans.  As of September 30, 2012,2013, we had $161,503$190,175 in invested pension plan assets.  Investment losses may result in decreases to our pension plan assets.

Funding estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of assets and expected return on plan assets and are subject to changes in government regulations in the countries in which our employees work.  Volatility in the financial markets may impact future discount and interest rate assumptions.  Significant changes in investment performance or a change in the portfolio mix of invested assets can result in increases or decreases in the valuation of plan assets or in a change of the expected rate of return on plan assets.  Also, new accounting standards on fair value measurement may impact the calculation of future funding levels.  We periodically review our assumptions, and any such revision can significantly change the present value of future benefits, and in turn, the funded status of our pension plans and the resulting periodic pension expense.  Changes in our pension benefit obligations and the related net periodic costs or credits may occur as a result of variances of actual results from our assumptions, and we may be required to make additional cash contributions in the future beyond those which have been estimated.

In addition, our existing term loan facility, revolving credit facility, line of credit, and note purchase agreements contain continuing covenants and events of default regarding our pension plans, including provisions regarding the unfunded liabilities related to those pension plans.  See the discussion above concerning “Our debt obligations and the restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our debt could limit our ability to operate our business or pursue our business strategies, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.”

To the extent that the present values of benefits incurred for pension obligations are greater than values of the assets supporting those obligations or if we are required to make additional or unexpected contributions to our pension plans for any reason, our ability to comply with the terms of our outstanding debt arrangements, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Our business operations may be adversely affected by information systems interruptions or intrusion.

We are dependent on various information technologies throughout our company to administer, store and support multiple business activities.  If these systems are damaged, cease to function properly or are subject to cybersecurity attacks, such as unauthorized access, malicious software and other violations, we could experience production downtimes, operational delays, other detrimental impacts on our operations or ability to provide products and services to our customers, the compromising of

20


confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems or networks, financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business or potential liability, and/or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.  While we attempt to mitigate these risks by employing a number of measures, including technical security controls, employee training, comprehensive monitoring of our networks and systems, and maintenance of backup and protective systems, our systems, networks, products, solutions and services remain potentially vulnerable to additional known or unknown threats. 

Industry Risks

Competitors may develop breakthrough technologies that are adopted by our customers.

The markets in which we operate experience rapidly changing technologies and frequent introductions of new products and services.  The technological expertise we have developed and maintained could become less valuable if a competitor were to develop a breakthrough technology that would allow it to match or exceed the performance of existing technologies at a lower cost.  If we are unable to develop competitive technologies, future sales or earnings could be lower than expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Industry consolidation trends could reduce our sales opportunities, decrease sales prices, and drive down demand for our products.

There has been consolidation and there may be further consolidation in the aerospace, power, and process industries.  The consolidation in these industries has resulted in customers with vertically integrated operations, including increased in-sourcing capabilities, which may result in economies of scale for those companies.  If our customers continue to seek to control more aspects of vertically integrated projects, cost pressures resulting in further integration or industry consolidation could reduce our sales opportunities, decrease sales prices, and drive down demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We operate in a highly competitive industry.

We face intense competition from a number of established competitors in the United States and abroad, some of which are larger in size or are divisions of large diversified companies with substantially greater financial resources.  In addition, global competition continues to increase.  Companies compete on the basis of providing products that meet the needs of customers, as well as on the basis of price, quality, and customer service.  Changes in competitive conditions, including the availability of new products and services, the introduction of new channels of distribution, and changes in OEM and aftermarket pricing, could impact our relationships with our customers and may adversely affect future sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Unforeseen events may occur that significantly reduce commercial aviation.

A significant portion of our business is related to commercial aviation.  The recent global economic downturn and uncertainty in the marketplace led to a general reduction in demand for air transportation services, leading some airlines to withdraw aircraft from service, which negatively impacted sales of our aerospace components and services.  These economic conditions similarly impacted our sales of systems and components for new business jet aircraft.  Although the operating environment currently faced by commercial airlines has shown signs of improvement, uncertainty continues to exist.  The commercial airline industry tends to be cyclical and capital spending by airlines and aircraft manufacturers may be influenced by a variety of factors, including current and future traffic levels, aircraft fuel pricing, labor issues, competition, the retirement of older aircraft, regulatory changes, terrorism and related safety concerns, general economic conditions, worldwide airline profits and backlog levels.  In the event these or other economic indicators stagnate or worsen, market demand for our components and systems could be negatively affected by renewed reductions in demand for air transportation services or commercial airlines’ financial difficulties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The U.S. Government may change acquisition priorities and/or reduce spending.

The U.S. Government participates in a wide variety of operations, including homeland defense, counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, and other military and defense-related operations that employ our products and services.  U.S. defense spending has historically been cyclical in nature, and defense budgets tend to rise when perceived threats to national security increase the level of concern over the country’s safety.  The U.S. Government continues to adjust its funding priorities in response to changes in the perceived threat environment.  In addition, defense spending currently faces pressures due to the overall economic and political environment, budget deficits, and competing budget priorities.  A decrease in U.S. Government defense spending or changes in the spending allocation could result in one or more of our programs being reduced, delayed, or terminated.

During 2011, the U.S. Government was unable to reach agreement on the budget reduction measures required by the

21


The Budget Act passed by Congress. Unless the U.S. Government takes further action, the Budget Act will triggertriggered automatic reductions, under sequestration, in both defense and discretionary spending in January 2013.March 2013, after being postponed two months until the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 went into effect.  The resulting automatic across-the-board budget cuts in sequestration wouldwill likely have significant consequences tofor the aerospace and defense industries.  Additional guidance provided byWe believe the Officeeffects of Managementthese actions on our fiscal year 2013 results have been limited, but the impact in future years, combined with potential decreases in U.S. military deployments overseas, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and Budget and by the Department of Defense (“DOD”) indicates the DOD anticipates no contract actions will cease on or about January 2, 2013 and that any action to adjust funding levels on contracts as a result of sequestration likely would not occur for several months after January 2, 2013. cash flows.

In years when the U.S. Government does not complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year (September 30), government operations typically are funded through a continuing resolution that authorizes agencies of the U.S. Government to continue to operate, but does not authorize new spending initiatives.  When the U.S. Government operates under a continuing resolution, delays can occur in the procurement of products and services.  Historically this has not had a material effect on our business; however, should a continuing resolution be prolonged or extended through the U.S. Government’s entire fiscal year, it may cause procurement awards to be allocated into different periods, cause our revenues to vary between periods and cause an adverse effect on our backlog and revenues.  In years when the U.S. Government fails to complete its budget process or to provide for a continuing resolution, a federal government shutdown may result.  This could result in the incurrence of substantial costs without reimbursement under our contracts with the U.S. Government and delays or cancellations of key programs, which could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We continue to believe our programs are well aligned with national defense and other priorities, but shifts in domestic and international spending and tax policy, changes in security, defense, and intelligence priorities, the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, general and political economic conditions and developments, and other factors may affect a decision to fund, or the level of funding for, existing or proposed programs.  If the priorities of the U.S. Government change and/or defense spending is reduced, this may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Increasing emission standards that drive certain product sales may be eased or delayed.

We sell components and systems that have been designed to meet strict emission standards, including standards that have not yet been implemented but are intendedexpected to be implemented soon.  If these emission standards are eased, developed products may become unnecessary and/or our future sales could be lower as potential customers select alternative products or delay adoption of our products, which would have a material adverse affecteffect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Natural gas prices may increase significantly and disproportionately to other sources of fuels used for power generation.

Commercial producers of electricity use many of our components and systems, most predominately in their power plants that use natural gas as their fuel source.  Commercial producers of electricity are often in a position to manage the use of different power plant facilities and make decisions based on operating costs.  Compared to other sources of fuels used for power generation, natural gas prices have increased slower than fuel oil, but about the same as coal.  This increase in natural gas prices and any future increases could decrease the use of our components and systems, which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Changes in government subsidy programs and regulatory requirements may result in decreased demand for our products.

The U.S. Government, as well as various foreign governments, provide for various stimulus programs or subsidies, such as grants, loan guarantees and tax incentives, relating to renewable energy, alternative energy, energy efficiency and electric power infrastructure. Some of these programs have expired, which may affect the economic feasibility or timing of future projects. Additionally, while a significant amount of stimulus funds and subsidies are available to support various projects, we cannot predict the timing and scope of any investments to be made by our customers under stimulus funding and subsidies or whether stimulus funding and subsidies will result in increased demand for our products. Investments for renewable energy, alternative energy and electric power infrastructure under stimulus programs and subsidies may not occur, may be less than anticipated or may be delayed, any of which would negatively impact demand for our products.

Other current and potential regulatory initiatives may not result in increased demand for our products.  It is not certain whether existing regulatory requirements will create sufficient incentives for new projects, when or if proposed regulatory requirements will be enacted, or whether any potentially beneficial provisions will be included in the regulatory requirement.

Uncertainty with respect to government subsidy programs and regulatory requirements could cause decreased demand for our products as investments are delayed or become economically unfeasible, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. 

22


Investment Risks

The historic market price of our common stock may not be indicative of future market prices.

The market price of our common stock changes over time.  Stock markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume volatility particularly over the past few years.  The trading price of our common stock ranged from a high of $46.00$42.89 per share to a low of $25.39$31.41 per share during the twelve months ended September 30, 2012.2013.  The following factors, among others, could cause the price of our common stock in the public market to fluctuate significantly:

·

general economic conditions, particularly in the aerospace, power generation and process and transportation industries;

·

variations in our quarterly results of operation;

·

a change in sentiment in the market regarding our operations or business prospects;

·

the addition or departure of key personnel; and

·

announcements by us or our competitors of new business, acquisitions or joint ventures.

Fluctuations in our stock price often occur without regard to specific operating performance.  The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon the above factors or other factors, including those that have little to do with our company, and these fluctuations could be material.

The typical trading volume of our common stock may affect an investor’s ability to sell significant stock holdings in the future without negatively affecting stock price.

As of September 30, 2012,2013, we had 72,960 shares of common stock issued, of which 4,5364,883 shares were held as treasury shares.  In addition, 4,5564,423 shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding stock option awards.  While the level of trading activity will vary each day, the typical trading level represents only a small percentage of total shares of stock outstanding.  As a result, a stockholder who sells a significant number of shares of stock in a short period of time could negatively affect our share price.

Certain anti-takeover provisions of our charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage or prevent others from acquiring our company.

While the Company believes that these provisions are in the best interest of its stockholders, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws do contain provisions that:

·

provide for a classified board;

·

provide that directors may be removed only for cause by holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock;

·

authorize our board of directors to fill vacant directorships or to increase or decrease the size of our board of directors;

·

permit us to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 10,000 shares of preferred stock, in one or more series and, with respect to each series, to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of the series;

·

require special meetings of stockholders to be called by holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock;

·

prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent;

·

require advance notice for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to the board of directors to be acted upon at meetings of stockholders; and

·

require the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our common stock for amendments to our certificate of incorporation and certain business combinations, including mergers, consolidations, sales of all or substantially all of our assets or dissolution.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law limits business combinations with owners of more than 15% of our stock that have not been approved by the board of directors.  These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation.  Our board of directors could choose not to negotiate a potential acquisition that it diddoes not believe to be in our strategicbest interest.  Accordingly, the potential acquirer could be discouraged from offering to acquire us, or could be prevented by the anti-takeover measures, from successfully completing a hostile acquisition by the anti-takeover measures.acquisition.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.Properties

23


Item 2.Properties

Our principal plants are as follows:

United States

Duarte, California – Aerospace segment manufacturing and engineering

Fort Collins, Colorado – Corporate headquarters and Energy segment manufacturing and engineering

Greenville, South Carolina (leased) – Energy segment manufacturing and Aerospace and Energy segments engineering

Loveland, Colorado – Energy segment manufacturing and engineering

Pacoima, California (leased) – Aerospace segment manufacturing and engineering

Rockford, Illinois – Aerospace segment manufacturing and engineering

Santa Clarita, California – Aerospace segment manufacturing and engineering

Skokie, Illinois (leased) – Aerospace segment manufacturing and Aerospace and Energy segments engineering

Zeeland, Michigan – Aerospace segment manufacturing and engineering

Other Countries

Aken, Germany (leased) – Energy segment manufacturing and engineering

Kempen, Germany – Energy segment manufacturing and engineering

Krakow, Poland – Energy segment manufacturing and Aerospace and Energy segments engineering

Stuttgart, Germany (leased) – Energy segment engineering

Tianjin, Peoples’ Republic of China (leased) – Energy segment assembly

Sofia, Bulgaria – Energy segment manufacturing and engineering

In addition to the principal plants listed above, we own or lease other facilities used primarily for sales and service activities in Brazil, China, India, Japan, the Netherlands, Peru, the Republic of Korea, Russia, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

In September 2013, Woodward purchased a building site in Niles, Illinois.  Woodward intends to build a new facility on this site for its Aerospace business and will relocate some of its operations currently residing in Skokie, Illinois to this new facility. 

Our principal plants are suitable and adequate for the manufacturing and other activities performed at those plants, and we believe our utilization levels are generally high.

During fiscal year 2010, Woodward began construction of a new forty-eight thousand square foot system test facility in Rockford, Illinois. Woodward placed into service the majority of the assets associated with the new system test facility in fiscal year 2012. The facility, which houses numerous environmental system test cells and a vibration lab, will support, among other development projects, aerospace development efforts of next generation fuel systems for aircraft turbines.

In addition, we intend to establishWe are currently developing a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area for our aerospace business,Aerospace business.  This campus is intended to addresssupport the growth expected over the next ten years and beyond stimulated by our being awarded a substantial number of new system platforms.platforms, particularly on narrow-body aircraft.  We anticipate investing approximately $200,000$275,000 over the next tenfive years in land, buildings and equipment between our two Rockford area campusescampuses.  These investments are expected to result in Illinoisfuture productivity gains for our existing and approximately doublingnew business.  However, given the significance of the anticipated volumes associated with the new system platforms, we still expect our Rockford area workforce in that locationto increase substantially, by as much as 70%-90% from current levels, by the end of 2021.

We are also considering similar undertakingsdeveloping a new campus at our corporate headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado to support the continued growth with regard toof our energy business by supplementing our existing Colorado manufacturing facilities and corporate headquarters.

 We anticipate investing approximately $150,000 over the next five years in land, buildings and equipment for this new campus in Colorado. 

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

Woodward is currently involved in claims, pending or threatened litigation or other legal proceedings, investigations or regulatory proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including, among others, those relating to product liability claims, employment matters, worker’s compensation claims, regulatory, legal or contractual disputes, product warranty claims and alleged violations of various environmental laws and regulations.  We have accruedaccrue for known individual matters thatif we believe are likely toit is probable that the matter will result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss.

24


While the outcome of pending claims, legal proceedings, investigations and regulatory proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that any liabilities that may result from these claims, proceedings and investigations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market and is traded under the symbol “WWD.”  At November 9, 2012,8, 2013, there were approximately 1,2001,100 holders of record.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock and dividends paid for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 

Fiscal Year Ended September 30,

  2012   2011 

2013

 

2012

          Cash           Cash 

High

 

Low

 

Cash Dividends

 

High

 

Low

 

Cash Dividends

  High   Low   Dividends   High   Low   Dividends 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

  $42.34    $25.39    $0.07    $39.52    $30.01    $0.06  

$

38.19 

 

$

31.41 

 

$

0.08 

 

$

42.34 

 

$

25.39 

 

$

0.07 

Second quarter

  $46.00    $40.94    $0.08     39.31     30.46     0.07  

$

40.91 

 

$

36.59 

 

$

0.08 

 

$

46.00 

 

$

40.94 

 

$

0.08 

Third quarter

  $43.34    $35.32    $0.08     37.57     30.93     0.07  

$

41.37 

 

$

33.49 

 

$

0.08 

 

$

43.34 

 

$

35.32 

 

$

0.08 

Fourth quarter

  $40.83    $30.16    $0.08     37.20     24.39     0.07  

$

42.89 

 

$

38.00 

 

$

0.08 

 

$

40.83 

 

$

30.16 

 

$

0.08 

The information required by this item relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity plans is included under the caption “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement for the 20122013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held January 23, 201322, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.

25


Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative 10-year total return to stockholders on our common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P Midcap 400 index and the S&P Industrial Machinery index.  The graph shows total stockholder return assuming an investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) was made on September 30, 20022003 in our common stock and in each of the two indexes and tracks relative performance through September 30, 2012.2013.  We have used a period of 10 years as we believe that our stock performance should be reviewed over a period that is more reflective of our long-term business cycle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/03

 

9/04

 

9/05

 

9/06

 

9/07

 

9/08

 

9/09

 

9/10

 

9/11

 

9/12

 

9/13

Woodward, Inc.

$

100.00 

$

158.25 

$

202.24 

$

241.92 

$

454.23 

$

516.36 

$

359.23 

$

484.32 

$

412.67 

$

515.76 

$

628.41 

S&P Midcap 400

 

100.00 

 

117.55 

 

143.60 

 

153.02 

 

181.73 

 

151.42 

 

146.70 

 

172.79 

 

170.58 

 

219.26 

 

279.95 

S&P Industrial Machinery

 

100.00 

 

134.28 

 

140.78 

 

156.78 

 

208.36 

 

153.78 

 

151.47 

 

193.86 

 

170.23 

 

248.44 

 

341.27 

 

   Woodward,
Inc.
   S&P Midcap
400
   S&P Industrial
Machinery
 

9/02

   100.00     100.00     100.00  

9/03

   93.79     126.81     126.29  

9/04

   148.42     149.07     169.58  

9/05

   189.67     182.10     177.79  

9/06

   226.88     194.05     198.00  

9/07

   426.00     230.45     263.14  

9/08

   484.27     192.01     194.21  

9/09

   336.90     186.04     191.29  

9/10

   454.22     219.11     244.82  

9/11

   387.03     216.31     214.99  

9/12

   483.71     278.05     313.76  

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(In thousands, except for shares and per share

amounts)26

 

   Total Number of
Shares Purchased
   Weighted Average
Price Paid Per Share
   Total Number of
Shares  Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans

or Programs (1)
   Maximum Number
(or  Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that may yet
be Purchased  under
the Plans or
Programs at Period
End (1)
 

July 1, 2012 through July 31, 2012

   —      $—       -    $158,281  

August 1, 2012 through August 31, 2012

   280,000     36.12     280,000     148,169  

September 1, 2012 through September 30, 2012 (2)

   60,647     35.27     60,000     146,052  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(In thousands, except for shares and per share amounts.)

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

Weighted Average Price Paid Per Share

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)

 

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs at Period End (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013

 

 -

 

$

 -

 

 -

 

$

200,000 

 

August 1, 2013 through August 31, 2013

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

200,000 

 

September 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 (2)

 

452 

 

 

40.83 

 

 -

 

 

200,000 

(1)

In July 2010,2013, our Board of Directors authorized a stocknew program for the repurchase program of up to $200,000 of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will endexpire in July 2016.  This new program replaced a prior similar program that expired in July 2013.  We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the new repurchase program during the quarter ended September 30, 2013.

(2)

The

Under a trust established for the purposes of administering the Woodward Executive Benefit Plan, which is a separate legal entity, aquired 647452 shares of common stock were acquired on the open market related to the reinvestment of dividends for shares of treasury stock held for deferred compensation in September 2012.2013.  Shares owned by the Woodward Executive Benefit Plantrust, which is a separate legal entity, are inlcudedincluded in "Treasury stock held for deferred compensation" in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes which appear in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

  

(In thousands except per share amounts)

 

(In thousands except per share amounts)

Net sales (1)

  $1,865,627    $1,711,702    $1,457,030    $1,430,125    $1,258,204  

$

1,935,976 

 

$

1,865,627 

 

$

1,711,702 

 

$

1,457,030 

 

$

1,430,125 

Net Earnings:

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to Woodward (1)(2)(3)(4)

   141,589     132,235     110,844     94,352     121,880  

 

145,942 

 

141,589 

 

132,235 

 

110,844 

 

94,352 

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   —       —       318     64     675  

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

318 

 

64 

Earnings per share attributable to Woodward:

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward

   2.06     1.92     1.62     1.39     1.80  

 

2.13 

 

2.06 

 

1.92 

 

1.62 

 

1.39 

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward

   2.01     1.89     1.59     1.37     1.75  

 

2.10 

 

2.01 

 

1.89 

 

1.59 

 

1.37 

Cash dividends per share

   0.31     0.27     0.24     0.24     0.24  

 

0.32 

 

0.31 

 

0.27 

 

0.24 

 

0.24 

Income taxes (3)

   56,218     55,332     43,713     28,060     60,030  

 

53,629 

 

56,218 

 

55,332 

 

43,713 

 

28,060 

Interest expense

   26,003     25,399     29,385     33,629     3,834  

 

26,703 

 

26,003 

 

25,399 

 

29,385 

 

33,629 

Interest income

   542     534     509     1,131     2,120  

 

273 

 

542 

 

534 

 

509 

 

1,131 

Depreciation expense

   35,808     40,400     40,502     37,828     28,620  

 

37,254 

 

35,808 

 

40,400 

 

40,502 

 

37,828 

Amortization expense

   32,809     34,993     35,114     26,120     6,830  

 

36,979 

 

32,809 

 

34,993 

 

35,114 

 

26,120 

Capital expenditures

   64,900     48,255     28,104     28,947     37,516  

 

141,600 

 

64,900 

 

48,255 

 

28,104 

 

28,947 

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic shares outstanding

   68,880     68,797     68,472     67,891     67,564  

 

68,392 

 

68,880 

 

68,797 

 

68,472 

 

67,891 

Diluted shares outstanding

   70,307     70,140     69,864     69,103     69,560  

 

69,602 

 

70,307 

 

70,140 

 

69,864 

 

69,103 
  At September 30, 
  2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 
      (Dollars in thousands)         

Working capital

  $623,609    $536,936    $456,577    $434,166    $369,211  

Total assets

   1,859,964     1,781,434     1,663,233     1,696,422     927,017  

Long-term debt, less current portion

   384,375     406,875     425,250     526,771     33,337  

Total debt

   392,204     425,249     465,842     572,340     48,928  

Total liabilities

   851,849     862,337     860,039     984,907     294,601  

Stockholders’ equity

   1,008,115     919,097     803,194     711,515     632,416  

Full-time worker members

   6,650     6,199     5,433     5,721     4,476  

Notes:

27

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Working capital

$

544,017 

 

$

623,609 

 

$

536,936 

 

$

456,577 

 

$

434,166 

Total assets

 

2,205,684 

 

 

1,859,964 

 

 

1,781,434 

 

 

1,663,233 

 

 

1,696,422 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

450,000 

 

 

384,375 

 

 

406,875 

 

 

425,250 

 

 

526,771 

Total debt

 

550,000 

 

 

392,204 

 

 

425,249 

 

 

465,842 

 

 

572,340 

Total liabilities

 

1,063,139 

 

 

851,849 

 

 

862,337 

 

 

860,039 

 

 

984,907 

Stockholders’ equity

 

1,142,545 

 

 

1,008,115 

 

 

919,097 

 

 

803,194 

 

 

711,515 

Full-time worker members

 

6,736 

 

 

6,650 

 

 

6,199 

 

 

5,433 

 

 

5,721 

Notes:

1.

On December 28, 2012, Woodward acquired from GE Aviation Systems LLC (the “Seller”) substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of the Seller's thrust reverser actuation systems business located in Duarte, California (the “Duarte Business”).  On April 14, 2011, Woodward acquired Integral Drive Systems AG and its European companies, including their respective holding companies (“IDS”), and the assets of IDS’ business in China (together, the “IDS Acquisition”). On October 3, 2008, Woodward acquired MPC Products and Techni-Core.  On April 3, 2009, Woodward acquired HR Textron Inc. from Textron Inc., its parent company, and the United Kingdom assets and certain liabilities related to HR Textron Inc.’s business (collectively “HRT”), including its Fuel & Pneumatics (“F&P”) product line.  TheWoodward sold the F&P product line was sold on August 10, 2009. On October 3, 2008, Woodward acquired MPC Products Corp. and Techni-Core, Inc. 

2.

In the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, Woodward recorded a specific charge of $15,707 related to the alignment of its renewable power business to the economic environment and then foreseeable future.  In March 2009, Woodward recorded restructuring and other charges totaling $15,159 before taxes related to restructuring our businesses to adjust to the then current economic environment.

3.

In fiscal year 2013, Woodward recognized a tax benefit of $4,911, or $0.07 per basic and diluted share, related to the retroactive impact from fiscal year 2012 of the reinstatement of the U.S. research and experimentation credit.   In fiscal year 2011, Woodward recognized a tax benefit of $3,088, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share, related to the retroactive impact from fiscal year 2010 of the reinstatement of the U.S. research and experimentation credit.   In the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, Woodward recognized $6,416, or $0.09 per basic and diluted share, of benefit related to favorable resolutions of prior year tax matters and the completion of certain internal revaluation assessments in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010.assessments.  In the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, Woodward recognized $4,992, or $0.07 per basic and diluted share, of benefit related to favorable resolutions of prior year tax matters. These special benefits increased net earnings by $0.09 per basic and diluted shares and $0.07 per basic and diluted shares in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.

4.

Woodward recognized $12,500 of pre-tax charges through cost of goods sold during the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 related to the purchase accounting basis step-up of inventory acquired as part of the HRT acquisition.  This was a non-cash charge which decreased earnings, net of tax, by $8,000 or $0.12 per basic and diluted share.

Item 7.Management’sItem 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OVERVIEW

OVERVIEW

Woodward enhances the global quality of life and sustainability by optimizing energy use through improved efficiency and lower emissions.  We are an independent designer, manufacturer, and service provider of energy control and optimization solutions.  We design, produce and service reliable, efficient, low-emission, and high-performance energy control products

28


for diverse applications in challenging environments.  We have significant production and assembly facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia, and promote our products and services through our worldwide locations.

Our strategic focus is providing control solutions for the aerospace and energy markets.  The precise and efficient control of energy, including fluid and electrical energy, combustion, and motion, is a growing requirement in the markets we serve.    Our customers look to us to optimize the efficiency, emissions and operation of power equipment in both commercial and militarydefense operations.  Our core technologies leverage well across our markets and customer applications, enabling us to develop and integrate cost-effective and state-of-the-art fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation and electronic systems.  We focus primarily on serving OEMs and equipment packagers, partnering with them to bring superior component and system solutions to their demanding applications.  We also provide aftermarket repair, replacement and other service support for our installed products.

Our components and integrated systems optimize performance of commercial aircraft, militarydefense aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment, gas and steam turbines, wind turbines, including converters and power grid related equipment, industrial diesel, gas, alternative and alternativedual fuel reciprocating engines, and electrical power systems.  Our innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help our customers offer more cost-effective, cleaner, and more reliable equipment. Our customers include leading OEMs and the end users of their products.

Management’s discussion and analysis should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in this report.  Dollar and number of share amounts contained in this discussion and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are in thousands, except per share amounts.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes.  Note1,Operations and summary of significant accounting policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.  The estimates and assumptions described below are those that we consider to be most critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they involve significant judgments and uncertainties.  All of these estimates reflect our best judgment about current, and for some estimates, future economic and market conditions and their effects based on information available as of the date of these financial statements.  As estimates are updated or actual amounts are known, our critical accounting estimates are revised, and operating results may be affected by the revised estimates.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosures in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Revenue recognition

Woodward recognizes revenue when the following criteria are met:

1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,

2) delivery of the product has occurred or services have been rendered,

3) price is fixed or determinable, and

4) collectability is reasonably assured.

In implementing the four criteria stated above, we have found that determining when the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, which determines whether persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and if delivery has occurred, may require judgment.  The passage of title indicates transfer of the risks and rewards of ownership from Woodward to the customer; however, contract- and customer-specific circumstances are reviewed by management to ensure that transfer of title constitutes the transfer of the risks and rewards of ownership.

Examples of situations requiring management review and judgment, with respect to the passage of the risks and rewards of ownership, include: interpretation of customer-specific contract terms, situations where substantive performance obligations exist, such as completion of product testing that remain after product delivery to the customer, situations that require customer acceptance (or in some instances regulatory acceptance) of the product, and situations in countries whose laws provide for retention of some form of title by sellers such that Woodward is able to recover goods in the event a customer defaults on payment.

29


Based on management’s determination, if the risks and rewards of ownership have not passed to the customer, revenue is deferred until this requirement is met.

Purchase accounting

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, we completed the Duarte Acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000.  The acquisition was completed on December 28, 2012, and, based on preliminary purchase adjustments, we paid cash at closing in the amount of $198,900.  The purchase price remains subject to certain additional customary post-closing adjustments.  During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, we completed the IDS Acquisition for an aggregate purchase priceand paid cash at closing of $47,161.$48,412.  For more information on the Duarte Acquisition and the IDS Acquisition see Note 4,Business acquisitions, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Assigning fair market values to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of an acquisition requires knowledge of current market values, and the values of assets in use, and often requires the application of judgment regarding estimates and assumptions.  While the ultimate responsibility resides with management, for material acquisitions, we retain the services of certified valuation specialists to assist with assigning estimated values to certain acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including intangible assets and postretirement benefit plan assets and liabilities.

Acquired intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology based on future cash flows specific to the type of intangible asset purchased.  This methodology incorporates various estimates and assumptions, the most significant being projected revenue growth rates, earnings margins, and forecasted cash flows based on the discount rate and terminal growth rate.  Management projects revenue growth rates, earnings margins and cash flows based on the historical operating results of the acquired entity adjusted for synergies anticipated to be achieved through integration, expected future performance, operational strategies, and the general macroeconomic environment.  We review finite-lived intangible assets for triggering events such as significant changes in operations, customers or future revenue that might indicate the need to impair the assets acquired or change the useful lives of the assets acquired.  There was no impairment or change in useful lives recognized on other intangible assets acquired in fiscal years 2013, 2012 2011 or 2010.2011.  

Estimated values for acquired property, plant and equipment are based on current market values and replacement costs of similar assets.  Estimated values for inventory acquired is subject to reliable estimates, as of the acquisition date, of future sales volumes, replacement costs, costs of selling effort, anticipated selling prices, normal profit margins, the percent complete, and costs to complete work-in-process inventory.  Estimated values for accounts receivable are subject to reliable estimates of collectability.

Assumed liabilities are valued based on estimates of anticipated expenditures to be incurred to satisfy the assumed obligations, including estimation of any warranty or other contractual liabilities assumed, which require the exercise of professional judgment.  Valuation of postretirement benefit plan assets and liabilities is dependent on similar assumptions and estimates as those used to value our non-acquisition postretirement benefit plan assets and liabilities.

Assumed contracts may have favorable or unfavorable terms that must be valued as of the acquisition date.  Such valuation is subject to management judgment regarding the evaluation and interpretation of contract terms in relation to other economic circumstances, such as the market rates for office space leases.

If we assume a performance obligation to customers as of the acquisition date, a deferred revenue obligation is recognized.  Judgment is required to evaluate whether a future performance obligation exists and to assign a value to the performance obligation.

Valuation of gain and loss contingencies, if not resolved during the purchase measurement period, requires exercise of management judgment.  We measure pre-acquisition contingencies at their acquisition date fair value if their fair value can be determined during the measurement period.  If we cannot determine the fair value of the pre-acquisition contingency during the measurement period, we recognize an acquired asset or assumed liability if it is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated.

Assumed acquired tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions are dependent on assessing the past practices of the acquisition target based on review of actual tax filings and information obtained through due diligence procedures.  Evaluation of the validity of tax positions taken by the acquisition target are subject to management judgment.

Inventory

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value.  Inventory cost is determined using methods that approximate the first-in, first-out basis.  We include product costs, labor and related fixed and variable overhead in the cost of inventories.

Inventory market values are determined by giving substantial consideration to the expected product selling price.  We estimate expected selling prices based on our historical recovery rates, general economic and market conditions, the expected

30


channel of disposition, and current customer contracts and preferences.  Actual results may differ from our estimates due to changes in resale or market value and the mix of these factors.  Management monitors inventory for events or circumstances, such as negative margins, recent sales history suggesting lower sales value, or changes in customer preferences, which would indicate the market value of inventory is less than the carrying value of inventory, and management records adjustments as necessary.  When inventory is written down below cost, such reduced amount is considered the cost for subsequent accounting purposes.  Our recording of inventory at the lower of cost or market value has not historically required material adjustments once initially established.

The carrying value of inventory was $398,229$431,744 and $381,555$398,229 at September 30, 20122013 and September 30, 2011,2012, respectively.  If economic conditions, customer product requirements, or other factors significantly reduce future customer demand for our products from forecast levels, then future adjustments to the carrying value of inventory may become necessary.  We attempt to maintain inventory quantities at levels considered necessary to fill expected orders in a reasonable time frame, which we believe mitigates our exposure to future inventory carrying cost adjustments.

Postretirement benefits

The Company provides various benefits to certain employees through defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans.  A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all Woodward defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.  For financial reporting purposes, net periodic benefits expense and related obligations are calculated using a number of significant actuarial assumptions, including anticipated discount rates, rates of compensation increases, long-term return on defined benefit plan investments, and anticipated healthcare cost increases.  Based on these actuarial assumptions, at September 30, 2012,2013, our recorded liabilities included $36,973$248 for underfunded defined benefit pension plans and $37,550$28,996 for unfunded other postretirement benefit plans.  Changes in net periodic expense or the amounts of recorded liabilities may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions.

Estimates of the value of postretirement benefit obligations, and related net periodic benefits expense, are dependent on actuarial assumptions, including future interest rates, compensation rates, healthcare cost trends, and returns on defined benefit plan investments.

It should be noted that economic factors and conditions often affect multiple assumptions simultaneously, and the effects of changes in assumptions are not necessarily linear due to factors such as the 10% corridor applied to the larger of the postretirement benefit obligation or the fair market value of plan assets used to determine the amortization of actuarial net gains or losses. 

Primary actuarial assumptions for our defined benefit pension plans were determined as follows:

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments. In the United States, we used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding. In fiscal year 2012, we refined our existing estimation process for determining the discount rates in the United Kingdom and Japan and used cash flow matching to develop a single rate equivalent for a theoretical portfolio of non-callable, AA-rated bonds for each jurisdiction. In fiscal years 2011 and 2010, we used the iBoxx AA-rated corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark in the United Kingdom, and we used Standard & Poors AA-rated corporate bond yields (applicable for bonds over 10 years) as the benchmark in Japan. In Switzerland, we used high quality swap rates plus a credit spread of 0.46% and 0.36%, in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively, as high quality swaps are available in Switzerland at various durations and trade at higher volumes than bonds. Our assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks. These rates are sensitive to changes in interest rates. A decrease in the discount rate would increase our obligation and future expense.

·

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments.  In the United States, we used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding.  Beginning in fiscal year 2012, we refined our existing estimation process for determining the discount rates in the United Kingdom and Japan and used cash flow matching to develop a single rate equivalent for a theoretical portfolio of non-callable, AA-rated bonds for each jurisdiction.  In fiscal year 2011, we used the iBoxx AA-rated corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark in the United Kingdom, and we used Standard & Poors AA-rated corporate bond yields (applicable for bonds over 10 years) as the benchmark in Japan.  In Switzerland, we used high quality swap rates plus a credit spread of 0.20%, 0.46% and 0.36%, in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as high quality swaps are available in Switzerland at various durations and trade at higher volumes than bonds.  Our assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks.  These rates are sensitive to changes in interest rates.

·

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change In Discount Rate

 

 

1% increase

 

1% decrease

Defined benefit pension benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 

$

(1,136)

 

$

1,933 

2014 Projected Service and Interest Costs

 

 

(260)

 

 

138 

Accumulated Post Retirement Benefit Obligation as of Sept. 30, 2013

 

 

(25,230)

 

 

30,991 

31


·

Compensation increase assumptions are based upon historical experience and anticipated future management actions.  An increase in the rate would increase our obligation and expense.

·

In determining the long-term rate of return on plan assets, we assume that the historical long-term compound growth rates of equity and fixed-income securities will predict the future returns of similar investments in the plan portfolio.  Investment management and other fees paid out of the plan assets are factored into the determination of asset return assumptions.  This rate is impacted by changes in general market conditions, but because it represents a long-term rate, it is not significantly impacted by short-term market volatility.  Changes in our allocation of plan assets would also impact this rate.  For example, a shift to more fixed-income securities would lower the rate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change In Rate of Return on Plan Assets

 

 

0.5% increase

 

0.5% decrease

Defined benefit pension benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 

$

(944)

 

$

944 

In determining the long-term rate of return on plan assets, we assume that the historical long-term compound growth rates of equity and fixed-income securities will predict the future returns of similar investments in the plan portfolio. Investment management and other fees paid out of the plan assets are factored into the determination of asset return assumptions. This rate is impacted by changes in general market conditions, but because it represents a long-term rate, it is not significantly impacted by short-term market volatility. Changes in our allocation of plan assets would also impact this rate. For example, a shift to more fixed-income securities would lower the rate. A decrease in the rate would increase our obligation and expense.

Primary actuarial assumptions for our other postretirement benefit plans were determined as follows:

·

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the postretirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments.  In the United States, we used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding.  Beginning in fiscal year 2012, we refined our existing estimation process for determining the discount rates in the United Kingdom and used cash flow matching to develop a single rate equivalent for a theoretical portfolio of non-callable, AA-rated bonds.  In fiscal year 2011, we used the iBoxx AA-rated corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark in the United Kingdom.  Our assumed rate did not differ significantly from this benchmark.  These rates are sensitive to changes in interest rates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change In Discount Rate

 

 

1% increase

 

1% decrease

Other postretirement benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 

$

(83)

 

$

96 

2014 Projected Service and Interest Costs

 

 

134 

 

 

(164)

Accumulated Post Retirement Benefit Obligation as of Sept. 30, 2013

 

 

(2,266)

 

 

2,625 

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the postretirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments. In the United States, we used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding. In fiscal year 2012, we refined our existing estimation process for determining the discount rates in the United Kingdom and used cash flow matching to develop a single rate equivalent for a theoretical portfolio of non-callable, AA-rated bonds. In fiscal years 2011 and 2010, we used the iBoxx AA-rated corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark in the United Kingdom. Our assumed rate did not differ significantly from this benchmark. These rates are sensitive to changes in interest rates. A decrease in the discount rate would increase our obligation and future expense.

·

The assumed health care trend rate represents the rate at which health care costs are assumed to increase and is based on historical and expected experience.  Changes in our projections of future health care costs due to general economic conditions and those specific to health care (e.g., technology driven cost changes) will impact this trend rate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1% increase

 

1% decrease

Effect on projected fiscal year 2014 service and interest cost

 

$

141 

 

$

(124)

Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at September 30, 2013

 

 

2,620 

 

 

(2,303)

The assumed health care trend rate represents the rate at which health care costs are assumed to increase and is based on historical and expected experience. Changes in our projections of future health care costs due to general economic conditions and those specific to health care (e.g., technology driven cost changes) will impact this trend rate. An increase in the trend rate would increase our obligation and expense.

Variances from our fiscal year end estimates for these variables could materially affect our recognized postretirement benefit obligation liabilities.  On a near-term basis, such changes are unlikely to have a material impact on reported earnings, since such adjustments are recorded to other comprehensive earnings and recognized into expense over a number of years.  Significant changes in estimates could, however, materially affect the carrying amounts of benefit obligation liabilities,

32


including accumulated benefit obligations, which could affect compliance with the provisions of our debt arrangements and future borrowing capacity.

The following information illustrates the sensitivity of the net periodic benefit cost and the projected accumulated benefit obligation to a change in the discount rate assumed.

     Increase/(Decrease) In 
        2013  Post Retirement 
     2013 Net  Projected  Benefit 
     Periodic  Service and  Obligation as of 

Assumption

  Change Benefit Cost  Interest Costs  Sept. 30, 2012 

Defined benefit pension benefits:

     

Change in discount rate

  1% increase $(1,795 $(333 $(27,147
  1% decrease  2,876    246    33,569  

Other postretirement benefits:

     

Change in discount rate

  1% increase  154    193    (3,169
  1% decrease  (163  (238  3,712  

It should be noted that economic factors and conditions often affect multiple assumptions simultaneously, and the effects of changes in assumptions are not necessarily linear due to factors such as the 10% corridor applied to the larger of the postretirement benefit obligation or the fair market value of plan assets when determining amortization of actuarial net gains or losses.

A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

   1% increase   1% decrease 

Effect on projected fiscal year 2013 service and interest cost

  $165      $(143

Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at September 30, 2012

   3,759       (3,270

Reviews for impairment of goodwill

At September 30, 2013, we had $551,624 of goodwill, representing 25% of our total assets.  At September 30, 2012, we had $461,374 of goodwill, representing 25% of our total assets.  At September 30, 2011, we had $462,282 of goodwill, representing 26% of our total assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment onat the reporting unit or aggregated reporting unit level if aggregation is appropriate based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, on an annual basis and more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or aggregated reporting unit below its carrying amount.  Based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, we sometimes aggregate components of a single operating segment into a reporting unit, if appropriate.   For purposes of performing the impairment tests, we identify reporting units in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  The identification of reporting units and consideration of aggregation criteria requires management judgment.  The impairment tests consist of comparing the fair value of individual or aggregated reporting units, determined using discounted cash flows, with their carrying amount including goodwill.  If the carrying amount of the individual or aggregated reporting unitsunit exceeds its fair value, we compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount.  If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its implied fair value.  There was no impairment charge recorded in fiscal years 2013, 2012, 2011, or 2010.2011.

Woodward completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of July 31, 20122013 during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.2013.  At that date, Woodward determined it was appropriate to aggregate certain components of the same operating segment into a single aggregated reporting units.unit.  The fair value of each of Woodward’s aggregated reporting units was determined using an income approach based on a discounted cash flow method.  This method represents a Level 3 input and incorporates various estimates and assumptions, the most significant being projected revenue growth rates, earnings margins, and the present value, based on the discount rate and terminal growth rate, of forecasted cash flows.  Management projects revenue growth rates, earnings margins and cash flows based on each aggregated reporting unit’s current operational results, expected performance and operational strategies over a five or ten-year period.  These projections are adjusted to reflect current economic conditions and demand for certain products, and require considerable management judgment.

Forecasted cash flows used in the July 31, 20122013 impairment test were discounted using weighted-average cost of capital assumptions ranging from 8.88%8.85% to 9.60%10.32%.  The terminal values of the forecasted cash flows were calculated using the Gordon Growth Model and assumed an annual compound growth rate after five or ten years of 4.05%4.25% or 4.50%.  These inputs, which are unobservable in the market, represent management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in determining the present value of the Company’s forecasted cash flows.  Changes in these estimates and assumptions can have a significant impact on the fair value of forecasted cash flows.  Woodward evaluated the reasonableness of the aggregated reporting units resulting fair values utilizing a market multiple method.

The results of Woodward’s annual goodwill impairment test performed as of July 31, 2012,2013, indicated the estimated fair value of each aggregated reporting unit was significantly in excess of its carrying value, and accordingly, no impairment existed.  Increasing the discount rate by 20%, decreasing the growth rate by 20%, or decreasing forecasted cash flow by 20%, would also not have resulted in an impairment charge at July 31, 2012.2013.

As part of the Company’s ongoing monitoring efforts, Woodward will continue to consider the global economic environment and its potential impact on Woodward’s business in assessing goodwill for possible indications of impairment.  There can be no assurance that Woodward’s estimates and assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows of certain aggregated reporting units, the current economic environment, the level of U.S. defense spending, including the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, or the other inputs used in forecasting the present value of forecasted cash flows will prove to be accurate projections of future performance.

Income taxes

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions.  Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes.

During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.  We establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due.  The reserves are established when we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and may not be fully sustained on review by tax authorities.  We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or refinement of an estimate.  Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will be consistent with what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals.  To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the current provision for income taxes.  The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve positions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate.  As of September 30, 2012 2013

33


and September 30, 2011,2012, unrecognized gross tax benefits for which recognition has been deferred were $18,069$22,694 and $16,931,$18,069, respectively.

Significant judgment is also required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets.  The determination of the amount of valuation allowance to be provided on recorded deferred tax assets involves estimates regarding the timing and amount of the reversal of taxable temporary differences, expected future taxable income, and the impact of tax planning strategies.  A valuation allowance is established to offset any deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies.  Changes in the relevant facts can significantly impact the judgment or need for valuation allowances.   In the event we change our determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.  As of September 30, 20122013 and September 30, 2011,2012, our valuation allowance was $2,752$11,783 and $3,201,$2,752, respectively.

Our effective tax rates differ from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the tax impact of foreign operations, adjustments of valuation allowances, research tax credits, state taxes, and tax audit settlements.  In addition to potential local country tax law and policy changes that could impact the provision for income taxes, management’s judgment about and intentions concerning the repatriation of foreign earnings could also significantly impact the provision for income taxes. Management reassesses its judgment regularly, taking into consideration the potential tax impacts of these judgments and intentions.

Our provision for income taxes is subject to volatility and could be affected by earnings that are different than those anticipated in countries which have lower or higher tax rates; by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; by transfer pricing adjustments; by tax effects of share-based compensation; and/or changes in tax laws, regulations, and accounting principles, including accounting for uncertain tax positions, or interpretations thereof.  There can be no assurance that these items will remain stable over time. 

In addition, we are subject to examination of our income tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and otherrelevant tax authorities.authorities in the jurisdictions in which we are subject to taxes.  We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.  There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have a significant effect on our operating results, financial condition, and cash flows.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND TRENDS

We serve the aerospace and energy markets.

Aerospace Markets

Our aerospace products are primarily used to provide propulsion, actuation and motion control systems in both commercial and militarydefense fixed-wing aircraft and rotorcraft, as well as in weapons and defense systems.

Commercial and Civil Aircraft – In the commercial aerospace markets, global air traffic continued to improvegrow in fiscal year 2012.2013.  Commercial aircraft production has increased as aircraft operators continue to take delivery of more fuel efficient aircraft and retire older, less efficient aircraft.  This trend toward more fuel efficient aircraft favors our product offerings because we generally have more content on the newer generation of aircraft that recently entered or are scheduled to go into production over the next several years.  We have been awarded content on the Airbus A320neo, Bell 429, Boeing 737 MAX, 787 and 747-8, Bombardier CSeries, Comac 919, Irkut MS-21 and a variety of business jet platforms.  We continuouslycontinue to explore opportunities on new engine and aircraft programs that are under consideration or have been recently announced.

Defense – The defense industry is being negatively impacted by the sequestration of appropriations under the Budget Act, as well as the threat of additional budget cuts and related program delays, as well as the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act.delays.  Our involvement with a wide variety of militarydefense programs in fixed-wing aircraft, rotorcraft and weapons systems has provided relative stability for our defense market sales.sales, although the levels of future defense spending remain uncertain.  Key programs on which our deliveries have been stable or growing include the F/A-18 E/F, the F-35 (Joint Strike Fighter), and the Black Hawk and Apache helicopter programs.  In fiscal year 2011, we were awardedWe have significant motion control system content for the fuelingrefueling boom on the KC-46 air tanker program. Sustainment funds continue to be prioritized to platforms that we have content on and accordingly, our military aftermarket has remained steady throughout this cycle. In addition, major upgrades/overhauls are planned for fiscal year 2013.program, which continues in development.  

We continue to explore opportunities on next generation smart weapon systems, including enhanced guided bomb and guided rocket programs, and turret controls and remote weapon stations.controls.  Weapons programs for which we have significant sales include the JDAM guided tactical weapon system and the M1A1 Abrams tank turret control system.

Aftermarket – Our commercial aftermarket business has increased as our products have been selected for new aerospace platforms and our content has increased across existing platforms.  We have experienced the strongest gains in commercial aftermarket sales related to programs like Airbus A320 and Boeing 777.  However, some legacy programs have been

34


negatively impacted by the availability of surplus hardware from aircraft retirements (and subsequent disassembly for parts re-use) combined with increasingly tight budget control by airline maintenance departments, the result of which was somewhat slower total growth in fiscal year 2013 than had been experienced in recent years.  U.S. Government sustainment funds continue to be prioritized to defense aircraft platforms that we have content on and accordingly, our defense aftermarket has remained steady throughout this cycle.  While some major upgrades/overhaul programs executed in fiscal year 2013 contributed to a strong defense aftermarket performance, we expect fiscal year 2014 sales to be impacted by a “gap” in such programs before they resume in 2015.     

Energy Markets

Our energy products are used worldwide in globalelectric power generation and distribution and storage,systems, and to control energyengines and turbines in industrial, mobile and marine applications.

Industrial Turbines and Compressors – In fiscal year 2012, the2013,  segments of industrial turbine market continued to recover from the economic downturn that began in fiscal year 2009.  In addition to the increased production rates byin some of our OEM customers,markets, we gainedhave higher content on athe newer generation of turbines that deliver improved fuel efficiency and lower emissions.  We also increased market share by successfully adding customers for our product offerings.  We anticipate that long-term power needs in developed and developing regions, as well as backup power for renewable resource generators such as wind turbines, should cause industrial turbine demand to continue to improve.  The aftermarket segment of the industry has been favorably impacted by service needs related to turbine installations early in the preceding decade.

As power generation demand continues to improve, turbines are expected to provide a compelling solution due to their inherent low emissions and fast permitting and construction times, along with the abundant availability of reasonably priced natural gas.  Further, gas turbines are expected to serve a critical market need in supporting renewable assets in providing fast start and load acceptance during times when renewable sources fluctuate.  OEM turbine manufacturers have been increasingly investing in new technologies focused on emissions, part load operation, start times, and fuel flexibility.flexibility, all of which are technologies supported by our products. 

In the oil and gas process industry, demand for industrial gas, steam turbines and compressors is expected to grow, primarily due to increased demand for oil and natural gas products. Exploration,reliable power.  Extraction, production, distribution and processing of oil and gas products utilize both gas and steam turbines, as well as compressors.  Increased construction of floating production storage and offloading platforms, and gas-to-liquids facilities to convert natural gas to liquid natural gas is expected to drive demand for aeroderivative, steam turbine and compressor applications.    These types of projects have long lead times, are dependent on the development of a basic level of infrastructure not currently fully developed, and require significant capital investment.

Reciprocating Engines – The economic recovery wethat began to see in fiscal year 2010 continued throughout fiscal year 2012, primarily due to2013,  albeit at a much slower pace.  We experienced increased demand for natural gas-fueled mobile and other industrial equipment, whilebut declining demand for power generation engines remained steady and marine engines declined.engines.  Demand for small and large natural gas engines, including engines used in alternative fuel vehicles industrial equipment, and electric power generation, continued to recoverstrengthen throughout fiscal year 2012 and equipment manufacturers increased their production schedules. We believe interest in using non-petroleum (alternative) fuels,2013, particularly in China, Korea, and India, is drivingIndia.

The increasing demand for small natural gas engines.

Demand for small and large diesel engines stabilized inthat had continued through fiscal year 2010 and we continued to recover in these markets2012 declined throughout fiscal year 2012. We believe that broad commodity demand is driving continued investments2013 due to declines in engine-poweredthe shipbuilding, mining equipment, and construction equipment. Demand for diesel engine-powered electric generation equipment was stable in fiscal 2012, while demand for large marine diesel engines declined.industries. 

Longer term, government emissions requirements across many regions and engine applications is driving demand for higher-technology control systems, as is customer demand for improved engine efficiencies.  Energy policies in some countries encourage the use of natural gas and other alternative fuels over carbon-rich petroleum fuels, thereby increasing demand for our alternative fuel clean engine control technologies.

Renewable Power – The renewable power industry remains challenged as a result of concerns regarding government support, competitive pricing, and capacity and availability in the credit markets for wind and solar projects.  We expect the uncertainty regarding government renewable mandates and subsidies will contribute to continued volatility in the renewable energy industry.  In the longer term, we anticipate improvement in the market as demand for low emission power sources increases and technology advancements allow renewable energy to be more competitive with conventional energy sources.

Electrical Power Generation and Distribution – The electrical power generation and distribution markets continued to recoverexperienced decline in fiscal year 2012 as2013 due to tightened credit markets and decreased global energy demand.  Slow global economic growth has reduced the stress on electrical grid infrastructure, reducing demand for power generation control and protection technologies. 

Looking forward, we anticipate that tightening emissions requirements, integration of renewable energy sources into the grid, and increased global energy demand improved despite a continued tight global credit marketwill drive new opportunities for advanced control and uncertainty over government stimulus packages.protection solutions.

We are seeing improving demand for our power sensing and control equipment in line with the global recovery in these markets. The global economic recovery, especially in developing economies, is beginning to drive increased global power demand.

35


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures

EBIT, Adjusted EBIT, EBITDA, Adjusted earnings per share, and free cash flow

Earnings before interest and taxes  (“EBIT”), earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), adjusted EBIT, adjusted earnings per diluted share, Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business, Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business, and free cash flow are financial measures not prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  

Earnings based non-U.S. GAAP financial measures

Management uses EBIT to evaluate Woodward’s performance without financing and tax related considerations, as these elements may not fluctuate with operating results.   Management uses EBITDA in evaluating Woodward’s operating performance, making business decisions, including developing budgets, managing expenditures, and forecasting future periods, and evaluating capital structure impacts of various strategic scenarios. Securities analysts, investors and others frequently use EBIT and EBITDA in their evaluation of companies, particularly those with significant property, plant, and equipment, and intangible assets subject to amortization.

EBIT and EBITDA for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011  were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Net earnings

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

$

132,235 

Income taxes

 

53,629 

 

 

56,218 

 

 

55,332 

Interest expense

 

26,703 

 

 

26,003 

 

 

25,399 

Interest income

 

(273)

 

 

(542)

 

 

(534)

EBIT

 

226,001 

 

 

223,268 

 

 

212,432 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

36,979 

 

 

32,809 

 

 

34,993 

Depreciation expense

 

37,254 

 

 

35,808 

 

 

40,400 

EBITDA

$

300,234 

 

$

291,885 

 

$

287,825 

Management uses adjusted EBIT to evaluate Woodward’s performance without specific charges of $15,707 related to its renewable power business.  During the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, Woodward made a decision to align its renewable power business appropriately for the current environment and foreseeable future, through revaluation of its assets and liabilities, including workforce management actions, which resulted in charges to earnings totaling $15,707.  Management does not consider these specific charges usual operating results and, therefore, they have been excluded for prior year comparative purposes.  As management believes adjusted EBIT provides more comparable year over year information, we have included this non-U.S. GAAP measure in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” to provide insight to securities analysts, investors, and others into how our management views our current financial condition and results of operations. 

Adjusted EBIT for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

Net earnings

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

 

132,235 

Income taxes

 

53,629 

 

 

56,218 

 

 

55,332 

Interest expense

 

26,703 

 

 

26,003 

 

 

25,399 

Interest income

 

(273)

 

 

(542)

 

 

(534)

EBIT

 

226,001 

 

 

223,268 

 

 

212,432 

Renewable power business specific charges

 

15,707 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Adjusted EBIT

$

241,708 

 

$

223,268 

 

$

212,432 

36


Management uses adjusted earnings per diluted share to evaluate Woodward’s performance without the specific charges of $15,707, or $0.17 per diluted share, related to its renewable power business and the favorable $0.07 per diluted share impact of the fiscal year 2012 retroactive portion of the reinstatement of the U.S. research and experimentation credit under the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the “Taxpayer Relief Act”).  Management does not consider these specific charges and the favorable impact of the fiscal year 2012 portion of the reinstatement of the U.S. research and experimentation credit usual operating results and therefore they have been excluded for prior year comparative purposes.  As management believes adjusted earnings per share provides more comparable year over year information, we have included this non-U.S. GAAP measure in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” to provide insight to securities analysts, investors, and others into how our management views our current financial condition and results of operations. 

Adjusted earnings per share for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

Earnings per diluted share

$

2.10 

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.89 

Renewable power business specific charges

 

0.17 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Impact of the fiscal 2012 retroactive portion of the reinstatement of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    U.S. research and experimentation tax credit

 

(0.07)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Adjusted earnings per diluted share

$

2.20 

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.89 

In addition to the above non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, in the current fiscal year we are using the following financial measures: Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business and Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business, which are financial measures not prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  Management uses these financial measures to compare the performance of its business with and without the effects of significant discrete economic events in order to analyze and understand Woodward’s Energy reportable segment results.   Management has identified the changes in the market economics of its renewable power business as such a significant discrete economic event.  Management used this with and without the renewable power business segment net sales and segment net earnings information in its decision to align its renewable power business appropriately for the current environment and foreseeable future.  In addition, management used this with and without the renewable power business information for prior year comparative purposes for the Energy segment.  As management believes Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business and Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business provide more comparable year over year information, we have included this non-U.S. GAAP measure in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” to provide insight to securities analysts, investors, and others into how our management views our current financial condition and results of operations. 

The use of any of these non-U.S. GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  As EBIT, EBITDA, adjusted EBIT, adjusted earnings per share, Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business, and Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business exclude certain financial information compared with net earnings, net earnings per share, segment net sales and segment earnings, the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures, users of this financial information should consider the information that is excluded.  Our calculations of EBIT, EBITDA, adjusted EBIT, adjusted earnings per share, Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business, and Energy segment earnings may differ from similarly titled measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. 

Cash flow-based non-U.S. GAAP financial measures

Management uses free cash flow, which is defined as net cash flows provided by operating activities less payments for property, plant and equipment, in reviewing the financial performance of Woodward’s various business groups and

37


evaluating cash levels.  Securities analysts, investors, and others frequently use EBIT, EBITDA and free cash flow in their evaluation of companies, particularly those with significant property, plant, and equipment, and intangible assets that are subject to amortization.companies.  The use of thesethis non-U.S. GAAP financial measuresmeasure is not intended to be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As EBIT and EBITDA exclude certain financial information compared with net earnings, the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, users of this financial information should consider the information that is excluded.  Free cash flow does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs.  Our calculationscalculation of EBIT, EBITDA and free cash flow may differ from similarly titled measures used by other companies, limiting theirits usefulness as a comparative measures.measure.

EBIT and EBITDA for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 were as follows:

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Net earnings

  $141,589   $132,235   $111,162  

Income taxes

   56,218    55,332    43,713  

Interest expense

   26,003    25,399    29,385  

Interest income

   (542  (534  (509
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBIT

   223,268    212,432    183,751  

Amortization of intangible assets

   32,809    34,993    35,114  

Depreciation expense

   35,808    40,400    40,502  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBITDA

  $291,885   $287,825   $259,367  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Free cash flow for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 waswere as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012 2011 2010 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $144,113   $114,623   $184,572  

$

222,592 

 

$

144,113 

 

$

114,623 

Payments for property, plant and equpment

   (64,900  (48,255  (28,104
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Payments for property, plant and equipment

 

(141,600)

 

 

(64,900)

 

 

(48,255)

Free cash flow

  $79,213   $66,368   $156,468  

$

80,992 

 

$

79,213 

 

$

66,368 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Special Items

2010 net earnings included the following benefit related to special items:

 

   Year Ended 
   September 30, 2010 
       Per Share 

Favorable resolutions of prior year tax matters and completion of certain internal revaluation assessments

  $6,416    $0.09  

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operational Highlights

Net sales for fiscal year 20122013 increased 9.0%3.8% to $1,865,627$1,935,976 from $1,711,702$1,865,627 for fiscal year 2011.2012.

EBIT increased $10,836,$2,733, or 5.1%1.2%, to $223,268$226,001 in fiscal year 20122013 compared to $212,432$223,268 for fiscal year 2011.2012.

Net earnings attributable to Woodward increased by 7.1%3.1% for fiscal year 20122013 to $145,942, or $2.10 per diluted share, from $141,589, or $2.01 per diluted share, from $132,235,in fiscal year 2012.

The third quarter of fiscal year 2013 included specific charges of $15,707, or $1.89$0.17 per diluted share, related to our renewable power business.  Uncertainty with respect to U.S. and other government renewable power incentives and economic factors associated with alternative energy sources resulted in significant overcapacity and financial distress in the renewable power industry.  As a result, we made a decision to align our renewable power business appropriately for the environment and then foreseeable future, through revaluation of its assets and liabilities, including workforce management actions.

On December 27, 2012, Woodward entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement with GE Aviation Systems LLC (the “Seller”) and General Electric Company for the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities related to the Seller’s thrust reverser actuation systems business located in Duarte, California (the “Duarte Business”) for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000.  The sale was completed on December 28, 2012, and, based on preliminary purchase adjustments, we paid cash at closing in the amount of $198,900.

The Duarte Business develops and manufactures motion control technologies and platforms, more specifically thrust reverser actuation systems.  The Duarte Business serves customers such as Airbus, Boeing, General Electric, Safran and the U.S. Government.  Its products are used primarily on commercial aircraft, such as the Boeing 737, 747 and 777, and the Airbus A320.  The Duarte Business is being integrated into Woodward’s Aerospace segment and has been included in our operating results since the acquisition.  The Duarte Business was slightly accretive to net earnings in fiscal year 2011.2013.

Liquidity Highlights

Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 20122013 was $144,113$222,592 compared to $114,623$144,113 for fiscal year 2012.  Accounts receivable utilized $9,774 of cash in fiscal year 2013 compared to $59,061 of cash utilized in fiscal year 2012, accounting for the majority of the change.  The amount of cash utilized for accounts receivable in fiscal year 2013 reflects a slight increase in accounts receivable in fiscal year 2013 as compared to fiscal year 2012.  The higher utilization in fiscal year 2012 reflects the significant increase in accounts receivable in fiscal year 2012 when compared to fiscal year 2011 due to higher sales in fiscal year 2012 as compared to fiscal year 2011.  The increase in operating cash flows was primarilyalso attributable to changesoperational improvements, which lowered inventory requirements in inventory, whichfiscal year 2013.  Inventory utilized $18,702$1,485 of cash in fiscal year 20122013 compared to $76,643$18,702 of cash utilized in fiscal year 2011, partially offset by a decrease in accrued variable compensation in fiscal year 2012 and an increase in accounts receivable due to higher sales.2012.

Free cash flow for fiscal year 20122013 was $79,213$80,992 compared to $66,368$79,213 for fiscal year 2011.2012.

EBITDA increased by $4,060$8,349 to $300,234 for fiscal year 2013 from $291,885 for fiscal year 2012 from $287,825 for fiscal year 2011.2012.

38


On January 4, 2012,July 10, 2013, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility, which had an expiration date of October 2012, by entering into aterminated the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Revolver”“Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) withand entered into a new revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) between Woodward and a syndicate of lenders led by JPMorgan ChaseWells Fargo Bank, N.A.,National Association, as administrative agent.  The Revolving Credit Agreement matures in July 2018.  As compared to the Third Amended Revolver extendedand Restated Credit Agreement, the prior revolving credit facility’s maturity to January 2017. The borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Agreement increased from $225,000$400,000 to $400,000 and$600,000.  Subject to lenders’ participation, we have the option subject to the lenders’ participation, to expand the commitment increased from $125,000 to $200,000, for a total borrowing capacity of up to $600,000.$800,000, under the Revolving Credit Agreement.

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the term loan credit agreement that we entered into in October 2008, which had a balance of $40,000 at December 31, 2012, was repaid and terminated, without penalty, and the remaining balance of unamortized debt issuance costs of $128 were written off to interest expense.

In connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business on December 21, 2012, we entered into a 364 day, uncommitted line of credit with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Line of Credit”).  The Line of Credit provides for unsecured loans of up to $200,000 on a revolving basis.  At Woodward’s option, loans made under the Line of Credit bear interest at a floating rate based on either the prime rate or an adjusted London Interbank Rate (“LIBOR”).  The Line of Credit extends through December 20, 2013.  There was $200,000 outstanding on the Line of Credit as of September 30, 2013.

At September 30, 2012,2013, we held $61,829$48,556 in cash and cash equivalents, and had total outstanding debt of $392,204.$550,000.  At September 30, 2012,2013, under our $400,000 Amended Revolver,Revolving Credit Agreement, we had additional borrowing availability of $394,080,$595,486, net of outstanding letters of credit, andcredit.  On September 30, 2013, we had additional borrowing availabilitycapacity of $20,587$28,227 under our Chinese credit facility, various foreign lines of credit, and foreign overdraft facilities.

The following table setstables set forth selected consolidated statementstatements of earnings data as a percentage of net sales for each period indicated:

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 
      % of Net
Sales
     % of Net
Sales
     % of Net
Sales
 

Net sales

  $1,865,627    100.0 $1,711,702    100.0 $1,457,030    100.0

Cost of goods sold

   1,303,344    69.9    1,198,153    70.0    1,021,516    70.1  

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

   164,512    8.8    148,903    8.7    135,880    9.3  

Research and development costs

   143,274    7.7    115,633    6.8    82,560    5.7  

Amortization of intangible assets

   32,809    1.8    34,993    2.0    35,114    2.4  

Interest expense

   26,003    1.4    25,399    1.5    29,385    2.0  

Interest income

   (542  (0.0  (534  (0.0  (509  (0.0

Other (income) expense, net

   (1,580  (0.1  1,588    0.1    (1,791  (0.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Consolidated costs and expenses

   1,667,820    89.4    1,524,135    89.0    1,302,155    89.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Earnings before income taxes

   197,807    10.6    187,567    11.0    154,875    10.6  

Income tax expense

   56,218    3.0    55,332    3.2    43,713    3.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Net earnings

   141,589    7.6    132,235    7.7    111,162    7.6  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest, net

   —      —      —      —      (318  (0.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

  $141,589    7.6 $132,235    7.7 $110,844    7.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

% of Net Sales

 

 

 

 

% of Net Sales

 

 

 

 

% of Net Sales

Net sales

 

$

1,935,976 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,865,627 

 

100 

%

 

$

1,711,702 

 

100 

%

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

1,376,271 

 

71.1 

 

 

 

1,303,344 

 

69.9 

 

 

 

1,198,153 

 

70.0 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

 

168,097 

 

8.7 

 

 

 

164,512 

 

8.8 

 

 

 

148,903 

 

8.7 

 

Research and development costs

 

 

130,250 

 

6.7 

 

 

 

143,274 

 

7.7 

 

 

 

115,633 

 

6.8 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

36,979 

 

1.9 

 

 

 

32,809 

 

1.8 

 

 

 

34,993 

 

2.0 

 

Interest expense

 

 

26,703 

 

1.4 

 

 

 

26,003 

 

1.4 

 

 

 

25,399 

 

1.5 

 

Interest income

 

 

(273)

 

(0.0)

 

 

 

(542)

 

(0.0)

 

 

 

(534)

 

(0.0)

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(1,622)

 

(0.1)

 

 

 

(1,580)

 

(0.1)

 

 

 

1,588 

 

0.1 

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

1,736,405 

 

89.7 

 

 

 

1,667,820 

 

89.4 

 

 

 

1,524,135 

 

89.0 

 

Earnings before income taxes

 

 

199,571 

 

10.3 

 

 

 

197,807 

 

10.6 

 

 

 

187,567 

 

11.0 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

53,629 

 

2.8 

 

 

 

56,218 

 

3.0 

 

 

 

55,332 

 

3.2 

 

Net earnings

 

$

145,942 

 

7.5 

 

 

$

141,589 

 

7.6 

 

 

$

132,235 

 

7.7 

 

Other select financial data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

Working capital

$

544,017 

 

$

623,609 

Short-term borrowings

 

 -

 

 

329 

Total debt

 

550,000 

 

 

392,204 

Total stockholders' equity

 

1,142,545 

 

 

1,008,115 

39


2013 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

20122013 Sales Compared to 20112012

Consolidated net sales increased 9.0%3.8% from $1,711,702 in fiscal year 2011 to $1,865,627 in fiscal year 2012.

2012 to $1,935,976 in fiscal year 2013.  Details of the changes in consolidated net sales are as follows:

Consolidated net sales for the period ended September 30, 2012

$

1,865,627 

Aerospace organic volume

35,282 

Energy volume

(96,538)

Price and sales mix

24,254 

Duarte Business acquisition

111,261 

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

(3,910)

Consolidated net sales for the period ended September 30, 2013

$

1,935,976 

 

Consolidated net sales at September 30, 2011

  $1,711,702  

Aerospace segment volume

   33,678  

Energy segment volume

   119,979  

Price and sales mix

   21,078  

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

   (20,810
  

 

 

 

Consolidated net sales at September 30, 2012

  $1,865,627  
  

 

 

 

The increase in net sales infor fiscal year 20122013 was primarily attributable to the Duarte Business acquisition, increased volumes in our Aerospace segment due to increased commercial OEM and defense aftermarket sales, volume increasespartially offset by decreased volumes in our Energy segment. Inverters forsegment attributable to significantly lower wind turbines, control systems for smallturbine converter sales.  Wind turbine converter sales through our renewable power business were higher in the prior fiscal year due to accelerated ordering by our customers in an effort to take advantage of the then-expiring government incentives and large natural gas engines, and industrial gas turbines were leading contributors to increasedcomply with various renewable energy mandates.  The balance of the decline in wind turbine converter sales in our Energy segment. Increased sales within our Aerospace segmentthe current year reflects general uncertainty with respect to investments in fiscal year 2012 were primarily attributable to strong military and commercial aftermarket and commercial OEM sales, along with increased sales in military OEM.

large wind projects. 

Price changes:Increases in selling prices were driven primarily by price increases related to both OEM and aftermarket sales within our Aerospace segment.segment markets.  Selling prices in the Energy segment were relatively unchanged from the prior year, consistent with prevailing market conditions.also increased due to standard business practice in response to inflationary increases in production and material costs.

Foreign currency exchange rates:During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012,2013, our net sales were negatively impacted by $20,810$3,910 due to changesunfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, compared to the same period of fiscal year 2011.2012.

Our worldwide sales activities are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars (“USD”), European Monetary Units (the “Euro”), Great Britain pounds (“GBP”), Japanese yen (“JPY”), and Chinese yuan (“CNY”).  As the USD, Euro, GBP, JPY, and CNY fluctuate against each other and other currencies, we are exposed to gains or losses on sales transactions.  If the CNY, which the Chinese government has not historically allowed to fluctuate significantly against USD, is allowed to fluctuate against USD in the future, we would be exposed to gains or losses on sales transactions denominated in CNY.

2013 Costs and Expenses Compared to 2012

Cost of goods soldincreased by $72,927 to $1,376,271or 71.1% of net sales, forfiscal year 2013 from $1,303,344, or 69.9% of net sales, for 2012.  Gross margins (as measured by net sales less cost of goods sold, divided by net sales) were 28.9% for fiscal year 2013 and 30.1% for fiscal year 2012.  The decrease in gross margin in fiscal year 2013 as compared to fiscal year 2012 is attributable to the decreased volume in our Energy segment, mostly due to reduced wind turbine converter sales volumes and the loss of related fixed cost leverage, as well as charges of $8,300 associated with a portion of the specific charges in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 related to the renewable power business within the Energy segment, partially offset by the effects of increased volume in our Aerospace segment, favorable product mix and improved operational performance.    

40


Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $3,585 or 2.2%, to $168,097 for fiscal year 2013 as compared to $164,512 for fiscal year 2012.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of net sales to 8.7% for fiscal year 2013 as compared to 8.8% for fiscal year 2012.  The increase in expenses was primarily related to charges of $7,407 associated with a portion of the specific charges in the third quarter of the current fiscal year related to our renewable power business within the Energy segment.  In addition, fiscal year 2013 selling, general, and administrative expenses included approximately $1,944 of transaction costs related to the Duarte Acquisition as well as a general increase in expenses related to the Duarte Business.    These increases were partially offset by decreased bad debt expenses in fiscal year 2013 as compared to fiscal year 2012.  Fiscal year 2012 expense included charges related to the bankruptcies of several airlines and the credit issues of some of our renewable power customers that did not recur in fiscal year 2013.  We believe at this time that we have no exposure to significant future losses related to these issues.

Research and development costs decreased by $13,024, or 9.1%, to $130,250 for fiscal year 2013 as compared to $143,274 for fiscal year 2012.  Research and development costs decreased as a percentage of net sales to 6.7% for fiscal year 2013 as compared to 7.7% for fiscal year 2012.  Research and development costs decreased primarily due to the completion of development of certain programs and related decreases of materials purchases.  Our research and development activities extend across almost all of our customer base, and we anticipate ongoing variability in research and development as programs continue. 

Amortization of intangible assets increased to $36,979 for fiscal year 2013 compared to $32,809 for fiscal year 2012.  As a percentage of net sales, amortization of intangible assets increased to 1.9% for fiscal year 2013 as compared to 1.8% fiscal year 2012.

Interest expense increased to $26,703, or 1.4% of net sales, for fiscal year 2013 compared to $26,003, or 1.4% of net sales, for fiscal year 2012.

Income taxes were provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 26.9% for fiscal year 2013 compared to 28.4% for fiscal year 2012.    The change in the effective tax rate (as a percentage of earnings before income taxes) was attributable to the following:

Effective tax rate at September 30, 2012

28.4 

%

Extension of research credit recorded in fiscal 2013

(4.8)

Taxes on international activities

1.6 

Other changes, net

1.7 

Effective tax rate at September 30, 2013

26.9 

%

On January 2, 2013, the Taxpayer Relief Act was enacted, which retroactively extended the U.S. research and experimentation tax credit through December 31, 2013.  As a result, income taxes for fiscal year 2013 included a net expense reduction related to the extension of the U.S. research and experimentation tax credit pursuant to the Taxpayer Relief Act, including the fiscal year 2012 retroactive portion of the extension.

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we re-evaluated our strategic alternatives in various international markets and determined that a portion of the undistributed earnings of certain of our foreign subsidiaries that were previously expected to be repatriated to the United States within the foreseeable future will remain indefinitely invested outside the United States to support the growth of future foreign operations.  We accordingly reversed the deferred tax liability associated with repatriating those earnings, which resulted in a tax benefit of $3,326 for fiscal year 2012.  This item is included in the “Taxes on international activities” line in the rate reconciliation above.

The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide unrecognized tax benefits reported in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet was $22,694 at September 30, 2013 and $18,069 at September 30, 2012.  At September 30, 2013, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodward’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $17,838.  At this time, we estimate it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much as $565 in the next twelve months due primarily to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations.  We accrue for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.  Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of $2,066 as of September 30, 2013 and $1,701 as of September 30, 2012.

Woodward’s tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities, and these audits are at various stages of completion at any given time.  With a few exceptions, Woodward’s fiscal years remaining open to examination in the U.S.

41


include fiscal years 2010 and thereafter, and fiscal years remaining open to examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2005 and thereafter.

SEGMENT RESULTS

The following table presents sales by segment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

1,061,477 

 

54.8 

%

 

$

896,083 

 

48.0 

%

 

$

843,032 

 

49.3 

%

Energy

 

 

874,499 

 

45.2 

 

 

 

969,544 

 

52.0 

 

 

 

868,670 

 

50.7 

 

Consolidated net sales

 

$

1,935,976 

 

100.0 

%

 

$

1,865,627 

 

100.0 

%

 

$

1,711,702 

 

100.0 

%

The following table presents earnings by segment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Aerospace

$

166,122 

 

$

130,192 

 

$

129,502 

Energy

 

98,940 

 

 

126,441 

 

 

113,872 

Total segment earnings

 

265,062 

 

 

256,633 

 

 

243,374 

Nonsegment expenses

 

(39,061)

 

 

(33,365)

 

 

(30,942)

Interest expense, net

 

(26,430)

 

 

(25,461)

 

 

(24,865)

Consolidated earnings before income taxes

 

199,571 

 

 

197,807 

 

 

187,567 

Income tax expense

 

53,629 

 

 

56,218 

 

 

55,332 

Consolidated net earnings

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

$

132,235 

The following table presents earnings by segment as a percent of segment net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Aerospace

 

15.7 

%

 

14.5 

%

 

15.4 

%

Energy

 

11.3 

 

 

13.0 

 

 

13.1 

 

2013 Segment Results Compared to 2012

Aerospace

Aerospace segment net sales increased $165,394, or 18.5%, to $1,061,477 for fiscal year 2013 from $896,083 for fiscal year 2012. Segment net sales excluding the Duarte Business were $950,216 for fiscal year 2013.  Organic segment sales for fiscal year 2013 were higher compared to fiscal year 2012, driven primarily by defense aftermarket sales and commercial OEM sales.

Defense aftermarket spare parts and repair sales were up significantly, particularly due to increases related to sales for rotorcraft programs.  Commercial OEM aircraft deliveries of narrow-body and wide-body aircraft have continued to increase based on improved airline demand and new product introduction. 

42


During our second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the sequestration of U.S. federal government appropriations took effect under the Budget Act.  The effect on our fiscal year 2013 results was limited, as we saw strong defense aftermarket sales and slightly lower OEM defense sales.  We expect that the impact of this action will take months to be clarified, as specific sequestration impacts are still undefined and the possibility of future reductions in defense spending remain.  We will continue to monitor any potential long-term effects of the Budget Act on our business.

Aerospace segment earningsincreased by $35,930, or 27.6%, to $166,122 for fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 due to the following:

Earnings at September 30, 2012

$

130,192 

Sales volume

21,341 

Price and sales mix

6,540 

Research and development expense

6,339 

Other, net

1,710 

Earnings at September 30, 2013

$

166,122 

Segment earnings as a percentage of sales increased to 15.7%  in  fiscal year 2013 compared to 14.5% for fiscal year 2012.  The increase in Aerospace segment earnings in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 was primarily the result of sales volume increases, the effects of increased selling prices and favorable mix, and decreased investment in research and development. 

Energy

The following table presents the Energy segment’s external net sales and earnings excluding the results of and charges related to the renewable power business.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

External net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy segment net sales

 

$

874,499 

 

$

969,544 

Less:  Renewable power business segment net sales

 

 

117,086 

 

 

210,629 

Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business

 

$

757,413 

 

$

758,915 

Segment earnings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy segment earnings

 

$

98,940 

 

$

126,441 

Less:  Renewable power business segment earnings

 

 

(5,520)

 

 

13,901 

         Renewable power business specific charges

 

 

(15,707)

 

 

 -

Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business

 

$

120,167 

 

$

112,540 

Segment earnings as a percent of sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy

 

 

11.3% 

 

 

13.0% 

Energy without the renewable power business

 

 

15.9% 

 

 

14.8% 

Uncertainty with respect to U.S. and other government renewable power incentives and economic factors associated with alternate energy sources have resulted in significant overcapacity and financial distress in the renewable power industry.  As a result, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, we made a decision to align our renewable power business appropriately for the environment and then foreseeable future, through revaluation of its assets and liabilities, including workforce management actions.  Although we have changed the alignment of our internal cost structure, including re-evaluating certain

43


markets, we will continue to support our existing customers and strategically pursue future opportunities within the renewable power business. 

As discussed above in “Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures,” Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business and Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business are financial measures not prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  Management uses these financial measures to compare the performance of its business with and without the effects of significant discrete economic events in order to analyze and understand Woodward’s Energy reportable segment results.  Management has identified the changes in the market economics of its renewable power business as such a significant discrete economic event.  Management used this with and without the renewable power business segment net sales and segment net earnings information in its decision to align its renewable power business appropriately for the current environment and foreseeable future.  In addition, management used this with and without the renewable power business information for prior year comparative purposes for the Energy segment.  As management believes Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business and Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business provides more comparable year over year information, we have included this non-U.S. GAAP measure in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” to provide insight to securities analysts, investors, and others into how our management views our current financial condition and results of operations. 

The use of these non-U.S. GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  As Energy segment net sales without the renewable power business and Energy segment earnings without the renewable power business exclude certain financial information compared with segment net sales and segment earnings,  respectively, the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures, users of this financial information should consider the information that is excluded.

Energy segment net sales decreased $95,045, or 9.8%, to $874,499 for fiscal year 2013 from $969,544 for fiscal year 2012.  Excluding the renewable power business sales for all periods, Energy segment net sales for fiscal year 2013 would have been comparable to fiscal year 2012.

Wind turbine converter sales for fiscal year 2013 declined approximately $95,000 as compared to fiscal year 2012.  Wind turbine converter sales were higher in fiscal year 2012 partially due to accelerated ordering by our customers in an effort to take advantage of the then expiring government incentives and to comply with various renewable energy mandates.  The balance of the decline in wind turbine converter sales in fiscal year 2013 was unanticipated and reflected general uncertainty with respect to investments in large wind projects due to the volatility of government incentives, economic uncertainty and overcapacity in the market.

The Taxpayer Relief Act extends the wind tax credit for projects that begin construction in calendar year 2013.  Due to the lengthy planning and ordering cycle involved in these wind turbine projects, the effect of this legislation on our sales in fiscal year 2013 was not material.

Strong sales of compressed natural gas systems and aero-derivative gas turbine systems were offset by softness in other reciprocating engine and heavy-frame industrial turbine systems sales.  Other reciprocating engine and heavy-frame industrial turbine systems sales were negatively impacted by weaker economic conditions, outside of the United States, in the global economy.  Growth in shipbuilding, petrochemical plants and heavy frame turbines, where long lead times and significant investments are required, did not materialize as anticipated due to the continuing economic conditions.

Energy segment earnings decreased by $27,501, or 21.8%, to $98,940 for fiscal year 2013 as compared to fiscal year 2012 due to the following:

Earnings at September 30, 2012

$

126,441 

Sales volume

(39,635)

Price and sales mix

23,873 

Specific charges related to the renewable power business

(15,707)

Research and development expense

4,616 

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

(3,099)

Other, net

2,451 

Earnings at September 30, 2013

$

98,940 

44


Segment earnings as a percentage of sales decreased to 11.3%  in  fiscal year 2013 compared to 13.0% for fiscal year 2012.    The decrease in the Energy segment earnings for fiscal year 2013 as compared to fiscal year 2012 was driven primarily by $15,707 of specific charges, as well as decreased volumes and the loss of related fixed cost leverage, related to our renewable power business.  This was partially offset by the effects of selling prices and favorable product mix and reduced research and development expense.  Foreign currency exchange rates had an unfavorable impact of $3,099 for fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012. 

Excluding the specific charges in fiscal year 2013 and the operations of the renewable power business for all periods, segment earnings were $120,167 for fiscal year 2013 compared to $112,540 for fiscal year 2012.  Excluding the specific charges in fiscal year 2013 and the operations of the renewable power business for all periods, earnings as a percentage of sales were 15.9% for fiscal year 2013 compared to 14.8% for fiscal year 2012.  The increase in segment earnings excluding the specific charges and operations of the renewable power business was due to the effects of selling prices and favorable product mix and reduced research and development expense. 

Nonsegment expenses

Nonsegment expenses for fiscal year 2013 increased to $39,061, or 2.0% of net sales, compared to $33,365, or 1.8% of net sales, for fiscal year 2012.  The increase in nonsegment expenses as a percent of net sales for fiscal year 2013 is primarily attributable to costs of $1,944 associated with the acquisition of the Duarte Business.

2012 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2012 Sales Compared to 2011

Consolidated net sales increased 9.0% from $1,711,702 in fiscal year 2011 to $1,865,627 in fiscal year 2012.

Details of the changes in consolidated net sales are as follows:

Consolidated net sales for the period ended September 30, 2011

$

1,711,702 

Aerospace segment volume

33,678 

Energy segment volume

119,979 

Price and sales mix

21,078 

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

(20,810)

Consolidated net sales for the period ended September 30, 2012

$

1,865,627 

The increase in net sales in fiscal year 2012 was primarily attributable to sales volume increases in our Energy segment. Inverters for wind turbines, control systems for small and large natural gas engines, and industrial gas turbines were leading contributors to increased sales in our Energy segment. Increased sales within our Aerospace segment in fiscal year 2012 were primarily attributable to strong defense and commercial aftermarket and commercial OEM sales, along with increased OEM defense sales. 

Price changes: Increases in selling prices were driven primarily by price increases related to both OEM and aftermarket sales within our Aerospace segment. Selling prices in the Energy segment were relatively unchanged from the prior year, consistent with prevailing market conditions.

Foreign currency exchange rates:During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, our net sales were negatively impacted by $20,810 due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, compared to the same period of fiscal year 2011.

2012 Costs and Expenses Compared to 2011

Variable compensation expense, which is tied to relative financial and operating performance, can vary significantly from fiscal year-to-year. During fiscal year 2012, variable compensation expense decreased $7,776 as compared to fiscal year 2011 and has impacted cost of goods sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research and development expenses.costs.

Cost of goods sold increased by $105,191 to $1,303,344, or 69.9% of net sales, for fiscal year 2012 from $1,198,153, or 70.0% of net sales, for fiscal year 2011. Gross margin (as measured by net sales less cost of goods sold, divided by net sales) of 30.1% for fiscal year 2012 was consistent with the same period of the prior fiscal year’s gross margin of 30.0%

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $15,609, or 10.5%, to $164,512 for fiscal year 2012 as compared to $148,903 for fiscal year 2011 primarily as a result of increases in costs to support our current operations and

45


anticipated sales growth. In addition, bad debt expense increased by approximately $3,200 in fiscal year 2012 in response to the bankruptcies of several airlines and the issues of some of our renewable power customers. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was 8.8% for fiscal year 2012, consistent with 8.7% for fiscal year 2011. Included in selling, general and administrative expenseexpenses for fiscal year 2011 was approximately $2,396, related to the acquisition of IDS.

Research and development costs increased by $27,641, or 23.9%, to $143,274 for fiscal year 2012 as compared to $115,633 for the same period of fiscal year 2011. Research and development costs increased as a percentage of net sales to 7.7% for fiscal year 2012 as compared to 6.8% for fiscal year 2011. The increase in research and development costs iswas due to increased investment within our Aerospace segment in product development as a result of our being awarded a substantial number of significant new system programs.

Amortization of intangible assets decreased to $32,809 for fiscal year 2012 compared to $34,993 for fiscal year 2011. As a percentage of net sales, amortization of intangible assets decreased to 1.8% for fiscal year 2012 as compared to 2.0% for the prior year.

Interest expenseincreased slightly to $26,003, or 1.4% of net sales, for fiscal year 2012 compared to $25,399, or 1.5% of net sales, for the prior fiscal year.

Income taxes were provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 28.4% for fiscal year 2012 compared to 29.5% for fiscal year 2011. The change in the effective tax rate (as a percentage of earnings before income taxes) was attributable to the following:following:

 

Effective tax rate at September 30, 2011

29.5 
29.5

%

Retroactive extension of research credit recorded in fiscal 2011

2.1 
2.1

Research credit in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011

1.9 
1.9

Adjustment of prior period tax issuesitems recorded in the period ending September 30, 2012

(1.5)
(1.5

Adjustment of prior period tax issuesitems recorded in the period ending September 30, 2011

0.3 
0.3

Foreign tax rate differences, including repatriation reserve changeTaxes on international activities

(3.0)
(3.0

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

(0.7)
(0.7

Other changes, net

(0.2
(0.2)

 

Effective tax rate at September 30, 2012

28.4

 

28.4 

%

 

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we re-evaluated our strategic alternatives in various international markets and determined that a portion of the undistributed earnings of certain of our foreign subsidiaries that were previously expected to be repatriated into the United States within the foreseeable future will remain indefinitely invested outside the United States. We accordingly reversed the deferred tax liability associated with repatriating those earnings, resulting in a tax benefit of $3,326 for fiscal year 2012. This item is included in the “Foreign tax rate differences, including repatriation reserve change”“Taxes on international activities” line in the rate reconciliation above.

On December 17, 2010, legislation was enacted that retroactively extended the U.S. research tax credit, which had expired as of December 31, 2009. As a result of this extension, fiscal year 2011 included the effect of recognizing a tax benefit of $3,088 related to the retroactive impact to the prior year. The credit expired again on December 31, 2011 and has not been renewed.2011.

In determining the tax amounts in our financial statements, estimates are sometimes used that are subsequently adjusted in the actual filing of tax returns or by updated calculations. Such adjustments resulted in a net tax benefit of $2,813 and $497 in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, we occasionally have resolutions of tax issuesitems with tax authorities related to prior years due to the conclusion of audits and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations. Such resolutions and statute lapses resulted in a net tax benefit of $1,130 and $2,063 in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The preceding amounts are included in the “Adjustments of prior period items” lines in the above table.

The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide unrecognized tax benefits reported in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet was $18,069 at September 30, 2012 and $16,931 at September September��30, 2011. At September 30, 2012, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodward’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $15,061. At this time, we estimate it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much as $2,190 in the next twelve months due primarily to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations. We accrue for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of $1,701 as of September 30, 2012 and $1,989 as of September 30, 2011.

Woodward’s tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities, and these audits are at various stages of completion at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2004 and forward. Woodward has been subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for fiscal years through 2008. Woodward is subject to U.S. state income tax examinations for fiscal years 2007 and forward.

SEGMENT RESULTS

The following table presents sales by segment:46

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

External net sales:

          

Aerospace

  $896,083     48 $843,032     49 $769,379     53

Energy

   969,544     52    868,670     51    687,651     47  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net sales

  $1,865,627     100 $1,711,702     100 $1,457,030     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents earnings by segment:


 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Aerospace

  $130,192   $129,502   $112,171  

Energy

   126,441    113,872    94,014  

Total segment earnings

   256,633    243,374    206,185  

Nonsegment expenses

   (33,365  (30,942  (22,434

Interest expense, net

   (25,461  (24,865  (28,876

Consolidated earnings before income taxes

   197,807    187,567    154,875  

Income tax expense

   56,218    55,332    43,713  

Consolidated net earnings

  $141,589   $132,235   $111,162  

The following table presents earnings by segment as a percent of segment net sales:

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Aerospace

   14.5  15.4  14.6

Energy

   13.0    13.1    13.7  

2012 Segment Results Compared to 2011

Aerospace

Aerospace

Aerospace segment net salesincreased $53,051, or 6.3%, to $896,083 for fiscal year 2012 from $843,032 for fiscal year 2011. Increased sales during fiscal year 2012 were primarily attributable to strong aftermarket and commercial OEM sales.

Sales for the aerospace aftermarket continued to benefit from increased passenger air traffic and the roll out of new aircraft platforms on which our Aerospace products are used. Commercial OEM aircraft deliveries of narrow-body and wide-body aircraft have increased based on improved airline demand and new product introduction. In addition, the increase in sales continuescontinued to reflect recovering demand for business jets. Military OEM defense sales for fiscal year 2012 increased on the strength of rotocraft and fixed-wing sales, when compared to the prior fiscal year.

Aerospace segment earnings increased $690, or 0.5%, for fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011 due to the following:following:

Earnings at September 30, 2011

  $ 129,502  

Sales volume

   16,678  

Selling price and mix

   18,698  

Research and development expense

   (30,277

Manufacturing costs associated with sales growth and manufacturing productivity

   (7,969

Increase in allowance for losses in accounts receivable

   (2,114

Variable compensation

   4,689  

Other, net

   985  
  

 

 

 

Earnings at September 30, 2012

  $130,192  
  

 

 

 

Earnings at September 30, 2011

$

129,502 

Sales volume

16,678 

Price and sales mix

18,698 

Research and development expense

(30,277)

Manufacturing costs associated with sales growth and manufacturing productivity

(7,969)

Increase in allowance for losses in accounts receivable

(2,114)

Variable compensation

4,689 

Other, net

985 

Earnings at September 30, 2012

$

130,192 

Segment earnings as a percentage of sales decreased to 14.5% in fiscal year 2012 compared to 15.4% for fiscal year 2011. Aerospace segment earnings in fiscal year 2012 were essentially flat when compared to fiscal year 2011 primarily due to increased sales volume, favorable price and sales mix, and reduced variable compensation expense, mostly offset by our increased investment in product development and improved production processes related to our being awarded a substantial number of significant new system programs. Many of the new system programs have expanded more than anticipated in both content and complexity, requiring increased investments in new product development and production process improvements, including programs to streamline production cell layouts and reduce waste in the manufacturing process. In addition, we increased our allowance for losses in accounts receivable in response to the bankruptcies of several airlines.

Energy

Energy segment net sales increased $100,874, or 11.6% to $969,544 for fiscal year 2012 from $868,670 for fiscal year 2011.

Net sales for fiscal year 2012 increased in nearly all of our energy markets. Wind turbine power converter sales increased primarily due to some accelerated ordering by our customers in an effort to take advantage of expiring government incentives and to comply with various renewable energy programs. Wind turbine power converter sales also increased due to market share gains. Net sales also increased in our industrial gas turbine markets and engine markets in which natural gas and other alternative fuels are used, including electric power generation and heavy-duty transportation applications.

Energy segment earnings increased by $12,569, or 11.0%, for fiscal year 2012 as compared to fiscal year 2011 due to the following:following:

Earnings at September 30, 2011

$

113,872 

Sales volume

34,395 

Price and sales mix

(11,033)

Research and development expense

27 

Costs associated with sales growth and manufacturing productivity

(5,771)

Warranty costs

(2,042)

Increase in allowance for losses in accounts receivable

(2,025)

Variable compensation

3,044 

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

34 

Other, net

(4,060)

Earnings at September 30, 2012

$

126,441 

47

 

Earnings at September 30, 2011 .....

  $ 113,872  

Sales volume

   34,395  

Selling price and mix

   (11,033

Research and development expense

   27  

Costs associated with sales growth and manufacturing productivity

   (5,771

Warranty costs

   (2,042

Increase in allowance for losses in accounts receivable

   (2,025

Variable compensation

   3,044  

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

   34  

Other, net

   (4,060
  

 

 

 

Earnings at September 30, 2012

  $126,441  
  

 

 

 

The increase in the Energy segment earnings for fiscal year 2012 as compared to fiscal year 2011 was driven primarily by increased sales volume and decreased variable compensation, partially offset by unfavorable product mix and the impact of pricing pressures, increased costs to support sales growth and manufacturing productivity, increases in allowance for losses in accounts receivable, and increased warranty costs. The increases in costs to support sales growth and manufacturing productivity are in response to the Energy segment’s focus on capturing and maintaining increased market share, particularly in the developing natural gas markets. The increase in allowance for losses in accounts receivable reflects the issues of some of our renewable power customers regarding decreases in available government subsidies and the limited availability of financing in the credit markets to support renewable energy projects.

Non segment expenses

Non segment expenses

Non segment expensesfor fiscal year 2012 increased to $33,365, or 1.8% of net sales, compared to $30,942, or 1.8% of net sales, for fiscal year 2011.

2011 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2011 Sales Compared to 2010

Consolidated net sales increased 17.5% from $1,457,030 in fiscal year 2010 to $1,711,702 in fiscal year 2011, primarily due to volume increases in nearly all of the markets we serve.

Details of the changes in consolidated net sales are as follows:

Consolidated net external sales at September 30, 2010

  $ 1,457,030  

Aerospace segment volume

   70,869  

Aerospace segment customer funded development

   (9,990

Energy segment volume

   165,242  

Price and sales mix

   10,553  

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

   17,998  
  

 

 

 

Consolidated net external sales at September 30, 2011

  $1,711,702  
  

 

 

 

The increase in net sales in fiscal year 2011 was attributable to sales volume increases across both of our segments. Customer funded development decreased slightly in the Aerospace segment. Net sales for fiscal year 2011 were also impacted by favorable price changes and foreign currency exchange rates.

Sales for fiscal year 2011 continued the growth trend we began to experience in the second half of fiscal year 2010. In addition, the global supply chain began to recover some from capacity constraints introduced as the global economy struggled in the past several years.

Price changes: The impact of increases in selling prices across several products were partially offset by decreases in selling prices for some wind related products. Selling price changes are in response to prevailing market conditions.

Foreign currency exchange rates: Our worldwide sales activities are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars (“USD”), European Monetary Units (the “Euro”), Great Britain pounds (“GBP”), Japanese yen (“JPY”), Chinese yuan (“CNY”) and Swiss Francs (“CHF”). During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, our net sales were positively impacted by approximately $17,998 due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, compared to the same period of fiscal year 2010.

2011 Costs and Expenses Compared to 2010

Variable compensation expense, which is tied to relative financial and operating performance, can vary significantly from fiscal year-to-year. During fiscal year 2011, variable compensation expense increased $25,962 as compared to fiscal year 2010 and impacted cost of goods sold, selling general and administrative, and research and development expenses.

Cost of goods soldincreased by $176,637 to $1,198,153, or 70.0% of net sales, for fiscal year 2011 from $1,021,516, or 70.1% of net sales, for fiscal year 2010. Correspondingly, gross margins (as measured by net sales less cost of goods sold, divided by net sales) remained relatively flat at 30.0% for fiscal year 2011 as compared to 29.9% for the same period of the prior fiscal year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $13,023, or 9.6%, to $148,903 for fiscal year 2011 as compared to $135,880 for fiscal year 2010 primarily as a result of increased variable compensation. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of net sales to 8.7% for fiscal year 2011 as compared to 9.3% for fiscal year 2010. Included in selling, general and administrative expense for fiscal year 2011 is approximately $2,396 related to the acquisition of IDS.

Research and development costs increased by $33,073, or 40.1%, to $115,633 for fiscal year 2011 as compared to $82,560 for the same period of fiscal year 2010. Research and development costs increased as a percentage of net sales to 6.8% for fiscal year 2011 as compared to 5.7% for fiscal year 2010. The increase in research and development costs was primarily due to our investment in new product platforms that were awarded and the development of next generation technology. Research and development costs in fiscal year 2011 were also impacted by increased variable compensation.

Amortization of intangible assets decreased slightly to $34,993 for fiscal year 2011 compared to $35,114 for fiscal year 2010. As a percentage of net sales, amortization of intangible assets decreased to 2.0% for fiscal year 2011 as compared to 2.4% for the prior year.

Interest expense decreased to $25,399 for fiscal year 2011 compared to $29,385 for the prior fiscal year. Interest expense as a percent of sales was 1.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, as compared to 2.0% for the fiscal year ended 2010. The decrease in interest expense is due to related debt reductions.

Income taxes were provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 29.5% in fiscal year 2011 compared to 28.2% in fiscal year 2010. The change in the effective tax rate (as a percentage of earnings before income taxes) was attributable to the following:

 

Effective tax rate at September 30, 2010

28.2 

Retroactive extension of research credit recorded in fiscal 2011

(2.1

Research credit in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010

(2.2

Adjustment of prior period tax issues recorded in the period ending September 30, 2011

(0.3

Adjustment of prior period tax issues recorded in the period ending September 30, 2010

5.9

Domestic production activities deduction

(1.2

Foreign tax rate differences

1.1

Other changes, net

0.1

Effective tax rate at September 30, 2011

29.5

During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service concluded an examination of our U.S. Federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2007 and 2008. During the year ended September 30, 2010, we completed certain internal revaluation assessments and certain statues of limitations expired. As a result, we reduced our liability for unrecognized tax benefits by a net favorable amount of $6,416 for the period ended June 30, 2010.

On December 17, 2010, legislation was enacted that retroactively extended the U.S. research tax credit, which had expired as of December 31, 2009. As a result of this extension, fiscal year 2011 included the effect of recognizing a tax benefit of $3,088 related to recognition of the retroactive impact of the prior year.

The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide unrecognized tax benefits reported in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet was $16,931 at September 30, 2011, and $10,586 at September 30, 2010. At September 30, 2011, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodward’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $14,078. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of $1,989 as of September 30, 2011 and $1,431 as of September 30, 2010.

Woodward’s tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities, and these audits are at various stages of completion at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2003 and forward. Woodward has been subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for fiscal years through 2008. Woodward is subject to U.S. state income tax examinations for fiscal year 2007 and forward.

2011 Segment Results Compared to 2010

Aerospace

Aerospace segment net sales increased $73,653, or 9.5%, to $843,032 for fiscal year 2011 from $769,379 for fiscal year 2010. Sales during fiscal year 2011 were higher in nearly all markets we served. Sales for the aerospace aftermarket continued to benefit from increased passenger and cargo air traffic, and the introduction of new aircraft platforms on which Aerospace products are used.

We believe the fleet dynamics of commercial aircraft platforms on which we have content, such as the Airbus A320, the Boeing 777, the Embraer and the Bombardier 70- to 90-seat regional jets, allowed our aftermarket business to be somewhat less negatively impacted by the effects of the recent economic down-cycle than some of our competitors and supported sales growth as a result of a rebound in air traffic. Commercial OEM aircraft deliveries of narrow-body and wide-body aircraft increased based on improved airline demand and new product introduction. The increase in sales continued to reflect recovering demand for business and regional jets and rotorcraft, partially offset by a slight decline in military sales and reduced levels of customer funded development revenue.

Aerospace segment earnings increased $17,331, or 15.5%, for fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010 due to the following:

Earnings at September 30, 2010

  $ 112,171  

Sales volume

   26,485  

Selling price and mix

   17,542  

Customer funded development

   (9,990

Research and development expense

   (5,328

Variable compensation

   (12,307

Worker’s compensation

   (2,983

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

   336  

Other, net

   3,576  
  

 

 

 

Earnings at September 30, 2011

  $129,502  
  

 

 

 

The increase in Aerospace segment earnings in fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010 was primarily the result of sales volume increases, a more favorable price and sales mix due to increased levels of aftermarket sales, partially offset by increased variable compensation and costs associated with new product development, including a reduction in customer funded development. The sales mix during fiscal year 2011 continued to include a higher proportion of aftermarket sales than in fiscal year 2010 as a result of increased air traffic. Earnings as a percentage of sales increased to 15.4% in fiscal year 2011 compared to 14.6% for fiscal year 2010.

Energy

Energy segment net sales increased $181,019, or 26.3% to $868,670 for fiscal year 2011 from $687,651 for fiscal year 2010. Sales for fiscal year 2011 increased in all of our markets and includes $13,545 in net sales associated with the IDS Acquisition. Sales were particularly strong in the large and small engine markets utilizing diesel, gas, including natural gas, and other special fuel sources, which serve primarily construction, agricultural, and on-highway natural gas vehicles.

In addition, we continued to see growth in our industrial steam turbine market, as well as increased deliveries of wind turbine power converters. Although wind turbine converter sales increased in fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010, wind converter demand continued to be impacted by tight lender requirements for project financing and uncertainty regarding government stimulus programs due to a lack of clear policy direction in the United States and elsewhere.

Energy segment earningsincreased by $19,858, or 21.1%, for fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010 due to the following:

Earnings at September 30, 2010

  $94,014  

Sales volume

   60,412  

Selling price and mix

   (7,089

Research and development expense

   (13,906

Variable compensation

   (11,415

Increase in global expansion efforts

   (3,625

Increased costs to support sales growth

   (3,222

Freight and duty costs

   (1,512

Effects of changes in foreign currency rates

   3,923  

Other, net

   (3,708
  

 

 

 

Earnings at September 30, 2011

  $113,872  
  

 

 

 

The increase in the Energy segment earnings for fiscal year 2011 as compared to the prior fiscal year was driven primarily by increased volume, offset partially by increases in research and development, variable compensation and unfavorable selling price and product mix.

Non segment expenses

Non segment expenses for fiscal year 2011 increased to $30,942, or 1.8% of net sales, compared to $22,434, or 1.5% of net sales, for fiscal year 2010. The increase in non segment expenses for fiscal year 2011 is primarily due to increased variable compensation and costs associated with the acquisition of IDS.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We believe liquidity and cash generation are important to our strategy of self-funding our ongoing operating needs.  Historically, we have been able to satisfy our working capital needs, as well as capital expenditures, product development and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations, with cash flow provided by operating activities.  We expect that cash generated from our operating activities, together with borrowings under our Amended Revolver,Revolving Credit Agreement, will be sufficient to fund our continuing operating needs.needs, including capital expansion funding.

As of September 30, 2012,2013, we do not believe that any potential European sovereign debt defaults would have a material adverse affecteffect on our liquidity.  We do not have any significant direct exposure to European government receivables, and our customers do not rely heavily on European government subsidies or other government support.  We will continue to monitor our exposure to risks relating to European sovereign debt.

Our aggregate cash and cash equivalents were $61,829$48,556 and $74,539,$61,829, and our working capital was $623,609$544,017 and $536,936$623,609 at September 30, 20122013 and September 30, 2011,2012, respectively.  Of the $61,829$48,556 of cash and cash equivalents held at September 30, 2012, $39,120 is2013, $42,558 was held by our foreign subsidiaries.  We are not presently aware of any significant restrictions on the repatriation of these funds, although a portion is considered permanently investedindefinitely reinvested in these foreign subsidiaries.  If these funds were needed to fund our operations or satisfy obligations in the United States, they could be repatriated and their repatriation into the United States may cause us to incur additional U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes.  Any additional taxes could be offset, in part or in whole, by foreign tax credits.  The amount of such taxes and application of tax credits would be dependent on the income tax laws and other circumstances at the time these amounts are repatriated.  Based on these variables, it is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if these funds were to be repatriated.

Consistent with business practice common in China, Woodward’s Chinese subsidiary has accepted, in settlement of certain customer accounts receivable from Chinese customers, bank drafts authorized by large, creditworthy Chinese banks.  These bank drafts represent a promise to pay the balance of the receivable at a future date, albeit under payment terms that can be longer than traditional payment terms.  At September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, Woodward had bank drafts of $72,954 and $40,312, respectively, recorded as accounts receivable on its consolidated balance sheets.  The increase in bank drafts is due to increased sales in our Energy segment with respect to sales of compressed natural gas systems and aero-derivative gas turbine systems in China.  Woodward only accepts bank drafts authorized by large, creditworthy banks where the credit risk associated with the bank draft is assessed to be minimal.

On October 1, 2013, we entered into a note purchase agreement (the “2013 Note Purchase Agreement”) relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal amount of $250,000 of its senior unsecured notes in a series of private placement transactions.  We issued the Series G, H and I Notes on October 1, 2013 for an aggregate principal amount of

48


$100,000 and used the proceeds to repay all of the outstanding balance on the Series B Notes due October 1, 2013.  Under the terms of the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, we intend to issue the Series J, K and L Notes for an additional $150,000 aggregate principal amount on November 15, 2013.  The series of notes issued under the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and they may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.  Holders of the notes under the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement are not entitled to any registration rights.  For further discussion of the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, see Note 13, Long-term debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Our Amended Revolver,Revolving Credit Agreement, which we entered into on January 4, 2012, extends the maturity date of our revolving credit facility to January 2017July 10, 2013, matures in July 2018 and provides a borrowing capacity of up to $400,000$600,000 with the option to increase total borrowing capacityavailable borrowings to up to $600,000,$800,000, subject to lenders’ participation.  In the event we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities, we can borrow against our Amended Revolver$600,000 revolving credit facility as long as we are in compliance with all of our debt covenants.  Historically, we have used borrowings under our revolving credit facilities to meet certain short-term working capital needs, as well as for strategic uses, including repurchases of our stock, payments of dividends, and acquisitions.  In addition, we have various foreign credit facilities, some of which are tied to net amounts on deposit at certain foreign financial institutions.  These foreign credit facilities are generally reviewed annually for renewal.  We use borrowings under these foreign credit facilities to finance certain local operations on a periodic basis.

At September 30, 2012, we had no  For further discussion of the Revolving Credit Agreement and our other credit facilities, see Note 12, Credit facilities and short-term borrowings outstanding from our $400,000 Amended Revolver, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and we had $329 of borrowings outstanding from our foreign credit facilities.Short-term borrowing activity during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 were as follows:

Maximum daily balance during the period ..

  $61,576  

Average daily balance during the period

  $31,874  

Weighted average interest rate on average daily balance

   1.69

At September 30, 2012, we had total outstanding debt of $392,204 with additional borrowing availability of $394,080 under our $400,000 Amended Revolver, net of outstanding letters of credit, and additional borrowing availability of $20,587 under various foreign credit facilities. Our Series B notes mature in October 2013 and require a balloon payment of $100,000.Supplementary Data.” 

On October 31, 2012, a Chinese subsidiary of Woodward increased its local credit facility with Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Company by $17,700 to total availability of $22,700, or the local currency equivalent of $22,700.  Any cash borrowings under the local Chinese credit facility are secured by a parent guarantee from Woodward.  The Chinese subsidiary may utilize the local facility for cash borrowings to support its local cash operating needs.

At September 30, 2013, we had total outstanding debt of $550,000, including $200,000 borrowed under the Line of Credit as discussed below, with additional borrowing availability of $595,486 under our Revolving Credit Agreement, net of outstanding letters of credit, and additional borrowing availability of $28,227 under various foreign credit facilities. 

Our 2008 Term Loan, which had a balance of $40,000 at December 31, 2012, was repaid and terminated, without penalty, during the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, and the remaining balance of unamortized debt issuance costs of $128 was written off to interest expense during the quarter. 

In connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business on December 21, 2012, we entered into the Line of Credit.  The Line of Credit provides for unsecured loans to the Company of up to $200,000 on a revolving basis.  Loans made under the Line of Credit bear interest at a floating rate based, at the Company’s option, on either the prime rate or an adjusted LIBOR.  There was $200,000 outstanding on the Line of Credit as of September 30, 2013, which consisted of an adjusted LIBOR loan bearing interest at 1.06% and maturing on October 31, 2013.  Subsequently, the Company renewed the loan to extend the maturity to November 15, 2013.  Subject to lender participation, the Company may renew the loan for one additional period prior to its termination on December 20, 2013. 

We have classified the $200,000 outstanding on the Line of Credit as long-term debt as of September 30, 2013 based on our intention to refinance the $200,000 using new long-term debt facilities and/or our revolving credit facility.  We currently have the ability to utilize our revolving credit facility under the Revolving Credit Agreement to finance the entire $200,000 outstanding balance, if necessary.  

At September 30, 2013, we had no borrowings outstanding on our revolving credit facility under our Revolving Credit Agreement and no borrowings outstanding on our foreign credit facilities.Short-term borrowing activity during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 was as follows:

Maximum daily balance during the period

$

62,154 

Average daily balance during the period

$

27,810 

Weighted average interest rate on average daily balance

2.11% 

We believe we were in compliance with all our debt covenants at September 30, 2012.2013.

In addition to utilizing our cash resources to fund the working capital needs of our business, we evaluate additional strategic uses of our funds, including the repurchase of our stock, payment of dividends, significant capital expenditures, consideration of strategic acquisitions and other potential uses of cash.

49


We intend to establishare currently developing a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area for our Aircraft Turbine Systems business within our Aerospace reporting segment,business.  This campus is intended to addresssupport the growth expected over the next ten years and beyond stimulated by our being awarded a substantial number of new system platforms.platforms, particularly on narrow-body aircraft.  We anticipate investing approximately $200,000$275,000 over the next tenfive years in land, buildings and equipment between our two Rockford area campusescampuses.  These investments are expected to result in Illinoisfuture productivity gains for our existing and approximately doublingnew business.  However, given the significance of the anticipated volumes associated with the new system platforms, we still expect our Rockford area workforce in that locationto increase substantially, by as much as 70%-90% from current levels, by the end of 2021.  We expectare also developing a new campus at our corporate headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado to fundsupport the cost of these Illinois capacity expansions through our cash generated from operations, with potential usecontinued growth of our Amended Revolver as well. In addition, to assist with the funding of this project we expect to receive certain corporate income tax credits that are tied to our employment levels and our Illinois income tax liabilities over approximately the next 20 years, plus certain grants and incentives from Illinois state and local governments.

We are also considering similar undertakings to support continued growth with regard toenergy business by supplementing our existing Colorado manufacturing facilities and corporate headquarters.  We anticipate investing approximately $150,000 over the next five years in land, buildings and equipment for this new campus in Colorado. 

We believe we have adequate access to several sources of contractually committed borrowings and other available credit facilities.  However, we could be adversely affected if the banks supplying our borrowing requirements refuse to honor their contractual commitments, cease lending, or declare bankruptcy.  While we believe the lending institutions participating in our credit arrangements are financially capable,stable, recent events in the global credit markets, including the failure, takeover or rescue by various government entities of major financial institutions, have created uncertainty with respect to credit availability.

Our ability to service our long-term debt, to remain in compliance with the various restrictions and covenants contained in our debt agreements, and to fund working capital, capital expenditures and product development efforts will depend on our ability to generate cash from operating activities, which in turn is subject to, among other things, future operating performance as well as general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other conditions, some of which may be beyond our control.

Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

2011

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

222,592 

 

$

144,113 

 

$

114,623 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(340,042)

 

 

(64,617)

 

 

(87,140)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

102,473 

 

 

(90,461)

 

 

(55,979)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

1,704 

 

 

(1,745)

 

 

(2,544)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(13,273)

 

 

(12,710)

 

 

(31,040)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

61,829 

 

 

74,539 

 

 

105,579 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

48,556 

 

$

61,829 

 

$

74,539 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $144,113   $114,623   $184,572  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (64,617  (87,140  (52,132

Net cash used in financing activities

   (90,461  (55,979  (128,985

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (1,745  (2,544  1,261  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

   (12,710  (31,040  4,716  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   74,539    105,579    100,863  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $61,829   $74,539   $105,579  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

20122013 Cash Flows Compared to 20112012

Net cash flows provided by operating activitiesfor fiscal year 2013 was $222,592 compared to $144,113 in fiscal year 2012.  Accounts receivable utilized $9,774 of cash in fiscal year 2013 compared to $59,061 of cash utilized in fiscal year 2012, accounting for the majority of the change.  The amount of cash utilized for accounts receivable in fiscal year 2013 reflects a slight increase in accounts receivable in fiscal year 2013 as compared to fiscal year 2012.  The higher utilization in fiscal year 2012 reflects the significant increase in accounts receivable in fiscal year 2012 when compared to fiscal year 2011 due to higher sales in fiscal year 2012 as compared to fiscal year 2011.  The increase in operating cash flows was also attributable to operational improvements, which lowered inventory requirements in fiscal year 2013.  Inventory utilized $1,485 of cash in fiscal year 2013 compared to $18,702 of cash utilized in fiscal year 2012.

Net cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal year 2013 was $340,042 compared to $64,617 in fiscal year 2012.  The increase in cash used compared to the same period of the last fiscal year is due primarily to the acquisition of the Duarte Business in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 which utilized $198,860 of cash.  In addition, payments for property, plant and equipment increased by $76,700 to $141,600 in fiscal year 2013 as compared to $64,900 in fiscal year 2012 related mainly to the devlopment of a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area, a new campus at our headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado and the purchase of a building site in Niles, Illinois.

50


Net cash flows provided by financing activities for fiscal year 2013 was $102,473 compared to net cash flows used for financing activities of $90,461 for fiscal year 2012.  During fiscal year 2013, we had net short and long-term borrowings of $157,713 compared to net debt repayments of $33,091 in the prior year.  The higher borrowings in fiscal year 2013 were primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Duarte Business.  We utilized $45,754 to repurchase 1,233 shares of our common stock in fiscal year 2013, compared to $44,110 to repurchase 1,132 shares of our common stock in fiscal year 2012, under our $200,000 stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors in July 2010 (the “2010 Authorization”).  In July 2013, our Board of Directors approved a new stock purchase plan, which replaces the 2010 Authorization, that authorizes the repurchase of up to $200,000 of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will end in July 2016 (the “2013 Authorization”).  We did not repurchase any shares of commons stock in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 under with the 2010 Authorization or the 2013 Authorization.

2012 Cash Flows Compared to 2011

Net cash flows provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2012 was $144,113 compared to $114,623 in fiscal year 2011. The increase of $29,490 iswas primarily attributable to changes in inventory, which utilized $18,702 of cash in fiscal year 2012 compared to $76,643 of cash utilized in fiscal year 2011, partially offset by a decrease in accrued variable compensation in fiscal year 2012 and an increase in accounts receivable due to higher sales.

Net cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal year 2012 was $64,617 compared to $87,140 in fiscal year 2011. The decrease of $22,523 compared to the same period of the last fiscal year is2011 was due primarily to the IDS Acquisition completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 utilizing net cash of $38,944. Cash paid for capital expenditures was $64,900 during fiscal year 2012, compared to $48,255 for fiscal year 2011. Cash from operations funded capital expenditures in both fiscal years.

Net cash flows used in financing activities for fiscal year 2012 was $90,461 compared to $55,979 in net cash flows used for fiscal year 2011. We utilized $44,110 to repurchase 1,132 shares of our common stock in fiscal year 2012, compared to $6,837 to repurchase 208 shares of our common stock in fiscal year 2011. In addition, during fiscal year 2012, we had net debt repayments of $33,091 compared to net debt repayments of $36,601 in the prior fiscal year.year 2011. The average daily balance of borrowings in fiscal year 2012 was $31,874, which was consistent with the prior year’sfiscal year 2011’s average daily balance of $32,762.

2011 Cash Flows Compared to 2010

Net cash flows provided by operating activitiesdecreased by $69,949 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in operating cash flows during fiscal year 2011 was attributable to the utilization of working capital primarily associated with increased investment in inventory levels and accounts receivable. The increase in inventory was due to anticipated deliveries scheduled for coming quarters as well as the effect of carrying higher levels of certain parts and raw materials as a result of some sourcing inefficiencies. Sourcing inefficiencies resulted from long lead times, long shipping requirements of product between manufacturing locations, and volatility in the demand of our customers. While our responses to these conditions led to an increase in inventory, we have not experienced continued sourcing inefficiencies and these sourcing inefficiencies have not had a continuing material adverse impact on our inventory levels.

Net cash flows used in investing activities increased by $35,008 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The increase was due primarily to the IDS Acquisition completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 utilizing net cash of $38,944. Cash paid for capital expenditures was $48,255 during fiscal year 2011, compared to $28,104 for fiscal year 2010. The increase in fiscal year 2011 investment in capital equipment reflected an increase of $15,254 related to the construction of a new aircraft turbine test facility in Rockford, IL. Cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal year 2010 included a $25,000 settlement with the DOJ associated with a liability assumed in the acquisition of MPC. The purchase price we paid in connection with the acquisition of MPC was reduced by a corresponding amount and the payment was recognized as cash used for business acquisition.

Net cash flows used in financing activities decreased by $73,006 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During fiscal year 2011, we had net reduction in short-term borrowings of $18,171, repaid $18,430 in scheduled long-term debt reductions, and paid stockholder dividends of $18,581. In addition, during this same period, we utilized $6,837 to repurchase 208 shares of our common stock in the open market.

During fiscal year 2010, we repaid $128,420 of outstanding long-term debt, including unscheduled prepayments of $98,000, paid stockholders dividends of $17,085, and purchased the remaining 26% non-controlling interest in Woodward India Private Limited, a Woodward consolidated subsidiary (“Woodward India”) for $8,120. As a result of this transaction, Woodward owns 100% of Woodward India. In addition, during the fiscal year 2010, we utilized $4,513 to repurchase 163 shares of our common stock in the open market.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our consolidated contractual obligations and commitments as of September 30, 20122013 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30,

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

Thereafter

 

 

(in thousands)

Long-term debt principal

$

100,000 

 

$

 -

 

$

107,000 

 

$

 -

 

$

200,000 

 

$

143,000 

Interest on debt obligations (1)

 

17,345 

 

 

17,345 

 

 

12,196 

 

 

9,933 

 

 

9,933 

 

 

1,801 

Operating leases

 

8,447 

 

 

6,660 

 

 

4,801 

 

 

4,019 

 

 

2,057 

 

 

4,047 

Purchase obligations (2)

 

287,187 

 

 

20,587 

 

 

150 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

40 

Construction contractual obligation (3)

 

42,880 

 

 

951 

 

 

49 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Other (4)

 

30 

 

 

297 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

22,694 

Total

$

455,889 

 

$

45,840 

 

$

124,196 

 

$

13,953 

 

$

211,990 

 

$

171,582 

(1)

Interest obligations on floating rate debt instruments are calculated for future periods using interest rates in effect as of September 30, 2013.  See Note 13, Long-term debt, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further details on our long-term debt.

On October 1, 2013, we entered into the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal amount of $250,000 of its senior unsecured notes in a series of private placement transactions. 

51

 

   Year Ending September 30, 
   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   Thereafter 
   (in thousands) 

Long-term debt principal

  $7,500    $134,375    $—      $107,000    $—      $143,000  

Interest on debt obligations

   23,559     17,346     17,345     12,196     9,933     11,734  

Operating leases

   7,578     6,014     4,278     3,219     2,805     5,730  

Purchase obligations

   153,599     4,754     96     —       —       —    

Other

   30     30     30     —       —       18,069  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $192,266    $162,519    $21,749    $122,415    $12,738    $178,533  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Purchase obligations include amounts committed under legally enforceable contracts or purchase orders for goods and services with defined terms as to price, quantity, delivery, and termination liability.

Interest obligationsWe issued the Series G, H and I Notes on floating rate debt instrumentsOctober 1, 2013 for an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 and intend to issue the Series J, K, and L Notes in an additional aggregate principal amount of $150,000 on November 15, 2013.  As we did not enter into the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement until after our fiscal year end, the aggregate principal amount issued and related interest payments are calculated for future periods using interest ratesnot included in effect asthe above table.  The principal amounts on the Series G, H, I, J, K and L Notes mature between November 15, 2020 and November 15, 2025.  For further discussion of September 30, 2012. Seethe 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, see Note 13,Long-term debt, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further details on our long-term debt.Data.”

The $18,069

(2)

Purchase obligations include amounts committed under legally enforceable contracts or purchase orders for goods and services with defined terms as to price, quantity, delivery, and termination liability.

(3)

Construction contractual commitments represent estimated amounts to be paid under contracts to construct a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area,  a new campus at our corporate headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado and a new facility in Niles, Illinois.  We anticipate investing approximately $275,000, $150,000 and $50,000 over the next five years in land, buildings and equipment between our two Rockford area campuses, our new campus in Colorado and the new facility in Niles, Illinois, respectively.          

(4)

The $22,694 included in other obligations in the “Thereafter” column represents our best reasonable estimate for uncertain tax positions at this time and may change in future periods, as the timing of the payments and whether such payments will actually be required cannot be reasonably estimated.

The above table does not reflect the following items:

Contributions to our retirement pension benefit plans, which we estimate will total approximately $9,430 in 2013. As of September 30, 2012 our pension plans were underfunded by $36,973

·

Contributions to our retirement pension benefit plans, which we estimate will total approximately $3,662 in 2014.  As of September 30, 2013 our pension plans were underfunded by $248 based on projected benefit obligations.  Statutory pension contributions in future fiscal years will vary as a result of a number of factors, including actual plan asset returns and interest rates.

Contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans, which we estimate will total $4,943 in 2013. Other postretirement contributions are made on a “pay-as-you-go” basis as payments are made to healthcare providers, and such contributions will vary as a result of changes in the future cost of postretirement healthcare benefits provided for covered retirees. As of September 30, 2012, our other postretirement benefit plans were underfunded by $37,550

·

Contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans, which we estimate will total $3,954 in 2014.  Other postretirement contributions are made on a “pay-as-you-go” basis as payments are made to healthcare providers, and such contributions will vary as a result of changes in the future cost of postretirement healthcare benefits provided for covered retirees.  As of September 30, 2013, our other postretirement benefit plans were underfunded by $28,996 based on projected benefit obligations.

·

Business commitments made to certain customers to perform under long-term product development projects, some of which may result in near-term financial losses.  Such losses, if any, are recognized when they become likely to occur. 

In connection with the sale of the F&P product line during fiscal year 2009, Woodward assigned to a subsidiary of the purchaser its rights and responsibilities related to certain customerscontracts with the U.S. Government.  Woodward provided to performthe U.S. Government a customary guarantee of the purchaser’s subsidiary’s obligations under long-term product development projects, some of which may result in near-term financial losses. Such losses, ifthe contracts.  The purchaser and its affiliates have agreed to indemnify Woodward for any are recognized when they become likelyliability incurred with respect to occur.the guarantee.

Guarantees and letters of credit totaling approximately $6,390$5,061 were outstanding as of September 30, 2012,2013, some of which were secured by parent guarantees from Woodward or by Woodward line of credit facilities.

In the event of a change in control of Woodward, as defined in change-in-control agreements with our current corporate officers, we may be required to pay termination benefits to such officers.

New Accounting Standards

From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standards setting bodies issue new accounting pronouncements.  Updates to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”).  Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted in the future, is not expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.

To understand the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted, please review the information provided in our Note 2,New accounting standards, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

 

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

52


Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest rate risk from our long-term and short-term debt, and our postretirement benefit plans, and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to our foreign operations and foreign currency transactions.

Interest Rate Risk

Derivative instruments utilized by us are viewed as risk management tools, involve little complexity, and are not used for trading or speculative purposes.  In June 2013, in connection with Woodward’s expected refinancing of current maturities on its existing long-term debt, Woodward entered into a treasury lock agreement with a notional amount of $25,000 that qualifies as a cash flow hedge under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”  The objective of this derivative instrument is to hedge the risk of variability in cash flows attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate over a seven-year period related to the future interest payments on a portion of anticipated future debt issuances.   To manage interest rate risk related to the $400,000 of long-term debt issued in October 2008, we used a treasury lock, which locked in interest rates on the then future debt.  The treasury lock agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge against interest rate risk on a portion of the debt issued in October 2008.  Similarly, we used a LIBOR lock agreement with a notional amount of $50,000, which hedged the risk of variability in cash flows over a seven-year period related to future interest payments of a portion of the anticipated long-term debt issued in April of 2009 in connection with the acquisition of HRT.

A portion of our long and short-term debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates.  Our term loan of $41,875 at September 30, 2012 and advancesAdvances on our Amended Revolver, ofrevolving credit facility under our Revolving Credit Agreement, which there were none at September 30, 2012, include2013,  and the $200,000 outstanding on our Line of Credit, are at interest rates that fluctuate with market rates.  A hypothetical 1% increase in the assumed effective interest rates that apply to the variable rate loan outstanding on September 30, 2012 and the average borrowings on our Amended Revolverrevolving credit facility in fiscal year 20122013 and the $200,000 outstanding on our Line of Credit would cause our annual interest expense to increase approximately $710.$2,234.  A hypothetical 0.32%0.25% decrease in interest rates that apply to our variable loan outstanding on September 30, 2012 and the average borrowings on our Amended Revolver,revolving credit facility and the $200,000 outstanding on our Line of Credit, which would effectively reduce the variable component of the applicable interest rates to 0%, would decrease our annual interest expense by approximately $230.$562. 

The discount rate and future return on plan asset assumptions used to calculate the funding status of our retirement benefit plans are also sensitive to changes in interest rates.  The discount rate assumption used to value the defined benefit pension plans as of September 30, 20122013 was 4.10%5.15% in the United States, 4.60%4.50% in the United Kingdom, 1.50%1.25% in Japan and 1.75%2.25% in Switzerland.  The discount rate assumption used to value the other postretirement benefit plans was 4.11%5.14%.

The following information illustrates the sensitivity of the net periodic benefit cost and the projected accumulated benefit obligation to a change in the discount rate assumed.  Amounts relating to foreign plans are translated at the spot rate on September 30, 2012.2013.  It should be noted that economic factors and conditions often affect multiple assumptions simultaneously and the effects of changes in assumptions are not necessarily linear due to factors such as the 10% corridor applied to the larger of the postretirement benefit obligation or the fair market value of plan assets when determining amortization of actuarial net gains or losses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/(Decrease) In

Assumption

 

Change

 

2014 Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 

2014 Projected Service and Interest Costs

 

Accumulated Post Retirement Benefit Obligation as of Sept. 30, 2013

Defined benefit pension benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in discount rate

 

1% increase

 

$

(1,136)

 

$

(260)

 

$

(25,230)

 

 

1% decrease

 

 

1,933 

 

 

138 

 

 

30,991 

Other postretirement benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in discount rate

 

1% increase

 

 

(83)

 

 

134 

 

 

(2,266)

 

 

1% decrease

 

 

96 

 

 

(164)

 

 

2,625 

53

 

      Increase/(Decrease) In 
         2013  Post Retirement 
      2013 Net  Projected  Benefit 
      Periodic  Service and  Obligation as of 

Assumption

  Change  Benefit Cost  Interest Costs  Sept. 30, 2012 

Defined benefit pension benefits:

      

Change in discount rate

  1% increase  $(1,795 $(333 $(27,147
  1% decrease   2,876    246    33,569  

Other postretirement benefits:

      

Change in discount rate

  1% increase   154    193    (3,169
  1% decrease   (163  (238  3,712  

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We are impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates when we sell product in currencies different from the currency in which product and manufacturing costs were incurred.  The functional currencies and our purchasing and sales activities primarily include USD, Euro, CNY, JPY and GBP.  We may also be impacted by changes in the relative buying power of our customers, which may impact sales volumes either positively or negatively.  As these currencies fluctuate against each other, and other currencies, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk on sales, purchasing transactions, and labor.  Foreign currency exchange rate risk is reduced through the maintenance of local production facilities in the markets we serve, which we believe creates a natural hedge to our foreign currency exchange rate exposure.  For the year ended September 30, 2012,2013, the percentages of our net sales denominated in a currency other than the USD were as follows:

 

Percentage of

Percentage of Net Sales

For the Year Ended

September 30, 20122013

Functional currency:

Euro

17.4%
13.8% 

CNY

5.8%
7.8% 

JPY

3.9%
3.1% 

GBP

1.8%
1.7% 

All other foreign currencies

2.4%
1.4% 

 

 

27.8% 
31.3

Currency exchange rates vary daily and often one currency strengthens against the USD while another currency weakens.  Because of the complex interrelationship of theour worldwide supply chains and distribution channels, it is difficult to quantify the impact of a particular change in exchange rates.

From time to time, we will enter into a foreign currency exchange rate contract to hedge against changes in foreign currency exchange rates on liabilities expected to be settled at a future date.  Market risk arises from the potential adverse effects on the value of derivative instruments that result from a change in foreign currency exchange rates.  We minimize this market risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types of, and degree to which we enter into, derivative instruments.  We enter into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only.  We do not enter into or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.  As of September 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, we had no open foreign currency exchange rate contracts and all previous derivative instruments were settled or terminated.  For more information on derivative instruments, see Note 6,Derivative instruments and hedging activities,  to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Our reported financial results of operations, including the reported value of our assets and liabilities, are also impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.  The assets and liabilities of substantially all of our subsidiaries outside the United States are translated at period end rates of exchange for each reporting period.  Earnings and cash flow statements are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange.  Although these translation changes have no immediate cash impact, the translation changes may impact future borrowing capacity, debt covenants, and the overall value of our net assets.  In addition, we also have assets and liabilities, specifically accounts receivable, accounts payable and current inter-company receivables and payables, whose carrying amounts approximate their fair value, which are denominated in currencies other than their relevant functional currencies.  Foreign currency exchange rate risk is reduced through several means, including the invoicing of customers in the same currency as the source of the products, the prompt settlement of inter-company balances utilizing a global netting system, and limited use of foreign currency denominated debt.  We recognized net foreign currency losses of $2,738 in fiscal year 2013, losses of $480 in fiscal year 2012 and gains of $575 in fiscal year 2011 and $425 in fiscal year 2010 in “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” of our Consolidated Statements of Earnings related to these assets and liabilities.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

54


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENTINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Woodward, Inc.

Fort Collins, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Woodward, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, stockholders’stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012.2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Indexindex at Item 15.  These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thethese financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Woodward, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012,2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presentspresent fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012,2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 15, 201214, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado

November 15, 2012

14, 2013

55


WOODWARD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(inIn thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

  Year Ended September 30, 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

  2012 2011 2010 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

  $1,865,627   $1,711,702   $1,457,030  

 

$

1,935,976 

 

$

1,865,627 

 

$

1,711,702 

Costs and expenses:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

   1,303,344    1,198,153    1,021,516  

 

 

1,376,271 

 

 

1,303,344 

 

 

1,198,153 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   164,512    148,903    135,880  

 

 

168,097 

 

 

164,512 

 

 

148,903 

Research and development costs

   143,274    115,633    82,560  

 

 

130,250 

 

 

143,274 

 

 

115,633 

Amortization of intangible assets

   32,809    34,993    35,114  

 

 

36,979 

 

 

32,809 

 

 

34,993 

Interest expense

   26,003    25,399    29,385  

 

 

26,703 

 

 

26,003 

 

 

25,399 

Interest income

   (542  (534  (509

 

 

(273)

 

 

(542)

 

 

(534)

Other (income) expense, net (Note 16)

   (1,580  1,588    (1,791

 

 

(1,622)

 

 

(1,580)

 

 

1,588 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total costs and expenses

   1,667,820    1,524,135    1,302,155  

 

 

1,736,405 

 

 

1,667,820 

 

 

1,524,135 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings before income taxes

   197,807    187,567    154,875  

 

 

199,571 

 

 

197,807 

 

 

187,567 

Income tax expense

   56,218    55,332    43,713  

 

 

53,629 

 

 

56,218 

 

 

55,332 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings

   141,589    132,235    111,162  

 

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

$

132,235 

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of taxes

   —      —      (318
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

  $141,589   $132,235   $110,844  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings per share (Note 3):

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward

  $2.06   $1.92   $1.62  

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward

  $2.01   $1.89   $1.59  

Basic earnings per share

 

$

2.13 

 

$

2.06 

 

$

1.92 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

2.10 

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.89 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Note 3):

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

   68,880    68,797    68,472  

 

 

68,392 

 

 

68,880 

 

68,797 

Diluted

   70,307    70,140    69,864  

 

 

69,602 

 

 

70,307 

 

70,140 

Cash dividends per share paid to Woodward common stockholders

  $0.31   $0.27   $0.24  

 

$

0.32 

 

$

0.31 

 

$

0.27 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

56


WOODWARD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

(inIn thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

$

132,235 

Other comprehensive earnings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

7,337 

 

 

(7,291)

 

 

(2,653)

Taxes on changes on foreign currency translation adjustments

 

958 

 

 

2,635 

 

 

1,604 

 

 

8,295 

 

 

(4,656)

 

 

(1,049)

Reclassification of realized losses on derivatives to earnings

 

171 

 

 

174 

 

 

229 

Realized gain on cash flow hedge

 

507 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Taxes on changes on derivative transactions

 

(259)

 

 

(66)

 

 

(86)

 

 

419 

 

 

108 

 

 

143 

Minimum retirement benefit liability adjustments (Note 18):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain (loss) arising during the period

 

26,756 

 

 

(17,960)

 

 

(3,088)

Loss due to settlement arising during the period

 

36 

 

 

56 

 

 

 -

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior service benefit

 

(90)

 

 

(484)

 

 

(805)

Net loss

 

1,770 

 

 

1,280 

 

 

1,339 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes on minimum retirement benefit liabilities

 

673 

 

 

(171)

 

 

(376)

Taxes on changes on minimum retirement benefit liability adjustments

 

(11,021)

 

 

6,478 

 

 

1,120 

 

 

18,124 

 

 

(10,801)

 

 

(1,810)

Total comprehensive earnings

$

172,780 

 

$

126,240 

 

$

129,519 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

57


WOODWARD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Comprehensive earnings attributable to Woodward:

    

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

  $141,589   $132,235   $110,844  

Other comprehensive earnings:

    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (7,291  (2,653  (8,718

Taxes on changes on foreign currency translation adjustments

   2,635    1,604    2,406  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (4,656  (1,049  (6,312

Reclassification of realized losses on derivatives to earnings

   174    229    282  

Taxes on changes on derivative transactions

   (66  (86  (108
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   108    143    174  

Minimum retirement benefit liability adjustments:

    

Prior service (cost) benefit arising during the period

   —      —      (3,963

Net (loss) gain arising during the period

   (17,960  (3,088  7,873  

Loss due to settlement arising during the period

   56    —      345  

Amortization of:

    

Prior service benefit

   (484  (805  (1,517

Net loss

   1,280    1,339    1,525  

Transition obligation asset

   —      —      86  

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (171  (376  60  

Taxes on changes on minimum retirement benefit liability adjustments

   6,478    1,120    (2,058
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (10,801  (1,810  2,351  

Comprehensive earnings attributable to Woodward

   126,240    129,519    107,057  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest:

    

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   —      —      318  

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   —      —      163  

Taxes on changes on foreign currency translation adjustments

   —      —      (58
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   —      —      423  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive earnings

  $126,240   $129,519   $107,480  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

48,556 

 

$

61,829 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $8,872 and $7,217, respectively

 

381,065 

 

 

354,386 

Inventories

 

431,744 

 

 

398,229 

Income taxes receivable

 

14,071 

 

 

7,485 

Deferred income tax assets

 

43,027 

 

 

40,277 

Other current assets

 

38,650 

 

 

41,271 

Total current assets

 

957,113 

 

 

903,477 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

350,048 

 

 

234,505 

Goodwill

 

551,624 

 

 

461,374 

Intangible assets, net

 

285,775 

 

 

235,563 

Deferred income tax assets

 

13,926 

 

 

9,129 

Other assets

 

47,198 

 

 

15,916 

Total assets

$

2,205,684 

 

$

1,859,964 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

$

 -

 

$

329 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

100,000 

 

 

7,500 

Accounts payable

 

145,307 

 

 

124,914 

Income taxes payable

 

7,848 

 

 

14,141 

Deferred income tax liabilities

 

800 

 

 

800 

Accrued liabilities

 

159,141 

 

 

132,184 

Total current liabilities

 

413,096 

 

 

279,868 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

450,000 

 

 

384,375 

Deferred income tax liabilities

 

104,533 

 

 

78,163 

Other liabilities

 

95,510 

 

 

109,443 

Total liabilities

 

1,063,139 

 

 

851,849 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, par value $0.003 per share, 10,000 shares authorized, no shares issued

 

 -

 

 

 -

Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share, 150,000 shares authorized, 72,960 shares issued

 

106 

 

 

106 

Additional paid-in capital

 

101,147 

 

 

97,826 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings

 

15,115 

 

 

(11,723)

Deferred compensation

 

4,007 

 

 

4,344 

Retained earnings

 

1,193,887 

 

 

1,069,811 

 

 

1,314,262 

 

 

1,160,364 

Treasury stock at cost, 4,883  shares and 4,536 shares, respectively

 

(167,710)

 

 

(147,905)

Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, at cost, 232 shares and 276 shares, respectively

 

(4,007)

 

 

(4,344)

Total stockholders' equity

 

1,142,545 

 

 

1,008,115 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$

2,205,684 

 

$

1,859,964 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

58


WOODWARD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)In thousands)

   As of September 30, 
   2012  2011 
ASSETS   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $61,829   $74,539  

Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $7,217 and $2,322, respectively

   354,386    297,614  

Inventories

   398,229    381,555  

Income taxes receivable

   7,485    2,456  

Deferred income tax assets

   40,277    38,270  

Other current assets

   41,271    23,359  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   903,477    817,793  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   234,505    206,725  

Goodwill

   461,374    462,282  

Intangible assets, net

   235,563    268,897  

Deferred income tax assets

   9,129    10,466  

Other assets

   15,916    15,271  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $1,859,964   $1,781,434  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

Current liabilities:

   

Short-term borrowings

  $329   $—    

Current portion of long-term debt

   7,500    18,374  

Accounts payable

   124,914    123,453  

Income taxes payable

   14,141    5,440  

Deferred income tax liabilities

   800    74  

Accrued liabilities

   132,184    133,516  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   279,868    280,857  

Long-term debt, less current portion

   384,375    406,875  

Deferred income tax liabilities

   78,163    85,911  

Other liabilities

   109,443    88,694  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   851,849    862,337  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

   

Stockholders’ equity:

   

Preferred stock, par value $0.003 per share, 10,000 shares authorized, no shares issued

   —      —    

Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share, 150,000 shares authorized, 72,960 shares issued

   106    106  

Additional paid-in capital

   97,826    81,453  

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings

   (11,723  3,626  

Deferred compensation

   4,344    4,581  

Retained earnings

   1,069,811    949,573  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   1,160,364    1,039,339  

Treasury stock at cost, 4,536 shares and 4,070 shares, respectively

   (147,905  (115,661

Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, at cost, 276 shares and 315 shares, respectively

   (4,344  (4,581
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   1,008,115    919,097  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $1,859,964   $1,781,434  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

$

132,235 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

74,233 

 

 

68,617 

 

 

75,393 

Net (gain) loss on sales of assets

 

(100)

 

 

16 

 

 

644 

Stock-based compensation

 

9,414 

 

 

8,628 

 

 

6,590 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 

(5,154)

 

 

(3,990)

 

 

(3,558)

Deferred income taxes

 

8,348 

 

 

(3,730)

 

 

(10,321)

Loss on derivatives reclassified from accumulated comprehensive earnings into earnings

 

171 

 

 

174 

 

 

229 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(9,774)

 

 

(59,061)

 

 

(49,393)

Inventories

 

(1,485)

 

 

(18,702)

 

 

(76,643)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

16,062 

 

 

11,688 

 

 

27,679 

Current income taxes

 

(9,020)

 

 

7,594 

 

 

19,064 

Retirement benefit obligations

 

(15,937)

 

 

801 

 

 

(8,322)

Other

 

9,892 

 

 

(9,511)

 

 

1,026 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

222,592 

 

 

144,113 

 

 

114,623 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments for purchase of property, plant, and equipment

 

(141,600)

 

 

(64,900)

 

 

(48,255)

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

418 

 

 

283 

 

 

59 

Business acquisitions, net of cash and marketable securities acquired

 

(198,860)

 

 

 -

 

 

(38,698)

Business acquisitions, marketable securities acquired

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(8,463)

Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

8,217 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(340,042)

 

 

(64,617)

 

 

(87,140)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends paid

 

(21,866)

 

 

(21,351)

 

 

(18,581)

Proceeds from sales of treasury stock

 

8,370 

 

 

6,286 

 

 

2,482 

Payments for repurchases of common stock

 

(45,754)

 

 

(44,110)

 

 

(6,837)

Excess tax benefits from stock compensation

 

5,154 

 

 

3,990 

 

 

3,558 

Borrowings on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings

 

179,072 

 

 

187,865 

 

 

164,557 

Payments on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings

 

(179,484)

 

 

(187,591)

 

 

(182,728)

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 

200,000 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Payments of long-term debt

 

(41,875)

 

 

(33,365)

 

 

(18,430)

Proceeds from cash flow hedge

 

507 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Payments of debt financing costs

 

(1,651)

 

 

(2,185)

 

 

 -

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

102,473 

 

 

(90,461)

 

 

(55,979)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

1,704 

 

 

(1,745)

 

 

(2,544)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(13,273)

 

 

(12,710)

 

 

(31,040)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

61,829 

 

 

74,539 

 

 

105,579 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

48,556 

 

$

61,829 

 

$

74,539 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements.

59


WOODWARD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSSTOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(inIn thousands)

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net earnings

  $141,589   $132,235   $111,162  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   68,617    75,393    75,616  

Net (gain) loss on sales of assets

   16    644    (131

Stock-based compensation

   8,628    6,590    6,686  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

   (3,990  (3,558  (5,115

Deferred income taxes

   (3,730  (10,321  16,358  

Loss on derivatives reclassified from accumulated comprehensive earnings into earnings

   174    229    282  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

   (59,061  (49,393  (40,688

Inventories

   (18,702  (76,643  5,896  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   11,688    27,679    34,426  

Current income taxes

   7,594    19,064    998  

Retirement benefit obligations

   801    (8,322  (13,672

Other

   (9,511  1,026    (7,246
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   144,113    114,623    184,572  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Payments for purchase of property, plant, and equipment

   (64,900  (48,255  (28,104

Proceeds from sale of assets

   283    59    312  

Business acquisitions, net of cash and marketable securities acquired

   —      (38,698  (25,000

Business acquisitions, marketable securities acquired

   —      (8,463  —    

Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities

   —      8,217    —    

Proceeds from disposal of Fuel & Pneumatics product line

   —      —      660  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (64,617  (87,140  (52,132
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Cash dividends paid

   (21,351  (18,581  (17,085

Proceeds from sales of treasury stock

   6,286    2,482    1,999  

Payments for repurchases of common stock

   (44,110  (6,837  (4,513

Excess tax benefits from stock compensation

   3,990    3,558    5,115  

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —      —      (8,120

Borrowings on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings

   187,865    164,557    106,019  

Payments on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings

   (187,591  (182,728  (83,980

Payments of long-term debt

   (33,365  (18,430  (128,420

Payment of debt financing costs

   (2,185  —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (90,461  (55,979  (128,985
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (1,745  (2,544  1,261  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

   (12,710  (31,040  4,716  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   74,539    105,579    100,863  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $61,829   $74,539   $105,579  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of shares

 

Stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock

 

Common stock

 

Treasury stock

 

Treasury stock held for deferred compensation

 

Common stock

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

Unrealized derivative gains (losses)

 

Minimum retirement benefit liability adjustments

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings

 

Deferred compensation

 

Retained earnings

 

Treasury stock at cost

 

Treasury stock held for deferred compensation

 

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances as of October 1, 2010

 

 -

 

72,960 

 

(4,223)

 

(356)

 

$

106 

 

$

73,915 

 

$

23,152 

 

$

(627)

 

$

(16,183)

 

$

6,342 

 

$

4,888 

 

$

835,919 

 

$

(113,088)

 

$

(4,888)

 

$

803,194 

Net earnings

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

132,235 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

132,235 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(1,049)

 

 

143 

 

 

(1,810)

 

 

(2,716)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(2,716)

Cash dividends

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(18,581)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(18,581)

Purchases of Treasury Stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

(301)

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(9,700)

 

 

 -

 

 

(9,700)

Sales of Treasury Stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

452 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(2,643)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

7,127 

 

 

 -

 

 

4,484 

Tax benefit attributable to exercise of stock options

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

3,558 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

3,558 

Stock-based compensation

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,590 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,590 

Transfer of stock to deferred compensation plan

 

 

 

 -

 

 

(2)

 

 

 -

 

 

33 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

62 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(62)

 

 

33 

Purchase of stock by deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(3)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

87 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(87)

 

 

 -

Distribution of stock from deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

46 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(456)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

456 

 

 

 -

Balances as of September 30, 2011

 

 -

 

72,960 

 

(4,070)

 

(315)

 

 

106 

 

 

81,453 

 

 

22,103 

 

 

(484)

 

 

(17,993)

 

 

3,626 

 

 

4,581 

 

 

949,573 

 

 

(115,661)

 

 

(4,581)

 

 

919,097 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

141,589 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

141,589 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(4,656)

 

 

108 

 

 

(10,801)

 

 

(15,349)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(15,349)

Cash dividends paid

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(21,351)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(21,351)

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1,132)

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(44,110)

 

 

 -

 

 

(44,110)

Sales of treasury stock

   

 -

 

 -

 

454 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(1,542)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

7,720 

 

 

 -

 

 

6,178 

Common shares issued from treasury stock for benefit plans

 

 -

 

 -

 

209 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

5,238 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,097 

 

 

 -

 

 

9,335 

Tax benefit attributable to exercise of stock options

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

3,990 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

3,990 

Stock-based compensation

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

8,628 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

8,628 

Transfer of stock to deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

(3)

 

 

 -

 

 

59 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

108 

 

 

 -

 

 

49 

 

 

(108)

 

 

108 

Purchases of stock by deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

93 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(93)

 

 

 -

Distribution of stock from deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

44 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(438)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

438 

 

 

 -

Balances as of September 30, 2012

 

 -

 

72,960 

 

(4,536)

 

(276)

 

 

106 

 

 

97,826 

 

 

17,447 

 

 

(376)

 

 

(28,794)

 

 

(11,723)

 

 

4,344 

 

 

1,069,811 

 

 

(147,905)

 

 

(4,344)

 

 

1,008,115 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

145,942 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

145,942 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

8,295 

 

 

419 

 

 

18,124 

 

 

26,838 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

26,838 

Cash dividends paid

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(21,866)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(21,866)

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1,395)

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(51,846)

 

 

 -

 

 

(51,846)

Sales of treasury stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

796 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(13,194)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

24,110 

 

 

 -

 

 

10,916 

Common shares issued from treasury stock for benefit plans

 

 -

 

 -

 

250 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,923 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

7,857 

 

 

 -

 

 

9,780 

Tax benefit attributable to exercise of stock options

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

5,154 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

5,154 

Stock-based compensation

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

9,414 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

9,414 

Transfer of stock to deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

(2)

 

 

 -

 

 

24 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

97 

 

 

 -

 

 

74 

 

 

(97)

 

 

98 

Purchases of stock by deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

79 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(79)

 

 

 -

Distribution of stock from deferred compensation plan

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

48 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(513)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

513 

 

 

 -

Balances as of September 30, 2013

 

 -

 

72,960 

 

(4,883)

 

(232)

 

$

106 

 

$

101,147 

 

$

25,742 

 

$

43 

 

$

(10,670)

 

$

15,115 

 

$

4,007 

 

$

1,193,887 

 

$

(167,710)

 

$

(4,007)

 

$

1,142,545 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements.

60


WOODWARD, INC.

CONSOLIDATEDNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(inIn thousands, except per share amounts)

  Number of shares  Stockholders’ equity 
                    Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings                   
  Preferred
stock
  Common
stock
  Treasury
stock
  Treasury
stock held for
deferred
compensation
  Common
stock
  Additional
paid-in
capital
  Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
  Unrealized
derivative
gains
(losses)
  Minimum
retirement
benefit
liability
adjustments
  Total
accumulated
other
comprehensive
(loss) earnings
  Deferred
compensation
  Retained
earnings
  Treasury
stock

at cost
  Treasury
stock held for
deferred
compensation
  Noncontrolling
interest in
consolidated
subsidiary
  Total
stockholders’
equity
 

Balances as of October 1, 2009

  —      72,960    (4,621  (389  $106   $73,197   $29,464   $(801 $(18,534 $10,129   $4,904   $741,505   $(115,478 $(4,904 $2,056   $711,515  

Net earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      110,844    —      —      318    111,162  

Cash dividends paid

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (16,430  —      —      (655  (17,085

Purchases of treasury stock

  —      —      (307  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (8,703  —      —      (8,703

Sale of treasury stock

  —      —      702    —      —      (4,929  —      —      —      —      —      —      11,049    —      —      6,120  

Purchases of noncontrolling interest

  —      —      —      —      —      (6,180  (116  —      —      (116  —      —      —      —      (1,824  (8,120

Tax benefit attributable to exercise of stock options

  —      —      —      —      —      5,115    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      5,115  

Stock-based compensation

  —      —      —      —      —      6,686    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      6,686  

Purchase of stock by deferred compensation plan

  —      —      3    (3  —      26    —      —      —      —      169    —      44    (169  —      70  

Distribution of stock from deferred compensation plan

  —      —      —      36    —      —      —      —      —      —      (185  —      —      185    —      —    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  —      —      —      —      —      —      (8,602  —      —      (8,602  —      —      —      —      163    (8,439

Reclassification of unrecognized derivative losses to earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      282    —      282    —      —      —      —      —      282  

Minimum retirement benefits liability adjustments

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      4,409    4,409    —      —      —      —      —      4,409  

Taxes on changes in accumulated other comprehensive earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      2,406    (108  (2,058  240    —      —      —      —      (58  182  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of September 30, 2010

  —      72,960    (4,223  (356  106    73,915    23,152    (627  (16,183  6,342    4,888    835,919    (113,088  (4,888  —      803,194  

Net earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      132,235    —      —      —      132,235  

Cash dividends paid

  —      —      —      —      —      —       —      —      —      —      (18,581  —      —      —      (18,581

Purchases of treasury stock

  —      —      (301  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (9,700  —      —      (9,700

Sales of treasury stock

  —      —      452    —      —      (2,643  —      —      —      —      —      —      7,127    —      —      4,484  

Tax benefit attributable to exercise of stock options

  —      —      —      —      —      3,558    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      3,558  

Stock-based compensation

  —      —      —      —      —      6,590    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      6,590  

Purchases of stock by deferred compensation plan

  —      —      2    (5  —      33    —      —      —      —      149    —      —      (149  —      33  

Distribution of stock from deferred compensation plan

  —      —      —      46    —      —      —      —      —      —      (456  —      —      456    —      —    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  —      —      —      —      —      —      (2,653  —      —      (2,653  —      —      —      —      —      (2,653

Reclassification of unrecognized derivative losses to earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      229    —      229    —      —      —      —      —      229  

Minimum retirement benefits liability adjustments

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (2,930  (2,930  —      —      —      —      —      (2,930

Taxes on changes in accumulated other comprehensive earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      1,604    (86  1,120    2,638    —      —      —      —      —      2,638  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of September 30, 2011

  —      72,960    (4,070  (315  106    81,453    22,103    (484  (17,993  3,626    4,581    949,573    (115,661  (4,581  —      919,097  

Net earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      141,589    —      —      —      141,589  

Cash dividends paid

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (21,351  —      —      —      (21,351

Purchases of treasury stock

  —      —      (1,132  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (44,110  —      —      (44,110

Sales of treasury stock

  —      —      454    —      —      (1,542  —      —      —      —      —      —      7,720    —      —      6,178  

Common shares issued from treasury stock for benefit plans

  —      —      209    —      —      5,238    —      —      —      —      —      —      4,097    —      —      9,335  

Tax benefit attributable to exercise of stock options

  —      —      —      —      —      3,990    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      3,990  

Stock-based compensation

  —      —      —      —      —      8,628    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      8,628  

Purchases of stock by deferred compensation plan

  —      —      3    (5  —      59    —      —      —      —      201    —      49    (201  —      108  

Distribution of stock from deferred compensation plan

  —      —      —      44    —      —      —      —      —      —      (438  —      —      438    —      —    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  —      —      —      —      —      —      (7,291  —      —      (7,291  —      —      —      —      —      (7,291

Reclassification of unrecognized derivative losses to earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      174    —      174    —      —      —      —      —      174  

Minimum retirement benefits liability adjustments

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      (17,279  (17,279  —      —      —      —      —      (17,279

Taxes on changes in accumulated other comprehensive earnings

  —      —      —      —      —      —      2,635    (66  6,478    9,047    —      —      —      —      —      9,047  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of September 30, 2012

  —      72,960    (4,536  (276 $106   $97,826   $17,447   $(376 $(28,794 $(11,723 $4,344   $1,069,811   $(147,905 $(4,344 $—     $1,008,115  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 1.  Operations and summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of Woodward, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “Woodward” or “the Company”).  Dollar amounts contained in these Consolidated Financial Statements are in thousands, except per share amounts.

Nature of operations

Woodward enhances the global quality of life and sustainability by optimizing energy use through improved efficiency and lower emissions.  Woodward is an independent designer, manufacturer, and service provider of energy control and optimization solutions.  Woodward designs, produces and services reliable, efficient, low-emission, and high-performance energy control products for diverse applications in challenging environments.  Woodward has significant production and assembly facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia, and promotes its products and services through its worldwide locations.

Woodward’s strategic focus is providing energy control and optimization solutions for the aerospace and energy markets.  The precise and efficient control of energy, including fluid and electrical energy, combustion, and motion, is a growing requirement in the markets it serves.  Woodward’s customers look to it to optimize the efficiency, emissions and operation of power equipment in both commercial and militarydefense operations.  Woodward’s core technologies leverage well across its markets and customer applications, enabling it to develop and integrate cost-effective and state-of-the-art fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation and electronic systems.  Woodward focuses its solutions and services primarily on serving original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and equipment packagers, partnering with them to bring superior component and system solutions to their demanding applications.  Woodward also provides aftermarket repair, replacement and other service support for its installed products.

Woodward’s components and integrated systems optimize performance of commercial aircraft, militarydefense aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment, gas and steam turbines, wind turbines, including converters and power grid related equipment, industrial diesel, gas, alternative and alternativedual fuel reciprocating engines, and electrical power systems.  Woodward’s innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help its customers offer more cost-effective, cleaner, and more reliable equipment.  Woodward’s customers include leading OEMs and the end users of their products.

Summary of significant accounting policies

Principles of consolidation:  These Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the accounts of Woodward and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries.  Transactions within and between these companies are eliminated.

Use of estimates:  The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period, and certain financial statement disclosures.  Significant estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts, net realizable value of inventories, percent complete on long-term contracts, cost of sales incentives, useful lives of property and identifiable intangible assets, the evaluation of impairments of property, identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, the provision for income tax and related valuation reserves, the valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, assumptions used in the determination of the funded status and annual expense of pension and postretirement employee benefit plans, the valuation of stock compensation instruments granted to employees, and contingencies. Actual results could vary materially from Woodward’s estimates.

Foreign currency exchange rates:  The assets and liabilities of substantially all subsidiaries outside the United States are translated at fiscal year-end rates of exchange, and earnings and cash flow statements are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange.  Translation adjustments are accumulated with other comprehensive (loss) earnings as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and are presented net of tax effects in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’

61


Equity.  The effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on loans between consolidated subsidiaries, that are considered permanent in nature, are also accumulated with other comprehensive earnings, net of tax.

The Company is exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates because some sales transactions, and certain of the assets and liabilities of its domestic and foreign subsidiaries, are denominated in foreign currencies.  Selling, general, and administrative expenses include net foreign currency losses of $2,738 in fiscal year 2013 and $480 in fiscal year 2012, and gains of $575 in fiscal year 2011 and $425 in fiscal year 2010.

2011.

Revenue recognition:  Woodward recognizes revenue upon shipment or delivery of products or services and when collectability is reasonably assured.  Delivery is upon completion of manufacturing, customer acceptance, and the transfer of the risks and rewards of ownership.  In countries whose laws provide for retention of some form of title by sellers, enabling recovery of goods in the event of customer default on payment, product delivery is considered to have occurred when the customer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the products.

Occasionally, Woodward transfers title of product to customers, but retains substantive performance obligations such as completion of product testing, customer acceptance or in some instances regulatory acceptance.  Revenue is deferred until the performance obligations are satisfied.  In addition, service revenue, which accounts for less than 10%1% of Woodward’s net sales, is also recognized upon completion of applicable performance obligations.

Certain Woodward products include incidental software or firmware essential to the performance of the product as designed, which are treated as units of accounting associated with the related tangible product with which the software is included.  Woodward does not sell software on a standalone basis, although software upgrades, if any, are generally paid for by the customer.

Product freight costs are included in cost of goods sold.  Freight costs charged to customers are included in net sales.

Taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities are excluded from revenue and are recorded as liabilities until the taxes are remitted to the appropriate U.S. or foreign government authority.

Customer payments:  Woodward occasionally agrees to make payments to certain customers in order to participate in anticipated sales activity.  Payments made to customers are accounted for as a reduction of revenue unless they are made in exchange for identifiable goods or services with fair values that can be reasonably estimated.  Reductions in revenue associated with these customer payments are recognized immediately to the extent that the payments cannot be attributed to anticipated future sales, and are recognized in future periods to the extent that the payments relate to anticipated future sales.  Such determinations are based on the facts and circumstances underlying each payment.

Stock-based compensation:  Compensation cost relating to stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors is recognized in the financial statements using a fair value method.  Non-qualified stock option awards and restricted stock awards are issued under Woodward’s stock-based compensation plans.  The cost of such awards, measured at the grant date, is based on the estimated fair value of the award.

Forfeitures are estimated at the time of each grant in order to estimate the portion of the award that will ultimately vest.  The estimate is based on Woodward’s historical rates of forfeitures and is updated periodically.  The portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods, which is generally the vesting period of the awards.

Research and development costs:  Company funded expenditures related to new product development activities are expensed as incurred and are separately reported in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Income taxes:  Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of Woodward’s assets, liabilities, and certain unrecognized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive earnings.  Woodward provides for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United States, except for those earnings that it considers to be permanently reinvested.indefinitely invested.

Cash equivalents:  Highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with multiple financial institutions.  Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are maintained with financial institutions with reputable credit and therefore bear minimal credit risk.  Woodward holds cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions in excess of amounts covered by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and sometimes invests excess cash in money market funds not insured by the FDIC.

Accounts receivable:  Almost all Woodward’s sales are made on credit and result in accounts receivable, which are recorded at the amount invoiced.  In the normal course of business, not all accounts receivable are collected and, therefore, an

62


allowance for losses of accounts receivable is provided equal to the amount that Woodward believes ultimately will not be collected.  Customer-specific information is considered related to delinquent accounts, past loss experience, bankruptcy filings, deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position, and current economic conditions in establishing the amount of its allowance.  Accounts receivable losses are deducted from the allowance and the related accounts receivable balances are written off when the receivables are deemed uncollectible.  Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recognized when received.

Consistent with business practice common in China, Woodward’s Chinese subsidiary has accepted in settlement of certain customer accounts receivable from Chinese customers’ bank drafts authorized by large, creditworthy Chinese banks.  These bank drafts represent a promise to pay the balance of the receivable at a future date, albeit under payment terms that can be longer than traditional payment terms.  At September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, Woodward had bank drafts of $72,954 and $40,312, respectively, recorded as accounts receivable on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Woodward only accepts bank drafts authorized by large, creditworthy banks as to which the credit risk associated with the bank draft is assessed to be minimal.

Inventories:  Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using methods that approximate a first-in, first-out basis.

Component parts include items that can be sold separately as finished goods or included in the manufacture of other products.

Customer deposits are recorded against inventory when the right of offset exists.  CustomerThere were no customer deposits of $0 and $3,728 were included in inventory as of September 30, 20122013 and 2011, respectively.2012.  All other customer deposits are recorded in accrued liabilities.

Property, plant, and equipment:Property, plant, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Assets are generally depreciated using the straight-line method.  Certain buildings and improvements are depreciated using the declining-balance method.  Assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.

Estimated lives over which fixed assets are generally depreciated at September 30, 20122013 were as follows:

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land improvements

 

5

-

40

 

years

Buildings and improvements

 

5

-

40

 

years

Leasehold improvements

 

1

-

40

 

years

Machinery and production equipment

 

3

-

15

 

years

Computer equipment and software

 

2

-

10

 

years

Office furniture and equipment

 

2

-

15

 

years

Other

 

1

-

13

 

years

2-40years

Leasehold improvements

1-10years

Machinery and production equipment

2-15years

Computer equipment and software

3-10years

Office furniture and equipment

3-15years

Other

3-10years

Included in computer equipment and software are Woodward’s enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) systems, which have an estimated useful life of 10 years.  All other computer equipment and software is generally depreciated over three to five years.

Purchase accounting:Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.  Under the purchase method, assets and liabilities, including intangible assets, are recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date.  Acquisition costs in excess of amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded as goodwill.

Goodwill:    Woodward tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level or aggregated reporting unit level if aggregation is appropriate based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, on an annual basis and more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or aggregated reporting unit below its carrying amount.  Based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, Woodward sometimes aggregates components of a single operating segment into a reporting unit, if appropriate.   The impairment tests consist of comparing the implied fair value of each reporting unit or aggregated reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill.  If the carrying amount of the reporting unit or aggregated reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value, Woodward compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the recorded carrying amount of goodwill.  If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its implied fair value.  There was no impairment charge recorded in fiscal years 2013, 2012, 2011, or 2010.2011.

Other intangibles:  Other intangibles are recognized apart from goodwill whenever an acquired intangible asset arises from contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it is capable of being separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related contract, asset, or

63


liability.  All of Woodward’s intangibles have an estimated useful life and are being amortized using patterns that reflect the periods over which the economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized.  Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible is both not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.

Estimated lives over which intangible assets are amortized at September 30, 20122013 were as follows:

 

Customer relationships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

9

-

30

 

years

Intellectual property

 

10

-

17

 

years

Process technology

 

8

-

30

 

years

Other

 

3

-

15

 

years

9-30years ��

Intellectual property

10-17years

Process technology

8-30years

Other

3-15years

Impairment of long-lived assets:  Woodward reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets or asset groups to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable.  Factors that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of the asset, or a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, among others.  If such facts indicate a potential impairment, the Company would assess the recoverability of an asset group by determining if the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets over the remaining economic life of the primary asset in the asset group.  If the recoverability test indicates that the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the Company will estimate the fair value of the asset group using appropriate valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate of discounted cash flows.  Any impairment would be measured as the difference between the asset groups carrying amount and its estimated fair value.  There was no impairment charge recorded in fiscal yearyears 2013, 2012 fiscal year 2011, or fiscal year 2010.2011.

Investment in marketable equity securities:Woodward holds marketable equity securities related to its deferred compensation program.  Based on Woodward’s intentions regarding these instruments, marketable equity securities are classified as trading securities.  The trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized gains and losses recognized in earnings.“Other (income) expense, net.” The trading securities are included in “Other current assets.”  The associated obligation to provide benefits is included in “Other liabilities.”

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries:  Investments in and operating results of entities in which Woodward does not have a controlling financial interest or the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations are included in the financial statements using the cost method of accounting.  Investments and operating results of entities in which Woodward does not have a controlling interest but does have the ability to exercise significant influence over operations are included in the financial statements using the equity method of accounting.

Non-controlling interests: Non-controlling financial interests are accounted for as a separate component of equity, and all transactions between the Company and the non-controlling interest are accounted for as equity transactions.

In April 2010, the Company purchased the remaining 26% non-controlling interest in Woodward India Private Limited, a Woodward consolidated subsidiary, for $8,120. As a result of this transaction, Woodward now owns 100% of Woodward India Private Limited and there are no other non-controlling interests in Woodward’s consolidated subsidiaries.

The following is a summary of the effects of Woodward’s purchase of the remaining 26% non-controlling interest in Woodward India Private Limited on Woodward’s stockholders’ equity:

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

  $141,589    $132,235    $110,844  

Decrease in Woodward's additional paid-in capital related to purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —       —       (6,180
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change from net earnings attributable to Woodward and transfers to noncontrolling interest

  $141,589    $132,235    $104,664  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred compensation:The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan, or “rabbi trust”trust,” as part of its overall compensation package for certain employees.

Deferred compensation obligations will be settled either by delivery of a fixed number of shares of Woodward’s common stock (in accordance with certain eligible members’ irrevocable elections) or in cash.  Woodward has contributed shares of its common stock into a trust established for the future settlement of deferred compensation obligations that are payable in shares of Woodward’s common stock.  Common stock held by the trust is reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetsSheet as “Treasury stock held for deferred compensation” and the related deferred compensation obligation is reflected as a separate component of equity in amounts equal to the fair value of the common stock at the dates of contribution.  These accounts are not adjusted for subsequent changes in the fair value of the common stock.  Deferred compensation obligations that will be settled in cash are accounted for on an accrual basis in accordance with the terms of the underlying contract and are reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetsSheet as “Other liabilities.”

Derivatives:  The Company is exposed to various market risks that arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business.  The Company has historically utilized derivative instruments, such as treasury lock agreements to lock in fixed rates on future debt issuances, which qualify as cash flow or fair value hedges to mitigate the risk of variability in cash flows related to future interest payments attributable to changes in the designated benchmark rate.  The Company records all such interest rate hedge instruments on the balance sheet at fair value.  Cash flows related to the instrument designated as a qualifying hedge are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the same categories as the cash flows from the items being hedged.  Accordingly, cash flows relating to the settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging the forecasted future interest payments on debt have been reflected upon settlement as a component of financing

64


cash flows.  The resulting gain or loss from such settlement is deferred to other comprehensive income and reclassified to interest expense over the term of the underlying debt.  This reclassification of the deferred gains and losses impacts the interest expense recognized on the underlying debt that was hedged and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows in periods subsequent to settlement.  The periodic settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging outstanding variable rate debt is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows.

From time to time, Woodward will enter into foreign currency exchange rate contracts to hedge against changes in foreign currency exchange rates on liabilities expected to be settled at a future date.  Woodward has historically not designated these transactions as accounting hedges.  The fair value of foreign currency exchange rate contracts held at the end of the period are recognized in the balance sheet and the unrealized gains or losses are recorded to “Other (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.  Upon settlement of foreign currency exchange rate contracts, any unrealized gains or losses previously recognized are reversed and the realized gain or loss is recorded to “Other (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.  Further information on foreign currency exchange rate contracts can be found at Note 6,Derivative instruments and hedging activities.

Financial instruments:  The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, investments in the deferred compensation program and debt.  Because of their short-term maturity, the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and short-term debt approximate fair value.  The fair value of investments in the deferred compensation program and short-term debt approximateare adjusted to fair value.value based on the quoted market prices for the investments in the various mutual funds owned.    The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on a model that discounts future principal and interest payments at interest rates available to the Company at the end of the period for similar debt with the same maturity.  Further information on the fair value of financial instruments can be found at Note 5,Financial instruments and fair value measurements.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into the following levels:

Level 1: Inputs based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2: Quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable and can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Inputs reflect management’s best estimates and assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation of the instruments.

Postretirement benefits:  The Company provides various benefits to certain current and former employees through defined benefit pension and postretirement plans.  For financial reporting purposes, net periodic benefits expense and related obligations are calculated using a number of significant actuarial assumptions.  Changes in net periodic expense and funding status may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions.  The funded status of defined pension and postretirement plans recognized in the statement of financial position is measured as the difference between the fair market value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation.  For a defined benefit pension plan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; for any other defined benefit postretirement plan, such as a retiree health care plan, the benefit obligation is the accumulated benefit obligation.  Any over-funded status is recognized as an asset and any underfunded status is recognized as a liability.

Projected benefit obligation is the actuarial present value as of the measurement date of all benefits attributed by the plan benefit formula to employee service rendered before the measurement date using assumptions as to future compensation levels if the plan benefit formula is based on those future compensation levels.  Accumulated benefit obligation is the actuarial present value of benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed by the plan benefit formula to employee service rendered before the measurement date and based on employee service and compensation, if applicable, prior to that date.  Accumulated benefit obligation differs from projected benefit obligation in that it includes no assumption about future compensation levels.

Note 2.  New accounting standards

From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standards setting bodies issue new accounting pronouncements.  Updates to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”). Unless otherwise discussed, Woodward believes that

65


In February 2013, the impactFASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Reporting of recently issued guidance, whether adoptedAmounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”  ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements; however, the amendments require companies to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated comprehensive income by component.  ASU 2013-02 requires a company to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated comprehensive income by respective line items of net income, but only if the amount so reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be adoptedreclassified to net income in its entirety in the future,same reporting period.  For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, a company is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts.  ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 (fiscal year 2014 for Woodward).  As the requirements of ASU 2013-02 are disclosure related only, it is not expected to have a material impact on theWoodward’s Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.Statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment.”  ASU 2011-08 allows companies to perform a “qualitative” assessment to determine whether or not the current two-step quantitative testing method, in which a company compares the fair value of reporting units to its carrying amount including goodwill, must be followed.  If a qualitative assessment indicates that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, then the quantitative impairment test is not required.  A company may choose to use the qualitative assessment on none, some, or all if its reporting units or to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the two- steptwo-step quantitative testing method.  ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011; however, early adoption is permitted.2011 (fiscal year 2013 for Woodward).  The adoption of ASU 2011-08 isdid not expected to have a material impact on Woodward’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 3.  Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period.

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward reflects the weighted-average number of shares outstanding after consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options.

The following is a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to Woodward to basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward and diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward:share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings 

 

$

145,942 

 

$

141,589 

 

$

132,235 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic shares outstanding

 

 

68,392 

 

 

68,880 

 

 

68,797 

Dilutive effect of stock options

 

 

1,210 

 

 

1,427 

 

 

1,343 

Diluted shares outstanding

 

 

69,602 

 

 

70,307 

 

 

70,140 

Income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

2.13 

 

$

2.06 

 

$

1.92 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

2.10 

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.89 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Numerator:

      

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

  $141,589    $132,235    $110,844  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator:

      

Basic shares outstanding

   68,880     68,797     68,472  

Dilutive effect of stock options

   1,427     1,343     1,392  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted shares outstanding

   70,307     70,140     69,864  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income per common share:

      

Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward

  $2.06    $1.92    $1.62  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward

  $2.01    $1.89    $1.59  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following stock option grants were outstanding during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, but were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Options

 

 

44 

 

 

50 

 

 

684 

Weighted-average option price

 

$

40.21 

 

$

36.33 

 

$

32.04 

66

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Options

   50     684     1,106  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average option price

  $36.33    $32.04    $26.94  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share included the weighted-average treasury stock shares held for deferred compensation obligations of the following:

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Weighted-average treasury stock shares held for deferred compensation obligation

   295     335     371  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Weighted-average treasury stock shares held for deferred compensation obligations

 

 

256 

 

 

295 

 

 

335 

Note 4.  Business acquisitions

Woodward has recorded the acquisitionacquisitions described below using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, has included the results of operations of the acquired businesses in its consolidated results as of the date of acquisition.In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance for business combinations, the respective purchase priceprices for this acquisition isthese acquisitions are allocated to the tangible assets, liabilities, and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.  The excess purchase price over the respective fair values of assets is recorded as goodwill.  Goodwill is not amortized under U.S. GAAP but is tested for impairment at least annually (See Note 10,Goodwill)

Duarte Business Acquisition

On December 27, 2012, Woodward entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with GE Aviation Systems LLC (the “Seller”) and General Electric Company for the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities related to the Seller’s thrust reverser actuation systems business located in Duarte, California (the “Duarte Business”) for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000.  The acquisition was completed on December 28, 2012 and, based on customary purchase price adjustments, Woodward paid cash at closing in the amount of $198,900.  The purchase price remains subject to certain additional customary post-closing adjustments. 

The Duarte Business develops and manufactures motion control technologies and platforms, more specifically thrust reverser actuation systems.  The Duarte Business serves customers such as Airbus, Boeing, General Electric, Safran and the U.S. Government.  Its products are used primarily on commercial aircraft such as the Boeing 737, 747 and 777, and the Airbus A320.  The Duarte Business is being integrated into Woodward’s Aerospace segment. 

The Duarte Business employs approximately 350 people, of which approximately 65% are union employees.  The collective bargaining agreements with Woodward’s union employees are generally renewed through contract renegotiations prior to the contract expiration date.  The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Local No. 509 (the “Duarte Union”) contract, which covers the unionized Duarte Business employees, was to expire on May 25, 2013.  During the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, a new collective bargaining agreement was negotiated, which will expire on June 3, 2017.

The Company believes the Duarte Business provides it with expanded motion control technologies and platforms, and that there will be operating synergies and significant opportunities to share technologies and leverage the customer base.  Goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business, which is deductible for income tax purposes, represents the estimated value of such future opportunities, the value of potential expansion with new customers, the opportunity to further develop sales opportunities with new and acquired Duarte Business customers, and other synergies expected to be achieved through the integration of the Duarte Business into Woodward’s Aerospace segment.

The preliminary purchase price of the Duarte Business is as follows:

Cash paid to Seller

$

198,900 

Less cash acquired

(40)

Total preliminary purchase price

$

198,860 

67


The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations.”  Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction were recorded at their estimated acquisition date fair values, while transaction costs associated with the acquisition were expensed as incurred.  Woodward’s preliminary allocation was based on an evaluation of the appropriate fair values and represents management’s best estimate based on available data.

Woodward is currently working with the Seller to finalize purchase price adjustments customary to these types of transactions and, therefore, has not finalized the valuations of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Changes to the valuations of the assets and liabilities acquired resulted in insignificant changes to Woodward’s previously reported earnings and therefore prior quarters have not been restated.  

The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition of the Duarte Business:

Accounts receivable

$

14,245 

Inventories

30,149 

Other current assets

10,370 

Property, plant, and equipment

11,804 

Goodwill

88,477 

Intangible assets

86,700 

Other noncurrent assets

18,097 

Total assets acquired

259,842 

Other current liabilities

29,676 

Other noncurrent liabilities

31,306 

Total liabilities assumed

60,982 

Net assets acquired

$

198,860 

Assumed liabilities include $4,758 and $17,939 of current and long-term performance obligations, respectively, for contractual commitments that are expected to result in future economic losses. 

The Asset Purchase Agreement included commitments for the Duarte Business to continue to provide services to the Seller unrelated to the core business acquired, for which Woodward will be paid by the Seller. Assumed liabilities include $12,985 and $13,215 of current and long-term performance obligations, respectively, for services to be provided to the Seller, offset by $8,103 and $18,097 of current and long-term assets, respectively, related to contractual payments due from the Seller.

In connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business, Woodward did not assume the postretirement benefit obligations of the Duarte Business’ defined benefit pension plan.  Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Woodward was obligated to establish a new defined benefit pension plan for the Duarte Business employees who were beneficiaries of the Seller’s defined benefit pension plan.  Woodward completed the establishment of the new defined benefit pension plan during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.  Woodward’s new defined benefit pension plan provides for similar benefits as those provided by the Seller.  For more information about the new defined benefit pension plan for the Duarte Business, see Note 18, Retirement benefits

A summary of the estimated intangible assets acquired, weighted-average useful lives, and amortization methods follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Amounts

 

Weighted-Average Useful Life

 

Amortization Method

Customer relationships and contracts

$

74,000 

 

20 

years

 

Straight-line

Process technology

 

5,000 

 

25 

years

 

Straight-line

Backlog

 

7,700 

 

years

 

Accelerated

   Total

$

86,700 

 

 

 

 

 

68


Future amortization expense associated with the acquired intangibles is expected to be:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30:

 

 

2014

$

5,944 

2015

 

4,382 

2016

 

4,047 

2017

 

4,047 

2018

 

4,047 

Thereafter

 

57,715 

 

$

80,182 

Net sales for the Duarte Business subsequent to the date it was acquired by Woodward were $111,261 for fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.  Earnings of the Duarte Business subsequent to the date it was acquired by Woodward for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 were slightly accretive to the consolidated net earnings of Woodward.

Pro forma results for Woodward giving effect to the acquisition of the Duarte Business

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of Woodward and the Duarte Business as if the acquisition had occurred as of October 1, 2011, the beginning of fiscal year 2012.  The pro forma information is presented for information purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition and the borrowings used to finance it had taken place at the beginning of fiscal year 2012.  The pro forma information combines the historical results of Woodward with the historical results of the Duarte Business for that period.

Prior to the acquisition of the Duarte Business,  the Duarte Business was a wholly owned business of the Seller, and as such was not a stand-alone entity for financial reporting purposes.  Accordingly, the historical operating results of the Duarte Business may not be indicative of the results that might have been achieved, historically or in the future, if the Duarte Business had been a stand-alone entity.  The unaudited pro forma results for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 include amortization charges for acquired intangible assets, eliminations of intercompany transactions, adjustments for depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment, adjustments for acquired performance obligations, transaction costs incurred, adjustments to interest expense, and related tax effects.

The unaudited pro forma results for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, compared to the actual results reported in these Consolidated Financial Statements, follow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 2013

 

Year Ended September 30, 2012

 

As reported

 

Pro forma

 

As reported

 

Pro forma

Net sales

$

1,935,976 

 

$

1,966,376 

 

$

1,865,627 

 

$

1,978,169 

Net earnings

 

145,942 

 

 

152,271 

 

 

141,589 

 

 

131,412 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

$

2.13 

 

$

2.23 

 

$

2.06 

 

$

1.91 

Diluted earnings per share

 

2.10 

 

 

2.19 

 

 

2.01 

 

 

1.87 

69


These pro forma results do not reflect the favorable impact of various long-term agreements with customers of the Duarte Business that were renegotiated by the Seller prior to the acquisition and effective on or before January 1, 2013.  Collectively, the renegotiation of the agreements would have had a significant positive impact on prior operating results of the Duarte Business if implemented earlier.

The Company incurred transaction costs of $1,944 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, which are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

IDS Acquisition

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding stock of Integral Drive Systems AG and its European companies, including their respective holding companies (“IDS”), and the assets of IDS’s business in China (together the “IDS Acquisition”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $48,412 paid to the sellers.

IDS is a developer and manufacturer of innovative power electronic systems predominantly in utility scale wind turbines and photovoltaic power plants.  IDS also offers key products for power distribution and marine propulsion systems.  In addition to wind turbines and photovoltaic plants, its products are used in offshore oil and gas platforms, energy storage and distribution systems, and a variety of industrial applications.  IDS has been integrated into Woodward’s Energy segment.

The Company believes the IDS Acquisition expands its presence in wind converter offerings and reduces its time to market with expansion of solar energy, energy storage, and marine drives. Goodwill recorded in connection with the IDS Acquisition, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, represents the estimated value of such future opportunities, the value of potential expansion with new customers, the opportunity to further develop sales opportunities with new and acquired IDS customers, and anticipated synergies expected to be achieved through the integration of IDS into Woodward’s Energy segment.

As of September 30, 2012, $7,511 paid in connection with the IDS Acquisition was deposited into escrow accounts to secure Woodward’s ability to recover any amounts owed to Woodward by the sellers as a result of customary indemnities related to representations and warranties made by the sellers. In October 2012, Woodward and the primary seller agreed to a settlement of their respective claims and counterclaims, and approximately $6,400 was released from one of the escrow accounts, of which the primary seller agreed to pay approximately $3,700 to Woodward, with the balance of such escrow account returned to the primary seller. The remaining funds held in the other escrow accounts will only be released to the sellers or returned to Woodward as specified in the related purchase agreements.

The purchase price of the IDS Acquisition is as follows:

Cash paid to sellers

  $ 48,412  

Less cash acquired

   (1,251
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

   47,161  

Less marketable securities acquired

   (8,463
  

 

 

 

Price paid for business assets

  $38,698  
  

 

 

 

Cash paid to sellers

$

48,412 

Less cash acquired

(1,251)

Total purchase price

47,161 

Less marketable securities acquired

(8,463)

Price paid for business assets

$

38,698 

The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was finalized as of March 31, 2012. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction were recorded at their acquisition date fair values, while transaction costs associated with the acquisition were expensed as incurred.  The Company’sWoodward’s allocation was based on an evaluation of the appropriate fair values and represents management’s best estimate based on available data.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the IDS Acquisition:

Current assets

$

14,627 

Investments in marketable securities

8,463 

Property, plant, and equipment

1,954 

Goodwill

24,188 

Intangible assets

11,882 

Total assets acquired

61,114 

Other current liabilities

5,505 

Warranty accrual

2,250 

Postretirement benefits

434 

Deferred tax liabilities

2,472 

Other tax - noncurrent

3,292 

Total liabilities assumed

13,953 

Net assets acquired

$

47,161 

70

 

Current assets

  $14,627  

Investments in marketable securities

   8,463  

Property, plant, and equipment

   1,954  

Goodwill .

   24,188  

Intangible assets

   11,882  
  

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

   61,114  
  

 

 

 

Other current liabilities

   5,505  

Warranty accrual

   2,250  

Postretirement benefits

   434  

Deferred tax liabilities

   2,472  

Other tax—noncurrent

   3,292  
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed

   13,953  
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $47,161  
  

 

 

 

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, there were no changes to the initial valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the IDS Acquisition.  The fair value of warranty liabilities assumed represents the estimated costs to provide service for contractual warranty obligations on products sold by IDS and IDS’s business in China prior to the IDS Acquisition.  The fair value of “Other tax – noncurrent” represents the estimated value of gross unrecognized tax benefits assumed.

In connection with the IDS Acquisition, Woodward acquired various marketable securities, which are not classified as cash equivalents under U.S. GAAP.  These marketable securities were sold during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 and reinvested into cash and cash equivalents consistent with Woodward’s internal investment and risk management policies.  Losses on the sale of marketable securities were included in “Other (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the year ended September 30, 2011.

Also, in connection with the IDS Acquisition, Woodward assumed the net postretirement benefit obligations of several Swiss statutory retirement plans which are considered to be defined benefit plans under U.S. GAAP.

A summary of the intangible assets acquired, weighted-average useful lives and amortization methods follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Weighted-   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Average Useful  Amortization

Estimated Amounts

 

Weighted-Average Useful Life

 

Amortization Method

  Amount   Life  Method

Customer relationships

  $3,452    9 years  Straight-line

Customer relationships and contracts

$

3,452 

 

years

 

Straight-line

Process technology

   7,752    8.5 years  Straight-line

 

7,752 

 

8.5 

years

 

Straight-line

Other

   678    2.5 years  Straight-line
  

 

     

Backlog

 

678 

 

2.5 

years

 

Straight-line

Total

  $11,882    8 years  

$

11,882 

 

years

 

 

  

 

     

The operating results of the IDS Acquisition are included in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings as of April 15, 2011.  Pro forma financial disclosures havewere not been presented as the IDS Acquisition was not significant to Woodward’s financial position or results of operations.  The CompanyWoodward incurred IDS Acquisition related transaction costs of $2,396 during the year ended September 30, 2011, which were included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.  No additional IDS Acquisition related transaction costs were incurred in the yearyears ended September 30, 2013 or September 30, 2012.

Note 5.  Financial instruments and fair value measurements

The estimated fair values of Woodward’s financial instruments were as follows:

  At September 30, 2012  At September 30, 2011 
  Estimated Fair     Estimated Fair    
  Value  Carrying Cost  Value  Carrying Cost 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $61,829   $61,829   $74,539   $74,539  

Investments in deferred compensation program

  7,316    7,316    5,855    5,855  

Short-term borrowings

  (329  (329  —      —    

Long-term debt, including current portion

  (443,827  (391,875  (482,776  (425,246

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, which include investments in money market funds and reverse repurchase agreements for the overnight investment of excess cash in U.S. Government and government agency obligations, are assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts. Cash and cash equivalents have short-term maturities and market interest rates. Woodward’s cash and cash equivalents include funds deposited or invested in the United States and overseas that are not insured by the FDIC. Woodward believes that its deposited and invested funds are held by or invested with creditworthy financial institutions or counterparties.

Investments related to the deferred compensation program used to provide deferred compensation benefits to certain employees are carried at market value.

The fair values of short-term borrowings at variable interest rates are assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts because such borrowings are expected to be repaid or settled for their carrying amounts within a short period of time.

The fair value of long-term debt was estimated based on a model that discounted future principal and interest payments at interest rates available to the Company at the end of the period for similar debt of the same maturity, which is a level 2 input as defined by the U.S. GAAP fair value hierarchy. The weighted-average interest rates used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt were as follows:

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2012  2011 

Weighted-average interest rate used to estimate fair value

  2.1  2.6

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP.

The table below presents information about Woodward’s financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques Woodward utilized to determine such fair value.  Woodward had no financial liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 20122013 or September 30, 2011.2012.

 

   At September 30, 2012   At September 30, 2011 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

Financial assets:

                

Cash

  $32,688    $—      $—      $32,688    $63,716    $—      $—      $63,716  

Investments in money market funds

   29,141     —       —       29,141     10,823     —       —       10,823  

Equity securities

   7,316     —       —       7,316     5,855     —       —       5,855  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total financial assets

  $69,145    $—      $—      $69,145    $80,394    $—      $—      $80,394  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2013

 

At September 30, 2012

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

35,839 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

35,839 

 

$

32,688 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

32,688 

Investments in money market funds

 

 

2,950 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

2,950 

 

 

14,791 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

14,791 

Investments in reverse repurchase agreements

 

 

9,767 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

9,767 

 

 

14,350 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

14,350 

Equity securities

 

 

8,285 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

8,285 

 

 

7,316 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

7,316 

Total financial assets

 

$

56,841 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

56,841 

 

$

69,145 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

69,145 

71


Investments in money market funds: Woodward sometimes invests excess cash in money market funds not insured by the FDIC.  Woodward believes that the investments in money market funds are on deposit with creditworthy financial institutions and that the funds are highly liquid.  The investments in money market funds are reported at fair value, with realized gains from interest income realized in earnings and are included in “Cash and cash equivalents.”  The fair values of Woodward’s investments in money market funds are based on the quoted market prices for the net asset value of the various money market funds.

Investments in reverse repurchase agreements:  Woodward sometimes invests excess cash in reverse repurchase agreements.  Under the terms of Woodward’s reverse repurchase agreements, Woodward purchases an interest in a pool of securities and is granted a security interest in those securities by the counterparty to the reverse repurchase agreement.  At an agreed upon date, generally the next business day, the counterparty repurchases Woodward’s interest in the pool of securities at a price equal to what Woodward paid to the counterparty plus a rate of return determined daily per the terms of the reverse repurchase agreement.  Woodward believes that the investments in these reverse repurchase agreements are with creditworthy financial institutions and that the funds invested are highly liquid.  The investments in reverse repurchase agreements are reported at fair value, with realized gains from interest income realized in earnings, and are included in “Cash and cash equivalents.”  Since the investments are generally overnight, the carrying value is considered to be equal to the fair value as the amount is deemed to be a cash deposit with no risk of change in value as of the end of each fiscal quarter.    

Equity securities:Woodward holds marketable equity securities, through investments in various mutual funds, related to its deferred compensation program.  Based on Woodward’s intentions regarding these instruments, marketable equity securities are classified as trading securities.  The trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized gains and losses recognized in earnings.“Other (income) expense, net.”  The trading securities are included in “Other current assets.”  The fair values of Woodward’s trading securities are based on the quoted market prices for the net asset value of the various mutual funds.

The estimated fair values and carrying costs of financial instruments that are not required to be remeasured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2013

 

At September 30, 2012

 

 

Fair Value Hierarchy Level

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

Carrying Cost

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

Carrying Cost

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes receivable from municipalities

 

2

 

 

6,718 

 

 

8,114 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

2

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(329)

 

 

(329)

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

2

 

 

(588,297)

 

 

(550,000)

 

 

(443,827)

 

 

(391,875)

In fiscal year 2013, Woodward received a long-term note from a municipality within the state of Illinois in connection with certain economic incentives related to Woodward’s development of a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area for its aerospace business.  The fair value of the long-term note was estimated based on a model that discounted future principal and interest payments received at an interest rate available to the Company at the end of the period for similarly rated municipality notes of the same maturity, which is a level 2 input as defined by the U.S. GAAP fair value hierarchy.  The interest rate used to estimate the fair value of the long-term note was 4.3% at September 30, 2013. 

In fiscal year 2013, Woodward received a long-term note from a municipality within the state of Colorado in connection with certain economic incentives related to Woodward’s development of a new campus at its corporate headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado.  The fair value of the long-term note was estimated based on a model that discounted future principal and interest payments received at an interest rate available to the Company at the end of the period for similarly rated municipality notes of the same maturity, which is a level 2 input as defined by the U.S. GAAP fair value hierarchy.  The interest rate used to estimate the fair value of the long-term note was 4.3% at September 30, 2013. 

The fair values of short-term borrowings at variable interest rates are assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts because such borrowings are expected to be repaid or settled for their carrying amounts within a short period of time.

The fair value of long-term debt was estimated based on a model that discounted future principal and interest payments at interest rates available to the Company at the end of the period for similar debt of the same maturity, which is a level 2

72


input as defined by the U.S. GAAP fair value hierarchy.  The weighted-average interest rates used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt were 2.0% and 2.1% as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

Note 6.  Derivative instruments and hedging activities

Woodward is exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, changes in certain commodity prices and fluctuations in various producer indices.  From time to time, Woodward enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including derivatives designated as accounting hedges and/or those utilized as economic hedges.  Woodward uses interest rate related derivative instruments to manage its exposure to fluctuations of interest rates.  Woodward does not enter into or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

By using derivative and/or hedging instruments to manage its risk exposure, Woodward is subject, from time to time, to credit risk and market risk on those derivative instruments.  Credit risk arises from the potential failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative and/or hedging instrument.  When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes Woodward, which creates credit risk for Woodward.  Woodward mitigates this credit risk by entering into transactions with only creditworthy counterparties.  Market risk arises from the potential adverse effects on the value of derivative and/or hedging instruments that result from a change in interest rates, commodity prices, or foreign currency exchange rates.  Woodward minimizes this market risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.

Other than the cash flow hedge discussed below, Woodward did not enter into any other derivatives or hedging transactions during the fiscal years ended September 30, 20122013 and September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, all previous derivative instruments which Woodward had entered into were settled or terminated.

2012.

Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships

In 2002, Woodward entered into certain interest rate swaps that were designated as fair value hedges of its long-term debt consisting of senior notes due in October 2011.  The discontinuance of these interest rate swaps resulted in gains that were recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the term of the associated debt (10 years) using the effective interest method.  The unrecognized portion of the gain was presented as an adjustment to long-term debt.

As of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, there was no remaining unrecognized portion of the gain as it became fully amortized during the quarter ended December 31, 2011.

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

In 2001,June 2013, in connection with Woodward’s expected refinancing of current maturities on its existing long-term debt, Woodward entered into a treasury lock agreementsagreement with a notional amount of $25,000 that were designatedqualified as a cash flow hedges of its long-term debt. hedge under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”The objective of these derivatives wasthis derivative instrument is to hedge the risk of variability in cash flows related to future interest payments of a portion of the anticipated future debt issuances attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated withover a seven-year period related to the expected issuancefuture interest payments on a portion of the senior notes due in October 2011.anticipated future debt issuances.  The discontinuance of these treasury lock agreements resultedagreement was settled in losses that wereAugust 2013 and the resulting gain of $507 was recorded as a reduction to accumulated other comprehensive earnings (“accumulated OCI”) and will be recognized as an increase ofa decrease to interest expense over the term of the associated debt (10 years) using the effective interest method. The unrecognized portion of the loss was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive earnings.

As of September 30, 2012 there was no remaining unrecognized portion of the loss as it became fully amortized during the quarter ended December 31, 2011.a seven-year period.

In September 2008, the Company entered into treasury lock agreements that qualified as cash flow hedges under authoritative guidance for derivatives and hedging.  The objective of this derivative instrument was to hedge the risk of variability in cash flows related to future interest payments of a portion of the anticipated future debt issuances attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated with the expected issuance of long-term debt to acquire Techni-Core, Inc. (“Techni-Core”) and MPC Products Corporation (“MPC Products” and, together with Techni-Core, “MPC”).  The discontinuance of these treasury lock agreements resulted in a gain that is being recognized as a reduction of interest expense over a seven-year period on the hedged Series C and D Notes, which were issued on October 1, 2008, using the effective interest method.  The unrecognized portion of the gain is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of tax.

In March 2009, Woodward entered into LIBOR lock agreements that qualified as cash flow hedges under authoritative guidance for derivatives and hedging.hedging.  The objective of this derivative instrument was to hedge the risk of variability in cash flows over a seven-year period related to future interest payments of a portion of anticipated future debt issuances attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated with the then expected issuance of long-term debt to acquire HR Textron Inc. (“HRT”).  The discontinuance of the LIBOR lock agreements resulted in a loss that is being recognized as an increase of interest expense over a seven-year period on the hedged Series E and F Notes, which were issued on April 3, 2009, using the effective interest method.method.  The unrecognized portion of the loss is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of tax.

73


Derivatives in foreign currency relationships

In September 2010, Woodward entered into a foreign currency exchange rate contract to purchase €39,000 for approximately $52,549 in early December 2010.  An unrealized gain of $579 on this derivative was carried at fair market value in “Other current assets” as of September 30, 2010.  In December 2010, a loss of $1,033 was recorded on the settlement of this forward contract and was recorded in “Other (income) expense, net.” In September 2009, Woodward entered into a foreign currency exchange rate contract to purchase €7,900 for approximately $11,662 in early October 2009. An unrealized loss of $173 on this derivative instrument was carried at fair market value in “Accrued liabilities” as of September 30, 2009. In October 2009, a loss of $71 was realized on the settlement of this forward contract and was recorded in “Other (income) expense, net.”

The objective of thesethis derivative instruments,instrument, which werewas not designated as an accounting hedges,hedge, was to limit the risk of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on certain short-term intercompany loan balances.

The following table discloses the remaining unrecognized gains and losses in Woodward’s Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with derivative instruments on Woodward’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:that were previously entered into by Woodward, which are classified in accumulated other comprehensive losses, were a net gain of $71 and a net loss of $607 as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

   At September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

  Unrecognized Gain (Loss) 

Classified in accumulated other comprehensive earnings

  $(607 $(781

Classified in current and long-term debt

   —      3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $(607 $(778
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following tables disclose the impact of derivative instruments on Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2013

Derivatives in:

 

Location of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Earnings

 

Amount of (Income) Expense Recognized in Earnings on Derivative

 

Amount of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Accumulated OCI on Derivative

 

Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Earnings

Fair value hedging relationships

 

Interest expense

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Cash flow hedging relationships

 

Interest expense

 

 

171 

 

 

(507)

 

 

171 

 

 

 

 

$

171 

 

$

(507)

 

$

171 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Year Ended September 30, 2012 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2012

Derivatives in:

  

Location of (Gain) Loss

Recognized in Earnings

  Amount of
(Income)
Expense
Recognized

in Earnings
on

Derivative
 Amount of
(Gain) Loss
Recognized
in
Accumulated
OCI on
Derivative
   Amount of
(Gain) Loss
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Earnings
 

 

Location of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Earnings

 

Amount of (Income) Expense Recognized in Earnings on Derivative

 

Amount of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Accumulated OCI on Derivative

 

Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Earnings

Fair value hedging relationships

  Interest expense  $(3 $—      $—    

 

Interest expense

 

$

(3)

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Cash flow hedging relationships

  Interest expense       174    —       174  

 

Interest expense

 

 

174 

 

 

 -

 

 

174 
    

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

$

171 

 

$

 -

 

$

174 
    $171   $—      $174  
    

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

      Year Ended September 30, 2011 

Derivatives in:

  

Location of (Gain) Loss

Recognized in Earnings

  Amount of
(Income)
Expense
Recognized
in Earnings
on
Derivative
  Amount of
(Gain) Loss
Recognized
in

Accumulated
OCI on
Derivative
   Amount of
(Gain) Loss
Reclassified
from

Accumulated
OCI into
Earnings
 

Fair value hedging relationships

  Interest expense  $(67 $—      $—    

Cash flow hedging relationships

  Interest expense   229    —       229  

Foreign currency relationships

  Other (income) expense, net   1,612    —       —    
    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $1,774   $—      $229  
    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

     Year Ended September 30, 2010 
     Amount of Amount of   Amount of 
     (Income) (Gain) Loss   (Gain) Loss 
     Expense Recognized   Reclassified 
     Recognized in   from 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     in Earnings Accumulated   Accumulated 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Location of (Gain) Loss  on OCI on   OCI into 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2011

Derivatives in:

  

Recognized in Earnings

  Derivative Derivative   Earnings 

 

Location of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Earnings

 

Amount of (Income) Expense Recognized in Earnings on Derivative

 

Amount of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Accumulated OCI on Derivative

 

Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Earnings

Fair value hedging relationships

  Interest expense  $(127 $—      $—    

 

Interest expense

 

$

(67)

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Cash flow hedging relationships

  Interest expense   282    —       282  

 

Interest expense

 

229 

 

 -

 

229 

Foreign currency relationships

  Other (income) expense, net   (681  —       —    

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

1,612 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

    

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,774 

 

$

 -

 

$

229 
    $(526 $—      $282  
    

 

  

 

   

 

 

Based on the carrying value of the realized but unrecognized gains and losses on terminated derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2012,2013, Woodward expects to reclassify $171$99 of net unrecognized losses on

74


terminated derivative instruments from accumulated other comprehensive incomeearnings to earnings during the next twelve months.

Note 7.  Supplemental statement of cash flows information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012   2011   2010 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized

  $25,665    $26,140    $28,317  

 

$

26,627 

 

$

25,665 

 

$

26,140 

Income taxes paid

   52,705     50,360     41,533  

 

 

52,355 

 

52,705 

 

50,360 

Income tax refunds received

   3,183     9,496     10,867  

 

 

6,336 

 

3,183 

 

9,496 

Non-cash activities:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment on account

   6,065     6,333     2,270  

 

 

5,345 

 

6,065 

 

6,333 

Common shares issued from treasury stock for benefit plans (Note 18)

   9,335     —       —    

Common shares issued from treasury for benefit plans (Note 18)

 

9,780 

 

9,335 

 

 -

Notes receivable from municipalities for economic development incentives

 

8,114 

 

 -

 

 -

Cashless exercise of stock options

   —       1,982     4,190  

 

 

2,645 

 

 -

 

1,982 

Settlement of receivable through purchase of treasury shares in connection with the cashless exercise of stock options

   —       881     —    

 

3,447 

 

 -

 

881 

Reduction of accounts receivable and short-term borrowing due to the settlement of accounts receivable previously sold with recourse

   —       3,228     —    

 

 -

 

 -

 

3,228 

Reduction of accounts payable due to the assignment of accounts receivable with recourse

   —       570     —    

 

 -

 

 -

 

570 

Reduction to goodwill due to favorable resolution of lease termination recorded in restructuring reserve

   —       103     —    

Reduction of goodwill due to favorable resolution of lease termination
recorded in restructuring reserve

 

 -

 

 -

 

103 

Payment of director fees through issuance of treasury stock

   —       52     —    

 

 -

 

 -

 

52 

In coordination with its customers and when terms are considered favorable to Woodward, Woodward sometimes transfers to third parties ownership of, and the obligation to collect, outstanding accounts receivable owed to Woodward in exchange for cash.  If such transfer is with recourse, then a short-term liability is recorded and is reflected in Woodward’s Consolidated Cash Flow Statement as a financing source.  The settlement of the transferred obligation is reflected in Woodward’s Consolidated Cash Flow Statement as both cash flow from operations due to the collection of accounts receivable and cash used in financing as the prior recourse obligation is extinguished.  Woodward had no outstanding accounts receivable transferred with recourse as of September 30, 20122013 or 2011.2012.

MPC Products, one of Woodward’s subsidiaries acquired in fiscal year 2009, was previously subject to an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding certain of its government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005. In the three-months ended December 31, 2009, MPC Products settled the criminal and civil claims related to the DOJ’s investigation and paid $25,000 in compensation and fines. The purchase price Woodward paid in connection with the acquisition of MPC was reduced by $25,000 at the time of the acquisition, which represents the amount discussed above. Payment of this amount during the year ended September 30, 2010 is reflected as an investing activity in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

On August 10, 2009, Woodward HRT, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward, sold the Fuel & Pneumatics (“F&P) product line, for $48,000 and during fiscal year 2010, Woodward received an additional $660 related to working capital adjustments typical in such transactions. The working capital adjustment amount is included in “Cash flows from investing activities” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The F&P product line provided a variety of off-turbine fuel management and pneumatic actuation components to producers of military and commercial aircraft and helicopters, as well as their suppliers.

75


Note 8.  Inventories

 

   September 30,   September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Raw materials

  $31,209    $43,172  

Work in progress

   85,942     108,718  

Component parts and finished goods

   281,078     229,665  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $398,229    $381,555  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

Raw materials

 

$

67,599 

 

$

31,209 

Work in progress

 

 

87,808 

 

 

85,942 

Component parts (1)

 

 

229,508 

 

 

229,401 

Finished goods

 

 

46,829 

 

 

51,677 

 

 

$

431,744 

 

$

398,229 

(1)

Component parts include items that can be sold separately as finished goods or included in the manufacture of other products.

Note 9.  Property, plant, and equipment net

 

   At September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Land

  $17,560   $14,823  

Buildings and improvements

   199,692    177,637  

Leasehold improvements

   20,821    18,765  

Machinery and production equipment

   284,494    265,898  

Computer equipment and software

   89,565    66,149  

Office furniture and equpment

   23,272    22,485  

Other

   2,444    2,706  

Construction in progress

   27,643    44,975  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   665,491    613,438  

Less accumulated depreciation

   (430,986  (406,713
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  $234,505   $206,725  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Depreciation expense

  $35,808    $40,400    $40,502  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

Land and land improvements

 

$

57,562 

 

$

27,794 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

195,008 

 

 

189,458 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

18,924 

 

 

20,821 

Machinery and production equipment

 

 

305,692 

 

 

284,494 

Computer equipment and software

 

 

97,538 

 

 

89,565 

Office furniture and equipment

 

 

24,400 

 

 

23,272 

Other

 

 

14,197 

 

 

2,444 

Construction in progress

 

 

81,428 

 

 

27,643 

 

 

 

794,749 

 

 

665,491 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(444,701)

 

 

(430,986)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

350,048 

 

$

234,505 

Woodward is developing a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area for its aerospace business in order to address the growth expected over the next ten years and beyond and to support a substantial number of recently awarded new system platforms, particularly on narrow-body aircraft.  During fiscal year 2010, Woodward began2013, $1,809 was recorded to land and land improvements in connection with this development.  Included in construction in progress at September 30, 2013 are $15,691 of a new forty-eight thousand square foot system test facility in Rockford, Illinois. In fiscal year 2012, Woodward placed into service assets totaling $22,126costs associated with the construction of the second campus, including $444 of capitalized interest. 

Woodward is also developing a new system test facility,campus at its corporate headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado to support the majoritycontinued growth of our energy business by supplementing its existing Colorado manufacturing facilities and corporate headquarters.  During fiscal year 2013, $9,302 was recorded to land and land improvements in connection with this development.  Included in construction in progress at September 30, 2013 are $10,514 of costs associated with the construction of the new campus, including $394 of capitalized interest. 

In addition, in September 2013, Woodward invested $25,602 on a building site in Niles, Illinois, of which $13,535 was recorded to land and land improvements.  The remaining $12,067 is included in “Buildings and improvements.” As of September 30, 2012, $192 of assets related to the system test facility remained as construction in progress and are expectedat September 30,

76


2013.  Woodward intends to be placed into service in early fiscal year 2013. The facility, which houses numerous environmental system test cells and a vibration lab, will support, among other development projects, Woodward’s Aerospace segment development efforts of next generation fuel systems for aircraft turbines.

The increase in “Computer equipment and software” of $23,416 was primarily related to assets that were placed into service during fiscal year 2012 associated withbuild a new ERP systemfacility on this site for a group within Woodward’s Aerospace segment.its aerospace business and will relocate some of its operations currently residing in Skokie, Illinois to this new facility. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Depreciation expense

 

$

37,254 

 

$

35,808 

 

$

40,400 

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, Woodward had capitalized interest that would have otherwise been included in interest expense of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Capitalized interest

 

$

1,215 

 

$

658 

 

$

1,354 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Capitalized interest

  $658    $1,354    $150  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 10.  Goodwill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2012

 

Additions

 

Effects of Foreign Currency Translation

 

September 30, 2013

Aerospace

 

$

356,773 

 

$

88,477 

 

$

23 

 

$

445,273 

Energy

 

 

104,601 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,750 

 

 

106,351 

Consolidated

 

$

461,374 

 

$

88,477 

 

$

1,773 

 

$

551,624 

 

            Effects of   
            Foreign   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  September 30,         Currency September 30, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2011   Additions   Adjustments Translation 2012 

 

September 30, 2011

 

Additions

 

Effects of Foreign Currency Translation

 

September 30, 2012

Aerospace

  $356,525    $—      $—     $248   $356,773  

 

$

356,525 

 

$

 -

 

$

248 

 

$

356,773 

Energy

   105,757     —       —      (1,156  104,601  

 

 

105,757 

 

 

 -

 

 

(1,156)

 

 

104,601 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated

  $462,282    $—      $—     $(908 $461,374  

 

$

462,282 

 

$

 -

 

$

(908)

 

$

461,374 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
            Effects of   
            Foreign   
  September 30,         Currency September 30, 
  2010   Additions   Adjustments Translation 2011 

Aerospace

  $356,680    $—      $(103 $(52 $356,525  

Energy

   81,914     24,188     —      (345  105,757  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated

  $438,594    $24,188    $(103 $(397 $462,282  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011,On December 28, 2012, Woodward completed the IDS Acquisitionacquisition of the Duarte Business (Note 4,Business acquisitions), which resulted in the recognition of $24,188$88,477 in goodwill.  The operations of the IDS Acquisition have beenDuarte Business are being integrated into Woodward’s Energy reportableAerospace segment.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, Woodward negotiated a lease settlement that was favorable in comparison to the previously recorded restructuring accrual established in purchase accounting in connection with the fiscal year 2009 acquisition of MPC. The resulting benefit of $103 was recorded as a reduction to goodwill.

Woodward tests goodwill for impairment at the individual or aggregated reporting unit level if aggregation is appropriate based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, on an annual basis and more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of an individual or aggregateda reporting unit below its carrying amount.  Based on the relevant U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance, Woodward sometimes aggregates components of a single operating segment into a reporting unit, if appropriate.   The impairment tests consist of comparing the implied fair value of each of the individual or aggregated reporting units with its carrying amount including goodwill.  If the carrying amount of the individual or aggregated reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value, Woodward compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the recorded carrying amount of goodwill.  If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its implied fair value. There

Uncertainty with respect to U.S. and other government renewable power incentives and economic factors associated with alternate energy sources have resulted in significant overcapacity and financial distress in the renewable power industry.  As  such, the Company made a decision to align its renewable power business appropriately for the current environment and foreseeable future.  In connection with this action, Woodward performed a goodwill impairment test, as of June 30, 2013, on the renewable power systems reporting unit.  This reporting unit is a component of an operating segment within the Energy

77


reportable segment.  The results of the impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value, and accordingly, no impairment charge recorded in fiscal years 2012, 2011, or 2010.existed.

Woodward completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of July 31, 20122013 during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.2013.  At that date, Woodward determined it was appropriate to aggregate certain components of the same operating segment into a single aggregated reporting units.unit.  The fair value of each of Woodward’s aggregated reporting units was determined using a discounted cash flow method.  This method represents a Level 3 input and incorporates various estimates and assumptions, the most significant being projected revenue growth rates, earnings margins, and the present value, based on the discount rate and terminal growth rate, of forecasted cash flows.  Management projects revenue growth rates, earnings margins and cash flows based on each aggregated reporting unit’s current operational results, expected performance and operational strategies over a five or ten-year period.  These projections are adjusted to reflect current economic conditions and demand for certain products, and require considerable management judgment.

Forecasted cash flows used in the July 31, 20122013 impairment test were discounted using weighted-average cost of capital assumptions ranging from 8.88%8.85% to 9.60%10.32%.  The terminal values of the forecasted cash flows were calculated using the Gordon Growth Model and assumed an annual compound growth rate after five or ten years of 4.05%4.25% or 4.50%.  These inputs, which are unobservable in the market, represent management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in determining the present value of the Company’s forecasted cash flows.  Changes in these estimates and assumptions can have a significant impact on the fair value of forecasted cash flows.  Woodward evaluated the reasonableness of the aggregated reporting unitsunit’s resulting fair values utilizing a market multiple method.

The results of Woodward’s goodwill impairment tests performed as of July 31, 20122013 indicated the estimated fair value of each aggregated reporting unit was substantially in excess of its carrying value, and accordingly, no impairment existed.

As part of the Company’s ongoing monitoring efforts, Woodward will continue to consider the global economic environment and its potential impact on Woodward’s business in assessing goodwill for possible indications of impairment.  There can be no assurance that Woodward’s estimates and assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows of certain reporting units, the current economic environment, the level of U.S. defense spending, including the sequestration of appropriations in fiscal year 2013 under the Budget Act, or the other inputs used in forecasting the present value of forecasted cash flows will prove to be accurate projections of future performance.

Note 11.  Other intangibles, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2013

 

September 30, 2012

 

Gross Carrying Value

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

Net Carrying Amount

 

Gross Carrying Value

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

Net Carrying Amount

Customer relationships and contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

279,225 

 

$

(77,288)

 

$

201,937 

 

$

205,221 

 

$

(59,297)

 

$

145,924 

Energy

 

42,008 

 

 

(29,711)

 

 

12,297 

 

 

41,770 

 

 

(26,623)

 

 

15,147 

Total

$

321,233 

 

$

(106,999)

 

$

214,234 

 

$

246,991 

 

$

(85,920)

 

$

161,071 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intellectual property:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Energy

 

20,218 

 

 

(14,722)

 

 

5,496 

 

 

20,001 

 

 

(13,229)

 

 

6,772 

Total

$

20,218 

 

$

(14,722)

 

$

5,496 

 

$

20,001 

 

$

(13,229)

 

$

6,772 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Process technology:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

76,718 

 

$

(26,129)

 

$

50,589 

 

$

71,716 

 

$

(20,622)

 

$

51,094 

Energy

 

23,458 

 

 

(11,699)

 

 

11,759 

 

 

23,166 

 

 

(9,706)

 

 

13,460 

Total

$

100,176 

 

$

(37,828)

 

$

62,348 

 

$

94,882 

 

$

(30,328)

 

$

64,554 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other intangibles:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

47,351 

 

$

(44,572)

 

$

2,779 

 

$

39,649 

 

$

(37,718)

 

$

1,931 

Energy

 

2,631 

 

 

(1,713)

 

 

918 

 

 

2,538 

 

 

(1,303)

 

 

1,235 

Total

$

49,982 

 

$

(46,285)

 

$

3,697 

 

$

42,187 

 

$

(39,021)

 

$

3,166 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total intangibles:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

403,294 

 

$

(147,989)

 

$

255,305 

 

$

316,586 

 

$

(117,637)

 

$

198,949 

Energy

 

88,315 

 

 

(57,845)

 

 

30,470 

 

 

87,475 

 

 

(50,861)

 

 

36,614 

Consolidated Total

$

491,609 

 

$

(205,834)

 

$

285,775 

 

$

404,061 

 

$

(168,498)

 

$

235,563 

78

 

   September 30, 2012   September 30, 2011 
   Gross          Gross        
   Carrying   Accumulated  Net Carrying   Carrying   Accumulated  Net Carrying 
   Value   Amortization  Amount   Value   Amortization  Amount 

Customer relationships:

          

Aerospace

  $205,221    $(59,297 $145,924    $205,171    $(41,652 $163,519  

Energy

   41,770     (26,623  15,147     41,991     (23,696  18,295  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $246,991    $(85,920 $161,071    $247,162    $(65,348 $181,814  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Intellectual property:

          

Aerospace

  $—      $—     $—      $—      $—     $—    

Energy

   20,001     (13,229  6,772     20,162     (11,918  8,244  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $20,001    $(13,229 $6,772    $20,162    $(11,918 $8,244  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Process technology:

          

Aerospace

  $71,716    $(20,622 $51,094    $71,691    $(15,380 $56,311  

Energy

   23,166     (9,706  13,460     23,451     (7,657  15,794  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $94,882    $(30,328 $64,554    $95,142    $(23,037 $72,105  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other intangibles:

          

Aerospace

  $39,649    $(37,718 $1,931    $39,635    $(34,655 $4,980  

Energy

   2,538     (1,303  1,235     2,621     (867  1,754  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $42,187    $(39,021 $3,166    $42,256    $(35,522 $6,734  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangibles:

          

Aerospace

  $316,586    $(117,637 $198,949    $316,497    $(91,687 $224,810  

Energy

   87,475     (50,861  36,614     88,225     (44,138  44,087  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated Total

  $404,061    $(168,498 $235,563    $404,722    $(135,825 $268,897  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Amortization expense

  $32,809    $34,993    $35,114  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Amortization expense

$

36,979 

 

$

32,809 

 

$

34,993 

Future amortization expense associated with intangibles is expected to be:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30:

    

 

 

 

 

2013

  $30,448  

2014

   27,298  

 

 

 

$

33,328 

2015

   24,792  

 

 

 

29,257 

2016

   23,424  

 

 

 

27,553 

2017

   21,676  

 

 

 

25,788 

2018

 

 

 

24,959 

Thereafter

   107,925  

 

 

 

 

144,890 
  

 

 

 

 

 

$

285,775 
  $235,563  
  

 

 

Note 12.  Credit facilities and short-term borrowings

As of September 30, 2012,2013, Woodward’s short-term borrowings and availability under its various short-term credit facilities follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total availability

 

Outstanding letters of credit and guarantees

 

Outstanding borrowings

 

Remaining availability

Revolving credit facility

$

600,000 

 

$

(4,514)

 

$

 -

 

$

595,486 

Foreign lines of credit and overdraft facilities

 

28,227 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

28,227 

Foreign performance guarantee facilities

 

10,391 

 

 

(547)

 

 

 -

 

 

9,844 

 

$

638,618 

 

$

(5,061)

 

$

 -

 

$

633,557 

79

 

       Outstanding       
   Total   letters of credit  Outstanding  Remaining 
   availability   and guarantees  borrowings  availability 

Revolving credit facility

  $400,000    $(5,920 $—     $394,080  

Foreign lines of credit and overdraft facilities

   11,776     —      (329  11,447  

Foreign performance guarantee facilities

   9,610     (470  —      9,140  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $421,386    $(6,390 $(329 $414,667  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

On January 4, 2012, Woodward’sJuly 10, 2013, Woodward terminated its $400,000 revolving credit facility was amended(the “2012 Credit Facility”) established under a credit agreement (the “Third Amended and restatedRestated Credit Agreement”) and entered into a new revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) between Woodward and a syndicate of lenders led by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent.  The Revolving Credit Agreement matures in July 2018.  As compared to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, (the “Amended Revolver”) entered into between Woodward and a syndicate of nine lenders led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Amended Revolver extended the existing revolving credit facility’s maturity to January 2017 and the borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Agreement increased from $225,000$400,000 to $400,000. The Amended Revolver provides for an$600,000.  Subject to lenders’ participation, the option to increase available borrowings toexpand the commitment remains at $200,000, for a total borrowing capacity of up to $600,000, subject to$800,000 under the lenders’ participation.Revolving Credit Agreement.  Borrowings under the Amended and Restated RevolverRevolving Credit Agreement generally bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.95%0.85% to 1.525%1.65%.  There were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2012.2013.

The Amended RevolverRevolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants customary with such agreements, which are generally consistent with the covenants applicable to Woodward’s long-term debt agreements, and contains customary events of default, including certain cross default provisions related to Woodward’s other outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $30,000,$60,000, the occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due thereunder. In addition, the Amended Revolver requires that Woodward’sRevolving Credit Agreement includes the following financial covenants: (i) a maximum permitted leverage ratio for Woodward and its consolidated subsidiaries not to exceed 3.50:1.00, which ratio, subject to certain restrictions, may increase to 4.00:1.00 for the fiscal quarter (and the immediately following fiscal quarter) during which a permitted acquisition occurs and to 3.75:1.00 for the next two succeeding fiscal quarters, and (ii) a minimum consolidated net worth at any time equal or exceed $725,000,of $800,000, plus 50% of Woodward’s positive net income for the prior fiscal year and plus 50% of Woodward’s net cash proceeds resulting from certain issuances of stock, subject to certain adjustments.

Woodward’s obligations under the Amended RevolverRevolving Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., Woodward MPC, Products CorporationInc., and Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward.

In connection with the Amended Revolver,Revolving Credit Agreement, Woodward incurred $2,185$1,651 in financing costs, which wereare deferred and will beare being amortized to “Interest expense” using the straight-line method over the life of the agreement.  TheWoodward also had remaining $100$1,529 of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the prior $225,000 revolving credit facility were expensed in2012 Credit Facility, which have been combined with the first quarterfinancing costs associated with the Revolving Credit Agreement and amortized using the straight-line method over the life of fiscal year 2012 and are included in “Interest expense” in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.Revolving Credit Agreement.

On January 5, 2012, aA Chinese subsidiary of Woodward entered intohas a local credit facility with the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Company under which it hadhas the ability to borrow up to $5,000. On October 31, 2012, the local credit facility was increased by $17,700 to up toeither $22,700, or the local currency equivalent of $22,700.  Any cash borrowings under the local Chinese credit facility are secured by a parent guarantee from Woodward.  The Chinese subsidiary may utilize the local facility for cash borrowings to support its local operating cash needs.  Local currency borrowings on the Chinese credit facility are charged interest at the prevailing interest rate offered by the People’s Bank of China on the date of borrowing, plus a margin equal to 25% of that prevailing rate.  U.S. dollar borrowings on the credit facility are charged interest at the lenderslender’s cost of borrowing rate at the date of borrowing, plus a margin of 3%.  At September 30, 2012, theThe Chinese subsidiary had no outstanding cash borrowings under thisagainst the local credit facility.facility at September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

Woodward also has other foreign lines of credit and foreign overdraft facilities at various financial institutions, which are generally reviewed annually for renewal and are subject to the usual terms and conditions applied by the financial institutions.  Pursuant to the terms of the related facility agreements, Woodward’s foreign performance guarantee facilities are limited in use to providing performance guarantees to third parties.  There was $329 of borrowing outstanding as of September 30, 2012 andwere no borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2011 from2013 and $329 of borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2012 on Woodward’s other foreign lines of credit and foreign overdraft facilities.

Note 13.  Long-term debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

2008 Term loan – Variable rate of 1.47% at September 30, 2012, matured October 2013; unsecured

 

$

 -

 

$

41,875 

Series B notes – 5.63%, due October 2013; unsecured

 

 

100,000 

 

 

100,000 

Series C notes – 5.92%, due October 2015; unsecured

 

 

50,000 

 

 

50,000 

Series D notes – 6.39%, due October 2018; unsecured

 

 

100,000 

 

 

100,000 

Series E notes – 7.81%, due April 2016; unsecured

 

 

57,000 

 

 

57,000 

Series F notes – 8.24%, due April 2019; unsecured

 

 

43,000 

 

 

43,000 

Long-term borrowings under Line of Credit - Variable rate of 1.06% at September 30, 2013, unsecured

 

 

200,000 

 

 

 -

Total long-term debt

 

 

550,000 

 

 

391,875 

Less: current portion

 

 

(100,000)

 

 

(7,500)

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

$

450,000 

 

$

384,375 

80

 

   At September 30, 
   2012  2011 

2008 Term loan – Variable rate of 1.47% at September 30, 2012, matures October 2013; unsecured

  $41,875   $64,375  

Series B notes – 5.63%, due October 2013; unsecured

   100,000    100,000  

Series C notes – 5.92%, due October 2015; unsecured

   50,000    50,000  

Series D notes – 6.39%, due October 2018; unsecured

   100,000    100,000  

Series E notes – 7.81%, due April 2016; unsecured

   57,000    57,000  

Series F notes – 8.24%, due April 2019; unsecured

   43,000    43,000  

Senior notes – 6.39%, due October 2011; unsecured

   —      10,714  

Term notes – 5.95%, due June 2012; secured by land and buildings

   —      157  

Fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge gains

   —      3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

   391,875    425,249  

Less: current portion

   (7,500  (18,374
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

  $384,375   $406,875  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Under certain circumstances, the interest rate on each series of the Series B, C and D Notes is subject to increase if Woodward’s leverage ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, plus any unusual non-cash charges to the extent deducted in computing net income minus any unusual non-cash gains to the extent added in computing net income (“Debt Covenant EBITDA”) increases beyond a ratio of 3.5:1.0.

Required future principal payments of outstanding long-term debt as of September 30, 20122013 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30:

 

 

 

2014

 

$

100,000 

2015

 

 

 -

2016

 

 

107,000 

2017

 

 

 -

2018

 

 

200,000 

Thereafter

 

 

143,000 

 

 

$

550,000 

 

Year Ending September 30:

    

2013

  $7,500  

2014

   134,375  

2015

   —    

2016

   107,000  

2017

   —    

Thereafter

   143,000  
  

 

 

 
  $391,875  
  

 

 

 

The current portion of long-term debt included $3 at September 30, 2011 related to the fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge gains on certain interest rate swapsIn October 2008, Woodward entered into in 2002 in connection witha term loan credit agreement (the “2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement”).  During the issuance of the senior notes due in October 2011. The gain became fully amortized in the firstsecond quarter of fiscal year 2012.

The2013, the remaining outstanding indebtedness under the 2008 term loan and the Series B, C, D, E and F Notes (together, the “Notes”) are held by multiple institutions. The senior notes were paid-offTerm Loan Credit Agreement, which generally bore interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 2.25%, was repaid and terminated, without penalty, in October 2011.

Woodward’s obligations under the 2008 term loan and the Notes are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC Products Corporation and Woodward HRT, Inc., eachremaining balance of which is a wholly owned subsidiaryunamortized debt issuance costs of Woodward.$128 were written off to interest expense.

Certain financial and other covenants under Woodward’sWoodward's debt agreements contain customary restrictions on the operation of its business.  In the event of non-compliance with these covenants, certain additional restrictions might apply, including restrictions on the Company’sCompany's ability to pay dividends or make distributions on its capital stock.Management believes that Woodward was in compliance with the covenants under the long-term debt agreements at September 30, 2012.

2008 Term Loan2013.

In October 2008, Woodward entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement”), by and among Woodward; the institutions from time to time parties thereto as lenders; and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association as administrative agent; which provides for an initial $150,000 unsecured term loan facility, and may, from time to time, be expanded by up to $50,000 of additional indebtedness, subject to the Company’s compliance with certain conditions and the lenders’ participation. The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 2.25% and requires quarterly principal payments of $1,875 with a final principal payment of $34,375 due on October 1, 2013. The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement can be prepaid, or prepaid and terminated, without penalty.

The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, among others, covenants that place limits on the Company’s ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell the Company’s assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, make certain investments, make certain restricted payments, and enter into material transactions with affiliates. In January 2012, Woodward made amendments to the 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement that provided for certain changes to, among others, the affirmative, negative and financial covenants of the 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement consistent with the covenant provisions in the Amended and Restated Revolver Agreement. The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that (a) the Company’s ratio of consolidated net debt to Debt Covenant EBITDA, not exceed a ratio of 3.5:1.0 and (b) the Company have a minimum consolidated net worth of $725,000, plus 50% of net income for any fiscal year and 50% of the net proceeds of certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on a rolling four quarter basis. The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including certain cross-default provisions related to Woodward’s other outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $30,000, the occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due thereunder.

Series B, C, D, E and F Notes

In October 2008, Woodward entered into a note purchase agreement (the “2008 Note Purchase Agreement”) relating to the Series B, C, and D Notes.Notes (the “2008 Notes”).  In April 2009, Woodward entered into a note purchase agreement (the “2009 Note Purchase Agreement”) relating to the Series E and F Notes (the “2009 Notes”).

On October 1, 2013, Woodward entered into a note purchase agreement (the “2013 Note Purchase Agreement” and, together with the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement, the “Note Purchase Agreements”) relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal amount of $250,000 of its senior unsecured notes in a series of private placement transactions.  The aggregate principal amount is comprised of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Maturity Date

 

Interest Rate

Series G notes

$

50,000 

 

November 15, 2020

 

3.42%

Series H notes

 

25,000 

 

November 15, 2023

 

4.03%

Series I notes

 

25,000 

 

November 15, 2025

 

4.18%

Series J notes

 

50,000 

 

November 15, 2020

 

Floating rate - LIBOR plus 1.25%

Series K notes

 

50,000 

 

November 15, 2023

 

4.03%

Series L notes

 

50,000 

 

November 15, 2025

 

4.18%

 

$

250,000 

 

 

 

 

81


Woodward issued the Series EG, H and F Notes.I Notes (the “First Closing Notes”) on October 1, 2013 and used the proceeds to repay all of the outstanding balance on the Series B Notes due October 1, 2013.

TheUnder the terms of the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward intends to issue under a delayed draw, the Series J, K and L Notes have not been(the “Second Closing Notes” and, together with the 2008 Notes, 2009 Notes and First Closing Notes, the “Notes”) in an additional $150,000 aggregate principal amount on November 15, 2013.

Interest on the 2008 Notes and the First Closing Notes is, and interest on the Series K Notes and Series L Notes will be, payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year until all principal is paid.  Interest on the 2009 Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year until all principal is paid.  Interest on the Series J Notes will be payable quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year until all principal is paid.

None of the Notes were registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and they may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.  Holders of the Notes do not have any registration rights.

All of the issued Notes are or are expected to be held by multiple institutions.

Woodward’s obligations under the Notes are, or when issued will be, guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., Woodward MPC, Inc., and Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward.  Woodward’s obligations under the Notes rank, or when issued will rank, equal in right of payment with all of Woodward’s other unsecured unsubordinated debt, including its outstanding debt under the 2008 Term LoanLine of Credit Agreement and revolving credit facility (see Note 12,Credit facilities and short-term borrowings).

On October 1, 2013, Woodward also entered into amendments to the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement and 2009 Note Purchase Agreement that, among other things, conform certain of the affirmative and negative covenants in the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement, respectively, to the corresponding covenant provisions in the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement.

The Note Purchase Agreements contain customary restrictive covenants customary for such financings, including, among other things, covenants that place limits on Woodward’s ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell Woodward’s assets, merge or consolidate with other persons and enter into material transactions with affiliates. Under the financial covenants contained in the Note Purchase Agreements, Woodward’s priority debt may not exceed, at any time, 25% of its consolidated net worth.  Woodward’s leverage ratio cannot exceed 4.0 to 1.0 during any material acquisition period, or 3.5 to 1.0 at any other time on a rolling four quarter basis. In the event that Woodward’s leverage ratio exceeds 3.5 to 1.0 during any material acquisition period, the interest rate on each series of Notes will increase. Further, Woodward’s consolidated net worth must at all times equal or exceed $800,000 plus 50% of Woodward’s consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013.  The Note Purchase Agreements also contain customary events of default, including certain cross-default provisions related to Woodward’s other outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $25,000 with respect to the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement and $30,000 with respect to the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement,$60,000, the occurrence of which would permit the holders of the respective Notes to accelerate the amounts due.

The 2008 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that Woodward’s (a) ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated Debt Covenant EBITDA not exceed a ratio of 4.0:1.0 during any material acquisition period, or a ratio of 3.5:1.0Woodward, at any other time on a rolling four quarter basis and (b) consolidated net worth at any time equal or exceed $425,000 plus 50% of consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Additionally, under the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit the aggregate amount of priority debt to at any time exceed 20% of its consolidated net worth at the end of the then most recently ended fiscal quarter. Priority debt generally refers to certain unsecured debt of Woodward’s subsidiaries and all debt of Woodward and its subsidiaries secured by liens other than certain permitted liens.

The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that Woodward’s (a) ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated Debt Covenant EBITDA not exceed a ratio of 3.5:1.0 at any time on a rolling four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated net worth at all times equal or exceed $485,940 plus 50% of consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Additionally, under the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit the aggregate amount of priority debt to at any time exceed 20% of its consolidated net worth at the end of the then most recently ended fiscal quarter. Priority debt generally refers to certain unsecured debt of Woodward’s subsidiaries and all debt of Woodward and its subsidiaries secured by liens other than certain permitted liens.

Woodwardoption, is permitted at any time at its option, to prepay all, or from time to time to prepay any part of, the then outstanding principal amount of any series of the Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the series of the Notes to be prepaid (but, in the case of partial prepayment, not less than $1,000), together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to the date of payment, plus any applicable make-wholeprepayment compensation amount. The make-wholeprepayment compensation amount, as to the Notes other than the floating rate Notes, is computed by discounting the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal of the Notes being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of 50 basis points and the yield to maturity of U.S. Treasury securities having a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the Notes being prepaid. The prepayment compensation amount, as to the floating rate Notes, generally is computed as a percentage of the principal amount of such the floating rate Notes equal to (a) 2%, on or prior to November 15, 2014, (b) 1%, after November 15, 2014 and on or prior to November 15, 2015, and (c) 0% after November 15, 2015.

Debt Issuance CostsLine of Credit

In connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business, on December 21, 2012 Woodward entered into a 364 day uncommitted line of credit with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Line of Credit”).  The Line of Credit provides for

82


unsecured loans to Woodward of up to $200,000 on a revolving basis.  Loans made under the Line of Credit bear interest at a floating rate based, at the Company’s option, on either the prime rate or an adjusted LIBOR.  The Line of Credit under which Woodward may borrow terminates on December 20, 2013.  There was $200,000 outstanding on the Line of Credit as of September 30, 2013, which consisted of an adjusted LIBOR loan bearing interest at 1.06% and maturing on October 31, 2013.  Subsequently, the Company renewed the loan to extend the maturity to November 15, 2013.  The Company cannot repay the adjusted LIBOR loan prior to the November 15, 2013 maturity date without incurring a prepayment penalty.  Subject to lender participation, Woodward may renew the loan on the Line of Credit for one additional period prior to its termination on December 20, 2013.

The Line of Credit contains customary terms and conditions, as well as events of default customary for such financing arrangements, including cross-default provisions based on certain covenants and provisions contained in the Third Amended Revolver,and Restated Credit Agreement the occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due thereunder.

The proceeds from the Line of Credit were used to finance the acquisition of the Duarte Business as discussed in Note 4, Business acquisitions.  The Company incurred no financing fees in association with the Line of Credit.

Woodward classified the $200,000 outstanding on the Line of Credit as long-term as of September 30, 2013 based on its intention to refinance the $200,000 using new long-term debt facilities and/or its existing revolving credit facility.  Woodward currently has the ability to utilize its $600,000 revolving credit facility, which matures in July 2018, to refinance the entire $200,000 outstanding balance, if necessary.

Debt Issuance Costs

In connection with the Revolving Credit Agreement, Woodward incurred $2,185$1,651 in financing costs, which wereare deferred and will be amortized to “Interest expense” using the straight-line method over the life of the agreement.  Woodward also had remaining $1,529 of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the 2012 Credit Facility, which have been combined with the financing costs associated with the Revolving Credit Agreement and are being amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the Revolving Credit Agreement.  The remaining $100 of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the prior $225,000 revolving credit facility, which was amended and restated by the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement in fiscal year 2012, were expensed in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. During

In connection with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,2013 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward incurred $5,892 of debt issuanceapproximately $1,400 in financing costs, which are beingwill be deferred and amortized using the effective interest method or patterns that approximate the effective intereststraight-line method over the termlife of the debt to which theagreement.  As of September 30, 2013, $200 of financing costs relate. The related amortization is recognized as interest expense. Recognition of interest expensewere included in “Other assets” on the debt issuance costs associated with the 2009 term loan, which was paid-off in full and terminated in fiscal year 2010, were accelerated and the remaining unamortized amount of debt issuance costs associated with the 2009 term loan were recognized in fiscal year 2010. Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Amounts recognized as interest expense from the amortization of debt issuance costs were $1,045 in fiscal year 2013, $1,074 in fiscal year 2012, and $764 in fiscal year 2011, and $1,515 in fiscal year 2010.2011.  Woodward had $3,869 of unamortized debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2013 and $3,263 of unamortized debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2012 and $2,153 of unamortized debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2011.2012.  Amortization of debt issuance costs is included in operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

83


Note 14.  Accrued liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

Salaries and other member benefits

$

65,651 

 

$

64,416 

Current portion of restructuring and other charges

 

561 

 

 

1,101 

Warranties

 

15,224 

 

 

15,742 

Interest payable

 

11,437 

 

 

11,362 

Current portion of acquired performance obligations and unfavorable contracts (1)

 

23,977 

 

 

 -

Accrued retirement benefits

 

2,276 

 

 

2,702 

Deferred revenues

 

6,304 

 

 

7,232 

Taxes, other than income

 

6,504 

 

 

8,833 

Other 

 

27,207 

 

 

20,796 

 

$

159,141 

 

$

132,184 

(1)

For more information about acquired performance obligations and unfavorable contracts, see Note 4, Business acquisitions.

 

   At September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Salaries and other member benefits

  $64,416    $70,965  

Current portion of restructuring and other charges

   1,101     2,489  

Warranties

   15,742     14,083  

Interest payable

   11,362     11,611  

Accrued retirement benefits

   2,702     2,560  

Deferred revenues

   7,232     8,160  

Taxes, other than income

   8,833     5,097  

Other

   20,796     18,551  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $132,184    $133,516  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Warranties

Provisions of Woodward’s sales agreements include product warranties customary to these types of agreements.  Accruals are established for specifically identified warranty issues that are probable to result in future costs.  Warranty costs are accrued on a non-specific basis whenever past experience indicates a normal and predictable pattern exists.  Changes in accrued product warranties for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20122013 and September 30, 20112012 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

Warranties, beginning of period

$

15,742 

 

$

14,083 

Expense

 

12,037 

 

 

14,543 

Increases due to acquisition of Duarte Business

 

157 

 

 

 -

Reductions for settling warranties

 

(13,051)

 

 

(12,587)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

 

339 

 

 

(297)

Warranties, end of period

$

15,224 

 

$

15,742 

 

   At September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Warranties, beginning of period

  $14,083   $10,851  

Increases to accruals related to warranties during the period

   4,800    5,402  

Increases due to acquisition of IDS

   —      2,250  

Settlements of amounts accrued

   (2,843  (4,403

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (298  (17
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Warranties, end of period

  $15,742   $14,083  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Restructuring and other charges

The main components of accrued non-acquisition related restructuring charges, which were recognized in fiscal year 2009, include workforce management costs associated with the early retirement and the involuntary separation of employees in connection with a strategic realignment of global workforce capacity.  Restructuring charges related to fiscal year 2009 business acquisitions include a number of items such as those associated with integrating similar operations, workforce management, vacating certain facilities, and the cancellation of some contracts.

During the three-months ended December 31, 2010, Woodward negotiated a lease settlement that was favorable in comparison to the previously recorded restructuring accrual established in purchase accounting in connection with the fiscal year 2009 acquisition of MPC. The resulting benefit of $103 was recorded as a non-cash charge to restructuring and a reduction to goodwill previously established at the time of the acquisition of MPC. During the three-months ended December 31, 2010, Woodward also modified its exit plan related to its Pacoima, California location. As a result, the Company intends to occupy and continue operating from the Pacoima location for a longer period than originally anticipated. Accordingly, Woodward has reduced the anticipated exit costs by $1,513 for the Pacoima location.84


The summary of the activity in accrued restructuring charges during the fiscal years ended September 30, 20122013 and 2011September 30,  2012 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  At September 30, 

At September 30,

  2012 2011 

2013

 

2012

Non-acquisition related restructuring charges:

   

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued restructuring charges, beginning of period

  $365   $667  

$

130 

 

$

365 

Payments

   (257  (279

 

(101)

 

(257)

Non-cash adjustments

   24    (22

 

22 

 

24 

Foreign currency exchange rates

   (2  (1

 

 -

 

 

(2)
  

 

  

 

 

Accrued restructuring charges, end of period

  $130   $365  

$

51 

 

$

130 
  

 

  

 

 

Business acquisition restructuring charges:

   

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued restructuring charges, beginning of period

  $2,544   $5,446  

$

1,848 

 

 

2,544 

Payments

   (180  (705

 

(106)

 

(180)

Non-cash adjustments

   (516  (2,197

 

(581)

 

(516)
  

 

  

 

 

Accrued restructuring charges, end of period

  $1,848   $2,544  

$

1,161 

 

$

1,848 
  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total restructuring charges

  $1,978   $2,909  

$

1,212 

 

$

1,978 
  

 

  

 

 

Other liabilities included the following amounts$651 and $877 of accrued restructuring charges not expected to be settled within twelve months:months as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

   At September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Non-current accrued restructuring charges

  $877    $420  

Note 15.  Other liabilities

 

   At September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Net accrued retirement benefits, less amounts recognized within accrued liabilities

  $80,341    $61,994  

Uncertain tax positions, net of offsetting benefits (Note 17)

   15,061     14,078  

Other

   14,041     12,622  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $109,443    $88,694  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

Net accrued retirement benefits, less amounts recognized within accrued liabilities

 

$

39,956 

 

$

80,341 

Total unrecognized tax benefits, net of offsetting adjustments

 

 

20,343 

 

 

15,061 

Acquired performance obligations and unfavorable contracts (1)

 

 

13,951 

 

 

 -

Other

 

 

21,260 

 

 

14,041 

 

 

$

95,510 

 

$

109,443 

(1)

For more information about acquired performance obligations and unfavorable contracts, see Note 4, Businessacquisitions.

Note 16.  Other (income) expense, net

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Net (gain) loss on sale of assets

  $16   $644   $(131

Rent income

   (504  (576  (515

Net gain on investments in deferred compensation program

   (1,052  (31  (520

Net (income) expense recognized in earnings on foreign currency derivatives (Note 6)

   —      1,612    (681

Other

   (40  (61  56  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $(1,580 $1,588   $(1,791
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For additional information regarding “Net (income) expense recognized in earnings on foreign currency derivatives” refer to Note 6,Derivative instruments and hedging activities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Net (gain) loss on sale of assets

 

$

(100)

 

$

16 

 

$

644 

Rent income

 

 

(555)

 

 

(504)

 

 

(576)

Net gain on investments in deferred compensation program

 

 

(946)

 

 

(1,052)

 

 

(31)

Net expense recognized in earnings on foreign currency derivatives (Note 6)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,612 

Other

 

 

(21)

 

 

(40)

 

 

(61)

 

 

$

(1,622)

 

$

(1,580)

 

$

1,588 

85


Note 17.  Income taxes

Income taxes consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

29,438 

 

$

47,862 

 

$

48,041 

 

State

 

 

4,760 

 

 

4,452 

 

 

6,237 

 

Foreign

 

 

10,612 

 

 

11,594 

 

 

9,743 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

13,904 

 

 

(9,632)

 

 

(8,680)

 

State

 

 

885 

 

 

(200)

 

 

(552)

 

Foreign

 

 

(5,970)

 

 

2,142 

 

 

543 

 

 

 

$

53,629 

 

$

56,218 

 

$

55,332 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Current:

    

Federal

  $47,862   $48,041   $9,818  

State

   4,452    6,237    5,600  

Foreign

   11,594    9,743    13,112  

Deferred

    

Federal

   (9,632  (8,680  13,789  

State

   (200  (552  1,681  

Foreign

   2,142    543    (287
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $56,218   $55,332   $43,713  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings before income taxes by geographical area consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

United States

 

$

148,604 

 

$

146,535 

 

$

149,744 

Other countries

 

 

50,967 

 

 

51,272 

 

 

37,823 

 

 

$

199,571 

 

$

197,807 

 

$

187,567 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

United States

  $146,535    $149,744    $103,771  

Other countries

   51,272     37,823     51,104  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $197,807    $187,567    $154,875  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

DeferredSignificant components of deferred income taxes presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are related to the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retirement healthcare and early retirement benefits

 

$

10,563 

 

$

13,727 

 

Foreign net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

7,058 

 

 

2,972 

 

Inventory

 

 

16,944 

 

 

14,770 

 

Deferred and stock-based compensation

 

 

18,657 

 

 

16,451 

 

Defined benefit pension

 

 

866 

 

 

14,388 

 

Other reserves

 

 

9,055 

 

 

10,751 

 

Credits and incentives

 

 

8,046 

 

 

4,145 

 

Other

 

 

10,584 

 

 

5,607 

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(11,783)

 

 

(2,752)

 

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

 

69,990 

 

 

80,059 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill and intangibles - net

 

 

(97,804)

 

 

(100,889)

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

(17,175)

 

 

(5,699)

 

Other

 

 

(3,391)

 

 

(3,028)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(118,370)

 

 

(109,616)

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

$

(48,380)

 

$

(29,557)

86

 

   At September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Retirement healthcare and early retirement benefits

  $13,727   $12,417  

Foreign net operating loss carryforwards

   2,972    4,276  

Inventory

   14,770    18,194  

Deferred compensation

   16,451    14,223  

Defined benefit pension

   14,388    7,681  

Other

   20,503    21,054  

Valuation allowance

   (2,752  (3,201
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

   80,059    74,644  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Goodwill and intangibles—net

   (100,889  (103,393

Other

   (8,727  (8,500
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (109,616  (111,893
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(29,557 $(37,249
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Woodward has recorded a net operating loss (“NOL”) deferred tax asset of $2,972$7,058 as of September 30, 2012, reflecting the benefit2013.  A portion of $15,744 in foreign net operating loss carryforwards. Thesethese carryforwards will expire by 20192020 and are currently offset by a 100%100 percent valuation allowance.allowance, while the remaining portion has an indefinite carryforward period and has no valuation allowance against it.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  Both positive and negative evidence are considered in forming Woodward’s judgment as to whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, and more weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified.  Valuation allowances are reassessed whenever there are changes in circumstances that may cause a change in judgment.

At September 30, 2012,2013, Woodward has not provided for taxes on undistributed foreign earnings of $213,576$207,224 that it considersconsidered indefinitely reinvested.  These earnings could become subject to income taxes if they are remitted as dividends, are loaned to Woodward or any of Woodward’s subsidiariessubsidies located in the United States, or if Woodward sells its stock in the foreign subsidiaries.subsidies.  However, the Company believes that any additional taxes could be offset, in part or in whole, by foreign tax credits would largely offset any income tax that might otherwise be due.credits. 

The reasons forfollowing is a reconciliation of the differences betweenU.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent to Woodward’s effective income tax rate and the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate were as follows:rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2012 2011 2010 

 

 

Year Ending September 30,

Percent of pretax earnings

    

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Statutory tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

 

35.0 

%

 

35.0 

%

 

35.0 

%

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

   1.6    2.3    2.4  

 

1.8 

 

 

1.6 

 

 

2.3 

 

Foreign tax rate differences, including repatriation reserve change

   (3.3  (0.3  (1.4

Taxes on international activities

 

(1.7)

 

 

(3.3)

 

 

(0.3)

 

Research credit

   (0.8  (2.7  (0.5

 

(3.1)

 

 

(0.8)

 

 

(2.7)

 

Retroactive extension of research credit

   —      (2.1  —    

 

(2.5)

 

 

 -

 

 

(2.1)

 

Domestic production activities deduction

   (1.9  (2.1  (0.9

 

(2.0)

 

 

(1.9)

 

 

(2.1)

 

Adjustment of tax issues for previous periods and audit settlements

   (1.5  (0.2  (5.9

Adjustment of prior period tax items

 

(0.6)

 

 

(1.5)

 

 

(0.2)

 

Other items, net

   (0.7  (0.4  (0.5

 

 -

 

 

(0.7)

 

 

(0.4)

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective tax rate

   28.4  29.5  28.2

 

26.9 

%

 

28.4 

%

 

29.5 

%

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

87


In determining the tax amounts in Woodward’s financial statements, estimates are sometimes used that are subsequently adjusted in the actual filing of tax returns or by updated calculations.  Such adjustments resulted in net tax benefits of $2,813 and $497 and a net tax expense of $476 in fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively. In addition, Woodwardwe occasionally hashave resolutions of tax issuesitems with tax authorities related to prior years due to the conclusion of audits and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.   The resolutionSuch adjustments are included in the “Adjustments of such mattersprior period tax items” line in the above table.

On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the “Taxpayer Relief Act”) was enacted, which retroactively extended the U.S. research and lapsingexperimentation tax credit through December 31, 2013.  As a result, income taxes for fiscal year 2013 included a net expense reduction related to the retroactive impact from the last three quarters of such statutes resulted in netfiscal year 2012 of the U.S. research and experimentation tax benefits of $1,130, $2,063 and $9,283 in fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively.credit pursuant to the Taxpayer Relief Act.

Income taxes for the year ended September 30, 2012 included a tax benefit of $3,326 related to a reduction in the anticipated amount of undistributed earnings of certain of Woodward’s foreign subsidiaries that were previously expected to be repatriated intoto the United States within the foreseeable future.  This item is reflected in the “Foreign tax rate differences, including repatriation reserve change” line in the rate reconciliation above. Woodward now anticipates that a portion of those earnings will remain indefinitely invested outside the United States and has accordingly it reversed the deferred tax liability associated with repatriating those earnings.

Income taxes for  This item is included in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 included an expense reduction of $3,908 related to“Taxes on international activities” line in the retroactive extension of the U.S. research and experimentation tax credit.rate reconciliation above.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits follows:

 

Balance, September 30, 2009

  $ 19,783  

Tax positions related to the current year

   1,734  

Tax positions related to prior years

   (7,320

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

   (3,611
  

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2010

   10,586  

Tax positions related to the current year

   4,264  

Tax positions related to prior years

   3,160  

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

   (1,079
  

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2011

   16,931  

Tax positions related to the current year

   1,444  

Tax positions related to prior years

   (169

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

   (137
  

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2012

  $18,069  
  

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2010

$

10,586 

Tax positions related to the current year

4,264 

Tax positions related to prior years

3,160 

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

(1,079)

Balance, September 30, 2011

16,931 

Tax positions related to the current year

1,444 

Tax positions related to prior years

(169)

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

(137)

Balance, September 30, 2012

18,069 

Tax positions related to the current year

5,587 

Tax positions related to prior years

1,079 

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

(2,041)

Balance, September 30, 2013

$

22,694 

Worldwide gross unrecognized tax benefits recorded at

Included in the time of the IDS Acquisition were $3,517.

The amountsbalance of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodward’s effective tax rate if recognized, netas of expected offsetting adjustments, were $15,061 atSeptember 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 are $17,838 and $14,078 at September 30, 2011.$13,713, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.  At this time, Woodward estimates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much as $2,190$565 in the next twelve months due to the completion of reviews by tax authorities and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations.

Woodward recognizesaccrues for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.  Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of the following:$2,066 as of September 30, 2013 and $1,701 as of September 30, 2012.

   At September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Accrued interest and penalties

  $1,701    $1,989  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Woodward’s tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities, and these audits are at various stages of completion at any given time.  FiscalWith a few exceptions, Woodward’s fiscal years remaining open to examination in the U.S. include fiscal years 2010 and thereafter, and fiscal years remaining open to examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 20042005 and forward. Woodward has been subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for fiscal years through 2008. Woodward is subject to U.S. state income tax examinations for fiscal years 2007 and forward.thereafter.

88


Note 18.  Retirement benefits

Woodward provides various benefits to eligible members of the Company, including contributions to various defined contribution plans and multiemployer defined benefit plans, pension benefits associated with defined benefit plans, postretirement medical benefits and postretirement life insurance benefits.  Eligibility requirements and benefit levels vary depending on employee location.

Defined contribution plans

Substantially allMost of the Company’s U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the U.S. defined contribution plan.  The U.S. defined contribution plan allows employees to defer part of their annual income for income tax purposes into their personal 401(k) accounts.  The Company makes contributions to eligible employee accounts, which are also deferred for employee personal income tax purposes.  Certain foreign employees are also eligible to participate in foreign plans.

Most U.S. employees with at least two years of service receive an annual contribution of Woodward stock, equal to 5% of their eligible prior year wages, to their personal Woodward Retirement Savings Plan accounts.  In Februarythe second quarter of fiscal years 2013 and 2012, Woodward fulfilled the annual Woodward stock contribution obligation using shares held in treasury stock by issuing 250 shares of common stock for a total value of $9,780 and 209 shares of common stock for a total value of $9,335.$9,335, respectively.  In the second quartersquarter of fiscal yearsyear 2011, and 2010, the annual Woodward stock contributionscontribution totaling $9,107 and $6,744, respectively, werewas funded by way of a cash contributionscontribution to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, which then purchased shares of Woodward stock on the open market.

The amount of expense associated with defined contribution plans was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Company costs

 

$

20,012 

 

$

18,296 

 

$

16,646 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Company costs

  $18,296    $16,646    $16,223  

Defined benefit plans

Woodward has defined benefit plans whichthat provide pension benefits for certain retired employees in the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Switzerland.  Approximately 950Woodward also provides other postretirement benefits to its employees including postretirement medical benefits and life insurance benefits.  Postretirement medical benefits are provided to certain current employees may receive future benefits under the plans and approximately 600 retired employees and their covered dependants and beneficiaries in the United States and the United Kingdom.  Life insurance benefits are eligibleprovided to receive future benefits orcertain retirees in the United States under frozen plans, which are currently receiving benefits.no longer available to current employees.  A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all of Woodward’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.

In connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business (see Note 4, Business acquisitions), Woodward did not assume the Seller’s postretirement benefit obligations under the Duarte Business’ defined benefit pension plan as they existed at the time of closing of the transaction.  Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Woodward established a new defined benefit pension plan for the Duarte Business employees who were beneficiaries of the Seller’s defined benefit pension plan (the “Duarte Pension Plan”).  Subsequently, Woodward and the Duarte Union agreed that, effective as of the close of business on July 31, 2013, the Duarte Pension Plan was amended to cease all future benefit accruals to current participants in the plan.  In addition, the Duarte Pension Plan was frozen to new entrants as of July 31, 2013.  The Duarte Pension Plan had expenses of $208 and Woodward made $50 of contributions to the plan during of fiscal year 2013.

In connection with the acquisition of IDS in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 (see Note 4,Business acquisitions), Woodward assumed pension benefit obligations that contributed to increases in recognized expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 compared2011.

In addition to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.

ExcludingDuarte Pension Plan, excluding the Woodward HRT Plan, the defined benefit plans in the United States were frozen in fiscal year 2007 and no additional employees may participate in the U.S. plans and no additional service costs will be incurred.

Pension plans

The actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of retirement pension benefits were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2012 2011 2010 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

United States:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   4.10  5.55  5.85
5.15 

%

 

4.10 

%

 

5.55 

%

Rate of compensation increase

   3.50    4.00    4.00  
3.50 

 

 

3.50 

 

 

4.00 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ending September 30:

    

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   5.55    5.85    5.50  
4.10 

 

 

5.55 

 

 

5.85 

 

Rate of compensation increase

   4.00    4.00    4.00  
3.50 

 

 

4.00 

 

 

4.00 

 

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   7.89    7.90    7.50  
7.59 

 

 

7.89 

 

 

7.90 

 

United Kingdom:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   4.60  5.10  4.90
4.50 

%

 

4.60 

%

 

5.10 

%

Rate of compensation increase

   3.90    4.30    4.30  
3.50 

 

 

3.90 

 

 

4.30 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ending September 30:

    

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   5.10    4.90    5.40  
4.60 

 

 

5.10 

 

 

4.90 

 

Rate of compensation increase

   4.30    4.30    4.10  
3.90 

 

 

4.30 

 

 

4.30 

 

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   6.00    6.00    6.50  
5.50 

 

 

6.00 

 

 

6.00 

 

Japan:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   1.50  1.50  1.25
1.25 

%

 

1.50 

%

 

1.50 

%

Rate of compensation increase

   2.00    2.00    2.00  
2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ending September 30:

    

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   1.50    1.25    1.75  
1.50 

 

 

1.50 

 

 

1.25 

 

Rate of compensation increase

   2.00    2.00    2.50  
2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   2.80    3.00    3.30  
2.80 

 

 

2.80 

 

 

3.00 

 

Switzerland:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   1.75  2.50  n/a  
2.25 

%

 

1.75 

%

 

2.50 

%

Rate of compensation increase

   2.00    2.00    n/a  
2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ending September 30:

    

Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   2.50    3.00    n/a  
1.75 

 

 

2.50 

 

 

3.00 

 

Rate of compensation increase

   2.00    2.00    n/a  
2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

 

2.00 

 

Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   2.50    3.00    n/a  
1.75 

 

 

2.50 

 

 

3.00 

 

89


The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments.  In the United States, Woodward used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding.    InBeginning in fiscal year 2012, Woodward refined its existing estimation process for determining the discount rates in the

90


United Kingdom and Japan and used cash flow matching to develop a single rate equivalent for a theoretical portfolio of non-callable, AA-rated bonds for each jurisdiction.  In fiscal yearsyear 2011, and 2010, Woodward used the iBoxx AA-rated corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark in the United Kingdom, and Woodward used Standard & Poors AA-rated corporate bond yields (applicable for bonds over 10 years) as the benchmark in Japan.    In Switzerland, Woodward used high quality swap rates plus a credit spread of 0.20%, 0.46% and 0.36%, in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as high quality swaps are available in Switzerland at various durations and trade at higher volumes than bonds.  Woodward’s assumed rates do not differ significantly from any of these benchmarks.

Compensation increase assumptions are based upon historical experience and anticipated future management actions.

In determining the long-term rate of return on plan assets, Woodward assumes that the historical long-term compound growth rates of equity and fixed-income securities will predict the future returns of similar investments in the plan portfolio.  Investment management and other fees paid out of the plan assets are factored into the determination of asset return assumptions.

Net periodic benefit costs consist of the following components reflected as expense in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   United States  Other Countries  Total 
   2012  2011  2010  2012  2011  2010  2012  2011  2010 

Service cost

  $3,530   $3,433   $3,647   $1,136   $992   $784   $4,666   $4,425   $4,431  

Interest cost

   5,816    5,646    4,890    2,280    2,284    2,261    8,096    7,930    7,151  

Expected return on plan assets

   (7,008  (6,693  (4,759  (2,584  (2,541  (2,361  (9,592  (9,234  (7,120

Amortization of:

          

Transition obligation

   —      —      —      —      —      86    —      —      86  

Net (gains) losses

   524    312    583    665    900    753    1,189    1,212    1,336  

Net prior service (benefit) cost

   75    75    (260  (9  (9  (8  66    66    (268

Settlement costs

   —      —      —      56    —      345    56    —      345  

Curtailment costs

   —      —      165    —      —      —      —      —      165  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic (benefit) cost

  $2,937   $2,773   $4,266   $1,544   $1,626   $1,860   $4,481   $4,399   $6,126  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Service cost

 

$

4,608 

 

$

3,530 

 

$

3,433 

 

$

1,052 

 

$

1,136 

 

$

992 

 

$

5,660 

 

$

4,666 

 

$

4,425 

Interest cost

 

 

5,569 

 

 

5,816 

 

 

5,646 

 

 

2,113 

 

 

2,280 

 

 

2,284 

 

 

7,682 

 

 

8,096 

 

 

7,930 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(8,183)

 

 

(7,008)

 

 

(6,693)

 

 

(2,610)

 

 

(2,584)

 

 

(2,541)

 

 

(10,793)

 

 

(9,592)

 

 

(9,234)

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (gains) losses

 

 

1,374 

 

 

524 

 

 

312 

 

 

465 

 

 

665 

 

 

900 

 

 

1,839 

 

 

1,189 

 

 

1,212 

Net prior service (benefit) cost

 

 

75 

 

 

75 

 

 

75 

 

 

(8)

 

 

(9)

 

 

(9)

 

 

67 

 

 

66 

 

 

66 

Settlement costs

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

37 

 

 

56 

 

 

 -

 

 

37 

 

 

56 

 

 

 -

Net periodic (benefit) cost

 

$

3,443 

 

$

2,937 

 

$

2,773 

 

$

1,049 

 

$

1,544 

 

$

1,626 

 

$

4,492 

 

$

4,481 

 

$

4,399 

Settlement costs were expensed in the fiscal years 20122013 and 20102012 as a result of normal attrition among participants in the Company’sCompany's defined benefit plansplan in Switzerland and Japan.Switzerland.  Woodward did not have any settlement costs in fiscal year 2011. Curtailment costs were associated with planned or actual workforce reduction actions.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the defined benefit pension plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  At or for the Year Ended September 30, 

 

At or for the Year Ended September 30,

  United States Other Countries Total 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

  2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

Changes in projected benefit obligation:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $106,341   $97,786   $57,355   $56,657   $163,696   $154,443  

 

$

137,639 

 

$

106,341 

 

$

60,837 

 

$

57,355 

 

$

198,476 

 

$

163,696 

Obligation assumed in IDS Acquisition

   —      —      —      2,038    —      2,038  

Service cost

   3,530    3,433    1,136    992    4,666    4,425  

 

 

4,608 

 

3,530 

 

1,052 

 

1,136 

 

5,660 

 

4,666 

Interest cost

   5,816    5,646    2,280    2,284    8,096    7,930  

 

 

5,569 

 

5,816 

 

2,113 

 

2,280 

 

7,682 

 

8,096 

Net actuarial (gains) losses

   24,689    1,686    1,636    (3,498  26,325    (1,812

 

 

(18,165)

 

24,689 

 

5,550 

 

1,636 

 

(12,615)

 

26,325 

Contribution by participants

   —      —      249    122    249    122  

 

 

12 

 

 -

 

241 

 

249 

 

253 

 

249 

Benefits paid

   (2,737  (2,210  (2,525  (2,090  (5,262  (4,300

 

 

(3,131)

 

(2,737)

 

(2,605)

 

(2,525)

 

(5,736)

 

(5,262)

Amounts paid by Company for Pension Protection Fund levy

   —      —      (20  (67  (20  (67

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2)

 

(20)

 

(2)

 

(20)

Settlements

   —      —      (330  —      (330  —    

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(406)

 

(330)

 

(406)

 

(330)

Curtailments

 

 -

 

 -

 

(271)

 

 -

 

(271)

 

 -

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   —      —      1,056    917    1,056    917  

   

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(2,618)

 

 

1,056 

 

 

(2,618)

 

 

1,056 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

  $137,639   $106,341   $60,837   $57,355   $198,476   $163,696  

 

$

126,532 

 

$

137,639 

 

$

63,891 

 

$

60,837 

 

$

190,423 

 

$

198,476 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in fair value of plan assets:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $89,980   $85,128   $48,367   $43,539   $138,347   $128,667  

 

$

105,966 

 

$

89,980 

 

$

55,537 

 

$

48,367 

 

$

161,503 

 

$

138,347 

Plan assets received in connection with IDS Acquisition

   —      —      —      1,604    —      1,604  

Actual return on plan assets

   18,123    482    5,246    708    23,369    1,190  

 

 

10,621 

 

18,123 

 

6,541 

 

5,246 

 

��

17,162 

 

23,369 

Contributions by the company

   600    6,580    3,359    4,151    3,959    10,731  

 

 

16,050 

 

600 

 

3,187 

 

3,359 

 

19,237 

 

3,959 

Contributions by plan participants

   —      —      249    122    249    122  

 

 

12 

 

 -

 

241 

 

249 

 

253 

 

249 

Benefits paid

   (2,737  (2,210  (2,525  (2,090  (5,262  (4,300

 

 

(3,131)

 

(2,737)

 

(2,605)

 

(2,525)

 

(5,736)

 

(5,262)

Settlements

   —      —      (330  —      (330  —    

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(406)

 

(330)

 

(406)

 

(330)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   —      —      1,171    333    1,171    333  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(1,838)

 

 

1,171 

 

 

(1,838)

 

 

1,171 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $105,966   $89,980   $55,537   $48,367   $161,503   $138,347  

   

$

129,518 

 

$

105,966 

 

$

60,657 

 

$

55,537 

 

$

190,175 

 

$

161,503 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net underfunded status at end of year

  $(31,673 $(16,361 $(5,300 $(8,988 $(36,973 $(25,349
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net over/(under)funded status at end of year

 

$

2,986 

 

$

(31,673)

 

$

(3,234)

 

$

(5,300)

 

$

(248)

 

$

(36,973)

91


The Company’s defined benefit pension plans in the United Kingdom, Japan and Switzerland represented $43,074, $14,747$49,027,  $11,824 and $3,016,$3,040, respectively, of the total projected benefit obligation at September 30, 20122013 and $43,792, $9,883$48,381,  $10,300 and $1,862,$1,976, respectively, of the total fair value of plan assets at September 30, 2012.

Woodward makes periodic cash contributions to its defined pension plans based on applicable regulations in jurisdictions that oversee its various pension plans, if any, and other factors. Contributions in fiscal year 2010 included a $10,000 discretionary contribution to the U.S. plans.2013.

The following tables provide the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position and accumulated comprehensive income for the defined benefit pension plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  At or for the Year Ended September 30, 

 

At or for the Year Ended September 30,

  United States Other Countries Total 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

  2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

Amounts recognized in statement of financial position consist of:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-current assets

  $—     $—     $718   $—     $718   $—    

 

$

4,154 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

718 

 

$

4,154 

 

$

718 

Other non-current liabilities

   (31,673  (16,361  (6,018  (8,988  (37,691  (25,349

 

 

(1,168)

 

 

(31,673)

 

 

(3,234)

 

(6,018)

 

(4,402)

 

(37,691)
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net underfunded status at end of year

  $(31,673 $(16,361 $(5,300 $(8,988 $(36,973 $(25,349

Net over/(under)funded status at end of year

 

$

2,986 

 

$

(31,673)

 

$

(3,234)

 

$

(5,300)

 

$

(248)

 

$

(36,973)
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized net prior service (benefit) cost

  $1,442   $1,517   $(14 $(24 $1,428   $1,493  

 

$

1,367 

 

$

1,442 

 

$

(4)

 

$

(14)

 

$

1,363 

 

$

1,428 

Unrecognized net (gains) losses

   29,819    16,769    12,198    13,779    42,017    30,548  

 

 

7,841 

 

 

29,819 

 

 

12,371 

 

 

12,198 

 

 

20,212 

 

 

42,017 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total amounts recognized

   31,261    18,286    12,184    13,755    43,445    32,041  

 

 

9,208 

 

 

31,261 

 

 

12,367 

 

 

12,184 

 

 

21,575 

 

 

43,445 

Deferred taxes

   (11,879  (6,949  (4,081  (4,763  (15,960  (11,712

 

 

(3,499)

 

 

(11,879)

 

 

(4,203)

 

 

(4,081)

 

 

(7,702)

 

 

(15,960)
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income

  $19,382   $11,337   $8,103   $8,992   $27,485   $20,329  

 

$

5,709 

 

$

19,382 

 

$

8,164 

 

$

8,103 

 

$

13,873 

 

$

27,485 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

92


The accumulated benefit obligations of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans in the United States and Other Countries were $116,061 and $60,701, respectively, at September 30, 2013 and $123,869 and $57,494, respectively, at September 30, 2012 and $96,630 and $54,304, respectively, at September 30, 2011.2012.

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognizedrecorded in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

 

Year Ended September 30,

  United States Other Countries Total 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

  2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

Net (gain) loss

  $13,574   $7,897   $(1,026 $(1,664 $12,548   $6,233  

 

$

(20,604)

 

$

13,574 

 

$

1,349 

 

$

(1,026)

 

$

(19,255)

 

$

12,548 

Settlement loss

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(36)

 

(56)

 

(36)

 

(56)

Amortization of:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gains (losses)

   (524  (312  (665  (899  (1,189  (1,211

 

 

(1,374)

 

(524)

 

(464)

 

(665)

 

(1,838)

 

(1,189)

Prior service benefit (cost)

   (75  (75  9    9    (66  (66

 

 

(75)

 

(75)

 

 

 

(68)

 

(66)

Settlement loss

   —      —      (56  —      (56  —    

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   —      —      167    376    167    376  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(673)

 

 

167 

 

 

(673)

 

 

167 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income

  $12,975   $7,510   $(1,571 $(2,178 $11,404   $5,332  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)

 

$

(22,053)

 

$

12,975 

 

$

183 

 

$

(1,571)

 

$

(21,870)

 

$

11,404 

The amounts expected to be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and reported as a component of net periodic benefit cost during fiscal year 2013 is2014 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  United   Other   

 

 

 

 

 

 

  States   Countries Total 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

Prior service (benefit) cost

  $75    $(9 $66  

 

$

75 

 

$

(4)

 

$

71 

Net actuarial (gains) losses

   1,374     506    1,880  

 

330 

 

 

642 

 

972 

Pension benefit payments are made from the assets of the pension plans.  Using foreign exchange rates as of September 30, 20122013 and expected future service assumptions, it is anticipated that the future benefit payments will be as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  United   Other     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30,

  States   Countries   Total 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

2013

  $3,631    $2,694    $6,325  

2014

   4,224     2,595     6,819  

 

$

4,137 

 

$

2,434 

 

$

6,571 

2015

   4,831     2,911     7,742  

 

4,770 

 

2,504 

 

7,274 

2016

   5,328     2,677     8,005  

 

5,285 

 

2,574 

 

7,859 

2017

   5,926     2,908     8,834  

 

5,929 

 

2,786 

 

8,715 

2018 – 2022

   39,900     15,746     55,646  

2018

 

6,572 

 

2,816 

 

9,388 

2019 – 2023

 

43,320 

 

16,232 

 

59,552 

93


Woodward expects its pension plan contributions in fiscal year 20132014 will be $6,000$500 in the United States, $1,854$1,867 in the United Kingdom, $1,392$1,108 in Japan and $184$187 in Switzerland.

Defined benefitPension plan assets

The overall investment objective of the pension plan assets is to earn a rate of return over time which, when combined with Company contributions, satisfies the benefit obligations of the pension plans and maintains sufficient liquidity to pay benefits.

As the timing and nature of the plan obligations varies for each Company sponsored pension plan, investment strategies have been individually designed for each pension plan with a common focus on maintaining diversified investment portfolios that provide for long-term growth while minimizing the risk to principal associated with short-term market behavior.  The strategy for each of the plans balances the requirements to generate returns, using investments expected to produce higher returns, such as equity securities, with the need to control risk within the pension plans using less volatile investment assets, such as debt securities.  A strategy of more equity-oriented allocation is adopted for those plans which have a longer-term investment plan based on the timing of the associated benefit obligations.

A pension oversight committee is assigned by the Company to each pension plan, excluding the pension plan in Switzerland which is a statutory plan.  Among other responsibilities, each committee is responsible for all asset class allocation decisions.  Asset class allocations, which are reviewed by the respective pension committee on at least an annual basis, are designed to meet or exceed certain market benchmarks which align with each plan’s investment objectives.  In evaluating the asset allocation choices, consideration is given to the proper long-term level of risk for each plan, particularly with respect to the long-term nature of each plan’s liabilities, the impact of asset allocation on investment results and the corresponding impact on the volatility and magnitude of plan contributions and expense and the impact certain actuarial techniques may have on the plans’ recognition of investment experience.  From time to time, the plans may move outside the prescribed asset class allocation in order to meet significant liabilities with respect to one or more individuals approaching retirement.

Risks associated with the plan assets include interest rate fluctuation risk, market fluctuation risk, risk of default by debt issuers and liquidity risk.  To manage these risks, the assets are managed by established, professional investment firms and performance is evaluated regularly by the Company’s pension oversight committee against specific benchmarks and each plan’s investment objectives.  Liability management and asset class diversification are central to the Company’s risk management approach and overall investment strategy.

The assets of the U.S. plans are invested in actively managed mutual funds.  The assets of the plan in Japan and the plan in the United Kingdom are invested in actively managed pooled investment funds.  Each individual mutual fund or pooled investment fund has been selected based on the investment strategy of the related plan, which mirrors a specific asset class within the associated target allocation.  The assets of the plan in Switzerland are insured through an insurance contract that guarantees a federally mandated annual rate of return.  Pension plan assets at September 30, 20122013 and 20112012 do not include any direct investment in Woodward’s common stock.

The asset allocations are monitored and rebalanced regularly by investment managers assigned to the individual pension plans.  The actual allocations of pension plan assets and target allocation ranges by asset class, are as follows:

 

  At September 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2012  2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Percentage Target  Percentage Target

 

At September 30,

  of Plan Allocation  of Plan Allocation

 

2013

 

2012

  Assets 

Ranges

  Assets 

Ranges

 

Percentage of Plan Assets

 

Target Allocation Ranges

 

Percentage of Plan Assets

 

Target Allocation Ranges

United States:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Class

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Securities

   60.9 39.8 - 79.8 %   58.7 39.7 - 79.7 %

 

61.7% 

 

40.7%

-

80.7%

 

60.9% 

 

39.8%

-

79.8%

Debt Securities

   38.9 30.2 - 50.2 %   41.1 30.3 - 50.3 %

 

38.1% 

 

29.3%

-

49.3%

 

38.9% 

 

30.2%

-

50.2%

Other

   0.2 0.0%   0.2 0.0%

 

0.2% 

 

0.0%

 

0.2% 

 

0.0%

  

 

    

 

  

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

   100.0    100.0 

United Kingdom:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Class

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Securities

   39.4 30.0 - 50.0%   37.7 40.0 - 60.0 %

 

48.4% 

 

40.0%

-

70.0%

 

39.4% 

 

30.0%

-

50.0%

Debt Securities

   60.6 45.0 - 75.0 %   62.2 35.0 - 65.0 %

 

51.5% 

 

35.0%

-

65.0%

 

60.6% 

 

45.0%

-

75.0%

Other

   0.0 0.0%   0.1 0.0%

 

0.1% 

 

0.0%

 

0.0% 

 

0.0%

  

 

    

 

  
   100.0    100.0 

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

Japan:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Class

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Securities

   40.5 36.0 - 44.0 %   39.9 36.0 - 44.0 %

 

41.3% 

 

36.0%

-

44.0%

 

40.5% 

 

36.0%

-

44.0%

Debt Securities

   58.6 55.0 - 63.0 %   59.2 55.0 - 63.0 %

 

57.8% 

 

55.0%

-

63.0%

 

58.6% 

 

55.0%

-

63.0%

Other

   0.9 0.0 - 2.0 %   0.9 0.0 - 2.0 %

 

0.9% 

 

0.0%

-

2.0%

 

0.9% 

 

0.0%

-

2.0%

  

 

    

 

  

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

   100.0    100.0 

Switzerland:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Class

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Securities

   0.0 0.0%   0.0 0.0%

 

0.0% 

 

0.0%

 

0.0% 

 

0.0%

Debt Securities

   0.0 0.0%   0.0 0.0%

 

0.0% 

 

0.0%

 

0.0% 

 

0.0%

Other

   100.0 100.0%   100.0 100.0%

 

100.0% 

 

100.0%

 

100.0% 

 

100.0%

  

 

    

 

  

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0% 

 

 

 

 

   100.0    100.0 

94


Actual allocations to each asset class can vary from target allocations due to periodic market value fluctuations, investment strategy changes, and the timing of benefit payments and contributions.

The following table presents Woodward’s pension plan assets using the fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP as of September 30, 2012.2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  At September 30, 2012 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3     

 

At September 30, 2013

  United   Other   United   Other   United   Other     

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

  States   Countries   States   Countries   States   Countries   Total 

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

United States

 

Other Countries

 

Total

Asset Category:

              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $246    $96    $—      $—      $—      $—      $342  

 

$

273 

 

$

149 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

422 

Mutual funds:

              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. corporate bond fund

   41,247     —       —       —       —       —       41,247  

 

 

49,328 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

49,328 

U.S. equity large cap fund

   36,925     —       —       —       —       —       36,925  

 

 

44,140 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

44,140 

International equity large cap growth fund

   27,548     —       —       —       —       —       27,548  

 

 

35,777 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

35,777 

Pooled funds:

              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japanese equity securities

   —       —       —       2,095     —       —       2,095  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

2,269 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

2,269 

International equity securities

   —       —       —       1,904     —       —       1,904  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,989 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,989 

Japanese fixed income securities

   —       —       —       4,316     —       —       4,316  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,414 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,414 

International fixed income securities

   —       —       —       1,478     —       —       1,478  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,535 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,535 

Global target return equity/bond fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,324 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,324 

Index linked U.K. equity fund

   —       —       —       8,624     —       —       8,624  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,060 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,060 

Index linked international equity fund

   —       —       —       8,606     —       —       8,606  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,047 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,047 

Index linked U.K. corporate bonds fund

   —       —       —       15,634     —       —       15,634  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

15,810 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

15,810 

Index linked U.K. government securities fund

   —       —       —       3,946     —       —       3,946  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,176 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,176 

Index linked U.K. long-term government securities fund

   —       —       —       6,976     —       —       6,976  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,908 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

4,908 

Insurance backed assets:

              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance backed assets

   —       —       —       —       —       1,862     1,862  

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,976 

 

 

1,976 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  $105,966    $96    $—      $53,579    $—      $1,862    $161,503  

 

$

129,518 

 

$

149 

 

$

 -

 

$

58,532 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,976 

 

$

190,175 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

95


Cash and cash equivalents:Cash and cash equivalents held by the Company’sCompany's pension plans are held on deposit with creditworthy financial institutions.  The fair value of the cash and cash equivalents are based on the quoted market price of the respective currency in which the cash is maintained.

Pension assets invested in mutual funds: The assets of the Company’s U.S. pension plans are invested in various mutual funds which invest in both equity and debt securities.  The fair value of the mutual funds is determined based on the quoted market price of each fund.

Pension assets invested in pooled funds: The assets of the Company’s Japan and United Kingdom pension plans are invested in pooled investment funds, which include both equity and debt securities.  The assets of the United Kingdom pension plan are invested in index-linked pooled funds which aim to replicate the movements of an underlying market index to which the fund is linked.  Fair value of the pooled funds is based on the net asset value of shares held by the plan as reported by the fund sponsors.  All pooled funds held by plans outside of the United States are considered to be invested in international equity and debt securities.  Although the underlying securities may be largely domestic to the plan holding the investment assets, the underlying assets are considered international from the perspective of the Company.

Pension assets invested in insurance backed assets:  A reputable Swiss insurer insures the assets of the Company’s Swiss pension plan.  The insurance contract guarantees a federally mandated annual rate of return.  The value of the plan assets is effectively the value of the insurance contract.  The performance of the underlying assets held by the insurance company has no direct impact on the surrender value of the insurance contract.  The insurance backed assets are not traded and therefore have no active market.

96


Changes in Level 3 pension plan assets consisted of the following:

 

   For the Year Ended 
   September 30, 2012 
   Level 3 Assets 

Fair value of Level 3 plan assets at beginning of year

  $1,874  

Actual return on plan assets

   107  

Contributions by the Company

   165  

Contributions by plan participants

   222  

Benefits paid

   (106

Settlements

   (330

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (70
  

 

 

 

Fair value of Level 3 plan assets at end of year $

   1,862  
  

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

September 30, 2013

Level 3 Assets

Fair value of Level 3 plan assets at beginning of year

$

1,862 

Actual return on plan assets

25 

Contributions by the Company

205 

Contributions by plan participants

214 

Settlements

(406)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

76 

Fair value of Level 3 plan assets at end of year

$

1,976 

There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 assets in fiscal year 2013.

Other postretirement benefit plans

Woodward provides other postretirement benefits to its employees including postretirement medical benefits and life insurance benefits.  Postretirement medical benefits are provided to certain current and retired employees and their covered dependants and beneficiaries in the United States and the United Kingdom.  Benefits include the option to elect company provided medical insurance coverage to age 65 and a Medicare supplemental plan after age 65.  Life insurance benefits are provided to certain retirees in the United States under frozen plans which are no longer available to current employees.  A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for Woodward’s other postretirement benefit plans.

The postretirement medical benefit plans, other than the plan assumed in the acquisition of HRT in fiscal year 2009, were frozen in fiscal year 2006 and no additional employees may participate in the plans.  Generally, employees who had attained age 55 and had rendered 10 or more years of service before the plans were frozen were eligible for these postretirement medical benefits.

Certain participating retirees are required to contribute to the plans in order to maintain coverage.  The plans provide postretirement medical benefits for approximately 1,000900 retired employees and their covered dependants and beneficiaries and may provide future benefits to approximately 6560 active employees and their covered dependants and beneficiaries, upon retirement, if the employees elect to participate.  As the result of a plan amendment in fiscal year 2009, all the postretirement medical plans are fully insured for retirees who have attained age 65.

The actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of postretirement benefits were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2012 2011 2010 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Weighted-average discount rate used to determine benefit obligation at September 30

   4.11  5.54  5.84
5.14 

%

 

4.11 

%

 

5.54 

%

Weighted-average discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended September 30

   5.54    5.84    5.50  
4.11 

 

 

5.54 

 

 

5.84 

 

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the postretirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments.  In the United States, Woodward used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding.    InBeginning in fiscal year 2012, Woodward refined its existing estimation process for determining the discount rates in the United Kingdom and used cash flow matching to develop a single rate equivalent for a theoretical portfolio of non-callable,

97


AA-rated bonds.  In fiscal yearsyear 2011, and 2010, Woodward used the iBoxx AA-rated corporate bond index (applicable for bonds over 15 years) to determine a blended rate to use as the benchmark in the United Kingdom.  Woodward’s assumed rate did not differ significantly from this benchmark.

Assumed healthcare cost trend rates at September 30, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

 

 

 

7.00 

%

 

7.50 

%

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(the ultimate trend rate)

 

 

 

5.00 

%

 

5.00 

%

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

 

 

 

2022 

 

 

2018 

 

 

   2012  2011 

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

   7.5  8.0

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)

   5.0  5.0

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

   2018    2018  

Healthcare costs have generally trended upward in recent years, sometimes by amounts greater than 5%.  Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for postretirement medical plans.  A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

 

   1% increase   1% decrease 

Effect on projected fiscal year 2013 service and interest cost

  $165    $(143

Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at September 30, 2012

   3,759     (3,270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1% increase

 

1% decrease

Effect on projected fiscal year 2014 service and interest cost

 

$

141 

 

$

(124)

Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at September 30, 2013

 

 

2,620 

 

 

(2,303)

Net periodic benefit costs consist of the following components reflected as expense in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Service cost

 

$

71 

 

$

70 

 

$

92 

Interest cost

 

 

1,244 

 

 

1,798 

 

 

1,974 

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (gains) losses

 

 

(68)

 

 

91 

 

 

128 

Net prior service (benefit) cost

 

 

(158)

 

 

(550)

 

 

(871)

Net periodic (benefit) cost

 

$

1,089 

 

$

1,409 

 

$

1,323 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011  2010 

Service cost

  $70   $92   $120  

Interest cost

   1,798    1,974    2,081  

Amortization of:

    

Net (gains) losses

   91    128    189  

Net prior service (benefit) cost

   (550  (871  (1,249
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic (benefit) cost

  $1,409   $1,323   $1,141  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the postretirement benefits for the fiscal years ended September 30:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

Changes in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

37,550 

 

$

32,923 

Service cost

 

 

71 

 

 

70 

Interest cost

 

 

1,244 

 

 

1,798 

Premiums paid by plan participants

 

 

1,837 

 

 

2,176 

Net actuarial (gains) losses

 

 

(7,501)

 

 

5,412 

Benefits paid

 

 

(4,206)

 

 

(4,846)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

 

 

 

 

17 

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

28,996 

 

$

37,550 

Changes in fair value of plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Contributions by the company

 

 

2,369 

 

 

2,670 

Premiums paid by plan participants

 

 

1,837 

 

 

2,176 

Benefits paid

 

 

(4,206)

 

 

(4,846)

 Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Funded status at end of year

 

$

(28,996)

 

$

(37,550)

98

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Changes in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:

   

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $32,923   $37,222  

Service cost

   70    92  

Interest cost

   1,798    1,974  

Premiums paid by plan participants

   2,176    2,133  

Net actuarial (gains) losses

   5,412    (3,146

Benefits paid

   (4,846  (5,349

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   17    (3
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at end of year

  $37,550   $32,923  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Changes in fair value of plan assets:

   

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $—     $—    

Contributions by the company

   2,670    3,216  

Premiums paid by plan participants

   2,176    2,133  

Benefits paid

   (4,846  (5,349
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $—     $—    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Funded status at end of year

  $(37,550 $(32,923
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company’s postretirement medical plan in the United Kingdom represents $548$543 of the total benefit obligation at September 30, 2012.2013.  The Company paid $45$18 in medical benefits to participants of the United Kingdom postretirement medical plan in fiscal year 2012.2013.

The following tables provide the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position and accumulated comprehensive loss (income) for the postretirement plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

Amounts recognized in statement of financial position consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities

 

$

(2,231)

 

$

(2,639)

Other non-current liabilities

 

 

(26,765)

 

 

(34,911)

Funded status at end of year

 

$

(28,996)

 

$

(37,550)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized net prior service (benefit) cost

 

$

(794)

 

$

(951)

Unrecognized net (gains) losses

 

 

(4,379)

 

 

3,053 

Total amounts recognized

 

 

(5,173)

 

 

2,102 

Deferred taxes

 

 

1,970 

 

 

(794)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)

 

$

(3,203)

 

$

1,308 

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Amounts recognized in statement of financial position consist of:

   

Accrued liabilities

  $(2,639 $(2,503

Other non-current liabilities

  $(34,911  (30,420
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Funded status at end of year

  $(37,550 $(32,923
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) consist of:

   

Unrecognized net prior service (benefit) cost

  $(951 $(1,501

Unrecognized net (gains) losses

  $3,053    (2,272
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total amounts recognized

   2,102    (3,773

Deferred taxes

   (794  1,437  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)

  $1,308   $(2,336
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Woodward pays plan benefits from its general funds; therefore, there are no segregated plan assets as of September 30, 20122013 or September 30, 2011.2012.

The accumulated benefit obligations of the Company’s postretirement plans were $37,550$28,996 and $32,923$37,550 at September 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively.

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognizedrecorded in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

Net (gain) loss

 

$

(7,501)

 

$

5,412 

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gains (losses)

 

 

68 

 

 

(91)

Prior service benefit (cost)

 

 

158 

 

 

550 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

 

 

 -

 

 

Total recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)

 

$

(7,275)

 

$

5,875 

99

 

   Year Ended
September 30
 
   2012  2011 

Net (gain) loss

  $5,412   $(3,145

Amortization of:

   

Net gains (losses)

   (91  (128

Prior service benefit (cost)

   550    871  

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   4    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)

  $5,875   $(2,402
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Using foreign currency exchange rates as of September 30, 20122013 and expected future service, it is anticipated that the future Company contributions to pay benefits, excluding participate contributions, will be as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

$

3,954 

2015

 

 

4,028 

2016

 

 

4,026 

2017

 

 

3,956 

2018

 

 

3,886 

2019 – 2023

 

 

18,462 

 

Year Ending September 30,

    

2013

  $4,943  

2014

   4,940  

2015

   4,871  

2016

   4,840  

2017

   4,686  

2018 – 2022

   21,764  

Multiemployer defined benefit plans

Woodward operates two multiemployer defined benefit plans for certain employees in the Netherlands and Japan.  The amounts of contributions associated with the multiemployer plans were as follows:

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Company contributions

  $792    $757    $746  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Company contributions

 

$

797 

 

$

792 

 

$

757 

The plan in the Netherlands is a quasi-mandatory plan that covers all of our employees in the Netherlands and is part of the Dutch national pension system.

The Company may elect to withdraw from its multiemployer plan in Japan, although it has no plans to do so. If the Company elects to withdraw from the Japanese plan, it would incur a one-time contribution cost of between $1,500 and $2,000.  Changes in Japanese regulations could trigger reorganization of or abolishment of the Japanese multiemployer plan, which could impact future funding levels.

Note 19.  Stockholders’ equity

Common Stock

Holders of Woodward’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Board of Directors and have the right to one vote per share on all matters requiring stockholder approval.

Dividends declared and paid during the 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 fiscal years were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012   2011   2010 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Dividends declared and paid

  $21,351    $18,581    $17,085  

 

$

21,866 

 

$

21,351 

 

$

18,581 

Dividend per share amount

   0.31     0.27     0.24  

 

 

0.32 

 

0.31 

 

0.27 

100


Stock Repurchase Program

In September 2007,July 2010, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200,000 of Woodward’s outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period endingthat ended in September 2010July 2013 (the “2007“2010 Authorization”). Under the 2007 Authorization,  Woodward purchased a total of 551,233 shares of its common stock with an aggregate purchase price of $1,515$45,754,  1,132 shares with an aggregate purchase price of $44,110, and 208 shares with an aggregate purchase price of $6,837 of its common stock under the 2010 Authorization in fiscal year 2010.years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

InOn July 2010, the24, 2013, Woodward’s Board of Directors terminated the 2007 Authorization and approved a new stock repurchase plan, that replaced the 2010 Authorization, that authorizes the repurchase of up to $200,000 of Woodward’sits outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will end in July 20132016 (the “2010“2013 Authorization”).  As of September 30, 2013, Woodward has purchased a total of 1,132no shares with an aggregate purchase price of $44,110, 208 shares with an aggregate purchase price of $6,837, and 108 shares with an aggregate purchase price of $2,998 of its common stock under the 2010 Authorization in fiscal year 2012, fiscal year 2011, and fiscal year 2010, respectively.2013 Authorization.

Stock-based compensation

Non-qualified stock option awards and restricted stock awards are granted to key management members and directors of the Company.  The grant date for these awards is used for the measurement date.  Vesting would be accelerated in the event of retirement, disability, or death of a participant, or change in control of the Company, as defined.  These awards are valued as of the measurement date and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period for all awards, including awards with graded vesting.  Stock for exercised stock options and for restricted stock awards is issued from treasury stock shares.

Provisions governing the outstanding awards are included in the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Plan”).  The 2006 Plan was approved by stockholders and became effective on January 25, 2006.  No further grants will be made under the 2002 Plan.  The 2006 Plan made 7,410 shares of our common stock shares available for grants made on or after January 25, 2006, to members and directors of the Company, subject to annual award limits as specified in the 2006 Plan.  In October 2008, Woodward granted 70 shares of restricted stock from treasury stock shares to eligible management employees of MPC pursuant to the 2006 Plan.  These shares became fully vested in fiscal year 2011.  There were 3,7693,120 shares of our common stock shares available for future grants as of September 30, 2012.2013.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized was as follows:

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Employee stock-based compensation expense

  $8,628    $6,590    $6,686  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Employee stock-based compensation expense

$

9,414 

 

$

8,628 

 

$

6,590 

Stock options

The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of up to 7,410 share of our common stock, including in the form of stock options, to its employees and directors.  Woodward believes that these stock options align the interests of its employees and directors with those of its stockholders.  Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of Woodward’s stock at the date of grant, a  ten-year term, and generally with a four-year graded vesting schedule and termat a rate of 10 years.25% per year.

The fair value of options granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-valuation model using the assumptions in the following table.

   

Year Ended September 30,

   

2012

  

2011

  

2010

Expected term

  5.9 - 8.5 years  5.8 - 8.7 years  6.5 years

Estimated volatility

  48.9% - 55.6%  48.0% - 54.0%  51.0%

Estimated dividend yield

  0.7% - 1.1%  1.0% - 1.3%  1.4%

Risk-free interest rate

  0.8% - 1.6%  1.8% - 2.6%  3.4%

Woodward calculates the expected term, which represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding, based upon historical experience of plan participants.  Expected volatility is based on historical volatility using daily stock price observations.  The estimated dividend yield is based upon Woodward’s historical dividend practice and the market value of its common stock.  The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve, for periods within the contractual life of the stock option, at the time of grant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Expected term (years)

 

5.8 

-

8.6 

 

 

5.9 

-

8.5 

 

 

5.8 

-

8.7 

 

Estimated volatility

 

48.7%

-

54.9%

 

 

48.9%

-

55.6%

 

 

48.0%

-

54.0%

 

Estimated dividend yield

 

0.8%

-

1.0%

 

 

0.7%

-

1.1%

 

 

1.0%

-

1.3%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

0.8%

-

1.3%

 

 

0.8%

-

1.6%

 

 

1.8%

-

2.6%

 

101


The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted follows:

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Weighted-average grant date fair value of options

  $12.14    $15.00    $11.04  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Weighted-average grant date fair value of options

$

15.84 

 

$

12.14 

 

$

15.00 

The following is a summary of the activity for stock option awards during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012:2013:

 

 

 

 

 

    Weighted- 

 

 

 

 

    Average 

Number

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price

  Number Exercise Price 

Balance at September 30, 2011

   4,228   $20.12  

Balance at September 30, 2012

 

4,556 

 

$

$
21.79 

Options granted

   859    26.20  

 

693 

 

$
33.72 

Options exercised

   (454  13.62  

 

(796)

 

$
13.71 

Options forfeited

   (77  26.92  

 

(30)

 

$
29.11 
  

 

  

Balance at September 30, 2012

   4,556    21.79  
  

 

  

Balance at September 30, 2013

 

4,423 

 

$
25.06 

Exercise prices of stock options outstanding as of September 30, 201220, 2013 range from $6.15$9.83 to $44.54.

Changes in nonvestednon-vested stock options during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20122013 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

    Weighted- 

 

 

 

 

    Average 

Number

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price

  Number Exercise Price 

Balance at September 30, 2011

   1,368   $27.71  

Balance at September 30, 2012

 

1,670 

 

$

27.07 

Options granted

   859    26.20  

 

693 

 

33.72 

Options vested

   (483  27.44  

 

(596)

 

26.26 

Options forfeited

   (74  26.92  

 

(30)

 

29.11 
  

 

  

Balance at September 30, 2012

   1,670    27.07  
  

 

  

Balance at September 30, 2013

 

1,737 

 

29.97 

At September 30, 2012,2013, there was approximately $10,000$11,544 of total unrecognized compensation cost, which assumes a weighted averageweighted-average forfeiture rate of 6.4%5.2%, related to non-vested stock options,stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2002 Plan (for which Woodward expectsno further grants will be made) and the 2006 Plan.  The remaining unrecognized compensation cost is expected to recognizebe recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.42.1 years.

Information about stock options that have vested, or are expected to vest, and are exercisable at September 30, 2012,2013 was as follows:

 

          Weighted-     
      Weighted-   Average   Aggregate 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Average   Remaining Life   Intrinsic 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Number   Exercise Price   in Years   Value 

Number

 

Weighted- Average Exercise Price

 

Weighted- Average Remaining Life in Years

 

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Options outstanding

   4,556    $21.79     5.6    $55,798  

 

4,423

 

$

25.06 

 

 

5.7

 

$

69,796 

Options vested and exercisable

   2,886     18.72     4.0     44,020  

 

2,685

 

21.89 

 

4.1

 

50,888 

Options vested and expected to vest

   4,441     21.63     5.5     55,047  

 

4,329

 

24.93 

 

5.6

 

68,902 

102


Other information follows:

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Total fair value of stock options vested

  $5,907    $5,587    $3,786  

Total intrinsic value of options exercised

   12,521     10,145     14,083  

Cash received from exercises of stock options

   6,180     4,402     6,084  

Excess tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options

   3,990     3,558     5,115  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Total fair value of stock options vested

$

7,271 

 

$

5,907 

 

$

5,587 

Total intrinsic value of options exercised

 

19,692 

 

 

12,521 

 

 

10,145 

Cash received from exercises of stock options

 

8,272 

 

 

6,180 

 

 

4,402 

Excess tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options

 

5,154 

 

 

3,990 

 

 

3,558 

Note 20.  Commitments and contingencies

Woodward has entered into operating leases for certain facilities and equipment with terms in excess of one year under agreements that expire at various dates.dates.  Some leases require the payment of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs in addition to rental payments.  Future minimum rental payments required under these leases, excluding available option renewals, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30,

    

 

 

2013

  $7,578  

2014

   6,014  

$

8,447 

2015

   4,278  

 

6,660 

2016

   3,219  

 

4,801 

2017

   2,805  

 

4,019 

2018

 

2,057 

Thereafter

   5,730  

 

4,047 
  

 

 

Total

  $29,624  

$

30,031 
  

 

 

Rent expense for all operating leases totaled:

 

   Year Ended September 30, 
   2012   2011   2010 

Rent expense

  $10,247    $10,159    $9,604  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Rent expense

$

10,243 

 

$

10,247 

 

$

10,159 

Woodward enters into unconditional purchase obligation arrangements (i.e. issuance of purchase orders, obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as “take-or-pay”"take-or-

103


pay" contracts) in the normal course of business to ensure that adequate levels of sourced product are available to Woodward.  Future minimum unconditional purchase obligations are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ending September 30,

    

 

 

2013

  $153,599  

2014

   4,754  

$

287,187 

2015

   96  

 

20,587 

2016

   —    

 

150 

2017

   —    

 

2018

 

 -

Thereafter

   —    

 

40 
  

 

 

Total

  $158,449  

$

307,965 
  

 

 

Woodward also has construction related contractual obligations of approximately $44,000 as of September 30, 2013    related to the development of a second campus in the greater-Rockford, Illinois area, a new campus at its corporate headquarters in Fort Collins, Colorado, and a new facility in Niles, Illinois.

The U.S. Government, and other governments, may terminate any of Woodward’s government contracts (and, in general, subcontracts) at their convenience, as well as for default based on specified performance measurements.  If any of Woodward’s government contracts were to be terminated for convenience, the Company generally would be entitled to receive payment for work completed and allowable termination or cancellation costs.  If any of Woodward’s government contracts were to be terminated for Woodward’s default, the U.S. Government generally would pay only for the work accepted, and could require Woodward to pay the difference between the original contract price and the cost to re-procure the contract items, net of the work accepted from the original contract.  The U.S. Government could also hold Woodward liable for damages resulting from the default.

Woodward is currently involved in claims, pending or threatened litigation, other legal proceedings, investigations and/or regulatory proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including, among others, those relating to product liability claims, employment matters, worker’s compensation claims, contractual disputes, product warranty claims and alleged violations of various laws and regulations.  Woodward has accruedaccrues for known individual matters where it believes that it believes are likely tois probable the matter will result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss. 

Legal costs are expensed as incurred and are classified in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Woodward is partially self-insured in the United States for healthcare and worker’s compensation up to predetermined amounts, above which third party insurance applies.  Management regularly reviews the probable outcome of these claims and proceedings, the expenses expected to be incurred, the availability and limits of the insurance coverage, and the established accruals for liabilities.

While the outcome of pending claims, legal and regulatory proceedings, and investigations cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that any liabilities that may result from these claims, proceedings and investigations will not have a material effect on Woodward’sWoodward's liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.

In connection with the sale of the F&P product line during fiscal year 2009, Woodward assigned to a subsidiary of the purchaser its rights and responsibilities related to certain contracts with the U.S. Government. Woodward provided to the U.S. Government a customary guarantee of the purchaser’s subsidiary’s obligations under the contracts. The purchaser and its affiliates have agreed to indemnify Woodward for any liability incurred with respect to the guarantee.

In the event of a change in control of Woodward, as defined in change-in-control agreements with its current corporate officers, Woodward may be required to pay termination benefits to such officers.

Note 21.  Segment information

Woodward serves the aerospace market and the energy market through its two reportable segments—segments - Aerospace and Energy.  Woodward’s reportable segments are aggregations of Woodward’s operating segments.  Woodward uses reportable segment information internally to manage its business, including the assessment of business segment performance and decisions for the allocation of resources between segments.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those of the Company.  Woodward evaluates segment profit or loss based on internal performance measures for each segment in a given period.  In connection with that assessment, Woodward excludes matters such as charges for restructuring costs, interest income and expense, and certain gains and losses from asset dispositions.

104


A summary of total segmentconsolidated net sales and consolidated earnings before income taxesby segment follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012 2011 2010 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Segment external net sales:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $896,083   $843,032   $769,379  

$

1,061,477 

 

$

896,083 

 

$

843,032 

Energy

   969,544    868,670    687,651  

 

874,499 

 

 

969,544 

 

 

868,670 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total consolidated net sales

  $1,865,627   $1,711,702   $1,457,030  

$

1,935,976 

 

$

1,865,627 

 

$

1,711,702 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Segment earnings:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $130,192   $129,502   $112,171  

$

166,122 

 

$

130,192 

 

$

129,502 

Energy

   126,441    113,872    94,014  

 

98,940 

 

 

126,441 

 

 

113,872 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total segment earnings

   256,633    243,374    206,185  

 

265,062 

 

 

256,633 

 

 

243,374 

Nonsegment expenses

   (33,365  (30,942  (22,434

 

(39,061)

 

 

(33,365)

 

 

(30,942)

Interest expense, net

   (25,461  (24,865  (28,876

 

(26,430)

 

 

(25,461)

 

 

(24,865)
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated earnings before income taxes

  $197,807   $187,567   $154,875  

$

199,571 

 

$

197,807 

 

$

187,567 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant, and equipment, net, goodwill, and other intangibles, net.  A summary of consolidated total assets, consolidated depreciation and amortization and consolidated capital expenditures follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  At or for the year ended September 30, 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012   2011   2010 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Segment assets:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $1,059,754    $1,036,797    $994,868  

$

1,349,027 

 

$

1,059,754 

 

$

1,036,797 

Energy

   605,842     569,929     461,900  

 

599,007 

 

 

605,842 

 

 

569,929 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total segment assets

   1,665,596     1,606,726     1,456,768  

 

1,948,034 

 

 

1,665,596 

 

 

1,606,726 

Unallocated corporate property, plant and equipment, net

   15,763     8,556     6,111  

 

50,115 

 

 

15,763 

 

 

8,556 

Other unallocated assets

   178,605     166,152     200,354  

 

207,535 

 

 

178,605 

 

 

166,152 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated total assets

  $1,859,964    $1,781,434    $1,663,233  

$

2,205,684 

 

$

1,859,964 

 

$

1,781,434 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment depreciation and amortization:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $43,840    $50,167    $50,611  

$

49,887 

 

$

43,840 

 

$

50,167 

Energy

   21,738     21,691     21,165  

 

20,890 

 

 

21,738 

 

 

21,691 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total segment depreciation and amortization

   65,578     71,858     71,776  

 

70,777 

 

 

65,578 

 

 

71,858 

Unallocated corporate amounts

   3,039     3,535     3,840  

 

3,456 

 

 

3,039 

 

 

3,535 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated depreciation and amortization

  $68,617    $75,393    $75,616  

$

74,233 

 

$

68,617 

 

$

75,393 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment capital expenditures:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $32,244    $34,007    $13,744  

$

74,964 

 

$

32,244 

 

$

34,007 

Energy

   22,590     14,168     11,578  

 

28,137 

 

 

22,590 

 

 

14,168 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total segment capital expenditures

   54,834     48,175     25,322  

 

103,101 

 

 

54,834 

 

 

48,175 

Unallocated corporate amounts

   10,066     80     2,782  

 

38,499 

 

 

10,066 

 

 

80 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated capital expenditures

  $64,900    $48,255    $28,104  

$

141,600 

 

$

64,900 

 

$

48,255 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

105


Sales to General Electric were made by all of Woodward’s reportable segments and totaled approximately 15% of net sales in fiscal year 2013, 14% of net sales in fiscal year 2012, and 14% of net sales in fiscal year 2011, and 15% of net sales in fiscal year 2010.2011.  Accounts receivable from General Electric totaled approximately 10%11% and 11%10% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively.

U.S. Government related sales from our reportable segments were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Direct U.S. Indirect U.S. Total U.S. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Government Government Government 

Direct U.S. Government Sales

 

Indirect U.S. Government Sales

 

Total U.S. Government Related Sales

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

104,410 

 

$

289,197 

 

$

393,607 

Energy

 

3,649 

 

 

8,106 

 

 

11,755 

Total net external sales

$

108,059 

 

$

297,303 

 

$

405,362 

Percentage of total net sales

 

6% 

 

 

15% 

 

 

21% 
  Sales Sales Related Sales 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2012

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $78,075   $254,636   $332,711  

$

78,075 

 

$

254,636 

 

$

332,711 

Energy

   3,904    7,228    11,132  

 

3,904 

 

 

7,228 

 

 

11,132 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net external sales

  $81,979   $261,864   $343,843  

$

81,979 

 

$

261,864 

 

$

343,843 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Percentage of total net sales

   4  14  18

 

4% 

 

 

14% 

 

 

18% 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2011

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $67,116   $252,462   $319,578  

$

67,116 

 

$

252,462 

 

$

319,578 

Energy

   3,448    7,530    10,978  

 

3,448 

 

 

7,530 

 

 

10,978 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net external sales

  $70,564   $259,992   $330,556  

$

70,564 

 

$

259,992 

 

$

330,556 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Percentage of total net sales

   4  15  19

 

4% 

 

 

15% 

 

 

19% 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2010

    

Aerospace

  $62,287   $257,715   $320,002  

Energy

   3,355    5,294    8,649  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net external sales

  $65,642   $263,009   $328,651  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Percentage of total net sales

   5  18  23
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Accounts receivable from the U.S. Government totaled approximately 2%4% and 4%2% of accounts receivable at September 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively.

The customers who account for approximately 10% or more of sales to each of Woodward’s reporting segments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20122013 follow:

 

Customer

Aerospace

United Technologies,

Boeing, General Electric, United Technologies

Energy

General Electric, Repower Systems AG, CaterpillarWeichai Westport

External net

106


Net sales by geographical area, as determined by the location of the customer invoiced, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended September 30, 

Year Ended September 30,

  2012   2011   2010 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

United States

  $927,345    $874,791    $797,826  

$

1,058,912 

 

$

927,345 

 

$

874,791 

Europe (1)

   542,753     473,054     377,094  

 

480,922 

 

 

542,753 

 

 

473,054 

Asia

   288,738     264,493     191,761  

 

287,742 

 

 

288,738 

 

 

264,493 

Other countries

   106,791     99,364     90,349  

 

108,400 

 

 

106,791 

 

 

99,364 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated external net sales

  $1,865,627    $1,711,702    $1,457,030  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated net sales

$

1,935,976 

 

$

1,865,627 

 

$

1,711,702 

 

(1)

External net

Net sales to customers in Germany accounted for 13%9%,  12%13%, and 12% of consolidated external net sales for the years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, and 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Property, plant, and equipment, net by geographical area, as determined by the physical location of the assets, were as follows:

 

   At September 30, 
   2012   2011 

United States

  $175,233    $149,295  

Germany

   26,964     28,385  

Other countries

   32,308     29,045  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated property, plant and equipment

  $234,505    $206,725  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30,

 

2013

 

2012

United States

$

285,038 

 

$

175,233 

Germany

 

29,619 

 

 

26,964 

Other countries

 

35,391 

 

 

32,308 

Consolidated property, plant and equipment, net

$

350,048 

 

$

234,505 

107


Note 22.  Supplemental quarterly financial data (Unaudited)

Quarterly results for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20122013 and September 30, 20112012 follow:

 

   2012 Fiscal Quarters 
   First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Net sales

  $407,896    $468,793    $460,241    $528,697  

Gross margin (1)

   123,486     146,301     130,790     161,706  

Earnings before income taxes

   40,176     54,038     37,708     65,885  

Net Earnings:

        

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

   28,416     38,751     28,302     46,120  

Earnings per share attributable to Woodward:

        

Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward

   0.41     0.56     0.41     0.67  

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward

   0.40     0.55     0.40     0.66  

Cash dividends per share

   0.07     0.08     0.08     0.08  
   2011 Fiscal Quarters 
   First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Net sales

  $365,075    $418,866    $438,467    $489,294  

Gross margin (1)

   103,898     126,346     134,026     149,279  

Earnings before income taxes

   31,475     46,487     50,855     58,750  

Net Earnings:

        

Net earnings attributable to Woodward

   22,399     32,090     36,056     41,690  

Earnings per share attributable to Woodward:

        

Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward

   0.33     0.47     0.52     0.61  

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Wooward

   0.32     0.46     0.51     0.60  

Cash dividends per share

   0.06     0.07     0.07     0.07  

Notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Fiscal Quarters

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Net sales

$

408,339 

 

$

485,513 

 

$

483,759 

 

$

558,365 

Gross margin (1) 

 

118,766 

 

 

137,413 

 

 

134,277 

 

 

169,249 

Earnings before income taxes 

 

38,537 

 

 

50,336 

 

 

35,497 

 

 

75,201 

Net earnings

 

27,368 

 

 

42,446 

 

 

23,663 

 

 

52,465 

Earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

0.40 

 

 

0.62 

 

 

0.35 

 

 

0.77 

Diluted earnings per share

 

0.39 

 

 

0.61 

 

 

0.34 

 

 

0.76 

Cash dividends per share

 

0.08 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Fiscal Quarters

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Net sales

$

407,896 

 

$

468,793 

 

$

460,241 

 

$

528,697 

Gross margin (1) 

 

123,486 

 

 

146,301 

 

 

130,790 

 

 

161,706 

Earnings before income taxes 

 

40,176 

 

 

54,038 

 

 

37,708 

 

 

65,885 

Net earnings

 

28,416 

 

 

38,751 

 

 

28,302 

 

 

46,120 

Earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

0.41 

 

 

0.56 

 

 

0.41 

 

 

0.67 

Diluted earnings per share

 

0.40 

 

 

0.55 

 

 

0.40 

 

 

0.66 

Cash dividends per share

 

0.07 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.08 

 

 

0.08 

Notes:

1.

Gross margin represents net sales less cost of goods sold excluding amortization expense.

108


Quarterly results by segment for the fiscal years endended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 follow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2012 Fiscal Quarters 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  First Second Third Fourth 

2013 Fiscal Quarters

External net sales:

     

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Segment external net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $193,226   $224,337   $214,474   $264,046  

$

211,389 

 

$

270,493 

 

$

272,218 

 

$

307,377 

Energy

  $214,670    244,456    245,767    264,651  

 

196,950 

 

 

215,020 

 

 

211,541 

 

 

250,988 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $407,896   $468,793   $460,241   $528,697  

$

408,339 

 

$

485,513 

 

$

483,759 

 

$

558,365 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Segment earnings:

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

  $27,060   $33,681   $21,536   $47,915  

$

31,568 

 

$

41,223 

 

$

38,949 

 

$

54,382 

Energy

   26,725    34,334    31,205    34,177  

 

23,908 

 

 

24,235 

 

 

12,430 

 

 

38,367 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $53,785   $68,015   $52,741   $82,092  

$

55,476 

 

$

65,458 

 

$

51,379 

 

$

92,749 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings reconciliation:

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total segment earnings

  $53,785   $68,015   $52,741   $82,092  

$

55,476 

 

$

65,458 

 

$

51,379 

 

$

92,749 

Nonsegment expenses

   (7,427  (7,509  (8,687  (9,742

 

(10,551)

 

 

(8,174)

 

 

(9,227)

 

 

(11,109)

Interest expense, net

   (6,182  (6,468  (6,346  (6,465

 

(6,388)

 

 

(6,948)

 

 

(6,655)

 

 

(6,439)
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated earnings before income taxes

  $40,176   $54,038   $37,708   $65,885  

$

38,537 

 

$

50,336 

 

$

35,497 

 

$

75,201 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  2011 Fiscal Quarters 
  First Second Third Fourth 

External net sales:

     

Aerospace

  $181,144   $204,945   $215,242   $241,701  

Energy

   183,931    213,921    223,225    247,593  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $365,075   $418,866   $438,467   $489,294  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Segment earnings:

     

Aerospace

  $19,914   $33,241   $35,402   $40,945  

Energy

   24,503    26,941    29,251    33,177  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $44,417   $60,182   $64,653   $74,122  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings reconciliation:

     

Total segment earnings

  $44,417   $60,182   $64,653   $74,122  

Nonsegment expenses

   (6,564  (7,481  (7,554  (9,343

Interest expense, net

   (6,378  (6,214  (6,244  (6,029
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated earnings before income taxes

  $31,475   $46,487   $50,855   $58,750  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Fiscal Quarters

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

Segment external net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

193,226 

 

$

224,337 

 

$

214,474 

 

$

264,046 

Energy

 

214,670 

 

 

244,456 

 

 

245,767 

 

 

264,651 

Total

$

407,896 

 

$

468,793 

 

$

460,241 

 

$

528,697 

Segment earnings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

$

27,060 

 

$

33,681 

 

$

21,536 

 

$

47,915 

Energy

 

26,725 

 

 

34,334 

 

 

31,205 

 

 

34,177 

Total

$

53,785 

 

$

68,015 

 

$

52,741 

 

$

82,092 

Earnings reconciliation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total segment earnings

$

53,785 

 

$

68,015 

 

$

52,741 

 

$

82,092 

Nonsegment expenses

 

(7,427)

 

 

(7,509)

 

 

(8,687)

 

 

(9,742)

Interest expense, net

 

(6,182)

 

 

(6,468)

 

 

(6,346)

 

 

(6,465)

Consolidated earnings before income taxes

$

40,176 

 

$

54,038 

 

$

37,708 

 

$

65,885 

WOODWARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010

(in thousands)

 

Column A

  Column B   Column C   Column D  Column E 
       Additions        

Description

  Balance at
Beginning of
Year
   Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
   Charged to
Other
Accounts (a)
   Deductions
(b)
  Balance at
End of Year
 

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

         

Fiscal year 2012

  $2,322    $4,139    $1,074    $(318 $7,217  

Fiscal year 2011

   2,228     1,028     159     (1,093  2,322  

Fiscal year 2010

   2,660     431     74     (937  2,228  

Notes:

109

 

(a)Includes recoveries of accounts previously written off.
(b)Represents accounts written off and foreign currency exchange rate adjustments. Currency translation adjustments resulted in a increase in the reserve of $4 in fiscal year 2012, a decrease in the reserve of $69 in fiscal year 2011, and a decrease in the reserve of $37 in fiscal year 2010.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There have been no disagreements or any reportable events requiring disclosure under Item 304(b) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms.  These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Principal Executive Officer (Thomas A. Gendron, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President) and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer (Robert F. Weber, Jr., Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Thomas A. Gendron and Robert F. Weber, Jr., evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K.  Based on their evaluations, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.2013.

Furthermore, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20122013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

On December 28, 2012, we acquired the Duarte Business as discussed in Note 4, Business acquisitions,  in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.  We considered the results of our pre-acquisition due diligence activities and the continuation by the Duarte Business of its established internal control over financial reporting as part of our overall evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2013.  The objectives of the Duarte Business’ established internal control over financial reporting are consistent, in all material respects, with Woodward objectives.  We are in the process of completing a more comprehensive review of the Duarte Business’ internal control over financial reporting, and will be implementing changes to better align its reporting and internal controls with the rest of Woodward.  As a result of the timing of the acquisition and the changes that are anticipated to be made, and in accordance with the general guidance issued by the SEC regarding exclusion of certain acquired businesses, we have excluded the Duarte Business from the September 30, 2013 assessment of Woodward’s internal control over financial reporting.  The Duarte Business will be included in the September 30, 2014 assessment of Woodward’s internal control over financial reporting.  The Duarte Business accounted for approximately 12.7% of Woodward’s total assets at September 30, 2013.  The Duarte Business accounted for 5.7% of Woodward’s total net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company.  We have evaluated the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting using the criteria established inInternal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and, based on that evaluation, have concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2012,2013, the end of the Company’s most recent fiscal year.

Deloitte & Touche, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, conducted an audit of Woodward’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012,2013, as stated in their report included in “Item 9A. – Controls and Procedures.”

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

110


 

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20122013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

111


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of


Woodward, Inc.


Fort Collins, Colorado

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Woodward, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2012,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at the Duarte Business, which was acquired on December 27, 2012 and whose financial statements constitute 12.7 % of  total assets and 5.7 % of net sales of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2013. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at the Duarte Business. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012,2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended September 30, 20122013 of the Company and our report dated November 15, 201214, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado
November 14, 2013

November 15, 2012

PART III112

 

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item relating to our directors and nominees, regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, and regarding our Audit Committee is included under the captions “Board of Directors,” “Board Meetings and Committees – Audit Committee” (including information with respect to audit committee financial experts), “Stock Ownership of Management,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement related to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held January 23, 201322, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required by this item relating to the identities and background of our executive officers and other corporate officers is included under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Item 1 of this report.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer.  This code of ethics is posted on our Website.  The Internet address for our Website iswww.woodward.com, and the code of ethics may be found from our main Web page by clicking first on “Investors” and then on “Corporate Governance,” and then on “Woodward Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information to our Website, at the address and location specified above.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

Item 11.Executive Compensation

Information regarding executive compensation is under the captions “Board Meetings and Committees – Director Compensation,” “Board Meetings and Committees – Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and “Executive Compensation” in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held January 23, 2013,22, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference, except the section captioned “Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis” is hereby “furnished” and not “filed” with this Form 10-K.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters is under the tables captioned “Stock Ownership of Management,” “Persons Owning More Than Five Percent of Woodward Stock,” and “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held January 23, 2013,22, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information set forth under “Board Meetings and Committees – Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures,” “Board of Directors” and “Audit Committee Report to Stockholders” in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders to be held January 23, 201322, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference except the section captioned “Audit Committee Report” is hereby “furnished” and not “filed” with this Form 10-K.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information regarding principal accountant fees and services is under the captions “Audit Committee Report to Stockholders – Audit Committee’s Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Audit Committee Report to Stockholders – Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held January 23, 2013,22, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV113

 


PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

Page Number in
Form 10-K

(a)

(1)

(a)(1)

Consolidated Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

49

55

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 20102011

50

56

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 20102011

51

57

Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 20122013 and 20112012

52

58

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 20102011

53

59

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 20102011

54

60

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

55

61

(a)

(2)

(2)

Consolidated Financial Statement SchedulesSchedule:

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

106

119

Financial statements and schedules other than those listed above are omitted for the reason that they are not applicable, are not required, or the information is included in the financial statements or the footnotes.

 

(a)

(3)

(a)(3)

Exhibits Filed as Part of This Report:

3.1

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended October 3, 2007, filed as Exhibit 3(i)(a) to Annual Report on

Form 10-K filed November 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference

3.2

3.2

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated January 23, 2008, filed as Exhibit 3(i)(b) to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference

3.3

3.3

Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated January 26, 2011, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference

3.4

3.4

Bylaws of Woodward, Inc., as amended and restated on January 26, 2011, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference

10.1

10.1

Long-Term Management Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(c) to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed December 22, 2000 (File No. 000-08408) and incorporated herein by reference

10.2

10.2

Summary Description of Management Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

114


10.3

10.3

2002 Stock Option Plan, effective January 1, 2002, filed as Exhibit 10(iii) to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2002 (File No. 000-08408) and incorporated herein by reference

10.4

10.4

Form of Outside Director Stock Purchase Agreement with James L. Rulseh, filed as Exhibit 10(j) to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed December 9, 2002 (File No. 000-08408) and incorporated herein by reference

†*

10.5

*†10.5

Summary of Non-Employee Director Meeting Fees and Compensation filed as an exhibit

10.6

10.6

Material Definitive Agreement with Thomas A. Gendron, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference

10.7

10.7

Material Definitive Agreement with Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference

10.8

10.8

2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective January 25, 2006, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 28, 2006 (File No. 333-133640) and incorporated herein by reference

10.9

10.9

Amendment No. 1 to the Woodward, Inc. 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of January 26, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference

10.10

10.10

Material Definitive Agreement with A. Christopher Fawzy, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 25, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference

10.11

10.11

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference

10.12

*†10.12

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, filed as an exhibitExhibit 10.12 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 15, 2012

†*

10.13

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement

†*

10.14

10.13

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (This form of award agreement has only been entered into with Thomas A. Gendron in connection with the restricted stock award as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2013.)

10.15

Third Amended and Restated

Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2012,July 10, 2013, by and among the Company, the foreign subsidiary borrowers party thereto, the institutions party thereto as lenders, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 10, 2012 and incorporated herein by referenceJuly 16, 2013

†*

10.16

*†10.14

Summary of Executive Officer Compensation filed as an exhibit

10.17

10.15

Dennis Benning Post Retirement Relocation Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 29, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference

10.18

10.16

Dennis Benning Promotion Letter dated October 1, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference

10.19

10.17

Chad Preiss Promotion Letter dated October 1, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference

10.20

10.18

Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among Woodward Governorthe Company, the institutions from time to time parties thereto as lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference

10.21

10.19Note Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among Woodward Governor Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
10.20

Amendment No. 1 to Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2009, by and among Woodward Governorthe Company, the financial institutions party to credit agreement referenced therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed April 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference

115


10.22

10.21

Amendment No. 2 to Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2012, by and among Woodward, Inc.,the Company, the financial institutions party to the credit agreement referenced therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 10, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference

10.23

Note Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among the Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2008

10.24

10.22

Amendment No. 1 to 2008 Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2013, by and among the Company and the noteholders named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2013

10.25

Note Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2009, by and among Woodward Governorthe Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference

10.26

Amendment No. 1 to 2009 Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2013, by and among the Company and the noteholders named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2013

10.27

10.23

Note Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2013, by and among the Company and the purchasers named therein, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2013

10.28

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2012, by and among the Company, Woodward HRT, Inc. GE Aviation Systems LLC and General Electric Company, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 28, 2012

10.29

Form of Change in Control Agreement for the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference

10.30

10.24

Form of Change in Control Agreement for the Company’s named executive officers other than the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference

†*

10.31

10.25

Executive Benefit Plan, as amended and restated filed as Exhibit 10.27 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed Novemberof September 18, 2010 (File No. 000-08408) and incorporated herein by reference

2013

10.32

10.26

Dennis Benning Confirmation of Assignment Extension Letter dated November 17, 2010, filed as exhibitExhibit 10.28 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2010 (Filed No. 000-08408) and incorporated herein by reference

10.33

10.27

James D. Rudolph Promotion Letter, dated February 10, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed April 27, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference

10.34

10.28

Mr. Martin V. Glass employment letter, dated April 27, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 26, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference

10.35

10.29

Sagar Patel employment letter, dated June 17, 2011, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 26, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference

10.36

*†10.30

Gerhard Lauffer Supplemental Agreement, dated September 25, 2012, filed as an exhibitExhibit 10.30 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 15, 2012

10.37

10.31

Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

10.38

10.32

Amendment No. 1 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of April 21, 2010, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

116


10.39

10.33

Amendment No. 2 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of April 21, 2009, filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

10.40

10.34

Amendment No. 3 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of November 8, 2009, filed as Exhibit 99.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

10.41

10.35

Amendment No. 4 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of December 1, 2010, filed as Exhibit 99.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

10.42

10.36

Amendment No. 5 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of December 1, 2010, filed as Exhibit 99.6 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

10.43

10.37

Amendment No. 6 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of November 8, 2011, filed as Exhibit 99.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed January 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference(File No. 333-179248)

10.44

Amendment No. 7 to the Woodward Retirement Savings Plan, dated as of March 1, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 26, 2013

*

21.1

21.1

Subsidiaries filed as an exhibit

*

23.1

*23.1

Consent of current Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm filed as an exhibit

*

31.1

*31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Thomas A. Gendron filed as an exhibit

*

31.2

*31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit

*

32.1

*32.1

Section 1350 certifications filed as an exhibit

*

101.INS

*101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

*

101.SCH

*101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

*

101.CAL

*101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

*

101.DEF

*101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

*

101.LAB

*101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

*

101.PRE

*101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following materials from Woodward, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012,2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

*

Filed as an exhibit

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

Incorporated by reference as an exhibit to this Report (file number 000-08408, unless otherwise indicated).

*

Filed as an exhibit to this Report

117


SIGNATURESSIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WOODWARD, INC.

 

Date:  November 15, 201214, 2013

/S/ THOMASs/ Thomas A. GENDRONGendron

THOMAS

Thomas A. GENDRONGendron

Chairman of the Board,

Chief Executive Officer, and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:  November 15, 201214, 2013

/s/ ROBERT F. WEBER, JR.

 

/s/ Robert F. Weber, Jr.

Robert F. Weber, Jr.

Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ John D. Cohn

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

John D. Cohn

/s/ Paul Donovan

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

Paul Donovan

/s/ Thomas A. Gendron

Chairman of the Board

November 15, 201214, 2013

Thomas A. Gendron

and Director

/s/ John A. Halbrook

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

John A. Halbrook

/s/ Michael H. Joyce

Director

November 15, 2012
Michael H. Joyce

/s/ Mary L. Petrovich

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

Mary L. Petrovich

/s/ Larry E. Rittenberg

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

Larry E. Rittenberg

/s/ James R. Rulseh

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

James R. Rulseh

/s/ Ronald M. Sega

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

Ronald M. Sega

/s/ Gregg C. Sengstack

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

Gregg C. Sengstack

/s/ Michael T. Yonker

Director

November 15, 201214, 2013

Michael T. Yonker

118


WOODWARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For the years ended September 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 20102011

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Column A

 

Column B

 Column C 

Column D

 

Column E

 

 

Column B

 

Column C

 

Column D

 

Column E

   Additions     

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balance at Charged to Charged to     
 Beginning of Costs and Other Deductions Balance at 

Description

 Year Expenses Accounts (a) (b) End of Year 

 

Balance at Beginning of Year

 

Charged to Costs and Expenses

 

Charged to Other Accounts (a)

 

Deductions (b)

 

Balance at End of Year

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year 2013

 

$

7,217 

 

$

3,408 

 

$

 

$

(1,758)

 

$

8,872 

Fiscal year 2012

 $2,322   $4,139   $1,074   $(318 $7,217  

 

 

2,322 

 

4,139 

 

1,074 

 

(318)

 

7,217 

Fiscal year 2011

  2,228    1,028    159    (1,093  2,322  

 

 

2,228 

 

1,028 

 

159 

 

(1,093)

 

2,322 

Fiscal year 2010

  2,660    431    74    (937  2,228  

Notes:

 

Notes:

(a)

Includes recoveries of accounts previously written off.

(b)

Represents accounts written off and foreign currency exchange rate adjustments.  Currency translation adjustments resulted in a increase in the reserve of $155 in fiscal year 2013, an increase in the reserve of $4 in fiscal year 2012, and a decrease in the reserve of $69 in fiscal year 2011, and a decrease in the reserve of $37 in fiscal year 2010.2011.

119

 

106