UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 29, 201226, 2015

Commission File Number 1-33268

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 68-0275553
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification Number)

 

 

1340 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Telephone Number: (925) 948-4000

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock

Class A Common Stock

 

Nasdaq

Nasdaq

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨

  Accelerated Filer  x

Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  Smaller Reporting Company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

At March 24, 2012,28, 2015, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock, Class A Common Stock and Class B Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $96.2$100.4 million, $285.0$346.6 million and $57,100,$63,000, respectively.

At November 30, 2012,2015, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock was 12,247,35911,908,317 and the number of shares of Class A Common Stock was 34,753,392.36,489,570. In addition, on such date, the registrant had outstanding 1,652,262 shares of its Class B Stock, which are convertible into Common Stock on a share-for-share basis.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders – Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 


Central Garden & Pet Company

Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the fiscal year ended September 29, 201226, 2015

 

     Page 
PART I  
Item 1. 

Business

   1  
Item 1A. 

Risk Factors.Factors

   14  
Item 1B. 

Unresolved Staff Comments

   23  
Item 2. 

Properties

   23  
Item 3. 

Legal Proceedings

   2524  
Item 4. 

Mine Safety Disclosures

   2524  
PART II  
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities   2625  
Item 6. 

Selected Financial Data

   2928  
Item 7. 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   3130  
Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

   4650  
Item 8. 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   4752  
Item 9. 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   4853  
Item 9A. 

Controls and Procedures

   4853  
Item 9B. 

Other Information

   4853  
PART III  
Item 10. 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   4853  
Item 11. 

Executive Compensation

   4853  
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   4854  
Item 13. 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   4954  
Item 14. 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   4954  
PART IV  
Item 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   4954  

 

i


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, our transformational efforts,projected cost savings, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, our competitive strengths and weaknesses, our business strategy our ability to pass through grain and other raw material price increases and the trends we anticipate in the industries and economiesmarkets in which we operate and other information that is not historical information. When used in this Form 10-K, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, our examination of historical operating trends, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but we cannot assure you that our expectations, beliefs and projections will be realized.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Form10-K. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this Form10-K are set forth in this Form10-K, including the factors described in the section entitled “Item 1A – Risk Factors.” If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize,materializes, or if any of our underlying assumptions areis incorrect, our actual results may differ significantly from the results that we express in or imply by any of our forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances. Presently known risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following factors:

the success of our transformational change initiatives;

disruptions in our business as we implement our transformational change initiatives and the resulting consequences to our business and results of operations;

increased costs and expenses associated with our transformational change initiatives;

 

seasonality and fluctuations in our operating results and cash flow;

 

fluctuations in market prices for seeds and grains and other raw materials;

 

our abilityinability to pass through cost increases in a timely manner;

the impending retirement of our CEO, dependence upon him and our other key executives and the ability to execute on our succession plan;

risks associated with new product introductions, including the risk that our new products will not produce sufficient sales to recoup our investment;

 

declines in consumer spending during economic downturns;

 

inflation, deflation and other adverse macro-economic conditions;

 

supply shortages in small animals and pet birds;

 

adverse weather conditions;

risks associated with our acquisition strategy;

 

fluctuations in energy prices, fuel and related petrochemical costs;

 

access to and cost of additional capital;

 

dependence on a small number of customers for a significant portion of our business;

 

consolidation trends in the retail industry;

 

uncertainty about new product innovations and marketing programs;

competition in our industries;

 

risks associated with our acquisition strategy;potential goodwill or intangible asset impairment;

 

dependence upon our key executives;

ii


continuing implementation of a newan enterprise resource planning information technology system;

 

our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;

 

potential environmental liabilities;

 

ii


risk associated with international sourcing;

 

litigation and product liability claims;

 

regulatory issues;

 

the impact of product recalls;

 

potential costs and risks associated with actual or anticipated cyber attacks;

 

the voting power associated with our Class B stock; and

 

potential dilution from issuance of authorized shares.

 

iii


MARKET, RANKING AND OTHER DATA

The data included in this Form 10-K regarding markets and ranking, including the size of certain markets and our position and the position of our competitors and products within these markets, are based on both independent industry publications, including Packaged Facts,The Freedonia Group Lawn & Garden Consumables July 2014; Freedonia Landscaping Products in the U.S. 2012; Mintel, Marketing to Pet Owners – U.S., 2012;August 2015; Packaged Facts U.S. Pet MarketingMarket Outlook 2012-2013;2015-2016; Packaged Facts Pet Treats and Chews in the U.S. June 2015; American Pet Products Association (APPA) National Pet Owners Survey 2011-2012;2015-2016; U.S. Census Bureau, and our estimates based on management’s knowledge and experience in the markets in which we operate. Our estimates have been based on information provided by customers, suppliers, trade and business organizations and other contacts in the markets in which we operate. We believe theseWhile we are not aware of any misstatements regarding our market and ranking data presented herein, our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to be accurate as ofchange based on various factors, including those discussed under the date ofheading “Risk factors” in this Form 10-K. However, thisThis information may prove to be inaccurate because of the method by which we obtained some of the data for our estimates or because this information cannot always be verified with complete certainty due to the limits on the availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties inherent in a survey of market size. As a result, you should be aware that market, ranking and other similar data included in this Form 10-K,herein, and estimates and beliefs based on that data, may not be reliable. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information contained herein.

 

iv


PART I

Item 1. Business

BUSINESS

Our Company

Central Garden & Pet Company (“Central”) is a leading innovator, marketer and producer, of quality branded products. We are oneproducts and distributor of the largest suppliersthird party products in the pet and lawn and garden supplies industries in the United States. The total pet food, treats and supplies industry isin 2014 was estimated by Packaged Facts to behave been approximately $30$49.2 billion in annual retail sales. We estimate the annual retail sales of the pet supplies and consumables and super premium pet food markets in the categories in which we participate to be approximately $15$28.1 billion. The total lawn and garden consumables and decorative products industry in the United States which includes equipment, supplies and services, is estimated to be approximately $21$22.0 billion in annual retail sales.sales, including fertilizer, pesticides, growing media, seeds, mulch, other consumables and decorative products. We estimate the annual retail sales of the lawn and garden suppliesconsumables and decorative products markets in the categories in which we participate to be approximately $6$12.0 billion. In addition, we participate in the pottery and seasonal décor markets.

Our pet supplies products include products for dogs and cats, including edible bones, premium healthy edible and non-edible chews, super premium dog and cat food and treats, toys, pet carriers, grooming supplies and other accessories; products for birds, small animals and specialty pets, including food, cages and habitats, toys, chews and related accessories; animal and household health and insect control products; products for fish, reptiles and other aquarium-based pets, including aquariums, furniture and lighting fixtures, pumps, filters, water conditioners, food and supplements, and information and knowledge resources; and products for horses and livestock. These products are sold under a number of brand namesthe brands including AdamsTM, Altosid, Aqueon®, Avoderm®, BioSpotBio Spot Active Care®TM, CoralifeCadet®, Farnam®, Four Paws®, Interpet, Kaytee®, Kent Marine®, Nylabone®, Oceanic Systems®, Pet Select®, Pre-Strike®, Pinnacle®, Super Pet®, TFHTM, Zilla® as well as a number of other brands including Altosid, Comfort Zone®, Coralife®, Interpet, Kent Marine®, Pet Select®, Super Pet®, and Zodiac®.

Our lawn and garden supplies products include proprietary and non-proprietary grass seed; wild bird feed, bird feeders, bird houses and other birding accessories; weed, grass, ant and other herbicide, insecticide and pesticide products; and decorative outdoor lifestyle and lighting products including pottery, trellises and other wood products and holiday lighting. These products are sold under a number of brand names includingthe brands AMDRO®, GKI/Bethlehem Lighting®, Grant’s®, Ironite®, Pennington®, and Sevin®, as well as a number of other brand names including Lilly Miller®, Matthews Four SeasonsTM, New England Pottery®, Norcal Pottery®, Pennington®, Over-N-Out®, Sevin®, Smart Seed® and The Rebels®.

In fiscal 2012,2015, our consolidated net sales were $1.7 billion, of which our Petpet segment, or Pet, accounted for approximately $931$895 million and our lawn and Gardengarden segment, or Garden, accounted for approximately $769$756 million. Fiscal 2012 included an extra week compared to fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012,2015, our income from operations before corporate expenses and eliminations of $67.5 million was $74$158.9 million, of which the Pet segment accounted for $88$98.8 million and the Garden segment accounted for $40 million, before corporate expenses and eliminations of $54$60.1 million. See Note 1819 to our consolidated financial statements for financial information about our two operating segments.

We were incorporated in Delaware in JuneMay 1992 as the successor to a California corporation that was formed in 1955. Our executive offices are located at 1340 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597, and our telephone number is (925) 948-4000. Our website iswww.central.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this annual report.

Recent Developments

Fiscal 2012 Operating Performance. Although we experiencedEarnings per fully diluted share increased sales$0.46 per share to $0.64 per share and our operating income increased 63% to $91.4 million as compared to fiscal 2014, due to increased earnings in both our segments. The Pet segment was impacted by a $7.3 million non-cash intangible asset impairment charge in fiscal 2012, rising input costs,2015. In fiscal 2014, the Garden segment was impacted by a changecharge related to the discontinuance of certain products introduced in sales mix, operational disruptions2013 and increased costs associated with our transformational change initiatives,a gain on the sale of manufacturing plant assets. The items impacting fiscal 2015 and unfavorable weather resulted2014 are excluded for purposes of the non-GAAP presentation elsewhere in increased expenses and continuing pressure on gross margins.

Financial summary:this Form 10-K.

 

Net sales for fiscal 20122015 increased $71.4$46.3 million, or 4%2.9%, to $1.7 billion.$1,650.7 million. Our Pet segment sales increased 9.3%5.8%, partially offset by a 1.0% decrease inand our Garden segment.segment sales decreased 0.4%.

 

Gross profit for fiscal 2015 increased $34.0 million, or 7.5%, to $488.0 million from $454.0 million in fiscal 2014. Gross margin decreased 10increased 130 basis points in fiscal 20122015 to 30.2%29.6%, from 30.3%28.3% in 2011.2014.

 

Selling, general & administrative expensesOur operating income increased $31.0$35.2 million, or 7.6%62.7%, to $439.7$91.4 million in fiscal 2012,2015, and increased as a percentage of net sales to 25.9%5.5% from 25.1%3.5%. On an adjusted basis, operating income increased $30.5 million, or 44.6%.

 

Net earnings for fiscal 2012 were $21.2income was $32.0 million, or $0.44$0.64 per share on a fully diluted basis, a decreasecompared to net income in fiscal 2014 of $7.1$8.8 million, and $0.06or $0.18 per share on a fully diluted basis. On an adjusted basis, comparednet income increased to $36.6 million, or $0.74 per share, in fiscal 2011.2015 from $16.4 million, or $0.33 per share, in fiscal 2014.

 

We generatedOur net cash flows fromprovided by operating activities of approximately $89.2was $87.4 million duringin fiscal 2012, an increase of approximately $38.22015, compared to $126.5 million fromin fiscal 2011. Our cash and short term investments at September 29, 2012 were approximately $71.2 million, compared with $29.9 million at September 24, 2011.2014.

RepurchaseLeadership

In July 2015, we amended the employment agreement of John R. Ranelli, our Chief Executive Officer. Under the amended agreement, Mr. Ranelli has agreed to continue as Chief Executive Officer until his planned retirement at the end of fiscal 2016 and to continue to consult for the Company Stock.– During fiscal 2012,for an additional four years. In order to facilitate an orderly transition, we repurchased $20.9 million ofplan to launch a search in the near future for our common stock which consisted of 0.7 million shares of our voting common stock (CENT)next Chief Executive Officer.

Our former Chief Financial Officer, Lori Varlas, resigned effective September 2, 2015 to accept a senior level position at an aggregate cost of approximately $5.6 million, or approximately $8.02 per share, and 1.9 million shares of our non-voting Class A common stock (CENTA) at an aggregate cost of approximately $15.3 million, or approximately $8.05 per share. During fiscal 2011, ouranother company. The Board of Directors authorized a new $100 million share repurchase program, under which approximately $52 million remains availablenamed David N. Chichester as Acting Chief Financial Officer through February 2016. Mr. Chichester has served for repurchases in fiscal 201313 years on Central’s Board and thereafter.

Transformational Change. – In fiscal 2012, we continuedas our Audit Committee financial expert. He brings significant financial management, accounting, disclosure, and risk assessment experience to the process of transformational change we embarked upon in fiscal 2011, consisting of a comprehensive series of organizational and operational initiatives intended to improve our sales and marketing, profitability and operational effectiveness. We expect to continue these initiatives over the next several years. The strategic objective of these initiatives is to transform the Company from a portfolio of separately run businesses into an integrated, multi-brand company. In connection with this change, we are strengthening our management team, reorganizing operating units, consolidating facilities, eliminating duplicative services, standardizing processes, training employees in new approaches and investing in systems, facilities and people. For example, in fiscal 2011, we began the process of combining our Garden and Pet supply chains as an integrated unit responsible for distribution, transportation, manufacturing, sourcing and sales and operations planning. In fiscal 2012, we began consolidating transactional processing in a newly created centralized shared services center in Boise, Idaho.Acting Chief Financial Officer role. We are in the process of movingpositioning our accounts payable, accounts receivablekey senior financial officers to assume Mr. Chichester’s responsibilities in an orderly fashion when he completes his tenure as Acting Chief Financial Officer in February 2016.

Our Chairman of the Board, Bill Brown, commenced a leave of absence in July as he continues to recover from injuries he sustained in an accident in his home earlier in the year. Jack Balousek, our Lead Independent Director, is acting as Interim non-executive Chairman until Mr. Brown returns.

IMS Trading Corp Acquisition

On July 31, 2015, we purchased substantially all of the assets of IMS Trading Corp. (“IMS”) for a purchase price of approximately $23 million. IMS was a manufacturer, importer and order management functionsdistributor of rawhide, natural dog treats and pet products throughout the United States and internationally. This acquisition is expected to this centralized service center. During fiscal 2012,complement our existing dog and cat business.

Debt Refinancing

In November 2015, we incurred approximately $12.1issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of additional expense6.125% senior notes due November 2023 (the “2023 Notes”). The 2023 Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by each of

our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries which are borrowers under or guarantors of our senior secured revolving credit facility. We used the net proceeds from the offering, together with available cash, to redeem our outstanding 8.25% senior subordinated notes due March 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) and pay fees and expenses related to transformation activities.

There can be no assurance thatthe offering. As a result of our redemption of the 2018 Notes, we will be able to successfully implement the transformational change initiatives or that we will be able to do so within the anticipated time period. During the process of implementation, we will be making substantial investmentsrecognize a charge in our business and will incur substantial transitional costs, which will adversely affect our operating results until the transformation process is complete.

Fiscal 2013.– Hurricane Sandy negatively impacted our northeastern businesses. While damage was minimal, some of our businesses experienced disruption which will impact ourfiscal 2016 first quarter 2013 results.of approximately $8.3 million related to the payment of the call premium, a one-time payment of overlapping interest expense for 30 days of approximately $2.8 million and a $3.2 million non-cash charge for the write-off of unamortized financing costs in interest expense. We expect our annual interest expense on the 2023 Notes going forward to be approximately $8.5 million less than under the 2018 Notes.

DMC Acquisition

On December 1, 2015, we purchased the pet bedding and certain other assets of National Consumers Outdoors Corp., formerly known as Dallas Manufacturing Company (“DMC”), for a cash purchase price of $61 million. This acquisition is expected to complement our existing dog and cat business.

Competitive Strengths

We believe we have the following competitive strengths, which serve as the foundation of our business strategy:

 

  

Market Leadership Positions Built on a Strong Brand Portfolio. We are one of the leaders in the premium branded U.S. pet supplies market and in the U.S. consumer lawn and garden supplies market. We have a diversified portfolio of brands, many of which we believe are among the leading brands in their respective U.S. market categories. The majority of our brands have been marketed and sold for more than 25 years.

 

  

History of Innovative New Products. We have a reputation for introducing innovativeProducts and high quality products.Customer Service. We continuously seek to introduce new products at a reasonable cost, both as complementary extensions of existing product lines and as new product categories. We have received 19 industry awards for our new pet products inOver the last three years, includingwe have received a number of awards for innovation, customer service and marketing. For innovation, the AmericanPet segment received best new aquatic product at Global Pet Expo 2015 for the Aqueon Jukebox and back-to-back Product of the Year awards in 2014 for the Adams Flea and Tick Home Spray and in 2013 for the Adams Smartshield innovation. For customer service, in 2013, we received awards for PetSmart Vendor of the Year in Canada for Specialty (Aquatics, Small Animal, Pet Bird), PETCO’s 2013 Best Business Award’s Silver SteviePerformance Award for Aqueon & Zilla brands, Wal*Mart’s Outdoor Living Supplier of the Year and Wal*Mart’s People Award for its home division. For marketing, in 2013, the National Agri-Marketing Association (NAMA) recognized our professional products group for outstanding marketing communications for the new product introduction of Centynal as well as a W3 Award, in the consumer products industryConsumer Goods category, for ourthe Adams Smart Shield Applicator in 2012.website.

 

  

Strong Relationships with Retailers. We have developed strong relationships with major and independent retailers, as well as e-commerce retailers through product innovation, premium brand names,brands, broad product offerings,private label programs, proprietary sales and logistics capabilities and a high level of customer service. Major retailers value the efficiency of dealing with suppliers with national scope and strong brands. TheseOur ability to meet their unique needs for packaging and point of sale displays provides us with a competitive advantage. Independent retailers value our high level of customer service and broad array of premium branded products. We believe these strengths have made us one of the largest pet supplies vendors to PetSmart, PETCO and Wal*Mart and among the largest lawn and garden supplies vendors to Wal*Mart, Home Depot and Lowe’s. In 2011, we were named Home Depot’s Partner of the Year in the Outdoor Garden Category and the Ace Hardware Lawn & Garden Vendor of the Year, and in 2012, we were named the Wal*Mart Home Division Replenishment Team of the Year. Our ability to service large retailers, to meet their unique needs for packaging and point of sale displays and to offer new innovative products provides us with a competitive advantage. Independent retailers value our high level of customer service and broad array of premium branded products. We areLowe’s, as well as a leading supplier to independent pet and garden supplies retailers in the United States.

 

  

Favorable Long-Term Industry Characteristics. TheWe believe the pet and lawn and garden supplies markets in the U.S. have grown and are expected to continue to grow over the long-term due to favorable demographic and leisure trends. The key demographics bolstering our markets are the growth rates in the number of children

under 18 and the number of adults over age 55. Households with children tend to own more pets, and adults over 55 are more likely to be “empty nesters” that keep pets as companions and have more disposable income and leisure time available for both pets and garden activities. According to the 2011-20122015-2016 APPA National Pet Owners Survey, the number of U.S. pet owners in recent years has reached record highs, with 7379.7 million households, or 62%65%, owning a pet.

 

  

Sales and Logistics Networks. We are a leading supplier to independent specialty retailers for the pet and lawn and garden supplies markets through our sales and logistics networks. We believe our sales and logistics networks give us a significant competitive advantage over other suppliers. These networks provide us with key access to independent pet specialty retail stores and retail lawn and garden customers that require two-step distribution for our branded products facilitating:

 

acquisition and maintenance of premium shelf placement;

 

prompt product replenishment;

 

customization of retailer programs;

 

quick responses to changing customer and retailer preferences;

 

rapid deployment and feedback for new products; and

 

immediate exposure for new internally developed and acquired brands.

We plan to continue to utilize our team of dedicated sales people and our sales and logistics networks to expand sales of our branded products.

Experienced and Incentivized Management Team. Our senior management team has significant experience in the pet and lawn and garden supplies industries. William E. Brown, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has over 30 years of industry experience. Mr. Brown also owns approximately 13% of our outstanding stock. Gus Halas, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Central Operating Companies, has led successful transformational change initiatives at a number of other companies in a variety of industries.

Business Strategy

Our objective is to increase market share, revenue, earnings and cash flow and profitability by enhancing our position as one of the leading companies in the U.S. pet supplies industry and lawn and garden supplies industry.industries. To achieve our objective, we plan to capitalize on our strengths and the favorable industry trends by implementing the following key elements of our business strategy:

 

  

Continue TransformationalBalanced Organizational Change. The strategic objective ofWe have adopted a balanced approach to improving profitability through a focus on increasing sales and improving margins, providing superior customer service and innovative new products while improving our transformational change initiatives isoperations and reducing costs. We expect to transformcontinue this balanced approach in the future and to continue to focus on profit, our company from a portfolio of separately run businesses into an integrated, multi-brand company, thereby eliminating inefficiencies and unnecessary costs for our business and enabling us to compete more effectively. In connection with this change, we are reorganizing operating units, consolidating facilities, developing a system of shared servicescustomers, and eliminating duplicative services, strengthening our management team, standardizing processes, training employees in new approaches and investing in systems, facilities and people.inefficiencies.

 

  

Build Existing Brands. With our broad product assortment, strong brand names, strong sell-through and innovative products and packaging, we believe we can further strengthen our relationships with existing and new retailers, as well as e-commerce retailers, to increase shelf space and sales. Under our master branding strategy, we are moving to consolidatehave consolidated certain brands and expandexpanded others. WeAt the same time, we are utilizing some ofdeveloping private label programs for key retailers to complement our strongestproprietary brands, to drive new productsstrengthen our relationships with key retailers and brand extensions as we did during fiscal 2012 with our Amdro brand which introduced a complete line of insecticides specially designed to combat ants, snails, slugs, roachesincrease sales and other common insect species that damage landscapes and infest homes.profits. We believe that the strength of our major customers provides us with a solid foundation for future growth. We intend to gain market share in the home centers, mass market, grocery, specialty pet store and independent channels. We intend to add new retailers through marketing and sales personnel dedicated to these channels, as well as our innovative product introductions and packaging. We will continue to focus on using our sales and logistics network to emphasize sales of our higher margin, proprietary brands and to use efficient supply chain capabilities that enable us to provide retailers with high service levels and consistent in-stock positions.

 

  

Continue New Product and Packaging Innovation. We will continue to build and leverage the strength of our leading brand names by introducing innovative new products and packaging, extending existing

product lines and entering new product categories. Our product strategy seeks to capitalize on fulfilling consumerfulfillingconsumer needs, leveraging our strong brand names, utilizing our established customer relationships and continuing our history of product innovation. We have also made investments in our corporate sales and marketing infrastructure in the areas of product development, category management and key account sales support.

 

  

Improve Margins.Profitability.We believe there are opportunities to improve our gross and operating marginsprofits through increasedincreasing sales of our higher margin, innovative branded products, timely price increasesacquiring new private label business and cost reductionsreducing and leveraging of our existing infrastructure. Since fiscal 2004,Although we focused more on achieving grossmargin gains in the past several years, we have continuedshifted our focus to consolidate ourconcentrate more on overall profitability than on any specific gross margin targets. We have undertaken a number of initiatives to lower the cost of production, and believe success in doing so will allow us to gain additional sales and logistics centers, made capital improvements and consolidated some ofincrease our manufacturing facilities to reduce costs and improve manufacturing efficiencies. We are accelerating this effort as part of our new transformational change initiatives. For example, we have reduced the number of sales and logistics warehouses from 34 in 2008 to 29 at the end of fiscal 2012 and expectprofitability.

further consolidations during fiscal 2013. Although gross margins improved from fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2010, they declined significantly in fiscal 2011 and remained flat in fiscal 2012 as we continued to experience the impact of the rising costs of raw materials and costs associated with our transformational change initiatives. We are working with our key retail partners to implement price increases on our products as we strive to strike the right balance between pricing and our goal to deliver value to the consumer.

 

  

Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We plan to continue to make selected strategic acquisitions of branded product companies that complement our existing brands and product offerings. Management has substantial experience in acquiring branded products companies. By leveraging our marketing, manufacturing and sales and logistics capabilities, we believe we can increase the sales and improve the operating efficiencies of acquired companies.the companies we acquire. We look for companies with the potential to have the top one or two brands in their respective categories. The characteristics we generally seek when evaluating target companies arewith strong brand names, high quality and innovative product offerings, an experienced management team and a history ofhistorical and projected organic earnings growth.

 

  

Reduce Our Investment In Working Capital. We believe there are opportunities to reduce our investment in working capital over the long term by focusing on specific balance sheet metrics. In particular, we believe that the improvement in our fill rates as a result of tighter linkage between our businesses and supply chain initiatives will enable us to substantially reduce our investment in inventory once they have been fully implemented.without compromising the level of the service we provide to our customers. During fiscal 2014, we reduced our inventory level from $391.9 million to $326.4 million while maintaining high fill rates. Our inventory level at the end of fiscal 2015 increased slightly to $335.9 million as a result of increased sales and acquisitions completed during the year.

Products – General

The following table indicates each class of similar products which represented approximately 10% or more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in the fiscal years presented (in millions).

 

Category

  2012   2011   2010   2015   2014   2013 

Pet supplies (excluding wild bird feed)

  $847.1    $773.1    $766.5    $827.7    $774.2    $807.4  

Garden controls and fertilizer products

   281.7     260.0     255.5     286.3     262.5     274.9  

Wild bird feed

   205.1     197.5     168.9     193.2     202.1     210.8  

Other garden supplies

   185.7     212.1     196.0     181.4     182.5     183.5  

Grass seed

   180.4     185.9     136.7     162.1     183.1     177.0  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,700.0    $1,628.6    $1,523.6    $1,650.7    $1,604.4    $1,653.6  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Pet Segment

Overview

We are one of the leading marketers and producers of premium branded pet supplies in the United States. In addition, our Pet segment operates one of the largest sales and logistics networknetworks in the industry strategically supporting itsour brands. In fiscal 2012,2015, the Pet segment accounted for $931$895 million of our consolidated net sales and $87$98.8 million of our consolidated income from operations before corporate expenses and eliminations.

Industry Background

According to the 2011-2012 APPASimmons Fall 2014 National Pet OwnersConsumer Survey, U.S. pet ownership is at its highest level, with 73 million households, or 62%, owning a pet. During the past decade, the number of pet-owningU.S. households increased 15%.with dogs or cats in 2014 declined to 51.1% from a previous high of 53.3% in the prior year, which is consistent with the 51 – 53% range since 2011.

The pet industry includes food, supplies, veterinarian care, and services and live animals. We operate primarily in the pet supplies segment of the industry. This segment includes: products for dogs and cats, including edible bones, premium healthy edible and non-edible chews, rawhide, toys, pet carriers, grooming supplies and other accessories; products for birds, small animals and specialty pets, including food,

cages and habitats, toys, chews, and related accessories; animal and household health and insect control products; products for fish, reptiles and other aquarium-based pets, including aquariums, furniture and lighting fixtures, pumps, filters, water conditioners and supplements, and information and knowledge resources; and products for horses and livestock. According to Mintel, U.S. retail sales ofPackaged Facts, the pet food and supplies in 2017 are expected to total approximately $35 billion, from approximately $28segment was $14.5 billion in 2010.revenue in 2014, up 2.5% from 2013. We also operate in the super premium category of dog and cat food and treats. Mintel estimates the total pet food market to be approximately $21 billion in 2017. We believe the pet food market is experiencing an upscale thrust, featuring products that are natural, functional and address specific dietary needs of animals, primarily dogs and cats. We estimate the current applicable market opportunity for our high-end, premium and super-premium dog and cat food and treats to be approximately $4 billion.

We believe this industry growth is due in significant part to favorable demographic and leisure trends, which we expect to continue, albeit potentially at a slower rate due to recessionary pressuresa lower rate of growth in the broader U.S. economy. The key demographics bolstering the U.S. pet supplies market are the growth rates in the number of children under 18 and the number of adults over age 55. According to 20102012 U.S. interim census data, approximately 40%41% of the population is 45 years or older. Households with children tend to own more pets, and adults over 55 are more likely to be “empty nesters,”nesters” who keep pets as companions and have more disposable income and leisure time available for pets. In addition, many pet supplies products (e.g., dog and cat food, dog chews, bird food, grooming supplies, pest control, etc.) are routinely consumed and replenished. For example, as many as 87% of dog owners and 67% of cat owners regularly purchase some type of treat.

The U.S. pet supplies market is highly fragmented with approximately 1,400 manufacturers, consisting primarily of small companies with limited product lines. The majority of these manufacturers do not have a captive sales and logistics network and must rely on us or other independent distributors to supply their products to regional pet specialty chains and independent retailers. According to Mintel,Packaged Facts, pet supplies sales are up 19 percentincreased 14.9% over the lastpast five years,years. Sales are expected to increase an additional 13% to $16.8 billion by 2019, indicating thatthe strength of this category has been able to weather the recession fairly well.category.

The pet food and supplies industry retail channel also remains fragmented, with approximately 7,6008,300 independent pet supply stores in the United States and only two national specialty retailers, PetSmart and PETCO. These two “pet superstores” have grown rapidly, and pet products have also become a growing category in mass merchandisers, discounters, grocery outlets and grocery outlets.the e-commerce channel. PetSmart and PETCO typically offer the broadest product selection with competitive prices and a growing array of pet services. Mass merchandisers, supermarkets and discounters have historically carried a limited product assortment that features primarily pet food, but we believe these retailers are devoting more shelf space to meet increased consumer demand for premium pet supplies. Independent pet stores typically have a relatively broad product selection and attempt to differentiate themselves by offering premier brands and knowledgeable service.

Proprietary Branded Pet Products

Our principal pet supplies categories are dog &and cat, aquatics, bird &and small animal, foodwild bird feed and animal health and nutrition products.

Dog & Cat.We are a leading marketerThe dog and producer ofcat category, featuring the brands Nylabone, Four Paws, Cadet®, TFH Publications, Pet Select, Pet Love and Mikki®, is an industry leader in manufacturing and marketing premium healthy edible and non-edible chews, interactive toys, super premium dog and cat food, toys, grooming supplies, pet carriers and other accessories, and information and knowledge resources featuring the brands Nylabone, Four Paws, TFH, Pet Select, Interpet, Pet Love and Mikki®. Nylabone has a strong history of developing innovative new products such as the NutriDent® Edible Dental Brush Chews, Toro and Lobo as well as numerous other award winning dog toys. Four Paws products include grooming supplies and toys,pet-care print and digital content.

Nylabone is made in the United States and has a strong history of developing innovative products such as NutriDent® Edible Dental Brush Chews, as well as numerous other award-winning dog toys and healthy chews.

Four Paws Products include industry leaders in grooming and waste management products under the Wee Wee and Magic Coat Brands.

TFH Publications is a leading producer andglobally recognized publisher of both pet books and magazines. an aquatics magazine.

Breeder’s Choice, featuring the Pinnacle®, AvoDerm®, Simply Natural® and Active Care® brands, is a manufacturer of super premium natural pet food and treats.

IMS is regarded by the industry as onea manufacturer and supplier of the highesta full-line of quality developersrawhide and manufacturers of super premiumother natural pet fooddog chews, and treats. Breeder’s Choice brands include Pinnacle®, Avoderm®, Simply Natural® and Active Care®.

Aquatics. We are a leading supplier of aquariums and related fixtures and furniture, water conditioners and supplements, sophisticated lighting systems and accessories featuring the brands Aqueon, Zilla, Oceanic Systems, Kent Marine, Coralife and Blagdon.

Small Animal & Wild Bird Feed. We are a leading marketer and producer of specialty pet food for birds,pet and wild birds and small animals, vitamins and nutritional supplements, bird and small animal cages, habitats, transportation devices, toys and other accessories designed for the small animal marketplace featuring the brands Kaytee®, Super Pet®, Critter Trail® and Canopy Scientific®. Kaytee is one of the largest producers of specialty bird feed.

Animal Health. We are a leading marketer and producer of flea, tick, mosquito and other insect control products produced by Wellmark International and sold primarily under the Zodiac,Bio Spot Active CareTM, Adams, Altosid, Pre Strike and Extinguish® brand names. Wellmark is the only domestic producer of (S)-Methoprene, which is an active ingredient to control mosquitoes, fleas, ticks, ants and mites in many professional and consumer insect control applications. We also sell (S)-Methoprene to manufacturers of other insect control products, including Frontline Plus. In addition, through our Farnam operations, we are a leading manufacturer and marketer of innovative health care products for horses, household pets and livestock.horses. Farnam’s portfolio of industry leading brands includes the Farnam umbrella brand, Equicare®, ComboCare ™, IverCare®, Bronco®, Super Mask® and Repel-XII, Endure® for horses, D-Worm ™, BioSpot, Horseshoer’s Secret® and ScratchexVetrolin® for household pets, and Adams ™ and Bite Free ™ insect controls for home and yard care..

Sales Network

Our domestic sales network exists primarily to promote both our proprietary brands and third party partner brands. It provides value-added service to approximately 4,0006,000 customers, the majority of which are independent specialty retail stores for our branded products.with fewer than 10 locations. This includes acquisition and maintenance of premium shelf placement, prompt product replenishment, customization of retailer programs, quick response to changing customer and retailer preferences, rapid deployment and feedback for new products and immediate exposure for acquired brands. The combination of brands in the network also sells many other manufacturers’ brands of pet supplies and combines these products with our branded products intosupplied in single shipments enablingenables our independent customers to dealwork with us on a cost effective basis to meet their pet supplies requirements. We also operate onea sales and logistics facility in the United Kingdom.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales strategy is multi-tiered and designed to capture maximum market share with retailers. Our customers include retailers, such as regional and national specialty pet stores, independent pet retailers, mass merchants, grocery and drug stores.stores, as well as the e-commerce channel. In addition, we also serve the professional market with insect control and health and wellness products tofor use by veterinarians, municipalities, farmers and equine product suppliers. PetSmart accounted for approximately 12%8% of our Pet segment’s net sales in both fiscal 2012 and2015, 10% in fiscal 2011,2014 and 11% in fiscal 2010.2013. PETCO is also a significant customer.

To optimize our product placement and visibility in retail stores, our focused sales resources are segmented as follows:

 

a sales organization operating by category and channel;

 

dedicated account teams servicing our largest customers;

 

a group of account managers focused on regional chains;

 

a geographic based group of territory managers dedicated to the independent retailer; and

 

a specialized group of account managers dedicated to the professional and equine markets.

These sales teams deliver our marketing strategy that is consumer, brand and channel driven. We provide value creation with a focus on innovation, product quality and performance, premium packaging, product positioning and consumer value. To execute with excellence, weWe collaborate closely with our customers to identify their needs, jointly develop strategies to meet those needs and deliver programs that include print, broadcast, direct mail and digital execution.

Competition

The pet supplies industry is highly competitive and has experienced considerable consolidation coupled with the emergence of the e-commerce channel in the last fiverecent years. Our branded pet products compete against national and regional branded products and private label products produced by various suppliers. Our largest competitors in most product categories are Spectrum Brands and Hartz Mountain. The Pet segment competes primarily on the basis of brand recognition, innovation, upscale packaging, quality and service. Our Pet segment’s sales and logistics operations compete with Animal Supply Co., Phillips Pet Food & Supplies and a number of smaller local and regional distributors, with competition based on product selection, price, value-added services and personal relationships.

Garden Segment

Overview

We are a leading company in the consumer lawn and garden market in the United States and offer both premium and value-oriented branded products. We market and produce a broad array of premium brands, including Pennington, The Rebels, AMDRO, Grant’s, Lilly Miller, Ironite, Sevin, Over-N-Out, Norcal Pottery, New England Pottery, GKI/Bethlehem Lighting and Matthews Four Seasons.Over-N-Out. We also produce value brands at lower prices, including numerous private label brands. In addition, our Garden segment operates a sales and logistics network that strategically supports its brands. In fiscal 2012,2015, the Garden segment accounted for $769$756 million of our consolidated net sales and $40$60.1 million of our consolidated income from operations before corporate expenses and eliminations.

Industry Background

We believe that gardening is one of the most popular leisure activities in the United States, although in recent years our gardenGarden segment has been adversely impacted by thefluctuations in input costs weather and global recessionary economic environment. Packaged Facts assertsweather. The Freedonia Group predicts that the economy has brought more homeowners into their yards.household participation in lawn and garden activities will rebound slightly through 2018. The key demographic bolstering our lawn and garden market is the growth rate in the number of adults over age 55 who arewhich is projected to increase from 88 million in 2015 to 99 million in 2020. This age group is more likely to be “empty nesters” and have more disposable income and leisure time available for garden activities. As the baby boom generation ages, this segment is expected to grow faster than the total population. According to 20102012 U.S. interim census data, approximately 40%41% of the population is 45 years or older. We believe that this demographic should increase the number of lawn and garden product users. With more people gardening in their yards and the potential trends of food gardening and organic gardening, we perceive this market as staying intact and showing slow positive growth. We estimate the retail sales of the lawn and garden supplies industry in the categories in which we participate to be approximately $6$12.0 billion. In addition, we participate in the pottery and seasonal décor markets.market. We believe that the industry will continue to grow, albeit potentially at a slower rate in the near term due to industry dynamics.

Lawn and garden products are sold to consumers through a number of distribution channels, including home centers, mass merchants, independent nurseries and hardware stores. Home and garden centers and mass merchants oftentypically carry one or twomultiple premium product lines or brands and one value brand.brands. Due to the rapid expansion and consolidation of mass merchants and home and garden centers in the last 15 years, the concentration of purchasing power for the lawn and garden category has increased dramatically. We expect the growth of home and garden centers, such as Home Depot and Lowe’s, and mass merchants, such as Wal*Mart, to continue to concentrate industry distribution.

Proprietary Branded Lawn and Garden Products

Our principal lawn and garden product lines are grass seed, wild bird feed, insect control products, lawn and garden care products, decorative outdoor patio products and Christmas products and lighting. Our Pennington brand is one of the largest in grass seed, pottery and wild bird feed, and our Amdro brand is a leading portfolio of fire ant baitcontrol products. We are also a leading marketer of indoor and outdoor pottery products through our Norcal Pottery and New England Pottery brands.

Grass Seed. We are a leading marketer, producer and producerdistributor of numerous mixtures and blends of cool and warm season turf grass for both the residential and professional markets, as well as forage and wild game seed mixtures. We sell these products under the Pennington Seed, Pennington, Penkoted® , Max-Q®, ProSelect ™, Tournament Quality CM, MasterTurf®, The Rebels and Smart Seed® brand names. We also produce numerous private label brands of grass seed. The Pennington grass seed manufacturing facilities are some of the largest and most modern seed coating and conditioning facilities in the industry. In fiscal 2012, Pennington Seed enhanced its Smart SeedTM and 1-Step Complete ™ in its premium grass seed line with a new proprietary mix of multiple fiber sources, polymers and biostimulants to ensure seeds stay in place, germinate and produce deeper, healthy roots to reinforce the benefits of these premium products. Smart Seed is a drought-tolerant grass seed product that develops strong, deep root systems and requires up to 30% less water compared to ordinary grass seed. 1-Step Complete is a pre-mixed combination of mulch, Smart Seed premium grass seed and fertilizer that grows thicker and requires less water to establish.

Wild Bird Products. We are a leading marketer, producer and producerdistributor of wild bird feed, bird feeders, bird houses and other birding accessories in the United States. These products are sold primarily under the Pennington brand name. OurMost of our wild bird feed is treated with Bird-Kote®, a nutritious coating made up of vegetable oil fortified with oil-soluble vitamins and elements needed by wild birds.

Fertilizers and Controls. We are a leading marketer, producer and distributor of lawn and garden weed, moss, insect and pest control products and soil supplements and stimulants. We sell these products under the Knockout®, StrikeAMDRO®, Lilly Miller, Alaska Fish FertilizerMoss Out®, Corry’s®, IMAGE®, Sevin, Over-N-Out, and RooToneRootboost®., Knockout®, Strike® brand names and the Eliminator private label for Wal*Mart. We are also a leading marketer of fire ant bait, sold primarily in the southern United States, under the AMDRO brand name. In addition, we market ant baits, animal repellents and garden aid products under the Grant’s brand name. We manufacture several lines of lawn and garden fertilizers and soil supplements, in granular and liquid form, under the Pennington, Alaska Fish Fertilizer®,, Pro Care, Green Care, Green Charm, Ironite and other private and controlled labels.

Outdoor & Seasonal Decor. We are a leading marketer and distributor of decorative indoor and outdoor pottery products in the United States. We sell theseThese products, sold under the Pennington Norcal Pottery and New England Pottery brand names whichname, include terra cotta, stoneware, ceramic and porcelain pots. We also market seasonal Christmas products and lighting under the brand name GKI/Bethlehem Lighting, and we manufacture a complete line of wooden garden products, including planters, barrel fountains, arbors and trellises that are sold under the Pennington brand name.

Sales Network

Our sales and logistics network exists primarily to promote our proprietary brands and provides us with key access to retail stores for our branded products, acquisition and maintenance of premium shelf placement, prompt product replenishment, customization of retailer programs, quick responses to changing customer and retailer preferences, rapid deployment and feedback for new products, immediate exposure for acquired brands and comprehensive and strategic information. The network also sells other manufacturers’ brands of lawn and garden supplies and combines these products with our branded products into single shipments enabling our customers to deal with us on a cost-effective basis to meet their lawn and garden supplies requirements.requirements.

Sales and Marketing

The marketing strategy for our premium products is focused on meeting consumer needs through product performance, innovation, quality, upscale packaging and retail shelf placement. The marketing strategy for our value products is focused on promotion of the quality and efficacy of our value brands at a lower cost relative to premium brands. Our customers include retailers, such as mass merchants, home improvement centers, independent lawn and garden nurseries, drug and grocery stores, and professional end users. Sales to Wal*Mart represented approximately 30%31%, 28%31% and 31%30%, sales to Lowe’s represented approximately 20%18%, 24%15% and 22%17%, and sales to Home Depot represented approximately 16%, 15%17% and 18%, of our Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively.

To maximize our product placement and visibility in retail stores, we market our products through the following four complementary strategies:

 

dedicated sales forces represent our combined brand groups;

 

retail sales and logistics network, which provides in-store training and merchandising for our customers, especially during the prime spring and summer seasons;

 

dedicated account-managers and sales teams located near and dedicated to serve several of our largest customers; and

 

selected independent distributors who sell our brands.

Our marketing department begins with the voice of the customer, initiates the product development process and develops our consumer and retailer support plans, including broadcast, print, internet advertising and other media.

Competition

The lawn and garden products industry is highly competitive. Our lawn and garden products compete against national and regional products and private label products produced by various suppliers. Our turf and forage grass seed products, fertilizers, pesticides and combination products compete principally against products marketed by The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (“Scotts”). Scotts’ dominant position in the lawn and garden industry is a significant competitive disadvantage for our similar garden products. In addition, Spectrum Brands is a strong competitor in yard and household insecticides. Our Garden segment competes primarily on the basis of its strong premium and value brands, quality, service, price and low cost manufacturing. Our Garden segment’s sales and logistics operations also compete with a large number of distributors, with competition based on price, service and personal relationships.

Supply ChainManufacturing

We operate one integrated supply chain responsible for manufacturing, logistics, purchasing and sales and operations planning for both our Pet and Garden segments.

Manufacturing

Central manufacturesmanufacture the majority of itsour branded products in 3231 manufacturing facilities, located primarily in the United States. In addition, certain of our proprietary branded products are manufactured by contract manufacturers. We have also entered into an exclusive arrangement with a third party to manufacture one of our registered active ingredients, (S)-Methoprene, the active ingredientfor use in ourthat third party’s flea and tick control products.

Purchasing

Central purchasesWe purchase most of itsour raw materials from a number of different suppliers. In addition, we purchase one of the raw materials used to manufacture (S)-Methoprene from a single source of supply. The Company

maintainsWe maintain an inventory of this raw material (in addition to our (S)-Methoprene inventory) to reduce the possibility of any interruption in the availability of (S)-Methoprene, but a prolonged delay in obtaining (S)-Methoprene or this raw material could result in a temporary delay in product shipments and have an adverse effect on our Pet Products’segment’s financial results.

The key ingredients in our fertilizer and insect and weed control products are commodity and specialty chemicals, including phosphates, urea, potash, herbicides, insecticides and fungicides.

The principal raw materials required for theour wild bird feed operations are bulk commodity grains, including millet, milo and sunflower seeds, which are generally purchased from large national commodity companies and local grain cooperatives. In order to ensure an adequate supply of grains and seed to satisfy expected production volume, Central enterswe enter into contracts to purchase a portion of itsour expected grain and seed requirements at future dates by fixing the quantity, and often the price, at the commitment date. Although we have never experienced a severe interruption of supply, we are exposed to price risk with respect to the portion of our supply which is not covered by contracts with a fixed price.

From the fourth quarter ofIn fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2008,2013, prices for some of our key raw material inputs for our bird feed grains increased substantially. In fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, grain costs declined due primarily to deflationary pressures impacting the broader economy. During fiscal 2011, prices for some of our key inputs increased substantially. In fiscal 2012, prices continued to increase from 2012 increases due in part to drought conditions throughout much of the United States. Although by the end of the year, prices began to decline for

certain commodities. In fiscal 2014, prices decreased substantially compared to fiscal 2013. Our weighted average cost per pound for our primary bird feed grains increaseddecreased approximately 11%32% for fiscal year 20122014 compared to fiscal 2011. Although we have been able2013, and also decreased slightly in fiscal year 2015 compared to negotiate some price increases withfiscal 2014. The decrease in commodity costs is reflected in decreased sale prices to our retailers, it is possible price increases may not fully offset rising costs in the future, resulting in margin erosion.retailers.

Logistics Network

Our distribution network consists of 28 facilities strategically placed across the United States and one facility in the United Kingdom to allow us to service both our mass market customers as well as our independent specialty retail stores for our branded products. This network also supports distribution of many other manufacturers’ brands and combines these products with our branded products into single shipments, enabling us to serve our customers in an effective and cost efficient manner.

Significant Customers

Wal*Mart, our largest customer, represented approximately 17%16%, 16%17% and 17%16% of our total company net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively, and represented approximately 30%, 28% and 31% of our Garden segment’s net sales in both fiscal 2012, 20112015 and 2010,2014, and 30% in fiscal 2013. Sales to Lowe’s represented approximately 8%, 7% and 8% of our total company net sales in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and represented approximately 18%, 15% and 17% of our Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Sales to Home Depot represented approximately 7% of our total company net sales in fiscal 2015 and 8% in both fiscal 2014 and 2013, and represented approximately 16%, 15%17% and 18% of our Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010, respectively. Sales to Lowe’s represented approximately 9%, 12% and 10% of our total company net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and represented approximately 20%, 24% and 22% of our Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010,2013, respectively. PetSmart represented approximately 12%8% of our Pet segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012 and2015, 10% in fiscal 2011,2014 and 11% of our Pet segment’s net sales in fiscal 2010.2013. PETCO is also a significant customer.

Patents and Other Proprietary Rights

Our branded products companies hold numerous patents in the United States and in other countries and have several patent applications pending. We consider the development of patents through creative research and the maintenance of an active patent program to be advantageous to our business, but we do not regard the holding of any particular patent as essential to our operations.

In addition to patents, we have numerous active ingredient registrations, end-use product registrations and trade secrets, including certain technology used in the Wellmark operations for the production of (S)-Methoprene, which has been licensed to us from Novartis. This license is perpetual but non-exclusive. In addition, we have developed certain improvements that are proprietary to usimprovements relating to the synthesis of (S)-Methoprene. The success of certain portions of our business, especially our Wellmarkanimal health operations, partly depends on our ability to continue to maintain trade secret information which has been licensed to us, and to keep both licensed and owned trade secret information confidential.

Along with patents, active ingredient registrations, end use product registrations and trade secrets, we own a number of trademarks, service marks, trade names and logotypes. Many of our trademarks are registered but some are not. We are not aware of any reason we cannot continue to use our trademarks, service marks and trade names in the way that we have been using them.

Employees

As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, we had approximately 3,6003,300 employees, of which approximately 3,4003,100 were full-time employees and 200 were temporary or part-time employees. We also hire substantial numbers of additional temporary employees for the peak lawn and garden shipping season of February through June to meet the increased demand experienced during the spring and summer months. The majority of our temporary

employees are paid on an hourly basis. NoneExcept for 47 employees at a facility in Puebla, Mexico, none of our employees areis represented by a labor union. We consider our relationships with our employees to be good.

Environmental and Regulatory Considerations

Many of the products that we manufacture or distribute are subject to local, state, federal and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental matters. Such regulations are often complex and are subject to change. In the United States, all pesticides must be registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), in addition to individual state and/or foreign agency registrations, before they can be sold. Fertilizer products are also subject to state Department of Agriculture registration and foreign labeling regulations. Grass seed is also subject to state, federal and foreign labeling regulations.

The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA), establishes a standard for food-use pesticides, which is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the cumulative effect of pesticide exposures. Under this Act, the EPA is evaluating the cumulative risks from dietary and non-dietary exposures to pesticides. The pesticides in our products, which are also used on foods, will be evaluated by the EPA as part of this non-dietary exposure risk assessment.

In addition, the use of certain pesticide and fertilizer products is regulated by various local, state, federal and foreign environmental and public health agencies. These regulations may include requirements that only certified or professional users apply the product or that certain products be used only on certain types of locations (such as “not for use on sod farms or golf courses”), may require users to post notices on properties to which products have been or will be applied, may require notification of individuals in the vicinity that products will be applied in the future or may ban the use of certain ingredients. We believe we are operating in substantial compliance with, or taking action aimed at ensuring compliance with, these laws and regulations.

Various federal, state and local laws, including the federal Food Safety Modernization Act, also regulate pet food products and give regulatory authorities the power to recall or require re-labeling of products. We believe we are in substantial compliance or are taking steps to ensure that we are in compliance with these provisions.

Various local, state, federal and foreign environmental laws also impose obligations on various entities to clean up contaminated properties or to pay for the cost of such remediation, often upon parties that did not actually cause the contamination. Accordingly, we may become liable, either contractually or by operation of

law, for remediation costs even if the contaminated property is not presently owned or operated by us, or if the contamination was caused by third parties during or prior to our ownership or operation of the property. With our extensive acquisition history, we have acquired a number of manufacturing and distribution facilities, and most of these facilities have not been subjected to Phase II environmental tests to determine whether they are contaminated.

Environmental regulations may affect us by restricting the manufacturing or use of our products or regulating their disposal. Regulatory or legislative changes may cause future increases in our operating costs or otherwise affect operations. Although we believe we are and have been in substantial compliance with such regulations and have strict internal guidelines on the handling and disposal of our products, there is no assurance that in the future we may not be adversely affected by such regulations or incur increased operating costs in complying with such regulations. However, neither the compliance with regulatory requirements nor our environmental procedures can ensure that we will not be subject to claims for personal injury, property damages or governmental enforcement.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of our executive officers as of November 30, 2012.December 1, 2015.

 

Name

  Age   

Position

John R. Ranelli

69President, Chief Executive Officer and acting President – Pet Segment

William E. Brown

   7174    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Janet M. BradyDavid N. Chichester

   5870    Senior Vice President, Human Resources

Gus Halas

61President andActing Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer of the Central Operating Companies

Paul Hibbert

43Senior Vice President, Supply Chain

Steven LaMonte

56Executive Vice President and President – Garden Segment

Frank Palantoni

58Executive Vice President and President – Pet Segment

Michael A. Reed

   6467    Executive Vice President

George Yuhas

   6063    General Counsel

Lori A. Varlas

50Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

John R. Ranelli. Mr. Ranelli has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2013. Since March 2013, Mr. Ranelli has also been our acting President – Pet Segment. From 2011 to 2012, Mr. Ranelli was President and CEO of Woolrich Inc., an outdoor clothing company. From 2008 to 2011, Mr. Ranelli was an advisor to a number of companies and private equity firms. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Ranelli was President and CEO of Mikasa Inc., a global dinnerware, crystal and home accessories company. From 1999 to 2006, Mr. Ranelli was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of FGX International, a global optical and jewelry company. Previously, he served in senior executive capacities with Stride Rite Corporation, Deckers Outdoor Corporation, TLC Beatrice and The Timberland Company. Mr. Ranelli is a director of Woolrich, Inc. and serves as its non-executive Chairman.

William E. Brown. Mr. Brown, who is currently on leave, has been our Chairman since 1980. SinceFrom 1980 to June 2003 and from October 2007 to February 2013, Mr. Brown has also served as our Chief Executive Officer, a position he previously held from 1980 to June 2003.Officer. From 1977 to 1980, Mr. Brown was Senior Vice President of the Vivitar Corporation with responsibility for Finance, Operations, and Research & Development. From 1972 to 1977, he was with McKesson Corporation where he was responsible for its 200-site data processing organization. Prior to joining McKesson Corporation, Mr. Brown spent the first 10 years of his business career at McCormick, Inc. in manufacturing, engineering and data processing.

Janet Brady.David N. Chichester. Ms. BradyMr. Chichester has been ourActing Chief Financial Officer since September 2015. As a Partner of Tatum, a Randstad company, he served as interim CFO or as a consultant for several companies from 2005 through 2015. Mr. Chichester served as Senior Vice President Human Resources since February 2011. Ms. Brady was an executive at the Clorox CompanyFinance Starbucks Corporation from 19762001 to 2003 and, in Tokyo, as Chief Financial Officer Starbucks Coffee Japan, Ltd. from 2003 to 2004. Mr. Chichester served as its Vice President, Human ResourcesChief Financial Officer at Red Roof Inns, Inc. from 19931996 to 2003.

Gus Halas. Mr. Halas has1999. Prior to these positions, he held senior management positions in finance at Integrated Health Services, Inc., Marriott Corporation and General Electric Credit Corporation, and served as Presidentan investment banker at Warburg Paribas Becker Incorporated and Chief Executive Officerin several roles at The First National Bank of Chicago. He has also been on the Central Operating Companies since April 2011. Mr. Halas was a consultant to the Company from 2009 until April 2011. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Halas was Chairman, President and CEOboard of T3 Energy Services. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officerdirectors of Clore Automotive and Marley Cooling Tower Company and held senior executive positions with a number of other companies including Ingersoll-Dresser Pump Company and Sulzer Industries. Mr. Halas is also a director of Triangle Petroleum Corporation, an energy exploration and production company.

Paul Hibbert. Mr. Hibbert has been Senior Vice President, Supply Chain since October 2011 and for the prior two years served as Vice President, Supply Chain Garden Products. In 2009, Mr. Hibbert served as a supply chain consultant for BioLab, Inc/Chemtura. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Hibbert was the Vice President Supply Chain for United Industries. From 2003 to 2007, he was the Director of Supply Chain with Biolab, Inc.

Steven LaMonte. Mr. LaMonte has been our Executive Vice President, President – Garden Segment since May 2012. From 2009 to May 2012, Mr. LaMonte served as VP Latin America & Asia Pacific Regions for Johnson & Johnson’s McNeil Laboratories division. From 2006 to 2009, Mr. LaMonte was Worldwide Vice President, RX-OTC Switch & Innovation at Johnson & Johnson. Mr. LaMonte previously held numerous leadership positions at Pfizer Consumer Healthcare, Schering-Plough, Nestle Foods and other consumer productsseveral companies.

Frank Palantoni. Mr. Palantoni has been our Executive Vice President, President – Pet Segment division since February 2011. From 2006 to 2011, Mr. Palantoni was chief executive officer of P3 Capital Management LLC, an advisory and private equity firm specializing in consumer goods acquisitions and product development. He previously served as president and chief executive officer of Prestige Brands, Inc. and as a senior executive of Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Gerber Products Company and Groupe Danone.

Michael A. Reed. Mr. Reed has been Executive Vice President since June 2000 and was President of the Garden Products division from October 2007 to May 2012. Mr. Reed served as President of the Pet Products division from 2003 to 2004. Previously, Mr. Reed served as President and CEO of PM Ag Products, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of global agri-business Tate & Lyle, PLC.

George Yuhas. Mr. Yuhas has been our General Counsel since March 2011. He previously served as2011 and our Secretary since September 2015. From 1984 to March 2011, he was a partner specializing in litigation at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP since 1984.LLP.

Lori A. Varlas.Ms. Varlas has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary since December 2010. From 2006 to 2010, Ms. Varlas served as Vice President Finance at Sun Microsystems. Prior to joining Sun, Ms. Varlas was Vice President of Finance at PeopleSoft and held a variety of senior finance positions from 1998 to 2005. Ms. Varlas also held positions at Chiron Corporation, Specialty Foods and Price Waterhouse.

Available Information

Our web site iswww.central.com. We make available free of charge, on or through our web site, our annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on our web site is not part of this report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors both in and out of our control, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

You should carefully consider the risks described below. In addition, the risks described below are not the only ones facing us. We have only described the risks we consider to be material. However, there may be additional risks that are viewed by us as not material at the present time or are not presently known to us. Conditions could change in the future, or new information may come to our attention that could impact our assessment of these risks.

If any of the events described below were to occur, our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. When we say below that something could or will

have a material adverse effect on us, we mean that it could or will have one or more of these effects. In any such case, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment in our company.

We are in the process of implementing a transformational change within our company, which could result in increased expenses over the next few years.

In fiscal 2012, we continued the process of transformational change that we embarked upon in fiscal 2011, consisting of a comprehensive series of organizational and operational initiatives intended to improve our sales and marketing, profitability and operational effectiveness. We expect to continue to implement these initiatives over the next several years. The strategic objective of these initiatives is to transform the Company from a portfolio of separately run businesses into an integrated, multi-brand company. In connection with this change, we are strengthening our management team, reorganizing operating units, consolidating facilities, developing a system of shared services and eliminating duplicative services, standardizing processes, training employees in new approaches and investing in systems, facilities and people.

During fiscal 2012, we closed nine distribution and manufacturing facilities, while opening and upgrading others, leaving us with a net reduction of five facilities for fiscal year 2012. The operational issues associated with the closures, along with other supply issues, resulted in execution disruptions that delayed fulfilling orders for some customers as we transitioned certain operational activities. These disruptions adversely affected our revenues and operating earnings. While we believe we have resolved these particular issues, we may experience other operational issues as we continue to implement our transformational initiatives. These operational issues could have a material adverse effect on our performance and financial results.

During fiscal 2012, we incurred approximately $12.1 million of costs related to our transformational change initiatives. We anticipate incurring substantial additional costs relating to the transformation in each of the next several years.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully execute the transformational change initiatives or that we will be able to do so within the anticipated time period. During the process of implementation we will be making substantial investments in our business and will incur substantial transitional costs. We anticipate that these investments and transitional costs will adversely affect our operating results until the transformation process is complete.

Our operating results and cash flow are susceptible to fluctuations.

We expect to continue to experience variability in our net sales, net income and cash flow on a quarterly basis. Factors that may contribute to this variability include:

 

seasonality and adverse weather conditions;

fluctuations in prices of commodity grains and other input costs;

 

seasonality and adverse weather conditions;

costs or operational problems arising from our transformational change initiatives;problems;

 

shifts in demand for lawn and garden and pet products;

 

changes in product mix, service levels, marketing and pricing by us and our competitors;

 

the effect of acquisitions, including the costs of acquisitions that are not completed;acquisitions; and

 

economic stability of and strength of our relationshiprelationships with retailers.

These fluctuations could negatively impact our business and the market price of our common stock.

Seeds and grains we use to produce bird feed and grass seed are commodity products subject to price volatility that has had, and could have, a negative impact on us.

Our financial results are partially dependent upon the cost of raw materials and our ability to pass along increases in these costs to our customers. In particular, our Pennington and Kaytee businesses are exposed to fluctuations in market prices for commodity seeds and grains used to produce bird feed. Historically, market prices for commodity seeds and grains have fluctuated in response to a number of factors, including changes in United States government farm support programs, changes in international agricultural and trading policies and weather conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons.

To mitigate our exposure to changes in market prices, we enter into purchase contracts for grains, bird feed and grass seed to cover a limited portion of our purchase requirements for a selling season. Since these contracts

cover only a portion of our purchase requirements, as market prices for such products increase, our cost of production increases as well. In contrast, if market prices for such products decrease, we may end up purchasing grains and seeds pursuant to the purchase contracts at prices above market.

In fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, prices for some of2013, our key crops increased substantially. Our weighted average cost per pound for our primary bird feed grains increased approximately 11% for fiscal year 201215% compared to fiscal 2011.2012. In fiscal 2014, our weighted average cost per pound for our primary bird feed grains decreased approximately 32% compared with fiscal year 2013. In fiscal 2015, our weighted average cost per pound for our primary bird feed grains decreased slightly from fiscal 2014. Although we have been able to negotiate some price increases in the past with our retailers, it is possible that price increases may not fully offset rising costs in the future, resulting in margin erosion. We can provide no assurance as to the timing or extent of our ability to implement additional price adjustments in the context of rising costs or in the event of increased costs in the future. Similarly, we can provide no assurance of our ability to retain pricing with our retailers in the context of declining costs. We also cannot predict to what extent price increases may negatively affect our sales volume. As retailers pass along price increases, consumers may shift to our lower margin bird feed, switch to competing products or reduce purchases of wild bird feed products.

Our success depends upon our retaining key personnel.

Our performance is substantially dependent upon the continued services of our senior management team. We have entered into an amendment to the employment agreement with John R. Ranelli, our President, Chief Executive Officer and acting President – Pet Segment which contemplates his retirement in September 2016, and plan to launch a search for his successor during fiscal 2016. William E. Brown, our Chairman of the Board, commenced a leave of absence in July as he continues to recover from injuries he sustained in an accident in his home earlier in the year. In addition, in September 2015, our Chief Financial Officer resigned, and our board of directors appointed David N. Chichester, a member of our board, as Acting Chief Financial Officer through February 2016. The loss of the services of these persons could have a material adverse effect on our business unless adequate replacements are found. Our future performance depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled employees, including a new Chief Executive Officer and new Chief Financial Officer. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our existing personnel or attract additional qualified employees in the future.

We are subject to significant risks associated with innovation, including the risk that our new product innovations will not produce sufficient sales to recoup our investment.

We believe that our future success will depend upon, in part, our ability to continue to improve our existing products through product innovation and to develop, market and produce new products. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in the introduction, marketing and production of any new products or product innovations, or that we will develop and introduce in a timely manner improvements to our existing products which satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop new products and introduce them successfully and in a timely manner could harm our ability to grow our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

During fiscal 2013, we introduced two new Garden products. Despite support from our retailers and substantial marketing spend, the new products did not sell through as expected, and we took an $11.2 million charge related to inventory and product and packaging changes at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 relating to the new products. Despite a concerted effort to improve consumer takeaway of the products through product, packaging and placement changes, as well as aggressive promotions, we continued to experience weak consumer sales of the products in their second season and late in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 major retailers indicated that they would not support the products going forward. Consequently, we made the decision to discontinue the two products at the end of the 2014 garden season. As a result, we recorded a $16.9 million charge to operating income in fiscal 2014, to write off the remaining inventory of these products and to account for product returns, promotional allowances and other costs related to the discontinuance of the products. We believe that the period of time to gain consumer acceptance of major innovations is longer in the garden industry than in many industries, which compounds the risks generally associated with major new product innovations.

A decline in consumers’ discretionary spending or a change in consumer preferences could reduce our sales and harm our business.

Our sales ultimately depend on consumer discretionary spending, which is influenced by factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions, the availability of discretionary income and credit, weather, consumer confidence and unemployment levels. For fiscal 2009 and 2010, we experienced declines in sales as the result of the economic downturn. Any material decline in the amount of consumer discretionary spending could reduce our sales and harm our business. Since substantially all of our sales are in the United States, a declining U.S. economy may have a greater impact on us than on our competitors, some of which have substantial international sales. These economic and market conditions, combined with continuing difficulties in the credit markets and the resulting pressures on liquidity, may also place a number of our key retail customers under financial stress, which would increase our credit risk and potential bad debt exposure.

The success of our business also depends in part on our ability to identify and respond to evolving trends in demographics and consumer preferences. For example, from fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2009, the demand for aquatics products declined significantly. In fiscal 2010 and 2011, the demand for aquatic products stabilized and in fiscal 2012 it increased. Similarly, in fiscal 2010, the demand for wild bird feed declined and in fiscal 2011, demand increased. Our failure to timely identify or effectively respond to changing consumer tastes, preferences, spending patterns and lawn and garden and pet care needs could adversely affect the demand for our products and our profitability.

Inflation, deflation, economic uncertainty and other adverse macro-economic conditions may harm our business.

Our revenues and margins are dependent on various economic factors, including rates of inflation or deflation, energy costs, consumer attitudes toward discretionary spending, currency fluctuations, and other

macro-economic factors which may impact levels of consumer spending. In 2009 and 2010, our business was negatively impacted by the downturn in the housing market and by the decline in consumer confidence, as well as other macro-economic factors. During the last two years, we have experienced a significant increase in raw material input costs. Although we increased prices for many of our products, our price increases did not fully offset the increases in our costs, and our margins and profitability suffered as a result. If we are unable to pass through rising input costs and raise the price of our products, or consumer confidence continues to weaken, we may experience gross margin declines.

Supply disruptions in pet birds and small animals may negatively impact our sales.

The federal government and many state governments have increased restrictions on the importation of pet birds and the supply of small animals. These restrictions have resulted in reduced availability of new pet birds and animals and thus reduced demand for pet bird and small animal food and supplies. If these restrictions become more severe, our future sales of these products would likely suffer, which would negatively impact our profitability. In addition, some countries have experienced outbreaks of avian flu. While the number of cases worldwide has declined, a significant outbreak in the United States would reduce demand for our pet and wild bird food and negatively impact our financial results.

Our lawn and garden sales are highly seasonal and subject to adverse weather.

Because our lawn and garden products are used primarily in the spring and summer, the Garden business is seasonal. In fiscal 2012,2015, approximately 66% of our Garden segment’s net sales and 59%58% of our total net sales occurred during our second and third fiscal quarters. Substantially all of the Garden segment’s operating income is generated in this period. Our working capital needs and our borrowings generally peak in our second fiscal quarter, because we are generating lower revenues while incurring expenses in preparation for the spring selling season. If cash on hand and borrowings under our credit facility are ever insufficient to meet our seasonal needs or if cash flow generated during the spring and summer is insufficient to repay our borrowings on a timely basis, this seasonality could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Because demand for lawn and garden products is significantly influenced by weather, particularly weekend weather during the peak gardening season, our results of operations and cash flow could also be adversely affected by certain weather patterns such as unseasonably cool or warm temperatures, heavy rains, water shortages or floods.

Rising energy prices could adversely affect our operating results.

During fiscal 2011 and 2012, energy prices increased substantially, which resulted in increased fuel costs for our businesses and increased raw materials costs for many of our branded products. Energy prices have significantly declined since then. Rising energy prices in the future could adversely affect consumer spending and demand for our products and increase our operating costs, both of which would reduce our sales and operating income.

We depend on a few customers for a significant portion of our business.

Wal*Mart, our largest customer, accounted for approximately 16% of our net sales in fiscal 2015, 17% of our net sales in fiscal 2012,2014 and 16% in fiscal 2011 and 17% in fiscal 2010.2013. Lowe’s accounted for approximately 9%8% of our net sales in fiscal 2012, 12%2015, 7% in fiscal 20112014 and 10%8% in fiscal 2010.2013. Home Depot accounted for approximately 7% of our net sales in fiscal 2015, 8% in fiscal 2014 and 8% in fiscal 2013. In addition, Home Depot, PetSmart and PETCO are also significant customers, although each accounted for less than 10% of our net sales and together with Wal*Mart, Lowe’s and Lowe’s,Home Depot, accounted for approximately 45%40% of our net sales in fiscal 2012and fiscal 2011, and 46%2015, 41% in fiscal 2010.2014 and 43% in fiscal 2013. The market shares of many of these key retailers have increased and may continue to increase in future years.

The loss of, or significant adverse change in, our relationship with any of these key retailers could cause our net sales, income from operations and cash flow to decline. The loss of, or reduction in, orders from any significant customer, losses arising from customer disputes regarding shipments, fees, merchandise condition or related matters, or our inability to collect accounts receivable from any major customer could reduce our income from operations and cash flow.

We may be adversely affected by trends in the retail industry.

With the growing trend towards retail trade consolidation, we are increasingly dependent upon key retailers whose leverage is growing. Our business may be negatively affected by changes in the policies of our retailers, such as inventory destocking, limitations on access to shelf space, price demands and other conditions. In addition, as a result of the desire of retailers continue to more closely manage inventory levels there is a growing trend among retailers toand make purchases on a “just-in-time” basis. This requires us to shorten our lead time for production in certain cases and to more closely anticipate demand, which could in the future require the carrying of additional inventories and an increase in our working capital and related financing requirements. This shift to “just-in-time” can also cause retailers to delay purchase orders, which can cause a shift in sales from quarter to quarter. Decisions to move in or out of a market category by leading retailers can also have a significant impact on our business.

A significant deterioration in the financial condition of one of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability and cash flow. We continually monitor and evaluate the credit status of our customers and attempt to adjust sales terms as appropriate. Despite these efforts, a bankruptcy filing or liquidation by a key customer could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition in the future.

We cannot be certain that our product innovations and marketing successes will continue.

We believe that our past performance has been based on, and our future success will depend upon, in part, our ability to continue to improve our existing products through product innovation and to develop, market and produce new products. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in the introduction, marketing and production of any new products or product innovations, or that we will develop and introduce in a timely manner innovations to our existing products which satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop new products and introduce them successfully and in a timely manner could harm our ability to grow our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Issues with products may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, withdrawals, replacements of products, regulatory actions by governmental authorities that could divert resources, affect business operations, decrease sales, increase costs, and put us at a competitive disadvantage, any of which could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We have experienced, and may in the future experience, issues with products that may lead to product liability, recalls, withdrawals, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities. For example, during 2012, we experienced four unrelated recalls relating to one batch of baby bird feed products, one batch of mice, rat and hamster feed, one batch of dog food and a line of Christmas tree bases. In 2012, we recorded approximately $4.9 million of costs related to these recalls. TheseProduct recalls or future recallsother governmental regulatory action directed at product sales could result in increased governmental scrutiny, reputational harm, reduced demand by consumers for our products, decreased willingness by retailer customers to purchase or provide marketing support for those products, absenceunavailability or increased

cost of insurance, or additional safety and testing requirements. Such results could divert development and management resources, adversely affect our business operations, decrease sales, increase legal fees and other costs, and put us at a competitive disadvantage compared to other manufacturers not affected by similar issues with products, any of which could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Competition in our industries may hinder our ability to execute our business strategy, increase our profitability or maintain relationships with existing customers.

We operate in highly competitive industries, which have experienced increased consolidation in recent years. We compete against numerous other companies, some of which are more established in their industries

and have substantially greater revenue and resources than we do. Our products compete against national and regional products and private label products produced by various suppliers. Our largest competitors in the Pet segment are Spectrum Brands and Hartz Mountain, and our largest competitors in the Garden segment are Scotts and Spectrum Brands.

To compete effectively, among other things, we must:

 

develop and grow brands with leading market positions;

 

grow market share;

 

maintain and expand our relationships with key retailers;

 

continually develop innovative new products that appeal to consumers;

 

implement effective marketing and sales promotion programs;

 

maintain strict quality standards;

 

deliver products on a reliable basis at competitive prices; and

 

effectively integrate acquired companies.

Competition could lead to lower sales volumes, price reductions, reduced profits, losses, or loss of market share. Our inability to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks.

We have completed numerous acquisitions and intend further growth through the acquisition of additional companies.

We are regularly engaged in acquisition discussions with a number ofother companies and anticipate that one or more potential acquisition opportunities, including those that would be material, may become available in the near future. If and when appropriate acquisition opportunities become available, we intend to pursue them actively. Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including:

 

failure of the acquired business to achieve expected results, as well as the potential impairment of the acquired assets if operating results decline after an acquisition;

 

diversion of management’s attention;

 

failure to retain key personnel of the acquired business;

 

additional financing, if necessary and available, which could increase leverage and costs, dilute equity, or both;

 

the potential negative effect on our financial statements from the increase in goodwill and other intangibles;

 

the high cost and expenses of identifying, negotiating and completing acquisitions; and

 

risks associated with unanticipated events or liabilities.

These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have faced, and expect to continue to face, intense competition for acquisition candidates, which may limit our ability to make acquisitions and may lead to higher acquisition prices. We cannot assure you that we

will be able to identify, acquire or manage profitably additional businesses or to integrate successfully any acquired businesses into our existing business without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial difficulties. In future acquisitions, we also could incur additional indebtedness or pay consideration in excess of fair value, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our success depends uponIf our retaining key personnel.goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets or other long-term assets become impaired, we will be required to record impairment charges, which may be significant.

Our future performance is substantially dependent uponA significant portion of our long-term assets consists of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded as a result of past acquisitions. We do not amortize goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, but rather review them for impairment on a periodic basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. We consider whether circumstances or conditions exist which suggest that the continued servicescarrying value of William E. Brown, our Chairmangoodwill and Chief Executive Officer, Gus Halas,other long-lived intangible assets might be impaired. If such circumstances or conditions exist, further steps are required to determine whether the President and Chief Executive Officercarrying value of each of the Central Operating Companies, and our other senior officers. Theindividual assets exceeds its fair value. If analysis indicates that an individual asset’s carrying value does exceed its fair value, we would record a loss equal to the excess of the servicesindividual asset’s carrying value over its fair value.

The steps required by GAAP entail significant amounts of judgment and subjectivity. Events and changes in circumstances that may indicate that there may be an impairment and that interim impairment testing is necessary include, but are not limited to: competitive conditions; the impact of the economic environment on our customer base and on broad market conditions that drive valuation considerations by market participants; our internal expectations with regard to future revenue growth and the assumptions we make when performing impairment reviews; a significant decrease in the market value of our assets; a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which our assets are used; a significant adverse change in the business climate that could affect our assets; and significant changes in the cash flows associated with an asset. As a result of such circumstances, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of these personsour goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets or other long-term assets is determined. Any such impairment charges could have a material adverse effect upon us. In addition,on our results of operations and financial condition.

During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, we performed evaluations of the fair value of our indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks. Our expected revenues were based on our future performance depends onoperating plan and market growth or decline estimates for future years. In fiscal 2015, we recognized a $7.3 million non-cash impairment charge related to certain indefinite-lived intangible assets in our ability to attract and retain skilled employees. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our existing personnel or attract additional qualified employeesPet Segment as a result of increased competition in the future.marketplace and an expected decline in the volume of sales. The fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeded the remaining $15.0 million carrying value at September 26, 2015. No impairment was indicated during our fiscal 2014 or 2013 analysis of our indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks.

Our goodwill is associated with one of the reporting units within our Pet segment. In connection with our annual goodwill impairment testing performed during fiscal 2015, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of our reporting segments exceeded their carrying value by more than 10%, and accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required. During fiscal 2014, the reporting unit’s operating income declined approximately 50% from the comparable fiscal 2013 period. In connection with our annual goodwill impairment testing performed during fiscal 2014, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of our reporting segments exceeded their carrying value by more than 10%, and accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required.

We are implementing a newcontinue to implement an enterprise resource planning information technology system.

In fiscal 2005, we began incurring costs associated with designing and implementing SAP, a new company-wide enterprise resource planning (ERP) software system with the objective of gradually migrating to the new system. Upon completion, thisThis new system will replace ourreplaces numerous existing accounting and financial reporting systems, most of which were obtained in connection with business acquisitions. To date, we have reduced the number of ERP systems from 26 to 7 and expect to further reduce the number of systems during fiscal 2013. We invested an additional $14.4 million in fiscal 2012 for implementation.7. Capital expenditures for our new enterprise resource planning software system for fiscal 20132016 and beyond will depend upon the pace of conversion for those remaining legacy systems. We accelerated the pace of our enterprise resource planning conversion in fiscal 2012. If the accelerated implementation is not executed successfully, thiswe could result inexperience business interruptions. If we do not complete the implementation of the project timely and successfully, we may experience, among other things, additional costs associated with completing this project and a delay in our ability to improve existing operations, support future growth and enable us to take advantage of new applications and technologies. All of this may also result in a distraction of management’s time, diverting their attention from our operations and strategy.

Our inability to protect our trademarks and any other proprietary rights may have a significant, negative impact on our business.

We consider our trademarks to be of significant importance in our business. Although we devote resources to the establishment and protection of our trademarks, we cannot assure you that the actions we have taken or will take in the future will be adequate to prevent violation of our trademarks and proprietary rights by others or prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as an alleged violation of their trademarks and proprietary rights. There can be no assurance that future litigation by or against us will not be necessary to enforce our trademarks or proprietary rights or to defend ourselves against claimed infringement or the rights of others. Any future litigation of this type could result in adverse determinations that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our inability to use our trademarks and other proprietary rights could also harm our business and sales through reduced demand for our products and reduced revenues.

Some of the products that we manufacture and distribute require governmental permits and also subject us to potential environmental liabilities.

Some of the products that we manufacture and distribute are subject to regulation by federal, state, foreign and local authorities. Environmental health and safety laws and regulations are often complex and are subject to change. Environmental health and safety laws and regulations may affect us by restricting the manufacture, sale

or use of our products or regulating their disposal. Regulatory or legislative changes may cause future increases in our operating costs or otherwise affect operations. There is no assurance that in the future we may not be adversely affected by such laws or regulations, incur increased operating costs in complying with such regulations or that we will not be subject to claims for personal injury, property damages or governmental enforcement. In addition, due to the nature of our operations and the frequently changing nature of environmental compliance standards and technology, we cannot predict with any certainty that future material capital expenditures will not be required.

In addition to operational standards, environmental laws also impose obligations on various entities to clean up contaminated properties or to pay for the cost of such remediation, often upon parties that did not actually cause the contamination. Accordingly, we may become liable, either contractually or by operation of law, for remediation costs even if the contaminated property is not presently owned or operated by us, or if the contamination was caused by third parties during or prior to our ownership or operation of the property. With our extensive acquisition history, we have acquired a number of manufacturing and distribution facilities. Given the nature of the past operations conducted by us and others at these properties, there can be no assurance that all potential instances of soil or groundwater contamination have been identified, even for those properties where an environmental site assessment has been conducted. Future events, such as changes in existing laws or policies or their enforcement, or the discovery of currently unknown contamination, may give rise to future remediation liabilities that may be material.

Our business is dependent upon our ability to continue to source products from China.

We outsource a significant amount of our manufacturing requirements to third party manufacturers located in China. This international sourcing subjects us to a number of risks, including: the impact on sourcing or manufacturing of public health and contamination risks in China; quality control issues; social and political disturbances and instability; export duties, import controls, tariffs, quotas and other trade barriers; shipping and transportation problems; and fluctuations in currency values. Because we rely on Chinese third-partythird party manufacturers for a substantial portion of our product needs, any disruption in our relationships with these manufacturers could adversely affect our operations.

The products that we manufacture and distribute could expose us to product liability claims.

Our business exposes us to potential product liability risks in the manufacture and distribution of certain of our products. Although we generally seek to insure against such risks, there can be no assurance that such coverage is adequate or that we will be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms. A successful product liability claim in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on us and could prevent us from obtaining adequate product liability insurance in the future on commercially reasonable terms.

Deterioration in operating results could prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the terms of our indebtedness or impact our ability to refinance our debt on favorable terms as it matures.

We have, and we will continue to have, a significant amount of indebtedness. As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, we had total indebtedness of approximately $449.8$400 million. This level of indebtedness and future borrowing needs could have material adverse consequences for our business, including:

 

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the terms of our indebtedness;

 

require us to dedicate a large portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other business activities;

 

increase our vulnerability to adverse industry conditions, including unfavorable weather conditions or continued commodity price increases;

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate;

 

restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting business opportunities;

 

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and

 

limit our ability to borrow additional funds at reasonable rates, if at all.

In addition, since a portion of our debt commitments bear interest at variable rates, an increase in interest rates or interest rate margins as defined under the credit agreement will create higher debt service requirements, which would adversely affect our cash flow.

We are subject to cyber security risks and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks.

Our business employs systems and websites that allow for the secure storage and transmission of proprietary or confidential information regarding our customers, employees, suppliers and others, including personal identification information. Security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation, and potential liability. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly-evolving types of cyber attacks. Attacks may be targeted at us, our customers and suppliers, or others who have entrusted us with information. Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third-partythird party experts and consultants. Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries, or other developments may result in the technology used by us to protect transaction or other data being breached or compromised. In addition, data and security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including

breach by us or by persons with whom we have commercial relationships that result in the unauthorized release of personal or confidential information. Any compromise or breach of our security could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our reputation.

We do not presently expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared nor paid any cash dividends on our common stock or Class A common stock and currently do not intend to do so. Provisions of our credit facility and the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes restrict our ability to pay cash dividends. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to limitations under applicable law and contractual restrictions, and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

We may issue additional shares of our common stock or Class A common stock that could dilute the value and market price of your stock.

We may decide or be required to issue, including upon the exercise of any outstanding stock options, or in connection with any acquisition made by us, additional shares of our common stock or Class A common stock that could dilute the value of your common stock or Class A common stock and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock or Class A common stock.

Our Chairman, through his holdings of our Class B common stock, could exerciseexercises effective control of the Company, which may discourage potential acquisitions of our business and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

Holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to the lesser of ten votes per share or 49% of the total votes cast, and each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time into one share of our common stock. Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share owned. Holders of our Class A common stock and Series B preferred stock have no voting rights, except as required by Delaware law.

As of November 30, 2012,2015, William E. Brown, our Chairman, beneficially owned 1,600,459 shares of our Class B common stock (out of a total of 1,652,262 outstanding shares), 1,418,063 shares of our common stock and 3,259,404 shares of our Class A common stock and thereby controlled approximately 55% of the voting power of our capital stock. Accordingly, except to the extent that a class vote of the common stock is required by applicable law, he can effectively control all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of our directors, and can exert substantial control over our management and policies. The disproportionate voting rights of our common stock and Class B common stock and Mr. Brown’s substantial holdings of Class B common stock could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and Class A common stock. Also, such disproportionate voting rights and Mr. Brown’s controlling interest may make us a less attractive target for a takeover than we otherwise might be, or render more difficult or discourage a merger proposal, tender offer or proxy contest, even if such actions were favored by our other stockholders, which could thereby deprive holders of common stock or Class A common stock of an opportunity to sell their shares for a “take-over” premium.

We have authorized the issuance of shares of common stock, Class A common stock and preferred stock, which may discourage potential acquisitions of our business and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and our Class A common stock.

Pursuant to our Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 80,000,000 shares of our common stock, 100,000,000 shares of our nonvoting Class A common stock and up to 1,000,000 additional shares of preferred stock without seeking the approval or consent of our stockholders, unless required by the NASDAQ Global Market. Although the issuance of the nonvoting Class A common stock would not dilute the voting rights of the existing stockholders, it couldwould have a dilutive effect on the economic interest of currently outstanding shares of common stock and Class B common stock similar to the dilutive effect of subsequent issuances of ordinary common stock. The issuance of the preferred

stock could, depending on the rights and privileges designated by the board with respect to any particular series, have a dilutive effect on the voting interests of the common stock and Class B common stock and the economic interests of our common stock, Class A common stock and Class B common stock. In addition, the disproportionate voting rights of our common stock, preferred stock, Class B common stock and Class A common stock, and the ability of the board to issue stock to persons friendly to current management, may make us a less attractive target for a takeover than we otherwise might be or render more difficult or discourage a merger proposal, tender offer or proxy contest, even if such actions were favored by our common stockholders, which could thereby deprive holders of common stock of an opportunity to sell their shares for a “take-over” premium.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We currently operate 3233 manufacturing facilities totaling approximately 3,354,0004.1 million square feet and 29 sales and logistics facilities totaling approximately 3,693,0003.5 million square feet. Most sales and logistics centers consist of office and warehouse space, and several large bays for loading and unloading. Each sales and logistics center provides warehouse, distribution, sales and support functions for its geographic area. Our executive offices are located in Walnut Creek, California.

The table below lists the Pet segment’s manufacturing and sales and logistics facilities. Numbers in parenthesisparentheses represent multiple locations.

 

Location

  

Type of Facility

  

Owned or Leased

Phoenix, AZ (2)

  Sales and Logistics  Owned

Irwindale, CA

  Manufacturing  Leased

Sacramento, CA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Santa Fe Springs, CA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Aurora, CO

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Tampa, FL

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Council Bluffs, IA

  Manufacturing  Owned

Elk Grove Village, IL

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Jamesburg, NJ

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Mahwah, NJ

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Neptune City, NJ

  Manufacturing  Owned

Neptune City, NJ

  Manufacturing  Leased

South Brunswick, NJ

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Wood-Ridge, NJ

ManufacturingLeased

Fairfield, OH

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Cressona, PA

  Manufacturing  Owned

Pottsville, PA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Athens, TX (2)

Manufacturing

Leased

Dallas, TX

  Manufacturing  Owned

Dallas, TX

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Algona, WA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Chilton, WI

  Manufacturing  Owned

Franklin, WI

  Manufacturing  Leased

Franklin, WI

  Manufacturing  Owned

Guangdong,Manitowoc, WI

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

ManufacturingLeased

Guangzhou, China

  Manufacturing  Leased

Atlixco, Puebla, Mexico

ManufacturingOwned

Dorking, Surrey, UK

  Manufacturing  Leased

Taunton, Somerset, UK

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

The table below lists the Garden segment’s manufacturing and sales and logistics facilities. Numbers in parenthesisparentheses represent multiple locations.

 

Location

  

Type of Facility

  

Owned or Leased

Cullman, AL

  Sales and Logistics  Owned

Cullman, AL

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Roll, AZ

  Manufacturing  Owned

Yuma, AZ

  Manufacturing  Leased

El Centro, CA

  Manufacturing  Owned

Ontario, CA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Sacramento, CA

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Longmont, CO

  Manufacturing  Owned

Covington, GA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Eatonton, GA

  Manufacturing  Owned

Eatonton, GA

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Madison, GA (3)(2)

  Manufacturing  Leased

Madison, GA (2)

  Manufacturing  Owned

Madison, GA

  Sales and LogisticsOwned

St. Charles, IL

Sales and LogisticsLeased

Ligonier, IN

Manufacturing  Owned

Taunton, MA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Laurel, MD

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Greenfield, MO (2)

  Manufacturing  Owned

Greenfield, MO

  Sales and Logistics  Owned

Neosho, MO

  Manufacturing  Owned

Charlotte, NC

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Sidney, NE

  Manufacturing  Owned

Fairfield, OH

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Peebles, OH (2)

ManufacturingOwned

Piketon, OH

ManufacturingLeased

Albany, OR

  Manufacturing  Owned

Albany, OR

  Sales and LogisticsManufacturing  LeasedOwned

Lebanon, OR

  Manufacturing  Owned

Portland, OR

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Columbia, SC

  Sales and Logistics  Owned

Grand Prairie, TX

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Kenbridge, VA

  Sales and Logistics  Leased

Northbend, WA

  Manufacturing  Leased

As part of our transformational change initiatives, weWe are reviewing the number, location and size of our manufacturing facilities and expect to make changes over time in order to optimize our manufacturing footprint. In addition, we are in the process of combining our garden and pet products operations in the same warehouses where practical and reducing the number of distribution centers.

We lease 1113 of our manufacturing facilities and 23 of our sales and logistics facilities. These leases generally expire between 20132016 and 2020.2021. Substantially all of the leases contain renewal provisions with automatic rent escalation clauses. The facilities we own are subject to major encumbrances under our principal credit facility. In addition to the facilities that are owned, our fixed assets are comprised primarily of machinery and equipment, trucks and warehousing, transportation and computer equipment.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We may from time to time become involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Currently, we are not a party to any legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock has beenis traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol CENT, sinceand our initial public offering in July 1993. Our Classclass A common stock has beenis traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol CENTA since February 2007.CENTA. Our Class B stock is not listed on any market and generally cannot be transferred unless converted to common stock on a one-for-one basis. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices for our common stock and our Class A common stock, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market, for each quarterly period during our fiscal years set forth below.

 

  Common Stock   Class A
Common Stock
   Common Stock   Class A
Common Stock
 
  High   Low   High   Low   High   Low   High   Low 

Fiscal 2011

        

Fiscal 2014

    

First Quarter

  $10.96    $8.88    $11.08    $9.01    $7.80    $6.16    $7.93    $6.18  

Second Quarter

   10.51     8.80     10.39     8.83     8.01     6.08     8.15     6.04  

Third Quarter

   11.06     8.71     10.95     9.01     9.58     7.40     9.58     7.64  

Fourth Quarter

   10.58     6.50     10.48     6.67     9.19     7.66     9.43     8.04  

Fiscal 2012

        

Fiscal 2015

    

First Quarter

  $9.24    $6.66    $9.44    $6.76    $8.85    $6.61    $9.47    $7.04  

Second Quarter

   9.42     7.99     10.12     8.21     10.41     8.45     11.24     9.10  

Third Quarter

   10.93     8.25     11.10     8.45     10.61     9.26     11.51     9.67  

Fourth Quarter

   12.61     9.05     13.27     9.40     16.43     9.19     17.00     10.08  

As of November 15, 2012,30, 2015, there were approximately 125104 holders of record of our common stock, approximately 207328 holders of record of our Class A nonvoting common stock and five5 holders of record of our Class B stock.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock, our Class A common stock or our Class B Stock. We currently intend to retain any earnings for use in our business and do not presently anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock, our Class A common or our Class B stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, our credit facility and senior subordinated notes restrict our ability to pay dividends. See Note 1011 to our fiscal 2012 consolidated financial statements.

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the percentage change of our cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock (“CENT”) for the period from September 29, 200725, 2010 to September 29, 201226, 2015 with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite (U.S.) Index and the Dow Jones Non-Durable Household Products Index, a peer group index consisting of approximately 30 manufacturers and distributors of household products.

The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not indicative of, or intended to forecast, the possible future performance of our Common Stock.

 

Total Return Analysis

 

  9/29/07   9/27/08   9/26/09   9/25/10   9/24/11   9/29/12   9/25/10   9/24/11   9/29/12   9/28/13   9/27/14   9/26/15 

Central Garden & Pet Company

   100.00     68.65     132.13     113.48     75.17     133.60     100.00     66.24     117.72     69.60     76.14     162.28  

NASDAQ Composite

   100.00     81.42     78.79     90.54     95.32     121.04     100.00     105.29     133.69     164.57     198.75     208.80  

Dow Jones US Nondurable Household Products

   100.00     99.54     87.12     96.07     99.16     115.77     100.00     103.21     120.50     138.89     158.37     146.19  

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table sets forth the repurchases of any equity securities during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 29, 201226, 2015 and the dollar amount of authorized share repurchases, remaining under our stock repurchase program.

 

Period

  Total Number
of Shares

(or Units)
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Units)
   Total Number of
Shares (or Units)

Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
   Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of

Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (1)
 

June 24, 2012 – July 28, 2012

   1,844 (2)  $11.01     —      $51,595,000  

July 29, 2012 – August 25, 2012

   34,929 (2)   11.05     —       0  

August 26, 2012 – September 29, 2012

   30,943 (2)   12.48     —       0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   67,716   $11.70     —      $51,595,000  

Period

  Total Number
of Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Unit)
   Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
   Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (1)
 

June 28, 2015 – August 1, 2015

   940 (2)  $11.38     0    $34,968,000  

August 2, 2015 – August 29, 2015

   1,227 (2)   11.54     0     34,968,000  

August 30, 2015 – September 26, 2015

   358 (2)   14.55     0     34,968,000  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total

   2,525   $11.91     0    $34,968,000  

 

(1)During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a new $100 million share repurchase program. The program has no expiration date and expires when the amount authorized has been used or the Board withdraws its authorization. The repurchase of shares may be limited by certain financial covenants in our credit facility that restrict our ability to repurchase our stock.
(2)Shares purchased during the period indicated represent withholding of a portion of shares to cover taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and the exercise of stock options.stock.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected statement of operations and balance sheet data as of and for the five fiscal years in the period ended September 29, 2012 has26, 2015 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.

 

 Fiscal Year Ended  Fiscal Year Ended 
 September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
 September 25,
2010
 September 26,
2009
 September 27,
2008
  September 26,
2015
 September 27,
2014
 September 28,
2013
 September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
 
 (in thousands, except per share amounts)  (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Statement of Operations Data:

     

Statement of Operations Data (1):

     

Net sales (1)

 $1,700,013   $1,628,652   $1,523,648   $1,614,300   $1,705,386   $1,650,737   $1,604,357   $1,653,633   $1,700,013   $1,628,652  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

  1,185,855    1,134,733    1,008,482    1,086,974    1,184,058    1,162,685    1,150,333    1,189,731    1,185,855    1,134,733  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

  514,158    493,919    515,166    527,326    521,328    488,052    454,024    463,902    514,158    493,919  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  439,737    408,744    394,092    401,340    415,978    389,345    397,811    416,038    439,737    408,744  

Goodwill and other impairments (2)

  —      —      12,000    —      429,764  

Intangible asset and goodwill impairments (2)

  7,272    —      7,709    —      —    
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  74,421    85,175    109,074    125,986    (324,414

Income from operations (3)

  91,435    56,213    40,155    74,421    85,175  

Interest expense, net

  (40,170  (37,748  (33,587  (22,061  (37,273  (39,898  (42,750  (42,970  (40,170  (37,748

Other income

  678    550    419    52    2,116  

Other income (expense)

  13    403    (677  678    550  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  34,929    47,977    75,906    103,977    (359,571  51,550    13,866    (3,492  34,929    47,977  

Income taxes (tax benefit)

  12,816    19,595    28,110    36,368    (93,069

Income tax expense (benefit)

  18,535    4,045    (2,592  12,816    19,595  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

  22,113    28,382    47,796    67,609    (266,502  33,015    9,821    (900  22,113    28,382  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

  940    59    1,963    1,661    833    1,044    1,017    1,029    940    59  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $21,173   $28,323   $45,833   $65,948   $(267,335

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet

 $31,971   $8,804   $(1,929 $21,173   $28,323  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company:

     

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Central Garden & Pet:

     

Basic

 $0.44   $0.50   $0.71   $0.95   $(3.76 $0.66   $0.18   $(0.04 $0.44   $0.50  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

 $0.44   $0.50   $0.70   $0.94   $(3.76 $0.64   $0.18   $(0.04 $0.44   $0.50  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average shares used in the computation of income (loss) per share (3):

     

Weighted average shares used in the computation of income (loss) per share:

     

Basic

  47,622    56,217    64,272    69,499    71,117    48,562    48,880    48,094    47,622    56,217  

Diluted (3)

  48,374    56,645    65,091    70,264    71,117  

Diluted

  49,638    49,397    48,094    48,374    56,645  

Other Data:

          

Depreciation and amortization

 $30,425   $28,566   $28,869   $29,155   $32,517   $33,703   $35,781   $32,968   $30,425   $28,566  

Capital expenditures

 $39,592   $31,563   $24,190   $16,505   $22,349   $22,030   $17,173   $25,172   $39,592   $31,563  

Cash from operating activities

 $89,169   $51,008   $135,229   $221,638   $115,028  

Cash provided (used) by operating activities

 $87,449   $126,467   $(28,282 $89,169   $51,008  

Cash used in investing activities

 $(44,477 $(56,237 $(41,266 $(20,542 $(15,406 $(49,854 $(35,181 $(25,122 $(44,477 $(56,237

Cash from (used in) financing activities

 $(8,575 $(73,997 $(88,167 $(142,011 $(93,935

Cash provided (used) by financing activities

 $(68,370 $(27,759 $20,309   $(8,575 $(73,997

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (4)

  1.84    2.23    3.20    5.36    —      2.27x    1.32x    —      1.84x    2.23x  

  September 29,
2012
   September 24,
2011
   September 25,
2010
   September 26,
2009
   September 27,
2008
   September 26,
2015
   September 27,
2014
   September 28,
2013
   September 29,
2012
   September 24,
2011
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                    

Cash and short term investments

  $71,180    $29,851    $106,780    $85,668    $26,929    $47,584    $88,666    $32,976    $71,180    $29,851  

Working capital

   445,299     410,655     433,705     427,243     450,704     476,916     498,454     490,325     445,299     410,655  

Total assets

   1,149,547     1,093,003     1,130,884     1,150,925     1,259,318     1,134,754     1,148,727     1,161,160     1,149,547     1,093,003  

Total debt

   449,814     435,609     400,271     408,085     523,147     400,139     450,239     472,587     449,814     435,609  

Equity

   464,883     456,782     532,143     547,335     511,425     506,380     486,453     470,024     464,883     456,782  

 

(1)Fiscal years 2008, 2009, 20102011, 2013, 2014 and 20112015 included 52 weeks. Fiscal year 2012 included 53 weeks.
(2)During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010,2015, we recognized a non-cash charge of $12.0$7.3 million related to the impairment of ancertain indefinite-lived intangible assetassets in our Pet segment. During fiscal 2008,2013, we recognized a non-cash chargescharge of $403$7.7 million related to goodwill impairments within our Pet segment and Garden segment and $27 million for impairmentsimpairment of long-lived assetsgoodwill in our Garden segment.
(3)The potential effects of stock awards are excludedDuring fiscal 2013, we recognized an $11.2 million charge related to certain products introduced in fiscal 2013 in our Garden segment. During fiscal 2014, we recognized a $16.9 million charge related to these products. We recognized a $4.9 million gain in fiscal 2014 from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2008, because their inclusion in a net loss period would be anti-dilutive.sale of manufacturing plant assets.
(4)For the purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest and after eliminating undistributed earnings of equity method investees and before fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense incurred, the portion of rental expense under operating leases deemed by management to be representative of the interest factor and amortization of deferred financing costs. For the fiscal year ended September 27, 2008,28, 2013, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by approximately $360.5$3.2 million, and the ratio for that fiscal year is not considered meaningful.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion of the financial results, liquidity and other key items related to our performance. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A – Risk Factors.”

Business Overview

Central Garden & Pet Company (“Central”) is a leading innovator, marketer and producer, of quality branded products. We are oneproducts and distributor of the largest suppliersthird party products in the pet and lawn and garden supplies industries in the United States. The total pet food, treats and supplies industry isin 2014 was estimated by Packaged Facts to behave been approximately $30$49.2 billion in annual retail sales. We estimate the annual retail sales of the pet supplies and super-premiumconsumables and super premium pet food markets in the categories in which we participate to be approximately $15$28.1 billion. The total lawn and garden consumables industry in the United States is estimated to be approximately $21$22.0 billion in annual retail sales.sales, including fertilizer, pesticides, growing media, seeds, mulch, other consumables and decorative products. We estimate the annual retail sales of the lawn and garden suppliesconsumables and decorative products markets in the categories in which we participate to be approximately $6$12.0 billion.

Our pet supplies products include products for dogs and cats, including edible bones, premium healthy edible and non-edible chews, super premium dog and cat food and treats, toys, pet carriers, grooming supplies and other accessories; products for birds, small animals and specialty pets, including food, cages and habitats, toys, chews and related accessories; animal and household health and insect control products; products for fish, reptiles and other aquarium-based pets, including aquariums, furniture and lighting fixtures, pumps, filters, water conditioners, food and supplements, and information and knowledge resources; and products for horses and livestock. These products are sold under a number of brand namesthe brands including Adams™AdamsTM, Altosid, Aqueon®, Avoderm®, BioSpotBio Spot Active Care®TM, CoralifeCadet®, Farnam®, Four Paws®, Interpet, Kaytee®, Kent Marine®, Nylabone®, Oceanic Systems®, Pet Select®, Pre Strike®, Pinnacle®, Super Pet®, TFHTM, Zilla® as well as a number of other brands including Altosid, Comfort Zone®, Coralife®, Interpet, Kent Marine®, Pet Select®, Super Pet®, and Zodiac®.

Our lawn and garden supplies products include proprietary and non-proprietary grass seed; wild bird feed, bird feeders, bird houses and other birding accessories; weed, grass, ant and other herbicide, insecticide and pesticide products; and decorative outdoor lifestyle and lighting products including pottery, trellises and other wood products and holiday lighting. These products are sold under a number of brand names including:the brands AMDRO®, GKI/Bethlehem Lighting®, Grant’s®, Ironite®, Pennington®, and Sevin®, as well as a number of other brand names including Lilly Miller®, Matthews Four SeasonsTM, New England Pottery®, Norcal Pottery®, Pennington®, Over-N-Out®, Sevin®, Smart Seed® and The Rebels®.

In fiscal 2012,2015, our consolidated net sales were $1.7 billion, of which our pet segment, or Pet, segment accounted for approximately $931$895 million and our garden segment, or Garden, segment accounted for approximately $769$756 million. Fiscal 2012 included an extra week as compared to fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, our branded product sales were approximately $1.4 billion, or approximately 84% of total sales, sales of other manufacturers’ products were approximately 16% of total sales, and our gross profit margins were 30.2%. In fiscal 2012,2015, our income from operations was $74 million, of which our Pet segment accounted for $88 million and our Garden segment accounted for $40 million, before corporate expenses and eliminations of $54$67.5 million was $158.9 million, of which the Pet segment accounted for $98.8 million and the Garden segment accounted for $60.1 million.

Recent DevelopmentsFiscal 2015 Financial Highlights

Earnings per fully diluted share increased $0.46 per share to $0.64 per share and our operating income increased 63% to $91.4 million as compared to fiscal 2014, due to increased earnings in both our segments. The Pet segment was impacted by a $7.3 million non-cash intangible asset impairment charge in fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2014, the Garden segment was impacted by a charge related to the discontinuance of certain products introduced

in 2013 and the gain on the sale of manufacturing plant assets. The items impacting fiscal 2015 and 2014 are excluded for purposes of the non-GAAP presentation elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Fiscal 2012 Operating Performance. Although we experienced increased sales in fiscal 2012, rising input costs, a change in sales mix, operational disruptions and increased costs associated with our transformational change initiatives, and unfavorable weather resulted in increased expenses and continuing pressure on gross margins.

Financial summary:

 

Net sales for fiscal 20122015 increased $71.4$46.3 million, or 4.4%2.9%, to $1.7 billion.$1,650.7 million. Our Pet segment sales increased 9.3%5.8%, partially offset by a 1.0% decrease inand our Garden segment.segment sales decreased 0.4%.

Gross profit for fiscal 2015 increased $34.0 million, or 7.5%, to $488.0 million from $454.0 million in fiscal 2014. Gross margin decreased 10increased 130 basis points in fiscal 20122015 to 30.2%29.6%, from 30.3%28.3% in 2011.2014.

 

Selling, general & administrative expensesOur operating income increased $31.0$35.2 million, or 7.6%62.7%, to $439.7$91.4 million in fiscal 2012,2015, and increased as a percentage of net sales to 25.9%5.5% from 25.1%3.5%. The increase was due primarily toOn an adjusted basis, operating income increased selling and delivery expense.$30.5 million, or 44.6%.

 

Net earnings for fiscal 2012 were $21.2income was $32.0 million, or $0.44$0.64 per share on a fully diluted basis, a decreasecompared to net income in fiscal 2014 of $7.1$8.8 million, and $0.06or $0.18 per share on a fully diluted basis. On an adjusted basis, comparednet income increased to $36.6 million, or $0.74 per share, in fiscal 2011.2015 from $16.4 million, or $0.33 per share, in fiscal 2014.

 

We generatedOur net cash flows fromprovided by operating activities of approximately $89.2was $87.4 million duringin fiscal 2012, an increase of approximately $38.22015, compared to $126.5 million fromin fiscal 2011. Our cash and short term investments at September 29, 2012 were approximately $71.2 million, compared with $29.9 million at September 24, 2011.2014.

Recent Developments

RepurchaseLeadership

In July 2015, we amended the employment agreement of John R. Ranelli, our Chief Executive Officer. Under the amended agreement, Mr. Ranelli has agreed to continue as Chief Executive Officer until his planned retirement at the end of fiscal 2016 and to continue to consult for the Company Stock.– During fiscal 2012,for an additional four years. In order to facilitate an orderly transition, we repurchased $20.9 million ofplan to launch a search in the near future for our common stock which consisted of 0.7 million shares of our voting common stock (CENT)next Chief Executive Officer.

Our former Chief Financial Officer, Lori Varlas, resigned effective September 2, 2015 to accept a senior level position at an aggregate cost of approximately $5.6 million, or approximately $8.02 per share, and 1.9 million shares of our non-voting Class A common stock (CENTA) at an aggregate cost of approximately $15.3 million, or approximately $8.05 per share. During fiscal 2011, ouranother company. The Board of Directors authorized a new $100 million share repurchase program, under which approximately $52 million remains availablenamed David N. Chichester as Acting Chief Financial Officer through February 2016. Mr. Chichester has served for repurchases in fiscal 201313 years on Central’s Board and thereafter.

Transformational Change. – In fiscal 2012, we continuedas our Audit Committee financial expert. He brings significant financial management, accounting, disclosure, and risk assessment experience to the process of transformational change we embarked upon in fiscal 2011, consisting of a comprehensive series of organizational and operational initiatives intended to improve our sales and marketing, profitability and operational effectiveness. We expect to continue these initiatives over the next several years. The strategic objective of these initiatives is to transform the Company from a portfolio of separately run businesses into an integrated, multi-brand company. In connection with this change, we are strengthening our management team, reorganizing operating units, consolidating facilities, eliminating duplicative services, standardizing processes, training employees in new approaches and investing in systems, facilities and people. For example, in fiscal 2011, we began the process of combining our Garden and Pet supply chains as an integrated unit responsible for distribution, transportation, manufacturing, sourcing and sales and operations planning. In fiscal 2012, we began consolidating transactional processing in a newly created centralized shared services center in Boise, Idaho.Acting Chief Financial Officer role. We are in the process of movingpositioning our accounts payable, accounts receivablekey senior financial officers to assume Mr. Chichester’s responsibilities in an orderly fashion when he completes his tenure as Acting Chief Financial Officer in February 2016.

Our Chairman of the Board, Bill Brown, commenced a leave of absence in July as he continues to recover from injuries he sustained in an accident in his home earlier in the year. Jack Balousek, our Lead Independent Director, is acting as Interim non-executive Chairman until Mr. Brown returns.

IMS Trading Corp. Acquisition

On July 31, 2015, we purchased substantially all of the assets of IMS Trading Corp. (“IMS”) for a purchase price of approximately $23 million. IMS was a manufacturer, importer and orderdistributor of rawhide, natural dog treats and pet products throughout the United States and internationally. This acquisition is expected to complement our existing dog and cat business.

Debt Refinancing

In November 2015, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due November 2023 (the “2023 Notes”). The 2023 Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by each of our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries which are borrowers under or guarantors of our senior

secured revolving credit facility. We used the net proceeds from the offering, together with available cash, to redeem our outstanding 8.25% senior subordinated notes due March 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) and pay fees and expenses related to the offering. As a result of our redemption of the 2018 Notes, we will recognize a charge in our fiscal 2016 first quarter of approximately $8.3 million related to the payment of the call premium, a one-time payment of overlapping interest expense for 30 days of approximately $2.8 million and a $3.2 million non-cash charge for the write-off of unamortized financing costs in interest expense. We expect our annual interest expense on the 2023 Notes going forward to be approximately $8.5 million less than under the 2018 Notes.

DMC Acquisition

On December 1, 2015, we purchased the pet bedding and certain other assets of National Consumers Outdoors Corp., formerly known as Dallas Manufacturing Company (“DMC”), for a cash purchase price of approximately $61 million. This acquisition is expected to complement our existing dog and cat business.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, management functionsbelieves that certain non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the impact of a non-cash intangible asset impairment charge in fiscal 2015, a garden charge in fiscal 2014, and the gain from the sale of manufacturing plant assets in fiscal 2014, may be useful in certain instances to this one centralizedprovide additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior operating periods that should be considered when assessing our ongoing performance. Additionally, we have provided a comparison of our free cash flow which can be used as a measure of our operating performance on page 42. Free cash flow does not represent cash available only for discretionary expenditures, since we have mandatory debt service center. requirements and other contractual and non-discretionary expenditures. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and other users of its financial statements, such as lenders. Management also uses these non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating our performance. While our management believes that non-GAAP measurements are useful supplemental information, such adjusted results are not intended to replace our GAAP financial results and should be read in conjunction with those GAAP results.

Pet Segment Intangible Asset Impairment Charge

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we recognized a non-cash charge in our Pet segment of $7.3 million related to the impairment of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets caused by increased competition and declining volume of sales.

Garden Segment Discontinued Product Charge

During fiscal 2012,2013, we incurred approximately $12.1introduced two new Garden products. Despite support from our retailers and substantial marketing spend, the new products did not sell through as expected, and we recorded an $11.2 million charge to operating income relating to the new products. Despite a concerted effort to improve consumer takeaway of additional expensethe products through product, packaging and placement changes, as well as aggressive promotions, we continued to experience weak consumer sales of the products in their second season. Late in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, major retailers indicated that they would not support the products going forward. Consequently, we made the decision to discontinue the two products at the end of the 2014 garden season. As a result, we recorded a $16.9 million charge (“garden charge”) to operating income in the quarter ended June 28, 2014 to write off the remaining inventory of these products and to account for product returns, promotional allowances and other costs related to transformation activities.the discontinuance of the products.

Gain on Sale of Manufacturing Plant Assets

There can be no assurance thatDuring fiscal 2014, we will be able to successfully implement the transformational change initiatives or that we will be able to do so within the anticipated time period. During the process of implementation, we will be making substantial investmentsrecorded a $4.9 million gain in our business and will incur substantial transitional costs, which will adversely affect our operating results untilGarden segment from the transformation process is complete.

Fiscal 2013.– Hurricane Sandy negatively impacted our northeastern businesses. While damage was minimal, somesale of our businesses experienced disruption which will impact our first quarter 2013 results.

Fiscal 2011 Reported Earnings and Significant Items.

Fiscal 2011 Operating Performance. Althoughmanufacturing plant assets related to a seasonal product we experienced increased sales in fiscal 2011, rising input costs, a change in sales mix dueintend to competitive pressures and unfavorable weather resulted in increased expenses and lower gross margins.

Financial summary:purchase rather than produce.

 

Net sales for fiscal 2011 increased $105 million, or 7%, to $1.6 billion.

   GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Year Ended September 26, 2015
 
       Fiscal 2015
     GAAP
  Intangible
    Impairment    
  Fiscal 2015
    As Adjusted    
 

Net sales

  $1,650,737   $—     $1,650,737  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

   1,162,685    —      1,162,685  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   488,052    —      488,052  

Selling, general and administrative expenses and impairment

   396,617    (7,272  389,345  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

  $91,435   $7,272   $98,707  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $31,971   $4,654   $36,625  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – Diluted

  $0.64    $0.74  

Weighted shares outstanding

   49,638     49,638  

Gross margin

   29.6   29.6

Selling, general and administrative expenses and impairment as a percentage of sales

   24.0   23.6

Operating margin

   5.5   6.0

 

Net earnings for fiscal 2011 were $28 million, or $0.50 per share on a diluted basis, a decrease of $18 million and $.0.20 per share on a diluted basis, compared to fiscal 2010.

   GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Year Ended September 27, 2014
 
   Fiscal 2014
GAAP
  Garden
Charge (A)
  Gain on Sale of
Plant Assets (B)
  Fiscal 2014
As Adjusted
 

Net sales

  $1,604,357   $7,035    —     $1,611,392  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

   1,150,333    (9,873  —      1,140,460  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   454,024    16,908     470,932  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   397,811    —      4,875    402,686  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

  $56,213   $16,908   $(4,875 $68,246  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $8,804   $10,652   $(3,071 $16,385  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – Diluted

  $0.18     $0.33  

Weighted shares outstanding

   49,397      49,397  

Gross margin

   28.3    29.2

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales

   24.8    25.0

Operating margin

   3.5    4.2

Gross margin decreased 350 basis points in fiscal 2011 to 30.3%, due primarily to rising raw material input costs.

   Non-GAAP Consolidated Comparative  Summary
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
 
             Fiscal 2015                       Fiscal 2014            

Adjusted net sales

  $1,650,737   $1,611,392  

Adjusted gross profit

  $488,052   $470,932  

Adjusted gross margin

   29.6  29.2

Adjusted selling, general and administrative expenses

  $389,345   $402,686  

Adjusted selling, general and administrative as a percentage of sales

   23.6  25.0

Adjusted income from operations

  $98,707   $68,246  

Adjusted operating margin

   6.0  4.2

Adjusted EPS – diluted

  $0.74   $0.33  

 

Selling, general & administrative expenses increased $14.6 million, or 3.7%, to $408.7 million in fiscal 2011, but decreased as a percentage of net sales to 25.1% from 25.9%.

   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 
Pet Segment:  Income from
Operations
   Operating
Margin
  Income from
Operations
   Operating
Margin
 

Fiscal year as reported (GAAP)

  $98,798     11.0 $88,070     10.4

Intangible asset impairment charge (A)

   7,272      —      
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

Fiscal year as adjusted

  $106,070     11.9 $88,070     10.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

(A)In fiscal 2015, we recognized a non-cash intangible asset impairment charge within our Pet segment.

We generated cash flows from operating activities of approximately $51.0 million during fiscal 2011 and had a cash balance of approximately $12.0 million at September 24, 2011.

Garden Segment  Fiscal 2015
Net Sales
   Fiscal 2014
Net Sales
 

Fiscal year as reported (GAAP)

  $756,188    $758,852  

Garden charge (B)

   —       7,035  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fiscal year as adjusted

  $756,188    $765,887  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Senior Credit Facility – On June 8, 2011, we amended our credit agreement dated June 25, 2010 to increase the aggregate principal borrowing amount from $275 million to $375 million, extend the maturity date to June 8, 2016, and reduce the interest rates, commitment fees and interest coverage requirements.

   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 
   Income from
Operations
   Operating
Margin
  Income from
Operations
  Operating
Margin
 

Fiscal year as reported (GAAP)

  $60,145     8.0 $41,020    5.4

Garden charge (B)

   —        16,908   

Gain on sale of plant assets (C)

   —        (4,875 
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Fiscal year as adjusted

  $60,145     8.0 $53,053    6.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

(B)The garden charges reflect the impact of a Garden segment charge in fiscal 2014 related to the discontinuance of certain products introduced in 2013.
(C)In fiscal 2014, we recognized a gain from the sale of manufacturing plant assets related to a product the Garden segment will now purchase rather than produce.

Repurchase of Company Stock.– During fiscal 2011, we repurchased $108.7 million of our common stock which consisted of 3.3 million shares of our voting common stock (CENT) at an aggregate cost of approximately $30.2 million, or approximately $9.10 per share and 8.6 million shares of our non-voting Class A common stock (CENTA) at an aggregate cost of approximately $78.5 million, or approximately $9.08 per share.

Results of Operations (GAAP)

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the relative percentages that certain income and expense items bear to net sales:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
 September 25,
2010
   September 26,
2015
 September 27,
2014
 September 28,
2013
 

Net sales

   100.0  100.0  100.0   100.0  100.0  100.0

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

   69.8    69.7    66.2     70.4    71.7    71.9  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   30.2    30.3    33.8     29.6    28.3    28.1  

Selling, general and administrative

   25.9    25.1    25.9     23.6    24.8    25.2  

Intangible asset impairments

   —      —      0.8  

Intangible asset and goodwill impairment

   0.5    —      0.5  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   4.3    5.2    7.1     5.5    3.5    2.4  

Interest expense, net

   (2.4  (2.3  (2.2   (2.4  (2.7  (2.6

Other income

   0.1    —      —       —      —      —    

Income taxes

   (0.7  (1.2  (1.8   1.1    0.3    (0.2

Noncontrolling interest

   (0.1  —      (0.1   0.1    0.1    0.1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

   1.2  1.7  3.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

   1.9  0.5  (0.1)% 

Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 20112014

Net Sales

Net sales for fiscal 20122015 increased $71.4$46.3 million, or 4.4 %,2.9%, to $1,700.0$1650.7 million from $1,628.6$1604.4 million in fiscal 2011.2014. Our branded product sales increased $10.3 million, and sales of other manufacturers’ products increased $36.0 million. Branded product sales include products we produce under Central brand names and products we produce under third party brands. Sales of our branded products represented 79.7% of our total sales in fiscal 2015 compared with 81.3% in fiscal 2014. Private label sales represented less than 10% of our consolidated net sales.

The following table indicates each class of similar products which represented approximately 10% or more of our consolidated net sales in the fiscal years presented (in millions):

Category

  2015   2014   2013 

Pet supplies (excluding wild bird feed)

  $827.7    $774.2    $807.4  

Garden controls and fertilizers

   286.3     262.5     274.9  

Wild bird feed

   193.2     202.1     210.8  

Other garden supplies

   181.4     182.5     183.5  

Grass seed

   162.1     183.1     177.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,650.7    $1,604.4    $1,653.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our Pet segment’s net sales for fiscal 2015 increased $49.0 million, or 5.8%, to $894.5 million from $845.5 million in fiscal 2014. Pet branded product sales increased $25.3 million from fiscal 2014 due principally to a $20.7 million increase in our animal health category due primarily to growth in active ingredient sales and our Envincio acquisition in the prior year. Also, our dog and cat category net sales increased approximately $12.5 million due primarily to our fourth quarter fiscal 2015 IMS acquisition. Collectively, the acquisition of IMS in fiscal 2015 and Envincio in fiscal 2014 contributed $17.3 million of the $25.3 million increase in our Pet branded product sales in fiscal 2015. These increases were partially offset by a $4.6 million price driven decrease in wild bird feed. Sales of other manufacturers’ products increased approximately $23.7 million in fiscal 2015 benefitting from expanded distribution.

Our Garden segment’s net sales for fiscal 2015 decreased $2.7 million, or 0.4%, to $756.2 million from $758.9 million in fiscal 2014. Garden branded product sales decreased $15.0 million due primarily to decreases of $21.0 million in grass seed and $11.1 million in Décor. Grass seed sales declined due primarily to weather related lower volumes and the impact of the strong dollar on export sales. Lower volumes in Décor were due primarily to higher promotional sales in the prior year along with an unfavorable change in product mix due to lost distribution. These declines were partially offset by a $23.8 million increase in our controls and fertilizers category. The increase in controls and fertilizers was primarily volume related and reflects a $7.0 million charge to sales in the prior year for the impact on sales for two discontinued garden products. Excluding the $7.0 million charge in the prior year, controls and fertilizer sales increased $16.8 million. Sales of other manufacturers’ products increased approximately $12.3 million compared to fiscal 2014 due primarily to increased distribution to existing customers.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for fiscal 2015 increased $34.0 million, or 7.5%, to $488.0 million from $454.0 million in fiscal 2014. Gross margin increased to 29.6% in fiscal 2015 from 28.3% in fiscal 2014, with improvement in both our Garden and Pet segments. Gross profit for fiscal 2015 increased $17.1 million, or 3.6%, from adjusted gross profit of $470.9 million in fiscal 2014, which was impacted by the $16.9 million prior year garden charge. Gross margin for fiscal 2015 increased to 29.6% from the adjusted gross margin of 29.2% for fiscal 2014.

In the Pet segment, gross profit increased in fiscal 2015 due to a $49.0 million increase in sales and an improved gross margin. The improvement in gross profit was due primarily to increased sales in our animal health category, which includes our professional business, and our dog and cat category. Because our animal health sales tend to be higher margin, the animal health category’s increased sales had a positive impact on both our product mix and our gross margin. Gross margin also improved in our dog and cat category, although the improvement was partially offset by the lower margin of the increased sales.

In the Garden segment, gross profit increased in fiscal 2015 due to an improved gross margin which was partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in sales. The Garden segment gross profit and gross margin were impacted in fiscal 2014 by the garden charge. After adjusting for the fiscal 2014 garden charge, the gross margin in the Garden segment was the same in both fiscal years 2015 and 2014. Within the Garden segment, the garden controls and fertilizer gross profit improved, even after adjusting for the prior year garden charge, primarily due to increased volumes and favorable product mix. These improvements were partially offset by a decreased gross margin in Décor that, in addition to the decrease in sales, was also impacted in fiscal 2015 by an increase in excess and obsolete inventories.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $8.5 million, or 2.1%, from $397.8 million in fiscal 2014 to $389.3 million in fiscal 2015. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 24.8% in fiscal 2014 to 23.6% in fiscal 2015. Excluding the gain on the sale of plant assets in fiscal 2014, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $13.4 million from fiscal 2014, and the expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 25.0% in fiscal 2014. The change in selling, general and administrative expenses, discussed further below, was due primarily to decreased selling and delivery expense. Corporate expenses are included within administrative expense and relate to the costs of unallocated executive, administrative, finance, legal, human resource, and information technology functions.

Selling and delivery expense decreased $6.2 million, or 2.9%, from $216.4 million in fiscal 2014 to $210.2 million in fiscal 2015 and as a percentage of net sales decreased from 13.5% in fiscal 2014 to 12.7% in fiscal 2015. The decrease was due primarily to decreased marketing expenditures and headcount reductions in our Garden segment.

Warehouse and administrative expense decreased $2.3 million, or 1.3%, from $181.4 million in fiscal 2014 to $179.1 million in fiscal 2015. A $5.9 million decrease in corporate costs was partially offset by increased costs in both our operating segments. Corporate administrative expense decreased due primarily to the non-recurrence of a $5.9 million long-lived software charge in fiscal 2014. Increased costs in our operating segments were due primarily to the non-recurrence of a $4.9 million gain recorded in fiscal 2014 in our Garden segment from the sale of plant assets and increased payroll related and third party provider costs in our Pet segment.

Impairment

We evaluate long-lived assets, including amortizable and indefinite-lived intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Additionally, we evaluate indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis. In fiscal 2015, we recognized a non-cash $7.3 million impairment charge in our Pet segment related to certain indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of increased competition and an expected decline in the volume of sales. The fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeded the remaining $15.0 million carrying value at September 26, 2015.

Operating Income

Operating income increased $35.2 million in fiscal 2015, or 62.7%, to $91.4 million from $56.2 million in fiscal 2014. Increased sales of $46.3 million, a 130 basis point gross margin improvement and an $8.5 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs all contributed to the increase in operating income. Partially offsetting these improvements was a $7.3 million intangible asset impairment charge. Operating margin was 5.5% for fiscal 2015 and 3.5% for fiscal 2014. Adjusting for the current year intangible asset impairment charge in our Pet segment and for the prior year garden charge and the gain on the sale of plant assets in our Garden segment, operating income increased $30.5 million to $98.7 million in fiscal 2015 from $68.2 million in fiscal 2014. Adjusted operating margin improved to 6.0% from 4.2% in fiscal 2014.

Pet operating income increased $10.7 million, or 12.2%, to $98.8 million for fiscal 2015 from $88.1 million for fiscal 2014. The increase was due primarily to increased sales and improved gross margin, which were partially offset by an intangible impairment charge and a slight increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Pet operating margin increased to 11.0% for fiscal 2015 from 10.4% for fiscal 2014. Adjusting for the current year intangible asset impairment charge, fiscal 2015 operating income was $106.1 million and the operating margin was 11.9%.

Garden operating income increased $19.1 million, or 46.6%, to $60.1 million for fiscal 2015 from $41.0 million for fiscal 2014. Garden operating margin increased to 8.0% for fiscal 2015 from 5.4% for fiscal 2014. Adjusting the prior year for the garden charge and the gain on the sale of plant assets, Garden operating income increased $7.1 million from $53.0 million in fiscal 2014 and the operating margin increased from 6.9% to 8.0%. The adjusted Garden operating income increase of $7.1 million was due to a $44.4decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by lower net sales as adjusted gross margin remained unchanged for both fiscal years.

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense decreased $2.9 million, or 3.2%6.7%, increasefrom $42.8 million in fiscal 2014 to $39.9 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease was due to lower interest expense due primarily to lower average debt outstanding during fiscal 2015 primarily as a result of the redemption of $50 million of our 2018 notes in March 2015 partially offset by the related write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and a call premium of $1.6 million. Debt outstanding on September 26, 2015 was $400.1 million compared to $450.2 million as of September 27, 2014.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) is comprised of income from investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, foreign currency exchange gains and losses, and realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivative contracts used to economically hedge anticipated commodity purchases for use in our products. Other income decreased $0.4 million from fiscal 2014. The decrease was primarily due to equity method losses from the two newly formed entities we invested in during our second quarter of fiscal 2015.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 36.0% for fiscal 2015 compared to 29.2% for fiscal 2014. The increased effective income tax rate in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 was due primarily to the removal of valuation allowances on international deferred tax assets in fiscal 2014.

Fiscal 2014 Compared to Fiscal 2013

Net Sales

Net sales for fiscal 2014 decreased $49.2 million, or 3.0%, to $1,604.4 million from $1,653.6 million in fiscal 2013. Our branded product sales and a $27.0decreased $70.7 million, or 10.7%, increase in theand sales of other manufacturers’ products.products increased $21.5 million. Branded product sales include products we manufacture under Central brand names and products we manufacture under third-partythird party brands. Sales of our branded products represented 83.5%81.3% of our total sales in fiscal 2012. In addition,2014 compared with 83.2% in fiscal 2012 included an extra week as compared to fiscal 2011.2013.

The following table indicates each class of similar products which represented approximately 10% or more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in the fiscal years presented (in millions):

 

Category

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Pet supplies (excluding wild bird feed)

  $847.1    $773.1    $766.5    $774.2    $807.4    $847.1  

Controls and fertilizers

   281.7     260.0     255.5  

Garden controls and fertilizers

   262.5     274.9     281.7  

Wild bird feed

   205.1     197.5     168.9     202.1     210.8     205.1  

Other garden supplies

   185.7     212.1     196.0     182.5     183.5     185.7  

Grass seed

   180.4     185.9     136.7     183.1     177.0     180.4  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,700.0    $1,628.6    $1,523.6    $1,604.4    $1,653.6    $1,700.0  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Our Pet segment’s net sales for fiscal 2012 increased $79.42014 decreased $42.7 million, or 9.3%4.8%, to $930.7$845.5 million from $851.3$888.2 million in fiscal 2011.2013. The decline in pet sales was due principally to industry weakness, lost shelf space and increased competition in the categories in which we participate. Pet branded product sales decreased $63.4 million from fiscal 2013 due primarily to a $20.2 million decrease in our animal health category, an $18.0 million decrease in our bird and small animal category and a $15.4 million decrease in our aquatics category; all of these decreases were primarily volume driven. Our animal health category was impacted by lower sales in the flea and tick category, which resulted from a weak flea and tick season, lost shelf space, rebranding and repackaging resulting in return of the superceded product and increased $62.6 million and salescompetition. Sales of other manufacturers’ products increased $16.8approximately $20.7 million as compared with fiscal 2011. We experienced sales increases in most of our Pet categories, including a $37.1 million increase in our Animal Health category, due primarily to innovation and increased distribution of our flea and tick products. Additionally, our aquatics product sales increased $11.0 million due primarily to increased consumables sales.benefitting from expanded distribution.

Our Garden segment’s net sales for fiscal 20122014 decreased $8.0$6.5 million, or 1.0%0.9%, to $769.3$758.9 million from $777.3$765.4 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, garden2013. Garden branded product sales declined $18.2decreased $7.3 million due primarily to a $12.4 million decrease in our controls and fertilizer category which was impacted by reduced volumes and increased charges related to returns and promotional allowances for two discontinued garden products introduced in 2013. The decrease in controls and fertilizers was partially offset by an increase in grass seed sales primarily due to increased pricing. Sales of other manufacturers’ products increased $10.2approximately $0.8 million compared withto fiscal 2011. Garden branded product sales declined due primarily to a $26.3 million decrease in revenues of our other garden supply products, including a $24.8 million decline in seasonal décor products and a $2.4 million decline in pottery products, partially offset by a $21.7 million increase in sales of controls and fertilizers. Seasonal décor products were impacted by decreased sales programs in the current fiscal year and by increased sales returns. The majority of the decrease in seasonal décor and pottery occurred in our fourth fiscal quarter. Garden controls and fertilizer sales increased primarily due to growth in overall category demand, but were adversely affected by an early season surge in demand which coincided with operational disruptions arising from our transformational activities during our second fiscal quarter.2013.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $20.2decreased $9.9 million, or 4.1%2.1%, to $514.1$454.0 million from $493.9$463.9 million in fiscal 2011.2013. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales declinedincreased from 30.3%28.1% in fiscal 20112013 to 30.2%28.3% for fiscal 2012. 2014, with both the Pet segment and the Garden segment, including the garden charge, contributing to the small increase. Adjusting for the charges and gains reflected in the adjusted results, gross profit for fiscal 2014 decreased $4.1 million, or 0.9%, to $470.9 million from fiscal 2013. Adjusted gross margin increased from 28.7% for fiscal 2013 to 29.2% for fiscal 2014.

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased in the gardenPet segment and wasin fiscal 2014 due to a $42.7 million decrease in sales, partially offset by animproved gross margin. Most of our pet businesses had increased gross margins. The largest contributor to the margin increase was our bird and small animal business which benefitted from operational improvements in small animal and from lower commodity costs in bird feed. These gross margin increases were partially offset by a lower gross margin in our animal health category which was impacted by a mix shift in professional and a lower gross margin in our flea and tick category due primarily to the pet segment. In fiscal 2012, pressure on our margins from increases in raw material input costs experiencedrebranding and packaging efforts undertaken in fiscal 20112014.

In the Garden segment, gross profit remained relatively constant as the 0.9% decrease in net sales was somewhat mitigated in fiscal 2012offset by price increases.

Bothincreased gross margin. The Garden segment gross profit and gross margin increasedwere impacted in both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 by the Petgarden charges. The Garden segment gross margin improved slightly due primarily to increased sales of our flea and tick productsan improved gross margin in our Animal Health category, and increased margin on sales of wild bird feed, products, which was heavily impactedbenefitted from lower commodity costs and seasonal décor, due primarily to the elimination of less profitable products. These improvements to gross margin were partially offset by a decreased gross margin in the prior yeargrass seed, due primarily to higher prices of key commodity ingredients. These increases were partially offset by decreased margincosts, and in the dog & cat category which wascontrols and fertilizers, impacted by operational disruptions in our second fiscal quarter.

Grosslower sales volumes, and a sales mix shift adversely affected gross profit and gross margin decreased in the Garden segment. Seasonal décor products were impacted by reduced revenues in fiscal 2012, primarily due to a decrease in seasonal sales programs, increased sales returns and expenses. Grass seed was impacted by sales mix and increased costs in part due to lower than expected sales volumes. Additionally, the sales increase in garden controls and fertilizer products led to increased gross profit but decreased margin due to higher input and production costs as a result of a number of factors, including the operational disruptions encountered in our second fiscal quarter.margin.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $31.0decreased $18.2 million, or 7.6%4.4%, from $408.7$416.0 million in fiscal 20112013 to $439.7$397.8 million in fiscal 2012.2014. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increaseddecreased from 25.1%25.2% in fiscal 20112013 to 25.9%24.8% in fiscal 2012.2014. The change in selling, general and administrative expenses, discussed further below, was due primarily to increaseddecreased selling and delivery expense. Corporate expenses are included within administrative expense and relate to the costs of unallocated executive, administrative, finance, legal, human resource, and information technology functions.

Selling and delivery expense increased by $28.8decreased $17.6 million, or 12.7%7.5%, from $227.2$234.0 million in fiscal 20112013 to $256.0$216.4 million in fiscal 2012. The increased expense was due primarily to increased advertising and marketing program expenditures, including brand building activities, increased marketing personnel and variable compensation expenses related to the increase in sales, and delivery expenses also related to the increased sales in the period. The increased costs noted above include approximately $6.0 million of expenses previously reported within warehouse and administrative expense, discussed further below.2014. Selling and delivery expensesexpense as a percentage of net sales increaseddecreased from 14.0%14.2% in fiscal 20112013 to 15.1%13.5% in fiscal 2012. We expect2014. The decrease was due primarily to continue to increasedecreased marketing expenses, primarily advertising, associated with the controls and fertilizers and grass seed categories in our marketing-related expenditures in future periods to help grow our existing and new products and brands.Garden segment.

Warehouse and administrative expense increased $2.2decreased $0.6 million, or 1.2%0.3%, from $181.5$182.0 million in fiscal 20112013 to $183.7$181.4 million in fiscal 2012. We have reorganized2014. Decreased costs in both our operating units, realigned reporting linessegments were partially offset by a $9.3 million increase in corporate costs. In our Pet segment, the prior year warehouse consolidations are now yielding savings, and departments and moved personnel between departments in an effortour Garden segment, we recorded a $4.9 million gain from the sale of manufacturing plant assets related to aligna seasonal product we intend to purchase rather than produce. Corporate operating expense increased $9.3 million as a result of $5.9 million of software costs expensed (due primarily to changes in our operations withand related plans for future SAP implementations), increased medical insurance program costs and information technology third party provider costs related to our transformational objectives. As such, approximately $6.0SAP implementation.

Impairment

We perform an annual goodwill test for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized for goodwill if its carrying value exceeds its fair value. The goodwill fair values are estimated using the discounted cash flow

related to the assets. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we recognized a non-cash charge of $7.7 million related to the impairment of expenses previously reportedgoodwill within warehouseour Garden segment due to its continuing poor performance. We did not have an impairment charge in fiscal 2014.

Operating Income

Operating income increased $16.0 million in fiscal 2014, or 40.0%, to $56.2 million from $40.2 million in fiscal 2013. Lower selling, general and administrative expense are now includedexpenses and increased gross margin were partially offset by lower sales and the $16.9 million garden charge. Operating margin was 3.5% for fiscal 2014 and 2.4% for fiscal 2013. Excluding the garden charges, the gain on the sale of manufacturing plant assets and the goodwill impairment in sellingthe Garden segment, adjusted operating income was $68.2 million, as compared to $59.0 million in the prior year, and delivery expense. The increaseoperating margin improved to 4.2% as compared to 3.6% in warehouse and administrative expense, after taking into account the $6.0 million amount now part of selling and delivery expense, was $8.2prior year.

Pet segment operating income decreased $7.3 million, or 4.5%.7.7%, to $88.1 million for fiscal 2014 from $95.4 million for fiscal 2013. The increasedecrease was due primarily to approximately $6.7decreased sales, which drove lower gross profit, partially offset by decreased selling, general and administrative expenses. Pet operating margin decreased from 10.7% for fiscal 2013 to 10.4% for fiscal 2014. Garden operating income increased $32.7 million, of additional expense relatedor 395%, to transformation activities. These transformation costs include costs$41.0 million for severance, facility exitfiscal 2014 from $8.3 million for fiscal 2013. Adjusted operating income in Garden increased $25.9 million to $53.1 million for fiscal 2014 from $27.2 million in fiscal 2013, and the adjusted operating margin was 6.9% as compared to 3.5% in fiscal 2013. Garden adjusted operating income increased due primarily to a $20.1 million decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses. Corporate operating expenses increased $9.3 million due primarily to a $5.9 million long-lived software charge, increased medical insurance program costs and our shared service center start upinformation technology third party provider costs.

Within warehouse and administrative expense, approximately $5.3 million of expense shifted from our operating segments and are now part of corporate expense. These expenses were primarily related to our supply chain management team and our operational excellence teams.

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense increased $2.4decreased $0.2 million, or 6.4%0.5%, from $37.8$43.0 million in fiscal 20112013 to $40.2$42.8 million in fiscal 2012. Interest expense increased2014. The decrease was due to an increase in thelower interest expense due primarily to lower average debt outstanding during fiscal 2014 as compared to $474fiscal 2013 partially offset by the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs related to our prior revolving credit facility resulting in a non-cash charge of $1.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $443 million in fiscal 2011. In February 2012, we issued an additional $50 million aggregate principal amount of 8.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018 at a price of 98.501% of the principal amount of the notes. The notes are part of a series of 8.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018 issued by the Company in March 2010.

Our average interest rates for fiscal 2012 and 2011 were 8.2% and 8.1%, respectively.2014. Debt outstanding on September 29, 201227, 2014 was $449.8$450.2 million compared to $435.6$472.6 million as of September 24, 2011.28, 2013.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income increased $0.1 million from $0.6 million in fiscal 2011 to $0.7 million in fiscal 2012. While the majority(expense) is comprised of the amounts in both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 are related to earningsincome from investments accounted for under the equity method investment of accounting, the increaseforeign currency exchange gains and losses, and realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivative contracts used to economically hedge anticipated commodity purchases for use in our products. Other income increased $1.1 million from $0.7 million of expense in fiscal 2013 to $0.4 million of income in fiscal 2014. The improvement was due primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses.realized and unrealized losses incurred in fiscal 2013 from derivative contracts used to economically hedge anticipated commodity purchases that did not reoccur in fiscal 2014.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate inwas 29.2% for fiscal 2012 decreased to 36.7%,2014 compared to 40.8% ina 74.2% benefit for fiscal 2011 due primarily to increased2013. Our 2014 tax rate benefited from the removal of valuation allowances in fiscal 2011.

Fiscal 2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010

Net Sales

Net sales for fiscal 2011 increased $105.0 million, or 6.9%, to $1,628.6 million from $1,523.6 million in fiscal 2010. The increase was due to a $114.7 million, or 9.1%, increase in our branded product sales offset by a $9.7 million, or 3.7%, decrease in the sales of other manufacturers’ products. Branded product sales include products we manufacture under Central brand names and products we manufacture under third-party brands. Sales of our branded products represented 84% of our total sales in fiscal 2011.

Our Pet segment’s net sales for fiscal 2011 increased $10.8 million, or 1.3%, to $851.3 million from $840.5 million in fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2011, Pet branded product sales increased $10.4 million and sales of other manufacturers’ products increased $0.4 million as compared with fiscal 2010. The increase in sales was due primarily to increased sales of approximately $4.9 million in wild bird feed and $4.4 of aquatic products. The sales increase in wild bird feed was price driven while the increase in aquatic products was volume driven. Our pet health products decreased slightly due primarily to decreased sales of our flea, tick and mosquito products partially offset by increased sales of lower margin products such as rodenticide and dewormer products. The decrease in our flea and tick business was due primarily to the competition from generic fipronil and unfavorable weather.

Our Garden segment’s net sales for fiscal 2011 increased $94.2 million, or 13.8%, to $777.3 million from $683.1 million in fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2011, garden branded product sales increased $104.3 million and sales of other manufacturers’ products declined $10.1 million compared with fiscal 2010. The increase in branded product sales was due primarily to a $49.2 million increase in grass seed sales, a $23.7 million increase in bird feed sales and a $4.5 million increase in garden control and fertilizer products. The increase in grass seed sales was due primarily to increased volumes driven by customer demand and increased investment in brand building. The increase in bird feed sales was due to both volume and price increases. The net sales increase of $4.5 million in garden control and fertilizer products was due primarily to an increase of $20 million in fertilizer sales, partially offset by decreased control product sales.

Gross Profit

Gross profit decreased $21.2 million, or 4.1% to $493.9 million from $515.2 million in fiscal 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales declined from 33.8% in fiscal 2010 to 30.3% for fiscal 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased in both segments. In fiscal 2011, the continual increases in raw material input costs put pressure on our margins. For example, our weighted average cost per pound for our primary grains increased approximately 41% for fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.

Both gross profit and gross margin decreased in the Pet segment due primarily to higher prices of key commodity ingredients, such as milo, millet, sunflower and corn which impacted both our wild bird feed businessinternational deferred tax assets, and our super premium pet food, and a change in product mix in our health products, which shifted away from sales of higher margin flea, tick and mosquito products towards increased sales of lower margin products.

Gross profit increased in the Garden segment but gross margin decreased due primarily to higher commodity ingredient costs and the sales mix shift of garden control and fertilizer products. The higher ingredient costs impacted both bird feed and garden controls and fertilizer products. Additionally, there was a sales mix shift within garden controls and fertilizers whereby decreased sales of higher margin control products were offset by increased sales of lower margin fertilizer products.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $14.6 million, or 3.7%, from $394.1 million in fiscal 2010 to $408.7 million in fiscal 2011. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses

decreased from 25.9% in fiscal 2010 to 25.1% in fiscal 2011. The change in selling, general and administrative expenses, discussed further below, was due primarily to increased selling and delivery expense.

Selling and delivery expense increased by $21.4 million, or 10.4%, from $205.8 million in fiscal 2010 to $227.2 million in fiscal 2011. The increased expense was due primarily to increased advertising and marketing program expenditures, including brand building activities and increased variable expenses related to the increase in sales. Selling and delivery expenses as a percentage of net sales increased from 13.5% in fiscal 2010 to 14.0% in fiscal 2011. We expect to continue to increase our marketing-related expenditures in future periods to help grow our existing and new products and brands.

Facilities expense decreased $1.0 million, or 9.2%, from $10.9 million for fiscal 2010 to $9.9 million for fiscal 2011 due primarily to cost savings from warehouse consolidation in our garden segment.

Warehouse and administrative expense decreased $5.8 million, or 3.3%, from $177.4 million in fiscal 2010 to $171.6 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease in fiscal 2011 was due primarily to a reduction in performance-based compensation expense and lower third party provider costs, primarily legal costs.

Interest Expense

Net interest expense increased $4.2 million, or 12.4%, from $33.6 million in fiscal 2010 to $37.8 million in fiscal 2011. Interest expense increased due to both increased average debt outstanding of $443 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $409 million in fiscal 2010, and increased borrowing rates. Our average interest rates for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were 8.1% and 6.8%, respectively. Interest expense in fiscal 2010 included $3.9 million related to the tender for our 2013 Subordinated Notes and the issuance of our 2018 Subordinated Notes.

Debt outstanding on September 24, 2011 was $435.6 million compared to $400.3 million as of September 25, 2010.

Other Income

Other income increased $0.2 million from $0.4 million in fiscal 2010 to $0.6 million in fiscal 2011. The increase was due primarily to higher earnings from an investment accounted for under the equity method investment of accounting.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate benefited primarily from additional tax credits available in fiscal 2011 increased to 40.8%, compared to 37.0% in fiscal 2010. The increase in our effective tax rate was due primarily to our reduced ability to use tax benefits due to the decrease in fiscal 2011 income and increased tax valuation allowances.2013.

Inflation

Our revenues and margins are dependent on various economic factors, including rates of inflation, energy costs, consumer attitudes toward discretionary spending, currency fluctuations, and other macro-economic factors which may impact levels of consumer spending. Historically, inIn certain fiscal periods, we have been adversely

impacted by rising input costs related to domestic inflation, particularly relating to grain and seed prices, fuel prices and the ingredients used in our garden fertilizercontrols and chemicals.fertilizer. Rising costs in those periods have made it difficult for us to increase prices to our retail customers at a pace sufficient to enable us to maintain margins.

In fiscal 2010, 2011 and 2012,recent years, our business was negatively impacted by low consumer confidence, as well as other macro-economic factors. InThroughout most of fiscal 2012,2013, commodity costs continued to increase. We are developing plansIn fiscal 2014, commodity costs declined overall, although we were impacted by increases in the event current cost levels fail to moderate orour grass seed costs. In fiscal 2015, commodity costs further declined from fiscal 2014 levels. We continue to increase.monitor commodity prices in order to be in a position to take action to mitigate the impact of increasing raw material costs.

Weather and Seasonality

Our sales of lawn and garden products are influenced by weather and climate conditions in the different markets we serve. Additionally, our Garden segment’s business is highly seasonal. In fiscal 2012,2015, approximately 66% of our Garden segment’s net sales and 59%58% of our total net sales occurred during our second and third fiscal quarters. Substantially all of the Garden segment’s operating income is typically generated in this period, which has historically offset the operating loss incurred during the first fiscal quarter of the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have financed our growth through a combination of internally generated funds, bank borrowings, supplier credit, and sales of equity and debt securities to the public.

Historically, ourOur business has beenis seasonal and our working capital requirements and capital resources trackedtrack closely to this seasonal pattern. DuringGenerally, during the first fiscal quarter, accounts receivable reach their lowest level while inventory, accounts payable and short-term borrowings begin to increase. During the second fiscal quarter, receivables, accounts payable and short-term borrowings increase, reflecting the build-up of inventory and related payables in anticipation of the peak lawn and garden selling season. During the third fiscal quarter, inventory levels remain relatively constant while accounts receivable peak and short-term borrowings start to decline as cash collections are received during the peak selling season. During the fourth fiscal quarter, inventory levels are at their lowest, and accounts receivable and payables are substantially reduced through conversion of receivables to cash.

We service two broad markets: pet supplies and lawn and garden supplies. Our Pet segment involvespet supplies businesses involve products that have a year round selling cycle with a slight degree of seasonality. As a result, it is not necessary to maintain large quantities of inventory to meet peak demands. On the other hand, our Garden segment isOur lawn and garden businesses are highly seasonal with approximately 66% of theour Garden segment’s net sales occurring during the second and third fiscal quarters. For many manufacturers of garden products, thisThis seasonality requires them to shipthe shipment of large quantities of their product well ahead of the peak consumer buying periods. To encourage retailers and distributors to carry lawn and garden products,stock large quantities of inventory, industry practice has been for manufacturers to give extended credit terms and/or promotional discounts.

CashOperating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $39.1 million, from $126.5 million in fiscal 2014 to $87.4 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to an increased use of cash related to working capital accounts. Increased sales for fiscal 2015 drove an increase in accounts receivable for the current year as compared to the prior year. Inventory levels, excluding the impact of inventory acquired through acquisitions, decreased in 2015, though not to the same extent as in the prior year period. Elevated levels of inventory on-hand at the end of fiscal 2013 were brought down to lower levels by the end of fiscal 2014, which generated a larger amount of cash in that year, compared to the change in inventory levels and cash provided during the current fiscal year. We remain focused on bringing our investment in inventory down over time, while maintaining high fill rates and service levels to our customers.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $38.2$154.8 million, from $51.0$28.3 million of cash used in operating activities in fiscal 20112013 to $89.2$126.5 million of cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2012.2014. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to a decrease indecreased working capital investment, principally inventory, as the growth in inventory in prior years was not necessary in the current year. Our working capital accounts decreased approximately $6.6 million from the end of fiscal 2011 due primarily tospecifically our decreased investment in inventory. In fiscal 2013, we built safety stock to ensure our ability to service our customers would not be disrupted. In fiscal 2014, we managed our inventory during fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011.lower levels.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $11.7increased $14.7 million from approximately $56.2$35.2 million in fiscal 20112014 to approximately $44.5$49.9 million in fiscal 2012.2015. The decreaseincrease in cash used in investing activities was due primarily to increased payments made to acquire businesses and investments in joint ventures during fiscal 2015, as well as an increase in capital expenditures during fiscal 2015 related to investments in our facilities. Additionally, there was a decrease in proceeds from the sale of certain property and equipment in fiscal 20122014 that did not recur during the current year.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $10.1 million, from $25.1 million in fiscal 2013 to $35.2 million in fiscal 2014. The increase in cash used in investing activities was due primarily to our acquisition of certain assets of a privately-held maker of premium fertilizer for the professional and retail marketsEnvincio LLC in April 2014 for approximately $23$20 million and an increase in amounts invested in restricted cash in our Garden segment in fiscal 2011,and short-term investments. These increases were partially offset by an increaseproceeds received from the sale of $8.0 million ofthe Garden segment manufacturing plant propertyassets and equipment investmentlower capital expenditures in fiscal 2012.2014 compared to fiscal 2013 due to reduced expenditures related to facilities and our SAP implementation.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities decreased $65.4increased $40.6 million from $74.0$27.8 million in fiscal 20112014 to $8.6$68.4 million in fiscal 2012.2015. The decreaseincrease in cash used was due primarily to our private placementredemption of an additional $50 million aggregate principal of our 2018 Notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, lower net borrowings under our revolving credit facility in the current year compared to the prior year period, and lower repurchasesMarch 2015 at 102.063%, as well as increased purchases of our common stock during fiscal 2012.stock. During fiscal 2012,2015, we repurchased $20.9$15.1 million of our common stock on the open market, which consisted of 0.70.5 million shares of our voting common stock (CENT) at an aggregate cost of approximately $5.6$4.5 million, or approximately $8.02$9.00 per share, and 1.91.2 million shares of our non-voting Class A common stock (CENTA) at an aggregate cost of approximately $15.3$10.6 million, or approximately $8.05$8.83 per share.

We also used $24.5 million for minimum statutory tax withholdings related to the net share settlement of our stock. These uses of cash were partially offset by lower net borrowings under our revolving credit facility during fiscal 2015.

Net cash used in financing activities increased $48.1 million from $20.3 million of cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2013 to $27.8 million of cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2014. The increase in cash used was due primarily to net repayments under our revolving credit facility during fiscal 2014 compared to net borrowings in fiscal 2013.

We expect that our principal sources of funds will be cash generated from our operations and, if necessary, borrowings under our $375$390 million revolving creditasset backed loan facility. Based on our anticipated cash needs, availability under our revolving creditasset backed loan facility and the scheduled maturity of our debt, we believe that our sources of liquidity should be adequate to meet our working capital, capital spending and other cash needs for at least the next 12 months. However, we cannot assure you that these sources will continue to provide us with sufficient liquidity and, should we require it, that we will be able to obtain financing on terms satisfactory to us, or at all.

We believe that cash flows from operating activities, funds available under our revolving creditasset backed loan facility, and arrangements with suppliers will be adequate to fund our presently anticipated working capital requirements for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our capital expenditures, will not exceed $40 million for the next 12 months, which are related primarily to replacements and upgrades to plant and equipment and investment in our implementation of a scalable enterprise-wide information technology platform.platform, will not exceed $40 million for the next 12 months. We are investing in this information technology platform to improve existing operations, to support future growth and enable us to take advantage of new applications and technologies. We have invested approximately $78.5 million from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2012 in this initiative and plan to invest up to an additional $11.0 million in fiscal 2013 for planned implementations. Capital expenditures for 2013 and beyond will depend upon the pace of conversion of those remaining legacy systems. This initiative, when complete, will combine our numerous information systems into one enterprise system and create a common business model and common data, which should create greater efficiency and effectiveness.

As part of our growth strategy, we have acquired a number of companies in the past, and we anticipate that we will continue to evaluate potential acquisition candidates in the future. If one or more potential acquisition opportunities, including those that would be material, become available in the near future, we may require additional external capital. In addition, such acquisitions would subject us to the general risks associated with acquiring companies, particularly if the acquisitions are relatively large.

Free Cash Flow

   2015  2014  2013 

Net cash provided by operations

  $87,449   $126,467   $(28,282

Less: capital expenditures

   (22,030  (17,173  (25,172
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Free cash flow

  $65,419   $109,294   $(53,454
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Free cash flow as a percentage of net sales

   4.0  6.8  (3.2%) 

Free cash flow as a percentage of net sales decreased in fiscal year 2015, primarily due to an increase in working capital requirements due to increased sales and the inventory related to our acquisition of IMS. Free cash flow as a percentage of net sales increased in fiscal year 2014, primarily due to favorable changes in working capital, including a $66 million reduction in inventory, and increased earnings.

Stock Repurchases

During fiscal 2012,2015, we repurchased $20.9$15.1 million of our common stock, which consisted of 0.70.5 million shares of our voting common stock (CENT) at an aggregate cost of approximately $5.6$4.5 million, or approximately $8.02$9.00 per share, and 1.91.2 million shares of our non-voting Class A common stock (CENTA) at an aggregate cost of approximately $15.3$10.6 million, or approximately $8.05$8.83 per share. During the third quarter ofIn fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a new $100 million share repurchase program, under which approximately $52$35.0 million isremains available for repurchases in fiscal 20132016 and thereafter.

Total Debt

At September 29, 2012,26, 2015, our total debt outstanding was $449.8$400.1 million versus $435.6$450.2 million at September 24, 2011.

Senior Credit Facility

On June 8, 2011, we amended our $275 million, five-year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) included in our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). Under the modified terms, the Credit Facility has a borrowing capacity of $375 million, an increase of $100 million, and a maturity date of June 2016. The Credit Facility bears lower interest rates and commitment fees and requires less interest coverage. We continue to have the option to increase the size of the Credit Facility by an additional $200 million of incremental term loans and/or revolving loans should we exercise our option and one or more lenders are willing to make such increased amounts available to us. There was no outstanding balance as of September 29, 2012 under the Credit Facility. There were no letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility as of September 29, 2012. There were other letters of credit of $15.7 million outstanding as of September 29, 2012. As of September 29, 2012, there were $375.0 million of unused commitments under the Credit Facility or, after giving effect to the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement, $225.5 million of remaining borrowing capacity.

Interest on the amended Credit Facility is based, at our option, on a rate equal to the Alternate Base Rate (ABR), which is the greatest of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 1/2 of 1% or one month LIBOR plus 1%, plus a margin, which fluctuates from 0.75% to 1.75%, or LIBOR plus a margin, which fluctuates from 1.75% to 2.75% and commitment fees that range from 0.30% to 0.50%, determined quarterly based on consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent trailing 12-month period. As of September 29, 2012, the applicable interest rate on the Credit Facility related to alternate base rate borrowings was 5.0%, and the applicable interest rate related to LIBOR rate borrowings was 3.0%.

The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our material subsidiaries and is secured by our assets, excluding real property but including substantially all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains certain financial and other covenants which require us to maintain minimum levels of interest coverage and maximum levels of senior debt to EBITDA and that restrict our ability to repurchase our stock, make investments in or acquisitions of other businesses and pay dividends above certain levels over the life of the Credit Facility. Under the terms of our Credit Facility, we may make restricted payments, including cash dividends and stock repurchases, in an aggregate amount initially not to exceed $200 million over the life of the Credit Facility, subject to qualifications and baskets as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of September 29, 2012, our Total Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, was 4.0 to 1.0, and our Senior Secured Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement with a maximum of 2.0 to 1.0, was 0.01 to 1.0. Our minimum Interest Coverage Ratio was reduced to 2.50 times, from 2.75 times as part of the modification of the Credit Facility. As of September 29, 2012, our Interest Coverage ratio was 2.9 times. Apart from the covenants limiting restricted payments and capital expenditures, the Credit Facility does not restrict the use of retained earnings or net income. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 29, 2012.27, 2014.

Senior Subordinated Notes

OnIn March 8, 2010, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 8.25% senior subordinated notes due March 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”).

On February 13, 2012, we issued an additional $50 million aggregate principal amount of our 2018 Notes at a price of 98.501%, plus accrued interest from September 1, 2011, in a private placement. We used the net proceeds from the offering to pay a portion of the outstanding balance under our Credit Facility.

We incurred approximately $1.7 million of debt issuance costs in conjunction with this offering, which included underwriter fees and legal, accounting and rating agency expenses. The debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2018 Notes.

The estimated fair value of our $450$400 million of 2018 Notes as of September 29, 201226, 2015 was approximately $483$410.5 million. The estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices for these notes.

In March 2015, we redeemed $50.0 million of our 2018 Notes at a price of 102.063% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed. In conjunction with this transaction, we recognized a charge in interest expense of approximately $1.6 million in our second quarter of fiscal 2015 related to the payment of the call premium and the non-cash write-off of unamortized financing costs.

The 2018 Notes contained customary high yield covenants, including covenants limiting debt incurrence and restricted payments, subject to certain baskets and exceptions. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 26, 2015.

Issuance of $400 Million 6.125% Senior Notes

In November 2015, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior unsecured notes due November 2023 (the “2023 Notes”). The 2023 Notes require semiannual interest payments which commenced on September 1, 2010.November 15 and May 15, commencing May 15, 2016. The 20182023 Notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations and are subordinated to all of our existing and future senior debt, including our Credit Facility. The obligations under the 2018 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by each of our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries which are borrowers under or guarantors of our senior secured revolving credit facility. We used the net proceeds from the offering, together with certain exceptions. The guarantees are general unsecured senior subordinated obligationsavailable cash, to redeem our outstanding 2018 Notes and pay fees and expenses related to the offering. As a result of our redemption of the guarantors and are subordinated2018 Notes, we will recognize a charge in our fiscal 2016 first quarter of approximately $8.3 million related to all existing and future senior debtthe payment of the guarantors.call premium, a one-time payment of overlapping interest expense for 30 days of approximately $2.8 million and a $3.2 million non-cash charge for the write-off of unamortized financing costs in interest expense. We expect our annual interest expense on the 2023 Notes going forward to be approximately $8.5 million less than under the 2018 Notes.

We may redeem some or all of the 2018 Notes at any time prior to March 1, 2014 at the principal amount plus a “make whole” premium. We may redeem some or all of the 20182023 Notes at any time on or after March 1, 2014November 15, 2018 for 104.125%104.594%, after March 1, 2015 for 102.063% and after March 1, 2016 for 100%, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Additionally, at any time prior to March 1, 2013, we may redeem up to 35% of the 2018 Notes with any proceeds we receive from certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 108.25% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The holders of the 20182023 Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the 20182023 Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest upon the occurrence of a change of control.

The 20182023 Notes contain customary high yield covenants, including covenants limiting debt incurrence and restricted payments, subject to certain baskets and exceptions.

Asset Backed Loan Facility

On December 5, 2013, we entered into a credit agreement which provides up to a $390 million principal amount senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, with up to an additional $200 million principal amount available with the consent of the Lenders if we exercise the accordion feature set forth therein (collectively, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures on December 5, 2018 and replaced our prior revolving credit facility. We may borrow, repay and reborrow amounts under the Credit Facility until its maturity date, at which time all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility must be repaid in full. As of September 26, 2015, there were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility. There were other letters of credit of $6.0 million outstanding as of September 26, 2015.

The Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base, calculated using a formula based upon eligible receivables and inventory, minus certain reserves and subject to restrictions. The borrowing availability as of September 26, 2015 was $307 million. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at an index based on LIBOR or, at our option, the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the SunTrust prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% and (c) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%), plus, in either case, an applicable margin based on our total outstanding borrowings. Such applicable margin for LIBOR-based borrowings fluctuates between 1.25%-1.75% (1.25% at September 26, 2015) and such applicable margin for Base Rate borrowings fluctuates between 0.25%-0.75% (0.25% at September 26, 2015). As of September 26, 2015, the applicable interest rate related to Base Rate borrowings was 3.5%, and the applicable interest rate related to LIBOR-based borrowings was 1.4%.

The Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including financial covenants which require us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00:1.00 upon reaching certain borrowing levels. The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our assets. We were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Facility during the period ended September 26, 2015.

We incurred approximately $3.1 million of costs in conjunction with this transaction, which included banking fees and legal expenses. These costs will be amortized over the term of the Credit Facility.

We recorded a non-cash charge of $1.7 million for the three month period ended December 28, 2013 as part of September 29, 2012.interest expense, related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs under the prior revolving credit facility.

Contractual Obligations

The table below presents our significant contractual cash obligations by fiscal year:

Contractual Obligations

Fiscal
2016
Fiscal
2017
Fiscal
2018
Fiscal
2019
Fiscal
2020
Thereafter
Total
(in millions)

TheLong-term debt, including current maturities (1)

$0.3$0.1$400.0$—  $—  $—  $400.4

Interest payment obligations (2)

33.033.016.5—  —  —  82.5

Operating leases

19.116.09.58.04.51.058.1

Purchase commitments (3)

111.139.224.415.46.81.4198.3

Performance-based payments (4)

—  —  —  —  —  —  —  

Total

$163.5$88.3$450.4$23.4$11.3$2.4$739.3

(1)Excludes $6.0 million of outstanding letters of credit related to normal business transactions. Excludes unamortized discount of $0.3 million related to the 2018 Notes. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of long-term debt.
(2)Estimated interest payments to be made on our 2018 Notes. In November 2015, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due November 2023. We used the net proceeds from the offering, together with available cash, to redeem our 2018 Notes and pay fees and expenses related to the offering. As a result of our redemption of the 2018 Notes, we will recognize a charge in our fiscal 2016 first quarter of approximately $8.3 million related to the payment of the call premium, a one-time payment of overlapping interest expense for 30 days of approximately $2.8 million and a $3.2 million non-cash charge for the write-off of unamortized financing costs in interest expense. We expect our annual interest expense on the 2023 Notes going forward to be approximately $8.5 million less than under the 2018 Notes. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for description of interest rate terms.
(3)Contracts for purchases of grains, grass seed and pet food ingredients, used primarily to mitigate risk associated with increases in market prices and commodity availability.
(4)Possible performance-based payments associated with prior acquisitions of businesses are not included in the above table, below presents our significant contractual cash obligations bybecause they are based on future performance of the businesses acquired, which is not yet known. Performance-based payments of $0.7 million were made in 2015 related to B2E, acquired in fiscal year:

Contractual Obligations

  Fiscal
2013
   Fiscal
2014
   Fiscal
2015
   Fiscal
2016
   Fiscal
2017
   Thereafter   Total 
   (in millions) 

Long-term debt, including current maturities (1)

  $0.3    $0.1    $0.1    $—      $—      $450.0    $450.5  

Interest payment obligations (2)

   37.1     37.1     37.1     37.1     37.1     18.6     204.1  

Operating leases

   20.0     14.5     10.0     6.8     4.4     2.0     57.7  

Purchase commitments (3)

   82.2     36.2     23.3     13.6     9.2     4.5     169.0  

Performance-based payments (4)

   —       —       —       —       —       —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $139.6    $87.9    $70.5    $57.5    $50.7    $475.1    $881.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Excludes $15.7 million of outstanding letters of credit related to normal business transactions. Excludes unamortized discount of $0.7 million related to the $450 million Senior Subordinated Notes. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of long-term debt.2013. Potential performance-based periods extend through 2020. In addition, we may be obligated to pay up to $5.1 million in future performance payments if and when certain revenue and performance targets are achieved.
(2)Estimated interest payments to be made on our long-term debt. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for description of interest rate terms.
(3)Contracts for purchases of grains, grass seed and pet food ingredients, used primarily to mitigate risk associated with increases in market prices and commodity availability.
(4)Possible performance-based payments associated with prior acquisitions of businesses are not included in the above table, because they are based on future performance of the businesses acquired, which is not yet known. Performance-based payments were not made in fiscal 2012, and were approximately $1.9 million in fiscal 2011 and approximately $1.8 million in fiscal 2010. Potential performance-based periods extend through 2015.

As of September 29, 2012, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $0.2

As of September 26, 2015, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $0.1 million. These amounts have been excluded from the contractual obligations table because a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of future tax settlements cannot be determined.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value MeasurementsDiscontinued Operations

In January 2010,April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08),Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 provides amended guidance

for reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components. The amended guidance raises the threshold for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations and permits significant continuing involvement and continuing cash flows with the discontinued operation. In addition, the amended guidance requires additional disclosures for discontinued operations and new disclosures for individually material disposal transactions that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The amended guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014 and became effective for us prospectively commencing September 27, 2015. The adoption of the applicable sections of this ASC may have an impact on the accounting for any future discontinued operations we may have.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This update was issued as Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606. The core principle of this amendment is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for us in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 28, 2019. Earlier adoption is not permitted before the original effective date. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Stock Based Compensation

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This2014-12 (ASU 2014-12),Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. ASU No. 2014-12 requires new disclosures regarding transfersthat a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in and out of Level 1 and Level 2Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value measurements, as well as requiring presentation on a gross basis information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in Level 3 fair value measurements. Theof the award. ASU also clarifies existing disclosures regarding level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. The ASU2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim andperiods within those annual

reporting periods beginning after December 15, 20092015, or our first quarter of fiscal 2017. Earlier adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial statements.

Consolidation

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02), Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis to ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. ASU 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and became effective for us on December 27, 2009. Disclosures about purchases, sales, issuancessimilar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and settlements inaffects the roll forwardconsolidation analysis of activity in Level 3 fair value measurementsreporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years beginningthat begin after December 15, 2010 and became effective for us2015, or our first quarter of fiscal 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have on September 25, 2011.our consolidated financial statements.

Debt Issuance Costs

In May 2011,April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820)2015-03(ASU 2015-03), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): AmendmentsSimplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This standard amends the existing guidance to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirementsrequire that debt issuance costs be presented in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.”the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of as a deferred charge. In August 2015, the Financial Accounting

Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-15, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). This ASU provides additional guidance relatedon ASU 2015-03 with respect to fair valueline of credit arrangements, whereby specify debt issuance costs as part of line-of-credit arrangements may continue to be deferred and presented as an asset on the balance sheet. Recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. These ASUs are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, or our first quarter of fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. As of September 26, 2015, we had approximately $3.4 million of net deferred financing costs that changeswould be reclassified from a long-term asset to a reduction in the wording used to describe many requirementscarrying amount of our debt upon adoption of the standard.

Cloud Computing Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05(ASU 2015-05),Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in GAAPa Cloud Computing Arrangement. This standard clarifies the circumstances under which a cloud computing customer would account for measuring and disclosing fair values. Additionally, the amendments clarify the applicationarrangement as a license of existing fair value measurement requirements. The amended guidanceinternal-use software under ASC 350-40. ASU 2015-05 is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods therein beginning after December 15, 2015, or our first quarter of fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may adopt the guidance either retrospectively or prospectively to arrangements entered into, or materially modified after the effective date. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2015-05 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Inventory Measurement

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 (ASU 2015-11),Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. Under ASU 2015-11, inventory will be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. The standard defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. ASU 2015-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this guidance at the beginning of2016, or our second fiscalfirst quarter of 2012. Adoptionfiscal 2018. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance did notASU 2015-11 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statement disclosures.statements.

Comprehensive IncomeBusiness Combinations

In June 2011,September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.”2015-16 (ASU 2015-16),Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. ASU No. 2011-052015-16 requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equityan acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period after an acquisition within the reporting period they are determined. This is a change from the previous requirement that the adjustments be presented either in a single continuous statementrecorded retrospectively. The ASU also requires disclosure of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements, eliminating the option to present other comprehensive income in the statementeffect on earnings of changes in equity. Under either choice, items that are reclassified fromdepreciation, amortization or other comprehensive income to net income are required to be presented on the faceeffects, if any, as a result of the financial statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued an update to ASU no. 2011-05, ASU No. 2011-12, which was issued to defer the effective date for amendmentsadjustment to the reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income inprovisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. ASU No. 2011-05. ASU 2011-05 and the amendments in ASU No. 2011-12 are2015-16 is effective for fiscal years andannual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those years,periods) beginning after December 15, 2011 and became effective for us on2015; early adoption is permitted. We have early adopted the guidance prospectively as of September 30, 2012. The guidance will be applied retrospectively. This amendment will change the manner in which we present comprehensive income and will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”). The amendments in this update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010 and was effective for us on September 25, 2011.27, 2015. The adoption of this ASU did not have a materialstandard will impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwillaccounting for Impairment, which amended the guidance on the annual testing of goodwillmeasurement period adjustments for impairment. The amended guidance will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, and became effective for us on September 30, 2012. We have determined that this new guidance will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Intangible Assetsany future business combinations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued an ASU No. 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which simplifies the manner in which companies test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The ASU permits companies to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. The ASU is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The guidance became effective for us on September 30, 2012. We do not expect the adoption of the ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Judgments

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations areis based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Estimates and assumptions are required for, but are not limited to, accounts receivable and inventory realizable values, fixed asset lives, long-lived asset valuation and impairments, intangible asset lives, stock-based

compensation, deferred and current income taxes, self-insurance accruals and the impact of contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which forms the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Although not all inclusive, we believe that the following represent the more critical accounting policies, which are subject to estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record an allowance for credit losses and disputed balances associated with our customers’ failure to make required payments. We estimate our allowance based on both specific identification, historical experience, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends. Generally, we require no collateral from our customers. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, we were not able to demonstrate the validity of amounts due or if future default rates on trade receivables in general were to differ from those currently anticipated, additional allowances maycould be required, which would effectaffect earnings in the period the adjustments are made. For more information, see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements.

Inventory

Inventory, which primarily consists of lawn and garden products and pet supplies finished goods, is stated at the lower of first-in first-out (“FIFO”) cost or market. Cost includes certain indirect purchasing, merchandise handling and storage costs incurred to acquire or manufacture inventory, costs to unload, process and put away shipments received to prepare them to be picked for orders, and certain overhead costs. We compute the amount of such costs capitalized to inventory based on an estimate of costs related to the procurement and processing of inventory to prepare it for sale compared to total product purchases. When necessary, we have reduced the carrying value of our inventory if market conditions indicate that we will not recover the carrying cost upon sale. Future adverse changes in market conditions related to our products could result in an additional charge to income in the period in which such conditions occur.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations are recorded based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives are not subject to amortization but must be evaluated for impairment.

We test goodwill for impairment annually (on the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter), or whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, by initially comparing the fair value of each of our four reporting units to their related carrying values. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform an additional step to determine the implied fair value of goodwill associated with that reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by first allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities and then computing the excess of the reporting unit’s fair value over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, such excess represents the amount of goodwill impairment, and, accordingly, we recognize such impairment. Our goodwill impairment analysis also includes a comparison of the aggregate estimated fair value of all four reporting units to our total market capitalization.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The estimate of fair value of each of our reporting units is based on our projection of revenues, gross margin, operating costs and cash flows considering historical and estimated future results, general economic and market conditions as well as the impact of planned business and operational strategies. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable at the time, but such assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainty. Assumptions critical to our fair value estimates were: (i) discount rates used in determining the fair value of the reporting units; (ii) estimated future cash flows; and (iii) projected revenue and operating profit growth rates used in the reporting unit models. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The valuations employ present value techniques to measure fair value and consider market factors.

Our goodwill is associated with one of the reporting units within our Pet segment.

In connection with our annual goodwill impairment testing performed during fiscal 2012, 20112015 and 2010,2014, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of our reporting segments exceeded their carrying value by more than 10%, and accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required.

Changes in the judgments and estimates underlying our analysis of goodwill for possible impairment, including expected future cash flows and discount rate, could result in a significantly different estimate of the fair value of the reporting units in the future and could result in additional impairment of goodwill.

Intangible assets

Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of acquired trade names and trademarks. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances occur indicating that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized for an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life if its carrying value exceeds its fair value.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset to the carrying value. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flow analyses that include significant management assumptions such as revenue growth rates, discount rates, weighted average cost of capital, and assumed royalty rates. Future net sales and short-term growth rates are estimated for trade names based on management’s forecasted financial results which consider key business drivers such as specific revenue growth initiatives, market share changes and general economic factors such as consumer spending.

During fiscal 2012,2015, 2014 and 2013, we performed an evaluationevaluations of the fair value of our indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks. Our expected revenues arewere based on our fiscal 2013future operating plan and market growth or decline estimates for

future years. In fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2018. We also included revenue growth estimates based on current initiatives2015, we recognized a $7.3 million non-cash impairment charge related to certain indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of increased competition in the marketplace and an expected to help us improve performance.decline in the volume of sales. The fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets exceed the remaining $15.0 million carrying value at September 26, 2015. No impairment was indicated during our fiscal 2012 analysis of our indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks.

During fiscal 2011, we performed an evaluation of the fair value of our indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks. Our expected revenues are based on our fiscal 2012 plan and market growth2014 or decline estimates for fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2017. We also included revenue growth estimates based on current initiatives expected to help us improve performance. No impairment was indicated during our fiscal 20112013 analysis of our indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks.

Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets, including amortizable intangibles and property, plant and equipment, for potential impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized for amortizable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from use of the asset are less than its carrying amount. Management determines fair value by estimating future cash flows as a result of forecasting sales and costs. Impairment, if any, is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. No factors indicating the carrying value of our tangible long-lived assets may not be recoverable were present in fiscal 2012,2015, and accordingly, no impairment

testing was performed on these assets. No factors indicating the carrying value of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable were present in fiscal 2011,2014, and accordingly, no impairment testing was performed on these assets. In fiscal 2010, factors were present indicating the carryingHowever, due to changes in our operations and related plans for future SAP implementations, we determined that certain software costs previously incurred had no future value of certain amortizable long-lived assets may not be recoverable, which prompted us to perform impairment testing on these assets. The carrying values of the assets were determined to be recoverable, and accordingly, no impairment charges were recognized duringa charge of $5.9 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.2014. Should market conditions or the assumptions used by us in determining the fair value of assets change, or management change plans regarding the future usage of certain assets, additional charges to operations may be required in the period in which such conditions occur.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes result primarily from bad debt allowances, inventory and goodwill write-downs, depreciation and nondeductible reserves. We establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets when management believes it is more likely than not a deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of fiscal 2012 and 2011, we had valuation allowances related to various state and foreign net deferred tax assets of $7.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively. We have no undistributed foreign earnings.

Accruals for Self-Insurance

We maintain insurance for certain risks, including workers’ compensation, general liability and vehicle liability, and are self-insured for employee related health care benefits. Our workers’ compensation, general liability and vehicle liability insurance policies include deductibles of $250,000 to $350,000 per occurrence, with a separate deductible of $50,000 for physical damage. We maintain excess loss insurance that covers any health care claims in excess of $700,000 per person per year. We maintain a self-insurance reserve for losses, determined with assistance from a third-partythird party actuary, based on claims filed and actuarial estimates of the ultimate loss amount inherent in the claims, including losses for claims incurred but not reported. Any actuarial projection of losses concerning workers’ compensation and general liability is subject to a high degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting future inflation rates, discount rates, litigation trends, legal interpretations, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our self-insurance liabilities. However, any differences in estimates and assumptions could result in accrual requirements materially different from the calculated accruals.

Acquisitions

In connection with businesses we acquire, management must determine the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Considerable judgment and estimates are required to determine such amounts, particularly as they relate to identifiable intangible assets, and the applicable useful lives related thereto. Under different assumptions, the resulting valuations could be materially different, which could materially impact the operating results we report.

Our contractual commitments are presented inunder the caption Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks, which include changes in U.S. interest rates and commodity prices and, to a lesser extent, foreign exchange rates. We do not engage in financial transactions for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk. The interest payable on our revolving credit facilityCredit Facility is based on variable interest rates and therefore affected by changes in market interest rates. We had no variable rate debt outstanding as of September 29, 2012.26, 2015 under our Credit Facility. If interest rates on our average variable rate debt outstanding during the fiscal year2015 had changed by 100 basis points compared to actual rates, interest expense would have increased or decreased by approximately $0.4 million in fiscal 2012.$0.3 million. In addition, we have investments consisting of cash equivalents and short-term investments, which are also affected by changes in market interest rates.

Commodity Prices.We are exposed to fluctuations in market prices for grains, grass seed, chemicals, fertilizer ingredients and pet food ingredients. To mitigate risk associated with increases in market prices and commodityandcommodity availability, we enter into contracts for purchases, primarily to ensure commodity availability to us in the future. As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, we had entered into fixed purchase commitments for commodities totaling approximately $169.0$198.3 million. A 10% change in the market price for these commodities would result in an additional pretax gain or loss of $16.9$19.8 million as the related inventory containing those inputs is sold.

Foreign Currency Risks.Our market risk associated with foreign currency rates is not considered to be material.To date, we have had minimal sales outside of the United States. Purchases made by our U.S. subsidiaries from foreign vendors are primarily made in U.S. dollars. Our international subsidiary transacts most of its business in British pounds. Therefore, we have only minimal exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. We do not hedge against foreign currency risks and believe that foreign currency exchange risk is immaterial to our current business.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See pages beginning at F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer have reviewed, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that ensure that information relating to the Company required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely and proper manner and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon this review, such officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 29, 2012.26, 2015.

(b)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Central’sOur management, with the participation of Central’sour Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated whether any change in Central’sour internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.2015. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that there has been no change in Central’sour internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20122015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Central’sour internal control over financial reporting.

(c)Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. A copy of our management’s report and the report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, are included in our Financial Statements and Supplementary Data beginning on page F-1.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our executive officers and directors, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 14.

The remaining information required by this item is incorporated by reference from Central’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors – Committees of the Board”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Code of Ethics.” See also Item 1 – Business above.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from Central’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors – Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.”

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from Central’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Ownership of Management and Principal Stockholders” and Executive Compensation – “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from Central’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors – Board Independence” and “Transactions with the Company.”

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from Central’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

 (a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

 (1)Consolidated Financial Statements of Central Garden & Pet Company are attached to this Form 10-K beginning on page F-1:

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

 (2)Exhibits:

See attached Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 13, 201210, 2015

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

By

 

/S/    WILLIAM E. BROWNs/ John R. Ranelli

 

William E. BrownJohn R. Ranelli

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

 

Signature

  

Capacity

  

Date

/Ss/ John R. Ranelli

John R. Ranelli

Director, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)December 10, 2015

/    WILLIAM E. BROWNs/ David N. Chichester

David N. Chichester

Acting Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)December 10, 2015

/s/ Howard A. Machek

Howard A. Machek

Senior Vice President and

Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

December 10, 2015

William E. Brown

  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  December 13, 201210, 2015

/S/    LORI A. VARLAS

Lori A. Varlas

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)December 13, 2012

/S/    JOHNs/ John B. BALOUSEKBalousek

John B. Balousek

  Director  December 13, 201210, 2015

/S/    DAVID N. CHICHESTERs/ Thomas J. Colligan

David N. ChichesterThomas J. Colligan

  Director  December 13, 201210, 2015

/S/    BROOKSs/ Brooks M. PENNINGTON,Pennington, III

Brooks M. Pennington, III

  Director  December 13, 201210, 2015

/S/    ALFREDs/ Alfred A. PIERGALLINIPiergallini

Alfred A. Piergallini

  Director  December 13, 201210, 2015

/S/    JOHN R. RANELLIs/ George C. Roeth

John R. RanelliGeorge C. Roeth

  Director  December 13, 201210, 2015

/s/ Mary Beth Springer

Mary Beth Springer

DirectorDecember 10, 2015

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Central Garden & Pet Company

  

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

   F-2  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-3  

Consolidated Balance Sheets, September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 201127, 2014

   F-4  

Consolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September  24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013

   F-5  

Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015,  September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013

   F-6

Consolidated Statements of Equity for Fiscal Years Ended September 26, 2015, September  27, 2014 and September 28, 2013

F-7  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September  24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013

   F-7F-8  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September  24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013

   F-8F-9  

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Central Garden & Pet Company’s management, under the supervision of Central’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management evaluated the effectiveness of Central’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternalControl –Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission.

Based on evaluation of the criteria set forth by COSO inInternal ControlIntegrated Framework(1992),management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 29, 2012.26, 2015.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued a report on our internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page F-3 of this Form 10-K.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become ineffective because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Central Garden & Pet Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Central Garden & Pet Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 29, 2012.26, 2015. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Central Garden & Pet Company and subsidiaries as of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ DeloitteDELOITTE & ToucheTOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, California

December 13, 201210, 2015

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

  September 29,
2012
   September 24,
2011
   September 26,
2015
   September 27,
2014
 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 
ASSETS      

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $48,475    $12,031    $47,584    $78,676  

Restricted cash

   13,157     14,283  

Short term investments

   22,705     17,820     0     9,990  

Accounts receivable, net

   202,422     195,417     207,402     193,729  

Inventories

   330,032     329,546     335,946     326,386  

Prepaid expenses, deferred income taxes and other

   48,149     47,772     49,731     48,488  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current assets

   651,783     602,586     653,820     671,552  

Plant, property and equipment, net

   191,163     176,402     162,809     166,849  

Goodwill

   210,223     210,223     209,089     208,233  

Other intangible assets, net

   78,853     84,526     75,460     87,997  

Other assets

   17,525     19,266     33,576     14,096  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total.

  $1,149,547    $1,093,003  

Total

  $1,134,754    $1,148,727  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

  $126,662    $116,524    $88,889    $88,428  

Accrued expenses

   79,491     75,128     87,724     84,379  

Current portion of long-term debt

   331     279     291     291  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current liabilities

   206,484     191,931     176,904     173,098  

Long-term debt

   449,483     435,330     399,848     449,948  

Deferred income taxes and other long-term obligations

   28,697     8,960     51,622     39,228  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

    

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

    

Equity:

        

Common stock

   122     129     119     124  

Class A common stock

   347     359     364     369  

Class B stock

   16     16     16     16  

Additional paid-in capital

   382,195     396,208     388,636     396,586  

Retained earnings

   79,718     59,045     115,987     86,396  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   1,539     1,019     164     1,232  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Central Garden & Pet shareholders’ equity

   463,937     456,776     505,286     484,723  
  

 

   

 

 

Noncontrolling interest

   946     6     1,094     1,730  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total equity

   464,883     456,782     506,380     486,453  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,149,547    $1,093,003    $1,134,754    $1,148,727  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
 September 25,
2010
   September 26,
2015
 September 27,
2014
 September 28,
2013
 
  (in thousands, except per share amounts)   (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net sales

  $1,700,013   $1,628,652   $1,523,648    $1,650,737   $1,604,357   $1,653,633  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

   1,185,855    1,134,733    1,008,482     1,162,685    1,150,333    1,189,731  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   514,158    493,919    515,166     488,052    454,024    463,902  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   439,737    408,744    394,092     389,345    397,811    416,038  

Intangible asset impairments

   0    0    12,000  

Intangible asset and goodwill impairment

   7,272    0    7,709  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   74,421    85,175    109,074     91,435    56,213    40,155  

Interest expense

   (40,315  (38,044  (33,706   (40,027  (42,844  (43,112

Interest income

   145    296    119     129    94    142  

Other income

   678    550    419  

Other income (expense)

   13    403    (677
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

   34,929    47,977    75,906  

Income taxes

   12,816    19,595    28,110  

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

   51,550    13,866    (3,492

Income tax expense (benefit)

   18,535    4,045    (2,592
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

   22,113    28,382    47,796  

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

   33,015    9,821    (900

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   940    59    1,963     1,044    1,017    1,029  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  $21,173   $28,323   $45,833  

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  $31,971   $8,804   $(1,929
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income per share attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company:

    

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company:

    

Basic

  $0.44   $0.50   $0.71    $0.66   $0.18   $(0.04

Diluted

  $0.44   $0.50   $0.70    $0.64   $0.18   $(0.04

Weighted average shares used in the computation of net income per share:

        

Basic

   47,622    56,217    64,272     48,562    48,880    48,094  

Diluted

   48,374    56,645    65,091     49,638    49,397    48,094  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   September 26,
2015
  September 27,
2014
  September 28,
2013
 

Net income (loss)

  $33,015   $9,821   $(900

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Foreign currency translation

   (1,078  (200  (97

Unrealized loss on securities

   (10  (10  0  

Reclassification of loss on available for sale securities to net income

   20    0    0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   31,947    9,611    (997

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   1,044    1,017    1,029  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  $30,903   $8,594   $(2,026
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(dollars in thousands)

 

  Central Garden & Pet Company  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total 
  Common Stock  Class A Common
Stock
  Class B Stock  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Total   
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount       

Balance, September 26, 2009

  18,777,155   $188    47,532,954   $475    1,652,262   $16   $531,300   $12,044   $1,062   $545,085   $2,250   $547,335  

Stock-based compensation

        3,607      3,607     3,607  

Tax benefit on exercise of stock options

        836      836     836  

Restricted share activity

  (11,629   73,240    1      (208    (207   (207

Issuance of common stock

  22,903     363,703    4      1,466      1,470     1,470  

Repurchase of common stock

  (2,529,725  (25  (4,273,471  (43    (53,184  (12,558   (65,810   (65,810

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

            (2,761  (2,761

Other

            (5  (5

Comprehensive income

            

Net change in foreign currency translation.

          (118  (118   (118

Net income

         45,833     45,833    1,963    47,796  
          

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

           45,715    1,963    47,678  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, September 25, 2010

  16,258,704    163    43,696,426    437    1,652,262    16    483,817    45,319    944    530,696    1,447    532,143  

Stock-based compensation

  0    0    0    0    0    0    5,545    0    0    5,545    0    5,545  

Tax deficiency on exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit

  0    0    0    0    0    0    (501  0    0    (501  0    (501

Restricted share activity

  (5,867  (1  470,009    4      (267    (264   (264

Issuance of common stock

  14,401    0    421,183    4    0    0    1,570    0    0    1,574    0    1,574  

Repurchase of common stock

  (3,317,645  (33  (8,646,258  (86  0    0    (93,956  (14,597  0    (108,672  0    (108,672

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

            (1,500  (1,500

Comprehensive income

            

Net change in foreign currency translation.

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    75    75    0    75  

Net income

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    28,323    0    28,323    59    28,382  
          

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    28,398    59    28,457  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, September 24, 2011

  12,949,593    129    35,941,360    359    1,652,262    16    396,208    59,045    1,019    456,776    6    456,782  

Stock-based compensation

  0    0    0    0    0    0    5,449    0    0    5,449    0    5,449  

Tax benefit on exercise of stock options

  0    0    0    0    0    0    56    0    0    56    0    56  

Restricted share activity

  (9,722  (0  90,540    1      369      370     370  

Issuance of common stock

  0    0    579,702    6    0    0    471    0    0    477    0    477  

Repurchase of common stock

  (692,300  (7  (1,904,700  (19  0    0    (20,358  (500  0    (20,884  0    (20,884

Comprehensive income

            

Net change in foreign currency translation.

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    520    520    0    520  

Net income

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    21,173    0    21,173    940    22,113  
          

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    21,693    940    22,633  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, September 29, 2012

  12,247,571   $122    34,706,902   $347    1,652,262   $16   $382,195   $79,718   $1,539   $463,937   $946   $464,883  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Central Garden & Pet Company       
  Common Stock  Class A Common
Stock
  Class B Stock  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Total  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount       

Balance, September 29, 2012

  12,247,571   $122    34,706,902   $347    1,652,262   $16   $382,195   $79,718   $1,539   $463,937   $946   $464,883  

Amortization of share-based awards

  0    0    0    0    0    0    4,210    0    0    4,210    0    4,210  

Tax deficiency on exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit

  0    0    0    0    0    0    (90  0    0    (90  0    (90

Restricted share activity

  (820  0    442,238    4      2,460      2,464     2,464  

Issuance of common stock

  0    0    307,761    3    0    0    1,683    0    0    1,686    0    1,686  

Repurchase of common stock

  0    0    (165,900  (1  0    0    (1,305  (197  0    (1,503  0    (1,503

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

            (629  (629

Other comprehensive loss

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    (97  (97  0    (97

Net loss

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    (1,929  0    (1,929  1,029    (900
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, September 28, 2013

  12,246,751    122    35,291,001    353    1,652,262    16    389,153    77,592    1,442    468,678    1,346    470,024  

Amortization of share-based awards

  0    0    0    0    0    0    4,572    0    0    4,572    0    4,572  

Tax deficiency on exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit

  0    0    0    0    0    0    (1,973  0    0    (1,973  0    (1,973

Restricted share activity

  190,556    2    1,232,105    12    0    0    3,446      3,460     3,460  

Issuance of common stock

  0    0    364,505    4    0    0    1,390    0    0    1,394    0    1,394  

Repurchase of common stock

  0    0    (300  0    0    0    (2  (0  0    (2  0    (2

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

            (633  (633

Other comprehensive loss

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    (210  (210  0    (210

Net income

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    8,804    0    8,804    1,017    9,821  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, September 27, 2014

  12,437,307    124    36,887,311    369    1,652,262    16    396,586    86,396    1,232    484,723    1,730    486,453  

Amortization of share-based awards

  0    0    0    0    0    0    6,378    0    0    6,378    0    6,378  

Tax deficiency on exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit

  0    0    0    0    0    0    (358  0    0    (358  0    (358

Restricted share activity

  (12,073  0    156,477    2    0    0    (1,233  0    0    (1,231  0    (1,231

Issuance of common stock

  641    0    536,827    5    0    0    (10  0    0    (5  0    (5

Repurchase of common stock

  (517,558  (5  (1,118,316  (12  0    0    (12,727  (2,380  0    (15,124  0    (15,124

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    (1,680  (1,680

Other comprehensive loss

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    (1,068  (1,068  0    (1,068

Net income

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0    31,971    0    31,971    1,044    33,015  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, September 26, 2015

  11,908,317   $119    36,462,299   $364    1,652,262   $16   $388,636   $115,987   $164   $505,286   $1,094   $506,380  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  Fiscal Year Ended  Fiscal Year Ended 
  September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
 September 25,
2010
  September 26,
2015
 September 27,
2014
 September 28,
2013
 
  (in thousands)  (in thousands) 

Cash flows from operating activities:

       

Net income

  $22,113   $28,382   $47,796  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Net income (loss)

 $33,015   $9,821   $(900

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

   

Depreciation and amortization

   30,425    28,566    28,869    33,703    35,781    32,968  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

  1,996    2,107    2,174  

Stock-based compensation

   7,510    7,447    5,556    8,315    7,678    15,892  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

   (1,881  (945  (836  (2,154  (498  (388

Deferred income taxes

   14,411    25,289    17,420    15,566    5,548    (3,233

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   0    0    3,633  

Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment

   180    110    395  

Intangible asset impairments

   0    0    12,000  

Gain on sale of property and equipment

  0    (4,875  0  

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

  702    1,063    547  

Write-off of deferred financing costs

  537    1,731    0  

Asset impairments

  7,272    5,870    7,709  

Other

  (69  249    370  

Changes in assets and liabilities (excluding businesses acquired):

       

Receivables

   (6,841  37    14,132    (9,093  2,655    8,185  

Inventories

   (164  (31,683  (1,227  4,403    69,698    (61,697

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   7,466    (3,339  3,677    (4,325  (176  2,624  

Accounts payable

   9,805    7,404    2,918    (4,757  (16,321  (23,866

Accrued expenses

   4,955    (9,899  981    1,485    8,442    (7,781

Other long-term obligations

   1,190    (361  (85  853    (2,306  (886
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   89,169    51,008    135,229  

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

  87,449    126,467    (28,282
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

       

Additions to property, plant and equipment

   (39,592  (31,563  (24,190  (22,030  (17,173  (25,172

Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

   0    (25,307  (1,756

Return of equity method investment

   0    3,133    0  

Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired, and investments in joint ventures

  (38,384  (20,282  (4,835

Proceeds from disposals of land, buildings, etc.

  0    8,737    0  

Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents.

  1,126    (14,283  0  

Proceeds from short-term investments.

  9,997    17,820    4,885  

Investment in short-term investments

   (4,885  (2,500  (15,320  (17  (10,000  0  

Other investing activities

  (546  0    0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (44,477  (56,237  (41,266  (49,854  (35,181  (25,122
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

       

Repayments on revolving line of credit

   (339,000  (668,000  (10,000  (312,000  (301,000  (368,000

Borrowings on revolving line of credit

   304,000    703,000    10,000    312,000    278,000    391,000  

Repayments of long-term debt

   (353  (335  (407,924  (50,289  (367  (332

Issuance of long-term debt

   49,312    0    400,000  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   2,129    1,675    1,294    200    1,165    613  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

   1,881    945    836    2,154    498    388  

Repurchase of common stock, including shares surrendered for tax withholding

   (24,829  (108,727  (66,901  (18,497  (2,332  (2,731

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

   0    (1,500  (2,761  (1,680  (633  (629

Payment of financing costs

   (1,715  (1,055  (12,711  (258  (3,090  0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (8,575  (73,997  (88,167

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

  (68,370  (27,759  20,309  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents

   327    (203  (4  (317  (7  (224
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   36,444    (79,429  5,792    (31,092  63,520    (33,319

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   12,031    91,460    85,668    78,676    15,156    48,475  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $48,475   $12,031   $91,460   $47,584   $78,676   $15,156  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Supplemental information:

       

Cash paid for interest

  $40,930   $37,936   $31,572   $39,855   $41,549   $42,960  

Cash paid for income taxes – net of refunds

   (8,048  (947  10,415    3,192    826    (2,493

Non-cash investing activities:

    

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

   

Capital expenditures incurred but not paid

   1,677    1,974    2,098    2,087    238    926  

Non-cash financing activities:

    

Repurchased shares not yet settled

   0    2,211    889  

Liability for contingent performance based payments

  (101  249    4,165  

Restricted share stock bonus

   948    0    0    0    4,086    9,579  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fiscal Years Ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015,

September 24, 201127, 2014, and September 25, 201028, 2013

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization – Central Garden & Pet Company (“Central”), a Delaware corporation, and subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a leading marketer and producer of quality branded products forand distributor of third party products in the pet and lawn and garden supplies markets.

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Central and all majority-owned subsidiaries. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities are recognized for the share of assets, liabilities and operating results not owned by Central. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The fiscal year ended September 29, 2012 included 53 weeks and the fiscal years ended September 24, 201126, 2015, September 27, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 each included 52 weeks.

Noncontrolling Interest – Noncontrolling interest in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements represents the 20% interest not owned by the Company in a consolidated subsidiary. Since the Company controls this subsidiary, its financial statements are fully consolidated with those of the Company, and the noncontrolling owner’s 20% share of the subsidiary’s net assets and results of operations is deducted and reported as noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets and as net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of operations.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period including realization of accounts receivable and inventory and valuation of goodwill.goodwill and intangibles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition – Sales are recognized when merchandise is shipped, risk of loss and title passes to the customer and the Company has no further obligations to provide services related to such merchandise. Discounts, volume-based rebate incentives and most cooperative advertising amounts are recorded as a reduction of sales. The Company’s current practice on product returns is to accept and credit the return of unopened cases of products from customers where the quantity is small, where the product has been mis-shipped or the product is defective. Provisions are made for estimated sales returns which are deducted from net sales at the time of shipment. Sales also include shipping and handling costs billed directly to customers. The amount billed to customers for shipping and handling costs included in net sales for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September 24, 2011,27, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 was $4.8$5.4 million, $2.7$8.0 million and $1.2$6.9 million, respectively.

Cost of goods sold and occupancy consists of cost of product, inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, certain indirect purchasing, merchandise handling and storage costs, internal transfer costs as well as allocations of overhead costs, including depreciation, related to the Company’s facilities. Cost of goods sold excludes substantially all shipping and handling and out-bound freight costs to customers, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses as delivery expenses. The cost of shipping and handling, including internal costs and payments to third parties, included in delivery expenses within selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 was $54.6$44.4 million, $49.7$45.6 million and $48.6$47.7 million, respectively.

Advertising Costs – The Company expenses the costs of advertising as incurred. Advertising expenses were $54.4$25.0 million, $39.6$30.9 million and $35.9$44.5 million in fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

401(k) Plans– The Company sponsors several 401(k) plans which cover substantially all employees. The Company’s matching contributions expensed under these plans were $2.1 million, for each of the fiscal years 2012 and 2011, and $1.9 million for fiscal year 2010, respectively.2015, $1.9

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

million for fiscal year 2014 and $2.1 million for fiscal years 2013. In fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, the Company’s matching contributions made in the Company’s Class A common stock resulted in the issuance of approximately 230,000, 190,000195,000, 245,000 and 198,000229,000 shares, respectively.

Other income consists principally of earnings from equity method investments and foreign exchange gains and losses.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes result primarily from bad debt allowances, inventory and goodwill write-downs, amortization and nondeductible reserves.depreciation. The Company establishes a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets when management believes it is more likely than not a deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of fiscal 2012year-end 2015 and 2011,2014, the Company had valuation allowances related to various state and foreign net deferred tax assets of $7.3$6.2 million and $7.5$6.2 million, respectively.

U. S. income taxes have not been provided on undistributed earnings (approximately $2.3 million at September 26, 2015) of our foreign subsidiary since all such earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested overseas. The Company has no undistributedpotential deferred tax liability associated with these earnings, net of foreign earnings.tax credits associated with the earnings, is approximately $0.4 million.

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.

Restricted cash and cash equivalentsinclude cash and highly liquid instruments that are used as collateral for stand–alone letter of credit agreements.

Short term investmentsinclude investments with original maturities greater than three months and remaining maturities of one year or less. Short-term investments classified as held-to-maturity are financial instruments that the Company has the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost and are not remeasured to fair value on a recurring basis.

Accounts receivableare carried at their estimated collectible amounts. Trade credit is generally extended on a short-term basis; thus trade receivables do not bear interest, although a finance charge may be applied to such receivables that are past due.

Allowance for doubtful accounts – Trade accounts receivable are regularly evaluated for collectability based on past credit history with customers, their expected returns and their current financial condition.

Inventories, which primarily consist of garden products and pet supplies finished goods, are stated at the lower of FIFO cost or market. Cost includes certain indirect purchasing, merchandise handling and storage costs incurred to acquire or manufacture inventory, costs to unload, process and put away shipments received in order to prepare them to be picked for orders, and certain other overhead costs. The amount of such costs capitalized to inventory is computed based on an estimate of costs related to the procurement and processing of inventory to prepare it for sale compared to total product purchases.

Land, buildings, improvements and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over thirty years for buildings. Improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the terms of the related leases. Depreciation on equipment and capitalized software is computed by the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years.

Long-Lived Assets – The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including amortizable and indefinite-lived intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, for potential impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, and annually

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

for indefinite-lived intangible assets. An impairment loss would be recognized for amortizable intangible assets andassetsand property, plant and equipment when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset are less than its carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized for an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life if its carrying value exceeds its fair value. Impairment, if any, is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. TheDue to the changes in the Company’s operations and related plans for future SAP implementations, the Company has recorded asset impairment charges whendetermined that certain software costs previously capitalized had no future value, and accordingly, wrote off capitalized costs of $5.9 million in the carrying valuefourth quarter of an asset was in excess of its fair value.fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2010,2015, the Company recognized a non-cash $12.0$7.3 million impairment charge to itscertain indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of increased competition in the continuing challenging economic environment.marketplace and declining volume of sales. The fair value of the remaining $15.0 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets that were impaired exceeded their carrying value at September 26, 2015. Should market conditions or the assumptions used

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

by the Company in determining the fair value of assets change, or management changes plans regarding the future use of certain assets, additional charges to operations may be required in the period in which such conditions occur. See Note 910 – Other Intangible Assets.

Land, buildings, improvements and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over thirty years for buildings. Improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the terms of the related leases. Depreciation on equipment and capitalized software is computed by the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years.

Goodwill represents the excess of cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations are recorded based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is not subject to amortization but must be evaluated for impairment annually. The Company tests for goodwill impairment annually or whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. See Note 89 – Goodwill.

Investments – The Company owns membership interests approximating 50% in twofour unconsolidated companies. The Company accounts for its interest in these entities using the equity method. Equity income of $0.7$0.4 million in fiscal 2012,2015, $0.6 million in 2014 and $0.9 million in fiscal 2011 and $0.6 million in fiscal 20102013 is included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s investment in these entities was $1.3$16.5 million at September 29, 201226, 2015 and $0.9$0.6 million at September 24, 2011.27, 2014. On a combined basis, the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of these entities are not significant.

Accruals For Insurance – The Company maintains insurance for certain risks, including workers’ compensation, general liability and vehicle liability, and is self-insured for employee related health care benefits. The Company’s workers’ compensation, general liability and vehicle liability insurance policies include deductibles of $250,000 to $350,000 per occurrence. The Company maintains excess loss insurance that covers any health care claims in excess of $700,000 per person per year. The Company establishes reserves for losses based on its claims experience and actuarial estimates of the ultimate loss amount inherent in the claims, including claims incurred but not yet reported. Costs are recognized in the period the claim is incurred, and the financial statement accruals include an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – At September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable and payable, short term borrowings and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company’s senior subordinated notes is based on quoted market prices for these instruments. See Note 32 for further information regarding the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.

Derivative Financial Instruments – The Company reports all derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings, or are deferred, depending on the nature of the underlying exposure being hedged and how effective the derivative is at offsetting a change in the underlying exposure.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company principally uses a combination of purchase orders and various short and long-term supply arrangements in connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain commodities. The Company also enters into commodity futures, options and optionsswap contracts to reduce the volatility of price fluctuations of corn, which impacts the cost of raw materials. The Company’s primary objective when entering into these derivative

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

contracts is to achieve greater certainty with regard to the future price of commodities purchased for use in its supply chain. These derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments.

The Company does not perform the assessments required to achieve hedge accounting for commodity derivative positions. Accordingly, the changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded currently in its consolidated statements of operations. As of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, the notional amount of these contracts was not significant.Company had no outstanding derivative instruments.

Stock-Based Compensation – Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is expensed ratably over the service period of the award. Total compensation costs recognized under all share-based arrangements in fiscal 20122015 was $7.5$8.3 million ($4.75.3 million after tax), fiscal 20112014 was $7.4$7.7 million ($4.44.9 million after tax), and in fiscal 20102013 was $5.6$15.9 million ($3.510.0 million after tax). See Note 1314 for further information.

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)– Total comprehensive income (loss) consists of two components: net income and other comprehensive income.income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are recorded directly as an element of shareholders’ equity, but are excluded from net income. Other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of currency translation adjustments relating to the Company’s foreign subsidiary whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The Company does not have any undistributed foreign earnings.dollar, unrealized gains and losses on investments classified as available for sale, as well as the reclassification of realized gains and losses on investments classified as available for sale to net income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Discontinued Operations

In January 2010,April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08),Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU No. 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This ASU2014-08 provides amended guidance for reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components. The amended guidance raises the threshold for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations and permits significant continuing involvement and continuing cash flows with the discontinued operation. In addition, the amended guidance requires additional disclosures for discontinued operations and new disclosures regarding transfers in and outfor individually material disposal transactions that do not meet the definition of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, as well as requiring presentation on gross basis information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in Level 3 fair value measurements.a discontinued operation. The ASU also clarifies existing disclosures regarding level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. The ASUamended guidance is effective for annual periods and interim andperiods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 20092014 and became effective for the Company on DecemberSeptember 27, 2009. Disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and were effective for the Company on September 25, 2011.2015. The adoption of the applicable sections of this ASU did notASC may have a materialan impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.accounting for any future discontinued operations the Company may have.

Revenue Recognition

In December 2010,May 2014, the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Update No. 2010-28, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – When to Perform Step 22014-09 (ASU 2014-09),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This update was issued as Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606. The core principle of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”). The amendments in this update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entityamendment is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicatingrecognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that an impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effectivereflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010 and was effective for the Company on September 25, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011,goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB issueddeferred the effective date of ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU provides guidance related to fair value measurement that changes the wording used to describe many requirements in GAAP2014-09 for measuring and disclosing fair values. Additionally, the amendments clarify the

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending September 28, 2019. Early adoption is not permitted before the original effective date. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock Based Compensation

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12 (ASU 2014-12),Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a PerformanceTarget Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, or the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2017. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Consolidation

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02), Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis to ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. ASU 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2015, or the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03(ASU 2015-03), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This standard amends the existing guidance to require that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of as a deferred charge. In August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-15, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). This ASU provides additional guidance on ASU 2015-03 with respect to line of credit arrangements, whereby specify debt issuance costs as part of line-of-credit arrangements may continue to be deferred and presented as an asset on the balance sheet. Recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. These ASUs are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, or the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. As of September 26, 2015, the Company had approximately $3.4 million of net deferred financing costs that would be reclassified from a long-term asset to a reduction in the carrying amount of its debt upon adoption of the standard.

Cloud Computing Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05(ASU 2015-05),Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

applicationArrangement. This standard clarifies the circumstances under which a cloud computing customer would account for the arrangement as a license of existing fair value measurement requirements. The amended guidanceinternal-use software under ASC 350-40. ASU 2015-05 is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods therein beginning after December 15, 2015, or the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may adopt the guidance either retrospectively or prospectively to arrangements entered into, or materially modified after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2015-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Inventory Measurement

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 (ASU 2015-11),Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. Under ASU 2015-11, inventory will be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. The standard defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. ASU 2015-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.2016, or the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted this guidance atis currently evaluating the beginningimpact the adoption of its second fiscal quarter of 2012. Adoption of this guidance did notASU 2015-11 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statement disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” ASU No. 2011-05 requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements, eliminating the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. Under either choice, items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income are required to be presented on the face of the financial statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued an update to ASU No. 2011-05, ASU No. 2011-12, which was issued to defer the effective date for amendments to the reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU No. 2011-05. ASU 2011-05 and the amendments in ASU No. 2011-12 are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and became effective for the Company on September 30, 2012. The guidance will be applied retrospectively. This amendment will change the manner in which the Company presents comprehensive income and will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations

In September 2011,2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill2015-16 (ASU 2015-16),Simplifying the Accounting for Impairment, which amendedMeasurement-Period Adjustments. ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the guidancemeasurement period after an acquisition within the reporting period they are determined. This is a change from the previous requirement that the adjustments be recorded retrospectively. The ASU also requires disclosure of the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income effects, if any, as a result of the annual testing of goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows companiesadjustment to assess qualitative factors to determinethe provisional amounts, calculated as if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. The guidancehad been completed at the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal yearsannual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2011, and became effective for the Company on September 30, 2012.2015; early adoption is permitted. The Company has determined that this newearly adopted the guidance did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued an ASU No. 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which simplifies the manner in which companies test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.prospectively as of September 27, 2015. The ASU permits companies to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. The ASU is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The guidance became effective for the Company on September 30, 2012. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard will impact the ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.Company’s accounting for measurement period adjustments for any future business combinations.

2. Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. ASC 820 requiresGenerally accepted accounting principles require financial assets and liabilities to be categorized based on the inputs used to calculate their fair values as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk).

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and equivalents, restricted cash and equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable and payable, derivative instruments, short-term borrowings, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value because of their short-term nature.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Company had short- term investments, consisting of bank certificates of deposit,following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 2 inputs inon a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of September 29, 2012.26, 2015 (in thousands):

       Level 1           Level 2           Level 3           Total     

Liabilities:

        

Liability for contingent consideration (b)

  $        0    $        0    $3,625    $3,625  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $0    $0    $3,625    $3,625  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of September 27, 2014 (in thousands):

       Level 1           Level 2           Level 3           Total     

Assets:

        

Short-term investments (a)

  $9,990    $        0    $0    $9,990  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $9,990    $0    $0    $9,990  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

        

Liability for contingent consideration (b)

  $0    $0    $4,414    $4,414  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $0    $0    $4,414    $4,414  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(a)The fair value of short-term investments are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
(b)The liability for contingent consideration relates to an earn-out for B2E, acquired in December 2012 – See Note 4. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement is determined based on the Company’s evaluation as to the probability and amount of any earn-out that will be achieved based on expected future performance by the acquired entity. This is presented as part of long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of our Level 3 financial instruments for the years ended September 26, 205 and September 27, 2014 (in thousands):

   Amount 

Balance as of September 27, 2014

  $4,414  

Performance-based payments made

   (688

Changes in the fair value of contingent performance-based payments established at the time of acquisition

   (101
  

 

 

 

Balance as of September 26, 2015

  $3,625  
  

 

 

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

Financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include short-term held-to-maturity investments that are carried at amortized cost and are not remeasured to fair value on a recurring basis. There were no fair value adjustments to these financial assets during 2012.

The Company measures certain non-financial assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets, at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are used primarily in the impairment analyses of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets using discounted cash flows with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. InDuring the fiscal 2010,

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

year ended September 26, 2015, the carrying valuevalues of $26.9$22.3 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets were written down to their estimated fair value of $14.9$15.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $12.0$7.3 million, which was included in earnings for the period. See Note 10 – Other Intangible Assets.

During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2013, the Company recognized a non-cash charge of $7.7 million, as the carrying value of its Garden segment goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill. The fair market value of these non-financial assets was determined using an income approach and Level 3 inputs, which required management to make significant estimates about future cash flows. See Note 9 – Goodwill.

3.Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and equivalents, short term investments consisting of bank certificates of deposit and held-to-maturity debt securities, accounts receivable and payable, short-term borrowings, and accrued liabilities. The carryingIn January 2015, the Company called $50 million aggregate principal amount of these instruments approximatesthe 2018 Notes for redemption on March 1, 2015 at a price of 102.063%. The estimated fair value because of their short-term nature.

the Company’s remaining $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes as of September 26, 2015 was $410.5 million, compared to a carrying value of $399.7 million. The estimated fair value of the Company’s $450 million 8.25 % senior subordinated notes dueprincipal amount of 2018 Notes as of September 29, 201227, 2014 was $482.6$459.5 million, compared to a carrying value of $449.3$449.5 million. The estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices for these notes.notes, which are Level 1 inputs within the fair value hierarchy.

3. Derivative Instruments

Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives. The utilization of these financial transactions is governed by policies covering acceptable counterparty exposure, instrument types and other practices. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes. The Company performs assessments of its counterparty credit risk regularly, including a review of credit ratings and potential nonperformance of the counterparty, and minimizes counterparty concentrations.

Commodity and commodity index futures, swaps and option contracts are used to economically hedge commodity input prices on grains and proteins. These derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. Generally, the Company economically hedges a portion of its anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 12 months. As of September 26, 2015 and September 27, 2014, the Company had no outstanding derivative instruments.

The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of normal purchases and normal sales expected to result in physical delivery. The Company’s derivative financial instruments have not been designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. The Company recognizes realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption in other income (expense) on the consolidated statement of operations.

During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2013, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $1.0 million in other income (expense) related to commodity contracts.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

4. Acquisitions and Investments in Joint Ventures

Fiscal 20122015

Purishield LLC and Ceregenin LLC

On December 30, 2014, the Company invested $16.0 million in cash for a 50% interest in two newly formed entities. The two entities own rights to commercialize products which incorporate features covered by certain patents, technology and associated intellectual property rights in the fields of animal health and pesticide applications. The investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is not expected to contribute to earnings in the near future.

IMS Trading Corp

On July 31, 2015, the Company made no acquisitions during fiscal 2012.purchased substantially all of the assets of IMS Trading Corp. for a purchase price of approximately $23 million. IMS Trading Corp was a manufacturer, importer and distributor of rawhide, natural dog treats and pet products throughout the United States and internationally. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $4.9 million, which is included in deferred taxes and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of September 26, 2015, as the Company has not yet finalized the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the intangible assets acquired. This acquisition is expected to complement the Company’s existing dog and cat business.

Fiscal 20112014

Envincio LLC

On February 28, 2011,April 1, 2014, the Company purchased certain assets of Envincio LLC, including brands, EPA registrations, inventory and trade receivables, for approximately $20.3 million. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired by approximately $3.3 million, which is recorded in goodwill. Financial results for Envincio have been included in the results of operations within the Pet segment since the date of acquisition. This acquisition is expected to enable the Company to be a key supplier and product innovator in the growing natural insecticides product market, often characterized as EPA-exempt products, and expand its offerings in traditional pesticides.

The following table summarizes the recording of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date and subsequent adjustments:

(In thousands)

  Amounts
Previously
Recognized as of
Acquisition
Date (1)
  Measurement
Period
Adjustments
  Amounts
Recognized as  of
Acquisition Date
(as Adjusted)
 

Current assets, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired

  $6,650   $0   $6,650  

Fixed assets

   20    0    20  

Goodwill

   2,477    856    3,333  

Intangible assets

   12,306    (856  11,450  

Current liabilities

   (1,170  0    (1,170
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired, less cash and cash equivalents

  $20,283   $0   $20,283  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)As previously reported in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended September 27, 2014.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During fiscal 2015, the fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Envincio LLC as of the acquisition date were finalized. This refinement did not have a significant impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations, balance sheets or cash flows in any period and, therefore, the Company has not retrospectively adjusted its financial statements.

Fiscal 2013

In December 2012, the Company acquired certain assets of a privately-held maker of premium fertilizer for the professional and retail marketsremaining majority interest in FourStar Microbial Products, LLC (Four Star Microbial) for approximately $23$4.8 million in cash. The acquired assets were integrated into the businesscash and approximately $4.2 million of Pennington Seed, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.contingent future performance-based payments. The purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired by $1.0$3.2 million, which was recorded as goodwill.

Contingent performance payments The operating results of $1.9 million were paid in fiscal 2011 for previous acquisitions and recorded as goodwill in fiscal 2011.

Fiscal 2010

TheFourStar Microbial had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In the future, the Company made no acquisitions during fiscal 2010. Contingent performance paymentsexpects the acquisition will enhance its capability to service professional providers of $1.8 million were paid for acquisitions made in prior years, which were recorded as goodwill in fiscal 2010.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

mosquito abatement.

5. Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers and Suppliers

Customer Concentration – Approximately 45%40% of the Company’s net sales for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and 46% of the Company’s net sales2015, 41% for fiscal year 20102014 and 43% for fiscal 2013 were derived from sales to the Company’s top five customers. The Company’s largest customer accounted for approximately 17%16%, 16%17% and 17%16% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal years 2012, 2011and 2010,2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s second largest customer in 2015 accounted for approximately 9%8%, 12%7% and 10%8% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal years 2012, 2011and 2010,2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s third largest customer in 2015 accounted for approximately 7% of the Company’s net sales in each of the fiscal years 2012 and 2011,, 8% and 8% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2010.years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The loss of, or significant adverse change in, the relationship between thebetweenthe Company and any of these three customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial results. The loss of or reduction in orders from any significant customer, losses arising from customer disputes regarding shipments, fees, merchandise condition or related matters, or the Company’s inability to collect accounts receivable from any major customer could also have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and financial results. As of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, accounts receivable from the Company’s top five customers comprised approximately 42%35% and 40%37% of the Company’s total accounts receivable, including 15%12% and 11% from the Company’s largest customer.

Supplier Concentration – While the Company purchases products from many different manufacturers and suppliers, approximately 9%11%, 12%10% and 9%11% of the Company’s cost of goods sold in fiscal years 2012, 2011and 2010,2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were derived from products purchased from the Company’s five largest suppliers.

6. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are summarized below (in thousands):

 

Description

  Balances at
Beginning
of Period
   Charged/
(Credited) to
Costs and
Expenses
  Asset
Write-Offs,
Less
Recoveries
  Balances
at End of
Period
 

Fiscal year ended September 25, 2010

  $18,014    $5,647   $(2,097 $21,564  

Fiscal year ended September 24, 2011

   21,564     (3,662  (2,312  15,590  

Fiscal year ended September 29, 2012

   15,590     5,291    (2,307  18,574  

Description

  Balances at
Beginning
of Period
   Charged/
(Credited)  to
Costs and
Expenses
   Asset
Write-Offs,
Less
Recoveries
  Balances at
End of
Period
 

Fiscal year ended September 28, 2013

   18,574     4,373     (1,789  21,158  

Fiscal year ended September 27, 2014

   21,158     8,988     (4,934  25,212  

Fiscal year ended September 26, 2015

   25,212     741     (6,657  19,296  

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

7. Inventories, net

Inventories, net of allowance for obsolescence, consist of the following (in thousands):

   September 26,
2015
   September 27,
2014
 

Raw materials

  $94,969    $93,678  

Work in progress

   15,268     13,397  

Finished goods

   215,673     207,818  

Supplies

   10,036     11,493  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total inventories, net

  $335,946    $326,386  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

8. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):

 

  As of 
  September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
   September 26,
2015
 September 27,
2014
 

Land

  $9,504   $9,254    $9,306   $8,678  

Buildings and improvements

   108,122    100,439     111,605    109,618  

Transportation equipment

   6,125    6,550     5,130    5,388  

Machine and warehouse equipment

   174,411    168,475     184,556    163,783  

Capitalized software

   99,090    82,936     107,965    107,271  

Office furniture and equipment

   26,076    26,031     26,556    25,091  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 
   423,328    393,685     445,118    419,829  

Accumulated Depreciation

   (232,165  (217,283

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (282,309  (252,980
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 
  $191,163   $176,402    $162,809   $166,849  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense, including the amortization of intangible assets, charged to operations was $33.7 million, $35.8 million and $33.0 million for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Depreciation and amortization expense charged to operations was $30.4 million, $28.6 million and $28.9 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

8.9. Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 (in thousands):

 

  Garden Products
Segment
 Pet Products
Segment
 Total 

Balance as of September 26, 2009

    

Goodwill

  $210,673   $398,928   $609,601  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (205,874  (195,978  (401,852
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   4,799    202,950    207,749  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions (reductions) in fiscal 2010

   881    (1,311  (430

Balance as of September 25, 2010

    

Goodwill

   211,554    397,617    609,171  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (205,874  (195,978  (401,852
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   5,680    201,639    207,319  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions in fiscal 2011

   2,029    875    2,904  

Balance as of September 24, 2011

    

Goodwill

   213,583    398,492    612,075  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (205,874  (195,978  (401,852
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   7,709    202,514    210,223  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   Garden Products
Segment
 Pet Products
Segment
 Total 

Balance as of September 29, 2012

        

Goodwill

   213,583    398,492    612,075    $213,583   $398,492   $612,075  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (205,874  (195,978  (401,852   (205,874  (195,978  (401,852
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
  $7,709   $202,514   $210,223     7,709    202,514    210,223  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions in fiscal 2013

   0    3,242    3,242  

Impairment losses in fiscal 2013

   (7,709  0    (7,709

Balance as of September 28, 2013

    

Goodwill

   213,583    401,734    615,317  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (213,583  (195,978  (409,561
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   0    205,756    205,756  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions in fiscal 2014

   0    2,477    2,477  

Balance as of September 27, 2014

    

Goodwill

   213,583    404,211    617,794  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (213,583  (195,978  (409,561
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   0    208,233    208,233  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions in fiscal 2015

   0    856    856  

Balance as of September 26, 2015

    

Goodwill

   213,583    405,067    618,650  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (213,583  (195,978  (409,561
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  $0   $209,089   $209,089  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions or reductions to goodwill include acquisitions, purchase price adjustments and adjustments of amounts upon finalization of purchase accounting.

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually (on the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter), or whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, by initially comparing the fair value of each of the Company’s four reporting units to their related carrying values. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the Company performs an additional step to determine the implied fair value of goodwill associated with that reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by first allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities and then computing the excess of the reporting unit’s fair value over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, such excess represents the amount of goodwill impairment, and, accordingly, the Company recognizes such impairment. The Company’s goodwill impairment analysis also includes a comparison of the aggregate estimated fair value of all four reporting units to the Company’s total market capitalization.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The estimate of fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units is based on the Company’s projection of revenues, gross margin, operating costs and cash flows considering historical and estimated future results,

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

general economic and market conditions as well as the impact of planned business and operational strategies. The

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Company bases its fair value estimates on assumptions the Company believes to be reasonable at the time, but such assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainty. Assumptions critical to the Company’s fair value estimates were: (i) discount rates used in determining the fair value of the reporting units; (ii) estimated future cash flows; and (iii) projected revenue and operating profit growth rates used in the reporting unit models. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The valuations employ present value techniques to measure fair value and consider market factors.

In connection with the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing performed during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010,2015, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of the Company’s reporting segments exceeded their carrying value by more than 10%, and accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required.

In connection with the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing performed during fiscal 2014, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of the Company’s reporting segments exceeded their carrying value by more than 10%, and accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required.

In connection with the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing performed during fiscal 2013, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of the Company’s Pet segment reporting units exceeded their carrying value, and accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required for the Pet segment. However, the carrying value of the Company’s Garden segment reporting units exceeded their fair value, indicating potential impairment. Based on further analysis, it was determined that the entire carrying value of the Company’s Garden segment goodwill was impaired, resulting in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $7.7 million.

Changes in the judgments and estimates underlying ourthe Company’s analysis of goodwill for possible impairment, including expected future cash flows and discount rate, could result in a significantly different estimate of the fair value of the reporting units in the future and could result in additional impairment of goodwill.

9.CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

10. Other Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the components of gross and net acquired intangible assets:

 

  Gross   Accumulated
Amortization
 Impairment Net
Carrying
Value
   Gross   Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated
Impairment
 Net
Carrying
Value
 
      (in millions)           (in millions)     

September 29, 2012

      

September 26, 2015

      

Marketing-related intangible assets – amortizable

  $12.3    $(7.5 $0   $4.8    $14.1    $(10.4 $0   $3.7  

Marketing-related intangible assets – nonamortizable

   59.6     0    (16.9  42.7     59.6     0    (24.2  35.4  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   71.9     (7.5  (16.9  47.5     73.7     (10.4  (24.2  39.1  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Customer-related intangible assets – amortizable

   42.7     (15.4  0    27.3     43.3     (22.3  0    21.0  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other acquired intangible assets – amortizable

   10.8     (6.7  0    4.1     19.3     (10.5  0    8.8  

Other acquired intangible assets – nonamortizable

   1.2     0    (1.2  0     7.8     0    (1.2  6.6  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   12.0     (6.7  (1.2  4.1     27.1     (10.5  (1.2  15.4  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other intangible assets

  $126.6    $(29.6 $(18.1 $78.9    $144.1    $(43.2 $(25.4 $75.5  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

September 24, 2011

      

September 27, 2014

      

Marketing-related intangible assets – amortizable

  $12.3    $(6.3 $0   $6.0    $15.5    $(9.9 $0   $5.6  

Marketing-related intangible assets – nonamortizable

   59.6     0    (16.9  42.7     59.6     0    (16.9  42.7  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   71.9     (6.3  (16.9  48.7     75.1     (9.9  (16.9  48.3  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Customer-related intangible assets – amortizable

   42.7     (13.0  0    29.7     42.8     (20.2  0    22.6  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other acquired intangible assets – amortizable

   10.8     (4.7  0    6.1     19.4     (8.8  0    10.6  

Other acquired intangible assets – nonamortizable

   1.2     0    (1.2  0     7.7     0    (1.2  6.5  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   12.0     (4.7  (1.2  6.1     27.1     (8.8  (1.2  17.1  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other intangible assets

  $126.6    $(24.0 $(18.1 $84.5    $145.0    $(38.9 $(18.1 $88.0  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other acquired intangible assets acquired include contract-based and technology-based intangible assets.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANYAs part of its acquisition of Envincio, LLC during the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company acquired approximately $1.7 million of marketing related intangible assets and $9.8 million of other intangible assets. See Note 4 – Acquisitions.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In fiscal 2015, the Company recognized a non-cash $7.3 million impairment charge to certain indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of increased competition in the marketplace and declining volume of sales. The fair value of the remaining $15.0 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets that were impaired exceeded their carrying value at September 26, 2015.

The Company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from 1 to 25 years; over weighted average remaining lives of six years for marketing-related intangibles, 14 years for customer-related intangibles and 14 years for other acquired intangibles. Amortization expense for intangibles subject to amortization was approximately $4.3 million, $4.3 million and $5.1 million, for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and is classified within operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Estimated annual amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets in each of the succeeding five years is estimated to be approximately $4 million per year from fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2020.

The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including amortizable and indefinite-lived intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company evaluates indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis. InFor fiscal 2012,2014 and 2013, the Company tested its indefinite-lived intangible assets and no impairment was indicated. Other factors indicating the carrying value of the Company’s amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable were not present in fiscal 2012,2015, and accordingly, no impairment testing was performed on these assets.

The Company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from 1 to 25 years; over weighted average remaining lives of seven years for marketing-related intangibles, 17 years for customer-related intangibles and five years for other acquired intangibles. Amortization expense for intangibles subject to amortization was approximately $5.6 million, $5.0 million and $4.6 million, for fiscal 2012, 2011and 2010, respectively, and is classified within operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Estimated annual amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets in each of the succeeding five years is estimated to be approximately $5 million per year from fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2017.

10.11. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

   September 29,
2012
  September 24,
2011
 
   (in thousands) 

Senior subordinated notes, net of unamortized discount(1), interest at 8.25%, payable semi-annually, principal due March 2018

  $449,312   $400,000  

Revolving credit facility, interest at Alternate Base Rate plus a margin of 0.75% to 1.75%, or LIBOR plus a margin of 1.75% to 2.75%, final maturity June 2016

   0    35,000  

Other notes payable

   502    609  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   449,814    435,609  

Less current portion

   (331  (279
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term portion

  $449,483   $435,330  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Represents unamortized original issue discount of $688, as of September 29, 2012, which is amortizable until March 2018.

Senior Credit Facility

On June 8, 2011, the Company amended its $275 million, five-year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) included in its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). Under the modified terms, the Credit Facility has a borrowing capacity of $375 million, an increase of $100 million, and an extension of maturity date by approximately one year, to June 2016. As amended, the Credit Facility bears lower interest rates and commitment fees and requires less interest coverage. The Company continues to have the option to increase the size of the Credit Facility by an additional $200 million of incremental term loans and/or revolving loans should it exercise its option and one or more lenders are willing to make such increased amounts available to it. There was no outstanding balance as of September 29, 2012 under the Credit Facility. There were no letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility as of September 29, 2012. There were other letters of credit of $15.7 million outstanding as of September 29, 2012. As of September 29, 2012, there were $375.0 million of unused commitments under the Credit Facility or, after giving effect to the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement, $225.5 million of remaining borrowing capacity.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Interest on the amended Credit Facility is based, at the Company’s option, on a rate equal to the Alternate Base Rate (ABR), which is the greatest of the prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 1/2 of 1% or one month LIBOR plus 1%, plus a margin, which fluctuates from 0.75% to 1.75%, or LIBOR plus a margin, which fluctuates from 1.75% to 2.75% and commitment fees that range from 0.30% to 0.50%, determined quarterly based on consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent trailing 12-month period. As of September 29, 2012, the applicable interest rate on the Credit Facility related to alternate base rate borrowings was 5.0%, and the applicable interest rate related to LIBOR rate borrowings was 3.0%.

The Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Company’s material subsidiaries and is secured by the Company’s assets, excluding real property but including substantially all of the capital stock of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains certain financial and other covenants which require the Company to maintain minimum levels of interest coverage and maximum levels of senior debt to EBITDA and that restrict the Company’s ability to repurchase its stock, make investments in or acquisitions of other businesses and pay dividends above certain levels over the life of the Credit Facility. Under the terms of the Company’s Credit Facility, it may make restricted payments, including cash dividends and stock repurchases, in an aggregate amount initially not to exceed $200 million over the life of the Credit Facility, subject to qualifications and baskets as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of September 29, 2012, the Company’s Total Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, was 4.0 to 1.0, and the Company’s Senior Secured Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement with a maximum of 2.0 to 1.0, was 0.01 to 1.0. The Company’s minimum Interest Coverage Ratio was reduced to 2.50 times, from 2.75 times as part of the modification of the Credit Facility. As of September 29, 2012, the Company’s Interest Coverage ratio was 2.9 times. Apart from the covenants limiting restricted payments and capital expenditures, the Credit Facility does not restrict the use of retained earnings or net income. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 29, 2012.

   September 26,
2015
  September 27,
2014
 
   (in thousands) 

Senior subordinated notes, net of unamortized discount of $309 and $471, interest at 8.25%, payable semi-annually, principal due March 2018

  $399,691   $449,529  

Asset-based revolving credit facility, interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% to 1.75% or Base Rate plus a margin of 0.25% to 0.75%, final maturity December 2018

   0    0  

Other notes payable

   448    710  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   400,139    450,239  

Less current portion

   (291  (291
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term portion

  $399,848   $449,948  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

On March 8, 2010, the Company issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 8.25% senior subordinated notes due March 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”).

On February 8,13, 2012, the Company issued an additional $50 million aggregate principal amount of its 2018 Notes at a price of 98.501%, plus accrued interest from September 1, 2011, in a private placement. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to pay a portion of the outstanding balance under its Credit Facility.

The Company incurred approximately $1.7 million of debt issuance costs in conjunction with this offering, which included underwriter fees and legal, accounting and rating agency expenses. The debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2018 notes.

The 2018 Notes requirerequired semiannual interest payments, which commenced on September 1, 2010. The 2018 Notes arewere unsecured senior subordinated obligations and arewere subordinated to all of the Company’s existing and future senior debt, including the Company’s Credit Facility. The obligations under the 2018 Notes arewere fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries with certain exceptions. The guarantees arewere general unsecured senior subordinated obligations of the guarantors and arewere subordinated to all existing and future senior debt of the guarantors.

In March 2015, the Company redeemed $50.0 million of its 2018 Notes at a price of 102.063% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company recognized a charge in interest expense of approximately $1.6 million in its second quarter of fiscal 2015 related to the payment of the call premium and the non-cash write-off of unamortized financing costs.

The Company maycould redeem some or all of the remaining 2018 Notes at any time prior to March 1, 2014 at the principal amount plus a “make whole” premium. The Company may redeem some or all of the 2018 Notes at any time on or after March 1, 2014 for 104.125%, after March 1, 2015 for 102.063% and on or after March 1, 2016 for 100%, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Additionally, at any time prior to March 1, 2013, the Company may redeem up to

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

35% of the 2018 Notes with any proceeds the Company receives from certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 108.25% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The holders of the 2018 Notes havehad the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the 2018 Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the repurchase date upon the occurrence of a change of control.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The 2018 Notes containcontained customary high yield covenants, including covenants limiting debt incurrence and restricted payments, subject to certain baskets and exceptions. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants in the 2018 Notes indenture as of September 29, 2012.26, 2015.

Issuance of $400 Million 6.125% Senior Notes

On November 9, 2015, the Company issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due November 2023 (the “2023 Notes”). The 2023 Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by each of its existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries which are borrowers under or guarantors of Central’s senior secured revolving credit facility. Central used the net proceeds from the offering to redeem its outstanding 2018 Notes. See Note 21 – Subsequent Event.

Asset Backed Loan Facility

On December 5, 2013, the Company entered into a credit agreement which provides up to a $390 million principal amount senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, with up to an additional $200 million principal amount available with the consent of the Lenders if the Company exercises the accordion feature set forth therein (collectively, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures on December 5, 2018 and replaced the Company’s prior revolving credit facility. The Company may borrow, repay and reborrow amounts under the Credit Facility until its maturity date, at which time all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility must be repaid in full. As of September 26, 2015, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. There were no letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility as of September 26, 2015. There were other letters of credit of $6.0 million outstanding as of September 26, 2015.

The Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base, calculated using a formula based upon eligible receivables and inventory, minus certain reserves and subject to restrictions. The borrowing availability as of September 26, 2015 was $307 million. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at an index based on LIBOR or, at the option of the Company, the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the SunTrust prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% and (c) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%), plus, in either case, an applicable margin based on the Company’s total outstanding borrowings. Such applicable margin for LIBOR-based borrowings fluctuates between 1.25%-1.75% (and was 1.25% at September 26, 2015) and such applicable margin for Base Rate borrowings fluctuates between 0.25%-0.75% (and was 0.25% at September 26, 2015). As of September 26, 2015, the applicable interest rate related to Base Rate borrowings was 3.5%, and the applicable interest rate related to LIBOR-based borrowings was 1.4%.

The Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including financial covenants which require the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00:1.00 upon reaching certain borrowing levels. The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all assets of the Company. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility during the fiscal year ended September 26, 2015.

The Company incurred approximately $3.1 million of costs in conjunction with this transaction, which included banking fees and legal expenses. These costs will be amortized over the term of the Credit Facility.

The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $1.7 million for the three month period ended December 28, 2013 as part of interest expense, related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs under the prior revolving credit facility.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt as of September 29, 201226, 2015 are as follows:

 

   (in thousands) 

Fiscal year:

  

2013

  $331  

2014

   138  

2015

   30  

2016

   2  

2017

   0  

Thereafter

   450,000  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $450,501(1) 
  

 

 

 

   (in thousands) 

Fiscal year:

  

2016

  $291  

2017

   110  

2018

   400,030  

2019

   5  

2020

   12  

Thereafter

   0  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $400,448 (1) 
  

 

 

 

 

(1)Debt repayments include an amount in excess of the carrying value of debt and reflect the unamortized portion of the original issue discount on the Senior Subordinated2018 Notes of $0.7$0.3 million as of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, which is amortizable until March 2018.

11.12. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Letters of credit–The Company had $15.2$6.0 million of outstanding letters of credit related to normal business transactions at September 29, 2012.26, 2015. These agreements require the Company to maintain specified amounts of cash as collateral in segregated accounts to support the letters of credit issued thereunder, which will affect the amount of cash the Company has available for other uses. The amount of cash collateral in these segregated accounts was $13.2 million and is reflected in “Restricted cash” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Purchase commitments – Production and purchase agreements (primarily for grass seed and grains) entered into in the ordinary course of business obligate the Company to make future purchases based on estimated yields. The terms of these contracts vary and have fixed prices or quantities. At September 29, 2012,26, 2015, estimated annual purchase commitments were $82.2 million for fiscal 2013, $36.2 million for fiscal 2014, $23.3 million for fiscal 2015, $13.6$111.1 million for fiscal 2016, $9.2$39.2 million for fiscal 2017, $24.4 million for fiscal 2018, $15.4 million for fiscal 2019, $6.8 million for fiscal 2020 and $4.5$1.4 million thereafter.

Leases – The Company has operating lease agreements principally for office and warehouse facilities and equipment. Such leases have remaining terms of 1 to 97 years. Rental expense was $23.6$23.1 million for fiscal 2012, $24.42015, $21.3 million for fiscal 20112014, and $26.9$22.4 million for fiscal 2010.2013.

Certain facility leases have renewal options and include escalation clauses. Minimum lease payments include scheduled rent increases pursuant to these escalation provisions.

Aggregate minimum annual payments on non-cancelable operating leases at September 26, 2015 are as follows:

   (in thousands) 

Fiscal year:

  

2016

  $19,163  

2017

   16,031  

2018

   9,470  

2019

   7,959  

2020

   4,487  

Thereafter

   1,025  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $58,135  
  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Aggregate minimum annual payments on non-cancelable operating leases at September 29, 2012 are as follows:

   (in thousands) 

Fiscal year:

  

2013

  $20,038  

2014

   14,441  

2015

   10,024  

2016

   6,838  

2017

   4,370  

Thereafter

   1,982  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $57,693  
  

 

 

 

Contingencies

The Company may from time to time become involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Currently, the Company is not a party to any legal proceedings thatthe resolution of which management believes would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The Company has received notices from several states stating that they have appointed an agent to conduct an examination of the books and records of the Company to determine whether it has complied with state unclaimed property laws. In addition to seeking unclaimed property subject to escheat laws, the states may seek interest, penalties and other relief. The examinations are at an early stage and, as such, management is unable to determine the impact, if any, on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The Company has experienced, and may in the future experience, issues with products that may lead to product liability, recalls, withdrawals, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities. In 2012, The Company recorded approximately $4.9 million of costs related to these recalls. Currently, the Company has not experienced any product liability, recalls, withdrawals or replacementsrecent issues with products the resolution of products thatwhich management believes would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

12.13. Income Taxes

The provision for income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   September 29,
2012
  September 24,
2011
  September 25,
2010
 
   (in thousands) 

Current:

    

Federal.

  $(1,003 $(5,512 $9,293  

State.

   603    160    1,902  

Foreign.

   35    35    67  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (365  (5,317  11,262  

Deferred:

    

Federal.

   12,671    22,667    15,822  

State.

   198    1,214    1,203  

Foreign.

   312    1,031    (177
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   13,181    24,912    16,848  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $12,816   $19,595   $28,110  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   September 26,
2015
   September 27,
2014
  September 28,
2013
 
   (in thousands) 

Current:

     

Federal.

  $2,301    $(329 $52  

State.

   643     873    958  

Foreign.

   25     0    0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   2,969     544    1,010  

Deferred:

     

Federal.

   14,843     4,171    (2,915

State.

   625     177    (687

Foreign.

   98     (847  0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   15,566     3,501    (3,602
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $18,535    $4,045   $(2,592
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  September 29,
2012
 September 24,
2011
 September 25,
2010
   September 26,
2015
 September 27,
2014
 September 28,
2013
 

Statutory federal income tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0   35.0  35.0  (35.0)% 

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

   2.3    2.8    3.2     2.4    2.1    (5.2

Other permanent differences

   0.6    1.4    (0.9   (0.5  0.2    2.4  

Adjustment of prior year accruals

   0.2    1.2    (0.3   (0.5  (0.2  1.8  

Uncertain tax positions

   0.0    (0.3  (0.1   0.0    0.4    3.7  

Credits

   (1.2  (2.9  (0.5   (0.3  (1.6  (29.3

Change in valuation allowances

   (0.1  3.2    0.0     0.0    (5.4  (9.0

Other

   (0.1  0.4    0.6  

Foreign rate differential

   (0.1  (1.3  (3.6
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective income tax rate (benefit)

   36.7  40.8  37.0   36.0  29.2  (74.2%) 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  ��

 

  

 

  

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of “temporary differences” between asset and liability amounts for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as determined based on existing tax laws. The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

  September 29, 2012   September 24, 2011 
  Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
   Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
   September 26, 2015   September 27, 2014 
  (in thousands)   Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
   Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
 

Current:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts .

  $6,741   $0    $5,750   $0  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $7,054   $0    $9,262   $0  

Inventory write-downs

   10,411    0     7,924    0     11,366    0     12,018    0  

Prepaid expenses.

   112    0     626    0     0    651     820    0  

Nondeductible reserves

   997    0     1,064    0     936    0     1,420    0  

State taxes.

   0    245     0    333     0    385     0    165  

Employee benefits

   5,885    0     4,690    0     9,411    0     7,816    0  

Other.

   3,509    0     3,552    0     2,754    0     3,233    0  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   27,655    245     23,606    333     31,521    1,036     34,569    165  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Noncurrent:

            

Depreciation and amortization.

   0    30,358     0    11,665     0    52,415     0    46,458  

Equity income.

   0    280     0    952     0    305     0    127  

State net operating loss carryforward

   4,160    0     4,043    0     5,032    0     5,167    0  

Stock based compensation

   5,225    0     5,416    0     3,422    0     5,263    0  

State credits

   2,241    0     2,267    0     2,348    0     2,352    0  

Other.

   2,866    0     3,461    0     2,463    0     7,281    0  

Valuation allowance

   (7,282  0     (7,450  0     (6,205  0     (6,215  0  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total.

   7,210    30,638     7,737    12,617     7,060    52,720     13,848    46,585  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total.

  $34,865   $30,883    $31,343   $12,950    $38,581   $53,756    $48,417   $46,750  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The Company’sCompany has state tax net operating losses of $80.1$101.5 million which expire at various times between 20122015 and 2032,2035, and foreign losses of $3.5$1.0 million, which do not expire. Pursuant to authoritative guidance, the benefit of stock options will only be recorded to stockholders’ equity when cash taxes payable are reduced.

The Company has federal income tax credits of

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

$0.7 million which expire between 2022 and 2032. The Company also has state income tax credits of $3.4 million. $1.2$3.6 million, of these creditswhich expire at various times beginning in 20122015 through 2029. Credits of $2.2 million do not expire.2031. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover its deferred tax assets, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence including past operating results, future taxable income, and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance against any deferred tax assets. The Company has determined there will be insufficient future separate state and international taxable income for the separate parent company and the Company’s foreign operations to realize its deferred tax assets. Therefore, valuation allowances of $7.3$6.2 million and $7.5$6.2 million (net of federal impact) at September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, respectively, have been provided to reduce state and foreign deferred tax assets to amounts considered recoverable.

The Company classifies uncertain tax positions as non-current income tax liabilities unless expected to be paid within one year. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters as a component of pretax income. As of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 201127, 2014, accrued interest was less than $0.1 million and no penalties were accrued related to uncertain tax positions.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table, which excludes interest and penalties, summarizes the activity related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal years ended September 24, 201126, 2015 and September 29, 201227, 2014 (in thousands):

 

Balance as of September 25, 2010

  $485  

Balance as of September 28, 2013

  $364  

Increases related to prior year tax positions

   195     264  

Increases related to current year tax positions

   64     14  

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

   (308   (166

Settlements

   (154   (388

Decreases related to lapse of statute of limitations

   (1
  

 

   

 

 

Balance as of September 24, 2011

  $282  

Balance as of September 27, 2014

  $87  

Increases related to prior year tax positions

   1     55  

Increases related to current year tax positions

   16     20  

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

   —       0  

Settlements

   (37   (9

Decreases related to lapse of statute of limitations

   (15
  

 

   

 

 

Balance as of September 29, 2012

  $262  

Balance as of September 26, 2015

  $138  
  

 

   

 

 

As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, unrecognized income tax benefits totaled approximately $0.2$0.1 million and all of the unrecognized tax benefits would, if recognized, impact the Company’s effective income tax rate.

The Company is principally subject to taxation by the United States and various states within the United States. The Company’s tax filings in major jurisdictions are open to examination by tax authorities by the Internal Revenue Service from fiscal year ended 20092012 forward and in various state taxing authorities generally from fiscal year ended 20082011 forward.

The Company does not believe there will be any significant change in its unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

13.14. Stock-Based Compensation

In February 2003, the Company adopted theThe Company’s 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”) which, as amended, provides for the grant of options and restricted stock to key employees, directors and consultants of the Company up to an aggregate of 2.55.8 million shares of common stock of the Company. The 2003 Plan is administered by the

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised only of independent directors, and which must approve individual awards to be granted, vesting and exercise of share conditions. In February 2005, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the 2003 Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance there under by 3.3 million shares, resulting in a total of 5.8 million shares authorized for issuance under the 2003 Plan.

In connection with a dividend payable in the form of two shares of the Class A Common Stock for each outstanding share of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on February 5, 2007, the 2003 Plan was amended to include 9,734,982 shares of Class A Common Stock authorized for issuance. In February 2009, the Company’s shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2003 Plan by an additional 5,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and to authorize for issuance 500,000 shares of Preferred Stock. In February 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2003 Plan by an additional 5,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. As a result of theserecent amendments, there is a total of 5,800,000 shares of Common Stock, 19,734,982 shares of Class A Common Stock and 500,000 shares of Preferred Stock authorized under the 2003 Plan. If and when the Company issues any shares of Preferred Stock under the 2003 Plan, it will reduce the amount of Class A Common Stock available for future issuance in an amount equal to the number of shares of Class A Common Stock that are issuable upon conversion of such Preferred Stock. As of September 29, 2012, there were approximately 3.1 million shares of Common Stock, 9.1 million shares of Class A Common Stock and no shares of Preferred Stock reserved for outstanding equity awards, and there were 1.9 million shares of Common Stock, 9.0 million shares of Class A Common Stock and 0.5 million shares of Preferred Stock remaining for future awards.

The Company has a Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”) which provides for the grant of options and restricted stock to nonemployee directors of the Company. The Director Plan, as amended, in 2001 and 2006,

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

provides for the granting to each independent director of options to purchase a number of shares equal to $200,000 divided by the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders and a number of shares of restricted stock equal to $20,000 divided by such fair market value.

As of September 26, 2015, there were approximately 1.5 million shares of Common Stock, 6.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock and no shares of Preferred Stock reserved for outstanding equity awards, and there were approximately 3.4 million shares of Common Stock, 10.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock and 0.5 million shares of Preferred Stock remaining for future awards.

Stock Option Awards

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $7.5$8.3 million, $7.4$7.7 million and $5.6$15.9 million for the years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 2010,28, 2013, respectively, as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 consisted of $3.8$3.3 million, $3.1$2.8 million and $2.5$2.7 million, respectively, for stock options, and $1.7$3.1 million, $2.4$3.0 million and $1.1$11.2 million, respectively, for restricted stock awards. Share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 also includes $2.0$1.9 million, $1.9 million and $1.9$2.0 million, respectively, for the Company’s 401(k) matching contributions.

Prior to fiscal 2008, stock options granted were generally exercisable with a 30 month cliff vesting and 42 month expiration, but were also granted with vesting increments of 20%, 25% or 33% per year beginning two, three or four years from the date of grant and expiring one year after the last increment has vested.

From fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2011, the Company granted stock options under its 2003 Plan that included performance targets and time-based vesting to key employees and executives. The performance-based options contingently vested up to 20% each year over the following 5 years dependent upon service and the achievement of annual or cumulative target performance measures and have contractual lives of 6 years. The target performance measures included various business unit, segment and company-wide performance goals, including adjusted earnings before taxes and net controllable assets. If any of the options subject to the performance target measurements did not vest on any particular vesting date because the Company, segment and/or business unit

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

performance had not been achieved, such options will vest and become exercisable if at the end of the following fiscal year, the cumulative target for that later fiscal year has been achieved. The options were granted at the then-current market price, except for 4.4 million shares that were granted at prices significantly above the grant date market price. Of the options granted in fiscal 2008, approximately 216,000 options scheduled to possibly vest in each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 were amended and were only subject to service vesting conditions. The fair value of each performance-based option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the same option valuation model used for options granted as service vesting only. In fiscal 2011, 100% of the performance options granted in fiscal 2010 that were eligible to vest in fiscal 2011 had vested. In fiscal 2011, approximately 97%, on a cumulative basis, of the performance options granted in fiscal 2009 that were eligible to vest in fiscal 2011 had vested. In fiscal 2011, approximately 99%, on a cumulative basis, of the performance options granted in fiscal 2008 that were eligible to vest in fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2011 had vested.

In March 2012, the Company eliminated all of the past and future performance goals relating to stock options granted from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2011, except for the performance goals relating to the overall Company performance. The Company took this action because, as a result of the Company’s reorganization around functional lines during 2011, the extent to which cumulative performance targets for segments or business units have been or may be achieved has becomebecame difficult or impossible to measure and the changes underway within the Company were not contemplated when the Company granted the options. After the amendment, 20% of the shares covered by each award continue to be performance-based. The time vested component of the options did not change. Approximately 250 employees were affected by the modification, and no additional compensation cost was recorded.

The Company currently estimates the remaining performance-based component of the options granted in fiscal 2008, 2009 and fiscal 2009 are probable of achievement2010 were 100%, 60% and are recording20% achieved, respectively, and the related expense was recorded over the estimated service period. The Company currently estimates the performance-based component of the options granted in fiscal 2010 and 2011 areis not probable of achievement and areis not recording related expense. As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, there were 7.03.3 million of unvested options, of which approximately 1.00.3 million are subject to performance based vesting criteria. To the extent Company goals are or are not achieved, the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the future will be adjusted.

During fiscal 2012,2015, the Company granted time-based stock options with an exercise price based on the closing fair market value on the date of the grant. The majority of the options granted in fiscal 20122015 vest in four annual installments commencing approximately one year from the date of grant and expire approximately six years after the grant date.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Expected stock price volatilities are estimated based on the Company’s historical volatility. The expected term of options granted is based on analyses of historical employee termination rates, option exercises and the contractual term of the option. The risk-free rates are based on U.S. Treasury yields, for notes with comparable terms as the option grants, in effect at the time of the grant. For purposes of this valuation model, no dividends have been assumed.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s calculations were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected life from the date of grant, 3.6 years in fiscal 2015, 3.5 years in fiscal 2012, 3.5 years in fiscal 20112014 and 3.5 years in fiscal 2010;2013; stock price volatility, 37.9%30.3% in fiscal 2012, 36.4%2015, 34.3% in fiscal 20112014 and 37.3%34.8% in fiscal 2010;2013; risk free interest rates, 0.9%1.3% in fiscal 2012, 2.2%2015, 1.6% in fiscal 20112014 and 2.0%1.2% in fiscal 2010;2013; and no dividends during the expected term.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes option activity for the period ended September 29, 2012:26, 2015:

 

   Number of
Shares
(in thousands)
  Weighted
Average Exercise
Price per Share
   Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 

Outstanding at September 24, 2011

   12,110   $10.66     4 years    $2,956  

Granted

   1,937   $9.53      

Exercised

   (1,157 $6.32      

Cancelled or expired

   (1,252 $12.28      
  

 

 

      

Outstanding at September 29, 2012

   11,638   $10.73     3 years    $22,172  
  

 

 

      

Exercisable at September 25, 2010

   3,422   $11.67     2 years    $3,794  

Exercisable at September 24, 2011

   4,162   $11.32     3 years    $1,139  

Exercisable at September 29, 2012

   4,601   $11.34     2 years    $6,708  

Expected to vest after September 29, 2012

   6,305   $10.32     4 years    $2,858  
   Number of
Shares
(in thousands)
  Weighted
Average Exercise
Price per Share
   Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 

Outstanding at September 27, 2014

   9,213   $10.35     3 years    $1,895  

Granted

   1,361   $10.58      

Exercised

   (2,389 $8.86      

Cancelled or expired

   (1,928 $11.86      
  

 

 

      

Outstanding at September 26, 2015

   6,257   $10.51     3 years    $38,663  
  

 

 

      

Exercisable at September 28, 2013

   6,409   $11.21     2 years     770  

Exercisable at September 27, 2014

   5,205   $10.81     2 years     390  

Exercisable at September 26, 2015

   2,910   $10.74     2 years     17,226  

Expected to vest after September 26, 2015

   2,783   $10.32     4 years    $17,822  

The price of options to purchase shares of common stock and Class A common stock outstanding at September 26, 2015, September 27, 2014 and September 28, 2013 was $6.43 to $15.00 per share, $6.43 to $16.23 per share and $4.60 to $16.23 per share, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2105, September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 was $2.72, $2.04$2.51, $1.93 and $2.65.$1.72, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 was $5.1$5.9 million, $2.6$1.4 million and $2.2$1.1 million, respectively.

As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, there was $10.8$4.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average vesting period of 3two years.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Restricted Stock Awards

As of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011,27, 2014, there were approximately 785,000 and 804,0001.6 million shares respectively, of restricted stock awards outstanding. The awardsAwards granted in fiscal 2015 generally vest within five years from the date of grant. In fiscal 2014, approximately $6.4 million of bonus amounts earned in 20% or 25% increments, some after a two or three year waiting period, over a six or seven year period of employment after the grant date.fiscal 2013 were paid by granting approximately 570,000 restricted shares that vested immediately.

Restricted stock award activity during the three fiscal years in the period ended September 29, 201226, 2015 is summarized as follows:

 

   Number of
Shares
  Weighted Average
Grant Date

Fair Value per
Share
 
   (in thousands)    

Nonvested at September 26, 2009

   518   $11.39  

Granted

   180   $9.54  

Vested

   (134 $10.15  

Forfeited

   (132 $11.66  
  

 

 

  

Nonvested at September 25, 2010

   432   $10.60  

Granted

   496   $9.32  

Vested

   (120 $12.38  

Forfeited

   (4 $13.00  
  

 

 

  

Nonvested at September 24, 2011

   804   $9.79  

Granted

   159   $9.16  

Vested

   (98 $12.12  

Forfeited

   (80 $8.32  
  

 

 

  

Nonvested at September 29, 2012

   785   $9.53  
  

 

 

  

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   Number of
Shares
  Weighted Average
Grant Date

Fair Value per
Share
 
   (in thousands)    

Nonvested at September 29, 2012

   785   $9.53  

Granted

   552   $9.26  

Vested

   (354 $9.60  

Forfeited

   (89 $9.37  
  

 

 

  

Nonvested at September 28, 2013

   894   $9.35  

Granted

   1,021   $7.98  

Vested

   (226 $9.92  

Forfeited

   (80 $8.93  
  

 

 

  

Nonvested at September 27, 2014

   1,609   $8.43  

Granted

   493   $10.55  

Vested

   (331 $8.63  

Forfeited

   (221 $8.84  
  

 

 

  

Nonvested at September 26, 2015

   1,550   $9.00  
  

 

 

  

The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the fiscal years ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, September 24, 201127, 2014 and September 25, 201028, 2013 was $9.16, $9.32$10.55, $7.98 and $9.54,$9.26, respectively. The aggregate fair value as of the vesting date of restricted shares that vested was $0.9$3.2 million, $1.1$1.7 million and $1.3$3.4 million for fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively.

As of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, there was $4.5$10.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of fourtwo years.

14.15. Shareholders’ Equity

At September 29, 2012,26, 2015, there were 80,000,000 shares of common stock ($0.01 par value) authorized, of which 12,247,57111,908,317 were outstanding, and 100,000,000 shares of non-voting Class A common stock ($0.01 par value) authorized, of which 34,706,90236,462,299 were outstanding. The preferences and relative rights of the Class A common stock are identical to common stock in all respects, except that the Class A common stock generally will have no voting rights unless otherwise required by Delaware law.

There are 3,000,000 shares of Class B stock ($0.01 par value) authorized, of which 1,652,262 were outstanding at September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 2011.27, 2014. The voting powers, preferences and relative rights of the Class B stock are identical to common stock in all respects except that (i) the holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share and the holders of Class B stock are entitled to the lesser of ten votes per share or

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

49% of the total votes cast, (ii) stock dividends on common stock may be paid only in shares of common stock and stock dividends on Class B stock may be paid only in shares of Class B stock and (iii) shares of Class B stock have certain conversion rights and are subject to certain restrictions on ownership and transfer. Each share of Class B stock is convertible into one share of common stock, at the option of the holder. Additional shares of Class B stock may only be issued with majority approval of the holders of the common stock and Class B stock, voting as separate classes.

UnderDuring fiscal 2011, the Company’s former stockBoard of Directors authorized a $100 million share repurchase program, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock, in part, to minimize the dilutive impact of the Company’s stock-based equity compensation programs over time. During the third fiscal quarter of fiscal 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new $100 million share repurchase program. During the fiscal year ended September 29, 2012,26, 2015, the Company repurchased 0.7$15.1 million shares of its voting common stock for an aggregate price of approximately $5.6 million and 1.9 million shares of its Class A non-voting common stock for an aggregate price of approximately $15.3 million.stock. In total, as of September 29, 2012,26, 2015, the Company had repurchased approximately 6.17.9 million shares for an aggregate price of approximately $48.4$65.0 million under the new share repurchase program.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

15.16. Earnings perPer Share

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (EPS) computations:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended
September 29, 2012
   Fiscal Year Ended
September 24, 2011
   Fiscal Year Ended
September 25, 2010
  Fiscal Year Ended
September 26, 2015
 Fiscal Year Ended
September 27, 2014
 Fiscal Year Ended
September 28, 2013
 
  Net
Income
   Shares   Per
Share
   Net
Income
   Shares   Per
Share
   Net
Income
   Shares   Per
Share
  Net
Income
 Shares Per
Share
 Net
Income
 Shares Per
Share
 Net
Income
(Loss)
 Shares Per
Share
 
  (in thousands, except per share amounts)  (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Basic EPS:

                           

Net income available to common shareholders

  $21,173     47,622    $0.44    $28,323     56,217    $0.50    $45,833     64,272    $0.71  

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 $31,971    48,562   $0.66   $8,804    48,880   $0.18   $(1,929  48,094   $(0.04

Effect of dilutive securities:

                           

Options to purchase common stock

     497     0       274     0       680     (0.01   520    (0.01   69    0     0    0  

Restricted shares

     255     0       154     0       139     0     556    (0.01   448    0     0    0  

Diluted EPS:

                           

Net income available to common shareholders

  $21,173     48,374    $0.44    $28,323     56,645    $0.50    $45,833     65,091    $0.70  

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 $31,971    49,638   $0.64   $8,804    49,397   $0.18   $(1,929  48,094   $(0.04

Options to purchase 11.6For fiscal 2015, 3.2 million shares of common stock and Class A common stock at prices ranging from $4.60 to $16.23 per share were outstanding at September 29, 2012. Of these shares, 6.1 million were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect of including these options would be anti-dilutive. Options to purchase 12.1 million shares of common stock and Class A common stock at prices ranging from $4.60 to $17.99 per share were outstanding at September 24, 2011. Of these shares, 8.4 million were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect of including these options would be anti-dilutive. Options to purchase 11.1 million shares of common stock and Class A common stock at prices ranging from $4.60 to $17.99 per share were outstanding at September 25, 2010. Of these shares, 5.7 million were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect of including these options would be anti-dilutive.

16. Quarterly Financial Data – UnauditedFor fiscal 2014, 9.7 million options were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect of including these options would be anti-dilutive.

For fiscal 2013, 10.4 million options were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect of including these options would be anti-dilutive. Regardless of exercise price, all outstanding stock options were excluded in the calculation due to the net loss recorded for the period ended September 28, 2013. In periods where net earnings are reported, these options may become dilutive if the average market price of our common stock exceeds the exercise price of the outstanding options.

   Fiscal 2012 
   1st Quarter  2nd Quarter   3rd Quarter   4th Quarter 
   (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net sales

  $302,066   $466,903    $533,808    $397,236  

Gross profit

   80,738    147,696     180,652     105,072  

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

   (13,090  21,623     22,699     (10,059

Net income (loss) per share:

       

Basic

  $(0.27 $0.46    $0.48    $(0.21

Diluted

  $(0.27 $0.45    $0.47    $(0.21

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

       

Basic

   47,823    47,343     47,661     47,704  

Diluted

   47,823    48,036     48,388     47,704  

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

17. Quarterly Financial Data – Unaudited

 

  Fiscal 2011   Fiscal 2015 
  1st Quarter 2nd Quarter   3rd Quarter   4th Quarter   1st Quarter 2nd Quarter   3rd Quarter   4th Quarter 
  (in thousands, except per share amounts)   (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net sales

  $281,719   $485,724    $484,303    $376,906    $307,320   $497,602    $459,446    $386,369  

Gross profit

   83,057    163,269     149,389     98,204     87,981    150,062     142,037     107,972  

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

   (9,592  31,766     17,081     (10,932   (5,697  23,237     18,800     (4,369) (1) 

Net income (loss) per share:

              

Basic

  $(0.16 $0.55    $0.32    $(0.21  $(0.12 $0.48    $0.39    $(0.09

Diluted

  $(0.16 $0.54    $0.31    $(0.21  $(0.12 $0.47    $0.38    $(0.09

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

              

Basic

   60,941    57,955     54,020     51,943     49,379    48,384     48,167     48,322  

Diluted

   60,941    58,433     54,498     51,943     49,379    49,439     49,290     48,322  

   Fiscal 2014 
   1st Quarter  2nd Quarter   3rd Quarter  4th Quarter 
   (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net sales

  $290,521   $501,611    $437,987   $374,238  

Gross profit

   79,741    147,596     119,131    107,556  

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

   (12,708  20,895     4,687 (2)   (4,070) (2) 

Net income (loss) per share:

      

Basic

  $(0.26 $0.43    $0.10   $(0.08

Diluted

  $(0.26 $0.43    $0.09   $(0.08

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

      

Basic

   48,368    48,688     49,148    49,324  

Diluted

   48,368    49,116     49,841    49,324  

(1)The Company recognized a $7.3 million non-cash impairment charge to its indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of increased competition and declining sales volume in its Pet segment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.
(2)The Company recognized a $16.9 million charge related to certain products introduced in fiscal 2013 and a $2.0 million gain on the sale of manufacturing plant assets in its Garden segment during the third quarter of fiscal 2014, as well as a $2.9 million gain on the sale of manufacturing plant assets in its Garden segment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.

17.18. Transactions with Related Parties

During fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010, subsidiaries of the Company purchased approximately $1.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of products from Bio Plus, Inc., a company that produces granular peanut hulls. As of September 29, 2012 and September 24, 2011, the amounts owed to BioPlus, Inc for such purchases were not material. A director of the Company is a minority shareholder and a director of Bio Plus, Inc.

During fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010,2013, Tech Pac, a subsidiary of the Company, made purchases from Contract Packaging, Inc, (“CPI”), Tech Pac’s principal supplier and a minority 20% shareholder in Tech Pac. Tech Pac’s total purchases from CPI were approximately $39.3$35.2 million, $33.2$30.8 million and $24.6$32.5 million for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. Amounts due to CPI as of September 29, 201226, 2015 and September 24, 201127, 2014 were $2.1$0.6 million and $2.2$0.6 million, respectively.

18.19. Business Segment Data

The Company’s chief operating decision-makers aredecision-maker is its Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Central Operating Companies.Officer. Operating segments are managed separately because each segment represents a strategic business that offers different products or services. The Company’s chief operating decision makers evaluatemaker evaluates performance based on profit or loss from

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

operations. The Company’s Corporate division is included in the following presentation since certain expenses of this division are not allocated separately to the two operating segments. Segment assets exclude cash equivalents, short-term investments, goodwill, and deferred taxes.

Management has determined that the Company has two operating segments which are also reportable segments based on the level at which the chief operating decision makers reviewmaker reviews the results of operations to make decisions regarding performance assessment and resource allocation. These operating segments are the Pet segment and the Garden segment. Substantially all of the Company’s assets and operations relate to its business in the United States.

The Pet segment consists of Four Paws Products, TFH Publications, Kaytee, Aquatics, Interpet, IMS, Pets International, Breeder’s Choice and Life Sciences. These businesses are engaged in the manufacturing, purchase, sale and delivery of internally and externally produced pet supplies, books and food principally to independent pet distributors, national and regional retail chains, grocery stores, mass merchants and bookstores. The Garden segment consists of Pennington Seed, Matthews Four Seasons, Grant’s, AMBRANDS, Lilly Miller, the Pottery

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Group, Gulfstream and GKI/Bethlehem Lighting. Products manufactured, designed and sourced, or distributed are products found typically in the lawn and garden sections of mass merchandisers, warehouse-type clubs, home improvement centers and nurseries and include grass seed, bird feed, clay pottery, outdoor wooden planters and trellises, herbicides and insecticides. These products are sold directly to national and regional retail chains, independent garden distributors, grocery stores, nurseries and garden supply retailers.

The Corporate division includes expenses associated with corporate functions and projects, certain employee benefits, goodwill, interest income, interest expense and intersegment eliminations.

The following table indicates each class of similar products which represented approximately 10% or more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in the fiscal years presented (in millions).

 

Category

  2012   2011   2010   2015   2014   2013 

Pet supplies (excluding wild bird feed)

  $847.1    $773.1    $766.5    $827.7    $774.2    $807.4  

Garden controls and fertilizer products

   281.7     260.0     255.5     286.3     262.5     274.9  

Wild bird feed

   205.1     197.5     168.9     193.2     202.1     210.8  

Other garden supplies

   185.7     212.1     196.0     181.4     182.5     183.5  

Grass seed

   180.4     185.9     136.7     162.1     183.1     177.0  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,700.0    $1,628.6    $1,523.6    $1,650.7    $1,604.4    $1,653.6  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TheSee Note 5 – Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers and Suppliers, for the Company’s largest customer represented approximately 17%, 16% and 17% of the total company net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and represented approximately 30% of the Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012, 28% in fiscal 2011 and 31% in fiscal 2010. Sales to the Company’s second largest customer represented approximately 9%, 12% and 10% of total company net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and represented approximately 20% of our Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012, 24% in fiscal 2011 and 22% in fiscal 2010. Sales to the Company’s third largest customer represented approximately 16% of our Garden segment’s net sales in fiscal 2012, 15% in fiscal 2011 and 18% in fiscal 2010. The Pet segment’s largest customer represented approximately 12% of our Pet segment’s net sales in both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 and 11% in fiscal 2010.customers by segment.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Financial information relating to the Company’s business segments for each of the three most recent fiscal years is presented in the table below (amounts in(in thousands):

 

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   September 29,
2012
  September 24,
2011
  September 25,
2010
 

Net sales:

    

Pet segment

  $930,753   $851,307   $840,576  

Garden segment

   769,260    777,345    683,072  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,700,013   $1,628,652   $1,523,648  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations:

    

Pet segment

  $87,650   $77,623   $97,893 (1) 

Garden segment

   40,376    50,013    52,995  

Corporate

   (53,605  (42,461  (41,814
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   74,421    85,175    109,074  

Interest expense

   (40,315  (38,044  (33,706

Interest income

   145    296    119  

Other income

   678    550    419  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

   34,929    47,977    75,906  

Income taxes

   12,816    19,595    28,110  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

   22,113    28,382    47,796  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   940    59    1,963  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  $21,173   $28,323   $45,833  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Assets:

    

Pet segment

  $411,059   $396,637   $385,894  

Garden segment

   341,716    350,234    323,387  

Corporate and eliminations

   396,772    346,132    421,603  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,149,547   $1,093,003   $1,130,884  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

    

Pet segment

  $14,507   $14,479   $15,422  

Garden segment

   6,213    5,986    6,107  

Corporate

   9,705    8,101    7,340  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $30,425   $28,566   $28,869  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expenditures for long-lived assets:

    

Pet segment

  $15,540   $9,953   $8,216  

Garden segment

   4,138    5,902    2,984  

Corporate

   19,914    15,708    12,990  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $39,592   $31,563   $24,190  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   September 26,
2015
  September 27,
2014
  September 28,
2013
 

Net sales:

    

Pet segment

  $894,549   $845,505   $888,228  

Garden segment

   756,188    758,852    765,405  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,650,737   $1,604,357   $1,653,633  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations:

    

Pet segment

  $98,798 (1)  $88,077   $95,451  

Garden segment

   60,145    41,020 (2)   8,286 (3) 

Corporate

   (67,508  (72,884  (63,582
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   91,435    56,213    40,155  

Interest expense

   (40,027  (42,844  (43,112

Interest income

   129    94    142  

Other income (expense)

   13    403    (677
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

   51,550    13,866    (3,492

Income tax expense (benefit)

   18,535    4,045    (2,592
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

   33,015    9,821    (900

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   1,044    1,017    1,029  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  $31,971   $8,804   $(1,929
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Assets:

    

Pet segment

  $465,171   $414,279   $425,988  

Garden segment

   310,981    337,461    388,581  

Corporate and eliminations

   358,602    396,987    346,591  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,134,754   $1,148,727   $1,161,160  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

    

Pet segment

  $15,885   $17,256   $15,753  

Garden segment

   5,988    6,793    6,410  

Corporate

   11,830    11,732    10,805  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $33,703   $35,781   $32,968  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expenditures for long-lived assets:

    

Pet segment

  $17,060   $8,561   $9,694  

Garden segment

   2,432    5,541    7,496  

Corporate

   2,538    3,071    7,982  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $22,030   $17,173   $25,172  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest is associated with the Garden segment.

 

(1)Includes a $7.3 million impairment charge to indefinite-lived intangible assetassets as a result of increased competition and declining sales volume.
(2)Includes a $16.9 million charge related to certain products introduced in fiscal and a $4.9 million gain from the sale of manufacturing plant assets.
(3)Includes goodwill impairment of $12,000.$7.7 million and an $11.2 million charge related to certain products introduced in fiscal 2013.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

19.20. Consolidating Condensed Financial Information of Guarantor Subsidiaries

Certain 100% wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (as listed below, collectively the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) have guaranteed fully and unconditionally, on a joint and several basis, the obligation to pay principal and interest on the Company’s $450 million 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) due March 1, 2018.2018 Notes. Certain subsidiaries and operating divisions are not guarantors of the Notes and have been included in the financial results of the Parent in the information below. These Non-Guarantor entities are not material to the Parent.Notes. Those subsidiaries that are guarantors and co-obligors of the Notes are as follows:

Farnam Companies, Inc.

Four Paws Products Ltd.

Gulfstream Home & Garden, Inc.

Kaytee Products, Inc.

Matson, LLC

New England Pottery, LLC

Pennington Seed, Inc. (including Gro Tec, Inc. and All-Glass Aquarium Co., Inc.)

Pets International, Ltd.

T.F.H. Publications, Inc.

Wellmark International (including B2E Corporation and B2E Biotech LLC)

During fiscal 2012, the Company consolidated certain of its legal entities into the Parent. In fiscal years 2011 and 2010, the following were included as Guarantor Subsidiaries because they were separate legal entities at that time:

Grant Laboratories, Inc.

Interpet USA, LLC

Matthews Redwood & Nursery Supply, Inc.

Fiscal 2012 financial results reflect these entities as part of the Parent. Fiscal 2011 and 2010 financial results presented herein have been restated to reflect the current Guarantor structure.

In lieu of providing separate audited financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the Company has included the accompanying consolidating condensed financial statements based on the Company’s understanding of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s interpretation and application of Rule 3-10 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-X.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended September 26, 2015
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net sales

 $494,143   $100,127   $1,136,958   $(80,491 $1,650,737  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

  387,632    76,597    773,369    (74,913  1,162,685  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  106,511    23,530    363,589    (5,578  488,052  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  126,223    18,329    257,643    (5,578  396,617  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  (19,712  5,201    105,946    0    91,435  

Interest expense

  (39,893  (268  134    0    (40,027

Interest income

  126    3    0    0    129  

Other income (expense)

  (372  407    (22  0    13  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates

  (59,851  5,343    106,058    0    51,550  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  (21,562  2,089    38,008    0    18,535  

Equity in earnings of affiliates

  70,260    0    2,445    (72,705  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

  31,971    3,254    70,495    (72,705  33,015  

Noncontrolling interest

  0    1,044    0    0    1,044  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $31,971   $2,210   $70,495   $(72,705 $31,971  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended September 29, 2012
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net sales

 $527,901   $1,244,430   $(72,318 $1,700,013  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

  383,990    874,183    (72,318  1,185,855  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  143,911    370,247    0    514,158  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  144,171    295,566    0    439,737  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  (260  74,681    0    74,421  

Interest – net

  (40,324  154    0    (40,170

Other income (expense)

  (3,764  4,442    0    678  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  (44,348  79,277    0    34,929  

Income taxes (tax benefit)

  (15,698  28,514    0    12,816  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

  (28,650  50,763    0    22,113  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

  940    0    0    940  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company before equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries

  (29,590  50,763    0    21,173  

Equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries

  50,763    0    (50,763  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $21,173   $50,763   $(50,763 $21,173  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended September 24, 2011
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net sales

 $500,668   $1,244,207   $(116,223 $1,628,652  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

  374,215    876,741    (116,223  1,134,733  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  126,453    367,466    0    493,919  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  132,974    275,770    0    408,744  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

  (6,521  91,696    0    85,175  

Interest – net

  (37,984  236    0    (37,748

Other income (expense)

  (236  786    0    550  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  (44,741  92,718    0    47,977  

Income taxes (tax benefit)

  (17,299  36,894    0    19,595  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

  (27,442  55,824     28,382  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

  59    0    0    59  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company before equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries

  (27,501  55,824    0    28,323  

Equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries

  55,824    0    (55,824  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $28,323   $55,824   $(55,824 $28,323  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

   CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended September 25, 2010
(in thousands)
 
   Parent  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net sales

  $505,933   $1,132,645    $(114,930 $1,523,648  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

   363,410    760,002     (114,930  1,008,482  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   142,523    372,643     0    515,166  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   132,708    261,384     0    394,092  

Intangible asset impairments

   0    12,000     0    12,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   9,815    99,259     0    109,074  

Interest – net

   (33,898  311     0    (33,587

Other income (expense)

   (7,851  8,270     0    419  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss ) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

   (31,934  107,840     0    75,906  

Income taxes (tax benefit)

   (11,688  39,798     0    28,110  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

   (20,246  68,042      47,796  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   1,963    0     0    1,963  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company before equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries

   (22,209  68,042     0    45,833  

Equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries

   68,042    0     (68,042  0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  $45,833   $68,042    $(68,042 $45,833  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended September 27, 2014
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net sales

 $460,781   $109,453   $1,103,926   $(69,803 $1,604,357  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

  370,492    87,028    757,217    (64,404  1,150,333  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  90,289    22,425    346,709    (5,399  454,024  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  117,240    18,230    267,740    (5,399  397,811  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  (26,951  4,195    78,969    0    56,213  

Interest expense

  (42,742  (218  116    0    42,844  

Interest income

  92    2    0    0    94  

Other income (expense)

  186    583    (366  0    403  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates

  (69,415  4,562    78,719    0    13,866  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  (26,962  756    30,251    0    4,045  

Equity in earnings of affiliates

  51,257    0    1,506    (52,763  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income loss including noncontrolling interest

  8,804    3,806    49,974    (52,763  9,821  

Noncontrolling interest

  0    1,017    0    0    1,017  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $8,804   $2,789   $49,974   $(52,763 $8,804  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2013
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net sales

 $453,001   $88,822   $1,186,328   $(74,518 $1,653,633  

Cost of goods sold and occupancy

  364,120    73,068    821,524    (68,981  1,189,731  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  88,881    15,754    364,804    (5,537  463,902  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  127,644    19,340    282,300    (5,537  423,747  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  (38,763  (3,586  82,504    0    40,155  

Interest expense

  (42,925  (263  76    0    43,112  

Interest income

  140    2    0    0    142  

Other income (expense)

  (250  398    (825  0    (677
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates

  (81,798  (3,449  81,755    0    (3,492

Income tax expense (benefit)

  (46,789  (2,567  46,764    0    (2,592

Equity in earnings of affiliates

  33,080    0    (2,561  (30,519  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest

  (1,929  (882  32,430    (30,519  (900

Noncontrolling interest

  0    1,029    0    0    1,029  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $(1,929 $(1,911 $32,430   $(30,519 $(1,929
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Fiscal Year Ended September 26, 2015
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income

 $31,971   $3,254   $70,495   $(72,705 $33,015  

Other comprehensive loss:

     

Unrealized loss on securities

  (10  0      (10

Reclassification of realized loss on securities included in net income

  20    0    0    0    20  

Foreign currency translation

  (1,078  (537  (380  917    (1,078
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  30,903    2,717    70,115    (71,788  31,947  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  0    1,044    0    0    1,044  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $30,903   $1,673   $70,115   $(71,788 $30,903  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
September 29, 2012
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 
ASSETS 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $44,662   $3,813   $0   $48,475  

Short term investments

  22,705    0    0    22,705  

Accounts receivable, net

  48,339    159,328    (5,245  202,422  

Inventories

  97,017    233,015    0    330,032  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  25,242    22,907    0    48,149  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

  237,965    419,063    (5,245  651,783  

Land, buildings, improvements and equipment, net

  81,727    109,436    0    191,163  

Goodwill

  0    210,223    0    210,223  

Investment in guarantors

  654,362    0    (654,362  0  

Other assets

  54,910    41,468    0    96,378  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $1,028,964   $780,190   $(659,607 $1,149,547  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    

Accounts payable

 $49,894   $82,013   $(5,245 $126,662  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  38,673    41,149    0    79,822  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  88,567    123,162    (5,245  206,484  

Long-term debt

  449,387    96    0    449,483  

Other long-term obligations

  26,127    2,570    0    28,697  

Shareholders’ equity attributable to Central Garden & Pet

  463,937    654,362    (654,362  463,937  

Noncontrolling interest

  946    0    0    946  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

  464,883    654,362    (654,362  464,883  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $1,028,964   $780,190   $(659,607 $1,149,547  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Fiscal Year Ended September 27, 2014
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income

 $8,804   $3,806   $49,974   $(52,763 $9,821  

Other comprehensive loss:

     

Foreign currency translation

  0    (200  0    0    (200

Unrealized loss on securities

  (10  0    0    0    (10
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  8,794    3,606    49,974    (52,763  9,611  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  0    1,017    0    0    1,017  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $8,794   $2,589   $49,974   $(52,763 $8,594  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2013
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income (loss)

 $(1,929 $(882 $32,430   $(30,519 $(900

Other comprehensive loss:

     

Foreign currency translation

  0    (97  0    0    (97
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

  (1,929  (979  32,430    (30,519  (997

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  0    1,029    0    0    1,029  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

 $(1,929 $(2,008 $32,430   $(30,519 $(2,026
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
September 24, 2011
(in thousands)
 
 Unconsolidated    CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
September 26, 2015
(in thousands)
 
 Parent Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated  Parent Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated 
ASSETS         

Cash and cash equivalents

 $10,633   $1,398   $0   $12,031   $37,131   $10,022   $431   $0   $47,584  

Short term investments

  17,820    0    0    17,820  

Restricted cash

  13,157    0    0    0    13,157  

Accounts receivable, net

  50,300    150,704    (5,587  195,417    51,376    6,775    149,251    0    207,402  

Inventories

  106,348    223,198    0    329,546    101,952    11,690    222,304    0    335,946  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  29,483    18,289    0    47,772    23,807    848    25,076    0    49,731  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

  214,584    393,589    (5,587  602,586    227,423    29,335    397,062    0    653,820  

Land, buildings, improvements and equipment, net

  72,721    103,681    0    176,402    53,044    3,663    106,102    0    162,809  

Goodwill

  0    210,223    0    210,223    0    0    209,089    0    209,089  

Investment in guarantors

  647,626    0    (647,626  0  

Other assets

  44,398    59,394    0    103,792  

Other long term assets

  33,988    3,662    77,519    (6,133  109,036  

Intercompany receivable

  10,311    0    440,327    (450,638  0  

Investment in subsidiaries

  1,052,755    0    0    (1,052,755  0  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 $979,329   $766,887   $(653,213 $1,093,003   $1,377,521   $36,660   $1,230,099   $(1,509,526 $1,134,754  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY         

Accounts payable

 $40,929   $81,182   $(5,587 $116,524   $23,544   $2,543   $62,802   $0   $88,889  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  39,205    36,202    0    75,407    39,680    1,789    46,255    0    87,724  

Current portion of long term debt

  261    0    30    0    291  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

  80,134    117,384    (5,587  191,931    63,485    4,332    109,087    0    176,904  

Long-term debt

  435,245    85    0    435,330    399,783    0    65    0    399,848  

Intercompany payable

  407,197    43,441    0    (450,638  0  

Losses in excess of investment in subsidiaries

  0    0    11,867    (11,867  0  

Other long-term obligations

  7,168    1,792    0    8,960    1,770    0    55,985    (6,133  51,622  

Shareholders’ equity attributable to Central Garden & Pet Company

  456,776    647,626    (647,626  456,776  

Shareholders’ equity attributable to Central Garden & Pet

  505,286    (12,207  1,053,095    (1,040,888  505,286  

Noncontrolling interest

  6    0    0    6    0    1,094    0    0    1,094  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

  456,782    647,626    (647,626  456,782    505,286    (11,113  1,053,095    (1,040,888  506,380  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 $979,329   $766,887   $(653,213 $1,093,003   $1,377,521   $36,660   $1,230,099   $(1,509,526 $1,134,754  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
September 27, 2014
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

ASSETS

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 $63,471   $12,806   $2,399   $0   $78,676  

Restricted cash

  14,283    0    0    0    14,283  

Short term investments

  9,990    0    0    0    9,990  

Accounts receivable, net

  41,235    8,268    144,226    0    193,729  

Inventories

  79,199    15,210    231,977    0    326,386  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  26,092    816    21,580    0    48,488  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

  234,270    37,100    400,182    0    671,552  

Land, buildings, improvements and equipment, net

  63,059    3,649    100,141    0    166,849  

Goodwill

  0    0    208,233    0    208,233  

Other long term assets

  25,230    4,244    83,713    (11,094  102,093  

Intercompany receivable

  16,906    0    351,423    (368,329  0  

Investment in subsidiaries

  983,413    0    0    (983,413  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $1,322,878   $44,993   $1,143,692   $(1,362,836 $1,148,727  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

     

Accounts payable

 $28,937   $3,542   $55,949   $0   $88,428  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  34,412    1,868    48,390    0    84,670  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  63,349    5,410    104,339    0    173,098  

Long-term debt

  449,855    0    93    0    449,948  

Intercompany payable

  323,315    45,014    0    (368,329  0  

Losses in excess of investment in subsidiaries

  0    0    7,594    (7,594  0  

Other long-term obligations

  1,636    0    48,686    (11,094  39,228  

Shareholders’ equity attributable to Central Garden & Pet

  484,723    (7,161  982,980    (975,819  484,723  

Noncontrolling interest

  0    1,730    0    0    1,730  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

  484,723    (5,431  982,980    (975,819  486,453  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $1,322,878   $44,993   $1,143,692   $(1,362,836 $1,148,727  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Year Ended September 29, 2012
(in thousands)
 
       Parent      Guarantor
     Subsidiaries    
      Eliminations          Consolidated     

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $74,405   $65,527   $(50,763 $89,169  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions to property

   (20,736  (18,856  0    (39,592

Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

   0    0    0    (0

Return of equity method investment

   0    0    0    0  

Investment in short term investments

   (4,885  0    0    (4,885

Investment in guarantor

   (6,736  (44,027  50,763    0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

   (32,357  (62,883  50,763    (44,477
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Repayments on revolving line of credit

   (339,000  0    0    (339,000

Borrowings on revolving line of credit

   304,000    0    0    304,000  

Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt

   49,312    0    0    49,312  

Repayments of long-term debt

   (231  (122  0    (353

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   2,129    0    0    2,129  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

   1,881    0    0    1,881  

Repurchase of common stock

   (24,829  0    0    (24,829

Payment of financing costs

   (1,715  0    0    (1,715
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (8,453  (122  0    (8,575
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   434    (107  0    327  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   34,029    2,415    0    36,444  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   10,633    1,398    0    12,031  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $44,662   $3,813   $0   $48,475  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Year Ended September 24, 2011
(in thousands)
  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Year Ended September 26, 2015
(in thousands)
 
      Parent     Guarantor
     Subsidiaries    
     Eliminations         Consolidated      Parent Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $50,459   $56,373   $(55,824 $51,008  

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 $(18,948 $7,372   $105,744   $(6,719 $87,449  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions to property

   (16,802  (14,761  0    (31,563

Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

   (23,403  (1,904  0    (25,307

Return of equity investment

   3,133    0    0    3,133  

Additions to property, plant and equipment

  (2,687  (405  (18,938  0    (22,030

Payments to acquire companies, net of expenses

  (38,384  0    0    0    (38,384

Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents

  1,126    0    0    0    1,126  

Maturities of short term investments

  9,997    0    0    0    9,997  

Investment in short term investments

   (2,500  0    0    (2,500  (17  0    0    0    (17

Investment in guarantor

   (16,719  (39,105  55,824    0  

Other investing activities

  (546  0    0    0    (546

Intercompany investing activities

  6,595    0    (88,905  82,310    0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

   (56,291  (55,770  55,824    (56,237

Net cash (used) provided by investing activities

  (23,916  (405  (107,843  82,310    (49,854
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Repayments on revolving line of credit

   (668,000  0    0    (668,000  (312,000  0    0    0    (312,000

Borrowings on revolving line of credit

   703,000    0    0    703,000    312,000    0    0    0    312,000  

Repayments of long-term debt

   (190  (145  0    (335  (50,262  0    (27  0    (50,289

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   1,675    0    0    1,675    200    0    0    0    200  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

   945    0    0    945    2,154    0    0    0    2,154  

Repurchase of common stock

   (108,727  0    0    (108,727  (18,497  0    0    0    (18,497

Payment of financing costs

   (1,055  0    0    (1,055

Payment of deferred financing costs

  (258  0    0    0    (258

Distribution to parent

  0    (6,719  0    6,719    0  

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

   (1,500  0    0    (1,500  0    (1,680  0    0    (1,680

Intercompany financing activities

  83,884    (1,574  0    (82,310  0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (73,852  (145  0    (73,997

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

  17,221    (9,973  (27  (75,591  (68,370
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   52    (255  0    (203  (697  222    158    0    (317
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (79,632  203    0    (79,429  (26,340  (2,784  (1,968  0    (31,092

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   90,265    1,195    0    91,460    63,471    12,806    2,399    0    78,676  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $10,633   $1,398   $0   $12,031   $37,131   $10,022   $431   $0   $47,584  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Year Ended September 27, 2014
(in thousands)
 
  Parent  Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 $(4,139 $7,420   $125,720   $(2,534 $126,467  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

  (6,721  (1,027  (9,425  0    (17,173

Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

  0    0    (20,282  0    (20,282

Proceeds from disposal of plant and equipment

  0    0    8,737    0    8,737  

Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents

  (14,283  0    0    0    (14,283

Maturities of short term investments

  17,820    0    0    0    17,820  

Investment in short term investments

  (10,000  0    0    0    (10,000

Intercompany investing activities

  (6,726  0    (104,926  111,652    0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used) provided by investing activities

  (19,910  (1,027  (125,896  111,652    (35,181
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Repayments on revolving line of credit

  (301,000  0    0    0    (301,000

Borrowings on revolving line of credit

  278,000    0    0    0    278,000  

Repayments of long-term debt

  (243  0    (124  0    (367

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  1,165    0    0    0    1,165  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

  498    0    0    0    498  

Repurchase of common stock

  (2,332  0    0    0    (2,332

Payment of deferred financing costs

  (3,090  0    0    0    (3,090

Distribution to parent

  0    (2,534  0    2,534    0  

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

  0    (633  0    0    (633

Intercompany financing activities

  109,057    2,595    0    (111,652  0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

  82,055    (572  (124  (109,118  (27,759
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash

  27    (18  (16  0    (7
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  58,033    5,803    (316  0    63,520  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  5,438    7,003    2,715    0    15,156  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $63,471   $12,806   $2,399   $0   $78,676  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Year Ended September 25, 2010
(in thousands)
  CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2013
(in thousands)
 
      Parent     Guarantor
     Subsidiaries    
     Eliminations         Consolidated      Parent Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $86,344   $116,927   $(68,042 $135,229  

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 $(31,250 $(11,632 $17,116   $(2,516 $(28,282
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions to property

   (15,939  (8,251  0    (24,190

Additions to property, plant and equipment

  (8,656  (337  (16,179  0    (25,172

Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

   0    (1,756  0    (1,756  0    0    (4,835  0    (4,835

Investment in short term investments

   (15,320  0    0    (15,320

Investment in guarantor

   38,667    (106,709  68,042    0  

Sale of short term investments

  4,885    0    0    0    4,885  

Intercompany investing activities

  8,986    0    2,923    (11,909  0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

   7,408    (116,716  68,042    (41,266

Net cash (used) provided by investing activities

  5,215    (337  (18,091  (11,909  (25,122
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Repayments on revolving line of credit

   (10,000  0    0    (10,000  (368,000  0    0    0    (368,000

Borrowings on revolving line of credit

   10,000    0    0    10,000    391,000    0    0    0    391,000  

Repayments of long-term debt

   (407,675  (249  0    (407,924  (206  0    (126  0    (332

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   400,000    0    0    400,000  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   1,294    0    0    1,294    613    0    0    0    613  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

   836    0    0    836    388    0    0    0    388  

Repurchase of common stock

   (66,901  0    0    (66,901  (2,731  0    0    0    (2,731

Payment of financing costs

   (12,711  0    0    (12,711

Distribution to parent

  0    (2,516  0    2,516    0  

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

   (2,761  0    0    (2,761  0    (629  0    0    (629

Intercompany financing activities

  (28,896  16,987    0    11,909    0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (87,918  (249  0    (88,167

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

  (7,832  13,842    (126  14,425    20,309  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   (44  40    0    (4  36    (263  3    0    (224
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   5,790    2    0    5,792    (33,831  1,610    (1,098  0    (33,319

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   84,475    1,193    0    85,668    39,269    5,393    3,813    0    48,475  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $90,265   $1,195   $0   $91,460   $5,438   $7,003   $2,715   $0   $15,156  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

21. Subsequent Events

Debt Refinancing

In November 2015, the Company issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due November 2023 (the“2023 Notes”). The 2023 Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries which are borrowers under or guarantors of the senior secured revolving credit facility. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering, together with available cash, to redeem its outstanding 8.25% senior subordinated notes due March 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) and pay fees and expenses related to the offering. As a result of the Company’s redemption of the 2018 Notes, it will recognize a charge in its fiscal 2016 first quarter of approximately $8.3 million related to the payment of the call premium, a one-time payment of overlapping interest expense for 30 days of approximately $2.8 million and a $3.2 million non-cash charge for the write-off of unamortized financing costs in interest expense. The Company expects its annual interest expense on the 2023 Notes going forward to be approximately $8.5 million less than under the 2018 Notes.

DMC Acquisition

On December 1, 2015, the Company purchased the pet bedding and certain other assets of National Consumers Outdoors Corp., formerly known as Dallas Manufacturing Company (“DMC”), for a cash purchase price of $61 million. This acquisition is expected to complement the Company’s existing dog and cat business.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Set forth below is a list of exhibits that are being filed or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K:

 

     Incorporated by Reference        Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

  Form  File
No.
  Exhibit  Filing
Date
  Filed
Herewith
  

Exhibit

  
Form
  File
No.
  
Exhibit
  Filing
Date
  Filed
Herewith
3.1  Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, including the Certificate of Designation – Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Certificate of Designation – Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.  10-K  001-

33268

  3.1  12/14/06    Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, including the Certificate of Designation – Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Certificate of Designation – Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.  10-K  001-33268  3.1  12/14/2006  
3.2  Amended and Restated By-laws of Central Garden & Pet Company, effective February 10, 2009.  10-Q  001-

33268

  3.2  5/7/09    Amended and Restated By-laws of Central Garden & Pet Company, effective August 18, 2015.          X
4.1  Specimen Common Stock Certificate.  S-1  33-

48070

  4.1  5/21/92    Specimen Common Stock Certificate.  S-1  33-48070  4.1  5/21/1992  
4.2  Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate.  8-A  001-

33268

  1  1/24/07    Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate.  8-A  001-33268  1  1/24/2007  
4.3  Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2010, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.  8-K  001-33268  4.2  3/8/2010  
4.4  Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2010, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.  8-K  001-

33268

  4.2  3/8/10    First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2010, by and among the Company, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018.  8-K  001-33268  4.3  3/8/2010  
4.5  First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2010, by and among the Company, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018.  8-K  001-

33268

  4.3  3/8/10    Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, by and among the Company, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018.  8-K  001-33268  4.1  2/13/2012  
4.6  Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, by and among the Company, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018.  8-K  001-

33268

  4.1  2/13/12    Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 9, 2015, by and among the Company, the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to 6.125% Senior Notes due 2023.          X
4.7  Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 13, 2012, among the Company, certain subsidiary guarantors parties thereto, and the Initial Purchasers.  8-K  001-

33268

  10.1  2/13/12  
10.1*  Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Executive Officers and Directors.  S-1  33-

48070

  10.18  5/21/92    Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Executive Officers and Directors.  S-1  33-48070  10.18  5/21/1992  
10.2  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2010 among the Company, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, SunTrust Bank., as Syndication Agent, and certain other lenders.  8-K  001-

33268

  10.1  7/1/10    Credit Agreement dated December 5, 2013 among the Company, certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers and guarantors, a syndicate of financial institutions party thereto, SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent and swingline lender, and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association and Harris Bank as joint lead arrangers and bookrunners.  10-Q  001-33268  10.1  2/6/2014  
10.3  Amendment No. 1 dated June 8, 2011 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2010 among the Company, certain institutions listed on the signature pages thereto, and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent, and certain other lenders.  8-K  001-

33268

  10.1  6/10/11  


Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit

Form

File
No.
ExhibitFiling
Date
Filed
Herewith
10.4*2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective February 13, 2012.8-K001-

33268

10.22/15/12
10.5*Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.10-K000-

20242

10.5.112/9/04
10.6*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.10-K000-

20242

10.5.212/9/04
10.7*Form of Performance-Based Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan10-K001-

33268

10.4.311/19/10
10.8*Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective December 10, 2008 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009).10-Q001-

33268

10.55/7/09
10.9*Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan.10-Q000-

20242

10.6.12/3/05
10.10*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan.10-Q000-

20242

10.6.22/3/05
10.11*Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 1998 between Pennington Seed, Inc. of Delaware and Brooks Pennington III.10-K/A000-

20242

10.201/20/99
10.12*Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 1998 between Pennington Seed, Inc. of Delaware and Brooks Pennington III, dated as of May 6, 2003.10-Q000-

20242

10.7.18/8/03
10.13*Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of April 10, 2006, between the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III.8-K000-

20242

10.14/14/06
10.14*Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2008, between the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III.10-K001-

33268

10.7.211/26/08
10.15*Form of Agreement to Protect Confidential Information, Intellectual Property and Business Relationships.8-K000-

20242

10.110/14/05
10.16*Form of Post-Termination Consulting Agreement.8-K000-

20242

10.210/14/05
10.17*Separation Agreement between the Company and Glen R. Fleischer dated May 31, 2011.10-Q001-

33268

10.28/4/11
10.18*Employment Offer Letter between the Company and Lori Varlas dated November 5, 2010.8-K001-

33268

10.112/1/10
10.19*Employment Agreement between Gus Halas and the Company, dated April 15, 2011.10-Q001-

33268

10.18/4/11
      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

  
Form
  File
No.
  
Exhibit
  Filing
Date
  Filed
Herewith
  10.3  Amendment No. 1, dated November 3, 2015, to Credit Agreement dated December 5, 2013.  8-K  001-33268  10.1  11/9/2015  
  10.4*  2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective February 13, 2012.  8-K  001-33268  10.2  2/15/2012  
  10.5*  Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.  10-K  000-20242  10.5.1  12/9/2004  
  10.6*  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.  10-K  000-20242  10.5.2  12/9/2004  
  10.7*  Form of Performance-Based Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for 2003 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan  10-K  001-33268  10.4.3  11/19/2010  
  10.8*  Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective December 10, 2008 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009).  10-Q  001-33268  10.5  5/7/2009  
  10.9*  Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan.  10-Q  000-20242  10.6.1  2/3/2005  
  10.10*  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan.  10-Q  000-20242  10.6.2  2/3/2005  
  10.11*  Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 1998 between Pennington Seed, Inc. of Delaware and Brooks Pennington III.  10-K/A  000-20242  10.20  1/20/1999  
  10.12*  Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 1998 between Pennington Seed, Inc. of Delaware and Brooks Pennington III, dated as of May 6, 2003.  10-Q  000-20242  10.7.1  8/8/2003  
  10.13*  Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of April 10, 2006, between the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III.  8-K  000-20242  10.1  4/14/2006  
  10.14*  Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2008, between the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III.  10-K  001-33268  10.7.2  11/26/2008  
  10.15*  Amendment of Employment Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement between the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III, dated March 20, 2012.  10-Q  001-33268  10.1  2/7/2013  


      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

  
Form
  File
No.
  
Exhibit
  Filing
Date
  Filed
Herewith
  10.16*  Modification and Extension of Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2014, between the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III.  10-Q  001-33268  10.1  2/5/2015  
  10.17*  Form of Agreement to Protect Confidential Information, Intellectual Property and Business Relationships.  8-K  000-20242  10.1  10/14/2005  
  10.18*  Form of Post-Termination Consulting Agreement.  8-K  000-20242  10.2  10/14/2005  
  10.19*  Consulting Services Agreement between the Company and Gus Halas, dated January 15, 2013.  10-Q  001-33268  10.2  2/7/2013  
  10.20*  Employment Agreement between the Company and John Ranelli, dated January 9, 2013.  10-Q  001-33268  10.3  2/7/2013  
  10.21*  Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 22, 2015 between the Company and John R. Ranelli.  8-K  001-33268  10.1  7/27/2015  
  10.22*  Election for Additional Compensation and Release Agreement between the Company and Steven LaMonte, effective April 19, 2014  10-K  001-33268  10.22  12/11/2014  
  10.23*  Employment Agreement between the Company and David Chichester, effective September 2, 2015.          X
  10.24*  Employment Agreement between the Company and George A. Yuhas, effective March 1, 2011.          X
  12  Statement re Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.          X
  14  Code of Ethics, updated May 2009  10-K  001-33268  14  12/13/2012  
  21  List of Subsidiaries.          X
  23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.          X
  31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).          X
  31.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).          X
  32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.          X
  32.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.          X
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document          X
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document          X


      Incorporated by Reference   

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit

  
Form
  File
No.
  
Exhibit
  Filing
Date
  Filed
Herewith
10.20*Employment Agreement between the Company and Frank P. Palantoni dated February 1, 2011.10-K001-

33268

10.1211/18/11
10.2*First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 28, 2012, between the Company and Frank P. Palantoni.X
10.14*Employment Agreement between Steven LaMonte and the Company effective May 7, 2012.10-Q001-

33268

10.18/2/12
12Statement re Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.X
14Code of Ethics, updated May 2009X
21List of Subsidiaries.X
23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.X
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).X
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).X
32.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.X
32.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.X
101.INS**XBRL Instance DocumentX
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
101.CAL**101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document          X
101.DEF**101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document          X
101.LAB**101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document          X
101.PRE**101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document          X

 

*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that, the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and are otherwise not subject to liability under these sections.